LOGOLOGO

20142016 ANNUAL REPORT

FINANCIAL CONTENTS

 

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

  1430 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Selected Financial Data

  1531 

Overview

  1632 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

  2136 

Recent Accounting Standards

  2339 

Critical Accounting Policies

  23

Risk Factors

2739 

Statements of Income Analysis

  3642 

Business Segment Review

  4350 

Fourth Quarter Review

  5058 

Balance Sheet Analysis

  5260 

Risk Management - Overview

66

Credit Risk Management

  5767

Market Risk Management

81

Liquidity Risk Management

85

Operational Risk Management

86

Compliance Risk Management

87

Capital Management

87 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

  8190 

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

  8291 

Management’s Assessment as to the Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

  8392 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  8493 

Financial Statements

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  8595 

Consolidated Statements of Income

  8696 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

  8797 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

  8898 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  8999 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

      

Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies

   90    Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees   130  

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

   100    Legal and Regulatory Proceedings   134  

Restrictions on Cash and Dividends

   100    Related Party Transactions   136  

Securities

   101    Income Taxes   137  

Loans and Leases

   103    Retirement and Benefit Plans   138  

Credit Quality and the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

   104    Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income   143  

Bank Premises and Equipment

   113    Common, Preferred and Treasury Stock   145  

Goodwill

   114    Stock-Based Compensation   147  

Intangible Assets

   115    Other Noninterest Income and Other Noninterest Expense   151  

Variable Interest Entities

   116    Earnings Per Share   152  

Sales of Receivables and Servicing Rights

   119    Fair Value Measurements   153  

Derivative Financial Instruments

   121    Certain Regulatory Requirements and Capital Ratios   164  

Offsetting Derivative Financial Instruments

   126    Parent Company Financial Statements   165  

Other Assets

   126    Business Segments   167  

Short-Term Borrowings

   127    Subsequent Event   170  

Long-Term Debt

   128      

Annual Report on Form 10-K

   171      

Consolidated Ten Year Comparison

   187      

Directors and Officers

   188      

Corporate Information

      

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies

100

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

111

Restrictions on Cash and Dividends

111

Investment Securities

113

Loans and Leases

115

Credit Quality and the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

117

Bank Premises and Equipment

125

Operating Lease Equipment

126

Goodwill

126

Intangible Assets

126

Variable Interest Entities

127

Sales of Receivables and Servicing Rights

130

Derivative Financial Instruments

132

Other Assets

137

Short-Term Borrowings

138

Annual Report on Form 10-K

183

Consolidated Ten Year Comparison

210

Directors and Officers

211

Corporate Information

Long-Term Debt

139

Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees

142

Legal and Regulatory Proceedings

146

Related Party Transactions

148

Income Taxes

151

Retirement and Benefit Plans

153

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

157

Common, Preferred and Treasury Stock

159

Stock-Based Compensation

160

Other Noninterest Income and Other Noninterest Expense

164

Earnings Per Share

165

Fair Value Measurements

166

Regulatory Capital Requirements and Capital Ratios

177

Parent Company Financial Statements

178

Business Segments

180

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains statements that we believe are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 175 promulgated thereunder, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 3b-6 promulgated thereunder. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. They usually can be identified by the use of forward-looking language such as “will likely result,” “may,” “are expected to,” “is anticipated,” “potential,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “projected,” “intends to,” or may include other similar words or phrases such as “believes,” “plans,” “trend,” “objective,” “continue,” “remain,” or similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” or similar verbs. You should not place undue reliance on these statements, as they are subject to risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risk factors set forth in the Risk Factors section in Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind these risks and uncertainties, as well as any cautionary statements we may make. Moreover, you should treat these statements as speaking only as of the date they are made and based only on information then actually known to us. There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to: (1) general economic conditions and weakening in the economy, specifically theor real estate market conditions, either nationally or in the states in which Fifth Third, one or more acquired entities and/or the combined company do business, weaken or are less favorable than expected; (2) deteriorating credit quality; (3) political developments, wars or other hostilities may disrupt or increase volatility in securities markets or other economic conditions; (4) changes in the interest rate environment reduce interest margins; (5) prepayment speeds, loan origination and sale volumes, charge-offs and loan loss provisions; (6) Fifth Third’s ability to maintain required capital levels and adequate sources of funding and liquidity; (7) maintaining capital requirements and adequate sources of funding and liquidity may limit Fifth Third’s operations and potential growth; (8) changes and trends in capital markets; (9) problems encountered by larger or similar financial institutions may adversely affect the banking industry and/or Fifth Third; (10) competitive pressures among depository institutions increase significantly; (11) changes in customer preferences or information technology systems; (12) effects of critical accounting policies and judgments; (12)(13) changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or other regulatory agencies; (13)(14) legislative or regulatory changes or actions, or significant litigation, adversely affect Fifth Third, one or more acquired entities and/or the combined company or the businesses in which Fifth Third, one or more acquired entities and/or the combined company are engaged, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; (14)(15) ability to maintain favorable ratings from rating agencies; (15)(16) failure of models or risk management systems or controls; (17) fluctuation of Fifth Third’s stock price; (16)(18) ability to attract and retain key personnel; (17)(19) ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries; (18)(20) potentially dilutive effect of future acquisitions on current shareholders’ ownership of Fifth Third; (19)(21) declines in the value of Fifth Third’s goodwill or other intangible assets; (22) effects of accounting or financial results of one or more acquired entities; (20)(23) difficulties from Fifth Third’s investment in, relationship with, and nature of the operations of Vantiv Holding, LLC; (21)(24) loss of income from any sale or potential sale of businesses that could have an(25) difficulties in separating the operations of any branches or other assets divested; (26) losses or adverse effectimpacts on Fifth Third’s earningsthe carrying values of branches and future growth; (22)long-lived assets in connection with their sales or anticipated sales; (27) inability to achieve expected benefits from branch consolidations and planned sales within desired timeframes, if at all; (28) ability to secure confidential information and deliver products and services through the use of computer systems and telecommunications networks; and (23)(29) the impact of reputational risk created by these developments on such matters as business generation and retention, funding and liquidity.


GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

Fifth Third Bancorp provides the following list of abbreviations and acronyms as a tool for the reader that are used in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

ALCO: Asset Liability Management Committee

GSE: Government Sponsored Enterprise

ALLL:Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

HAMP:Home Affordable Modification Program
AML:Anti-Money LaunderingHARP:Home Affordable Refinance Program

AOCI:Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

HFS:Held for Sale

ARM:Adjustable Rate Mortgage

HQLA:ASF:High Quality Liquid Assets

Available Stable Funding

ASU: Accounting Standards Update

ATM:Automated Teller Machine

IPO:BCBS:Initial Public Offering

BCBS: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

BHC: Bank Holding Company

BHCA: Bank Holding Company Act

BOLI: Bank Owned Life Insurance

BPO: Broker Price Opinion

bps: Basis Points

CCAR: Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review

CDC: Fifth Third Community Development Corporation

CET1: Common Equity Tier 1

CFE: Collateralized Financing Entity

CFPB: United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

CFTC: Commodity Futures Trading Commission

C&I: Commercial and Industrial

CRA: Community Reinvestment Act

DCF: Discounted Cash Flow

DFA: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

DIF: Deposit Insurance Fund

DTCC:Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation

ERISA: Employee Retirement Income Security Act

ERM: Enterprise Risk Management

ERMC: Enterprise Risk Management Committee

EVE: Economic Value of Equity

FASB:Financial Accounting Standards Board

FDIA: Federal Deposit Insurance Act

FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

FFIEC:Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

FHA: Federal Housing Administration

FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank

FHLMC: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

FICO:Fair Isaac Corporation (credit rating)

FINRA: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

FNMA: Federal National Mortgage Association

FRB: Federal Reserve Bank

FSOC: Financial Stability Oversight Council

FTE:Fully Taxable Equivalent

FTP: Funds Transfer Pricing

FTS: Fifth Third Securities

GDP: Gross Domestic Product

GNMA: Government National Mortgage Association

GSE: United States Government Sponsored Enterprise

HAMP: Home Affordable Modification Program

HARP: Home Affordable Refinance Program

HFS: Held for Sale

HQLA: High-Quality Liquid Assets

IPO: Initial Public Offering

IRC:Internal Revenue Code

BHC:Bank Holding Company

IRLC:Interest Rate Lock Commitment

BHCA:Bank Holding Company Act

IRS:Internal Revenue Service

BOLI:Bank Owned Life Insurance

ISDA:International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

BPO:Broker Price Opinion

LCR:Liquidity Coverage Ratio

bps:Basis points

LIBOR:London Interbank Offered Rate

BSA:Bank Secrecy Act

LLC:Limited Liability Company

CCAR:Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review

LTV:Loan-to-Value

CDC:Fifth Third Community Development Corporation

MD&A:Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial

CFPB:United States Consumer Financial Protection BureauCondition and Results of Operations

CFTC:MSA:Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Metropolitan Statistical Area

MSR:Mortgage Servicing Right

C&I:Commercial and Industrial

N/A:Not Applicable

CPP:Capital Purchase Program

NASDAQ:National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations

CRA:Community Reinvestment Act
DCF:Discounted Cash Flow

NII:Net Interest Income

DFA:Dodd-Frank Act

NM:Not Meaningful

DIF:Deposit Insurance Fund

NSFR:Net Stable Funding Ratio

ERISA:OAS:Employee Retirement Income Security Act

Option-Adjusted Spread

OCC:Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

ERM:Enterprise Risk Management

OCI:Other Comprehensive Income

ERMC:Enterprise Risk Management Committee

OREO:Other Real Estate Owned

EVE:Economic Value of Equity

OTTI:Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

FASB:PCA:Financial Accounting Standards Board

Prompt Corrective Action

PMI:Private Mortgage Insurance

FDIA:PSA:Federal Deposit Insurance Act

Performance Share Award

RSAs:RSA:Restricted Stock Awards

Award

FDIC:RSF:Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Required Stable Funding

SARs:RSU: Restricted Stock Unit

SAR:Stock Appreciation Rights

FHA:Federal Housing AdministrationRight

SBA:Small Business Administration

FHLB:Federal Home Loan Bank

SEC:United States Securities and Exchange Commission

FHLMC:Federal Home Loan Mortgage CorporationTARP:Troubled Asset Relief Program
FICO:Fair Isaac Corporation (credit rating)

TBA:To Be Announced

FNMA:Federal National Mortgage Association

TDR:Troubled Debt Restructuring

FRB:TILA:Federal Reserve Bank

Truth in Lending Act

TRA:Tax Receivable Agreement

TruPS:Trust Preferred Securities

FSOC:Financial Stability Oversight Council

U.S.:United States of America

FTAM:Fifth Third Asset Management, Inc.

U.S. GAAP:United States Generally Accepted Accounting

FTE:Fully Taxable EquivalentPrinciples
FTP:Funds Transfer Pricing

VA:Department of Veterans Affairs

FTS:Fifth Third Securities

VIE:Variable Interest Entity

GDP:Gross Domestic Product

VRDN:Variable Rate Demand Note

GNMA:Government National Mortgage Association

 

1430  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is MD&AManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of certain significant factors that have affected Fifth Third Bancorp’s (the “Bancorp” or “Fifth Third”) financial condition and results of operations during the periods included in the Consolidated Financial Statements, which are a part of this filing. Reference to the Bancorp incorporates the parent holding company and all consolidated subsidiaries. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is referred to as the Bank.

 

                                                                 
TABLE 1: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA                            

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions, except for per share data)

 2014  2013  2012  2011  2010   2016  2015   2014 2013 2012

Income Statement Data

        

Net interest income(a)

$3,600  3,581  3,613  3,575  3,622 

Net interest income (U.S. GAAP)

  $              3,615   3,533    3,579  3,561  3,595

Net interest income (FTE)(a)(b)

  3,640   3,554    3,600  3,581  3,613

Noninterest income

 2,473  3,227  2,999  2,455  2,729   2,696   3,003    2,473  3,227  2,999

Total revenue(a)

 6,073  6,808  6,612  6,030  6,351   6,336   6,557    6,073  6,808  6,612

Provision for loan and lease losses

 315  229  303  423  1,538   343   396    315  229  303

Noninterest expense

 3,709  3,961  4,081  3,758  3,855   3,903   3,775    3,709  3,961  4,081

Net income attributable to Bancorp

 1,481  1,836  1,576  1,297  753   1,564   1,712    1,481  1,836  1,576

Net income available to common shareholders

 1,414  1,799  1,541  1,094  503   1,489   1,637    1,414  1,799  1,541

Common Share Data

        

Earnings per share, basic

$1.68  2.05  1.69  1.20  0.63 

Earnings per share, diluted

 1.66  2.02  1.66  1.18  0.63 

Cash dividends per common share

 0.51  0.47  0.36  0.28  0.04 

Earnings per share - basic

  $                1.95   2.03    1.68  2.05  1.69

Earnings per share - diluted

  1.93   2.01    1.66  2.02  1.66

Cash dividends declared per common share

  0.53   0.52    0.51  0.47  0.36

Book value per share

 17.35  15.85  15.10  13.92  13.06   19.82   18.48    17.35  15.85  15.10

Market value per share

 20.38  21.03  15.20  12.72  14.68   26.97   20.10    20.38  21.03  15.20

Financial Ratios (%)

Financial Ratios

        

Return on average assets

 1.12  %  1.48     1.34     1.15     0.67      1.10%   1.22(j)    1.12(j)   1.48(j)  1.34(j)

Return on average common equity

 10.0  13.1  11.6  9.0  5.0   9.8   11.3    10.0  13.1  11.6

Return on average tangible common equity(b)

 12.2  16.0  14.3  11.4  7.0   11.6   13.5    12.2  16.0  14.3

Dividend payout ratio

 30.3  22.9  21.3  23.3  6.3   27.2   25.6    30.3  22.9  21.3

Average Total Bancorp shareholders’ equity as a percent of average assets

 11.59  11.56  11.65  11.41  12.22 

Tangible common equity(b)

 8.43  8.63  8.83  8.68  7.04 

Net interest margin(a)

 3.10  3.32  3.55  3.66  3.66 

Efficiency(a)

 61.1  58.2  61.7  62.3  60.7 

Average total Bancorp shareholders’ equity as a percent of average assets

  11.67   11.33(j)    11.59(j)   11.56(j)  11.65(j)

Tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets(b)(i)

  8.87   8.59    8.43  8.63  8.83

Net interest margin(a)(b)

  2.88   2.88    3.10  3.32  3.55

Efficiency(a)(b)

  61.6   57.6    61.1  58.2  61.7

Credit Quality

        

Net losses charged-off

$575  501  704  1,172  2,328   $                 362   446    575  501  704

Net losses charged-off as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases

 0.64  %  0.58  0.85  1.49  3.02   0.39%   0.48    0.64  0.58  0.85

ALLL as a percent of portfolio loans and leases

 1.47  1.79  2.16  2.78  3.88   1.36   1.37    1.47  1.79  2.16

Allowance for credit losses as a percent of portfolio loans and leases(c)

 1.62  1.97  2.37  3.01  4.17   1.54   1.52    1.62  1.97  2.37

Nonperforming assets as a percent of portfolio loans, leases and other assets, including other real estate owned(d)

 0.82  1.10  1.49  2.23  2.79 

Nonperforming portfolio assets as a percent of portfolio loans and leases and OREO

  0.80   0.70    0.82  1.10  1.49

Average Balances

        

Loans and leases, including held for sale

$91,127  89,093  84,822  80,214  79,232   $            94,320   93,339    91,127  89,093  84,822

Total securities and other short-term investments

 24,866  18,861  16,814  17,468  19,699   31,965   30,245    24,866  18,861  16,814

Total assets

       131,943  123,732  117,614  112,666  112,434   142,266   140,078(j)    131,909(j)   123,704(j)  117,562(j)

Transaction deposits(e)

 89,715  82,915  78,116  72,392  65,662 

Core deposits(f)

 93,477  86,675  82,422  78,652  76,188 

Wholesale funding(g)

 19,188  17,797  16,978  16,939  18,917 

Transaction deposits(d)

  95,371   95,244    89,715   82,915  78,116

Core deposits(e)

  99,381   99,295    93,477  86,675  82,422

Wholesale funding(f)

  21,813   20,210(j)    19,154(j)   17,769(j)  16,926(j)

Bancorp shareholders’ equity

 15,290  14,302  13,701  12,851  13,737   16,597   15,865    15,290  14,302  13,701

Regulatory Capital Ratios (%)

Regulatory Capital and Liquidity Ratios  Basel III  Transitional(g)   Basel I(h)(k)
  

 

   

 

 

CET1 capital

  10.39%   9.82(k)    N/A  N/A  N/A

Tier I risk-based capital

 10.83  %  10.43  10.69  12.00  13.89   11.50   10.93(k)    10.83   10.43   10.69 

Total risk-based capital

 14.33  14.17  14.47  16.19  18.08   15.02   14.13(k)    14.33   14.17   14.47 

Tier I leverage

 9.66  9.73  10.15  11.25  12.79   9.90   9.54(k)    9.66   9.73   10.15 

Tier I common equity(b)

 9.65  9.45  9.54  9.41  7.48 

CET1 capital (fully phased-in)(b)

  10.29   9.72(k)    N/A  N/A  N/A

Modified LCR

  128   N/A    N/A  N/A  N/A

(a)

Amounts presented on aan FTE basis. The FTE adjustment for the years endedDecember 31, 20142016, 2015, 2014, 2013 2012, 2011 and 20102012 was$21,25$20, $18, $18, $21, $21, $20 and $18, respectively.

(b)

The return on average tangible common equity, tangible common equity and Tier I common equity ratiosThese are non-GAAP measures. For further information, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

(c)

The allowance for credit losses is the sum of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments.

(d)

Excludes nonaccrual loans held for sale.Includes demand deposits, interest checking deposits, savings deposits, money market deposits and foreign office deposits.

(e)

Includes demand, interest checking, savings, money market and foreign office deposits.

(f)

Includes transaction deposits plusand other time deposits.

(g)(f)

Includes certificates $100,000 and over, other deposits, federal funds purchased, other short-term borrowings and long-term debt.

(g)

Under the U.S. banking agencies’ Basel III Final Rule, assets and credit equivalent amounts of off-balance sheet exposures are calculated according to the standardized approach for risk-weighted assets. The resulting values are added together in the Bancorp’s total risk-weighted assets.

(h)

These capital ratios were calculated under the Supervisory Agencies general risk-based capital rules (Basel I) which were in effect prior to January 1, 2015.

(i)

Excludes unrealized gains and losses.

(j)

Upon adoption of ASU 2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $33, $34, $28 and $52, respectively, of average debt issuance costs from average other assets to average long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(k)

Ratios not restated for the adoption of the amended guidance of ASU 2015-03 “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

 

1531  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

OVERVIEW

 

Fifth Third Bancorp is a diversified financial services company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. At December 31, 2014, the Bancorp had $138.7 billion in assets, operated 15 affiliates with 1,302 full-service Banking Centers, including 101 Bank Mart® locations open seven days a week inside select grocery stores, and 2,638 ATMs in 12 states throughout the Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the U.S. The Bancorp reports on four business segments: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending and Investment Advisors. The Bancorp also has an approximate 23% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC. The carrying value of the Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC was $394 million as of December 31, 2014.

This overview of MD&A highlights selected information in the financial results of the Bancorp and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of trends, events, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources and critical accounting policies and estimates, you should carefully read this entire document. Each of these items could have an impact on the Bancorp’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, seerefer to the Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms in this report for a list of terms included as a tool for the reader of this annual report on Form 10-K. The abbreviations and acronyms identified therein are used throughout this MD&A, as well as the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Bancorp believes that banking is first and foremost a relationship business where the strength of the competition and challenges for growth can vary in every market. The Bancorp believes its affiliate operating model provides a competitive advantage by emphasizing individual relationships. Through its affiliate operating model, individual managers at all levels within the affiliates are given the opportunity to tailor financial solutions for their customers.

Net interest income, net interest margin and the efficiency ratio are presented in MD&A on aan FTE basis. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax-favored status of income from certain loans and securities held by the Bancorp that are not taxable for federal income tax purposes. The Bancorp believes this presentation to be the preferred industry measurement of net interest income as it provides a relevant comparison between taxable and non-taxable amounts. The FTE basis for presenting net interest income is a non-GAAP measure. For further information, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

The Bancorp’s revenues are dependent on both net interest income and noninterest income. For the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, net interest income on aan FTE basis and noninterest income provided 59%57% and 41%43% of total revenue, respectively. The Bancorp derives the majority of its revenues within the U.S. from customers domiciled in the United States. Revenue from foreign countries and external customers domiciled in foreign countries was immaterial to the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Changes in interest rates, credit quality, economic trends and the capital markets are primary factors that drive the performance of the Bancorp. As discussed later in the Risk Management section of MD&A, risk identification, measurement, monitoring, control and reporting are important to the management of risk and to the financial performance and capital strength of the Bancorp.

Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on assets such as loans, leases and securities, and interest expense incurred on liabilities such as deposits, other short-term borrowings and long-term debt. Net interest income is affected by the general level of interest rates, the relative level of short-term and long-term interest rates, changes in interest rates and changes in the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Generally, the rates of interest the Bancorp earns on its assets and pays on its liabilities are established for a period of

time. The change in market interest rates over time exposes the Bancorp to interest rate risk through potential adverse changes to net interest income and financial position. The Bancorp manages this risk by continually analyzing and adjusting the composition of its assets and liabilities based on their payment streams and interest rates, the timing of their maturities and their sensitivity to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, the Bancorp enters into certain derivative transactions as part of its overall strategy to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks. The Bancorp is also exposed to the risk of losses on its loan and lease portfolio as a result of changing expected cash flows caused by borrower credit events, such as loan defaults and inadequate collateral due to a weakened economy within the Bancorp’s footprint.

Noninterest income is derived from service charges on deposits, corporate banking revenue, investment advisorywealth and asset management revenue, card and processing revenue, mortgage banking net revenue, card and processing revenuesecurities gains, net and other noninterest income.

Noninterest expense is primarily driven byincludes personnel costs, net occupancy expenses,expense, technology and communication costs, card and processing expense, equipment expense and other noninterest expense.

Vantiv, Inc. Share Saleand Vantiv Holding, LLC Transactions

On July 27, 2016, the Bancorp entered into an agreement with Vantiv, Inc. under which a portion of its TRA with Vantiv, Inc. was terminated and settled in full for consideration of a cash payment in the amount of $116 million from Vantiv, Inc. Under the agreement, the Bancorp terminated and settled certain TRA cash flows it expected to receive in the years 2019 to 2035, totaling an estimated $331 million. The Bancorp’s ownership positionBancorp recognized a gain of $116 million in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income from this settlement in 2016.

Additionally, the agreement provides that Vantiv, Inc. may be obligated to pay up to a total of approximately $171 million to the Bancorp to terminate and settle certain remaining TRA cash flows, totaling an estimated $394 million, upon the exercise of certain call options by Vantiv, Inc. or certain put options by the Bancorp. If the associated call options or put options are exercised, 10% of the obligations would be settled with respect to each quarter in 2017 and 15% of the obligations would be settled with respect to each quarter in 2018. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $164 million in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income in 2016 associated with these options. This agreement did not impact the TRA payments recognized in the fourth quarter of 2016 and is not expected to impact the TRA payment expected in the fourth quarter of 2017.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Bancorp exercised its right to purchase approximately 7.8 million Class C Units underlying the warrant at the $15.98 strike price. This exercise was settled on a net basis for approximately 5.7 million Class C Units, which were then exchanged for approximately 5.7 million shares of Vantiv, Inc. Class A Common Stock of which 4.8 million shares were sold in a secondary offering and 0.9 million shares were repurchased by Vantiv, Inc. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $9 million in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income in 2016 on the exercise of the remaining warrant in Vantiv Holding, LLC was reducedLLC.

Branch Consolidations and Sales Activity

The Bancorp monitors changing customer preferences associated with the channels it uses for banking transactions to evaluate the efficiency, competitiveness and quality of the customer service experience in its consumer distribution network. As part of this ongoing assessment, the Bancorp may determine that it is no longer fully committed to maintaining full-service branches at certain of its existing banking center locations. Similarly, the Bancorp may also determine that it is no longer fully committed to building banking centers on certain parcels of land which had previously been held for future branch expansion. On June 16, 2015, the Bancorp’s Board of Directors authorized management to pursue a plan to further develop its distribution strategy, including a plan to consolidate and/or sell certain operating branch locations and to sell certain parcels of undeveloped land that had been acquired by the Bancorp for future branch expansion (the “Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan”). In addition, the Bancorp announced on September 13, 2016 that it had identified an additional 44 branch locations and 5 parcels of undeveloped land that it planned to consolidate or sell.

On January 29, 2016, the Bancorp closed the previously announced sale in the second quarterSt. Louis MSA to Great Southern Bank and recorded a gain on the sale of 2014 when$8 million in other noninterest income.

32  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Additionally, on April 22, 2016, the Bancorp sold an approximate three percent interest and recognized a $125 million gain. The Bancorp’s remaining approximate 23% ownership in Vantiv Holding, LLC was accounted for as an equity method investmentclosed the previously announced sale in the Bancorp’sPittsburgh MSA to First National Bank of Pennsylvania and recorded a gain on the sale of $11 million in other noninterest income. Both transactions were part of the Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan.

As of December 31, 2016, the Bancorp had 64 branch locations and 35 parcels of undeveloped land that had been acquired for future branch expansion that it intended to consolidate or sell. These branch locations and parcels of undeveloped land, which include unsold properties from the Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan as well as properties included in the September 13, 2016 announcement, represent $39 million, $16 million and $1 million of land and improvements, buildings and equipment, respectively, included in bank premises and equipment in the Consolidated Financial Statements and had a carrying value of $394 millionBalance Sheets as of December 31, 2014.2016, of which $29 million, $9 million and $1 million, respectively, were classified as held for sale. The Bancorp expects to receive approximately $72 million in annual savings from operating expenses upon completion of the Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan and the consolidation and/or sale of properties included in the September 13, 2016 announcement. Approximately $60 million of the $72 million in total estimated annual savings are attributable to branches that were closed prior to December 31, 2016. For morefurther information, refer to Note 197 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

On September 29, 2016, the Bancorp closed on the sale of an office complex. The sale also included all of the Bancorp’s rights, title and interest as a landlord under existing leases in the complex. Under the terms of the transaction, the Bancorp received proceeds of approximately $31 million and entered into a lease agreement whereby the Bancorp leased-back approximately 25% of the office complex. In conjunction with the transaction, which qualified as a sale-leaseback under U.S. GAAP, the Bancorp retired assets with a net book value of approximately $10 million, recognized a deferred gain of $10 million, which is being amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the 15 year lease term, and recorded a gain on the transaction of $11 million in other noninterest income.

NorthStar Strategy

In the third quarter of 2016, the Bancorp launched the NorthStar Strategy, a three-year plan designed to achieve the Bancorp’s

vision to be the One Bank people most value and trust and deliver strong, consistent returns through longer term economic cycles.

The strategy is designed to impact every line of business, every employee and, most importantly, every customer. The Bancorp is focused on:

Building a differentiated brand and corporate reputation by improving the customer experience, increasing brand equity and delivering on the Bancorp’s $30 billion community commitment.

Delivering a better, more differentiated value proposition by investing in our sales and service channels and expanding on our products, solutions and expertise.

Generating returns on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) of 12% to 14%, a return on average assets of 1.1% to 1.3% and an efficiency ratio below 60% by the end of 2019.

Achieving risk and operational excellence.

The Bancorp has implemented several initiatives to assist in achieving these goals, including the following: our partnership with GreenSky, upgrades to our mortgage and teller systems, expansion of credit card and treasury management products, focused growth in asset-based lending and our commercial verticals and acceleration of our automation and robotics initiatives.

Accelerated Share Repurchase Transactions

During 2013the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2014,2015, the Bancorp entered into or settled a number of accelerated share repurchase transactions. As part of these transactions, the Bancorp entered into forward contracts in which the final number of shares to be delivered at settlement was or will be based generally on a discount to the average daily volume-weighted averagevolume weighted-average price of the Bancorp’s common stock during the term of the Repurchase Agreement.repurchase agreements. For more information on the accounting for these instruments,accelerated share repurchase program, refer to Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For a summary of allthe Bancorp’s accelerated share repurchase transactions that were entered into or settled during 2013the years ended December 31, 2016 and 20142015, refer to Table 2. For further information on a subsequent event related to capital actions refer to Note 31 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.    

��

16Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF ACCELERATED SHARE REPURCHASE TRANSACTIONS

Repurchase Date    Amount ($ in millions)   Shares Repurchased on  
Repurchase Date  
Shares Received from Forward
Contract Settlement
Total Shares    
Repurchased    
Settlement Date      

November 9, 2012

$125 7,710,761657,9148,368,675February 12, 2013

December 19, 2012

 100 6,267,410127,7606,395,170February 27, 2013

January 31, 2013

 125 6,953,028849,0377,802,065April 5, 2013

May 24, 2013

 539 25,035,5194,270,25029,305,769October 1, 2013

November 18, 2013

 200 8,538,4231,132,4959,670,918March 5, 2014

December 13, 2013

 456 19,084,1952,294,93221,379,127March 31, 2014

January 31, 2014

 99 3,950,705602,1094,552,814March 31, 2014

May 1, 2014

 150 6,216,4801,016,5147,232,994July 21, 2014

July 24, 2014

 225 9,352,0781,896,68511,248,763October 14, 2014

October 23, 2014

 180 8,337,875794,2459,132,120January 8, 2015
TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF ACCELERATED SHARE REPURCHASE TRANSACTIONS    

 

Repurchase Date  

Amount        

($ in millions)        

   Shares Repurchased on  
Repurchase Date  
   Shares Received from Forward
Contract Settlement
   

 

Total Shares  
Repurchased  

   Settlement Date      

 

October 23, 2014

   180    8,337,875    794,245    9,132,120   January 8, 2015

January 27, 2015

   180    8,542,713    1,103,744    9,646,457   April 28, 2015

April 30, 2015

   155    6,704,835    842,655    7,547,490   July 31, 2015

August 3, 2015

   150    6,039,792    1,346,314    7,386,106   September 3, 2015

September 9, 2015

   150    6,538,462    1,446,613    7,985,075   October 23, 2015

December 14, 2015

   215    9,248,482    1,782,477    11,030,959   January 14, 2016

March 4, 2016

   240    12,623,762    1,868,379    14,492,141   April 11, 2016

August 5, 2016

   240    10,979,548    1,099,205    12,078,753   November 7, 2016

December 20, 2016

   155    4,843,750    1,044,362    5,888,112   February 6, 2017

 

 

Preferred Stock OfferingOpen Market Share Repurchase Transactions

Between June 17, 2016 and June 20, 2016, the Bancorp repurchased 1,436,100 shares, or approximately $26 million, of its outstanding common stock through open market repurchase transactions.

Senior and Subordinated Notes Offerings

On June 5, 2014,March 15, 2016, the Bancorp issued in a registered public offering 300,000 depositary shares, representing 12,000 shares of 4.90% fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative Series J perpetual preferred stock, for net proceeds of $297 million. The Series J preferred shares are not convertible into Bancorp common shares or any other securities. For more information, refer to Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Senior Notes Offerings

On February 28, 2014, the BancorpBank issued and sold $500$1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured bank notes. The bank notes consisted of $750 million of 2.30% unsecured senior fixed-rate notes with a maturity of five years, due on March 1, 2019.15, 2019; and $750 million of 3.85% subordinated fixed-rate notes due on March 15, 2026. These bank notes will be

redeemable by the Bancorp,Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On April 25, 2014,June 14, 2016, the Bank issued and sold $1.5$1.3 billion in aggregate principal amount of 2.25% unsecured senior bank notes. The bank notes consisted of $850 million of 2.375% senior fixed-rate notes with a maturity of five years, due on April 25, 2019; and $650 million of 1.35% senior fixed-rate notes with a maturity of three years, due on June 1, 2017.14, 2021. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On September 5, 2014,27, 2016, the Bank issued and sold $850$1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior bank notes due on September 27, 2019.

33  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The bank notes consisted of $750 million of 2.875% unsecured1.625% senior fixed-rate bank notes withand $250 million of senior floating-rate notes at three-month LIBOR plus 59 bps. The Bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate notes to a maturityfloating-rate, which resulted in an effective interest rate of seven years, due on October 1, 2021.three-month LIBOR plus 53 bps. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date. For additional information on the senior notes offerings, refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Automobile Loan Securitizations

In securitization transactions that occurred in 2014, the Bancorp transferred an aggregate amount of approximately $3.8 billion in fixed-rate consumer automobile loans to bankruptcy remote trusts which were deemed to be VIEs. The Bancorp concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of these VIEs and, therefore, has consolidated these VIEs. For additional information on the automobile loan securitizations, refer to Notes 10 and 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Legislative Developments

On July 21, 2010, the DFA was signed into federal law. This act implements changes to the financial services industry and affects the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The legislation established the CFPB responsible for implementing and enforcing compliance with consumer financial laws, changes the methodology for determining deposit insurance assessments, gives the FRB the ability to regulate and limit interchange rates charged to merchants for the use of debit cards, enacts new limitations on proprietary trading, broadens the scope of derivative instruments subject to regulation, requires on-going stress tests and the submission of annual capital plans for certain organizations, requires changes to rules governing regulatory capital ratios and requires enhanced liquidity standards.Regulatory Developments

The FRB launchedconducted a regularly scheduled examination covering 2011 through 2013 to determine the 2014 capital planningBank’s compliance with the CRA. This CRA examination resulted in a rating of “Needs to Improve.” The Bank believes that the “Needs to Improve” rating reflects legacy issues that have been remediated during the intervening three years. While the Bank’s CRA rating is “Needs to Improve” the Bancorp and stress testing program, CCAR,the Bank face limitations and conditions on November 1, 2013. The CCAR program requires BHCscertain activities, including the commencement of new activities and merger with $50 billion or moreacquisitions of total consolidated assets to submit annual capital plans toother financial institutions. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the FRB for review and to conduct stress tests underbegan a number of economic scenarios. The capital plan and stress testing results were submitted by the Bancorp to the FRB on January 6, 2014.

In March of 2014, the FRB disclosed its estimates of participating institutions results under the FRB supervisory stress scenario, including capital results, which assume all banks take certain consistently applied future capital actions. In addition, the FRB disclosed its estimates of participating institutions results under the FRB supervisory severe stress scenarios including capital results based on each company’s own base scenario capital actions.

On March 26, 2014, the Bancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the FRB as partCRA examination of the 2014 CCAR. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the following capital actions for the period beginning April 1, 2014 and ending March 31, 2015:

The potential increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $0.13 per share;

The potential repurchase of common shares in an amount up to $669 million;

The additional ability to repurchase shares in the amount of any after-tax gains from the sale of Vantiv, Inc. common stock; and

The issuance of an additional $300 million in preferred stock.

Bank. For morefurther information, on the 2014 CCAR results, refer to the Capital Management sectionRegulation and Supervision subsection of MD&A.Part I, Item 1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

17  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

TABLE 3: CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME                    

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions, except per share data)  2016  2015      2014       2013      2012        

 

 

Interest income (FTE)

 

  $      4,218   4,049   4,051    3,993   4,125  

Interest expense

   578   495   451    412   512  

 

 

Net Interest Income (FTE)

 

   3,640   3,554   3,600    3,581   3,613  

Provision for loan and lease losses

   343   396   315    229   303  

 

 

Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan and Lease Losses (FTE)

 

   3,297   3,158   3,285    3,352   3,310  

Noninterest income

 

   2,696   3,003   2,473    3,227   2,999  

Noninterest expense

   3,903   3,775   3,709    3,961   4,081  

 

 

Income Before Income Taxes (FTE)

 

   2,090   2,386   2,049    2,618   2,228  

Fully taxable equivalent adjustment

 

   25   21   21    20   18  

Applicable income tax expense

   505   659   545    772   636  

 

 

Net Income

 

   1,560   1,706   1,483    1,826   1,574  

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (4  (6  2    (10  (2 

 

 

Net Income Attributable to Bancorp

 

   1,564   1,712   1,481    1,836   1,576  

Dividends on preferred stock

   75   75   67    37   35  

 

 

Net Income Available to Common Shareholders

  $1,489   1,637   1,414    1,799   1,541  

 

 

Earnings per share - basic

 

  $1.95   2.03   1.68    2.05   1.69  

Earnings per share - diluted

  $1.93   2.01   1.66    2.02   1.66  

 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

  $0.53   0.52   0.51    0.47   0.36  

 

 

 

The BHCs that participated in the 2014 CCAR, including the Bancorp, were required to conduct mid-cycle company-run stress tests using data as of March 31, 2014. The stress tests must be based on three BHC defined economic scenarios – baseline, adverse and severely adverse. As required, the Bancorp reported the mid-cycle stress test results to the FRB on July 7, 2014. In addition, the Bancorp published a Form 8-K providing a summary of the results under the severely adverse scenario on September 18, 2014, which is available on Fifth Third’s website athttps://www.53.com. These results represented estimates of the Bancorp’s results from the second quarter of 2014 through the second quarter of 2016 under the severely adverse scenario, which is considered highly unlikely to occur.

Fifth Third offers qualified deposit customers a deposit advance product if they choose to avail themselves of this product to meet short-term, small-dollar financial needs. In April of 2013, the CFPB issued a “White Paper” which studied financial services industry offerings and customer use of deposit advance products as well as payday loans and is considering whether rules governing these products are warranted. At the same time, the OCC and FDIC each issued proposed supervisory guidance for public comment to institutions they supervise which supplements existing OCC and FDIC guidance, detailing the principles they expect financial institutions to follow in connection with deposit advance products and supervisory expectations for the use of deposit advance products. The Federal Reserve also issued a statement in April of 2013 to state member banks like Fifth Third for whom the Federal Reserve is the primary regulator. This statement encouraged state member banks to respond to customers’ small-dollar credit needs in a responsible manner; emphasized that they should take into consideration the risks associated with deposit advance products, including potential consumer harm and potential elevated compliance risk; and reminded them that these product offerings must comply with applicable laws and regulations.

Fifth Third’s deposit advance product is designed to fully comply with the applicable federal and state laws and use of this product is subject to strict eligibility requirements and advance restriction guidelines to limit dependency on this product as a borrowing source. The Bancorp’s deposit advance balances are included in other consumer loans and leases in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and represent substantially all of the revenue reported in interest and fees on other consumer loans and leases in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Statements of Income and in Table 8 in the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A. On January 17, 2014, given developments in industry practice, Fifth Third announced that it would no longer enroll new customers in its deposit advance product and expected to phase out the service to existing customers by the end of 2014. To avoid a disruption to its existing customers during the extension period while the banking industry awaits further regulatory guidance on the deposit advance product, on November 3, 2014, Fifth Third announced changes to its current deposit advance product for existing customers beginning January 1, 2015, including a lower transaction fee, an extended repayment period and a reduced maximum advance period. The Bancorp currently expects to continue to offer the service to existing deposit advance customers until further regulatory guidance is provided. The Bancorp currently expects these changes to the deposit advance product to negatively impact net interest income by approximately $100 million in 2015.

In December of 2010 and revised in June of 2011, the BCBS issued Basel III, a global regulatory framework, to enhance international capital standards. In June of 2012, U.S. banking regulators proposed enhancements to the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banks, which implement aspects of Basel III, such as re-defining the regulatory capital elements and minimum

capital ratios, introducing regulatory capital buffers above those minimums, revising the agencies’ rules for calculating risk-weighted assets and introducing a new Tier I common equity ratio. In July of 2013, U.S. banking regulators approved the final enhanced regulatory capital rules (Basel III Final Rule), which included modifications to the proposed rules. The Bancorp continues to evaluate the Basel III Final Rule and its potential impact. For more information on the impact of the regulatory capital enhancements, refer to the Capital Management section of MD&A. Refer to the Non-GAAP section of MD&A for an estimate of the Basel III Tier I common equity ratio.

On December 10, 2013, the banking agencies finalized section 619 of the DFA, known as the Volcker Rule, which became effective April 1, 2014. Though the final rule was effective April 1, 2014, the FRB granted the industry an extension of time until July 21, 2015 to conform certain of its activities related to proprietary trading to comply with the Volcker Rule. In addition, the FRB granted the industry an extension of time until July 21, 2016, and announced its intention to grant a one year extension of the conformance period until July 21, 2017, to conform certain ownership interests in, sponsorship activities of and relationships with private equity or hedge funds as well as holding certain collateralized loan obligations that were in place as of December 31, 2013. It is possible that additional conformance period extensions could be granted either to the entire industry, or, upon request, to requesting banking organizations on a case-by-case basis. The final rule prohibits banks and bank holding companies from engaging in short-term proprietary trading of certain securities, derivatives, commodity futures and options on these instruments for their own account. The Volcker Rule also restricts banks and their affiliated entities from owning, sponsoring or having certain relationships with private equity and hedge funds, as well as holding certain collateralized loan obligations that are deemed to contain ownership interests. Exemptions are provided for certain activities such as underwriting, market making, hedging, trading in certain government obligations and organizing and offering a hedge fund or private equity fund. Fifth Third does not sponsor any private equity or hedge funds that, under the final rule, it is prohibited from sponsoring. As of December 31, 2014, the Bancorp held no collateralized loan obligations. As of December 31, 2014, the Bancorp had approximately $165 million in interests and approximately $60 million in binding commitments to invest in private equity funds that are affected by the Volcker Rule. It is expected that over time the Bancorp may need to sell or redeem these investments, however no formal plan to sell has been approved as of December 31, 2014. As a result of the announced conformance period extension, the Bancorp believes it is likely that these investments will be reduced over time in the ordinary course of events before compliance is required.

On October 10, 2014, the U.S. Banking Agencies published final rules implementing a quantitative liquidity requirement consistent with the LCR standard established by the BCBS for large internationally active banking organizations, generally those with $250 billion or more in total consolidated assets or $10 billion or more in on-balance sheet foreign exposure. In addition, a modified LCR requirement was implemented for BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets but that are not internationally active, such as Fifth Third. The modified LCR is effective January 1, 2016 and requires BHCs to calculate its LCR on a monthly basis. Refer to the Liquidity Risk Management section of MD&A for further discussion on these ratios.

On July 31, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs in a case challenging certain provisions of the FRB’s rule concerning electronic debit card transaction fees and network

18  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

exclusivity arrangements (the “Current Rule”) that were adopted to implement Section 1075 of the DFA, known as the Durbin Amendment. The Court held that, in adopting the Current Rule, the FRB violated the Durbin Amendment’s provisions concerning which costs are allowed to be taken into account for purposes of setting fees that are reasonable and proportional to the costs incurred by the issuer and therefore the Current Rule’s maximum permissible fees were too high. In addition, the Court held that the Current Rule’s network non-exclusivity provisions concerning unaffiliated payment networks for debit cards also violated the Durbin Amendment. The Court vacated the Current Rule, but stayed its ruling to provide the FRB an opportunity to replace the

invalidated portions. The FRB appealed this decision and on March 21, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. The merchants have filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, on January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the Circuit Court reversal, thereby largely upholding the Current Rule and substantially reducing uncertainty surrounding debit card interchange fees the Bancorp is permitted to charge. Refer to the Noninterest Income subsection of the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A for further information regarding the Bancorp’s debit card interchange revenue.

19  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

TABLE 3: CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME               

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions, except per share data)

 2014   2013   2012   2011   2010        

Interest income (FTE)

$4,051  3,993  4,125  4,236  4,507       

Interest expense

 451  412  512  661  885       

Net interest income (FTE)

 3,600  3,581  3,613  3,575  3,622       

Provision for loan and lease losses

 315  229  303  423  1,538       

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses (FTE)

 3,285  3,352  3,310  3,152  2,084       

Noninterest income

 2,473  3,227  2,999  2,455  2,729       

Noninterest expense

 3,709  3,961  4,081  3,758  3,855       

Income before income taxes (FTE)

 2,049  2,618  2,228  1,849  958       

Fully taxable equivalent adjustment

 21  20  18  18  18       

Applicable income tax expense

 545  772  636  533  187       

Net income

 1,483  1,826  1,574  1,298  753       

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 2  (10 (2 1  -       

Net income attributable to Bancorp

 1,481  1,836  1,576  1,297  753       

Dividends on preferred stock

 67  37  35  203  250       

Net income available to common shareholders

$      1,414  1,799  1,541  1,094  503       

Earnings per share - basic

$1.68  2.05  1.69  1.20  0.63       

Earnings per share - diluted

 1.66  2.02  1.66  1.18  0.63       

Cash dividends declared per common share

$0.51  0.47  0.36  0.28  0.04       

Earnings Summary

The Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20142016 was $1.4$1.5 billion, or $1.66$1.93 per diluted share, which was net of $67$75 million in preferred stock dividends. The Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20132015 was $1.8$1.6 billion, or $2.02$2.01 per diluted share, which was net of $37$75 million in preferred stock dividends. Pre-provision net revenue was $2.3$2.4 billion and $2.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Pre-provision net revenue is a non-GAAP measure. For further information, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section in theof MD&A.

Net interest income on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) was $3.6 billion for both the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015. Net interest income was positively impacted by an increaseincreases in average taxable securities of $5.4$3.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014 coupled with an increase in yields on these securities of 16 bps compared to the prior year. In addition, net interest income also included the benefit of an increase inand average loans and leases and a decrease in the rates paid on long-term debt compared to the prior year, partially offset by lower yields on loans and leases and an increase in average long-term debt. The net interest rate spread decreased to 2.94% in 2014 from 3.15% in 2013 primarily due to a 21 bps decrease in yields on average interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2014. Net interest margin was 3.10% and 3.32% for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Noninterest income decreased $754 million, or 23%, in 2014 compared to 2013. The decrease from the prior year was primarily due to decreases in mortgage banking net revenue and other noninterest income. Mortgage banking net revenue decreased $390of $981 million for the year ended December 31, 20142016 compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, net interest income was positively impacted by the decision of the Federal Open Market Committee to raise the target range of the federal funds rate 25 bps to 50 bps in 2015 and 25 bps to 75 bps in 2016. These positive impacts were partially offset by an increase in average long-term debt of $750 million coupled with a decrease in the net interest rate spread to 2.66% during the year ended December 31, 2016 from 2.69% during the year ended December 31, 2015. Net interest margin on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) was 2.88% for the both years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

        Noninterest income decreased $307 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to decreases in origination feesother noninterest income and gains on loan sales andmortgage banking net mortgage servicingrevenue partially offset by an increase in corporate banking revenue. Other noninterest income decreased $429$291 million compared tofrom the prior year.year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease included the impact of a gain of $125$331 million on the sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares in the second quarter of 2014, compared to gains totaling $327 million during the second and third quarters of 2013. The Bancorp recognized gains of $23 million and $9 million associated with a tax receivable agreement with Vantiv, Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively. Additionally, other noninterest income decreased for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to decreases in the2015. The Bancorp recognized positive valuation adjustments on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv

Holding, LLC and a decrease in equity method earnings from Vantiv Holding, LLC.

Noninterest expense decreased $252 million, or six percent, in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to decreases in total personnel costs and other noninterest expense. Total personnel costs decreased $155 million in 2014 compared to 2013 driven by a decrease in incentive compensation primarily in the mortgage business due to lower production levels and a decrease in base compensation and employee benefits as a result of a decline in the number of full-time equivalent employees. Other noninterest expense decreased $125 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to decreases in loan and lease expense, FDIC insurance and other taxes, losses and adjustments, marketing expense, debt extinguishment costs and an increase in the benefit from the reserve for unfunded commitments, partially offset by an increase in impairment on affordable housing investments.

Credit Summary

The provision for loan and lease losses was $315$64 million and $229$236 million for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Net charge-offs asIn addition to valuation adjustments, during the fourth quarter of 2015, the Bancorp recognized a percentgain of average portfolio loans$89 million on both the sale and leases increased to 0.64%exercise of a portion of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC compared with a gain of $9 million on the sale of the remaining warrant in Vantiv Holding, LLC during 20142016. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in income from the TRAs associated with Vantiv, Inc. of $233 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 0.58%the same period in the prior year and a decrease in net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment of $88 million during 2013. Atthe year ended December 31, 2014, nonperforming assets as2016 compared with the same period in the prior year. Mortgage banking net revenue decreased $63 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a percent of loans, leasesdecrease in net mortgage servicing revenue, partially offset by an increase in origination fees and other assets, including OREO (excluding nonaccrual loans heldgains on loan sales. Corporate banking revenue increased $48 million for sale) decreased to 0.82%,the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 1.10% atthe year ended December 31, 2013. For further discussion on2015 primarily driven by increases in syndication fees and lease remarketing fees, partially offset by decreases in letter of credit quality, refer to the Credit Risk Management section in MD&A.

Capital Summary

The Bancorp’s capital ratios exceed the “well-capitalized” guidelines as defined by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. As of December 31, 2014, the Tier I risk-based capital ratio was 10.83%, the Tier I leverage ratio was 9.66%fees and the Total risk-based capital ratio was 14.33%.foreign exchange fees.

 

 

2034  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Noninterest expense increased $128 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to increases in personnel costs, technology and communications expense and other noninterest expense partially offset by decreases in net occupancy expense and card and processing expense. Personnel costs increased $103 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 driven by an increase in base compensation, variable compensation, and higher retirement and severance costs related to the Bancorp’s voluntary early retirement program. Technology and communications expense increased $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 driven primarily by increased investment in information technology associated with regulatory and compliance initiatives, system maintenance and other growth initiatives. Other noninterest expense increased $64 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to increases in FDIC insurance and other taxes, impairment on affordable housing investments, the provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments, losses and adjustments and operating lease expense. These increases were partially offset by decreases in travel expense, professional service fees and loan and lease expense. Card and processing expense decreased $21 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to the impact of renegotiated service contracts.

For more information on net interest income, noninterest income and noninterest expense, refer to the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A.

Credit Summary

The provision for loan and lease losses was $343 million and $396 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net losses charged-off as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreased to 0.39% during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 0.48% during the year ended December 31, 2015. At December 31, 2016, nonperforming portfolio assets as a percent of portfolio loans and leases and OREO increased to 0.80% compared to 0.70% at December 31, 2015. For further discussion on credit quality, refer to the Credit Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A.

Capital Summary

The Bancorp’s capital ratios exceed the “well-capitalized” guidelines as defined by the PCA requirements of the U.S. banking agencies. As of December 31, 2016, as calculated under the Basel III transition provisions, the CET1 capital ratio was 10.39%, the Tier I risk-based capital ratio was 11.50%, the Total risk-based capital ratio was 15.02% and the Tier I leverage ratio was 9.90%.

35  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

 

The following are Non-GAAPnon-GAAP measures which are important to the reader of the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements but should be supplemental to primary U.S. GAAP measures.

The Bancorp considers many factors when determiningFTE basis adjusts for the adequacytax-favored status of its liquidity profile, including its LCR as definedincome from certain loans and securities held by the U.S. Banking Agencies Basel III LCR final rule. Generally, the LCR is designed to ensure banks maintain an adequate level of unencumbered HQLA to satisfy the estimated net cash outflows under a 30-day stress scenario. The Bancorp will be subject to the Modified LCR wherebythat are not

the net cash outflow under the 30-day stress scenario is multiplied by a factor of 0.7. The final rule is not effectivetaxable for the Bancorp until January 1, 2016.federal income tax purposes. The Bancorp believes there is no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measurethis presentation to LCR. The Bancorp believes providing an estimated LCR is important for comparability to other financial institutions. Forbe the preferred industry measurement of net interest income as it provides a further discussion on liquidity managementrelevant comparison between taxable and the LCR, refer to the Liquidity Risk Management section of MD&A.non-taxable amounts.

 

 

TABLE 4: Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Liquidity Coverage Ratio
As of ($ in millions)

        December 3

      2014

1, 

High Quality Liquid Assets

$      22,162

Estimated net cash outflow

19,831

Estimated Modified LCR

112 %   

The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measures of net interest income on an FTE basis, net interest margin and the efficiency ratio to U.S. GAAP:

TABLE 4: NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES - NET INTEREST INCOME ON AN FTE BASIS, NET INTEREST MARGIN AND
EFFICIENCY RATIO
 

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  2016       2015          

 

 

Net interest income (U.S. GAAP)

  $            3,615    3,533   

 

Add: FTE adjustment

   25    21   

 

 

Net interest income on an FTE basis (1)

  $3,640    3,554   

Noninterest income (2)

 

  $2,696    3,003   

Noninterest expense (3)

 

   3,903    3,775   

Average interest-earning assets (4)

   126,285    123,584   

Ratios:

 

      

Net interest margin (1) / (4)

 

   2.88    2.88   

Efficiency ratio (3) / (1) + (2)

   61.6     57.6   

 

 

The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure of income before income taxes on an FTE basis to U.S. GAAP:

 
TABLE 5: NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE - INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES ON AN FTE BASIS 

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  2016       2015          

 

 

Income before income taxes (U.S. GAAP)

 

  $2,065     2,365   

Add: FTE adjustment

   25     21   

 

 

Income before income taxes on an FTE basis

  $2,090     2,386   

 

 

 

Pre-provision net revenue is net interest income plus noninterest income minus noninterest expense. The Bancorp believes this

measure is important because it provides a ready view of the Bancorp’s pre-tax earnings before the impact of provision expense.

 

The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure of pre-provision net revenue to U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31:GAAP:

 

TABLE 5: Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Pre-Provision Net Revenue        
($ in millions)2014 2013   
TABLE 6: NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE - PRE-PROVISION NET REVENUE          

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  2016           2015       

Net interest income (U.S. GAAP)

$            3,579  3,561    $            3,615       3,533  

Add: Noninterest income

 2,473  3,227     2,696       3,003  

Less: Noninterest expense

 3,709   3,961      (3,903)      (3,775 

Pre-provision net revenue

$2,343        2,827     $2,408       2,761  

 

The Bancorp believes return on average tangible common equity is an important measure for comparative purposes with other financial

institutions, but is not defined under U.S. GAAP, and therefore is considered a non-GAAP financial measure. This measure is useful for evaluating the performance of a business as it

calculates the return available to common shareholders without the impact of intangible assets and their related amortization.

 

The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure of return on average tangible common equity to U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31:

36  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

TABLE 6: Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Return on Average Tangible Common Equity        
($ in millions)2014 2013   

Net income available to common shareholders (U.S. GAAP)

$1,414  1,799  

Add: Intangible amortization, net of tax

 3  5   

Tangible net income available to common shareholders (1)

$1,417  1,804  

Average Bancorp’s shareholders’ equity (U.S. GAAP)

$15,290  14,302  

Less: Average preferred stock

 (1,205 (604

          Average goodwill

 (2,416 (2,416

          Average intangible assets and other servicing rights

 (20 (29 

Average Tangible common equity (2)

$            11,649  11,253 

Return on average tangible common equity (1) / (2)

 12.2 %  16.0   

The following table reconciles the non-GAAP financial measure of return on average tangible common equity to U.S. GAAP:

TABLE 7: NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE - RETURN ON AVERAGE TANGIBLE COMMON EQUITY    

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)       2016   2015          

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders (U.S. GAAP)

  $1,489    1,637  

Add: Intangible amortization, net of tax

   1    2  

 

 

Tangible net income available to common shareholders (1)

  $1,490    1,639  

Average Bancorp shareholders’ equity (U.S. GAAP)

  $          16,597    15,865  

Less: Average preferred stock

   (1,331   (1,331 

Average goodwill

   (2,416   (2,416 

Average intangible assets and other servicing rights

   (10   (14 

 

 

Average tangible common equity (2)

  $12,840    12,104  

Return on average tangible common equity (1) / (2)

   11.6  %    13.5  

 

 

 

The Bancorp considers various measures when evaluating capital utilization and adequacy, including the tangible equity ratio, tangible common equity ratio and Tier I common equity ratio,tangible book value per share, in addition to capital ratios defined by the U.S. banking regulators.agencies. These calculations are intended to complement the capital ratios defined by the U.S. banking regulatorsagencies for both absolute and comparative purposes. Because U.S. GAAP does not include capital ratio measures, the Bancorp believes there are no comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures to these ratios. These ratios are not formally defined by U.S. GAAP or codified in the federal banking regulations and, therefore, are considered to be non-GAAP financial measures. Additionally, the Bancorp became subject to the Basel III Final Rule on January 1, 2015 which defined various regulatory capital ratios including the CET1 ratio.

The CET1 capital ratio has transition provisions that will be phased out over time. The Bancorp is presenting the CET1 capital ratio on a fully phased-in basis for comparative purposes with other organizations. The Bancorp considers the fully phased-in CET1 ratio a non-GAAP measure since it is not the CET1 ratio in effect for the periods presented. Since analysts and the U.S. banking regulatorsagencies may assess the Bancorp’s capital adequacy using

these ratios, the Bancorp believes they are useful to provide investors the ability to assess its capital adequacy on the same basis.

The Bancorp believes these non-GAAP measures are important because they reflect the level of capital available to withstand unexpected market conditions. Additionally, presentation of these measures allows readers to compare certain aspects of the Bancorp’s capitalization to other organizations. However, because there are no standardized definitions for these ratios, the Bancorp’s calculations may not be comparable with other organizations, and the usefulness of these measures to investors may be limited. As a result, the Bancorp encourages readers to consider its Consolidated Financial Statements in their entirety and not to rely on any single financial measure.

 

 

21Fifth Third Bancorp

37  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

U.S. banking regulators approved final capital rules (Basel III Final Rule) in July of 2013 that substantially amend the existing risk-based capital rules (Basel I) for banks. The Bancorp believes providing an estimate of its capital position based upon the final rules is important to complement the existing capital ratios and for

comparability to other financial institutions. Since these rules are not effective for the Bancorp until January 1, 2015, they are considered non-GAAP measures and therefore are included in the following non-GAAP financial measures table.

 

The following table reconciles non-GAAP capital ratios to U.S. GAAP as of December 31:GAAP:

 

TABLE 7: Non-GAAP Financial Measures - Capital Ratios      
($ in millions)2014  2013          

Total Bancorp shareholders’ equity (U.S. GAAP)

$15,626   14,589          

Less:  Preferred stock

 (1,331)   (1,034)          

            Goodwill

 (2,416)   (2,416)          

            Intangible assets and other servicing rights

 (16)   (19)          

Tangible common equity, including unrealized gains / losses

 11,863   11,120          

Less:  Accumulated other comprehensive income

 (429)   (82)          

Tangible common equity, excluding unrealized gains / losses (1)

 11,434   11,038          

Add:   Preferred stock

 1,331   1,034          

Tangible equity (2)

 12,765   12,072          

Total assets (U.S. GAAP)

$        138,706   130,443          

Less:  Goodwill

 (2,416)   (2,416)          

            Intangible assets and other servicing rights

 (16)   (19)          

            Accumulated other comprehensive income, before tax

 (660)   (126)          

Tangible assets, excluding unrealized gains / losses (3)

$135,614   127,882          

Total Bancorp shareholders’ equity (U.S. GAAP)

$15,626   14,589          

Less:  Goodwill and certain other intangibles

 (2,476)   (2,492)          

            Accumulated other comprehensive income

 (429)   (82)          

Add:   Qualifying TruPS

 60   60          

            Other

 (17)   19          

Tier I risk-based capital

 12,764   12,094          

Less:  Preferred stock

 (1,331)   (1,034)          

            Qualifying TruPS

 (60)   (60)          

            Qualified noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiaries

 (1)   (37)          

Tier I common equity (4)

$11,372   10,963          

Risk-weighted assets (5)(a)

$117,878   115,969          

Ratios:

            Tangible equity (2) / (3)

 9.41  9.44          

            Tangible common equity (1) / (3)

 8.43  8.63          

            Tier I common equity (4) / (5)

 9.65  9.45          

Basel III Final Rule - Estimated Tier I common equity ratio

      

Tier I common equity (Basel I)

$11,372   10,963          

Add: Adjustment related to capital components(b)

 84   82          

Estimated Tier I common equity under Basel III Final Rule without AOCI (opt out) (6)

 11,456   11,045          

Add: Adjustment related to AOCI(c)

 429   82          

Estimated Tier I common equity under Basel III Final Rule with AOCI (non opt out) (7)

 11,885   11,127          

Estimated risk-weighted assets under Basel III Final Rule (8)(d)

 122,018   122,074          

Estimated Tier I common equity ratio under Basel III Final Rule (opt out) (6) / (8)

 9.39  9.05          

Estimated Tier I common equity ratio under Basel III Final Rule (non opt out) (7) / (8)

 9.74  9.12          
TABLE 8: NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES - CAPITAL RATIOS       

 

 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)        2016  2015               

 

 

Total Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity (U.S. GAAP)

  $              16,205   15,839    

Less:   Preferred stock

   (1,331  (1,331   

  Goodwill

   (2,416  (2,416   

  Intangible assets and other servicing rights

   (10  (13   

 

 

Tangible common equity, including unrealized gains / losses (1)

   12,448   12,079    

Less:   AOCI

   (59  (197   

 

 

Tangible common equity, excluding unrealized gains / losses (2)

   12,389   11,882    

Add:   Preferred stock

   1,331   1,331    

 

 

Tangible equity (3)

  $13,720   13,213    

 

 

Total Assets (U.S. GAAP)

  $142,177   141,048  (e)  

Less:   Goodwill

   (2,416  (2,416   

  Intangible assets and other servicing rights

   (10  (13   

  AOCI, before tax

   (91  (303   

 

 

Tangible assets, excluding unrealized gains / losses (4)

  $139,660   138,316    

 

 

Common shares outstanding (shares in millions) (5)

   750   785    

Ratios:

      

Tangible equity as a percentage of tangible assets (3) / (4)

   9.82 %   9.55    

Tangible common equity as a percentage of tangible assets (2) / (4)

   8.87   8.59    

Tangible book value per share (1) / (5)

  $16.60   15.39    

Basel III Final Rule - Transition to Fully Phased-In

      

 

 

CET1 capital (transitional)

  $12,426   11,917    

Less: Adjustments to CET1 capital from transitional to fully phased-in(a)

   (4  (8   

 

 

CET1 capital (fully phased-in) (6)

   12,422   11,909    

 

 

Risk-weighted assets (transitional)(b)

   119,632   121,290  (d)  

Add: Adjustments to risk-weighted assets from transitional to fully phased-in(c)

   1,115   1,178    

 

 

Risk-weighted assets (fully phased-in) (7)

  $120,747   122,468  (d)  

 

 

CET1 capital ratio under Basel III Final Rule (fully phased-in) (6) / (7)

   10.29 %   9.72  (d)  

 

 
(a)

Primarily relates to disallowed intangible assets (other than goodwill and MSRs, net of associated deferred tax liabilities).

(b)

Under the banking agencies’ risk-based capital guidelines, assets and credit equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet exposures are assigned to broad risk categories. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is multiplied by the associated risk-weight of the category. The resulting weighted values are added together, along with the measure for market risk, resulting in the Bancorp’s total risk-weighted assets.

(b)

Adjustments related to capital components include MSRs and deferred tax assets subject to threshold limitations and deferred tax liabilities related to intangible assets, which were deductions to capital under Basel I capital rules.

(c)

Under Basel III, non-advanced approach banks are permittedPrimarily relates to make a one-time election to opt out of the requirement to include AOCI in Tier I common equity.higher risk weighting for MSRs.

(d)

Key differences under Basel III inBalances not restated for the calculationadoption of risk-weighted assets comparedthe amended guidance of ASU 2015-03 “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” Refer to Basel I include: (1) Risk-weightingNote 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for commitments less than 1 year; (2) Higher risk-weighting for exposures to securitizations, past due loans, foreign banks and certain commercial real estate; (3) Higher risk-weighting for MSRs and deferred tax assets that are under certain thresholds as a percent of Tier I capital; and (4) Derivatives are differentiated between exchange clearing and over-the-counter and the 50% risk-weight cap is removed.further information.

(e)

Upon adoption of ASU 2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $34 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2238  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements provides a discussion of the significant new accounting standards adopted by

by the Bancorp during 20142016 and the expected impact of significant accounting standards issued, but not yet required to be adopted.

 

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Certain accounting policies require management to exercise judgment in determining methodologies, economic assumptions and estimates that may materially affect the Bancorp’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Bancorp’s critical accounting policies include the accounting for the ALLL, reserve for unfunded commitments, income taxes, valuation of servicing rights, fair value measurements, goodwill and legal contingencies. No material changes were made to the valuation techniques or models described below during the year ended December 31, 2014.2016.

ALLL

The Bancorp disaggregates its portfolio loans and leases into portfolio segments for purposes of determining the ALLL. The Bancorp’s portfolio segments include commercial, residential mortgage and consumer. The Bancorp further disaggregates its portfolio segments into classes for purposes of monitoring and assessing credit quality based on certain risk characteristics. Classes within the commercial portfolio segment include commercial and industrial, commercial mortgage owner-occupied, commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied, commercial construction, and commercial leasing. The residential mortgage portfolio segment is also considered a class. Classes within the consumer portfolio segment include home equity, automobile, credit card, and other consumer loans and leases. For an analysis of the Bancorp’s ALLL by portfolio segment and credit quality information by class, refer to Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Bancorp maintains the ALLL to absorb probable loan and lease losses inherent in its portfolio segments. The ALLL is maintained at a level the Bancorp considers to be adequate and is based on ongoing quarterly assessments and evaluations of the collectability and historical loss experience of loans and leases. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL. Provisions for loan and lease losses are based on the Bancorp’s review of the historical credit loss experience and such factors that, in management’s judgment, deserve consideration under existing economic conditions in estimating probable credit losses. The Bancorp’s strategy for credit risk management includes a combination of conservative exposure limits significantly below legal lending limits and conservative underwriting, documentation and collections standards. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on a geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit examinations and quarterly management reviews of large credit exposures and loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality.

The Bancorp’s methodology for determining the ALLL requires significant management judgement and is based on historical loss rates, current credit grades, specific allocation on loans modified in a TDR and impaired commercial credits above specified thresholds and other qualitative adjustments. Allowances on individual commercial loans, TDRs and historical loss rates are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as necessary based on changing borrower and/or collateral conditions and actual collection and charge-off experience. An unallocated allowance is maintained to recognize the imprecision in estimating and measuring losses when evaluating allowances for individual loans or pools of loans.

Larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $1 million that exhibit probable or

observed credit weaknesses, as well as loans that have been modified in a TDR, are subject to individual review for impairment. The Bancorp considers the current value of collateral, credit quality of any guarantees, the guarantor’s liquidity and willingness to cooperate, the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan is impaired. Other factors

may include the industry and geographic region of the borrower, size and financial condition of the borrower, cash flow and leverage of the borrower and the Bancorp’s evaluation of the borrower’s management. When individual loans are impaired, allowances are determined based on management’s estimate of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral and other sources of cash flow, as well as an evaluation of legal options available to the Bancorp. Allowances for impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, fair value of the underlying collateral or readily observable secondary market values. The Bancorp evaluates the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for a loss accrual.

Historical credit loss rates are applied to commercial loans that are not impaired or are impaired, but smaller than the established threshold of $1 million and thus not subject to specific allowance allocations. The loss rates are derived from a migration analysis,analyses for several portfolio stratifications, which trackstrack the historical net charge-off experience sustained on loans according to their internal risk grade. The risk grading system utilized for allowance analysis purposes encompasses ten categories.

Homogenous loans and leases in the residential mortgage and consumer portfolio segments are not individually risk graded. Rather, standard credit scoring systems and delinquency monitoring are used to assess credit risks and allowances are established based on the expected net charge-offs. Loss rates are based on the trailing twelve month net charge-off history by loan category. Historical loss rates may be adjusted for certain prescriptive and qualitative factors that, in management’s judgment, are necessary to reflect losses inherent in the portfolio. Factors that managementThe prescriptive loss rate factors include adjustments for delinquency trends, LTV trends and refreshed FICO score trends.

The Bancorp also considers qualitative factors in determining the analysisALLL. These include the effects of the national and local economies; trends in the nature and volume of delinquencies, charge-offs and nonaccrual loans;adjustments for changes in loan mix; credit score migration comparisons; asset quality trends;policies or procedures in underwriting, monitoring or collections, economic conditions, portfolio mix, lending and risk management personnel, results of internal audit and loan administration; changes inquality control reviews, collateral values and geographic concentrations. The Bancorp considers home price index trends when determining the internal lending policies and credit standards; collection practices; and examination results from bank regulatory agencies and the Bancorp’s internal credit reviewers.collateral value qualitative factor.

The Bancorp’s primary market areas for lending are the Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the United States.U.S. When evaluating the adequacy of allowances, consideration is given to these regional geographic concentrations and the closely associated effect changing economic conditions have on the Bancorp’s customers. Refer to the Allowance for Credit Losses subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A for a discussion on the Bancorp’s ALLL sensitivity analysis.

Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

The reserve for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities and is included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The determination of the adequacy of the reserve is based upon an evaluation of the unfunded credit facilities, including an assessment of historical commitment utilization experience, credit risk grading and historical loss rates based on credit grade migration. This process takes into consideration the same risk elements that are analyzed in the determination of the adequacy of the Bancorp’s ALLL, as previously discussed.

 

 

23Fifth Third Bancorp

39  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

analyzed in the determination of the adequacy of the Bancorp’s ALLL, as discussed above. Net adjustments to the reserve for unfunded commitments are included in other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Income Taxes

The Bancorp estimates income tax expense based on amounts expected to be owed tolaws of the various tax jurisdictions in which the Bancorp conducts business. On a quarterly basis, management assesses the reasonableness of its effective tax rate based upon its current estimate of the amountoperates are complex and components of net income, tax credits and the applicable statutory tax rates expected for the full year. The estimated income tax expense is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the balance sheet method and the net deferred tax asset or liability is reported in other assets or accrued taxes, interest and expenses, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and reflects enacted changes in tax rates and laws. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent they exist and aremay be subject to a valuation allowance based on management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis and includes an evaluation of all positive and negative evidence, such as the limitation on the use of any net operating losses, to determine whether realization is more likely than not.

Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due to taxing jurisdictions and are reported in accrued taxes, interest and expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.different interpretations. The Bancorp evaluates and assesses the relative risks and appropriate tax treatment of transactions and filing positions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and other information andinformation. The Bancorp maintains tax accruals consistent with its evaluation of these relative risks and merits. items.

Changes toin the estimate of accrued taxestax accruals occur periodically due to changes in tax rates, interpretationsinterpretation of tax laws and regulations, and other guidance issued by tax authorities and the status of examinations being conducted by taxingtax authorities, and changes to statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance that impact the relative risks of tax positions. These changes, when they occur, can affect deferred taxes and accrued taxes as well as the current period’sexpiration of statutes of limitations. These changes may significantly impact the Bancorp’s tax accruals, deferred taxes and income tax expense and can be significant tomay significantly impact the operating results of the Bancorp.

Deferred taxes are determined using the balance sheet method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is calculated based on the difference between the book and tax bases of the assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates and laws. Significant management judgment is required to determine the realizability of deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets are recognized when management believes that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Where management has determined that it is not more likely than not that certain deferred tax assets will be realized, a valuation allowance is maintained. For additional information on income taxes, refer to Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Valuation of Servicing Rights

When the Bancorp sells loans through either securitizations or individual loan sales in accordance with its investment policies, it often obtains servicing rights. Servicing rights resulting from loan sales are initially recorded at fair value and subsequently amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing revenue. Servicing rights are assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance and permanentother-than-temporary impairment recognized through a write-off of the servicing asset and related valuation allowance. KeySignificant management judgement is necessary to identify key economic assumptions used in measuring any potential impairment of the servicing rights includeincluding the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, the weighted-average life, the discount rateOAS spread and the weighted-average coupon rate, as applicable. The primary risk of material changes to the value of the servicing rights resides in the potential volatility in the economic assumptions used, particularly the prepayment speeds. The Bancorp monitors risk and adjusts its valuation allowance as necessary to adequately reserve for impairment in the servicing portfolio. In order to assist in this assessment, the Bancorp obtains external valuations of the MSR portfolio from third parties and participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the

reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the internal OAS model. For purposes of

measuring impairment, the mortgage servicing rightsMSRs are stratified into classes based on the financial asset type (fixed-rate vs. adjustable rate)adjustable-rate) and interest rates. For additional information on servicing rights, refer to Note 1112 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fair Value Measurements

The Bancorp measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Valuation techniques the Bancorp uses to measure fair value include the market approach, income approach and cost approach. The market approach uses prices or relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach involves discounting future amounts to a single present amount and is based on current market expectations about those future amounts. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of the asset.

U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the instrument’s fair value measurement. The three levels withinFor additional information on the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Bancorp has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability for which there is little, if any, market activity at the measurement date. Unobservable inputs reflect the Bancorp’s own assumptions about what market participants would use to price the asset or liability. The inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include the Bancorp’s own financial data such as internally developed pricing models and DCF methodologies, as well as instruments for which the fair value determination requires significant management judgment.measurements, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Bancorp’s fair value measurements involve various valuation techniques and models, which involve inputs that are observable, when available. Valuation techniques and parameters used for measuring assets and liabilities are reviewed and validated by the Bancorp on a quarterly basis. Additionally, the Bancorp monitors the fair values of significant assets and liabilities using a variety of methods including the evaluation of pricing runs and

24Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

exception reports based on certain analytical criteria, comparison to previous trades and overall review and assessments for reasonableness. The following is a summarylevel of valuation techniques utilized bymanagement judgement necessary to determine fair value varies based upon the Bancorp for its significant assets and liabilitiesmethods used in the determination of fair value. Financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Available-for-sale and trading securities

Whereusing quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1markets (Level 1) require minimal judgement. The valuation of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include government bonds and exchange traded equities. Iffinancial instruments when quoted market prices are not available then fair values are estimated using pricing models,(Levels 2 and 3) may require significant management judgement to assess whether quoted prices for similar instruments exist, the impact of securities with similar characteristics, or DCFs. Exampleschanging market conditions including reducing liquidity in the capital markets, and, the use of such instruments, which are classified within Level 2estimates surrounding significant unobservable inputs. Table 8 provides a summary of the valuation hierarchy, include federal agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, agency residential mortgage-backed securities, agency and non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities and other debt securities. Corporate bonds are included in asset-backed securities and other debt securities. Federal agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions, agency residential mortgage-backed securities, agency and non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities and other debt securities are generally valued using a market approach based on observable prices of securities with similar characteristics.

Residential mortgage loans held for sale and held for investment

For residential mortgage loans held for sale for which the fair value election has been made, fair value is estimated based upon mortgage-backed securities prices and spreads to those prices or, for certain ARM loans, DCF models that may incorporate the anticipated portfolio composition, credit spreads of asset-backed securities with similar collateral, and market conditions. The anticipated portfolio composition includes the effect of interest rate spreads and discount rates due to loan characteristics such as the state in which the loan was originated, the loan amount and the ARM margin. Residential mortgage loans held for sale that are valued based on mortgage-backed securities prices are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy as the valuation is based on external pricing for similar instruments. ARM loans classified as held for sale are also classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy due to the use of observable inputs in the DCF model. These observable inputs include interest rate spreads from agency mortgage-backed securities market rates and observable discount rates. For residential mortgage loans in which the fair value election has been made that are subsequently reclassified from held for sale to held for investment, the fair value estimation is based on mortgage-backed securities prices, interest rate risk and an internally developed credit component. Therefore, these loans are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Derivatives

Exchange-traded derivatives valued using quoted prices and certain over-the-counter derivatives valued using active bids are classified within Level 1 of the valuation

hierarchy. Most of the Bancorp’s derivative contracts are valued using DCF or other models that incorporate current market interest rates, credit spreads assigned to the derivative counterparties, and other market parameters and, therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such derivatives include basic and structured interest rate swaps and options. Derivatives that are valued based upon models with significant unobservable market parameters are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. At December 31, 2014, derivatives classified as Level 3, which are valued using an option-pricing model containing unobservable inputs, consisted primarily of the warrant associated with the initial sale of the Bancorp’s 51% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC to Advent International and a total return swap associated with the Bancorp’s sale of its Visa, Inc. Class B shares. Level 3 derivatives also include IRLCs, which utilize internally generated loan closing rate assumptions as a significant unobservable input in the valuation process.

In addition to the assets and liabilities measuredfinancial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis and the amounts of financial instruments valued using Level 3 inputs.

TABLE 9: FAIR VALUE SUMMARY     

 

 
As of ($ in millions)              December 31, 2016                          December 31, 2015              
   Balance          Level 3             Balance   Level 3           

 

 

Assets carried at fair value

  $               32,872   156    31,364    444   

As a percent of total assets

   23 %   -    22    -   

Liabilities carried at fair value

  $687   96    967    64   

As a percent of total liabilities

   1 %   -    1    -   

 

 

40  Fifth Third Bancorp measures servicing rights, certain loans and long-lived assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Refer to Note 27 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on fair value measurements.measurements including a description of the valuation methodologies used for significant financial instruments.

Goodwill

Business combinations entered into by the Bancorp typically include the acquisition of goodwill. U.S. GAAP requires goodwill to be tested for impairment at the Bancorp’s reporting unit level on an annual basis, which for the Bancorp is September 30, and more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. TheRefer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion on the methodology used by the Bancorp has determined that its segments qualify as reporting units under U.S. GAAP.to assess goodwill for impairment.

Impairment exists when a reporting unit’s carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. In testing goodwill for impairment, U.S. GAAP permits the Bancorp to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. In this qualitative assessment, the Bancorp evaluates events and circumstances which may include, but are not limited to, the general economic environment, banking industry and market conditions, the overall financial performance of the Bancorp, the performance of the Bancorp’s common stock, the key financial performance metrics of the Bancorp’s reporting units and events affecting the reporting units. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, the Bancorp determinesunits to determine if it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performingamount. If the two-step impairment test would be unnecessary. However, ifis required or the decision to bypass the qualitative assessment is elected, the Bancorp concludes otherwise, it would then be required to perform the first step (Step 1) of the goodwill impairment test and continue to the second step (Step 2), if necessary. Step 1 comparesby comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.

The fair value of a reporting unit is the price that would be received to sell the unit as a whole in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SinceAs none of the Bancorp’s reporting units are publicly traded, individual reporting unit fair value determinations cannot be directly correlated to the Bancorp’s stock price. To determineThe determination of the fair value of a reporting unit is a subjective process that involves the use of estimates and judgments, particularly related to cash flows, the appropriate discount rates and an applicable control premium. The Bancorp employs an income-based approach, utilizing the

25Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

reporting unit’s forecasted cash flows (including a terminal value approach to estimate cash flows beyond the final year of the forecast) and the reporting unit’s estimated cost of equity as the discount rate. Significant management judgment is necessary in the preparation of each reporting unit’s forecasted cash flows surrounding expectations for earnings projections, growth and credit loss expectations and actual results may differ from forecasted results. Additionally, the Bancorp determines its market capitalization based on the average of the closing price of the Bancorp’s stock during the month including the measurement date, incorporating an additional control premium, and compares this market-based fair value measurement to the aggregate fair value of the Bancorp’s reporting units in order to corroborate the results of the income approach.

When required to perform Step 2, the Bancorp compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss equal to that excess amount is recognized. A recognized impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying amount of that goodwill and cannot be reversed in future periods even if the fair value of the reporting unit subsequently recovers.

During Step 2, the Bancorp determines the implied fair value of goodwill for a reporting unit by assigning the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Significant management judgement is necessary in the identification and valuation of unrecognized intangible assets and the valuation of the reporting unit’s recorded assets and liabilities. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. This assignment process is only performed for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment. The Bancorp does not adjust the carrying values of recognized assets or liabilities (other than goodwill, if appropriate), nor does it recognize previously unrecognized intangible assets in the Consolidated Financial Statements as a result of this assignment process. Refer to Note 89 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the Bancorp’s goodwill.

Legal Contingencies

The Bancorp is partyand its subsidiaries are parties to numerous claims and lawsuits as well as threatened or potential actions or claims concerning matters arising from the conduct of its business activities. The outcome of claims or litigation and the timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict and significant judgment may be required in the determination of both the probability of loss and whether the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. The Bancorp’s estimates are subjective and are based on the status of legal and regulatory proceedings, the merit of the Bancorp’s defenses and consultation with internal and external legal counsel. A reserveAn accrual for a potential litigation loss is established when information related to the loss contingency indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. This reserve is included in Other Liabilities inRefer to Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Balance Sheets and is adjusted from time to time as appropriate to reflect changes in circumstances. Legal expenses are recorded in other noninterest expense inFinancial Statements for further information regarding the Consolidated Statements of Income.Bancorp’s legal proceedings.

 

 

2641  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RISK FACTORS

The risks listed below present risks that could have a material impact on the Bancorp’s financial condition, the results of its operations, or its business.

RISKS RELATING TO ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS

Weakness in the U.S. economy, including within Fifth Third’s geographic footprint, has adversely affected Fifth Third in the past and may adversely affect Fifth Third in the future.

If the strength of the U.S. economy in general or the strength of the local economies in which Fifth Third conducts operations declines this could result in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit, including a resultant effect on Fifth Third’s loan portfolio and ALLL and in the receipt of lower proceeds from the sale of loans and foreclosed properties. These factors could result in higher delinquencies, greater charge-offs and increased losses in future periods, which could materially adversely affect Fifth Third’s financial condition and results of operations.

The global financial markets continue to be strained as a result of economic slowdowns and concerns, especially about the creditworthiness of the European Union member states and financial institutions in the European Union. These factors could have international implications, which could hinder the U.S. economic recovery and affect the stability of global financial markets.

Certain European Union member states have fiscal obligations greater than their fiscal revenue, which has caused investor concern over such countries’ ability to continue to service their debt and foster economic growth in their economies. The European debt crisis and measures adopted to address it have significantly weakened European economies. A weaker European economy may cause investors to lose confidence in the safety and soundness of European financial institutions and the stability of European member economies. A failure to adequately address sovereign debt concerns in Europe could hamper economic recovery or contribute to recessionary economic conditions and severe stress in the financial markets, including in the United States. Should the U.S. economic recovery be adversely impacted by these factors, the likelihood for loan and asset growth at U.S. financial institutions, like Fifth Third, may deteriorate.

Changes in interest rates could affect Fifth Third’s income and cash flows.

Fifth Third’s income and cash flows depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and investment securities, and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond Fifth Third’s control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies (in particular, the FRB). Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence the origination of loans, the prepayment speed of loans, the purchase of investments, the generation of deposits and the rates received on loans and investment securities and paid on deposits or other sources of funding. The impact of these changes may be magnified if Fifth Third does not effectively manage the relative sensitivity of its assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. Fluctuations in these areas may adversely affect Fifth Third and its shareholders.

Changes and trends in the capital markets may affect Fifth Third’s income and cash flows.

Fifth Third enters into and maintains trading and investment positions in the capital markets on its own behalf and manages investment positions on behalf of its customers. These investment positions include derivative financial instruments. The revenues and profits Fifth Third derives from managing proprietary and customer trading and investment positions are dependent on market prices. Market changes and trends may result in a decline in investment advisory revenue or investment or trading losses that may impact Fifth Third. Losses on behalf of its customers could expose Fifth Third to litigation, credit risks or loss of revenue from those customers. Additionally, losses in Fifth Third’s trading and investment positions could lead to a loss with respect to those investments and may adversely affect cash flows and funding costs.

Problems encountered by financial institutions larger than or similar to Fifth Third could adversely affect financial markets generally and have indirect adverse effects on Fifth Third.

The commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely interrelated as a result of credit, trading, clearing or other relationships between the institutions. As a result, concerns about, or a default or threatened default by, one institution could lead to significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems, losses or defaults by other institutions. This is sometimes referred to as “systemic risk” and may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, clearing houses, banks, securities firms and exchanges, with which the Bancorp interacts on a daily basis, and therefore could adversely affect Fifth Third.

Fifth Third’s stock price is volatile.

Fifth Third’s stock price has been volatile in the past and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include:

Actual or anticipated variations in earnings;

Changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections;

Fifth Third’s announcements of developments related to its businesses;

Operating and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers;

Actions by government regulators;

New technology used or services offered by traditional and non-traditional competitors;

News reports of trends, concerns and other issues related to the financial services industry;

Natural disasters;

Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism or military conflicts.

The price for shares of Fifth Third’s common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to Fifth Third’s performance. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price for shares of Fifth Third’s common stock, and the current market price of such shares may not be indicative of future market prices.

27Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Changes in retail distribution strategies and consumer behavior may adversely impact Fifth Third’s investments in its bank premises and equipment and other assets and may lead to increased expenditures to change its retail distribution channel

Fifth Third has significant investments in bank premises and equipment for its branch network including its 1,302 full service banking centers, 93 parcels of land held for the development of future banking centers, as well as its retail work force and other branch banking assets. Advances in technology such as e-commerce, telephone, internet and mobile banking, and in-branch self-service technologies including automatic teller machines and other equipment, as well as changing customer preferences for these other methods of accessing Fifth Third’s products and services, could decrease the value of Fifth Third’s branch network or other retail distribution assets and may cause it to change its retail distribution strategy, close and/or sell certain branches or parcels of land held for development and restructure or reduce its remaining branches and work force. These actions could lead to losses on these assets or could adversely impact the carrying value of other long-lived assets and may lead to increased expenditures to renovate and reconfigure remaining branches or to otherwise reform its retail distribution channel.

RISKS RELATING TO FIFTH THIRD’S GENERAL BUSINESS

Deteriorating credit quality, particularly in real estate loans, has adversely impacted Fifth Third in the past and may adversely impact Fifth Third in the future.

When Fifth Third lends money or commits to lend money the Bancorp incurs credit risk or the risk of loss if borrowers do not repay their loans. The credit performance of the loan portfolios significantly affects the Bancorp’s financial results and condition. If the current economic environment were to deteriorate, more customers may have difficulty in repaying their loans or other obligations which could result in a higher level of credit losses and reserves for credit losses. Fifth Third reserves for credit losses by establishing reserves through a charge to earnings. The amount of these reserves is based on Fifth Third’s assessment of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio (including unfunded credit commitments). The process for determining the amount of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments is critical to Fifth Third’s financial results and condition. It requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments about the environment, including analysis of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of borrowers to repay their loans.

Fifth Third might underestimate the credit losses inherent in its loan portfolio and have credit losses in excess of the amount reserved. Fifth Third might increase the reserve because of changing economic conditions, including falling home prices or higher unemployment, or other factors such as changes in borrower’s behavior. As an example, borrowers may “strategically default,” or discontinue making payments on their real estate-secured loans if the value of the real estate is less than what they owe, even if they are still financially able to make the payments.

Fifth Third believes that both the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments are adequate to cover inherent losses at December 31, 2014; however, there is no assurance that they will be sufficient to cover future credit losses, especially if housing and employment conditions worsen. In the event of significant deterioration in economic conditions, Fifth Third may be required to increase reserves in future periods, which would reduce earnings.

For more information, refer to the “Risk Management - Credit Risk Management,” “Critical Accounting Policies - Allowance for

Loan and Leases,” and “Reserve for Unfunded Commitments” sections of MD&A.

Fifth Third must maintain adequate sources of funding and liquidity.

Fifth Third must maintain adequate funding sources in the normal course of business to support its operations and fund outstanding liabilities, as well as meet regulatory expectations. Fifth Third primarily relies on bank deposits to be a low cost and stable source of funding for the loans Fifth Third makes and the operations of Fifth Third’s business. Core customer deposits, which include transaction deposits and other time deposits, have historically provided Fifth Third with a sizeable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds (average core deposits funded 71% of average total assets at December 31, 2014). In addition to customer deposits, sources of liquidity include investments in the securities portfolio, Fifth Third’s sale or securitization of loans in secondary markets and the pledging of loans and investment securities to access secured borrowing facilities through the FHLB and the FRB, and Fifth Third’s ability to raise funds in domestic and international money and capital markets.

Fifth Third’s liquidity and ability to fund and run the business could be materially adversely affected by a variety of conditions and factors, including financial and credit market disruptions and volatility or a lack of market or customer confidence in financial markets in general similar to what occurred during the financial crisis in 2008 and early 2009, which may result in a loss of customer deposits or outflows of cash or collateral and/or ability to access capital markets on favorable terms.

Other conditions and factors that could materially adversely affect Fifth Third’s liquidity and funding include a lack of market or customer confidence in Fifth Third or negative news about Fifth Third or the financial services industry generally which also may result in a loss of deposits and/or negatively affect the ability to access the capital markets; the loss of customer deposits to alternative investments; inability to sell or securitize loans or other assets, increased regulatory requirements, and reductions in one or more of Fifth Third’s credit ratings. A reduced credit rating could adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to borrow funds and raise the cost of borrowings substantially and could cause creditors and business counterparties to raise collateral requirements or take other actions that could adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to raise capital. Many of the above conditions and factors may be caused by events over which Fifth Third has little or no control such as what occurred during the financial crisis. While market conditions have stabilized and, in many cases, improved, there can be no assurance that significant disruption and volatility in the financial markets will not occur in the future.

Recent regulatory changes relating to liquidity and risk management may also negatively impact Fifth Third’s results of operations and competitive position. Various regulations recently adopted or proposed, and additional regulations under consideration, impose or could impose more stringent liquidity requirements for large financial institutions, including Fifth Third. These regulations address, among other matters, liquidity stress testing, minimum liquidity requirements and restrictions on short-term debt issued by top-tier holding companies. Given the overlap and complex interactions of these regulations with other regulatory changes, including the resolution and recovery framework applicable to Fifth Third, the full impact of the adopted and proposed regulations will remain uncertain until their full implementation.

If Fifth Third is unable to continue to fund assets through customer bank deposits or access capital markets on favorable terms or if Fifth Third suffers an increase in borrowing costs or otherwise

28  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

fails to manage liquidity effectively; liquidity, operating margins, financial results and condition may be materially adversely affected. As Fifth Third did during the financial crisis, it may also need to raise additional capital through the issuance of stock, which could dilute the ownership of existing stockholders, or reduce or even eliminate common stock dividends to preserve capital.

Fifth Third may have more credit risk and higher credit losses to the extent loans are concentrated by location or industry of the borrowers or collateral.

Fifth Third’s credit risk and credit losses can increase if its loans are concentrated to borrowers engaged in the same or similar activities or to borrowers who as a group may be uniquely or disproportionately affected by economic or market conditions. Deterioration in economic conditions, housing conditions and real estate values in these states and generally across the country could result in materially higher credit losses.

Fifth Third may be required to repurchase residential mortgage loans or reimburse investors and others as a result of breaches in contractual representations and warranties.

Fifth Third sells residential mortgage loans to various parties, including GSEs and other financial institutions that purchase residential mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. Fifth Third may be required to repurchase residential mortgage loans, indemnify the securitization trust, investor or insurer, or reimburse the securitization trust, investor or insurer for credit losses incurred on loans in the event of a breach of contractual representations or warranties that is not remedied within a period (usually 60 days or less) after Fifth Third receives notice of the breach. Contracts for residential mortgage loan sales to the GSEs include various types of specific remedies and penalties that could be applied to inadequate responses to repurchase requests. If economic conditions and the housing market deteriorate or future investor repurchase demand and success at appealing repurchase requests differ from past experience, Fifth Third could have increased repurchase obligations and increased loss severity on repurchases, requiring material additions to the repurchase reserve.

If Fifth Third does not adjust to rapid changes in the financial services industry, its financial performance may suffer.

Fifth Third’s ability to deliver strong financial performance and returns on investment to shareholders will depend in part on its ability to expand the scope of available financial services to meet the needs and demands of its customers. In addition to the challenge of competing against other banks in attracting and retaining customers for traditional banking services, Fifth Third’s competitors also include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, specialty finance and insurance companies who seek to offer one-stop financial services that may include services that banks have not been able or allowed to offer to their customers in the past or may not be currently able or allowed to offer. This increasingly competitive environment is primarily a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems, as well as the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers.

If Fifth Third is unable to grow its deposits, it may be subject to paying higher funding costs.

The total amount that Fifth Third pays for funding costs is dependent, in part, on Fifth Third’s ability to grow its deposits. If Fifth Third is unable to sufficiently grow its deposits to meet liquidity objectives, it may be subject to paying higher funding costs. Fifth Third competes with banks and other financial services

companies for deposits. If competitors raise the rates they pay on deposits, Fifth Third’s funding costs may increase, either because Fifth Third raises rates to avoid losing deposits or because Fifth Third loses deposits and must rely on more expensive sources of funding. Higher funding costs reduce our net interest margin and net interest income. Fifth Third’s bank customers could take their money out of the bank and put it in alternative investments, causing Fifth Third to lose a lower cost source of funding. Checking and savings account balances and other forms of customer deposits may decrease when customers perceive alternative investments, such as the stock market, as providing a better risk/return tradeoff.

The Bancorp’s ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries accounts for most of its revenue and could affect its liquidity and ability to pay dividends.

Fifth Third Bancorp is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. Fifth Third Bancorp typically receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on Fifth Third Bancorp’s stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations, as well as regulatory expectations, limit the amount of dividends that the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary and certain nonbank subsidiaries may pay. Regulatory scrutiny of capital levels at bank holding companies and insured depository institution subsidiaries has increased since the financial crisis and has resulted in increased regulatory focus on all aspects of capital planning, including dividends and other distributions to shareholders of banks such as the parent bank holding companies. Also, Fifth Third Bancorp’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of that subsidiary’s creditors. Limitations on the Bancorp’s ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity and ability to pay dividends on stock or interest and principal on its debt.

The financial services industry is highly competitive and creates competitive pressures that could adversely affect Fifth Third’s revenue and profitability.

The financial services industry in which Fifth Third operates is highly competitive. Fifth Third competes not only with commercial banks, but also with insurance companies, mutual funds, hedge funds, and other companies offering financial services in the U.S., globally and over the internet. Fifth Third competes on the basis of several factors, including capital, access to capital, revenue generation, products, services, transaction execution, innovation, reputation and price. Over time, certain sectors of the financial services industry have become more concentrated, as institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms. These developments could result in Fifth Third’s competitors gaining greater capital and other resources, such as a broader range of products and services and geographic diversity. Fifth Third may experience pricing pressures as a result of these factors and as some of its competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.

Fifth Third and/or the holders of its securities could be adversely affected by unfavorable ratings from rating agencies.

Fifth Third’s ability to access the capital markets is important to its overall funding profile. This access is affected by the ratings assigned by rating agencies to Fifth Third, certain of its subsidiaries and particular classes of securities they issue. The interest rates that Fifth Third pays on its securities are also influenced by, among other things, the credit ratings that it, its subsidiaries and/or its

29  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

securities receive from recognized rating agencies. A downgrade to Fifth Third or its subsidiaries’ credit rating could affect its ability to access the capital markets, increase its borrowing costs and negatively impact its profitability. A ratings downgrade to Fifth Third, its subsidiaries or their securities could also create obligations or liabilities to Fifth Third under the terms of its outstanding securities that could increase Fifth Third’s costs or otherwise have a negative effect on its results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, a downgrade of the credit rating of any particular security issued by Fifth Third or its subsidiaries could negatively affect the ability of the holders of that security to sell the securities and the prices at which any such securities may be sold.

Fifth Third could suffer if it fails to attract and retain skilled personnel.

Fifth Third’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key individuals. Competition for qualified candidates in the activities and markets that Fifth Third serves is great and Fifth Third may not be able to hire these candidates and retain them. If Fifth Third is not able to hire or retain these key individuals, Fifth Third may be unable to execute its business strategies and may suffer adverse consequences to its business, operations and financial condition.

In June 2010, the federal banking agencies issued joint guidance on executive compensation designed to help ensure that a banking organization’s incentive compensation policies do not encourage imprudent risk taking and are consistent with the safety and soundness of the organization. In addition, the DFA requires those agencies, along with the SEC, to adopt rules to require reporting of incentive compensation and to prohibit certain compensation arrangements. The federal banking agencies and the SEC proposed such rules in April 2011. In addition, in June 2012, the SEC issued final rules to implement DFA’s requirement that the SEC direct the national securities exchanges to adopt certain listing standards related to the compensation committee of a company’s board of directors as well as its compensation advisers. If Fifth Third is unable to attract and retain qualified employees, or do so at rates necessary to maintain its competitive position, or if compensation costs required to attract and retain employees become more expensive, Fifth Third’s performance, including its competitive position, could be materially adversely affected.

Fifth Third’s mortgage banking revenue can be volatile from quarter to quarter.

Fifth Third earns revenue from the fees it receives for originating mortgage loans and for servicing mortgage loans. When rates rise, the demand for mortgage loans tends to fall, reducing the revenue Fifth Third receives from loan originations. At the same time, revenue from MSRs can increase through increases in fair value. When rates fall, mortgage originations tend to increase and the value of MSRs tends to decline, also with some offsetting revenue effect. Even though the origination of mortgage loans can act as a “natural hedge,” the hedge is not perfect, either in amount or timing. For example, the negative effect on revenue from a decrease in the fair value of residential MSRs is immediate, but any offsetting revenue benefit from more originations and the MSRs relating to the new loans would accrue over time. It is also possible that even if interest rates were to fall, mortgage originations may also fall or any increase in mortgage originations may not be enough to offset the decrease in the MSRs value caused by the lower rates.

Fifth Third typically uses derivatives and other instruments to hedge its mortgage banking interest rate risk. Fifth Third generally does not hedge all of its risks, and the fact that Fifth Third attempts to hedge any of the risks does not mean Fifth Third will be successful. Hedging is a complex process, requiring sophisticated

models and constant monitoring. Fifth Third may use hedging instruments tied to U.S. Treasury rates, LIBOR or Eurodollars that may not perfectly correlate with the value or income being hedged. Fifth Third could incur significant losses from its hedging activities. There may be periods where Fifth Third elects not to use derivatives and other instruments to hedge mortgage banking interest rate risk.

Fifth Third uses financial models for business planning purposes that may not adequately predict future results.

Fifth Third uses financial models to aid in its planning for various purposes including its capital and liquidity needs, potential charge- offs, reserves, and other purposes. The models used may not accurately account for all variables that could affect future results, may fail to predict outcomes accurately and/or may overstate or understate certain effects. As a result of these potential failures, Fifth Third may not adequately prepare for future events and may suffer losses or other setbacks due to these failures.

Changes in interest rates could also reduce the value of MSRs.

Fifth Third acquires MSRs when it keeps the servicing rights after the sale or securitization of the loans that have been originated or when it purchases the servicing rights to mortgage loans originated by other lenders. Fifth Third initially measures all residential MSRs at fair value and subsequently amortizes the MSRs in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. Fair value is the present value of estimated future net servicing income, calculated based on a number of variables, including assumptions about the likelihood of prepayment by borrowers. Servicing rights are assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance and permanent impairment recognized through a write-off of the servicing asset and related valuation allowance.

Changes in interest rates can affect prepayment assumptions and thus fair value. When interest rates fall, borrowers are usually more likely to prepay their mortgage loans by refinancing them at a lower rate. As the likelihood of prepayment increases, the fair value of MSRs can decrease. Each quarter Fifth Third evaluates the fair value of MSRs, and decreases in fair value below amortized cost reduce earnings in the period in which the decrease occurs.

The preparation of Fifth Third’s financial statements requires the use of estimates that may vary from actual results.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. If new information arises that results in a material change to a reserve amount, such a change could result in a change to previously announced financial results. Refer to the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of MD&A for more information regarding management’s significant estimates.

Changes in accounting standards or interpretations could impact Fifth Third’s reported earnings and financial condition.

The accounting standard setters, including the FASB, the SEC and other regulatory agencies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of Fifth Third’s consolidated financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how Fifth Third records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, Fifth Third could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, which would result in the recasting of Fifth Third’s prior period financial statements.

30Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Future acquisitions may dilute current shareholders’ ownership of Fifth Third and may cause Fifth Third to become more susceptible to adverse economic events.

Subject to requisite regulatory approvals, future business acquisitions could be material to Fifth Third and it may issue additional shares of stock to pay for those acquisitions, which would dilute current shareholders’ ownership interests. Acquisitions also could require Fifth Third to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur debt. In those events, Fifth Third could become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.

Difficulties in combining the operations of acquired entities with Fifth Third’s own operations may prevent Fifth Third from achieving the expected benefits from its acquisitions.

Upon receipt of requisite governmental approvals and consummation of such transactions, inherent uncertainties exist when integrating the operations of an acquired entity. Fifth Third may not be able to fully achieve its strategic objectives and planned operating efficiencies in an acquisition. In addition, the markets and industries in which Fifth Third and its potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive. Fifth Third may lose customers or the customers of acquired entities as a result of an acquisition. Future acquisition and integration activities may require Fifth Third to devote substantial time and resources and as a result Fifth Third may not be able to pursue other business opportunities.

After completing an acquisition, Fifth Third may find certain items are not accounted for properly in accordance with financial accounting and reporting standards. Fifth Third may also not realize the expected benefits of the acquisition due to lower financial results pertaining to the acquired entity. For example, Fifth Third could experience higher charge-offs than originally anticipated related to the acquired loan portfolio.

Fifth Third may sell or consider selling one or more of its businesses. Should it determine to sell such a business, it may not be able to generate gains on sale or related increase in shareholders’ equity commensurate with desirable levels. Moreover, if Fifth Third sold such businesses, the loss of income could have an adverse effect on its earnings and future growth.

Fifth Third owns, or owns a minority stake in, as applicable, several non-strategic businesses that are not significantly synergistic with its core financial services businesses. Fifth Third has, from time to time, considered the sale of such businesses and/or interests, including, for example, portions of our stake in Vantiv Holding, LLC. If it were to determine to sell such businesses and/or interests, Fifth Third would be subject to market forces that may make completion of a sale unsuccessful or may not be able to do so within a desirable time frame. If Fifth Third were to complete the sale of non-core businesses and/or interests, it would suffer the loss of income from the sold businesses and/or interests, including those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and such loss of income could have an adverse effect on its future earnings and growth.

Fifth Third relies on its systems and certain service providers, and certain failures could materially adversely affect operations.

Fifth Third collects, processes and stores sensitive consumer data by utilizing computer systems and telecommunications networks operated by both Fifth Third and third party service providers. Fifth Third has security, backup and recovery systems in place, as well as a business continuity plan to ensure the systems will not be

inoperable. Fifth Third also has security to prevent unauthorized access to the systems. In addition, Fifth Third requires its third party service providers to maintain similar controls. However, Fifth Third cannot be certain that the measures will be successful. A security breach in the systems and loss of confidential information such as credit card numbers and related information could result in losing the customers’ confidence and thus the loss of their business as well as additional significant costs for privacy monitoring activities.

Fifth Third’s necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transaction volume poses the risk that technical system flaws or employee errors, tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses and may be difficult to detect. Fifth Third may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages). Fifth Third is further exposed to the risk that its third party service providers may be unable to fulfill their contractual obligations (or will be subject to the same risk of fraud or operational errors as Fifth Third). These disruptions may interfere with service to Fifth Third’s customers and result in a financial loss or liability.

Fifth Third is exposed to cyber-security risks, including denial of service, hacking, and identity theft.

Fifth Third relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in disruptions to its accounting, deposit, loan and other systems, and adversely affect our customer relationships. While Fifth Third has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of these possible events, there can be no assurance that any such failure, interruption or security breach will not occur or, if any does occur, that it can be sufficiently remediated. There have been increasing efforts on the part of third parties, including through cyber attacks, to breach data security at financial institutions or with respect to financial transactions. There have been several recent instances involving financial services and consumer-based companies reporting the unauthorized disclosure of client or customer information or the destruction or theft of corporate data, by both private individuals and foreign governments. In addition, because the techniques used to cause such security breaches change frequently, often are not recognized until launched against a target and may originate from less regulated and remote areas around the world, Fifth Third may be unable to proactively address these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Furthermore, there has been a well-publicized series of apparently related distributed denial of service attacks on large financial services companies, including Fifth Third Bank. Distributed denial of service attacks are designed to saturate the targeted online network with excessive amounts of network traffic, resulting in slow response times, or in some cases, causing the site to be temporarily unavailable. To date these attacks have not been intended to steal financial data, but meant to interrupt or suspend a company’s Internet service. These events did not result in a breach of Fifth Third’s client data and account information remained secure; however, the attacks did adversely affect the performance of Fifth Third’s website and in some instances prevented customers from accessing Fifth Third’s website. While the event was resolved in a timely fashion and primarily resulted in inconvenience to our customers, future cyber-attacks could be more disruptive and damaging. Cyber threats are rapidly evolving and Fifth Third may not be able to anticipate or prevent all such attacks. Fifth Third may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize these risks or in the investigation of such cyber-attacks or related to the protection of the Bancorp’s customers from identity theft as a result

31Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

of such attacks. Nevertheless, the occurrence of any failure, interruption or security breach of our systems, or of our third-party service providers, particularly if widespread or resulting in financial losses to customers, could also seriously damage Fifth Third’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject it to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose it to civil litigation and financial liability.

Fifth Third is exposed to operational and reputational risk.

Fifth Third is exposed to many types of operational risk, including but not limited to, business continuity risk, information management risk, fraud risk, model risk, third party service provider risk, human resources risk, and process risk.

Negative public opinion can result from Fifth Third’s actual or alleged conduct in activities, such as lending practices, data security, corporate governance and acquisitions, and may damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Additionally, actions taken by government regulators and community organizations may also damage Fifth Third’s reputation. This negative public opinion can adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to attract and keep customers and can expose it to litigation and regulatory action.

The results of Vantiv Holding, LLC could have a negative impact on Fifth Third’s operating results and financial condition.

In 2009, Fifth Third sold an approximate 51% interest in its processing business, Vantiv Holding, LLC (formerly Fifth Third Processing Solutions). As a result of additional share sales completed by Fifth Third in 2012, 2013 and 2014 the Bancorp’s current ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC is approximately 23%. The Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is not consolidated based on Fifth Third’s remaining ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC. Vantiv Holding, LLC’s operating results could be poor or favorable and could affect the operating results of Fifth Third. In addition, Fifth Third participates in a multi-lender credit facility to Vantiv Holding, LLC and repayment of these loans is contingent on future cash flows from Vantiv Holding, LLC.

Weather related events or other natural disasters may have an effect on the performance of Fifth Third’s loan portfolios, especially in its coastal markets, thereby adversely impacting its results of operations.

Fifth Third’s footprint stretches from the upper Midwestern to lower Southeastern regions of the United States. This area has experienced weather events including hurricanes and other natural disasters. The nature and level of these events and the impact of global climate change upon their frequency and severity cannot be predicted. If large scale events occur, they may significantly impact its loan portfolios by damaging properties pledged as collateral as well as impairing its borrowers’ ability to repay their loans.

RISKS RELATED TO THE LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

As a regulated entity, the Bancorp is subject to certain capital requirements that may limit its operations and potential growth.

The Bancorp is a bank holding company and a financial holding company. As such, it is subject to the comprehensive, consolidated supervision and regulation of the FRB, including risk-based and leverage capital requirements, investment practices, dividend policy and growth. The Bancorp must maintain certain risk-based and leverage capital ratios as required by the FRB which can change depending upon general economic conditions and the Bancorp’s

particular condition, risk profile and growth plans. Compliance with the capital requirements, including leverage ratios, may limit operations that require the intensive use of capital and could adversely affect the Bancorp’s ability to expand or maintain present business levels.

In June 2012, Federal banking agencies proposed enhancements to the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banking organizations, which implemented aspects of Basel III, such as re-defining the regulatory capital elements and minimum capital ratios, introducing regulatory capital buffers above those minimums, revising the agencies’ rules for calculating risk-weighted assets and introducing a new Tier I common equity ratio. In July 2013, the Federal banking agencies issued final rules for the enhanced regulatory capital requirements, which included modifications to the proposed rules. The final rules provide the option for certain banking organizations, including the Bancorp, to opt out of including AOCI in Tier I capital and retain the treatment of residential mortgage exposures consistent with the current Basel I capital rules. The new capital rules are effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain components and other provisions. The need to maintain more and higher quality capital as well as greater liquidity going forward could limit our business activities, including lending, and our ability to expand, either organically or through acquisitions. Moreover, although these new requirements are being phased in over time, U.S. Federal banking agencies have been taking into account expectations regarding the ability of banks to meet these new requirements, including under stressed conditions, in approving actions that represent uses of capital, such as dividend increases and share repurchases.

The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary must remain well-capitalized, well-managed and maintain at least a “Satisfactory” CRA rating for the Bancorp to retain its status as a financial holding company. Failure to meet these requirements could result in the FRB placing limitations or conditions on the Bancorp’s activities (and the commencement of new activities) and could ultimately result in the loss of financial holding company status. In addition, failure by the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary to meet applicable capital guidelines could subject the bank to a variety of enforcement remedies available to the federal regulatory authorities. These include limitations on the ability to pay dividends, the issuance by the regulatory authority of a capital directive to increase capital, and the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC.

Fifth Third’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by new or changed regulations and by the manner in which such regulations are applied by regulatory authorities.

Previous economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies placing increased focus on and scrutiny of the financial services industry. The U.S. government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by introducing various actions and passing legislation such as the DFA. Such programs and legislation subject Fifth Third and other financial institutions to restrictions, oversight and/or costs that may have an impact on Fifth Third’s business, financial condition, results of operations or the price of its common stock.

New proposals for legislation and regulations continue to be introduced that could further substantially increase regulation of the financial services industry. Fifth Third cannot predict whether any pending or future legislation will be adopted or the substance and impact of any such new legislation on Fifth Third. Additional regulation could affect Fifth Third in a substantial way and could

32Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fifth Third is subject to various regulatory requirements that may limit its operations and potential growth.

Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions and their holding companies, the FRB, the FDIC, the CFPB and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions have the authority to compel or restrict certain actions by Fifth Third and its banking subsidiary. Fifth Third and its banking subsidiary are subject to such supervisory authority and, more generally, must, in certain instances, obtain prior regulatory approval before engaging in certain activities or corporate decisions. There can be no assurance that such approvals, if required, would be forthcoming or that such approvals would be granted in a timely manner. Failure to receive any such approval, if required, could limit or impair Fifth Third’s operations, restrict its growth and/or affect its dividend policy. Such actions and activities subject to prior approval include, but are not limited to, increasing dividends paid by Fifth Third or its banking subsidiary, entering into a merger or acquisition transaction, acquiring or establishing new branches, and entering into certain new businesses.

In addition, Fifth Third, as well as other financial institutions more generally, have recently been subjected to increased scrutiny from government authorities, including bank regulatory authorities, stemming from broader systemic regulatory concerns, including with respect to stress testing, capital levels, asset quality, provisioning, AML/BSA, consumer compliance and other prudential matters and efforts to ensure that financial institutions take steps to improve their risk management and prevent future crises. In this regard, government authorities, including the bank regulatory agencies, are also pursuing aggressive enforcement actions with respect to compliance and other legal matters involving financial activities, which heightens the risks associated with actual and perceived compliance failures and may also adversely affect our ability to enter into certain transactions or engage in certain activities, or obtain necessary regulatory approvals in connection therewith.

In some cases, regulatory agencies may take supervisory actions that may not be publicly disclosed, which restrict or limit a financial institution. Finally, as part of Fifth Third’s regular examination process, Fifth Third’s and its banking subsidiary’s respective regulators may advise it and its banking subsidiary to operate under various restrictions as a prudential matter. Such supervisory actions or restrictions, if and in whatever manner imposed, could have a material adverse effect on Fifth Third’s business and results of operations and may not be publicly disclosed.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, investigations and proceedings by various governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, as well as self-regulatory agencies which may lead to adverse consequences.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, as well as self-regulatory agencies, regarding their respective businesses. Such matters may result in material adverse consequences, including without limitation, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other actions, amendments and/or restatements of Fifth Third’s SEC filings

and/or financial statements, as applicable, and/or determinations of material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures.

Deposit insurance premiums levied against Fifth Third Bank may increase if the number of bank failures increase or the cost of resolving failed banks increases.

The FDIC maintains a DIF to protect insured depositors in the event of bank failures. The DIF is funded by fees assessed on insured depository institutions including Fifth Third Bank. Future deposit premiums paid by Fifth Third Bank depend on the level of the DIF and the magnitude and cost of future bank failures. Fifth Third Bank may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums if market developments change such that the DIF balance is reduced.

Legislative or regulatory compliance, changes or actions or significant litigation, could adversely impact Fifth Third or the businesses in which Fifth Third is engaged.

Fifth Third is subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost all aspects of its operations and limit the businesses in which Fifth Third may engage. These laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers and depositors. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact Fifth Third or its ability to increase the value of its business. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against Fifth Third could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defending itself and may lead to penalties that materially affect Fifth Third and its shareholders. Future changes in the laws, including tax laws, or regulations or their interpretations or enforcement may also be materially adverse to Fifth Third and its shareholders or may require Fifth Third to expend significant time and resources to comply with such requirements.

On July 21, 2010 the President of the United States signed into law the DFA. Many parts of the DFA are now in effect, while others are in an implementation stage likely to continue for several years. A number of reform provisions are likely to significantly impact the ways in which banks and bank holding companies, including Fifth Third and its bank subsidiary, conduct their business:

The CFPB has been given authority to regulate consumer financial products and services sold by banks and non-bank companies and to supervise banks with assets of more than $10 billion and their affiliates for compliance with Federal consumer protection laws. Any new regulatory requirements promulgated by the CFPB could require changes to our consumer businesses, result in increased compliance costs and affect the streams of revenue of such businesses. The FSOC has been charged with identifying systemic risks, promoting stronger financial regulation and identifying those non-bank companies that are systemically important and thus should be subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve.

The DFA “Volcker Rule” provisions and implementing final rule generally prohibit any banking entity from (i) engaging in short-term proprietary trading for its own account and (ii) sponsoring or acquiring ownership interests in private equity or hedge funds. The Volcker Rule, however, contains a number of exceptions to these

33  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

prohibitions. For example, transactions on behalf of customers or in connection with certain underwriting and market making activities, as well as risk-mitigating hedging activities and certain foreign banking activities are permitted. The risk-mitigating hedging exemption applies to hedging activities that are designed to reduce or significantly mitigate specific, identifiable risks of individual or aggregated positions. Fifth Third is required to conduct an analysis supporting its hedging strategy and the effectiveness of hedges must be monitored and recalibrated as necessary. Fifth Third will be required to document, contemporaneously with the transaction, the hedging rationale for certain transactions that present heighted compliance risks. Under the market-making exemption, a trading desk is required to routinely stand ready to purchase and sell one or more types of financial instruments. The trading desk’s inventory in these types of financial instruments has to be designed not to exceed, on an ongoing basis, the reasonably expected near-term demands of customers.

The Volcker Rule and the rulemakings promulgated thereunder restrict banks and their affiliated entities from investing in or sponsoring certain private equity and hedge funds. Fifth Third does not sponsor any private equity or hedge funds that it is prohibited from sponsoring. As of December 31, 2014, the Bancorp had approximately $165 million in interests and approximately $60 million in binding commitments to invest in private equity funds likely to be affected by the Volcker rule. It is expected that the Bancorp may need to eliminate these investments although it is likely that these investments will be reduced over time in the ordinary course before compliance is required. In December 2014, the FRB extended the conformance period through July 2016 for investments in and relationships with such covered funds that were in place prior to December 31, 2013, and indicated that it intends to further extend the compliance period for such investments through July 2017. An ultimate forced sale of some of these investments could result in Fifth Third receiving less value than it would otherwise have received.

The FDIC and the Federal Reserve adopted a final rule that requires bank holding companies that have $50 billion or more in assets, like Fifth Third, to periodically submit to the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the FSOC a plan discussing how the company could be resolved in a rapid and orderly fashion if the company were to fail or experience material financial distress. In a related rulemaking, the FDIC adopted a final rule that requires insured depository institutions with $50 billion or more in assets, like Fifth Third, to annually prepare and submit a resolution plan to the FDIC, which would include, among other things, an analysis of how the institution could be resolved under the FDIA in a manner that protects depositors and limits losses or costs to creditors of the bank. Initial plans for Fifth Third and its bank subsidiary have been submitted, in accordance with the final

regulatory rules, for review by the FDIC, the Federal Reserve, and the FSOC. The Federal Reserve and the FDIC may jointly impose restrictions on Fifth Third or its bank subsidiary, including additional capital requirements or limitations on growth, if the agencies determine that the institution’s plan is not credible or would not facilitate a rapid and orderly resolution of Fifth Third under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, or Fifth Third Bank under the FDIA, and additionally could require Fifth Third to divest assets or take other actions if it did not submit an acceptable resolution within two years after any such restrictions were imposed.

Title VII of DFA imposes a new regulatory regime on the U.S. derivatives markets. While most of the provisions related to derivatives markets are now in effect, several additional requirements await final regulations from the relevant regulatory agencies for derivatives, the CFTC and the SEC. One aspect of this new regulatory regime for derivatives is that substantial oversight responsibility has been provided to the CFTC, which, as a result, now has a meaningful supervisory role with respect to some of Fifth Third’s businesses. In 2014, Fifth Third Bank registered as a swap dealer with the CFTC and became subject to new substantive requirements, including real time trade reporting and robust record keeping requirements, business conduct requirements (including daily valuations, disclosure of material risks associated with swaps and disclosure of material incentives and conflicts of interest), and mandatory clearing and exchange trading of all standardized swaps designated by the relevant regulatory agencies as required to be cleared. Although the ultimate impact will depend on the promulgation of all final regulations, Fifth Third’s derivatives business will likely be further subject to new substantive requirements, including margin requirements in excess of current market practice and capital requirements specific to this business. These requirements will collectively impose implementation and ongoing compliance burdens on Fifth Third and will introduce additional legal risk (including as a result of newly applicable antifraud and anti-manipulation provisions and private rights of action). Once finalized, the rules may raise the costs and liquidity burden associated with Fifth Third’s derivatives businesses and adversely affect or cause Fifth Third to change its derivatives products.

Financial institutions may be required, regardless of risk, to pay taxes or other fees to the U.S. Treasury. Such taxes or other fees could be designed to reimburse the U.S. Treasury for the many government programs and initiatives it has taken or may undertake as part of its economic stimulus efforts. The Department of Treasury issued an interim final rule in 2012 to establish an assessment schedule for the collection of fees from bank holding companies with at least $50 billion in assets and foreign banks with at least $50 billion in assets in the U.S. to cover the expenses of the Office of Financial Research and FSOC. In August 2013, the FRB also adopted a final

34  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

rule to implement an assessment provision under the DFA equal to the expense the FRB estimates are necessary or appropriate to supervise and regulate bank holding companies with $50 billion or more in assets.

On July 31, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs in a case challenging certain provisions of the FRB’s rule concerning electronic debit card transaction fees and network exclusivity arrangements (the “Current Rule”) that were adopted to implement Section 1075 of the DFA, known as the Durbin Amendment. The Court held that, in adopting the Current Rule, the FRB violated the Durbin Amendment’s provisions concerning which costs are allowed to be taken into account for purposes of setting fees that are reasonable and proportional to the costs incurred by the issuer and therefore the Current Rule’s maximum permissible fees were too high. In addition, the Court held that the Current Rule’s network non-exclusivity provisions concerning unaffiliated payment networks for debit cards also violated the Durbin Amendment. The Court vacated the Current Rule, but stayed its ruling to provide the FRB an opportunity to replace the invalidated portions. The FRB appealed this decision and on March 21, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. The merchants have filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, on January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the Circuit Court reversal, thereby largely upholding the Current Rule and substantially reducing uncertainty surrounding debit card interchange fees the Bancorp is permitted to charge. Refer to the Noninterest Income subsection of the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A for further information regarding the Bancorp’s debit card interchange revenue.

It is clear that the reforms, both under the DFA and otherwise, are having a significant effect on the entire financial industry. Fifth Third believes compliance with the DFA and implementing its regulations and other initiatives will likely continue to negatively impact revenue and increase the cost of doing business, both in terms of transition expenses and on an ongoing basis, and may also limit Fifth Third’s ability to pursue certain desirable business opportunities. Any new regulatory requirements or changes to existing requirements could require changes to Fifth Third’s businesses, result in increased compliance costs and affect the profitability of such businesses. Additionally, reform could affect the behaviors of third parties that we deal with in the course of our business, such as rating agencies, insurance companies and investors. The extent to which Fifth Third can adjust its strategies to offset such adverse impacts also is not known at this time.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become the subject of litigation which could result in legal liability and damage to Fifth Third’s reputation.

Fifth Third and certain of its directors and officers have been named from time to time as defendants in various class actions and

other litigation relating to Fifth Third’s business and activities. Past, present and future litigation have included or could include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. The SEC has announced a policy of seeking admissions of liability in certain settled cases, which could adversely impact the defense of private litigation. These matters could result in material adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief, amendments and/or restatements of Fifth Third’s SEC filings and/or financial statements, as applicable and/or determinations of material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures. Like other large financial institutions and companies, Fifth Third is also subject to risk from potential employee misconduct, including non-compliance with policies and improper use or disclosure of confidential information. Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against Fifth Third could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations and/or cause significant reputational harm to its business.

Fifth Third’s ability to pay or increase dividends on its common stock or to repurchase its capital stock is restricted.

Fifth Third’s ability to pay dividends or repurchase stock is subject to regulatory requirements and the need to meet regulatory expectations. Fifth Third is subject to an annual assessment by the FRB as part of CCAR. The mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon, a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon, a discussion of any expected changes to the Bancorp’s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity, a detailed description of the Bancorp’s process for assessing capital adequacy and the Bancorp’s capital policy. The capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the FRB adopted in connection with the implementation of the Basel III accord, including the framework’s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements. Fifth Third’s stress testing results and 2015 capital plan were submitted to the FRB on January 5, 2015.

The FRB’s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan, the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan. Additionally, the FRB will review the robustness of the capital adequacy process, the capital policy and the Bancorp’s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios and above a Tier I common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine-quarter planning horizon.

35Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

STATEMENTS OF INCOME ANALYSIS

 

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the interest earned on securities, loans and leases (including yield-related fees), securities and other interest-earning assetsshort-term investments less the interest paid for core deposits (includes transaction deposits and other time deposits) and wholesale funding (includes certificates of deposit $100,000 and over, other deposits, federal funds purchased, other short-term borrowings and long-term debt). The net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets. Net interest rate spread is the difference between the average yield earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin is typically greater than net interest rate spread due to the interest income earned on those assets that are funded by noninterest-bearing liabilities, or free funding, such as demand deposits or shareholders’ equity.

Table 8 presentsTables 10 and 11 present the components of net interest income, net interest margin and net interest rate spread for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, 2013as well as the relative impact of changes in the balance sheet and 2012.changes in interest rates on net interest income. Nonaccrual loans and leases and loans held for sale have been included in the average loan and lease balances. Average outstanding securities balances are based on amortized cost with any unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities included in other assets. Table 9 provides the relative impact of changes in the balance sheet and changes in interest rates on net interest income.

Net interest income on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) was $3.6 billion for both the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015. Net interest income was positively impacted by increases in average taxable securities of $3.1 billion and average loans and leases of $981 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, net interest income was positively impacted by the decision of the Federal Open Market Committee to raise the target range of the federal funds rate 25 bps to 50 bps in December 2015 and 25 bps to 75 bps in December 2016. These positive impacts were partially offset by an increase in average long-term debt of $750 million coupled with a decrease in the net interest rate spread to 2.66% during the year ended December 31, 2016 from 2.69% during the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in the net interest rate spread was driven by a 9 bps increase on rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities partially offset by a 6 bps increase in yields on average interest-earning assets.

Net interest margin on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) was 2.88% for both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Net interest margin was positively impacted by an increase in average taxable securitiesfree funding balances partially offset by the aforementioned decrease in net interest rate spread coupled with an increase of $5.4$2.7 billion in average interest-earning assets. The increase in average free funding balances was driven by increases in average demand deposits and average shareholders’ equity of $698 million and $727 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 20142016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.

Interest income on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) from loans and leases increased $86 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 due to an increase in average loans and leases coupled with an increase in yields on these securities of 16 bps foraverage loans and leases. Average loans and leases increased $981 million during the year ended December 31, 20142016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. Net interest income also included the benefit of an increase in average loans2015 and leases of $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014, as well as a decrease in the rates paid on long-term debt for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. These benefits were partially offset by lower yields on loans and leases and an increase in average long-term debt of $5.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the net interest rate spread decreased to 2.94% from 3.15% in 2013was primarily driven by a 21 bps decrease in yields on average interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Net interest margin was 3.10% for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to 3.32% for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease from December 31, 2013 was driven primarily by the previously mentioned decrease in the net interest rate spread, partially offset by increases in average free funding balances.

Interest income fromresidential mortgage loans, and leases decreased $148 million, or four percent, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to a decrease of 25 bps in yields on average commercial construction loans and leases partially offset by an increase of two percent in average loans and leases for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in average loans and leases for the year ended December 31, 2014 was driven primarily by an increase of nine percent in average commercial and industrial loans partially offset by a decreasedecreases in average residential mortgageautomobile loans of eight percentand average home equity. Yields on average loans and leases increased 5 bps during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2015 primarily as a result of increases in yields on average commercial construction loans, average commercial and industrial loans and average home equity loans partially offset by a decrease in yields on average credit cards which included the impact of a $16 million reduction in interest income related to refunds to be offered to certain bankcard customers. For more information on the Bancorp’s loan and lease portfolio, refer to the Loans and Leases subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A. Interest income from investment securities and other short-term investments increased $206$83 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 driven2015. The increase was primarily the result of the previously mentioned increase in average taxable securities, partially offset by a decrease of $14 million in dividends on FRB stock, due to the factors discussed above.amended provisions of the Federal Reserve Act governing dividend payments to FRB stockholders.

AverageInterest expense on core deposits increased $6.8 billion, or eight percent,$15 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 20132015. This increase was primarily due to an

increaseincreases in average money market deposits, average interest checking deposits and average demand deposits, partially offset by a decrease in average savings deposits. Thethe cost of average interest bearinginterest-bearing core deposits was 27to 26 bps for both the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Interest expense on money market deposits increased during the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 driven by a $5.2 billion increase in average money market deposits and a 10 bps increase in the rate paid on average money market deposits. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of 27 bps in the rate paid on other time deposits for the year ended December 31, 20142016 compared to 24 bps for the year ended December 31, 2013.2015. The increase in the cost of average interest-bearing core deposits was primarily due to an increase in the cost of average interest checking and money market deposits. Refer to the Deposits subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A for additional information on the Bancorp’s deposits.

Interest expense on average wholesale funding increased $68 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $23 million, or nine percent,2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015 primarily due to an increase of 26 bps in interest expense related tothe rates paid on average long-term debt partially offset by a decrease in average certificates $100,000 and over. Interest expense on long-term debt increased duringcoupled with the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 driven by a $5.0 billionaforementioned increase in average long-term debt partially offset by a 67 bps decrease in the rate paid on long-term debt primarily due to the redemption of $750 million of outstanding TruPS during the fourth quarter of 2013 and the lower cost of new debt issuances in 2014. Interest expense on average certificates $100,000 and over decreased during the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 driven primarily by a $2.4 billion decrease in average certificates $100,000 and over partially offset by a 7 bps increase in the rate paid on average certificates $100,000 and over.debt. Refer to the Borrowings subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A for additional information on the Bancorp’s borrowings. During bothAverage wholesale funding represented 26% and 24% of average interest-bearing liabilities during the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013, wholesale funding represented 24% of average interest-bearing liabilities.2015, respectively. For more information on the Bancorp’s interest rate risk management, including estimated earnings sensitivity to changes in market interest rates, refer tosee the Market Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A.

 

36Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

TABLE 8: CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME 
For the years ended December 31201420132012
($ in millions)Average 
Balance 
 Revenue/
 Cost
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
  Revenue/
  Cost
 Average   
Yield/
Rate  
 Average
Balance
Revenue/
Cost
 Average   
Yield/
Rate  
 

Assets

Interest-earning assets:

Loans and leases:(a)

Commercial and industrial loans

$41,178 $1,346  3.27 % $37,770 $1,361  3.60 $32,911 $1,349  4.10 % 

Commercial mortgage

 7,745  260  3.36  8,481  306  3.60   9,686  369  3.81 

Commercial construction

 1,492  51  3.44  793  27  3.45   835  25  2.99 

Commercial leases

 3,585  108  3.01  3,565  116  3.26   3,502  127  3.62 

Subtotal – commercial

 54,000  1,765  3.27  50,609  1,810  3.58   46,934  1,870  3.98 

Residential mortgage loans

 13,344  518  3.88  14,428  564  3.91   13,370  543  4.06 

Home equity

 9,059  336  3.71  9,554  355  3.71   10,369  393  3.79 

Automobile loans

 12,068  334  2.77  12,021  373  3.10   11,849  439  3.70 

Credit card

 2,271  227  9.98  2,121  209  9.87   1,960  192  9.79 

Other consumer loans and leases

 385  138  35.99  360  155  42.93   340  155  45.32 

Subtotal – consumer

 37,127  1,553  4.18  38,484  1,656  4.30   37,888  1,722  4.54 

Total loans and leases

 91,127  3,318  3.64  89,093  3,466  3.89   84,822  3,592  4.23 

Securities:

Taxable

 21,770  722  3.32  16,395  518  3.16   15,262  527  3.45 

Exempt from income taxes(a)

 53  3  4.94  49  3  5.29   57  2  3.29 

Other short-term investments

 3,043  8  0.26  2,417  6  0.26   1,495  4  0.26 

Total interest-earning assets

 115,993  4,051  3.49  107,954  3,993  3.70   101,636  4,125  4.06 

Cash and due from banks

 2,892  2,482  2,355 

Other assets

 14,539  15,053  15,695 

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 (1,481       (1,757       (2,072      

Total assets

$131,943       $123,732       $117,614       

Liabilities and Equity

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Interest checking

$25,382 $56  0.22 % $23,582 $53  0.23 $23,096 $49  0.22 % 

Savings

 16,080  16  0.10  18,440  22  0.12   21,393  37  0.17 

Money market

 14,670  51  0.35  9,467  23  0.25   4,903  11  0.22 

Foreign office deposits

 1,828  5  0.29  1,501  4  0.28   1,528  4  0.27 

Other time deposits

 3,762  40  1.06  3,760  50  1.33   4,306  68  1.59 

Certificates - $100,000 and over

 3,929  34  0.85  6,339  50  0.78   3,102  46  1.48 

Other deposits

 -  -  0.02  17  -  0.11   27  -  0.13 

Federal funds purchased

 458  -  0.09  503  1  0.12   560  1  0.14 

Other short-term borrowings

 1,873  2  0.10  3,024  5  0.18   4,246  8  0.18 

Long-term debt

 12,928  247  1.91  7,914  204  2.58   9,043  288  3.17 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 80,910  451  0.56  74,547  412  0.55   72,204  512  0.71 

Demand deposits

 31,755  29,925  27,196 

Other liabilities

 3,950        4,917        4,462       

Total liabilities

 116,615  109,389  103,862 

Total equity

 15,328        14,343        13,752       

Total liabilities and equity

$    131,943       $    123,732       $    117,614       

Net interest income

$3,600 $3,581 $3,613 

Net interest margin

 3.10 %  3.32  3.55 % 

Net interest rate spread

 2.94  3.15   3.35 

Interest-bearing liabilities to interest-earning assets

   

    69.75        69.05         71.04 
(a)

The FTE adjustments included in the above table were$21, $20 and $18 for the years endedDecember 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The federal statutory rate utilized was 35% for all periods presented.

 

3742  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

TABLE 9: CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO VOLUME AND YIELD/RATE(a) 
TABLE 10: CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME ON AN FTE BASISTABLE 10: CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST INCOME ON AN FTE BASIS 

 
For the years ended December 312014 Compared to 2013  2013 Compared to 2012  2016 2015 2014 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
          Average       Average       Average      
  Average   Revenue/   Yield/ Average Revenue/   Yield/ Average Revenue/   Yield/      
($ in millions)Volume  Yield/Rate      Total      VolumeYield/Rate   Total         Balance   Cost   Rate Balance Cost   Rate Balance Cost   Rate      

Assets

 

Assets:

              

Interest-earning assets:

              

Loans and leases:

Loans and leases:(a)

              

Commercial and industrial loans

$116  (131 (15     $187  (175 12      $        43,184    1,413    3.27 $        42,594  1,334    3.13 $        41,178  1,346    3.27% 

Commercial mortgage

 (26 (20 (46 (44 (19 (63)    

Commercial construction

 24  -  24  (2 4  2    

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,899    229    3.32  7,121  227    3.19  7,745  260    3.36    

Commercial construction loans

   3,648    125    3.42  2,717  86    3.17  1,492  51    3.44    

Commercial leases

 1  (9 (8  2  (13 (11)       3,916    105    2.69  3,796  106    2.78  3,585  108    3.01    

Subtotal – commercial loans and leases

 115  (160 (45  143  (203 (60)    

 

Total commercial loans and leases

   57,647    1,872    3.25  56,228  1,753    3.12  54,000  1,765    3.27    

 

Residential mortgage loans

 (42 (4 (46 42  (21 21       15,101    535    3.54  13,798  509    3.69  13,344  518    3.88    

Home equity

 (18 (1 (19 (31 (7 (38)       7,998    302    3.78  8,592  312    3.63  9,059  336    3.71    

Automobile loans

 1  (40 (39 6  (72 (66)       10,708    290    2.71  11,847  315    2.66  12,068  334    2.77    

Credit card

 16  2  18  15  2  17       2,205    214    9.69  2,303  237    10.27  2,271  227    9.98    

Other consumer loans and leases

 9  (26 (17  8  (8 -       661    44    6.56  571  45    8.00  385  138    35.99    

Subtotal – consumer loans and leases

 (34 (69 (103  40  (106 (66)    

 

Total consumer loans and leases

   36,673    1,385    3.78  37,111  1,418    3.82  37,127  1,553    4.18    

 

Total loans and leases

 81  (229 (148 183  (309 (126)      $94,320    3,257    3.45 $93,339  3,171    3.40 $91,127  3,318    3.64% 

Securities:

 -               

Taxable

 177  27  204  38  (47 (9)       30,019    950    3.16  26,932  867    3.22  21,770  722    3.32    

Exempt from income taxes

 -  -  -  1  -  1    

Exempt from income taxes(a)

   80    3    4.51  55  3    5.23  53  3    4.94    

Other short-term investments

 2  -  2   2  -  2       1,866    8    0.44  3,258  8    0.25  3,043  8    0.26    

Subtotal – securities and other short-term investments

 179  27  206   41  (47 (6)    

Total change in interest income

$260  (202 58  $224  (356 (132)    

Liabilities

 

Total interest-earning assets

  $126,285    4,218    3.34 $123,584  4,049    3.28 $115,993  4,051    3.49% 

Cash and due from banks

   2,303      2,608     2,892    

Other assets

   14,963       15,179(c)      14,505 (c)    

Allowance for loan and lease losses

   (1,285)      (1,293)     (1,481)    

 

Total assets

  $142,266      $140,078(c)     $131,909 (c)    

 

Liabilities and Equity:

              

Interest-bearing liabilities:

              

Interest checking

$3  -  3 $-  4  4    

Savings

 (2 (4 (6 (4 (11 (15)    

Money market

 16  12  28  11  1  12    

Interest checking deposits

  $25,143    58    0.23 $26,160  50    0.19 $25,382  56    0.22% 

Savings deposits

   14,346    7    0.05  14,951  9    0.06  16,080  16    0.10    

Money market deposits

   19,523    53    0.27  18,152  44    0.24  14,670  51    0.35    

Foreign office deposits

 1  -  1  -  -  -       497    1    0.16  817  1    0.16  1,828  5    0.29    

Other time deposits

 -  (10 (10 (8 (10 (18)       4,010    49    1.24  4,051  49    1.20  3,762  40    1.06    

Certificates - $100,000 and over

 (20 4  (16 33  (29 4    

 

Total interest-bearing core deposits

   63,519    168    0.26  64,131  153    0.24  61,722  168    0.27    

Certificates $100,000 and over

   2,735    36    1.30  2,869  33    1.16  3,929  34    0.85    

Other deposits

   333    1    0.41  57   -    0.16  -   -    0.02    

Federal funds purchased

 (1 -  (1 -  -  -       506    2    0.39  920  1    0.13  458   -    0.09    

Other short-term borrowings

 (1 (2 (3 (3 -  (3)       2,845    10    0.36  1,721  2    0.12  1,873  2    0.10    

Long-term debt

 106  (63 43   (34 (50 (84)       15,394    361    2.35   14,644(c)  306    2.09   12,894 (c)  247    1.91    

Total change in interest expense

 102  (63 39   (5 (95 (100)    

Total change in net interest income

$            158  (139 19  $            229  (261 (32)    

 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

  $85,332    578    0.68 $84,342(c)  495    0.59 $80,876 (c)  451    0.56% 

Demand deposits

   35,862      35,164     31,755    

Other liabilities

   4,445      4,672     3,950    

 

Total liabilities

  $125,639      $124,178(c)     $116,581 (c)    

Total equity

  $16,627      $15,900     $15,328    

 

Total liabilities and equity

  $142,266      $140,078(c)     $131,909 (c)    

 

Net interest income (FTE)(b)

    $3,640     $3,554     $3,600   

Net interest margin (FTE)(b)

       2.88     2.88     3.10% 

Net interest rate spread (FTE)(b)

       2.66      2.69      2.94    

Interest-bearing liabilities to interest-earning assets

       67.57      68.25(c)      69.73(c)  

 
(a)

The FTE adjustments included in the above table were$25 for the year endedDecember 31, 2016 and $21 for both the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

(b)

Net interest income (FTE), net interest margin (FTE) and net interest rate spread (FTE) are non-GAAP measures. For further information, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

(c)

Upon adoption of ASU 2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 and 2014 Consolidated Balance Sheets were adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $33 and $34, respectively, of average debt issuance costs from average other assets to average long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

43  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

                                                                                                
TABLE 11: CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO VOLUME AND YIELD/RATE(a) 

 

 
For the years ended December 31  2016 Compared to 2015   2015 Compared to 2014         

 

   

 

 

 
($ in millions)  Volume     Yield/Rate   Total   Volume       Yield/Rate   Total         

 

 

Assets:

            

Interest-earning assets:

            

Loans and leases:

            

Commercial and industrial loans

  $19      60      79      45      (57)     (12)     

Commercial mortgage loans

   (7)     9      2      (21)     (12)     (33)     

Commercial construction loans

   32      7      39      39      (4)     35      

Commercial leases

   3      (4)     (1)     6      (8)     (2)     

 

 

Total commercial loans and leases

   47      72      119      69      (81)     (12)     

 

 

Residential mortgage loans

   47      (21)     26      17      (26)     (9)     

Home equity

   (22)     12      (10)     (17)     (7)     (24)     

Automobile loans

   (31)     6      (25)     (5)     (14)     (19)     

Credit card

   (10)     (13)     (23)     3      7      10      

Other consumer loans and leases

   8      (9)     (1)     47      (140)     (93)     

 

 

Total consumer loans and leases

   (8)     (25)     (33)     45      (180)     (135)     

 

 

Total loans and leases

  $39      47      86      114      (261)     (147)     

Securities:

            

Taxable

   98      (15)     83      167      (22)     145      

Other short-term investments

   (4)     4      -      -      -      -      

 

 

Total change in interest income

  $                133      36      169      281      (283)     (2)     

 

 

Liabilities:

            

Interest-bearing liabilities:

            

Interest checking deposits

  $(3)     11      8      2      (8)     (6)     

Savings deposits

   -      (2)     (2)     (1)     (6)     (7)     

Money market deposits

   4      5      9      10      (17)     (7)     

Foreign office deposits

   -      -      -      (2)     (2)     (4)     

Other time deposits

   (1)     1      -      3      6      9      

 

 

Total interest-bearing core deposits

   -      15      15      12      (27)     (15)     

Certificates $100,000 and over

   (1)     4      3      (11)     10      (1)     

Other deposits

   1      -      1      -      -      -      

Federal funds purchased

   -      1      1      1      -      1      

Other short-term borrowings

   2      6      8      -      -      -      

Long-term debt

   15      40      55      35      24      59      

 

 

Total change in interest expense

  $17      66      83      37      7      44      

 

 

Total change in net interest income

  $116      (30)     86      244      (290)     (46)     

 

 
(a)

Changes in interest not solely due to volume or yield/rate are allocated in proportion to the absolute dollar amount of change in volume and yield/rate.

 

Provision for Loan and Lease Losses

The Bancorp provides as an expense an amount for probable loan and lease losses within the loan and lease portfolio that is based on factors previously discussed in the Critical Accounting Policies section.section of MD&A. The provision is recorded to bring the ALLL to a level deemed appropriate by the Bancorp to cover losses inherent in the portfolio. Actual credit losses on loans and leases are charged against the ALLL. The amount of loans and leases actually removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheets isare referred to as charge-offs. Net charge-offs include current period charge-offs less recoveries on previously charged-off loans and leases.

The provision for loan and lease losses increased to $315was $343 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $229$396 million for the same period in 2013.the prior year. The increasedecrease in provision expense for 2014the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the

prior year was primarily due to an increase in net charge-offs related to certain impaired commercial and industrial loansthe decrease in the first and third quarterslevel of 2014 and an increase in net charge-offs related to the

transfer of certain residential mortgage loans from the portfolio to held for salecommercial criticized assets, which reflected improvement in the fourth quarternational economy and stabilization of 2014. The impact of these increasescommodity prices, and a decrease in charge-offs on provision expense in 2014 was partially offset by decreases in nonperforming loans and leases and improved delinquency metrics.outstanding loan balances. The ALLL declined $260$19 million from $1.6 billion at December 31, 20132015 to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2014. As of2016. At December 31, 2014,2016, the ALLL as a percent of portfolio loans and leases decreased to 1.47%1.36%, compared to 1.79%1.37% at December 31, 2013.2015.

Refer to the Credit Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A as well as Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more detailed information on the provision for loan and lease losses, including an analysis of loan portfolio composition, nonperforming assets, net charge-offs and other factors considered by the Bancorp in assessing the credit quality of the loan and lease portfolio and the ALLL.

 

 

3844  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income decreased $754$307 million or 23%, for the year ended December 31, 20142016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2015. The following table presents the components of noninterest income are as follows:income:

 

TABLE 10: NONINTEREST INCOME               
TABLE 12: COMPONENTS OF NONINTEREST INCOME                              

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014 2013      2012       2011       2010             2016      2015     2014     2013     2012     

 

Service charges on deposits

$560        549  522  520  574           $          558      563      560      549      522     

Corporate banking revenue

 430        400  413  350  364            432      384      430      400      413     

Investment advisory revenue

 407        393  374  375  361       

Wealth and asset management revenue

     404      418      407      393      374     

Card and processing revenue

     319      302      295      272      253     

Mortgage banking net revenue

 310        700  845  597  647            285      348      310      700      845     

Card and processing revenue

 295        272  253  308  316       

Other noninterest income

 450        879  574  250  406            688      979      450      879      574     

Securities gains, net

 21        21  15  46  47            10      9      21      21      15     

Securities gains, net, non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

 -        13  3  9  14       

Securities gains, net - non-qualifying hedges on mortgage service rights

     -      -      -      13      3     

 

Total noninterest income

$            2,473        3,227  2,999  2,455  2,729           $2,696      3,003      2,473      3,227      2,999     

 

 

Service charges on deposits

Service charges on deposits increased $11decreased $5 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2013. Commercialthe year ended December 31, 2015 due primarily to a $10 million decrease in consumer deposit revenue increased $15 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to new customer acquisition and product expansion. Consumer deposit revenue decreased $4 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due tofees driven by a decrease in consumer checking and savings fees from a decline in the percentage of consumer customers being charged service fees, partially offset by ana $5 million increase in overdraft fees.commercial deposit fees driven by new customer acquisition.

Corporate banking revenue

Corporate banking revenue increased $30$48 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2013.the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase from the prior year was primarily the result of an increasedriven by increases in syndication fees and lease remarketing fees. The increase was partially offset by decreases in letter of credit fees and foreign exchange fees. Syndication fees increased $22$32 million compared to 2013 due to the investment

in resourcesyear ended December 31, 2015 as a result of increased activity in the commercialmarket and gains in specialized business and a strengthening economy in 2014. The increase in leasesegments. Lease remarketing fees increased $30 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 from the prior year and included the impact of a $9$16 million write-downin gains on certain leveraged lease terminations. Additionally, the increase included the impact of equipment value on animpairment charges of $20 million related to certain operating lease equipment that were recognized during the fourth quarteryear ended December 31, 2016 compared to $36 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015. Letter of 2013.credit fees decreased $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the prior year primarily driven by a decrease in outstanding VRDNs. Foreign exchange fees decreased $8 million

during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the prior year primarily driven by lower volume coupled with lower currency volatility.

Investment advisoryWealth and asset management revenue

InvestmentWealth and asset management revenue (formerly investment advisory revenue increasedrevenue) decreased $14 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2013.the year ended December 31, 2015. The increasedecrease from the prior year was primarily due to a decrease of $16 million in securities and brokerage fees driven by lower transactional fees partially offset by an increase of $15in managed account fee-based business. The decrease was partially offset by a $2 million increase in private client service fees dueand institutional fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to growth in personal asset management fees, partially offset by a decrease in securities broker fees due to a decline in transactional brokerage revenue.the year ended December 31, 2015. The BancorpBancorp’s Trust, Brokerage and Insurance businesses had approximately $308$315 billion and $302$297 billion in total assets under care as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, and managed $27$31 billion and $29 billion in assets for individuals, corporations and not-for-profit organizations as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015, respectively.

Card and processing revenue

Card and processing revenue increased $17 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by an increase in the number of actively used cards and customer spend volume.

 

Mortgage banking net revenue

Mortgage banking net revenue decreased $390$63 million or 56%, in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2013. the year ended December 31, 2015.

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking net revenue are as follows:revenue:

 

TABLE 11: COMPONENTS OF MORTGAGE BANKING NET REVENUE 
TABLE 13: COMPONENTS OF MORTGAGE BANKING NET REVENUE                  

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)    2014 2013            2012           2016      2015      2014      

 

Origination fees and gains on loan sales

$153        453  821          $          186       171       153      

Net mortgage servicing revenue:

            

Gross mortgage servicing fees

 246        251  250           199       222       246      

Mortgage servicing rights amortization

 (119)        (166 (186)      

Net valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights and free-standing derivatives entered into to economically hedge MSR

 30        162  (40)      

MSR amortization

     (131)      (139)      (119)     

Net valuation adjustments on MSRs and free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge MSRs

     31       94       30      

 

Net mortgage servicing revenue

 157        247  24           99       177       157      

 

Mortgage banking net revenue

$            310        700  845          $285       348       310      

 

 

Origination fees and gains on loan sales decreased $300increased $15 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2013 primarily as the result of a 66% decreaseyear ended December 31, 2015 driven by an increase in saleable residential mortgage loan originations. Residential mortgage loan originations decreasedincreased to $7.5$10.0 billion in 2014 from $22.3 billion in 2013 due to strong refinancing activity that occurred duringfor the year ended December 31, 2013.2016 from $8.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Net mortgage servicing revenue is comprised of gross mortgage servicing fees and related servicing rightsMSR amortization as well as valuation adjustments on MSRs and mark-to-market adjustments on both settled and outstanding free-standing derivative financial instruments used to economically hedge the MSR portfolio.

45  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net mortgage servicing revenue decreased $90$78 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2013the year ended December 31, 2015 driven primarily by a decrease of $132$63 million in net valuation adjustments, as well as a decrease in gross mortgage servicing fees of $23 million. The decrease was partially

offset by a decrease in mortgage servicing rightsMSR amortization of $47 million.$8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the prior year.

The following table presents the components of net valuation adjustment gain of $30 million during 2014 included $95 million in gains from derivatives economically hedging

the MSRs partially offset by temporary impairment of $65 millionadjustments on the MSRs. The net valuation adjustment gainMSR portfolio and the impact of $162 millionthe non-qualifying hedging strategy for the years ended December 31:

TABLE 14: COMPONENTS OF NET VALUATION ADJUSTMENTS ON MSRs            

 

 
($ in millions)  2016     2015     2014        

 

 

Changes in fair value and settlement of free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge the MSR portfolio

  $                24    90    95      

Recovery of (provision for) MSR impairment

   7    4    (65)     

 

 

Net valuation adjustments on MSRs and free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge MSRs

  $31    94    30      

 

 

Mortgage rates increased during 2013 includedthe year ended December 31, 2016 which caused modeled prepayment speeds to decrease, leading to a recovery of temporary impairment of $192 million on MSRs partially offset by $30 million in losses from derivatives economically hedging the MSRs. Mortgage rates decreased during 2014 which caused the modeled prepayments speeds to increase, which led to temporary impairment on servicing rights during the year. Mortgage rates increased in 2013during the year ended December 31, 2015 which caused the modeled prepayment speeds to slow, anddecrease, which led to thea recovery of temporary impairment on the servicing rights in 2013.during the year.

Servicing rights are deemed impaired when a borrower’s loan rate is distinctly higher than prevailing rates. Impairment on servicing rights is reversed when the prevailing rates return to a level commensurate with the borrower’s loan rate. Further detail on the valuation of MSRs can be found in Note 1112 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Bancorp maintains a non-qualifying hedging strategy to manage a portion of the risk

39Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

associated with changes in the valuation on the MSR portfolio.

Refer to Note 1213 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the free-standing derivatives used to economically hedge the MSR portfolio.

The Bancorp’s total residential loans serviced as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $79.0 billion and $82.7 billion, respectively, with $65.4 billion and $69.2 billion, respectively, of residential mortgage loans serviced for others.

In addition to the derivative positions used to economically hedge the MSR portfolio, the Bancorp acquiresmay acquire various securities as a component of its non-qualifying hedging strategy. The Bancorp did not hold or sell securities related to the non-qualifying hedging strategy during the year ended December 31, 2014. Net gains on the sale of

these securities were $13 million during the year ended 2013, recorded in securities gains, net, non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Card and processing revenue

Card and processing revenue increased $23 million in 2014 compared to 2013. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in the number of actively used cards as well as higher processing fees related to additional ATM locations. Debit card interchange revenue, included in card and processing revenue, was $128 million and $122 million for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013, respectively.2015.

The Bancorp’s total residential loans serviced at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $69.3 billion and $73.4 billion, respectively, with $53.6 billion and $59.0 billion, respectively, of residential mortgage loans serviced for others.

 

 

Other noninterest income

The majorfollowing table presents the components of other noninterest income are as follows:income:

 

TABLE 12: COMPONENTS OF OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME 
TABLE 15: COMPONENTS OF OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME            

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)     2014  2013    2012        2016        2015        2014          

Gain on Vantiv, Inc. IPO and sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares

$148           336           272      

 

Income from the TRA associated with Vantiv, Inc.

  $           313     80     23      

Operating lease income

 84  75  60         102     89     84      

Equity method income from interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC

 48  77  61         66     63     48      

Valuation adjustments on the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

   64     236     31      

BOLI income

   53     48     44      

Cardholder fees

 45  47  46         46     43     45      

BOLI income

 44  52  35      

Valuation adjustments on the warrant and put options associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

 31  206  67      

Consumer loan and lease fees

   23     23     25      

Banking center income

 30  34  32         20     21     30      

Consumer loan and lease fees

 25  27  27      

Gain on sale of certain retail branch operations

   19         -      

Private equity investment income

   11     28     27      

Insurance income

 13  25  28         11     14     13      

Gain on loan sales

 -  3  20      

Loss on OREO

 (14 (26 (57)      

Net gains on loan sales

   10     38     -      

Gain on sale and exercise of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC.

       89     -      

Gain on sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares

       331     125      

Loss on swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares

 (38 (31 (45)         (56)    (37)    (38)     

Net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment

   (13)    (101)    (19)     

Other, net

 34   54   28         10     14  ��  12      

 

Total other noninterest income

$        450   879   574        $688     979     450      

 

 

Other noninterest income decreased $429$291 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2013.the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease included the impact of a gain of $125$331 million on the sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares in the secondfourth quarter of 2014 compared to gains totaling $327 million during2015, decreases in positive valuation adjustments on the second and third quarters of 2013. The Bancorp recognized gains of $23 million and $9 millionwarrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC, a tax receivable agreementdecrease in the gain on the sale and exercise of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC, decreases in net gains on loan sales and private equity investment income, as well as an increase in the loss on the swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares. These decreases were partially offset by increases in the income from the

TRA associated with Vantiv, Inc. and a decrease in the fourth quarternet losses on disposition and impairment of 2014bank premises and 2013, respectively. In addition, theequipment as well as gains on sales of certain retail branch operations and an increase in operating lease income.

        The Bancorp recognized positive valuation adjustments on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC were $31of $64 million and $206$236 million for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The fair value of the stock warrant iswas calculated using the Black-Scholes valuationoption-pricing model, which utilizes several key inputs (Vantiv, Inc. stock price, strike price of the warrant and several unobservable inputs).

46  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The positive valuation adjustments for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were primarily due to increases of four percent24% and 60%40%, respectively, in Vantiv, Inc.’s share price from December 31, 20132015 to December 31, 2014November 22, 2016 and from December 31, 20122014 to December 31, 2013,2015, respectively. Equity method earnings fromIn addition to valuation adjustments, during the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv

Holding, LLC decreased $29 million from 2013 primarily due to charges taken by Vantiv Holding, LLC related to an acquisition in 2014 and a decrease in the Bancorp’s ownership percentagefourth quarter of Vantiv Holding, LLC from approximately 25% at December 31, 2013 to approximately 23% at December 31, 2014.

Insurance income decreased $12 million in 2014 compared to 2013 due to a decrease in premiums and fees collected in 2014. Additionally,2015, the Bancorp recognized $38a gain of $89 million on both the sale and $31exercise of a portion of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Bancorp recognized a gain of $9 million on the exercise of the remaining warrant in Vantiv Holding, LLC. For additional information on the valuation of the warrant, refer to Note 27 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net gains on loan sales decreased $28 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year as the prior period included the impact of a $37 million gain on the sale of residential mortgage loans classified as TDRs during the first quarter of 2015 which was partially offset by the $11 million gain on the sale of the agent bankcard loan portfolio during the second quarter of 2016.

Private equity investment income decreased $17 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to same period in the prior year primarily driven by the recognition of $9 million of OTTI on certain private equity investments in the third quarter of 2016. Refer to Note 27 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bancorp recognized $56 million of negative valuation adjustments related to the Visa total return swap compared to $37 million during same period in the prior year. The adjustments for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20142016 were primarily attributable to the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to vacate and 2013, respectively.reverse the district court’s approval of the settlement of an interchange antitrust class action litigation matter on June 30, 2016. For additional information on the valuation of the swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B sharesShares and the valuation of the warrant and put options associated with the sale of Vantiv Holding, LLC,

related litigation matters, refer to Note 17, Note 18 and Note 27 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income from the TRAs associated with Vantiv, Inc. increased $233 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in the prior year. This increase was primarily driven by a $280 million gain recognized in the third quarter of 2016 from the termination and settlement of gross cash flows from existing Vantiv, Inc. TRAs and the expected obligation to terminate and settle the remaining Vantiv, Inc. TRA cash flows upon the exercise of put or call options. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Bancorp recognized a $49 million gain from the payment from Vantiv, Inc. to terminate a portion of the TRA. Additionally, the Bancorp recognized a gain of $33 million associated with the annual TRA payment during the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to a $31 million gain during the same period in the prior year.

Net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment decreased $88 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with the same period in the prior year. This decrease was driven by impairment charges of $32 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to impairment charges of $109 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015. The “other” caption decreased $20 millionimpairment charges for the year ended 2014 compared to 2013. The decrease was primarilyDecember 31, 2016 were partially offset by a gain of $11 million on the resultsale-leaseback of $20 million in impairment charges in 2014 for branches and land.an office complex during the third quarter of 2016. For morefurther information, on these impairment charges, refer to Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Gains on sales of certain retail branch operations of $19 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 included an $11 million gain on the sale of the Bancorp’s retail operations in the Pittsburgh MSA to First National Bank of Pennsylvania during the second quarter of 2016 and an $8 million gain on the sale of the Bancorp’s retail operations in the St. Louis MSA to Great Southern Bank during the first quarter of 2016.

Operating lease income increased $13 million primarily as a result of an increase in syndication and participation origination activity.

 

 

40Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense increased $128 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to increases in personnel costs (salaries, wages and incentives plus employee benefits), technology and communications and other noninterest expense partially offset by decreases in net occupancy expense and card and processing expense. The following table presents the components of noninterest expense:

TABLE 16: COMPONENTS OF NONINTEREST EXPENSE                            

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)    2016       2015         2014         2013         2012         

 

 

Salaries, wages and incentives

    $        1,612    1,525      1,449      1,581      1,607     

Employee benefits

     339    323      334      357      371     

Net occupancy expense

     299    321      313      307      302     

Technology and communications

     234    224      212      204      196     

Card and processing expense

     132    153      141      134      121     

Equipment expense

     118    124      121      114      110     

Other noninterest expense

     1,169    1,105      1,139      1,264      1,374     

 

 

Total noninterest expense

    $3,903    3,775      3,709      3,961      4,081     

 

 

Efficiency ratio on an FTE basis(a)

     61.6    57.6      61.1      58.2      61.7     

 

 
(a)

This is a non-GAAP measure. For further information, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

Personnel costs increased $103 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 driven by an increase in base compensation, primarily due to personnel additions in risk and compliance and information technology, and increased variable compensation, as well as higher retirement and severance costs related to the Bancorp’s voluntary early retirement program. Full-time equivalent employees totaled 17,844 at December 31, 2016 compared to 18,261 at December 31, 2015.

        Technology and communications expense increased $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 driven primarily by increased investment in information technology associated with regulatory and compliance initiatives, system maintenance and other growth initiatives.

Net occupancy expense decreased $22 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a decrease in rent expense driven by a reduction in the number of full-service banking centers and ATM locations.

47  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Noninterest Expense

NoninterestCard and processing expense decreased $252$21 million or six percent, for the year ended December 31, 20142016 compared to the year ended December 31,

2015 primarily due to the impact of renegotiated service contracts.

The following table presents the components of other noninterest expense:

TABLE 17: COMPONENTS OF OTHER NONINTEREST EXPENSE                  

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)    2016         2015         2014          

 

 

Impairment on affordable housing investments

    $             168      145      135      

FDIC insurance and other taxes

     126      99      89      

Loan and lease

     110      118      119      

Marketing

     104      110      98      

Operating lease

     86      74      67      

Losses and adjustments

     73      55      188      

Professional service fees

     61      70      72      

Data processing

     51      45      41      

Postal and courier

     46      45      47      

Travel

     45      54      52      

Recruitment and education

     37      33      28      

Provision for (benefit from) the reserve for unfunded commitments

     23      4      (27)     

Donations

     23      29      18      

Insurance

     15      17      16      

Supplies

     14      16      15      

Other, net

     187      191      181      

 

 

Total other noninterest expense

    $1,169      1,105      1,139      

 

 

Other noninterest expense increased $64 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015 primarily due to decreasesincreases in total personnel costs (salaries, wages and incentives plus employee benefits) and other noninterest expense. The components of noninterest expense are as follows:

TABLE 13: NONINTEREST EXPENSE          
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014 2013 2012 2011 2010         

Salaries, wages and incentives

$1,449  1,581   1,607  1,478   1,430          

Employee benefits

 334  357   371  330   314          

Net occupancy expense

 313  307   302  305   298          

Technology and communications

 212  204   196  188   189          

Card and processing expense

 141  134   121  120   108          

Equipment expense

 121  114   110  113   122          

Other noninterest expense

 1,139  1,264   1,374  1,224   1,394          

Total noninterest expense

$        3,709            3,961             4,081            3,758             3,855          

Efficiency ratio

 61.1 %  58.2   61.7  62.3   60.7          

Total personnel costs decreased $155 million, or eight percent, in 2014 compared to 2013 driven by a decrease in incentive compensation primarily in the mortgage business due to lower production levels and a decrease in base compensation and

employee benefits as a result of a decline in the number of full time equivalent employees in 2014. Full time equivalent employees totaled 18,351 at December 31, 2014 compared to 19,446 at December 31, 2013.

The major components of other noninterest expense are as follows:

TABLE 14: COMPONENTS OF OTHER NONINTEREST EXPENSE      
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014 2013 2012         

Losses and adjustments

$188  221  187         

Impairment on affordable housing investments

 135  108  90         

Loan and lease

 119  158  183         

Marketing

 98  114  128         

FDIC insurance and other taxes

 89  127  114         

Professional service fees

 72  76  56         

Operating lease

 67  57  43         

Travel

 52  54  52         

Postal and courier

 47  48  48         

Data processing

 41  42  40         

Recruitment and education

 28  26  28         

OREO expense

 17  16  21         

Insurance

 16  17  18         

Supplies

 15  16  17         

Intangible asset amortization

 4  8  13         

Loss on debt extinguishment

 -  8  169         

Benefit from the reserve for unfunded commitments

 (27 (17 (2)         

Other, net

 178  185  169         

Total other noninterest expense

$          1,139              1,264              1,374         

Total other noninterest expense decreased $125 million, or 10%, in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to decreases in loan and lease expense, FDIC insurance and other taxes, losses and adjustments, marketing expense, debt extinguishment costs and an increase inimpairment on affordable housing investments, the benefit fromprovision for the reserve for unfunded commitments, losses and adjustments and operating lease expense partially offset by increasesdecreases in impairmenttravel expense, professional service fees and loan and lease expense.

FDIC insurance and other taxes increased $27 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to the implementation of the FDIC surcharge in the third quarter of 2016 as well as an increase in the FDIC insurance assessment base and a favorable settlement of a tax liability related to prior years during the first quarter of 2015. Impairment on affordable housing investments.investments increased $23 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to incremental losses resulting from previous growth in the portfolio. For further information, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments increased $19 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to an increase in estimated loss rates related to unfunded

commitments. Losses and adjustments increased $18 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to the impact of favorable legal settlements for the year ended December 31, 2015 partially offset by a decrease in legal settlements and reserve expense for the year ended December 31, 2016. Operating lease expense increased $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to an increase in the volume of leases. Travel expense and professional service fees both decreased $9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to overall expense control. Loan and lease expense decreased $39$8 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2013the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to lower loan closing and appraisal costs driven by a decline in mortgageautomobile loan originations. FDIC insurance and other taxes decreased $38 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to the change in the mix of the Bancorp’s funding base and higher capital levels, a change in tax laws during 2014 and the implementation of the large bank assessment fee, which included billings for prior periods during 2013. Losses and adjustments decreased $33 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to a decrease in legal settlements and reserve expense. Marketing expense decreased $16 million in 2014 compared to 2013 due to management’s expense control efforts. Debt extinguishment

costs decreased $8 million in 2014 compared to 2013. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bancorp incurred $8 million of debt extinguishment costs associated with the redemption of outstanding TruPS issued by Fifth Third Capital Trust IV. The benefit from the reserve for unfunded commitments was $27 million and $17 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the benefit recognized reflects a decrease in estimated loss rates related to unfunded commitments due to improved credit trends partially offset by an increase in unfunded commitments for which the Bancorp holds reserves.

Impairment on affordable housing investments increased $27 million in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily driven by a $12 million benefit from the sale of affordable housing investments in 2013 and incremental losses on previous investments.

The Bancorp continues to focus on efficiency initiatives as part of its core emphasis on operating leverage and expense control. The efficiency ratio (noninterest expense divided byon an FTE basis was 61.6% for the sumyear ended December 31, 2016 compared to 57.6% for the year ended December 31, 2015. The efficiency ratio on an FTE basis is a non-GAAP measure. For further information, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of netMD&A.

 

41  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

interest income (FTE) and noninterest income) was 61.1% for 2014

compared to 58.2% in 2013.

Applicable Income Taxes

Applicable income tax expense for all periods includes the benefit from tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments, certain gains on sales of leveraged leases that are exempt from federal taxation and tax credits, partially offset by the effect of certain nondeductible expenses. The tax credits are associated with the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program established under Section 42 of the IRC, the New Markets Tax Credit program established under Section 45D of the IRC, the Rehabilitation Investment Tax Credit program established under Section 47 of the IRC and the Qualified Zone Academy Bond program established under Section 1397E of the IRC.

The effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were primarily impacted by $164$182 million and $155$178 million, respectively, in tax credits $27and $56 million and $39 million of tax benefitbenefits from tax exempt income in 20142016 and 2013, respectively, and a $9 million non-cash charge to income2015, respectively.

The decrease in the effective tax expense related to stock-based awards duringrate from the year ended December 31, 2013. The Bancorp did not recognize a similar non-cash charge related2015 to stock-based awards during the year ended December 31, 2014.2016 was primarily related to a decrease in income before taxes, the increase in tax exempt income, and a change in the estimated deductibility of a prior expense.

As required under        During 2016, the Bancorp adopted ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”, effective as of January 1, 2016. Consistent with existing U.S. GAAP and ASU 2016-09, the Bancorp establishedestablishes a deferred tax asset and recognizes a corresponding deferred tax benefit for stock-based awards granted to its employees and directors. Whendirectors based on enacted tax rates and the expense recorded for financial reporting purposes. The actual tax deduction for these stock-based awards is determined when the stock-based awards are settled or expired and the tax deductions will typically be greater than or less than the expense previously recognized for financial reporting.

48  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Among other requirements, ASU 2016-09 requires that the tax consequences for the difference between the expense recognized for financial reporting or whenand the awards expire unexercised and whereBancorp’s actual tax deduction for the Bancorp has not accumulated an excess tax benefit for previously exercised or released stock-based awards the Bancorp is required to recognize a non-cash charge tobe recognized through income tax expense uponin the write-offinterim periods in which they occur. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, the deferred tax asset previously establishedconsequences for thesethe difference between the expense recognized for financial reporting and the actual tax deduction for stock-based awards. As a result of the expiration of certain stock options and SARs, the lapse of restrictions on certain shares of restricted stock and becauseawards was recognized either through additional paid-in-capital when the Bancorp did not have an accumulated excess“excess tax benefit, the Bancorp was required to recognize a non-cash charge tobenefits” from stock based

awards or through income tax expense of $9 million forwhen the write-offBancorp depleted its accumulated “excess tax benefits” from stock-based awards.

The Bancorp cannot predict its stock price or whether and when its employees will exercise stock-based awards in the future. As of the deferred tax asset previously established for these awards during the year ended December 31, 2013. Based on the accumulated excess tax benefit at December 31, 2014 the Bancorp was not required to recognize a non-cash charge to income tax expense related to stock-based awards for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Based on the Bancorp’s stock price at December 31, 2014 and the Bancorp��s accumulation of an excess tax benefit through the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, the Bancorp does not believe it will be requirednecessary to recognize a non-cash chargematerial impact to income tax expense over the next twelve months related to the settlement of stock-based awards. However, the Bancorp cannot predict its stock price or whether its employees will exercise other stock-based awards with lower exercise prices in the future. Therefore, it is possible the Bancorp may need to recognize a non-cash charge toamount of income tax expense inor benefit recognized upon settlement may vary significantly from expectations based on the future.Bancorp’s stock price and the number of SARs exercised by employees.

 

 

The Bancorp’s income before income taxes, applicable income tax expense and effective tax rate are as follows:

 

TABLE 15: APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES          
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014   2013   2012   2011   2010           

Income before income taxes

$        2,028            2,598            2,210            1,831              940         

Applicable income tax expense

 545  772  636  533  187         

Effective tax rate

 26.9 %  29.7  28.8  29.1  19.8         

TABLE 18: APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES                            

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)    2016   2015     2014     2013     2012     

 

 

Income before income taxes

    $        2,065    2,365      2,028      2,598      2,210     

Applicable income tax expense

     505    659      545      772      636     

Effective tax rate

     24.4   27.8      26.9      29.7      28.8     

 

 

 

4249  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

BUSINESS SEGMENT REVIEW

 

The Bancorp reports on four business segments: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending and Wealth and Asset Management (formerly Investment Advisors.Advisors). Additional detailed financial information on each business segment is included in Note 30 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Results of the Bancorp’s business segments are presented based on its management structure and management accounting practices. The structure and accounting practices are specific to the Bancorp; therefore, the financial results of the Bancorp’s business segments are not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions. The Bancorp refines its methodologies from time to time as management’s accounting practices or businesses change. In the second quarter of 2016, the Investment Advisors segment name was changed to Wealth and Asset Management to better reflect the services provided by the business segment.

The Bancorp manages interest rate risk centrally at the corporate level and employs alevel. By employing an FTP methodology, at the business segment level. This methodology insulates the business segments are insulated from most benchmark interest rate volatility, enabling them to focus on serving customers through loanthe origination of loans and deposit products.acceptance of deposits. The FTP systemmethodology assigns charge rates and credit rates to classes of assets and liabilities, respectively, based on expectedthe estimated amount and timing of cash flows for each transaction. Assigning the FTP rate based on matching the duration and the U.S. swap curve. Matching durationof cash flows allocates interest income and interest expense to each business segment so its resulting net interest income is insulated from future changes in benchmark interest rate risk. In a rising rate environment, the Bancorp benefits from the widening spread between deposit costs and wholesale funding costs. However, therates. The Bancorp’s FTP system credits this benefitmethodology also allocates the contribution to net interest income of the asset-generating and deposit-providing businesses such as Branch Banking and Investment Advisors, on a duration-adjusted basis. The netbasis to better attribute the driver of the performance. As the asset and liability durations are not perfectly matched, the residual impact of the FTP methodology is captured in General Corporate and Other. The charge and credit rates are determined using the FTP rate curve, which is based on an estimate of Fifth Third’s marginal borrowing cost in the wholesale funding markets. The FTP curve is constructed using the U.S. swap curve, brokered CD pricing and unsecured debt pricing.

The Bancorp adjusts the FTP charge and credit rates as dictated by changes in interest rates for various interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Theliabilities and by the review of behavioural assumptions, such as prepayment rates on interest-earning assets and the estimated durations for indeterminate-lived deposits. Key assumptions, including the credit raterates provided for demand deposit accounts, isare reviewed annually based upon the account type, its estimated durationannually. Credit rates for deposit products and the corresponding fed funds, U.S. swap curve or swap rate.charge rates for loan products may be reset more frequently in response to changes in market conditions. The credit rates for several deposit products were reset January 1, 20142016 to reflect the current market rates and updated durationmarket assumptions. These rates were generally higher than those in place during 2013,2015, thus net interest income for deposit providing businessesdeposit-providing business segments was positively impacted during 2014.

The2016. FTP charge rates on assets were affected by the prevailing level of interest rates and by the duration and repricing characteristics of the portfolio. As overall market rates increased, the FTP charge increased for asset-generating business segments are chargedduring 2016.

During the first quarter of 2016, the Bancorp refined its methodology for allocating provision expense based onto the business segments to include charges or benefits associated with changes in criticized commercial loan levels in addition to actual net charge-offs experienced onby the loans and leases owned by each business segment. The results of operations and financial position for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were adjusted to reflect this change. Provision expense attributable to loan and lease growth and changes in ALLL factors are captured in General Corporate and Other. The financial results of the business segments include allocations for shared services and headquarters expenses. Additionally, the business segments form synergies by taking advantage of cross-sell opportunities and when funding operations by accessing the capital markets as a collective unit.

The results of operations and financial position for the years ended December 31, 20132015 and 20122014 were adjusted to reflect the transfer of certain customers and Bancorp employees from Branch Banking to Commercial Banking, effective January 1, 2014. In addition, the 2013 and 2012 balances were adjusted to reflect a changechanges in internal expense allocation methodology.methodologies.

 

NetThe following table summarizes net income (loss) by business segment is summarized in the following table:segment:

 

TABLE 16: BUSINESS SEGMENT NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS      
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014   2013   2012   

Income Statement Data

Commercial Banking

$819  814  714 

Branch Banking

 346  204  144 

Consumer Lending

 (68 183  223 

Investment Advisors

 54  68  43 

General Corporate & Other

 332  557  450 

Net income

 1,483  1,826  1,574 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 2  (10 (2)     

Net income attributable to Bancorp

 1,481  1,836  1,576 

Dividends on preferred stock

 67  37  35 

Net income available to common shareholders

$        1,414            1,799            1,541 

TABLE 19: NET INCOME (LOSS) BY BUSINESS SEGMENT                  

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)    2016       2015      2014      

 

 

Income Statement Data

            

Commercial Banking

    $995       718       884      

Branch Banking

     431       297       350      

Consumer Lending

     20       111       (69)     

Wealth and Asset Management

     93       58       58      

General Corporate and Other

     21       522       260      

 

 

Net income

     1,560       1,706       1,483      

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (4)      (6)      2      

 

 

Net income attributable to Bancorp

     1,564       1,712       1,481      

Dividends on preferred stock

     75       75       67      

 

 

Net income available to common shareholders

    $        1,489       1,637       1,414      

 

 

 

4350  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Commercial Banking

Commercial Banking offers credit intermediation, cash management and financial services to large and middle-market businesses and government and professional customers. In addition to the traditional lending and depository offerings, Commercial Banking

products and services

include global cash management, foreign exchange and international trade finance, derivatives and capital markets services, asset-based lending, real estate finance, public finance, commercial leasing and syndicated finance.

 

 

The following table contains selected financial data for the Commercial Banking segment:

 

TABLE 17: COMMERCIAL BANKING      
TABLE 20: COMMERCIAL BANKING                  

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014   2013   2012               2016      2015      2014       

 

Income Statement Data

            

Net interest income (FTE)(a)

$1,673  1,612  1,550           $1,839      1,646      1,648     

Provision for loan and lease losses

 235  194  249            76      298      141     

Noninterest income:

            

Corporate banking revenue

 429  392  402            430      378      429     

Service charges on deposits

 286  267  251            292      284      280     

Other noninterest income

 172  159  121            185      191      171     

Noninterest expense:

            

Salaries, incentives and employee benefits

 306  310  304       

Personnel costs

     296      303      304     

Other noninterest expense

 1,013  925  883            1,130      1,066      977     

Income before taxes

 1,006  1,001  888       

 

Income before income taxes (FTE)

     1,244      832      1,106     

Applicable income tax expense(a)(b)

 187  187  174            249      114      222     

 

Net income

$819  814  714           $995      718      884     

 

Average Balance Sheet Data

            

Commercial loans, including held for sale

$        51,310            47,762            44,028       

Commercial loans and leases, including held for sale

    $      54,597      53,010      50,718     

Demand deposits

 18,935  17,116  16,742            20,735      20,677      18,381     

Interest checking deposits

 8,068  7,095  7,795            8,582      9,069      7,995     

Savings and money market deposits

 5,946  4,987  3,368            6,686      6,652      5,792     

Other time deposits and certificates - $100,000 and over

 1,399  1,330  1,795       

Foreign office deposits and other deposits

 1,824  1,486  1,298       

Other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over

     1,046      1,230      1,399     

Foreign office deposits

     496      813      1,817     

 
(a)

TheIncludes FTE adjustments included in the above table wereof$2125, $20 and $17 million for the yearsyear endedDecember 31, 20142016, 2013 and 2012, respectively.$21 for both the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

(b)

Applicable income tax expense for all periods includes the tax benefit from tax-exempt income, tax-advantaged investments and business tax credits, partially offset by the effect of certain nondeductible expenses. Refer to the Applicable Income Taxes section of the MD&A for additional information.

 

Comparison of 2014the year ended 2016 with 20132015

Net income was $819$995 million for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016 compared to net income of $814$718 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2015. The increase in net income was driven by increases in net interest income and noninterest income and a decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense.

Net interest income on an FTE basis increased $193 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by an increase in FTP credit rates on core deposits and an increase in average commercial loan and lease balances as well as an increase in their yields of 17 bps for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the prior year. These increases in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016 were partially offset by an increase in FTP charge rates on loans and leases.

Provision for loan and lease losses decreased $222 million from the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in criticized commercial loans during the year ended December 31, 2016 as well as a $102 million charge-off during the third quarter of 2015 associated with the restructuring of a student loan backed commercial credit originated in 2007. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreased to 33 bps for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 45 bps for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Noninterest income increased $54 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by an increase in corporate banking revenue of $52 million driven by increases in lease remarketing fees and syndication fees partially offset by decreases in letter of credit fees and foreign exchange fees.

Noninterest expense increased $57 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in other noninterest expense. The increase in other noninterest expense was primarily driven by increases in corporate overhead allocations, impairment on affordable housing investments and operating lease expense partially offset by a decrease in loan and lease expense.

Average commercial loans increased $1.6 billion from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to increases in average commercial and industrial loans, average commercial construction loans and average commercial leases partially offset by a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans. Average commercial and industrial loans increased $657 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in new origination activity resulting from an increase in demand and line utilization in the first half of the year. Average commercial construction loans increased $926 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of increased demand and draw levels continuing to outpace attrition. Average commercial leases increased $121 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in syndication and participation origination activity. Average commercial mortgage loans decreased $117 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a decline in new loan origination activity driven by increased competition and an increase in paydowns.

Average core deposits decreased $717 million from the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily driven by decreases in average interest checking deposits and average foreign deposits which decreased $487 million and $317 million, respectively, from the year ended December 31, 2015.

51  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the year ended 2015 with 2014

Net income was $718 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to net income of $884 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in net income was the result of increases in net interest income and noninterest income, partially offset by increases in noninterest expense and the provision for loan and lease losses.leases losses and noninterest expense coupled with a decrease in noninterest income.

Net interest income increased $61decreased $2 million from the prior year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to growth in average commercial construction loans, an increase in FTP credits due to an increase in demand deposits and a decrease in FTP charges, partially offsetdriven by a decline in yields of 2919 bps on average commercial loans.loans and leases and increases in FTP charges on loans and leases driven by an increase in average balances. These decreases for the year ended December 31, 2015 were partially offset by increases in FTP credits on core deposits driven by increases in average balances.

Provision for loan and lease losses increased $41$157 million from the prior year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to an increase in criticized commercial loans. The increase also included a $102 million charge-off during the third quarter of 2015 associated with the restructuring of a student loan backed commercial credit originated in 2007. The year ended December 31, 2014 included net charge-offs related to certain impaired commercial and industrial loans in the first and third quarters of 2014. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases increaseddecreased to 45 bps for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 46 bps for 2014 compared to 41 bps for 2013.the year ended December 31, 2014.

Noninterest income increased $69decreased $27 million from the prior year ended December 31, 2014 due primarily to increasesa decrease in corporate banking revenue service charges on deposits andpartially offset by an increase in other noninterest income. Corporate banking revenue increased $37decreased $51 million from 2013the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by increasesdecreases in syndication fees and lease remarketing fees. ServiceThe decrease in syndication fees was the result of decreased activity in the market and the Bancorp’s reduced leveraged loan appetite. The decrease in lease remarketing fees included the impact of impairment charges on deposits of $36 million related to certain operating lease equipment that was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015. Refer to Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. The decrease in corporate banking revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015 was partially offset by higher institutional sales revenue. Other noninterest income

increased $19$20 million from 2013the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by higher commercial deposit revenue which increased due to the acquisition of new customers and product expansion. Other noninterest income increased $13 million from 2013 primarily due to increases in operating lease income and card and processing revenue.gains on loan sales.

Noninterest expense increased $84$88 million from the prior year as a result ofended December 31, 2014 driven by an increase in other noninterest expense, partially offset by a decreaseexpense. The increase in salaries, incentives and benefits. Other

other noninterest expense increased $88 million from 2013was primarily driven by increases in corporate overhead allocations, operating lease expense and impairment on affordable housing investments and operating lease expense. The decrease in salaries, incentives and employee benefits of $4 million was due to a decrease in incentive compensation resulting from a change to the structure of the incentive compensation plans in the first quarter of 2014.investments.

Average commercial loans increased $3.5$2.3 billion from the prior year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to increases in average commercial and industrial loans and average commercial construction loans partially offset by a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans. Average commercial and industrial portfolio loans and average commercial construction portfolio loans increased $3.5$1.4 billion and $689 million,$1.2 billion, respectively, from the prior year ended December 31, 2014 primarily as a result of an increase in new loan origination activity and utilization resulting from a strengthening economyan increase in demand and targeted marketing efforts. Average commercial mortgage portfolio loans decreased $651$552 million from the prior year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to continuedrun-off as the level ofa decline in new originations was less than the repayments on the current portfolio.loan origination activity driven by increased competition and an increase in paydowns.

Average core deposits increased $4.1$3.2 billion from the prior year.year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was the result of strong growth in average demand deposits, average interest checking deposits and average savings and money market deposits and average foreign deposits and other deposits which increased $1.8$2.3 billion, $973 million, $959 million$1.1 billion and $338$860 million, respectively, from to the prior year.

Comparison of 2013 with 2012

Net income was $814 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to net income of $714 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.2014. The increase in net income was primarily driven by increases in net interest income and noninterest income

44  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

and a decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses, partially offset by higher noninterest expense.

Net interest income increased $62 million from 2012 primarily due to growth in average commercial and industrial loans, an increase in FTP credits due to increases in savings and money market deposits and demand deposits and a decrease in FTP charges on loans, partially offset by a decline in yields of 28 bps on average commercial loans.

Provision for loan and lease losses decreased $55 million from 2012 as a result of improved credit trends. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreased to 41 bps for 2013 compared to 57 bps for 2012.

Noninterest income increased $44 million from 2012 primarily due to increases in other noninterest income and service charges on deposits, partially offset by a decrease in corporate banking revenue. The increase in other noninterest income of $38 million from 2012 was primarily due to decreases in negative valuation adjustments on OREO, increases in operating lease income and card and processing revenue, and decreases in negative valuation adjustments on loans held for sale, partially offset by decreases in gains on loan sales. Service charges on deposits increased $16 million from 2012 primarily driven by commercial deposit revenue which increased due to fee repricing and the acquisition of new customers. The decrease in corporate banking revenue of $10 million from the prior year was primarily driven by decreases in lease remarketing and letter of credit fees, partially offset by increases in syndication fees, foreign exchange fees and business lending fees.

Noninterest expense increased $48 million from 2012 as a result of increases in other noninterest expense and salaries, incentives and employee benefits. Other noninterest expense increased $42 million from the prior year primarily driven by increases in impairment on affordable housing investments and operating lease expense, partially offset by a decrease in loan and lease expense. The increase in salaries, incentives and employee benefits of $6 million from 2012 was primarily the result of an increase in base compensation primarily driven by improved production levels.

Average commercial loans increased $3.7 billion from the prior year primarily due to an increase in average commercial and industrial loans, partially offset by a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans. Average commercial and industrial portfolio loans increased $4.9foreign deposits of $1.0 billion from the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of an increase in new origination activity from an increase in demand due to a strengthening economy and targeted marketing efforts. Average commercial mortgage loans decreased $1.1 billion due to continued run-off as the level of new originations was less than the repayments of the existing portfolio.2014.

Average core deposits increased $1.5 billion from December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily driven by strong growth in average savings and money market deposits and average demand deposits, which increased $1.6 billion and $374 million, respectively, from to the prior year, partially offset by a decrease in interest checking deposits of $700 million.

Branch Banking

Branch Banking provides a full range of deposit and loan and lease products to individuals and small businesses through 1,3021,191 full-service Banking Centers. banking centers. Branch Banking offers depository and loan products, such as checking and savings accounts, home equity loans

and lines of credit, credit cards and loans for automobiles and other personal financing needs, as well as products designed to meet the specific needs of small businesses, including cash management services.

 

 

The following table contains selected financial data for the Branch Banking segment:

TABLE 18: BRANCH BANKING      
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014   2013   2012           

Income Statement Data

Net interest income

$1,546  1,356  1,261       

Provision for loan and lease losses

 181  210  268       

Noninterest income:

Service charges on deposits

 272  279  268       

Card and processing revenue

 226  207  195       

Investment advisory revenue

 152  148  129       

Other noninterest income

 70  106  107       

Noninterest expense:

Salaries, incentives and employee benefits

 537  547  537       

Net occupancy and equipment expense

 246  241  238       

Card and processing expense

 133  125  115       

Other noninterest expense

 635  660  579       

Income before taxes

 534  313  223       

Applicable income tax expense

 188  109  79       

Net income

$346  204  144       

Average Balance Sheet Data

Consumer loans, including held for sale

$      14,978            15,223            14,926       

Commercial loans, including held for sale

 1,583  1,807  1,905       

Demand deposits

 11,228  10,750  8,391       

Interest checking deposits

 8,998  8,841  9,080       

Savings and money market deposits

 23,911  22,110  22,031       

Other time deposits and certificates - $100,000 and over

 4,690  4,709  5,386       

4552  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table contains selected financial data for the Branch Banking segment:

TABLE 21: BRANCH BANKING            

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  2016   2015    2014     

 

 

Income Statement Data

      

Net interest income

  $1,669    1,555    1,573     

Provision for loan and lease losses

   138    151    171     

Noninterest income:

      

Service charges on deposits

   265    277    278     

Card and processing revenue

   253    236    227     

Wealth and asset management revenue

   140    157    152     

Other noninterest income

   97    (18   69     

Noninterest expense:

      

Personnel costs

   520    524    539     

Net occupancy and equipment expense

   234    248    246     

Card and processing expense

   128    145    133     

Other noninterest expense

   739    681    669     

 

 

Income before income taxes

   665    458    541     

Applicable income tax expense

   234    161    191     

 

 

Net income

  $431    297    350     

 

 

Average Balance Sheet Data

      

Consumer loans, including held for sale

  $       13,572    14,374    14,978     

Commercial loans, including held for sale

   1,870    2,021    2,175     

Demand deposits

   13,332    12,715    11,781     

Interest checking deposits

   9,659    9,128    9,071     

Savings and money market deposits

   25,974    25,342    24,065     

Other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over

   5,205    5,161    4,690     

 

 

 

Comparison of 2014the year ended 2016 with 20132015

Net income was $346$431 million for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016 compared to net income of $204$297 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2015. The increase was driven by an increase in net interest income and declines in the provision for loan and lease losses and noninterest expense, partially offset by a decrease in noninterest income.

Net interest income increased $190 million from the prior year primarily driven by increases in the FTP credit rates for savings and money market deposits, demand deposits and interest checking deposits and a decrease in the FTP charges on loans and leases. These increases were partially offset by declines in yields on average commercial loans and a decrease in interest income relating to the Bancorp’s decision to no longer enroll new customers in the deposit advance product.

Provision for loan and lease losses for 2014 decreased $29 million from the prior year as a result of improved credit trends. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreased to 110 bps for 2014 compared to 123 bps for 2013.

Noninterest income decreased $20 million from the prior year. The decrease was primarily driven by decreases in other noninterest income and service charges on deposits, partially offset by an increase in card and processing revenue. Other noninterest income decreased $36 million from 2013 primarily due to $20 million in impairment charges in 2014 for branches and land. For more information on these impairment charges, refer to Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The remaining decrease in other noninterest income was primarily due to decreases in gains on loan sales and mortgage origination fees and retail service fees. Service charges on deposits decreased $7 million from 2013 primarily due to a decrease in consumer checking and savings fees from a decline in the percentage of consumer customers being charged service fees. Card and processing revenue increased $19 million from the prior year primarily as a result of an increase in the number of actively used cards as well as higher processing fees related to additional ATM locations.

Noninterest expense decreased $22 million from the prior year, primarily driven by decreases in other noninterest expense and salaries, incentives and employee benefits, partially offset by increases in card and processing expense and net occupancy and equipment expense. Other noninterest expense decreased $25 million from the prior year due to lower marketing expense and loan and lease expense. Salaries, incentives and employee benefits decreased $10 million from the prior year primarily driven by lower compensation costs due to a decline in the number of full-time equivalent employees. Card and processing expense increased $8 million from 2013 primarily due to higher rewards expense relating to credit cards and increased fraud-related charges. Net occupancy and equipment expense increased $5 million from 2013 primarily due to an increase in rent expense driven by additional ATM locations.

Average consumer loans decreased $245 million in 2014 primarily due to a decrease in average home equity loans of $382 million as payoffs exceeded new advances and new loan production. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in average credit card loans of $147 million from the prior year primarily due to an increase in open and active accounts driven by the volume of new accounts.

Average core deposits increased $2.4 billion from the prior year primarily driven by net growth in average savings and money market deposits of $1.8 billion and growth in average demand deposits of $478 million.

Comparison of 2013 with 2012

Net income was $204 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to net income of $144 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was driven by an increase in net interest income and noninterest income andas well as a declinedecrease in the provision for loan and lease losses partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense.

Net interest income increased $95$114 million from 2012the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by an increase in the benefits from FTP credit rates for savings and money marketcredits on core deposits demand deposits and interest checking deposits,partially offset by a decrease in theinterest income on residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, credit card loans and other consumer loans driven by a decline in average balances. Additionally, net interest income was negatively impacted by an increase in FTP chargescharge rates on loans and leases and a decline in interest expense on core deposits due to favorable shifts from certificates of deposit to lower cost transaction deposits.leases.

Provision for loan and lease losses for 2013 decreased $58$13 million from 2012 as a result ofthe year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to improved credit trends. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreased to 12391 bps for 2013the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 15996 bps for 2012.the year ended December 31, 2015.

Noninterest income increased $41$103 million from 2012.the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily driven by increasesan increase in investment advisory revenue, card and processing revenue and service charges on deposits. Investment advisory revenue increased $19other noninterest income of $115 million from 2013 primarily due to increased securitiesimpairment charges on bank premises and brokerage fees dueequipment of $32 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to an$109 million recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, the increase in equityother noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2016 included a gain of $19 million on the sale of certain retail branch operations in the St. Louis and bond market values. CardPittsburgh MSAs in the first and processing revenue increased $12 million from the prior year due to higher transaction volumes, higher levelssecond quarters of consumer spending and the benefit2016, respectively, as well as a gain of new products. Service charges on deposits increased $11 million from 2012 primarily due to an increase in account maintenance fees due toon the full year impactsale of new deposit product offerings.the agent bankcard loan portfolio during the second quarter of 2016.

Noninterest expense increased $104$23 million from 2012,the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by increasesan increase in salaries, incentives and employee benefits,other noninterest expense partially offset by decreases in card and processing expense and othernet occupancy and equipment expense.

Other noninterest expense. Salaries, incentives and employee benefits increased from 2012 primarily due to an increase in bonus and incentive compensation associated with improved securities and brokerage revenue. Card and processing expense increased $58 million from 2012 duethe year ended December 31, 2015 primarily to increases in debit and credit card transaction volumes, consumer spending, fraud insurance costs and credit card rewards expense. The increase in other noninterest expense was primarily due todriven by an increase in corporate overhead allocations during 2013 comparedallocations. Card and processing expense decreased $17 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to 2012.the impact of renegotiated service contracts. Net occupancy and equipment expense decreased $14 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a decrease in rent expense driven by a reduction in the number of full-service banking centers and ATM locations.

Average consumer loans increased $297 million in 2013 primarily due to increases in average residential mortgage portfolio loans of $942decreased $802 million from the prior year asended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by a result of continued retention of certain shorter term residential mortgage loans. In addition, average credit card loans increased from 2012 due to increases in average balances per account and the volume of new customers. These increases were partially offset by decreasesdecrease in average home equity portfolioloans and average residential mortgage loans of $743$488 million and $262 million, respectively, as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Average commercial loans decreased $151 million from 2012the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans and average commercial and industrial loans of $100 million and $46 million, respectively, as payoffs exceeded new loan production.

Average core deposits increased $1.7 billion from the prior year asended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by growth in average savings and money market deposits of $632 million, growth in average demand deposits of $617 million and growth in average interest checking deposits of $531 million. The growth in average savings and money market deposits, average demand deposits and average interest checking deposits was driven by an increase in average balances per customer account and acquisition of new customers.

Comparison of the year ended 2015 with 2014

Net income was $297 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to net income of $350 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was driven by decreases in noninterest income and net interest income as well as an increase in noninterest expense partially offset by a decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses.

53  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net interest income decreased $18 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily driven by changes made to the Bancorp’s deposit advance product beginning January 1, 2015 and a decline in interest income on home equity loans and residential mortgage loans driven by decreases in average balances partially offset by a decrease in FTP charges due to excess customer liquidity and a continued lowthe decrease in these average balances. The decline in net interest rate environmentincome was partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on core deposits due to a decline in the run-off of higher pricedrates paid and by increases in the benefits from FTP credits for demand deposits, other time deposits and interest checking deposits.

Provision for loan and lease losses decreased $20 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to improved credit trends. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreased to 96 bps for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 106 bps for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Noninterest income decreased $74 million from the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was primarily driven by decreases in other noninterest income partially offset by increases in card and processing revenue and wealth and asset management revenue. Other noninterest income decreased $87 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily driven by impairment charges on bank premises and equipment of $109 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $20 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Card and processing revenue increased $9 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to an increase in the number of actively used cards and an increase in customer spend volume. Wealth and asset management revenue increased $5 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to an increase of $3 million in recurring securities brokerage fees driven by higher sales volume and an increase of $2 million in private client service fees due to an increase in personal asset management fees.

Noninterest expense increased $11 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily driven by increases in other noninterest expense and card and processing expense partially offset by a decrease in personnel costs. Other noninterest expense increased $12 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 due

to higher operational losses and an increase in corporate overhead allocations. Card and processing expense increased $12 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 driven by increased fraud prevention related expenses. Personnel costs decreased $15 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 driven by a decrease in employee benefits expense due to changes in the Bancorp’s employee benefit plan implemented in 2015 as well as a decrease in base compensation due to a decline in the number of full-time equivalent employees.

Average consumer loans decreased $604 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to a decrease in average home equity loans and average residential mortgage loans of $336 million and $261 million, respectively, as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Average commercial loans decreased $154 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans and average commercial and industrial loans of $97 million and $63 million, respectively, as payoffs exceeded new loan production.

Average core deposits increased $2.6 billion from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily driven by growth in average savings and money market deposits of $1.3 billion and growth in average demand deposits of $934 million. The growth in average savings and money market deposits was driven by a promotional product offering and the growth in average demand deposits was driven by an increase in average account balances.

Consumer Lending

Consumer Lending includes the Bancorp’s residential mortgage, home equity, automobile and other indirect lending activities. LendingDirect lending activities include the origination, retention and servicing of residential mortgage and home equity loans or lines of credit, sales and securitizations of those loans, pools of loans or lines of credit and all associated hedging activities. Indirect lending activities include extending loans to consumers through correspondent lenders and automobile dealers.

 

46  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table contains selected financial data for the Consumer Lending segment:

 

TABLE 19: CONSUMER LENDING      
TABLE 22: CONSUMER LENDING            

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014  2013  2012          2016    2015    2014       

 

Income Statement Data

      

Net interest income

$257  312  314         $            248    249    258      

Provision for loan and lease losses

 156  92  176          44    44    156      

Noninterest income:

      

Mortgage banking net revenue

 304  687  830          277    341    305      

Other noninterest income

 42  61  46          26    66    45      

Noninterest expense:

      

Salaries, incentives and employee benefits

 122  215  231       

Personnel costs

   195    185    181      

Other noninterest expense

 430  470  439          280    255    377      

(Loss) income before taxes

 (105 283  344       

Applicable income tax (benefit) expense

 (37 100  121       

Net (loss) income

$(68 183  223       

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   32    172    (106)     

Applicable income tax expense (benefit)

   12    61    (37)     

 

Net income (loss)

  $20    111    (69)     

 

Average Balance Sheet Data

      

Residential mortgage loans, including held for sale

$8,866              10,222              10,143         $10,530    9,251    8,866     

Home equity

 483  560  643          356    424    496     

Automobile loans, including held for sale

       11,517  11,409  11,191       

Other consumer loans and leases

 19  16  30       

Automobile loans

   10,172    11,341    11,517     

Other consumer loans and leases, including held for sale

   -    11    19     

 

 

Comparison of 2014the year ended 2016 with 20132015

Consumer Lending incurred a net loss of $68Net income was $20 million in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to net income of $183$111 million in 2013.for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was driven by decreasesa decrease in net interest income and noninterest income and an increase in noninterest expense.

        Net interest income decreased $1 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by an increase in FTP charges on loans and leases partially offset by an increase in FTP credit rates on demand deposits. Net interest income was also impacted by an increase in average residential mortgage loan balances partially offset by a decline in average automobile loan balances.

54  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The provision for loan and lease losses was flat from the year ended December 31, 2015. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases was 22 bps for both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Noninterest income decreased $104 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 driven by decreases in mortgage banking net revenue and other noninterest income. Mortgage banking net revenue decreased $64 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by a $79 million decrease in net mortgage servicing revenue partially offset by a $15 million increase in mortgage origination fees and gains on loan sales. Refer to the Noninterest Income subsection of the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A for additional information on the fluctuations in mortgage banking net revenue. Other noninterest income decreased $40 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a $37 million gain on the sale of residential mortgage loans held for sale classified as TDRs in the first quarter of 2015.

Noninterest expense increased $35 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 driven by increases in other noninterest expense and personnel costs. Other noninterest expense increased $25 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by increases in operational losses and corporate overhead allocations. Personnel costs increased $10 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by increases in base compensation and variable compensation.

Average consumer loans and leases increased $31 million from the year ended December 31, 2015. Average residential mortgage loans, including held for sale, increased $1.3 billion from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by the continued retention of certain agency conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans. Average automobile loans decreased $1.2 billion from the year ended December 31, 2015 as payoffs exceeded new loan production.

Comparison of the year ended 2015 with 2014

Net income was $111 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to a net loss of $69 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was driven by decreases in noninterest expense and the provision for loan and lease losses as well as an increase in noninterest income partially offset by a decrease in noninterest expense.net interest income.

Net interest income decreased $55$9 million from the prior year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to decreases indriven by lower yields on average residential mortgage loans and average automobile loans and a decline in average home equity loans as well as lower yields on average automobile loans partially offset by a decreasedecreases in FTP chargescharge rates on loans and leases.

The provision for loan and lease losses increased $64decreased $112 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 as the prior year primarily due toincluded an $87 million charge-off related to the transfer of

certain residential mortgage loans from the portfolio to held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2014, partially offset by2014. The decrease was also due to improved delinquency metrics on residential mortgage loans and home equity loans. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases increaseddecreased to 22 bps for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 77 bps for 2014 compared to 46 bps for 2013.the year ended December 31, 2014.

Noninterest income decreased $402increased $57 million from 2013the year ended December 31, 2014 as a result of decreasesincreases in mortgage banking net revenue of $383 million and other noninterest income of $19 million. The decrease in mortgageincome. Mortgage banking net revenue was due toincreased $36 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 driven by a $293$16 million declineincrease in mortgage origination fees and gains on loan sales due to a decline in mortgage originations and a $90$20 million decreaseincrease in net mortgage servicing revenue. Refer toOther noninterest income increased $21 million from the Noninterest Income section of MD&A for additional informationyear ended December 31, 2014 primarily driven by a $37 million gain on the fluctuationssale of residential mortgage loans held for sale classified as TDRs in mortgage banking net revenue. Thethe first quarter of 2015. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in retail service fees.

Noninterest expense decreased $118 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 driven by a decrease in other noninterest income was primarily due to a $16 million decrease in securities gains.

Noninterest expense decreased $133 million due to decreases of $93 million in salaries, incentives and benefits and $40 million in other noninterest expense from the prior year. The decrease in salaries, incentives and employee benefits was primarily the result of lower mortgage loan originations.$122 million. The decrease in other noninterest expense was primarily due to decreasesdecreased legal expenses and operational losses partially offset by an increase in loan and lease expense and corporate overhead allocations.

Average consumer loans and leases decreased $1.3 billionincreased $129 million from the prior year. Average residential mortgage loans, including held for sale, decreased $1.4 billion from the prior year due primarily to a decline of $1.5 billion in average residential mortgage loans held for sale from reduced origination volumes driven by a reduction in refinance activity and the exit of the broker origination channel

during 2014. This decrease was partially offset by the continued retention of certain shorter term residential mortgage loans originated through the Bancorp’s retail branches and the decision to retain certain conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans originated during the year ended December 31, 2014. Average residential mortgage loans increased $385 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to the continued retention of certain agency conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans. Average automobile loans and average home equity loans decreased $77$176 million and $72 million, respectively, from the prior year ended December 31, 2014 as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Average automobile loans, including held for sale, increased $108 million for the current year from the prior year due to new originations exceeding run-off.

Comparison of 2013 with 2012

Net income was $183 million in 2013 compared to net income of $223 million in 2012. The decrease was driven by a decrease in noninterest income and an increase in noninterest expense, partially offset by a decline in the provision for loan and lease losses.

Net interest income decreased $2 million from 2012 due primarily to lower yields on average residential mortgage and automobile loans, partially offset by a decrease in FTP charges on loans and leases and increases in average residential mortgage and average automobile loans.

The provision for loan and lease losses decreased $84 million from 2012 as delinquency metrics and underlying loss trends improved across all consumer loan types. Net charge-offs as a percent of average loans and leases decreased to 46 bps for 2013 compared to 88 bps for 2012.

Noninterest income decreased $128 million from 2012 primarily due to a decrease in mortgage banking net revenue of $143 million, partially offset by an increase in other noninterest income of $15 million. The decrease in mortgage banking net revenue was primarily due to a decrease in gains on loan sales of $368 million as a result of a decrease in profit margins on sold residential mortgage loans coupled with a decrease in residential mortgage loan originations, partially offset by a $223 million increase in net residential mortgage servicing revenue. The increase in net residential mortgage servicing revenue was driven by an increase of $202 million in net valuation adjustments on MSRs and free-standing derivatives entered into to economically hedge the MSRs and a decrease of $20 million in servicing rights amortization. The increase in other noninterest income was primarily due to a $12 million increase in securities gains and a $7 million decline in losses on the sale of OREO.

47  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Noninterest expense increased $15 million driven by an increase of $31 million in other noninterest expense, partially offset by a decrease of $16 million in salaries, incentives and employee benefits compared to 2012. The increase in other noninterest expense was primarily due to higher litigation expense and an increase in corporate overhead allocations, partially offset by a decrease in loan and lease expense due to lower appraisal costs. The decrease in salaries, incentives and employee benefits was due to a decline in incentive compensation driven primarily by a decline in originations during 2013 compared to 2012, partially offset by an increase in deferred compensation for 2013 compared to 2012.

Average consumer loans and leases increased $200 million from 2012. Average residential mortgage loans, including held for sale, increased $79 million for 2013 compared to 2012 due to strong refinancing activity that occurred in the first half of 2013. Average automobile loans increased $218 million in 2013 compared to 2012 due to an increase in originations primarily driven by modest improvement in general economic conditions and a continued low interest rate environment. Average home equity portfolio loans decreased $83 million for 2013 compared to 2012 as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Average other consumer loans and

leases decreased $14 million in 2013 resulting from a decrease in average consumer leases due to run-off as the Bancorp discontinued automobile leasing in 2008, partially offset by an increase in average other consumer loans.

Investment AdvisorsWealth and Asset Management

Investment AdvisorsWealth and Asset Management provides a full range of investment alternatives for individuals, companies and not-for-profit organizations. Investment AdvisorsWealth and Asset Management is made up of four main businesses: FTS, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp; ClearArc Capital, Inc. (formerly FTAM), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp; Fifth Third Private Bank; and Fifth Third Institutional Services. FTS offers full servicefull-service retail brokerage services to individual clients and broker dealerbroker-dealer services to the institutional marketplace. ClearArc Capital, Inc. provides asset management services. Fifth Third Private Bank offers holistic strategies to affluent clients in wealth planning, investing, insurance and wealth protection. Fifth Third Institutional Services provides advisory services for institutional clients including states and municipalities.

 

 

The following table contains selected financial data for the Investment Advisors segment:

TABLE 20: INVESTMENT ADVISORS      
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014   2013   2012         

Income Statement Data

Net interest income

$121  154  117       

Provision for loan and lease losses

 3  2  10       

Noninterest income:

Investment advisory revenue

 397  384  366       

Other noninterest income

 13  22  30       

Noninterest expense:

Salaries, incentives and employee benefits

 162  159  161       

Other noninterest expense

 283  294  276       

Income before taxes

 83  105  66       

Applicable income tax expense

 29  37  23       

Net income

$54  68  43       

Average Balance Sheet Data

Loans and leases

$        2,270            2,014            1,877       

Core deposits

 9,535  8,815  7,709       

Comparison of 2014 with 2013

Net income was $54 million in 2014 compared to net income of $68 million for 2013. The decrease in net income was primarily due to a decrease in net interest income, partially offset by a decrease in noninterest expense and an increase in noninterest income.

Net interest income decreased $33 million from 2013 primarily due to a decrease in the FTP credit rate on certain interest checking deposits.

Noninterest income increased $4 million from the prior year due to a $13 million increase in investment advisory revenue primarily driven by an increase of $12 million in private client services revenue due to growth in personal asset management fees, partially offset by a decrease in securities broker fees due to a decline in transactional brokerage revenue. This increase was partially offset by a $9 million decrease in other noninterest income as other noninterest income in the prior year included gains on the sale of certain advisory contracts.

Noninterest expense decreased $8 million from the prior year primarily due to a decrease in other noninterest expense driven by decreases in operational losses, marketing expense and corporate overhead allocations.

Average loans and leases increased $256 million from the prior year primarily driven by increases in average residential mortgage loans and average commercial mortgage loans, partially offset by a decrease in average home equity loans. Average core deposits increased $720 million from the prior year due to growth in average interest checking balances as customers have opted to maintain excess funds in liquid transaction accounts as a result of interest rates remaining near historic lows.

Comparison of 2013 with 2012

Net income was $68 million in 2013 compared to net income of $43 million for 2012. The increase in net income was primarily due to increases in net interest income and noninterest income and a decrease in the provision for loan and lease losses, partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense.

Net interest income increased $37 million from 2012 due to an increase in FTP credits resulting from an increase in interest checking deposits.

Provision for loan and lease losses decreased $8 million from the prior year. Net charge-offs as a percent of average loans and leases decreased to 9 bps compared to 53 bps for the prior year reflecting improved credit trends during 2013.

4855  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table contains selected financial data for the Wealth and Asset Management segment:

TABLE 23: WEALTH AND ASSET MANAGEMENT            

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  2016    2015    2014       

 

 

Income Statement Data

      

Net interest income

  $168    128    121       

Provision for loan and lease losses

   1    3    1       

Noninterest income:

      

Wealth and asset management revenue

   391    406    397       

Other noninterest income

   8    12    13       

Noninterest expense:

      

Personnel costs

   168    170    162       

Other noninterest expense

   254    285    281       

 

 

Income before income taxes

   144    88    87       

Applicable income tax expense

   51    30    29       

 

 

Net income

  $93    58    58       

 

 

Average Balance Sheet Data

      

Loans and leases, including held for sale

  $        3,135            2,805            2,270       

Core deposits

   8,554    9,357    9,535       

 

 

 

NoninterestComparison of the year ended 2016 with 2015

Net income was $93 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to net income of $58 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in net income was primarily driven by an increase in net interest income as well as a decrease in noninterest expense partially offset by a decrease in noninterest income.

Net interest income increased $10$40 million compared to 2012from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to an increase in investment advisory revenue,FTP credit rates on core deposits and an increase in interest income on loans and leases driven by an increase in average balances on average residential mortgage loans and average other consumer loans and leases as well as higher yields on average commercial and industrial loans and average other consumer loans and leases. This increase was partially offset by an increase in FTP charges on loans and leases driven by an increase in average balances.

Provision for loan and leases losses decreased $2 million from the year ended December 31, 2015.

Noninterest income decreased $19 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a $15 million decrease in wealth and asset management revenue driven by a $15 million decrease in securities and brokerage fees as a result of lower transactional fees partially offset by an increase in managed account fee-based business.

Noninterest expense decreased $33 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by a $31 million decrease in other noninterest income. Theexpense primarily due to a decrease in corporate overhead allocations partially offset by an increase in investment advisory revenue wasoperational losses.

Average loans and leases increased $330 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to increases in average residential mortgage loans and average other consumer loans driven by increases in new loan origination activity.

Average core deposits decreased $803 million from the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to a decline in average interest checking balances partially offset by an increase in average savings and money market deposits.

Comparison of the year ended 2015 with 2014

Net income was $58 million for both the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Net interest income increased $7 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to increases in interest income on loans and leases and FTP credits on demand deposits both due to increases in average balances as well as an increase in FTP credits on

interest checking deposits due to an increase in FTP credit rates. These increases were partially offset by increases in FTP charges on loans and leases driven by increases in average balances.

Provision for loan and leases losses increased $2 million from the year ended December 31, 2015.

Noninterest income increased $8 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to a $9 million increase in wealth and asset management revenue driven by increases in recurring securities and brokerage fees and private client service fees due to strong production and an increase in equity and bond market values. The decrease in other noninterest income was due to a decrease in gains on sales of held for sale loans and the impact of the gain on the sale of certain FTAM funds in the third quarter of 2012.fees.

Noninterest expense increased $16$12 million compared to 2012from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to an increase in other noninterest expense primarily driven by increases in corporate allocationspersonnel costs due to higher incentive compensation and fraud losses.base compensation.

Average loans and leases increased $137$535 million compared to 2012from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily driven by increases in average residential mortgage loans and average other consumer and average commercial and industrial loans as a result of increases in new loan origination activity partially offset by a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans. home equity loans as payoffs exceeded new loan production.

Average core deposits increased $1.1 billion compared to 2012decreased $178 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to growtha decrease in average interest checking as customers have opted to maintain excess fundsbalances partially offset by increases in liquid transaction accounts as a result of the low interest rate environment.average savings and money market deposits and average demand deposits.

General Corporate and Other

General Corporate and Other includes the unallocated portion of the investment securities portfolio, securities gains and losses, certain non-core deposit funding, unassigned equity, unallocated provision expense in excess of net charge-offs or a benefit from the reduction of the ALLL, representation and warranty expense in excess of actual losses or a benefit from the reduction of representation and warranty reserves, the payment of preferred stock dividends and certain support activities and other items not attributed to the business segments.

Comparison of 2014the year ended 2016 with 20132015

Results for 2014 and 2013 were impacted by a benefit of $260 million and $269 million, respectively, due to reductions in the ALLL. Net interest income decreased $260 million from $147the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily driven by an increase in FTP credits on deposits allocated to business segments primarily due to an increase in FTP credit rates as well as an increase in interest expense on long-term debt. This decrease in net interest income was partially offset by an increase in interest income on taxable securities and an increase in the benefit related to the FTP charges on loans and leases. The provision for loan and leases losses was $84 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to a benefit of $100 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily due to decreases in 2013the allocation of provision expense to the business segments.

56  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Noninterest income decreased $359 million from December 31, 2015. The decrease included the impact of a gain of $331 million on the sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares and a gain of $89 million on both the sale and exercise of a portion of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC, both of which were recognized in the fourth quarter of 2015. In 2016, the Bancorp recognized a gain of $9 million on the exercise of the remaining warrant with Vantiv Holding, LLC. The decrease was also due to the negative valuation adjustment related to the Visa total return swap of $56 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with $37 million for the prior year. In addition, the positive valuation adjustments on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC were $64 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the positive valuation adjustments of $236 million during the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in noninterest income was partially offset by a $280 million gain recognized during the third quarter of 2016 from the termination and settlement of gross cash flows from existing Vantiv, Inc. TRAs and the expected obligation to terminate and settle the remaining Vantiv, Inc. TRA cash flows upon the exercise of put or call options compared with a $49 million gain recognized by the Bancorp in 2015 for the payment from Vantiv, Inc. to terminate a portion of the Vantiv, Inc. TRA. Noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2016 also included a gain of $11 million on the sale-leaseback of an office complex during the third quarter of 2016 and a gain of $33 million associated with the annual TRA payment during the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to a $31 million gain during the prior year. Additionally, equity method earnings from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC increased $3 million from December 31, 2015.

Noninterest expense was $90 million and $62 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase was primarily due to increases in personnel costs and the provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments partially offset by an increase in corporate overhead allocations from General Corporate and Other to the other business segments.

Comparison of the year ended 2015 with 2014

Net interest income decreased $24 million from the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to increases in FTP credits andon deposits allocated to business segments driven by increases in average deposits. The remaining decrease in net interest income was due to an increase in interest expense on long-term debt and a

decrease in the benefit related to the FTP charges on loans and leases partially offset by an increase in interest income on taxable securities. The provision for loan and leases losses was a benefit of $100 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to a benefit of $154 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 due to decreases in the allocation of provision expense to the business segments and reductions in the ALLL.

Noninterest income was $256$822 million for 2014the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $659$253 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in 2013. Noninterestnoninterest income included the impact of a gain of $125$331 million on the sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares in the second quarter of 2014 compared to gains totaling $327 million during the second and third quarters of 2013. The Bancorp also recognized gains of $23 million and $9 million associated with a tax receivable agreement with Vantiv, Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively.2015 compared to a gain of $125 million in 2014. The positive valuation adjustments on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC were $31$236 million and $206$31 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Bancorp recognized a gain of $89 million on both the sale and 2013, respectively.exercise of a portion of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC. Additionally, the equityBancorp recognized a gain of $49 million from the payment from Vantiv, Inc. to terminate a portion of a TRA and also recognized a gain of $31 million associated with the annual TRA payment during the fourth quarter of 2015. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $23 million associated with the TRA during the fourth quarter of 2014. Equity method earnings from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC decreased $29increased $15 million from 2013.the year ended December 31, 2014. Noninterest income also included $38$37 million in negative valuation adjustments related to the Visa total return swap for the year ended December 31, 20142015 compared to $31$38 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014.

Noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 20142015 was an expense of $62 million compared to a benefit of $12 million compared to an expense of $159$14 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014. The decreaseincrease was driven by decreasesprimarily due to an increase in compensation expense,personnel costs and an increase in the provision for the reserve for unfunded commitments as well as increases in FDIC insurance and other taxes, donations expense, technology and communications expense and marketing expense. The increase was partially offset by decreased litigation and regulatory activity partially offset by a decrease in the benefit from other noninterest expense driven by decreasedand increased corporate overhead allocations from General Corporate and Other to the other business segments.

Comparison of 2013 with 2012

Results for 2013 and 2012 were impacted by a benefit of $269 million and $400 million, respectively, due to reductions in the ALLL. The decrease in provision expense was primarily due to a decrease in nonperforming loans and leases and improvements in delinquency metrics and underlying loss trends. Net interest income decreased from $370 million in 2012 to $147 million for 2013 primarily due to a decrease in FTP charges partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on long-term debt. Noninterest income increased $278 million compared to 2012 primarily due to positive valuation adjustments on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC which increased $139 million in 2013 compared to 2012. In addition, gains of $242 million and $85 million were recognized on the sales of Vantiv, Inc. shares in the second and third quarters of 2013, respectively, compared to gains of $115 million related to the Vantiv, Inc. IPO and $157 million on the sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares in 2012. The Bancorp also recognized a gain of $9 million associated with a tax receivable agreement with Vantiv, Inc. in the fourth quarter of 2013. The equity method earnings from the Bancorp’s interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC increased $16 million from 2012.

Noninterest expense decreased $286 million compared to 2012 due to decreases in other noninterest expense and total personnel costs. Other noninterest expense decreased due to a decrease in debt extinguishment costs, an increase in corporate overhead allocations assigned to the segments, a decrease in loan and lease expense and a decrease in losses and adjustments. Debt extinguishment costs decreased $161 million during 2013 compared to 2012. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bancorp incurred $8 million of debt extinguishment costs associated with the redemption of outstanding TruPS issued by57  Fifth Third Capital Trust IV. During 2012, the Bancorp incurred $160 million of debt extinguishment costs associated with the redemption of certain TruPS and the termination of certain FHLB debt. Loan and lease expense decreased $72 million during 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a decrease in loan closing fees due to a decline in mortgage originations. Losses and adjustments decreased $17 million compared to 2012 primarily driven by a decline in the provision for representation and warranty claims partially offset by an increase in litigation expense. The provision for representation and warranty claims changed from a $49 million expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 to a benefit of $39 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 due to the Bancorp recording significant additions to the reserve in 2012 as the result of additional information obtained from FHLMC regarding their file selection criteria which enabled the Bancorp to better estimate the losses that were probable on loans sold to FHLMC with representation and warranty provisions. In addition, 2013 included a decrease in the representation and warranty reserve due to improving underlying repurchase metrics and the settlement with FHLMC. The decrease in representation and warranty expense was partially offset by a $54 million increase in litigation expense. Total personnel costs decreased $38 million from 2012 due primarily to decreases in incentive compensation and employee benefits.

49  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

FOURTH QUARTER REVIEW

 

The Bancorp’s 20142016 fourth quarter net income available to common shareholders was $362$372 million, or $0.43$0.49 per diluted share, compared to net income available to common shareholders of $328$501 million, or $0.39$0.65 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 20142016 and net income available to common shareholders of $383$634 million, or $0.43$0.79 per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2013. Fourth quarter 2014 earnings included a $56 million positive adjustment on the valuation of the warrant associated with the sale of Vantiv Holding, LLC, a $23 million gain from Vantiv Inc. pursuant to a tax receivable agreement and a $19 million charge related to the valuation of the total return swap entered into as part of the 2009 sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares. Third quarter 2014 results included a $53 million negative adjustment on the valuation of the warrant associated with the sale of Vantiv Holding, LLC. Fourth quarter 2013 earnings included a $91 million positive adjustment on the valuation of the warrant associated with the sale of Vantiv Holding, LLC, $69 million in net charges to increase litigation reserves, an $18 million charge related to the valuation of the total return swap entered into as part of the 2009 sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares and $8 million of debt extinguishment costs associated with the redemption of TruPS issued by Fifth Third Capital Trust IV.2015.

Fourth quarter 2014 netNet interest income on an FTE basis was $909 million during the fourth quarter of $888 million2016 and decreased $20$4 million from the third quarter of 20142016 and $17increased $5 million from the same period a year ago. Interest income decreased $7 millionfourth quarter of 2015. The decrease from the third quarter of 20142016 was primarily driven by the effectsimpact of loan repricingrefunds to be offered to certain bankcard customers during the fourth quarter of 2016, partially offset by increased short-term market rates and lower averagehigher investment securities balances. Interest expense increased $13 million from the third quarter of 2014 primarily driven by the issuance of $850 million of long-term debt during the third quarter and higher deposit costs during the quarter. The decreaseincrease in net interest income in comparison to the fourth quarter of 20132015 was driven by the effects of loan repricing and higher interest expense from increasedlong-term debt balances, partially offset by higher average investment securities balances and average loan balances.increased short-term market rates, partially offset by the aforementioned bankcard refunds.

Fourth quarter 20142016 noninterest income of $653$620 million increased $133decreased $220 million compared to the third quarter of 20142016 and decreased $50$484 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2013.2015. The increasedecrease from the third quarter of 20142016 was primarily due to increasesa decrease in other noninterest income and corporate banking revenue. The year-over-year declinedecrease was primarily the result of lowerdecreases in other noninterest income and mortgage banking net revenue and other noninterest income, partially offset by higher corporate banking revenue.

Service charges on deposits of $142$141 million decreased $3$2 million from the previous quarter and were flatdecreased $3 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2013.2015. The decrease from the third quarter of 20142016 was primarily due to a decreasedecreases in commercial service charges due to aand retail service charges. The decrease in treasury management fees andfrom the fourth quarter of 2015 was driven by a decrease in retail service charges due to lower overdraft occurrences.consumer checking fees.

Corporate banking revenue of $120$101 million increased $20decreased $10 million fromcompared to the previous quarter and $26decreased $3 million from the fourth quarter of 2013.2015. The increase fromdecrease compared to the third quarter of 2014 was primarily due to a $13 million increasedriven by decreases in syndicationinstitutional sales revenue and lease remarketing fees, during the fourth quarter of 2014 due to the investment in resources in the commercial business. In addition, the increase from the third quarter of 2014 was due to an increase in business lending fees andpartially offset by an increase in foreign exchange fees. The year-over-year decrease was driven by lower lease remarketing fees and letter of credit fees, partially offset by a decrease inhigher foreign exchange fees and institutional sales revenue. The year-over-year increase was driven by higher syndication fees and lease remarketing fees. The increase in syndication fees from the fourth quarter of 2013 was due to the investment in resources in the commercial business and a strengthening economy. The increase in lease remarketing fees year-over-year was impacted by a $9 million write-down of equipment value on an operating lease during the fourth quarter of 2013.

Investment advisory revenue of $100 million decreased $3 million from the previous quarter and increased $2 million from the fourth quarter of 2013. The decline from the third quarter of 2014 was due to a decrease in private client service fees and insurance fees relative to elevated levels in the third quarter, as well as a decrease in securities and brokerage fees due to a continued shift from transaction-based fees to recurring revenue streams. Theyear-over-year increase was due to an increase in personal asset management fees due to market-related growth, partially offset by a decrease in securities and brokerage fees.

Mortgage banking net revenue was $61 million in both the fourth and third quarters of 2014 and $126$65 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. Fourth quarter 2014 originations were $1.7 billion,2016 compared with $2.1 billionto $66 million in the previousthird quarter of 2016 and $2.6 billion$74 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. Fourth quarter 2014 originations resulted2015. The decrease in gains of $36 million on mortgages sold,mortgage banking net revenue compared with gains of $34 million duringto the previous quarter and $60 million during the fourththird quarter of 2013. The increase from the prior quarter2016 was driven by higher gain on sale margins,lower production gains, partially offset by lower production.positive valuation adjustments. The decrease from the prior year was due to lower production, including Fifth Third’s exit frommargins during the broker channel, partially offset by higher gainfourth quarter of 2016. Fourth quarter 2016 originations were $2.7 billion, compared with $2.9 billion in the previous quarter and $1.8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2015. Fourth quarter 2016 originations resulted in gains of $30 million on sale margins. Mortgagemortgages sold, compared with gains of $61 million during the previous quarter and $37 million during the fourth quarter of 2015. Gross mortgage servicing fees were $60$48 million in the fourth quarter of 2014, $612016, $49 million in the third quarter of 20142016 and $63$53 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.2015. Mortgage banking net revenue is also affected by net servicing asset valuation adjustments, which include MSR amortization and MSR valuation adjustments, includingmark-to-market adjustments on free-standing derivatives used to economically hedge the MSR portfolio. These net servicing asset valuation adjustments were negative $34MSR amortization was $35 million induring both the fourth and third quarters of 20142016, compared to $29 million during the fourth quarter of 2015. Net servicing asset valuation adjustments were positive $23 million and negative $9 million in the fourth and third quarters of 2016, respectively, and positive $3$13 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.2015.

Wealth and asset management revenue of $100 million decreased $1 million from the previous quarter and decreased $2 million from the fourth quarter of 2015. The decline from the third quarter of 2016 was due to a decrease in private client service fees. The year-over-year decrease was due to a decrease in securities and brokerage fees.

Card and processing revenue of $76$79 million increased $1 millionwas flat compared to the third quarter of 20142016 and $5increased $2 million fromcompared to the fourth quarter of 2013.2015. The increasesincrease from both periods werethe prior year was driven by higher transaction volumes and an increase in the number of actively used cards.cards and an increase in customer spend volume.

Other noninterest income of $150$137 million increased $117decreased $199 million compared to the third quarter of 20142016 and decreased $20$465 million from the fourth quarter of 2013.2015. Fourth quarter 2014of 2016 results included a $56gain of $9 million positive valuation adjustment on the exercise of the remaining warrant in Vantiv Holding, LLC warrant and $23a $33 million in gainsgain pursuant to Fifth Third’s tax receivable agreementTRA with Vantiv, Inc. Third quarter of 2016 results included a $280 million gain from the termination and settlement of certain gross cash flows from the existing Vantiv, Inc. TRA and the expected obligation to terminate and settle certain remaining Vantiv, Inc. TRA cash flows upon the exercise of put or call options and a gain of $11 million on the sale-leaseback of an office complex, partially offset by $28 million in losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment and the recognition of $9 million of OTTI on certain private equity investments. Fourth quarter 2015 results included a $331 million gain on the sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares, an $89 million gain on both the sale and exercise of a portion of the warrant associated with Vantiv, Holding, LLC. This comparesLLC, a $49 million gain from a payment received from Vantiv, Inc. to terminate a portion of the TRA and a $31 million gain pursuant to Fifth Third’s TRA with Vantiv, Inc. Fourth quarter of 2015 also included a $53positive warrant valuation adjustment of $21 million compared to a negative warrant valuation adjustment inof $2 million during the third quarter of 2014, and a $91 million positive warrant valuation adjustment in the fourth quarter of 2013 as well as $9 million in gains pursuant to Fifth Third’s tax receivable agreement with Vantiv Holding, LLC, recognized in the fourth quarter of 2013.2016. Quarterly results also included charges related tovaluation adjustments on the valuation of theVisa total return swap entered into as partwhich was a benefit of the 2009 sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares. Negative valuation adjustments on this swap were $19 million, $3 million and $18$6 million in the fourth quarter of 2014,2016 and a charge of $12 million and $10 million in the third quarter of 20142016 and the fourth quarter of 2013,2015, respectively.

The net gainslosses on investment securities were $4$3 million in the fourth quarter of 2014, $32016 compared to net gains of $4 million in the third quarter of 20142016 and $2$1 million in the fourth quarter of 2013.2015.

Noninterest expense of $918$960 million increased $30decreased $13 million from the previous quarter and decreased $71$3 million from the fourth quarter of 2013.2015. The increasedecrease in noninterest expense compared to the third quarter of 20142016 was driven by an increaselower technology and communications expense and seasonally lower marketing expense. The decrease in personnel costs, an increase in provisionnoninterest expense from the reservefourth quarter of 2015 was primarily due to lower card and processing expense due to the impact of renegotiated service contracts and lower net occupancy expense due to a decrease in rent expense driven by a reduction in the number of full-service banking centers and ATM locations, partially offset by higher personnel costs.

        The ALLL as a percentage of portfolio loans and leases was 1.36% as of December 31, 2016, compared to 1.37% as of both September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The provision for unfunded commitmentsloan and an increase in operationallease losses was $54 million in the fourth quarter of 2014. The decrease2016 compared to $80 million in noninterest expensethe third quarter of 2016 and $91 million in the fourth quarter of 2015. Net charge-offs were $73 million in the fourth quarter of 2016, or 31 bps of average portfolio loans and leases on an annualized basis, compared with net charge-offs of $107 million in the third quarter of 2016 and $80 million in the fourth quarter of 2015.

 

 

5058  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

from the fourth quarter of 2013 was primarily due to $69 million in charges to litigation reserves in the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to a $3 million reversal of litigation reserves in the fourth quarter of 2014, partially offset by an increase incredit-related costs in the fourth quarter of 2014.

The ALLL as a percentage of portfolio loans and leases was 1.47% as of December 31, 2014, compared to 1.56% as of September 30, 2014 and 1.79% as of December 31, 2013. Net

charge-offs were $191 million in the fourth quarter of 2014, or 83 bps of average loans on an annualized basis, compared with net charge-offs of $115 million in the third quarter of 2014 and $148 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Bancorp transferred certain residential mortgage loans from the portfolio to held for sale resulting in a charge-off of $87 million.

TABLE 21: QUARTERLY INFORMATION (unaudited)                
TABLE 24: QUARTERLY INFORMATION (unaudited)TABLE 24: QUARTERLY INFORMATION (unaudited) 

 
  2016   2015 
2014 2013   

 

 

   

 

 

 
For the three months ended ($ in millions, except per share data)12/31 9/30 6/30 3/31 12/31 9/30 6/30 3/31             12/31   9/30(b)   6/30(b)   3/31(b)             12/31   9/30   6/30   3/31 

Net interest income(a)

      $ 888   908   905   898   905   898   885   893  

 

Net interest income(a)(b)

   $        909     913     908     909     904     906     892     852  

Provision for loan and lease losses

 99   71   76   69   53   51   64   62     54     80     91     119     91     156     79     69  

Noninterest income

 653   520   736   564   703   721   1,060   743     620     840     599     637     1,104     713     556     630  

Noninterest expense

 918   888   954   950   989   959   1,035   978     960     973     983     986     963     943     947     923  

Net income attributable to Bancorp

 385   340   439   318   402   421   591   422     395     516     328     326     657     381     315     361  

Net income available to common shareholders

 362   328   416   309   383   421   582   413     372     501     305     311     634     366     292     346  

Earnings per share, basic

 0.44   0.39   0.49   0.36   0.44   0.47   0.67   0.47     0.49     0.66     0.40     0.40     0.80     0.46     0.36     0.42  

Earnings per share, diluted

 0.43         0.39         0.49         0.36         0.43         0.47         0.65         0.46     0.49     0.65     0.39     0.40     0.79     0.45     0.36     0.42  

 
(a)

Amounts presented on aan FTE basis. The FTE adjustment was$6and $5 for each period presented during the three monthsyears endedDecember 31, 20142016 and 2015, respectively.

(b)

Net tax deficiencies of$1 million,$5 million and$0 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense atMarch 31, 2016June 30, 2016 andSeptember 30, 2014, June 30, 2014, March 31, 2014, 2016December 31, 2013, September 30, 2013, June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013 was$5., respectively, related to the early adoption of ASU 2016-09 during the fourth quarter of 2016, with an effective date of January 1, 2016.

 

COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED 20132015 WITH 20122014

The Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20132015 was $1.8$1.6 billion, or $2.02$2.01 per diluted share, which was net of $37$75 million in preferred stock dividends. The Bancorp’s net income available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20122014 was $1.5$1.4 billion, or $1.66 per diluted share, which was net of $35$67 million in preferred stock dividends. Overall, credit trends improved in 2013, and as a result, theThe provision for loan and lease losses increased to $396 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $315 million during the year ended December 31, 2014 as the result of the restructuring of a student loan backed commercial credit originated in 2007, a broadening global economic slowdown, stress on capital markets and the prolonged softness in commodity prices. Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreased to $229 million in 20130.48% during 2014 compared to $303 million in 2012.0.64% during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Net interest income on an FTE basis (non-GAAP) was $3.6 billion for both of the years ended December 31, 20132015 and 2012. Net2014. For the year ended December 31, 2015, net interest income was negatively impacted by a decline of 36 bpsdecrease in yields onthe net interest rate spread, changes made to the Bancorp’s interest-earning assets,deposit advance product beginning January 1, 2015 and an increase in average long-term debt of $1.8 billion compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. These negative impacts were partially offset by a $4.3 billion increaseincreases in average taxable securities and average loans and leases due primarilyof $5.2 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to increases in average commercial and industrial loans and average residential mortgage loans. In addition, interest expense decreased primarily due to a decrease in rates paid on average long-term debt and a reduction in higher cost average long-term debt.the year ended December 31, 2014.

Noninterest income increased $228$530 million or eight percent, in 2013during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 2012. The increase from 2012 wasthe year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to increases in other noninterest income and mortgage banking net revenue, partially offset by decreasesa decrease in mortgagecorporate banking net revenue. Other noninterest income increased $305$529 million compared to 2012, primarilythe year ended December 31, 2014. The increase included the impact of a gain of $331 million on the sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares in the fourth quarter of 2015, compared to a gain of $125 million during the second quarter of 2014. Other noninterest income also increased for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 2014 due to positive valuation adjustments on the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC. In addition,LLC of $236 million during 2015 compared to positive valuation adjustments of $31 million during 2014. During the fourth quarter

of 2015, the Bancorp recognized gainsa gain of $242 million and $85$89 million on both the sale and exercise of a portion of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC. Additionally, the Bancorp recognized a gain of $49 million from the payment from Vantiv, Inc. shares into terminate a portion of the secondTRA and third quartersalso recognized a gain of 2013, respectively, compared to gains of $115$31 million related toassociated with the Vantiv, Inc. IPO recorded in the first quarter of 2012 and a $157 million gain on the sale of Vantiv sharesannual TRA payment during the fourth quarter of 2012.2015. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $23 million associated with the TRA during the fourth quarter of 2014. Mortgage banking net revenue decreased $145increased $38 million for the year ended December 31, 20132015 compared to 20122014 primarily due to increases in net mortgage servicing revenue and origination fees and gains on loan sales. Corporate banking revenue decreased $46 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily driven by decreases in syndication fees and lease remarketing fees.

Noninterest expense increased $66 million during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to increases in total personnel costs, technology and communications expense and card and processing expense partially offset by a decrease in other noninterest expense. Personnel costs increased $65 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 driven by higher executive retirement and severance costs as well as an increase in base compensation and an increase in incentive compensation, primarily in the mortgage business. Technology and communications expense increased $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 driven primarily by increased investment in information technology associated with regulatory and compliance initiatives, system maintenance, and other growth initiatives. Card and processing expense increased $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 driven primarily by increased fraud prevention related expenses. Other noninterest expense decreased $34 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily due to a decrease in origination feeslosses and gains on loan salesadjustments partially offset by an increase in positive net valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights and free-standing derivatives entered into to economically hedge the MSR portfolio.

Noninterest expense decreased $120 million, or three percent, in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a decrease in other noninterest expense driven by a decrease in debt extinguishment

costs and a decreaseincreases in the provision for representationthe reserve for unfunded commitments, marketing expense, donations expense, impairment on affordable housing investments, FDIC insurance and warranty claims partially offset by an increase in litigationother taxes and operating lease expense.

Net charge-offs as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases decreased to 0.58% during 2013 compared to 0.85% during 2012 largely due to improved credit trends across all commercial and consumer loan types.

The Bancorp took a number of actions that impacted its capital position in 2013. In March of 2013, the Bancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the FRB as part of the 2013 CCAR. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning April 1, 2013 and ending March 31, 2014: the potential increase in its quarterly common stock dividend to $0.12 per share; the potential repurchase of up to $750 million in TruPS, subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of TierII-qualifying subordinated debt; the potential conversion of the $398 million in outstanding Series G 8.5% convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders and the repurchase of an equivalent amount of common shares issued in the conversion up to $550 million in market value, and the issuance of $550 million in preferred shares; the potential repurchase of common shares in an amount up to $984 million, including any shares issued in a Series G preferred stock conversion; incremental repurchase of common shares in the amount of any after-tax gains from the sale of Vantiv, Inc stock and the potential issuance of an additional $500 million in preferred stock. Actions consistent with these proposed capital actions were substantially completed in 2013.

The FRB launched the 2014 stress testing program and CCAR on November 1, 2013. The stress testing results and capital plan were submitted by the Bancorp to the FRB on January 6, 2014.

Additionally, the Bancorp entered into a number of accelerated share repurchase transactions in 2013. Refer to Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the accelerated share repurchase transactions.

 

 

51  Fifth Third Bancorp

59  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS

 

Loans and Leases

The Bancorp classifies its commercial loans and leases based upon thetheir primary purpose of the loanand consumer loans and leases based upon

product or lease.collateral. Table 2225 summarizes end of period loans and leases, including loans held for sale and Table 23

26 summarizes average total loans and leases, including loans held for sale.

 

 

TABLE 22: COMPONENTS OF TOTAL LOANS AND LEASES (INCLUDES HELD FOR SALE) 
TABLE 25: COMPONENTS OF TOTAL LOANS AND LEASES (INCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE)TABLE 25: COMPONENTS OF TOTAL LOANS AND LEASES (INCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE) 

 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)2014     2013     2012     2011     2010           2016       2015       2014       2013       2012         

Commercial:

 

Commercial loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

$      40,801            39,347            36,077            30,828            27,275       $        41,736    42,151    40,801    39,347    36,077     

Commercial mortgage loans

 7,410  8,069  9,116  10,214  10,992        6,904    6,991    7,410    8,069    9,116     

Commercial construction loans

 2,071  1,041  707  1,037  2,111        3,903    3,214    2,071    1,041    707     

Commercial leases

 3,721  3,626  3,549  3,531  3,378        3,974    3,854    3,721    3,626    3,549     

Subtotal – commercial

 54,003  52,083  49,449  45,610  43,756     

Consumer:

 

Total commercial loans and leases

   56,517    56,210    54,003    52,083    49,449     

 

Consumer loans and leases:

          

Residential mortgage loans

 13,582  13,570  14,873  13,474  10,857        15,737    14,424    13,582    13,570    14,873     

Home equity

 8,886  9,246  10,018  10,719  11,513        7,695    8,336    8,886    9,246    10,018     

Automobile loans

 12,037  11,984  11,972  11,827  10,983        9,983    11,497    12,037    11,984    11,972     

Credit card

 2,401  2,294  2,097  1,978  1,896        2,237    2,360    2,401    2,294    2,097     

Other consumer loans and leases

 436  381  312  364  702        680    658    436    381    312     

Subtotal – consumer

 37,342  37,475  39,272  38,362  35,951     

 

Total consumer loans and leases

   36,332    37,275    37,342    37,475    39,272     

 

Total loans and leases

$91,345  89,558  88,721  83,972  79,707       $92,849    93,485    91,345    89,558    88,721     

Total portfolio loans and leases (excludes loans held for sale)

$90,084  88,614  85,782  81,018  77,491     

 

Total portfolio loans and leases (excluding loans held for sale)

  $92,098    92,582    90,084    88,614    85,782     

 

 

Loans and leases, including loans held for sale, increased $1.8 billion,decreased $636 million, or two percent,1%, from December 31, 2013.2015. The increase in loans and leasesdecrease from December 31, 20132015 was the result of a $1.9 billion,$943 million, or four percent, increase3%, decrease in commercialconsumer loans and leases, partially offset by a $133$307 million, decreaseor 1%, increase in consumercommercial loans and leases.

Commercial loans and leases increased from December 31, 2013 primarily due to increases in commercial and industrial loans and commercial construction loans partially offset by a decrease in commercial mortgage loans. Commercial and industrial loans increased $1.5 billion, or four percent, from December 31, 2013 and commercial construction loans increased $1.0 billion, or 99%, from December 31, 2013 primarily driven by an increase in new loan

origination activity and utilization resulting from a strengthening economy and targeted marketing efforts. Commercial mortgage loans decreased $659 million, or eight percent, from December 31, 2013 due to continued run-off as the level of new originations was outpaced by increased repayments on the current portfolio.

Consumer loans and leases decreased from December 31, 20132015 primarily due to a decreasedecreases in automobile loans, home equity and credit card, partially offset by an increase in credit cardresidential mortgage loans. Home equityAutomobile loans decreased $360 million,$1.5 billion, or four percent,13%, from December 31, 20132015 and home equity decreased $641 million, or 8%, from December 31, 2015 as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Credit card loans increased $107decreased $123 million, or five percent, from December 31, 2013 primarily due to an increase in average balances per account and an increase in new customer accounts.

TABLE 23: COMPONENTS OF AVERAGE TOTAL LOANS AND LEASES (INCLUDES HELD FOR SALE) 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014     2013     2012     2011     2010         

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial loans

$      41,178            37,770            32,911            28,546            26,334     

Commercial mortgage loans

 7,745  8,481  9,686  10,447  11,585     

Commercial construction loans

 1,492  793  835  1,740  3,066     

Commercial leases

 3,585  3,565  3,502  3,341  3,343     

Subtotal – commercial

 54,000  50,609  46,934  44,074  44,328     

Consumer:

Residential mortgage loans

 13,344  14,428  13,370  11,318  9,868     

Home equity

 9,059  9,554  10,369  11,077  11,996     

Automobile loans

 12,068  12,021  11,849  11,352  10,427     

Credit card

 2,271  2,121  1,960  1,864  1,870     

Other consumer loans and leases

 385  360  340  529  743     

Subtotal – consumer

 37,127  38,484  37,888  36,140  34,904     

Total average loans and leases

$91,127  89,093  84,822  80,214  79,232     

Total average portfolio loans and leases (excludes loans held for sale)

$90,485  86,950  82,733  78,533  77,045     

Average loans and leases, including loans held for sale, increased $2.0 billion, or two percent, from December 31, 2013. The increase from December 31, 2013 was the result of a $3.4 billion, or seven percent, increase in average commercial loans and leases partially offset by a $1.4 billion, or four percent, decrease in average consumer loans and leases.

Average commercial loans and leases increased from December 31, 2013 primarily due to increases in average commercial and industrial loans and average commercial construction loans partially offset by a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans. Average commercial and industrial loans increased $3.4 billion, or nine percent, from December 31, 2013 and average commercial construction loans increased $699

52  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

million, or 88%5%, from December 31, 20132015 primarily due to an increasethe sale of the agent bankcard loan portfolio during the second quarter of 2016 and a decrease in new loan origination activity and utilization resulting from a strengthening economy and targeted marketing efforts. Average commercialthe average balance per active customer. Residential mortgage loans decreased $736 million,increased $1.3 billion, or nine percent,9%, from December 31, 2013 due to continued run-off as the level of new originations was outpaced by increased repayments on the current portfolio.

Average consumer loans and leases decreased from December 31, 20132015 primarily due to decreases in average residential mortgage loans and average home equity partially offset by an increase in average credit card loans. Average residential mortgage loans decreased $1.1 billion, or eight percent, from December 31, 2013 primarily due to a decline in average loans held for sale of $1.5

billion from reduced origination volumes driven by a reduction in refinance activity and the exit of the broker origination channel during 2014. This decrease was partially offset by the continued retention of certain shorter term residential mortgage loans originated through the Bancorp’s retail branches and the decision to retain certainagency conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans originated during the year ended December 31, 2014. 2016.

Commercial loans and leases increased from December 31, 2015 primarily due to increases in commercial construction loans and commercial leases, partially offset by decreases in commercial and industrial loans and commercial mortgage loans. Commercial construction loans increased $689 million, or 21%, from December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of increased demand and draw levels continuing to outpace attrition. Commercial leases increased $120 million, or 3%, from December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in syndication and participation origination activity. Commercial and industrial loans decreased $415 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of a decline in new origination activity due to increased competition and an increase in attrition from deliberate credit exits in the second half of the year. Commercial mortgage loans decreased $87 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2015 primarily due to a decline in new loan origination activity driven by increased competition and an increase in paydowns.

TABLE 26: COMPONENTS OF TOTAL AVERAGE LOANS AND LEASES (INCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE) 

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  2016       2015     2014     2013     2012       

 

 

Commercial loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

  $        43,184    42,594    41,178    37,770    32,911     

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,899    7,121    7,745    8,481    9,686     

Commercial construction loans

   3,648    2,717    1,492    793    835     

Commercial leases

   3,916    3,796    3,585    3,565    3,502     

 

 

Total average commercial loans and leases

   57,647    56,228    54,000    50,609    46,934     

 

 

Consumer loans and leases:

          

Residential mortgage loans

   15,101    13,798    13,344    14,428    13,370     

Home equity

   7,998    8,592    9,059    9,554    10,369     

Automobile loans

   10,708    11,847    12,068    12,021    11,849     

Credit card

   2,205    2,303    2,271    2,121    1,960     

Other consumer loans and leases

   661    571    385    360    340     

 

 

Total average consumer loans and leases

   36,673    37,111    37,127    38,484    37,888     

 

 

Total average loans and leases

  $94,320    93,339    91,127    89,093    84,822     

 

 

Total average portfolio loans and leases (excluding loans held for sale)

  $93,426    92,423    90,485    86,950    82,733     

 

 

Average loans and leases, including loans held for sale, increased $981 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2015 as a result of a $1.4

billion, or 3%, increase in average commercial loans and leases, partially offset by a $438 million, or 1%, decrease in average consumer loans and leases.

60  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Average commercial loans and leases increased from December 31, 2015 primarily due to increases in average commercial construction loans, average commercial and industrial loans and average commercial leases, partially offset by a decrease in average commercial mortgage loans. Average commercial construction loans increased $931 million, or 34%, from December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of increased demand and draw levels continuing to outpace attrition. Average commercial and industrial loans increased $590 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in new origination activity resulting from an increase in demand and line utilization in the first half of the year. Average commercial leases increased $120 million, or 3%, from December 31, 2015 primarily as a result of an increase in syndication and participation origination activity. Average commercial mortgage loans decreased $222 million, or 3%, from December 31, 2015 primarily due to a decline in new loan origination activity driven by increased competition and an increase in paydowns.

Average consumer loans and leases decreased from December 31, 2015 primarily due to decreases in average automobile loans, average home equity and average credit card, partially offset by an increase in average residential mortgage loans. Average automobile loans decreased $1.1 billion, or 10%, from December 31, 2015 and average home equity decreased $495$594 million, or five percent,7%, from December 31, 20132015 as payoffs exceeded new loan production. Average credit card decreased $98 million, or 4%, primarily due to the sale of the agent bankcard loan portfolio during the second quarter of 2016 and a decrease in average balance per active customer. Average residential mortgage loans increased $150 million,$1.3 billion, or seven percent,9%, from December 31, 20132015 primarily due to an increase in open and active accounts driven by the volumecontinued retention of new customer accounts.certain agency conforming ARMs and certain other fixed-rate loans.

 

 

Investment Securities

The Bancorp uses investment securities as a means of managing interest rate risk, providing liquidity support and providing collateral for pledging purposes. As of December 31, 2014, totalTotal investment securities were $23.0$31.6 billion compared to $19.1and $29.5 billion at December 31, 2013.2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The taxable investment securities portfolio had an effective duration of 4.9 years at December 31, 2016 compared to 5.1 years at December 31, 2015.

Securities are classified as available-for-sale when, in management’s judgment, they may be sold in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in market conditions. Securities that management has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are

classified as held-to-maturity and reported at amortized cost. Securities are classified as trading when bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. At December 31, 2016, the Bancorp’s investment portfolio consisted primarily of AAA-rated available-for-sale securities. Securities classified as below investment grade were immaterial at both December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Bancorp’s management has evaluated the securities in an unrealized loss position in the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios for OTTI. Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Bancorp’s methodology for both classifying investment securities and management’s evaluation of securities in an unrealized loss position for OTTI.

At December 31, 2014, the Bancorp’s investment portfolio consisted primarily of AAA-rated available-for-sale securities.

The Bancorp did not hold asset-backed securities backed by subprime mortgage loans in its investment portfolio. Additionally, securities

classified as below investment grade were immaterial as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. The Bancorp’s management has evaluated the securities in an unrealized loss position in the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios for OTTI. The Bancorp recognized $24 million, $74 million and $58 millionfollowing table provides a summary of OTTI on its available-for-sale and other debt securities, included in securities gains, net and securities gains, net – non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights, in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Statements of Income during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Bancorp did not recognize OTTI on any of its available-for-sale equity securities or held-to-maturity debt securitiesby security type for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.31:

 

TABLE 24: COMPONENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES     
As of December 31 ($ in millions)2014     2013     2012     2011     2010         

Available-for-sale and other: (amortized cost basis)

  U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

$1,545  1,549  1,771  1,953  1,789     

  Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 185  187  203  96  170     

  Mortgage-backed securities:

    Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 11,968  12,294  8,403  9,743  10,570     

    Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 4,465  -  -  -  -     

    Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 -  -  -  28  41     

    Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 1,489  1,368  1,089  498  -     

  Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 1,324  2,146  2,072  1,266  1,297     

  Equity securities(a)

 701  865  1,033  1,030  1,052     

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$      21,677          18,409          14,571          14,614          14,919     

Held-to-maturity: (amortized cost basis)

  Obligations of states and political subdivisions

$186  207  282  320  348     

  Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 1  1  2  2  5     

Total held-to-maturity

$187  208  284  322  353     

Trading: (fair value)

  U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

$14  5  7  -  1     

  Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 8  13  17  9  21     

  Mortgage-backed securities:

    Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 9  3  7  11  8     

    Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 -  -  -  1  -     

  Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 13  7  15  12  120     

  Equity securities

 316  315  161  144  144     

Total trading

$360  343  207  177  294     
TABLE 27: COMPONENTS OF OTTI BY SECURITY TYPE 

 

 
($ in millions)  2016     2015     2014       

 

 

Available-for-sale and other debt securities

  $            (15)                (5)                (24)     

Available-for-sale equity securities

   (1)    -    -     

 

 

Total OTTI(a)

  $(16)    (5)    (24)     

 

 
(a)

Included in securities gains, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

61  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table summarizes the end of period components of investment securities:

TABLE 28: COMPONENTS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES                    

 

 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)  2016   2015   2014   2013   2012   

 

 

Available-for-sale and other securities (amortized cost basis):

          

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  $547    1,155    1,545    1,549    1,771   

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

   44    50    185    187    203   

Mortgage-backed securities:

          

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities(a)

   15,525    14,811    11,968    12,294    8,403   

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   9,029    7,795    4,465    -    -   

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   3,076    2,801    1,489    1,368    1,089   

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   2,106    1,363    1,324    2,146    2,072   

Equity securities(b)

   697    703    701    865    1,033   

 

 

Total available-for-sale and other securities

  $       31,024    28,678    21,677    18,409    14,571   

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities (amortized cost basis):

          

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  $24    68    186    207    282   

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   2    2    1    1    2   

 

 

Total held-to-maturity securities

  $26    70    187    208    284   

 

 

Trading securities (fair value):

          

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  $23    19    14    5    7   

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

   39    9    8    13    17   

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

   8    6    9    3    7   

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   15    19    13    7    15   

Equity securities

   325    333    316    315    161   

 

 

Total trading securities

  $410    386    360    343    207   

 

 
(a)

Includes interest-only mortgage-backed securities recorded at fair value with fair value changes recorded in securities gains, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Equity securities consist of FHLB, FRB and FRBDTCC restricted stock holdings that are carried at par,cost, FHLMC and FNMA preferred stock holdings and certain mutual fund holdings and equity security holdings.

 

As of December 31, 2014,On an amortized cost basis, available-for-sale and other securities on an amortized cost basis increased $3.3$2.3 billion, or 18%8%, from December 31, 20132015 primarily due to an increaseincreases in agency residential and agency commercial mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities and other debt securities, partially offset by a decrease in asset-backed securitiesU.S. Treasury and other debtfederal agencies securities. Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities increased $4.5 billion from December 31, 2013 due to $4.7 billion in purchases of agency

commercial mortgage-backed securities partially offset by $196 million in sales and $20 million in paydowns on the portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2014. Asset-backed securities and other debt securities decreased $822 million, or 38%, due primarily to sales of $1.1 billion of asset-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations and corporate bonds and paydowns on the portfolio of

53  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

$45 million partially offset by the purchase of $297 million of asset-backed securities during the year ended December 31, 2014.

On an amortized cost basis, available-for-sale and other securities were 18%24% and 16%23% of total interest-earning assets at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,December 31, 2015, respectively. The estimated weighted-average life of the debt securities in the available-for-sale and other securities portfolio was 5.8 years at December 31, 2014, compared to 6.7 years at December 31, 2013.2016 compared to 6.4 years at December 31, 2015. In addition, at both December 31, 2014,2016 and 2015 the available-for-sale and other securities portfolio had a weighted-average yield of 3.31%, compared to 3.39% at December 31, 2013.3.19%.

Information presented in Table 2529 is on a weighted-average life basis, anticipating future prepayments. Yield information is

presented on aan FTE basis and is computed using historicalamortized cost balances. Maturity and yield calculations for the totalavailable-for-sale and other securities portfolio exclude equity securities that have no stated yield or maturity. Total net unrealized gains on the available-for-sale and other securities portfolio were $731$159 million at December 31, 2014,2016 compared to $188$366 million at December 31, 2013.2015. The increasedecrease from December 31, 20132015 was primarily due to a decreasean increase in interest rates during the year ended December 31, 2014.2016. The fair value of investment securities is impacted by interest rates, credit spreads, market volatility and liquidity conditions. The fair value of investment securities generally increases when interest rates decrease or when credit spreads contract.

 

 

TABLE 25: CHARACTERISTICS OF AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND OTHER SECURITIES 
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)Amortized Cost         Fair Value 

        Weighted-Average

        Life (in years)    

 

    Weighted-Average  

    Yield            

 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies:

 Average life 1 – 5 years

$        1,545           1,632      2.0            3.62 %        

Total

 1,545           1,632      2.0            3.62           

Obligations of states and political subdivisions:(a)

 Average life of one year or less

 39           39      0.4            0.03           

 Average life 1 – 5 years

 111           115      2.9            3.72           

 Average life 5 – 10 years

 30           32      7.9            3.67           

 Average life greater than 10 years

 5           6      10.3            3.78           

Total

 185           192      3.4            2.93           

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities:

 Average life of one year or less

 42           43      0.4            5.61           

 Average life 1 – 5 years

 3,224           3,361      4.1            3.80           

 Average life 5 – 10 years

 8,386           8,665      5.9            3.33           

 Average life greater than 10 years

 316           335      12.9            3.83           

Total

 11,968           12,404      5.6            3.47           

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities:

 Average life of one year or less

 15            15      0.3            -           

 Average life 1 – 5 years

 865           874      4.4            2.83           

 Average life 5 – 10 years

 3,350           3,427      7.7            3.13           

 Average life greater than 10 years

 235           249      13.6            3.90           

Total

 4,465           4,565      7.3            3.10           

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities:

 Average life of one year or less

 54           54      0.5            2.19           

 Average life 1 – 5 years

 561           576      2.3            2.69           

 Average life 5 – 10 years

 874           920      7.9            3.67           

Total

 1,489           1,550      5.5            3.25           

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities:

 Average life of one year or less

 97           102      0.2            2.05           

 Average life 1 – 5 years

 514           524      3.1            2.76           

 Average life 5 – 10 years

 244           253      6.9            1.90           

 Average life greater than 10 years

 469           483      14.5            1.91           

Total

 1,324           1,362      7.6            2.25           

Equity securities

 701           703     

Total available-for-sale and other securities

$21,677           22,408      5.8            3.31 %        

62  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

TABLE 29: CHARACTERISTICS OF AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND OTHER SECURITIES 

 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  Amortized Cost   Fair Value   Weighted-Average
Life (in years)
   Weighted-Average
Yield
 

 

 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities:

 

Average life of 1 year or less

  $75              76          0.2                4.39 %         

Average life 1 – 5 years

   177              177          4.6                1.82             

Average life 5 – 10 years

   295              296          5.3                2.11             

 

 

Total

  $547              549          4.4                2.33 %         

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities:(a)

        

Average life of 1 year or less

   -              -          0.4                5.76             

Average life 1 – 5 years

   9              9          1.4                0.10             

Average life 5 – 10 years

   35              36          6.3                3.93             

 

 

Total

  $44              45          5.2                3.15 %         

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities:

        

Average life of 1 year or less

   45              46          0.8                3.93             

Average life 1 – 5 years

   4,485              4,549          4.1                3.10             

Average life 5 – 10 years

           10,282              10,301          6.8                3.36             

Average life greater than 10 years

   713              712          11.5                3.19             

 

 

Total

  $15,525              15,608          6.2                3.28 %         

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities:

        

Average life of 1 year or less

   17              17          0.7                3.08             

Average life 1 – 5 years

   2,104              2,089          3.5                2.89             

Average life 5 – 10 years

   6,432              6,482          7.5                3.21             

Average life greater than 10 years

   476              467          11.0                2.97             

 

 

Total

  $9,029              9,055          6.8                3.12 %         

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities:

        

Average life of 1 year or less

   121              122          0.6                2.27             

Average life 1 – 5 years

   239              245          3.3                3.35             

Average life 5 – 10 years

   2,716              2,745          7.6                3.26             

 

 

Total

  $3,076              3,112          7.0                3.23 %         

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities:

        

Average life of 1 year or less

   88              89          0.5                3.51             

Average life 1 – 5 years

   525              529          2.8                3.34             

Average life 5 – 10 years

   309              311          8.1                2.57             

Average life greater than 10 years

   1,184              1,187          15.4                2.70             

 

 

Total

  $2,106              2,116          10.6                2.87 %         

Equity securities

   697              698           

 

 

Total available-for-sale and other securities

  $31,024              31,183          6.7                3.19 %         

 

 
(a)

Taxable-equivalent yield adjustments included in the above table are 0.00%, 0.01%, 0.00%, 1.94%, 2.01%2.14% and 0.371.68% for securities with an average life of one1 year or less, 1-5 years, 5-10 years, greater than 10 years and in total, respectively.

 

Deposits

The Bancorp’s deposit balances represent an important source of funding and revenue growth opportunity. The Bancorp continues to focus on core deposit growth in its retail and commercial franchises

by improving customer satisfaction, building full relationships and offering competitive rates. Core deposits represented 71% of the Bancorp’s average asset funding base for both of the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015.

 

The following table presents the end of period components of deposits:

 

TABLE 30: COMPONENTS OF DEPOSITS 

 

 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)  2016       2015       2014       2013       2012     

 

 

Demand

  $          35,782    36,267    34,809    32,634    30,023 

Interest checking

   26,679    26,768    26,800    25,875    24,477 

Savings

   13,941    14,601    15,051    17,045    19,879 

Money market

   20,749    18,494    17,083    11,644    6,875 

Foreign office

   426    464    1,114    1,976    885 

 

 

Transaction deposits

   97,577    96,594    94,857    89,174    82,139 

Other time

   3,866    4,019    3,960    3,530    4,015 

 

 

Core deposits

   101,443    100,613    98,817    92,704    86,154 

Certificates $100,000 and over(a)

   2,378    2,592    2,895    6,571    3,284 

Other

   -    -    -    -    79 

 

 

Total deposits

  $103,821    103,205    101,712    99,275    89,517 

 

 
(a)

Includes$1,280, $1,449, $1,483, $1,479 and $1,402 of certificates $250,000 and over atDecember 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

54

Core deposits increased $830 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2015, driven by an increase of $983 million in transaction deposits.

Transaction deposits increased from December 31, 2015 primarily due to an increase in money market deposits, partially offset by decreases in savings deposits and demand deposits.

63  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

TABLE 26: DEPOSITS               
As of December 31 ($ in millions)      2014 2013      2012      2011      2010          

Demand

$34,809  32,634  30,023  27,600  21,413     

Interest checking

 26,800  25,875  24,477  20,392  18,560     

Savings

 15,051  17,045  19,879  21,756  20,903     

Money market

 17,083  11,644  6,875  4,989  5,035     

Foreign office

 1,114  1,976  885  3,250  3,721     

Transaction deposits

 94,857  89,174  82,139  77,987  69,632     

Other time

 3,960  3,530  4,015  4,638  7,728     

Core deposits

 98,817  92,704  86,154  82,625  77,360     

Certificates - $100,000 and over

 2,895  6,571  3,284  3,039  4,287     

Other

 -   -   79  46  1     

Total deposits

$      101,712  99,275  89,517  85,710  81,648     

 

Core deposits increased $6.1 billion, or seven percent, compared to December 31, 2013, driven by an increase of $5.7 billion, or six percent, in transaction deposits and an increase of $430 million, or 12%, in other time deposits. Total transaction deposits increased from December 31, 2013 due to increases in money market deposits, demand deposits and interest checking deposits partially offset by decreases in savings deposits and foreign office deposits. Money market deposits increased $5.4$2.3 billion, or 47%12%, from December 31, 20132015 primarily driven bydue to competitive pricing related to a promotional product offering during 2016 which drove customer acquisition and balance migration from savings deposits which decreased $2.0 billion, or 12%. The remaining increase in money market deposits was due to a promotional product offering and the acquisition of new customers. Demand deposits increased $2.2 billion, or seven percent, from December 31, 2013 primarily due to an increase in commercial customer balances and new commercial customer accounts. Interest

checking2015. Savings deposits increased $925decreased $660 million, or four percent, from December 31, 2013 primarily due to an increase in commercial customer balances and new commercial customer accounts. Foreign office deposits decreased $862 million, or 44%5%, from December 31, 20132015. Demand deposits decreased $485 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2015 primarily due to lower balances per customer account. Other timeInterest checking deposits increased $430included a decrease due to lower balances per account for commercial customers, partially offset by the benefit from a shift from the excess cash in trust accounts managed by Fifth Third to interest checking deposit accounts as a result of the recent enactment of

new money market reform. The increase in core deposits from December 31, 2015 included the impact of the sale of $511 million of deposits as part of the branches sold in the St. Louis MSA and Pittsburgh MSA during 2016.

Certificates $100,000 and over decreased $214 million, or 12%8%, from December 31, 2013 primarily from the acquisition of new customers due to promotional interest rates.

The Bancorp uses certificates $100,000 and over as a method to fund earning assets. At December 31, 2014, certificates $100,000 and over decreased $3.7 billion, or 56%, compared to December 31, 20132015 primarily due to the maturity and run-off of retail and institutional certificates of deposit during the year endedsince December 31, 2014.2015.

 

 

The following table presents the components of average deposits for the years ended December 31:

 

TABLE 27: AVERAGE DEPOSITS               
TABLE 31: COMPONENTS OF AVERAGE DEPOSITS                    

 
($ in millions)      2014 2013      2012      2011      2010            2016       2015       2014       2013         2012         

 

Demand

$31,755  29,925  27,196  23,389  19,669       $35,862    35,164    31,755    29,925        27,196     

Interest checking

 25,382  23,582  23,096  18,707  18,218        25,143    26,160    25,382    23,582        23,096     

Savings

 16,080  18,440  21,393  21,652  19,612        14,346    14,951    16,080    18,440        21,393     

Money market

 14,670  9,467  4,903  5,154  4,808        19,523    18,152    14,670    9,467        4,903     

Foreign office

 1,828  1,501  1,528  3,490  3,355        497    817    1,828    1,501        1,528     

 

Transaction deposits

 89,715  82,915  78,116  72,392  65,662        95,371    95,244    89,715    82,915        78,116     

Other time

 3,762  3,760  4,306  6,260  10,526        4,010    4,051    3,762    3,760        4,306     

 

Core deposits

 93,477  86,675  82,422  78,652  76,188        99,381    99,295    93,477    86,675        82,422     

Certificates - $100,000 and over

 3,929  6,339  3,102  3,656  6,083     

Certificates $100,000 and over(a)

   2,735    2,869    3,929    6,339        3,102     

Other

 -   17  27  7  6        333    57    -    17        27     

 

Total average deposits

$        97,406  93,031  85,551  82,315  82,277       $        102,449    102,221    97,406    93,031        85,551     

 
(a)

Includes$1,310, $1,410, $1,424, $1,283 and $1,678 of average certificates $250,000 and over during the years endedDecember 31, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

On an average basis, core deposits increased $6.8 billion, or eight percent, compared to$86 million from December 31, 20132015 primarily due to an increase of $6.8 billion, or eight percent,$127 million in average transaction deposits. The increase in average transaction deposits was driven by an increaseincreases in average money market deposits and average demand deposits, andpartially offset by decreases in average interest checking deposits, partially offset by a decrease in average savings deposits and average foreign office deposits. Average money market deposits increased $5.2$1.4 billion, or 55%8%, from December 31, 2013 primarily driven by balance migration from savings deposits which decreased $2.4 billion, or 13%. The remaining increase in average money market deposits was due to competitive pricing related to a promotional product offering

an increase in during 2016 which drove customer acquisition and balance migration from average commercial account balances and new customer accounts.savings deposits. Average savings deposits decreased $605 million, or 4%, compared to December 31, 2015. Average demand deposits increased $1.8 billion,$698 million, or six percent,2%, from December 31, 20132015 due to higher average customer balances per commercial customer account. Average

interest checking deposits and average foreign office deposits decreased $1.0 billion, or 4%, and $320 million, or 39%, respectively, from December 31, 2015 primarily due to a decrease in average commercial customer balances per account. The increase in average core deposits from December 31, 2015 included the sale of deposits as part of the St. Louis MSA and Pittsburgh MSA during 2016, which impacted average core deposits by approximately $200 million. Average other deposits increased $276 million from December 31, 2015 primarily due to an increase in average commercial account balances and new commercial customer accounts. Average interest checking deposits increased $1.8 billion, or eight percent from December 31, 2013 primarily due to an increase in average balance per account and new commercial customer accounts.Eurodollar trade deposits. Average certificates $100,000 and over decreased $2.4 billion,$134 million, or 38%5%, from December 31, 20132015 due primarily to the maturity and run-off of retail and institutional certificates of deposit during the year endedsince December 31, 2014.2015.

 

 

55  Fifth Third Bancorp

Contractual Maturities


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The contractual maturities of certificates $100,000 and over as of December 31, 20142016 are summarized in the following table:

 

TABLE 28:32: CONTRACTUAL MATURITIES OF CERTIFICATES $100,000 AND OVER 

 
($ in millions)2014 

Three months or less

$759     

After three months through sixNext 3 months

$203191     

After six months through 123-6 months

 273125    

6-12 months

483     

After 12 months

 1,6601,579     

Total

Total certificates $100,000 and over

$           2,8952,378     

64  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The contractual maturities of other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over as of December 31, 20142016 are summarized in the following table:

 

TABLE 33: CONTRACTUAL MATURITIES OF OTHER TIME DEPOSITS AND CERTIFICATES $100,000 AND OVER        

 

 
($ in millions)        

 

 

Next 12 months

  $           2,173   

13-24 months

   1,601   

25-36 months

   1,181   

37-48 months

   999   

49-60 months

   275   

After 60 months

   15   

 

 

Total other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over

  $6,244   

 

 

Borrowings

The Bancorp accesses a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources. Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term and include federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings. Table 34 summarizes

the end of period components of total borrowings. Total borrowings as a percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities were 21% at both December 31, 2016 and 2015.

The following table summarizes the end of period components of borrowings:

TABLE 34: COMPONENTS OF BORROWINGS                    

 

 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)          2016       2015      2014      2013      2012    

 

 

Federal funds purchased

  $          132    151   144   284   901  

Other short-term borrowings

   3,535    1,507   1,556   1,380   6,280  

Long-term debt

   14,388    15,810 (a)   14,932 (a)   9,605 (a)   7,060 (a)  

 

 

Total borrowings

  $          18,055    17,468   16,632   11,269   14,241  

 

 
(a)
TABLE 29: CONTRACTUAL MATURITIES OF OTHER TIME DEPOSITS AND CERTIFICATES $100,000 AND OVER
($ in millions)

Upon adoption of ASU 2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014,

Next 12 months 2013 and 2012 were adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $34, $36, $28 and $25, respectively, of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

$2,507    

13-24 months

1,617    

25-36 months

961    

37-48 months

626    

49-60 months

884    

After 60 months

260    

Total

$        6,855    

 

Borrowings

Total borrowings increased $5.4 billion,$587 million, or 48%3%, from December 31, 20132015 primarily due to increasesan increase in other short-term borrowings and long-term

debt, partially offset by a decrease in federal funds purchased. Totallong-term debt. Other short-term borrowings as a percentage of interest-bearing liabilities were 20% and 14% atincreased $2.0 billion, from December 31, 20142015 driven by an increase of $2.5 billion in FHLB short-term borrowings partially offset by a $264 million decrease in securities sold under repurchase agreements. The level of other short-term borrowings can fluctuate significantly from period to period depending on funding needs and 2013, respectively.which sources are used to satisfy those needs. For further information on the components of other short-term borrowings, refer to Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Long-term debt decreased

TABLE 30: BORROWINGS               
As of December 31 ($ in millions)  2014 2013   2012 2011  2010      

Federal funds purchased

$144  284  901  346  279     

Other short-term borrowings

 1,556  1,380  6,280  3,239  1,574     

Long-term debt

 14,967  9,633  7,085  9,682  9,558     

Total borrowings

$        16,667  11,297  14,266  13,267  11,411     

Federal funds purchased decreased $140 million,$1.4 billion, or 49%9%, from December 31, 2013 driven by a decrease in excess balances in reserve accounts held at Federal Reserve Banks that the Bancorp purchased from other member banks on an overnight basis. Other short-term borrowings increased $176 million, or 13%, from December 31, 2013 driven by an increase in cash held as collateral related to derivative agreements with various counterparties. Additionally, the utilization of short-term funding remained low in 2014 due to strong deposit growth and to comply with regulatory standards which require greater dependency onlong-term and stable funding.Long-term

debt increased $5.3 billion, or 55%, from December 31, 20132015 primarily driven by the issuancematurity of $2.9$3.5 billion of unsecured senior bank notes, and the issuancematurity of asset-backed securities by consolidated VIEs$250 million of $3.8 billion related to automobile loan securitizations during 2014, partially offset byunsecured subordinated bank notes and $1.4 billion of paydownspay downs on long-term debt associated with automobile loan securitizations. The decrease was partially offset by debt issuances during the year ended December 31, 2016 of $2.8 billion of unsecured senior fixed-rate bank notes, $750 million of unsecured subordinated fixed-rate bank notes, and $250 million of unsecured senior floating-rate bank notes. For additional information regarding automobile securitizations and long-term debt, refer to Note 1011 and Note 16, respectively, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

TABLE 31: AVERAGE BORROWINGS 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  2014 2013      2012      2011        2010            

Federal funds purchased

$458  503  560  345  291     

Other short-term borrowings

 1,873  3,024  4,246  2,777  1,635     

Long-term debt

 12,928  7,914  9,043  10,154  10,902     

Total average borrowings

$        15,259  11,441  13,849  13,276  12,828     

The following table summarizes the components of average borrowings:

TABLE 35: COMPONENTS OF AVERAGE BORROWINGS    

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)          2016       2015      2014      2013      2012    

 

 

Federal funds purchased

  $          506    920   458   503   560  

Other short-term borrowings

   2,845    1,721   1,873   3,024   4,246  

Long-term debt

   15,394            14,644 (a)           12,894 (a)           7,886 (a)           8,991 (a)  

 

 

Total average borrowings

  $          18,745    17,285   15,225   11,413   13,797  

 

 
(a)

Upon adoption of ASU 2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $33, $34, $28 and $52, respectively, of average debt issuance costs from average other assets to average long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Average totalTotal average borrowings increased $3.8$1.5 billion, or 33%8%, compared to December 31, 2013,2015, due to anincreases in average long-term debt and average other short-term borrowings partially offset by a decrease in average federal funds purchased. The increase in average long-term debt partially offset by decreases in average federal funds purchased and average other short-term borrowings. The increase in averagelong-term debt of $5.0 billion,$750 million, or 63%5%, was driven primarily by the issuances of certain long-term debt as discussed above.above in the second and third quarter of 2016, partially offset by certain maturities, as previously mentioned, in the fourth quarter of 2016. The level of average federal funds purchased and average other short-term borrowings can fluctuate significantly from period to period depending on funding needs and which sources

are used to satisfy those needs. Additionally, the utilizationThe increase in average other short-term borrowings, compared to December 31, 2015, of short-term funding remained low in 2014$1.1 billion was primarily due to strong deposit growth and to comply with regulatory standards which require greater dependency onlong-term and stable funding.

an increase in FHLB short-term advances. Information on the average rates paid on borrowings is discussedpresented in the net interest incomeNet Interest Income subsection of the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A. In addition, refer to the Liquidity Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A for a discussion on the role of borrowings in the Bancorp’s liquidity management.

 

 

56

65  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

RISK MANAGEMENT - OVERVIEW

 

Managing risk is an essential component of successfully operating a financial services company. The Bancorp’s risk management approach includes processes for identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. The ERM division, led by the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, ensures the consistency and adequacy of the Bancorp’s risk management approach within the structure of the Bancorp’s affiliate operating model. Management within the lines of business and support functions assess and manage risks associated with their activities and determine if actions need to be taken to strengthen risk management or reduce risk given their risk profile. They are responsible for considering risk when making business decisions and for integrating risk management into business processes. In addition, the Internal Audit division provides an independent assessment of the Bancorp’s internal control structure and related systems and processes.

The assumption of risk requires robust and active risk management practices that comprise an integrated and comprehensive set of activities, measures and strategies that apply to the entire organization. The Bancorp has established a Risk Appetite Framework, approved by the Board, that provides the foundations of corporate risk capacity, risk appetite and risk tolerances. The Bancorp’s risk capacity is represented by its available financial resources. Risk capacity sets an absolute limit on risk-assumption in the Bancorp’s annual and strategic plans. The Bancorp understands that not all financial resources may persist as viable loss buffers over time. Further, consideration must be given to regulatory capital buffers required per Capital Policy Targets that would reduce risk capacity. Those factors take the form of capacity adjustments to arrive at an Operating Risk Capacity which represents the operating risk level the Bancorp can assume while maintaining its solvency standard. The Bancorp’s policy currently discounts its Operating Risk Capacity by a minimum of five percent5% to provide a buffer; as a result, the Bancorp’s risk appetite is limited by policy to, at most, 95% of its Operating Risk Capacity.

Economic capital is the amount of unencumbered financial resources required to support the Bancorp’s risks. The Bancorp measures economic capital under the assumption that it expects to maintain debt ratings at strong investment grade levels over time. The Bancorp’s capital policies require that the Operating Risk Capacity less the aforementioned buffer exceed the calculated economic capital required in its business.

Risk appetite is the aggregate amount of risk the Bancorp is willing to accept in pursuit of its strategic and financial objectives. By establishing boundaries around risk taking and business decisions, and by incorporating the needsexpectations and goals of its shareholders, regulators, rating agencies and customers, the Bancorp’s risk appetite is aligned with its priorities and goals. Risk tolerance is the maximum amount of risk applicable to each of the eight specific risk categories included in its Enterprise Risk Management Framework. This is expressed primarily in qualitative terms.terms; however certain risk types also have quantitative metrics that are used to measure the Bancorp’s level of risk against its risk tolerances. The Bancorp’s risk appetite and risk tolerances are supported by risk targetslimits and key risk limits.indicator thresholds. Those limits and thresholds are used to monitor the amount of risk assumed at a granular level. On a quarterly basis, the Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board reviews performance against key risk limits as well as current assessments of each of the eight risk types relative to the established tolerance. Information supporting these assessments, including policy limits, key risk indicators and qualitative factors, is also reported to the Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board. Any results over limits or outside of tolerance require the development of an action plan that describes actions to be taken to return the measure to within the limit or tolerance.

The risks faced by the Bancorp include, but are not limited to, credit, market, liquidity, operational, regulatory compliance, legal, reputational and strategic. Each of these risks is managed through the Bancorp’s risk program which includes the following key functions:

Enterprise Risk ManagementERM is responsible for developing and overseeing the implementation of risk programs and reporting that facilitate a broad integrated view of risk. The department also leads the continual fostering of a strong risk management culture and the framework, policies and committees that support effective risk governance;

management culture and the framework, policies and committees that support effective risk governance, including the oversight of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance;

Commercial Credit Risk Management is responsible for overseeing the safety and soundness of the commercial and consumer loan portfolio within an independent portfolio management framework that supports the Bancorp’s commercial loan growth strategies and underwriting practices, ensuring portfolio optimization and appropriate risk controls;

Risk Strategies and Reportingcontrols. Treasury is responsible for the economic capital program. Credit Risk Management is responsible for the quantitative analysis neededanalytics to support the consumer and commercial dualportfolio and risk rating methodology,models, ALLL methodology and analytics needed to assess credit risk and develop mitigation strategies related to that risk. The departmentCredit Risk Management also provides oversight, reporting and monitoring of commercial underwriting and credit administration processes. The Risk Strategies and Reporting department is also responsible for the economic capital program and risk management governance and reporting;

Consumer Credit Risk Management is responsible for overseeing the safety and soundness of the consumer portfolio within an independent management framework that supports the Bancorp’s consumer loan growth strategies, ensuring portfolio optimization, appropriate risk controls and oversight, reporting, and monitoring of underwriting and credit administration processes;

Operational Risk Management works with lines of business and affiliatesregional management to maintain processes to monitor and manage all aspects of operational risk, including ensuringvendors and information security to ensure consistency in application of operational risk programs;

Bank Protection oversees and manages fraud prevention and detection and provides investigative and recovery services for the Bancorp;

Capital Markets Risk Management is responsible for instituting, monitoring, and reporting appropriate trading limits within the Capital Markets groups and monitoring liquidity, interest rate risk and risk tolerances within Treasury, Mortgage, and Capital Markets groups and utilizing a value at risk model for Bancorp market risk exposure;resulting from management of Fifth Third’s overall balance sheet;

Regulatory Compliance Risk Management ensuresprovides independent oversight to ensure that an enterprise-wide framework, including processes and procedures, are in place to monitor and comply with federalapplicable laws, regulations, rules and state banking regulations, including processes related to fiduciary, CRAother regulatory requirements; internal policies and procedures; and principles of integrity and fair lending compliance.dealing applicable to the Bancorp’s activities and functions. The function also hasBancorp focuses on managing regulatory compliance risk in accordance with the responsibilityBancorp’s integrated risk management framework, which ensures consistent processes for maintenance of an enterprise-wide compliance framework;identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks; and

The ERM division creates and maintains other functions, committees or processes as are necessary to effectively oversee risk management throughout the Bancorp.

Risk management oversight and governance is provided by the Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors and through multiple management committees whose membership includes a broad cross-section of line-of-business, affiliateregional market and support representatives. The Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors consists of fivesix outside directors and has the responsibility for the oversight of risk management for the Bancorp, as well as for the Bancorp’s overall aggregate risk profile. The Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors has approved the formation of key management governance committees that are responsible for evaluating risks and controls.

66  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The primary committee responsible for the oversight of risk management is the ERMC. Committees accountable to the ERMC, which support the core risk programs, are the Corporate Credit Committee, the Operational Risk Committee, the Management Compliance

57  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Committee, the Asset/Liability Committee and the Enterprise Marketing Committee. Other committees accountable to the ERMC oversee the ALLL, capital, and CRA/fair lending functions. In addition, the Legal and Regulatory Reserve Committee, which is accountable to the Operational Risk Committee, reviews and monitors significant legalmodel risk and regulatory matters to ensure that reserves for potential litigation losses are established when such losses are both probable and subject to reasonable estimation.change management functions. There areis also new products and initiatives processesa risk assessment process applicable to every line of business to ensure an appropriate standard readiness assessment is performed before launching a new or changing product or initiative. Significant risk policies approved by the management governance committees are also reviewed and approved by the Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors.

Credit Risk Review is an independent function responsible for evaluating the sufficiency of underwriting, documentation and approval processes for consumer and commercial credits, the accuracy of risk grades assigned to commercial credit exposure, nonaccrual status, specific reserves and monitoring for charge-offs. Credit Risk Review reports directly to the Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors and administratively to the Chief Auditor.

The Bancorp conducts regular reviews of the business it serves based on the changing competitive and regulatory environment. Based on the most recent review, the Bancorp exited the Residential Wholesale Loan Broker business during the first quarter of 2014.

 

 

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT

The objective of the Bancorp’s credit risk management strategy is to quantify and manage credit risk on an aggregate portfolio basis, as well as to limit the risk of loss resulting from the failure of a borrower or counterparty to honor its financial or contractual obligations to the Bancorp. The Bancorp’s credit risk management strategy is based on three core principles: conservatism, diversification and monitoring. The Bancorp believes that effective credit risk management begins with conservative lending practices. These practices include conservative exposure and counterparty limits and conservative underwriting, documentation and collection standards. The Bancorp’s credit risk management strategy also emphasizes diversification on a geographic, industry and customer level as well as ongoing portfolio monitoring and timely management reviews of large credit exposures and credits experiencing deterioration of credit quality. Credit officers with the authority to extend credit are delegated specific authority amounts, the utilization of which is closely monitored. Underwriting activities

are centrally managed, and ERM manages the policy and the authority

delegation process directly. The Credit Risk Review function provides independent and objective assessments of the quality of underwriting and documentation, the accuracy of risk grades and the charge-off, nonaccrual and reserve analysis process. The Bancorp’s credit review process and overall assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is based on quarterly assessments of the probable estimated losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The Bancorp uses these assessments to promptly identify potential problem loans or leases within the portfolio, maintain an adequate reserveALLL and take any necessary charge-offs. The Bancorp defines potential problem loans and leases as those rated substandard that do not meet the definition of a nonperforming assetnonaccrual loan or a restructured loan. Refer to Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Bancorp’s credit grade categories, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions. In addition, stress testing is performed on various commercial portfolios using the CCAR model and for certain portfolios, such as Real Estate and Leveraged Lending, the stress testing is performed at the individual loan level during credit underwriting.

 

 

The following tables provide a summary of potential problem portfolio loans and leases as of December 31:leases:

 

TABLE 32: POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS AND LEASES         
2014 ($ in millions)Carrying
Value
 Unpaid  
Principal  
Balance  
 Exposure     

Commercial and industrial

$1,022  1,028  1,344  

Commercial mortgage

 272  273  273  

Commercial construction

 7  7  11  

Commercial leases

 29  29  29  

Total

$            1,330  1,337  1,657  
TABLE 33: POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS AND LEASES         
2013 ($ in millions)Carrying
Value
 Unpaid  
Principal  
Balance  
 Exposure     

Commercial and industrial

$1,032  1,034  1,323  

Commercial mortgage

 517  520  520  

Commercial construction

 44  44  50  

Commercial leases

 18  18  18  

Total

$1,611  1,616  1,911  

TABLE 36: POTENTIAL PROBLEM PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES     

 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  

  Carrying

  Value

     Unpaid  
Principal  
Balance  
     Exposure       

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

  $               1,108      1,110      1,807   

Commercial mortgage loans

   102      102      104   

Commercial leases

   22      22      22   

 

 

Total potential problem portfolio loans and leases

  $1,232      1,234      1,933   

 

 

 

58  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

TABLE 37: POTENTIAL PROBLEM PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES     

 

 
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)  

  Carrying

  Value

     Unpaid  
Principal  
Balance  
     Exposure       

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

  $               1,383      1,384      1,922   

Commercial mortgage loans

   170      171      172   

Commercial construction loans

   6      6      7   

Commercial leases

   36      36      39   

 

 

Total potential problem portfolio loans and leases

  $1,595      1,597      2,140   

 

 

 

In addition to the individual review of larger commercial loans that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses, the commercial credit review process includes the use of two risk grading systems. The risk grading system currently utilized for reserveallowance for credit loss analysis purposes encompasses ten categories. The Bancorp also maintains a dual risk rating system for credit approval and pricing, portfolio monitoring and capital allocation that includes a “through-the-cycle” rating philosophy for modeling expected losses.assessing a borrower’s creditworthiness. The dual

risk rating system includes thirteen probabilities of default grade categories and an additional sixeleven grade categories for estimating losses given an event of default. The probability of default and loss given default evaluations are not separated in the ten-category risk rating system. The Bancorp has completed significant validation and testing of the dual risk rating system as a commercial credit risk management tool.

67  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Bancorp is assessing the necessary modifications to the dual risk rating system outputs to develop a U.S. GAAP compliant ALLL model and will make a decision onevaluate the use of modified dual risk ratings for purposes of determining the Bancorp’s ALLL onceas part of the FASB has issued a final standard regarding proposed methodology changes toBancorp’s adoption of ASU 2016-13 “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which will be effective for the determination of credit impairment as outlined in the FASB’s proposed Accounting Standard Update—Financial Instruments–Credit Losses (Subtopic 825-15) issuedBancorp on December 20, 2012.January 1, 2020. Scoring systems, various analytical tools and portfolio performance monitoring are used to assess the credit risk in the Bancorp’s homogenous consumer and small business loan portfolios.

Overview

Economic growth is improvingcontinues to improve as data has been broadly positive. There have been steady gains in the job market and real GDP is expected to maintain its modest expansionary pattern. The job market is slowlyexpand at a moderate pace in 2017. Household spending continues to be the strongest driver of the U.S. economy. Inflation continues to run below the FRB’s stated objective, but steadily improving. Housing prices have largely stabilizedhas increased over the past several months and are increasing in many markets, but overall current economiccould rise further if unemployment continues to fall. Improving global conditions are causing weaker than desired qualified loan demandsupporting U.S. manufacturing activity and a relatively low interest rate environment, which directly impacts the Bancorp’s growth and profitability.

Among consumer portfolios, residential mortgage and brokered home equity portfolios exhibited the most stress. As of December 31, 2014, consumer real estate loans originated from 2005 through 2008 represent approximately 24% of the consumer real estate portfolio and approximately 68% of total losses in 2014. Loss rateshousing prices continue to improve as newer vintages are performing within expectations.increase across the country. With the stabilization of certain real estate markets, the Bancorp beganregard to selectively originate new homebuilder and developer lending and nonowner-occupied commercial lending in the third quarter of 2011. Currently, the level of new commercial real estate, fundings is slightly above the amortizationcredit market has become somewhat more selective even though market data and pay-off of the portfolio. The Bancorp continues to aggressively engage in other loss mitigation strategies such as reducing credit commitments, restructuring certain commercial and consumer loans, as well as utilizing commercial and consumer loan workout teams. For commercial and consumer loans owned by the Bancorp, loan modification strategies are developed that are workable for both the borrower and the Bancorp when the borrower displays a willingness to cooperate. These strategies typically involve either a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the loan’s maturity date(s) with a stated rate lower than the current market rate for a new loan with similar risk, or in limited circumstances, a reduction of the principal balance of the loan or the loan’s accrued interest. For residential mortgage loans serviced for FHLMC and FNMA, the Bancorp participates in the HAMP and HARP 2.0 programs. For loans refinanced under the HARP 2.0 program, the Bancorp strictly adheres to the underwriting requirements of the program and promptly sells the refinanced loan back to the agencies. Loan restructuring under the HAMP program is performed on behalf of FHLMC or FNMA and

the Bancorp does not take possession of these loans during the modification process. Therefore, participation in these programs does not significantly impact the Bancorp’s credit quality statistics. The Bancorp participates in trial modifications in conjunction with the HAMP program for loans it services for FHLMC and FNMA. As these trial modifications relate to loans serviced for others, they are not included in the Bancorp’s TDRs as they are not assets of the Bancorp. In the event there is a representation and warranty violation on loans sold through the programs, the Bancorp may be required to repurchase the sold loan. As of December 31, 2014, repurchased loans restructured or refinanced under these programs were immaterial to the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, $22 million and $111 million, respectively, of loans refinanced under HARP 2.0 were included in loans held for sale in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Bancorp recognized $13 million and $97 million, respectively, of noninterest income in mortgage banking net revenue in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Statements of Income related to the sale of loans restructured or refinanced under the HAMP and HARP 2.0 programs.vacancies remain positive.

In the financial services industry, there has been heightened focus on foreclosure activity and processes. The Bancorp actively works with borrowers experiencing difficulties and has regularly modified or provided forbearance to borrowers where a workable solution could be found. Foreclosure is a last resort, and the Bancorp undertakes foreclosures only when it believes they are necessary and appropriate and is careful to ensure that customer and loan data are accurate.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bancorp settled certain repurchase claims related to mortgage loans originated and sold to FHLMC prior to January 1, 2009 for $25 million, after paid claim credits and other adjustments. The settlement removes the Bancorp’s responsibility to repurchase or indemnify FHLMC for representation and warranty violations on any loan sold prior to January 1, 2009 except in limited circumstances.

Commercial Portfolio

The Bancorp’s credit risk management strategy includes minimizingseeks to minimize concentrations of risk through diversification. The Bancorp has commercial loan concentration limits based on industry, lines of business within the commercial segment, geography and credit product type.

The risk within the commercial loan and lease portfolio is managed and monitored through an underwriting process utilizing detailed origination policies, continuous loan level reviews, monitoring of industry concentration and product type limits and continuous portfolio risk management reporting.

The Bancorp provides loans to a variety of customers ranging from large multi-national firms to middle market businesses, sole

proprietors and high net worth individuals. The origination policies for commercial and industrial loans outline the risks and underwriting requirements for loans to businesses in various industries. Included in the policies are maturity and amortization terms, collateral and leverage requirements, cash flow coverage measures and hold limits. The Bancorp aligns credit and sales teams with specific industry expertise to better monitor and manage different industry segments of the portfolio.

The origination policies for commercial real estate outline the risks and underwriting requirements for owner and nonowner-occupied and construction lending. Included in the policies are maturity and amortization terms, maximum LTVs, minimum debt service coverage ratios, construction loan monitoring procedures, appraisal requirements, pre-leasing requirements (as applicable), sensitivity and pro-forma analysis requirements and interest rate sensitivity. The Bancorp requires a valuation of real estate collateral, which may include third-party appraisals, be performed at the time of origination and renewal in accordance with regulatory requirements and on an as needed basis when market conditions justify. Although the Bancorp does not back test these collateral value assumptions, the Bancorp maintains an appraisal review department to order and review third-party appraisals in accordance with regulatory requirements. Collateral values on criticized assets with relationships exceeding $1 million are reviewed quarterly to assess the appropriateness of the

59  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

value ascribed in the assessment of charge-offs and specific reserves. In addition, the Bancorp applies incremental valuation adjustments to older appraisals that relate to collateral dependent loans, which can currently be up to 20-30% of the appraised value based on the type of collateral. These incremental valuation adjustments generally reflect the age of the most recent appraisal as well as collateral type. Trends in collateral values, such as home price indices and recent asset dispositions, are monitored in order to determine whether changes to the appraisal adjustments are warranted. Other factors

such as local market conditions or location may also be considered as necessary.

The Bancorp assesses all real estate and non-real estate collateral securing a loan and considers all cross collateralizedcross-collateralized loans in the calculation of the LTV ratio. The following tables provide detail on the most recent LTV ratios for commercial mortgage loans greater than $1 million, excluding impaired commercial mortgage loans individually evaluated. The Bancorp does not typically aggregate the LTV ratios for commercial mortgage loans less than $1 million.

 

 

TABLE 34: COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV, LOANS GREATER THAN $1 MILLION 
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)LTV > 100% LTV 80-100% LTV £ 80% 

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

$148          248       1,982    

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 243          333       2,423    

Total

$                391          581       4,405    
TABLE 35: COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV, LOANS GREATER THAN $1 MILLION 
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)LTV > 100% LTV 80-100% LTV £ 80% 

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

$240          345       2,152    

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 274          353       1,798    

Total

$514          698       3,950    

TABLE 38: COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV, LOANS GREATER THAN $1 MILLION     

 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)          LTV > 100%     LTV 80-100%     LTV < 80%     

 

 

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

  $              106        178        1,953       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   22        100        2,598       

 

 

Total

  $128        278        4,551       

 

 
TABLE 39: COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV, LOANS GREATER THAN $1 MILLION 

 

 
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)          LTV > 100%     LTV 80-100%     LTV < 80%     

 

 

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

  $119        216        2,063       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   120        194        2,032       

 

 

Total

  $239        410        4,095       

 

 

 

6068  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following table provides detail on commercial loan and leases by industry classification (as defined by the North American Industry Classification System), by loan size and by state, illustrating the diversity and granularity of the Bancorp’s commercial loans and leases:

 

TABLE 36: COMMERCIAL LOAN AND LEASE PORTFOLIO (EXCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE) 

 

TABLE 40: COMMERCIAL LOAN AND LEASE PORTFOLIO (EXCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE)

TABLE 40: COMMERCIAL LOAN AND LEASE PORTFOLIO (EXCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE)

     
2014 2013 

 
    

 

 

   2016   2015 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)                Outstanding Exposure Nonaccrual             Outstanding Exposure Nonaccrual         Outstanding   Exposure   Nonaccrual           Outstanding   Exposure   Nonaccrual     

 

 

By industry:

By Industry:

              

Manufacturing

  $10,315        20,496  55   $10,299        19,955  55        $      10,070         19,646    50      10,572       20,422    70     

Real estate

   7,206         11,919    26      6,494       10,293    40     

Financial services and insurance

 6,097        13,557  20    5,998        14,010  25        5,648         11,522    2      5,896       13,021    3     

Real estate

 5,392        8,612  32    5,027        7,302  70     

Healthcare

   4,649         6,450    23      4,676       6,879    22     

Business services

 4,644        7,109  79    4,910        7,411  55        4,599         6,996    65      4,471       6,765    96     

Retail trade

   4,048         7,598    6      3,764       7,391    8     

Wholesale trade

 4,314        8,004  62    4,407        8,406  35        3,482         6,249    24      4,082       7,254    23     

Healthcare

 4,133        6,322  20    4,038        6,220  26     

Retail trade

 3,754        7,190  22    3,301        6,673  18     

Transportation and warehousing

 3,012        4,276  1    3,134        4,416  1        3,059         4,473    38      3,111       4,619    1     

Accommodation and food

   3,051         4,817    5      2,507       4,104    6     

Communication and information

 2,409        4,140  3    1,801        3,295  2        2,901         4,726    -      2,913       5,052    2     

Construction

 1,864        3,352  25    1,865        3,196  36        2,025         3,786    3      1,871       3,403    8     

Entertainment and recreation

   1,736         2,979    3      1,210       2,066    4     

Mining

 1,862        3,323  3    1,580        3,206  55        1,312         2,621    246      1,499       2,695    36     

Accommodation and food

 1,712        2,945  9    1,668        2,556  12     

Entertainment and recreation

 1,451        2,321  10    1,149        1,955  12     

Utilities

 1,044        2,551  -     773        2,332  -        1,168         2,799    -      1,217       2,854    -     

Other services

 881        1,207  11    1,013        1,362  24        729         945    24      864       1,188    10     

Public administration

 567        658  -     541        734  -        417         463    -      495       562    -     

Agribusiness

 318        444  11    356        504  26        284         426    2      368       527    4     

Individuals

 170        201  4    174        218  6        66         83    1      139       187    2     

Other

 14        17  -     12        12  -         2         2    5      7       6    6     

 

 

Total

  $            53,953        96,725  367   $            52,046        93,763  458        $      56,452         98,500    523      56,156       99,288    341     

 

 

By loan size:

By Loan Size:

              

Less than $200,000

     1 %         1      6        1 %         1      8        1 %    1    3      1       1    7     

$200,000 to $1 million

     5             3      15        5            4      18        3         3    5      4       3    10     

$1 million to $5 million

     11             9      22        13            10      23        9         7    16      10       8    25     

$5 million to $10 million

     8             7      19        10            8      10        7         6    13      8       7    25     

$10 million to $25 million

     25             22      24        27            23      34        23         20    54      24       21    15     

Greater than $25 million

     50             58      14        44            54      7        57         63    9      53       60    18     

 

 

Total

 100 %     100  100    100 %     100  100        100 %    100    100      100       100    100     

 

 

By state:

By State:

              

Ohio

     17 %         20      11        19 %         22      16        15 %    16    4      16       17    8     

Florida

   8         7    5      8       7    12     

Michigan

     9             8      11        10            8      11        7         7    5      8       7    9     

Illinois

     7             8      6        7            7      8        7         7    9      7       8    20     

Florida

     7             6      17        7            6      19     

Indiana

     5             5      5        5            5      9        4         4    2      5       5    4     

Kentucky

     3             3      2        3            3      2     

North Carolina

     3             4      2        3            3      1        4         4    -      4       4    1     

Tennessee

     3             3      -         3            3      1        3         3    1      3       3    -     

Pennsylvania

     3             2      7        3            3      7        3         3    4      3       3    2     

Kentucky

   3         3    2      3       3    1     

All other states

     43             41      39        40            40      26        46         46    68      43       43    43     

 

 

Total

 100 %     100  100    100 %     100  100        100 %    100    100      100       100    100     

 

 

 

The Bancorp’s non-power producing energy and nonowner-occupied commercial real estate portfolios have been identified by the Bancorp has identified certain categories ofas loans which it believes represent a higher level of risk compared to the rest of the

Bancorp’s commercial loan portfolio due to economic or market conditions within the Bancorp’s key lending areas.

Due to the sensitivity of the non-power producing energy portfolio to downward movements in oil prices, the Bancorp saw a

migration into criticized classifications during 2015 through the second quarter of 2016. However, in the third and fourth quarters of 2016, this portfolio has stabilized with signs of improvement. The reserve-based energy loans that the Bancorp holds are senior secured loans with a borrowing base that is re-determined on a semi-annual basis.

 

 

6169  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following tables provide an analysis of the non-power producing energy loan portfolio:

TABLE 41: NON-POWER PRODUCING ENERGY PORTFOLIO 

 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)                          For the Year Ended
    December 31, 2016    
 

 

   

 

 

 
         Pass     Criticized   Outstanding             Exposure   90 Days
Past Due
       Nonaccrual   Net Charge-offs 

 

 

Reserve-based lending

   $            337      338       675        1,368       -       170        -     

Midstream

   308      -       308        1,001       -       -        -     

Oil field services

   153      74       227        357       -       37        19     

Oil and gas

   17      78       95        475       -       37        3     

Refining

   82      -       82        471       -       -        -     

 

 

Total

   $            897      490       1,387        3,672       -       244        22     

 

 

 

TABLE 42: NON-POWER PRODUCING ENERGY PORTFOLIO

 

 

 
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)                          For the Year Ended
    December 31, 2015    
 

 

   

 

 

 
          Pass     Criticized   Outstanding             Exposure   90 Days
Past Due
     Nonaccrual   Net Charge-offs 

 

 

Reserve-based lending

   $            295      473       768        1,296       -       -        -     

Midstream

   335      -       335        1,029       -       -        -     

Oil field services

   198      88       286        450       -       22        3     

Oil and gas

   69      54       123        523       3       -        -     

Refining

   83      1       84        634       -       -        -     

 

 

Total

   $            980      616       1,596        3,932       3       22        3     

 

 

The following tables provide an analysis of nonowner-occupied commercial real estate loans (excluding loans held for sale):

 

                                                                                                              
TABLE 37: NONOWNER-OCCUPIED COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE(a) 
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)            For the Year Ended 
December 31, 2014 
 
TABLE 43: NONOWNER-OCCUPIED COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (EXCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE)(a)TABLE 43: NONOWNER-OCCUPIED COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (EXCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE)(a) 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)                  For the Year Ended
    December 31, 2016    
 

   

 

 
            Outstanding             Exposure         90 Days
      Past Due
       Nonaccrual   Net Charge-offs
(Recoveries)
 

 
By State:Outstanding Exposure 90 Days
Past Due
 Nonaccrual Net Charge-offs
(Recoveries)
           

Ohio

$1,283          1,685            -     7      (1   $                1,393          1,844       -         4        (2)           

Michigan

 724          797            -     9      8 

Florida

 575          871            -         16      5    947          1,521       -         -        1            

Illinois

 449          964            -     6      2    656          1,226       -         -        1            

Michigan

   574          709       -         1        3            

North Carolina

 369          537            -     -       -     552          788       -         -        -            

Indiana

 250          344            -     -       -     291          508       -         -        -            

All other states

 1,865          3,560            -     19      4    2,822          4,836       -         4        3            

 

Total

$          5,515          8,758            -     57            18    $                7,235          11,432       -         9        6            

(a) Included in commercial mortgage and commercial construction loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

        

 
TABLE 38: NONOWNER-OCCUPIED COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE(a) 
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions) For the Year Ended
December 31, 2013
 
By State:Outstanding Exposure 90 Days
Past Due
 Nonaccrual Net Charge-offs 

Ohio

$1,086            1,377            -     14      12 

Michigan

 851            925            -     17      5 

Florida

 508            629            -     7      3 

Illinois

 353            593            -     6      4 

North Carolina

 248            428            -     2      1 

Indiana

 161            253            -     4      1 

All other states

 1,270            2,173            -     7      1 

Total

$4,477            6,378            -     57            27 
(a)

Included in commercial mortgage loans and commercial construction loans onin the ConsolidatedLoans and Leases subsection of the Balance Sheets.Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

                                                                                                              
TABLE 44: NONOWNER-OCCUPIED COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (EXCLUDING LOANS HELD FOR SALE)(a) 

 

 
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)                  For the Year Ended
    December 31, 2015    
 

 

   

 

 

 
           Outstanding             Exposure         90 Days
      Past Due
         Nonaccrual   Net Charge-offs
(Recoveries)
 

 

 

By State:

          

Ohio

   $                1,334      1,594      -         7        (2)           

Florida

   687      1,041      -         9        2            

Illinois

   650      1,028      -         2        -            

Michigan

   598      722      -         13        7            

North Carolina

   375      669      -         -        (1)           

Indiana

   294      521      -         -        -            

All other states

   2,467      4,383      -         4        11            

 

 

Total

   $                6,405      9,958      -         35        17            

 

 
(a)

Included in commercial mortgage loans and commercial construction loans in the Loans and Leases subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

Consumer Portfolio

Consumer credit risk management utilizes a framework that encompasses consistent processes for identifying, assessing, managing,

monitoring, and reporting credit risk. These processes are supported by a credit risk governance structure that includes Board oversight, policies, risk limits, and risk committees.

The Bancorp’s consumer portfolio is materially comprised of four categories of loans: residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, automobile loans and credit card.

 

6270  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Consumer Portfolio

The Bancorp’s consumer portfolio is materially comprised of three categories of loans: residential mortgage, home equity and automobile. The Bancorp has identified certain categories within these loan typesfour categories of loans which it believes represent a higher level of risk compared to the rest of the consumer loan portfolio due to high loan amount to collateral value. The Bancorp does not update LTV ratios for the consumer portfolio subsequent to origination except as part of the charge-off process for real estate secured loans. Among consumer portfolios, legacy underwritten residential mortgage and brokered home equity portfolios exhibited the most stress during the credit crisis. As of December 31, 2016, consumer real estate loans, consisting of residential mortgage loans and home equity loans, originated from 2005 through 2008 represent approximately 17% of the consumer real estate portfolio. These loans accounted for 54% of total consumer real estate secured losses for the year ended December 31, 2016. Current loss rates in the residential mortgage and home equity portfolios are below pre-crisis levels. In addition to the consumer real estate portfolio, credit risk management continues to closely monitor the automobile portfolio performance. Increased competition in the marketplace has led to industry-wide loosening of underwriting guidelines. Fifth Third actively manages the automobile portfolio through concentration limits, which mitigates credit risk through limiting the exposure to lower FICO scores, higher advance rates and extended term originations.

Residential Mortgage Portfoliomortgage portfolio

The Bancorp manages credit risk in the residential mortgage portfolio through conservative underwriting and documentation standards and geographic and product diversification. The Bancorp may also package and sell loans in the portfolio.

The Bancorp does not originate mortgage loans that permit customers to defer principal payments or make payments that are

less than the accruing interest. The Bancorp originates both fixedfixed-rate and adjustable rate residential mortgageARM loans. Resets of rates on ARMs are not expected to have a material impact on credit costs in the current interest rate environment, as approximately $900$758 million of adjustable rate residential mortgageARM loans will have rate resets during the next twelve months. Approximately three fourths of thoseOf these resets, 98% are expected to experience an increase in rate, with an average increase of approximately an eighthone half of a percent.

Certain residential mortgage products have contractual features that may increase credit exposure to the Bancorp in the event of a decline in housing values. These types of mortgage products offered by the Bancorp include loans with high LTV ratios, multiple loans on the same collateral that when combined result in a LTV greater than 80% and interest-only loans. The Bancorp has deemed residential mortgage loans with greater than 80% LTV ratios and no mortgage insurance as loans that represent a higher level of risk.

Portfolio residential mortgage loans from 2010 and later vintages represented 88% of the portfolio as of December 31, 2016 and had a weighted-average LTV of 71% and a weighted-average origination FICO of 759.

 

 

The following table provides an analysis of the residential mortgage portfolio loans outstanding by LTV at origination:

 

TABLE 39: RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO LOANS BY LTV AT ORIGINATION 
TABLE 45: RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO LOANS BY LTV AT ORIGINATIONTABLE 45: RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO LOANS BY LTV AT ORIGINATION 

 

 
2014 2013  2016 2015 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)Outstanding Weighted
Average LTV
 Outstanding Weighted      
Average LTV      
          Outstanding   Weighted-
    Average LTV    
         Outstanding 

Weighted-

      Average LTV      

 

 

 

LTV£ 80%

$9,220              65.1 % $9,507              65.2 %   $        11,412         65.9 %  $        10,198      65.6 % 

LTV > 80%, with mortgage insurance

 1,206              93.8  1,242              93.7       1,284         93.3       1,300      93.3     

LTV > 80%, no mortgage insurance

 1,963              96.2  1,931              95.9       2,355         95.7       2,218      96.0     

 

 

Total

$        12,389              73.0 % $        12,680              72.7 %   $        15,051         73.2 %  $13,716      73.4 % 

 

 

The following tables provide an analysis of the residential mortgage portfolio loans outstanding with a greater than 80% LTV ratio and no mortgage insurance:

 

TABLE 40: RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO LOANS, LTV GREATER THAN 80%, NO MORTGAGE INSURANCE
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)For the Year Ended  
December 31, 2014  
By State:Outstanding90 Days
Past Due
NonaccrualNet Charge-offs     

Ohio

 $509                 1   10     22 

Illinois

  293                 1   4     3 

Michigan

  265                 1   5     11 

Florida

  247                 1   5     3 

Indiana

  126                 1   2     3 

North Carolina

  100                 1   1     - 

Kentucky

  78                 -   1     2 

All other states

  345                 -   2     2 

Total

 $            1,963                 6   30     46(a)
(a)

Includes $34 in charge-offs related to the transfer of $720 of restructured residential mortgage loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale during the fourth quarter of 2014.

TABLE 46: RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO LOANS, LTV GREATER THAN 80%, NO MORTGAGE INSURANCE     

 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)            For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
 

 

  

 

 

 
   Outstanding  90 Days
Past Due
   Nonaccrual    Net Charge-offs 

 

 

By State:

        

Ohio

  $556            2        4              2   

Illinois

   450            1        1              -   

Florida

   333            1        3              -   

Michigan

   277            -        1              1   

Indiana

   161            -        1              -   

North Carolina

   117            -        1              -   

Kentucky

   91            1        -              -   

All other states

   370            -        -              1   

 

 

Total

  $            2,355            5        11             4   

 

 

 

6371  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

TABLE 41: RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO LOANS, LTV GREATER THAN 80%, NO MORTGAGE INSURANCE
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)      For the Year Ended  
December 31, 2013  
TABLE 47: RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO LOANS, LTV GREATER THAN 80%, NO MORTGAGE INSURANCETABLE 47: RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE PORTFOLIO LOANS, LTV GREATER THAN 80%, NO MORTGAGE INSURANCE 

 
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)               For the Year Ended  
  December 31, 2015  
 

   

 

 
 Outstanding   90 Days
Past Due
        Nonaccrual     Net Charge-offs     

 
By State:Outstanding90 Days
Past Due
NonaccrualNet Charge-offs       

Ohio

 $583                  3    20        10  $                    517                      2        4    3 

Illinois

 236               -  5  2  375                     -        1    1 

Michigan

 305              2  7  5  280                     1        1    2 

Florida

 260              1  11  3  278                     1        4    - 

Indiana

 120              1  4  1  137                     1        1    - 

North Carolina

 94               -  2   -  108                     -        1    - 

Kentucky

 83               -  3  2  84                     1        -    - 

All other states

 250              1  2  1  439                     -        1    - 

 

Total

 $            1,931               8  54  24  $2,218                     6        13      6 

 

 

Home Equity Portfolioequity portfolio

The Bancorp’s home equity portfolio is primarily comprised of home equity lines of credit. Beginning in the first quarter of 2013, the Bancorp’sBancorp���s newly originated home equity lines of credit have a 10-year interest onlyinterest-only draw period followed by a 20-year amortization period. The home equity line of credit previously offered by the Bancorp was a revolving facility with a 20-year term, minimum payments of interest onlyinterest-only and a balloon payment of principal at maturity. Peak maturity years for the balloon home equity lines of credit are 2025 to 2028 and approximately 26% of the balances mature before 2025.

The aging of 2008 and prior vintages of home equity loans has contributed to declining losses over the past twelve months. These vintages represented 68% of the balances at December 31, 2016 and 95% of the losses during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 73% of the balances at December 31, 2015 and 97% of the losses during the year ended December 31, 2015.

The ALLL provides coverage for probable and estimable losses in the home equity portfolio. The allowance attributable to the portion of the home equity portfolio that has not been restructured in a TDR is calculated on a pooled basis with senior lien and junior lien categories segmented in the determination of the probable credit losses in the home equity portfolio. The modeled loss factor for the home equity portfolio is based on the trailing twelve month historical loss rate for each category, as adjusted for certain prescriptive loss rate factors and certain qualitative adjustment factors to reflect risks associated with current conditions and trends. The prescriptive loss rate factors include adjustments for delinquency trends, LTV trends and refreshed FICO score trends and product mix.trends. The qualitative factors include adjustments for credit administrationchanges in policies or procedures in underwriting, monitoring or collections, economic conditions, portfolio mix, lending and portfoliorisk management credit policypersonnel, results of internal audit and underwritingquality control reviews, collateral values and the national and local economy.geographic concentrations. The Bancorp considers home price index trends when determining the national and local economycollateral value qualitative factor.

The home equity portfolio is managed in two primary groups: loans outstanding with a combined LTV greater than 80% and

those loans with a LTV 80% or less based upon appraisals at origination. The carrying value of the greater than 80% LTV home equity loans and 80% or less LTV home equity loans were $3.0$2.4 billion and $5.9$5.3 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2014.2016. Of the total $8.9$7.7 billion of outstanding home equity loans:

  

84%86% reside within the Bancorp’s Midwest footprint of Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, Indiana and Illinois;Illinois as of December 31, 2016;

  

34%36% are in senior lien positions and 66%64% are in junior lien positions at December 31, 2014;2016;

  

Approximately 90%79% of non-delinquent borrowers made at least one payment greater than the minimum payment during the year ended December 31, 2014;2016; and

  

The portfolio had an average refreshed FICO score of 740 and 736743 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.2016.

The Bancorp actively manages lines of credit and makes reductions in lending limits when it believes it is necessary based on FICO score deterioration and property devaluation. The Bancorp does not routinely obtain appraisals on performing loans to update LTV ratios after origination. However, the Bancorp monitors the local housing markets by reviewing various home price indices and incorporates the impact of the changing market conditions in its on-goingongoing credit monitoring processes. For junior lien home equity loans which become 60 days or more past due, the Bancorp tracks the performance of the senior lien loans in which the Bancorp is the servicer and utilizes consumer credit bureau attributes to monitor the status of the senior lien loans that the Bancorp does not service. If the senior lien loan is found to be 120 days or more past due, the junior lien home equity loan is placed on nonaccrual status unless both loans are well-secured and in the process of collection. Additionally, if the junior lien home equity loan becomes 120 days or more past due and the senior lien loan is also 120 days or more past due, the junior lien home equity loan is assessed for charge-off, unless it is well-secured and in the process of collection.charge-off. Refer to the Analysis of Nonperforming Assets subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A for more information.

 

 

6472  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following table provides an analysis of home equity portfolio loans outstanding disaggregated based upon refreshed FICO score as of:score:

 

TABLE 42: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY REFRESHED FICO SCORE 
($ in millions)December 31, 2014 % of
Total
 December 31, 2013 % of
Total
 

Senior Liens:

FICO < 620

$178  2 % $201  2 %   

FICO 621-719

 613  7  638  7 

FICO > 720

 2,257  25  2,253  24 

Total Senior Liens

 3,048  34  3,092  33 

Junior Liens:

FICO < 620

 471  6  565  6 

FICO 621-719

 1,542  17  1,662  18 

FICO > 720

 3,825  43  3,927  43 

Total Junior Liens

 5,838  66  6,154  67 

Total

$8,886  100 % $9,246  100 %   

The Bancorp believes that home equity loans with a greater than 80% combined LTV ratio present a higher level of risk. The following table provides an analysis of the home equity loans outstanding in a senior and junior lien position by LTV at origination:

TABLE 43: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV AT ORIGINATION 
TABLE 48: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY REFRESHED FICO SCORETABLE 48: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY REFRESHED FICO SCORE 

 
 2016 2015 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)         Outstanding         % of Total             Outstanding         % of Total     

 

Senior Liens:

    

FICO£ 659

 $262       3 %  $279      3 % 

FICO 660-719

  424       6       443      6     

FICO³ 720

  2,112       27       2,210      26     

 

Total senior liens

  2,798       36       2,932      35     

Junior Liens:

    

FICO£ 659

  633       8       705      9     

FICO 660-719

  975       13       1,083      13     

FICO³ 720

  3,289       43       3,581      43     

 

Total junior liens

  4,897       64       5,369      65     

 

Total

 $        7,695       100 %  $        8,301      100 % 

 

The Bancorp believes that home equity portfolio loans with a greater than 80% combined LTV ratio present a higher level of risk. The
following table provides an analysis of the home equity portfolio loans outstanding in a senior and junior lien position by LTV at origination:

The Bancorp believes that home equity portfolio loans with a greater than 80% combined LTV ratio present a higher level of risk. The
following table provides an analysis of the home equity portfolio loans outstanding in a senior and junior lien position by LTV at origination:

 

TABLE 49: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV AT ORIGINATION

TABLE 49: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV AT ORIGINATION

 

 

 
2014 2013  2016 2015 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)Outstanding Weighted
  Average LTV  
 Outstanding Weighted
      Average LTV      
          Outstanding Weighted-
        Average LTV        
         Outstanding Weighted-
      Average LTV      
 

 

 

Senior Liens:

    

LTV£ 80%

$            2,635          55.2 % $            2,645          54.9 %   $2,454       55.1 %  $2,557      55.1 % 

LTV > 80%

 413          89.1  447          89.2       344       89.0       375      89.1     

 

 

Total Senior Liens

 3,048          60.0  3,092          60.1     

Total senior liens

  2,798       59.5       2,932      59.7     

Junior Liens:

    

LTV£ 80%

 3,281          67.4  3,353          67.3       2,892       67.6       3,088      67.6     

LTV > 80%

 2,557          91.1  2,801          91.4       2,005       90.7       2,281      90.9     

 

 

Total Junior Liens

 5,838          79.6  6,154          80.2     

Total junior liens

  4,897       78.7       5,369      79.2     

 

 

Total

$8,886          72.4 % $9,246          72.9 %   $        7,695       71.2 %  $        8,301      71.8 % 

 

 

The following tables provide an analysis of home equity portfolio loans by state with a combined LTV greater than 80%:

 

TABLE 44: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH A LTV GREATER THAN 80%
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)        For the Year Ended  
December 31, 2014  
By State:OutstandingExposure90 Days
Past Due
NonaccrualNet Charge-offs

Ohio

 $          1,123             1,838   -   9   9 

Michigan

  613           882   -   7   8 

Illinois

  346           507   -   6   6 

Indiana

  260           404   -   4   3 

Kentucky

  246           390   -   3   3 

Florida

  107           143   -   2   2 

All other states

  275           376   -   5   4 

Total

 $2,970           4,540       -     36         35 

TABLE 50: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH A LTV GREATER THAN 80%     

 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)                  For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
 

 

   

 

 

 
   Outstanding   Exposure   90 Days
Past Due
   Nonaccrual     Net Charge-offs 

 

 

By State:

            

Ohio

  $1,029            1,826       -        9             5   

Michigan

   434            666       -        5             2   

Illinois

   264            402       -        3             3   

Indiana

   185            302       -        2             1   

Kentucky

   172            297       -        2             1   

Florida

   82            114       -        2             -   

All other states

   183            260       -        4             3   

 

 

Total

  $        2,349            3,867       -        27             15   

 

 

 

6573  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

TABLE 45: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH A LTV GREATER THAN 80%
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)        For the Year Ended  
December 31, 2013  
TABLE 51: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH A LTV GREATER THAN 80%TABLE 51: HOME EQUITY PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH A LTV GREATER THAN 80%

As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)      For the Year Ended    
December 31, 2015    

   

 

 

      Outstanding   Exposure   90 Days
Past Due
   Nonaccrual   Net Charge-offs

By State:    OutstandingExposure90 Days
Past Due
NonaccrualNet Charge-offs           

Ohio

 $            1,161        1,868       -    10      18   $1,081            1,830      -        10        6  

Michigan

 697        987   -  7  14    519            773      -        5        5  

Illinois

 383        554   -  6  9    305            457      -        3        3  

Indiana

 296        454   -  3  4    220            352      -        3        3  

Kentucky

 278        436   -  2  3    208            344      -        2        1  

Florida

 116        157   -  3  4    95            129      -        2        1  

All other states

 317        425   -  4  7    228            320      -        5        2  

Total

 $3,248        4,881   -  35  59   $        2,656            4,205      -        30        21  

 

Automobile Portfolioportfolio

The Bancorp’s automobile portfolio balances have declined since December 31, 2015 through targeting more profitable risk-adjusted

returns. As a result, the concentration of lower FICO (<690) origination balances have increased with overall credit quality remaining within targeted credit risk tolerance. All concentration and guideline changes are monitored monthly to ensure alignment with original credit performance and return projections.

The following table provides an analysis of automobile portfolio loans outstanding disaggregated based upon FICO score:

TABLE 52: AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY FICO SCORE AT ORIGINATION 

 

 
   2016  2015 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)  

 

    Outstanding

   % of Total           Outstanding   % of Total        

 

 

FICO£ 690

  $1,714            17  $1,724         15 % 

FICO > 690

   8,269            83    9,769         85     

 

 

Total

  $        9,983            100 %  $        11,493         100 % 

 

 

The automobile portfolio is characterized by direct and indirect lending products to consumers. As of December 31, 2014, 51%2016, 47% of the automobile loan portfolio is comprised of loans collateralized by new

new automobiles. It is a common industry practice to advance on automobile loans an amount in excess of the automobile value due to the inclusion of taxes, title and other fees paid at closing. The Bancorp monitors its exposure to these higher risk loans.

 

 

The following table provides an analysis of automobile portfolio loans outstanding by LTV at origination:

 

TABLE 46: AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV AT ORIGINATION 
TABLE 53: AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV AT ORIGINATIONTABLE 53: AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY LTV AT ORIGINATION     

 

 
2014 2013   2016   2015 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)Outstanding Weighted
  Average LTV  
 Outstanding Weighted
      Average LTV      
   

    Outstanding

   Weighted-
    Average LTV    
       Outstanding   Weighted-
        Average LTV      
 

 

 

LTV£ 100%

$8,212        81.6 % $8,306        81.4 %    $6,637             82.0 %   $7,740          81.7% 

LTV > 100%

 3,825        111.0  3,678        110.7        3,346             111.7         3,753          111.3    

 

 

Total

$      12,037        91.3 % $            11,984        90.7 %    $        9,983             92.4 %   $        11,493          91.7% 

 

 
The following table provides an analysis of the Bancorp’s automobile portfolio loans with a LTV at origination greater than 100% as of and for the years ended:The following table provides an analysis of the Bancorp’s automobile portfolio loans with a LTV at origination greater than 100% as of and for the years ended: 
TABLE 54: AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH A LTV GREATER THAN 100%TABLE 54: AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH A LTV GREATER THAN 100% 

 
      90 Days Past         
($ in millions)      Outstanding   Due and Accruing   Nonaccrual   Net Charge-offs 

 

December 31, 2016

  $        3,346          5        1            23           

December 31, 2015

   3,753          5        1            20           

 

Credit card portfolio

The credit card portfolio consists of predominately prime accounts with 97% of loan balances existing within the Bancorp’s footprint as of December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 78% and 80%, respectively, of the outstanding balances were

originated through branch-based relationships with the remainder coming from direct mail campaigns and online acquisitions.

74  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table provides an analysis of the Bancorp’s automobilecredit card portfolio loans with a LTV at origination greater than 100%:outstanding disaggregated based upon FICO score:

 

TABLE 47: AUTOMOBILE PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING WITH A LTV GREATER THAN 100% 
As of ($ in millions) 
        Outstanding       90 Days Past
Due and Accruing
      Nonaccrual      Net Charge-offs for the
Year Ended
 

December 31, 2014

$                3,825  5   1   16  

December 31, 2013

 3,678  5  1  14 
TABLE 55: CREDIT CARD PORTFOLIO LOANS OUTSTANDING BY FICO SCORE AT ORIGINATION 

 

 
   2016   2015 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)  Outstanding   % of Total                 Outstanding   % of Total         

 

 

FICO£ 659

  $45        2 %   $45        2 % 

FICO 660-719

   521        23         506        22     

FICO³ 720

   1,671        75         1,708        76     

 

 

Total

  $            2,237        100 %   $        2,259        100 % 

 

 

 

HAMP and HARP Programs

For residential mortgage loans serviced for FHLMC and FNMA, the Bancorp participates in the HAMP and HARP programs. For loans refinanced under the HARP program, the Bancorp strictly adheres to the underwriting requirements of the program. Loan restructuring under the HAMP program is performed on behalf of FHLMC or FNMA and the Bancorp does not take possession of these loans during the modification process. Therefore, participation in these programs does not significantly impact the Bancorp’s credit quality statistics and these loans are not included in the Bancorp’s TDRs as they are not assets of the Bancorp. In the event there is a representation and warranty violation on loans sold through the programs, the Bancorp may be required to repurchase the sold loans. As of December 31, 2016, repurchased loans restructured or refinanced under these programs were immaterial to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $12 million and $14 million, respectively, of loans refinanced under HARP were included in loans held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bancorp recognized $6 million of noninterest income in mortgage banking net revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income related to the sale of loans restructured or refinanced under the HAMP and HARP programs for both periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

European Exposure

The Bancorp has no direct sovereign exposure to any European government as of December 31, 2014.2016. In providing services to our customers, the Bancorp routinely enters into financial transactions with foreign domiciled and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign businesses as well as foreign financial institutions. These financial transactions are in the form of loans, loan commitments, letters of credit, derivatives,

guarantees, banker’s acceptances and securities. The Bancorp’s risk appetite for foreign country exposure is managed by having established country exposure limits. The Bancorp’s total exposure to European domiciled or owned businesses and European financial institutions was $4.4$2.8 billion and funded exposure was $2.3$1.3 billion as of December 31, 2014.2016. Additionally, the Bancorp was within its established country exposure limits for all European countries.

The Bancorp has been closely monitoring the Brexit situation and its potential impact on the Bancorp. The Bancorp’s United Kingdom exposure is shown in the following table.

 

 

The following table provides detail about the Bancorp’s exposure to all European domiciled and ownedU.S. subsidiaries of European businesses andas well as European financial institutions as of December 31, 2014:

2016:

 

TABLE 48: EUROPEAN EXPOSURE 
TABLE 56: EUROPEAN EXPOSURETABLE 56: EUROPEAN EXPOSURE 

 
 Sovereigns Financial Institutions Non-Financial
Institutions
 Total   Sovereigns   Financial Institutions   Non-Financial
Institutions
   Total 
($ in millions)  Total
Exposure
 Funded
Exposure
 Total
Exposure
 Funded
Exposure
 Total
Exposure
 Funded
Exposure
 Total      
Exposure   (a)
 Funded
 Exposure 
   Total
    Exposure(a)
   Funded
Exposure   
   Total
  Exposure(a)
   Funded
Exposure   
   Total
  Exposure(a)
   Funded
Exposure   
   Total
  Exposure(a)
   Funded
Exposure    
 

 

Peripheral Europe(b)

$ -   -  -    -    162  91  162        91   $-    -      79    37      117    45      196    82   

Other Eurozone(c)

 -  -  11  11    3,145  1,682  3,156        1,693    -    -      343    107      1,375    749      1,718    856   

 

Total Eurozone

 -  -  11  11  3,307  1,773  3,318        1,784   $-    -      422    144      1,492    794      1,914    938   

United Kingdom

   -    -      55    55      740    304      795    359   

Other Europe(d)

 -  -  30  25  1,052  510  1,082        535    -    -      3    3      111    34      114    37   

 

Total Europe

$ -   -  41  36  4,359  2,283   4,400  (e)   2,319   $-    -      480    202      2,343    1,132      2,823    1,334   

 
(a)

Total exposure includes funded exposure and unfunded commitments, reported net of collateral.commitments.

(b)

Peripheral Europe includes Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain.

(c)

Eurozone includes countries participating in the European common currency (Euro).

(d)

Other Europe includes European countries not part of the Eurozone (primarily the United KingdomSwitzerland, Norway, and Switzerland)Sweden).

(e)

Includes $1,778 related to U.S. based customers owned by European entities.

66  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Analysis of Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and leases for which ultimate collectability of the full amount of the principal and/or interest is uncertain; restructured commercial and credit card loans which have not yet met the requirements to be classified as a performing asset; restructured consumer loans which are 90 days past due based on the restructured terms unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection; and certain other assets, including OREO and other repossessed property. A summary of nonperforming assets is included in Table 49.57. For further information on the Bancorp’s policies related to accounting for delinquent and nonperforming loans and leases, refer to the

Nonaccrual Loans and Leases section of Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Total nonperformingNonperforming assets including loans held for sale, were $783$751 million at December 31, 20142016 compared to $986$659 million at December 31, 2013.2015. At December 31, 2014, $392016, $13 million of nonaccrual loans, consisting primarily of real estate secured loans were held for sale, compared to $6$12 million at December 31, 2013.2015.

Total nonperforming        Nonperforming portfolio assets including loans held for sale, as a percentagepercent of total loans and leases and other assets, including OREO were 0.80% as of December 31, 2014 were 0.86%,2016 compared to 1.10%0.70% as of December 31, 2013. Excluding2015. Nonaccrual loans and leases secured by real estate were 25% of total nonaccrual loans held for sale, nonperforming assets as a percentage of portfolio loans,and leases and other assets, including OREO were 0.82% as of December 31, 2014,2016 compared to 1.10%43% as of December 31, 2013. The composition of nonaccrual loans and leases continues to be concentrated in real estate as 50% of2015.

75  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Commercial portfolio nonaccrual loans and leases were secured by real estate as of$523 million at December 31, 2014 compared to 60% as2016, an increase of $182 million from December 31, 2013.2015 primarily due to increases of $170 million in the reserve-based lending energy portfolio and the impact of low oil prices during the year ended 2016.

Commercial nonperformingConsumer portfolio nonaccrual loans and leases were $391$137 million at December 31, 2014,2016, a decrease of $73$28 million from December 31, 2013 as charge-offs, loan paydowns/payoffs, loan transfers to performing and loans sold from the portfolio outpaced new nonaccruals. Excluding commercial nonperforming loans and leases held for sale, commercial nonperforming loans and leases at December 31, 2014 decreased $91 million compared to December 31, 2013.

Consumer nonperforming loans and leases were $227 million at December 31, 2014, a decrease of $66 million from December 31, 2013 as loan pay downs/payoffs, charge-offs and transfers to performing and OREO outpaced new nonaccrual loans. Excluding consumer nonperforming loans and leases held for sale, consumer nonperforming loans and leases at December 31, 2014 decreased $81 million compared to December 31, 2013. Geographical market conditions continue to be a large driver of nonaccrual activity as Florida properties represent approximately 11% and seven percent of residential mortgage and home equity balances, respectively, but represent 32% and 15% of nonaccrual loans for each category at December 31, 2014.2015. Refer to Table 5058 for a rollforward of the nonperformingnonaccrual loans and leases.

OREO and other repossessed property was $165$78 million at December 31, 2014,2016, compared to $229$141 million at December 31, 2013.

2015. The Bancorp recognized $26$17 million and $45$24 million in losses on the sale or write-down of OREO properties in 2014during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The decrease from

During the prior year was primarily due to a modest improvement in general economic conditions.

In 2014years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013,2015, approximately $49$41 million and $71$35 million, respectively, of interest income would have been recognized if the nonaccrual and renegotiated loans and leases on nonaccrual status had been current in accordance with their original terms. Although these values help demonstrate the costs of carrying nonaccrual credits, the Bancorp does not expect to recover the full amount of

interest as nonaccrual loans and leases are generally carried below their principal balance.

 

 

67  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

TABLE 49: SUMMARY OF NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND DELINQUENT LOANS 
TABLE 57: SUMMARY OF NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND DELINQUENT LOANSTABLE 57: SUMMARY OF NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND DELINQUENT LOANS 

 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)2014     2013   2012   2011   2010        2016   2015   2014   2013   2012     

Nonaccrual loans and leases:

 

Nonaccrual portfolio loans and leases:

      

Commercial and industrial loans

  $        302  82  86  127  234    

Commercial mortgage loans

   27  56  64  90  215    

Commercial construction loans

   -   -   -  10  70    

Commercial leases

   2   -  3  3  1    

Residential mortgage loans

   17  28  44  83  114    

Home equity

   55  62  72  74  30    

Other consumer loans and leases

   -   -   -   -  1    

Nonaccrual portfolio restructured loans and leases:

      

Commercial and industrial loans

$86  127  234  408  473        176  177  142  154  96    

Commercial mortgage loans

 64  90  215  358  407        14(c)   25(c)   71(c)   53(c)  67    

Commercial construction loans

 -  10  70  123  182        -   -   -  19  6    

Commercial leases

 3  3  1  9  11        2  1  1  2  8    

Residential mortgage loans

 44  83  114  134  152        17  23  33  83  123    

Home equity

 72  74  30  25  23        18  17  21  19  23    

Automobile loans

 -   -   -   -   1        2  2  1  1  2    

Other consumer loans and leases

 -   -   1  1  84     

Restructured loans and leases:

Commercial and industrial loans

 142  154  96  79  95     

Commercial mortgage loans(e)

 71  53  67  63  28     

Commercial construction loans

 -   19  6  15  10     

Commercial leases

 1  2  8  3  8     

Residential mortgage loans

 33  83  123  141  116     

Home equity

 21  19  23  29  33     

Automobile loans

 1  1  2  2  2     

Credit card and other

 41  33  39  48  55     

Total nonperforming portfolio loans and leases(d)

 579  751  1,029  1,438  1,680     

OREO and other repossessed property(c)

 165  229  257  378  494     

Credit card

   28  33  41  33  39    

 

Total nonaccrual portfolio loans and leases(b)

   660  506  579  751  1,029    

OREO and other repossessed property

   78  141   165(d)   229(d)   257(d)  

 

Total nonperforming portfolio assets

 744  980  1,286  1,816  2,174        738  647  744  980  1,286    

Nonaccrual loans held for sale

 39  6  29  138  294        4  1  24  6  25    

Total nonperforming assets including loans held for sale

$                783  986  1,315  1,954  2,468     

Nonaccrual restructured loans held for sale

   9  11  15   -  4    

 

Total nonperforming assets

  $751  659  783  986  1,315    

 

Loans and leases 90 days past due and accruing:

      

Commercial and industrial loans

$-   -   1  4  16       $4  7   -   -  1    

Commercial mortgage loans

 -   -   22  3  11        -   -   -   -  22    

Commercial construction loans

 -   -   1  1  3        -   -   -   -  1    

Residential mortgage loans(b)

 56  66  75  79  100     

Residential mortgage loans(a)

   49  40  56  66  75    

Home equity

 -   -   58  74  89        -   -   -   -  58    

Automobile loans

 8  8  8  9  13        9  10  8  8  8    

Credit card and other

 23  29  30  30  42     

Credit card

   22  18  23  29  30    

 

Total loans and leases 90 days past due and accruing

$87  103  195  200  274       $84  75  87  103  195    

Nonperforming assets as a percent of portfolio loans, leases and other assets, including OREO(a)

 0.82 %  1.10  1.49  2.23  2.79     

Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percent of nonperforming assets(a)

 178  161  144  124  138     

 

Nonperforming portfolio assets as a percent of portfolio loans and leases and OREO

   0.80  %  0.70  0.82  1.10  1.49    

ALLL as a percent of nonperforming portfolio assets

   170  197  178  161  144    

 
(a)

Excludes nonaccrual loans held for sale.

(b)

Information for all periods presented excludes loansadvances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by  the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. AsThese advances were$312, $335, $373, $378 and $414 as ofDecember 31, 20142016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010 these advances were$373, $378, $414, $309 and $279,2012, respectively. The Bancorp recognized losses of$136, $8, $13, $5 and $2 for the yearyears endedDecember 31, 2014,2016 $5 for, 2015, 2014, 2013 and $2 for 2012, due to claim denials and curtailments associated with these advances.

(c)

Excludes$71, $77, $72, $64 and $38 of OREO related to government insured loans atDecember 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

(d)(b)

Includes$94, $6, $9, $10 $10, $17 and $24$10 of nonaccrual government insured commercial loans whose repayments are insured by the SBA atDecember 31, 20142016, 2015, 2014, 2013 2012, 2011 and 2010,2012, respectively, and$4,1,$2, $1,$4, $2, and $0$1 of restructured nonaccrual government insured commercial loans atDecember 31, 20142016, 2015, 2014, 2013 2012, 2011 and 2010,2012, respectively.

(e)(c)

Excludes$2119of restructured nonaccrual loans atDecember 31, 20142016, $20 at December 31, 2015 and $21 at both December 31, 2014 and 2013 associated with a  consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party.

(d)

Excludes $71, $77 and $72 of OREO related to government insured loans at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Bancorp has historically  excluded government guaranteed loans classified in OREO from its nonperforming asset disclosures. Upon the prospective adoption on January 1, 2015 of ASU 2014-14, “Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans Upon Foreclosure,” government guaranteed loans meeting certain criteria will be reclassified to other receivables rather than OREO upon foreclosure. Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the adoption of this amended guidance.

 

6876  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following table provides a rollforward of portfolio nonperformingnonaccrual loans and leases, by portfolio segment:

 

TABLE 50: ROLLFORWARD OF PORTFOLIO NONPERFORMING LOANS AND LEASES 
For the year ended December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)Commercial  Residential
Mortgage
 Consumer  Total         

Beginning Balance

$458  166  127 $751            

Transfers to nonperforming

 520  135  219  874            

Transfers to performing

 (22 (39 (42 (103)            

Transfers to performing (restructured)

 (49 (40 (46 (135)            

Transfers to held for sale

 (4 (24 -     (28)            

Loans sold from portfolio

 (43 -     -     (43)            

Loan paydowns/payoffs

 (181 (41 (9 (231)            

Transfers to other real estate owned

 (41 (67 (22 (130)            

Charge-offs

 (279 (13 (92 (384)            

Draws/other extensions of credit

 8  -     -     8            

Ending Balance

$                    367  77  135 $579            

    

                 

For the year ended December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)

            

Beginning Balance

$697  237  95 $    1,029            

Transfers to nonperforming

 409  204  297  910            

Transfers to performing

 (9 (52 (60 (121)            

Transfers to performing (restructured)

 (15 (41 (62 (118)            

Transfers to held for sale

 (3 -     -     (3)            

Loans sold from portfolio

 (38 -     -     (38)            

Loan paydowns/payoffs

 (295 (112 (11 (418)            

Transfers to other real estate owned

 (81 (73 (13 (167)            

Charge-offs (recoveries)

 (221 3  (122 (340)            

Draws/other extensions of credit

 14  -     3  17            

Ending Balance

$458  166  127 $751            
TABLE 58: ROLLFORWARD OF PORTFOLIO NONACCRUAL LOANS AND LEASES     

 

 
       Residential         
For the year ended December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  Commercial   Mortgage   Consumer   Total 

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

  $                    341     51     114     506    

Transfers to nonaccrual status

   716     51     149     916    

Transfers to accrual status

   (13)    (43)    (70)    (126)   

Transfers to held for sale

   (42)            (42)   

Loans sold from portfolio

   (11)            (11)   

Loan paydowns/payoffs

   (256)    (7)    (31)    (294)   

Transfers to OREO

   (8)    (14)    (11)    (33)   

Charge-offs

   (232)    (4)    (48)    (284)   

Draws/other extensions of credit

   28             28    

 

 

Balance, end of period

  $523     34     103     660    

 

 
        

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)

        

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

  $367     77     135     579    

Transfers to nonaccrual status

   515     65     155     735    

Transfers to accrual status

   (9)    (39)    (68)    (116)   

Transfers from held for sale

   -            5    

Transfers to held for sale

   (12)        (1)    (13)   

Loans sold from portfolio

   (11)            (11)   

Loan paydowns/payoffs

   (189)    (15)    (28)    (232)   

Transfers to OREO

   (32)    (29)    (18)    (79)   

Charge-offs

   (298)    (13)    (61)    (372)   

Draws/other extensions of credit

   10             10    

 

 

Balance, end of period

  $341     51     114     506    

 

 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

If a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, the Bancorp may consider, in certain circumstances, modifying the terms of their loan to maximize collection of amounts due. Typically, these modifications reduce the loan interest rate, extend the loan term, reduce the accrued interest or in limited circumstances, reduce the principal balance of the loan. These modifications are classified as TDRs.

At the time of modification, the Bancorp maintains certain consumer loan TDRs (including residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, and other consumer loans) on accrual status, provided there is reasonable assurance of repayment and performance according to the modified terms based upon a current, well-documented credit evaluation. Commercial loans

modified as part of a TDR are maintained on accrual status provided there is a sustained payment history of six months or greater prior to the

modification in accordance with the modified terms and all remaining contractual payments under the modified terms are reasonably assured of collection. TDRs of commercial loans and credit card loans that do not have a sustained payment history of six months or greater in accordance with the modified terms remain on nonaccrual status until a six monthsix-month payment history is sustained.

Consumer restructured loans on accrual status totaled $905$958 million and $1.7 billion$979 million at December 31, 20142016 and December 31, 2013,2015, respectively. The decrease from the prior year was primarily due to the transfer of $720 million of restructured residential mortgage loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale during the fourth quarter of 2014. As a result of the transfer, the Bancorp recognized a charge-off of $87 million in 2014. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the percentage of restructured residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, and credit card loans that are past due 30 days or more were 40%30%, 12% and 33%30%, respectively.

 

The following tables summarize TDRs by loan type and delinquency status:

 

TABLE 51: PERFORMING AND NONPERFORMING TDRs                   
TABLE 59: ACCRUING AND NONACCRUING PORTFOLIO TDRsTABLE 59: ACCRUING AND NONACCRUING PORTFOLIO TDRs 
 Performing       

 
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)  Current  30-89 Days
Past Due
 90 Days or
More Past Due
   Nonaccrual Total        
      Accruing         
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)          Current   30-89 Days
Past Due
   90 Days or    
More Past Due    
   Nonaccruing   Total       

 

Commercial loans(b)(c)

$ 867  2      -          214     $1,083       $    319    3        -                192      514     

Residential mortgage loans(a)(c)

 312  54      119          33      518     

Residential mortgage loans(a)

     458    56        121                17      652     

Home equity

 337  23      -           21      381          269    18        -                18      305     

Automobile loans

     12    -        -                2      14     

Credit card

 31  6      -           41      78          20    4         -                28      52     

Automobile and other consumer loans and leases

 22  1      -           1      24     

 

Total

$ 1,569  86      119           310     $        2,084       $    1,078    81        121                257      1,537     

 
(a)

Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. As ofDecember 31, 20142016, these advances represented$165230of current loans,$4246of 30-89 days past due loans and$102107 of 90 days or more past due loans.

(b)

As ofDecember 31, 20142016, excludes$7 of restructured accruing loans and$2119 of restructured nonaccrual loans associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party.

(c)

Excludes restructured nonaccrual loans held for sale.

 

6977  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

TABLE 52: PERFORMING AND NONPERFORMING TDRs 
TABLE 60: ACCRUING AND NONACCRUING PORTFOLIO TDRsTABLE 60: ACCRUING AND NONACCRUING PORTFOLIO TDRs 

 

 
  Performing       Accruing         
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)   Current      30-89 Days    
Past Due      
 90 Days or
More Past Due
   Nonaccrual Total      
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)       Current   30-89 Days
Past Due
   90 Days or    
More Past Due    
   Nonaccruing   Total       

 

Commercial loans(b)(c)

   869  -           -           228     $1,097    

$

   487    4        -          203        694     

Residential mortgage loans(a)

 1,045  82           114          84      1,325       443    54        110          23        630     

Home equity

 368  26           -           18      412       307    20        -          17        344     

Automobile loans

    17    -        -          2        19     

Credit card

 25  -           -           33      58       24    4        -          33        61     

Automobile and other consumer loans and leases

 24  1           -           1      26   

 

Total

               2,331  109           114           364     $          2,918    

$

   1,278    82        110          278        1,748     

 
(a)

Information includes loansadvances made pursuant to servicing agreements for GNMA mortgage pools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by  the VA. As of December 31, 2013,2015, these loansadvances represented $155$202 of current loans, $31$42 of 30-89 days past due loans and $88$99 of 90 days or more past due loans.

(b)

As of December 31, 2013,2015, excludes $8$7 of restructured accruing loans and $21$20 of restructured nonaccrual loans associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party.

(c)

Excludes restructured nonaccrual loans held for sale.

 

Analysis of Net Loan Charge-offs

Net charge-offs were 6439 bps and 5848 bps of average portfolio loans and leases for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Table 5361 provides a summary of credit loss experience and net charge-offs as a percentage of average portfolio loans and leases outstanding by loan category.

Commercial net charge-offs decreased to $190 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $261 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The year ended December 31, 2015 included a charge-off associated with the restructuring of a student loan backed commercial credit originated in 2007, included in net charge-offs on commercial and industrial loans. The ratio of commercial loan and lease net charge-offs to average portfolio commercial loans and leases increaseddecreased to 4833 bps during 2014the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 4446 bps in 2013, as a result of increases in net charge-offs of $41 million partially offset by an increase in average commercial loan and lease balances of $3.4 billion. The increase in net charge-offs during 2014 was driven primarily by an increase in charge-offs on certain commercial and industrial loans, primarily due to $96 million in aggregate net charge-offs related to six impaired commercial and industrial loansthe same period in the first and third quarters of 2014. The increases in commercial and industrial loan and commercial construction loan net charge-offs during 2014 were partially offset by a decrease in commercial mortgage loan net charge-offs, compared to 2013, due to improvements in general economic conditions and previous actions taken by the Bancorp to address problem loans. Net charge-offs for 2014 related to nonowner-occupied commercial real estate were $18 million compared to $27 million in 2013. Net charge-offs related to nonowner-occupied commercial real estate are recorded in the commercial mortgage loans and commercial construction loans captions in Table 53. Net charge-offs on these loans represented seven percent of total commercial loan and lease net charge-offs in 2014 and 12% in 2013.prior year.

The ratio of consumer loan and lease net charge-offs to average consumer loans and leases increaseddecreased to 8648 bps in 2014for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 7751 bps in 2013. Netfor the year ended December 31, 2015. Residential mortgage loan net charge-offs, on residential mortgage loans, which typically involve partial charge-offs based upon

appraised values of underlying collateral, increased $66decreased $7 million from the prior year. The increase in net charge-offs on residential mortgage loans was primarily due to an $87 million charge-off related to the transfer of certain residential mortgage loans from the portfolio to held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2014, partially offsetDecember 31, 2015, driven by improvements in delinquencies and loss severities. The Bancorp expects the composition of the residential mortgage portfolio to improve as it continues to retain high quality, shorter duration residential mortgage loans that are originated through its branch network as a low-cost, refinance product of conforming residential mortgage loans.

Home equity net charge-offs decreased $38$12 million compared to the prior year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to improvements in loss severities. In addition, managementManagement actively manages lines of credit and makes reductions in lending limits when it believes it is necessary based on FICO score deterioration and property devaluation.

Automobile loan net charge-offs increased $5$7 million compared to 2013the same period in the prior year primarily due to increased delinquencies and lossesa strategic shift focusing on improving risk adjusted return along with a modest decline in the indirect portfolio. used car values at auction.

Credit card and other consumer loans and leases net charge-offs increased $4 million from 2013.remained relatively flat compared to the prior year. The Bancorp utilizes a risk-adjusted pricing methodology to ensure adequate compensation is received for those products that have higher credit costs.

 

 

7078  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

TABLE 53: SUMMARY OF CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE                             
TABLE 61: SUMMARY OF CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCETABLE 61: SUMMARY OF CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE         

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014      2013      2012      2011      2010             2016      2015      2014      2013      2012             

 

Losses charged-off:

         

Commercial and industrial loans

$          (248 (207 (194 (314 (631  $            (205)  (253)    (248)    (207)    (194)       

Commercial mortgage loans

 (37 (66 (120 (211 (541   (22)  (39)    (37)    (66)    (120)       

Commercial construction loans

 (13 (9 (34 (89 (265     (4)    (13)    (9)    (34)       

Commercial leases

 (1 (2 (10 (1 (7   (5)  (2)    (1)    (2)    (10)       

Residential mortgage loans

 (139 (70 (129 (180        (441   (19)  (28)    (139)    (70)    (129)       

Home equity

 (75 (114 (172 (234 (276   (41)  (55)    (75)    (114)    (172)       

Automobile loans

 (44 (44 (55 (85 (132   (54)  (46)    (44)    (44)    (55)       

Credit card

 (95        (92        (90        (114 (164   (89)  (94)    (95)    (92)    (90)       

Other consumer loans and leases

 (27  (33  (33  (86  (28    (21)  (21)    (27)    (33)    (33)       

Total losses

 (679 (637 (837 (1,314 (2,485

 

Total losses charged-off

   (456)  (542)    (679)    (637)    (837)       

 

Recoveries of losses previously charged-off:

         

Commercial and industrial loans

 26  39  29  38  45     33  24    26    39    29       

Commercial mortgage loans

 11  19  21  16  17     7  12    11    19    21       

Commercial construction loans

 1  5  9  4  13     1  1    1    5    9       

Commercial leases

 -   1  2  3  5     1   -    -    1    2       

Residential mortgage loans

 13  10  7  7  2     9  11    13    10    7       

Home equity

 16  17  15  14  12     14  16    16    17    15       

Automobile loans

 17  22  24  32  44     19  18    17    22    24       

Credit card

 13  14  16  16  9     9  12    13    14    16       

Other consumer loans and leases

 7   9   10   12   10      1  2    7    9    10       

Total recoveries

 104  136  133  142  157  

 

Total recoveries of losses previously charged-off

   94  96    104    136    133       

 

Net losses charged-off:

         

Commercial and industrial loans

 (222 (168 (165 (276 (586   (172)  (229)    (222)    (168)    (165)       

Commercial mortgage loans

 (26 (47 (99 (195 (524   (15)  (27)    (26)    (47)    (99)       

Commercial construction loans

 (12 (4 (25 (85 (252   1  (3)    (12)    (4)    (25)       

Commercial leases

 (1 (1 (8 2  (2   (4)  (2)    (1)    (1)    (8)       

Residential mortgage loans

 (126 (60 (122 (173 (439   (10)  (17)    (126)    (60)    (122)       

Home equity

 (59 (97 (157 (220 (264   (27)  (39)    (59)    (97)    (157)       

Automobile loans

 (27 (22 (31 (53 (88   (35)  (28)    (27)    (22)    (31)       

Credit card

 (82 (78 (74 (98 (155   (80)  (82)    (82)    (78)    (74)       

Other consumer loans and leases

 (20  (24  (23  (74  (18    (20)  (19)    (20)    (24)    (23)       

 

Total net losses charged-off

$(575  (501  (704  (1,172  (2,328   $(362)  (446)    (575)    (501)    (704)       

Net charge-offs as a percent of average loans and leases (excluding held for sale):

 

Net losses charged-off as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases:

         

Commercial and industrial loans

 0.54 %  0.44  0.50  0.97  2.23     0.40 %  0.54    0.54    0.44    0.50       

Commercial mortgage loans

 0.34  0.56  1.02  1.89  4.58     0.23  0.38    0.34    0.56    1.02       

Commercial construction loans

 0.79  0.51  3.08  4.96  8.48     0.01  0.11    0.79    0.51    3.08       

Commercial leases

 0.01  0.04  0.22  (0.08 0.05     0.10  0.04    0.01    0.04    0.22       

Total commercial loans

 0.48   0.44   0.63   1.26   3.10   

 

Total commercial loans and leases

   0.33  0.46    0.48    0.44    0.63       

 

Residential mortgage loans

 0.99  0.48  1.07  1.75  5.49     0.07  0.13    0.99    0.48    1.07       

Home equity

 0.65  1.02  1.51  1.97  2.20     0.33  0.46    0.65    1.02    1.51       

Automobile loans

 0.22  0.18  0.26  0.47  0.85     0.33  0.24    0.22    0.18    0.26       

Credit card

 3.60  3.67  3.79  5.19  8.28     3.69  3.60    3.60    3.67    3.79       

Other consumer loans and leases

 5.80  6.71  7.02  15.29  2.58     2.93  3.26    5.80    6.71    7.02       

 

Total consumer loans and leases

 0.86   0.77   1.13   1.79   2.92      0.48  0.51    0.86    0.77    1.13       

Total net losses charged-off

 0.64 %   0.58   0.85   1.49   3.02  

 

Total net losses charged-off as a percent of average portfolio loans and leases

   0.39 %  0.48    0.64    0.58    0.85       

 

 

Allowance for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses is comprised of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments. The ALLL provides coverage for probable and estimable losses in the loan and lease portfolio. The Bancorp evaluates the ALLL each quarter to determine its adequacy to cover inherent losses. Several factors are taken into consideration in the determination of the overall ALLL, including an unallocated component. These factors include, but are not limited to, the overall risk profile of the loan and lease portfolios, net charge-off experience, the extent of impaired loans and leases, the level of nonaccrual loans and leases, the level of 90 days past due loans and leases and the overall level of the ALLL as a percentagepercent of loans.portfolio loans and leases. The Bancorp also considers overall asset quality trends, credit administration and portfolio management practices, risk identification practices, credit policy and underwriting practices,

overall portfolio growth, portfolio concentrations and current national and local

economic conditions that might impact the portfolio. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies section of MD&A for more information.

In 2014,During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bancorp refined certain estimation techniques associated with the ALLL. Such refinements included the introduction of individual loss rate migration analyses for several commercial loan portfolio stratifications as contrasted to the single composite loss rate migration analysis for the entire commercial loan portfolio which was used in prior periods. These refinements did not substantively change any material aspect of itsthe Bancorp’s overall approach in the determination of the ALLL and there have been no material changes in assumptions or estimation techniques as compared to prior periods that impacted the determination of the current period allowance. In addition to the ALLL, the Bancorp maintains a reserve for unfunded commitments recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

79  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The methodology used to determine the adequacy of this reserve is similar to the Bancorp’s methodology for determining the ALLL. The provision for unfunded commitments is included in other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

71  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The ALLL attributable to the portion of the residential mortgage and consumer loan and lease portfolio that has not been restructured is determined on a pooled basis with the segmentation based on the similarity of credit risk characteristics. Loss factors for real estate backed consumer loans are developed for each pool based on the trailing twelve month historical loss rate, as adjusted for certain prescriptive loss rate factors and certain qualitative adjustment factors. The prescriptive loss rate factors and qualitative adjustments are designed to reflect risks associated with current conditions and trends which are not believed to be fully reflected in the trailing twelve month historical loss rate. For real estate backed consumer loans, the prescriptive loss rate factors include adjustments for delinquency trends, LTV trends, refreshed FICO score trends and product mix, and the qualitative factors include adjustments for credit administrationchanges in policies or procedures in underwriting, monitoring or collections, economic conditions, portfolio mix, lending and portfoliorisk management practices, credit policypersonnel, results of internal audit and underwriting practicesquality control reviews, collateral values and the national and local economy.geographic concentrations. The Bancorp considers home price index trends in

its footprint when determining the national and local economy qualitative factor. The Bancorp also considers the volatility of collateral valuation trends when determining the unallocated component of the ALLL.collateral value qualitative factor.

The Bancorp’s determination of the ALLL for commercial loans is sensitive to the risk grades it assigns to these loans. In the event that 10% of commercial loans in each risk category would experience a downgrade of one risk category, the allowance for commercial loans would increase by approximately $162$190 million at December 31, 2014.2016. In addition, the Bancorp’s determination of the allowanceALLL for residential mortgage and consumer loans and leases is sensitive to changes in estimated loss rates. In the event that estimated loss rates would increase by 10%, the allowanceALLL for residential mortgage and consumer loans and leases would increase by approximately $34$31 million at December 31, 2014.2016. As several qualitative and quantitative factors are considered in determining the ALLL, these sensitivity analyses do not necessarily reflect the nature and extent of future changes in the ALLL. They are intended to provide insights into the impact of adverse changes to risk grades and estimated loss rates and do not imply any expectation of future deterioration in the risk ratings or loss rates. Given current processes employed by the Bancorp, management believes the risk grades and estimated loss rates currently assigned are appropriate.

 
TABLE 54: CHANGES IN ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES                           
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014        2013       2012       2011        2010          

ALLL:

Balance, beginning of period

$             1,582  1,854  2,255  3,004  3,749      

Impact of change in accounting principle

 -     -     -     -     45      

Losses charged-off

 (679 (637 (837 (1,314 (2,485)     

Recoveries of losses previously charged-off

 104  136  133  142  157      

Provision for loan and lease losses

 315     229     303     423     1,538      

Balance, end of period

$1,322         1,582         1,854         2,255         3,004      

Reserve for unfunded commitments:

Balance, beginning of period

$162  179  181  227  294      

Impact of change in accounting principle

 -     -     -     -     (43)      

Benefit from the reserve for unfunded commitments

 (27    (17    (2    (46    (24)      

Balance, end of period

$135     162     179     181     227      

TABLE 62: CHANGES IN ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

 

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  2016      2015          2014          2013          2012       

 

ALLL:

       

Balance, beginning of period

  $            1,272   1,322   1,582   1,854   2,255  

Charge-offs

   (456  (542  (679  (637  (837 

Recoveries of losses previously charged-off

   94   96   104   136   133  

Provision for loan and lease losses

   343   396   315   229   303  

 

Balance, end of period

  $1,253   1,272   1,322   1,582   1,854  

 

Reserve for unfunded commitments:

       

Balance, beginning of period

  $138   135   162   179   181  

Provision for (benefit from) unfunded commitments

   23   4   (27  (17  (2 

Charge-offs

   -   (1  -   -   -  

 

Balance, end of period

  $161   138   135   162   179  

 

 

Certain inherent but unconfirmed losses are probable within the loan and lease portfolio. The Bancorp’s current methodology for determining the level of losses is based on historical loss rates, current credit grades, specific allocation on impaired commercial credits above specified thresholds and restructured loans and other qualitative adjustments. Due to the heavy reliance on realized historical losses and the credit grade rating process, the model-derived estimate of ALLL tends to slightly lag behind the deterioration in the portfolio in a stable or deteriorating credit environment, and tendtends not to be as responsive when improved conditions have presented themselves. Given these model limitations, the qualitative adjustment factors may be incremental or decremental to the quantitative model results.

An unallocated component toof the ALLL is maintained to recognize the imprecision in estimating and measuring loss. The unallocated allowance as a percent of total portfolio loans and leases at both December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 was 0.12%. The unallocated allowance was eight percent9% of the total allowance as of both December 31, 2014 compared to seven percent as of2016 and December 31, 2013.2015.

As shown in Table 55,63, the ALLL as a percent of portfolio loans and leases was 1.47%1.36% at December 31, 2014,2016, compared to 1.79%1.37% at December 31, 2013.2015. The ALLL was $1.3 billion as ofat both December 31, 2014, compared to $1.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease was reflective of decreases in nonperforming loans2016 and leases and improved delinquency metrics in commercial and consumer loans and leases.2015.

 

 

7280  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

TABLE 55: ATTRIBUTION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES TO PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES 
TABLE 63: ATTRIBUTION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES TO PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASESTABLE 63: ATTRIBUTION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES TO PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES     

 
As of December 31 ($ in millions)2014    2013   2012   2011   2010             2016      2015            2014            2013            2012       

Allowance attributed to:

 

Attributed ALLL:

           

Commercial and industrial loans

$673  767  802  929  1,123         $718  652    673    767    802   

Commercial mortgage loans

 140  212  333  441  597          82  117    140    212    333   

Commercial construction loans

 17  26  33  77  158          16  24    17    26    33   

Commercial leases

 45  53  68  80  111          15  47    45    53    68   

Residential mortgage loans

 104  189  229  227  310          96  100    104    189    229   

Home equity

 87  94  143  195  265          58  67    87    94    143   

Automobile loans

 33  23  28  43  73          42  40    33    23    28   

Credit card

 104  92  87  106  158          102  99    104    92    87   

Other consumer loans and leases

 13  16  20  21  59          12  11    13    16    20   

Unallocated

 106  110   111   136   150          112  115    106    110    111   

Total ALLL

$1,322  1,582   1,854   2,255   3,004       

 

Total attributed ALLL

  $1,253  1,272    1,322    1,582    1,854   

 

Portfolio loans and leases:

           

Commercial and industrial loans

$40,765  39,316  36,038  30,783  27,191         $        41,676  42,131    40,765    39,316    36,038   

Commercial mortgage loans

 7,399  8,066  9,103  10,138  10,845          6,899  6,957    7,399    8,066    9,103   

Commercial construction loans

 2,069  1,039  698  1,020  2,048          3,903  3,214    2,069    1,039    698   

Commercial leases

 3,720  3,625  3,549  3,531  3,378          3,974  3,854    3,720    3,625    3,549   

Residential mortgage loans

 12,389  12,680  12,017  10,672  8,956          15,051  13,716    12,389    12,680    12,017   

Home equity

 8,886  9,246  10,018  10,719  11,513          7,695  8,301    8,886    9,246    10,018   

Automobile loans

 12,037  11,984  11,972  11,827  10,983          9,983  11,493    12,037    11,984    11,972   

Credit card

 2,401  2,294  2,097  1,978  1,896          2,237  2,259    2,401    2,294    2,097   

Other consumer loans and leases

 418  364   290   350   681          680  657    418    364    290   

 

Total portfolio loans and leases

$          90,084  88,614   85,782   81,018   77,491         $92,098  92,582    90,084    88,614    85,782   

Attributed allowance as a percent of respective portfolio loans and leases:

 

Attributed ALLL as a percent of respective portfolio loans and leases:

           

Commercial and industrial loans

 1.65 %  1.95  2.23  3.02  4.13          1.72 %  1.55    1.65    1.95    2.23   

Commercial mortgage loans

 1.89  2.63  3.66  4.35  5.50          1.19  1.68    1.89    2.63    3.66   

Commercial construction loans

 0.82  2.50  4.73  7.55  7.71          0.41  0.75    0.82    2.50    4.73   

Commercial leases

 1.21  1.46  1.92  2.27  3.29          0.38  1.22    1.21    1.46    1.92   

Residential mortgage loans

 0.84  1.49  1.91  2.13  3.46          0.64  0.73    0.84    1.49    1.91   

Home equity

 0.98  1.02  1.43  1.82  2.30          0.75  0.81    0.98    1.02    1.43   

Automobile loans

 0.27  0.19  0.23  0.36  0.66          0.42  0.35    0.27    0.19    0.23   

Credit card

 4.33  4.01  4.15  5.36  8.33          4.56  4.38    4.33    4.01    4.15   

Other consumer loans and leases

 3.11  4.40  6.90  6.00  8.66          1.76  1.67    3.11    4.40    6.90   

Unallocated (as a percent of total portfolio loans and leases)

 0.12  0.12   0.13   0.17   0.19       

Total portfolio loans and leases

 1.47 %  1.79   2.16   2.78   3.88       

Unallocated (as a percent of portfolio loans and leases)

   0.12  0.12    0.12    0.12    0.13   

 

Attributed ALLL as a percent of portfolio loans and leases

   1.36 %  1.37    1.47    1.79    2.16   

 

 

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT

Market risk arises fromis the day-to-day potential for the value of a financial instrument to increase or decrease due to movements in market fluctuationsfactors. The Bancorp’s market risk includes risks resulting from movements in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices that may result in potential reductions in net income.and commodity prices. Interest rate risk, a component of market risk, isprimarily impacts the exposure to adverse changes in netBancorp’s NII and interest sensitive fee income or financial position due tocategories through changes in interest rates.income on earning assets and cost of interest bearing liabilities, and through fee items that are related to interest sensitive activities such as mortgage origination and servicing income. Management considers interest rate risk a prominent market risk in terms of its potential impact on earnings. Interest rate risk canmay occur for any one or more of the following reasons:

  

Assets and liabilities may mature or reprice at different times;

  

Short-term and long-term market interest rates may change by different amounts; or

  

The expected maturitymaturities of various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change.

In addition to the direct impact of interest rate changes on net interest income,NII, interest rates can indirectly impact earnings through their effect on loan and deposit demand, credit losses, mortgage originations, the value of servicing rights and other sources of the Bancorp’s earnings. Stability of the Bancorp’s net income is largely dependent upon the effective management of interest rate risk. Management continually reviews

the Bancorp’s balance sheet composition and earnings flows and models the interest rate risk, and possible actions to reduce this risk, given numerous possible future interest rate scenarios.

A series of Policy Limits and Key Risk Indicators are employed to ensure that this risk is managed within the Bancorp’s risk tolerance.

Interest Rate Risk Management Oversight

The Bancorp’s Executive ALCO, which includes senior management representatives and is accountable to the ERM Committee,ERMC, monitors and manages interest rate risk within Board approved policy limits. In addition to the risk management activities of ALCO, the Bancorp has a Market Risk Management function as part of ERM that provides independent oversight of market risk activities.

Net Interest Income Sensitivity

The Bancorp employs a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage its interest rate risk, including the use of an NII simulation model to analyze the sensitivity of net interest incomeNII to changingchanges in interest rates. The model is based on contractual and assumed cash flows and repricing characteristics for all of the Bancorp’s assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet exposures and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and attrition rates of certain liabilities. The model also includes senior management’s projections of the future volume and pricing of each of the product lines offered by the Bancorp as well as other pertinent assumptions. Actual results may differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, deviations from projected assumptions, as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.

 

 

73  Fifth Third Bancorp

81  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The Bancorp’s interest rate risk exposure is evaluated by measuring the anticipated change in net interest incomeNII over 12-month and 24-month horizons assuming 100 bps and 200 bps parallel ramped increases and a 75 bps parallel ramped decrease in interest rates. In accordance with internal policy, rate movements are assumed to occur over one year and are sustained thereafter. The analysis would typically include

100 bps and 200 bps parallel ramped decreases in interest rates; however, this analysis is currently omitted due to the current low levels of certain interest rates. Applying the ramps would result in certain interest rates becoming negative in the parallel ramped decrease scenarios.

In this economic cycle, banks have experienced significant growth in deposit balances, particularly in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. The Bancorp, like other banks, is exposed to deposit balance run-off in a rising interest rate environment. In consideration of this risk, the Bancorp’s NII sensitivity modeling assumes that approximately $2.5 billion of noninterest-bearing demand deposit balances run-off above what is included in senior management’s baseline projections for each 100 bps increase in

short-term market interest rates. These noninterest-bearing demand deposit balances are modeled to flow into funding products that reprice in conjunction with market rate increases.

Another important deposit modeling assumption is the amount by which interest-bearing deposit rates will increase when market rates increase. This deposit repricing sensitivity is known as the beta, and it represents the expected amount by which Bancorp deposit rates will increase for a given increase in short-term market rates. The Bancorp’s NII sensitivity modeling assumes a weighted-average interest-bearing deposit beta of 69% at December 31, 2016, which is approximately 20 percentage points higher than the beta that the Bancorp experienced in the last FRB tightening cycle from June 2004 to June 2006.

The Bancorp continually evaluates the sensitivity of its interest rate risk measures to these important deposit modeling assumptions. The Bancorp also evaluates the sensitivity of other important modeling assumptions, such as loan and security prepayments and early withdrawals on fixed-rate customer liabilities.

 

 

The following table shows the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile and ALCO policy limits as of December 31:

 

TABLE 56: ESTIMATED NII SENSITIVITY PROFILE 
 2014 2013 
 Percent Change in NII
(FTE)
     ALCO Policy Limits       Percent Change in NII  
(FTE)
 ALCO Policy Limits 
Change in Interest Rates (bps)12 Months 13 to 24
Months
  12 Months13 to 24
Months
  12 Months 13 to 24
Months
  12 Months13 to 24  
Months  
 

+ 200

 2.19       6.49(4.00)(6.00) 1.73       6.89(4.00) (6.00)      

+ 100

 1.16        4.18 --  0.77        3.37 - -          
TABLE 64: ESTIMATED NII SENSITIVITY PROFILE AND ALCO POLICY LIMITS 

 

 
   2016   2015 
     % Change in NII (FTE)       ALCO Policy Limits       % Change in NII (FTE)       ALCO Policy Limits   
Change in Interest Rates (bps)  

  12  

  Months  

    13-24  
  Months  
   

  12  

  Months  

     13-24  
  Months  
   

  12  

  Months  

     13-24  
  Months  
   

  12  

  Months  

     13-24  
  Months  
 

 

 

+200 Ramp over 12 months

   1.88    6.78     (4.00)    (6.00)    2.05    5.93    (4.00)    (6.00) 

+100 Ramp over 12 months

   1.13     4.32             1.12    3.87         

  -75 Ramp over 6 months

   (5.77)    (10.62)            N/A    N/A         

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014,2016, the Bancorp’s net interest incomeNII would benefit in both year one and year two under thesethe parallel rate ramp increases. The benefit wasBancorp’s NII would decline in both year one and year two under the parallel 75 bps ramped decrease in interest rates. The NII sensitivity profile is attributable to the combination of floating-rate assets, including the predominantly floating-rate commercial loan portfolio, and certain intermediate-term fixed-rate liabilities. The benefit was up modestly compared tochange in the sensitivity as of December 31, 2013 with2016 for the exception of the +200 scenario from 13 to 24 months, which was down slightly. Improvements in the NII benefit were attributable to continued growth in commercial loans and core deposits, and the issuance of fixed-rate debt securities. The modest decline in the +200 scenario from 13 to 24first 12 months compared to December 31, 2013 was2015 is primarily attributable to fixed-rate mortgage asset growth, partially offset by runoff in the indirect automobile loan portfolio. The change in the sensitivity as of December 31, 2016 for the 13-24 month horizon

compared to December 31, 2015 is also attributable to fixed-rate mortgage asset growth, partially offset by runoff in the indirect automobile loan portfolio, but sensitivity is modestly improved from December 31, 2015 due to projected core deposit growth.

Tables 65 and 66 provide information on the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile given changes to certain key deposit modeling assumptions.

82  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table shows the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile with a $1.0 billion decrease and a $1.0 billion increase in expected loandemand deposit balances as of December 31, 2016:

TABLE 65: ESTIMATED NII SENSITIVITY ASSUMING A $1 BILLION CHANGE IN DEMAND DEPOSIT BALANCES   

 

   % Change in NII (FTE)
                   $1 Billion Balance Decrease                           $1 Billion Balance Increase             
Change in Interest Rates (bps)  

12

Months

  

13-24

Months

  

12

Months

   

13-24

Months

   

 

+200 Ramp over 12 months

   1.61    6.24     2.15    7.31    

+100 Ramp over 12 months

   1.00     4.05     1.27    4.58    

 

The following table shows the Bancorp’s estimated NII sensitivity profile with a 25% increase and security prepayment speeds.a 25% decrease to the deposit beta assumption as of December 31, 2016. The resulting weighted-average interest-bearing deposit betas included in this analysis are approximately 87% and 52%, respectively, as of December 31, 2016:

TABLE 66: ESTIMATED NII SENSITIVITY WITH DEPOSIT BETA ASSUMPTION CHANGES    

 

 
  % Change in NII (FTE) 
                  Betas 25% Higher                                   Betas 25% Lower                  
Change in Interest Rates (bps)     12    
    Months    
          13-24        
        Months         
  12    
Months    
  13-24        
Months        
    

 

 

+200 Ramp over 12 months

  (1.56)   (0.10)   5.32   13.66  

+100 Ramp over 12 months

  (0.59)   0.88   2.85   7.76  

 

 

Economic Value of Equity Sensitivity

The Bancorp also uses EVE as a measurement tool in managing interest rate risk. Whereas the net interest incomeNII sensitivity analysis

highlights the impact on forecasted NII on an FTE (non-GAAP) basis over one and two year time horizons, the EVE analysis is a point in time analysis of the economic sensitivity of current positions that incorporates all cash flows over their estimated remaining lives. The EVE of the balance sheet is defined as the discounted present value of all asset and net derivative cash flows less the discounted value of all liability cash flows. Due to this longer

horizon, the sensitivity of EVE to changes in the level of interest rates is a measure of longer-term interest rate risk. EVE values only the current balance sheet and does not incorporate the balance growth assumptions used in the NII sensitivity analysis. As with the NII simulation model, assumptions about the timing and variability of existing balance sheet cash flows are critical in the EVE analysis. Particularly important are assumptions driving loan and security prepayments and the expected balance attrition and pricing of transaction deposits.

 

 

The following table shows the Bancorp’s estimated EVE sensitivity profile as of December 31:

 

TABLE 57: ESTIMATED EVE SENSITIVITY PROFILE 
 2014   2013 
Change in Interest Rates (bps)    Change in EVE ALCO Policy Limit        Change in EVE ALCO Policy Limit 

+200

 (2.21)%  (12.00)    (5.78)%  (12.00

+100

 (0.62      (2.91

+25

 (0.06 (0.70

-25

 (0.05       0.63    
TABLE 67: ESTIMATED EVE SENSITIVITY PROFILE          

 

 
  2016  2015 
Change in Interest Rates (bps)     Change in EVE        ALCO Policy Limit      Change in EVE  ALCO Policy Limit     

 

 

+200 Shock

                      (4.96)    (12.00)   (5.21)   (12.00)     

+100 Shock

  (2.00)     -   (2.30)   -     

+25 Shock

  (0.36)     -   (0.44)   -     

 -75 Shock

  (0.14)     -   N/A   -     

 

 

 

The EVE sensitivity was modestlyto the +200 bps rising rate scenario is moderately negative at December 31, 20142016, and has improvedis also slightly negative to a 75 bps decline in market rates. The +100 and +200 bps rising rate sensitivities are down slightly from the EVE sensitivitysensitivities at December 31, 2013.2015. The lower leveldecrease in risk is related to long-term debt issuances, run-off of EVE risk since December 31, 2013 was attributable to continued growth inindirect automobile loan balances and a shorter average life of certain fixed-rate commercial loans and core deposits,leases. These items were partially offset by growth in the investment portfolio and the issuance of fixed-rate debt securities.mortgage loan balances.

While an instantaneous shift in interest rates wasis used in this analysis to provide an estimate of exposure, the Bancorp believes that a gradual shift in interest rates would have a much more modest impact. Since EVE measures the discounted present value of cash flows over the estimated lives of instruments, the change in EVE does not directly correlate to the degree that earnings would be impacted over a shorter time horizon (e.g., the current fiscal year). Further, EVE does not take into account factors such as future balance sheet growth, changes in product mix, changes in yield curve relationships and changing product spreads that could

mitigate or exacerbate the impact of changes in interest rates. The NII simulations and EVE analyses do not necessarily include certain

actions that management may undertake to manage risk in response to anticipatedactual changes in interest rates.

The Bancorp regularly evaluates its exposures to a static balance sheet forecast, LIBOR, Prime Rate and Primeother basis risks, nonparallel shifts in the yield curve twist risks and embedded options risk.risks. In addition, the impact on NII on an FTE basis and EVE of extreme changes in interest rates is modeled, wherein the Bancorp employs the use of yield curve shocks and environment-specific scenarios.

Use of Derivatives to Manage Interest Rate Risk

An integral component of the Bancorp’s interest rate risk management strategy is its use of derivative instruments to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings caused by changes in market interest rates. Examples of derivative instruments that the Bancorp may use as part of its interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, interest rate floors, interest rate caps, forward contracts, forward starting interest rate swaps, options, swaptions and TBA securities.

 

 

74

83  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

As part of its overall risk management strategy relative to its mortgage banking activity,activities, the Bancorp enters into forward contracts accounted for as free-standing derivatives to economically hedge IRLCs that are also considered free-standing derivatives. Additionally, the Bancorp economically hedges its exposure to mortgage loans held for sale through the use of forward contracts and mortgage options.

The Bancorp also establishesenters into derivative contracts with major financial institutions to economically hedge significant exposuresmarket risks assumed in interest rate derivative contracts with commercial customer accommodation derivative contracts.customers. Generally, these contracts have similar terms in order to protect the Bancorp from market volatility. Credit risk arises from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts, which

the Bancorp minimizes through collateral

arrangements, approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. For further information including the notional amount and fair values of these derivatives, refer to Note 1213 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements.

Portfolio Loans and Leases and Interest Rate Risk

Although the Bancorp’s portfolio loans and leases contain both fixed and floating/adjustable rateadjustable-rate products, the rates of interest earned by the Bancorp on the outstanding balances are generally established for a period of time. The interest rate sensitivity of loans and leases is directly related to the length of time the rate earned is established.

The following table summarizes the expected cash flows of the carrying value of the Bancorp’s portfolio loans and leases expected cash flows, excluding interest receivable, as of December 31, 2014:2016:

 

TABLE 58: PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES EXPECTED MATURITIES 
TABLE 68: PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES EXPECTED CASH FLOWS             

 
($ in millions)Less than 1 year    1-5 years     Over 5 years    Total    Less than 1 year   1-5 years   Over 5 years   Total           

 

Commercial and industrial loans

$                  23,653      16,371  741    40,765  $   22,633        17,561    1,482      41,676         

Commercial mortgage loans

 3,328      3,613  458    7,399     2,646        3,797    456      6,899         

Commercial construction loans

 847      1,183  39    2,069     1,290        2,576    37      3,903         

Commercial leases

 735      1,623  1,362    3,720     837        1,929    1,208      3,974         

Subtotal - commercial loans and leases

 28,563             22,790         2,600     53,953 

 

Total commercial loans and leases

    27,406        25,863    3,183      56,452         

 

Residential mortgage loans

 2,497      5,428  4,464           12,389          2,651        6,258    6,142      15,051         

Home equity

 1,203      3,460  4,223    8,886     971        1,465    5,259      7,695         

Automobile loans

 5,209      6,704  124    12,037     4,527        5,342    114      9,983         

Credit card

 481      1,920  -     2,401     447        1,790    -      2,237         

Other consumer loans and leases

 404      14  -     418     512        129    39      680         

Subtotal - consumer loans and leases

 9,794       17,526   8,811     36,131 

Total

$38,357       40,316   11,411     90,084 

 

Total consumer loans and leases

    9,108        14,984    11,554      35,646         

 

Total portfolio loans and leases

 $   36,514        40,847    14,737      92,098         

 

Additionally, the following table displays a summary of expected cash flows, excluding interest receivable, occurring after one year for both fixed and floating/adjustable rateadjustable-rate loans and leases as of December 31, 2014:2016:

 

TABLE 59: PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES PRINCIPAL CASH FLOWS OCCURING AFTER ONE YEAR 
TABLE 69: PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES EXPECTED CASH FLOWS OCCURRING AFTER 1 YEARTABLE 69: PORTFOLIO LOANS AND LEASES EXPECTED CASH FLOWS OCCURRING AFTER 1 YEAR
                         Interest  Rate                                                                       Interest Rate                                     
($ in millions)  Fixed   Floating or Adjustable         Fixed    Floating or Adjustable

Commercial and industrial loans

$ 2,672  14,440                   $     2,515                              16,528

Commercial mortgage loans

 1,031  3,040                  843                                3,410

Commercial construction loans

 31  1,191                  13                                2,600

Commercial leases

  2,985  -                  3,137                                        -

Subtotal - commercial loans and leases

  6,719  18,671             

Total commercial loans and leases

     6,508                              22,538

Residential mortgage loans

 7,031  2,861                  9,382                                3,018

Home equity

 736  6,947                  514                                6,210

Automobile loans

 6,783  45                  5,399                                     57

Credit card

 627  1,293                  543                                1,247

Other consumer loans and leases

 -   14                  22                                   146

Subtotal - consumer loans and leases

  15,177  11,160             

Total

$ 21,896  29,831             

Total consumer loans and leases

     15,860                              10,678

Total portfolio loans and leases

 $     22,368                              33,216

 

Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights and Interest Rate Risk

The net carrying amount of the residential MSR portfolio was $856$744 million and $967$784 million as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The value of servicing rights can fluctuate sharply depending on changes in interest rates and other factors. Generally, as interest rates decline and loans are prepaid to take advantage of refinancing, the total value of existing servicing rights declines because no further servicing fees are collected on repaid loans. The Bancorp maintains a non-qualifying hedging strategy relative to its mortgage banking activity in order to manage a portion of the risk associated with changes in the value of its MSR portfolio as a result of changing interest rates.

Mortgage rates decreased during the year ended December 31, 2014 which caused actual prepayments on the servicing portfolio to

increase. The increase in actual prepayments on the servicing portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2014 caused the modeled prepayment speeds to increase, which led to a temporary impairment of $65 million on servicing rights during the year ended December 31, 2014.        Mortgage rates increased during the year ended December 31, 20132016 which caused actual prepayments on the servicing portfolio to decrease. The decrease in actual prepayments on the servicing portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2013 caused the modeled prepayment speeds to decrease, which ledleading to a recovery of temporary impairment of $192 million on the servicing rights during the year ended December 31, 2013.

year. Servicing rights are deemed temporarily impaired when a borrower’s loan rate is distinctly higher than prevailing rates. Temporary impairment on servicing rights is reversed when the prevailing rates return to a level commensurate with the borrower’s loan rate. In addition to the MSR valuation, the Bancorp recognized net gains of $24 million and $90 million on derivatives associated with its non-qualifying hedging strategy during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

 

7584  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

prevailing rates return to a level commensurate with the borrower’s loan rate. In addition to the mortgage servicing rights valuation, the Bancorp recognized net gains of $95 million and net losses of $17 million on its non-qualifying hedging strategy for the years ended 2014 and 2013, respectively. These amounts include net gains on securities related to the Bancorp’s non-qualifying hedging strategy which were zero during 2014 and $13 million during 2013. The Bancorp may adjust its hedging strategy to reflect its assessment of the composition of its MSR portfolio, the cost of hedging and the anticipated effectiveness of the hedges given the economic environment. Refer to Note 1112 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on servicing rights and the instruments used to hedge interest rate risk on MSRs.

Foreign Currency Risk

The Bancorp may enter into foreign exchange derivative contracts to economically hedge certain foreign currency denominated loans. The

derivatives are classified as free-standing instruments with the revaluation gain or loss being recorded in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The balance of the Bancorp’s foreign denominated loans at December 31, 20142016 and December 31, 20132015 was $720$827 million and $581$812 million, respectively. The Bancorp also enters into foreign exchange contracts for the benefit of commercial customers involved in international trade to hedge their exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Similar to the hedging of interest rate risk from interest rate derivative contracts, the Bancorp also enters into foreign exchange contracts with major financial institutions to economically hedge a substantial portion of the exposure from client driven foreign exchange activity. The Bancorp has risk limits and internal controls in place to help ensure excessive

risk is not being taken in providing this service to customers. These controls include an independent determination of currency volatility and credit equivalent exposure on these contracts, counterparty credit approvals and country limits.limits performed by the Capital Markets Credit Department and Capital Markets Risk Department.

Commodity Risk

The Bancorp also enters into commodity contracts for the benefit of commercial customers to hedge their exposure to commodity price fluctuations. Similar to the hedging of foreign exchange and interest rate risk from interest rate derivative contracts, the Bancorp also enters into commodity contracts with major financial institutions to economically hedge a substantial portion of the exposure from client driven commodity activity. The Bancorp may also offset this risk with exchange traded commodity contracts. The Bancorp has risk limits and internal controls in place to help ensure excessive risk is not taken in providing this service to customers. These controls include an independent determination of commodity volatility and credit equivalent exposure on these contracts and counterparty credit approvals performed by the Capital Markets Credit Department and Capital Markets Risk Department.

 

 

LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT

The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand, unexpected levels of deposit withdrawals and other contractual obligations. Mitigating liquidity risk is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of cash, investment securities, maintaining sufficient unused borrowing capacity in the debt markets and delivering consistent growth in core deposits. A summary of certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts is included in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Bancorp maintains a contingency funding plan that assesses the liquidity needs under various scenarios of market conditions, asset growth and credit rating downgrades. The plan includes liquidity stress testing which measures various sources and uses of funds under the different scenarios. The contingency plan provides for ongoing monitoring of unused borrowing capacity and available sources of contingent liquidity to prepare for unexpected liquidity needs and to cover unanticipated events that could affect liquidity.

Sources of Funds

The Bancorp’s primary sources of funds relate to cash flows from loan and lease repayments, payments from securities related to sales and maturities, the sale or securitization of loans and leases and funds generated by core deposits, in addition to the use of public and private debt offerings.

ExpectedTable 68 of the Market Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A illustrates the expected maturities from loan and lease repayments are included in Table 58 of the Market Risk Management section of MD&A.repayments. Of the $22.4$31.2 billion of securities in the Bancorp’s available-for-sale and other portfolio at December 31, 2014, $3.32016, $4.1 billion in principal and interest is expected to be received in the next 12 months and an additional $3.5$3.3 billion is expected to be received in the next 13 to 24 months. For further information on the Bancorp’s securities portfolio, refer to the Investment Securities subsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

Asset-driven liquidity is provided by the Bancorp’s ability to sell or securitize loans and leases. In order to reduce the exposure to interest rate fluctuations and to manage liquidity, the Bancorp has developed securitization and sale procedures for several types of interest-sensitive

assets. A majority of the long-term, fixed-rate single-family residential mortgage loans underwritten according to FHLMC or FNMA guidelines are sold for cash upon origination. Additional assets such as certain other residential mortgages,mortgage loans, certain commercial loans, home equity loans, automobile loans and other consumer loans are also capable of being securitized or sold. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, theThe Bancorp sold or securitized loans totaling $9.4$7.4 billion and $23.4during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $6.4 billion respectively.

during the year ended December 31, 2015. For further information on the transfer of financial assets, refer to Note 1112 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Core deposits have historically provided the Bancorp with a sizeable source of relatively stable and low cost funds. The Bancorp’s average core deposits and average shareholders’ equity funded 82% of its average total assets during 2014for both years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013.December 31, 2015. In addition to core deposit funding, the Bancorp also accesses a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources, which include the use ofsecuritized advances from the FHLB system. Certificates of deposit with a balance of $100,000 or moreand over and deposits in the Bancorp’s foreign branch located in the Cayman Islands are wholesale funding tools utilized to fund asset growth. Management does not rely on any one source of liquidity and manages availability in response to changing balance sheet needs.

On February 25, 2014, the Bancorp issued and sold $500 million of unsecured senior fixed-rate notes. On June 5, 2014, The Bancorp issued in a registered public offering 300,000 depositary shares, representing 12,000 shares of 4.90% fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative Series J perpetual preferred stock, for net proceeds of $297 million. As of December 31, 2014, $3.02016, $8.9 billion of debt or other securities were available for issuance under the current Bancorp’s Board of Directors’ authorizations and the Bancorp is authorized to file any necessary registration statements with the SEC to permit ready access to the public securities markets; however, access to these markets may depend on market conditions. At December 31, 2014,2016, the Bancorp has approximately $41.7$42.3 billion of borrowing capacity available through secured borrowing sources including the FHLB and FRB.

In 2013, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary updated and amended its existingThe Bank’s global bank note program to increase thehas a borrowing capacity from $20of $25.0 billion, to $25 billion.of which $17.1 billion is available for issuance as of December 31, 2016. On April 25, 2014,March 15, 2016, the Bank issued and sold $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior bank notes. On September 5, 2014,June 14, 2016, the Bank issued and sold $850 million$1.3 billion of unsecured senior fixed-rate bank notes. The Bancorp has $19.1On September 27, 2016, the Bank issued and sold $1.0 billion of funding available for issuance under the globalunsecured bank note program as of December 31, 2014.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Bancorp transferred approximately $3.8 billion in consumer automobile loans to bankruptcy remote trusts which were deemed to be VIEs. The Bancorp concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of these VIEs and, therefore, has consolidated these VIEs. The assets of these VIEs are restricted to the settlement of the notes and other obligations of the VIEs. Third-party holders of the notes do not have recourse to the general assets of the Bancorp.notes.

 

 

76Fifth Third Bancorp

85  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio

A key reform within the Basel III framework to strengthen international liquidity standards was the BCBS’ introduction of the LCR and NSFR. On January 7, 2013, the BCBS issued a final standard for the LCR applicable to large internationally active banking organizations. The BCBS plans on implementingissued a final NSFR standard in the fourth quarter of 2014 and disclosure requirements in the second quarter of 2015 which are applicable to internationally active banks. The NSFR inwill become a minimum standard by January 1, 2018.

Section 165 of the DFA requires the FRB to establish enhanced liquidity standards in the U.S. for BHCs with total assets of $50 billion or greater. On October 10, 2014, the U.S. Banking Agenciesbanking agencies published final rules implementing a quantitative liquidity requirement consistent with the LCR standard established by the BCBS for large internationally active banking organizations, generally those with $250 billion or more in total consolidated assets or $10 billion or more in on-balance sheet foreign exposure. In addition, a modifiedModified LCR requirement was finalized for BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets that are not internationally active, such as Fifth Third.the Bancorp. The Modified LCR requires BHCs to maintain HQLA equal to its calculated net cash outflows over a 30 calendar-day stress period multiplied by a factor of 0.7. The modifiedModified LCR isbecame effective January 1, 2016 and requires BHCs to calculate its LCR on a monthly basis. The final rule includes a transition period for the modifiedModified LCR in which BHCs must maintain HQLA of 90% of its calculated net cash outflows for 2016 and then 100% beginning in 2017. The Bancorp estimates its

modifiedBancorp’s Modified LCR was 112%128% at December 31, 20142016 calculated under the modified LCR final rule. For more information on LCR, refer

The U.S. banking agencies have issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to implement a modified NSFR for certain bank holding companies with at least $50 billion but less than $250 billion in total consolidated assets and with less than $10 billion in on-balance sheet foreign exposures, including the Bancorp. The NSFR is designed to promote medium- and long-term stable funding of the assets and off-balance-sheet activities of banks and bank holding companies over a one-year time horizon. Generally consistent with the BCBS’ framework, under the proposed rule banking organizations would be required to hold an amount of ASF over a one-year time horizon that equals or exceeds the institution’s amount of RSF, with the ASF representing the numerator and the RSF representing the denominator of the NSFR. Banking

organizations subject to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures sectionmodified NSFR would multiply the RSF amount by 70%, such that the RSF amount required for these institutions would be equivalent to 70% of MD&A.the RSF amount that would be required pursuant to the full NSFR generally applicable to institutions with at least $250 billion in total consolidated assets or $10 billion or more in on-balance sheet foreign exposures under the proposed rule. The proposed rule includes detailed descriptions of the items that would comprise ASF and RSF and standardized factors that would apply to ASF and RSF items, and would require any institution whose applicable modified NSFR falls under 100% to notify the appropriate federal regulator and develop a remediation plan.

If ultimately adopted as currently proposed, the implementation of the NSFR could impact the Bancorp’s liquidity and funding requirements and practices in the future, including by incentivizing increased use of long-term debt as a funding source. Under the proposal, the NSFR becomes effective January 1, 2018 with public disclosure requirements beginning for the calendar quarter that ends on March 31, 2018. The comment period for this proposal ended on August 5, 2016. The Bancorp is currently evaluating the impact of the U.S. banking agencies’ NSFR framework.

Credit Ratings

The cost and availability of financing to the Bancorp and Bank are impacted by its credit ratings. A downgrade to the Bancorp’s or Bank’s credit ratings could affect its ability to access the credit markets and increase its borrowing costs, thereby adversely impacting the Bancorp’s or Bank’s financial condition and liquidity. Key factors in maintaining high credit ratings include a stable and diverse earnings stream, strong credit quality, strong capital ratios and diverse funding sources, in addition to disciplined liquidity monitoring procedures.

The Bancorp’s and Bank’s credit ratings are summarized in Table 60.70. The ratings reflect the ratings agenciesagency’s view on the Bancorp’s and Bank’s capacity to meet financial commitments.*

* As an investor, you should be aware that a security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, that it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization and that each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Additional information on the credit rating ranking within the overall classification system is located on the website of each credit rating agency.

 

TABLE 60:70: AGENCY RATINGS

As of February 25, 201524, 2017Moody’sStandard and Poor’sFitch  DBRS    
FitchDBRS       

Fifth Third Bancorp:

    

Short-term

No ratingA-2  A-2F1R-1L    

Senior debt

Baa1BBB+AAL    

Subordinated debt

Baa2Baa1BBBA-BBBH    

Fifth Third Bank:

Short-term

P-2P-1A-2F1R-1L    

Long-term deposit

A3Aa3No ratingA+A    

Senior debt

A3A-AA    

Subordinated debt

Baa1BBB+  BBB+A-  AL    

Rating Agency Outlook for Fifth Third Bancorp and Fifth Third Bank:

  A-Stable  StableAL      NegativeStable    

 

OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT

The Bancorp faces ongoing and emerging risks and regulations related to the activities that surround the delivery of banking and financial products. The Bancorp believes that effective management of operational risk plays a major role in both the level and the stability of profitability. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes people or systems or fromdue to external events. This includes, butevents that are neither market nor credit-related. Operational risk is not limitedinherent in the Bancorp’s activities and can manifest itself in various ways including fraudulent acts, business interruptions, inappropriate behavior of employees, unintentional failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, cyber-security incidents and privacy breaches or failure of vendors to perform in accordance

with their arrangements. These events could result in financial losses, litigation and regulatory fines, as well as other damage to the following typesBancorp. The Bancorp’s risk management goal is to keep operational risk at appropriate levels consistent with the Bancorp’s risk appetite, financial strength, the characteristics of risk:its businesses, the markets in which it operates and the competitive and regulatory environment to which it is subject.

86  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

To control, monitor and govern operational risk, the Bancorp maintains an overall Risk Management Framework which comprises governance oversight, risk assessment, capital measurement, monitoring and reporting as well as a formal three lines of defense approach. ERM is responsible for prescribing the framework to the lines of business continuityand corporate functions, and to provide independent oversight of its implementation (second line of defense). Business Controls groups are in place in each of the lines of business to ensure consistent implementation and execution of managing day to day operational risk information management risk, fraud risk, model risk, third party service provider risk, human resources risk, and process risk.(first line of defense).

The Bancorp’s risk management framework consists of five integrated components, including identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and independent governance reporting risks.of risk. The corporate Operational Risk Management function within Enterprise Risk is responsible for developing and overseeing the implementation of the Bancorp’s approach to managing operational

risk. This includes providing governance, awareness and training, tools, guidance and oversight to support

implementation of key risk programs and systems as they relate to operational risk management, such as risk and control self-assessments, new product/initiative risk reviews, key risk indicators, Vendor Risk Management and operational losses. The function is also responsible for developing reports that support the proactive management of operational risk across the enterprise. The lines of business and corporate functions are responsible for managing the operational risks associated with their areas in accordance with the risk management framework. The framework is intended to enable the Bancorp to function with a sound and well-controlled operational environment. These processes support the Bancorp’s goals to minimize future operational losses and strengthen the Bancorp’s performance by maintaining sufficient capital to absorb operational losses that are incurred.

 

COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT

Regulatory compliance risk is defined as the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, financial loss, or damage to reputation as a result of noncompliance with (i) applicable laws, regulations, rules and other regulatory requirements (including but not limited to the risk of consumers experiencing economic loss or other legal harm as a result of noncompliance with consumer protection laws, regulations and requirements); (ii) internal policies and procedures, standards of best practice or codes of conduct; and (iii) principles of integrity and fair dealing applicable to Fifth Third’s activities and functions. Fifth Third focuses on managing regulatory compliance risk in accordance with the Bancorp’s integrated risk management framework, which ensures consistent processes for identifying, assessing, managing, monitoring and reporting risks. The Bancorp’s risk management goal is to keep compliance risk at appropriate levels consistent with the Bancorp’s risk appetite.

The current regulatory environment, including heightened regulatory expectations and material changes in laws and regulations, increases compliance risk. To mitigate compliance risk, Compliance Risk Management provides independent oversight to ensure consistency and sufficiency in the execution of the program and ensures that lines of business, regions and support functions are adequately identifying, assessing and monitoring

compliance risks and adopting proper mitigation strategies. The lines of business and enterprise functions are responsible for managing the compliance risks associated with their areas. Additionally, Compliance Risk Management implements key compliance programs and processes including but not limited to risk assessments, key risk indicators, issues tracking, regulatory compliance testing and monitoring, anti-money laundering, privacy and oversees the Bancorp’s compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act.

Fifth Third also focuses on the reporting and escalation of compliance issues to senior management and the Board of Directors. The Management Compliance Committee is the key committee that oversees and supports Fifth Third in the management of compliance risk across the enterprise. The Management Compliance Committee oversees Fifth Third-wide compliance issues, industry best practices, legislative developments (in coordination with the Regulatory Change Management Committee), regulatory concerns and other leading indicators of compliance risk. The Management Compliance Committee reports to the ERMC, which reports to the Risk and Compliance Committee of the Board of Directors.

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Management regularly reviews the Bancorp’s capital levels to help ensure it is appropriately positioned under various operating environments. The Bancorp has established a Capital Committee which is responsible for making capital plan recommendations to management. These recommendations are reviewed by the ERM CommitteeERMC and the annual capital plan is approved by the Board of Directors. The Capital Committee is responsible for execution oversight of the capital actions of the capital plan.

Regulatory Capital Ratios

The U.S banking agenciesBasel III Final Rule was effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of its components and other provisions. It established quantitative measures that assign risk weightings to assets and off-balance sheet items and also definedefined and set minimum regulatory capital requirements. The minimum capital ratios established under the Basel III Final Rule are 4.5% for the CET1 capital ratio, 6% for the Tier I risk-based capital ratio, 8% for the Total risk-based capital ratio and 4% for the Tier I Leverage ratio (Tier I capital to quarterly average consolidated assets). The PCA provisions adopted by the U.S. banking agencies define “well-capitalized” ratios for CET1 capital, Tier I andrisk-based capital, Total risk-based

capital as 6% and Tier I leverage greater than or equal to 6.5%, 8%, 10% and 5%, respectively.

On January 1, 2016, the Bancorp became subject to a capital conservation buffer which will be phased in over a three-year period ending January 1, 2019. Once fully phased-in, the capital conservation buffer will be 2.5% in addition to the minimum capital requirements, in order to avoid limitations on certain capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. The capital conservation buffer is 0.625% in 2016. The Bancorp exceeded these “well-capitalized” and “capital conservation buffer” ratios for all periods presented.

The Basel II advanced approach framework was finalized by U.S. banking agencies in 2007. Core banks, defined as those with

77Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

consolidated total assets in excess of $250 billion or on balance sheet foreign exposures of $10 billion were required to adopt the advanced approach effective April 1, 2008.        The Bancorp doesmade a one-time permanent election to not meet these thresholds and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of Basel II.

The DFA requires more stringent prudential standards, including capital and liquidity requirements, for larger institutions. It addresses the quality of capital components by limiting the degree to which certain hybrid instruments can be included. The DFA will phase out the inclusion of certain TruPS as a component of Tier I risk-based capital when the Bancorp implements the revisedinclude AOCI in regulatory capital rules known as Basel III.

In December of 2010in the March 31, 2015 FFIEC 031 and revised in June of 2011, the BCBS issued Basel III, a global regulatory framework, to enhance international capital standards. In June of 2012, U.S. banking regulators proposed enhancements to the regulatory capital requirements for U.S. banks, which implement aspects of Basel III, such as re-defining the regulatory capital elements and minimum capital ratios, introducing regulatory capital buffers above those minimums, revising the agencies’ rules for calculating risk-weighted assets and introducing a new Tier I common equity ratio. In July of 2013, U.S. banking regulators approved final enhanced regulatory capital requirements (Basel III Final Rule), which included modifications to the proposed rules. The Basel III Final Rule provides for certain banks, including the Bancorp, to opt out of including AOCI in Tier I capital and retain the treatment of residential mortgage exposures consistent with the current Basel I capital rules.FR Y-9C filings. The Basel III Final Rule phases out the inclusion of certain TruPS as a component of Tier I capital. Under these provisions, these TruPS would qualify as a component of Tier II capital. At December 31, 20142016, the Bancorp’s TruPS no longer qualified for Tier I capital, included $60compared to $13 million,

of TruPS representing approximately 5 bps or 1 bp of risk-weighted assets. The Basel III Final Rule is effective for the Bancorpassets, which qualified as of January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of its components and other provisions.

The Bancorp’s current estimate of the pro-forma fully phased in Tier I common equity ratiocapital at December 31, 2014 under2015.

87  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table summarizes the Basel III Final Rule is approximately 9.39% compared with 9.65% as calculated under the existing Basel I capital framework. The primary drivers of the change from the existing Basel I capital framework to the Basel III Final Rule are an increase in Tier I common equity of approximately 74 bps (primarily from the elimination of the current 10% deduction of mortgage servicing rights from capital), which would be more than offset by the impact of increases in risk-weighted assets (primarily from the treatment of securitizations, mortgage servicing rights and commitments with an original maturity of one year or less). If the Bancorp elected to include AOCI components in capital, the December 31, 2014 pro forma Basel III Final Rule Tier I common ratio would have increased by approximately 35 bps. The pro-forma Tier I common equity ratio exceeds the proposed minimum Tier I common equity ratio of 7% comprised of a minimum of 4.5% plus a capital conservation buffer of 2.5%. The pro-forma Tier I common equity ratio does not include the effect of any mitigating actions the Bancorp may undertake to offset the impact of the proposed capital enhancements. Additionally, pursuant to the Basel III Final Rule, the minimumBancorp’s capital ratios as of January 1, 2015 are 6% for the Tier I capital ratio, 8% for the Total risk-based capital ratio and 4% for the Tier I capital to average consolidated assets (leverage ratio). For further discussion on the Basel I and Basel III Tier I common equity ratios, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.December 31:

TABLE 61: CAPITAL RATIOS                                            
As of December 31 ($ in millions)  2014         2013        2012        2011        2010            

Average equity as a percent of average assets

   11.59 %     11.56      11.65      11.41      12.22          

Tangible equity as a percent of tangible assets(a)

   9.41     9.44      9.17      9.03      10.42          

Tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets(a)

   8.43     8.63      8.83      8.68      7.04          

Tier I capital

  $          12,764     12,094      11,685      12,503      13,965          

Total risk-based capital

   16,895            16,431             15,811             16,876             18,178          

Risk-weighted assets(b)

   117,878     115,969      109,301      104,219      100,561          

Regulatory capital ratios:

                 

Tier I risk-based capital

   10.83 %     10.43      10.69      12.00      13.89          

Total risk-based capital

   14.33     14.17      14.47      16.19      18.08          

Tier I leverage

   9.66     9.73      10.15      11.25      12.79          

Tier I common equity(a)

   9.65        9.45         9.54         9.41         7.48          

TABLE 71: CAPITAL RATIOS 

 

 
($ in millions)   2016  2015  2014  2013    2012     

 

 

Average total Bancorp shareholders’ equity as a percent of average assets

   11.67    11.33  (f)   11.59  (f)   11.56  (f)   11.65  (f) 

Tangible equity as a percent of tangible assets(a)(d)

   9.82     9.55      9.41      9.44       9.17     

Tangible common equity as a percent of tangible assets(a)(d)

   8.87     8.59      8.43      8.63       8.83     
    Basel III
            Transitional
(b)            
  Basel I(c) 

CET1 capital

 

$

  12,426     11,917       N/A       N/A       N/A     

Tier I capital

   13,756     13,260       12,764       12,094       11,685     

Total regulatory capital

   17,972     17,134       16,895       16,431       15,811     

Risk-weighted assets

   119,632     121,290   (e)   117,878   (e)   115,969   (e)   109,301  (e) 

Regulatory capital ratios:

      

CET1 capital

   10.39    9.82   (e)   N/A       N/A       N/A     

Tier I risk-based capital

   11.50     10.93   (e)   10.83   (e)   10.43   (e)   10.69   (e) 

Total risk-based capital

   15.02     14.13   (e)   14.33   (e)   14.17   (e)   14.47   (e) 

Tier I leverage (to quarterly average assets)

   9.90     9.54   (e)   9.66   (e)   9.73   (e)   10.15   (e) 
    Basel III
Fully Phased-In
    

CET1 capital(a)

           10.29    9.72   (e)   N/A       N/A       N/A     

 

 
(a)

These are non-GAAP measures. For further information, on these ratios, refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A.

(b)

Under the U.S. banking agencies’ risk-based capital guidelines,Basel III Final Rule, assets and credit equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet exposures are assignedcalculated according to broad risk categories. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is multiplied by the associated risk weight of the category.standardized approach for risk-weighted assets. The resulting weighted values are added together resulting in the Bancorp’s total risk-weighted assets.

(c)

These capital amounts and ratios were calculated under the Supervisory Agencies general risk-based capital rules (Basel I) which were in effect prior to January 1, 2015.

(d)

Excludes unrealized gains and losses.

(e)

Balances and ratios not restated for the adoption of the amended guidance of ASU 2015-03 “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” Refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

(f)

Upon adoption of ASU 2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $33, $34, $28 and $52, respectively, of average debt issuance costs from average other assets to average long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Preferred Stock OfferingStress Tests and ConversionCCAR

As contemplatedIn 2011 the FRB adopted the capital plan rule, which requires BHCs with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more to submit annual capital plans to the FRB for review. Under the rule, these capital plans must include detailed descriptions of the following: the BHC’s internal processes for assessing capital adequacy; the policies governing capital actions such as common stock issuances, dividends and share repurchases; and all planned capital actions over a nine-quarter planning horizon. Further, each BHC must also report to the FRB the results of stress tests conducted by the 2013BHC under a number of scenarios that assess the sources and uses of capital under baseline and stressed economic scenarios. The FRB launched the 2016 stress testing program and CCAR on May 16, 2013January 28, 2016, with submissions of stress test results and capital plans to the FRB due on April 5, 2016, which the Bancorp issuedsubmitted as required. Refer to Note 3 and Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion on the FRB’s review of the capital plan, the FRB’s non-objection to the Bancorp’s proposed capital actions and the Bancorp’s capital actions taken in a registered public offering 600,000 depositary shares, representing 24,000 shares of 5.10% fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative Series H perpetual preferred stock, for net proceeds of $593 million. Each preferred share has a $25,000 liquidation preference. The preferred stock accrues dividends, on a non-cumulative semi-annual basis, at an annual rate of 5.10% through but excluding June 30, 2023, at which time it converts to a quarterly floating rate dividend of three-month LIBOR plus 3.033%. Subject to any required regulatory approval, the Bancorp may redeem the Series H preferred shares at its option in whole or in part, at any time on or after June 30, 2023 and may redeem in whole, but not in part, following a regulatory capital event at any time prior to June 30,2016.

2023. The Series H preferred shares are not convertible into Bancorp common shares or any other securities.

On June 11, 2013, the Bancorp’s Board of Directors authorized the conversion into common stock, no par value, of all outstanding shares of the Bancorp’s 8.50% non-cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock, Series G, which shares are represented by depositary shares each representing 1/250th of a share of Series G preferred stock, pursuant to the Amended Articles of Incorporation. The Articles grant the Bancorp the right, at its option, to convert all outstanding shares of Series G preferred stock if the closing price of common stock exceeded 130% of the applicable conversion price for 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days. The closing price of shares of common stock satisfied such threshold for the 30 trading days ended June 10, 2013, and the

78  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Bancorp gave the required notice of its exercise of its conversion right.

On July 1, 2013, the Bancorp converted the remaining 16,442 outstanding shares of Series G preferred stock, which represented 4,110,500 depositary shares, into shares of Fifth Third’s common stock. Each share of Series G preferred stock was converted into 2,159.8272 shares of common stock, representing a total of 35,511,740 issued shares. The common shares issued in the conversion are exempt securities pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the securities exchanged were exclusively with Bancorp’s existing security holders where no commission or other remuneration was paid. Upon conversion, the depositary shares were delisted from the NASDAQ Global Select Market and withdrawn from the Exchange.

On December 9, 2013, the Bancorp issued, in a registered public offering, 18,000,000 depositary shares, representing 18,000 shares of 6.625% fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative Series I perpetual preferred stock, for net proceeds of $441 million. Each preferred share has a $25,000 liquidation preference. The preferred stock accrues dividends, on a non-cumulative quarterly basis, at an annual rate of 6.625% through but excluding December 31, 2023, at which time it converts to a quarterly floating rate dividend of three-month LIBOR plus 3.71%. Subject to any required regulatory approval, the Bancorp may redeem the Series I preferred shares at its option in whole or in part, at any time on or after December 31, 2023 and may redeem in whole, but not in part, following a regulatory capital event at any time prior to December 31, 2023. The Series I preferred shares are not convertible into Bancorp common shares or any other securities.

As contemplated by the 2014 CCAR, on June 5, 2014, the Bancorp issued in a registered public offering 300,000 depositary shares, representing 12,000 shares of 4.90% fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative Series J perpetual preferred stock, for net proceeds of $297 million. Each preferred share has a $25,000 liquidation preference. The preferred stock accrues dividends, on a non-cumulative semi-annual basis, at an annual rate of 4.90% through but excluding September 30, 2019, at which time it converts to a quarterly floating rate dividend of three-month LIBOR plus

3.129%. Subject to any required regulatory approval, the Bancorp may redeem the Series J preferred shares at its option in whole or in part, at any time on or after September 30, 2019, or at any time following a regulatory capital event. The Series J preferred shares are not convertible into Bancorp common shares or any other securities.

Redemption of TruPS

The Bancorp redeemed all $750 million of the outstanding TruPS issued by Fifth Third Capital Trust IV on December 30, 2013. These securities had a distribution rate of 6.50% and a scheduled maturity date of April 1, 2067. Pursuant to the terms of the TruPS, the securities of Fifth Third Capital Trust IV were redeemable within ninety days of a Capital Treatment Event. The Bancorp determined that a Capital Treatment Event occurred upon the publication of a Final Rule regarding Regulatory Capital Rules jointly by the Federal Reserve System and the OCC. The redemption price was $1,000 per security, which reflected 100% of the liquidation amount, plus accrued and unpaid distributions to the actual redemption date of $10 million. The Bancorp recognized an $8 million loss on the extinguishment of this debt within other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Dividend Policy and Stock Repurchase Program

The Bancorp’s common stock dividend policy and stock repurchase program reflect its earnings outlook, desired payout ratios, the need to maintain adequate capital levels, the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends, the need to comply with safe and sound banking practices as well as meet regulatory requirements and expectations. The Bancorp declared dividends per common share of $0.51$0.53 and $0.47$0.52 during the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The Bancorp entered into or settled a number of accelerated share repurchase transactions during the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015. Refer to the Overview section of MD&A and Note 23 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the accelerated share repurchase transactions.repurchases.

 

The following table summarizes shares authorized for repurchase for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

88  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

TABLE 62: SHARE REPURCHASES               
For the years ended December 312014        2013        2012               

Shares authorized for repurchase at January 1

 43,071,613  63,046,682  19,201,518       ��    

Additional authorizations(a) (b)

 64,908,628             45,541,057         86,269,178            

Share repurchases(c)

 (34,799,873    (65,516,126    (42,424,014)            

Shares authorized for repurchase at December 31

 73,180,368     43,071,613     63,046,682            

Average price paid per share

 $ 20.87     $ 18.80     $ 14.82            

The following table summarizes shares authorized for repurchase as part of publicly announced plans or programs:

 

 

TABLE 72: SHARE REPURCHASES 

 

 
For the years ended December 31   2016           2015         

 

 

Shares authorized for repurchase at January 1

            30,572,513             73,180,368  

Additional authorizations(a)

   85,702,105      

Share repurchases(b)

   (34,633,221)    (42,607,855) 

 

 

Shares authorized for repurchase at December 31

   81,641,397     30,572,513  

 

 

Average price paid per share(b)

 

$

  18.86     19.60  

 

 
(a)

In March 2014,2016, the Bancorp announced that its Board of Directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the Bancorp’s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction. The authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date. This share repurchase authorization replaces the Board’s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 3514 million shares remained available for repurchase by the Bancorp.

(b)

In March 2013, the Bancorp announced that its Board of Directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the Bancorp’s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction. The authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date. This share repurchase authorization replaces the Board’s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the Bancorp.

(c)

Excludes2,116,3702,430,179, 1,863,097 and 2,059,0031,930,233 shares repurchased during the years ended2014December 31, 2016, 2013 and 2012,2015, respectively, in connection with various employee compensation plans. These repurchasespurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid per share and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the Board of Directors’ authorization.

 

Stress Tests and CCAR

In 2011, the FRB adopted the capital plan rule, which requires BHCs with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more to submit annual capital plans to the FRB for review. Under the rule, these capital plans must included detailed descriptions of the following: the BHC’s internal processes for assessing capital adequacy; the policies governing capital actions such as common stock issuances, dividends, and share repurchases; and all planned capital actions

over a nine-quarter planning horizon. Further, each BHC must also report to the FRB the results of stress tests conducted by the BHC under a number of scenarios that assess the sources and uses of capital under baseline and stressed economic scenarios. The FRB launched the 2014 stress testing program and CCAR on November 1, 2013, with firm submissions of stress test results and capital plans due to the FRB on January 6, 2014, which the Bancorp submitted as required. Refer to Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial

7989  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements for a discussion on the FRB’s review of the capital plan, the FRB’s non-objection to the Bancorp’s proposed capital actions and the Bancorp’s capital actions taken in 2014.

The BHCs that participated in the 2014 CCAR, including the Bancorp, are required to conduct mid-cycle company-run stress tests using data as of March 31, 2014. The stress tests must be based on three BHC defined scenarios – baseline, adverse and severely adverse. As required, the Bancorp reported the mid-cycle stress test results to the FRB on July 7, 2014. In addition, the Bancorp published a Form 8-K providing a summary of the results under the severely adverse scenario on September 18, 2014, which is available on Fifth Third’s website athttps://www.53.com. These results represented estimates of the Bancorp’s results from the second quarter of 2014 through the second quarter of 2016 under the severely adverse scenario, which is considered highly unlikely to occur.

The FRB launched the 2015 stress testing program and CCAR on October 23, 2014. The stress testing results and capital plan were submitted by the Bancorp to the FRB on January 5, 2015.

The FRB expects to release summary results of the 2015 stress testing program and CCAR in March of 2015. The results will include supervisory projections of capital ratios, losses and revenues under the supervisory adverse and supervisory severely adverse scenarios. The FRB will also issue an objection or non-objection to each participating institution’s capital plan submitted under CCAR. The FRB’s summary results will also include an overview of methodologies used for supervisory tests. Additionally, as a CCAR institution, Fifth Third is required to disclose its own estimates of results under the supervisory severely adverse scenario using the same consistently applied capital actions noted above, and to provide information related to risks included in its stress testing; a summary description of the methodologies used; estimates of aggregate pre-provision net revenue, losses, provisions, and pro forma capital ratios at the end of the forward-looking planning horizon of at least nine quarters; and an explanation of the most significant causes of changes in regulatory capital ratios. These disclosures are required to be sent to the FRB and publicly disclosed within 15 days of the date the FRB discloses the results of its DFA supervisory stress test.

80  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Bancorp enters into financial transactions that are consideredoff-balance sheet arrangements as they involve varying elements of market, credit and liquidity risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bancorp’soff-balance sheet arrangements include commitments, contingent liabilities, guarantees and transactions withnon-consolidated VIEs. A brief discussion of these transactions is as follows:

Commitments

The Bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts, including commitments to extend credit, letters of credit, forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage loans, noncancelable operating lease obligations, capital commitments for private equity investments, purchase obligations, capital expenditures, and purchasecapital lease obligations. Refer to Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on commitments.

Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

For certain mortgage loans originated by the Bancorp, borrowers may beare required to obtain PMI provided by third-party insurers. In some instances, these insurers cedeceded a portion of the PMI premiums to the Bancorp, and the Bancorp providesprovided reinsurance coverage within a specified range of the total PMI coverage. The Bancorp’s reinsurance coverage typically rangesranged from 5% to 10% of the total PMI coverage. The Bancorp’s maximum exposure in the event of nonperformance by the underlying borrowers is equivalent to the Bancorp’s total outstanding reinsurance coverage, which was $29$27 million at December 31, 2014 and $37 million at December 31, 2013.2015. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013,2015 the Bancorp maintained a reserve of $2 million and $10 million, respectively, related to exposures within the reinsurance portfolio which was included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The changeSheet. In the second quarter of 2016, the Bancorp allowed one of

its third-party insurers to terminate its reinsurance agreement with the Bancorp, resulting in the Bancorp releasing collateral to the insurer in the form of investment securities and other assets with a carrying value of $6 million, and the insurer assuming the Bancorp’s obligations under the reinsurance agreement, resulting in a decrease to the Bancorp’s reserve was due toliability of $2 million and a decrease in both the outstandingBancorp’s maximum exposure and expected losses. During 2009,of $26 million. In addition, the Bancorp suspendedreceived a payment of $4 million related to the practicedifference between the release of providingthe assets and the reserve liability assumed. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the final policies under the reinsurance agreement were terminated and as of PMI for newly originated mortgage loans.December 31, 2016 the Bancorp no longer had any remaining exposure or reserves related to exposure within the reinsurance portfolio.

The Bancorp has performance obligations upon the occurrence of certain events provided in certain contractual arrangements, including residential mortgage loans sold with representation and warranty provisions or credit recourse. Refer to Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on guarantees and contingent liabilities.

Transactions withNon-consolidated VIEs

The Bancorp engages in a variety of activities that involve VIEs, which are legal entities that lack sufficient equity to finance their activities, or the equity investors of the entities as a group lack any of the characteristics of a controlling interest. The investments in those entities in which the Bancorp was determined not to be the primary beneficiary but holds a variable interest in the entity are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or other accounting standards as appropriate and not consolidated. Refer to Note 1011 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information onnon-consolidated VIEs.

 

8190  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

 

The Bancorp has certain obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts. The aggregate contractual obligations and commitments at December 31, 20142016 are shown in Table 63.73. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Bancorp has unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the

effective tax rate in future periods. Due to the uncertainty of the amounts to be

ultimately paid as well as the timing of such payments, all uncertain tax liabilities that have not been paid have been excluded from the Contractual Obligations and Other Commitmentsfollowing table. For further detail on the impact of income taxes, refer to Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

TABLE 63: CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS 
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)

  Less than 1  

year

 1-3 years 3-5 years Greater than
5 years
 Total 
TABLE 73: CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTSTABLE 73: CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS                 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  Less than 1 
year
   1-3 years     3-5 years     Greater than
5 years
   Total   

 

Contractually obligated payments due by period:

          

Deposits with a stated maturity of less than one year(a)

$          94,857  -   -   -   94,857 

Deposits with no stated maturity(a)

  $            97,577    -    -    -    97,577 

Long-term debt(b)

   1,156    5,924    3,839    3,469    14,388 

Time deposits(c)

 2,507  2,578  1,510  260  6,855    2,173    2,782    1,274    15    6,244 

Short-term borrowings(e)

 1,700  -   -   -   1,700    3,667    -    -    -    3,667 

Long-term debt(b)

 702  6,499  3,649  4,117  14,967 

Forward contracts related to held for sale mortgage loans(d)

 999  -   -   -   999 

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale(d)

   1,823    -    -    -    1,823 

Noncancelable operating lease obligations(f)

 92  166  145  294  697    88    161    117    210    576 

Partnership investment commitments(g)

 191  118  24  31  364    182    102    36    37    357 

Pension benefit payments(i)

 22  40  34  80  176    18    33    32    77    160 

Purchase obligations and capital expenditures(h)

 51  26  28  -   105    49    34    3    -    86 

Capital lease obligations

 11  14  10  2  37    6    11    1    1    19 

 

Total contractually obligated payments due by period

$101,132  9,441  5,400  4,784      120,757   $106,739    9,047    5,302    3,809    124,897  

Other commitments by expiration period

 

Other commitments by expiration period:

          

Commitments to extend credit(j)

$26,540          12,105          17,602  7,658  63,905   $29,355    15,388    15,702    7,523    67,968 

Letters of credit(k)

 2,181  1,160  590  43  3,974    1,387    814    350    32    2,583 

 

Total other commitments by expiration period

$28,721  13,265  18,192  7,701  67,879   $30,742    16,202    16,052    7,555    70,551  

 
(a)

Includes demand, interest checking, savings, money market and foreign office deposits. For additional information, refer to the Deposits discussion insubsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

(b)

Interest-bearing obligations are principally used to fund interest-earning assets. As such, interest charges on contractual obligations were excluded from reported amounts, as the potential cash outflows would have corresponding cash inflows from interest-earning assets. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these debt instruments.

(c)

Includes other time deposits and certificates $100,000 and over. For additional information, refer to the Deposits discussion insubsection of the Balance Sheet Analysis section of MD&A.

(d)

Refer to Note 1213 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on forward contracts to sell residential mortgage loans.

(e)

Includes federal funds purchased and borrowings with an original maturity of less than one year. For additional information, refer to Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(f)

Includes rental commitments.

(g)

Includeslow-income housing and historic tax investments. For additional information, refer to Note 1011 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(h)

Represents agreements to purchase goods or services and includes commitments to various general contractors for work related to banking center construction.

(i)

Refer to Note 21 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on pension obligations.

(j)

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend, typically having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. Many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. The total commitment amounts include capital commitments for private equity investments and do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. For additional information, refer to Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(k)

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. For additional information, refer to Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

8291  Fifth Third Bancorp


MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT AS TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Bancorp conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Bancorp’s management, including the Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act)Act of 1934). The disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Bancorp files and submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and information is accumulated and communicated to management on a timely basis. Based on the foregoing,evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Bancorp’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosedbecause of deficiencies in the reportsBancorp’s policies and procedures relating to the Bancorp filesregistration of, and submits underprospectus delivery with respect to, the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarizedBancorp’s employee benefit plans as described in Part II, Item 5 (Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and reported as and when required and information is accumulated and communicated to management on a timely basis.Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities).

MANAGEMENT’S ASSESSMENT AS TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Fifth Third Bancorp is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Bancorp’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2016. Management’s assessment is based on the criteria established in theInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and was designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Bancorp maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2016. Based on this assessment, management believes that the Bancorp maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2016. The Bancorp’s independent registered public accounting firm, that audited the Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, has issued an audit report on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2016. This report appears on page 8493 of the annual report.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS

The Bancorp’s management also conducted an evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the year covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, there has been no such change during the year covered by this report.

 

LOGO

LOGO

LOGOGreg D. CarmichaelLOGOTayfun Tuzun

Kevin T. Kabat

Tayfun Tuzun

Vice ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

February 25, 2015

24, 2017

February 25, 2015

24, 2017

 

8392  Fifth Third Bancorp


REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Fifth Third Bancorp:

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Fifth Third Bancorp and subsidiaries (the “Bancorp”) as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Bancorp’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment as to the Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Bancorp maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control— Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20142016 of the Bancorp and our report dated February 25, 201524, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

LOGO

LOGO

Cincinnati, Ohio

February 24, 2017

Cincinnati, Ohio

February 25, 201593  Fifth Third Bancorp


REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Fifth Third Bancorp:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Fifth Third Bancorp and subsidiaries (the “Bancorp”) as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014.2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Bancorp’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fifth Third Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014,2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 201524, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

LOGO

Cincinnati, Ohio

February 25, 2015

84LOGO

Cincinnati, Ohio
February 24, 2017

94  Fifth Third Bancorp


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

As of December 31 ($ in millions, except share data)2014 2013   2016 2015

Assets

   

Cash and due from banks(a)

$                      3,091  3,178   $2,392  2,540    

Available-for-sale and other securities(b)

 22,408  18,597    31,183  29,044    

Held-to-maturity securities(c)

 187  208    26  70    

Trading securities

 360  343    410  386    

Other short-term investments

 7,914  5,116    2,754  2,671    

Loans held for sale(d)

 1,261  944    751  903    

Portfolio loans and leases:

Commercial and industrial loans

 40,765  39,316 

Commercial mortgage loans(a)

 7,399  8,066 

Commercial construction loans

 2,069  1,039 

Commercial leases

 3,720  3,625 

Residential mortgage loans(e)

 12,389  12,680 

Home equity

 8,886  9,246 

Automobile loans(a)

 12,037  11,984 

Credit card

 2,401  2,294 

Other consumer loans and leases

 418  364 

Portfolio loans and leases

 90,084  88,614 

Portfolio loans and leases(a)(e)

   92,098  92,582    

Allowance for loan and lease losses(a)

 (1,322 (1,582   (1,253 (1,272)   

Portfolio loans and leases, net

 88,762  87,032    90,845  91,310    

Bank premises and equipment

 2,465  2,531 

Bank premises and equipment(f)

   2,065  2,239    

Operating lease equipment

 728  730    738  707    

Goodwill

 2,416  2,416    2,416  2,416    

Intangible assets

 15  19    9  12    

Servicing rights

 858  971    744  785    

Other assets(a)

 8,241  8,358    7,844  7,965 (j)

Total Assets

$138,706  130,443   $142,177              141,048 (j)

Liabilities

   

Deposits:

   

Demand

$34,809  32,634 

Interest checking

 26,800  25,875 

Savings

 15,051  17,045 

Money market

 17,083  11,644 

Other time

 3,960  3,530 

Certificates - $100,000 and over

 2,895  6,571 

Foreign office

 1,114  1,976 

Total deposits

 101,712  99,275 

Noninterest-bearing deposits

  $35,782  36,267    

Interest-bearing deposits

   68,039  66,938    

Total deposits(g)

   103,821  103,205    

Federal funds purchased

 144  284    132  151    

Other short-term borrowings

 1,556  1,380    3,535  1,507    

Accrued taxes, interest and expenses

 2,020  1,758    1,800  2,164    

Other liabilities(a)

 2,642  3,487    2,269  2,341    

Long-term debt(a)

 14,967  9,633    14,388  15,810 (j)

Total Liabilities

 123,041  115,817   $            125,945  125,178 (j)

Equity

   

Common stock(f)

 2,051  2,051 

Preferred stock(g)

 1,331  1,034 

Common stock(h)

  $2,051  2,051    

Preferred stock(i)

��  1,331  1,331    

Capital surplus

 2,646  2,561    2,756  2,666    

Retained earnings

 11,141  10,156    13,441  12,358    

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 429  82    59  197    

Treasury stock(f)

 (1,972 (1,295

Treasury stock(h)

   (3,433 (2,764)   

Total Bancorp shareholders’ equity

 15,626  14,589   $16,205  15,839    

Noncontrolling interests

 39  37    27  31    

Total Equity

 15,665  14,626    16,232  15,870    

Total Liabilities and Equity

$138,706  130,443   $142,177  141,048 (j)

(a)

AtIncludesDecember 31, 2014$85 and 2013, includes $179 and $49$152 of cash and due from banks,$471,216and $2,537 of portfolio loans and leases,$(26) and $48 of commercial mortgage loans,$3,331and $1,010 of automobile loans,$(22) and $(15)$(28) of ALLL,$259 and $13$14 of other assets,$53 and $1$3 of other liabilities and$3,4341,094and $1,048$2,487 of long-term debt from consolidated VIEs that are included in their respective captions.captions above atDecember 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For further information, refer to Note 10.11.

(b)

Amortized cost of$21,67731,024and $18,409$28,678 atDecember 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

(c)

Fair value of$18726and $208$70 atDecember 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

(d)

Includes$561686and $890$519 of residential mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value atDecember 31, 20142016, and 2013,2015, respectively.

(e)

Includes$108143and $92 $167of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value atDecember 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

(f)

Includes$39 and $81 of bank premises and equipment held for sale atDecember 31, 2016and 2015, respectively. For further information refer to Note 7.

(g)

Includes$0 and $628 of deposits held for sale atDecember 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(h)

Common shares: Stated value $2.22 per share; authorized 2,000,000;2 billion; outstanding atDecember December 31, 20142016824,046,952 (excludes 99,845,629 750,479,299(excludes 173,413,282treasury shares),and December 31, 20132015855,305,745785,080,314 (excludes 68,586,836138,812,267 treasury shares).

(g)(i)

446,000 and 458,000 shares of undesignated no par value preferred stock are authorized and unissued at December 31, 20142016and December 31, 2013, respectively; 2015;fixed-to-floating ratenon-cumulative Series H perpetual preferred stock with a $25,000 liquidation preference:24,000authorized shares,issued and outstanding at December 31, 20142016and December 31, 2013; 2015;fixed-to-floating ratenon-cumulative Series I perpetual preferred stock with a $25,000 liquidation preference:18,000authorized shares, issued and outstanding atDecember 31, 20142016and December 31, 2013;2015; andfixed-to-floating ratenon-cumulative Series J perpetual preferred stock with a $25,000 liquidation preference:12,000 authorized shares, issuesissued and outstanding atDecember 31, 20142016.and 2015.

(j)

Upon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $34 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information refer to Note 1.

RSeeefer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

85  Fifth Third Bancorp

95  Fifth Third Bancorp


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions, except share data)2014 2013 2012  2016             2015                          2014              

Interest Income

   

Interest and fees on loans and leases

$                    3,298  3,447  3,574  $3,233  3,151  3,298 

Interest on securities

 724  520  529   952  869  724 

Interest on other short-term investments

 8  6  4   8  8  8 

Total interest income

 4,030  3,973  4,107   4,193  4,028  4,030 

Interest Expense

   

Interest on deposits

 202  202  216   205  186  202 

Interest on federal funds purchased

  2  1   - 

Interest on other short-term borrowings

 2  6  8   10  2  2 

Interest on long-term debt

 247  204  288   361  306  247 

Total interest expense

 451  412  512   578  495  451 

Net Interest Income

 3,579  3,561  3,595   3,615  3,533  3,579 

Provision for loan and lease losses

 315  229  303   343  396  315 

Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan and Lease Losses

 3,264  3,332  3,292   3,272  3,137  3,264 

Noninterest Income

   

Service charges on deposits

 560  549  522   558  563  560 

Corporate banking revenue

 430  400  413   432  384  430 

Investment advisory revenue

 407  393  374 

Wealth and asset management revenue

  404  418  407 

Card and processing revenue

  319  302  295 

Mortgage banking net revenue

 310  700  845   285  348  310 

Card and processing revenue

 295  272  253 

Other noninterest income

 450  879  574   688  979  450 

Securities gains, net

 21  21  15   10  9  21 

Securities gains, net - non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

 -  13  3 

Total noninterest income

 2,473  3,227  2,999   2,696  3,003  2,473 

Noninterest Expense

   

Salaries, wages and incentives

 1,449  1,581  1,607   1,612  1,525  1,449 

Employee benefits

 334  357  371   339  323  334 

Net occupancy expense

 313  307  302   299  321  313 

Technology and communications

 212  204  196   234  224  212 

Card and processing expense

 141  134  121   132  153  141 

Equipment expense

 121  114  110   118  124  121 

Other noninterest expense

 1,139  1,264  1,374   1,169  1,105  1,139 

Total noninterest expense

 3,709  3,961  4,081   3,903  3,775  3,709 

Income Before Income Taxes

 2,028  2,598  2,210   2,065  2,365  2,028 

Applicable income tax expense

 545  772  636   505  659  545 

Net Income

 1,483  1,826  1,574   1,560  1,706  1,483 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 2  (10 (2  (4 (6 2 

Net Income Attributable to Bancorp

 1,481  1,836  1,576   1,564  1,712  1,481 

Dividends on preferred stock

 67  37  35   75  75  67 

Net Income Available to Common Shareholders

$1,414  1,799  1,541  $1,489  1,637  1,414 

Earnings per share - basic

$1.68  2.05  1.69  $1.95  2.03  1.68 

Earnings per share - diluted

$1.66  2.02  1.66  $1.93  2.01  1.66 

Average common shares outstanding - basic

 833,116,349  869,462,977  904,425,226   757,432,291  798,628,173  833,116,349 

Average common shares outstanding - diluted

 842,967,356  894,736,445  945,554,102           764,495,353  807,658,669  842,967,356 

Cash dividends declared per common share

$0.51  0.47  0.36  $0.53  0.52  0.51 

RSeeefer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

8696  Fifth Third Bancorp


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014 2013 2012 

Net income

$                 1,483  1,826  1,574 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities arising during the year

 378  (295 (63

Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income

 (24 4  (10

Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives:

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during the year

 39  (8 24 

Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

 (29 (29 (54

Defined benefit pension plans:

Net actuarial (loss) gain arising during the year

 (25 25  (5

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

 8  10  13 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 347  (293 (95

Comprehensive income

 1,830  1,533  1,479 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 2  (10 (2

Comprehensive income attributable to Bancorp

$1,828  1,543  1,481 

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)            2016                   2015                     2014         

 

 

Net Income

 

$

           1,560             1,706               1,483  

Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, Net of Tax:

         

Unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities:

         

Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during the year

    (130)    (227)      378  

Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

    (7)    (10)      (24) 

Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives:

         

Unrealized holding gains arising during the year

    19     48       39  

Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

    (31)    (49)      (29) 

Defined benefit pension plans, net:

         

Net actuarial loss arising during the year

    (1)    (5)      (25) 

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

    12     11        

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

    (138)    (232)      347  

 

 

Comprehensive Income

    1,422     1,474       1,830  

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (4)    (6)       

 

 

Comprehensive Income Attributable to Bancorp

 

$

   1,426     1,480       1,828  

 

 

RSeeefer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

8797  Fifth Third Bancorp


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

 

     
  Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity     
          Accumulated    Total     
          Other   Bancorp Non-   
  Common    Preferred  Capital   Retained  Comprehensive  Treasury  Shareholders’  Controlling Total     
($ in millions, except per share data)  Stock      Stock Surplus   Earnings  Income Stock  Equity Interests Equity    

Balance at December 31, 2011

$

           2,051  398  2,792  7,554  470  (64 13,201  50  13,251 

Net income

 1,576  1,576  (2 1,574 

Other comprehensive loss

 (95 (95 (95

Cash dividends declared:

Common stock at $0.36 per share

 (325 (325 (325

Preferred stock

 (35 (35 (35

Shares acquired for treasury

 (23 (627 (650 (650

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

 (11 54  43  43 

Other

           (2    3  1     1 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 2,051  398  2,758  8,768  375  (634 13,716  48  13,764 

Net income

 1,836  1,836  (10 1,826 

Other comprehensive loss

 (293 (293 (293

Cash dividends declared:

Common stock at $0.47 per share

 (407 (407 (407

Preferred stock

 (37 (37 (37

Shares acquired for treasury

 (78 (1,242 (1,320 (1,320

Issuance of preferred stock

 1,034  1,034  1,034 

Redemption of preferred stock, Series G

 (398 (142 540  -   -  

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

 22  38  60  60 

Other

        1  (4    3  -   (1 (1

Balance at December 31, 2013

 2,051  1,034  2,561  10,156  82  (1,295 14,589  37  14,626 

Net income

 1,481  1,481  2  1,483 

Other comprehensive income

 347  347  347 

Cash dividends declared:

Common stock at$0.51 per share

 (427 (427 (427

Preferred stock

 (67 (67 (67

Shares acquired for treasury

 72  (726 (654 (654

Issuance of preferred stock

 297  297  297 

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

 13  47  60  60 

Other

 (2 2  -   -  

Balance at December 31, 2014

$

 2,051  1,331  2,646  11,141  429  (1,972 15,626  39  15,665 

     Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity       
($ in millions, except per share
data)
     Common
Stock
   Preferred
Stock
   Capital
Surplus
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Treasury
Stock
  Total
Bancorp
Shareholders’
Equity
  Non-
Controlling
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 $               2,051    1,034    2,561   10,156   82   (1,295  14,589   37   14,626 

Net income

         1,481     1,481   2   1,483 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

          347    347    347 

Cash dividends declared:

             

Common stock at $0.51 per share

         (427    (427   (427

Preferred stock(a)

         (67    (67   (67

Shares acquired for treasury

        72     (726  (654   (654

Issuance of preferred stock

      297        297    297 

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

        13     47   60    60 

Other

                   (2      2   -       - 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 $   2,051    1,331    2,646   11,141   429   (1,972  15,626   39   15,665 

Net income

         1,712     1,712   (6  1,706 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

          (232   (232   (232

Cash dividends declared:

             

Common stock at $0.52 per share

         (417    (417   (417

Preferred stock(b)

         (75    (75   (75

Shares acquired for treasury

        (3    (847  (850   (850

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

        23     52   75    75 

Other

                   (3      3   -   (2  (2

Balance at December 31, 2015

 $   2,051    1,331    2,666   12,358   197   (2,764  15,839   31   15,870 

Net income

         1,564     1,564   (4  1,560 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

          (138   (138   (138

Cash dividends declared:

             

Common stock at$0.53 per share

         (405    (405   (405

Preferred stock(c)

         (75    (75   (75

Shares acquired for treasury

        7     (668  (661   (661

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

        83   1    (4  80    80 

Other

                   (2      3   1       1 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 $   2,051    1,331    2,756   13,441   59   (3,433  16,205   27   16,232 
(a)

For the year ended December 31, 2014, dividends were $1,275.00 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H, $1,757.46 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I and $391.32 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J.

(b)

For the year ended December 31, 2015, dividends were $1,275.00 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H, $1,656.24 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I and $1,225.00 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J.

(c)

For the year endedDecember 31, 2016, dividends were $1,275.00 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H,$1,656.24 per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I and$1,225.00per preferred share for Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J.

RSeeefer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

8898  Fifth Third Bancorp


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014 2013 2012    2016    2015    2014 

 

Operating Activities

      

Net income

$                        1,483  1,826  1,574   $                    1,560     1,706     1,483  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Provision for loan and lease losses

 315  229  303    343     396     315  

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

 414  507  531    453     441     414  

Stock-based compensation expense

 83  78  69    111     100     83  

Provision for deferred income taxes

 79  253  271 

(Benefit from) provision for deferred income taxes

   (148)    (71)    79  

Securities gains, net

 (21 (21 (15   (7)    (5)    (21) 

Securities gains, net - non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

 -   (13 (3

Provision for (recovery of) MSR impairment

 65  (192 103 

(Recovery of) provision for MSR impairment

   (7)    (4)    65  

Net gains on sales of loans and fair value adjustments on loans held for sale

 (67 (622 (583   (101)    (98)    (67) 

Net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment

 19  6  21    13     101     19  

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 -   8  169 

Gains on sales of certain retail branch operations

   (19)         

Net losses on disposition and impairment of operating lease equipment

       33      

Gain on sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares

       (331)    (125) 

Gain on the TRA associated with Vantiv, Inc.

   (197)    (31)    (23) 

Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale

 5,477  22,047  22,044    6,895     5,102     5,477  

Loans originated for sale, net of repayments

 (4,874 (19,003 (21,439   (7,014)                        (5,142)                        (4,874) 

Dividends representing return on equity method investments

 42  54  45    28     25     42  

Gain on sales of Vantiv, Inc. shares and Vantiv, Inc. IPO

 (148 (336 (272

Net change in:

      

Trading securities

 (16 (131 (28   (23)    (34)    (16) 

Other assets

 (221 (672 4    351     94     (221) 

Accrued taxes, interest and expenses

 1  8  1    (157)    327      

Other liabilities

 (555 569  (238   24     (191)    (555) 

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

 2,076  4,595  2,557    2,114     2,418     2,076  

 

Investing Activities

      

Sales:

Available-for-sale securities

 5,234  9,328  2,521 

Proceeds from sales:

      

Available-for-sale and other securities

   18,280     16,828     5,234  

Loans

 147  657  275    360     741     147  

Bank premises and equipment

 24  33  13    82     37     24  

Repayments / maturities:

Available-for-sale securities

 2,265  3,191  4,100 

Proceeds from repayments / maturities:

      

Available-for-sale and other securities

   3,776     2,865     2,265  

Held-to-maturity securities

 20  74  36    44     117     20  

Purchases:

      

Available-for-sale securities

 (10,691 (16,216 (6,813

Available-for-sale and other securities

   (24,636)    (26,733)    (10,691) 

Bank premises and equipment

 (216 (274 (362   (186)    (164)    (216) 

Proceeds from sales and dividends representing return of equity method investments

 279  674  393    64     458     279  

Net cash paid on sales of certain retail branch operations

   (219)         

Net change in:

      

Other short-term investments

 (2,798 (2,695 (640   (83)    5,243     (2,798) 

Loans and leases

 (3,136 (4,750 (5,930   (243)    (3,238)    (3,136) 

Operating lease equipment

 (66 (206 (126   (126)    (85)    (66) 

 

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

 (8,938 (10,184 (6,533   (2,887)    (3,931)    (8,938) 

 

Financing Activities

      

Net change in:

      

Core deposits

 6,114  6,550  3,529 

Certificates - $100,000 and over, including foreign office and other

 (3,677 3,208  279 

Deposits

   1,146     1,493     2,437  

Federal funds purchased

 (140 (618 555    (19)        (140) 

Other short-term borrowings

 176  (4,900 3,041    2,028     (49)    176  

Dividends paid on common stock

 (423 (393 (309   (402)    (422)    (423) 

Dividends paid on preferred stock

 (67 (37 (35   (52)    (75)    (67) 

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

 6,570  5,044  523    3,735     3,091     6,570  

Repayment of long-term debt

 (1,399 (2,225 (3,159   (5,119)    (2,205)    (1,399) 

Repurchases of treasury shares and related forward contracts

 (654 (1,320 (650

Repurchases of treasury stock and related forward contracts

   (661)    (850)    (654) 

Issuance of preferred stock

 297  1,034  -             297  

Other

 (22 (17 (20   (31)    (28)    (22) 

 

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

 6,775  6,326  3,754    625     962     6,775  

(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Due from Banks

 (87 737  (222

 

Decrease in Cash and Due from Banks

   (148)    (551)    (87) 

Cash and Due from Banks at Beginning of Period

 3,178  2,441  2,663    2,540     3,091     3,178  

 

Cash and Due from Banks at End of Period

$3,091  3,178  2,441   $2,392     2,540     3,091  

 

SeeRefer to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Note 2 contains cash payments related to interest and income taxes in addition to noncashnon-cash investing and financing activities.

 

8999  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES

 

Nature of Operations

Fifth Third Bancorp, an Ohio corporation, conducts its principal lending, deposit gathering, transaction processing and service advisory activities through its banking andnon-banking subsidiaries from banking centers located throughout the Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the United States.

Basis of Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Bancorp and its majority-owned subsidiaries and VIEs in which the Bancorp has been determined to be the primary beneficiary. Other entities, including certain joint ventures, in which the Bancorp has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee, but upon which the Bancorp does not possess control, are accounted for by the equity method of accounting and not consolidated. The investments in those entities in which the Bancorp does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are generally carried at the lower of cost or fair value. Intercompany transactions and balances among consolidated entities have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Due From Banks

Cash and due from banks consist of currency and coin, cash items in the process of collection and due from banks. Currency and coin includes both U.S. and foreign currency owned and held at Fifth Third offices and that isin-transit to the FRB. Cash items in the process of collection include checks and drafts that are drawn on another depository institution or the FRB that are payable immediately upon presentation in the U.S. Balances due from banks include non-interest bearingnoninterest-bearing balances that are funds on deposit at other depository institutions or the FRB.

Securities

Securities are classified asheld-to-maturity,available-for-sale or trading on the date of purchase. Only those securities which management has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified asheld-to-maturity and reported at amortized cost. Securities are classified asavailable-for-sale when, in management’s judgment, they may be sold in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in market conditions. Securities are classified as trading when bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term.Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of related deferred income taxes, included in OCI. Trading securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in noninterest income. The fair value of a security is determined based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined based on quoted prices of similar instruments or DCF models that incorporate market inputs and assumptions including discount rates, prepayment speeds and loss rates. Realized securities gains or losses are reported within noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Available-for-sale andheld-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses are reviewed quarterly for possible OTTI. For debt securities, if the Bancorp intends to sell the debt security or will more likely than not be required to sell the debt security before recovery of the entire amortized cost basis, then an OTTI has

has occurred. However, even if the Bancorp does not intend to sell the debt security and will not likely be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its entire amortized cost basis, the Bancorp must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has occurred. In the event of a credit loss, the credit component of the impairment is recognized within noninterest income and thenon-credit component is recognized through OCI. For equity securities, the Bancorp’s management evaluates the securities in an unrealized loss position in theavailable-for-sale portfolio for OTTI on the basis of the duration of the decline in value of the security and severity of that decline as well as the Bancorp’s intent and ability to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the market value. If it is determined that the impairment on an equity security is other-than-temporary, an impairment loss equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the security and its fair value is recognized within noninterest income.

Portfolio Loans and Leases

Basis of Accounting

Portfolio loans and leases are generally reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income, deferred direct loan origination fees and costs and any direct principal charge-offs. Direct loan origination fees and costs are deferred and the net amount is amortized over the estimated life of the related loans as a yield adjustment. Interest income is recognized based on the principal balance outstanding computed using the effective interest method.

Loans acquired by the Bancorp through a purchase business combination are recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date. The Bancorp does not carry over the acquired company’s ALLL, nor does the Bancorp add to its existing ALLL as part of purchase accounting.

Purchased loans are evaluated for evidence of credit deterioration at acquisition and recorded at their initial fair value. For loans acquired with no evidence of credit deterioration, the fair value discount or premium is amortized over the contractual life of the loan as an adjustment to yield. For loans acquired with evidence of credit deterioration, the Bancorp determines at the acquisition date the excess of the loan’s contractually required payments over all cash flows expected to be collected as an amount that should not be accreted into interest income (nonaccretable difference). The remaining amount representing the difference in the expected cash flows of acquired loans and the initial investment in the acquired loans is accreted into interest income over the remaining life of the loan or pool of loans (accretable yield). Subsequent to the acqusitionacquisition date, increases in expected cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized prospectively as interest income over the remaining life of the loan. The present value of any decreases in expected cash flows resulting directly from a change in the contractual interest rate are recognized prospectively as a reduction of the accretable yield. The present value of any decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date as a result of credit deterioration is recognized by recording an ALLL or a directcharge-off. Subsequent to the purchaseacquisition date, the methods utilized to estimate the required ALLL are similar to originated loans. LoansThis method of accounting for loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality does not apply to loans carried at fair value, residential mortgage loans held for sale and loans under revolving credit agreements are excluded from the scope of this guidance on loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.agreements.

The Bancorp’s lease portfolio consists of both direct financing and leveraged leases. Direct financing leases are carried at the aggregate of lease payments plus estimated residual value of the leased property, less unearned income. Interest income on direct

90  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

financing leases is recognized over the term of the lease to achieve a constant periodic rate of return on the outstanding investment.

100  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Leveraged leases are carried at the aggregate of lease payments (less nonrecourse debt payments) plus estimated residual value of the leased property, less unearned income. Interest income on leveraged leases is recognized over the term of the lease to achieve a constant rate of return on the outstanding investment in the lease, net of the related deferred income tax liability, in the years in which the net investment is positive.

Nonaccrual Loans and Leases

When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the accrual of interest, amortization of loan premium, accretion of loan discount and amortization/accretion of deferred net direct loan origination fees are discontinued and all previously accrued and unpaid interest is charged against income. Commercial loans are placed on nonaccrual status when there is a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flows may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due. Such loans are also placed on nonaccrual status when the principal or interest is past due 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well securedwell-secured and in the process of collection. The Bancorp classifies residential mortgage loans that have principal and interest payments that have become past due 150 days as nonaccrual unless the loan is both well securedwell-secured and in the process of collection. Residential mortgage loans may stay on nonperformingnonaccrual status for an extended time as the foreclosure process typically lasts longer than 180 days. Home equity loans and lines of credit are reported on nonaccrual status if principal or interest has been in default for 90 days or more unless the loan is both well securedwell-secured and in the process of collection. Home equity loans and lines of credit that have been in default for 60 days or more are also reported on nonaccrual status if the senior lien has been in default 120 days or more, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. Residential mortgage, home equity, automobile and other consumer loans and leases that have been modified in a TDR and subsequently become past due 90 days are placed on nonaccrual status unless the loan is both well securedwell-secured and in the process of collection. Commercial and credit card loans that have been modified in a TDR are classified as nonaccrual unless such loans have sustained repayment performance of six months or greatermore and are reasonably assured of repayment in accordance with the restructured terms. Well securedWell-secured loans are collateralized by perfected security interests in real and/or personal property for which the Bancorp estimates proceeds from the sale would be sufficient to recover the outstanding principal and accrued interest balance of the loan and pay all costs to sell the collateral. The Bancorp considers a loan in the process of collection if collection efforts or legal action is proceeding and the Bancorp expects to collect funds sufficient to bring the loan current or recover the entire outstanding principal and accrued interest balance.

Nonaccrual commercial loans and nonaccrual credit card loans are generally accounted for on the cost recovery method. The Bancorp believes the cost recovery method is appropriate for nonaccrual commercial loans and nonaccrual credit card loans because the assessment of collectability of the remaining recorded investment of these loans involves a high degree of subjectivity and uncertainty due to the nature or absence of underlying collateral. Under the cost recovery method, any payments received are applied to reduce principal. Once the entire recorded investment is collected, additional payments received are treated as recoveries of amounts previouslycharged-off until recovered in full, and any subsequent payments are treated as interest income. Nonaccrual residential mortgage loans and other nonaccrual consumer loans are generally accounted for on the cash basis method. The Bancorp believes the cash basis method is

appropriate for nonaccrual

residential mortgage and other nonaccrual consumer loans because such loans have generally been written down to estimated collateral values and the collectability of the remaining investment involves only an assessment of the fair value of the underlying collateral, which can be measured more objectively with a lesser degree of uncertainty than assessments of typical commercial loan collateral. Under the cash basis method, interest income is recognized uponwhen cash receiptis received, to the extent to which itsuch income would have been accrued on the loan’s remaining balance at the contractual rate. Nonaccrual loans may be returned to accrual status when all delinquent interest and principal payments become current in accordance with the loan agreement and are reasonably assured of repayment in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement, or when the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection.

Commercial loans on nonaccrual status, including those modified in a TDR, as well as criticized commercial loans with aggregate borrower relationships exceeding $1 million, are subject to an individual review to identify charge-offs. The Bancorp does not have an established delinquency threshold for partially or fully charging off commercial loans. Residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and lines of credit and credit card loans that have principal and interest payments that have become past due 180 days are assessed for acharge-off to the ALLL, unless such loans are both well-secured and in the process of collection. Home equity loans and lines of credit are also assessed forcharge-off to the ALLL when such loans or lines of credit have become past due 120 days if the senior lien is also 120 days past due, unless such loans are both well-secured and in the process of collection. Automobile and other consumer loans and leases that have principal and interest payments that have become past due 120 days are assessed for acharge-off to the ALLL, unless such loans are both well-secured and in the process of collection.

Restructured Loans and Leases

A loan is accounted for as a TDR if the Bancorp, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. A TDR typically involves a modification of terms such as a reduction of the stated interest rate or remaining principal amount of the loan, a reduction of accrued interest or an extension of the maturity date(s)date at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for a new loan with similar risk. During the third quarter ofIn 2012, the OCC, a national bank regulatory agency, issued interpretive guidance that requiresnon-reaffirmed loans included in Chapter 7 bankruptcy filings to be accounted for as nonperforming TDRs and collateral dependent loans regardless of their payment history and capacity to pay in the future. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is a state chartered bank which therefore is not subject to guidance of the OCC. The Bancorp does not consider the bankruptcy court’s discharge of the borrower’s debt a concession when the discharged debt is not reaffirmed and as such, these loans are classified as TDRs only if one or more of the previously mentioned concessions are granted.

The Bancorp measures the impairment loss of a TDR based on the difference between the original loan’s carrying amount and the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the original, effective yield of the loan. Residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, automobile loans and other consumer loans modified as part of a TDR are maintained on accrual status, provided there is reasonable assurance of repayment and of performance according to the modified terms based upon a current, well-documented credit evaluation. Commercial loans and credit card loans modified as part of a TDR are maintained on accrual status provided there is a sustained payment history of six-monthssix months or greatermore prior to the modification in accordance with the modified

91  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

terms and collectability is reasonably assured for all remaining contractual payments under the modified terms are reasonably assured of collection. terms.

101  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TDRs of commercial loans and credit cards that do not have a sustained payment history of six months or greatermore in accordance with their modified terms remain on nonaccrual status until a six-monthsix month payment history is sustained. In certain cases, commercial TDRs on nonaccrual status may be accounted for using the cash basis method for income recognition, provided that full repayment of principal under the modified terms of the loan is reasonably assured.

Impaired Loans and Leases

A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bancorp will be unable to collect all amounts due (including both principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans generally consist of nonaccrual loans and leases, loans modified in a TDR and loans over $1 million that are currently on accrual status and not yet modified in a TDR, but for which the Bancorp has determined that it is probable that it will grant a payment concession in the near term due to the borrower’s financial difficulties. For loans modified in a TDR, the contractual terms of the loan agreement refer to the terms specified in the original loan agreement. A loan restructured in a TDR is no longer considered impaired in years after the restructuring if the restructuring agreement specifies a rate equal to or greater than the rate the Bancorp was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk and the loan is not impaired based on the terms specified by the restructuring agreement. Refer to the ALLL section for discussion regarding the Bancorp’s methodology for identifying impaired loans and determination of the need for a loss accrual.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale primarily represent conforming fixed-rate residential mortgage loans originated or acquired with the intent to sell in the secondary market and jumbo residential mortgage loans, commercial loans, other residential mortgage loans and other consumer loans that management has the intent to sell. Loans held for sale may be carried at the lower of cost or fair value, or carried at fair value where the Bancorp has elected the fair value option of accounting under U.S. GAAP. The Bancorp has elected to measure certain residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale under the fair value option. For loans in which the Bancorp has not elected the fair value option, the lower of cost or fair value is determined at the individual loan level.

The fair value of residential mortgage loans held for sale for which the fair value election has been made is estimated based upon mortgage-backed securities prices and spreads to those prices or, for certain ARM loans, DCF models that may incorporate the anticipated portfolio composition, credit spreads of asset-backed securities with similar collateral and market conditions. The anticipated portfolio composition includes the effects of interest rate spreads and discount rates due to loan characteristics such as the state in which the loan was originated, the loan amount and the ARM margin. These fair value marks are recorded as a component of noninterest income in mortgage banking net revenue. The Bancorp generally has commitments to sell residential mortgage loans held for sale in the secondary market. Gains or losses on sales are recognized in mortgage banking net revenue.

Management’s intent to sell residential mortgage loans classified as held for sale may change over time due to such factors as changes in the overall liquidity in markets or changes in characteristics specific to certain loans held for sale. Consequently, these loans may be reclassified to loans held for investment and, thereafter, reported within the Bancorp’s residential mortgage

class of portfolio loans and leases. In such cases, the residential mortgage

loans will continue to be measured at fair value, which is based on mortgage-backed securities prices, interest rate risk and an internally developed credit component.

Loans held for sale are placed on nonaccrual status consistent with the Bancorp’s nonaccrual policy for portfolio loans and leases.

Other Real Estate Owned

OREO, which is included in other assets, represents property acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings and is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell. All OREO property is periodically evaluated for impairment and decreases in carrying value are recognized as reductions in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For government-guaranteed mortgage loans, upon foreclosure, a separate other receivable is recognized if certain conditions are met for the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the guarantor. This receivable is also included in other assets, separate from OREO, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

ALLL

The Bancorp disaggregates its portfolio loans and leases into portfolio segments for purposes of determining the ALLL. The Bancorp’s portfolio segments include commercial, residential mortgage and consumer. The Bancorp further disaggregates its portfolio segments into classes for purposes of monitoring and assessing credit quality based on certain risk characteristics. Classes within the commercial portfolio segment include commercial and industrial, commercial mortgage owner-occupied, commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied, commercial construction and commercial leasing. The residential mortgage portfolio segment is also considered a class. Classes within the consumer portfolio segment include home equity, automobile, credit card and other consumer loans and leases. For an analysis of the Bancorp’s ALLL by portfolio segment and credit quality information by class, refer to Note 6.

The Bancorp maintains the ALLL to absorb probable loan and lease losses inherent in its portfolio segments. The ALLL is maintained at a level the Bancorp considers to be adequate and is based on ongoing quarterly assessments and evaluations of the collectability and historical loss experience of loans and leases. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL. Provisions for loan and lease losses are based on the Bancorp’s review of the historical credit loss experience and such factors that, in management’s judgment, deserve consideration under existing economic conditions in estimating probable credit losses. The Bancorp’s strategy for credit risk management includes a combination of conservative exposure limits significantly below legal lending limits and conservative underwriting, documentation and collections standards. The strategy also emphasizes diversification on a geographic, industry and customer level, regular credit examinations and quarterly management reviews of large credit exposures and loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality.

The Bancorp’s methodology for determining the ALLL is based on historical loss rates, current credit grades, specific allocation on loans modified in a TDR and impaired commercial credits above specified thresholds and other qualitative adjustments. Allowances on individual commercial loans, TDRs and historical loss rates are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as necessary based on changing borrower and/or collateral conditions and actual collection andcharge-off experience. An unallocated allowance is maintained to recognize the imprecision in estimating and measuring losses when evaluating allowances for individual loans or pools of loans.

102  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses, as well as loans that have been modified in a TDR, are subject to individual review for impairment. The Bancorp considers the current value of collateral, credit quality of any guarantees, the guarantor’s liquidity and willingness to cooperate, the loan structure and other factors when evaluating

92  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

whether an individual loan is impaired. Other factors may include the industry and geographic region of the borrower, size and financial condition of the borrower, cash flow and leverage of the borrower and the Bancorp’s evaluation of the borrower’s management. When individual loans are impaired, allowances are determined based on management’s estimate of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral and other sources of cash flow, as well as an evaluation of legal options available to the Bancorp. Allowances for impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, fair value of the underlying collateral or readily observable secondary market values. The Bancorp evaluates the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for a loss accrual.

Historical credit loss rates are applied to commercial loans that are not impaired or are impaired, but smaller than the established threshold of $1 million and thus not subject to specific allowance allocations. The loss rates are derived from a migration analysis,analyses for several portfolio stratifications, which trackstrack the historical netcharge-off experience sustained on loans according to their internal risk grade. The risk grading system utilized for allowance analysis purposes encompasses ten categories.

During 2016, the Bancorp refined its estimation techniques for the ALLL to introduce individual loss rate migration analyses for several commercial loan portfolio stratifications as contrasted to the single composite loss rate migration analysis for the entire commercial loan portfolio which was used in prior periods. These refinements did not substantively change any material aspect of the Bancorp’s overall approach in the determination of the ALLL and there have been no material changes in assumptions as compared to prior periods that impacted the determination of the current period allowance.

Homogenous loans and leases in the residential mortgage and consumer portfolio segments are not individually risk graded. Rather, standard credit scoring systems and delinquency monitoring are used to assess credit risks and allowances are established based on the expected net charge-offs. Loss rates are based on the trailing twelve month netcharge-off history by loan category. Historical loss rates may be adjusted for certain prescriptive and qualitative factors that, in management’s judgment, are necessary to reflect losses inherent in the portfolio. Factors that managementThe prescriptive loss rate factors include adjustments for delinquency trends, LTV trends and refreshed FICO score trends.

The Bancorp also considers qualitative factors in determining the analysisALLL. These include the effects of the national and local economies; trends in the nature and volume of delinquencies, charge-offs and nonaccrual loans;adjustments for changes in loan mix; credit score migration comparisons; asset quality trends;policies or procedures in underwriting, monitoring or collections, economic conditions, portfolio mix, lending and risk management personnel, results of internal audit and loan administration; changes inquality control reviews, collateral values and geographic concentrations. The Bancorp considers home price index trends when determining the internal lending policies and credit standards; collection practices; and examination results from bank regulatory agencies and the Bancorp’s internal credit reviewers.collateral value qualitative factor.

The Bancorp’s primary market areas for lending are the Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the Unites States.U.S. When evaluating the adequacy of allowances, consideration is given to these regional geographic concentrations and the closely associated effect changing economic conditions have on the Bancorp’s customers.

In the current year, the Bancorp has not substantively changed any material aspect to its overall approach to determining its ALLL for any of its portfolio segments. There have been no material changes in criteria or estimation techniques as compared

to prior periods that impacted the determination of the current period ALLL for any of the Bancorp’s portfolio segments.

Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

The reserve for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities and is included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The determination of the adequacy of the reserve is based upon an evaluation of the unfunded credit facilities, including an assessment of historical commitment utilization experience, credit risk grading and historical loss rates based on credit grade migration. This process takes into consideration the same risk elements that are analyzed in the determination of the adequacy of the Bancorp’s ALLL, as discussed above.previously discussed. Net adjustments to the reserve for unfunded commitments are included in other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Loan Sales and Securitizations

The Bancorp periodically sells loans through either securitizations or individual loan sales in accordance with its investment policies. The sold loans are removed from the balance sheet and a net gain or loss is recognized in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements at the time of sale. The Bancorp typically isolates the loans through the use of a VIE and thus is required to assess whether the entity holding the sold or securitized loans is a VIE and whether the Bancorp is the primary beneficiary and therefore consolidator of that VIE. If the Bancorp holds the power to direct activities most significant to the economic performance of the VIE and has the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE, then the Bancorp will generally be deemed the primary beneficiary of the VIE. If the Bancorp is determined not to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE but holds a variable interest in the entity, such variable interests are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or other accounting standards as appropriate. Refer to Note 1011 for further information on consolidated andnon-consolidated VIEs.

The Bancorp’s loan sales and securitizations are generally structured with servicing retained. As a result, servicing rights resulting from residential mortgage loan sales are initially recorded at fair value and subsequently amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing revenues and are reported as a component of mortgage banking net revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Servicing rights are assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance and permanentother-than-temporary impairment recognized through awrite-off of the servicing asset and related valuation allowance. Key economic assumptions used in measuring any potential impairment of the servicing rights include the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, the weighted-average life the discount rate, and the weighted-average coupon,OAS spread, as applicable. The primary risk of material changes to the value of the servicing rights resides in the potential volatility in the economic assumptions used, particularly the prepayment speeds. The Bancorp monitors risk and adjusts its valuation allowance as necessary to adequately reserve for impairment in the servicing portfolio. For purposes of measuring impairment, the mortgage servicing rights are stratified into classes based on the financial asset type (fixed-rate vs. adjustable rate)adjustable-rate) and interest rates. Fees received for servicing loans owned by investors are based on a percentage of the outstanding monthly principal balance of such loans and are included in noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income as loan payments are received. Costs of servicing loans are charged to expense as incurred.

103  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reserve for Representation and Warranty Provisions

Conforming residential mortgage loans sold to unrelated third parties are generally sold with representation and warranty provisions. A contractual liability arises only in the event of a breach of these representations and warranties and, in general, only when a loss results from the breach. The Bancorp may be required to repurchase any previously sold loan or indemnify (make whole) the investor or insurer for which the representation or warranty of the Bancorp proves to be inaccurate, incomplete or misleading. The Bancorp establishes a residential mortgage repurchase reserve related to various representations and warranties that reflects management’s estimate of losses based on a combination of factors.

The Bancorp’s estimation process requires management to make subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, such as future demand expectations, economic factors and the specific characteristics of the loans subject to repurchase. Such factors incorporate historical investor audit and repurchase demand rates, appeals success rates, historical loss

93  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

severity and any additional information obtained from the GSEs regarding future mortgage repurchase and file request criteria. At the time of a loan sale, the Bancorp records a representation and warranty reserve at the estimated fair value of the Bancorp’s guarantee and continually updates the reserve during the life of the loan as losses in excess of the reserve become probable and reasonably estimable. The provision for the estimated fair value of the representation and warranty guarantee arising from the loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale, which is included in other noninterest income at the time of sale. Updates to the reserve are recorded in other noninterest expense.

Legal Contingencies

The Bancorp is partyand its subsidiaries are parties to numerous claims and lawsuits as well as threatened or potential actions or claims concerning matters arising from the conduct of its business activities. The outcome of claims or litigation and the timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict and significant judgment may be required in the determination of both the probability of loss and whether the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. The Bancorp’s estimates are subjective and are based on the status of legal and regulatory proceedings, the merit of the Bancorp’s defenses and consultation with internal and external legal counsel. A reserveAn accrual for a potential litigation loss is established when information related to the loss contingency indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. This reserveaccrual is included in Other Liabilitiesother liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is adjusted from time to time as appropriate to reflect changes in circumstances. Legal expenses are recorded in other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Bank Premises and Equipment and Other Long-Lived Assets

Bank premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of the assets for book purposes, while accelerated depreciation is used for income tax purposes. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the lives of the related leases or useful lives of the related assets, whichever is shorter. Whenever events or changes in circumstances dictate, the Bancorp tests its long-lived assets for impairment by determining whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to a long-lived asset or asset group is less than the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group through a probability-weighted approach.

In the event the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable, an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group exceeds its fair value. Maintenance, repairs and minor improvements are charged to noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income as incurred.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Bancorp accounts for its derivatives as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value through adjustments to AOCI and/or current earnings, as appropriate. On the date the Bancorp enters into a derivative contract, the Bancorp designates the derivative instrument as either a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or as a free-standing derivative instrument. For a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability attributable to the hedged risk are recorded in current period net income. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument, to the extent that it is effective, are recorded in AOCI and subsequently reclassified to net income in the same period(s) that the hedged

transaction impacts net income. For free-standing derivative instruments, changes in fair values are reported in current period net income.

Prior to entering into a hedge transaction, the Bancorp formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking the derivative instrument designated as a fair value or cash flow hedge to a specific asset or liability on the balance sheet or to specific forecasted transactions and the risk being hedged, along with a formal assessment at both inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis as to the effectiveness of the derivative instrument in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. If it is determined that the derivative instrument is not highly effective as a hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued.

Tax Receivable Agreements

In conjunction with Vantiv, Inc.’s IPO in 2012, the Bancorp entered into two TRAs with Vantiv, Inc. The TRAs provide for payments by Vantiv, Inc. to the Bancorp of 85% of the cash savings actually realized as a result of the increase in tax basis that results from the historical or future purchase of equity in Vantiv Holding, LLC from the Bancorp or from the exchange of equity units in Vantiv Holding, LLC for cash or Class A Stock, as well as any tax benefits attributable to payments made under the TRA. Any actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments made under the TRA depend on a number of uncertain factors, the most significant of which is the realization of the tax benefits by Vantiv, Inc., which depends on the amount and timing of Vantiv, Inc.’s reportable taxable income. The Bancorp accounts for these TRAs as gain contingencies and recognizes income when all uncertainties surrounding the realization of such amounts are resolved.

Income Taxes

The Bancorp estimatesaccounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax expense based on amountsassets and liabilities for expected to be owed tofuture tax consequences. Under the various tax jurisdictions in which the Bancorp conducts business. On a quarterly basis, management assesses the reasonableness of its effective tax rate based upon its current estimate of the amountasset and components of net income, tax credits and the applicable statutory tax rates expected for the full year. The estimated income tax expense is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Deferred incomeliability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined usingby applying the balance sheet methodfederal and state tax rates to the differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the corresponding tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also recorded for any tax attributes, such as tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards. The net balances of deferred tax asset or liability isassets and liabilities are reported in other assets orand accrued taxes, interest and expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under this method, the net

104  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Any effect of a change in federal or state tax rates on deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities andis recognized in income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date. The Bancorp reflects enacted changes inthe expected amount of income tax rates and laws. Deferredto be paid or refunded during the year as current income tax assets are recognized to the extent they exist and are subject to a valuation allowance based on management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis and includes an evaluation of all positive and negative evidence, such as the limitation on the use of any net operating losses, to determine whether realization is more likely than not.

expense or benefit. Accrued taxes represent the net estimatedexpected amount due to and/or from taxing jurisdictions and are reported in accrued taxes, interest and expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Bancorp evaluates the realization of deferred tax assets based on all positive and assessesnegative evidence available at the relative risksbalance sheet date. Realization of deferred tax assets is based on the Bancorp’s judgment about relevant factors affecting their realization, including the taxable income within any applicable carryback periods, future projected taxable income, the reversal of taxable temporary differences and appropriatetax-planning strategies. The Bancorp records a valuation allowance for deferred tax treatmentassets where the Bancorp does not believe that it ismore-likely-than-not that the deferred tax assets will be realized.

Income tax benefits from uncertain tax positions are recognized in the financial statements only if the Bancorp believes that it ismore-likely-than-not that the uncertain tax position will be sustained based solely on the technical merits of transactionsthe tax position and filing positions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedentconsideration of the relevant taxing authority’s widely understood administrative practices and other informationprecedents. If the Bancorp does not believe that it ismore-likely-than-not that an uncertain tax position will be sustained, the Bancorp records a liability for the uncertain tax position. If the Bancorp believes that it is more likely than not that an uncertain tax position will be sustained, the Bancorp only records a tax benefit for the portion of the uncertain tax position where the likelihood of realization is greater than 50% upon settlement with the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The Bancorp recognizes interest expense, interest income and maintainspenalties related to unrecognized tax accruals consistent with its evaluation of these relative risks and merits. Changes to the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in tax rates, interpretations of tax laws, the status of examinations being conducted by taxing authorities and changes to statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance that impact the relative risks of tax positions. These changes, when they occur, can affect deferred taxes and accrued taxes as well as thebenefits within current period’s income tax expense and can be significant to the operating results of the Bancorp. Any interest and penalties incurred in connection with income taxes are recorded as a component of income tax expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information on income taxes, referexpense. Refer to Note 20.20 for further discussion regarding income taxes.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Earnings per diluted share is computed by dividing adjusted net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number

94  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common stock equivalents represent the assumed conversion of dilutive convertible preferred stock, the exercise of dilutive stock-based awards and warrants and the dilutive effect of the settlement of outstanding forward contracts.

The Bancorp calculates earnings per share pursuant to thetwo-class method. Thetwo-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share separately for common stock and participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. For purposes of calculating earnings per share under thetwo-class method, restricted shares that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities until vested. While the dividends declared per share on such restricted shares are the same as dividends declared per common share outstanding, the dividends recognized on such restricted shares may be less because dividends paid on restricted shares that are expected to be forfeited are reclassified to compensation expense during the period when forfeiture is expected.

Goodwill

Business combinations entered into by the Bancorp typically include the acquisition of goodwill. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at the Bancorp’s reporting unit level on an annual basis, which for the Bancorp is September 30, and more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that there may be impairment. The Bancorp has determined that its segments qualify as reporting units under U.S. GAAP.

Impairment exists when a reporting unit’s carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. In testing goodwill for impairment, U.S. GAAP permits the Bancorp to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. In this qualitative assessment, the Bancorp evaluates events and circumstances which may include, but are not limited to, the general economic environment, banking industry and market conditions, the overall financial performance of the Bancorp, the performance of the Bancorp’s common stock, the key financial performance metrics of the Bancorp’s reporting units and events affecting the reporting units. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, the Bancorp determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing thetwo-step impairment test would be unnecessary. However, if the Bancorp concludes otherwise or elects to bypass the qualitative assessment, it would then be required to perform the first step (Step 1) of the goodwill impairment test, and continue to the second step (Step 2), if necessary. Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any.

The fair value of a reporting unit is the price that would be received to sell the unit as a whole in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As none of the Bancorp’s reporting units are publicly traded, individual reporting unit fair value determinations cannot be directly correlated to the Bancorp’s stock price. To determine the fair value of a reporting unit, the Bancorp employs an income-based approach, utilizing the reporting unit’s forecasted cash flows (including a terminal value approach to estimate cash flows beyond the final year of the forecast) and the reporting unit’s estimated cost of equity as the discount rate. Additionally, the Bancorp determines its market capitalization based on the average of the closing price of the

Bancorp’s stock during the month including the measurement date, incorporating an additional control premium, and compares this market-based fair value measurement to the aggregate fair value of the Bancorp’s reporting units in order to corroborate the results of the income approach.

When required to perform Step 2, the Bancorp compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss equal to that excess amount is recognized. A recognized impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying amount of that goodwill and cannot be reversed in future periods even if the fair value of the reporting unit subsequently recovers.

During Step 2, the Bancorp determines the implied fair value of goodwill for a reporting unit by assigning the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. This assignment process is only performed for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment.

105  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Bancorp does not adjust the carrying values of recognized assets or liabilities (other than goodwill, if appropriate), nor does it recognize previously unrecognized intangible assets in the Consolidated Financial Statements as a result of this assignment process. Refer to Note 89 for further information regarding the Bancorp’s goodwill.

Fair Value Measurements

The Bancorp measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Valuation techniques the Bancorp uses to measure fair value include the market approach, income approach and cost approach. The market approach uses prices or relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach involves discounting future amounts to a single present amount and is based on current market expectations about those future amounts. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of the asset.

U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the instrument’s fair value measurement. The three levels within the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Bancorp has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are

95  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability for which there is little, if any, market activity at the measurement date. Unobservable inputs reflect the Bancorp’s own assumptions about what market participants would use to price the asset or liability. The inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include the Bancorp’s own financial data such as internally developed pricing models and DCF methodologies, as well as instruments for which the fair value determination requires significant management judgment.

The Bancorp’s fair value measurements involve various valuation techniques and models, which involve inputs that are observable, when available. Valuation techniques and parameters used for measuring assets and liabilities are reviewed and validated by the Bancorp on a quarterly basis. Additionally, the Bancorp monitors the fair values of significant assets and liabilities using a variety of methods including the evaluation of pricing runs and exception reports based on certain analytical criteria, comparison to previous trades and overall review and assessments for reasonableness. The Bancorp may, as a practical expedient, measure the

fair value of certain investments on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment, or its equivalent. Any investments which are valued using this practical expedient are not classified in the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 27 for further information on fair value measurements.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Bancorp recognizes compensation expense for the grant-date fair value of stock-based awards that are expected to vest over the requisite service period. All awards, both those with cliff vesting and graded vesting, are expensed on a straight-line basis. Awards to employees that meet eligible retirement status are expensed immediately. As compensation expense is recognized, a deferred tax asset is recorded that represents an estimate of the future tax deduction from exercise or release of restrictions. At the time awards are exercised, cancelled, expire or restrictions are released, the Bancorp may be required to recognizerecognizes an adjustment to income tax expense for the difference between the previously estimated tax deduction and the actual tax deduction realized. For further information on the Bancorp’s stock-based compensation plans, refer to Note 24.

Pension Plans

The Bancorp uses an expected long-term rate of return applied to the fair market value of assets as of the beginning of the year and the expected cash flow during the year for calculating the expected investment return on all pension plan assets. Amortization of the net gain or loss resulting from experience different from that assumed and from changes in assumptions (excluding asset gains and losses not yet reflected in market-related value) is included as a component of net periodic benefit cost. If, as of the beginning of the year, that net gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation and the market-related value of plan assets, the amortization is that excess divided by the average remaining service period of participating employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. The Bancorp uses a third-party actuary to compute the remaining service period of participating employees. This period reflects expected turnover,pre-retirement mortality and other applicable employee demographics.

Other

Securities and other property held by Fifth Third Investment Advisors,Wealth and Asset Management, a division of the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary, in a fiduciary or agency capacity are not included in the Consolidated

Balance Sheets because such items are not assets of the subsidiaries. Investment advisoryWealth and asset management revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income is recognized on the accrual basis. Investment advisoryWealth and asset management service revenues are recognized monthly based on a fee charged per transaction processed and/or a fee charged on the market value of average account balances associated with individual contracts.

The Bancorp recognizes revenue from its card and processing services on an accrual basis as such services are performed, recording revenues net of certain costs (primarily interchange fees charged by credit card associations) not controlled by the Bancorp.

The Bancorp purchases life insurance policies on the lives of certain directors, officers and employees and is the owner and beneficiary of the policies. The Bancorp invests in these policies, known as BOLI, to provide an efficient form of funding for long-term retirement and other employee benefits costs. The Bancorp records these BOLI policies within other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at each policy’s respective cash surrender value, with changes recorded in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles, customer lists,non-compete agreements and cardholder relationships.

106  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Other intangible assets are amortized on either a straight-line or an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives. The Bancorp reviews other intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

Securities sold under repurchase agreements are accounted for as secured borrowings and included in other short-term borrowings in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the amounts at which the securities were sold plus accrued interest.

Acquisitions of treasury stock are carried at cost. Reissuance of shares in treasury for acquisitions, exercises of stock-based awards or other corporate purposes is recorded based on the specific identification method.

Advertising costs are generally expensed as incurred.

ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DEVELOPMENTS

Accounting and Reporting DevelopmentsStandards Adopted in 2016

Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date

In February 2013, the FASB issued amended guidance relating to the measurement of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount under the arrangement is fixed at the reporting date. For the total amount of an obligation under an arrangement to be considered fixed at the reporting date, there can be no measurement uncertainty relating to the total amount of the obligation. The obligation resulting from joint and several liability arrangements would be measured initially as the sum of 1) the amount the Bancorp has agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and 2) any additional amount the Bancorp expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The amended guidance also would require the Bancorp to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as information about the risks that such obligations pose to future cash flows. The amended guidance was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013 and was applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented for those obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements that exist at the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2014 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists

96  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In July 2013, the FASB issued amended guidance to clarify that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The assessment of whether a deferred tax asset is available is based on the unrecognized tax benefit and deferred tax asset that exist at the reporting date and should be made presuming disallowance of the tax position at the reporting date. The amended guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2014 and the adoption of the amended guidance did not have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects

In January 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance which would permit the Bancorp to make an accounting policy election to account for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects using a proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met and to present the amortization as a component of income tax expense. The amended guidance would be applied retrospectively to all periods presented and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. Regardless of the policy election, the amended guidance requires disclosures to enable the users of the financial statements to understand the nature of the Bancorp’s investments in qualified affordable housing projects and the effect of the measurement of the investments in qualified affordable housing projects and the related tax credits on the Bancorp’s financial position and results of operation.

The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance onfollowing new accounting standards effective January 1, 2015, and did not make an accounting policy election to apply the proportional amortization method for its investments in qualified affordable housing projects. Therefore, the adoption did not have an impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.2016:

Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure

In January 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance that clarifies when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The amended guidance clarifies that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. In addition, the amended guidance requires interim and annual disclosures of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the

recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. The amended guidance may be applied prospectively or through a modified retrospective approach and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2015 and the adoption of the amended guidance did not have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity

In April 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance that changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations. The amended guidance requires a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results when any of the following occurs: 1) the component of an entity or group of components of an entity meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale; 2) the component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of by sale; or 3) the component of an entity or group of components of an entity is disposed of other than by sale (for example, by abandonment or in a distribution to owners in a spinoff). The amended guidance requires an entity to present, for each comparative period, the assets and liabilities of a disposal group that includes a discontinued operation separately in the asset and liability sections, respectively, of the statement of financial position, as well as additional disclosures about discontinued operations. The amended guidance is to be applied prospectively for 1) all disposals (or classifications as held for sale) of components of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years; and 2) all businesses or nonprofit activities that, on acquisition, are classified as held for sale that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2015 and the adoption of the amended guidance did not have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance on revenue recognition from contracts with customers. The standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most contract revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the amended guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within the reporting period, and should be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized at the date of initial application. Early adoption is prohibited. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

97  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures

In June 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance that changes the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. The amended guidance also requires separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The amended guidance requires disclosures for certain transactions comprising: 1) a transfer of a financial asset accounted for as a sale and 2) an agreement with the same transferee entered into in contemplation of the initial transfer that results in the transferor retaining substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction. The amended guidance also requires new disclosures for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions accounted for as secured borrowings. The amended guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption prohibited. Changes in accounting for transactions outstanding on the effective date should be presented as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The disclosures for certain transactions accounted for as a sale are required to be presented for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and the disclosures for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions accounted for as secured borrowings are required to be presented for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2015 and the adoption of the amended guidance did not have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2014-12 – Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of thean Award Provide That a Performance Target Could beBe Achieved after the Requisite Service Period

In June 2014, the FASB issued amended guidanceASU2014-12 which clarifies that a performance target that affects vesting and can be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The amended guidance provides that an entity should apply existing guidance as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. The amended guidance is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The amended guidance may beBancorp adopted either prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or

modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying the amended guidance as ofprospectively and the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. The amended guidance isadoption did not expected to have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2014-13 – Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity

In August 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance thatASU2014-13 which provides an alternative to ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement for measuring the financial assets and financial liabilities of a CFE, such as a collateralized debt obligation or a collateralized loan obligation entity consolidated as a VIE when a) all of the financial assets and the financial liabilities of that CFE are measured at fair value in the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements and b) the changes in the fair values of those financial assets and financial liabilities are reflected in earnings. If elected, the measurement alternative would allow the Bancorp to measure both the financial assets and the financial liabilities of the CFE by using the more observable of the fair value of the financial assets or the fair value of the financial liabilities and to eliminate any measurement difference. When the measurement alternative is not elected for a consolidated

CFE within the scope of this amended guidance, the amendments clarify that 1) the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities of the consolidated CFE should be measured using the requirements of Topic 820 and 2) any difference in the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities of that consolidated CFE should be reflected in earnings and attributed to the Bancorp in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The amended guidance may be applied retrospectively or through a modified retrospective approach and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure

In August 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance clarifying the classification of certain foreclosed mortgage loans that are either full or partially guaranteed under government programs. The amended guidance requires that a mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met: 1) the loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure; 2) at the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under that claim; and 3) at the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed. Upon foreclosure, the separate other receivable would be measured based on the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the guarantor. The amended guidance may be applied prospectively or through a modified retrospective approach and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2015retrospectively and the adoption of the amended guidance did not have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

98  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Pushdown Accounting

In November 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance on whether and at what threshold an acquired entity that is a business or nonprofit activity can apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon the occurrence of an event in which an acquirer (an individual or an entity) obtains control of the acquired entity. The amended guidance provides that an acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown accounting in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs. An acquired entity should determine whether to elect to apply pushdown accounting for each individual change-in-control event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. If pushdown accounting is not applied in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs, an acquired entity will have the option to elect to apply pushdown accounting in a subsequent reporting period to the acquired entity’s most recent change-in-control event. An election to apply pushdown accounting in a reporting period after the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurred should be considered a change in accounting principle. If pushdown accounting is applied to an individual change-in-control event, that election is irrevocable. If an acquired entity elects the option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements, it should disclose information in the current reporting period that enables users of financial statements to evaluate the effect of pushdown accounting. The amended guidance was effective upon issuance, and the adoption of the amended guidance did not have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2014-16 – Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share isIs More Akin to Debt or to Equity

In November 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance thatASU2014-16 which clarifies how current U.S. GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. Specifically, the amendments clarify that an entity should consider all relevant terms and features—features, including the embedded derivative features being evaluated for bifurcation—bifurcation, in evaluating the nature of the host contract. Furthermore, the amendments clarify that no single term or feature would necessarily determine the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract. Rather, the nature of the host contract depends upon the economic characteristics and risks of the entire hybrid financial instrument. The amended guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The effects of initially adoptingBancorp adopted the amended guidance should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued inand the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective and shall be reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. The amended guidance isadoption did not expected to have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2015-01 – Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic225-20):Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items

In January 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance thatASU2015-01 which eliminates the concept of extraordinary items from U.S. GAAP. Presently,Previously, an event or transaction iswas presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of a reporting entity unless evidence clearly supportssupported its classification as an extraordinary item, which musthad to be both unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence. An entity was required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income

from continuing operations. An entity was also required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-shareearnings per share data applicable to the extraordinary item. The presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance is effective for fiscal years,prospectively and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with earlythe adoption permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amended guidance may be applied prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The amended guidance isdid not expected to have a material impact on the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements.

ASU2015-02 – Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis

In February 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance thatASU2015-02 which changes the analysis a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. The amended guidance 1) modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities; 2) eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership; 3) affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships; and 4) provides a scope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities that are required to comply with or operate in accordance with requirements that are similar to those inRule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for registered money market funds.

107  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on a modified retrospective basis and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2015-03 – Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-03 which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amended guidance. Subsequent to issuance of ASU2015-03, the FASB also issued ASU2015-15 to incorporate comments from the SEC that its staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs forline-of-credit arrangements as an asset and subsequently amortizing these costs ratably over the term of the line of credit arrangement, regardless of whether there were any outstanding borrowings on the line of credit arrangement. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance in ASU2015-03 and ASU2015-15 retrospectively. Upon adoption, the Bancorp reclassified approximately $34 million of debt issuance costs from other assets to a direct deduction from long-term debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

ASU2015-04 – Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-04 which simplifies an entity’s measurement of the fair value of plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plan when the fiscalyear-end does not coincide with a month end. For an entity with a fiscalyear-end that does not coincide with amonth-end, the amended guidance provides a practical expedient that permits the entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using themonth-end that is closest to the entity’s fiscalyear-end and apply that practical expedient consistently from year to year. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively on January 1, 2016 and the adoption did not have an impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements as the Bancorp’s fiscalyear-end coincides with amonth-end.

ASU2015-05 – Intangibles—Goodwill andOther—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-05 which amended guidance on a customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement. Under the amended guidance, if a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2015-07 – Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-07 which removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The amended guidance also

removes the requirement to make certain disclosures for all investments that are eligible to be measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. Rather, those disclosures are limited to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using that practical expedient. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance retrospectively and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2015-16 – Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-16 to simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination. The amended guidance eliminates the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments and requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The acquirer shall record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The amended guidance requires an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-09 – Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-09 to simplify the accounting for share-based compensation paid to employees. The amended guidance 1) requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies on share-based payments to employees to be recognized directly to income tax expense or benefit in the Consolidated Income Statements; 2) requires excess tax benefits to be included as operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; 3) provides entities with the option of making an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures of share-based payments as they occur instead of estimating the awards expected to be forfeited; and 4) changes the threshold to qualify for equity classification to permit withholdings up to the maximum statutory tax rate in the applicable jurisdiction. In addition, excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies are considered discrete items in the reporting period they occur and are not included in the estimate of an entity’s annual effective tax rate.

        As permitted, the Bancorp elected to early adopt the amended guidance during the fourth quarter of 2016 with an effective date of January 1, 2016. The changes to the recognition of excess tax benefits were applied prospectively beginning January 1, 2016, resulting in a reclassification from capital surplus to income tax expense for the excess tax benefits originally recorded to capital surplus during 2016. This reclassification did not materially impact the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 but the reclassification did affect previously reported results for interim periods. Net tax deficiencies of $1 million, $5 million and $0 were reclassified from capital surplus to applicable income tax expense during the three months ended March 31, 2016, June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, respectively, related to the adoption. The Bancorp adopted the amendments to presentation requirements for the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on a prospective basis and the impact of adopting these amendments was not material.

108  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Bancorp elected to continue estimating awards expected to be forfeited, and therefore this amended guidance did not have an impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. The amended guidance also contained other provisions which either did not apply to the Bancorp or did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.

Standards Issued but Not Yet Adopted

The following accounting standards were issued but not yet adopted by the Bancorp as of December 31, 2016:

ASU2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-09 which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most contract revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the amended guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU2014-09, the FASB has issued additional guidance to clarify certain implementation issues, including ASUs2016-08 (Principal versus Agent Considerations),2016-10 (Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing),2016-12 (Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients), and2016-20 (Technical Corrections and Improvements) in March, April, May and December 2016, respectively. These amendments do not change the core principles in ASU2014-09 and the effective date and transition requirements are consistent with those in the original ASU. The Bancorp plans to adopt the amended guidance on its required effective date of January 1, 2018, using a modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized at the date of initial application. Because the amended guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, the Bancorp’s preliminary analysis suggests that the adoption of this amended guidance is not expected to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements, although the Bancorp will also be subject to expanded disclosure requirements upon adoption and the Bancorp’s revenue recognition processes for wealth and asset management revenue, corporate banking revenue, and card and processing revenue may be affected. However, there are certain areas of the amended guidance, such as credit card interchange fees and related rewards programs, which are subject to interpretation and for which the Bancorp has not made final conclusions regarding the applicability and the related impact, if any. Accordingly, the results of the Bancorp’s materiality analysis, as well as its selected adoption method, may change as these conclusions are reached.

ASU2016-01 – Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-01 which revises an entity’s accounting related to 1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities, 2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value, and 3) certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The amendments require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes as a result of an observable price change. The amendments also simplify the impairment assessment of equity

investments for which fair value is not readily determinable by requiring an entity to perform a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. If qualitative indicators are identified, the entity will be required to measure the investment at fair value. For financial liabilities that an entity has elected to measure at fair value, the amendments require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the change in fair value that results from a change in instrument-specific credit risk. For public business entities, the amendments 1) eliminate the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost and 2) require, for disclosure purposes, the use of an exit price notion in the determination of the fair value of financial instruments. The Bancorp plans to adopt the amended guidance on its required effective date of January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, the Bancorp will be required to make a cumulative-effect adjustment to the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The guidance on equity securities without a readily determinable fair value will be applied prospectively to all equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption. Early adoption of the amendments is not permitted with the exception of the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value for which early application is permitted. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-02 – Leases (Topic 842)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02 which establishes a new accounting model for leases. The amended guidance requires lessees to record lease liabilities on the lessees’ balance sheets along with correspondingright-of-use assets for all leases with terms longer than twelve months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the lessee’s statements of income. From a lessor perspective, the accounting model is largely unchanged, except that the amended guidance includes certain targeted improvements to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and the revenue recognition guidance in ASC Topic 606. The amendments also modify disclosure requirements for an entity’s lease arrangements. The amended guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015,the Bancorp on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The amendments should be applied to each prior reporting period presented using a modified retrospective approach, although the amended guidance contains certain transition relief provisions that, among other things, permit an entity to elect not to reassess the classification of leases which existed or expired as of the date the amendments are effective. The Bancorp is currently in the process of developing an inventory of all leases and accumulating the lease data necessary to apply the amended guidance. The Bancorp is continuing to evaluate the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements, but the effects of recognizing most operating leases on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are expected to be material. The Bancorp expects to recognizeright-of-use assets and lease liabilities for substantially all of its operating lease commitments disclosed in Note 7 based on the present value of unpaid lease payments as of the date of adoption.

ASU2016-04 – Liabilities—Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic405-20): Recognition of Breakage for Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-04 which permits proportional derecognition of the liability for unused funds on certain prepaid stored-value products (known as breakage) to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of the recognized breakage amount will not subsequently occur.

109  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The amendments do not apply to any prepaid stored-value products that are attached to a segregated customer deposit account, or products for which unused funds are subject to unclaimed property remittance laws. The amended guidance may be applied using either a retrospective approachretrospectively to all comparable periods presented in the year of adoption or applied on a modified retrospective approach withbasis by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equityretained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Bancorp plans to adopt the amended guidance on its required effective date of January 1, 2018 and is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting the amended guidance on the Bancorp’sits Consolidated Financial Statements. However, the Bancorp’s preliminary analysis suggests that most of its prepaid stored-value products will not be affected by the amended guidance.

ASU2016-05 – Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-05 which clarifies that a change in counterparty in a derivative contract does not, in and of itself, represent a change in critical terms that would require discontinuation of hedge accounting provided that other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively on January 1, 2017. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-06 – Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-06 which clarifies the requirements for determining when contingent put and call options embedded in debt instruments should be bifurcated from the debt instrument and accounted for separately as derivatives. A four-step decision sequence should be followed in determining whether such options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the debt instrument, which determines whether bifurcation is necessary. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance on January 1, 2017 on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-07 – Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-07 to eliminate the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations and retained earnings retroactively on astep-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting, eliminating the requirement to retrospectively apply the equity method of accounting back to the date of the initial investment. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance prospectively on January 1, 2017. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-13 – Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-13 which establishes a new approach to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments. The new approach changes the impairment model for most financial assets, and will require the use of an “expected credit loss” model for financial instruments measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments, including trade and other

receivables, loans, debt securities, net investments in leases, andoff-balance-sheet credit exposures (such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees not accounted for as insurance). This model requires entities to estimate the lifetime expected credit loss on such instruments and record an allowance that represents the portion of the amortized cost basis that the entity does not expect to collect. This allowance is deducted from the financial asset’s amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected. The new expected credit loss model will also apply to purchased financial assets with credit deterioration, superseding current accounting guidance for such assets. The amended guidance also amends the impairment model foravailable-for-sale debt securities, requiring entities to determine whether all or a portion of the unrealized loss on such securities is a credit loss, and also eliminating the option for management to consider the length of time a security has been in an unrealized loss position as a factor in concluding whether or not a credit loss exists. The amended model states that an entity will recognize an allowance for credit losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities as a contra account to the amortized cost basis, instead of a direct reduction of the amortized cost basis of the investment, as under current guidance. As a result, entities will recognize improvements to estimated credit losses onavailable-for-sale debt securities immediately in earnings as opposed to interest income over time. There are also additional disclosure requirements included in this guidance. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted as early as January 1, 2019. The amended guidance is to be applied on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of initially applying the amendments recognized in retained earnings at the date of initial application. However, certain provisions of the guidance are only required to be applied on a prospective basis. While the Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements, it currently expects the ALLL to increase upon adoption given that the allowance will be required to cover the full remaining expected life of the portfolio upon adoption, rather than the incurred loss model under current U.S. GAAP. The extent of this increase is still being evaluated and will depend on economic conditions and the composition of the Bancorp’s loan and lease portfolio at the time of adoption.

ASU2016-15 – Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-15 to clarify the guidance for classification of certain cash receipts and payments within an entity’s statements of cash flows. These items include debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, settlement ofzero-coupon debt instruments, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of BOLI policies, distributions received from equity method investees, and beneficial interests in securitization transactions. The amended guidance also specifies how to address classification of cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied on a retrospective basis unless it is impractical to do so. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-16 – Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-16 which requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.

 

 

99110  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Current U.S. GAAP prohibits the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the guidance is effective. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-17 – Consolidation (Topic 810): Interests Held Through Related Parties That Are Under Common Control

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-17 which changes the accounting for the consolidation of VIEs in certain situations involving entities under common control. Specifically, the amendments change how the indirect interests held through related parties that are under common control should be included in a reporting entity’s evaluation of whether it is a primary beneficiary of a VIE. Under the amended guidance, the reporting entity is only required to include the indirect interests held through related parties that are under common control in a VIE on a proportionate basis. Currently, the indirect interests held by the related parties that are under common control are considered to be the equivalent of direct interests in their entirety. The Bancorp adopted the amended guidance retrospectively on January 1, 2017. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2016-18 – Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-18 to provide clarifying guidance on the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on an entity’s statements of cash flows. The guidance requires that restricted cash be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling thebeginning-of-period andend-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is to be

applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2017-01 – Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-01 which clarifies the definition of a business in order to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amended guidance provides a screen which states that when substantially all of the fair value of assets acquired (or disposed) is concentrated in a single asset or group of similar assets, then the set of assets and activities would not be considered a business. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2018, and is to be applied prospectively. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU2017-04 – Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-04 which simplifies the test for goodwill impairment by removing the second step, which measures the amount of impairment loss, if any. Instead, the amended guidance states that an entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, except that the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This would apply to all reporting units, including those with zero or negative carrying amounts of net assets. The amended guidance is effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2020, and is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Bancorp is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the amended guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

Cash payments related to interest and income taxes in addition to noncashnon-cash investing and financing activities are presented in the following table for the years ended December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)2014    2013    2012   2016   2015   2014 

Cash payments:

 

Cash Payments:

      

Interest

$                    429  406  524   $                    578                        475                        429 

Income taxes

 550                 535                 383    800    400    550 

Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:

Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:

      

Portfolio loans to loans held for sale

 855  641  62    238    487    855 

Loans held for sale to portfolio loans

 31  44  77    28    288    31 

Portfolio loans to OREO

 145  204  272    49    105    145 

Loans held for sale to OREO

 2  4  23    -    -    2 

Capital lease obligation

 15   -   - 

Capital lease

   -    4    15 

 

3. RESTRICTIONS ON CASH, DIVIDENDS AND DIVIDENDSOTHER CAPITAL ACTIONS

 

Reserve Requirement

The FRB, under Regulation D, requires that banks hold cash in reserve against deposit liabilities when total reservable deposit liabilities are greater than the regulatory exemption, known as the reserve requirement. The reserve requirement is calculated based on atwo-week average of daily net transaction account deposits as defined by the FRB and may be satisfied with average vault cash.cash during the followingtwo-week maintenance period. When vault cash is not sufficient to meet the reserve requirement, the remaining amount must be satisfied with average funds held at the FRB. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary reserve requirement was $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. Vault cash was not sufficient to meet the total reserve requirement; therefore, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary satisfied the remaining reserve requirement with $1.0 billion and $942 million, respectively, of the Bancorp’s total deposit at the FRB. The noninterest-bearing portion of the Bancorp’s deposit at

the FRB is held in cash and due from banks in the Consolidated Balance Sheets while the interest bearinginterest-bearing portion is held in other short-term investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary reserve requirement was $1.6 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively. Additionally, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary average reserve requirement was $1.6 billion and $1.8 billion in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

111  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Restrictions on Cash Dividends

The principal source of income and funds for the Bancorp (parent company) are dividends from its subsidiaries. The dividends paid by the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary are subject to regulations and limitations prescribed by state and federal supervisory agencies. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary paid the Bancorp’s nonbank subsidiary holding company, which in turn paid the Bancorp $1.1$1.9 billion and $859 million$1.0 billion in dividends during the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The Bancorp’s nonbank-subsidiaries are also limited by certain federal and state statutory provisions and regulations covering the amount of dividends that may be paid in any given year.

Capital Actions

In 2011, the FRB adopted the capital plan rule, which requires BHCs with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more to submit annual capital plans to the FRB for review. Under the rule, these capital plans must include detailed descriptions of the following: the BHC’s internal processes for assessing capital adequacy; the policies governing capital actions such as common stock issuances, dividends and share repurchases; and all planned capital actions over a nine-quarter planning horizon. Further, each BHC must also report to the FRB the results of stress tests conducted by the BHC under a number of scenarios that assess the sources and uses of capital under baseline and stressed economic scenarios. The FRB launched the 20142016 stress testing program and CCAR on November 1, 2013,January 28, 2016, with firm submissions of stress test results and capital plans due to the FRB on January 6, 2014,April 5, 2016, which the Bancorp submitted as required.

The FRB’s review of the capital plan assessed the comprehensiveness of the capital plan, the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan. Additionally, the FRB reviewed the robustness of the capital adequacy process, the capital policy and the Bancorp’s ability to maintain capital above theeach minimum regulatory capital ratios and above a Tier I common ratio of five percent on a pro forma basis under expected and stressful conditions throughout the planning horizon. The FRB assessed

On June 29, 2016, the Bancorp’s strategies for addressing

proposed revisionsBancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the regulatory capital framework agreed upon byFRB as part of the BCBS and requirements arising from the DFA.

On March 26, 2014, the FRB announced it had completed the 20142016 CCAR. For BHCs that proposed capital distributions in their plans, the FRB either objected to the plan or provided anon-objection whereby the FRB permitted the proposed 2014 capital distributions. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning AprilJuly 1, 20142016 and ending March 31, 2015:

June 30, 2017:

 (a)

The potential increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $0.13 per share;$0.14 in the fourth quarter of 2016;

 (b)

The potential repurchase of common shares in an amount up to $669 million;$660 million, which includes $84 million in repurchases related to share issuances under employee benefit plans;

 (c)

The additional ability to repurchase shares in the amount of any realizedafter-tax gains from the sale of Vantiv, Inc. common stock; andstock, if executed;

 (d)

The issuanceadditional ability to repurchase shares in the amount of $300 million in preferred stock.any realizedafter-tax gains from the termination and settlement of any portion of the TRA with Vantiv, Inc., if executed.

As contemplated by the 20142015 CCAR, during the first quarter of 2016, the Bancorp entered into a $240 million accelerated share repurchase transaction and during the second quarter of 2014,2016, the Bancorp repurchased approximately $26 million of its outstanding common stock through open market share repurchase transactions. Additionally, as contemplated by the 2016 CCAR, the Bancorp entered into $240 million and $155 million accelerated share repurchase transactions during the third and fourth quarters of 2016, respectively. For further information, refer to Note 23. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Bancorp increased the quarterly common stock dividend from $0.12 to $0.13 per share, entered into a $150 million accelerated share repurchase transaction, and issued 300,000 depositary shares of non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock for net proceeds of $297 million. Additionally, during the third and fourth quarters of 2014, the Bancorp entered into accelerated share repurchase transactions of $225 million and $180 million, respectively.$0.14.

Additionally, as a CCAR institution, the Bancorp is required to disclose the results of itscompany-run stress test under the supervisory severely adverse scenario and to provide information related to the types of risk included in its stress testing; a general description of the methodologies used; estimates of certain financial results and pro forma capital ratios; and an explanation of the most significant causes of changes in regulatory capital ratios. On March 26, 2014June 23, 2016 the Bancorp publicly disclosed the results of itscompany-run stress test as required by the DFA stress testing rules.rules in a press release.

The BHCs that participated in the 20142016 CCAR, including the Bancorp, arewere required to also conduct mid-cycle company-runmid-cyclecompany-run stress tests using data as of March 31, 2014.June 30, 2016. The stress tests must be based on three BHC defined scenarios – baseline, adverse and severely adverse. As required, theThe Bancorp reported the itsmid-cycle stress test results to the FRB by the required October 5, 2016 submission date. In addition, the Bancorp published a Form8-K providing a summary of the results under the severely adverse scenario on July 7, 2014.October 27, 2016. These results represented estimates of the Bancorp’s results from the secondthird quarter of 2014

100  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2016 through the secondthird quarter of 20162018 under the severely adverse scenario, which is considered highly unlikely to occur.

The FRB launched the 2015 stress testing program and CCAR on October 23, 2014. The stress testing results and capital plan were submitted by the Bancorp to the FRB on January 5, 2015.

The FRB expects to release summary results of the 2015 stress testing program and CCAR in March of 2015. The results will include supervisory projections of capital ratios, losses and revenues

under the supervisory adverse and supervisory severely adverse scenarios. The FRB will also issue an objection or non-objection to each participating institution’s capital plan submitted under CCAR. Additionally, as a CCAR institution, the Bancorp will be required to publicly disclose the results of its company run stress test as required by the DFA, within 15 days of the date the FRB discloses the results of its DFA supervisory stress test.

 

 

112  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

 

The following table provides the amortized cost, fair value and unrealized gains and losses for the major categories of theavailable-for-sale and other andheld-to-maturity investment securities portfolios as of December 31:

 

 

 
   2014 2013 
($ in millions)  

 Amortized

 Cost

 

 Unrealized

Gains

 

 Unrealized

Losses

 

 Fair

 Value

 

  Amortized

  Cost

 

 Unrealized

Gains

 

 Unrealized

Losses

 

  Fair

  Value

 

 

 

Available-for-sale and other:

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

$    1,545      87    -      1,632      1,549    121    -      1,670     

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 185      7    -      192      187    5    -      192     

Mortgage-backed securities:

Agency residential mortgage-backed
securities(a)

 11,968      437    (1)     12,404      12,294    140    (150)     12,284     

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 4,465      101    (1)     4,565      -     -     -      -      

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 1,489      61    -      1,550      1,368    28    (1)     1,395     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 1,324      40    (2)     1,362      2,146    48    (7)     2,187     

Equity securities(b)

 701      3    (1)     703      865    5    (1)     869     

 

 

Total

$    21,677      736    (5)         22,408      18,409    347    (159)         18,597     

 

 

Held-to-maturity:

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

$    186      -     -      186      207    -     -      207     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 1      -     -      1      1    -     -      1     

 

 

Total

$    187      -     -      187      208    -     -      208     

 

 

 

 
    2016   2015 
  

 

   

 

 

 
($ in millions)    Amortized 
 Cost      
  Unrealized
Gains    
   Unrealized
Losses    
   Fair  
Value
   Amortized
Cost     
   Unrealized
Gains    
   Unrealized
Losses    
   Fair    
Value    
 

 

 

Available-for-sale and other securities:

                

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $ 547        2        -        549    1,155         32        -        1,187     

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  44        1        -        45    50         2        -        52     

Mortgage-backed securities:

                

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities(a)

  15,525        178        (95)       15,608    14,811         283        (13)       15,081     

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  9,029        87        (61)       9,055    7,795         100        (33)       7,862     

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  3,076        51        (15)       3,112    2,801         35        (32)       2,804     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  2,106        28        (18)       2,116    1,363         13        (21)       1,355     

Equity securities(b)

  697        3        (2)       698    703         2        (2)       703     

 

 

Totalavailable-for-sale and other securities

 $ 31,024        350        (191)       31,183    28,678         467        (101)       29,044     

 

 

Held-to-maturity securities:

                

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

 $ 24        -        -        24    68         -        -        68     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  2        -        -        2    2         -        -        2     

 

 

Totalheld-to-maturity securities

 

$

 26        -        -        26    70         -        -        70     

 

 
(a)

Includes interest-only mortgage-backed securities of$17560and $262$50 as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, recorded at fair value with fair value changes recorded in securities gains, net, and securities gains, net – non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Equity securities consist of FHLB, FRB and FRBDTCC restricted stock holdings of$248,$358, and$3521, respectively, atDecember 31, 20142016 and $402$248, $355 and $349,$1, respectively, at December 31, 2013,2015, that are carried at cost, and certain mutual fund and equity security holdings.

The following table presents realized gains and losses that were recognized in income fromavailable-for-sale securities for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

($ in millions)

         2014    2013    2012          2016       2015      2014           

 

 

Realized gains

$70  77  75        $72      97      70          

Realized losses

 (9        (102        (2)         (45     (76     (9)         

OTTI

 (24 (74 (58)         (16     (5     (24)         

 

 

Net realized gains (losses)(a)

$37  (99 15      

Net realized gains(a)

  $         11      16      37          

 

 
(a)

Excludes net losses on interest-only mortgage-backed securities of$174, $4 and $17 for the years endedDecember 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

The following table provides a summary of OTTI by security type:

 

 
($ in millions)  2016       2015      2014           

 

 

Available-for-sale and other debt securities

  $(15)      (5     (24)         

Available-for-sale equity securities

   (1)      -      -          

 

 

Total OTTI(a)

  $         (16)      (5     (24)         

 

 
(a)

Included in securities gains, net, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Trading securities were $410 million as of December 31, 2016, compared to $386 million at December 31, 2015. The following table presents total gains and losses that were recognized in income from trading securities for the years ended December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)  2016       2015      2014           

 

 

Realized gains(a)

  $           9      6      8          

Realized losses(b)

   (13     (10     (7)         

Net unrealized gains (losses)(c)

   4      (3     (3)         

 

 

Total trading securities losses

  $-      (7     (2)         

 

 
(a)

Includes realized gains of$7, $6 and $4 for the years endedDecember 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, recorded in corporate banking revenue and wealth and asset management revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Includes realized losses of$10, $10 and $7 for the years endedDecember 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, recorded in corporate banking revenue and wealth and asset management revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(c)

Includes an immaterial amount of net unrealized gains for the years endedDecember 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and an immaterial amount of net unrealized losses for the year endedDecember 31, 2014 recorded in corporate banking revenue and net gains on interest-only mortgage-backed securitieswealth and asset management revenue in the Consolidated Statements of $129 for the year ended December 31, 2013.Income.

 

Trading securities totaled $360 million as of December 31, 2014, compared to $343 million at December 31, 2013. Gross realized gains on trading securities were $4 million, $1 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Gross realized losses on trading securities were immaterial to the Bancorp for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Net unrealized losses on trading securities were $3

million at December 31, 2014 and net unrealized gains on trading securities were $3 million and $1 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

At December 31, 20142016 and 20132015, securities with a fair value of $14.2$10.1 billion and $11.6$11.0 billion, respectively, were pledged to

secure borrowings, public deposits, trust funds, derivative contracts and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

 

 

101  Fifth Third Bancorp

113  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The expected maturity distribution of the Bancorp’s mortgage-backed securities and the contractual maturity distribution of the remainder of the Bancorp’savailable-for-sale and other andheld-to-maturity investment securities as of December 31, 20142016 are shown in the following table:

 

 
             Available-for-Sale and Other              Held-to-Maturity 
               Available-for-Sale and Other                             Held-to-Maturity                   

 

 

  

 

 

 
($ in millions)        Amortized Cost   Fair Value       Amortized Cost   Fair Value      Amortized Cost   Fair Value      Amortized Cost     Fair Value      

 

Debt securities:(a)

                  

Less than 1 year

 $ 168               169          148            148              $ 328              332          2         2       

1-5 years

  6,583               6,841          21            21               7,290              7,347          11         11       

5-10 years

  12,784               13,190          17            17               20,043              20,146          12         12       

Over 10 years

  1,441               1,505          1            1               2,666              2,660          1         1       

Equity securities

  701               703          -            -               697              698           -         -       

 

Total

 $ 21,677               22,408           187            187              $ 31,024              31,183          26         26       

 
(a)

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities when there exists a right to call or prepay obligations exists with or without call or prepayment penalties.

The following table provides the fair value and gross unrealized losses onavailable-for-sale and other securities in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31:

 

 
             Less than 12 months                     12 months or more           Total 
              Less than 12 months               12 months or more         Total   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
($ in millions)    Fair Value   Unrealized
Losses
   Fair Value   Unrealized
Losses
   Fair Value   Unrealized     
Losses     
    Fair Value Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value      Unrealized    
 Losses
       Fair Value       Unrealized
      Losses
   

2014

            

 

2016

        

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $   199          -          -     -                199     -       

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

  73     (1)         -          -          73     (1)             6,223          (88)         172     (7)               6,395     (95)      

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   355     (1)         -          -          355     (1)             3,183          (61)         -     -                3,183     (61)      

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   286     (1)         74         (1)         360     (2)          

Equity securities

        -          30         (1)         30     (1)          

Total

 

$

  714     (3)         104         (2)         818     (5)          

2013

            

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

 7,221     (150)         1         -          7,222     (150)          

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  168     (1)         28         -          196     (1)             1,052          (15)         -     -                1,052     (15)      

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  427     (4)         104         (3)         531     (7)             422          (8)         336     (10)               758     (18)      

Equity securities

  33     (1)         4         -          37     (1)             -          -          37     (2)               37     (2)      

 

Total

 

$

 7,849     (156)         137         (3)         7,986     (159)           $   11,079          (172)         545     (19)               11,624     (191)      

 

2015

        

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 $  2,903         (13)         -     -               2,903    (13)      

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  3,111         (33)         -     -               3,111    (33)      

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  1,610         (32)         -     -               1,610    (32)      

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

  623         (11)        226    (10)              849    (21)      

Equity securities

  1         (1)        37    (1)              38    (2)      

 

Total

 $  8,248         (90)        263    (11)              8,511    (101)      

 

 

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments

The Bancorp recognized $24 million, $74 million and $58 million of OTTI on its available-for-sale and other debt securities, included in securities gains, net and securities gains, net – non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights, in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Statements of Income during the years endedAt December 31, 2014, 20132016 and 2012, respectively. The Bancorp did not recognize OTTI on any of its available-for-sale equity securities or held-to-maturity debt securities for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132015, an immaterial amount and 2012. Less than one percent1%, respectively, of unrealized losses in theavailable-for-sale and other securities portfolio were represented bynon-rated securities at December 31, 2014 and 2013. securities.

 

 

102114  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

5. LOANS AND LEASES

 

The Bancorp diversifies its loan and lease portfolio by offering a variety of loan and lease products with various payment terms and rate structures. Lending activities are generally concentrated within those states in which the Bancorp has banking centers and are primarily located in the Midwestern and Southeastern regions of the United States.U.S. The Bancorp’s commercial loan portfolio consists of

lending to various industry types. Management periodically reviews the

performance of its loan and lease products to evaluate whether they are performing within acceptable interest rate and credit risk levels and changes are made to underwriting policies and procedures as needed. The Bancorp maintains an allowance to absorb loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio. For further information on credit quality and the ALLL, refer to Note 6.

 

 

The following table provides a summary of the totalcommercial loans and leases classified by primary purpose and consumer loans and leases classified based upon product or collateral as of December 31:

 

 

 
($ in millions)2014     2013                 2016         2015             

 

 

Loans and leases held for sale:

Loans held for sale:

      

Commercial and industrial loans

$36  31               $60      20         

Commercial mortgage loans

 11  3                5      34         

Commercial construction loans

 2  2             

Commercial leases

 1  1             

Residential mortgage loans

 1,193  890                686      708         

Other consumer loans and leases

 18  17             

Home equity

   -      35         

Automobile loans

   -      4         

Credit card

   -      101         

Other consumer loans

   -      1         

 

 

Total loans and leases held for sale

$1,261  944             

Total loans held for sale

  $751      903         

 

 

Portfolio loans and leases:

      

Commercial and industrial loans

$40,765  39,316               $41,676      42,131         

Commercial mortgage loans

 7,399  8,066                6,899      6,957         

Commercial construction loans

 2,069  1,039                3,903      3,214         

Commercial leases

 3,720  3,625                3,974      3,854         

 

 

Total commercial loans and leases

 53,953  52,046                56,452      56,156         

 

 

Residential mortgage loans

 12,389  12,680                15,051      13,716         

Home equity

 8,886  9,246                7,695      8,301         

Automobile loans

 12,037  11,984                9,983      11,493         

Credit card

 2,401  2,294                2,237      2,259         

Other consumer loans and leases

 418  364                680      657         

 

 

Total consumer loans and leases

 36,131  36,568                35,646      36,426         

 

 

Total portfolio loans and leases

$            90,084  88,614               $            92,098      92,582         

 

 

 

Total portfolio loans and leases are recorded net of unearned income, which totaled $665$503 million as of December 31, 20142016 and $700$624 million as of December 31, 2013.2015. Additionally, portfolio loans and leases are recorded net of unamortized premiums and discounts, deferred direct loan origination fees and costs and fair value adjustments (associated with acquired loans or loans designated as fair value

upon origination) which totaled a net

premium of $169$240 million and $111$220 million as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

The Bancorp’s FHLB and FRB advances are generally secured by loans. The Bancorp had loans of $11.1$13.1 billion and $10.9$11.9 billion at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, pledged at the FHLB, and loans of $33.9$40.0 billion and $33.5$33.7 billion at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, pledged at the FRB.

 

 

The following table presents a summary of the total loans and leases owned by the Bancorp and net charge-offs (recoveries) as of and for the years ended December 31:

 

    Balance 90 Days Past Due
and Still Accruing
 

Net

Charge-Offs

 
($ in millions)  2014          2013         2014 2013 2014 2013           

Commercial and industrial loans

$ 40,801        39,347          $-  - $222  168           

Commercial mortgage loans

 7,410        8,069           -  -  26  47           

Commercial construction loans

 2,071        1,041           -  -  12  4           

Commercial leases

 3,721        3,626           -  -  1  1           

Residential mortgage loans

 13,582        13,570           56  66  126  60           

Home equity

 8,886        9,246           -  -  59  97           

Automobile loans

 12,037        11,984           8  8  27  22           

Credit card

 2,401        2,294           23  29  82  78           

Other consumer loans and leases

  436        381           -  -  20  24           

Total loans and leases

$ 91,345        89,558          $            87  103 $            575  501           

Less: Loans held for sale

$ 1,261        944          

Total portfolio loans and leases

$             90,084        88,614                      

103  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 
   Carrying Value   90 Days Past Due
        and Still Accruing        
   

Net  

Charge-Offs (Recoveries)  

 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
($ in millions)  2016       2015             2016     2015         2016     2015         

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

  $41,736      42,151            4      7          172      229         

Commercial mortgage loans

   6,904      6,991            -      -          15      27         

Commercial construction loans

   3,903      3,214            -      -          (1     3         

Commercial leases

   3,974      3,854            -      -          4      2         

Residential mortgage loans

   15,737      14,424            49      40          10      17         

Home equity

   7,695      8,336            -      -          27      39         

Automobile loans

   9,983      11,497            9      10          35      28         

Credit card

   2,237      2,360            22      18          80      82         

Other consumer loans and leases

   680      658            -      -          20      19         

 

 

Total loans and leases

  $        92,849      93,485            84      75          362      446         

 

 

Less: Loans held for sale

  $751      903                     

 

             

Total portfolio loans and leases

  $92,098      92,582                     

 

 

 

The Bancorp engages in commercial lease products primarily related to the financing of commercial equipment. The Bancorp

had $2.8$3.3 billion and $2.7$3.1 billion of direct financing leases, net of unearned income, at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, and $874$701 million and $881$801 million of leveraged leases, net of unearned income, at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

115  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Pre-tax income from leveraged leases was $25$38 million and included $16 million of gains on early terminations during both the yearsyear ended December 31, 20142016.Pre-tax income from leveraged leases

was $27 million and 2013 andincluded $7 million of gains on early terminations during the year ended December 31, 2015. The tax effect of this income was a benefit of $10 million and an expense of $9$1 million during both the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015, respectively.

 

The following table provides the components of the investment in portfolio commercial lease financing atportfolio as of December 31:

 

($ in millions)2014     2013              2016      2015      

Rentals receivable, net of principal and interest on nonrecourse debt

$3,589  3,556            $            3,551                 3,550    

Estimated residual value of leased assets

 779  754             903     906    

Initial direct cost, net of amortization

 17  15             23     22    

Gross investment in lease financing

 4,385  4,325             4,477     4,478    

Unearned income

 (665 (700)             (503)    (624)   

Net investment in lease financing(a)

$             3,720  3,625          

Net investment in commercial lease financing(a)

  $3,974     3,854    

(a)

The accumulated allowance for uncollectible minimum lease payments was$45 million15and $53 million$47 atDecember 31, 20142016and 2013,2015, respectively.

 

The Bancorp periodically reviews residual values associated with its leasing portfolio. Declines in residual values that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are recognized as a loss. The Bancorp recognized $4$1 million and $13$8 million of residual value write-downs related to commercial leases for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. The residual value write-downs related

write-downs related to commercial leases are recorded in corporate banking revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. At December 31, 2014,2016, the minimum future lease payments receivable for each of the years 20152017 through 20192021 was $681$813 million, $625$716 million, $501$611 million, $405$482 million and $329$361 million, respectively.

 

116  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

6. CREDIT QUALITY AND THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES

 

The Bancorp disaggregates ALLL balances and transactions in the ALLL by portfolio segment. Credit quality related disclosures for loans and leases are further disaggregated by class.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The following tables summarize transactions in the ALLL by portfolio segment:segment for the years ended December 31:

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

($ in millions)

Commercial Residential
Mortgage
 Consumer Unallocated Total          

Transactions in the ALLL:

Balance at January 1

$1,058       189       225       110       1,582          

Losses charged-off

 (299)       (139)       (241)       -         (679)          

Recoveries of losses previously charged-off

 38       13       53       -         104          

Provision for loan and lease losses

 78       41       200       (4)       315          

Balance at December 31

$875       104       237       106       1,322          

For the year ended December 31, 2013

($ in millions)

Commercial Residential
Mortgage
 Consumer Unallocated Total          

Transactions in the ALLL:

Balance at January 1

$1,236       229       278       111       1,854          

Losses charged-off

 (284)       (70)       (283)       -         (637)         

Recoveries of losses previously charged-off

 64       10       62       -         136          

Provision for loan and lease losses

 42       20       168       (1)       229          

Balance at December 31

$1,058       189       225       110       1,582          

For the year ended December 31, 2012

($ in millions)

Commercial Residential
Mortgage
 Consumer Unallocated Total          

Transactions in the ALLL:

Balance at January 1

$1,527       227       365       136       2,255          

Losses charged-off

 (358)       (129)       (350)       -         (837)         

Recoveries of losses previously charged-off

 61       7       65       -         133          

Provision for loan and lease losses

 6       124       198       (25)       303          

Balance at December 31

$             1,236       229       278       111       1,854          

104  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

2016 ($ in millions) Commercial     Residential
Mortgage  
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total    

 

Balance, beginning of period

 $840           100           217           115           1,272   

Charge-offs

  (232)          (19)          (205)          -           (456)  

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off

  42           9           43           -           94   

Provision for loan and lease losses

  181           6           159           (3)          343   

 

Balance, end of period

 $831           96           214           112           1,253   

 

 

2015 ($ in millions) Commercial     Residential
Mortgage  
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total    

 

Balance, beginning of period

 $875           104           237           106           1,322   

Charge-offs

  (298)          (28)          (216)          -           (542)  

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off

  37           11           48           -           96   

Provision for loan and lease losses

  226           13           148           9           396   

 

Balance, end of period

 $840           100           217           115           1,272   

 

 

2014 ($ in millions) Commercial     Residential
Mortgage  
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total    

 

Balance, beginning of period

 $            1,058           189           225           110           1,582   

Charge-offs

  (299)          (139)          (241)          -           (679)  

Recoveries of losses previouslycharged-off

  38           13           53           -           104   

Provision for loan and lease losses

  78           41           200           (4)          315   

 

Balance, end of period

 $875           104           237           106           1,322   

 

The following tables provide a summary of the ALLL and related loans and leases classified by portfolio segment:

 

As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)Commercial Residential
Mortgage
 Consumer Unallocated Total       

As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions) Commercial     Residential
Mortgage  
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total  

ALLL:(a)

                  

Individually evaluated for impairment

$179 (c)     65     61    -        305          $118  (c)      68          44          -          230   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 696        39     176    -        911           713          28          170          -          911   

Unallocated

 -        -     -    106      106           -          -          -          112          112   

Total ALLL

$875        104     237    106      1,322          $831          96          214          112          1,253   

Portfolio loans and leases:(b)

                  

Individually evaluated for impairment

$1,260 (c)     518     483    -        2,261          $904  (c)      652          371          -          1,927   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 52,693        11,761     23,259    -        87,713           55,548          14,253          20,224          -          90,025   

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

 -        2     -    -        2           -          3          -          -            

Total portfolio loans and leases

$          53,953        12,281     23,742    -        89,976          $        56,452          14,908          20,595          -          91,955   

(a)

Includes$62 related to leveraged leases.leases atDecember 31, 2016.

(b)

Excludes$108143 of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value, and includes$874701 of leveraged leases, net of unearned income.income, atDecember 31, 2016.

(c)

Includes five restructured nonaccrual loans atDecember 31, 20142016 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with a recorded investment of$2826 and an allowanceALLL of$1018.

 

As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)Commercial 

 

Residential
Mortgage

 Consumer Unallocated Total      

As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions) Commercial     Residential
Mortgage  
     Consumer     Unallocated     Total  

ALLL:(a)

                  

Individually evaluated for impairment

$186 (c)     139     53      -        378          $119  (c)      67          49          -          235   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 872         50     172      -        1,094          721          33          168          -          922   

Unallocated

 -         -     -       110      110           -          -          -          115          115   

Total ALLL

$1,058         189     225      110      1,582          $840          100          217          115          1,272   

Portfolio loans and leases:(b)

                  

Individually evaluated for impairment

$1,560 (c)     1,325     496      -        3,381          $815  (c)      630          424          -          1,869   

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 50,486         11,259     23,392      -        85,137          55,341          12,917          22,286          -          90,544   

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality

 -         4     -       -        4           -          2          -          -            

Total portfolio loans and leases

$         52,046         12,588     23,888      -        88,522          $        56,156          13,549          22,710          -          92,415   

(a)

Includes $9$5 related to leveraged leases.leases at December 31, 2015.

(b)

Excludes $92$167 of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value, and includes $881$801 of leveraged leases, net of unearned income.income at December 31, 2015.

(c)

Includes five restructured loans at December 31, 20132015 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with a recorded investment of $28$27 and an allowanceALLL of $11.$15.

117  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

CREDIT RISK PROFILE

Commercial Portfolio Segment

For purposes of analyzing historic loss rates used in the determination of the ALLL and monitoring the credit quality and risk characteristics of its commercial portfolio segment, the Bancorp disaggregates the segment into the following classes: commercial and industrial, commercial mortgage owner-occupied, commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied, commercial construction and commercial leasing.leases.

To facilitate the monitoring of credit quality within the commercial portfolio segment, and for purposes of analyzing historical loss rates used in the determination of the ALLL for the commercial portfolio segment, the Bancorp utilizes the following categories of credit grades: pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful orand loss. The five categories, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions, are assigned upon initial approval of credit to borrowers and updated periodically thereafter.

Pass ratings, which are assigned to those borrowers that do not have identified potential or well defined weaknesses and for which there is a high likelihood of orderly repayment, are updated at least annually based on the size and credit characteristics of the borrower. All other categories are updated on a quarterly basis during the month preceding the end of the calendar quarter.

The Bancorp assigns a special mention rating to loans and leases that have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses

may, at some future date, result in the deterioration of the repayment

prospects for the loan or lease or the Bancorp’s credit position.

The Bancorp assigns a substandard rating to loans and leases that are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. Substandard loans and leases have well defined weaknesses or weaknesses that could jeopardize the orderly repayment of the debt. Loans and leases in this grade also are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bancorp will sustain some loss if the deficiencies noted are not addressed and corrected.

The Bancorp assigns a doubtful rating to loans and leases that have all the attributes of a substandard rating with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonable specific pending factors that may work to the advantage of and strengthen the credit quality of the loan or lease, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined. Pending factors may include a proposed merger or acquisition, liquidation proceeding, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral or refinancing plans.

Loans and leases classified as loss are considered uncollectible and arecharged-off in the period in which they are determined to be uncollectible. Because loans and leases in this category are fullycharged-off, they are not included in the following tables.

 

105  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following tables summarize the credit risk profile of the Bancorp’s commercial portfolio segment, by class:

 

As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)Pass         Special
Mention
 Substandard Doubtful Total         

Commercial and industrial loans

$38,013  1,352    1,400        -     40,765     

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 3,430  137    267        -    3,834     

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 3,198  76    284        7    3,565     

Commercial construction loans

 1,966  65    38        -    2,069     

Commercial leases

 3,678  9    33        -    3,720     

Total

$              50,285  1,639    2,022        7    53,953     

As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)Pass         Special
Mention
 Substandard Doubtful Total         

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)   Pass        Special
Mention
      Substandard      Doubtful        Total         

 

Commercial and industrial loans

$36,776  1,118    1,419        3    39,316      $   38,844      1,204        1,604            24          41,676   

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 3,866  209    415        17    4,507         3,168      72        117            3          3,360   

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 2,879  248    431        1    3,559         3,466      4        69            -          3,539   

Commercial construction loans

 855  32    152        -    1,039         3,902      1        -            -          3,903   

Commercial leases

 3,546  56    23        -    3,625         3,894      54        26            -          3,974   

Total

$              47,922  1,663    2,440        21    52,046     

 

Total commercial loans and leases

 $   53,274      1,335        1,816            27          56,452   

 

 
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)   Pass        Special
Mention
      Substandard      Doubtful        Total         

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 $   38,756      1,633        1,742            -          42,131   

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

    3,344      124        191            -          3,659   

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

    3,105      63        130            -          3,298   

Commercial construction loans

    3,201      4        9            -          3,214   

Commercial leases

    3,724      93        37            -          3,854   

 

Total commercial loans and leases

 $   52,130      1,917        2,109            -          56,156   

 

 

Residential Mortgage and Consumer Portfolio SegmentSegments

For purposes of monitoring the credit quality and risk characteristics of its consumer portfolio segment, the Bancorp disaggregates the segment into the following classes: home equity, automobile loans, credit card and other consumer loans and leases. The Bancorp’s residential mortgage portfolio segment is also a separate class.

The Bancorp considers repayment performance as the best indicator of credit quality for residential mortgage and consumer

loans, which includes both the delinquency status and performing versus nonperforming status of the loans. The delinquency status of all residential mortgage and consumer loans is presented by class in the age analysis section while the performing versus nonperforming status is presented in the table below.following table. Refer to the nonaccrual loans and leases section of Note 1 for additional information on delinquency and nonperforming information.loan accounting and reporting policies.

 

118  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following table presents a summary of the Bancorp’s residential mortgage and consumer portfolio segments, by class, disaggregated into performing versus nonperforming status as of December 31:

 

 
 2016   2015 
  2014 2013  

 

   

 

 

 
($ in millions)  Performing Nonperforming Performing Nonperforming             Performing          Nonperforming                   Performing           Nonperforming       

 

Residential mortgage loans(a)

$ 12,204     77          12,423    165 

$

 14,874           34                13,498            51               

Home equity

 8,793     93          9,153      93  7,622           73                8,222            79               

Automobile loans

 12,036     1          11,982        2  9,981           2                11,491            2               

Credit card

 2,360     41          2,261      33  2,209           28                2,226            33               

Other consumer loans and leases

 418     -             364    -  680           -                657            -               

Total

$           35,811     212          36,183    293

 

Total residential mortgage and consumer loans and leases(a)

 

$

 35,366           137                36,094            165               

 
(a)

Excludes$108143 and $92$167 of loans measured at fair value atDecember 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

106  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans and Leases

The following tables summarize the Bancorp’s recorded investment in portfolio loans and leases, by age and class:

 

                                Past Due                                   

 

As of December 31, 2014

($ in millions)

Current
Loans and
Leases(c)
 30-89
Days(c)
 

90 Days

and

Greater(c)

 

Total

Past Due

 

Total Loans

and Leases

 90 Days Past  
Due and Still  
Accruing  
 

Commercial:

  

Current  

Loans and
Leases(c) 

   Past Due       

90 Days Past      

Due and Still      
Accruing         

 
  

 

 

     
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  

30-89

    Days(c)    

   

90 Days

or More(c)

   Total
    Past Due    
   Total Loans
and Leases
   

 

Commercial loans and leases:

            

Commercial and industrial loans

$40,651  29  85  114  40,765  -           $41,495        87         94          181          41,676        4               

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 3,774  7  53  60  3,834  -            3,332        6         22          28          3,360        -               

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 3,537  11  17  28  3,565  -            3,530        2         7          9          3,539        -               

Commercial construction loans

 2,069  -  -  -  2,069  -            3,902        1         -          1          3,903        -               

Commercial leases

 3,717  3  -  3  3,720  -            3,972        -         2          2          3,974        -               

Residential mortgage loans(a)(b)

 12,109  38  134  172  12,281  56            14,790        37         81          118          14,908        49               

Consumer:

Consumer loans and leases:

            

Home equity

 8,710  100  76  176  8,886  -            7,570        68         57          125          7,695        -               

Automobile loans

 11,953  74  10  84  12,037  8            9,886        85         12          97          9,983        9               

Credit card

 2,335  34  32  66  2,401  23            2,183        28         26          54          2,237        22               

Other consumer loans and leases

 417  1  -  1  418  -            679        1         -          1          680        -               

 

Total portfolio loans and leases(a)

$         89,272  297  407  704  89,976  87           $            91,339        315         301          616          91,955        84               

 
(a)

Excludes$108143 of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value.value atDecember 31, 2016.

(b)

Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for current residentialGNMA mortgage loans includes loanspools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. As ofDecember 31, 2014,2016,$99110 of these loans were30-89 days past due and$373312 were 90 days or more past due. The Bancorp recognized$146 of losses forduring the year endedDecember 31, 20142016 due to claim denials and curtailments associated with these insured or guaranteed loans.

(c)

Includes accrual and nonaccrual loans and leases.

 

 

 
  

 

                             Past Due                            

       

Current  

Loans and

Leases(c) 

   Past Due       

90 Days Past      

Due and Still      
Accruing         

 
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)Current
Loans and
Leases(c)
 30-89
Days(c)
 

90 Days

and

Greater(c)

 Total
Past Due
 Total Loans
and Leases
 90 Days Past  
Due and Still  
Accruing  
 

   

 

 

     

Commercial:

As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)  

Current  

Loans and

Leases(c) 

   

30-89

    Days(c)    

   

90 Days

or More(c)

   Total
    Past Due    
   Total Loans
and Leases
   

90 Days Past      

Due and Still      
Accruing         

 

Commercial loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

$39,118  53  145  198  39,316  -           $41,996        55         80          135          42,131        7               

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 4,423  15  69  84  4,507  -            3,610        15         34          49          3,659        -               

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 3,515  9  35  44  3,559  -            3,262        9         27          36          3,298        -               

Commercial construction loans

 1,010  -  29  29  1,039  -            3,214        -         -          -          3,214        -               

Commercial leases

 3,620  -  5  5  3,625  -            3,850        3         1          4          3,854        -               

Residential mortgage loans(a)(b)

 12,284  73  231  304  12,588  66            13,420        37         92          129          13,549        40               

Consumer:

Consumer loans and leases:

            

Home equity

 9,058  102  86  188  9,246  -            8,158        82         61          143          8,301        -               

Automobile loans

 11,919  55  10  65  11,984  8            11,407        75         11          86          11,493        10               

Credit card

 2,225  36  33  69  2,294  29            2,207        29         23          52          2,259        18               

Other consumer loans and leases

 362  2  -  2  364  -            656        1         -          1          657        -               

 

 

Total portfolio loans and leases(a)

$        87,534  345  643  988  88,522  103           $            91,780        306         329          635          92,415        75               

 

 
(a)

Excludes $92$167 of residential mortgage loans measured at fair value.value at December 31, 2015.

(b)

Information includes advances made pursuant to servicing agreements for current residentialGNMA mortgage loans includes loanspools whose repayments are insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. As of December 31, 2013, $812015, $102 of these loans were30-89 days past due and $378$335 were 90 days or more past due. The Bancorp recognized $5$8 of losses forduring the year ended December 31, 20132015 due to claim denials and curtailments associated with these insured or guaranteed loans.

(c)

Includes accrual and nonaccrual loans and leases.

107  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Impaired Portfolio Loans and Leases

Larger commercial loans and leases included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment. The Bancorp also performs an individual review on loans and leases that are restructured in a TDR. The

Bancorp considers the current value of collateral, credit quality of any guarantees, the loan structure and other factors when

evaluating whether an individual loan or lease is impaired. Other factors may include the geography and industry of the borrower, size and financial condition of the borrower, cash flow and leverage of the borrower and the Bancorp’s evaluation of the borrower’s management. Smaller balanceSmaller-balance homogenous loans or leases that are collectively evaluated for impairment are not included in the following tables.

 

 

119  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following tables summarize the Bancorp’s impaired portfolio loans and leases, (by class)by class, that were subject to individual review, which includes all portfolio loans and leases restructured in a TDR as of December 31:

 

 

 

2014

($ in millions)

Unpaid 
Principal
Balance 
 Recorded 
Investment
 ALLL         
2016 ($ in millions)  Unpaid  
Principal
Balance 
   Recorded
Investment
 ALLL       

 

 

With a related ALLL recorded:

Commercial:

With a related ALLL:

     

Commercial loans and leases:

     

Commercial and industrial loans

$598  486    149           $440    414    94     

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(b)

 54  46    14            24    16    5     

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 69  57    4            7       1     

Commercial construction loans

 18  15    -         

Commercial leases

 3     2            2       -     

Restructured residential mortgage loans

 388  383    65            471    465    68     

Restructured consumer:

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

     

Home equity

 203  201    42            202    201    30     

Automobile loans

 19  19    3            12    12    2     

Credit card

 78  78    16            52    52    12     

 

 

Total impaired loans and leases with a related ALLL

$            1,430  1,288    295         

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with a related ALLL

  $            1,210    1,168    212     

 

 

With no related ALLL recorded:

Commercial:

With no related ALLL:

     

Commercial loans and leases:

     

Commercial and industrial loans

$311  276    -           $394    320    -     

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 72  68    -            36    35    -     

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 251  231    -            93    83    -     

Commercial construction loans

 48  48    -         

Commercial leases

 2     -            2       -     

Restructured residential mortgage loans

 155  135    -            207    187    -     

Restructured consumer:

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

     

Home equity

 183  180    -            107    104    -     

Automobile loans

 5     -            3       -     

 

 

Total impaired loans and leases with no related ALLL

 1,027  945    -         

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with no related ALLL

  $842    733    -     

 

 

Total impaired loans and leases

$2,457  2,233 (a)  295         

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases

  $2,052    1,901(a)   212   

 

 
(a)

Includes$869322, $485$635 and$420323, respectively, of commercial, residential mortgage and consumer portfolio TDRs on accrual status;status and$214192,$3317 and$6348, respectively, of commercial, residential mortgage and consumer portfolio TDRs on nonaccrual status.status atDecember 31, 2016.

(b)

Excludes five restructured nonaccrual loans atDecember 31, 20142016 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with an unpaid principal balance of$2826, a recorded investment of$2826, and an allowanceALLL of$1018.

 

108120  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

2013

($ in millions)

 

  Unpaid
      Principal    
  Balance

 Recorded
    Investment    
     ALLL         

With a related ALLL recorded:

Commercial:

 
2015 ($ in millions)      Unpaid
  Principal  
Balance
       Recorded
      Investment  
       ALLL     

 

With a related ALLL:

          

Commercial loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

$870          759         145           $    412         346          84   

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(b)

 85          74         11              28         21          5   

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 154          134         14              75         64          12   

Commercial construction loans

 68          54         5              4         4          2   

Commercial leases

 12          12         -              3         3          1   

Restructured residential mortgage loans

 1,081          1,052         139              450         444          67   

Restructured consumer:

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

          

Home equity

 377          373         39              226         225          32   

Automobile loans

 23          23         3              17         16          2   

Credit card

 59          58         11              61         61          15   

Total impaired loans and leases with a related ALLL

$          2,729          2,539         367         

With no related ALLL recorded:

Commercial:

 

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with a related ALLL

  $    1,276         1,184          220   

 

With no related ALLL:

          

Commercial loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

$181          177         -           $    228         182          -   

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 106          98         -              54         51          -   

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 154          147         -              126         111          -   

Commercial construction loans

 77          63         -              9         5          -   

Commercial leases

 14          14         -              1         1          -   

Restructured residential mortgage loans

 313          273         -              210         186          -   

Restructured consumer:

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

          

Home equity

 43          39         -              122         119          -   

Automobile loans

 3          3         -              3         3          -   

Total impaired loans and leases with no related ALLL

 891          814         -         

Total impaired loans and leases

$3,620          3,353 (a)     367         

 

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases with no related ALLL

  $    753         658          -   

 

Total impaired portfolio loans and leases

  $    2,029         1,842 (a)      220   

 
(a)

Includes $869, $1,241$491, $607 and $444,$372, respectively, of commercial, residential mortgage and consumer portfolio TDRs on accrual status; $228, $84status and $203, $23 and $52, respectively, of commercial, residential mortgage and consumer portfolio TDRs on nonaccrual status.status at December 31, 2015.

(b)

Excludes five restructured nonaccrual loans at December 31, 20132015 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with an unpaid principal balance of $28,$27, a recorded investment of $28,$27 and an allowanceALLL of $11.$15.

The following table summarizes the Bancorp’s average impaired portfolio loans and leases, (by class)by class, and interest income, (by class)by class, for the yearyears ended December 31:

 

 
     2016   2015   2014     
2014   2013 2012     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
($ in millions)    Average
    Recorded
    Investment
     Interest  
    Income  
    Recognized  
       Average
    Recorded
    Investment
     Interest 
    Income 
    Recognized 
     Average
    Recorded
    Investment
     Interest       
    Income       
     Recognized       
      Average
Recorded
    Investment    
   Interest
Income
  Recognized  
   Average
Recorded
  Investment  
   Interest
Income
   Recognized   
   Average
Recorded
    Investment    
   Interest
Income
  Recognized  
     

Commercial:

 

Commercial loans and leases:

                

Commercial and industrial loans

$786     25       517      16  448      4         $   691           10          663          21     786            25   

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(a)

 149     4       146      4  156      4            63           1          92              149            4   

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 268     8       321      8  361      10            139           5          224              268            8   

Commercial construction loans

 92     2       108      4  160      2            3           -          41              92            2   

Commercial leases

 13     -       11      -  10      -            5           -          5              13            -   

Restructured residential mortgage loans

 1,273     54       1,311      53  1,276      47            647           25          586          23     1,273            54   

Restructured consumer:

Restructured consumer loans and leases:

                

Home equity

 394     20       429      23  439      24            325           12          361          13     394            20   

Automobile loans

 24     1       29      1  38      1            17           -          22              24            1   

Credit card

 62     5       68      4  80      4            56           5          68              62            5   

Other consumer loans and leases

 -     -        2      -  1      -       

Total impaired loans and leases

$        3,061     119        2,942      113  2,969      96       

 

Total average impaired portfolio loans and leases

  $   1,946           58          2,062          74     3,061            119   

 
(a)

Excludes five restructured nonaccrual loans atDecember 31, 2014associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party, with an average recorded investment of$2826, $27 and $28 for the years endedDecember 31, 20142016, 2015 and 2013 and an2014, respectively. An immaterial amount of interest income was recognized forduring the years endedDecember 31, 20142016, 2015 and 2013.2014.

 

109121  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and leases for which ultimate collectability of the full amount of the principal and/or interest is uncertain; restructured commercial and credit card TDRsloans which have not yet met the requirements to be classified as a performing asset; restructured consumer TDRsloans which are 90 days past due based on the restructured terms unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection; and certain other assets, including OREO and other repossessed property. The following table summarizespresents the Bancorp’s nonperformingnonaccrual loans and leases, by class, and OREO and other repossessed property as of December 31:

 

($ in millions)2014             2013               2016      2015    

Commercial:

Commercial loans and leases:

        

Commercial and industrial loans

$228            281             $478      259   

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(a)

 78            95              32      46   

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 57            48              9      35   

Commercial construction loans

 -            29           

Commercial leases

 4            5              4      1   

Total commercial loans and leases

 367            458           

Total nonaccrual portfolio commercial loans and leases

   523      341   

Residential mortgage loans

 77            166              34      51   

Consumer:

Consumer loans and leases:

        

Home equity

 93            93              73      79   

Automobile loans

 1            1              2      2   

Credit card

 41            33              28      33   

Total consumer loans and leases

 135            127           

Total nonperforming loans and leases(b)(c)

$              579            751           

OREO and other repossessed property(d)

 165                        229           

Total nonaccrual portfolio consumer loans and leases

   103      114   

Total nonaccrual portfolio loans and leases(b)(c)

  $660      506   

OREO and other repossessed property

   78      141   

Total nonperforming portfolio assets(b)(c)

  $        738      647   

(a)

Excludes$2119 and $20 of restructured nonaccrual loans atDecember 31, 20142016and 2013 2015, respectively,associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due the risk being assumed by a third party.

(b)

Excludes$3913and $6$12 of nonaccrual loans held for sale atDecember 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively.

(c)

Includes$94and $10$6 of nonaccrual government insured commercial loans whose repayments are insured by the SBA atDecember 31, 20142016and 2013,2015, respectively, and$41 and $2 of restructured nonaccrual government insured commercial loans atDecember 31, 20142016 and 2013, respectively.

(d)

Excludes$71 and $77 of OREO related to government insured loans atDecember 31, 2014 and 2013,2015, respectively.

 

The Bancorp’s recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction was $260 million and $303 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

If a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, the Bancorp may consider, in certain circumstances, modifying the terms of their loan to maximize collection of amounts due. Within each of the Bancorp’s loan classes, TDRs typically involve either a reduction of the stated interest rate of the loan, an extension of the loan’s maturity date(s)date with a stated rate lower than the current market rate for a new loan with similar risk, or in limited circumstances, a reduction of the principal balance of the loan or the loan’s accrued interest. Modifying the terms of a loan may result in an increase or decrease to the ALLL depending upon the terms modified, the method used to measure the ALLL for a loan prior to modification, and whether any charge-offs were recorded on the loan before or at the time of modification. Refer to the ALLL section of Note 1 for information on the Bancorp’s ALLL methodology. Upon modification of a loan, the Bancorp measures

the related impairment as the difference between the estimated future cash

flows expected to be collected on the modified loan, discounted at the original effective yield of the loan, and the carrying value of the loan. The resulting measurement may result in the need for minimal or no valuation allowance because it is probable that all cash flows will be collected under the modified terms of the loan. In addition, if the stated interest rate was increased in a TDR, the cash flows on the modified loan, using thepre-modification interest rate as the discount rate, often exceed the recorded investment of the loan. Conversely, upon a modification that reduces the stated interest rate on a loan, the Bancorp recognizes an impairment loss as an increase to the ALLL.

If a TDR involves a reduction of the principal balance of the loan or the loan’s accrued interest, that amount ischarged-off to the ALLL.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013,2016, the Bancorp had $89$82 million and $86$57 million in line of credit and letter of credit commitments, respectively, compared to $39 million and $23 million in line of credit and letter of credit commitments as of December 31, 2015, respectively, to lend additional funds to borrowers whose terms have been modified in a TDR.

 

 

110122  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following tables provide a summary of loans, by class, modified in a TDR by the Bancorp during the years ended December 31:

 

2014 ($ in millions)(a) Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the year(b)
 

Recorded investment
in loans modified

in a TDR

during the year

 Increase
(Decrease)
to ALLL upon
modification
 Charge-offs    
recognized upon    
modification    
 

Commercial:

    

2016 ($ in millions)(a)

  Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the year(b)
    

Recorded investment
in loans modified

in a TDR

during the year

    Increase
to ALLL upon
modification
    

Charge-offs    

recognized upon    

modification    

Commercial loans and leases:

              

Commercial and industrial loans

  128   $            230     12        6           74    $              183      14          -          

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

  32   54     (1)        -            12    11      -          -          

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

  28   30     (3)        2           4    5      2          -          

Commercial leases

  5    16      -          -          

Residential mortgage loans

  1,093   160     8        -            924    137      8          -          

Consumer:

    

Consumer loans:

              

Home equity

  284   12     -         -            219    15      -          -          

Automobile loans

  608   10     1        -            221    3      -          -          

Credit card

  8,929   52     10        -            9,519    43      8          4          

Total portfolio loans and leases

  11,102   $            548     27        8           10,978    $              413      32          4          

    
2013 ($ in millions)(a) Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the year(b)
 

Recorded investment

in loans modified

in a TDR

during the year

 

Increase
(Decrease)

to ALLL upon
modification

 Charge-offs    
recognized upon    
modification    
 

Commercial:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

 146  $            604    39       44         

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans(c)

 65  19    (2)        -          

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 59  72    (7)        -          

Commercial construction loans

 4  34    (2)        -          

Commercial leases

 1  2    (5)        -          

Residential mortgage loans

 1,620  249    28        -          

Consumer:

    

Home equity

 695  37    (1)        -          

Automobile loans

 499  14    1        -          

Credit card

 8,202  50    7        -          

Total portfolio loans and leases

 11,291  $         1,081    58       44         
    
2012 ($ in millions)(a) 

Number of loans

modified in a TDR

during the year(b)

 

Recorded investment

in loans modified

in a TDR

during the year

 Increase
(Decrease)
to ALLL upon
modification
 Charge-offs    
recognized upon    
modification    
 

Commercial:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

 108  $              84    (7)       9         

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 67  53    (8)       2         

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 67  91    (7)        -          

Commercial construction loans

 17  38    (4)        -          

Commercial leases

 8  7    1        -          

Residential mortgage loans

 1,758  340    35        -          

Consumer:

    

Home equity

 1,343  82    1        -          

Automobile loans

 1,289  23    2        -          

Credit card

 11,407  75    11        -          

Total portfolio loans and leases

 16,064  $            793    24       11         
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.quality which were accounted for within a pool.

(b)

Represents number of loans post-modification.post-modification and excludes loans previously modified in a TDR.

 

2015 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the year(b)
    

Recorded investment
in loans modified
in a TDR

during the year

    Increase
(Decrease)
to ALLL upon
modification
    

Charge-offs    

recognized upon    

modification    

 

Commercial loans:

              

Commercial and industrial loans

  77    $                146      7        3          

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

  18    16      (2)       -          

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

  12    7      (1)       -          

Residential mortgage loans

  1,089    155      8        -          

Consumer loans:

              

Home equity

  267    16      (1)       -          

Automobile loans

  440    7      1        -          

Credit card

  12,569    62      11        7          

 

Total portfolio loans

  14,472    $                409      23        10          

 

(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality which were accounted for within a pool.

(c)(b)

Represents number of loans post-modification and excludes loans previously modified in a TDR.

 

2014 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of loans
modified in a TDR
during the year(b)
    

Recorded investment
in loans modified

in a TDR

during the year

    Increase
(Decrease)
to ALLL upon
modification
    

Charge-offs    

recognized upon    

modification    

 

Commercial loans:

              

Commercial and industrial loans

  128    $                230      12        6          

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

  32    54      (1)       -          

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

  28    30      (3)       2          

Residential mortgage loans

  1,093    160      8        -          

Consumer loans:

              

Home equity

  284    12      -        -          

Automobile loans

  608    10      1        -          

Credit card

  8,929    52      10        -          

 

Total portfolio loans

  11,102    $                548      27        8          

 

(a)

Excludes fiveall loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality which were accounted for within a pool.

(b)

Represents number of loans post-modification and excludes loans previously modified in a TDR during the year ended December 31, 2013 associated with a consolidated VIE in which the Bancorp has no continuing credit risk due to the risk being assumed by a third party. The TDR had a recorded investment of $29 at modification, ALLL increased $7 upon modification, and a charge-off of $2 was recognized upon modification.TDR.

 

The Bancorp considers TDRs that become 90 days or more past due under the modified terms as subsequently defaulted. For commercial loans not subject to individual review for impairment, loss rates that are applied for purposes of determining the allowanceALLL include historical losses associated with subsequent defaults on loans previously modified in a TDR. For consumer loans, the Bancorp performs a qualitative assessment of the adequacy of the consumer ALLL by comparing the consumer ALLL to forecasted consumer losses over the projected loss emergence period (the

forecasted losses include the impact of subsequent defaults of

consumer TDRs). When a residential mortgage, home equity, autoautomobile or other consumer loan that has been modified in a TDR subsequently defaults, the present value of expected cash flows used in the measurement of the potential impairment loss is generally limited to the expected net proceeds from the sale of the loan’s underlying collateral and any resulting impairment loss is reflected as acharge-off or an increase in ALLL. The Bancorp fully reservesrecognizes ALLL for the entire balance of the credit card loans modified in a TDR that subsequently default.

 

 

111123  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following tables provide a summary of subsequent defaultsTDRs that occurredsubsequently defaulted during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and 2013 andwere within 12twelve months of the restructuring date:

 

December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)(a)Number of
Contracts
 

Recorded

Investment

 

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial loans

 11 $36           

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 3  4           

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 2  1           

Residential mortgage loans

 235  32           

Consumer:

Home equity

 30  2           

Automobile loans

 6  -            

Credit card

 2,059  12           

Total portfolio loans and leases

 2,346 $                        87            
December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)(a)Number of
Contracts
 

Recorded

Investment

 

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial loans

 6 $11           

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 7  1           

Residential mortgage loans

 375  58           

Consumer:

Home equity

 65  4           

Automobile loans

 4  -            

Credit card

 1,768  11           

Total portfolio loans and leases

 2,225 $85           
December 31, 2012 ($ in millions)(a)Number of
Contracts
 

Recorded

Investment

 

Commercial:

Commercial and industrial loans

 2 $3           

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

 3  2           

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

 2  1           

Commercial construction loans

 2  3           

Residential mortgage loans

 332  57           

Consumer:

Home equity

 101  7           

Automobile loans

 42  -            

Credit card (revised)

 1,832  13           

Total portfolio loans and leases

 2,316 $86           
(a)

Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.

 

 
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
   

      Recorded      

      Investment      

 

 

 

Commercial loans and leases:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

   8   $5       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   2    -       

Commercial leases

   2    1       

Residential mortgage loans

   172    25       

Consumer loans:

    

Home equity

   17    1       

Automobile loans

   2    -       

Credit card

   1,715    7       

 

 

Total portfolio loans and leases

   1,918   $              39       

 

 

  (a)    Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.

 

      

  

 

 
December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)(a)  

Number of

Contracts

   

      Recorded      

      Investment      

 

 

 

Commercial loans:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

   7   $11       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3    1       

Residential mortgage loans

   156    21       

Consumer loans:

    

Home equity

   15    1       

Automobile loans

   8    -       

Credit card

   1,935    8       

 

 

Total portfolio loans

   2,124   $42       

 

 

  (a)    Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.

 

      

  

 

 
December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)(a)  Number of
Contracts
         Recorded      
      Investment      
 

 

 

Commercial loans:

    

Commercial and industrial loans

   11   $36       

Commercial mortgage owner-occupied loans

   3    4       

Commercial mortgage nonowner-occupied loans

   2    1       

Residential mortgage loans

   235    32       

Consumer loans:

    

Home equity

   30    2       

Automobile loans

   6    -       

Credit card

   2,059    12       

 

 

Total portfolio loans

   2,346   $87       

 

 

  (a)    Excludes all loans and leases held for sale and loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality.

    

 

112124  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

7. BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

 

The following istable provides a summary of bank premises and equipment atas of December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)Estimated Useful Life2014 2013    Estimated Useful Life   

 

  2016  

 2015           

 

Land and improvements(a)

    $663  685   

Buildings(a)

   2 - 30 yrs.    1,672  1,755   

Equipment

   2 - 30 yrs.    1,761  1,696   

Leasehold improvements

   1 - 30 yrs.    398  403   

Construction in progress(a)

     99  85   

Bank premises and equipment held for sale:

     

Land and improvements

$816  838       29  55   

Buildings

2 to 30 yrs. 1,810  1,763       9  20   

Equipment

1 to 30 yrs. 1,682  1,581       1  3   

Leasehold improvements

5 to 30 yrs. 416  397       -  3   

Construction in progress

 98  118  

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 (2,357 (2,166)       (2,567 (2,466)  

Total

 $            2,465  2,531  

 

Total bank premises and equipment

    $            2,065  2,239   

 
(a)

AtDecember 31, 2016 and 2015, land and improvements, buildings and construction in progress included$92and $102, respectively, associated with parcels of undeveloped land intended for future branch expansion.

 

Depreciation and amortization expense related to bank premises and equipment was $242 million, $256 million and $254 million in 2014, $245 million in 2013 and $233 million in 2012.

Atfor the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and 2013, land and improvements included $165 million and $196 million, respectively, associated with parcels of undeveloped land intended for future branch expansion. respectively.

The Bancorp monitors changing customer preferences associated with the channels it uses for banking transactions to evaluate the efficiency, competitiveness and quality of the customer service experience ofin its retail transactionconsumer distribution network. As part of this ongoing assessment, the Bancorp may determine that it is no longer fully committed to maintaining full-service branches at certain of its existing banking center locations. Similarly, the Bancorp may also determine that it is no longer fully committed to building banking centers on certain parcels of land which had previously been held for future branch expansion. In these circumstances,

On June 16, 2015, the Bancorp’s Board of Directors authorized management to pursue a plan to further develop its distribution strategy, including a plan to consolidate and/or sell certain operating branch locations and certain parcels of undeveloped land that had been acquired by the Bancorp for future branch expansion (the “Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan”). In addition, the Bancorp announced on September 13, 2016 that it had identified an additional 44 branch locations and 5 parcels of undeveloped land that it planned to consolidate or sell.

On January 29, 2016, the Bancorp closed the previously announced sale in the St. Louis MSA to Great Southern Bank and recorded a gain on the sale of $8 million in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, on April 22, 2016, the Bancorp closed the previously announced sale in the Pittsburgh MSA to First National Bank of Pennsylvania and recorded a gain on the sale of $11 million in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Both transactions were part of the Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan.

As of December 31, 2016, the Bancorp had 64 branch locations and 35 parcels of undeveloped land that had been acquired for future branch expansion that it intended to consolidate or sell. These branch locations and parcels of undeveloped land, which include unsold properties from the Branch Consolidation and Sales Plan as well as properties included in the September 13,

2016 announcement, represent $39 million, $16 million and $1 million of land and improvements, buildings and equipment, respectively, included in bank premises and equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016, of which $29 million, $9 million and $1 million, respectively, were classified as held for sale.

The Bancorp performs an assessmentassessments of the recoverability of these long-lived

assets. assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. Impairment losses associated with such assessments and lower of cost or market adjustments were $20$32 million, $6$109 million and $21$20 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. The recognized impairment losses were recorded in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

On September 29, 2016, the Bancorp closed on the sale of an office complex. The Bancorp’s assessmentsale also included all of the recoverabilityBancorp’s rights, title and interest as a landlord under existing leases in the complex. Under the terms of these asset groups requires the exercisetransaction, the Bancorp received proceeds of judgmentapproximately $31 million and entered into a lease agreement whereby the Bancorp leased-back approximately 25% of the office complex. In conjunction with the transaction, which qualified as a sale-leaseback under U.S. GAAP, the Bancorp retired assets with a net book value of approximately $10 million, recognized a deferred gain of $10 million, which is being amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the 15 year lease term, and recorded a gain on the transaction of $11 million in projectingother noninterest income in the extent and natureConsolidated Statements of their future use and the related cash flows which may be impacted by unanticipated events or circumstances.Income.

Gross occupancy expense for cancelable and noncancelable leases, which is included in net occupancy expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income, was $100 million, in$110 million and $100 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, $98 million in 2013 and $99 million in 2012,respectively, which was reduced by rental income from leased premises of $17 million in 2014, $16 million, in 2013$18 million and $17 million in 2012.during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Bancorp’s subsidiaries have entered into a number of noncancelable operating and capital lease agreements with respect to bank premises and equipment.

 

 

125  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table provides the annual future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases and capital leases atfor the years ending December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)  Noncancelable
Operating Leases
   Capital Leases     

 

 

2017

  $88     

2018

   84     

2019

   77     

2020

   65     

2021

   52     

Thereafter

   210     

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

  $                    576    19  

 

 

Less: Amounts representing interest

   -     

Present value of net minimum lease payments

   -    17  

 

 

8. OPERATING LEASE EQUIPMENT

The Bancorp performs assessments of the recoverability of long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. Total impairment losses associated with operating lease assets

were $20 million and $36 million for the years ended December 31, 2014:2016 and 2015, respectively. The recognized impairment losses were recorded in corporate banking revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 ($ in millions)Noncancelable
Operating Leases
 Capital Leases 

Year ending December 31,

2015

$92   11  

2016

 87    

2017

 79    

2018

 76    

2019

 69    

Thereafter

 294    

Total minimum lease payments

$697   37  

Less: Amounts representing interest

     

Present value of net minimum lease payments

    28  

113  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

8.9. GOODWILL

 

Business combinations entered into by the Bancorp typically include the acquisition of goodwill. Acquisition activity includes acquisitions in the respective period in addition to purchase accounting adjustments related to previous acquisitions. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Bancorp determined that the Commercial Banking and Consumer Lending reporting units’ goodwill carrying

amounts exceeded their associated implied fair values by $750 million and $215 million, respectively. The resulting $965 million goodwill impairment charge was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 and represents the total amount of accumulated impairment losses as of December 31, 2014.

Changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill, by reporting unit, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

($ in millions)  Commercial  
Banking  
   Branch      
Banking      
   Consumer        
Lending        
   Investment    
Advisors    
   Total         

Net carrying value as of December 31, 2012

  $613    1,655    -     148    2,416  

Acquisition activity

   -     -     -     -       

Net carrying value as of December 31, 2013

  $613    1,655    -     148    2,416  

Acquisition activity

   -     -     -     -       

Net carrying value as of December 31, 2014

  $                    613    1,655    -     148    2,416  

The Bancorp completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of September 30, 20142016 by performing a qualitative assessment of goodwill at the reporting unit level to determine whether any indicators of impairment existed. In performing this qualitative assessment, the Bancorp evaluated events and circumstances since

the last impairment analysis, macroeconomic conditions, banking industry and market conditions and key financial metrics of the Bancorp as well as reporting unit and overall Bancorp financial performance. After assessing the totality of the events and circumstances, the Bancorp determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair valuevalues of each of itsthe Commercial Banking, Branch Banking and Wealth and Asset Management reporting units waswere less than itstheir respective carrying amounts and, therefore, the first and second steps of the quantitative goodwill impairment test were deemed unnecessary.

 

Changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill, by reporting unit, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

114  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 
   Commercial  Branch          Consumer  Wealth and Asset           
($ in millions)  Banking  Banking         Lending  Management             Total          

 

 

Goodwill

  $                1,363   1,655    215   148              3,381  

Accumulated impairment losses

   (750  -    (215  -              (965) 

 

 

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2014

  $613   1,655    -   148              2,416  

Acquisition activity

   -   -    -   -               

 

 

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2015

  $613   1,655    -   148              2,416  

Acquisition activity

   -   -    -   -               

 

 

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2016

  $613   1,655    -   148              2,416  

 

 

9.10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles, customer lists,non-compete agreements and cardholder relationships. Intangible assets are amortized on either a straight-line or an accelerated basis

accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets have an estimated remaining weighted-average life at December 31, 20142016 of 4.54.1 years.

 

 

The details of the Bancorp’s intangible assets are shown in the following table:

 

 
  Gross Carrying   Accumulated Net Carrying         
($ in millions)Gross Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Valuation
Allowance
 Net Carrying        
Amount        
   Amount   Amortization Amount         

As of December 31, 2014

 

As of December 31, 2016

     

Core deposit intangibles

$122          (112)       -     10               $34    (27  7         

Other

 45          (40)       -     5                15    (13  2         

 

Total intangible assets

$167          (152)       -     15               $49    (40  9         

As of December 31, 2013

 

As of December 31, 2015

     

Core deposit intangibles

$154          (141)       -     13               $34    (26 8         

Other

 45          (39)       -     6                33    (29 4         

 

Total intangible assets

$                    199           (180)       -     19               $67    (55 12         

 

 

As of December 31, 2014,2016, all of the Bancorp’s intangible assets were being amortized. Amortization expense recognized on

intangible assets for both the years ended December 31,

2016 and 2015 was $2 million and amortization expense recognized on intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2014 2013 and 2012 was $4 million, $8 million and $13 million, respectively.million.

 

 

The Bancorp’s projections of amortization expense shown below are based on existing asset balances as of December 31, 2014. Future amortization expense may vary from these projections. Estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2015 through 2019 is as follows:

($ in millions)Total             

2015

$                    2             

2016

 2             

2017

 2             

2018

 2             

2019

 1             

115126  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Bancorp’s projections of amortization expense shown on the following table is based on existing asset balances as of

December 31, 2016. Future amortization expense may vary from these projections.

 

Estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2017 through 2021 is as follows:

 

 
($ in millions)                Total      

 

 

2017

  $                2   

2018

   1   

2019

   1   

2020

   1   

2021

   1   

 

 

10.11. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

 

The Bancorp, in the normal course of business, engages in a variety of activities that involve VIEs, which are legal entities that lack sufficient equity at risk to finance their activities without additional subordinated financial support or the equity investors of the entities as a group lack any of the characteristics of a controlling interest. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is generally the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities most significant to the economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. For certain investment funds, the primary beneficiary is the enterprise that will absorb a majority of the fund’s expected losses or receive a majority of the fund’s expected residual returns. The

Bancorp evaluates its interest in certain entities to determine if these entities meet the definition of a VIE and whether the Bancorp is the primary beneficiary and should consolidate the entity based on the variable interests it held both at

inception and when there is a change in circumstances that requires a reconsideration. If the Bancorp is determined to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE, it must account for the VIE as a consolidated subsidiary. If the Bancorp is determined not to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE but holds a variable interest in the entity, such variable interests are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or other accounting standards as appropriate.

 

Consolidated VIEs

The following tables provide a summary of the classifications of consolidated VIE assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interests included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of:

 

December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)Automobile Loan
Securitization

CDC        

Investments    

Total                   

Assets:

Cash and due from banks

$178  1  179                  

Commercial mortgage loans

 -   47  47                  

Automobile loans

 3,331  -               3,331                  

ALLL

 (11 (11 (22)                  

Other assets

 23  2  25                  

Total assets

$3,521   39   3,560                  

Liabilities:

Other liabilities

$5  -   5                  

Long-term debt

 3,434   -    3,434                  

Total liabilities

$                    3,439  -   3,439                  

Noncontrolling interests

 -                        39   39                  

 
December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)Automobile Loan
Securitization

CDC        

Investments    

Total                  
    Automobile Loan             CDC                   
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)    Securitizations             Investments             Total            

 

Assets:

              

Cash and due from banks

$49  -     49                      $84                           1                   85          

Commercial mortgage loans

 -     48  48                       -                           46                   46          

Automobile loans

 1,010  -     1,010                       1,170                           -                   1,170          

ALLL

 (2 (13 (15)                       (6)                          (20)                  (26)         

Other assets

 11  2  13                       9                           -                   9          
$1,068   37   1,105                  

 

Total assets

    $1,257                           27                   1,284          

 

Liabilities:

              

Other liabilities

$1  -     1                      $3                           -                   3          

Long-term debt

 1,048  -     1,048                       1,094                           -                   1,094          

 

Total liabilities

$1,049   -      1,049                      $                1,097                            -                   1,097          

 

Noncontrolling interests

$-      37   37                      $-                           27                   27          

 
              

 
    Automobile Loan             CDC                   
December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)    Securitizations             Investments             Total            

 

Assets:

              

Cash and due from banks

    $151                           1                   152          

Commercial mortgage loans

     -                           47                   47          

Automobile loans

     2,490                           -                   2,490          

ALLL

     (11)                          (17)                  (28)         

Other assets(a)

     14                           -                   14          

 

Total assets(a)

    $2,644                           31                   2,675          

 

Liabilities:

              

Other liabilities

    $3                           -                   3          

Long-term debt(a)

     2,487                           -                   2,487          

 

Total liabilities(a)

    $2,490                           -                   2,490          

 

Noncontrolling interests

    $-                           31                   31          

 
(a)

Upon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $6 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information refer to Note 1.

 

Automobile Loan Securitizationloan securitizations

In securitization transactions that occurred during 2014the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2013,2014, the Bancorp transferred an aggregate amount of $3.8 billion$750 million and $1.3$3.8 billion, respectively, in consumer automobile loans to bankruptcy remote trusts which were deemed to be VIEs. The primary purposes of the VIEs were

to issue asset-backed securities with varying levels of credit subordination and payment priority, as well as residual interests, and to provide the Bancorp with access to liquidity for its originated loans. The Bancorp retained residual interests in the VIEs and, therefore, has an obligation to absorb losses and a right to receive benefits from the VIEs that could potentially be significant to the VIEs.

127  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In addition, the Bancorp retained servicing rights for the underlying loans and, therefore, holds the power to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIEs. As a result, the Bancorp concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of the VIEs and, therefore, has consolidated these VIEs. The assets of

the VIEs are restricted to the settlement of the notesasset-backed securities and other obligations of the VIEs. Third-party holders of the notes do not have recourse to the general assets of the Bancorp.

The economic performance of the VIEs is most significantly impacted by the performance of the underlying loans. The principal risks to which the VIEs are exposed include credit risk and prepayment risk. The credit and prepayment risks are managed through credit enhancements in the form of reserve accounts, overcollateralization, excess interest on the loans and the subordination of certain classes of asset-backed securities to other classes.

CDC Investmentsinvestments

CDC, a wholly ownedwholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Bancorp, was created to invest in projects to create affordable housing, revitalize business and residential areas and preserve historic landmarks.

116  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CDC generallyco-invests with other unrelated companies and/or individuals and typically makes investments in a separate legal entity that owns the property under development. The entities are usually formed as limited partnerships and LLCs and CDC typically invests as a limited partner/investor member in the form of equity contributions. The economic performance of the VIEs is driven by the performance of their underlying investment projects

as well as the VIEs’ ability to operate in compliance with the rules and regulations necessary for the qualification of tax credits generated by equity investments. Typically, the general partner or managing member will be the party that has the right to make decisions that will most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity. The Bancorp’s subsidiaries serve as the managing member of certain LLCs invested in business revitalization projects.projects and have the right to make decisions that most significantly impact the economic performance of the LLCs. Additionally, the investor members do not own substantivekick-out rights or substantive participating rights over the managing member. The Bancorp has provided an indemnification guarantee to the investor member of these LLCs related to the qualification of tax credits

generated by the investor members’ investment. Accordingly, the Bancorp concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and, therefore, has consolidated these VIEs. As a result, the investor members’ interests in these VIEs are presented as noncontrolling interests in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements. This presentation includes reporting separately the equity attributable to the noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity and reporting separately the comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Bancorp’s maximum exposure related to these indemnifications at December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 was $24$31 million and $21$27 million, respectively, which is based on an amount required to meet the investor members’member’s defined target rate of return.

 

 

Non-consolidated VIEs

The following tables provide a summary of assets and liabilities carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheets related tonon-consolidated VIEs for which the Bancorp holds an interest, but is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE, as well as the Bancorp’s maximum exposure to losses associated with its interests in the entities as of:

 

December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)

Total    

Assets  

       Total
Liabilities
       Maximum            
Exposure             
 

 
    Total     Total             Maximum     
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)    Assets     Liabilities             Exposure     

 

CDC investments

$1,432  364        1,432                   $            1,421                357                  1,421     

Private equity investments

 189  -         267                    176                -                  232     

Loans provided to VIEs

                 1,900  -         2,759                    1,735                -                  2,672     

Automobile loan securitization

 2     -            2               

 
              
December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)

 

Total    

Assets  

       Total
Liabilities
       Maximum            
Exposure             
 

 
    Total     Total             Maximum     
December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)    Assets     Liabilities             Exposure     

 

CDC investments

$1,436  407        1,436                   $1,455                367                  1,455     

Private equity investments

 204  -         294                    211                -                  271     

Loans provided to VIEs

 1,830  -         2,792                    1,630                -                  2,599     

Automobile loan securitization

 4  -         4               

Restructured loans

 1     -            1               

 

 

CDC Investmentsinvestments

As noted previously, CDC typically invests in VIEs as a limited partner or investor member in the form of equity contributions.contributions and has no substantivekick-out or substantive participating rights over the managing member. The Bancorp has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs because it lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the underlying project or the VIEs’ ability to operate in compliance with the rules and regulations necessary for the qualification of tax credits generated by equity investments. This power is held by the general partners/managing members who exercise full and exclusive control of the operations of the VIEs. Accordingly, the Bancorp accounts for these investments under the equity method of accounting.

The Bancorp’s funding requirements are limited to its invested capital and any additional unfunded commitments for future equity contributions. The Bancorp’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the VIEs is limited to the carrying amounts of the investments, including the unfunded

commitments. The carrying amounts of these investments, which are included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the liabilities related to the unfunded commitments, which are included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are included in the previous tables for all periods presented. The Bancorp has no other liquidity arrangements or obligations to purchase assets of the VIEs that would expose the Bancorp to a loss. In certain arrangements, the general partner/managing member of the VIE has guaranteed a

level of projected tax credits to be received by the limited partners/investor members, thereby minimizing a portion of the Bancorp’s risk.

        At both December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Bancorp’s CDC investments included $1.3 billion of investments in affordable housing tax credits recognized in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The unfunded commitments related to these investments were $349 million and $356 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The unfunded commitments as of December 31, 2016 are expected to be funded from 2017 to 2033.

128  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Bancorp has accounted for all of its investments in qualified affordable housing tax credits using the equity method of accounting. The following table summarizes the impact to the Consolidated Statements of Income relating to investments in qualified affordable housing investments:

 

 
   Consolidated Statements of             
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)  Income Caption  2016  2015          2014            

 

 

Pre-tax investment and impairment losses(a)

  Other noninterest expense  $                144   126   118  

Tax credits and other benefits

  Applicable income tax expense   (220  (205  (185 

 

 
(a)

The Bancorp did not recognize impairment losses resulting from the forfeiture or ineligibility of tax credits or other circumstances during the years endedDecember 31, 2016,2015 and 2014.

Private Equity Investmentsequity investments

The Bancorp, through Fifth Third Capital Holdings, a wholly ownedwholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Bancorp, invests as a limited partner in private equity fundsinvestments which provide the Bancorp an opportunity to obtain higher rates of return on invested capital, while also creating cross-selling opportunities for the Bancorp’s commercial products. Each of the limited partnerships has an unrelated third-party general partner responsible for appointing the fund manager. The Bancorp has not been appointed fund manager for any of these private equity funds.investments. The funds finance primarily all of their activities from the partners’ capital contributions and investment returns. Under the VIE consolidation guidance still applicable to the funds, theThe Bancorp has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the funds because it does not have the obligation to absorb a majority of the funds’ expected losses or the right to receive a majority of the funds’ expected residual returns.returns that could potentially be significant to the funds and lacks the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the funds. The Bancorp, as a limited partner, does not have substantive participating or substantivekick-out rights over the general partner. Therefore, the Bancorp accounts for its investments in these limited partnerships under the equity method of accounting.

The Bancorp is exposed to losses arising from the negative performance of the underlying investments in the private equity funds.investments. As a limited partner, the Bancorp’s maximum exposure to loss is limited to the carrying amounts of the investments plus unfunded commitments. The carrying amounts of these

117  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

investments, which are included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are included in the previous tables. Also, as ofat December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the unfunded commitment amounts to the funds were $78$56 million and $90$60 million, respectively. TheAs part of previous commitments, the Bancorp made capital contributions of $27 million and $31 million to private equity fundsinvestments of $14 million and $30 million during 2014the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Additionally, in response to the issuanceThe Bancorp recognized $9 million and

$1 million of OTTI primarily associated with certain nonconforming investments affected by the Volcker Rule induring the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bancorp recognized $4 million of OTTI on its investments in private equity funds during 2013.years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Bancorp recognized nodid not recognize any OTTI on its investments in private equity funds during the year ended December 31, 2014. Refer to Note 27 for further information.

Loans Providedprovided to VIEs

The Bancorp has provided funding to certain unconsolidated VIEs sponsored by third parties. These VIEs are generally established to finance certain consumer and small business loans originated by third parties. The entities are primarily funded through the issuance of a loan from the Bancorp or syndication through which the Bancorp is involved. The sponsor/administrator of the entities is responsible for servicing the underlying assets in the VIEs. Because the sponsor/administrator, not the Bancorp, holds the servicing responsibilities, which include the establishment and employment of default mitigation policies and procedures, the Bancorp does not hold the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity and, therefore, is not the primary beneficiary.

The principal risk to which these entities are exposed is credit risk related to the underlying assets. The Bancorp’s maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying amounts of the loans and unfunded commitments to the VIEs. The Bancorp’s outstanding loans to these VIEs are included in commercial loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are included in the previous tables for all periods presented.Note 5. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp’s unfunded commitments to these entities were $859$937 million and $962$969 million, respectively. The loans and unfunded commitments to these VIEs are included in the Bancorp’s overall analysis of the ALLL and reserve for unfunded commitments, respectively. The Bancorp does not provide any implicit or explicit liquidity guarantees or principal value guarantees to these VIEs.

Automobile Loan Securitization

In March of 2013, the Bancorp recognized an immaterial loss on the securitization and sale of certain automobile loans with a carrying amount of approximately $509 million. The securitization and the resulting sale of all underlying securities qualified for sale accounting. The Bancorp has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the trust because it has neither the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE nor the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Bancorp is not required and does not currently intend to provide any additional financial support to the trust. Investors and creditors only have recourse to the assets held by the trust. The interest the Bancorp holds in the VIE relates to servicing rights that are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying value of the servicing asset.

Restructured Loans

As part of loan restructuring efforts, the Bancorp received equity capital from certain borrowers to facilitate the restructuring of the borrower’s loans. These borrowers meet the definition of a VIE because the Bancorp was involved in their refinancing and because their equity capital at risk was insufficient to fund ongoing operations. The Bancorp accounted for its equity capital

investments in these VIEs under the equity method or cost method of accounting based on its percentage of ownership and ability to exercise significant influence.

The Bancorp’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with these VIEs was limited to the equity capital investments, the principal and accrued interest on the outstanding loans, and any unfunded commitments. The Bancorp had outstanding loans to these VIEs included in commercial loans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bancorp had no unfunded loan commitments to these VIEs as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. The loans to these VIEs are included in the Bancorp’s overall analysis of the ALLL. The Bancorp does not provide any implicit or explicit liquidity guarantees or principal value guarantees to these VIEs.

 

 

118

129  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

11.12. SALES OF RECEIVABLES AND SERVICING RIGHTS

 

AutomobileResidential Mortgage TDR Loan SecuritizationSale

In March of 2013,2015, the Bancorp recognized an immaterial lossa $37 million gain, included in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income, on the securitization and sale of certain automobileHFS residential mortgage loans with a carrying amountvalue of approximately $509 million. The$568 million that were previously modified in a TDR. As part of this sale, the Bancorp utilized a securitization trust to facilitateprovided certain standard representations and warranties which have expired. Additionally, the securitization process. The trust issued asset-backed securities inBancorp did not obtain servicing responsibilities on the formsales of notes and equity certificates, with varying levels of credit subordination and payment priority. The Bancorp does not hold any of the notes or equity certificates issued by the trust,these loans and the investors in these securities have no credit recourse to the Bancorp’s other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due. As part of the sale, the Bancorp obtained servicing

responsibilities and recognized a servicing asset with an initial fair value of $6 million.

Residential Mortgage Loan Sales

The Bancorp sold fixed and adjustable rateadjustable-rate residential mortgage loans during 2014, 2013the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2012.2014. In those sales, the Bancorp obtained servicing responsibilities and provided certain standard representations and warranties, however the investors have no recourse to the Bancorp’s other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due. The Bancorp receives annual servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding balance. The Bancorp identifies classes of servicing assets based on financial asset type and interest rates.

 

Information related to residential mortgage loan sales and the Bancorp’s mortgage banking activity, which is included in mortgage banking net revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income, for the years ended December 31 is as follows:

 

 
($ in millions)  2014        2013       2012           2016   2015                  2014       

Residential mortgage loan sales

  $          5,467      21,529      21,574       

 

Residential mortgage loan sales(a)

  $        6,927            5,078  (b)    5,467   

Origination fees and gains on loan sales

   153      453      821          186            171     153   

Gross mortgage servicing fees

   246      251      250          199            222     246   

 
(a)

Represents the unpaid principal balance at the time of the sale.

(b)

Excludes $568 of HFS residential mortgage loans previously modified in a TDR that were sold during the first quarter of 2015.

Servicing Rights

The following table presents changes in the servicing rights related to residential mortgage and automobile loans for the years ended December 31:

 

($ in millions)  2014     2013           

Carrying amount before valuation allowance as of the beginning of the period

  $          1,440    1,358         

Servicing rights that result from the transfer of residential mortgage loans

   73    244         

Servicing rights that result from the transfer of automobile loans

   -    6         

Amortization

   (121   (168)         

Carrying amount before valuation allowance

   1,392    1,440         

Valuation allowance for servicing rights:

    

Beginning balance

   (469   (661)         

(Provision for) recovery of MSR impairment

   (65   192         

Ending balance

   (534   (469)         

Carrying amount as of the end of the period

  $858    971         

 

 
($ in millions)  2016   2015        

 

 

Carrying amount before valuation allowance:

      

Balance, beginning of period

  $            1,204             1,392   

Servicing rights that result from the transfer of residential mortgage loans

   83             63     

Amortization

   (131)            (140)   

Other-than-temporary impairment

   -             (111)   

 

 

Balance, end of period

  $1,156             1,204   

 

 

Valuation allowance for servicing rights:

      

Balance, beginning of period

  $(419)            (534)   

Recovery of MSR impairment

   7                

Other-than-temporary impairment

   -             111    

 

 

Balance, end of period

   (412)            (419)   

 

 

Carrying amount after valuation allowance

  $744             785   

 

 

 

Amortization expense recognized on servicing rights forrightsfor the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 was $121$131 million, $168$140 million and $186$121 million, respectively. The Bancorp’s projections of

projections of amortization expense shown below are based on existing asset balances and static key economic assumptions as of December 31, 2014.2016. Future amortization expense may vary from these projections.

 

 

Estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 20152017 through 20192021 is as follows:

 

 
($ in millions)  Total            Total     

2015

  $          125           

2016

   113           

 

2017

   103             $            142       

2018

   93              124       

2019

   85              109       

2020

   96       

2021

   84       

 

 

Temporary impairment or impairment recovery, affectedeffected through a change in the MSR valuation allowance, is captured as a component of mortgage banking net revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Other-than-temporary impairment recognized through awrite-off of the servicing right and related valuation allowance is captured as a component of servicing rights on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bancorp maintains anon-qualifying hedging strategy to manage a portion of the risk

associated with changes in the value of the MSR portfolio. This strategy includes the purchase of free-standing derivatives and variousavailable-for-sale securities. The

interest income,mark-to-market adjustments and gain or loss from sale activities associated with these portfolios are expected to economically hedge a portion of the change in value of the MSR portfolio caused by fluctuating discount rates,OAS spreads, earnings rates and prepayment speeds. The fair value of the servicing asset is based on the present value of expected future cash flows.

 

 

119  Fifth Third Bancorp

130  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following table displays the beginning and ending fair value of the servicing rights for the years ended December 31:

 

($ in millions)2014       2013           

Fixed-rate residential mortgage loans:

Beginning balance

$              929      664         

Ending balance

 823      929         

Adjustable rate residential mortgage loans:

Beginning balance

 38      33         

Ending balance

 33      38         

Fixed-rate automobile loans:

Beginning balance

 4      -         

Ending balance

 2      4         

 

 
($ in millions)  2016   2015      

 

 

Fixed-rate residential mortgage loans:

      

Balance, beginning of period

  $            757            823   

Balance, end of period

   722            757   

Adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans:

      

Balance, beginning of period

   27            33   

Balance, end of period

   22            27   

Fixed-rate automobile loans:

      

Balance, beginning of period

   1            2   

Balance, end of period

   -            1   

 

 

The following table presents activity related to valuations of the MSR portfolio and the impact of thenon-qualifying hedging strategy, which is included in mortgage banking net revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31:

 

($ in millions)  2014       2013       2012           

Securities gains, net - non-qualifying hedges on MSRs

$              -         13      3         

Changes in fair value and settlement of free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge the MSR portfolio (Mortgage banking net revenue)

 95      (30)      63         

(Provision for) recovery of MSR impairment (Mortgage banking net revenue)

  (65)      192      (103)         

 

 
($ in millions)    2016     2015     2014    

 

 

Changes in fair value and settlement of free-standing derivatives purchased to economically hedge the MSR portfolio

     24      90      95  

Recovery of (provision for) MSR impairment

     7      4      (65 

 

 

As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the key economic assumptions used in measuring the interests in residential mortgage loans that continued to be held by the Bancorp at the date of sale or securitization resulting from transactions completed during the years ended December 31 were as follows:

 

 
 2016 2015 
   Weighted-           Weighted-         

 Average Prepayment   Weighted- Average Prepayment   Weighted- 
 20142013 Life Speed OAS Spread Average Life Speed OAS Spread Average 
 Rate 

 

Weighted-

Average Life

(in years)

 

Prepayment

Speed (annual)

 

Discount Rate

(annual)

 

Weighted-

Average

Default Rate

 

Weighted-

Average Life

(in years)

 

Prepayment

Speed (annual)

 

Discount Rate

(annual)

 

Weighted-

Average

Default Rate

 Rate (in years) (annual) (bps) Default Rate (in years) (annual) (bps) Default Rate 

 

Residential mortgage loans:

Residential mortgage loans:

         

Servicing rights

Fixed 6.6        11.3 %    10.0 %  N/A7.3 9.1 %    10.2 %   N/A Fixed  7.2       10.3   584       N/A       6.9      11.0  534      N/A      

Servicing rights

Adjustable 3.7        22.3        11.7      N/A3.6 22.8       11.5      N/A Adjustable  2.8       30.2    679       N/A       3.4      25.2   303      N/A      

 

 

Based on historical credit experience, expected credit losses for residential mortgage loan servicing assets have been deemed immaterial, as the Bancorp sold the majority of the underlying loans without recourse. At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp

serviced $65.4$53.6 billion and $69.2$59.0 billion, respectively, of residential mortgage loans for other investors. The value of MSRs that continue to be held by the Bancorp is subject to credit, prepayment and interest rate risks on the sold financial assets.

 

 

At December 31, 2014,2016, the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual cash flows to immediate 10%, 20% and 50% adverse changes in prepayment speed assumptions and immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in other assumptions are as follows:

 

 
     

Prepayment

Speed Assumption

 

Residual Servicing

Cash Flows

 

 
        

 

 

               Prepayment         Residual Servicing 
           

 

Impact of Adverse

               

Speed Assumption        

 

Cash Flows

 
   Weighted-   Impact of Adverse Change   Change on Fair 
 Fair Average Life (in   on Fair Value Discount Value       Fair   Weighted-
Average Life
     

Impact of Adverse Change
on Fair Value

 OAS Spread   

Impact of Adverse
Change on Fair
Value

 
($ in millions)(a)RateValue years) Rate 10% 20% 50%   Rate 10% 20%       Rate   Value   (in years)   Rate 10% 20% 50% (bps)   10% 20% 

 

 

Residential mortgage loans:

                

Servicing rights

Fixed$       823  6.0      12.0  $      (37)   (72)   (161)   9.9 $      (29)   (57)        Fixed   $     722    6.5    10.2  $(28 (55 (124 654   $(18 (35 

Servicing rights

Adjustable 33  3.1      26.2   (1)   (2)   (5)   11.8   (1)   (2)        Adjustable    22    3.2    25.3   (1 (3 (6 738    -  (1 

 

 
(a)

The impact of the weighted-average default rate on the current fair value of residual cash flows for all scenarios is immaterial.

 

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on these variations in the assumptions typically cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. The Bancorp believes variations of these levels are reasonably possible; however, there is the potential that adverse changes in key assumptions could be even greater.

Also, in the previous table, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the interests that continue to be held

by the Bancorp is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments), which might magnify or counteract these sensitivities.

 

 

120

131  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

12.13. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The Bancorp maintains an overall risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to reduce certain risks related to interest rate, prepayment and foreign currency volatility. Additionally, the Bancorp holds derivative instruments for the benefit of its commercial customers and for other business purposes. The Bancorp does not enter into unhedged speculative derivative positions.

The Bancorp’s interest rate risk management strategy involves modifying the repricing characteristics of certain financial instruments so that changes in interest rates do not adversely affect the Bancorp’s net interest margin and cash flows. Derivative instruments that the Bancorp may use as part of its interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, interest rate floors, interest rate caps, forward contracts, forward starting interest rate swaps, options and swaptions. Interest rate swap contracts are exchanges of interest payments, such as fixed-rate payments for floating-rate payments, based on a stated notional amount and maturity date. Interest rate floors protect against declining rates, while interest rate caps protect against rising interest rates. Forward contracts are contracts in which the buyer agrees to purchase, and the seller agrees to make delivery of, a specific financial instrument at a predetermined price or yield. Options provide the purchaser with the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or sell a contracted item during a specified period at an agreed upon price. Swaptions are financial instruments granting the owner the right, but not the obligation, to enter into or cancel a swap.

Prepayment volatility arises mostly from changes in fair value of the largely fixed-rate MSR portfolio, mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. The Bancorp may enter into various free-standing derivatives (principal-only swaps, interest rate swaptions, interest rate floors, mortgage options, TBAs and interest rate swaps) to economically hedge prepayment volatility. Principal-only swaps are total return swaps based on changes in the value of the underlying mortgage principal-only trust. TBAstrust.TBAs are a forward purchase agreement for a mortgage-backed securities trade whereby the terms of the security are undefined at the time the trade is made.

Foreign currency volatility occurs as the Bancorp enters into certain loans denominated in foreign currencies. Derivative instruments that the Bancorp may use to economically hedge these foreign denominated loans include foreign exchange swaps and forward contracts.

The Bancorp also enters into derivative contracts (including foreign exchange contracts, commodity contracts and interest rate contracts) for the benefit of commercial customers and other business purposes. The Bancorp may economically hedgehedges significant exposures related to these free-standing derivatives by entering into offsetting third-party contracts with approved, reputable and independent counterparties with substantially matching terms and currencies. Credit risk arises from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The Bancorp’s exposure is limited to the replacement value of the contracts rather than the notional, principal or contract amounts. Credit risk is minimized through

credit approvals, limits, counterparty collateral and monitoring procedures.

The Bancorp’s derivative assets include certain contractual features in which the Bancorp requires the counterparties to provide collateral in the form of cash and securities to offset changes in the fair value of the derivatives, including changes in the fair value due to credit risk of the counterparty. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the balance of collateral held by the Bancorp for derivative assets was $830$444 million and $514$821 million, respectively. The credit component negatively impacting the fair value of derivative assets associated with customer accommodation contracts as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 was $16$6 million and $12$9 million, respectively.

In measuring the fair value of derivative liabilities, the Bancorp considers its own credit risk, taking into consideration collateral maintenance requirements of certain derivative counterparties and the duration of instruments with counterparties that do not require collateral maintenance. When necessary, the Bancorp posts collateral primarily in the form of cash and securities to offset changes in fair value of the derivatives, including changes in fair value due to the Bancorp’s credit risk. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the balance of collateral posted by the Bancorp for derivative liabilities was $574$399 million and $559$504 million, respectively. Certain of the Bancorp’s derivative liabilities contain credit-risk related contingent features that could result in the requirement to post additional collateral upon the occurrence of specified events. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the fair value of the additional collateral that could be required to be posted as a result of the credit-risk related contingent features being triggered was immaterial to the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements. TheStatements.The posting of collateral has been determined to remove the need for further consideration of credit risk. As a result, the Bancorp determined that the impact of the Bancorp’s credit risk to the valuation of its derivative liabilities was immaterial to the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Bancorp holds certain derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are designated as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. Derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, or for which hedge accounting is not established, are held as free-standing derivatives. All customer accommodation derivatives are held as free-standing derivatives.

The fair value of derivative instruments is presented on a gross basis, even when the derivative instruments are subject to master netting arrangements. Derivative instruments with a positive fair value are reported in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets while derivative instruments with a negative fair value are reported in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collateral payables and receivables associated with the derivative instruments are not added to or netted against the fair value amounts. For further information on offsetting derivatives, refer to Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

121132  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following tables reflect the notional amounts and fair values for all derivative instruments included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of:

 

 

 
   Fair Value 
December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)

Notional     

Amount     

 

Derivative

Assets

 

Derivative    

Liabilities    

 

 

 

Qualifying hedging instruments

Fair value hedges:

Interest rate swaps related to long-term debt

$                2,205 399       

 

 

Total fair value hedges

 399       

 

 

Cash flow hedges:

Interest rate swaps related to C&I loans

3,150 36       

 

 

Total cash flow hedges

 36       

 

 

Total derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments

 435       

 

 

Derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging instruments

Free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes:

Interest rate contracts related to MSRs

4,487 181       

Forward contracts related to held for sale mortgage loans

999 -      

Stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

691 415       

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares

1,092 -     49  

 

 

Total free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes

 596     55  

 

 

Free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation:

Interest rate contracts for customers

29,558 272     278  

Interest rate lock commitments

613 12       

Commodity contracts

3,558 348     338 

Foreign exchange contracts

16,745 417     372  

 

 

Total free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation

 1,049     988  

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging instruments

 1,645     1,043  

 

 

Total

$                2,080     1,043  

 

 

 

 
   Fair Value 
December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)

Notional     

Amount    

 

Derivative

Assets

 

Derivative    

Liabilities    

 

 

 

Qualifying hedging instruments

Fair value hedges:

       

Interest rate swaps related to long-term debt

  $                3,205     292      13  

 

 

Total fair value hedges

       292      13  

 

 

Cash flow hedges:

       

Interest rate swaps related to C&I loans

  2,200     40      21  

 

 

Total cash flow hedges

       40      21  

 

 

Total derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments

 332     34  

 

 

Derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging instruments

Free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes:

Interest rate contracts related to MSRs

4,092 141     14  

Forward contracts related to held for sale mortgage loans

1,448 13      

Stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

664 384       

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares

947 -     48  

 

 

Total free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes

 538     63  

 

 

Free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation:

       

Interest rate contracts for customers

  28,112     329      339  

Interest rate lock commitments

  924     12       

Commodity contracts

  3,300     66      65  

Foreign exchange contracts

  19,688     276      252  

 

 

Total free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation

 683     657  

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging instruments

 1,221     720  

 

 

Total

$1,553     754  

 

 

122  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 
       

Fair Value

 
       Notional       Derivative           Derivative     
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)      Amount   Assets   Liabilities 

 

 

Derivatives Designated as Qualifying Hedging Instruments

      

Fair value hedges:

      

Interest rate swaps related to long-term debt

  $        3,455    323    12  

 

 

Total fair value hedges

     323    12  

 

 

Cash flow hedges:

      

Interest rate swaps related to C&I loans

   4,475    22     

 

 

Total cash flow hedges

     22     

 

 

Total derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments

     345    12  

 

 

Derivatives Not Designated as Qualifying Hedging Instruments

      

Free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes:

      

Interest rate contracts related to MSRs

   10,522    165    39  

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

   1,823    20     

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

   1,300    -    91  

Foreign exchange contracts

   111    -     

 

 

Total free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes

     185    133  

 

 

Free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation:

      

Interest rate contracts for customers

   33,431    205    210  

Interest rate lock commitments

   701    13     

Commodity contracts

   2,095    107    106  

Foreign exchange contracts

   11,013    202    204  

 

 

Total free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation

     527    521  

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging instruments

     712    654  

 

 

Total

    $1,057    666  

 

 
      

 

 
       

Fair Value

 
       Notional   Derivative   Derivative 
December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)      Amount   Assets   Liabilities 

 

 

Derivatives Designated as Qualifying Hedging Instruments

      

Fair value hedges:

      

Interest rate swaps related to long-term debt

  $2,705    372     

 

 

Total fair value hedges

     372     

 

 

Cash flow hedges:

      

Interest rate swaps related to C&I loans

   5,475    39     

 

 

Total cash flow hedges

     39     

 

 

Total derivatives designated as qualifying hedging instruments

     411     

 

 

Derivatives Not Designated as Qualifying Hedging Instruments

      

Free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes:

      

Interest rate contracts related to MSRs

   11,657    239     

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

   1,330    3     

Stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

   369    262     

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

   1,292    -    61  

 

 

Total free-standing derivatives - risk management and other business purposes

     504    71  

 

 

Free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation:

      

Interest rate contracts for customers

   29,889    242    249  

Interest rate lock commitments

   721    15     

Commodity contracts

   2,464    294    276  

Foreign exchange contracts

   16,243    386    340  

 

 

Total free-standing derivatives - customer accommodation

     937    865  

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as qualifying hedging instruments

     1,441    936  

 

 

Total

    $1,852    938  

 

 

 

Fair Value Hedges

The Bancorp may enter into interest rate swaps to convert its fixed-rate funding to floating-rate. Decisions to convert fixed-rate funding to floating are made primarily through consideration of the asset/liability mix of the Bancorp, the desired asset/liability sensitivity and interest rate levels. AsFor all interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, certain interest rate swaps met the criteria required to qualify for the shortcut method of accounting. Based on this shortcut method of accounting treatment, no ineffectiveness is assumed. For interest rate swaps that do not meet the shortcut requirements,2016, an assessment of hedge effectiveness using regression analysis was

performed and such swaps were accounted for using the “long-haul”

method. The long-haul method requires a quarterly assessment of hedge effectiveness and measurement of ineffectiveness. For interest rate swaps accounted for as a fair value hedge using the long-haul method, ineffectiveness is the difference between the changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap and changes in fair value of the related hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. The ineffectiveness on interest rate swaps hedging fixed-rate funding is reported within interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

 

133  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table reflects the change in fair value of interest rate contracts, designated as fair value hedges, as well as the change in fair value of the related hedged items attributable to the risk being hedged, included in the Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

         

 
For the year ended December 31 ($ in millions)Caption2014   2013   2012     

Interest rate contracts:

  

Consolidated Statements of

Income Caption

          
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)          2016         2015         2014   

 

Change in fair value of interest rate swaps hedging long-term debt

Interest on long-term debt$120  (279 (104)       Interest on long-term debt  $(59 (29 120  

Change in fair value of hedged long-term debt attributable to the risk being hedged

Interest on long-term debt           (126 276  107       Interest on long-term debt   54  25  (126 

 

 

Cash Flow Hedges

The Bancorp may enter into interest rate swaps to convert floating-rate assets and liabilities to fixed rates or to hedge certain forecasted transactions. The assets or liabilities may be grouped in circumstances where they share the same risk exposure that the Bancorp desires to hedge. The Bancorp may also enter into interest rate caps and floors to limit cash flow variability of floating ratefloating-rate assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2014,2016, all hedges designated as cash flow hedges were assessed for effectiveness using regression analysis. Ineffectiveness is generally measured as the amount by which the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedging instrument exceeds the present value of the cumulative change in the hedged item’s expected cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged. Ineffectiveness is reported within other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The effective portion of the cumulative gains or losses on cash flow hedges are reported within AOCI and are reclassified from AOCI to current period earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the maximum length of time

over which the

Bancorp is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 6036 months.

Reclassified gains and losses on interest rate contracts related to commercial and industrial loans are recorded within interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013, $232015, $10 million and $13$22 million, respectively, of net deferred gains, net of tax, on cash flow hedges were recorded in AOCI in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2014, $332016, $15 million in net deferred gains, net of tax, recorded in AOCI are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months. This amount could differ from amounts actually recognized due to changes in interest rates, hedgede-designations, and the addition of other hedges subsequent to December 31, 2014.2016.

During 2014the years ended 2016 and 2013,2015, there were no gains or losses reclassified from accumulated AOCI into earnings associated with the discontinuance of cash flow hedges because it was probable that the original forecasted transaction would no longer occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within the additional period of time as defined by U.S. GAAP.

 

 

The following table presents the pretaxpre-tax net gains (losses) recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income and the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income relating to derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:

 

For the year ended December 31 ($ in millions)2014   2013   2012          

Amount of pretax net gains (losses) recognized in OCI

$                60  (13 37          

Amount of pretax net gains reclassified from OCI into net income

 44   44   83          

 

 
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)          2016           2015           2014     

 

 

Amount ofpre-tax net gains recognized in OCI

  $30    74    60   

Amount ofpre-tax net gains reclassified from OCI into net income

   48    75    44   

 

 

 

Free-Standing Derivative Instruments – Risk Management and Other Business Purposes

As part of its overall risk management strategy relative to its mortgage banking activity, the Bancorp may enter into various free-standing derivatives (principal-only swaps, interest rate swaptions, interest rate floors, mortgage options, TBAs and interest rate swaps) to economically hedge changes in fair value of its largely fixed-rate MSR portfolio. Principal-only swaps hedge the mortgage-LIBOR spread because these swaps appreciate in value as a result of tightening spreads. Principal-only swaps also provide prepayment protection by increasing in value when prepayment speeds increase, as opposed to MSRs that lose value in a faster prepayment environment. Receive fixed/pay floating interest rate swaps and swaptions increase in value when interest rates do not increase as quickly as expected.

The Bancorp enters into forward contracts and mortgage options to economically hedge the change in fair value of certain residential mortgage loans held for sale due to changes in interest rates. IRLCs issued on residential mortgage loan commitments that will be held for sale are also considered free-standing derivative instruments and the interest rate exposure on these

commitments is economically hedged primarily with forward contracts. Revaluation gains and losses from free-standing derivatives related to mortgage banking activity are recorded as a component of mortgage banking net revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Additionally, as part of the Bancorp’s overall risk management strategy with respect to minimizing significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows caused by interest rate and prepayment volatility, the Bancorp may enter into free-standing derivative instruments (options, swaptions and interest rate swaps). The gains

123  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

and losses on these derivative contracts are recorded within other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

In conjunction with the initial sale of the Bancorp’s 51% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC, the Bancorp received a warrant and issued a put option, which areis accounted for as a free-standing derivatives. The put option expired as a result of the Vantiv, Inc. IPO in March of 2012.derivative. Refer to Note 27 for further discussion of significant inputs and assumptions used in the valuation of the warrant. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Bancorp both sold and exercised part of the warrant. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bancorp exercised the remaining portion of the warrant. For more information, refer to Note 19.

In conjunction with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B sharesShares in 2009, the Bancorp entered into a total return swap in which the Bancorp will make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate of the Class B sharesShares into Class A shares.Shares. This total return swap is accounted for as a free-standing derivative. Refer to Note 27 for further discussion of significant inputs and assumptions used in the valuation of this instrument.

 

 

134  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The net gains (losses) recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income relating to free-standing derivative instruments used for risk management and other business purposes are summarized in the following table:

 

For the year ended December 31 ($ in millions)

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

Caption

  2014    2013    2012    

 
 

   Consolidated Statements of

   Income Caption

          
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)           2016         2015         2014   

 

Interest rate contracts:

      

Forward contracts related to mortgage loans held for sale

 Mortgage banking net revenue$        (18 24  28   

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

 Mortgage banking net revenue  $14  8  (18 

Interest rate contracts related to MSR portfolio

 Mortgage banking net revenue 95  (30 63    Mortgage banking net revenue   24  90  95  

Interest rate swaps related to long-term debt

 Other noninterest income -   -   2   

Foreign exchange contracts:

      

Foreign exchange contracts for risk management purposes

 Other noninterest income 14  5  -     Other noninterest income   2  23  14  

Equity contracts:

      

Stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

 Other noninterest income 31  206  66    Other noninterest income   73 (a)    325 (a)   31  

Put option associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

 Other noninterest income -   -   1   

Swap associated with sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares

 Other noninterest income  (38  (31  (45)   

Swap associated with sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

 Other noninterest income   (56 (37 (38 

 
  (a)

The Bancorp recognized a net gain of$9 on the exercise of the remaining warrant during the fourth quarter of2016 and a net gain of $89 on both the sale and partial exercise of the warrant during the fourth quarter of 2015.

 

Free-Standing Derivative Instruments – Customer Accommodation

The majority of the free-standing derivative instruments the Bancorp enters into are for the benefit of its commercial customers. These derivative contracts are not designated against specific assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets or to forecasted transactions and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments include foreign exchange derivative contracts entered into for the benefit of commercial customers involved in international trade to hedge their exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and commodity contracts to hedge such items as natural gas and various other derivative contracts. The Bancorp may economically hedge significant exposures related to these derivative contracts entered into for the benefit of customers by entering into offsetting contracts with approved, reputable, independent counterparties with substantially matching terms. The Bancorp hedges its interest rate exposure on commercial customer transactions by executing offsetting swap agreements with primary dealers. Revaluation gains and losses on interest rate, foreign exchange, commodity and other commercial customer derivative contracts are recorded as a component of corporate banking revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Bancorp enters into risk participation agreements, under which the Bancorp assumes credit exposure relating to certain underlying interest rate derivative contracts. The Bancorp only enters into these risk participation agreements in instances in which the Bancorp has participated in the loan that the underlying interest rate derivative contract was designed to hedge. The Bancorp will make payments under these agreements if a customer defaults on its obligation to perform under the terms of the underlying interest rate derivative contract. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the total notional amount of the risk participation agreements was $1.1$2.5 billion and $1.2$1.7 billion, respectively, and the fair value was a liability of $2$4 million at December 31, 20142016 and $3 million at December 31, 2013,2015, which is included in interest rate contracts for customers.other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the risk participation agreements had an averagea weighted-average remaining life of 2.63.1 years.

The Bancorp’s maximum exposure in the risk participation agreements is contingent on the fair value of the underlying interest rate derivative contracts in an asset position at the time of default. The Bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with the underlying customers in the risk participation agreements through the same risk grading system currently utilized for establishing loss reserves in its loan and lease portfolio.

 

 

Risk ratings of the notional amount of risk participation agreements under this risk rating system are summarized in the following table:

 

At December 31 ($ in millions)2014          2013           

Pass

$1,052  1,153    

Special mention

 59  38    

Substandard

 2   12    

Total

$                1,113   1,203    

 

 
At December 31 ($ in millions)          2016               2015         

 

 

Pass

  $2,447    1,650   

Special mention

   14    7   

Substandard

   6    7   

 

 

Total

  $2,467    1,664   

 

 

 

124  Fifth Third Bancorp

135  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The net gains (losses) recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income relating to free-standing derivative instruments used for customer accommodation are summarized in the following table:

 

For the year ended December 31

($ in millions)

  

 

  Consolidated Statements of Income  

  Caption  

 2014  2013  2012      

Interest rate contracts:

       

Interest rate contracts for customers (contract revenue)

  Corporate banking revenue   $19   29   30    

Interest rate contracts for customers (credit losses)

  Other noninterest expense    (3  (3  (2)    

Interest rate contracts for customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

  Other noninterest expense    3   7   6    

Interest rate lock commitments

  Mortgage banking net revenue            124   58   417    
Commodity contracts:               

Commodity contracts for customers (contract revenue)

  Corporate banking revenue    6   7   7    

Commodity contracts for customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

  Other noninterest expense    (7  -    2    

Foreign exchange contracts:

       

Foreign exchange contracts - customers (contract revenue)

  Corporate banking revenue    72   69   65    

Foreign exchange contracts - customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

  Other noninterest expense     -    (2  2    

125  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

13. OFFSETTING DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

 
  

   Consolidated Statements of

   Income Caption

             
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)         2016        2015        2014    

 

 

Interest rate contracts:

      

Interest rate contracts for customers (contract revenue)

 Corporate banking revenue  $22   23   19  

Interest rate contracts for customers (credit losses)

 Other noninterest expense   -   (1  (3 

Interest rate contracts for customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

 Other noninterest expense   1   1   3  

Interest rate lock commitments

 Mortgage banking net revenue   114   111   124  

Commodity contracts:

      

Commodity contracts for customers (contract revenue)

 Corporate banking revenue   6   5   6  

Commodity contracts for customers (credit losses)

 Other noninterest expense   (1  (2  -  

Commodity contracts for customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

 Other noninterest expense   1   6   (7 

Foreign exchange contracts:

      

Foreign exchange contracts for customers (contract revenue)

 Corporate banking revenue   62   70   72  

Foreign exchange contracts for customers (credit losses)

 Other noninterest expense   (2  -   -  

Foreign exchange contracts for customers (credit portion of fair value adjustment)

 Other noninterest expense   1   -   -  

 

 

 

Offsetting Derivative Financial Instruments

The Bancorp’s derivative transactions are generally governed by ISDA Master Agreements and similar arrangements, which include provisions governing the setoff of assets and liabilities between the parties. When the Bancorp has more than one outstanding derivative transaction with a single counterparty, the setoff provisions contained within these agreements generally allow thenon-defaulting party the right to reduce its liability to the defaulting

party by amounts eligible for setoff, including the collateral received

as well as eligible offsetting transactions with that counterparty, irrespective of the currency, place of payment or booking office. The Bancorp’s policy is to present its derivative assets and derivative liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a gross basis, even when provisions allowing for setoff are in place.

Collateral amounts included in the tables below consist primarily of cash and highly-rated government-backed securities.

 

 

   

 

Gross Amount

Recognized in the

  

                Gross Amounts Not Offset  in the                

                Consolidated Balance Sheets                 

    
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions) Consolidated Balance Sheets(a)  Derivatives Collateral(b) Net Amount  

Assets

    

Derivatives

    $1,653          (440)   (684)   $529  

Total assets

  1,653          (440)   (684)    529  

Liabilities

    

Derivatives

  1,043          (440)   (293)    310  

Total liabilities

    $1,043          (440)   (293)   $310  
     
             
  

 

Gross Amount

Recognized in the

  

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the

Consolidated Balance Sheets

   
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions) Consolidated Balance Sheets(a)  Derivatives Collateral(b) Net Amount  

Assets

    

Derivatives

    $1,157          (321)   (390)   $446  

Total assets

  1,157          (321)   (390)    446  

Liabilities

    

Derivatives

  753          (321)   (302)    130  

Total liabilities

    $753          (321)   (302)   $130  

The following tables provide a summary of offsetting derivative financial instruments:

 

 
   Gross Amount   Gross Amounts Not Offset in the    
   Recognized in the   Consolidated Balance Sheets    
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  Consolidated Balance Sheets(a)   Derivatives  Collateral(b)      Net Amount   

 

 

Assets

      

Derivatives

  $1,044          (374  (377  293   

 

 

Total assets

   1,044          (374  (377  293   

Liabilities

      

Derivatives

   665          (374  (125  166   

 

 

Total liabilities

  $665          (374  (125  166   

 

 
(a)

Amount does not include IRLCs because these instruments are not subject to master netting or similar arrangements.

(b)

Amount of collateral received as an offset to asset positions or pledged as an offset to liability positions. Collateral values in excess of related derivative amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were excluded from this table.

 

 
   Gross Amount   Gross Amounts Not Offset in the    
   Recognized in the   Consolidated Balance Sheets    
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)  Consolidated Balance Sheets(a)   Derivatives  Collateral(b)      Net Amount   

 

 

Assets

      

Derivatives

  $1,575          (512  (627  436   

 

 

Total assets

   1,575          (512  (627  436   

Liabilities

      

Derivatives

   938          (512  (173  253   

 

 

Total liabilities

  $938          (512  (173  253   

 

 
(a)

Amount does not include the stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC and IRLCs because these instruments are not subject to master netting or similar arrangements.

(b)

Amount of collateral received as an offset to asset positions or pledged as an offset to liability positions. Collateral values in excess of related derivative amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were excluded from this table.

136  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

14. OTHER ASSETS

 

The following table provides the components of other assets included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31:

 

($ in millions)  2014   2013   2016   2015 

Derivative instruments

  $        2,080      1,553 

Accounts receivable anddrafts-in-process

  $2,158            1,653  

Partnership investments

   1,685      1,687            1,689    1,756  

Bank owned life insurance

   1,623      1,587    1,681    1,651  

Accounts receivable and drafts-in-process

   1,452      1,433 

Derivative instruments

   1,057    1,852  

Investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC

   394      423    414    360  

Accrued interest receivable

   312      361 

Accrued interest and fees receivable

   350    329  

Vantiv, Inc. TRA put/call receivable

   165    -  

OREO and other repossessed personal property

   236      306    84    155  

Income tax receivable

   107      12 

Prepaid expenses

   97      94    83    101  

Other

   255       902    163    108  (a)

Total

  $8,241       8,358 

Total other assets

  $7,844    7,965  (a)

(a)

Upon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $34 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1.

 

The Bancorp utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall risk management strategy to reduce certain risks related to interest rate, prepayment and foreign currency volatility. The Bancorp also holds derivatives instruments for the benefit of its commercial customers and for other business purposes. For further information on derivative instruments, refer to Note 12.

CDC, a wholly ownedwholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Bancorp, was created to invest in projects to create affordable housing, revitalize business and residential areas and preserve historic landmarks, which are

included above in partnership investments. In addition, Fifth Third Capital Holdings, a wholly ownedwholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Bancorp, invests as a direct private equity investor and as a limited partner in private equity funds, which are included above as partnership investments. The Bancorp has determined that these partnership investments are VIEs and the Bancorp’s investments represent variable interests. Refer to Note 1011 for further information. Additionally, in response to the issuance of the Volcker Rule, theThe Bancorp recognized $4$9 million and $1 million of OTTI on its investments in private equity funds during

126  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2013. the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Bancorp recognized nodid not recognize OTTI on its investments in private equity funds during the year ended December 31, 2014. Refer to Note 27 for further information.

The Bancorp purchases life insurance policies on the lives of certain directors, officers and employees and is the owner and beneficiary of the policies. Certain BOLI policies have a stable value agreement through either a large, well-rated bank or multi-national insurance carrier that provides limited cash surrender value protection from declines in the value of each policy’s underlying investments. Refer to Note 1 for further information.

The Bancorp utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall risk management strategy to reduce certain risks related to interest rate, prepayment and foreign currency volatility. The Bancorp also holds derivatives instruments for the benefit of its commercial customers and for other business purposes. For further information on derivative instruments, refer to Note 13.

In 2009, the Bancorp sold an approximate 51% interest in its processing business, Vantiv Holding, LLC. As a result of additional share sales completed by the Bancorp, its current ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC is approximately 23%18%. The Bancorp’s ownership in Vantiv Holding, LLC is currently accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Refer to Note 19 for further information.

During 2016 the Bancorp entered into an agreement with Vantiv, Inc. in which Vantiv, Inc. may be obligated to pay a total of approximately $171 million to the Bancorp to terminate and settle certain remaining TRA cash flows, totaling an estimated $394 million, upon the exercise of certain call options by Vantiv, Inc. or certain put options by the Bancorp.

OREO represents property acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings and is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell. Refer to Note 1 for further information.

 

 

137  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

15. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

 

Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short term,short-term and include federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings. Federal funds purchased are excess balances in reserve accounts held at FRBsthe FRB that the Bancorp purchased from

purchased from other member banks on an overnight basis. Other short-term borrowings include securities sold under repurchase agreements, derivative collateral, FHLB advances and other borrowings with original maturities of one year or less.

 

A summary ofThe following table summarizes short-term borrowings and weighted-average rates follows:rates:

 

 

 
2014 2013                   2016                                   2015                 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
($ in millions)Amount Rate Amount Rate         Amount   Rate             Amount   Rate     

 

 

As of December 31:

        

Federal funds purchased

$144  0.08$284  0.03%           $132    0.61%      $151    0.30% 

Other short-term borrowings

 1,556  0.08  1,380  0.09          3,535    0.54        1,507    0.11    

 

 

Average for the years ended December 31:

        

Federal funds purchased

$458  0.09$503  0.12%           $506    0.39%      $920    0.13% 

Other short-term borrowings

           1,873  0.10          3,024  0.18          2,845    0.36        1,721    0.12    

 

 

Maximum month-end balance for the years ended December 31:

        

Federal funds purchased

$286 $925      $739        $200   

Other short-term borrowings

 3,756  8,001    6,374      4,904   

 

 

The following table presents a summary of the Bancorp’s other short-term borrowings as of December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)                  2016                       2015                   

 

 

FHLB advances

  $2,500    -       

Securities sold under repurchase agreements

   661    925       

Derivative collateral

   374    582       

 

 

Total other short-term borrowings

  $3,535    1,507       

 

 

The Bancorp’s securities sold under repurchase agreements are accounted for as secured borrowings and are collateralized by securities included inavailable-for-sale and other securities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These securities are subject to

changes in market value and, therefore, the Bancorp may increase or decrease the level of securities pledged as collateral based upon these movements in market value.

The following table summarizes the Bancorp’s securities sold under repurchase agreements by the type of collateral securing the borrowing and remaining contractual maturity as of December 31:

 

 
   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
($ in millions)            Amount         Remaining Contractual 
Maturity 
             Amount         Remaining Contractual 
Maturity 
 

 

 

Type of Collateral:

        

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  $661    Overnight    $646    Overnight  

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

   -    Overnight     279    Overnight  

 

 

Total securities sold under repurchase agreements

  $661     $925   

 

 

 

127138  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

16. LONG-TERM DEBT

 

The following table is a summary of the Bancorp’s long-term borrowings at December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)Maturity Interest Rate  2014   2013       Maturity     Interest Rate           2016           2015(d)     

 

Parent Company

       

Senior:

       

Fixed-rate notes

 2016 3.625%$1,000  999    2016    3.625%  $-    1,000  

Fixed-rate notes

 2019 2.30% 499  -      2019    2.30%   499    498  

Fixed-rate notes

 2022 3.50% 497  497    2020    2.875%   1,096    1,094  

Fixed-rate notes

   2022    3.50%   497    496  

Subordinated:(a)

       

Floating-rate notes

 2016 0.67% 250  250 

Floating-rate notes(c)

   2016    0.99%   -    250  

Fixed-rate notes

 2017 5.45% 539  558    2017    5.45%   501    520  

Fixed-rate notes

 2018 4.50% 544  555    2018    4.50%   519    532  

Fixed-rate notes

 2024 4.30% 748  748    2024    4.30%   746    746  

Fixed-rate notes

 2038 8.25% 1,317  1,150    2038    8.25%   1,312    1,320  

Subsidiaries

       

Senior:

       

Fixed-rate notes

 2016  1.15% 1,000  1,000    2016    1.15%   -    999  

Fixed-rate notes

 2016  0.90% 400  400    2016    0.90%   -    400  

Floating-rate notes

 2016  0.74% 750  750 

Floating-rate notes

 2016  0.64% 300  300 

Floating-rate notes(c)

   2016    0.87%   -    749  

Floating-rate notes(c)

   2016    0.82%   -    300  

Fixed-rate notes

 2017  1.35% 654  -      2017    1.35%   650    652  

Fixed-rate notes

 2018  1.45% 597  587    2018    2.15%   997    996  

Fixed-rate notes

   2018    1.45%   598    597  

Floating-rate notes(c)

   2018    1.82%   250    250  

Fixed-rate notes

   2019    2.375%   849    848  

Fixed-rate notes

   2019    2.30%   748     

Fixed-rate notes

   2019    1.625%   737     

Floating-rate notes(c)

   2019    1.59%   249     

Fixed-rate notes

 2019  2.375% 850  -      2021    2.25%   1,246     

Fixed-rate notes

 2021  2.875% 846  -      2021    2.875%   845    844  

Subordinated:(a)

       

Fixed-rate bank notes

 2015 4.75% 502  524    2026    3.85%   746     

Junior subordinated:(b)

       

Floating-rate debentures

 2035 1.66% - 1.93% 51  51 

Floating-rate debentures(c)

   2035    2.38% - 2.65%   52    52  

FHLB advances

 2015-2041  0.05% - 6.87% 41  44    2017 - 2041    0.05% - 6.87%   33    37  

Notes associated with consolidated VIE:

Automobile loan securitization:

Notes associated with consolidated VIEs:

       

Automobile loan securitizations:

       

Fixed-rate notes

 2015-2021  0.19% - 1.47% 3,434  1,048    2018 - 2022    0.68% - 1.79%   1,061    2,301  

Floating-rate notes(c)

   2018    1.25%   33    186  

Other

 2015-2039  Varies  148   172    2017 - 2039    Varies   124    143  

 

Total

   $      14,967   9,633      $14,388    15,810 

 
(a)

QualifyIn aggregate,$2.7 billion and $2.4 billion qualifies as Tier II capital for regulatory capital purposes.purposes as ofDecember, 31 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(b)

QualifyUnder the Basel III Final Rule transition provisions,$0 and $13 qualified as Tier I capital for regulatory capital purposes.as ofDecember 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, while the remaining amounts as ofDecember 31, 2016 and 2015 qualify as Tier II capital. Refer to Note 28 for further information.

(c)

These rates reflect the floating rates as ofDecember 31, 2016.

(d)

Upon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $34 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information refer to Note 1.

The Bancorp pays down long-term debt in accordance with contractual terms over maturity periods summarized in the above table. The aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations (based on final maturity dates) as of December 31, 2014,2016 are presented in the following table:

 

 
($ in millions)Parent   Subsidiaries     Total                   Parent            Subsidiaries             Total          

2015

$-   702  702 

2016

 1,250  2,768  4,018 

 

2017

 539  1,942  2,481   $501    655    1,156  

2018

 544  1,407  1,951    519    2,124    2,643  

2019

 499  1,199  1,698    499    2,782    3,281  

2020

   1,096    547    1,643  

2021

   -    2,196    2,196  

Thereafter

 2,562   1,555   4,117    2,555    914    3,469  

 

Total

$                5,394   9,573   14,967   $5,170    9,218    14,388  

 

 

At December 31, 2014,2016, the Bancorp had outstanding principal balances of $14.6$14.1 billion, net discounts of $25$24 million, debt issuance costs of $33 million and additions formark-to-market adjustments on its hedged debt of $407$328 million. At December 31, 2013,2015, the Bancorp

had outstanding principal balances of $9.4$15.5 billion, net discounts of $21$24 million, debt issuance costs of $34 million and additions formark-to-market adjustments on its hedged debt of $278$382 million. The Bancorp was in compliance with all debt covenants at December 31, 2014.2016 and 2015.

PARENT COMPANY LONG-TERM BORROWINGS

139  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Parent Company Long-Term Borrowings

Senior Notes

On January 25, 2011, the Bancorp issued and sold $1.0 billion of senior notes to third party investors. The senior notes bear a fixed-rate of interest of 3.625% per annum. The notes are unsecured,

senior obligations of the Bancorp. Payment of the full principal amounts of the notes is due upon maturity on January 25, 2016. The notes are not subject to redemption at the Bancorp’s option at any time prior to maturity.

On March 7, 2012, the Bancorp issued and sold $500 million of senior notes to third partythird-party investors and entered into a Supplemental Indenture dated March 7, 2012 with the Trustee, which modified the existing Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated April 30, 2008. The Supplemental Indenture and the Indenture define the rights of the senior notes which senior notesand that they are represented by a Global Security dated as of March 7, 2012. The senior notes bear a fixed-rate of interest of 3.50% per annum. The notes are unsecured, senior obligations of the Bancorp. Payment of the full principal amounts of the notes will be due upon maturity on

128  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 15, 2022. TheThese fixed-rate senior notes are not subject to redemption atwill be redeemable by the Bancorp’s option at any time untilBancorp, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to maturity.the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On February 28, 2014, the Bancorp issued and sold $500 million of senior notes to third partythird-party investors. The senior notes bear a fixed-rate of interest of 2.30% per annum. The notes are unsecured, senior obligations of the Bancorp. Payment of the full principal amounts of the notes is due upon maturity on March 1, 2019. TheThese fixed-rate senior notes are not subject to redemption atwill be redeemable by the Bancorp’s option at any time untilBancorp, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to maturity.the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On July 27, 2015, the Bancorp issued and sold $1.1 billion of senior notes to third-party investors. The senior notes bear a fixed-rate of interest of 2.875% per annum. The notes are unsecured, senior obligations of the Bancorp. Payment of the full principal amounts of the notes is due upon maturity on July 27, 2020. These fixed-rate senior notes will be redeemable by the Bancorp, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

Subordinated Debt

The subordinated floating-rate notes due in 2016 pay interest at three-month LIBOR plus 42 bps. The Bancorp has entered into interest rate swaps to convert its subordinated fixed-rate notes due in 2017 and 2018 to floating-rate, which pay interest at three-month LIBOR plus 42 bps and 25 bps, respectively, at December 31, 2014.2016. The rates paid on the swaps hedging the subordinated floating-rate notes due in 2017 and 2018 were 0.69%1.34% and 0.48%1.18%, respectively, at December 31, 2014.2016. Of the $1.0 billion in 8.25% subordinated fixed-rate notes due in 2038, $705 million were subsequently hedged to floating and paid a rate of 3.28%3.98% at December 31, 2014.2016.

On November 20, 2013, the Bancorp issued and sold $750 million of 4.30% unsecured subordinated fixed-rate notes with a maturity date ofdue on January 16, 2024. These fixed-rate notes will be redeemable by the Bancorp, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

SUBSIDIARY LONG-TERM BORROWINGSSubsidiary Long-Term Borrowings

Senior and Subordinated Debt

Medium-term senior notes and subordinated bank notes with maturities ranging from one year to 30 years can be issued by the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary. On February 25, 2013,Under the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary updated and amended its existingsubsidiary’s global bank note program. The amended global bank note program, increased the Bank’s capacity to issue its senior and subordinated unsecured bank notes from $20 billion tois $25 billion. As of December 31, 2014, $19.12016, $17.1 billion was available for future issuance under the global bank note program. For the subordinated fixed-rate bank notes due in 2015, the Bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate debt into floating-rate. At December 31, 2014, the weighted-average rate paid on the swaps was 0.33%.

On February 28, 2013, the Bank issued and sold, under its amended bank notes program, $1.3 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior bank notes. The bank notes consisted of: $600 million of 1.45% unsecured senior fixed-rate bank notes due on February 28, 2018; $400 million of 0.90% senior fixed-rate notes due on February 26, 2016; and $300 million of senior floating-rate notes due on February 26, 2016. Interest on the floating-rate notes is 3-month LIBOR plus 41 bps.2018. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest through the redemption date.

On November 20, 2013, the Bank issued and sold, under its amended bank notes program, $1.8 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior bank notes. The bank notes consisted of $1.0 billion of 1.15% senior fixed-rate notes due on November 18, 2016 and $750 million of senior floating-rate notes due on November 18, 2016. Interest on the floating-rate notes is 3-month LIBOR plus 51 bps. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of

the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On April 25, 2014, the Bank issued and sold, under its amended bank notes program, $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior bank notes. The bank notes consisted of $850 million of 2.375% senior fixed-rate notes due on April 25, 2019 and $650 million of 1.35% senior fixed-rate notes due on June 1, 2017. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On September 5, 2014, the Bank issued and sold, under its amended bank notes program, $850 million of 2.875% unsecured senior fixed-rate bank notes with a maturity date ofdue on October 1, 2021. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On August 20, 2015, the Bank issued and sold, under its bank notes program, $1.3 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior bank notes. The bank notes consisted of $1.0 billion of 2.15% senior fixed-rate notes due on August 20, 2018 and $250 million of senior floating-rate notes due on August 20, 2018. The Bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate notes to floating-rate, which resulted in an effective rate of three-month LIBOR plus 90 bps. Interest on the floating-rate notes is three-month LIBOR plus 91 bps. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On March 15, 2016, the Bank issued and sold, under its bank notes program, $1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured bank notes. The bank notes consisted of $750 million of 2.30% senior fixed-rate notes due on March 15, 2019; and $750 million of 3.85% subordinated fixed-rate notes due on March 15, 2026. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On June 14, 2016, the Bank issued and sold, under its bank notes program, $1.3 billion of 2.25% unsecured senior fixed-rate notes due on June 14, 2021. These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

On September 27, 2016, the Bank issued and sold, under its bank notes program, $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior bank notes due on September 27, 2019. The bank notes consisted of $750 million of 1.625% senior fixed-rate notes and $250 million of senior floating-rate notes at three-month LIBOR plus 59 bps. The Bancorp entered into interest rate swaps to convert the fixed-rate notes to a floating-rate, which resulted in an effective interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 53 bps.

140  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

These bank notes will be redeemable by the Bank, in whole or in part, on or after the date that is 30 days prior to the maturity date at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the redemption date.

Junior Subordinated Debt

The junior subordinated floating-rate bank notes due in 2035 were assumed by the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary as part of the acquisition of First Charter in MayJune 2008. The obligation was issued to First Charter Capital Trust I and II, respectively. The notes of First Charter Capital Trust I and II pay a floating-ratefloating rate at three-month LIBOR plus 169 bps and 142 bps, respectively. The BankBancorp’s nonbank subsidiary holding company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all obligations under the acquired TruPS issued by First Charter Capital Trust I and II.

FHLB Advances

At December 31, 2014,2016, FHLB advances have rates ranging from 0.05% to 6.87%, with interest payable monthly. The advances are secured byBancorp has pledged $17.3 billion of certain residential mortgage loans and securities totaling $20.5 billion. The $41to secure its borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank which is partially utilized to fund $33 million in remainingFHLB advances that are outstanding. The FHLB advances mature as follows: $2 million in 2015, $3 million in 2016, $1 million in 2017, $4 million in 2018, $9 million in 2019, $3 million in 2020, $3 million in 2021 and $22$13 million thereafter.

Notes Associated with Consolidated VIEVIEs

As previously discussed in Note 10,11, the Bancorp was determined to be the primary beneficiary of various VIEs associated with certain automobile loan securitizations completed during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.securitization transactions. As such, $3.4$1.1 billion of long-term debt related to these VIEs was consolidated in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2014.2016. Third-party holders of this debt do not have recourse to the general assets of the Bancorp.

 

 

129  Fifth Third Bancorp

141  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

17. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND GUARANTEES

 

The Bancorp, in the normal course of business, enters into financial instruments and various agreements to meet the financing needs of its customers. The Bancorp also enters into certain transactions and agreements to manage its interest rate and prepayment risks, provide funding, equipment and locations for its operations and invest in its communities. These instruments and agreements involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk, counterparty risk and market risk in

excess of the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The creditworthiness of counterparties for all instruments and agreements is evaluated on acase-by-case basis in accordance with the Bancorp’s credit policies. The Bancorp’s significant commitments, contingent liabilities and guarantees in excess of the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are discussed in further detail below:

 

 

Commitments

The Bancorp has certain commitments to make future payments under contracts. The following table reflects a summary of significant commitments as of December 31:

 

($ in millions)2014      2013               2016      2015       

Commitments to extend credit

$                63,827  62,050            $                67,909                66,884   

Letters of credit

 3,974  4,129             2,583    3,055   

Forward contracts related to held for sale mortgage loans

 999  1,448          

Forward contracts related to residential mortgage loans held for sale

   1,823    1,330   

Noncancelable operating lease obligations

 697  746             576    635   

Capital commitments for private equity investments

 78  90             59    60   

Purchase obligations

 77  84             57    60   

Capital expenditures

   29    30   

Capital lease obligations

 37  19             19    27   

Capital expenditures

 28  33          

 

Commitments to extend credit

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend, typically having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. The Bancorp is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty for the amount of the contract. Fixed-rate commitments are also

subject to market risk

resulting from fluctuations in interest rates and the Bancorp’s exposure is limited to the replacement value of those commitments. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp had a reserve for unfunded commitments, including letters of credit, totaling $135$161 million and $162$138 million, respectively, included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with commitments to extend credit using the same risk rating system utilized within its loan and lease portfolio.

 

 

Risk ratings under this risk rating system are summarized in the following table as of December 31:

 

($ in millions)2014        2013               2016      2015       

Pass

$62,787  61,364        $                66,802                65,645   

Special mention

 660  369         338    647   

Substandard

 380  316         753    592   

Doubtful

 -  1         16    -   

Total

$                63,827  62,050      

Total commitments to extend credit

  $67,909    66,884   

Letters of credit

Standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party and expire as summarized in the following table as of December 31, 2014:2016:

 

($ in millions)  

Less than 1 year(a)

$2,181                        1,387    

1 - 5 years(a)

 1,7501,164    

Over 5 years

 4332    

Total letters of credit

$                    3,9742,583    

(a)

Includes $88$18 and $17$3 issued on behalf of commercial customers to facilitate trade payments in U.S. dollars and foreign currencies which expire less than one1 year and between one and five1 - 5 years, respectively.

 

Standby letters of credit accounted for 97%99% of total letters of credit at both December 31, 20142016 and 20132015, and are considered guarantees in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Approximately 60%62% and 48%65% of the total standby letters of credit were collateralized as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. In the event of nonperformance by the customers, the Bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral, which can include

commercial real estate, physical plant and

property, inventory, receivables, cash and marketable securities. At December 31, 2014 and 2013 theThe reserve related to these standby letters of credit, was $1 million and $2 million, respectively, andwhich is included in the total reserve for unfunded commitments.commitments, was $3 million at December 31, 2016 and immaterial at December 31, 2015. The Bancorp monitors the credit risk associated with letters of credit using the same risk rating system utilized within its loan and lease portfolio.

 

 

130

142  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Risk ratings under this risk rating system are summarized in the following table as of December 31:

 

Risk ratings under this risk rating system are summarized in the following table as of December 31:

Risk ratings under this risk rating system are summarized in the following table as of December 31:

($ in millions)2014      2013               2016          2015         

Pass

$3,483  3,651           $                2,134      2,606   

Special mention

 147  99            98      130   

Substandard

 299  355            290      258   

Doubtful

 45  24            61      61   

Total

$                  3,974  4,129         

Total letters of credit

  $2,583      3,055   

 

At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp had outstanding letters of credit that were supporting certain securities issued as VRDNs. The Bancorp facilitates financing for its commercial customers, which consist of companies and municipalities, by marketing the VRDNs to investors. The VRDNs pay interest to holders at a rate of interest that fluctuates based upon market demand. The VRDNs generally have long-term maturity dates, but can be tendered by the holder for purchase at par value upon proper advance notice. When the VRDNs are tendered, a remarketing agent generally finds another investor to purchase the VRDNs to keep the securities outstanding in the market. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, total VRDNs in which the Bancorp was the remarketing agent or were supported by a Bancorp letter of credit were $1.7$929 million and $1.3 billion, and $2.1 billionrespectively, of which FTS acted as the remarketing agent to issuers on $1.4 billion$784 million and $1.8$1.1 billion, respectively. As remarketing agent, FTS is responsible for finding purchasers for VRDNs that are put by investors. The Bancorp issued letters of credit, as a credit enhancement, to $1.2 billion$609 million and $1.5 billion$921 million of the VRDNs remarketed by FTS, in addition to $247$145 million and $300$187 million in VRDNs remarketed by third parties at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. These letters of credit are included in the total letters of credit balance provided in the previous table. The Bancorp held $6 million and an immaterial amount of these VRDNs in its portfolio and classified them as trading securities at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Forward contracts related to sellresidential mortgage loans held for sale

The Bancorp enters into forward contracts to economically hedge the change in fair value of certain residential mortgage loans held for sale due to changes in interest rates. The outstanding notional amounts of these forward contracts are included in the summary of significant commitments table for all periods presented.

Noncancelable lease obligations and other commitments

The Bancorp’s subsidiaries have entered into a number of noncancelable lease agreements. The minimum rental commitments under noncancelable lease agreements are shown in the summary of significant commitments table. The Bancorp has also entered into a limited number of agreements for work related to banking center construction and to purchase goods or services.

Contingent Liabilities

Private mortgage reinsurance

For certain mortgage loans originated by the Bancorp, borrowers may beare required to obtain PMI provided by third-party insurers. In some instances, these insurers cedeceded a portion of the PMI premiums to the Bancorp, and the Bancorp providesprovided reinsurance coverage within a specified range of the total PMI coverage. The Bancorp’s reinsurance coverage typically rangesranged from 5% to 10% of the total PMI coverage. The Bancorp’s maximum exposure in the event of nonperformance by the underlying borrowers iswas equivalent to the Bancorp’s total outstanding reinsurance coverage, which was $29$27 million at December 31, 2014 and $37 million at December 31, 2013.2015. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp maintained a reserve of $2 million and $10 million, respectively, related to exposures within the reinsurance portfolio which was included in

other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance

Sheets. During 2009,In the second quarter of 2016, the Bancorp suspendedallowed one of its third-party insurers to terminate its reinsurance agreement with the practiceBancorp, resulting in the Bancorp releasing collateral to the insurer in the form of providinginvestment securities and other assets with a carrying value of $6 million, and the insurer assuming the Bancorp’s obligations under the reinsurance agreement, resulting in a decrease to the Bancorp’s reserve liability of PMI for newly originated mortgage loans.$2 million and a decrease in the Bancorp’s maximum exposure of $26 million. In addition, the Bancorp received a payment of $4 million related to the difference between the release of the assets and the reserve liability assumed. During the fourth quarter of 2016, the final policies under the reinsurance agreement were terminated and as of December 31, 2016 the Bancorp no longer had any remaining exposure or reserves related to exposure within the reinsurance portfolio.

Legal claims

There are legal claims pending against the Bancorp and its subsidiaries that have arisen in the normal course of business. Refer to Note 18 for additional information regarding these proceedings.

Guarantees

The Bancorp has performance obligations upon the occurrence of certain events under financial guarantees provided in certain contractual arrangements as discussed in the following sections.

Residential mortgage loans sold with representation and warranty provisions

Conforming residential mortgage loans sold to unrelated third parties are generally sold with representation and warranty provisions. A contractual liability arises only in the event of a breach of these representations and warranties and, in general, only when a loss results from the breach. The Bancorp may be required to repurchase any previously sold loan or indemnify (make whole) the investor or insurer for which the representation or warranty of the Bancorp proves to be inaccurate, incomplete or misleading.

The For more information on how the Bancorp establishes athe residential mortgage repurchase reserve, relatedrefer to various representations and warranties that reflects management’s estimate of losses based on a combination of factors. The Bancorp’s estimation process requires management to make subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain, such as, future demand expectations, economic factors and the specific characteristics of the loans subject to repurchase. Such factors incorporate historical investor audit and repurchase demand rates, appeals success rates, historical loss severity and any additional information obtained from the GSEs regarding future mortgage repurchase and file request criteria. At the time of a loan sale, the Bancorp records a representation and warranty reserve at the estimated fair value of the Bancorp’s guarantee and continually updates the reserve during the life of the loan as losses in excess of the reserve become probable and reasonably estimable. The provision for the estimated fair value of the representation and warranty guarantee arising from the loan sales is recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale, which is included in other noninterest income at the time of sale. Updates to the reserve are recorded in other noninterest expense.Note 1.

During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bancorp settled certain repurchase claims related to residential mortgage loans originated and sold to FHLMC prior to January 1, 2009 for $25 million, after paid claim credits and other adjustments. The settlement removes the Bancorp’s responsibility to repurchase or indemnify FHLMC for representation and warranty violations on any loan sold prior to January 1, 2009 except in limited circumstances.

As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp maintained reserves related to loans sold with representation and warranty provisions totaling $35$13 million and $44$25 million, respectively, included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

        

131  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Bancorp uses the best information available to it inwhen estimating its mortgage representation and warranty reserve,reserve; however, the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise and, accordingly, losses in excess of the amounts accruedreserved as of December 31, 2014,2016, are reasonably possible. The Bancorp currently estimates that it is reasonably possible that it could incur losses related to mortgage representation and warranty provisions in an amount up to approximately $57$21 million in excess of amounts reserved.

143  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

This estimate was derived by modifying the key assumptions previously discussed above to reflect management’s judgment regarding reasonably possible adverse changes to those assumptions. The actual repurchase losses could vary significantly from the

recorded mortgage representation and warranty reserve or this estimate of reasonably possibly losses, depending on the outcome of various factors, including those noted above.previously discussed.

During 2014the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp paid $11$1 million and $64$2 million, respectively, in the form

of make whole payments and repurchased $59$17 million and $89$74 million, respectively, in outstanding principal of loans to satisfy investor demands. Total repurchase demand requests during 2014the years ended December 31, 2016 and 20132015 were $97$22 million and $263$75 million, respectively. Total outstanding repurchase demand inventory was $7$2 million at December 31, 20142016 compared to $46$4 million at December 31, 2013.2015.

 

 

The following table summarizes activity in the reserve for representation and warranty provisions for the years ended:ended December 31:

 

 

($ in millions)2014 2013        2016                   2015   

 

Balance, beginning of period

$44  110        $                25      35    

Net additions to the reserve

 6  7      

Net reductions to the reserve

   (10)    (3)  

Losses charged against the reserve

 (15             (73)         (2)    (7)  

 

Balance, end of period

$          35  44        $13      25    

 

The following tables provide a rollforward of unresolved claims by claimant type for the years ended:ended December 31:

 

 

 
        GSE                 Private Label          

                    GSE                     

 

        Private Label        

 
December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)        Units Dollars          Units Dollars      
2016 ($ in millions)         Units        Dollars          Units   Dollars       

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 264  $41   33  $5        16        $                4         2       $                -         

New demands

 744   95   14   2        309        22         4    -         

Loan paydowns/payoffs

 (44)   (5)   (2)   (1)        (8)      (1)       -    -         

Resolved demands

 (927)               (125)   (44)               (5)        (304)      (23)       (6)  -         

 

 

Balance, end of period

 37  $   $1        13        $                2         -       $                -         

 

 

 

 
        GSE                 Private Label          

                    GSE                     

 

        Private Label        

 
December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)        Units Dollars         Units Dollars      
2015 ($ in millions)         Units        Dollars          Units   Dollars           

 

 

Balance, beginning of period

 294  $48   124  $19        37        $                6         1       $1         

New demands

 1,962   259   237   4        436        33         261    42         

Loan paydowns/payoffs

 (20)   (3)   (6)   (1)        (29)      (2)       -    -         

Resolved demands

 (1,972)               (263)   (322)               (17)        (428)      (33)       (260) (43)       

 

 

Balance, end of period

 264  $41   33  $5        16        $                4         2       $-         

 

 

 

Residential mortgage loans sold with credit recourse

The Bancorp sold certain residential mortgage loans in the secondary market with credit recourse. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Bancorp is required to reimburse the third party. The maximum amount of credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the underlying borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance. In the event of nonperformance, the Bancorp has rights to the underlying collateral value securing the loan. The outstanding balances on these loans sold with credit recourse were $548$374 million and $579$465 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively, and the delinquency rates were 4.0%3.2% at December 31, 20142016 and 4.4%3.0% at December 31, 2013.2015. The Bancorp maintained an estimated credit loss reserve on these loans sold with credit recourse of $11$7 million and $9 million at December 31, 20142016 and $16 million at December 31, 20132015, respectively, recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. To determine the credit loss reserve, the Bancorp used an approach that is consistent with its overall approach in estimating credit losses for various categories of residential mortgage loans held in its loan portfolio.

Margin accounts

FTS, aan indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp, guarantees the collection of all margin account balances held by its brokerage clearing agent for the benefit of its customers. FTS is responsible for payment to its

brokerage clearing agent for any loss, liability, damage, cost or expense incurred as a result of customers failing to comply with margin or margin maintenance calls on all margin accounts. The margin account balance held by the brokerage clearing agent was $13$15 million at December 31, 20142016 and $12$10 million at December 31, 2013.2015. In the event of any

customer default, FTS has rights to the underlying collateral provided. Given the existence of the underlying collateral provided and negligible historical credit losses, the Bancorp does not maintain a loss reserve related to the margin accounts.

Long-term borrowing obligations

The Bancorp had certain fully and unconditionally guaranteed long-term borrowing obligations issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities of $62 million as ofat both December 31, 2014.2016 and 2015.

Visa litigation

The Bancorp, as a member bank of Visa prior to Visa’s reorganization and IPO (the “IPO”) of its Class A common shares (the “Class A Shares”) in 2008, had certain indemnification obligations pursuant to Visa’s certificate of incorporation andby-laws and in accordance with their membership agreements. In accordance with Visa’sby-laws prior to the IPO, the Bancorp could have been required to indemnify Visa for the Bancorp’s

132  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

proportional share of losses based on thepre-IPO membership interests. As part of its reorganization and IPO, the Bancorp’s indemnification obligation was modified to include only certain known or anticipated litigation (the “Covered Litigation”) as of the date of the restructuring. This modification triggered a requirement for the Bancorp to recognize a liability equal to the fair value of the indemnification liability.

In conjunction with the IPO, the Bancorp received 10.1 million of Visa’s Class B common shares (the “Class B Shares”) based on the Bancorp’s membership percentage in Visa prior to the IPO.

144  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Class B Shares are not transferable (other than to another member bank) until the later of the third anniversary of the IPO closing or the date which the Covered Litigation has been resolved; therefore, the Bancorp’s Class B Shares were classified in other assets and accounted for at their carryover basis of $0. Visa deposited $3 billion of the proceeds from the IPO into a litigation escrow account, established for the purpose of funding judgments in, or settlements of, the Covered Litigation. IfSince then, when Visa’s litigation committee determinesdetermined that the escrow account iswas insufficient, then Visa will issueissued additional Class A Shares and depositdeposited the proceeds from the sale of the Class A Shares into the litigation escrow account. When Visa fundsfunded the litigation escrow account, the Class B Shares are subjectwere subjected to dilution through an adjustment in the conversion rate of Class B Shares into Class A Shares.

In 2009, the Bancorp completed the sale of theVisa, Inc. Class B Shares and entered into a total return swap in which the Bancorp will make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate of the Class B Shares into Class A Shares. The swap terminates on the later of the third anniversary of Visa’s IPO or the date on which the Covered Litigation is settled. Refer to Note 27 for additional information on the valuation of the swap. The counterparty to the swap as a result of its ownership of the Class B

Shares will be impacted by dilutive adjustments to the conversion rate of the Class B Shares into Class A Shares caused by any Covered Litigation losses in excess of the litigation escrow account. If actual judgments in, or settlements of, the Covered Litigation significantly exceed current expectations, then additional funding by Visa of the litigation escrow account and the resulting dilution of the Class B Shares could result in a scenario

where the Bancorp’s ultimate exposure associated with the Covered Litigation (the “Visa Litigation Exposure”) exceeds the value of the Class B Shares owned by the swap counterparty (the “Class B Value”). In the event the Bancorp concludes that it is probable that the Visa Litigation Exposure exceeds the Class B Value, the Bancorp would record a litigation reserve liability and a corresponding amount of other noninterest expense for the amount of the excess. Any such litigation reserve liability would be separate and distinct from the fair value derivative liability associated with the total return swap.

As of the date of the Bancorp’s sale of the Visa Class B Shares and through December 31, 2014,2016, the Bancorp has concluded that it is not probable that the Visa Litigation Exposure will exceed the Class B value.Value. Based on this determination, upon the sale of the Class B Shares, the Bancorp reversed its net Visa litigation reserve liability and recognized a free-standing derivative liability associated with the total return swap. The fair value of the swap liability was $49$91 million and $48$61 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, respectively. Refer to Notes 12Note 13 and 18Note 27 for further information.

After the Bancorp’s sale of the Class B Shares, Visa has funded additional amounts into the litigation escrow account which have resulted in further dilution indilutive adjustments to the conversion of Class B Shares into Class A Shares, and along with other terms of the total return swap, required the Bancorp to make cash payments in varying amounts to the swap counterparty as follows:

 

 

($ in millions)      
Period

Visa             

Funding Amount  

 

Bancorp Cash              

Payment Amount          

 

Q2 2010

$                              500 $                                  20          

Q4 2010

 800  35         

Q2 2011

 400  19         

Q1 2012

 1,565  75         

Q3 2012

 150  6         

Q3 2014

 450  18         

 

 
Period ($ in millions)  

Visa

Funding Amount   

   Bancorp Cash
Payment Amount   
     

 

 

Q2 2010

   $                            500          20   

Q4 2010

   800          35   

Q2 2011

   400          19   

Q1 2012

   1,565          75   

Q3 2012

   150          6   

Q3 2014

   450          18   

 

 

 

133145  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

18. LEGAL AND REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS

 

DuringLitigation

Visa/Mastercard Merchant Interchange Litigation

In April 2006, the Bancorp was added as a defendant in a consolidated antitrust class action lawsuit originally filed against Visa®Visa®, MasterCard®MasterCard® and several other major financial institutions in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiffs, merchants operating commercial businesses throughout the U.S. and trade associations, claimed that the interchange fees charged by card-issuing banks were unreasonable and sought injunctive relief and unspecified damages. In addition to being a named defendant, the Bancorp is also subject to a possible indemnification obligation of Visa as discussed in Note 1716 and has also entered into judgment and loss sharing agreements with Visa, MasterCard and certain other named defendants. In October 2012, the parties to the litigation entered into a settlement agreement. TheOn January 14, 2014, the trial court entered a Class Settlement Preliminary Approval Order in November 2012.final order approving the class settlement. A number of merchants filed appeals from that approval. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a hearing on those appeals and on June 30, 2016, reversed the district court’s approval of the class settlement, remanding the case to the district court for further proceedings. In rejecting the settlement, the appellate court found that counsel for plaintiffs was conflicted and thus could not adequately represent the plaintiff-class members of the separate monetary and injunctive relief settlement classes. The appellate court decertified the settlement classes, ordered that the case return to the trial court and directed the trial court to appoint separate counsel for the separate plaintiff classes. Pursuant to the terms of the overturned settlement agreement, the Bancorp previously paid $46 million into a class settlement escrow account. Previously,Because the Bancorp paid an additional $4 millionappellate court ruling remands the case to the district court for further proceedings, the ultimate outcome in another settlement escrow in connection with the settlement of claims from plaintiffs not included in the class action. More than 7,900this matter is uncertain. Approximately 8,000 merchants have requested exclusion from the class settlement. Pursuantsettlement, and therefore, pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, 25% of the funds paid into the class settlement escrow account have beenwere already returned to the control of the defendants through Class Exclusion Takedown Payments. Approximatelydefendants. More than 460 of the merchants who requested exclusion from the class have filed separate federal lawsuits against Visa, MasterCard and certain other defendants alleging similar antitrust violations. These “opt-out”“opt-out” federal lawsuits have beenwere transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Bancorp was not named as a defendant in any of theopt-out federal lawsuits, but may have obligations pursuant to indemnification arrangements and/or the judgment or loss sharing agreements noted above. In addition, one merchant filed a separate state court lawsuit against Visa, MasterCard and certain other defendants, including the Bancorp, alleging similar antitrust violations. On January 14, 2014, the court entered a final order approving the class settlement. A number of merchants have filed appeals from that approval. On July 18, 2014,2015, the court in which all but one of the remainingopt-out federal lawsuits hashave been consolidated denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaints. Several of the opt-out federal lawsuits have been resolved. Refer to Note 17 for further information.

InDudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third Bancorp

On March 29, 2016, the court in two class action lawsuits consolidated as Dudenhoeffer v. Fifth Third Bancorp et al. filed in 2008 two cases were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio againstpreliminarily approved a settlement in which the Bancorp agreed to pay $6 million and make certain changes to the Bancorp’s profit sharing plan. The complaints alleged that the Bancorp and certain officers styledDudenhoeffer vviolated ERISA by continuing to offer Fifth Third Bancorpstock in the Bancorp’s profit sharing plan when it was no longer a prudent investment. On July 11, 2016, the court issued a Final Approval Order and Judgment approving the settlement in all respects and ordering that the settlement agreement be implemented in accordance with its terms.

Klopfenstein v. Fifth Third Bank

On August 3, 2012, William Klopfenstein and Adam McKinney filed a lawsuit against Fifth Third Bank in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Klopfenstein et al. Case No. 1:08-cv-538.v. Fifth Third Bank), alleging that the 120% APR that Fifth Third disclosed on its Early Access program was misleading. Early Access is a deposit-advance program offered to eligible customers with checking accounts. The complaintsplaintiffs sought to represent a nationwide class of customers who used the Early Access program and repaid their cash advances within 30 days. On October 31, 2012, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. In 2013, four similar putative class actions were filed against Fifth Third Bank in federal courts throughout the country (Lori and Danielle Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank, Janet Fyock v. Fifth Third Bank, Jesse McQuillen v. Fifth Third Bank, and Brian Harrison v. Fifth Third Bank). Those four lawsuits were transferred to the Southern District of Ohio and consolidated with the original lawsuit as In re: Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litigation. On behalf of a putative class, the plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary and statutory damages, injunctive relief, punitive damages, attorney’s fees, andpre- and post-judgment interest. On March 30, 2015, the court dismissed all claims alleged violations of ERISA based on allegations similar to those set forth in the previously reported securities class action cases.consolidated lawsuit except a claim under the TILA. The ERISA actions were dismissed byparties are currently engaged inpre-trial proceedings. No trial date has been scheduled.

Nina Investments, LLC v. Fifth Third Bank

On July 5, 2012, Nina Investments, LLC (“Nina”) filed a lawsuit against Fifth Third Bank (Nina Investments, LLC. v. Fifth Third Bank, et al.) in the trial court, but the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversedCook County, Illinois, alleging fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud related to a credit facility established by Fifth Third Bank in 2007 to finance life insurance premiums. Nina invested funds in an entity related to the trial court decision. The Bancorp petitionedborrower under the United States Supreme Courtcredit facility and is claiming over $70 million in damages based on its alleged loss of these funds. Nina alleges that it would have made different investment decisions if Fifth Third had disclosed fraud committed by the borrower with the alleged knowledge of Fifth Third employees. Nina filed this lawsuit in response to review and reverse the Sixth Circuit decision and sought a stay of proceedingslawsuit filed by Fifth Third Bank in the trialsame court pending appeal. On December 13, 2013, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and agreed to hear the appeal. Oral arguments were held on April 2, 2014 and on June 25, 201411, 2010 against Nina and other defendants (Fifth Third Bank v. Concord Capital Management, LLC, et al.) alleging fraud and breach of contract. In 2015, the Supreme Court unanimously vacatedcourt dismissed Fifth Third’s contract and fraud claims against certain defendants. Fifth Third currently has claims pending against other defendants, including a claim for fraudulent conveyance against Nina. On October 20, 2016, the Sixth Circuit decisioncourt denied Fifth Third’s motion to assert a new claim against Nina and remanded the caseother investors for further proceedings consistent with the standards articulated in its decision. The Supreme Court issued its mandate remanding the case backfraudulent inducement of a guarantee related to the Sixth Circuit Courtcredit facility and to reassert claims for breach of Appeals but no further proceedings have occurred.

In November 2014, a shareholderguarantee against certain of the Bancorpinvestors who also acted as guarantors. The trial has been scheduled in these consolidated actions for April 24, 2017.

Helton v. Fifth Third Bank

On August 31, 2015, trust beneficiaries filed a shareholder derivative suitan action against Fifth Third Bank, as trustee, in the Probate Court of Common Pleas for Hamilton County, Ohio against current and former members(Helen Clarke Helton, et al. v. Fifth Third Bank). The plaintiffs allege breach of the Bancorp’s Board of Directors, the Bancorp’s former Chief Financial Officer and current Executive Vice President, Daniel T. Poston, the

Bancorp’s Chief Executive Officer, Kevin T. Kabat, and, nominally, the Bancorp. The suit allegesduty to diversify, breach of the duty of impartiality, breach of trust/fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment, based on Fifth Third’s alleged failure to diversify assets held in connectiontwo trusts held for the plaintiffs’ benefit. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages, attorney’s fees, removal of Fifth Third as trustee, and injunctive relief. On January 5, 2016, the Court denied Fifth Third’s motion to dismiss. The parties are currently engaged inpre-trial proceedings. Trial is currently scheduled for September 18, 2017.

146  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank

On February 2, 2012, Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. (“Upsher-Smith”) filed suit against Fifth Third Bank in the Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank), alleging that Fifth Third improperly implemented foreign exchange (“FX”) transactions requested by plaintiff’s authorized employee who allegedly was the victim of fraud by a third party. Plaintiff asserts claims for breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and under Article4A-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, with losses allegedly totalling almost $40 million. On March 3, 2016, Fifth Third removed the Bancorp’s alleged violations of federal and state securities laws, among other charges, in relationcase to its administrative settlement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission announced on December 4, 2013 to resolveDistrict Court for the previously reported investigationDistrict of the Bancorp’s historical accounting and reporting with respect to certain commercial loans that were sold or reclassified as held for sale by the Bancorp in the fourth quarter of 2008. The suit seeks, among other things, unspecified monetary damages, disgorgement of profits, certain corporate governance and personnel actions and compliance and disclosure changes. On January 16, 2015Minnesota. Fifth Third filed a motion to dismisstransfer venue to the complaintUnited States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio on April 7, 2016, which was denied on December 29, 2016. Discovery was stayed pending the Court’s ruling on the motion to transfer. No trial date has been scheduled.

The Champions Home Owners Association, Inc. v. Jeffrey D. Quammen, et al.

On September 12, 2013 Fifth Third Bank was named as a defendant in a cross-complaint filed by Royce Pulliam, P&P Real Estate, LLC and Global Fitness Holdings, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) in the Jessamine Circuit Court in Jessamine County, Kentucky. The Plaintiffs allege that Fifth Third Bank breached a contract to provide commercial funding for Plaintiffs’ national fitness franchise. The Plaintiffs claim to have sustained over $50 million in damages from the alleged contract breach. Fifth Third Bank denies that any breach of contract occurred, and further asserts that Plaintiffs executed multiple releases waiving the claims at issue in the litigation. Fifth Third Bank has asserted a $1.5 million claim against Plaintiff Royce Pulliam for breach of guaranty. On February 3, 2017 the Jessamine Circuit Court ruled in favor of Fifth Third Bank granting summary judgment on behalfFifth Third’s claim for breach of all defendants.guaranty. The impactCourt denied Fifth Third Bank’s motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the final disposition of this lawsuit cannot be assessed at this time.Plaintiffs’ claims. The case is set for a bench trial beginning February 27, 2017.

Other Litigation

The Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not parties to any other material litigation. However, there are other litigation matters that arise in the normal course of business. While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate resolution or range of financial liability with respect to these contingent matters, management believes anythat the resulting liability, if any, from these other actions would not have a material effect upon the Bancorp’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Governmental Investigations and Proceedings

The Bancorp and/or its affiliates are involved in information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by various governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, including but not limited to the CFPB, FINRA, etc., as well as self-regulatory bodies regarding their respective businesses. Additional matters will likely arise from time to time. Any of these matters may result in material adverse consequences to the Bancorp, its affiliates and/or their respective directors, officers and other personnel, including adverse judgments, findings, settlements, fines, penalties, orders, injunctions or other actions, amendments and/or restatements of the Bancorp’s SEC

filings and/or financial statements, as applicable, and/or determinations of material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures. Investigations by regulatory authorities may from time to time result in civil or criminal referrals to law enforcement authorities such as the Departmentenforcement.

Reasonably Possible Losses in Excess of Justice or a United States Attorney. Among other matters, the Bancorp has been cooperating with the Department of Justice, the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Federal Housing Finance Authority in civil investigations regarding compliance with requirements relating to certain Federal Housing Agency-insured loans and certain loans sold to government sponsored entities originated by affiliates of the Bancorp. The investigations could lead to liability under the Federal False Claims Act and/or the Federal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, which allow up to treble and other special damages substantially in excess of actual losses. Additionally, the Bancorp is also cooperating with an investigation by the Department of Justice to determine whether the Bank engaged in any discriminatory practices in connection with the Bank’s indirect automobile loan portfolio. Any claim resulting from this investigation could include direct and indirect damages and civil money penalties.Accruals

The Bancorp is partyand its subsidiaries are parties to numerous claims and lawsuits as well as threatened or potential actions or claims concerning matters arising from the conduct of its business activities. The outcome of claims or litigation and the timing of ultimate resolution are inherently difficult to predict. The following factors, among others, contribute to this lack of predictability: plaintiff claims often include significant legal uncertainties, damages alleged by plaintiffs are often unspecified or overstated, discovery may not have started or may not be complete and material facts may be disputed or

134  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

unsubstantiated. As a result of these factors, the Bancorp is not always able to provide an estimate of the range of reasonably possible outcomes for each claim. A reserveAn accrual for a potential litigation loss is established when information related to the loss contingency indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Any such reserveaccrual is adjusted from time to time thereafter as appropriate to reflect changes in circumstances. The Bancorp also determines, when possible (due to the uncertainties described above), estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of reasonably possible losses, in excess of amounts reserved.accrued. Under U.S. GAAP, an event is “reasonably possible” if “the chance of the future event or events occurring is more than remote but less than likely” and an event is “remote” if “the chance of the future event or events occurring is slight.” Thus, references to the upper end of the range of reasonably possible loss for cases in which the Bancorp is able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss mean the upper end of the range of loss for cases for which the Bancorp believes the risk of loss is more than slight. For matters where the Bancorp is able to estimate such possible losses or ranges of possible losses, the Bancorp currently estimates that it is reasonably possible that it could incur losses related to legal and regulatory proceedings including the matters discussed above in an aggregate amount up to approximately $105$43 million in excess of amounts reserved,accrued, with it also being reasonably possible that no losses will be incurred in these matters. The estimates included in this amount are based on the Bancorp’s analysis of currently available information, and as new information is obtained the Bancorp may change its estimates.

For these matters and others where an unfavorable outcome is reasonably possible but not probable, there may be a range of possible losses in excess of the established reserveaccrual that cannot be estimated. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and established reserves,accruals, the Bancorp believes that the eventual outcome of the actions against the Bancorp and/or its subsidiaries, including the matters described above, will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the Bancorp’s consolidated financial position. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of those matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Bancorp’s results of operations for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the size of the loss or liability imposed and the operating results for the applicable period.

 

135147  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

19. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Bancorp maintains written policies and procedures covering related party transactions towith principal shareholders, directors and executives of the Bancorp. These procedures cover transactions such as employee-stock purchase loans, personal lines of credit, residential secured loans, overdrafts, letters of credit and increases in indebtedness. Such transactions are subject to the Bancorp’s normal underwriting and approval procedures. Prior to

approving a loan to

a related party, Compliance Risk Management must review and determine whether the transaction requires approval from or a post notification to the Bancorp’s Board of Directors. At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, certain directors, executive officers, principal holders of Bancorp common stock associates of such persons, and affiliated companies of such personstheir related interests were indebted, including undrawn commitments to lend, to the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary.

 

 

The following table summarizes the Bancorp’s lending activities with its principal shareholders, directors, executives and executivestheir related interests at December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)2014 2013   2016           2015     

 

Commitments to lend, net of participations:

    

Directors and their affiliated companies

$525  586   $            618      831       

Executive officers

 3  2    4      5       

 

Total

$            528  588   $622      836       

 

Outstanding balance on loans, net of participations and undrawn commitments

$63  86   $54      97       

 

 

The commitments to lend are in the form of loans and guarantees for various business and personal interests. This indebtedness was incurred in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated parties. This indebtedness does not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other features unfavorable to the Bancorp.

Vantiv Holding, LLC

On June 30, 2009, the Bancorp completed the sale of a majority interest in its processing business, Vantiv Holding, LLC. Advent

International acquired an approximate 51% interest in

Vantiv Holding, LLC for cash and a warrant. The Bancorp retained the remaining approximate 49% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC.

During the first quarter of 2012, Vantiv, Inc. priced an IPO of its shares and contributed the net proceeds to Vantiv Holding, LLC for additional ownership interests. As a result of this offering, the Bancorp’s ownership of Vantiv Holding, LLC was reduced to approximately 39%. The impact of the capital contributions to Vantiv Holding, LLC and the resulting dilution in the Bancorp’s interest resulted in a gain of $115 million recognized by the Bancorp in the first quarter of 2012.

 

 

The following table provides a summary of the sales transactions that impacted the Bancorp’s ownership interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC after the initial IPO:

 

($ in millions)          

Ownership      

Percentage Sold      

 Gain on Sale 

      Remaining Ownership  

        Percentage(a)  

PeriodOwnership
Percentage Sold
 Gain on Sale Remaining Ownership  
Percentage(a)  
 

Q4 2012

 6 %  $                  157      33 %       6   %      $                157     33   %  

Q2 2013

 5      242      28          5             242     28         

Q3 2013

 3      85      25          3             85     25         

Q2 2014

 3      125      23          3             125     23         

Q4 2015

 5             331     18         

(a)

The Bancorp’s remaining investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC of$394414 as ofDecember 31, 20142016 was accounted for as an equity method investment in the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

The Bancorp agreed during the fourth quarter of 2015 to cancel rights to purchase approximately 4.8 million Class C Units in Vantiv Holding, LLC, the wholly-owned principal operating subsidiary of Vantiv, Inc., underlying the warrant in exchange for a cash payment of $200 million. Subsequent to this cancellation, the Bancorp exercised its right to purchase approximately 7.8 million Class C Units underlying the warrant at the $15.98 strike price. This exercise was settled on a net basis for approximately 5.4 million Class C Units, which were then exchanged for approximately 5.4 million shares of Vantiv, Inc. Class A Common Stock that were sold in the secondary offering. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $89 million in other noninterest income on the 62% of the warrant that was settled or net exercised. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2015, the Bancorp exchanged 8 million Class B Units of Vantiv Holding, LLC for 8 million Class A Shares in Vantiv, Inc., which were also sold in the secondary offering and on which the Bancorp recognized a gain of $331 million in other noninterest income.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Bancorp exercised its right to purchase approximately 7.8 million Class C Units

underlying the warrant at the $15.98 strike price. This exercise was settled on a net basis for approximately 5.7 million Class C Units, which were then exchanged for approximately 5.7 million shares of Vantiv, Inc. Class A Common Stock of which 4.8 million shares were sold in a secondary offering and 0.9 million shares were repurchased by Vantiv, Inc. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $9 million in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income in 2016 on the exercise of the remaining warrant in Vantiv Holding, LLC.

As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Bancorp continued to hold approximately 4335 million Class B unitsUnits of Vantiv Holding, LLC and a warrant to purchase approximately 20.4 million Class C non-voting units of Vantiv Holding, LLC, both of which may be exchanged for Class A Common Stock of Vantiv, Inc. on a one for oneone-for-one basis or at Vantiv, Inc.’s option for cash.cash which represents approximately 17.9% ownership of Vantiv, Holding, LLC. In addition, the Bancorp holds approximately 4335 million Class B common sharesCommon Shares of Vantiv, Inc. The Class B common sharesCommon Shares give the Bancorp voting rights, but no economic interest in Vantiv, Inc. The voting rights attributable to the Class B common shares are limited to 18.5% of the voting power in Vantiv, Inc. at

148  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At any time, other than in connection with a stockholder vote with respect to a change in control in Vantiv, Inc., the voting rights attributable to the Class B Common Shares are limited to the lesser of 18.5% or the Bancorp’s ownership percentage of Vantiv Holding, LLC, currently 17.9%. These securities are subject to certain terms and restrictions.

The Bancorp recognized $48$66 million, $77$63 million and $61$48 million, respectively, in other noninterest income as part of its equity method investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 and received cash distributions totaling $9 million, $11 million and $23 million $40during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Bancorp’s remaining investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC continues to be accounted for under the equity method of accounting as of December 31, 2016.

During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Bancorp entered into an agreement with Vantiv, Inc. under which a portion of its TRA with Vantiv, Inc. was terminated and settled in full for a cash payment of approximately $49 million from Vantiv, Inc. Under the agreement, the Bancorp sold certain TRA cash flows it expected to receive from 2017 to 2030, totaling an estimated $140 million. Approximately half of the sold TRA cash flows related to 2025 and later. This sale did not impact the TRA payment recognized during the fourth quarter of 2015.

During the third quarter of 2016, the Bancorp entered into an agreement with Vantiv, Inc. under which a portion of its TRA with

Vantiv, Inc. was terminated and settled in full for consideration of a cash payment in the amount of $116 million from Vantiv, Inc. Under the agreement, the Bancorp terminated and settled certain TRA cash flows it expected to receive in the years 2019 to 2035, totaling an estimated $331 million. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $116 million in other noninterest income from this settlement. Additionally, the agreement provides that Vantiv, Inc. may be obligated to pay up to a total of approximately $171 million to the Bancorp to terminate and settle certain remaining TRA cash flows, totaling an estimated $394 million, upon the exercise of certain call options by Vantiv, Inc. or certain put options by the Bancorp. If the associated call options or put options are exercised, 10% of the obligations would be settled with respect to each quarter in 2017 and 15% of the obligations would be settled with respect to each quarter in 2018. The Bancorp recognized a gain of $164 million in other noninterest income associated with these options. This agreement did not impact the TRA payments recognized in the fourth quarter of 2016 and is not expected to impact the TRA payment expected in the fourth quarter of 2017.

In addition to the impact of the TRA terminations discussed above, the Bancorp recognized $33 million, $31 million and $30$23 million in noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income associated with the TRA during 2014, 2013the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively.

The following table provides the estimated cash flows to be received as of December 31, 2016 associated with the TRA for the years ending December 31, 2017 and thereafter:

 

 
($ in millions)  Cash Flows to be Received
From Put/Call Option
Exercises (Fixed Amounts)(b) 
   Estimated Cash Flows to
be Received not Subject to
Put/Call Option(a)
    

 

 

2017

  $63    33  

2018

   108    42  

2019

   -    8  

2020

   -    8  

2021

   -    8  

2022

   -    8  

2023

   -    9  

2024

   -    9  

2025

   -    9  

2026

   -    10  

Thereafter

   -    102  

 

 

Total

  $171    246  

 

 
(a)

The 2017 cash flow of $33 has been agreed upon with Vantiv, Inc. for settlement in January 2017 and was recognized as a gain in noninterest income during the fourth quarter of 2016. The remaining estimated cash flows in this column (which include TRA benefits associated with the net exercise of the warrant and the subsequent exchange of Vantiv Holding, LLC units in the fourth quarter of 2016) will be recognized in future periods when the related uncertainties are resolved.

(b)

As part of the agreement the Bancorp entered into with Vantiv, Inc. on July 27, 2016, Vantiv, Inc. may be obligated to pay a total of approximately $171 to the Bancorp to terminate certain remaining TRA cash flows, totaling an estimated $394, upon the exercise of certain call options by Vantiv, Inc. or certain put options by the Bancorp.

The Bancorp and Vantiv Holding, LLC have various agreements in place covering services relating to the operations of Vantiv Holding, LLC. The services provided by the Bancorp to Vantiv Holding, LLC were initially required to support Vantiv Holding, LLC as a standalone entity during the deconversion period. The majority of services previously provided by the Bancorp to support Vantiv Holding, Inc.LLC as a standalone entity are no longer necessary and are now limited to certain general business resources. Vantiv Holding, LLC paid the Bancorp $1 million for these services for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012, respectively.2014. Other services provided to Vantiv Holding, LLC by the Bancorp, have continued beyond the deconversion period, include interchange clearing, settlement and sponsorship. Vantiv Holding, LLC paid the Bancorp $58 million, $47 million and $44 million for these services for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $34 million for the years ended December 31, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. In addition to the previously mentioned services, the Bancorp previously entered into an

agreement under which Vantiv Holding, LLC will provide processing services to the Bancorp. The total amount of fees relating to the processing services provided to the Bancorp by Vantiv Holding, LLC totaled $83$76 million, $88

136  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

$89 million and $83 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, 2013respectively. These fees are reported as a component of card and 2012, respectively.processing expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

As part of the initial sale, Vantiv Holding, LLC assumed loans totaling $1.25 billion owed to the Bancorp, which were refinanced in 2010 into a larger syndicated loan structure that included the Bancorp. The outstanding balancecarrying value of loans to Vantiv Holding, LLC was $204$210 million and $348$191 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013,

2015, respectively. Interest income relating to the loans was $5$4 million, $7$4 million and $11$5 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 and is included in interest and fees on loans and leases in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Vantiv Holding, LLC’s unused line of credit was $50$59 million and $46 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

149  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SLK Global

As of December 31, 2016, the Bancorp owns 100% of Fifth Third Mauritius Holdings Limited, which owns 49% of SLK Global, and accounts for this investment under the equity method of accounting. The Bancorp’s investment in SLK Global was $6 million at both December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Bancorp recognized $3 million in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income as part of its equity method investment in SLK Global for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 and 2013. Vantiv Holding, LLC did not draw upon its linereceived an immaterial amount of creditcash distributions during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The Bancorp paid SLK Global $20 million, $17 million and $13 million for their process and software services during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, or 2013.respectively.

CDC Investments

The Bancorp’s subsidiary, CDC, has equity investments in entities in which the Bancorp had $76 million and $5 million of loans outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and unfunded commitment balances of $18 million and $88 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Bancorp held $28 million and $23 million of deposits for these entities at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For further information on CDC investments, refer to Note 11.

 

150  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

20. INCOME TAXES

 

The Bancorp and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. The following is a summary of applicable income taxes included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)2014 2013 2012   2016           2015           2014 

 

Current income tax expense:

      

U.S. Federal income taxes

$424  494  327   $            598      662      424   

State and local income taxes

 34  23  38    55      55      34   

Foreign income taxes

 8  2  -    -      13      8   

Total current tax expense

 466  519  365 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit):

 

Total current income tax expense

   653      730      466   

 

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense:

      

U.S. Federal income taxes

 71  232  252    (133)    (78)    71   

State and local income taxes

 9  23  19    (14)    6      9   

Foreign income taxes

 (1 (2 -    (1)    1      (1) 

Total deferred income tax expense

 79  253  271 

 

Total deferred income tax (benefit) expense

   (148)    (71)    79   

 

Applicable income tax expense

$          545  772  636   $505      659      545   

 

The following is a reconciliation between the statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate and the Bancorp’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31:

 

 
  2016         2015           2014 
2014 2013 2012 

 

Statutory tax rate

 35.0  35.0  35.0    35.0    %   35.0      35.0   

Increase (decrease) resulting from:

     

State taxes, net of federal benefit

 1.4   1.2  1.7    1.3     1.7      1.4   

Tax-exempt income

 (1.4)   (1.1 (2.1   (2.7)  (1.7)    (1.4) 

Credits

 (8.1)   (6.0 (6.7

Unrealized stock-based compensation benefits

   0.3  0.8 

Low-income housing tax credits

   (7.9)  (6.6)    (7.0) 

Other tax credits

   (0.9)  (0.9)    (1.1) 

Other, net

   0.3  0.1    (0.4)   0.3      -   

 

Effective tax rate

 26.9  29.7  28.8    24.4    %   27.8      26.9   

 

 

Other tax credits in the rate reconciliation table include New Markets, Rehabilitation Investment and Qualified Zone Academy Bond tax credits.Tax-exempt income in the rate reconciliation table includes interest on municipal bonds, interest ontax-exempt

lending, income/chargesincome on life insurance policies held by the Bancorp, and

certain gains on sales of leases that are exempt from federal taxation.

 

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of the Bancorp’s unrecognized tax benefits:

 

 
($ in millions)2014 2013 2012   2016           2015           2014 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1

$7  18  14   $            13      11      7   

Gross increases for tax positions taken during prior period

 2  1  6    9      1      2   

Gross decreases for tax positions taken during prior period

 -    (7 (3   -      -      -   

Gross increases for tax positions taken during current period

 2  1  2    2      2      2   

Settlements with taxing authorities

 -    (5 -      -      -      -   

Lapse of applicable statute of limitations

 -    (1 (1   -      (1)    -   

 

Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31(a)

$            11  7  18   $24      13      11   

 
(a)

Amounts represent unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the annual effective tax rate.

 

The Bancorp’s unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 2013 and 2012primarily relate to state income tax exposures from taking tax positions where the Bancorp believes it is likely that, upon examination, a state will take a position contrary to the position taken by the Bancorp.

While it is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits with respect to certain of the Bancorp’s uncertain tax positions could increase or decrease during the next 12twelve months, the Bancorp believes it is unlikely that its unrecognized tax benefits will change by a material amount during the next 12twelve months.

 

 

137151  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Deferred income taxes are comprised of the following items at December 31:

 

 
($ in millions)2014 2013   2016           2015  

 

Deferred tax assets:

    

Allowance for loan and lease losses

$463  554   $            439      445    

Deferred compensation

 113  109    122      118    

Reserves

 96  101    57      61    

Reserve for unfunded commitments

 47  57    56      48    

State net operating losses

 18  22 

State net operating loss carryforwards

   9      10    

Other

 189  180    223      194    

 

Total deferred tax assets

$            926  1,023   $            906      876    

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

Lease financing

$896  865   $            940      935    

Investments in joint ventures and partnership interests

 329  381    219      248    

MSRs

 237  254 

MSRs and related economic hedges

   202      245    

State deferred taxes

   64      79    

Bank premises and equipment

   61      53    

Other comprehensive income

 231  44    34      106    

Qualifying hedges and free-standing derivatives

 105  97 

Bank premises and equipment

 103  114 

State deferred taxes

 81  76 

Other

 148  130    173      218    

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

$2,130  1,961   $         1,693      1,884    

 

Total net deferred tax liability

$(1,204 (938  $(787)    (1,008)  

 

 

At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp had recorded deferred tax assets of $18$9 million and $22$10 million, respectively, related to state net operating loss carryforwards. The deferred tax assets relating to state net operating losses (primarily resulting from leasing operations) are presented net of specific valuation allowances of $19$25 million and $22 million at December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015, respectively. If these carryforwards are not utilized, they will expire in varying amounts through 2034.2035. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Bancorp recorded a deferred tax asset of $3 million and $5 million, respectively related to a foreign tax credit carryforward. If not utilized, the majority of the deferred tax asset relating to the foreign tax credit carryforward will expire in 2025.

The Bancorp has determined that a valuation allowance is not needed against the remaining deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20142016 or 2013.2015. The Bancorp considered all of the positive and negative evidence available to determine whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will ultimately be realized and, based upon that evidence, the Bancorp believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets recorded at December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 will ultimately be realized. The Bancorp reached this conclusion as the Bancorp has taxable income in the carryback period and it is expected that the Bancorp’s remaining deferred tax assets will be realized through the reversal of its existing taxable temporary differences and its projected future taxable income.

The IRS is currently examining the Bancorp’s 20102012 and 20112013 federal income tax returns. The statute of limitations for the Bancorp’s federal income tax returns remains open for tax years

2010-2014. 2012-2016. On occasion, as various state and local taxing jurisdictions examine the returns of the Bancorp and its subsidiaries, the Bancorp may agree to extend the statute of limitations for a shortreasonable period of time. Otherwise, with the exception of a few states with insignificant uncertain tax positions, the statutes of limitations for state income tax returns remain open only for tax years in accordance with each state’s statutes.

Any interest and penalties incurred in connection with income taxes are recorded as a component of income tax expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements. During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012,2016, the Bancorp recognized $1 million of interest

expense in connection with income taxes and an immaterial amount of interest expense in connection with income taxes.expense/benefit for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp had accrued interest liabilities, net of the related tax benefits, of $1 million. No material liabilities were recorded for penalties related to income taxes.

Retained earnings at December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 included $157 million in allocations of earnings for bad debt deductions of former thrift subsidiaries for which no income tax has been provided. Under current tax law, if certain of the Bancorp’s subsidiaries use these bad debt reserves for purposes other than to absorb bad debt losses, they will be subject to federal income tax at the current corporate tax rate.

During 2016, the Bancorp adopted ASU2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, effective as of January 1, 2016. Consistent with existing U.S. GAAP and ASU2016-09, the Bancorp establishes a deferred tax asset and recognizes a corresponding deferred tax benefit for stock-based awards granted to its employees and directors based on enacted tax rates and the expense recorded for financial reporting purposes. The actual tax deduction for these stock-based awards is determined when the stock-based awards are settled or expired and the tax deductions will typically be greater than or less than the expense previously recognized for financial reporting.

Among other requirements, ASU2016-09 requires that the tax consequences for the difference between the expense recognized for financial reporting and the Bancorp’s actual tax deduction for the stock-based awards be recognized through income tax expense in the interim periods in which they occur. Prior to the adoption of ASU2016-09, the tax consequences for the difference between the expense recognized for financial reporting and the actual tax deduction for stock-based awards was recognized either through additionalpaid-in-capital when the Bancorp accumulated “excess tax benefits” from stock based awards or through income tax expense when the Bancorp depleted its accumulated “excess tax benefits” from stock-based awards.

 

152  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

21. RETIREMENT AND BENEFIT PLANS

 

The Bancorp’s qualified defined benefit plan’s benefits were frozen in 1998, except for grandfathered employees. The Bancorp’s other retirement plans consist of nonqualified, supplemental retirementnon-qualified, defined benefit plans, which are frozen and funded on an as needed basis. A majority of these

plans were obtained in acquisitions from prior years.years and are included with the qualified defined benefit plan in the following tables (“the Plan”). The Bancorp recognizes the

overfunded and underfunded status of its pension plansthe Plan as an asset and liability, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Plan had an underfunded projected benefit obligation at both December 31, 2016 and 2015. The underfunded amounts recognized in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $34 million and $54 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

 

The overfunded and underfunded amounts recognized in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, onfollowing table summarizes the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows as of December 31:

($ in millions)2014 2013 

Prepaid benefit cost

$                             -                          6 

Accrued benefit liability

 (52 (27

Net underfunded status

$(52 (21

The following tables summarize the defined benefit retirement plansPlan as of and for the years ended December 31:

 

138  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Plans with an Overfunded Status(a)    

 
($ in millions)2014 2013   2016       2015             

 

Fair value of plan assets at January 1

$                         -  ��                    185   $                        166      195   

Actual return on assets

 -  30    11      (6) 

Contributions

 -  5    20      4   

Settlement

 -  (13   (15)    (17) 

Benefits paid

 -  (7   (10)    (10) 

 

Fair value of plan assets at December 31

$-  200   $172      166   

 

Projected benefit obligation at January 1

$-  224   $220      247   

Service cost

 -  - 

Interest cost

 -  10    9      9   

Settlement

 -  (13   (15)    (17) 

Actuarial gain

 -  (20

Actuarial (gain) loss

   2      (9) 

Benefits paid

 -  (7   (10)    (10) 

 

Projected benefit obligation at December 31

$-  194   $206      220   

Overfunded projected benefit obligation at December 31

$-  6 

 

Underfunded projected benefit obligation at December 31

  $(34)    (54) 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation at December 31(a)

  $206      220   

 
(a)

The Bancorp’s definedSince the Plan’s benefits are frozen, the rate of compensation increase is no longer an assumption used to calculate the accumulated benefit plan had an Overfunded statusobligation. Therefore, the accumulated benefit obligation was the same as the projected benefit obligation at bothDecember 31, 2013. The plan was Underfunded at December 31, 20142016 and is reflected in the Underfunded Status table.2015.

Plans with an Underfunded Status    
($ in millions)2014 2013 

Fair value of plan assets at January 1

$200  - 

Actual return on assets

 12  - 

Contributions

 3  4 

Settlement

 (11 - 

Benefits paid

 (9 (4

Fair value of plan assets at December 31

$                    195  - 

Projected benefit obligation at January 1

$221                        32 

Service cost

 -  - 

Interest cost

 10  1 

Settlement

 (11 - 

Actuarial loss (gain)

 36  (2

Benefits paid

 (9 (4

Projected benefit obligation at December 31

$247  27 

Unfunded projected benefit obligation at December 31

$(52 (27

 

The estimated net actuarial loss for the defined benefit pension plansPlan that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost during 20152017 is $10$7 million. The estimated net prior service cost for the Plan that

for the defined benefit pension plan that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost during 20152017 is immaterial to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

The following table summarizes net periodic benefit cost and other changes in planthe Plan’s assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI for the years ended December 31:

 

($ in millions)2014 2013 2012 

Components of net periodic benefit cost:

Service cost

$-  -  - 

Interest cost

 10      10      10 

Expected return on assets

 (14 (13 (13

Amortization of net actuarial loss

 7  11  14 

Amortization of net prior service cost

 -  -  - 

Settlement

 5  5  6 

Net periodic benefit cost

$8  13  17 

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:

Net actuarial loss (gain)

$        37  (38 7 

Net prior service cost

 -  -  - 

Amortization of net actuarial loss

 (7 (11 (14

Amortization of prior service cost

 -  -  - 

Settlement

 (5 (5 (6

Total recognized in other comprehensive income

 25  (54 (13

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income

$33  (41 4 

 

 
($ in millions)  2016   2015         2014       

 

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost:

      

Interest cost

  $            9      9      10   

Expected return on assets

   (11)    (13)    (14) 

Amortization of net actuarial loss

   11      10      7   

Settlement

   7      7      5   

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $16      13      8   

 

 

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:

      

Net actuarial loss

  $2      9      37   

Amortization of net actuarial loss

   (11)    (10)    (7) 

Settlement

   (7)    (7)    (5) 

 

 

Total recognized in other comprehensive income

   (16)    (8)    25   

 

 

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income

  $-      5      33   

 

 

 

139153  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Fair Value Measurements of Plan Assets

The following table summarizestables summarize plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31:

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using(a) 
2014 ($ in millions)Level 1       Level 2       Level 3   Total Fair Value  

Equity securities:

Equity securities (Value)

$10  -  - $10         

Equity securities (Blended)(b)

 46  -  -  46         

Total equity securities

 56  -  -  56         

Mutual and exchange traded funds:

Money market funds

 7  -  -  7         

International funds

 -  38  -  38         

Domestic funds

 -  31  -  31         

Debt funds

 -  22  -  22         

Alternative strategies

 -  22  -  22         

Total mutual and exchange traded funds

 7  113  -  120         

Debt securities:

U.S. Treasury obligations

 3  -  -  3         

Agency mortgage-backed

 -  11  -  11         

Non-agency mortgage-backed

 -  2  -  2         

Corporate bonds(c)

 -  3  -  3         

Total debt securities

 3  16  -  19         

Total plan assets

$                        66  129  - $                    195          

  Fair Value Measurements Using(a) 
2013 ($ in millions)Level 1     Level 2       Level 3   Total Fair Value  

Equity securities:

Equity securities (Value)

$8  -  - $8         

Equity securities (Blended)(b)

 40  -  -  40         

Total equity securities

 48  -  -  48         

Mutual and exchange traded funds:

Money market funds

 7  -  -  7         

International funds

 -  43  -  43         

Domestic funds

 -  41  -  41         

Debt funds

 -  20  -  20         

Alternative strategies

 -  17  -  17         

Commodity funds

 6  -  -  6         

Total mutual and exchange traded funds

 

 13  121  -  134         

Debt securities:

U.S. Treasury obligations

 3  -  -  3         

Agency mortgage-backed

 -  13  -  13         

Non-agency mortgage-backed

 -  2  -  2         

Total debt securities

 3  15  -  18         

Total plan assets

$                        64  136  - $                    200         

 

 
  Fair Value Measurements Using(a) 
2016 ($ in millions) Level 1           Level 2     Level 3          Total Fair Value   

 

 

Equity securities(b)

         $56           -    -   56  

Mutual and exchange-traded funds:

      

Money market funds

  6           -    -   6  

International funds

  -           31    -   31  

Domestic funds

  -           39    -   39  

Debt funds

  -           5    -   5  

Alternative strategies

  1           9    -   10  

Commodity funds

  6           -    -   6  

 

 

Total mutual and exchange-traded funds

         $13           84    -   97  

Debt securities:

      

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  7           1    -   8  

Mortgage-backed securities:

      

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  -           1    -   1  

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  -           2    -   2  

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities(c)

  -           8    -   8  

 

 

Total debt securities

         $7           12    -   19  

 

 

Total plan assets

         $                76           96    -   172  

 

 

(a)     For further information on fair value hierarchy levels, refer to Note 1.

(b)     Includes holdings in Bancorp common stock.

(c)     Includes corporate bonds.

 

      

 

 
  Fair Value Measurements Using(a) 
2015 ($ in millions) Level 1            Level 2        Level 3      Total Fair Value 

 

 

Equity securities(b)

         $52           -    -   52  

Mutual and exchange-traded funds:

      

Money market funds

  15           -    -   15  

International funds

  -   ��       35    -   35  

Domestic funds

  -           31    -   31  

Debt funds

  -           3    -   3  

Alternative strategies

  -           11    -   11  

Commodity funds

  6           -    -   6  

 

 

Total mutual and exchange-traded funds

         $21           80    -   101  

Debt securities:

      

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  2           2    -   4  

Mortgage-backed securities:

      

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

  -           3    -   3  

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  -           2    -   2  

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  -           1    -   1  

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities(c)

  -           3    -   3  

 

 

Total debt securities

         $2           11    -   13  

 

 

Total plan assets

         $                75           91    -   166  

 

 
(a)

For further information on fair value hierarchy levels, refer to Note 1.

(b)

Includes holdings in Bancorp common stock.

(c)

Includes private label asset-backed securities.corporate bonds.

 

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Equity securities

The planPlan measures common stock using quoted prices which are available in an active market and classifies these investments within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

Mutual and exchange tradedexchange-traded funds

All of the plan’sPlan’s mutual and exchange tradedexchange-traded funds are publicly traded. The planPlan measures the value of these investments using the fund’s quoted prices thatwhich are available in an active market and classifies these investments within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities

include money market funds, alternative strategies and commodity funds. Where quoted prices are not available, the planPlan measures the fair value of these investments based on the redemption price of units held, which is based on the current fair value of the fund’s underlying assets. Unit values are determined by dividing the fund’s net assets at fair value by its units outstanding at the valuation dates to obtain the investment’s net asset value. Therefore, these investments such as international funds, domestic funds, debt funds and alternative strategies are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.

140  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Debt securities

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include U.S. Treasury obligations and federal agency securities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or DCFs.

154  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Examples of such instruments, which are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, include federal agencies securities, agency residential mortgage-backed securities, agency commercial mortgage-backed securities,non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds.asset-backed securities and other debt securities.

Plan Assumptions

The planPlan’s assumptions are evaluated annually and are updated as necessary. The discount rate assumption reflects the yield on a

portfolio of high quality fixed-income instruments that have a similar duration to the plan’sPlan’s liabilities. The expected long-term rate of return assumption reflects the average return expected on the assets invested to provide for the plan’sPlan’s liabilities. In determining the expected long-term rate of return, the Bancorp evaluated actuarial and economic inputs, including long-term inflation rate assumptions and broad equity and bond indices long-term return projections, as well as actual long-term historical plan performance. In 2014, the Bancorp updated the mortality assumption which resulted in an increase of $14 million to the projected benefit obligation.

 

The following table summarizes the weighted-average plan assumptions for the years ended December 31:

 

          2016             2015           2014   
20142013     2012             

For measuring benefit obligations at year end:

     

Discount rate

3.82% 4.72  3.83            3.97 %  4.16   3.82   

Rate of compensation increase

N/A(a) 4.00  4.00         

Rate of compensation increase(a)

   N/A   N/A   N/A   

Expected return on plan assets

7.25         7.50                  8.00            7.00   7.00   7.25   

For measuring net periodic benefit cost:

     

Discount rate

4.72 3.83  4.27            4.16   3.82   4.72   

Rate of compensation increase

N/A(a) 4.00  5.00         

Rate of compensation increase(a)

   N/A   N/A   N/A   

Expected return on plan assets

7.25 7.50  8.00            7.00   7.00   7.25   

(a)

Since the Bancorp’s qualified defined benefit plan’sPlan’s benefits were frozen, in 1998, except for grandfathered employees, the rate of compensation increase is no longer applicable beginning in 2014 since minimal grandfathered employees are still accruing benefits.

 

Lowering both the expected rate of return on the plan assets and the discount rate by 0.25% would have increased the 20142016 pension expense by approximately $1 million.

Based on the actuarial assumptions, the Bancorp expects to contribute $4$3 million to the planPlan in 2015.2017. Estimated pension benefit payments which reflect expected future service, are $22 million in 2015, $21 million in 2016, $19$18 million in 2017, $18$17 million in 2018, $16 million in 2019, $16 million in 2020 and $16 million in 2019.2021. The total estimated payments for the years 20202022 through 20242026 is $80$77 million.

Investment Policies and Strategies

The Bancorp’s policy for the investment of plan assets is to employ investment strategies that achieve a range of weighted-average target asset allocations relating to equity securities (including the Bancorp’s common stock), fixed-income securities (including U.S. Treasury and federal agency obligations,agencies securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and corporate bonds and notes)bonds), alternative strategies (including traditional mutual funds, precious metals and commodities) and cash.

 

The following table provides the Bancorp’s targeted and actual weighted-average asset allocations by asset category for the years ended December 31:

 

  Targeted Range(b)         2016             2015     
Targeted range   20142013            

Equity securities

        62%65            73 %  69   

Bancorp common stock

           22            2   2   

Total equity securities(a)

 39-78  %          6467           60-90 %   75   71   

Total fixed-income securities

 11-41               2022        

Fixed-income securities

   5-25    14   16   

Alternative strategies

 8-18               127           3-11    6   7   

Cash

 0-10                 44           0-13    5   6   

Total

       100%100            100 %  100   

(a)

Includes mutual and exchange tradedexchange-traded funds.

(b)

These reflect the targeted ranges for both the years endedDecember 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

The risk tolerance for the planPlan is determined by management to be “moderate to aggressive”, recognizing that higher returns involve some volatility and that periodic declines in the portfolio’s value are tolerated in an effort to achieve real capital growth. There were no significant concentrations of risk associated with the investments of the Bancorp’s benefit and retirement planPlan at December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015.

Permitted asset classes of the planPlan include cash and cash equivalents, fixed-income (domestic andnon-U.S. bonds), equities (U.S.,non-U.S., emerging markets and REITS), equipment leasing, precious metals, commodity transactions and mortgages. The planPlan utilizes derivative instruments including puts, calls, straddles or

other option strategies, as approved by management. Per ERISA, the Bancorp’s common stock cannot exceed 10% of the fair value of plan assets.

155  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fifth Third Bank, as Trustee, is expected to manage the plan assets in a manner consistent with the plan agreement and other regulatory, federal and state laws. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, $172 million and $166 million, respectively, of plan assets were managed by Fifth Third Bank. The Fifth Third Bank Pension, Profit Sharing401(k) and Medical Plan Committee (the “Committee”) is the plan administrator. The Trustee is required to provide to the Committee monthly and quarterly reports covering a list of plan assets, portfolio performance, transactions and asset allocation. The Trustee is also required to keep the Committee apprised of any

141  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

material changes in the Trustee’s outlook and recommended investment policy. There were no fees paid by the Plan for investment management, accounting or administrative services provided by the Trustee. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, Plan assets included $5 million and $4 million, respectively, of Bancorp common stock, which is below the 10% ERISA threshold previously discussed. Plan assets are not expected to be returned to the Bancorp during 2017.

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit plans was $247 million and $221 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Other Information on Retirement and Benefit Plans

Amounts relatingThe Bancorp has a qualified defined contribution savings plan that allows participants to make voluntary 401(k) contributions on apre-tax or Roth basis, subject to statutory limitations. The Bancorp amended and restated the qualified defined contribution savings plan in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2015. Beginning with the 2015 plan year, the Bancorp provides a higher company 401(k) match contribution. Expenses recognized for matching contributions to the Bancorp’s qualified defined benefit plans with assets exceeding benefit obligationscontribution savings plan were as follows at December 31:

($ in millions)2014     2013             

Projected benefit obligation

$-    194         

Accumulated benefit obligation

 -    194         

Fair value of plan assets

 -                200         

 

Amounts relating to the Bancorp’s defined benefit plans with benefit obligations exceeding assets were as follows at December 31:

 

  

($ in millions)2014     2013             

Projected benefit obligation

$                247  27         

Accumulated benefit obligation

 247  27         

Fair value of plan assets

 195  -         

As of$75 million, $71 million and $44 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and 2013, $195 million and $200 million, respectively, of plan assets were managed by Fifth Third Bank, a subsidiary ofrespectively. The Bancorp did not make profit sharing contributions during the Bancorp. Plan assets included $4 million of Bancorp common stock as ofyears ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013, respectively. Plan assets are not expected to be returned to the Bancorp during 2015.

The Bancorp’s profit sharing plan expense was $19 million $32for the year ended December 31, 2014. In addition, the Bancorp has anon-qualified defined contribution plan that allows certain employees to make voluntary contributions into a deferred compensation plan. Expenses recognized by the Bancorp for itsnon-qualified defined contribution plan were $3 million and $46 million for both of the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016 and 2012, respectively. Expenses recognized for matching contributions to the Bancorp’s defined contribution savings plans were $44 million, $43 million2015 and $42$2 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

2014.

 

 

142156  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

22. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

The tables below presentpresents the activity of the components of OCI and AOCI for the years ended December 31:

 

  

Total Other

Comprehensive Income

 

Total Accumulated Other

Comprehensive Income

 
($ in millions)Pretax
Activity
 

Tax

Effect

 

Net

Activity

 Beginning
Balance
 Net
Activity
 Ending
Balance
 

2014

Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities arising during period

$580   (202)   378      

Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

 (37)   13   (24)      

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

 543   (189)   354       121   354   475        

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

 60   (21)   39      

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

 (44)   15   (29)      

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

 16   (6)   10       13   10   23        

Net actuarial loss arising during the period

 (37)   12   (25)      

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

 12   (4)   8      

Defined benefit pension plans, net

 (25)     (17)       (52)   (17)   (69)        

Total

$          534   (187)   347       82   347   429        

2013

Unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities arising during period

$(454)   159   (295)      

Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income

   (2)   4      

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

 (448)   157   (291)       412   (291)   121        

Unrealized holding losses on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

 (13)     (8)      

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

 (44)   15   (29)      

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

 (57)   20   (37)       50   (37)   13        

Net actuarial gain arising during the period

 38   (13)   25      

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

 16   (6)   10      

Defined benefit pension plans, net

 54   (19)   35       (87)   35   (52)        

Total

$(451)   158   (293)       375   (293)   82        

2012

Unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities arising during period

$(97)   34   (63)      

Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income

 (15)     (10)      

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

 (112)   39   (73)       485   (73)   412        

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during period

 37   (13)   24      

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

 (83)   29   (54)      

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

 (46)   16   (30)       80   (30)   50        

Net actuarial loss arising during the period

 (7)     (5)      

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

 20   (7)               13      

Defined benefit pension plans, net

 13   (5)   8       (95)           8   (87)        

Total

$(145)               50   (95)               470   (95)           375        

 

      Total Other  Total Accumulated Other
      

              Comprehensive Income               

  

              Comprehensive Income               

      Pre-tax  Tax  Net    Beginning    Net      Ending    
($ in millions)     Activity  Effect  Activity    Balance    Activity      Balance    

 

2016

              

Unrealized holding losses onavailable-for-sale securities arising during the year

  $      (196)         66  (130)       

Reclassification adjustment for net gains onavailable-for-sale securities included in net income

          (11)           4      (7)       

 

      

Net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities

        (207)         70  (137)    238   (137)    101  

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during the year

           30          (11)     19        

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

          (48)         17    (31)       

 

      

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

          (18)           6    (12)      22     (12)      10  

Net actuarial loss arising during the year

            (2)           1      (1)       

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

           18            (6)     12        

 

      

Defined benefit pension plans, net

           16            (5)     11      (63)     11      (52) 

 

Total

  $      (209)         71  (138)    197   (138)      59  

 

              

 

      Total Other  Total Accumulated Other
      

Comprehensive Income

  

Comprehensive Income

      Pre-tax  Tax  Net    Beginning    Net  Ending
($ in millions)     Activity  Effect  Activity    Balance    Activity  Balance

 

2015

              

Unrealized holding losses onavailable-for-sale securities arising during the year

  $      (349)       122  (227)       

Reclassification adjustment for net gains onavailable-for-sale securities included in net income

          (16)           6    (10)       

 

      

Net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities

        (365)       128  (237)    475   (237)    238  

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during the year

           74          (26)     48        

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

          (75)         26    (49)       

 

      

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

            (1)          -      (1)      23       (1)      22  

Net actuarial loss arising during the year

            (9)           4      (5)       

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

           17            (6)     11        

 

      

Defined benefit pension plans, net

             8            (2)       6      (69)       6      (63) 

 

Total

  $      (358)       126  (232)    429   (232)    197  

 

 

143157  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

      Total Other  Total Accumulated Other
      

              Comprehensive Income               

  

              Comprehensive Income               

($ in millions)     Pre-tax
Activity
  Tax
Effect
  Net
Activity
    Beginning  
  Balance  
  Net
Activity
      Ending    
    Balance    

 

2014

              

Unrealized holding gains onavailable-for-sale securities arising during the year

  $       580       (202)   378        

Reclassification adjustment for net gains onavailable-for-sale securities included in net income

          (37)         13    (24)       

 

      

Net unrealized gains onavailable-for-sale securities

         543       (189)   354     121    354     475  

Unrealized holding gains on cash flow hedge derivatives arising during the year

           60         (21)     39        

Reclassification adjustment for net gains on cash flow hedge derivatives included in net income

          (44)         15    (29)       

 

      

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

           16           (6)     10       13      10       23  

Net actuarial loss arising during the year

          (37)         12    (25)       

Reclassification of amounts to net periodic benefit costs

           12           (4)       8        

 

      

Defined benefit pension plans, net

          (25)          8    (17)     (52)    (17)     (69) 

 

Total

  $       534       (187)   347       82    347     429  

 

The table below presents reclassifications out of AOCI for the years ended December 31:

 

 

Components of AOCI: ($ in millions) 

Affected Line Item in the

Consolidated Statements of Income

     2014         2013           

Consolidated Statements of

Income Caption

       2016                 2015                 2014        

 

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:(b)

      

Net gains (losses) included in net income

Securities gains, net$ 37  (6)  

Net gains included in net income

  

Securities gains, net

 

$

 11  16  37 
     

 

 

     

 

Income before income taxes 37  (6)    

Income before income taxes

  11  16  37 
Applicable income tax expense (13    

Applicable income tax expense

  (4) (6 (13)
     

 

 

     

 

Net income 24  (4)    

Net income

   10  24 
     

 

 

     

 

Net unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives:(b)

      

Interest rate contracts related to C&I loans

Interest and fees on loans and leases 44  45    

Interest and fees on loans and leases

  48  75  44 

Interest rate contracts related to long-term debt

Interest on long-term debt -  (1)  
     

 

 

     

 

Income before income taxes 44  44    

Income before income taxes

  48  75  44 
Applicable income tax expense (15 (15)    

Applicable income tax expense

  (17) (26 (15)
     

 

 

     

 

Net income 29  29    

Net income

  31  49  29 
     

 

 

     

 

Net periodic benefit costs:(b)

      

Amortization of net actuarial loss

Employee benefits expense(a) (7 (11)    

Employee benefits expense(a)

  (11) (10 (7)

Settlements

Employee benefits expense(a) (5 (5)    

Employee benefits expense(a)

  (7) (7 (5)
     

 

 

     

 

Income before income taxes (12 (16)    

Income before income taxes

  (18) (17 (12)
Applicable income tax expense 4     

Applicable income tax expense

   6  
     

 

 

     

 

Net income (8 (10)    

Net income

  (12) (11 (8)
     

 

 

     

 

      

 

Total reclassifications for the period

  Net income        $  45  15    

Net income

 

$

 26  48  45 

 

(a)

This AOCI component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. Refer to Note 21 for information on the computation of net periodic benefit cost.

(b)

Amounts in parentheses indicate reductions to net income.

 

144158  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

23. COMMON, PREFERRED AND TREASURY STOCK

 

The following istable presents a summary of the share activity within common, preferred and treasury stock for the years ended:

 

  Common Stock Preferred Stock Treasury Stock           Common Stock                   Preferred Stock                   Treasury Stock        
($ in millions, except share data)  Value Shares Value Shares Value Shares             Value           Shares             Value         Shares               Value       Shares    

December 31, 2011

$ 2,051  923,892,581 $398  16,450 $(64 4,088,145  

Shares acquired for treasury

 -     -     -     -     (627 42,424,014  

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

 -     -     -     -     54  (4,654,165)  

Other

 -     -     -     -     3  (117,470)  

December 31, 2012

$ 2,051  923,892,581 $398  16,450 $(634 41,740,524  

Shares acquired for treasury

 -     -     -     -     (1,242 65,516,126  

Issuance of preferred shares, Series I

 -     -     441  18,000  -     -     

Issuance of preferred shares, Series H

 -     -     593  24,000  -     -     

Redemption of preferred shares, Series G

 -     -     (398 (16,450 540  (35,529,018)  

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

 -     -     -     -     38  (3,697,042)  

Other

 -     -     -     -     3  556,246  

December 31, 2013

$ 2,051  923,892,581 $1,034  42,000 $(1,295 68,586,836     $    2,051    923,892,581    $    1,034    42,000    $    (1,295 68,586,836 

Shares acquired for treasury

 -     -     -     -     (726 34,799,873     -    -    -    -    (726 34,799,873 

Issuance of preferred shares, Series J

 -     -     297  12,000  -          -    -    297    12,000    -  -  

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

 -     -     -     -     47  (3,493,671)     -    -    -    -    47  (3,493,671)

Other

 -     -     -     -     2  (47,409)     -    -    -    -    2  (47,409)

December 31, 2014

$         2,051  923,892,581 $        1,331  54,000 $        (1,972 99,845,629     $    2,051    923,892,581    $    1,331    54,000    $    (1,972 99,845,629 

Shares acquired for treasury

   -    -    -    -    (847 42,607,855 

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

   -    -    -    -    52  (3,593,406)

Other

   -    -    -    -    3  (47,811)

December 31, 2015

   $    2,051    923,892,581    $    1,331    54,000    $    (2,764 138,812,267 

Shares acquired for treasury

   -    -    -    -    (668 34,633,221 

Impact of stock transactions under stock compensation plans, net

   -    -    -    -    (4 42,357 

Other

   -    -    -    -    3  (74,563)

December 31, 2016

   $    2,051    923,892,581    $    1,331    54,000    $    (3,433 173,413,282 

 

Preferred Stock—Series J

On June 5, 2014, the Bancorp issued, in a registered public offering, 300,000 depositary shares, representing 12,000 shares of 4.90% fixed-to-floating rate fixed to floating-ratenon-cumulative Series J perpetual preferred stock, for net proceeds of $297 million. Each preferred share has a $25,000 liquidation preference. The preferred stock accrues dividends, on anon-cumulative semi-annual basis, at an annual rate of 4.90% through but excluding September 30, 2019, at which time it converts to a quarterly floating ratefloating-rate dividend of three-month LIBOR plus 3.129%. Subject to any required regulatory approval, the Bancorp may redeem the Series J preferred shares at its option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after September 30, 2019, or any time prior following a regulatory capital event. The Series J preferred shares are not convertible into Bancorp common shares or any other securities.

Preferred Stock—Series I

On December 9, 2013, the Bancorp issued, in a registered public offering, 18,000,000 depositary shares, representing 18,000 shares of 6.625% fixed-to-floating rate fixed to floating-ratenon-cumulative Series I perpetual preferred stock, for net proceeds of $441 million. Each preferred share has a $25,000 liquidation preference. The preferred stock accrues dividends, on anon-cumulative quarterly basis, at an annual rate of 6.625% through but excluding December 31, 2023, at which time it converts to a quarterly floating ratefloating-rate dividend of three-month LIBOR plus 3.71%. Subject to any required regulatory approval, the Bancorp may redeem the Series I preferred shares at its option in whole or in part, at any time on or after December 31, 2023 and may redeem in whole but not in part, following a regulatory capital event at any time prior to December 31, 2023. The Series I preferred shares are not convertible into Bancorp common shares or any other securities.

Preferred Stock—Series H

On May 16, 2013, the Bancorp issued, in a registered public offering, 600,000 depositary shares, representing 24,000 shares of 5.10% fixed-to-floating rate fixed to floating-ratenon-cumulative Series H perpetual preferred stock, for net proceeds of $593 million. Each preferred share has a $25,000 liquidation preference. The preferred stock accrues dividends, on anon-cumulative semi-annual basis, at an annual rate of 5.10% through but excluding June 30, 2023, at which

time it converts to a quarterly floating ratefloating-rate dividend of three-month LIBOR plus 3.033%. Subject to any required regulatory approval, the Bancorp may redeem the Series H preferred shares at its option in whole or in part, at any time on or

after June 30, 2023 and may redeem in whole but not in part, following a regulatory capital event at any time prior to June 30, 2023. The Series H preferred shares are not convertible into Bancorp common shares or any other securities.

Preferred Stock—Series G

In 2008, the Bancorp issued 8.50% non-cumulative Series G convertible preferred stock. The depositary shares represented 1/250th of a share of Series G convertible preferred stock and had a liquidation preference of $25,000 per preferred share of Series G stock. The preferred stock was convertible at any time, at the option of the shareholder, into 2,159.8272 shares of common stock, representing a conversion price of approximately $11.575 per share of common stock.

On June 11, 2013, pursuant to the Amended Articles of Incorporation, the Bancorp’s Board of Directors authorized the conversion into common stock, no par value, of all outstanding shares of the Bancorp’s Series G perpetual preferred stock. The Articles grant the Bancorp the right, at its option, to convert all outstanding shares of Series G preferred stock if the closing price of common stock exceeded 130% of the applicable conversion price for 20 trading days within any period of 30 consecutive trading days. The closing price of shares of common stock satisfied such threshold for the 30 trading days ended June 10, 2013, and the Bancorp gave the required notice of its exercise of its conversion right.

On July 1, 2013, the Bancorp converted the remaining 16,442 outstanding shares of Series G preferred stock, which represented 4,110,500 depositary shares, into shares of Fifth Third’s common stock. Each share of Series G preferred stock was converted into 2,159.8272 shares of common stock, representing a total of 35,511,740 issued shares. The common shares issued in the conversion are exempt securities pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the securities exchanged were exclusively with the Bancorp’s existing security holders where no commission or other remuneration was paid. Upon conversion, the

145  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

depositary shares were delisted from the NASDAQ Global Select Market and withdrawn from the Exchange.

Treasury Stock

On March 13, 2012, the Bancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the FRB as part of the 2012 CCAR. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the repurchase of common shares in an amount equal to any after-tax gains realized by the Bancorp from the sale of Vantiv, Inc. common shares by either the Bancorp or Vantiv, Inc. On August 21, 2012, the Bancorp announced that the FRB did not object to its capital plan resubmitted under the 2012 CCAR process, which included the repurchases of common shares of up to $600 million through the first quarter of 2013, in addition to any incremental repurchase of common shares related to any after-tax gains realized by the Bancorp from the sale of Vantiv, Inc. common shares by either the Bancorp or Vantiv, Inc. As a result, on August 21, 2012, Fifth Third’s Board of Directors authorized the Bancorp to repurchase up to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions.

On March 14, 2013, the Bancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the FRB as part of the 2013 CCAR. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the potential repurchase of common shares in an amount up to $984 million, including any shares issued in a Series G preferred stock conversion, and the repurchase of common shares in an amount equal to any after-tax gains realized by the Bancorp from the sale of Vantiv, Inc. common stock. On March 19, 2013, the Board of Directors authorized the Bancorp to repurchase up to 100 million common shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to effect share repurchase transactions. This share repurchase authorization replaced the Board’s previous authorization from August of 2012.

On March 18, 2014,15, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the Bancorp to repurchase up to 100 million common shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to effect share repurchase transactions. This share repurchase authorization replaced the Board’s previous authorization from March of 2013.2014.

On March 26, 2014, the Bancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the FRB as part of the 2014 CCAR. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the potential repurchase of $669 million of common shares with the additional ability to repurchase common shares in an amount equal to anyafter-tax gains realized by the Bancorp from the sale of Vantiv, Inc. common stock for the period beginning April 1, 2014 and ending March 31, 2015.

On March 11, 2015, the Bancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the FRB as part of the 2015 CCAR. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the potential repurchase of $765 million of common shares with the additional ability to repurchase common shares in an amount equal to anyafter-tax gains realized by the Bancorp from the sale of Vantiv, Inc. common stock for the period beginning April 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2016.

On June 29, 2016, the Bancorp announced the results of its capital plan submitted to the FRB as part of the 2016 CCAR. The FRB indicated to the Bancorp that it did not object to the potential repurchase of $660 million of common shares with the additional ability to repurchase common shares in an amount equal to anyafter-tax gains realized by the Bancorp from the sale of Vantiv, Inc. common stock or from the termination and settlement of any portion of the TRA with Vantiv Inc., if executed, for the period beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017.

The Bancorp entered into a number of accelerated share repurchase transactions during 2012, 2013the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.2016. As part of these transactions, the Bancorp entered into forward contracts in which the final number of shares delivered at settlement was based generally on a discount to the average daily volume weighted averageweighted-average price of the Bancorp’s common stock during the term of these repurchase agreements.

159  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accelerated share repurchases were treated as two separate transactionstransactions: (i) the acquisitionrepurchase of treasury shares on the acquisitionrepurchase date and (ii) a forward contract indexed to the Bancorp’s common stock.

 

146  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following table presents a summary of the Bancorp’s accelerated share repurchase transactions that were entered into or settled during 2012, 2013the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. For more information on a subsequent event related to capital actions refer to Note 31 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.2016:

 

Repurchase Date    Amount ($ in millions)  

 

    Shares Repurchased on 
    Repurchase Date

  Shares Received from Forward 
Contract Settlement
     Total Shares    
    Repurchased     
   Settlement Date 

April 26, 2012

$75  4,838,710  631,986  5,470,696  June 1, 2012  

August 28, 2012

 350  21,531,100  1,444,047  22,975,147  October 24, 2012  

November 9, 2012

 125  7,710,761  657,914  8,368,675            February 12, 2013  

December 19, 2012

 100  6,267,410  127,760  6,395,170  February 27, 2013  

January 31, 2013

 125  6,953,028  849,037  7,802,065  April 5, 2013  

May 24, 2013

 539  25,035,519  4,270,250  29,305,769  October 1, 2013  

November 18, 2013

 200  8,538,423  1,132,495  9,670,918  March 5, 2014  

December 13, 2013

 456  19,084,195  2,294,932  21,379,127  March 31, 2014  

January 31, 2014

 99  3,950,705  602,109  4,552,814  March 31, 2014  

May 1, 2014

 150  6,216,480  1,016,514  7,232,994  July 21, 2014  

July 24, 2014

 225  9,352,078  1,896,685  11,248,763  October 14, 2014  

October 23, 2014

 180  8,337,875  794,245  9,132,120  January 8, 2015  

 

       Shares Repurchased on        Shares Received from Forward    Total Shares         
Repurchase Date Amount ($ in millions)        Repurchase Date    Contract Settlement    Repurchased        Settlement Date    

 

October 23, 2014

 180    8,337,875    794,245    9,132,120    January 8, 2015

January 27, 2015

 180    8,542,713    1,103,744    9,646,457    April 28, 2015

April 30, 2015

 155    6,704,835    842,655    7,547,490    July 31, 2015

August 3, 2015

 150    6,039,792    1,346,314    7,386,106    September 3, 2015

September 9, 2015

 150    6,538,462    1,446,613    7,985,075    October 23, 2015

December 14, 2015

 215    9,248,482    1,782,477    11,030,959    January 14, 2016

March 4, 2016

 240    12,623,762    1,868,379    14,492,141    April 11, 2016

August 5, 2016

 240    10,979,548    1,099,205    12,078,753    November 7, 2016

December 20, 2016

 155    4,843,750    1,044,362    5,888,112    February 6, 2017

 

Open Market Share Repurchase Transactions

Between June 17, 2016 and June 20, 2016, the Bancorp repurchased 1,436,100 shares, or approximately $26 million, of its outstanding common stock through open market repurchase transactions.

24. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

The Bancorp has historically emphasized employee stock ownership. The following table provides detail of the number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock-based awards

and remaining shares available for future issuance under

all of the Bancorp’s equity compensation plans approved by shareholders as of December 31, 2014:2016:

 

 

Plan Category (shares in thousands)

 

 Number of Shares to be 
Issued Upon Exercise

     Weighted-Average    
Exercise Price
 Shares Available for
Future Issuance
   Number of Shares to be
Issued Upon Exercise
 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price Per Share
     Shares Available for  
  Future Issuance  

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

             30,786 (a)         

Equity compensation plans

     18,478 (a)(f)  

SARs

 (b)   (b)       (a)           (b)  N/A       

(a)      

Restricted stock

 7,253   N/A        (a)        

RSAs

   4,638  N/A       (a)      

RSUs

   5,086  N/A       (a)      

Stock options(c)

  $32.26        (a)           7  $32.26       (a)      

Phantom stock units

 (d)   N/A    N/A             

Performance units

 (e)   N/A        (a)        

PSAs

   (d)  N/A       (a)      

Employee stock purchase plan

 7,431 (f)              6,129 (e)       

Total shares

 7,260   38,217               9,731    24,607             

(a)

Under the 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan, 36 million shares of stock were authorized for issuance as incentive and nonqualifiedSARs, RSAs, RSUs, stock options, SARs, restrictedperformance share or unit awards, dividend or dividend equivalent rights and stock and restricted stock units, performance units and performance RSAs.awards.

(b)

The number of shares to be issued upon exercise will be determined at vestingexercise based on the difference between the grant price and the market price aton the date of exercise and the calculation of taxes owed on the exercise.

(c)

Excludes 0.30.02 million outstanding options awarded under plans assumed by the Bancorp in connection with certain mergers and acquisitions. The Bancorp has not made any awards under these plans and will make no additional awards under these plans. The weighted-average exercise price of thethese outstanding options is $13.76$14.05 per share.

(d)

Phantom stock units are settled in cash.

(e)

The number of shares to be issued is dependent upon the Bancorp achieving certain predefined performance targets and ranges from zero shares to approximately 2 million shares.

(f)(e)

Represents remaining shares of Fifth Third common stock under the Bancorp’s 1993 Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated, including an additional 1.5 million shares approved by shareholders on March 28, 2007 and an additional 12 million shares approved by shareholders on April 21, 2009.

(f)

Includes 4 million shares for Full Value Awards.

 

Stock-based awards are eligible for issuance under the Bancorp’s Incentive Compensation Plan to executives, directors and key employees and directors of the Bancorp and its subsidiaries. The Incentive Compensation Plan was approved by shareholders on April 15, 2014 and authorized the issuance of up to 36 million shares, including 16 million shares for Full Value Awards, as equity compensation and provides for incentive and nonqualifiedSARs, RSAs, RSUs, stock options, SARs, RSAsperformance share or unit awards, dividend or dividend equivalent rights and restricted stock units, and performance shares.awards. Full Value Awards are defined as awards with no cash outlay for the employee to obtain the full value. Based on total stock-based awards outstanding (including SARs, RSAs, RSUs, stock options stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and performance units)PSAs) and shares remaining for future grants under the 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan, the potential dilution to which the Bancorp’s shareholders of common stock are exposed due to the potential that stock-based compensation will be awarded to executives, directors or key

employees of the Bancorp and its subsidiaries is 10%9%. SARs, restricted stock,RSAs, RSUs, stock options and performance unitsPSAs outstanding represent seven percent7% of the Bancorp’s issued shares at December 31, 2014.2016.

All of the Bancorp’s stock-based awards are to be settled with stock. The Bancorp has historically used treasury stock to settle stock-based awards, when available. SARs, issued at fair value based on the closing price of the Bancorp’s common stock on the date of grant, have up to ten-yearten year terms and vest and become exercisable either ratably or fully over a four year period of continued employment. The Bancorp does not grant discounted SARs or stock options,re-price previously granted SARs or stock options or grant reload stock options. Restricted stock award grants vestRSAs and RSUs are released after three or four years or ratably over three or four years of continued employment andemployment. RSAs include dividend and voting rights.rights while RSUs receive dividend equivalents only. Stock options were previously issued at fair value based on the closing price of the Bancorp’s common stock on the date of grant, havehad up to ten-yearten year terms and vested and became fully exercisable ratably over a three or four year period of continued employment. Performance unit awards

160  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PSAs have three-yearthree year cliff vesting terms with market conditions and/or performance conditions as defined by the plan. All of the Bancorp’s executive stock-based awards contain an annual performance hurdle of two percent2% return on tangible common equity. If this threshold is not met, all awards

147  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PSAs that would vest in the next year are forfeited.forfeited and all SARs and RSAs that would vest in the next year may also be forfeited at the discretion of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Bancorp met this threshold as of December 31, 2014.2016.

Stock-based compensation expense was $83$111 million, $78$100 million and $69$83 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively, and is included in salaries, wages and incentives in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The total related income tax benefit recognized was $30$39 million, $28$36 million

and $24$30 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively.

Stock Appreciation Rights

The Bancorp uses assumptions, which are evaluated and revised as necessary, in estimating the grant-date fair value of each SAR grant.

 

 

The weighted-average assumptions were as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

  2016             2015               2014            
2014 2013 2012 

Expected life (in years)

 6     6     6       6  6   6    

Expected volatility

 35%   36%   37%     37 35   35    

Expected dividend yield

 2.4%   3.0%   2.8%     3.1  2.7   2.4    

Risk-free interest rate

 2.0%                       1.0%                       1.2%     1.5  1.6   2.0    

 

The expected life is generally derived from historical exercise patterns and represents the amount of time that SARs granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected volatility is based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities of the Bancorp’s common stock. The expected dividend yield is based on annual dividends divided by the Bancorp’s stock price. Annual dividends are based on projected dividends, estimated using an expected long-term dividend payout ratio, over the estimated life of the awards. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the SARs is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

The grant-date fair value of SARs is measured using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Themodel.The weighted-average grant-date fair value of SARs granted was $6.53, $4.56$5.16, $5.52 and $4.23$6.53 per share for the years ended 2014, 2013December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. The total grant-date fair value of SARs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 was $34$32 million, $29$35 million and $22$34 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2014,2016, there was $57$40 million of stock-based compensation expense related to nonvestedoutstanding SARs not yet recognized. The expense is expected to be recognized over aan estimated remaining weighted-average period at December 31, 2016 of approximately 2.4 years.

 

 

 

2014

 2013 2012 

SARs (Number of SARs in thousands)    Number of
    SARs
        Weighted-
       Average
        Grant Price
     Number of
    SARs
     Weighted-
    Average
    Grant Price
     Number of
    SARs
       Weighted-
      Average
      Grant Price
 
 2016 2015 2014
SARs (in thousands, except per share data)     Number of
    SARs
 Weighted-
  Average Grant  
  Price Per Share  
     Number of
    SARs
 Weighted-
  Average Grant  
  Price Per Share  
     Number of
    SARs
 Weighted-
  Average Grant  
  Price Per Share  

Outstanding at January 1

           48,599    $        19.98    44,120      $        20.41      36,502   $        22.20         44,129    $   19.14 45,590    $  19.79 48,599    $   19.98

Granted

 4,526     21.63    10,267       16.16      12,179    14.36         6,379       17.68 5,219      18.99 4,526       21.63

Exercised

 (4,408)     13.63    (2,904)       11.18      (1,271)    6.29         (6,291)      14.47 (3,242)     13.59 (4,408)      13.63

Forfeited or expired

 (3,127)     34.19    (2,884)       21.78      (3,290)    23.33         (4,176)      32.02 (3,438)     32.96 (3,127)      34.19

Outstanding at December 31

 45,590    $19.79    48,599      $19.98      44,120   $20.41         40,041    $   18.30 44,129    $  19.14 45,590    $   19.79

Exercisable at December 31

 27,950    $21.71    26,462      $24.14      23,248   $26.76         26,898    $   18.28 29,721    $  19.71 27,950    $   21.71

The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable SARs by grant price per share at December 31, 2014:2016:

 

Outstanding SARs   Exercisable SARs 

Grant price per share    Number of
    SARs at
    Year End
    (000s)
       Weighted-
      Average
      Grant Price
 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
    Contractual    
Life

(in years)

       Number of
    SARs at
    Year End
    (000s)
       Weighted-
      Average
      Grant Price
 

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
    Contractual    
Life

(in years)

 
 Outstanding SARs Exercisable SARs
SARs (in thousands, except per share data)       Number of
      SARs
 Weighted-
Average Grant
Price Per Share
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
  Contractual Life  
(in years)
     Number of
    SARs
 Weighted-
Average Grant
Price Per Share
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
  Contractual Life  
(in years)

Under $10.00

 3,363   $3.98    4.3        3,360   $3.99    4.3        2,195    $     3.98     2.3 2,195    $     3.98      2.3

$10.01-$20.00

 29,089    15.36    6.7        15,783    15.54    5.9        30,446       16.36     6.1 19,125       15.51      4.7

$20.01-$30.00

 4,362    21.64    9.3        31    22.73    3.4        3,513       21.64     7.3 1,691       21.65      7.2

$30.01-$40.00

 6,443    38.67    1.7        6,443    38.67    1.7        3,305       38.27     0.3 3,305       38.27      0.3

Over $40.00

 2,333    42.16    0.8         2,333    42.16    0.8        582       40.11     0.3 582       40.11      0.3

All SARs

 45,590   $          19.79    5.8         27,950   $          21.71    4.3        40,041    $   18.30     5.4 26,898    $   18.28      4.0

 

Restricted Stock Awards

The total grant-date fair value of RSAs that vestedwere released during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 was $32$55 million, $40$43 million and $32 million, respectively. At December 31, 2014,2016, there

was $88$52 million of stock-

basedstock-based compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stockoutstanding RSAs not yet recognized. The expense is expected to be recognized over aan estimated remaining weighted-average period at December 31, 2016 of approximately 2.62.0 years.

 

 

148161  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

  

 

2014

 2013 2012 
RSAs (shares in thousands)        Shares        Weighted-
    Average
         Grant-Date    
    Fair Value
 Shares     Weighted-
    Average
         Grant-Date    
    Fair Value
 Shares       Weighted-
    Average
         Grant-Date    
    Fair Value
 

Nonvested at January 1

 6,710  $      15.11          6,379  $        14.32          4,764  $      15.95         

Granted

 3,264   21.61          3,583   16.21          3,863   14.33         

Exercised

   (2,183)   14.84            (2,720)   14.71            (1,826)   18.37         

Forfeited

 (538)   16.73          (532)   14.97          (422)   15.35         

Nonvested at December 31

 7,253  $17.98          6,710  $15.11          6,379  $14.32         

 

               2016                                   2015                               2014                
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

RSAs (in thousands, except per share data)  Shares  

  Weighted-Average  
Grant-Date

Fair Value

Per Share

   Shares  

  Weighted-Average  
  Grant-Date  

  Fair Value  

  Per Share  

   Shares  

Weighted-Average 
Grant-Date 

Fair Value 

Per Share 

 

Outstanding at January 1

   8,281  $18.88            7,253  $17.98            6,710  $15.11    

Granted

   3   20.65            4,250   19.11            3,264   21.61    

Released

   (3,090  17.92            (2,580  16.86            (2,183  14.84    

Forfeited

   (556  19.20            (642  18.64            (538  16.73    

 

Outstanding at December 31

   4,638  $19.44            8,281  $18.88            7,253  $17.98    

 

The following table summarizes outstanding RSAs by grant-date fair value at December 31, 2016:

 

 

   Outstanding RSAs
RSAs (in thousands)                  Shares       Weighted-Average      
Remaining      
Contractual Life      
(in years)      

 

$15.01-$20.00

   3,187    1.2   

Over $20.00

   1,451    1.0   

 

All RSAs

   4,638    1.1   

 

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes unvested RSAs bytotal grant-date fair value of RSUs that were released during both the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2 million. At December 31, 2016, there was $57 million of stock-based

compensation expense related to outstanding RSUs not yet recognized. The expense is expected to be recognized over an estimated remaining weighted-average period at December 31, 2014:2016 of 2.9 years.

 

  Nonvested RSAs 
Grant-Date Fair Value Per ShareNumber of
    RSAs at Year End    
(000s)
 

    Weighted-Average    
Remaining

Contractual Life

(in years)

 

Under $5.00

 -            -            

$5.01-$10.00

 48            0.8��          

$10.01-$15.00

 1,801            0.7           

$15.01-$20.00

 2,320            1.3           

$20.01-$25.00

 3,084            1.8           

All RSAs

 7,253            1.4           

 

   2016   2015
  

 

 

   

 

 

      Weighted-Average      Weighted-Average
      Grant-Date      Grant-Date
      Fair Value      Fair Value
RSUs (in thousands, except per unit data)              Units  Per Unit               Units   Per Unit

 

Outstanding at January 1

   371  $19.56            -  $N/A   

Granted

   5,029   17.75            377   19.58   

Released

   (79  19.76            (5  21.63   

Forfeited

   (235  17.89            (1  19.46   

 

Outstanding at December 31

   5,086  $17.84            371  $19.56   

 

The following table summarizes outstanding RSUs by grant-date fair value at December 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

           Outstanding RSUs        
RSUs (in thousands)                  Units       Weighted-Average    
Remaining    
Contractual Life    
(in years)     

 

$10.01-$15.00

   638       1.1  

$15.01-$20.00

   4,265       1.8  

$20.01-$25.00

   159       2.0  

$25.01-$30.00

   24       2.1  

 

All RSUs

   5,086       1.7  

 

 

Stock optionsOptions

The grant-date fair value of stock options is measured using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Theremodel.There were no stock options granted during 2014, 2013the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2012.2014.

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $1 million for both the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Cash received from stock options exercised was $1 million, in 2014, 2013$2 million and 2012, respectively. Cash received from options exercised was $1 million infor the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and $2 million in both 2013 and

2012.respectively. The tax benefit realized from exercised stock options was immaterial to the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements during 2014, 2013the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2012.2014. All stock options were vested as of December 31, 2008, therefore, no stock options vested during 2014, 2013the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 or 2012.2014. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the aggregate intrinsic value of both outstanding stock options and exercisable stock options was $2 million.immaterial.

 

 

  

 

2014

 2013 2012 
Stock Options (Number of Options in thousands)    Number of  
    Options  
     Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise Price    
 Number of  
Options  
     Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise Price    
 Number of  
Options  
     Weighted-
    Average
        Grant Price    
 

Outstanding at January 1

 546    $20.72          3,877      $    45.00            7,584    $        53.88       

Exercised

 (115)     12.84          (190)       11.88            (205)     10.32       

Forfeited or expired

 (166)     36.42          (3,141)       51.23            (3,502)     66.25       

Outstanding at December 31

 265    $14.25          546      $20.72            3,877    $45.00       

Exercisable at December 31

 265    $14.25          546      $20.72            3,877    $45.00       

The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable stock options by exercise price at December 31, 2014:

  Outstanding and Exercisable Stock Options 
Exercise price per share    Number of
    Options at Year
    End (000s)
     Weighted-
    Average
    Exercise Price
     Weighted-Average
    Remaining
     Contractual Life
    (in years)
 

Under $10.00

 1     $8.59          4.0       

$10.01-$20.00

 258      13.76          1.0       

$20.01-$30.00

 1      24.41          3.0       

$30.01-$40.00

 -      -          -       

Over $40.00

 5      40.98          2.0       

All stock options

 265     $      14.25          1.0       

149162  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

  2016  2015  2014
Stock Options (in thousands, except per share data) Number of
Options
  

Weighted-Average  
Exercise Price  

Per Share  

  Number of
Options
  

Weighted-Average  
Exercise Price  

Per Share  

  Number of 
Options 
  Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share

 

Outstanding at January 1

  119      $14.97           265     $14.25            546       $20.72   

Exercised

  (94)     13.86           (126)     13.67            (115)       12.84   

Forfeited or expired

  -       -            (20)     13.59            (166)       36.42   

 

Outstanding at December 31

  25      $19.17           119     $14.97            265       $14.25   

 

Exercisable at December 31

  25      $19.17           119     $14.97            265       $14.25   

 

The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable stock options by exercise price per share at December 31, 2016:

 

 

Stock Options (in thousands, except per share data)  

Number of

Options

   

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price

Per Share

   Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)

 

Under $10.00   1     $8.59         2.0        

$10.01-$20.00

   18      14.05         0.1        

$20.01-$30.00

   1      24.41         1.0        

$30.01-$40.00

   -      -         -        

Over $40.00

   5      40.98         -        

 

All stock options

   25     $19.17         0.2        

 

 

Other stock-based compensationStock-Based Compensation

The Bancorp’s Board of Directors previously approved the use of phantom stock units as part of its compensation for executives in connection with changes made in reaction to the TARP compensation rules. On February 22, 2011, the Bancorp redeemed its Series F preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury under the CPP. As a result of this redemption, the last payment of phantom stock occurred in April of 2011. The phantom stock units were issued under the Bancorp’s 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan. The number of phantom stock units was determined each pay period by dividing the amount of salary to be paid in phantom stock units for that pay period, by the reported closing price of the Bancorp’s common stock on the pay date for such pay period. The phantom stock units vested immediately on issuance. Phantom stock was expensed based on the number of outstanding units multiplied by the closing price of the Bancorp’s stock at period end. The phantom stock units did not include any rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents. Phantom stock units issued on or before June 12, 2010 were settled in cash upon the earlier to occur of June 15, 2011 or the executive’s death. Units issued thereafter were settled in cash with 50% settled on June 15, 2012 and 50% settled on June 15, 2013. The amount paid on settlement of the phantom stock units was equal to the total amount of phantom stock units settled at the reported closing price of the Bancorp’s common stock on the settlement date. Under the phantom stock program, no phantom stock units were granted during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. No phantom stock units were settled during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 200,130 and 199,813 phantom stock units were settled during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Performance unitsPSAs are payable contingent upon the Bancorp achieving certain predefined performance targets over the three-year measurement period. Awards granted during 2014, 2013the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 20122014 will be entirely settled in stock. The performance targets are based on the Bancorp’s performance relative to a defined peer group. During both 2016 and 2015, PSAs used a performance-based metric based on return on tangible common equity in relation to peers, whereas during 2014, 2013a market-based metric was used which assessed the stock price performance in relation to peers. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2012, 2014, 583,608, 458,355 and

322,567 348,595, and 344,741 performance units,PSAs, respectively, were granted by the Bancorp. These awards were granted at a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $15.61, $16.15$14.87, $19.48 and $14.36$15.61 per unit during 2014, 2013the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively.

The Bancorp sponsors aan employee stock purchase plan that allows qualifying employees to purchase shares of the Bancorp’s common stock with a 15% match. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, there were 599,101, 690,039684,885, 617,829 and 827,709599,101 shares, respectively, purchased by participants and the Bancorp recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1 million in each of the respective years.

 

150163  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

25. OTHER NONINTEREST INCOME AND OTHER NONINTEREST EXPENSE

 

The following table presents the major components of other noninterest income and other noninterest expense for the years ended December 31:

($ in millions)2014         2013         2012        

Other noninterest income:

Gain on Vantiv, Inc. IPO and sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares

$148       336       272      

Operating lease income

 84       75       60      

Equity method income from interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC

 48       77       61      

Cardholder fees

 45       47       46      

BOLI income

 44       52       35      

Valuation adjustments on the warrant and put options associated with sale of Vantiv Holding, LLC

 31       206       67      

Banking center income

 30       34       32      

Consumer loan and lease fees

 25       27       27      

Insurance income

 13       25       28      

Gain on loan sales

 -       3       20      

Loss on OREO

 (14)       (26)       (57)      

Loss on swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. class B shares

 (38)       (31)       (45)      

Other, net

 34       54       28      

Total other noninterest income

$450       879       574      

Other noninterest expense:

Losses and adjustments

$188       221       187      

Impairment on affordable housing investments

 135       108       90      

Loan and lease

 119       158       183      

Marketing

 98       114       128      

FDIC insurance and other taxes

 89       127       114      

Professional services fees

 72       76       56      

Operating lease

 67       57       43      

Travel

 52       54       52      

Postal and courier

 47       48       48      

Data processing

 41       42       40      

Recruitment and education

 28       26       28      

OREO expense

 17       16       21      

Insurance

 16       17       18      

Supplies

 15       16       17      

Intangible asset amortization

 4       8       13      

Loss on debt extinguishment

 -       8       169      

Benefit from the reserve for unfunded commitments

 (27)       (17)       (2)      

Other, net

 178       185       169      

Total other noninterest expense

$    1,139       1,264       1,374      

The following table presents the major components of other noninterest income and other noninterest expense for the years ended December 31:

 

 

 

 

($ in millions)  2016  2015  2014   

 

Other noninterest income:

     

Income from the TRA associated with Vantiv, Inc.

  $            313   80   23  

Operating lease income

   102   89   84  

Equity method income from interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC

   66   63   48  

Valuation adjustments on the warrant associated with sale of Vantiv Holding, LLC

   64   236   31  

BOLI income

   53   48   44  

Cardholder fees

   46   43   45  

Consumer loan and lease fees

   23   23   25  

Banking center income

   20   21   30  

Gain on sale of certain retail branch operations

   19   -   -  

Private equity investment income

   11   28   27  

Insurance income

   11   14   13  

Net gains on loan sales

   10   38   -  

Gain on sale and exercise of the warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

   9   89   -  

Gain on sale of Vantiv, Inc. shares

   -   331   125  

Loss on swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B Shares

   (56  (37  (38 

Net losses on disposition and impairment of bank premises and equipment

   (13  (101  (19 

Other, net

   10   14   12  

 

Total other noninterest income

  $688   979   450  

 

Other noninterest expense:

     

Impairment on affordable housing investments

  $168   145   135  

FDIC insurance and other taxes

   126   99   89  

Loan and lease

   110   118   119  

Marketing

   104   110   98  

Operating lease

   86   74   67  

Losses and adjustments

   73   55   188  

Professional services fees

   61   70   72  

Data processing

   51   45   41  

Postal and courier

   46   45   47  

Travel

   45   54   52  

Recruitment and education

   37   33   28  

Provision for (benefit from) the reserve for unfunded commitments

   23   4   (27 

Donations

   23   29   18  

Insurance

   15   17   16  

Supplies

   14   16   15  

Other, net

   187   191   181  

 

Total other noninterest expense

  $1,169   1,105   1,139  

 

 

151164  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

26. EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

The following table provides the calculation of earnings per share and the reconciliation of earnings per share and earnings per diluted share for the years ended December 31:

The following table provides the calculation of earnings per share and the reconciliation of earnings per share and earnings per diluted share for the years ended December 31:

The following table provides the calculation of earnings per share and the reconciliation of earnings per share and earnings per diluted share for the years ended December 31:

 

 
2014 2013 2012   2016   2015   2014 
(in millions, except per share data)  Income     Average  
Shares
 Per Share
Amount
   Income     Average  
Shares
 Per Share
Amount
   Income     Average  
Shares
 Per Share
Amount
 

Earnings per share:

($ in millions, except per share data)  Income     Average 
Shares 
   Per Share 
Amount 
   Income     Average  
Shares  
   Per Share  
Amount  
   Income     Average
Shares
   Per Share  
Amount  
 

 

Earnings per Share:

                  

Net income attributable to Bancorp

$        1,481  1,836  1,576   $                1,564        1,712        1,481     

Dividends on preferred stock

 67    37    35      75        75        67     

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 1,414  1,799  1,541    1,489        1,637        1,414     

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

 12    14    10      15        15        12     

 

Net income allocated to common shareholders

$1,402  833  1.68  1,785  869  2.05  1,531  904  1.69   $1,474    757    1.95    1,622    799    2.03    1,402    833    1.68  

Earnings per diluted share:

 

Earnings per Diluted Share:

                  

Net income available to common shareholders

$1,414  1,799  1,541   $1,489        1,637        1,414     

Effect of dilutive securities:

                  

Stock-based awards

 -  10  -  8  -  6    -    7      -    9      -    10   

Series G convertible preferred stock

 -  -   18  18   35  36  

 

Net income available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

 1,414  1,817  1,576    1,489        1,637        1,414     

Less: Income allocated to participating securities

 12    14    10      15        15        12     

 

Net income allocated to common shareholders plus assumed conversions

$1,402  843  1.66  1,803  895  2.02  1,566  946  1.66   $1,474    764    1.93    1,622    808    2.01    1,402    843    1.66 

 

 

Shares are excluded from the computation of net income per diluted share when their inclusion has an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share. The diluted earnings per share computation for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012 excludes 1319 million, 2416 million and 3613 million, respectively, of SARs and an immaterial amount 1 million, and 5 million, respectively, of stock options because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

The diluted earnings per share computation for the year ended December 31, 2016 excludes the impact of the forward contract related to the December 20, 2016 accelerated share repurchase transaction. Based upon the average daily volume weighted-average price of the Bancorp’s common stock from the repurchase date through the fourth quarter of 2016, the counterparty to the transaction would have been required to deliver additional shares for the settlement of the forward contract as of December 31, 2016, and thus the impact of the forward contract related to the accelerated share repurchase transaction would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share.

The diluted earnings per share computation for the year ended December 31, 2015 excludes the impact of the forward contract related to the December 14, 2015 accelerated share repurchase

transaction. Based upon the average daily volume weighted-average price of the Bancorp’s common stock from the repurchase date through the fourth quarter of 2015, the counterparty to the transaction would have been required to deliver additional shares for the settlement of the forward contract as of December 31, 2015, and thus the impact of the forward contract related to the accelerated share repurchase transaction would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share.

The diluted earnings per share computation for the year ended December 31, 2014 excludes the impact of the forward contract related to the October 23, 2014 accelerated share repurchase transaction. Based onupon the average daily volume-weighted averagevolume weighted-average price of the Bancorp’s common stock duringfrom the repurchase date through the fourth quarter of 2014, the counterparty to the transaction would have been required to deliver additional shares for the settlement of the forward contract as of December 31, 2014, and thus the impact of the forward contract related to the accelerated share repurchase transaction would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share.

The diluted earnings per share computation for the year ended December 31, 2013 excludes the impact of the forward contracts related to the November 18, 2013 and December 13, 2013 accelerated share repurchase transactions. Based upon the average daily volume-weighted average price of the Bancorp’s common stock during the fourth quarter of 2013, the counterparty to the transactions would have been required to deliver additional shares for the settlement of the forward contracts as of December 31, 2013, and thus the impact of the two accelerated share repurchase transactions would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share.

The diluted earnings per share computation for the year ended December 31, 2012 excludes the impact of the forward contracts related to the November 6, 2012 and December 14, 2012 accelerated share repurchase transactions. Based upon the average daily volume-weighted average price of the Bancorp’s common stock during the fourth quarter of 2012, the counterparty to the transactions would have been required to deliver additional shares for the settlement of the forward contracts as of December 31, 2012, and thus the impact of the two accelerated share repurchase transactions would have been anti-dilutive to earnings per share.

 

 

152Fifth Third Bancorp

165  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

27. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Bancorp measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP also establishes a fair value

hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy

gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the instrument’s fair value measurement. For more information regarding the fair value hierarchy and how the Bancorp measures fair value, refer to Note 1.

 

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables summarize assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including residential mortgage loans held for sale for which the Bancorp has elected the fair value option as of:

 

  Fair Value Measurements Using    
December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)        Level 1(c)                  Level 2(c)                  Level 3             Total Fair Value     

Assets:

Available-for-sale and other securities:

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

$25  1,607  -   1,632 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 -   192  -   192 

Mortgage-backed securities

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 -   12,404  -   12,404 

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 -   4,565  -   4,565 

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 -   1,550  -   1,550 

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 -   1,362  -   1,362 

Equity securities(a)

 84  19  -   103 

Available-for-sale and other securities(a)

 109   21,699   -   21,808 

Trading securities:

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

 -   14  -   14 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 -   8  -   8 

Mortgage-backed securities

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 -   9  -   9 

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 -   13  -   13 

Equity securities

 316  -   -   316 

Trading securities

 316   44   -   360 

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

 -   561  -   561 

Residential mortgage loans(b)

 -   -   108  108 

Derivative assets:

Interest rate contracts

 -   888  12  900 

Foreign exchange contracts

 -   417  -   417 

Equity contracts

 -   -   415  415 

Commodity contracts

 68  280  -   348 

Derivative assets

 68  1,585  427  2,080 

Total assets

$493   23,889   535  24,917 

Liabilities:

Derivative liabilities:

Interest rate contracts

$6  276  2  284 

Foreign exchange contracts

 -   372  -   372 

Equity contracts

 -   -   49  49 

Commodity contracts

 58  280  -   338 

Derivative liabilities

 64   928   51  1,043 

Short positions

 16  5  -   21 

Total liabilities

$80  933  51  1,064 

153  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fair Value Measurements Using    

 
December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)        Level 1(c)                  Level 2(c)                  Level 3               Total Fair Value       
                      Fair Value Measurements  Using                       
December 31, 2016 ($ in millions) Level 1(c)   Level 2(c)   Level 3         Total Fair Value       

 

Assets:

      

Available-for-sale and other securities:

      

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

$26  1,644  -   1,670 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 -   192  -   192 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

 $            471               78     -    549   

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  -               45     -    45   

Mortgage-backed securities:

      

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 -   12,284  -   12,284   -               15,608     -    15,608   

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

  -               9,055     -    9,055   

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

 -   1,395  -   1,395   -               3,112     -    3,112   

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 -   2,187  -   2,187   -               2,116     -    2,116   

Equity securities(a)

 89  29  -   118   90               1     -    91   

 

Available-for-sale and other securities(a)

 115   17,731   -   17,846   561               30,015     -    30,576   

Trading securities:

      

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

 1  4  -   5 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 -   12  1  13 

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  -               23     -    23   

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

  -               39     -    39   

Mortgage-backed securities:

      

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

 -   3  -   3   -               8     -      

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

 -   7  -   7   -               15     -    15   

Equity securities

 315  -   -   315   325               -     -    325   

 

Trading securities

 316   26   1  343   325               85     -    410   

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

 -   890  -   890   -               686     -    686   

Residential mortgage loans(b)

 -   -   92  92   -               -     143    143   

Derivative assets:

      

Interest rate contracts

 13  802  12  827   20               715     13    748   

Foreign exchange contracts

 -   276  -   276   -               202     -    202   

Equity contracts

 -   -   384  384 

Commodity contracts

 18  48  -   66   22               85     -    107   

Derivative assets

 31  1,126  396  1,553 

 

Derivative assets(d)

  42               1,002     13    1,057   

 

Total assets

$462   19,773   489  20,724  $928               31,788     156    32,872   

 

Liabilities:

      

Derivative liabilities:

      

Interest rate contracts

$1  384  4  389  $3               257     5    265   

Foreign exchange contracts

 -   252  -   252   -               204     -    204   

Equity contracts

 -   -   48  48   -               -     91    91   

Commodity contracts

 9  56  -   65   27               79     -    106   

Derivative liabilities

 10   692   52  754 

 

Short positions

 4  4  -   8 

Derivative liabilities(e)

  30               540     96    666   

Short positions(e)

  17               4     -    21   

 

Total liabilities

$14  696  52  762  $47               544     96    687   

 
(a)

Excludes FHLB, FRB and FRBDTCC restricted stock totaling$248,$358and$3521, respectively, atDecember 31, 20142016 and $402 and $349, respectively, at December 31, 2013..

(b)

Includes residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale and subsequently transferred to held for investment.

(c)

During the yearsyear endedDecember 31, 2014 and 2013,2016, no assets or liabilities were transferred between Level 1 and Level 2.

(d)

Included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(e)

Included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

166  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 
   Fair Value Measurements Using     
December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)  Level 1(c)     Level 2(c)     Level 3   Total Fair Value     

 

 

Assets:

            

Available-for-sale and other securities:

            

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

  $                100      1,087      -    1,187  

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

   -      52      -    52  

Mortgage-backed securities:

            

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

   -      15,081      -    15,081  

Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   -      7,862      -    7,862  

Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities

   -      2,804      -    2,804  

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   -      1,355      -    1,355  

Equity securities(a)

   98      1      -    99  

 

 

Available-for-sale and other securities(a)

   198      28,242      -    28,440  

Trading securities:

            

U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

   -      19      -    19  

Obligations of states and political subdivisions securities

   -      9      -     

Mortgage-backed securities:

            

Agency residential mortgage-backed securities

   -      6      -     

Asset-backed securities and other debt securities

   -      19      -    19  

Equity securities

   333      -      -    333  

 

 

Trading securities

   333      53      -    386  

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

   -      519      -    519  

Residential mortgage loans(b)

   -      -      167    167  

Derivative assets:

            

Interest rate contracts

   3      892      15    910  

Foreign exchange contracts

   -      386      -    386  

Equity contracts

   -      -      262    262  

Commodity contracts

   54      240      -    294  

 

 

Derivative assets(d)

   57      1,518      277    1,852  

 

 

Total assets

  $588      30,332      444    31,364  

 

 

Liabilities:

            

Derivative liabilities:

            

Interest rate contracts

  $1      257      3    261  

Foreign exchange contracts

   -      340      -    340  

Equity contracts

   -      -      61    61  

Commodity contracts

   37      239      -    276  

 

 

Derivative liabilities(e)

   38      836      64    938  

Short positions(e)

   22      7      -    29  

 

 

Total liabilities

  $60      843      64    967  

 

 
(a)

Excludes FHLB, FRB and DTCC restricted stock totaling $248, $355 and $1, respectively, at December 31, 2015.

(b)

Includes residential mortgage loans originated as held for sale and subsequently transferred to held for investment.

(c)

During the year ended December 31, 2015, no assets or liabilities were transferred between Level 1 and Level 2.

(d)

Included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(e)

Included in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for significant instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Available-for-sale and other securities and trading securities

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include government bondsU.S. Treasury securities and exchange tradedexchange-traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or DCFs. Examples of such instruments, which are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy,securities include federal agencies securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions securities, agency residential mortgage-backed securities, agency andnon-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities, and asset-backed securities and other debt securities. Corporate bonds are included in asset-backed securities and other debt securities in the previous table. Federal agencies, obligations of states and political subdivisions,

agency residential mortgage-backed securities, agency and non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities and other debtequity securities. These securities are generally valued using a market approach based on observable prices of securities with similar characteristics.

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

For residential mortgage loans held for sale for which the fair value election has been made, fair value is estimated based upon mortgage-backed securities prices and spreads to those prices or, for certain ARM loans, DCF models that may incorporate the anticipated portfolio composition, credit spreads of asset-backed securities with similar collateral and market conditions. The anticipated portfolio composition includes the effect of interest rate spreads and discount rates due to loan characteristics such as the state in which the loan was originated, the loan amount and the ARM margin. Residential mortgage loans held for sale that are valued based on mortgage-backed securities prices are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy as the valuation is based on

154Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

external pricing for similar instruments. ARM loans classified as held for sale are also classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy due to the use of observable inputs in the DCF model. These observable inputs include interest rate spreads from agency mortgage-backed securities market rates and observable discount rates.

167  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Residential mortgage loans

Residential mortgage loans held for sale that are reclassified to held for investment are transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. It is the Bancorp’s policy to value any transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy based on end of period fair values.

For residential mortgage loans for which the fair value election has been made, and that are reclassified from held for sale to held for investment, the fair value estimation is based on mortgage-backed securities prices, interest rate risk and an internally developed credit component. Therefore, these loans are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. An adverse change in the loss rate or severity assumption would result in a decrease in fair value of the related loan. The Secondary Marketing Department,department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Operating Officer,Head of the Consumer Bank, in conjunction with the Consumer Credit Risk Department,department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for residential mortgage loans held for investment. The Secondary Marketing Departmentdepartment reviews loss severity assumptions quarterly to determine if adjustments are necessary based on decreases in observable housing market data. This group also reviews trades in comparable benchmark securities and adjusts the values of loans as necessary. Consumer Credit Risk is responsible for the credit component of the fair value which is based on internally developed loss rate models that take into account historical loss rates and loss severities based on underlying collateral values.

Derivatives

Exchange-traded derivatives valued using quoted prices and certainover-the-counter derivatives valued using active bids are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Most of the Bancorp’s derivative contracts are valued using DCF or other models that incorporate current market interest rates, credit spreads assigned to the derivative counterparties and other market parameters and, therefore, are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such derivatives include basic and structured interest rate, foreign exchange and commodity swaps and options. Derivatives that are valued based upon models with significant unobservable market parameters are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. AtDuring the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, derivatives classified as Level 3, which are valued using models containing unobservable inputs, consisted primarily of a warrant associated with the initial sale of the Bancorp’s 51% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC to Advent International and a total return swap associated with the Bancorp’s sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares.Shares. Level 3 derivatives also include IRLCs, which utilize internally generated loan closing rate assumptions as a significant unobservable input in the valuation process.

The warrant allowsDuring the fourth quarter of 2016, the Bancorp exercised its right to purchase approximately 207.8 million incremental nonvoting unitsClass C Units underlying the warrant at the $15.98 strike price. This exercise was settled on a net basis for approximately 5.7 million Class C Units, which were then exchanged for approximately 5.7 million shares of Vantiv, Inc. Class A Common Stock of which 4.8 million shares were sold in a secondary offering and 0.9 million shares were repurchased by Vantiv, Holding, LLC at an exercise price of $15.98 per unit and requires settlement under certain defined conditions involving change of control. TheInc. For further information on the warrant transaction, refer to Note 19.

Prior to the aforementioned warrant transaction, the fair value of the warrant iswas calculated in conjunction with a third party valuation provider by applying Black-Scholes option valuationoption-pricing models

models using probability weighted scenarios which containcontained the following inputs: Vantiv, Inc. stock price, strike price per the Warrant Agreement and several unobservable inputs, such as expected term expected volatility, and expected dividend rate.volatility.

For the warrant, an increase in the expected term (years) and the expected volatility assumptions would result in an increase in the fair value; conversely, a decrease in these assumptions would result in a decrease in the fair value. The Accounting and Treasury Departments,departments, both of which report to the Bancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, determined the valuation methodology for the warrant. Accounting and Treasury reviewreviewed changes in fair value on a quarterly basis for reasonableness based on changes in historical and implied volatilities, expected terms, probability weightings of the related scenarios and other assumptions.

Under the terms of the total return swap, the Bancorp will make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate of the Visa, Inc. Class B sharesShares into Class A shares.Shares. Additionally, the Bancorp will make a quarterly payment based on Visa’s stock price and the conversion rate of the Visa, Inc. Class B sharesShares into Class A sharesShares until the date on which the Covered Litigation is settled. The fair value of the total return swap was calculated using a DCF model based on unobservable inputs consisting of management’s estimate of the probability of certain litigation scenarios, the timing of the resolution of the Covered Litigation and Visa litigation loss estimates in excess, or shortfall, of the Bancorp’s proportional share of escrow funds.

An increase in the loss estimate or a delay in the resolution of the Covered Litigation would result in an increase in fair value; conversely, a decrease in the loss estimate or an acceleration of the resolution of the Covered Litigation would result in a decrease in fair value. The Accounting and Treasury Departmentsdepartments determined the valuation methodology for the total return swap. Accounting and Treasury review the changes in fair value on a quarterly basis for reasonableness based on Visa stock price changes, litigation contingencies, and escrow funding.

The net fair value asset of the IRLCs at December 31, 20142016 was $12 million. Immediate decreases in current interest rates of 25 bps and 50 bps would result in increases in the fair value of the IRLCs of approximately $5$6 million and $9$11 million, respectively. Immediate increases of current interest rates of 25 bps and 50 bps would result in decreases in the fair value of the IRLCs of approximately $5$6 million and $11$13 million, respectively. The decrease in fair value of IRLCs due to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in the assumed loan closing rates would be approximately $1 million and $2 million, respectively, and the increase in fair value due to immediate 10% and 20% favorable changes in the assumed loan closing rates would be approximately $1 million and $2 million, respectively. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution, as changes in fair value based on a variation in assumptions typically cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear.

The Secondary Marketing Department and the Consumer Line of Business Finance Department,department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, and the aforementioned Secondary Marketing department are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for IRLCs. Secondary Marketing, in conjunction with a third party valuation provider, periodically review loan closing rate assumptions and recent loan sales to determine if adjustments are needed for current market conditions not reflected in historical data.

 

 

155168  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following tables are a reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 
 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
  

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

($ in millions)

Trading
    Securities    
 Residential
Mortgage
Loans
 Interest Rate
Derivatives,
Net(a)
 Equity
Derivatives,
Net(a)
 Total
Fair Value
 

 

 

Beginning balance

$  92     336  $437  

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):

Included in earnings

     125   (7)   122  

Purchases

     (1)     (1)  

Sales

 (1)         (1)  

Settlements

   (17)   (122)   37   (102)  

Transfers into Level 3(b)

   29       29  

 

 

Ending balance

$  108   10   366  $484  

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at December 31, 2014(c)

$    13   (7)  $10  

 

 
           

 

 
 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
  

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

($ in millions)

Trading
Securities
 Residential
Mortgage
Loans
 Interest Rate
Derivatives,
Net(a)
 Equity
Derivatives,
Net(a)
 Total
Fair Value
 

 

 

Beginning balance

$  76   57   144  $278  

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):

Included in earnings

    (1)   59   175   233  

Purchases

       (2)      (2)  

Settlements

    (17)   (106)   17   (106)  

Transfers into Level 3(b)

    34         34  

 

 

Ending balance

$  92     336  $437  

 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at December 31, 2013(c)

$   (1)   11   175  $185  

 

 
   

 

 
 Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
  

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2012

($ in millions)

Trading
Securities
 Residential
Mortgage
Loans
 Interest Rate
Derivatives,
Net(a)
 Equity
Derivatives,
Net(a)
 Total
Fair Value
 

Beginning balance

$  65   32   32  $130  

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):

Included in earnings

       418   22   440  

Settlements

    (15)   (393)   90  (318)  

Transfers into Level 3(b)

    26         26  

 

 

Ending balance

$  76   57   144  $278  

 

 

The amount of total gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at December 31, 2012(c)

$      233   22  $255  

 

 

 

   Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
  

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)     Trading 
Securities 
  Residential      
Mortgage        
Loans           
  Interest Rate     
Derivatives,      
Net(a)           
  Equity           
Derivatives,       
Net(a)           
  Total      
Fair Value  

 

Balance, beginning of period

  $    -  167   12   201   380 

Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized):

           

Included in earnings

   -  (2)  115   17   130 

Purchases

   -    (3)    (3)

Sale and exercise of warrant

   -      (334)  (334)

Settlements

   -  (40)  (116)  25   (131)

Transfers into Level 3(b)

   -  18       18 

 

Balance, end of period

  $    -  143     (91)  60 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to instruments still held at December 31, 2016(c)

  $    -  (2)  13   (56)  (45)

 

(a)     Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of$13and$5, respectively, as ofDecember 31, 2016. Net equity derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of$0 and$91, respectively, as ofDecember 31, 2016.

(b)     Includes certain residential mortgage loans held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c)     Includes interest income and expense.

 

 

   Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
  

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)     Trading 
Securities 
  Residential      
Mortgage        
Loans           
  Interest Rate     
Derivatives,      
Net(a)            
  Equity           
Derivatives,       
Net(a)           
  Total      
Fair Value  

 

Balance, beginning of period

  $    -  108   10   366   484 

Total gains (realized/unrealized):

           

Included in earnings

   -    111   288   399 

Purchases

   -    (2)    (2)

Sale and exercise of warrant

   -      (477)  (477)

Settlements

   -  (28)  (107)  24   (111)

Transfers into Level 3(b)

   -  87       87 

 

Balance, end of period

  $    -  167   12   201   380 

 

The amount of total gains for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to instruments still held at December 31, 2015(c)

  $    -    17   66   83 

 

(a)     Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of $15 and $3, respectively, as of December 31, 2015. Net equity derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of $262 and $61, respectively, as of December 31, 2015.

(b)     Includes certain residential mortgage loans held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c)     Includes interest income and expense.

 

 

      Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)    
  

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)     Trading  
Securities  
  Residential      
Mortgage        
Loans           
  Interest Rate     
Derivatives,      
Net(a)            
  Equity           
Derivatives,       
Net(a)           
  Total      
Fair Value  

 

Balance, beginning of period

  $    1    92     336   437 

Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized):

           

Included in earnings

   -      125   (7)  122 

Purchases

   -      (1)    (1)

Sales

   (1)         (1)

Settlements

   -    (17)  (122)  37   (102)

Transfers into Level 3(b)

   -    29       29 

 

Balance, end of period

  $    -    108   10   366   484 

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to instruments still held at December 31, 2014(c)

  $    -      13   (7)  10 

 

(a)

Net interest rate derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of$12and$2, respectively, as ofDecember 31, 2014, $12 and $4,$2, respectively, as of December 31, 2013 and $60 and $3, respectively, as of December 31, 2012.2014. Net equity derivatives include derivative assets and liabilities of$415 $415 and$49, respectively, as ofDecember 31, 2014, $384 and $48, $49, respectively, as of December 31, 2013, and $177 and $33, respectively, as of December 31, 2012.2014.

(b)

Includes certain residential mortgage loans held for sale that were transferred to held for investment.

(c)

Includes interest income and expense.

 

156169  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The total gains and losses included in earnings for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 as follows:

 

($ in millions)    2014 2013   2012      

Mortgage banking net revenue

$127      57      418     

Corporate banking revenue

 2      1      1     

Other noninterest income

 (7)      175      21     

 

Total gains

$              122          233      440     

The total gains and losses included in earnings attributable to changes in unrealized gains and losses related to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

 
($ in millions)    2014 2013   2012        2016             2015               2014         

 

Mortgage banking net revenue

$16      10      233       $112  110    127         

Corporate banking revenue

 1      -      1        1  1    2         

Other noninterest income

 (7)      175      21        17  288    (7)        

 

Total gains

$                10          185      255       $            130  399    122         

 

The total gains and losses included in earnings attributable to changes in unrealized gains and losses related to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

The total gains and losses included in earnings attributable to changes in unrealized gains and losses related to Level 3 assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

 

 
($ in millions)  2016             2015             2014         

 

Mortgage banking net revenue

  $10  16    16         

Corporate banking revenue

   1  1    1         

Other noninterest income

   (56 66    (7)        

 

Total (losses) gains

  $               (45 83    10         

 

The following tables present information as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 about significant unobservable inputs related to the Bancorp’s material categories of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)

As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)                

Financial Instrument  Fair ValueValuation Technique

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

Ranges of
Inputs
Weighted-Average     Fair Value   Valuation Technique          Significant Unobservable
        Inputs
  

Ranges of

Inputs

  

Weighted-      

Average      

Residential mortgage loans

$ 108Loss rate modelInterest rate risk factor(7.2) - 17.7%5.0%  $143       Loss rate model  Interest rate risk factor  (11.5) - 13.8%  2.3%
  Credit risk factor0 - 46.6%1.8%      Credit risk factor  0 - 75.6%  1.4%

IRLCs, net

   12Discounted cash flowLoan closing rates8.8 - 86.7%65.2%   12        Discounted cash flow  Loan closing rates  23.8 - 99.5%  76.8%

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc.

Class B Shares

   (91)      Discounted cash flow  

Timing of the resolution of the Covered Litigation

  

12/31/2018 -

12/31/2022

  NM

          

As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)

          

Financial Instrument     Fair Value   Valuation Technique          Significant Unobservable
        Inputs
  

Ranges of

Inputs

  

Weighted-      

Average      

Residential mortgage loans

  $167      Loss rate model  Interest rate risk factor  (9.2) - 16.5%  3.1%
      Credit risk factor  0 - 80.5%  1.3%

IRLCs, net

   15       Discounted cash flow  Loan closing rates  5.8 - 94.0%  76.3%

Stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

   415Black-Scholes option valuation model

Expected term (years)

Expected volatility(a)

2.0 - 14.5

22.9 - 32.2%

6.0

26.5%

   262      Black-Scholes option- pricing model  Expected term (years) Expected volatility(a)  

2.0 - 13.5

22.6 - 31.2%

  

5.9

25.9%

  Expected dividend rate--

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares

   (49)Discounted cash flow

Timing of the resolution of the Covered Litigation

12/31/2015 -

6/30/2020

NM

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc.

Class B Shares

   (61)      Discounted cash flow  

Timing of the resolution of the Covered Litigation

  

12/31/2016 -

3/31/2021

  NM
     

As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)
Financial Instrument  Fair ValueValuation Technique

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

Ranges of
Inputs
Weighted-Average

Residential mortgage loans

$ 92Loss rate modelInterest rate risk factor(23.7) - 16.5%2.3%
  Credit risk factor0 - 63.4%2.6%

IRLCs, net

   11Discounted cash flowLoan closing rates14.9 - 98.7%68.5%

Stock warrant associated with Vantiv Holding, LLC

   384Black-Scholes option valuation model

Expected term (years)

Expected volatility(a)

2.0 - 15.5

18.5 - 33.2%

5.1

25.4%

  Expected dividend rate--

Swap associated with the sale of Visa, Inc. Class B shares

   (48)Discounted cash flow

Timing of the resolution of the Covered Litigation

12/31/2014 -

12/31/2019

NM
(a)

Based on historical and implied volatilities of Vantiv, Inc. and comparable companies assuming similar expected terms.

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets and liabilities are not measured at

fair value on an ongoing basis; however, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment.

 

 

157170  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following tables provide the fair value hierarchy and carrying amount of all assets that were held as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015 and for which a nonrecurring fair value adjustment was recorded during the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, and the related gains and losses from fair value adjustments on assets sold during the period as well as assets still held as of the end of the period.

 

 

 
  Fair Value Measurements Using       Total Losses         
  

 

     
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)     Level 1Level 2       Level 3     Total 2014         

 

 

Commercial loans held for sale(a)

$        -     -       33      33  (12)      

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

-     -       554      554  (87)      

Commercial and industrial loans

-     -       456      456  (382)      

Commercial mortgage loans

-     -       110      110  (36)      

Commercial construction loans

-     -       23      23  (1)      

MSRs

-     -       856      856  (65)      

OREO

-     -       90      90  (26)      

Bank premises

 22      22  (20)      

 

 

Total

$-     -       2,144      2,144  (629)      

 

 
           

 

 
  Fair Value Measurements Using   Total Losses         
  

 

     
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)     Level 1      Level 2       Level 3     Total 2013         

 

 

Commercial loans held for sale(a)

$-     -       3      3  (7)      

Commercial and industrial loans

-     -       443      443  (281)      

Commercial mortgage loans

-     -       61      61  (41)      

Commercial construction loans

-     -       16      16  (10)      

MSRs

-     -       967      967          192      

OREO

-     -       87      87  (45)      

Bank premises

-     -       8      8  (6)      

Private equity investment funds

-     -       181      181  (4)      

 

 

Total

$-     -       1,766            1,766  (202)      

 

 
(a)

Includes commercial nonaccrual loans held for sale.

 

 
                 Fair Value Measurements Using                                     Total (Losses) Gains                      
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)          Level 1         Level 2         Level 3        Total          For the year ended December 31,    
2016
     

 

 

Commercial loans held for sale

 $   -        -        5   5     (32)   

Commercial and industrial loans

   -        -        412   412     (166)   

Commercial mortgage loans

   -        -        15   15     (4)   

Commercial construction loans

   -        -        -   -        

Commercial leases

   -        -        3   3     (3)   

MSRs

   -        -        744   744        

OREO

   -        -        42   42     (17)   

Bank premises and equipment

   -        -        28   28     (31)   

Operating lease equipment

   -        -        37   37     (9)   

Private equity investments

   -        -        60   60     (9)   

 

 

Total

 $   -        -        1,346   1,346     (262)   

 

 
              

 

 
                 Fair Value Measurements Using                                     Total (Losses) Gains                      
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)          Level 1         Level 2         Level 3        Total      For the year ended December 31, 2015     

 

 

Commercial loans held for sale

 $   -      -        13   13        

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

   -      -        68   68     (2)   

Automobile loans held for sale

   -      -        2   2        

Credit cards held for sale

   -      -        4   4     (2)   

Commercial and industrial loans

   -      -        344   344     (137)   

Commercial mortgage loans

   -      -        103   103     (41)   

Commercial construction loans

   -      -        6   6     (5)   

Residential mortgage loans

   -      -        55   55     (1)   

MSRs

   -      -        784   784        

OREO

   -      -        58   58     (24)   

Bank premises and equipment

   -      -        83   83     (101)   

Operating lease equipment

   -      -        42   42     (33)   

Private equity investments

       13   13     (1)   

 

 

Total

 $   -      -        1,575   1,575     (340)   

 

 

The following tables present information as of December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 about significant unobservable inputs related to the Bancorp’s material categories of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis:

 

 

 
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions) 

 

 
Financial InstrumentFair Value Valuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable
Inputs
Ranges of
Inputs
 Weighted-Average 

 

 

Commercial loans held for sale

$ 33               Appraised valueAppraised value NM   NM  
Cost to sell NM   10.0%  

 

 

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

 554             Comparable transactionsEstimated sales proceeds from comparable transactions NM   15.0%  

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 456             Appraised valueCollateral value NM   NM  

 

 

Commercial mortgage loans

 110             Appraised valueCollateral value NM   NM  

 

 

Commercial construction loans

 23               Appraised valueCollateral value NM   NM  

 

 

MSRs

 856             Discounted cash flowPrepayment speed 0 - 100%   

 

(Fixed) 12.0%

(Adjustable) 26.2%

  

  

Discount rates 9.6 - 13.2%   

 

(Fixed) 9.9%

(Adjustable) 11.8%

  

  

 

 

OREO

 90               Appraised valueAppraised value NM   NM  

 

 

Bank Premises

 22               Appraised valueAppraised value NM   NM  

 

 

 

 
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)             

 

 
Financial Instrument  Fair Value  Valuation Technique  Significant Unobservable Inputs 

 

Ranges of
Inputs

   Weighted-Average 

 

 

Commercial loans held for sale

  $          5            Appraised value  Appraised value  NM    NM 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

  412  Appraised value  Collateral value  NM    NM 

 

 

Commercial mortgage loans

  15  Appraised value  Collateral value  NM    NM 

 

 

Commercial construction loans

  -  Appraised value  Collateral value  NM    NM 

 

 

Commercial leases

  3  Appraised value  Appraised value  NM    NM 

 

 

MSRs

  744  Discounted cash flow  Prepayment speed  0.7 - 100%    

(Fixed) 10.2%

(Adjustable) 25.3%

 

 

      OAS spread (bps)  100 - 1,515   

 

 

 

(Fixed) 654

(Adjustable) 738

 

 

 

 

 

OREO

  42  Appraised value  Appraised value  NM    NM 

 

 

Bank premises and equipment

  28  Appraised value  Appraised value  NM    NM 

 

 

Operating lease equipment

  37  Appraised value  Appraised value  NM    NM 

 

 

Private equity investments

  60  Liquidity discount applied
to fund’s net asset value
  Liquidity discount  5.0 - 37.5%    12.8% 

 

 

 

158171  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)

Financial InstrumentFair ValueValuation Technique

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

Ranges of
Inputs
Weighted-Average

Commercial loans held for sale

$ 3            Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM
Cost to sellNM10.0%

Commercial and industrial loans

   443            Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

Commercial mortgage loans

   61            Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

Commercial construction loans

   16            Appraised valueCollateral valueNMNM

MSRs

   967            Discounted cash flowPrepayment speed0 - 100%

(Fixed) 10.3%

(Adjustable) 25.6%


Discount rates9.4 - 18.0%

(Fixed) 10.4%

(Adjustable) 11.6%


OREO

   87            Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM

Bank premises

   8            Appraised valueAppraised valueNMNM

Private equity investment funds

   44(a)Liquidity discount applied to fund’s net asset valueLiquidity discount0-18.0%3.0%

(a)

Includes funds the Bancorp will be prohibited from retaining after the July 21, 2016 end of the conformance period for the final rules, adopted under the BHCA, that implemented the provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, commonly referred to as the Volcker Rule.

 

 
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions) 

 

 

Financial Instrument

        Fair Value  Valuation Technique  

 

Significant Unobservable

Inputs

  

Ranges of

Inputs

   

Weighted-Average

 

 

 

Commercial loans held for sale

    $   13  Discounted cash flow  Discount spread   NM    4.4% 

 

 

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

      68  Loss rate model  Interest rate risk factor   (7.5) - 0.1%    (1.6%
          Credit risk factor   NM    0.1% 

 

 

Automobile loans held for sale

      2  Discounted cash flow  Discount spread   NM    3.1% 

 

 

Credit cards held for sale

      4  Comparable transactions  

Estimated sales proceeds from

comparable transactions

   NM    NM 

 

 

Commercial and industrial loans

      344  Appraised value  Collateral value   NM    NM 

 

 

Commercial mortgage loans

      103  Appraised value  Collateral value   NM    NM 

 

 

Commercial construction loans

      6  Appraised value  Collateral value   NM    NM 

 

 

Residential mortgage loans

      55  Appraised value  Appraised value   NM    NM 

 

 

MSRs

      784  Discounted cash flow  Prepayment speed   1.0 - 100%   

 

 

 

(Fixed) 11.8%

(Adjustable) 27.0%

 

 

 

          OAS spread (bps)   364 - 1,515   

 

 

 

(Fixed) 618

(Adjustable) 703

 

 

 

 

 

OREO

      58  Appraised value  Appraised value   NM    NM 

 

 

Bank premises and equipment

      83  Appraised value  Appraised value   NM    NM 

 

 

Operating lease equipment

      42  Appraised value  Appraised value   NM    NM 

 

 

Private equity investments

      13  

Liquidity discount applied

to fund’s net asset value

  Liquidity discount   NM    18.0% 

 

 

 

Commercial loans held for sale

During 2014the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp transferred $28$140 million and $5$37 million, respectively, of commercial loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at the lower of cost or fair value. These loans had fair value adjustments in 2014during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 20132015 totaling $10$30 million and $4$1 million, respectively, and were generally based on either appraisals of the underlying collateral or were estimated by discounting future cash flows using the current market rates of loans to borrowers with similar credit characteristics, similar remaining maturities, prepayment speeds and loss severities and were, therefore, classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Additionally, during 2014the years ended December 31, 2016 and 20132015 there were fair value adjustments on existing commercial loans held for sale of $2 million and $3$1 million, respectively. The fair value adjustments were also based on appraisals of the underlying collateralcollateral. The Bancorp recognized an immaterial amount of net gains on the sale of certain commercial loans held for sale during the year ended December 31, 2016 and were therefore classified within Level 3$5 million in gains on the sale of certain commercial loans held for sale during the valuation hierarchy. An adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement.year ended December 31, 2015.

The Accounting Departmentdepartment determines the procedures for the valuation of commercial HFS loans held for sale using appraised value which may include a comparison to recently executed transactions of similar type loans. A monthly review of the portfolio is performed for reasonableness. Quarterly, appraisals approaching a year old are updated and the Real Estate Valuation group, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, in conjunction with the Commercial Line of Business reviewreviews the third party appraisals for reasonableness. Additionally, the Commercial Line of Business Finance Department,department, which reports to the BancorpBancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, in conjunction with the Accounting reviewdepartment reviews all loan appraisal values, carryingcarry values and vintages. The Treasury department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for the estimate of fair value adjustments when a discounted future cash flow valuation technique is employed.

Residential mortgage loans held for sale

During 2014,the year ended December 31, 2016, the Bancorp did not transfer any residential mortgage loans from the portfolio to loans held for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Bancorp transferred $720$233 million of restructured residential mortgage loans

from the portfolio to loans held for sale that upon transfer were measured at the lower of cost or fair value using significant unobservable inputs. Fair values were estimated based on mortgage-backed securities prices, interest rate risk and an internally developed credit component. These loans had $2 million of fair value adjustments during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Secondary Marketing department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Head of the Consumer Bank, in 2014 totaling $87 million.conjunction with the Consumer Credit Risk department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, is responsible for determining the valuation methodology for residential mortgage loans held for investment. The fair valueSecondary Marketing department reviews loss severity assumptions quarterly to determine if adjustments wereare necessary based on estimated third-party valuations utilizing recent sales data from similar transactions. Broker opinion statements weredecreases in observable housing market data. This group also obtainedreviews trades in comparable benchmark securities and adjusts the values of loans as additional evidence to supportnecessary. Consumer Credit Risk is responsible for the third-party valuations. The Treasury Department worked with the third-party advisor to estimatecredit component of the fair value adjustments. The discounts taken were intended to represent the perspective of a market participant, considering among other things, required investor returns which include liquidity discounts reflected in similar bulk transactions. An adverse change in the fair value of theis based on internally developed loss rate models that take into account historical loss rates and loss severities based on underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement.values.

Commercial loans held for investment

During 2014the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp recorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain commercial and industrial loans, commercial mortgage andloans, commercial construction loans and commercial leases held for investment. Larger commercial loans included within aggregate borrower relationship balances exceeding $1 million that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review for impairment. The Bancorp considers the current value of collateral, credit quality of any guarantees, the guarantor’s liquidity and willingness to cooperate, the loan structure and other factors when evaluating whether an individual loan is impaired. When the loan is collateral dependent, the fair value of the loan is generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan and therefore these loans wereare classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. In cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized.

An adverse change in the fair value of the underlying collateral would result in a decrease in the fair value measurement. The fair values and recognized impairment losses are reflected in the previous table.tables. Commercial Credit Risk, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for commercial loans held for investment.

172  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Residential mortgage loans

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Bancorp transferred approximately $55 million of restructured residential mortgage loans from held for sale to the portfolio as the Bancorp no longer had the intent to sell the loans. Upon transfer, the Bancorp recognized a nonrecurring fair value adjustment of $1 million on these loans, which had previously been transferred to held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2014.

MSRs

Mortgage interest rates decreasedincreased during both the yearyears ended December 31, 20142016 and 2015 and the Bancorp recognized a recovery of temporary impairment in certain classes of the MSR portfolio and the carrying value was adjusted to the fair value. The Bancorp recognized a recovery of temporary impairment on servicing rights during the year ended December 31, 2013. MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of MSRs do occur, the precise terms and conditions typically are not readily available. Accordingly, the Bancorp estimates the fair value of MSRs using internal DCFOAS models with certain unobservable inputs, primarily prepayment speed assumptions, discount ratesOAS and weighted averageweighted-average lives, resulting in a classification within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Refer to Note 1112 for further information on the assumptions used in the valuation of the Bancorp’s MSRs. The Secondary Marketing Departmentdepartment and Treasury Departmentdepartment are responsible for determining the valuation methodology for MSRs. Representatives from Secondary Marketing, Treasury, Accounting and Risk Management are responsible for reviewing key assumptions used in the internal DCFOAS model. Two external

159  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

valuations of the MSR portfolio are obtained from third parties that use valuation models in order to assess the reasonableness of the internal DCFOAS model. Additionally, the Bancorp participates in peer surveys that provide additional confirmation of the reasonableness of key assumptions utilized in the MSR valuation process and the resulting MSR prices.

OREO

During 2014the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2013,2015, the Bancorp recorded nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as OREO and measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value. These nonrecurring losses arewere primarily due to declines in real estate values of the properties recorded in OREO. For the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, these losses include $12$8 million and $19$14 million, respectively, recorded as charge-offs, on new OREO properties transferred from loans during the respective periods and $14$9 million and $26$10 million, respectively, recorded as negative fair value adjustments on OREO in other noninterest incomeexpense in the Consolidated Statements of Income subsequent to their transfer from loans. As discussed in the following paragraphs, the fair value amounts are generally based on appraisals of the property values, resulting in a classification within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized. The previous tables reflect the fair value measurements of the properties before deducting the estimated costs to sell.

The Real Estate Valuation department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Risk Officer, is solely responsible for managing the appraisal process and evaluating the appraisal for all commercial properties transferred to OREO. All appraisals on commercial OREO properties are updated on at least an annual basis.

The Real Estate Valuation department reviews the BPO data and internal market information to determine the initialcharge-off on residential real estate loans transferred to OREO. Once the foreclosure process is completed, the Bancorp performs an interior inspection to update the initial fair value of the property. These properties are reviewed at least every 30 days after the initial

interior inspections are completed. The Asset Manager receives a monthly status report for each property which includes the number of showings, recently sold properties, current comparable listings and overall market conditions.

Bank Premisespremises and equipment

The Bancorp monitors consumer preferences for banking interactions and related customer behavior patternsperforms assessments of the recoverability of long-lived assets when events or changes in an effort to ensurecircumstances indicate that its retail distribution network is both responsive to such trends and efficient. As part of this ongoing assessment, the Bancorp determined that certain components of its Bank Premises would no longertheir carrying values may not be held for or used for their intended purposes and therefore theserecoverable. These properties wereare written down to their lower of cost or market value.values. At least annually thereafter, the Bancorp will review these properties for market fluctuations. The fair value amounts wereare generally based on appraisals of the property values, resulting in a classification within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Corporate Facilities, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Administrative Officer, in conjunction with Accounting, are responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for bank premises. For further information on bank premises and equipment and discussion on changes to the branch network, refer to Note 7.

Private equity investment fundsOperating lease equipment

The Volcker Rule, was approved byDuring the respective federal agencies onyears ended December 10, 201331, 2016 and prohibits2015, the Bancorp from retainingrecorded nonrecurring impairment adjustments to certain operating lease equipment. When evaluating whether an interest in certain of its private equity fund investments. Therefore, whileindividual asset is impaired, the Bancorp has not approved a formal plan to sell anyconsiders the current fair value of the private equity funds,asset, the changes in overall market demand for the asset and the rate of change in advancements associated with technological improvements that impact the demand for the specific asset under review. As part of this ongoing assessment, the Bancorp has determined that it may be forced to sellthe carrying values of certain of these funds prior to their scheduled redemption dates to comply with the Volcker Rule conformance period. Asoperating lease equipment were not recoverable and as a result, the Bancorp hasrecorded an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeded the fair value. The fair value amounts were generally based on appraised values of the assets, resulting in a classification within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Bancorp recorded net losses of $9 million and $33 million, respectively, as a reduction to corporate banking revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Commercial Leasing department, which reports to the Bancorp’s Chief Operating Officer, is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates for operating lease equipment. Refer to Note 8 for further information on impairment charges related to certain operating lease equipment.

Private equity investments

In December 2013, the U.S. banking agencies issued final rules to implement section 619 of the DFA, known as the Volcker Rule, which places limitations on banking organizations’ ability to own, sponsor or have certain relationships with certain private equity funds. The Bancorp recognized $9 million and $1 million of OTTI primarily associated with certain nonconforming investments affected by the Volcker Rule during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Bancorp performed nonrecurring fair value measurements on a fund by fund basis to determine whether OTTI exists.existed. The Bancorp estimated the fair value of a fund by using the net asset value reported by the fund manager, and in some cases, applying an estimated market discount to the reported net asset value of the fund. Because the length of time until the investment will become redeemable is generally not certain, these funds were classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The Bancorp recognized $4 million of OTTI on its investments in private equity funds during 2013. The Bancorp recognized no OTTI on its investments in private equity funds during 2014. An adverse change in the reported net asset values or estimated market discounts, where applicable, would result in a decrease in the fair value estimate. In cases where the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized. The Bancorp’s private equityPrivate Equity department, which reports to the Chief OperatingStrategy Officer, in conjunction with Accounting, is responsible for preparing and reviewing the fair value estimates.

173  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fair Value Option

The Bancorp elected to measure certain residential mortgage loans held for sale under the fair value option as allowed under U.S. GAAP. Electing to measure residential mortgage loans held for sale at fair value reduces certain timing differences and better matches changes in the value of these assets with changes in the value of derivatives used as economic hedges for these assets. Management’s intent to sell residential mortgage loans classified as held for sale may change over time due to such factors as changes in the overall liquidity in markets or changes in characteristics specific to certain loans held for sale. Consequently, these loans may be reclassified to loans held for investment and maintained in the Bancorp’s loan portfolio. In such cases, the loans will continue to be measured at fair value.

Fair value changes recognized in earnings for instruments held at December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 for which the fair value option was elected, as well as the changes in fair value of the underlying IRLCs, included gains of $26$6 million and $20$17 million, respectively. These gains are reported in mortgage banking net revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Valuation adjustments related to instrument-specific credit risk for residential mortgage loans measured at fair value negatively impacted the fair value of those loans by $2 million at both December 31, 20142016 and 2013.2015. Interest on residential mortgage loans measured at fair value is accrued as it is earned using the effective interest method and is reported as interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

160  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following table summarizes the difference between the fair value and the principal balance for residential mortgage loans measured at fair value as of:

 

 

 
($ in millions)

Aggregate

Fair Value

 Aggregate Unpaid
Principal Balance
 Difference 

 

 

December 31, 2014

Residential mortgage loans measured at fair value

$                                     669                                       643  26  

Past due loans of 90 days or more

 2  2   

Nonaccrual loans

 3  3   

December 31, 2013

Residential mortgage loans measured at fair value

$982  962  20  

Past due loans of 90 days or more

 1  2                                       (1)  

Nonaccrual loans

 2  2   

 

 

 

 

($ in millions)

  

            Aggregate          

            Fair Value           

  

Aggregate Unpaid    

Principal Balance    

 

Difference            

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

    

Residential mortgage loans measured at fair value

  $829  823  6   

Past due loans of 90 days or more

   2  2  -   

Nonaccrual loans

   1  1  -   

 

 

December 31, 2015

    

Residential mortgage loans measured at fair value

  $686  669  17   

Past due loans of 90 days or more

   2  2  -   

Nonaccrual loans

   2  2  -   

 

 

 

161174  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Fair Value of Certain Financial Instruments

The following tables summarize the carrying amounts and estimated fair values for certain financial instruments, excluding financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

 
Net Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using     Total       Net Carrying   Fair Value Measurements Using   Total             
As of December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)Amount     Level 1     Level 2 Level 3         Fair Value     
As of December 31, 2016 ($ in millions)  Amount   Level 1          Level 2          Level 3            Fair Value         

 

 

Financial assets:

          

Cash and due from banks

$                    3,091  3,091  -   -   3,091   $2,392       2,392    -    -    2,392  

Other securities

 600  -   600  -   600    607       -    607    -    607  

Held-to-maturity securities

 187  -   -   187  187    26       -    -    26    26  

Other short-term investments

 7,914  7,914  -   -   7,914    2,754       2,754    -    -    2,754  

Loans held for sale

 700  -   -   700  700    65       -    -    65    65  

Portfolio loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

 40,092  -   -   40,781  40,781    40,958       -    -    41,976    41,976  

Commercial mortgage loans

 7,259  -   -   6,878  6,878    6,817       -    -    6,735    6,735  

Commercial construction loans

 2,052  -   -   1,735  1,735    3,887       -    -    3,853    3,853  

Commercial leases

 3,675  -   -   3,426  3,426    3,959       -    -    3,651    3,651  

Residential mortgage loans

 12,177  -   -   12,249  12,249    14,812       -    -    15,415    15,415  

Home equity

 8,799  -   -   9,224  9,224    7,637       -    -    8,421    8,421  

Automobile loans

 12,004  -   -   11,748  11,748    9,941       -    -    9,640    9,640  

Credit card

 2,297  -   -   2,586  2,586    2,135       -    -    2,503    2,503  

Other consumer loans and leases

 405  -   -   414  414    668       -    -    678    678  

Unallocated allowance for loan and lease losses

 (106 -   -   -   -  

Unallocated ALLL

   (112)      -    -    -     

 

 

Total portfolio loans and leases, net

 88,654  -   -   89,041  89,041   $90,702       -    -    92,872    92,872  

 

 

Financial liabilities:

          

Deposits

 101,712  -   101,715  -   101,715   $                    103,821       -    103,811    -    103,811  

Federal funds purchased

 144  144  -   -   144    132       132    -    -    132  

Other short-term borrowings

 1,556  -   1,561  -   1,561    3,535       -    3,535    -    3,535  

Long-term debt

 14,967  14,993  655  -   15,648    14,388       14,288    545    -    14,833  

 

 
                    

 

 
Net Carrying Fair Value Measurements Using     Total       Net Carrying   Fair Value Measurements Using   Total             
As of December 31, 2013 ($ in millions)

 

Amount

 

 

    Level 1    

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3    

 

 

    Fair Value    

 
As of December 31, 2015 ($ in millions)  Amount   Level 1          Level 2          Level 3            Fair Value         

 

 

Financial assets:

          

Cash and due from banks

$3,178  3,178  -   -   3,178   $2,540       2,540    -    -    2,540  

Other securities

 751  -   751  -   751    604       -    604    -    604  

Held-to-maturity securities

 208  -   -   208  208    70       -    -    70    70  

Other short-term investments

 5,116  5,116  -   -   5,116    2,671       2,671    -    -    2,671  

Loans held for sale

 54  -   -   54  54    384       -    -    384    384  

Portfolio loans and leases:

          

Commercial and industrial loans

 38,549  -   -   39,804  39,804    41,479       -    -    41,802    41,802  

Commercial mortgage loans

 7,854  -   -   7,430  7,430    6,840       -    -    6,656    6,656  

Commercial construction loans

 1,013  -   -   856  856    3,190       -    -    2,918    2,918  

Commercial leases

 3,572  -   -   3,261  3,261    3,807       -    -    3,533    3,533  

Residential mortgage loans

 12,399  -   -   11,541  11,541    13,449       -    -    14,061    14,061  

Home equity

 9,152  -   -   9,181  9,181    8,234       -    -    8,948    8,948  

Automobile loans

 11,961  -   -   11,748  11,748    11,453       -    -    11,170    11,170  

Credit card

 2,202  -   -   2,380  2,380    2,160       -    -    2,551    2,551  

Other consumer loans and leases

 348  -   -   361  361    646       -    -    643    643  

Unallocated allowance for loan and lease losses

 (110 -   -   -   -  

Unallocated ALLL

   (115)      -    -    -     

 

 

Total portfolio loans and leases, net

 86,940  -   -   86,562  86,562   $91,143       -    -    92,282    92,282  

 

 

Financial liabilities:

          

Deposits

 99,275  -   99,288  -   99,288   $103,205       -    103,219    -    103,219  

Federal funds purchased

 284  284  -   -   284    151       151    -    -    151  

Other short-term borrowings

 1,380  -   1,380  -   1,380    1,507       -    1,507    -    1,507  

Long-term debt

 9,633  9,645  577  -   10,222 

Long-term debt(a)

   15,810       15,603    625    -    16,228  

 

 
(a)

Upon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $34 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1.

 

Cash and due from banks, other securities, other short-term investments, deposits, federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings

For financial instruments with a short-term or no stated maturity, prevailing market rates and limited credit risk, carrying amounts approximate fair value. Those financial instruments include cash and due from banks, other securities consisting of FHLB, FRB and FRBDTCC restricted stock, other short-term investments, certain deposits (demand, interest checking, savings, money market, and foreign office

deposits and other deposits), federal funds purchased

and other short-term borrowings excluding FHLB borrowings. Fair values for other time deposits, certificates of deposit $100,000 and over and FHLB borrowings were estimated using a DCF calculation that applies prevailing LIBOR/swap interest rates and a spread for new issuances with similar terms.

 

 

162175  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Held-to-maturity securities

The Bancorp’sheld-to-maturity securities are primarily composed of instruments that provide income tax credits as the economic return on the investment. The fair value of these instruments is estimated based on current U.S. Treasury tax credit rates.

Loans held for sale

Fair values for commercial loans held for sale were valued based on executable bids when available, or on DCF models incorporating appraisals of the underlying collateral, as well as assumptions about investor return requirements and amounts and timing of expected cash flows. Fair values for residential mortgage loans held for sale were valued based on estimated third-party valuations utilizing recent sales data from similar transactions. Broker opinion statements were also obtained as additional evidence to support the third-party valuations. Fair values for other consumer loans held for sale were based on contractual values upon which the loans may be sold to a third party, and approximate their carrying value.

Portfolio loans and leases, net

Fair values were estimated based on either appraisals of the underlying collateral or by discounting future cash flows using the current market rates of loans to borrowers with similar credit characteristics, similar remaining maturities, prepayment speeds and loss severities. The Bancorp estimates fair values at the transaction level whenever possible. For certain products with a large number of homogenous transactions, the Bancorp employs a pool approach. This approach involves stratifying and sorting the entire population of transactions into a smaller number of pools with like characteristics. Characteristics may include maturity date, coupon, origination date and principal amortization method.

Long-term debt

Fair value of long-term debt was based on quoted market prices, when available, or a DCF calculation using LIBOR/swap interest rates and, in some cases, Fifth Third credit and/or debt instrument spreads for new issuances with similar terms.

 

163176  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

28. CERTAIN REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND CAPITAL RATIOS

 

The principal source of income and funds for the Bancorp (parent company) are dividends from its subsidiaries. The dividends paid by the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary are subject to regulations and limitations prescribed by the appropriate state and federal supervisory authorities. The Bancorp’s nonbank subsidiaries are also limited by certain federal and state statutory provisions and regulations covering the amount of dividends that may be paid in any given year.

The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary must maintain cash reserve balances when total reservable deposit liabilities are greater than the regulatory exemption. These reserve requirements may be satisfied with vault cash and balances on deposit with the FRB. In 2014 and 2013, the banking subsidiary was required to maintain average cash reserve balances of $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued capital adequacy guidelines pursuant to which it assesses the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising a BHC and in analyzing applications to it under the BHCA of 1956, as amended. These guidelines include quantitative measures that assign risk weightings to assets andoff-balance sheet items, as well as define and set minimum regulatory capital requirements. All bank holding companiesThe regulatory capital requirements were revised by the Basel III Final Rule which was effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject tophase-in periods for certain of its components and other provisions. It established quantitative measures that assign risk weightings to assets andoff-balance sheet items and also defined and set minimum regulatory capital requirements. The minimum capital ratios established under the Basel III Final Rule are required to maintainCommon equity Tier 1 capital of at least 4.5% (CET1 ratio), Tier I capital (core capital) of at least four percent6% of risk-weighted assets (Tier I risk-based capital ratio), totalTotal regulatory capital (Tier I plus Tier II capital) of at least eight percent8% of risk-weighted assets (Total risk-based capital ratio), and Tier I capital of at least three percent4% of adjusted quarterly average assets (Tier I leverage ratio). Failure to meet the minimum capital requirements can initiate certain actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Bancorp.

Additionally, when fullyphased-in in 2019, the Basel III Final Rule will include a capital conservation buffer requirement of 2.5% in addition to the minimum capital requirements of the CET1, Tier I capital consists principallyand Total risk-based capital ratios in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers.

The Basel III Final Rule provided for certain BHCs, including the Bancorp, to opt out of shareholders’ equity including Tier I qualifying TruPS. It excludes unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and unrecognized pension actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost, goodwill, certain other intangibles and unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges. The revisedAOCI in regulatory capital rules known asand also retained the treatment of residential mortgage exposures consistent with the prior Basel I capital rules. Fifth Third made aone-time permanent election to not include AOCI in regulatory capital in the March 31, 2015 FFIEC 031 for its banking subsidiary and FRY-9C filing for the Bancorp. The Basel III will phaseFinal Rule phases out the inclusion of certain TruPS as a component of Tier I capital when the rules become effective for the Bancorp beginning

January 1, 2015.capital. Under these provisions, these TruPS would qualify as a component of Tier II capital. At December 31, 2014,

2016, the Bancorp’s TruPS no longer qualified for Tier I capital, included $60compared to $13 million of TruPS, representing approximately 5 bpsor 1 bp of risk-weighted assets.assets, which qualified as Tier I capital at December 31, 2015. The Bancorp’s Tier II capital consists principally of term subordinated debt and, subject to limitations, allowances for credit losses.

AssetsThe Bancorp’s assets and credit equivalent amounts ofoff-balance sheet items are assigned to one of several broad risk categories according to the obligor, guarantor or nature of collateral.Standardized Approach for risk-weighting assets as defined in the Basel III Final Rule. The aggregate dollar value of the amount of each category is multiplied by the associated risk weighting of that category.weighting. The resulting weighted values from each of the risk categories in sum is the total risk-weighted assets. Quarterly average assets are a component of the Tier I leverage ratio and for this purpose do not include goodwill and any other intangible assets and other investments that the FRB determines should be deducted from Tier I capital.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued capital adequacy guidelines for banking subsidiaries substantially similar to those adopted for bank holding companies,BHCs, as described previously. In addition, the federalU.S. banking agencies have issued substantially similar regulations to implement the system of prompt corrective action established by Section 38 of the FDIA. Under the regulations, a bank generally shall be deemed to be well-capitalized if it has a CET1 ratio of 6.5% or more, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 8% or more, a Total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or more, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of six percent or more, a Tier I leverage ratio of five percent5% or more and is not subject to any written capital order or directive. If an institution becomes undercapitalized, it would become subject to significant additional oversight, regulations and requirements as mandated by the FDIA.

The Bancorp and its banking subsidiary, Fifth Third Bank, had CET1 capital, Tier I risk-based capital, Total risk-based capital and Tier I leverage ratios above the well-capitalized levels at December 31, 20142016 and 2013. As of December 31, 2014, the most recent notification from the FRB categorized the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.2015. To continue to qualify for financial holding company status pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary must, among other things, maintain “well-capitalized” capital ratios. In addition, the Bancorp exceeded the “capital conservation buffer” ratio for all periods presented.

 

 

The following table presents capital and risk-based capital and leverage ratios for the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary at December 31:

 

 

 2014   2013       2016        2015
  

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

($ in millions)  Amount    Ratio Amount Ratio       Amount      Ratio          Amount      Ratio(a)  

 

CET1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                    

Fifth Third Bancorp

  $    12,426      10.39  %     $    11,917      9.82  

Fifth Third Bank

     14,015      11.92         14,216      11.92  

Tier I risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                    

Fifth Third Bancorp (Consolidated)

$12,764       10.83%  $    12,094        10.43%    

Fifth Third Bancorp

     13,756      11.50         13,260      10.93  

Fifth Third Bank

13,760       11.85     13,245        11.59          14,015      11.92         14,216      11.92  

Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):

                    

Fifth Third Bancorp (Consolidated)

16,895       14.33     16,431        14.17     

Fifth Third Bancorp

     17,972      15.02         17,134      14.13  

Fifth Third Bank

15,213       13.10     14,785        12.94          16,175      13.76         15,642      13.12  

Tier I leverage (to average assets):

Fifth Third Bancorp (Consolidated)

12,764       9.66     12,094        9.73     

Tier I leverage (to quarterly average assets):

                    

Fifth Third Bancorp

     13,756      9.90         13,260      9.54  

Fifth Third Bank

13,760       10.58     13,245        10.83          14,015      10.30         14,216      10.43  

 

(a)

Ratios not restated for the adoption of the amended guidance of ASU2015-03 “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” For further information, refer to Note 1.

 

164177  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

29. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

Condensed Statements of Income (Parent Company Only)                                    

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)        2014         2013           2012            2016     2015    2014    

Income

        

Dividends from subsidiaries:

        

Consolidated bank subsidiaries(a)

$-  - -       

Consolidated nonbank subsidiary

 1,094  859 1,959       

Consolidated nonbank subsidiaries(a)

  $            1,886   1,040  1,094  

Interest on loans to subsidiaries

 14      14     17         18   15  14  

Total income

 1,108      873     1,976         1,904   1,055  1,108  

Expenses

        

Interest

 163  178 215         171   178  163  

Other

 17      36     61         18   22  17  

Total expenses

 180      214     276         189   200  180  

Income Before Income Taxes and Change in Undistributed Earnings of Subsidiaries

 928  659 1,700         1,715   855  928  

Applicable income tax benefit

 62      74     96         63   69  62  

Income Before Change in Undistributed Earnings of Subsidiaries

 990  733 1,796         1,778   924  990  

Change in undistributed earnings

 491      1,103     (220)        (214)  788  491  

Net Income

$                1,481      1,836     1,576         $            1,564   1,712  1,481  

(a) The Bancorp’s indirect banking subsidiary paid dividends to the Bancorp’s direct nonbank subsidiary holding company of$1.1 billion, $859 million and $2.0 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Parent Company Only)

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)

2014         2013         2012       

Net income

$1,481  1,836 1,576       

Other comprehensive income, net of tax:

Unrealized gains on cash flow hedge derivatives

 -      -     3       

Other comprehensive income

 -      -     3       

Comprehensive income attributable to Parent

$1,481      1,836     1,579       

Other Comprehensive Income

  

  

-

  

-

  

Comprehensive Income Attributable to Bancorp

  $            1,564   1,712  1,481  

  (a)

The Bancorp’s indirect banking subsidiary paid dividends to the Bancorp’s direct nonbank subsidiary holding company of$1.9 billion, $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion for the years endedDecember 31,2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Condensed Balance Sheets (Parent Company Only)          

 

As of December 31 ($ in millions)  2016                  2015     

 

Assets

     

Cash

  $130     128   

Short-term investments

   3,074     3,728   

Loans to subsidiaries:

     

Nonbank subsidiaries

   969     982   

 

Total loans to subsidiaries

   969     982   

 

Investment in subsidiaries:

     

Nonbank subsidiaries

   17,588     17,831   

 

Total investment in subsidiaries

   17,588     17,831   

 

Goodwill

   80     80   

Other assets

   366     414 (a)  

 

Total Assets

  $    22,207     23,163 (a)  

 

Liabilities

     

Other short-term borrowings

  $344     404   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   461     433   

Long-term debt (external)

   5,170     6,456 (a)  

 

Total Liabilities

  $5,975     7,293 (a)  

 

Shareholders’ Equity

     

Common stock

  $2,051     2,051   

Preferred stock

   1,331     1,331   

Capital surplus

   2,756     2,666   

Retained earnings

   13,441     12,358   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   59     197   

Treasury stock

   (3,433)    (2,764)  

Noncontrolling interests

   27     31   

 

Total Equity

   16,232     15,870   

 

Total Liabilities and Equity

  $            22,207     23,163 (a)  

 

  (a)

Upon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 Condensed Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $17 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information refer to Note 1.

 

165178  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Condensed Balance Sheets (Parent Company Only)              
As of December 31 ($ in millions)        2014       2013   

Assets

Cash

$-  - 

Short-term investments

 3,189  2,505 

Loans to subsidiaries:

Bank subsidiaries

 -  - 

Nonbank subsidiaries

 984     974  

Total loans to subsidiaries

 984     974  

Investment in subsidiaries

Nonbank subsidiaries

 17,186     16,254  

Total investment in subsidiaries

 17,186     16,254  

Goodwill

 80  80 

Other assets

 451     323  

Total Assets

$                21,890     20,136  

Liabilities

Other short-term borrowings

 426  311 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 405  442 

Long-term debt (external)

 5,394     4,757  

Total Liabilities

 6,225     5,510  

Shareholders’ Equity

Common stock

 2,051  2,051 

Preferred stock

 1,331  1,034 

Capital surplus

 2,646  2,561 

Retained earnings

 11,141  10,156 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 429  82 

Treasury stock

 (1,972 (1,295

Noncontrolling interests

 39     37  

Total Equity

 15,665     14,626  

Total Liabilities and Equity

$21,890     20,136  

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Parent Company Only)                       
For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)        2014       2013           2012       

Operating Activities

Net income

$                1,481  1,836  1,576 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

(Benefit from) provision for deferred income taxes

 (1 (1 2 

Net change in undistributed earnings

 (491 (1,103 220 

Net change in:

Other assets

 8  13  57 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 (40    (28    18  

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

 957     717     1,873  

Investing Activities

Net change in:

Short-term investments

 (684 976  107 

Loans to subsidiaries

 (10    47     11  

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities

 (694    1,023     118  

Financing Activities

Net change in other short-term borrowings

 115  (255 (89

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

 499  750  500 

Repayment of long-term debt

 -  (1,500 (1,440

Dividends paid on common shares

 (423 (393 (309

Dividends paid on preferred shares

 (67 (37 (35

Issuance of preferred stock

 297  1,034  - 

Repurchases of treasury shares and related forward contracts

 (654 (1,320 (650

Other, net

 (30    (19    (18 

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

 (263    (1,740    (2,041 

Net Decrease in Cash

 -  -  (50

Cash at Beginning of Year

 -     -     50  

Cash at End of Year

$-     -     -  

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Parent Company Only)                        

 

For the years ended December 31 ($ in millions)        2016       2015       2014     

 

Operating Activities

               

Net income

  $      1,564      1,712      1,481  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

               

Benefit from deferred income taxes

       -      (4     (1 

Net change in undistributed earnings

       214      (788     (491 

Net change in:

               

Other assets

       14      (18     9  

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

       (35     31      (41 

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

       1,757      933      957  

 

Investing Activities

               

Net change in:

               

Short-term investments

       654      (539     (684 

Loans to subsidiaries

       13      2      (10 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

       667      (537     (694 

 

Financing Activities

               

Net change in other short-term borrowings

       (60     (22     115  

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

       -      1,099      499  

Repayment of long-term debt

       (1,250     -      -  

Dividends paid on common stock

       (402     (422     (423 

Dividends paid on preferred stock

       (52     (75     (67 

Issuance of preferred stock

       -      -      297  

Repurchase of treasury stock and related forward contract

       (661     (850     (654 

Other, net

       3      2      (30 

 

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

       (2,422     (268     (263 

 

Increase in Cash

       2      128      -  

Cash at Beginning of Period

       128      -      -  

 

Cash at End of Period

  $      130      128      -  

 

 

166179  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

30. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

 

The Bancorp reports on four business segments: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending and Wealth and Asset Management (formerly Investment Advisors.Advisors). Results of the Bancorp’s business segments are presented based on its management structure and management accounting practices. The structure and accounting practices are specific to the Bancorp; therefore, the financial results of the Bancorp’s business segments are not necessarily comparable with similar information for other financial institutions. The Bancorp refines its methodologies from time to time as management’s accounting practices and businesses change.

The Bancorp manages interest rate risk centrally at the corporate level bylevel. By employing an FTP methodology. This methodology, insulates the business segments are insulated from most benchmark interest rate volatility, enabling them to focus on serving customers through loan originationsthe origination of loans and deposit taking.acceptance of deposits. The FTP systemmethodology assigns charge rates and credit rates to classes of assets and liabilities, respectively, based on expectedthe estimated amount and timing of cash flows for each transaction. Assigning the FTP rate based on matching the duration and the U.S. swap curve. Matching durationof cash flows allocates interest income and interest expense to each business segment so its resulting net interest income is insulated from future changes in benchmark interest rate risk. In a rising rate environment, the Bancorp benefits from the widening spread between deposit costs and wholesale funding costs. However, therates. The Bancorp’s FTP system credits this benefitmethodology also allocates the contribution to net interest income of the asset-generating and deposit-providing businesses such as Branch Banking and Investment Advisors, on a duration-adjusted basis. The netbasis to better attribute the driver of the performance. As the asset and liability durations are not perfectly matched, the residual impact of the FTP methodology is captured in General Corporate and Other. The charge and credit rates are determined using the FTP rate curve, which is based on an estimate of Fifth Third’s marginal borrowing cost in the wholesale funding markets. The FTP curve is constructed using the U.S. swap curve, brokered CD pricing and unsecured debt pricing.

The Bancorp adjusts the FTP charge and credit rates as dictated by changes in interest rates for various interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and by the review of behavioural assumptions, such as prepayment rates on interest-earning assets and the estimated durations for the indeterminate-lived deposits. TheKey assumptions, including the credit raterates provided for demand deposit accounts, isare reviewed annually based upon the account type, its estimated durationannually. Credit rates for deposit products and the corresponding fed funds, U.S. swap curve or swap rate.charge rates for loan products may be reset more frequently in response to changes in market conditions. The credit rates for several deposit products were reset January 1, 20142016 to reflect the current market rates and updated market assumptions. These rates were generally higher than those in place during 2013,2015, thus net interest income for deposit providing businessesdeposit-providing business segments was positively impacted during 2014.

The2016. FTP charge rates on assets were affected by the prevailing level of interest rates and by the duration and repricing characteristics of the portfolio. As overall market rates increased, the FTP charge increased for asset-generating business segments are chargedduring 2016.

During the first quarter of 2016, the Bancorp refined its methodology for allocating provision for loan and lease losses expense based onto the business segments to include charges or benefits associated with changes in criticized commercial loan levels in addition to actual net charge-offs experienced by the loans and leases owned by each business segment. The results of operations

and financial position for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were adjusted to reflect this change. Provision for loan and lease losses expense attributable to loan and lease growth and changes in ALLL factors are captured in General Corporate and Other. The financial results of the business segments include allocations for shared services and headquarters expenses. Additionally, the business segments form synergies by taking advantage of cross-sell opportunities and when funding operations by accessing the capital markets as a collective unit.

The results of operations and financial position for the years ended December 31, 20132015 and 20122014 were adjusted to reflect the transfer of certain customers and Bancorp employees from Branch Banking to Commercial Banking, effective January 1, 2014. In addition, the 2013 and 2012 balances were adjusted to reflect a changechanges in internal expense allocation methodology.methodologies.

The following is a description of each of the Bancorp’s business segments and the products and services they provide to their respective client bases.

Commercial Banking offers credit intermediation, cash management and financial services to large and middle-market businesses and government and professional customers. In addition to the traditional lending and depository offerings, Commercial Banking products and services include global cash management, foreign exchange and international trade finance, derivatives and capital markets services, asset-based lending, real estate finance, public finance, commercial leasing and syndicated finance.

Branch Banking provides a full range of deposit and loan and lease products to individuals and small businesses through 1,3021,191 full-service Banking Centers.banking centers. Branch Banking offers depository and loan products, such as checking and savings accounts, home equity loans and lines of credit, credit cards and loans for automobiles and other personal financing needs, as well as products designed to meet the specific needs of small businesses, including cash management services.

Consumer Lending includes the Bancorp’s residential mortgage, home equity, automobile and other indirect lending activities. Direct lending activities include the origination, retention and servicing of residential mortgage and home equity loans or lines of credit, sales and securitizations of those loans, pools of loans or lines of credit, and all associated hedging activities. Indirect lending activities include extending loans to consumers through correspondent lenders and automobile dealers.

Investment AdvisorsWealth and Asset Management provides a full range of investment alternatives for individuals, companies andnot-for-profit organizations. In the second quarter of 2016, the Investment Advisors segment name was changed to Wealth and Asset Management to better reflect the services provided by the business segment. Wealth and Asset Management is made up of four main businesses: FTS, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp; ClearArc Capital, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bancorp; Fifth Third Private Bank; and Fifth Third Institutional Services. FTS offers full service retail brokerage services to individual clients and broker dealerbroker-dealer services to the institutional marketplace. ClearArc Capital, Inc. provides asset management services and previously advised the Bancorp’s proprietary family of mutual funds.services. Fifth Third Private Bank offers holistic strategies to affluent clients in wealth planning, investing, insurance and wealth protection. Fifth Third Institutional Services provides advisory services for institutional clients including states and municipalities.

 

 

167180  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Results of operations and assets by segment for each of the three years ended December 31 are:

 

2014 ($ in millions)  Commercial 
  Banking 
 Branch  
Banking  
 Consumer  
Lending  
 Investment  
Advisors  
 General 
Corporate 
and Other 
 Eliminations  Total    

Net interest income

$1,652   1,546   257  121   3  -  3,579 

Provision for loan and lease losses

 235   181   156    (260 -  315 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

 1,417   1,365   101  118   263  -  3,264 

Noninterest income:

Service charges on deposits

 286   272   -     -   -  560 

Corporate banking revenue

 429   4   -     (5 -  430 

Investment advisory revenue

   152   -   397   1  (146) (a) 407 

Mortgage banking net revenue

    5   304    -   -  310 

Card and processing revenue

 64   226   -     -   -  295 

Other noninterest income

 105   61 (b)  42    239  -  450 

Securities gains, net

    -   -      21  -  21 

Securities gains, net - non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

    -   -      -   -  

Total noninterest income

 887   720   346  410   256  (1462,473 

Noninterest expense:

Salaries, wages and incentives

 259   421   95  136   538  -  1,449 

Employee benefits

 47   116   27  26   118  -  334 

Net occupancy expense

 26   187   8    83  -  313 

Technology and communications

 10   4   2     196  -  212 

Card and processing expense

   133   -      -   -  141 

Equipment expense

 10   59   -      52  -  121 

Other noninterest expense

 959   631   420  274   (999 (1461,139 

Total noninterest expense

 1,319   1,551   552  445   (12 (1463,709 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 985   534   (105 83   531  -  2,028 

Applicable income tax expense (benefit)

 166   188   (37 29   199  -  545 

Net income (loss)

 819   346   (68 54   332  -  1,483 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   -   -      2  -  

Net income (loss) attributable to Bancorp

 819   346   (68 54   330  -  1,481 

Dividends on preferred stock

    -   -      67  -  67 

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

$819   346   (68 54   263  -  1,414 

Total goodwill

$613   1,655   -   148   -   -  2,416 

Total assets

$          56,871   50,920   22,554  10,443   (2,082 -  138,706 

The following tables present the results of operations and assets by business segment for the years ended December 31:

 

 

                    Wealth         General              
     Commercial      Branch           Consumer    and Asset       Corporate            
2016 ($ in millions)    Banking          Banking          Lending      Management    and Other      Eliminations      Total      

 

Net interest income

 $  1,814      1,669      248    168    (284)     -      3,615  

Provision for loan and lease losses

  76      138      44    1    84      -      343  

 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

  1,738      1,531      204    167    (368)     -      3,272  

 

Total noninterest income

  907 (c)    755(b)    303    399    463      (131)(a)    2,696  

Total noninterest expense

  1,426      1,621      475    422    90      (131)     3,903  

 

Income before income taxes

  1,219      665      32    144    5      -      2,065  

Applicable income tax expense

  224      234      12    51    (16)     -      505  

 

Net income

  995      431      20    93    21      -      1,560  

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  -      -      -    -    (4)     -      (4) 

 

Net income attributable to Bancorp

  995      431      20    93    25      -      1,564  

Dividends on preferred stock

  -      -      -    -    75      -      75  

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 $  995      431      20    93    (50)     -      1,489  

 

Total goodwill

 $  613      1,655      -    148    -       -      2,416  

 

Total assets

 $  58,092      55,940      22,041    9,487    (3,383)(d)         142,177  

 

(a)     Revenue sharing agreements between wealth and asset management and branch banking are eliminated in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)     Includes impairment charges of$32 for branches and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 27.

(c)     Includes impairment charges of$20 for operating lease equipment. For more information refer to Note 8 and Note 27.

(d)     Includes bank premises and equipment of$39 classified as held for sale. For more information, refer to Note 7.

 

 

                    Wealth         General              
     Commercial      Branch           Consumer    and Asset       Corporate            
2015 ($ in millions)    Banking          Banking          Lending      Management    and Other      Eliminations      Total      

 

Net interest income

 $  1,625      1,555      249    128    (24)     -      3,533  

Provision for loan and lease losses

  298      151      44    3    (100)     -      396  

 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

  1,327      1,404      205    125    76      -      3,137  

 

Total noninterest income

  853 (c)    652(b)    407    418    822      (149)(a)    3,003  

Total noninterest expense

  1,369      1,598      440    455    62      (149)     3,775  

 

Income before income taxes

  811      458      172    88    836      -      2,365  

Applicable income tax expense

  93      161      61    30    314      -      659  

 

Net income

  718      297      111    58    522      -      1,706  

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  -      -      -    -    (6)     -      (6) 

 

Net income attributable to Bancorp

  718      297      111    58    528      -      1,712  

Dividends on preferred stock

  -      -      -    -    75      -      75  

 

Net income available to common shareholders

 $  718      297      111    58    453      -      1,637  

 

Total goodwill

 $  613      1,655      -    148    -      -      2,416  

 

Total assets(e)

 $  58,105      53,609      22,656    9,939    (3,261)(d)         141,048  

 

(a)

Revenue sharing agreements between Investment Advisorswealth and Branch Banking are eliminated in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)Includes an impairment charge of$20 for branchesasset management and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 27 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

168  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2013 ($ in millions)    Commercial 
    Banking 
 Branch  
Banking  
 Consumer  
Lending  
 Investment  
Advisors  
 General 
Corporate 
and Other 
 Eliminations  Total 

Net interest income

$1,592   1,356   312   154   147  -   3,561 

Provision for loan and lease losses

 194   210   92     (269 -   229 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

 1,398   1,146   220   152   416  -   3,332 

Noninterest income:

Service charges on deposits

 267   279        -   -   549 

Corporate banking revenue

 392   7        (2 -   400 

Investment advisory revenue

   148      384   -   (144) (a)  393 

Mortgage banking net revenue

   12   687     -   -   700 

Card and processing revenue

 60   207        -   -   272 

Other noninterest income

 94   87 (b)  45   10   643  -   879 

Securities gains, net

    -        18  -   21 

Securities gains, net - non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

    -   13      -   -   13 

Total noninterest income

 818   740   748   406   659  (144 3,227 

Noninterest expense:

Salaries, wages and incentives

 261   429   175   134   582  -   1,581 

Employee benefits

 49   118   40   25   125  -   357 

Net occupancy expense

 25   183     10   81  -   307 

Technology and communications

 11   4        188  -   204 

Card and processing expense

   125         1  -   134 

Equipment expense

   58        51  -   114 

Other noninterest expense

 877   656   460   284   (869 (144 1,264 

Total noninterest expense

 1,235   1,573   685   453   159  (144 3,961 

Income before income taxes

 981   313   283   105   916  -   2,598 

Applicable income tax expense

 167   109   100   37   359  -   772 

Net income

 814   204   183   68   557  -   1,826 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    -         (10 -   (10

Net income attributable to Bancorp

 814   204   183   68   567  -   1,836 

Dividends on preferred stock

    -         37  -   37 

Net income available to common shareholders

$814   204   183   68   530  -   1,799 

Total goodwill

$613   1,655      148   -   -   2,416 

Total assets

$          55,081   47,221   22,610   10,711   (5,180 -   130,443 
(a)

Revenue sharing agreements between Investment Advisors and Branch Bankingbranch banking are eliminated in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Includes an impairment chargecharges of $6$109 for branches and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 27.

(c)

Includes impairment charges of $36 for operating lease equipment. For more information, refer to Note 8 and Note 27.

(d)

Includes bank premises and equipment of $81 classified as held for sale. For more information, refer to Note 7.

(e)

Upon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $34 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1.

 

169181  Fifth Third Bancorp


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

2012 ($ in millions)  Commercial 
  Banking 
 Branch  
Banking  
 Consumer  
Lending  
 Investment  
Advisors  
 General 
Corporate 
and Other 
 Eliminations 
 Total 

Net interest income

$1,533  1,261   314  117  370  -   3,595 

Provision for loan and lease losses

 249  268   176  10  (400 -   303 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

 1,284  993   138  107  770  -   3,292 

Noninterest income:

Service charges on deposits

 251  268   -   3  -   -   522 

Corporate banking revenue

 402  8   -   3  -   -   413 

Investment advisory revenue

 6  129   -   366  -   (127(a)  374 

Mortgage banking net revenue

 -   14   830  1  -   -   845 

Card and processing revenue

 54  195   -   4  -   -   253 

Other noninterest income

 61  85 (b)  42  19  367  -   574 

Securities gains, net

 -   -   1  -   14  -   15 

Securities gains, net - non-qualifying hedges on mortgage servicing rights

 -   -   3  -   -   -   3 

Total noninterest income

 774  699   876  396  381  (127 2,999 

Noninterest expense:

Salaries, wages and incentives

 257  420   192  136  602  -   1,607 

Employee benefits

 47  117   39  25  143  -   371 

Net occupancy expense

 24  184   8  11  75  -   302 

Technology and communications

 10  3   1  -   182  -   196 

Card and processing expense

 5  115   -   -   1  -   121 

Equipment expense

 2  54   1  1  52  -   110 

Other noninterest expense

 842  576   429  264  (610 (127 1,374 

Total noninterest expense

 1,187  1,469   670  437  445  (127 4,081 

Income before income taxes

 871  223   344  66  706  -   2,210 

Applicable income tax expense

 157  79   121  23  256  -   636 

Net income

 714  144   223  43  450  -   1,574 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 -   -   -   -   (2 -   (2

Net income attributable to Bancorp

 714  144   223  43  452  -   1,576 

Dividends on preferred stock

 -   -   -   -   35  -   35 

Net income available to common shareholders

$714  144   223  43  417  -   1,541 

Total goodwill

$613  1,655   -   148  -   -   2,416 

Total assets

$          51,392  46,157   24,657  9,212  (9,524 -   121,894 

 

 
2014 ($ in millions)    Commercial 
Banking 
     Branch        
Banking        
 Consumer 
Lending 
     Wealth
and Asset
Management
     General  
Corporate  
and Other  
    Eliminations      Total   

 

 

Net interest income

 $   1,627     1,573      258       121     

-  

    -       3,579  

Provision for loan and lease losses

   141     171      156       1     (154)     -       315  

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses

   1,486     1,402      102       120     154      -       3,264  

 

 

Total noninterest income

   880     726 (b)    350       410     253      (146)(a)     2,473  

Total noninterest expense

   1,281     1,587      558       443     (14)     (146)      3,709  

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   1,085     541      (106)      87     421      -       2,028  

Applicable income tax expense (benefit)

   201     191      (37)      29     161      -       545  

 

 

Net income (loss)

   884     350      (69)      58     260      -       1,483  

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   -     -            -     2      -        

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Bancorp

   884     350      (69)      58     258      -       1,481  

Dividends on preferred stock

   -     -            -     67      -       67  

 

 

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders

 $   884     350      (69)      58     191      -       1,414  

 

 

Total goodwill

 $   613     1,655            148     -      -       2,416  

 

 

Total assets(d)

 $   56,400     51,488      22,567       10,445     (2,230)(c)         138,670  

 

 
(a)

Revenue sharing agreements between Investment Advisorswealth and Branch Bankingasset management and branch banking are eliminated in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(b)

Includes an impairment chargecharges of $21$20 for branches and land. For more information refer to Note 7 and Note 27.

(c)

Includes bank premises and equipment of $26 classified as held for sale. For more information, refer to Note 7.

(d)

Upon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the December 31, 2014 Consolidated Balance Sheet was adjusted to reflect the reclassification of $36 of debt issuance costs from other assets to long-term debt. For further information, refer to Note 1.

31. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On January 22, 2015, the Bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the Bancorp purchased 8,542,713 shares, or approximately $180 million, of its outstanding common stock on January 27, 2015. The Bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its Board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on March 18, 2014. The Bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before April 23, 2015.

 

170182  Fifth Third Bancorp


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR

15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142016

Commission file number001-33653

LOGOLOGO

Incorporated in the State of Ohio

I.R.S. Employer IdentificationNo. 31-0854434

Address: 38 Fountain Square Plaza

Cincinnati, Ohio 45263

Telephone:(800) 972-3030

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class:

  

Name of each exchange

on which registered:

Common Stock, Without Par Value  The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Depositary Shares Representing a 1/1000th Ownership Interest in aShare of 6.625% Fixed-to-Floating RateNon-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I  The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes:x ☒ No:¨ ☐

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes: ¨ No:x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes:x No:¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes:x No:¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated

filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨Non-accelerated Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act). Yes: ¨ No: x

There were 814,765,191750,864,896 shares of the Bancorp’s Common Stock, without par value, outstanding as of January 31, 2015.2017. The Aggregate Market Value of the Voting Stock held bynon-affiliates of the Bancorp was $17,964,278,097$13,447,748,736 as of June 30, 2014.2016.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

This report incorporates into a single document the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with respect to annual reports on Form10-K and annual reports to shareholders. The Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 20152017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

Only those sections of this 20142016 Annual Report to Shareholders that are specified in this Cross Reference Index constitute part of the Registrant’s Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2016. No other information contained in this 20142016 Annual Report to Shareholders shall be deemed to constitute any part of this Form10-K nor shall any such information be incorporated into the Form10-K and shall not be deemed “filed” as part of the Registrant’s Form10-K.

10-K Cross Reference Index

PART I

  

Item 1.

 Business   16-20, 172-179184-190 
 Employees   4147 
 Segment Information   43-49, 167-17050-57, 180-182 
 Average Balance Sheets   3743 
 Analysis of Net Interest Income and Net Interest Income Changes   36-3842-44 
 Investment Securities Portfolio   53-54, 101-10261-63, 113-114 
 Loan and Lease Portfolio   52-53, 103-10460-61,115-116 
 Risk Elements of Loan and Lease Portfolio   57-7367-81 
 Deposits   54-5663-65 
 Return on Equity and Assets   1531 
 Short-term Borrowings   56, 12765, 138 

Item 1A.

 Risk Factors   27-35191-201 

Item 1B.

 Unresolved Staff Comments   None 

Item 2.

 Properties   180202 

Item 3.

 Legal Proceedings   134-135146-147 

Item 4.

 Mine Safety Disclosures   N/A 
 Executive Officers of the Bancorp   180202 

PART II

  

Item 5.

 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities   181203 

Item 6.

 Selected Financial Data   1531 

Item 7.

 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   15-8231-91 

Item 7A.

 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk   73-7681-85 

Item 8.

 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   85-17095-182 

Item 9.

 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   None 

Item 9A.

 Controls and Procedures   8392 

Item 9B.

 Other Information   None 

PART III

  

Item 10.

 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance   183205 

Item 11.

 Executive Compensation   183205 

Item 12.

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters   147-150, 183160-163, 205 

Item 13.

 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence   183205 

Item 14.

 Principal Accounting Fees and Services   183205 

PART IV

  

Item 15.

 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules   183-185205-208 

SIGNATURES

   186209 
 

 

171183  Fifth Third Bancorp


AVAILABILITY OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Fifth Third Bancorp (the “Bancorp”) files reports with the SEC. Those reports include the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and proxy statements, as well as any amendments to those reports. The public may read and copy any materials the Bancorp files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The Bancorp’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are accessible at no cost on the Bancorp’s web site at www.53.com on a same day basis after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

General Information

TheFifth Third Bancorp (the “Bancorp”), an Ohio corporation organized in 1975, is a bank holding company (“BHC”) as defined by the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and is registered as such with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”).

The Bancorp’s principal officeBancorp is locateda diversified financial services company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $142 billion in assets and operates 1,191 full-service Banking Centers, and 2,495 ATMs in Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Florida, Tennessee, West Virginia, Georgia and North Carolina. Fifth Third operates four main businesses: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending, and Wealth & Asset Management. Fifth Third also has a 17.9% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC. The carrying value of the Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC was $414 million as of December 31, 2016. Fifth Third is among the largest money managers in the Midwest and, as of December 31, 2016, had $315 billion in assets under care, of which it managed $31 billion for individuals, corporations andnot-for-profit organizations.Investor information andpress releases can be viewed atwww.53.com. Fifth Third’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ® Global Select Market under the symbol “FITB.”

The Bancorp’s subsidiaries provide a wide range of financial products and services to the retail, commercial, financial, governmental, educational, energy and medical sectors, including a wide variety of checking, savings and money market accounts, treasury management products, wealth management solutions, payments and commerce solutions, insurance services and credit products such as credit cards, installment loans, mortgage loans and leases. These products and services are delivered through a variety of channels and methods including the Company’s Banking Centers, other offices, telephone sales, the internet and mobile applications. Fifth Third Bank has deposit insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) through the Deposit Insurance Fund. Refer to Exhibit 21 filed as an attachment to this Annual Report on Form10-K for a list of subsidiaries of the Bancorp as of December 31, 2014.2016.

The Bancorp derives the majority of its revenues from the U.S. Revenue from foreign countries and external customers domiciled in foreign countries is immaterial to the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additional information regarding the Bancorp’s businesses is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Availability of Financial Information

The Bancorp files reports with the SEC. Those reports include the annual report on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q, current reports on Form8-K and proxy statements, as well as any amendments to those reports. The public may read and copy any materials the Bancorp files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The Bancorp’s annual report on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form

10-Q, current reports onForm 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are accessible at no cost on the Bancorp’s web site at https://www.53.com on a same day basis after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Competition

The Bancorp competes for deposits, loans and other banking services in its principal geographic markets as well as in selected national markets as opportunities arise. In addition to traditional financial institutions, the challenge of attracting and retaining customers for traditional banking services, the Bancorp’s competitors includeBancorp competes with securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors and insurance companies as well as financial technology companies. These competitors, with focused products targeted at highly profitable customer segments,companies compete across geographic boundaries and provide customers increasing access towith meaningful alternatives to traditional banking services in nearly all significant products. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in technology, product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. These competitive trends are likely to continue.

Acquisitions and Investments

The Bancorp’s strategy for growth includes strengthening its presence in core markets, expanding into contiguous markets and broadening its product offerings while taking into account the integration and other risks of growth. The Bancorp evaluates strategic acquisition and investment opportunities and conducts due diligence activities in connection with possible transactions. As a result, discussions, and in some cases, negotiations may take place and future acquisitions involving cash, debt or equity securities may occur. These typically involve the payment of a premium over book value and current market price, and therefore, some dilution of book value and net income per share may occur with any future transactions.

Regulation and Supervision

In addition to the generally applicable state and federal laws governing businesses and employers, the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to extensive regulation by federal and state laws and regulations applicable to financial institutions and their parent companies. Virtually all aspects of the business of the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to specific requirements or restrictions and general regulatory oversight. The

172  Fifth Third Bancorp


principal objectives of state and federal banking laws and regulations and the supervision, regulation and examination of banks and their parent companies (such as the Bancorp) by bank regulatory agencies are the maintenance of the safety and soundness of financial institutions, maintenance of the federal deposit insurance system and the protection of consumers or classes of consumers, rather than the specific protection of shareholders of a bank or the parent company of a bank. The Bancorp and its subsidiaries are subject to an extensive regulatory framework of complex and comprehensive federal and state laws and regulations addressing the provision of banking and other financial services and other aspects of the Bancorp’s businesses and operations. Regulation and regulatory oversight have increased significantly since 2010 as a result of the passage of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “DFA”).

184  Fifth Third Bancorp


The DFA imposes regulatory requirements and oversight over banks and other financial institutions in a number of ways, among which are (i) creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) to regulate consumer financial products and services; (ii) creating the Financial Stability Oversight Council to identify and impose additional regulatory oversight on large financial firms; (iii) granting orderly liquidation authority to the FDIC for the liquidation of financial corporations that pose a risk to the financial system of the U.S.; (iv) requiring financial institutions to draft a resolution plan that contemplates the dissolution of the enterprise and submit that resolution plan to both the Federal Reserve and the FDIC; (v) limiting debit card interchange fees; (vi) adopting certain changes to shareholder rights and responsibilities, including a shareholder “say on pay” vote on executive compensation; (vii) strengthening the SEC’s powers to regulate securities markets; (viii) regulating OTC derivative markets; (ix) restricting variable-rate lending by requiring the ability to repay to be determined for variable-rate loans by using the maximum rate that will apply during the first five years of a variable-rate loan term, and making more loans subject to provisions for higher cost loans, new disclosures, and certain other revisions; (x) changing the base upon which the deposit insurance assessment is assessed from deposits to, substantially, average consolidated assets minus equity; and (xi) amending the Truth in Lending Act with respect to mortgage originations, including originator compensation, minimum repayment standards, and prepayment considerations. To the extent the following material describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statute or regulation. In addition, due to the volume of regulations required by the DFA, not all proposed or final regulations that may have an impact on the Bancorp or its banking subsidiary are necessarily discussed.

Regulators

The Bancorp and/or its banking subsidiary are subject to regulation and supervision primarily by the FRB, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”)CFPB and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions (the “Division”) and additionally by certain other functional regulators and self-regulatory organizations. The Bancorp is also subject to regulation by the SEC by virtue of its status as a public company and due to the nature of some of its businesses. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to regulation by the FDIC, which insures the bank’s deposits as permitted by law.

The federal and state laws and regulations that are applicable to banks and to BHCs regulate, among other matters, the scope of their business, their activities, their investments, their capital and liquidity levels, their reserves against deposits, the timing of the availability of deposited funds, the amount of loans to individual and related borrowers and the nature, the amount of and collateral for certain loans, and the amount of interest that may be charged on loans as applicable. Various federal and state consumer laws and regulations also affect the services provided to consumers.

The Bancorp and/or its banking subsidiary are required to file various reports with, and is subject to examination by regulators, including the FRB and the Division. The FRB, the Division and the CFPB have the authority to issue orders for BHCs and/or banks to cease and desist from certain banking practices and violations of conditions imposed by, or violations of agreements with, the FRB, the Division and the CFPB. Certain of the Bancorp’s and/or its banking subsidiary regulators are also empowered to assess civil money penalties against companies or individuals in certain situations, such as when there is a violation of a law or regulation.

Applicable state and federal laws also grant certain regulators the authority to impose additional requirements and restrictions on the activities of the Bancorp and or its banking subsidiary and, in some situations, the imposition of such additional requirements and restrictions will not be publicly available information.

Acquisitions

The BHCA requires the prior approval of the FRB for a BHC to acquire substantially all the assets of a bank or to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of the voting shares of any bank, BHC or savings association, or to increase any suchnon-majority ownership or control of any bank, BHC or savings association, or to merge or consolidate with any BHC.

The BHCA prohibits a BHC from acquiring a direct or indirect interest in or control of more than 5% of any class of the voting shares of a company that is not a bank or a BHC and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to its banking subsidiaries, except that it may engage in and may own shares of companies engaged in certain activities the FRB

has determined to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be proper incident thereto.

Financial Holding Companies

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“GLBA”) permits a qualifying BHC to become a financial holding company (“FHC”) and thereby to engage directly or indirectly in a broader range of activities than those permitted for a BHC under the BHCA. Permitted activities for a FHC include securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting and brokerage, merchant banking and other activities that are declared by the FRB, in cooperation with the Treasury Department, to be “financial in nature or incidental thereto” or are declared by the FRB unilaterally to be “complementary” to financial activities. In addition, a FHC is allowed to conduct permissible new financial activities or acquire permissiblenon-bank financial companies withafter-the-fact notice to the FRB. A BHC may elect to become a FHC if each of its banking subsidiaries is well capitalized, is well managed and has at least a “Satisfactory” rating under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”). The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “DFA”)DFA also extended the well capitalized and well managed requirement to the BHC. In 2000, the Bancorp elected and qualified for FHC status under the GLBA. To maintain FHC status, a holding company must continue to meet certain requirements. The failure to meet such requirements could result in material restrictions on the activities of the FHC and may also adversely affect the FHC’s ability to enter into certain transactions or obtain necessary approvals in connection therewith, as well as loss of FHC status. If restrictions are imposed on the activities of an FHC, such information may not necessarily be available to the public.

Dividends

The Bancorp depends in part upon dividends received from its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including its indirect banking subsidiary, to fund its activities, including the payment of dividends. The Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to various federal and state restrictions on their ability to pay dividends. The FRB has authority to prohibit BHCs from paying dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice.

185  Fifth Third Bancorp


The FRB has indicated generally that it may be an unsafe or unsound practice for BHCs to pay dividends unless a BHC’s net income is sufficient to fund the dividends and the expected rate of earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The ability to pay dividends may be further limited by provisions of the DFA and implanting regulations (see “Regulatory Reform”)Systematically Significant Companies and Capital).

Source of Strength

Under long-standing FRB policy and now as codified in the DFA, a BHC is expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its banking subsidiaries and to commit resources to their support. This support may be required at times when the BHC may not have the resources to provide it.

FDIC Assessments

As contemplated byPursuant to the DFA, in 2011 the FDIC has revised the framework by which insured depository institutions with more than $10 billion in assets (“large IDIs”) are assessed for purposes of payments to the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”). The final rule implementing revisions to the assessment system took effect for the quarter beginning April 1, 2011.

173  Fifth Third Bancorp


Prior to the passage of the DFA, a large IDI’s DIF premiums principally were based on the size of an IDI’s domestic deposit base. The DFA changed the assessment base from a large IDI’s domestic deposit base to its total assets less tangible equity. In addition to potentially greatly increasing the size of a large IDI’s assessment base, the expansion of the assessment base affords the FDIC much greater flexibility to vary its assessment system based upon the different asset classes that large IDIs normally hold on their balance sheets.

To implement this provision, the FDIC created an assessment scheme vastly different from the deposit-based system. Under the new system, large IDIs are assessed under a complex “scorecard” methodology that seeks to capture both the probability that an individual large IDI will fail and the magnitude of the impact on the DIF if such a failure occurs.

During the first quarter of 2016, the FDIC issued a final rule implementing a 4.5 bps surcharge on the quarterly FDIC insurance assessments of insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more. The Bancorp became subject to the FDIC surcharge and reduced regular FDIC insurance assessments on July 1, 2016. The surcharges will continue through the quarter that the DIF reserve ratio first reaches or exceeds 1.35% of insured deposits, but not later than December 31, 2018. If the reserve ratio does not reach 1.35% by December 31, 2018, the FDIC will impose a shortfall assessment on March 31, 2019, on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more.

Transactions with Affiliates

Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, restrict transactions between a bank and its affiliates (as defined in Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act), including a parent BHC. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to certain restrictions, including but not limited to restrictions on loans to its affiliates, on investments in the stock or securities thereof, on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower, and on the issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on their behalf. Among other things, these restrictions limit the amount of such transactions, require collateral in prescribed amounts for extensions of credit, prohibit the purchase of low quality assets and require that the terms of such transactions be substantially equivalent to terms of comparable transactions withnon-affiliates. Generally, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is limited in its extension of credit to any affiliate to 10% of the banking subsidiary’s capital stock and surplus and its extension of credit to all affiliates to 20% of the banking subsidiary’s capital stock and surplus.

Community Reinvestment Act

The CRA generally requires insured depository institutions, including the Bank, to identify the communities they serve and to make loans and investments and provide services that meet the credit needs of those communities. Furthermore,communities and the CRA requires the FRB to evaluate the performance of the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary in helpingsuch depository institutions with respect to meet the credit needs of its communities. As a part of thethese CRA program, the banking subsidiary is subject to periodic examinations by the FRB, andobligations. Depository institutions must maintain comprehensive records of their CRA activities for this purpose. Duringpurposes of these examinations. The FRB must take into account the record of performance of depository institutions in meeting the credit needs of the entire community served, includinglow- and moderate-income neighborhoods. For purposes of CRA examinations, the FRB rates such institutions’ compliance with the CRA as “Outstanding,” “Satisfactory,” “Needs to Improve” or “Substantial Noncompliance.” Failure of an institution to receiveThe Bank must be well-capitalized, well-managed and maintain at least a “Satisfactory” CRA rating could inhibit such institution orfor the Bancorp to retain its holding company from undertaking certain activities, including engaging in activities permittedstatus as a financial holding company. Failure to meet these requirements could result in the FRB placing limitations or conditions on the Bancorp’s activities (and the commencement of new activities, including merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions) and could ultimately result in the loss of financial holding company understatus. The FRB conducted a regularly scheduled examination covering 2011 through 2013 to determine the GLBABancorp’s banking subsidiary’s compliance with the CRA. This CRA examination resulted in a rating of “Needs to Improve”. The Bank believes that the “Needs to Improve” rating reflects legacy issues that have been remediated during the intervening three years. While the Bank’s CRA rating is “Needs to Improve” the Bancorp and acquiringthe Bank face limitations and conditions on certain activities, including the commencement of new activities and merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions. The FRB must take into accountBank’s next CRA examination commenced during the recordfourth quarter of performance of banks in meeting the credit needs of the entire community served, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Fifth Third Bank received a “Satisfactory” CRA rating in its most recent CRA examination.2016.

Capital Generally

The FRB has established capital guidelines for BHCs and FHCs. The FRB, the Division and the FDIC have also issued regulations establishing capital requirements for banks. Failure to meet

capital requirements could subject the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary to a variety of restrictions and enforcement actions. In addition, as discussed previously, the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary must remain well capitalized and well managed for the Bancorp to retain its status as a FHC. See

Systemically Significant Companies and Capital

Title I of the “Regulatory Reform” sectionDFA created a new regulatory regime for large BHCs. U.S. BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, including Fifth Third, are subject to enhanced prudential standards and early remediation requirements under Title I. Title I of the DFA established a broad framework for identifying, applying heightened supervision and regulation to, and (as necessary) limiting the size and activities of systemically significant financial companies.

The DFA required the FRB to impose enhanced capital and risk-management standards on these firms and mandated the FRB to conduct annual stress tests on all BHCs with $50 billion or more in assets to determine whether they have adequate capital available to absorb losses in baseline, adverse, or severely adverse economic conditions. In November 2011, the FRB adopted final rules requiring BHCs with $50 billion or more in consolidated assets to submit capital plans to the FRB on an annual basis.

186  Fifth Third Bancorp


Under the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process, the FRB annually evaluates an institution’s capital adequacy, internal capital adequacy, assessment processes and capital distribution plans such as dividend payments and stock repurchases. Banks are also required to report certain data to the FRB on a quarterly basis to allow the FRB to monitor progress against the approved capital plans.

The CCAR process is intended to help ensure that BHCs have robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for each company’s unique risks and that permit continued operations during times of economic and financial stress. The mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected uses and sources of capital over a nine-quarter planning horizon, a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon, a discussion of any expected changes to the Bancorp’s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity, a detailed description of the Bancorp’s process for assessing capital adequacy and the Bancorp’s capital policy. The stress tests require increased involvement by boards of directors in stress testing and public disclosure of the results of both the FRB’s annual stress tests and a BHC’s annual supervisory stress tests, and semi-annual internal stress tests.

In 2014, the FRB amended its capital planning and stress testing rules to, among other things, generally limit a BHC’s ability to make quarterly capital distributions – that is, dividends and share repurchases – commencing April 1, 2015 if the amount of the bank’s actual cumulative quarterly capital issuances of instruments that qualify as regulatory capital are less than the bank had indicated in its submitted capital plan as to which it received anon-objection from the FRB. For example, if the BHC issued a smaller amount of additional informationcommon stock than it had stated in its capital plan, it would be required to reduce common dividends and/or the amount of common stock repurchases so that the dollar amount of capital distributions, net of the dollar amount of additional common stock issued (“net distributions”), is no greater than the dollar amount of net distributions relating to its common stock included in its capital plan, as measured on an aggregate basis beginning in the third quarter of the nine-quarter planning horizon through the end of the then current quarter. However, not raising sufficient amounts of common stock as planned would not affect distributions related to Additional Tier I Capital instruments and/ or Tier II Capital. These limitations also contain several important qualifications and exceptions, including that scheduled dividend payments on (as opposed to repurchases of) a BHC’s Additional Tier I Capital and Tier II Capital instruments are not restricted if the BHC fails to issue a sufficient amount of such instruments as planned, as well as provisions for certain de minimis excess distributions. BHCs with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more are required to submit their 2017 capital plan to the FRB by April 5, 2017.

In December of 2010 and revised in June of 2011, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) issued Basel III, a global regulatory framework, to enhance international capital standards. Basel III is designed to materially improve the quality of regulatory capital and introduces a new minimum common equity requirement. Basel III also raises the minimum capital requirements impactingand introduces capital conservation and countercyclical buffers to induce banking organizations to hold capital in excess of regulatory minimums. In addition, Basel III establishes an international leverage standard for internationally active banks.

In July of 2013, U.S. banking regulators approved the Bancorp.final enhanced regulatory capital rules (“Final Capital Rules”). The Final Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to BHCs and their depository institution subsidiaries as compared to the previous U.S. risk-based capital and leverage ratio rules, and thereby implement certain provisions of the DFA.

The Final Capital Rules, among other things, (i) introduce a new capital measure “Common Equity Tier I” (“CET1”), (ii) specify that Tier I capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier I capital” instruments meeting specified requirements, (iii) define CET1 narrowly by requiring that most adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital and (iv) expand the scope of the adjustments as compared to existing regulations. CET1 capital consists of common stock instruments that meet the eligibility criteria in the final rules, including; common stock and related surplus, net of treasury stock and retained earnings, certain minority interests and accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), if elected.

When fullyphased-in on January 1, 2019, the Final Capital Rules require banking organizations to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% CET1 ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0% upon full implementation), (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier I capital ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum Tier I capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation), (iii) a minimum ratio of total capital (that is, Tier I plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation) and (iv) a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier I capital to adjusted average consolidated assets.

Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer will face limitations on the payment of dividends, common stock repurchases and discretionary cash payments to executive officers based on the amount of the shortfall.

The Final Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets dependent upon future taxable income and significant investments innon-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Under the Final Capital Rules, the Bancorp made aone-time election (the“Opt-out Election”) to filter certain AOCI components, comparable to the treatment under the current general risk-based capital rule.

The Final Capital Rules were effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject tophase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions. Although not currently required, Fifth Third Bancorp believes the aforementioned capital ratios under the revised Final Capital Rules meet or exceed the ratios on a fullyphased-in basis. Refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A for an estimated CET1 capital ratio under the Basel III Final Rule (fullyphased-in) as of December 31, 2016.

187  Fifth Third Bancorp


In February 2014, the FRB approved a final rule implementing several heightened prudential requirements. The rules require BHCs with $10 billion or more in consolidated assets to establish risk committees and require BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets to comply with enhanced liquidity and overall risk management standards, includingcompany-run liquidity stress testing and a buffer of highly liquid assets based on projected funding needs for various time horizons, including 30, 60, and 90 days. These liquidity-related provisions are designed to be complementary, and in addition to the Final LCR Rule applicable to BHCs (as discussed below). Rules to implement two other components of the DFA’s enhanced prudential standards –single-counterparty credit limits and early remediation requirements– are still under consideration by the FRB. Fifth Third has conducted a self evaluation of all the requirements within the enhanced prudential standards, and believe the necessary steps have been taken to ensure compliance with all requirements regarding liquidity, risk exposures, and early remediation.

Liquidity Regulation

Liquidity risk management and supervision have become increasingly important since the financial crisis. On September 3, 2014, the FRB and other banking regulators adopted final rules (“Final LCR Rule”) implementing a U.S. version of the Basel Committee’s Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirement (“LCR”), which is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a30-day time horizon (or, if greater, 25% of its expected total cash outflow) under an acute liquidity stress scenario. The rules apply in modified form to banking organizations, such as the Bancorp, having $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets but less than $250 billion. The LCR is the ratio of an institution’s stock of HQLA (the numerator) over projected net cashout-flows over the30-day horizon (the denominator), in each case, as calculated pursuant to the Final LCR Rule. Once fullyphased-in, a subject institution must maintain an LCR equal to at least 100% in order to satisfy this regulatory requirement. Only specific classes of assets, including U.S. Treasuries, other U.S. government obligations and agency mortgaged-backed securities, qualify under the rule as HQLA, with classes of assets deemed relatively less liquid and/or subject to greater degree of credit risk subject to certain haircuts and caps for purposes of calculating the numerator under the Final LCR Rule. The total net cash outflows amount is determined under the rule by applying certain hypothetical outflow and inflow rates, which reflect certain standardized stressed assumptions, against the balances of the banking organization’s funding sources, obligations, transactions and assets over the30-day stress period. Inflows that can be included to offset outflows are limited to 75% of outflows (which effectively means that banking organizations must hold high-quality liquid assets equal to 25% of outflows even if outflows perfectly match inflows over the stress period). The total net cash outflow amount for the modified LCR applicable to the Bancorp is capped at 70% of the outflow rate that applies to the full LCR.

The initial compliance date for the modified LCR was January 31, 2016, with the requirement fullyphased-in on January 1, 2017. The LCR is a minimum requirement, and the FRB can impose additional liquidity requirements as a supervisory matter.

In addition, the Bancorp is also subject to the liquidity-related requirements of the enhanced prudential supervision rules adopted by the FRB under Section 165 of the DFA, as described above. As of December 31, 2016, the Bancorp’s modified LCR complied with the fullyphased-in LCR requirements which became effective on January 1, 2017.

In addition to the LCR, the Basel III framework also included a second standard, referred to as the net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”), which is designed to promote moremedium-and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banks over aone-year time horizon. In May, 2016, the federal banking agencies proposed an NSFR Rule. As proposed the most stringent requirements would apply to firms with $250 billion or more in assets or $10 billion or more inon-balance sheet foreign exposure. Holding companies with less than $250 billion, but more than $50 billion in assets and less than $10 billion inon-balance foreign exposure, such as the Bancorp, would be subject to a less stringent, modified NFSR requirement.

Privacy

The FRB, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies have adopted final guidelines (the “Guidelines) for safeguarding confidential, personal customer information. The Guidelines require each financial institution, under the supervision and ongoing oversight of its Board of Directors or an appropriate committee thereof, to create, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer. The Bancorp has adopted a customer information security program that has been approved by the Bancorp’s Board of Directors.

The GLBA requires financial institutions to implement policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about consumers tonon-affiliated third parties. In general, the statute requires explanations to consumers on policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of such nonpublic personal information, and, except as otherwise required by law, prohibits disclosing such information except as provided in the banking subsidiary’s policies and procedures. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary has implemented a privacy policy.

Anti-Money Laundering

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”), designed to deny terrorists and others the ability to obtain access to the United States financial system, has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act, as implemented by various federal regulatory agencies, requires financial institutions, including the Bancorp and its subsidiaries, to implement new policies and procedures or amend existing policies and procedures with respect to, among other matters, anti-money laundering, compliance, suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on customers. The Patriot Act and its underlying regulations also permit information sharing for counter-terrorist purposes between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions, subject to certain conditions, and require the FRB (and other federal banking agencies) to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering activities when considering applications filed under Section 3 of the BHCA or the Bank Merger Act. The Bancorp’s Board has approved policies and procedures that are believed to be compliant with the Patriot Act.

188  Fifth Third Bancorp


Exempt Brokerage Activities

The GLBA amended the federal securities laws to eliminate the blanket exceptions that banks traditionally have had from the definition of “broker” and “dealer.” The GLBA also required that there be certain transactional activities that would not be

174  Fifth Third Bancorp


“brokerage” “brokerage” activities, which banks could effect without having to register as a broker. In September 2007, the FRB and SEC approved Regulation R to govern bank securities activities. Various exemptions permit banks to conduct activities that would otherwise constitute brokerage activities under the securities laws. Those exemptions include conducting brokerage activities related to trust, fiduciary and similar services, certain services and also conducting a de minimis number of riskless principal transactions, certain asset-backed transactions and certain securities lending transactions. The Bancorp only conductsnon-exempt brokerage activities through its affiliated registered broker-dealer.

Regulatory Reform

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the DFA, which is aimed, in part, at accountability and transparency in the financial system and includes numerous provisions that apply to and/or could impact the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary. The DFA implements changes that, among other things, affect the oversight and supervision of financial institutions, provide for a new resolution procedure for large financial companies, create a new agency responsible for implementing and enforcing compliance with consumer financial laws, introduce more stringent regulatory capital requirements, effect significant changes in the regulation of over-the-counter derivatives, reform the regulation of credit rating agencies, implement changes to corporate governance and executive compensation practices, incorporate requirements on proprietary trading and investing in certain funds by financial institutions (known as the “Volcker Rule”), require registration of advisers to certain private funds, and effect significant changes in the securitization market. Not all the rules required or expected to be implemented under the DFA have been proposed or adopted, and certain of the rules that have been proposed or adopted under the DFA are subject to phase-in or transitional periods. The implication of the DFA for the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary continue to depend in large part upon the implementation of the legislation by the FRB and other agencies. Set forth below is a discussion of some of the major sections of the DFA and implementing regulations that have or could have a substantial impact on the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary. Due to the volume of regulations required by the DFA, not all proposed or final regulations that may have an impact on the Bancorp or its banking subsidiary are necessarily discussed.

Financial Stability Oversight Council

The DFA created the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), which is chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury and composed of expertise from various financial services regulators. The FSOC has responsibility for identifying risks and responding to emerging threats to financial stability. On March 15, 2012, the Department of Treasury issued an interim final rule to establish an assessment schedule for the collection of fees from BHCs and foreign banks with at least $50 billion in assets to cover the expenses of the Office of Financial Research and FSOC. The fees would also cover certain expenses incurred by the FDIC. The Bancorp paid approximately $1 million for the assessment periods from October 1, 2013 through March 31, 2015.

On August 16, 2013, the FRB also adopted a final rule to implement an assessment provision under the DFA equal to the expense and the FRB estimates are necessary or appropriate to supervise and regulate BHCs with $50 billion or more in assets.

The Bancorp paid approximately $3 million for the 2014 annual assessment period under the FRB’s rule.

Executive Compensation

The DFA provides for a say on pay for shareholders of all public companies. Under the DFA, each company must give its shareholders the opportunity to vote on the compensation of its executives at least once every three years. The DFA also adds disclosure and voting requirements for golden parachute compensation that is payable to named executive officers in connection with sale transactions. The SEC adopted rules finalizing these say on pay provisions in January 2011.

Pursuant to the DFA, in June 2012, the SEC adopted a final rule directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing classes of equity securities if a company’s compensation committee members are not independent. The rule also provides that a company’s compensation committee may only select a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor after taking into consideration factors to be identified by the SEC that affect the independence of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor.

The SEC is required under the DFA to issue rules obligating companies to disclose in proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders information that shows the relationship between executive compensation actually paid to their named executive officers and their financial performance, taking into account any change in the value of the shares of a company’s stock and dividends or distributions. The DFA also requires the SEC to propose rules requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the compensation of its chief executive officer to the median compensation of its employees. The SEC proposedadopted final rules implementing the pay ratio provisions in September 2013.August 2015. For a registrant with a fiscal year ending on December 31, such as Bancorp, the pay ratio will be required as part of its executive compensation disclosure in proxy statements or Form10-Ks filed starting in 2018.

The DFA provides that the SEC must issue rules directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing any security of a company unless the company develops and implements a policy providing for disclosure of the policy of the company on incentive-based compensation that is based on financial information required to be reported under the securities laws and that, in the event the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the company will recover from any current or former executive officer of the company who received incentive-based compensation during the three-year period preceding the date on which the company is required to prepare the restatement based on the erroneous data, any exceptional compensation above what would have been paid under the restatement.

The DFA requires the SEC to adopt a rule to require that each company disclose in the proxy materials for its annual meetings whether an employee or board member is permitted to purchase financial instruments designed to hedge or offset decreases in the market value of equity securities granted as compensation or otherwise held by the employee or board member.

In June 2016, the SEC and the federal banking agencies issued a proposed rule to implement the incentive-based compensation provisions of section 956 of the DFA. The proposal would establish new requirements for incentive-based compensation at institutions with assets of at least $1 billion.

Corporate Governance

The DFA clarifies that the SEC may, but is not required to promulgate rules that would require that a company’s proxy materials include a nominee for the board of directors submitted by a shareholder. Although the SEC promulgated rules to accomplish this, these rules were invalidated by a federal appeals court decision. The SEC has said that they will not challenge the

175  Fifth Third Bancorp


ruling, but has not ruled out the possibility that new rules could be proposed.

The DFA requires stock exchanges to have rules prohibiting their members from voting securities that they do not beneficially own (unless they have received voting instructions from the beneficial owner) with respect to the election of a member of the board of directors (other than an uncontested election of directors of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940), executive compensation or any other significant matter, as determined by the SEC by rule.

Credit Ratings

The DFA includes a number of provisions that are targeted at improving the reliability of credit ratings. In August of 2014 the SEC adopted new requirements for credit rating agencies to enhance governance, protect against conflicts of interest, and increase transparency to improve the quality of credit rating agency accountability.

Consumer Issues

The DFA created a new bureau, the CFPB, which has the authority to implement regulations pursuant to numerous consumer protection laws and has supervisory authority, including the power to conduct examination and take enforcement actions, with respect to depository institutions with more than $10 billion in consolidated assets. The CFPB also has authority, with respect to consumer financial services to, among other things, restrict unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices, enforce laws that prohibit discrimination and unfair treatment and to require certain consumer disclosures.

Debit Card Interchange Fees

The DFA provides for a set of new rules requiring that interchange transaction fees for electric debit transactions be “reasonable” and proportional to certain costs associated with processing the transactions. The FRB was given authority to, among other things, establish standards for assessing whether interchange fees are reasonable and proportional. In June 2011, the FRB issued a final rule establishing certain standards and prohibitions pursuant to the DFA, including establishing standards for debit card interchange fees and allowing for an upward adjustment if the issuer develops and implements policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent fraud. The provisions regarding debit card interchange fees and the fraud adjustment became effective October 1, 2011. The rules impose requirements on the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary and may negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.

189  Fifth Third Bancorp


On July 31, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs in a case challenging certain provisions of the FRB’s rule concerning electronic debit card transaction fees and network exclusivity arrangements (the “Current Rule”) that were adopted to implement Section 1075 of the DFA, known as the Durbin Amendment. The Court held that, in adopting the Current Rule, the FRB violated the Durbin Amendment’s provisions concerning which costs are allowed to be taken into account for purposes of setting fees that are reasonable and proportional to the costs incurred by the issuer and therefore the Current Rule’s maximum permissible fees were too high. In addition, the Court held that the Current Rule’s networknon-exclusivity provisions concerning unaffiliated payment networks for debit cards also violated the Durbin Amendment. The Court vacated the Current Rule, but stayed its ruling to provide the FRB an opportunity to replace the invalidated portions. The FRB appealed this decision and on March 21, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the

District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. The merchants have filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, on January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the Circuit Court reversal, thereby largely upholding the Current Rule and substantially reducing uncertainty surrounding debit card interchange fees the Bancorp is permitted to charge. Refer to the Noninterest Income subsection of the Statements of Income Analysis section of MD&A for further information regarding the Bancorp’s debit card interchange revenue.

FDIC Matters and Resolution Planning

Title II of the DFA creates an orderly liquidation process that the FDIC can employ for failing systemically important financial companies. Additionally, the DFA also codifies many of the temporary changes that had already been implemented, such as permanently increasing the amount of deposit insurance to $250,000.

In January 2012, the FDIC issued a final rule that requires an insured depository institution with $50 billion or more in total assets to submit periodic contingency plans to the FDIC for resolution in the event of the institution’s failure. The rule became effective in January 2012; however, submission of plans are staggered over a period of time. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to this rule and submitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of December 31, 2014.2015.

In October 2011, the FRB and FDIC issued a final rule implementing the resolution planning requirements of Section 165(d) of the DFA. The final rule requires BHCs with assets of $50 billion or more and nonbank financial firms designated by FSOC for supervision by the FRB to annually submit resolution plans to the FDIC and FRB. Each plan shall describe the company’s strategy for rapid and orderly resolution in bankruptcy during times of financial distress.    Under the final rule, companies must submit their initial resolution plans on a staggered basis. The Bancorp submitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of December 31, 2014.2015. In August 2016, the FDIC and the FRB announced that 38 firms, including Fifth Third, will be required to submit their next resolutions by December 31, 2017.

Proprietary TradingLiquidity Regulation

Liquidity risk management and Investing in Certain Funds

The DFA sets forth new restrictions onsupervision have become increasingly important since the financial crisis. On September 3, 2014, the FRB and other banking organizations’ abilityregulators adopted final rules (“Final LCR Rule”) implementing a U.S. version of the Basel Committee’s Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirement (“LCR”), which is designed to engage in proprietary trading and sponsors of or invest in private equity and hedge funds (the “Volcker Rule”). The final regulations implementingensure that the Volcker Rule (“Final Rules”) were adopted on December 10, 2013. The Volcker Rule generally prohibits any banking entity from (i) engagingmaintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a30-day time horizon (or, if greater, 25% of its expected total cash outflow) under an acute liquidity stress scenario. The rules apply in short-term proprietary trading for its own account and (ii) sponsoringmodified form to banking organizations, such as the Bancorp, having $50 billion or acquiring any ownership interestmore in total consolidated assets but less than $250 billion. The LCR is the ratio of an institution’s stock of HQLA (the numerator) over projected net cashout-flows over the30-day horizon (the denominator), in each case, as calculated pursuant to the Final LCR Rule. Once fullyphased-in,a private equity or hedge fund. The Volcker Rule and Final Rules contain a numbersubject institution must maintain an LCR equal to at least 100% in order to satisfy this regulatory requirement. Only specific classes of exceptions. The Volcker Rule permits transactions in the securities of theassets, including U.S. Treasuries, other U.S. government obligations and its agencies,agency mortgaged-backed securities, qualify under the rule as HQLA, with classes of assets deemed relatively less liquid and/or subject to greater degree of credit risk subject to certain government-sponsored enterpriseshaircuts and states and their political subdivisions, as well as certain investments in small business investment companies. Transactions on behalfcaps for purposes of customers and in connection with certain underwriting and market making activities, as well as risk-mitigating hedging activities and certain foreign banking activities are also permitted. The Final Rules exclude certain funds fromcalculating the prohibition on fund ownership and sponsorship including wholly-owned subsidiaries, joint ventures, and acquisitions vehicles, as well as SEC registered investment companies.De minimis ownership of private equity or hedge funds is also permittednumerator under the Final Rules. LCR Rule. The total net cash outflows amount is determined under the rule by applying certain hypothetical outflow and inflow rates, which reflect certain standardized stressed assumptions, against the balances of the banking organization’s funding sources, obligations, transactions and assets over the30-day stress period. Inflows that can be included to offset outflows are limited to 75% of outflows (which effectively means that banking organizations must hold high-quality liquid assets equal to 25% of outflows even if outflows perfectly match inflows over the stress period). The total net cash outflow amount for the modified LCR applicable to the Bancorp is capped at 70% of the outflow rate that applies to the full LCR.

The initial compliance date for the modified LCR was January 31, 2016, with the requirement fullyphased-in on January 1, 2017. The LCR is a minimum requirement, and the FRB can impose additional liquidity requirements as a supervisory matter.

In addition, the Bancorp is also subject to the liquidity-related requirements of the enhanced prudential supervision rules adopted by the FRB under Section 165 of the DFA, as described above. As of December 31, 2016, the Bancorp’s modified LCR complied with the fullyphased-in LCR requirements which became effective on January 1, 2017.

In addition to the general prohibition on sponsorshipLCR, the Basel III framework also included a second standard, referred to as the net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”), which is designed to promote moremedium-and long-term funding of the assets and investment,activities of banks over aone-year time horizon. In May, 2016, the Volcker rule contains additionalfederal banking agencies proposed an NSFR Rule. As proposed the most stringent requirements applicablewould apply to firms with $250 billion or more in assets or $10 billion or more inon-balance sheet foreign exposure. Holding companies with less than $250 billion, but more than $50 billion in assets and less than $10 billion inon-balance foreign exposure, such as the Bancorp, would be subject to a less stringent, modified NFSR requirement.

Privacy

The FRB, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies have adopted final guidelines (the “Guidelines) for safeguarding confidential, personal customer information. The Guidelines require each financial institution, under the supervision and ongoing oversight of its Board of Directors or an appropriate committee thereof, to create, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any private equity or hedge fundcustomer. The Bancorp has adopted a customer information security program that is sponsoredhas been approved by the Bancorp’s Board of Directors.

The GLBA requires financial institutions to implement policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about consumers tonon-affiliated third parties. In general, the statute requires explanations to consumers on policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of such nonpublic personal information, and, except as otherwise required by law, prohibits disclosing such information except as provided in the banking entitysubsidiary’s policies and procedures. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary has implemented a privacy policy.

Anti-Money Laundering

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”), designed to deny terrorists and others the ability to obtain access to the United States financial system, has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act, as implemented by various federal regulatory agencies, requires financial institutions, including the Bancorp and its subsidiaries, to implement new policies and procedures or amend existing policies and procedures with respect to, among other matters, anti-money laundering, compliance, suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on customers. The Patriot Act and its underlying regulations also permit information sharing for counter-terrorist purposes between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions, subject to certain conditions, and require the FRB (and other federal banking agencies) to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering activities when considering applications filed under Section 3 of the BHCA or the Bank Merger Act. The Bancorp’s Board has approved policies and procedures that are believed to be compliant with the Patriot Act.

 

 

176188  Fifth Third Bancorp


Exempt Brokerage Activities

The GLBA amended the federal securities laws to eliminate the blanket exceptions that banks traditionally have had from the definition of “broker” and “dealer.” The GLBA also required that there be certain transactional activities that would not be “brokerage” activities, which it servesbanks could effect without having to register as investment manager or investment advisor.a broker. In September 2007, the FRB and SEC approved Regulation R to govern bank securities activities. Various exemptions permit banks to conduct activities that would otherwise constitute brokerage activities under the securities laws. Those exemptions include conducting brokerage activities related to trust, fiduciary and similar services, certain services and also conducting a de minimis number of riskless principal transactions, certain asset-backed transactions and certain securities lending transactions. The Bancorp only conductsnon-exempt brokerage activities through its affiliated registered broker-dealer.

Financial Stability Oversight Council

The DFA created the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), which is chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury and composed of expertise from various financial services regulators. The FSOC has responsibility for identifying risks and responding to emerging threats to financial stability.

Executive Compensation

The DFA provides for a say on pay for shareholders of all public companies. Under the DFA, each company must give its shareholders the opportunity to vote on the compensation of its executives at least once every three years. The DFA also adds disclosure and voting requirements for golden parachute compensation that is payable to named executive officers in connection with sale transactions. The SEC adopted rules finalizing these say on pay provisions in January 2011.

Pursuant to the DFA, in June 2012, the SEC adopted a final rule directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing classes of equity securities if a company’s compensation committee members are not independent. The rule also provides that a company’s compensation committee may only select a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor after taking into consideration factors to be identified by the SEC that affect the independence of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor.

The SEC is required under the Final RulesDFA to demonstrateissue rules obligating companies to disclose in proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders information that it has a Volcker Rule compliance program. In connection withshows the issuancerelationship between executive compensation actually paid to their named executive officers and their financial performance, taking into account any change in the value of the Final Rules,shares of a company’s stock and dividends or distributions. The DFA also requires the Federal Reserve extendedSEC to propose rules requiring companies to disclose the conformance period generally until July 21,ratio of the compensation of its chief executive officer to the median compensation of its employees. The SEC adopted final rules implementing the pay ratio provisions in August 2015. The Final Rules became effective April 2014 and in December 2014, the FRB extended the compliance period through July 2016 for investments in and relationshipsFor a registrant with such covered funds that were in place prior toa fiscal year ending on December 31, 2013,such as Bancorp, the pay ratio will be required as part of its executive compensation disclosure in proxy statements or Form10-Ks filed starting in 2018.

The DFA provides that the SEC must issue rules directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing any security of a company unless the company develops and indicatedimplements a policy providing for disclosure of the policy of the company on incentive-based compensation that it intendsis based on financial information required to further extendbe reported under the compliancesecurities laws and that, in the event the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the company will recover from any current or former executive officer of the company who received incentive-based compensation during the three-year period preceding the date on which the company is required to prepare the restatement based on the erroneous data, any exceptional compensation above what would have been paid under the restatement.

The DFA requires the SEC to adopt a rule to require that each company disclose in the proxy materials for such investments through July 2017. Further,its annual meetings whether an employee or board member is permitted to purchase financial instruments designed to hedge or offset decreases in the market value of equity securities granted as compensation or otherwise held by the employee or board member.

In June 2016, the SEC and the federal banking agencies issued a proposed rule to implement the incentive-based compensation provisions of section 956 of the DFA. The proposal would establish new requirements for incentive-based compensation at institutions with assets of at least $1 billion.

Corporate Governance

The DFA clarifies that the SEC may, but is not required to promulgate rules that would require that a company’s proxy materials include a nominee for the board of directors submitted by a shareholder. Although the SEC promulgated rules to accomplish this, these rules were invalidated by a federal appeals court decision. The SEC has said that they will not challenge the ruling, but has not ruled out the possibility that new rules could be proposed.

The DFA requires stock exchanges to have rules prohibiting their members from voting securities that they do not beneficially own (unless they have received voting instructions from the beneficial owner) with respect to covered fundsthe election of a member of the board of directors (other than an uncontested election of directors of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940), executive compensation or any other significant matter, as determined by the SEC by rule.

Debit Card Interchange Fees

The DFA provides for a set of new rules requiring that interchange transaction fees for electric debit transactions be “reasonable” and proportional to certain costs associated with processing the transactions. The FRB was given authority to, among other things, establish standards for assessing whether interchange fees are “illiquid funds”,reasonable and proportional. In June 2011, the FRB hasissued a final rule establishing certain standards and prohibitions pursuant to the authorityDFA, including establishing standards for debit card interchange fees and allowing for an upward adjustment if the issuer develops and implements policies and procedures reasonably designed to grant up to five more years forprevent fraud. The provisions regarding debit card interchange fees and the fraud adjustment became effective October 1, 2011. The rules impose requirements on the Bancorp to conform to the final Volcker Rule with respect to such illiquid funds.

Derivatives

Title VII of the DFA includes measures to broaden the scope of derivative instruments subject to regulation by requiring clearing and exchange trading of certain derivatives, imposing new capital and margin requirements for certain market participants and imposing position limits on certain over-the-counter derivatives. In 2014, Fifth Third Bank registered as a swap dealer with the CFTC and became subject to new substantive requirements, including real time trade reporting and robust record keeping requirements, business conduct requirements (including daily valuations, disclosure of material risks associated with swaps and disclosure of material incentives and conflicts of interest), and mandatory clearing and exchange trading of all standardized swaps designated by the relevant regulatory agencies as required to be cleared. As with the Volcker Rule, Fifth Third Bank is required to demonstrate that it has a satisfactory compliance program to monitor the activities of the swap dealer and comply with the applicable regulations. Although the ultimate impact of the regulatory changes will depend on the promulgation of all final regulations, Fifth Third Bank’s derivatives business will likely be further subject to additional substantive requirements including margin requirements in excess of current market practice and certain capital requirements. These requirements may impose additional operational and compliance costs on usits banking subsidiary and may require us to restructure certain businesses and negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.

Interstate Bank Branching

The DFA includes

189  Fifth Third Bancorp


On July 31, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs in a case challenging certain provisions permitting national and insured state banks to engage inde novo interstate branching if, under the laws of the state whereFRB’s rule concerning electronic debit card transaction fees and network exclusivity arrangements (the “Current Rule”) that were adopted to implement Section 1075 of the new branch isDFA, known as the Durbin Amendment. The Court held that, in adopting the Current Rule, the FRB violated the Durbin Amendment’s provisions concerning which costs are allowed to be established,taken into account for purposes of setting fees that are reasonable and proportional to the costs incurred by the issuer and therefore the Current Rule’s maximum permissible fees were too high. In addition, the Court held that the Current Rule’s networknon-exclusivity provisions concerning unaffiliated payment networks for debit cards also violated the Durbin Amendment. The Court vacated the Current Rule, but stayed its ruling to provide the FRB an opportunity to replace the invalidated portions. The FRB appealed this decision and on March 21, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. The merchants have filed a state bank chartered in that state would bepetition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, on January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the Circuit Court reversal, thereby largely upholding the Current Rule and substantially reducing uncertainty surrounding debit card interchange fees the Bancorp is permitted to establish a branch.charge.

Systemically Significant CompaniesFDIC Matters and CapitalResolution Planning

Title III of the DFA creates an orderly liquidation process that the FDIC can employ for failing systemically important financial companies. Additionally, the DFA also codifies many of the temporary changes that had already been implemented, such as permanently increasing the amount of deposit insurance to $250,000.

In January 2012, the FDIC issued a new regulatory regime for large BHCs. U.S. BHCsfinal rule that requires an insured depository institution with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets including Fifth Third, areto submit periodic contingency plans to the FDIC for resolution in the event of the institution’s failure. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to enhanced prudential standardsthis rule and early remediation requirements under Title I. Title Isubmitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of the DFA establishes a broad framework for identifying, applying heightened supervision and regulation to, and (as necessary) limiting the size and activities of systemically significant financial companies.December 31, 2015.

The DFA requires the FRB to impose enhanced capital and risk-management standards on these firms and mandates the FRB to conduct annual stress tests on all BHCs with $50 billion or more in assets to determine whether they have adequate capital available to absorb losses in baseline, adverse, or severely adverse economic conditions. In NovemberOctober 2011, the FRB adoptedand FDIC issued a final

rules requiring rule implementing the resolution planning requirements of Section 165(d) of the DFA. The final rule requires BHCs with $50 billion or more in consolidated assets to submit capital plans to the FRB on an annual basis. Under the final rules, the FRB annually will evaluate an institution’s capital adequacy, internal capital adequacy, assessment processes and capital distribution plans such as dividend payments and stock repurchases. Banks are also required to report certain data to the FRB on a quarterly basis to allow the FRB to monitor progress against the approved capital plans.

The CCAR process is intended to help ensure that BHCs have robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for each company’s unique risks and that permit continued operations during times of economic and financial stress. The 2015 CCAR required BHCs with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more and nonbank financial firms designated by FSOC for supervision by the FRB to annually submit a capital planresolution plans to the FRB by January 5, 2015. The mandatory elementsFDIC and FRB. Each plan shall describe the company’s strategy for rapid and orderly resolution in bankruptcy during times of financial distress.    Under the capital plan are an assessment of the expected uses and sources of capital overfinal rule, companies must submit their initial resolution plans on a nine-quarter planning horizon, a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon, a discussion of any expected changes to the Bancorp’s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity, a detailed description of the Bancorp’s process for assessing capital adequacy and the Bancorp’s capital policy. The stress tests require increased involvement by boards of directors in stress testing and public disclosure of the results of both the FRB’s annual stress tests and a BHC’s annual supervisory stress tests, and semi-annual internal stress tests.staggered basis. The Bancorp submitted its capitalmost recent resolution plan along with all supporting materials,pursuant to the FRB on January 5, 2015. The FRB will release the results of the supervisory stress tests on March 5, 2015 and the related results from the 2015 CCAR on March 11, 2015.

The FRB recently amended its capital planning and stress testing rules to, among other things, generally limit a BHC’s ability to make quarterly capital distributions – that is, dividends and share repurchases – commencing April 1, 2015 if the amount of the bank’s actual cumulative quarterly capital issuances of instruments that qualify as regulatory capital are less than the bank had indicated in its submitted capital plan as to which it received a non-objection from the FRB. For example, if the BHC issued a smaller amount of additional common stock than it had stated in its capital plan, it would be required to reduce common dividends and/or the amount of common stock repurchases so that the dollar amount of capital distributions, net of the dollar amount of additional common stock issued (“net distributions”), is no greater than the dollar amount of net distributions relating to its common stock included in its capital plan, as measured on an aggregate basis beginning in the third quarter of the nine-quarter planning horizon through the end of the then current quarter. However, not raising sufficient amounts of common stock as planned would not affect distributions related to Additional Tier I Capital instruments and/ or Tier II Capital. These limitations also contain several important qualifications and exceptions, including that scheduled dividend payments on (as opposed to repurchases of) a BHC’s Additional Tier I Capital and Tier II Capital instruments are not restricted if the BHC fails to issue a sufficient amount of such instruments as planned, as well as provisions for certainde minimis excess distributions.

In December of 2010 and revised in June of 2011, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) issued Basel III, a global regulatory framework, to enhance international capital standards. Basel III is designed to materially improve the quality of regulatory capital and introduces a new minimum common equity requirement. Basel III also raises the minimum capital requirements and introduces capital

177  Fifth Third Bancorp


conservation and countercyclical buffers to induce banking organizations to hold capital in excess of regulatory minimums. In addition, Basel III establishes an international leverage standard for internationally active banks.

In July of 2013, U.S. banking regulators approved the final enhanced regulatory capital rules (“Final Capital Rules”), which included modifications to the proposed rules. The Final Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to BHCs and their depository institution subsidiaries as compared to the previous U.S. risk-based capital and leverage ratio rules, and thereby implement certain provisions of the DFA.

The Final Capital Rules, among other things, (i) introduce a new capital measure “Common Equity Tier I” (“CET1”), (ii) specify that Tier I capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier I capital” instruments meeting specified requirements, (iii) define CET1 narrowly by requiring that most adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital and (iv) expand the scope of the adjustments as compared to existing regulations. CET1 capital consists of common stock instruments that meet the eligibility criteria in the final rules, including; common stock and related surplus, net of treasury stock and retained earnings, certain minority interests and accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), if elected.

When fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, the Final Capital Rules require banking organizations to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% CET1 ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0% upon full implementation), (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier I capital ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum Tier I capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation), (iii) a minimum ratio of total capital (that is, Tier I plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation) and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier I capital to adjusted average consolidated assets.

Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer will face limitations on the payment of dividends, common stock repurchases and discretionary cash payments to executive officers based on the amount of the shortfall.

The Final Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets dependent upon future taxable income and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Under current capital standards, the effects of AOCI items included in capital are excluded for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios. Under the Final Capital Rules, Bancorp has a one-time election (the “Opt-out Election”) to filter certain AOCI components, comparable to the treatment under the current general risk-based capital rule.

The Final Capital Rules were effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions. Although not currently required, Fifth Third Bancorp believes the aforementioned capital

ratios under the revised Final Capital Rules meet or exceed the ratios on a fully phased in basis. Refer to the Non-GAAP section of MD&A for an estimate of the Basel III CET1 ratiothis rule as of December 31, 2014.

2015. In February 2014,August 2016, the FDIC and the FRB approved a final rule implementing several heightened prudential requirements. Beginning in 2015, the rules require BHCs with $10 billion or more in consolidated assets to establish risk committees and require BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets to comply with enhanced liquidity and overall risk management standards,announced that 38 firms, including company-run liquidity stress testing and a buffer of highly liquid assets based on projected funding needs for various time horizons, including 30, 60, and 90 days. These liquidity-related provisions are designed to be complementary, and in addition to the Final LCR Rule applicable to BHCs (as discussed below). Rules to implement two other components of the DFA’s enhanced prudential standards –single-counterparty credit limits and early remediation requirements– are still under consideration by the FRB. Fifth Third, has conducted a self evaluation of all the requirements within the enhanced prudential standards, and believe the necessary steps have been takenwill be required to ensure compliance with all requirements regarding liquidity, risk exposures, and early remediation.submit their next resolutions by December 31, 2017.

Liquidity Regulation

Liquidity risk management and supervision have become increasingly important since the financial crisis. On September 3, 2014, the FRB and other banking regulators adopted final rules (“Final LCR Rule”) implementing a U.S. version of the Basel Committee’s Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirement (“LCR”), which is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a30-day time horizon (or, if greater, 25% of its expected total cash outflow) under an acute liquidity stress scenario. The rules apply in modified form to banking organizations, such as the Bancorp, having $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets but less than $250 billion. The LCR is the ratio of an institution’s stock of HQLA (the numerator) over projected net cashout-flows over the30-day horizon (the denominator), in each case, as calculated pursuant to the Final LCR Rule. Once fullyphased-in, a subject institution must maintain an LCR equal to at least 100% in order to satisfy this regulatory requirement. Only specific classes of assets, including U.S. Treasuries, other U.S. government obligations and agency mortgaged-backed securities, qualify under the rule as HQLA, with classes of assets deemed relatively less liquid and/or subject to greater degree of credit risk subject to certain haircuts and caps for purposes of calculating the numerator under the Final LCR Rule. The total net cash outflows amount is determined under the rule by applying certain hypothetical outflow and inflow rates, which reflect certain standardized stressed assumptions, against the balances of the banking organization’s funding sources, obligations, transactions and assets over the30-day stress period. Inflows that can be included to offset outflows are limited to 75% of outflows (which effectively means that banking organizations must hold high-quality liquid assets equal to 25% of outflows even if outflows perfectly match inflows over the stress period). The total net cash outflow amount for the modified LCR applicable to the Bancorp is capped at 70% of the outflow rate that applies to the full LCR.

The initial compliance date for the modified LCR will bewas January 31, 2016, with the requirement fullyphased-in by on January 1, 2017. The LCR is a minimum requirement, and the FRB can impose additional liquidity requirements as a supervisory matter.

178  Fifth Third Bancorp


In addition, the Bancorp is also subject to the liquidity-related requirements of the enhanced prudential supervision rules adopted by the FRB under Section 165 of the DFA, as described above. As of December 31, 20142016, the Bancorp’s internally calculatedmodified LCR would have complied with the fully phased inphased-in LCR requirements which will becomebecame effective in 2016 as outlined in the final rule.on January 1, 2017.

In addition to the LCR, the Basel III framework also included a second standard, referred to as the net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”), which is designed to promote moremedium-and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banks over aone-year time horizon. AlthoughIn May, 2016, the Basel Committee finalized its formulation of the NSFR in 2014, the U.S.federal banking agencies have not yet proposed an NSFR Rule. As proposed the most stringent requirements would apply to firms with $250 billion or more in assets or $10 billion or more inon-balance sheet foreign exposure. Holding companies with less than $250 billion, but more than $50 billion in assets and less than $10 billion inon-balance foreign exposure, such as the Bancorp, would be subject to a less stringent, modified NFSR requirement.

Privacy

The FRB, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies have adopted final guidelines (the “Guidelines) for applicationsafeguarding confidential, personal customer information. The Guidelines require each financial institution, under the supervision and ongoing oversight of its Board of Directors or an appropriate committee thereof, to U.S.create, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer. The Bancorp has adopted a customer information security program that has been approved by the Bancorp’s Board of Directors.

The GLBA requires financial institutions to implement policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about consumers tonon-affiliated third parties. In general, the statute requires explanations to consumers on policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of such nonpublic personal information, and, except as otherwise required by law, prohibits disclosing such information except as provided in the banking organizationssubsidiary’s policies and procedures. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary has implemented a privacy policy.

Anti-Money Laundering

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”), designed to deny terrorists and others the ability to obtain access to the United States financial system, has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act, as implemented by various federal regulatory agencies, requires financial institutions, including the Bancorp and its subsidiaries, to implement new policies and procedures or addressedamend existing policies and procedures with respect to, among other matters, anti-money laundering, compliance, suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on customers. The Patriot Act and its underlying regulations also permit information sharing for counter-terrorist purposes between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions, subject to certain conditions, and require the scopeFRB (and other federal banking agencies) to evaluate the effectiveness of banking organizationsan applicant in combating money laundering activities when considering applications filed under Section 3 of the BHCA or the Bank Merger Act. The Bancorp’s Board has approved policies and procedures that are believed to which it will apply. The Basel Committee’s final NSFR document states thatbe compliant with the NSFR applies to internationally active banks, as did its final LCR document as to that ratio.Patriot Act.

 

 

179188  Fifth Third Bancorp


Exempt Brokerage Activities

The GLBA amended the federal securities laws to eliminate the blanket exceptions that banks traditionally have had from the definition of “broker” and “dealer.” The GLBA also required that there be certain transactional activities that would not be “brokerage” activities, which banks could effect without having to register as a broker. In September 2007, the FRB and SEC approved Regulation R to govern bank securities activities. Various exemptions permit banks to conduct activities that would otherwise constitute brokerage activities under the securities laws. Those exemptions include conducting brokerage activities related to trust, fiduciary and similar services, certain services and also conducting a de minimis number of riskless principal transactions, certain asset-backed transactions and certain securities lending transactions. The Bancorp only conductsnon-exempt brokerage activities through its affiliated registered broker-dealer.

Financial Stability Oversight Council

The DFA created the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), which is chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury and composed of expertise from various financial services regulators. The FSOC has responsibility for identifying risks and responding to emerging threats to financial stability.

Executive Compensation

The DFA provides for a say on pay for shareholders of all public companies. Under the DFA, each company must give its shareholders the opportunity to vote on the compensation of its executives at least once every three years. The DFA also adds disclosure and voting requirements for golden parachute compensation that is payable to named executive officers in connection with sale transactions. The SEC adopted rules finalizing these say on pay provisions in January 2011.

Pursuant to the DFA, in June 2012, the SEC adopted a final rule directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing classes of equity securities if a company’s compensation committee members are not independent. The rule also provides that a company’s compensation committee may only select a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor after taking into consideration factors to be identified by the SEC that affect the independence of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor.

The SEC is required under the DFA to issue rules obligating companies to disclose in proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders information that shows the relationship between executive compensation actually paid to their named executive officers and their financial performance, taking into account any change in the value of the shares of a company’s stock and dividends or distributions. The DFA also requires the SEC to propose rules requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the compensation of its chief executive officer to the median compensation of its employees. The SEC adopted final rules implementing the pay ratio provisions in August 2015. For a registrant with a fiscal year ending on December 31, such as Bancorp, the pay ratio will be required as part of its executive compensation disclosure in proxy statements or Form10-Ks filed starting in 2018.

The DFA provides that the SEC must issue rules directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing any security of a company unless the company develops and implements a policy providing for disclosure of the policy of the company on incentive-based compensation that is based on financial information required to be reported under the securities laws and that, in the event the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the company will recover from any current or former executive officer of the company who received incentive-based compensation during the three-year period preceding the date on which the company is required to prepare the restatement based on the erroneous data, any exceptional compensation above what would have been paid under the restatement.

The DFA requires the SEC to adopt a rule to require that each company disclose in the proxy materials for its annual meetings whether an employee or board member is permitted to purchase financial instruments designed to hedge or offset decreases in the market value of equity securities granted as compensation or otherwise held by the employee or board member.

In June 2016, the SEC and the federal banking agencies issued a proposed rule to implement the incentive-based compensation provisions of section 956 of the DFA. The proposal would establish new requirements for incentive-based compensation at institutions with assets of at least $1 billion.

Corporate Governance

The DFA clarifies that the SEC may, but is not required to promulgate rules that would require that a company’s proxy materials include a nominee for the board of directors submitted by a shareholder. Although the SEC promulgated rules to accomplish this, these rules were invalidated by a federal appeals court decision. The SEC has said that they will not challenge the ruling, but has not ruled out the possibility that new rules could be proposed.

The DFA requires stock exchanges to have rules prohibiting their members from voting securities that they do not beneficially own (unless they have received voting instructions from the beneficial owner) with respect to the election of a member of the board of directors (other than an uncontested election of directors of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940), executive compensation or any other significant matter, as determined by the SEC by rule.

Debit Card Interchange Fees

The DFA provides for a set of new rules requiring that interchange transaction fees for electric debit transactions be “reasonable” and proportional to certain costs associated with processing the transactions. The FRB was given authority to, among other things, establish standards for assessing whether interchange fees are reasonable and proportional. In June 2011, the FRB issued a final rule establishing certain standards and prohibitions pursuant to the DFA, including establishing standards for debit card interchange fees and allowing for an upward adjustment if the issuer develops and implements policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent fraud. The provisions regarding debit card interchange fees and the fraud adjustment became effective October 1, 2011. The rules impose requirements on the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary and may negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.

189  Fifth Third Bancorp


On July 31, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs in a case challenging certain provisions of the FRB’s rule concerning electronic debit card transaction fees and network exclusivity arrangements (the “Current Rule”) that were adopted to implement Section 1075 of the DFA, known as the Durbin Amendment. The Court held that, in adopting the Current Rule, the FRB violated the Durbin Amendment’s provisions concerning which costs are allowed to be taken into account for purposes of setting fees that are reasonable and proportional to the costs incurred by the issuer and therefore the Current Rule’s maximum permissible fees were too high. In addition, the Court held that the Current Rule’s networknon-exclusivity provisions concerning unaffiliated payment networks for debit cards also violated the Durbin Amendment. The Court vacated the Current Rule, but stayed its ruling to provide the FRB an opportunity to replace the invalidated portions. The FRB appealed this decision and on March 21, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. The merchants have filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, on January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the Circuit Court reversal, thereby largely upholding the Current Rule and substantially reducing uncertainty surrounding debit card interchange fees the Bancorp is permitted to charge.

FDIC Matters and Resolution Planning

Title II of the DFA creates an orderly liquidation process that the FDIC can employ for failing systemically important financial companies. Additionally, the DFA also codifies many of the temporary changes that had already been implemented, such as permanently increasing the amount of deposit insurance to $250,000.

In January 2012, the FDIC issued a final rule that requires an insured depository institution with $50 billion or more in total assets to submit periodic contingency plans to the FDIC for resolution in the event of the institution’s failure. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to this rule and submitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of December 31, 2015.

In October 2011, the FRB and FDIC issued a final rule implementing the resolution planning requirements of Section 165(d) of the DFA. The final rule requires BHCs with assets of $50 billion or more and nonbank financial firms designated by FSOC for supervision by the FRB to annually submit resolution plans to the FDIC and FRB. Each plan shall describe the company’s strategy for rapid and orderly resolution in bankruptcy during times of financial distress.    Under the final rule, companies must submit their initial resolution plans on a staggered basis. The Bancorp submitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of December 31, 2015. In August 2016, the FDIC and the FRB announced that 38 firms, including Fifth Third, will be required to submit their next resolutions by December 31, 2017.

Proprietary Trading and Investing in Certain Funds

The DFA sets forth new restrictions on banking organizations’ ability to engage in proprietary trading and sponsors of or invest in private equity and hedge funds (the “Volcker Rule”). The final regulations implementing the Volcker Rule (“Final Rules”) were adopted on December 10, 2013. The Volcker Rule generally prohibits any banking entity from (i) engaging in short-term proprietary trading for its own account and (ii) sponsoring or

acquiring any ownership interest in a private equity or hedge fund. The Volcker Rule and Final Rules contain a number of exceptions. The Volcker Rule permits transactions in the securities of the U.S. government and its agencies, certain government-sponsored enterprises and states and their political subdivisions, as well as certain investments in small business investment companies. Transactions on behalf of customers and in connection with certain underwriting and market making activities, as well as risk-mitigating hedging activities and certain foreign banking activities are also permitted. The Final Rules exclude certain funds from the prohibition on fund ownership and sponsorship including wholly-owned subsidiaries, joint ventures, and acquisitions vehicles, as well as SEC registered investment companies.De minimis ownership of private equity or hedge funds is also permitted under the Final Rules. In addition to the general prohibition on sponsorship and investment, the Volcker rule contains additional requirements applicable to any private equity or hedge fund that is sponsored by the banking entity or for which it serves as investment manager or investment advisor. The Bancorp is required under the Final Rules to demonstrate that it has a Volcker Rule compliance program. Further, with respect to covered funds that are “illiquid funds”, the FRB has the authority to grant up to five more years for the Bancorp to conform to the final Volcker Rule with respect to such illiquid funds.

Derivatives

Title VII of the DFA includes measures to broaden the scope of derivative instruments subject to regulation by requiring clearing and exchange trading of certain derivatives, imposing new capital and margin requirements for certain market participants and imposing position limits on certainover-the-counter derivatives. Fifth Third Bank is provisionally registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a swap dealer. As with the Volcker Rule, the Bank is required to demonstrate that it has a satisfactory compliance program to monitor its activities under these regulations. Certain regulations implementing Title VII of the DFA have not been finalized. The ultimate impact of these regulations, and the time it will take to comply, continues to remain uncertain. The final regulations may impose additional operational and compliance costs on us and may require us to restructure certain businesses and negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.

Future Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives

Federal and state legislators as well as regulatory agencies may introduce or enact new laws and rules, or amend existing laws and rules, that may affect the regulation of financial institutions and their holding companies. The impact of any future legislative or regulatory changes cannot be predicted. However, such changes could affect Bancorp’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

190  Fifth Third Bancorp


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The risks listed below present risks that could have a material impact on the Bancorp’s financial condition, the results of its operations, or its business. Some of these risks are interrelated, and the occurrence of one or more of them may exacerbate the effect of others.

RISKS RELATING TO ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS

Weakness in the U.S. economy, including within Fifth Third’s geographic footprint, has adversely affected Fifth Third in the past and may adversely affect Fifth Third in the future.

If the strength of the U.S. economy in general or the strength of the local economies in which Fifth Third conducts operations declines, this could result in, among other things, a decreased demand for Fifth Third’s products and services, a deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit, including a resultant effect on Fifth Third’s loan portfolio and ALLL and in the receipt of lower proceeds from the sale of loans and foreclosed properties. These factors could result in higher delinquencies, greater charge-offs and increased losses in future periods, which could materially adversely affect Fifth Third’s financial condition and results of operations.

Global financial conditions could hamper economic recovery or contribute to recessionary economic conditions and severe stress in the financial markets, including in the United States. Should the U.S. economy be adversely impacted by these factors, the likelihood for loan and asset growth at U.S. financial institutions, like Fifth Third, may deteriorate.

The global financial markets continue to be strained as a result of economic slowdowns, geopolitical concerns and the related path of commodity prices and interest rates. Divergence in economic growth in the U.S. and international economies and the resulting differences in monetary policy are placing strains on financial markets and strengthening the U.S. dollar. The relative strength of the U.S. dollar may continue to negatively impact the U.S. manufacturing sector. These factors could negatively impact the U.S. economy and affect the stability of global financial markets.

Changes in interest rates could affect Fifth Third’s income and cash flows.

Fifth Third’s income and cash flows depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and investment securities, and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond Fifth Third’s control, including general economic conditions in the U.S. or abroad and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies (in particular, the FRB). Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence the origination of loans, the prepayment speed of loans, the purchase of investments, the generation of deposits and the rates received on loans and investment securities and paid on deposits or other sources of funding. The impact of these changes may be magnified if Fifth Third does not effectively manage the relative sensitivity of its assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. Fluctuations in these areas may adversely affect Fifth Third and its shareholders.

Changes and trends in the capital markets may affect Fifth Third’s income and cash flows.

Fifth Third enters into and maintains trading and investment positions in the capital markets on its own behalf and manages investment positions on behalf of its customers. These investment positions include derivative financial instruments. The revenues and profits Fifth Third derives from managing proprietary and customer trading and investment positions are dependent on market prices. Market changes and trends may result in a decline in wealth and asset management revenue or investment or trading losses that may impact Fifth Third. Losses on behalf of its customers could expose Fifth Third to litigation, credit risks or loss of revenue from those clients and customers. Additionally, losses in Fifth Third’s trading and investment positions could lead to a loss with respect to those investments and may adversely affect Fifth Third’s income, cash flows and funding costs.

Problems encountered by financial institutions larger than or similar to Fifth Third could adversely affect financial markets generally and have direct and indirect adverse effects on Fifth Third.

Fifth Third has exposure to counterparties in the financial services industry and other industries, and routinely executes transactions with such counterparties, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds, and other institutional clients. Many of Fifth Third’s transactions with other financial institutions expose Fifth Third to credit risk in the event of default of a counterparty or client. In addition, Fifth Third’s credit risk may be affected when the collateral it holds cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure. The commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely interrelated as a result of credit, trading, clearing or other relationships between the institutions. As a result, concerns about, or a default or threatened default by, one institution could lead to significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems, losses or defaults by other institutions. This is sometimes referred to as “systemic risk” and may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, clearing houses, banks, securities firms and exchanges, with which the Bancorp interacts on a daily basis, and therefore could adversely affect Fifth Third.

Fifth Third’s stock price is volatile.

Fifth Third’s stock price has been volatile in the past and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include, without limitation:

Actual or anticipated variations in earnings;

Changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections;

Fifth Third’s announcements of developments related to its businesses;

Operating and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers;

Actions by government regulators and changes in the regulatory regime;

New technology used or services offered by traditional andnon-traditional competitors;

News reports of trends, concerns and other issues related to the financial services industry;

U.S. and global economic conditions;

Natural disasters;

Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism, military conflicts and withdrawal from the EU by the U.K. or other EU members.

191  Fifth Third Bancorp


The price for shares of Fifth Third’s common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to Fifth Third’s performance. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price for shares of Fifth Third’s common stock, and the current market price of such shares may not be indicative of future market prices.

RISKS RELATING TO FIFTH THIRD’S GENERAL BUSINESS

Changes in retail distribution strategies and consumer behavior may adversely impact Fifth Third’s investments in its bank premises and equipment and other assets and may lead to increased expenditures to change its retail distribution channel.

Fifth Third has significant investments in bank premises and equipment for its branch network including its 1,191 full-service banking centers, 50 parcels of land held for the development of future banking centers and 10 properties that are developed or in the process of being developed as branches, as well as its retail work force and other branch banking assets. Advances in technology such ase-commerce, telephone, internet and mobile banking, andin-branch self-service technologies including automatic teller machines and other equipment, as well as changing customer preferences for these other methods of accessing Fifth Third’s products and services, could affect the value of Fifth Third’s branch network or other retail distribution assets and may cause it to change its retail distribution strategy, close and/or sell certain branches or parcels of land held for development and restructure or reduce its remaining branches and work force. Further advances in technology and/or changes in customer preferences could have additional changes in Fifth Third’s retail distribution strategy and/or branch network. These actions could lead to losses on these assets or could adversely impact the carrying value of other long-lived assets and may lead to increased expenditures to renovate and reconfigure remaining branches or to otherwise reform its retail distribution channel.

Deteriorating credit quality has adversely impacted Fifth Third in the past and may adversely impact Fifth Third in the future.

When Fifth Third lends money or commits to lend money the Bancorp incurs credit risk or the risk of loss if borrowers do not repay their loans. The credit performance of the loan portfolios significantly affects the Bancorp’s financial results and condition. If the current economic environment were to deteriorate, more customers may have difficulty in repaying their loans or other obligations which could result in a higher level of credit losses and reserves for credit losses. Fifth Third reserves for credit losses by establishing reserves through a charge to earnings. The amount of these reserves is based on Fifth Third’s assessment of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio including unfunded credit commitments. The process for determining the amount of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments is critical to Fifth Third’s financial results and condition. It requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments about the environment, including analysis of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of borrowers to repay their loans.

Fifth Third might underestimate the credit losses inherent in its loan portfolio and have credit losses in excess of the amount reserved. Fifth Third might increase the reserve because of

changing economic conditions, including falling home prices or higher unemployment, or other factors such as changes in borrower’s behavior. As an example, borrowers may “strategically default,” or discontinue making payments on their real estate-secured loans if the value of the real estate is less than what they owe, even if they are still financially able to make the payments.

Fifth Third believes that both the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments are adequate to cover inherent losses at December 31, 2016; however, there is no assurance that they will be sufficient to cover future credit losses, especially if housing and employment conditions decline. In the event of significant deterioration in economic conditions, Fifth Third may be required to increase reserves in future periods, which would reduce earnings.

For more information, refer to the Credit Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A and the Allowance for Loan and Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments subsections of the Critical Accounting Policies section of MD&A.

Fifth Third must maintain adequate sources of funding and liquidity.

Fifth Third must maintain adequate funding sources in the normal course of business to support its operations and fund outstanding liabilities, as well as meet regulatory expectations. Fifth Third primarily relies on bank deposits to be a low cost and stable source of funding for the loans Fifth Third makes and the operations of Fifth Third’s business. Core deposits, which include transaction deposits and other time deposits, have historically provided Fifth Third with a sizeable source of relatively stable andlow-cost funds (average core deposits funded 70% of average total assets at December 31, 2016). In addition to customer deposits, sources of liquidity include investments in the securities portfolio, Fifth Third’s sale or securitization of loans in secondary markets and the pledging of loans and investment securities to access secured borrowing facilities through the FHLB and the FRB, and Fifth Third’s ability to raise funds in domestic and international money and capital markets.

Fifth Third’s liquidity and ability to fund and run the business could be materially adversely affected by a variety of conditions and factors, including financial and credit market disruptions and volatility or a lack of market or customer confidence in financial markets in general similar to what occurred during the financial crisis in 2008 and early 2009, which may result in a loss of customer deposits or outflows of cash or collateral and/or ability to access capital markets on favorable terms.

Other conditions and factors that could materially adversely affect Fifth Third’s liquidity and funding include:

a lack of market or customer confidence in Fifth Third or negative news about Fifth Third or the financial services industry generally, which also may result in a loss of deposits and/or negatively affect the ability to access the capital markets;

the loss of customer deposits to alternative investments;

inability to sell or securitize loans or other assets,

increased regulatory requirements,

and reductions in one or more of Fifth Third’s credit ratings.

192  Fifth Third Bancorp


A reduced credit rating could adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to borrow funds and raise the cost of borrowings substantially and could cause creditors and business counterparties to raise collateral requirements or take other actions that could adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to raise capital. Many of the above conditions and factors may be caused by events over which Fifth Third has little or no control such as what occurred during the financial crisis. While market conditions have stabilized and, in many cases, improved, there can be no assurance that significant disruption and volatility in the financial markets will not occur in the future.

Recent regulatory changes relating to liquidity and risk management may also negatively impact Fifth Third’s results of operations and competitive position. Various regulations recently adopted or proposed, and additional regulations under consideration, impose or could impose more stringent liquidity requirements for large financial institutions, including Fifth Third. These regulations address, among other matters, liquidity stress testing, minimum liquidity requirements and restrictions on short-term debt issued bytop-tier holding companies. Given the overlap and complex interactions of these regulations with other regulatory changes, including the resolution and recovery framework applicable to Fifth Third, the full impact of the adopted and proposed regulations will remain uncertain until their full implementation. It is also uncertain whether adopted and proposed regulations will ultimately be rolled back or modified as a result of the change in administration in the U.S. Uncertainty about the timing and scope of any such changes as well as the cost of complying with a new regulatory regime may negatively impact Fifth Third’s business.

If Fifth Third is unable to continue to fund assets through customer bank deposits or access capital markets on favorable terms or if Fifth Third suffers an increase in borrowing costs or otherwise fails to manage liquidity effectively, then Fifth Third’s liquidity, operating margins, and financial results and condition may be materially adversely affected. As Fifth Third did during the financial crisis, it may also need to raise additional capital through the issuance of stock, which could dilute the ownership of existing stockholders, or reduce or even eliminate common stock dividends to preserve capital.

Fifth Third may have more credit risk and higher credit losses to the extent loans are concentrated by location or industry of the borrowers or collateral.

Fifth Third’s credit risk and credit losses can increase if its loans are concentrated to borrowers engaged in the same or similar activities or to borrowers who as a group may be uniquely or disproportionately affected by economic or market conditions. Deterioration in economic conditions, housing conditions and commodity and real estate values in certain states or locations could result in materially higher credit losses if loans are concentrated in those locations. Fifth Third has significant exposures to businesses in certain economic sectors such as manufacturing, real estate, financial services and insurance and weaknesses in those businesses may adversely impact Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally Fifth Third has a substantial portfolio of commercial and residential real estate loans and weaknesses in residential or commercial real estate markets may adversely impact Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or financial condition.

Fifth Third may be required to repurchase residential mortgage loans or reimburse investors and others as a result of breaches in contractual representations and warranties.

Fifth Third sells residential mortgage loans to various parties, including GSEs and other financial institutions that purchase residential mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. Fifth Third may be required to repurchase residential mortgage loans, indemnify the securitization trust, investor or insurer, or reimburse the securitization trust, investor or insurer for credit losses incurred on loans in the event of a breach of contractual representations or warranties that is not remedied within a specified period (usually 60 days or less) after Fifth Third receives notice of the breach. Contracts for residential mortgage loan sales to the GSEs include various types of specific remedies and penalties that could be applied to inadequate responses to repurchase requests. If economic conditions and the housing market deteriorate or future investor repurchase demand and Fifth Third’s success at appealing repurchase requests differ from past experience, Fifth Third could have increased repurchase obligations and increased loss severity on repurchases, requiring material additions to the repurchase reserve.

If Fifth Third does not respond to rapid changes in the financial services industry or otherwise adapt to changing customer preferences, its financial performance may suffer.

Fifth Third’s ability to deliver strong financial performance and returns on investment to shareholders will depend in part on its ability to expand the scope of available financial services to meet the needs and demands of its customers. In addition to the challenge of competing against other banks in attracting and retaining customers for traditional banking services, Fifth Third’s competitors also include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, and specialty finance, telecommunications, technology and insurance companies who seek to offerone-stop financial services that may include services that banks have not been able or allowed to offer to their customers in the past or may not be currently able or allowed to offer.

This increasingly competitive environment is primarily a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems, as well as the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. Rapidly changing technology and consumer preferences may require Fifth Third to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services in order to compete and meet customer demands. Fifth Third may not be able to do so or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. As a result, Fifth Third’s ability to effectively compete to retain or acquire new business may be impaired, and its business, financial condition or results of operations, may be adversely affected.

Fifth Third may make strategic investments and may expand an existing line of business or enter into new lines of business to remain competitive. If Fifth Third’s chosen strategies, for example, the NorthStar Strategy initiatives, are not appropriate to effectively compete or Fifth Third does not execute them in an appropriate or timely manner, Fifth Third’s business and results may suffer. Additionally, these strategies, products and lines of business may bring with them unforeseeable or unforeseen risks and may not generate the expected results or returns, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s results of operations or future growth prospects and cause Fifth Third to fail to meet its stated goals and expectations.

193  Fifth Third Bancorp


Fifth Third may not be able to successfully implement future information technology system enhancements, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s business operations and profitability.

Fifth Third invests significant resources in information technology system enhancements in order to provide functionality and security at an appropriate level. Fifth Third may not be able to successfully implement and integrate future system enhancements, which could adversely impact the ability to provide timely and accurate financial information in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which could result in sanctions from regulatory authorities. Such sanctions could include fines and result in reputational harm and have other negative effects. In addition, future system enhancements could have higher than expected costs and/or result in operating inefficiencies, which could increase the costs associated with the implementation as well as ongoing operations. Failure to properly utilize system enhancements that are implemented in the future could result in impairment charges that adversely impact Fifth Third’s financial condition and results of operations and could result in significant costs to remediate or replace the defective components. In addition, Fifth Third may incur significant training, licensing, maintenance, consulting and amortization expenses during and after systems implementations, and any such costs may continue for an extended period of time.

If Fifth Third is unable to grow its deposits, it may be subject to paying higher funding costs.

The total amount that Fifth Third pays for funding costs is dependent, in part, on Fifth Third’s ability to grow its deposits. If Fifth Third is unable to sufficiently grow its deposits to meet liquidity objectives, it may be subject to paying higher funding costs. Fifth Third competes with banks and other financial services companies for deposits. If competitors raise the rates they pay on deposits, Fifth Third’s funding costs may increase, either because Fifth Third raises rates to avoid losing deposits or because Fifth Third loses deposits and must rely on more expensive sources of funding. Higher funding costs reduce Fifth Third’s net interest margin and net interest income. Fifth Third’s bank customers could take their money out of the Bank and put it in alternative investments, causing Fifth Third to lose a lower cost source of funding. Checking and savings account balances and other forms of customer deposits may decrease when customers perceive alternative investments, such as the stock market, as providing a better risk/return tradeoff.

The Bancorp’s ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries accounts for most of its revenue and could affect its liquidity and ability to pay dividends.

Fifth Third Bancorp is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. Fifth Third Bancorp typically receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on Fifth Third Bancorp’s stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations, as well as regulatory expectations, limit the amount of dividends that the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary and certain nonbank subsidiaries may pay. Regulatory scrutiny of capital levels at bank holding companies and insured depository institution subsidiaries has increased since the financial crisis and has resulted in increased regulatory focus on all aspects of capital planning, including dividends and other distributions to shareholders of banks such as the parent bank

holding companies. Also, Fifth Third Bancorp’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of that subsidiary’s creditors. Limitations on the Bancorp’s ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity and ability to pay dividends on stock or interest and principal on its debt. For further information refer to Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The financial services industry is highly competitive and creates competitive pressures that could adversely affect Fifth Third’s revenue and profitability.

The financial services industry in which Fifth Third operates is highly competitive. Fifth Third competes not only with commercial banks, but also with insurance companies, mutual funds, hedge funds, telecommunications and technology and other companies offering financial services in the U.S., globally and over the internet. Fifth Third competes on the basis of several factors, including capital, access to capital, revenue generation, products, services, transaction execution, innovation, reputation and price. Over time, certain sectors of the financial services industry have become more concentrated, as institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms. These developments could result in Fifth Third’s competitors gaining greater capital and other resources, such as a broader range of products and services and geographic diversity. Fifth Third may experience pricing pressures as a result of these factors and as some of its competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.

Fifth Third and/or the holders of its securities could be adversely affected by unfavorable ratings from rating agencies.

Fifth Third’s ability to access the capital markets is important to its overall funding profile. This access is affected by the ratings assigned by rating agencies to Fifth Third, certain of its subsidiaries and particular classes of securities they issue. The interest rates that Fifth Third pays on its securities are also influenced by, among other things, the credit ratings that it, its subsidiaries and/or its securities receive from recognized rating agencies. A downgrade to Fifth Third or its subsidiaries’ credit rating could affect its ability to access the capital markets, increase its borrowing costs and negatively impact its profitability. A ratings downgrade to Fifth Third, its subsidiaries or their securities could also create obligations or liabilities of Fifth Third under the terms of its outstanding securities that could increase Fifth Third’s costs or otherwise have a negative effect on its results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, a downgrade of the credit rating of any particular security issued by Fifth Third or its subsidiaries could negatively affect the ability of the holders of that security to sell the securities and the prices at which any such securities may be sold.

Fifth Third could suffer if it fails to attract and retain skilled personnel.

Fifth Third’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key individuals. Competition for qualified candidates in the activities and markets that Fifth Third serves is intense, which may increase Fifth Third’s expenses and may result in Fifth Third not being able to hire candidates or retain them. If Fifth Third is not able to hire qualified candidates or retain its key personnel, Fifth Third may be unable to execute its business strategies and may suffer adverse consequences to its business, operations and financial condition.

194  Fifth Third Bancorp


Compensation paid by financial institutions such as Fifth Third has become increasingly regulated, particularly under the DFA, which regulation affects the amount and form of compensation Fifth Third pays to hire and retain talented employees. If Fifth Third is unable to attract and retain qualified employees, or do so at rates necessary to maintain its competitive position, or if compensation costs required to attract and retain employees become more expensive, Fifth Third’s performance, including its competitive position, could be materially adversely affected.

Fifth Third’s mortgage banking revenue can be volatile from quarter to quarter.

Fifth Third earns revenue from the fees it receives for originating mortgage loans and for servicing mortgage loans. When rates rise, the demand for mortgage loans tends to fall, reducing the revenue Fifth Third receives from loan originations. At the same time, revenue from MSRs can increase through increases in fair value. When rates fall, mortgage originations tend to increase and the value of MSRs tends to decline, also with some offsetting revenue effect. Even though the origination of mortgage loans can act as a “natural hedge,” the hedge is not perfect, either in amount or timing. For example, the negative effect on revenue from a decrease in the fair value of residential MSRs is immediate, but any offsetting revenue benefit from more originations and the MSRs relating to the new loans would accrue over time. It is also possible that even if interest rates were to fall, mortgage originations may also fall or any increase in mortgage originations may not be enough to offset the decrease in the MSRs value caused by the lower rates.

Fifth Third typically uses derivatives and other instruments to hedge its mortgage banking interest rate risk. Fifth Third generally does not hedge all of its risks, and the fact that Fifth Third attempts to hedge any of the risks does not mean Fifth Third will be successful. Hedging is a complex process, requiring sophisticated models and constant monitoring. Fifth Third may use hedging instruments tied to U.S. Treasury rates, LIBOR or Eurodollars that may not perfectly correlate with the value or income being hedged. Fifth Third could incur significant losses from its hedging activities. There may be periods where Fifth Third elects not to use derivatives and other instruments to hedge mortgage banking interest rate risk.

Fifth Third uses models for business planning purposes that may not adequately predict future results.

Fifth Third uses financial models to aid in its planning for various purposes including its capital and liquidity needs and other purposes. The models used may not accurately account for all variables and may fail to predict outcomes accurately and/or may overstate or understate certain effects. As a result of these potential failures, Fifth Third may not adequately prepare for future events and may suffer losses or other setbacks due to these failures.

Also, information Fifth Third provides to the public or to its regulators based on models could be inaccurate or misleading due to inadequate design or implementation, for example. Decisions that its regulators make, including those related to capital distributions to its shareholders, could be affected adversely due to the perception that the models used to generate the relevant information are unreliable or inadequate.

Changes in interest rates could also reduce the value of MSRs.

Fifth Third acquires MSRs when it keeps the servicing rights after the sale or securitization of the loans that have been originated or when it purchases the servicing rights to mortgage loans originated by other lenders. Fifth Third initially measures all residential MSRs at fair value and subsequently amortizes the MSRs in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. Fair value is the present value of estimated future net servicing income, calculated based on a number of variables, including assumptions about the likelihood of prepayment by borrowers. Servicing rights are assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance and other-than-temporary impairment recognized through awrite-off of the servicing asset and related valuation allowance.

Changes in interest rates can affect prepayment assumptions and thus fair value. When interest rates fall, borrowers are usually more likely to prepay their mortgage loans by refinancing them at a lower rate. As the likelihood of prepayment increases, the fair value of MSRs can decrease. Each quarter Fifth Third evaluates the fair value of MSRs, and decreases in fair value of MSRs below amortized cost reduce earnings in the period in which the decrease occurs.

The preparation of financial statements requires Fifth Third to make subjective determinations and use estimates that may vary from actual results and materially impact its results of operations or financial position.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. If new information arises that results in a material change to a reserve amount, such a change could result in a change to previously announced financial results. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies section of MD&A for more information regarding management’s significant estimates.

Changes in accounting standards or interpretations could impact Fifth Third’s reported earnings and financial condition.

The accounting standard setters, including the FASB, the SEC and other regulatory agencies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of Fifth Third’s consolidated financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how Fifth Third records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, Fifth Third could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, which would result in the recasting of Fifth Third’s prior period financial statements.

Future acquisitions may dilute current shareholders’ ownership of Fifth Third and may cause Fifth Third to become more susceptible to adverse economic events.

Future business acquisitions could be material to Fifth Third and it may issue additional shares of stock to pay for those acquisitions, which would dilute current shareholders’ ownership interests. Acquisitions also could require Fifth Third to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur debt. In those events, Fifth Third could become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.

195  Fifth Third Bancorp


Difficulties in identifying suitable opportunities or combining the operations of acquired entities or assets with Fifth Third’s own operations or assessing the effectiveness of businesses in which we make strategic investments or with which we enter into strategic contractual relationships may prevent Fifth Third from achieving the expected benefits from these acquisitions, investments or relationships.

Inherent uncertainties exist when assessing or integrating the operations of an acquired business or investment or relationship opportunity. Fifth Third may not be able to fully achieve its strategic objectives and planned operating efficiencies in an acquisition or strategic relationship. In addition, the markets and industries in which Fifth Third and its potential acquisition and investment targets operate are highly competitive. Acquisition or investment targets may lose customers or otherwise perform poorly or unprofitably, in the case of an acquired business or strategic relationship, cause Fifth Third to lose customers or perform poorly or unprofitably. Future acquisition and integration activities and efforts to monitor new investments or reap the benefits of a new strategic relationship may require Fifth Third to devote substantial time and resources and may cause these acquisitions, investments and relationships to be unprofitable or cause Fifth Third to be unable to pursue other business opportunities.

After completing an acquisition, Fifth Third may find certain items were not accounted for properly in accordance with financial accounting and reporting standards. Fifth Third may also not realize the expected benefits of the acquisition due to lower financial results pertaining to the acquired entity or assets. For example, Fifth Third could experience higher charge-offs than originally anticipated related to the acquired loan portfolio. Additionally, acquired companies or businesses may increase Fifth Third’s risk of regulatory action or restrictions related to the operations of the acquired business.

Fifth Third may sell or consider selling one or more of its businesses. Should it determine to sell such a business, it may not be able to generate gains on sale or related increase in shareholders’ equity commensurate with desirable levels. Moreover, if Fifth Third sold such businesses, the loss of income could have an adverse effect on its earnings and future growth.

Fifth Third owns, or owns a minority stake in, as applicable, severalnon-strategic businesses and other assets that are not significantly synergistic with its core financial services businesses or may no longer be aligned with Fifth Third’s strategic plans. Fifth Third has, from time to time, considered and undertaken (and, in the case of Vantiv, has announced its intention to continue) the sale of such businesses and/or interests, including, for example, portions of Fifth Third’s stake in Vantiv Holding, LLC. If it were to determine to sell such businesses and/or interests, Fifth Third would be subject to market forces that may make completion of a sale unsuccessful or may not be able to do so within a desirable time frame. If Fifth Third were to complete the sale of any of its businesses and/or interests in third parties, it would lose the income from the sold businesses and/or interests, including those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and such loss of income could have an adverse effect on its future earnings and growth. Additionally, Fifth Third may encounter difficulties in separating the operations of any businesses it sells, which may affect its business or results of operations.

Fifth Third relies on its systems and certain third party service providers, and certain failures could materially adversely affect operations.

Fifth Third collects, processes and stores sensitive consumer data by utilizing computer systems and telecommunications networks operated by both Fifth Third and third party service providers. Fifth Third has security, backup and recovery systems in place, as well as a business continuity plan to ensure the systems will not be inoperable. Fifth Third also has security to prevent unauthorized access to the systems. In addition, Fifth Third requires its third party service providers to maintain similar controls. However, Fifth Third cannot be certain that the measures will be successful. A security breach in the systems and loss of confidential information such as credit card numbers and related information could result in significant reputational harm and the loss of customers’ confidence in Fifth Third. As a result, we may lose existing and new customers and incur significant costs, including privacy monitoring activities.

Fifth Third’s necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transaction volume poses the risk that technical system flaws or employee errors, tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses and may be difficult to detect. Fifth Third may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages).

Third parties with which the Bancorp does business, as well as retailers and other third parties with which the Bancorp’s customers do business, can also be sources of operational risk to the Bancorp, particularly where activities of customers are beyond the Bancorp’s security and control systems, such as through the use of the internet, personal computers, tablets, smart phones and other mobile services. Security breaches affecting the Bancorp’s customers, or systems breakdowns or failures, security breaches or employee misconduct affecting such other third parties, may require the Bancorp to take steps to protect the integrity of its own operational systems or to safeguard confidential information of the Bancorp or its customers, thereby increasing the Bancorp’s operational costs and potentially diminishing customer satisfaction. If personal, confidential or proprietary information of customers or clients in the Bancorp’s possession were to be mishandled or misused, the Bancorp could suffer significant regulatory consequences, reputational damage and financial loss. Such mishandling or misuse could include circumstances where, for example, such information was erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, either through the fault of the Bancorp’s systems, employees or counterparties, or where such information was intercepted or otherwise compromised by third parties. The Bancorp may be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond the Bancorp’s control, which may include, for example, security breaches; electrical or telecommunications outages; failures of computer servers or other damage to the Bancorp’s property or assets; natural disasters or severe weather conditions; health emergencies; or events arising from local or larger-scale political events, including outbreaks of hostilities or terrorist acts. While the Bancorp believes that its current resiliency plans are both sufficient and adequate, there can be no assurance that such plans will fully mitigate all potential business continuity risks to the Bancorp or its customers and clients.

196  Fifth Third Bancorp


Any failures or disruptions of the Bancorp’s systems or operations could give rise to losses in service to customers and clients, adversely affect the Bancorp’s business and results of operations by subjecting the Bancorp to losses or liability, or require the Bancorp to expend significant resources to correct the failure or disruption, as well as by exposing the Bancorp to reputational harm, litigation, regulatory fines or penalties or losses not covered by insurance.

Fifth Third is exposed to cyber-security risks, including denial of service, hacking, and identity theft, which could result in the disclosure, theft or destruction of confidential information.

Fifth Third relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in disruptions to its accounting, deposit, loan and other systems, and adversely affect its customer relationships. While Fifth Third has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of these possible events, there can be no assurance that any such failure, interruption or security breach will not occur or, if any does occur, that it can be sufficiently remediated. There have been increasing efforts on the part of third parties, including through cyber-attacks, to breach data security at financial institutions or with respect to financial transactions. There have been several recent instances involving financial services and consumer-based companies reporting the unauthorized disclosure of client or customer information or the destruction or theft of corporate data, by both private individuals and foreign governments. In addition, because the techniques used to cause such security breaches change frequently, often are not recognized until launched against a target and may originate from less regulated and remote areas around the world, Fifth Third may be unable to proactively address these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Furthermore, there has been a well-publicized series of apparently related distributed denial of service attacks on large financial services companies, including Fifth Third Bank, and “ransom” attacks where hackers have requested payments in exchange for not disclosing customer information. Distributed denial of service attacks are designed to saturate the targeted online network with excessive amounts of network traffic, resulting in slow response times, or in some cases, causing the site to be temporarily unavailable. These events adversely affected the performance of Fifth Third’s website and in some instances prevented customers from accessing Fifth Third’s website. Future cyber-attacks could be more disruptive and damaging. Cyber threats are rapidly evolving and Fifth Third may not be able to anticipate or prevent all such attacks. Fifth Third may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize these risks or in the investigation of such cyber-attacks or related to the protection of the Bancorp’s customers from identity theft as a result of such attacks. Despite this effort, the occurrence of any failure, interruption or security breach of Fifth Third’s systems or third-party service providers, particularly if widespread or resulting in financial losses to customers, could also seriously damage Fifth Third’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject it to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose it to civil litigation and financial liability.

Fifth Third is exposed to operational and reputational risk.

Fifth Third is exposed to many types of operational risk, including but not limited to, business continuity risk, information management risk, fraud risk, model risk, third party service provider risk, human resources risk, and process risk.

Fifth Third’s actual or alleged conduct in activities, such as lending practices, data security, corporate governance and acquisitions, may result in negative public opinion and may damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Actions taken by government regulators and community

organizations may also damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Additionally, whereas negative public opinion once was primarily driven by adverse news coverage in traditional media, the advent and expansion of social media facilitates the rapid dissemination of information. Though Fifth Third monitors social media channels, the potential remains for rapid and widespread dissemination of inaccurate, misleading or false information that could damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Negative public opinion can adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to attract and keep customers and can increase the risk that it will be a target of litigation and regulatory action.

Fifth Third’s framework for managing risks may not be effective in mitigating its risk and loss.

Fifth Third’s risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and loss. Fifth Third has established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, and analyze the types of risk to which it is subject, including liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, compliance risk, strategic risk, reputational risk, and operational risk related to its employees, systems and vendors, among others. Any system of control and any system to reduce risk exposure, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. A failure in Fifth Third’s internal controls could have a significant negative impact not only on its earnings, but also on the perception that customers, regulators and investors may have of Fifth Third. Fifth Third continues to devote a significant amount of effort, time and resources to improving its controls and ensuring compliance with complex regulations.

Additionally, instruments, systems and strategies used to hedge or otherwise manage exposure to various types of market compliance, credit, liquidity, operational and business risks and enterprise-wide risk could be less effective than anticipated. As a result, Fifth Third may not be able to effectively mitigate its risk exposures in particular market environments or against particular types of risk. If Fifth Third’s risk management framework proves ineffective, Fifth Third could incur litigation, negative regulatory consequences, reputational damages among other adverse consequences and Fifth Third could suffer unexpected losses that may affect its financial condition or results of operations.

The results of Vantiv Holding, LLC could have a negative impact on Fifth Third’s operating results and financial condition.

In 2009, Fifth Third sold an approximate 51% interest in its processing business, Vantiv Holding, LLC (formerly Fifth Third Processing Solutions). As a result of additional share sales completed by Fifth Third in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the Bancorp ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC as of December 31, 2016, is approximately 18%. The Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC is currently accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is not consolidated based on Fifth Third’s remaining ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC. Vantiv Holding, LLC’s operating results could be poor and could negatively affect the operating results of Fifth Third. In addition, Fifth Third participates in a multi-lender credit facility to Vantiv Holding, LLC and repayment of these loans is contingent on the future cash flows of Vantiv Holding, LLC, which are subject to their own risks and uncertainties.

197  Fifth Third Bancorp


Changes in Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv Holding, LLC could have an impact on Fifth Third’s stock price, operating results, financial condition, and future outlook.

Fifth Third expects that it will reduce its equity investments in Vantiv Holding, LLC and its publicly traded parent, Vantiv, Inc., in whole or in part, but there can be no assurance that such sales will occur or as to when they will occur or the value that might be received by Fifth Third. A reduction in Fifth Third’s Vantiv ownership interest may result from a series of sale transactions similar to transactions in Vantiv securities engaged in by Fifth Third to date, or could occur as a result of one or more larger transactions, depending on strategic considerations, market conditions, or other factors deemed important by Fifth Third. Additionally, Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv could be affected by transactions that Vantiv may undertake. The nature, terms, and timing of transactions engaged in by Vantiv may not be entirely within Fifth Third’s control, if at all. If and when Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv is reduced, such changes in ownership could have a material impact, positive or negative, on Fifth Third’s stock price, operating results, financial condition and future outlook.

Weather related events or other natural disasters may have an effect on the performance of Fifth Third’s loan portfolios, especially in its coastal markets, thereby adversely impacting its results of operations.

Fifth Third’s footprint stretches from the upper Midwestern to lower Southeastern regions of the United States. These regions have experienced weather events including hurricanes and other natural disasters. The nature and level of these events and the impact of global climate change upon their frequency and severity cannot be predicted. If large scale events occur, they may significantly impact its loan portfolios by damaging properties pledged as collateral as well as impairing its borrowers’ ability to repay their loans.

RISKS RELATED TO THE LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

As a regulated entity, the Bancorp is subject to certain capital requirements that may limit its operations and potential growth.

The Bancorp is a bank holding company and a financial holding company. As such, it is subject to the comprehensive, consolidated supervision and regulation of the FRB, including risk-based and leverage capital requirements, investment practices, dividend policy and growth. The Bancorp must maintain certain risk-based and leverage capital ratios as required by the FRB which can change depending upon general economic conditions and the Bancorp’s particular condition, risk profile and growth plans. Compliance with the capital requirements, including leverage ratios, may limit operations that require the intensive use of capital and could adversely affect the Bancorp’s ability to expand or maintain present business levels.

U.S. federal banking agencies’ capital rules implementing Basel III became effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject tophase-in periods for certain components and other provisions. The need to maintain more and higher quality capital as well as greater liquidity could limit Fifth Third’s business activities, including lending, and the ability to expand, either organically or through acquisitions. Moreover, although the capital requirements are being phased in over time, U.S. federal banking agencies take into account expectations regarding the ability of banks to meet the capital requirements, including under stressed conditions, in approving actions that represent uses of capital, such as dividend increases and share repurchases.

Failure by the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary to meet applicable capital requirements could subject the Bank to a variety of enforcement remedies available to the federal regulatory authorities. These include limitations on the ability to pay dividends, the issuance by the regulatory authority of a capital directive to increase capital, and the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC.

Fifth Third’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by new or changed regulations and by the manner in which such regulations are applied by regulatory authorities.

Previous economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial services industry. The U.S. government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by introducing various actions and passing legislation such as the DFA. Such programs and legislation subject Fifth Third and other financial institutions to restrictions, oversight and/or costs that may have an impact on Fifth Third’s business, financial condition, results of operations or the price of its common stock.

Although there is uncertainty regarding whether the programs implemented and the legislation passed following the financial crisis will remain in place or be modified or repealed under the new administration in the U.S., any new proposals for legislation and regulations introduced could further substantially increase compliance costs in the financial services industry. In addition, changes to laws and regulations could have a negatively impact in the short term even if the longer-term impact of those changes may be expected to be positive for Fifth Third. Fifth Third cannot predict whether any pending or future legislation will be adopted or the substance and impact of any such new legislation on Fifth Third. Changes in regulation could affect Fifth Third in a substantial way and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fifth Third is subject to various regulatory requirements that may limit its operations and potential growth.

Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions and their holding companies, the FRB, the FDIC, the CFPB and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions have the authority to compel or restrict certain actions by Fifth Third and its banking subsidiary, Fifth Third Bank. Fifth Third and its banking subsidiary are subject to such supervisory authority and, more generally, must, in certain instances, obtain prior regulatory approval before engaging in certain activities or corporate decisions. There can be no assurance that such approvals, if required, would be forthcoming or that such approvals would be granted in a timely manner. Failure to receive any such approval, if required, could limit or impair Fifth Third’s operations, restrict its growth and/or affect its dividend policy. Such actions and activities subject to prior approval include, but are not limited to, increasing dividends paid by Fifth Third or its banking subsidiary, entering into a merger or acquisition transaction, acquiring or establishing new branches, and entering into certain new businesses.

198  Fifth Third Bancorp


The Bancorp is a bank holding company and a financial holding company. Failure by the Bancorp or Fifth Third Bank to meet the applicable eligibility requirements for financial holding company status (including capital and management requirements and that Fifth Third Bank maintain at least a “Satisfactory” CRA rating) may result in restrictions on certain activities of the Bancorp, including the commencement of new activities and mergers with or acquisitions of other financial institutions, and could ultimately result in the loss of financial holding company status.

In the wake of the most recent global financial crisis, Fifth Third and other financial institutions more generally have been subjected to increased scrutiny from government authorities, including bank regulatory authorities, stemming from broader systemic regulatory concerns, including with respect to stress testing, capital levels, asset quality, provisioning, AML/BSA, consumer compliance and other prudential matters and efforts to ensure that financial institutions take steps to improve their risk management and prevent future crises.

In this regard, government authorities, including the bank regulatory agencies, are also pursuing aggressive enforcement actions with respect to compliance and other legal matters involving financial activities, which heightens the risks associated with actual and perceived compliance failures and may also adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to enter into certain transactions or engage in certain activities, or obtain necessary regulatory approvals in connection therewith.

In some cases, regulatory agencies may take supervisory actions that may not be publicly disclosed, which restrict or limit a financial institution. Finally, as part of Fifth Third’s regular examination process, Fifth Third’s and its banking subsidiary’s respective regulators may advise it and its banking subsidiary to operate under various restrictions as a prudential matter. Such supervisory actions or restrictions, if and in whatever manner imposed, could negatively affect Fifth Third’s ability to engage in new activities and certain transactions, as well as have a material adverse effect on Fifth Third’s business and results of operations and may not be publicly disclosed.

In July 2016, the FRB announced that Fifth Third Bank received a rating of “Needs to Improve” on its CRA examination for the period covering 2011-2013 following its periodic examination to determine Fifth Third Bank’s compliance with the CRA from 2011 through 2013. While Fifth Third Bank’s CRA rating is “Needs to Improve” the Bancorp and Fifth Third Bank face limitations and conditions on certain activities (including the commencement of new activities and merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions) and the potential loss of financial holding company status. As a result of these limitations and conditions, Fifth Third may be unable or may fail to pursue, evaluate or complete transactions that might have been strategically or competitively significant. The Bank’s next CRA examination commenced during the fourth quarter of 2016.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, investigations and proceedings by various governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, as well as self-regulatory agencies which may lead to adverse consequences.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, as well as self-regulatory agencies, regarding their respective customers and businesses. In addition, the complexity of the federal and state

regulatory and enforcement regimes in the U.S. means that a single event or topic may give rise to numerous and overlapping investigations and regulatory proceedings. Such matters may result in material adverse consequences, including without limitation, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other actions, amendments and/or restatements of Fifth Third’s SEC filings and/or financial statements, as applicable, and/or determinations of material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures.

There has been a trend of large settlements with governmental agencies that may adversely affect the outcomes for other financial institutions, to the extent they are used as a template for other settlements in the future. The uncertain regulatory enforcement environment makes it difficult to estimate probable losses, which can lead to substantial disparities between legal reserves and actual settlements or penalties.

Deposit insurance premiums levied against Fifth Third Bank may increase if the number of bank failures increase or the cost of resolving failed banks increases.

The FDIC maintains a DIF to protect insured depositors in the event of bank failures. The DIF is funded by fees assessed on insured depository institutions including Fifth Third Bank. Future deposit premiums paid by Fifth Third Bank depend on FDIC rules, which are subject to change, the level of the DIF and the magnitude and cost of future bank failures. Fifth Third Bank may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums if market developments change such that the DIF balance is reduced or the FDIC changes its rules to require higher premiums.

Fifth Third is subject to extensive governmental regulation which could adversely impact Fifth Third or the businesses in which Fifth Third is engaged.

Fifth Third is subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost all aspects of its operations and limit the businesses in which Fifth Third may engage. These laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers and depositors and are not designed to protect security-holders. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact Fifth Third or its ability to increase the value of its business. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against Fifth Third could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defending itself and may lead to penalties that materially affect Fifth Third and its shareholders. Future changes in the laws, including tax laws, or regulations or their interpretations or enforcement may also be materially adverse to Fifth Third and its shareholders or may require Fifth Third to expend significant time and resources to comply with such requirements.

The DFA, enacted in 2010, is complex and broad in scope and several of its provisions are still being implemented. The DFA established the CFPB which has authority to regulate consumer financial products and services sold by banks andnon-bank companies and to supervise banks with assets of more than $10 billion and their affiliates for compliance with Federal consumer protection laws. Since its formation, the CFPB has finalized a number of significant rules that could have a significant impact on Fifth Third’s business and the financial services industry more generally including integrated mortgage disclosures under the Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

199  Fifth Third Bancorp


Compliance with the rules and policies adopted by the CFPB may limit the products Fifth Third may permissibly offer to customers, or limit the terms on which those products may be issued, or may adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to conduct its business as previously conducted. Fifth Third may also be required to add additional compliance personnel or incur other significant compliance-related expenses. Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or competitive position may be adversely affected as a result.

The reforms, both under the DFA and otherwise, are having a significant effect on the entire financial industry. Fifth Third believes compliance with the DFA and implementing its regulations and other initiatives will likely continue to negatively impact revenue and increase the cost of doing business, both in terms of transition expenses and on an ongoing basis, and may also limit Fifth Third’s ability to pursue certain desirable business opportunities. Any new regulatory requirements or changes to existing requirements could require changes to Fifth Third’s businesses, result in increased compliance costs and affect the profitability of such businesses. Additionally, reform could affect the behaviors of third parties that Fifth Third deals with in the course of business, such as rating agencies, insurance companies and investors. The extent to which Fifth Third can adjust its strategies to offset such adverse impacts also is not known at this time.

We may become subject to more stringent regulatory requirements and activity restrictions if the FRB and FDIC determine that Fifth Third’s resolution plan is not credible.

The DFA and implementing regulations jointly issued by the FRB and FDIC require bank holding companies with more than $50 billion in assets to annually submit a resolution plan to the FRB and the FDIC that, in the event of material financial distress or failure, establish the rapid, orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. If the FRB and the FDIC jointly determine that Fifth Third’s resolution plan is not “credible,” Fifth Third could become subjected to more stringent capital, leverage or liquidity requirements or restrictions, or restrictions on Fifth Third’s growth, activities or operations, and could eventually be required to divest certain assets or operations in ways that could negatively impact its operations and strategy.

Conforming Covered Activities to the Volcker Rule may require the expenditure of resources and management attention and result in forced sales of assets.

Among other restricted activities, the DFA “Volcker Rule” generally restricts banks and their affiliates from sponsoring or retaining an interest in certain private equity and hedge funds. A forced sale of some or all (“Legacy Covered Funds”) could result in Fifth Third receiving less value than it would otherwise have received.

If an orderly liquidation of a systemically important bank holding company ornon-bank financial company were triggered, Fifth Third could face assessments for the Orderly Liquidation Fund.

The DFA created authority for the orderly liquidation of systemically important bank holding companies andnon-bank financial companies and is based on the FDIC’s bank resolution model. The Secretary of the U.S. Treasury may trigger liquidation under this authority only after consultation with the President of the United States and after receiving a recommendation from the

boards of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve upon atwo-thirds vote. Liquidation proceedings will be funded by the Orderly Liquidation Fund established under the DFA, which will borrow from the U.S. Treasury and impose risk-based assessments on covered financial companies. Risk-based assessments would be made, first, on entities that received more in the resolution than they would have received in the liquidation to the extent of such excess, and second, if necessary, on, among others, bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, such as Fifth Third. Any such assessments may adversely affect Fifth Third’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Regulation of Fifth Third by the CFTC imposes additional operational and compliance costs.

Title VII of DFA imposes a new regulatory regime on the U.S. derivatives markets. While most of the provisions related to derivatives markets are now in effect, several additional requirements await final regulations from the relevant regulatory agencies for derivatives, the CFTC and the SEC. One aspect of this new regulatory regime for derivatives is that substantial oversight responsibility has been provided to the CFTC, which, as a result, now has a meaningful supervisory role with respect to some of Fifth Third’s businesses. In 2014, Fifth Third Bank provisionally registered as a swap dealer with the CFTC and became subject to new substantive requirements, including real time trade reporting and robust record keeping requirements, business conduct requirements (including daily valuations, disclosure of material risks associated with swaps and disclosure of material incentives and conflicts of interest), and mandatory clearing and exchange trading of all standardized swaps designated by the relevant regulatory agencies as required to be cleared. Although the ultimate impact will depend on the promulgation of all final regulations, Fifth Third‘s derivatives activity will be subject to FRB margin requirements and may also be subject to capital requirements specific to this derivatives activity. These requirements will collectively impose implementation and ongoing compliance burdens on Fifth Third and will introduce additional legal risk (including as a result of newly applicable antifraud and anti-manipulation provisions and private rights of action). Once finalized, the rules may raise the costs and liquidity burden associated with Fifth Third’s derivatives activities and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become the subject of litigation or regulatory or other enforcement proceedings that could result in substantial legal liability and damage to Fifth Third’s reputation.

Fifth Third and certain of its directors and officers have been named from time to time as defendants in various class actions and other litigation relating to Fifth Third’s business and activities. Past, present and future litigation have included or could include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Enforcement authorities may seek admissions of wrongdoing and, in some cases, criminal pleas as part of the resolutions of matters, and any such resolution of a matter involving Fifth Third which could lead to increased exposure to private litigation, could adversely affect Fifth Third’s reputation, and could result in limitations on Fifth Third’s ability to do business in certain jurisdictions. Legal, regulatory and other enforcement proceedings could also result in

200  Fifth Third Bancorp


material adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief, amendments and/or restatements of Fifth Third’s SEC filings and/or financial statements, as applicable and/or determinations of material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, responding to inquiries, investigations, lawsuits and proceedings, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the matter, could be time-consuming and expensive. Like other large financial institutions and companies, Fifth Third is also subject to risk from potential employee misconduct, includingnon-compliance with policies and improper use or disclosure of confidential information. Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory or other enforcement action against Fifth Third could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations and/or cause significant reputational harm to its business. The outcome of lawsuits and regulatory proceedings may be difficult to predict or estimate. Although Fifth Third establishes accruals for legal proceedings when information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, Fifth Third does not have accruals for all legal proceedings where it faces a risk of loss. In addition, due to the inherent subjectivity of the assessments and unpredictability of the outcome of legal proceedings, amounts accrued may not represent the ultimate loss to Fifth Third from the legal proceedings in question. Thus, Fifth Third’s ultimate losses may be higher, and possibly significantly so, than the amounts accrued for legal loss contingencies, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s results of operations. Please see “Legal and Regulatory Proceedings” in Fifth Third’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on specific legal and regulatory proceedings.

Fifth Third’s ability to pay or increase dividends on its common stock or to repurchase its capital stock is restricted.

Fifth Third’s ability to pay dividends or repurchase stock is subject to regulatory requirements and the need to meet regulatory expectations. As part of CCAR, Fifth Third’s capital plan is subject to an annual assessment by the FRB, and the FRB may object to Fifth Third’s capital plan if Fifth Third does not demonstrate an ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine-quarter planning horizon. If the FRB objects to Fifth Third’s capital plan, Fifth Third would be subject to limitations on its ability to make capital distributions (including paying dividends and repurchasing stock).

201  Fifth Third Bancorp


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Bancorp’s executive offices and the main office of Fifth Third Bank are located on Fountain Square Plaza in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio in a32-story office tower, a five-story office building with an attached parking garage and a separateten-story office building known as the Fifth Third Center, the William S. Rowe Building and the 530 Building, respectively. The Bancorp’s main operations centercampus is located in Cincinnati, Ohio, inand is comprised of a three-story building with an attached parking garage known as the George A. Schaefer, Jr. Operations Center, and atwo-story building with surface parking known as the Madisonville Operations Center.Office Building. The Bank owns 100% of these buildings.

At December 31, 2014,2016, the Bancorp, through its banking andnon-banking subsidiaries, operated 1,3021,191 banking centers, of which 931859 were owned, 259229 were leased and 112103 for which the buildings are owned but the land is leased. The banking centers are located in the states of Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Florida, Tennessee, North Carolina, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Missouri, and Georgia. The Bancorp’s significant owned properties are owned free from mortgages and major encumbrances.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE BANCORP

Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors at the meeting of Directors immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The names, ages and positions of the Executive Officers of the Bancorp as of February 25,24, are listed below along with their business experience during the past 5five years:

Kevin T. KabatGreg D. Carmichael, 58. Vice Chairman of the Bancorp since September 2012 and55. Chief Executive Officer of the Bancorp since April 2007.November 2015 and President since September 2012. Previously, Mr. KabatCarmichael was Chief Operating Officer of the Bancorp from June 2006 to August 2015, Executive Vice President of the Bancorp from June 2006 to September 2012 and ChairmanChief Information Officer of the Bancorp from June 20082003 to June 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Kabat was2006.

Lars C. Anderson, 55. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bancorp since August 2015. Previously, Mr. Anderson was Vice Chairman of Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Bank since December 2003.2010.

Chad M. Borton, 44.46. Executive Vice President of the Bancorp since April 2014. Previously, Mr. Borton was Head of Retail Banking for Fifth Third Bank from July 2012 to April 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Borton served in multiple positions at JP Morgan Chase including the Head of Branch Administration from August 2011 to July 2012; Senior Vice President and Market Manager from August 2010 to August 2011; Head of Retail Distribution from 2008 to 2010 and Consumer Bank Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2008.

Greg D. Carmichael, 53. President of the Bancorp since September 2012 and Chief Operating Officer of the Bancorp since June 2006. Previously, Mr. Carmichael was the Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Bancorp since June 2003.

Frank R. Forrest, 60.62. Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Bancorp since April 2014. Previously, Mr. Forrest was Executive Vice President and Chief Risk and Credit Officer of the Bancorp since September 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Forrest served with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. From March 2012 until June 2013, Mr. Forrest served as Managing Director and Quality Control Executive for Legacy Asset Services, a division of Bank of America. From September 2008 until March 2012, Mr. Forrest was Managing Director and Global Debt Products Executive for Global Corporate and Investment Banking. Formerly from January 2007 to September 2008, Mr. Forrest was Risk Management Executive for Commercial Banking.

Mark D. Hazel, 49.51. Senior Vice President and Controller of the Bancorp since February 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Hazel was the Assistant Bancorp Controller since 2006 and was the Controller of Nonbank entities since 2003.

Gregory L. KoschAravind Immaneni, 55.46. Executive Vice President of the Bancorpand Chief Operations and Technology Officer since June 2005.November 14, 2016. Previously Mr. Kosch wasImmaneni worked for TD Bank as Executive Vice President and Head of Retail Distribution Strategy & Operations since November 2014, Senior Vice President

and headHead of the Bancorp’s Commercial Division in the Chicago affiliate since June 2002.Retail Bank Operations from August 2013 to November 2014, and Senior Vice President and Head of Deposit & Debit Operations from February 2011 to August 2013.

James C. Leonard, 45. Senior47.Executive Vice President since September 2015 and Treasurer of the Bancorp since October 2013. Previously, Mr. Leonard was Senior Vice President from October 2013 to September 2015, the Director of Business Planning and Analysis sincefrom 2006 to 2013 and was the Chief Financial Officer of the Commercial Banking Division since 2001.from 2001 to 2006.

Philip R. McHugh, 50,52. Executive Vice President of the Bancorp since December 2014. Previously, Mr. McHugh was Executive Vice President of Fifth Third Bank since June 2011 and was Senior Vice President of Fifth Third Bank from June 2010 through June 2011. Prior to that, Mr. McHugh was the President and CEO of the Louisville Affiliate of Fifth Third Bank from January 2005 through June 2010.

Daniel T. PostonJelena McWilliams, 56.43. Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since January 9, 2017. Previously Ms. McWilliams was Chief Counsel since January 2015 and Deputy Staff Director since July 2016 of the Bancorp since June 2003,U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Previously she was Senior Counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs from July 2012 to December 2015. Prior to that, she served as Assistant Chief Counsel to the U.S. Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee and before that as an attorney at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Prior to government service, she practiced as an attorney with Morrison & Foerster LLP in Palo Alto, California and then with Hogan & Hartson LLP (now Hogan Lovells LLP) in Washington, D.C.

Timothy N. Spence, 38. Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy and Administrative Officer of the Bancorp since October 2013.September 2015. Previously, Mr. PostonSpence was a senior partner in the Chief Financial Officer of the Bancorp from September 2009 to October 2013. Previously, Mr. Poston was the Controller of the Bancorp from July 2007 to May 2008Services practice at Oliver Wyman since 2006, a global strategy and from November 2008 to September 2009. Previously, Mr. Poston was the Chief Financial Officer of the Bancorp from May 2008 to November 2008. Formerly, Mr. Poston was the Auditor of the Bancorp since October 2001 and was Senior Vice President of the Bancorp and Fifth Third Bank since January 2002.risk management consulting firm.

Joseph R. RobinsonTeresa J. Tanner, 47.48. Executive Vice President and Chief InformationAdministrative Officer and Director of Information Technology and Operations of the Bancorp since September 2009.2015. Previously, Mr. RobinsonMs. Tanner was Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Bancorp since April 2008. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President and Director of Central Operations since November 2006 and Senior Vice President of IT Enterprise Solutions since March 2004.

Robert A. Sullivan, 60. Senior Executive Vice President of the Bancorp since December 2002.

Teresa J. Tanner, 46. Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Bancorp since February 2010. Previously, Ms. Tanner was2010 and Senior Vice President and Director of Enterprise Learning since September 2008. Prior to that, she was Human Resources Senior Vice President and Senior Business Partner for the Information Technology and Central Operations divisions since July 2006. Previously, she was Vice President and Senior Business Partner for Operations since September 2004.

Mary E. Tuuk, 50. Executive Vice President of Corporate Services & Board Secretary of the Bancorp since July 2013. Previously, Ms. Tuuk served as Affiliate President of Fifth Third Bank (Western Michigan) from November 2011 to June 2013. Prior to that, Ms. Tuuk was the Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Bancorp from June 2007 to October 2011 and from July 2013 through September 2013. Ms. Tuuk was Senior Vice President of Fifth Third Bancorp since 2003.

Tayfun Tuzun, 50. Executive Vice President

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules205-208

SIGNATURES

209

183  Fifth Third Bancorp


PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

General Information

Fifth Third Bancorp (the “Bancorp”), an Ohio corporation organized in 1975, is a bank holding company (“BHC”) as defined by the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and is registered as such with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”).

The Bancorp is a diversified financial services company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $142 billion in assets and operates 1,191 full-service Banking Centers, and 2,495 ATMs in Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Florida, Tennessee, West Virginia, Georgia and North Carolina. Fifth Third operates four main businesses: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending, and Wealth & Asset Management. Fifth Third also has a 17.9% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC. The carrying value of the Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC was $414 million as of December 31, 2016. Fifth Third is among the largest money managers in the Midwest and, as of December 31, 2016, had $315 billion in assets under care, of which it managed $31 billion for individuals, corporations andnot-for-profit organizations.Investor information andpress releases can be viewed atwww.53.com. Fifth Third’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ® Global Select Market under the symbol “FITB.”

The Bancorp’s subsidiaries provide a wide range of financial products and services to the retail, commercial, financial, governmental, educational, energy and medical sectors, including a wide variety of checking, savings and money market accounts, treasury management products, wealth management solutions, payments and commerce solutions, insurance services and credit products such as credit cards, installment loans, mortgage loans and leases. These products and services are delivered through a variety of channels and methods including the Company’s Banking Centers, other offices, telephone sales, the internet and mobile applications. Fifth Third Bank has deposit insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) through the Deposit Insurance Fund. Refer to Exhibit 21 filed as an attachment to this Annual Report on Form10-K for a list of subsidiaries of the Bancorp as of December 31, 2016.

The Bancorp derives the majority of its revenues from the U.S. Revenue from foreign countries and external customers domiciled in foreign countries is immaterial to the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additional information regarding the Bancorp’s businesses is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Availability of Financial Information

The Bancorp files reports with the SEC. Those reports include the annual report on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q, current reports on Form8-K and proxy statements, as well as any amendments to those reports. The public may read and copy any materials the Bancorp files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The Bancorp’s annual report on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form

10-Q, current reports onForm 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are accessible at no cost on the Bancorp’s web site at https://www.53.com on a same day basis after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Competition

The Bancorp competes for deposits, loans and other banking services in its principal geographic markets as well as in selected national markets as opportunities arise. In addition to traditional financial institutions, the Bancorp competes with securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors and insurance companies as well as financial technology companies. These companies compete across geographic boundaries and provide customers with meaningful alternatives to traditional banking services in nearly all significant products. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in technology, product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. These competitive trends are likely to continue.

Acquisitions and Investments

The Bancorp’s strategy for growth includes strengthening its presence in core markets, expanding into contiguous markets and broadening its product offerings while taking into account the integration and other risks of growth. The Bancorp evaluates strategic acquisition and investment opportunities and conducts due diligence activities in connection with possible transactions. As a result, discussions, and in some cases, negotiations may take place and future acquisitions involving cash, debt or equity securities may occur. These typically involve the payment of a premium over book value and current market price, and therefore, some dilution of book value and net income per share may occur with any future transactions.

Regulation and Supervision

In addition to the generally applicable state and federal laws governing businesses and employers, the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to extensive regulation by federal and state laws and regulations applicable to financial institutions and their parent companies. Virtually all aspects of the business of the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to specific requirements or restrictions and general regulatory oversight. The principal objectives of state and federal banking laws and regulations and the supervision, regulation and examination of banks and their parent companies (such as the Bancorp) by bank regulatory agencies are the maintenance of the safety and soundness of financial institutions, maintenance of the federal deposit insurance system and the protection of consumers or classes of consumers, rather than the specific protection of shareholders of a bank or the parent company of a bank. The Bancorp and its subsidiaries are subject to an extensive regulatory framework of complex and comprehensive federal and state laws and regulations addressing the provision of banking and other financial services and other aspects of the Bancorp’s businesses and operations. Regulation and regulatory oversight have increased significantly since 2010 as a result of the passage of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “DFA”).

184  Fifth Third Bancorp


The DFA imposes regulatory requirements and oversight over banks and other financial institutions in a number of ways, among which are (i) creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) to regulate consumer financial products and services; (ii) creating the Financial Stability Oversight Council to identify and impose additional regulatory oversight on large financial firms; (iii) granting orderly liquidation authority to the FDIC for the liquidation of financial corporations that pose a risk to the financial system of the U.S.; (iv) requiring financial institutions to draft a resolution plan that contemplates the dissolution of the enterprise and submit that resolution plan to both the Federal Reserve and the FDIC; (v) limiting debit card interchange fees; (vi) adopting certain changes to shareholder rights and responsibilities, including a shareholder “say on pay” vote on executive compensation; (vii) strengthening the SEC’s powers to regulate securities markets; (viii) regulating OTC derivative markets; (ix) restricting variable-rate lending by requiring the ability to repay to be determined for variable-rate loans by using the maximum rate that will apply during the first five years of a variable-rate loan term, and making more loans subject to provisions for higher cost loans, new disclosures, and certain other revisions; (x) changing the base upon which the deposit insurance assessment is assessed from deposits to, substantially, average consolidated assets minus equity; and (xi) amending the Truth in Lending Act with respect to mortgage originations, including originator compensation, minimum repayment standards, and prepayment considerations. To the extent the following material describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statute or regulation. In addition, due to the volume of regulations required by the DFA, not all proposed or final regulations that may have an impact on the Bancorp or its banking subsidiary are necessarily discussed.

Regulators

The Bancorp and/or its banking subsidiary are subject to regulation and supervision primarily by the FRB, the CFPB and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions (the “Division”) and additionally by certain other functional regulators and self-regulatory organizations. The Bancorp is also subject to regulation by the SEC by virtue of its status as a public company and due to the nature of some of its businesses. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to regulation by the FDIC, which insures the bank’s deposits as permitted by law.

The federal and state laws and regulations that are applicable to banks and to BHCs regulate, among other matters, the scope of their business, their activities, their investments, their capital and liquidity levels, their reserves against deposits, the timing of the availability of deposited funds, the amount of loans to individual and related borrowers and the nature, the amount of and collateral for certain loans, and the amount of interest that may be charged on loans as applicable. Various federal and state consumer laws and regulations also affect the services provided to consumers.

The Bancorp and/or its banking subsidiary are required to file various reports with, and is subject to examination by regulators, including the FRB and the Division. The FRB, the Division and the CFPB have the authority to issue orders for BHCs and/or banks to cease and desist from certain banking practices and violations of conditions imposed by, or violations of agreements with, the FRB, the Division and the CFPB. Certain of the Bancorp’s and/or its banking subsidiary regulators are also empowered to assess civil money penalties against companies or individuals in certain situations, such as when there is a violation of a law or regulation.

Applicable state and federal laws also grant certain regulators the authority to impose additional requirements and restrictions on the activities of the Bancorp and or its banking subsidiary and, in some situations, the imposition of such additional requirements and restrictions will not be publicly available information.

Acquisitions

The BHCA requires the prior approval of the FRB for a BHC to acquire substantially all the assets of a bank or to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of the voting shares of any bank, BHC or savings association, or to increase any suchnon-majority ownership or control of any bank, BHC or savings association, or to merge or consolidate with any BHC.

The BHCA prohibits a BHC from acquiring a direct or indirect interest in or control of more than 5% of any class of the voting shares of a company that is not a bank or a BHC and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to its banking subsidiaries, except that it may engage in and may own shares of companies engaged in certain activities the FRB has determined to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be proper incident thereto.

Financial Holding Companies

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“GLBA”) permits a qualifying BHC to become a financial holding company (“FHC”) and thereby to engage directly or indirectly in a broader range of activities than those permitted for a BHC under the BHCA. Permitted activities for a FHC include securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting and brokerage, merchant banking and other activities that are declared by the FRB, in cooperation with the Treasury Department, to be “financial in nature or incidental thereto” or are declared by the FRB unilaterally to be “complementary” to financial activities. In addition, a FHC is allowed to conduct permissible new financial activities or acquire permissiblenon-bank financial companies withafter-the-fact notice to the FRB. A BHC may elect to become a FHC if each of its banking subsidiaries is well capitalized, is well managed and has at least a “Satisfactory” rating under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”). The DFA also extended the well capitalized and well managed requirement to the BHC. In 2000, the Bancorp elected and qualified for FHC status under the GLBA. To maintain FHC status, a holding company must continue to meet certain requirements. The failure to meet such requirements could result in material restrictions on the activities of the FHC and may also adversely affect the FHC’s ability to enter into certain transactions or obtain necessary approvals in connection therewith, as well as loss of FHC status. If restrictions are imposed on the activities of an FHC, such information may not necessarily be available to the public.

Dividends

The Bancorp depends in part upon dividends received from its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including its indirect banking subsidiary, to fund its activities, including the payment of dividends. The Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to various federal and state restrictions on their ability to pay dividends. The FRB has authority to prohibit BHCs from paying dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice.

185  Fifth Third Bancorp


The FRB has indicated generally that it may be an unsafe or unsound practice for BHCs to pay dividends unless a BHC’s net income is sufficient to fund the dividends and the expected rate of earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The ability to pay dividends may be further limited by provisions of the DFA and implanting regulations (see Systematically Significant Companies and Capital).

Source of Strength

Under long-standing FRB policy and now as codified in the DFA, a BHC is expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its banking subsidiaries and to commit resources to their support. This support may be required at times when the BHC may not have the resources to provide it.

FDIC Assessments

Pursuant to the DFA, in 2011 the FDIC revised the framework by which insured depository institutions with more than $10 billion in assets (“large IDIs”) are assessed for purposes of payments to the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”).

Prior to the passage of the DFA, a large IDI’s DIF premiums principally were based on the size of an IDI’s domestic deposit base. The DFA changed the assessment base from a large IDI’s domestic deposit base to its total assets less tangible equity. In addition to potentially greatly increasing the size of a large IDI’s assessment base, the expansion of the assessment base affords the FDIC much greater flexibility to vary its assessment system based upon the different asset classes that large IDIs normally hold on their balance sheets.

To implement this provision, the FDIC created an assessment scheme vastly different from the deposit-based system. Under the new system, large IDIs are assessed under a complex “scorecard” methodology that seeks to capture both the probability that an individual large IDI will fail and the magnitude of the impact on the DIF if such a failure occurs.

During the first quarter of 2016, the FDIC issued a final rule implementing a 4.5 bps surcharge on the quarterly FDIC insurance assessments of insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more. The Bancorp became subject to the FDIC surcharge and reduced regular FDIC insurance assessments on July 1, 2016. The surcharges will continue through the quarter that the DIF reserve ratio first reaches or exceeds 1.35% of insured deposits, but not later than December 31, 2018. If the reserve ratio does not reach 1.35% by December 31, 2018, the FDIC will impose a shortfall assessment on March 31, 2019, on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more.

Transactions with Affiliates

Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, restrict transactions between a bank and its affiliates (as defined in Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act), including a parent BHC. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to certain restrictions, including but not limited to restrictions on loans to its affiliates, on investments in the stock or securities thereof, on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower, and on the issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on their behalf. Among other things, these restrictions limit the amount of such transactions, require collateral in prescribed amounts for extensions of credit, prohibit the purchase of low quality assets and require that the terms of such transactions be substantially equivalent to terms of comparable transactions withnon-affiliates. Generally, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is limited in its extension of credit to any affiliate to 10% of the banking subsidiary’s capital stock and surplus and its extension of credit to all affiliates to 20% of the banking subsidiary’s capital stock and surplus.

Community Reinvestment Act

The CRA generally requires insured depository institutions, including the Bank, to identify the communities they serve and to make loans and investments and provide services that meet the credit needs of those communities and the CRA requires the FRB to evaluate the performance of such depository institutions with respect to these CRA obligations. Depository institutions must maintain comprehensive records of their CRA activities for purposes of these examinations. The FRB must take into account the record of performance of depository institutions in meeting the credit needs of the entire community served, includinglow- and moderate-income neighborhoods. For purposes of CRA examinations, the FRB rates such institutions’ compliance with the CRA as “Outstanding,” “Satisfactory,” “Needs to Improve” or “Substantial Noncompliance.” The Bank must be well-capitalized, well-managed and maintain at least a “Satisfactory” CRA rating for the Bancorp to retain its status as a financial holding company. Failure to meet these requirements could result in the FRB placing limitations or conditions on the Bancorp’s activities (and the commencement of new activities, including merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions) and could ultimately result in the loss of financial holding company status. The FRB conducted a regularly scheduled examination covering 2011 through 2013 to determine the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary’s compliance with the CRA. This CRA examination resulted in a rating of “Needs to Improve”. The Bank believes that the “Needs to Improve” rating reflects legacy issues that have been remediated during the intervening three years. While the Bank’s CRA rating is “Needs to Improve” the Bancorp and the Bank face limitations and conditions on certain activities, including the commencement of new activities and merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions. The Bank’s next CRA examination commenced during the fourth quarter of 2016.

Capital Generally

The FRB has established capital guidelines for BHCs and FHCs. The FRB, the Division and the FDIC have also issued regulations establishing capital requirements for banks. Failure to meet capital requirements could subject the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary to a variety of restrictions and enforcement actions. In addition, as discussed previously, the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary must remain well capitalized and well managed for the Bancorp to retain its status as a FHC.

Systemically Significant Companies and Capital

Title I of the DFA created a new regulatory regime for large BHCs. U.S. BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, including Fifth Third, are subject to enhanced prudential standards and early remediation requirements under Title I. Title I of the DFA established a broad framework for identifying, applying heightened supervision and regulation to, and (as necessary) limiting the size and activities of systemically significant financial companies.

The DFA required the FRB to impose enhanced capital and risk-management standards on these firms and mandated the FRB to conduct annual stress tests on all BHCs with $50 billion or more in assets to determine whether they have adequate capital available to absorb losses in baseline, adverse, or severely adverse economic conditions. In November 2011, the FRB adopted final rules requiring BHCs with $50 billion or more in consolidated assets to submit capital plans to the FRB on an annual basis.

186  Fifth Third Bancorp


Under the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process, the FRB annually evaluates an institution’s capital adequacy, internal capital adequacy, assessment processes and capital distribution plans such as dividend payments and stock repurchases. Banks are also required to report certain data to the FRB on a quarterly basis to allow the FRB to monitor progress against the approved capital plans.

The CCAR process is intended to help ensure that BHCs have robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for each company’s unique risks and that permit continued operations during times of economic and financial stress. The mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected uses and sources of capital over a nine-quarter planning horizon, a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon, a discussion of any expected changes to the Bancorp’s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity, a detailed description of the Bancorp’s process for assessing capital adequacy and the Bancorp’s capital policy. The stress tests require increased involvement by boards of directors in stress testing and public disclosure of the results of both the FRB’s annual stress tests and a BHC’s annual supervisory stress tests, and semi-annual internal stress tests.

In 2014, the FRB amended its capital planning and stress testing rules to, among other things, generally limit a BHC’s ability to make quarterly capital distributions – that is, dividends and share repurchases – commencing April 1, 2015 if the amount of the bank’s actual cumulative quarterly capital issuances of instruments that qualify as regulatory capital are less than the bank had indicated in its submitted capital plan as to which it received anon-objection from the FRB. For example, if the BHC issued a smaller amount of additional common stock than it had stated in its capital plan, it would be required to reduce common dividends and/or the amount of common stock repurchases so that the dollar amount of capital distributions, net of the dollar amount of additional common stock issued (“net distributions”), is no greater than the dollar amount of net distributions relating to its common stock included in its capital plan, as measured on an aggregate basis beginning in the third quarter of the nine-quarter planning horizon through the end of the then current quarter. However, not raising sufficient amounts of common stock as planned would not affect distributions related to Additional Tier I Capital instruments and/ or Tier II Capital. These limitations also contain several important qualifications and exceptions, including that scheduled dividend payments on (as opposed to repurchases of) a BHC’s Additional Tier I Capital and Tier II Capital instruments are not restricted if the BHC fails to issue a sufficient amount of such instruments as planned, as well as provisions for certain de minimis excess distributions. BHCs with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more are required to submit their 2017 capital plan to the FRB by April 5, 2017.

In December of 2010 and revised in June of 2011, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) issued Basel III, a global regulatory framework, to enhance international capital standards. Basel III is designed to materially improve the quality of regulatory capital and introduces a new minimum common equity requirement. Basel III also raises the minimum capital requirements and introduces capital conservation and countercyclical buffers to induce banking organizations to hold capital in excess of regulatory minimums. In addition, Basel III establishes an international leverage standard for internationally active banks.

In July of 2013, U.S. banking regulators approved the final enhanced regulatory capital rules (“Final Capital Rules”). The Final Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to BHCs and their depository institution subsidiaries as compared to the previous U.S. risk-based capital and leverage ratio rules, and thereby implement certain provisions of the DFA.

The Final Capital Rules, among other things, (i) introduce a new capital measure “Common Equity Tier I” (“CET1”), (ii) specify that Tier I capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier I capital” instruments meeting specified requirements, (iii) define CET1 narrowly by requiring that most adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital and (iv) expand the scope of the adjustments as compared to existing regulations. CET1 capital consists of common stock instruments that meet the eligibility criteria in the final rules, including; common stock and related surplus, net of treasury stock and retained earnings, certain minority interests and accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), if elected.

When fullyphased-in on January 1, 2019, the Final Capital Rules require banking organizations to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% CET1 ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0% upon full implementation), (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier I capital ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum Tier I capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation), (iii) a minimum ratio of total capital (that is, Tier I plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation) and (iv) a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier I capital to adjusted average consolidated assets.

Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer will face limitations on the payment of dividends, common stock repurchases and discretionary cash payments to executive officers based on the amount of the shortfall.

The Final Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets dependent upon future taxable income and significant investments innon-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Under the Final Capital Rules, the Bancorp made aone-time election (the“Opt-out Election”) to filter certain AOCI components, comparable to the treatment under the current general risk-based capital rule.

The Final Capital Rules were effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject tophase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions. Although not currently required, Fifth Third Bancorp believes the aforementioned capital ratios under the revised Final Capital Rules meet or exceed the ratios on a fullyphased-in basis. Refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A for an estimated CET1 capital ratio under the Basel III Final Rule (fullyphased-in) as of December 31, 2016.

187  Fifth Third Bancorp


In February 2014, the FRB approved a final rule implementing several heightened prudential requirements. The rules require BHCs with $10 billion or more in consolidated assets to establish risk committees and require BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets to comply with enhanced liquidity and overall risk management standards, includingcompany-run liquidity stress testing and a buffer of highly liquid assets based on projected funding needs for various time horizons, including 30, 60, and 90 days. These liquidity-related provisions are designed to be complementary, and in addition to the Final LCR Rule applicable to BHCs (as discussed below). Rules to implement two other components of the DFA’s enhanced prudential standards –single-counterparty credit limits and early remediation requirements– are still under consideration by the FRB. Fifth Third has conducted a self evaluation of all the requirements within the enhanced prudential standards, and believe the necessary steps have been taken to ensure compliance with all requirements regarding liquidity, risk exposures, and early remediation.

Liquidity Regulation

Liquidity risk management and supervision have become increasingly important since the financial crisis. On September 3, 2014, the FRB and other banking regulators adopted final rules (“Final LCR Rule”) implementing a U.S. version of the Basel Committee’s Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirement (“LCR”), which is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a30-day time horizon (or, if greater, 25% of its expected total cash outflow) under an acute liquidity stress scenario. The rules apply in modified form to banking organizations, such as the Bancorp, having $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets but less than $250 billion. The LCR is the ratio of an institution’s stock of HQLA (the numerator) over projected net cashout-flows over the30-day horizon (the denominator), in each case, as calculated pursuant to the Final LCR Rule. Once fullyphased-in, a subject institution must maintain an LCR equal to at least 100% in order to satisfy this regulatory requirement. Only specific classes of assets, including U.S. Treasuries, other U.S. government obligations and agency mortgaged-backed securities, qualify under the rule as HQLA, with classes of assets deemed relatively less liquid and/or subject to greater degree of credit risk subject to certain haircuts and caps for purposes of calculating the numerator under the Final LCR Rule. The total net cash outflows amount is determined under the rule by applying certain hypothetical outflow and inflow rates, which reflect certain standardized stressed assumptions, against the balances of the banking organization’s funding sources, obligations, transactions and assets over the30-day stress period. Inflows that can be included to offset outflows are limited to 75% of outflows (which effectively means that banking organizations must hold high-quality liquid assets equal to 25% of outflows even if outflows perfectly match inflows over the stress period). The total net cash outflow amount for the modified LCR applicable to the Bancorp is capped at 70% of the outflow rate that applies to the full LCR.

The initial compliance date for the modified LCR was January 31, 2016, with the requirement fullyphased-in on January 1, 2017. The LCR is a minimum requirement, and the FRB can impose additional liquidity requirements as a supervisory matter.

In addition, the Bancorp is also subject to the liquidity-related requirements of the enhanced prudential supervision rules adopted by the FRB under Section 165 of the DFA, as described above. As of December 31, 2016, the Bancorp’s modified LCR complied with the fullyphased-in LCR requirements which became effective on January 1, 2017.

In addition to the LCR, the Basel III framework also included a second standard, referred to as the net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”), which is designed to promote moremedium-and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banks over aone-year time horizon. In May, 2016, the federal banking agencies proposed an NSFR Rule. As proposed the most stringent requirements would apply to firms with $250 billion or more in assets or $10 billion or more inon-balance sheet foreign exposure. Holding companies with less than $250 billion, but more than $50 billion in assets and less than $10 billion inon-balance foreign exposure, such as the Bancorp, would be subject to a less stringent, modified NFSR requirement.

Privacy

The FRB, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies have adopted final guidelines (the “Guidelines) for safeguarding confidential, personal customer information. The Guidelines require each financial institution, under the supervision and ongoing oversight of its Board of Directors or an appropriate committee thereof, to create, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer. The Bancorp has adopted a customer information security program that has been approved by the Bancorp’s Board of Directors.

The GLBA requires financial institutions to implement policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about consumers tonon-affiliated third parties. In general, the statute requires explanations to consumers on policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of such nonpublic personal information, and, except as otherwise required by law, prohibits disclosing such information except as provided in the banking subsidiary’s policies and procedures. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary has implemented a privacy policy.

Anti-Money Laundering

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”), designed to deny terrorists and others the ability to obtain access to the United States financial system, has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act, as implemented by various federal regulatory agencies, requires financial institutions, including the Bancorp and its subsidiaries, to implement new policies and procedures or amend existing policies and procedures with respect to, among other matters, anti-money laundering, compliance, suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on customers. The Patriot Act and its underlying regulations also permit information sharing for counter-terrorist purposes between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions, subject to certain conditions, and require the FRB (and other federal banking agencies) to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering activities when considering applications filed under Section 3 of the BHCA or the Bank Merger Act. The Bancorp’s Board has approved policies and procedures that are believed to be compliant with the Patriot Act.

188  Fifth Third Bancorp


Exempt Brokerage Activities

The GLBA amended the federal securities laws to eliminate the blanket exceptions that banks traditionally have had from the definition of “broker” and “dealer.” The GLBA also required that there be certain transactional activities that would not be “brokerage” activities, which banks could effect without having to register as a broker. In September 2007, the FRB and SEC approved Regulation R to govern bank securities activities. Various exemptions permit banks to conduct activities that would otherwise constitute brokerage activities under the securities laws. Those exemptions include conducting brokerage activities related to trust, fiduciary and similar services, certain services and also conducting a de minimis number of riskless principal transactions, certain asset-backed transactions and certain securities lending transactions. The Bancorp only conductsnon-exempt brokerage activities through its affiliated registered broker-dealer.

Financial Stability Oversight Council

The DFA created the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), which is chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury and composed of expertise from various financial services regulators. The FSOC has responsibility for identifying risks and responding to emerging threats to financial stability.

Executive Compensation

The DFA provides for a say on pay for shareholders of all public companies. Under the DFA, each company must give its shareholders the opportunity to vote on the compensation of its executives at least once every three years. The DFA also adds disclosure and voting requirements for golden parachute compensation that is payable to named executive officers in connection with sale transactions. The SEC adopted rules finalizing these say on pay provisions in January 2011.

Pursuant to the DFA, in June 2012, the SEC adopted a final rule directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing classes of equity securities if a company’s compensation committee members are not independent. The rule also provides that a company’s compensation committee may only select a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor after taking into consideration factors to be identified by the SEC that affect the independence of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor.

The SEC is required under the DFA to issue rules obligating companies to disclose in proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders information that shows the relationship between executive compensation actually paid to their named executive officers and their financial performance, taking into account any change in the value of the shares of a company’s stock and dividends or distributions. The DFA also requires the SEC to propose rules requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the compensation of its chief executive officer to the median compensation of its employees. The SEC adopted final rules implementing the pay ratio provisions in August 2015. For a registrant with a fiscal year ending on December 31, such as Bancorp, the pay ratio will be required as part of its executive compensation disclosure in proxy statements or Form10-Ks filed starting in 2018.

The DFA provides that the SEC must issue rules directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing any security of a company unless the company develops and implements a policy providing for disclosure of the policy of the company on incentive-based compensation that is based on financial information required to be reported under the securities laws and that, in the event the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the company will recover from any current or former executive officer of the company who received incentive-based compensation during the three-year period preceding the date on which the company is required to prepare the restatement based on the erroneous data, any exceptional compensation above what would have been paid under the restatement.

The DFA requires the SEC to adopt a rule to require that each company disclose in the proxy materials for its annual meetings whether an employee or board member is permitted to purchase financial instruments designed to hedge or offset decreases in the market value of equity securities granted as compensation or otherwise held by the employee or board member.

In June 2016, the SEC and the federal banking agencies issued a proposed rule to implement the incentive-based compensation provisions of section 956 of the DFA. The proposal would establish new requirements for incentive-based compensation at institutions with assets of at least $1 billion.

Corporate Governance

The DFA clarifies that the SEC may, but is not required to promulgate rules that would require that a company’s proxy materials include a nominee for the board of directors submitted by a shareholder. Although the SEC promulgated rules to accomplish this, these rules were invalidated by a federal appeals court decision. The SEC has said that they will not challenge the ruling, but has not ruled out the possibility that new rules could be proposed.

The DFA requires stock exchanges to have rules prohibiting their members from voting securities that they do not beneficially own (unless they have received voting instructions from the beneficial owner) with respect to the election of a member of the board of directors (other than an uncontested election of directors of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940), executive compensation or any other significant matter, as determined by the SEC by rule.

Debit Card Interchange Fees

The DFA provides for a set of new rules requiring that interchange transaction fees for electric debit transactions be “reasonable” and proportional to certain costs associated with processing the transactions. The FRB was given authority to, among other things, establish standards for assessing whether interchange fees are reasonable and proportional. In June 2011, the FRB issued a final rule establishing certain standards and prohibitions pursuant to the DFA, including establishing standards for debit card interchange fees and allowing for an upward adjustment if the issuer develops and implements policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent fraud. The provisions regarding debit card interchange fees and the fraud adjustment became effective October 1, 2011. The rules impose requirements on the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary and may negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.

189  Fifth Third Bancorp


On July 31, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs in a case challenging certain provisions of the FRB’s rule concerning electronic debit card transaction fees and network exclusivity arrangements (the “Current Rule”) that were adopted to implement Section 1075 of the DFA, known as the Durbin Amendment. The Court held that, in adopting the Current Rule, the FRB violated the Durbin Amendment’s provisions concerning which costs are allowed to be taken into account for purposes of setting fees that are reasonable and proportional to the costs incurred by the issuer and therefore the Current Rule’s maximum permissible fees were too high. In addition, the Court held that the Current Rule’s networknon-exclusivity provisions concerning unaffiliated payment networks for debit cards also violated the Durbin Amendment. The Court vacated the Current Rule, but stayed its ruling to provide the FRB an opportunity to replace the invalidated portions. The FRB appealed this decision and on March 21, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. The merchants have filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, on January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the Circuit Court reversal, thereby largely upholding the Current Rule and substantially reducing uncertainty surrounding debit card interchange fees the Bancorp is permitted to charge.

FDIC Matters and Resolution Planning

Title II of the DFA creates an orderly liquidation process that the FDIC can employ for failing systemically important financial companies. Additionally, the DFA also codifies many of the temporary changes that had already been implemented, such as permanently increasing the amount of deposit insurance to $250,000.

In January 2012, the FDIC issued a final rule that requires an insured depository institution with $50 billion or more in total assets to submit periodic contingency plans to the FDIC for resolution in the event of the institution’s failure. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to this rule and submitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of December 31, 2015.

In October 2011, the FRB and FDIC issued a final rule implementing the resolution planning requirements of Section 165(d) of the DFA. The final rule requires BHCs with assets of $50 billion or more and nonbank financial firms designated by FSOC for supervision by the FRB to annually submit resolution plans to the FDIC and FRB. Each plan shall describe the company’s strategy for rapid and orderly resolution in bankruptcy during times of financial distress.    Under the final rule, companies must submit their initial resolution plans on a staggered basis. The Bancorp submitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of December 31, 2015. In August 2016, the FDIC and the FRB announced that 38 firms, including Fifth Third, will be required to submit their next resolutions by December 31, 2017.

Proprietary Trading and Investing in Certain Funds

The DFA sets forth new restrictions on banking organizations’ ability to engage in proprietary trading and sponsors of or invest in private equity and hedge funds (the “Volcker Rule”). The final regulations implementing the Volcker Rule (“Final Rules”) were adopted on December 10, 2013. The Volcker Rule generally prohibits any banking entity from (i) engaging in short-term proprietary trading for its own account and (ii) sponsoring or

acquiring any ownership interest in a private equity or hedge fund. The Volcker Rule and Final Rules contain a number of exceptions. The Volcker Rule permits transactions in the securities of the U.S. government and its agencies, certain government-sponsored enterprises and states and their political subdivisions, as well as certain investments in small business investment companies. Transactions on behalf of customers and in connection with certain underwriting and market making activities, as well as risk-mitigating hedging activities and certain foreign banking activities are also permitted. The Final Rules exclude certain funds from the prohibition on fund ownership and sponsorship including wholly-owned subsidiaries, joint ventures, and acquisitions vehicles, as well as SEC registered investment companies.De minimis ownership of private equity or hedge funds is also permitted under the Final Rules. In addition to the general prohibition on sponsorship and investment, the Volcker rule contains additional requirements applicable to any private equity or hedge fund that is sponsored by the banking entity or for which it serves as investment manager or investment advisor. The Bancorp is required under the Final Rules to demonstrate that it has a Volcker Rule compliance program. Further, with respect to covered funds that are “illiquid funds”, the FRB has the authority to grant up to five more years for the Bancorp to conform to the final Volcker Rule with respect to such illiquid funds.

Derivatives

Title VII of the DFA includes measures to broaden the scope of derivative instruments subject to regulation by requiring clearing and exchange trading of certain derivatives, imposing new capital and margin requirements for certain market participants and imposing position limits on certainover-the-counter derivatives. Fifth Third Bank is provisionally registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a swap dealer. As with the Volcker Rule, the Bank is required to demonstrate that it has a satisfactory compliance program to monitor its activities under these regulations. Certain regulations implementing Title VII of the DFA have not been finalized. The ultimate impact of these regulations, and the time it will take to comply, continues to remain uncertain. The final regulations may impose additional operational and compliance costs on us and may require us to restructure certain businesses and negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.

Future Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives

Federal and state legislators as well as regulatory agencies may introduce or enact new laws and rules, or amend existing laws and rules, that may affect the regulation of financial institutions and their holding companies. The impact of any future legislative or regulatory changes cannot be predicted. However, such changes could affect Bancorp’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

190  Fifth Third Bancorp


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The risks listed below present risks that could have a material impact on the Bancorp’s financial condition, the results of its operations, or its business. Some of these risks are interrelated, and the occurrence of one or more of them may exacerbate the effect of others.

RISKS RELATING TO ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS

Weakness in the U.S. economy, including within Fifth Third’s geographic footprint, has adversely affected Fifth Third in the past and may adversely affect Fifth Third in the future.

If the strength of the U.S. economy in general or the strength of the local economies in which Fifth Third conducts operations declines, this could result in, among other things, a decreased demand for Fifth Third’s products and services, a deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit, including a resultant effect on Fifth Third’s loan portfolio and ALLL and in the receipt of lower proceeds from the sale of loans and foreclosed properties. These factors could result in higher delinquencies, greater charge-offs and increased losses in future periods, which could materially adversely affect Fifth Third’s financial condition and results of operations.

Global financial conditions could hamper economic recovery or contribute to recessionary economic conditions and severe stress in the financial markets, including in the United States. Should the U.S. economy be adversely impacted by these factors, the likelihood for loan and asset growth at U.S. financial institutions, like Fifth Third, may deteriorate.

The global financial markets continue to be strained as a result of economic slowdowns, geopolitical concerns and the related path of commodity prices and interest rates. Divergence in economic growth in the U.S. and international economies and the resulting differences in monetary policy are placing strains on financial markets and strengthening the U.S. dollar. The relative strength of the U.S. dollar may continue to negatively impact the U.S. manufacturing sector. These factors could negatively impact the U.S. economy and affect the stability of global financial markets.

Changes in interest rates could affect Fifth Third’s income and cash flows.

Fifth Third’s income and cash flows depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and investment securities, and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond Fifth Third’s control, including general economic conditions in the U.S. or abroad and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies (in particular, the FRB). Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence the origination of loans, the prepayment speed of loans, the purchase of investments, the generation of deposits and the rates received on loans and investment securities and paid on deposits or other sources of funding. The impact of these changes may be magnified if Fifth Third does not effectively manage the relative sensitivity of its assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. Fluctuations in these areas may adversely affect Fifth Third and its shareholders.

Changes and trends in the capital markets may affect Fifth Third’s income and cash flows.

Fifth Third enters into and maintains trading and investment positions in the capital markets on its own behalf and manages investment positions on behalf of its customers. These investment positions include derivative financial instruments. The revenues and profits Fifth Third derives from managing proprietary and customer trading and investment positions are dependent on market prices. Market changes and trends may result in a decline in wealth and asset management revenue or investment or trading losses that may impact Fifth Third. Losses on behalf of its customers could expose Fifth Third to litigation, credit risks or loss of revenue from those clients and customers. Additionally, losses in Fifth Third’s trading and investment positions could lead to a loss with respect to those investments and may adversely affect Fifth Third’s income, cash flows and funding costs.

Problems encountered by financial institutions larger than or similar to Fifth Third could adversely affect financial markets generally and have direct and indirect adverse effects on Fifth Third.

Fifth Third has exposure to counterparties in the financial services industry and other industries, and routinely executes transactions with such counterparties, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds, and other institutional clients. Many of Fifth Third’s transactions with other financial institutions expose Fifth Third to credit risk in the event of default of a counterparty or client. In addition, Fifth Third’s credit risk may be affected when the collateral it holds cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure. The commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely interrelated as a result of credit, trading, clearing or other relationships between the institutions. As a result, concerns about, or a default or threatened default by, one institution could lead to significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems, losses or defaults by other institutions. This is sometimes referred to as “systemic risk” and may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, clearing houses, banks, securities firms and exchanges, with which the Bancorp interacts on a daily basis, and therefore could adversely affect Fifth Third.

Fifth Third’s stock price is volatile.

Fifth Third’s stock price has been volatile in the past and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include, without limitation:

Actual or anticipated variations in earnings;

Changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections;

Fifth Third’s announcements of developments related to its businesses;

Operating and Chief Financial Officerstock performance of other companies deemed to be peers;

Actions by government regulators and changes in the Bancorp since October 2013. Previously, Mr. Tuzun wasregulatory regime;

New technology used or services offered by traditional andnon-traditional competitors;

News reports of trends, concerns and other issues related to the Senior Vice Presidentfinancial services industry;

U.S. and Treasurerglobal economic conditions;

Natural disasters;

Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of terrorism, military conflicts and withdrawal from the Bancorp from December 2011EU by the U.K. or other EU members.

191  Fifth Third Bancorp


The price for shares of Fifth Third’s common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to Fifth Third’s performance. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price for shares of Fifth Third’s common stock, and the current market price of such shares may not be indicative of future market prices.

RISKS RELATING TO FIFTH THIRD’S GENERAL BUSINESS

Changes in retail distribution strategies and consumer behavior may adversely impact Fifth Third’s investments in its bank premises and equipment and other assets and may lead to increased expenditures to change its retail distribution channel.

Fifth Third has significant investments in bank premises and equipment for its branch network including its 1,191 full-service banking centers, 50 parcels of land held for the development of future banking centers and 10 properties that are developed or in the process of being developed as branches, as well as its retail work force and other branch banking assets. Advances in technology such ase-commerce, telephone, internet and mobile banking, andin-branch self-service technologies including automatic teller machines and other equipment, as well as changing customer preferences for these other methods of accessing Fifth Third’s products and services, could affect the value of Fifth Third’s branch network or other retail distribution assets and may cause it to change its retail distribution strategy, close and/or sell certain branches or parcels of land held for development and restructure or reduce its remaining branches and work force. Further advances in technology and/or changes in customer preferences could have additional changes in Fifth Third’s retail distribution strategy and/or branch network. These actions could lead to losses on these assets or could adversely impact the carrying value of other long-lived assets and may lead to increased expenditures to renovate and reconfigure remaining branches or to otherwise reform its retail distribution channel.

Deteriorating credit quality has adversely impacted Fifth Third in the past and may adversely impact Fifth Third in the future.

When Fifth Third lends money or commits to lend money the Bancorp incurs credit risk or the risk of loss if borrowers do not repay their loans. The credit performance of the loan portfolios significantly affects the Bancorp’s financial results and condition. If the current economic environment were to deteriorate, more customers may have difficulty in repaying their loans or other obligations which could result in a higher level of credit losses and reserves for credit losses. Fifth Third reserves for credit losses by establishing reserves through a charge to earnings. The amount of these reserves is based on Fifth Third’s assessment of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio including unfunded credit commitments. The process for determining the amount of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments is critical to Fifth Third’s financial results and condition. It requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments about the environment, including analysis of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of borrowers to repay their loans.

Fifth Third might underestimate the credit losses inherent in its loan portfolio and have credit losses in excess of the amount reserved. Fifth Third might increase the reserve because of

changing economic conditions, including falling home prices or higher unemployment, or other factors such as changes in borrower’s behavior. As an example, borrowers may “strategically default,” or discontinue making payments on their real estate-secured loans if the value of the real estate is less than what they owe, even if they are still financially able to make the payments.

Fifth Third believes that both the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments are adequate to cover inherent losses at December 31, 2016; however, there is no assurance that they will be sufficient to cover future credit losses, especially if housing and employment conditions decline. In the event of significant deterioration in economic conditions, Fifth Third may be required to increase reserves in future periods, which would reduce earnings.

For more information, refer to the Credit Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A and the Allowance for Loan and Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments subsections of the Critical Accounting Policies section of MD&A.

Fifth Third must maintain adequate sources of funding and liquidity.

Fifth Third must maintain adequate funding sources in the normal course of business to support its operations and fund outstanding liabilities, as well as meet regulatory expectations. Fifth Third primarily relies on bank deposits to be a low cost and stable source of funding for the loans Fifth Third makes and the operations of Fifth Third’s business. Core deposits, which include transaction deposits and other time deposits, have historically provided Fifth Third with a sizeable source of relatively stable andlow-cost funds (average core deposits funded 70% of average total assets at December 31, 2016). In addition to customer deposits, sources of liquidity include investments in the securities portfolio, Fifth Third’s sale or securitization of loans in secondary markets and the pledging of loans and investment securities to access secured borrowing facilities through the FHLB and the FRB, and Fifth Third’s ability to raise funds in domestic and international money and capital markets.

Fifth Third’s liquidity and ability to fund and run the business could be materially adversely affected by a variety of conditions and factors, including financial and credit market disruptions and volatility or a lack of market or customer confidence in financial markets in general similar to what occurred during the financial crisis in 2008 and early 2009, which may result in a loss of customer deposits or outflows of cash or collateral and/or ability to access capital markets on favorable terms.

Other conditions and factors that could materially adversely affect Fifth Third’s liquidity and funding include:

a lack of market or customer confidence in Fifth Third or negative news about Fifth Third or the financial services industry generally, which also may result in a loss of deposits and/or negatively affect the ability to October 2013. Prioraccess the capital markets;

the loss of customer deposits to that, Mr. Tuzun was the Assistant Treasurer alternative investments;

inability to sell or securitize loans or other assets,

increased regulatory requirements,

and Balance Sheet Managerreductions in one or more of Fifth Third Bancorp. Previously, Mr. Tuzun was the Structured Finance Manager since 2007.Third’s credit ratings.

180  Fifth Third Bancorp


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Bancorp’s common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and is listed under the symbol “FITB” on the NASDAQ® Global Select Market System.

High and Low Stock Prices and Dividends Paid Per Share 
2014  High   Low   Dividends Paid
Per Share
 

Fourth Quarter

   $20.82     $17.65     $0.13  

Third Quarter

   $21.79     $19.45     $0.13  

Second Quarter

   $23.41     $19.82     $0.13  

First Quarter

   $23.90     $20.37     $0.12  
2013  High   Low   

Dividends Paid

Per Share

 

Fourth Quarter

   $21.14     $17.49     $0.12  

Third Quarter

   $19.79     $17.80     $0.12  

Second Quarter

   $18.74     $15.62     $0.12  

First Quarter

   $16.77     $15.19     $0.11  

See a discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the Bancorp discussed in Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, as of December 31, 2014, the Bancorp had 46,876 shareholders of record.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 
Period  Shares
Purchased(a)
   Average Price
Paid Per
Share
   Shares
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
   Maximum
Shares that
May Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs
 

October 2014

   10,234,560    $18.15    10,234,560    73,180,368  

November 2014

               73,180,368  

December 2014

               73,180,368  

Total

   10,234,560    $18.15    10,234,560    73,180,368  
(a)The Bancorp repurchased 117,961, 34,182 and 46,119 shares during October, November and December of 2014 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the Bancorp. These purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the Board of Directors authorization.

See further discussion of stock-based compensation in Note 24 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

181  Fifth Third Bancorp


The following performance graphs do not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Bancorp specifically incorporates the performance graphs by reference therein.

Total Return Analysis

The graphs below summarize the cumulative return experienced by the Bancorp’s shareholders over the years 2009 through 2014, and 2004 through 2014, respectively, compared to the S&P 500 Stock and the S&P Banks indices.

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP VS. MARKET INDICES

LOGO

182  Fifth Third Bancorp


PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item relating to the Executive Officers of the Registrant is included in PART I under “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE BANCORP.”

The information required by this item concerning Directors and the nomination process is incorporated herein by reference under the caption “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by this item concerning the Audit Committee and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE” and “BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ITS COMMITTEES, MEETINGS AND FUNCTIONS” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by this item concerning Section 16 (a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance is incorporated herein by reference under the caption “SECTION 16 (a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS,” “COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS,” “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT” and “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security ownership information of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS,” “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS” and “COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by this item concerning Equity Compensation Plan information is included in Note 24 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS”, “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”, “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE” and “BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ITS COMMITTEES, MEETINGS AND FUNCTIONS” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference under the caption “PRINCIPAL INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL AUDIT FIRM FEES” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

192  Fifth Third Bancorp


A reduced credit rating could adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to borrow funds and raise the cost of borrowings substantially and could cause creditors and business counterparties to raise collateral requirements or take other actions that could adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to raise capital. Many of the above conditions and factors may be caused by events over which Fifth Third has little or no control such as what occurred during the financial crisis. While market conditions have stabilized and, in many cases, improved, there can be no assurance that significant disruption and volatility in the financial markets will not occur in the future.

Recent regulatory changes relating to liquidity and risk management may also negatively impact Fifth Third’s results of operations and competitive position. Various regulations recently adopted or proposed, and additional regulations under consideration, impose or could impose more stringent liquidity requirements for large financial institutions, including Fifth Third. These regulations address, among other matters, liquidity stress testing, minimum liquidity requirements and restrictions on short-term debt issued bytop-tier holding companies. Given the overlap and complex interactions of these regulations with other regulatory changes, including the resolution and recovery framework applicable to Fifth Third, the full impact of the adopted and proposed regulations will remain uncertain until their full implementation. It is also uncertain whether adopted and proposed regulations will ultimately be rolled back or modified as a result of the change in administration in the U.S. Uncertainty about the timing and scope of any such changes as well as the cost of complying with a new regulatory regime may negatively impact Fifth Third’s business.

If Fifth Third is unable to continue to fund assets through customer bank deposits or access capital markets on favorable terms or if Fifth Third suffers an increase in borrowing costs or otherwise fails to manage liquidity effectively, then Fifth Third’s liquidity, operating margins, and financial results and condition may be materially adversely affected. As Fifth Third did during the financial crisis, it may also need to raise additional capital through the issuance of stock, which could dilute the ownership of existing stockholders, or reduce or even eliminate common stock dividends to preserve capital.

Fifth Third may have more credit risk and higher credit losses to the extent loans are concentrated by location or industry of the borrowers or collateral.

Fifth Third’s credit risk and credit losses can increase if its loans are concentrated to borrowers engaged in the same or similar activities or to borrowers who as a group may be uniquely or disproportionately affected by economic or market conditions. Deterioration in economic conditions, housing conditions and commodity and real estate values in certain states or locations could result in materially higher credit losses if loans are concentrated in those locations. Fifth Third has significant exposures to businesses in certain economic sectors such as manufacturing, real estate, financial services and insurance and weaknesses in those businesses may adversely impact Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally Fifth Third has a substantial portfolio of commercial and residential real estate loans and weaknesses in residential or commercial real estate markets may adversely impact Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or financial condition.

Fifth Third may be required to repurchase residential mortgage loans or reimburse investors and others as a result of breaches in contractual representations and warranties.

Fifth Third sells residential mortgage loans to various parties, including GSEs and other financial institutions that purchase residential mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. Fifth Third may be required to repurchase residential mortgage loans, indemnify the securitization trust, investor or insurer, or reimburse the securitization trust, investor or insurer for credit losses incurred on loans in the event of a breach of contractual representations or warranties that is not remedied within a specified period (usually 60 days or less) after Fifth Third receives notice of the breach. Contracts for residential mortgage loan sales to the GSEs include various types of specific remedies and penalties that could be applied to inadequate responses to repurchase requests. If economic conditions and the housing market deteriorate or future investor repurchase demand and Fifth Third’s success at appealing repurchase requests differ from past experience, Fifth Third could have increased repurchase obligations and increased loss severity on repurchases, requiring material additions to the repurchase reserve.

If Fifth Third does not respond to rapid changes in the financial services industry or otherwise adapt to changing customer preferences, its financial performance may suffer.

Fifth Third’s ability to deliver strong financial performance and returns on investment to shareholders will depend in part on its ability to expand the scope of available financial services to meet the needs and demands of its customers. In addition to the challenge of competing against other banks in attracting and retaining customers for traditional banking services, Fifth Third’s competitors also include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, and specialty finance, telecommunications, technology and insurance companies who seek to offerone-stop financial services that may include services that banks have not been able or allowed to offer to their customers in the past or may not be currently able or allowed to offer.

This increasingly competitive environment is primarily a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems, as well as the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. Rapidly changing technology and consumer preferences may require Fifth Third to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services in order to compete and meet customer demands. Fifth Third may not be able to do so or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. As a result, Fifth Third’s ability to effectively compete to retain or acquire new business may be impaired, and its business, financial condition or results of operations, may be adversely affected.

Fifth Third may make strategic investments and may expand an existing line of business or enter into new lines of business to remain competitive. If Fifth Third’s chosen strategies, for example, the NorthStar Strategy initiatives, are not appropriate to effectively compete or Fifth Third does not execute them in an appropriate or timely manner, Fifth Third’s business and results may suffer. Additionally, these strategies, products and lines of business may bring with them unforeseeable or unforeseen risks and may not generate the expected results or returns, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s results of operations or future growth prospects and cause Fifth Third to fail to meet its stated goals and expectations.

193  Fifth Third Bancorp


Fifth Third may not be able to successfully implement future information technology system enhancements, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s business operations and profitability.

Fifth Third invests significant resources in information technology system enhancements in order to provide functionality and security at an appropriate level. Fifth Third may not be able to successfully implement and integrate future system enhancements, which could adversely impact the ability to provide timely and accurate financial information in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which could result in sanctions from regulatory authorities. Such sanctions could include fines and result in reputational harm and have other negative effects. In addition, future system enhancements could have higher than expected costs and/or result in operating inefficiencies, which could increase the costs associated with the implementation as well as ongoing operations. Failure to properly utilize system enhancements that are implemented in the future could result in impairment charges that adversely impact Fifth Third’s financial condition and results of operations and could result in significant costs to remediate or replace the defective components. In addition, Fifth Third may incur significant training, licensing, maintenance, consulting and amortization expenses during and after systems implementations, and any such costs may continue for an extended period of time.

If Fifth Third is unable to grow its deposits, it may be subject to paying higher funding costs.

The total amount that Fifth Third pays for funding costs is dependent, in part, on Fifth Third’s ability to grow its deposits. If Fifth Third is unable to sufficiently grow its deposits to meet liquidity objectives, it may be subject to paying higher funding costs. Fifth Third competes with banks and other financial services companies for deposits. If competitors raise the rates they pay on deposits, Fifth Third’s funding costs may increase, either because Fifth Third raises rates to avoid losing deposits or because Fifth Third loses deposits and must rely on more expensive sources of funding. Higher funding costs reduce Fifth Third’s net interest margin and net interest income. Fifth Third’s bank customers could take their money out of the Bank and put it in alternative investments, causing Fifth Third to lose a lower cost source of funding. Checking and savings account balances and other forms of customer deposits may decrease when customers perceive alternative investments, such as the stock market, as providing a better risk/return tradeoff.

The Bancorp’s ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries accounts for most of its revenue and could affect its liquidity and ability to pay dividends.

Fifth Third Bancorp is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. Fifth Third Bancorp typically receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on Fifth Third Bancorp’s stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations, as well as regulatory expectations, limit the amount of dividends that the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary and certain nonbank subsidiaries may pay. Regulatory scrutiny of capital levels at bank holding companies and insured depository institution subsidiaries has increased since the financial crisis and has resulted in increased regulatory focus on all aspects of capital planning, including dividends and other distributions to shareholders of banks such as the parent bank

holding companies. Also, Fifth Third Bancorp’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of that subsidiary’s creditors. Limitations on the Bancorp’s ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity and ability to pay dividends on stock or interest and principal on its debt. For further information refer to Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The financial services industry is highly competitive and creates competitive pressures that could adversely affect Fifth Third’s revenue and profitability.

The financial services industry in which Fifth Third operates is highly competitive. Fifth Third competes not only with commercial banks, but also with insurance companies, mutual funds, hedge funds, telecommunications and technology and other companies offering financial services in the U.S., globally and over the internet. Fifth Third competes on the basis of several factors, including capital, access to capital, revenue generation, products, services, transaction execution, innovation, reputation and price. Over time, certain sectors of the financial services industry have become more concentrated, as institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms. These developments could result in Fifth Third’s competitors gaining greater capital and other resources, such as a broader range of products and services and geographic diversity. Fifth Third may experience pricing pressures as a result of these factors and as some of its competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.

Fifth Third and/or the holders of its securities could be adversely affected by unfavorable ratings from rating agencies.

Fifth Third’s ability to access the capital markets is important to its overall funding profile. This access is affected by the ratings assigned by rating agencies to Fifth Third, certain of its subsidiaries and particular classes of securities they issue. The interest rates that Fifth Third pays on its securities are also influenced by, among other things, the credit ratings that it, its subsidiaries and/or its securities receive from recognized rating agencies. A downgrade to Fifth Third or its subsidiaries’ credit rating could affect its ability to access the capital markets, increase its borrowing costs and negatively impact its profitability. A ratings downgrade to Fifth Third, its subsidiaries or their securities could also create obligations or liabilities of Fifth Third under the terms of its outstanding securities that could increase Fifth Third’s costs or otherwise have a negative effect on its results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, a downgrade of the credit rating of any particular security issued by Fifth Third or its subsidiaries could negatively affect the ability of the holders of that security to sell the securities and the prices at which any such securities may be sold.

Fifth Third could suffer if it fails to attract and retain skilled personnel.

Fifth Third’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key individuals. Competition for qualified candidates in the activities and markets that Fifth Third serves is intense, which may increase Fifth Third’s expenses and may result in Fifth Third not being able to hire candidates or retain them. If Fifth Third is not able to hire qualified candidates or retain its key personnel, Fifth Third may be unable to execute its business strategies and may suffer adverse consequences to its business, operations and financial condition.

194  Fifth Third Bancorp


Compensation paid by financial institutions such as Fifth Third has become increasingly regulated, particularly under the DFA, which regulation affects the amount and form of compensation Fifth Third pays to hire and retain talented employees. If Fifth Third is unable to attract and retain qualified employees, or do so at rates necessary to maintain its competitive position, or if compensation costs required to attract and retain employees become more expensive, Fifth Third’s performance, including its competitive position, could be materially adversely affected.

Fifth Third’s mortgage banking revenue can be volatile from quarter to quarter.

Fifth Third earns revenue from the fees it receives for originating mortgage loans and for servicing mortgage loans. When rates rise, the demand for mortgage loans tends to fall, reducing the revenue Fifth Third receives from loan originations. At the same time, revenue from MSRs can increase through increases in fair value. When rates fall, mortgage originations tend to increase and the value of MSRs tends to decline, also with some offsetting revenue effect. Even though the origination of mortgage loans can act as a “natural hedge,” the hedge is not perfect, either in amount or timing. For example, the negative effect on revenue from a decrease in the fair value of residential MSRs is immediate, but any offsetting revenue benefit from more originations and the MSRs relating to the new loans would accrue over time. It is also possible that even if interest rates were to fall, mortgage originations may also fall or any increase in mortgage originations may not be enough to offset the decrease in the MSRs value caused by the lower rates.

Fifth Third typically uses derivatives and other instruments to hedge its mortgage banking interest rate risk. Fifth Third generally does not hedge all of its risks, and the fact that Fifth Third attempts to hedge any of the risks does not mean Fifth Third will be successful. Hedging is a complex process, requiring sophisticated models and constant monitoring. Fifth Third may use hedging instruments tied to U.S. Treasury rates, LIBOR or Eurodollars that may not perfectly correlate with the value or income being hedged. Fifth Third could incur significant losses from its hedging activities. There may be periods where Fifth Third elects not to use derivatives and other instruments to hedge mortgage banking interest rate risk.

Fifth Third uses models for business planning purposes that may not adequately predict future results.

Fifth Third uses financial models to aid in its planning for various purposes including its capital and liquidity needs and other purposes. The models used may not accurately account for all variables and may fail to predict outcomes accurately and/or may overstate or understate certain effects. As a result of these potential failures, Fifth Third may not adequately prepare for future events and may suffer losses or other setbacks due to these failures.

Also, information Fifth Third provides to the public or to its regulators based on models could be inaccurate or misleading due to inadequate design or implementation, for example. Decisions that its regulators make, including those related to capital distributions to its shareholders, could be affected adversely due to the perception that the models used to generate the relevant information are unreliable or inadequate.

Changes in interest rates could also reduce the value of MSRs.

Fifth Third acquires MSRs when it keeps the servicing rights after the sale or securitization of the loans that have been originated or when it purchases the servicing rights to mortgage loans originated by other lenders. Fifth Third initially measures all residential MSRs at fair value and subsequently amortizes the MSRs in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. Fair value is the present value of estimated future net servicing income, calculated based on a number of variables, including assumptions about the likelihood of prepayment by borrowers. Servicing rights are assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance and other-than-temporary impairment recognized through awrite-off of the servicing asset and related valuation allowance.

Changes in interest rates can affect prepayment assumptions and thus fair value. When interest rates fall, borrowers are usually more likely to prepay their mortgage loans by refinancing them at a lower rate. As the likelihood of prepayment increases, the fair value of MSRs can decrease. Each quarter Fifth Third evaluates the fair value of MSRs, and decreases in fair value of MSRs below amortized cost reduce earnings in the period in which the decrease occurs.

The preparation of financial statements requires Fifth Third to make subjective determinations and use estimates that may vary from actual results and materially impact its results of operations or financial position.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. If new information arises that results in a material change to a reserve amount, such a change could result in a change to previously announced financial results. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies section of MD&A for more information regarding management’s significant estimates.

Changes in accounting standards or interpretations could impact Fifth Third’s reported earnings and financial condition.

The accounting standard setters, including the FASB, the SEC and other regulatory agencies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of Fifth Third’s consolidated financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how Fifth Third records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, Fifth Third could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, which would result in the recasting of Fifth Third’s prior period financial statements.

Future acquisitions may dilute current shareholders’ ownership of Fifth Third and may cause Fifth Third to become more susceptible to adverse economic events.

Future business acquisitions could be material to Fifth Third and it may issue additional shares of stock to pay for those acquisitions, which would dilute current shareholders’ ownership interests. Acquisitions also could require Fifth Third to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur debt. In those events, Fifth Third could become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.

195  Fifth Third Bancorp


Difficulties in identifying suitable opportunities or combining the operations of acquired entities or assets with Fifth Third’s own operations or assessing the effectiveness of businesses in which we make strategic investments or with which we enter into strategic contractual relationships may prevent Fifth Third from achieving the expected benefits from these acquisitions, investments or relationships.

Inherent uncertainties exist when assessing or integrating the operations of an acquired business or investment or relationship opportunity. Fifth Third may not be able to fully achieve its strategic objectives and planned operating efficiencies in an acquisition or strategic relationship. In addition, the markets and industries in which Fifth Third and its potential acquisition and investment targets operate are highly competitive. Acquisition or investment targets may lose customers or otherwise perform poorly or unprofitably, in the case of an acquired business or strategic relationship, cause Fifth Third to lose customers or perform poorly or unprofitably. Future acquisition and integration activities and efforts to monitor new investments or reap the benefits of a new strategic relationship may require Fifth Third to devote substantial time and resources and may cause these acquisitions, investments and relationships to be unprofitable or cause Fifth Third to be unable to pursue other business opportunities.

After completing an acquisition, Fifth Third may find certain items were not accounted for properly in accordance with financial accounting and reporting standards. Fifth Third may also not realize the expected benefits of the acquisition due to lower financial results pertaining to the acquired entity or assets. For example, Fifth Third could experience higher charge-offs than originally anticipated related to the acquired loan portfolio. Additionally, acquired companies or businesses may increase Fifth Third’s risk of regulatory action or restrictions related to the operations of the acquired business.

Fifth Third may sell or consider selling one or more of its businesses. Should it determine to sell such a business, it may not be able to generate gains on sale or related increase in shareholders’ equity commensurate with desirable levels. Moreover, if Fifth Third sold such businesses, the loss of income could have an adverse effect on its earnings and future growth.

Fifth Third owns, or owns a minority stake in, as applicable, severalnon-strategic businesses and other assets that are not significantly synergistic with its core financial services businesses or may no longer be aligned with Fifth Third’s strategic plans. Fifth Third has, from time to time, considered and undertaken (and, in the case of Vantiv, has announced its intention to continue) the sale of such businesses and/or interests, including, for example, portions of Fifth Third’s stake in Vantiv Holding, LLC. If it were to determine to sell such businesses and/or interests, Fifth Third would be subject to market forces that may make completion of a sale unsuccessful or may not be able to do so within a desirable time frame. If Fifth Third were to complete the sale of any of its businesses and/or interests in third parties, it would lose the income from the sold businesses and/or interests, including those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and such loss of income could have an adverse effect on its future earnings and growth. Additionally, Fifth Third may encounter difficulties in separating the operations of any businesses it sells, which may affect its business or results of operations.

Fifth Third relies on its systems and certain third party service providers, and certain failures could materially adversely affect operations.

Fifth Third collects, processes and stores sensitive consumer data by utilizing computer systems and telecommunications networks operated by both Fifth Third and third party service providers. Fifth Third has security, backup and recovery systems in place, as well as a business continuity plan to ensure the systems will not be inoperable. Fifth Third also has security to prevent unauthorized access to the systems. In addition, Fifth Third requires its third party service providers to maintain similar controls. However, Fifth Third cannot be certain that the measures will be successful. A security breach in the systems and loss of confidential information such as credit card numbers and related information could result in significant reputational harm and the loss of customers’ confidence in Fifth Third. As a result, we may lose existing and new customers and incur significant costs, including privacy monitoring activities.

Fifth Third’s necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transaction volume poses the risk that technical system flaws or employee errors, tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses and may be difficult to detect. Fifth Third may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages).

Third parties with which the Bancorp does business, as well as retailers and other third parties with which the Bancorp’s customers do business, can also be sources of operational risk to the Bancorp, particularly where activities of customers are beyond the Bancorp’s security and control systems, such as through the use of the internet, personal computers, tablets, smart phones and other mobile services. Security breaches affecting the Bancorp’s customers, or systems breakdowns or failures, security breaches or employee misconduct affecting such other third parties, may require the Bancorp to take steps to protect the integrity of its own operational systems or to safeguard confidential information of the Bancorp or its customers, thereby increasing the Bancorp’s operational costs and potentially diminishing customer satisfaction. If personal, confidential or proprietary information of customers or clients in the Bancorp’s possession were to be mishandled or misused, the Bancorp could suffer significant regulatory consequences, reputational damage and financial loss. Such mishandling or misuse could include circumstances where, for example, such information was erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, either through the fault of the Bancorp’s systems, employees or counterparties, or where such information was intercepted or otherwise compromised by third parties. The Bancorp may be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond the Bancorp’s control, which may include, for example, security breaches; electrical or telecommunications outages; failures of computer servers or other damage to the Bancorp’s property or assets; natural disasters or severe weather conditions; health emergencies; or events arising from local or larger-scale political events, including outbreaks of hostilities or terrorist acts. While the Bancorp believes that its current resiliency plans are both sufficient and adequate, there can be no assurance that such plans will fully mitigate all potential business continuity risks to the Bancorp or its customers and clients.

196  Fifth Third Bancorp


Any failures or disruptions of the Bancorp’s systems or operations could give rise to losses in service to customers and clients, adversely affect the Bancorp’s business and results of operations by subjecting the Bancorp to losses or liability, or require the Bancorp to expend significant resources to correct the failure or disruption, as well as by exposing the Bancorp to reputational harm, litigation, regulatory fines or penalties or losses not covered by insurance.

Fifth Third is exposed to cyber-security risks, including denial of service, hacking, and identity theft, which could result in the disclosure, theft or destruction of confidential information.

Fifth Third relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in disruptions to its accounting, deposit, loan and other systems, and adversely affect its customer relationships. While Fifth Third has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of these possible events, there can be no assurance that any such failure, interruption or security breach will not occur or, if any does occur, that it can be sufficiently remediated. There have been increasing efforts on the part of third parties, including through cyber-attacks, to breach data security at financial institutions or with respect to financial transactions. There have been several recent instances involving financial services and consumer-based companies reporting the unauthorized disclosure of client or customer information or the destruction or theft of corporate data, by both private individuals and foreign governments. In addition, because the techniques used to cause such security breaches change frequently, often are not recognized until launched against a target and may originate from less regulated and remote areas around the world, Fifth Third may be unable to proactively address these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Furthermore, there has been a well-publicized series of apparently related distributed denial of service attacks on large financial services companies, including Fifth Third Bank, and “ransom” attacks where hackers have requested payments in exchange for not disclosing customer information. Distributed denial of service attacks are designed to saturate the targeted online network with excessive amounts of network traffic, resulting in slow response times, or in some cases, causing the site to be temporarily unavailable. These events adversely affected the performance of Fifth Third’s website and in some instances prevented customers from accessing Fifth Third’s website. Future cyber-attacks could be more disruptive and damaging. Cyber threats are rapidly evolving and Fifth Third may not be able to anticipate or prevent all such attacks. Fifth Third may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize these risks or in the investigation of such cyber-attacks or related to the protection of the Bancorp’s customers from identity theft as a result of such attacks. Despite this effort, the occurrence of any failure, interruption or security breach of Fifth Third’s systems or third-party service providers, particularly if widespread or resulting in financial losses to customers, could also seriously damage Fifth Third’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject it to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose it to civil litigation and financial liability.

Fifth Third is exposed to operational and reputational risk.

Fifth Third is exposed to many types of operational risk, including but not limited to, business continuity risk, information management risk, fraud risk, model risk, third party service provider risk, human resources risk, and process risk.

Fifth Third’s actual or alleged conduct in activities, such as lending practices, data security, corporate governance and acquisitions, may result in negative public opinion and may damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Actions taken by government regulators and community

organizations may also damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Additionally, whereas negative public opinion once was primarily driven by adverse news coverage in traditional media, the advent and expansion of social media facilitates the rapid dissemination of information. Though Fifth Third monitors social media channels, the potential remains for rapid and widespread dissemination of inaccurate, misleading or false information that could damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Negative public opinion can adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to attract and keep customers and can increase the risk that it will be a target of litigation and regulatory action.

Fifth Third’s framework for managing risks may not be effective in mitigating its risk and loss.

Fifth Third’s risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and loss. Fifth Third has established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, and analyze the types of risk to which it is subject, including liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, compliance risk, strategic risk, reputational risk, and operational risk related to its employees, systems and vendors, among others. Any system of control and any system to reduce risk exposure, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. A failure in Fifth Third’s internal controls could have a significant negative impact not only on its earnings, but also on the perception that customers, regulators and investors may have of Fifth Third. Fifth Third continues to devote a significant amount of effort, time and resources to improving its controls and ensuring compliance with complex regulations.

Additionally, instruments, systems and strategies used to hedge or otherwise manage exposure to various types of market compliance, credit, liquidity, operational and business risks and enterprise-wide risk could be less effective than anticipated. As a result, Fifth Third may not be able to effectively mitigate its risk exposures in particular market environments or against particular types of risk. If Fifth Third’s risk management framework proves ineffective, Fifth Third could incur litigation, negative regulatory consequences, reputational damages among other adverse consequences and Fifth Third could suffer unexpected losses that may affect its financial condition or results of operations.

The results of Vantiv Holding, LLC could have a negative impact on Fifth Third’s operating results and financial condition.

In 2009, Fifth Third sold an approximate 51% interest in its processing business, Vantiv Holding, LLC (formerly Fifth Third Processing Solutions). As a result of additional share sales completed by Fifth Third in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the Bancorp ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC as of December 31, 2016, is approximately 18%. The Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC is currently accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is not consolidated based on Fifth Third’s remaining ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC. Vantiv Holding, LLC’s operating results could be poor and could negatively affect the operating results of Fifth Third. In addition, Fifth Third participates in a multi-lender credit facility to Vantiv Holding, LLC and repayment of these loans is contingent on the future cash flows of Vantiv Holding, LLC, which are subject to their own risks and uncertainties.

197  Fifth Third Bancorp


Changes in Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv Holding, LLC could have an impact on Fifth Third’s stock price, operating results, financial condition, and future outlook.

Fifth Third expects that it will reduce its equity investments in Vantiv Holding, LLC and its publicly traded parent, Vantiv, Inc., in whole or in part, but there can be no assurance that such sales will occur or as to when they will occur or the value that might be received by Fifth Third. A reduction in Fifth Third’s Vantiv ownership interest may result from a series of sale transactions similar to transactions in Vantiv securities engaged in by Fifth Third to date, or could occur as a result of one or more larger transactions, depending on strategic considerations, market conditions, or other factors deemed important by Fifth Third. Additionally, Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv could be affected by transactions that Vantiv may undertake. The nature, terms, and timing of transactions engaged in by Vantiv may not be entirely within Fifth Third’s control, if at all. If and when Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv is reduced, such changes in ownership could have a material impact, positive or negative, on Fifth Third’s stock price, operating results, financial condition and future outlook.

Weather related events or other natural disasters may have an effect on the performance of Fifth Third’s loan portfolios, especially in its coastal markets, thereby adversely impacting its results of operations.

Fifth Third’s footprint stretches from the upper Midwestern to lower Southeastern regions of the United States. These regions have experienced weather events including hurricanes and other natural disasters. The nature and level of these events and the impact of global climate change upon their frequency and severity cannot be predicted. If large scale events occur, they may significantly impact its loan portfolios by damaging properties pledged as collateral as well as impairing its borrowers’ ability to repay their loans.

RISKS RELATED TO THE LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

As a regulated entity, the Bancorp is subject to certain capital requirements that may limit its operations and potential growth.

The Bancorp is a bank holding company and a financial holding company. As such, it is subject to the comprehensive, consolidated supervision and regulation of the FRB, including risk-based and leverage capital requirements, investment practices, dividend policy and growth. The Bancorp must maintain certain risk-based and leverage capital ratios as required by the FRB which can change depending upon general economic conditions and the Bancorp’s particular condition, risk profile and growth plans. Compliance with the capital requirements, including leverage ratios, may limit operations that require the intensive use of capital and could adversely affect the Bancorp’s ability to expand or maintain present business levels.

U.S. federal banking agencies’ capital rules implementing Basel III became effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject tophase-in periods for certain components and other provisions. The need to maintain more and higher quality capital as well as greater liquidity could limit Fifth Third’s business activities, including lending, and the ability to expand, either organically or through acquisitions. Moreover, although the capital requirements are being phased in over time, U.S. federal banking agencies take into account expectations regarding the ability of banks to meet the capital requirements, including under stressed conditions, in approving actions that represent uses of capital, such as dividend increases and share repurchases.

Failure by the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary to meet applicable capital requirements could subject the Bank to a variety of enforcement remedies available to the federal regulatory authorities. These include limitations on the ability to pay dividends, the issuance by the regulatory authority of a capital directive to increase capital, and the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC.

Fifth Third’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by new or changed regulations and by the manner in which such regulations are applied by regulatory authorities.

Previous economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial services industry. The U.S. government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by introducing various actions and passing legislation such as the DFA. Such programs and legislation subject Fifth Third and other financial institutions to restrictions, oversight and/or costs that may have an impact on Fifth Third’s business, financial condition, results of operations or the price of its common stock.

Although there is uncertainty regarding whether the programs implemented and the legislation passed following the financial crisis will remain in place or be modified or repealed under the new administration in the U.S., any new proposals for legislation and regulations introduced could further substantially increase compliance costs in the financial services industry. In addition, changes to laws and regulations could have a negatively impact in the short term even if the longer-term impact of those changes may be expected to be positive for Fifth Third. Fifth Third cannot predict whether any pending or future legislation will be adopted or the substance and impact of any such new legislation on Fifth Third. Changes in regulation could affect Fifth Third in a substantial way and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fifth Third is subject to various regulatory requirements that may limit its operations and potential growth.

Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions and their holding companies, the FRB, the FDIC, the CFPB and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions have the authority to compel or restrict certain actions by Fifth Third and its banking subsidiary, Fifth Third Bank. Fifth Third and its banking subsidiary are subject to such supervisory authority and, more generally, must, in certain instances, obtain prior regulatory approval before engaging in certain activities or corporate decisions. There can be no assurance that such approvals, if required, would be forthcoming or that such approvals would be granted in a timely manner. Failure to receive any such approval, if required, could limit or impair Fifth Third’s operations, restrict its growth and/or affect its dividend policy. Such actions and activities subject to prior approval include, but are not limited to, increasing dividends paid by Fifth Third or its banking subsidiary, entering into a merger or acquisition transaction, acquiring or establishing new branches, and entering into certain new businesses.

198  Fifth Third Bancorp


The Bancorp is a bank holding company and a financial holding company. Failure by the Bancorp or Fifth Third Bank to meet the applicable eligibility requirements for financial holding company status (including capital and management requirements and that Fifth Third Bank maintain at least a “Satisfactory” CRA rating) may result in restrictions on certain activities of the Bancorp, including the commencement of new activities and mergers with or acquisitions of other financial institutions, and could ultimately result in the loss of financial holding company status.

In the wake of the most recent global financial crisis, Fifth Third and other financial institutions more generally have been subjected to increased scrutiny from government authorities, including bank regulatory authorities, stemming from broader systemic regulatory concerns, including with respect to stress testing, capital levels, asset quality, provisioning, AML/BSA, consumer compliance and other prudential matters and efforts to ensure that financial institutions take steps to improve their risk management and prevent future crises.

In this regard, government authorities, including the bank regulatory agencies, are also pursuing aggressive enforcement actions with respect to compliance and other legal matters involving financial activities, which heightens the risks associated with actual and perceived compliance failures and may also adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to enter into certain transactions or engage in certain activities, or obtain necessary regulatory approvals in connection therewith.

In some cases, regulatory agencies may take supervisory actions that may not be publicly disclosed, which restrict or limit a financial institution. Finally, as part of Fifth Third’s regular examination process, Fifth Third’s and its banking subsidiary’s respective regulators may advise it and its banking subsidiary to operate under various restrictions as a prudential matter. Such supervisory actions or restrictions, if and in whatever manner imposed, could negatively affect Fifth Third’s ability to engage in new activities and certain transactions, as well as have a material adverse effect on Fifth Third’s business and results of operations and may not be publicly disclosed.

In July 2016, the FRB announced that Fifth Third Bank received a rating of “Needs to Improve” on its CRA examination for the period covering 2011-2013 following its periodic examination to determine Fifth Third Bank’s compliance with the CRA from 2011 through 2013. While Fifth Third Bank’s CRA rating is “Needs to Improve” the Bancorp and Fifth Third Bank face limitations and conditions on certain activities (including the commencement of new activities and merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions) and the potential loss of financial holding company status. As a result of these limitations and conditions, Fifth Third may be unable or may fail to pursue, evaluate or complete transactions that might have been strategically or competitively significant. The Bank’s next CRA examination commenced during the fourth quarter of 2016.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, investigations and proceedings by various governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, as well as self-regulatory agencies which may lead to adverse consequences.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, as well as self-regulatory agencies, regarding their respective customers and businesses. In addition, the complexity of the federal and state

regulatory and enforcement regimes in the U.S. means that a single event or topic may give rise to numerous and overlapping investigations and regulatory proceedings. Such matters may result in material adverse consequences, including without limitation, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other actions, amendments and/or restatements of Fifth Third’s SEC filings and/or financial statements, as applicable, and/or determinations of material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures.

There has been a trend of large settlements with governmental agencies that may adversely affect the outcomes for other financial institutions, to the extent they are used as a template for other settlements in the future. The uncertain regulatory enforcement environment makes it difficult to estimate probable losses, which can lead to substantial disparities between legal reserves and actual settlements or penalties.

Deposit insurance premiums levied against Fifth Third Bank may increase if the number of bank failures increase or the cost of resolving failed banks increases.

The FDIC maintains a DIF to protect insured depositors in the event of bank failures. The DIF is funded by fees assessed on insured depository institutions including Fifth Third Bank. Future deposit premiums paid by Fifth Third Bank depend on FDIC rules, which are subject to change, the level of the DIF and the magnitude and cost of future bank failures. Fifth Third Bank may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums if market developments change such that the DIF balance is reduced or the FDIC changes its rules to require higher premiums.

Fifth Third is subject to extensive governmental regulation which could adversely impact Fifth Third or the businesses in which Fifth Third is engaged.

Fifth Third is subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost all aspects of its operations and limit the businesses in which Fifth Third may engage. These laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers and depositors and are not designed to protect security-holders. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact Fifth Third or its ability to increase the value of its business. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against Fifth Third could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defending itself and may lead to penalties that materially affect Fifth Third and its shareholders. Future changes in the laws, including tax laws, or regulations or their interpretations or enforcement may also be materially adverse to Fifth Third and its shareholders or may require Fifth Third to expend significant time and resources to comply with such requirements.

The DFA, enacted in 2010, is complex and broad in scope and several of its provisions are still being implemented. The DFA established the CFPB which has authority to regulate consumer financial products and services sold by banks andnon-bank companies and to supervise banks with assets of more than $10 billion and their affiliates for compliance with Federal consumer protection laws. Since its formation, the CFPB has finalized a number of significant rules that could have a significant impact on Fifth Third’s business and the financial services industry more generally including integrated mortgage disclosures under the Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

199  Fifth Third Bancorp


Compliance with the rules and policies adopted by the CFPB may limit the products Fifth Third may permissibly offer to customers, or limit the terms on which those products may be issued, or may adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to conduct its business as previously conducted. Fifth Third may also be required to add additional compliance personnel or incur other significant compliance-related expenses. Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or competitive position may be adversely affected as a result.

The reforms, both under the DFA and otherwise, are having a significant effect on the entire financial industry. Fifth Third believes compliance with the DFA and implementing its regulations and other initiatives will likely continue to negatively impact revenue and increase the cost of doing business, both in terms of transition expenses and on an ongoing basis, and may also limit Fifth Third’s ability to pursue certain desirable business opportunities. Any new regulatory requirements or changes to existing requirements could require changes to Fifth Third’s businesses, result in increased compliance costs and affect the profitability of such businesses. Additionally, reform could affect the behaviors of third parties that Fifth Third deals with in the course of business, such as rating agencies, insurance companies and investors. The extent to which Fifth Third can adjust its strategies to offset such adverse impacts also is not known at this time.

We may become subject to more stringent regulatory requirements and activity restrictions if the FRB and FDIC determine that Fifth Third’s resolution plan is not credible.

The DFA and implementing regulations jointly issued by the FRB and FDIC require bank holding companies with more than $50 billion in assets to annually submit a resolution plan to the FRB and the FDIC that, in the event of material financial distress or failure, establish the rapid, orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. If the FRB and the FDIC jointly determine that Fifth Third’s resolution plan is not “credible,” Fifth Third could become subjected to more stringent capital, leverage or liquidity requirements or restrictions, or restrictions on Fifth Third’s growth, activities or operations, and could eventually be required to divest certain assets or operations in ways that could negatively impact its operations and strategy.

Conforming Covered Activities to the Volcker Rule may require the expenditure of resources and management attention and result in forced sales of assets.

Among other restricted activities, the DFA “Volcker Rule” generally restricts banks and their affiliates from sponsoring or retaining an interest in certain private equity and hedge funds. A forced sale of some or all (“Legacy Covered Funds”) could result in Fifth Third receiving less value than it would otherwise have received.

If an orderly liquidation of a systemically important bank holding company ornon-bank financial company were triggered, Fifth Third could face assessments for the Orderly Liquidation Fund.

The DFA created authority for the orderly liquidation of systemically important bank holding companies andnon-bank financial companies and is based on the FDIC’s bank resolution model. The Secretary of the U.S. Treasury may trigger liquidation under this authority only after consultation with the President of the United States and after receiving a recommendation from the

boards of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve upon atwo-thirds vote. Liquidation proceedings will be funded by the Orderly Liquidation Fund established under the DFA, which will borrow from the U.S. Treasury and impose risk-based assessments on covered financial companies. Risk-based assessments would be made, first, on entities that received more in the resolution than they would have received in the liquidation to the extent of such excess, and second, if necessary, on, among others, bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, such as Fifth Third. Any such assessments may adversely affect Fifth Third’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Regulation of Fifth Third by the CFTC imposes additional operational and compliance costs.

Title VII of DFA imposes a new regulatory regime on the U.S. derivatives markets. While most of the provisions related to derivatives markets are now in effect, several additional requirements await final regulations from the relevant regulatory agencies for derivatives, the CFTC and the SEC. One aspect of this new regulatory regime for derivatives is that substantial oversight responsibility has been provided to the CFTC, which, as a result, now has a meaningful supervisory role with respect to some of Fifth Third’s businesses. In 2014, Fifth Third Bank provisionally registered as a swap dealer with the CFTC and became subject to new substantive requirements, including real time trade reporting and robust record keeping requirements, business conduct requirements (including daily valuations, disclosure of material risks associated with swaps and disclosure of material incentives and conflicts of interest), and mandatory clearing and exchange trading of all standardized swaps designated by the relevant regulatory agencies as required to be cleared. Although the ultimate impact will depend on the promulgation of all final regulations, Fifth Third‘s derivatives activity will be subject to FRB margin requirements and may also be subject to capital requirements specific to this derivatives activity. These requirements will collectively impose implementation and ongoing compliance burdens on Fifth Third and will introduce additional legal risk (including as a result of newly applicable antifraud and anti-manipulation provisions and private rights of action). Once finalized, the rules may raise the costs and liquidity burden associated with Fifth Third’s derivatives activities and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become the subject of litigation or regulatory or other enforcement proceedings that could result in substantial legal liability and damage to Fifth Third’s reputation.

Fifth Third and certain of its directors and officers have been named from time to time as defendants in various class actions and other litigation relating to Fifth Third’s business and activities. Past, present and future litigation have included or could include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Enforcement authorities may seek admissions of wrongdoing and, in some cases, criminal pleas as part of the resolutions of matters, and any such resolution of a matter involving Fifth Third which could lead to increased exposure to private litigation, could adversely affect Fifth Third’s reputation, and could result in limitations on Fifth Third’s ability to do business in certain jurisdictions. Legal, regulatory and other enforcement proceedings could also result in

200  Fifth Third Bancorp


material adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief, amendments and/or restatements of Fifth Third’s SEC filings and/or financial statements, as applicable and/or determinations of material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, responding to inquiries, investigations, lawsuits and proceedings, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the matter, could be time-consuming and expensive. Like other large financial institutions and companies, Fifth Third is also subject to risk from potential employee misconduct, includingnon-compliance with policies and improper use or disclosure of confidential information. Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory or other enforcement action against Fifth Third could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations and/or cause significant reputational harm to its business. The outcome of lawsuits and regulatory proceedings may be difficult to predict or estimate. Although Fifth Third establishes accruals for legal proceedings when information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, Fifth Third does not have accruals for all legal proceedings where it faces a risk of loss. In addition, due to the inherent subjectivity of the assessments and unpredictability of the outcome of legal proceedings, amounts accrued may not represent the ultimate loss to Fifth Third from the legal proceedings in question. Thus, Fifth Third’s ultimate losses may be higher, and possibly significantly so, than the amounts accrued for legal loss contingencies, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s results of operations. Please see “Legal and Regulatory Proceedings” in Fifth Third’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on specific legal and regulatory proceedings.

Fifth Third’s ability to pay or increase dividends on its common stock or to repurchase its capital stock is restricted.

Fifth Third’s ability to pay dividends or repurchase stock is subject to regulatory requirements and the need to meet regulatory expectations. As part of CCAR, Fifth Third’s capital plan is subject to an annual assessment by the FRB, and the FRB may object to Fifth Third’s capital plan if Fifth Third does not demonstrate an ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine-quarter planning horizon. If the FRB objects to Fifth Third’s capital plan, Fifth Third would be subject to limitations on its ability to make capital distributions (including paying dividends and repurchasing stock).

201  Fifth Third Bancorp


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Bancorp’s executive offices and the main office of Fifth Third Bank are located on Fountain Square Plaza in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio in a32-story office tower, a five-story office building with an attached parking garage and a separateten-story office building known as the Fifth Third Center, the William S. Rowe Building and the 530 Building, respectively. The Bancorp’s main operations campus is located in Cincinnati, Ohio, and is comprised of a three-story building with an attached parking garage known as the George A. Schaefer, Jr. Operations Center, and atwo-story building with surface parking known as the Madisonville Office Building. The Bank owns 100% of these buildings.

At December 31, 2016, the Bancorp, through its banking andnon-banking subsidiaries, operated 1,191 banking centers, of which 859 were owned, 229 were leased and 103 for which the buildings are owned but the land is leased. The banking centers are located in the states of Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Florida, Tennessee, North Carolina, West Virginia, and Georgia. The Bancorp’s significant owned properties are owned free from mortgages and major encumbrances.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE BANCORP

Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors at the meeting of Directors immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The names, ages and positions of the Executive Officers of the Bancorp as of February 24, are listed below along with their business experience during the past five years:

Greg D. Carmichael, 55. Chief Executive Officer of the Bancorp since November 2015 and President since September 2012. Previously, Mr. Carmichael was Chief Operating Officer of the Bancorp from June 2006 to August 2015, Executive Vice President of the Bancorp from June 2006 to September 2012 and Chief Information Officer of the Bancorp from June 2003 to June 2006.

Lars C. Anderson, 55. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bancorp since August 2015. Previously, Mr. Anderson was Vice Chairman of Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Bank since December 2010.

Chad M. Borton, 46. Executive Vice President of the Bancorp since April 2014. Previously, Mr. Borton was Head of Retail Banking for Fifth Third Bank from July 2012 to April 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Borton served in multiple positions at JP Morgan Chase including the Head of Branch Administration from August 2011 to July 2012; Senior Vice President and Market Manager from August 2010 to August 2011; Head of Retail Distribution from 2008 to 2010 and Consumer Bank Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2008.

Frank R. Forrest, 62. Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Bancorp since April 2014. Previously, Mr. Forrest was Executive Vice President and Chief Risk and Credit Officer of the Bancorp since September 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Forrest served with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. From March 2012 until June 2013, Mr. Forrest served as Managing Director and Quality Control Executive for Legacy Asset Services, a division of Bank of America. From September 2008 until March 2012, Mr. Forrest was Managing Director and Global Debt Products Executive for Global Corporate and Investment Banking. Formerly from January 2007 to September 2008, Mr. Forrest was Risk Management Executive for Commercial Banking.

Mark D. Hazel, 51. Senior Vice President and Controller of the Bancorp since February 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Hazel was the Assistant Bancorp Controller since 2006 and was the Controller of Nonbank entities since 2003.

Aravind Immaneni, 46. Executive Vice President and Chief Operations and Technology Officer since November 14, 2016. Previously Mr. Immaneni worked for TD Bank as Executive Vice President and Head of Retail Distribution Strategy & Operations since November 2014, Senior Vice President and Head of Retail Bank Operations from August 2013 to November 2014, and Senior Vice President and Head of Deposit & Debit Operations from February 2011 to August 2013.

James C. Leonard, 47.Executive Vice President since September 2015 and Treasurer of the Bancorp since October 2013. Previously, Mr. Leonard was Senior Vice President from October 2013 to September 2015, the Director of Business Planning and Analysis from 2006 to 2013 and the Chief Financial Officer of the Commercial Banking Division from 2001 to 2006.

Philip R. McHugh, 52. Executive Vice President of the Bancorp since December 2014. Previously, Mr. McHugh was Executive Vice President of Fifth Third Bank since June 2011 and was Senior Vice President of Fifth Third Bank from June 2010 through June 2011. Prior to that, Mr. McHugh was the President and CEO of the Louisville Affiliate of Fifth Third Bank from January 2005 through June 2010.

Jelena McWilliams, 43. Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since January 9, 2017. Previously Ms. McWilliams was Chief Counsel since January 2015 and Deputy Staff Director since July 2016 of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Previously she was Senior Counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs from July 2012 to December 2015. Prior to that, she served as Assistant Chief Counsel to the U.S. Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee and before that as an attorney at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Prior to government service, she practiced as an attorney with Morrison & Foerster LLP in Palo Alto, California and then with Hogan & Hartson LLP (now Hogan Lovells LLP) in Washington, D.C.

Timothy N. Spence, 38. Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer of the Bancorp since September 2015. Previously, Mr. Spence was a senior partner in the Financial Services practice at Oliver Wyman since 2006, a global strategy and risk management consulting firm.

Teresa J. Tanner, 48. Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since September 2015. Previously, Ms. Tanner was the Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Bancorp since February 2010 and Senior Vice President and Director of Enterprise Learning since September 2008. Prior to that, she was Human Resources Senior Vice President and Senior Business Partner for the Information Technology and Central Operations divisions since July 2006. Previously, she was Vice President and Senior Business Partner for Operations since September 2004.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules205-208

Pages

Public Accounting Firm

84

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements

85-89

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

90-170

The schedules for the Bancorp and its subsidiaries are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required, or because the information is set forth in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

The following lists the Exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

2.1

Master Investment Agreement (excluding exhibits and schedules) dated as of March 27, 2009 and amended as of June 30, 2009, among Fifth Third Bank, Fifth Third Financial Corporation, Advent-Kong Blocker Corp., FTPS Holding, LLC and Fifth Third Processing Solutions, LLC. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 2, 2009.

3.1

Amended Articles of Incorporation of Fifth Third Bancorp, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014.

3.2

Code of Regulations of Fifth Third Bancorp, as Amended as of September 15, 2014. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 17, 2014.

4.1

Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 20, 1997 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Debenture Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997.

4.2

Indenture, dated as of May 23, 2003, between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2003.

4.3

Global security representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 4.50% Subordinated Notes due 2018. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2003.

4.4

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2006, between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

4.5

Global security representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 5.45% Subordinated Notes due 2017. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

4.6

Global security representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $250,000,000 Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2016. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

4.7

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 30, 2007 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, to the Junior Subordinated Indenture dated as of May 20, 1997 between Fifth Third and the Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2007.

4.8

Global security dated as of March 4, 2008 representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 8.25% Subordinated Notes due 2038. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. (1)

4.9

Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on

183  Fifth Third Bancorp


Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2008.

4.10

Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 25, 2011 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third and the Trustee. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 25, 2011.

4.11

Global Security dated as of January 25, 2011 representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 3.625% Senior Notes due 2016. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 25, 2011. (2)

4.12

Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 7, 2012 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third and the Trustee. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2012.

4.13

Global Security dated as of March 7, 2012 representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 3.500% Senior Notes due 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2012.

4.14

Deposit Agreement dated May 16, 2013, between Fifth Third Bancorp, as issuer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as depositary and calculation agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as transfer agent and registrar, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts issued thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2013.

4.15

Form of Certificate Representing the 5.10% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2013.

4.16

Form of Depositary Receipt for the 5.10% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2013.

4.17

Global Security dated as of November 20, 2013 representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 4.30% Subordinated Notes due 2024. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2013.

4.18

Deposit Agreement dated December 9, 2013, between Fifth Third Bancorp, as issuer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as depositary and calculation agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as transfer agent and registrar, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts issued thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2013.

4.19

Form of Certificate Representing the 6.625% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2013.

4.20

Form of Depositary Receipt for the 6.625% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2013.

4.21

Deposit Agreement dated June 5, 2014, among Fifth Third Bancorp, as issuer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as depositary and calculation agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as transfer agent and registrar, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts issued thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

4.22

Form of Certificate Representing the 4.90% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

4.23

Form of Depositary Receipt for the 4.90% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

4.24

Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 28, 2014 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third Bancorp and the Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 28, 2014.

4.25

Global Security dated as of February 28, 2014, representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 in principal amount of its 2.30% Senior Notes due 2019. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 28, 2014.

4.26

Deposit Agreement dated June 5, 2014, among Fifth Third Bancorp, as issuer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as depositary and calculation agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as transfer agent and registrar, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts issued thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

4.27

Form of Certificate Representing the 4.90% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

4.28

Form of Depositary Receipt for the 4.90% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

10.1

Fifth Third Bancorp Unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. *

10.2

Indenture effective November 19, 1992 between Fifth Third Bancorp, Issuer and NBD Bank, N.A., Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 18, 1992 and as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 33-54134.

10.3

Fifth Third Bancorp Master Profit Sharing Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.*

10.4

First Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp Master Profit Sharing Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.*

10.5

Second Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp Master Profit Sharing Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.*

10.6

Third Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp Master Profit Sharing Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.7

Fifth Third Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated.*

10.8

The Fifth Third Bancorp Master Retirement Plan, as Amended and Restated.*

10.9

Fifth Third Bancorp Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated February 19, 2004.*

10.10

Fifth Third Bancorp 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated March 6, 2008.*

10.11

Fifth Third Bancorp 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated March 6, 2014.*

10.12

Amended and Restated Fifth Third Bancorp 1993 Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.*

10.13

Fifth Third Bancorp Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s

184  Fifth Third Bancorp


Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.*

10.14

Amendment to the Fifth Third Bancorp Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated.*

10.15

Fifth Third Bancorp Stock Option Gain Deferral Plan. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated February 9, 2001.*

10.16

Amendment No. 1 to Fifth Third Bancorp Stock Option Gain Deferral Plan. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2006. *

10.17

Amended and Restated First National Bankshares of Florida, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to First National Bankshares of Florida, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. *

10.18

Fifth Third Bancorp Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, effective January 1, 2015. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2014.*

10.19

Form of Executive Agreement effective February 3, 2014, between Fifth Third Bancorp and Tayfun Tuzun. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2014.*

10.20

Form of Executive Agreement effective February 3, 2014, between Fifth Third Bancorp and Frank R. Forrest. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2014.*

10.21

Executive Agreement effective August 19, 2014, between Fifth Third Bancorp and Chad M. Borton. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.*

10.22

Form of Amended Executive Agreement effective January 19, 2012, between Fifth Third Bancorp and Daniel T. Poston. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 24, 2012. *

10.23

Warrant dated June 30, 2009 issued by Vantiv Holding, LLC to Fifth Third Bank. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.24

Second Amended & Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (excluding certain exhibits) dated as of March 21, 2012 by and among Vantiv, Inc., Fifth Third Bank, FTPS Partners, LLC, Vantiv Holding, LLC and each person who becomes a member after March 21, 2012. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.25

Amendment and Restatement Agreement and Reaffirmation (excluding certain schedules) dated as of June 30, 2009 among Fifth Third Processing Solutions, LLC, FTPS Holding, LLC, Card Management Company, LLC, Fifth Third Holdings, LLC and Fifth Third Bank. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 2, 2009.

10.26

Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 21, 2012 by and among Vantiv, Inc., Fifth Third Bank, FTPS Partners, LLC, JPDN Enterprises, LLC and certain stockholders of Vantiv, Inc. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.27

Exchange Agreement dated as of March 21, 2012 by and among Vantiv, Inc., Vantiv Holding, LLC, Fifth Third Bank, FTPS Partners, LLC and such other holders of Class B Units and Class C Non-Voting Units that are from time to time parties of the Exchange Agreement. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.28

Recapitalization Agreement dated as of March 21, 2012 by and among Vantiv, Inc., Vantiv Holding, LLC, Fifth Third Bank, FTPS Partners, LLC, JPDN Enterprises, LLC and certain stockholders of Vantiv, Inc. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.29

Description of Vantiv, Inc. Director Compensation for Greg D. Carmichael. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012. On May 10, 2012, Daniel T. Poston was elected as a Class B Director of Vantiv, Inc. Mr. Poston is subject to a substantially similar compensation arrangement as described in Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.*

10.30

Stock Appreciation Right Award Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.31

Performance Share Award Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.32

Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for Directors). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.33

Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for Executive Officers). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.34

Stock Appreciation Right Award Agreement.*

10.35

Performance Share Award Agreement.*

10.36

Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for Directors).*

10.37

Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for Executive Officers).*

10.38

Master Confirmation, as supplemented by a Supplemental Confirmation, for accelerated share repurchase transaction dated October 20, 2014 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch**

12.1

Computations of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

12.2

Computations of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements.

21

Fifth Third Bancorp Subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2014.

23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm-Deloitte & Touche LLP.

31(i)

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer.

31(ii)

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.

32(i)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer.

32(ii)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.

101

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text and in detail.

(1)Fifth Third Bancorp also entered into an identical security on March 4, 2008 representing an additional $500,000,000 of its 8.25% Subordinated Notes due 2038.
(2)Fifth Third Bancorp also entered into an identical security on January 25, 2011 representing an additional $500,000,000 of its 3.625% Senior Notes due 2016.

*    Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

**  An application for confidential treatment for selected portions of this exhibit has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

185  Fifth Third Bancorp


SIGNATURES

209

183  Fifth Third Bancorp


PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

General Information

Fifth Third Bancorp (the “Bancorp”), an Ohio corporation organized in 1975, is a bank holding company (“BHC”) as defined by the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), and is registered as such with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”).

The Bancorp is a diversified financial services company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $142 billion in assets and operates 1,191 full-service Banking Centers, and 2,495 ATMs in Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Florida, Tennessee, West Virginia, Georgia and North Carolina. Fifth Third operates four main businesses: Commercial Banking, Branch Banking, Consumer Lending, and Wealth & Asset Management. Fifth Third also has a 17.9% interest in Vantiv Holding, LLC. The carrying value of the Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC was $414 million as of December 31, 2016. Fifth Third is among the largest money managers in the Midwest and, as of December 31, 2016, had $315 billion in assets under care, of which it managed $31 billion for individuals, corporations andnot-for-profit organizations.Investor information andpress releases can be viewed atwww.53.com. Fifth Third’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ® Global Select Market under the symbol “FITB.”

The Bancorp’s subsidiaries provide a wide range of financial products and services to the retail, commercial, financial, governmental, educational, energy and medical sectors, including a wide variety of checking, savings and money market accounts, treasury management products, wealth management solutions, payments and commerce solutions, insurance services and credit products such as credit cards, installment loans, mortgage loans and leases. These products and services are delivered through a variety of channels and methods including the Company’s Banking Centers, other offices, telephone sales, the internet and mobile applications. Fifth Third Bank has deposit insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) through the Deposit Insurance Fund. Refer to Exhibit 21 filed as an attachment to this Annual Report on Form10-K for a list of subsidiaries of the Bancorp as of December 31, 2016.

The Bancorp derives the majority of its revenues from the U.S. Revenue from foreign countries and external customers domiciled in foreign countries is immaterial to the Bancorp’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Additional information regarding the Bancorp’s businesses is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Availability of Financial Information

The Bancorp files reports with the SEC. Those reports include the annual report on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Q, current reports on Form8-K and proxy statements, as well as any amendments to those reports. The public may read and copy any materials the Bancorp files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The Bancorp’s annual report on Form10-K, quarterly reports on Form

10-Q, current reports onForm 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are accessible at no cost on the Bancorp’s web site at https://www.53.com on a same day basis after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Competition

The Bancorp competes for deposits, loans and other banking services in its principal geographic markets as well as in selected national markets as opportunities arise. In addition to traditional financial institutions, the Bancorp competes with securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors and insurance companies as well as financial technology companies. These companies compete across geographic boundaries and provide customers with meaningful alternatives to traditional banking services in nearly all significant products. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in regulation, changes in technology, product delivery systems and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. These competitive trends are likely to continue.

Acquisitions and Investments

The Bancorp’s strategy for growth includes strengthening its presence in core markets, expanding into contiguous markets and broadening its product offerings while taking into account the integration and other risks of growth. The Bancorp evaluates strategic acquisition and investment opportunities and conducts due diligence activities in connection with possible transactions. As a result, discussions, and in some cases, negotiations may take place and future acquisitions involving cash, debt or equity securities may occur. These typically involve the payment of a premium over book value and current market price, and therefore, some dilution of book value and net income per share may occur with any future transactions.

Regulation and Supervision

In addition to the generally applicable state and federal laws governing businesses and employers, the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to extensive regulation by federal and state laws and regulations applicable to financial institutions and their parent companies. Virtually all aspects of the business of the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to specific requirements or restrictions and general regulatory oversight. The principal objectives of state and federal banking laws and regulations and the supervision, regulation and examination of banks and their parent companies (such as the Bancorp) by bank regulatory agencies are the maintenance of the safety and soundness of financial institutions, maintenance of the federal deposit insurance system and the protection of consumers or classes of consumers, rather than the specific protection of shareholders of a bank or the parent company of a bank. The Bancorp and its subsidiaries are subject to an extensive regulatory framework of complex and comprehensive federal and state laws and regulations addressing the provision of banking and other financial services and other aspects of the Bancorp’s businesses and operations. Regulation and regulatory oversight have increased significantly since 2010 as a result of the passage of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “DFA”).

184  Fifth Third Bancorp


The DFA imposes regulatory requirements and oversight over banks and other financial institutions in a number of ways, among which are (i) creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) to regulate consumer financial products and services; (ii) creating the Financial Stability Oversight Council to identify and impose additional regulatory oversight on large financial firms; (iii) granting orderly liquidation authority to the FDIC for the liquidation of financial corporations that pose a risk to the financial system of the U.S.; (iv) requiring financial institutions to draft a resolution plan that contemplates the dissolution of the enterprise and submit that resolution plan to both the Federal Reserve and the FDIC; (v) limiting debit card interchange fees; (vi) adopting certain changes to shareholder rights and responsibilities, including a shareholder “say on pay” vote on executive compensation; (vii) strengthening the SEC’s powers to regulate securities markets; (viii) regulating OTC derivative markets; (ix) restricting variable-rate lending by requiring the ability to repay to be determined for variable-rate loans by using the maximum rate that will apply during the first five years of a variable-rate loan term, and making more loans subject to provisions for higher cost loans, new disclosures, and certain other revisions; (x) changing the base upon which the deposit insurance assessment is assessed from deposits to, substantially, average consolidated assets minus equity; and (xi) amending the Truth in Lending Act with respect to mortgage originations, including originator compensation, minimum repayment standards, and prepayment considerations. To the extent the following material describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statute or regulation. In addition, due to the volume of regulations required by the DFA, not all proposed or final regulations that may have an impact on the Bancorp or its banking subsidiary are necessarily discussed.

Regulators

The Bancorp and/or its banking subsidiary are subject to regulation and supervision primarily by the FRB, the CFPB and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions (the “Division”) and additionally by certain other functional regulators and self-regulatory organizations. The Bancorp is also subject to regulation by the SEC by virtue of its status as a public company and due to the nature of some of its businesses. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to regulation by the FDIC, which insures the bank’s deposits as permitted by law.

The federal and state laws and regulations that are applicable to banks and to BHCs regulate, among other matters, the scope of their business, their activities, their investments, their capital and liquidity levels, their reserves against deposits, the timing of the availability of deposited funds, the amount of loans to individual and related borrowers and the nature, the amount of and collateral for certain loans, and the amount of interest that may be charged on loans as applicable. Various federal and state consumer laws and regulations also affect the services provided to consumers.

The Bancorp and/or its banking subsidiary are required to file various reports with, and is subject to examination by regulators, including the FRB and the Division. The FRB, the Division and the CFPB have the authority to issue orders for BHCs and/or banks to cease and desist from certain banking practices and violations of conditions imposed by, or violations of agreements with, the FRB, the Division and the CFPB. Certain of the Bancorp’s and/or its banking subsidiary regulators are also empowered to assess civil money penalties against companies or individuals in certain situations, such as when there is a violation of a law or regulation.

Applicable state and federal laws also grant certain regulators the authority to impose additional requirements and restrictions on the activities of the Bancorp and or its banking subsidiary and, in some situations, the imposition of such additional requirements and restrictions will not be publicly available information.

Acquisitions

The BHCA requires the prior approval of the FRB for a BHC to acquire substantially all the assets of a bank or to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of the voting shares of any bank, BHC or savings association, or to increase any suchnon-majority ownership or control of any bank, BHC or savings association, or to merge or consolidate with any BHC.

The BHCA prohibits a BHC from acquiring a direct or indirect interest in or control of more than 5% of any class of the voting shares of a company that is not a bank or a BHC and from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to its banking subsidiaries, except that it may engage in and may own shares of companies engaged in certain activities the FRB has determined to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be proper incident thereto.

Financial Holding Companies

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (“GLBA”) permits a qualifying BHC to become a financial holding company (“FHC”) and thereby to engage directly or indirectly in a broader range of activities than those permitted for a BHC under the BHCA. Permitted activities for a FHC include securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting and brokerage, merchant banking and other activities that are declared by the FRB, in cooperation with the Treasury Department, to be “financial in nature or incidental thereto” or are declared by the FRB unilaterally to be “complementary” to financial activities. In addition, a FHC is allowed to conduct permissible new financial activities or acquire permissiblenon-bank financial companies withafter-the-fact notice to the FRB. A BHC may elect to become a FHC if each of its banking subsidiaries is well capitalized, is well managed and has at least a “Satisfactory” rating under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”). The DFA also extended the well capitalized and well managed requirement to the BHC. In 2000, the Bancorp elected and qualified for FHC status under the GLBA. To maintain FHC status, a holding company must continue to meet certain requirements. The failure to meet such requirements could result in material restrictions on the activities of the FHC and may also adversely affect the FHC’s ability to enter into certain transactions or obtain necessary approvals in connection therewith, as well as loss of FHC status. If restrictions are imposed on the activities of an FHC, such information may not necessarily be available to the public.

Dividends

The Bancorp depends in part upon dividends received from its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including its indirect banking subsidiary, to fund its activities, including the payment of dividends. The Bancorp and its banking subsidiary are subject to various federal and state restrictions on their ability to pay dividends. The FRB has authority to prohibit BHCs from paying dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice.

185  Fifth Third Bancorp


The FRB has indicated generally that it may be an unsafe or unsound practice for BHCs to pay dividends unless a BHC’s net income is sufficient to fund the dividends and the expected rate of earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The ability to pay dividends may be further limited by provisions of the DFA and implanting regulations (see Systematically Significant Companies and Capital).

Source of Strength

Under long-standing FRB policy and now as codified in the DFA, a BHC is expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its banking subsidiaries and to commit resources to their support. This support may be required at times when the BHC may not have the resources to provide it.

FDIC Assessments

Pursuant to the DFA, in 2011 the FDIC revised the framework by which insured depository institutions with more than $10 billion in assets (“large IDIs”) are assessed for purposes of payments to the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”).

Prior to the passage of the DFA, a large IDI’s DIF premiums principally were based on the size of an IDI’s domestic deposit base. The DFA changed the assessment base from a large IDI’s domestic deposit base to its total assets less tangible equity. In addition to potentially greatly increasing the size of a large IDI’s assessment base, the expansion of the assessment base affords the FDIC much greater flexibility to vary its assessment system based upon the different asset classes that large IDIs normally hold on their balance sheets.

To implement this provision, the FDIC created an assessment scheme vastly different from the deposit-based system. Under the new system, large IDIs are assessed under a complex “scorecard” methodology that seeks to capture both the probability that an individual large IDI will fail and the magnitude of the impact on the DIF if such a failure occurs.

During the first quarter of 2016, the FDIC issued a final rule implementing a 4.5 bps surcharge on the quarterly FDIC insurance assessments of insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more. The Bancorp became subject to the FDIC surcharge and reduced regular FDIC insurance assessments on July 1, 2016. The surcharges will continue through the quarter that the DIF reserve ratio first reaches or exceeds 1.35% of insured deposits, but not later than December 31, 2018. If the reserve ratio does not reach 1.35% by December 31, 2018, the FDIC will impose a shortfall assessment on March 31, 2019, on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more.

Transactions with Affiliates

Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, restrict transactions between a bank and its affiliates (as defined in Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act), including a parent BHC. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to certain restrictions, including but not limited to restrictions on loans to its affiliates, on investments in the stock or securities thereof, on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower, and on the issuance of a guarantee or letter of credit on their behalf. Among other things, these restrictions limit the amount of such transactions, require collateral in prescribed amounts for extensions of credit, prohibit the purchase of low quality assets and require that the terms of such transactions be substantially equivalent to terms of comparable transactions withnon-affiliates. Generally, the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is limited in its extension of credit to any affiliate to 10% of the banking subsidiary’s capital stock and surplus and its extension of credit to all affiliates to 20% of the banking subsidiary’s capital stock and surplus.

Community Reinvestment Act

The CRA generally requires insured depository institutions, including the Bank, to identify the communities they serve and to make loans and investments and provide services that meet the credit needs of those communities and the CRA requires the FRB to evaluate the performance of such depository institutions with respect to these CRA obligations. Depository institutions must maintain comprehensive records of their CRA activities for purposes of these examinations. The FRB must take into account the record of performance of depository institutions in meeting the credit needs of the entire community served, includinglow- and moderate-income neighborhoods. For purposes of CRA examinations, the FRB rates such institutions’ compliance with the CRA as “Outstanding,” “Satisfactory,” “Needs to Improve” or “Substantial Noncompliance.” The Bank must be well-capitalized, well-managed and maintain at least a “Satisfactory” CRA rating for the Bancorp to retain its status as a financial holding company. Failure to meet these requirements could result in the FRB placing limitations or conditions on the Bancorp’s activities (and the commencement of new activities, including merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions) and could ultimately result in the loss of financial holding company status. The FRB conducted a regularly scheduled examination covering 2011 through 2013 to determine the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary’s compliance with the CRA. This CRA examination resulted in a rating of “Needs to Improve”. The Bank believes that the “Needs to Improve” rating reflects legacy issues that have been remediated during the intervening three years. While the Bank’s CRA rating is “Needs to Improve” the Bancorp and the Bank face limitations and conditions on certain activities, including the commencement of new activities and merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions. The Bank’s next CRA examination commenced during the fourth quarter of 2016.

Capital Generally

The FRB has established capital guidelines for BHCs and FHCs. The FRB, the Division and the FDIC have also issued regulations establishing capital requirements for banks. Failure to meet capital requirements could subject the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary to a variety of restrictions and enforcement actions. In addition, as discussed previously, the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary must remain well capitalized and well managed for the Bancorp to retain its status as a FHC.

Systemically Significant Companies and Capital

Title I of the DFA created a new regulatory regime for large BHCs. U.S. BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, including Fifth Third, are subject to enhanced prudential standards and early remediation requirements under Title I. Title I of the DFA established a broad framework for identifying, applying heightened supervision and regulation to, and (as necessary) limiting the size and activities of systemically significant financial companies.

The DFA required the FRB to impose enhanced capital and risk-management standards on these firms and mandated the FRB to conduct annual stress tests on all BHCs with $50 billion or more in assets to determine whether they have adequate capital available to absorb losses in baseline, adverse, or severely adverse economic conditions. In November 2011, the FRB adopted final rules requiring BHCs with $50 billion or more in consolidated assets to submit capital plans to the FRB on an annual basis.

186  Fifth Third Bancorp


Under the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process, the FRB annually evaluates an institution’s capital adequacy, internal capital adequacy, assessment processes and capital distribution plans such as dividend payments and stock repurchases. Banks are also required to report certain data to the FRB on a quarterly basis to allow the FRB to monitor progress against the approved capital plans.

The CCAR process is intended to help ensure that BHCs have robust, forward-looking capital planning processes that account for each company’s unique risks and that permit continued operations during times of economic and financial stress. The mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected uses and sources of capital over a nine-quarter planning horizon, a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon, a discussion of any expected changes to the Bancorp’s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity, a detailed description of the Bancorp’s process for assessing capital adequacy and the Bancorp’s capital policy. The stress tests require increased involvement by boards of directors in stress testing and public disclosure of the results of both the FRB’s annual stress tests and a BHC’s annual supervisory stress tests, and semi-annual internal stress tests.

In 2014, the FRB amended its capital planning and stress testing rules to, among other things, generally limit a BHC’s ability to make quarterly capital distributions – that is, dividends and share repurchases – commencing April 1, 2015 if the amount of the bank’s actual cumulative quarterly capital issuances of instruments that qualify as regulatory capital are less than the bank had indicated in its submitted capital plan as to which it received anon-objection from the FRB. For example, if the BHC issued a smaller amount of additional common stock than it had stated in its capital plan, it would be required to reduce common dividends and/or the amount of common stock repurchases so that the dollar amount of capital distributions, net of the dollar amount of additional common stock issued (“net distributions”), is no greater than the dollar amount of net distributions relating to its common stock included in its capital plan, as measured on an aggregate basis beginning in the third quarter of the nine-quarter planning horizon through the end of the then current quarter. However, not raising sufficient amounts of common stock as planned would not affect distributions related to Additional Tier I Capital instruments and/ or Tier II Capital. These limitations also contain several important qualifications and exceptions, including that scheduled dividend payments on (as opposed to repurchases of) a BHC’s Additional Tier I Capital and Tier II Capital instruments are not restricted if the BHC fails to issue a sufficient amount of such instruments as planned, as well as provisions for certain de minimis excess distributions. BHCs with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more are required to submit their 2017 capital plan to the FRB by April 5, 2017.

In December of 2010 and revised in June of 2011, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) issued Basel III, a global regulatory framework, to enhance international capital standards. Basel III is designed to materially improve the quality of regulatory capital and introduces a new minimum common equity requirement. Basel III also raises the minimum capital requirements and introduces capital conservation and countercyclical buffers to induce banking organizations to hold capital in excess of regulatory minimums. In addition, Basel III establishes an international leverage standard for internationally active banks.

In July of 2013, U.S. banking regulators approved the final enhanced regulatory capital rules (“Final Capital Rules”). The Final Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to BHCs and their depository institution subsidiaries as compared to the previous U.S. risk-based capital and leverage ratio rules, and thereby implement certain provisions of the DFA.

The Final Capital Rules, among other things, (i) introduce a new capital measure “Common Equity Tier I” (“CET1”), (ii) specify that Tier I capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier I capital” instruments meeting specified requirements, (iii) define CET1 narrowly by requiring that most adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital and (iv) expand the scope of the adjustments as compared to existing regulations. CET1 capital consists of common stock instruments that meet the eligibility criteria in the final rules, including; common stock and related surplus, net of treasury stock and retained earnings, certain minority interests and accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), if elected.

When fullyphased-in on January 1, 2019, the Final Capital Rules require banking organizations to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% CET1 ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0% upon full implementation), (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier I capital ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum Tier I capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation), (iii) a minimum ratio of total capital (that is, Tier I plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer isphased-in, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation) and (iv) a minimum Tier I leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier I capital to adjusted average consolidated assets.

Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer will face limitations on the payment of dividends, common stock repurchases and discretionary cash payments to executive officers based on the amount of the shortfall.

The Final Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets dependent upon future taxable income and significant investments innon-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Under the Final Capital Rules, the Bancorp made aone-time election (the“Opt-out Election”) to filter certain AOCI components, comparable to the treatment under the current general risk-based capital rule.

The Final Capital Rules were effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject tophase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions. Although not currently required, Fifth Third Bancorp believes the aforementioned capital ratios under the revised Final Capital Rules meet or exceed the ratios on a fullyphased-in basis. Refer to theNon-GAAP Financial Measures section of MD&A for an estimated CET1 capital ratio under the Basel III Final Rule (fullyphased-in) as of December 31, 2016.

187  Fifth Third Bancorp


In February 2014, the FRB approved a final rule implementing several heightened prudential requirements. The rules require BHCs with $10 billion or more in consolidated assets to establish risk committees and require BHCs with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets to comply with enhanced liquidity and overall risk management standards, includingcompany-run liquidity stress testing and a buffer of highly liquid assets based on projected funding needs for various time horizons, including 30, 60, and 90 days. These liquidity-related provisions are designed to be complementary, and in addition to the Final LCR Rule applicable to BHCs (as discussed below). Rules to implement two other components of the DFA’s enhanced prudential standards –single-counterparty credit limits and early remediation requirements– are still under consideration by the FRB. Fifth Third has conducted a self evaluation of all the requirements within the enhanced prudential standards, and believe the necessary steps have been taken to ensure compliance with all requirements regarding liquidity, risk exposures, and early remediation.

Liquidity Regulation

Liquidity risk management and supervision have become increasingly important since the financial crisis. On September 3, 2014, the FRB and other banking regulators adopted final rules (“Final LCR Rule”) implementing a U.S. version of the Basel Committee’s Liquidity Coverage Ratio requirement (“LCR”), which is designed to ensure that the banking entity maintains an adequate level of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) equal to the entity’s expected net cash outflow for a30-day time horizon (or, if greater, 25% of its expected total cash outflow) under an acute liquidity stress scenario. The rules apply in modified form to banking organizations, such as the Bancorp, having $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets but less than $250 billion. The LCR is the ratio of an institution’s stock of HQLA (the numerator) over projected net cashout-flows over the30-day horizon (the denominator), in each case, as calculated pursuant to the Final LCR Rule. Once fullyphased-in, a subject institution must maintain an LCR equal to at least 100% in order to satisfy this regulatory requirement. Only specific classes of assets, including U.S. Treasuries, other U.S. government obligations and agency mortgaged-backed securities, qualify under the rule as HQLA, with classes of assets deemed relatively less liquid and/or subject to greater degree of credit risk subject to certain haircuts and caps for purposes of calculating the numerator under the Final LCR Rule. The total net cash outflows amount is determined under the rule by applying certain hypothetical outflow and inflow rates, which reflect certain standardized stressed assumptions, against the balances of the banking organization’s funding sources, obligations, transactions and assets over the30-day stress period. Inflows that can be included to offset outflows are limited to 75% of outflows (which effectively means that banking organizations must hold high-quality liquid assets equal to 25% of outflows even if outflows perfectly match inflows over the stress period). The total net cash outflow amount for the modified LCR applicable to the Bancorp is capped at 70% of the outflow rate that applies to the full LCR.

The initial compliance date for the modified LCR was January 31, 2016, with the requirement fullyphased-in on January 1, 2017. The LCR is a minimum requirement, and the FRB can impose additional liquidity requirements as a supervisory matter.

In addition, the Bancorp is also subject to the liquidity-related requirements of the enhanced prudential supervision rules adopted by the FRB under Section 165 of the DFA, as described above. As of December 31, 2016, the Bancorp’s modified LCR complied with the fullyphased-in LCR requirements which became effective on January 1, 2017.

In addition to the LCR, the Basel III framework also included a second standard, referred to as the net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”), which is designed to promote moremedium-and long-term funding of the assets and activities of banks over aone-year time horizon. In May, 2016, the federal banking agencies proposed an NSFR Rule. As proposed the most stringent requirements would apply to firms with $250 billion or more in assets or $10 billion or more inon-balance sheet foreign exposure. Holding companies with less than $250 billion, but more than $50 billion in assets and less than $10 billion inon-balance foreign exposure, such as the Bancorp, would be subject to a less stringent, modified NFSR requirement.

Privacy

The FRB, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies have adopted final guidelines (the “Guidelines) for safeguarding confidential, personal customer information. The Guidelines require each financial institution, under the supervision and ongoing oversight of its Board of Directors or an appropriate committee thereof, to create, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program designed to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such information and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer. The Bancorp has adopted a customer information security program that has been approved by the Bancorp’s Board of Directors.

The GLBA requires financial institutions to implement policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of nonpublic personal information about consumers tonon-affiliated third parties. In general, the statute requires explanations to consumers on policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of such nonpublic personal information, and, except as otherwise required by law, prohibits disclosing such information except as provided in the banking subsidiary’s policies and procedures. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary has implemented a privacy policy.

Anti-Money Laundering

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”), designed to deny terrorists and others the ability to obtain access to the United States financial system, has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act, as implemented by various federal regulatory agencies, requires financial institutions, including the Bancorp and its subsidiaries, to implement new policies and procedures or amend existing policies and procedures with respect to, among other matters, anti-money laundering, compliance, suspicious activity and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on customers. The Patriot Act and its underlying regulations also permit information sharing for counter-terrorist purposes between federal law enforcement agencies and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions, subject to certain conditions, and require the FRB (and other federal banking agencies) to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering activities when considering applications filed under Section 3 of the BHCA or the Bank Merger Act. The Bancorp’s Board has approved policies and procedures that are believed to be compliant with the Patriot Act.

188  Fifth Third Bancorp


Exempt Brokerage Activities

The GLBA amended the federal securities laws to eliminate the blanket exceptions that banks traditionally have had from the definition of “broker” and “dealer.” The GLBA also required that there be certain transactional activities that would not be “brokerage” activities, which banks could effect without having to register as a broker. In September 2007, the FRB and SEC approved Regulation R to govern bank securities activities. Various exemptions permit banks to conduct activities that would otherwise constitute brokerage activities under the securities laws. Those exemptions include conducting brokerage activities related to trust, fiduciary and similar services, certain services and also conducting a de minimis number of riskless principal transactions, certain asset-backed transactions and certain securities lending transactions. The Bancorp only conductsnon-exempt brokerage activities through its affiliated registered broker-dealer.

Financial Stability Oversight Council

The DFA created the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”), which is chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury and composed of expertise from various financial services regulators. The FSOC has responsibility for identifying risks and responding to emerging threats to financial stability.

Executive Compensation

The DFA provides for a say on pay for shareholders of all public companies. Under the DFA, each company must give its shareholders the opportunity to vote on the compensation of its executives at least once every three years. The DFA also adds disclosure and voting requirements for golden parachute compensation that is payable to named executive officers in connection with sale transactions. The SEC adopted rules finalizing these say on pay provisions in January 2011.

Pursuant to the DFA, in June 2012, the SEC adopted a final rule directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing classes of equity securities if a company’s compensation committee members are not independent. The rule also provides that a company’s compensation committee may only select a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor after taking into consideration factors to be identified by the SEC that affect the independence of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other advisor.

The SEC is required under the DFA to issue rules obligating companies to disclose in proxy materials for annual meetings of shareholders information that shows the relationship between executive compensation actually paid to their named executive officers and their financial performance, taking into account any change in the value of the shares of a company’s stock and dividends or distributions. The DFA also requires the SEC to propose rules requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the compensation of its chief executive officer to the median compensation of its employees. The SEC adopted final rules implementing the pay ratio provisions in August 2015. For a registrant with a fiscal year ending on December 31, such as Bancorp, the pay ratio will be required as part of its executive compensation disclosure in proxy statements or Form10-Ks filed starting in 2018.

The DFA provides that the SEC must issue rules directing the stock exchanges to prohibit listing any security of a company unless the company develops and implements a policy providing for disclosure of the policy of the company on incentive-based compensation that is based on financial information required to be reported under the securities laws and that, in the event the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the company will recover from any current or former executive officer of the company who received incentive-based compensation during the three-year period preceding the date on which the company is required to prepare the restatement based on the erroneous data, any exceptional compensation above what would have been paid under the restatement.

The DFA requires the SEC to adopt a rule to require that each company disclose in the proxy materials for its annual meetings whether an employee or board member is permitted to purchase financial instruments designed to hedge or offset decreases in the market value of equity securities granted as compensation or otherwise held by the employee or board member.

In June 2016, the SEC and the federal banking agencies issued a proposed rule to implement the incentive-based compensation provisions of section 956 of the DFA. The proposal would establish new requirements for incentive-based compensation at institutions with assets of at least $1 billion.

Corporate Governance

The DFA clarifies that the SEC may, but is not required to promulgate rules that would require that a company’s proxy materials include a nominee for the board of directors submitted by a shareholder. Although the SEC promulgated rules to accomplish this, these rules were invalidated by a federal appeals court decision. The SEC has said that they will not challenge the ruling, but has not ruled out the possibility that new rules could be proposed.

The DFA requires stock exchanges to have rules prohibiting their members from voting securities that they do not beneficially own (unless they have received voting instructions from the beneficial owner) with respect to the election of a member of the board of directors (other than an uncontested election of directors of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940), executive compensation or any other significant matter, as determined by the SEC by rule.

Debit Card Interchange Fees

The DFA provides for a set of new rules requiring that interchange transaction fees for electric debit transactions be “reasonable” and proportional to certain costs associated with processing the transactions. The FRB was given authority to, among other things, establish standards for assessing whether interchange fees are reasonable and proportional. In June 2011, the FRB issued a final rule establishing certain standards and prohibitions pursuant to the DFA, including establishing standards for debit card interchange fees and allowing for an upward adjustment if the issuer develops and implements policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent fraud. The provisions regarding debit card interchange fees and the fraud adjustment became effective October 1, 2011. The rules impose requirements on the Bancorp and its banking subsidiary and may negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.

189  Fifth Third Bancorp


On July 31, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting summary judgment to the plaintiffs in a case challenging certain provisions of the FRB’s rule concerning electronic debit card transaction fees and network exclusivity arrangements (the “Current Rule”) that were adopted to implement Section 1075 of the DFA, known as the Durbin Amendment. The Court held that, in adopting the Current Rule, the FRB violated the Durbin Amendment’s provisions concerning which costs are allowed to be taken into account for purposes of setting fees that are reasonable and proportional to the costs incurred by the issuer and therefore the Current Rule’s maximum permissible fees were too high. In addition, the Court held that the Current Rule’s networknon-exclusivity provisions concerning unaffiliated payment networks for debit cards also violated the Durbin Amendment. The Court vacated the Current Rule, but stayed its ruling to provide the FRB an opportunity to replace the invalidated portions. The FRB appealed this decision and on March 21, 2014, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. The merchants have filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, on January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the Circuit Court reversal, thereby largely upholding the Current Rule and substantially reducing uncertainty surrounding debit card interchange fees the Bancorp is permitted to charge.

FDIC Matters and Resolution Planning

Title II of the DFA creates an orderly liquidation process that the FDIC can employ for failing systemically important financial companies. Additionally, the DFA also codifies many of the temporary changes that had already been implemented, such as permanently increasing the amount of deposit insurance to $250,000.

In January 2012, the FDIC issued a final rule that requires an insured depository institution with $50 billion or more in total assets to submit periodic contingency plans to the FDIC for resolution in the event of the institution’s failure. The Bancorp’s banking subsidiary is subject to this rule and submitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of December 31, 2015.

In October 2011, the FRB and FDIC issued a final rule implementing the resolution planning requirements of Section 165(d) of the DFA. The final rule requires BHCs with assets of $50 billion or more and nonbank financial firms designated by FSOC for supervision by the FRB to annually submit resolution plans to the FDIC and FRB. Each plan shall describe the company’s strategy for rapid and orderly resolution in bankruptcy during times of financial distress.    Under the final rule, companies must submit their initial resolution plans on a staggered basis. The Bancorp submitted its most recent resolution plan pursuant to this rule as of December 31, 2015. In August 2016, the FDIC and the FRB announced that 38 firms, including Fifth Third, will be required to submit their next resolutions by December 31, 2017.

Proprietary Trading and Investing in Certain Funds

The DFA sets forth new restrictions on banking organizations’ ability to engage in proprietary trading and sponsors of or invest in private equity and hedge funds (the “Volcker Rule”). The final regulations implementing the Volcker Rule (“Final Rules”) were adopted on December 10, 2013. The Volcker Rule generally prohibits any banking entity from (i) engaging in short-term proprietary trading for its own account and (ii) sponsoring or

acquiring any ownership interest in a private equity or hedge fund. The Volcker Rule and Final Rules contain a number of exceptions. The Volcker Rule permits transactions in the securities of the U.S. government and its agencies, certain government-sponsored enterprises and states and their political subdivisions, as well as certain investments in small business investment companies. Transactions on behalf of customers and in connection with certain underwriting and market making activities, as well as risk-mitigating hedging activities and certain foreign banking activities are also permitted. The Final Rules exclude certain funds from the prohibition on fund ownership and sponsorship including wholly-owned subsidiaries, joint ventures, and acquisitions vehicles, as well as SEC registered investment companies.De minimis ownership of private equity or hedge funds is also permitted under the Final Rules. In addition to the general prohibition on sponsorship and investment, the Volcker rule contains additional requirements applicable to any private equity or hedge fund that is sponsored by the banking entity or for which it serves as investment manager or investment advisor. The Bancorp is required under the Final Rules to demonstrate that it has a Volcker Rule compliance program. Further, with respect to covered funds that are “illiquid funds”, the FRB has the authority to grant up to five more years for the Bancorp to conform to the final Volcker Rule with respect to such illiquid funds.

Derivatives

Title VII of the DFA includes measures to broaden the scope of derivative instruments subject to regulation by requiring clearing and exchange trading of certain derivatives, imposing new capital and margin requirements for certain market participants and imposing position limits on certainover-the-counter derivatives. Fifth Third Bank is provisionally registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a swap dealer. As with the Volcker Rule, the Bank is required to demonstrate that it has a satisfactory compliance program to monitor its activities under these regulations. Certain regulations implementing Title VII of the DFA have not been finalized. The ultimate impact of these regulations, and the time it will take to comply, continues to remain uncertain. The final regulations may impose additional operational and compliance costs on us and may require us to restructure certain businesses and negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.

Future Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives

Federal and state legislators as well as regulatory agencies may introduce or enact new laws and rules, or amend existing laws and rules, that may affect the regulation of financial institutions and their holding companies. The impact of any future legislative or regulatory changes cannot be predicted. However, such changes could affect Bancorp’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

190  Fifth Third Bancorp


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The risks listed below present risks that could have a material impact on the Bancorp’s financial condition, the results of its operations, or its business. Some of these risks are interrelated, and the occurrence of one or more of them may exacerbate the effect of others.

RISKS RELATING TO ECONOMIC AND MARKET CONDITIONS

Weakness in the U.S. economy, including within Fifth Third’s geographic footprint, has adversely affected Fifth Third in the past and may adversely affect Fifth Third in the future.

If the strength of the U.S. economy in general or the strength of the local economies in which Fifth Third conducts operations declines, this could result in, among other things, a decreased demand for Fifth Third’s products and services, a deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit, including a resultant effect on Fifth Third’s loan portfolio and ALLL and in the receipt of lower proceeds from the sale of loans and foreclosed properties. These factors could result in higher delinquencies, greater charge-offs and increased losses in future periods, which could materially adversely affect Fifth Third’s financial condition and results of operations.

Global financial conditions could hamper economic recovery or contribute to recessionary economic conditions and severe stress in the financial markets, including in the United States. Should the U.S. economy be adversely impacted by these factors, the likelihood for loan and asset growth at U.S. financial institutions, like Fifth Third, may deteriorate.

The global financial markets continue to be strained as a result of economic slowdowns, geopolitical concerns and the related path of commodity prices and interest rates. Divergence in economic growth in the U.S. and international economies and the resulting differences in monetary policy are placing strains on financial markets and strengthening the U.S. dollar. The relative strength of the U.S. dollar may continue to negatively impact the U.S. manufacturing sector. These factors could negatively impact the U.S. economy and affect the stability of global financial markets.

Changes in interest rates could affect Fifth Third’s income and cash flows.

Fifth Third’s income and cash flows depend to a great extent on the difference between the interest rates earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and investment securities, and the interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond Fifth Third’s control, including general economic conditions in the U.S. or abroad and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies (in particular, the FRB). Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, will influence the origination of loans, the prepayment speed of loans, the purchase of investments, the generation of deposits and the rates received on loans and investment securities and paid on deposits or other sources of funding. The impact of these changes may be magnified if Fifth Third does not effectively manage the relative sensitivity of its assets and liabilities to changes in market interest rates. Fluctuations in these areas may adversely affect Fifth Third and its shareholders.

Changes and trends in the capital markets may affect Fifth Third’s income and cash flows.

Fifth Third enters into and maintains trading and investment positions in the capital markets on its own behalf and manages investment positions on behalf of its customers. These investment positions include derivative financial instruments. The revenues and profits Fifth Third derives from managing proprietary and customer trading and investment positions are dependent on market prices. Market changes and trends may result in a decline in wealth and asset management revenue or investment or trading losses that may impact Fifth Third. Losses on behalf of its customers could expose Fifth Third to litigation, credit risks or loss of revenue from those clients and customers. Additionally, losses in Fifth Third’s trading and investment positions could lead to a loss with respect to those investments and may adversely affect Fifth Third’s income, cash flows and funding costs.

Problems encountered by financial institutions larger than or similar to Fifth Third could adversely affect financial markets generally and have direct and indirect adverse effects on Fifth Third.

Fifth Third has exposure to counterparties in the financial services industry and other industries, and routinely executes transactions with such counterparties, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds, and other institutional clients. Many of Fifth Third’s transactions with other financial institutions expose Fifth Third to credit risk in the event of default of a counterparty or client. In addition, Fifth Third’s credit risk may be affected when the collateral it holds cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure. The commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely interrelated as a result of credit, trading, clearing or other relationships between the institutions. As a result, concerns about, or a default or threatened default by, one institution could lead to significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems, losses or defaults by other institutions. This is sometimes referred to as “systemic risk” and may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, clearing houses, banks, securities firms and exchanges, with which the Bancorp interacts on a daily basis, and therefore could adversely affect Fifth Third.

Fifth Third’s stock price is volatile.

Fifth Third’s stock price has been volatile in the past and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include, without limitation:

Actual or anticipated variations in earnings;

Changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections;

Fifth Third’s announcements of developments related to its businesses;

Operating and stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers;

Actions by government regulators and changes in the regulatory regime;

New technology used or services offered by traditional andnon-traditional competitors;

News reports of trends, concerns and other issues related to the requirementsfinancial services industry;

U.S. and global economic conditions;

Natural disasters;

Geopolitical conditions such as acts or threats of Section 13terrorism, military conflicts and withdrawal from the EU by the U.K. or 15(d)other EU members.

191  Fifth Third Bancorp


The price for shares of Fifth Third’s common stock may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to Fifth Third’s performance. General market price declines or market volatility in the future could adversely affect the price for shares of Fifth Third’s common stock, and the current market price of such shares may not be indicative of future market prices.

RISKS RELATING TO FIFTH THIRD’S GENERAL BUSINESS

Changes in retail distribution strategies and consumer behavior may adversely impact Fifth Third’s investments in its bank premises and equipment and other assets and may lead to increased expenditures to change its retail distribution channel.

Fifth Third has significant investments in bank premises and equipment for its branch network including its 1,191 full-service banking centers, 50 parcels of land held for the development of future banking centers and 10 properties that are developed or in the process of being developed as branches, as well as its retail work force and other branch banking assets. Advances in technology such ase-commerce, telephone, internet and mobile banking, andin-branch self-service technologies including automatic teller machines and other equipment, as well as changing customer preferences for these other methods of accessing Fifth Third’s products and services, could affect the value of Fifth Third’s branch network or other retail distribution assets and may cause it to change its retail distribution strategy, close and/or sell certain branches or parcels of land held for development and restructure or reduce its remaining branches and work force. Further advances in technology and/or changes in customer preferences could have additional changes in Fifth Third’s retail distribution strategy and/or branch network. These actions could lead to losses on these assets or could adversely impact the carrying value of other long-lived assets and may lead to increased expenditures to renovate and reconfigure remaining branches or to otherwise reform its retail distribution channel.

Deteriorating credit quality has adversely impacted Fifth Third in the past and may adversely impact Fifth Third in the future.

When Fifth Third lends money or commits to lend money the Bancorp incurs credit risk or the risk of loss if borrowers do not repay their loans. The credit performance of the loan portfolios significantly affects the Bancorp’s financial results and condition. If the current economic environment were to deteriorate, more customers may have difficulty in repaying their loans or other obligations which could result in a higher level of credit losses and reserves for credit losses. Fifth Third reserves for credit losses by establishing reserves through a charge to earnings. The amount of these reserves is based on Fifth Third’s assessment of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio including unfunded credit commitments. The process for determining the amount of the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments is critical to Fifth Third’s financial results and condition. It requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments about the environment, including analysis of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of borrowers to repay their loans.

Fifth Third might underestimate the credit losses inherent in its loan portfolio and have credit losses in excess of the amount reserved. Fifth Third might increase the reserve because of

changing economic conditions, including falling home prices or higher unemployment, or other factors such as changes in borrower’s behavior. As an example, borrowers may “strategically default,” or discontinue making payments on their real estate-secured loans if the value of the real estate is less than what they owe, even if they are still financially able to make the payments.

Fifth Third believes that both the ALLL and the reserve for unfunded commitments are adequate to cover inherent losses at December 31, 2016; however, there is no assurance that they will be sufficient to cover future credit losses, especially if housing and employment conditions decline. In the event of significant deterioration in economic conditions, Fifth Third may be required to increase reserves in future periods, which would reduce earnings.

For more information, refer to the Credit Risk Management subsection of the Risk Management section of MD&A and the Allowance for Loan and Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Commitments subsections of the Critical Accounting Policies section of MD&A.

Fifth Third must maintain adequate sources of funding and liquidity.

Fifth Third must maintain adequate funding sources in the normal course of business to support its operations and fund outstanding liabilities, as well as meet regulatory expectations. Fifth Third primarily relies on bank deposits to be a low cost and stable source of funding for the loans Fifth Third makes and the operations of Fifth Third’s business. Core deposits, which include transaction deposits and other time deposits, have historically provided Fifth Third with a sizeable source of relatively stable andlow-cost funds (average core deposits funded 70% of average total assets at December 31, 2016). In addition to customer deposits, sources of liquidity include investments in the securities portfolio, Fifth Third’s sale or securitization of loans in secondary markets and the pledging of loans and investment securities to access secured borrowing facilities through the FHLB and the FRB, and Fifth Third’s ability to raise funds in domestic and international money and capital markets.

Fifth Third’s liquidity and ability to fund and run the business could be materially adversely affected by a variety of conditions and factors, including financial and credit market disruptions and volatility or a lack of market or customer confidence in financial markets in general similar to what occurred during the financial crisis in 2008 and early 2009, which may result in a loss of customer deposits or outflows of cash or collateral and/or ability to access capital markets on favorable terms.

Other conditions and factors that could materially adversely affect Fifth Third’s liquidity and funding include:

a lack of market or customer confidence in Fifth Third or negative news about Fifth Third or the financial services industry generally, which also may result in a loss of deposits and/or negatively affect the ability to access the capital markets;

the loss of customer deposits to alternative investments;

inability to sell or securitize loans or other assets,

increased regulatory requirements,

and reductions in one or more of Fifth Third’s credit ratings.

192  Fifth Third Bancorp


A reduced credit rating could adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to borrow funds and raise the cost of borrowings substantially and could cause creditors and business counterparties to raise collateral requirements or take other actions that could adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to raise capital. Many of the above conditions and factors may be caused by events over which Fifth Third has little or no control such as what occurred during the financial crisis. While market conditions have stabilized and, in many cases, improved, there can be no assurance that significant disruption and volatility in the financial markets will not occur in the future.

Recent regulatory changes relating to liquidity and risk management may also negatively impact Fifth Third’s results of operations and competitive position. Various regulations recently adopted or proposed, and additional regulations under consideration, impose or could impose more stringent liquidity requirements for large financial institutions, including Fifth Third. These regulations address, among other matters, liquidity stress testing, minimum liquidity requirements and restrictions on short-term debt issued bytop-tier holding companies. Given the overlap and complex interactions of these regulations with other regulatory changes, including the resolution and recovery framework applicable to Fifth Third, the full impact of the adopted and proposed regulations will remain uncertain until their full implementation. It is also uncertain whether adopted and proposed regulations will ultimately be rolled back or modified as a result of the change in administration in the U.S. Uncertainty about the timing and scope of any such changes as well as the cost of complying with a new regulatory regime may negatively impact Fifth Third’s business.

If Fifth Third is unable to continue to fund assets through customer bank deposits or access capital markets on favorable terms or if Fifth Third suffers an increase in borrowing costs or otherwise fails to manage liquidity effectively, then Fifth Third’s liquidity, operating margins, and financial results and condition may be materially adversely affected. As Fifth Third did during the financial crisis, it may also need to raise additional capital through the issuance of stock, which could dilute the ownership of existing stockholders, or reduce or even eliminate common stock dividends to preserve capital.

Fifth Third may have more credit risk and higher credit losses to the extent loans are concentrated by location or industry of the borrowers or collateral.

Fifth Third’s credit risk and credit losses can increase if its loans are concentrated to borrowers engaged in the same or similar activities or to borrowers who as a group may be uniquely or disproportionately affected by economic or market conditions. Deterioration in economic conditions, housing conditions and commodity and real estate values in certain states or locations could result in materially higher credit losses if loans are concentrated in those locations. Fifth Third has significant exposures to businesses in certain economic sectors such as manufacturing, real estate, financial services and insurance and weaknesses in those businesses may adversely impact Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally Fifth Third has a substantial portfolio of commercial and residential real estate loans and weaknesses in residential or commercial real estate markets may adversely impact Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or financial condition.

Fifth Third may be required to repurchase residential mortgage loans or reimburse investors and others as a result of breaches in contractual representations and warranties.

Fifth Third sells residential mortgage loans to various parties, including GSEs and other financial institutions that purchase residential mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. Fifth Third may be required to repurchase residential mortgage loans, indemnify the securitization trust, investor or insurer, or reimburse the securitization trust, investor or insurer for credit losses incurred on loans in the event of a breach of contractual representations or warranties that is not remedied within a specified period (usually 60 days or less) after Fifth Third receives notice of the breach. Contracts for residential mortgage loan sales to the GSEs include various types of specific remedies and penalties that could be applied to inadequate responses to repurchase requests. If economic conditions and the housing market deteriorate or future investor repurchase demand and Fifth Third’s success at appealing repurchase requests differ from past experience, Fifth Third could have increased repurchase obligations and increased loss severity on repurchases, requiring material additions to the repurchase reserve.

If Fifth Third does not respond to rapid changes in the financial services industry or otherwise adapt to changing customer preferences, its financial performance may suffer.

Fifth Third’s ability to deliver strong financial performance and returns on investment to shareholders will depend in part on its ability to expand the scope of available financial services to meet the needs and demands of its customers. In addition to the challenge of competing against other banks in attracting and retaining customers for traditional banking services, Fifth Third’s competitors also include securities dealers, brokers, mortgage bankers, investment advisors, and specialty finance, telecommunications, technology and insurance companies who seek to offerone-stop financial services that may include services that banks have not been able or allowed to offer to their customers in the past or may not be currently able or allowed to offer.

This increasingly competitive environment is primarily a result of changes in regulation, changes in technology and product delivery systems, as well as the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. Rapidly changing technology and consumer preferences may require Fifth Third to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services in order to compete and meet customer demands. Fifth Third may not be able to do so or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. As a result, Fifth Third’s ability to effectively compete to retain or acquire new business may be impaired, and its business, financial condition or results of operations, may be adversely affected.

Fifth Third may make strategic investments and may expand an existing line of business or enter into new lines of business to remain competitive. If Fifth Third’s chosen strategies, for example, the NorthStar Strategy initiatives, are not appropriate to effectively compete or Fifth Third does not execute them in an appropriate or timely manner, Fifth Third’s business and results may suffer. Additionally, these strategies, products and lines of business may bring with them unforeseeable or unforeseen risks and may not generate the expected results or returns, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s results of operations or future growth prospects and cause Fifth Third to fail to meet its stated goals and expectations.

193  Fifth Third Bancorp


Fifth Third may not be able to successfully implement future information technology system enhancements, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s business operations and profitability.

Fifth Third invests significant resources in information technology system enhancements in order to provide functionality and security at an appropriate level. Fifth Third may not be able to successfully implement and integrate future system enhancements, which could adversely impact the ability to provide timely and accurate financial information in compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, which could result in sanctions from regulatory authorities. Such sanctions could include fines and result in reputational harm and have other negative effects. In addition, future system enhancements could have higher than expected costs and/or result in operating inefficiencies, which could increase the costs associated with the implementation as well as ongoing operations. Failure to properly utilize system enhancements that are implemented in the future could result in impairment charges that adversely impact Fifth Third’s financial condition and results of operations and could result in significant costs to remediate or replace the defective components. In addition, Fifth Third may incur significant training, licensing, maintenance, consulting and amortization expenses during and after systems implementations, and any such costs may continue for an extended period of time.

If Fifth Third is unable to grow its deposits, it may be subject to paying higher funding costs.

The total amount that Fifth Third pays for funding costs is dependent, in part, on Fifth Third’s ability to grow its deposits. If Fifth Third is unable to sufficiently grow its deposits to meet liquidity objectives, it may be subject to paying higher funding costs. Fifth Third competes with banks and other financial services companies for deposits. If competitors raise the rates they pay on deposits, Fifth Third’s funding costs may increase, either because Fifth Third raises rates to avoid losing deposits or because Fifth Third loses deposits and must rely on more expensive sources of funding. Higher funding costs reduce Fifth Third’s net interest margin and net interest income. Fifth Third’s bank customers could take their money out of the Bank and put it in alternative investments, causing Fifth Third to lose a lower cost source of funding. Checking and savings account balances and other forms of customer deposits may decrease when customers perceive alternative investments, such as the stock market, as providing a better risk/return tradeoff.

The Bancorp’s ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries accounts for most of its revenue and could affect its liquidity and ability to pay dividends.

Fifth Third Bancorp is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. Fifth Third Bancorp typically receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on Fifth Third Bancorp’s stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and/or state laws and regulations, as well as regulatory expectations, limit the amount of dividends that the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary and certain nonbank subsidiaries may pay. Regulatory scrutiny of capital levels at bank holding companies and insured depository institution subsidiaries has increased since the financial crisis and has resulted in increased regulatory focus on all aspects of capital planning, including dividends and other distributions to shareholders of banks such as the parent bank

holding companies. Also, Fifth Third Bancorp’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of that subsidiary’s creditors. Limitations on the Bancorp’s ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity and ability to pay dividends on stock or interest and principal on its debt. For further information refer to Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The financial services industry is highly competitive and creates competitive pressures that could adversely affect Fifth Third’s revenue and profitability.

The financial services industry in which Fifth Third operates is highly competitive. Fifth Third competes not only with commercial banks, but also with insurance companies, mutual funds, hedge funds, telecommunications and technology and other companies offering financial services in the U.S., globally and over the internet. Fifth Third competes on the basis of several factors, including capital, access to capital, revenue generation, products, services, transaction execution, innovation, reputation and price. Over time, certain sectors of the financial services industry have become more concentrated, as institutions involved in a broad range of financial services have been acquired by or merged into other firms. These developments could result in Fifth Third’s competitors gaining greater capital and other resources, such as a broader range of products and services and geographic diversity. Fifth Third may experience pricing pressures as a result of these factors and as some of its competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices.

Fifth Third and/or the holders of its securities could be adversely affected by unfavorable ratings from rating agencies.

Fifth Third’s ability to access the capital markets is important to its overall funding profile. This access is affected by the ratings assigned by rating agencies to Fifth Third, certain of its subsidiaries and particular classes of securities they issue. The interest rates that Fifth Third pays on its securities are also influenced by, among other things, the credit ratings that it, its subsidiaries and/or its securities receive from recognized rating agencies. A downgrade to Fifth Third or its subsidiaries’ credit rating could affect its ability to access the capital markets, increase its borrowing costs and negatively impact its profitability. A ratings downgrade to Fifth Third, its subsidiaries or their securities could also create obligations or liabilities of Fifth Third under the terms of its outstanding securities that could increase Fifth Third’s costs or otherwise have a negative effect on its results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, a downgrade of the credit rating of any particular security issued by Fifth Third or its subsidiaries could negatively affect the ability of the holders of that security to sell the securities and the prices at which any such securities may be sold.

Fifth Third could suffer if it fails to attract and retain skilled personnel.

Fifth Third’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key individuals. Competition for qualified candidates in the activities and markets that Fifth Third serves is intense, which may increase Fifth Third’s expenses and may result in Fifth Third not being able to hire candidates or retain them. If Fifth Third is not able to hire qualified candidates or retain its key personnel, Fifth Third may be unable to execute its business strategies and may suffer adverse consequences to its business, operations and financial condition.

194  Fifth Third Bancorp


Compensation paid by financial institutions such as Fifth Third has become increasingly regulated, particularly under the DFA, which regulation affects the amount and form of compensation Fifth Third pays to hire and retain talented employees. If Fifth Third is unable to attract and retain qualified employees, or do so at rates necessary to maintain its competitive position, or if compensation costs required to attract and retain employees become more expensive, Fifth Third’s performance, including its competitive position, could be materially adversely affected.

Fifth Third’s mortgage banking revenue can be volatile from quarter to quarter.

Fifth Third earns revenue from the fees it receives for originating mortgage loans and for servicing mortgage loans. When rates rise, the demand for mortgage loans tends to fall, reducing the revenue Fifth Third receives from loan originations. At the same time, revenue from MSRs can increase through increases in fair value. When rates fall, mortgage originations tend to increase and the value of MSRs tends to decline, also with some offsetting revenue effect. Even though the origination of mortgage loans can act as a “natural hedge,” the hedge is not perfect, either in amount or timing. For example, the negative effect on revenue from a decrease in the fair value of residential MSRs is immediate, but any offsetting revenue benefit from more originations and the MSRs relating to the new loans would accrue over time. It is also possible that even if interest rates were to fall, mortgage originations may also fall or any increase in mortgage originations may not be enough to offset the decrease in the MSRs value caused by the lower rates.

Fifth Third typically uses derivatives and other instruments to hedge its mortgage banking interest rate risk. Fifth Third generally does not hedge all of its risks, and the fact that Fifth Third attempts to hedge any of the risks does not mean Fifth Third will be successful. Hedging is a complex process, requiring sophisticated models and constant monitoring. Fifth Third may use hedging instruments tied to U.S. Treasury rates, LIBOR or Eurodollars that may not perfectly correlate with the value or income being hedged. Fifth Third could incur significant losses from its hedging activities. There may be periods where Fifth Third elects not to use derivatives and other instruments to hedge mortgage banking interest rate risk.

Fifth Third uses models for business planning purposes that may not adequately predict future results.

Fifth Third uses financial models to aid in its planning for various purposes including its capital and liquidity needs and other purposes. The models used may not accurately account for all variables and may fail to predict outcomes accurately and/or may overstate or understate certain effects. As a result of these potential failures, Fifth Third may not adequately prepare for future events and may suffer losses or other setbacks due to these failures.

Also, information Fifth Third provides to the public or to its regulators based on models could be inaccurate or misleading due to inadequate design or implementation, for example. Decisions that its regulators make, including those related to capital distributions to its shareholders, could be affected adversely due to the perception that the models used to generate the relevant information are unreliable or inadequate.

Changes in interest rates could also reduce the value of MSRs.

Fifth Third acquires MSRs when it keeps the servicing rights after the sale or securitization of the loans that have been originated or when it purchases the servicing rights to mortgage loans originated by other lenders. Fifth Third initially measures all residential MSRs at fair value and subsequently amortizes the MSRs in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. Fair value is the present value of estimated future net servicing income, calculated based on a number of variables, including assumptions about the likelihood of prepayment by borrowers. Servicing rights are assessed for impairment monthly, based on fair value, with temporary impairment recognized through a valuation allowance and other-than-temporary impairment recognized through awrite-off of the servicing asset and related valuation allowance.

Changes in interest rates can affect prepayment assumptions and thus fair value. When interest rates fall, borrowers are usually more likely to prepay their mortgage loans by refinancing them at a lower rate. As the likelihood of prepayment increases, the fair value of MSRs can decrease. Each quarter Fifth Third evaluates the fair value of MSRs, and decreases in fair value of MSRs below amortized cost reduce earnings in the period in which the decrease occurs.

The preparation of financial statements requires Fifth Third to make subjective determinations and use estimates that may vary from actual results and materially impact its results of operations or financial position.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make significant estimates that affect the financial statements. If new information arises that results in a material change to a reserve amount, such a change could result in a change to previously announced financial results. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies section of MD&A for more information regarding management’s significant estimates.

Changes in accounting standards or interpretations could impact Fifth Third’s reported earnings and financial condition.

The accounting standard setters, including the FASB, the SEC and other regulatory agencies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of Fifth Third’s consolidated financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how Fifth Third records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, Fifth Third could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, which would result in the recasting of Fifth Third’s prior period financial statements.

Future acquisitions may dilute current shareholders’ ownership of Fifth Third and may cause Fifth Third to become more susceptible to adverse economic events.

Future business acquisitions could be material to Fifth Third and it may issue additional shares of stock to pay for those acquisitions, which would dilute current shareholders’ ownership interests. Acquisitions also could require Fifth Third to use substantial cash or other liquid assets or to incur debt. In those events, Fifth Third could become more susceptible to economic downturns and competitive pressures.

195  Fifth Third Bancorp


Difficulties in identifying suitable opportunities or combining the operations of acquired entities or assets with Fifth Third’s own operations or assessing the effectiveness of businesses in which we make strategic investments or with which we enter into strategic contractual relationships may prevent Fifth Third from achieving the expected benefits from these acquisitions, investments or relationships.

Inherent uncertainties exist when assessing or integrating the operations of an acquired business or investment or relationship opportunity. Fifth Third may not be able to fully achieve its strategic objectives and planned operating efficiencies in an acquisition or strategic relationship. In addition, the markets and industries in which Fifth Third and its potential acquisition and investment targets operate are highly competitive. Acquisition or investment targets may lose customers or otherwise perform poorly or unprofitably, in the case of an acquired business or strategic relationship, cause Fifth Third to lose customers or perform poorly or unprofitably. Future acquisition and integration activities and efforts to monitor new investments or reap the benefits of a new strategic relationship may require Fifth Third to devote substantial time and resources and may cause these acquisitions, investments and relationships to be unprofitable or cause Fifth Third to be unable to pursue other business opportunities.

After completing an acquisition, Fifth Third may find certain items were not accounted for properly in accordance with financial accounting and reporting standards. Fifth Third may also not realize the expected benefits of the acquisition due to lower financial results pertaining to the acquired entity or assets. For example, Fifth Third could experience higher charge-offs than originally anticipated related to the acquired loan portfolio. Additionally, acquired companies or businesses may increase Fifth Third’s risk of regulatory action or restrictions related to the operations of the acquired business.

Fifth Third may sell or consider selling one or more of its businesses. Should it determine to sell such a business, it may not be able to generate gains on sale or related increase in shareholders’ equity commensurate with desirable levels. Moreover, if Fifth Third sold such businesses, the loss of income could have an adverse effect on its earnings and future growth.

Fifth Third owns, or owns a minority stake in, as applicable, severalnon-strategic businesses and other assets that are not significantly synergistic with its core financial services businesses or may no longer be aligned with Fifth Third’s strategic plans. Fifth Third has, from time to time, considered and undertaken (and, in the case of Vantiv, has announced its intention to continue) the sale of such businesses and/or interests, including, for example, portions of Fifth Third’s stake in Vantiv Holding, LLC. If it were to determine to sell such businesses and/or interests, Fifth Third would be subject to market forces that may make completion of a sale unsuccessful or may not be able to do so within a desirable time frame. If Fifth Third were to complete the sale of any of its businesses and/or interests in third parties, it would lose the income from the sold businesses and/or interests, including those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, and such loss of income could have an adverse effect on its future earnings and growth. Additionally, Fifth Third may encounter difficulties in separating the operations of any businesses it sells, which may affect its business or results of operations.

Fifth Third relies on its systems and certain third party service providers, and certain failures could materially adversely affect operations.

Fifth Third collects, processes and stores sensitive consumer data by utilizing computer systems and telecommunications networks operated by both Fifth Third and third party service providers. Fifth Third has security, backup and recovery systems in place, as well as a business continuity plan to ensure the systems will not be inoperable. Fifth Third also has security to prevent unauthorized access to the systems. In addition, Fifth Third requires its third party service providers to maintain similar controls. However, Fifth Third cannot be certain that the measures will be successful. A security breach in the systems and loss of confidential information such as credit card numbers and related information could result in significant reputational harm and the loss of customers’ confidence in Fifth Third. As a result, we may lose existing and new customers and incur significant costs, including privacy monitoring activities.

Fifth Third’s necessary dependence upon automated systems to record and process its transaction volume poses the risk that technical system flaws or employee errors, tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses and may be difficult to detect. Fifth Third may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are beyond its control (for example, computer viruses or electrical or telecommunications outages).

Third parties with which the Bancorp does business, as well as retailers and other third parties with which the Bancorp’s customers do business, can also be sources of operational risk to the Bancorp, particularly where activities of customers are beyond the Bancorp’s security and control systems, such as through the use of the internet, personal computers, tablets, smart phones and other mobile services. Security breaches affecting the Bancorp’s customers, or systems breakdowns or failures, security breaches or employee misconduct affecting such other third parties, may require the Bancorp to take steps to protect the integrity of its own operational systems or to safeguard confidential information of the Bancorp or its customers, thereby increasing the Bancorp’s operational costs and potentially diminishing customer satisfaction. If personal, confidential or proprietary information of customers or clients in the Bancorp’s possession were to be mishandled or misused, the Bancorp could suffer significant regulatory consequences, reputational damage and financial loss. Such mishandling or misuse could include circumstances where, for example, such information was erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, either through the fault of the Bancorp’s systems, employees or counterparties, or where such information was intercepted or otherwise compromised by third parties. The Bancorp may be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond the Bancorp’s control, which may include, for example, security breaches; electrical or telecommunications outages; failures of computer servers or other damage to the Bancorp’s property or assets; natural disasters or severe weather conditions; health emergencies; or events arising from local or larger-scale political events, including outbreaks of hostilities or terrorist acts. While the Bancorp believes that its current resiliency plans are both sufficient and adequate, there can be no assurance that such plans will fully mitigate all potential business continuity risks to the Bancorp or its customers and clients.

196  Fifth Third Bancorp


Any failures or disruptions of the Bancorp’s systems or operations could give rise to losses in service to customers and clients, adversely affect the Bancorp’s business and results of operations by subjecting the Bancorp to losses or liability, or require the Bancorp to expend significant resources to correct the failure or disruption, as well as by exposing the Bancorp to reputational harm, litigation, regulatory fines or penalties or losses not covered by insurance.

Fifth Third is exposed to cyber-security risks, including denial of service, hacking, and identity theft, which could result in the disclosure, theft or destruction of confidential information.

Fifth Third relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in disruptions to its accounting, deposit, loan and other systems, and adversely affect its customer relationships. While Fifth Third has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of these possible events, there can be no assurance that any such failure, interruption or security breach will not occur or, if any does occur, that it can be sufficiently remediated. There have been increasing efforts on the part of third parties, including through cyber-attacks, to breach data security at financial institutions or with respect to financial transactions. There have been several recent instances involving financial services and consumer-based companies reporting the unauthorized disclosure of client or customer information or the destruction or theft of corporate data, by both private individuals and foreign governments. In addition, because the techniques used to cause such security breaches change frequently, often are not recognized until launched against a target and may originate from less regulated and remote areas around the world, Fifth Third may be unable to proactively address these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Furthermore, there has been a well-publicized series of apparently related distributed denial of service attacks on large financial services companies, including Fifth Third Bank, and “ransom” attacks where hackers have requested payments in exchange for not disclosing customer information. Distributed denial of service attacks are designed to saturate the targeted online network with excessive amounts of network traffic, resulting in slow response times, or in some cases, causing the site to be temporarily unavailable. These events adversely affected the performance of Fifth Third’s website and in some instances prevented customers from accessing Fifth Third’s website. Future cyber-attacks could be more disruptive and damaging. Cyber threats are rapidly evolving and Fifth Third may not be able to anticipate or prevent all such attacks. Fifth Third may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize these risks or in the investigation of such cyber-attacks or related to the protection of the Bancorp’s customers from identity theft as a result of such attacks. Despite this effort, the occurrence of any failure, interruption or security breach of Fifth Third’s systems or third-party service providers, particularly if widespread or resulting in financial losses to customers, could also seriously damage Fifth Third’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject it to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose it to civil litigation and financial liability.

Fifth Third is exposed to operational and reputational risk.

Fifth Third is exposed to many types of operational risk, including but not limited to, business continuity risk, information management risk, fraud risk, model risk, third party service provider risk, human resources risk, and process risk.

Fifth Third’s actual or alleged conduct in activities, such as lending practices, data security, corporate governance and acquisitions, may result in negative public opinion and may damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Actions taken by government regulators and community

organizations may also damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Additionally, whereas negative public opinion once was primarily driven by adverse news coverage in traditional media, the advent and expansion of social media facilitates the rapid dissemination of information. Though Fifth Third monitors social media channels, the potential remains for rapid and widespread dissemination of inaccurate, misleading or false information that could damage Fifth Third’s reputation. Negative public opinion can adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to attract and keep customers and can increase the risk that it will be a target of litigation and regulatory action.

Fifth Third’s framework for managing risks may not be effective in mitigating its risk and loss.

Fifth Third’s risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and loss. Fifth Third has established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor, report, and analyze the types of risk to which it is subject, including liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, interest rate risk, compliance risk, strategic risk, reputational risk, and operational risk related to its employees, systems and vendors, among others. Any system of control and any system to reduce risk exposure, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. A failure in Fifth Third’s internal controls could have a significant negative impact not only on its earnings, but also on the perception that customers, regulators and investors may have of Fifth Third. Fifth Third continues to devote a significant amount of effort, time and resources to improving its controls and ensuring compliance with complex regulations.

Additionally, instruments, systems and strategies used to hedge or otherwise manage exposure to various types of market compliance, credit, liquidity, operational and business risks and enterprise-wide risk could be less effective than anticipated. As a result, Fifth Third may not be able to effectively mitigate its risk exposures in particular market environments or against particular types of risk. If Fifth Third’s risk management framework proves ineffective, Fifth Third could incur litigation, negative regulatory consequences, reputational damages among other adverse consequences and Fifth Third could suffer unexpected losses that may affect its financial condition or results of operations.

The results of Vantiv Holding, LLC could have a negative impact on Fifth Third’s operating results and financial condition.

In 2009, Fifth Third sold an approximate 51% interest in its processing business, Vantiv Holding, LLC (formerly Fifth Third Processing Solutions). As a result of additional share sales completed by Fifth Third in 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, the Bancorp ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC as of December 31, 2016, is approximately 18%. The Bancorp’s investment in Vantiv Holding, LLC is currently accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is not consolidated based on Fifth Third’s remaining ownership share in Vantiv Holding, LLC. Vantiv Holding, LLC’s operating results could be poor and could negatively affect the operating results of Fifth Third. In addition, Fifth Third participates in a multi-lender credit facility to Vantiv Holding, LLC and repayment of these loans is contingent on the future cash flows of Vantiv Holding, LLC, which are subject to their own risks and uncertainties.

197  Fifth Third Bancorp


Changes in Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv Holding, LLC could have an impact on Fifth Third’s stock price, operating results, financial condition, and future outlook.

Fifth Third expects that it will reduce its equity investments in Vantiv Holding, LLC and its publicly traded parent, Vantiv, Inc., in whole or in part, but there can be no assurance that such sales will occur or as to when they will occur or the value that might be received by Fifth Third. A reduction in Fifth Third’s Vantiv ownership interest may result from a series of sale transactions similar to transactions in Vantiv securities engaged in by Fifth Third to date, or could occur as a result of one or more larger transactions, depending on strategic considerations, market conditions, or other factors deemed important by Fifth Third. Additionally, Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv could be affected by transactions that Vantiv may undertake. The nature, terms, and timing of transactions engaged in by Vantiv may not be entirely within Fifth Third’s control, if at all. If and when Fifth Third’s ownership in Vantiv is reduced, such changes in ownership could have a material impact, positive or negative, on Fifth Third’s stock price, operating results, financial condition and future outlook.

Weather related events or other natural disasters may have an effect on the performance of Fifth Third’s loan portfolios, especially in its coastal markets, thereby adversely impacting its results of operations.

Fifth Third’s footprint stretches from the upper Midwestern to lower Southeastern regions of the United States. These regions have experienced weather events including hurricanes and other natural disasters. The nature and level of these events and the impact of global climate change upon their frequency and severity cannot be predicted. If large scale events occur, they may significantly impact its loan portfolios by damaging properties pledged as collateral as well as impairing its borrowers’ ability to repay their loans.

RISKS RELATED TO THE LEGAL AND REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

As a regulated entity, the Bancorp is subject to certain capital requirements that may limit its operations and potential growth.

The Bancorp is a bank holding company and a financial holding company. As such, it is subject to the comprehensive, consolidated supervision and regulation of the FRB, including risk-based and leverage capital requirements, investment practices, dividend policy and growth. The Bancorp must maintain certain risk-based and leverage capital ratios as required by the FRB which can change depending upon general economic conditions and the Bancorp’s particular condition, risk profile and growth plans. Compliance with the capital requirements, including leverage ratios, may limit operations that require the intensive use of capital and could adversely affect the Bancorp’s ability to expand or maintain present business levels.

U.S. federal banking agencies’ capital rules implementing Basel III became effective for the Bancorp on January 1, 2015, subject tophase-in periods for certain components and other provisions. The need to maintain more and higher quality capital as well as greater liquidity could limit Fifth Third’s business activities, including lending, and the ability to expand, either organically or through acquisitions. Moreover, although the capital requirements are being phased in over time, U.S. federal banking agencies take into account expectations regarding the ability of banks to meet the capital requirements, including under stressed conditions, in approving actions that represent uses of capital, such as dividend increases and share repurchases.

Failure by the Bancorp’s banking subsidiary to meet applicable capital requirements could subject the Bank to a variety of enforcement remedies available to the federal regulatory authorities. These include limitations on the ability to pay dividends, the issuance by the regulatory authority of a capital directive to increase capital, and the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC.

Fifth Third’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected by new or changed regulations and by the manner in which such regulations are applied by regulatory authorities.

Previous economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial services industry. The U.S. government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by introducing various actions and passing legislation such as the DFA. Such programs and legislation subject Fifth Third and other financial institutions to restrictions, oversight and/or costs that may have an impact on Fifth Third’s business, financial condition, results of operations or the price of its common stock.

Although there is uncertainty regarding whether the programs implemented and the legislation passed following the financial crisis will remain in place or be modified or repealed under the new administration in the U.S., any new proposals for legislation and regulations introduced could further substantially increase compliance costs in the financial services industry. In addition, changes to laws and regulations could have a negatively impact in the short term even if the longer-term impact of those changes may be expected to be positive for Fifth Third. Fifth Third cannot predict whether any pending or future legislation will be adopted or the substance and impact of any such new legislation on Fifth Third. Changes in regulation could affect Fifth Third in a substantial way and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fifth Third is subject to various regulatory requirements that may limit its operations and potential growth.

Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions and their holding companies, the FRB, the FDIC, the CFPB and the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions have the authority to compel or restrict certain actions by Fifth Third and its banking subsidiary, Fifth Third Bank. Fifth Third and its banking subsidiary are subject to such supervisory authority and, more generally, must, in certain instances, obtain prior regulatory approval before engaging in certain activities or corporate decisions. There can be no assurance that such approvals, if required, would be forthcoming or that such approvals would be granted in a timely manner. Failure to receive any such approval, if required, could limit or impair Fifth Third’s operations, restrict its growth and/or affect its dividend policy. Such actions and activities subject to prior approval include, but are not limited to, increasing dividends paid by Fifth Third or its banking subsidiary, entering into a merger or acquisition transaction, acquiring or establishing new branches, and entering into certain new businesses.

198  Fifth Third Bancorp


The Bancorp is a bank holding company and a financial holding company. Failure by the Bancorp or Fifth Third Bank to meet the applicable eligibility requirements for financial holding company status (including capital and management requirements and that Fifth Third Bank maintain at least a “Satisfactory” CRA rating) may result in restrictions on certain activities of the Bancorp, including the commencement of new activities and mergers with or acquisitions of other financial institutions, and could ultimately result in the loss of financial holding company status.

In the wake of the most recent global financial crisis, Fifth Third and other financial institutions more generally have been subjected to increased scrutiny from government authorities, including bank regulatory authorities, stemming from broader systemic regulatory concerns, including with respect to stress testing, capital levels, asset quality, provisioning, AML/BSA, consumer compliance and other prudential matters and efforts to ensure that financial institutions take steps to improve their risk management and prevent future crises.

In this regard, government authorities, including the bank regulatory agencies, are also pursuing aggressive enforcement actions with respect to compliance and other legal matters involving financial activities, which heightens the risks associated with actual and perceived compliance failures and may also adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to enter into certain transactions or engage in certain activities, or obtain necessary regulatory approvals in connection therewith.

In some cases, regulatory agencies may take supervisory actions that may not be publicly disclosed, which restrict or limit a financial institution. Finally, as part of Fifth Third’s regular examination process, Fifth Third’s and its banking subsidiary’s respective regulators may advise it and its banking subsidiary to operate under various restrictions as a prudential matter. Such supervisory actions or restrictions, if and in whatever manner imposed, could negatively affect Fifth Third’s ability to engage in new activities and certain transactions, as well as have a material adverse effect on Fifth Third’s business and results of operations and may not be publicly disclosed.

In July 2016, the FRB announced that Fifth Third Bank received a rating of “Needs to Improve” on its CRA examination for the period covering 2011-2013 following its periodic examination to determine Fifth Third Bank’s compliance with the CRA from 2011 through 2013. While Fifth Third Bank’s CRA rating is “Needs to Improve” the Bancorp and Fifth Third Bank face limitations and conditions on certain activities (including the commencement of new activities and merger with or acquisitions of other financial institutions) and the potential loss of financial holding company status. As a result of these limitations and conditions, Fifth Third may be unable or may fail to pursue, evaluate or complete transactions that might have been strategically or competitively significant. The Bank’s next CRA examination commenced during the fourth quarter of 2016.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, investigations and proceedings by various governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, as well as self-regulatory agencies which may lead to adverse consequences.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become involved from time to time in information-gathering requests, reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental regulatory agencies and law enforcement authorities, as well as self-regulatory agencies, regarding their respective customers and businesses. In addition, the complexity of the federal and state

regulatory and enforcement regimes in the U.S. means that a single event or topic may give rise to numerous and overlapping investigations and regulatory proceedings. Such matters may result in material adverse consequences, including without limitation, adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other actions, amendments and/or restatements of Fifth Third’s SEC filings and/or financial statements, as applicable, and/or determinations of material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures.

There has been a trend of large settlements with governmental agencies that may adversely affect the outcomes for other financial institutions, to the extent they are used as a template for other settlements in the future. The uncertain regulatory enforcement environment makes it difficult to estimate probable losses, which can lead to substantial disparities between legal reserves and actual settlements or penalties.

Deposit insurance premiums levied against Fifth Third Bank may increase if the number of bank failures increase or the cost of resolving failed banks increases.

The FDIC maintains a DIF to protect insured depositors in the event of bank failures. The DIF is funded by fees assessed on insured depository institutions including Fifth Third Bank. Future deposit premiums paid by Fifth Third Bank depend on FDIC rules, which are subject to change, the level of the DIF and the magnitude and cost of future bank failures. Fifth Third Bank may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums if market developments change such that the DIF balance is reduced or the FDIC changes its rules to require higher premiums.

Fifth Third is subject to extensive governmental regulation which could adversely impact Fifth Third or the businesses in which Fifth Third is engaged.

Fifth Third is subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost all aspects of its operations and limit the businesses in which Fifth Third may engage. These laws and regulations may change from time to time and are primarily intended for the protection of consumers and depositors and are not designed to protect security-holders. The impact of any changes to laws and regulations or other actions by regulatory agencies may negatively impact Fifth Third or its ability to increase the value of its business. Additionally, actions by regulatory agencies or significant litigation against Fifth Third could cause it to devote significant time and resources to defending itself and may lead to penalties that materially affect Fifth Third and its shareholders. Future changes in the laws, including tax laws, or regulations or their interpretations or enforcement may also be materially adverse to Fifth Third and its shareholders or may require Fifth Third to expend significant time and resources to comply with such requirements.

The DFA, enacted in 2010, is complex and broad in scope and several of its provisions are still being implemented. The DFA established the CFPB which has authority to regulate consumer financial products and services sold by banks andnon-bank companies and to supervise banks with assets of more than $10 billion and their affiliates for compliance with Federal consumer protection laws. Since its formation, the CFPB has finalized a number of significant rules that could have a significant impact on Fifth Third’s business and the financial services industry more generally including integrated mortgage disclosures under the Truth in Lending Act and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.

199  Fifth Third Bancorp


Compliance with the rules and policies adopted by the CFPB may limit the products Fifth Third may permissibly offer to customers, or limit the terms on which those products may be issued, or may adversely affect Fifth Third’s ability to conduct its business as previously conducted. Fifth Third may also be required to add additional compliance personnel or incur other significant compliance-related expenses. Fifth Third’s business, results of operations or competitive position may be adversely affected as a result.

The reforms, both under the DFA and otherwise, are having a significant effect on the entire financial industry. Fifth Third believes compliance with the DFA and implementing its regulations and other initiatives will likely continue to negatively impact revenue and increase the cost of doing business, both in terms of transition expenses and on an ongoing basis, and may also limit Fifth Third’s ability to pursue certain desirable business opportunities. Any new regulatory requirements or changes to existing requirements could require changes to Fifth Third’s businesses, result in increased compliance costs and affect the profitability of such businesses. Additionally, reform could affect the behaviors of third parties that Fifth Third deals with in the course of business, such as rating agencies, insurance companies and investors. The extent to which Fifth Third can adjust its strategies to offset such adverse impacts also is not known at this time.

We may become subject to more stringent regulatory requirements and activity restrictions if the FRB and FDIC determine that Fifth Third’s resolution plan is not credible.

The DFA and implementing regulations jointly issued by the FRB and FDIC require bank holding companies with more than $50 billion in assets to annually submit a resolution plan to the FRB and the FDIC that, in the event of material financial distress or failure, establish the rapid, orderly resolution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. If the FRB and the FDIC jointly determine that Fifth Third’s resolution plan is not “credible,” Fifth Third could become subjected to more stringent capital, leverage or liquidity requirements or restrictions, or restrictions on Fifth Third’s growth, activities or operations, and could eventually be required to divest certain assets or operations in ways that could negatively impact its operations and strategy.

Conforming Covered Activities to the Volcker Rule may require the expenditure of resources and management attention and result in forced sales of assets.

Among other restricted activities, the DFA “Volcker Rule” generally restricts banks and their affiliates from sponsoring or retaining an interest in certain private equity and hedge funds. A forced sale of some or all (“Legacy Covered Funds”) could result in Fifth Third receiving less value than it would otherwise have received.

If an orderly liquidation of a systemically important bank holding company ornon-bank financial company were triggered, Fifth Third could face assessments for the Orderly Liquidation Fund.

The DFA created authority for the orderly liquidation of systemically important bank holding companies andnon-bank financial companies and is based on the FDIC’s bank resolution model. The Secretary of the U.S. Treasury may trigger liquidation under this authority only after consultation with the President of the United States and after receiving a recommendation from the

boards of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve upon atwo-thirds vote. Liquidation proceedings will be funded by the Orderly Liquidation Fund established under the DFA, which will borrow from the U.S. Treasury and impose risk-based assessments on covered financial companies. Risk-based assessments would be made, first, on entities that received more in the resolution than they would have received in the liquidation to the extent of such excess, and second, if necessary, on, among others, bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, such as Fifth Third. Any such assessments may adversely affect Fifth Third’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Regulation of Fifth Third by the CFTC imposes additional operational and compliance costs.

Title VII of DFA imposes a new regulatory regime on the U.S. derivatives markets. While most of the provisions related to derivatives markets are now in effect, several additional requirements await final regulations from the relevant regulatory agencies for derivatives, the CFTC and the SEC. One aspect of this new regulatory regime for derivatives is that substantial oversight responsibility has been provided to the CFTC, which, as a result, now has a meaningful supervisory role with respect to some of Fifth Third’s businesses. In 2014, Fifth Third Bank provisionally registered as a swap dealer with the CFTC and became subject to new substantive requirements, including real time trade reporting and robust record keeping requirements, business conduct requirements (including daily valuations, disclosure of material risks associated with swaps and disclosure of material incentives and conflicts of interest), and mandatory clearing and exchange trading of all standardized swaps designated by the relevant regulatory agencies as required to be cleared. Although the ultimate impact will depend on the promulgation of all final regulations, Fifth Third‘s derivatives activity will be subject to FRB margin requirements and may also be subject to capital requirements specific to this derivatives activity. These requirements will collectively impose implementation and ongoing compliance burdens on Fifth Third and will introduce additional legal risk (including as a result of newly applicable antifraud and anti-manipulation provisions and private rights of action). Once finalized, the rules may raise the costs and liquidity burden associated with Fifth Third’s derivatives activities and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Fifth Third and/or its affiliates are or may become the subject of litigation or regulatory or other enforcement proceedings that could result in substantial legal liability and damage to Fifth Third’s reputation.

Fifth Third and certain of its directors and officers have been named from time to time as defendants in various class actions and other litigation relating to Fifth Third’s business and activities. Past, present and future litigation have included or could include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Enforcement authorities may seek admissions of wrongdoing and, in some cases, criminal pleas as part of the resolutions of matters, and any such resolution of a matter involving Fifth Third which could lead to increased exposure to private litigation, could adversely affect Fifth Third’s reputation, and could result in limitations on Fifth Third’s ability to do business in certain jurisdictions. Legal, regulatory and other enforcement proceedings could also result in

200  Fifth Third Bancorp


material adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief, amendments and/or restatements of Fifth Third’s SEC filings and/or financial statements, as applicable and/or determinations of material weaknesses in its disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, responding to inquiries, investigations, lawsuits and proceedings, regardless of the ultimate outcome of the matter, could be time-consuming and expensive. Like other large financial institutions and companies, Fifth Third is also subject to risk from potential employee misconduct, includingnon-compliance with policies and improper use or disclosure of confidential information. Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory or other enforcement action against Fifth Third could materially adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations and/or cause significant reputational harm to its business. The outcome of lawsuits and regulatory proceedings may be difficult to predict or estimate. Although Fifth Third establishes accruals for legal proceedings when information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated, Fifth Third does not have accruals for all legal proceedings where it faces a risk of loss. In addition, due to the inherent subjectivity of the assessments and unpredictability of the outcome of legal proceedings, amounts accrued may not represent the ultimate loss to Fifth Third from the legal proceedings in question. Thus, Fifth Third’s ultimate losses may be higher, and possibly significantly so, than the amounts accrued for legal loss contingencies, which could adversely affect Fifth Third’s results of operations. Please see “Legal and Regulatory Proceedings” in Fifth Third’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on specific legal and regulatory proceedings.

Fifth Third’s ability to pay or increase dividends on its common stock or to repurchase its capital stock is restricted.

Fifth Third’s ability to pay dividends or repurchase stock is subject to regulatory requirements and the need to meet regulatory expectations. As part of CCAR, Fifth Third’s capital plan is subject to an annual assessment by the FRB, and the FRB may object to Fifth Third’s capital plan if Fifth Third does not demonstrate an ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine-quarter planning horizon. If the FRB objects to Fifth Third’s capital plan, Fifth Third would be subject to limitations on its ability to make capital distributions (including paying dividends and repurchasing stock).

201  Fifth Third Bancorp


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Bancorp’s executive offices and the main office of Fifth Third Bank are located on Fountain Square Plaza in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio in a32-story office tower, a five-story office building with an attached parking garage and a separateten-story office building known as the Fifth Third Center, the William S. Rowe Building and the 530 Building, respectively. The Bancorp’s main operations campus is located in Cincinnati, Ohio, and is comprised of a three-story building with an attached parking garage known as the George A. Schaefer, Jr. Operations Center, and atwo-story building with surface parking known as the Madisonville Office Building. The Bank owns 100% of these buildings.

At December 31, 2016, the Bancorp, through its banking andnon-banking subsidiaries, operated 1,191 banking centers, of which 859 were owned, 229 were leased and 103 for which the buildings are owned but the land is leased. The banking centers are located in the states of Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Florida, Tennessee, North Carolina, West Virginia, and Georgia. The Bancorp’s significant owned properties are owned free from mortgages and major encumbrances.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE BANCORP

Officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors at the meeting of Directors immediately following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The names, ages and positions of the Executive Officers of the Bancorp as of February 24, are listed below along with their business experience during the past five years:

Greg D. Carmichael, 55. Chief Executive Officer of the Bancorp since November 2015 and President since September 2012. Previously, Mr. Carmichael was Chief Operating Officer of the Bancorp from June 2006 to August 2015, Executive Vice President of the Bancorp from June 2006 to September 2012 and Chief Information Officer of the Bancorp from June 2003 to June 2006.

Lars C. Anderson, 55. Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bancorp since August 2015. Previously, Mr. Anderson was Vice Chairman of Comerica Incorporated and Comerica Bank since December 2010.

Chad M. Borton, 46. Executive Vice President of the Bancorp since April 2014. Previously, Mr. Borton was Head of Retail Banking for Fifth Third Bank from July 2012 to April 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Borton served in multiple positions at JP Morgan Chase including the Head of Branch Administration from August 2011 to July 2012; Senior Vice President and Market Manager from August 2010 to August 2011; Head of Retail Distribution from 2008 to 2010 and Consumer Bank Chief Financial Officer from 2006 to 2008.

Frank R. Forrest, 62. Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of the Bancorp since April 2014. Previously, Mr. Forrest was Executive Vice President and Chief Risk and Credit Officer of the Bancorp since September 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Forrest served with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. From March 2012 until June 2013, Mr. Forrest served as Managing Director and Quality Control Executive for Legacy Asset Services, a division of Bank of America. From September 2008 until March 2012, Mr. Forrest was Managing Director and Global Debt Products Executive for Global Corporate and Investment Banking. Formerly from January 2007 to September 2008, Mr. Forrest was Risk Management Executive for Commercial Banking.

Mark D. Hazel, 51. Senior Vice President and Controller of the Bancorp since February 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Hazel was the Assistant Bancorp Controller since 2006 and was the Controller of Nonbank entities since 2003.

Aravind Immaneni, 46. Executive Vice President and Chief Operations and Technology Officer since November 14, 2016. Previously Mr. Immaneni worked for TD Bank as Executive Vice President and Head of Retail Distribution Strategy & Operations since November 2014, Senior Vice President and Head of Retail Bank Operations from August 2013 to November 2014, and Senior Vice President and Head of Deposit & Debit Operations from February 2011 to August 2013.

James C. Leonard, 47.Executive Vice President since September 2015 and Treasurer of the Bancorp since October 2013. Previously, Mr. Leonard was Senior Vice President from October 2013 to September 2015, the Director of Business Planning and Analysis from 2006 to 2013 and the Chief Financial Officer of the Commercial Banking Division from 2001 to 2006.

Philip R. McHugh, 52. Executive Vice President of the Bancorp since December 2014. Previously, Mr. McHugh was Executive Vice President of Fifth Third Bank since June 2011 and was Senior Vice President of Fifth Third Bank from June 2010 through June 2011. Prior to that, Mr. McHugh was the President and CEO of the Louisville Affiliate of Fifth Third Bank from January 2005 through June 2010.

Jelena McWilliams, 43. Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since January 9, 2017. Previously Ms. McWilliams was Chief Counsel since January 2015 and Deputy Staff Director since July 2016 of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. Previously she was Senior Counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs from July 2012 to December 2015. Prior to that, she served as Assistant Chief Counsel to the U.S. Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee and before that as an attorney at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Prior to government service, she practiced as an attorney with Morrison & Foerster LLP in Palo Alto, California and then with Hogan & Hartson LLP (now Hogan Lovells LLP) in Washington, D.C.

Timothy N. Spence, 38. Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer of the Bancorp since September 2015. Previously, Mr. Spence was a senior partner in the Financial Services practice at Oliver Wyman since 2006, a global strategy and risk management consulting firm.

Teresa J. Tanner, 48. Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since September 2015. Previously, Ms. Tanner was the Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Bancorp since February 2010 and Senior Vice President and Director of Enterprise Learning since September 2008. Prior to that, she was Human Resources Senior Vice President and Senior Business Partner for the Information Technology and Central Operations divisions since July 2006. Previously, she was Vice President and Senior Business Partner for Operations since September 2004.

Tayfun Tuzun, 52. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bancorp since October 2013. Previously, Mr. Tuzun was the Senior Vice President and Treasurer of the Bancorp from December 2011 to October 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Tuzun was the Assistant Treasurer and Balance Sheet Manager of Fifth Third Bancorp. Previously, Mr. Tuzun was the Structured Finance Manager since 2007.

202  Fifth Third Bancorp


PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Bancorp’s common stock is traded in theover-the-counter market and is listed under the symbol “FITB” on the NASDAQ® Global Select Market System.

High and Low Stock Prices and Dividends Paid Per Share

 

2016  High  Low  Dividends Paid     
Per Share       

 

Fourth Quarter

  $27.88    $19.57    $0.14  

Third Quarter

  $21.11    $16.26    $0.13  

Second Quarter

  $19.34    $16.02    $0.13  

First Quarter

  $19.73    $13.84    $0.13  

 

      

 

2015  High  Low  Dividends Paid     
Per Share       

 

Fourth Quarter

  $21.14    $18.15    $0.13  

Third Quarter

  $21.93    $18.21    $0.13  

Second Quarter

  $21.90    $18.63    $0.13  

First Quarter

  $20.53    $17.14    $0.13  

 

See a discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the Bancorp discussed in Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, as of December 31, 2016, the Bancorp had 42,892 shareholders of record.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Period  

Total Number of  

Shares Purchased(a)

    

Average Price Paid

Per Share        

    Total Number of Shares      
Purchased as Part of Publicly  
Announced Plans or Programs
  Maximum Number of Shares     
that May Yet be Purchased       
Under the Plans or            
Programs(b)                

 

October 2016

  120,199     $                        20.24    

  87,584,352     

November 2016

  1,468,615     20.87    1,099,205   86,485,147     

December 2016

  4,965,665     27.17    4,843,750   81,641,397     

 

Total

  6,554,479     $                        25.63    5,942,955   81,641,397     

 

(a)

The Bancorp repurchased 120,199, 369,410 and 121,915 shares during October, November and December of 2016, respectively, in connection with various employee compensation plans of the Securities Exchange ActBancorp. These purchases do not count against the maximum number of 1934,shares that may yet be purchased under the Registrant has duly caused this reportBoard of Directors’ authorization.

(b)

In March 2016, the Bancorp announced that its Board of Directors had authorized management to be signed on its behalfpurchase 100 million shares of the Bancorp’s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction. The authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date. This share repurchase authorization replaces the Board’s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 14 million shares remained available for repurchase by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.Bancorp.

See further discussion on accelerated share repurchase transactions and stock-based compensation in Note 23 and Note 24 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

203  Fifth Third Bancorp


The following performance graphs do not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Bancorp specifically incorporates the performance graphs by reference therein.

Total Return Analysis

The graphs below summarize the cumulative return experienced by the Bancorp’s shareholders over the years 2011 through 2016, and 2006 through 2016, respectively, compared to the S&P 500 Stock and the S&P Banks indices.

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP VS. MARKET INDICES

LOGO

Shares Issued Under Certain Employee Benefit Plans

As previously disclosed, during the fourth quarter of 2016, the Bancorp determined that a number of shares of Fifth Third Bancorp common stock offered under our 401(k) Plan were previously inadvertently omitted from inclusion in the correspondingS-8 registration statement. As a result, approximately 207,444 unregistered shares were sold through the 401(k) Plan during the fourth quarter of 2016.

The Bancorp filed the required FormS-8 for the 401(k) Plan on November 10, 2016 and plans to make a voluntary rescission offer to eligible plan participants in order to remediate the registration defect during the first half of 2017. The Bancorp also plans to make rescission offers to participants of other plans as well for previously disclosed registration and prospectus delivery failures. Based on the market price of Fifth Third Bancorp’s common stock in February 2017, the Bancorp does not expect that the exercise of any applicable rescission rights will have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.

204  Fifth Third Bancorp


PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item relating to the Executive Officers of the Registrant is included in PART I under “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE BANCORP.”

The information required by this item concerning Directors and the nomination process is incorporated herein by reference under the caption “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by this item concerning the Audit Committee and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE” and “BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ITS COMMITTEES, MEETINGS AND FUNCTIONS” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by this item concerning Section 16 (a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance is incorporated herein by reference under the caption “SECTION 16 (a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS,” “COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS,” “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT” and “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security ownership information of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS,” “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS” and “COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The information required by this item concerning Equity Compensation Plan information is included in Note 24 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS”, “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”, “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE” and “BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ITS COMMITTEES, MEETINGS AND FUNCTIONS” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference under the caption “PRINCIPAL INDEPENDENT

EXTERNAL AUDIT FIRM FEES” of the Bancorp’s Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Pages

Public Accounting Firm

93-94

Fifth Third Bancorp and Subsidiaries Consolidated Financial Statements

95-99

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

100-182

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP

The schedules for the Bancorp and its subsidiaries are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required, or because the information is set forth in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

The following lists the Exhibits to the Annual Report onForm 10-K.

2.1

Master Investment Agreement (excluding exhibits and schedules) dated as of March 27, 2009 and amended as of June 30, 2009, among Fifth Third Bank, Fifth Third Financial Corporation, Advent-Kong Blocker Corp., FTPS Holding, LLC and Fifth Third Processing Solutions, LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on July 2, 2009.

Registrant

3.1

Amended Articles of Incorporation of Fifth Third Bancorp, as Amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2014.

/s/ Kevin T. Kabat

Kevin T. Kabat
Vice Chairman and CEO
Principal Executive Officer
February 25, 2015
3.2

PursuantCode of Regulations of Fifth Third Bancorp, as Amended as of September 15, 2014. Incorporated by reference to requirements ofExhibit 3.2 to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signedRegistrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2016.

4.1

Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 20, 1997 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1997.

4.2

Indenture, dated as of May 23, 2003, between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2003.

4.3

Global Security representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 4.50% Subordinated Notes due 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2003.

4.4

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2006, between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

4.5

First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 30, 2007 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, to the Junior Subordinated Indenture dated as of May 20, 1997 between Fifth Third Bancorp and the Wilmington Trust Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2007.

4.6

Global Security dated as of March 4, 2008 representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 8.25% Subordinated Notes due 2038. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. (1)

4.7

Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2008.

205  Fifth Third Bancorp


4.8First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 25, 2011 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third and the Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 25, 2011.
4.9

Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 7, 2012 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third Bancorp and the Wilmington Trust Company. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2012.

4.10

Global Security dated as of March 7, 2012 representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 3.500% Senior Notes due 2022. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2012.

4.11

Deposit Agreement dated as of May 16, 2013, between Fifth Third Bancorp, as issuer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as depositary and calculation agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as transfer agent and registrar, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts issued thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2013.

4.12

Form of Certificate Representing the 5.10%Fixed-to-Floating RateNon-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2013.

4.13

Form of Depositary Receipt for the 5.10%Fixed-to-Floating RateNon-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2013.

4.14

Global Security dated as of November 20, 2013 representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 4.30% Subordinated Notes due 2024. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2013.

4.15

Deposit Agreement dated December 9, 2013, between Fifth Third Bancorp, as issuer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as depositary and calculation agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as transfer agent and registrar, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts issued thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2013.

4.16

Form of Certificate Representing the 6.625%Fixed-to-Floating RateNon-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2013.

4.17

Form of Depositary Receipt for the 6.625%Fixed-to-Floating RateNon-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2013.

4.18

Deposit Agreement dated June 5, 2014, among Fifth Third Bancorp, as issuer, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as depositary and calculation agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as transfer agent and registrar, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts issued thereunder. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

4.19

Form of Certificate Representing the 4.90%Fixed-to-Floating RateNon-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

4.20

Form of Depositary Receipt for the 4.90%Fixed-to-Floating RateNon-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series J, of Fifth Third Bancorp. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrant’s

Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014.

4.21

Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 28, 2014 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third Bancorp and the Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on February 28, 2014.

4.22

Global Security dated as of February 28, 2014, representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $500,000,000 in principal amount of its 2.30% Senior Notes due 2019. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on February 28, 2014.

4.23

Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 27, 2015 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to the Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of April 30, 2008 between Fifth Third Bancorp and the Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on July 27, 2015.

4.24

Global Security dated as of July 27, 2015, representing Fifth Third Bancorp’s $1,100,000,000 in principal amount of its 2.875% Senior Notes due 2020. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on July 27, 2015.

4.25

Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of RegulationS-K. The Registrant hereby undertakes to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of any such instruments.

10.1

Fifth Third Bancorp Unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. *

10.2

Indenture effective November 19, 1992 between Fifth Third Bancorp, Issuer and NBD Bank, N.A., Trustee. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 18, 1992 and as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-3, RegistrationNo. 33-54134.

10.3

Fifth Third Bancorp Master Profit Sharing Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.*

10.4

First Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp Master Profit Sharing Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.*

10.5

Second Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp Master Profit Sharing Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.*

10.6

Third Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp Master Profit Sharing Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.7

Fifth Third Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.*

10.8

First Amendment to Fifth Third Bancorp 401(k) Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2016.*

10.9

The Fifth Third Bancorp Master Retirement Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.**

10.10

First Amendment to The Fifth Third Bancorp Master Retirement Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2016.*

10.11

Second Amendment to The Fifth Third Bancorp Master Retirement Plan, as Amended and Restated.*

10.12

Fifth Third Bancorp Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Annex 2 to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated February 19, 2004.*

206  Fifth Third Bancorp


10.13

Fifth Third Bancorp 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Annex 2 to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated March 6, 2008.*

10.14

Fifth Third Bancorp 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated March 6, 2014.*

10.15

Amended and Restated Fifth Third Bancorp 1993 Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.*

10.16

Fifth Third BancorpNon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.*

10.17

Amendment to the Fifth Third BancorpNon-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, as Amended and Restated. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.*

10.18

Fifth Third Bancorp Stock Option Gain Deferral Plan. Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Proxy Statement dated February 9, 2001.*

10.19

Amendment No. 1 to Fifth Third Bancorp Stock Option Gain Deferral Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2005. *

10.20

Amended and Restated First National Bankshares of Florida, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to First National Bankshares of Florida, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. *

10.21

Fifth Third Bancorp Executive Change in Control Severance Plan, effective January 1, 2015. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 21, 2014.*

10.22

Warrant dated June 30, 2009 issued by Vantiv Holding, LLC to Fifth Third Bank. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit L to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D/A filed with the Commission on December 30, 2015.

10.23

Second Amended & Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (excluding certain exhibits) dated as of March 21, 2012 by and among Vantiv, Inc., Fifth Third Bank, FTPS Partners, LLC, Vantiv Holding, LLC and each person who becomes a member after March 21, 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.24

Amendment and Restatement Agreement and Reaffirmation (excluding certain schedules) dated as of June 30, 2009 among Fifth Third Processing Solutions, LLC, FTPS Holding, LLC, Card Management Company, LLC, Fifth Third Holdings, LLC and Fifth Third Bank. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on July 2, 2009.

10.25

Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 21, 2012 by and among Vantiv, Inc., Fifth Third Bank, FTPS Partners, LLC, JPDN Enterprises, LLC and certain stockholders of Vantiv, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit E to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.26

Exchange Agreement dated as of March 21, 2012 by and among Vantiv, Inc., Vantiv Holding, LLC, Fifth Third Bank, FTPS Partners, LLC and such other holders of Class B Units and Class CNon-Voting Units that are from time to time parties of the Exchange Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.27

Recapitalization Agreement dated as of March 21, 2012 by and among Vantiv, Inc., Vantiv Holding, LLC, Fifth Third Bank, FTPS Partners, LLC, JPDN Enterprises, LLC and certain stockholders of Vantiv, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit D to the Registrant’s Schedule 13D filed with the Commission on April 2, 2012.

10.28

Stock Appreciation Right Award Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.29

Performance Share Award Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.30

Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for Directors). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.31

Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for Executive Officers). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.*

10.32

Stock Appreciation Right Award Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.*

10.33

Performance Share Award Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.*

10.34

Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (for Directors). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.*

10.35

Restricted Stock Award Agreement (for Executive Officers). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.*

10.36

Master Confirmation, as supplemented by a Supplemental Confirmation, for accelerated share repurchase transaction dated October 20, 2014 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.**

10.37

Master Confirmation, as supplemented by a Supplemental Confirmation, for accelerated share repurchase transaction dated July 29, 2015 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed with the Commission on November 5, 2015.**

10.38

Supplemental Confirmation dated September 3, 2015, to Master Confirmation, dated May 21, 2013, for accelerated share repurchase transaction between Fifth Third Bancorp and Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch, with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. acting as agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed with the Commission on November 5, 2015. Master Confirmation is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2013.**

10.39

Separation Agreement between Fifth Third Bancorp and Dan Poston dated October 2, 2015. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K/A filed with the Commission on October 6, 2015.

10.40

Master Confirmation, as supplemented by a Supplemental Confirmation, for accelerated share repurchase transaction dated April 27, 2015 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Barclays Bank PLC, through its agent Barclays Capital Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed with the Commission on August 5, 2015.**

10.41

Offer letter from Fifth Third Bancorp to Lars C. Anderson. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on July 16, 2015**

10.42

Master Confirmation, dated January 22, 2015, and Supplemental Confirmation, for accelerated share repurchase transaction dated January 22, 2015 between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2015.**

10.43

Supplemental Confirmation dated December 9, 2015, to Master Confirmation dated January 22, 2015, for accelerated share repurchase transaction between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2016.**

10.44

Supplemental Confirmation dated March 1, 2016, to Master Confirmation dated July 29, 2015, for accelerated share repurchase transaction between Fifth Third Bancorp and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 6, 2016**

10.45

Supplemental Confirmation dated August 2, 2016, to Master Confirmation dated January 22, 2015, for accelerated share repurchase transaction between Fifth Third Bancorp and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed with the Commission on November 9, 2016**

207  Fifth Third Bancorp


10.46

Bancorp Director Pay Program. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed with the Commission on November 9, 2016*

10.47

Supplemental Confirmation dated December 15, 2016, to Master Confirmation dated May 21, 2013, for accelerated share repurchase transaction between Fifth Third Bancorp and Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch.**

10.48

2016 Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement (for Directors).*

10.49

2017 Stock Appreciation Right Award Agreement (for Executive Officers).*

10.50

2017 Performance Share Award Agreement.*

10.51

2017 Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement (for Executive Officers).*

10.52

Long-Term Incentive Award Overview February 2017 Grants.*

12.1

Computations of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed 12.1Computations of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

12.2

Computations of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements.

21

Fifth Third Bancorp Subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2016.

23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm-Deloitte & Touche LLP.

31(i)

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer.

31(ii)

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.

32(i)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Executive Officer.

32(ii)

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Chief Financial Officer.

99.1

Consent Order pursuant to the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, dated September 28, 2015, between Fifth Third Bank and the U.S. Department of Justice regarding indirect auto loans. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on September 29, 2015.

99.2

Consent Order pursuant to the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, dated September 28, 2015, between Fifth Third Bank and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, including the Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order, dated September 28, 2015, by Fifth Third Bank regarding indirect auto loans. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the following personsRegistrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on September 29, 2015.

99.3

Consent Order pursuant to the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, dated September 28, 2015, between Fifth Third Bank and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, including the Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order, dated September 28, 2015, by Fifth Third Bank regarding credit cardadd-on products. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on September 29, 2015.

99.4

Settlement Agreement entered into on September 30, 2015, between the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Fifth Third Bancorp and its subsidiaries. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on October 7, 2015.

99.5

Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal entered into on September 30, 2015, by and among plaintiff the United States of America and on behalf of the RegistrantUnited States Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Federal Housing Administration and Fifth Third Bancorp and its subsidiaries (excluding exhibits). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form8-K filed with the Commission on October 7, 2015.

101

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text and in the capacities indicated.detail.

(1)

Fifth Third Bancorp also entered into an identical security on March 4, 2008 representing an additional $500,000,000 of its 8.25% Subordinated Notes due 2038.

(2)

  Fifth Third Bancorp also entered into an identical security on November 20, 2013 representing an additional $250,000,000 in principal amount of its 4.30% Subordinated Notes due 2024.

*     Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

**   An application for confidential treatment for selected portions of this exhibit has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

208  Fifth Third Bancorp


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP

Registrant

/s/ Greg D. Carmichael                        
Greg D. Carmichael
President and CEO
Principal Executive Officer
February 24, 2017

OFFICERS:

Pursuant to requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on February 24, 2017 by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.

/s/ Kevin T. Kabat

Kevin T. KabatVice Chairman and CEOPrincipal Executive Officer

/s/ Tayfun Tuzun
OFFICERS:

/s/ Greg D. Carmichael                        

Greg D. Carmichael
President and CEO
Principal Executive Officer
/s/ Tayfun Tuzun                                 
Tayfun Tuzun
Executive Vice President and CFO
Principal Financial Officer

/s/ Mark D. Hazel

Mark D. Hazel
Senior Vice President and CFO
Principal Financial Officer
/s/ Mark D. Hazel                                
Mark D. Hazel
SeniorVice President and Controller
Principal Accounting Officer

DIRECTORS:

/s/ Marsha C. Williams

Marsha C. Williams
Board Chair

/s/ Nicholas K. Akins

Nicholas K. Akins

B. Evan Bayh III

/s/ Jorge L. Benitez

Jorge L. Benitez

/s/ Katherine B. Blackburn                         

Katherine B. Blackburn

/s/ Emerson L. Brumback

Emerson L. Brumback

/s/ Jerry W. Burris

Jerry W. Burris

/s/ Greg D. Carmichael

Greg D. Carmichael

/s/ Gary R. Heminger

Gary R. Heminger

/s/ Jewell D. Hoover

Jewell D. Hoover

/s/ Eileen A. Mallesch

Eileen A. Mallesch

Michael B. McCallister

/s/ Hendrik G. Meijer

Hendrik G. Meijer

DIRECTORS:

/s/ James P. Hackett

James P. Hackett
Chairman

/s/ Marsha C. Williams

Marsha C. Williams
Lead Director

/s/ Nicholas K. Akins

Nicholas K. Akins

/s/ B. Evan Bayh III

B. Evan Bayh III

/s/ Katherine B. Blackburn

Katherine B. Blackburn

/s/ Ulysses L. Bridgeman, Jr.

Ulysses L. Bridgeman, Jr.

/s/ Emerson L. Brumback

Emerson L. Brumback

/s/ Gary R. Heminger

Gary R. Heminger

/s/ Jewell D. Hoover

Jewell D. Hoover

/s/ Kevin T. Kabat

Kevin T. Kabat

/s/ Mitchel D. Livingston, Ph.D.

Mitchel D. Livingston, Ph.D.

/s/ Michael B. McCallister

Michael B. McCallister

/s/ Hendrik G. Meijer

Hendrik G. Meijer

186  Fifth Third Bancorp


CONSOLIDATED TEN YEAR COMPARISON

AVERAGE ASSETS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 ($ IN MILLIONS) 
    

Interest-Earning Assets

             
    Year          Loans and
Leases
   Federal Funds
  Sold
(a)
  

        Interest-

        Bearing
        Deposits in
         Banks
(a)

          Securities  Total                  Cash and Due
             from Banks
        Other
      Assets
          Total Average
    Assets
 

    2014

 

$

 91,127    -        3,043    21,823        $      115,993   2,892        14,539  $     131,943       

    2013

  89,093    1      2,416    16,444     107,954   2,482        15,053    123,732       

    2012

  84,822    2      1,493    15,319     101,636   2,355        15,695    117,614       

    2011

  80,214    1      2,030    15,437     97,682   2,352        15,335    112,666       

    2010

  79,232    11      3,317    16,371     98,931   2,245        14,841    112,434       

    2009

  83,391    12      1,023    17,100     101,526   2,329        14,266    114,856       

    2008

  85,835    438      183    13,424     99,880   2,490        13,411    114,296       

    2007

  78,348    257      147    11,630     90,382   2,275        10,613    102,477       

    2006

  73,493    252      144    20,910     94,799   2,477        8,713    105,238       

    2005

   67,737    88      113    24,806     92,744   2,750        8,102       102,876       

AVERAGE DEPOSITS AND SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 ($ IN MILLIONS)  
Deposits       
    Year     Demand  Interest
Checking
  Savings  Money
Market
  Other
Time
  Certificates
$100,000 and
Over
  Foreign
Office
  Total  Short-Term
Borrowings
  Total 
2014     $        31,755   25,382    16,080   14,670    3,762   3,929           1,828    $     97,406   2,331      $     99,737       
2013  29,925   23,582    18,440   9,467    3,760   6,339           1,518     93,031   3,527       96,558       
2012  27,196   23,096    21,393   4,903    4,306   3,102           1,555     85,551   4,806       90,357       
2011  23,389   18,707    21,652   5,154    6,260   3,656           3,497     82,315   3,122       85,437       
2010  19,669   18,218    19,612   4,808    10,526   6,083           3,361     82,277   1,926       84,203       
2009  16,862   15,070    16,875   4,320    14,103   10,367           2,265     79,862   6,980       86,842       
2008  14,017   14,191    16,192   6,127    11,135   9,531           4,220     75,413   10,760       86,173       
2007  13,261   14,820    14,836   6,308    10,778   6,466           3,155     69,624   6,890       76,514       
2006  13,741   16,650    12,189   6,366    10,500   5,795           3,711     68,952   8,670       77,622       
2005  13,868   18,884    10,007   5,170    8,491   4,001           3,967     64,388   9,511       73,899       

INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 ($ IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)  
                 Per Share(b) 
                          Originally Reported 
    Year     Interest
Income
  Interest
Expense
  Noninterest
Income
  Noninterest
Expense
  Net Income (Loss)
Available to
Common
Shareholders
  Earnings  Diluted
Earnings
  Dividends
Declared
    Earnings  Diluted
Earnings
 
2014     $        4,030   451   2,473       3,709       1,414        1.68      1.66    0.51    1.68       $        1.66      
2013  3,973   412   3,227       3,961       1,799        2.05      2.02    0.47    2.05        2.02      
2012  4,107   512   2,999       4,081       1,541        1.69      1.66    0.36    1.69        1.66      
2011  4,218   661   2,455       3,758       1,094        1.20      1.18    0.28    1.20        1.18      
2010  4,489   885   2,729       3,855       503        0.63      0.63    0.04    0.63        0.63      
2009  4,668   1,314   4,782       3,826       511        0.73      0.67    0.04    0.73        0.67      
2008  5,608   2,094   2,946       4,564       (2,180)        (3.91)      (3.91)    0.75    (3.94)        (3.94)      
2007  6,027   3,018   2,467       3,311       1,075        1.99      1.98    1.70    2.00        1.99      
2006  5,955   3,082   2,012       2,915       1,188        2.13      2.12    1.58    2.14        2.13      
2005  4,995   2,030   2,374       2,801       1,548        2.79      2.77    1.46    2.79        2.77      

MISCELLANEOUS AT DECEMBER 31 ($ IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)            
       Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity         
    Year      Common
Shares
Outstanding
   Common
Stock
   Preferred
Stock
   Capital
Surplus
   Retained
Earnings
   Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
   Treasury
Stock
   Total   Book Value
Per Share
   Allowance for
Loan and
Lease Losses
 
2014   824,046,952   $    2,051       1,331         2,646     11,141     429            (1,972)     $    15,626     17.35       $      1,322     
2013   855,305,745    2,051      1,034        2,561    10,156    82           (1,295)      14,589    15.85        1,582     
2012   882,152,057    2,051      398        2,758    8,768    375           (634)      13,716    15.10        1,854     
2011   919,804,436    2,051      398        2,792    7,554    470           (64)      13,201    13.92        2,255     
2010   796,272,522    1,779      3,654        1,715    6,719    314           (130)      14,051    13.06        3,004     
2009   795,068,164    1,779      3,609        1,743    6,326    241           (201)      13,497    12.44        3,749     
2008   577,386,612    1,295      4,241        848    5,824    98           (229)      12,077    13.57        2,787     
2007   532,671,925    1,295      9        1,779    8,413    (126)           (2,209)      9,161    17.18        937     
2006   556,252,674    1,295      9        1,812    8,317    (179)           (1,232)      10,022    18.00        771     
2005   555,623,430    1,295      9        1,827    8,007    (413)           (1,279)      9,446    16.98        744     

209  Fifth Third Bancorp


CONSOLIDATED TEN YEAR COMPARISON

AVERAGE ASSETS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 ($ IN MILLIONS)

 

    Interest-Earning Assets              
  

 

   
Year   Loans and
Leases
 Federal Funds
Sold
(a)
 Interest-Bearing
Deposits in
Banks
(a)
 Securities Total Cash and Due
from Banks
 Other Assets(c) Total Average
Assets
(c)

 

2016

 $ 94,320 1         1,865 30,099 126,285   2,303 14,963 142,266

2015

  93,339 1         3,257 26,987 123,584   2,608 15,179 140,078

2014

  91,127 -         3,043 21,823 115,993   2,892 14,505 131,909

2013

  89,093 1         2,416 16,444 107,954   2,482 15,025 123,704

2012

  84,822 2         1,493 15,319 101,636   2,355 15,643 117,562

2011

  80,214 1         2,030 15,437   97,682   2,352 15,259 112,590

2010

  79,232 11         3,317 16,371   98,931   2,245 14,758 112,351

2009

  83,391 12         1,023 17,100 101,526   2,329 14,179 114,769

2008

  85,835 438           183 13,424   99,880   2,490 13,326 114,211

2007

  78,348 257           147 11,630   90,382   2,275 10,578 102,442

 

AVERAGE DEPOSITS AND SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 ($ IN MILLIONS)

 

    Deposits      
  

 

  
Year   Demand   Interest
Checking
 Savings Money
Market
 Other Time Certificates
$100,000 and
Over
 Foreign
Office and
Other
 Total Short-Term
Borrowings
 Total

 

2016

 

$

 

35,862

  25,143 14,346   19,523 4,010     2,735           830 102,449     3,351       105,800    

2015

  

35,164

  26,160 14,951   18,152 4,051     2,869           874 102,221     2,641       104,862    

2014

  

31,755

  25,382 16,080   14,670 3,762     3,929       1,828 97,406     2,331       99,737    

2013

  

29,925

  23,582 18,440     9,467 3,760     6,339       1,518 93,031     3,527       96,558    

2012

  

27,196

  23,096 21,393     4,903 4,306     3,102       1,555 85,551     4,806       90,357    

2011

  

23,389

  18,707 21,652     5,154 6,260     3,656       3,497 82,315     3,122       85,437    

2010

  

19,669

  18,218 19,612     4,808 10,526     6,083       3,361 82,277     1,926       84,203    

2009

  

16,862

  15,070 16,875     4,320 14,103     10,367       2,265 79,862     6,980       86,842    

2008

  

14,017

  14,191 16,192     6,127 11,135     9,531       4,220 75,413     10,760       86,173    

2007

  

13,261

  14,820 14,836     6,308 10,778     6,466       3,155 69,624     6,890       76,514    

 

INCOME (LOSS) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 ($ IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

 

                

Per Share(b)

                      

Originally Reported

Year   Interest
Income
   Interest
Expense
 Noninterest
Income
 Noninterest
Expense
 Net Income (Loss)
Available
to Common
Shareholders
 Earnings Diluted
Earnings
 Dividends
Declared
 Earnings Diluted
Earnings

 

2016

 $     4,193  578       2,696   3,903 1,489          1.95      1.93 0.53 1.95    1.93   

2015

      4,028  495       3,003   3,775 1,637          2.03      2.01 0.52 2.03    2.01   

2014

      4,030  451       2,473   3,709 1,414          1.68      1.66 0.51 1.68    1.66   

2013

      3,973  412       3,227   3,961 1,799          2.05      2.02 0.47 2.05    2.02   

2012

      4,107  512       2,999   4,081 1,541          1.69      1.66 0.36 1.69    1.66   

2011

      4,218  661       2,455   3,758 1,094          1.20      1.18 0.28 1.20    1.18   

2010

      4,489  885       2,729   3,855 503          0.63      0.63 0.04 0.63    0.63   

2009

      4,668  1,314       4,782   3,826 511          0.73      0.67 0.04 0.73    0.67   

2008

      5,608  2,094       2,946   4,564 (2,180)         (3.91)     (3.91) 0.75 (3.94)   (3.94)  

2007

      6,027  3,018       2,467   3,311 1,075          1.99      1.98 1.70 2.00    1.99   

 

MISCELLANEOUS AT DECEMBER 31 ($ IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

 

        

Bancorp Shareholders’ Equity

    
Year   Common Shares
Outstanding
   Common
Stock
 Preferred
Stock
 Capital
Surplus
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Treasury
Stock
 Total Book Value
Per Share
 

Allowance for

Loan and

Lease Losses

 

2016

  750,479,299     $ 2,051    1,331 2,756       13,441 59            (3,433) 16,205 19.82     1,253    

2015

  785,080,314  2,051    1,331 2,666       12,358 197            (2,764) 15,839 18.48     1,272    

2014

  824,046,952  2,051    1,331 2,646       11,141 429            (1,972) 15,626 17.35     1,322    

2013

  855,305,745  2,051    1,034 2,561       10,156 82            (1,295) 14,589 15.85     1,582    

2012

  882,152,057  2,051      398 2,758         8,768 375                (634) 13,716 15.10     1,854    

2011

  919,804,436  2,051      398 2,792         7,554 470                  (64) 13,201 13.92     2,255    

2010

  796,272,522  1,779    3,654 1,715         6,719 314                (130) 14,051 13.06     3,004    

2009

  795,068,164  1,779    3,609 1,743         6,326 241                (201) 13,497 12.44     3,749    

2008

  577,386,612  1,295    4,241 848         5,824 98                (229) 12,077 13.57     2,787    

2007

  532,671,925  1,295           9 1,779         8,413 (126)            (2,209)   9,161 17.18     937    

 

(a)

Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks are combined in other short-term investments in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)

Adjusted for accounting guidance related to the calculation of earnings per share, which was adopted retroactively on January 1, 2009.

187  Fifth Third Bancorp(c)


DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP

DIRECTORS

James P. Hackett, Chairman

ViceUpon adoption of ASU2015-03 on January 1, 2016, the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended 2007-2015 were adjusted to reflect the reclassification of average debt issuance costs from average other assets to average long-term debt, respectively. For further information, refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

210  Fifth Third Bancorp


DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP DIRECTORS

Marsha C. Williams, Board Chair Board of

Directors

Steelcase, Inc.

Marsha C. Williams, Lead

Director

Retired Senior Vice President

&

Chief Financial Officer

Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.

Nicholas K. Akins

President & CEO

American Electric Power

Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.

Nicholas K. Akins

Chairman, President &

Chief Executive Officer

American Electric Power Company

B. Evan Bayh III

Partner

McGuireWoods LLP

Jorge L. Benitez

Retired Chief Executive Officer

North America of Accenture plc

Katherine B. Blackburn

Executive Vice President

Cincinnati Bengals,

Ulysses L. Bridgeman, Jr.

President

B.F. Companies Inc.

Emerson L. Brumback

Retired President & COOChief Operating Officer

M&T Bank

Jerry W. Burris

Retired President and Chief Executive Officer

Associated Materials Group, Inc.

Greg D. Carmichael

President & Chief Executive Officer

Fifth Third Bancorp

Gary R. Heminger

President, CEOChief Executive Officer & DirectorChairman

Marathon Petroleum

Corporation

Jewell D. Hoover

Principal & Bank ConsultantRetired Senior Official

Hoover and Associates, LLCComptroller of the Currency

Kevin T. Kabat

Vice Chairman & CEO

Fifth Third Bancorp

Mitchel D. Livingston, Ph.D.Eileen A. Mallesch

Retired Vice President for

Student Affairs

& Chief DiversityFinancial Officer

University of CincinnatiNationwide Property & Casualty Segment,

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

Michael B. McCallister

Retired Chairman & CEOChief Executive Officer

Humana Inc.

Hendrik G. Meijer

Co-Chairman, Director Chief Executive Officer &

& CEODirector

Meijer, Inc.

DIRECTORS EMERITI

Darryl F. Allen

John F. Barrett

J. Kenneth Blackwell

Milton C. Boesel, Jr.

Douglas G. Cowan

Thomas L. Dahl

Ronald A. Dauwe

Gerald V. Dirvin

Thomas B. Donnell

Richard T. Farmer

John D. Geary

Ivan W. Gorr

Joseph H. Head, Jr.

Allen M. Hill

William M. Isaac

William J. Keating

Jerry L. Kirby

Robert L. Koch II

Kenneth W. Lowe

Robert B. Morgan

Michael H. Norris

David E. Reese

James E. Rogers

George A. Schaefer, Jr.

John J. Schiff, Jr.

Donald B. Shackelford

David B. Sharrock

Stephen Stranahan

Dudley S. Taft

Alton C. Wendzel

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP

OFFICERS

Kevin T. Kabat

Vice Chairman & CEO

Greg D. Carmichael

President &

Chief Executive Officer

Lars C. Anderson

Executive Vice President &

Chief Operating Officer

Chad M. Borton

Executive Vice President

Frank R. Forrest

Executive Vice President &

Chief Risk Officer

Mark D. Hazel

Senior Vice President &

Controller

Gregory L. KoschAravind Immaneni

Executive Vice President &

Chief Operations

and Technology Officer

James C. Leonard

SeniorExecutive Vice President &

Treasurer

Philip R. McHugh

Executive Vice President

Daniel T. PostonJelena McWilliams

Executive Vice President,

Chief Legal Officer &

Corporate Secretary

Timothy N. Spence

Executive Vice President &

Chief Strategy and

Administrative Officer

Joseph R. Robinson

Executive Vice President &

Chief Information Officer

Robert A. Sullivan

Senior Executive Vice

President

Teresa J. Tanner

Executive Vice President &

Chief Human Resources

Administrative Officer

Mary E. Tuuk

Executive Vice President of

Corporate Services &

Board Secretary

Tayfun Tuzun

Executive Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer

AFFILIATEREGIONAL PRESIDENTS

Donald Abel, Jr.Ralph S. Michael III

(Group Regional President)

Michael Ash

Steven Alonso

David A. Call

Hal Clemmer

Timothy Elsbrock

(Market President)

David Girodat

Shawn Hagan

Thomas Heiks

Jerry Kelsheimer

Randy Koporc

Robert W. LaClair

Brian Lamb

Ralph S. Michael III

Jordan A. Miller, Jr.

Thomas PartridgeEric Smith

(Market President)

Robert A. Sullivan

Thomas G. Welch, Jr.

FIFTH THIRD BANCORP

BOARD COMMITTEES

Audit Committee

Emerson L. Brumback, Chair

Katherine B. Blackburn

Jerry W. Burris

Jewell D. Hoover

Marsha C. Williams

Finance Committee

Gary R. Heminger, Chair

Emerson L. Brumback

James P. Hackett

Kevin T. Kabat

Marsha C. Williams

Audit CommitteeNicholas K. Akins

Emerson L. Brumback Chair

Nicholas K. Akins

Jewell D. Hoover

Michael B. McCallister

Marsha C. Williams

Human Capital and

Compensation Committee

Marsha C. Williams,Michael B. McCallister, Chair

Nicholas K. Akins

Gary R. Heminger

Mitchel D. Livingston, Ph. D.

Hendrik G. Meijer

Nominating and Corporate

Governance Committee

Ulysses L. Bridgeman, Jr.,

Nicholas K. Akins, Chair

B. Evan Bayh III

Jorge L. Benitez

Gary R. Heminger

Hendrik G. MeijerMarsha C. Williams

Risk and Compliance

Committee

Jewell D. Hoover, Chair

B. Evan Bayh III

Mitchel D. Livingston, Ph. D.Jorge L. Benitez

Eileen A. Mallesch

Hendrik G. Meijer

Marsha C. Williams

 

 

188211  Fifth Third Bancorp