UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

 

þ

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142017

or

¨

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to            .

Commission File Number001-12917

REIS, INC.

 

Maryland

 

13-3926898

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

530 Fifth1185 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY

 

10036

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)Offices) (Zip Code)

                                             (212) 921-1122                                             

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

(212) 921-1122
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

  

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.02 par value per share  The NASDAQ Stock Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer¨

  Accelerated filerþ Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company ¨
Non-accelerated filer (Do☐  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the voting andnon-voting common equity held bynon-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $184,000,000$196,000,000 based on the closing price on the NASDAQ Global Market for such shares on June 30, 2014.2017. (Please see “Calculation of Aggregate Market Value ofNon-Affiliate Shares” within Item 5 of this report for a statement of assumptions upon which this calculation is based.)

The number of the Registrant’s shares of common stock outstanding was 11,221,405 as of March 2, 2015.

Thenumber of the Registrant’s shares of common stock outstanding was 11,569,692 as of February 28, 2018.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 20152018 annual stockholders’ meeting are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Reportannual report on Form10-K.

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item

No.

         Page      
No.
     Page
No.

PART I

PART I

PART I

1.

 

Business

  3  Business  3

1A.

 

Risk Factors

  10  Risk Factors  11

1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  21  Unresolved Staff Comments  23

2.

 

Properties

  21  Properties  23

3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  21  Legal Proceedings  23

4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

  21  Mine Safety Disclosures  23

PART II

PART II

PART II

5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  22  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  24

6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  24  Selected Financial Data  26

7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  25  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  27

7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  40  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  42

8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  40  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  42

9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  40  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  42

9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  41  Controls and Procedures  43

9B.

 

Other Information

  41  Other Information  43

PART III

PART III

PART III

10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  42  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance  44

11.

 

Executive Compensation

  42  Executive Compensation  44

12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  42  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  44

13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  42  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence  44

14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

  42  Principal Accountant Fees and Services  44

PART IV

PART IV

PART IV

15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

  43  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules  45

16.

  Form10-K Summary  46
 

Signatures

  45  Signatures  47

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  F-2  Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  F-2
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and 2013

  F-4  Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016  F-4
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

  F-5  Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015  F-5
 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

  F-6  Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015  F-6
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

  F-7  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015  F-7
 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  F-8  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  F-8

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

All schedules have been omitted because the required information for such schedules is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements.


PART I

Item 1. Business.

Organization

Reis, Inc. is a Maryland corporation. When we refer to “Reis” or the “Company,” we are referring to Reis, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company provides commercial real estate market information and analytical tools to real estate professionals, through its Reis Services subsidiary. For disclosure and financial reporting purposes, this business is referred to as the Reis Services segment.

Business

Reis Services

Reis Services, including its predecessors, was founded in 1980.

Business

The Company provides commercial real estate (“CRE”) market information and analytical tools to real estate professionals. Reis maintains a proprietary database containing detailedof information on all commercial properties in metropolitan markets and neighborhoods throughout the U.S. The database containsThis information on apartment, office, retail, warehouse/distribution, flex/research & development, self storage and seniors housing properties, and is used by real estateCRE investors, lenders and other professionals to make informed buying, selling and financing decisions. In addition, Reis data is used by debt and equity investors to assess, quantify and manage the risks of default and loss associated with individual mortgages, properties, portfolios and real estate backed securities. Reis currently provides its information services to many of the nation’s leading lending institutions, equity investors, brokers and appraisers.

Reis’s database and analytical tools have historically covered the nine key property types most important to real estate professionals focused on the U.S. CRE market (apartment, office, retail, warehouse/distribution, flex/research & development, self storage, seniors housing, student housing and affordable housing), providing up to 38 years of trend analysis and market forecasts for up to 275 metropolitan markets and thousands of submarkets. With the completion of a multi-year initiative to expand upon this cornerstone asset, Reis now offers market information, transaction data and building insights for all commercial properties throughout the nation, regardless of location, size, or use type. The achievement of “Every Property, Everywhere” positions Reis to serve all CRE professionals anduse-cases both within and beyond the Company’s traditional property types and coverage boundaries. In parallel with the development of “Every Property, Everywhere,” the Company has also built a new Application Programming Interface (“API”), a delivery system that embeds Reis’s data (legacy and newly launched) into any client’s and prospect’s internal system, regardless of platform.

Product Overview

The Company’s product portfolio features:featuresReis SE, its flagship delivery platform aimed at larger andmid-sized enterprises; enterprises. Other products include:ReisReports, aimed at prosumers and smaller enterprises; andMobiussReis Portfolio CREor Mobiuss,and other portfolio support products and services,aimed primarily at risk managers and credit administrators at banks andnon-bank lending institutions.institutions; andReisReports, aimed at prosumers and smaller enterprises. It is through these products that Reis providesReisprovides online access to a proprietary database of commercial real estate information and analytical tools designed to facilitate debt and equity transactions as well as ongoing asset and portfolio evaluations.

Depending on the product or level of entitlement, users have access to market trends and forecasts at metropolitan and neighborhood levels throughout the U.S. and/or detailed building-specific information such as rents, vacancy rates, lease terms, property sales, new construction listings, property valuation estimates and property valuation estimates.level tax information. Reis’s products are designed to meet the demand for timely and accurate information to support the decision making of property owners, developers, builders, banks andnon-bank lenders, equity investors and service providers. These real estate professionals require access to timely information on both the performance and pricing of assets, including detailed data on market transactions, supply, absorption, rents and sale prices. This information is critical to all aspects of valuing assets and financing their acquisition, development and construction.

Industry Dynamics

The sizeU.S. CRE market, a multi-trillion-dollar asset class, is expected to see healthy, prolonged growth in 2018 and beyond.1 Both U.S. CRE and the overall economy are poised for a steady expansion, in lockstep with a brightening outlook for other large economies. U.S. GDP and employment figures for 2017 suggest slightly faster growth relative to the prior five years, and the passage of the U.S. commercial real estate (“CRE”) market is estimated at $6.7 trillion; approximately 30% of annual transaction volume is driven by institutionalTax Bill appears to have stoked optimism for U.S. CRE and other asset classes. The new administration’s forthcoming changes to tax, trade, and infrastructure policies have proven popular among equity investors, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average reaching four1,000-point

1. Projections call for“Emerging Trends in Real Estate: United States and Canada”, Urban Land Institute, 2018.

https://americas.uli.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/125/ULI-Documents/EmergingTrendsInRealEstate2018.pdf

milestones in 2017. Given this economic environment, we believe that select U.S. CRE markets will continue to see strong incoming capital flows, as both foreign and domestic investors seek reliable yields.

Significant increases in investment, trade, and industrial production are expected to contribute to a healthy international outlook in 2018. Notable participants in the U.S. CRE market, to grow to $10.7 trillion, an increase of approximately 60%, by 2022including Japan and China, have seen upward revisions in projected growth.2. The relative health Given China’s strengthening outlook, we expect Chinese investment in U.S. CRE to continue to expand, attracting at least as much foreign capital as the prior year.

Still, CRE market participants continue to anticipate cyclical turbulence in specific multifamily, office, and retail markets. In response, investors have reallocated capital to CRE asset classes such as the warehouse/distribution sector. Incoming structural changes, including the discontinuance of LIBOR and the introduction of the domestic economy is expected to entice an increasing numberFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Current Expected Credit Loss Model (“CECL”) regulation will compel a wide swath of market participants lookingto adapt. These conditions heighten CRE professionals’ needs for a safe havenreliable data, market intelligence, and portfolio surveillance tools. Reis’s suite of products and services are uniquely positioned to invest inbe responsive to this increased focus on market trends and forecasts.

Demand for Data and Analytical Tools

CRE professionals have historically lacked the U.S., while economic growth abroad has weakened in many places. Europe remains in turmoil, stymied by weak demand and high debt levels. Other major economies like China, Japan, Russia and Brazil have exhibited disappointing growth figures for various reasons. In contrast, U.S. GDP growth has been strong and payroll expansion is accelerating. With both occupancies and rental rates rising for most property types, the U.S. CRE market is expected to remain a significant draw for investors.

Traditionally, investors and other professionals in the CRE market have been less data intensive and analytical comparedtools available to their peers in other asset classes. This is changing rapidly, as varied market participants demand timelyWith changes in the regulatory climate and highly disaggregated data and analytics to support all aspects of decision making throughout the commercial real estate lifecycle. Market professionals, such as property owners, developers and builders, banks and non-bank lenders, increasingly require access to information on supply, demand, asking and effective rents, lease terms, sales prices and detailed data on transactions. Reis has designed a suite of products and reports that are responsive to the decision support needs of CRE professionals during periods of healthy fundamentals and a high volume of transactions,other post-recession reforms, as well as during market downturns when valuationsthe continuing need to make well informed decisions, the demand for thorough and sales volumes are depressed.

1

Prudential Real Estate Investors: A Bird’s Eye View of Global Real Estate Markets: 2012 Update (February 2012).

2

Prudential Real Estate Investors: Why Global Real Estate Securities? (March 2013).

Since mid-2008,accurate CRE data has increased rapidly. The regulatory requirements (such asmark-to-market policies, Basel II and Basel III)III capital requirements, and guidance from theFASB, Federal Reserve and FDIC guidelines and other measures) have increased the need among regulated banks for market and portfolio monitoring. These requirements have generated demandmonitoring for accurate and timely information, as well as access to valuation tools to evaluate the underlying collateral supporting mortgages and mortgage-related securities.CRE professionals. For example, example:

the Federal Reserve conducts an annual exercise known as the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR”) in which financial institutions conduct stress tests using downside economic and market scenarios from which they develop capital allocations and reserves. In addition, there has been reserves;

the FASB’s CECL requires preparers to provide documentation and internal support surrounding their expected credit loss models;

increasing interest among REITs and other equity investors to monitor and update the net asset values of the commercial real estate in their portfolios. There is also heightened interest for CRE market informationportfolios; and analytics by

corporations, in response to the increasing prominenceconcentrations of commercial real estate assets on their balance sheets, and the prospect ofmust meet additional disclosure requirements that may be requiredimposed by the FASB and IASB.

Reis’sThese requirements have generated demand for accurate and timely information, as well as access to valuation tools to evaluate the underlying collateral supporting mortgages and mortgage-related securities. CRE professionals demand relevant market and transaction data to support effective decision-making and financial reporting throughout all stages of the commercial real estate transaction lifecycle. Access to information on supply, demand, asking and effective rents, lease terms, sales prices, new construction, cap rates and other detailed data across large and small metro areas is sought by property owners, developers, banks,non-bank lenders, brokers and asset managers across the country. To meet the growing demand for data and forecasts indicatecustom analytics, Reis has designed a generally improving U.S. CRE market that will continue to strengthen over at least the next five years and encourage heightened levelssuite of development, finance and transaction activity. The multifamily market has been on a torrid pace of construction, and though the supply pipeline continues to increase, demand is not expected to plummet anytime soon. Industrial market fundamentals are showing signs of strength, bolstered by firms building out their e-commerce capabilities. The office market remains in recovery mode, but fundamentals are improving and certain pockets of the country, particularly metropolitan areas with high concentrations of technology and business service firms, are performing extremely well. Retail is contending with oversupply and competition from e-commerce, but fundamentals are slowly improving and will benefit from the recent acceleration in job and income growth. Stabilizing products and/or tightening occupancies and rising rents and prices across all property types will generate higher volumes of underwriting, valuation and acquisition due diligence and stimulate increasing demand for Reis’s products.customized reports.

Operations

As commercial real estate markets grow in size and complexity, Reis continues to invest in the databases, technologies, intellectual capitalproperty and personnel critical to supporting the information needs of commercial real estate professionals. Specifically, Reis has:

 

developed expertise in data collection across multiple markets and property types;

 

invested in the analytical expertise to develop decision support systems that generate market trends and forecasts, property valuations, credit analytics, transaction support and risk management;

 

created product development expertise to collect market feedback and translate it into new products and reports; and

 

invested in a robust technology infrastructure to disseminate these tools to thea wide varietyarray of market participants.

2  “World Economic Outlook, October 2017”, IMF, 2017.

http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2017/09/19/~/media/Files/Publications/WEO/2017/October/pdf/main-chapter/c1.ashx

These investments have established Reis as a leading provider of commercial real estate information and analytical tools to the investment community. Reis continues to develop and introduce new products, expand and add new markets and data, and find new ways to deliver existing information to meet client demand, as more fully described below under “— Products and Services.” The depth and breadth of Reis’s data and expertise are critical in allowing Reis to grow its business.

Proprietary Databases

Reis develops and maintains three highly curated, proprietary databases which include information on (1) property performance, (2) new construction and (3) sales comparables.transactions. The significant characteristics of the Reis databases include:

 

Breadth - coverage of sevenall U.S. commercial properties, regardless of property type; historical trends and analytics for nine key investment property types including apartment, office, retail, warehouse/distribution, flex/research & development, self storage, seniors housing, student housing and seniorsaffordable housing properties;

 

Geography - national– coverage of all U.S. commercial properties, regardless of location; for the nine property types, coverage of up to 275 of the largest U.S. metropolitan CRE markets, over 7,000approximately 7,700 discrete market areas and segments with submarket boundaries proprietary to Reis;

 

Depth - captures critical information such as occupancies, rents, rent discounts, tenant improvement allowances, lease terms, expenses, buyer, seller, purchase price, capitalization rate, financing details and other key factors;

 

History - up to 3538 years of data through multiple cycles of economic/market peaks and troughs; and

 

Frequency - market and submarket reports available quarterly, monthly, or quarterlyfor rent comparables in certain sectors, daily, and sales comparables and new construction information updated on daily and weekly schedules.

Reis’s long-standing relationships with thousands of data sources, including building owners, property managers and agents, represent a unique and highly valuable asset that benefits from decades of investment. The Company is recognized by the industry and the business and trade press as the premier source of objective, timely and granular market information, a reputation attributable to two key factors: (1) Reis is viewed as independent as it does not compete as a broker in the listings space; and (2) Reis information is used by owners and managers in the underwriting, due diligence and marketing of properties, mortgages and real estate backed securities at both the single asset and portfolio levels.

The following table lists the number of metropolitan markets for each of the sevennine primary types of commercial real estate covered by Reis:Reis in the property performance database and new construction database:

 

        December 31,          December 31,  December 31,
      2014            2013        2017  2016

Apartment

 275  275   275  275

Office

  190  190

Retail

 190  190   190  190

Office

 190  190 

Warehouse/distribution

 47  47 

Flex/research & development

 47  47 

Self storage

 50  50 

Self storage (1)

    50    50

Warehouse/distribution (2)

    47    47

Flex/research & development (2)

    47    47

Seniors housing

 57      110  110

Student housing

  200  200

Affordable housing

  110

 

    45

 

(1) Increased to 125 markets as of March 1, 2018.

(1) Increased to 125 markets as of March 1, 2018.

  

(2) Expected doubling of coverage in late 2018.

(2) Expected doubling of coverage in late 2018.

  

Recent Database Enhancements

Reis programmatically expandsis continually expanding its property level and market coverage by geography and property type. During 2014,In August 2016, Reis introduced coverage on its seventhninth property type, seniorsaffordable housing, with information on 176 counties in 5745 metropolitan areas and in February 2015,2017, expanded coverage of this coverage by adding an additional 53property type to include information on 256 counties in 110 metropolitan areas, bringingareas. During 2017, Reis enhanced its coverageproperty comparables reports in the seniors housing asset class to 110 markets. In May 2015, Reis will introduce coverage on its eighth property type,retail, student housing, and self storage sectors consistent with many of the enhancements made in 2016 to its apartment property comparables reports and its office property comparables reports. These enhancements include licensed photographs, sector-specific details, contact information, sales transaction history, and numerous illustrative charts and graphs, all to fortify Reis’s position as the preferred source for comparables information among all real estate professionals involved in buying, selling, leasing, or managing real estate assets. Reis expects to introduce two additionaladd similar details to property level reports in other sectors, while also introducing

high level analytical modules that take a broader perspective across markets and geographies. During April 2017, Reis enhanced its “Market Analytics” module, a tool that empowers portfolio managers andC-level executives to look for market opportunities based on Reis’s forecasts at the market and submarket level. In September 2016, Reis expanded its commercial real estate sales transactions database to include virtually all U.S. markets and property types, medical office buildingsregardless of geography or sector (“Every Sale, Everywhere”). In the third quarter of 2017, Reis added land transactions to this database which includes history across virtually all U.S. counties for land transactions, as well as other information such as parcel boundaries and affordable housing, which will bring our offeringtaxes. In February 2018, Reis announced the expansion of coverage to upinclude every commercially zoned structure and land parcel in the nation, regardless of location, size or use type (“Every Property, Everywhere”). Also, as of March 1, 2018, Reis announced the increase to 10 distinct property types.its detailed coverage of the self storage sector to 125 markets. Additional development plans for 2018 include an expected doubling of coverage of industrial markets to approximately 100 markets later in 2018.

Property Performance Database – “Every Property, Everywhere”

Reis’s core property performance database contains information on competitive, income-producing properties in the U.S. apartment, office, retail, office, warehouse/distribution, flex/research & development, self storage, seniors housing, student housing and seniorsaffordable housing sectors. On an ongoing basis, Reis surveys and receives data downloads from building owners, leasing agents and managers which include key building performance statistics including, among others: occupancy rates; rents; rent discounts and other concessions; tenant improvement allowances; lease terms; and operating expenses. In addition, Reis processes multiple data sources on commercial real estate, including: public filings databases; tax assessor records; deed transfers; planning boards; and numerous local, regional and national publications and commercial real estate websites. Reis screens and assembles large volumes of data into integrated supply and demand trends on a monthly basis at the neighborhood (submarket) and metropolitan market levels. All collected data are subjected to a rigorous quality assurance and validation process developed over many years. At the property level, surveyors compare the data collected in the current period with data previously collected on that property and similar properties. If any unusual changes in rents and vacancies are identified,follow-up procedures are performed for verification or clarification of the results. All aggregate market data at the submarket and market levels are also subjected to comprehensive quality controls.

New Construction Database

In addition to its core property database, Reis develops and maintains a new construction database that identifies and monitors projects that are being added to our covered markets. Detailed tracking of the supply side of the commercial real estate market is critical to projecting performance changes at the market and submarket levels. This database is updated weekly and reports relevant information such as project size, property type, location, status, and estimated completion dates for projects that are planned, proposed or under construction.

Sales Transactions Database – “Every Sale, Everywhere”

Over the past three years, Reis also maintainshas made it a priority to expand and improve its sales comparablestransactions database. In September 2016, Reis expanded its commercial real estate sales transactions database containingto include virtually all U.S. markets and property types, regardless of geography or sector. This was followed up with the third quarter 2017 addition of land transactions, including history across virtually all U.S. counties, as well as other information such as parcel boundaries and taxes. This enhanced offering appeals to mortgage and property originators and underwriters, investment sales brokers, tax assessors, tax appeal firms, appraisers, and any other real estate professionals seeking the most comprehensive database of CRE transactions to source deals, search for related business, conduct due diligence or gain a competitive edge with market intelligence. Reis’s sales transactions database includes key structural data points, including but not limited to address, land use code, parcel number, and lot size, in upaddition to 277 metropolitan markets. The database captures key information on each transaction,transactional data points, such as buyer and seller purchasename, sale price, capitalization ratesale date, deed reference, and financing details wherewhen available, for transactions valued at greater than $250,000 in each market we cover, for our seven current property types, as well as for hotel properties.

Reis’s long-standing relationships with thousands of data sources, including building owners, property managersother desirable datapoints and agents, represent a unique and highly valuable asset that has required decades of investment. The Company is recognized by the industry and the business and trade press as the premier source of objective, timely and granular market information, a reputation attributable to several factors: (1) Reis is viewed as independent as it does not compete as a broker in the listings space; and (2) Reis information is used by owners and managers in the underwriting, due diligence and marketing of properties, mortgages and real estate backed securities at both the single asset and portfolio levels.licensed photographs.

Products and Services

Reis has invested in a robust technology infrastructure to disseminate a number of market information products to meet the demands of a wide variety of commercial real estate professionals, from large financial institutions seeking an integrated commercial real estate portfolio management platform, to a single access user seeking local market intelligence. Reis is committed to consistently upgrading and expanding its product offering to reach new markets and new types of consumers of commercial real estate information.

Reis SE

Reis SE (“(or sometimes referred to as “Reis Subscriber Edition”), available atwww.reis.com, is the Company’s flagship product, designed to assist in market research, due diligence and support of commercial real estate transactions, including loan originations, underwriting, acquisitions, risk assessment (such as loan loss reserves and impairment analyses), portfolio monitoring, asset management and appraisal. Reports are retrievable by street address, property type (apartment, office, retail, warehouse/distribution, flex/research &

development, self storage, seniors housing, student housing and seniorsaffordable housing) or on the market/submarket level and are available as full color, presentation quality documents or in spreadsheet formats.

Key features ofReis SEinclude:

 

Market Reports - On a monthly basis, Reis provides updated trends and forecasts of rent, vacancy, and inventory for apartment, office, retail, warehouse/distribution, flex/research & development, self storage, seniors housing, student housing and seniorsaffordable housing property types in up to 275 metropolitan areas and more than 7,000approximately 7,700 discrete market areas and segments.

 

Rent Comparables - Based on a user specified area, Reis supplies property level performance data such as rents and vacancies, as well as compcomparable group summary statistics, including concessions, operating expenses and lease terms.

 

Sales Comparables - Reis-Reis maintains a sales comparablestransactions database containing transactions in up to 277 metropolitan areas.including virtually all U.S. markets and property types. The database captures key information on each transaction, such as buyer, seller, purchase price, capitalization rate and financing details, where available, for transactions valued at greater than $250,000, for our seven current property types, as well as for hotel properties.available.

 

Construction Comparables - Reis monitors new projects from the planning stages to opening day to stabilization, capturing the anticipated effect of new competitive inventory on local supply and demand dynamics.

 

Property Lookup – For virtually any commercially zoned property or parcel anywhere in the nation, Property Lookup assembles into a brief report all relevant structural, transactional, locational, and performance information from the Reis database.

Single Property Valuation - Designed-Designed to help clients quantify the value and risk associated with their commercial real estate holdings, the valuation module utilizes three valuation methods – discounted cash flow, direct capitalization and sales price per square foot – supported by comparable transactions in the local market.market or submarket.

Executive Briefings - Comprehensive summaries that take the form of an analyst’swrite-up for hundreds of metropolitan areas, thousands of submarkets, and tens of thousands of individual properties. What a real estate analyst could take days preparing, Reis can generate in seconds.

 

“First Glance” Reports - Quarterly-Quarterly narrative reports provide an early assessment of the apartment, office, retail and industrial sectors across the U.S. and commentary on new construction activity.

 

Quarterly Briefings - Two conference calls each quarter attended by hundreds of Reis subscribers, plus members of the media, during which Reis economists provide an overview of the latest high-level findings and forecasts for the commercial real estate space and capital markets.

 

Real Estate News and Commentary - “Executive Briefings,” theThe Reis “Observer” and news stories selected by Reis analysts from among hundreds of sources to provide news relevant to a particular market and property type.

 

Email Alerts - Customizable-Customizable email alerts that let users receive proactive updates on markets of interest.interest, recent sales transactions and new construction activity.

Access toReis SEis by secure password and can be customized to accommodate the geographic coverage, property type and analytical needs of subscribers. For example, the product can be tailored to provide access to all or only selected markets, property types and report combinations.

ReisReportsReis Portfolio CRE and Other Portfolio Support Products and Services

ReisReports is a product tailored to meet the needs of smaller enterprises and individuals, professional investors, brokers and appraisers, available atwww.ReisReports.com. Although providing subscribers with less content and a more limited number of reports,ReisReports utilizes the same proprietary database that supportsReis SE. ReisReports is available on a monthly or annual subscription basis at affordable price points.

The addressable subscriber market forReisReports includes hundreds of thousands of prosumers and small enterprises. To expand the total user base ofReisReports, the Company markets through various traditional and online media channels. Management believes that there is a significant opportunity to market monthly and annual subscriptions to CRE professionals active in individual metropolitan areas.

Mobiuss Portfolio CRE

Launched in the first quarter of 2013,Mobiussenables clients to quickly and thoroughly assess portfolio risks and opportunities by integrating client loan and property information with Reis property and submarket data and third partywhich is processed through a credit analytics.model. The solution is delivered in aweb-based, visually engaging interface.MobiussReis Portfolio CREis targeted to both debt and equity capital providers active in U.S. commercial real estate and, specifically, to banks with significant CRE loan exposure.

As a loan-level analysis and surveillance platform,MobiussReis Portfolio CREenables property valuation, credit analysis, stress testing, benchmarking and portfolio pricing. In addition to providing credit default metrics such as expected losses and probabilities of default at the loan and portfolio levels, outputs include forecasted collateral operating incomes and values under multiple economic scenarios. These features allow clients to integrate internal data to create customizable scenario forecasts to meet regulatory stress testing requirements, set loan loss reserves and monitor their collateral.

TheMobiussReis Portfolio CREplatform is intended for both large and small lending institutions, Commercial Mortgage Backed Security, or CMBS, investors and equity investors, among others.MobiussReis Portfolio CREhas been designed in a modular fashion that allows banks of varying asset sizes to select the applications and price points most appropriate to the scale of their CRE portfolios.

ThroughReis Portfolio CRE, the Company intends to be able to support lenders as they prepare for the 2020 adoption of new accounting requirements by the FASB referred to as the CECL.

The Company has been able to assist financial institutions in the evaluation of their CRE loan portfolios through other means besidesReis Portfolio CRE,including custom data deliverables and providing dataclean-up, advisory and other consulting services. Reis stands ready to assist all financial services firms and other real estate professionals however they need information or services.

Application Programming Interface (“API”)

During the second quarter of 2017, Reis completed development of an Application Programming Interface, commonly referred to as an API. The API is a system that allows firms to receive Reis data elements directly into internal systems without going throughReis SE. For Reis, the strategic importance of the API is threefold. First, the opportunity to deliver Reis data directly into an institution’s internal systems appeals to the contract signers and executives responsible for maximizing the productivity of originators, underwriters, or analysts, eliminating the need to manuallyre-key data onto internal forms. Second, the API integrates Reis data into clients’ processes to increase adoption and heighten the probability of longer-term contractual relationships. Finally, Reis’s API is responsive to many of the challenges and opportunities stimulated by Fintech and related technologies, as well as heightened regulatory scrutiny. Eligible users of the API include existingReis SE subscribers, large financial institutions, business information firms, and Fintechstart-ups operating in tangential vertical markets.

ReisReports

ReisReports is a product tailored to meet the needs of smaller enterprises and individuals, professional investors, brokers and appraisers, available atwww.ReisReports.com. Although providing subscribers with less content and a more limited number of reports,ReisReports utilizes the same proprietary database that supportsReis SE.ReisReports is available on a monthly or annual subscription basis at affordable price points.

Data Redistribution / Marketing Alliances

The Company has established data redistribution agreements with information service providers as part of a strategy designed to raise brand awareness and generate sales leads for Reis’s information and services. Over time, third party users may enter into agreements with Reis directly in order to gain access to the full suite of reports and analytical modules. The Company’s data redistribution agreements are typically multi-year contracts in length, do not afford access to Reis’s proprietary database and provide limited views of Reis’s market data. Reis has also established marketing alliances with the Appraisal Institute, the Certified Commercial Investment Member Institute (“CCIM”) and Building Owners and Managers Association (“BOMA”) International to promoteReisReports to its members through discounts, e-mail outreach, website advertising and newsletter ads.

As an example, our data redistribution arrangement with Bloomberg allows for Bloomberg Professional subscribers to have access to Reis’s market information at {REIS < GO > } which is also integrated across property and credit valuation tools on Bloomberg’s Commercial Mortgage Backed Security (“CMBS”) product. Bloomberg subscribers can access Reis’s proprietary supply, demand and price data for the nation’s largest metropolitan apartment, office, retail and industrial markets.

Cost of Service

Reis’s data is made available in six ways, with price points that are reflective of the level of content being made available:

 

  

annual and multi-year subscriptions toReis SE ranging in price from $1,000 to overin excess of $1,000,000, depending upon the subscriber’s line of business and the combination of markets, property types and reports subscribed to, for which the subscriber is typically allowed to download an unlimited number of reports over the subscription period;to; renewals forReis SE are negotiated in advance of the expiration of an existing contract based on factors such as a subscriber’s historical and projected report consumption;

 

  

annual and multi-year subscriptions toMobiussReis Portfolio CREtypically ranging in price from the low tens of thousands of dollars into the hundreds of thousands of dollars;

annual and multi-year subscriptions to the Reis API,which can range in price from the low tens of thousands of dollars into the hundreds of thousands of dollars, depending on the amount of data and the number of elements being provided;

 

  

cappedReis SEsubscriptions typically ranging in price from $1,000 to $25,000, allowing clients to download a fixed retail value of reports over a period of up to twelve months;

 

custom data deliverables ranging in price from $1,000 for a specific data element to hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars for custom data deliveries, portfolio valuation and credit analysis; and

  

subscriptions toReisReports, which are charged to a credit card, having a retail price in the low hundreds of dollars per month, depending on the level of service subscribed to (monthly or annual pricing options are available);

custom data deliverables ranging in price from $1,000 for a specific data element to hundreds of thousands of dollars for custom portfolio valuation and credit analysis; and

 

individual reports, which can be purchased with a credit card, having retail prices up to $999 per report, are available to anyone who visits Reis’s retail website or contacts Reis via telephone, fax or email; however, certain reports are only available with an annual subscription or capped subscription account.

Reis’s revenue model is based primarily on annual subscriptions that are paid in accordance with contractual billing terms. Reis recognizes revenue from its subscription contracts on a ratable basis; for example,one-twelfth of the value of aone-year contract is recognized monthly. In the case of custom data deliverables, revenue is recognized upon completion and delivery to the customers, provided that no significant Company obligations remain.

Subscribers

At December 31, 2014, Reis had approximately 1,000 enterprise subscribers under signedenters into contracts with customers for all of its coreReis SEproduct.subscription based products and services. A subscribing entity may have one or many users entitled to accessReis SE. Nearly all of ourMobiussReis Portfolio CREsubscribers are alsoReis SE subscribers. These numbers do not include users who pay for individual reports by credit card, subscribers to ourReisReports product or users of information available on third party platforms through our data redistribution relationships.

The vast majority of the Company’s largest subscribers have utilized Reis’s core product for many years and have represented a stable user and revenue base. Subscribers include banking institutions, property owners, brokers, lessors, builders, REITs, pension funds, insurance companies, developers, commercial banks,non-bank lenders, equity investors, appraisers, accountants, consultants, academia, and government institutions. At December 31, 2014,2017, approximately 79% of Reis’sReis SE customers (based on total customer dollars) are debt and equity capital providers, with banks and other financial institutions comprising approximately 54%53% and investment funds and equity owners comprising approximately 25%26%; service providers account for the remaining 21%.

Customer Service and Training

Reis focuses intensively on proactive training and customer support. Reis’s customer service team offers customizedon-site training andweb-based and telephonic support, as well as weeklyweb-based training seminars open to allReis SEsubscribers. The corporate training team also visits with a large proportion ofReis SE subscribers on an ongoing basis. Additional points of subscriber contact includemid-year service reviews, aweb-based subscriber feedback program and account manager visits. All of these contacts are used to assist subscribers with their utilization ofReis SEand identify opportunities for product adoption and increased usage and to solicit subscriber input for future product enhancements. Similarly, support and training are available to ourReisReports andMobiussReis Portfolio CREsubscribers.

Proprietary Rights

To protect our proprietary rights, we rely upon a combination of:

 

trade secret, copyright, trademark, database protection and other laws at the Federal, state and local levels;

 

non-disclosure,non-competition and other contractual provisions with employees, vendors and consultants;

 

restrictive license agreements with subscribers; and

 

other technical measures.

We protect our software’s source code and our databases as either trade secrets or under copyright law. We license our services under license agreements that restrict the disclosure and use of our proprietary information and prohibit the unauthorized reproduction,re-engineering or transfer of the information in our products and services.Non-renewing subscribers are required to destroy any copies of our data.

We also protect the secrecy of our proprietary databases, our trade secrets and our proprietary information through confidentiality andnon-competition agreements with our employees, vendors and consultants. Our services also include technical measures designed to detect unauthorized copying of our intellectual property. The Company’s compliance department monitors usage to ensure that all client usage is consistent with the terms of its contract.contract and has created analytic and other forensic tools to identify unauthorized access toReis SE as a result of password migration and sharing. From time to time the Company has and may take legal action to enforce our intellectual property and proprietary rights.

We have registered the trademarks for “Reis,” “Reis Reports,” the Reis logo and “Your Window Onto the Real Estate Market.”

Competition

Despite its multi-trillion dollar size, the commercial real estate industry continues to be underserved by information resources. Compared to equity and fixed income professionals, CRE practitioners have fewer options in meeting their market information and analytical needs. The disparity in available information resources is due, in part, to the limited reporting requirements imposed on private CRE firms which represent the majority of the industry. However, real estate transactions involve multiple participants who all require accurate historical and current market information. Therefore, in order to provide comprehensive and value-added products for all CRE practitioners, a database of commercial properties must be largely built from proprietary sources over many years. Key

factors that influence the competitive position of commercial real estate information vendors include: the depth and breadth of underlying databases; ease of use; flexibility and functionality of the customer interface; the ability to keep the dataup-to-date and accurate; frequency of reporting; scope of coverage by geography and property type; customer training and support; adoption of the service by industry leaders; consistent product innovation; recognition by general business and trade media; and price.

Reis’s senior management believes that, on a national level, only a small number of firms serve the market information needs of U.S. commercial real estate investors and lenders. Reis competes directly and indirectly for subscribers with online services or websites targeted to commercial real estate professionals such as CoStar Group, Inc. (or “CoStar”) (including its Apartments.com, Property and Portfolio Research and LoopNet businesses), Real Capital Analytics, Inc., Xceligent,Axiometrics LLC, CBRE Econometric Realty Advisors, (formerly known as Torto Wheaton Research), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CB Richard Ellis, and, with respect toReis Portfolio CRE,Moody’s Analytics, Inc., as well as with various local and regional data providers covering selected markets andin-house real estate research departments. Another source of information has been market reports published by brokerage firms, although the promotional nature of many of these publications and their irregular publishing schedule make them less reliable as an ongoing resource for many CRE practitioners.

Discontinued Operations – Residential Development Activities

Prior to May 2007, the name of the Company was Wellsford Real Properties, Inc., which we refer to as Wellsford. (“Wellsford”). Wellsford, which was originally formed on January 8, 1997, acquired the Reis Services business by merger in May 2007 which we refer to as the Merger.(the “Merger”). Wellsford’s primary operating activities immediately prior to the Merger, and conducted through its subsidiaries, were the development, construction and sale of three residential projects and its approximate 23% ownership interest in the Reis Services business. The Company completed the sale of the remaining residential units and homes at its projects or divested of the remaining residential projects in bulk sales by April 2011. In 2012, the Company settled construction defect litigation at its Colorado project.project, and in 2015 finalized its efforts to recover funds from other responsible parties as more fully described in Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements, included in this annual report on Form10-K.

The Residential Development Activities, segment, including certain general and administrative costs that supported that segment’sthe related operations, arewere presented as a discontinued operation for 2015 and 2014 2013 and 2012.

See Note 3are presented in the Other segment. Discontinued operations were completed as of December 31, 2015; therefore there were no discontinued operations activities during the years ended December 31, 2017 and Note 10 of the consolidated financial statements, included in this filing, for additional information regarding the Company’s segments and the aforementioned litigation.2016.

Corporate Information

The Company’s executive offices are located at 530 Fifth1185 Avenue Fifthof the Americas, 30th Floor, New York, New York 10036; telephone: (212)921-1122; website:www.reis.com; email:investorrelations@reis.com. Please note that information on the Company’s website is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K filing.10-K.

The reports we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, including our annual report, quarterly reports and current reports, are available free of charge on our investor relations website (www.reis.com/investors) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. You may review and copy any of the information we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

The Company had 205268 full-time employees as of December 31, 2014.2017.

The Company is a Federal government contractor and an equal opportunity employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment and will not be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, age, disability, or protected veteran status. Reis takes affirmative action in support of its policy to employ and advance in employment individuals who are minorities, women, protected veterans, and individuals with disabilities.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report on Form10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may relate to the Company’s or management’s outlook or expectations for earnings, revenues, expenses, margins, asset quality, or other future financial or business performance, strategies, prospects or expectations, or the impact of legal, regulatory or supervisory matters on our business, operations or performance. Specifically, forward-looking statements may include:

 

statements relating to future services and product development of the Reis Services segment;our business;

statements relating to business prospects, potential acquisitions, sources and uses of cash, revenue, expenses, margins, net income, income (loss) from continuing or discontinued operations, cash flows, renewal rates, valuation of assets and liabilities and other business metrics of the Company and its businesses, including EBITDA (as defined below), Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract;Contract (as defined below); and

 

statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “target” or similar expressions relating to future periods.

Forward-looking statements reflect management’s judgment based on currently available information and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. With respect to these forward-looking statements, management has made certain assumptions. Future performance cannot be assured. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Some factors that could cause actual results to differ include:

 

lower than expected revenues and other performance measures such as net income, income from continuing operations, income before income taxes, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA;

 

inability to retain and increase the Company’s subscriber base;

 

inability to execute properly on new products and services, or failure of subscribers to accept these products and services;

 

competition;

 

inability to attract and retain sales and senior management personnel;

 

inability to access adequate capital to fund operations and investments in ourthe Company’s business;

 

difficulties in protecting the security, confidentiality, integrity and reliability of the Company’s data;

 

changes in accounting policies or practices;

 

legal and regulatory issues;

 

the results of pending, threatening or future litigation; and

 

the risk factors listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this annual report on Form10-K.

You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this annual report onForm 10-K. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect any events or circumstances after the date of this annual report onForm 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The following is a discussion of the risk factors that Reis’s management believes are material to Reis at this time. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing Reis and there may be additional matters that Reis is unaware of or that Reis currently considers immaterial. Any or all of these could adversely affect Reis’s business, results of operations, profitability, financial condition and cash flows.

Risks Related to the Reis Services Business and the Information Services Industry Generally

A failure to attract and retain subscribers could harm our business.

We must acquire new subscribers and expand our business with our current subscribers in order to grow our business.Our ability to grow our business will be adversely impacted to the extent that current subscribers reduce or discontinue the use of our products and websites, includingReis SE, Mobiuss andReisReports, or if we are unable to locate and have prospects subscribe toReis SE, Mobiuss our products and ReisReports. websites. This may occur due to budgetary constraints, which was particularly true during the heightprice of the economic downturn in 2008 and 2009,our services, or if our product offering is less competitive with those of other companies in our industry. Prior to 2008, our overall trailing twelve month

Our base renewal rates (renewal rates, excluding price increases) were above 94% for many years. In the latter part of 200887.1% and in 2009, we

experienced an overall decrease in the total number of our subscribers and a reduction in our trailing twelve month renewal rates. The overall trailing twelve month renewal rate fell to a low of 83% at September 30, 2009.

Our overall renewal rates were 87% and 91%81.6% for the trailing twelve months (“TTM”) ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, (for institutional subscribers,and the renewal rates were 89%rate, including price increases, was 88.3% and 93%85.7% for the trailing twelve monthsTTM ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013, respectively). The decline in the2016, respectively. Operationally, management may take steps to improve renewal rates reflects our decision to be more aggressive with our renewalby revising pricing policies, particularly in instances whereincreasing sales resources for maintaining existing customer usage levels are significantly greater than what was initially estimated as annual usagerelationships, improving the onboarding process for that customer. We believe that aligning client report consumption with appropriate annual fees, while remaining respectfulnewly contracted accounts, lengthening the terms of subscriber needcontracts or incorporating auto-renewal language (see Item 7 for Reismore information is more important in the long-term, than a modest decline in the currenton renewal rate. While management believes, based upon past experience, that many non-renewing customers ultimately renew with Reis as their information and analytic needs may not be fully addressed by competitive offerings, there is no certainty that non-renewing customers will ultimately renew with Reis.rates).

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in continuing to identify and sell to additional subscribers, expand business from our existing subscribers, renew existing subscribers, regainnon-renewing customers, or adopt policies or operational practices that will either maintain or increase our renewal rates.

Our revenues are concentrated among certain key subscribers.

We have approximately 1,000 enterprise subscribers toReis SE at December 31, 2014. The largest individual subscriber accounted for 2.9%4.4% and 3.4%6.3% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. If we were to experience a reduction or loss of business from a number of our largest subscribers, it could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and, depending on the significance of the loss, our profitability, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, although we generally impose contractual restrictions limiting our immediate exposure to revenue reductions due to mergers and consolidations among our subscribers and potential subscribers and our pricing model is based on actual and projected usage, we may be impacted by consolidation among our subscribers and potential subscribers, as a result of their reduced usage on a combined basis or greater bargaining power.

We may be unable to compete successfully with our current or future competitors.

The market for information, analytics and decision support services in general is highly competitive and rapidly changing. We compete with (1) local companies that offer commercial real estate research with respect to their specific geographic areas and (2) national companies that offer national commercial real estate research. Specifically, certain of our products compete with those of CoStar (including both its Apartments.com, Property and Portfolio Research and LoopNet businesses), Real Capital Analytics, Xceligent,Axiometrics, CBRE Econometric Realty Advisors and Moody’s. Some of our competitors, either alone or with affiliated entities, may have greater name recognition, larger subscriber bases or greater financial, technical or marketing resources than we have. Future competition may come from large digital enterprises seeking to enter the CRE information space. These enterprises could have access to significantly greater capital and technical expertise than Reis. At the same time, current and future competitors may seek to employ new technologies and approaches. Such innovations could potentially reduce the cost of data collection and analytics and improve the frequency and accuracy of CRE market information. Reis is also currently developing and completing emerging technologies to advance its data collection programs, improve products, and reduce costs; however, there can be no assurance that these efforts will be successful. In addition, some current or future competitors may be able to undertake more effective marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, and make more attractive offers to potential employees and business partners or respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies or changes in subscriber requirements.partners. Competition could negatively impact our revenues, profitability, financial condition and cash flows.

We may not be able to return to or maintain Reis Services’s historical rates of growth in revenues or EBITDA.growth. In addition, multi-year contracts may negatively impact our growth rates.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not grow Reis Services EBITDA or Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA on an annual basis over 2016 and revenue growth was a modest 1.4% in 2017 over 2016. Historically, Reis Services has experienced revenue and EBITDA growth (we define EBITDA as earnings (income(net income (loss) from continuing operations),) before discontinued operations, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Annual total revenue grew by 14.9% from 2011 to 2012, by 11.2% from 2012 to 2013, and by 19.0% from 2013 to 2014. On a pro forma basis, revenue grew by 12.8% from 2011 to 20122014, and by 13.2%23.1% from 20122014 to 2013 after consideration2015. During 2017, the Company experienced an improving quarterly trend over the course of certain pro forma itemsthe year. Revenue, which in 2012, as more fully describedthe first quarter of 2017 declined from the first quarter of 2016 by (5.4)% improved to slight growth in Item 7. Thethe second quarter of 2017 to 0.8% and accelerated to 4.8% in the third quarter of 2017 and 6.1% in the fourth quarter and annual 2014 revenue was the highest quarterly and annual revenue in the Company’s history. It also marks the 19th consecutive quarterly increase in revenueof 2017, over the prior year’s correspondingeach respective 2016 quarter. There can be no assurance that our revenues will continue to grow, grow at or in excess of the pace of our recent performance,actual growth rates from 2012 to 2015, on a consecutive quarter basis, on a year-over-year basis, or at all in the future.

Reis Services’s annual EBITDA grew by 17.8% from 2011 to 2012, by 12.1% from 2012 to 2013, and by 17.8% from 2013 to 2014. On a pro forma basis,2014, and by 31.0% from 2014 to 2015. During 2017, similar to the pattern of revenue growth, both Reis Services EBITDA grew by 12.5% from 2011and Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA experienced an improving quarterly trend over the course of the year. Reis Services EBITDA declined (38.9)% in the first quarter of 2017, the decline was reduced to 2012(15.2)% in the second quarter of 2017, with further improvement to growth of 19.4% in the third quarter of 2017, and by 17.3% from 2012acceleration to 2013, after consideration of certain pro forma items in 2012, as more fully described in Item 7. The62.4% for the fourth quarter of 2014 marks2017, as compared to each respective 2016 quarter. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA in 2017 declined (44.1)% and (15.3)% in the 17th consecutive quarterly increasefirst and second quarters of 2017, respectively, with growth of 13.7% and an acceleration to 63.8% growth in Reis Services EBITDA over the prior year’sthird and fourth quarters of 2017, respectively, as compared to each respective 2016 quarter. Expenses willmay increase in the future, including expenses for content maintenance, sales, marketing and product development, with the expectation that these expense increases will drive future revenue growth; however, such additional expenses could result in reduced margins or profitability, or negatively impact liquidity in the near term, and if not successful, may negatively impact margins, profitability and liquidity in the long term. There can be no assurance that future EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA for the Reis Services segment, or on a consolidated basis will continue to grow, grow at or in excess of

the actual growth pace of our recent performance,from 2012 to 2015, on a consecutive quarter basis, on a year-over-year basis, or at all. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or expand our EBITDA or EBITDA margins for the Reis Services segment, or on a consolidated basis, in the future. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA arenon-GAAP financial measures within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the SEC. See Item 7 for reconciliations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to the most comparable GAAP measure, income from continuing operations, for both the Reis Services segment and on a consolidated basis.

Management disaggregates total revenue into two components: “Subscription” and “Other.” Other revenue specifically includes revenue related to contracts forone-time custom data deliverables andone-time fees for settlements of previous unauthorized usage of Reis data. The Company recognized significant revenue in the second and fourth quarters of 2015 for custom data deliverables, as well as custom portfolio and advisory services, for one of our existingReis SE subscribers aggregating approximately $4,519,000 in 2015 (which is included in other revenue for 2015). These contracts called for a substantial volume of highly granular market, submarket and comparables data, as well as aone-time custom analysis of the institution’s commercial real estate portfolio. An additional delivery was made to this customer in February 2016 for which the Company recognized $1,200,000 as other revenue, positively impacting results for the first quarter of 2016. Although the Company believes that there could be additional opportunities to assist client andnon-client financial services firms and other real estate investors with evaluating the health of their real estate portfolios, there can be no assurance that subscribers will have demand forone-time custom data deliverables, and portfolio and advisory services.

Over the past threefew years, Reis has made a concerted effort to negotiate and enter intoencourage multi-year contracts, when appropriate, with terms of two or three years, and in some cases, four years. Securing customers into contracts greater than 12 months allows for a stable revenue base and increased revenue visibility (as measured by our level of reported deferred revenue and a relatednon-GAAP metric management utilizes which is referred to as Aggregate Revenue Under Contract (see Item 7 for more information on this performance metric)) and increased cash flow visibility, positively impacts our renewal rates and allows for a better allocation of account management and other personnel resources. However, multi-year subscriptions mute our revenue growth rates after the first year of the subscription. WeFor our subscription products we recognize revenue ratably over the related contractual period. Therefore, any increases in the price of the subscription after the first year of a multi-year contract are considered in the total amount being straight-lined over the contract term. On any given multi-year contract, the biggest revenue growth will be reflected in the 12 month period following a negotiated renewal, with no further revenue growth generated from that contract after the first year. Although our cash collection increases year-over-year, multi-year contracts have a flattening effect on our overall revenue growth rate. This would also similarly impact our EBITDA growth rates. As of December 31, 2014, we have subscriptions with2017, approximately 240 institutions signed to45% of revenue from our customers were under a multi-year deal.agreement.

If our growth rates decline, or if revenue and/or EBITDA decline, investors’ perceptions of our business may be adversely affected and the market price of our common stock could decline.

We must continue to obtain information from multiple sources.

The quality of our databases supporting our products depends substantially on information provided by a large number of sources, including commercial real estate brokers, agents and property owners, as well as from public sources, such as tax assessors, deed recorders, planning and zoning boards, corporate websites, the business and trade press, and selected third party vendors of business information. If we are unable to collect information from a significant number of these sources, or if the cost of collecting information becomes too expensive, our products could be negatively affected, potentially resulting in an increase in subscriber cancellations and a failure to acquire new subscribers.

Our revenues, expenses and operating results could be affected by general economic conditions or by changes in commercial real estate markets, which are cyclical.

Our business and the commercial real estate industry are sensitive to trends in the general economy and trends in local, regional and national commercial real estate markets, which are unpredictable. Therefore, our operating results, to the extent they reflect changes in

the broader commercial real estate industry, may be subject to significant fluctuations. A number of factors could have an effect on our revenues,revenue, expenses, profitability or cash flows, such as:

 

periods of economic slowdown or recession in the U.S., locally or locally;globally;

 

budgetary and financial burdens on our subscribers and potential subscribers;

 

mergers, acquisitions, failures or government takeovers of our subscribers and potential subscribers;

 

governmental intervention in economic policy;

 

inflation or deflation;

 

flows of capital into or out of real estate investment in the U.S. or various regions of the U.S.;

 

changes to the manner in which transactions are financed;

 

changes in the risk profile of real estate assets and collateral for financings;

 

changes or consolidation in the real estate industry;

 

changes in levels of rent, absorption, leasing activity or appreciation of asset values;

changingchanges in interest rates;

 

changes in Federal, state or local tax laws and regulations, including the Federal tax reform legislation enacted at the end of 2017, and the impact of such policies on transactions and commercial real estate values;

changes in, and the potential reform of other tax and accounting policies;

 

changes in the cost and availability of capital;

changes in regulatory requirements, laws, policies and other regulatory developments;

 

lower consumer confidence;

 

wage and salary levels;

 

war, terrorist attacks or natural disasters; or

 

the public perception that any of these events or conditions may occur.

If our subscribers choose not to use any of our products, including but not limited toReis SE, Mobiuss orReisReportsbecause of any of these factors, and we are not successful in attracting new subscribers, our revenues, expenses, EBITDA, margins, profitability, cash flows and/or stock price could be negatively affected.

Our success depends on our ability to introduce new or upgraded services or products.

To continue to attract new subscribers and renew our existing subscribers, we may need to introduce new products or services.services while expanding brand coverage. The need for new products and services may be in response to, or in anticipation of, changing or developing customer needs or preferences as well as to remain competitive with other providers of market information. We may choose to develop new products and services independently or to license or otherwise integrate content and data from or with third parties. The introduction of new products and services could impose costs on our business and require the use of resources, and there is no guarantee that we will continue to be able to access new content and technologies on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If subscribers or potential subscribers do not recognize the value of our new services or enhancements to existing services, our operating results could be negatively affected. We may incur significant costs and experience difficulties in developing and delivering these new or upgraded services or products.

Efforts to enhance and improve the ease of use, responsiveness, functionality and features of our existing and newly developed products and services have inherent risks, and we may not be able to manage these product developments and enhancements successfully or in a cost effective manner. If we are unable to continue to develop new or upgraded services or products, then subscribers may choose not

to use our products and services. Our growth and results of operations would be negatively impacted if we were unable to successfully market and sell any new services or upgrades.

OurDuring September 2015, Reis purchased the IP associated with theMobiussReis Portfolio CRE product is dependent uponplatform.    Revenue fromReis Portfolio CRE for contracts entered into after September 16, 2015 represents the activitiesCompany’s 100% share of another organization over which we do not exercise control.the value of the subscription, compared to the Company’s 50% share of subscription value prior to the purchase of theMobiussReis Portfolio CREIP. After completion of the transaction, Reis owns all of theReis Portfolio CRE has been developed with,IP, and is being co-marketed with an unrelated third party. TheMobiuss product is a combinationsolely responsible for any new functionality development, maintenance of Reis’s commercial real estate market informationthe system and forecasts with risk analyticsmarketing and web-based technologies provided by the unrelated third party. If this third party fails to devote the time, capital and resources to the continuing development and support of theMobiuss product, and if Reis cannot either replace them with another party or perform the functions for itself, sales ofMobiuss to new subscribers or the renewal of subscriptions to existingMobiuss subscribersinitiatives. Our operating results could be negatively impacted resulting in a reduction in revenue, and negatively impacting our EBITDA, margins, profitability and cash flows.affected if any of these efforts are not successful.

Our ReisReportsexisting product offerings, new product offerings in 2017 and Mobiuss offerings2018, or other future products, may not be successful or may not result in increased revenues, which may negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial position.

During 2015,2018, we expect to continue to expand our sales and marketing efforts in connection withrelated to all of our existing products, includingReis SE, ReisReportsandMobiussReis Portfolio CRE,as well as new product offerings in 2017 and 2018, and potential future new products, all of which could result in increased expenses.expenses.In 2017, Reis announced the launch of an API delivery platform and further enhancements to our sales comparables database to include land sales (building on the 2016 enhancements of covering every CRE transaction in the U.S.). In February 2018, we announced the release of millions of new records into our property performance database as part of our “Every Property, Everywhere” offering. During 2018, we intend to use these major enhancements to not only pursue new revenue opportunities with our existing subscribers, but also with other opportunities beyond our client base, including CRE investment sales brokers, appraisers, tax assessors and tax appeal firms who could all benefit from our significantly expanded property data, land and sales information and our API delivery platform. If our costs for these efforts exceed our expectations, our profitability and financial position could be adversely affected. In addition, if we incur additional costs to expand these products and we are not successful in marketing or selling these expanded services, this could have an adverse effect on our financial position by increasing our expenses without increasing our revenues, impacting margins, profitability and cash flows.

If we fail to protect confidential information against security breaches, or if subscribers are reluctant to use our products because of privacy concerns, we might experience a loss in profitability.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of use on our websites, as part of our subscriber registration process, we collect and use personally identifiable information. Industry-wide incidents or incidents with respect to our websites, including theft, alteration, deletion or misappropriation of information, security breaches, malevolent activities by computer hackers, viruses (or anything else that may contaminate or cause destruction to our systems), or changes in industry standards, regulations or laws could deter people from using the Internet or our websites to conduct transactions that involve the transmission of confidential information, which could harm our business. Under the laws of certain jurisdictions, if there is a breach of our computer systems and we know or suspect that unencrypted personal subscriber data has been stolen, we may be required to inform any subscribers whose data was stolen and we may be subjected to liability, which could harm our reputation and business.

Certain state laws require businesses that maintain personal information in electronic databases to implement reasonable measures to keep that information secure. Various states have enacted different and sometimes contradictory requirements for protecting personal information collected and maintained electronically. We may face adverse publicity if we are not able to comply with laws requiring us to take adequate measures to assure the confidentiality of the personally identifiable information that our subscribers have given to us. This could result in a loss of customers and revenue. Even if we are in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations, we still may face liability or disruption to our business if we do not comply in every instance or if the security of the customer data that we collect is compromised, regardless of whether our practices comply or not.

Our business could be harmed if we are unable to maintain the integrity and reliability of our data and forecasts.

Our success depends on our subscribers’ confidence in the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and reliability of the data and forecasts we provide. We believe that we take adequate precautions to safeguard the completeness and accuracy of our data and that the information is generally current, comprehensive and accurate. Nevertheless, we depend to a large degree on information provided to us on a voluntary basis by third parties, including commercial real estate brokers, agents and property owners. OurMobiuss product involves the delivery of portfolio analytics derived from the combined expertise of Reis and an unrelated third party; we are not in control of the unrelated third party’s technology, intellectual property or economic or financial models in connection with the delivery of its portion of theMobiuss product.owners, as well as public record data. Further, data is susceptible to electronic malfeasance including theft, alteration, deletion, viruses and malevolent activities by computer hackers. In addition, our reports and conference calls for the benefit of our subscribers may contain forecasts with respect to real estate trends. Although our contracts contain language limiting our liability if any of our data or forecasts are inaccurate or are later not borne out by actual results, for any of the above reasons, demand for our services could diminish and we may be exposed to lawsuits claiming damages resulting from inaccurate data and forecasts.

We may be unable to enforce or defend our ownership or use of intellectual property.

Our business depends in large measure on the intellectual property utilized in our methodologies, software and databases. We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret, database protection and copyright laws, registered domain names,non-disclosure,non-competition and other contractual provisions with employees, vendors and consultants,work-for-hire provisions, restrictive license agreements with subscribers and technical security measures to protect our proprietary intellectual property rights. However, we do not hold Federal registrations covering all of our trademarks and copyrightable materials. We also do not own any patents or patent applications. In addition, current law may not adequately protect our databases and data, and legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of proprietary rights in online businesses are uncertain and evolving. Our business could be significantly harmed if we do not continue to protect our intellectual property.

In addition, notwithstanding our efforts to protect our intellectual property, third parties may misappropriate our data through website scraping, robots or other means and aggregate this data on their websites with data from other companies. In addition, copycat websites may misappropriate data on our website and attempt to imitate the functionality of our website. We may not be able to detect all such websites in a timely manner and, even if we could, technological and legal measures may be insufficient to stop their operations. Available remedies

In protecting our intellectual property, we will enforce our rights against people and businesses that infringe our intellectual property, including through legal action. Taking such action may not be adequate to protect us againstcause the misappropriation of our data, and any measures that we may take could require usCompany to expend significant financial resources.resources, and we cannot ensure that such actions will be successful. Any unlawful use of our intellectual property, and subsequent legal action, could make it more expensive for us to do business and negatively impact Reis’s results of operations and financial condition.

We also could be significantly harmed if claims are made against us alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. Any intellectual property claims, regardless of merit, could be expensive to litigate or settle, and could require the expenditure of substantial amounts of time and/or money.

If our websites or other services experience system failures or malicious attacks, our subscribers may be dissatisfied and our operations could be impaired.

Our business depends upon the satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our websites. Problems with the websites could result in reduced demand for our services. Furthermore, the software underlying our services is complex and may contain undetected errors. Despite testing, we cannot be certain that errors will not be found in our software. Any errors could result in adverse publicity, impaired use of our services, loss of revenues, cost increases or legal claims by subscribers.

Additionally, our services substantially depend on systems provided by third party vendors and service providers, over whom we have little or no control. Interruptions in service could result from the failure of data providers, telecommunications providers, or other third parties, including due to break-ins, unauthorized access, computer viruses, vandalism, fire, floods, severe weather, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, terrorism, acts of war, and other similarly damaging events. We depend on these third party providers of Internet communication services to provide continuous and uninterrupted service. We also depend on Internet service providers that provide access to our services. Any disruption in the Internet access provided by third party providers or any failure of third party providers to handle higher volumes of user traffic could harm our business.

Our internal network infrastructure could be disrupted or penetrated, which could materially impact both our ability to provide services and subscribers’ confidence in our services.

Our operations depend upon our ability to maintain and protect our computer systems. While we believe that our systems, most of which are redundant and independent systems in separate locations, are adequate to support our operations, our systems may be vulnerable to damage frombreak-ins, unauthorized access, computer viruses, vandalism, fire, floods, severe weather, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, terrorism, acts of war, and other similarly damaging events. Although we maintain insurance against fires, floods, and general business interruptions, the amount and types of coverage may not be adequate in any particular case. Furthermore, any damage or disruption could materially impair or block our ability to provide services, which could significantly impact our business.

Experienced computer programmers, or hackers, may attempt to penetrate our network security from time to time. Although we have not experienced any security breaches to date and we maintain a firewall, a hacker who penetrates network security could misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in our services. We might be required to further expend significant capital and resources to protect against, or to alleviate, problems caused by hackers. We also may not have a timely remedy against a hacker who is able to penetrate our network security. In addition to purposeful security breaches, the inadvertent transmission of computer viruses or anything else manifesting contaminating or destructive properties could expose us to litigation or to a material risk of loss. Any of these incidents could materially impact our ability to provide services as well as materially impact the confidence of our subscribers in our services, either of which could significantly and adversely impact our business.

We may be subject to regulation of advertising and subscriber solicitation or other newly-adopted laws and regulations.

As part of our subscriber registration process, our subscribers agree to receive emails and other communications from us. In addition, we use email and other online marketing techniques to reach potential subscribers, particularly for ourReis SEandReisReports products.subscribers. We may be subject to restrictions on our ability to communicate through email and phone calls, even with existing subscribers. The U.S. and other jurisdictions have proposed or adopted laws that restrict or prohibit unsolicited email or spam. These laws may impose significant monetary penalties for violations. In addition, laws or regulations that could harm our business could be adopted, or reinterpreted so as to affect our activities, by Federal and state governments, regulatory agencies or foreign governments or agencies. This could include, for example, laws regulating the source, content or form of information provided on our websites, the information or services we provide, or our transmissions over the Internet. Violations or new interpretations of these laws or regulations may result in penalties, damage our reputation, increase our costs or make our services less attractive.

Litigation or governmental investigations in which we become involved may significantly increase our expenses and adversely affect our stock price.

From time to time, we are a party to various lawsuits. Any lawsuits, threatened lawsuits or governmental investigations in which we are involved could cost us a significant amount of time and money to defend, could distract management’s attention away from operating our business, could result in negative publicity and could adversely affect our stock price. In addition, if any claims are determined against us or if a settlement requires us to pay a large monetary amount or take other action that materially restricts our operations, our profitability could be significantly reduced and our financial position could be adversely affected. Our insurance may not be sufficient to cover any losses we incur in connection with litigation claims.

Reis develops and maintains three highly curated, proprietary databases of U.S. commercial real estate. On an ongoing basis, Reis surveys and receives data from building owners, leasing agents and managers, as well as from multiple other data sources.sources, including public record information. Nonetheless, we may be subject to legal liability for collecting, displaying or distributing information. We may also be subject to claims based on the content that is accessible from our website through links to other websites or information on our website supplied by third parties. We could also be subject to claims that the collection or provision of certain information breached laws and regulations relating to privacy and data protection. Even if these claims do not result in liability to us, we could incur significant costs in investigating and defending against any claims.

Our revenue, expenses, operating results, margins, financial condition and cash flows are subject to fluctuations.

Our revenues, expenses, operating results, margins, financial condition and cash flows have fluctuated in the past and are likely to continue to do so in the future. These fluctuations could negatively affect our results of operations during that period and future periods. Our revenues, expenses, operating results, margins, financial condition and cash flows may fluctuate from quarter-to-quarterquarter to quarter due to factors including, among others, those described below:

 

our ability to obtain new subscribers, retain existing subscribers and regainnon-renewing subscribers;

 

the number and dollar amount of contracts that are multi-year;

 

changes in our marketing or other corporate strategies;

 

changes in our pricing strategies;

 

our introduction of new products and services or changes to existing products and services;

 

the amount and timing of our operating expenses and capital expenditures;

 

changes in the volume, timing or price of custom data deliverables;

 

costs related to acquisitions of businesses or technologies;

 

competition;

 

changes or consolidation in the real estate industry;

 

changes in subscriber budgets;

 

changes in regulatory requirements, laws, policies and other regulatory developments;

interest rate fluctuations;

 

inflation;

changes in tax laws and regulations;

 

inflation;

changes in accounting policies or practices; and

 

other factors outside of our control.

An impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangible assets could negatively impact our consolidated results of operations.

Reis has $54,825,000 of goodwill at December 31, 2014,2017, which is not an amortizable asset and is tested for impairment at least annually, or after a triggering event has occurred, requiring such a calculation. In addition, the carrying amount of amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 20142017 aggregated $14,681,000.$19,474,000. There were no indications of impairment in any of the Company’s intangible assets or goodwill at December 31, 2014.2017. If, in the future, a determination is made that the carrying amount of the Company’s goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is less than the fair value of the respective asset, the Company would record an impairment charge in accordance with the applicable accounting literature. Any future impairment charge could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations, net worth, or the market price of our common stock.

Our business depends on retaining and attracting capable management, operating and operatingsales personnel.

The implementation and development of Reis’s business plan require the skills and knowledge of our senior executives, as well as our sales, technology and operational personnel. Reis may not be able to offset the impact of the loss of the services of these individuals or other key officers or employees because our business requires skilled management, as well as technical, product and technology, and sales and marketing personnel, who are in high demand and are often subject to competing offers. Competition for qualified employees is intense in the information industry, and the loss of a substantial number of qualified employees, or an inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees, could have a material adverse impact on Reis.

Although Reis uses various incentive programs to retain and attract key personnel, these measures may not be sufficient to either attract or retain, as applicable, the personnel required to ensure our success. In addition, grants and issuances pursuant to our equity incentive plans may result in dilution to Reis stockholders.

In order to support future revenue growth, we need to continue to expand, train and retain our sales force. Our ability to develop a strong and productive sales force may be adversely affected by: our ability to attract, retain and motivate new sales personnel; our ability to properly train our sales force; the capability of our sales force to sell an increasing number of potential new products and services while negotiating higher rates on existing services; the length of time for new sales personnel to become productive and quota carrying; competition from other companies in hiring and retaining sales personnel; and our ability to effectively structure our sales force. If we are unable to hire qualified sales personnel and develop and retain the members of our sales force, including sales management, or if our sales team is not successful, our revenues or growth rate could decline and our expenses could increase.

The loss of one or more of our senior executives, or our sales, technology or operational personnel, could have a material adverse impact on the continuing operations of Reis and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We may be subject to tax audits or other procedures concerning our tax collection policies.policies and laws that govern our responsibility to collect sales taxes may change.

We do not collect sales or other similar taxes in states other than New York. However, one or more states (other than New York) may seek to impose sales tax collection obligations onout-of-state companies, such as Reis, which engage in online commerce. A successful assertion that we should collect sales, use or other taxes on the sale of our products or services into these states could subject us to liability for current or past taxes due, and could increase the effective price of our products and services, which could harm our business. In addition, the Supreme Court of the United States is expected to revisit in the spring term of 2018 the degree of physical presence required within a state in order for the state to be permitted to impose sales tax on revenue derived within that state and it is possible that the Court may expand or modify existing precedents in a manner that would increase our responsibility to collect sales taxes.

If we are not able to successfully identify or integrate future acquisitions, our business operations and financial condition could be adversely affected, and future acquisitions may divert management’s attention and consume significant resources.

We may in the future attempt to further expand our markets and services in part through acquisitions of complementary businesses, services, databases and technologies. Mergers and acquisitions are inherently risky, and we cannot assure you that future acquisitions, if any, will be successful. The successful execution of any future acquisition strategy will depend on our ability to identify, negotiate, complete and integrate such acquisitions. Acquisitions involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including the potential unavailability of financial resources necessary to consummate acquisitions, the potential inability to identify all of the risks and liabilities inherent in a target company, the diversion of management’s attention from the operations of our business and strain on our existing personnel. In addition, any acquired businesses would generally be subject to the other risks described under this “Risks Related to the Reis Services Business and the Information Services Industry Generally” section.

Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquired businesses could harm our business. Integration of acquired entities can involve significant difficulties, such as strain on our personnel, systems and operational and managerial controls and procedures, the need to modify systems or add management resources, possible adverse short-term effects on cash flows or operating results, diversion of management’s attention from the operations of our business and failure to obtain and retain key personnel of an acquired business. In addition, if we finance acquisitions by incurring additional debt, our financial condition or liquidity could be adversely impacted. If we finance or otherwise complete acquisitions by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, existing stockholders’ ownership may be diluted.

Risks RelatedChanges in accounting and reporting policies or practices may impact our financial results or presentation of results, which may adversely affect our stock price.

Any potential changes in accounting and reporting policies or practices (such as changes from the January 1, 2018 adoption of the new revenue recognition standard (including not only its effects on revenue recognition in 2018, but also the accounting for costs to Our Discontinued Operations (Residential Development Activities)

Weobtain a contract) or the future adoption of new lease accounting rules) could impact the timing of the recording of revenue or expenses, could increase expenses, and could reduce our revenue, income from continuing operations, net income, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, which results may be exposedindependent of changes in our operations. These increases in expenses, in conjunction with reductions in reported revenue, income from continuing operations, net income, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA could cause our stock price to risks associated with our prior development, construction and sale of residential units, and our prior ownership of real property generally.

Reisdecline. The changes in accounting policies could also impact the Company’s balance sheet and certain of its subsidiaries were exposed to significant losses and other expenses associated with construction defect litigation at its Colorado condominium project during 2012. Reis may be exposed in the future to other claims associated with its discontinued residential development activities, including its involvement in the development, construction and sale of single family homes or lots, or claims related to environmental remediation, dissatisfaction by homeowners and homeowners’ associations with the construction of homes and amenities by us and/or our developer partners, or other matters, which could result in litigation costs, remediation costs, warranty expenses or settlement costs which could be material to Reis’s reported discontinued operations, financial condition and cash flows. See Note 10 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for information relating to the Company’s Gold Peak condominium project in Colorado (“Gold Peak”).

We may be unable to recover any cash from insurance companies or other potentially responsible parties.

We continue to evaluate the cost and benefits of pursuing cash recovery efforts from insurance providers, subcontractors, other professionals, our partners or other potentially responsible parties related to the Gold Peak project. During 2012, Reis and certain of its subsidiaries settled with, and used $17,000,000 of cash on the balance sheet to pay the Gold Peak homeowners association. No portion of the $17,000,000 was provided by any of the other defendants, potentially responsible parties or insurance companies. Our recovery efforts may include litigation, mediation, settlement or trials. Recovery efforts through December 31, 2014 resulted in cash collections aggregating $819,000, including $26,000, $80,000 and $713,000 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During 2015, we may incur additional legal and expert costs and allocate resources to our recovery efforts, which may not result in any cash recoveries. As described in Note 10 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, a trial in the comprehensive insurance action is scheduled for July 2015, and the trial in the subcontractor case is scheduled for October 2015. The amount of incurred costs related to these actions, without any cash recoveries, could negatively affect our discontinued operating results, financial condition and cash flow.ratios.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock, Our Capital Structure and Reis Generally

Our common stock is thinly traded; there may continue to be little or no liquidity for shares of our common stock; and our Board of Directors may take actions with which you disagree, which affect the trading price of our common stock.

Historically, our common stock has been thinly traded, and a highly active trading market for our common stock may not develop. In the absence of a highly active public trading market, investors trying to sell their shares may find it difficult to find buyers for their shares at prices quoted in the market or at all.

Our Board of Directors, or Board, may authorize transactions with respect to our common stock. These transactions may include a reverse stock split orodd-lot or other share repurchase programs, or the declaration of aone-time or recurring dividend. Between December 2008 and

On August 2011,30, 2016, the Company’s Board authorized the repurchase ofa program to purchase up to an aggregate amount of $5,000,000 of ourthe Company’s common stock. Cumulatively,Purchases under the program may be made from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Depending on market conditions, financial developments and other factors, these purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time, or from time to time, without prior notice and may be expanded without prior notice. The Company may make purchases pursuant to a trading plan under Securities Exchange Act Rule10b5-1, permitting open market purchases of common stock during blackout periods.

During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company utilized $4,449,000 throughpurchased an aggregate of 182,028 and 54,176 shares of common stock for approximately $3,421,000 and $1,144,000, respectively, or an average price of $19.33 per share, leaving approximately $435,000 at December 31, 2011, and repurchased approximately 8.1% of2017 that may be used to purchase additional shares under the common shares outstanding atrepurchase program in the time of the Board’s initial authorization in December 2008. future.

All future decisions regarding additional authorizations to repurchase stock will be at the discretion of our Board, will require authorization from the Board, and will be evaluated from time to time in light of the Company’s liquidity and anticipated cash needs, the price per share of our common stock, the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, applicable NASDAQ rules, debt covenant compliance requirements, applicable law and other factors deemed relevant. Amounts may be authorized by the Board whereby future purchases could be commenced or suspended at any time, or from time to time without notice. If we effect any such repurchases in the future, the liquidity of our common stock could be adversely affected due to the reduced number of shares that would

be outstanding. In addition, a share repurchase program requires the payment of cash by Reis to stockholders, which could adversely impact our liquidity. If we effect a reverse stock split, there can be no assurance that the market price per share of our common stock after the reverse stock split will rise or remain constant in proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding before the reverse stock split.

WeThe Company commenced a quarterly dividend program in the second quarter of 2014 when weit declared and paid an initial quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per common share in June 2014. Inshare. The Company increased the third and fourth quarters of 2014, wedividends declared and paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.11to $0.14 per common share in eachfor all four quarters of September 20142015 and December 2014, respectively. Aggregateincreased the dividends declared and paid to $0.17 per share for all four quarters of 2016 and 2017. Dividends paid by the Company during 2014 approximated $3,698,000.2017, 2016 and 2015 aggregated approximately $7,876,000, $7,747,000 and $6,338,000, respectively. On February 2, 2015, we15, 2018, the Company announced that we have increased the next quarterly dividend is payable on March 18, 2015 to $0.1414, 2018 at $0.19 per common share. Although we anticipate paying a quarterly dividend hereafter, future dividends are subject to approval by the Board. If the Board were to declare a special dividend, or increase the regular quarterly dividend pay rate, to an amount greater than $0.14 per share, the cash used for such a special dividend or dividend increase could adversely impact our liquidity. Conversely, if we were to reduce, or stop paying a quarterly dividend, it could result in a change in the investment profile of Reis and could cause certain stockholders with an investment criteria of investing in stocks that pay a dividend to sell our stock, potentially adversely affecting the market for and the market price of our common stock.

The Company may decide to sell shares of stock which could be dilutive to existing shareholders of Reis stock.

In order to continue to grow revenue, management may need to increase its spending to hire additional employees to build databases and improve our website functionality, or may identify the need to invest in additional or new technologies or pursue an acquisition of tangible or intangible assets or a business. We may need additional cash, beyond what is generated by the business or available under existing debt arrangements, or if new credit is not available, to be able to fund certain objectives, and may decide to raise capital by selling additional shares of common stock or issuing other forms of equity in Reis. If we issue equity or convertible debt securities, existing stockholders’ ownership may be diluted. In addition, the price for which our shares trade may be reduced.

On June 24, 2015, the Company’s shelf registration statement on FormS-3 was declared effective. The shelf registration statement permits the offering, issuance and sale of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $75,000,000 of the Company’s stock from time to time for three years through June 24, 2018. Any determinations about the issuance of new common shares will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board and the use of proceeds, unless otherwise indicated, will be for general corporate purposes, which may include working capital, capital expenditures or acquisitions. Management will retain broad discretion in the allocation of the net proceeds. Although the Company has no immediate plans to issue shares under the shelf registration statement, any potential equity offerings in the future could dilute the ownership interest of our existing stockholders and could cause the Company’s stock price to decline.

Certain of our executive officers and directors own a significant percentage of our stock, have significant control of our management and affairs, and may favor transactions or policies with which you disagree.

The named executive officers and directors of Reis in the aggregate beneficially owned approximately 24.2%22.1% of Reis’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2014.2017. Of this total, Lloyd Lynford and Jonathan Garfield, each of whom is a founder, an executive officer and a director of the Company, beneficially owned 12.4%11.7% and 8.8%8.4%, respectively, at December 31, 2014.2017. A significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price of a company’s common stock because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies where management holds a significant percentage of the voting power. A concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control, including a merger, consolidation or

other business combination involving Reis, or discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control, even if such a change of control might be seen as beneficial to other Reis stockholders.

Executive officers, directors and employees may sell shares of Reis stock.

Certain of our executive officers, directors and employees currently have in effect or in the future may establish selling plans in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. These selling plans may be utilized to provide such employees with a degree of financial diversification, estate and family planning, as well as to assist in satisfying certain tax or other financial obligations.obligations including, in connection with the vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) or option exercises. In the fourth quarter of 2014, both Lloyd Lynford and Jonathan Garfield established selling plans under Rule10b5-1 which arewere designed to comply with selling limitations under Rule 144. Those plans expired in the second quarter of 2015. Mr. Garfield established a new selling plan in the fourth quarter of 2015 which expired on May 6, 2016. William Sander, the President and Chief Operating Officer of Reis Services, has had selling plans under Rule10b5-1 in place for a number of years. In connection with the June 2015 registration statement on FormS-3, Lloyd Lynford and Jonathan Garfield also registered their shares, making them eligible for inclusion in an offering by the Company or for sale in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or other transactions. As of the date of this annual report on Form10-K, neither individual has sold any shares under this registration statement. Messrs. Lynford and Garfield may also sell shares from time to time (other than pursuant to this registration statement) under Rule 144 or another exemption from the SEC’s registration requirements. The market may disfavor

the adoption of Rule10b5-1 trading plans by one or more of our officers or directors, or selling under the FormS-3 by Mr. Lynford and/or Mr. Garfield, perceiving that such a plan representsselling or plans to sell represent a decline in management’s confidence about our prospects or that the parameters for and trading under a Rule10b5-1 sales plan or off of the FormS-3 or other selling could cause downward pressure on our stock price. In addition, as part

The exercise of options, like any other equity award vesting or exercise, will create dilution from the issuance of shares in settlement of the terms ofexercised options and could exert downward pressure on the Merger in May 2007, both Messrs. LynfordCompany’s stock price if the employee chooses to cover the option exercise price and Garfield have certain rights, subjectincome tax withholding obligations due to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders. the Company upon exercise by selling shares.

Selling of shares by employees, especially executives, could adversely affect the demand for our stock, could negatively impact the liquidity of our stock and could result in a decrease in the market price of our stock.

Our governing documents and Maryland law contain anti-takeover provisions that may discourage acquisition bids or merger proposals, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Reis’s articles of amendment and restatement and bylaws contain provisions designed to discourage attempts to acquire control of Reis by merger, tender offer, proxy contest, or removal of incumbent management without the approval of our Board. These provisions may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire control of Reis even if a change of control might be seen as beneficial by other Reis stockholders. This could discourage potential takeover attempts and could adversely affect the market price of Reis’s common stock. Reis’s governing documents:

 

provide for a classified board of directors, which could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change of control;

 

authorize the issuance of blank check stock that could be issued by Reis’s Board to thwart a takeover attempt;

 

provide that directors can only be removed for cause pursuant to a vote oftwo-thirds of the shares entitled to vote for the election of directors; and

 

contain advance notice requirements for nominations of candidates for election to our Board or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

In addition, under Maryland law, certain “business combinations” (including certain issuances of equity securities) between a Maryland corporation and any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporation’s shares or an affiliate thereof are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, unless waived by the then existing board. Our Board may approve certain transactions or exempt certain interested stockholders at any time prior to a party becoming an interested stockholder. At December 31, 20142017 and through the date of this annual report on Form10-K, the Board has not approved any exemptions from the Maryland statute.

Increases in interest rates could increase our interest expense.

In October 2012, Reis Services, as borrower, and the Company, as guarantor, entered into a loan and security agreement with Capital One, National Association, as lender, for a $10,000,000 revolving credit facility, which we refer to as the 2012 Revolver. The 2012 Revolver hashad a three year term expiringscheduled to expire on October 16, 2015,2015; however, the expiration date was extended to January 31, 2016. In January 2016, Reis Services and anyCapital One executed an amended and restated loan and security agreement for a $20,000,000 revolving credit facility with terms substantially similar to the 2012 Revolver (as amended, the “2016 Revolver,” and collectively with the 2012 Revolver, the “Revolver”). The 2016 Revolver expires on January 28, 2019. Any borrowings on the Revolver bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 2.00% per annum (for LIBOR loans) or the greater of 1.00% or the bank’s prime rate minus 0.50% per annum (for base rate loans) and is subject to an unused facility fee of 0.25% per annum.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, we had no debt outstanding; however, we may borrow amounts under the Revolver in the future. There have been instances in the past when we purchased interest rate caps on our outstanding debt to limit our exposure to significant interest rate increases. In deciding whether to purchase interest rate caps or other hedging instruments, we may weigh the value of protection against significant increases in interest rates against the cost of such instruments. The Company does not have any interest rate caps or other hedging instruments at December 31, 2014.2017. Therefore, if interest rates increase, our interest costs on any outstanding

borrowings would also increase, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

The Company may seek to extend, modify or replace the Revolver.

The Revolver is scheduled to expire on October 16, 2015. We may consider, based upon market conditions and business needs, refinancing or otherwise amending or replacing the Revolver with a new facility. There can be no assurance that we will be able to do so, or be able to do so on terms that are acceptable to us.

Our Revolver contains and a modified or replacement facility will likely contain, covenants that restrict our operations, which may negatively affect our ability to operate our business and limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities. Declines in our operational performance could cause financial covenants to be violated on our outstanding debt.

Provisions in the Revolver or a modified or replacement facility may impose restrictions on the Company’s ability to, among other things:

 

incur additional debt;

 

amend its organizational documents;

 

pay dividends and make distributions;

 

redeem or repurchase outstanding equity;

 

make certain investments or enter into transactions to acquire assets or businesses;

 

create certain liens;

 

enter into transactions with stockholders and affiliates;

 

undergo a change of control; and

 

make certain fundamental changes, including engaging in a merger or consolidation.

The Revolver also contains other customary covenants, including covenants which require the Company to meet specified financial ratios and financial tests. If the Company were not able to comply with these covenants in the future, the failure to do so may result in the Company seeking waivers or modifications to the financial ratios and financial tests, or ultimately the declaration of an event of default. Furthermore, certain events, such as the voluntary or involuntary filing by Reis under any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar law (which is not stayed or dismissed within certain time periods), will cause an event of default. In addition, an event of default, if not cured or waived, may result in the acceleration of the maturity of indebtedness outstanding under the Revolver, which would require the Company to pay all amounts outstanding. If an event of default occurs, the lender may not make any waivers or modifications to financial covenants, and the Company may not be able to cure it within any applicable cure period, if at all. If the maturity of this indebtedness is accelerated, Reis Services or Reis may not have the ability to borrow or obtain sufficient funds to replace the accelerated indebtedness on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Furthermore, the Revolver is secured by Reis Services’s assets and, therefore, these assets would not be available to secure additional credit.

The Company may decide to sell shares of stock which could be dilutive to existing shareholders of Reis stock.

In order to continue to grow revenue, management may need to increase its spending to hire additional employees to build databases and improve our website functionality, or may identify the need to invest in additional or new technology or pursue an acquisition of tangible or intangible assets or a business. We may need additional cash, beyond what is generated by the business or available under the Revolver, to be able to fund certain objectives, and may decide to raise capital by selling additional shares of common stock or issuing other forms of equity in Reis. If we issue equity or convertible debt securities, existing stockholders’ ownership may be diluted. In addition, the price for which our shares trade may be reduced.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards will be subject to limitation and the generation of taxable income in the future.

The Company has significant Federal, state and local net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards at December 31, 2014.2017. The aggregate Federal NOLs were approximately $61,165,000$37,859,000 at December 31, 2014.2017. These NOLs include NOLsamounts generated subsequent to the Merger, losses from the Reis Services business prior to the Merger and the Company’s operating losses prior to the Merger. Approximately $20,317,000$5,140,000 of these Federal NOLs are subject to an annual limitation of $2,779,000, per year, whereas the remaining balance of approximately $40,848,000$32,719,000 is not subject to such athe limitation. All of these losses may be utilized against consolidated Federal taxable income in the future.future, subject to expiration 20 years after the losses are incurred. However, for net operating losses incurred after December 31, 2017, such net operating losses will have an indefinite life, but usage will be limited to 80% of taxable income in any given year. The actual ability to utilize the tax benefit of any existing NOLs will be dependent upon the rules described above and the Company’s ability to generate taxable income in the future, if at all. A

On December 22, 2017, the Federal government of the United States enacted the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“the Tax Act”) which significantly changed existing U.S. tax laws, including a reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) and a refund of certain existing AMT credits over several years, introduction of a capital investment deduction, limitation of the interest deduction, limitation of the use of net operating losses incurred on or after January 1, 2018 to offset future taxable income, limitation of the deduction for compensation paid to certain executive officers and extensive changes to the U.S. international tax system, as well as other changes. These changes generally took effect on January 1, 2018. The U.S. Treasury department is expected to release regulations implementing the Tax Act and the U.S. tax laws may be further amended in the future. The Tax Act is complex andfar-reaching and we cannot predict with certainty the resulting impact its enactment will have on us. On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment

date for companies to finalize the accounting. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply its current tax accounting on the basis of the provision of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act. As a result, the consolidated statements of operations reflect a net expense of $5,142,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from there-measurement of our net Federal deferred tax assets to the lower corporate tax rate, which we are reporting provisionally. While the Company was able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of the reduction in the Federal corporate rate, the final impact of the Tax Act may differ from these estimates, including, but not limited to, changes in our interpretations and assumptions, additional guidance that may be issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and return to provision differences and state rate adjustments. The Company is continuing to gather additional information to determine the final impact.

The reduction in the balance of our net Federal deferred tax assets resulted in expense being recorded in the 2017 statement of operations, which may affect our stock price. Future financial results and cash flows may be negatively impacted as the Company continues its analysis and further understands other impacts on the use of NOLs from the Tax Act.

During March 2014, New York State enacted a law to (1) reduce corporate tax rates, effective in future years and anticipated conforming changes to(2) change the method of determining the availability and use of NOLs existing at December 31, 2014. In April 2015, New York City enacted a law which substantially conforms with the New York State changes. The Company expects, in the future, that it will be subject to cash payments for a portion of its state and local income taxes as the changed New York State and New York City law in 2015 willlaws limit the amount of existing NOLs which could be used each year in those jurisdictions; however, althoughyear. Although the lossesamount of NOLs in New York State and New York City are limited for any particular year, we expect to fully utilize all of our NOLs in the future.

Federal, state and local tax audits may result in the payment of additional taxes, penalties and interest.

Our tax returns are subject to audit by Federal, state and local tax authorities. Currently, Reis’s Federal tax returns are open for 20112014, 2015 and 2013. The 2012 Federal tax return is currently under audit. Reis’s2016. With few exceptions, the state and a subsidiary’s New York Statelocal income tax returns are under auditopen to examination for the years 2004 to 2006 and are open, as a result of signed waiver, for the years 2007 to 2013. Reis’s and a subsidiary’s New York City tax returns are also open for the years 2004 to 2013 as well. The tax returns of another Reis subsidiary are open in Colorado for 2010 to 2013. All other tax years are closed.2014 through 2016. However, prior year tax returns giving rise to an NOL may be reviewable in connection with the audit of a later tax year when such loss is utilized. The ultimate resolutionaudit of the current audits andan open tax years for New York State and New York City, as well as open tax years for Federal purposes,year could result in the payment of additional tax, penalties and interest, which could negatively affect our profitability and cash flows.

Other states, besides states where physical nexus exists, may aggressively pursue Reis and its subsidiaries under the theory of economic nexus. Such claims by a state could result in the payment of additional tax in the future, as well as for prior unpaid tax, penalties and interest, which could negatively affect our profitability and cash flows.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

At December 31, 2014,2017, the Company leasedhad leases in place on approximately 38,00045,000 square feet of space in New York, New York under two leases, both ofone lease, which expireexpires in September 2016 andOctober 2025, approximately 10,00042,000 square feet of space in White Plains, New York, under one lease, which expires in September 2019.June 2023 and approximately 1,500 square feet of space in Laguna Beach, California, under one lease, which expires in June 2020.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

As disclosed in Note 109 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company is engaged in certain legal matters, and the disclosure set forth in Note 109 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

The Company’s common shares trade on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “REIS.” As of December 31, 2014,2017, there were 237243 holders of record of our common stock. Since certain of our shares are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of shareholders, the foregoing number is not representative of the number of beneficial owners.

The high and low sales prices per share for our common stock for each quarter in the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 are as follows:

 

  2014   2013   2017  2016

Quarter

          High                   Low                   High                   Low           High  Low  High  Low

First

  $19.80        $16.64        $16.49        $12.01        $  23.00    $  16.90    $  24.78    $  20.06  

Second

  $21.23        $16.36        $19.08        $14.43        $  21.60    $  17.50    $  26.59    $  21.78  

Third

  $23.95        $20.95        $18.93        $15.66        $  21.85    $  15.95    $  26.57    $  18.16  

Fourth

  $28.82        $21.37        $19.75        $15.95        $  22.22    $  16.83    $  23.63    $  18.43  

Common Stock Price Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Reis’s common stock, which is represented below by “REIS,” for the period commencing December 31, 20092012 through December 31, 2014,2017, with the cumulative total return on the Russell 2000 Index, which we refer to as the Russell 2000, and the S&P 500 Index, which we refer to as the S&P 500, for the same period. Reis has chosen the Russell 2000 based on the market capitalization of the issuers contained in that index. Reis has not identified a peer group for stock price performance purposes, due to the limited number of issuers in businesses similar to ours. Total return values were calculated based on cumulative total return assuming (1) the investment of $100 in the Russell 2000, the S&P 500 and Reis common stock on December 31, 2009,2012, and (2) reinvestment of dividends. The total return for Reis common stock from December 31, 20092012 to December 31, 20142017 was a gain of approximately 331.5%75.6% versus a gain of approximately 105.9%107.9% for the Russell 2000S&P 500 and a gain of approximately 105.0%93.4% for the S&P 500.

Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total ReturnRussell 2000.

 

Dividends

The Company commenced a quarterly dividend program in the second quarter of 2014 when it declared and paid an initial quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per common share in June 2014. Inshare. The Company increased the third and fourth quarters of 2014, the Companydividends declared and paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.11to $0.14 per common share in eachfor all four quarters of September 20142015, and December 2014. Aggregate dividendsincreased the dividend declared and paid to $0.17 for all four quarters of 2016 and 2017. Dividends paid by the Company during 2014 approximated $3,698,000. On2017, 2016 and 2015 aggregated approximately $7,876,000, $7,747,000 and $6,338,000, respectively. In February 2, 2015,2018, the Company announced that it has increased thedeclared a quarterly dividend payable on March 18, 2015 to $0.14of $0.19 per common share.share payable in March 2018. Although the Company anticipates paying a quarterly dividend hereafter, future dividends are subject to approval by the Board. The Company did not declare or distribute any dividends during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The Company has not sold any unregistered securities within the past three years.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

DuringOn August 30, 2016, the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2014, the Company did notCompany’s Board authorized a repurchase anyprogram of shares of the Company’s common stock.

Authorizationstock up to an aggregate of $5,000,000. Purchases under the program may be made from the Board will be required for any stock repurchasestime to time in the future.open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Depending on market conditions, financial developments and other factors, amountsthese purchases may be authorized by the Board whereby future purchases could be commenced or suspended at any time, or from time to time, without prior notice and may be expanded without prior notice. The Company may make purchases pursuant to a trading plan under Securities Exchange Act Rule10b5-1, permitting open market purchases of common stock during blackout periods consistent with the Company’s “Policies for Transactions in Reis Stock and Insider Trading and Tipping.”

During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company repurchased the following common shares:

Period

  Total Number of
  Shares Purchased  
   Average Price
  Paid per Share  
   Total Number of
Shares Purchased
  as Part of Publicly  
Announced Plans or
Programs
   Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
That May Yet Be
  Purchased Under  
the Plans or
Programs
 

October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2017

   9,950     $18.59      9,950     $493,250   

November 1, 2017 to November 30, 2017

   3,161     $18.51      3,161     $434,750   

December 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017

   —     $
        —  
 
   —     $        434,750   

From the inception of the share repurchase program in August 2016, through December 31, 2017, the Company purchased an aggregate of 236,204 shares of common stock at an average price of $19.33 per share, for an aggregate of approximately $4,565,000. Cumulatively, the Company has repurchased approximately 2.1% of the common shares outstanding at the time of the Board’s authorization on August 30, 2016.

Other Security Information

For additional information concerning the Company’s capitalization, see Note 87 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Calculation of Aggregate Market Value ofNon-Affiliate Shares

For purposes of calculating the aggregate market value of shares of common stock of the Company held bynon-affiliates, as shown on the cover page of this annual report on Form10-K, it has been assumed that all of the outstanding shares at June 30, 20142017 were held bynon-affiliates except for shares held by directors and officers of the Company. However, this should not be deemed to constitute an admission that all of such directors and officers are, in fact, affiliates of the Company, or that there are not other persons who may be deemed to be affiliates of the Company. For further information concerning shareholdings of officers, directors and principal stockholders, see “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The following table presents selected financial data for the Company and should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the consolidated financial statements included herein starting at pageF-1. For the periods presented, this information conforms with the current financial statement presentation which segregates the assets and liabilities, as well as the operating results of the Company’s discontinued operations segment.

 

(amounts in thousands, except per share data)              
  For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Years Ended December 31, 

Consolidated Statements of Operations:

  2014   2013   2012   2011   2010   2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 

Subscription revenue

  $    46,802  $    45,399  $    43,722  $    39,727  $    34,721     

Other revenue (A)

   1,388  2,131  7,168  1,608   —     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Subscription revenue

  $    41,335     $    34,721     $    31,229     $    27,180     $    24,198   

Income from continuing operations (A)

  $4,616     $17,933     $8,013     $4,861     $465   

Net income (loss) (A)(B)(C)

  $4,047     $17,597     $(4,284)    $1,886     $668   

Total revenue

  $48,190  $47,530  $50,890  $41,335  $34,721     
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations (B) (C)

  $(3,158 $2,781  $8,071  $4,616  $17,933     

Net (loss) income (B) (C)

  $(3,158 $2,781  $10,305  $4,047  $17,597     

Per share amounts – basic:

                

Income from continuing operations

  $0.42     $1.65     $0.75     $0.46     $0.04   

Net income (loss)

  $0.37     $1.62     $(0.40)    $0.18     $0.06   

(Loss) income from continuing operations

  $(0.28 $0.25  $0.72  $0.42  $1.65     

Net (loss) income

  $(0.28 $0.25  $0.92  $0.37  $1.62     

Per share amounts – diluted:

                

Income from continuing operations

  $0.39     $1.57     $0.73     $0.45     $0.04   

Net income (loss)

  $0.34     $1.54     $(0.39)    $0.17     $0.06   

(Loss) income from continuing operations

  $(0.28 $0.24  $0.69  $0.39  $1.57     

Net (loss) income

  $(0.28 $0.24  $0.88  $0.34  $1.54     

Cash dividends per share

  $0.33     $—     $—     $—     $—     $0.68  $0.68  $0.56  $0.33  $—     
  December 31, 
  December 31, 

Consolidated Balance Sheets:

  2014   2013   2012   2011   2010   2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 

Cash (D)

  $17,745     $10,560     $4,961     $22,153     $20,164     $19,671  $21,491  $28,658  $17,745  $10,560     

Total assets

  $    123,888     $    117,867     $      98,034     $    111,218     $    106,688     $121,604  $128,144  $133,199  $123,888  $117,867     

Total debt from continuing operations (E)

  $—     $—     $—     $5,691     $11,250   

Debt

  $  $  $  $  $—     

Deferred revenue

  $22,885     $20,284     $18,230     $15,707     $15,446     $26,534  $25,031  $25,291  $22,885  $20,284     

Total stockholders’ equity

  $96,113     $92,871     $74,557     $77,510     $74,292     $88,473  $97,180  $101,579  $96,113  $92,871     
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  December 31, 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

  2014   2013   2012   2011   2010   2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 

Net cash provided by (used in):

                

Operating activities (D)

  $14,789     $11,442     $(6,555)    $11,961     $9,665     $16,156  $15,802  $24,236  $14,789  $    11,442     

Investing activities(E)

  $(4,203)    $(4,499)    $(4,037)    $(3,623)    $(2,647)    $(9,613 $(13,325 $(6,187 $(4,203 $    (4,499)     

Financing activities

  $(3,401)    $(1,344)    $(6,600)    $(6,349)    $(9,589)  

                    

Financing activities (F)

  $

 

(8,363

 

 

 $

 

(9,644

 

 

 $

 

(7,136

 

 

 $

 

(3,401

 

 

 $

 

    (1,344)    

 

 

 

(A)

(A)  Other revenue includesnon-subscription revenue comprised of(1) non-subscription custom data deliverables and(2) one-time settlements.

(B)  The 2017 amounts reflect a $5,142 tax expense associated with the reduction in the deferred tax asset balance at December 31, 2017 from the change in the Federal tax rate to 21%. See Note 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K.

(C)  The 2013 2012 and 2011 amounts reflect a net tax benefit of $13,670 $5,427 and $4,075, respectively, in both income from continuing operations and net income, (loss), primarily from the reversal of valuation allowances recorded against certain of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards.

(B)

(D)  Operating cash flow was positively impacted in 2015 by $4,779 from litigation recoveries in that period. See Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K.

(E)  The 2012 net (loss)increase in investing activities in 2016 reflects capitalized costs for increased investments in our websites and related per share amountsdatabases; such investments aggregated $8,509. The remaining $4,816 of cash used for investing activities relates primarily to space expansion and furnishing our new corporate headquarters and our operations facility.

(F)  Financing activities in 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 reflect a net litigation chargethe use of $11,547, which was recorded in income (loss) from discontinued operations in 2012. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”cash for dividend payments of approximately $7,876, $7,747, $6,338 and $3,698, respectively.

(C)

The 2011 net income and related per share amounts reflect a net litigation charge of $4,460, which was recorded in income (loss) from discontinued operations at December 31, 2011. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”

(D)

The Company’s cash balance at December 31, 2012 and cash flow from operating activities was negatively impacted by the $17,000 cash settlement paid in 2012 in connection with the Gold Peak litigation. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”

(E)

Reductions in total debt from continuing operations reflects repayments made in each period. The Company has no outstanding debt at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations..

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K.

Management Summary

Over the course of the year, the Company recorded incremental quarterly improvements in key financial metrics. Reis started the year with a first quarter decline in revenue and ended with positive revenue growth for the fourth quarter and full year of 2017. Revenue declined in the first quarter of 2017 by (5.4)%; improved in the second quarter of 2017 by 0.8%; accelerated by 4.8% in the third quarter of 2017; and grew by 6.1% in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to each respective 2016 quarter. These improving trends also occurred over the course of 2017 in income before taxes, consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and Reis Services EBITDA. These advances resulted from improving renewal rates (the overall renewal rate improved to 88.3% for the year ended December 31, 2017) and revenue from new business. All of these metrics will be discussed in greater detail in this section.

During 2017, the Company also made significant product and data enhancements. Reis’s database and analytical tools have historically covered the nine key property types most important to real estate professionals focused on the U.S. CRE market (apartment, office, retail, warehouse/distribution, flex/research & development, self storage, seniors housing, student housing and affordable housing), providing up to 38 years of trend analysis and market forecasts for up to 275 metropolitan markets and thousands of submarkets. With the completion of a multi-year initiative to expand upon this cornerstone asset, Reis now offers market information, transaction data and building insights for all commercial properties throughout the nation, regardless of location, size, or use type. The achievement of “Every Property, Everywhere” positions Reis to serve all CRE professionals anduse-cases both within and beyond the Company’s 2014 financial performance reflects management’s long-standing commitmenttraditional property types and coverage boundaries. In parallel with the development of “Every Property, Everywhere,” the Company has also built a new API, a delivery system that embeds Reis’s data (legacy and newly launched) into any client’s and prospect’s internal system, regardless of platform.

The completion of this expansion of coverage in February 2018 affords Reis the opportunity to innovationsell to new user groups within current client firms, and providingto accelerate sales among tens of thousands of prospect firms, including from investment sales brokerages, tax assessors, tax appeal professionals, and other commercial real estate investors with industry leading market informationprofessionals involved in transactions, asset and analytical tools. The continuing adoption ofportfolio management. This achievement was only possible through the measured step up in investments in our products, both by new customersdatabase in recent years.

Critical Business Metrics

Management considers certain metrics in evaluating its consolidated results and within our existing customer base, is reflected in the 19.0% annual revenue growth rate recorded from 2013 to 2014. EBITDAperformance of the Reis Services business grew 17.8% oversegment. These metrics are revenue, revenue growth, EBITDA (which is earnings (net income (loss)) before discontinued operations, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), EBITDA growth, EBITDA margin, Adjusted EBITDA (which is net income (loss) before discontinued operations, interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation), Adjusted EBITDA growth and Adjusted EBITDA margin. Other important metrics that same period, resultingmanagement considers include cash flow generation as well as the visibility into future performance as supported by our deferred revenue and other related metrics discussed in anthis Item 7.

Following is a presentation of revenue, net income (loss), income before income taxes and discontinued operations, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and the related margins on a consolidated basis and revenue, EBITDA and EBITDA margin for the Reis Services segment (see below for a reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for both the Reis Services segment and on a consolidated basis for each of the periods presented here).

(amounts in thousands, excluding percentages)               
   For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
  Increase
(Decrease)
       Percentage    
Increase

(Decrease)
 
   2017   2016    

Consolidated:

       

Total revenue

  $12,263        $11,554   $709     6.1 % 

Net (loss)

  $(4,548)       $(230)  $(4,318)    (1,877.4)% 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $1,038        $(141)  $1,179     836.2

EBITDA

  $3,229        $1,791   $1,438     80.3

EBITDA margin

   26.3%     15.5   

Adjusted EBITDA

  $3,784        $2,310   $1,474     63.8

Adjusted EBITDA margin

   30.9%     20.0   

Reis Services segment:

       

Total revenue

  $        12,263        $        11,554   $709     6.1

EBITDA

  $    4,328        $2,665   $        1,663     62.4

EBITDA margin

   35.3%     23.1   

(amounts in thousands, excluding percentages)

   For the Years Ended
December 31,
   Increase       Percentage    
Increase
 
   2017   2016   (Decrease)   (Decrease) 

Consolidated:

        

Total revenue

  $48,190       $47,530       $660     1.4% 

Net (loss) income

  $(3,158)      $2,781       $            (5,939)    (213.6)% 

Income before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $2,433       $4,734       $(2,301)    (48.6)% 

EBITDA

  $10,616       $11,450       $(834)    (7.3)% 

EBITDA margin

   22.0%    24.1%     

Adjusted EBITDA

  $12,827       $13,549       $(722)    (5.3)% 

Adjusted EBITDA margin

   26.6%    28.5%     

Reis Services segment:

        

Total revenue

  $48,190       $47,530       $660     1.4% 

EBITDA

  $        15,134       $        15,537       $(403)    (2.6)% 

EBITDA margin

   31.4%    32.7%     
   For the Years Ended
December 31,
   Increase   Percentage
Increase
 
   2016   2015   (Decrease)   (Decrease) 

Consolidated:

        

Total revenue

  $47,530       $50,890       $(3,360)    (6.6)% 

Net income

  $2,781       $10,305       $(7,524)    (73.0)% 

Income before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $4,734       $12,076       $(7,342)    (60.8)% 

EBITDA

  $11,450       $17,708       $(6,258)    (35.3)% 

EBITDA margin

   24.1%    34.8%     

Adjusted EBITDA

  $13,549       $19,481       $(5,932)    (30.5)% 

Adjusted EBITDA margin

   28.5%    38.3%     

Reis Services segment:

        

Total revenue

  $47,530       $50,890       $(3,360)    (6.6)% 

EBITDA

  $15,537       $22,074       $(6,537)    (29.6)% 

EBITDA margin

   32.7%    43.4%     

Revenue Performance - Metrics

In order to provide additional insight into our revenue, we have disaggregated total revenue into two components: “Subscription” and “Other.” Other revenue specifically includes revenue related to contracts forone-time custom data deliverables andone-time fees for settlements of previous unauthorized usage of Reis data. The following tables present subscription revenue, other revenue and total revenue for the three months and years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:

(amounts in thousands, excluding percentages)

   For the Three Months Ended December 31,     
   2017   2016   Variance 
   $   % of Total   $   % of Total   $   % 

Subscription revenue

  $11,839      96.5%   $11,339      98.1%   $500      4.4% 

Other revenue (A)

   424      3.5%    215      1.9%    209      97.2% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total revenue

  $12,263      100.0%   $11,554      100.0%   $709      6.1% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   
   For the Year Ended December 31,     
   2017   2016   Variance 
   $   % of Total   $   % of Total   $   % 

Subscription revenue

  $46,802      97.1%   $45,399      95.5%   $1,403      3.1% 

Other revenue (A)

   1,388      2.9%    2,131      4.5%    (743)     (34.9)% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total revenue

  $        48,190              100.0%   $        47,530              100.0%   $        660                  1.4% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

   For the Year Ended December 31,   

 

 
   2016   2015   Variance 
   $   % of Total   $   % of Total   $   % 

Subscription revenue

   $                45,399     95.5%   $43,722     85.9%   $1,677     3.8% 

Other revenue (A)

   2,131     4.5%    7,168     14.1%    (5,037)    (70.3)% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total revenue

   $                47,530             100.0%   $        50,890             100.0%   $        (3,360)              (6.6)% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

    (A)  Other revenue includes:(1) non-subscription custom data deliverables; and(2) one-time settlements.

2017 Revenue Performance

Subscription Revenue

For the fourth quarter of 2017, total revenue increased by approximately $709,000, or 6.1% over the fourth quarter of 2016. Total revenue increased by approximately $660,000 or 1.4% for the year ended December 31, 2017 over the comparable 2016 annual period. Subscription revenue increased 3.1% for the year ended December 31, 2017 over the 2016 period. The two factors that have led to our subscription revenue growth for the three months and year ended December 31, 2017, and our improving growth trajectory over the course of 2017, include: (1) improvement in our trailing twelve-month (“TTM”) renewal rates; and (2) new business.

Renewal Rates — The Company’s December 31, 2017 TTM base renewal rate, including price increases, was 88.3% (for institutional subscribers, the base renewal rate, including price increases, was 89.7%). For the TTM ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s base renewal rate, including price increases, was 85.7% (for institutional subscribers, the base renewal rate, including price increases, was 87.3%). During 2016, TTM renewal rates were negatively impacted by: the cancellation of contracts, primarily in the second quarter of 2016, associated with Reis’s intellectual property (“IP”) compliance initiatives; from subscribers that exited the CRE business; and in selected cases, in response to our aggressive repricing on contract expirations. As the Company has worked to improve customer retention, poorer performing quarterly renewal rates have been replaced with higher rates in 2017, resulting in the aforementioned TTM renewal rate improvements. Although there may be quarterly variability, management expects further renewal rate improvement for the annual 2018 period over 2017.

New Business— Reis experienced strong levels of new business bookings in 2017. Revenue in the fourth quarter of 40.8%2017 continued to be positively impacted by sales that were directly tied to recent product improvements, including wins associated with our expanded sales transaction database with investment sales brokers, property tax appeal firms and tax assessors.

Other Revenue

The Company’s other revenue includes:(1) non-subscription revenue custom data deliverables; and(2) one-time settlements. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, approximately 2.9% and 4.5%, respectively, of total revenue was generated fromone-time settlements (in 2017 and 2016), and custom data deliverables (in 2016 only). DefinedA description of the revenue from Intellectual Property settlements and custom data deliverables follows.

Intellectual Property Settlements— Reis continues to successfully resolve cases in which our intellectual property rights have been violated. In 2016 and 2017, the Company continued to be very active in protecting its intellectual property by pursuing firms and individuals who had previously gained unauthorized access to our services. The discovery of instances of unauthorized usage creates opportunities for Reis’s compliance team to engage in productive conversations with firms regarding ongoing access to Reis data in accordance with the terms and reconciliationsconditions of a subscription agreement. Reis has developed a programmatic approach to promptly resolving cases of unauthorized usage and has devoted significant client services and account management resources to increase the most comparable GAAP financial measures in this Management Summary are presented elsewhere in this Item 7.

Our cash balancerenewal rates of IP infringement related accounts to levels typical of all other Reis subscribers. As a result of these compliance procedures, the Company has grown by $7.2 million in 2014. This growth occurred while we invested approximately $3.8 million in our website and databases, and commenced a dividend program that returned approximately $3.7 million to shareholders in the last three quarters of the year. We expect to continuebeen able to generate significant cash in 2015. We will continuerevenue through eitherone-time settlement payments or by signing up thenon-complying firm or individual to prioritize growth through the introduction of new geographic markets and property types. On February 1, 2015, we launched coverage of 53 seniors housing markets, bringing our total coverage of this sector to 110 metropolitan areas. In May 2015, we will publish market reports and comparable property data on 100 student housing markets, Reis’s eighth property type. Development work is underway to launch two new property types in 2016: medical office buildings and affordable housing. We have demonstrated that we can invest prudently, grow revenues, EBITDA and our cash balance, while simultaneously rewarding our shareholders. On February 2, 2015 we announced an increase to our quarterly dividend from $0.11 per share to $0.14 per share.

Based upon several factors, including historical and anticipated report consumption, our account managers determine whether Reis and a subscriber are best served by an annual or multi-year commitment. OverReis SEsubscription.

Revenue fromone-time settlement payments aggregated $1,388,000 and $931,000 in the past three years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Throughout 2017, as our compliance team continued to identify instances of unauthorized access, the period of unauthorized usage being identified was much shorter and report consumption was not as significant as cases that were settled in prior years. Management believes that compliance resolutions will yield a continuing and significant volume of subscription contracts and recurring revenue for the foreseeable future.

Custom Data Deliverables— The Company recognized significant revenue in 2015 and in the first quarter of 2016 from custom data deliverables and related services for one of our existingReis SE subscribers. The revenue recorded reflected the portion of the custom

data files that was delivered in June and December 2015 and February 2016, positively impacting results for the second and fourth quarters of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016. Revenue related to these deliverables aggregated $1,200,000 in 2016 (all in the first quarter) and $4,519,000 in the year ended December 31, 2015.

In 2016, Reis did not replicate similar custom data sales. Custom data sales generally, and the large 2015 contract specifically, created a higher level of volatility in our 2015 and 2016 revenue and earnings. In 2017, management was able to identify other opportunities to sell custom data files, but structured these sales as subscription agreements with periodic quarterly updates in order to record revenue ratably, consistent with how the Company recognizes revenue forReis SE.

Deferred Revenue and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract

Two balance-sheet based metrics management utilizes are deferred revenue and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract. Analyzing these amounts can provide additional insight into the Company’s future financial performance. Deferred revenue, which is a GAAP basis accounting concept and is reported by the Company on the consolidated balance sheet, represents revenue from annual or longer term contracts for which we have billed and/or received payments from our subscribers related to services we will be providing over the remaining contract period. Aggregate Revenue Under Contract is the sum of deferred revenue and future revenue undernon-cancellable contracts for which we do not yet have the contractual right to bill and excludes any future revenues expected to be derived from subscribers currently being billed on a monthly basis.

Deferred revenue will be recognized as revenue ratably over the remaining life of a contract for subscriptions, or in the case of future custom reports or projects, will be recognized as revenue upon completion and delivery to the customer, provided no significant Company obligations remain. At any given date, both deferred revenue and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract can be either positively or negatively influenced by: (1) the timing and dollar value of contracts signed and billed; (2) the quantity and timing of contracts that are multi-year; and (3) the impact of recording revenue ratably over the life of a multi-year contract, which moderates the effect of price increases after the first year. The following table reconciles deferred revenue to Aggregate Revenue Under Contract at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

   December 31, 
  2017   2016 

Deferred revenue (GAAP basis)

  $        26,534,000   $        25,031,000 

Amounts undernon-cancellable contracts for which the Company does not yet have the contractual right to bill at the period end (A)

   25,470,000    25,928,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Aggregate Revenue Under Contract

  $52,004,000   $50,959,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     

(A)   Amounts are billable subsequent to December 31 of each year and represent(i) non-cancellable contracts for subscribers with multi-year subscriptions where the future years are not yet billable, or (ii) subscribers withnon-cancellable annual subscriptions with interim billing terms.

Included in Aggregate Revenue Under Contract at December 31, 2017 was approximately $35,878,000 related to amounts under contract for the forward twelve-month period through December 31, 2018. The remainder reflects amounts under contract beyond December 31, 2018. The forward twelve-month Aggregate Revenue Under Contract amount is approximately 74.5% of total revenue on a TTM basis at December 31, 2017. For comparison purposes, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, the forward twelve-month Aggregate Revenue Under Contract was $34,778,000 and $33,822,000, respectively, and as a percentage of that year’s total revenue was approximately 73.2% and 66.5%, respectively.

Multi-Year Contracts and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract —In order to increase the predictability of fees from our subscribers and Reis’s own revenue and cash flow, we have made a concerted effort to encourage multi-year contracts when appropriate, with terms of two or three years, and in some cases, four years. Over the past three years we have grown the percentage of revenue that is under multi-year contracts from approximately 33% at December 31, 2015 to 38% at December 31, 2016 and up to approximately 45% at December 31, 2017. The average life of multi-year contracts signed in each of the last threefour years iswas approximately 2.2 years. There are significant benefits, to adopting and expanding our program, on a selective basis, of lengthening the duration of clientmulti-year contracts, including locking in recurring subscription revenue for longer periods, thereby improving our renewal rates and increasing the predictability of our renewal rates and future revenues. From an operational perspective,Multi-year contracts can also positively influence deferred revenue and aggregate revenue under contract, particularly as the number of multi-year contracts grows year-over-year. Operationally, multi-year contracts free up account management resources to focus on subscribers requiring a higher level of attention and upselling opportunities across our account base. Finally, multi-year deals also insulate us from competitive pressures and increase the likeliness that Reis data and analytics will become embedded in the work flow of our clients.

In accordance with GAAP, our revenue recognition policy is to record revenue ratably over the life of a subscriber contract. Therefore any increases in the price of the subscription after the first year of a multi-year contract are considered in the total amount being straight-linedstraight-

lined over the contract term. If a multi-year contract includes pricing steps are built in on and after the first anniversary, of a multi-year contract, there will be increasing cash flow from the contract, but no growth in revenue during the subsequent years under that contract. At December 31, 2014, there are approximately 240 institutions signed to multi-year contracts, including many ofThere has been resulting variability in our largest subscribers. The reported levels of deferred revenue and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract of $22,885,000 and $45,402,000, respectively, suggest strong financial performance during 2015. However, the effect ofgrowth rates from having such a significant segment of our subscriber base under multi-year agreements will resultwhich negatively impacted 2016 performance and muted 2017 growth rates.

2016 Revenue Performance

Annual 2016 financial results for Reis presented a difficult comparison against the substantial revenue and financial growth of 2015. Reis’s performance in annual2016 relative to the results for 2015 was impacted by four main factors: (1) revenues associated with significant custom data deliverables in 2015; (2) a decline in the TTM renewal rates; (3) a reduction in revenue growth in 2015 that is more in line with the reported annual growth rates we generally experienced from 2010 through 2013. Moreover, the anticipated renewal ofIP compliance initiatives; and (4) multi-year contracts signed in 2013 and 2014 is expected to result in incrementaltheir flattening effect on growth in the latter part of 2015 and in 2016.rates.

Operationally, we will continue to invest in technology and build databases. Our employee headcount in the sales and operational groups will increase in 2015 and we will accelerate our marketing initiatives that were set in place in the latter part of 2014. These are sound investments that will further differentiate Reis in the world of U.S. commercial real estate market information providers. These continuing investments may cause temporary declines in our EBITDA margins in 2015, but we believe that any declines will be short term as we expect that these investments will result in additionalSubscription Revenue

Total revenue opportunities for Reis.

Please read the remainder of this Item 7 for additional detail about our critical business metrics, reconciliations of income from continuing operations to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliations of deferred revenue to Aggregate Revenue Under Contract, results of operations, our liquidity and capital resources, changes in cash flows and selected significant accounting policies.

Critical Business Metrics of the Reis Services Segment

Management considers certain metrics in evaluating the performance of the Reis Services segment. These metrics are revenue, revenue growth, EBITDA (which is earnings (defined as income (loss) from continuing operations) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), EBITDA growth, EBITDA margin, Adjusted EBITDA (which is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and stock based compensation) and Adjusted EBITDA margin. Other important metrics that management considers include the cash flow generation of the Reis Services business as well as the visibility into future performance as supported by our deferred revenue and other related metrics discussed in this Item 7.

Following is a presentation of revenue, EBITDA and EBITDA margin for the Reis Services segment and revenue, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and the related margins on a consolidated basis (excluding discontinued operations) (see below for a reconciliation of income from continuing operations to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for both the Reis Services segment and on a consolidated basis for each of the periods presented here).

(amounts in thousands, excluding percentages)     
   For the Three Months Ended         
   December 31,       Percentage 
   2014   2013   Increase   Increase 

Reis Services segment:

        

Revenue

  $10,726       $9,209       $1,517     16.5%        

EBITDA

  $4,410       $3,788       $622     16.4%        

EBITDA margin

   41.1%     41.1%      

Consolidated, excluding discontinued operations:

        

Revenue

  $10,726       $9,209       $1,517     16.5%        

EBITDA

  $3,631       $2,832       $799     28.2%        

EBITDA margin

   33.9%     30.8%      

Adjusted EBITDA

  $3,889       $3,211       $678     21.1%        

Adjusted EBITDA margin

   36.3%     34.9%      
   For the Three Months Ended         
       December 31,    
2014
       September 30,    
2014
           Increase                   Percentage        
Increase
 

Reis Services segment:

        

Revenue

  $10,726       $10,469       $257     2.5%        

EBITDA

  $4,410       $4,285       $125     2.9%        

EBITDA margin

   41.1%     40.9%      

Consolidated, excluding discontinued operations:

        

Revenue

  $10,726       $10,469       $257     2.5%        

EBITDA

  $3,631       $3,236       $395     12.2%        

EBITDA margin

   33.9%     30.9%      

Adjusted EBITDA

  $3,889       $3,673       $216     5.9%        

Adjusted EBITDA margin

   36.3%     35.1%      
   For the Years Ended         
   December 31,       Percentage 
   2014   2013   Increase   Increase 

Reis Services segment:

        

Revenue

  $41,335       $34,721       $6,614     19.0%        

EBITDA

  $16,852       $14,307       $2,545     17.8%        

EBITDA margin

   40.8%     41.2%      

Consolidated, excluding discontinued operations:

        

Revenue

  $41,335       $34,721       $6,614     19.0%        

EBITDA

  $12,760       $9,396       $3,364     35.8%        

EBITDA margin

   30.9%     27.1%      

Adjusted EBITDA

  $14,325       $11,337       $2,988     26.4%        

Adjusted EBITDA margin

   34.7%     32.7%      

(amounts in thousands, excluding percentages)     
   For the Years Ended         
   December 31,               Percentage         
   2013   2012   Increase   Increase 

Reis Services segment:

        

Revenue

  $                34,721       $                31,229       $                  3,492     11.2%        

EBITDA

  $14,307       $12,762       $1,545     12.1%        

EBITDA margin

   41.2%     40.9%      

Consolidated, excluding discontinued operations:

        

Revenue

  $34,721       $31,229       $3,492     11.2%        

EBITDA

  $9,396       $7,673       $1,723     22.5%        

EBITDA margin

   27.1%     24.6%      

Adjusted EBITDA

  $11,337       $9,968       $1,369     13.7%        

Adjusted EBITDA margin

   32.7%     31.9%      

2014 Revenue Performance

All of the Company’s revenue is generated by the Reis Services’s segment. Reis Services’s revenue increaseddecreased by approximately $1,517,000,$(3,360,000), or 16.5%(6.6)%, from the fourth quarter of 2013 to the fourth quarter of 2014 and $6,614,000, or 19.0%, forin the year ended December 31, 20142016 from the comparable 2015 period; however, subscription revenue in 2016 grew 3.8% over the comparable 20132015 annual period. The revenue increase over

Renewal Rates— For the corresponding prior quarterly period isTTM ended December 31, 2016, the 19th consecutive quarterly increaseCompany’s base renewal rate, including price increases, was 85.7% (for institutional subscribers, the base renewal rate, including price increases, was 87.3%). For the TTM ended December 31, 2015, the Company’s base renewal rate, including price increases, was 91.9% (for institutional subscribers, the base renewal rate, including price increases, was 93.9%). Reis’s 2016 TTM renewal rates were negatively impacted by the cancellation of contracts (most significantly in revenue over the prior year’s quarter. In addition, revenue increased by approximately $257,000, or 2.5%, from the thirdsecond quarter of 2014 to the fourth quarter of 2014. In general, these revenue increases2016) signed in 2014 reflect: and 2015 associated with Reis’s IP compliance initiatives, from customer losses from subscribers that exited the CRE business and from aggressive repricing on contract expirations.

Multi-Year Contracts— As stated above, we have been increasing the amount of revenue that is under multi-year contracts over each of the last three years. There has been resulting variability in our growth rates from having such a significant segment of our subscriber base under multi-year agreements which negatively impacted 2016 performance.

Other Revenue

The Company’s other revenue included:(1) additional newnon-subscription custom data deliverables; and(2) one-time settlements. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, approximately 4.5%, and 14.1%, respectively, of total revenue was generated from custom data deliverables andone-time settlements. A description of the revenue from custom data deliverables and Intellectual Property settlements follows.

Custom Data Deliverables— As noted above, the Company recognized significant revenue in 2015 from custom data deliverables and related services for one of our existingReis SE business; (2)subscribers. The revenue growthrecorded reflected the portion of the custom data files that was delivered in June and December 2015 and February 2016, positively impacting results for the second and fourth quarters of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016. Revenue related to these deliverables aggregated $1,200,000 in 2016 (all in the first quarter) and $4,519,000 in the year ended December 31, 2015.

Intellectual Property SettlementsRevenue from Mobiuss;one-time settlement payments aggregated $931,000 and (3) revenue growth fromReisReports.$2,649,000 in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Although identified instances ofnon-compliance remained steady, the frequency and dollar amount ofone-time settlements were lower in 2016 than in 2015.

2017 Earnings Metrics - Net (Loss) Income, Income before Income Taxes, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and Reis Services EBITDA

The Company’s revenue growth reflects not justCompany had a single strong quarter, but also the momentum created by sustained contract growth during 2013net (loss) of $(4,548,000) and throughout 2014. The Company continues to post record bookings performance with respect to the dollar value of contracts. Fiscal 2013, as well as the fourth quarter of 2013, represented unprecedented contract signings, surpassed again by 2014’s annual and fourth quarter results. The Company was able to achieve the revenue growth rates reported above while its renewal rates have been modestly trending lower over the past few quarters. The Company’s overall renewal rates were 87% and 91%$(230,000) for the trailing twelvethree months ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013, respectively (for institutional subscribers,2016, respectively. For the renewal rates were 89%years ended December 31, 2017 and 93%2016, the Company had a net (loss) of $(3,158,000) and net income of $2,781,000, respectively. The decrease of $4,318,000 and $5,939,000 in the three months and year ended December 31, 2017 is primarily due to an incremental income tax expense recorded at December 31, 2017 of $5,142,000 from the change in the Federal tax rate from 35% to 21% and the resulting reduction to the Company’s deferred tax assets to reflect the rate change (as required by the Tax Act). See additional information about revenue and expense variances in this Item 7 and for additional information on taxes, see Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements include elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K.

The Company reported income before income taxes of $1,038,000 and a (loss) before income taxes of $(141,000) for the trailing twelvethree months ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013, respectively).2016, respectively. The declineincrease in the renewal rates reflects the Company’s decision to be more aggressive on renewal pricing, particularly in instances where customer usage levels are significantly greater than what was initially estimated as annual usage for that customer. The Company believes that aligning client report consumption with appropriate annual fees, while remaining respectfulincome before income taxes of subscriber need for Reis information, is more important in the long-term, than a modest decline in the current renewal rate. Also, based upon past experience, management believes that many non-renewing customers ultimately renew with Reis as their information and analytic needs may not be fully addressed by competitive offerings.

Reis’s revenue model is based primarily on annual subscriptions that are paid in accordance with contractual billing terms. Reis recognizes revenue from its contracts on a ratable basis; for example, one-twelfth of the value of a one-year contract is recognized monthly. Therefore, increases in the dollar value of new contracts are spread evenly over the life of a contract, thereby moderating an immediate impact on revenue. Historically, the largest percentage of our contracts are executed$1,179,000 in the fourth quarter of each year and 2014 was not an exception to that trend.

2013 Revenue Performance

Reis Services’s revenue increased by approximately $3,492,000 or 11.2% for the year ended December 31, 20132017 over the 2016 comparable 2012 annual period. In general, theseperiod is primarily a result of the revenue increases reflected: (1) additional newReis SEbusiness; (2) revenue growthincrease of $709,000 (as described above), as well as operating expense decreases fromReis Reports; quarter to quarter of $765,000 (described below), offset by increased depreciation and (3) revenue fromMobiussamortization expense of

$254,000, increased stock-based compensation of $36,000 and an increase in the 2013 period. The Company’s overall renewal rate was 91% for the trailing twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (for institutional subscribers, the renewal rate was 93% fornet interest expense of $5,000. For the years ended December 31, 20132017 and 2012).

As we disclosed2016, the Company had income before income taxes of $2,433,000 and $4,734,000, respectively. The decrease of $(2,301,000) in prior filings including the Company’s 2013 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K and its quarterly reports filed during 2013, revenue forannual 2017 period from the 20122016 annual period included incremental revenueis primarily due to an increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $1,426,000 (associated with increased amortization from one specific custom projectdatabase and website development in 2017, as well as a full year’s worth of $569,000. Excluding this custom projectdepreciation expense in 2017 from our 2012 reported revenue would have resulted, on a pro forma basis,the leasehold improvements and other office assets associated with the new operations and corporate headquarters spaces in 2016), an increase in operating expenses of $1,382,000 (primarily from employment related cost increases), an increase in stock-based compensation of $112,000 and an increase in net interest expense of $41,000, offset by the $660,000 increase in revenue growth of 13.2% for the 2013 annual period over the 2012 annual period (in contrast with our reported growth rate of 11.2%)(as described above).

Deferred Revenue and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract

Two additional metrics management utilizes are deferred revenue and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract. Analyzing these amounts can provide additional insight into Reis Services’s future financial performance. Deferred revenue, which is a GAAP basis accounting concept and is reported by the Company on the consolidated balance sheet, represents revenue from annual or longer term contracts for which we have billed and/or received payments from our subscribers related to services we will be providing over the remaining contract period. It does not include future revenue under non-cancellable contracts for which we do not yet have the contractual right to bill; this aggregate number we refer to as Aggregate Revenue Under Contract. Deferred revenue will be recognized as revenue ratably over the remaining life of a contract. The following table reconciles deferred revenue to Aggregate Revenue Under Contract at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

   December 31, 
  2014   2013 

Deferred revenue (GAAP basis)

  $                22,885,000    $                20,284,000    

Amounts under non-cancellable contracts for which the Company does not yet have the contractual right to bill at the period end (A)

   22,517,000     20,046,000    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Aggregate Revenue Under Contract

  $45,402,000    $40,330,000    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

        

(A)

Amounts are billable subsequent to December 31 of each year and represent (i) non-cancellable contracts for subscribers with multi-year subscriptions where the future years are not yet billable, or (ii) subscribers with non-cancellable annual subscriptions with interim billing terms.

Included in Aggregate Revenue Under Contract at December 31, 2014 was approximately $30,516,000 related to amounts under contract for the forward twelve month period through December 31, 2015. The remainder reflects amounts under contract beyond December 31, 2015. The forward twelve month Aggregate Revenue Under Contract amount is approximately 74% of revenue on a trailing twelve month basis at December 31, 2014. For comparison purposes, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, the forward twelve month Aggregate Revenue Under Contract was $27,338,000 and $23,947,000, respectively, and as a percentage of that year’s revenue was approximately 79% and 77%, respectively.

Both deferred revenue and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract are influenced by: (1) the timing and dollar value of contracts signed and billed; (2) the quantity and timing of contracts that are multi-year; and (3) the impact of recording revenue ratably over the life of a multi-year contract, which moderates the effect of price increases after the first year. The then record new business and contract signings in 2013, exceeded by the historic level of new business contracted in 2014 and the increased number of multi-year contracts signed in 2014, has had a significant positive impact on our reported amounts of deferred revenue and Aggregate Revenue Under Contract at December 31, 2014.

2014 Reis Services EBITDA Performance

Reis Services’sConsolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 20142017 was $4,410,000,$3,784,000, an increase of $622,000,$1,474,000, or 16.4%63.8%, overfrom the fourth quarter 20132016 amount. The Reis Servicesincrease is a result of the quarterly revenue increase of $709,000 (as described above), as well as expense decreases from the 2016 period of $765,000. The expense reduction from the 2016 fourth quarter to 2017 is a result of a decrease in headcount and other cost efficiencies. Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA increase over the corresponding prior quarterly period is the 17th consecutive quarterly increase in Reis Services EBITDA over the prior year’s quarter. Forfor the year ended December 31, 2014, Reis Services EBITDA2017 was $16,852,000, an increase$12,827,000, a decrease of $2,545,000,$(722,000), or 17.8%, over the comparable 2013 period. On a consecutive quarter basis, Reis Services EBITDA increased $125,000, or 2.9%(5.3)%, from the third quartercomparable 2016 annual period. The decrease in consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2017 reflects increased operating expenses of 2014 to$1,382,000, offset by the fourth quarterannual revenue growth of 2014. These increases were primarily derived from the$660,000 (as described above). Operating expense increases in revenue, as described above. Operating expenses also continued to grow, the net effectannual 2017 period are a result of which resulted inemployment related cost increases over the Reis Services2016 period. The consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margins of 41.1%were 30.9% and 40.8%26.6% for the three months and year ended December 31, 2014,2017, respectively, consistent withas compared to the reported consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margins of 20.0% and 28.5% for the comparable 2016 periods.

Reis Services EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 2017 was $4,328,000, an increase of $1,663,000, or 62.4%, from the fourth quarter 2016 amount. The increase is a result of the quarterly revenue increase of $709,000, as well as expense decreases from the 2016 fourth quarter of $954,000. The expense reduction from the 2016 fourth quarter to 2017 is a result of a decrease in headcount and other cost efficiencies. Reis Services EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $15,134,000, a decrease of $(403,000), or (2.6)% from the comparable 2016 annual period. The decrease in Reis Services EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2017 reflects increased operating expenses of $1,063,000, offset by the annual revenue growth of $660,000. Operating expense increases in the annual 2017 period are a result of employment related cost increases over the 2016 period. Reis Services EBITDA margins were 35.3% and 31.4% for the three months and year ended December 31, 2017, respectively, as compared to the reported Reis Services EBITDA margins of 41.1%23.1% and 41.2%32.7% for the 2016 comparable periods.

2016 Earnings Metrics - Net Income, Income before Income Taxes and Discontinued Operations, Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and Reis Services EBITDA

Net income was $2,781,000 and $10,305,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease of $(7,524,000) in the 2013 comparable periods.

Investment in our business remainsyear ended December 31, 2016 is a priority. Thisresult of the $3,360,000 revenue decline from period to period and operating expense increases described below of $2,572,000, but also includes the developmentimpact of new productsincreased depreciation and functionality, introducing new, or expanding existing databases, adding resourcesamortization expense in the year ended December 31, 2016 over 2015 of $1,052,000 from increased amortizable website and database intangible assets and increased spending on furniture, fixtures and equipment. In addition, this includes the impact of increased stock-based compensation of $326,000 and an increase in net interest expense of $32,000, as well as a reduction in income from discontinued operations of $2,234,000 as a result of the finalization of activities from discontinued operations in the 2015 period. This is offset by a reduction in income tax expense (from lower taxable income in the 2016 periods) of $(2,052,000) in the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to grow our customer basethe corresponding 2015 period.

Income before income taxes and generate more revenue. Separately,discontinued operations was $4,734,000 and $12,076,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease of $(7,342,000) in the year ended December 31, 2016 is a result of the $3,360,000 revenue decline from period to period and operating expense increases described below of $2,572,000, but also includes the impact of increased depreciation and amortization expense in the year ended December 31, 2016 over 2015 of $1,052,000 from increased amortizable website and database intangible assets and increased spending on furniture, fixtures and equipment, as Reis’s business continuescompared to grow, we are devoting additional resources to expand our sales pipeline through marketing effortsthe corresponding 2015 period. In addition, this includes the impact of increased stock-based compensation of $326,000 and sales force expansion. The expectation for spendingan increase in 2015 may result in margins for future quarters being at or below the approximate 41% Reis Servicesnet interest expense of $32,000.

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margin we reported for the year ended December 31, 2014.2016 was $13,549,000, a decrease of $(5,932,000), or (30.5)%, from the comparable 2015 period. The decrease primarily resulted from the decline in total revenue of $3,360,000 as described above and the impact of total operating expenses, which grew by $2,572,000 from the comparable 2015 annual period. The consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margins were 28.5% and 38.3% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

2013 Reis Services EBITDA Performancefor the year ended December 31, 2016 was $15,537,000, a decrease of $(6,537,000), or (29.6)%, from the comparable 2015 period. This decrease primarily resulted from the decline in total revenue of $3,360,000 as described above. Total operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses) grew by $3,177,000, or 11.0%, in the year ended

Reis Services’s EBITDA

December 31, 2016. Expense increases are primarily due to increased $1,545,000, or 12.1%,employment related costs and rent related expenses. In particular, total rent expense increased $1,682,000 in the year ended December 31, 20132016, over the comparable 2012corresponding 2015 annual period. This amount reflects the increase was primarily derivedin both the square footage being leased and the higher price per square foot, and includes the effect of overlapping leases from the corresponding increaseduplication of rent and other occupancy costs (aggregating approximately $721,000 in 2013 revenue, as described above. Operating expenses also continuedthe year ended December 31, 2016). In addition, the Company incurred $118,000 of move related costs during the year ended December 31, 2016, which, with the effect of the duplication of rent, has contributed to grow, but at a pace which resultedthe reduction in theour EBITDA and EBITDA margins in those periods.

The Reis Services EBITDA margins being maintained at 41.2% and 40.9%margin was 32.7% for

the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Reis Services EBITDA2016 as compared to 43.4% for the 2015 period. The margin in the annual 2012 periodyear ended December 31, 2015 was similarlypositively impacted fromby the aforementioned incremental custom work. Excluding only that incremental customdata deliverables and other revenue fromitems described previously which had higher margins than our reported 2012 historic sales ofReis Services EBITDA wouldSEsubscriptions. The 2016 margins were lower than historic norms as a result on a pro forma basis, in Reis Services EBITDA growth of 17.3% for the 2013 annual period over the 2012 annual period (in contrast with our reported growth ratecombination of 12.1%).increased expenses and lower total revenue as discussed herein.

Reconciliations of Net Income from Continuing Operations to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

We define EBITDA as earnings (income(net income (loss) from continuing operations)) before discontinued operations, interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as earningsnet income (loss) before discontinued operations, interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and stock basedstock-based compensation. Although EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP, senior management uses EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to measure operational and management performance. Management believes that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are appropriate supplemental financial measures to be considered in addition to the reported GAAP basis financial information, which may assist investors in evaluating and understanding: (1) the performance of the Reis Services segment, the primary business of the Company and (2) the Company’s continuing consolidated results, from year to year or period to period, as applicable. Further, these measures provide the reader with the ability to understand our operational performance while isolatingnon-cash charges, such as depreciation and amortization expenses, as well as othernon-operating items, such as interest income, interest expense and income taxes and, in the case of Adjusted EBITDA, isolatesnon-cash charges for stock basedstock-based compensation. Management also believes that disclosing EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA will provide better comparability to other companies in the information services sector. However, because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not calculated in accordance with GAAP, they may not necessarily be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented both for the Reis Services segment and on a consolidated basis. We believe that these metrics, for Reis Services, provide the reader with valuable information for evaluating the financial performance of the core Reis Services business, excluding public company costs, and for making assessments about the intrinsic value of that stand-alone business to a potential acquirer. Management primarily monitors and measures its performance, and is compensated, based on the results of the Reis Services segment. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, on a consolidated basis, allow the reader to make assessments about the current trading value of the Company’s common stock, including expenses related to operating as a public company. However, investors should not consider these measures in isolation or as substitutes for net income (loss), income from continuing operations, operating income, or any other measure for determining operating performance that is calculated in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to the most comparable GAAP financial measure, income from continuing operations, follow for each identified period on a segment basis (including the Reis Services segment), as well as on a consolidated basis:

 

(amounts in thousands)    

Reconciliation of Income from Continuing Operations to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2014

  By Segment     
  Reis Services   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Income from continuing operations

      $1,524     

Income tax expense

       768     
      

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

$3,073     $(781)     2,292     

Add back:

Depreciation and amortization expense

 1,315      2      1,317     

Interest expense (income), net

 22      —      22     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

 4,410      (779)     3,631     

Add back:

Stock based compensation expense, net

 —      258      258     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$            4,410     $            (521)    $            3,889     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin – Reis Services and consolidated (B)

 41.1%   36.3%  
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Income from Continuing Operations to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

By Segment   
Reis Services Other (A) Consolidated 

Income from continuing operations

$4,616     

Income tax expense

 2,842     
      

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

$11,559     $(4,101)     7,458     

Add back:

Depreciation and amortization expense

 5,202      9      5,211     

Interest expense (income), net

 91      —      91     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

 16,852      (4,092)     12,760     

Add back:

Stock based compensation expense, net

 —      1,565      1,565     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$16,852     $(2,527)    $14,325     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin – Reis Services and consolidated (B)

 40.8%   34.7%  
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

            

See footnotes on next page.

      

(amounts in thousands)                

Reconciliation of Income from Continuing Operations to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2013

  By Segment     
Reis Services   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Income from continuing operations

      $16,304     

Income tax (benefit)

       (14,751)    
      

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

$2,511     $(958)     1,553     

Add back:

Depreciation and amortization expense

 1,251      2      1,253     

Interest expense (income), net

 26      —      26     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

EBITDA

 3,788      (956)     2,832     

Add back:

Stock based compensation expense, net

 —      379      379     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$            3,788     $            (577)    $            3,211     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin – Reis Services and consolidated (B)

 41.1%   34.9%  
  

 

     

 

 

Reconciliation of Income from Continuing Operations to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Year Ended December 31, 2013

By Segment   
Reis Services Other (A) Consolidated 

Income from continuing operations

$17,933     

Income tax (benefit)

 (13,670)    
      

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

$9,183     $(4,920)     4,263     

Add back:

Depreciation and amortization expense

 5,021      9      5,030     

Interest expense (income), net

 103      —      103     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

EBITDA

 14,307      (4,911)     9,396     

Add back:

Stock based compensation expense, net

 —      1,941      1,941     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$14,307     $(2,970)    $11,337     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin – Reis Services and consolidated (B)

 41.2%   32.7%  
  

 

     

 

 

Reconciliation of Income from Continuing Operations to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Year Ended December 31, 2012

By Segment   
Reis Services Other (A) Consolidated 

Income from continuing operations

$8,013     

Income tax (benefit)

 (5,427)    
      

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

$7,683     $(5,097)     2,586     

Add back:

Depreciation and amortization expense

 4,974      9      4,983     

Interest expense (income), net

 105      (1)     104     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

EBITDA

 12,762      (5,089)     7,673     

Add back:

Stock based compensation expense, net

 —      2,295      2,295     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$12,762     $(2,794)    $9,968     
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin – Reis Services and consolidated (B)

 40.9%   31.9%  
  

 

     

 

 

Reconciliation of Income from Continuing Operations to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014

By Segment   
Reis Services Other (A) Consolidated 

Income from continuing operations

$1,130     

Reconciliation of Net (Loss) to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2017

  By Segment     
Reis Services   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Net (loss)

      $(4,548)    

Income tax expense

 743            5,586     
      

 

       

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

$2,924     $(1,051)     1,873       $        2,136       $        (1,098)        1,038     

Add back:

      

Depreciation and amortization expense

 1,339      2      1,341        2,159        —         2,159     

Interest expense (income), net

 22      —      22        33        (1)        32     
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

EBITDA

 4,285      (1,049)     3,236        4,328        (1,099)        3,229     

Add back:

      

Stock based compensation expense, net

 —      437      437        —        555         555     
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$4,285     $(612)    $3,673       $4,328       $(544)       $        3,784     
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA margin – Reis Services and consolidated (B)

 40.9%   35.1%  
  

 

     

 

       

            
(A)
See footnotes on next page.

(amounts in thousands)            

Reconciliation of Net (Loss) to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

  By Segment     
  Reis Services   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Net (loss)

      $(3,158)     

Income tax expense

       5,591      
      

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $6,949       $(4,516)        2,433      

Add back:

      

Depreciation and amortization expense

   8,056        —         8,056      

Interest expense (income), net

   129        (2)        127      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

   15,134        (4,518)        10,616      

Add back:

      

Stock based compensation expense, net

   —        2,211         2,211      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $15,134       $(2,307)       $12,827      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Net (Loss) to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2016

  By Segment     
  Reis Services   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Net (loss)

      $(230)     

Income tax expense

       89      
      

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $733       $(874)        (141)     

Add back:

      

Depreciation and amortization expense

   1,905        —         1,905      

Interest expense (income), net

   27        —         27      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

   2,665        (874)        1,791      

Add back:

      

Stock based compensation expense, net

   —        519         519      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $2,665       $(355)       $2,310      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Year Ended December 31, 2016

  By Segment     
  Reis Services   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Net income

      $2,781      

Income tax expense

       1,953      
      

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $8,827       $(4,093)         4,734      

Add back:

      

Depreciation and amortization expense

   6,624        6         6,630      

Interest expense (income), net

   86        —         86      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

   15,537        (4,087)        11,450      

Add back:

      

Stock based compensation expense, net

   —        2,099         2,099      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $15,537       $(1,988)       $13,549      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Net Income to EBITDA and

Adjusted EBITDA for the Year Ended December 31, 2015

  By Segment     
  Reis Services   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Net income

      $10,305      

Income from discontinued operations

       (2,234)     
      

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

       8,071      

Income tax expense

       4,005      
      

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $16,451       $(4,375)        12,076      

Add back:

      

Depreciation and amortization expense

   5,569        9         5,578      

Interest expense (income), net

   54        —         54      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

   22,074        (4,366)        17,708      

Add back:

      

Stock based compensation expense, net

   —        1,773         1,773      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $        22,074       $        (2,593)       $        19,481      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
       

(A)   Includes interest and other income, depreciation expense and general and administrative expenses (including public company related costs) that are not associated with the Reis Services segment. Since the reconciliations start with income from continuing operations, the effects of the discontinued operations (Residential Development Activities) are excluded from these reconciliations for all periods presented.

(B)

Reflects an Adjusted EBITDA margin on the Reis Services segment and on a consolidated basis, both of which exclude the impact of discontinued operations.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the YearYears Ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016

Subscription revenuesTotal revenue and related cost of sales were approximately $41,335,000$48,190,000 and $8,037,000$12,565,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, which resulted in a gross profit for the Reis Services segment of approximately $33,298,000.$35,625,000. Amortization expense included in cost of sales (for the database intangible asset) was approximately $1,780,000$3,731,000 during this period. Subscription revenuesTotal revenue and related cost of sales were approximately $34,721,000$47,530,000 and $6,974,000,$10,999,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013, resulting2016, which resulted in a gross profit for the Reis Services segment of approximately $27,747,000.$36,531,000. Amortization expense included in cost of sales (for the database intangible asset) was approximately $1,547,000$2,853,000 during this period. See “— Critical Business Metrics of the Reis Services Segment”Metrics” for a discussion of the variances and trends in revenue and EBITDA of the Reis Services segment. The increase in cost of sales of $1,063,000$1,566,000 resulted from greater employment related costs, specifically from hiring during 20132016 and 2014, coupled with compensation increasesearly 2017 of $688,000, and higher benefit costs than in the 2013 period of $830,000, and a $233,000an $878,000 increase in amortization expense for database costs (from product enhancements such as a resultaffordable housing and the expansion of the addition of a new property typedata included in 2014 (seniors housing)our sales offerings).

Sales and marketing expenses were approximately $10,235,000$12,626,000 and $8,350,000$11,879,000 for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, and solely represented costs of the Reis Services segment. Amortization expense included in sales and marketing expenses (for the customer relationships intangible asset) was approximately $962,000$919,000 and $973,000$935,000 during the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. The increase in sales and marketing expenses between the two periods of approximately $1,885,000$747,000 resulted from greater employment related costs from hiring during 2013 and 2014 and increased commissions expense, coupled with compensation increases and higher benefit costs than in the 2013 period.2017 period of $763,000, including costs associated with new hires in sales management, sales enablement and marketing, offset by a $16,000 decrease in amortization expense for the customer relationships intangible asset.

Product development expenses were approximately $3,473,000$4,696,000 and $3,122,000$4,167,000 for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, and solely represented costs of the Reis Services segment. Amortization expense included in product development expenses (for the website intangible asset) was approximately $1,784,000$2,381,000 and $1,875,000$1,955,000 during the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. Product development costs increased $351,000,$529,000, primarily due to increased amortization expense for the website intangible asset of $426,000 and greater employment related costs from hiring during 2013, coupled with compensation increases and higher benefit costs than in the 20132017 period of $442,000, offset by a net $91,000 decrease in amortization expense for website costs due to the completion of amortization in the first half of 2013 related to significant prior year product releases (including the 2010 introduction of ReisReports and monthly publication of data).$103,000.

General and administrative expenses of approximately $12,040,000$15,743,000 for the year ended December 31, 20142017 included current period expenses of approximately $9,789,000,$12,507,000, depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $686,000$1,025,000 for lease value and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and approximately $1,565,000$2,211,000 of netnon-cash compensation expense. The netnon-cash compensation expense was comprised of equity awards for employees and directors of approximately $1,702,000, offset by a compensation benefit of approximately $137,000 related to the liability for option cancellations due to the final settlement in 2014 of the remaining 17,724 options accounted for in this manner.directors. General and administrative expenses of approximately $11,909,000$15,665,000 for the year ended December 31, 20132016 included current period expenses of approximately $9,333,000,$12,679,000, depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $635,000$887,000 for the lease value intangible asset and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and approximately $1,941,000$2,099,000 of netnon-cash compensation expense. The net non-cash compensation expense was comprised of equity awards for employees and directors of approximately $1,859,000 and by an approximate $82,000 increase in the liability for option cancellations due to an increase in the market price of the Company’s common stock from $13.03 per share at December 31, 2012 to $19.23 per share at December 31, 2013. Excluding thenon-cash expenses, the net increasedecrease in general and administrative expenses of $456,000$172,000 was primarilydue to reduced legal fees and lower occupancy costs in 2017, offset by greater employment related costs in 2017. The net increase in depreciation expense of $138,000 in 2017 over the corresponding 2016 period is a result of increased employment related costs, additional rent expensethe build out and increased professional fees, partially offset by a reductionfurnishing of our new corporate headquarters which was completed in public company segment related costs from 2013 to 2014.October 2016.    

Interest expense of $113,000 during$130,000 and $108,000 for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, respectively, was comprised of unused facility fees and deferred financing cost amortization on the Revolver, which the Company obtained in October 2012 and as more fully described in “— Debt” in this Item 7.Revolver. There was no outstanding balance on the Revolver during 2014 or 2013.2017 and 2016.

The aggregate incomeIncome tax expense applicable to continuing operations was $2,842,000of $5,591,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014, which2017 reflected deferred Federal tax expense of $5,736,000, current Federal AMT of $20,000 and current state and local tax expense of $302,000, current Federal alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) of $110,000 and a deferred Federal provision of $2,434,000,$225,000, offset by a deferred state and local tax benefit of $4,000. During$(390,000). Income tax expense of $1,953,000 during the year ended December 31, 2013, the net income tax benefit from continuing operations of $13,670,000 included the aggregate2016 reflected deferred Federal tax expense of $1,704,000, current Federal AMT state and local income tax benefit of $15,217,000 as a result of the release of the remaining valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets, offset by a$147,000, current state and local tax provisionexpense of $164,000, current Federal AMT of $53,000,$40,000, and deferred Federal, Federal AMT, state and local tax expenses aggregating $1,330,000.

expense of $62,000.

The loss from discontinued operations was $(569,000)Tax expense and the effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 20142017 was significantly impacted by the effects of the Tax Cuts and primarily reflected legalJobs Act (the “Tax Act”), enacted on December 22, 2017 by the U.S. Federal government. Among other provisions, the Tax Act reduced the federal corporate tax rate to 21% from the existing maximum rate of 35%, effective January 1, 2018. We remeasured our deferred tax assets as a result of the Federal rate reduction and professional feesrecorded a provisional estimate of $977,000 in connection with our recovery efforts (related to the 2012 Gold Peak settlement of $17,000,000), offset by $26,000 of recoveries during the period and an income tax benefit of $382,000. The loss from discontinued operations was $(336,000) for the year ended$5,142,000 at December 31, 20132017 to reduce the deferred tax asset balance. While we are able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of the reduction in the Federal corporate rate, the final impact of the Tax Act may differ from these estimates, including, but not limited to, changes in our interpretations and primarily reflected $646,000 of legalassumptions, additional guidance that may be issued by the IRS, and professional fees in connection with our recovery efforts relatedreturn to provision differences and state rate adjustments. We are continuing to gather additional information to determine the Gold Peak settlement, offset by $80,000 of recoveries during the period and an income tax benefit of $230,000.final impact.

Comparison of the Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

Subscription revenuesTotal revenue and related cost of sales were approximately $34,721,000$47,530,000 and $6,974,000,$10,999,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, which resulted in a gross profit for the Reis Services segment of approximately $27,747,000.$36,531,000. Amortization expense included in cost of sales (for the database intangible asset) was approximately $1,547,000$2,853,000 during this period. Subscription revenuesTotal revenue and related cost of sales were approximately $31,229,000$50,890,000 and $6,617,000,$9,081,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, which resulted in a gross profit for the Reis Services segment of approximately $24,612,000.$41,809,000. Amortization expense included in cost of sales was approximately $1,907,000$2,103,000 during this period. See “— Critical Business Metrics of the Reis Services Segment” in this Item 7Metrics” for a discussion of the variances and trends in revenue and EBITDA of the Reis Services segment. The increase in cost of sales of $357,000$1,918,000 resulted from greater employment related costs, specifically from hiring during 20122015 and 2013,2016, coupled with compensation increases and higher benefit costs than in the 20122015 period offset byof $1,168,000 and a reduction$750,000 increase in amortization expense of $360,000 from the Merger related purchase price allocations for the database intangible asset becoming fully amortized in the second quarter of 2012.costs.

Sales and marketing expenses were approximately $8,350,000$11,879,000 and $7,643,000$11,701,000 for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, and solely representrepresented costs of the Reis Services segment. Amortization expense included in sales and marketing expenses (for the customer relationships intangible asset) was approximately $973,000$935,000 and $982,000$949,000 during the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. The net increase in sales and marketing expenses between the two periods of approximately $707,000$178,000 resulted from greaterincreases in employment related costs due to additional headcount related to hiring in sales management, sales enablement and marketing, offset by lower commission expense from hiring during 2012 and 2013, coupled with compensation increases and higher benefit costs thanthe large custom data sale in the 20122015 period (with no sale of a corresponding magnitude in the 2016 period) and lower performance based bonus accruals in the 2016 period.

Product development expenses were approximately $3,122,000$4,167,000 and $2,485,000$3,711,000 for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively, and solely representrepresented costs of the Reis Services segment. Amortization expense included in product development expenses (for the website intangible asset) was approximately $1,875,000$1,955,000 and $1,436,000$1,793,000 during the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Product development costs increased $637,000$456,000, primarily due to a $439,000 increase in amortization expense for website costs capitalized and amortization expense which commenced in the period for significant product introductions and improvements during 2012 and in May 2013, with the remainder from increased employment related costs from hiring during 20122015 and 2013,2016, coupled with compensation increases and higher benefit costs than in the 2012 period.2015 period of $294,000 and a $162,000 increase in amortization expense.

General and administrative expenses of approximately $11,909,000$15,665,000 for the year ended December 31, 20132016 included current period expenses of approximately $9,333,000,$12,679,000, depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $635,000$887,000 for the lease value intangible asset and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and approximately $1,941,000$2,099,000 of netnon-cash compensation expense. The netnon-cash compensation expense was comprised of equity awards for employees and directors of approximately $1,859,000 and by an approximate $82,000 increase in the liability for option cancellations due to an increase in the market price of the Company’s common stock from $13.03 per share at December 31, 2012 to $19.23 per share at December 31, 2013.directors. General and administrative expenses of approximately $11,793,000$14,267,000 for the year ended December 31, 20122015 included current period expenses of approximately $8,840,000,$11,762,000, depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $658,000$732,000 for the lease value intangible asset and furniture, fixtures and equipment, and approximately $2,295,000$1,773,000 of netnon-cash compensation expense. The net non-cash compensation expense was comprised of equity awards for employees and directors of approximately $2,181,000 and by an approximate $114,000 increase in the liability for option cancellations due to an increase in the market price of the Company’s common stock from $9.12 per share at December 31, 2011 to $13.03 per share at December 31, 2012. Excluding thenon-cash expenses, the net increase in general and administrative expenses of $493,000$917,000 was primarily a resultinfluenced by increased occupancy related costs from the office space expansion (approximately $1,682,000, of which $721,000 was the effect of overlapping leases and the duplication of rent expense), increases for legal fees (approximately $374,000), move related costs (approximately $118,000) and increased public company segmentemployment related professional fees, additional rentcosts and other general expenses (approximately $290,000), offset by lower performance based bonus expense in the 2013 period employment related costs from hiring during the later part of 2012, coupled with compensation increases and higher benefit costs than in the 2012 period.(approximately $1,547,000).

Interest expense of $113,000$108,000 and $92,000 for the yearyears ended December 31, 20132016 and 2015, respectively, was comprised of unused facility fees and deferred financing cost amortization on the Company’s Revolver, which the Company obtained in October 2012 and as more fully described in “— Debt” in this Item 7.Revolver. There was no outstanding balance on the Revolver during 2016 or 2015.

Income tax expense of $1,953,000 during the year ended December 31, 2013 or during the period October 16, 2012 to December 31, 2012. Interest2016 reflected deferred Federal tax expense of $155,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 was comprised of interest and deferred financing cost amortization of $128,000 on the Bank Loan and $27,000 of unused facility fees and deferred financing cost amortization on the Revolver. In the second quarter of 2012, the Bank Loan was repaid and that obligation was cancelled.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the net income tax benefit from continuing operations of $13,670,000 included the aggregate deferred Federal, Federal AMT, state and local income tax benefit of $15,217,000 as a result of the release of the remaining valuation allowance against the Company’s deferred tax assets, offset by a current state and local tax provision of $164,000,$1,704,000, current Federal AMT of $53,000, deferred Federal, Federal AMT, state and local tax expenses aggregating $1,330,000. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the net income tax benefit from continuing operations of $5,427,000 included the aggregate deferred Federal, state and local income tax benefit of $5,614,000 as a result of the partial release of the valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets, offset by$147,000, current state and local tax expense of $187,000 arising from the changes in that year of the Company’s treatment of NOLs reflected on certain$40,000, and deferred state and local tax returns. In the fourth quartersexpense of 2013 and 2012, the Company reduced the valuation allowance recorded against a portion$62,000. Income tax expense of its NOL carryforwards. The decisions to reduce the valuation allowance in each period were made after management determined, based on an assessment of$4,005,000 for continuing operations profitabilityduring the year ended December 31, 2015 reflected deferred Federal tax expense of $3,832,000, current state and forecastslocal tax expense of future taxable income, that these$452,000 and current Federal AMT of $234,000, offset by a deferred state and local tax assets would be realized.benefit of $513,000. The deferred state and local tax benefit reflected a change in the New York City law which resulted in a variation between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate in the period.

The lossIncome from discontinued operations was $(336,000)$2,234,000 for the year ended December 31, 20132015 and primarily reflected $646,000$4,839,000 of recoveries from settlements with certain parties to the Gold Peak litigation (as more fully described in Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K), offset by legal and professional fees in connection with our recovery efforts related to the Gold Peak settlement, offset by $80,000 of recoveries during that period$1,196,000 and an income tax benefitexpense of $230,000. The loss from$1,409,000. There were no discontinued operations of $(12,297,000) foractivities in the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily was comprised of a net charge of $12,260,000 related to the June 2012 settlement of the Gold Peak litigation for $17,000,000, plus other professional fees and expenses of $750,000, offset by $713,000 of recoveries in December 2012.2016 period.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The net deferred tax asset was approximately $22,437,000 $12,072,000

and $23,789,000$16,815,000 at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, all of which $3,798,000 and $2,472,000 is reflectedwas classified as a net current asset in prepaid and other assets and $18,639,000 and $21,317,000 is reflected separately as a net non-current asset in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, respectively.non-current. The significant portion of the deferred tax items relates to deferred tax assets including NOL carryforwards, Federal AMT credit carryforwards and stock basedstock-based compensation, with the remainder of the deferred tax items relating to liabilities resulting from the intangible assets recorded at the time of the Merger. The significant component of the decrease in the deferred tax asset value in 2017 is due to there-measurement as described above.

The Company hashad Federal NOL carryforwards aggregating approximately $61,165,000$37,859,000 at December 31, 2014,2017, as well as significant state and local NOL carryforwards. These NOLs include NOLsincluded amounts generated subsequent to the Merger (including a substantial NOL realized during the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the Gold Peak litigation settlement, discussed in Note 3 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K), losses from the Reis Services business prior to the Merger and the Company’s operating losses prior to the Merger. Approximately $20,317,000$5,140,000 of these Federal NOLs are subject to an annual Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limitation of $2,779,000, whereas the remaining balance of approximately $40,848,000$32,719,000 is not subject to suchthe limitation. The enactment of a limitation. There is an annual limitation on the use of NOLs after an ownership change, pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result of the Merger, the Company experienced such an ownership change which resulted in a new annual limitation of $2,779,000. Because of the accumulation of annual limitations, it is expected that the use of NOLs will not be limited by expiration. A 2014 New York State law and the anticipated conforming changes to thea 2015 New York City law limitsdiscussed above limit the amount of existing NOLs which could be used each year in those jurisdictions; however, all such lossesNOLs are expected to be fully utilized in the future. A substantial NOL was realized during the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the Gold Peak litigation settlement, as discussed in Note 10 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

A further requirement of the tax rules is that after a corporation experiences an ownership change, it must satisfy the continuity of business enterprise, or COBE, requirement (which generally requires that a corporation continue its historic business or use a significant portion of its historic business assets in its business for the two year period beginning on the date of the ownership change) to be able to utilize NOLs generated prior to such ownership change. The Company believes that the COBE requirement was met through the required two year period subsequent to the ownership change. In February 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) completed an audit of the Company’s 2009 Federal income tax return. The 2009 tax year included the end of the two year period subsequent to the Merger. The IRS issued a no change letter related to the Company’s 2009 tax return, thereby accepting the Company’s position that the two year COBE requirement was met.

The next NOL expiration for the Company is in 20182024 for approximately $252,000$2,513,000 of Federal NOLs. Included in the Federal NOLs at December 31, 20142017 is approximately $1,723,000 attributable to excess tax deductions fromon equity award activity in prior years. Prior to January 1, 2017, the issuance of common shares as non-cash compensation. The tax benefits attributable to those NOLs will bewere credited directly to additional paid in capital when utilized to offset taxes payable. In 2017, these NOLs were recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet upon adoption of ASU2016-09 (as more fully described in Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K).

A valuation allowance is required to reduce deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of theall available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As a result of management’s evaluation of the Company’s future operations, it has been determined that no valuation allowance was necessary at either December 31, 2014 or 2013. Management

determined that a valuation allowance of approximately $15,217,000 was necessary at December 31, 2012. The allowance at December 31, 2012 related primarily to NOL carryforwards2017 and AMT credits. The decrease in the allowance in 2012 was primarily attributable to the $5,614,000 increase in deferred tax assets expected to be realized in the years subsequent to December 31, 2012, offset in part by the litigation settlement payments made in 2012, net of recoveries, which resulted in an increase to the 2012 NOL.

As part of its assessment to reduce the valuation allowance and reflect deferred tax assets on the consolidated balance sheet in each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, management considered many factors, including: the completion of sales of assets in its discontinued operations segment in 2011; the trend of pre-tax income from both continuing operations and income before taxes, on a consolidated basis (without consideration of discontinued operations reporting); and the predictability of future pre-tax income. The Company considered the predictability of future pre-tax income for the next five years in its 2012 and 2013 assessments. Based upon these factors, and consideration of uncertainties that could affect the ultimate usability of the deferred tax assets, management concluded to record an aggregate deferred tax asset of $23,789,000 and $9,622,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, with no valuation allowance at December 31, 2013. For the 2012 assessment, management was unable to conclude that all of its deferred tax assets would be realized, and therefore maintained a valuation allowance of approximately $15,217,000 at December 31, 2012. The Company performed a similar assessment in 2014 and concluded that a valuation allowance was not required at December 31, 2014. In order to be able to realize the deferred tax assets in the future, the Company considered its historic trend in revenue and EBITDA growth rates, the expected level of future amortization and depreciation expense and the expectation that there should be minimal financial impact from the discontinued operations. If revenue and EBITDA growth is not achieved to the extent expected, or at all, if EBITDA margins materially decline, or if material losses occur as a result of our discontinued operations, the ability to fully utilize these assets in future years could be negatively affected. There is no expectation of future taxable income being derived from a source other than ordinary and recurring operations of the Company’s business to be able to utilize deferred tax assets.2016.

The Company’s reserve for unrecognized tax benefits, including estimated interest, was $105,000$31,000 and $62,000$154,000 at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. The unrecognized tax benefits as well as related interest was included in general and administrative expenses. The Company recorded an additional provision,expense, including interest, of $43,000$3,000 in 2017, a reduction in expense of $(4,000) in 2016 and $51,000additional expense, including interest, of $70,000 in 2014 and 2013, respectively.2015.

For additional information related to income taxes, see Note 76 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Debt

The Company had no debt outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Revolver

In October 2012, Reis Services, as borrower, and the Company, as guarantor, entered into a loan and security agreement with Capital One, National Association, as lender, for a $10,000,000 revolving credit facility, which we refer to as the Revolver. The Revolver has a three year term which is set to expirestatements contained elsewhere in this annual report on October 16, 2015, and any borrowings bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 2.00% per annum (for LIBOR loans) or the greater of 1.00% or the bank’s prime rate minus 0.50% per annum (for base rate loans) and is subject to an unused facility fee of 0.25% per annum. The Company paid a commitment fee of $50,000 in connection with the closing. The Revolver is secured by a security interest in substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of Reis Services and a pledge by the Company of its membership interests in Reis Services. The Revolver also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum financial covenants, as defined in the agreement; all of the covenants were met at December 31, 2014 and 2013. No borrowings were made on the Revolver during the years ended December 31, 2014 , 2013 or 2012.Form10-K.

During 2015, the Company may consider, based on market conditions and business needs, refinancing or otherwise amending or replacing the Revolver, though there can be no assurance that the Company will do so, or be able to do so on terms acceptable to the Company.

Bank Loan

During 2012, the Company repaid the remaining outstanding balance of $5,691,000 in connection with borrowings under a credit agreement, dated October 11, 2006, with the Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch, as administrative agent, and BMO Capital Markets, as lead arranger. Loan proceeds were used to finance $25,000,000 of the cash portion of the Merger consideration. The final scheduled maturity date of all amounts borrowed pursuant to the credit agreement was September 30, 2012. The interest rate during 2012 was LIBOR + 1.50%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The core Reis Services business has traditionally generated significant cash annually; and we expect it to continue to do so. Our consolidated cash and cash equivalents balance aggregated approximately $17,745,000$19,671,000 at December 31, 2014, an increase2017, a decrease of $7,185,000 over$(1,820,000) from the December 31, 20132016 balance of approximately $10,560,000. The$21,491,000. Although the Company was able to increasehad cash flows provided by its operating activities of $16,156,000, the Company’s cash position decreased in 2014 by 68% while meeting all of its operational costs and obligations,2017 as a result of: (1) making investments in its websites and databases andof $8,583,000, (2) paying an aggregate dividenddividends of approximately $3,698,000$7,876,000, (3) repurchasing approximately $3,421,000 of the Company’s common stock under the repurchase program, and (4) spending on tenant improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment of approximately $1,030,000. This was partially offset by the receipt of $2,935,000 in 2014.

Our cash balance decreased significantly duringproceeds associated with the exercise of 285,000 options in the year ended December 31, 2012 from the $17,000,000 settlement of the Gold Peak litigation and the repayment of approximately $5,691,000 of outstanding debt. Cash generation of the Reis Services business in 2013 and 2014 has been solely responsible for the replenishment of our cash balance. In addition to the cash generation of the Reis Services business, in October 2012, the Company obtained the three year $10,000,000 Revolver to provide working capital flexibility; no borrowings have been made on the Revolver since it was obtained. Separately, the Company is seeking recovery under all available insurance policies, and is pursuing appropriate additional actions against other potentially responsible parties related to Gold Peak. To date, these efforts have resulted in the recovery of approximately $819,000 of cash through December 31, 2014. There can be no assurance that the Company will recover any additional amounts in the short or long-term from these efforts.2017.

At December 31, 2014,2017, the Company’s short-term and long-term liquidity requirements include: current operating and capitalizable costs, including accounts payable and other accrued expenses; near-term product development and enhancement of the website and databases either through building with Company resources or through acquisitions; operating leases; growth in operating expenses, from aincluding possible further increase in the number of Reis employees and additional resources being devoted to our sales and marketing efforts; insurance deductibles and legal costs related to discontinued operations; other costs, including public company expenses not included in the Reis Services segment; the resolution of open tax years with state and local tax authorities; payment of employee taxes on vested equity awards, for which the employee uses shares to settle his/her minimum withholding tax obligations with the Company; and the use of cash for the payment of quarterly dividends. The Company expects to meet these short-term liquidity requirements generally through the use of available cash and cash generated from subscription revenue of Reis Services and, if necessary, with borrowings under the Revolver or a replacement facility, and/or proceeds from the sale of Reis stock. During 2015, the Company may consider, based on market conditions and business needs, refinancing or otherwise amending or replacing the Revolver, though there can be no assurance we will do so, or be able to do so on terms acceptable to us. There could be additional cash inflows from insurance recoveries, or from other potentially responsible parties, related to the Gold Peak litigation; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will recover any additional amounts in the short or long-term. The Company has NOLs that it expects to be able to use over many years against future Federal, state and local taxable income, if any. Tax payments related to 2015 are expected to be for alternate state and local taxes and Federal AMT, but generally not for Federal, state or local taxes on income. In 2015 and thereafter, as a result of the new tax law enacted in New York State in March 2014, the use of certain NOLs for New York State purposes will be subject to an annual limitation and, therefore, any taxes in excess of the limitation will need to be paid in those periods.

The Company’s long-term liquidity requirements, beyond 2015, may include: future operating and capitalizable costs, including accounts payable and other accrued expenses; long-term product development and enhancements of the websites and databases, either through building with Company resources or through acquisitions; operating leases and other capital expenditures; growth in operating expenses from a further increase in the number of Reis employees and additional resources being devoted to our sales and marketing efforts; other costs, including public company expenses not included in the Reis Services segment; the resolution of open tax years with state and local tax authorities; the possiblepayment of state and local taxes based on income (in excess of limitation amounts) and tax on capital; payment of employee taxes on vested equity awards, for which the employee uses shares to settle his/her minimum withholding tax obligations with the Company; and the use of cash for the payment of quarterly dividends.dividends; and repurchases of shares of Reis common stock (at December 31, 2017, approximately $435,000 remained available to be purchased under our current authorization). The Company expects to meet these short-term and long-term liquidity requirements generally through the use of available cash and cash generated from subscription revenue of Reis Services and, if necessary, with borrowings under a replacement revolving credit facility,the Revolver, and/or proceeds from the sale of Reis stock. There could be

In January 2016, Reis Services and Capital One executed an amended and restated loan and security agreement for a $20,000,000 revolving credit facility, which expires on January 28, 2019. For additional cash inflows from insurance recoveries, or from other potentially responsible parties, both relatedinformation regarding the Revolver, see Note 5 to the Gold Peak litigation; however, there canCompany’s consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K.

On June 24, 2015, the Company’s shelf registration statement on FormS-3 was declared effective. The shelf registration statement permits the offering, issuance and sale of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of $75,000,000 of the Company’s stock from time to time for three years through June 24, 2018. Any determinations about the issuance of new common shares will be no assurance thatat the Companydiscretion of the Company’s Board and the use of proceeds, unless otherwise indicated, will recover any additional amountsbe for general corporate purposes, which may include working capital, capital expenditures or acquisitions. Management will retain broad discretion in the short or long-term. allocation of the net proceeds. The Company has no immediate plans to issue shares under the shelf registration statement.

The Company has NOLs that it expects to be able to use beyond the next few yearsutilize against future Federal, state and local taxable income, if any. Tax payments related to 2015 and beyond are expected to be for alternative state and local taxes and Federal AMT, but generally not for Federal, state or local taxes on income. In 2015 and thereafter, as a result of the new tax law enacted in New York State in March 2014, theThe use of certain NOLs for New York State and New York City purposes will be subject to an annual limitation and, therefore, any taxestaxable income in excess of the limitation will needbe subject to tax. Tax payments related to 2018 are expected to be paidfor state and local taxes based on income, in those periods.excess of limitation amounts, and tax on capital. In 2021, the Company expects that it could receive approximately $1,737,000 of cash from existing AMT NOLs that will not be utilized prior to that time as described under the Tax Act.

The Company may determine to use its cash to: (1) acquire or invest in other databases or information companies that have logical adjacencies or complementary products or services; (2) repurchase additional shares of Reis common stock; or (3) pay a special dividend, or increase its recurring quarterly dividend. There can be no assurance that the Company will use its cash for any of these purposes during 20152018, or thereafter.

Material Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes material contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014:2017:

 

(amounts in thousands)  Payments Due   Payments Due 
  For the Years Ending December 31,           For the Years Ending December 31,   Thereafter   Aggregate 

Contractual Obligations

          2015               2016 and 2017           2018 and 2019             Thereafter               Aggregate         2018   2019 and 2020   2021 and 2022   

Principal and interest payments for the Revolver (A)

  $19        $—        $—        $—        $19        $50     $—     $—     $—     $50   

Future contractual minimum operating lease payments (B)

   1,896         1,709         386         —         3,991         3,422      6,884      7,211      8,083      25,600   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total contractual obligations

  $1,915        $1,709        $386        $—        $4,010        $            3,472     $            6,884     $            7,211     $            8,083     $            25,650   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(A)

Includes unused facility fees of $50,000 for 2015.

2018.
(B)

For additional information related to the Company’s operating leases, see Item 2. Properties.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have anyoff-balance sheet liabilities or obligations which are required to be disclosed by the SEC’s rules and regulations.

Discontinued Operations Impact on Liquidity

Cash flows from discontinued operations during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 20122015 were included in the consolidated statements of cash flows in the operating activities section in accordance with the applicable accounting literature. Cash flows used infrom discontinued operations during 2014 was2015 were a net outflowinflow of approximately $989,000,$3,724,000, including $1,015,000$4,779,000 of recoveries, offset by $1,055,000 of cash used for legal and professional fees incurred as part of our cash recovery efforts from insurance companies and other potentially responsible parties offset by $26,000in connection with the Gold Peak litigation. As of recoveries. Cash flows used in discontinued operations during 2013 was a net outflow of approximately $673,000, including $753,000 of cash used for legal and professional fees, offset by $80,000 of recoveries. Cash flows during 2012 primarilyDecember 31, 2015, the Company entered into the final settlement agreement related to its Gold Peak recovery efforts, bringing closure to this process. Therefore, there were comprised of the $17,000,000 of settlement payments, plus legal costs paid, offset by $713,000 of recoveries. Futureno cash flows from discontinued operations will be solely comprised of expenditures incurred as part of our cash recovery efforts from insurance companiesduring the years ended December 31, 2016 and other potentially responsible parties and, to the extent that we are successful in these efforts, cash inflows from any future recoveries; however, there can be no assurance that the Company will recover any amounts in the short or long-term.

2017. For additional information pertaining to our discontinued operations, see Note 3 and Note 10 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for additional information pertaining to the Gold Peak litigation.contained elsewhere in this annual report on Form10-K.

Other Items Impacting Liquidity

Dividends

The Company commenced a quarterly dividend program in the second quarter of 2014 when it declared and paid an initial quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per common share in June 2014. Inshare. The Company increased the third and fourth quarters of 2014, the Companydividends declared and paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.11to $0.14 per common share in eachfor all four quarters of September 20142015, and December 2014. Aggregate dividendsincreased the dividend declared and paid to $0.17 per common share for all four quarters of 2016 and 2017. Dividends paid by the Company during 2014 approximated $3,698,000. On February 2,aggregated approximately $7,876,000, $7,747,000 and $6,338,000, for the years ended

December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company announced that it has increased the dividend payable on March 18, 2015 to $0.14 per common share.respectively. Although the Company anticipates paying a quarterly dividend hereafter, future dividends are subject to approval by the Board.

Stock Repurchase Program

On August 30, 2016, the Company’s Board authorized a repurchase program of shares of the Company’s common stock up to an aggregate of $5,000,000. Purchases under the program may be made from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Depending on market conditions, financial developments and other factors, these purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time, or from time to time, without prior notice and may be expanded without prior notice. The Company may make purchases pursuant to a trading plan under Securities Exchange Act Rule10b5-1, permitting open market purchases of common stock during blackout periods.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company purchased an aggregate of 182,028 shares of common stock for approximately $3,421,000, or an average price of $18.80 per share, leaving approximately $435,000 at December 31, 2017 that may be used to purchase additional shares under the repurchase program in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company purchased an aggregate of 54,176 shares of common stock for approximately $1,144,000, or an average price of $21.11 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company did not declare or distributerepurchase any dividends during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.shares of common stock.

Stock Plans and Options Accounted for as Liability Awards

The Company has adopted certain incentive plans for the purpose of attracting and retaining the Company’s directors, officers and employees by having the ability to issue options, restricted stock units (or “RSUs”),RSUs, or stock awards. Awards granted under the Company’s incentive plans expire ten years from the date of grant and vest over periods ranging generally from three to five years for employees.

Certain outstanding options had allowedIn 2016 and 2015, the option holderBoard authorized the use of cash to receive fromsettle minimum employee withholding tax obligations on vested RSUs in the respective periods. The net effect was a reduction on the issuance of shares at those vesting dates. The Company utilized approximately $701,000 and $993,000 of cash in 2016 and 2015, respectively, in connection with RSU vestings. Unlike the RSU vestings in 2016 and 2015, for RSUs vesting in 2017 and February 2018, the Company in cancellation of the holder’s option, adid not use cash payment with respect to each cancelled option equal to the amount, if any, by which the fair market value of the share of stock underlying the option exceeds the exercise price of such option.settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations. The Company accounted for these options as liability awards. The liability was adjusted at the end of each reporting period to reflect: (1) the net cash payments to option holders made during each period; (2) the impact of the exercise and expiration of options; and (3) the changesmay, in the market price of the Company’s common

stock. Changes in the settlement value of option awards treated under the liability method were reflected as an increasefuture, decide to or a reduction of, expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

At December 31, 2014, there were no options outstanding for which a liability was required as the remaining liability award options were either exercised or settled with a netuse cash payment. At December 31, 2013, the liability for option cancellations was approximately $268,000 based upon the difference in the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2013 of $19.23 per share and the individual exercise prices of the outstanding 17,724 “in-the-money” options that were accounted for as a liability award at that date. The Company recorded a compensation benefit of approximately $137,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and compensation expense of approximately $82,000 and $114,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations related to the respective changes in the amount of the liability for option cancellations.

In each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, a total of 8,862 options were settled with netsettle these cash payments aggregating approximately $132,000, $110,000 and $58,000, respectively.obligations.

For additional information related to stock plans and other incentives, see Note 98 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Changes in Cash Flows

Cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 are summarized as follows:

 

 For the Years Ended December 31, 
             2014                         2013                         2012             

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$14,788,857     $11,441,800     $(6,554,862)    

Cash (used in) investing activities

 (4,203,063)     (4,498,923)     (4,036,929)    

Net cash (used in) financing activities

 (3,400,616)     (1,343,828)     (6,600,161)    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$7,185,178     $5,599,049     $(17,191,952)    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2017   2016   2015 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $16,156,189     $15,802,098     $24,235,648   

Net cash (used in) investing activities

   (9,613,502)     (13,325,189)     (6,187,149)  

Net cash (used in) financing activities

   (8,362,660)     (9,644,279)     (7,135,620)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  $            (1,819,973)     $            (7,167,370)     $            10,912,879   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comparison of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $3,347,000$354,000 from $11,442,000$15,802,000 provided in the 20132016 period to $14,789,000$16,156,000 provided in the 20142017 period. This net increase was primarily the result of an increase inimproved operating cash flow of $2,974,000 fromin the Reis Services segment due2017 period (due to growth in revenue and Reis Services EBITDA.moderating cash expenses).

CashNet cash used in investing activities decreased $296,000$3,712,000 from $4,499,000$13,325,000 used in the 20132016 period to $4,203,000$9,613,000 used in the 20142017 period. This change resulted primarily from a $67,000$3,787,000 decrease in purchases of furniture, fixtures and equipment purchases as(as the 20132016 period included spending in connectionassociated with additionalthe build out of new corporate and operations office space leasedspace) offset by a $75,000 increase in 2013, coupled with a $229,000 decrease of cash used in the 20142017 period as compared to the 20132016 period for website and database development costs for continuing product development and enhancement initiatives.

Net cash used in financing activities was $3,401,000$8,363,000 and $1,344,000$9,644,000 in the 20142017 and 20132016 periods, respectively. In the 2014The 2017 period this amount includes approximately $3,698,000$7,876,000 for dividends declared and paid in the second, third and fourth quartersyear ended December 31, 2017, $3,421,000 used to repurchase shares of 2014 and $132,000 for option cancellation payments,the Company’s common stock, offset by proceeds received from employees for option exercises of $2,935,000. The 2016 period includes approximately $7,747,000 for dividends declared and paid in 2014 aggregating $429,000. In the 2013 period, cashyear ended December 31, 2016, $701,000 used into settle

minimum employee withholding tax obligations on vested RSUs, $206,000 of deferred financing activities was for option cancellation paymentscosts related to the expansion and extension of $110,000the Revolver and restricted$1,144,000 to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock, unit settlements of $1,280,000, offset by proceeds received from employees for option exercises in 2013 of $46,000.$153,000.

Comparison of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $17,997,000decreased $(8,434,000) from $6,555,000 used in the 2012 period to $11,442,000$24,236,000 provided in the 20132015 period to $15,802,000 provided in the 2016 period. This increasedecrease was primarily the result of the one-time use of cash in 2012 for the Gold Peak settlement payments aggregating $17,000,000. In addition, the improvement also included increaseddecreased operating cash flow of $(4,816,000) from the Reis Services segment of $2,533,000 from $13,109,000$23,936,000 provided in the 20122015 period to $15,642,000$19,120,000 provided in the 20132016 period due(due to growthdeclines in revenue, and EBITDA and deferred revenue as described elsewhere herein), as well as the timingimpact of accounts receivable collections. Cash flowsnet cash provided from discontinued operations in future periods will include any additional legal costs in connection with recovery efforts against potentially responsible third parties and/or co-defendantsdue to the collection of $3,724,000 of litigation recoveries in the lawsuit. Although the Company recovered $80,000 and $713,000 in 2013 and 2012, respectively, there is2015 period with no assurance that the Company will be successful in any additional recovery efforts.

2016 equivalent.

CashNet cash used in investing activities increased $462,000$7,138,000 from $4,037,000$6,187,000 used in the 20122015 period to $4,499,000$13,325,000 used in the 20132016 period. This change resulted primarily from ana $4,436,000 increase in spending on leasehold improvements and purchases of furniture, fixtures and equipment in the 2016 period for office space expansion, coupled with a $2,705,000 increase of cash usedinvested primarily in the 2013 period as comparedour databases related to the 2012 period for websiteexpansion of our CRE sales transaction database, the addition of affordable housing as our ninth property type and database development costs for continuing product development and enhancement initiatives, as well as cash used for furniture, fixture and equipment purchases in 2013 for the additional office space we have leased to house our growing employee base.other data expansion efforts.

Net cash used in financing activities decreased $5,256,000 from $6,600,000 usedwas $9,644,000 and $7,136,000 in the 20122016 and 2015 periods, respectively. The 2016 period to $1,344,000 usedincludes approximately $7,747,000 for dividends declared and paid in the 2013 period. Duringyear ended December 31, 2016, $701,000 used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations on vested RSUs, $206,000 of deferred financing costs related to the 2012 period,expansion and extension of the Revolver and $1,144,000 to repurchase shares of the Company’s remaining debtcommon stock, offset by proceeds received from employees for option exercises of $5,691,000 was completely repaid; whereas$153,000. The 2015 period includes approximately $6,338,000 for dividends declared and paid in the 2013 period no debt wasyear ended December 31, 2015, $993,000 used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations on vested RSUs and $89,000 related to costs incurred and no payments were made. Payments for restricted stock unit settlements were approximately $1,390,000 and $909,000in connection with the shelf registration statement filed in the 2013 and 2012 periods, respectively; the increasesecond quarter of $481,000 is due to the higher average price of our common stock in 2013 than in 2012. Proceeds2015, offset by proceeds received from employees for option exercises in 2013 were $46,000, with no such proceeds from exercises in the 2012 period.of $284,000.

Selected SignificantCritical Accounting Policies

Management has identified the following accounting policies which it believes are significantcritical in understanding the Company’s activities, financial position and operating results.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Investments in entities where the Company does not have a controlling interest are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. These investments were initially recorded at cost and were subsequently adjusted for the Company’s proportionate share of the investment’s income (loss) and additional contributions or distributions. All intercompany accounts and transactions among the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation.

Discontinued Operations

In April 2011, the Company determined that all operational and litigation related activities associated with the prior ownership and development of residential real estate, including certain general and administrative costs that supported that segment’s operations, should be presented as a discontinued operation. As a result of this determination and the fact that these operations and cash flows can be clearly distinguished, the operating results of the discontinued segment and related general and administrative costs are aggregated for separate presentation apart from continuing operating results of the Company in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

Intangible Assets, Amortization and Impairment

Website Development Costs

The Company expenses all internet website costs incurred during the preliminary project stage. Thereafter, all direct external and internal development and implementation costs are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over their remaining estimated useful lives, not exceeding three years. The value ascribed to the website intangible asset acquired at the time of the Merger was amortized on a straight-line basis over three years, and during 2010, this ascribed value was fully amortized. Amortization ofexpense for all capitalized website development costs is charged to product development expense.

Database Costs

The Company capitalizes costs for the development of its database in connection with the identification and addition of new real estate properties and sale transactions which provide a future economic benefit. Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over a three or five year period. Costs of updating and maintaining information on existing properties in the database are expensed as incurred. The value ascribed to the database intangible asset acquired at the time of the Merger was amortized on a straight-line basis over three or five years. The ascribed value having a three and five year amortizable life was fully amortized in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Amortization ofexpense for all capitalized database costs is charged to cost of sales.

Customer Relationships

The value ascribed to customer relationships acquired at the time of the Merger is amortized over 15 years on an accelerated basis and is charged to sales and marketing expense.

Lease Value

The value ascribed to the below market terms of the office lease existing at the time of the Merger is amortized over the remaining term of the acquired office lease which was approximately nine years. Amortization is charged to general and administrative expenses.

Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment

Goodwill and a major portion of the other intangible assets were recorded at the time of the Merger. As a result of the tax treatment of the Merger, goodwill and the acquired intangible assets are not deductible for income tax purposes.

Goodwill is not amortized and is tested for impairment at least annually, or after a triggering event has occurred, requiring such a calculation.an assessment. A qualitative assessment can be utilized to determine if a more detailed two step calculation is required.utilized. If the qualitative assessment results in a determination that it is not more likely

than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, then no further evaluation would be necessary. If, after performing the qualitative assessment, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, then the first step of the two step test would be necessary. The first step is a comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill has been assigned with the reporting unit’s carrying value.value is performed. The fair values used in this evaluation would be estimates based upon market projections for the reporting unit. These market projections would utilize a number of estimates and assumptions, such as EBITDA multiples, market comparisons, and quoted market prices. If the fair value of the reporting unit were to exceed its carrying value, goodwill would not be deemed to be impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, a second step wouldan impairment charge will be requiredrecorded based on the difference, with the impairment charge limited to calculate the implied fair valueamount of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value ofallocated to the reporting unit. The Company utilized the qualitative assessment for its 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 evaluations. There was no goodwill impairment identified in 2014, 2013 or 2012.2017, 2016 and 2015.

Intangible assets with determinable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise used. In addition, the carrying amount of amortizable intangible assets are reviewed when indicators of impairment are present. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, the asset would be considered impaired. An impairment charge would be determined by comparing the estimated fair value of the intangible asset to its carrying value, with any shortfall from fair value recognized as an expense in the current period. There was no intangible asset impairment identified in 2014, 2013 or 2012.2017, 2016 and 2015.

Revenue Recognition and Related Items

The Company’s subscription revenue is derived principally from subscriptions to itsweb-based services for itsReis SE product and is recognized as revenue ratably over the related contractual period, which is typically one year but can be as long as 48 months. Revenue fromMobiussReis Portfolio CRE in 2014 and 2013for contracts entered into prior to September 16, 2015, represents the Company’s 50% share of the value of the subscription and is recognized as revenue ratably over the related contractual period consistent with the treatment for theReis SEproduct. RevenuesRevenue from ad-hocReis Portfolio CRE contracts entered into after September 16, 2015 represents the Company’s 100% share of the value of the subscription as a result of the purchase of the intellectual property of theReis Portfolio CRE product and custom reports or projects areis recognized as completed and delivered torevenue ratably over the customers, provided that no significant Company obligations remain. Revenuesrelated contractual period consistent with the treatment for theReis SEproduct. Multiple contracts executed with one customer are accounted for as separate arrangements. Revenue fromReisReports areis recognized monthly as billed for monthly subscribers, or recognized as revenue ratably over the related contractual period for subscriptions in excess of one month.

The Company’s other revenue includes:(1) non-subscription custom data deliverables; and(2) one-time settlements. Revenue fromad-hoc andnon-subscription custom reports or projects is recognized upon completion and delivery to the customers, provided that no significant Company obligations remain. Revenue from settlements for prior unlicensed usage is recognized at the time of the settlement when collectability is reasonably assured.

Deferred revenue represents the portion of a subscription billed or collected in advance under the terms of the respective contract, which will be recognized in future periods. If a customer does not meet the payment obligations of a contract, any related accounts receivable and deferred revenue are written off at that time and the net amount, after considering any recovery of accounts receivable, is charged to cost of sales.

Cost of sales of subscription revenue principally consists of salaries and related expenses for the Company’s researchers who collect, analyze and analyzemaintain the commercial real estate data that is the basis for the Company’s information services. Additionally, cost of sales includes expenses from the amortization of the database intangible asset.

Interest revenue is recorded on an accrual basis.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers(“ASU2014-09”). ASU2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets. Under ASU2014-09, an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method. As such, the Company will recognize the cumulative effect of adopting this guidance as an adjustment to its opening balance of retained earnings, and prior periods will not be retrospectively restated.

The Company has completed its assessment of changes from adopting the new standard, which included a detailed review of contractual terms for all of its significant revenue streams. The Company currently recognizes subscription revenue ratably over the subscription period. Under the updated standard, subscriptions represent a series of performance obligations that are delivered over time, primarily on a stand-ready basis. As a result, the Company’s subscription revenue meets the criteria for revenue recognition over time and will continue to be recognized ratably under ASU2014-09. The cumulative effect of adopting the guidance as it relates to revenue recognition will not result in a material adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption.

Additionally, the Company’s evaluation considered the impact of the new standard on accounting for certain incremental costs associated with obtaining contracts with customers, such as commissions and related payroll taxes. The new standard requires these costs to be capitalized and amortized over the estimated life of the asset. Currently, these costs are expensed as incurred. As a result, the Company will capitalize these costs. The amortization period associated with such costs is approximately four years for the incremental commission costs associated with acquiring a new customer. For commission costs associated with renewal contracts, the amortization period is the contract term.

The Company expects to record, on apre-tax basis, an asset of approximately $3,100,000, a liability of approximately $800,000 and a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of approximately $2,300,000 upon adoption of the new revenue standard as a result of capitalizing commissions.

Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are estimated to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances with respect to deferred income tax assets are recorded when deemed appropriate and adjusted based upon periodic evaluations. In 2013 and 2012, the Company made determinations that reduced the valuation allowance in each of those periods (as discussed elsewhere in this Item 7), which had a significant positive impact on

income from continuing operations and net income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. There was no valuation allowance with respect to deferred income taxes at December 31, 20142017, 2016 and 2013.2015.

The Company evaluates its tax positions in accordance with applicable current accounting literature. Recognition of uncertain tax positions (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more likely than not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being sustained, statutes close or there is a satisfactory resolution of the tax position.

See Note 7 forFor more information regarding income taxes.taxes, see Note 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this filing.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

The Company’s primary market risk exposure has been to changes in interest rates. This risk may be managed by limiting the Company’s financing exposures, to the extent possible, by purchasing interest rate caps when deemed appropriate.

At December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Company’s only potential exposure to interest rates was on variable rate based debt. This exposure has historically been minimized through the use of interest rate caps. Throughout 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Company did not have any interest rate caps. No debt was outstanding at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016. For more information about the Company’s debt, see Note 65 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Reis holds cash and cash equivalents at various regional and national banking institutions. Management monitors the institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents. Management’s emphasis is primarily on safety of principal. Management, in its discretion, has diversified Reis’s cash and cash equivalents among banking institutions to potentially minimize exposure to any one of these entities.entities unless otherwise required to maintain a minimum balance at an institution in connection with its debt covenants. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, we can provide no assurances that access to invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

Cash balances held at banking institutions with which we do business generally exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. While management monitors the cash balances in these bank accounts, such cash balances could be impacted if the underlying banks fail or could be subject to other adverse conditions in the financial markets.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The response to this Item 8 is included as a separate section of this annual report onForm 10-K starting atpage F-1 and is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule13a-15(e) or Rule15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20142017 were designed at a reasonable assurance level and were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2014.2017.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” (2013 Framework). Based upon this assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2014,2017, our internal control over financial reporting is effective in accordance with those criteria.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20142017 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included on pageF-3 herein.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The executive officers and directors of the Company, their ages and their positions are as follows:

 

Name

  

  Age  

  

Positions and Offices Held

M. Christian Mitchell

  6063  Chairman of the Board and Director**

Lloyd Lynford

  5962  Chief Executive Officer, President and Director***

Jonathan Garfield

  5861  Executive Vice President and Director*

Mark P. Cantaluppi

  4447  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

William Sander

  4750  Chief Operating Officer and President, Reis Services

Thomas J. Clarke Jr.

  5861  Director**

Byron C. Vielehr

  5154  Director*
  

*    Term expires during 2015.2018.

**    Term expires during 2016.2019.

***   Term expires during 2017.2020.

To the extent responsive to the requirements of this item, information contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 20152018 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

To the extent responsive to the requirements of this item, information contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 20152018 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

To the extent responsive to the requirements of this item, information contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 20152018 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

To the extent responsive to the requirements of this item, information contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 20152018 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

To the extent responsive to the requirements of this item, information contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 20152018 annual meeting of stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)  (1) Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(a)    (2) Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules have been omitted because the required information for such schedules is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements.

(a)    (3) Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

    3.1 

Articles of Amendment and Restatement filed on May 30, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on FormS-11 (FileNo. 333-32445) filed on July 30, 1997).

    3.2 

Articles Supplementary (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on FormForm 8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on December 21, 2006).

    3.3 

Articles of Amendment (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on FormForm 8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 4, 2007).

    3.4 

Articles Supplementary (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on FormForm 8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 30, 2008).

    3.5 

Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 30, 2008).

    4.1 

The rights of the Company’s equity security holders are defined in Articles V and VI of Exhibit 3.1 above.

    4.2 

Specimen certificate for common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form8-A (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on November 29, 2007).

    4.3 

Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 30, 2007 among Wellsford, Lloyd Lynford and Jonathan Garfield (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Schedule 13D (FileNo. 005-51221) filed by Jonathan Garfield with respect to the Company on June 8, 2007).

  10.1 

Amended and Restated Revolving Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2012,January 28, 2016, by and among Reis Services, LLC, as Borrower, Reis, Inc., as Guarantor, and Capital One, National Association, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on October 18, 2012)February 3, 2016).

  10.2 

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2016, by and among Reis Services, LLC, as Borrower, Reis, Inc., as Guarantor, and Capital One, National Association, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on November 8, 2016).

  10.3

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2016, by and among Reis Services, LLC, as Borrower, Reis, Inc., as Guarantor, and Capital One, National Association, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on December 14, 2016).

  10.4

Trademark Collateral Security Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2012, by and between Reis Services, LLC, as Borrower, and Capital One, National Association, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on October 18, 2012).

  10.310.5 

Pledge Agreement, dated as of October 16, 2012, between Capital One, National Association, as Pledgee, and Reis, Inc., as Pledgor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on FormForm 8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on October 18, 2012).

  10.410.6 

Trademark Assignment of Security, dated as of October 16, 2012, between Reis Services, LLC, as Borrower, and Capital One, National Association, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (FileNo. 1-12917), filed on November 8, 2012).

Exhibit No.

Description

  10.510.7 

Reaffirmation of Collateral Documents, dated as of January 28, 2016, by and among Reis Services, LLC, Reis, Inc., and Capital One, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on February 3, 2016).

  10.8

Amended and Restated Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. 1998 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (FileNo. 1-12917)).*

  10.610.9 

Amendment to Amended and Restated Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. 1998 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to pageF-13 of Annex F to the Company’s proxy statement/prospectus (FileNo. 333-139705) filed on May 2, 2007).*

  10.710.10 

Reis, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s proxy statement filed on April 25, 2008).*

  10.810.11 

Amended and Restated Reis, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s proxy statement (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on April 28, 2011).*

10.9  10.12

Reis, Inc. 20132016 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s proxy statement on Schedule 14A (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on April 24, 2013)27, 2016).*

10.10  10.13

Employment Agreement effective July 1, 2013,2016, among Reis, Inc., Reis Services, LLC and Lloyd Lynford (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 17, 2013)21, 2016).*

10.11  10.14

Indemnification Agreement effective July 1, 2013,2016, among Reis, Inc., Reis Services, LLC and Lloyd Lynford (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 17, 2013)21, 2016).*

10.12  10.15

Employment Agreement effective July 1, 2013,2016, among Reis, Inc., Reis Services, LLC and Jonathan Garfield (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 17, 2013)21, 2016).*

10.13  10.16

Indemnification Agreement effective July 1, 2013,2016, among Reis, Inc., Reis Services, LLC and Jonathan Garfield (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 17, 2013)21, 2016). *

10.14  10.17

Employment Agreement effective July 1, 2013,2016, between Reis Services, LLC and William Sander (with Reis, Inc. a party thereto for limited purposes) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 17, 2013)21, 2016).*

10.15  10.18

Employment Agreement effective July 1, 2013,2016, among Reis, Inc., Reis Services, LLC and Mark P. Cantaluppi (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K (FileNo. 1-12917) filed on June 17, 2013)21, 2016).*

10.16  10.19

Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement Under Amended and Restated Reis, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (FileNo. 1-12917), filed on August 4, 2011 (FileNo. 1-12917)).*

10.17  10.20

Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement Under Amended and Restated Reis, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (FileNo. 1-12917)).*

14.1  21.1

Reis, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Senior Financial Officers, Other Officers and All Other Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 1-12917)).

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

31.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section  302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section  302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101

Interactive Data Files, formatted in extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL).

*

This document is either a management contract or compensatory plan.

 

 (b)

Those exhibits listed in Item 15(a)(3) above and not indicated as “incorporated by reference” are filed as exhibits to this Form10-K.

 

 (c)

Not applicable.

Item 16. Form10-K Summary.

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

REIS, INC.
By: /s/ Mark P. Cantaluppi
 Mark P. Cantaluppi
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 5, 20158, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Name

  

Title

 

                    Date                     

/s/  Lloyd Lynford

Lloyd Lynford

  

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 March 5, 2015
Lloyd Lynford(Principal Executive Officer)8, 2018

/s/  Mark P. Cantaluppi

Mark P. Cantaluppi

  

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

March 5, 2015
Mark P. Cantaluppi

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 March 8, 2018

/s/  M. Christian Mitchell

M. Christian Mitchell

  Chairman of the Board and Director March 5, 2015
M. Christian Mitchell8, 2018

/s/  Thomas J. Clarke Jr.

Thomas J. Clarke Jr.

  Director March 5, 2015
Thomas J. Clarke Jr.8, 2018

/s/  Jonathan Garfield

Jonathan Garfield

  Director March 5, 2015
Jonathan Garfield8, 2018

/s/  Byron C. Vielehr

Byron C. Vielehr

  Director March 5, 2015
Byron C. Vielehr8, 2018

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 F-2 

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016

 F-4 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December  31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015

 F-5 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015

 F-6 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December  31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015

 F-7 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 F-8 

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

All schedules have been omitted because the required information for such schedules is not present, is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Reis, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Reis, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013, and2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)statements”). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014,2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework)framework) and our report dated March 5, 20158, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1990

Chicago, Illinois

March 5, 20158, 2018

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Reis, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Reis, Inc.’s and Subsidiaries’Subsidiaries (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework)framework) (the “COSO Criteria”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria). Criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and our report dated March8, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Assessment ofReport on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, and our report dated March 5, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 5, 20158, 2018

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

December 31,   December 31, 
2014 2013  2017 2016 

ASSETS

   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

 $17,745,077     $10,559,899      $19,670,613     $21,490,586     

Restricted cash and investments

 212,625     216,702    

Accounts receivable, net

 12,627,063     11,386,584       9,744,513      10,743,505     

Prepaid and other assets

 4,164,320     2,787,909       681,039      792,991     

Assets attributable to discontinued operations

 3,500     8,500    
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

 34,752,585     24,959,594       30,096,165      33,027,082     

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,158,647 and $1,905,933, respectively

 850,866     853,377    

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $33,589,746 and $28,764,189, respectively

 14,681,410     15,687,117    

Deferred tax asset, non-current portion, net

 18,638,737     21,316,520    

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,891,684 and $1,082,793, respectively

   4,919,230      5,260,443     

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $48,892,725 and $41,861,561, respectively

   19,474,411      17,922,282     

Deferred tax asset, net

   12,072,118      16,814,737     

Goodwill

 54,824,648     54,824,648       54,824,648      54,824,648     

Other assets

 139,797     225,528       217,161      295,349     
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total assets

 $123,888,043     $117,866,784      $      121,603,733     $      128,144,541    
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

Current liabilities:

   

Current portion of debt

 $—     $—      $—      $—     

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 4,170,687     3,578,227       4,149,363      4,031,444     

Liability for option cancellations

 —     268,341    

Deferred revenue

 22,885,287     20,284,178       26,533,983      25,031,100     

Liabilities attributable to discontinued operations

 299,025     342,138    
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

 27,354,999     24,472,884       30,683,346      29,062,544     

Other long-term liabilities

 419,638     522,941       2,447,037      1,902,081     
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

 27,774,637     24,995,825       33,130,383      30,964,625     
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

   

Stockholders’ equity:

   

Common stock, $0.02 par value per share, 101,000,000 shares authorized, 11,156,571 and 10,916,441 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 223,131     218,328    

Common stock, $0.02 par value per share, 101,000,000 shares authorized, 11,470,565 and 11,272,150 issued and outstanding, respectively

   229,411      225,443     

Additional paid in capital

 105,605,803     102,717,693       109,361,540      107,668,599     

Retained earnings (deficit)

 (9,715,528)    (10,065,062)      (21,117,601)    (10,714,126)   
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 96,113,406     92,870,959       88,473,350      97,179,916     
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 $      123,888,043     $      117,866,784      $121,603,733     $128,144,541    
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

For the Years Ended December 31,  For the Years Ended December 31, 
2014 2013 2012  2017 2016 2015 

Revenue:

   

Subscription revenue

 $46,801,357   $45,398,701   $43,722,087  

Other revenue

 1,388,330   2,131,054   7,168,351  
 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Subscription revenue

 $      41,335,155     $      34,721,088     $      31,228,644    

Cost of sales of subscription revenue

 8,037,019     6,973,772     6,616,931    

Total revenue

 48,189,687   47,529,755   50,890,438  

Cost of sales

 12,565,299   10,999,146   9,081,624  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

 33,298,136     27,747,316     24,611,713     35,624,388   36,530,609   41,808,814  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses:

   

Sales and marketing

 10,235,349     8,349,544     7,643,303     12,626,490   11,878,590   11,700,840  

Product development

 3,472,875     3,121,729     2,485,168     4,696,207   4,167,474   3,711,054  

General and administrative expenses

 12,040,343     11,909,462     11,793,441     15,742,567   15,664,495   14,267,027  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

 25,748,567     23,380,735     21,921,912             33,065,264           31,710,559           29,678,921  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other income (expenses):

   

Interest and other income

 22,016     9,981     51,972     3,141   21,937   37,857  

Interest expense

 (113,200)    (113,200)    (155,443)    (129,628)  (108,345)  (91,767) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other income (expenses)

 (91,184)    (103,219)    (103,471)    (126,487)  (86,408)  (53,910) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income taxes and discontinued operations

 7,458,385     4,263,362     2,586,330     2,432,637   4,733,642   12,075,983  

Income tax expense (benefit)

 2,842,000     (13,670,069)    (5,427,000)   

Income tax expense

 5,591,000   1,953,000   4,005,000  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 4,616,385     17,933,431     8,013,330    

(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit of $(382,000), $(230,000) and $—, respectively

 (569,263)    (336,489)    (12,296,912)   

(Loss) income from continuing operations

 (3,158,363)  2,780,642   8,070,983  

Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense of $—, $— and $1,409,000, respectively

  —    —   2,234,000  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $4,047,122     $17,596,942     $(4,283,582)   

Net (loss) income

 $(3,158,363)  $2,780,642   $10,304,983  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Per share amounts – basic:

   

Income from continuing operations

 $0.42     $1.65     $0.75    

(Loss) income from continuing operations

 $(0.28)  $0.25   $0.72  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $0.37     $1.62     $(0.40)   

Net (loss) income

 $(0.28)  $0.25   $0.92  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Per share amounts – diluted:

   

Income from continuing operations

 $0.39     $1.57     $0.73    

(Loss) income from continuing operations

 $(0.28)  $0.24   $0.69  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $0.34     $1.54     $(0.39)   

Net (loss) income

 $(0.28)  $0.24   $0.88  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

   

Basic

 11,086,690     10,884,533     10,685,333     11,482,343   11,305,110   11,226,932  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

 11,593,079     11,396,559     11,034,082     11,482,343   11,745,516   11,706,495  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Dividends declared per common share

 $0.33     $—     $—     $0.68   $0.68   $0.56  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 AND 20122015

 

      Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 Total
Stockholders’
Equity
     Retained Total 
Common Shares Paid in
Capital
   Common Shares Paid in Earnings Stockholders’ 
Shares Amount    Shares Amount Capital (Deficit) Equity 

Balance, January 1, 2012

 10,570,891     $211,417     $100,677,336     $(23,378,422)    $77,510,331    

Shares issued for vested employees restricted stock units

 133,518     2,671     (2,671)    —     —    

Shares issued for settlement of vested director restricted stock units

 72,410     1,448     (1,448)    —     —    

Shares issued for option exercises

 5,824     116     (116)    —     —    

Stock based compensation, net

 —     —     1,329,871     —     1,329,871    

Net (loss)

 —     —     —     (4,283,582)    (4,283,582)   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 10,782,643     215,652     102,002,972     (27,662,004)    74,556,620    

Balance, January 1, 2015

   11,156,571   $223,131   $105,605,803   $(9,715,528)  $96,113,406   

Shares issued for vested employee restricted stock units

 124,936     2,499     (2,499)    —     —       64,834   1,297   (1,297)   —    —   

Shares issued for option exercises

 8,862     177     46,260     —     46,437       35,000   700   283,550    —   284,250   

Stock based compensation, net

 —     —     670,960     —     670,960       —    —   1,303,708    —   1,303,708   

Registration statement costs

   —    —   (89,331)   —   (89,331)  

Dividends

   —    —    —   (6,337,568)  (6,337,568)  

Net income

 —     —     —     17,596,942     17,596,942       —    —    —   10,304,983   10,304,983   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 10,916,441     218,328     102,717,693     (10,065,062)    92,870,959    

Balance, December 31, 2015

   11,256,405   225,128   107,102,433   (5,748,113)  101,579,448   

Shares issued for vested employees restricted stock units

 144,660     2,894     (2,894)    —     —    

Shares issued for settlement of vested director restricted stock units

 40,564     811     (811)    —     —    

Shares issued for vested employee restricted stock units

   52,421   1,048   (1,048)   —    —   

Shares issued for option exercises

 54,906     1,098     427,652     —     428,750       17,500   350   152,650    —   153,000   

Stock based compensation, net

 —     —     2,464,163     —     2,464,163       —    —   1,557,394    —   1,557,394   

Dividends

 —     —     —     (3,697,588)    (3,697,588)      —    —    —   (7,746,655)  (7,746,655)  

Stock repurchases

   (54,176)  (1,083)  (1,142,830)   —   (1,143,913)  

Net income

 —     —     —         4,047,122     4,047,122       —    —    —   2,780,642   2,780,642   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

     11,156,571     $      223,131     $    105,605,803     $(9,715,528)    $    96,113,406    

Balance, December 31, 2016

   11,272,150   225,443   107,668,599   (10,714,126)  97,179,916   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Cumulative effect change in accounting principle (as described in Note 2)

   —    —   (27,830)  631,211   603,381   
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance, January 1, 2017

   11,272,150   225,443   107,640,769   (10,082,915)  97,783,297   

Shares issued for vested employee restricted stock units

   95,443   1,909   (1,909)   —    —   

Shares issued for option exercises

   285,000   5,700   2,929,300    —   2,935,000   

Stock based compensation, net

   —    —   2,211,076    —   2,211,076   

Dividends

   —    —    —   (7,876,323)  (7,876,323)  

Stock repurchases

   (182,028)  (3,641)  (3,417,696)   —   (3,421,337)  

Net (loss)

   —    —    —   (3,158,363)  (3,158,363)  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

       11,470,565   $          229,411   $109,361,540   $(21,117,601)  $88,473,350   
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

For the Years Ended December 31,   For the Years Ended December 31, 
2014 2013 2012   2017 2016 2015 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income (loss)

 $4,047,122     $17,596,942     $(4,283,582)   

Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

Deferred tax provision (benefit)

 2,113,783     (13,900,069)    (5,427,000)   

CASHFLOWSFROMOPERATINGACTIVITIES:

    

Net (loss) income

  $    (3,158,363)  $    2,780,642    $    10,304,983   

Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Deferred tax provision

   5,346,000    1,766,000    4,449,000   

Depreciation

 382,829     332,576     354,953       1,025,092    706,906    429,498   

Amortization of intangible assets

 4,828,452     4,696,939     4,629,394       7,031,164    5,923,269    5,148,546   

Stock based compensation charges

 1,702,163     1,859,336     2,181,135       2,211,076    2,098,553    1,772,679   

Changes in assets and liabilities:

    

Restricted cash and investments

 4,077     (577)    (720)      —    212,268    357   

Accounts receivable, net

 (1,240,479)    (692,383)    (2,096,737)      998,992    2,997,664    (1,114,106)  

Prepaid and other assets

 40,320     95,149     2,755,777       190,140    (40,721)   (332,450)  

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 446,044     (681,666)    (7,305,528)      1,009,205    (382,084)   1,170,929   

Liability for option cancellations

 (136,563)    81,707     113,965    

Deferred revenue

 2,601,109     2,053,846     2,523,481       1,502,883    (260,399)   2,406,212   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 14,788,857     11,441,800     (6,554,862)   

Net cash provided by operating activities

   16,156,189    15,802,098    24,235,648   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Website and database development costs

 (3,822,745)    (4,051,460)    (3,806,795)   

CASHFLOWSFROMINVESTINGACTIVITIES:

    

Website and database development additions

   (8,583,293)   (8,508,597)   (5,804,090)  

Furniture, fixtures and equipment additions

 (380,318)    (447,463)    (230,134)      (1,030,209)   (4,818,683)   (383,059)  

Proceeds from sale of furniture, fixtures and equipment

   —    2,091     —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash (used in) investing activities

 (4,203,063)    (4,498,923)    (4,036,929)   

Net cash (used in) investing activities

   (9,613,502)   (13,325,189)   (6,187,149)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Repayment of debt

 —     —     (5,690,940)   

CASHFLOWSFROMFINANCINGACTIVITIES:

    

Dividends

 (3,697,588)    —     —       (7,876,323)   (7,746,655)   (6,337,568)  

Registration statement costs

   —     —    (89,331)  

Proceeds from option exercises

   2,935,000    153,000    284,250   

Payments for option cancellations and restricted stock units

 (131,778)    (1,390,265)    (909,221)      —    (701,159)   (992,971)  

Proceeds from option exercises

 428,750     46,437     —    

Payment of financing cost

   —    (205,552)    —   

Stock repurchases

   (3,421,337)   (1,143,913)    —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash (used in) financing activities

 (3,400,616)    (1,343,828)    (6,600,161)      (8,362,660)   (9,644,279)   (7,135,620)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 7,185,178     5,599,049     (17,191,952)   

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (1,819,973)   (7,167,370)   10,912,879   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 10,559,899     4,960,850     22,152,802       21,490,586    28,657,956    17,745,077   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 $      17,745,077     $      10,559,899     $        4,960,850      $19,670,613    $21,490,586    $28,657,956   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

SUPPLEMENTALINFORMATION:

    

Cash paid during the year for interest

 $25,347     $24,236     $42,008      $50,694    $42,500    $25,347   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash paid during the year for income taxes, net of refunds

 $229,982     $723,228     $77,856    

Cash paid during the year for income taxes

  $274,719    $722,105    $651,502   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

SUPPLEMENTALSCHEDULEOFNON-CASHINVESTINGANDFINANCINGACTIVITIES:

    

Accrual for furniture, fixtures and equipment additions

  $(346,330)   $346,330    
  

 

  

 

  

Disposal of fully depreciated furniture, fixtures and equipment

 $130,115     $254,842     $82,776      $216,201    $2,074,098    $138,160   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Disposal of fully depreciated website costs

 $2,895    

Accrual for website and database development costs

    $350,000   
  

 

         

 

 

Shares issued for vested employee restricted stock units

 $2,894     $2,499     $2,671      $1,909    $1,048    $1,297   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Shares issued for settlement of vested director restricted stock units

 $811     $1,448    

Shares issued for option exercises

  $5,700     
  

 

     

 

   

 

   

Exercise of stock options through the receipt of tendered shares

 $36,246     $39,524    
  

 

     

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.

1.     Organization and Business

Reis, Inc. is a Maryland corporation. When we refer to “Reis” or the “Company,” we are referring to Reis, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (“Reis” or the “Company”)subsidiaries. The Company provides commercial real estate market information and analytical tools to real estate professionals, through its Reis Services subsidiary. For disclosure and financial reporting purposes, this business is referred to as the Reis Services segment.

Reis ServicesServices.

Reis Services, including its predecessors, was founded in 1980.

Reis Services

The Company provides commercial real estate (“CRE”) market information and analytical tools to real estate professionals. Reis maintains a proprietary database containing detailedof information on all commercial properties in metropolitan markets and neighborhoods throughout the U.S. The database containsThis information on apartment, office, retail, warehouse/distribution, flex/research & development, self storage and seniors housing properties, and is used by real estateCRE investors, lenders and other professionals to make informed buying, selling and financing decisions. In addition, Reis data is used by debt and equity investors to assess, quantify and manage the risks of default and loss associated with individual mortgages, properties, portfolios and real estate backed securities. Reis currently provides its information services to many of the nation’s leading lending institutions, equity investors, brokers and appraisers.

The Company’s product portfolio features:featuresReis SE, its flagship delivery platform aimed at larger andmid-sized enterprises; enterprises. Other products include:ReisReports, aimed at prosumers and smaller enterprises; andMobiussReis Portfolio CREor Mobiuss,and other portfolio support products and services,aimed primarily at risk managers and credit administrators at banks andnon-bank lending institutions.institutions; andReisReports, aimed at prosumers and smaller enterprises. It is through these products that Reisprovides online access to a proprietary database of commercial real estate information and analytical tools designed to facilitate debt and equity transactions as well as ongoing asset and portfolio evaluations.

Depending on the product or level of entitlement, users have access to market trends and forecasts at metropolitan and neighborhood levels throughout the U.S. and/or detailed building-specific information such as rents, vacancy rates, lease terms, property sales, new construction listings, property valuation estimates and property valuation estimates.level tax information. Reis’s products are designed to meet the demand for timely and accurate information to support the decision making of property owners, developers, builders, banks andnon-bank lenders, equity investors and service providers. These real estate professionals require access to timely information on both the performance and pricing of assets, including detailed data on market transactions, supply, absorption, rents and sale prices. This information is critical to all aspects of valuing assets and financing their acquisition, development and construction.

Discontinued Operations – Residential Development Activities

Prior to May 2007, the name of the Company was Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. (“Wellsford”). Wellsford, which was originally formed on January 8, 1997, acquired the Reis Services business by merger in May 2007 (the “Merger”). Wellsford’s primary operating activities immediately prior to the Merger, and conducted through its subsidiaries, were the development, construction and sale of three residential projects and its approximate 23% ownership interest in the Reis Services business. The Company completed the sale of the remaining residential units and homes at its projects or divested of the remaining residential projects in bulk sales by April 2011. In 2012, the Company settled construction defect litigation at its Colorado project.

See Note 3 and Note 10 for additional information regarding the Company’s segments and the aforementioned litigation.

2.

2.    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Investments in entities where the Company does not have a controlling interest are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. These investments were initially recorded at cost and were subsequently adjusted for the Company’s proportionate share of the investment’s income (loss) and additional contributions or distributions. All inter-company accounts and transactions among the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance related to the Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). This guidance identifies the sources of accepted accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). The Codification superseded all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards upon the effective date. The adoption of this standard changed how the Company references various elements of GAAP when preparing its financial statement disclosures, but has had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Discontinued Operations

In April 2011, the Company determined that all operational and litigation related activities associated with the prior ownership and development of residential real estate, including certain general and administrative costs that supported that segment’sthe related operations, should be presented as a discontinued operation. As a result of this determination and the fact that these operations and cash flows can be

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

were clearly distinguished, the operating results of the discontinued segment and related general and administrative costs arewere aggregated for separate presentation apart from continuing operating results of the Company in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. Discontinued operations were completed as of December 31, 2015, therefore there were no discontinued operations activities during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Variable Interests

The Company evaluates its investments and subsidiaries to determine if an entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company performs this analysis on an ongoing basis, or as circumstances change. The Company doesdid not have any VIEs in the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012.2015.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all demand and money market accounts and short term investments in government funds with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash and cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivablesreceivable are recorded at invoiced amounts and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects the Company’s assessment of collectability of outstanding receivables after consideration of the age of a receivable, customer payment history and other current events or economic factors that could affect a customer’s ability to make payments.

Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment

The Company capitalizes costs for the purchase of furniture, fixtures and equipment that have an expected useful life beyond one year. Depreciation expense is calculated on a straight-line basis over the determined useful life of the asset, generally between three toand ten years. Depreciation expense wasis charged to general and administrative expenses and aggregated approximately $383,000, $333,000$1,025,000, $707,000 and $355,000$429,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

Intangible Assets, Amortization and Impairment

Website Development Costs

The Company expenses all internet website costs incurred during the preliminary project stage. Thereafter, all direct external and internal development and implementation costs are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over their remaining estimated useful lives, not exceeding three years. The value ascribed to the website intangible asset acquired at the time of the Merger was amortized on a straight-line basis over three years, and during 2010, this ascribed value was fully amortized. Amortization ofexpense for all capitalized website development costs is charged to product development expense.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Database Costs

The Company capitalizes costs for the development of its database in connection with the identification and addition of new real estate properties and sale transactions which provide a future economic benefit. Amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over a three or five year period. Costs of updating and maintaining information on existing properties in the database are expensed as incurred. The value ascribed to the database intangible asset acquired at the time of the Merger was amortized on a straight-line basis over three or five years. The ascribed value having a three and five year amortizable life was fully amortized in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Amortization ofexpense for all capitalized database costs is charged to cost of sales.

Customer Relationships

The value ascribed to customer relationships acquired at the time of the MergerMay 2007 merger (the “Merger”) is amortized over 15 years on an accelerated basis and is charged to sales and marketing expense.

Lease Value

The value ascribed to the below market terms of the office lease existing at the time of the Merger iswas amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the acquired office lease whichlease. During 2016 this ascribed value was approximately nine years.fully amortized. Amortization isexpense was charged to general and administrative expenses.expenses during 2016 and 2015.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment

Goodwill and a major portion of the other intangible assets were recorded at the time of the Merger. As a result of the tax treatment of the Merger, goodwill and the acquired intangible assets are not deductible for income tax purposes.

Goodwill is not amortized and is tested for impairment at least annually, or after a triggering event has occurred, requiring such a calculation.an assessment. A qualitative assessment can be utilized to determine if a more detailed two step calculation is required.utilized. If the qualitative assessment results in a determination that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, then no further evaluation would be necessary. If, after performing the qualitative assessment, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill, then the first step of the two step test would be necessary. The first step is a comparison of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill has been assigned with the reporting unit’s carrying value.value is performed. The fair values used in this evaluation would be estimates based upon market projections for the reporting unit. These market projections would utilize a number of estimates and assumptions, such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiples, market comparisons, and quoted market prices. If the fair value of the reporting unit were to exceed its carrying value, goodwill would not be deemed to be impaired. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, a second step wouldan impairment charge will be requiredrecorded based on the difference, with the impairment charge limited to calculate the implied fair valueamount of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value ofallocated to the reporting unit. The Company utilized the qualitative assessment for its 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 evaluations. There was no goodwill impairment identified in 2014, 2013 or 2012.2017, 2016 and 2015.

Intangible assets with determinable useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise used. In addition, the carrying amount of amortizable intangible assets are reviewed when indicators of impairment are present. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, the asset would be considered impaired. An impairment charge would be determined by comparing the estimated fair value of the intangible asset to its carrying value, with any shortfall from fair value recognized as an expense in the current period. There was no intangible asset impairment identified in 2014, 2013 or 2012.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

2017, 2016 and 2015.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs consist of costs incurred to obtain financing or financing commitments.commitments and are included in prepaid and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Such costs are amortized by the Company over the expected term of the respective agreements.

Fair Value Measurements

The current accounting literature provides for a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and

Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016 and 2012,2015, the Company had no assets or liabilities valued using the valuation hierarchy.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Revenue Recognition and Related Items

The Company’s subscription revenue is derived principally from subscriptions to itsweb-based services for itsReis SE product and is recognized as revenue ratably over the related contractual period, which is typically one year but can be as long as 48 months. Revenue fromMobiussReis Portfolio CRE in 2014 and 2013for contracts entered into prior to September 16, 2015 represents the Company’s 50% share of the value of the subscription and is recognized as revenue ratably over the related contractual period consistent with the treatment for theReis SEproduct. RevenuesRevenue from ad-hocReis Portfolio CRE contracts entered into after September 16, 2015 represents the Company’s 100% share of the value of the subscription as a result of the purchase of the intellectual property of theReis Portfolio CRE product and custom reports or projects areis recognized as completed and delivered torevenue ratably over the customers, provided that no significant Company obligations remain. Revenuesrelated contractual period consistent with the treatment for theReis SEproduct. Multiple contracts executed with one customer are accounted for as separate arrangements. Revenue fromReisReports areis recognized monthly as billed for monthly subscribers, or recognized as revenue ratably over the related contractual period for subscriptions in excess of one month.

The Company’s other revenue includes;(1) non-subscription custom data deliverables; and(2) one-time settlements. Revenue fromad-hoc andnon-subscription custom reports or projects is recognized upon completion and delivery to the customers, provided that no significant Company obligations remain. Revenue from settlements for prior unlicensed usage is recognized at the time of the settlement when collectability is reasonably assured.

Deferred revenue represents the portion of a subscription billed or collected in advance under the terms of the respective contract, which will be recognized in future periods. If a customer does not meet the payment obligations of a contract, any related accounts receivable and deferred revenue are written off at that time and the net amount, after considering any recovery of accounts receivable, is charged to cost of sales.

Cost of sales of subscription revenue principally consists of salaries and related expenses for the Company’s researchers who collect, analyze and analyzemaintain the commercial real estate data that is the basis for the Company’s information services. Additionally, cost of sales includes expenses from the amortization of the database intangible asset.

Interest revenue is recorded on an accrual basis.

Share Based Compensation

Equity Awards

The fair market value as of the grant date of awards of stock, restricted stock units or certain stock options is recognized as compensation expense by the Company over the respective vesting periods.

Liability Awards

The Company accrued a liability for cash payments that could be made to option holders for the amount of the market value of the Company’s common stock in excess of the exercise prices of outstanding options accounted for as a liability award. This liability was adjusted at the end of each reporting period to reflect: (1) the net cash payments to option holders made during each period; (2) the impact of the exercise and expiration of options; and (3) the changes in the market price of the Company’s common stock.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Changes in the settlement value of option awards treated under the liability method were reflected as an increase to, or a reduction of, expense in the consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2014, there were no options outstanding for which a liability was required as the remaining liability award options were either exercised or settled with a net cash payment. At December 31, 2013, of the 627,724 outstanding options, 17,724 options were accounted for as a liability award as these awards allowed for settlement in cash or in stock at the election of the option holder. The liability for option cancellations was approximately $268,000 at December 31, 2013; there was no liability for option cancellations at December 31, 2014.

See Note 98 for activity with respect to stock options and restricted stock units.

Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are estimated to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances with respect to deferred income tax assets are recorded when deemed appropriate and adjusted based upon periodic evaluations.

The Company evaluates its tax positions in accordance with applicable current accounting literature. Recognition of uncertain tax positions (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludes that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more likely than not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a company subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being sustained, statutes close or there is a satisfactory resolution of the tax position.

See Note 76 for more information regarding income taxes.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

 

Per Share Data

Basic earnings per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is based upon the increased number of common shares that would be outstanding assuming the exercise of dilutive common share options and the consideration of restricted stock awards. The following table details the computation of earnings per common share, basic and diluted:

 

 For the Years Ended December 31, 
 2014 2013 2012 

Numerator for basic per share calculation:

Income from continuing operations for basic calculation

$4,616,385       $17,933,431       $8,013,330       

(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax (benefit)

 (569,263)       (336,489)       (12,296,912)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) for basic calculation

$    4,047,122       $    17,596,942       $    (4,283,582)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

��  

 

 

 

Numerator for diluted per share calculation:

Income from continuing operations

$4,616,385       $17,933,431       $8,013,330       

Adjustments to income from continuing operations for the statement of operations impact of dilutive securities

 (136,563)       —        —       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations for dilution calculation

 4,479,822        17,933,431        8,013,330       

(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax (benefit)

 (569,263)       (336,489)       (12,296,912)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) for dilution calculation

$3,910,559       $17,596,942       $(4,283,582)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator:

Weighted average common shares – basic

 11,086,690        10,884,533        10,685,333       

Effect of dilutive securities:

RSUs

 169,813        242,396        305,033       

Stock options

 336,576        269,630        43,716       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares – diluted

 11,593,079        11,396,559        11,034,082       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Per common share amounts – basic:

Income from continuing operations

$0.42       $1.65       $0.75       

(Loss) from discontinued operations

 (0.05)       (0.03)       (1.15)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$0.37       $1.62       $(0.40)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Per common share amounts – diluted:

Income from continuing operations

$0.39       $1.57       $0.73       

(Loss) from discontinued operations

 (0.05)       (0.03)       (1.12)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$0.34       $1.54       $(0.39)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2017  2016  2015 

Numerator for basic per share calculation:

    

(Loss) income from continuing operations for basic calculation

   $(3,158,363)     $2,780,642     $8,070,983   

Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

   —      —     2,234,000   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for basic calculation

   $(3,158,363)     $2,780,642     $        10,304,983   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Numerator for diluted per share calculation:

    

(Loss) income from continuing operations

   $(3,158,363)    $2,780,642     $8,070,983   

Adjustments to (loss) income from continuing operations for the statements of operations impact of dilutive securities

   —      —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations for dilution calculation

   (3,158,363)     2,780,642     8,070,983   

Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

   —      —     2,234,000   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income for dilution calculation

   $        (3,158,363)     $        2,780,642     $10,304,983   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Denominator:

    

Weighted average common shares – basic

   11,482,343      11,305,110     11,226,932   

Effect of dilutive securities:

    

RSUs

   —      138,077     142,949   

Stock options

   —      302,329     336,614   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares – diluted

   11,482,343      11,745,516     11,706,495   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per common share amounts – basic:

    

(Loss) income from continuing operations

   $(0.28)     $0.25     $0.72   

Income from discontinued operations

   —      —     0.20   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

   $(0.28)     $0.25     $0.92   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per common share amounts – diluted:

    

(Loss) income from continuing operations

   $(0.28)     $0.24     $0.69   

Income from discontinued operations

   —      —     0.19   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

   $(0.28)     $0.24     $0.88   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Potentially dilutive securities include all stock based awards. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2014,2017, 2016 and 2015, certain equity awards were antidilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the option awards accounted for under the liability method were antidilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2012, certain equity awards and the option awards accounted for under the liability method were antidilutive.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

From time to time, the Company has been, is or may in the future be a defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. The Company records a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The outcome of any litigation is uncertain; it is possible that a judgment in any legal actions to which the Company is a party, or which are proposed or threatened, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements. See Note 10.9.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

New Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-11,Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists(“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-11 changes the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. These changes require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit as a liability in the financial statements if (i) a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position, or (ii) the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position. Otherwise, an unrecognized tax benefit is required to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. The Company adopted the provisions of this update as of January 1, 2014 and incorporated the provisions of this update into its consolidated financial statements upon adoption. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08,Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08”). ASU 2014-08 changes the definition of a discontinued operation to include only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. ASU 2014-08 is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014 and is available for early adoption as of January 1, 2014. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2014-08 as of January 1, 2014 and incorporated the provisions of this update into its consolidated financial statements upon adoption. The adoption of ASU 2014-08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers(“ASU2014-09”). ASU2014-09 affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets. Under ASU2014-09, an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method. As such, the Company will recognize the cumulative effect of adopting this guidance as an adjustment to its opening balance of retained earnings, and prior periods will not be retrospectively restated.

The Company has completed its assessment of changes from adopting the new standard, which included a detailed review of contractual terms for all of its significant revenue streams. The Company currently recognizes subscription revenue ratably over the subscription period. Under the updated standard, subscriptions represent a series of performance obligations that are delivered over time, primarily on a stand-ready basis. As a result, the Company’s subscription revenue meets the criteria for revenue recognition over time and will continue to be recognized ratably under ASU 2014-092014-09. The cumulative effect of adopting the guidance as it relates to revenue recognition will not result in a material adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption.

Additionally, the Company’s evaluation considered the impact of the new standard on accounting for certain incremental costs associated with obtaining contracts with customers, such as commissions and related payroll taxes. The new standard requires these costs to be capitalized and amortized over the estimated life of the asset. Currently, these costs are expensed as incurred. The amortization period associated with such costs is approximately four years for the incremental commission costs associated with acquiring a new customer. For commission costs associated with renewal contracts, the amortization period is the contract term.

The Company expects to record, on apre-tax basis, an asset of approximately $3,100,000, a liability of approximately $800,000 and a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of approximately $2,300,000 upon adoption of the new revenue standard as a result of capitalizing commissions.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02,Leases(“ASU2016-02”). ASU2016-02 establishes aright-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. ASU2016-02 is effective for annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016.2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the pending adoption of ASU 2014-092016-02 will have on the Company’sits consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In August 2014,March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2014-152016-09,, DisclosureCompensation-Stock Compensation (“ASU2016-09”). Under ASU2016-09, entities will be required to recognize the income tax effects of Uncertainties aboutawards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. The guidance on employers’ accounting for (1) an Entity’s Abilityemployee’s use of shares to Continue as a Going Concern(“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 defines management’s responsibility to evaluate whether theresatisfy the employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation and (2) forfeitures is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.also changing. For public business entities, ASU 2014-15 is2016-09 was effective for annual periods endingfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016.those years. The Company expects thatadopted ASU2016-09 as of January 1, 2017, which included (1) recording an additional deferred tax asset on the consolidated balance sheet of approximately $603,000 and (2) the recording of a cumulative effect change in stockholders’ equity related to the prior treatment of estimated forfeitures of $28,000 as the Company has elected to record forfeitures in the period in which they occur. The cumulative effect change in accounting principle is reflected on the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity to reconcile from the previously reported December 31, 2016 balances to the recast amounts after giving effect to ASU2016-09. Other than the items identified, the adoption of ASU 2014-15 will2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

3.

Segment Information

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-01,Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU2017-01”). ASU2017-01 provides criteria to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities (a “set”) is not a business and narrows the definition of the term output so that it is consistent with the description of outputs in Topic 606. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is only permitted for transactions that have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU2017-01 to have a material impact to its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-04,Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU2017-04”). ASU2017-04 removes Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under ASU2017-04, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge will be recorded based on the difference, with the impairment charge limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. ASU2017-04is organized into separately managed segmentseffective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted on or after January 1, 2017. The Company early adopted ASU2017-04 during the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and performed the annual goodwill impairment analysis as follows:of October 1, 2017 in accordance with the Reis Services segment,new pronouncement. The adoption of ASU2017-04 did not have a material impact on the discontinued operations segmentCompany’s consolidated financial statements and other. The following tables present condensed balance sheet and operating data for these segments:disclosures.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

 

3.    Segment Information (continued)

The Company is organized into separately managed segments as follows: the Reis Services segment and the Other segment. The following tables present condensed balance sheet and operating data for these segments:

(amounts in thousands)                

Condensed Balance Sheet Data

December 31, 2014

  Reis
    Services    
   Discontinued
    Operations (A)    
       Other (B)           Consolidated     

Assets

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $17,562      $—       $183       $17,745      

Restricted cash and investments

   213       —        —        213      

Accounts receivable, net

   12,627       —        —        12,627      

Prepaid and other assets

   213       —        3,950        4,163      

Assets attributable to discontinued operations

   —       —        4        4      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

   30,615       —        4,137        34,752      

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net

   836       —        15        851      

Intangible assets, net

   14,681       —        —        14,681      

Deferred tax asset, non-current portion, net

   285       —        18,354        18,639      

Goodwill

   57,203       —        (2,378)       54,825      

Other assets

   140       —        —        140      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $        103,760      $        —       $        20,128       $        123,888      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

        

Current liabilities:

        

Current portion of debt

  $—      $—       $—       $—      

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   3,157       —        1,014        4,171      

Deferred revenue

   22,885       —        —        22,885      

Liabilities attributable to discontinued operations

   —       271        28        299      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   26,042       271        1,042        27,355      

Other long-term liabilities

   420       —        —        420      

Deferred tax liability, net

   23,108       —        (23,108)       —      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   49,570       271        (22,066)       27,775      

Total stockholders’ equity

   54,190       (271)       42,194        96,113      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $103,760      $—       $20,128       $123,888      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Condensed Balance Sheet Data

December 31, 2013

  Reis
    Services    
   Discontinued
    Operations (A)    
       Other (B)           Consolidated     

Assets

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

  $10,347      $—       $213       $10,560      

Restricted cash and investments

   217       —        —        217      

Accounts receivable, net

   11,386       —        —        11,386      

Prepaid and other assets

   187       —        2,601        2,788      

Assets attributable to discontinued operations

   —       —        9        9      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

   22,137       —        2,823        24,960      

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net

   829       —        24        853      

Intangible assets, net

   15,687       —        —        15,687      

Deferred tax asset, non-current portion, net

   285       —        21,032        21,317      

Goodwill

   57,203       —        (2,378)       54,825      

Other assets

   225       —        —        225      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $96,366      $—       $21,501       $117,867      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

        

Current liabilities:

        

Current portion of debt

  $—      $—       $—       $—      

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   2,623       —        956        3,579      

Liability for option cancellations

   —       —        268        268      

Deferred revenue

   20,284       —        —        20,284      

Liabilities attributable to discontinued operations

   —       271        71        342      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   22,907       271        1,295        24,473      

Other long-term liabilities

   523       —        —        523      

Deferred tax liability, net

   18,957       —        (18,957)       —      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   42,387       271        (17,662)       24,996      

Total stockholders’ equity

   53,979       (271)       39,163        92,871      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $96,366      $        —      $21,501       $117,867      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)            

Condensed Balance Sheet Data                    

December 31, 2017                    

  Reis
Services
   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Assets

      

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $18,990     $681     $19,671   

Accounts receivable, net

   9,745      —      9,745   

Prepaid and other assets

   502      179      681   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

   29,237      860      30,097   

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net

   4,919      —      4,919   

Intangible assets, net

   19,474      —      19,474   

Deferred tax asset, net

   285      11,787      12,072   

Goodwill

   57,203      (2,378)     54,825   

Other assets

   217      —      217   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $111,335     $10,269     $121,604   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

Current liabilities:

      

Current portion of debt

  $—     $—     $—   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   3,421      729      4,150   

Deferred revenue

   26,534      —      26,534   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   29,955      729      30,684   

Other long-term liabilities

   2,447      —      2,447   

Deferred tax liability, net

   34,862      (34,862)     —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   67,264      (34,133)     33,131   

Total stockholders’ equity

   44,071      44,402      88,473   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $111,335     $10,269     $121,604   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Condensed Balance Sheet Data                    

December 31, 2016                    

  Reis
Services
   Other (A)   Consolidated 

Assets

      

Current assets:

      

Cash and cash equivalents

  $19,903     $1,588     $21,491   

Accounts receivable, net

   10,744      —      10,744   

Prepaid and other assets

   622      170      792   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

   31,269      1,758      33,027   

Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net

   5,260      —      5,260   

Intangible assets, net

   17,922      —      17,922   

Deferred tax asset, net

   285      16,530      16,815   

Goodwill

   57,203      (2,378)     54,825   

Other assets

   295      —      295   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

  $112,234     $15,910     $128,144   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

      

Current liabilities:

      

Current portion of debt

  $—     $—     $—   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

   3,724      307      4,031   

Deferred revenue

   25,031      —      25,031   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   28,755      307      29,062   

Other long-term liabilities

   1,902      —      1,902   

Deferred tax liability, net

   32,909      (32,909)     —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   63,566      (32,602)     30,964   

Total stockholders’ equity

   48,668      48,512      97,180   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $112,234     $15,910     $128,144   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(A)

Includes the assets and liabilities of the Company’s discontinued operations, to the extent that such assets and liabilities existed at the date presented.

(B)

Includes cash, other assets and liabilities not specifically attributable to or allocable to a specific operatingthe Reis Services segment.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Segment Information (continued)

 

                                                                                                                     
(amounts in thousands)                       

Condensed Operating Data for the

Year Ended December 31, 2014

  Reis
    Services    
   Discontinued
    Operations (A)    
       Other (B)           Consolidated     

Condensed Operating Data for the

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 Reis
Services
 Other (A) Consolidated 

Revenue:

   

Subscription revenue

 $46,802    $—    $46,802   

Other revenue

  1,388     —     1,388   
 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Subscription revenue

  $41,335      $—      $—      $41,335    

Cost of sales of subscription revenue

   8,037       —       —       8,037    

Total revenue

  48,190     —     48,190   

Cost of sales

  12,565     —     12,565   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   33,298       —       —       33,298      35,625     —     35,625   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses:

           

Sales and marketing

   10,235       —       —       10,235      12,626     —     12,626   

Product development

   3,473       —       —       3,473      4,696     —     4,696   

General and administrative expenses

   7,940       —       4,101       12,041      11,225     4,518     15,743   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

   21,648       —       4,101       25,749      28,547     4,518     33,065   

Other income (expenses):

           

Interest and other income

   22       —       —       22      1     2     3   

Interest expense

   (113)      —       —       (113)     (130)    —     (130)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other income (expenses)

   (91)      —       —       (91)     (129)    2     (127)  
  

 

 �� 

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $        11,559      $—      $(4,101)     $7,458    

Income (loss) before income taxes

 $6,949    $(4,516)   $2,433   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

(Loss) from discontinued operations, before income taxes

  $—      $        (31)     $(920)     $(951)   

Condensed Operating Data for the

Year Ended December 31, 2016

 Reis
Services
 Other (A) Consolidated 

Revenue:

   

Subscription revenue

 $45,399    $—    $45,399   

Other revenue

  2,131     —     2,131   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Condensed Operating Data for the

Year Ended December 31, 2013

  Reis
    Services    
   Discontinued
    Operations (A)    
       Other (B)           Consolidated     

Subscription revenue

  $34,721      $—      $—      $34,721    

Cost of sales of subscription revenue

   6,974       —       —       6,974    

Total revenue

  47,530     —     47,530   

Cost of sales

  10,999     —     10,999   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   27,747       —       —       27,747      36,531     —     36,531   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses:

           

Sales and marketing

   8,350       —       —       8,350      11,879     —     11,879   

Product development

   3,122       —       —       3,122      4,167     —     4,167   

General and administrative expenses

   6,989       —       4,920       11,909      11,572     4,093     15,665   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

   18,461       —       4,920       23,381      27,618     4,093     31,711   

Other income (expenses):

           

Interest and other income

   10       —       —       10      22     —     22   

Interest expense

   (113)      —       —       (113)     (108)    —     (108)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other income (expenses)

   (103)      —       —       (103)     (86)    —     (86)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $9,183      $—      $(4,920)     $4,263    

Income (loss) before income taxes

 $8,827    $(4,093)   $4,734   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

(Loss) from discontinued operations, before income taxes

  $        —      $        (9)     $        (557)     $        (566)   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(A)

Includes the results of the Company’s discontinued operations to the extent that such operations existed during the periods presented.

(B)

Includes interest and other income, depreciation expense and general and administrative expenses that have not been allocated to the operating segments.Reis Services segment.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Segment Information (continued)

 

                                                                                                                     
(amounts in thousands)                       

Condensed Operating Data for the

Year Ended December 31, 2012

  Reis
    Services    
   Discontinued
    Operations (A)    
       Other (B)           Consolidated     

Condensed Operating Data for the

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 Reis
Services
 Other (A) Consolidated 

Revenue:

   

Subscription revenue

  $        31,229      $        —      $        —      $        31,229     $43,722    $—    $43,722   

Cost of sales of subscription revenue

   6,617       —       —       6,617    

Other revenue

  7,168     —     7,168   
 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total revenue

  50,890     —     50,890   

Cost of sales

  9,081     —     9,081   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   24,612       —       —       24,612      41,809     —     41,809   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses:

           

Sales and marketing

   7,643       —       —       7,643      11,701     —     11,701   

Product development

   2,485       —       —       2,485      3,711     —     3,711   

General and administrative expenses

   6,696       —       5,098       11,794      9,892     4,375   14,267   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

   16,824       —       5,098       21,922      25,304     4,375   29,679   

Other income (expenses):

           

Interest and other income

   50       —       1       51      38     —     38   

Interest expense

   (155)      —       —       (155)     (92)    —     (92)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other income (expenses)

   (105)      —       1       (104)     (54)    —     (54)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations

  $7,683      $—      $(5,097)     $2,586     $16,451    $(4,375)   $12,076   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, before income taxes

 $—    $3,643    $3,643   
 

 

  

 

  

 

 

(Loss) from discontinued operations, before income taxes

  $—      $(393)     $(11,904)     $(12,297)   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(A)

Includes the results of the Company’s discontinued operations tofor the extent that such operations existed during the periods presented.

(B)

Includesyear ended December 31, 2015 and includes interest and other income, depreciation expense and general and administrative expenses that have not been allocated to the operating segments.

Reis Services segment.

Reis Services

See Note 1 for a description of Reis Services’s business and products at December 31, 2014.2017.

The Company’s largest individual subscribercustomer accounted for 2.9%4.4%, 3.4%6.3% and 4.2%10.6% of Reis Services’s total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Included in other revenue was $1,200,000 and $4,519,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, associated with custom data deliverables and portfolio advisory services related to one customer.

The following table presents the accounts receivable balances of Reis Services at December 31, 20142017 and 2013:2016:

 

December 31,                                                                               
2014 2013   December 31, 
  2017   2016 

Accounts receivable

$12,679,000     $11,465,000       $9,937,000     $10,862,000   

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 (52,000)     (79,000)       (192,000)     (118,000)  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

$      12,627,000     $      11,386,000       $9,745,000     $10,744,000   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Thirty-oneTwenty-one subscribers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 65.0%51.5% of Reis Services’s accounts receivable at December 31, 2014,2017, including fourthree subscribers in excess of 4.0% and the largest representing 9.4%9.2%. Through February 27, 2015,March 2, 2018, the Company received payments of approximately $9,773,000$7,850,000 or 77.1%79.0%, against the December 31, 20142017 accounts receivable balance. Twenty-fiveTwenty-three subscribers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 59.1%52.4% of Reis Services’s accounts receivable at December 31, 2013,2016, including fourtwo subscribers in excess of 4.0% and the largest representing 10.4%8.3%.

At December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the largest individual subscriber accounted for 5.2%6.4% and 5.9%,3.7% respectively, of deferred revenue.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Segment Information (continued)

 

Discontinued Operations – Residential Development Activities

Income (loss) from discontinued operations iswas comprised of the following:following for the year ended December 31, 2015 (there were no discontinued operations activities for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016):

 

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   2012 

Litigation recoveries

  $                26,000       $                80,000       $                713,000     

Litigation charge, net

   —        —        (12,260,000)    

Other (expenses), net

   (977,000)       (646,000)       (750,000)    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) from discontinued operations before income tax

 (951,000)     (566,000)     (12,297,000)    

Income tax (benefit) from discontinued operations

 (382,000)     (230,000)     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax (benefit)

$(569,000)    $(336,000)    $(12,297,000)    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
For the Year Ended
    December 31, 2015    

Litigation recoveries

 $4,839,000   

Other (expenses), net

(1,196,000)  

Income from discontinued operations before income tax

3,643,000   

Income tax expense from discontinued operations

1,409,000   

Income from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

 $2,234,000   

In September 2009, the Company sold the final unit at Gold Peak, the final phase of Palomino Park, a five phase multifamily residential development in Highlands Ranch, Colorado. Gold Peak was a 259 unit259-unit condominium project on the remaining 29 acre land parcel at Palomino Park. On March 13, 2012, in connection with litigation regarding construction defects at the Gold Peak project, a jury rendered its verdict whereby Reis, one of its subsidiaries (Gold Peak at Palomino Park LLC, the developer of the project (“GP LLC”)), and the construction manager/general contractor for the project (Tri-Star(Tri-Star Construction West, LLC(“Tri-Star”)) were found jointly and severally liable for an aggregate of $18,200,000, plus other costs of approximately $756,000. The Company recorded a charge of $14,216,000 during the first quarter of 2012. On June 20, 2012, following denial of all of the defendants’ post-trial motions, Reis and its subsidiaries reached a settlement with the plaintiff, the Gold Peak homeowners association,Homeowners Association, (“GP HOA”) providing for a total payment of $17,000,000. Of this amount, $5,000,000 was paid on August 3, 2012 and the remaining $12,000,000 was paid on October 15, 2012, in accordance with the settlement terms. As a resultSubsequent to that date, the Company began recovery efforts against other responsible parties involved in the design, development, construction and supervision of the Gold Peak project.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company entered into the final settlement inagreement related to its Gold Peak recovery efforts, bringing closure to this process. In summary, recovery efforts from the secondfourth quarter of 2012 through December 31, 2015 resulted in cash collections aggregating approximately $5,658,000 from multiple insurance carriers, trial attorneys, an insurance broker and other responsible parties involved in the Company reversed $1,956,000design, development, construction and supervision of the previously recorded charge, resultingGold Peak project. The Company recovered approximately $4,839,000 in the net litigation charge for the year ended December 31, 2012 of approximately $12,260,000.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company had litigation recoveries of $26,000, $80,000 and $713,000, respectively, from insurance carriers and other responsible parties.2015. Other expenses primarily reflectin 2015 included legal and other professional costs incurred related to the Gold Peak litigation. For additional information pertaining to the Gold Peak litigation see Note 10.recovery efforts.

4.

Restricted Cash and Investments

Restricted cash and investments represents a security deposit for the 530 Fifth Avenue corporate office space. The Company provided the lessor a bank-issued letter of credit, which is fully collateralized by a certificate of deposit issued by that bank. The restricted cash balance was approximately $213,000 and $217,000 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

5.

4.    Intangible Assets

The amount of identified intangible assets, including the respective amounts of accumulated amortization, are as follows:

 

  December 31,   December 31, 
  2014   2013   2017   2016 

Database

  $                19,435,000       $                17,149,000        $33,538,000       $28,146,000    

Accumulated amortization

   (15,018,000)       (13,238,000)       (23,705,000)      (19,974,000)   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Database, net

   4,417,000        3,911,000        9,833,000       8,172,000    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Customer relationships

   14,100,000        14,100,000        14,100,000       14,100,000    

Accumulated amortization

   (7,379,000)       (6,417,000)       (10,182,000)      (9,263,000)   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Customer relationships, net

   6,721,000        7,683,000        3,918,000       4,837,000    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Website

   11,936,000        10,402,000        20,729,000       17,538,000    

Accumulated amortization

   (8,876,000)       (7,095,000)       (15,006,000)      (12,624,000)   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Website, net

   3,060,000        3,307,000        5,723,000       4,914,000    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Acquired below market lease

   2,800,000        2,800,000     

Accumulated amortization

   (2,317,000)       (2,014,000)    
  

 

   

 

 

Acquired below market lease, net

   483,000        786,000     
  

 

   

 

 

Intangibles, net

  $14,681,000       $15,687,000        $            19,474,000       $            17,923,000    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

With respect to the database intangible asset, the Company capitalized approximately $5,392,000 and $5,356,000 during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Separately, for the website intangible asset, the Company capitalized approximately $3,191,000 and $2,803,000 during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Amortization expense for intangible assets aggregated approximately $7,031,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, of which approximately $3,731,000 related to the database, which is charged to cost of sales, approximately $919,000 related to customer relationships, which is charged to sales and marketing expense and approximately $2,381,000 related to website development, which is charged to product development expense, all in the Reis Services segment.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Intangible Assets (continued)

 

The Company capitalized approximately $2,286,000 and $1,974,000 to the database intangible asset and $1,537,000 and $2,077,000 to the website intangible asset during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Amortization expense for intangible assets aggregated approximately $4,829,000$5,923,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, of which approximately $1,780,000$2,853,000 related to the database, which is charged to cost of sales, approximately $962,000$935,000 related to customer relationships, which is charged to sales and marketing expense, approximately $1,784,000$1,955,000 related to website development, and approximately $180,000 related to the value ascribed to the below market terms of the office lease, which iswas charged to productgeneral and administrative expense, all in the Reis Services segment. The lease value intangible asset was fully amortized in 2016. Amortization expense for intangible assets aggregated approximately $5,148,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, of which approximately $2,103,000 related to the database, approximately $949,000 related to customer relationships, approximately $1,793,000 related to website development, expense, and approximately $303,000 related to the value ascribed to the below market terms of the office lease, which is charged to general and administrative expense, all in the Reis Services segment. Amortization expense for intangible assets aggregated approximately $4,697,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, of which approximately $1,547,000 related to the database, approximately $973,000 related to customer relationships, approximately $1,875,000 related to website development, and approximately $302,000 related to the value ascribed to the below market terms of the office lease. Amortization expense for intangible assets aggregated approximately $4,629,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, of which approximately $1,907,000 related to the database, approximately $982,000 related to customer relationships, approximately $1,436,000 related to website development, and approximately $304,000 related to the value ascribed to the below market terms of the office lease, all in the Reis Services segment.

The Company’s future amortization expense related to the net intangible asset balance at December 31, 20142017 follows:

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

Amount           Amount         

2015

$4,552,000      

2016

 3,424,000      

2017

 2,131,000      

2018

 1,367,000        $7,398,000     

2019

 1,058,000         5,729,000     

2020

   3,618,000     

2021

   1,816,000     

2022

   868,000     

Thereafter

 2,149,000         45,000     
  

 

   

 

 

Total

$        14,681,000        $19,474,000     
  

 

   

 

 

 

6.5.

Debt

The Company hashad no debt outstanding at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

In October 2012, Reis Services, as borrower, and the Company, as guarantor, entered into a loan and security agreement with Capital One, National Association, as lender (“Capital One”), for a $10,000,000 revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”“2012 Revolver”). The 2012 Revolver hashad a three year term which is setscheduled to expire on October 16, 2015,2015; however, the expiration date was extended to January 31, 2016. In January 2016, Reis Services and anyCapital One executed an amended and restated loan and security agreement for a $20,000,000 revolving credit facility with terms substantially similar to the 2012 Revolver (as amended, the “2016 Revolver,” and collectively with the 2012 Revolver, the “Revolver”). The 2016 Revolver expires on January 28, 2019. Any borrowings on the Revolver bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 2.00% per annum (for LIBOR loans) or the greater of 1.00% or the bank’s prime rate minus 0.50% per annum (for base rate loans) and is subject to. Capital One charges an unused facility fee of 0.25% per annum. The Company paid a commitment fee of $50,000 in connection with the closing. The Revolver is secured by a security interest in substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of Reis Services, all copyrights of the Company and a pledge by the Company of its membership interests in Reis Services. The Revolver also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including minimum financial covenants, as defined in the amended and restated revolving loan credit agreement; all of the covenants were met at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016. No borrowings were made on the Revolver during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 or 2012.2017 and 2016.

During 2012, the Company repaid the remaining outstanding balance

6.Income Taxes

The components of $5,691,000 in connection with borrowings under a credit agreement, dated October 11, 2006, with the Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch,income tax expense are as administrative agent, and BMO Capital Markets, as lead arranger. Loan proceeds were used to finance $25,000,000 of the cash portion of the Merger consideration. The final scheduled maturity date of all amounts borrowed pursuant to the credit agreement was September 30, 2012. The interest rate during 2012 was LIBOR + 1.50%.follows:

                       For the Years  Ended December 31,                 
               2017                           2016                           2015             

Current Federal alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) expense

  $20,000      $147,000     $303,000    

Current state and local tax expense

   225,000       40,000      662,000    

Deferred Federal tax expense (A)

   5,736,000       1,704,000      4,962,000    

Deferred state and local tax (benefit) expense

   (390,000)      62,000      (513,000)   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated income tax expense, including taxes attributable to discontinued operations (B)

   5,591,000       1,953,000      5,414,000    

Less income tax expense attributable to discontinued operations

   —       —      1,409,000    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense (C)

  $5,591,000      $1,953,000     $4,005,000    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

      

(A)  Includes an AMT (benefit) of $(20,000), $(147,000) and $(303,000) in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(B)  Includes income tax expense attributable to income from discontinued operations.

(C)  Reflects the tax expense from continuing operations as reported on the consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented.

   

   

   

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Income Taxes (continued)

 

7.

Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   2012 

Current Federal alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) expense

  $92,000       $42,000     $—     

Current state and local tax expense

   254,000        132,000      187,000     

Deferred Federal tax expense (benefit) (A)

                   2,118,000                        (12,775,000)                     (5,279,000)    

Deferred state and local tax expense (benefit)

   (4,000)       (1,299,000)     (335,000)    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated income tax expense (benefit), including taxes
attributable to discontinued operations (B)

   2,460,000        (13,900,000)     (5,427,000)    

Less income tax expense (benefit) attributable to discontinued
operations

   (382,000)       (230,000)     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit) (C)

  $2,842,000       $(13,670,000)    $(5,427,000)    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

            

(A)

Includes an AMT (benefit) of $(92,000) and $(1,181,000) in 2014 and 2013, respectively.

(B)

Includes income tax (benefit) attributable to (loss) from discontinued operations.

(C)

Reflects the tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations as reported on the consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented.

The reconciliation of income tax computed at the U.S. Federal statutory rate to income tax expense (benefit) on continuing operations is as follows:

 

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   2012 
   Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent 

Tax expense (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate

  $2,610,000      35.00%    $        1,492,000                  35.00%     $        (3,399,000)                 (35.00%)  

State and local tax expense (benefit), net of Federal impact

   194,000      2.60%     86,000      2.01%      (96,000)     (0.99%)  

Impact of state and local tax rate change net of Federal impact

   27,000      0.36%     110,000      2.58%      6,000      0.06%   

Cost (benefit) attributable to valuation allowance, net

   —      —        (150,000)     (3.52%)     3,671,000      37.80%   

Non-deductible items

   11,000      0.15%     9,000      0.21%      5,000      0.05%   

Benefit attributable to reduction in allowance against certain deferred tax assets

   —      —        (15,217,000)     (356.94%)     (5,614,000)     (57.81%)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  $        2,842,000                  38.11%    $(13,670,000)     (320.66%)    $(5,427,000)     (55.89%)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded an aggregate deferred Federal, state and local income tax benefit of $15,217,000 and $5,614,000, respectively, from the release of the valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets. In the fourth quarters of 2013 and 2012, the Company reversed the valuation allowance recorded against a portion of its NOL carryforwards in 2012, and the remaining balance of the valuation allowance against NOL and AMT credit carryforwards in 2013. The decision to reduce the valuation allowance in each period was made after management determined, based on an assessment of continuing operations, profitability and forecasts of future taxable income, that these deferred tax assets would be realized in the future.

Separately, during the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company also reevaluated the availability of state operating loss carryforwards and modified the future effective state and local tax rate. As a result, the future tax benefit was reduced by approximately $346,000 during the year ended December 31, 2013.

During March 2014, New York State enacted a law to (1) reduce corporate tax rates, effective in future years and (2) change the method of determining the availability and use of NOLs existing at December 31, 2014. As a consequence, the Company evaluated all elements affecting the balance of its net deferred tax assets, including the availability of New York State and New York City NOL carryforwards and the changes in the New York State law and are reflected in the 2014 income tax expense.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Income Taxes (continued)

In January 2015, New York City proposed that it would change its tax laws to conform with the New York State changes. The Company will assess the impact of changes for New York City when a law is enacted.

                                                For the Years Ended December 31,                                              
  2017  2016  2015 
  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 

Tax expense at U.S. statutory rate

 $851,000      35.00%     $1,657,000     35.00%    $4,227,000      35.00%     

State and local tax expense, net of Federal impact

  119,000      4.89%      142,000     3.00%     494,000      4.09%     

Impact of state and local tax rate change, net of Federal impact

  10,000      0.41%      7,000     0.15%     (714,000)      (5.90%)   

Impact of Federal rate change

  5,142,000      211.38%      —     —     —      —     

Non-deductible items

  53,000      2.16%      147,000     3.10%     (2,000)     (0.02%)   

Windfall tax benefit

  (584,000)     (24.01)%     —     —     —      —     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense

 $        5,591,000                  229.83%     $        1,953,000                 41.25%    $        4,005,000                  33.17%   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Due to the amount of its NOL and credit carryforwards, the Company does not anticipate paying Federal income taxes for a number of years. The Company expects, in the future, that it will be subject to cash payments for Federal AMTincome, state and local taxes where the Company has established nexus and there are no available NOLs, and for a portion of its state and local income taxes as the changedfor New York State tax rules and anticipated New York City rulesdue to laws enacted in March 2014 and April 2015, respectively, which limit the amount of existing NOLs which could be used each year.

The changes in New York City law were reflected in the second quarter of 2015 income tax expense. Given the change in the New York City law, there was a variation between the effective tax rate and the statutory tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2015.

On December 22, 2017, the Federal government of the United States enacted the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“the Tax Act”), which significantly changed existing U.S. tax laws, including a reduction in the Federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, repeal of corporate Federal “AMT” and a refund of certain existing AMT credits over several years, introduction of a capital investment deduction, limitation of the interest deduction, limitation of the use of net operating losses incurred on or after January 1, 2018 to offset future taxable income, limitation of the deduction for compensation paid to certain executive officers and extensive changes to the U.S. international tax system, as well as other changes. These changes generally took effect on January 1, 2018. The U.S. Treasury department is expected to release regulations implementing the Tax Act and the U.S. tax laws may be further amended in the future. The Company’s federal net operating losses that have been incurred prior to December 31, 2017 will continue to have a20-year carryforward limitation applied and will need to be evaluated for recoverability in the future as such. Net operating losses incurred after December 31, 2017 will have an indefinite life, but usage will be limited to 80% of taxable income in any given year. On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to finalize the accounting. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply its current tax accounting on the basis of the provision of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before the enactment of the Tax Act. As a result, the consolidated statements of operations reflect a net expense of $5,142,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from there-measurement of our net Federal deferred tax assets to the lower corporate tax rate, which we are reporting provisionally. While the Company was able to make reasonable estimates of the impact of the reduction in the Federal corporate rate, the final impact of the Tax Act may differ from these estimates, including, but not limited to, changes in our interpretations and assumptions, additional guidance that may be issued by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) return to provision differences and state rate adjustments. The Company is continuing to gather additional information to determine the final impact.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The net deferred tax asset was approximately $22,437,000$12,072,000 and $23,789,000$16,815,000 at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, all of which $3,798,000 and $2,472,000 is reflectedwas classified as a net current asset in prepaid and other assets and $18,639,000 and $21,317,000 is reflected separately as a net non-current asset in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, respectively.non-current. The significant portion of the deferred tax items relates to deferred tax assets including NOL carryforwards, Federal AMT credit carryforwards and stock based compensation, with the remainder of the deferred tax items relating to liabilities resulting from the

intangible assets recorded at the time of the Merger. The significant component of the decrease in the deferred tax asset balance in 2017 is due to there-measurement as described above.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Income Taxes (continued)

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

 

December 31,                       December 31,                      
2014 2013                       2017                                            2016                  

Deferred Tax Assets

        
    

Net operating loss carryforwards

$                    22,113,983    $                    23,771,675      $9,952,569   $14,561,655 

Asset basis differences — tax amount greater than book value

 259,922     263,944    

Liability reserves

 212,142     212,376       652,000    792,075 

Reserve for option cancellations

 —     99,689    

Stock compensation plans

 1,520,041     1,598,969       979,947    1,828,185 

AMT credit carryforwards

 1,273,792     1,181,423       1,736,984    1,717,792 

Other

 21,585     31,167       253,538    57,153 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
 25,401,465     27,159,243       13,575,038    18,956,860 

Valuation allowance

 —     —       —      —   
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

 25,401,465     27,159,243       13,575,038    18,956,860 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred Tax Liabilities

        
    

Acquired asset differences — book value greater than tax

 (2,669,655)    (3,145,741)      (1,025,930)    (1,842,450) 

Asset basis differences — carrying amount value greater than tax

 (295,073)    (224,982)      (476,990)    (299,673) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 (2,964,728)    (3,370,723)      (1,502,920)    (2,142,123) 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

$22,436,737    $23,788,520    

Net deferred tax asset

  $12,072,118   $16,814,737 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The Company hashad Federal NOL carryforwards aggregating approximately $61,165,000$37,859,000 at December 31, 2014,2017, as well as significant state and local NOL carryforwards. These NOLs include NOLsincluded amounts generated subsequent to the Merger (including a substantial NOL realized during the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of a litigation settlement, discussed in Note 3), losses from the Reis Services business prior to the Merger and the Company’s operating losses prior to the Merger. Approximately $20,317,000$5,140,000 of these Federal NOLs are subject to an annual Internal Revenue Code Section 382 limitation of $2,779,000, whereas the remaining balance of approximately $40,848,000$32,719,000 is not subject to such athe limitation. There is an annual limitation on the use of NOLs after an ownership change, pursuant to Section 382The enactment of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result of the Merger, the Company experienced such an ownership change which resulted in a new annual limitation of $2,779,000. Because of the accumulation of annual limitations, it is expected that the use of NOLs will not be limited by expiration. The 2014 New York State law discussed above and the anticipated conforming changes to the2015 New York City law limitsdiscussed above limit the amount of existing NOLs which could be used each year in those jurisdictions; however, all such lossesNOLs are expected to be fully utilized in the future. A substantial NOL was realized during the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the Gold Peak litigation settlement, discussed in Note 10.

A further requirement of the tax rules is that after a corporation experiences an ownership change, it must satisfy the continuity of business enterprise, or COBE, requirement (which generally requires that a corporation continue its historic business or use a

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Income Taxes (continued)

significant portion of its historic business assets in its business for the two year period beginning on the date of the ownership change) to be able to utilize NOLs generated prior to such ownership change. The Company believes that the COBE requirement was met through the required two year period subsequent to the ownership change. In February 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) completed an audit of the Company’s 2009 Federal income tax return. The 2009 tax year included the end of the two year period subsequent to the Merger. The IRS issued a no change letter related to the Company’s 2009 tax return, thereby accepting the Company’s position that the two year COBE requirement was met.

The next NOL expiration for the Company is in 20182024 for approximately $252,000$2,513,000 of Federal NOLs. Included in the Federal NOLs at December 31, 20142017 is approximately $1,723,000 attributable to excess tax deductions from the issuance of common shares as non-cash compensationon equity award activity in prior years. ThePrior to January 1, 2017, the tax benefits attributable to those NOLs will bewere credited directly to additional paid in capital when utilized to offset taxes payable.

A valuation allowance is required to reduce deferred tax assets if, based In 2017, these NOLs were recorded on the weightCompany’s consolidated balance sheet upon adoption of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As a result of management’s evaluation of the Company’s future operations, it has been determined that no valuation allowance was necessary at either December 31, 2014 or 2013. Management determined that a valuation allowance of approximately $15,217,000 was necessary at December 31, 2012. The allowance at December 31, 2012 related primarily to NOL carryforwards and AMT credits. The decreaseASU2016-09, as described in the allowance in 2012 was primarily attributable to the $5,614,000 increase in deferred tax assets expected to be realized in the years subsequent to December 31, 2012, offset in part by the litigation settlement payments made in 2012, net of recoveries, which resulted in an increase to the 2012 NOL.Note 2.

The Company and its subsidiaries have been audited by the Federal tax authoritiesIRS for 2009 and the 2012 Federal tax return is currently under audit.year, which audit was completed in February 2015 with the IRS issuing a no change letter. The 2014, 2015 and 2016 Federal tax returns are open for 2011 and 2013.examination. All prior Federal periods are closed, except to the extent that NOLs werean NOL was generated in a given year. Tax returns for 1997year and 1998 aresuch NOL was utilized during an open fortax year or will be utilized in the NOLs generated during those years from an acquired business at that time. The Reis Services business prior tofuture.

During the Merger, was audited bythird quarter of 2015, audits of the IRSCompany and its consolidated subsidiaries for tax years ending October 31, 20052004 through 2006 were completed by New York State resulting in net payments aggregating approximately $16,000 in the period to New York State and 2006. In addition,New York City. Such amounts had been accrued in prior periods. With few exceptions, the state and local income tax returns are open from 2000 to 2002 and 2007, to the extent that NOLs were generated during these periods by the Reis Services business prior to the Merger.

Tax returns for the Company and a subsidiary are under audit by the State of New Yorkexamination for the years 2004 to 2006 and are open for the years 2007 to 2013. As a result of the New York State audit, New York City returns are open for the years 2004 to 2013 as well. The tax years for another subsidiary, operating in Colorado are open from 2010 to 2012.2014 through 2016.

The Company’s reserve for unrecognized tax benefits, including estimated interest, was $105,000$31,000 and $62,000$154,000 at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. The unrecognized tax benefits as well as related interest was included in general and administrative expenses. The Company recorded an additional provision,expense, including interest, of $43,000$3,000 in 2017, a reduction in expense of $(4,000) in 2016 and $51,000additional expense, including interest, of $70,000 in 2014 and 2013, respectively. 2015.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Income Taxes (continued)

A reconciliation of the unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 follows:

 

For the Years Ended December 31,                       For the Years  Ended December 31,                     
2014 2013 2012   2017   2016   2015 

Balance at beginning of period

$62,000     $345,000     $145,000      $154,000       $159,000       $105,000     

Additional provisions and interest related to prior years

 43,000      51,000      200,000    

Additional provision (reduction) and interest related to prior years, net

   3,000        (4,000)       70,000     

Resolution of matters during the period

 —      (334,000)     —       (126,000)       (1,000)       (16,000)    
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balance at end of period

$                105,000     $                  62,000     $                345,000      $31,000       $154,000       $159,000     
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The Company expects that a substantial portion of the 20142017 balance could be resolved in 2015.2018.

 

8.7.

Stockholders’ Equity

On August 30, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) authorized a program to purchase an aggregate of $5,000,000 of the Company’s common stock. Purchases under the program may be made from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Depending on market conditions, financial developments and other factors, these purchases may be commenced or suspended at any time, or from time to time, without prior notice and may be expanded without prior notice. The Company may make purchases pursuant to a trading plan under Securities Exchange Act Rule10b5-1, permitting open market purchases of common stock during blackout periods.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017 and 2012,2016, the Company purchased an aggregate of 182,028 and 54,176 shares of common stock for approximately $3,421,000 and $1,144,000, respectively. From the inception of the repurchase program to December 31, 2017, the Company purchased an aggregate of 236,204 shares for approximately $4,565,000, or an average price of $19.33 per share, leaving approximately $435,000 at December 31, 2017 that may be used to purchase additional shares under the repurchase program in the future. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock.

The Company commenced a quarterly dividend program in the second quarter of 2014 when it declared and paid an initial quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per common share in June 2014. Inshare. The Company increased the third and fourth quarters of 2014, the Companydividends declared and paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per common share in each of September 2014 and December 2014. Aggregate

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Stockholders’ Equity (continued)

dividends paid by the Company during 2014 approximated $3,698,000. On February 2, 2015, the Company announced that it has increased the dividend payable on March 18, 2015 to $0.14 per common share. Althoughshare for all four quarters of 2015, and increased the Company anticipates paying a quarterly dividend hereafter, future dividends are subjectdeclared and paid to approval by the Board. The Company did not declare or distribute any dividends during$0.17 per common share for all four quarters of 2016 and 2017. Dividend payments aggregated approximately $7,876,000, $7,747,000 and $6,338,000 for the years ended December 31, 20132017, 2016 and 2012.2015, respectively.

 

9.8.

Stock Plans and Other Incentives

The Company has adopted certain incentive plans for the purpose of attracting and retaining the Company’s directors, officers and employees by having the ability to issue options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), or stock awards. Awards granted under the Company’s incentive plans expire ten years from the date of grant and vest over periods ranging generally from three to five years for employees.

Option Awards

The following table presents option activity and other plan data for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012:2015:

 

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   2012 
   Options   Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
   Options   Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
   Options   Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding at beginning of period

   627,724       $9.05     645,448       $8.94          663,172         $8.82       

Granted

   20,000       $18.52     —       $—          —         $—       

Exercised

   (56,362)      $(8.25)     (8,862)      $(5.24)         (8,862)        $(4.46)      

Cancelled through cash settlement

   (8,862)      $(4.09)     (8,862)      $(5.24)         (8,862)        $(4.46)      

Forfeited/cancelled/expired

   —       $     —       $—          —         $—       
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Outstanding at end of period

   582,500       $9.52     627,724       $9.05          645,448         $8.94       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Options exercisable at end of period

           562,500       $            9.21             627,724       $            9.05                  420,448         $            9.43       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Options exercisable which can be settled in cash

   —       $     17,724       $4.09          35,448         $4.67       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted per year (per option)

  $7.64         $—         $—         
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Weighted average remaining contractual life at end of period

   3.9 years          4.5 years          5.3 years       

Certain outstanding options had allowed the option holder to receive from the Company, in cancellation of the holder’s option, a cash payment with respect to each cancelled option equal to the amount, if any, by which the fair market value of the share of stock underlying the option exceeds the exercise price of such option. The Company accounted for these options as liability awards. The liability was adjusted at the end of each reporting period to reflect: (1) the net cash payments to option holders made during each period; (2) the impact of the exercise and expiration of options; and (3) the changes in the market price of the Company’s common stock. Changes in the settlement value of option awards treated under the liability method were reflected as an increase to, or a reduction of, expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

At December 31, 2014, there were no options outstanding for which a liability was required as the remaining liability award options were either exercised or settled with a net cash payment. At December 31, 2013, the liability for option cancellations was approximately $268,000 based upon the difference in the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock at December 31, 2013 of $19.23 per share and the individual exercise prices of the outstanding 17,724 “in-the-money” options that were accounted for as a liability award at that date. The Company recorded a compensation benefit of approximately $137,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and compensation expense of approximately $82,000 and $114,000 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations related to the respective changes in the amount of the liability for option cancellations.

In each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, a total of 8,862 options were settled with net cash payments aggregating approximately $132,000, $110,000 and $58,000, respectively.

                                            For the Years Ended December 31,                                          
   2017   2016   2015 
   Options   Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
   Options   Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
   Options   Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding at beginning of period

   530,000        $9.64         547,500        $9.61         582,500        $9.52      

Granted

   —        $—         —        $—         —        $—      

Exercised

   (285,000)       $(10.30)        (17,500)       $(8.74)        (35,000)       $(8.12)     

Forfeited/cancelled/expired

   —        $—         —        $—         —        $—      
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Outstanding at end of period

   245,000        $8.88         530,000        $9.64         547,500        $9.61      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Options exercisable at end of period

   237,000        $8.56         518,000        $9.44         531,500        $9.35      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted per year (per option)

  $—          $—          $—        
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

Weighted average remaining contractual life at end of period

   2.9 years           2.0 years           3.0 years        

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Stock Plans and Other Incentives (continued)

In May 2014, the Company granted 20,000 options to one employee. These options, which are accounted for as an equity award, vest 20% per year over a five-year period and have an exercise price of $18.52 per option, based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. For expense purposes, the Company estimated the fair value of each option granted on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model at $7.64 per option. The following table includes the assumptions that were made and the estimated fair value for option grants in 2014 (no option awards were granted during 2013 or 2012):

 

2014 Grant

Stock price on grant date

$18.52           

Exercise price

$18.52           

Dividend yield

2.38%        

Risk-free interest rate

2.20%        

Expected life

                8.0 years           

Estimated volatility

47.8%        

Fair value of options granted (per option)

$7.64           

The following table presents additional option details at December 31, 20142017 and 2013:2016:

 

  Options Outstanding and Exercisable
at December 31, 2014
   Options Outstanding and Exercisable
at December 31, 2013
   Options Outstanding and Exercisable
at December 31, 2017
   Options Outstanding and Exercisable
at December 31, 2016
 

Range of Exercise Prices

  Outstanding   Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Intrinsic
Value (A)
   Outstanding   Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Intrinsic
Value (A)
   Outstanding   Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Intrinsic
Value (A)
   Outstanding   Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Intrinsic   
Value (A)  
 

$ 4.09(B)

   —       —          $—      $—       17,724       0.7          $4.09      $268,341    

$ 7.50

   47,500       2.6           7.50       886,825       70,000       3.6           7.50       821,100       —           $   $—        10,000      0.6   $7.50   $147,500   

$ 8.03

   225,000       5.6           8.03       4,082,625       225,000       6.6           8.03       2,521,125       225,000      2.6   $8.03    2,840,625      225,000      3.6   $8.03    3,200,625   

$ 10.40

   290,000       2.4           10.40       4,573,300       315,000       3.4           10.40       2,781,450       —           $    —        275,000      0.4   $10.40    3,258,750   

$ 18.52

   20,000       9.4           18.52       153,000       —       —           —       —       20,000      6.4   $18.52    42,600      20,000      7.4   $18.52    74,600   
  

 

       

 

   

 

       

 

   

 

       

 

   

 

       

 

 
   582,500       3.9           9.52      $  9,695,750       627,724       4.5           9.05      $  6,392,016       245,000      2.9   $8.88   $    2,883,225      530,000      2.0   $9.64   $    6,681,475   
  

 

       

 

   

 

       

 

   

 

       

 

   

 

       

 

 

                                

 

(A)

(A)  The intrinsic value is the amount by which the fair value of the Company’s stock price exceeds the exercise price of an option at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. For purposes of this calculation, the Company’s closing stock prices were $26.17$20.65 and $19.23$22.25 per share on December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

(B)

These options are the remaining options accounted for as liability awards.

Dividends are not paid or accrued on unexercised options.

RSU Awards

The following table presents the changes in RSUs outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012:2015:

 

   For the Years Ended December 31, 
   2014   2013   2012 

Outstanding at beginning of period

   365,686        469,848        590,662     

Granted

   105,132        103,176        169,481     

Common stock delivered (A) (B) (C)

   (185,224)       (205,075)       (290,295)    

Forfeited

   (7,621)       (2,263)       —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

   277,973        365,686        469,848     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Intrinsic value (D)

  $                7,275,000       $                7,032,000       $                6,122,000     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

            

(A)

In the 2014 period, all of the vested RSUs were issued as shares.

(B)

The 2013 period includes 80,139 shares which were used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations for 16 employees of approximately $1,280,000 in 2013. A net of 124,936 shares of common stock were delivered in 2013.

(C)

The 2012 period includes 84,367 shares which were used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations for 16 employees of approximately $851,000 in 2012. A net of 133,518 shares of common stock were delivered in 2012.

(D)

For purposes of this calculation, the Company’s closing stock prices were $26.17, $19.23 and $13.03 per share on December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Stock Plans and Other Incentives (continued)

                       For the Years  Ended December 31,         
   2017   2016   2015 

Outstanding at beginning of period

   281,320        254,041        277,973     

Granted

   141,937        124,709        83,141     

Common stock delivered (A) (B) (C)

   (95,443)       (85,181)       (105,970)    

Forfeited

   (9,672)       (12,249)       (1,103)    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

   318,142        281,320        254,041     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Intrinsic value (D)

  $6,570,000       $6,259,000       $6,028,000     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

 

      

(A)  In the 2017 period, all of the vested RSUs were issued as shares.

(B)  The 2016 period includes 32,760 shares which were used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations for 29 employees of approximately $701,000 in 2016. A net of 52,421 shares of common stock were delivered in 2016.

(C)  The 2015 period includes 41,136 shares which were used to settle minimum employee withholding tax obligations for 28 employees of approximately $993,000 in 2015. A net of 64,834 shares of common stock were delivered in 2015.

(D) ��For purposes of this calculation, the Company’s closing stock prices were $20.65, $22.25 and $23.73 per share on December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

   

   

   

   

In February 2014,the year ended December 31, 2017, an aggregate of 91,431134,926 RSUs were granted to employees, which RSUs vestone-third a year over three years and had a weighted average grant date fair value of $18.13$18.63 per RSU. In the year ended December 2014,31, 2016, an aggregate of 6,900 RSUs were granted, which RSUs vest upon the third anniversary of the grant date and had a grant date fair value of $21.71 per RSU. In February 2013, an aggregate of 91,356118,724 RSUs were granted to employees, which RSUs vestone-third a year over three years and had a weighted average grant date fair value of $16.20$20.22 per RSU. In February 2012,the year ended December 31, 2015, an aggregate of 143,78377,405 RSUs were granted to employees, which RSUs vestone-third a year over three years and had a weighted average grant date fair value of $10.05$22.41 per RSU. In each case, theThe grant date fair value was determined based on the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on the applicable date of grant.grant and considers the impact of dividend payments. The awards granted to employees in 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 are treated as equity awards and the grant date fair value is charged to compensation expense at the corporate level on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods. Dividends are not paid or accrued on unvested employee RSUs.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, an aggregate of 6,8017,011 RSUs, 11,8205,985 RSUs and 25,6985,736 RSUs, respectively, were granted tonon-employee directors (with an average grant date fair value of $20.28, $15.56$19.66, $23.04 and $9.54$24.03 per RSU, respectively) related to the equity component of their compensation. In each case, the grant date fair value was determined as of the last trading day of the quarter for which the RSUs were being received as compensation. The RSUs are immediately vested, but are not deliverable to thenon-employee directors until six months after termination of their service as a director. Dividends are paid on RSUs granted tonon-employee directors. The Company issued 40,564

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Stock Plans and 72,410 shares in 2014 and 2012, respectively, to satisfy the settlement of RSUs related to directors that retired from the Board six months prior.Other Incentives (continued)

Option and RSU Expense Information

The Company recordednon-cash compensation expense of approximately $1,702,000, $1,859,000$2,211,000, $2,099,000 and $2,181,000,$1,773,000, respectively, including approximately $138,000 $173,000 and $222,000in each year related tonon-employee director equity compensation, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively, related to all stock options and RSUs accounted for as equity awards, as a component of general and administrative expenses in the statements of operations.

At December 31, 2014,2017, the total compensation cost related to outstanding,non-vested equity awards of options and RSUs that is expected to be recognized as compensation cost in the future aggregates approximately $2,000,000.$2,549,000. It does not include any awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2014.2017 and does not estimate for any potential forfeitures in the future.

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

  Options   RSUs   Total   Options   RSUs   Total 

2015

  $31,000        $            1,107,000        $            1,138,000      

2016

   31,000         666,000         697,000      

2017

   31,000         92,000         123,000      

2018

   31,000         —         31,000        $31,000   $1,568,000   $1,599,000 

2019

   11,000         —         11,000         12,000    870,000    882,000 
2020       68,000    68,000 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $            135,000        $1,865,000        $2,000,000        $            43,000   $            2,506,000   $            2,549,000 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

10.9.

Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

From time to time, the Company has been, is or may in the future be a defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. The Company records a provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.

Reis has purchased insurance with respect to construction defect and completed operations at its past real estate development projects. Reis has, from time to time, been exposed to various claims associated with the development, construction and sale of condominium units, single family homes or lots. Claims related to dissatisfaction by homeowners and homeowners associations with the construction of condominiums, homes and amenities by us and/or our developer partners in any condominium or subdivision development, or other matters, may result in litigation costs, remediation costs, warranty expenses or settlement costs which could be material to the Company’s reportable discontinued operating income (loss), or its consolidated financial position or cash flows. It would not have any effect on the Company’s income from continuing operations.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

Reis, Inc. and two of its subsidiaries (GP LLC and Wellsford Park Highlands Corp. (“WPHC”)) were the subject of a suit brought by the homeowners association at the Company’s former 259-unit Gold Peak condominium project outside of Denver, Colorado. This suit was filed in District Court in Douglas County, Colorado on October 19, 2010, seeking monetary damages (not quantified at the time) relating to design and construction defects at the Gold Peak project. Tri-Star, the construction manager/general contractor for the project (not affiliated with Reis) and two former senior officers of Reis, Inc. (Jeffrey H. Lynford, who was also previously a director of the Company, and David M. Strong) were also named as defendants in the suit. In October 2011, experts for the plaintiff delivered a report alleging a cost to repair of approximately $19,000,000. Trial commenced on February 21, 2012 and a jury rendered its verdict on March 13, 2012 finding Reis, GP LLC and Tri-Star jointly and severally liable for an aggregate of $18,200,000, plus other costs of approximately $756,000.

As of December 31, 2011, based on the best available information at that time, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $4,460,000 in discontinued operations, representing the low end of the Company’s expected range of net exposure. This amount reflected an aggregate minimum liability of approximately $7,740,000, less the then minimum expected insurance recovery of $3,000,000 and other previously reserved amounts. At March 31, 2012, as a result of the verdict, the Company recorded an additional charge of $14,216,000 in discontinued operations in the first quarter of 2012, to bring the Company’s liability up to the $18,200,000 judgment, plus other costs of approximately $756,000. As of March 31, 2012, the Company, in accordance with the applicable accounting literature, could no longer conclude that $3,000,000 of insurance was probable of being recovered. These charges were reflected in discontinued operations and negatively impacted consolidated net income (loss), but did not impact income from continuing operations.

On June 20, 2012, following denial of all of the defendants’ post-trial motions, Reis, GP LLC and WPHC reached a settlement with the plaintiff, the Gold Peak homeowners association, providing for a total payment of $17,000,000. Of this amount, $5,000,000 was paid on August 3, 2012 and the remaining $12,000,000 was paid on October 15, 2012, in accordance with the settlement terms. In reaching the decision to settle, Reis’s management and Board considered, among other factors: (1) the amount of the settlement versus the potential for an ultimately greater judgment after appeal, including additional costs and post-judgment interest; (2) the benefits of the clarity of settling the case at this time versus continuing uncertainty; and (3) the strong cash flow generation of Reis Services’s core business. As a result of the settlement, in the second quarter of 2012 the Company reversed $1,956,000 of the previously recorded charge, resulting in the net litigation charge for the year ended December 31, 2012 of approximately $12,260,000. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company had litigation recoveries of $26,000, $80,000 and $713,000, respectively, from insurance companies and other responsible parties.

In connection with the development of Gold Peak, the Company purchased a commercial general liability “WRAP” insurance policy from a predecessor of ACE Westchester (“ACE”) covering the Company (including its subsidiaries) and its former officers, Tri-Star and Tri-Star’s subcontractors. The Company took the position that a total of $9,000,000 (and possibly $12,000,000) of coverage was available for this claim. ACE took the position that only $3,000,000 of coverage (including defense costs) was provided. The Company filed suit against ACE in District Court in Douglas County, Colorado on January 18, 2012, alleging failure to cover this claim, bad faith and other related causes of action. In particular, the Gold Peak litigation could have been settled for $12,000,000 or less prior to the trial. On November 20, 2014, the Colorado District Court determined that the WRAP policy provided $3,000,000 of coverage (including defense costs). The Company is currently evaluating its appeal rights regarding such ruling. The Company continues to take the position that ACE is liable for all damages stemming from its failure to engage and settle.

Additionally, the Company made claims against other additional insurance companies under policies maintained by the Company, including Reis’s directors’ and officers’ insurance policy, and against Reis’s former insurance broker. On November 20, 2014, the Colorado District Court determined that the directors’ and officers’ insurance policy had no obligation to the Company for the asserted claims. A motion for summary judgment by the insurance broker was denied at that time by the Colorado District Court. Trial in this comprehensive insurance action, including ACE and the insurance broker, is scheduled for July 2015.

The Company has also brought separate claims against Tri-Star, the subcontractors, the architect and a third party inspector engaged at Gold Peak, relating to those parties’ actions on the project. A trial for these actions is scheduled for October 2015.

Reis continues to consider its options with respect to contribution or other actions against other third parties and/or co-defendants in the lawsuit, and will pursue all reasonable efforts to mitigate the effects of the 2012 settlement. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in any of its recovery efforts.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

The Company is not a party to any other litigation that could reasonably be foreseen to be material to the Company.

Other Operating Commitments

TheAt December 31, 2017, the Company is a tenant under three operating leases two of which are for office spacespace; the Company’s corporate headquarters in Midtown Manhattan, New York and expire(which expires in September 2016, and a thirdOctober 2025); for office spaceoperation teams in White Plains, New York which(which expires in September 2019.June 2023) and a sales office in Laguna Beach, California (which expires in June 2020). Rent expense was approximately $2,082,000, $1,893,000$3,706,000, $3,889,000 and $1,793,000$2,207,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively, which includes base rent plus other charges including, but not limited to, real estate taxes and maintenance costs in excess of base year amounts. In connection with one lease,The 2016 amount also includes the Company providedeffect of overlapping leases which created a letterduplication of credit through a bank,rent and other occupancy costs from June 1, 2016 to the lessor. The letter of credit requirement is approximately $212,000 which is collateralized by a certificate of deposit issued by that bank. The certificate of deposit is included in restricted cash and investments in the consolidated balance sheets at DecemberOctober 31, 2014 and 2013 (see Note 4).2016.

Future minimum lease payments under operating leases at December 31, 20142017 are as follows:

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

  Amount   Amount 

2015

  $          1,896,000      

2016

   1,495,000      

2017

   214,000      

2018

   219,000        $3,422,000   

2019

   166,000         3,443,000   

2020

   3,441,000   

2021

   3,559,000   

2022

   3,652,000   

Thereafter

   8,083,000   
  

 

   

 

 

Total

$3,990,000        $    25,600,000   
  

 

   

 

 

The Company has a defined contribution savings plans pursuant to Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches contributions up to 2% of employees’ salaries, as then defined, for 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 20122015 (calculated as 50% of the employee’s contribution, capped at 4% of the employee’s salary). The Company made contributions to this plan of approximately $231,000, $203,000$306,000, $289,000 and $159,000$259,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

 

11.

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

At December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Company’s financial instruments included receivables, payables, accrued expenses, other liabilities and debt. The fair values of these financial instruments excluding debt, were not materially different from their recorded values at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016. The Company had no debt outstanding at December 31, 2014 or 2013.2017 and 2016. See Note 65 for additional information about the Company’s debt.

REIS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Continued)

12.

11. Summarized Consolidated Quarterly Information (Unaudited)

Summarized consolidated and condensed quarterly financial information is as follows:

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) 
   2014 
   For the Three Months
Ended March 31
   For the Three Months
Ended June 30
   For the Three Months
Ended September 30
   For the Three Months
Ended December 31
 

Subscription revenue

  $9,946      $10,194      $10,469      $10,726      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

  $1,047      $915      $1,130      $1,524      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $669      $822      $1,080      $1,476      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Per share amounts – basic (A):

        

Income from continuing operations

  $0.10      $0.08      $0.10      $0.14      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $0.06      $0.07      $0.10      $0.13      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Per share amounts – diluted (A):

        

Income from continuing operations

  $0.09      $0.08      $0.10      $0.12      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $0.06      $0.07      $0.09      $0.11      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

        

Basic

   10,979       11,102       11,119       11,145      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   11,463       11,531       11,653       11,688      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2013 
   For the Three Months
Ended March 31
   For the Three Months
Ended June 30
   For the Three Months
Ended September 30
   For the Three Months
Ended December 31
 

Subscription revenue

  $8,234      $8,498      $8,780      $9,209      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations (B)

  $402      $522      $705      $16,304      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (B)

  $250      $484      $649      $16,214      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Per share amounts – basic (A):

        

Income from continuing operations

  $0.04      $0.05      $0.06      $1.49      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $0.02      $0.04      $0.06      $1.49      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Per share amounts – diluted (A):

        

Income from continuing operations

  $0.04      $0.05      $0.05      $1.42      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $0.02      $0.04      $0.05      $1.41      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

        

Basic

   10,828       10,892       10,908       10,909      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   11,348       11,398       11,445       11,464      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

                

  2017 
  For the Three Months
Ended March 31
  For the Three Months
Ended June 30
  For the Three Months
Ended September 30
  For the Three Months
Ended December 31
 

Total revenue

 $12,126    $11,709    $12,092    $12,263     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $535    $397    $458    $(4,548)     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per share amounts – basic (A):

    

Net income (loss)

 $0.05    $0.03    $0.04    $(0.40)     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per share amounts – diluted (A):

    

Net income (loss)

 $0.05    $0.03    $0.04    $(0.40)     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

  11,447     11,514     11,500     11,468     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

  11,776     11,777     11,775     11,468     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  2016 
  For the Three Months
Ended March 31
  For the Three Months
Ended June 30
  For the Three Months
Ended September 30
  For the Three Months
Ended December 31
 

Total revenue

 $12,824    $11,615    $11,537    $11,554     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 $1,604    $941    $466    $(230)     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per share amounts – basic (A):

    

Net income (loss)

 $0.14    $0.08    $0.04    $(0.02)     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Per share amounts – diluted (A):

    

Net income (loss)

 $0.14    $0.08    $0.04    $(0.02)     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

  11,284     11,322     11,321     11,294     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

  11,726     11,781     11,764     11,294     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

(A)

Aggregate quarterly per share amounts may not equal annual or period to date amounts presented elsewhere in these consolidated financial statements due to rounding differences.

(B)

The fourth quarter of 2013 amounts reflect a net tax benefit of $14,751. See Note 7 for additional information.

 

F-28F-25