UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

2017

OR

¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to            

Commission File No. 000-54899

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE,

TCG BDC, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland 80-0789789

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

520 Madison Avenue, 38th40th Floor, New York, NY 10022

(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

(212) 813-4900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per shareThe NASDAQ Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

(Title of Class)

None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨x  Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As

The aggregate market value of December 31, 2015, there was no established public market for the registrant’s common stock.

Indicatestock at June 30, 2017, based on the closing price of the common stock on that date of $18.01 on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, held by those persons deemed by the registrant to be non-affiliates was approximately $1,059,269,766.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes ofregistrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class

Outstanding at March 11, 2016

Common stock, $0.01 par value

33,343,149

$0.01 par value per share, outstanding at February 27, 2018 was 62,568,651.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.


CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

INDEX

Part I

Item 1.

Business2

Item 1A.

Risk Factors21

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments49

Item 2.

Properties49

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings49

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures49

Part II

 ��

Item 5.

Marketfor Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

50

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data51

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations53

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk74

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data76

Item 9.

Changes and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure123

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures123

Item 9B.

Other Information124

Part III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance125

Item 11.

Executive Compensation125

Item 12.

SecurityOwnership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

125

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence125

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services125

Part IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules126


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We have included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, and from time to time our management may make, “forward-looking statements”. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but instead relate to future events or the future performance or financial condition of Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “GMS Finance,” or the “Company”). These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about us, our current or prospective portfolio investments, our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference herein involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including statements concerning:

our, or our portfolio companies’, future business, operations, operating results or prospects;

the return or impact of current and future investments;

the impact of a protracted decline in the liquidity of credit markets on our business;Explanatory Note

the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on our business;

the impact of changes in laws or regulations (including the interpretation thereof) governing our operations or the operations of our portfolio companies;

the valuation of our investments in portfolio companies, particularly those having no liquid trading market;

our ability to recover unrealized losses;

market conditions and our ability to access alternative debt markets and additional debt and equity capital;

our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest;

the financial condition of and ability of our current and prospective portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;

our expected financings and investments;

the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;

the timing, form and amount of any dividend distributions;

the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies;

the ability of our investment adviser to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments; and

our intent to be treated as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

We use words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “will,” “should,” “may” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. Our actual results and condition could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

We have based the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K on information available to us on the date of this Form 10-K, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we have filed or in the future may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our annual reportsThis Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

PART I

In this annual report, except where the context suggests otherwise:

the terms “we,” “us,” “our,”10-K/A (“Amendment No. 1”) amends TCG BDC, Inc.’s (the “Company” and “Carlyle GMS Finance” refer to Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc.;

the term “2015-1 Issuer” refers to Carlyle GMS Finance MM CLO 2015-1 LLC, our wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary;

the term “Borrower Sub” refers to Carlyle GMS Finance SPV LLC, our wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary;

the term “Carlyle” refers to The Carlyle Group L.P., its affiliates and its consolidated subsidiaries, a global alternative asset manager publicly traded on NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CG”. Refer to the sec.gov website for further information on Carlyle;

the terms “CGMSFA” and “Administrator” refer to Carlyle GMS Finance Administration L.L.C., our administrator;

the terms “CGMSIM,” “Adviser” and “Investment Adviser” refer to Carlyle GMS Investment Management L.L.C., our investment adviser; and

references to “this Form 10-K” are to our) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2017, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2018 (the “Original Filing” and the “Original Filing Date”).


This Amendment No. 1 is being filed solely to: i) include the phrase “including the consolidated schedules of investments” inadvertently omitted by Ernst & Young LLP from, and to update for certain other typographical items in, the first paragraph of its “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the second paragraph of its “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” regarding internal control over financial reporting” of the Company in Part II, Item 8 of the Original Filing, and ii) include the sentence “our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 by correspondence with the custodian and debt agents” inadvertently omitted by Ernst & Young LLP from the last paragraph of its “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Pursuant to Rule 12b-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we have included the entire text of Part II, Items 8 and 9A in this Amendment No. 1.

The changes to add the phrases to the filed copies of the reports of Ernst & Young LLP do not affect Ernst & Young LLP’s unqualified opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Original Filing and Amendment No. 1 or on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.

Item 15 has been included herein to reflect new Section 302 and Section 906 certifications. Except as noted above, no changes were made to the Original Filing. This amendment speaks as of the Original Filing Date, and does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the Original Filing Date.


PART II
Item 1. Business

8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

TCG BDC, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
TCG BDC, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of TCG BDC, Inc. (the “Company”), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations, changes in its net assets and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 by correspondence with the custodian and debt agents. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2012.

New York, NY
February 27, 2018


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
TCG BDC, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the TCG BDC, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, TCG BDC, Inc. (the “Company”) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of the Company, including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, NY
February 27, 2018


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 December 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
ASSETS   
Investments, at fair value   
Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated, at fair value (amortized cost of $1,782,488 and $1,332,596, respectively)$1,779,584
 $1,323,102
Investments—non-controlled/affiliated, at fair value (amortized cost of $16,273 and $0, respectively)15,431
 
Investments—controlled/affiliated, at fair value (amortized cost of $172,251 and $97,385, respectively)172,516
 99,657
Total investments, at fair value (amortized cost of $1,971,012 and $1,429,981, respectively)1,967,531
 1,422,759
Cash and cash equivalents32,039
 38,489
Receivable for investment sold7,022
 19,750
Deferred financing costs3,626
 3,308
Interest receivable from non-controlled/non-affiliated investments5,066
 3,407
Interest receivable from non-controlled/affiliated investments42
 
Interest and dividend receivable from controlled/affiliated investments5,981
 2,400
Prepaid expenses and other assets76
 42
Total assets$2,021,383
 $1,490,155
LIABILITIES   
Secured borrowings (Note 6)$562,893
 $421,885
2015-1 Notes payable, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $1,947 and $2,151, respectively (Note 7)271,053
 270,849
Payable for investments purchased9,469
 
Due to Investment Adviser69
 215
Interest and credit facility fees payable (Notes 6 and 7)5,353
 3,599
Base management and incentive fees payable (Note 4)13,098
 8,157
Dividend payable (Note 9)30,481
 20,018
Administrative service fees payable (Note 4)95
 137
Other accrued expenses and liabilities1,568
 1,158
Total liabilities894,079
 726,018
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 8 and 11)   
NET ASSETS   
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 62,207,603 shares and 41,702,318 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding622
 417
Paid-in capital in excess of par value1,172,807
 799,580
Offering costs(1,618) (74)
Accumulated net investment income (loss), net of cumulative dividends of $222,254 and $129,065, respectively2,522
 (3,207)
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)(43,548) (25,357)
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)(3,481) (7,222)
Total net assets$1,127,304
 $764,137
NET ASSETS PER SHARE$18.12
 $18.32

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 For the years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Investment income:     
From non-controlled/non-affiliated investments:     
Interest income$133,807
 $101,196
 $68,356
Other income10,526
 6,635
 834
Total investment income from non-controlled/non-affiliated investments144,333
 107,831
 69,190
From non-controlled/affiliated investments:     
Interest income1,215
 
 
Total investment income from non-controlled/affiliated investments1,215
 
 
From controlled/affiliated investments:     
Interest income10,753
 1,465
 
Dividend income8,700
 1,675
 
Total investment income from controlled/affiliated investments19,453
 3,140
 
Total investment income165,001
 110,971
 69,190
Expenses:     
Base management fees (Note 4)25,254
 18,539
 13,361
Incentive fees (Note 4)21,084
 14,905
 8,881
Professional fees2,895
 2,103
 1,845
Administrative service fees (Note 4)661
 703
 595
Interest expense (Notes 6 and 7)24,510
 16,462
 9,582
Credit facility fees (Note 6)1,983
 2,573
 1,898
Directors’ fees and expenses443
 553
 419
Other general and administrative1,683
 1,616
 1,539
Total expenses78,513
 57,454
 38,120
Waiver of base management fees (Note 4)5,927
 6,180
 4,454
Net expenses72,586
 51,274
 33,666
Net investment income (loss) before taxes92,415
 59,697
 35,524
Excise tax expense264
 76
 
Net investment income (loss)92,151
 59,621
 35,524
Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:     
Net realized gain (loss) from:     
Non-controlled/non-affiliated investments(11,692) (9,644) 1,164
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation):     
Non-controlled/non-affiliated investments6,590
 17,560
 (18,015)
Non-controlled/affiliated investments(842) 
 
Controlled/affiliated investments(2,007) 2,272
 
Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments(7,951) 10,188
 (16,851)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations$84,200
 $69,809
 $18,673
Basic and diluted earnings per common share (Note 9)$1.59
 $1.93
 $0.75
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding—Basic and Diluted (Note 9)52,997,450
 36,152,390
 24,830,200
Dividends declared per common share (Note 9)$1.64
 $1.68
 $1.74

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(dollar amounts in thousands)

 For the years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations:     
Net investment income (loss)$92,151
 $59,621
 $35,524
Net realized gain (loss) on investments(11,692) (9,644) 1,164
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments3,741
 19,832
 (18,015)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations84,200
 69,809
 18,673
Capital transactions:     
Common stock issued, net of offering and underwriting costs365,475
 185,537
 262,354
Reinvestment of dividends6,681
 279
 131
Dividends declared (Note 12)(93,189) (63,214) (47,689)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions278,967
 122,602
 214,796
Net increase (decrease) in net assets363,167
 192,411
 233,469
Net assets at beginning of year764,137
 571,726
 338,257
Net assets at end of year$1,127,304
 $764,137
 $571,726

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollar amounts in thousands)

 For the years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations$84,200
 $69,809
 $18,673
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:     
Amortization of deferred financing costs949
 1,417
 1,051
Net accretion of discount on investments(11,747) (5,605) (3,035)
Paid-in-kind interest(1,057) 
 
Net realized (gain) loss on investments11,692
 9,644
 (1,164)
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments(3,741) (19,832) 18,015
Cost of investments purchased and change in payable for investments purchased(1,280,124) (755,654) (653,154)
Proceeds from sales and repayments of investments and change in receivable for investments sold812,576
 383,591
 228,004
Changes in operating assets:     
Interest receivable(3,767) (1,203) 1,233
Dividend receivable(1,515) (1,325) 
Prepaid expenses and other assets(34) 344
 (229)
Changes in operating liabilities:     
Due to Investment Adviser(146) 26
 148
Interest and credit facility fees payable1,754
 1,022
 1,384
Base management and incentive fees payable4,941
 2,880
 (1,042)
Administrative service fees payable(42) 40
 6
Other accrued expenses and liabilities410
 233
 165
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(385,651) (314,613) (389,945)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering and underwriting costs357,429
 185,537
 262,354
Borrowings on SPV Credit Facility and Credit Facility816,216
 566,351
 402,200
Repayments of SPV Credit Facility and Credit Facility(675,208) (378,779) (476,328)
Repayments of debt assumed from NFIC Acquisition(42,128) 
 
Proceeds from issuance of 2015-1 Notes
 
 273,000
Debt issuance costs paid(1,063) (643) (2,648)
Dividends paid in cash(76,045) (61,201) (35,550)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities379,201
 311,265
 423,028
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(6,450) (3,348) 33,083
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year38,489
 41,837
 8,754
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$32,039
 $38,489
 $41,837
Supplemental disclosures:     
Offering expenses and debt issuance costs due$
 $
 $1
Interest paid during the year$22,519
 $15,267
 $8,083
Taxes, including excise tax, paid during year$179
 $79
 $50
Dividends declared during the year$93,189
 $63,214
 $47,689
Reinvestment of dividends$6,681
 $279
 $131
Cost of investments received in the NFIC Acquisition from shares issued (Note 13)$(8,046) $
 $
Shares issued in consideration of NFIC Acquisition (Note 13)$8,046
 $
 $
Debt assumed from NFIC Acquisition (Note 13)$42,128
 $
 $
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
As of December 31, 2017
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1)
Industry 
Interest Rate (2)
 Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount 
Amortized Cost (6)
 
Fair Value(7)
 Percentage of Net Assets
First Lien Debt (77.04%)             
Access CIG, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Business Services L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/17/2021 $18,149
 $18,054
 $18,263
 1.62%
Achilles Acquisition LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 6/6/2023 40,910
 39,931
 40,523
 3.59
Advanced Instruments, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 10/31/2022 10,421
 10,227
 10,421
 0.92
Alpha Packaging Holdings, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/12/2020 2,896
 2,894
 2,896
 0.26
AMS Group HoldCo, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Transportation: Cargo L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 9/29/2023 29,925
 29,254
 29,925
 2.65
Anaren, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Telecommunications L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 2/18/2021 3,802
 3,789
 3,809
 0.34
Audax AAMP Holdings, Inc. (2)(3)(5)
Durable Consumer Goods L + 7.50% (1.00% Floor) 1/31/2018 12,487
 12,459
 12,362
 1.10
BeyondTrust Software, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Software L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 11/21/2023 17,000
 16,758
 16,910
 1.50
Brooks Equipment Company, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Construction & Building L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/29/2020 2,546
 2,535
 2,546
 0.23
Capstone Logistics Acquisition, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Transportation: Cargo L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/7/2021 19,198
 19,081
 18,895
 1.68
Captive Resources Midco, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/18/2021 30,900
 30,635
 30,783
 2.73
Central Security Group, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Consumer Services L + 5.63% (1.00% Floor) 10/6/2021 39,007
 38,668
 38,941
 3.45
CIP Revolution Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/19/2021 19,048
 18,917
 18,993
 1.68
Colony Hardware Corporation (2)(3)(4)(13)
Construction & Building L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/23/2021 22,071
 21,838
 22,049
 1.96
Continuum Managed Services Holdco, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
High Tech Industries L + 8.75% (1.00% Floor) 6/8/2023 22,885
 22,208
 23,237
 2.06
Dade Paper & Bag, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(16)
Forest Products & Paper L + 7.50% (1.00% Floor) 6/10/2024 49,750
 48,822
 49,884
 4.42
Datto, Inc. (2)(3)(5)(15)(16)
High Tech Industries L + 8.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/7/2022 35,622
 35,082
 35,818
 3.18
Dent Wizard International Corporation (2)(3)(4)(16)
Automotive L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 4/7/2020 895
 893
 894
 0.08
Derm Growth Partners III, LLC (Dermatology Associates) (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 5/31/2022 50,658
 50,104
 50,441
 4.47
DermaRite Industries, LLC (2)(3)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 7.00% (1.00% Floor) 3/3/2022 20,003
 19,729
 19,850
 1.76
Dimensional Dental Management, LLC (2)(3)(5)(12)(15)(16)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 2/12/2021 33,674
 33,038
 33,514
 2.97
Direct Travel, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 12/1/2021 29,623
 29,136
 29,708
 2.64
EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (2)(3)(5)(12)(13)(16)
Telecommunications L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/7/2021 27,284
 26,618
 26,738
 2.37
Emergency Communications Network, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(16)
Telecommunications L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/1/2023 24,875
 24,669
 24,850
 2.20


Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1)
Industry 
Interest Rate (2)
 Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount 
Amortized Cost (6)
 
Fair Value(7)
 Percentage of Net Assets
First Lien Debt (77.04%) (continued)             
EP Minerals, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Metals & Mining L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 8/20/2020 $7,920
 $7,901
 $7,931
 0.70%
FCX Holdings Corp. (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Capital Equipment L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 8/4/2020 3,820
 3,823
 3,824
 0.34
Frontline Technologies Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(5)(15)
Software L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 9/18/2023 39,197
 38,757
 39,159
 3.47
FWR Holding Corporation (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Beverage, Food & Tobacco L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/21/2023 36,692
 35,525
 36,098
 3.20
Global Franchise Group, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Beverage, Food & Tobacco L + 5.75% (1.00% Floor) 12/18/2019 14,468
 14,345
 14,468
 1.28
Global Software, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
High Tech Industries L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/2/2022 20,800
 20,501
 20,774
 1.84
Green Energy Partners/Stonewall LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)
Energy: Electricity L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 11/13/2021 19,950
 19,621
 19,334
 1.71
Hummel Station LLC (2)(3)(5)(13)(16)
Energy: Electricity L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/27/2022 15,000
 14,375
 13,905
 1.23
Hydrofarm, LLC (2)(5)(13)(16)
Wholesale L + 7.00% 5/12/2022 18,763
 18,640
 18,241
 1.62
Indra Holdings Corp. (Totes Isotoner) (2)(3)(5)(13)
Non-durable Consumer Goods L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/1/2021 18,965
 17,224
 11,222
 1.00
Legacy.com Inc. (2)(3)(5)(12)
High Tech Industries L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 3/20/2023 17,000
 16,653
 17,558
 1.56
Metrogistics LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Transportation: Cargo L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 9/30/2022 17,978
 17,774
 17,921
 1.59
Moxie Liberty LLC (2)(3)(5)(13)
Energy: Electricity L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 8/21/2020 9,975
 9,008
 9,148
 0.81
National Technical Systems, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Aerospace & Defense L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/12/2021 26,351
 26,072
 24,817
 2.20
NES Global Talent Finance US LLC (United Kingdom) (2)(3)(4)(8)(13)
Energy: Oil & Gas L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/3/2019 13,600
 13,439
 13,369
 1.19
NMI AcquisitionCo, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(15)
High Tech Industries L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/6/2022 51,091
 50,112
 50,944
 4.52
OnCourse Learning Corporation (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Consumer Services L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 9/12/2021 35,905
 35,513
 35,740
 3.17
Payment Alliance International, Inc. (2)(3)(5)(12)(16)
Business Services L + 6.05% (1.00% Floor) 9/15/2021 26,544
 25,983
 26,464
 2.35
Pelican Products, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 4/11/2020 3,585
 3,589
 3,581
 0.32
Plano Molding Company, LLC(2)(3)(4)(5)(16)
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure L + 7.50% (1.00% Floor) 5/12/2021 19,523
 19,263
 16,934
 1.50
PMG Acquisition Corporation (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/22/2022 27,025
 26,649
 27,161
 2.41
PPT Management Holdings, LLC(2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/16/2022 24,750
 24,572
 23,443
 2.08
Prime Risk Partners, Inc. (2)(3)(5)(15)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 5.75% (1.00% Floor) 8/13/2023 1,639
 1,594
 1,650
 0.15
Prime Risk Partners, Inc. (2)(3)(5)(12)(15)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 5.75% (1.00% Floor) 8/13/2023 20,521
 19,959
 21,032
 1.87
Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC(2)(3)(5)(10)(12)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/9/2020 33,000
 32,270
 19,487
 1.73
Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC (2)(3)(5)(15)(16)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 6.75% (3.25% Floor) 3/31/2019 2,729
 2,729
 2,729
 0.24


Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1)
Industry 
Interest Rate (2)
 Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount 
Amortized Cost (6)
 
Fair Value(7)
 Percentage of Net Assets
First Lien Debt (77.04%) (continued)             
Prowler Acquisition Corp. (Pipeline Supply and Service, LLC) (2)(3)(4)(13)
Wholesale L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 1/28/2020 $14,910
 $14,285
 $14,133
 1.25%
QW Holding Corporation (Quala) (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Environmental Industries L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 8/31/2022 36,549
 35,772
 35,715
 3.17
Reliant Pro Rehab, LLC (2)(3)(5)(12)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 10.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/28/2018 24,563
 24,544
 24,563
 2.18
Smile Doctors, LLC (2)(3)(5)(13)(15)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.75% (1.00% Floor) 10/6/2022 9,059
 8,930
 9,011
 0.80
SolAero Technologies Corp.(2)(3)(4)(5)(16)
Telecommunications L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 12/10/2020 24,828
 24,221
 23,416
 2.08
Superior Health Linens, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Business Services L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 9/30/2021 21,061
 20,788
 21,026
 1.87
Surgical Information Systems, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(12)(13)(16)
High Tech Industries L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 4/24/2023 30,000
 29,728
 30,075
 2.67
T2 Systems Canada, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(16)
Transportation: Consumer L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/28/2022 4,009
 3,926
 3,950
 0.35
T2 Systems, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Transportation: Consumer L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/28/2022 32,649
 31,956
 32,146
 2.85
The Hilb Group, LLC (2)(3)(5)(12)(15)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 6/24/2021 38,622
 38,132
 38,204
 3.39
The SI Organization, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Aerospace & Defense L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 11/23/2019 14,300
 14,310
 14,419
 1.28
The Topps Company, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Non-durable Consumer Goods L + 6.00% (1.25% Floor) 10/2/2020 23,130
 22,970
 22,991
 2.04
TruckPro, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Automotive L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/6/2018 8,860
 8,850
 8,831
 0.78
Tweddle Group, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/24/2022 7,356
 7,266
 7,264
 0.64
Vetcor Professional Practices, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Consumer Services L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 4/20/2021 38,868
 38,502
 38,725
 3.43
Vistage Worldwide, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Business Services L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 8/19/2021 32,916
 32,753
 32,916
 2.92
VRC Companies, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Business Services L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 3/31/2023 38,600
 37,873
 38,541
 3.42
W/S Packaging Group Inc. (2)(3)(4)(16)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/9/2019 4,004
 3,887
 3,789
 0.34
Watchfire Enterprises, Inc. (2)(3)(13)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 10/2/2020 1,362
 1,351
 1,362
 0.12
Winchester Electronics Corporation (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Capital Equipment L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 6/30/2022 36,547
 36,292
 36,933
 3.28
Zenith Merger Sub, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Business Services L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 12/12/2023 15,290
 15,069
 15,198
 1.35
Zest Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Durable Consumer Goods L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 8/16/2023 3,431
 3,423
 3,453
 0.31
First Lien Debt Total        $1,526,058
 $1,515,845
 134.46%
              
Second Lien Debt (12.51%)             
AIM Group USA Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Aerospace & Defense L + 9.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/2/2022 $23,000
 $22,737
 $23,230
 2.06%
AmeriLife Group, LLC (2)(3)(5)(13)(16)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 8.75% (1.00% Floor) 1/10/2023 22,000
 21,647
 21,817
 1.94


Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1)
Industry 
Interest Rate (2)
 Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount 
Amortized Cost (6)
 
Fair Value(7)
 Percentage of Net Assets
Second Lien Debt (12.51%) (continued)            
Argon Medical Devices, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(5)(16)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 9.50% (1.00% Floor) 6/23/2022 $25,000
 $24,447
 $25,000
 2.22%
Argon Medical Devices Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(5)(16)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 8.00% (1.00% Floor) 1/23/2026 7,500
 7,465
 7,515
 0.67
Berlin Packaging L.L.C. (2)(3)(13)(16)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 10/1/2022 1,146
 1,140
 1,153
 0.10
Confie Seguros Holding II Co.(2)(3)(5)(13)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 9.50% (1.25% Floor) 5/8/2019 9,000
 8,959
 8,715
 0.77
Drew Marine Group Inc.(2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(16)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 7.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/19/2021 12,500
 12,484
 12,456
 1.10
Genex Holdings, Inc. (2)(3)(5)(16)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 7.75% (1.00% Floor) 5/30/2022 8,990
 8,915
 8,924
 0.79
Paradigm Acquisition Corp. (2)(3)(5)(17)
Business Services L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/12/2025 9,600
 9,507
 9,584
 0.85
Pathway Partners Vet Management Company LLC (2)(3)(5)(15)(16)
Consumer Services L + 8.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/10/2025 7,751
 7,644
 7,741
 0.69
Pexco LLC (2)(3)(5)(16)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 8.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/8/2025 20,000
 19,818
 20,362
 1.81
Prowler Acquisition Corp. (Pipeline Supply and Service, LLC) (2)(3)(5)
Wholesale L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 7/28/2020 3,000
 2,967
 2,485
 0.22
Q International Courier, LLC (2)(3)(5)(16)
Transportation: Cargo L + 8.25% (1.00% Floor) 9/19/2025 18,750
 18,384
 18,621
 1.65
Reladyne, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Wholesale L + 9.50% (1.00% Floor) 1/21/2023 5,000
 4,884
 4,929
 0.44
Rough Country, LLC (2)(3)(5)(13)(16)
Durable Consumer Goods L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 11/25/2023 42,500
 41,311
 42,802
 3.80
Santa Cruz Holdco, Inc. (2)(3)(5)
Non-durable Consumer Goods L + 8.25% (1.00% Floor) 12/13/2024 17,138
 16,967
 17,079
 1.51
Superion, LLC (fka Ramundsen Public Sector, LLC) (2)(3)(13)
Sovereign & Public Finance L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 1/31/2025 1,800
 1,784
 1,820
 0.16
Watchfire Enterprises, Inc.(2)(3)(5)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 8.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/2/2021 7,000
 6,941
 7,000
 0.62
Zywave, Inc. (2)(3)(5)
High Tech Industries L + 9.00% (1.00% Floor) 11/17/2023 4,950
 4,886
 5,000
 0.44
Second Lien Debt Total        $242,887
 $246,233
 21.84%







TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2017
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1)
Industry Shares/ Units Cost 
Fair Value(7)
 Percentage of Net Assets
Equity Investments (0.89%) (5)
         
CIP Revolution Holdings, LLCMedia: Advertising, Printing & Publishing 30,000
 $300
 $369
 0.03%
Dade Paper & Bag, LLCForest Products & Paper 1,500,000
 1,500
 2,140
 0.19
DecoPac, Inc.Non-durable Consumer Goods 1,500,000
 1,500
 1,500
 0.13
Derm Growth Partners III, LLC (Dermatology Associates)Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals 1,000,000
 1,000
 1,796
 0.16
GS Holdco LLC (Global Software, LLC)High Tech Industries 1,000,000
 1,001
 1,550
 0.14
Legacy.com Inc.High Tech Industries 1,500,000
 1,500
 1,739
 0.15
Power Stop Intermediate Holdings, LLCAutomotive 7,150
 369
 1,191
 0.11
Rough Country, LLCDurable Consumer Goods 754,775
 755
 873
 0.08
T2 Systems Parent CorporationTransportation: Consumer 555,556
 556
 499
 0.04
Tailwind HMT Holdings Corp.Energy: Oil & Gas 2,000,000
 2,000
 2,000
 0.18
THG Acquisition, LLC (The Hilb Group, LLC)Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1,500,000
 1,500
 2,287
 0.20
Zenith American Holding, Inc.Business Services 1,561,644
 1,562
 1,562
 0.14
Equity Investments Total    $13,543
 $17,506
 1.55%
Total investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated    $1,782,488
 $1,779,584
 157.85%
Investments—non-controlled/affiliated (5)(18)
Industry 
Interest Rate (2)
 Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount 
Amortized Cost (6)
 
Fair Value(7)
 Percentage of Net Assets
First Lien Debt (0.78%)             
TwentyEighty, Inc. - Revolver (2)(3)(15)
Business Services L + 8.00% (1.00% Floor) 3/21/2020 $
 $(6) $(20) %
TwentyEighty, Inc. - (Term A Loans) (2)(3)
Business Services L + 3.50% (1.00% Floor), cash, 4.50% PIK 3/21/2020 3,890
 3,871
 3,760
 0.33
TwentyEighty, Inc. - (Term B Loans)Business Services 1.00% cash, 7.00% PIK 3/21/2020 6,715
 6,494
 6,360
 0.57
TwentyEighty, Inc. - (Term C Loans)Business Services 0.25% cash, 8.75% PIK 3/21/2020 6,521
 5,914
 5,331
 0.47
First Lien Debt Total        $16,273
 $15,431
 1.37%
Investments—non-controlled/affiliated (5)(18)
Industry Shares/Units Cost 
Fair Value(7)
 
Percentage of
Net Assets
Equity Investments (0.00%)         
TwentyEighty Investors LLCBusiness Services 69,786
 $
 $
 %
Equity Investments Total    $
 $
 %
Total Investments - non-controlled/affiliated    $16,273
 $15,431
 1.37%
Investments—controlled/affiliatedIndustry 
Interest Rate(2)
 Maturity Date Par Amount/ LLC Interest Cost 
Fair Value(7)
 Percentage of Net Assets
Investment Fund (8.77%) (8)
             
Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC, Mezzanine Loan (2)(5)(9)(11)
Investment Fund L + 9.00% 6/22/2018 $85,750
 $85,750
 $85,750
 7.61%
Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC, Subordinated Loan and Member’s Interest (5)(11)
Investment Fund 0.001% 3/1/2021 86,501
 86,501
 86,766
 7.7
Investment Fund Total        $172,251
 $172,516
 15.31%
Total investments—controlled/affiliated        $172,251
 $172,516
 15.31%
Total investments        $1,971,012
 $1,967,531
 174.53%


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2017
(dollar amounts in thousands)

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, issuers of debt and equity investments held by TCG BDC, Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “we,” “us,” “our,” “TCG BDC” or the “Company”) are domiciled in the United States and issuers of structured finance obligations are domiciled in the Cayman Islands. Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the “Investment Company Act”), the Company would be deemed to “control” a portfolio company if the Company owned more than 25% of its outstanding voting securities and/or held the power to exercise control over the management or policies of the portfolio company. As of December 31, 2017, the Company does not “control” any of these portfolio companies. Under the Investment Company Act, the Company would be deemed an “affiliated person” of a portfolio company if the Company owns 5% or more of the portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities. As of December 31, 2017, the Company is not an “affiliated person” of any of these portfolio companies.
(2)Variable rate loans to the portfolio companies bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to either LIBOR (“L”) or an alternate base rate (commonly based on the Federal Funds Rate or the U.S. Prime Rate), which generally resets quarterly. For each such loan, the Company has provided the interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, all of our LIBOR loans were indexed to the 90-day LIBOR rate at 1.69%, except for those loans as indicated in Notes 16 and 17 below.
(3)Loan includes interest rate floor feature.
(4)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, TCG BDC SPV LLC (the “SPV”). The SPV has entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “SPV Credit Facility”). The lenders of the SPV Credit Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the assets of the SPV (see Note 6, Borrowings). Accordingly, such assets are not available to creditors of the Company or Carlyle GMS Finance MM CLO 2015-1 LLC (the “2015-1 Issuer”).
(5)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the Company. The Company has entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Facility” and, together with the SPV Credit Facility, the “Facilities”). The lenders of the Credit Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the portfolio investments held by the Company (see Note 6, Borrowings). Accordingly, such assets are not available to creditors of the SPV or the 2015-1 Issuer.
(6)Amortized cost represents original cost, including origination fees and upfront fees received that are deemed to be an adjustment to yield, adjusted for the accretion/amortization of discounts/premiums, as applicable, on debt investments using the effective interest method.
(7)Fair value is determined in good faith by or under the direction of the Board of Directors of the Company (see Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 3, Fair Value Measurements), pursuant to the Company’s valuation policy. The fair value of all first lien and second lien debt investments, equity investments and the investment fund mezzanine loan was determined using significant unobservable inputs.
(8)The Company has determined the indicated investments are non-qualifying assets under Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act. Under the Investment Company Act, the Company may not acquire any non-qualifying assets unless, at the time such acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the Company’s total assets.
(9)Represents a corporate mezzanine loan, which is subordinated to senior secured term loans of the portfolio company/investment fund.
(10)Loan was on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2017.
(11)Under the Investment Company Act, the Company is deemed to be an “affiliated person” of and “control” this investment fund because the Company owns more than 25% of the investment fund’s outstanding voting securities and/or has the power to exercise control over management or policies of such investment fund. See Note 5, Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC, for more details.
(12)In addition to the interest earned based on the stated interest rate of this loan, which is the amount reflected in this schedule, the Company is entitled to receive additional interest as a result of an agreement among lenders as follows: Dimensional Dental Management, LLC (4.58%), EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (3.97%), Legacy.com Inc. (4.11%), Payment Alliance International, Inc. (2.70%), Prime Risk Partners, Inc. (3.32%), Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC (3.54%), Reliant Pro Rehab (nil), Surgical Information Systems, LLC (1.01%) and The Hilb Group, LLC (3.38%). Pursuant to the agreement among lenders in respect of this loan, this investment represents a first lien/last out loan, which has a secondary priority behind the first lien/first out loan with respect to principal, interest and other payments.
(13)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the 2015-1 Issuer and secure the notes issued in connection with a $400,000 term debt securitization completed by the Company on June 26, 2015 (the “2015-1 Debt Securitization”, see Note 7, 2015-1 Notes). Accordingly, such assets are not available to the creditors of the SPV or the Company.



TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2017
(dollar amounts in thousands)

(14)As of December 31, 2017, the Company had the following unfunded commitments to fund delayed draw and revolving senior secured loans:
First and Second Lien Debt—unfunded delayed draw and revolving term loans commitmentsType Unused Fee Par/ Principal Amount Fair Value
Achilles Acquisition LLCDelayed Draw 1.00% $2,051
 $(18)
Advanced Instruments, LLCRevolver 0.50 1,167
 
AMS Group HoldCo, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00 5,491
 
AMS Group HoldCo, LLCRevolver 0.50 2,315
 
Captive Resources Midco, LLCDelayed Draw 1.25 3,571
 (11)
Captive Resources Midco, LLCRevolver 0.50 2,143
 (7)
CIP Revolution Holdings, LLCRevolver 0.50 1,331
 (5)
Continuum Managed Services HoldCo, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00 1,917
 25
Continuum Managed Services HoldCo, LLCRevolver 0.50 2,500
 32
Datto, Inc.Revolver 0.50 726
 4
DermaRite Industries LLCRevolver 0.50 3,848
 (28)
Derm Growth Partners III, LLC (Dermatology Associates)Revolver 0.50 2,420
 (10)
Dimensional Dental Management, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00 9,584
 (35)
Direct Travel, Inc.Delayed Draw 1.00 4,118
 7
Frontline Technologies Holdings, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00 7,705
 (6)
FWR Holding CorporationDelayed Draw 1.00 9,333
 (111)
FWR Holding CorporationRevolver 0.50 3,889
 (46)
Global Franchise Group, LLCRevolver 0.50 495
 
National Technical Systems, Inc.Revolver 0.50 2,500
 (161)
NMI AcquisitionCo, Inc.Revolver 0.50 1,280
 (4)
OnCourse Learning CorporationRevolver 0.50 1,324
 (6)
Pathway Partners Vet Management Company LLCDelayed Draw 1.00 3,410
 (3)
Prime Risk Partners, Inc.Delayed Draw 0.50 768
 4
Prime Risk Partners, Inc.Delayed Draw 0.50 9,562
 163
PMG Acquisition CorporationRevolver 0.50 2,356
 9
Product Quest Manufacturing, LLCRevolver 0.50 3,229
 
Smile Doctors, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00 6,345
 (26)
Smile Doctors, LLCRevolver 0.50 827
 (3)
Superior Health Linens, LLCRevolver 0.50 2,617
 (4)
T2 Systems, Inc.Revolver 0.50 1,760
 (26)
The Hilb Group, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00 3,594
 (36)
TwentyEighty, Inc. (f/k/a Miller Heiman, Inc.)Revolver 0.50 607
 (20)
Vetcor Professional Practices, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00 8,248
 (31)
VRC Companies, LLCDelayed Draw 0.75 3,294
 (8)
VRC Companies, LLCRevolver 0.50 401
 (1)
Zenith Merger Sub, Inc.Revolver 0.50 1,648
 (9)
Total unfunded commitments    $118,374
 $(371)
(16)As of December 31, 2017, this LIBOR loan was indexed to the 30-day LIBOR rate at 1.56%.
(17)As of December 31, 2017, this LIBOR loan was indexed to the 180-day LIBOR rate at 1.84%.
(18)Under the Investment Company Act, the Company is deemed an “affiliated person” of this portfolio company because the Company owns 5% or more of the portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities.


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
As of December 31, 2017
(dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31, 2017, investments at fair value consisted of the following:
Type Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value
First Lien Debt (excluding First Lien/Last Out) $1,295,406
 $1,293,641
 65.75%
First Lien/Last Out Unitranche 246,925
 237,635
 12.08
Second Lien Debt 242,887
 246,233
 12.51
Equity Investments 13,543
 17,506
 0.89
Investment Fund 172,251
 172,516
 8.77
Total $1,971,012
 $1,967,531
 100.00%
The rate type of debt investments at fair value as of December 31, 2017 was as follows:
Rate Type Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value of First and Second Lien Debt
Floating Rate $1,772,810
 $1,765,818
 99.34%
Fixed Rate 12,408
 11,691
 0.66
Total $1,785,218
 $1,777,509
 100.00%
The industry composition of investments at fair value as of December 31, 2017 was as follows:
Industry Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value
Aerospace & Defense $63,119
 $62,466
 3.17%
Automotive 10,112
 10,916
 0.55
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 171,272
 173,935
 8.84
Beverage, Food & Tobacco 49,870
 50,566
 2.57
Business Services 177,862
 178,985
 9.10
Capital Equipment 40,115
 40,757
 2.07
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber 32,302
 32,818
 1.67
Construction & Building 24,373
 24,595
 1.25
Consumer Services 120,327
 121,147
 6.16
Containers, Packaging & Glass 46,509
 33,635
 1.71
Durable Consumer Goods 57,948
 59,490
 3.02
Energy: Electricity 43,004
 42,387
 2.15
Energy: Oil & Gas 15,439
 15,369
 0.78
Environmental Industries 35,772
 35,715
 1.82
Forest Products & Paper 50,322
 52,024
 2.64
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals 230,705
 232,715
 11.83
High Tech Industries 181,671
 186,695
 9.49
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure 48,399
 46,642
 2.37
Investment Fund 172,251
 172,516
 8.77
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing 34,775
 34,988
 1.78
Metals & Mining 7,901
 7,931
 0.40
Non-durable Consumer Goods 58,661
 52,792
 2.68
Software 55,515
 56,069
 2.85
Sovereign & Public Finance 1,784
 1,820
 0.09
Telecommunications 79,297
 78,813
 4.01
Transportation: Cargo 84,493
 85,362
 4.34
Transportation: Consumer 36,438
 36,595
 1.86
Wholesale 40,776
 39,788
 2.03
Total $1,971,012
 $1,967,531
 100.00%


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2017
(dollar amounts in thousands)
The geographical composition of investments at fair value as of December 31, 2017 was as follows:
Geography Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value
United Kingdom $13,439
 $13,369
 0.68%
United States 1,957,573
 1,954,162
 99.32
Total $1,971,012
 $1,967,531
 100.00%

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
As of December 31, 2016
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1)Industry Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount Amortized Cost (6) Fair Value (7) Percentage of Net Assets
First Lien Debt (80.09%)             
Access CIG, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Business Services L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/17/2021 $18,335
 $18,222
 $18,335
 2.40%
Advanced Instruments, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 10/31/2022 22,500
 22,019
 22,252
 2.91
AF Borrower LLC (Accuvant) (2)(3)(4)
High Tech Industries L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 1/28/2022 16,113
 15,923
 16,113
 2.11
Alpha Packaging Holdings, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/12/2020 11,322
 11,313
 11,322
 1.48
Anaren, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Telecommunications L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 2/18/2021 10,869
 10,800
 10,869
 1.42
Audax AAMP Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)
Durable Consumer Goods L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 6/24/2017 10,424
 10,400
 10,348
 1.35
BAART Programs, Inc. (2)(4)(16)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 7.75% (0.00% Floor) 10/9/2021 7,406
 7,355
 7,534
 0.99
Brooks Equipment Company, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Construction & Building L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/29/2020 6,694
 6,657
 6,683
 0.87
Capstone Logistics Acquisition, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)
Transportation: Cargo L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/7/2021 19,478
 19,337
 19,212
 2.51
Captive Resources Midco,LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)(15)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 5.75% (1.00% Floor) 6/30/2020 29,050
 28,683
 29,009
 3.80
Central Security Group, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Consumer Services L + 5.63% (1.00% Floor) 10/6/2020 28,658
 28,300
 28,557
 3.74
CIP Revolution Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(5)(15)
Media: Advertising,
Printing & Publishing
 L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/19/2021 16,500
 16,325
 16,585
 2.17
Colony Hardware Corporation (2)(3)(4)(13)
Construction & Building L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/23/2021 17,038
 16,806
 17,038
 2.23
Datapipe, Inc. (2)(3)(13)(16)
Telecommunications L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 3/15/2019 9,750
 9,666
 9,764
 1.28
Dent Wizard International Corporation (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Automotive L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 4/7/2020 7,216
 7,190
 7,216
 0.94
Derm Growth Partners III, LLC (Dermatology Associates) (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 5/31/2022 32,929
 32,393
 32,958
 4.31
Dimensional Dental Management, LLC (2)(3)(5)(12)(15)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 7.00% (1.00% Floor) 2/12/2021 18,000
 17,601
 17,811
 2.33
Dimora Brands, Inc. (fka TK USA Enterprises,Inc.) (2)(3)(5)(15)
Construction & Building L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 4/4/2022 
 (60) (30) 
Direct Travel, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 12/1/2021 12,842
 12,420
 12,712
 1.66
EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (2)(3)(5)(12)
Telecommunications L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/7/2021 23,750
 23,098
 23,242
 3.04
Emerging Markets Communications, LLC (2)(3)(4)(8)(13)
Telecommunications L + 5.75% (1.00% Floor) 7/1/2021 17,730
 16,299
 17,730
 2.32
EP Minerals, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Metals & Mining L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 8/20/2020 10,264
 10,232
 10,259
 1.34
FCX Holdings Corp. (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Capital Equipment L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 8/4/2020 9,856
 9,852
 9,856
 1.29
Genex Holdings, Inc. (2)(3)(13)(16)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/30/2021 4,200
 4,187
 4,196
 0.55
Global Software, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
High Tech Industries L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 5/2/2022 16,163
 15,880
 16,163
 2.12
Green Energy Partners/Stonewall LLC (2)(3)(5)(13)
Energy: Electricity L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 11/13/2021 16,600
 16,475
 16,598
 2.17
Green Plains II LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Beverage, Food & Tobacco L + 7.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/3/2022 15,205
 15,059
 15,379
 2.01
Hummel Station LLC (2)(3)(5)(13)(16)
Energy: Electricity L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/27/2022 21,000
 20,308
 20,160
 2.64
Imagine! Print Solutions, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 3/30/2022 18,461
 18,213
 18,603
 2.43
Imperial Bag & Paper Co. LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Forest Products & Paper L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 1/7/2022 24,074
 23,752
 23,924
 3.13
Indra Holdings Corp. (Totes Isotoner) (2)(3)(5)(13)
Non-durable Consumer Goods L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/1/2021 14,224
 14,130
 10,553
 1.38
International Medical Group, Inc. (2)(3)(5)(12)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/30/2020 30,000
 29,505
 30,237
 3.96
Jackson Hewitt Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Retail L + 7.00% (1.00% Floor) 7/30/2020 8,758
 8,625
 8,320
 1.09



TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2016
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1)Industry Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount Amortized Cost (6) Fair Value (7) Percentage of Net Assets
First Lien Debt (80.09%) (continued)             
Metrogistics LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Transportation: Cargo L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 9/30/2022 $15,200
 $14,986
 $15,094
 1.98%
MSX International, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Automotive L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/21/2020 8,940
 8,882
 8,940
 1.17
National Technical Systems, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)(15)
Aerospace & Defense L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/12/2021 25,123
 24,854
 23,927
 3.13
NES Global Talent Finance US LLC (United Kingdom) (2)(3)(4)(8)(13)
Energy: Oil & Gas L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/3/2019 11,250
 11,132
 10,911
 1.43
OnCourse Learning Corporation (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Consumer Services L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 9/12/2021 26,141
 25,770
 26,220
 3.43
Paradigm Acquisition Corp. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Business Services L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 6/2/2022 23,246
 22,963
 23,223
 3.04
Pelican Products, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 4/11/2020 7,643
 7,654
 7,593
 0.99
Plano Molding Company, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure L + 7.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/12/2021 18,163
 18,030
 17,302
 2.26
PPT Management Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(5)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/16/2022 22,500
 22,288
 22,426
 2.93
Premier Senior Marketing, LLC (2)(3)(5)(16)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 7/1/2022 3,741
 3,690
 3,741
 0.49
Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(12)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 5.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/9/2020 28,000
 27,565
 25,838
 3.38
Prowler Acquisition Corp. (Pipeline Supply and Service, LLC) (2)(3)(4)
Wholesale L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 1/28/2020 10,798
 10,739
 8,101
 1.06
PSC Industrial Holdings Corp (2)(3)(4)(13)
Environmental Industries L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 12/5/2020 11,760
 11,679
 11,290
 1.48
PSI Services LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(12)(16)
Business Services L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 2/27/2021 32,705
 32,022
 34,784
 4.56
PT Intermediate Holdings III,LLC (Parts Town) (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Wholesale L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 6/23/2022 17,417
 17,215
 17,563
 2.30
QW Holding Corporation (Quala) (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Environmental Industries L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 8/31/2022 29,925
 29,084
 30,009
 3.93
Reliant Pro Rehab, LLC (2)(3)(5)(12)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 10.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/29/2017 22,331
 22,024
 22,331
 2.92
SolAero Technologies Corp.(2)(3)(4)(5)
Telecommunications L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 12/10/2020 19,677
 19,541
 18,901
 2.47
Superior Health Linens, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Business Services L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 9/30/2021 19,206
 18,891
 19,068
 2.50
T2 Systems, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)(16)
Transportation: Consumer L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/28/2022 22,950
 22,333
 23,208
 3.04
T2 Systems Canada, Inc. (2)(3)(5)(16)
Transportation: Consumer L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/28/2022 4,050
 3,952
 4,090
 0.54
Teaching Strategies, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 5.50% (0.50% Floor) 10/1/2019 13,369
 13,333
 13,369
 1.75
The Hilb Group, LLC (2)(3)(5)(12)(15)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 6/24/2021 29,682
 29,113
 29,826
 3.90
The SI Organization, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Aerospace & Defense L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 11/23/2019 8,574
 8,527
 8,676
 1.15
The Topps Company, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Non-durable Consumer Goods L + 6.00% (1.25% Floor) 10/2/2020 18,707
 18,629
 18,795
 2.46
TruckPro, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Automotive L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/6/2018 9,292
 9,267
 9,262
 1.21
Tweddle Group, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/24/2022 16,200
 15,885
 16,114
 2.11
TwentyEighty, Inc. (fka Miller Heiman, Inc.) (2)(3)(5)(10)(13)
Business Services L + 6.00% (1.00% Floor) 9/30/2019 18,719
 18,571
 7,628
 1.00
U.S. Farathane, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Automotive L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 12/23/2021 1,925
 1,895
 1,925
 0.25
U.S. TelePacific Holdings Corp.(2)(3)(5)
Telecommunications L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 2/24/2021 30,000
 29,149
 29,853
 3.91
Vetcor Professional Practices, LLC (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Consumer Services L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 4/20/2021 25,001
 24,623
 25,164
 3.29


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2016
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1)Industry Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount Amortized Cost (6) Fair Value (7) Percentage of Net Assets
First Lien Debt (80.09%) (continued)             
Violin Finco S.A.R.L. (Alexander Mann Solutions) (United Kingdom) (2)(3)(4)(8)(13)
Business Services L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 12/20/2019 $10,065
 $10,012
 $10,058
 1.32%
Vistage Worldwide, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)(16)
Business Services L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 8/19/2021 28,757
 28,524
 28,688
 3.75
Vitera Healthcare Solutions, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 11/4/2020 9,104
 9,050
 9,078
 1.19
Winchester Electronics Corporation (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(15)
Capital Equipment L + 6.50% (1.00% Floor) 6/30/2022 27,367
 26,959
 27,460
 3.59
Zest Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Durable Consumer Goods L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 8/16/2020 9,530
 9,530
 9,584
 1.25
First Lien Debt Total        $1,145,326
 $1,139,548
 149.13%
              
Second Lien Debt (12.08%)             
AF Borrower LLC (Accuvant) (2)(3)(5)
High Tech Industries L + 9.00% (1.00% Floor) 1/30/2023 $8,000
 $7,934
 $8,000
 1.05%
AIM Group USA Inc. (2)(3)(5)(13)
Aerospace & Defense L + 9.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/2/2022 23,000
 22,701
 23,196
 3.04
AmeriLife Group, LLC (2)(3)(5)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 8.75% (1.00% Floor) 1/10/2023 20,000
 19,656
 19,208
 2.51
Argon Medical Devices, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 9.50% (1.00% Floor) 6/23/2022 24,000
 23,363
 24,233
 3.17
Berlin Packaging L.L.C. (2)(3)(5)(13)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 10/1/2022 2,927
 2,910
 2,953
 0.39
Charter NEX US Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(5)(13)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 8.25% (1.00% Floor) 2/5/2023 7,394
 7,303
 7,468
 0.98
Confie Seguros Holding II Co. (2)(3)(5)(16)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 9.00% (1.25% Floor) 5/8/2019 12,000
 11,921
 11,918
 1.56
Drew Marine Group Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 7.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/19/2021 12,500
 12,481
 12,333
 1.61
Genex Holdings, Inc. (2)(3)(5)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 7.75% (1.00% Floor) 5/30/2022 7,990
 7,915
 7,978
 1.04
Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (2)(3)(5)(13)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 4/29/2022 12,500
 12,408
 12,359
 1.62
Jazz Acquisition, Inc. (Wencor) (2)(3)(5)(13)
Aerospace & Defense L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 6/19/2022 6,700
 6,677
 5,572
 0.73
MRI Software, LLC (2)(3)(5)
Software L + 8.00% (1.00% Floor) 6/23/2022 11,250
 11,110
 11,265
 1.47
Power Stop, LLC (5)(9)
Automotive 11.00% 5/29/2022 10,000
 9,831
 9,863
 1.29
Prowler Acquisition Corp. (Pipeline Supply and Service, LLC) (2)(3)(5)
Wholesale L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 7/28/2020 3,000
 2,960
 1,682
 0.22
Vitera Healthcare Solutions, LLC (2)(3)(4)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 8.25% (1.00% Floor) 11/4/2021 2,000
 1,979
 1,945
 0.26
Watchfire Enterprises, Inc. (2)(3)(5)(13)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 8.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/2/2021 7,000
 6,932
 6,976
 0.91
Zywave, Inc. (2)(3)(5)
High Tech Industries L + 9.00% (1.00% Floor) 11/17/2023 4,950
 4,879
 4,915
 0.64
Second Lien Debt Total        $172,960
 $171,864
 22.49%


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2016
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1) Industry Maturity Date Par Amount Amortized Cost (6) Fair Value (7) Percentage of Net Assets
Structured Finance Obligations (0.37%) (5)(8)(11)            
1776 CLO I, Ltd., Subordinated Notes Structured Finance 5/8/2020 $11,750
 $6,739
 $2,761
 0.36%
Clydesdale CLO 2005, Ltd., Subordinated Notes Structured Finance 12/6/2017 5,750
 
 10
 
MSIM Peconic Bay, Ltd., Subordinated Notes Structured Finance 7/20/2019 4,500
 63
 5
 
Nautique Funding Ltd., Income Notes Structured Finance 4/15/2020 5,000
 2,437
 2,440
 0.32
Structured Finance Obligations Total       $9,239
 $5,216
 0.68%
Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated (1) Industry Shares/Units Cost Fair Value (7) Percentage of Net Assets
Equity Investments (0.46%) (5)          
CIP Revolution Investments, LLC Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing 30,000
 $300
 $352
 0.05%
Derm Growth Partners III, LLC (Dermatology Associates) Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals 1,000,000
 1,000
 976
 0.13
GS Holdco LLC (Global Software, LLC) High Tech Industries 1,000,000
 1,001
 1,126
 0.15
Power Stop Intermediate Holdings, LLC Automotive 7,150
 715
 1,208
 0.16
T2 Systems Parent Corporation Transportation: Consumer 555,556
 556
 584
 0.07
THG Acquisition, LLC (The Hilb Group, LLC) Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 1,500,000
 1,499
 2,228
 0.29
Equity Investments Total     $5,071
 $6,474
 0.85%
Total Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated     $1,332,596
 $1,323,102
 173.15%
Investments—controlled/affiliatedIndustry Interest Rate (2) Maturity Date Par Amount/ LLC Interest Cost Fair Value (7) Percentage of Net Assets
Investment Fund (7.00%) (8)
             
Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC, Mezzanine Loan (2)(5)(9)(14)
Investment Fund L + 9.50% 6/24/2017 $62,384
 $62,384
 $62,384
 8.16%
Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC, Subordinated Loan and Member’s Interest (5)(14)
Investment Fund 0.001 3/1/2021 35,001
 35,001
 37,273
 4.88
Investment Fund Total        $97,385
 $99,657
 13.04%
Total investments—controlled/affiliated        $97,385
 $99,657
 13.04%
Total investments        $1,429,981
 $1,422,759
 186.19%

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, issuers of debt and equity investments held by the Company are domiciled in the United States and issuers of structured finance obligations are domiciled in the Cayman Islands. Under the Investment Company Act the Company would be deemed to “control” a portfolio company if the Company owned more than 25% of its outstanding voting securities and/or held the power to exercise control over the management or policies of the portfolio company. As of December 31, 2016, the Company does not “control” any of these portfolio companies. Under the Investment Company Act, the Company would be deemed an “affiliated person” of a portfolio company if the Company owns 5% or more of the portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities. As of December 31, 2016, the Company is not an “affiliated person” of any of these portfolio companies. 
(2)Variable rate loans to the portfolio companies bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to either LIBOR or an alternate base rate (commonly based on the Federal Funds Rate or the U.S. Prime Rate), which generally resets quarterly. For each such loan, the Company has provided the interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2016. As of December 31, 2016, all of our LIBOR loans were indexed to the 90-day LIBOR rate at 1.00%, except for those loans as indicated in Note 16 below.
(3)Loan includes interest rate floor feature.
(4)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the SPV. The SPV has entered into the SPV Credit Facility. The lenders of the SPV Credit Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the assets of the SPV. Accordingly, such assets are not available to creditors of the Company or the 2015-1 Issuer.
(5)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the Company. The Company has entered into the Credit Facility. The lenders of the Credit Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the portfolio investments held by the Company. Accordingly, such assets are not available to creditors of the SPV or the 2015-1 Issuer.
(6)Amortized cost represents original cost, including origination fees and upfront fees received that are deemed to be an adjustment to yield, adjusted for the accretion/amortization of discounts/premiums, as applicable, on debt investments using the effective interest method. Equity tranche CLO fund investments, which are referred to as “structured finance obligations”, are recorded at amortized cost using the effective interest method.


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2016
(dollar amounts in thousands)

(7)Fair value is determined in good faith by or under the direction of the Board of Directors of the Company (see Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, and Note 3, Fair Value Measurements), pursuant to the Company’s valuation policy.
(8)The Company has determined the indicated investments are non-qualifying assets under Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act. Under the Investment Company Act, the Company may not acquire any non-qualifying assets unless, at the time such acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the Company’s total assets.
(9)Represents a corporate mezzanine loan, which is subordinated to senior secured term loans of the portfolio company/investment fund.
(10)Loan was on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2016.
(11)As of December 31, 2016, the Company has a greater than 25% but less than 50% equity or subordinated notes ownership interest in certain structured finance obligations. These investments have governing documents that preclude the Company from controlling management of the entity and therefore the Company has determined that the issuer of the investment is not a controlled affiliate or a non-controlled affiliate because the investments are not “voting securities”.
(12)In addition to the interest earned based on the stated interest rate of this loan, which is the amount reflected in this schedule, the Company is entitled to receive additional interest as a result of an agreement among lenders as follows: Dimensional Dental Management, LLC (4.54%), EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (3.84%), International Medical Group, Inc. (4.64%), Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC (3.54%), PSI Services LLC (4.40%), Reliant Pro Rehab, LLC (nil) and The Hilb Group, LLC (3.96%). Pursuant to the agreement among lenders in respect of this loan, this investment represents a first lien/last out loan, which has a secondary priority behind the first lien/first out loan with respect to principal, interest and other payments.
(13)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the 2015-1 Issuer and secure the notes issued in connection with the 2015-1 Debt Securitization. Accordingly, such assets are not available to the creditors of the SPV or the Company.
(14)Under the Investment Company Act, the Company is deemed to be an “affiliated person” of and “control” this investment fund because the Company owns more than 25% of the investment fund’s outstanding voting securities and/or has the power to exercise control over management or policies of such investment fund. See Note 5, Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC, for more details.
(15)As of December 31, 2016, the Company had the following unfunded commitments to fund delayed draw and revolving senior secured loans:
First Lien Debt—unfunded delayed draw and revolving term loans commitmentsType Unused Fee Par/ Principal Amount Fair Value
Advanced Instruments, LLCRevolver 0.50% $2,500
 $(25)
Captive Resources Midco, LLCRevolver 0.50% 1,875
 (2)
Captive Resources Midco, LLCDelayed Draw 1.25% 3,125
 (4)
CIP Revolution Holdings, LLCRevolver 0.50% 1,331
 6
CIP Revolution Holdings, LLCDelayed Draw 0.75% 1,331
 6
Derm Growth Partners III, LLC (Dermatology Associates)Revolver 0.50% 1,672
 1
Derm Growth Partners III, LLC (Dermatology Associates)Delayed Draw 1.00% 5,247
 4
Dimensional Dental Management, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00% 2,507
 (23)
Dimora Brands, Inc. (fka TK USA Enterprises, Inc.)Revolver 0.50% 4,750
 (30)
Direct Travel, Inc.Delayed Draw 1.00% 9,658
 (56)
Green Plains II LLCRevolver 0.50% 1,352
 14
National Technical Systems, Inc.Revolver 0.50% 2,031
 (102)
National Technical Systems, Inc.Delayed Draw 1.00% 4,469
 (165)
OnCourse Learning CorporationRevolver 0.50% 859
 2
PT Intermediate Holdings III, LLC (Parts Town)Revolver 0.50% 2,025
 15
Superior Health Linens, LLCRevolver 0.50% 2,735
 (17)
T2 Systems, Inc.Revolver 0.50% 2,933
 29
The Hilb Group, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00% 3,810
 16
Vetcor Professional Practices, LLCDelayed Draw 1.00% 3,057
 18
Winchester Electronics CorporationDelayed Draw 1.00% 2,500
 8
Total unfunded commitments    $59,767
 $(305)
(16)As of December 31, 2016, this LIBOR loan was indexed to the 30-day LIBOR rate at 0.77%.


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2016
(dollar amounts in thousands)
As of December 31, 2016, investments at fair value consisted of the following:
Type Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value
First Lien Debt (excluding First Lien/Last Out) $964,398
 $955,478
 67.15%
First Lien/Last Out Unitranche 180,928
 184,070
 12.94
Second Lien Debt 172,960
 171,864
 12.08
Structured Finance Obligations 9,239
 5,216
 0.37
Equity Investments 5,071
 6,474
 0.46
Investment Fund 97,385
 99,657
 7.00
Total $1,429,981
 $1,422,759
 100.00%
The rate type of debt investments at fair value as of December 31, 2016 was as follows:
Rate Type Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value of First and Second Lien Debt
Floating Rate $1,308,455
 $1,301,549
 99.25%
Fixed Rate 9,831
 9,863
 0.75
Total $1,318,286
 $1,311,412
 100.00%
The industry composition of investments at fair value as of December 31, 2016 was as follows:
Industry Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value
Aerospace & Defense $62,759
 $61,371
 4.31%
Automotive 37,780
 38,414
 2.70
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate 148,577
 150,700
 10.59
Beverage, Food & Tobacco 15,059
 15,379
 1.08
Business Services 149,205
 141,784
 9.97
Capital Equipment 36,811
 37,316
 2.62
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber 19,784
 19,801
 1.39
Construction & Building 23,403
 23,691
 1.67
Consumer Services 78,693
 79,941
 5.62
Containers, Packaging & Glass 49,442
 47,706
 3.35
Durable Consumer Goods 19,930
 19,932
 1.40
Energy: Electricity 36,783
 36,758
 2.59
Energy: Oil & Gas 11,132
 10,911
 0.77
Environmental Industries 40,763
 41,299
 2.90
Forest Products & Paper 23,752
 23,924
 1.68
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals 159,072
 161,544
 11.36
High Tech Industries 45,617
 46,317
 3.26
Hotel, Gaming & Leisure 30,450
 30,014
 2.11
Investment Fund 97,385
 99,657
 7.00
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing 70,988
 71,999
 5.06
Metals & Mining 10,232
 10,259
 0.72
Non-durable Consumer Goods 32,759
 29,348
 2.06
Retail 8,625
 8,320
 0.58
Software 11,110
 11,265
 0.79
Structured Finance 9,239
 5,216
 0.37
Telecommunications 108,553
 110,359
 7.76
Transportation: Cargo 34,323
 34,306
 2.41
Transportation: Consumer 26,841
 27,882
 1.96
Wholesale 30,914
 27,346
 1.92
Total $1,429,981
 $1,422,759
 100.00%


TCG BDC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2016
(dollar amounts in thousands)
The geographical composition of investments at fair value as of December 31, 2016 was as follows:
Geography Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value
Cayman Islands $9,239
 $5,216
 0.37%
United Kingdom 21,144
 20,969
 1.47
United States 1,399,598
 1,396,574
 98.16
Total $1,429,981
 $1,422,759
 100.00%

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



TCG BDC, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As of December 31, 2017
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

1. ORGANIZATION
TCG BDC, Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “we,” “us,” “our,” “TCG BDC” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation formed on February 8, 2012, and structured as an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company. GMS Finance is externally managed by CGMSIM, an investment adviser that is registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). The CGMSIM team managing our investments (the “CGMSIM Investment Team”) forms the exclusive Carlyle platform for U.S. middle market debt investments.

GMS Finance’s investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation primarily through debt investments in U.S. middle market companies, which we define as companies with approximately $10 million to $100 million of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). GMS Finance seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in first lien senior secured loans (which may include stand-alone first lien loans; “last out” first lien loans, which are loans that have a secondary priority behind “first out” first lien loans; “unitranche” loans, which are loans that combine features of first lien, second lien or subordinated loans, generally in a first lien position; and secured corporate bonds with features similar to the features of these categories of first lien loans) and second lien senior secured loans (which may include senior secured loans, and, to a lesser extent, secured corporate bonds, with a secondary priority behind first lien loans) (collectively, “Middle Market Senior Loans”). The Middle Market Senior Loans are generally made to private U.S. middle market companies that are, in many cases, controlled by private equity firms. Depending on market conditions, GMS Finance expects that between 70% and 80% of the value of its assets will be invested in Middle Market Senior Loans, with the balance invested in higher-yielding investments, which may include middle market junior loans such as corporate mezzanine loans, equity co-investments, broadly syndicated first lien and second lien senior secured loans, high-yield bonds, structured finance obligations and/or other opportunistic investments. We expect that the composition of our portfolio will change over time given our Investment Adviser’s view on, among other things, the economic and credit environment (including with respect to interest rates) in which we are operating.

The growth and development of our Company has been guided by several fundamental tenets:

Experienced Investment TeamThe Company is managed by an experienced management teamits investment adviser, Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C. (formerly known as Carlyle GMS Investment Management L.L.C., “CGCIM” or “Investment Adviser”), a wholly owned subsidiary of investment professionals with extensive middle market lending experience. Our Adviser’s investment

committee that is responsible for reviewing and approving our Middle Market Senior Loan investments (the “CGMSIM Investment Committee”) consists of seasoned investment professionals from across the Global Market Strategies (“GMS”) segment of Carlyle.

Attractive Origination ModelThe CGMSIM Investment Team’s multi-channel origination model produces attractive investment opportunities through a variety of sources including over 200 private equity firms, other middle market lenders, financial advisors and experienced management teams to source debt investments in middle market companies and to source other high-yielding investments that provide attractive risk-adjusted returns. The CGMSIM Investment Team has cultivated very strong relationships with private equity sponsors and debt capital providers, with whom we work with closely in sourcing and executing transactions.

Diligent Investment Strategy—Our investment decisions are based on in-depth, fundamental underwriting and credit research grounded in a conservative credit orientation. This systematic, consistent approach is augmented by industry expertise and tenured underwriting professionals who both lead the CGMSIM Investment Team and serve on the CGMSIM Investment Committee.

Leverage the GMS PlatformCarlyle Group L.P. The Company benefits from the well branded and scalable origination and underwriting platform of GMS. The CGMSIM Investment Team leverages the industry expertise of 11 structured credit research analysts who currently advise the GMS collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) funds and cover approximately 20 industries.

Leverage the Carlyle Network—Carlyle, a leading global alternative asset manager, provides infrastructure, including back-office support, reporting assistance and accounting resources, and investment insight through proprietary deal flow, industry experience and sector knowledge.

The following highlights illustrate our accomplishments since the commencement of our operations:

Capital Commitments and Investments—As of March 11, 2016, we have raised a total of $1.2 billion in total capital commitments in GMS Finance. Of that total, and inclusive of the use of leverage and recycled proceeds from sales and paydowns, we have deployed $1.1 billion in 87 funded first lien debt investments, $233.8 million in 28 funded second lien debt investments, $126.6 million in 27 structured finance obligations and $2.2 million in 2 equity investments through December 31, 2015.

Credit Facilities and the 2015-1 Notes—On May 24, 2013, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Borrower Sub, entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with a maximum principal amount of $400 million. In addition, on March 21, 2014, the Company entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Facility”) with a maximum principal amount of $150 million. Further, on June 26, 2015, the Company completed a $400 million term debt securitization (the “2015-1 Debt Securitization”). The notes offered in the 2015-1 Debt Securitization (the “2015-1 Notes”) were issued by the 2015-1 Issuer, a wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary of the Company.

Credit Platform Enhancements—The CGMSIM Investment Team has continued to expand and enhance all facets of the credit platform supporting the Company. Additional senior origination professionals were added during the year which meaningfully expanded the direct sourcing capabilities. The origination platform now has offices in New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles covering over 200 private equity firms. The scale of the direct origination platform allows the Company to maximizes the investment opportunity set and increase overall investment selectivity. Direct origination has several important benefits including optimizing transaction economics, improving the strength of the loan documentation, and providing greater access to due diligence materials. Additional senior resources were added to the capital markets group, further enhancing investment sourcing and syndication capabilities with other lenders, including banks, finance companies, credit funds, and other business development companies. Additional professionals were added to the underwriting and portfolio management team to support the overall increase in investment activity and portfolio growth. This

team works closely with the origination and capital markets professionals, as well as the GMS industry research analysts in executing all facets of transaction due diligence and portfolio management. Further enhancements and additions will be made as appropriate to ensure that the CGMSIM Investment Team continues to have best in class execution across each segment of the business.

Strong Management Alignment With Investors—Certain members of Carlyle’s senior management team, Carlyle employees and operating executives, and certain partners and affiliates of Carlyle committed to purchase an aggregate of approximately $63.0 million of common stock, of which $29.4 million was funded as of December 31, 2015. Prior to a Qualified IPO, from time to time, CGMSIM intends to pay certain individuals providing services to CGMSIM, including members of the CGMSIM Investment Team, in shares of our common stock and/or in cash a portion of the net after-tax incentive fees that CGMSIM receives from us (not to exceed 25%) in consideration of their services on behalf of CGMSIM. To the extent that any such payment is in shares of our common stock, CGMSIM will purchase such shares from us and distribute the shares to the individuals eligible for such payment, and, to the extent that any such payment is in cash, CGMSIM will require the individuals eligible for such payment to make capital commitments to purchase newly issued shares of our common stock. In addition, following the completion of a Qualified IPO, from time to time, CGMSIM intends to purchase shares of our common stock in the open market at a purchase price, in the aggregate, equal to approximately 25% of each installment of the net after-tax incentive fees that CGMSIM receives from us, subject to market conditions. CGMSIM may then distribute those shares to members of the CGMSIM Investment Team and other individuals eligible for such payment in consideration of their services on behalf of CGMSIM.

GMS Finance

GMS Finance is a Maryland corporation formed on February 8, 2012. On May 2, 2013, GMS Finance filed its electionelected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the “Investment Company Act”). GMS FinanceIn addition, the Company has elected to be treated, and intends to continue to comply with the requirements to qualify annually, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the(together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the “Code”).

The Company’s investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation primarily through debt investments in U.S. middle market companies, which the Company defines as companies with approximately $10 million to $100 million of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), which the Company believes is a useful proxy for cash flow. The Company seeks to achieve its investment objective primarily through direct originations of secured debt, including first lien senior secured loans (which may include stand-alone first lien loans, first lien/last out loans and “unitranche” loans) and second lien senior secured loans (collectively, “Middle Market Senior Loans”), with the balance of our assets invested in higher yielding investments (which may include unsecured debt, mezzanine debt and investments in equities). The Middle Market Senior Loans are generally made to private U.S. middle market companies that are, in many cases, controlled by private equity firms. Depending on market conditions, the Company expects that between 70% and 80% of the value of its assets will be invested in Middle Market Senior Loans. The Company expects that the composition of its portfolio will change over time given the Investment Adviser’s view on, among other things, the economic and credit environment (including with respect to interest rates) in which the Company is operating.
The Company invests primarily in loans to middle market companies whose debt, if rated, is rated below investment grade, and, if not rated, would likely be rated below investment grade if it were rated (that is, below BBB- or Baa3, which is often referred to as “junk”). Exposure to below investment grade instruments involves certain risks, including speculation with respect to the borrower’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal.
On May 2, 2013, GMS Financethe Company completed its Initial Closinginitial closing of capital commitments (the “Initial Closing”) and subsequently commenced substantial investment operations. Prior to May 2, 2013,Effective March 15, 2017, the Company changed its name from “Carlyle GMS Finance, had not commenced operations and was a development stage company as defined by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915,Development Stage Entity. During this time, GMS Finance focused substantially all ofInc.” to “TCG BDC, Inc.” On June 19, 2017, the Company closed its efforts on establishing its business. If GMS Finance has not consummated an initial public offering (“IPO”), issuing 9,454,200 shares of its common stock that results in an unaffiliated public float of at least 15%(including shares issued pursuant to the exercise of the aggregate capital commitments received prior to the date of such initialunderwriters’ over-allotment option on July 5, 2017) at a public offering (a “Qualified IPO”) by May 2, 2018, then our Boardprice of Directors (subject to any necessary stockholder approvals and applicable requirements$18.50 per share. Net of underwriting costs, the Investment Company Act) will use its best efforts to wind down and/or liquidate and dissolvereceived cash proceeds of $169,488. Shares of common stock of TCG BDC began trading on the Company.

GMS Finance isNASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CGBD” on June 14, 2017.

Until December 31, 2017, the Company was an “emerging growth company”company,” as definedthat term is used in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). GMS Finance will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years following an initial public offering, although if2012. As of June 30, 2017, the market value of the common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, GMS Finance would ceaseexceeded $700,000. Accordingly, the Company ceased to be an emerging growth company as of December 31, 2017.
The Company is externally managed by the following December 31.

Investment Adviser, an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Carlyle Global Credit Administration L.L.C. (formerly known as Carlyle GMS Finance Administration L.L.C., “CGCA” or the “Administrator”) provides the administrative services necessary for the Company to operate. Both the Investment Adviser and the Administrator are wholly owned subsidiaries of Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., a subsidiary of The Borrower SubCarlyle Group L.P. “Carlyle” refers to The Carlyle Group L.P. and its affiliates and its consolidated subsidiaries (other than portfolio companies of its affiliated funds), a global alternative asset manager publicly traded on NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CG”. Refer to the sec.gov website for further information on Carlyle.

TCG BDC SPV LLC (the “SPV”) is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed on January 3, 2013. The Borrower SubSPV invests in first and second lien senior secured loans. The Borrower SubSPV is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and is


consolidated in ourthese consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K commencing from the date of its formation, January 3, 2013.

Effective March 15, 2017, the SPV changed its name from “Carlyle GMS Finance SPV LLC” to “TCG BDC SPV LLC”.

On June 9, 2017, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 3, 2017 (the “Agreement”), by and between the Company and NF Investment Corp. (“NFIC”), NFIC merged with and into the Company (the “NFIC Acquisition”), with the Company as the surviving entity. The NFIC Acquisition was accounted for as an asset acquisition. NFIC SPV LLC (the “NFIC SPV” and, together with the SPV, the “SPVs”) is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed on June 18, 2013. Upon the consummation of the NFIC Acquisition, the NFIC SPV became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and is consolidated in these consolidated financial statements commencing from the closing date of the NFIC Acquisition, June 9, 2017. Refer to Note 13, NFIC Acquisition, for details.
On June 26, 2015, the Company completed a $400,000 term debt securitization (the “2015-1 Debt Securitization”). The notes offered in the 2015-1 Debt Securitization. The 2015-1 NotesSecuritization (the “2015-1 Notes”) were issued by theCarlyle GMS Finance MM CLO 2015-1 Issuer,LLC (the “2015-1 Issuer”), a wholly-ownedwholly owned and consolidated subsidiary of the Company, and are secured by a diversified portfolio of the 2015-1 Issuer consisting primarily of first and second lien senior secured loans. Refer to Note 7 for details. The 2015-1 Issuer is consolidated in ourthese consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K commencing from the date of its formation, May 8, 2015.

GMS Finance

On February 29, 2016, the Company and Credit Partners USA LLC (“Credit Partners”) entered into an amended and restated limited liability company agreement, which was subsequently amended on June 24, 2016 (as amended, the “Limited Liability Company Agreement”) to co-manage Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC (“Credit Fund”). Credit Fund primarily invests in first lien loans of middle market companies. Credit Fund is externally managed by our Investment Adviser, an investment adviser registered undera six-member board of managers, on which the Advisers Act. Our Administrator provides the administrative services necessaryCompany and Credit Partners each have equal representation. The Company and Credit Partners each have 50% economic ownership of Credit Fund and have commitments to fund, from time to time, capital of up to $400,000 each. Refer to Note 5, Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC, for us to operate. Both the Investment Adviser and the Administrator are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C. (“CIM”), a subsidiary of Carlyle.

details.

As a BDC, GMS Financethe Company is required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. As part of these requirements, the Company must not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” specified in the Investment Company Act unless, at the time the acquisition is made, at least 70% of its total assets are qualifying assets (with certain limited exceptions).

GMS Finance has elected to be treated, and intends to continue to comply with the requirements to qualify annually, as a RIC under the Code, and operates in a manner so as to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs.

To qualify as a RIC, GMS Financethe Company must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements and timely distribute to its stockholders generally at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each year. Pursuant to this election, GMS Financethe Company generally does not have to pay corporate level taxes on any income that it distributes to stockholders, provided that GMS Financethe Company satisfies those requirements.

About Our Adviser

Our

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The Company is an investment activitiescompany for the purposes of accounting and financial reporting in accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-08, Financial Services—Investment Companies (“ASU 2013-08”): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure Requirements. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, the SPV and the 2015-1 Issuer. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. US GAAP for an investment company requires investments to be recorded at fair value. The carrying value for all other assets and liabilities approximates their fair value.

The annual financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP for annual financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-K and Article 6 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for the fair presentation of consolidated financial statements for the years presented have been included.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management’s estimates are managed by our Investment Adviser. CGMSIM is responsible for sourcing potential investments, conducting researchbased on historical experiences and due diligence on prospectiveother factors, including expectations of future events that


management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. Assumptions and estimates regarding the valuation of investments and equity sponsors, analyzing investment opportunities, structuring our investments and monitoring our investments and portfolio companiestheir resulting impact on an ongoing basis. For providing these services, the Investment Adviser receives fees from us pursuant to an investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”). For more information on the Investment Advisory Agreement, including the fees consisting of two components—a base management fee and an incentive fee, see Note 4fees involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and these assumptions and estimates may be significant to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates and such differences could be material.
Investments
Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of this Form 10-K.

The CGMSIM Investment Committee, which also serves as the investment committeeusing the specific identification method without regard to NF Investment Corp. (“NFIC”),unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments as presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations reflects the net change in the fair value of investments, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized. See Note 3 for further information about fair value measurements.

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments (e.g. money market funds, U.S. treasury notes) with original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held with two large financial institutions and cash held in such financial institutions may, at times, exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit.
Revenue Recognition
Interest from Investments and Realized Gain/Loss on Investments
Interest income is led by Michael J. Petrick, Managing Directorrecorded on an accrual basis and includes the accretion of Carlyle, Chairmandiscounts and amortization of premiums. Discounts from and premiums to par value on debt investments purchased are accreted/amortized into interest income over the life of the CGMSIM Investment Committee, Headrespective security using the effective interest method. The amortized cost of GMSdebt investments represents the original cost, including origination fees and Chairmanupfront fees received that are deemed to be an adjustment to yield, adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums, if any. At time of exit, the realized gain or loss on an investment is the difference between the amortized cost at time of exit and the cash received at exit using the specific identification method.
The Company may have loans in its portfolio that contain payment-in-kind (“PIK”) provisions. PIK represents interest that is accrued and recorded as interest income at the contractual rates, increases the loan principal on the respective capitalization dates, and is generally due at maturity. Such income is included in interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2017, the fair value of the GMS Finance and NFIC Boardsloan in the portfolio with PIK provisions was $15,451, which represents approximately 0.8% of Directors, and Michael A. Hart, Managing Directortotal investments at fair value. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company earned $1,057 in PIK income included in interest income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Carlyle, President of GMS Finance and NFIC and member of the GMS Finance and NFIC Boards of Directors. Other members of the CGMSIM Investment Committee include senior GMS investment professionals who are responsible for reviewing and approving our investments. The CGMSIM Investment Committee members are seasoned investment professionals with experience through different credit cycles.

Pursuant to a personnel agreement between the Investment Adviser and The Carlyle Group Employee Co., L.L.C. (“Carlyle Employee Co.”), an affiliate of the Investment Adviser, Carlyle Employee Co. provides the Investment Adviser with access to investment professionals that comprise the CGMSIM Investment Team.Operations. As of March 11,December 31, 2016 and for the CGMSIM Investment Team includes a team of approximately 18 investment professionals designated from Carlyle’s GMS platform.

Our executive officers and directors, the employees of the Investment Adviser and members of the CGMSIM Investment Committee serve or may serve as investment advisors, officers, directors or principals of entities or investment funds that operateyear then ended, no loans in the same or a related line of business as we do and/orportfolio contained PIK provisions.

Dividend Income
Dividend income from the investment

funds, accounts and other similar arrangements advised by Carlyle. An affiliated fund is recorded on the record date for the investment vehicle currently formed, such as NFIC, or formed in the future and managed by the Investment Adviser or its affiliates may have overlapping investment objectives and strategies with our own and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by us. As a result, the Investment Adviser and/or its affiliates may face conflicts in allocating investment opportunities between us and such other entities. Accordingly, we may not be given the opportunity to participate in certain investments made by investment funds managed by advisors affiliated with the Investment Adviser. However, the Investment Adviser and its affiliates will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner and consistent with applicable allocation procedures. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and StructureThere are significant potential conflicts of interest, including the management of NFIC, other funds affiliated with Carlyle by our Investment Adviser’s key investment professionals, which could impact our investment returns” in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K for more information.

Prior to a Qualified IPO, from time to time, CGMSIM intends to pay certain individuals providing services to CGMSIM, including members of the CGMSIM Investment Team, in shares of our common stock and/or in cash a portion of the net after-tax incentive fees that CGMSIM receives from us (not to exceed 25%) in consideration of their services on behalf of CGMSIM. To the extent that any such payment is in shares of our common stock, CGMSIM will purchase such shares from us and distribute the shares to the individuals eligible for such payment, and,fund to the extent that any such payment is in cash, CGMSIM will requireamounts are payable by the individuals eligible forinvestment fund and are expected to be collected.

Other Income
Other income may include income such payment to make capital commitments to purchase newly issued shares of our common stock. In addition, followingas consent, waiver, amendment, syndication and prepayment fees associated with the completion of a Qualified IPO, from time to time, CGMSIM intends to purchase shares of our common stock in the open market at a purchase price, in the aggregate, equal to approximately 25% of each installment of the net after-tax incentive fees that CGMSIM receives from us, subject to market conditions. CGMSIM may then distribute those shares to members of the CGMSIM Investment Team and other individuals eligible for such payment in consideration of their services on behalf of CGMSIM.

On February 26, 2014, the SEC granted us and NFIC,Company’s investment activities as well as future funds advisedany fees for managerial assistance services rendered by CGMSIM, exemptive relief (“Exemptive Relief”)the Company to co-investthe portfolio companies. Such fees are recognized as income when earned or the services are rendered. The Company may receive fees for guaranteeing the outstanding debt of a portfolio company. Such fees are amortized into other income over the life of the guarantee. The unamortized amount, if any, is included in suitable investments, subject to certain terms and conditionsother assets in the Exemptive Relief. In addition, weaccompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and NFICLiabilities. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company earned $10,526, $6,635 and $834, respectively, in other income, primarily from amendment, syndication and prepayment fees.

Non-Accrual Income


Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past due 30 days or more or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected in full. Accrued and unpaid interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may invest alongside other affiliated fundsbe recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and personsinterest are paid current and, in certain circumstances where doing somanagement’s judgment, are likely to remain current. Management may not place a loan on non-accrual status if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is consistent with applicable lawin the process of collection. As of December 31, 2017 and SEC staff interpretations, including2016, the entities’ investment objectives and policies. For example, we may invest alongside such funds consistent with guidance promulgated by the SEC staff permitting us and such other funds to purchase interests in a single class of privately placed securities so long as certain conditions are met, including that CGMSIM, acting on our behalf and on behalf of its other clients, and other affiliated funds and persons negotiates no term other than price.

About Carlyle

Carlyle is onefair value of the world’s largestloan in the portfolio on non-accrual status was $19,487 and most diversified multi-product global alternative asset management firms. Carlyle$7,628, respectively, which represents approximately 1.0% and its affiliates advise an array0.5%, respectively, of specialized investment fundstotal investments at fair value. The remaining first and other investment vehicles that invest across a range of industries, geographies, asset classessecond lien debt investments were performing and investment strategies. Since its founding in Washington, D.C. in 1987, Carlyle has grown to become a leading global alternative asset manager with more than $183 billion in assets under management (“AUM”) across 126 funds and 160 fund of funds vehiclescurrent on their interest payments as of December 31, 2015. Carlyle has more than 1,700 employees,2017 and 2016 and for the years then ended.

SPV Credit Facility, Credit Facility and 2015-1 Notes Related Costs, Expenses and Deferred Financing Costs (See Note 6, Borrowings, and Note 7, 2015-1 Notes)
Interest expense and unused commitment fees on the SPV Credit Facility and Credit Facility are recorded on an accrual basis. Unused commitment fees are included in credit facility fees in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The SPV Credit Facility and Credit Facility are recorded at carrying value, which approximates fair value.
Deferred financing costs include capitalized expenses related to the closing or amendments of the SPV Credit Facility and Credit Facility. Amortization of deferred financing costs for each credit facility is computed on the straight-line basis over the respective term of each credit facility, except for a portion that was accelerated in connection with the amendment of the SPV Credit Facility as described in Note 6. The unamortized balance of such costs is included in deferred financing costs in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The amortization of such costs is included in credit facility fees in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Debt issuance costs include capitalized expenses including more than 700 investment professionalsstructuring and arrangement fees related to the offering of the 2015-1 Notes. Amortization of debt issuance costs for the 2015-1 Notes is computed on the effective yield method over the term of the 2015-1 Notes. The unamortized balance of such costs is presented as a direct deduction to the carrying amount of the 2015-1 Notes in 36 offices across six continents,the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and serves over 1700 active carryLiabilities. The amortization of such costs is included in interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The 2015-1 Notes are recorded at carrying value, which approximates fair value.
Organization and Offering Costs
Offering costs consist primarily of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the offering of shares, including legal, underwriting, printing and other costs, as well as costs associated with the preparation and filing of applicable registration statements. Upon consummation of the IPO, the Company is no longer a closed–end fund investors from 78 countries.

Carlyle’s GMS platform was established in 1999 with its first high yield fund. As ofa continuous offering period and, thus, offering costs are charged against equity when incurred. During the year ended December 31, 2015, it advises a group2017, $3,088 of 68 active funds that pursue investment strategies including long/short credit, long/short emerging markets equities, macroeconomic strategies, commodities trading, and structured transactions, quantitative market strategies, leveraged loans and structured credit, energy mezzanine opportunities, middle market lending and distressed debt.

Primary areasthe offering costs were incurred, 50% of focus for Carlyle’s GMS teams include:

Structured Credit Funds.The structured credit funds invest primarily in performing senior secured bank loans through structured vehicles and other investment vehicles. In 2015, Carlyle closed five new U.S. CLOs and three CLOs in Europe with a total of $2.8 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, of AUM at December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the structured credit team advised 43 structured credit funds and one carry fund in the United States, Europe, and Asia totaling, in the aggregate, approximately $18.4 billion in AUM.

Distressed and Corporate Opportunities.The distressed and corporate opportunities funds generally invest in liquid and illiquid securities and obligations, including secured debt, senior and subordinated unsecured debt, convertible debt obligations, preferred stock and public and private equity of financially distressed companies in defensive and asset-rich industries. In certain investments, these funds may seek to restructure pre-reorganization debt claims into controlling positions in the equity of reorganized companies. As of December 31, 2015, Carlyle’s distressed and corporate opportunities team advised two funds totaling, in the aggregate, over $1.4 billion in AUM.

Middle Market Finance.The middle market finance business is comprised of Carlyle’s BDCs (including us), a CLO consisting of middle market senior, first lien loans, and Carlyle’s corporate mezzanine funds, which invest in the first-lien, second-lien and mezzanine loans of middle-market companies, typically defined as companies with annual EBITDA ranging from $10 million to $100 million that lack access to the broadly syndicated loan and bond markets. As of December 31, 2015, Carlyle’s middle market investment team advised five funds totaling, in the aggregate, approximately $2.2 billion in AUM.

Energy Mezzanine Opportunities.The energy mezzanine opportunities team invests primarily in privately negotiated mezzanine debt investments in North American energy and power projects and companies. As of December 31, 2015, Carlyle’s energy mezzanine opportunities team advised two funds with approximately $4.3 billion in AUM.

Long/Short Credit.Claren Road Asset Management LLC (“Claren Road”) advises two long/short credit hedge funds focusing on the global high grade and high yield markets totaling, in the aggregate, over $3.4 billion in AUM as of December 31, 2015, which includes $2.3 billion of AUM that is subject to outstanding redemption requests as of the beginning of the first quarter of 2016. Claren Road seeks to profit from market mispricing of long and/or short positions in corporate bonds and loans, and their derivatives, across investment grade, below investment grade (high yield) or distressed companies.

Emerging Market Equity and Macroeconomic Strategies.Emerging Sovereign Group LLC (“ESG”) advises six emerging markets equities and macroeconomic hedge funds with $4.3 billion in the aggregate of AUM as of December 31, 2015, which includes $0.7 billion of AUM that is subject to outstanding redemption requests as of the beginning of the first quarter of 2016. ESG’s emerging markets equities funds invest in publicly-traded equities across a range of developing countries. ESG’s macroeconomic funds pursue investment strategies in developed and developing countries, and opportunities resulting from changes in the global economic environment.

Commodities. Carlyle Commodity Management LLC (f/k/a Vermillion Asset Management LLC), a New York-based commodities investment manager (“CCM”) advises five hedge funds and two structured product fund totaling, in the aggregate, approximately $1.3 billion of AUM as of December 31, 2015, which includes $0.1 billion of AUM that is subject to outstanding redemption requests as of the beginning of the first quarter of 2016. CCM’s investment strategies include relative value, enhanced index and long-biased physical commodities, commodity sector-focused funds, and structured transactions. CCM seeks to produce positive, uncorrelated returns, through a liquid, relative-value, low volatility approach to trading both physical commodities and their derivatives and structuring transactions in physical commodities.

NFIC is an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC underwhich were paid by the Investment Adviser.

Income Taxes
For federal income tax purposes, the Company Act and has elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code. NFIC seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in Middle Market Senior Loans, subject to, in the case of second lien senior secured loans, a limit of 10% of NFIC’s total assets. In addition, NFIC may invest up to 10% of its total assets in high yield securities whose risk profile, as determined at the sole discretion of the Investment Adviser, is similar to or better than the risk profile of Middle Market Senior Loans. NFIC has the same Adviser and Administrator as us. Refer to the sec.gov website for further information on NFIC.

Carlyle sponsors several investment funds, accounts and other similar arrangements with strategies overlapping with our strategy, including, without limitation, NFIC, Carlyle Energy Mezzanine Opportunities Fund and successor funds, Carlyle Strategic Partners series of funds, as well as carry funds, hedge funds, managed accounts and structured credit CLO funds. The terms of certain of these investment funds, accounts or other similar arrangements require Carlyle to allocate investment opportunities to such investment funds in priority to allocations to other vehicles, such as us. As a result, there are circumstances where investments appropriate for us are instead allocated, in whole or in part, to such other investment funds, accounts or other similar arrangements. Where Carlyle otherwise has discretion to allocate investment opportunities among various funds, accounts and other similar arrangements, it should be noted that Carlyle may determine to allocate such investment opportunities away from us. Apart from the circumstances described above, Carlyle is presented with investment opportunities that generally fall within our investment objective and that of other Carlyle investment funds or managed accounts, whether focused on a debt strategy or otherwise, and in such circumstances Carlyle allocates such opportunities among us and such other Carlyle funds on a basis that Carlyle determines to be fair and reasonable taking into account the sourcing of the transaction, the nature of the investment focus of each such other Carlyle investment fund, the relative amounts of capital available for investment, the nature and extent of involvement in the transaction on the part of the respective teams of investment professionals, any requirements contained in the partnership agreements of such other Carlyle funds and other considerations deemed relevant by Carlyle in good faith. Consistent with the foregoing, Carlyle expects that other Carlyle investment funds will make investments in the debt of private companies. In addition, Carlyle expects that we will make investments in geographic regions in which other Carlyle investment funds have been or may be specifically organized to invest.

In addition, NFIC invests in Middle Market Senior Loans, and thus substantially all investment opportunities that fall within our investment objective may also fall within NFIC’s investment objective. On February 26, 2014, the SEC granted us and NFIC, as well as future funds advised by CGMSIM, Exemptive Relief to co-invest in suitable investments, subject to certain terms and conditions in the Exemptive Relief.

While Carlyle and CGMSIM seek to implement their respective allocation processes in a fair and equitable manner under the particular circumstances, there can be no assurance that it will result in equivalent allocation of or participation in investment opportunities or equivalent performance of investments allocated to us as compared to the other entities.

Carlyle may also from time to time form or have financial or operational interests in the management of one or more hedge funds or similar alternative investment vehicles which may be permitted to allocate a portion of their portfolios to long-dated, illiquid, restricted, or other similar securities and investment opportunities (which may include private equity and mezzanine investments), and whose investment strategies may therefore overlap with ours. It is therefore possible that such hedge funds may consider the same investment opportunities as us. Generally, any private debt investments that may be made by such hedge funds would (i) only be made as part of a broader investment portfolio and be limited to a minority percentage of the hedge fund’s overall portfolio and (ii) generally be expected to be passive minority investments, made on an opportunistic basis. Nevertheless, it cannot be completely ruled out that such hedge funds may on any given occasion compete with us for the same investment opportunity.

About Our Administrator

CGMSFA, a Delaware limited liability company, serves as our Administrator. Pursuant to an administration agreement between us and the Administrator (the “Administration Agreement”), the Administrator provides services to us and we reimburse the Administrator for its costs and expenses and our allocable portion of overhead incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including our allocable portion of the compensation of certain of our officers and staff. In addition, the Administrator has entered into a sub-administration agreement with Carlyle Employee Co. (the “Carlyle Employee Co. Sub-Administration Agreement”) and a sub-administration agreement with CELF Advisors LLP (“CELF” and such agreement, the “CELF Sub-Administration Agreement”), which provide the Administrator with access to personnel. The Administrator has also entered into a sub-administration agreement with State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street” and such agreement, the “State Street Sub-Administration Agreement”), which serves as our custodian, transfer agent, distribution paying agent and registrar.

Competition

Our primary competitors in providing financing to middle market companies include public and private funds, other BDCs, including affiliated funds, commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity and hedge funds. Many of our potential competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than we do, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the Investment Company Act and the Code, impose on us. The competitive pressures we face may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

We expect to use the expertise of the members of the CGMSIM Investment Committee and the CGMSIM Investment Team to assess investment risks and determine appropriate pricing for our investments. In addition, we expect that the relationships developed by the CGMSIM Investment Team will enable us to learn about and compete effectively for, financing opportunities with attractive middle market companies in the industries in which we seek to invest. For additional information concerning the competitive risks we face, see Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K“Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Investments—We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities, and compete with investment vehicles sponsored or advised by our affiliates”.

Staffing

We do not currently have any employees. Our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and Chief Operating Officer presently serve as a principal or managing director of Carlyle and are retained by CGMSFA pursuant to the Carlyle Employee Co. Sub-Administration Agreement. Our Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary presently serves as a director of Carlyle and is retained by CGMSFA pursuant to the CELF Sub-Administration Agreement. Each of these professionals performs their respective functions for us under the terms of our Administration Agreement.

Our day-to-day investment operations are managed by CGMSIM. Pursuant to its personnel agreement with Carlyle Employee Co., CGMSIM has access to the members of the CGMSIM Investment Committee, and a team of additional experienced investment professionals who, collectively, comprise the CGMSIM Investment Team. CGMSIM may hire additional investment professionals to provide services to GMS Finance.

Investment Strategy and Approach

Our investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation primarily through debt investments in U.S. middle market companies. We seek to achieve our investment objective by investing primarily in Middle Market Senior Loans of private U.S. middle market companies and opportunistically pursuing investments with high risk-adjusted returns across the capital structure and company size depending on broader market conditions. We seek to generate strong risk-adjusted net returns by assembling a diversified portfolio of investments across a broad range of industries and instruments.

We target U.S. middle market companies, generally controlled by private equity investment firms that require capital for growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations, refinancings and leveraged buyouts. We may also make opportunistic loans to independently owned and publicly held middle market companies. We seek to partner with strong management teams executing long-term growth strategies. Target businesses typically exhibit some or all of the following characteristics:

EBITDA of $10—$100 million;

Minimum of 35% original sponsor cash equity;

Sustainable leading positions in their respective markets;

Scalable revenues and operating cash flow;

Experienced management teams with successful track records;

Stable, predictable cash flows with low technology and market risks;

Diversified product offering and customer base;

Low capital expenditures requirements;

A North American base of operations;

Strong customer relationships;

Products, services or distribution channels having distinctive competitive advantages; and

Defensible niche strategy or other barriers to entry.

While we believe that the criteria listed above are important in identifying and investing in prospective portfolio companies, not all of these criteria will be necessarily met by each prospective portfolio company. In addition, we may change our investment objective and/or investment criteria over time without notice to or consent from our investors.

Portfolio Composition

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of our investments was approximately $1,052.7 million and $698.7 million, respectively, in 85 and 72 portfolio companies/structured finance obligations, respectively. The type, geography and industry composition of investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated as a percentage of fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was each as follows:

   As of December 31, 

Type—% of Fair Value

  2015  2014 

First Lien Debt

   75.53  73.68

Second Lien Debt

   19.98    15.44  

Structured Finance Obligations

   4.26    10.88  

Equity Investments

   0.23    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100.00  100.00
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   As of December 31, 

Geography—% of Fair Value

  2015  2014 

Cayman Islands

   4.26  10.52

Ireland

   0.93    1.70  

United Kingdom

   2.14    3.51  

United States

   92.67    84.27  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100.00  100.00
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   As of December 31, 

Industry—% of Fair Value

  2015  2014 

Aerospace and Defense

   6.02  8.59

Automotive

   5.02    3.37  

Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate

   13.24    4.09  

Business Services

   12.38    9.06  

Capital Equipment

   1.71    1.42  

Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber

   2.46    2.36  

Construction & Building

   1.90    2.58  

Consumer Services

   4.82    5.94  

Containers, Packaging & Glass

   5.24    4.02  

Durable Consumer Goods

   1.94    4.57  

Energy: Electricity

   3.51    1.19  

Energy: Oil & Gas

   1.08    1.74  

Environmental Industries

   1.10    2.98  

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

   6.09    7.64  

High Tech Industries

   4.73    5.25  

Hotel, Gaming & Leisure

   2.97    1.23  

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing

   1.96    0.96  

Metals & Mining

   0.97    1.47  

Non-durable Consumer Goods

   3.85    3.73  

Retail

   2.29    1.83  

Software

   1.33    3.95  

Structured Finance

   4.26    10.88  

Telecommunications

   6.72    4.01  

Transportation: Cargo

   1.82    2.79  

Transportation: Consumer

   0.89    1.57  

Utilities: Electric

   0.54    0.84  

Wholesale

   1.16    1.94  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   100.00  100.00
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See the Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 in our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information on these investments, including a list of companies and type, cost and fair value of investments.

Investment Process—Middle Market Senior Loans

We view our investment process as consisting of four distinct phases described below:

Origination. Our Investment Adviser sources middle market investment opportunities through the CGMSIM Investment Team’s extensive network of relationships with private equity firms, other middle market senior lenders, and investment and commercial banks. The CGMSIM Investment Team supplements these relationships through personal visits and marketing campaigns focused on maximizing investment deal flow. It is their responsibility to identify specific opportunities, to refine opportunities through candid exploration of the underlying facts and circumstances and to apply creative and flexible thinking to solve clients’ financing needs. The origination personnel are located in New York, Illinois and California. Each originator maintains long-standing relationships with potential sources of deal flow and is responsible for covering a specified target market. We believe those originators’ strength and breadth of relationships across a wide range of markets generate numerous financing opportunities, which should enable our Investment Adviser to be highly selective in recommending investments.

Credit Evaluation. Our Investment Adviser utilizes a systematic, consistent approach to credit evaluation with a particular focus on an acceptable level of debt repayment and deleveraging under a “base case” set of projections, which we refer to as the “Base Case,” which typically reflects a more conservative estimate than the set of projections provided by a prospective portfolio company, which we refer to as the “Management Case.” In addition, our Investment Adviser leverages the industry-specific expertise within the GMS platform. Our Investment Adviser has access to 11 GMS Structured Credit research analysts who cover approximately 20 industries and advise GMS’ CLO funds. The key criteria that our Investment Adviser considers include (i) strong and resilient underlying business fundamentals, (ii) a substantial equity cushion in the form of capital ranking junior in right of payment to our investment and (iii) a conclusion that the overall Base Case and in some cases a “downside case” allows for adequate debt repayment and deleveraging. Our Investment Adviser focuses on the criteria for evaluating prospective portfolio companies discussed above under “Competitive Strengths.” In evaluating a particular company, our Investment Adviser puts more emphasis on credit considerations (such as (i) debt repayment and deleveraging under a Base Case set of projections, (ii) the ability of the company to maintain a modest liquidity cushion under a Base Case set of projections, and (iii) the ability of the company to service its fixed charge obligations under a Base Case set of projections) than on profit potential and loan pricing. Our Investment Adviser’s due diligence process for middle market credits typically entails:

a thorough review of historical and pro forma financial information;

on-site visits;

meetings with management;

a review of loan documents and material contracts;

third-party “quality of earnings” accounting due diligence;

when appropriate, background checks on key managers;

third-party research relating to the company’s business, industry, markets, products and services and competitors;

the commission of third-party market studies when appropriate; and

sensitivity of Management Case projections

Execution. In executing transactions for us, our Investment Adviser applies a thorough, consistent approach to credit evaluation, and maintains discipline with respect to credit, pricing and structure to ensure the ultimate

success of the financing. Upon completion of due diligence, the investment professionals working on a proposed portfolio investment deliver a memorandum to the CGMSIM Investment Committee. Once an investment has been approved by a majority of the CGMSIM Investment Committee, including an affirmative vote by the Chairman of the CGMSIM Investment Committee or his designee, it moves through a series of steps, including initial documentation using standard document templates and the establishment of negotiating boundaries, final documentation, including resolution of business points and the execution of original documents held in escrow. Upon completion of final documentation, a loan is funded after execution of a final closing memorandum.

Monitoring. We view active portfolio monitoring as a vital part of our investment process. We consider regular dialogue with company management and sponsors as well as detailed, internally generated monitoring reports to be critical to our performance. Our Investment Adviser has implemented a monitoring template designed to reasonably ensure compliance with these standards. This template is used as a tool by our Investment Adviser to assess investment performance relative to plan. In addition, our portfolio companies may rely on us to provide them with financial and capital markets expertise.

As part of the monitoring process, our Investment Adviser has developed risk policies pursuant to which it regularly assesses the risk profile of each of our debt investments and rates each of them based on the following categories, which we refer to as “Internal Risk Ratings”:

Internal Risk Ratings Definitions

Rating

Definition

1Performing—Low Risk: Borrower is operating more than 10% ahead of the Base Case.
2Performing—Stable Risk: Borrower is operating within 10% of the Base Case (above or below). This is the initial rating assigned to all new borrowers.
3Performing—Management Notice: Borrower is operating more than 10% below the Base Case. A financial covenant default may have occurred, but there is a low risk of payment default.
4Watch List: Borrower is operating more than 20% below the Base Case and there is a high risk of covenant default, or it may have already occurred. Payments are current although subject to greater uncertainty, and there is moderate to high risk of payment default.
5Watch List—Possible Loss: Borrower is operating more than 30% below the Base Case. At the current level of operations and financial condition, the borrower does not have the ability to service and ultimately repay or refinance all outstanding debt on current terms. Payment default is very likely or may have occurred. Loss of principal is possible.
6Watch List—Probable Loss: Borrower is operating more than 40% below the Base Case, and at the current level of operations and financial condition, the borrower does not have the ability to service and ultimately repay or refinance all outstanding debt on current terms. Payment default is very likely or may have already occurred. Additionally, the prospects for improvement in the borrower’s situation are sufficiently negative that impairment of some or all principal is probable.

Our Investment Adviser has developed a risk rating model that is based on evaluating portfolio company performance in comparison to the Base Case when considering certain credit metrics including, but not limited to, adjusted EBITDA and net senior leverage as well as specific events including, but not limited to, default and impairment.

Our Investment Adviser monitors and, when appropriate, changes the investment ratings assigned to each debt investment in our portfolio. In connection with our quarterly valuation process, our Investment Adviser reviews our investment ratings on a regular basis. The following table summarizes the Internal Risk Ratings as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

   December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
   Fair Value   % of Fair Value  Fair Value   % of Fair Value 
(dollar amounts in millions)               

Internal Risk Rating 1

  $71.2     7.08 $55.6     8.93

Internal Risk Rating 2

   809.7     80.54    517.1     83.04  

Internal Risk Rating 3

   112.3     11.17    41.0     6.58  

Internal Risk Rating 4

   12.2     1.21    9.0     1.45  

Internal Risk Rating 5

   —        —       —    

Internal Risk Rating 6

   —        —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,005.4     100.00 $622.7     100.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the weighted average Internal Risk Rating of our debt investment portfolio was 2.1 and 2.0, respectively.

Investment Process—Opportunistic Investments

For opportunistic investments, our Investment Adviser seeks to leverage the GMS platform to identify investments that fit our investment mandate. We use the proprietary deal flow generated by the GMS platform to enhance portfolio returns. Our Investment Adviser’s evaluation of structured finance obligations for investment opportunities begins with due diligence. The due diligence focuses on appropriate factors, such as the manager, underlying assets, ratings, structure and key risks. Information is derived from a number of sources, including third-party structured finance analysis platforms. The structured finance obligations deal committee reviews and approves each deal. The structured finance obligations deal committee includes a majority of the members of the CGMSIM Investment Committee and is chaired by Mr. Petrick, the Chairman of the CGMSIM Investment Committee, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Head of GMS. As part of our monitoring process, our Investment Adviser has developed risk policies pursuant to which it regularly assesses the risk profile of each of the structured finance obligation investments.

Election to be Taxed as a RIC

The Company has elected to be treated, and intends to continuemake the required distributions to comply with the requirements to qualify annually, as a RIC under the Code. As a RIC, we generally do not have to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any income that we distribute to ourits stockholders as dividends. Tospecified therein. In order to qualify as a RIC, wethe Company must among other things, meet certain minimum distribution, source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. In addition, we mustIf such requirements are met, then the Company is generally required to pay income taxes only on the portion of its taxable income and gains it does not distribute.

The minimum distribution requirements applicable to RICs require the Company to distribute to ourits stockholders for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investmentits investment company taxable income” which is generally our net ordinary taxable income plus (“ICTI”), as defined by the Code, each year. Depending on the level of ICTI earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward ICTI in excess of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses (the “Annual Distribution Requirement”). The following discussion assumescurrent year distributions into the next tax year. Any such carryover ICTI must be distributed before the end of that we qualify asnext tax year through a RIC and have satisfieddividend declared prior to filing the Annual Distribution Requirement.

If we:

qualify as a RIC; and

satisfyfinal tax return related to the Annual Distribution Requirement,year which generated such ICTI.

then we are not

In addition, based on the excise distribution requirements, the Company is subject to U.S.a 4% nondeductible federal incomeexcise tax on undistributed income unless the portion of our net taxable income we distribute (or are deemed to distribute) to stockholders. We are subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates on any income or capital gains not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders.

In addition, if we fail to distributeCompany distributes in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of ourits ordinary income for theeach calendar year, (2) 98.2% of our capital gain net income (both long-term and short-term) for



the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in the preceding year (the “Excise Tax Distribution Requirements”), we are liable for a 4% excise tax on the portion of the undistributed amounts of such income that are less than the amounts required to be distributed based on the Excise Tax Distribution Requirements.year. For this purpose, however, any ordinary income or capital gain net income retained by usthe Company that is subject to corporate income tax for the tax year ending in that calendar year is considered to have been distributed by year end (or earlier if estimated taxes are paid). We currently intenddistributed. The Company intends to make sufficient distributions each taxable year to satisfy the Excise Tax Distribution Requirements.

In orderexcise distribution requirements.

The Company evaluates tax positions taken or expected to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:

continue to qualify as a BDC under the Investment Company Act at all times during each taxable year;

derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to loans of certain securities, gains from the sale of stock or other securities or foreign currencies, net income from certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities or foreign currencies (the “90% Gross Income Test”); and

diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year:

at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities if such other securities of any one issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and

no more than 25% of the value of our assets is investedbe taken in the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securitiescourse of other RICs, of one issuer, or two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable Code rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses, or of certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships” (the “Diversification Tests”).

Moreover, our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of our portfolio and/or (2) other requirements relating to our qualification as a RIC, including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the Excise Tax Distribution Requirements, we may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous. If we are prohibited from making distributions or are unable to raise additional debt or equity capital or sell assets to make distributions, we may not be able to make sufficient distributions to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, and therefore would not be able to maintain our qualification as a RIC. Additionally, we may make investments that result in the recognition of ordinary income rather than capital gain, or that prevent us from accruing a long-term holding period. These investments may prevent us from making capital gain distributions as described below. We intend to monitor our transactions, make the appropriate tax elections and make the appropriate entries in our books and records when we make any such investments in order to mitigate the effect of these rules.

A RIC is limited inpreparing its ability to deduct expenses in excess of its “investment company taxable income” (which is, generally, ordinary income plus net realized short-term capital gains in excess of net realized long-term capital losses). If our expenses in a given year exceed gross taxable income, we would have a net operating loss for that year. However, a RIC is not permitted to carry forward net operating losses to subsequent years. In addition, expenses can be used only to offset investment company taxable income, not net capital gain. Due to these limits on the deductibility of expenses, we may for U.S. federal income tax purposes have aggregate taxable income for several years that we distribute and that is taxable to our stockholders even if such income is greater than the aggregate net income we actually earned during those years. Such distributions may be made

from our cash assets or by liquidation of investments, if necessary. We may realize gains or losses from such liquidations. In the event we realize net capital gains from such transactions, a holder may receive a larger capital gain distribution than the holder would have received in the absence of such transactions.

Our Regulatory Structure—Regulation as a Business Development Company

General

A BDC is regulated under the Investment Company Act. A BDC must be organized in the United States for the purpose of investing in or lending to primarily private companies and making significant managerial assistance available to them. A BDC may use capital provided by public stockholders and from other sources to make long-term, private investments in businesses. A publicly-traded BDC provides stockholders the ability to retain the liquidity of a publicly traded stock while sharing in the possible benefits, if any, of investing in primarily privately owned companies. Until a Qualified IPO, we do not intend to list our common stock on a stock exchange and it will not be publicly traded.

We may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC unless authorized by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities, as required by the Investment Company Act. A majority of the outstanding voting securities of a company is defined under the Investment Company Act as the lesser of: (a) 67% or more of such company’s voting securities present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company are present or represented by proxy, or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company. We do not anticipate any substantial change in the nature of our business.

As with other companies regulated by the Investment Company Act, a BDC must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. A majority of our directors must be persons who are not interested persons, as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act. Additionally, we are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect the BDC. Furthermore, as a BDC, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to us or our stockholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.

As a BDC, we are generally required to meet an asset coverage ratio, defined under the Investment Company Act as the ratio of our total assets (less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities) to our outstanding senior securities, of at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. We may also be prohibited under the Investment Company Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC. As a BDC, we are generally limited in our ability to invest in any portfolio company in which our Investment Adviser or any of its affiliates currently has an investment or to make any co-investments with our Investment Adviser or its affiliates without an exemptive order from the SEC, subject to certain exceptions.

We do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the Investment Company Act. Under these limits, except for registered money market funds, we generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of any investment company, invest more than 5% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one investment company or invest more than 10% of the value of our total assets in the securities of investment companies in the aggregate. The portion of our portfolio invested in securities issued by investment companies ordinarily will subject our stockholders to additional indirect expenses. Our investment portfolio is also subject to diversification requirements by virtue of our intended status to be a RIC for U.S. tax purposes. See Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Structure” for more information.

In addition, investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act and private funds that are excluded from the definition of “investment company” pursuant to either Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the

Investment Company Act may not acquire directly or through a controlled entity more than 3% of our total outstanding voting stock (measured at the time of the acquisition), unless the funds comply with an exemption under the Investment Company Act. As a result, certain of our investors may hold a smaller position in our shares than if they were not subject to these restrictions.

We are generally not able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. See Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Structure—Regulations governing our operation as a BDC affect our ability to, and the way in which we will, raise additional capital.” We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In addition, we may generally issue new shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value in rights offerings to existing stockholders, in payment of dividends and in certain other limited circumstances.

We will be periodically examined by the SEC for compliance with the Investment Company Act.

As a BDC, we are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. See Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Structure.

Qualifying Assets

We may invest up to 30% of our portfolio opportunistically in “non-qualifying assets,” which will be driven primarily through opportunities sourced through the GMS platform. However, under the Investment Company Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than assets of the type listed in Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act, which are referred to as “qualifying assets,” unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the BDC’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our proposed business are the following:

(1)Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the Investment Company Act as any issuer which:

(a)is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;

(b)is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the BDC) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the Investment Company Act; and

(c)satisfies any of the following:

i.does not have any class of securities that is traded on a national securities exchange;

ii.has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;

iii.is controlled by a BDC or a group of companies including a BDC and the BDC has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company; or

iv.is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4.0 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2.0 million.

(2)Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we control.

(3)

Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities, was

unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements.

(4)Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company.

(5)Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities.

(6)Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.

Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies

A BDC must have been organized under the laws of, and have its principal place of business in, any state or states within the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) above. However, in order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, the BDC must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance; except that, where the BDC purchases such securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available managerial assistance means, among other things, any arrangement whereby the BDC, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.

Temporary Investments

Pending investment in other types of “qualifying assets,” as described above, our investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment, which we refer to, collectively, as “temporary investments,” so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. We may also invest in U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements. However, if more than 25% of our gross assets constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we would not meet the diversification tests in order to qualify as a RIC. Thus, we do not intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this limit. Our Investment Adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.

Senior Securities

We are permitted, under specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of stock senior to our common stock if our asset coverage, as defined in the Investment Company Act, is at least equal to 200% immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our stockholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. We may also borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for temporary or emergency purposes without regard to asset coverage.

Code of Ethics

We and CGMSIM have each adopted a code of ethics pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act and Rule 204A-1 under the Advisers Act, respectively, that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain transactions by our personnel. Our codes of ethics generally do not permit investments by our and CGMSIM’s personnel in securities that may be purchased or sold by us.

Compliance Policies and Procedures

We and CGMSIM have each adopted and implemented written policies and procedures reasonably designed to detect and prevent violation of the federal securities laws and are required to review these compliance policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation and designate a Chief Compliance Officer to be responsible for administering the policies and procedures.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) imposes a wide variety of new regulatory requirements on publicly-held companies and their insiders. Many of these requirements affect us. For example:

pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our President and Chief Financial Officer must certify the accuracy of theconsolidated financial statements contained in our periodic reports;

pursuant to Item 307 of Regulation S-K, our periodic reports must disclose our conclusions about the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures;

pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act, our management must prepare a report regarding its assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and, starting from the date on which we cease to be an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act, must obtain an audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting performed by our independent registered public accounting firm; and

pursuant to Item 308 of Regulation S-K and Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act, our periodic reports must disclose whether there were significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to material weaknesses.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our current policies and procedures to determine whether we complythe tax positions are “more-likely than not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. All penalties and interest associated with income taxes, if any, are included in income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred $264, $76 and $0, respectively, in excise tax expense.

The SPV and the 2015-1 Issuer are disregarded entities for tax purposes and are consolidated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to our Investment Adviser, CGMSIM. The proxy voting policies and procedures of CGMSIM are set forth below. These guidelines are reviewed periodically by CGMSIM and our directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in Section 2(a)(19)tax return of the Investment Company Act (“Independent Directors”),Company.


Dividends and accordingly, are subjectDistributions to change.

An investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of its clients. As part of this duty, CGMSIM recognizes that it must vote portfolio securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of its clients.

These policies and procedures for voting proxies are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.

CGMSIM will vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in what CGMSIM perceives to be the best interest of our stockholders. CGMSIM will review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a stockholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by us. Although CGMSIM will generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our portfolio securities, CGMSIM may vote for such a proposal if there exist compelling long-term reasons to do so.

CGMSIM’s proxy voting decisions will be made by the CGMSIM Investment Committee. To ensure that the vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, CGMSIM will require that: (1) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to the CGMSIM Investment Committee, and Independent Directors, any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (2) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how CGMSIM intends to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.

Privacy Principles

We are committed to maintaining the privacy of our stockholders and to safeguarding their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help investors understand what personal information we collect, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may share information with select other parties.

Pursuant to our privacy policy, we do not disclose any non-public personal information concerning any of our stockholders who are individuals unless the disclosure meets certain permitted exceptions under Regulation S-P. We generally do not use or disclose any stockholder information for any purpose other than as required by law.

We may collect non-public information about investors from our subscription agreements or other forms, such as name, address, account number and the types and amounts of investments, and information about transactions with us or our affiliates, such as participation in other investment programs, ownership of certain types of accounts or other account data and activity. We may disclose the information that we collect from our stockholders or former stockholders, as described above, only to our affiliates and service providers and only as allowed by applicable law or regulation. Any party that receives this information uses it only for the services required by us and as allowed by applicable law or regulation, and is not permitted to share or use this information for any other purpose. To protect the non-public personal information of individuals, we permit access only by authorized personnel who need access to that information to provide services to us and our stockholders. In order to guard our stockholders’ non-public personal information, we maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that are designed to comply with applicable law. Non-public personal information that we collect about our stockholders is generally stored on secured servers located in the United States. An individual stockholder’s right to privacy extends to all forms of contact with us, including telephone, written correspondence and electronic media, such as the Internet.

Pursuant to our privacy policy, we provide a clear and conspicuous notice to each investor that details our privacy policies and procedures at the time of the investor’s subscription. We post our privacy policy on our website (http://carlyle.com/our-business/global-market-strategies/carlyle-gms-finance-inc) and promptly update the policy with any amendments.

Reporting Obligations

We furnish our stockholders with annual reports containing audited financial statements, quarterly reports, and such other periodic reports as we determine to be appropriate or as may be required by law. We are required to comply with all periodic reporting, proxy solicitation and other applicable requirements under the Exchange Act.

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, as well as reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 regarding directors, officers or 10% beneficial owners of us, filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a), 15(d) or 16(a) of the Exchange Act, are available on our website (http://carlyle.com/our-business/global-market-strategies/carlyle-gms-finance-inc).

Common Stockholders and the public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains such information.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Potential investors should be aware that an investment in the Company involves a high degree of risk. There can be no assurance that the Company’s investment objectives will be achieved or that an investor will receive a return of its capital. In addition, there will be occasions when the Adviser and its affiliates may encounter potential conflicts of interest in connection with the Company. The following considerations, in addition to the considerations set forth elsewhere herein, should be carefully evaluated before making an investment in the Company.

Risks Related to Economic Conditions

Capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. These market conditions may materially and adversely affect debt and equity capital markets in the United States and abroad, which may in the future have a negative impact on our business and operations.

From time to time, capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. For example, between 2007 and 2009, the global capital markets experienced an extended period of disruption as evidenced by a lack of liquidity in the debt capital markets, write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk and the failure of certain major financial institutions. Despite actions of the United States, federal government and foreign governments, these events contributed to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impacted the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular. While market conditions have experienced relative stability in recent years, there have been continuing periods of volatility such as that experienced during the first quarter of 2016 and there can be no assurance that adverse market conditions will not repeat themselves in the future. During such periods of market disruption and instability, we and other companies in the financial services sector may have limited access, if available, to alternative markets for debt and equity capital. Equity capital may be difficult to raise to the extent we complete an initial public offering and commence trading on an exchange because, subject to some limited exceptions which will apply to us, as a BDC we will generally not be able to issue additional shares of our common stock at a price less than net asset value. In addition, our ability to incur indebtedness (including by issuing preferred stock) is limited by applicable regulations such that our asset coverage, as defined in the Investment Company Act, must equal at least 200% immediately after each time we incur indebtedness. The debt capital that will be available, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions in the future. Any inability to raise capital could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Given the extreme volatility and dislocation in the capital markets over the past several years, many BDCs have faced, and may in the future face, a challenging environment in which to raise or access capital. In addition, significant changes in the capital markets, including the extreme volatility and disruption over the past several years, has had, and may in the future have, a negative effect on the valuations of our investments and on the potential for liquidity events involving these investments. While most of our investments are not publicly traded, applicable accounting standards require us to assume as part of our valuation process that our investments are sold in a principal market to market participants (even if we plan on holding an investment through its maturity). As a result, volatility in the capital markets can adversely affect our investment valuations. Further, the illiquidity

of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if required and to value such investments. As a result, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we will have recorded our investments. In addition, significant changes in the capital markets may have a negative effect on the valuations of our investments and on the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. An inability to raise capital, and any required sale of our investments for liquidity purposes, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States and of several countries in the European Union (EU) and China could have a significant adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Due to federal budget deficit concerns, S&P downgraded the federal government’s credit rating from AAA to AA+ for the first time in history on August 5, 2011. Further downgrades or warnings by S&P or other rating agencies, and the United States government’s credit and deficit concerns in general, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact both the perception of credit risk associated with our debt portfolio and our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. In addition, a decreased U.S. government credit rating could create broader financial turmoil and uncertainty, which may weigh heavily on our financial performance and the value of our common stock.

In 2010, a financial crisis emerged in Europe, triggered by high budget deficits and rising direct and contingent sovereign debt in Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain, which created concerns about the ability of these nations to continue to service their sovereign debt obligations. While the financial stability of such countries has improved significantly, risks resulting from any future debt crisis in Europe or any similar crisis could have a detrimental impact on the global economic recovery, sovereign and non-sovereign debt in these countries and the financial condition of European financial institutions. Market and economic disruptions have affected, and may in the future affect, consumer confidence levels and spending, personal bankruptcy rates, levels of incurrence and default on consumer debt and home prices, among other factors. We cannot assure you that market disruptions in Europe, including the increased cost of funding for certain governments and financial institutions, will not impact the global economy, and we cannot assure you that assistance packages will be available, or if available, be sufficient to stabilize countries and markets in Europe or elsewhere affected by a financial crisis.

To the extent uncertainty regarding any economic recovery in Europe negatively impacts consumer confidencethat the Company has taxable income available, the Company intends to make quarterly distributions to its common stockholders. Dividends and consumer credit factors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

In the second quarter of 2015, stock prices in China experienced a significant drop, resulting primarily from continued sell-off of shares trading in Chinese markets. In August 2015, Chinese authorities sharply devalued China’s currency. These market and economic disruptions affected, and may in the future affect, the U.S. capital markets, which could adversely affect our business.

In October 2014, the Federal Reserve announced that it was concluding its bond-buying program, or quantitative easing, which was designeddistributions to stimulate the economy and expand the Federal Reserve’s holdings of long-term securities, suggesting that key economic indicators, such as the unemployment rate, had showed signs of improvement since the inception of the program. It is unclear what effect, if any, the conclusion of the Federal Reserve’s bond-buying program will havecommon stockholders are recorded on the value of our investments. However, it is possible that, without quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, these developments, along with the United States government’s credit and deficit concerns and the European sovereign debt crisis, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. Additionally, in December 2015, the Federal Reserve raised the target range for the federal funds rate. However, if key economic indicators, such as the unemployment rate or inflation, do not progress at a rate consistent with the Federal Reserve’s objectives, the target range for the federal funds rate may change and cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms.

Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.

Many of the portfolio companies in which we make investments may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay the loans we made to them during these periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets may increase and the value of our portfolio may decrease during these periods as we are required to record our investments at their current fair value. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our and our portfolio companies’ funding costs, limit our and our portfolio companies’ access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us or our portfolio companies. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, acceleration of the time when the loans are due and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize the portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt that we hold. We may incur additional expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we will actually provide significant managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors.

Capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability; as a result, we may be unable to launch or complete a Qualified IPO of our common stock or list our shares on a recognized exchange.

From time to time, the U.S. and global capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. While market conditions have experienced relative stability in recent years, there have been continuing periods of volatility such as that experienced during the first quarter of 2016 and there can be no assurance that adverse market conditions will not repeat themselves or worsen in the future. A prolonged period of market illiquidity may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Unfavorable economic conditions could also increase our portfolio companies’ funding costs, limit their access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to them. These events could limit our investment originations, limit their ability to grow, negatively impact our operating results, and delay or prevent us from launching or completing a Qualified IPO of our common stock or listing our shares on a recognized exchange.

Risks Related to Our Business and Structure

CGMSIM, the CGMSIM Investment Team, Carlyle and our Directors and Executive Officers have limited prior experience managing a BDC.

Our Adviser was organized in February 2012 and has a limited operating history. Additionally, our Adviser, the members of the CGMSIM Investment Team, Carlyle and our Directors and Executive Officers have limited prior experience managing the Company, and the investment philosophy and techniques used by our Investment Adviser to manage an SEC-reporting company may differ from the investment philosophy and techniques previously employed by the investment team in identifying and managing past investments. Accordingly, we can offer no assurance that we will replicate the historical performance of other businesses or companies with which the CGMSIM Investment Team has been affiliated, and our investment returns could be substantially lower than the returns achieved by such other companies.

Our financial condition and results of operations depend on our ability to manage future growth effectively.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective and to grow depends on our Investment Adviser’s ability to identify, invest in and monitor companies that meet our investment criteria.

Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our Investment Adviser’s structuring of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and its ability to access financing for us on acceptable terms.date. The CGMSIM Investment Team has substantial responsibilities under the Investment Advisory Agreement, has substantial responsibilities in connection with managing NFIC, and may also be called upon to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies. However, we can offer no assurance that any such investment professionals will contribute effectively to the work of the Investment Adviser. Any failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may need to raise additional capital to grow because we must distribute most of our income.

We may need additional capital to fund growth in our investments. We have issued and expect to issue additional equity securities in connection with the private offering of our shares of common stock to investors in reliance on exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and other applicable securities laws (the “Private Offering”) and expect to continue to borrow from financial institutions. A reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to our stockholders to maintain our RIC status. As a result, any such cash earnings may not be available to fund investment originations. We have borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility, the Facility and through the issuance of the 2015-1 Notes and in the future may borrow under additional debt facilities from financial institutions and issue additional debt and equity securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from other sources to fund our investments, it could limit our ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the value of our securities. In addition, as a BDC, our ability to borrow or issue preferred stock may be restricted if our total assets are less than 200% of our total borrowings and preferred stock.

Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a BDC or RIC would reduce our operating flexibility, may hinder our achievement of our investment objective, may limit our investment choices and may subject us to greater regulation.

The Investment Company Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of BDCs. For example, BDCs are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets in specified types of “qualifying assets,” primarily in private U.S. companies or thinly-traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. In addition, subject to certain limited exceptions, an investment in an issuer that has outstanding securities listed on a national exchange may be treated as a qualifying asset only if such issuer has a market capitalization that is less than $250 million at the time of such investment. In addition, as a RIC we are required to satisfy certain source-of-income, diversification and distribution requirements. These constraints, among others, may hinder our ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and to achieve our investment objective.

Furthermore, any failure to comply with the requirements imposed on BDCs by the Investment Company Act could cause the SEC to bring an enforcement action against us and/or expose us to claims of private litigants. In addition, upon approval of a majority of our stockholders, we may elect to withdraw our status as a BDC. If we decide to withdraw our election, or if we otherwise fail to qualify, or maintain our qualification, as a BDC, we may be subject to substantially greater regulation under the Investment Company Act as a closed-end investment company. Compliance with such regulations would significantly decrease our operating flexibility, and could significantly increase our cost of doing business.

Regulations governing our operation as a BDC affect our ability to, and the way in which we will, raise additional capital. As a BDC, the necessity of raising additional capital may expose us to risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage.

We may issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the

Investment Company Act. Under the provisions of the Investment Company Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to issue senior securities in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the Investment Company Act, equals at least 200% of total assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. Also, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness would not be available for distributions to our common stockholders. Furthermore, as a result of issuing senior securities, our common stockholders would also be exposed to typical risks associated with increased leverage, including an increased risk of loss resulting from increased indebtedness.

If we issue preferred stock, the preferred stock would rank “senior” to common stock in our capital structure, preferred stockholders would have separate voting rights on certain matters and might have other rights, preferences, or privileges more favorable than those of our common stockholders, and the issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest.

We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value per share of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of us and our stockholders and our stockholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price that, in the determination of our Board of Directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). We do not presently intend to issue our common stock at a price below the then-current net asset value per share of our common stock in connection with the Private Offering. If we raise additional funds by issuing more common stock, including in connection with a Qualified IPO, or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, then the percentage ownership of our stockholders at that time will decrease, and holders of our common stock might experience dilution.

We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.

As part of our business strategy, we, including through our wholly-owned subsidiaries, borrow from and may in the future issue additional senior debt securities to banks, insurance companies and other lenders. Holders of these loans or senior securities would have fixed-dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our stockholders. If the value of our assets decreases, leverage will cause our net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have without leverage. Similarly, any decrease in our income would cause our net income to decline more sharply than it would have if we had not borrowed. This decline could negatively affect our ability to make dividend payments on our common stock. Our ability to service our borrowings depends largely on our financial performance and is subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. In addition, the management fees are payable based on our gross assets, including cash and assets acquired through the use of leverage, which may give our Adviser an incentive to use leverage to make additional investments. See“—We may be obligated to pay our Investment Adviser even if we incur a loss.” The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our Investment Adviser’s and our Board of Directors’ assessment of market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain credit at all or on terms acceptable to us.

Our Revolving Credit Facility, Facility and 2015-1 Notes also impose financial and operating covenants that restrict our business activities, remedies on default and similar matters. As of December 31, 2015, we are in compliance with the covenants of our Revolving Credit Facility, Facility and 2015-1 Notes. However, our continued compliance with these covenants depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, although we believe we will continue to be in compliance, we cannot assure you that we will

continue to comply with the covenants in our Revolving Credit Facility, Facility and 2015-1 Notes. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default. If we were unable to obtain a waiver of a default from the lenders or holders of that indebtedness, as applicable, those lenders or holders could accelerate repayment under that indebtedness. An acceleration could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Lastly, we may be unable to obtain additional leverage, which would, in turn, affect our return on capital.

As of December 31, 2015, we had $507.3 million of outstanding consolidated indebtedness, which would have an annualized interest cost of 2.41% under the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, Facility and 2015-1 Notes, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of upfront fees), to the extent the amount remains outstanding. Since we generally pay interest at a floating rate on our Revolving Credit Facility, Facility and 2015-1 Notes, an increase in interest rates will generally increase our borrowing costs. We expect that our annualized interest cost and returns required to cover interest will increase after we issue debt securities.

Changes in interest rates may increase our cost of capital, reduce the ability of our portfolio companies to service their debt obligations and decrease our net investment income.

General interest rate fluctuations and changes in credit spreads on floating rate loans may have a substantial negative impact on our investments and investment opportunities and, accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our rate of return on invested capital, our net investment income and our net asset value. Substantially all of our debt investments will have variable interest rates that reset periodically based on benchmarks such as LIBOR and the prime rate, so an increase in interest rates from their historically low present levels may make it more difficult for our portfolio companies to service their obligations under the debt investments that we will hold. In addition, to the extent we borrow money to make investments, our net investment income depends, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income to the extent we use debt to finance our investments. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which could reduce our net investment income.

In addition, a rise in the general level of interest rates can be expected to lead to higher interest rates applicable to our debt investments. Accordingly, an increase in interest rates would make it easier for us to meet or exceed the incentive fee hurdle rate and may result in a substantial increase of the amount of incentive fees payable to our Investment Adviser with respect to our pre-incentive fee net investment income.

Our portfolio companies may prepay loans, which may have the effect of reducing our investment income if the returned capital cannot be invested in transactions with equal or greater yields.

Loans are generally callable at any time, most of them at no premium to par. We are generally unable to predict the rate and frequency of such repayments. Whether a loan is called will depend both on the continued positive performance of the portfolio company and the existence of favorable financing market conditions that allow such portfolio company the ability to replace existing financing with less expensive capital. As market conditions change frequently, we will often be unable to predict when, and if, this may be possible for each of our portfolio companies. In the case of some of these loans, having the loan called early may have the effect of reducing our actual investment income below our expected investment income if the capital returned cannot be invested in transactions with equal or greater yields.

The financial projections of our portfolio companies could prove inaccurate.

We generally evaluate the capital structure of portfolio companies on the basis of financial projections prepared by the management of such portfolio companies. These projected operating results are normally based primarily on judgments of the management of the portfolio companies. In all cases, projections are only estimates of future results that are based upon assumptions made at the time that the projections are developed. General

economic conditions, which are not predictable with accuracy, along with other factors may cause actual performance to fall short of the financial projections that were used to establish a given portfolio company’s capital structure. Because of the leverage that is typically employed by our portfolio companies, this could cause a substantial decrease in the value of our investment in the portfolio company. The inaccuracy of financial projections could thus cause our performance to fall short of our expectations.

Our portfolio securities typically do not have a readily available market price and, in such a case, we will value these securities at fair value as determined in good faith under procedures adopted by our Board of Directors, which valuation is inherently subjective and may not reflect what we may actually realize for the sale of the investment.

Substantially all of our portfolio investments are in the form of debt investments that are not publicly traded. The fair value of these securities is not readily determinable. We value these investments on at least a quarterly basis in accordance with our valuation policy, which is at all times consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). Our Board of Directors utilizes the services of a third-party valuation firm to aid it in determining the fair value of these investments. The Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value in good faith based on the input of our Investment Adviser and the third-party valuation firm. The participation of our Investment Adviser in our valuation process could result in a conflict of interest, since the management fees are based on our gross assets and also because our Investment Adviser is receiving performance-based incentive fees. The factors that are considered in the fair value pricing of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparisons to publicly-traded companies, discounted cash flow, relevant credit market indices, and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private investments and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. In addition, the valuation of these types of securities may result in substantial write-downs and earnings volatility.

Our net asset value as of a particular date may be materially greater than or less than the value that would be realized if our assets were to be liquidated as of such date. For example, if we were required to sell a certain asset or all or a substantial portion of its assets on a particular date, the actual price that we would realize upon the disposition of such asset or assets could be materially less than the value of such asset or assets as reflected in our net asset value. Volatile market conditions could also cause reduced liquidity in the market for certain assets, which could result in liquidation values that are materially less than the values of such assets as reflected in our net asset value.

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.

We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including the interest rate payable on the debt securities we acquire, the default rate on such securities, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses and changes in unrealized appreciation or depreciation, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

There are significant potential conflicts of interest, including the management of NFIC and other funds affiliated with Carlyle by our Investment Adviser’s key investment professionals, which could impact our investment returns.

Our executive officers and directors, as well as the other current and future principals of our Investment Adviser, CGMSIM, may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do. Currently, our executive officers, as well as the other principals of our Investment Adviser, CGMSIM, manage other funds affiliated with Carlyle. In addition, the CGMSIM Investment Team has

responsibilities for sourcing and managing U.S. middle market debt investments for NFIC. Accordingly, they have obligations to investors in NFIC, the fulfillment of which obligations may not be in the best interests of, or may be adverse to the interests of, us or our stockholders.

In addition, we note that any affiliated investment vehicle currently existing, or formed in the future, and managed by our Investment Adviser or its affiliates, including Carlyle, may, notwithstanding different stated investment objectives, have overlapping investment objectives with our own and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by us. As a result, CGMSIM may face conflicts in allocating investment opportunities between us and such other entities. Although CGMSIM will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, it is possible that, in the future, we may not be given the opportunity to participate in investments made by investment funds managed by our Investment Adviser or an investment manager affiliated with our Investment Adviser, including Carlyle. In any such case, when CGMSIM identifies an investment, it will be forced to choose which investment fund should make the investment.

We and our affiliates may own investments at different levels of a portfolio company’s capital structure or otherwise own different classes of a portfolio company’s securities. Such investments may inherently give rise to conflicts of interest or perceived conflicts of interest between or among the various classes of securities that may be held. Conflicts may also arise because portfolio decisions regarding our portfolio may benefit our affiliates. Our affiliates may pursue or enforce rights with respect to one of our portfolio companies, and those activities may have an adverse effect on us. As a result, prices, availability, liquidity and terms of our investments may be negatively impacted by the activities of our affiliates, and transactions for us may be impaired or effected at prices or terms that may be less favorable than would otherwise have been the case.

Carlyle considers its “One Carlyle” philosophy and the ability of its professionals to communicate and collaborate across funds, industries and geographies one of its significant competitive strengths. As a result of the expansion of its platform into various lines of business in the alternative asset management industry, Carlyle is subject to a number of actual and potential conflicts of interest and subject to greater regulatory oversight than that to which it would otherwise be subject if it had just one line of business. In addition, as Carlyle expands its platform, the allocation of investment opportunities among its investment funds, including us, is expected to become more complex. In addressing these conflicts and regulatory requirements across Carlyle’s various businesses, Carlyle has and may continue to implement certain policies and procedures (for example, information barriers). As a practical matter, the establishment and maintenance of such information barriers means that collaboration between our investment professionals across various platforms or with respect to certain investments may be limited, reducing potential synergies that Carlyle has cultivated across these businesses through its “One Carlyle” approach. In addition, we may come into possession of material non-public information with respect to issuers in which we may be considering making an investment. As a consequence, we may be precluded from providing such information or other ideas to other funds affiliated with Carlyle that benefit from such information. To the extent we or any other funds affiliated with Carlyle fail to appropriately deal with any such conflicts, it could negatively impact our reputation or Carlyle’s reputation and our ability to raise additional funds and the willingness of counterparties to do business with us or result in potential litigation against us. Our communications with Carlyle Corporate Private Equity, Real Asset and Solutions personnel are subject to certain restrictions as set forth in Carlyle’s information barrier policy. In that regard, it is not generally expected the investment personnel involved in our day-to-day affairs will discuss any issuer-specific information with other members of Carlyle outside the GMS group. In addition to the information barriers between GMS and Private Equity, Real Assets and Solutions, there is an information barrier between different fund groups within GMS.

In the ordinary course of business, we may enter into transactions with affiliates and portfolio companies that may be considered related party transactions. In order to ensure that we do not engage in any prohibited transactions with any persons affiliated with us, we have implemented certain policies and procedures whereby certain of our executive officers screen each of our transactions for any possible affiliations between the proposed portfolio investment, us, companies controlled by us, any stockholders that own more than 5% of us

and our employees and directors. We will not enter into any agreements unless and until we are satisfied that doing so will not raise concerns under the Investment Company Act or, if such concerns exist, we have taken appropriate actions to seek Board of Directors review and approval or SEC exemptive relief for such transaction. Our Board of Directors will review these procedures on an annual basis.

In the course of our investing activities, we pay management and incentive fees to CGMSIM and reimburse CGMSIM for certain expenses it incurs in accordance with our Investment Advisory Agreement. As a result, investors in our common stock invest on a “gross” basis and receive distributions on a “net” basis after expenses, resulting in a lower rate of return than an investor might achieve through direct investments. Accordingly, there may be times when the senior management team of CGMSIM has interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict.

We entered into a royalty-free License Agreement with CIM, pursuant to which CIM has granted us a non-exclusive license to use the name “Carlyle.” Under the License Agreement, we have the right to use the “Carlyle” name for so long as CGMSIM or one of its affiliates remains our Investment Adviser. In addition, we pay CGMSFA, an affiliate of CGMSIM, its costs and expenses and our allocable portion of overhead incurred by it in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including, compensation paid to or compensatory distributions received by our officers (including our Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer) and their respective staff who provide services to us, operations staff who provide services to us, and internal audit staff in their role of performing our Sarbanes-Oxley Act internal control assessment. These arrangements create conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors monitors.

The valuation process for certain of our portfolio holdings creates a conflict of interest.

Many of our portfolio investments will, we expect, continue to be made in the form of securities that are not publicly traded. As a result, our Board of Directors determines the fair value of these securities in good faith as described above in“—Our portfolio securities typically do not have a readily available market price and, in such a case, we will value these securities at fair value as determined in good faith under procedures adopted by our Board of Directors, which valuation is inherently subjective and may not reflect what we may actually realize for the sale of the investment.” In connection with that determination, investment professionals of CGMSIM provide our Board of Directors with valuations based upon the most recent portfolio company financial statements available and projected financial results of each portfolio company. In addition, the interested directors on our Board of Directors have an indirect pecuniary interest in CGMSIM. The participation of CGMSIM’s investment professionals in our valuation process, and the indirect pecuniary interest in our Investment Adviser by the interested directors on our Board of Directors, could result in a conflict of interest as CGMSIM’s management fees are based on our gross assets and our incentive fees are based, in part, on unrealized gains and losses.

We may be obligated to pay our Investment Adviser incentive compensation even if we incur a loss.

Our Investment Adviser is entitled to incentive compensation for each calendar quarter in an amount equal to a percentage of the excess of our pre-incentive fee net investment income for that quarter (before deducting incentive compensation) above a performance threshold for that quarter. Our pre-incentive fee net investment income for incentive compensation purposes excludes realized and unrealized capital losses and depreciation that we may incur in the calendar quarter, even if such capital losses or depreciation result in a net loss on our statement of operations for that quarter. Thus, we may be required to pay CGMSIM incentive compensation for a calendar quarter even if there is a decline in the value of our portfolio or we incur a net loss for that quarter, subject to the deferral provisions.

Our fee structure may induce our Investment Adviser to pursue speculative investments and incur leverage, and investors may bear the cost of multiple levels of fees and expenses.

The incentive fees payable by us to CGMSIM may create an incentive for CGMSIM to pursue investments on our behalf that are riskier or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation

arrangement. The incentive fees payable to our Investment Adviser are calculated based on a percentage of our return on invested capital. This may encourage our Investment Adviser to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would impair the value of our common stock. In addition, the Investment Adviser receives the incentive fees based, in part, upon net capital gains realized on our investments. Unlike that portion of the incentive fees based on income, there is no hurdle rate applicable to the portion of the incentive fees based on net capital gains. As a result, the Investment Adviser may have a tendency to invest more capital in investments that are likely to result in capital gains as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during economic downturns.

The “catch-up” portion of the incentive fees may encourage CGMSIM to accelerate or defer interest payable by portfolio companies from one calendar quarter to another, potentially resulting in fluctuations in timing and dividend amounts.

Moreover, because the base management fees payable to our Adviser are payable based on our gross assets, including those assets acquired through the use of leverage, CGMSIM has a financial incentive to incur leverage which may not be consistent with our stockholders’ interests.

We may invest, to the extent permitted by law, in the securities and instruments of other investment companies, including private funds, and, to the extent we so invest, bear our ratable share of any such investment company’s expenses, including management and performance fees. We also remain obligated to pay management and incentive fees to CGMSIM with respect to the assets invested in the securities and instruments of other investment companies. With respect to each of these investments, each of our stockholders bear his or her share of the management and incentive fees of CGMSIM as well as indirectly bearing the management and performance fees and other expenses of any investment companies in which we invest.

We will become subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to qualify and maintain our qualification as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Code.

Although we have elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code for 2013 and intend to continue to elect to be so treated in succeeding tax years, no assurance can be given that we will be able to qualify for and maintain RIC status. To obtain and maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code, we must meet the following annual distribution, income source and asset diversification requirements.

The Annual Distribution Requirement for a RIC will be satisfied if we distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our ordinary taxable income plus the excess of realized net short-term capital gains over realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Because we use debt financing, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the Investment Company Act and financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we could fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.

The income source requirement will be satisfied if we derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to loans of certain securities, gains from the sale of stock or other securities or foreign currencies, net income from certain “qualified publicly traded partnerships,” or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities or foreign currencies.

The asset diversification requirement will be satisfied if we meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each quarter of our taxable year. Failure to meet those requirements may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, and therefore will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses.

If we fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment for any reason or become subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions.

We may have difficulty satisfying the Annual Distribution Requirement in order to qualify and maintain RIC status if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

We may make investments that produce income that is not matched by a corresponding cash receipt by us. Any such income would be treated as income earned by us and therefore would be subject to the distribution requirements of the Code. Such investments may require us to borrow money or dispose of other securities in order to comply with those requirements. However, under the Investment Company Act, we are not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding unless an “asset coverage” test is met. See Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K “Business—Our Regulatory Structure—Regulation as a Business Development Company—Senior Securities.”

If we are prohibited from making distributions or are unable to raise additional debt or equity capital or sell assets to make distributions, we may not be able to make sufficient distributions to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, and therefore would not be able to maintain our qualification as a RIC. Additionally, we may make investments that result in the recognition of ordinary income rather than capital gain, or that prevent us from accruing a long-term holding period. These investments may prevent us from making capital gain distributions.

A portion of our income and fees may not be qualifying income for purposes of the income source requirement.

Some of the income and fees that we may recognize will not satisfy the income source requirement applicable to RICs. In order to ensure that such income and fees do not disqualify us as a RIC for a failure to satisfy such requirement, we may be required to recognize such income and fees indirectly through one or more entities treated as corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such corporations will be required to pay U.S. corporate income tax on their earnings, which ultimately will reduce the amount of income available for distribution.

For any period that we do not qualify as a “publicly offered regulated investment company,” as defined in the Code, stockholders will be taxed as though they received a distribution of some of our expenses.

A “publicly offered regulated investment company” is a RIC whose shares are either (i) continuously offered pursuant to a public offering, (ii) regularly traded on an established securities market or (iii) held by at least 500 persons at all times during the taxable year. We currently do not qualify as a publicly offered RIC; we may qualify as a publicly offered RIC for future taxable years. For any period that we are not a publicly offered RIC, a non-corporate stockholder’s allocable portion of our affected expenses, including our management fees, is treated as an additional distribution to the stockholder and is deductible by such stockholder only to the extent permitted under the limitations described below. For non-corporate stockholders, including individuals, trusts, and estates, significant limitations generally apply to the deductibility of certain expenses of a non-publicly offered RIC, including advisory fees. In particular, these expenses, referred to as miscellaneous itemized deductions, are deductible to an individual only to the extent they exceed 2% of such a stockholder’s adjusted gross income, and are not deductible for alternative minimum tax purposes.

We are subject to risks in using custodians, administrators and other agents.

We depend on the services of custodians, administrators, including State Street, and other agents to carry out certain securities transactions and administrative services for us. In the event of the insolvency of a custodian, we may not be able to recover equivalent assets in full as we will rank among the custodian’s unsecured creditors

in relation to assets which the custodian borrows, lends or otherwise uses. In addition, our cash held with a custodian may not be segregated from the custodian’s own cash, and we therefore may rank as unsecured creditors in relation thereto. The inability to recover assets from the custodian could have a material impact on our performance.

We will expend significant financial and other resources to comply with the requirements of being a public entity.

As a public entity, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These requirements may place a strain on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, which are discussed below. See Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K “Business—Our Regulatory Structure—Regulation as a Business Development Company—Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.” In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls, significant resources and management oversight is required. We will continue to implement procedures, processes, policies and practices for the purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicable to public companies. These activities may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We expect to incur significant additional annual expenses related to these steps and, among other things, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, director fees, reporting requirements of the SEC, transfer agent fees, additional administrative expenses payable to our Administrator to compensate them for hiring additional accounting, legal and administrative personnel, increased auditing and legal fees and similar expenses.

The systems and resources necessary to comply with public company reporting requirements will increase further once we cease to be an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act. As long as we remain an emerging growth company, we intend to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years following an initial public offering, although if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, we would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31.

We are obligated to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting. Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business and the value of our common stock.

We are obligated to maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting, including the internal control evaluation and certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”). We will not be required to comply with all of the requirements under Section 404 until the date we are no longer an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act. Accordingly, our internal controls over financial reporting do not currently meet all of the standards contemplated by Section 404 that we will eventually be required to meet. Specifically, we are required to conduct annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. However, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until the date we are no longer an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act.

If we are not able to implement the applicable requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, our operations, financial reporting or financial results could be adversely affected. Matters impacting our internal controls may cause us to be unable to report our financial information on a timely basis and thereby subject us to adverse regulatory consequences, including sanctions by the SEC, and result in a breach of the covenants under the agreements governing any of our financing arrangements. There could also be a

negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements. Confidence in the reliability of our financial statements could also suffer if we or our independent registered public accounting firm were to report a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. This could materially adversely affect us and lead to a decline in the market price of our common stock, to the extent we have completed a Qualified IPO.

Stockholders may be subject to filing requirements under the Exchange Act as a result of an investment in us.

Because our common stock is registered under the Exchange Act, ownership information for any person who beneficially owns 5% or more of our common stock must be disclosed in a Schedule 13D or other filings with the SEC. Beneficial ownership for these purposesdistributed is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes having voting or investment power over the securities. In some circumstances, investors who choose to reinvest their dividends may see their percentage stake in us increased to more than 5%, thus triggering this filing requirement. Although we provide in our quarterly financial statements the amount of outstanding stock and the amount of the investor’s stock, the responsibility for determining the filing obligation and preparing the filing remains with the investor. In addition, owners of 10% or more of our common stock are subject to reporting obligations under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Certain investors are limited in their ability to make significant investments in us.

Private funds that are excluded from the definition of “investment company” either pursuant to Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act are restricted from acquiring directly or through a controlled entity more than 3% of our total outstanding voting stock (measured at the time of the acquisition). Investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act are also subject to this restriction as well as other limitations under the Investment Company Act that would restrict the amount that they are able to invest in our securities. As a result, certain investors may be precluded from acquiring additional shares, at a time that they might desire to do so.

Stockholders may be subject to the short-swing profits rules under the Exchange Act as a result of an investment in us.

Persons with the right to appoint a director or who hold 10% or more of a class of our shares may be subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, which recaptures for the benefit of the issuer profits from the purchase and sale of registered stock within a six-month period.

Investors in the Private Offering are subject to transfer restrictions.

Prior to the completion of a Qualified IPO, investors who participate in the Private Offering may not sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of (in each case, a “Transfer”) any common stock unless (i) we give consent and (ii) the Transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws. No Transfer will be effectuated except by registration of the Transfer on our books. Each transferee must agree to be bound by these restrictions and all other obligations as an investor in us. Following completion of a Qualified IPO, investors will be restricted from selling or disposing of their shares of common stock contractually by a lock-up agreement with the underwriters of the IPO and secondary offerings, and by the terms of the subscription agreement entered into by the Company and each investor in connection with the Private Offering. It is possible that, once we are no longer accepting new commitments, we may seek to implement a program intended to provide limited liquidity and price discovery to holders of our common stock through an auction process; however, there can be no assurance that such a program will, in fact, be established or, if established, will provide meaningful levels of liquidity. In the event we implement such a program, investors would be subject to conditions and limitations on Transfers of our common stock made through the program.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to reclassify any unissued shares of common stock into one or more classes of preferred stock, which could convey special rights and privileges to its owners.

Under the Maryland General Corporation Law (“MGCL”) and our charter, our Board of Directors is authorized to classify and reclassify any authorized but unissued shares of stock into one or more classes of stock, including preferred stock. Prior to the issuance of shares of each class or series, the Board of Directors each quarter and is required by Maryland law and our charter to set the terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for each class or series. Thus, the Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock with terms and conditions which could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. The cost of any such reclassification would be borne by our existing common stockholders. Certain matters under the Investment Company Act require the separate vote of the holders of any issued and outstanding preferred stock. For example, holders of preferred stock would vote separately from the holders of common stock on a proposal to cease operations as a BDC. In addition, the Investment Company Act provides that holders of preferred stock are entitled to vote separately from holders of common stock to elect two preferred stock directors. We currently have no plans to issue preferred stock, but may determine to do so in the future. The issuance of preferred stock convertible into shares of common stock might also reduce the net income per share and net asset value per share of our common stock upon conversion, provided, that we will only be permitted to issue such convertible preferred stock to the extent we comply with the requirements of Section 61 of the Investment Company Act, including obtaining common stockholder approval. These effects, among others, could have an adverse effect on an investment in our common stock.

Provisions of the MGCL and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

The MGCL and our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or make more difficult a change in control of GMS Finance or the removal of our directors. We are subject to the Maryland Business Combination Act (“MBCA”), subject to any applicable requirements of the Investment Company Act. Our Board of Directors has adopted a resolution exempting from the MBCA any business combination between us and any other person, subject to prior approval of such business combination by our Board of Directors, including approval by a majority of our Independent Directors. If the resolution exempting business combinations is repealed or our Board of Directors does not approve a business combination, the Business Combination Act may discourage third parties from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer. Our bylaws exempt from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act (“Control Share Act”) acquisitions of our stock by any person. If we amend our bylaws to repeal the exemption from the Control Share Act, the Control Share Act also may make it more difficult for a third party to obtain control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating such a transaction. However, we will amend our bylaws to be subject to the Control Share Act only if our Board of Directors determines that it would be in our best interests and if the SEC staff does not object to our determination that our being subject to the Control Share Act does not conflict with the Investment Company Act. The SEC staff has issued informal guidance setting forth its position that certain provisions of the Control Share Act would, if implemented, violate Section 18(i) of the Investment Company Act.

We have also adopted measures that may make it difficult for a third party to obtain control of us, including provisions of our charter classifying our Board of Directors in three classes serving staggered three-year terms, and authorizing our Board of Directors to classify or reclassify shares of our stock in one or more classes or series, to cause the issuance of additional shares of our stock, to amend our charter without stockholder approval and to increase or decrease the number of shares of stock that we have authority to issue. These provisions, as well as other provisions of our charter and bylaws, may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our Board of Directors may change our investment objectives, operating policies and strategies without prior notice and without stockholder approval.

Our Board of Directors has the authority to modify or, if applicable, waive our investment objectives, operating policies and strategies without prior notice (except as required by the Investment Company Act) and without stockholder approval. In addition, none of our investment policies is fundamental and any of them may be changed without stockholder approval. However, absent stockholder approval, we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current investment objectives, operating policies or strategies would have on our business, operating results and value of our stock. Nevertheless, the effects may adversely affect our business and impact our ability to make distributions.

A failure in our operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, as well as cyber-attacks could significantly disrupt our business or negatively affect our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

We rely heavily on our and third parties’ financial, accounting, information and other data processing systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third-party service providers, could cause delays or other problems in our activities. We face various security threats on a regular basis, including ongoing cyber security threats to and attacks on our information technology infrastructure that are intended to gain access to our proprietary information, destroy data or disable, degrade or sabotage our systems. These security threats could originate from a wide variety of sources, including unknown third parties outside the Company. Although we are not currently aware that we have been subject to cyber-attacks or other cyber incidents which, individually or in the aggregate, have materially affected our operations or financial condition, there can be no assurance that the various procedures and controls we utilize to mitigate these threats will be sufficient to prevent disruptions to our systems. If any of these systems do not operate properly or are disabled for any reason or if there is any unauthorized disclosure of data, whether as a result of tampering, a breach of our network security systems, a cyber-incident or attack or otherwise, we could suffer substantial financial loss, increased costs, a disruption of our businesses, liability to our investors, regulatory intervention or reputational damage. In addition, we operate in a business that is highly dependent on information systems and technology. The information systems and technology that we rely on may not continue to be able to accommodate our growth, and the cost of maintaining such systems may increase from its current level. Such a failure to accommodate growth, or an increase in costs related to such information systems, could have a material adverse effect on us.

Furthermore, we depend on our and our Investment Adviser’s headquarters in New York, New York, where most of our executives, investment professionals and administrative and operations personnel are located, for the continued operation of our business. Disasters, such as natural disasters, pandemics, events arising from local or larger scale political or social matters or weather events, or disruptions in the infrastructure that supports our businesses, such as sudden electrical or telecommunications outages, could have a material adverse impact on our ability to continue to operate our business without interruption. Our disaster recovery programs may not be sufficient to mitigate the harm that may result from such disasters or disruptions. In addition, insurance and other safeguards might only partially reimburse us for our losses, if at all.

Changes in laws or regulations governing our business or the businesses of our portfolio companies and any failure by us or our portfolio companies to comply with these laws or regulations may adversely affect our business and the businesses of our portfolio companies.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to laws and regulations at the U.S. federal, state and local levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may change from time to time, and new laws, regulations and interpretations may also come into effect. Any such new or changed laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, from time to time the market for private equity

transactions has been (and is currently being) adversely affected by a decrease in the availability of senior and subordinated financings for transactions, in part in response to credit market disruptions and/or regulatory pressures on providers of financing to reduce or eliminate their exposure to the risks involved in such transactions.

In addition, as private equity firms become more influential participants in the U.S. and global financial markets and economy generally there recently has been pressure for greater governmental scrutiny and/or regulation of the private equity industry, in part. It is uncertain as to what form and in what jurisdictions such enhanced scrutiny and/or regulation, if any, on the private equity industry may ultimately take. Therefore, there can be no assurance as to whether any such scrutiny or initiatives will have an adverse impact on the private equity industry, including our ability to effect operating improvements or restructurings of its portfolio companies or otherwise achieve its objectives.

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law. Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have extended implementation periods and delayed effective dates and will require extensive rulemaking by regulatory authorities. While the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on us and our portfolio companies may not be known for an extended period of time, the Dodd-Frank Act, including future rules implementing its provisions and the interpretation of those rules, along with other legislative and regulatory proposals directed at the financial services industry and the financial markets (including derivative markets) or affecting taxation that are proposed or pending in the U.S. Congress, may negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of us or our portfolio companies, impose additional costs on us or our portfolio companies, restrict or further regulate certain of our activities, including derivative trading and hedging activities, intensify the regulatory supervision of us or our portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect our business or the business of our portfolio companies. In addition, if we do not comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could lose any licenses that we then hold for the conduct of our business and may be subject to civil fines and criminal penalties.

Our Investment Adviser can resign upon 60 days’ notice, and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement within that time, resulting in a disruption in our operations that could adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.

Our Investment Adviser has the right, under the Investment Advisory Agreement, to resign at any time upon 60 days’ written notice, whether we have found a replacement or not. If our Investment Adviser resigns, we may not be able to find a new investment adviser or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 60 days, or at all. If we are unable to do so quickly, our operations are likely to experience a disruption, our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as our ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected and the value of our shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of our internal management and investment activities is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by our Investment Adviser and its affiliates. Even if we are able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, the integration of such management and their lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations. Moreover, the termination by our Investment Adviser of our Investment Advisory Agreement for any reason will be an event of default under the Revolving Credit Facility, which could result in the immediate acceleration of the amounts due under the Revolving Credit Facility. Similarly, it will be an event of default under the Facility if our Investment Adviser or an affiliate of our Investment Adviser ceases to manage us, which could result in the immediate acceleration of the amounts due under the Facility.

Our Administrator can resign from its role as Administrator under the Administration Agreement, and a suitable replacement may not be found, resulting in disruptions that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our Administrator has the right to resign under the Administration Agreement upon 60 days’ written notice, whether a replacement has been found or not. If our Administrator resigns, it may be difficult to find a new administrator or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms, or at all. If a replacement is not found quickly, our business, results of operations and financial condition are likely to be adversely affected and the value of our common stock may decline. Even if a comparable service provider or individuals to perform such services are retained, whether internal or external, their integration into our business and lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Any of our three sub-administrators can resign from their respective roles pursuant to the Carlyle Employee Co. Sub-Administration Agreement, the CELF Sub-Administration Agreement and the State Street Sub-Administration Agreement, and suitable replacements may not be found, resulting in disruptions that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Each of Carlyle Employee Co., CELF and State Street has the right to resign under their respective agreements, the Carlyle Employee Co. Sub-Administration Agreement, the CELF Sub-Administration Agreement and the State Street Sub-Administration Agreement, upon 60 days’ written notice, whether a replacement has been found or not. If any of our sub-administrators resign, it may be difficult to find a new administrator or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms, or at all. If a replacement is not found quickly, our business, results of operations and financial condition are likely to be adversely affected and the value of our common stock may decline. Even if a comparable service provider or individuals to perform such services are retained, whether internal or external, their integration into our business and lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Investments

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities, and compete with investment vehicles sponsored or advised by our affiliates.

A number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we target in leveraged companies. We compete with other BDCs, public and private funds, commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds, some of which may be affiliates of us. Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than we do, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the Investment Company Act and the Code impose on us. The competitive pressures we face may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

We do not seek to compete primarily based on the interest rates we offer, and we believe that some of our competitors may make loans with interest rates that are comparable to or lower than the rates we offer. We may lose investment opportunities if we do not match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure. However, if we

match our competitors’ pricing, terms and structure, we may experience decreased net interest income and increased risk of credit loss.

We may not replicate the historical success of Carlyle, and our ability to enter into transactions with Carlyle and our other affiliates is restricted.

We cannot provide any assurance that we will replicate the historical success of Carlyle, and our investment returns could be substantially lower than the returns achieved by other Carlyle managed funds.

In addition, the Investment Company Act and the Code impose numerous constraints on the operations of BDCs and RICs that do not apply to the other types of investment vehicles. For example, under the Investment Company Act, BDCs are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets primarily in securities of qualifying U.S. private companies or thinly traded public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less from the time of investment. The CGMSIM Investment Team’s limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets under such constraints may hinder their respective ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and, as a result, achieve our investment objectives.

Further, we and certain of our controlled affiliates are prohibited under the Investment Company Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our upstream affiliates, or our Investment Adviser and its affiliates, without the prior approval of our Independent Directors and, in some cases, the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities is our upstream affiliate for purposes of the Investment Company Act and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security (other than our securities) from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval of our Independent Directors. The Investment Company Act also prohibits “joint” transactions with an upstream affiliate, or our Adviser or its affiliates, which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times), without prior approval of our Independent Directors. In addition, we and certain of our controlled affiliates are prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to, or entering into joint transactions with, our Adviser and its affiliates, or any person who owns more than 25% of our voting securities or is otherwise deemed to control, be controlled by, or be under common control with us, absent the prior approval of the SEC through an exemptive order (other than in certain limited situations pursuant to current regulatory guidance as described below). The analysis of whether a particular transaction constitutes a joint transaction requires a review of the relevant facts and circumstances then existing.

In addition to co-investing pursuant to our Exemptive Relief, we may invest alongside affiliates or their affiliates in certain circumstances where doing so is consistent with applicable law and current regulatory guidance. For example, we may invest alongside such investors consistent with guidance promulgated by the SEC staff permitting us and an affiliated person to purchase interests in a single class of privately placed securities so long as certain conditions are met, including that we negotiate no term other than price. We may, in certain cases, also make investments in securities owned by affiliates that we acquire from non-affiliates. In such circumstances, our ability to participate in any restructuring of such investment or other transaction involving the issuer of such investment may be limited, and as a result, we may realize a loss on such investments that might have been prevented or reduced had we not been restricted in participating in such restructuring or other transaction.

Our investments are risky and speculative.

We invest primarily in loans to middle market companies whose debt, if rated, is rated below investment grade. Investments rated below investment grade are generally considered higher risk than investment grade instruments.

First Lien Senior Secured Loans. When we make a senior secured term loan investment in a portfolio company, we generally take a security interest in substantially all of the available assets of the portfolio

company, including the equity interests of its domestic subsidiaries, which we expect to help mitigate the risk that we will not be repaid. However, there is a risk that the collateral securing our loans may decrease in value over time, may be difficult to sell in a timely manner, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based upon the success of the businesstaxable earnings estimated by management and market conditions, including as a result of the inability of the portfolio company to raise additionalavailable cash. Net realized capital and, in some circumstances, our lien could be subordinated to claims of other creditors. In addition, deterioration in a portfolio company’s financial condition and prospects, including its inability to raise additional capital, may be accompanied by deterioration in the value of the collateral for the loan. Consequently, the fact that a loan is secured does not guarantee that we will receive principal and interest payments according to the loan’s terms, or at all, or that we will be able to collect on the loan should we be forced to enforce our remedies.

Unitranche Loans. Unitranche loans provide leverage levels comparable to a combination of first lien and second lien or subordinated loans, and may rank junior to other debt instruments issued by the portfolio company. Unitranche loans generally allow the borrower to make a large lump sum payment of principal at the end of the loan term, and there is a heightened risk of loss if the borrower is unable to pay the lump sum or refinance the amount owed at maturity. From the perspective of a lender, in addition to making a single loan, a unitranche loan may allow the lender to choose to participate in the “first out” tranche, which will generally receive priority with respect to payments of principal, interest and any other amounts due, or to choose to participate only in the “last out” tranche, which is generally paid after the first out tranche is paid. We participate in “first out” and “last out” tranches of unitranche loans and make single unitranche loans.

Second Lien Senior Secured Loans and Junior Debt Investments. Our second lien senior secured loans are subordinated to first lien loans and our junior debt investments, such as mezzanine loans, generally are subordinated to both first lien and second lien loans and have junior security interests or may be unsecured. As such, to the extent we hold second lien senior secured loans and junior debt investments, holders of first lien loans may be repaid before us in the event of a bankruptcy or other insolvency proceeding. This may result in an above average amount of risk and loss of principal.

Equity Investments. When we invest in senior secured loans or mezzanine loans, we may acquire equity securities as well. In addition, we may invest directly in the equity securities of portfolio companies. Our goal is ultimately to dispose of such equity interests and realize gains, upon our disposition of such interests. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

In addition, investing in middle market companies involves a number of significant risks, including:

these companies may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt securities that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing on any guarantees we may have obtained in connection with our investment;

they typically have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;

they are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on a portfolio company and, in turn, on us;

they generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position. In addition, our executive officers, directors and our

Investment Adviser may, in the ordinary course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising from our investments in the portfolio companies; and

they may have difficulty accessing the capital markets to meet future capital needs, which may limit their ability to grow or to repay their outstanding indebtedness upon maturity.

Our investments in CLOs may be riskier and less transparent to us and our stockholders than direct investments in the underlying companies.

We invest in CLOs. Generally, there may be less information available to us regarding the underlying debt investments held by CLOs than if we had invested directly in the debt of the underlying companies. As a result, our stockholders will not know the details of the underlying securities of the CLOs in which we invest. Our CLO investments are also subject to the risk of leverage associated with the debt issued by such CLOs and the repayment priority of senior debt holders in such CLOs.

CLOs typically have no significant assets other than their underlying loans; payments on CLO investments are and will be payable solely from the cash flows from such loans; and our investments in CLOs are subject to leverage.

CLOs typically have no significant assets other than their underlying loans. Accordingly, payments on CLO investments are and will be payable solely from the cash flows from such loans, net of all management fees and other expenses. Payments to us as a holder of CLO investments are and will be met only after payments due on the senior notes (and, where appropriate, the junior secured notes) from time to time have been made in full. This means that relatively small numbers of defaults of loans may adversely impact our returns.

In addition, we may be in a subordinated position with respect to realized losses on loans underlying our investments in CLOs. The leveraged nature of CLOs, in particular, magnifies the adverse impact of loan defaults. CLO investments represent a leveraged investment with respect to the underlying loans. Therefore, changes in the market value of the CLO investments could be greater than the change in the market value of the underlying loans, which are subject to credit, liquidity and interest rate risk.

The CLOs in which we invest may be subject to withholding tax if they fail to comply with certain reporting requirements.

Legislation commonly referred to as the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act,” or FATCA, imposes a withholding tax of 30% on payments of U.S. source interest and distributions, and gross proceeds from the disposition of an instrument that produces U.S. source interest or distributions paid after December 31, 2016, to certain non-U.S. entities, including certain non-U.S. financial institutions and investment funds, unless such non-U.S. entity complies with certain reporting requirements regarding its U.S. account holders and its U.S. owners. Most CLO vehicles in which we invest will be treated as non-U.S. financial entities for this purpose, and therefore will be required to comply with these reporting requirements to avoid the 30% withholding. If a CLO vehicle in which we invest fails to properly comply with these reporting requirements, it could reduce the amounts available to distribute to equity and junior debt holders in such CLO vehicle, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.

Failure by a CLO vehicle in which we are invested to satisfy certain tests will harm our operating results.

The failure by a CLO in which we invest to satisfy financial covenants, including with respect to adequate collateralization and/or interest coverage tests, could lead to a reduction in its payments to us. In the event that a CLO fails certain tests, holders of debt senior to us may be entitled to additional payments that would, in turn, reduce the payments we would otherwise be entitled to receive. Separately, we may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, with a defaulting CLO or any other investment we may make. If any of these occur, it could materially and adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.

To the extent we make investments in restructurings and reorganizations they may be subject to greater regulatory and legal risks than other traditional direct investments in portfolio companies.

We may make investments in restructurings that involve, or otherwise invest in the debt securities of, companies that are experiencing or are expected to experience severe financial difficulties. These severe financial difficulties may never be overcome and may cause such companies to become subject to bankruptcy proceedings. As such, these investments could subject us to certain additional potential liabilities that may exceed the value of our original investment therein. For instance, under certain circumstances, payments to us and our distributions to stockholders may be reclaimed if any, such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance, preferential payment or similar transaction under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws. Furthermore, investments in restructurings may be adversely affected by statutes relating to, among other things, fraudulent conveyances, voidable preferences, lender liability and the court’s discretionary power to disallow, subordinate or disenfranchise particular claims. Under certain circumstances, a lender that has inappropriately exercised control of the management and policies of a debtor may have its claims subordinated or disallowed, or may be found liable for damages suffered by parties as a result of such actions.

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

We generally make investments in private companies. Substantially all of these investments are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments. In addition, we may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate an investment in a portfolio company to the extent that we have material non-public information regarding such portfolio company.

We have not yet identified all of the portfolio companies we will invest in.

We have not yet identified all of the potential investments for our portfolio that we will acquire with the proceeds of the Private Offering. Our Investment Adviser selected our initial investments prior to our past drawdowns and will select subsequent investments prior to any subsequent drawdown. Our stockholders will have no input with respect to investment decisions. These factors increase the uncertainty, and thus the risk, of investing in our common stock.

Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies and industries, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt instruments or if there is a downturn in a particular industry.

Although we do not intend to focus our investments in any specific industries, our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies and industries. Beyond the asset diversification requirements associated with our qualification as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and under the Revolving Credit Facility, Facility and 2015-1 Notes, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and while we do not target any specific industries, our investments may be concentrated in relatively few industries. As a result, the aggregate returns we will realize may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of one or more investments. Additionally, a downturn in any particular industry in which we are invested could also significantly impact the aggregate returns we realize.

Leveraged companies may enter into bankruptcy proceedings at higher rates than companies that are not leveraged and we invest in debt securities of these companies.

Leveraged companies, such as those in which we invest, may be more prone to bankruptcy or similar financial distress. The bankruptcy process has a number of significant inherent risks. Many events in a

bankruptcy proceeding are the product of contested matters and adversary proceedings and are beyond the control of the creditors. A bankruptcy filing by an issuer may adversely and permanently affect the issuer. If the proceeding is converted to a liquidation, the value of the issuer may not equal the liquidation value that was believed to exist at the time of the investment. The duration of a bankruptcy proceeding is also difficult to predict, and a creditor’s return on investment can be adversely affected by delays until the plan of reorganization or liquidation ultimately becomes effective. The administrative costs of a bankruptcy proceeding are frequently high and would be paid out of the debtor’s estate prior to any return to creditors. Because the standards for classification of claims under bankruptcy law are vague, our influence with respect to the class of securities or other obligations we own may be lost by increases in the number and amount of claims in the same class or by different classification and treatment. In the early stages of the bankruptcy process, it is often difficult to estimate the extent of, or even to identify, any contingent claims that might be made. In addition, certain claims that have priority by law (for example, claims for taxes) may be substantial.

In addition, lenders can be subject to lender liability claims for actions taken by them where they become too involved in the borrower’s business or exercise control over the borrower. For example, we could become subject to a lender liability claim (alleging that we misused our influence on the borrower for the benefit of its lenders), if, among other things, the borrower requests significant managerial assistance from us and we provide that assistance.

Declines in the prices of corporate debt securities and illiquidity in the corporate debt markets may adversely affect the fair value of our portfolio investments, reducing our net asset value through increased net unrealized depreciation.

As a BDC, we are required to account for our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of our Board of Directors. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments are recorded as unrealized depreciation. Depending on market conditions, we may face similar losses, which could reduce our net asset value and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because we generally do not hold controlling equity interests in our portfolio companies, we may not be in a position to exercise control over our portfolio companies or to prevent decisions by management of our portfolio companies that could decrease the value of our investments.

Although we may do so in the future, currently we do not intend to hold controlling equity positions in our portfolio companies. Our non-controlling investments may be acquired through trading activities or through direct purchases of securities from the portfolio company. In addition, we may acquire minority equity interests in large transactions in which our level of control over the equity investment is limited. Accordingly, we may not be able to control decisions relating to a minority equity investment, including decisions relating to the management and operation of the portfolio company and the timing and nature of any exit. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and that the management and/or stockholders of a portfolio company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that are adverse to our interests. Due to the lack of liquidity of the investments that we typically hold in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our investments in the event we disagree with the actions of a portfolio company and may therefore suffer a decrease in the value of our investments. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow could suffer as a result.

An investment strategy focused primarily on privately held companies presents certain challenges, including the lack of available information about these companies, a dependence on the talents and efforts of only a few key portfolio company personnel and a greater vulnerability to economic downturns.

We invest primarily in privately held companies. Generally, little public information exists about these companies, and we are required to rely on the ability of our Investment Adviser to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential returns from investing in these companies. The due diligence process that our Investment

Adviser undertakes in connection with our investments may not reveal all the facts that may be relevant in connection with such investment. If our Investment Adviser is unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may not make a fully informed investment decision, and we may lose money on our investments. Also, privately held companies frequently have less diverse product lines and smaller market presence than larger competitors. These factors could adversely affect our investment returns as compared to companies investing primarily in the securities of public companies.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, some of our investments in such companies.

We invest primarily in Middle Market Senior Loans issued by our portfolio companies. To the extent we invest in second lien, mezzanine or other instruments, our portfolio companies typically may be permitted to incur other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, such debt instruments. By their terms, such debt instruments may provide that the holders are entitled to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we will be entitled to receive payments in respect of the debt securities in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. In such cases, after repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have sufficient remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt securities in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.

The rights we may have with respect to the collateral securing the debt investments we make in our portfolio companies with senior debt outstanding may also be limited pursuant to the terms of one or more intercreditor agreements that we enter into with the holders of senior debt. Under such an intercreditor agreement, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first priority liens are outstanding, any of the following actions that may be taken in respect of the collateral will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first priority liens: the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against the collateral; the ability to control the conduct of such proceedings; the approval of amendments to collateral documents; releases of liens on the collateral; and waivers of past defaults under collateral documents. We may not have the ability to control or direct such actions, even if our rights are adversely affected.

Our investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.

Our investment strategy contemplates investments in debt securities of foreign companies. Investing in foreign companies may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. companies. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the United States, higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility. As a result of investing in foreign securities, we may be subject to withholding and other foreign taxes with respect to those securities. We do not expect to satisfy the conditions necessary to pass through to our stockholders their share of the foreign taxes paid by us. In addition, interest income derived from loans to foreign companies is not eligible to be distributed to our non-U.S. stockholders free from U.S. withholding tax.

Although most of our investments are expected to be U.S. dollar-denominated, any investments denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-

term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation, and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we can offer no assurance that we will, in fact, hedge currency risk, or that if we do, such strategies will be effective.

We may expose ourselves to risks if we engage in hedging transactions.

If we engage in hedging transactions, we may expose ourselves to risks associated with such transactions. We may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, credit default swaps, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions from changes in currency exchange rates, credit risk premiums, and market interest rates. Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions should increase. It may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation at an acceptable price that is generally anticipated. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the effect of the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations. Income derived from hedging transactions is generally not eligible to be distributed to non-U.S. stockholders free from U.S. withholding tax. We may determine not to hedge against particular risks, including if we determine that available hedging transactions are not available at an appropriate price.

We are dependent upon our Investment Adviser’s key investment professionals for our future success.

We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the CGMSIM Investment Team and the GMS platform to source appropriate investments for us. We depend on members of the CGMSIM Investment Team to appropriately analyze our investments and the CGMSIM Investment Committee to approve and monitor our middle market portfolio investments. The CGMSIM Investment Committee, together with the other members of the CGMSIM Investment Team, evaluate, negotiate, structure, close and monitor our investments. Our future success will depend on the continued availability of the members of the CGMSIM Investment Committee and the other investment professionals available to CGMSIM. Neither we nor CGMSIM has employment agreements with these individuals or other key personnel, and we cannot provide any assurance that unforeseen business, medical, personal or other circumstances would not lead any such individual to terminate his or her relationship with us. The loss of Messrs. Petrick and Hart, or any of the other senior investment professionals to which CGMSIM has access, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective as well as on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our contract with CGMSIM is terminable by either party upon 60 days’ notice, and we can offer no assurance that CGMSIM will remain our Investment Adviser.

We may face other restrictions on our ability to liquidate our investment in a portfolio companies.

Management of the Company seeks investment opportunities that offer the possibility of attaining substantial capital appreciation. Certain events particular to each industry in which the Company’s investments conduct their operations, as well as general economic and political conditions, may have a significant negative impact on the investee’s operations and profitability. In addition, the Company is subject to changing regulatory and tax environments. Such events are beyond the Company’s control, and the likelihood that they may occur and the effect on the Company cannot be predicted. Furthermore, most of the Company’s investments are made in private companies whose shares do not trade on established exchanges. While it is expected that these companies may pursue initial public offerings, trade sales, or other liquidation events, there are generally no

public markets for these securities at the current time. The Company’s ability to liquidate its private company investments and realize value is subject to significant limitations and uncertainties, including currency fluctuations.

The Company’s ability to liquidate its publicly traded investments may be subject to limitations, including discounts that may be required to be taken on quoted prices due to the number of shares being sold.

Risks Related to Debt Securitization Financing Transactions

We are subject to certain risks as a result of our direct interest in the Preferred Interests of the 2015-1 Issuer.

As part of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, certain first and second lien senior secured loans were distributed by the Borrower Sub to the Company pursuant to a distribution and contribution agreement. The Company contributed the loans that comprised the initial closing date loan portfolio (including the loans distributed to the Company from the Borrower Sub) to the 2015-1 Issuer pursuant to a contribution agreement. Following this transfer, the 2015-1 Issuer held all of the equity ownership interest in such loans portfolio. As a result, the Company received 100% of the Preferred Interests issued by the 2015-1 Issuer in exchange for the Company’s contribution to the 2015-1 Issuer of the initial closing date loan portfolio. The 2015-1 Notes are included in the consolidated financial statements and the Preferred Interests are eliminated in consolidation.

Because each of the Borrower Sub and the 2015-1 Issuer is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the sale or contribution by Borrower Sub to us and the sale or contribution by us to the 2015-1 Issuer did not constitute a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the U.S. Internal Revenue Service were to take a contrary position, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The Preferred Interests in the 2015-1 Issuer are subordinated obligations of the 2015-1 Issuer.

The 2015-1 Issuer is the residual claimant on funds, if any, remaining after holders of all classes of 2015-1 Notes have been paid in full on each payment date or upon maturity of the 2015-1 Notes under the 2015-1 Debt Securitization documents. The Preferred Interests in the 2015-1 Issuer represent all of the equity interest in the 2015-1 Issuer and, as the holder of the Preferred Interests, we may receive distributions, if any, only to the extent that the 2015-1 Issuer makes distributions out of funds remaining after holders of all classes of 2015-1 Notes have been paid in full on each payment date any amounts due and owing on such payment date or upon maturity of the 2015-1 Notes.

The 2015-1 Issuer may fail to meet certain asset coverage tests.

Under the documents governing the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, there are two coverage tests applicable to the 2015-1 Notes.

The first such test compares the amount of interest received on the portfolio loans held by the 2015-1 Issuer to the amount of interest payable in respect of the 2015-1 Notes. To meet this first test, interest received on the portfolio loans must equal at least 120% of the interest payable in respect of the 2015-1 Notes issued by the 2015-1 Issuer.

The second such test compares the adjusted collateral principal amount of the portfolio loans of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the 2015-1 Notes. To meet this second test at any time, the adjusted collateral principal amount of the portfolio loans must equal at least 140% of the outstanding principal amount of the 2015-1 Notes. If any coverage test with respect to the 2015-1 Notes is not met, proceeds from the portfolio of loans that otherwise would have been distributed to the holders of the Preferred Interests of 2015-1 Issuer will instead be used to redeem first the 2015-1 Notes, to the extent necessary

to satisfy the applicable asset coverage tests on a pro forma basis after giving effect to all payments made in respect of the 2015-1 Notes, which we refer to as a mandatory redemption, or to obtain the necessary ratings confirmation.

We may not receive cash from the 2015-1 Issuer.

We receive cash from the 2015-1 Issuer only to the extent of payments on the distributions, if any, with respect to the Preferred Interests of the 2015-1 Issuer as permitted under the 2015-1 Debt Securitization. The 2015-1 Issuer may only make payments on Preferred Interests to the extent permitted by the payment priority provisions of the indenture governing the 2015-1 Notes (the “2015-1 Indenture”), as applicable, which generally provide, distribution to Preferred Interests holder may not be made on any payment date unless all amounts owing under the 2015-1 Notes are paid in full.

In addition, if the 2015-1 Issuer does not meet the asset coverage tests or the interest coverage test set forth in the documents governing the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, cash would be diverted to first pay the 2015-1 Notes in amounts sufficient to cause such tests to be satisfied. In the event that we fail to receive cash directly from the 2015-1 Issuer, we could be unable to make such distributions in amounts sufficient to maintain our status as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or at all.

We may be required to assume liabilities of the 2015-1 Issuer and are indirectly liable for certain representations and warranties in connection with the 2015-1 Debt Securitization.

As part of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, we entered into a contribution agreement under which we would be required to repurchase any loan (or participation interest therein) which was sold to the 2015-1 Issuer, in breach of any representation or warranty made by us with respect to such loan on the date such loan was sold. To the extent we fail to satisfy any such repurchase obligation, the trustee of the 2015-1Debt Securitization may, on behalf of the 2015-1 Issuer, bring an action against us to enforce these repurchase obligations.

The structure of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization is intended to prevent, in the event of our bankruptcy, the consolidation of the 2015-1 Issuer with our operations. If the true sale of the assets in the 2015-1 Debt Securitization were not respected in the event of our insolvency, a trustee or debtor-in-possession might reclaim the assets of the 2015-1 Issuer for our estate. However, in doing so, we would become directly liable for all of the indebtedness then outstanding under the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, which would equal the full amount of debt of the 2015-1 Issuer reflected on our consolidated balance sheet.

In addition, in connection with 2015-1 Debt Securitization, the Company has made customary representations, warranties and covenants to the 2015-1 Issuer. We remain liable for any breach of such representations for the life of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization.

The interests of holders of the 2015-1 Notes issued by the 2015-1 Issuer may not be aligned with our interests.

The 2015-1 Notes are the debt obligations ranking senior in right of payment to the Preferred Interests holders. As such, there are circumstances in which the interests of holders of the 2015-1Notes may not be aligned with the interests of the Preferred Interests of the 2015-1 Issuer. For example, under the terms of the 2015-1 Issuer, holders of the 2015-1 Notes have the right to receive payments of principal and interest prior to distribution to the holders of the Preferred Interests of the 2015-1 Issuer.

For as long as the 2015-1 Notes remain outstanding, holders of the 2015-1 Notes have the right to act, in certain circumstances, with respect to the portfolio loans in ways that may benefit their interests but not the interests of holders of the Preferred Interests of the 2015-1 Issuer, including by exercising remedies under the 2015-1 Indenture.

If an event of default has occurred and acceleration occurs in accordance with the terms of the 2015-1 Indenture, the 2015-1 Notes then outstanding will be paid in full before any further payment or distribution to the Preferred Interests. In addition, if an event of default occurs, holders of a majority of the 2015-1 Notes then outstanding will be entitled to determine the remedies to be exercised under the 2015-1 Indenture, subject to the terms of the 2015-1 Indenture. For example, upon the occurrence of an event of default with respect to the notes issued by the 2015-1 Issuer, the trustee or holders of a majority of the 2015-1 Notes then outstanding may declare the principal, together with any accrued interest, of all the 2015-1 Notes to be immediately due and payable. This would have the effect of accelerating the principal on such notes, triggering a repayment obligation on the part of the 2015-1 Issuer. If at such time the portfolio loans of the 2015-1 Issuer were not performing well, the 2015-1 Issuer may not have sufficient proceeds available to enable the trustee under the 2015-1 Indenture to pay a distribution to holders of the Preferred Interests of the 2015-1 Issuer.

Remedies pursued by the holders of the 2015-1 Notes could be adverse to the interests of the holders of the Preferred Interests, and the holders of the 2015-1 Notes will have no obligation to consider any possible adverse effect on such other interests. Thus, any remedies pursued by the holders of the 2015-1 Notes may not be in our best interests and we may not receive payments or distributions upon an acceleration of the 2015-1 Notes. Any failure of the 2015-1 Issuer to make distributions on Preferred Interests we hold, directly or indirectly, whether as a result of an event of default or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and may result in an inability of us to make distributions sufficient to allow for us to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

If we have not consummated a Qualified IPO by May 2, 2018, it could result in an early optional redemption of the 2015-1 Notes.

If we have not consummated a Qualified IPO by May 2, 2018, then our Board of Directors (subject to any necessary stockholder approvals and applicable requirements of the Investment Company Act) will use its best efforts to wind-down and/or liquidate and dissolve us. If this were to occur, it would likely result in us using our rights, as a holder of the Preferred Interests to effect an optional redemption of the 2015-1 Notes. If at such time the portfolio loans of the 2015-1 Issuer were not performing well, the 2015-1 Issuer may not have sufficient proceeds available to enable the trustee under the 2015-1 Indenture to pay a distribution to holders of the Preferred Interests of the 2015-1 Issuer.

To the extent we use additional structured financing vehicles, we could be subject to heightened risk versus holding direct investments in underlying portfolio companies.

To finance investments, we may continue to securitize certain of our investments, including through the formation of one or more additional CLOs, while retaining all or most of the exposure to the performance of these investments. This would involve contributing a pool of assets to a special purpose entity, and selling debt interests in such entity on a non-recourse or limited-recourse basis to purchasers. Any interest in any such CLO held by the Company may be considered a “non-qualifying asset” for purposes of Section 55 of the Investment Company Act.

If we create another CLO, we will likely depend on distributions from the CLO’s assets out of its earnings and cash flows to enable us to make distributions to our stockholders. The ability of a CLO to make distributions or pay dividends will be subject to various limitations, including the terms and covenants of the debt it issues. For example, tests (based on interest coverage or other financial ratios or other criteria) may restrict our ability, as holder of a CLO’s equity interests, to receive cash flow from these investments. There is no assurance any such performance tests will be satisfied. Also, a CLO may take actions that delay distributions in order to preserve ratings and to keep the cost of present and future financings lower or the CLO may be obligated to retain cash or other assets to satisfy over-collateralization requirements commonly provided for holders of the CLO’s debt. As a result, there may be a lag, which could be significant, between the repayment or other realization on a loan or other assets in, and the distribution of cash out of, a CLO, or cash flow may be completely restricted for the life of the CLO.

In addition, a decline in the credit quality of loans in a CLO due to poor operating results of the relevant borrower, declines in the value of loan collateral or increases in defaults, among other things, may force a CLO to sell certain assets at a loss, reducing their earnings and, in turn, cash potentially available for distribution to us for distribution to our stockholders.

To the extent that any losses are incurred by the CLO in respect of any collateral, such losses will be borne first by us as owner of equity interests. Finally, any equity interests that we retain in a CLO will not be secured by the assets of the CLO and we will rank behind all creditors of the CLO.

Risks Related to an Investment in Our Securities

There is a risk that our stockholders may not receive distributions or that our distributions may not grow over time.

We cannot provide any assurance that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to make a specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. In addition, due to the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions.

Our stockholders may be required to pay federal income taxes in excess of the cash dividends they receive.

We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in cash or shares of our common stock at the election of each stockholder. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash would receive a pro rata amount of cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in stock). In no event would any stockholder electing to receive cash receive less than 10% of his or her entire distribution in cash. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the amount of a dividend paid in stock would be equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of stock.

Stockholders receiving dividends in shares of our common stock would be required to include the full amount of the dividend (including the portion payable in stock) as ordinary income (or, in certain circumstances, long-term capital gain) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes. As a result, stockholders may be required to pay income taxes with respect to such dividends in excess of the cash dividends received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the common stock that it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our common stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in common stock. In addition, if a significant number of our stockholders were to determine to sell shares of our common stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price (if any) of our common stock. It is unclear whether and to what extent we will be able to pay taxable dividends of the type described in this paragraph.

Our taxable income is expected to differ from our income determined in accordance with US GAAP and to be a factor considered by our Board in determining the amount and frequency of our dividends.

The character of income and gains to be distributed by us is determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations that may differ from the determination of income in accordance with US GAAP, particularly as it relates to our CLO equity investments. Taxable income on our CLO equity investments is based upon the distributable share of earnings as determined under tax regulations, which may be consistent with the cash flows generated by those investments, while our income for US GAAP purposes from these investments is currently based upon an effective yield calculation. Accordingly, taxable income attributed to a CLO equity investment can be significantly different from the calculation of income on these investments for financial reporting purposes. In general, we expect our annual taxable income from our CLO equity investments to be higher than our income from these investments determined in accordance with US GAAP on the basis of actual

cash received. The minimum distribution requirements applicable to companies like us that have elected to be treated as “regulated investment companies” for U.S. federal income tax purposes require us to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our investment company taxable income each year. We expect our Board of Directors to consider, among other factors, these minimum distribution requirements in determining the amount and frequency of our dividends.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

We maintain our principal executive office at 520 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor, New York, NY 10022. We do not own any real estate.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company may become party to certain lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. The Company is not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against the Company. See also Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Market Information

Until the completion of a Qualified IPO, our outstanding common stock will be offered and sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act under Section 4(2) and Regulation D, as well as under Regulation S under the Securities Act. There is no established public trading market for our common stock currently, nor can we give any assurance that one will develop.

Holders

As of March 11, 2016, there were approximately 1,625 holders of record of our common stock.

Distribution Policy

To the extent that we have taxable income available, we intend to distribute quarterly dividends to our stockholders. The amount of our dividends, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors. Any dividends to our stockholders will be declared out of assets legally available for distribution. We anticipate that our distributions will generally be paid from post-offering taxable earnings, including interest and capital gains generated by our investment portfolio, and any other income, including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees, that we receive from portfolio companies. However, if we do not generate sufficient taxable earnings during a year, all or part of a distribution may constitute a return of capital. The specific tax characteristics of our dividends and other distributions will be reported to stockholders after the end of each calendar year.

We have elected to be treated, and intend to continue to qualify annually, as a RIC. To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must, among other things, distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on RICs, we intend to distribute during each calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum of: (1) 98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year; (2) 98.2% of our capital gain net income (both long-term and short-term) for the one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year; and, (3) any ordinary income and capital gain net income (both long-term and short-term) for preceding years that were not distributed during such years and on which we paid no U.S. federal income tax. In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized net capital gains (i.e., net long term capital gains in excess of short term capital losses), if any, at least annually, wealthough the Company may in the future decide to retain such capital gains for investment, pay U.S. federal income taxinvestment.

Prior to July 5, 2017, the Company had an “opt in” dividend reinvestment plan. Effective on such amounts at regular corporate tax rates, and electJuly 5, 2017, the Company converted the “opt in” dividend reinvestment plan to treat such gains as deemed distributions to stockholders. We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, to the extent that we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the Investment Company Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings.

We intend to make distributions in cash unless a stockholder elects to receive dividends and/or long-term capital gains distributions in additional shares of common stock.See “—Dividend Reinvestment Plan” below. We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the Investment Company Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings.

The following table summarizes the Company’s dividends declared since inception through March 11, 2016:

Date Declared

  

Record

Date

  

Payment

Date

  Per Share
Amount
  Total
Amount
   Annualized
Dividend Yield(1)
 

March 13, 2014

  March 31, 2014  April 14, 2014  $0.19   $2,449    4.76

June 26, 2014

  June 30, 2014  July 14, 2014  $0.27   $3,481     5.52

September 12, 2014

  September 18, 2014  October 9, 2014  $0.44   $5,956     9.23

December 19, 2014

  December 29, 2014  January 26, 2015  $0.35   $6,276     8.17

March 11, 2015

  March 13, 2015  April 17, 2015  $0.37   $7,833     8.58

June 24, 2015

  June 30, 2015  July 22, 2015  $0.37   $9,902     9.03

September 24, 2015

  September 24, 2015  October 22, 2015  $0.42   $11,670     8.91

December 29, 2015

  December 29, 2015  January 22, 2016  $0.40   $12,610     8.97

December 29, 2015

  December 29, 2015  January 22, 2016  $0.18(2)  $5,674     4.03

March 10, 2016

  March 14, 2016  April 22, 2016(3)  $0.40   $13,337     9.26

(1)Annualized dividend yield is calculated by dividing the declared dividend by the weighted average of the net asset value at the beginning of the quarter and the capital called during the quarter and annualizing over 4 quarterly periods.
(2)Represents a special dividend.
(3)Payable on or about April 22, 2016.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

The Company has adopted aan “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of anydividends and other distributions on behalf of itsthe stockholders, forother than those stockholders who have elected to participate in“opted out” of the plan. As a result of adopting such athe plan, if theour Board of Directors authorizes, and GMS Financethe Company declares, a cash dividend or distribution, the stockholders who have not elected to participate in“opt out” of the dividend reinvestment plan wouldwill have their cash dividends or distributions automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock, rather than receiving cash. PriorEach registered stockholder may elect to a Qualified IPO,have such stockholder’s dividends and distributions distributed in cash rather than participate in the plan. For any registered stockholder that does not so elect, distributions on such stockholder’s shares will be reinvested by State Street Bank and Trust Company, intendsour plan administrator, in additional shares. The number of shares to use primarily newlybe issued sharesto the stockholder will be determined based on the total dollar amount of its common stock to implement the plan issued at thecash distribution payable, net asset value per share most recently determined by the Board of Directors. After a Qualified IPO, theapplicable withholding taxes. The Company intends to use primarily newly issued shares to implement the plan so long as the market value per share is equal to or greater than the net asset value per share as of the close of business on the relevant payment date for such dividend or distribution.valuation date. If the market value per share is less than the net asset value per share as of the close of business on the relevant paymentvaluation date, the plan administrator would implement the plan through the purchase theof common stock on behalf of participants in the open market, unless the Company instructs the plan administrator otherwise.

Functional Currency
The functional currency of the Company is the U.S. Dollar and all transactions were in U.S. Dollars.
Recent Sales of Unregistered SecuritiesAccounting Standards Updates
The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-9”) in May 2014 and Use of Proceeds

Except as previously reported bysubsequently issued several amendments to the standard. ASU 2014-9, and related amendments, provide comprehensive guidance for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. Entities will be able to recognize revenue when the entity transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance includes a five-step framework that requires an entity to: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The guidance in ASU 2014-9, and the related amendments, is effective for the Company on its current reports on Form 8-K, we did not sell any securities during the period covered by this Form 10-K that were not registered under the Securities Act.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

January 1, 2018. The tables below set forth our selected consolidated historical financial data for the periods indicated. The selected consolidated historical financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The selected consolidated financial information and other data presented below should be read in conjunction with the information contained in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015  2014  2013 
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)          

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data

    

Income

    

Total investment income

  $69,190   $32,984   $4,969  

Expenses

    

Net expenses

   33,666    18,724    6,638  

Net investment income (loss)

   35,524    14,260    (1,669

Net realized gain (loss) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   1,164    72    63  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   (18,015  (8,718  (321

Net increase (decrease) in net asset resulting from operations

   18,673    5,614    (1,927

Basic and diluted earnings per common share

  $0.75   $0.43   $(0.64

Dividends declared per common share(1)

  $1.74   $1.25   $—    

(1)Cumulative per share dividends declared by the Company’s Board of Directors for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. The Company’s Board of Directors did not declare a dividend during the year ended December 31, 2013.

  As of and for the years ended
December 31,
 
  2015  2014  2013 
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)   

Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities Data

 

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated, at fair value

 $1,052,666   $698,662   $212,807  

Cash and cash equivalents

  41,837    8,754    42,010  

Total assets

  1,106,388    716,720    260,967  

Secured borrowings

  234,313    308,441    66,822  

2015-1 Notes payable

  273,000    —      —    

Total liabilities

  534,662    378,463    74,965  

Total net assets

  571,726    338,257    186,002  

Net assets per share

 $18.14   $18.86   $19.42  

Other Data:

 

Number of portfolio companies/structured finance obligations at year end

  85    72    27  

Average funded investments in new portfolio companies/structured finance obligations

  12,996    10,597    6,751  

Total return based on net asset value(1)

  5.41  3.55  (2.90%) 

Weighted average yield of first lien and second lien debt at fair value(2)

  7.75  6.58  6.88

Weighted average yield of first lien and second lien debt at amortized cost(2)

  7.66  6.51  6.85

(1)

Total return is based on the change in net asset value per share during the year plus the declared dividends, assuming reinvestment of dividends in accordance with the dividend reinvestment plan, divided by the beginning net asset value for the year. Total return based on change in net asset value for the year ended December 31, 2013 was calculated for the period from commencement of operations through December 31, 2013. Total return for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was inclusive of $0.11, $0.09,

and $0.32, respectively, per share increase in net asset value related to the offering price of subscriptions. Excluding the effects of the higher offering price of subscriptions, total return would have been 4.83%, 3.09%, and (4.50%), respectively (refer to Note 8 in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information).
(2)Weighted average yields do not include the effect of accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and are based on interest rates as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Actual yields earned over the life of each investment could differ materially from the yields presented above.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 8 of thisForm 10-K “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to those described in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K “Risk Factors.” Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “GMS Finance,” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation formed on February 8, 2012, and structured as an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company. On May 2, 2013, GMS Finance filed its election to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the “Investment Company Act”). GMS Finance has elected to be treated, and intends to continue to comply withadopt the requirements to qualify annually, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”).

GMS Finance’s investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation primarily through debt investments in U.S. middle market companies, which we define as companies with approximately $10 million to $100 million of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). GMS Finance seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in first lien senior secured loans (which may include stand-alone first lien loans; “last out” first lien loans, which are loans that have a secondary priority behind “first out” first lien loans; “unitranche” loans, which are loans that combine features of first lien, second lien or subordinated loans, generally in a first lien position; and secured corporate bonds with features similar to the features of these categories of first lien loans) and second lien senior secured loans (which may include senior secured loans, and, to a lesser extent, secured corporate bonds, with a secondary priority behind first lien loans) (collectively, “Middle Market Senior Loans”). The Middle Market Senior Loans are generally made to private U.S. middle market companies that are, in many cases, controlled by private equity firms. Depending on market conditions, GMS Finance expects that between 70% and 80% of the value of its assets will be invested in Middle Market Senior Loans, with the balance invested in higher-yielding investments, which may include middle market junior loans such as corporate mezzanine loans, equity co-investments, broadly syndicated first lien and second lien senior secured loans, high-yield bonds, structured finance obligations and/or other opportunistic investments. We expect that the composition of our portfolio will change over time given our Investment Adviser’s view on, among other things, the economic and credit environment (including with respect to interest rates) in which we are operating.

GMS Finance is externally managed by the Investment Adviser, an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. The Administrator provides the administrative services necessary for GMS Finance to operate. Both the Investment Adviser and the Administrator are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., a subsidiary of The Carlyle Group L.P. “Carlyle” refers to The Carlyle Group L.P., its affiliates and its consolidated subsidiaries, a global alternative asset manager publicly traded on NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CG”. Refer to the sec.gov website for further information on Carlyle.

On February 29, 2016, the Company and Credit Partners USA LLC (“Credit Partners”) entered into a Limited Liability Company agreement to co-manage Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC (“Credit Fund”). Credit Fund will primarily invest in first lien loans of middle-market companies. Credit Fund is managed by a six-member board of managers, on which the Company and Credit Partners each have equal representation. The Company and Credit Partners each have 50% economic ownership of Credit Fund and have commitments to fund, from time to time, capital of up to $400 million each.

Investments

Our level of investment activity can and does vary substantially from period to period depending on many factors, including the amount of debt available to middle market companies, the general economic environment and the competitive environment for the type of investments we make.

Revenue

We generate revenue primarily in the form of interest and fee income on debt investments we hold and capital gains, if any, on investments. Our debt investments generally have a stated term of five to eight years and generally bear interest at a floating rate usually determined on the basis of a benchmark such as LIBOR. Interest on these debt securities is generally paid quarterly. In some instances, we receive payments on our debt investments based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our debt investments prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments fluctuates significantly from period to period. Our portfolio activity also reflects the proceeds of sales of securities. We may also generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, amendment, structuring or due diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance and consulting fees.

Expenses

Our primary operating expenses include the payment of: (i) investment advisory fees, including base management fees and incentive fees, to our Investment Adviser pursuant to an investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) between us and our Investment Adviser; (ii) costs and other expenses and our allocable portion of overhead incurred by our Administrator in performing its administrative obligations under an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) between us and our Administrator; and (iii) other operating expenses as detailed below:

our initial organization costs and offering costs incurred prior to the filing of our election to be regulated as a BDC (the amount in excess of $1,500 to be paid by our Investment Adviser);

the costs associated with the Private Offering;

the costs of any other offerings of our common stock and other securities, if any;

calculating individual asset values and our net asset value (including the cost and expenses of any independent valuation firms);

expenses, including travel expenses, incurred by the Investment Adviser, or members of the Investment Adviser team managing our investments, or payable to third parties, performing due diligence on prospective portfolio companies and, if necessary, expenses of enforcing our rights;

the base management fee and any incentive fee payable under our Investment Advisory Agreement;

certain costs and expenses relating to distributions paid on our shares;

administration fees payable under our Administration Agreement and sub-administration agreements, including related expenses;

debt service and other costs of borrowings or other financing arrangements;

the allocated costs incurred by the Investment Adviser in providing managerial assistance to those portfolio companies that request it;

amounts payable to third parties relating to, or associated with, making or holding investments;

the costs associated with subscriptions to data service, research-related subscriptions and expenses and quotation equipment and services used in making or holding investments;

transfer agent and custodial fees;

costs of hedging;

commissions and other compensation payable to brokers or dealers;

federal and state registration fees;

any U.S. federal, state and local taxes, including any excise taxes;

Independent Director fees and expenses;

costs of preparing financial statements and maintaining books and records, costs of preparing tax returns, costs of Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance and attestation and costs of filing reports or other documents with the SEC (or other regulatory bodies), and other reporting and compliance costs, including registration and listing fees, and the compensation of professionals responsible for the preparation or review of the foregoing;

the costs of any reports, proxy statements or other notices to our stockholders (including printing and mailing costs), the costs of any stockholders’ meetings and the compensation of investor relations personnel responsible for the preparation of the foregoing and related matters;

the costs of specialty and custom software for monitoring risk, compliance and overall portfolio, including any development costs incurred prior to the filing of our election to be regulated as a BDC;

our fidelity bond;

directors and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance, and any other insurance premiums;

indemnification payments;

direct fees and expenses associated with independent audits, agency, consulting and legal costs; and

all other expenses incurred by us or the Administrator in connection with administering our business, including our allocable share of certain officers and their staff compensation.

We expect our general and administrative expenses to be relatively stable or to decline as a percentage of total assets during periods of asset growth and to increase during periods of asset declines.

PORTFOLIO AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

The fair value of our investments was approximately $1,052,666, comprised of 85 portfolio companies/structured finance obligations as of December 31, 2015. The fair value of our investments was approximately $698,662 comprised of 72 portfolios companies/structured finance obligations as of December 31, 2014. The fair value of our investments was approximately $212,807 comprised of 27 portfolio companies/structured finance obligations as of December 31, 2013.

The Company’s investment activity for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is presented below (information presented herein is at amortized cost unless otherwise indicated):

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015  2014  2013 

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated:

    

Total Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated as of January 1

  $707,701   $213,128   $—   

New Investments purchased

   597,811    614,622    216,445  

Net accretion of discount on securities

   3,035    1,108    65  

Net realized gain (loss) on investments

   1,164    72    63  

Investments sold or repaid

   (229,991  (121,229  (3,445
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated as of December 31

  $1,079,720   $707,701   $213,128  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Principal amount of investments funded:

    

First Lien Debt

  $481,510   $457,212   $143,396  

Second Lien Debt

   115,250    80,790    41,000  

Structured Finance Obligations

   15,760    115,638    55,882  

Equity Investments

   1,507    —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $614,027   $653,640   $240,278  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Principal amount of investments sold or repaid:

    

First Lien Debt

  $(191,718 $(77,040 $(485

Second Lien Debt

   (8,000  (9,500  —   

Structured Finance Obligations

   (39,475  (31,363  (8,000
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $(239,193 $(117,903 $(8,485
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Number of new funded investments

   46    58    32  

Average new funded investment amount

  $12,996   $10,597   $6,751  

Percentage of new funded debt investments at floating rates

   98  98  100

Percentage of new funded debt investments at fixed rates

   2  2  0

As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated consisted of the following:

   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014   December 31, 2013 
   Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value   Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value   Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value 

First Lien Debt

  $800,857    $795,034    $517,450    $514,787    $141,510    $141,676  

Second Lien Debt

   216,708     210,396     111,261     107,874     40,636     39,767  

Structured Finance Obligations

   59,940     44,812     78,990     76,001     30,982     31,364  

Equity Investments

   2,215     2,424     —       —       —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,079,720    $1,052,666    $707,701    $698,662    $213,128    $212,807  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The weighted average yields (1) for our first and second lien debt, based on the amortized cost and fair value as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were as follows:

   December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014  December 31, 2013 
   Amortized
Cost
  Fair Value  Amortized
Cost
  Fair Value  Amortized
Cost
  Fair Value 

First Lien Debt

   7.14  7.19  6.01  6.04  6.24  6.23

Second Lien Debt

   9.59  9.87  8.86  9.14  8.97  9.16

(1)Weighted average yields do not include the effect of accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and are based on interest rates as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Actual yields earned over the life of each investment could differ materially from the yields presented above.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

The net increase or decrease in net assets from operations may vary substantially from period to period as a result of various factors, including the recognition of realized gains and losses and net change in unrealized appreciation and depreciation.

Investment Income

Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, was as follows:

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Interest income from non-controlled/non-affiliated investments:

      

First Lien Debt

  $45,654    $18,028    $2,837  

Second Lien Debt

   15,357     5,716     648  

Structured Finance Obligations

   8,160     9,233     1,474  

Equity Investments

   12     —       —    

Cash

   7     7     10  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment income

  $69,190    $32,984    $4,969  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The increase in interest income for the year ended December 31, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 was primarily driven by our deployment of capital and increasing invested balance. As of December 31, 2015, the size of our portfolio increased to $1,079,720 from $707,701 as of December 31, 2014, at amortized cost, and total principal amount of investments outstanding increased to $1,142,364 from $767,530 as of December 31, 2014. The increase in interest income was also due to the increase in the weighted average yield. As of December 31, 2015, the weighted average yield of our first and second lien debt increased to 7.66% from 6.51% as of December 31, 2014, on amortized cost.

The increase in interest income for the year ended December 31, 2014 from the comparable period in 2013 was primarily driven by our deployment of capital and increasing invested balance. As of December 31, 2014, the size of our portfolio increased to $707,701 from $213,128 as of December 31, 2013, at amortized cost, and total principal amount of investments outstanding increased to $767,530 from $231,793 as of December 31, 2013. The increase in interest income was partially offset by a decline in the weighted average yield. As of December 31, 2014, the weighted average yield of our first and second lien debt decreased to 6.51% from 6.85% as of December 31, 2013, on amortized cost.

Interest income on our first and second lien debt investments is dependent on the composition and credit quality of the portfolio. Generally, we expect the portfolio to generate predictable quarterly interest income based on the terms stated in each loan’s credit agreement. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and for the years then ended, all of our first and second lien debt investments were performing and current on their interest payments. Interest income from structured finance obligations is recorded based upon an estimation of an effective yield to expected maturity utilizing assumed cash flows. The effective yield is updated periodically based on payments received and expected future payments. In estimating these cash flows, there are a number of assumptions that are subject to uncertainties, including the amount and timing of principal payments which are impacted by prepayments, repurchases, defaults, delinquencies and liquidations of or within the CLO funds. These uncertainties are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that could have impacted the Company’s estimates if the information was known at the time. As a result, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Net investment income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Total investment income

  $69,190    $32,984    $4,969  

Net expenses

   (33,666   (18,724   (6,638
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

  $35,524    $14,260    $(1,669
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expenses

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Base management fees

  $13,361    $6,559    $937  

Incentive fees

   8,881     3,578     —    

Organization expenses

   —       —       1,426  

Professional fees

   1,845     2,169     1,723  

Administrative service fees

   595     626     650  

Interest expense

   9,582     3,648     353  

Credit facility fees

   1,898     3,052     1,164  

Directors’ fees and expenses

   419     395     322  

Transfer agency fees

   177     135     84  

Trustees fees

   41     —       —    

Other general and administrative

   1,321     748     291  

Waiver of base management fees

   (4,454   (2,186   (312
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net expenses

  $33,666    $18,724    $6,638  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense and credit facility fees for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were comprised of the following:

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Interest expense

  $9,582    $3,648    $353  

Facility unused commitment fee

   847     1,129     602  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   945     1,820     513  

Other fees

   106     103     49  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense and credit facility fees

  $11,480    $6,700    $1,517  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest expense

  $8,083    $2,882    $94  

The increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the comparable period in 2014 was driven by increased usage of the credit facilities, additional debt issued through the securitization in the form of the 2015-1 Notes (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information), and increased deployment of capital to investments. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the average interest rate increased to 2.23% from 2.18% for the comparable period in 2014, and average principal debt outstanding increased to $265,277 from $164,980 for the comparable period in 2014.

The increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the comparable period in 2013 was driven by increased usage of the credit facilities and increased deployment of capital to investments. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2014, $827 of the amortization of deferred financing costs represents the prorated financing costs that were immediately expensed in lieu of continuing to amortize over the term of the Revolving Credit Facility related to the amendment that reduced commitments in the Revolving Credit Facility. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the average interest rate increased to 2.18% from 1.98% for the period from August 8, 2013 (the initial date on which the Company borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility) through December 31, 2013, and average principal debt outstanding increased to $164,980 from $44,063 for the period in 2013.

The increase in base management fees (and related waiver of base management fees) and incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2014 from the comparable period in 2013 was driven by our deployment of capital and increasing invested balance. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, base management fees were $8,907, $4,373 and $625, respectively (net of waiver of $4,454, $2,186 and $312, respectively), incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net investment income were $8,881, $3,578 and $0, respectively, and there were no incentive fees related to realized capital gains. For the year ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 we recorded no accrued capital gains incentive fees based upon our cumulative net realized and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The accrual for any capital gains incentive fee under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) in a given period may result in an additional expense if such cumulative amount is greater than in the prior period or a reduction of previously recorded expense if such cumulative amount is less than in the prior period. If such cumulative amount is negative, then there is no accrual. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information on the incentive and base management fees.

Organization expenses include expenses incurred in the initial formation of the Company. Professional fees include legal, rating agencies, audit, tax, valuation, technology and other professional fees incurred related to the management of the Company. Administrative service fees represent fees paid to the Administrator for our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including our allocable portion of the cost of certain of our executive officers and their respective staff. Other general and administrative expenses include insurance, filing, research, subscriptions and other costs. The increase in other general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 from the comparable period in 2014 and for the year ended in December 31, 2014 from the comparable period in 2013 was primarily driven by the increased deployment of capital.

Net Realized Gain (Loss) and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company had realized gains on 8, 4, and 11, investments, respectively, totaling approximately $1,622, $391, and $63, respectively, which was offset by realized losses on 6, 3, and 0, investments, respectively, totaling approximately $458, $319, and $0, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a change in unrealized appreciation on 48, 25, and 16 investments, respectively, totaling approximately $8,597, $2,931, and $1,509, respectively, which was offset by a change in unrealized depreciation on 71, 65, and 13 investments, respectively, totaling approximately $26,612, $11,649, and $1,830, respectively.

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were as follows:

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Net realized gain (loss) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

  $1,164    $72    $63  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   (18,015   (8,718   (321
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

  $(16,851  $(8,646  $(258
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) by the type of investments for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2015  2014  2013 

Type

  Net realized
gain (loss)
   Net change in
unrealized
appreciation

(depreciation)
  Net realized
gain (loss)
  Net change in
unrealized
appreciation
(depreciation)
  Net realized
gain (loss)
   Net change in
unrealized
appreciation
(depreciation)
 

First Lien Debt

  $208   $(3,160 $—    $(2,829 $3   $166  

Second Lien Debt

   —      (2,925  120    (2,518  —       (869

Structured Finance Obligations

   956     (12,139  (48  (3,371  60     382  

Equity Investments

   —      209   —     —     —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,164    $(18,015 $72   $(8,718 $63    $(321
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized depreciation in our investments for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the comparable period in 2014 was primarily due to a widening spread environment during the last three months of the year. Net change in unrealized depreciation in our investments for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the comparable period in 2013 was also primarily due to a widening spread environment during the last six months of the year.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company generates cash from the net proceeds of offerings of our common stock and through cash flows from operations, including investment sales and repayments as well as income earned on investments and cash equivalents. We may also fund a portion of our investments through borrowings under the Borrower Sub’s senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and/or the Company’s senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Facility”), as well as through securitization of a portion of our existing investments.

The Borrower Sub closed on May 24, 2013 on the Revolving Credit Facility, which was subsequently amended on June 30, 2014 and further amended on June 19, 2015. The Revolving Credit Facility provides for secured borrowings during the applicable revolving period up to an amount equal to the lesser of $400,000 (the borrowing base as calculated pursuant to the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility) and the amount of net cash proceeds and unpledged capital commitments the Company has received, with an accordion feature that can, subject to certain conditions, increase the aggregate maximum credit commitment up to an amount not to exceed $750,000, subject to restrictions imposed on borrowings under the Investment Company Act and certain restrictions and conditions set forth in the Revolving Credit Facility, including adequate collateral to support such

borrowings. The Revolving Credit Facility imposes financial and operating covenants on us and the Borrower Sub that restrict our and its business activities. Continued compliance with these covenants will depend on many factors, some of which are beyond our control.

The Company closed on March 21, 2014 on the Facility, which was subsequently amendedASU on January 8, 2015. The maximum principal amount of the Facility is $150,000, subject to availability under the Facility,1, 2018, which is based on certain advance rates multiplied by the value of the Company’s portfolio investments (subject to certain concentration limitations) net of certain other indebtedness that the Company may incur in accordance with the terms of the Facility. Proceeds of the Facility may be used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of portfolio investments. Maximum capacity under the Facility may be increased to $225,000 through the exercise by the Company of an uncommitted accordion feature through which existing and new lenders may, at their option, agree to provide additional financing. The Facility includes a $20,000 limit for swingline loans and a $5,000 limit for letters of credit. Subject to certain exceptions, the Facility is secured by a first lien security interest in substantially all of the portfolio investments held by the Company. The Facility includes customary covenants, including certain financial covenants related to asset coverage, shareholders’ equity and liquidity, certain limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens, and other maintenance covenants, as well as usual and customary events of default for senior secured revolving credit facilities of this nature.

Although we believe that we and the Borrower Sub will remain in compliance, there are no assurances that we or the Borrower Sub will continue to comply with the covenants in the Facility and Revolving Credit Facility, as applicable. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default under the Facility and/or Revolving Credit Facility that, if we or the Borrower Sub were unable to obtain a waiver from the applicable lenders, could result in the immediate acceleration of the amounts due under the Facility and/or Revolving Credit Facility, and therebydid not have a material adverse impact on our business,the Company’s consolidated financial conditionstatements.


In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 clarifies the presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows by requiring the amounts described as restricted cash be included with cash and resultscash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of operations.

For more informationperiod and end of period total amounts shown on the Revolving Credit Facilitystatement of cash flows. If cash and Facility, see Note 5cash equivalents and restricted cash are presented separately on the



statement of financial position, a reconciliation of these separate line items to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The primary use of existing funds and any funds raised in the future is expected to be for investments in portfolio companies, repayment of indebtedness,total cash distributions to our stockholders and for other general corporate purposes.

On June 26, 2015, the Company completed a $400 million term debt securitization (the “2015-1 Debt Securitization”). The notes offered in the Debt Securitization (the “2015-1 Notes”) were issued by Carlyle GMS Finance MM CLO 2015-1 LLC (the “2015-1 Issuer”), a wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary of the Company, and are secured by a diversified portfolio of the 2015-1 Issuer consisting primarily of first and second lien senior secured loans. The 2015-1 Debt Securitization was executed through a private placement of the 2015-1 Notes, consisting of $160 million of Aaa/AAA Class A-1A Notes, which bear interest at the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.85%; $40 million of Aaa/AAA Class A-1B Notes, which bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 1.75% for the first 24 months and the three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% thereafter; $27 million of Aaa/AAA Class A-1C Notes, which bear interest at 3.75%; and $46 million of Aa2 Class A-2 Notes which bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.70%. The 2015-1 Notes were issued at par and are scheduled to mature on July 15, 2027. The Company received 100% of the preferred interests (the “Preferred Interests”) issued by the 2015-1 Issuer on the closing date of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization in exchange for the Company’s contribution to the Issuer of the initial closing date loan portfolio. The Preferred Interests do not bear interest and had a nominal value of $125.9 million at closing. In connection with the contribution, the Company made customary representations, warranties and covenants to the 2015-1 Issuer. The Class A-1A, Class A-1B and Class A-1C and Class A-2 Notes areamount included in the statement of cash flows will be required either in the footnotes or on the face of the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods, and the interim periods within those periods, beginning after December 31, 201515, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company has elected to adopt the ASU on January 1, 2018, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Preferred Interests were eliminated in consolidation. For more information on the 2015-1 Notes, see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had $41,837 and $8,754, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. The facilities of the Company and the Borrower Sub consisted of the following as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:

   December 31, 2015 
   Total
Facility
   Borrowings
Outstanding
   Unused
Portion(1)
   Amount
Available (2)
 

Revolving Credit Facility

  $400,000    $170,313    $229,687    $3,155  

Facility

   150,000     64,000     86,000     86,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $550,000    $234,313    $315,687    $89,155  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   December 31, 2014 
   Total
Facility
   Borrowings
Outstanding
   Unused
Portion(1)
   Amount
Available (2)
 

Revolving Credit Facility

  $400,000    $246,441    $153,559    $10,557  

Facility

   150,000     62,000     88,000     58,623  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $550,000    $308,441    $241,559    $69,180  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   December 31, 2013 
   Total
Facility
   Borrowings
Outstanding
   Unused
Portion(1)
   Amount
Available (2)
 

Revolving Credit Facility

  $500,000    $66,822    $433,178    $18,616  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $500,000    $66,822    $433,178    $18,616  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)The unused portion is the amount upon which commitment fees are based.
(2)Available for borrowing based on the computation of collateral to support the borrowings.

The following were the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s 2015-1 Notes as of December 31, 2015. No 2015-1 Notes were outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

   December 31, 2015 
   Carrying Value   Fair Value 

Aaa/AAA Class A-1A Notes

  $160,000    $157,200  

Aaa/AAA Class A-1B Notes

   40,000     39,700  

Aaa/AAA Class A-1C Notes

   27,000     26,823  

Aa2 Class A-2 Notes

   46,000     45,122  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $273,000    $268,845  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity Activity

There were $44,818 and $252,114 of commitments made to the Company during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had $1,174,340 and $1,129,522, respectively, in total capital commitments from stockholders, of which $559,214 and $776,750, respectively, was unfunded. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, certain current directors had committed $1,541 and $1,500, respectively, in capital commitments to the Company.

Shares issued as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, were 31,524,083 and 17,932,697, respectively.

The following table summarizes activity in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013:

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Shares outstanding, beginning of year

   17,932,697     9,575,990     100  

Common stock issued

   13,584,508     8,354,987     9,575,890  

Reinvestment of dividends

   6,878     1,720     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Shares outstanding, end of year

   31,524,083     17,932,697     9,575,990  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Contractual Obligations

A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations was as follows as of December 31, 2015:

Payment Due by Period

  Revolving Credit
Facility and Facility
   2015-1 Notes 

Less than 1 Year

  $—     $—   

1-3 Years

   —      —   

3-5 Years

   64,000     —   

More than 5 Years

   170,313     273,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $234,313    $273,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

For more information on the Revolving Credit Facility and Facility and 2015-1 Notes, see Note 5 and Note 6, respectively, to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $170,313 and $246,441, respectively, of secured borrowings were outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility, and $64,000 and $62,000, respectively, were outstanding under the Facility and $273,000 and $0, respectively, of 2015-1 Notes were outstanding. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we incurred $9,582, $3,648 and $353, respectively, of interest expense and $847, $1,129 and $602, respectively, of unused commitment fees.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company enters into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. The Company believes that the likelihood of such an event is remote; however, the maximum potential exposure is unknown. No accrual has been made in these consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for any such exposure.

We have in the past and may in the future enter into funding commitments such as revolving credit facilities, bridge financing commitments, or delayed draw commitments.

The Company had the following unfunded commitments to fund delayed draw and revolving senior secured loans as of the indicated dates:

   Par Value as of 
   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014 

Unfunded delayed draw commitments

  $20,695    $9,500  

Unfunded revolving term loan commitments

   3,906     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total unfunded commitments

  $24,601    $9,500  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pursuant to an undertaking by the Company in connection with the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, the Company agreed to hold on an ongoing basis Preferred Interests with an aggregate dollar purchase price at least equal to 5% of the aggregate outstanding amount of all collateral obligations by the 2015-1 Issuer for so long as any securities of the 2015-1 Issuer remains outstanding. As of December 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with its undertaking.

DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of any distributions on behalf of its stockholders, for those who have elected to participate in the plan. As a result of adopting such a plan, if the Board of Directors authorizes, and GMS Finance declares a cash dividend or distribution, the stockholders who have elected to participate in the dividend reinvestment plan would have their cash dividends or distributions automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock, rather than receiving cash. Prior to a Qualified IPO, the Company intends to use primarily newly issued shares of its common stock to implement the plan issued at the net asset value per share most recently determined by the Board of Directors. After a Qualified IPO, the Company intends to use primarily newly issued shares to implement the plan so long as the market value per share is equal to or greater than the net asset value per share as of the close of business on the relevant payment date for such dividend or distribution. If the market value per share is less than the net asset value per share as of the close of business on the relevant payment date, the plan administrator would purchase the common stock on behalf of participants in the open market, unless the Company instructs the plan administrator otherwise.

The following table summarizes the Company’s dividends declared since inception through March 11, 2016:

Date

Declared

  

Record

Date

  

Payment

Date

  Per Share
Amount
  Total
Amount
   Annualized
Dividend Yield(1)
 

March 13, 2014

  March 31, 2014  April 14, 2014  $0.19   $2,449     4.76

June 26, 2014

  June 30, 2014  July 14, 2014  $0.27   $3,481     5.52

September 12, 2014

  September 18, 2014  October 9, 2014  $0.44   $5,956     9.23

December 19, 2014

  December 29, 2014  January 26, 2015  $0.35   $6,276     8.17

March 11, 2015

  March 13, 2015  April 17, 2015  $0.37   $7,833     8.58

June 24, 2015

  June 30, 2015  July 22, 2015  $0.37   $9,902     9.03

September 24, 2015

  September 24, 2015  October 22, 2015  $0.42   $11,670     8.91

December 29, 2015

  December 29, 2015  January 22, 2016  $0.40   $12,610     8.97

December 29, 2015

  December 29, 2015  January 22, 2016  $0.18(2)  $5,674     4.03

March 10, 2016

  March 14, 2016  April 22, 2016(3)  $0.40   $13,337     9.26

(1)Annualized dividend yield is calculated by dividing the declared dividend by the weighted average of the net asset value at the beginning of the quarter and the capital called during the quarter and annualizing over 4 quarterly periods.
(2)Represents a special dividend.
(3)Payable on or about April 22, 2016.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets, and any other parameters used in determining such estimates could cause actual results to differ. Our critical accounting policies, including those relating to the valuation of our investment portfolio, are described below. The critical accounting policies should be read in connection with our “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K.

Fair Value Measurements

3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company applies fair value accounting in accordance with the terms of Financial Accounting Standards Board ASCAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820,Fair Value Measurement(“ (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value as the amount that would be exchanged to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transfer between market participants at the measurement date. The Company values securities/instruments traded in active markets on the measurement date by multiplying the closing price of such traded securities/instruments by the quantity of shares or amount of the instrument held. The Company may also obtain quotes with respect to certain of its investments, such as its securities/instruments traded in active markets and its liquid securities/instruments that are not traded in active markets, from pricing services, brokers, or counterparties (i.e., “consensus pricing”). When doing so, the Company determines whether the quote obtained is sufficient according to US GAAP to determine the fair value of the security. The Company may use the quote obtained or alternative pricing sources may be utilized including valuation techniques typically utilized for illiquid securities/instruments.

Securities/instruments that are illiquid or for which the pricing source does not provide a valuation or methodology or provides a valuation or methodology that, in the judgment of the Investment Adviser or the Company’s Board of Directors, does not represent fair value shall each be valued as of the measurement date using all techniques appropriate under the circumstances and for which sufficient data is available. These valuation techniques may vary by investment and include comparable public market valuations, comparable precedent transaction valuations and/or discounted cash flow analyses. The process generally used to determine the applicable value is as follows: (i) the value of each portfolio company or investment is initially reviewed by the investment professionals responsible for such portfolio company or investment and, for non-traded investments, a standardized template designed to approximate fair market value based on observable market inputs, updated credit statistics and unobservable inputs is used to determine a preliminary value, which is also reviewed alongside consensus pricing, where available; (ii) preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and reviewed by a valuation committee comprised of members of senior management; (iii) the Board of Directors engages a third-party valuation firm to provide positive assurance on portions of the Middle Market Senior Loans and equity investments portfolio each quarter (such that each non-traded investment other than Credit Fund is reviewed by a third-party valuation firm at least once on a rolling twelve month basis) including a review of management’s preliminary valuation and conclusion on fair value; (iv) the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) reviews the assessments of the Investment Adviser and the third-party valuation firm and provides the Board of Directors with any recommendations with respect to changes to the fair value of each investment in the portfolio; and (v) the Board of Directors discusses the valuation recommendations of the Audit Committee and determines the fair value of each investment in the portfolio in good faith based on the input of the Investment Adviser and, where applicable, the third-party valuation firm.

All factors that might materially impact the value of an investment are considered, including, but not limited to the assessment of the following factors, as relevant:

the nature and realizable value of any collateral;

call features, put features and other relevant terms of debt;

the portfolio company’s leverage and ability to make payments;

the portfolio company’s public or private credit rating;

the portfolio company’s actual and expected earnings and discounted cash flow;

prevailing interest rates and spreads for similar securities and expected volatility in future interest rates;

the markets in which the portfolio company does business and recent economic and/or market events; and

comparisons to comparable transactions and publicly traded securities.

Investment performance data utilized are the most recently available financial statements and compliance certificatecertificates received from the portfolio companies as of the measurement date which in many cases may reflect a lag in information.



Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments may fluctuate from period to period. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, these estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been reported had a ready market for the investments existed, and it is reasonably possible that the difference could be material.

In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the realized gains or losses on investments to be different from the net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation currently reflected in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152017, 2016 and 2014.

2015.

US GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework which ranks the level of observability of market price inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment and state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Investments with readily available quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from quoted prices in active markets generally have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment applied in determining fair value.

Investments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed based on the observability of inputs used in determination of fair values, as follows:

Level I—1—inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. The types of financial instruments included in Level I1 generally include unrestricted securities, including equities and derivatives, listed in active markets. The Company does not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where the Company holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.

Level II—2—inputs to the valuation methodology are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date and are those other than quoted prices in active markets. The type of financial instruments in this category generally includes less liquid and restricted securities listed in active markets, securities traded in other than active markets, government and agency securities, and certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on observable inputs.

Level III—3—inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to overall fair value measurement. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are included in this category generally include investments in privately-held entities, collateralized loan obligations,CLOs, and certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on unobservable inputs.


In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. The Investment Adviser’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment.

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the quarteryear in which the transfers occur.

For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no transfers between levels.



The following tables summarize the Company’s investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 December 31, 2017
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets       
First Lien Debt$
 $
 $1,531,276
 $1,531,276
Second Lien Debt
 
 246,233
 246,233
Equity Investments
 
 17,506
 17,506
Investment Fund       
Mezzanine Loan
 
 85,750
 85,750
Subtotal$
 $
 $1,880,765
 $1,880,765
Investments measured at net asset value (1)
      $86,766
Total      $1,967,531
 
 December 31, 2016
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets       
First Lien Debt$
 $
 $1,139,548
 $1,139,548
Second Lien Debt
 
 171,864
 171,864
Structured Finance Obligations
 
 5,216
 5,216
Equity Investments
 
 6,474
 6,474
Investment Fund       
Mezzanine Loan
 
 62,384
 62,384
Subtotal$
 $
 $1,385,486
 $1,385,486
Investments measured at net asset value (1)

      $37,273
Total      $1,422,759
(1)Amount represents the Company’s subordinated loan and member’s interest investments in Credit Fund. The fair value of these investments has been estimated using the net asset value of the Company’s ownership interests in Credit Fund.



The changes in the Company’s investments at fair value for which the Company has used Level 3 inputs to determine fair value and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings for Level 3 investments still held are as follows:
 Financial Assets
 For the year ended December 31, 2017
 First Lien Debt Second Lien Debt Structured Finance Obligations Equity Investments Investment Fund - Mezzanine Loan Total
Balance, beginning of year$1,139,548
 $171,864
 $5,216
 $6,474
 $62,384
 $1,385,486
Purchases968,783
 175,763
 
 8,818
 135,960
 1,289,324
Sales(201,994) (12,377) 
 
 
 (214,371)
Paydowns(371,499) (94,891) (6,147) (346) (112,594) (585,477)
Accretion of discount9,955
 1,792
 
 
 
 11,747
Net realized gains (losses)(8,240) (360) (3,092) 
 
 (11,692)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)(5,277) 4,442
 4,023
 2,560
 
 5,748
Balance, end of year$1,531,276
 $246,233
 $
 $17,506
 $85,750
 $1,880,765
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings related to investments still held as of December 31, 2017 included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations$(9,040) $3,672
 $
 $2,560
 
 $(2,808)
 Financial Assets
 For the year ended December 31, 2016
 First Lien Debt Second Lien Debt Structured Finance Obligations Equity Investments Investment Fund - Mezzanine Loan Total
Balance, beginning of year$785,459
 $210,396
 $44,812
 $2,424
 $
 $1,043,091
Purchases594,633
 38,380
 
 2,857
 84,784
 720,654
Sales(77,434) (25,398) (33,327) 
 
 (136,159)
Paydowns(167,699) (57,855) (7,041) 
 (22,400) (254,995)
Accretion of discount4,757
 850
 (31) 
 
 5,576
Net realized gains (losses)(40) 275
 (10,302) 
 
 (10,067)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)(128) 5,216
 11,105
 1,193
 
 17,386
Balance, end of year$1,139,548
 $171,864
 $5,216
 $6,474
 $62,384
 $1,385,486
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings related to investments still held as of December 31, 2016 included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations$(1,000) $3,331
 $1,372
 $1,193
 $
 $4,896

The Company generally uses the following framework when determining the fair value of investments that are categorized as Level III:

3:

Investments in debt securities are initially evaluated to determine whether the enterprise value of the portfolio company is greater than the applicable debt. The enterprise value of the portfolio company is estimated using a market approach and an income approach. The market approach utilizes market value (EBITDA) multiples of publicly traded comparable companies and available precedent sales transactions of comparable companies. The Company carefully considers numerous factors when selecting the appropriate companies whose multiples are used to value its portfolio companies. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type of organization, similarity to the business being valued, relevant risk factors, as well as size, profitability and growth expectations. The income approach typically uses a discounted cash flow analysis of the portfolio company.



Investments in debt securities that do not have sufficient coverage through the enterprise value analysis are valued based on an expected probability of default and discount recovery analysis.

Investments in debt securities with sufficient coverage through the enterprise value analysis are generally valued using a discounted cash flow analysis of the underlying security. Projected cash flows in the discounted cash flow typically represent the relevant security’s contractual interest, fees and principal payments plus the assumption of full principal recovery at the investment’ssecurity’s expected maturity date. The discount rate to be used is determined using an average of two market-based methodologies. Investments in debt securities may also be valued using consensus pricing.

Investments in structured finance obligations are generally valued using a discounted cash flow and/or consensus pricing.

Investments in equities are generally valued using a market approach and/or an income approach. The market approach utilizes EBITDA multiples of publicly traded comparable companies and available precedent sales transactions of comparable companies. The income approach typically uses a discounted cash flow analysis of the portfolio company.

Investments in the subordinated loan and member’s interest of the investment fund are valued using the net asset value of the Company’s ownership interest in the investment fund and investments in the mezzanine loan of the investment fund are valued using discounted cash flow analysis with expected repayment rate of principal and interest.
The following tables summarize the quantitative information related to the significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 instruments which are carried at fair value as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 Fair Value as Valuation Techniques Significant Unobservable Inputs Range Weighted Average
 of December 31, 2017Low High 
Investments in First Lien Debt$1,369,558
 Discounted Cash Flow Discount Rate 4.85% 17.40% 8.18%
 142,231
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes 59.17
 100.83
 95.93
 19,487
 Income Approach Discount Rate 9.78% 9.78% 9.78%
   Market Approach Comparable Multiple 8.33x
 8.33x
 8.33x
Total First Lien Debt1,531,276
          
Investments in Second Lien Debt211,365
 Discounted Cash Flow Discount Rate 7.61% 18.26% 9.43%
 34,868
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes 96.83
 100.58
 99.23
Total Second Lien Debt246,233
          
Investments in Equity17,506
 Income Approach Discount Rate 7.60% 10.61% 8.81%
   Market Approach Comparable Multiple 7.80x
 14.69x
 10.41x
Total Equity Investments17,506
          
Investments in Investment Fund – Mezzanine Loan85,750
 Income Approach Repayment Rate 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Total Investment Fund – Mezzanine Loan85,750
          
Total Level 3 Investments$1,880,765
          



 Fair Value as Valuation Techniques Significant Unobservable Inputs Range Weighted Average
 of December 31,
2016
Low High 
Investments in First Lien Debt$986,695
 Discounted Cash Flow Discount Rate 4.50% 16.33% 7.94%
 152,853
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes 40.75
 106.36
 97.29
Total First Lien Debt1,139,548
          
Investments in Second Lien Debt153,657
 Discounted Cash Flow Discount Rate 7.93% 11.05% 9.75%
 16,525
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes 83.17
 100.88
 94.48
 1,682
 Income Approach Discount Rate 15.32% 15.32% 15.32%
   Market Approach Comparable
Multiple
 8.01x
 8.68x
 8.34x
Total Second Lien Debt171,864
          
Investments in Structured Finance Obligations2,761
 Discounted Cash Flow Discount Rate 22.00% 22.00% 22.00%
     Default Rate 1.13
 1.13
 1.13
     Prepayment Rate 35.00
 35.00
 35.00
     Recovery Rate 65.00
 65.00
 65.00
 2,455
 Consensus Pricing Indicative Quotes 0.10
 48.79
 48.50
Total Structured Finance Obligations5,216
          
Investments in Equity6,474
 Income Approach Discount Rate 8.68% 10.40% 9.41%
   Market Approach Comparable
Multiple
 7.22x
 13.71x
 11.00x
Total Equity Investments6,474
          
Investments in Investment Fund – Mezzanine Loan62,384
 Income Approach Repayment Rate 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Total Investment Fund – Mezzanine Loan62,384
          
Total Level 3 Investments$1,385,486
          
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments in first and second lien debt securities are discount rates, indicative quotes and indicative quotes.comparable EBITDA multiples. Significant increases in discount rates would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Significant decreases in indicative quotes or comparable EBITDA multiples in isolation may result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments in structured finance obligations are discount rates, default rates, prepayment rates, recovery rates and indicative quotes. Significant increases in discount rates, default rates or prepayment rates in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement, while a significant increase in recovery rates in isolation would result in a significantly higher fair value. Significant decreases in indicative quotes in isolation may result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments in equities are discount rates and comparable EBITDA multiples. Significant increases in discount rates would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Significant decreases in comparable EBITDA multiples would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

Financial instruments disclosed but not carried at fair value
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s secured borrowings disclosed but not carried at fair value as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
Secured borrowings$562,893
 $562,893
 $421,885
 $421,885
Total$562,893
 $562,893
 $421,885
 $421,885
The carrying values of the secured borrowings and 2015-1 Notes approximate their respective fair values and are categorized as Level III3 within the hierarchy. Secured borrowings and 2015-1 Notes are valued generally using discounted cash flow analysis. The significant


unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s secured borrowings are discount rates. Significant increases in discount rates would result in a

significantly lower fair value measurement.

The following table represents the carrying values (before debt issuance costs) and fair values of the Company’s 2015-1 Notes disclosed but not carried at fair value as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
Aaa/AAA Class A-1A Notes$160,000
 $160,064
 $160,000
 $160,072
Aaa/AAA Class A-1B Notes40,000
 40,020
 40,000
 39,960
Aaa/AAA Class A-1C Notes27,000
 27,014
 27,000
 26,951
Aa2 Class A-2 Notes46,000
 46,027
 46,000
 45,784
Total$273,000
 $273,125
 $273,000
 $272,767
The fair value determination of the Company’s 2015-1 Notes was based on the market quotation(s) received from broker/dealer(s). These fair value measurements were based on significant inputs not observable and thus represent Level III3 measurements as defined in the accounting guidance for fair value measurement.

The carrying value of other financial assets and liabilities approximates their fair value based on the short term nature of these items.

See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information on fair value measurements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management’s estimates are based on historical experiences and other factors, including expectations of future events that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. It also requires management to exercise judgment in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. Assumptions and estimates regarding the valuation of investments and their resulting impact on base management and incentive fees involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and these assumptions and estimates may be significant to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Actual results could differ from these estimates and such differences could be material.

Investments

Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis of the investment using the specific identification method without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K reflects the net change in the fair value of investments, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.

Revenue Recognition

Interest from Investments and Realized Gain/Loss on Investments

Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis and includes the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums. Discounts from and premiums to par value on securities purchased are accreted/amortized into interest income over the life of the respective security using the effective interest method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost, including origination fees, adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums, if any. At time of exit, the realized gain or loss on an investment is the difference between the amortized cost at time of exit and the cash received at exit using the specific identification method.

The Company may have loans in its portfolio that contain payment-in-kind (“PIK”) provisions. PIK represents interest that is accrued and recorded as interest income at the contractual rates, increases the loan principal on the respective capitalization dates, and is generally due at maturity.

Interest income from investments in the “equity” class of collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) funds, which we refer to as “structured finance obligations”, is recorded based upon an estimation of an effective yield to expected maturity utilizing assumed cash flows in accordance with ASC 325-40,Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financials Assets. We monitor the expected cash inflows from our CLO equity investments, including the expected residual payments and the effective yield is determined and updated periodically. In estimating these cash flows, there are a number of assumptions that are subject to uncertainties, including the amount and timing of principal payments which are impacted by prepayments, repurchases, defaults, delinquencies and liquidations of or within the CLO funds. These uncertainties are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that could have impacted the Company’s estimates if the information was known at the time. As a result, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Other Income

Other income may include income such as consent, waiver and amendment fees associated with the Company’s investment activities as well as any fees for managerial assistance services rendered by the Company to portfolio companies. Such fees are recognized as income when earned or the services are rendered. The Company may receive fees for guaranteeing the outstanding debt of a portfolio company. Such fees will be amortized into other income over the life of the guarantee. The unamortized amount, if any, is included in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Non-Accrual Income

Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past due 30 days or more or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected in full. Accrued and unpaid interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest are paid current and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current. Management may not place a loan on non-accrual status if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection.

Income Taxes

For federal income tax purposes, GMS Finance has elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code, and intends to make the required distributions to its stockholders as specified therein. In order to qualify as a RIC, GMS Finance must meet certain minimum distribution, source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. If such requirements are met, then GMS Finance is generally required to pay income taxes only on the portion of its taxable income and gains it does not distribute.

The minimum distribution requirements applicable to RICs require GMS Finance to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (“ICTI”), as defined by the Code, each year. Depending on the level of ICTI earned in a tax year, GMS Finance may choose to carry forward ICTI in excess of current year distributions into the next tax year. Any such carryover ICTI must be distributed before the end of that next tax year through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such ICTI.

In addition, based on the excise distribution requirements, GMS Finance is subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on undistributed income unless GMS Finance distributes in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of its ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of capital gain net income (both long-term and short-term) for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in the preceding year. For this purpose, however, any ordinary income or capital gain net income retained by GMS Finance that is subject to corporate income tax is considered to have been distributed. GMS Finance intends to make sufficient distributions each taxable year to satisfy the excise distribution requirements.

The Company evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing its consolidated financial statements to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely than not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. All penalties and interest associated with income taxes, if any, are included in income tax expense.

The Borrower Sub is a disregarded entity for tax purposes and is consolidated with the tax return of GMS Finance.

Capital Calls and Dividends and Distributions to Common Stockholders

The Company records the shares issued in connection with capital calls as of the effective date of the capital call. To the extent that the Company has taxable income available, the Company intends to make quarterly distributions to its common stockholders. Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the record date. The amount to be distributed is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is generally based upon the taxable earnings estimated by management and available cash. Net realized capital gains, if any, are generally distributed at least annually, although the Company may decide to retain such capital gains for investment.

The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of any distributions on behalf of its stockholders, for those who have elected to participate in the plan. As a result of adopting such a plan, if the Board of Directors authorizes, and GMS Finance declares a cash dividend or distribution, the stockholders who have elected to participate in the dividend reinvestment plan would have their cash dividends or distributions automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock, rather than receiving cash. Prior to a Qualified IPO, the Company intends to use primarily newly issued shares of its common stock to implement the plan issued at the net asset value per share most recently determined by the Board of Directors. After a Qualified IPO, the Company intends to use primarily newly issued shares to implement the plan so long as the market value per share is equal to or greater than the net asset value per share as of the close of business on the relevant payment date for such dividend or distribution. If the market value per share is less than the net asset value per share as of the close of business on the relevant payment date, the plan administrator would purchase the common stock on behalf of participants in the open market, unless the Company instructs the plan administrator otherwise.

4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Investment Advisory Agreement

On April 3, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approveddirectors who are not “interested persons” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act (the “Independent Directors”), approved an investment advisory agreement (the “Original Investment Advisory AgreementAgreement”) between the Company and the Investment Adviser in accordance with, and on the basis of an evaluation satisfactory to such directors as required by, Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act. The Original Investment Advisory Agreement was amended on September 15, 2017 (as amended, the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) after the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, at an in-person meeting of the Board of Directors held on May 30, 2017 and the approval of the Company’s stockholders at a special meeting of stockholders held on September 15, 2017. The Investment Advisory Agreement was amended, among other things, to (i) reduce the incentive fee payable by the Company to the Investment Adviser from an annual rate of 20% to an annual rate of 17.5%, (ii) delete the incentive fee payment deferral test described below, and (iii) include in the pre-incentive fee net investment income, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature, accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. The initial term of the Investment Advisory Agreement is two years from April 3, 2013September 15, 2017 and, unless terminated earlier, the Investment Advisory Agreement will renew automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the vote of the Board of Directors and by the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors. On March 10, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for a one year period. The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of an assignment and may be terminated by either party without penalty upon at least 60 days’ written notice to the other party. Subject to the overall supervision of the Board of Directors, the Investment Adviser provides investment advisory services to the Company. For providing these services, the Investment Adviser receives fees from the Company consisting of two components—a base management fee and an incentive fee.

Prior to a Qualified IPO,

Effective September 15, 2017, the base management fees arefee is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears at an annual rate of 1.50% of the average dailyvalue of the gross assets at the end of the Companytwo most recently completed fiscal quarters, except for the periodfirst quarter following the IPO, in which case the base management fee is calculated based on the Company’s gross assets as of the end of such fiscal quarter. In each case, the base management fee will be appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases excludingduring such fiscal quarter and the base management fees for any partial month or quarter will be pro-rated. The Company’s gross assets exclude any cash and cash equivalents and includinginclude assets acquired with leveragethrough the incurrence of debt from use of

the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility, Credit Facility and 2015-1 Notes (see Note 5,6, Borrowings, and Note 6,7, 2015-1 Notes, in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K)Notes). For purposes of this calculation, cash and cash equivalents include any temporary investments in cash-equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality investment grade debt investments that mature in 12 months or less from the date of investment. Base management fees for any partial quarter are prorated. As such,

Prior to September 15, 2017, under the Original Investment Advisory Agreement, the base management feesfee was calculated and payable quarterly in arrears at an annual rate of 1.50% of the average daily gross assets of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 were calculated commencing after May 8, 2013,


period adjusted for share issuances or repurchases. Prior to the dateIPO, the Company first called capital from investors. The Investment Adviser contractually waived its right to receive one-third (0.50%) of the 1.50% base management fee. Any waived base management fees priorare not subject to a Qualified IPO.recoupment by the Investment Adviser. The fee waiver will terminate if andterminated when a Qualifiedthe IPO hashad been consummated.

As previously disclosed, in connection with the IPO, the Investment Adviser agreed to continue the fee waiver until the completion of the first full quarter after the consummation of the IPO. As a result, beginning October 1, 2017, the base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.50% of the Company’s gross assets.

The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. The second part is determined and payable in arrears based on capital gains as of the end of each calendar year.

Pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the operating expenses accrued for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the administration agreement, and any interest expense or fees on any credit facilities or outstanding debt and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include,includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature, (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with pay-in-kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.

Prior to any Qualified IPO of the Company’s common stock,

Effective September 15, 2017, pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the average daily Hurdle Calculation Value (as defined below) throughoutvalue of our net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, iswill be compared to a “hurdle rate” of 1.50% per quarter (6% annualized). “Hurdle Calculation Value” means, on any given day, the sum or a “catch-up rate” of (x) the value of net assets1.82% per quarter (7.28% annualized), as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately preceding such day plus (y) the aggregate amount of capital drawn from investors (or reinvested in us pursuant to a dividend reinvestment plan) from the beginning of the current quarter to such day minus (z) the aggregate amount of distributions (including share repurchases) made by the Company from the beginning of the current quarter to such day but onlyapplicable.
Pursuant to the extent such distributions were not declared and accounted for onInvestment Advisory Agreement, the books and records in a previous quarter.

The Company pays its Investment Adviser an incentive fee with respect to its pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:

no incentive fee based on pre-incentive fee net investment income in any calendar quarter in which its pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the hurdle rate of 1.50%;

100% of pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 1.875%1.82% in any calendar quarter (7.50%(7.28% annualized). The Company refers to this portion of the pre-incentive fee net investment income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 1.875%1.82%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” is meant to provide the Investment Adviser with approximately 20%17.5% of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a hurdle rate did not apply if this net investment income exceeds 1.875%1.82% in any calendar quarter; and

20%17.5% of the amount of pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 1.875%1.82% in any calendar quarter (7.50%(7.28% annualized) will be payable to the Investment Adviser. This reflects that once the hurdle rate is reached and the catch-up is achieved, 20%17.5% of all pre-incentive fee investment income thereafter is allocated to the Investment Adviser.

The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20%17.5% of realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the date of determination, computed net of all realized capital losses on a cumulative basis and unrealized capital depreciation, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees, provided that, the incentive fee determined at the end of the first calendar year of operations may be calculated for a period of shorter than twelve calendar months to take into account any realized capital gains computed net of all realized capital losses on a cumulative basis and unrealized capital depreciation.

The

Prior to September 15, 2017, under the Original Investment Advisory Agreement, pre-incentive fee net investment income, which did not include, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature, accrued income that the Company will deferhas not yet received in cash, and was expressed as a rate of return on the average daily Hurdle Calculation Value (as defined below) throughout the immediately preceding calendar quarter, was compared to a “hurdle rate” of 1.50% per quarter (6% annualized) or a “catch-up” of 1.875% per quarter (7.50% annualized), as applicable. “Hurdle Calculation Value” meant, on any given day, the sum of (x) the value of net assets as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately preceding such day plus (y) the aggregate amount of capital drawn from investors (or reinvested in the Company pursuant to a dividend reinvestment plan) from the beginning of the current quarter to such day minus (z) the aggregate amount of distributions (including share


repurchases) made by the Company from the beginning of the current quarter to such day, but only to the extent such distributions were not declared and accounted for on the books and records in a previous quarter. In addition, under the Original Investment Advisory Agreement, the Company deferred payment of any incentive fee otherwise earned by the Investment Adviser if, during the most recent four full calendar quarter periods (or, if less, the number of full calendar quarters completed since the initial drawdown of capital from the stockholders, “Initial Drawdown”) ending on or prior to the date such payment is to be made, the sum of (a) the aggregate distributions to stockholders and (b) the change in net assets (defined as gross assets less indebtedness and before taking into account any incentive fees payable during the period) is less than 6.0% of net assets (defined as gross assets less indebtedness) at the beginning of such period, provided, that such percentage will be appropriately prorated during the four full calendar quarters immediately following the Initial Drawdown.period. These calculations arewere adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases. Any deferred incentive fees arewere carried over for payment in subsequent calculation periods. The
As previously disclosed, in connection with the IPO, the Investment Adviser may earn anagreed to charge 17.5% instead of 20% with respect to, or effectively waive 2.5% from, the entire calculation of the incentive fee underbeginning on the first full quarter following the consummation of the IPO until the earlier of (i) October 1, 2017 and (ii) the date that the Company’s stockholders vote on the approval of the amendment to the Original Investment Advisory Agreement. The Company’s stockholders voted to approve the Investment Advisory Agreement on September 15, 2017.
For the Company’s repurchaseyears ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, base management fees were $19,327, $12,359 and $8,907, respectively (net of debt issued by the Company at a gain.

Prior to a Qualified IPO, from time to time, CGMSIM intends to pay certain individuals providing services to CGMSIM, including memberswaiver of the CGMSIM Investment Team, in shares of our common stock and/or in cash a portion of the net after-tax$5,927, $6,180 and $4,454, respectively), incentive fees that CGMSIM receives from us (notrelated to exceed 25%)pre-incentive fee net investment income were $21,084, $14,905 and $8,881, respectively, and there were no incentive fees related to realized capital gains. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, there were no accrued capital gains incentive fees based upon the cumulative net realized and unrealized appreciation (depreciation). The accrual for any capital gains incentive fee under US GAAP in consideration of their services on behalf of CGMSIM. To the extent that anya given period may result in an additional expense if such paymentcumulative amount is in shares of our common stock, CGMSIM will purchase such shares from us and distribute the shares to the individuals eligible for such payment, and, to the extent that any such payment is in cash, CGMSIM will require the individuals eligible for such payment to make capital commitments to purchase newly issued shares of our common stock. In addition, following the completion of a Qualified IPO, from time to time, CGMSIM intends to purchase shares of our common stockgreater than in the open market atprior period or a purchase price,reduction of previously recorded expense if such cumulative amount is less than in the aggregate, equal to approximately 25%prior period. If such cumulative amount is negative, then there is no accrual.


As of each installment of the net after-taxDecember 31, 2017 and 2016, $13,098 and $8,157, respectively, was included in base management and incentive fees that CGMSIM receives from us, subject to market conditions. CGMSIM may then distribute those shares to members of the CGMSIM Investment Team and other individuals eligible for such payment in consideration of their services on behalf of CGMSIM.

Our Investment Adviser has not assumed any responsibility to us other than to render the services describedpayable in the Investment Advisory Agreement,accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and it is not responsible for any action of our Board in declining to follow our Investment Adviser’s advice or recommendations. Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, our Investment Adviser and its managers, officers, employees, agents, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with it are not liable to us for any action taken or omitted to be taken by the Adviser in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Company (except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services). We have agreed to the fullest extent permitted by law, to provide indemnification and the right to the advancement of expenses, to each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved (including, without limitation, as a witness) in any actual or threatened action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he/she is or was a member, manager, officer, employee, agent, controlling person or any other person or entity affiliated with the Adviser with respect to all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses resulting from acts of our Investment Adviser in the performance of their duties under the Investment Advisory Agreement, other than acts not in good faith with the reasonable belief that the conduct was in, or not opposed to, the best interest of the Company, and conduct constituting gross negligence, bad faith, reckless disregard, or willful misfeasance. These protections may lead our Investment Adviser to act in a riskier manner when acting on our behalf than it would when acting for its own account.

Liabilities.

On April 3, 2013, the Investment Adviser entered into a personnel agreement with The Carlyle Group Employee Co., L.L.C. (“Carlyle Employee Co.”), an affiliate of the Investment Adviser, pursuant to which Carlyle Employee Co. provides the Investment Adviser with access to investment professionals.

Administration Agreement

On April 3, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Administration Agreementan administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) between the Company and the Administrator. Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, the Administrator provides services and receives reimbursements equal to an amount that reimburses the Administrator for its costs and expenses and the Company’s allocable portion of overhead incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including the Company’s allocable portion of the compensation paid to or compensatory distributions received by the Company’s officers (including the Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer) and respective staff who provide services to the Company, operations staff who provide services to the Company, and any internal audit staff, to the extent internal audit performs a role in the Company’s Sarbanes-Oxley Act internal control assessment. Reimbursement under the Administration Agreement occurs quarterly in arrears.

The initial term of the Administration Agreement is two years from April 3, 2013 and, unless terminated earlier, the Administration Agreement will renew automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board of Directors or by a majority vote of the outstanding voting securities of the Company and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors. On March 10, 2016,20, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved the continuance of the Administration Agreement for a one year period. The Administration Agreement may not be assigned by a party without the consent of the other party and may be terminated by either party without penalty upon at least 60 days’ written notice to the other party.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred $661, $703 and $595, respectively, in fees under the Administrative Agreement, which were included in administrative service fees in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $95 and $137, respectively, was unpaid and included in administrative service fees payable in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.


Sub-Administration Agreements

On April 3, 2013, the Administrator entered into sub-administration agreements with Carlyle Employee Co. and CELF Advisors LLP.LLP (“CELF”) (the “Carlyle Sub-Administration Agreements”). Pursuant to the agreements,Carlyle Sub-Administration Agreements, Carlyle Employee Co. and CELF Advisors LLP provide the Administrator with access to personnel.

On April 3, 2013, the Administrator entered into a sub-administration agreement with State Street Bank and Trust Company (as amended,(“State Street” and, such agreement, the “State Street Sub-Administration Agreement” and, together with the Carlyle Sub-Administration Agreements, the “Sub-Administration Agreement”Agreements”). On March 11, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved an amendment to the State Street Sub-Administration Agreement. The initial term of the State Street Sub-Administration Agreement ends on April 1, 2017 and, unless terminated earlier, the State Street Sub-Administration Agreement will renew automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board of Directors or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors. The State Street Sub-Administration Agreement may be terminated upon at least 60 days’ written notice and without penalty by the vote of a majority of the outstanding securities of the Company, or by the vote of the Board of Directors or by either party to the State Street Sub-Administration Agreement.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, fees incurred in connection with the State Street Sub-Administration Agreement, which amounted to $725, $602 and $486, respectively, were included in other general and administrative in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $196 and $159, respectively, was unpaid and included in other accrued expenses and liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.
Placement Fees

On April 3, 2013, the Company entered into a placement fee arrangement with TCG Securities, L.L.C. (“TCG”), a licensed broker-dealer and an affiliate of the Investment Adviser, which may require stockholders to pay a placement fee to TCG for TCG’s services.

At the time of the IPO, the placement fee arrangement with TCG was automatically terminated.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, TCG earned placement fees of $19, $12 and $6, respectively, from the Company’s stockholders in connection with the issuance or sale of the Company’s common stock prior to the IPO.
Board of Directors

GMS Finance’s

The Company’s Board of Directors currently consists of sevenfive members, fourthree of whom are Independent Directors. On April 3, 2013, the Board of Directors also established an Audit Committee consisting of its Independent Directors. The Board of Directors also established a Pricing Committee of the Board of Directors, a Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors and a Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and may establish additional committees in the future.

Item 7A. Quantitative For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes2015, the Company incurred $443, $553 and $419, respectively, in fees and expenses associated with its Independent Directors and Audit Committee. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $25 and $0, respectively, was unpaid and included in other accrued expenses and liabilities in the valuationsaccompanying Consolidated Statements of our investment portfolioAssets and interest rates.

Valuation Risk

Our investments may not have a readily available market price, and we value these investments at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors in accordanceLiabilities.

Transactions with our valuation policy. There is no single standard for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments we make. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments may fluctuate from period to period. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, these estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed, and it is possible that the difference could be material.

Interest Rate Risk

Credit Fund

During the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company sold 17 and 2 investments, respectively, to Credit Fund for proceeds of $135,466 and $39,838, respectively, and realized gains of $190 and $0, respectively. See Note 5, Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC, for further information about Credit Fund.
5. MIDDLE MARKET CREDIT FUND, LLC
Overview
On February 29, 2016, the Company and Credit Partners entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement to co-manage Credit Fund, an unconsolidated Delaware limited liability company. Credit Fund primarily invests in first lien loans of middle market companies. Credit Fund is managed by a majoritysix-member board of managers, on which the Company and Credit Partners each have equal representation. Establishing a quorum for Credit Fund’s board of managers requires at least four members to be present at a meeting, including at least two of the Company’s representatives and two of Credit Partners’


representatives. The Company and Credit Partners each have 50% economic ownership of Credit Fund and have commitments to fund, from time to time, capital of up to $400,000 each. Funding of such commitments generally requires the approval of the board of Credit Fund, including the board members appointed by the Company. By virtue of its membership interest, the Company and Credit Partners each indirectly bear an allocable share of all expenses and other obligations of Credit Fund.
Together with Credit Partners, the Company co-invests through Credit Fund. Investment opportunities for Credit Fund are sourced primarily by the Company and its affiliates. Portfolio and investment decisions with respect to Credit Fund must be unanimously approved by a quorum of Credit Fund’s investment committee consisting of an equal number of representatives of the Company and Credit Partners. Therefore, although the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities of Credit Fund, the Company does not believe that it has control over Credit Fund (other than for purposes of the Investment Company Act). Middle Market Credit Fund SPV, LLC (the “Credit Fund Sub”) and MMCF CLO 2017-1 LLC (the “2017-1 Issuer”), each a Delaware limited liability company, were formed on April 5, 2016 and October 6, 2017, respectively. Credit Fund Sub and the 2017-1 Issuer are wholly owned subsidiaries of Credit Fund and are consolidated in Credit Fund’s consolidated financial statements commencing from the date of their respective formations. Credit Fund Sub and the 2017-1 Issuer primarily invest in first lien loans of middle market companies. Credit Fund and its wholly owned subsidiaries follow the same Internal Risk Rating System as the Company.
Credit Fund, the Company and Credit Partners entered into an administration agreement with CGCA, the administrative agent of Credit Fund (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”), pursuant to which the Administrative Agent is delegated certain administrative and non-discretionary functions, is authorized to enter into sub-administration agreements at our expense with the approval of the board of managers of Credit Fund, and is reimbursed by Credit Fund for its costs and expenses and Credit Fund’s allocable portion of overhead incurred by the Administrative Agent in performing its obligations thereunder.
Selected Financial Data
Since inception of Credit Fund and through December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company and Credit Partners each made capital contributions of $1 in members’ equity and $86,500 and $35,000, respectively, in subordinated loans to Credit Fund. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Credit Fund had net borrowings of $85,750 and $62,384, respectively, in mezzanine loans under a revolving credit facility with the Company (the “Credit Fund Facility”). As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Credit Fund had subordinated loans and members’ capital of $173,532 and $74,547, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s ownership interest in such subordinated loans and members’ capital was $86,766 and $37,273, respectively, and in such mezzanine loans was $85,750 and $62,384, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Credit Fund held cash and cash equivalents totaling $19,502 and $6,103, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Credit Fund had total investments heldat fair value of $984,773 and $437,829, respectively, which was comprised of first lien senior secured loans and second lien senior secured loans to 51 and 28 portfolio companies, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, no loans in Credit Fund’s portfolio were on non-accrual status or contained PIK provisions. All investments in the Company’s portfolio hadwere floating rate debt investments with an interest rates. Interest rates onrate floor. The portfolio companies in Credit Fund are U.S. middle market companies in industries similar to those in which the investments held within the Company’s portfolio of investments are typically based on floating LIBOR, with many of these investments also having a LIBOR floor.Company may invest directly. Additionally, the Company’s credit facilities and 2015-1 Notes are also subject to floating interest rates and are currently paid based on floating LIBOR rates.

Interest rate sensitivity refers to the change in earnings that may result from changes in the level of interest rates. There can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our income in the future.

The following table estimates the potential changes in net cash flow generated from interest income, should interest rates increase or decrease by 100, 200 or 300 basis points. Interest income is calculated as revenue from interest generated from the Company’s settled portfolio of investments held as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014, excluding structured finance obligations. These hypothetical calculations are based on2016, Credit Fund had commitments to fund various undrawn revolvers and delayed draw investments to its portfolio companies totaling $72,458 and $30,361, respectively.

Below is a modelsummary of Credit Fund’s portfolio, followed by a listing of the settled investmentsloans in ourCredit Fund’s portfolio excluding structured finance obligations, held as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014, and are only adjusted for assumed changes in the underlying base interest rates and the impact of that change on interest income. Interest expense is calculated based on outstanding secured borrowings and 2015-1 Notes as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and based on the terms of the Company’s credit facilities and 2015-1 Notes. Interest expense on the Company’s credit facilities and 2015-1 Notes is calculated using the interest rate as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, adjusted for the hypothetical changes in rates, as shown below. We intend to continue to finance a portion of our investments with borrowings and the interest rates paid on our borrowings may impact significantly our net interest income.

The Company regularly measures exposure to interest rate risk. The Company assesses interest rate risk and manages interest rate exposure on an ongoing basis by comparing our interest rate sensitive assets to our interest rate sensitive liabilities. Based on that review, we determine whether or not any hedging transactions are necessary to mitigate exposure to changes in interest rates.

Based on our Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the following table shows the annual impact on net investment income of base rate changes in interest rates for our settled investments (considering interest rate floors for variable rate instruments), excluding structured finance obligations, and outstanding secured borrowings (including the 2015-1 Notes) assuming no changes in our investment and borrowing structure:

   As of December 31, 2015   As of December 31, 2014 

Basis Point Change

  Interest
Income
   Interest
Expense
  Net
Investment
Income
   Interest
Income
  Interest
Expense
  Net
Investment
Income
 

Up 300 basis points

  $26,335    $(14,409 $11,926    $12,899   $(9,253 $3,646  

Up 200 basis points

  $16,271    $(9,606 $6,665    $7,212   $(6,169 $1,043  

Up 100 basis points

  $6,207    $(4,803 $1,404    $1,525   $(3,084 $(1,559

Down 100 basis points

  $—      $2,826   $2,826    $(210 $736   $526  

Down 200 basis points

  $—      $2,826   $2,826    $(420 $736   $316  

Down 300 basis points

  $—      $2,826   $2,826    $(630 $736   $106  

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2016:
 As of December 31,
2017
As of December 31,
2016
Senior secured loans (1)
$993,380
$439,086
Weighted average yields of senior secured loans based on amortized cost (2)
6.80%6.47%
Weighted average yields of senior secured loans based on fair value (2)
6.79%6.41%
Number of portfolio companies in Credit Fund51
28
Average amount per portfolio company (1)
$19,478
$15,682

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

77

Consolidated Statements(1)

At par/principal amount.
(2)Weighted average yields include the effect of Assetsaccretion of discounts and Liabilitiesamortization of premiums and are based on interest rates as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014

782016. Weighted average yield on debt and income producing securities at


fair value is computed as (a) the annual stated interest rate or yield earned plus the net annual amortization of OID and market discount earned on accruing debt included in such securities, divided by (b) total first lien and second lien debt at fair value included in such securities. Weighted average yield on debt and income producing securities at amortized cost is computed as (a) the annual stated interest rate or yield earned plus the net annual amortization of OID and market discount earned on accruing debt included in such securities, divided by (b) total first lien and second lien debt at amortized cost included in such securities. Actual yields earned over the life of each investment could differ materially from the yields presented above.


Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2017
Investments (1)
Industry Interest Rate  Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount 
Amortized Cost (5)
 
Fair Value (6)
First Lien Debt (99.39% of fair value)           
Acrisure, LLC (2)(3)(4)(11)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 11/22/2023 $21,097
 $21,055
 $21,291
Advanced Instruments, LLC (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 10/31/2022 11,910
 11,793
 11,910
Alpha Packaging Holdings, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/12/2020 16,860
 16,812
 16,860
AM Conservation Holding Corporation (2)(3)(4)(13)
Energy: Electricity L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/31/2022 38,700
 38,433
 38,553
AMS Finco, S.A.R.L. (Alexander Mann Solutions) (United Kingdom) (2)(3)(4)(11)(13)
Business Services L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 5/26/2024 24,875
 24,646
 24,875
Anaren, Inc. (2)(3)(4)
Telecommunications L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 2/18/2021 9,993
 9,971
 9,993
AQA Acquisition Holding, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
High Tech Industries L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 5/24/2023 27,403
 27,288
 27,403
Big Ass Fans, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Capital Equipment L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 5/21/2024 8,000
 7,964
 8,010
Borchers, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 11/1/2024 15,748
 15,694
 15,665
Brooks Equipment Company, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Construction & Building L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/29/2020 7,061
 7,045
 7,061
DBI Holding LLC (2)(3)(4)(11)(13)
Transportation: Cargo L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 8/1/2021 19,800
 19,659
 19,833
DecoPac, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
Non-durable Consumer Goods L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 9/29/2024 13,414
 13,270
 13,415
Dent Wizard International Corporation (2)(3)(4)(11)
Automotive L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 4/7/2020 24,502
 24,382
 24,475
DTI Holdco, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(11)(13)
High Tech Industries L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 9/30/2023 19,750
 19,575
 19,663
EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (2)(3)(4)(8)(11)(13)
Telecommunications L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/7/2022 22,663
 22,127
 22,153
EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (2)(3)(9)(11)(13)
Telecommunications L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/7/2022 1,500
 1,462
 1,470
Empower Payments Acquisitions, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 11/30/2023 17,325
 17,018
 17,325
FCX Holdings Corp. (2)(3)(4)(11)
Capital Equipment L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 8/4/2020 18,491
 18,438
 18,512
Golden West Packaging Group LLC (2)(3)(4)(11)(13)
Containers, Packaging & Glass L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/20/2023 20,895
 20,709
 20,895
HMT Holding Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
Energy: Oil & Gas L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 11/17/2023 35,062
 34,387
 34,709
J.S. Held LLC (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 9/27/2023 18,204
 18,018
 18,144
Jensen Hughes, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Utilities: Electric L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/4/2021 20,963
 20,784
 20,963
Kestra Financial, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/24/2022 17,206
 17,009
 17,203
Mold-Rite Plastics, LLC (2)(3)(4)(11)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 12/14/2021 15,000
 14,946
 14,993
MSHC, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Construction & Building L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 7/31/2023 10,000
 9,957
 10,032
North American Dental Management, LLC (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 7/7/2023 23,978
 23,157
 23,577
North Haven CA Holdings, Inc. (CoAdvantage) (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
Business Services L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/2/2023 31,565
 31,237
 31,436
Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corporation (2)(3)(4)(11)(13)
Transportation: Cargo L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 10/12/2024 20,000
 19,906
 19,998
PAI Holdco, Inc. (Parts Authority) (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Automotive L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 12/30/2022 16,564
 16,459
 16,515
Paradigm Acquisition Corp. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Business Services L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 10/12/2024 23,500
 23,445
 23,554
Pasternack Enterprises, Inc. (Infinite RF) (2)(3)(4)(11)
Capital Equipment L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/27/2022 20,228
 20,134
 20,174
Premier Senior Marketing, LLC (2)(3)(4)(11)(13)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 7/1/2022 11,675
 11,606
 11,628
PSI Services LLC (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Business Services L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 1/20/2023 30,676
 30,171
 30,082
Q Holding Company (2)(3)(4)(13)
Automotive L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/18/2021 17,277
 17,227
 17,277
QW Holding Corporation (Quala) (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Environmental Industries L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 8/31/2022 11,453
 10,879
 10,933
Radiology Partners, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(12)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.75% (1.00% Floor) 12/4/2023 25,793
 25,494
 25,642
Restaurant Technologies, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(11)(13)
Retail L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 11/23/2022 17,369
 17,241
 17,219
Sovos Brands Intermediate, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
Beverage, Food & Tobacco L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 7/18/2024 21,568
 21,419
 21,633
Superion (fka Ramundsen Public Sector, LLC) (2)(3)(4)(13)
Sovereign & Public Finance L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 2/1/2024 3,970
 3,955
 4,000
Surgical Information Systems, LLC (2)(3)(4)(9)(11)(13)
High Tech Industries L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 4/24/2023 30,000
 29,728
 30,075


Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2017
Investments (1)Industry Interest Rate  Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount Amortized Cost (5) Fair Value (6)
First Lien Debt (99.39% of fair value)           
Systems Maintenance Services Holding, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(11)(13)
High Tech Industries L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/28/2023 $24,255
 $24,126
 $20,617
T2 Systems Canada, Inc. (2)(3)(4)
Transportation: Consumer L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/28/2022 2,673
 2,617
 2,634
T2 Systems, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
Transportation: Consumer L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/28/2022 15,929
 15,577
 15,679
Teaching Strategies, LLC (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 2/27/2023 17,964
 17,803
 17,952
The Original Cakerie, Ltd. (Canada) (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)
Beverage, Food & Tobacco L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 7/20/2021 6,939
 6,879
 6,922
The Original Cakerie, Co. (Canada) (2)(3)(11)(13)
Beverage, Food & Tobacco L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 7/20/2021 3,585
 3,572
 3,579
ThoughtWorks, Inc. (2)(3)(11)(13)
Business Services L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/12/2024 8,000
 7,980
 8,032
U.S. Acute Care Solutions, LLC (2)(3)(4)(13)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/15/2021 32,030
 31,808
 31,537
U.S. TelePacific Holdings Corp. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Telecommunications L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/2/2023 29,850
 29,566
 28,581
Valicor Environmental Services, LLC (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Environmental Industries L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 6/1/2023 27,047
 26,576
 26,984
WIRB - Copernicus Group, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)
Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/12/2022 14,838
 14,780
 14,838
WRE Holding Corp. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(11)(13)
Environmental Industries L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 1/3/2023 5,367
 5,283
 5,279
Zest Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(4)(11)
Durable Consumer Goods L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 8/16/2023 19,152
 19,107
 19,272
Zywave, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(7)(10)(13)
High Tech Industries L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 11/17/2022 17,663
 17,508
 17,663
First Lien Debt Total        $977,682
 $978,718
Second Lien Debt (0.61% of fair value)           
Paradigm Acquisition Corp. (2)(3)(12)(13)
Business Services L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 10/12/2025 $4,800
 $4,753
 $4,792
Superion, LLC (fka Ramundsen Public Sector, LLC) (2)(3)(13)
Sovereign & Public Finance L + 8.50% (1.00% Floor) 2/1/2025 200
 198
 202
Zywave, Inc. (2)(3)(13)
High Tech Industries L + 9.00% (1.00% Floor) 11/17/2023 1,050
 1,036
 1,061
Second Lien Debt Total        $5,987
 $6,055
Total Investments        $983,669
 $984,773

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

79

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

80

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

81

Consolidated Schedules of Investments as of December 31, 2015 and 2014

82

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

95

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities of Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. (the “Company”), including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in net assets for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2015 by correspondence with the custodian and debt agents. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results of its operations, its cash flows, and the changes in its net assets for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, NY

March 11, 2016

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

   December 31,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 

ASSETS

   

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated, at fair value (amortized cost of $1,079,720 and $707,701, respectively)

  $1,052,666   $698,662  

Cash and cash equivalents

   41,837    8,754  

Receivable for investment sold

   1,987    —    

Deferred financing costs

   6,233    4,635  

Interest receivable

   3,279    4,512  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   386    157  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $1,106,388   $716,720  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

   

Payable for investments purchased

  $—     $55,343  

Secured borrowings (Note 5)

   234,313    308,441  

2015-1 Notes payable (Note 6)

   273,000    —    

Due to Investment Adviser

   189    41  

Interest and credit facility fees payable (Notes 5 and 6)

   2,577    1,192  

Dividend payable (Note 8)

   18,284    6,276  

Base management and incentive fees payable (Note 4)

   5,277    6,319  

Administrative service fees payable (Note 4)

   97    91  

Other accrued expenses and liabilities

   925    760  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   534,662    378,463  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7 and 10)

   

NET ASSETS

   

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 31,524,083 shares and 17,932,697 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding

   315    179  

Paid-in capital in excess of par value

   613,944    351,636  

Offering costs

   (74  (74

Accumulated net investment income (loss), net of cumulative dividends of $65,851 and $18,162, respectively

   (12,994  (4,388

Accumulated net realized gain (loss)

   (2,411  (57

Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

   (27,054  (9,039
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total net assets

  $571,726   $338,257  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET ASSETS PER SHARE

  $18.14   $18.86  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015  2014  2013 

Investment income:

    

Interest income from non-controlled/non-affiliated investments

  $69,190   $32,984   $4,969  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total investment income

   69,190    32,984    4,969  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Expenses:

    

Base management fees (Note 4)

   13,361    6,559    937  

Incentive fees (Note 4)

   8,881    3,578    —    

Organization expenses

   —      —      1,426  

Professional fees

   1,845    2,169    1,723  

Administrative service fees (Note 4)

   595    626    650  

Interest expense (Notes 5 and 6)

   9,582    3,648    353  

Credit facility fees (Note 5)

   1,898    3,052    1,164  

Trustee fees

   41    —      —    

Directors’ fees and expenses

   419    395    322  

Transfer agency fees

   177    135    84  

Other general and administrative

   1,321    748    291  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total expenses

   38,120    20,910    6,950  

Waiver of base management fees (Note 4)

   4,454    2,186    312  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net expenses

   33,666    18,724    6,638  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net investment income (loss)

   35,524    14,260    (1,669

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments:

    

Net realized gain (loss) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   1,164    72    63  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   (18,015  (8,718  (321
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

   (16,851  (8,646  (258
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

  $18,673   $5,614   $(1,927
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per common share (Note 8)

  $0.75   $0.43   $(0.64
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding—Basic and Diluted (Note 8)

   24,830,200    13,091,544    3,016,298  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Dividends declared per common share (Note 8)

  $1.74   $1.25    —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

(dollar amounts in thousands)

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015  2014  2013 

Increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations:

    

Net investment income (loss)

  $35,524   $14,260   $(1,669

Net realized gain (loss) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   1,164    72    63  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   (18,015  (8,718  (321
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

   18,673    5,614    (1,927
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Capital transactions:

    

Common stock issued

   262,354    164,769    188,001  

Reinvestment of dividends

   131    34    —    

Dividends declared (Note 11)

   (47,689  (18,162  —    

Less: offering costs

   —      —      (74
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from capital share transactions

   214,796    146,641    187,927  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets

   233,469    152,255    186,000  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net assets at beginning of year

   338,257    186,002    2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net assets at end of year

  $571,726   $338,257   $186,002  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollar amounts in thousands)

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015  2014  2013 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

  $18,673   $5,614   $(1,927

Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   1,051    1,820    513  

Net accretion of discount on securities

   (3,035  (1,108  (65

Net realized (gain) loss on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   (1,164  (72  (63

Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   18,015    8,718    321  

Cost of investments purchased and change in payable for investments purchased

   (653,154  (565,432  (210,292

Proceeds from sales and repayments of investments and change in receivable for investments sold

   228,004    121,229    3,445  

Changes in operating assets:

    

Interest receivable

   1,233    (2,828  (1,684

Prepaid expenses and other assets

   (229  (117  (40

Changes in operating liabilities:

    

Due to Investment Adviser

   148    25    16  

Interest and credit facility fees payable

   1,384    643    549  

Base management and incentive fees payable

   (1,042  5,694    625  

Administrative service fees payable

   6    (40  131  

Other accrued expenses and liabilities

   165    91    669  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

   (389,945  (425,763  (207,802
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   262,354    164,769    188,001  

Borrowings on Revolving Credit Facility and Facility

   402,200    420,023    66,822  

Proceeds from issuance of 2015-1 Notes

   273,000    —      —    

Repayments of Revolving Credit Facility and Facility

   (476,328  (178,404  —    

Debt issuance costs paid

   (2,648  (2,029  (4,939

Dividends paid in cash

   (35,550  (11,852  —    

Offering costs from issuance of common stock

   —      —      (74
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   423,028    392,507    249,810  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   33,083    (33,256  42,008  

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

   8,754    42,010    2  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

  $41,837   $8,754   $42,010  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures:

    

Offering expenses and financing costs due

  $1    —      —    

Interest paid during the year

  $8,083   $2,882   $94  

Dividends declared during the year

  $47,689   $18,162    —    

Reinvestment of dividends

  $131   $34    —    

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

C\ARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

As of December 31, 2015

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(1)

  Industry  Interest
Rate
  Maturity
Date
   Acquisition
Date
   Par/
Principal
Amount
   Amortized
Cost (6)
   Fair
Value (7)
   Percentage of
Net Assets
 

First Lien Debt (75.53%)

               

Access CIG, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Business Services   6.00  10/17/2021     10/16/2014    $18,522    $18,388    $18,291     3.20

AF Borrower LLC (Accuvant)(2)(3)(5)(13)

  High Tech Industries   6.25    1/28/2022     12/15/2014     16,277     16,055     15,829     2.77  

Alpha Packaging Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Containers, Packaging &
Glass
   5.25    5/12/2020     5/12/2014     11,409     11,398     11,180     1.96  

Anaren, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Telecommunications   5.50    2/18/2021     2/18/2014     10,981     10,898     10,759     1.88  

APX Group, Inc.(5) (8)

  Consumer Services   6.38    12/1/2019     10/15/2014     10,000     9,749     9,575     1.67  

Audax AAMP Holdings Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)

  Durable Consumer Goods   6.50    6/24/2017     5/22/2015     11,025     10,954     10,885     1.90  

BAART Programs, Inc. (2)(4)

  Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals   8.07    10/9/2021     12/1/2015     7,481     7,422     7,556     1.32  

Blue Bird Body Company(2)(3)(4)(8)(13)

  Transportation: Consumer   6.50    6/27/2020     7/22/2014     9,491     9,110     9,361     1.64  

Brooks Equipment Company, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Construction & Building   6.35    8/29/2020     8/29/2014     7,209     7,160     7,097     1.24  

Capstone Logistics Acquisition, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Transportation: Cargo   5.50    10/7/2021     10/3/2014     19,750     19,582     19,134     3.35  

Captive Resources Midco, LLC(2)(3)(4)(5)(9)(13)

  Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
   6.75    6/30/2020     6/30/2015     29,350     28,890     28,900     5.05  

Castle Management Borrower LLC (Highgate Hotels L.P.)(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Hotel, Gaming & Leisure   5.50    9/18/2020     10/10/2014     9,878     9,807     9,535     1.67  

Central Security Group, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)

  Consumer Services   6.25    10/6/2020     10/3/2014     24,750     24,444     23,884     4.18  

Colony Hardware Corporation(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Construction & Building   7.00    10/23/2021     10/23/2015     13,000     12,787     12,861     2.25  

CRCI Holdings Inc. (CLEAResult Consulting,
Inc.)(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Utilities: Electric   5.25    7/10/2019     7/29/2014     5,910     5,892     5,704     1.00  

Dent Wizard International Corporation(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Automotive   5.75    4/7/2020     4/28/2015     7,809     7,775     7,591     1.33  

Emerging Markets Communications, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Telecommunications   6.75    7/1/2021     7/9/2015     17,910     16,225     16,882     2.95  

EP Minerals, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Metals & Mining   5.50    8/20/2020     8/20/2014     10,369     10,329     10,168     1.78  

FCX Holdings Corp.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Capital Equipment   5.50    8/4/2020     8/4/2014     10,047     10,041     9,862     1.72  

Genex Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(13)

  Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
   5.25    5/30/2021     5/22/2014     4,243     4,227     4,164     0.73  

Green Energy Partners/Stonewall LLC(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Energy: Electricity   6.50    11/13/2021     11/12/2014     16,600     16,456     16,354     2.86  

Hummel Station LLC(2)(3)(5)

  Energy: Electricity   7.00    10/27/2022     10/26/2015     21,000     20,174     20,553     3.59  

Indra Holdings Corp. (Totes Isotoner)(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Non-durable Consumer Goods   5.25    5/1/2021     4/29/2014     14,285     14,173     13,818     2.42  

International Medical Group, Inc.(2)(3)(5)(12)

  Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
   5.75    10/30/2020     10/30/2015     30,000     29,415     30,276     5.30  

Jackson Hewitt Inc. (2)(3)(4)(13)

  Retail   8.00    7/30/2020     7/24/2015     14,800     14,526     14,600     2.55  

Language Line, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Telecommunications   6.50    7/7/2021     7/1/2015     23,896     23,675     23,697     4.14  

Miller Heiman, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Business Services   6.75    9/30/2019     10/1/2013     19,094     18,901     16,904     2.96  

Ministry Brands, LLC(2)(3)(5)(10)(18)

  High Tech Industries   8.00    11/20/2021     11/20/2015     936     926     901     0.16  

Ministry Brands, LLC(2)(3)(5)(12)(19)

  High Tech Industries   8.00    11/20/2021     11/20/2015     17,471     17,190     17,371     3.04  

MSX International, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Automotive   6.00    8/21/2020     8/18/2014     9,499     9,424     9,218     1.61  

National Technical Systems, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(14)

  Aerospace & Defense   7.00    6/12/2021     6/12/2015     25,935     25,609     24,919     4.36  

NES Global Talent Finance US LLC (United Kingdom)(2)(3)(4)(8)(13)

  Energy: Oil & Gas   6.50    10/3/2019     10/2/2013     11,875     11,715     11,327     1.98  

Paradigm Acquisition Corp.(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Business Services   6.00    6/2/2022     6/2/2015     23,482     23,154     22,984     4.02  

C\ARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2015

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(1)

  Industry  Interest
Rate
  Maturity
Date
   Acquisition
Date
   Par/
Principal
Amount
   Amortized
Cost (6)
   Fair
Value (7)
   Percentage of
Net Assets
 

First Lien Debt (75.53%) (continued)

               

Pelican Products, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Containers, Packaging &
Glass
   5.25  4/11/2020     4/8/2014    $7,817    $7,832    $7,444     1.30

Plano Molding Company, LLC(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Hotel, Gaming & Leisure   7.00    5/12/2021     5/1/2015     22,487     22,294     21,779     3.81  

Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC(2)(3)(4)(5)(12)

  Containers, Packaging &
Glass
   6.75    9/9/2020     9/9/2015     28,000     27,477     27,810     4.86  

Prowler Acquisition Corp. (Pipeline Supply and Service, LLC)(2)(3)(4)

  Wholesale   5.50    1/28/2020     1/24/2014     10,911     10,836     9,736     1.70  

PSC Industrial Holdings Corp(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Environmental Industries   5.75    12/5/2020     12/5/2014     11,880     11,782     11,622     2.03  

PSI Services LLC(2)(3)(4)(5)(12)

  Business Services   8.00    2/27/2021     2/27/2015     23,471     22,885     23,933     4.19  

SolAero Technologies Corp.(2)(3)(4)

  Telecommunications   5.75    12/10/2020     12/9/2014     10,827     10,744     10,511     1.84  

SolAero Technologies Corp.(2)(3)(13)

  Telecommunications   6.25    12/10/2020     5/1/2015     9,104     9,023     8,887     1.55  

Synarc-Biocore Holdings, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals   5.50    3/10/2021     3/6/2014     13,264     13,162     12,599     2.20  

Systems Maintenance Services Holding, Inc.(2)(3)(13)

  High Tech Industries   5.00    10/18/2019     10/18/2013     2,193     2,187     2,155     0.38  

TASC, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(8)(13)

  Aerospace & Defense   7.00    5/23/2020     12/17/2014     18,351     17,713     17,916     3.13  

Teaching Strategies, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Media: Advertising, Printing
& Publishing
   6.00    10/1/2019     2/5/2015     13,953     13,904     13,844     2.42  

The Hilb Group, LLC(2)(3)(5)(12)(13)(15)

  Banking, Finance, Insurance
& Real Estate
   6.75    6/24/2021     6/24/2015     23,458     22,850     23,555     4.12  

The Hygenic Corporation (Performance
Health)(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Non-durable Consumer
Goods
   6.00    10/11/2020     2/27/2015     15,920     15,721     15,368     2.69  

The SI Organization, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Aerospace & Defense   5.75    11/23/2019     5/16/2014     8,778     8,716     8,724     1.53  

The Topps Company, Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Non-durable Consumer
Goods
   7.25    10/2/2018     10/1/2013     11,395     11,326     11,395     1.99  

TruckPro, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Automotive   6.00    8/6/2018     8/6/2013     9,683     9,648     9,546     1.67  

U.S. Farathane, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Automotive   6.75    12/23/2021     2/6/2015     15,818     15,535     15,586     2.73  

Vetcor Professional Practices, LLC(2)(3)(4)(5)(13)(16)

  Consumer Services   7.00    4/20/2021     5/19/2015     11,085     10,983     11,034     1.93  

Violin Finco S.A.R.L. (Alexander Mann Solutions) (United Kingdom)(2)(3)(4)(8)(13)

  Business Services   5.75    12/20/2019     12/18/2013     11,252     11,176     11,241     1.97  

Vistage Worldwide Inc.(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Business Services   6.50    8/19/2021     8/13/2015     29,813     29,529     29,505     5.16  

Vitera Healthcare Solutions, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals   6.00    11/4/2020     11/1/2013     9,437     9,369     9,107     1.59  

Zest Holdings, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Durable Consumer Goods   5.00    8/16/2020     8/18/2014     9,694     9,694     9,597     1.69  
           

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

First Lien Debt Total

           $800,857    $795,034     139.06
           

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

C\ARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2015

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(1)

  Industry  Interest
Rate
  Maturity
Date
   Acquisition
Date
   Par/
Principal
Amount
   Amortized
Cost (6)
   Fair
Value (7)
   Percentage of
Net Assets
 

Second Lien Debt (19.98%)

               

AF Borrower LLC (Accuvant)(2)(3)(5)

  High Tech Industries   10.00  1/30/2023     12/15/2014    $8,000    $7,927    $7,666     1.34

Allied Security Holdings LLC(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Business Services   8.00    8/13/2021     9/25/2014     8,000     7,948     7,460     1.30  

AmeriLife Group, LLC(2)(3)(5)

  Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
   9.75    1/10/2023     7/9/2015     20,000     19,619     19,598     3.44  

Argon Medical Devices, Inc. (2)(3)(4)(5)

  Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals   12.00    6/23/2022     12/23/2015     24,000     23,294     23,354     4.09  

Berlin Packaging L.L.C.(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Containers, Packaging &
Glass
   7.75    10/1/2022     9/24/2014     9,200     9,139     8,694     1.52  

Charter NEX US Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber   9.25    2/5/2023     1/30/2015     10,000     9,864     9,459     1.65  

Confie Seguros Holding II Co. (2)(3)(5)

  Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
   10.25    5/8/2019     6/29/2015     12,000     11,896     11,820     2.07  

Creganna Finance (US) LLC (Ireland)(2)(3)(5)(8)

  Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals   9.00    6/1/2022     11/20/2014     9,900     9,814     9,740     1.70  

DiversiTech Corporation(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Capital Equipment   9.00    11/19/2022     5/19/2015     8,400     8,294     8,131     1.42  

Drew Marine Group Inc.(2)(3)(4)(5)

  Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber   8.00    5/19/2021     11/19/2013     12,500     12,478     11,743     2.05  

Genex Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(5)

  Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
   8.75    5/30/2022     5/22/2014     7,990     7,906     7,390     1.29  

Genoa, a QoL Healthcare Company, LLC(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Retail   8.75    4/28/2023     4/21/2015     9,900     9,807     9,523     1.67  

Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
   8.50    4/30/2022     4/30/2014     12,500     12,397     12,014     2.10  

Jazz Acquisition, Inc. (Wencor)(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Aerospace & Defense   7.75    6/19/2022     6/25/2014     6,700     6,674     5,759     1.01  

Landslide Holdings, Inc. (LANDesk
Software)(2)(3)(13)

  Software   8.25    2/25/2021     2/25/2014     3,500     3,480     3,113     0.54  

MRI Software, LLC(2)(3)(5)

  Software   9.00    6/23/2022     6/19/2015     11,250     11,093     10,890     1.91  

Phillips-Medisize Corporation(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber   8.25    6/16/2022     6/13/2014     5,000     4,958     4,700     0.82  

Power Stop, LLC(5)(17)

  Automotive   11.00    5/29/2022     5/29/2015     10,000     9,811     10,080     1.76  

Prime Security Services Borrower, LLC (Protection One, Inc.) (2)(3)(5)

  Consumer Services   9.75    7/1/2022     6/19/2015     6,700     6,607     6,271     1.10  

Prowler Acquisition Corp. (Pipeline Supply and Service, LLC)(2)(3)(5)

  Wholesale   9.50    7/28/2020     1/24/2014     3,000     2,953     2,493     0.44  

Systems Maintenance Services Holding, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

  High Tech Industries   9.25    10/18/2020     10/18/2013     6,000     5,959     5,860     1.02  

TASC, Inc. (5)(8)

  Aerospace & Defense   12.00    5/23/2021     12/17/2014     6,000     5,891     6,075     1.06  

Vitera Healthcare Solutions, LLC(2)(3)(4)(13)

  Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals   9.25    11/4/2021     11/1/2013     2,000     1,976     1,784     0.31  

Watchfire Enterprises, Inc.(2)(3)(5)(13)

  Media: Advertising, Printing
& Publishing
   9.00    10/2/2021     10/2/2013     7,000     6,923     6,779     1.19  
           

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Second Lien Debt Total

           $216,708    $210,396     36.80
           

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

C\ARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2015

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(1)

  Industry  Maturity
Date
   Acquisition
Date
   Par/
Principal
Amount
   Amortized
Cost (6)
   Fair
Value (7)
   Percentage of
Net Assets
 

Structured Finance Obligations (4.26%) (5) (8) (11)

          

1776 CLO I, Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   5/8/2020     2/27/2014    $11,750    $8,079    $3,347     0.59

AIMCO CLO, Series 2014-A, Class F, 5.47%(2)

  Structured Finance   7/20/2026     5/12/2014     2,700     2,369     1,701     0.30  

AIMCO CLO, Series 2014-A, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   7/20/2026     5/12/2014     11,500     8,369     5,779     1.00  

Ares XXVIII CLO Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   10/17/2024     10/10/2013     7,000     4,416     3,255     0.57  

Babson CLO Ltd. 2005-I, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   4/15/2019     7/16/2013     7,632     333     86     0.02  

CIFC Funding 2007-III, Ltd., Income Notes

  Structured Finance   7/26/2021     5/20/2014     6,500     2,902     2,453     0.43  

Clydesdale CLO 2005, Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   12/6/2017     7/15/2013     5,750         11     0.00  

Flagship VII Limited, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   1/20/2026     12/18/2013     7,000     4,781     3,184     0.56  

ING IM CLO 2012-1 LLC, Preferred Shares

  Structured Finance   3/14/2022     12/5/2014     7,610     4,637     3,789     0.66  

ING IM CLO 2012-1 LLC, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   3/14/2022     12/5/2014     2,500     1,523     1,245     0.22  

MSIM Peconic Bay, Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   7/20/2019     10/22/2013     4,500     1,112     923     0.16  

Nautique Funding Ltd., Income Notes

  Structured Finance   4/15/2020     2/24/2014     5,000     2,760     2,275     0.40  

Steele Creek CLO 2014-I, LLC, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   8/21/2026     7/18/2014     18,000     13,453     12,241     2.14  

Venture VI CDO Limited, Preference Shares

  Structured Finance   8/3/2020     4/17/2014     7,000     3,488     3,203     0.56  

Westwood CDO I, Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   3/25/2021     4/30/2015     4,000     1,718     1,320     0.23  
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Structured Finance Obligations Total

      $59,940    $44,812     7.84
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(1)

  Industry  

 

  Acquisition
Date
   Par/
Principal
Amount
   Cost   Fair
Value (7)
   Percentage of
Net Assets
 

Equity Investments (0.23%)(5)

              

Power Stop, LLC

  Automotive     5/29/2015    $7    $715    $788     0.14

The Hilb Group, LLC

  Banking, Finance,
Insurance & Real
Estate
     6/24/2015     1,500     1,500     1,636     0.28  
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity Investments Total

          $2,215    $2,424     0.42
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

          $1,079,720    $1,052,666     184.12

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, issuers of debt and equity investments held by Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. (“GMS Finance” or the “Company”)Credit Fund are domiciled in the United States and issuers of structured finance obligations are domiciled in the Cayman Islands. Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the “Investment Company Act”), the Company would be deemed to “control” a portfolio company if the Company owned more than 25% of its outstanding voting securities and/or held the power to exercise control over the management or policies of the portfolio company.States. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company does not “control” anygeographical composition of these portfolio companies. Underinvestments as a percentage of fair value was 1.07% in Canada, 2.52% in the Investment Company Act,United Kingdom, and 96.41% in the Company would be deemed an “affiliated person” of a portfolio company if the Company owns 5% or more of the portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities. As of December 31, 2015, the Company is not an “affiliated person” of any of these portfolio companies.United States.

C\ARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2015

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(2)Variable rate loans to the portfolio companies and variable rate notes of structured finance obligations bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to either LIBOR or an alternate base rate (commonly based on the Federal Funds Rate or the U.S. Prime Rate)Rate (“P”)), which generally resets quarterly. For each such loan, and note, the CompanyCredit Fund has provided the interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2015.2017. As of December 31, 2017, all of Credit Fund’s LIBOR loans were indexed to the 90-day LIBOR rate at 1.69%, except for those loans as indicated in Notes 11 and 12 below.
(3)Loan includes interest rate floor feature.
(4)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Carlyle GMS Finance SPV LLC (the “Borrower Sub”). The BorrowerCredit Fund Sub. Credit Fund Sub has entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Revolving Credit(the “Credit Fund Sub Facility”). The lenders of the Revolving Credit Fund Sub Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Borrower Sub (see Note 5, Borrowings).Credit Fund Sub. Accordingly, such assets are not available to creditors of Credit Fund or the Company or Carlyle GMS Finance MM CLO 2015-1 LLC (the “2015-1 Issuer”), a wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiary of the Company.
(5)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the Company. The Company has entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Facility”), which was subsequently amended on January 8, 2015. The lenders of the Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the portfolio investments held by the Company (see Note 5, Borrowings). Accordingly, such assets are not available to borrowers or creditors of the Borrower Sub or 2015-12017-1 Issuer.
(6)
(5)Amortized cost represents original cost, including origination fees and upfront fees received that are deemed to be an adjustment to yield, adjusted for the accretion/amortization of discounts/premiums, as applicable, on debt investments using the effective interest method. Equity tranche collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) fund investments, which are referred to as “structured finance obligations”, are recorded at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
(7)
(6)Fair value is determined in good faith by or under the direction of the Boardboard of Directorsmanagers of Credit Fund, pursuant to Credit Fund’s valuation policy, with the fair value of all investments determined using significant unobservable inputs, which is substantially similar to the valuation policy of the Company (see Notes 2 and 3), pursuant to the Company’s valuation policies.provided in Note 3, Fair Value Measurements.
(8)The Company has determined the indicated investments are non-qualifying assets under Section 55(a)
(7)Denotes that all or a portion of the Investment Company Act. Underassets are owned by Credit Fund. Credit Fund has entered into the Investment Company Act, the Company may not acquire any non-qualifying assets unless, at the time such acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70%Credit Fund Facility. The lenders of the Company’s total assets.Credit Fund Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the assets of Credit Fund. Accordingly, such assets are not available to creditors of Credit Fund Sub or the 2017-1 Issuer.
(9)Captive Resources Midco, LLC has an undrawn delayed draw term loan of $3,125 par value at LIBOR + 5.75%, 1.00% floor, and an undrawn revolver of $1,875 par value at LIBOR + 5.75%, 1.00% floor. An unused rate of 1.25% and 0.50% is charged on the delayed draw term loan and revolver principal, respectively, while undrawn.
(10)(8)The CompanyCredit Fund receives less than the stated interest rate of this loan as a result of an agreement among lenders. The interest rate reduction is 1.25% on EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP). Pursuant to the agreement among lenders in respect of this loan, this investment represents a “first out” first lienlien/first out loan, which has first priority ahead of the “last out” first lienlien/last out loan with respect to principal, interest and other payments.
(11)As of December 31, 2015, the Company has a greater than 25% but less than 50% equity or subordinated notes ownership interest in certain structured finance obligations. These investments have governing documents that preclude the Company from controlling management of the entity and therefore the Company has determined that the issuer of the investment is not a controlled affiliate or a non-controlled affiliate because the investments are not “voting securities”.
(12)(9)In addition to the interest earned based on the stated interest rate of this loan, which is the amount reflected in this schedule, the Company is entitled to receive additional interest as a result of an agreement among lenders.lenders as follows: EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (3.97%) and Surgical Information Systems, LLC (1.01%). Pursuant to the agreement among lenders in respect of this loan, this investment represents a “last out” first lienlien/last out loan, which has a secondary priority behind the “first out” first lienlien/first out loan with respect to principal, interest and other payments.


(10)As of December 31, 2017, Credit Fund had the following unfunded commitments to fund delayed draw and revolving senior secured loans:
First Lien Debt – unfunded delayed draw and revolving term loans commitments Type Unused Fee Par/ Principal Amount Fair Value
Advanced Instruments, LLC Revolver 0.50% $1,333
 $
AQA Acquisition Holding, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 2,459
 
Borchers, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 1,935
 (9)
DecoPac, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 1,457
 
HMT Holding Inc. Revolver 0.50% 4,938
 (43)
Jensen Hughes, Inc. Delayed Draw 1.00% 1,180
 
Jensen Hughes, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 2,000
 
J.S. Held LLC Delayed Draw 1.00% 2,253
 (7)
North American Dental Management, LLC Delayed Draw 1.00% 13,354
 (134)
North American Dental Management, LLC Revolver 0.50% 2,727
 (27)
North Haven CA Holdings, Inc. (CoAdvantage) Revolver 0.50% 3,362
 (12)
PAI Holdco, Inc. (Parts Authority) Delayed Draw 1.00% 3,286
 (8)
PSI Services LLC Revolver 0.50% 302
 (6)
QW Holding Corporation (Quala) Delayed Draw 1.00% 7,515
 (171)
QW Holding Corporation (Quala) Revolver 0.50% 3,849
 (88)
Radiology Partners, Inc. Delayed Draw 1.00% 2,483
 (12)
Radiology Partners, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 1,725
 (9)
Sovos Brands Intermediate, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 3,378
 9
T2 Systems, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 1,173
 (17)
Teaching Strategies, LLC Revolver 0.50% 1,900
 (1)
The Original Cakerie, Ltd. (Canada) Revolver 0.50% 1,665
 (3)
Valicor Environmental Services, LLC Revolver 0.50% 2,838
 (6)
WRE Holding Corp. Delayed Draw 1.04% 3,435
 (32)
WRE Holding Corp. Revolver 0.50% 748
 (7)
Zywave, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 1,163
 
Total unfunded commitments     $72,458
 $(583)
(11)As of December 31, 2017, this LIBOR loan was indexed to the 30-day LIBOR rate at 1.56%.
(12)As of December 31, 2017, this LIBOR loan was indexed to the 180-day LIBOR rate at 1.84%.
(13)Denotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the 2015-12017-1 Issuer and secure the notes issued in connection with a $400 million$399,900 term debt securitization completed by the CompanyCredit Fund on June 26, 2015 (see Note 6, 2015-1 Notes)December 19, 2017 (the “2017-1 Debt Securitization”). Accordingly, such assets are not available to the creditors of the Borrower SubCredit Fund or the Company.Credit Fund Sub.



Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2016
Investments (1)
Industry (2)
 Interest Rate Maturity Date Par/ Principal Amount 
Amortized Cost (5)
 
Fair Value (6)
First Lien Debt (99.31% of fair value)           
AM Conservation Holding Corporation (2) (3) (4)
Energy: Electricity L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 10/31/2022 $30,000
 $29,721
 $29,925
Datapipe, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (11)
Telecommunications L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 3/15/2019 9,750
 9,654
 9,764
Dimora Brands, Inc. (fka TK USA Enterprises, Inc.) (2) (3) (4) (11)
Construction & Building L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 4/4/2023 19,850
 19,580
 19,723
Diversitech Corporation (2) (4) (10) (11)
Capital Equipment P + 3.50% 11/19/2021 14,803
 14,617
 14,803
DTI Holdco, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (7)
High Tech Industries L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 9/30/2023 19,950
 19,751
 19,651
DYK Prime Acquisition LLC (2) (3) (4)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 4/1/2022 5,775
 5,735
 5,775
EAG, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (11)
Business Services L + 4.25% (1.00% Floor) 7/28/2018 8,713
 8,686
 8,720
EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (2) (3) (4) (8)
Telecommunications L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/7/2021 22,971
 22,323
 22,509
EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (2) (3) (4) (9)
Telecommunications L + 6.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/7/2021 1,500
 1,455
 1,468
Empower Payments Acquisitions, Inc. (2) (3) (7)
Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 11/30/2023 17,500
 17,154
 17,279
Generation Brands Holdings, Inc. (2) (3) (4)
Durable Consumer Goods L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 6/10/2022 19,900
 19,712
 20,099
Jensen Hughes, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (10)
Utilities: Electric L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/4/2021 20,409
 20,188
 20,327
Kestra Financial, Inc. (2) (3) (4)
Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 6/24/2022 19,900
 19,632
 19,814
MSHC, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (10)
Construction & Building L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 7/19/2021 13,177
 13,062
 13,003
PAI Holdco, Inc. (Parts Authority) (2) (3) (4)
Automotive L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 12/30/2022 9,950
 9,886
 9,950
Pasternack Enterprises, Inc. (Infinite RF) (2) (3) (4)
Capital Equipment L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/27/2022 11,941
 11,844
 11,941
Q Holding Company (2) (3) (4)
Automotive L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/18/2021 13,964
 13,828
 13,941
QW Holding Corporation (Quala) (2) (3) (4) (7) (10)
Environmental Industries L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 8/31/2022 8,975
 8,413
 9,030
RelaDyne Inc. (2) (3) (4) (10)
Wholesale L + 5.25% (1.00% Floor) 7/22/2022 23,514
 23,117
 23,443
Restaurant Technologies, Inc. (2) (3) (4)
Retail L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 11/23/2022 14,000
 13,871
 13,969
Systems Maintenance Services Holding, Inc. (2) (3) (4)
High Tech Industries L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 10/30/2023 12,000
 11,885
 12,001
T2 Systems Canada, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (11)
Transportation: Consumer L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/28/2022 2,700
 2,635
 2,727
T2 Systems, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (10) (11)
Transportation: Consumer L + 6.75% (1.00% Floor) 9/28/2022 15,300
 14,888
 15,473
The Original Cakerie, Ltd. (Canada) (2) (3) (4) (10)
Beverage, Food & Tobacco L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 7/20/2021 7,009
 6,946
 7,009
The Original Cakerie, Co. (Canada) (2) (3) (4)
Beverage, Food & Tobacco L + 5.50% (1.00% Floor) 7/20/2021 3,621
 3,591
 3,621
U.S. Acute Care Solutions, LLC (2) (3) (4)
Health & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 5/15/2021 26,400
 26,154
 26,336
U.S. Anesthesia Partners, Inc. (2) (3) (4)
Health & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 12/31/2019 10,374
 10,275
 10,362
Vantage Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (11)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 4.50% (1.00% Floor) 2/5/2021 17,910
 17,786
 17,903
WIRB – Copernicus Group, Inc. (2) (3) (4)
Health & Pharmaceuticals L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 8/12/2022 $7,980
 $7,916
 $8,050
Zest Holdings, LLC (2) (3) (4)
Durable Consumer Goods L + 4.75% (1.00% Floor) 8/16/2020 8,700
 8,658
 8,749
Zywave, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (7) (10)
High Tech Industries L + 5.00% (1.00% Floor) 11/17/2022 17,500
 17,315
 17,434
First Lien Debt Total        $430,278
 $434,799
Second Lien Debt (0.69% of fair value)           
Vantage Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (2) (3) (4) (11)
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber L + 8.75% (1.00% Floor) 2/5/2022 $2,000
 $1,960
 $1,987
Zywave, Inc. (2) (3) (4)
High Tech Industries L + 9.00% (1.00% Floor) 11/17/2023 1,050
 1,034
 1,043
Second Lien Debt Total        $2,994
 $3,030
Total Investments        $433,272
 $437,829
(14)National Technical Systems, Inc. has an undrawn delayed draw term loan of $4,469 par value at LIBOR + 6.00%, 1.00% floor, and an undrawn revolver of $2,031 par value at LIBOR + 6.00%, 1.00% floor. An unused rate of 1.00% and 0.50% is charged on the delayed draw term loan and revolver principal, respectively, while undrawn.
(15)The Hilb Group, LLC has an undrawn delayed draw term loan of $10,034 par value at LIBOR + 5.75%, 1.00% floor. An unused rate of 1.00% is charged on the principal while undrawn.
(16)Vetcor Professional Practices LLC has an undrawn delayed draw term loan of $1,473 par value at LIBOR + 6.00%, 1.00% floor. An unused rate of 1.00% is charged on the principal while undrawn.
(17)Represents a corporate mezzanine loan, which is subordinated to senior secured term loans of the portfolio company.
(18)Ministry Brands, LLC has an undrawn first out delayed draw term loan of $64 par value at LIBOR + 7.00%, 1.00% floor. An unused rate of 1.00% is charged on the delayed draw term loan principal while undrawn.
(19)Ministry Brands, LLC has an undrawn last out delayed draw term loan of $1,530 par value at LIBOR + 7.00%, 1.00% floor. An unused rate of 1.00% is charged on the delayed draw term loan principal while undrawn.

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2015

(dollar amounts in thousands)

As of December 31, 2015, investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated at fair value consisted of the following:

Type

  Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value   % of Fair
Value
 

First Lien Debt

  $800,857    $795,034     75.53

Second Lien Debt

   216,708     210,396     19.98  

Structured Finance Obligations

   59,940     44,812     4.26  

Equity Investments

   2,215     2,424     0.23  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,079,720    $1,052,666     100.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The industrial composition of investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated at fair value as of December 31, 2015 was as follows:

Industry

  Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value   % of Fair
Value
 

Aerospace and Defense

  $64,603    $63,393     6.02

Automotive

   52,908     52,809     5.02  

Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate

   138,700     139,353     13.24  

Business Services

   131,981     130,318     12.38  

Capital Equipment

   18,335     17,993     1.71  

Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber

   27,300     25,902     2.46  

Construction & Building

   19,947     19,958     1.90  

Consumer Services

   51,783     50,764     4.82  

Containers, Packaging & Glass

   55,846     55,128     5.24  

Durable Consumer Goods

   20,648��    20,482     1.94  

Energy: Electricity

   36,630     36,907     3.51  

Energy: Oil & Gas

   11,715     11,327     1.08  

Environmental Industries

   11,782     11,622     1.10  

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

   65,037     64,140     6.09  

High Tech Industries

   50,244     49,782     4.73  

Hotel, Gaming & Leisure

   32,101     31,314     2.97  

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing

   20,827     20,623     1.96  

Metals & Mining

   10,329     10,168     0.97  

Non-durable Consumer Goods

   41,220     40,581     3.85  

Retail

   24,333     24,123     2.29  

Software

   14,573     14,003     1.33  

Structured Finance

   59,940     44,812     4.26  

Telecommunications

   70,565     70,736     6.72  

Transportation: Cargo

   19,582     19,134     1.82  

Transportation: Consumer

   9,110     9,361     0.89  

Utilities: Electric

   5,892     5,704     0.54  

Wholesale

   13,789     12,229     1.16  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,079,720    $1,052,666     100.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2015

(dollar amounts in thousands)

The geographical composition of investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated at fair value as of December 31, 2015 was as follows:

Geography

  Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value   % of Fair
Value
 

Cayman Islands

  $59,940    $44,812     4.26

Ireland

   9,814     9,740     0.93  

United Kingdom

   22,891     22,568     2.14  

United States

   987,075     975,546     92.67  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,079,720    $1,052,666     100.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

As of December 31, 2014

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(1)

 Industry Interest
Rate
  Maturity
Date
   Acquisition
Date
   Par
Amount
   Amortized
Cost (6)
   Fair
Value (7)
  Percentage of
Net Assets
 

First Lien Debt (73.68%)

            

Access CIG, LLC(2)(3)(5)

 Business Services  6.00  10/17/2021     10/16/2014    $15,000    $14,855    $14,865    4.40

Accuvant Finance, LLC(2)(3)(5)

 High Tech Industries  7.00    10/22/2020     4/22/2014     8,988     8,917     8,988    2.66  

ACP Tower Merger Sub, Inc. (Telular
Corporation)(2)(3)(4)

 Telecommunications  5.50    6/24/2019     6/24/2013     5,781     5,764     5,689    1.68  

AF Borrower LLC (Accuvant)(2)(3)(5)

 High Tech Industries  6.25    1/28/2022     12/15/2014     12,000     11,762     11,842    3.50  

Alpha Packaging Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Containers, Packaging & Glass  5.25    5/12/2020     5/12/2014     11,567     11,554     11,301    3.34  

American Tire Distributors, Inc.(2)(3)(5)

 Automotive  5.75    6/1/2018     6/12/2014     3,192     3,193     3,116    0.92  

Anaren, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Telecommunications  5.50    2/18/2021     2/18/2014     11,497     11,396     11,363    3.36  

APX Group, Inc.(5)(8)

 Consumer Services  6.38    12/1/2019     10/15/2014     10,000     9,688     9,575    2.83  

Blue Bird Body Company(2)(3)(4)(8)

 Transportation: Consumer  6.50    6/27/2020     7/22/2014     11,250     10,719     10,940    3.24  

Brooks Equipment Company, LLC(2)(3)(4)

 Construction & Building  6.75    8/29/2020     8/29/2014     7,890     7,826     7,766    2.30  

Capstone Logistics Acquisition, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Transportation: Cargo  5.50    10/7/2021     10/3/2014     19,950     19,757     19,477    5.76  

Castle Management Borrower LLC (Highgate Hotels L.P.)(2)(3)(4)(9)

 Hotel, Gaming & Leisure  5.50    9/18/2020     10/10/2014     8,778     8,693     8,610    2.55  

Central Security Group, Inc. (2)(3)(4) 

 Consumer Services  6.25    10/6/2020     10/3/2014     25,000     24,638     24,780    7.33  

Consolidated Aerospace Manufacturing, LLC. (2)(3)(4) 

 Aerospace & Defense  5.00    3/27/2020     2/28/2014     6,730     6,708     6,558    1.94  

CRCI Holdings Inc. (CLEAResult Consulting,
Inc.)(2)(3)(4)

 Utilities: Electric  5.25    7/10/2019     7/29/2014     5,985     5,962     5,858    1.73  

DTZ U.S. Borrower, LLC(2)(3)(4)

 Construction & Building  5.50    11/5/2021     10/28/2014     10,500     10,347     10,290    3.04  

EP Minerals, LLC(2)(3)(4)

 Metals & Mining  5.50    8/20/2020     8/20/2014     10,474     10,426     10,298    3.04  

FCX Holdings Corp.(2)(3)(4)

 Capital Equipment  5.50    8/4/2020     8/4/2014     10,149     10,141     9,942    2.94  

Genex Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
  5.25    5/30/2021     5/22/2014     4,286     4,268     4,227    1.25  

Green Energy Partners/Stonewall LLC(2)(3)(5)(10)

 Energy: Electricity  6.50    11/13/2021     11/12/2014     8,300     8,136   �� 8,338    2.46  

Hercules Achievement, Inc. (Varsity Brands Holding Co., Inc.)(2)(3)(5)

 Durable Consumer Goods  6.00    12/11/2021     12/10/2014     20,000     19,803     19,820    5.86  

Indra Holdings Corp. (Totes Isotoner)(2)(3)(5)

 Non-durable Consumer Goods  5.25    5/1/2021     4/29/2014     14,925     14,790     14,701    4.35  

Landslide Holdings, Inc. (LANDesk Software)(2)(3)(4)

 Software  5.00    2/25/2020     2/25/2014     9,875     9,878     9,705    2.87  

Meritas Schools Holdings, LLC(2)(3)(4)

 Consumer Services  7.00    6/25/2019     6/21/2013     7,080     7,025     7,138    2.11  

Miller Heiman, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Business Services  6.75    9/30/2019     10/1/2013     19,719     19,479     19,338    5.72  

MRI Software LLC(2)(3)(4)

 Software  5.25    2/4/2021     1/31/2014     14,888     14,823     14,560    4.30  

MSX International, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Automotive  6.00    8/21/2020     8/18/2014     11,176     11,072     11,039    3.26  

NES Global Talent Finance US LLC (United Kingdom) (2)(3)(4)(8)

 Energy: Oil & Gas  6.50    10/3/2019     10/2/2013     12,188     11,988     12,188    3.60  

Novetta, LLC(2)(3)(4)

 Aerospace & Defense  6.00    10/2/2020     11/19/2014     12,220     12,112     12,017    3.55  

Pelican Products, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Containers, Packaging & Glass  5.25    4/11/2020     4/8/2014     7,897     7,915     7,748    2.29  

Prowler Acquisition Corp. (Pipeline Supply and Service, LLC)(2)(3)(4)

 Wholesale  5.50    1/28/2020     1/24/2014     11,024     10,933     10,764    3.18  

PSC Industrial Holdings Corp(2)(3)(4)

 Environmental Industries  7.00    12/5/2020     12/5/2014     12,000     11,884     11,820    3.50  

QoL Meds, LLC(2)(3)(4)

 Retail  5.50    7/15/2020     7/14/2014     12,988     12,929     12,757    3.77  

RCHP, Inc. (Regionalcare)(2)(3)(4)

 Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals  6.00    4/23/2019     4/21/2014     19,792     19,612     19,630    5.80  

SolAero Technologies Corp.(2)(3)(4)

 Telecommunications  5.75    12/10/2020     12/9/2014     11,250     11,150     10,936    3.23  

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2014

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(1)

 Industry Interest
Rate
  Maturity
Date
   Acquisition
Date
   Par
Amount
   Amortized
Cost (6)
   Fair
Value (7)
  Percentage of
Net Assets
 

First Lien Debt (73.68%) (continued)

            

Stafford Logistics, Inc. (Custom Ecology, Inc.)(2)(3)(4)

 Environmental Industries  6.75  6/26/2019     7/1/2013    $9,540    $9,466    $9,006    2.66

Sterling Infosystems, Inc(2)(3)(4)

 Business Services  5.50    5/13/2021     5/12/2014     8,955     8,916     8,895    2.63  

Synarc-Biocore Holdings, LLC(2) (3) (4)

 Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals  5.50    3/10/2021     3/6/2014     13,399     13,280     12,953    3.83  

Systems Maintenance Services Holding, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 High Tech Industries  5.00    10/18/2019     10/18/2013     2,215     2,208     2,170    0.64  

TASC, Inc.(2)(3)(5)(8)

 Aerospace & Defense  7.00    5/23/2020     12/17/2014     20,000     19,200     19,600    5.79  

The SI Organization, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Aerospace & Defense  5.75    11/23/2019     5/16/2014     9,372     9,288     9,465    2.80  

The Topps Company, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Non-durable Consumer Goods  7.25    10/2/2018     10/1/2013     11,512     11,422     11,363    3.36  

TruckPro, LLC(2) (3) (4)

 Automotive  5.75    8/6/2018     8/6/2013     9,499     9,456     9,415    2.78  

Violin Finco S.A.R.L. (Alexander Mann Solutions) (United Kingdom)(2)(3)(4)(8)

 Business Services  5.75    12/20/2019     12/18/2013     12,375     12,274     12,375    3.66  

Vitera Healthcare Solutions, LLC(2) (3) (4)

 Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals  6.00    11/4/2020     11/1/2013     9,533     9,453     9,462    2.80  

Zest Holdings, LLC(2)(3)(4)

 Durable Consumer Goods  5.25    8/16/2020     8/18/2014     12,344     12,344     12,099    3.58  
         

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

First Lien Debt Total

         $517,450    $514,787    152.19
         

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Second Lien Debt (15.44%)

            

AF Borrower LLC (Accuvant)(2)(3)(5)

 High Tech Industries  10.00  1/30/2023     12/15/2014    $8,000    $7,921    $7,839    2.32

Allied Security Holdings LLC(2)(3)(5)

 Business Services  8.00    8/13/2021     9/25/2014     8,000     7,942     7,850    2.32  

Ascensus Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
  9.00    12/2/2020     12/2/2013     8,000     7,896     7,983    2.36  

Berlin Packaging L.L.C.(2)(3)(5)

 Containers, Packaging & Glass  7.75    10/1/2022     9/24/2014     9,200     9,132     9,062    2.68  

Creganna Finance (US) LLC (Ireland)(2)(3)(5)(8)

 Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals  9.00    6/1/2022     11/20/2014     9,900     9,804     9,402    2.78  

Drew Marine Group Inc.(2)(3)(5)

 Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber  8.00    5/19/2021     11/19/2013     12,500     12,475     11,720    3.46  

Genex Holdings, Inc.(2)(3)(5)

 Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
  8.75    5/30/2022     5/22/2014     4,990     4,936     4,740    1.40  

Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.(2)(3)(5)

 Banking, Finance, Insurance &
Real Estate
  8.50    4/30/2022     4/30/2014     12,500     12,386     11,600    3.43  

Jazz Acquisition, Inc. (Wencor)(2)(3)(5)

 Aerospace & Defense  7.75    6/19/2022     6/25/2014     6,700     6,671     6,283    1.86  

Landslide Holdings, Inc. (LANDesk Software)(2)(3)(5)

 Software  8.25    2/25/2021     2/25/2014     3,500     3,477     3,335    0.99  

Phillips-Medisize Corporation(2)(3)(5)

 Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber  8.25    6/16/2022     6/13/2014     5,000     4,954     4,743    1.40  

Prowler Acquisition Corp. (Pipeline Supply and Service, LLC)(2)(3)(5)

 Wholesale  9.50    7/28/2020     1/24/2014     3,000     2,947     2,816    0.83  

Systems Maintenance Services Holding, Inc.(2)(3)(4)

 High Tech Industries  9.25    10/18/2020     10/18/2013     6,000     5,953     5,830    1.72  

TASC, Inc.(5)(8)

 Aerospace & Defense  12.00    5/23/2021     12/17/2014     6,000     5,880     6,060    1.79  

Vitera Healthcare Solutions, LLC(2)(3)(5)

 Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals  9.25    11/4/2021     11/1/2013     2,000     1,973     1,929    0.57  

Watchfire Enterprises, Inc.(2)(3)(5)

 Media: Advertising, Printing &
Publishing
  9.00    10/2/2021     10/2/2013     7,000     6,914     6,682    1.98  
         

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Second Lien Debt Total

         $111,261    $107,874    31.89
         

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)

As of December 31, 2014

(dollar amounts in thousands)

Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(1)

  Industry  Maturity
Date
   Acquisition
Date
   Par
Amount
   Amortized
Cost (6)
   Fair
Value (7)
   Percentage of
Net Assets
 

Structured Finance Obligations (10.88%) (5)(8)(11)

              

1776 CLO I, Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   5/8/2020     2/27/2014    $11,750    $10,106    $8,813     2.61

AIMCO CLO, Series 2014-A, Class F, 5.47%(2)

  Structured Finance   7/20/2026     5/12/2014     2,700     2,350     2,187     0.65  

AIMCO CLO, Series 2014-A, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   7/20/2026     5/12/2014     11,500     9,732     9,832     2.91  

Ares XXVIII CLO Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   10/17/2024     10/10/2013     7,000     5,242     5,278     1.56  

Babson CLO Ltd. 2005-I, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   4/15/2019     7/16/2013     7,632     432     161     0.05  

Blackrock Senior Income Series V, Limited, Subordinated Notes (Ireland)

  Structured Finance   8/13/2019     3/11/2014     4,600     2,592     2,521     0.75  

CIFC Funding 2007-III, Ltd., Income Notes

  Structured Finance   7/26/2021     5/20/2014     6,500     3,525     3,510     1.04  

Clydesdale CLO 2005, Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   12/6/2017     7/15/2013     5,750     —      10     0.00  

Flagship VII Limited, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   1/20/2026     12/18/2013     7,000     5,823     5,628     1.66  

GoldenTree Loan Opportunities V, Limited, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   10/18/2021     10/11/2013     5,000     3,136     2,920     0.86  

ING Investment Management CLO IV, Ltd., Preferred Shares

  Structured Finance   6/14/2022     5/7/2014     8,925     5,327     5,690     1.68  

ING IM CLO 2012-1 LLC, Preferred Shares

  Structured Finance   3/14/2022     12/5/2014     3,500     2,367     2,494     0.74  

ING IM CLO 2012-1 LLC, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   3/14/2022     12/5/2014     2,500     1,691     1,781     0.53  

Landmark VIII, CLO Ltd., Income Notes

  Structured Finance   10/19/2020     10/22/2013     8,600     3,603     3,337     0.99  

MSIM Peconic Bay, Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   7/20/2019     10/22/2013     4,500     1,210     1,018     0.30  

Nautique Funding Ltd., Income Notes

  Structured Finance   4/15/2020     2/24/2014     5,000     2,991     2,980     0.88  

Pacifica CDO V, Ltd., Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   1/26/2020     3/28/2014     4,700     87     70     0.02  

Steele Creek CLO 2014-I, LLC, Subordinated Notes

  Structured Finance   8/21/2026     7/18/2014     18,000     15,030     14,040     4.15  

Venture VI CDO Limited, Preference Shares

  Structured Finance   8/3/2020     4/17/2014     7,000     3,746     3,731     1.09  
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Structured Finance Obligations Total

          $78,990    $76,001     22.47
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

          $707,701    $698,662     206.55
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, issuers of debt investments held by GMS FinanceCredit Fund are domiciled in the United States and issuers of structured finance obligations are domiciled in the Cayman Islands. Under the Investment Company Act, the Company would be deemed to “control” a portfolio company if the Company owned more than 25% of its outstanding voting securities and/or held the power to exercise control over the management or policies of the portfolio company.States. As of December 31, 2014,2016, the Company does not “control” anygeographical composition of these portfolio companies. Underinvestments as a percentage of fair value was 2.43% in Canada and 97.57% in the Investment Company Act, the Company would be deemed an “affiliated person” of a portfolio company if the Company owns 5% or more of the portfolio company’s outstanding voting securities. As of December 31, 2014, the Company is not an “affiliated person” of any of these portfolio companies.United States.
(2)Variable rate loans to the portfolio companies and variable rate notes of structured finance obligations bear interest at a rate that may be determined by reference to either LIBOR or an alternate base rate (commonly based on the Federal Funds Rate or the U.S. Prime Rate), which generally resets quarterly. For each such loan, and note, the CompanyCredit Fund has provided the interest rate in effect as of December 31, 2014.2016. As of December 31, 2016, all of Credit Fund’s LIBOR loans were indexed to the 90-day LIBOR rate at 1.00%, except for those loans as indicated in Note 11 below, and the U.S. Prime Rate loan was indexed at 3.75%.
(3)Loan includes interest rate floor feature.
(4)TheseDenotes that all or a portion of the assets are owned by the BorrowerCredit Fund Sub. The BorrowerCredit Fund Sub has entered into the Revolving Credit Facility.a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Fund Sub Facility”). The lenders of the Revolving Credit Fund Sub Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Borrower Sub (see Note 5, Borrowings).Credit Fund Sub. Accordingly, such assets are not available to creditors of the Company.Credit Fund.


(5)These assets are owned by the Company. The Company has entered into the Facility, which was subsequently amended on January 8, 2015. The lenders of the Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the portfolio investments held by the Company. The lenders of the Facility also have a perfected first-priority security interest in the unfunded investor equity capital commitments (provided that the amount of unfunded capital commitments ultimately available to the lenders is limited to $100,000) and such security interest will be released once the Company receives equity capital contributions in an amount equal to $100,000 subsequent to January 8, 2015 (see Note 5, Borrowings).

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2014

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(6)(5)Amortized cost represents original cost, including origination fees and upfront fees received that are deemed to be an adjustment to yield, adjusted for the accretion/amortization of discounts/premiums, as applicable, on debt investments using the effective interest method. Equity tranche collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) fund investments, which are referred to as “structured finance obligations”, are recorded at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
(7)
(6)
Fair value is determined in good faith by or under the direction of the Boardboard of Directorsmanagers of Credit Fund, pursuant to Credit Fund’s valuation policy, which is substantially similar to the valuation policy of the Company (see Notes 2 and 3), pursuant to the Company’s valuation policies.provided in “—Critical Accounting Policies—Fair Value Measurements.
(8)The Company has determined the indicated investments are non-qualifying assets under Section 55(a)
(7)Denotes that all or a portion of the Investment Company Act. Underassets are owned by Credit Fund. Credit Fund has entered into the Investment Company Act, the Company may not acquire any non-qualifying assets unless, at the time such acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70%Credit Fund Facility. The lenders of the Company’s total assets.Credit Fund Facility have a first lien security interest in substantially all of the assets of Credit Fund. Accordingly, such assets are not available to creditors of Credit Fund Sub.
(9)Castle Management Borrower LLC (Highgate Hotels L.P.) has an undrawn delayed draw term loan of $1,200 par value at LIBOR + 4.50%, 1.00% floor. An unused
(8)Credit Fund receives less than the stated interest rate of 1.00%this loan as a result of an agreement among lenders. The interest rate reduction is charged1.25% on EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP). Pursuant to the agreement among lenders in respect of this loan, this investment represents a first lien/first out loan, which has first priority ahead of the first lien/last out loan with respect to principal, while undrawn. The delayed draw term loan is owned by the Company.interest and other payments.
(9)In addition to the interest earned based on the stated interest rate of this loan, which is the amount reflected in this schedule, Credit Fund is entitled to receive additional interest as a result of an agreement among lenders as follows: EIP Merger Sub, LLC (Evolve IP) (3.84%). Pursuant to the agreement among lenders in respect of this loan, this investment represents a first lien/last out loan, which has a secondary priority behind the first lien/first out loan with respect to principal, interest and other payments.
(10)Green Energy Partners/Stonewall LLC has an undrawnAs of December 31, 2016, Credit Fund had the following unfunded commitments to fund delayed draw term loan of $8,300 par value at LIBOR + 5.50%, 1.00% floor. An unused rate of 3.00% is charged on the principal while undrawn.and revolving senior secured loans:
First Lien Debt – unfunded delayed draw and revolving term loans commitments Type Unused Fee Par/ Principal Amount Fair Value
Diversitech Corporation Delayed Draw 1.00% $5,000
 $
Jensen Hughes, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 2,000
 (7)
Jensen Hughes, Inc. Delayed Draw 0.50% 1,461
 (5)
MSHC, Inc. Delayed Draw 1.50% 1,790
 (21)
QW Holding Corporation (Quala) Revolver 1.00% 5,086
 14
QW Holding Corporation (Quala) Delayed Draw 1.00% 5,918
 17
RelaDyne Inc. Revolver 0.50% 2,162
 (6)
RelaDyne Inc. Delayed Draw 0.50% 1,824
 (5)
T2 Systems, Inc. Revolver 1.00% 1,955
 20
The Original Cakerie, Ltd. (Canada) Revolver 0.50% 1,665
 
Zywave, Inc. Revolver 0.50% 1,500
 (5)
Total unfunded commitments     $30,361
 $2
(11)As of December 31, 2014,2016, this LIBOR loan was indexed to the Company has a greater than 25% but less than 50% equity or subordinated notes ownership interest in certain structured finance obligations. These investments have governing documents that preclude the Company from controlling management of the entity and therefore the Company has determined that the issuer of the investment is not a controlled affiliate or a non-controlled affiliate because the investments are not “voting securities”30-day LIBOR rate at 0.77%.

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)



Below is certain summarized consolidated financial information for Credit Fund as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Credit Fund commenced operations in May 2016.
 December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Information  
ASSETS  
Investments, at fair value (amortized cost of $983,669 and $433,272, respectively)$984,773
$437,829
Cash and other assets26,441
11,326
Total assets$1,011,214
$449,155
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY  
Secured borrowings$377,686
$248,540
2017-1 Notes payable, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $2,051348,938

Mezzanine loans85,750
62,384
Other liabilities25,308
63,684
Subordinated loans and members’ equity173,532
74,547
Liabilities and members’ equity$1,011,214
$449,155
   
 For the years ended
 December 31, 2017December 31, 2016
Selected Consolidated Statement of Operations Information:  
Total investment income$49,504
$9,973
Expenses  
Interest and credit facility expenses29,191
5,410
Other expenses3,493
1,266
Total expenses32,684
6,676
Net investment income (loss)16,820
3,297
Net realized gain (loss) on investments17
41
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments(3,453)4,557
Net increase (decrease) resulting from operations$13,384
$7,895

Debt
Credit Fund Facility
On June 24, 2016, Credit Fund entered into the Credit Fund Facility with the Company pursuant to which Credit Fund may from time to time request mezzanine loans from the Company, which was subsequently amended on June 5, 2017, October 2, 2017 and November 3, 2017. The maximum principal amount of the Credit Fund Facility is $175,000. The maturity date of the Credit Fund Facility is June 22, 2018. Amounts borrowed under the Credit Fund Facility bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 9.00%.
During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were mezzanine loan borrowings of $135,960 and $84,784, respectively, and repayments of $112,594 and $22,400 under the Credit Fund Facility. As of December 31, 2014

(dollar amounts2017 and 2016, there were $85,750 and $62,384 in thousands)

mezzanine loans outstanding.

As of December 31, 2014, investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated at fair value consisted2017 and 2016, Credit Fund was in compliance with all covenants and other requirements of the following:

Type

  Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value   % of Fair
Value
 

First Lien Debt

  $517,450    $514,787     73.68

Second Lien Debt

   111,261     107,874     15.44  

Structured Finance Obligations

   78,990     76,001     10.88  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $707,701    $698,662     100.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Credit Fund Facility.

Credit Fund Sub Facility
On June 24, 2016, Credit Fund Sub closed on the Credit Fund Sub Facility with lenders, which was subsequently
amended on May 31, 2017 and October 27, 2017. The industrial compositionCredit Fund Sub Facility provides for secured borrowings during the applicable revolving period up to an amount equal to $640,000. The facility is secured by a first lien security interest in substantially all of investments—non-controlled/non-affiliatedthe portfolio investments held by Credit Fund Sub. The maturity date of the Credit Fund Sub Facility is May 22, 2023. Amounts borrowed under the Credit Fund Sub Facility bear interest at fair value asa rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%.


During the year ended December 31, 2014 was as follows:

Industry

  Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value   % of Fair
Value
 

Aerospace and Defense

  $59,859    $59,983     8.59

Automotive

   23,721     23,570     3.37  

Banking, Finance, Insurance & Real Estate

   29,486     28,550     4.09  

Business Services

   63,466     63,323     9.06  

Capital Equipment

   10,141     9,942     1.42  

Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber

   17,429     16,463     2.36  

Construction & Building

   18,173     18,056     2.58  

Consumer Services

   41,351     41,493     5.94  

Containers, Packaging & Glass

   28,601     28,111     4.02  

Durable Consumer Goods

   32,147     31,919     4.57  

Energy: Electricity

   8,136     8,338     1.19  

Energy: Oil & Gas

   11,988     12,188     1.74  

Environmental Industries

   21,350     20,826     2.98  

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

   54,122     53,376     7.64  

High Tech Industries

   36,761     36,669     5.25  

Hotel, Gaming & Leisure

   8,693     8,610     1.23  

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing

   6,914     6,682     0.96  

Metals & Mining

   10,426     10,298     1.47  

Non-durable Consumer Goods

   26,212     26,064     3.73  

Retail

   12,929     12,757     1.83  

Software

   28,178     27,600     3.95  

Structured Finance

   78,990     76,001     10.88  

Telecommunications

   28,310     27,988     4.01  

Transportation: Cargo

   19,757     19,477     2.79  

Transportation: Consumer

   10,719     10,940     1.57  

Utilities: Electric

   5,962     5,858     0.84  

Wholesale

   13,880     13,580     1.94  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $707,701    $698,662     100.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)

2017 and 2016, there were secured borrowings of $466,605 and $248,540, respectively, and repayments of $337,459 and $0, respectively, under the Credit Fund Sub Facility. As of December 31, 2014

(dollar amounts2017 and 2016, there was $377,686 and $248,540 in thousands)

The geographical composition of investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated at fair value as of December 31, 2014 was as follows:

Geography

  Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value   % of Fair
Value
 

Cayman Islands

  $76,398    $73,480     10.52

Ireland

   12,396     11,923     1.70  

United Kingdom

   24,262     24,563     3.51  

United States

   594,645     588,696     84.27  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $707,701    $698,662     100.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

secured borrowings outstanding respectively.

As of December 31, 2015

(dollar amounts2017 and 2016, Credit Fund Sub was in thousands, except per share data)

1. ORGANIZATION

Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc. (“GMS Finance” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation formed on February 8, 2012,compliance with all covenants and structured as an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company. On May 2, 2013, GMS Finance filed its election to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (together with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the “Investment Company Act”). GMS Finance has elected to be treated, and intends to continue to comply with the requirements to qualify annually, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

GMS Finance’s investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation primarily through debt investments in U.S. middle market companies, which the Company defines as companies with approximately $10 million to $100 million of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”). GMS Finance seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in first lien senior secured loans (which may include stand-alone first lien loans; “last out” first lien loans, which are loans that have a secondary priority behind “first out” first lien loans; “unitranche” loans, which are loans that combine features of first lien, second lien or subordinated loans, generally in a first lien position; and secured corporate bonds with features similar to the features of these categories of first lien loans) and second lien senior secured loans (which may include senior secured loans, and, to a lesser extent, secured corporate bonds, with a secondary priority behind first lien loans) (collectively, “Middle Market Senior Loans”). The Middle Market Senior Loans are generally made to private U.S. middle market companies that are, in many cases, controlled by private equity firms. Depending on market conditions, GMS Finance expects that between 70% and 80% of the value of its assets will be invested in Middle Market Senior Loans, with the balance invested in higher-yielding investments, which may include middle market junior loans such as corporate mezzanine loans, equity co-investments, broadly syndicated first lien and second lien senior secured loans, high-yield bonds, structured finance obligations and/or other opportunistic investments. GMS Finance expects that the composition of its portfolio will change over time given Carlyle GMS Investment Management L.L.C.’s (the “Investment Adviser”) view on, among other things, the economic and credit environment (including with respect to interest rates) in which the Company is operating.

On May 2, 2013, GMS Finance completed its initial closing of capital commitments (the “Initial Closing”) and subsequently commenced substantial investment operations. Prior to May 2, 2013, GMS Finance had not commenced operations and was a development stage company as defined by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915,Development Stage Entity. During this time, GMS Finance focused substantially all of its efforts on establishing its business. If GMS Finance has not consummated an initial public offering of its common stock that results in an unaffiliated public float of at least 15% of the aggregate capital commitments received prior to the date of such initial public offering (a “Qualified IPO”) by May 2, 2018, then GMS Finance (subject to any necessary stockholder approvals and applicable requirements of the Investment Company Act) will use its best efforts to wind down and/or liquidate and dissolve.

GMS Finance is an “emerging growth company” as defined inCredit Fund Sub Facility.

2017-1 Notes
On December 19, 2017, Credit Fund completed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012. GMS Finance will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years following an initial public offering, although if the market value of the common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, GMS Finance would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31.

Carlyle GMS Finance SPV LLC (the “Borrower Sub”) is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed on January 3, 2013. The Borrower Sub invests in first and second lien senior secured loans. The

Borrower Sub is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and is consolidated in these consolidated financial statements commencing from the date of its formation, January 3, 2013.

On June 26, 2015, the Company completed a $400 million term debt securitization (the “2015-12017-1 Debt Securitization”).Securitization. The notes offered in the 2015-12017-1 Debt Securitization (the “2015-1“2017-1 Notes”) were issued by Carlyle GMS Finance MM CLO 2015-1 LLC (the “2015-1 Issuer”),the 2017-1 Issuer, a wholly-ownedwholly owned and consolidated subsidiary of the Company,Credit Fund, and are secured by a diversified portfolio of the 2015-12017-1 Issuer consisting primarily of first and second lien senior secured loans. ReferThe 2017-1 Debt Securitization was executed through a private placement of the 2017-1 Notes, consisting of $231,700 of Aaa/AAA Class A-1 Notes, which bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 1.17%; $48,300 of Aa2/AA Class A-2 Notes, which bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 1.50%; $15,000 of A2/A Class B-1 Notes, which bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.25%; $9,000 of A2/A Class B-2 Notes which bear interest at 4.30%; $22,900 of Baa2/BBB Class C Notes which bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 3.20%; and $25,100 of Ba2/BB Class D Notes which bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 6.38%. The 2017-1 Notes are scheduled to Note 6 for details. The 2015-1 Issuer is consolidated in these consolidated financial statements commencing frommature on January 15, 2028. Credit Fund received 100% of the date of its formation, May 8, 2015.

GMS Finance is externally managedpreferred interests issued by the Investment Adviser, an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Carlyle GMS Finance Administration L.L.C.2017-1 Issuer (the “Administrator”“2017-1 Issuer Preferred Interests”) provides the administrative services necessary for GMS Finance to operate. Both the Investment Adviser and the Administrator are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., a subsidiary of The Carlyle Group L.P. “Carlyle” refers to The Carlyle Group L.P., its affiliates and its consolidated subsidiaries, a global alternative asset manager publicly traded on NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CG”. Refer to the sec.gov website for further information on Carlyle.

As a BDC, GMS Finance is required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. As part of these requirements, the Company must not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” specified in the Investment Company Act unless, at the time the acquisition is made, at least 70% of its total assets are qualifying assets (with certain limited exceptions).

GMS Finance has elected to be treated, and intends to continue to comply with the requirements to qualify annually, as a RIC under the Code, and operates in a manner so as to qualify for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. To qualify as a RIC, GMS Finance must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements and timely distribute to its stockholders generally at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each year. Pursuant to this election, GMS Finance generally does not have to pay corporate level taxes on any income that it distributes to stockholders, provided that GMS Finance satisfies those requirements.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The Company is an investment company for the purposes of accounting and financial reporting in accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-08,Financial Services—Investment Companies (“ASU 2013-08”):Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure Requirements. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GMS Finance and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Borrower Sub and the 2015-1 Issuer. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. US GAAP for an investment company requires investments to be recorded at fair value. The carrying value for all other assets and liabilities approximates their fair value.

The annual financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP for annual financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-K and Article 6 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for the fair presentation of consolidated financial statements for the years presented have been included.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make assumptions and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of

contingent assets and liabilities at theclosing date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management’s estimates are based on historical experiences and other factors, including expectations of future events that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. It also requires management to exercise judgment2017-1 Debt Securitization in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. Assumptions and estimates regarding the valuation of investments and their resulting impact on base management and incentive fees involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and these assumptions and estimates may be significantexchange for Credit Fund's contribution to the consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates and such differences could be material.

Investments

Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the amortized cost basis2017-1 Issuer of the investment using the specific identification method without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized,initial closing date loan portfolio. The 2017-1 Issuer Preferred Interests do not bear interest and includes investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments as presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations reflects the net change in the fairhad a nominal value of investments, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized. See Note 3 for further information about fair value measurements.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments (e.g. money market funds, U.S. treasury notes) with original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are carried$47,900 at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held with two large financial institutions and cash held in such financial institutions may, at times, exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit.

Revenue Recognition

Interest from Investments and Realized Gain/Loss on Investments

Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis and includes the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums. Discounts from and premiums to par value on debt securities purchased are accreted/amortized into interest income over the life of the respective security using the effective interest method. The amortized cost of debt investments represents the original cost, including origination fees, adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums, if any. At time of exit, the realized gain or loss on an investment is the difference between the amortized cost at time of exit and the cash received at exit using the specific identification method.

The Company may have loans in its portfolio that contain payment-in-kind (“PIK”) provisions. PIK represents interest that is accrued and recorded as interest income at the contractual rates, increases the loan principal on the respective capitalization dates, and is generally due at maturity. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the years then ended, no loans in the portfolio contained PIK provisions.

Interest income from investments in the “equity” class of collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) funds, which are included in “structured finance obligations”, is recorded based upon an estimation of an effective yield to expected maturity utilizing assumed cash flows in accordance with ASC 325-40,Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financials Assets. We monitor the expected cash inflows from our CLO equity investments, including the expected residual payments and the effective yield is determined and updated at least quarterly. In estimating these cash flows, there are a number of assumptions that are subject to uncertainties, including the amount and timing of principal payments which are impacted by prepayments, repurchases, defaults, delinquencies and liquidations of or within the CLO funds. These uncertainties are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that could have impacted the Company’s estimates if the information was known at the time. As a result, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Other Income

Other income may include income such as consent, waiver and amendment fees associated with the Company’s investment activities as well as any fees for managerial assistance services rendered by the Company to portfolio companies. Such fees are recognized as income when earned or the services are rendered. The Company may receive fees for guaranteeing the outstanding debt of a portfolio company. Such fees will be amortized into other income over the life of the guarantee. The unamortized amount, if any, is included in other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

Non-Accrual Income

Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest payments are past due 30 days or more or when there is reasonable doubt that principal or interest will be collected in full. Accrued and unpaid interest is generally reversed when a loan is placed on non-accrual status. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment regarding collectability. Non-accrual loans are restored to accrual status when past due principal and interest are paid current and, in management’s judgment, are likely to remain current. Management may not place a loan on non-accrual status if the loan has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and for the years then ended, no loans in the portfolio were on non-accrual status.

Revolving Credit Facility, Facility and 2015-1 Notes Related Costs, Expenses and Deferred Financing Costs (See Note 5, Borrowings, and Note 6, 2015-1 Notes)

Interest expense and unused commitment fees on the Revolving Credit Facility and Facility are recorded on an accrual basis. Unused commitment fees are included in credit facility fees in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Revolving Credit Facility and Facility are recorded at carrying value, which approximates fair value.

Deferred financing costs include capitalized expenses related to the closing of the Revolving Credit Facility and Facility. Amortization of deferred financing costs for each credit facility is computed on the straight-line basis over the respective term of each credit facility, except for a portion that was accelerated in connection with the amendment of the Revolving Credit Facility as described in Note 5. The amortization of such costs is included in credit facility fees in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Deferred financing costs also include capitalized expenses including structuring and arrangement fees related to the offering of the 2015-1 Notes. Amortization of deferred financing costs for the 2015-1 Notes is computed on the effective yield method over the term of 2015-1 Notes. The amortization of such costs is included in interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Organization and Offering Costs

The Company agreed to reimburse the Investment Adviser for initial organization and offering costs incurred on behalf of GMS Finance up to $1,500. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $1,500 of organization and offering costs had been incurred by GMS Finance and $57 of excess organization and offering costs had been incurred by the Investment Adviser since inception. The $1,500 of incurred organization and offering costs are allocated to all stockholders based on their respective capital commitment and are re-allocated amongst all stockholders at the time of each capital drawdown subsequent to the Initial Closing. The Company’s organization costs incurred are expensed and the offering costs are charged against equity when incurred.

Income Taxes

For federal income tax purposes, GMS Finance has elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code, and intends to make the required distributions to its stockholders as specified therein. In order to qualify as a RIC, GMS Finance must meet certain minimum distribution, source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. If such requirements are met, then GMS Finance is generally required to pay income taxes only on the portion of its taxable income and gains it does not distribute.

The minimum distribution requirements applicable to RICs require GMS Finance to distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (“ICTI”), as defined by the Code, each year. Depending on the level of ICTI earned in a tax year, GMS Finance may choose to carry forward ICTI in excess of current year distributions into the next tax year. Any such carryover ICTI must be distributed before the end of that next tax year through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which generated such ICTI.

In addition, based on the excise distribution requirements, GMS Finance is subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on undistributed income unless GMS Finance distributes in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of its ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of capital gain net income (both long-term and short-term) for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in the preceding year. For this purpose, however, any ordinary income or capital gain net income retained by GMS Finance that is subject to corporate income tax is considered to have been distributed. GMS Finance intends to make sufficient distributions each taxable year to satisfy the excise distribution requirements.

The Company evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing its consolidated financial statements to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely than not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. All penalties and interest associated with income taxes, if any, are included in income tax expense.

The Borrower Sub and the 2015-1 Issuer are disregarded entities for tax purposes and are consolidated with the tax return of GMS Finance.

Capital Calls and Dividends and Distributions to Common Stockholders

The Company records the shares issued in connection with capital calls as of the effective date of the capital call. To the extent that the Company has taxable income available, the Company intends to make quarterly distributions to its common stockholders. Dividends and distributions to common stockholders are recorded on the record date. The amount to be distributed is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is generally based upon the taxable earnings estimated by management and available cash. Net realized capital gains, if any, are generally distributed at least annually, although the Company may decide to retain such capital gains for investment.

The Company has adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of any distributions on behalf of its stockholders, for those who have elected to participate in the plan. As a result of adopting such a plan, if the Board of Directors authorizes, and GMS Finance declares a cash dividend or distribution, the stockholders who have elected to participate in the dividend reinvestment plan would have their cash dividends or distributions automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock, rather than receiving cash. Prior to a Qualified IPO, the Company intends to use primarily newly issued shares of its common stock to implement the plan issued at the net asset value per share most recently determined by the Board of Directors. After a Qualified IPO, the Company intends to use primarily newly issued shares to implement the plan so long as the market value per share is equal to or greater than the net asset value per share as of the close of business on the relevant payment date for such dividend or distribution. If the market value per

share is less than the net asset value per share as of the close of business on the relevant payment date, the plan administrator would purchase the common stock on behalf of participants in the open market, unless the Company instructs the plan administrator otherwise.

Functional Currency

The functional currency of the Company is the U.S. Dollar and all transactions were in U.S. Dollars.

Recent Accounting Standards Updates

On April 7, 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2015-3,Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-3”). ASU 2015-3 requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts and premiums. This guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2016 and the ASU requires the guidance to be applied on a retrospective basis. This guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In August 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2015-15, Interest—Imputation of Interest (Sub-topic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-03 does not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. In accordance with ASU 2015-15, an entity may defer and present debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortize the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. This guidance is effective for the Company on January 1, 2016 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company applies fair value accounting in accordance with the terms of Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurement(“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value as the amount that would be exchanged to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transfer between market participants at the measurement date. The Company values securities/instruments traded in active markets on the measurement date by multiplying the closing price of such traded securities/instruments by the quantity of shares or amount of the instrument held. The Company may also obtain quotes with respect to certain of its investments, such as its securities/instruments traded in active markets and its liquid securities/instruments that are not traded in active markets, from pricing services, brokers, or counterparties (i.e., “consensus pricing”). When doing so, the Company determines whether the quote obtained is sufficient according to US GAAP to determine the fair value of the security. The Company may use the quote obtained or alternative pricing sources may be utilized including valuation techniques typically utilized for illiquid securities/instruments.

Securities/instruments that are illiquid or for which the pricing source does not provide a valuation or methodology or provides a valuation or methodology that, in the judgment of the Investment Adviser or GMS Finance’s Board of Directors, does not represent fair value shall each be valued as of the measurement date using all techniques appropriate under the circumstances and for which sufficient data is available. These valuation techniques may vary by investment and include comparable public market valuations, comparable precedent transaction valuations and/or discounted cash flow analyses. The process generally used to determine the applicable value is as follows: (i) the value of each portfolio company or investment is initially reviewed by the investment professionals responsible for such portfolio company or investment and, for non-traded investments, a standardized template designed to approximate fair market value based on observable market inputs, updated credit statistics and unobservable inputs is used to determine a preliminary value, which is also reviewed alongside consensus pricing, where available; (ii) preliminary valuation conclusions are documented and

reviewed by a valuation committee comprised of members of senior management; (iii) the Board of Directors engages a third-party valuation firm to provide positive assurance on portions of the Middle Market Senior Loans and equity investments portfolio each quarter (such that each non-traded investment is reviewed by a third-party valuation firm at least once on a rolling twelve month basis) including a review of management’s preliminary valuation and conclusion on fair value; (iv) the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) reviews the assessments of the Investment Adviser and the third-party valuation firm and provides the Board of Directors with any recommendations with respect to changes to the fair value of each investment in the portfolio; and (v) the Board of Directors discusses the valuation recommendations of the Audit Committee and determines the fair value of each investment in the portfolio in good faith based on the input of the Investment Adviser and, where applicable, the third-party valuation firm.

All factors that might materially impact the value of an investment are considered, including, but not limited to the assessment of the following factors, as relevant:

closing.
the nature and realizable value of any collateral;

call features, put features and other relevant terms of debt;6. BORROWINGS

the portfolio company’s leverage and ability to make payments;

the portfolio company’s public or private credit rating;

the portfolio company’s actual and expected earnings and discounted cash flow;

prevailing interest rates and spreads for similar securities and expected volatility in future interest rates;

the markets in which the portfolio company does business and recent economic and/or market events; and

comparisons to comparable transactions and publicly traded securities.

Investment performance data utilized are the most recently available financial statements and compliance certificates received from the portfolio companies as of the measurement date which in many cases may reflect a lag in information.

Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments may fluctuate from period to period. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, these estimated values may differ significantly from the values that would have been reported had a ready market for the investments existed, and it is reasonably possible that the difference could be material.

In addition, changes in the market environment and other events that may occur over the life of the investments may cause the realized gains or losses on investments to be different from the net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation currently reflected in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

US GAAP establishes a hierarchical disclosure framework which ranks the level of observability of market price inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment and state of the marketplace, including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Investments with readily available quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from quoted prices in active markets generally have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment applied in determining fair value.

Investments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed based on the observability of inputs used in determination of fair values, as follows:

Level I—inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. The types of financial instruments in Level I generally include unrestricted securities, including equities and derivatives, listed in active markets. The Company does not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where the Company holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.

Level II—inputs to the valuation methodology are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date and are those other than quoted prices in active markets. The type of financial instruments in this category generally includes less liquid and restricted securities listed in active markets, securities traded in other than active markets, government and agency securities, and certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on observable inputs.

Level III—inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to overall fair value measurement. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Financial instruments that are in this category generally include investments in privately-held entities, collateralized loan obligations, and certain over-the-counter derivatives where the fair value is based on unobservable inputs.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. The Investment Adviser’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment.

Transfers between levels, if any, are recognized at the beginning of the year in which the transfers occur. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, there were no transfers between levels.

The following tables summarize the Company’s investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the above fair value hierarchy levels as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

   December 31, 2015 
   Level I   Level II   Level III��  Total 

Assets

      

First Lien Debt

  $—      $9,575   $785,459    $795,034  

Second Lien Debt

   —      —      210,396     210,396  

Structured Finance Obligations

   —      —      44,812     44,812  

Equity Investments

   —      —      2,424     2,424  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $—     $9,575   $1,043,091    $1,052,666  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   December 31, 2014 
   Level I   Level II   Level III   Total 

Assets

      

First Lien Debt

  $—     $9,575   $505,212    $514,787  

Second Lien Debt

   —      —      107,874     107,874  

Structured Finance Obligations

   —      —      76,001     76,001  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $—      $9,575    $689,087     $698,662  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
        

The changes in the Company’s investments at fair value for which the Company has used Level III inputs to determine fair value and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings for Level III investments still held are as follows:

   For the year ended December 31,2015 
   First Lien
Debt
  Second
Lien Debt
  Structured
Finance
Obligations
  Equity
Investments
   Total 

Balance, beginning of year

  $505,212   $107,874   $76,001   $—     $689,087  

Purchases

   472,342    113,195    10,059    2,215     597,811  

Sales

   (17,454)  —     (19,930)  —       (37,384)

Paydowns

   (174,427  (8,025  (10,155  —       (192,607

Accretion of discount

   2,677    277    20    —       2,974  

Net realized gains (losses)

   208   —     956   —       1,164 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

   (3,099  (2,925  (12,139  209     (17,954
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  $785,459   $210,396   $44,812   $2,424    $1,043,091  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings related to investments still held as of December 31, 2015 included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments non-controlled/non-affiliated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations

  $(4,423 $(2,838 $(12,219 $209    $(19,271
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

   For the year ended December 31, 2014 
   First Lien
Debt
  Second
Lien Debt
  Structured
Finance
Obligations
  Total 

Balance, beginning of year

  $141,676   $39,767   $31,364   $212,807  

Purchases

   442,328    79,993    82,613    604,934  

Sales

   —     (4,050  (7,258  (11,308

Paydowns

   (77,040  (5,571  (27,310  (109,921

Accretion of discount

   964    133    11    1,108  

Net realized gains (losses)

   —     120   (48  72  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

   (2,716  (2,518  (3,371  (8,605
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  $505,212   $107,874   $76,001   $689,087  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings related to investments still held as of December 31, 2014 included in net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments non-controlled/non-affiliated on the Consolidated Statements of Operations

  $(2,550 $(2,544 $(3,367 $(8,461
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Company generally uses the following framework when determining the fair value of investments that are categorized as Level III:

Investments in debt securities are initially evaluated to determine whether the enterprise value of the portfolio company is greater than the applicable debt. The enterprise value of the portfolio company is estimated using a market approach and an income approach. The market approach utilizes market value (EBITDA) multiples of publicly traded comparable companies and available precedent sales transactions of comparable companies. The Company carefully considers numerous factors when selecting the appropriate companies whose

multiples are used to value its portfolio companies. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type of organization, similarity to the business being valued, relevant risk factors, as well as size, profitability and growth expectations. The income approach typically uses a discounted cash flow analysis of the portfolio company.

Investments in debt securities that do not have sufficient coverage through the enterprise value analysis are valued based on an expected probability of default and discount recovery analysis.

Investments in debt securities with sufficient coverage through the enterprise value analysis are generally valued using a discounted cash flow analysis of the underlying security. Projected cash flows in the discounted cash flow typically represent the relevant security’s contractual interest, fees and principal payments plus the assumption of full principal recovery at the security’s expected maturity date. The discount rate to be used is determined using an average of two market-based methodologies. Investments in debt securities may also be valued using consensus pricing.

Investments in structured finance obligations are generally valued using a discounted cash flow and/or consensus pricing.

Investments in equities are generally valued using a market approach and/or an income approach. The market approach utilizes EBITDA multiples of publicly traded comparable companies and available precedent sales transactions of comparable companies. The income approach typically uses a discounted cash flow analysis of the portfolio company.

The following tables summarize the quantitative information related to the significant unobservable inputs for Level III instruments which are carried at fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

   Fair Value as
of December 31,

2015
   Valuation Techniques  Significant
Unobservable

Inputs
  Range  Weighted
Average
 
         Low  High  

Investments in First Lien Debt

  $618,172    Discounted Cash Flow  Discount Rate   5.57  13.37  8.19
   167,287    Consensus Pricing  Indicative Quotes   96.50    99.38    97.97  
  

 

 

         

Total First Lien Debt

   785,459          
  

 

 

         

Investments in Second Lien Debt

   161,907    Discounted Cash Flow  Discount Rate   9.37  15.44  10.56
   48,489    Consensus Pricing  Indicative Quotes   93.25   ��101.25    96.86  
  

 

 

         

Total Second Lien Debt

   210,396          
  

 

 

         

Investments in Structured Finance Obligations

   43,016    Discounted Cash Flow  Discount Rate   13.00  17.50  14.05
      Default Rate   0.19    1.56    1.09  
      Prepayment Rate   18.16    40.00    22.09  
      Recovery Rate   69.27    75.00    74.36  
   1,796    Consensus Pricing  Indicative Quotes   0.18    63.00    59.69  
  

 

 

         

Total Structured Finance Obligations

   44,812          
  

 

 

         

Investments in Equity

   2,424    Income Approach  Discount Rate   10.19  10.90  10.42
    Market Approach  Comparable
Multiple
   9.94x    11.09x    10.71x  
  

 

 

         

Total Equity Investments

   2,424          
  

 

 

         

Total Level III Investments

  $1,043,091          
  

 

 

         

   Fair Value as
of December 31,
2014
   Valuation Techniques  Significant
Unobservable

Inputs
  Range  Weighted
Average
 
         Low  High  

Investments in First Lien Debt

  $469,796    Discounted Cash Flow  Discount Rate   5.23  9.02  6.33
   35,416    Consensus Pricing  Indicative Quotes   98.50    99.33    98.71  
  

 

 

         

Total First Lien Debt

   505,212          
  

 

 

         

Investments in Second Lien Debt

   84,902    Discounted Cash Flow  Discount Rate   9.15  11.32  10.05
   22,972    Consensus Pricing  Indicative Quotes   98.13    101.00    99.03  
  

 

 

         

Total Second Lien Debt

   107,874          
  

 

 

         

Investments in Structured Finance Obligations

   59,533    Discounted Cash Flow  Discount Rate   12.65  15.80  13.87
      Default Rate   —      1.32    0.60  
      Prepayment Rate   18.78    32.50    25.41  
      Recovery Rate   67.54    75.00    73.28  
   16,468    Consensus Pricing  Indicative Quotes   0.18    81.00    77.28  
  

 

 

         

Total Structured Finance Obligations

   76,001          
  

 

 

         

Total Level III Investments

  $689,087          
  

 

 

         

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments in first and second lien debt securities are discount rates and indicative quotes. Significant increases in discount rates would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Significant decreases in indicative quotes in isolation may result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments in structured finance obligations are discount rates, default rates, prepayment rates, recovery rates and indicative quotes. Significant increases in discount rates, default rates or prepayment rates in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement, while a significant increase in recovery rates in isolation would result in a significantly higher fair value. Significant decreases in indicative quotes in isolation may result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s investments in equities are discount rates and comparable EBITDA multiples. Significant increases in discount rates would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Significant decreases in comparable EBITDA multiples would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

Financial instruments disclosed but not carried at fair value:

The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s secured borrowings disclosed but not carried at fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014 
   Carrying Value   Fair Value   Carrying Value   Fair Value 

Secured borrowings

  $234,313    $234,313    $308,441    $308,441  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $234,313    $234,313    $308,441    $308,441  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The carrying values of the secured borrowings approximate their respective fair values and are categorized as Level III within the hierarchy. Secured borrowings are valued generally using discounted cash flow analysis. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s secured borrowings are discount rates. Significant increases in discount rates would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

The following table represents the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s 2015-1 Notes disclosed but not carried at fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014 
   Carrying Value   Fair Value   Carrying Value   Fair Value 

Aaa/AAA Class A-1A Notes

  $160,000    $157,200    $—      $—    

Aaa/AAA Class A-1B Notes

   40,000     39,700     —       —    

Aaa/AAA Class A-1C Notes

   27,000     26,823     —       —    

Aa2 Class A-2 Notes

   46,000     45,122     —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $273,000    $268,845    $—      $—    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The fair value determination of the Company’s 2015-1 Notes was based on the market quotation(s) received from broker/dealer(s). These fair value measurements were based on significant inputs not observable and thus represent Level III measurements as defined in the accounting guidance for fair value measurement.

The carrying value of other financial assets and liabilities approximates their fair value based on the short term nature of these items.

4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Investment Advisory Agreement

On April 3, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the directors who are not “interested persons” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act (“Independent Directors”), approved an investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) between the Company and the Investment Adviser in accordance with, and on the basis of an evaluation satisfactory to such directors as required by, Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act. The initial term of the Investment Advisory Agreement is two years from April 3, 2013 and, unless terminated earlier, the Investment Advisory Agreement will renew automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the vote of the Board of Directors and by the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors. On March 10, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for a one year period. The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of an assignment and may be terminated by either party without penalty upon at least 60 days’ written notice to the other party. Subject to the overall supervision of the Board of Directors, the Investment Adviser provides investment advisory services to the Company. For providing these services, the Investment Adviser receives fees from the Company consisting of two components—a base management fee and an incentive fee.

Prior to a Qualified IPO, the base management fee is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears at an annual rate of 1.50% of the average daily gross assets of the Company for the period adjusted for share issuances or repurchases, excluding any cash and cash equivalents and including assets acquired with leverage from use of the Revolving Credit Facility, Facility and 2015-1 Notes (see Note 5, Borrowings, and Note 6, 2015-1 Notes). For purposes of this calculation, cash and cash equivalents include any temporary investments in cash-equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high quality investment grade debt investments that mature in 12 months or less from the date of investment. Base management fees for any partial quarter are prorated. The Investment Adviser contractually waived one-third (0.50%) of the base management fee prior to a Qualified IPO. The fee waiver will terminate if and when a Qualified IPO has been consummated.

The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. The second part is determined and payable in arrears based on capital gains as of the end of each calendar year.

Pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Company receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the operating expenses accrued for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the administration agreement, and any interest expense or fees on any credit facilities or outstanding debt and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with pay-in-kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.

Prior to any Qualified IPO of the Company’s common stock, pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the average daily Hurdle Calculation Value (as defined below) throughout the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a “hurdle rate” of 1.50% per quarter (6% annualized). “Hurdle Calculation Value” means, on any given day, the sum of (x) the value of net assets as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately preceding such day plus (y) the aggregate amount of capital drawn from investors (or reinvested in the Company pursuant to a dividend reinvestment plan) from the beginning of the current quarter to such day minus (z) the aggregate amount of distributions (including share repurchases) made by the Company from the beginning of the current quarter to such day but only to the extent such distributions were not declared and accounted for on the books and records in a previous quarter.

GMS Finance pays its Investment Adviser an incentive fee with respect to its pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:

no incentive fee based on pre-incentive fee net investment income in any calendar quarter in which its pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the hurdle of 1.50%;

100% of pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle but is less than 1.875% in any calendar quarter (7.50% annualized). The Company refers to this portion of the pre-incentive fee net investment income (which exceeds the hurdle but is less than 1.875%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” is meant to provide the Investment Adviser with approximately 20% of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a hurdle did not apply if this net investment income exceeds 1.875% in any calendar quarter; and

20% of the amount of pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 1.875% in any calendar quarter (7.50% annualized) will be payable to the Investment Adviser. This reflects that once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved, 20% of all pre-incentive fee investment income thereafter is allocated to the Investment Adviser.

The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20% of realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the date of determination, computed net of all realized capital losses on a cumulative basis and unrealized capital depreciation, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees, provided that, the incentive fee determined at the end of the first calendar year of operations may be calculated for a period of shorter than twelve calendar months to take into account any realized capital gains computed net of all realized capital losses on a cumulative basis and unrealized capital depreciation.

The Company will defer payment of any incentive fee otherwise earned by the Investment Adviser if, during the most recent four full calendar quarter periods (or, if less, the number of full calendar quarters completed since the initial drawdown of capital from the stockholders, “Initial Drawdown”) ending on or prior to the date such payment is to be made, the sum of (a) the aggregate distributions to stockholders and (b) the change in net assets (defined as gross assets less indebtedness and before taking into account any incentive fees payable during the period) is less than 6.0% of net assets (defined as gross assets less indebtedness) at the beginning of such period, provided, that such percentage will be appropriately prorated during the four full calendar quarters immediately following the Initial Drawdown. These calculations are adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases. Any deferred incentive fees are carried over for payment in subsequent calculation periods. The Investment Adviser may earn an incentive fee under the Investment Advisory Agreement on the Company’s repurchase of debt issued by the Company at a gain.

Prior to a Qualified IPO, from time to time, CGMSIM intends to pay certain individuals providing services to CGMSIM, including members of the CGMSIM Investment Team, in shares of our common stock and/or in cash a portion of the net after-tax incentive fees that CGMSIM receives from us (not to exceed 25%) in consideration of their services on behalf of CGMSIM. To the extent that any such payment is in shares of our common stock, CGMSIM will purchase such shares from us and distribute the shares to the individuals eligible for such payment, and, to the extent that any such payment is in cash, CGMSIM will require the individuals eligible for such payment to make capital commitments to purchase newly issued shares of our common stock. In addition, following the completion of a Qualified IPO, from time to time, CGMSIM intends to purchase shares of our common stock in the open market at a purchase price, in the aggregate, equal to approximately 25% of each installment of the net after-tax incentive fees that CGMSIM receives from us, subject to market conditions. CGMSIM may then distribute those shares to members of the CGMSIM Investment Team and other individuals eligible for such payment in consideration of their services on behalf of CGMSIM.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, base management fees were $8,907, $4,373 and $625, respectively (net of waiver of $4,454, $2,186 and $312, respectively), incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net investment income were $8,881, $3,578 and $0, respectively, and there were no incentive fees related to realized capital gains. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were no accrued capital gains incentive fees based upon the cumulative net realized and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The accrual for any capital gains incentive fee under US GAAP in a given period may result in an additional expense if such cumulative amount is greater than in the prior period or a reduction of previously recorded expense if such cumulative amount is less than in the prior period. If such cumulative amount is negative, then there is no accrual.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $5,277 and $6,319, respectively, was included in base management and incentive fees payable in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

On April 3, 2013, the Investment Adviser entered into a personnel agreement with The Carlyle Group Employee Co., L.L.C. (“Carlyle Employee Co.”), an affiliate of the Investment Adviser, pursuant to which Carlyle Employee Co. provides the Investment Adviser with access to investment professionals.

Administration Agreement

On April 3, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) between the Company and the Administrator. Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, the Administrator provides services and receives reimbursements equal to an amount that reimburses the Administrator for its costs and expenses and the Company’s allocable portion of overhead incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including the Company’s allocable portion of the compensation paid to or compensatory distributions received by the Company’s officers (including the Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer) and respective staff who provide services

to the Company, operations staff who provide services to the Company, and any internal audit staff, to the extent internal audit performs a role in the Company’s Sarbanes-Oxley Act internal control assessment. Reimbursement under the Administration Agreement occurs quarterly in arrears.

The initial term of the Administration Agreement is two years from April 3, 2013 and, unless terminated earlier, the Administration Agreement will renew automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board of Directors or by a majority vote of the outstanding voting securities of the Company and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors. On March 10, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved the continuance of the Administration Agreement for a one year period. The Administration Agreement may not be assigned by a party without the consent of the other party and may be terminated by either party without penalty upon at least 60 days’ written notice to the other party.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, GMS Finance incurred $595, $626 and $650, respectively, in fees under the Administrative Agreement, which were included in administrative service fees in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $97 and $91, respectively, was unpaid and included in administrative service fees payable in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities

Sub-Administration Agreements

On April 3, 2013, the Administrator entered into sub-administration agreements with Carlyle Employee Co. and CELF Advisors LLP. Pursuant to the agreements, Carlyle Employee Co. and CELF Advisors LLP provide the Administrator with access to personnel.

On April 3, 2013, the Administrator entered into a sub-administration agreement with State Street Bank and Trust Company (as amended, the “Sub-Administration Agreement”). On March 11, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved an amendment to the Sub-Administration Agreement. The initial term of the Sub-Administration Agreement ends on April 1, 2017 and, unless terminated earlier, the Sub-Administration Agreement will renew automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board of Directors or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Company’s Independent Directors. The Sub-Administration Agreement may be terminated upon at least 60 days’ written notice and without penalty by the vote of a majority of the outstanding securities of the Company, or by the vote of the Board of Directors or by either party to the Sub-Administration Agreement.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, fees incurred in connection with the Sub-Administration Agreement, which amounted to $486, $222 and $50, respectively, were included in other general and administrative in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $138 and $80, respectively, was unpaid and included in other accrued expenses and liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

Placement Fees

On April 3, 2013, the Company entered into a placement fee arrangement with TCG Securities, L.L.C. (“TCG”), a licensed broker-dealer and an affiliate of the Investment Adviser, which may require stockholders to pay a placement fee to TCG for TCG’s services.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, TCG earned placement fees of $6, $1 and $0, respectively, from GMS Finance stockholders in connection with the issuance or sale of the Company’s common stock.

Board of Directors

GMS Finance’s Board of Directors currently consists of seven members, four of whom are Independent Directors. On April 3, 2013, the Board of Directors also established an Audit Committee consisting of its Independent Directors, and may establish additional committees in the future. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, GMS Finance incurred $419, $395 and $322, respectively, in fees and expenses associated with its Independent Directors and Audit Committee. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $0 and $5, respectively, was unpaid and included in other accrued expenses and liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, certain current directors had committed $1,541 and $1,500, respectively, in capital commitments to the Company.

5. BORROWINGS

In accordance with the Investment Company Act, the Company is only allowed to borrow amounts such that its asset coverage, as defined in the Investment Company Act, is at least 200% after such borrowing. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, asset coverage was 212.70%234.86% and 209.67%209.97%, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, there were secured borrowings of $402,200, $420,023$816,216, $566,351 and $66,822,$402,200, respectively, under the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility and Credit Facility and repayments of $476,328, $178,404$675,208, $378,779 and $0,$476,328, respectively, under the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility and Credit Facility. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, there were $234,313$562,893 and $308,441,$421,885, respectively, in secured borrowings outstanding.

Revolving

SPV Credit Facility

The Borrower SubSPV closed on May 24, 2013 on the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility, which was subsequently amended on June 30, 2014, (the “First Amendment”) and further amended on June 19, 2015. Advances under the Revolving Credit Facility first became available once the Borrower Sub held at least $30,000 of minimum equity in its assets.2015, June 9, 2016 and May 26, 2017. The RevolvingSPV Credit Facility provides for secured borrowings during the applicable revolving period up to an amount equal to the lesser of $400,000 the(the borrowing base as calculated pursuant to the terms of the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility,Facility) and the amount of net cash proceeds and unpledged capital commitments the Company has received, with an accordion feature that can, subject to certain conditions, increase the aggregate maximum credit commitment up to an amount not to exceed $750,000, subject to restrictions imposed on borrowings under the Investment Company Act and certain restrictions and conditions set forth in the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility, including adequate collateral to support such borrowings. The RevolvingSPV Credit Facility has a revolving period through May 24, 201822, 2020 and a maturity date of May 22, 2021.23, 2022. Borrowings under the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility bear interest initially at the applicable commercial paper rate (if the lender is a conduit lender) or LIBOR (or, if applicable, a rate based on the prime rate or federal funds rate) plus 1.90%2.00% per year through May 23, 2018, with a pre-determined future interest rate increase of 0.50% during the final two years of the revolving period withand pre-determined future interest rate increases of 1.00%-1.85%0.875%-1.75% over the threetwo years following the end of the revolving period. The Borrower SubSPV is also required to pay an undrawn commitment fee of between 0.25%0.50% and 0.75% per year depending on the usage ofdrawings under the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility. Payments under the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility are made quarterly. The lenders have a first lien security interest on substantially all of the assets of the Borrower Sub.

SPV.

As part of the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility, the Borrower SubSPV is subject to limitations as to how borrowed funds may be used and the types of loans that are eligible to be acquired by the Borrower SubSPV including, but not limited to, restrictions on sector and geographic concentrations, loan size, payment frequency, tenor and minimum investment ratings (or estimated ratings). In addition, borrowed funds are intended to be used primarily to purchase first lien loan assets, and the Borrower SubSPV is limited in its ability to purchase certain other assets (including, but not limited to, second lien loans, covenant-lite loans, revolving and delayed draw loans and discount loans) and other assets are not permitted to be purchased (including, but not limited to paid-in-kind loans and structured finance obligations). The RevolvingSPV Credit Facility has certain requirements relating to interest coverage, collateral quality and portfolio performance, including limitations on delinquencies and charge offs, certain violations of which could result in the immediate acceleration of the amounts due under the RevolvingSPV Credit

Facility. The RevolvingSPV Credit Facility is also subject to a borrowing base that applies different advance rates to assets held by the Borrower SubSPV based generally on the fair market value of



such assets. Under certain circumstances as set forth in the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility, the Company could be obliged to repurchase loans from the Borrower Sub.

Related to the First Amendment, which reduced the maximum commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility, $827 of deferred financing costs (representing the prorated financing costs related to the reduction in commitments) were immediately expensed on June 30, 2014 in lieu of continuing to amortize over the term of the Revolving Credit Facility.

SPV.

As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Borrower SubSPV was in compliance with all covenants and other requirements of the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility.

Credit Facility

The Company closed on March 21, 2014 on the Credit Facility, which was subsequently amended on January 8, 2015.2015, May 25, 2016 and March 22, 2017. The maximum principal amount of the Credit Facility is $150,000,$413,000, subject to availability under the Credit Facility, which is based on certain advance rates multiplied by the value of the Company’s portfolio investments (subject to certain concentration limitations) net of certain other indebtedness that the Company may incur in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility. Proceeds of the Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of portfolio investments. Maximum capacity under the Credit Facility may be increased to $225,000$550,000 through the exercise by the Company of an uncommitted accordion feature through which existing and new lenders may, at their option, agree to provide additional financing. The Credit Facility includes a $20,000 limit for swingline loans and a $5,000 limit for letters of credit. The Company may borrow amounts in U.S. dollars or certain other permitted currencies. Amounts drawn under the Credit Facility, including amounts drawn in respect of letters of credit, will bear interest at either LIBOR plus an applicable spread of 2.25%, or an “alternative base rate” (which is the highest of a prime rate, the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, or one month LIBOR plus 1.00%) plus an applicable spread of 1.25%. The Company may elect either the LIBOR or the “alternative base rate” at the time of drawdown, and loans may be converted from one rate to another at any time, subject to certain conditions. The Company also pays a fee of 0.375% on undrawn amounts under the Credit Facility and, in respect of each undrawn letter of credit, a fee and interest rate equal to the then-applicable margin under the Credit Facility while the letter of credit is outstanding. The availability period under the Credit Facility will terminate on March 21, 20182021 and the Credit Facility will mature on March 21, 2019.2022. During the period from March 21, 20182021 to March 21, 2019,2022, the Company will be obligated to make mandatory prepayments under the Credit Facility out of the proceeds of certain asset sales, other recovery events and equity and debt issuances.

Subject to certain exceptions, the Credit Facility is secured by a first lien security interest in substantially all of the portfolio investments held by the Company and the Company’s unfunded investor equity capital commitments (provided that the amount of unfunded capital commitments ultimately available to the lenders is limited to $100,000).Company. The pledge of unfunded investor equity capital commitments was subject to release once $100,000 of incremental capital had been called and received by the Company subsequent to January 8, 2015. Such capital call commitment had not been satisfied as of December 31, 2014. The pledge of unfunded investor equity capital commitments had been released as of December 31, 2015. TheCredit Facility includes customary covenants, including certain financial covenants related to asset coverage, shareholders’ equity and liquidity, certain limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens, and other maintenance covenants, as well as usual and customary events of default for senior secured revolving credit facilities of this nature.

As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and other requirements of the Credit Facility.

Summary of Facilities

The facilities of the Company and the Borrower SubFacilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014:

   December 31, 2015 
   Total
Facility
   Borrowings
Outstanding
   Unused Portion (1)   Amount
Available (2)
 

Revolving Credit Facility

  $400,000    $170,313    $229,687    $3,155  

Facility

   150,000     64,000     86,000     86,000  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $550,000    $234,313    $315,687    $89,155  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   December 31, 2014 
   Total
Facility
   Borrowings
Outstanding
   Unused Portion (1)   Amount
Available (2)
 

Revolving Credit Facility

  $400,000    $246,441    $153,559    $10,557  

Facility

   150,000     62,000     88,000     58,623  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $550,000    $308,441    $241,559    $69,180  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2016:
 December 31, 2017
 
Total
Facility
 
Borrowings
Outstanding
 Unused Portion (1) 
Amount
Available (2)
SPV Credit Facility$400,000
 $287,393
 $112,607
 $27,147
Credit Facility413,000
 275,500
 137,500
 137,500
Total$813,000
 $562,893
 $250,107
 $164,647
 December 31, 2016
 
Total
Facility
 
Borrowings
Outstanding
 Unused Portion (1) 
Amount
Available (2)
SPV Credit Facility$400,000
 $252,885
 $147,115
 $5,988
Credit Facility220,000
 169,000
 51,000
 51,000
Total$620,000
 $421,885
 $198,115
 $56,988
(1)The unused portion is the amount upon which commitment fees are based.
(2)Available for borrowing based on the computation of collateral to support the borrowings.borrowings and subject to compliance with applicable covenants and financial ratios.



As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014, $9662016, $3,140 and $1,025,$1,667, respectively, of interest expense, $141$186 and $139,$203, respectively, of unused commitment fees and $22$23 and $28,$23, respectively, of other fees were included in interest and credit facility fees payable. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015, and 2014, the weighted average interest rate was 2.23%3.31%, 2.73% and 2.18%2.23%, respectively, and average principal debt outstanding was $455,144, $307,734 and $265,277, and $164,980, respectively. For the period from August 8, 2013 (initial date the Company borrowed under the Revolving Credit Facility) throughAs of December 31, 2013,2017 and 2016, the weighted average interest rate was 1.98%3.56% and average principal debt outstanding was $44,063. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the interest rate was 2.37%, 2.17% and 1.97%2.92%, respectively, based on floating LIBOR rates.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, the components of interest expense and credit facility fees were as follows:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Interest expense

  $9,582    $3,648    $353  

Facility unused commitment fee

   847     1,129     602  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   945     1,820     513  

Other fees

   106     103     49  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense and credit facility fees

  $11,480    $6,700    $1,517  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest expense

  $8,083    $2,882    $94  

For the year ended December 31, 2014, $827 of the amortization of deferred financing costs represents the prorated financing costs that were immediately expensed in lieu of continuing to amortize over the term of the Revolving Credit Facility related to the First Amendment which reduced the maximum commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility.

6.

 For the years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Interest expense$15,296
 $8,559
 $6,008
Facility unused commitment fee1,117
 1,253
 847
Amortization of deferred financing costs745
 1,213
 945
Other fees121
 107
 106
Total interest expense and credit facility fees$17,279
 $11,132
 $7,906
Cash paid for interest expense$13,806
 $7,828
 $6,062
7. 2015-1 Notes

On June 26, 2015, the Company completed the 2015-1 Debt Securitization. The 2015-1 Notes were issued by the 2015-1 Issuer, a wholly-ownedwholly owned and consolidated subsidiary of the Company, and are secured by a

diversified portfolio of the 2015-1 Issuer consisting primarily of first and second lien senior secured loans. The 2015-1 Debt Securitization was executed through a private placement of the 2015-1 Notes, consisting of $160 million$160,000 of Aaa/AAA Class A-1A Notes which bear interest at the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.85%; $40 million$40,000 of Aaa/AAA Class A-1B Notes which bear interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 1.75% for the first 24 months and the three-month LIBOR plus 2.05% thereafter; $27 million$27,000 of Aaa/AAA Class A-1C Notes which bear interest at 3.75%; and $46 million$46,000 of Aa2 Class A-2 Notes which bear interest at the three-monththree month LIBOR plus 2.70%. The 2015-1 Notes were issued at par and are scheduled to mature on July 15, 2027. The Company received 100% of the preferred interests (the “Preferred Interests”) issued by the 2015-1 Issuer (the “2015-1 Issuer Preferred Interests”) on the closing date of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization in exchange for the Company’s contribution to the 2015-1 Issuer of the initial closing date loan portfolio. The 2015-1 Issuer Preferred Interests do not bear interest and had a nominal value of $125.9 million$125,900 at closing. In connection with the contribution, the Company made customary representations, warranties and covenants to the 2015-1 Issuer in the purchase agreement. The Class A-1A, Class A-1B and Class A-1C and Class A-2 Notes are included in the December 31, 2015these consolidated financial statements. The 2015-1 Issuer Preferred Interests were eliminated in consolidation.

On the closing date of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, the 2015-1 Issuer effected a one-time distribution to the Company of a substantial portion of the proceeds of the private placement of the 2015-1 Notes, net of expenses, which distribution was used to repay a portion of the certain amounts outstanding under the RevolvingSPV Credit Facility and the Credit Facility. As part of the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, certain first and second lien senior secured loans were distributed by the Borrower SubSPV to the Company pursuant to a distribution and contribution agreement. The Company contributed the loans that comprised the initial closing date loan portfolio (including the loans distributed to the Company from the Borrower Sub)SPV) to the 2015-1 Issuer pursuant to a contribution agreement. Future loansloan transfers from the Company to the 2015-1 Issuer will be made pursuant to a sale agreement and are subject to the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors. Assets of the 2015-1 Issuer are not available to the creditors of the Borrower SubSPV or the Company. In connection with the issuance and sale of the 2015-1 Notes, the Company made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the purchase agreement.

During the reinvestment period, pursuant to the indenture governing the 2015-1 Notes, all principal collections received on the underlying collateral may be used by the 2015-1 Issuer to purchase new collateral under the direction of Investment Adviser in its capacity as collateral manager of the 2015-1 Issuer and in accordance with the Company’s investment strategy.

The Investment Adviser serves as collateral manager to the 2015-1 Issuer under a collateral management agreement (the “Collateral Management Agreement”). Pursuant to the Collateral Management Agreement, the 2015-1 Issuer pays management fees (comprised of base management fees, subordinated management fees and incentive management fees) (“Management Fees”) to the Investment Adviser for rendering collateral management services. As per the Collateral Management Agreement, for the period the Company retains all of the 2015-1 Issuer Preferred Interests, the Investment Adviser does not earn Management Feesmanagement fees for


providing such collateral management services. The Company currently retains all of the 2015-1 Issuer Preferred Interests, thus there were nothe Investment Adviser did not earn any management fees earned from the 2015-1 Issuer for the year ended December 31, 2015.

2017. Any such waived fees may not be recaptured by the Investment Adviser.

Pursuant to an undertaking by the Company in connection with the 2015-1 Debt Securitization, the Company has agreed to hold on an ongoing basis the 2015-1 Issuer Preferred Interests with an aggregate dollar purchase price at least equal to 5% of the aggregate outstanding amount of all collateral obligations by the 2015-1 Issuer for so long as any securities of the 2015-1 Issuer remain outstanding. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company was in compliance with its undertaking.

The 2015-1 Issuer pays ongoing administrative expenses to the trustee, independent accountants, legal counsel, rating agencies and independent managers in connection with developing and maintaining reports, and providing required services in connection with the administration of the 2015-1 Issuer.

As of December 31, 2015,2017, there were 5761 first lien and second lien senior secured loans with a total fair value of approximately $384,272$394,162 and cash of $1,291 securing the 2015-1 Notes. The pool of loans in the securitization must meet certain requirements, including asset mix and concentration, term, agency rating, collateral coverage, minimum coupon, minimum spread and sector diversity requirements as perin the offering document ofindenture governing the 2015-1 Issuer.

Notes.

For the yearyears ended December 31, 2015,2017 and 2016, the effective annualized weighted average interest rate, which includes amortization of debt issuance costs on the 2015-1 Notes, was 2.45%3.33% and 2.89%, respectively, based on floating LIBOR rates.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $2,003 and $1,706, respectively, of interest expense was included in interest and credit facility fees payable. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 2013,2015, the components of interest expense on the 2015-1 Notes were as follows:

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Interest expense

  $3,468    $—     $—   

Amortization of deferred financing costs

   106     —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense and credit facility fees

  $3,574    $—      $—    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest expense

  $2,021    $—      $—    

7.

 For the years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Interest expense$9,010
 $7,698
 $3,468
Amortization of deferred financing costs204
 205
 106
Total interest expense and credit facility fees$9,214
 $7,903
 $3,574
Cash paid for interest expense$8,713
 $7,439
 $2,021
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

A summary of significant contractual payment obligations was as follows as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014:

   Revolving Credit Facility and Facility   2015-1 Notes 

Payment Due by Period

  December 31,
2015
   December 31,
2014
   December 31,
2015
   December 31,
2014
 

Less than 1 Year

  $—     $—     $—     $—   

1-3 Years

   —      —      —      —   

3-5 Years

   64,000     62,000     —      —    

More than 5 Years

   170,313     246,441     273,000     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $234,313    $308,441    $273,000    $—    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2016:

 SPV Credit Facility and Credit Facility 2015-1 Notes
Payment Due by PeriodDecember 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 December 31, 2017 December 31,
2016
Less than 1 Year$
 $
 $
 $
1-3 Years
 
 
 
3-5 Years562,893
 421,885
 
 
More than 5 Years
 
 273,000
 273,000
Total$562,893
 $421,885
 $273,000
 $273,000

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company enters into contracts or agreements that contain indemnification or warranties. Future events could occur that lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. The Company believes that the likelihood of such an event is remote; however, the maximum potential exposure is unknown. No accrual has been made in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20152017 and 20142016 for any such exposure.

As

Upon the completion of December 31, 2015 and 2014,the IPO, uncalled capital commitments payable to the Company had $1,174,340 and $1,129,522, respectively, in total capital commitments from stockholders, of which $559,214 and $776,750, respectively, was unfunded. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, certain current directors had committed $1,541 and $1,500, respectively, in capital commitmentsby the Company’s pre-IPO investors were automatically reduced to the Company.

zero.



The Company had the following unfunded commitments to fund delayed draw and revolving senior secured loans as of the indicated dates:

   Par Value as of 
   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2014 

Unfunded delayed draw commitments

  $20,695    $9,500  

Unfunded revolving term loan commitments

   3,906     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total unfunded commitments

  $24,601    $9,500  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

8.

 Par Value as of
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Unfunded delayed draw commitments$39,383
 $35,704
Unfunded revolving term loan commitments78,991
 24,063
Total unfunded commitments$118,374
 $59,767
9. NET ASSETS

The Company has the authority to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 per share par value.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 20,505,285 shares for $373,700 including the reinvestment of dividends. In connection with the NFIC Acquisition, the Company issued 434,233 shares of common stock valued at approximately $8,046. See Note 14 for additional information regarding the NFIC Acquisition. In connection with the Company’s IPO, the Company issued 9,454,200 shares of common stock (including shares issued pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) at a public offering price of $18.50 per share. Net of underwriting costs, the Company received cash proceeds of $169,488. The following table summarizes capital activity during the year ended December 31, 2017:
 Common Stock Capital in Excess of Par Value Offering Costs Accumulated Net Investment Income (Loss) Accumulated Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments Accumulated Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments Total Net Assets
Shares Amount 
Balance, beginning of year41,702,318
 $417
 $799,580
 $(74) $(3,207) $(25,357) $(7,222) $764,137
Common stock issued20,146,561
 201
 366,818
 
 
 
 
 367,019
Reinvestment of dividends358,724
 4
 6,677
 
 
 
 
 6,681
Offering costs
 
 
 (1,544) 
 
 
 (1,544)
Net investment income (loss)
 
 
 
 92,151
 
 
 92,151
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
 
 
 
 
 (11,692) 
 (11,692)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
 
 
 
 
 
 3,741
 3,741
Dividends declared
 
 
 
 (93,189) 
 
 (93,189)
Tax reclassification of stockholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP
 
 (268) 
 6,767
 (6,499) 
 
Balance, end of year62,207,603
 $622
 $1,172,807
 $(1,618) $2,522
 $(43,548) $(3,481) $1,127,304

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 10,178,235 shares for $185,816 including reinvestment of dividends. The following table summarizes capital activity during the year ended December 31, 2016:
 Common Stock Capital in Excess of Par Value Offering Costs Accumulated Net Investment Income (Loss) Accumulated Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments Accumulated Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments Total Net Assets
Shares Amount 
Balance, beginning of year31,524,083
 $315
 $613,944
 $(74) $(12,994) $(2,411) $(27,054) $571,726
Common stock issued10,162,898
 102
 185,435
 
 
 
 
 185,537
Reinvestment of dividends15,337
 
 279
 
 
 
 
 279
Net investment income (loss)
 
 
 
 59,621
 
 
 59,621
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
 
 
 
 
 (9,644) 
 (9,644)
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
 
 
 
 
 
 19,832
 19,832
Dividends declared
 
 
 
 (63,214) 
 
 (63,214)
Tax reclassification of stockholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP
 
 (78) 
 13,380
 (13,302) 
 
Balance, end of year41,702,318
 $417
 $799,580
 $(74) $(3,207) $(25,357) $(7,222) $764,137


During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 13,591,386 shares for $262,485 including reinvestment of dividends. The following table summarizes capital activity during the year ended December 31, 2015:

  Common Stock  Capital
in Excess
of Par
Value
  Offering
Costs
  Accumulated
Net Investment
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Net Realized

Gain (Loss)
on Investments
  Accumulated Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation) on
Investments
  Total
Net
Assets
 
 Shares  Amount       

Balance, beginning of year

  17,932,697   $179   $351,636   $(74) $(4,388 $(57) $(9,039 $338,257  

Common stock issued

  13,584,508    136    262,218    —      —      —     —     262,354  

Reinvestment of dividends

  6,878    —      131    —     —     —     —     131  

Net investment income (loss)

  —     —     —     —     35,524    —     —     35,524  

Net realized gain (loss) on investments—non-controlled/ non-affiliated

  —     —     —     —     —      1,164    —     1,164  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/ non-affiliated

  —     —     —     —      —      —     (18,015  (18,015

Dividends declared

  —     —     —      —     (47,689  —     —     (47,689

Tax reclassification of stockholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP

  —     —     (41)  —     3,559   (3,518)  —     —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  31,524,083   $315   $613,944   $(74) $(12,994 $(2,411 $(27,054 $571,726  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 8,356,707 shares for $164,803 including reinvestment of dividends. The following table summarizes capital activity during the year ended December 31, 2014:

  Common Stock  Capital
in Excess
of Par
Value
  Offering
Costs
  Accumulated
Net Investment
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Net Realized

Gain (Loss)
on Investments
  Accumulated Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation) on
Investments
  Total
Net
Assets
 
 Shares  Amount       

Balance, beginning of year

  9,575,990   $96   $186,965   $(74) $(664 $—    $(321) $186,002  

Common stock issued

  8,354,987    83    164,686    —      —      —     —     164,769  

Reinvestment of dividends

  1,720    —     34    —      —      —     —     34  

Net investment income (loss)

  —     —     —     —      14,260    —     —     14,260  

Net realized gain (loss) on investments—non-controlled/ non-affiliated

  —     —     —     —     —     72    —     72  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/ non-affiliated

  —     —     —     —     —     —     (8,718  (8,718

Dividends declared

  —     —     —     —      (18,162  —     —     (18,162

Tax reclassification of stockholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP

  —     —     (49  —     178    (129)  —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  17,932,697   $179   $351,636   $(74) $(4,388 $(57) $(9,039 $338,257  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued 9,575,890 shares for $188,001. The following table summarizes capital activity during the year ended December 31, 2013:

  Common Stock  Capital
in Excess
of Par
Value
  Offering
Costs
  Accumulated
Net Investment
Income (Loss)
  Accumulated
Net Realized

Gain (Loss)
on Investments
  Accumulated Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation) on
Investments
  Total
Net
Assets
 
 Shares  Amount       

Balance, beginning of year

  100   $—    $2   $—    $—    $—    $—    $2  

Common stock issued

  9,575,890    96    187,905    —     —     —     —     188,001  

Offering costs

  —     —     —     (74  —     —     —     (74

Net investment income (loss)

  —     —     —     —     (1,669  —     —     (1,669

Net realized gain (loss) on investments—non-controlled/ non-affiliated

  —     —     —     —     —     63    —     63  

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/ non-affiliated

  —     —     —     —     —     —     (321  (321

Tax reclassification of stockholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP

  —     —     (942  —     1,005    (63  —     —   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

  9,575,990   $96   $186,965   $(74 $(664 $—    $(321 $186,002  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 Common Stock Capital in Excess of Par Value Offering Costs Accumulated Net Investment Income (Loss) Accumulated Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Investments Accumulated Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Investments Total Net Assets
Shares Amount 
Balance, beginning of year17,932,697
 $179
 $351,636
 $(74) $(4,388) $(57) $(9,039) $338,257
Common stock issued13,584,508
 136
 262,218
 
 
 
 
 262,354
Reinvestment of dividends6,878
 
 131
 
 
 
 
 131
Net investment income (loss)
 
 
 
 35,524
 
 
 35,524
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
 
 
 
 
 1,164
 
 1,164
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
 
 
 
 
 
 (18,015) (18,015)
Dividends declared
 
 
 
 (47,689) 
 
 (47,689)
Tax reclassification of stockholders’ equity in accordance with US GAAP
 
 (41) 
 3,559
 (3,518) 
 
Balance, end of year31,524,083
 $315
 $613,944
 $(74) $(12,994) $(2,411) $(27,054) $571,726

The following table summarizes total shares issued and proceeds received related to capital drawdowns delivered pursuant to subscriptions for the Company’s common stock and reinvestment of dividendsactivity during the year ended December 31, 2015:

   Shares Issued   Proceeds Received 

January 16, 2015

   924,977    $18,000  

January 26, 2015**

   1,051     20  

February 26, 2015

   2,312,659     45,005  

April 21, 2015**

   1,351     25  

May 1, 2015

   1,462,746     28,085  

May 22, 2015

   1,708,068     33,000  

June 25, 2015

   2,412,386     46,992  

July 22, 2015**

   2,018     38  

August 21, 2015

   1,032,504     20,002  

September 30, 2015

   104,954     2,009  

October 9, 2015

   1,255,914     24,038  

October 22,2015**

   2,458     47  

December 21, 2015

   2,370,300     45,224  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   13,591,386    $262,485  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

*2017:

 Shares Issued Proceeds Received
January 24, 2017*5,837
 $108
April 24, 2017*5,133
 94
May 19, 20172,141,417
 39,488
June 9, 20178,116,711
 149,997
June 9, 2017**434,233
 8,046
June 19, 20179,000,000
 161,505
July 5, 2017454,200
 7,983
October 18, 2017*347,754
 6,479
Total20,505,285
 $373,700
* Represents shares issued upon the reinvestment of dividends

dividends.

** Represents shares issued in accordance with the elections of the NFIC stockholders pursuant to the NFIC Acquisition (see Note 14, NFIC Acquisition)
The following table summarizes total shares issued and proceeds received related to capital drawdowns delivered pursuant to subscriptions for the Company’s common stock and reinvestment of dividendsactivity during the year ended December 31, 2014:

   Shares Issued   Proceeds Received 

January 27, 2014

   1,020,810    $19,998  

February 21, 2014

   491,849     9,689  

March 21, 2014

   1,802,772     35,785  

April 14, 2014**

   148     3  

July 14, 2014**

   586     12  

September 17, 2014

   643,060     12,790  

October 9, 2014**

   986     19  

October 16, 2014

   1,134,723     22,502  

November 3, 2014

   1,008,570     20,000  

December 9, 2014

   2,253,203     44,005  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   8,356,707    $164,803  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

*2016:

 Shares Issued Proceeds Received
January 22, 2016*3,885
 $74
March 11, 20161,815,181
 33,000
April 22, 2016*2,988
 54
May 6, 20161,510,859
 26,999
June 24, 20161,660,333
 30,102
July 22, 2016*3,756
 66
August 26, 20161,909,449
 35,000
September 16, 20161,360,948
 25,001
October 24, 2016*4,708
 85
November 18, 20161,906,128
 35,435
Total10,178,235
 $185,816


* Represents shares issued upon the reinvestment of dividends

dividends.

The following table summarizes total shares issued and proceeds received related to capital drawdowns delivered pursuant to subscriptions for the Company’s common stockactivity during the year ended December 31, 2013:

   Shares Issued   Proceeds Received 

June 5, 2013

   555,352    $11,107  

June 10, 2013

   371,918     7,438  

June 25, 2013

   1,100,000     22,000  

July 31, 2013

   750,000     15,000  

August 22, 2013

   2,569,373     50,000  

September 23, 2013

   1,130,526     22,000  

November 4, 2013

   899,155     17,498  

November 26, 2013

   2,199,566     42,958  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   9,575,890    $188,001  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subscribed but unissued2015:

 Shares Issued Proceeds Received
January 16, 2015924,977
 $18,000
January 26, 2015*1,051
 20
February 26, 20152,312,659
 45,005
April 21, 2015*1,351
 25
May 1, 20151,462,746
 28,085
May 22, 20151,708,068
 33,000
June 25, 20152,412,386
 46,992
July 22, 2015*2,018
 38
August 21, 20151,032,504
 20,002
September 30, 2015104,954
 2,009
October 9, 20151,255,914
 24,038
October 22, 2015*2,458
 47
December 21, 20152,370,300
 45,224
Total13,591,386
 $262,485
* Represents shares are presented in equity with a deductionissued upon the reinvestment of subscriptions receivable until cash is received for a subscription. There were no subscribed but unissued shares as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

dividends.

Subscription transactions during the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 were executed at an offering price atthat represented a premium to net asset value due to the requirement to use prior quarter net asset value as the offering price unless it would result in the Company selling shares of its common stock at a price below the current net asset value and also in order to effect a reallocation of organizational costs to subsequent investors. SuchAdditionally, on June 19, 2017, the Company closed its IPO, issuing 9,454,200 shares of its common stock (including the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option on July 5, 2017) at a public offering price of $18.50 per share. Net of underwriting costs, the common stock issued in the IPO and net asset value experienced dilution during the period, and such subscription and IPO transactions increasedincreased/(decreased) net asset value by $0.11$(0.11) per share, $0.09$0.01 per share, and $0.32$0.11 per share, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company computes earnings per common share in accordance with ASC 260,Earnings Per Share.Basic earnings per common share were calculated by dividing net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations attributable to the Company by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the year.

Basic and diluted earnings per common share were as follows:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2015   2014   2013 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

  $18,673    $5,614    $(1,927

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

   24,830,200     13,091,544     3,016,298  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per common share

  $0.75    $0.43    $(0.64
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 For the years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations$84,200
 $69,809
 $18,673
Weighted-average common shares outstanding52,997,450
 36,152,390
 24,830,200
Basic and diluted earnings per common share$1.59
 $1.93
 $0.75


The following table summarizes the Company’s dividends declared and payable since inception throughduring the year ended December 31, 2015:

Date Declared

  

Record Date

  

Payment Date

  Per Share
Amount
  Total
Amount
 

March 13, 2014

  March 31, 2014  April 14, 2014  $0.19   $2,449  

June 26, 2014

  June 30, 2014  July 14, 2014  $0.27   $3,481  

September 12, 2014

  September 18, 2014  October 9, 2014  $0.44   $5,956  

December 19, 2014

  December 29, 2014  January 26, 2015  $0.35   $6,276  

March 11, 2015

  March 13, 2015  April 17, 2015  $0.37   $7,833  

June 24, 2015

  June 30, 2015  July 22, 2015  $0.37   $9,902  

September 24, 2015

  September 24, 2015  October 22, 2015  $0.42   $11,670  

December 29, 2015

  December 29, 2015  January 22, 2016  $0.40   $12,610  

December 29, 2015

  December 29, 2015  January 22, 2016  $0.18(1)  $5,674  

three most recent fiscal years:
Date Declared Record Date Payment Date Per Share Amount 
March 11, 2015 March 13, 2015 April 17, 2015 $0.37
 
June 24, 2015 June 30, 2015 July 22, 2015 $0.37
 
September 24, 2015 September 24, 2015 October 22, 2015 $0.42
 
December 29, 2015 December 29, 2015 January 22, 2016 $0.40
 
December 29, 2015 December 29, 2015 January 22, 2016 $0.18
(1) 
March 10, 2016 March 14, 2016 April 22, 2016 $0.40
 
June 8, 2016 June 8, 2016 July 22, 2016 $0.40
 
September 28, 2016 September 28, 2016 October 24, 2016 $0.40
 
December 29, 2016 December 29, 2016 January 24, 2017 $0.41
 
December 29, 2016 December 29, 2016 January 24, 2017 $0.07
(1) 
March 20, 2017
 March 20, 2017
 April 24, 2017 $0.41
 
June 20, 2017 June 30, 2017 July 18, 2017 $0.37
 
August 7, 2017 September 29, 2017 October 18, 2017 $0.37
 
November 7, 2017 December 29, 2017 January 17, 2018 $0.37
 
December 13, 2017 December 29, 2017 January 17, 2018 $0.12
(1) 
(1)Represents a special dividend.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, no dividends or distributions had been declared or paid by the Company.

9.



10. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following is a schedule of consolidated financial highlights for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013:

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2015  2014  2013 

Per Share Data:

    

Net asset value per share, beginning of year

  $18.86   $19.42   $20.00  

Net investment income (loss)(1)

   1.43    1.09    (0.55

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

   (0.52  (0.49  (0.34
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

   0.91    0.60    (0.89
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Dividends declared(2)

   (1.74  (1.25  —   

Effect of subscription offering price(3)

   0.11    0.09    0.32  

Offering costs

   —     —     (0.01
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net asset value per share, end of year

  $18.14   $18.86   $19.42  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Number of shares outstanding, end of year

   31,524,083    17,932,697    9,575,990  

Total return(4)

   5.41  3.55  (2.90)% 

Net assets, end of year

  $571,726   $338,257   $186,002  

Ratio to average net assets (5):

    

Expenses net of waiver, before incentive fees

   5.11  5.78  9.75

Expenses net of waiver, after incentive fees

   6.94  7.15  9.75

Expenses gross of waiver, after incentive fees

   7.86  7.98  10.21

Net investment income (loss)(6)

   7.33  5.45  (2.45)% 

Interest expense and credit facility fees

   2.37  2.56  2.23

Ratios/Supplemental Data:

    

Asset coverage

   212.70  209.67  378.35

Portfolio turnover

   26.04  28.06  6.43

Total committed capital, end of year

  $1,174,340   $1,129,522   $877,408  

Ratio of total contributed capital to total committed capital, end of year

   52.38  31.23  21.43

Weighted-average shares outstanding

   24,830,200    13,091,544    3,016,298  

 For the years ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Per Share Data:         
Net asset value per share, beginning of year$18.32
 $18.14
 $18.86
 $19.42
 $20.00
Net investment income (loss) (1)
1.74
 1.65
 1.43
 1.09
 (0.55)
Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments(0.19) 0.20
 (0.52) (0.49) (0.34)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations1.55
 1.85
 0.91
 0.60
 (0.89)
Dividends declared (2)
(1.64) (1.68) (1.74) (1.25) 
Effect of offering price of subscriptions and the offering price of common stock in the IPO, net of underwriting and offering costs (3)
(0.11) 0.01
 0.11
 0.09
 0.31
Net asset value per share, end of year$18.12
 $18.32
 $18.14
 $18.86
 $19.42
Market price per share, end of year$20.04
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
Number of shares outstanding, end of year62,207,603
 41,702,318
 31,524,083
 17,932,697
 9,575,990
Total return based on net asset value (4)
7.86% 10.25% 5.41% 3.55% (2.90)%
Total return based on market price (5)
14.97% n/a
 n/a
 n/a
 n/a
Net assets, end of year$1,127,304
 $764,137
 $571,726
 $338,257
 $186,002
Ratio to average net assets (6):
         
Expenses net of waiver, before incentive fees5.25% 5.46% 5.11% 5.78% 9.75 %
Expenses net of waiver, after incentive fees7.39% 7.69% 6.94% 7.15% 9.75 %
Expenses gross of waiver, after incentive fees7.97% 8.62% 7.86% 7.98% 10.21 %
Net investment income (loss) (7)
9.35% 8.93% 7.33% 5.45% (2.45)%
Interest expense and credit facility fees2.69% 2.85% 2.37% 2.56% 2.23 %
Ratios/Supplemental Data:         
Asset coverage, end of period234.86% 209.97% 212.70% 209.67% 378.35 %
Portfolio turnover49.18% 32.39% 26.04% 28.06% 6.43 %
Weighted-average shares outstanding52,997,450
 36,152,390
 24,830,200
 13,091,544
 3,016,298
(1)For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2014,2013, net investment income (loss) per share was calculated as net investment income (loss) for the year divided by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the year. For the year ended December 31, 2013, net investment income (loss) per share was calculated as net investment income (loss) for the period divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period June 5, 2013 (date of issuance of shares related to the first capital drawdown) through December 31, 2013.
(2)For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2014,2013, dividends declared per share was calculated as the sum of dividends declared during the year divided by the number of shares outstanding at each respective quarter-end date (refer to Note 8)Notes 9 and 12).
(3)Increase (decrease) is due to the offering price of subscriptions and the issuance of common stock in the IPO, net of underwriting and offering costs during the yearperiod (refer to Note 8)9).
(4)Total return is based on the change in net asset value per share during the year plus the declared dividends, assuming reinvestment of dividends in accordance with the dividend reinvestment plan, divided by the beginning net asset value for the year. Total return based on change in net asset value for the year ended December 31, 2013 was calculated for the period from commencement of operations through December 31, 2013. Total return for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was inclusive of $(0.11), $0.01, $0.11, $0.09, and $0.32 respectively, per share increase (decrease) in net asset value for the years related to the offering price of subscriptions.subscriptions and the offering price of common stock in the IPO, net of underwriting and offering costs during the year. Excluding the effects of the higher offering price of subscriptions,these common stock issuances, total return would have been 8.46%, 10.20%, 4.83%, 3.09%, and (4.50%), respectively (refer to Note 8)9).

(5)Total return based on market value (not annualized) is calculated as the change in market value per share during the period plus the declared dividends, assuming reinvestment of dividends in accordance with the dividend reinvestment



plan, divided by the beginning market price for the period. The beginning market value per share is based on the IPO offering price of $18.50 per share.
(6)The Company commenced operations on May 2, 2013; therefore, ratios to average net assets and portfolio turnover for the year ended December 31, 2013 may have been different had there been a full year of operations.
(6)
(7)The net investment income ratio is net of the waiver of base management fees.

10.

11. LITIGATION

The Company may become party to certain lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of current matters, if any, will materially impact the Company or its consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company was not subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to the Company’s knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against the Company.

In addition, portfolio investments of the Company could be the subject of litigation or regulatory investigations in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any current contingent liabilities of its portfolio investments, if any, will materially affect the Company or these consolidated financial statements.

11.

12. TAX

The Company has not recorded a liability for any uncertain tax positions pursuant to the provisions of ASC 740,Income Taxes, as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014.

2016.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by federal and certain state, local and foreign tax regulators. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company had filed tax returns and therefore is subject to examination.

Book and tax basis differences relating to stockholder dividends and distributions and other permanent book and tax differences are reclassified among the Company’s capital accounts. In addition, the character of income and gains to be distributed is determined in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from US GAAP. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016 , permanent differences primarily due to net operating loss, the tax treatment of passive foreign investment companies and non-deductiblenon- deductible excise tax resulted in a net decrease in accumulated net investment loss by $3,559$6,767 and $178,$13,380, respectively, net decrease in accumulated net realized gain by $3,518$6,499 and $129,$13,302, respectively, and net decrease in additional paid-in capital in excess of par by $41$268 and $49,$78, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities. Total earnings and net asset valueNAV were not affected.

The tax character of the distributions paid for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, 20142017, 2016 and 20132015 was as follows:

   For the years ended
December 31,
 
   2015   2014   2013 

Ordinary income

  $47,689   $18,162   $—   

Tax return of capital

  $—     $—     $—   

 
For the years ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Ordinary income$93,189
 $63,214
 $47,689
Tax return of capital$
 $
 $

Income Tax Information and Distributions to Stockholders

As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the components of accumulated earnings (deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:

   2015   2014 

Undistributed ordinary income

  $2,691    $1,547  

Other book/tax temporary differences (1)

   (2,012   (2,009

Capital loss carryforwards

   (2,411   (56

Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated(2)

   (40,727   (12,965
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accumulated earnings (deficit)

  $(42,459  $(13,483
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 2017 2016
Undistributed ordinary income$4,291
 $5,365
Other book/tax temporary differences(1)(1,770) (2,108)
Capital loss carryforwards(43,967) (25,414)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments (2)(3,063) (13,629)
Total accumulated earnings (deficit)$(44,509) $(35,786)
(1)Consists of the unamortized portion of organization costs as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, respectively. Also, consists of the unamortized portion of the prorated financing costs that were immediately expensed in lieu of continuing to amortize over the term of the Revolving Credit Facility related to the amendment that reduced commitments in the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2014.
(2)The difference between the book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments is attributable primarily to the tax treatment of passive foreign investment companies, which include the structured finance obligations. Also, consists of book to tax difference on interest income on CLO equity investments recognized using the effective yield method for financial statement purposes.



Also, consists of book to tax difference on interest income on CLO equity investments recognized using the effective yield method for financial statement purposes.
As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes and gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments were as follows:

   2015   2014 

Cost of investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

  $1,093,393    $711,628  

Gross unrealized appreciation on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   5,911     2,752  

Gross unrealized depreciation on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

   (46,638   (15,717
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments—non-controlled/non-affiliated

  $(40,727  $(12,965
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 2017 2016
Cost of investments$1,970,594
 $1,436,387
Gross unrealized appreciation on investments25,041
 22,390
Gross unrealized depreciation on investments(28,104) (36,019)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments$(3,063) $(13,629)
On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “RIC Modernization Act”) was enacted which changed various technical rules governing the tax treatment of RICs. The changes are generally effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment. Under the RIC Modernization Act, the fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years, which carry an expiration date. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital losses that are carried forward will retain their character as either short-term or long-term losses rather than being considered all short-term as under previous law. As of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the Company did not have any pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards, and had $2,411$43,967 and $56,$25,414, respectively, of post enactment capital loss carryforwards, $4,107 and $614 of which were post-enactment short-term capital loss carryforwards.

12.carryforwards, respectively, and $39,860 and $24,800, of which were post-enactment long-term capital loss carryforwards, respectively.


13. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

   2015 
   Q4  Q3  Q2   Q1 

Total investment income

  $20,685   $19,601   $15,925    $12,979  

Net expenses

   9,920    9,267    7,980     6,499  

Net investment income (loss)

   10,765    10,334    7,945     6,480  

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

   (20,748  (681  1,270     3,308  

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

   (9,983  9,653    9,215     9,788  

Net asset value per share

   18.14    19.02    19.09     19.05  

Basic and diluted earnings per common share

  $(0.34 $0.35   $0.40    $0.50  

   2014 
   Q4  Q3  Q2   Q1 

Total investment income

  $5,885   $10,522   $9,944    $6,633  

Net expenses

   4,906    4,816    5,408     3,594  

Net investment income (loss)

   979    5,706    4,536     3,039  

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

   (4,910  (4,769  56     977  

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

   (3,931  937    4,592     4,016  

Net asset value per share

   18.86    19.35    19.71     19.63  

Basic and diluted earnings per common share

  $(0.25 $0.07   $0.36    $0.37  

   2013 
   Q4   Q3  Q2  Q1 

Total investment income

  $3,804    $1,145   $20   $—    

Net expenses

   2,092     1,951    2,595    —    

Net investment income (loss)

   1,712     (806  (2,575  —    

Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments

   43     (365  64    —    

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

   1,755     (1,171  (2,511  —    

Net asset value per share

   19.42     19.11    18.72    —    

Basic and diluted earnings per common share

  $0.22    $(0.29 $(7.92 $—    

13.

 2017
 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Total investment income$49,510
 $42,648
 $38,744
 $34,099
Net expenses22,994
 17,568
 17,296
 14,992
Net investment income (loss)26,516
 25,080
 21,448
 19,107
Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments467
 463
 (5,947) (2,934)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations26,983
 25,543
 15,501
 16,173
NAV per share18.12
 18.18
 18.14
 18.30
Basic and diluted earnings per common share$0.44
 $0.41
 $0.34
 $0.39
 2016
 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Total investment income$33,156
 $28,957
 $25,748
 $23,110
Net expenses14,807
 13,111
 12,282
 11,150
Net investment income (loss)18,349
 15,846
 13,466
 11,960
Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments(953) 13,324
 12,485
 (14,668)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations17,396
 29,170
 25,951
 (2,708)
NAV per share18.32
 18.38
 18.02
 17.66
Basic and diluted earnings per common share$0.48
 $0.78
 $0.75
 $(0.08)


 2015
 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Total investment income$20,685
 $19,601
 $15,925
 $12,979
Net expenses9,920
 9,267
 7,980
 6,499
Net investment income (loss)10,765
 10,334
 7,945
 6,480
Net realized gain (loss) and net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments(20,748) (681) 1,270
 3,308
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations(9,983) 9,653
 9,215
 9,788
NAV per share18.14
 19.02
 19.09
 19.05
Basic and diluted earnings per common share$(0.34) $0.35
 $0.40
 $0.50
14. NFIC ACQUISITION
On June 9, 2017 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company closed the NFIC Acquisition, with the Company as the surviving entity. As of the effective time of the NFIC Acquisition, each share of common stock of NFIC was converted into the right to receive a mixture of cash and shares of common stock of the Company, in accordance with the elections of the NFIC stockholders (the “Elections”). Based on the results of the Elections, the NFIC stockholders received in the aggregate 434,233 shares of common stock of the Company and approximately $145,602 in cash.

The NFIC Acquisition was accounted for under the asset acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. As the acquirer for accounting purposes, the Company allocated the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of NFIC’s assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the Acquisition Date. There was no goodwill created because the NFIC Acquisition was accounted for as an asset acquisition.

The Company used the fair market value of NFIC’s assets and liabilities as of the Acquisition Date to account for the NFIC Acquisition. The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of NFIC as of the Acquisition Date:
ASSETS 
Total investments, at fair value$190,672
Cash and other assets12,464
Total assets$203,136
LIABILITIES 
Secured borrowings$42,128
Other accrued expenses and liabilities7,360
Total liabilities49,488
NET ASSETS 
Total net assets$153,648
On June 9, 2017, the debt assumed as part of the NFIC Acquisition was fully repaid.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred $322 in professional fees and other costs related to the NFIC Acquisition. The Company determined that the fair value of the net assets acquired equaled the purchase price excluding these costs. Accordingly, these costs related to the NFIC Acquisition were expensed.
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. There have been no subsequent events that require recognition or disclosure through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued, except as disclosed below.

On February 26, 2016, the Company issued a capital call and delivered capital drawdown notices totaling $33,000. Proceeds from the capital call were due and the related issuance of 1,815,181 shares occurred on March 11, 2016.

Subsequent to December 31, 2015,2017, the Company borrowed $72,000$194,250 under the Credit Facility and SPV Credit Facility to fund investment acquisitions. The Company also voluntarily repaid $42,000$227,420 under the Credit Facility and SPV Credit Facility.



On March 10, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved the renewal of the Company’s Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser and the Company’s Administration Agreement with the Administrator, each for an additional one year term.

On March 10, 2016,February 26, 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.40$0.37 per share, which is payable on or about April 22, 201617, 2018 to holders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on March 14, 2016.

On February 29, 2016, the Company and Credit Partners USA LLC (“Credit Partners”) entered into a Limited Liability Company agreement to co-manage Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC (“Credit Fund”). Credit Fund will primarily invest in first lien loans of middle-market companies. Credit Fund is managed by a six-member board of managers, on which the Company and Credit Partners each have equal representation. The Company and Credit Partners each have 50% economic ownership of Credit Fund and have commitments to fund, from time to time, capital of up to $400 million each.

2018.

Item 9. Changes and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.



Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our PresidentChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”))Act). Based on that evaluation, our PresidentChief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them of material information relating to the Company that is required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of its PresidentChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of its consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152017 based on the framework established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20152017 was effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report

Attestation Report of the Company’sRegistered Public Accounting Firm

Our independent registered public accounting firm, due toErnst & Young LLP, has issued an exemption for emerging growth companies underaudit report on the JOBS Act.

effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20152017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement relating to our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Principal Executive and Senior Financial Officers under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “SOX Code of Ethics”), which applies to, among others, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. There have been no material changes to our SOX Code of Ethics or material waivers of the code that apply to our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer. We hereby undertake to provide a copy of this code to any person, without charge, upon request. Requests for a copy of this code may be made in writing addressed to the Secretary of the Company, Matthew Cottrell, Carlyle GMS Finance, Inc., 520 Madison Avenue, 38th Floor, New York, NY.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement relating to our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement relating to our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement relating to our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information in response to this item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement relating to our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders.



PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents areDocuments filed as part of this annual report:

(1) Financial Statements—Refer toreport

The following reports and consolidated financial statements are set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, which are incorporated herein by reference:

10-K:

 77 


 78 

 79 

 80 

 81 

 82 

95

(2) Financial Statement Schedules required to be

(b) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed by Part II, Item 8as part of this Form 10-K—None are required and therefore all financial statement schedules have been omitted.

(3) Exhibits

report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously field with the SEC:

3.1

Articles of Amendment and Restatement (1)

3.2

3.1
 
3.2
3.3

4.1

3.4
 
4.1

10.1

Advisory Agreement (1)

10.2

Administration Agreement (1)

10.3

Form of Indemnification Agreement (1)

10.4

Loan and Servicing Agreement (2)

10.5

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2014 (4)

10.6

First Amendment, dated as of June 30, 2014, to the Loan and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2013 (5)

10.7

First Amendment, dated as of January 8, 2015, to the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2014 (6)

10.8

Second Amendment, dated as of June 19, 2015, to the Loan and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2013 (7)

10.9

10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8


10.10

10.9
 
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13

10.11

10.14

21.1

10.15
 
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
11.1
21.1

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2



99.1

*Filed herewith.
(1)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-12G/A filed by GMS Financethe Company on April 11, 2013 (File No. 000-54899)
(2)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed by the Company on March 22, 2017 (File No. 000-54899)
(3)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 10-12G/A filed by the Company on April 11, 2013 (File No. 000-54899)
(4)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed by the Company on March 22, 2017 (File No. 000-54899)
(5)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-12G/A filed by the Company on April 11, 2013 (File No. 000-54899)
(6)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by GMS Financethe Company on August 12, 2015 (File No. 814-00995)
(7)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (e)(1) to the Company’s Form N-2 filed by the Company on June 5, 2017 (File No. 333-218114)
(7)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (e)(2) to the Company’s Form N-2 filed by the Company on June 5, 2017 (File No. 333-218114)
(8)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed by the Company on September 20, 2017 (File No. 814-00995)
(9)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (j) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 filed by the Company on May 19, 2017 (File No. 333-218114)
(10)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-12G/A filed by the Company on April 11, 2013 (File No. 000-54899)
(11)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-12G/A filed by the Company on April 11, 2013 (File No. 000-54899)
(12)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on July 31, 2013 (File No. 814-00995)
(3)
(13)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 9, 2014 (File No. 814-00995)
(14)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 13, 2014 (File No. 814-00995)
(15)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed by the Company on March 27, 2015 (File No. 814-00995)
(16)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 8, 2016 (File No. 814-00995)
(17)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 12, 2015 (File No. 814-00995)
(18)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 12, 2015 (File No. 814-00995)
(19)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 12, 2015 (File No. 814-00995)
(20)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 8, 2016 (File No. 814-00995)
(21)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on May 10, 2017 (File No. 814-00995)
(22)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (k)(13) to the Company’s Form N-2 filed by the Company on June 5, 2017 (File No. 333-218114)
(23)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed by the Company on November 10, 2016 (File No. 814-00995)
(24)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed by the Company on May 9, 2017 (File No. 814-00995)
(25)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (r)(1) to the Company’s Form N-2 filed by the Company on June 8, 2017 (File No. 333-218114)
(26)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (r)(2) to the Company’s Form N-2 filed by the Company on June 8, 2017 (File No. 333-218114)


(27)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company's Form 10-12G filed by GMS Financethe Company on February 11, 2013 (File No. 000-54899)
(4)
(28)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q10-K filed by GMS Financethe Company on May 9, 2014February 27, 2018 (File No. 814-00995)
(5)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed by GMS Finance on August 13, 2014 (File No. 814-00995)
(6)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K filed by GMS Finance on March 27, 2015 (File No. 814-00995)
(7)Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed by GMS Finance on August 12, 2015 (File No. 814-00995)
*Filed herewith

(c) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
Separate financial statements of subsidiaries not consolidated:
Consolidated Financial Statements of Middle Market Credit Fund, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period from May 11, 2016 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2016 were filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Form 10-K filed by the Company on February 27, 2018.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


 TCG BDC, INC.
 CARLYLE GMS FINANCE, INC.

Dated: March 11, 2016

16, 2018
 By:By /s/ Michael HartThomas M. Hennigan
  Thomas M. Hennigan
 Michael Hart
 Director and President (principal executive officer)

Dated: March 11, 2016

By:/s/ Venugopal Rathi
Venugopal Rathi

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)

Dated: March 11, 2016

By:/s/ Michael J. Petrick
Michael J. Petrick
Chairman of the Board of Directors

Dated: March 11, 2016

By:/s/ Nigel D.T. Andrews
Nigel D.T. Andrews
Director

Dated: March 11, 2016

By:/s/ William P. Hendry
William P. Hendry
Director

Dated: March 11, 2016

By:/s/ Eliot P.S. Merrill
Eliot P.S. Merrill
Director

Dated: March 11, 2016

By:/s/ John G. Nestor
John G. Nestor
Director

Dated: March 11, 2016

By:/s/ Michael L. Rankowitz
Michael L. Rankowitz
Director

128


67