20162017

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form10-K

(Mark One)

[x]  

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended        December 31, 20162017                                             

OR

 

[  ]  

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from    to    

Commission file number:001-32395

ConocoPhillips

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 01-0562944

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

600 North Dairy Ashford

Houston, TX 77079

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:281-293-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

   

Name of each exchange

on which registered

    Common Stock, $.01 Par ValueNew York Stock Exchange
    6.65% Debentures due July 15, 2018  New York Stock Exchange
    7% Debentures due 2029  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[x]  Yes    [  ]  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

[  ]  Yes    [x]  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[x]  Yes    [  ]  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[x]  Yes    [  ]  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [x]    Accelerated filer[  ]    Non-accelerated filer [  ]    Smaller reporting company [  ]

Emerging growth company [  ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Act). [  ]  Yes    [x]  No

The aggregate market value of common stock held bynon-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2016,2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing price on that date of $43.60,$43.96, was $54.0 billion.

The registrant had 1,235,832,4691,174,577,506 shares of common stock outstanding at January 31, 2017.2018.

Documents incorporated by reference:

Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 16, 201715, 2018 (Part III)

 

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item

   Page    Page 
 PART I     PART I  

1 and 2.

 

Business and Properties

   1  

Business and Properties

   1 
 

Corporate Structure

   1  

Corporate Structure

   1 
 

Segment and Geographic Information

   2  

Segment and Geographic Information

   2 
 

Alaska

   4  

Alaska

   3 
 

Lower 48

   6  

Lower 48

   5 
 

Canada

   9  

Canada

   7 
 

Europe and North Africa

   11  

Europe and North Africa

   8 
 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   13  

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   11 
 

Other International

   18  

Other International

   15 
 

Competition

   21  

Competition

   18 
 

General

   21  

General

   18 

1A.

 

Risk Factors

   23  

Risk Factors

   20 

1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

   27  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   25 

3.

 

Legal Proceedings

   28  

Legal Proceedings

   25 

4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

   28  

Mine Safety Disclosures

   25 
 

Executive Officers of the Registrant

   29  

Executive Officers of the Registrant

   26 
 

 

PART II

 

   

 

PART II

 

  

5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   31  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   27 

6.

 

Selected Financial Data

   33  

Selected Financial Data

   29 

7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   34  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   30 

7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   74  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   72 

8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   77  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   75 

9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   177  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   174 

9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

   177  

Controls and Procedures

   174 

9B.

 

Other Information

   177  

Other Information

   174 
 

 

PART III

 

   

 

PART III

 

  

10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   178  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   175 

11.

 

Executive Compensation

   178  

Executive Compensation

   175 

12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   178  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   175 

13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   178  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   175 

14.

 

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

   178  

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

   175 
 

 

PART IV

 

   

 

PART IV

 

  

15.

 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

   179  

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

   176 
 

Signatures

   189  

Signatures

   188 


PART I

Unless otherwise indicated, “the company,” “we,” “our,” “us” and “ConocoPhillips” are used in this report to refer to the businesses of ConocoPhillips and its consolidated subsidiaries. Items 1 and 2—Business and Properties, contain forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements relating to our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions that are made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to update, revise or correct any forward-looking information unless required to do so under the federal securities laws. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with the company’s disclosures under the heading “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ‘SAFE HARBOR’ PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995,” beginning on page 72.70.

Items 1 and 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

CORPORATE STRUCTURE

ConocoPhillips is the world’s largest independent exploration and production (E&P) company, based on proved reserves and production of liquids and natural gas. ConocoPhillips was incorporated in the state of Delaware on November 16, 2001, in connection with, and in anticipation of, the merger between Conoco Inc. and Phillips Petroleum Company. The merger between Conoco and Phillips was consummated on August 30, 2002.

In April 2012, the ConocoPhillips Board of Directors approvedcompleted the separation of ourthe downstream business into an independent, publicly traded energy company, Phillips 66. Each ConocoPhillips stockholder received one share of Phillips 66 stock for every two shares of ConocoPhillips stock held at the close of business on the record date of April 16, 2012. The separation was completed on April 30, 2012, and activities related to Phillips 66 have been treated as discontinued operations for all periods prior to the separation.

In 2012, we agreed to sell our interest in the North Caspian Sea Production Sharing Agreement (Kashagan) and our Nigeria and Algeria businesses (collectively, the “Disposition Group”). We sold our Nigeria business in the third quarter of 2014, and we sold Kashagan and our Algeria business in the fourth quarter of 2013. Results for the Disposition Group have been reported as discontinued operations in the applicable periods presented. For additional information on the sale of our Nigeria business, see Note 3—Discontinued Operations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, we have operations and activities in 17 countries. Our key focus areas include safely operating producing assets, executing major developments and exploring for new resources in promising areas. Ourdiverse portfolio includes resource-rich North American tight oil and oil sands assets; lower-risk conventional assets in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia; several liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments; and an inventory of global conventional and unconventional exploration prospects.

At December 31, 2016,2017, ConocoPhillips employed approximately 13,30011,400 people worldwide.

We operate in a commodity-price driven industry, subject to volatility. In line with this view, we set our operating plan for 2017, defining our cash allocation priorities which would be reinforced and partly funded by sales of noncore assets during the year. In November 2016, we announced our plannedplan to generate $5 billion to $8 billionbillon of proceeds over two years by optimizing our portfolio to focus on value-preserving, lowcost-of-supply projects that strategically fit our development plans. In 2017, our total consideration from asset disposition program, primarily associated with North American naturaldispositions was approximately $16 billion. We disposed of assets including our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the Foster Creek Christina Lake (FCCL) Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets, overand our interest in the next two years.San Juan Basin gas asset. Proceeds from dispositions were directed towards our cash allocation priorities and for general corporate purposes. For additional information on our cash allocation priorities and our asset sales, see the “Outlook”Business Environment and Executive Overview section ofwithin Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Note 6—4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Sold,Acquired, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,. respectively.

SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

For operating segment and geographic information, see Note 24—23—Segment Disclosures and Related Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

We explore for, produce, transport and market crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids on a worldwide basis. At December 31, 2016,2017, our operations were producing in the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, China, Malaysia, Qatar and Libya.

The information listed below appears in the “Oil and Gas Operations” disclosures following the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and is incorporated herein by reference:

 

Proved worldwide crude oil, natural gas liquids, natural gas and bitumen reserves.
Net production of crude oil, natural gas liquids, natural gas and bitumen.
Average sales prices of crude oil, natural gas liquids, natural gas and bitumen.
Average production costs per barrel of oil equivalent (BOE).
Net wells completed, wells in progress and productive wells.
Developed and undeveloped acreage.

The following table is a summary of the proved reserves information included in the “Oil and Gas Operations” disclosures following the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Approximately 8177 percent of our proved reserves are located in politically stable countries that belong to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Natural gas reserves are converted to BOE based on a 6:1 ratio: six thousand cubic feet (MCF) of natural gas converts to one BOE. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of factors that will enhance the understanding of the following summary reserves table.

 

  Millions of Barrels of Oil Equivalent   Millions of Barrels of Oil Equivalent 

Net Proved Reserves at December 31

                   2016                    2015                    2014                    2017                    2016                    2015  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Crude oil

            

Consolidated operations

   2,047    2,270    2,605     2,322    2,047    2,270  

Equity affiliates

   88    93    103     83    88    93  

 

 

Total Crude Oil

   2,135    2,363    2,708     2,405    2,135    2,363  

 

 

Natural gas liquids

            

Consolidated operations

   457    508    662     354    457    508  

Equity affiliates

   47    50    53     45    47    50  

 

 

Total Natural Gas Liquids

   504    558    715     399    504    558  

 

 

Natural gas

            

Consolidated operations

   1,807    1,988    2,543     1,267    1,807    1,988  

Equity affiliates

   730    878    874     717    730    878  

 

 

Total Natural Gas

   2,537    2,866    3,417     1,984    2,537    2,866  

 

 

Bitumen

            

Consolidated operations

   159    687    598     250    159    687  

Equity affiliates

   1,089    1,706    1,468     -    1,089    1,706  

 

 

Total Bitumen

   1,248    2,393    2,066     250    1,248    2,393  

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   4,470    5,453    6,408     4,193    4,470    5,453  

Total equity affiliates

   1,954    2,727    2,498     845    1,954    2,727  

 

 

Total company

   6,424    8,180    8,906     5,038    6,424    8,180  

 

 

Total production, including Libya, of 1,5691,377 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBOED) decreased 112 percent in 20162017 compared with 2015.2016. The decrease in total average production primarily resulted from normal field declinenoncore asset dispositions, including our Canada and the loss of 72 MBOED mainly attributable to the 2015 dispositions of several non-core assetsSan Juan transactions in the Lower 48, western Canada2017 and the sale of our interest in the Polar Lights CompanyBlock B production sharing contract (PSC) in Russia.Indonesia in 2016, and normal field decline. The decrease in production was partly offset by additional production from major developments, including tight oil plays in the Lower 48; APLNG in Australia; the Western North Slope in Alaska;Malikai and the Kebabangan gas field in Malaysia; Surmont in Canada; and the Greater Ekofisk AreaAPLNG in Norway.Australia. Improved drilling and well performance in Canada,Alaska, Norway the Lower 48, and China as well as lower unplanned downtime in the Lower 48 also partly offset the decrease in production. Assets soldExcluding Libya, our 2017 production was 1,356 MBOED. Adjusted for the impact of closed and planned dispositions of 191 MBOED in 2016 produced 27 MBOED2017 and 36434 MBOED in 2016 and 2015, respectively.Libya, underlying production increased 32 MBOED, or 3 percent, compared with 2016.

Our worldwide annual average realized price was $39.19 per BOE in 2017, an increase of 38 percent compared with $28.35 per BOE in 2016, a decrease of 17 percent compared with $34.34 per BOE in 2015, which reflected lowerreflecting higher average realized prices across all commodities. Our worldwide annual average crude oil price decreased 15increased 27 percent in 2016,2017, from $48.26 per barrel in 2015 to $40.86 per barrel in 2016.2016 to $51.96 per barrel in 2017. Additionally, our worldwide annual average natural gas liquids prices decreased 6increased 51 percent, from $17.79 per barrel in 2015 to $16.68 per barrel in 2016.2016 to $25.22 per barrel in 2017. Our worldwide annual average natural gas price decreased 24increased 36 percent, from $3.96 per MCF in 2015 to $3.00 per MCF in 2016.2016 to $4.07 per MCF in 2017. Average annual bitumen prices also decreased 18increased 48 percent, from $18.72 per barrel in 2015 to $15.27 per barrel in 2016.2016 to $22.66 per barrel in 2017.

ALASKA

The Alaska segment primarily explores for, produces, transports and markets crude oil, natural gas liquids,and natural gas and LNG.liquids. We are the largest crude oil producer in Alaska and have major ownership interests in two of North America’s largest oil fields located on Alaska’s North Slope: Prudhoe Bay and Kuparuk. We also have a significant operating interest in the Alpine Field, located on the Western North Slope. Additionally, we are one of Alaska’s largest owners of state, federal and fee exploration leases, with approximately 0.51 million net undeveloped acres atyear-end 2016. Following the impairment of our Chukchi Sea leases in the fourth quarter of 2015, we surrendered 0.3 million acres in the Chukchi Sea in May 2016. In 2016, 2017. Alaska operations contributed 1922 percent of our worldwide liquids production and less than 1 percent of our natural gas production.

 

   2016     2017 
   Interest  Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
  
Natural Gas
MMCFD
 
** 
  
Total
MBOED
 
 
       Interest      Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
  
Natural Gas
MMCFD
 
** 
  
Total
MBOED
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

              

Greater Prudhoe Area

   36.1 BP    88  9  90    36.1 BP    88  5  89 

Greater Kuparuk Area

   52.2–55.5  ConocoPhillips    50   -  50    52.2–55.5  ConocoPhillips    53  1  53 

Western North Slope

   78.0  ConocoPhillips    37  1  37    78.0  ConocoPhillips    40  1  40 

Cook Inlet Area

   33.3-100.0  ConocoPhillips    -  15  2 

 

 

Total Alaska

      175  25  179       181  7  182 

 

 

*Thousands of barrels per day.

**Millions of cubic feet per day.

Greater Prudhoe Area

The Greater Prudhoe Area includes the Prudhoe Bay Field and five satellite fields, as well as the Greater Point McIntyre Area fields. Prudhoe Bay, the largest oil field on Alaska’s North Slope, is the site of a large waterflood and enhanced oil recovery operation, as well as a gas plant which processes natural gas to recover natural gas liquids before reinjection into the reservoir. Prudhoe Bay’s satellites are Aurora, Borealis, Polaris, Midnight Sun and Orion, while the Point McIntyre, Niakuk, Raven, Lisburne and North Prudhoe Bay State fields are part of the Greater Point McIntyre Area.

Greater Kuparuk Area

We operate the Greater Kuparuk Area, which consists of the Kuparuk Field and four satellite fields: Tarn, Tabasco, Meltwater and West Sak. Kuparuk is located 40 miles west of Prudhoe Bay. Field installations include three central production facilities which separate oil, natural gas and water, as well as a separate seawater treatment plant. Development drilling at Kuparuk consists of rotary-drilled wells and horizontal multi-laterals from existing well bores utilizing coiled-tubing drilling.

Drill Site 2S, in the southwestern area of the Kuparuk Field, was sanctioned in October 2014. First oil was achieved in October 2015, and completion of the first phase of the project was achieved in 2016.

The 1H Northeast West Sak (NEWS) oil development targeting the West Sak reservoir in the Kuparuk River Unit, was sanctioned in March 2015. First production is anticipatedwas achieved in 2018.the fourth quarter of 2017.

Western North Slope

On the Western North Slope, we operate the Colville River Unit, which includes the Alpine Field and three satellite fields: Nanuq, Fiord and Qannik. Alpine is located 34 miles west of Kuparuk. In October 2015, first oil was achieved at Alpine West CD5, a new drill site which extends the Alpine reservoir west into the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska(NPR-A). During the year, we approvedcontinued drilling an additional 18 wells bringing CD5 up to its full permit capacity.using the available well slots on the pad.

The Greater Mooses Tooth Unit, the first unit established entirely within theNPR-A, was formed in 2008. In 2017, we began construction in the unit, which is currently planned to have two drill sites; Greater Mooses Tooth #1 and #2, with expected first oil in 2018 and 2020,2021, respectively.

Cook Inlet Area

We have a 100 percentIn January 2018, we sold our interest and are the operator ofin the Kenai LNG Facility in the Cook Inlet Area. The Kenai LNG Facility includesfacility, which consisted of a 1.6million-tons-per-year capacity plant, as well as docking and loading facilities for LNG tankers. LNG from the plant has historically been transported and sold to utility companies in Japan. In February 2016, our export license was renewed for an additional two years. However, there wastankers, had no LNG export program in 20162017 due to market conditions. We are currently marketing this facility.

In April and October 2016, we sold our interests in the Beluga River Unit natural gas field and the North Cook Inlet Unit, respectively, both in the Cook Inlet Area. The full-year 2016 production from the assets sold was 2 MBOED.

Point Thomson

We own aIn the first quarter of 2017, we recorded an asset impairment and assigned our 4.9 percent interest in the Point Thomson Unit, which isunit, located approximately 60 miles east of Prudhoe Bay. An Initial Production System (IPS) was brought online in April 2016, and achieved full productionBay, to the other owners of 400 BOED net of condensate in December.the field.

Alaska North Slope Gas

In 2016, we, along with affiliates of Exxon Mobil Corporation, BP p.l.c. and Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC), a state-owned corporation (collectively, the “AKLNGco-venturers”), completed preliminaryfront-end engineering and design(pre-FEED) technical work for a potential LNG project which would liquefy and export natural gas from Alaska’s North Slope and deliver it to market. In September 2016, we, along with the affiliates of ExxonMobil and BP, indicated our intention not to progress into the next phase of the project due to changes in the economic environment. Given AGDC’s intentionAGDC is continuing to continue efforts to advance a North Slope Gasprogress the project the AKLNG co-venturers executed certain agreements to enhance AGDC’s ability to do so.and has recently signed several Memorandums of Understanding with various potential LNG buyers in Asia. We remain supportive of AGDC’s efforts to progress a project.advance the project and intend to make our equity gas available for sale to the project at mutually agreed, commercially reasonable terms.

Exploration

In 2016, we drilled three exploration wells in the NPR-A. TwoAppraisal of these wells, Tinmiaq 2 and 6, form the Willow discovery, which isDiscovery, located in the northeast portion of the NPR-A. The thirdNational Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, continued throughout 2017 with the acquisition of3-D seismic which is currently being processed. In 2018, we will continue appraisal of the discovery with drilling of additional wells. Further exploration well was recorded to dry hole expenseof other state and federal leases is planned in 2018.

We were successful in state and federal lease sales in the North Slope in the fourth quarter of 2016. Appraisal of the Willow discovery commenced in January 2017, with the acquisition of 3-D seismic. In a follow-up to the Willow discovery, we were successful in December’s state and federal lease sales on the Western North Slope, where we were the high bidder on 13913 tracts for a total of 737,252 grossapproximately 78,000 net acres.

Acquisition

In January 2018, we entered into an agreement to acquire certain oil and gas assets in Alaska. The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval. We will have a 100 percent interest in approximately 1.2 million acres of exploration and development lands, including the Willow Discovery. For additional information, see Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Transportation

We transport the petroleum liquids produced on the North Slope to south central Alaska through an800-mile pipeline that is part of Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). We have a 29.1 percent ownership interest in TAPS, and we also have ownership interests in the Alpine, Kuparuk and Oliktok pipelines on the North Slope.

Our wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary, Polar Tankers, Inc., manages the marine transportation of our North Slope production, using five company-owned, double-hulled tankers, and charters third-party vessels as necessary. The tankers deliver oil from Valdez, Alaska, primarily to refineries on the west coast of the United States.

LOWER 48

The Lower 48 segment consists of operations located in the U.S. Lower 48 states and the Gulf of Mexico. The Lower 48 business is organized within three regions covering the Gulf Coast,Mid-Continent and Rockies. As a result of tight oil opportunities, we have directed our investments toward certain shorter cycle time, lowcost-of-supply plays. In July 2015, we announcedWe disposed of several noncore assets within the Lower 48 in 2017, including our plan to reduce future deepwater exploration spending. We have subsequently terminated our Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contracts.interests in the San Juan Basin and the Panhandle. We hold 12.410.4 million net onshore and offshore acres in the Lower 48. In 2016,2017, the Lower 48 contributed 30 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 3227 percent of our natural gas production.

 

   2016     2017 
           Interest          Operator    
        Liquids
MBD
 
 
   
        Natural Gas
MMCFD
 
 
   
Total 
        MBOED 
 
 
           Interest          Operator    
        Liquids
MBD
 
 
   
        Natural Gas
MMCFD
 
 
   
Total
        MBOED
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

                  

Eagle Ford

   Various Various    129    193    161     Various Various    107    155    133 

Gulf of Mexico

   Various  Various    15    13    17     Various  Various    15    13    17 

Gulf Coast—Other

   Various  Various    5    18        Various  Various    5    11    7 

 

 

Total Gulf Coast

      149    224    186        127    179    157 

 

 

Permian

   Various  Various    42    130    64     Various  Various    41    132    63 

Barnett

   Various  Various    5    36    11     Various  Various    4    34    10 

Anadarko Basin

   Various  Various    5    102    22     Various  Various    4    91    19 

 

 

Total Mid-Continent

      52    268    97        49    257    92 

 

 

Bakken

   Various  Various    53    50    61     Various  Various    56    56    65 

Wyoming/Uinta

   Various  Various    -    89    15     Various  Various    -    84    14 

Niobrara

   Various  Various    2    4        Various  Various    2    3    3 

San Juan

   Various  Various    27    584    124     Various  Various    15    319    68 

 

 

Total Rockies

      82    727    203        73    462    150 

 

 

Total U.S. Lower 48

      283    1,219    486        249    898    399 

 

 

Onshore

We hold 12.310.4 million net acres of onshore conventional and unconventional acreage in the Lower 48, the majority of which is either held by production or owned by the company. Our unconventional holdings total approximately 2.61.8 million net acres in the following areas:

 

900,000 net acres in the San Juan Basin, located in northwestern New Mexico and southwestern Colorado.
620,000630,000 net acres in the Bakken, located in North Dakota and eastern Montana.
213,000210,000 net acres in the Eagle Ford, located in South Texas.
104,000 net acres in the Niobrara, located in northeastern Colorado.
123,500134,000 net acres in the Permian, located in West Texas and southeastern New Mexico.

68,00098,000 net acres in the Niobrara, located in northeastern Colorado.
66,000 net acres in the Barnett, located in north central Texas.
591,000639,000 net acres in other unconventional exploration plays.

The majority of our 20162017 onshore production originated from the Eagle Ford,Ford; San Juan, Permianwhich we disposed of during the year; Bakken; and Bakken.Permian. Onshore activities in 20162017 were centered mostly on continued development of emerging and existing assets, with an emphasis on areas with low cost of supply, particularly in growing unconventional plays. The 20162017 drilling activity levels declinedincreased relative to 20152016 due to reducedhigher capital spending in the low commodity price environment.spending. Our major focus areas in 20162017 included the following:

 

Eagle Ford—The Eagle Ford scaled downcontinued full-field development in 2016.2017. We operated threesix rigs on average in 2016,2017, resulting in 69133 operated wells drilled and 8094 operated wells brought online. Production decreased 717 percent in 20162017 compared with 2015,2016, and reached a net peak of 176164 MBOED, compared with 190176 MBOED in 2015.2016.
Bakken—We operated twofour rigs on average throughout the year in the Bakken. We continued our pad drilling efficiency, drilling 34with 87 operated wells drilled during the year and bringing 3764 operated wells brought online. We achieved net peak production of 75 MBOED in 2017, compared with 72 MBOED in 2016, compared with 80 MBOED in 2015.
San Juan Basin—The San Juan Basin includes significant conventional gas production, which yields approximately 20 percent natural gas liquids, as well as the majority of our U.S. coalbed methane (CBM) production. We hold approximately 1.3 million net acres of oil and gas leases by production in San Juan, including approximately 900,000 net unconventional acres of lease rights.2016.
Permian Basin—The Permian Basin is an area where we are leveraging our conventional legacy position by utilizing new technology to improve the ultimate recovery and value from these fields. This technology should also identify new, unconventional plays across the region. We hold approximately 1.01 million net acres in the Permian, which includes 123,500134,000 net unconventional acres. The Permian Basin produced 6463 MBOED in 2017, staying essentially flat with 2016, which includes 15including 19 MBOED of unconventional production.

In 2015, weWe completed the sale of certain non-coreour interests in the San Juan Basin on July 31, 2017, and Panhandle assets in East Texas and North Louisiana and South Texas.on September 29, 2017. Production from the assets sold was 3374 MBOED, approximately 619 percent of the total Lower 48 segment production in 2015. In the second quarter of 2016, we completed the sale of certain non-core assets2017. For additional information on our asset dispositions, see Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired, in the Delaware basin. The full-year 2016 production from the assets sold was 1 MBOED.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Gulf of Mexico

Atyear-end 2016, 2017, our portfolio of producing properties in the Gulf of Mexico primarily consisted of one operated field and three fields operated byco-venturers, totaling approximately 68,000 net acres, including:

 

75 percent operated working interest in the Magnolia Field in Garden Banks Blocks 783 and 784.
15.9 percent nonoperated working interest in the unitized Ursa Field located in the Mississippi Canyon Area.
15.9 percent nonoperated working interest in the Princess Field, a northern subsalt extension of the Ursa Field.
12.4 percent nonoperated working interest in the unitized K2 Field, comprised of seven blocks in the Green Canyon Area.

Exploration

 

  Conventional Exploration

At December 31, 2016,2017, we held approximately 73,0005,000 net acres in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.

We own aOur 30 percent nonoperated working interest in the Shenandoah discovery which was announced in 2009, and had a net book value of $286 million at December 31, 2016. Appraisal drilling continued in 2016 with the fifth Shenandoah well reaching total depth in the third quarter.2009. In Februaryearly 2017, the sixth Shenandoah well, ShenandoahWR52-3, reached total depth. Drillingdepth and was followed by the drilling of a sidetrack well from Shenandoah WR52-3 also commenced in February.

As partWR52-3. Following the suspension of our continued phased exit from deepwater exploration, in 2016, we decided not to pursue further development ofappraisal activity by the nonoperated Gibson and Tiber wells, collectively known asoperator during the Tigris project. Accordingly,year, we recorded dry hole expenses for previously suspended Gibson and Tiber wells, and impairment charges for the applicable leaseholds.

We recorded dry hole and associated leasehold impairment expense in the first quarter of 2016 for the Melmar exploration well.entire development. On December 19, 2017, we elected to withdraw from the Shenandoah leases. The withdrawal was effective February 17, 2018.

  Unconventional Exploration

In 2016, we drilled a total of five operated unconventional wells, primarily in the Eagle Ford. Our onshore focus areas include the Niobrara in the Denver-Julesburg Basin and the Permian in the Delaware Basin and the Niobrara in the Denver-Julesburg Basin, as well as several emerging plays. We continue to assess and appraise these and other unconventional opportunities.

Facilities

Freeport LNG Terminal

In July 2013,2016 and 2017, we agreed with Freeport LNG Development, L.P. to terminate our long-term agreement to use 0.9 billion cubic feet per daydrilled a total of regasification capacity at Freeport’s 1.5 billion cubic-feet-per-day LNG receiving terminal in Quintana, Texas. The termination agreement conditions were satisfied in 2014. Our terminal regasification capacity was reduced to zero on July 1, 2016. For additional information, see Note 7—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables,five operated unconventional wells in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Powder River Basin, four of which were expensed as dry holes in November 2017. The fifth Powder River Basin well was expensed as a dry hole in January 2018.

Facilities

Golden Pass LNG Terminal

We have a 12.4 percent ownership interest in the Golden Pass LNG Terminal and affiliated Golden Pass Pipeline, with a combined net book value of approximately $260$247 million at December 31, 2016.2017. It is located adjacent to the Sabine-Neches Industrial Ship Channel northwest of Sabine Pass, Texas. The terminal became commercially operational in May 2011. We hold terminal and pipeline capacity for the receipt, storage and regasification of the LNG purchased from Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited (3) (QG3) and the transportation of regasified LNG to interconnect with major interstate natural gas pipelines. Utilization of the terminal has been and is expected to be limited, as market conditions currently favor the flow of LNG to European and Asian markets. As a result, we are evaluating opportunities to optimize the value of the terminal facilities.

Greater Northern Iron Ore Properties Trust

We held the reversionary interest in the Greater Northern Iron Ore Properties trust (the Trust), a grantor trust that owns mineral and surface interests in the Mesabi Iron Range in northeastern Minnesota and certain other personal property. Pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreement, the Trust terminated on April 6, 2015. On November 3, 2016, the end of the wind-down period, documents memorializing our ownership of certain Trust property, including all the Trust’s mineral properties and active leases, were delivered to us. The $144 million fair value of the Trust’s net assets transferred to us and a gain of $88 million were both recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016. On December 8, 2016, we closed on a sale of the Trust’s and certain other assets for net proceeds of $148 million. For additional information, see Note 6—Assets Held for Sale or Sold, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other

San Juan Gas Plant—We operate and own a 50 percent interest in the San Juan Gas Plant, a 550 million cubic-feet-per-day capacity natural gas processing plant in Bloomfield, New Mexico.
Lost Cabin Gas Plant—We operate and own a 46 percent interest in the Lost Cabin Gas Plant, a 312246 millioncubic-feet-per-day capacity natural gas processing facility in Lysite, Wyoming.
Helena Condensate Processing Facility—We operate and own the Helena Condensate Processing Facility, a 90,000 110,000barrel-per-day condensate processing plant located in Kenedy, Texas.

Sugarloaf Condensate Processing Facility—We operate and own an 87.5 percent interest in the Sugarloaf Condensate Processing Facility, a 30,000barrel-per-day condensate processing plant located near Pawnee, Texas.
Bordovsky Condensate Processing Facility—We operate and own the Bordovsky Condensate Processing Facility, a 15,000barrel-per-day condensate processing plant located in Kenedy, Texas.

CANADA

Our Canadian operations mainly consist of natural gas fields in western Canada andan oil sands developmentsdevelopment in the Athabasca Region of northeastern Alberta.Alberta and a liquids-rich unconventional play in western Canada. In 2016,2017, operations in Canada contributed 2316 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 146 percent of our natural gas production.

 

    2016 
       Interest   Operator    
    Liquids
MBD
 
 
   

    Natural
Gas
MMCFD
 
 
 
   
    Bitumen
MBD
 
 
   
Total 
    MBOED 
 
 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

           

Western Canada

   Various  Various    30    524    -    117  

Surmont

   50.0   ConocoPhillips    -    -    35    35  

Foster Creek

   50.0   Cenovus    -    -    70    70  

Christina Lake

   50.0   Cenovus    -    -    78    78  

 

 

Total Canada

      30    524    183    300  

 

 

Western Canada
    2017 
       Interest   Operator    
    Liquids
MBD
 
 
   


    Natural

Gas
MMCFD


 
 

   
    Bitumen
MBD
 
 
   
Total 
    MBOED 
 
 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

           

Western Canada

   Various  Various    12    187    -    43 

Surmont

   50.0   ConocoPhillips    -    -    59    59 

Foster Creek

   50.0   Cenovus    -    -    26    26 

Christina Lake

   50.0   Cenovus    -    -    37    37 

 

 

Total Canada

      12    187    122    165 

 

 

Our operations

On May 17, 2017, we completed the sale of our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the FCCL Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada extend across Alberta and British Columbia. We operategas assets to Cenovus Energy. Production from the assets sold was 103 MBOED, approximately 62 percent of the total Canada segment production in 2017. For additional information on our asset dispositions, see Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or have ownership interests in approximately 30 natural gas processing plantsAcquired, in the region, and, as of December 31, 2016, held leasehold rights in 3.1 million net acres in western Canada. Our investments in 2016 were focused mainly on opportunities in the following three core development areas:Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Deep Basin—We hold leasehold rights in 1.3 million net acres in the Deep Basin, located in northwest Alberta and northeast British Columbia. In 2016, Deep Basin achieved average net production of 46 MBOED, and we drilled eight horizontal wells.
Kaybob-Edson—We hold leasehold rights in 0.7 million net acres in the Kaybob-Edson Area, located south of the Deep Basin in west central Alberta. Net production for Kaybob-Edson averaged 37 MBOED in 2016, and we drilled 15 horizontal wells.
Clearwater—We hold leasehold rights in 0.8 million net acres in the Clearwater area, located in west central Alberta, south of Kaybob-Edson. In 2016, average net production for Clearwater was 34 MBOED.

Oil Sands

Our bitumen resources in Canada are produced via an enhanced thermal oil recovery method called steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), whereby steam is injected into the reservoir, effectively liquefying the heavy bitumen, which is recovered and pumped to the surface for further processing. We hold approximately 0.90.6 million net acres of land in the Athabasca Region of northeastern Alberta.

Surmont—The Surmont oil sands leases are located approximately 35 miles south of Fort McMurray, Alberta. Surmont is a 50/50 joint venture with Total S.A. The second phase of the Surmont 2 project achieved first production in 2015, and production continued to ramp up in 2016. Net production at Surmont increased 21 MBOED in 2016.

FCCL—FCCL Partnership, a Canadian upstream general partnership, is a 50/50 business venture with Cenovus Energy Inc. FCCL’s assets are operated by Cenovus and include the Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Narrows Lake SAGD bitumen developments. FCCL continues to progress development plans for each of these assets.

¡Foster Creek

Foster Creek is located approximately 200 miles northeast of Edmonton, Alberta. With the achievement of first production at Phase G in 2016, there are seven producing phases at Foster Creek, Phases A through G. Net production at Foster Creek increased approximately 5 MBOED in 2016.

¡Christina Lake

Christina Lake is located approximately 75 miles south of Fort McMurray, Alberta. Christina Lake Phase F achieved first production in 2016. There are now six producing phases at Christina Lake. Construction on Phase G, which has a design capacity of 50 MBOED gross, will resume in 2017 after being deferred since 2014. First production from Phase G is expected in the second half of 2019. Net production at Christina Lake increased approximately 6 MBOED in 2016.

¡Narrows Lake

Narrows Lake Phase A, was sanctioned in late 2012 and is expected to have 45 MBOED of gross design production capacity. Construction has been deferred, however, we expect to progress engineering activity in 2017.

Exploration

We hold exploration acreage in fourthree areas of Canada: onshore western Canada, offshore eastern Canada, the Mackenzie Delta/Beaufort Sea Region and the Arctic Islands. Our primary exploration focus is on unconventional plays in western Canada.

 

  ConventionalUnconventional Exploration

During 2014, we entered into a farm-in agreement to acquire a 30 percent nonoperated interest in six exploration licenses coveringWe hold approximately five0.1 million grossnet acres in the deepwater Shelburne Basin, offshore Nova Scotia. In 2016, we recorded dry hole expenses associated withemerging Montney play in northeast British Columbia and 0.2 million net acres in Canol Northwest Territories. Our Montney activity in 2017 included completing two and bringing onstream six appraisal wells and acquiring approximately 27,000 additional net acres. Late appraisal drilling activity will continue in 2018 to further explore the Shelburne Basin, and an impairment charge for the undeveloped leasehold costs. Other related costs have been accrued.

In August 2016, we sold our Newfoundland Partnership, which held a 30 percent nonoperated interest in the exploration license in the Flemish Pass Basin, offshore Newfoundland.area’s resource potential.

 

  UnconventionalConventional Exploration

We hold approximately 0.7 million net acresSurrender of Interest documents for our 30 percent nonoperated working interest in six exploration licenses in the emerging Montney, Muskwa, DuvernayShelburne Basin, offshore Nova Scotia, were submitted on December 15, 2017, to initiate the exit process, following previously announced results of thetwo-well exploration drilling campaign at Cheshire and Canol unconventional plays in Alberta, northeastern British Columbia and the Northwest Territories. During 2016, we completed a lease swap for unproved lands in the Blueberry area and continued to drill exploration and appraisal wells in the Montney play, which extends from British Columbia into Alberta. Full-year 2016 production from the assets swapped was 5 MBOED. For additional information, see Note 6—Assets Held for Sale or Sold, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Monterey Jack.

EUROPE AND NORTH AFRICA

The Europe and North Africa segment consists of operations and exploration activities in Norway, the United Kingdom and Libya. In 2016,2017, operations in Europe and North Africa contributed 1418 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 1215 percent of natural gas production.

Norway

  2016
     

 

           Interest           Operator          Liquids MBD  Natural Gas MMCFD  Total  MBOED 
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

Average Daily Net Production

         

Greater Ekofisk Area

   35.1 ConocoPhillips  54  48  62 

Alvheim

   20.0   Aker BP  11  10  13 

Heidrun

   24.0   Statoil  15  15  17 

Other

   Various   Statoil  16  81  29 

 

Total Norway

     96  154  121 

 

   

2017

           Interest          Operator          Liquids MBD  Natural Gas MMCFD  Total MBOED
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

Average Daily Net Production

         

Greater Ekofisk Area

   35.1 ConocoPhillips  57  50  65 

Alvheim

   20.0  Aker BP  15  13  17 

Heidrun

   24.0  Statoil  13  30  18 

Other

   Various  Statoil  16  107  34 

 

Total Norway

     101  200  134 

 

The Greater Ekofisk Area is located approximately 200 miles offshore Stavanger, Norway, in the North Sea, and comprises three producing fields: Ekofisk, Eldfisk and Embla. Crude oil is exported to Teesside, England, and the natural gas is exported to Emden, Germany. The Ekofisk and Eldfisk fields consist of several production platforms and facilities, including the Ekofisk South and Eldfisk II developments which achieved first production in 2013 while Eldfisk II achieved startup in January 2015.and 2015, respectively. Continued development drilling in the Greater Ekofisk Area will contribute additional production over the coming years, as additional wells come online.

The Alvheim developmentField is located in the northern part of the North Sea near the border with the U.K. sector, and consists of a floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel and subsea installations. Produced crude oil is exported via shuttle tankers, and natural gas is transported to the Scottish Area Gas Evacuation (SAGE) terminal at St. Fergus, Scotland, through the SAGE pipeline.

The Heidrun Field is located in the Norwegian Sea. Produced crude oil is stored in a floating storage unit and exported via shuttle tankers. Part of the natural gas is currently injected into the reservoir for optimization of crude oil production, some gas is exportedtransported to the ContinentEurope via gas processing terminals in Norway, while the remainder is exportedtransported for use as feedstock in a methanol plant in Norway, in which we own an 18 percent interest.

We also have varying ownership interests in five other producing fields in the Norway sector of the North Sea, and in the Norwegian Sea, as well as the Aasta Hansteen development.development in the Norwegian Sea. The operator is targetingplanning for first gas for Aasta Hansteen by late 2018.

Exploration

WeIn 2017, we participated in two nonoperated exploration wellsthe Korpfjell Well in the OsebergBarents Sea and Alvheim areas. Both wells were discoveriesthe Carmen Well in the Heidrun Area of Norway, both of which made gas discoveries. The Carmen Well was considered a discovery and areis currently undergoing evaluation. Weunder evaluation, while the Korpfjell Well is not considered commercial. In 2017, we were awarded threefour new exploration licenses in 2016, including the PL845PL865, PL888, PL890 and PL782SB, both with interests of 40 percent,PL891; and PL859, which has a 15 percent interest.two acreage additions PL053C and PL782SC. Additionally, two new licenses, PL775 and PL626, were captured throughfarm-in.

Transportation

We own a 35.1 percent interest in the Norpipe Oil Pipeline System, a220-mile pipeline which carries crude oil from Ekofisk to a crude oil stabilization and natural gas liquids processing facility in Teesside, England.

United Kingdom

 

   2016  
     

 

 

     2017 
   Interest       Operator     
 
Liquids
MBD
  
  
   

 
 

Natural

Gas
MMCFD

  

  
  

   
 
Total
MBOED
  
  
       Interest          Operator    
        Liquids
MBD
 
 
   


Natural

Gas
MMCFD


 
 

   
Total
MBOED
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

                  

Britannia

   58.7 ConocoPhillips     4     77     17     58.7 ConocoPhillips    3    68    14 

Britannia Satellites

   26.3–83.5 ConocoPhillips     12     72     24     26.3–87.5 ConocoPhillips    13    84    27 

J-Area

   32.5–36.5   ConocoPhillips     10     60     20     32.5–36.5  ConocoPhillips    9    60    19 

Southern North Sea

   Various   ConocoPhillips     -     49     8     Various  ConocoPhillips    -    46    8 

East Irish Sea

   100.0   HRL     -     42     7     100.0  Spirit Energy    -    14    2 

Other

   Various   Various     5     5     6     Various  Various    4    4    5 

 

Total United Kingdom

      31     305     82        29    276    75 

 

 

* Includes the Chevron-operated Alder field, ConocoPhillips equity 26.3%.

         

* Includes the Chevron-operated Alder Field, ConocoPhillips equity 26.3%.

Britannia is one of the largest natural gas and condensate fields in the North Sea. We assumed operatorship of Britannia in August 2015, following the acquisition of third partythird-party equity in Britannia Operator Limited, which is now wholly owned by ConocoPhillips. Condensate is delivered through the Forties Pipeline to an oil stabilization and processing plant near the Grangemouth Refinery in Scotland, while natural gas is transported through Britannia’s line to St. Fergus, Scotland. The Britannia satellite fields, Callanish, Brodgar, Enochdhu and Alder, produce via subsea manifolds and pipelines linked to the Britannia platform. Project startups for the Brodgar H3 susbsea well, and Enochdhu, a single well tie back to Callanish, were achieved in 2015. First gas was achieved from Alder, a single well tie back to Britannia, in the fourth quarter of 2016.Platform.

TheJ-Area consists of the Judy/Joanne, Jade and Jasmine fields, located in the U.K. Central North Sea. The Jasmine FieldJ-Area gas is a high-pressure, high-temperature gas condensate reservoir located approximately six miles west ofprocessed on the Judy Platform. ThePlatform and transported through the Central Area Transmission System Pipeline, while liquids are transported to Teesside through the Norpipe system. AJ-Area development includes a 24-slot wellhead platform with a bridge-linked accommodation and utilities platform, a six-mile, 16-inch multi-phase pipeline bundle, and a riser and processing platform bridge-linkeddrilling campaign commenced in 2017, which is expected to provide additional volumes in the existing Judy Platform.coming years as wells are brought online.

We have various ownership interests in several producing gas fields in the Rotliegendes and Carboniferous areas of the Southern North Sea. Decommissioning activity in the Southern North Sea is ongoing, with final production from the Viking transportation system and associated satellites achieved in early 2016.ongoing. Our interests in the East Irish Sea include the Millom, Dalton and Calder fields, which are operated on our behalf by a third party.

We own a 24 percent interest in the Clair Field, located in the Atlantic Margin. Clair Ridge is the second phase of development for the Clair Field and is comprised of a36-slot drilling and production facility with a bridge-linked accommodation and utilities platform. The new facilities will tie into existing oil and gas export pipelines to the Shetland Islands. Initial production for Clair Ridge is targeted forexpected in 2018.

Exploration

In 2016, we recorded dry hole expense for the fully-owned Temple Wood well in the Greater Britannia Area, which was permanently plugged and abandoned.

Transportation

We operate the Teesside oil and Theddlethorpe gas terminals in which we have 29.3 percent and 50 percent ownership interests, respectively. We also have a 100 percent ownership interest in the Rivers Gas Terminal, operated by a third party.

Greenland

Exploration

In the first quarter of 2016, we completed the process to assign our participating interest in the nonoperated Avinngaq license. Additionally, our operated Qamut license expired on December 31, 2016. Our work program in Greenland is complete, pending certain approvals.

Libya

 

   2016    2017 
  

 

 

      

 

 

 
   Interest                  Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
 
   

Natural
Gas
MMCFD
 
 
 
   
Total
MBOED
 
 
   Interest                  Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
 
   


Natural

Gas
MMCFD

 

 
 

   
Total
MBOED
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

                  

Waha Concession

   16.3 Waha Oil Co.    2    1    2    16.3 Waha Oil Co.    20    8    21 

 

 

Total Libya

      2    1    2       20    8    21 

 

 

The Waha Concession consists of multiple concessions and encompasses nearly 13 million gross acres in the Sirte Basin. Our production operations in Libya and related oil exports were interrupted inmid-2013, as a result of the shutdown of the Es Sider crude oil export terminal at the end of July 2013. The Es Sider Terminal briefly reopened in the third quarter of 2014 and production and liftings resumed temporarily; however, further disruptions occurred in December 2014, and production was shut in again. Production resumed in Libya in October 2016, with three2016. In 2017, we had 17 crude liftings from Es Sider in January 2017.Sider. We expect a gradual, continuedramp-up in activity.

ASIA PACIFIC AND MIDDLE EAST

The Asia Pacific and Middle East segment has exploration and production operations in China, Indonesia, Malaysia and Australia; producing operations in Qatar and Timor-Leste; and exploration activities in Brunei. In 2016,2017, operations in the Asia Pacific and Middle East segment contributed 14 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 4252 percent of natural gas production.

Australia and Timor Sea

 

   2016    2017 
  

 

 

      

 

 

 
   Interest  Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
 
   

Natural

Gas

MMCFD

 

 

 

   
Total
MBOED
 
 
   Interest  Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
 
   

Natural
Gas
MMCFD
 
 
 
   
Total
MBOED
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

                  

Australia Pacific LNG

   37.5  
ConocoPhillips/
Origin Energy
 
 
   -    531    89    37.5  

ConocoPhillips/

Origin Energy

 

 

   -    638    106 

Bayu-Undan

   56.9  ConocoPhillips    13    254    55    56.9  ConocoPhillips    10    233    49 

Athena/Perseus

   50.0  ExxonMobil    -    35    6    50.0  ExxonMobil    -    34    6 

 

 

Total Australia and Timor Sea

      13    820    150       10    905    161 

 

 

Australia Pacific LNG

Australia Pacific LNG Pty Ltd (APLNG), our joint venture with Origin Energy Limited and China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec), is focused on producing CBMcoalbed methane (CBM) from the Bowen and Surat basins in Queensland, Australia, to supply the domestic gas market and convertingconvert the coalbed methaneCBM into LNG. Natural gas is sold to domestic customers, while LNG is exported.for export. Origin operates APLNG’s upstream production and pipeline system, and we operate the downstream LNG facility, located on Curtis Island near Gladstone, Queensland, as well as the LNG export sales business.

Two fully subscribed 4.5 million tonnes-per-year4.5-million-metric-tonnes-per-year LNG trains have been completed. Approximately 3,900 net wells are ultimately envisioned to supply both the domestic gas market and the LNG sales contracts. The wells are supported by gathering systems, central gas processing and compression stations, water treatment facilities, and an export pipeline connecting the gas fields to the LNG facilities. The first APLNG Train 1 cargo sailed in January 2016, and LNG sales continued throughout the year. Train 1 LNG is being sold to Sinopec under a 20-year sales agreement for up to 4.3 million metric tonnes of LNG per year. APLNG Train 2 achieved first production in the third quarter of 2016. The LNG from Train 2 is being sold to Sinopec under a 20-year sales agreementagreements for an additional 3.37.6 million metric tonnes of LNG per year, through 2035, and Japan-based Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. under a20-year sales agreement for approximately 1 million metric tonnes of LNG per year.

APLNG has an $8.5 billion project finance facility, which was fully drawn down and had an outstanding balance of which $8.5$7.9 billion had been drawn from the facility at December 31, 2016.2017. In connection with the execution of the project financing, we provided a completion guarantee for ourpro-rata share of the project finance facility until the project achieves financial completion. In October 2016, we reached financial completion for Train 1, which reduced our associated guarantee by 60 percent. In August 2017, we reached financial completion for Train 2, which removed the remaining guarantee. For additional information, see Note 4—2—Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, and Note 12—11—Guarantees, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Bayu-Undan

The Bayu-Undan gas condensate field is located in the Timor Sea Joint Petroleum Development Area between Timor-Leste and Australia. We also operate and own a 56.9 percent interest in the associated Darwin LNG Facility, located at Wickham Point, Darwin.

The Bayu-Undan natural gas recycle facility processes wet gas; separates, stores and offloads condensate, propane and butane; andre-injects dry gas back into the reservoir. In addition, a310-mile natural gas pipeline connects the facility to the 3.5 million tonnes-per-year3.5-million-metric-tonnes-per-year capacity Darwin LNG Facility. Produced natural gas is piped to the Darwin LNG Plant, where it is converted into LNG before being transported to international markets. In 2016,2017, we sold 168150 billion gross cubic feet of LNG primarily to utility customers in Japan.

The Bayu-Undan Phase Three Development consists of two standalone, subsea horizontal wells tied back to the existing drilling, production and processing platform. The first subsea horizontal well was tied back to the existing drilling, production and processing platform, and commenced production in 2015, while the second well was suspended due to insufficient deliverability to the platform.

A continuation of the Bayu-Undan Phase Three Development is being evaluatedhas been sanctioned with the front-end engineeringinternal, joint venture and design phase approaching completion.regulatory approval in March 2017. The currentproject premise is that drillingconsists of one subsea and two platform wells, willwith drilling to commence in 2018, pending internal, joint venture and regulatory approval.

ConocoPhillips served a NoticeApril 2018. Production is expected to commence in the third quarter of Arbitration on the Timor-Leste Minister of Finance in October 2012 for outstanding disputes related to a series of tax assessments. The arbitration hearing was conducted in Singapore in June 2014 under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Laws (UNCITRAL) arbitration rules, pursuant to the terms of the Tax Stability Agreement with the Timor-Leste government. We reached a settlement with the Timor-Leste government on these disputes in 2016.2018.

Athena/Perseus

The Athena production license(WA-17-L) is located offshore Western Australia and contains part of the Perseus Field, which straddles the boundary withWA-1-L, an adjoining license area. Natural gas is produced from these licenses.licenses, which are due to expire in 2019.

Greater Sunrise

We have a 30 percent interest in the Greater Sunrise natural gas and condensate field located in the Timor Sea. In April 2016, the Timor-Leste Government initiatedand Australia through engagement in a conciliation process under the United Nations Convention ofon the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)have reached agreement on the central elements of a maritime boundary delimitation between them in an attemptthe Timor Sea. The Governments’ agreement, to negotiate permanent maritime boundaries. The conciliation ison-goingbe formalized in a new treaty, constitutes a package that addresses boundaries, the legal status of the Greater Sunrise gas field, the establishment of a Special Regime for Greater Sunrise, a pathway to development of the resource and the sharing of resulting revenue. Discussions are ongoing between the governments of Timor-Leste and Australia.

The UNCLOS conciliation does not directly impact our underlying interests in Sunrise; however, wetwo Governments and the Sunriseco-venturers are unable to commit to further commercial and technical work activities due with respect to the uncertainty created bydevelopment concept for Greater Sunrise. Until the lack of government alignment. Accordingly, currentGovernments and the Sunriseco-venturers are aligned on a development concept, activities are currently restricted to compliance and social investment, as well as maintaining relationships and continued engagement with the Governments for a future development options for Sunrise.option.

Exploration

 

  Conventional Exploration

We operate three exploration permits in the Browse Basin, offshore northwest Australia, in which we own a 40 percent interest in permitsWA-315-P,WA-398-P and TP 28, of the Greater Poseidon Area. The TP 28 Western Australia State exploration permit was granted for five years from January 2017, with a 40 percent working interest and was excised from the existing permits as agreed between state and federal regulators. Phase I of the Browse Basin drilling campaign in 2009/2010 resulted in three discoveries in the Greater Poseidon Area:Poseidon-1,Poseidon-2 andKronos-1. Phase II of the drilling campaign resulted in five additional discoveries:Boreas-1,Zephyros-1,Proteus-1 SD2,Poseidon-North-1 andPharos-1. All wells have been completed, plugged and abandoned.

We operate two retention leases in the Bonaparte Basin, offshore northern Australia, where we own a 37.5 percent interest in leases NT/RL5 and NT/RL6, containing the Barossa and Caldita discoveries. A new 3-D seismic survey was completed over the Barossa and Caldita Field area between August and Octoberfields in 2016. DrillingThe drilling of the nextBarossa-5 andBarossa-6 appraisal well, Barossa-5, commencedwells was completed in January 2017. Drilling of a subsequent well, Barossa-6, may follow dependent on2017 with good quality,gas-bearing reservoir intersected at both. Additionally, the results of Barossa-5.retention lease over the Barossa Discovery was renewed during the year.

Indonesia

 

   2016    2017 
  

 

 

      

 

 

 
   Interest  Operator    

Liquids

MBD

 

 

   

Natural

Gas

MMCFD

 

 

 

   

Total

MBOED

 

 

   Interest  Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
 
   

Natural
Gas
MMCFD
 
 
 
   
Total
MBOED
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

                  

South Natuna Sea Block B

   40.0 ConocoPhillips    8    65    19 

South Sumatra

   45.0–54.0  ConocoPhillips    2    328    57    45.0–54.0 ConocoPhillips    2    308    53 

 

 

Total Indonesia

      10    393    76       2    308    53 

 

 

We operate three production sharing contracts (PSCs)PSCs in Indonesia: The Corridor Block and South Jambi “B,” both located in South Sumatra, and Kualakurun in Central Kalimantan. Currently there is production from the Corridor Block. In 2016, we sold our 40 percent working interest in the offshore South Natuna Sea Block B PSC, which had 3 producing oil fields, and 16 natural gas fields in various stages of development. Full-year 2016 production from South Natuna Sea Block B was 19 MBOED.

South Sumatra

The Corridor PSC consists of five oil fields and seven natural gas fields in various stages of development. Natural gas is supplied from the Grissik and Suban gas processing plants to the Duri steamflood in central Sumatra and to markets in Singapore, Batam and West Java. Production from the South Jambi “B” PSC has reached depletion and field development has been suspended.

Exploration

During 2016, we relinquished our 80 percent interest in the Warim Block PSC. We have a 60 percent working interest in the Kualakurun PSC, located in Central Kalimantan, which was signed in May 2015. This block has an area of approximately 2 million gross acres. During 2017, we acquired2-D seismic data in the area.

Transportation

We are a 35 percent owner of a consortium company that has a 40 percent ownership in PT Transportasi Gas Indonesia, which owns and operates the Grissik to Duri and Grissik to Singapore natural gas pipelines.

China

 

   2016     2017 
  

 

 

      

 

 

 
           Interest           Operator     
 
Liquids
MBD
  
  
   
 
 
Natural
Gas
MMCFD
  
  
  
   
 
Total
MBOED
  
  
           Interest          Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
 
   

Natural
Gas
MMCFD
 
 
 
   
Total
MBOED
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

                  

Penglai

   49.0 CNOOC     32     1     32     49.0 CNOOC    30    -    30 

Panyu

   24.5   CNOOC     9     -     9     24.5  CNOOC    8    -    8 

 

 

Total China

      41     1     41        38    -    38 

 

 

The Penglai 19-3, 19-919-3,19-9 and25-6 fields are located in Bohai Bay Block 11/05. Production from the Phase 1 development of the Penglai19-3 Field began in 2002. Phase 2 included six additional wellhead platforms and an FPSO vessel, and was fully operational by 2009.

As part of further development of the Penglai19-9 Field, a new wellhead platform, which adds up to 62 wells, is progressing according to schedule, with two19 wells completed and brought online inthrough December 2016.2017.

We sanctioned the Penglai19-3/19-9 Phase 3 Project in December 2015. This project will consist of three new wellhead platforms and a central processing platform. First oil from Phase 3 is expected in 2018.

The Panyu development, located in Block 15/34 in the South China Sea, is comprised of three oil fields:Panyu 4-2, Panyu5-1 and Panyu11-6. The production period for Panyu4-2 and5-1 will expire in 2018, and the production period for Panyu11-6 will expire in 2022.

Exploration

In 2016,2017, we participated in a successful appraisal well in the Penglai fields,Field, which will support future development plans. In late 2017, we began a full-field3-D seismic program at Penglai, covering Phase 3 and other future development opportunities. The program is expected to continue in 2018.

Malaysia

 

   2016     2017 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Interest   Operator     
 
Liquids
MBD
  
  
   
 
 
Natural
Gas
MMCFD
  
  
  
   
 
Total
MBOED
  
  
   Interest  Operator    

Liquids

MBD

 

 

   

Natural

Gas

MMCFD

 

 

 

   

Total

MBOED

 

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

                  

Siakap North-Petai

   21.0 Murphy     3     2     3     21.0 Murphy    3    1    3 

Gumusut

   29.0   Shell     36     -     36     29.0  Shell    29    -    29 

KBB

   30.0   KPOC     1     45     9     30.0  KPOC    3    111    22 

Malikai

   35.0  Shell    12    -    12 

 

 

Total Malaysia

      40     47     48        47    112    66 

 

 

We own interests in six PSCs in Malaysia. Three are located off the eastern Malaysian state of Sabah: Block G, Block J and the Kebabangan Cluster (KBBC). Three other blocks, deepwaterDeepwater Block 3E, Block SK313 and BlockWL4-00 are located off the eastern Malaysian state of Sarawak.

Block G

We have a 21 percent interest in the unitized Siakap North-Petai oil field, which began producing in the first quarter of 2014 and reached its estimated net annual peak production of 5 MBOED in 2015.2014.

First production from the Malikai oil field was achieved in December 2016, with estimated net annual peak production of 1821 MBOED expected in 2019.2018. We own a 35 percent interest in Malikai. The Limbayong-1 well was drilled in 2002 and resulted in a gas discovery. The Limbayong-2 appraisal well was drilled in 2013 and resulted in an oil discovery. Development options are being evaluated. We own a 35 percent interestThe well was expensed in the Malikai, Limbayong and Pisagan discoveries.2017.

Block J

First production forfrom the Gumusut Field occurred from an early production system in 2012. Production from a permanent, semi-submersible floating production vessel was achieved in October 2014, with net annual peak production of 36 MBOED reached2014. Our ownership in 2016. Unitization of the Gumusut Field is currently at 29 percent following the finalization of the unitization with Brunei was recorded in 2014 and reduced our ownership interest from 33 percent to an initial 29 percent. A final ownership split is expected to be agreeda redetermination of the Block J and Block K Malaysia Unit, both in 2017. Gumusut Phase 2 infill drilling is planned to start in 2018.

KBBC

We own a 30 percent interest in the KBBC PSC. Development of the KBB gas field commenced in 2011, and first production was achieved in November 2014. Estimated net annual peak production of 26 MBOED is expected in 2018. Development options for the Kamunsu East gas field are being evaluated.

Exploration

We own a 50 percent operated interest in deepwaterDeepwater Block 3E, which encompasses approximately 480,000 gross acres offshore Sarawak. Seismic processing was completed in 2015. TheLangsat-1 exploration well was spuddrilled and expensed as a dry hole in February 2017.

In the fourth quarter of 2016, we entered into afarm-in agreement to acquire a 50 percent interest in Block SK 313, a 1.4 million gross-acre exploration block, effective January 2017. Following completion of theSadok-1 exploration well in January 2017, we assumed operatorship of the block from PETRONAS.

We were awarded BlockWL4-00, which encompasses approximately 629,000 gross acres, in January 2017. We have a 50 percent operated interest in this block which includes theSalam-1 oil discovery. A new

We completed a3-D seismic survey in Block SK 313 and BlockWL4-00 in 2017. Further exploration drilling is planned for 2017 with drilling of an appraisal well expected to occur in 2018.

Brunei

Exploration

We have a 6.25 percent working interest in the deepwater BlockCA-2 PSC, which has an exploration period through December 2018. PSC. Exploration has been ongoing since September 2011, with natural gas discovered at the KelidangNE-1 andKeratau-1 wells in 2013 and at the KeratauSW-1 well Well in 2015. Evaluation of the results is ongoing.

Myanmar

Exploration

In 2014, we were awarded deepwater Block AD-10 in the 2013 Myanmar offshore oil and gas bidding round. We signed the PSC in the second quarter of 2015. In 2016, we assigned our participating interest to the operator.

Qatar

 

   2016    2017 
     

 

 

   

 

 

 
           Interest  Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
 
   

Natural
Gas
MMCFD
 
 
 
   
Total
MBOED
 
 
           Interest  Operator    
Liquids
MBD
 
 
   

Natural
Gas
MMCFD
 
 
 
   
Total
MBOED
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Average Daily Net Production

                  
   Qatargas Operating          Qatargas Operating       

QG3

   30.0 Company Limited    22    368    84    30.0 Company Limited    21    369    83 

 

 

Total Qatar

      22    368    84       21    369    83 

 

 

QG3 is an integrated development jointly owned by Qatar Petroleum (68.5 percent), ConocoPhillips (30 percent) and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (1.5 percent). QG3 consists of upstream natural gas production facilities, which produce approximately 1.4 billion gross cubic feet per day of natural gas from Qatar’s North Field over a 25 year25-year life, in addition to a 7.8 million grosstonnes-per-year LNG facility. LNG is shipped in leased LNG carriers destined for sale globally.

QG3 executed the development of the onshore and offshore assets as a single integrated development with Qatargas 4 (QG4), a joint venture between Qatar Petroleum and Royal Dutch Shell plc. This included the joint development of offshore facilities situated in a common offshore block in the North Field, as well as the construction of two identical LNG process trains and associated gas treating facilities for both the QG3 and QG4 joint ventures. Production from the LNG trains and associated facilities is combined and shared.

OTHER INTERNATIONAL

The Other International segment includes exploration activities in Colombia and Chile. In 2016, we sold ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V., the entity that held our 35 percent interest in three exploration blocks offshore Senegal.

Angola

Exploration

Our 50 percent operated interest in Block 36 and our 30 percent operated interest in Block 37, both of which are located in Angola’s subsalt play trend, expired on December 31, 2016. In February 2017, we reached a settlement agreement on our contract for the Athena drilling rig, initially secured for our four-well commitment program in Angola. As a result of the cancellation, we will recognize a before-tax charge of $43 million net in the first quarter of 2017.

Senegal

Exploration

On October 28, 2016, we sold ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V., the entity that held our 35 percent interest in three exploration blocks offshore Senegal. See Note 6—Assets Held for Sale or Sold, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for information regarding our asset dispositions.

Colombia

Unconventional Exploration

We have an 80 percent operated interest in the Middle Magdalena Basin BlockVMM-3. The block extends over approximately 67,000 net acres and contains thePicoplata-1 well, which completed drilling in 2015. Production tests2015 and appraisaltesting in 2017. Socialization and environmental permitting activities are expected to continue throughout 2018.

In July 2017, ConocoPhillips Colombia Ventures Ltd. and Canacol Energy Colombia S.A. executed an Additional Contract for the exploration and exploitation of unconventional reservoirs in an area identified as theVMM-2 Block. As a result, ConocoPhillips Colombia Ventures Ltd. and Canacol Energy Colombia S.A. also executed a joint operating agreement. We have an 80 percent operated working interest in the area are ongoing.block which extends over approximately 58,000 net acres and is contiguous to theVMM-3 Block.    

We holdIn 2017, we relinquished our 70 percent nonoperated interests in the deep rights in the Santa Isabel Block inand terminated the Middle Magdalena Basin, which covers approximately 71,000 net acres. The relinquishment of the Santa Isabel Block was accepted and the parties are in the process of documenting such relinquishment.

The exploration and production contract for the VMM27 Block, both in the Middle Magdalena Basin, where we held a 30 percent nonoperated interest, has been fully terminated. We also hold a 30 percent nonoperated interest in the VMM28 Block, in the Middle Magdalena Basin, where we are in the process of terminating with the relevant parties and the regulatory agency.Basin.

Chile

Exploration

In June 2016, we entered into an agreement with Empresa Nacional Del Petroleo (ENAP) to acquire an additional 44We have a 49 percent participating interest in the onshore Coiron Block located in the Magallanes Basin in southern Chile where we already had 5 percent participation. AssignmentChile. In December 2017, two wells drilled in 2016, were expensed as dry holes.

Venezuela and Ecuador

For discussion of the additional participating interest to ConocoPhillips was approved by the Chilean Ministry of Energyour contingencies in Venezuela and the Controller General of Chile. ENAP holds the remaining 51 percent participating interest and will continue to be the operator.

In 2016, two exploration wells were successfully drilled, logged and cored. In 2017, we will continue to explore and appraise the Coiron Block.

Venezuela

In October 2014, we filed for arbitration under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) against Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), the Venezuela state oil company, for contractual compensation related to the Petrozuata and Hamaca heavy crude oil projects. The ICC arbitration is a separate and independent legal action from the investment treaty arbitration against the government of Venezuela, which is currently proceeding before an arbitral tribunal under the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement for Investment Disputes (ICSID). The ICSID Tribunal is determining the damages owed to ConocoPhillips as a result of Venezuela’s unlawful expropriation of ConocoPhillips’ significant oil investments in the Petrozuata and Hamaca heavy crude oil projects and the offshore Corocoro development project in June 2007. In October 2016, ConocoPhillips brought fraudulent transfer actions in the U.S. District Court of Delaware against PDVSA, alleging that PDVSA has taken actions to improperly expatriate assets from the United States to Venezuela in an effort to avoid judgment creditors. For additional information,Ecuador, see Note 13—12—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Ecuador

In December 2012, an ICSID Tribunal issued a decision on liability in favor of Burlington Resources, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, finding that Ecuador’s seizure of Blocks 7 and 21 was an unlawful expropriation in violation of the Ecuador-U.S. Bilateral Investment Treaty. In February 2017, the tribunal unanimously awarded Burlington $380 million for Ecuador’s unlawful expropriation and breach of theU.S.-Ecuador bilateral investment treaty. The tribunal also issued a separate decision finding Ecuador to be entitled to $42 million for limited environmental and infrastructure impacts associated with the operations of Burlington and its co-venturer. Ecuador recently filed a request for annulment of this decision with ICSID. The schedule for the annulment process has not yet been set. For additional information, see Note 13—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Discontinued Operations

See Note 3—Discontinued Operations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for information regarding our discontinued operations.

OTHER

Marketing Activities

Our Commercial organization manages our worldwide commodity portfolio, which mainly includes natural gas, crude oil, bitumen, natural gas liquids and LNG. Marketing activities are performed through offices in the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia. In marketing our production, we attempt to minimize flow disruptions, maximize realized prices and manage credit-risk exposure. Commodity sales are generally made at prevailing market prices at the time of sale. We also purchase and sell third-party volumes to better position the company to satisfy customer demand while fully utilizing transportation and storage capacity.

Natural Gas

Our natural gas production, along with third-party purchased gas, is primarily marketed in the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia. Our natural gas is sold to a diverse client portfolio which includes local distribution companies; gas and power utilities; large industrials; independent, integrated or state-owned oil and gas companies; as well as marketing companies. To reduce our market exposure and credit risk, we also transport natural gas via firm and interruptible transportation agreements to major market hubs.

Crude Oil, Bitumen and Natural Gas Liquids

Our crude oil, bitumen and natural gas liquids revenues are derived from production in the United States, Canada, Australia, Asia, Africa and Europe. These commodities are primarily sold under contracts with prices based on market indices, adjusted for location, quality and transportation.

LNG

LNG marketing efforts are focused on equity LNG production facilities located in Australia and Qatar. LNG is primarily sold under long-term contracts with prices based on market indices.

Energy Partnerships

Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC)

We are a founding member of the Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC),MWCC, anon-profit organization formed in 2010, which provides well containment equipment and technology in the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico. MWCC’s containment system meets the U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement requirements for a subsea well containment system that can respond to a deepwater well control incident in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. For additional information, see Note 4—2—Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Subsea Well Response Project (SWRP)

In 2011, we, along with several leading oil and gas companies, launched the Subsea Well Response Project (SWRP),SWRP, anon-profit organization based in Stavanger, Norway, which was created to enhance the industry’s capability to respond to international subsea well control incidents. Through collaboration with Oil Spill Response Limited, anon-profit organization in the United Kingdom, subsea well intervention equipment is available for the industry to use in the event of a subsea well incident. This complements the work being undertaken in the United States by MWCC.

Oil Spill Response Removal Organizations (OSROs)

We maintain memberships in several OSROs across the globe as a key element of our preparedness program in addition to internal response resources. Many of the OSROs arenot-for-profit cooperatives owned by the member companies wherein we may actively participate as a member of the board of directors, steering committee, work group or other supporting role. Globally, our primary OSRO is Oil Spill Response Ltd. based in the U.K., with facilities in several other countries and the ability to respond anywhere in the world. In North America, our primary OSROs include the Marine Spill Response Corporation for the continental U.S. and Alaska Clean Seas and Ship Escort/Response Vessel System for the Alaska North Slope and Prince William Sound, respectively. Internationally, we maintain memberships in various regional OSROs including the Norwegian Clean Seas Association for Operating Companies, Australian Marine Oil Spill Center and Petroleum Industry of Malaysia Mutual Aid Group.

Technology

We have several technology programs that improve our ability to develop unconventional reservoirs, produce heavy oil economically with fewer emissions, improve the efficiency of our company’s exploration program, increase recoveries from our legacy fields, and implement sustainability measures.

Our Optimized Cascade® LNG liquefaction technology business continues to be successful with the demand for new LNG plants. The technology has been licensed for use in 25 LNG trains around the world, with feasibility studies ongoing for additional trains.

RESERVES

We have not filed any information with any other federal authority or agency with respect to our estimated total proved reserves at December 31, 2016.2017. No difference exists between our estimated total proved reserves foryear-end 2016 andyear-end 2015, and year-end 2014, which are shown in this filing, and estimates of these reserves shown in a filing with another federal agency in 2016.2017.

DELIVERY COMMITMENTS

We sell crude oil and natural gas from our producing operations under a variety of contractual arrangements, some of which specify the delivery of a fixed and determinable quantity. Our Commercialcommercial organization also enters into natural gas sales contracts where the source of the natural gas used to fulfill the contract can be the spot market or a combination of our reserves and the spot market. Worldwide, we are contractually committed to deliver approximately 2.01.7 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, including approximately 363303 billion cubic feet related to the noncontrolling interests of consolidated subsidiaries, and 18099 million barrels of crude oil in the future. These contracts have various expiration dates through the year 2027.2029. We expect to fulfill the majority of these delivery commitments with proved developed reserves. In addition, we anticipate using proved undeveloped reserves and spot market purchases to fulfill any remaining commitments. See the disclosure on “Proved Undeveloped Reserves” in the “Oil and Gas Operations” section following the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for information on the development of proved undeveloped reserves.

COMPETITION

We compete with private, public and state-owned companies in all facets of the E&P business. Some of our competitors are larger and have greater resources. Each of our segments is highly competitive, with no single competitor, or small group of competitors, dominating.

We compete with numerous other companies in the industry, including state-owned companies, to locate and obtain new sources of supply and to produce oil, bitumen, natural gas liquids and natural gas in an efficient, cost-effective manner. Based on statistics published in the September 5, 2016,4, 2017, issue of theOil and Gas Journal, we were the third-largest U.S.-based oil and gas company in worldwide liquids production and reserves, and the fourth-largest U.S.-based oil and gas company in worldwide natural gas production and reserves in 2015.2016. We deliver our production into the worldwide commodity markets. Principal methods of competing include geological, geophysical and engineering research and technology; experience and expertise; economic analysis in connection with portfolio management; and safely operating oil and gas producing properties.

GENERAL

At the end of 2016,2017, we held a total of 714734 active patents in 4947 countries worldwide, including 286328 active U.S. patents. During 2016,2017, we received 3732 patents in the United States and 6640 foreign patents. Our products and processes generated licensing revenues of $128$79 million in 2016.2017. The overall profitability of any business segment is not dependent on any single patent, trademark, license, franchise or concession.

Company-sponsored research and development activities charged against earnings were $100 million, $116 million and $222 million in 2017, 2016 and $263 million in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

Health, Safety and Environment

Our Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) organization provides tools and support to our business units and staff groups to help them ensure world class health, safety and environmental performance. The framework through which we safely manage our operations, the HSE Management System Standard, emphasizes process safety, risk management, emergency preparedness and environmental performance, with an intense focus on

process and occupational safety. In support of the goal of zero incidents, HSE milestones and criteria are established annually to drive strong safety performance.

Progress toward these milestones and criteria are measured and reported. HSE audits are conducted on business functions periodically, and improvement actions are established and tracked to completion. We also have detailed processes in place to address sustainable development in our economic, environmental and social performance. Our processes, related tools and requirements focus on water, biodiversity and climate change, as well as social and stakeholder issues.

The environmental information contained in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages 6361 through 6664 under the captions “Environmental” and “Climate Change” is incorporated herein by reference. It includes information on expensed and capitalized environmental costs for 20162017 and those expected for 20172018 and 2018.2019.

Website Access to SEC Reports

Our internet website address iswww.conocophillips.com. Information contained on our internet website is not part of this report on Form10-K.

Our Annual Reports onForm 10-K, Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Q, Current Reports onForm 8-K and any amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with, or furnished to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Alternatively, you may access these reports at the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risk factors in addition to the other information included in this Annual Report on Form10-K. Each of these risk factors could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition, as well as adversely affect the value of an investment in our common stock.

Our operating results, our future rate of growth and the carrying value of our assets are exposed to the effects of changing commodity prices.

Prices for crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, natural gas liquids and LNG can fluctuate widely. Globally, prices for crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, natural gas liquids and LNG have experienced significant declines from their historic levels during 2013 and 2014, with excess of supply relative to global demand leading to global inventory builds. Total average annual prices in 20162017 for Brent crude oil, WTI crude oil, Henry Hub natural gas and our realized natural gas liquids all decreased by more than 5at least 30 percent when compared with 2015. In the fourth quarter of 2016, Brent crude oil, WTI crude oil, Henry Hub natural gas and our realized natural gas liquids prices all increased,2014 despite having improved by at least 18 percent when compared with the same period of 2015.2016. Given volatility in commodity price drivers and the business environment, price trends may not continue or reverse themselves.

Our revenues, operating results and future rate of growth are highly dependent on the prices we receive for our crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, natural gas liquids and LNG. The factors influencing these prices are beyond our control. Lower crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, natural gas liquids and LNG prices may have a material adverse effect on our revenues, operating income, cash flows and liquidity and on the amount of dividends we elect to declare and pay on our common stock. Lower prices may also limit the amount of reserves we can produce economically, adversely affecting our ability to maintain our reserve replacement ratio and accelerating the reduction in our existing reserve levels as we continue production from upstream fields.

Significant reductions in crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, natural gas liquids and LNG prices could also require us to reduce our capital expenditures or impair the carrying value of our assets. In the past twothree years, we recognized several impairments, which are described in Note 9—8—Impairments and the “APLNG” section of Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. If commodity prices remain low relative to their historic levels, and as we continue to optimize our investments and exercise capital flexibility, it is reasonably likely we will incur future impairments to long-lived assets used in operations, investments in nonconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method and unproved properties. Although it is not reasonably practicable to quantify the impact of any future impairments at this time, our results of operations could be adversely affected as a result.

Our ability to declare and pay dividends and repurchase shares is subject to certain considerations.

Dividends are authorized and determined by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion and depend upon a number of factors, including:

 

Cash available for distribution.
Our results of operations and anticipated future results of operations.
Our financial condition, especially in relation to the anticipated future capital needs of our properties.
The level of reserves we establish for future capital expenditures.
The level of distributions paid by comparable companies.
Our operating expenses.
Other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.

We expect to continue to pay quarterly distributions to our stockholders; however, we bear all expenses incurred by our operations, and our funds generated by operations, after deducting these expenses, may not be sufficient to cover desired levels of distributions to our stockholders.

Additionally, our share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares. Any downward revision in our distribution or share repurchase program could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

We may need additional capital in the future, and it may not be available on acceptable terms.

We have historically relied primarily upon cash generated by our operations to fund our operations and strategy, however we have also relied from time to time on access to the debt and equity capital markets for funding. There can be no assurance that additional debt or equity financing will be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, although we anticipate we will be able to repay our existing indebtedness when it matures or in accordance with our stated plans, there can be no assurance we will be able to do so. Our ability to obtain additional financing, or refinance our existing indebtedness when it matures or in accordance with our stated plans, will be subject to a number of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance, investor sentiment and our ability to incur additional debt in compliance with agreements governing our then-outstanding debt. If we are unable to generate sufficient funds from operations or raise additional capital, our growth could be impeded.

In addition, we are regularly evaluated by the major rating agencies based on a number of factors, including our financial strength and conditions affecting the oil and gas industry generally. DueFor example, due to the significant decline in prices for crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, natural gas liquids and LNG in 2015, and the expectation that these prices could remain depressed, in the near future, the major ratings agencies conducted a review of the oil and gas industry and downgraded our debt ratings and those of several companies operating in the industry.industry in 2016. Any downgrade in our credit rating, could increase the cost associated with any additional indebtedness we incur.

Our business may be adversely affected by deterioration in the credit quality of, or defaults under our contracts with, third parties with whom we do business.

The operation of our business requires us to engage in transactions with numerous counterparties operating in a variety of industries, including other companies operating in the oil and gas industry. These counterparties may default on their obligations to us as a result of operational failures or a lack of liquidity, or for other reasons, including bankruptcy. Market speculation about the credit quality of these counterparties, or their ability to continue performing on their existing obligations, may also exacerbate any operational difficulties or liquidity issues they are experiencing, particularly as it relates to other companies in the oil and gas industry as a result of the recent significant declinesvolatility in commodity prices. Any default by any of our counterparties may result in our inability to perform obligations under agreements we have made with third parties or may otherwise adversely affect our business or results of operations. In addition, our rights against any of our counterparties as a result of a default may not be adequate to compensate us for the resulting harm caused or may not be enforceable at all in some circumstances.

Unless we successfully add to our existing proved reserves, our future crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids production will decline, resulting in an adverse impact to our business.

The rate of production from upstream fields generally declines as reserves are depleted. Except to the extent that we conduct successful exploration and development activities, or, through engineering studies, optimize production performance or identify additional or secondary recovery reserves, our proved reserves will decline materially as we produce crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids. Accordingly, to the extent we are unsuccessful in replacing the crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids we produce with good prospects for future production, our business will experience reduced cash flows and results of operations. Any cash conservation efforts we may undertake as a result of commodity price declines may further limit our ability to replace depleted reserves.

The exploration and production of oil and gas is a highly competitive industry.

The exploration and production of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids is a highly competitive business. We compete with private, public and state-owned companies in all facets of the exploration and production business, including to locate and obtain new sources of supply and to produce oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids in an efficient, cost-effective manner. Some of our competitors are larger and have greater resources than we do or may be willing to incur a higher level of risk than we are willing to incur to obtain potential sources of supply. If we are not successful in our competition for new reserves, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Any material change in the factors and assumptions underlying our estimates of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves could impair the quantity and value of those reserves.

Our proved reserve information included in this annual report has been derived from engineering estimates prepared by our personnel. Reserve estimation is a process that involves estimating volumes to be recovered from underground accumulations of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids that cannot be directly measured. As a result, different petroleum engineers, each using industry-accepted geologic and engineering practices and scientific methods, may produce different estimates of reserves and future net cash flows based on the same available data. Any significant future price changes could have a material effect on the quantity and present value of our proved reserves. Any material changes in the factors and assumptions underlying our estimates of these items could result in a material negative impact to the volume of reserves reported or could cause us to incur impairment expenses on property associated with the production of those reserves. Future reserve revisions could also result from changes in, among other things, governmental regulation. In addition to changes in the quantity and value of our proved reserves, the amount of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids that can be obtained from any proved reserve may ultimately be different from those estimated prior to extraction.

We expect to continue to incur substantial capital expenditures and operating costs as a result of our compliance with existing and future environmental laws and regulations. Likewise, future environmental laws and regulations, such as limitations on greenhouse gas emissions, may impact or limit our current business plans and reduce demand for our products.

Our businesses are subject to numerous laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations continue to increase in both number and complexity and affect our operations with respect to, among other things:

 

The discharge of pollutants into the environment.
Emissions into the atmosphere, such as nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, mercury and greenhouse gas emissions.
Carbon taxes.
The handling, use, storage, transportation, disposal and cleanup of hazardous materials and hazardous and nonhazardous wastes.
The dismantlement, abandonment and restoration of our properties and facilities at the end of their useful lives.
Exploration and production activities in certain areas, such as offshore environments, arctic fields, oil sands reservoirs and tight oil plays.

We have incurred and will continue to incur substantial capital, operating and maintenance, and remediation expenditures as a result of these laws and regulations. To the extent these expenditures, as with all costs, are not ultimately reflected in the prices of our products and services, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in future periods could be materially adversely affected.

Although our business operations are designed and operated to accommodate expected climatic conditions, to the extent there are significant changes in the Earth’s climate, such as more severe or frequent weather

conditions in the markets we serve or the areas where our assets reside, we could incur increased expenses, our operations could be materially impacted, and demand for our products could fall. Demand for our products may also be adversely affected by conservation plans and efforts undertaken in response to global climate change, including plans developed in connection with the Paris climate conference in December 2015. Many governments also provide, or may in the future provide, tax advantages and other subsidies to support the use and development of alternative energy technologies. Our operations and the demand for our products could be materially impacted by the development and adoption of these technologies.

Domestic and worldwide political and economic developments could damage our operations and materially reduce our profitability and cash flows.

Actions of the U.S., state, local and foreign governments, through tax and other legislation, executive order and commercial restrictions, including changes resulting from the implementation and interpretation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, could reduce our operating profitability both in the United States and abroad. In certain locations, governments have imposed or proposed restrictions on our operations; special taxes or tax assessments; and payment transparency regulations that could require us to disclose competitively sensitive information or might cause us to violatenon-disclosure laws of other countries. U.S. federal, state and local legislative and regulatory agencies’ initiatives regarding the hydraulic fracturing process could result in operating restrictions or delays in the completion of our oil and gas wells.

The U.S. government can also prevent or restrict us from doing business in foreign countries. These restrictions and those of foreign governments have in the past limited our ability to operate in, or gain access to, opportunities in various countries. Actions by host governments have affected operations significantly in the past, such as the expropriation of our oil assets by the Venezuelan government, and may continue to do so in the future. Changes in domestic and international regulations may affect our ability to obtain or maintain permits, including those necessary for drilling and development of wells or for construction of LNG terminals or regasification facilities in various locations.

Local political and economic factors in international markets could have a material adverse effect on us. Approximately 58 percent of our hydrocarbon production was derived from production outside the United States in 2016,2017, and 5545 percent of our proved reserves, as of December 31, 2016,2017, was located outside the United States. We are subject to risks associated with operations in international markets, including changes in foreign governmental policies relating to crude oil, natural gas, bitumen, natural gas liquids or LNG pricing and taxation, other political, economic or diplomatic developments, changing political conditions and international monetary fluctuations. In particular, some countries where we operate lack well-developed legal systems or have not adopted clear legal and regulatory frameworks for oil and gas exploration and production. This lack of legal certainty exposes our operations to increased risks, including increased difficulty in enforcing our agreements in those jurisdictions and increased risks of adverse actions by local government authorities, such as expropriations.

Changes in governmental regulations may impose price controls and limitations on production of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids.

Our operations are subject to extensive governmental regulations. From time to time, regulatory agencies have imposed price controls and limitations on production by restricting the rate of flow of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas and natural gas liquids wells below actual production capacity. Because legal requirements are frequently changed and subject to interpretation, we cannot predict the effect of these requirements.

Our investments in joint ventures decrease our ability to manage risk.

We conduct many of our operations through joint ventures in which we may share control with our joint venture partners. There is a risk our joint venture participants may at any time have economic, business or legal interests or goals that are inconsistent with those of the joint venture or us, or our joint venture partners may be unable to meet their economic or other obligations and we may be required to fulfill those obligations alone. Failure by us, or an entity in which we have a joint venture interest, to adequately manage the risks associated with any acquisitions or joint ventures could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of our joint ventures and, in turn, our business and operations.

We may not be able to successfully complete any disposition we elect to pursue.

From time to time, we may seek to divest portions of our business or investments that are not important to our ongoing strategic objectives. Any dispositions we undertake may involve numerous risks and uncertainties, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. In particular, we may not be able to successfully complete any disposition on a timeline or on terms acceptable to us, if at all, whether due to market conditions, regulatory challenges or other concerns. In addition, the reinvestment of capital from disposition proceeds may not ultimately yield investment returns in line with our internal or external expectations. Any dispositions we pursue may also result in disruption to other parts of our business, including through the diversion of resources and management attention from our ongoing business and other strategic matters, or through the disruption of relationships with our employees and key vendors. Further, in connection with any disposition, we may enter into transition services agreements or undertake indemnity or other obligations that may result in additional expenses for us.

As part of our disposition strategy, on May 17, 2017, we completed the sale of our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the FCCL Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets to Cenovus Energy. Consideration for the transaction included 208 million Cenovus Energy common shares. We may not be able to liquidate the shares issued to us by Cenovus Energy at prices we deem acceptable, or at all.

We do not insure against all potential losses; therefore, we could be harmed by unexpected liabilities and increased costs.

We maintain insurance against many, but not all, potential losses or liabilities arising from operating risks. As such, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to fully cover us against potential losses arising from such risks. Uninsured losses and liabilities arising from operating risks could reduce the funds available to us for capital, exploration and investment spending and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our operations present hazards and risks that require significant and continuous oversight.

The scope and nature of our operations present a variety of significant hazards and risks, including operational hazards and risks such as explosions, fires, crude oil spills, severe weather, geological events, labor disputes, terrorist attacks, sabotage, civil unrest or cyber attacks. Our operations may also be adversely affected by unavailability, interruptions or accidents involving services or infrastructure required to develop, produce, process or transport our production, such as contract labor, drilling rigs, pipelines, railcars, tankers, barges or other infrastructure. Our operations are subject to the additional hazards of pollution, releases of toxic gas and other environmental hazards and risks. Activities in deepwater areas may pose incrementally greater risks because of complex subsurface conditions such as higher reservoir pressures, water depths and metocean conditions. All such hazards could result in loss of human life, significant property and equipment damage, environmental pollution, impairment of operations, substantial losses to us and damage to our reputation. Further, our business and operations may be disrupted if we do not respond, or are perceived not to respond, in an appropriate manner to any of these hazards and risks or any other major crisis or if we are unable to efficiently restore or replace affected operational components and capacity.

Our technologies, systems and networks may be subject to cybersecurity breaches. Although we have experienced occasional, actual or attempted breaches of our cybersecurity, none of these breaches has had a material effect on our business, operations or reputation. If our systems for protecting against cybersecurity risks prove to be insufficient, we could be adversely affected by having our business systems compromised, our proprietary information altered, lost or stolen, or our business operations disrupted. As cyber attacks continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information systems and related infrastructure security vulnerabilities.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The following is a description of reportable legal proceedings, including those involving governmental authorities under federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment for this reporting period. The following proceedings include those matters that arose during the fourth quarter of 2016,2017, as well as matters previously reported in our 20152016 Form10-K and ourfirst-, second- and third-quarter 20162017 Form10-Qs that were not resolved prior to the fourth quarter of 2016.2017. Material developments to the previously reported matters have been included in the descriptions below. While it is not possible to accurately predict the final outcome of these pending proceedings, if any one or more of such proceedings were to be decided adversely to ConocoPhillips, we expect there would be no material effect on our consolidated financial position. Nevertheless, such proceedings are reported pursuant to SEC regulations.

On April 30, 2012, the separation of our downstream business was completed, creating two independent energy companies: ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66. In connection with the separation, we entered into an Indemnification and Release Agreement, which provides for cross-indemnities between Phillips 66 and us and established procedures for handling claims subject to indemnification and related matters, such as legal proceedings. We have included matters where we remain or have subsequently become a party to a proceeding relating to Phillips 66, in accordance with SEC regulations. We do not expect any of those matters to result in a net claim against us.

New Matters—ConocoPhillips

A Judgment and Consent Decree was entered on December 7, 2016, by the South Central Judicial District Court in Burleigh County, North Dakota against Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP and ConocoPhillips Company resolving alleged violations of the state’s air pollution control laws. The North Dakota Department of Health was the Plaintiff in this matter. The Consent Decree requires the companies to implement a specified program to inspect and repair as necessary its facilities in North Dakota and to pay a penalty of approximately $220,000.

Matters Previously Reported—Phillips 66

In October 2007, we received a Complaint from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) alleging violations of the Clean Water Act related to a 2006 oil spill at the Bayway Refinery and proposing a penalty of $156,000. Phillips 66 resolved this matter with the EPA in December 2016 with a settlement payment of $35,500.

In May 2012, the Illinois Attorney General’s office filed and notified ConocoPhillips of a complaint with respect to operations at the Phillips 66 WRB Wood River Refinery alleging violations of the Illinois groundwater standards and a third-party’s hazardous waste permit. The complaint seeks as relief remediation of area groundwater; compliance with the hazardous waste permit; enhanced pipeline and tank integrity measures; additional spill reporting; and yet-to-be specified amounts for fines and penalties.

New Matters—Phillips 66penalties exceeding $100,000.

In October 2016, after Phillips 66 received a Notice of Intent to Sue from the Sierra Club, Phillips 66 entered into a voluntary settlement with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for alleged violations of wastewater requirements at the Wood River Refinery occurring in part prior to the separation.Refinery. The settlement involves certain capital projects and payment of $125,000. TheAfter the settlement has beenwas filed with the Court for final approval, and the Sierra Club has sought and was granted approval to intervene in the casecase. The settlement and a first modification have been entered by the Court, but the Sierra Club still seeks to opposereopen and challenge the settlement. A court hearing is scheduled for March 2017.

 

Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

Name  Position Held  Age* 

Janet L. Carrig

  

Senior Vice President, Legal, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

   5960 

Ellen R. DeSanctis

  

Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications

   6061 

Matt J. Fox

  

Executive Vice President, Strategy, Exploration and Technology

   5657 

Alan J. Hirshberg

  

Executive Vice President, Production, Drilling and Projects

   5556 

Ryan M. Lance

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer

   5455 

Andrew D. Lundquist

  

Senior Vice President, Government Affairs

   5657 

James D. McMorran

  

Vice President, Human Resources, Real Estate and Facilities Services

   5960 

Glenda M. Schwarz

  

Vice President and Controller

   5152 

Don E. Wallette, Jr.

  

Executive Vice President, Finance, Commercial and Chief Financial Officer

   5859 

 

*On February 15, 2017.2018.

There are no family relationships among any of the officers named above. Each officer of the company is elected by the Board of Directors at its first meeting after the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and thereafter as appropriate. Each officer of the company holds office from the date of election until the first meeting of the directors held after the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until a successor is elected. The date of the next annual meeting is May 16, 2017.15, 2018. Set forth below is information about the executive officers.

Janet L. Carrigwas appointed Senior Vice President, Legal, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in 2007. On February 14, 2018, Ms. Carrig announced her decision to retire as Senior Vice President, Legal, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Ms. Carrig plans to remain in her current position until her successor is appointed.

Ellen R. DeSanctis was appointed Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications in May 2012. She was previously employed by Petrohawk Energy Corp. and served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications since 2010. Prior to that she was employed by Rosetta Resources Inc. and served as Executive Vice President of Strategy and Development from 2008 to 2010.

Matt J. Fox was appointed as Executive Vice President, Strategy, Exploration and Technology in April 2016. He previously served as the Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production, from 2012 to 2016. Prior to that, he was employed by Nexen, Inc. and served as Executive Vice President, International since 2010.

Alan J. Hirshberg was appointed Executive Vice President, Production, Drilling and Projects in April 2016. He previously served as Executive Vice President, Technology and Projects, from 2012 to 2016. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, Planning and Strategy since 2010.

Ryan M. Lancewas appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer in May 2012, having previously served as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production—International since May 2009.

Andrew D. Lundquistwas appointed Senior Vice President, Government Affairs in 2013. Prior to that, he served as managing partner of BlueWater Strategies LLC, since 2002.

James D. McMorran was appointed Vice President, Human Resources, Real Estate and Facilities Services in August 2015. Prior to that, he served as Manager, Compensation and Benefits, since 2004.

Glenda M. Schwarzwas appointed Vice President and Controller in 2009.

Don E. Wallette, Jr. was appointed Executive Vice President, Finance, Commercial and Chief Financial Officer in April 2016. He previously served as Executive Vice President, Commercial, Business Development and Corporate Planning from 2012 to 2016. Prior to that, he served as President, Asia Pacific since 2010 and President, Russia/Caspian from 2006 to 2010.

PART II

 

Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Quarterly Common Stock Prices and Cash Dividends Per Share

ConocoPhillips’ common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, under the symbol “COP.”

 

   Stock Price     Stock Price   
  

 

 

     

 

 

   
   High            Low        Dividends 
  

 

 

   

 

 

2017

      

First

  $            51.68    43.26    0.265 

Second

   50.62    43.02    0.265 

Third

   50.83    42.27    0.265 

Fourth

   56.37    48.70    0.265 
   High             Low         Dividends  

 
  

 

 

   

 

 

2016

            

First

  $            47.77     31.05     0.25    $47.77    31.05    0.25 

Second

   49.35     38.19     0.25     49.35    38.19    0.25 

Third

   44.42     38.80     0.25     44.42    38.80    0.25 

Fourth

   53.17     40.37     0.25     53.17    40.37    0.25 

 

 

2015

      

First

  $70.11     60.57     0.73  

Second

   69.72     60.86     0.73  

Third

   61.51     41.10     0.74  

Fourth

   57.24     44.56     0.74  

Closing Stock Price at December 31, 2017

      $54.89 

Closing Stock Price at January 31, 2018

      $58.46 

Number of Stockholders of Record at January 31, 2018*

       46,680 

 

 

Closing Stock Price at December 31, 2016

      $50.14  

Closing Stock Price at January 31, 2017

      $48.76  

Number of Stockholders of Record at January 31, 2017*

       49,845  

 
*Indetermining the number of stockholders, we consider clearing agencies and security position listings as one stockholder for each agency listing.

The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors, and may be affected by various factors, including our future earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, levels of indebtedness, credit ratings and other considerations our Board of Directors deems relevant. Our Board of Directors has adopted a quarterly dividend declaration policy providing that the declaration of any dividends will be determined quarterly by the Board of Directors taking into account such factors as our business model, prevailing business conditions and our financial results and capital requirements, without a predetermined annual net income payout ratio.

On February 4, 2016, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a reduction in the quarterly dividend to $0.25 per share, compared with the previous quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share.

On January 31, 2017, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.265 per share, compared with the previous quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share.

On February 1, 2018, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.285 per share, compared with the previous quarterly dividend of $0.265 per share.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

        Millions of Dollars  
       

 

 

 

Period

   
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
  
  
 
 
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
  
  
  
  
   
 

 
 
 

Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares

that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs

  
  

  
  
  

 

 

October 1-31, 2016

   -     $-       -      $-    

November 1-30, 2016

   695,393      45.30       695,393       2,969    

December 1-31, 2016

   1,883,705      50.16       1,883,705       2,874    

 

 

Total fourth-quarter 2016

   2,579,098     $48.85       2,579,098      

 

 
        Millions of Dollars  
       

 

 

 

Period

   

Total Number of

Shares Purchased

 

  

Average

Price Paid

Per Share

 

 

 

   

Shares Purchased

as Part of Publicly

Announced Plans

or Programs

 

 

 

 

   

Approximate Dollar 

Value of Shares 

that May Yet Be 

Purchased Under the 

Plans or Programs 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October1-31, 2017

   6,678,455    $49.94      6,678,455     $3,496  

November1-30, 2017

   6,180,482     51.51      6,180,482      3,177  

December1-31, 2017

   5,773,183     52.52      5,773,183      2,874  

 

 

Total fourth-quarter 2017

   18,632,120    $51.26      18,632,120     $2,874  

 

 

*There were no repurchases of common stock from company employees in connection with the company’s broad-based employee incentive plans.

On November 10, 2016, we announced plans to purchase up to $3 billion of our common stock overthrough 2019. On March 29, 2017, we announced plans to double our share repurchase program to $6 billion of common stock through 2019, with $3 billion allocated and purchased in 2017, and the next three years. Repurchaseremainder allocated evenly to 2018 and 2019. On February 1, 2018, we announced the acceleration of shares beganour previously stated 2018 share repurchases from $1.5 billion to $2.0 billion, with the remaining balance to be repurchased in November and totaled 2,579,098 shares at a cost of $126 million, through December 31, 2016.2019. Acquisitions for the share repurchase program are made at management’s discretion, at prevailing prices, subject to market conditions and other factors. Repurchases may be increased, decreased or discontinued at any time without prior notice. Shares of stock repurchased under the plan are held as treasury shares.

In addition to our previously announced share repurchase program above, we are currently planning to purchase up to an additional $1.5 billion of our common stock through 2020. Whether we undertake these additional repurchases is ultimately subject to numerous considerations, including Board authorization, market conditions and other factors. See Risk Factors “Our ability to declare and pay dividends and repurchase shares is subject to certain considerations.”

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph shows the cumulative total shareholder return (TSR) for ConocoPhillips’ common stock in each of the five years from December 31, 2011,2012, to December 31, 2016.2017. The graph also compares the cumulative total returns for the same five-year period with the S&P 500 Index theand our performance peer group used in the prior fiscal year (the “Prior Peer Group”) and a new performance peer group for the current fiscal year (the “New Peer Group”). The Prior Peer Group consistedconsisting of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, Anadarko, Apache, BG Group plc,Marathon Oil Corporation, Devon and Occidental, weighted according to the respective peer’s stock market capitalization at the beginning of each annual period. The New Peer Group excludes BG Group plc due to its acquisition by Royal Dutch Shell in 2016 and includes Marathon Oil Corporation. The Prior Peer Group is presented for purposes of comparison. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2011,2012, in ConocoPhillips stock, the S&P 500 Index the Prior Peer Group and New Peer GroupConocoPhillips’ peer group and assumes that all dividends were reinvested. The spinoff of Phillips 66 in 2012 is treated as a special dividend for the purposes of calculating TSR for ConocoPhillips. The market value of the distributed shares on the spinoff date was deemed reinvested in shares of ConocoPhillips common stock.

 

  *Prior Peer Group: BP; Chevron; ExxonMobil; Royal Dutch Shell; Total; Anadarko; Apache; BG Group plc; Devon; Occidental.

**New Peer Group: BP; Chevron; ExxonMobil; Royal Dutch Shell; Total; Anadarko; Apache; Marathon Oil Corporation; Devon; Occidental.

Item 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

   Millions of Dollars Except Per Share Amounts     Millions of Dollars Except Per Share Amounts 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016   2015   2014     2013     2012     2017  2016  2015  2014    2013 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sales and other operating revenues

  $23,693   29,564   52,524     54,413     57,967    $29,106  23,693  29,564  52,524    54,413 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (3,559 (4,371 5,807     8,037     7,481     (793 (3,559 (4,371 5,807    8,037 

Per common share

               

Basic

   (2.91 (3.58 4.63     6.47     5.95     (0.70 (2.91 (3.58 4.63    6.47 

Diluted

   (2.91 (3.58 4.60     6.43     5.91     (0.70 (2.91 (3.58 4.60    6.43 

Income from discontinued operations

   -    -   1,131     1,178     1,017     -   -   -  1,131    1,178 

Net income (loss)

   (3,559 (4,371 6,938     9,215     8,498     (793 (3,559 (4,371 6,938    9,215 

Net income (loss) attributable to ConocoPhillips

   (3,615 (4,428 6,869     9,156     8,428     (855 (3,615 (4,428 6,869    9,156 

Per common share

               

Basic

   (2.91 (3.58 5.54     7.43     6.77     (0.70 (2.91 (3.58 5.54    7.43 

Diluted

   (2.91 (3.58 5.51     7.38     6.72     (0.70 (2.91 (3.58 5.51    7.38 

Total assets

   89,772   97,484   116,539     118,057     117,144     73,362  89,772  97,484  116,539    118,057 

Long-term debt

   26,186   23,453   22,383     21,073     20,770     17,128  26,186  23,453  22,383    21,073 

Joint venture acquisition obligation—long-term

   -    -    -     -     2,810  

Cash dividends declared per common share

   1.00   2.94   2.84     2.70     2.64  

Joint venture acquisition obligation—Cash dividends declared per common share

   1.06  1.00  2.94  2.84    2.70 

 

 

Net income (loss) and Netnet income (loss) attributable to ConocoPhillips from 20122013 to 2014 includes income from discontinued operations as a result of the separation of the downstream business, the sale of our interest in Kashagan, and the sales of our Algeria and Nigeria businesses. These factors impact the comparability of this information. For additional information on the sale of our Nigeria business, see Note 3—Discontinued Operations, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of factors that will enhance an understanding of this data.

Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis is the company’s analysis of its financial performance and of significant trends that may affect future performance. It should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes, and supplemental oil and gas disclosures included elsewhere in this report. It contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements relating to the company’s plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions that are made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to update, revise or correct any of the forward-looking information unless required to do so under the federal securities laws. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with the company’s disclosures under the heading: “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ‘SAFE HARBOR’ PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995,” beginning on page 72.70.

Due to discontinued operations reporting, we believe income (loss) from continuing operations is more representative of ConocoPhillips’ earnings than overall net income (loss) attributable to ConocoPhillips. The terms “earnings” and “loss” as used in Management’s Discussion and Analysis refer to net income (loss) from continuing operations. For additional information, see Note3—Discontinued Operations, in the Notesattributable to Consolidated Financial Statements.ConocoPhillips.

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

ConocoPhillips is the world’s largest independent exploration and production (E&P) company, based on proved reserves and production of liquids and natural gas. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, we have operations and activities in 17 countries. Our diverse portfolio primarily includes resource-rich North American unconventional assetstight oil and oil sands assets in Canada; lower-risk conventional assets in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia; several liquefied natural gas (LNG) developments; and an inventory of global conventional and unconventional exploration prospects. At December 31, 2016,2017, we employed approximately 13,30011,400 people worldwide and had total assets of $90$73 billion. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “COP.”

Overview

The energy landscape remained challenged throughout 2016. Global production oversupply caused continued weaknessglobal oil market is rebalancing. Crude oil prices improved in commodity2017, particularly during the latter half of the year; however, we believe prices in 2016 following a year of weak prices in 2015. Ongoing uncertainty around the timing and trajectory of a price recovery, coupled with tightening credit capacity across the industry, caused usare likely to take actions earlyremain cyclical in the year to mitigate the impacts of possible prolonged weak prices. We reduced our quarterly dividend by 66 percent, to $0.25 per share, issued $3.0 billion of long-term debt, obtained a $1.6 billion three-year term loan, reduced capital expenditures and production and operating expenses, and further streamlined our portfolio.

Our capital expenditures in 2016 were $4.9 billion, a 52 percent reduction compared with 2015 and a 72 percent reduction compared with 2014. Production and operating expenses in 2016 were $5.7 billion, down 19 percent compared with 2015 and down 36 percent compared with 2014.

We also progressed our efforts to high-grade our portfolio.future. In 2016, we generated $1.3 billion from the disposition of certain non-core assets in our portfolio, including the offshore South Natuna Sea Block B in Indonesia and ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V., the entity that held our interest in three exploration blocks offshore Senegal. The full-year 2016 production impact of completed dispositions was 27 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBOED).

During 2016, we expandedupdated our value proposition to position the company for long-term success, in light ofgiven our view that commodity prices, specifically oil prices, are likely to remain lower and be more volatile in the future.expectations. Our value proposition principles, namely to maintain a strong balance sheet,financial strength, grow our dividenddistributions and pursue disciplined growth, remain essentially unchanged. However, we took steps to improve our competitiveness and resilience by establishing clear priorities for allocating future cash flows.allocation.

In order, thesethe cash allocation priorities are: invest capital at a level that maintains flat production volumes and pays our existing dividend; grow our existing dividend; reduce debt to a level we believe is sufficient to maintain a strong investment grade rating through price cycles; repurchase shares;shares to provide value to our shareholders; and strategically invest capital to grow absolute production. We outlined aour cash from operations.

In 2017, we took significant actions that allowed us to 2019 operating plan that achieves these priorities at Brent prices at or above $50 per barrel with asset sales of $5 billion to $8 billion.

make substantial progress on our stated priorities. We believe we have taken prudent actionsthat our commitment to our value proposition, as evidenced by the results discussed below, position the company for success in an environment of price uncertainty and ongoing volatility, while accomplishing significant milestones in a challenged business environment throughout 2016.volatility.

Key Operating and Financial Summary

Significant items during 20162017 included the following:

 

Achieved full-year production excluding Libya of 1,567 MBOED;1,356 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBOED); underlying production excluding the impact of closed and planned dispositions grew 19 percent on a production per debt-adjusted share basis and 3 percent production growth adjusted for downtimeoverall.
Cash provided by operating activities exceeded capital expenditures by $2.5 billion, and exceeded capital expenditures and dividends by $1.2 billion.
Paid down $7.6 billion of balance sheet debt, ending the year with debt of $19.7 billion.
Generated approximately $16 billion from asset dispositions.
Capital expendituresAnnouncedyear-end proved reserves of $4.95.0 billion a more than 50 percent reduction compared with 2015.barrels of oil equivalent (BOE).
Reduced production and operating expensesRepurchased $3 billion of shares; reduced ending share count by 195 percent year over year.
Achieved project startupsReached settlement on Ecuador arbitration for $337 million.

Operationally, we continue to focus on safely executing our capital program and remaining attentive to our costs. Production excluding Libya was 1,356 MBOED in 2017 compared with 1,567 MBOED in 2016. Our underlying production, which excludes the full-year impact of closed and planned dispositions of 191 MBOED in 2017 and 434 MBOED in 2016 and Libya, increased 32 MBOED, or 3 percent year over year. Underlying production on a per debt-adjusted share basis grew by 19 percent compared to 2016. Production per debt-adjusted share is calculated on an underlying production basis using ending period debt divided by ending share price plus ending shares outstanding. We believe production per debt-adjusted share is useful to investors as it provides a consistent view of production on a total equity basis by converting debt to equity and allows for comparisons across peer companies.

We accomplished several strategic milestones in 2017, including progressing our efforts to optimize our portfolio. Our asset dispositions are in line with our strategy, announced in November 2016, to focus on lowcost-of-supply projects in our portfolio that strategically fit our development plans. We generated approximately $16 billion in total consideration from the disposition of certain noncore assets which were directed to our stated cash priorities and general corporate purposes. For additional information on our dispositions, see Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2017, we reduced debt by $7.6 billion to $19.7 billion at APLNG Train 2year-end and repurchased 64 million shares of our common stock totaling $3 billion. Consistent with our commitment to grow our distributions, in Australia, Foster Creek Phase Gthe first quarter of 2017, we increased our quarterly dividend by 6 percent to $0.265 per share. We are managing our business to optimize and Christina Lake Phase Fdeliver on our value propositions and cash priorities in Canada, Alder in Europe, Malikai in Malaysia, and Bohai wellhead platform J in China.

Significant discovery at Willow prospect in Alaska.
Generated proceeds of $1.3 billion from asset dispositions.
Announced preliminary year-end proved reserves of 6.4 billion BOE.
Initiated $3 billion share buyback program in mid-November.
a demanding business environment.

Business Environment

Global oil market conditions in 2016 were challenging as the excess of supply relative to global demand led to another year of global inventory builds. Global oil prices experiencedAfter elevated levels of volatility throughoutin 2016, with first quarter Brent crudeglobal market fundamentals trended towards a firmer balance in 2017. Crude oil prices reachingimproved in 2017 as a 10-year quarterly average lowresult of $33.89 per barrel. Prices recovered slightlyslower growth in the secondglobal oil production, strong global oil demand and third quarters of 2016 as production growth slowed while demand continued to increase. In the fourth quarter, prices continued to trend higher, with Brent crude oil averaging $49.46 per barrel, as OPEC members and key non-OPEC producers agreed to cut production in 2017.lower global inventory levels.

The energy industry has periodically experienced this type of extreme volatility due to fluctuatingsupply-and-demand conditions. Commodity prices are the most significant factor impacting our profitability and related reinvestment of operating cash flows into our business. Among other dynamics that could influence world energy markets and commodity prices are global economic health, supply disruptions or fears thereof caused by civil unrest or military conflicts, actions taken by OPEC, environmental laws, tax regulations, governmental policies and weather-related disruptions. North America’s energy landscape has been transformed from resource scarcity to an abundance of supply, primarily due to advances in technology responsible for the rapid growth of tight oil production, successful exploration and rising production from the Canadian oil sands. Our strategy is to create value through price cycles by delivering on the disciplined financial and operational priorities that underpin our value proposition.

Financial Priorities

The financial priorities we believe will drive our success through the price cycles include:

 

 Focus on financial returns. This is a core aspect of our value proposition. Our goal is to achieve strong financial returns by controlling our costs, exercising capital discipline and continually optimizing our portfolio.

¡ Control costs and expenses. Controlling operating and overhead costs, without compromising safety and environmental stewardship, is a high priority. We monitor these costs using various methodologies that are reported to senior management monthly, on both an absolute-dollar basis and aper-unit basis. Managing operating and overhead costs is critical to maintaining a competitive position in our industry, particularly in a low commodity price environment. The ability to control our operating and overhead costs impacts our ability to deliver strong cash from operations. In 2017, including asset disposition impacts, we reduced our production and operating expenses by 9 percent as compared to 2016.

 

 Maintain a strong balance sheet. We believe financial strength is critical in a cyclical business such as ours. In early 2016, ongoing uncertainty around the timing of a price recovery, coupled with tightening credit capacity across the industry, caused us to take actions to preserve our balance sheet strength and mitigate the impacts of possible weak prices in 2016 and 2017. During the first quarter of 2016, we reduced our quarterly dividend and issued additional debt to secure liquidity. Realized commodity prices improved subsequent to the first quarter of 2016, and we paid down approximately $2.3 billion of debt during the second half of the year. In November 2016, we announced our plan to reduce debt to $20 billion by year-end 2019. We expect to retire outstanding debt as it matures and exercise flexibility in paying down our term loan, which is due in 2019.

Return capital to shareholders. In 2016, we paid dividends on our common stock of $1.3 billion. We believe in delivering value to our shareholders through the price cycles. As a result, we have set a priority to increase our dividend rate annually and purchase up to $3 billion of our common stock over the next three years. We began repurchasing shares in November 2016, and in January 2017, we announced a 6 percent increase to our quarterly dividend, from $0.25 per share to $0.265 per share.

Focus on financial returns. This is a core aspect of our value proposition. Our goal is to achieve strong financial returns by controlling our costs, high-grading our portfolio, shifting our production mix, and exercising capital discipline.

Operational Priorities

The operational priorities we must manage well to be successful include:

¡ Maintain capital discipline. We participate in a commodity price-driven and capital-intensive industry, with varying lead times from when an investment decision is made to the time an asset is operational and generates cash flow. As a result, we must invest significant capital dollars to explore for new oil and gas fields, develop newly discovered fields, maintain existing fields, and construct pipelines and LNG facilities. Given our view of greater price volatility, we have shifted our capital allocation to focus on value-preserving, shorter cycle time, and lowcost-of-supply, unconventional programs in our resource base. Our cash allocation priorities call for the investment of sufficient capital to maintain production and pay the existing dividend. Additional allocations of capital toward absolute growth projects will be dependent on satisfaction of other financial priorities. We use a disciplined approach, focused on value maximization and cash flow expansion, to set our capital plans.

In November 2016,2017, we announced a 20172018 capital budget of $5 billion.$5.5 billion, including $3.5 billion of sustaining capital and $2 billion in accretive, short-cycle unconventional programs, future major projects and exploration activities.

 

 ¡ Optimize our portfolio. We continue to optimize our asset portfolio by focusing on lowcost-of-supply assets which strategically fit our development plans. In the third quarter2017, we generated approximately $16 billion in total consideration from dispositions of 2015, we announced plans to reduce future capital spendingcertain noncore assets in our deepwater exploration program. Subsequently,portfolio, including our 50 percent nonoperated interest in 2016, we soldthe FCCL Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets; our interests in several exploration areas, including offshore Senegal,the San Juan Basin; and terminated our final Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract. Additionally, during the year, we sold our 40 percent working interest in the offshore South Natuna Sea Block B Production Sharing Contract (PSC) in Indonesia and our 30 percent interest in an exploration license offshore Newfoundland. We generated approximately $1.3 billion in proceeds from non-core asset dispositions in 2016.

In November 2016, we announced our plan to divest between $5 billion and $8 billion of assets, primarily associated with North American natural gas, over the next two years. Proceeds from the sale of assets will be directed toward the achievement of our financial priorities.Panhandle assets. We will continue to evaluate our assets to determine whether they fit our strategic direction and will optimize the portfolio as necessary, directing our capital investments to areas that align with our objectives.

Maintain financial strength. We believe financial strength is critical in a cyclical business such as ours. In 2017, using proceeds from asset dispositions and cash flow from operations, we reduced our debt by $7.6 billion to $19.7 billion atyear-end. On a longer-term basis, in November 2017, we announced our plan to reduce debt to $15 billion byyear-end 2019, a significant acceleration from the previously stated expectation of $20 billion in the same timeframe. We expect to retire outstanding debt as it matures and exercise flexibility in paying down our other debt instruments.

Return capital to shareholders. In 2017, we paid dividends on our common stock of $1.3 billion and repurchased $3 billion of our common stock. We believe in delivering value to our shareholders through the price cycles. As a result, we set a priority to increase our dividend rate annually and purchase up to approximately $3 billion of our common stock evenly from 2018 through 2019.

On February 1, 2018, we announced that our Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.285 per share, compared with the previous quarterly dividend of $0.265 per share. Additionally, we announced the acceleration of our previously stated 2018 share repurchases from $1.5 billion to $2.0 billion.

In addition to our previously announced share repurchase program above, we are currently planning to purchase up to an additional $1.5 billion of our common stock through 2020. Whether we undertake these additional repurchases is ultimately subject to numerous considerations, including Board authorization, market conditions and other factors. See Risk Factors “Our ability to declare and pay dividends and repurchase shares is subject to certain considerations.”

 

  Maintain a relentless focus on safety and environmental stewardship. Safety and environmental stewardship, including the operating integrity of our assets, remain our highest priorities, and we are committed to protecting the health and safety of everyone who has a role in our operations and the communities in which we operate. We strive to conduct our business with respect and care for both the local and global environment and systematically manage risk to drive sustainable business growth. Our sustainability efforts in 20162017 focused on updatingimplementing our action plans for climate change, biodiversity, water and human rights, as well as revamping public reporting to be more informative, searchable and responsive to common questions. To demonstrate our commitment to sustainability and environmental stewardship, on November 2017, we announced our intention to target a 5 to 15 percent reduction in our greenhouse gas emission intensity by 2030. We are committed to building a learning organization using human performance principles as we relentlessly pursue improved Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) and operational performance.

 

  Add to our proved reserve base. We primarily add to our proved reserve base in two ways:

 

 ¡  Successful exploration, exploitation and development of new and existing fields.
 ¡  Application of new technologies and processes to improve recovery from existing fields.

Proved reserve estimates require economic production based on historical12-month,first-of-month, average prices and current costs. Therefore, our proved reserves generally increase as prices rise and decrease as prices decline and increase as prices rise. Additionally, as we continue cash conservation efforts,decline. Asset dispositions in 2017 reduced our reportedyear-end proved reserves, but were partly offset by increased commodity prices. In 2017, our reserve replacement, efforts could be delayed thus limiting our ability to replace depleted reserves. Low commodity prices and reduced capital expenditures in 2016 adversely affected our reported year-end proved reserves. In 2016, ourwhich included a reduction of 1.9 billion BOE from dispositions, was negative 168 percent. Our organic reserve replacement, which excludes the impact of sales and purchases, was negative 194 percent.200 percent in 2017. In the five years ended December 31, 2016,2017, our reserve replacement was 35 percent. We expect our proved reserves to increase if prices rise.negative 24 percent, reflecting the impact of asset dispositions and lower prices.

Access to additional resources may become increasingly difficult as commodity prices can make projects uneconomic or unattractive. In addition, prohibition of direct investment in some nations, national fiscal terms, political instability, competition from national oil companies, and lack of access to high-potential areas due to environmental or other regulation may negatively impact our ability to increase our reserve base. As such, the timing and level at which we add to our reserve base may, or may not, allow us to replace our production over subsequent years. Additionally, as we continue cash conservation efforts, our reserve replacement efforts could be delayed thus limiting our ability to replace depleted reserves.

 

  Apply technical capability. We leverage our knowledge and technology to create value and safely deliver on our plans. Technical strength is part of our heritage, and we are evolving our technical approach to optimally apply best practices. Companywide, we continue to evaluate potential solutions to leverage knowledge of technological successes across our operations. Such innovations enable us to economically convert additional resources to reserves, achieve greater operating efficiencies and reduce our environmental impact.

 

  Develop and retain a talented work force. We strive to attract, train, develop and retain individuals with the knowledge and skills to implement our business strategy and who support our values and ethics. To this end, we offer university internships across multiple disciplines to attract the best talent and, as needed, recruit experienced hires to maintain a broad range of skills and experience. We promote continued learning, development and technical training through structured development programs designed to enhance the technical and functional skills of our employees.

Other Factors Affecting Profitability

Other significant factors that can affect our profitability include:

 

  CommodityEnergy commodity prices. Our earnings and operating cash flows generally correlate with industry price levels for crude oil and natural gas, the prices of whichgas. Industry price levels are subject to factors external to the company and over which we have no control.control, including but not limited to global economic health, supply disruptions or fears thereof caused by civil unrest or military conflicts, actions taken by Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), environmental laws, tax regulations, governmental policies and weather-related disruptions. The following graph depicts the average benchmark prices for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, Dated Brent crude oil and U.S. Henry Hub natural gas:

 

Brent crude oil prices averaged $61.39 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2017, an increase of 24 percent compared with $49.46 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2016, an increase of2016. Similarly, WTI crude oil prices increased 13 percent compared with $43.67from $49.18 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2015. Similarly, WTI crude oil prices increased 17 percent from $42.10 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 20152016 to $49.18$55.35 per barrel in the same period of 2016.

Despite the fourth quarter increase, crude2017. Global oil prices were under pressure throughoutbegan to improve at the end of 2016 dueand continued trending upward in response to a continuedstronger global demand and slower production increase that outpaced demand growth, leading to a large observed rise in global inventory. The average Brent crude oil price decreased 17 percent, from $52.46 per barrel in 2015 to $43.69 per barrel in 2016.growth.

Henry Hub natural gas prices averaged $2.98$2.93 per million British thermal units (MMBTU) in the fourth quarter of 2016, an increase2017, a decrease of 312 percent compared with $2.27$2.98 per MMBTU in the fourth quarter of 2015. Natural gas prices increased in the fourth quarter due to growth in demand, coupled with declining production.

On average,2016. However, on an annual basis, Henry Hub natural gas prices decreased 8improved 26 percent from $2.67 per MMBTU in 2015 to $2.46 per MMBTU in 2016, mainly due to strong production levels$3.11 per MMBTU in 2017. The price improvement was as a result of growth in domestic demand, increased exports and a warmer-than expected winter reducing demand below expectations. In 2016,lower U.S. underground gas storage inventories reached their highest levels in five years.inventories.

Our realized natural gas liquids prices averaged $21.82$32.79 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2016,2017, an increase of 3350 percent compared with $16.42$21.82 per barrel in the same quarter of 2015.2016.

Similar to natural gas and crude oil, our natural gas liquids prices also declined on average in 2016. Our average realized natural gas liquids prices decreased 6 percent, from $17.79 per barrel in 2015 to $16.68 per barrel in 2016, as the expansion in tight oil production boosted supplies of natural gas liquids, resulting in continued downward pressure on natural gas liquids prices in the United States.

DecliningImproving global crude oil prices resulted in the Western Canada Select benchmark price experiencing a 1733 percent decline,increase, from $35.21 per barrel in 2015 to $29.36 per barrel in 2016. Consequently,2016 to $38.92 per barrel in 2017. The WCS benchmark price improvement, coupled with changes in costs per barrel resulting from the disposition of our interest in the FCCL Partnership, caused our realized bitumen price experienced a decreaseto increase relative to 2015 price levels.2016. Our realized bitumen price was $15.27$22.66 per barrel in 2016, a decrease2017, an increase of 1848 percent compared with $18.72$15.27 per barrel in the same period of 2015.2016.

Our worldwide annual average realized price was $28.35$46.10 per barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) in 2016, a decreasethe fourth quarter of 172017, an increase of 40 percent compared with $34.34$32.93 per BOE in 2015. The reductionthe fourth quarter of 2016. Similarly, our worldwide annual average realized price was $39.19 per BOE in the prices reflects lower2017, an increase of 38 percent compared with $28.35 per BOE in 2016, reflecting higher average realized prices across all commodities.

North America’s energy landscape has been transformed from resource scarcity to an abundance of supply. In recent years, the use of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling in tight oil formations has led to increased industry actual and forecasted crude oil and natural gas production in the United States. Although providing significant short- and long-term growth opportunities for our company, the increased abundance of crude oil and natural gas due to development of tight oil plays could also have adverse financial implications to us, including: an extended period of low commodity prices; production curtailments; delay of plans to develop areas such as unconventional fields or Alaska North Slope natural gas fields; and underutilization of LNG regasification facilities. Should one or more of these events occur, our revenues would be reduced and additional asset impairments might be possible.

 

  Impairments. As mentioned above,earlier, we participate in a capital-intensive industry. At times, our properties, plants and equipment and investments become impaired when, for example, commodity prices decline significantly for long periods of time, our reserve estimates are revised downward, or a decision to dispose of an asset leads to a write-down to its fair value. We may also invest large amounts of money in exploration which, if exploratory drilling proves unsuccessful, could lead to a material impairment of leasehold values. In 2016,2017, we recordedbefore-tax impairments of $139$6,601 million for proved properties and $466$136 million for unproved properties. As we optimize our assets in the future, it is reasonably possible we may incur future losses upon sale or impairment charges to long-lived assets used in operations, investments in nonconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method, and unproved properties. For additional information on our impairments in 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014,2015, see Note 9—8—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

  Effective tax rate. Our operations are located in countries with different tax rates and fiscal structures. Accordingly, even in a stable commodity price and fiscal/regulatory environment, our overall effective tax rate can vary significantly between periods based on the “mix” ofbefore-tax earnings within our global operations. Recent changes in the U.S. corporate income tax law, further discussed below, additionally impacted our effective tax rate in 2017.

 

  Fiscal and regulatory environmentenvironment.. Our operations can be affected by changing economic, regulatory and political environments in the various countries in which we operate, including the United States. Civil unrest or strained relationships with governments may impact our operations or investments. These changing environments have generally negatively impacted our results of operations, and further changes to government fiscal take could have a negative impact on future operations. Our assets in Venezuela were expropriated in 2007. Our production operations in Libya and related oil exports were suspended or significantly curtailed from July 2013 to October 2016 due to the closure of the Es Sider crude oil export terminal, and they were also suspended in 2011 during Libya’s period of civil unrest. In 2016, the United Kingdom government enacted tax legislation which reduced our U.K. corporate tax rate by 10 percent. Our assets in Venezuela and Ecuador were expropriated in 2007 and 2009, respectively. Our management carefully considers these events when evaluating projects or determining the level of activity in such countries.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Legislation”) was enacted, significantly revising the U.S. corporate income tax law by, among other things, lowering the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, implementing a territorial tax system and imposing aone-time deemed repatriation tax on untaxed accumulated foreign earnings. We recognized a provisional, noncash tax benefit of $852 million, which is included as a component of our 2017 income tax expense, primarily related to the revaluation of deferred taxes at the lower 21 percent federal statutory rate. We did not incur nor expect to incur a tax cost related to theone-time repatriation of accumulated foreign earnings. While we anticipate the Tax Legislation will provide a positive impact

to our U.S. operations in the future primarily because of the reduced U.S. federal statutory rate, we do not expect to realize cash tax benefits from the Tax Legislation until we move into a U.S. tax paying position. The ultimate impact of the Tax Legislation may differ from our current expectations, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations and assumptions the company has made or additional regulatory or accounting guidance that may be issued with respect to the Tax Legislation. For additional information, see Note 18—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our management carefully considers the fiscal and regulatory environment when evaluating projects or determining the levels and locations of our activity.

Outlook

Full-year 20172018 production is expected to be 1,5401,195 to 1,5701,235 MBOED. This results in flat to 2approximately 5 percent growth compared with full-year 20162017 underlying production, which excludes the impact of 1,540 MBOED when adjusted for 2016closed and planned dispositions of 27191 MBOED. First-quarter 20172018 production is expected to be 1,5401,180 to 1,5801,220 MBOED. Production guidance for 20172018 excludes Libya and the impact of future dispositions.Libya.

Marketing Activities

In line with our strategic objectives, we are currently marketing certain non-core assets primarily associated with North American natural gas. We expect to generate $5 billion to $8 billion in proceeds over the next two years from asset sales.

Operating Segments

We manage our operations through six operating segments, which are primarily defined by geographic region: Alaska, Lower 48, Canada, Europe and North Africa, Asia Pacific and Middle East, and Other International.

Corporate and Other represents costs not directly associated with an operating segment, such as most interest expense, premiums incurred on the early retirement of debt, corporate overhead, certain technology activities, as well as licensing revenues received.

Our key performance indicators, shown in the statistical tables provided at the beginning of the operating segment sections that follow, reflect results from our continuing operations, including commodity prices and production.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Results

A summary of the company’s income (loss) from continuing operationsnet loss attributable to ConocoPhillips by business segment follows:

 

              Millions of Dollars                           Millions of Dollars             
Years Ended December 31              2016             2015             2014               2017             2016             2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Alaska

  $319   4   2,041    $1,466  319  4 

Lower 48

   (2,257 (1,932 (22   (2,371 (2,257 (1,932

Canada

   (935 (1,044 940     2,564  (935 (1,044

Europe and North Africa

   394   409   814     553  394  409 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   265   (406 3,008     (1,098 209  (463

Other International

   (16 (593 (100   167  (16 (593

Corporate and Other

   (1,329 (809 (874   (2,136 (1,329 (809

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $(3,559 (4,371 5,807  

Net loss attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(855 (3,615 (4,428

 

 

2017 vs. 2016

Loss attributable to ConocoPhillips decreased $2,760 million in 2017. The decrease was mainly due to:

Higher commodity prices.
Lower depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) expense, mainly due to lowerunit-of-production rates from reserve revisions and disposition impacts.
Higher gains on dispositions, primarily due to a $1.6 billionafter-tax gain in 2017 on the sale of certain Canadian assets.
Recognition of deferred tax benefits totaling $996 million, primarily related to the disposition of certain Canadian assets.
Recognition of deferred tax benefits totaling $852 million related to the Tax Legislation enacted on December 22, 2017.
Improved equity earnings, mainly due to higher realized prices, lower DD&A from asset disposition impacts, and the absence of a 2016 deferred tax charge of $174 million resulting from the change of the tax functional currency for APLNG to the U.S. dollar. These increases were partly offset by lower volumes from the disposition of our interest in the FCCL Partnership.
Lower exploration expenses mainly due to reduced leasehold impairment expense, dry hole costs and other exploration expenses.
A $337 million award from an arbitration settlement with The Republic of Ecuador.
Lower production and operating expenses, primarily due to asset disposition impacts.
Lower net interest expense, primarily due to impacts from the fair market value method of apportioning interest expense in the United States and reduced debt.

The reduction in loss was partly offset by:

Higher proved property and equity investment impairments, including a combined $2.5 billionafter-tax impairment related to the sale of our interests in the San Juan Basin and the ongoing marketing of the Barnett, as well as a $2.4 billion before- andafter-tax impairment of our equity investment in APLNG.
Lower volumes primarily due to asset dispositions in our Lower 48, Asia Pacific and Middle East, and Canada segments, as well as normal field decline.
A $238 millionafter-tax charge associated with our early retirements of debt in 2017.

2016 vs. 2015

Losses forLoss attributable to ConocoPhillips decreased 19 percent$813 million in 2016. The decrease was mainly due to:

 

Lower exploration expenses. Exploration expenses decreased mainly due to reduced leasehold impairment expense and dry hole costs.
Lower proved property and equity investment impairments, including the absence of a $1.5 billion before- andafter-tax impairment of our equity investment in Australia Pacific LNG Pty Ltd (APLNG)APLNG in 2015.
Lower production and operating expenses.
A $161 million net deferred tax benefit resulting from a reduction in the U.K. tax rate, which was enacted in September 2016 and effective January 1, 2016.
The absence of a $129 million deferred tax charge from increased corporate tax rates in Canada in 2015.

The decrease in lossesloss was partly offset by:

 

Lower commodity prices.
The absence of a $555 million net deferred tax benefit resulting from a change in the U.K. tax rate in 2015.
Lower crude oil, natural gas liquids, and gas sales volumes.
Lower equity earnings, primarily driven by increased depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A)DD&A expense, as well as a 2016 deferred tax charge of $174 million resulting from the change of the tax functional currency for APLNG to U.S. dollar.
Higher interest and debt expense.
Lower gain on dispositions, mainly due to the absence of a $368 millionafter-tax gain on the disposition of certain properties in our Lower 48 segment.

Income Statement Analysis

20152017 vs. 20142016

Earnings for ConocoPhillips decreased 175Sales and other operating revenues increased 23 percent in 2015. The decrease was2017, mainly due to higher realized prices across all commodities, partly offset by lower commodity prices.

In addition, earnings were negatively impacted by:

Higher proved propertysales volumes, primarily in our Lower 48, Asia Pacific and equity investment impairments, including a $1.5 billion before-Middle East, and after-tax impairment of our equity investment in APLNG.
Higher exploration expenses. Exploration expenses increased mainlyCanada segments as a result of dispositions.

Equity in earnings of affiliates increased $720 million in 2017. The increase in equity earnings was primarily due to higher unproved property impairments,realized commodity prices at QG3, APLNG and FCCL; the absence of a 2016 deferred tax charge of $174 million resulting from a tax functional currency change; and reduced costs mainly from the disposition of our interest in the FCCL Partnership. The increase in earnings was partly offset by lower volumes as a result of our FCCL disposition.

Gain on dispositions increased 505 percent in 2017. The increase was primarily due to abefore-tax gain of $2.1 billion on the sale of our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the FCCL Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets. For additional information on gains on dispositions, see Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other income increased 107 percent in 2017, mainly due to a $337 million before- andafter-tax International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) arbitration award from The Republic of Ecuador. The increase was partly offset by the absence of a gain of $88 million from our receipt of mineral properties and active leases from the Greater Northern Iron Ore Properties Trust and a $76 millionbefore-tax damage claim settlement, both in our Lower 48 segment in 2016.

Purchased commodities increased 25 percent in 2017, mainly due to higher commodity prices and increased activity.

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased 22 percent in 2017, primarily due to reduced restructuring expenses, lower headcount and reduced activity.

Exploration expenses decreased 51 percent in 2017, primarily as a result of lower leasehold impairment expense, dry hole costs and other exploration expenses. The increase included after-tax unproved property impairments

Leasehold impairment expense was reduced mainly due to the absence of $3682016before-tax charges of $203 million for our Alaska Chukchi Sea leaseholdGibson and capitalized interest, $310Tiber leaseholds. The expense was further reduced by the absence ofbefore-tax charges of $95 million for our Angola Block 36Melmar leasehold and 37 PSCs, $154$79 million for multiplevarious Gulf of Mexico leases and $100after completion of marketing efforts. The reduction was partly offset by abefore-tax charge of $51 million for various Gila Prospect blocks. Additional after-tax dry hole costs and other expenses resulted from a $185 million charge for several properties in Canada, $140 million for two dry holes in Angola, $111 million for a dry hole in the Gila ProspectShenandoah in deepwater Gulf of Mexico and $246abefore-tax charge of $38 million relatedfor certain mineral assets in our Lower 48 segment, both in 2017.

Dry hole costs were reduced primarily due to the terminationabsence of 2016before-tax charges in deepwater Gulf of Mexico of $249 million for our drilling contract with Ensco.

Higher DD&A, mainly from increased productionGibson and commodity price-driven reserve revisions.
Higher restructuring chargesTiber wells, and pension settlement expense.

These reductions to earnings were$128 million for our Melmar well. The absence of a $256 millionbefore-tax charge in 2016 for two dry holes in Nova Scotia further reduced costs. The reduction in dry hole costs was partly offset by higher sales volumes, lower production taxes2017before-tax charges of $288 million for multiple wells in Shenandoah, including wells previously suspended, and $63 million for several wells in the Powder River Basin.

Other exploration expenses were reduced mainly due to reduced commodity prices, lower operating expenses, a $555 million net deferred tax benefit resulting from a change in the U.K. tax rate in the first quarter of 2015, the absence of a $540$146 million after-tax loss resultingbefore-tax expense in 2016 related to the cancellation of our final Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract, as well as lower rig stacking costs in Angola. The decrease in expense was partly offset by a $43 million netbefore-tax charge in 2017 for the settlement of our drilling rig contract in Angola.

For additional information on leasehold impairments and other exploration expenses, see Note 7—Suspended Wells and Other Exploration Expenses, and Note 8—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

DD&A decreased 24 percent in 2017, mainly due to lowerunit-of-production rates from reserve revisions and disposition impacts in our Canada and Lower 48 segments.

Impairments increased $6,462 million in 2017. For additional information, see Note 8—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest and debt expense decreased 12 percent in 2017, primarily due to impacts from the Freeport LNG termination agreement, gainfair market value method of apportioning interest expense in the United States and lower interest on saledebt.

Other expense includedbefore-tax charges of assets,$302 million in 2017 for premiums on early debt retirements.

See Note 18—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for information regarding ourincome tax benefit and higher licensing revenue.

Income Statement Analysiseffective tax rate.

2016 vs. 2015

Sales and other operating revenues decreased 20 percent in 2016, mainly as a result of lower prices across all commodities. Additionally, sales and other operating revenues decreased due to lower natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids sales volumes, mainly from dispositions and field decline, partly offset by increased bitumen sales volumes.

Equity in earnings of affiliates decreased 92 percent in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower commodity prices, increased DD&A mainly from Trains 1 and 2 being placed in service at APLNG, and a 2016 deferred tax charge of $174 million resulting from a tax functional currency change. The decrease in earnings was partly offset by higher sales volumes at APLNG and FCCL Partnership, as well as lower production taxes at Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited (3) (QG3).QG3.

Gain on dispositions decreased 39 percent in 2016. The decrease resulted from the absence of a $583 millionbefore-tax gain in 2015 from the sales of producing properties in East Texas and North Louisiana, South Texas, and a certain pipeline and gathering assets in South Texas, as well as a $26 millionbefore-tax loss on the sale of our interest in the Block B PSC in Indonesia in 2016. The decrease was partly offset by the absence of a $149 millionbefore-tax loss on the disposition of non-corenoncore assets in western Canada in the fourth quarter of 2015; and gains on the 2016 dispositions of ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V., the entity that held our interests in three exploration blocks offshore Senegal, the Alaska Beluga River Unit natural gas field, and non-corenoncore assets in the Lower 48. For additional information on gains on dispositions, see Note 6—4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Sold,Acquired, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other income increased 104 percent in 2016, mainly due to a gain of $88 million from our receipt of mineral properties and active leases from the Greater Northern Iron Ore Properties Trust in the fourth quarter of 2016. Other income was further increased $76 millionbefore-tax for a damage claim settlement in our Lower 48 segment.

Purchased commodities decreased 20 percent in 2016, mainly due to lower natural gas prices.

Production and operating expenses decreased 19 percent in 2016, mainly due to lower operating expense activity, reduced headcount and dispositions of non-corenoncore assets, as well as favorable foreign currency impacts.

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)SG&A expenses decreased 24 percent in 2016, primarily due to reduced restructuring expenses, lower headcount and reduced activity. The decrease was partly offset by increases from market impacts on certain compensation programs.

Exploration expenses decreased 54 percent in 2016, primarily as a result of lower leasehold impairment expense, dry hole costs, and other exploration expenses.

Leasehold impairment expense was reduced, mainly due to the absence of 2015before-tax charges of $575 million for our Chukchi Sea leasehold and capitalized interest; $493 million for Angola Blocks 36 and 37; and $447 million for certain Gulf of Mexico leases, partly offset by 2016 impairments of our Melmar, Gibson, Tiber and other Gulf of Mexico leaseholds.

Dry hole costs were reduced due to the absence ofbefore-tax charges of $1,141 million in 2015, mainly from wells in deepwater Gulf of Mexico, Horn River and Northwest Territories in Canada, Angola Blocks 36 and 37, and Malaysia. The reduction in costs was partly offset bybefore-tax charges in 2016, including $434 million from several wells in deepwater Gulf of Mexico and $256 million for two wells in Nova Scotia.

Other exploration expenses were reduced mainly due to the absence of a $335 millionbefore-tax charge in 2015 related to the termination of our Ensco Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract, partly offset bybefore-tax rig cancellation charges and third-party costs of $146 million for our final Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract in 2016.

For additional information on leasehold impairments and other exploration expenses, see Note 8—7—Suspended Wells and Other Exploration Expenses, and Note 9—8—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impairments decreased 94 percent in 2016. For additional information, see Note 9—8—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Taxes other than income taxes decreased 18 percent in 2016, primarily as a result of lower production taxes, mainly in our Alaska and Lower 48 segments, given reduced commodity prices and the absence of the impact of a transportation cost ruling by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the fourth quarter of 2015 in Alaska. Taxes other than income taxes were additionally decreased due to lower property taxes in 2016 in our Alaska and Lower 48 segments.

Interest and debt expense increased 35 percent in 2016, primarily due to lower capitalized interest on projects and increased debt.

See Note 19—18—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for information regarding ourincome tax provision (benefit)benefit and effective tax rate.

2015 vs. 2014

Sales and other operating revenues decreased 44 percent in 2015, mainly as a result of lower prices across all commodities. Lower prices were partly offset by higher crude oil and LNG sales volumes.

Equity in earnings of affiliates decreased 74 percent in 2015. The decrease was primarily due to lower earnings from FCCL and QG3, given lower commodity prices, partly offset by higher volumes and lower operational costs.

Gain on dispositions increased by $493 million in 2015. The increase resulted from a $583 million gain from the sales of producing properties in East Texas and North Louisiana, South Texas, and a certain pipeline and gathering assets in South Texas. Gains realized were partly offset by a net loss from the disposition of non-core assets in western Canada. For additional information on gains on dispositions, see Note 6—Assets Held for Sale or Sold, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other income decreased 66 percent in 2015, mainly due to the absence of 2014 income related to the resolution of a contingent liability in the Other International segment and a legal arbitration settlement in Asia Pacific and Middle East.

Purchased commodities decreased 44 percent in 2015, largely as a result of lower natural gas prices and the absence of a $130 million loss in the Lower 48 related to transportation and storage capacity agreements recognized in 2014.

Production and operating expenses decreased 21 percent in 2015, largely due to lower operating expense activity, including reduced turnarounds at our Bayu-Undan Field and Darwin LNG facility, favorable foreign exchange-related impacts, and the absence of an $849 million charge resulting from the Freeport LNG termination agreement in 2014. The decrease in expense was partially offset by restructuring expenses of $206 million in 2015.

SG&A expenses increased 30 percent in 2015, primarily due to $407 million in restructuring and pension settlement expenses, partially offset by lower staff and compensation plan costs.

Exploration expenses increased 105 percent in 2015, mainly as a result of higher unproved property impairments, primarily in Alaska, Angola and the Lower 48. Higher dry hole and other exploration costs, including a $253 million before-tax expense for wells charged to dry hole in Canada, a $383 million expense related to the termination of our Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract, and a $176 million charge for two wells charged to dry hole in the Gila prospect in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, also contributed to the increase in exploration expenses. For additional information on leasehold impairments and other exploration expenses, see Note 8—Suspended Wells and Other Exploration Expenses and Note 9—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

DD&A increased 9 percent in 2015. The increase was mainly associated with higher production volumes in the Lower 48 and Asia Pacific and Middle East and commodity price-related reserve revisions, partly offset by reserve additions in the Lower 48.

Impairments increased 162 percent in 2015. For additional information, see Note 9—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Taxes other than income taxes decreased 57 percent in 2015, mainly due to lower production taxes from reduced commodity prices in the Lower 48, Alaska and Asia Pacific and Middle East.

Interest and debt expense increased 42 percent in 2015, primarily due to lower capitalized interest on projects and increased average debt levels in 2015.

See Note 19—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for information regarding ourincome tax provision (benefit) and effective tax rate.

Summary Operating Statistics

   2016   2015   2014 
  

 

 

 

Average Net Production

      

Crude oil (MBD)*

   598     605     595   

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

   145     156     159   

Bitumen (MBD)

   183     151     129   

Natural gas (MMCFD)**

   3,857     4,060     3,943   

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)***

   1,569     1,589     1,540   

 

 
   Dollars Per Unit  
  

 

 

 

Average Sales Prices

      

Crude oil (per barrel)

  $          40.86     48.26     92.80   

Natural gas liquids (per barrel)

   16.68     17.79     38.99   

Bitumen (per barrel)

   15.27     18.72     55.13   

Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet)

   3.00     3.96     6.57   

 

 
   Millions of Dollars  
  

 

 

 

Worldwide Exploration Expenses

      

General and administrative; geological and geophysical, lease rental, and other

  $731     1,127     879   

Leasehold impairment

   466     1,924     562   

Dry holes

   718     1,141     604   

 

 
  $1,915     4,192     2,045   

 

 

   2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

 

Average Net Production

      

Crude oil (MBD)*

   599    598    605 

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

   111    145    156 

Bitumen (MBD)

   122    183    151 

Natural gas (MMCFD)**

   3,270    3,857    4,060 

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)***

   1,377    1,569    1,589 

 

 
   Dollars Per Unit 
  

 

 

 

Average Sales Prices

      

Crude oil (per barrel)

  $          51.96    40.86    48.26 

Natural gas liquids (per barrel)

   25.22    16.68    17.79 

Bitumen (per barrel)

   22.66    15.27    18.72 

Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet)

   4.07    3.00    3.96 

 

 
   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 

Worldwide Exploration Expenses

      

General and administrative; geological and geophysical, lease rental, and other

  $372    731    1,127 

Leasehold impairment

   136    466    1,924 

Dry holes

   430    718    1,141 

 

 
  $938    1,915    4,192 

 

 

Excludes discontinued operations.      *Thousands of barrels per day.

*Thousands of barrels per day.
**Millions of cubic feet per day. Represents quantities available for sale and excludes gas equivalent of natural gas liquids included above.
  ***Thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day.

    **Millions of cubic feet per day. Represents quantities available for sale and excludes gas equivalent of natural gas liquids included above.

  ***Thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day.

We explore for, produce, transport and market crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids on a worldwide basis. At December 31, 2016,2017, our operations were producing in the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, China, Malaysia, Qatar and Libya.

Total production, including Libya, of 1,377 MBOED decreased 12 percent in 2017 compared with 2016. The decrease in total average production primarily resulted from noncore asset dispositions, including our Canada and San Juan transactions in 2017 and the sale of our interest in the Block B production sharing contract (PSC) in Indonesia in 2016, and normal field decline. The decrease in production was partly offset by production from major developments, including tight oil plays in the Lower 48; Malikai and the Kebabangan gas field in Malaysia; Surmont in Canada; and APLNG in Australia. Improved drilling and well performance in Alaska, Norway and China also partly offset the decrease in production. Excluding Libya, our 2017 production was 1,356 MBOED. Adjusted for the impact of closed and planned dispositions of 191 MBOED in 2017 and 434 MBOED in 2016 and Libya, our underlying production increased 32 MBOED, or 3 percent, compared with 2016.

In 2016, total production, including Libya, of 1,569 MBOED decreased 1 percent in 2016 compared with 2015. The decrease in total average production primarily resulted from normal field decline and the loss of 72 MBOED

mainly attributable to the 2015 dispositions of several non-corenoncore assets in the Lower 48, western Canada and the sale of our interest in the Polar Lights Company in Russia. The decrease in production was partly offset by additional production from major developments, including tight oil plays in the Lower 48; APLNG in Australia; the Western North Slope in Alaska; the Kebabangan gas field in Malaysia; and the Greater Ekofisk Area in Norway. Improved drilling and well performance in Canada, Norway, the Lower 48, and China, as well as lower unplanned downtime in the Lower 48 also partly offset the decrease in production. Adjusted for downtime and dispositions of 66 MBOED, our production, excluding Libya, increased by 44 MBOED, or 3 percent, compared with 2015. Assets sold in 2016 produced 27 MBOED and 36 MBOED in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

In 2015, average production from continuing operations, including Libya, increased 3 percent compared with 2014, while average liquids production increased 4 percent. The increase in total average production in 2015 primarily resulted from additional production from major developments, including tight oil plays in the Lower 48; Gumusut in Malaysia; APLNG in Australia; Greater Britannia projects and the J-Area in the U.K.; and the ramp-up of Foster Creek Phase F in Canada. Improved well performance, mostly in the Lower 48, western Canada and Norway, and lower turnaround activity also contributed to higher production in 2015. These increases were largely offset by normal field decline. Adjusted for downtime and dispositions of 13 MBOED,

our production from continuing operations, excluding Libya, increased by 70 MBOED, or 5 percent, compared with 2014. Full-year 2015 production from assets sold or under agreement was 64 MBOED.

Alaska

 

  2016   2015   2014   2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations(millions of dollars)

  $319     4     2,041   

Net Income Attributable to ConocoPhillips(millions of dollars)

  $1,466    319    4 

 

 

Average Net Production

            

Crude oil (MBD)

   163     158     162      167    163    158 

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

   12     13     13      14    12    13 

Natural gas (MMCFD)

   25     42     49      7    25    42 

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

   179     178     183      182    179    178 

 

 

Average Sales Prices

            

Crude oil (per barrel)

  $          41.93     51.61     97.68     $          53.33    41.93    51.61 

Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet)

   5.22     4.33     5.42      2.72    5.22    4.33 

 

 

The Alaska segment primarily explores for, produces, transports and markets crude oil, natural gas liquids, natural gas and LNG. In 2016,2017, Alaska contributed 1922 percent of our worldwide liquids production and less than 1 percent of our natural gas production.

2017 vs. 2016

Alaska reported earnings of $1,466 million in 2017, compared with earnings of $319 million in 2016. The increase in earnings was mainly due to an $892 million tax benefit from the revaluation of allocated U.S. deferred taxes at a lower federal statutory rate, in accordance with the newly enacted Tax Legislation. Earnings were additionally improved due to higher crude oil prices in 2017. The earnings increase was partly offset by a $110 millionafter-tax impairment charge for the associated properties, plants and equipment of our small interest in the Point Thomson unit.

Average production increased 2 percent in 2017 compared with 2016, as the impact of normal field decline was more than offset by well performance in the Western North Slope, Greater Prudhoe and Greater Kuparuk areas and lower unplanned downtime.

2016 vs. 2015

Alaska reported earnings of $319 million in 2016, compared with earnings of $4 million in 2015. The increase in earnings was mainly due to:

 

Lower exploration expenses, primarily due to the absence of the 2015 impairment charge for our Chukchi Sea leasehold and capitalized interest. For additional information on our impairments, see Note 9—8—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reduced production and operating expense, mainly from lower maintenance costs and general and administrative expenses.
Enhanced oil recovery tax credits.

Higher crude oil sales volumes, partly offset by the absence of LNG sales volumes.
A $57 millionafter-tax impact for the recognition of state deferred tax assets.
A $36 millionafter-tax gain on the sale of our interest in the Alaska Beluga River Unit natural gas field.

The increase in earnings was partly offset by lower crude oil prices and higher DD&A expense, mainly due to capital additions.

Average production increased 1 percent in 2016 compared with 2015, primarily due to new production from the Alpine CD5 drill site and strong well performance in the Greater Prudhoe Area. The production increase was partly offset by normal field decline.

2015 vs. 2014Acquisition

In January 2018, we entered into an agreement to acquire certain oil and gas assets in Alaska reported earningsfor $400 million, subject to customary adjustments. The acquisition is subject to regulatory approval. We will have a 100 percent interest in approximately 1.2 million acres of $4 million in 2015, compared with earnings of $2,041 million in 2014, mainly due to lower commodity pricesexploration and a $368 million after-tax charge indevelopment lands, including the fourth quarter of 2015 for the impairment of our Chukchi Sea leasehold and capitalized interest. The earnings decrease was partly offset by reduced production taxes resulting from lower commodity prices.

Average production decreased 3 percent in 2015 compared with 2014, primarily due to normal field decline, partly offset by lower planned downtime activity and new production from the Western North Slope, Greater Prudhoe and Greater Kuparuk areas.Willow Discovery.

Lower 48

 

  2016   2015   2014   2017 2016 2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from Continuing Operations(millions of dollars)

  $(2,257)     (1,932)     (22)   

Net Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips(millions of dollars)

  $(2,371 (2,257 (1,932

 

 

Average Net Production

          

Crude oil (MBD)

   195     206     188      180  195  206 

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

   88     94     97      69  88  94 

Natural gas (MMCFD)

   1,219     1,472     1,491      898  1,219  1,472 

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

   486     545     533      399  486  545 

 

 

Average Sales Prices

          

Crude oil (per barrel)

  $          37.49     42.62     84.18     $          47.36  37.49  42.62 

Natural gas liquids (per barrel)

   14.34     14.01     30.74      22.20  14.34  14.01 

Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet)

   2.20     2.43     4.29      2.73  2.20  2.43 

 

 

The Lower 48 segment consists of operations located in the U.S. Lower 48 states and exploration activities in the Gulf of Mexico. During 2016,2017, the Lower 48 contributed 30 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 3227 percent of our natural gas production.

2017 vs. 2016

Lower 48 reported a loss of $2,371 millionafter-tax in 2017, compared with a loss of $2,257 millionafter-tax in 2016. The increase in loss was primarily due to proved property impairments in 2017, totaling $2.5 billionafter-tax, for our interests in the San Juan Basin and the Barnett which were written down to fair value less costs to sell. Lower natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids sales volumes from asset dispositions and normal field decline further increased losses during the year.

The increase in losses was partly offset by:

Lower DD&A expense, mainly resulting from a lowerunit-of-production rate from reserve revisions, disposition impacts and lower volumes.
A $689 million tax benefit, primarily related to the revaluation of allocated U.S. deferred taxes at a lower federal statutory rate, in accordance with the newly enacted Tax Legislation.
Higher realized crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas prices.
Lower exploration expenses mainly due to:

¡Lower leasehold impairment expense, primarily the absence of 2016after-tax charges of $132 million for our Gibson and Tiber leaseholds; $62 million for our Melmar leasehold and $52 million for various Gulf of Mexico leases after completion of marketing efforts. The reduction was partly offset by anafter-tax charge of $33 million for Shenandoah in deepwater Gulf of Mexico and anafter-tax charge of $24 million for certain mineral assets, both in 2017.
¡Lower other exploration expenses, mainly due to the absence of a $95 millionafter-tax expense in 2016 related to the cancellation of our final Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract.
¡Lower dry hole costs primarily due to the absence of 2016after-tax charges in deepwater Gulf of Mexico of $162 million for our Gibson and Tiber wells, and $83 million for our Melmar well, partly offset by 2017after-tax charges of $187 million for multiple wells in Shenandoah and $41 million for several wells in the Powder River Basin.

In 2017, our average realized crude oil price of $47.36 per barrel was 7 percent less than WTI of $50.90 per barrel. The differential is driven primarily by local market dynamics in the Gulf Coast and Bakken.

Total average production decreased 18 percent in 2017 compared with 2016. The decrease was mainly attributable to normal field decline and the disposition of our interests in the San Juan Basin, partly offset by new production, primarily from Eagle Ford and Bakken.

Asset Disposition

On July 31, 2017, we completed the sale of our interests in the San Juan Basin for total proceeds comprised of $2.5 billion in cash after customary adjustments and a contingent payment of up to $300 million. Thesix-year contingent payment, effective beginning January 1, 2018, is due annually for the periods in which the monthly U.S. Henry Hub price is at or above $3.20 per million British thermal units.

On September 29, 2017, we completed the sale of our interest in the Panhandle assets for $178 million in cash after customary adjustments.

For additional information on our asset sales in the Lower 48, see Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2016 vs. 2015

Lower 48 reported a loss of $2,257 millionafter-tax in 2016, compared with a loss of $1,932 millionafter-tax in 2015. The increase in losses was primarily due to:

 

The absence of a $368 millionafter-tax gain on the disposition of certain properties in South Texas, East Texas and North Louisiana.
Lower crude oil and natural gas prices.
Lower sales volumes across all commodities due to dispositions and field decline.
Higher proved property impairments, including a $49 millionafter-tax impairment associated with changes to development plans for Eagle Ford infrastructure.

The increase in losses was partly offset by:

 

Lower production and operating expenses, mainly due to reduced activity and cost efficiencies.
Lower exploration expenses, mainly due to:

 

 ¡  Reduced other exploration costs, mainly due to the absence of a $216 millionafter-tax charge related to the termination of our Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract with Ensco in 2015, partly offset by 2016 rig cancellation and related third party costs of $95 millionafter-tax for our final Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract.
 ¡  Lower general and administrative, and geological and geophysical expenses.
 ¡  Lower leasehold impairment expense, including the absence of 2015after-tax charges of $154 million for certain leases in the Gulf of Mexico and $100 million for various blocks in the Gila Prospect. The decrease in leasehold impairment was partly offset by 2016after-tax charges of $132 million for our Gibson and Tiber leaseholds and $62 million for the Melmar Prospect, all in the Gulf of Mexico.

 ¡  Lower exploration expenses were partly offset by slightly increased dry hole costs in 2016, includingafter-tax charges in deepwater Gulf of Mexico of $162 million for our Gibson and Tiber wells and $83 million associated with our Melmar well. Dry hole costs in 2016 were partly offset by the absence of a $111 millionafter-tax charge in 2015 associated with two wells in the Gila Prospect in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.

 

An $88 million gain associated with our receipt of Greater Northern Iron Ore Properties Trust assets in the fourth quarter of 2016.
A $48 millionafter-tax benefit from a damage claim settlement.
A $38 millionafter-tax gain from the disposition of non-corenoncore assets and lease exchanges.
Lower DD&A, mainly due to 2016 reserve additions and reduced volumes, partly offset byprice-related reserve revisions.

Our average realized prices in the Lower 48 have historically correlated with WTI prices; however, beginning in the second half of 2013, our Lower 48 crude differential versus WTI began to widen. Our 2016 average realized crude oil price of $37.49 per barrel was 13 percent less than WTI of $43.20 per barrel. The differential is driven primarily by local market dynamics in the Gulf Coast, Bakken and the Permian Basin, and may remain relatively wide in the near term.

Total average production decreased 11 percent in 2016 compared with 2015. The decrease was mainly attributable to normal field decline and the 2015 disposition of non-corenoncore properties in East Texas and North Louisiana, as well as South Texas. The reduction was partly offset by new production and well performance, primarily from Eagle Ford, Bakken and the Permian Basin, as well as lower unplanned downtime.

2015 vs. 2014

Lower 48 reported a loss of $1,932 million after-tax in 2015, compared with a loss of $22 million after-tax in 2014. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to:

Lower crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices.
Higher DD&A, mostly due to increased crude oil production.
Higher exploration expenses, mainly due to:

¡Increased impairment expense in 2015, including after-tax charges of $154 million for certain leases in the Gulf of Mexico and $100 million for various blocks in the Gila Prospect, where we ceased further activity.
¡A $246 million after-tax charge to exploration expense related to the termination of our Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract with Ensco.
¡Higher dry hole costs, including $111 million after-tax, associated with two wells in the Gila Prospect in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.

These decreases were partly offset by the absence of a $545 million after-tax charge resulting from the Freeport LNG termination agreement in 2014; a $368 million after-tax gain on the disposition of certain properties in South Texas, East Texas and North Louisiana; higher volumes; lower production taxes; and the absence of a $151 million after-tax impairment charge resulting from reduced volume forecasts on proved properties and the associated undeveloped leasehold costs.

Total average production increased 2 percent in 2015 compared with 2014, while average crude oil production increased 10 percent across the same period. The increase was mainly attributable to new production, primarily from Eagle Ford, Bakken and the Permian Basin, partially offset by normal field decline.

Canada

 

  2016   2015   2014   2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations (millions of dollars)

  $(935)     (1,044)     940   

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips (millions of dollars)

  $2,564    (935)    (1,044) 

 

 

Average Net Production

            

Crude oil (MBD)

   7     12     13      3    7    12 

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

   23     26     23      9    23    26 

Bitumen (MBD)

            

Consolidated operations

   35     13     12      59    35    13 

Equity affiliates

   148     138     117      63    148    138 

 

 

Total bitumen

   183     151     129      122    183    151 

 

 

Natural gas (MMCFD)

   524     715     711      187    524    715 

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

   300     308     284      165    300    308 

 

 

Average Sales Prices

            

Crude oil (per barrel)

  $        35.25               39.52               77.87     $        43.69              35.25              39.52 

Natural gas liquids (per barrel)

   14.82     17.02     46.23      21.51    14.82    17.02 

Bitumen (dollars per barrel)

            

Consolidated operations

   12.91     20.13     60.03      21.43    12.91    20.13 

Equity affiliates

   15.80     18.58     54.62      23.83    15.80    18.58 

Total bitumen

   15.27     18.72     55.13      22.66    15.27    18.72 

Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet)

   1.49     1.91     4.13      1.93    1.49    1.91 

 

 

Our Canadian operations mainly consist of natural gas fields in western Canada andan oil sands developmentsdevelopment in the Athabasca Regionregion of northeastern Alberta.Alberta and a liquids-rich unconventional play in western Canada. In 2016,2017, Canada contributed 2316 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 146 percent of our worldwide natural gas production.

2017 vs. 2016

Canada operations reported earnings of $2,564 million in 2017, an increase of $3,499 million compared with 2016. The earnings increase was mainly due to anafter-tax gain of $1.6 billion on the sale of certain Canadian assets, further discussed below, as well as the recognition of $996 million in deferred tax benefits related to the capital gains component of our disposition and the recognition of previously unrealizable Canadian tax basis.

In addition to the items discussed above, earnings were further increased due to:

Lower DD&A, mainly from disposition impacts.
Lower dry hole costs, mainly due to the absence of 2016 combinedafter-tax charges in offshore Nova Scotia of $187 million for our Cheshire and Monterey Jack wells.
Higher realized prices across all commodities.
A $114 million tax benefit related to our prior decision to exit Nova Scotia deepwater exploration.
Lower production and operating expenses.
Improved equity earnings, as improved prices and reduced DD&A more than offset the volume loss from our Canada disposition.

The earnings increase was partly offset by additional volume reductions from the disposition of our western Canada gas assets.

Total average production decreased 45 percent in 2017 compared with 2016. The production decrease was primarily due to the Canada disposition, partly offset by productionramp-up at Surmont.

Asset Disposition

On May 17, 2017, we completed the sale of our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the FCCL Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets to Cenovus Energy. Consideration for the transaction was $11.0 billion in cash after customary adjustments, 208 million Cenovus Energy common shares and afive-year uncapped contingent payment. The contingent payment, calculated and paid on a quarterly basis, is $6 million Canadian dollars (CAD) for every $1 CAD by which the Western Canada Select (WCS) quarterly average crude price exceeds $52 CAD per barrel. See Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired and Note 6—Investment in Cenovus Energy, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information regarding our Canada disposition.

2016 vs. 2015

Canada operations reported a loss of $935 million in 2016, a decrease in loss of $109 million compared with 2015. The decrease in loss was primarily due to:

 

The absence of a $136 million impact of a 2 percent increase in Alberta corporate tax rates on deferred taxes in 2015.
Lower production and operating expenses, mainly due to reduced headcount and the disposition of non-corenoncore assets in western Canada.
Lower exploration expenses, mainly due to:

 

 ¡  Reduced leasehold impairment expense, including the absence of an impairment charge for undeveloped leasehold in the Duvernay, Thornbury, Saleski and Crow Lake areas. The reduction in leasehold impairment expense was partly offset by a $23 millionafter-tax charge in the fourth quarter of 2016 primarily due to decisions to discontinue further testing on undeveloped leaseholds.
 ¡  Lower general and administrative, and geological and geophysical expenses.
 ¡  Lower dry hole costs, mainly due to the absence of 2015 charges associated with our Horn River, Northwest Territories, Thornbury and Saleski properties, partly offset by dry hole costs in 2016, including totalafter-tax charges in offshore Nova Scotia of $187 million for our Cheshire and Monterey Jack wells.

Higher gains on dispositions, including the absence of a $103 million netafter-tax loss on the disposition of non-corenoncore assets in western Canada in 2015.

The decrease in loss was partly offset by lower commodity prices; higher DD&A expense, mainly from price-related reserve revisions; and a $42 millionafter-tax impairment charge related to certain developed properties in central Alberta, which were classified as held for sale, being written down to fair value less costs to sell.

Total average production decreased 3 percent in 2016 compared with 2015, while bitumen production increased 21 percent over the same periods. The decrease in total production was mainly attributable to the disposition of non-corenoncore assets in western Canada and normal field decline. The production decrease was partly offset by strong well performance in western Canada, Surmont and FCCL. Surmont has fully recovered from the forest fire impacts.

2015 vs. 2014

Canada operations reported a loss of $1,044 million in 2015, a reduction in earnings of $1,984 million compared with 2014. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to:

Lower bitumen and natural gas prices.
Higher exploration expenses, mainly due to:

¡Higher dry hole costs, including an after-tax charge of $185 million associated with our Horn River, Northwest Territories, Thornbury and Saleski properties.
¡An after-tax impairment charge of $75 million for undeveloped leaseholds in the Duvernay, Thornbury, Saleski and Crow Lake areas.

A 2 percent increase in Alberta corporate tax rates on deferred taxes.
A $103 million net after-tax loss realized on the disposition of non-core assets in western Canada.

The earnings decrease was partly offset by higher bitumen production volumes; lower operating expenses and DD&A, both primarily from favorable foreign currency impacts; and the absence of the $109 million after-tax impairment of undeveloped leasehold costs associated with the offshore Amauligak discovery, Arctic Islands and other Beaufort properties in 2014.

Total average production increased 8 percent in 2015 compared with 2014, while bitumen production increased 17 percent over the same periods. The increases in total production were mainly attributable to strong well performance in western Canada, lower royalty impacts, strong plant performance at Foster Creek and Christina Lake and the continued ramp-up of production from Foster Creek Phase F. These increases were partly offset by normal field decline and increased unplanned downtime, including the precautionary shut down of Foster Creek for nearby forest fires in the second quarter of 2015.

Europe and North Africa

 

   2016     2015     2014    2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations(millions of dollars)

  $394      409      814  

 

Net Income Attributable to ConocoPhillips(millions of dollars)

  $553     394     409 

Average Net Production

            

Crude oil (MBD)

   122      120      134     142     122     120 

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

             8             7 

Natural gas (MMCFD)

   460      476      464     484     460     476 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

   205      207      219     230     205     207 

 

Average Sales Prices

            

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

  $        43.66      52.75              98.98    $        54.21             43.66             52.75 

Natural gas liquids (per barrel)

   22.62              27.56      52.65     34.07     22.62     27.56 

Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet)

   4.71      7.14      9.28     5.70     4.71     7.14 

 

The Europe and North Africa segment consists of operations principally located in the Norwegian and U.K. sectors of the North Sea, the Norwegian Sea and Libya. In 2016,2017, our Europe and North Africa operations contributed 1418 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 1215 percent of our natural gas production.

2017 vs. 2016

Earnings for Europe and North Africa operations of $553 million increased 40 percent in 2017. The increase in earnings was primarily due to higher realized crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices. Earnings were additionally improved by lower DD&A, mainly due to reserve revisions; a $60 million tax benefit from the revaluation of allocated U.S. deferred taxes at a lower U.S. federal statutory rate, in accordance with the newly enacted Tax Legislation; and a $41 million tax benefit in Norway.

The increase in earnings was partly offset by the absence of a 2016 net deferred tax benefit of $161 million resulting from a change in the U.K. tax rate and a lower credit to impairment in 2017, compared to 2016, reflecting the annual updates to asset retirement obligations (ARO) on fields at or nearing the end of life which were impaired in prior years. The earnings improvement was further reduced by a net deferred tax charge of $65 million in the U.K. resulting from updated assumptions regarding applicable tax rates.

Average production increased 12 percent in 2017, compared with 2016. The increase was mainly due to the resumption andramp-up of production in Libya; improved drilling and well performance in Norway; new production from the Greater Britannia Area and Norway; and higher Norway gas offtake, partly offset by normal field decline.

2016 vs. 2015

Earnings for Europe and North Africa operations of $394 million decreased 4 percent in 2016. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to the absence of a $555 million net deferred tax benefit as a result of a change in the U.K. tax rate, effective at the beginning of 2015; lower crude oil and natural gas prices; lower sales volumes; and the absence of a 2015after-tax gain of $49 million on the sale of our 1.9 percent interest in Norwegian Continental Shelf Gas Transportation (Gassled).

The decrease in earnings was partly offset by:

 

Lower property impairments, including the absence of 2015after-tax charges of $317 million in the U.K. due to lower crude oil and natural gas prices, and a $180 million credit to impairment in 2016 due to decreased asset retirement obligationARO estimates on fields that areat or nearing the end of life andwhich were impaired in prior years. The reduction in property impairments was partly offset by a $59 millionafter-tax charge associated with our Calder Field and Rivers terminal in the U.K. For additional information on our impairments, see Note 9—8—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Lower DD&A expense in the U.K. driven by reduced rate, as a result of completed depreciation on the Brodgar H3tie-back well in 2015, and lower volumes.
A $161 million net deferred tax benefit resulting from a reduction in the U.K. tax rate, which was enacted in September 2016 and effective January 1, 2016.
Reduced operating expenses across the segment.

Average production decreased 1 percent in 2016, compared with 2015. The decrease in production was mainly due to normal field decline, partly offset by improved drilling and well performance in Norway and new production from the Greater Ekofisk and Greater Britannia areas. Libya production remained largely shut in, as the Es Sider crude oil export terminal closure continued throughout the third quarter of 2016. Production resumed in Libya in October 2016, with three crude liftings from Es Sider in January 2017. We expect a gradual ramp-up in activity.2016.

2015 vs. 2014

Earnings for Europe and North Africa operations decreased 50 percent in 2015. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to lower crude oil and natural gas prices. Earnings further decreased due to higher property impairments in the U.K., given lower natural gas prices and increases to asset retirement obligations. The earnings decrease was partly offset by a $555 million net deferred tax benefit as a result of a change in the U.K. tax rate, effective at the beginning of 2015, and an after-tax gain of $49 million on the sale of our 1.9 percent interest in Norwegian Continental Shelf Gas Transportation (Gassled).

For additional information on the impairments, see Note 9—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Average production decreased 5 percent in 2015, compared with 2014. The decrease in production was mostly due to normal field decline and lower volumes from Libya, partly offset by the new production from the Greater Britannia Area, the J-Area and the Greater Ekofisk Area, as well as improved well performance in Norway.

The Es Sider Terminal in Libya remained shut in throughout 2015 as a result of civil unrest.

Asia Pacific and Middle East

 

   2016     2015     2014    2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations(millions of dollars)

  $265     (406)     3,008  

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips (millions of dollars)

  $(1,098)    209    (463) 

Average Net Production

            

Crude oil (MBD)

            

Consolidated operations

   97     91     79     93    97    91 

Equity affiliates

   14     14     15     14    14    14 

 

 

Total crude oil

   111             105     94     107    111    105 

 

 

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

            

Consolidated operations

   7     9     10     4    7    9 

Equity affiliates

   8     7     8     7    8    7 

 

 

Total natural gas liquids

   15     16     18     11    15    16 

 

 

Natural gas (MMCFD)

            

Consolidated operations

   730     717     723     687    730    717 

Equity affiliates

   899             638     505     1,007            899    638 

 

 

Total natural gas

   1,629     1,355     1,228     1,694    1,629    1,355 

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

   399             347     317     401            399    347 

 

 

Average Sales Prices

            

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

            

Consolidated operations

  $42.23     49.70     95.32    $54.38    42.23    49.70 

Equity affiliates

   44.11     53.12     99.01     54.76    44.11    53.12 

Total crude oil

   42.47     50.16     95.92     54.43    42.47    50.16 

Natural gas liquids (dollars per barrel)

            

Consolidated operations

   29.00     37.78             69.36     41.37    29.00    37.78 

Equity affiliates

           31.13     35.79     67.20     38.74    31.13    35.79 

Total natural gas liquids

   30.11     36.88     68.46             39.75    30.11            36.88 

Natural gas (dollars per thousand cubic feet)

            

Consolidated operations

   4.31     6.23     9.80     4.98    4.31    6.23 

Equity affiliates

   2.97     4.83     9.79     4.27    2.97    4.83 

Total natural gas

   3.57     5.58     9.80     4.55    3.57    5.58 

 

 

The Asia Pacific and Middle East segment has operations in China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, Timor-Leste and Qatar, as well as exploration activities in Brunei. During 2016,2017, Asia Pacific and Middle East contributed 14 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 4252 percent of our natural gas production.

2017 vs. 2016

Asia Pacific and Middle East reported a loss of $1,098 million in 2017, compared with earnings of $209 million in 2016. The increase in loss was mainly due to a $2,384 million before- andafter-tax charge for the impairment of our APLNG investment in 2017. For additional information on our APLNG impairment, see the “APLNG” section of Note 5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Additionally, lower sales volumes in Indonesia, Australia and China further increased losses.

The increase in losses was partly offset by higher equity earnings, mainly as a result of higher commodity prices, increased sales volumes at APLNG and the absence of a 2016 deferred tax charge of $174 million resulting from the change of our APLNG tax functional currency. Higher realized crude oil and natural gas prices onnon-equity volumes further reduced the loss.

Average production was essentially flat in 2017.

2016 vs. 2015

Asia Pacific and Middle East reported earnings of $265$209 million in 2016, compared with a loss of $406$463 million in 2015. The earnings increase was mainly due to:

 

The absence of a $1,502 million before- andafter-tax charge for the impairment of our APLNG investment in 2015. For additional information on our APLNG impairment, see the “APLNG” section of Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Higher LNG sales volumes.

Lower production taxes.
Reduced feedstock costs at Darwin LNG.
Lower operating expenses, mainly due to lower general and administrative spend, maintenance costs and transportation expenses across the segment.
Lower exploration expenses, mainly due to lower dry hole costs, as well as the absence of a $41 millionafter-tax charge in 2015 for the impairment of our relinquished Palangkaraya PSC, and reduced exploration general and administrative expense.

The earnings increase was partly offset by lower prices across all commodities; lower equity earnings from APLNG, mainly as a result of higher DD&A expense from APLNG Trains 1 and 2 coming online; and a third-quarter 2016 deferred tax charge of $174 million resulting from APLNG’s tax functional currency change.

Average production increased 15 percent in 2016, compared with 2015. The production increase in 2016 was mainly attributable to new production from theramp-up of APLNG in Australia and the Kebabangan gas field in Malaysia, improved drilling and well performance in China and Malaysia, and increased recoveries from production sharing contracts in Indonesia. The production increase was partially offset by normal field decline across the segment.

2015 vs. 2014

Asia Pacific and Middle East reported a loss of $406 million in 2015, compared with income of $3,008 million in 2014. The decrease in earnings was mainly due to lower prices across all commodities. Earnings in 2015 were further decreased by a $1,502 million before- and after-tax charge for the impairment of our APLNG investment, higher DD&A expense from increased volumes, primarily in Malaysia, and a $41 million after-tax charge for the impairment of our relinquished Palangkaraya PSC. The earnings decrease was partially offset by lower production taxes, increased volumes, as well as lower feedstock costs and reduced turnarounds at our Bayu-Undan Field and Darwin LNG facility.

Average production increased 9 percent in 2015, compared with 2014. The production increase was mainly attributable to new production from Gumusut, in Malaysia, which came online in the fourth quarter of 2014; the ramp-up of APLNG production due to additional gas processing facilities online; and infill drilling in China. Production increases were partly offset by normal field decline.

Other International

 

   2016       2015       2014     2017      2016      2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from Continuing Operations (millions of dollars)

  $            (16)       (593)       (100)   

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips (millions of dollars)

  $            167      (16)      (593)  

 

 

Average Net Production

                    

Crude oil (MBD)

                    

Equity affiliates

          4                         

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

          4                         

 

 

Average Sales Prices

                    

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

                    

Equity affiliates

          37.21       64.14                  37.21  

 

 

The Other International segment includes exploration activities in Colombia and Chile.

2017 vs. 2016

Other International operations reported earnings of $167 million in 2017, compared with a loss of $16 million in 2016. The increase in earnings was primarily due to a $320 million before- andafter-tax ICSID award from an arbitration with The Republic of Ecuador. Earnings were additionally increased due to lower rig stacking costs in Angola. The increase in earnings was partly offset by the absence of a $138 million gain in 2016 on the disposition of ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V., the entity that held our interest in three exploration blocks offshore Senegal, and a $45 million tax charge from the revaluation of allocated U.S. deferred taxes at a lower U.S. federal statutory rate, in accordance with the newly enacted Tax Legislation.

2016 vs. 2015

Other International operations reported a loss of $16 million in 2016, compared with a loss of $593 million in 2015. The decrease in losses was primarily due to the absence ofafter-tax charges in 2015 of $235 million, $75 million and $32 million net for property impairments on our Angola Block 36, Angola Block 37 and Poland leasehold, respectively. Additionally, losses decreased due to the absence of the 2015after-tax dry hole expenses offshore Angola of $81 million for theOmosi-1 well and $59 million for theVali-1 well, combined with a $138 million gain on the 2016 disposition of ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V., the entity that held our interest in three exploration blocks offshore Senegal.

2015 vs. 2014

Other International operations reported a loss of $593 million in 2015, compared with a loss of $100 million in 2014. The decrease in earnings was primarily due to after-tax charges of $235 million, $75 million and $32 million net for property impairments on our Angola Block 36, Angola Block 37 and Poland leasehold, respectively. Earnings were also reduced due to increased dry hole expenses for the Omosi-1 and Vali-1 wells offshore Angola and the absence of other income of $154 million after-tax associated with the favorable resolution of a contingent liability. The reduction in earnings was partly offset by the absence of the $136 million after-tax charge in 2014 for the Kamoxi-1 exploration well, located offshore Angola; and a $53 million after-tax gain from the disposition of our interest in the Polar Lights Company.

For additional information on the impairments, see Note 9—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Average production was flat in 2015 compared with 2014.

Corporate and Other

 

   Millions of Dollars     Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016                 2015                 2014     2017              2016              2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

      

Net Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips

    

Net interest

  $(980)     (518)     (502)     $(739 (980 (518

Corporate general and administrative expenses

   (289)     (246)     (194)      (284 (289 (246

Technology

   50      122     (93)      20   50  122 

Other

   (110)     (167)     (85)      (1,133 (110 (167

 

 
  $          (1,329)     (809)     (874)     $          (2,136 (1,329 (809

 

 

20162017 vs. 20152016

Net interest consists of interest and financing expense, net of interest income and capitalized interest. Net interest decreased 25 percent in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily due to impacts from the fair market value method of apportioning interest expense in the United States and lower interest as a result of reduced debt. Higher interest income further drove the decrease in net interest, which was partly offset by lower capitalized interest on projects.

Corporate general and administrative expenses which include pension settlement expenses and compensation program costs was essentially flat in 2017.

Technology includes our investment in new technologies or businesses, as well as licensing revenues received. Activities are focused on tight oil reservoirs, LNG, oil sands and other production operations. Earnings from Technology were $20 million in 2017, compared with $50 million in 2016. The decrease in earnings primarily resulted from lower licensing revenues, partly offset by reduced technology program spend.

The category “Other” includes certain foreign currency transaction gains and losses, environmental costs associated with sites no longer in operation, other costs not directly associated with an operating segment and premiums incurred on the early retirement of debt. “Other” expenses increased $1,023 million in 2017, mainly due to an $813 million tax charge from the revaluation of deferred taxes at a lower federal statutory rate, in accordance with the newly enacted Tax Legislation and premiums on our early retirement of debt.

2016 vs. 2015

Net interest increased 89 percent in 2016 compared with 2015, primarily as a result of the absence of the 2015 impacts from the fair market value of apportioning interest expense in the United States, lower capitalized interest on projects, and increased debt.

Corporate general and administrative expenses increased 17 percent in 2016, mainly due to increases from market impacts on certain compensation programs, partly offset by lower staff expenses.

Technology includes our investment in new technologies or businesses, as well as licensing revenues received. Activities are focused on tight oil reservoirs, heavy oil and oil sands, as well as LNG. Earnings from Technology were $50 million in 2016, compared with $122 million in 2015. The decrease in earnings primarily resulted from lower licensing revenues, partly offset by reduced technology program spend.

The category “Other” includes certain foreign currency transaction gains and losses, environmental costs associated with sites no longer in operation, and other costs not directly associated with an operating segment. “Other”“Other” expenses decreased 34 percent in 2016, mainly due to lower restructuring costs and favorable foreign currency impacts, partly offset by the absence of a 2015 tax benefit.

2015 vs. 2014

Net interest increased 3 percent in 2015 compared with 2014, primarily as a result of lower capitalized interest on projects completed or sold and increased debt. The 2015 net interest expense increase was largely offset by a $148 million net tax benefit for electing the fair market value method of apportioning interest expense in the United States for prior years.

Corporate general and administrative expenses increased 27 percent in 2015, mainly due to $143 million in after-tax pension settlement expense, partially offset by lower staff and compensation plan costs.

Earnings from Technology were $122 million in 2015, compared with a loss of $93 million in 2014. The increase in earnings primarily resulted from higher licensing revenues.

Other expenses increased by $82 million in 2015, mainly due to $142 million after-tax in restructuring charges and foreign currency translation impacts, partially offset by lower environmental expenses.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Financial Indicators

 

  

Millions of Dollars

Except as Indicated

   

Millions of Dollars

Except as Indicated

 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016       2015       2014    2017   2016     2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by continuing operating activities

  $          4,403       7,572       16,412  

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

   -       -       157  

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $          7,077    4,403      7,572 

Cash and cash equivalents

   3,610       2,368       5,062     6,325    3,610      2,368 

Short-term debt

   1,089       1,427       182     2,575    1,089      1,427 

Total debt

   27,275       24,880       22,565     19,703    27,275      24,880 

Total equity

   35,226       40,082       52,273     30,801    35,226      40,082 

Percent of total debt to capital*

   44      38       30     39    44      38 

Percent of floating-rate debt to total debt

        7       5     5 %    9      7 

 

    *Capital includes total debt and total equity.

To meet our short- and long-term liquidity requirements, we look to a variety of funding sources, including cash generated from operating activities. In addition, during 2016 we received $1,286 million inactivities, proceeds from asset sales, and issued $4,594 million of new debt consisting of a three-year term loan and fixed rate notes. The primary uses of our available cash were $4,869 million to support our ongoing capital expenditures and investments program; $2,251 million to repay debt; $1,253 million to pay dividends on our common stock; and $126 million to repurchase common stock. During 2016, cash and cash equivalents increased by $1,242 million, to $3,610 million.

In addition to cash flows from operating activities and proceeds from asset sales, we rely on our commercial paper and credit facility programs and our shelf registration statementstatement. In 2017, the primary uses of our available cash were $7,876 million to reduce debt; $4,591 million to support our short-ongoing capital expenditures and long-term liquidity requirements. investments program; $1,305 million to pay dividends on our common stock; $1,790 million net purchases of short-term investments; $3,000 million to repurchase our common stock; and a $600 million contribution to our domestic qualified pension plan. During 2017, cash and cash equivalents increased by $2,715 million to $6,325 million.

We believe current cash balances and cash generated by operations, together with access to external sources of funds as described below in the “Significant Sources of Capital” section, will be sufficient to meet our funding requirements in the near and long term, including our capital spending program, share repurchases, dividend payments and required debt payments.

Significant Sources of Capital

Operating Activities

During 2016,2017, cash provided by operating activities was $4,403$7,077 million, a 4261 percent decreaseincrease from 2015.2016. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to lowerhigher prices across all commodities. Cash flows from operating activities were positively impacted by the $585 million and $642 million tax refunds received from the Internal Revenue Service during 2016 and 2015, respectively.

While the stability of our cash flows from operating activities benefits from geographic diversity, our short- and long-term operating cash flows are highly dependent upon prices for crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids. Prices and margins in our industry have historically been volatile and are driven by market conditions over which we have no control. Absent other mitigating factors, as these prices and margins fluctuate, we would expect a corresponding change in our operating cash flows.

The level of absolute production volumes, as well as product and location mix, impacts our cash flows. Our 20162017 production averaged 1,5691,377 MBOED. Full-year 20172018 production is expected to be 1,5401,195 to 1,570 MBOED, which1,235 MBOED. This results in flat to 2approximately 5 percent growth compared with full-year 20162017 underlying production, excluding Libya,which excludes the impact of 1,540 MBOED when adjusted for 2016closed and planned dispositions of 27191 MBOED. Production guidance for 20172018 excludes Libya and the impact of future dispositions.Libya. Future production is subject to numerous uncertainties, including, among others, the volatile crude oil and natural gas price environment, which may impact investment decisions; the effects of price changes on production sharing and variable-royalty contracts; acquisition and disposition of fields; field production decline rates; new technologies; operating efficiencies;

timing of startups and major turnarounds; political instability; weather-related disruptions; and the addition of proved reserves through exploratory success and their timely and cost-effective development. While we actively manage these factors, production levels can cause variability in cash flows, although generally this variability has not been as significant as that caused by commodity prices.

To maintain or grow our production volumes on an ongoing basis, we must continue to add to our proved reserve base. Our total reserve replacement in 20162017 was negative 194168 percent. Our organic reserve replacement, which excludes the impact of sales and purchases, was 200 percent in 2017. Over the five-year period ended December 31, 2016,2017, our reserve replacement was 35a negative 24 percent (including 113 percent from consolidated operations) reflecting the impact of asset dispositions and lower prices and asset dispositions.prices. The total reserve replacement amount above is based on the sum of our net additions (revisions, improved recovery, purchases, extensions and discoveries, and sales) divided by our production, as shown in our reserve table disclosures. For additional information about our 20172018 capital budget, see the “2017“2018 Capital Budget” section within “Capital Resources and Liquidity” and for additional information on proved reserves, including both developed and undeveloped reserves, see the “Oil and Gas Operations” section of this report.

As discussed in the “Critical Accounting Estimates” section, engineering estimates of proved reserves are imprecise; therefore, each year reserves may be revised upward or downward due to the impact of changes in commodity prices or as more technical data becomes available on reservoirs. In 2017, revisions increased reserves, while in 2016 and 2015, revisions decreased reserves, while in 2014, revisions increased reserves. It is not possible to reliably predict how revisions will impact reserve quantities in the future.

Investing Activities

Proceeds from asset sales in 2017 were $13.9 billion. We completed the sale of our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the FCCL Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets to Cenovus Energy. Consideration for the transaction included $11.0 billion in cash after customary adjustments and 208 million Cenovus Energy common shares. We completed the sale of our interests in the San Juan Basin to an affiliate of Hilcorp Energy Company. Total proceeds for the sale was $2.5 billion in cash after customary adjustments. We also completed the sale of our interest in the Panhandle assets for $178 million in cash after customary adjustments.

Proceeds from asset dispositions in 2016 were $1.3 billion, primarily from the sales of ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V., the entity that held our 35 percent interest in three exploration blocks offshore Senegal; our 40 percent interest in South Natuna Sea Block B in Indonesia; our interest in the Alaska Beluga River Unit natural gas field in the Cook Inlet; and certain mineral andnon-mineral fee lands in northeastern Minnesota. This compares with proceeds of $2.0 billion in 2015, primarily from the sales of certain western Canadian properties; producing properties in East Texas and North Louisiana and in South Texas; a certain pipeline and gathering assets in South Texas; and our 50 percent equity method investment in the Russian joint venture, Polar Lights Company.

For additional information on our dispositions and investment in Cenovus common shares, see Note 6—4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or SoldAcquired and Note 6—Investment in Cenovus Energy, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and the OutlookResults of Operations section within Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Commercial Paper and Credit Facilities

On March 28, 2016, we reduced ourWe have a revolving credit facility totaling $6.75 billion, expiring in June 2019, from $7.0 billion to $6.75 billion.2019. Our revolving credit facility may be used for direct bank borrowings, the issuance of letters of credit totaling up to $500 million, or as support for our commercial paper programs. The revolving credit facility is broadly syndicated among financial institutions and does not contain any material adverse change provisions or any covenants requiring maintenance of specified financial ratios or credit ratings. The facility agreement contains a cross-default provision relating to the failure to pay principal or interest on other debt obligations of $200 million or more by ConocoPhillips, or any of its consolidated subsidiaries.

Credit facility borrowings may bear interest at a margin above rates offered by certain designated banks in the London interbank market or at a margin above the overnight federal funds rate or prime rates offered by certain designated banks in the United States. The agreement calls for commitment fees on available, but unused, amounts. The agreement also contains early termination rights if our current directors or their approved successors cease to be a majority of the Board of Directors.

Our primary funding source for short-term working capital needs is theWe have two commercial paper programs. The ConocoPhillips $6.25 billion commercial paper program. Commercial paper maturities are generally limitedprogram is available to 90 days.fund short-term working capital needs. We also have the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. $500 million commercial paper program, which is used to fund commitments relating to QG3. At bothCommercial paper maturities are generally limited to 90 days. We had no commercial paper outstanding at December 31, 2017 or 2016, and 2015, weunder either the ConocoPhillips or the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. commercial paper

program. We had no direct borrowings or letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility. Under the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. commercial paper programs, no commercial paper was outstanding at December 31, 2016, compared with $803 million at December 31, 2015. Since we had no commercial paper outstanding and had issued no letters of credit, we had access to $6.75 billion in borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility at December 31, 2016.

2017.

Due to the significant decline in commodity prices during 2015, and the expectation these prices could remain depressed in the near future, the major ratings agencies conducted a review of the oil and gas industry. As a result of this review, our credit ratings, along with several other companies in the oil and gas industry, were downgraded. In the first quarter of 2016, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded2017, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s reflected an improvement in their outlook for our senior long-term debt ratingsfrom “negative” to “Baa2” from “A2,” with a negative outlook“stable” and our short-term commercial paper ratings to “Prime 2” from “Prime 1” and Fitch downgradedaffirmed our long-term debt ratingsrating at“A-.” In January 2018, Fitch further improved their outlook for our debt from “stable” to “A-“positive.After improving their outlook for our debt from “A”“negative” to “positive” in the first quarter of 2017, Moody’s Investor Services upgraded our long-term debt rating from “Baa2” to “Baa1” with a negativestable outlook and our short-term commercial paper ratings to “F2” from “F1.” Inin the secondthird quarter of 2016, Standard and Poor’s downgraded2017 in response to our senior long-term debt ratings to “A-” from “A,” with a negative outlook and our short-term commercial paper ratings to “A-2” from “A-1.”reduction. We do not have any ratings triggers on any of our corporate debt that would cause an automatic default, and thereby impact our access to liquidity, in the event of a further downgrade of our credit rating. If our credit rating were downgraded, further, it could increase the cost of corporate debt available to us and restrict our access to the commercial paper.paper markets. If our credit rating were to deteriorate to a level prohibiting us from accessing the commercial paper market, we would still be able to access funds under our revolving credit facility.

Certain of our project-related contracts, commercial contracts and derivative instruments contain provisions requiring us to post collateral. Many of these contracts and instruments permit us to post either cash or letters of credit as collateral. At December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, we had direct bank letters of credit of $304$338 million and $340$304 million, respectively, which secured performance obligations related to various purchase commitments incident to the ordinary conduct of business. In the event of further credit ratings downgrades, we may be required to post additional letters of credit.

Shelf Registration

We have a universal shelf registration statement on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under which we, as a well-known seasoned issuer, have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As part of our normal ongoing business operations and consistent with normal industry practice, we enter into numerous agreements with other parties to pursue business opportunities, which share costs and apportion risks among the parties as governed by the agreements.

For information about guarantees, see Note 12—11—Guarantees, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Capital Requirements

For information about our capital expenditures and investments, see the “Capital Expenditures” section.

Our debt balance at December 31, 2016,2017, was $27.3$19.7 billion, an increasea decrease of $2.4$7.6 billion from the balance at December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of obtaining a $1.62016.

In 2017, two notes totaling $1,001 million were paid at maturity, including the $1.0 billion three-year1.05% Notes due 2017. Also in 2017, we prepaid the $1,450 million term loan facility due in 2019. We also redeemed a total $5.0 billion of debt, described below, incurring $301 million in premiums above book value, which are reported in the “Other expense” line on our consolidated income statement.

6.65% Debentures due 2018 with principal of $297 million.
5.20% Notes due 2018 with principal of $500 million.
1.5% Notes due 2018 with principal of $750 million.
5.75% Notes due 2019 with principal of $2.25 billion.
6.00% Notes due 2020 with principal of $1.0 billion.
4.20% Notes due 2021 with principal of $1.25 billion (partial redemption of $250 million).

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we gave notice to redeem the following debt instruments totaling $2.25 billion.

2.2% Notes due 2020 with principal of $500 million.
4.20% Notes due 2021 with remaining principal of $1.0 billion.
2.875% Notes due 2021 with principal of $750 million.

The prepayments occurred on January 22, 2018, and we incurred premiums above book value of $75 million.

On a longer-term basis our debt target is $15 billion byyear-end 2019. In the issuance of $3.0 billionfuture, we may redeem other debt instruments or purchase debt instruments in new fixed rate notes, both in March 2016, partly offset by the retirement in October 2016 of the $1,250 million of 5.625% Notesopen market or otherwise, as we seek to achieve this target. Any such redemptions or purchases would be subject to market conditions and other factors, and may be conducted or discontinued at maturity, the $803 million repayment of outstanding commercial paper, and early repayment of $150 million of our term loan. Our short-term debt balance at December 31, 2016, decreased $338 million compared with December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of the timing of scheduled maturities.any time without prior notice. For more information on Debt, see Note 11—10—Debt, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

To preserve our balance sheet strength and provide financial flexibility through the recent downturn, in the first quarter of 2016,On January 31, 2017, we announced a reduction6 percent increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.25$0.265 per share. The dividend was paid March 1, 2016, to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 16, 2016. In July 2016, we announced a dividend of $0.25 per share. The dividend was paid September 1, 2016, to stockholders of record at the close of business on July 25, 2016. In October 2016, we announced a dividend of $0.25 per share. The dividend was paid December 1, 2016, to stockholders of record at the close of business on October 17, 2016.

Additionally, on January 31, 2017, we announced an increase to our quarterly dividend of 6 percent, from $0.25 per share to $0.265 per share. The dividend will be paid March 1, 2017, to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 14, 2017. On May 5, 2017, we announced a quarterly dividend of $0.265 per share. The dividend was paid on June 1, 2017, to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 15, 2017. On July 12, 2017, we announced a quarterly dividend of $0.265 per share. The dividend was paid on September 1, 2017, to stockholders of record at the close of business on July 24, 2017.On October 6, 2017, we announced a quarterly dividend of $0.265 per share which was paid on December 1, 2017, to stockholders of record at the close of business on October 16, 2017. Additionally, on February 1, 2018, we announced an increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.285 per share, compared with the previous quarterly dividend of $0.265 per share. The dividend is payable on March 1, 2018, to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 12, 2018.

On November 10, 2016, we announced plans to purchase up to $3 billion of our common stock overthrough 2019. On March 29, 2017, we announced plans to double our share repurchase program to $6 billion of common stock through 2019, with $3 billion allocated and purchased in 2017, and the next three years. Repurchaseremainder allocated evenly to 2018 and 2019. On February 1, 2018, we announced the acceleration of sharesour previously stated 2018 share repurchases from $1.5 billion to $2.0 billion, with the remaining balance to be repurchased in 2019. Since our share repurchase program began in November and totaled 2,579,0982016, we have repurchased 66 million shares at a cost of $126 million,$3.1 billion through December 31, 2016.2017.

In addition to our previously announced share repurchase program above, we are currently planning to purchase up to an additional $1.5 billion of our common stock through 2020. Whether we undertake these additional repurchases is ultimately subject to numerous considerations, including Board authorization, market conditions and other factors. See Risk Factors “Our ability to declare and pay dividends and repurchase shares is subject to certain considerations.”

During the third quarter of 2017, we made a $600 million contribution to our domestic qualified pension plan, which is included in the “Other” line in the “Cash Flows From Operating Activities” section of our

consolidated statement of cash flows. This additional contribution significantly lowers our domestic pension deficit which will reduce future premiums charged by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. It also mitigates the need for contributions in future quarters.

Contractual Obligations

The following table below summarizes our aggregate contractual fixed and variable obligations as of December 31, 2016:2017:

 

   Millions of Dollars     Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Payments Due by Period     Payments Due by Period 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Total     
 
Up to 1
Year
  
  
   

 

Years

2–3

  

  

   

 

Years

4–5

  

  

   
 
After
5 Years
  
  
   Total    
Up to 1
Year
 
 
   
Years
2–3
 
 
   
Years
4–5
 
 
   
After
5 Years
 
 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Debt obligations (a)

  $        26,423     1,005     5,542     3,689     16,187    $        18,929    2,508    63    1,706    14,652 

Capital lease obligations (b)

   852     84     136     139     493     774    67    147    132    428 

 

 

Total debt

   27,275     1,089     5,678     3,828     16,680     19,703    2,575    210    1,838    15,080 

 

 

Interest on debt and other obligations

   15,765     1,318     2,371     1,964     10,112     13,884    955    1,881    1,834    9,214 

Operating lease obligations (c)

   1,626     277     410     504     435     1,548    278    628    433    209 

Purchase obligations (d)

         22,791     15,581     2,259     1,304     3,647           10,102    4,210    1,833    945    3,114 

Other long-term liabilities

                    

Pension and postretirement benefit contributions (e)

   1,628     430     635     563          1,312    210    491    611     

Asset retirement obligations (f)

   8,405     202     546     697     6,960     7,798    251    687    575    6,285 

Accrued environmental costs (g)

   247     25     46     42     134     180    25    36    29    90 

Unrecognized tax benefits (h)

   42     42     (h)     (h)     (h)     51    51    (h)    (h)    (h) 

 

 

Total

  $77,779     18,964     11,945     8,902     37,968    $54,578    8,555    5,766    6,265    33,992 

 

 

 

(a)Includes $248$252 million of net unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs. See Note 11—10—Debt, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

 

(b)Capital lease obligations are presented on a discounted basis.

 

(c)Operating lease obligations are presented on an undiscounted basis.

 

(d)Represents any agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding and that specifies all significant terms, presented on an undiscounted basis. Does not include purchase commitments for jointly owned fields and facilities where we are not the operator.

The majority of the purchase obligations are market-based contracts related to our commodity business. Product purchase commitments with third parties totaled $4,673$3,487 million.

Purchase obligations of $6,232$5,443 million are related to agreements to access and utilize the capacity of third-party equipment and facilities, including pipelines and LNG and product terminals, to transport, process, treat and store commodities. The remainder is primarily our net share of purchase commitments for materials and services for jointly owned fields and facilities where we are the operator.

(e)Represents contributions to qualified and nonqualified pension and postretirement benefit plans for the years 20172018 through 2021.2022. For additional information related to expected benefit payments subsequent to 2021,2022, see Note 18—17—Employee Benefit Plans, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(f)Represents estimated discounted costs to retire and remove long-lived assets at the end of their operations.

 

(g)Represents estimated costs for accrued environmental expenditures presented on a discounted basis for costs acquired in various business combinations and an undiscounted basis for all other accrued environmental costs.

 

(h)Excludes unrecognized tax benefits of $341$831 million because the ultimate disposition and timing of any payments to be made with regard to such amounts are not reasonably estimable. Although unrecognized tax benefits are not a contractual obligation, they are presented in this table because they represent potential demands on our liquidity.

Capital Expenditures

Capital Expenditures

  
   Millions of Dollars     Millions of Dollars 
   2016     2015     2014     2017    2016    2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Alaska

  $883     1,352     1,564    $815    883    1,352 

Lower 48

   1,262     3,765     6,054     2,136    1,262    3,765 

Canada

   698     1,255     2,340     202    698    1,255 

Europe and North Africa

   1,020     1,573     2,540     872    1,020    1,573 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   838     1,812     3,877     482    838    1,812 

Other International

   104     173     520     21    104    173 

Corporate and Other

   64     120     190     63    64    120 

 

 

Capital expenditures and investments from continuing operations

   4,869     10,050     17,085  

 

Discontinued operations in Nigeria

   -     -     59  

 

Capital Program

  $        4,869             10,050     17,144    $        4,591            4,869    10,050 

 

 

Our capital expenditures and investments from continuing operations for the three-year period ended December 31, 2016,2017, totaled $32$19.5 billion. The 20162017 expenditures supported key exploration and developments, primarily:

 

Oil and natural gas development and exploration and appraisal activities in the Lower 48, including Eagle Ford, Bakken, and the Permian Basin.
In Europe, development activitiesBasin, the Niobrara in the Clair Ridge, Greater Ekofisk, Aasta Hansteen,Denver-Julesburg Basin and Greater Britannia areas, and exploration and appraisal activities in the North Sea.several emerging plays.
Alaska activities related to development in the Western North Slope, Greater Kuparuk Area, and the Greater Prudhoe Area and the Western North Slope, and explorationArea.
Development activities in Europe, including the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.Greater Ekofisk Area, Clair Ridge, Aasta Hansteen, and Heidrun.
Major project expenditures associated with the APLNG joint venture in Australia.
OilContinued oil sands development in Canada.
Exploration and appraisal drilling in deepwater Gulf of Mexico.
Exploration activities in offshore Nova Scotia and appraisal activities in westernliquids-rich plays in Canada.
Continued development in Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Malaysia and Indonesia, and exploration andAustralia; appraisal activity in SenegalAustralia and Chile.exploration activity in Malaysia.

20172018 CAPITAL BUDGET

In 2016, given our view of greater price volatility,November 2017, we announced a plan for allocating cash across the business which sets annual capital at a level that maintains flat production volumes. Our 20172018 capital budget of $5$5.5 billion, reaffirms this strategy. We have shifted ourincluding $3.5 billion of sustaining capital allocation to focus on value-preserving, shorter cycle time and low cost-of-supply$2 billion in accretive, short-cycle unconventional programs, in our resource base.future major projects and exploration activities.

We are planning to allocate approximately:

 

4651 percent of our 20172018 capital expenditures budget to development drilling programs. These funds will focus predominantly on the Lower 48 unconventionals including the Eagle Ford, Bakken and Bakken,Permian, as well as development drilling in Australia/Timor-Leste, Norway Alaska and Canada.Alaska.

2618 percent of our 20172018 capital expenditures budget to maintain base production and corporate expenditures.
17 percent of our 2018 capital expenditures budget to major projects. These funds will focus on major projects in China, Alaska, China, Europe and Malaysia, as well as APLNG in Australia.Malaysia.
158 percent of our 20172018 capital expenditures budget to maintain base productionnew exploration activity, primarily in Alaska and corporate expenditures.the Lower 48.
136 percent of our 20172018 capital expenditures budget to explorationdevelopment appraisal, including the Lower 48, Canada and appraisal activity. These funds will primarily target the Permian and Niobrara, Colombia, Chile, Australia and Canada.Alaska.

For information on proved undeveloped reserves and the associated costs to develop these reserves, see the “Oil and Gas Operations” section.

Contingencies

A number of lawsuits involving a variety of claims arising in the ordinary course of business have been filed against ConocoPhillips. We also may be required to remove or mitigate the effects on the environment of the placement, storage, disposal or release of certain chemical, mineral and petroleum substances at various active and inactive sites. We regularly assess the need for accounting recognition or disclosure of these contingencies. In the case of all known contingencies (other than those related to income taxes), we accrue a liability when the loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not reduce these liabilities for potential insurance or third-party recoveries. If applicable, we accrue receivables for probable insurance or other third-party recoveries. With respect to income tax related contingencies, we use a cumulative probability-weighted loss accrual in cases where sustaining a tax position is less than certain.

Based on currently available information, we believe it is remote that future costs related to known contingent liability exposures will exceed current accruals by an amount that would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. For information on other contingencies, see “Critical Accounting Estimates” and Note 13—12—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Legal and Tax Matters

We are subject to various lawsuits and claims including but not limited to matters involving oil and gas royalty and severance tax payments, gas measurement and valuation methods, contract disputes, environmental damages, personal injury, and property damage. Our primary exposures for such matters relate to alleged royalty and tax underpayments on certain federal, state and privately owned properties and claims of alleged environmental contamination from historic operations. We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously in these matters.

Our legal organization applies its knowledge, experience and professional judgment to the specific characteristics of our cases, employing a litigation management process to manage and monitor the legal proceedings against us. Our process facilitates the early evaluation and quantification of potential exposures in individual cases. This process also enables us to track those cases that have been scheduled for trial and/or mediation. Based on professional judgment and experience in using these litigation management tools and available information about current developments in all our cases, our legal organization regularly assesses the

adequacy of current accruals and determines if adjustment of existing accruals, or establishment of new accruals, is required. See Note 19—18—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information about incometax-related contingencies.

Environmental

We are subject to the same numerous international, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations as other companies in our industry. The most significant of these environmental laws and regulations include, among others, the:

 

U.S. Federal Clean Air Act, which governs air emissions.
U.S. Federal Clean Water Act, which governs discharges to water bodies.
European Union Regulation for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH).
U.S. Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)(CERCLA or Superfund), which imposes liability on generators, transporters and arrangers of hazardous substances at sites where hazardous substance releases have occurred or are threatening to occur.
U.S. Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which governs the treatment, storage and disposal of solid waste.
U.S. Federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA90), under which owners and operators of onshore facilities and pipelines, lessees or permittees of an area in which an offshore facility is located, and owners and operators of vessels are liable for removal costs and damages that result from a discharge of oil into navigable waters of the United States.
U.S. Federal Emergency Planning and CommunityRight-to-Know Act (EPCRA), which requires facilities to report toxic chemical inventories with local emergency planning committees and response departments.
U.S. Federal Safe Drinking Water Act, which governs the disposal of wastewater in underground injection wells.
U.S. Department of the Interior regulations, which relate to offshore oil and gas operations in U.S. waters and impose liability for the cost of pollution cleanup resulting from operations, as well as potential liability for pollution damages.
European Union Trading Directive resulting in European Emissions Trading Scheme.

These laws and their implementing regulations set limits on emissions and, in the case of discharges to water, establish water quality limits. They also, in most cases, require permits in association with new or modified operations. These permits can require an applicant to collect substantial information in connection with the application process, which can be expensive and time consuming. In addition, there can be delays associated with notice and comment periods and the agency’s processing of the application. Many of the delays associated with the permitting process are beyond the control of the applicant.

Many states and foreign countries where we operate also have, or are developing, similar environmental laws and regulations governing these same types of activities. While similar, in some cases these regulations may impose additional, or more stringent, requirements that can add to the cost and difficulty of marketing or transporting products across state and international borders.

The ultimate financial impact arising from environmental laws and regulations is neither clearly known nor easily determinable as new standards, such as air emission standards, water quality standards and stricter fuel regulations, continue to evolve. However, environmental laws and regulations, including those that may arise to address concerns about global climate change, are expected to continue to have an increasing impact on our operations in the United States and in other countries in which we operate. Notable areas of potential impacts include air emission compliance and remediation obligations in the United States and Canada.

An example is the use of hydraulic fracturing, an essential completion technique that facilitates production of oil and natural gas otherwise trapped in lower permeability rock formations. A range of local, state, federal or national laws and regulations currently govern hydraulic fracturing operations, with hydraulic fracturing currently prohibited in some jurisdictions.

Although hydraulic fracturing has been conducted for many decades, a number of new laws, regulations and permitting requirements are under consideration by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, and others which could result in increased costs, operating restrictions, operational delays and/or limit the ability to develop oil and natural gas

resources. Governmental restrictions on hydraulic fracturing could impact the overall profitability or viability of certain of our oil and natural gas investments. We have adopted operating principles that incorporate established industry standards designed to meet or exceed government requirements. Our practices continually evolve as technology improves and regulations change.

We also are subject to certain laws and regulations relating to environmental remediation obligations associated with current and past operations. Such laws and regulations include CERCLA and RCRA and their state equivalents. Longer-term expenditures are subject to considerable uncertainty and may fluctuate significantly.

We occasionally receive requests for information or notices of potential liability from the EPA and state environmental agencies alleging we are a potentially responsible party under CERCLA or an equivalent state statute. On occasion, we also have been made a party to cost recovery litigation by those agencies or by private parties. These requests, notices and lawsuits assert potential liability for remediation costs at various sites that typically are not owned by us, but allegedly contain wastes attributable to our past operations. As of December 31, 2016,2017, there were 14 sites around the United States in which we were identified as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA and comparable state laws.

For most Superfund sites, our potential liability will be significantly less than the total site remediation costs because the percentage of waste attributable to us, versus that attributable to all other potentially responsible parties, is relatively low. Although liability of those potentially responsible is generally joint and several for federal sites and frequently so for state sites, other potentially responsible parties at sites where we are a party typically have had the financial strength to meet their obligations, and where they have not, or where potentially responsible parties could not be located, our share of liability has not increased materially. Many of the sites at which we are potentially responsible are still under investigation by the EPA or the state agencies concerned. Prior to actual cleanup, those potentially responsible normally assess site conditions, apportion responsibility and determine the appropriate remediation. In some instances, we may have no liability or attain a settlement of liability. Actual cleanup costs generally occur after the parties obtain EPA or equivalent state agency approval. There are relatively few sites where we are a major participant, and given the timing and amounts of anticipated expenditures, neither the cost of remediation at those sites nor such costs at all CERCLA sites, in the aggregate, is expected to have a material adverse effect on our competitive or financial condition.

Expensed environmental costs were $435$398 million in 20162017 and are expected to be about $470$451 million per year in 20172018 and 2018.2019. Capitalized environmental costs were $192$170 million in 20162017 and are expected to be about $275$223 million per year in 20172018 and 2018.2019.

Accrued liabilities for remediation activities are not reduced for potential recoveries from insurers or other third parties and are not discounted (except those assumed in a purchase business combination, which we do record on a discounted basis).

Many of these liabilities result from CERCLA, RCRA and similar state or international laws that require us to undertake certain investigative and remedial activities at sites where we conduct, or once conducted, operations or at sites where ConocoPhillips-generated waste was disposed. The accrual also includes a number of sites we identified that may require environmental remediation, but which are not currently the subject of CERCLA, RCRA or other agency enforcement activities. If applicable, we accrue receivables for probable insurance or other third-party recoveries. In the future, we may incur significant costs under both CERCLA and RCRA.

Remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site, depending on the mix of unique site characteristics, evolving remediation technologies, diverse regulatory agencies and enforcement policies, and the presence or absence of potentially liable third parties. Therefore, it is difficult to develop reasonable estimates of future site remediation costs.

At December 31, 2016,2017, our balance sheet included total accrued environmental costs of $247$180 million, compared with $258$247 million at December 31, 2015,2016, for remediation activities in the U.S. and Canada. We expect to incur a substantial amount of these expenditures within the next 30 years.

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, and as with other companies engaged in similar businesses, environmental costs and liabilities are inherent concerns in our operations and products, and there can be no assurance that material costs and liabilities will not be incurred. However, we currently do not expect any material adverse effect upon our results of operations or financial position as a result of compliance with current environmental laws and regulations.

Climate Change

There has been a broad range of proposed or promulgated state, national and international laws focusing on greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction. These proposed or promulgated laws apply or could apply in countries where we have interests or may have interests in the future. Laws in this field continue to evolve, and while it is not possible to accurately estimate either a timetable for implementation or our future compliance costs relating to implementation, such laws, if enacted, could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Examples of legislation or precursors for possible regulation that do or could affect our operations include:

 

European Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), the program through which many of the European Union (EU) member states are implementing the Kyoto Protocol. Our cost of compliance with the EU ETS in 20162017 was approximately $1.4$1.5 million (net sharebefore-tax).
The Alberta Specified Gas Emitter regulations require any existing facility with emissions equal to or greater than 100,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide or equivalent per year to reduce its net emissions intensity from its baseline. The reduction requirement increased from 12 percent in 2015, to 15 percent in 2016 and will increase again to 20 percent in 2017. We also incur a carbon tax for emissions from fossil fuel combustion in our British Columbia operations. The total cost of compliance with these regulations in 20162017 was approximately $8$3 million.
  The U.S. Supreme Court decision inMassachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 127 S.Ct. 1438 (2007), confirming that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide as an “air pollutant” under the Federal Clean Air Act.
The U.S. EPA’s announcement on March 29, 2010 (published as “Interpretation of Regulations that Determine Pollutants Covered by Clean Air Act Permitting Programs,” 75 Fed. Reg. 17004 (April 2, 2010)), and the EPA’s and U.S. Department of Transportation’s joint promulgation of a Final Rule on April 1, 2010, that triggers regulation of GHGs under the Clean Air Act, may trigger more climate-based claims for damages, and may result in longer agency review time for development projects.
The U.S. EPA’s announcement on January 14, 2015, outlining a series of steps it plans to take to address methane and smog-forming volatile organic compound emissions from the oil and gas industry. The former U.S. administration established a goal of reducing the 2012 levels in methane emissions from the oil and gas industry by 40 to 45 percent by 2025.
Carbon taxes in certain jurisdictions. Our cost of compliance with Norwegian carbon tax legislation in 20162017 was approximately $28$29 million (net sharebefore-tax). We also incur a carbon tax for emissions from fossil fuel combustion in our British Columbia and Alberta Operations totaling just over $1 million (net sharebefore-tax).
The agreement reached in Paris in December 2015 at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change, setting out a new process for achieving global emission reductions.

In the United States, some additional form of regulation may be forthcoming in the future at the federal and state levels with respect to GHG emissions. Such regulation could take any of several forms that may result in the creation of additional costs in the form of taxes, the restriction of output, investments of capital to maintain compliance with laws and regulations, or required acquisition or trading of emission allowances.

We are working to continuously improve operational and energy efficiency through resource and energy conservation throughout our operations.

Compliance with changes in laws and regulations that create a GHG tax, emission trading scheme or GHG reduction policies could significantly increase our costs, reduce demand for fossil energy derived products, impact the cost and availability of capital and increase our exposure to litigation. Such laws and regulations could also increase demand for less carbon intensive energy sources, including natural gas. The ultimate impact on our financial performance, either positive or negative, will depend on a number of factors, including but not limited to:

 

Whether and to what extent legislation or regulation is enacted.
The timing of the introduction of such legislation or regulation.
The nature of the legislation (such as a cap and trade system or a tax on emissions) or regulation.
The price placed on GHG emissions (either by the market or through a tax).
The GHG reductions required.
The price and availability of offsets.
The amount and allocation of allowances.
Technological and scientific developments leading to new products or services.
Any potential significant physical effects of climate change (such as increased severe weather events, changes in sea levels and changes in temperature).
Whether, and the extent to which, increased compliance costs are ultimately reflected in the prices of our products and services.

The company has responded by putting in place a corporate Climate Change Action Plan, together with individual business unit climate change management plans in order to undertake actions in four major areas:

 

Equipping the company for a low emission world, for example by integrating GHG forecasting and reporting into company procedures; utilizing GHG pricing in planning economics; and developing systems to handle GHG market transactions.
Reducing GHG emissions—In 2015,2016, the company reduced or avoided GHG emissions by approximately 566,000114,000 metric tonnes by carrying out a range of programs across a number ofour business units. In 2017, we set a long-term target to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions intensity between 5 percent and 15 percent by 2030 from a 2017 baseline. Setting such a target demonstrates our continuing systematic approach to managing climate-related risks throughout the business.
Evaluating business opportunities such as the creation of offsets and allowances, the use of low carbon energy and the development of low carbon technologies.
Engaging externally—The company is a sponsor of MIT’s Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change; constructively engages in the development of climate change legislation and regulation; and discloses our progress and performance through the Carbon Disclosure Project and the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.

The company uses an estimated market cost of GHG emissions in the range of $9 to $43$40 per metric tonne depending on the timing and country or region to evaluate future projects and opportunities.

In 2017 and early 2018, cities and/or counties in California and New York have filed lawsuits against oil and gas companies, including ConocoPhillips, seeking compensatory damages and equitable relief to abate alleged climate change impacts. ConocoPhillips will be vigorously defending against these lawsuits.

Other

We have deferred tax assets related to certain accrued liabilities, loss carryforwards and credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances have been established to reduce these deferred tax assets to an amount that will, more likely than not, be realized. Based on our historical taxable income, our expectations for the future, and availabletax-planning strategies, management expects the net deferred tax assets will be realized as offsets to reversing deferred tax liabilities and as offsets to the tax consequences of future taxable income.liabilities.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)No. 2016-02, “Leases” (ASUNo. 2016-02), which establishes comprehensive accounting and financial reporting requirements for leasing arrangements. This ASU supersedes the existing requirements in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 840, “Leases,” and requires lessees to recognize substantially all lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. The provisions of ASUNo. 2016-02 also modify the definition of a lease and outline requirements for recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leasing arrangements by both lessees and lessors. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption of the standard is permitted. Entities are required to adopt the ASU using a modified retrospective approach, subject to certain optional practical expedients, and apply the provisions of ASUNo. 2016-02 to leasing arrangements existing at or entered into after the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. While weIn January 2018, ASUNo. 2016-02 was amended by the provisions of ASUNo. 2018-01, “Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842.” We plan to adopt ASUNo. 2016-02, as amended, effective January 1, 2019, and continue to evaluate the ASU to determine the impact of adoption on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures, accounting policies and systems, business processes, and internal controls. We also continue to monitor proposals issued by the FASB to clarify the ASU and certain industry implementation issues. While our evaluation of ASUNo. 2016-02 and related implementation activities are ongoing, we expect the adoption of the ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures. For additional information, see Note 25—24—New Accounting Standards, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to select appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. See Note 1—Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for descriptions of our major accounting policies. Certain of these accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent there is a reasonable likelihood materially different amounts would have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used. These critical accounting estimates are discussed with the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors at least annually. We believe the following discussions of critical accounting estimates, along with the discussions of contingencies and of deferred tax asset valuation allowances in this report, address all important accounting areas where the nature of accounting estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change.

Oil and Gas Accounting

Accounting for oil and gas exploratory activity is subject to special accounting rules unique to the oil and gas industry. The acquisition of geological and geophysical seismic information, prior to the discovery of proved reserves, is expensed as incurred, similar to accounting for research and development costs. However, leasehold acquisition costs and exploratory well costs are capitalized on the balance sheet pending determination of whether proved oil and gas reserves have been discovered on the prospect.

Property Acquisition Costs

For individually significant leaseholds, management periodically assesses for impairment based on exploration and drilling efforts to date. For relatively small individual leasehold acquisition costs, management exercises judgment and determines a percentage probability that the prospect ultimately will fail to find proved oil and gas reserves and pools that leasehold information with others in the geographic area. For prospects in areas with limited, or no, previous exploratory drilling, the percentage probability of ultimate failure is normally judged to be quite high. This judgmental percentage is multiplied by the leasehold acquisition cost, and that product is divided by the contractual period of the leasehold to determine a periodic leasehold impairment charge that is reported in exploration expense.

This judgmental probability percentage is reassessed and adjusted throughout the contractual period of the leasehold based on favorable or unfavorable exploratory activity on the leasehold or on adjacent leaseholds, and leasehold impairment amortization expense is adjusted prospectively. Atyear-end 2016, 2017, the book value of the pools of property acquisition costs, that individually are relatively small and thus subject to the above-described periodic leasehold impairment calculation, was $404$503 million and the accumulated impairment reserve was $197$130 million.

The weighted-average judgmental percentage probability of ultimate failure was approximately 6957 percent, and the weighted-average amortization period was approximately twothree years. If that judgmental percentage were to be raised by 5 percent across all calculations,before-tax leasehold impairment expense in 20172018 would increase by approximately $5$6 million. Atyear-end 2016, 2017, the remaining $3,659$3,249 million of net capitalized unproved property costs consisted primarily of individually significant leaseholds, mineral rights held in perpetuity by title ownership, exploratory wells currently being drilled, suspended exploratory wells, and capitalized interest. Of this amount, approximately $2.5$2.4 billion is concentrated in nine major development areas, the majority of which are not expected to move to proved properties in 2017.2018. Management periodically assesses individually significant leaseholds for impairment based on the results of exploration and drilling efforts and the outlook for commercialization.

Exploratory Costs

For exploratory wells, drilling costs are temporarily capitalized, or “suspended,” on the balance sheet, pending a determination of whether potentially economic oil and gas reserves have been discovered by the drilling effort to justify development.

If exploratory wells encounter potentially economic quantities of oil and gas, the well costs remain capitalized on the balance sheet as long as sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project is being made. The accounting notion of “sufficient progress” is a judgmental area, but the accounting rules do prohibit continued capitalization of suspended well costs on the expectation future market conditions will improve or new technologies will be found that would make the development economically profitable. Often, the ability to move into the development phase and record proved reserves is dependent on obtaining permits and government orco-venturer approvals, the timing of which is ultimately beyond our control. Exploratory well costs remain suspended as long as we are actively pursuing such approvals and permits, and believe they will be obtained. Once all required approvals and permits have been obtained, the projects are moved into the development phase, and the oil and gas reserves are designated as proved reserves. For complex exploratory discoveries, it is not unusual to have exploratory wells remain suspended on the balance sheet for several years while we perform additional appraisal drilling and seismic work on the potential oil and gas field or while we seek government orco-venturer approval of development plans or seek environmental permitting. Once a determination is made the well did not encounter potentially economic oil and gas quantities, the well costs are expensed as a dry hole and reported in exploration expense.

Management reviews suspended well balances quarterly, continuously monitors the results of the additional appraisal drilling and seismic work, and expenses the suspended well costs as a dry hole when it determines the potential field does not warrant further investment in the near term. Criteria utilized in making this determination include evaluation of the reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon properties, expected development costs, ability to apply existing technology to produce the reserves, fiscal terms, regulations or contract negotiations, and our expected return on investment.

Atyear-end 2016, 2017, total suspended well costs were $1,063$853 million, compared with $1,260$1,063 million atyear-end 2015. 2016. For additional information on suspended wells, including an aging analysis, see Note 8—7—Suspended Wells and Other Exploration Expenses, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Proved Reserves

Engineering estimates of the quantities of proved reserves are inherently imprecise and represent only approximate amounts because of the judgments involved in developing such information. Reserve estimates are based on geological and engineering assessments ofin-place hydrocarbon volumes, the production plan, historical extraction recovery and processing yield factors, installed plant operating capacity and approved operating limits. The reliability of these estimates at any point in time depends on both the quality and quantity of the technical and economic data and the efficiency of extracting and processing the hydrocarbons.

Despite the inherent imprecision in these engineering estimates, accounting rules require disclosure of “proved” reserve estimates due to the importance of these estimates to better understand the perceived value and future cash flows of a company’s operations. There are several authoritative guidelines regarding the engineering criteria that must be met before estimated reserves can be designated as “proved.”

Our geosciences and reservoir engineering organization has policies and procedures in place consistent with these authoritative guidelines. We have trained and experienced internal engineering personnel who estimate our proved reserves held by consolidated companies, as well as our share of equity affiliates.

Proved reserve estimates are adjusted annually in the fourth quarter and during the year if significant changes occur, and take into account recent production and subsurface information about each field. Also, as required by current authoritative guidelines, the estimated future date when an asset will be permanently shut down for economic reasons is based on12-month average prices and current costs. This estimated date when production will end affects the amount of estimated reserves. Therefore, as prices and cost levels change from year to year, the estimate of proved reserves also changes. Generally, our proved reserves decrease as prices decline and increase as prices rise.

Our proved reserves include estimated quantities related to production sharing contracts, reported under the “economic interest” method, as well as variable-royalty regimes, and are subject to fluctuations in commodity prices; recoverable operating expenses; and capital costs. If costs remain stable, reserve quantities attributable to recovery of costs will change inversely to changes in commodity prices. We would expect reserves from these contracts to decrease when product prices rise and increase when prices decline.

The estimation of proved developed reserves also is important to the income statement because the proved developed reserve estimate for a field serves as the denominator in theunit-of-production calculation of the DD&A of the capitalized costs for that asset. Atyear-end 2016, 2017, the net book value of productive properties, plants and equipment (PP&E) subject to aunit-of-production calculation was approximately $60$41 billion and the DD&A recorded on these assets in 20162017 was approximately $8.6$6.4 billion. The estimated proved developed reserves for our consolidated operations were 4.0 billion BOE at the end of 2015 and 3.7 billion BOE at the end of 2016.2016 and 3.0 billion BOE at the end of 2017. If the estimates of proved reserves used in theunit-of-production calculations had been lower by 10 percent across all calculations,before-tax DD&A in 20162017 would have increased by an estimated $955$726 million.

Impairments

Long-lived assets used in operations are assessed for impairment whenever changes in facts and circumstances indicate a possible significant deterioration in future cash flows expected to be generated by an asset group and annually in the fourth quarter following updates to corporate planning assumptions. If there is an indication the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered, the asset is monitored by management through an established process where changes to significant assumptions such as prices, volumes and future development plans are reviewed. If, upon review, the sum of the undiscountedbefore-tax cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset group, the carrying value is written down to estimated fair value. Individual assets are grouped for impairment purposes based on a judgmental assessment of the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets—generally on afield-by-field basis for exploration and production assets. Because there usually is a lack of quoted market prices for long-lived assets, the fair value of impaired assets is typically determined based on the present values of expected future cash flows using discount rates believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants, or based on a multiple of operating cash flow validated with historical market transactions of similar assets where possible. The expected future cash flows used for impairment reviews and related fair value calculations are based on judgmental assessments of future production volumes, commodity prices, operating costs and capital decisions, considering all available information at the date of review. Differing assumptions could affect the timing and the amount of an impairment in any period. See Note 9—8—Impairments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Investments in nonconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method are reviewed for impairment when there is evidence of a loss in value and annually following updates to corporate planning assumptions. Such evidence of a loss in value might include our inability to recover the carrying amount, the lack of sustained earnings capacity which would justify the current investment amount, or a current fair value less than the investment’s carrying amount. When it is determined such a loss in value is other than temporary, an impairment charge is recognized for the difference between the investment’s carrying value and its estimated fair value.

When determining whether a decline in value is other than temporary, management considers factors such as the length of time and extent of the decline, the investee’s financial condition and near-term prospects, and our ability and intention to retain our investment for a period that will be sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the market value of the investment. Since quoted market prices are usually not available, the fair value is typically based on the present value of expected future cash flows using discount rates believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants, plus market analysis of comparable assets owned by the investee, if appropriate. Differing assumptions could affect the timing and the amount of an impairment of an investment in any period. See the “APLNG” section of Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Asset Retirement Obligations and Environmental Costs

Under various contracts, permits and regulations, we have material legal obligations to remove tangible equipment and restore the land or seabed at the end of operations at operational sites. Our largest asset removal obligations involve plugging and abandonment of wells, removal and disposal of offshore oil and gas platforms around the world, as well as oil and gas production facilities and pipelines in Alaska. The fair values of obligations for dismantling and removing these facilities are recorded as a liability and an increase to PP&E at the time of installation of the asset based on estimated discounted costs. Estimating future asset removal costs is difficult. Most of these removal obligations are many years, or decades, in the future and the contracts and regulations often have vague descriptions of what removal practices and criteria must be met when the removal event actually occurs. Asset removal technologies and costs, regulatory and other compliance considerations, expenditure timing, and other inputs into valuation of the obligation, including discount and inflation rates, are also subject to change.

Normally, changes in asset removal obligations are reflected in the income statement as increases or decreases to DD&A over the remaining life of the assets. However, for assets at or nearing the end of their operations, as well as previously sold assets for which we retained the asset removal obligation, an increase in the asset removal obligation can result in an immediate charge to earnings, because any increase in PP&E due to the increased obligation would immediately be subject to impairment, due to the low fair value of these properties.

In addition to asset removal obligations, under the above or similar contracts, permits and regulations, we have certain environmental-related projects. These are primarily related to remediation activities required by Canada and various states within the United States at exploration and production sites. Future environmental remediation costs are difficult to estimate because they are subject to change due to such factors as the uncertain magnitude of cleanup costs, the unknown time and extent of such remedial actions that may be required, and the determination of our liability in proportion to that of other responsible parties. See Note 10—9—Asset Retirement Obligations and Accrued Environmental Costs, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Projected Benefit Obligations

Determination of the projected benefit obligations for our defined benefit pension and postretirement plans are important to the recorded amounts for such obligations on the balance sheet and to the amount of benefit expense in the income statement. The actuarial determination of projected benefit obligations and company contribution requirements involves judgment about uncertain future events, including estimated retirement dates, salary levels at retirement, mortality rates,lump-sum election rates, rates of return on plan assets, future health care cost-trend rates, and rates of utilization of health care services by retirees. Due to the specialized nature of these calculations, we engage outside actuarial firms to assist in the determination of these projected

benefit obligations and company contribution requirements. For Employee Retirement Income SecurityAct-governed pension plans, the actuary exercises fiduciary care on behalf of plan participants in the determination of the judgmental assumptions used in determining required company contributions into the plans. Due to differing objectives and requirements between financial accounting rules and the pension plan funding regulations promulgated by governmental agencies, the actuarial methods and assumptions for the two

purposes differ in certain important respects. Ultimately, we will be required to fund all vested benefits under pension and postretirement benefit plans not funded by plan assets or investment returns, but the judgmental assumptions used in the actuarial calculations significantly affect periodic financial statements and funding patterns over time. Projected benefit obligations are particularly sensitive to the discount rate assumption. A 1 percent decrease in the discount rate assumption would increase projected benefit obligations by $1,100$1,200 million. Benefit expense is particularly sensitive to the discount rate and return on plan assets assumptions. A 1 percent decrease in the discount rate assumption would increase annual benefit expense by $90$110 million, while a 1 percent decrease in the return on plan assets assumption would increase annual benefit expense by $50$60 million. In determining the discount rate, we use yields on high-quality fixed income investments matched to the estimated benefit cash flows of our plans. We are also exposed to the possibility that lump sum retirement benefits taken from pension plans during the year could exceed the total of service and interest components of annual pension expense and trigger accelerated recognition of a portion of unrecognized net actuarial losses and gains. These benefit payments are based on decisions by plan participants and are therefore difficult to predict. In the event there is a significant reduction in the expected years of future service of present employees or elimination for a significant number of employees the accrual of defined benefits for some or all of their future services, we could recognize a curtailment gain or loss. See Note 18—17—Employee Benefit Plans, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information.

Contingencies

A number of claims and lawsuits are made against the company arising in the ordinary course of business. Management exercises judgment related to accounting and disclosure of these claims which includes losses, damages, and underpayments associated with environmental remediation, tax, contracts, and other legal disputes. As we learn new facts concerning contingencies, we reassess our position both with respect to amounts recognized and disclosed considering changes to the probability of additional losses and potential exposure. However, actual losses can and do vary from estimates for a variety of reasons including legal, arbitration, or other third partythird-party decisions; settlement discussions; evaluation of scope of damages; interpretation of regulatory or contractual terms; expected timing of future actions; and proportion of liability shared with other responsible parties. Estimated future costs related to contingencies are subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administrative and litigation processes. For additional information on contingent liabilities, see the “Contingencies” section within “Capital Resources and Liquidity.”

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical fact included or incorporated by reference in this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements contained in this report include our expected production growth and outlook on the business environment generally, our expected capital budget and capital expenditures, and discussions concerning future dividends. You can often identify our forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target” and similar expressions.

We based the forward-looking statements on our current expectations, estimates and projections about ourselves and the industries in which we operate in general. We caution you these statements are not guarantees of future performance as they involve assumptions that, while made in good faith, may prove to be incorrect, and involve risks and uncertainties we cannot predict. In addition, we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what we have expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements. Any differences could result from a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

Fluctuations in crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids prices, including a prolonged decline in these prices relative to historical or future expected levels.
The impact of recent, significant declines in prices for crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids, which may result in recognition of impairment costs on our long-lived assets, leaseholds and nonconsolidated equity investments.
Potential failures or delays in achieving expected reserve or production levels from existing and future oil and gas developments, including due to operating hazards, drilling risks and the inherent uncertainties in predicting reserves and reservoir performance.
Inability to maintainReductions in reserves replacement rates, consistent with prior periods, whether as a result of the recent, significant declines in commodity prices or otherwise.
Unsuccessful exploratory drilling activities or the inability to obtain access to exploratory acreage.
Unexpected changes in costs or technical requirements for constructing, modifying or operating exploration and production facilities.
Legislative and regulatory initiatives addressing environmental concerns, including initiatives addressing the impact of global climate change or further regulating hydraulic fracturing, methane emissions, flaring or water disposal.
Lack of, or disruptions in, adequate and reliable transportation for our crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids.
Inability to timely obtain or maintain permits, including those necessary for construction, drilling and/or development, construction of LNG terminals or regasification facilities;development; failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations; or inability to make capital expenditures required to maintain compliance with any necessary permits or applicable laws or regulations.
Failure to complete definitive agreements and feasibility studies for, and to timely complete construction of, announced and future exploration and production and LNG development.development in a timely manner (if at all) or on budget.
Potential disruption or interruption of our operations due to accidents, extraordinary weather events, civil unrest, political events, war, terrorism, cyber attacks, or infrastructureand information technology failures, constraints or disruptions.
Changes in international monetary conditions and exchange controls, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates.rate fluctuations.

Reduced demand for our products or the use of competing energy products, including alternative energy sources.

Substantial investment in and development of alternative energy sources, including as a result of existing or future environmental rules and regulations.
Liability for remedial actions, including removal and reclamation obligations, under environmental regulations.
Liability resulting from litigation.
General domestic and international economic and political developments, including armed hostilities; expropriation of assets; changes in governmental policies relating to crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids pricing, regulation or taxation; and other political, economic or diplomatic developments.
Volatility in the commodity futures markets.
Changes in tax and other laws, regulations (including alternative energy mandates), or royalty rules applicable to our business.business, including changes resulting from the implementation and interpretation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Competition in the oil and gas exploration and production industry.
Any limitations on our access to capital or increase in our cost of capital related to illiquidity or uncertainty in the domestic or international financial markets.
Our inability to execute, asset dispositions or delays in the completion, of any asset dispositions we elect to pursue.
Potential failure to obtain, or delays in obtaining, any necessary regulatory approvals for asset dispositions or that such approvals may require modification to the terms of the transactions or the operation of our remaining business.
Potential disruption of our operations as a result of asset dispositions, including the diversion of management time and attention.
Our inability to deploy the net proceeds from any asset dispositions we undertake in the manner and timeframe we currently anticipate, if at all.
Our inability to liquidate the common stock issued to us by Cenovus Energy as part of our sale of certain assets in western Canada at prices we deem acceptable, or at all.
Our inability to obtain economical financing for development, construction or modification of facilities and general corporate purposes.
The operation and financing of our joint ventures.
The ability of our customers and other contractual counterparties to satisfy their obligations to us.
Our inability to realize anticipated cost savings and expenditure reductions.
The factors generally described in Item 1A—Risk Factors in this report.our 2017 Annual Report on Form10-K and any additional risks described in our other filings with the SEC.

Item 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Financial Instrument Market Risk

We and certain of our subsidiaries hold and issue derivative contracts and financial instruments that expose our cash flows or earnings to changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates or interest rates. We may use financial and commodity-based derivative contracts to manage the risks produced by changes in the prices of natural gas, crude oil and related products; fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; or to capture market opportunities.

Our use of derivative instruments is governed by an “Authority Limitations” document approved by our Board of Directors that prohibits the use of highly leveraged derivatives or derivative instruments without sufficient liquidity. The Authority Limitations document also establishes the Value at Risk (VaR) limits for the company, and compliance with these limits is monitored daily. The Executive Vice President of Finance, Commercial, and Chief Financial Officer, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer, monitorsmonitor commodity price risk and risks resulting from foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The Commercial organization manages our commercial marketing, optimizes our commodity flows and positions, and monitors risks.

Commodity Price Risk

Our Commercial organization uses futures, forwards, swaps and options in various markets to accomplish the following objectives:

 

Meet customer needs. Consistent with our policy to generally remain exposed to market prices, we use swap contracts to convert fixed-price sales contracts, which are often requested by natural gas consumers, to floating market prices.
Enable us to use market knowledge to capture opportunities such as moving physical commodities to more profitable locations and storing commodities to capture seasonal or time premiums. We may use derivatives to optimize these activities.

We use a VaR model to estimate the loss in fair value that could potentially result on a single day from the effect of adverse changes in market conditions on the derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments we hold or issue, including commodity purchases and sales contracts recorded on the balance sheet at December 31, 2016,2017, as derivative instruments. Using Monte Carlo simulation, a 95 percent confidence level and aone-day holding period, the VaR for those instruments issued or held for trading purposes or held for purposes other than trading at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, was immaterial to our consolidated cash flows and net income attributable to ConocoPhillips.

Interest Rate Risk

The following table provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in U.S. interest rates. The debt portion of the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Weighted-average variable rates are based on effective rates at the reporting date. The carrying amount of our floating-rate debt approximates its fair value. The fair value of the fixed-rate financial instruments is estimated based on quoted market prices.

  Millions of Dollars Except as Indicated   Millions of Dollars Except as Indicated 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Debt     Debt 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expected Maturity Date

   

 
 

Fixed

Rate
Maturity

  

  
  

   
 
 
Average
Interest
Rate
  
  
  
  
 
 
Floating
Rate
Maturity
  
  
  
   
 
 
Average
Interest
Rate
  
  
  
   

Fixed

Rate

Maturity

 

 

 

   

Average

Interest

Rate

 

 

 

  

Floating

Rate

Maturity

 

 

 

   

Average

Interest

Rate

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Year-End 2017

       

2018

  $2,250    3.31 %  $250    1.75 % 

2019

   23    -   -    - 

2020

   -    -   -    - 

2021

   150    9.13   -    - 

2022

   1,014    2.45   500    2.32 

Remaining years

   14,207    6.00   283    1.70 

 

Total

  $17,644    $1,033   

 

Fair value

  $21,402    $1,033   

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Year-End 2016

              

2017

  $1,001     1.06 %  $-     - %   $1,001    1.06 %  $-    - % 

2018

   1,570     3.63    250     1.24     1,570    3.63  250    1.24 

2019

   2,250     5.75    1,450     2.31     2,250    5.75  1,450    2.31 

2020

   1,500     4.73    -     -     1,500    4.73   -    - 

2021

   2,150     4.08    -     -     2,150    4.08   -    - 

Remaining years

   15,221     5.77    783     1.43     15,221    5.77  783    1.43 

 

 

Total

  $23,692     $2,483      $23,692    $2,483   

 

 

Fair value

  $26,824     $2,483      $26,824    $2,483   

 

 

Year-End 2015

       

2016

  $1,250     5.63 %  $108     0.35 % 

2017

   1,024     1.03    -     -  

2018

   1,547     3.68   250     0.69  

2019

   2,250     5.75   695     0.35  

2020

   1,500     4.73    -     -  

Remaining years

   14,371     5.72   783     0.81  

 

Total

  $21,942     $1,836    

 

Fair value

  $22,949     $1,836    

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We have foreign currency exchange rate risk resulting from international operations. We do not comprehensively hedge the exposure to currency exchange rate changes although we may choose to selectively hedge certain foreign currency exchange rate exposures, such as firm commitments for capital projects or local currency tax payments, dividends and cash returns from net investments in foreign affiliates to be remitted within the coming year.year, and investments inavailable-for-sale securities.

At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, we held foreign currency exchange forwards hedging cross-border commercial activity and foreign currency exchange swaps and options for purposes of mitigating our cash-related exposures. Although these forwards, swaps and swapsoptions hedge exposures to fluctuations in exchange rates, we elected not to utilize hedge accounting. As a result, the change in the fair value of these foreign currency exchange derivatives is recorded directly in earnings.

At December 31, 2017, we had outstanding foreign currencyzero-cost collars buying the right to sell $1.25 billion Canadian dollars (CAD) at $0.707 CAD and selling the right to buy $1.25 billion CAD at $0.842 CAD against the U.S. dollar. Based on the assumed volatility in the fair value calculation, the net fair value of these foreign currency contracts as at December 31, 2017, was abefore-tax loss of $9 million. Based on an adverse hypothetical 10 percent change in the December 2017 exchange rate, this would result in an additionalbefore-tax loss of $74 million. The sensitivity analysis is based on changing one assumption while holding all other assumptions constant, which in practice may be unlikely to occur, as changes in some of the assumptions may be correlated.

At December 31, 2016, we had outstanding foreign currency exchange forward-swap contracts. Since the gain or loss on the swaps iswas offset by the gain or loss from remeasuring the related cash balances and since our aggregate position in the forwards was not material, there would behave been no material impact to our income from an adverse hypothetical 10 percent change in the December 31, 2016 or 2015, exchange rates.

The gross notional and fair market values of these positions at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, were as follows:

   In Millions    In Millions
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Derivatives

   Notional*   Fair Market Value**     Notional*    Fair Market Value** 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2016   2015    2017   2016   2017 2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sell U.S. dollar, buy British pound

   USD     -     200    $-   (3

Sell U.S. dollar, buy Canadian dollar

   USD     13     -     -    -     USD    -    13    -   - 

Sell U.S. dollar, buy Norwegian krone

   USD     -     147     -   (2

Buy U.S. dollar, sell Canadian dollar

   USD     -     20     -   2  

Buy U.S. dollar, sell British pound

   USD     25     -     -    -     USD    -    25    -   - 

Sell Canadian dollar, buy U.S. dollar

   CAD    1,250    -    (9  - 

Buy Canadian dollar, sell U.S. dollar

   CAD    25    -    1   - 

Buy British pound, sell Canadian dollar

   GBP     1,069     564     (168 44     GBP    -    1,069    -  (168

Buy British pound, sell Euro

   GBP     -     3     -   (1

Sell British pound, buy Norwegian krone

   GBP     51     -     1    -     GBP    -    51    -  1 

Sell British pound, buy Euro

   GBP    1    -    -   - 

 

 

  *Denominated in U.S. dollars (USD) and, British pound (GBP) and Canadian dollars (CAD).

**Denominated in U.S. dollars.

For additional information about our use of derivative instruments, see Note 14—13—Derivative and Financial Instruments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

CONOCOPHILLIPS

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

   Page 

Report of Management

   7876 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   7978 

Consolidated Income Statement for the years ended December  31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015

   8179 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015

   8280 

Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016

   8381 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December  31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015

   8482 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015

   8583 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

   8684 

Supplementary Information

  

Oil and Gas Operations

   143140 

Selected Quarterly Financial Data

   170167 

Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

   171168 

 

Report of Management

Management prepared, and is responsible for, the consolidated financial statements and the other information appearing in this annual report. The consolidated financial statements present fairly the company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In preparing its consolidated financial statements, the company includes amounts that are based on estimates and judgments management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The company’s financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors and ratified by stockholders. Management has made available to Ernst & Young LLP all of the company’s financial records and related data, as well as the minutes of stockholders’ and directors’ meetings.

Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. ConocoPhillips’ internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the company’s management and directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2017. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment, we believe the company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2017.

Ernst & Young LLP has issued an audit report on the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2017, and their report is included herein.

 

/s/ Ryan M. Lance   /s/ Don E. Wallette, Jr.
Ryan M. Lance   Don E. Wallette, Jr.

Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

   

Executive Vice President, Finance,

Commercial and Chief Financial Officer

February 21, 201720, 2018

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TheTo the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholdersof ConocoPhillips

ConocoPhillipsOpinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ConocoPhillips as of December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, and the related consolidated income statement, consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included2017, and the related notes, condensed consolidating financial information listed in the Index at Item 8, and financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). These financial statements, condensed consolidating financial information, and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements, condensed consolidating financial information, and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of ConocoPhillips at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016,2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related condensed consolidating financial information and financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), ConocoPhillips’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 21, 2017,20, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP                Basis for Opinion

Houston, TexasThese financial statements are the responsibility of ConocoPhillips’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on ConocoPhillips’ financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to ConocoPhillips in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

February 21, 2017We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP                

We have served as ConocoPhillips’ auditor since 1949.

Houston, Texas

February 20, 2018

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TheTo the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholdersof ConocoPhillips

ConocoPhillipsOpinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited ConocoPhillips’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, ConocoPhillips maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated income statement, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes, condensed consolidating financial information listed in the Index at Item 8, and financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a) of ConocoPhillips and our report dated February 20, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

ConocoPhillips’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included under the heading “Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” in the accompanying “Report of Management.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sConocoPhillips’ internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to ConocoPhillips in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, ConocoPhillips maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2016 consolidated financial statements of ConocoPhillips and our report dated February 21, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP                

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP                

Houston, Texas

February 21, 2017

February 20, 2018

 

Consolidated Income Statement  ConocoPhillips

Years Ended December 31

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
              2016               2015               2014               2017             2016             2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Revenues and Other Income

          

Sales and other operating revenues

  $23,693     29,564     52,524    $29,106  23,693  29,564 

Equity in earnings of affiliates

   52     655     2,529     772  52  655 

Gain on dispositions

   360     591     98     2,177  360  591 

Other income

   255     125     366     529  255  125 

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

   24,360     30,935     55,517     32,584  24,360  30,935 

 

 

Costs and Expenses

          

Purchased commodities

   9,994     12,426     22,099     12,475  9,994  12,426 

Production and operating expenses

   5,667     7,016     8,909     5,173  5,667  7,016 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   723     953     735     561  723  953 

Exploration expenses

   1,915     4,192     2,045     938  1,915  4,192 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   9,062     9,113     8,329     6,845  9,062  9,113 

Impairments

   139     2,245     856     6,601  139  2,245 

Taxes other than income taxes

   739     901     2,088     809  739  901 

Accretion on discounted liabilities

   425     483     484     362  425  483 

Interest and debt expense

   1,245     920     648     1,098  1,245  920 

Foreign currency transaction gains

   (19)     (75)     (66)  

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

   35  (19 (75

Other expense

   302   -   - 

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

   29,890     38,174     46,127     35,199  29,890  38,174 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

   (5,530)     (7,239)     9,390  

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (1,971)     (2,868)     3,583  

Loss before income taxes

   (2,615 (5,530 (7,239

Income tax benefit

   (1,822 (1,971 (2,868

 

 

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations

   (3,559)     (4,371)     5,807  

Income from discontinued operations*

   -     -     1,131  

 

Net income (loss)

   (3,559)     (4,371)     6,938  

Net loss

   (793 (3,559 (4,371

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (56)     (57)     (69)     (62 (56 (57

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(3,615)     (4,428)     6,869  

Net Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(855 (3,615 (4,428

 

 

Amounts Attributable to ConocoPhillips Common Shareholders:

      

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  $(3,615)     (4,428)     5,738  

Income from discontinued operations*

   -     -     1,131  

 

Net Income (Loss)

  $(3,615)     (4,428)     6,869  

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips Per Share of Common Stock (dollars)

      

Net Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips Per Share of Common Stock(dollars)

    

Basic

        $(0.70 (2.91 (3.58

Continuing operations

  $(2.91)     (3.58)     4.63  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     0.91  

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips Per Share of Common Stock

  $(2.91)     (3.58)     5.54  

 

Diluted

         (0.70 (2.91 (3.58

Continuing operations

  $(2.91)     (3.58)     4.60  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     0.91  

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips Per Share of Common Stock

  $(2.91)     (3.58)     5.51  

 

 

Dividends Paid Per Share of Common Stock (dollars)

  $1.00     2.94     2.84    $1.06  1.00  2.94 

 

 

Average Common Shares Outstanding (in thousands)

          

Basic

   1,245,440     1,241,919     1,237,325     1,221,038  1,245,440  1,241,919 

Diluted

   1,245,440     1,241,919     1,245,863     1,221,038  1,245,440  1,241,919 

 

 

*Net of provision for income taxes on discontinued operations of:

  $-     -     16  

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

  ConocoPhillips

Years Ended December 31

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  2016   2015   2014   2017 2016         2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

  $(3,559)     (4,371)             6,938  

Net Loss

  $(793 (3,559 (4,371

Other comprehensive income (loss)

          

Defined benefit plans

          

Prior service credit (cost) arising during the period

               23     301     (3)  

Reclassification adjustment for amortization of prior service credit included in net income

   (35)     (19)     (6)  

Prior service credit arising during the period

   2  23  301 

Reclassification adjustment for amortization of prior service credit included in net loss

   (38 (35 (19

 

 

Net change

   (12)     282     (9)     (36 (12 282 

 

 

Net actuarial gain (loss) arising during the period

   (481)     592     (840)                 19  (481 592 

Reclassification adjustment for amortization of net actuarial losses included in net income

   309     403     131  

Reclassification adjustment for amortization of net actuarial losses included in net loss

   247              309  403 

 

 

Net change

   (172)     995     (709)     266  (172 995 

Nonsponsored plans*

   2     1     -     (2 2  1 

Income taxes on defined benefit plans

   78     (460)     281     (81 78  (460

 

 

Defined benefit plans, net of tax

   (104)     818     (437)     147  (104 818 

 

 

Unrealized holding loss on securities

   (58  -   - 

 

Unrealized loss on securities, net of tax

   (58  -   - 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   153     (5,199)     (3,539)     586  153  (5,199

Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net income

   5     -     -  

Reclassification adjustment for gain included in net loss

   -  5   - 

Income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments

   -     36     72     -   -  36 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax

   158     (5,163)     (3,467)     586  158  (5,163

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax

   54     (4,345)     (3,904)     675  54  (4,345

 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

   (3,505)     (8,716)     3,034  

Comprehensive Loss

   (118 (3,505 (8,716

Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (56)     (57)     (69)     (62 (56 (57

 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(3,561)     (8,773)     2,965  

Comprehensive Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(180)  (3,561 (8,773

 

 

*Plans for which ConocoPhillips is not the primary obligor—primarily those administered by equity affiliates.

  

  

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

      

*Plans for which ConocoPhillips is not the primary obligor—primarily those administered by equity affiliates.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet  ConocoPhillips

 

At December 31  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016   2015    2017 2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets

     

Cash and cash equivalents

  $          3,610             2,368    $          6,325            3,610 

Short-term investments

   50    -     1,873  50 

Accounts and notes receivable (net of allowance of $5 million in 2016 and $7 million in 2015)

   3,249   4,314  

Accounts and notes receivable (net of allowance of $4 million in 2017 and $5 million in 2016)

   4,179  3,249 

Accounts and notes receivable—related parties

   165   200     141  165 

Investment in Cenovus Energy

   1,899   - 

Inventories

   1,018   1,124     1,060  1,018 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   517   783     1,035  517 

 

 

Total Current Assets

   8,609   8,789     16,512  8,609 

Investments and long-term receivables

   21,091   20,490     9,599  21,091 

Loans and advances—related parties

   581   696     461  581 

Net properties, plants and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion
and amortization of $73,075 million in 2016 and $70,413 million in 2015)

   58,331   66,446  

Net properties, plants and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion
and amortization of $64,748 million in 2017 and $73,075 million in 2016)

   45,683  58,331 

Other assets

   1,160   1,063     1,107  1,160 

 

 

Total Assets

  $89,772   97,484    $73,362  89,772 

 

 

Liabilities

      

Accounts payable

  $3,631   4,895    $4,009  3,631 

Accounts payable—related parties

   22   38     21  22 

Short-term debt

   1,089   1,427     2,575  1,089 

Accrued income and other taxes

   484   499     1,038  484 

Employee benefit obligations

   689   887     725  689 

Other accruals

   994   1,510     1,029  994 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

   6,909   9,256     9,397  6,909 

Long-term debt

   26,186   23,453     17,128  26,186 

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

   8,425   9,580     7,631  8,425 

Deferred income taxes

   8,949   10,999     5,282  8,949 

Employee benefit obligations

   2,552   2,286     1,854  2,552 

Other liabilities and deferred credits

   1,525   1,828     1,269  1,525 

 

 

Total Liabilities

   54,546   57,402     42,561  54,546 

 

 

Equity

      

Common stock (2,500,000,000 shares authorized at $.01 par value)

      

Issued (2016—1,782,079,107 shares; 2015—1,778,226,388 shares)

   

Issued (2017—1,785,419,175 shares; 2016—1,782,079,107 shares)

   

Par value

   18   18     18  18 

Capital in excess of par

   46,507   46,357     46,622  46,507 

Treasury stock (at cost: 2016—544,809,771 shares; 2015—542,230,673 shares)

   (36,906 (36,780

Treasury stock (at cost: 2017—608,312,034 shares; 2016—544,809,771 shares)

   (39,906 (36,906

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (6,193 (6,247   (5,518 (6,193

Retained earnings

   31,548   36,414     29,391  31,548 

 

 

Total Common Stockholders’ Equity

   34,974   39,762     30,607  34,974 

Noncontrolling interests

   252   320     194  252 

 

 

Total Equity

   35,226   40,082     30,801  35,226 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Equity

  $89,772   97,484    $73,362  89,772 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows  ConocoPhillips

 

Years Ended December 31  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  2016 2015 2014   2017 2016 2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

        

Net income (loss)

  $(3,559 (4,371 6,938  

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities

    

Net loss

  $(793 (3,559 (4,371

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities

    

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

           9,062           9,113           8,329             6,845          9,062          9,113 

Impairments

   139   2,245   856     6,601  139  2,245 

Dry hole costs and leasehold impairments

   1,184   3,065   1,166     566  1,184  3,065 

Accretion on discounted liabilities

   425   483   484     362  425  483 

Deferred taxes

   (2,221 (2,772 709     (3,681 (2,221 (2,772

Undistributed equity earnings

   299   101   77     (232 299  101 

Gain on dispositions

   (360 (591 (98   (2,177 (360 (591

Income from discontinued operations

   -    -   (1,131

Other

   (85 321   (233   (429 (85 321 

Working capital adjustments

        

Decrease in accounts and notes receivable

   820   1,810   1,227  

Decrease (increase) in accounts and notes receivable

   (886 820  1,810 

Decrease (increase) in inventories

   44   166   (193   (55 44  166 

Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets

   105   239   (190

Decrease in accounts payable

   (524 (1,647 (963

Decrease in taxes and other accruals

   (926 (590 (566

 

Net cash provided by continuing operating activities

   4,403   7,572   16,412  

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

   -    -   157  

Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets

   69  105  239 

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable

   265  (524 (1,647

Increase (decrease) in taxes and other accruals

   622  (926 (590

 

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

   4,403   7,572   16,569     7,077  4,403  7,572 

 

 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities        

Capital expenditures and investments

   (4,869 (10,050 (17,085   (4,591 (4,869 (10,050

Working capital changes associated with investing activities

   (331 (968 180     132  (331 (968

Proceeds from asset dispositions

   1,286   1,952   1,603     13,860  1,286  1,952 

Net sales (purchases) of short-term investments

   (51  -   253  

Net purchases of short-term investments

   (1,790 (51  - 

Collection of advances/loans—related parties

   108   105   603     115  108  105 

Other

   (2 306   (446   36  (2 306 

 

 

Net cash used in continuing investing activities

   (3,859 (8,655 (14,892

Net cash used in discontinued operations

   -    -   (73

 

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

   (3,859 (8,655 (14,965

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

   7,762  (3,859 (8,655

 

 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities        

Issuance of debt

   4,594   2,498   2,994     -  4,594  2,498 

Repayment of debt

   (2,251 (103 (2,014   (7,876 (2,251 (103

Issuance of company common stock

   (63 (82 35     (63 (63 (82

Repurchase of company common stock

   (126  -    -     (3,000 (126  - 

Dividends paid

   (1,253 (3,664 (3,525   (1,305 (1,253 (3,664

Other

   (137 (78 (64   (112 (137 (78

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

   764   (1,429 (2,574   (12,356 764  (1,429

 

 
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents   (66 (182 (214   232  (66 (182

 

 
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents   1,242   (2,694 (1,184   2,715  1,242  (2,694

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   2,368   5,062   6,246     3,610  2,368  5,062 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $3,610   2,368   5,062    $6,325  3,610  2,368 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity    ConocoPhillips

 

   Millions of Dollars     Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Attributable to ConocoPhillips         Attributable to ConocoPhillips  
  

 

 

       

 

 

   
   Common Stock             Common Stock     
  

 

 

           

 

 

     
  Par
Value
   Capital in
Excess of
Par
   Treasury
Stock
   Accum. Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
   Retained
Earnings
   Non-
Controlling
Interests
   Total   Par
Value
   Capital in
Excess of
Par
   Treasury
Stock
 Accum. Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Retained
Earnings
 Non-
Controlling
Interests
 Total 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

  $      18     45,690     (36,780)     2,002     41,160     402     52,492  

Net income

           6,869     69     6,938  

Other comprehensive loss

         (3,904)         (3,904)  

Dividends paid

           (3,525)       (3,525)  

Distributions to noncontrolling interests and other

             (109)     (109)  

Distributed under benefit plans

     381             381  

 

December 31, 2014

  $18     46,071     (36,780)     (1,902)     44,504     362     52,273    $      18    46,071    (36,780 (1,902 44,504  362  52,273 

Net income (loss)

           (4,428)     57     (4,371)          (4,428 57  (4,371

Other comprehensive loss

         (4,345)         (4,345)         (4,345   (4,345

Dividends paid

           (3,664)       (3,664)          (3,664  (3,664

Distributions to noncontrolling interests and other

             (100)     (100)           (100 (100

Distributed under benefit plans

     286             286       286       286 

Other

           2     1     3          2  1  3 

 

 

December 31, 2015

  $18     46,357     (36,780)     (6,247)     36,414     320     40,082    $18    46,357    (36,780 (6,247 36,414  320  40,082 

Net income (loss)

           (3,615)     56     (3,559)          (3,615 56  (3,559

Other comprehensive income

         54         54         54    54 

Dividends paid

           (1,253)       (1,253)          (1,253  (1,253

Repurchase of company common stock

       (126)           (126)         (126    (126

Distributions to noncontrolling interests and other

             (124)     (124)           (124 (124

Distributed under benefit plans

     150             150       150       150 

Other

           2       2          2   2 

 

 

December 31, 2016

  $18     46,507     (36,906)     (6,193)     31,548     252     35,226    $18    46,507    (36,906 (6,193 31,548  252  35,226 

Net income (loss)

         (855  62   (793

Other comprehensive income

        675     675 

Dividends paid

         (1,305   (1,305

Repurchase of company common stock

       (3,000     (3,000

Distributions to noncontrolling interests and other

          (120  (120

Distributed under benefit plans

     115        115 

Other

         3    3 

 

 

December 31, 2017

  $18    46,622    (39,906  (5,518  29,391   194   30,801 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  ConocoPhillips

Note 1—Accounting Policies

 

 Consolidation Principles and Investments—Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of majority-owned, controlled subsidiaries and variable interest entities where we are the primary beneficiary. The equity method is used to account for investments in affiliates in which we have the ability to exert significant influence over the affiliates’ operating and financial policies. When we do not have the ability to exert significant influence, the investment is either classified asavailable-for-sale if fair value is readily determinable, or the cost method is used if fair value is not readily determinable. Undivided interests in oil and gas joint ventures, pipelines, natural gas plants and terminals are consolidated on a proportionate basis. Other securities and investments are generally carried at cost.

We manage our operations through six operating segments, defined by geographic region: Alaska, Lower 48, Canada, Europe and North Africa, Asia Pacific and Middle East, and Other International. For additional information, see Note 24—23—Segment Disclosures and Related Information. Unless indicated otherwise, the information in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements relates to our continuing operations.

 

 Foreign Currency Translation—Adjustments resulting from the process of translating foreign functional currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in common stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in current earnings. Most of our foreign operations use their local currency as the functional currency.

 

 Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

 Revenue Recognition—Revenues associated with sales of crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), natural gas liquids and other items are recognized when title passes to the customer, which is when the risk of ownership passes to the purchaser and physical delivery of goods occurs, either immediately or within a fixed delivery schedule that is reasonable and customary in the industry.

Revenues associated with producing properties in which we have an interest with other producers are recognized based on the actual volumes we sold during the period. Any differences between volumes sold and entitlement volumes, based on our net working interest, which are deemed to be nonrecoverable through remaining production, are recognized as accounts receivable or accounts payable, as appropriate. Cumulative differences between volumes sold and entitlement volumes are generally not significant.

Revenues associated with transactions commonly called buy/sell contracts, in which the purchase and sale of inventory with the same counterparty are entered into “in contemplation” of one another, are combined and reported net (i.e., on the same income statement line).

 

 Shipping and Handling Costs—We include shipping and handling costs in production and operating expenses for production activities. Transportation costs related to marketing activities are recorded in purchased commodities. Freight costs billed to customers are recorded as a component of revenue.

 

 Cash Equivalents—Cash equivalents are highly liquid, short-term investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of 90 days or less from their date of purchase. They are carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.

 

 Short-Term Investments—Investments in bank time deposits and marketable securities (commercial paper and government obligations) with original maturities of greater than 90 days but less than one year are classified as short-term investments.

 Inventories—We have several valuation methods for our various types of inventories and consistently use the following methods for each type of inventory. Commodity-relatedOur commodity-related inventories are valuedrecorded at the lower of cost or marketprimarily using thelast-in,first-out (LIFO) basis. We measure these inventories at thelower-of-cost-or-market in the aggregate, primarily on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis.aggregate. Any necessarylower-of-cost-or-market write-downs at year end are recorded as permanent adjustments to the LIFO cost basis. LIFO is used to better match current inventory costs with current revenues. Costs include both direct and indirect expenditures incurred in bringing an item or product to its existing condition and location, but not unusual/nonrecurring costs or research and development costs. Materials, supplies and other miscellaneous inventories, such as tubular goods and well equipment, are valued using various methods, including the weighted-average-cost method, and thefirst-in,first-out (FIFO) method, consistent with industry practice.

 

 Fair Value Measurements—Assets and liabilities measured at fair value and required to be categorized within the fair value hierarchy are categorized into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market-corroborated inputs. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability reflecting significant modifications to observable related market data or our assumptions about pricing by market participants.

 

 Derivative Instruments—Derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the right of offset exists and certain other criteria are met, derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty are netted on the balance sheet and the collateral payable or receivable is netted against derivative assets and derivative liabilities, respectively.

Recognition and classification of the gain or loss that results from recording and adjusting a derivative to fair value depends on the purpose for issuing or holding the derivative. Gains and losses from derivatives not accounted for as hedges are recognized immediately in earnings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, the gains or losses from adjusting the derivative to its fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings and, to the extent the hedge is effective, offset the concurrent recognition of changes in the fair value of the hedged item.

 

 Oil and Gas Exploration and Development—Oil and gas exploration and development costs are accounted for using the successful efforts method of accounting.

Property Acquisition Costs—Oil and gas leasehold acquisition costs are capitalized and included in the balance sheet caption properties, plants and equipment (PP&E). Leasehold impairment is recognized based on exploratory experience and management’s judgment. Upon achievement of all conditions necessary for reserves to be classified as proved, the associated leasehold costs are reclassified to proved properties.

Exploratory Costs—Geological and geophysical costs and the costs of carrying and retaining undeveloped properties are expensed as incurred. Exploratory well costs are capitalized, or “suspended,” on the balance sheet pending further evaluation of whether economically recoverable reserves have been found. If economically recoverable reserves are not found, exploratory well costs are expensed as dry holes. If exploratory wells encounter potentially economic quantities of oil and gas, the well costs remain capitalized on the balance sheet as long as sufficient progress assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project is being made. For complex exploratory discoveries, it is not unusual to have exploratory wells remain suspended on the balance sheet for several years while we perform additional appraisal drilling and seismic work on the potential oil and gas field or while we seek government orco-venturer approval of development plans or seek environmental permitting. Once all required approvals and permits have been obtained, the projects are moved into the development phase, and the oil and gas resources are designated as proved reserves.

Management reviews suspended well balances quarterly, continuously monitors the results of the additional appraisal drilling and seismic work, and expenses the suspended well costs as dry holes when it judges the potential field does not warrant further investment in the near term. See Note 8—7—Suspended Wells and Other Exploration Expenses, for additional information on suspended wells.

Development Costs—Costs incurred to drill and equip development wells, including unsuccessful development wells, are capitalized.

Depletion and Amortization—Leasehold costs of producing properties are depleted using theunit-of-production method based on estimated proved oil and gas reserves. Amortization of intangible development costs is based on theunit-of-production method using estimated proved developed oil and gas reserves.

 

 Capitalized Interest—Interest from external borrowings is capitalized on major projects with an expected construction period of one year or longer. Capitalized interest is added to the cost of the underlying asset and is amortized over the useful lives of the assets in the same manner as the underlying assets.

 

 Depreciation and Amortization—Depreciation and amortization of PP&E on producing hydrocarbon properties and certain pipeline assets (those which are expected to have a declining utilization pattern), are determined by theunit-of-production method. Depreciation and amortization of all other PP&E are determined by either the individual-unit-straight-line method or the group-straight-line method (for those individual units that are highly integrated with other units).

 

 Impairment of Properties, Plants and Equipment—PP&E used in operations are assessed for impairment whenever changes in facts and circumstances indicate a possible significant deterioration in the future cash flows expected to be generated by an asset group and annually in the fourth quarter following updates to corporate planning assumptions. If there is an indication the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered, the asset is monitored by management through an established process where changes to significant assumptions such as prices, volumes and future development plans are reviewed. If, upon review, the sum of the undiscountedbefore-tax cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset group, the carrying value is written down to estimated fair value through additional amortization or depreciation provisions and reported as impairments in the periods in which the determination of the impairment is made. Individual assets are grouped for impairment purposes at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets—generally on afield-by-field basis for exploration and production assets. Because there usually is a lack of quoted market prices for long-lived assets, the fair value of impaired assets is typically determined based on the present values of expected future cash flows using discount rates believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants or based on a multiple of operating cash flow validated with historical market transactions of similar assets where possible. Long-lived assets committed by management for disposal within one year are accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value, less cost to sell, with fair value determined using a binding negotiated price, if available, or present value of expected future cash flows as previously described.

The expected future cash flows used for impairment reviews and related fair value calculations are based on estimated future production volumes, prices and costs, considering all available evidence at the date of review. The impairment review includes cash flows from proved developed and undeveloped reserves, including any development expenditures necessary to achieve that production. Additionally, when probable and possible reserves exist, an appropriate risk-adjusted amount of these reserves may be included in the impairment calculation.

 Impairment of Investments in Nonconsolidated Entities—Investments in nonconsolidated entities are assessed for impairment whenever changes in the facts and circumstances indicate a loss in value has occurred and annually following updates to corporate planning assumptions. When such a condition is judgmentally determined to be other than temporary, the carrying value of the investment is written down to fair value. The fair value of the impaired investment is based on quoted market prices, if available, or upon the present value of expected future cash flows using discount rates believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants, plus market analysis of comparable assets owned by the investee, if appropriate.

Maintenance and Repairs—Costs of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant improvements, are expensed when incurred.

 

Property Dispositions—When complete units of depreciable property are sold, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated, with any gain or loss reflected in the “Gain on dispositions” line of our consolidated income statement. When less than complete units of depreciable property are disposed of or retired, the difference between asset cost and salvage value is charged or credited to accumulated depreciation.

 

Asset Retirement Obligations and Environmental CostsThe fairThefair value of legal obligations to retire and remove long-lived assets are recorded in the period in which the obligation is incurred (typically when the asset is installed at the production location). When the liability is initially recorded, we capitalize this cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related PP&E. If, in subsequent periods, our estimate of this liability changes, we will record an adjustment to both the liability and PP&E. Over time the liability is increased for the change in its present value, and the capitalized cost in PP&E is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. For additional information, see Note 10—9—Asset Retirement Obligations and Accrued Environmental Costs.

Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized, depending upon their future economic benefit. Expenditures relating to an existing condition caused by past operations, and those having no future economic benefit, are expensed. Liabilities for environmental expenditures are recorded on an undiscounted basis (unless acquired in a purchase business combination, which we record on a discounted basis) when environmental assessments or cleanups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is probable and estimable.

 

Guarantees—The fair value of a guarantee is determined and recorded as a liability at the time the guarantee is given. The initial liability is subsequently reduced as we are released from exposure under the guarantee. We amortize the guarantee liability over the relevant time period, if one exists, based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each type of guarantee. In cases where the guarantee term is indefinite, we reverse the liability when we have information indicating the liability is essentially relieved or amortize it over an appropriate time period as the fair value of our guarantee exposure declines over time. We amortize the guarantee liability to the related income statement line item based on the nature of the guarantee. When it becomes probable that we will have to perform on a guarantee, we accrue a separate liability if it is reasonably estimable, based on the facts and circumstances at that time. We reverse the fair value liability only when there is no further exposure under the guarantee.

 

Share-Based Compensation—We recognize share-based compensation expense over the shorter of the service period (i.e., the stated period of time required to earn the award) or the period beginning at the start of the service period and ending when an employee first becomes eligible for retirement. We have elected to recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the service period for the entire award, whether the award was granted with ratable or cliff vesting.

 

Income Taxes—Deferred income taxes are computed using the liability method and are provided on all temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities, except for deferred taxes on income and temporary differences related to the cumulative translation adjustment considered to be permanently reinvested in certain foreign subsidiaries and foreign corporate joint ventures.

Allowable tax credits are applied currently as reductions of the provision for income taxes. Interest related to unrecognized tax benefits is reflected in interest and debt expense, and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are reflected in production and operating expenses.

 

Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities—Sales and value-added taxes are recorded net.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock—Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock is calculated based upon the daily weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Also, this calculationthiscalculation includes fully vested stock and unit awards that have not yet been issued as common stock, along with an adjustment to net income (loss) for dividend equivalents paid on unvested unit awards that are considered participating securities. Diluted net income per share of common stock includes unvested stock, unit or option awards granted under our compensation plans and vested but unexercised stock options, but only to the extent these instruments dilute net income per share, primarily under the treasury-stock method. Diluted net loss per share, which is calculated the same as basic net loss per share, does not assume conversion or exercise of securities that would have an antidilutive effect. Treasury stock is excluded from the daily weighted-average number of common shares outstanding in both calculations. The earnings per share impact of the participating securities is immaterial.

Note 2—Change in Accounting Principles

We adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-02, “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis,” beginning January 1, 2016. The ASU amends existing requirements applicable to reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether certain legal entities, including variable interest entities (VIEs), should be consolidated. The adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures. See Note 4 —Variable Interest Entities, for additional information on our significant VIEs.

Note 3—Discontinued Operations

On December 20, 2012, we entered into agreements with affiliates of Oando PLC to sell our Nigeria business, which was previously part of the Other International operating segment. On July 30, 2014, we completed the sale for $1,359 million, inclusive of $550 million deposits previously received. The deposits had been included in the “Other accruals” line on our consolidated balance sheet and in the “Other” line of cash flows from investing activities on our consolidated statement of cash flows. The deposits received included $435 million in 2012, $15 million in 2013, and $100 million in 2014. We recognized a before-tax gain of $1,052 million, which is included in the “Income from discontinued operations” line on our consolidated income statement.

Sales and other operating revenues and income from discontinued operations related to the Nigeria business during 2014 were as follows:

   Millions of Dollars        
  

 

 

 
   2014  
  

 

 

 

Sales and other operating revenues from discontinued operations

  $480  

 

 

Income from discontinued operations before-tax

  $1,147  

Income tax expense

   16  

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

  $1,131  

 

 

Note 4—Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)

We hold variable interests in VIEs that have not been consolidated because we are not considered the primary beneficiary. Information on our significant VIEs follows:

Australia Pacific LNG Pty Ltd (APLNG)

APLNG is considered a VIE, as it has entered into certain contractual arrangements that provide it with additional forms of subordinated financial support. We are not the primary beneficiary of APLNG because we share with Origin Energy and China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec) the power to direct the key activities of APLNG that most significantly impact its economic performance, which involve activities related to the production and commercialization of coalbed methane, as well as LNG processing and export marketing. As a result, we do not consolidate APLNG, and it is accounted for as an equity method investment.

As of December 31, 2016,2017, we have not provided any financial support to APLNG other than amounts previously contractually required. Unless we elect otherwise, we have no requirement to provide liquidity or purchase the assets of APLNG. See Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, and Note 12—11—Guarantees, for additional information.

Marine Well Containment Company, LLC (MWCC)

MWCC provides well containment equipment and technology and related services in the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Its principal activities involve the development and maintenance of rapid-response hydrocarbon well containment systems that are deployable in the Gulf of Mexico on acall-out basis. We have a 10 percent ownership interest in MWCC, and it is accounted for as an equity method investment because MWCC is a limited liability company in which we are a Founding Member and exercise significant influence through our permanent seat on the ten memberten-member Executive Committee responsible for overseeing the affairs of MWCC. During the year ended December 31,In 2016, MWCC executed a $154 million term loan financing arrangement with an external financial institution whose terms required the financing be secured by letters of credit provided by certain owners of MWCC, including ConocoPhillips. In connection with the financing transaction, we issued a letter of credit of $22 million which can be drawn upon in the event of a default by MWCC on its obligation to repay the proceeds of the term loan. The fair value of this letter of credit is immaterial and not recognized on our consolidated balance sheet. MWCC is considered a VIE, as it has entered into arrangements that provide it with additional forms of subordinated financial support. We are not the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate MWCC because we share the power to govern the business and operation of the company and to undertake certain obligations that most significantly impact its economic performance with nine other unaffiliated owners of MWCC.

At December 31, 2016,2017, the book value of our equity method investment in MWCC was $148$139 million. We have not provided any financial support to MWCC other than amounts previously contractually required. Unless we elect otherwise, we have no requirement to provide liquidity or purchase the assets of MWCC.

Note 5—3—Inventories

Inventories at December 31 were:

 

   Millions of Dollars             Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2017    2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Crude oil and natural gas

  $418     406    $512    418 

Materials and supplies

   600     718     548    600 

   $      1,060            1,018 
  $1,018     1,124  

 

 

Inventories valued on the LIFO basis totaled $269$341 million and $317$269 million at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The estimated excess of current replacement cost over LIFO cost of inventories was approximately $104$124 million and $6$104 million at December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively. In 2016,2017, liquidation of LIFO inventory values increased the net loss from continuing operationsattributable to ConocoPhillips by $9$1 million.

Note 6—4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or SoldAcquired

Assets Held for Sale

In the second quarter of 2017, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our interest in the Barnett. We terminated this agreement in the fourth quarter of 2017 and are continuing to market the asset in 2018. In connection with the signing of the definitive agreement, we recorded abefore-tax impairment of $572 million to reduce the carrying value of our investment to estimated fair value. As of December 31, 2017, our Barnett interests had a net carrying value of approximately $291 million and were considered held for sale resulting in the reclassification of $339 million of PP&E to “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and $48 million of noncurrent liabilities, primarily asset retirement obligations (ARO), to “Other accruals” on our consolidated balance sheet. Thebefore-tax loss associated with our interests in the Barnett, including the $572 million impairment noted above, was $566 million, $66 million, and $58 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Barnett results of operations are reported within our Lower 48 segment.

In addition to the Barnett, certain other properties in our Lower 48 segment met the criteria for assets held for sale at December 31, 2017. These properties had a net carrying value of approximately $212 million after recording abefore-tax impairment of $78 million to reduce the carrying value to estimated fair value in the fourth quarter of 2017. We reclassified $238 million of PP&E to “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and $26 million of noncurrent liabilities, primarily AROs, to “Other accruals” on our consolidated balance sheet. In January 2018, we completed the sale of a portion of these properties for net proceeds of $112 million.

Assets Sold

All gains or losses are reportedbefore-tax and are included net in the “Gain on dispositions” line on our consolidated income statement. All cash proceeds are included in the “Cash Flows From Investing Activities” section of our consolidated statement of cash flows.

2017

On May 17, 2017, we completed the sale of our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the Foster Creek Christina Lake (FCCL) Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets to Cenovus Energy. Consideration for the transaction was $11.0 billion in cash after customary adjustments, 208 million Cenovus Energy common shares and a five-year uncapped contingent payment. The value of the shares at closing was $1.96 billion based on a price of $9.41 per share on the New York Stock Exchange. The contingent payment, calculated and paid on a quarterly basis, is $6 million Canadian dollars (CAD) for every $1 CAD by which the Western Canada Select (WCS) quarterly average crude price exceeds $52 CAD per barrel.

At closing, the carrying value of our equity investment in FCCL was $8.9 billion. The carrying value of our interest in the western Canada gas assets was $1.9 billion consisting primarily of $2.6 billion of PP&E, partly offset by AROs of $585 million and approximately $100 million of environmental and other accruals. Abefore-tax gain of $2.1 billion was included in the “Gain on disposition” line on our consolidated income statement in 2017. We reportedbefore-tax losses of $26 million, $572 million and $582 million for the western Canada gas producing properties for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We reportedbefore-tax equity earnings of $197 million, $89 million and $78 million for FCCL for the same periods, respectively. Both FCCL and the western Canada gas assets were reported within our Canada segment.

For more information on the Canada disposition and our investment in Cenovus Energy see Note 6—Investment in Cenovus Energy, Note 14—Fair Value Measurement, and Note 19—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.

On July 31, 2017, we completed the sale of our interests in the San Juan Basin to an affiliate of Hilcorp Energy Company for $2.5 billion in cash after customary adjustments, and recognized a loss on disposition of $22 million. The transaction includes a contingent payment of up to $300 million. Thesix-year contingent payment, effective beginning January 1, 2018, is due annually for the periods in which the monthly U.S. Henry Hub price is at or above $3.20 per million British thermal units.

In the second quarter of 2017, we recorded abefore-tax impairment of $3.3 billion to reduce the carrying value of our interests in the San Juan Basin to fair value. At the time of disposition, the San Juan Basin interests had a net carrying value of approximately $2.5 billion, consisting of $2.9 billion of PP&E and $406 million of liabilities, primarily AROs. Thebefore-tax loss associated with our interests in the San Juan Basin, including both the $3.3 billion impairment and $22 million loss on disposition noted above, was $3.2 billion, $239 million and $99 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The San Juan Basin results of operations were reported within our Lower 48 segment.

On September 29, 2017, we completed the sale of our interest in the Panhandle assets for $178 million in cash after customary adjustments, and recognized abefore-tax loss on disposition of $28 million. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our interest was $206 million, consisting primarily of $279 million of PP&E and $72 million of AROs. Including the $28 million loss on disposition noted above, we reportedbefore-tax losses for the Panhandle properties of $14 million, $21 million, and $41 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Panhandle results were reported within our Lower 48 segment.

2016

OnIn April 22, 2016, we sold our interest in the Alaska Beluga River Unit natural gas field in the Cook Inlet for $134 million, net of settlement of gas imbalances and customary adjustments, and recognized a gain on disposition of $56 million. At the time of disposition, the net carrying value of our Beluga River Unit interest, which was included in the Alaska segment, was $78 million, consisting primarily of $100 million of PP&E and $19 million of asset retirement obligations (ARO).AROs.

OnIn October 13, 2016, we completed an asset exchange with Bonavista Energy in which we gave up approximately 141,000 net acres of non-corenoncore developed properties in central Alberta in exchange for approximately 40,000 net acres of primarily undeveloped properties in northeast British Columbia. The fair value of the transaction was determined to be approximately $69 million and abefore-tax impairment of $57 million was recognized in the third quarter of 2016 when the assets were considered held for sale, to reduce the carrying value to fair value. In the fourth quarter, aA loss on disposition of approximately$1 $1 million was recognized upon completion of the transaction. The divested properties were included in the Canada segment.

OnAlso in October 28, 2016, we sold ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V., the entity that held our 35 percent interest in three exploration blocks offshore Senegal for $442 million and recognized a gain on disposition of $146 million. At the time of disposition, the carrying value of our interest was $286 million, which was primarily PP&E. Senegal results of operations were reported within our Other International segment.

On

In November 17, 2016, we completed the sale of our 40 percent interest in South Natuna Sea Block B for $225 million and recognized a loss on disposition of $26 million. Our interest in Block B was included in the Asia Pacific and Middle East segment. Previously, in the third quarter ofIn 2016, we recognized abefore-tax impairment of $42 million at the time it was considered held for sale to reduce the carrying value to fair value. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our interest was approximately $251 million, which included primarily $154 million of PP&E, $178 million of accounts receivable, $25 million of inventory, $54 million of deferred tax assets, $130 million of accounts payable and other accruals, and $38 million of employee benefit obligations.

OnIn December 8, 2016, we completed the sale of certain mineral andnon-mineral fee lands in northeastern Minnesota, which waswere included in the Lower 48 segment, for $148 million and recorded a gain on disposition of $4 million. The majority of the assets sold were acquired during the fourth quarter of 2016 as a result of ConocoPhillips holding a reversionary interest in the Greater Northern Iron Ore Properties Trust (the Trust), a grantor trust that owned mineral and surface interests in the Mesabi Iron Range in northeastern Minnesota and certain other personal property. Pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreement, the Trust terminated on April 6, 2015 and in2015. In November 2016, upon completion of the wind-down period, documents memorializing ConocoPhillips’ ownership of certain Trust property, including all of the Trust’s mineral properties and active leases, were delivered to us and we recognized the fair value of the net assets resulting in a gain of $88 million recorded in the “Other income” line on our consolidated income statement. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our interests, which included the assets obtained from the Trust, consisted of $144 million of PP&E.

2015

In November 2015, we sold a portion of our western Canadian properties located in British Columbia, Alberta, and Saskatchewan for $198 million and recognized a gain on disposition of $66 million. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our interest, which was included in the Canada segment, was $132 million, which included primarily $379 million of PP&E and $248 million of ARO.

In December 2015, we sold a portion of our western Canadian properties located in central Alberta for $130 million and recognized a loss on disposition of $235 million. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our interest, which was included in the Canada segment, was approximately $365 million, which included primarily $488 million of PP&E and $126 million of ARO.

Additionally, other December 2015 disposition transactions are summarized below.

We sold producing properties in East Texas and North Louisiana for $412 million and recognized a gain on disposition of $189 million. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our interest, which was included in the Lower 48 segment, was $223 million, which included $351 million of PP&E and $128 million of ARO.

We sold certain gas producing properties in South Texas for $358 million and recognized a gain on disposition of $201 million. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our interest, which was included in the Lower 48 segment, was $157 million, which included $369 million of PP&E and $212 million of ARO.

We sold certain pipeline and gathering assets in South Texas for $201 million and recognized a gain on disposition of $193 million. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our interest, which was included in the Lower 48 segment, was $8 million, which primarily included $24 million of PP&E and $18 million of ARO.

We also sold our 50 percent interest in the Russian joint venture, Polar Lights Company, for $98 million and recognized a gain on disposition of $58 million. At the time of the disposition, the carrying value of our equity method investment in Polar Lights Company, which was included in our Other International segment, was approximately $40 million.

2014

For information on the sale of our Nigeria business, which

Acquisition

In January 2018, we entered into an agreement to acquire certain oil and gas assets in Alaska for $400 million, subject to customary adjustments. The acquisition is included in the “Income from discontinued operations” line on our consolidated income statement, see Note 3—Discontinued Operations.subject to regulatory approval.

Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables

Components of investments, loans and long-term receivables at December 31 were:

 

   Millions of Dollars        
  

 

 

 
   2016     2015  
  

 

 

 

Equity investments

  $20,364     19,850  

Loans and advances—related parties

   581     696  

Long-term receivables

   631     519  

Other investments

   96     121  

 

 
  $        21,672             21,186  

 

 

   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   2017    2016 
  

 

 

 

Equity investments

  $9,129    20,364 

Loans and advances—related parties

   461    581 

Long-term receivables

   375    631 

Other investments

   95    96 
  $        10,060            21,672 

 

 

Equity Investments

Affiliated companies in which we had a significant equity investment at December 31, 2016,2017, included:

 

APLNG—37.5 percent owned joint venture with Origin Energy (37.5 percent) and Sinopec (25 percent)—to develop coalbed methane production from the Bowen and Surat basins in Queensland, Australia, as well as process and export LNG.
FCCL Partnership—50 percent owned business venture with Cenovus Energy Inc.—produces bitumen in the Athabasca oil sands in northeastern Alberta and sells the bitumen blend.
Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited (3) (QG3)—30 percent owned joint venture with affiliates of Qatar Petroleum (68.5 percent) and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (1.5 percent)—produces and liquefies natural gas from Qatar’s North Field, as well as exports LNG.

Summarized 100 percent earnings information for equity method investments in affiliated companies, combined, was as follows:

 

   Millions of Dollars  
  

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2014  
  

 

 

 

Revenues

  $        10,149             11,003             19,243  

Income before income taxes

   660     1,866     6,746  

Net income

   799     1,801     6,630  

 

 
   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   2017   2016    2015 
  

 

 

 

Revenues

  $        11,554           10,149            11,003 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   (2,875  660    1,866 

Net income (loss)

   (1,431)   799    1,801 

Summarized 100 percent balance sheet information for equity method investments in affiliated companies, combined, was as follows:

 

   Millions of Dollars     Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2017    2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Current assets

  $3,578     2,504    $2,920    3,578 

Noncurrent assets

           60,243     58,431             42,693    60,243 

Current liabilities

   2,352     1,863     2,453    2,352 

Noncurrent liabilities

   23,764           24,820     25,522            23,764 

 

Our share of income taxes incurred directly by an equity company is reported in equity in earnings of affiliates, and as such is not included in income taxes in our consolidated financial statements.

At December 31, 2016,2017, retained earnings included $1,392$20 million related to the undistributed earnings of affiliated companies. Dividends received from affiliates were $605 million, $398 million and $876 million in 2017, 2016 and $2,648 million in 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

APLNG

APLNG is focused on coalbed methane production from the Bowen and Surat basins in Queensland, Australia, to supply the domestic gas market and on LNG processing and export sales. Our investment in APLNG gives us access to coalbed methane resources in Australia and enhances our LNG position. The majority of APLNG LNG is sold under two long-termlong- term sales and purchase agreements, supplemented with sales of additional LNG spot cargoes targeting the Asia Pacific markets. Origin Energy, an integrated Australian energy company, is the operator of APLNG’s production and pipeline system, while we operate the LNG facility.

APLNG executed project financing agreements for an $8.5 billion project finance facility in 2012. The $8.5 billion project finance facility is composed of financing agreements executed by APLNG with the Export-Import Bank of the United States for approximately $2.9 billion, the Export-Import Bank of China for approximately $2.7 billion, and a syndicate of Australian and international commercial banks for approximately $2.9 billion. At December 31, 2016, $8.5 billion had2017, all amounts have been drawn from the facility.

APLNG made its first principal and interest repayment in March 2017, and will continue to makebi-annual payments until March 2029. At December 31, 2017, a balance of $7.9 billion was outstanding on the facility. In connection with the execution of the project financing, we provided a completion guarantee for ourpro-rata share of the project finance facility until the project achieves financial completion. In October 2016, we reached financial completion for Train 1, which reduced our associated guarantee by 60 percent. In August 2017, we reached financial completion for Train 2, which removed the remaining guarantee. See Note 12—11—Guarantees, for additional information.

APLNG is considered a VIE, as it has entered into certain contractual arrangements that provide it with additional forms of subordinated financial support. See Note 4—2—Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) for additional information.

On July 1, 2016, APLNG changed its tax functional currency from Australian dollar to U.S. dollar and translated all APLNG assets and liabilities into U.S. dollar, utilizing the exchange rate as of that date. As a result of this change, we recorded a reduction to our investment in APLNG for the deferred tax effect of $174 million in the “Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates” line of our consolidated income statement.

During the fourth quarter of 2015, due to the outlook for crude oil and natural gas prices at that time, the estimated fair value of our investment in APLNG declined to an amount below book value. Accordingly, we recorded a noncash $1,502 million before- andafter-tax impairment, in our fourth-quarter 2015 results.

During the third quarterfirst and second quarters of 2016,2017, the outlook for crude oil prices weakened again,deteriorated, and as a result of significantly reduced price outlooks, the estimated fair value of our investment in APLNG declined to an amount below book value as of September 30, 2016.carrying value. Based on a review of the facts and circumstances surrounding this decline in fair value, we concluded in the second quarter of 2017 the impairment was not other than temporary under the guidance of FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 323, “Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures.Ventures,

During and the fourth quarterrecognition of 2016, primarily due to the impact of accretion on discounted cash flows from the passage of time and strengthening of the U.S. dollar, the estimated fair valuean impairment of our investment increasedto fair value was necessary. Accordingly, we recorded a noncash $2,384 million, before- and is above bookafter- tax impairment in our second-quarter 2017 results. Fair value as of December 31, 2016. The expected futurewas estimated based on an internal discounted cash flows used for the impairment review of our investment in APLNG are based onflow model using estimated future production, an outlook of future prices from a combination of exchanges (short-term) and pricing service companies (long-term), costs, a market outlook of foreign exchange rates provided by a third party, and a discount rate believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants. Unfavorable changes in any of these assumptions could result in a reduction in future cash flows and could indicateThe impairment was included in the future. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, the outlook for crude prices and the U.S. dollar exchange rate relative to the Australian dollar has weakened. If these outlooks remain unchanged, we expect the estimated fair value of“Impairments” line on our investment in APLNG to be below book value at March 31, 2017.consolidated income statement.

At December 31, 2016,2017, the bookcarrying value of our equity method investment in APLNG was $10,089$7,669 million. The historical cost basis of our 37.5 percent share of net assets on the books of APLNG under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles was $8,348$7,213 million, resulting in a basis difference of $1,741$456 million on our books. The basis difference, which is substantially all

associated with PP&E and subject to amortization, has been allocated on a relative fair value basis to individual exploration and production license areas owned by APLNG, some of which are not currently in production. Any future additional payments are expected to be allocated in a similar manner. Each exploration license area will periodically be reviewed for any indicators of potential impairment, which, if required, would result in acceleration of basis difference amortization. As the joint venture produces natural gas from each license, we amortize the basis difference allocated to that license using theunit-of-production method. Included in net income (loss)loss attributable to ConocoPhillips for 2017, 2016 and 2015 and 2014 wasafter-tax expense of $100 million, $92 million $21 million and $24$21 million, respectively, representing the amortization of this basis difference on currently producing licenses.

FCCL

FCCL Partnership, a Canadian upstream 50/50 general partnership with Cenovus Energy Inc., produces bitumen in the Athabasca oil sands in northeastern Alberta and sells the bitumen blend. We account for our investment in FCCL under the equity method of accounting, with the operating results of our investment in FCCL converted to reflect the use of the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas exploration and development activities.

At December 31, 2016, the book value of our investment in FCCL was $8,784 million, net of a $1,706 million reduction due to cumulative foreign currency translation effects. FCCL’s operating assets consist of the Foster Creek and Christina Lake steam-assisted gravity drainage bitumen projects, both located in the eastern flank of the Athabasca oil sands in northeastern Alberta. Cenovus is the operator and managing partner of FCCL.

We were obligated to contribute $7.5 billion, plus accruedOn May 17, 2017, we completed the sale of our 50 percent nonoperated interest to FCCL over a 10-year period that began in 2007. In December 2013, we repaid the remaining balance of the obligation, which totaled $2,810 million. In the first quarter of 2014, we received a $1.3 billion distribution from FCCL, which is included in the “Undistributed equity earnings” lineFCCL Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets to Cenovus Energy. Financial information presented within this footnote includes our historical interest up to the date of sale. For additional information on the Canada disposition and our consolidated statement of cash flows.investment in Cenovus Energy, see Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired and Note 6—Investment in Cenovus Energy.

QG3

QG3 is a joint venture that owns an integrated large-scale LNG project located in Qatar. We provided project financing, with a current outstanding balance of $696$581 million as described below under “Loans and Long-Term Receivables.” At December 31, 2016,2017, the book value of our equity method investment in QG3, excluding the project financing, was $869$886 million. We have terminal and pipeline use agreements with Golden Pass LNG Terminal and affiliated Golden Pass Pipeline near Sabine Pass, Texas, in which we have a 12.4 percent interest, intended to provide us with terminal and pipeline capacity for the receipt, storage and regasification of LNG purchased from QG3. However, currently the LNG from QG3 is being sold to markets outside of the United States.

Loans and Long-Term Receivables

As part of our normal ongoing business operations and consistent with industry practice, we enter into numerous agreements with other parties to pursue business opportunities. Included in such activity are loans and long-term receivables to certain affiliated andnon-affiliated companies. Loans are recorded when cash is transferred or seller financing is provided to the affiliated ornon-affiliated company pursuant to a loan agreement. The loan balance will increase as interest is earned on the outstanding loan balance and will decrease as interest and principal payments are received. Interest is earned at the loan agreement’s stated interest rate. Loans and long-term receivables are assessed for impairment when events indicate the loan balance may not be fully recovered.

Through November 2014, we had an agreement with Freeport LNG Development, L.P. (Freeport LNG) to participate in an LNG receiving terminal in Quintana, Texas. We had no ownership in Freeport LNG; however, we had a 50 percent interest in Freeport LNG GP, Inc. (Freeport GP), which serves as the general partner managing the venture. We had entered into a credit agreement with Freeport LNG, whereby we agreed to provide loan financing for the construction of the terminal. We also entered into a long-term agreement with Freeport LNG to use 0.9 billion cubic feet per day of regasification capacity, which would have expired in 2033. When the terminal became operational in June 2008, we began making payments under the terminal use agreement. Freeport LNG began making loan repayments in September 2008.

In July 2013, we reached an agreement with Freeport LNG to terminate our long-term agreement at the Freeport LNG Terminal, subject to Freeport LNG obtaining regulatory approval and project financing for an LNG liquefaction and export facility in Texas, in which we are not a participant. These conditions were satisfied in 2014, and we paid Freeport LNG a termination fee of $522 million. Freeport LNG repaid the outstanding $454 million ConocoPhillips loan used by Freeport LNG to partially fund the original construction of the terminal. The payment made to Freeport LNG to terminate our long-term agreement is included in the cash flows from operating activities section on our consolidated statement of cash flows, while the receipt of the funds from Freeport LNG to repay the outstanding loan is included in the cash flows from investing activities section in 2014. These transactions, plus miscellaneous items, including the disposal of our 50 percent interest in Freeport GP, resulted in a one-time net cash outflow of $63 million for us. In addition, we recognized an after-tax charge to earnings of $540 million in 2014, and our terminal regasification capacity was reduced to zero.

At December 31, 2016,2017, significant loans to affiliated companies include $696$581 million in project financing to QG3. We own a 30 percent interest in QG3, for which we use the equity method of accounting. The other participants in the project are affiliates of Qatar Petroleum and Mitsui. QG3 secured project financing of $4.0 billion in December 2005, consisting of $1.3 billion of loans from export credit agencies (ECA), $1.5 billion from commercial banks, and $1.2 billion from ConocoPhillips. The ConocoPhillips loan facilities have substantially the same terms as the ECA and commercial bank facilities. On December 15, 2011, QG3 achieved financial completion and all project loan facilities became nonrecourse to the project participants. Semi-annual repayments began in January 2011 and will extend through July 2022.

The long-term portion of these loans is included in the “Loans and advances—related parties” line on our consolidated balance sheet, while the short-term portion is in “Accounts and notes receivable—related parties.”

Note 8—6—Investment in Cenovus Energy

On May 17, 2017, we completed the sale of our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the FCCL Partnership, as well as the majority of our western Canada gas assets to Cenovus Energy. Consideration for the transaction included 208 million Cenovus Energy common shares, which approximated 16.9 percent of issued and outstanding Cenovus common shares at closing. See Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired, for additional information on the Canada disposition.

At closing, the fair value and cost basis of our investment in 208 million Cenovus Energy common shares was $1.96 billion based on a price of $9.41 per share on the New York Stock Exchange.

We have classified our investment as anavailable-for-sale equity security on our consolidated balance sheet and, as of December 31, 2017, our investment is carried at fair value of $1.90 billion, reflecting the closing price of Cenovus Energy shares on the New York Stock Exchange of $9.13 per share. The carrying value reflects abefore-tax andafter-tax unrealized loss of $58 million over our cost basis of $1.96 billion. The unrealized loss is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. See Note 14—Fair Value Measurement, for additional information. We intend to decrease our investment over time through market transactions, private agreements or otherwise.

Note 7—Suspended Wells and Other Exploration Expenses

The following table reflects the net changes in suspended exploratory well costs during 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014:2015:

 

   Millions of Dollars     Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2014     2017    2016    2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Beginning balance at January 1

  $1,260     1,299     994    $        1,063            1,260              1,299 

Additions pending the determination of proved reserves

   225     331     478     118    225    331 

Reclassifications to proved properties

   (27)     (28)     (9)     (66)    (27)    (28) 

Sales of suspended well investment

   (247)     -     (57)     -    (247)    - 

Charged to dry hole expense

   (148)     (342)     (107)     (262)    (148)    (342) 

 

Ending balance at December 31

  $        1,063             1,260               1,299    $853    1,063    1,260 

 

 

The following table provides an aging of suspended well balances at December 31:

 

  Millions of Dollars    Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2014     2017    2016    2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Exploratory well costs capitalized for a period of one year or less

  $132     235     466    $67    132    235 

Exploratory well costs capitalized for a period greater than one year

   931     1,025     833     786    931    1,025 

 

Ending balance

  $        1,063             1,260               1,299    $853    1,063    1,260 

 

 

Number of projects with exploratory well costs capitalized for a period greater than one year

   26     28     30                 23                26                  28 

 

The following table provides a further aging of those exploratory well costs that have been capitalized for more

than one year since the completion of drilling as of December 31, 2016:2017:

 

   Millions of Dollars     Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     Suspended Since       Suspended Since 
    

 

 

     

 

 

 
   Total     2013–2015     2010–2012     2002–2009     Total    2014–2016    2011–2013    2004–2010 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Greater Poseidon—Australia(2)

   177     157     15     5     177    63    102    12 

Shenandoah—Lower 48(1)

   161     118     -     43  

Greater Clair—UK(2)

   131     120     11     -     144    99    45    - 

Surmont 3 and beyond—Canada(1)

   107     55     29     23  

Surmont—Canada(1)

   117    34    59    24 

NPRA—Alaska(1)

   93     70     -     23     114    66    42    6 

Caldita/Barossa—Australia(1)

   77     -     -     77  

Barossa/Caldita—Australia(2)

   77    -    -    77 

Middle Magdalena Basin—Colombia(1)

   31     31     -     -     48    48    -    - 

Limbayong—Malaysia(1)

   23     23     -     -  

Alpine Satellite—Alaska(2)

   22     -     -     22  

Bohai—China(2)

   19     19     -     -     19    19    -    - 

Kamunsu East—Malaysia(2)

   19     19     -     -     19    -    19    - 

NC 98—Libya(2)

   15     11     -     4     15    11    -    4 

Sunrise—Australia(2)

   13     -     -     13     13    -    -    13 

Other of $10 million or less each(1)(2)

   43     25     3     15     43    20    6    17 

 

Total

  $        931     648     58     225    $        786    360    273    153 

 

 

(1)Additional appraisal wells planned.

(2)Appraisal drilling complete; costs being incurred to assess development.

In line with our July 2015 announcement of plans to reduce future deepwater exploration spending, we recognizedbefore-tax cancellation costs of $335 million and wrote off $48 million ofbefore-tax capitalized rig costs in relation to the termination of our Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract with Ensco in the Lower 48 segment in the third quarter of 2015. In July 2016, we entered into an agreement to terminate our final Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract. The drillship, used to drill our operated deepwater well inventory in the Gulf of Mexico through April 2016, was contracted on a shared, three-year term. Accordingly, we recordedbefore-tax rig cancellation charges and third partythird-party costs of $146 million in our Lower 48 segment in 2016. These charges are included in the “Exploration expenses” line on our consolidated income statement.

In February 2017, we reached a settlement agreement on our contract for the Athena drilling rig, initially secured for our four-well commitment program in Angola. As a result of the cancellation, we will recognizerecognized abefore-tax charge of $43 million net in the first quarter of 2017. These charges are included in the “Exploration expenses” line on our consolidated income statement.

Note 9—8—Impairments

During 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014,2015, we recognized the followingbefore-tax impairment charges:

 

           Millions of Dollars                     Millions of Dollars         
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016   2015   2014     2017    2016  2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Alaska

  $1   10   59    $180    1  10 

Lower 48

   149   (2 208     3,969    149  (2

Canada

   88   4   38     22    88  4 

Europe and North Africa

   (160 724   541     46    (160 724 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   44   1,508   7     2,384    44  1,508 

Corporate

   17   1   3     -    17  1 

   $6,601    139  2,245 
  $139   2,245   856  

 

 

2017

In Alaska, we recorded impairments of $180 million primarily for the associated PP&E carrying value of our small interest in the Point Thomson unit.

In the Lower 48, we recorded impairments of $3,969 million primarily due to certain developed properties which were written down to fair value less costs to sell. See Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired, for additional information on our dispositions.

In Canada, we recorded impairments of $22 million primarily due to cancelled projects.

In Europe and North Africa, we recorded impairments of $46 million primarily due to reduced volume forecasts for a field in the United Kingdom and restructured ownership and a change in commercial premises for a gas processing plant in Norway, partly offset by decreased ARO estimates on fields at or nearing the end of life which were impaired in prior years.

In Asia Pacific and Middle East, we recorded impairments of $2,384 million, including the impairment of our APLNG investment. For more information, see the “APLNG” section of Note 5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables.

The charges discussed below, within this section, are included in the “Exploration expenses” line on our consolidated income statement and are not reflected in the table above.

In our Lower 48 segment, we recorded abefore-tax impairment of $51 million for the associated carrying value of capitalized undeveloped leasehold costs of Shenandoah in deepwater Gulf of Mexico following the suspension of appraisal activity by the operator. Additionally, we recorded a $38 millionbefore-tax impairment for mineral assets primarily due to plan of development changes.

2016

In the Lower 48, we recorded impairments of $149 million primarily due to cancelled projects associated with plan of development changes for Eagle Ford infrastructure, as well as lower natural gas prices and increased asset retirement obligationARO estimates.

In Canada, we recorded impairments of $88 million mainly due to plan of development changes, as well as certain developed properties which were classified as held for sale, being written down to fair value less costs to sell.

In Europe and North Africa, we recorded a credit to impairment of $160 million, primarily in the United Kingdom, due to decreased asset retirement obligationARO estimates on fields that areat or nearing the end of life andwhich were impaired in prior years, partly offset by asset impairments due to lower natural gas prices in the United Kingdom.

In Asia Pacific and Middle East, we recorded impairments of $44 million, mainly due to thea write-down to fair value less costs to sell of our developed properties in Block B, offshore Indonesia, in the third quarter of 2016.

In Corporate, we recorded impairments of $17 million due to cancelled projects in our Houston and Bartlesville offices.

The charges discussed below, within this section, are included in the “Exploration expenses” line on our consolidated income statement and are not reflected in the table above.

Charges recorded in exploration expenses in 2016 were related to our decision announced in 2015 to reduce deepwater exploration spending.

In our Lower 48 segment, we recorded a $203 millionbefore-tax impairment for the associated carrying value of our Gibson and Tiber undeveloped leaseholds in deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Additionally, we recorded a $95 millionbefore-tax impairment for the associated carrying value of capitalized undeveloped leasehold costs of the Melmar prospect and a $79 millionbefore-tax impairment, primarily as a result of changes in the estimated market value following the completion of marketing efforts.

In our Canada segment, we recordedbefore-tax unproved property impairments of $31 million, primarily due to decisions to discontinue furtheradditional testing of undeveloped leaseholds.

2015

See the “APLNG” section of Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for information on the impairment of our APLNG investment included within the Asia Pacific and Middle East segment.

In Europe and North Africa, we recorded impairments of $724 million, primarily in the United Kingdom as a result of lower natural gas prices and increases to asset retirement obligations.AROs.

The charges discussed below, within this section, are included in the “Exploration expenses” line on our consolidated income statement and are not reflected in the table above.

In our Other International segment, we decided not to pursue further evaluation of our Block 36 and Block 37 leases in Angola due to lack of commerciality of wells. Accordingly, we recordedbefore-tax impairments of $377 million and $116 million, respectively, for the associated carrying values of capitalized undeveloped leasehold costs.

In our Lower 48 segment, we decided not to conduct further activity on certain Gulf of Mexico leases, given our strategic plans to reduce deepwater exploration spending, and accordingly recordedbefore-tax impairments of $399 million for the associated carrying value of certain capitalized undeveloped leasehold costs.

In our Asia Pacific and Middle East segment, we decided to relinquish our Palangkaraya PSC in Indonesia. Accordingly, we recorded anabefore-tax impairment of $105 million for the associated carrying values of capitalized undeveloped leasehold cost.

In our Alaska segment, we recorded anabefore-tax impairment of $575 million for the associated carrying value of capitalized undeveloped leasehold cost in the Chukchi Sea in Alaska.

In our Canada segment, we recorded anabefore-tax impairment of $102 million for the Duvernay, Thornbury, Saleski and Crow Lake areas driven primarily by the lack of commerciality of wells.

2014

In Alaska, we recorded impairments of $59 million, primarily due to a cancelled project.

In our Lower 48 segment, we recorded impairments of $208 million, primarily as a result of reduced volume forecasts for an onshore field, as well as an LNG-related pipeline.

We recorded impairments of $38 million in our Canada segment, primarily due to reduced volume forecasts and lower natural gas prices.

In Europe, we recorded impairments of $541 million, mainly due to reduced volume forecasts, increases in the ARO and lower natural gas prices for properties in the United Kingdom which are nearing the end of their useful lives.

The charges discussed below, within this section, are included in the “Exploration expenses” line on our consolidated income statement and are not reflected in the table above.

In our Lower 48 segment, we recorded unproved property impairments of $239 million, primarily due to decisions to discontinue further testing of the undeveloped leaseholds.

Additionally, we decided not to pursue future development of the Amauligak discovery. Accordingly, we recorded a $145 million property impairment for the carrying value of capitalized undeveloped leasehold costs associated with our Amauligak, Arctic Islands and other Beaufort properties located offshore Canada.

Note 10—9—Asset Retirement Obligations and Accrued Environmental Costs

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs at December 31 were:

   Millions of Dollars      
  

 

 

 
   2016    2015  
  

 

 

 

Asset retirement obligations

  $8,405    9,911  

Accrued environmental costs

   247    258  

 

 

Total asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

   8,652    10,169  

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs due within one year*

   (227  (589

 

 

Long-term asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

  $8,425    9,580  

 

 

   Millions of Dollars     
  

 

 

 
   2017   2016 
  

 

 

 

Asset retirement obligations

  $7,798   8,405 

Accrued environmental costs

   180   247 

 

 

Total asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

   7,978   8,652 

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs due within one year*

   (347  (227

 

 

Long-term asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

  $7,631   8,425 

 

 

*Classified as a current liability on the balance sheet under “Other accruals.”

Asset Retirement Obligations

We record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligationARO when it is incurred (typically when the asset is installed at the production location). When the liability is initially recorded, we capitalize the associated asset retirement cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related PP&E. If, in subsequent periods, our estimate of this liability changes, we will record an adjustment to both the liability and PP&E. Over time, the liability increases for the change in its present value, while the capitalized cost depreciates over the useful life of the related asset.

We have numerous asset retirement obligationsAROs we are required to perform under law or contract once an asset is permanently taken out of service. Most of these obligations are not expected to be paid until several years, or decades, in the future and will be funded from general company resources at the time of removal. Our largest individual obligations involve plugging and abandonment of wells and removal and disposal of offshore oil and gas platforms around the world, as well as oil and gas production facilities and pipelines in Alaska.

During 20162017 and 2015,2016, our overall asset retirement obligationARO changed as follows:

 

   Millions of Dollars        
  

 

 

 
   2016    2015  
  

 

 

 

Balance at January 1

  $9,911    10,939  

Accretion of discount

   420    480  

New obligations

   180    135  

Changes in estimates of existing obligations

   (1,197  267  

Spending on existing obligations

   (314  (437

Property dispositions

   (150  (726

Foreign currency translation

   (464  (747

Other

   19    -  

 

 

Balance at December 31

  $8,405    9,911  

 

 

   Millions of Dollars       
  

 

 

 
   2017   2016 
  

 

 

 

Balance at January 1

  $8,405   9,911 

Accretion of discount

   358   420 

New obligations

   113   180 

Changes in estimates of existing obligations

   (150  (1,197

Spending on existing obligations

   (152  (314

Property dispositions

   (1,065  (150

Foreign currency translation

   289   (445

 

 

Balance at December 31

  $7,798   8,405 

 

 

Accrued Environmental Costs

Total accrued environmental costs at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, were $247$180 million and $258$247 million, respectively.

We had accrued environmental costs of $183$105 million and $184$183 million at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, related to remediation activities in the United States and Canada. We had also accrued in Corporate and Other $51$60 million and $57$51 million of environmental costs associated with sites no longer in operation at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. In addition, $13$15 million and $17$13 million were included at both December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, where the company has been named a potentially responsible party under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or similar state laws. Accrued environmental liabilities are expected to be paid over periods extending up to 30 years.

Expected expenditures for environmental obligations acquired in various business combinations are discounted using a weighted-average 5 percent discount factor, resulting in an accrued balance for acquired environmental liabilities of $92$96 million at December 31, 2016.2017. The expected future undiscounted payments related to the portion of the accrued environmental costs that have been discounted are: $9 million in 2017, $12 million in 2018, $8$10 million in 2019, $5 million in 2020, $4$10 million in 2021, $3 million in 2022, and $110$106 million for all future years after 2021.2022.

Note 11—10—Debt

Long-term debt at December 31 was:

   Millions of Dollars           Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016   2015     2017  2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

9.125% Debentures due 2021

  $150   150    $150  150 

8.20% Debentures due 2025

   150   150     150  150 

8.125% Notes due 2030

   600   600     600  600 

7.9% Debentures due 2047

   100   100     100  100 

7.8% Debentures due 2027

   300   300     300  300 

7.65% Debentures due 2023

   88   88     88  88 

7.40% Notes due 2031

   500   500     500  500 

7.375% Debentures due 2029

   92   92     92  92 

7.25% Notes due 2031

   500   500     500  500 

7.20% Notes due 2031

   575   575     575  575 

7% Debentures due 2029

   200   200     200  200 

6.95% Notes due 2029

   1,549   1,549     1,549  1,549 

6.875% Debentures due 2026

   67   67     67  67 

6.65% Debentures due 2018

   297   297     -  297 

6.50% Notes due 2039

   2,750   2,750     2,750  2,750 

6.00% Notes due 2020

   1,000   1,000     -  1,000 

5.951% Notes due 2037

   645   645     645  645 

5.95% Notes due 2036

   500   500     500  500 

5.95% Notes due 2046

   500    -     500  500 

5.90% Notes due 2032

   505   505     505  505 

5.90% Notes due 2038

   600   600     600  600 

5.75% Notes due 2019

   2,250   2,250     -  2,250 

5.625% Notes due 2016

   -   1,250  

5.20% Notes due 2018

   500   500     -  500 

4.95% Notes due 2026

   1,250    -     1,250  1,250 

4.30% Notes due 2044

   750   750     750  750 

4.20% Notes due 2021

   1,250    -     1,000  1,250 

4.15% Notes due 2034

   500   500     500  500 

3.35% Notes due 2024

   1,000   1,000     1,000  1,000 

3.35% Notes due 2025

   500   500     500  500 

2.875% Notes due 2021

   750   750     750  750 

2.4% Notes due 2022

   1,000   1,000     1,000  1,000 

2.2% Notes due 2020

   500   500     500  500 

1.5% Notes due 2018

   750   750     -  750 

1.05% Notes due 2017

   1,000   1,000     -  1,000 

Floating rate term loan due 2019 at 1.94% – 2.31% during 2016

   1,450    -  

Floating rate notes due 2018 at 0.69% – 1.24% during 2016 and 0.61% – 0.69% during 2015

   250   250  

Floating rate notes due 2022 at 1.26% – 1.81% during 2016 and 1.18% – 1.26% during 2015

   500   500  

Commercial paper at 0.16% – 0.80% during 2015

   -   803  

Industrial Development Bonds due 2016 through 2038 at 0.01% – 0.91% during 2016 and 0.01% – 0.13% during 2015

   18   18  

Marine Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds due 2031 at 0.01% – 0.95% during 2016 and 0.01% – 0.14% during 2015

   265   265  

Floating rate term loan due 2019 at 2.31% – 2.75% during 2017 and 1.94% – 2.31% during 2016

   -  1,450 

Floating rate notes due 2018 at 1.24% – 1.75% during 2017 and 0.69% – 1.24% during 2016

   250  250 

Floating rate notes due 2022 at 1.81% – 2.32% during 2017 and 1.26% – 1.81% during 2016

   500  500 

Industrial Development Bonds due 2017 through 2038 at 0.64% – 1.74% during 2017 and 0.01% – 0.91% during 2016

   18  18 

Marine Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds due 2031 at 0.64% – 1.74% during 2017 and 0.01% – 0.95% during 2016

   265  265 

Other

   24   24     23  24 

 

 

Debt at face value

   26,175   23,778     18,677  26,175 

Capitalized leases

   852   818     774  852 

Net unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs

   248   284     252  248 

 

 

Total debt

   27,275   24,880     19,703  27,275 

Short-term debt

   (1,089 (1,427   (2,575 (1,089

 

 

Long-term debt

  $26,186   23,453    $17,128  26,186 

 

 

Maturities of long-term borrowings, inclusive of net unamortized premiums and discounts, in 20172018 through 20212022 are: $1,089$2,575 million, $1,894$113 million, $3,784$97 million, $1,593$236 million and $2,235$1,602 million, respectively.

In the first quarter of 2016, we reduced ourWe have a revolving credit facility totaling $6.75 billion, expiring in June 2019, from $7.0 billion to $6.75 billion.2019. Our revolving credit facility may be used for direct bank borrowings, for the issuance of letters of credit totaling up to $500 million, or as support for our commercial paper programs. The revolving credit facility is broadly syndicated among financial institutions and does not contain any material adverse change provisions or any covenants requiring maintenance of specified financial ratios or credit ratings. The facility agreement contains a cross-default provision relating to the failure to pay principal or interest on other debt obligations of $200 million or more by ConocoPhillips, or any of its consolidated subsidiaries.

Credit facility borrowings may bear interest at a margin above rates offered by certain designated banks in the London interbank market or at a margin above the overnight federal funds rate or prime rates offered by certain designated banks in the United States. The agreement calls for commitment fees on available, but unused, amounts. The agreement also contains early termination rights if our current directors or their approved successors cease to be a majority of the Board of Directors.

We have two commercial paper programs supported by our $6.75 billion revolving credit facility: theprograms. The ConocoPhillips $6.25 billion commercial paper program primarily a funding source foris available to fund short-term working capital needs, andneeds. We also have the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. $500 million commercial paper program, which is used to fund commitments relating to QG3. Commercial paper maturities are generally limited to 90 days.

At both We had no commercial paper outstanding at December 31, 2017 or 2016, and 2015, we had no direct outstanding borrowings under either the revolving credit facility, with no letters of credit as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. UnderConocoPhillips or the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. commercial paper program,program. We had no commercial paper was outstanding at December 31, 2016, compared with $803 million at December 31, 2015.direct borrowings or letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility. Since we had no commercial paper outstanding and had issued no letters of credit, we had access to $6.75 billion in borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility at December 31, 2016.2017.

In March 2016,2017, two notes totaling $1,001 million were paid at maturity, including the $1.0 billion 1.05% Notes due 2017. Also in 2017, we issued notes consisting of:prepaid the $1,450 million term loan facility due in 2019.

We also redeemed a total $5.0 billion of debt, described below, incurring $301 million in premiums above book value, which are reported in the “Other expense” line on our consolidated income statement.

 

The $1,250 million6.65% Debentures due 2018 with principal of $297 million.
5.20% Notes due 2018 with principal of $500 million.
1.5% Notes due 2018 with principal of $750 million.
5.75% Notes due 2019 with principal of $2.25 billion.
6.00% Notes due 2020 with principal of $1.0 billion.
4.20% Notes due 2021.
The $1,250 million2021 with principal of 4.95%$1.25 billion (partial redemption of $250 million).

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we gave notice to redeem the following debt instruments totaling $2.25 billion.

2.2% Notes due 2026.2020 with principal of $500 million.
The $500 million of 5.95%4.20% Notes due 2046.

In addition, on March 18, 2016, we entered into a $1,600 million three-year senior unsecured term loan facility. In December 2016, an early repayment2021 with remaining principal of $150 million reduced the loan to $1,450 million. We have the right at any time and from time to time to prepay the term loan, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty upon notice to the Administrative Agent. Borrowings will accrue interest at a base rate or, for certain Eurodollar borrowings, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), in each case plus a margin that is set based on our corporate credit ratings. The applicable margin for loans bearing interest based on the base rate ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% and the applicable margin for loans bearing interest based on LIBOR ranges from 1.50% to 2.00%. Based on our current corporate credit ratings, the applicable margin for loans accruing interest at the base rate is 0.50% and the applicable margin for loans accruing interest at LIBOR is 1.50%.

The term loan facility contains customary covenants regarding, among other matters, material compliance with laws and restrictions against certain consolidations, mergers and asset sales and creation of certain liens on our assets and consolidated subsidiaries. The term loan facility also contains financial covenants including a total debt to capitalization ratio, excluding the impacts of certain noncash impairments and foreign currency translation adjustments as defined in the Term Loan Agreement, which may not exceed 65 percent. At December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with this covenant.

The term loan facility includes customary events of default (subject to specified cure periods, materiality qualifiers and exceptions), including the failure to pay any interest, principal or fees when due, the failure to perform or the violation of any covenant contained in the term loan facility, the making of materially inaccurate or false representations or warranties, a default on certain material indebtedness, insolvency or bankruptcy, a change of control and the occurrence of material Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) events and certain judgments against us or our material subsidiaries.

The net proceeds of the notes and term loan will be used for general corporate purposes.

On October 17, 2016, the $1,250 million 5.625%$1.0 billion.

2.875% Notes due 2016 were repaid at maturity.2021 with principal of $750 million.

The prepayments occurred on January 22, 2018, and we incurred premiums above book value of $75 million.

At both December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, we had $283 million of certain variable rate demand bonds (VRDBs) outstanding with maturities ranging through 2035. The VRDBs are redeemable at the option of the bondholders on any business day. The VRDBs are included in the “Long-term debt” line on our consolidated balance sheet.

During 2013, a lease of a semi-submersible floating production system (FPS) commenced for the Gumusut development, located in Malaysia, in which we are aco-venturer. The FPS lease provides for an initial

noncancelable term of 15 years, a subsequent5-year cancelable term with no required lease payments, and an additional5-year term with terms and conditions to be agreed at a later date. The lease has no ongoing purchase options or escalation clauses. Adjustments to provisional contingent rental payments may occur due to the finalization of actual commissioning costs. The lease does not impose any significant restrictions concerning dividends, debt or further leasing activities.

A capital lease asset and capital lease obligation were recognized for our proportionate interest in the FPS of $906 million, based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments using ourbefore-tax incremental borrowing rate of 3.58 percent for debt with similar terms. Unitization of the Gumusut development with Brunei was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2015 and reduced ourOur proportionate interest in the FPS from 33is 29 percent to 29 percent.as of December 31, 2017. The net carrying value of the capital lease asset was approximately $540$434 million and $707$540 million as of December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively. The capital lease asset is being depreciated over a period consistent with the estimated proved reserves of Gumusut using theunit-of-production method with the associated depreciation included in the “Depreciation, depletion and amortization” line on our consolidated income statement. As of December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, accumulated depreciation of the capital lease asset amounted to approximately $268$381 million and $122$268 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2016,2017, future minimum payments due under capital leases were:

 

   
 
Millions
of Dollars
  
  
  

 

 

 

2017

  $121  

2018

   102  

2019

   102  

2020

   103  

2021

   88  

Remaining years

   590  

 

 

Total

   1,106  

Less: portion representing imputed interest

   (254

 

 

Capital lease obligations

  $852  

 

 

   

Millions

of Dollars

 

 

  

 

 

 

2018

  $108 

2019

   106 

2020

   106 

2021

   88 

2022

   88 

Remaining years

   487 

 

 

Total

   983 

Less: portion representing imputed interest

   (209

 

 

Capital lease obligations

  $774 

 

 

Note 12—11—Guarantees

At December 31, 2016,2017, we were liable for certain contingent obligations under various contractual arrangements as described below. We recognize a liability, at inception, for the fair value of our obligation as a guarantor for newly issued or modified guarantees. Unless the carrying amount of the liability is noted below, we have not recognized a liability because the fair value of the obligation is immaterial. In addition, unless otherwise stated, we are not currently performing with any significance under the guarantee and expect future performance to be either immaterial or have only a remote chance of occurrence.

APLNG Guarantees

At December 31, 2016,2017, we had outstanding multiple guarantees in connection with our 37.5 percent ownership interest in APLNG. The following is a description of the guarantees with values calculated utilizing December 20162017 exchange rates:

 

We have guaranteed APLNG’s performance with regard to a construction contract executed in connection with APLNG’s issuance of the Train 1 and Train 2 Notices to Proceed. We estimate the remaining term of this guarantee is one year. Our maximum potential amount of future payments related to this guarantee is approximately $10 million and would become payable if APLNG cancelsbecame immaterial in the applicable construction contract and does not perform with respect to the amounts owed to the contractor.second quarter of 2017.

 

We have issued a construction completion guarantee related to the third-party project financing secured by APLNG. Our guarantee of the project financing will be released upon meeting certain completion tests with milestones which we estimate should occur in 2017. In October 2016, we reached financial completion for Train 1, releasing a portion of our guarantee. Our maximum exposure at December 31, 2016, is $1.3 billion based upon our pro-rata share ofIn August 2017, the facility used at that date, which could be payable if completion oftwo-train project finance lenders’ test was completed, releasing the project is not achieved. At December 31, 2016, the carrying value of this guarantee is approximately $46 million.remaining guarantee.

During the third quarter of 2016, we issued a guarantee forto facilitate the withdrawal of ourpro-rata portion of the funds in a project finance reserve account. We estimate the remaining term of this guarantee is 1312 years. Our maximum exposure under this guarantee is approximately $60$200 million and may become payable if an enforcement action is commenced by the project finance lenders against APLNG. At December 31, 2016,2017, the carrying value of this guarantee is approximately $9$14 million.

 

In conjunction with our original purchase of an ownership interest in APLNG from Origin Energy in October 2008, we agreed to reimburse Origin Energy for our share of the existing contingent liability arising under guarantees of an existing obligation of APLNG to deliver natural gas under several sales agreements with remaining terms of 1up to 2524 years. Our maximum potential liability for future payments, or cost of volume delivery, under these guarantees is estimated to be $1.0 billion$960 million ($1.71.71 billion in the event of intentional or reckless breach) and would become payable if APLNG fails to meet its obligations under these agreements and the obligations cannot otherwise be mitigated. Future payments are considered unlikely, as the payments, or cost of volume delivery, would only be triggered if APLNG does not have enough natural gas to meet these sales commitments and if theco-venturers do not make necessary equity contributions into APLNG.

 

We have guaranteed the performance of APLNG with regard to certain other contracts executed in connection with the project’s continued development. The guarantees have remaining terms of up to 2928 years or the life of the venture. Our maximum potential amount of future payments related to these guarantees is approximately $160$150 million and would become payable if APLNG does not perform.

Other Guarantees

We have other guarantees with maximum future potential payment amounts totaling approximately $540$780 million, which consist primarily of a guaranteeguarantees of the residual value of a leased office building,buildings, guarantees of the residual value of leased corporate aircraft, and a guarantee for our portion of a joint venture’s project finance reserve accounts.

These guarantees have remaining terms of up to six5 years and would become payable if, upon sale, certain asset values are lower than guaranteed amounts, business conditions decline at guaranteed entities, or as a result of nonperformance of contractual terms by guaranteed parties.

Indemnifications

Over the years, we have entered into agreements to sell ownership interests in certain corporations, joint ventures and assets that gave rise to qualifying indemnifications. These agreements include indemnifications for taxes, environmental liabilities, employee claims and litigation. The terms of these indemnifications vary greatly. The majority of these indemnifications are related to environmental issues, the term is generally indefinite and the maximum amount of future payments is generally unlimited. The carrying amount recorded for these indemnifications at December 31, 2016,2017, was approximately $100 million. We amortize the indemnification liability over the relevant time period, if one exists, based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each type of indemnity. In cases where the indemnification term is indefinite, we will reverse the liability when we have information the liability is essentially relieved or amortize the liability over an appropriate time period as the fair value of our indemnification exposure declines. Although it is reasonably possible future payments may exceed amounts recorded, due to the nature of the indemnifications, it is not possible to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments. Included in the recorded carrying amount at December 31, 2016,2017, were approximately $40 million of environmental accruals for known contamination that are included in the “Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs” line on our consolidated balance sheet. For additional information about environmental liabilities, see Note 13—12—Contingencies and Commitments.

On April 30,In 2012, we completed the separation of our downstream business, was completed, creating two independent energy companies: ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66. In connection with the separation, we entered into an Indemnification and Release Agreement, which provides for cross-indemnities between Phillips 66 and us and established procedures for handling claims subject to indemnification and related matters. We evaluated the impact of the indemnifications given and the Phillips 66 indemnifications received as of the separation date and concluded those fair values were immaterial.

On March 1, 2015, a supplier to one of the refineries included in Phillips 66 as part of the separation of our downstream business formally registered Phillips 66 as a party to the supply agreement, thereby triggering a guarantee we provided at the time of separation. Our maximum potential liability for future payments under this guarantee, which would become payable if Phillips 66 does not perform its contractual obligations under the supply agreement, is approximately $1.4$1.31 billion. At

December 31, 2016,2017, the carrying value of this guarantee is approximately $98 million and the remaining term is eightseven years. Because Phillips 66 has indemnified us for losses incurred under this guarantee, we have recorded an indemnification asset from Phillips 66 of approximately $98 million. The recorded indemnification asset amount represents the estimated fair value of the guarantee; however, if we are required to perform under the guarantee, we would expect to recover from Phillips 66 any amounts in excess of that value, provided Phillips 66 is a going concern.

Note 13—12—Contingencies and Commitments

A number of lawsuits involving a variety of claims arising in the ordinary course of business have been filed against ConocoPhillips. We also may be required to remove or mitigate the effects on the environment of the placement, storage, disposal or release of certain chemical, mineral and petroleum substances at various active and inactive sites. We regularly assess the need for accounting recognition or disclosure of these contingencies. In the case of all known contingencies (other than those related to income taxes), we accrue a liability when the loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not reduce these liabilities for potential insurance or third-party recoveries. If applicable, we accrue receivables for probable insurance or other third-party recoveries. With respect to incometax-related contingencies, we use a cumulative probability-weighted loss accrual in cases where sustaining a tax position is less than certain. See Note 19—18—Income Taxes, for additional information about incometax-related contingencies.

Based on currently available information, we believe it is remote that future costs related to known contingent liability exposures will exceed current accruals by an amount that would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. As we learn new facts concerning contingencies, we reassess our position both with respect to accrued liabilities and other potential exposures. Estimates particularly sensitive to future changes include contingent liabilities recorded for environmental remediation, tax and legal matters. Estimated future environmental remediation costs are subject to change due to such factors as the uncertain magnitude of cleanup costs, the unknown time and extent of such remedial actions that may be required, and the determination of our liability in proportion to that of other responsible parties. Estimated future costs related to tax and legal matters are subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administrative and litigation processes.

Environmental

We are subject to international, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we record accruals for environmental liabilities based on management’s best estimates, using all information that is available at the time. We measure estimates and base liabilities on currently available facts, existing technology, and presently enacted laws and regulations, taking into account stakeholder and business considerations. When measuring environmental liabilities, we also consider our prior experience in remediation of contaminated sites, other companies’ cleanup experience, and data released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other organizations. We consider unasserted claims in our determination of environmental liabilities, and we accrue them in the period they are both probable and reasonably estimable.

Although liability of those potentially responsible for environmental remediation costs is generally joint and several for federal sites and frequently so for other sites, we are usually only one of many companies cited at a particular site. Due to the joint and several liabilities, we could be responsible for all cleanup costs related to any site at which we have been designated as a potentially responsible party. We have been successful to date in sharing cleanup costs with other financially sound companies. Many of the sites at which we are potentially responsible are still under investigation by the EPA or the agency concerned. Prior to actual cleanup, those potentially responsible normally assess the site conditions, apportion responsibility and determine the appropriate remediation. In some instances, we may have no liability or may attain a settlement of liability. Where it appears that other potentially responsible parties may be financially unable to bear their proportional share, we consider this inability in estimating our potential liability, and we adjust our accruals accordingly.

As a result of various acquisitions in the past, we assumed certain environmental obligations. Some of these environmental obligations are mitigated by indemnifications made by others for our benefit, and some of the indemnifications are subject to dollar limits and time limits.

We are currently participating in environmental assessments and cleanups at numerous federal Superfund and comparable state and international sites. After an assessment of environmental exposures for cleanup and other costs, we make accruals on an undiscounted basis (except those acquired in a purchase business combination, which we record on a discounted basis) for planned investigation and remediation activities for sites where it is probable future costs will be incurred and these costs can be reasonably estimated. We have not reduced these accruals for possible insurance recoveries. In the future, we may be involved in additional environmental assessments, cleanups and proceedings. See Note 10—9—Asset Retirement Obligations and Accrued Environmental Costs, for a summary of our accrued environmental liabilities.

Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various lawsuits and claims including but not limited to matters involving oil and gas royalty and severance tax payments, gas measurement and valuation methods, contract disputes, environmental damages, personal injury, and property damage. Our primary exposures for such matters relate to alleged royalty and tax underpayments on certain federal, state and privately owned properties and claims of alleged environmental contamination from historic operations. We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously in these matters.

Our legal organization applies its knowledge, experience and professional judgment to the specific characteristics of our cases, employing a litigation management process to manage and monitor the legal proceedings against us. Our process facilitates the early evaluation and quantification of potential exposures in individual cases. This process also enables us to track those cases that have been scheduled for trial and/or mediation. Based on professional judgment and experience in using these litigation management tools and available information about current developments in all our cases, our legal organization regularly assesses the adequacy of current accruals and determines if adjustment of existing accruals, or establishment of new accruals, is required.

Other Contingencies

We have contingent liabilities resulting from throughput agreements with pipeline and processing companies not associated with financing arrangements. Under these agreements, we may be required to provide any such company with additional funds through advances and penalties for fees related to throughput capacity not utilized. In addition, at December 31, 2016,2017, we had performance obligations secured by letters of credit of $304$338 million (issued as direct bank letters of credit) related to various purchase commitments for materials, supplies, commercial activities and services incident to the ordinary conduct of business.

In 2007, we announced we had been unable to reach agreement with respect to our migration to anempresa mixta structure mandated by the Venezuelan government’s Nationalization Decree. As a result, Venezuela’s national oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA), or its affiliates, directly assumed control over ConocoPhillips’ interests in the Petrozuata and Hamaca heavy oil ventures and the offshore Corocoro development project. In response to this expropriation, we filed a request for international arbitration on November 2, 2007, with the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). An arbitration hearing was held before an ICSID tribunal during the summer of 2010. On September 3, 2013, an ICSID arbitration tribunal held that Venezuela unlawfully expropriated ConocoPhillips’ significant oil investments in June 2007. On January 17, 2017, the Tribunal reconfirmed the decision that the expropriation was unlawful. A separate arbitration phase is currently proceeding to determine the damages owed to ConocoPhillips for Venezuela’s actions. Separate arbitrations for contractual compensation against PDVSA are also pending before an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration tribunal. In addition, ConocoPhillips brought fraudulent transfer actions in the U.S. District Court of Delaware, alleging that PDVSA has taken actions to improperly expatriate assets from the United States to Venezuela in an effort to avoid judgment creditors.

In 2008, Burlington Resources, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, initiated arbitration before ICSID against The Republic of Ecuador aschallenging a resultwindfall profits tax and subsequent expropriation of the newly enacted Windfall Profits Tax Law and government-mandated renegotiation of our production sharing contracts. Despite a restraining order issued by the ICSID tribunal, Ecuador confiscated the crude oil production of Burlington and its co-venturer and sold the seized crude oil. In 2009, Ecuador took over operations in Blocks 7 and 21, fully expropriating our assets. In June 2010, the ICSID tribunal concluded it has jurisdiction to hear the expropriation claim.21. On April 24, 2012, Ecuador filed supplementalenvironmental and infrastructure counterclaims assertingagainst Burlington relating to alleged impacts to Blocks 7 and 21. Ecuador also filed the environmental damages, which we believe are not material. Theand infrastructure counterclaims relating to Blocks 7 and 21 in a separate, parallel ICSID arbitration brought by Perenco Ecuador Limited, Burlington’sco-venturer and consortium operator. Perenco and Burlington each have joint liability for the counterclaims under their joint operating agreements. On December 14, 2012, the ICSID tribunal issued a decision on liability on December 14, 2012, in favor of Burlington, finding that Ecuador’s seizure of Blocks 7 and 21 was an unlawful expropriation in violation of theEcuador-U.S. Bilateral Investment Treaty. An additional arbitration phase to determine the damages owed to ConocoPhillips for Ecuador’s actions and to address Ecuador’s counterclaims is complete. In February 2017, the ICSID tribunal unanimously awarded Burlington $380 million for Ecuador’s unlawful expropriation and breach of the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral investment treaty. The tribunal also issued a separate decision finding Ecuador to be entitled to $42 million for limited environmental and infrastructure impacts associated with the operations ofto Blocks 7 and 21. In December 2017, Burlington and its co-venturer. Ecuador recently filedentered into a request for annulmentsettlement agreement by which Ecuador agreed to pay Burlington $337 million in two installments. The first installment of this decision with ICSID.$75 million was timely paid on December 1, 2017. The schedulesecond installment of $262 million is to be paid by April 2018. The settlement includes an offset for the annulment process has not yet been set.counterclaims decision, of which Burlington is entitled to a $24 million contribution from Perenco pursuant to the joint operating agreement. The ICSID arbitration between Perenco and Ecuador remains pending.

In December 2016, ConocoPhillips Angola filed a notice of arbitration against Sonangol E.P. under the Block 36 Production Sharing Contract relating to disputes arising thereunder. The arbitration will beis being conducted under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Laws (UNCITRAL) rules using a three personthree-person tribunal.

In June 2017, FAR Ltd. initiated arbitration before the ICC against ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V. in connection with the sale of ConocoPhillips Senegal B.V. to Woodside Energy Holdings (Senegal) Limited in 2016. The arbitral tribunal is in the process of being constituted.

In 2017 and early 2018, cities and/or counties in California and New York have filed lawsuits against oil and gas companies, including ConocoPhillips, seeking compensatory damages and equitable relief to abate alleged climate change impacts. ConocoPhillips will be vigorously defending against these lawsuits.

Long-Term Throughput Agreements andTake-or-Pay Agreements

We have certain throughput agreements andtake-or-pay agreements in support of financing arrangements. The agreements typically provide for natural gas or crude oil transportation to be used in the ordinary course of the company’s business. The aggregate amounts of estimated payments under these various agreements are: 2017—$24 million; 2018—$2021 million; 2019—$7 million; 2020—$7 million; 2021—$7 million; 2022—$7 million; and 20222023 and after—$7574 million. Total payments under the agreements were $43 million in 2017, $42 million in 2016 and $27 million in 2015 and $127 million in 2014.2015.

Note 14—13—Derivative and Financial Instruments

We use futures, forwards, swaps and options in various markets to meet our customer needs and capture market opportunities. Our commodity business primarily consists of natural gas, crude oil, bitumen, LNG and natural gas liquids.

Our derivative instruments are held at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet. Where these balances have the right of setoff, they are presented on a net basis. Related cash flows are recorded as operating activities on our consolidated statement of cash flows. On our consolidated income statement, realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized either on a gross basis if directly related to our physical business or a net basis if held for trading. Gains and losses related to contracts that meet and are designated with the normal purchase normal sale exception are recognized upon settlement. We generally apply this exception to eligible crude contracts. We do not use hedge accounting for our commodity derivatives.

The following table presents the gross fair values of our commodity derivatives, excluding collateral, and the line items where they appear on our consolidated balance sheet:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  2016   2015   2017   2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets

        

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  $            268                    768    $            275                   268 

Other assets

   44     60     36    44 

Liabilities

        

Other accruals

   300     754     282    300 

Other liabilities and deferred credits

   34     46     28    34 

 

 

The gains (losses) from commodity derivatives incurred, and the line items where they appear on our consolidated income statement were:

 

   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   2016   2015   2014 
  

 

 

 

Sales and other operating revenues

  $(198)     231      523   

Other income

   (1)            

Purchased commodities

            161              (201)           (458)  

 

 

   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

 

Sales and other operating revenues

  $77     (198)    231  

Other income

       (1)     

Purchased commodities

            (61)            161           (201) 

 

 

The table below summarizes our material net exposures resulting from outstanding commodity derivative contracts:

 

  Open Position
Long/(Short)
   

Open Position

Long/(Short)

 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  2016   2015   2017   2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commodity

        

Natural gas and power (billions of cubic feet equivalent)

        

Fixed price

               (31)             (14               (29)            (31) 

Basis

        (17   12      

 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Derivatives

We have foreign currency exchange rate risk resulting from international operations. Our foreign currency exchange derivative activity primarily relates to managing our cash-related and foreign currency exchange rate exposures, such as firm commitments for capital programs or local currency tax payments, dividends and cash returns from net investments in foreign affiliates.affiliates, and investments inavailable-for-sale securities. We do not elect hedge accounting on our foreign currency exchange derivatives.

The following table presents the gross fair values of our foreign currency exchange derivatives, excluding collateral, and the line items where they appear on our consolidated balance sheet:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2017    2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets

        

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  $          1     47    $          1    1 

Other assets

   6    - 

Liabilities

        

Other accruals

   168                 8     -    168 

Other liabilities and deferred credits

   15                - 

 

 

In December 2017, we entered into foreign exchange zero cost collars buying the right to sell $1.25 billion CAD at $0.707 CAD and selling the right to buy $1.25 billion CAD at $0.842 CAD against the U.S. dollar.

The (gains) losses from foreign currency exchange derivatives incurred and the line item where they appear on our consolidated income statement were:

 

   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   2016   2015   2014 
  

 

 

 

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

  $            247             (33)                 3  

 

 
   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

 

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

  $            13            247            (33) 

 

 

We had the following net notional position of outstanding foreign currency exchange derivatives:

 

   

In Millions

Notional Currency

 
  

 

 

 
   2016     2015  
  

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Derivatives

    

Sell U.S. dollar, buy other currencies*

   USD                       13     347  

Buy U.S. dollar, sell other currencies**

   USD                       25                     20  

Buy British pound, sell other currencies***

   GBP                  1,069     567  

Sell British pound, buy Norwegian krone

   GBP                       51     -  

 

 
   

In Millions

Notional Currency

 
  

 

 

 
   2017    2016 
  

 

 

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Derivatives

    

Sell U.S. dollar, buy other currencies(1)

   USD                       -    13 

Buy U.S. dollar, sell other currencies(2)

   USD                       -    25 

Buy British pound, sell other currencies(3)

   GBP                       -                    1,069 

Sell British pound, buy other currencies(4)

   GBP                      1    51 

Sell Canadian dollar, buy U.S. dollar

   CAD              1,225    - 

 

 

    *Primarily(1)Primarily Canadian dollar, Norwegian krone anddollar.

(2)Primarily British pound.

  **(3)Primarily Canadian dollar and British pound.dollar.

***(4)Primarily Canadian dollareuro and Euro.Norwegian krone.

Financial Instruments

We have certaininvest excess cash in financial instruments with maturities based on our consolidated balance sheet relatedcash forecasts for the various currency pools we manage. The maturities of these investments may from time to interest-bearing time deposits and commercial paper. These held-to-maturityextend beyond 90 days. The types of financial instruments are includedthat we currently invest include:

Time deposits: Interest bearing deposits placed with approved financial institutions.
Commercial paper: Unsecured promissory notes issued by a corporation, commercial bank or government agency purchased at a discount to mature at par.

These financial instruments appear in the “Cash and cash equivalents” online of our consolidated balance sheet if the maturities at the time we made the investments were 90 days or less; otherwise, these investmentsfinancial instruments are included in the “Short-term investments” line on our consolidated balance sheet.

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Carrying Amount   Carrying Amount 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Cash and Cash Equivalents     Short-Term Investments     Cash and Cash Equivalents    Short-Term Investments 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2016     2015     2017    2016    2017    2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash

  $                           623                            528                              -                                -    $                       948                       623                             -                               - 

Time deposits

                

Remaining maturities from 1 to 90 days

   2,987     1,840     39     -     5,004    2,987    821    39 

Remaining maturities from 91 to 180 days

   -     -     11     -     -    -    -    11 

Commercial paper

        

Remaining maturities from 1 to 90 days

   373    -    978    - 

Remaining maturities from 91 to 180 days

   -    -    74    - 

 

 
  $3,610     2,368     50     -    $6,325    3,610    1,873    50 

 

 

Credit Risk

Financial instruments potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments,over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts and trade receivables. Our cash equivalents and short-term investments are placed in high-quality commercial paper, government money market funds, government debt securities and time deposits with major international banks and financial institutions.

The credit risk from our OTC derivative contracts, such as forwards, swaps and swaps,options, derives from the counterparty to the transaction. Individual counterparty exposure is managed within predetermined credit limits and includes the use of cash-call margins when appropriate, thereby reducing the risk of significant nonperformance. We also use futures, swaps and option contracts that have a negligible credit risk because these trades are cleared with an exchange clearinghouse and subject to mandatory margin requirements until settled; however, we are exposed to the credit risk of those exchange brokers for receivables arising from daily margin cash calls, as well as for cash deposited to meet initial margin requirements.

Our trade receivables result primarily from our petroleum operations and reflect a broad national and international customer base, which limits our exposure to concentrations of credit risk. The majority of these receivables have payment terms of 30 days or less, and we continually monitor this exposure and the creditworthiness of the counterparties. We do not generally require collateral to limit the exposure to loss; however, we will sometimes use letters of credit, prepayments and master netting arrangements to mitigate credit risk with counterparties that both buy from and sell to us, as these agreements permit the amounts owed by us or owed to others to be offset against amounts due to us.

Certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to post collateral if the derivative exposure exceeds a threshold amount. We have contracts with fixed threshold amounts and other contracts with variable threshold amounts that are contingent on our credit rating. The variable threshold amounts typically decline for lower credit ratings, while both the variable and fixed threshold amounts typically revert to zero if we fall below investment grade. Cash is the primary collateral in all contracts; however, many also permit us to post letters of credit as collateral, such as transactions administered through the New York Mercantile Exchange.

The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with such credit risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, was $42$55 million and $158$42 million, respectively. For these instruments, no collateral was posted as of December 31, 2016, and $2 million of collateral was posted as of2017, or December 31, 2015.

2016. If our credit rating had been downgraded below investment grade on December 31, 2016,2017, we would be required to post $42$55 million of additional collateral, either with cash or letters of credit.

Note 15—14—Fair Value Measurement

We carry a portion of our assets and liabilities at fair value that are measured at a reporting date using an exit price (i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability) and disclosed according to the quality of valuation inputs under the following hierarchy:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value of assets or liabilities.

The classification of an asset or liability is based on the lowest level of input significant to its fair value. Those that are initially classified as Level 3 are subsequently reported as Level 2 when the fair value derived from unobservable inputs is inconsequential to the overall fair value, or if corroborated market data becomes available. Assets and liabilities initially reported as Level 2 are subsequently reported as Level 3 if corroborated market data is no longer available. Transfers occur at the end of the reporting period. At the end of the fourth quarter of 2017, our $1,899 million investment in Cenovus Energy was transferred from Level 2 to Level 1 due to the lapsing of trading restrictions. There were no other material transfers in or out of Level 1 during 20162017 or 2015.2016.

Recurring Fair Value Measurement

Financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis primarily include commodity derivatives. Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities primarily represent exchange-traded futures and options that are valued using unadjusted prices available from the underlying exchange. This also includes our investment in common shares of Cenovus Energy, which is valued using quotes for shares on the New York Stock Exchange. Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities primarily represent OTC swaps, options and forward purchase and sale contracts that are valued using adjusted exchange prices, prices provided by brokers or pricing service companies that are all corroborated by market data. Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities consist of OTC swaps, options and forward purchase and sale contracts where a significant portion of fair value is calculated from underlying market data that is not readily available. The derived value uses industry standard methodologies that may consider the historical relationships among various commodities, modeled market prices, time value, volatility factors and other relevant economic measures. The use of these inputs results in management’s best estimate of fair value. Level 3 activity was not material for all periods presented.

The following table summarizes the fair value hierarchy for gross financial assets and liabilities (i.e., unadjusted where the right of setoff exists for commodity derivatives accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis):

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  December 31, 2016   December 31, 2015   December 31, 2017   December 31, 2016 
       Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total       Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total         Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total      Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets

                                

Investment in Cenovus Energy

  $1,899    -    -    1,899    -    -    -    - 

Commodity derivatives

  $194     96     22     312     516     242     70     828     175    106    30    311    194    96    22    312 

 

 

Total assets

  $    194           96         22         312            516         242         70            828    $    2,074        106        30        2,210           194        96        22           312 

 

 

Liabilities

                                

Commodity derivatives

  $207     105     22     334     515     273     12     800    $158    111    41    310    207    105    22    334 

 

 

Total liabilities

  $207     105     22     334     515     273     12     800    $158    111    41    310    207    105    22    334 

 

 

The following table summarizes those commodity derivative balances subject to the right of setoff as presented on our consolidated balance sheet. We have elected to offset the recognized fair value amounts for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty in our financial statements when a legal right of offset exists.

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  Gross
Amounts
Recognized
   Gross
Amounts
Offset
   Net
Amounts
Presented
   Cash
Collateral
   

Gross Amounts
without

Right of Setoff

   Net
Amounts
 
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

            

Assets

  $311    186    125    -    4    121 

Liabilities

   310    186    124    7    5    112 
  Gross
Amounts
Recognized
   Gross
Amounts
Offset
   Net
Amounts
Presented
   Cash
Collateral
   Gross Amounts
without
Right of Setoff
   Net
Amounts
 

 
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

                        

Assets

  $312     221     91     -     5     86    $312    221    91    -    5    86 

Liabilities

   334     221     113     12     12     89     334    221    113    12    12    89 

 

 

December 31, 2015

            

Assets

  $828     600     228     -     8     220  

Liabilities

   800     600     200     1     11     188  

 

At December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, we did not present any amounts gross on our consolidated balance sheet where we had the right of setoff.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurement

The following table summarizes the fair value hierarchy by major category and date of remeasurement for assets accounted for at fair value on anon-recurring basis:

 

   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
     
 
Fair Value
Measurements Using
  
  
  
    

 

 

   
   Fair Value     
 
Level 1
Inputs
  
  
   
 
Level 3
Inputs
  
  
   
 
Before-Tax
Loss
  
  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

        

Net PP&E (held for use)

        

March 31, 2016

  $217     -     217     129  

June 30, 2016

   23     -     23     53  

December 31, 2016

   13     -     13     29  

Net PP&E (held for sale)

        

September 30, 2016

   217     217     -     99  

Cost and equity method investments

        

December 31, 2016

   90     4     86     40  

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

        

Net PP&E (held for use)

        

March 31, 2015

  $-     -     -     9  

June 30, 2015

   42     -     42     70  

September 30, 2015

   -     -     -     7  

December 31, 2015

   440     -     440     595  

Net PP&E (unproved property)

        

September 30, 2015

   104     -     104     240  

Equity method investments

        

December 31, 2015

       10,210     -         10,210         1,507  

 

 

   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
     
Fair Value
Measurements Using
 
 
  
    

 

 

   
   Fair Value    
Level 1
Inputs
 
 
   
Level 3
Inputs
 
 
   
Before-Tax
Loss
 
 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2017

        

Net PP&E (held for use)

        

December 31, 2017

  $75    -    75    154 

Net PP&E (held for sale)

        

June 30, 2017

   2,830    2,830    -    3,882 

December 31, 2017

   113    113    -    78 

Cost and equity method investments

        

June 30, 2017

   7,656    -    7,656    2,384 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

        

Net PP&E (held for use)

        

March 31, 2016

  $217    -    217    129 

June 30, 2016

   23    -    23    53 

December 31, 2016

   13    -    13    29 

Net PP&E (held for sale)

        

September 30, 2016

   217    217    -    99 

Cost and equity method investments

        

December 31, 2016

       90    4        86        40 

 

 

Net PP&E (held for use)

Net PP&E held for use is comprised of various producing properties impaired to their individual fair values less costs to sell. The fair values were determined by internal discounted cash flow models using estimates of future production, prices from futures exchanges and pricing service companies, costs, and a discount rate believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants.

Net PP&E (held for sale)

Net PP&E held for sale was written down to fair value, less costs to sell. The fair value of each asset was determined by its negotiated selling price.

Net PP&E (unproved property)

Net PP&E unproved property is comprised of unproved leaseholds impaired to our best estimate of sales value less costs to sell.

Equity Method Investments

Certain cost and equity method investments were determined to have fair values below their carrying amounts, and the impairments were considered to be other than temporary under the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 323. AnDuring 2017, this included our investment in APLNG, which was written down to its fair value of $7,656 million, resulting in abefore-tax-charge of $2,384 million. For additional information on APLNG, see Note 5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables. During 2016, an investment using Level 1 inputs was written down to fair value, less costs to sell, determined by its negotiated selling price. Investments using Level 3 inputs had fair values determined primarily by internal discounted cash flow models using estimates of future production, prices from futures exchanges and pricing service companies, costs, and a discount factor believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants. During 2015, this primarily included our investment in APLNG, which was written down to its fair value of $10,185 million, resulting in a charge of $1,502 million before-tax. For additional information on APLNG, see Note 7—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables.

Reported Fair Values of Financial Instruments

We used the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of financial instruments:

 

Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments: The carrying amount reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.
Accounts and notes receivable (including long-term and related parties): The carrying amount reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value. The valuation technique and methods used to estimate the fair value of the current portion of fixed-rate related party loans is consistent with Loans and advances—related parties.
Investment in Cenovus Energy shares: See Note 6—Investment in Cenovus Energy for a discussion of the carrying value and fair value of our investment in Cenovus Energy shares.
Loans and advances—related parties: The carrying amount of floating-rate loans approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate loan activity is measured using market observable data and is categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for additional information.
Accounts payable (including related parties) and floating-rate debt: The carrying amount of accounts payable and floating-rate debt reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.
Fixed-rate debt: The estimated fair value of fixed-rate debt is measured using prices available from a pricing service that is corroborated by market data; therefore, these liabilities are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

The following table summarizes the net fair value of financial instruments (i.e., adjusted where the right of setoff exists for commodity derivatives):

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  Carrying Amount   Fair Value   Carrying Amount   Fair Value 
           2016             2015             2016             2015             2017            2016            2017            2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financial assets

                

Investment in Cenovus Energy

  $1,899    -    1,899    - 

Commodity derivatives

  $91     228     91     228     125    91    125    91 

Total loans and advances—related parties

   701     808     701     808     586    701    586    701 

Financial liabilities

                

Total debt, excluding capital leases

   26,423     24,062     29,307     24,785     18,929    26,423    22,435    29,307 

Commodity derivatives

   101     199     101     199     117    101    117    101 

 

 

Commodity derivatives

At December 31, 2017, commodity derivative assets and liabilities appear net with no obligations to return cash collateral and $7 million of rights to reclaim cash collateral, respectively. At December 31, 2016, commodity derivative assets and liabilities appear net with no obligations to return cash collateral and $12 million of rights to reclaim cash collateral, respectively. At December 31, 2015, commodity derivative assets and liabilities appear net with no obligations to return cash collateral and $1 million of rights to reclaim cash collateral, respectively.

Note 16—15—Equity

Common Stock

The changes in our shares of common stock, as categorized in the equity section of the balance sheet, were:

 

  Shares   Shares 
   2016     2015     2014     2017    2016    2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Issued

            

Beginning of year

   1,778,226,388     1,773,583,368     1,768,169,906     1,782,079,107    1,778,226,388    1,773,583,368 

Distributed under benefit plans

   3,852,719     4,643,020     5,413,462     3,340,068    3,852,719    4,643,020 

 

 

End of year

   1,782,079,107     1,778,226,388     1,773,583,368     1,785,419,175    1,782,079,107    1,778,226,388 

 

 

Held in Treasury

            

Beginning of year

   542,230,673     542,230,673     542,230,673     544,809,771    542,230,673    542,230,673 

Repurchase of common stock

   2,579,098     -     -     63,502,263    2,579,098    - 

 

 

End of year

   544,809,771     542,230,673     542,230,673     608,312,034    544,809,771    542,230,673 

 

 

Preferred Stock

We have authorized 500 million shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, none of which was issued or outstanding at December 31, 20162017 or 2015.2016.

Noncontrolling Interests

At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, we had $252$194 million and $320$252 million outstanding, respectively, of equity in less-than-wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries held by noncontrolling interest owners. For both periods, the amounts were related to the Darwin LNG and Bayu-Darwin Pipeline operating joint ventures we control.

Repurchase of Common Stock

On November 10, 2016, we announced plans to purchase up to $3 billion of our common stock overthrough 2019. On March 29, 2017, we announced plans to double our share repurchase program to $6 billion of common stock through 2019, with $3 billion allocated and purchased in 2017, and the next three years.remainder allocated evenly to 2018 and 2019. On February 1, 2018, we announced the acceleration of our previously stated 2018 share repurchases from $1.5 billion to $2.0 billion, with the remaining balance to be repurchased in 2019. Repurchase of shares began in November 2016, and totaled 2,579,09866,081,361 shares at a cost of $126$3,126 million, through December 31, 2016.2017.

Note 17—16—Non-Mineral Leases

The company primarily leases drilling equipment and office buildings, as well as ocean transport vessels, tugboats, barges, corporate aircraft, computers and other facilities and equipment. Certain leases include escalation clauses for adjusting rental payments to reflect changes in price indices, as well as renewal options and/or options to purchase the leased property for the fair market value at the end of the lease term. There are no significant restrictions imposed on us by the leasing agreements with regard to dividends, asset dispositions or borrowing ability. For additional information on leased assets under capital leases, see Note 11—10—Debt.

At December 31, 2016,2017, future minimum rental payments due under noncancelable leases were:

 

  Millions
of Dollars
   Millions
of Dollars
 

2017

  $277   

2018

   238     $278  

2019

   172      214  

2020

   390      414  

2021

   114      126  

2022

   307  

Remaining years

   435      209  

 

 

Total

   1,626      1,548  

Less: income from subleases

   (15)     (11) 

 

 

Net minimum operating lease payments

  $        1,611     $        1,537  

 

 

Operating lease rental expense for the years ended December 31 was:

 

   Millions of Dollars 
  Millions of Dollars   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2014     2017    2016  2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total rentals

  $537      432      474     $264     537   432  

Less: sublease rentals

   (8)     (9)     (10)     (20)    (10) (9) 

 

 
  $        529              423              464     $        244             527           423  

 

 

*Amount updated to reflect additional sublease income in 2016.

Note 18—17—Employee Benefit Plans

Pension and Postretirement Plans

An analysis of the projected benefit obligations for our pension plans and accumulated benefit obligations for our postretirement health and life insurance plans follows:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  Pension Benefits   Other Benefits   Pension Benefits   Other Benefits 
  2016   2015   2016   2015    2017    2016    2017    2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.           U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.         
  

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

     

Change in Benefit Obligation

                        

Benefit obligation at January 1

  $3,772      3,321      4,387      3,984          352          716     $3,416     3,445     3,772     3,321         286         352  

Service cost

   108      76      138      124                89     77     108     76          

Interest cost

   133      120      161      135      13      22      118     103     133     120         13  

Plan participant contributions

                       24      21                      23     24  

Plan amendments

                       (27)     (303)                         (27) 

Actuarial (gain) loss

   247      466      (212)     (442)     (14)     (49)     244     52     247     466     12     (14) 

Benefits paid

   (872)     (148)     (729)     (162)     (68)     (63)     (631)    (117)    (872)    (148)    (68)    (68) 

Curtailment

   14      10      27      (43)                       14     10          

Settlement

        (46)                                     (46)         

Recognition of termination benefits

   14                68                        14              

Foreign currency exchange rate change

        (358)          (348)          (4)         283         (358)         

 

 

Benefit obligation at December 31*

  $3,416      3,445      3,772      3,321      286      352     $    3,236         3,845         3,416         3,445         265         286  

 

 

*Accumulated benefit obligation portion of above at December 31:

  $3,246      3,067      3,573      2,953         $3,076      3,404     3,246     3,067      

Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets

                        

Fair value of plan assets at January 1

  $2,606      3,063      3,266      3,278               $2,081     3,068     2,606     3,063          

Actual return on plan assets

   133      397      (4)     96                336     313     133     397          

Company contributions

   214      125      73      120      44      42      755     114     214     125     45     44  

Plan participant contributions

                       24      21                      23     24  

Benefits paid

   (872)     (148)     (729)     (162)     (68)     (63)     (631)    (117)    (872)    (148)    (68)    (68) 

Foreign currency exchange rate change

        (372)          (274)                   267         (372)         

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at December 31

  $    2,081          3,068          2,606          3,063               $    2,541         3,647         2,081         3,068          

 

 

Funded Status

  $(1,335)     (377)     (1,166)     (258)     (286)     (352)    $(695)    (198)    (1,335)    (377)    (265)    (286) 

 

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  Pension Benefits   Other Benefits   Pension Benefits   Other Benefits 
  2016   2015   2016   2015   2017   2016   2017   2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.           U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.         
  

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

     

Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31

                        

Noncurrent assets

  $-            164                  -            175                  -                  -     $-           205                 -           164                 -             -  

Current liabilities

   (101)       (7)     (99)     (34)     (44)     (45)     (38)      (4)    (101)    (7)    (45)    (44) 

Noncurrent liabilities

   (1,234)       (534)     (1,067)     (399)     (242)     (307)     (657)      (399)    (1,234)    (534)    (220)    (242) 

 

 

Total recognized

  $    (1,335)       (377)     (1,166)     (258)     (286)     (352)    $    (695)      (198)    (1,335)    (377)    (265)    (286) 

 

 

Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at December 31

                        

Discount rate

   3.95%     3.00      4.50      3.95      3.60      3.90      3.55%    2.80     3.95     3.00     3.30     3.60  

Rate of compensation increase

   4.00         3.85      4.00      4.05                4.00        3.75     4.00     3.85          

 

 

Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost for Years Ended December 31

                        

Discount rate

   3.90%     3.95      4.00      3.55      3.75      4.05      3.80%    3.00     3.90     3.95     3.60     3.75  

Expected return on plan assets

   7.00         5.45      7.00      
5.40 
  
    -           6.55        5.05     7.00     5.45      -      

Rate of compensation increase

   4.00         4.05      4.75      4.35                4.00        3.85     4.00     4.05          

 

 

For both U.S. and international pensions, the overall expected long-term rate of return is developed from the expected future return of each asset class, weighted by the expected allocation of pension assets to that asset class. We rely on a variety of independent market forecasts in developing the expected rate of return for each class of assets.

Included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31 were the followingbefore-tax amounts that had not been recognized in net periodic benefit cost:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  Pension Benefits   Other Benefits   Pension Benefits   Other Benefits 
  2016   2015   2016   2015   2017   2016   2017   2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.           U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.         
  

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

     

Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss

  $        748          479             773          273          (27)       (18)    $        588         358            748         479         (12)      (27) 

Unrecognized prior service cost (credit)

        (20)          (30)     (285)     (292)         (16)        (20)    (249)    (285) 

 

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  Pension Benefits   Other Benefits   Pension Benefits   Other Benefits 
  2016   2015   2016   2015   2017   2016   2017   2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.           U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.         
  

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

     

Sources of Change in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

                        

Net gain (loss) arising during the period

  $  (263)     (232)             61      490      14      41     $  (40)    71     (263)    (232)    (12)    14  

Amortization of (gain) loss included in net loss*

   288      26      312              89      (5)       

Amortization of (gain) loss included in income (loss)*

   200     50     288     26     (3)    (5) 

 

 

Net change during the period

  $25        (206)     373      579              9      43     $160       121        25       (206)      (15)            9  

 

 

Prior service credit (cost) arising during the period

  $     (4)          (2)     27      303     $            (4)        27  

Amortization of prior service cost (credit) included in net loss

        (6)          (11)     (34)     (15)  

Amortization of prior service cost (credit) included in income (loss)

       (6)        (6)    (36)    (34) 

 

 

Net change during the period

  $     (10)          (13)     (7)     288     $    (4)        (10)    (36)    (7) 

 

 

*Includes settlement losses recognized in 20162017 and 2015.2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, there was an amendment to the U.S. other postretirement benefit plan. The benefit obligation decreased by $27 million for changes in the plan made topost-65 retiree medical benefits related to updated cost sharing assumption changes for retirees. The $27 million decrease in the benefit obligation resulted in a corresponding increase in other comprehensive income.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, there were amendments to the U.S. other postretirement benefit plan. The benefit obligation decreased by $303 million for changes in the plan made to retiree medical benefits. The $303 million decrease consists of $149 million related to the discontinuation of all company premium cost-sharing contributions to the post-65 retiree medical plan after December 31, 2025, $91 million related to updated cost sharing assumption changes for retirees, $49 million associated with excluding employees and retirees of Phillips 66 who were not enrolled in a ConocoPhillips retiree medical plan as of July 1, 2015, and $14 million associated with new participants in the post-65 retiree medical plan after December 31, 2015, no longer being eligible for any company premium cost-sharing contributions. The $303 million decrease in the benefit obligation resulted in a corresponding decrease in other comprehensive loss.

Included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss at December 31, 2016,2017, were the followingbefore-tax amounts that are expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost during 2017:2018:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  Pension
Benefits
   Other
Benefits
   Pension
Benefits
   Other
Benefits
 
          U.S.           Int’l.               U.S.           Int’l.     
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss

  $        75              48      (3)    $        59             36     (1) 

Unrecognized prior service cost (credit)

        (5)     (36)  

 

Unrecognized prior service credit

       (5)    (34) 

For ourtax-qualified pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets, the projected benefit obligation, the accumulated benefit obligation, and the fair value of plan assets were $5,634 million, $5,226 million, and $5,113 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017, and $5,498 million, $5,145 million, and $4,208 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016, and $5,720 million, $5,314 million, and $4,759 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015.2016.

For our unfunded nonqualified key employee supplemental pension plans, the projected benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation were $578 million and $503 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017, and were $586 million and $496 million, respectively, at December 31, 2016, and were $639 million and $564 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015.2016.

The components of net periodic benefit cost of all defined benefit plans are presented in the following table:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  Pension Benefits   Other Benefits   Pension Benefits   Other Benefits 
  2016   2015   2014   2016   2015   2014   2017   2016   2015   2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.               U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.   U.S.   Int’l.             
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

         

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

                                    

Service cost

  $    108            76          138          124          124          109              2              4              3     $      89           77         108           76         138         124             2             2             4  

Interest cost

   133      120      161      135      165      166      13      22      29      118     103     133     120     161     135         13     22  

Expected return on plan assets

   (149)     (147)     (201)     (164)     (213)     (181)                    (132)    (158)    (149)    (147)    (201)    (164)             

Amortization of prior service cost (credit)

        (6)          (7)          (8)     (34)     (17)     (4)         (6)        (6)        (7)    (36)    (34)    (17) 

Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)

   86      26      115      82      77      57      (2)          (3)     69     50     86     26     115     82     (3)    (2)     

Settlements

   202           197                                    131         202         197                  

Curtailment (gain) loss

   14           35      (4)                                      14         35     (4)             

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $399      69      451      173      159      143      (20)     13      25     $279     66     399     69     451     173     (28)    (20)    13  

 

 

We recognized pension settlement losses of $131 million in 2017, $202 million in 2016 and $204 million in 2015 aslump-sum benefit payments from certain U.S. and international pension plans exceeded the sum of service and interest costs for those plans and led to recognition of settlement losses.

As part of the 2016 and 2015 restructuring programs, we concluded that actions taken during those years resulted in a significant reduction of future services of active employees primarily in the U.S. qualified pension plan and a U.S. nonqualified supplemental retirement plan. As a result, we recognized an increase in the benefit obligation and a proportionate share of prior service cost from other comprehensive income (loss) as curtailment losses of $15 million and $33 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Also as part of the 2016 and 2015 restructuring programs in the U.S. and Europe, we recognized expense for special termination benefits of $15 million during the year ended December 31, 2016, consisting of $14 million in the U.S. and $1 million in Europe, and $124 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, consisting of $46 million in the U.S. and $78 million in Europe. Approximately 62 percent of the 2015 Europe amount was recovered from joint venture partners.

In determining net pension and other postretirement benefit costs, we amortize prior service costs on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. For net actuarial gains and losses, we amortize 10 percent of the unamortized balance each year.

We have multiple nonpension postretirement benefit plans for health and life insurance. The health care plans are contributory and subject to various cost sharing features, with participant and company contributions adjusted annually; the life insurance plans are noncontributory. The measurement of the U.S.pre-65 retiree medical accumulated postretirement benefit obligation assumes a health care cost trend rate of 6.506.25 percent in 20172018 that declines to 5 percent by 2023. The measurement of the U.S.post-65 retiree medical accumulated postretirement benefit obligation assumes aan ultimate health care cost trend rate of 4 percent in 2017 that increases to 5 percent byachieved in 2018. Aone-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would be immaterial to ConocoPhillips.

Plan Assets—We follow a policy of broadly diversifying pension plan assets across asset classes and individual holdings. As a result, our plan assets have no significant concentrations of credit risk. Asset classes that are considered appropriate include U.S. equities,non-U.S. equities, U.S. fixed income,non-U.S. fixed income, real estate and private equity investments. Plan fiduciaries may consider and add other asset classes to the investment program from time to time. The target allocations for plan assets are 5743 percent equity securities, 3750 percent debt securities, and 6 percent real estate.estate and 1 percent other. Generally, the plan investments are publicly traded, therefore minimizing liquidity risk in the portfolio.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the pension plan assets. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 20162017 and 2015.2016.

 

Fair values of equity securities and government debt securities categorized in Level 1 are primarily based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Fair values of corporate debt securities, agency and mortgage-backed securities and government debt securities categorized in Level 2 are estimated using recently executed transactions and quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active. If there have been no market transactions in a particular fixed income security, its fair value is calculated by pricing models that benchmark the security against other securities with actual market prices. When observable quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based on pricing models that use something other than actual market prices (e.g., observable inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades and issuer spreads for similar securities), and these securities are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Fair values of investments in common/collective trusts are determined by the issuer of each fund based on the fair value of the underlying assets.
Fair values of mutual funds are based on quoted market prices, which represent the net asset value of shares held.
Time deposits are valued at cost, which approximates fair value.
Cash is valued at cost, which approximates fair value. Fair values of international cash equivalents categorized in Level 2 are valued using observable yield curves, discounting and interest rates. U.S. cash balances held in the form of short-term fund units that are redeemable at the measurement date are categorized as Level 2.
Fair values of exchange-traded derivatives classified in Level 1 are based on quoted market prices. For other derivatives classified in Level 2, the values are generally calculated from pricing models with market input parameters from third-party sources.
Fair values of insurance contracts are valued at the present value of the future benefit payments owed by the insurance company to the plans’ participants.
Fair values of real estate investments are valued using real estate valuation techniques and other methods that include reference to third-party sources and sales comparables where available.
A portion of U.S. pension plan assets is held as a participating interest in an insurance annuity contract, which is calculated as the market value of investments held under this contract, less the accumulated benefit obligation covered by the contract. The participating interest is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy as the fair value is determined via a combination of quoted market prices, recently executed transactions, and an actuarial present value computation for contract obligations. At December 31, 2017, the participating interest in the annuity contract was valued at $99 million and consisted of $265 million in debt securities, less $166 million for the accumulated benefit obligation covered by the contract. At December 31, 2016, the participating interest in the annuity contract was valued at $121 million and consisted of $288 million in debt securities, less $167 million for the accumulated benefit obligation covered by the contract. At December 31, 2015, the participating interest in the annuity contract was valued at $125 million and consisted of $305 million in debt securities, less $180 million for the accumulated benefit obligation covered by the contract. The net change from 20152016 to 20162017 is due to a decrease in the fair value of the underlying investments of $17$23 million offset by a decrease in the present value of the contract obligation of $13$1 million. The participating interest is not available for meeting general pension benefit obligations in the near term. No future company contributions are required and no new benefits are being accrued under this insurance annuity contract.

The fair values of our pension plan assets at December 31, by asset class were as follows:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  U.S.       International   U.S.       International 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

 
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total       Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total       Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

 

2016

                  

2017

                  

Equity Securities

                                    

U.S.

  $632     -     14     646       628     -     -     628    $161    -    14    175      440    -    -    440 

International

   342     -     -     342       428     -     -     428     178    -    -    178      315    -    -    315 

Common/collective trusts

   62     -     -     62       -     156     -     156     -    -    -    -      -    183    -    183 

Mutual funds

   -     -     -     -       268     139     -     407     146    -    -    146      292    165    -    457 

Debt Securities

                                    

Government

   -     38     -     38       470     -     -     470     -    -    -    -      902    -    -    902 

Corporate

   -     54     3     57       -     -     -     -     -    2    -    2      -    -    -    - 

Common/collective trusts

   -     -     -     -       -     385     -     385     -    -    -    -      -    648    -    648 

Mutual funds

   -     -     -     -       137     -     -     137     -    -    -    -      144    -    -    144 

Cash and cash equivalents

   -     -     -     -       48     -     -     48     -    -    -    -      111    -    -    111 

Time deposits

   -    -    -    -      3    -    -    3 

Derivatives

   -     -  ��  -     -       18     -     -     18     -    -    -    -      5    -    -    5 

Real estate

   -     -     -     -       -     -     111     111     -    -    -    -       -    -    123    123 

 

Total in fair value hierarchy

  $1,036     92     17     1,145       1,997     680     111     2,788    $485    2    14    501      2,212    996    123    3,331 

Investments measured at net asset value*

                                    

Equity Securities

                                    

Common/collective trusts

  $-     -     -     410       -     -     -     -    $-    -    -    805      -    -    -    - 

Debt Securities

                                    

Corporate

   -     -     -     -       -     -     -     155     -    -    -    -      -    -    -    172 

Agency and mortgage-backed securities

   -     -     -     -       -     -     -     27     -    -    -    -      -    -    -    15 

Common/collective trusts

   -     -     -     312       -     -     -     -     -    -    -    1,042      -    -    -    - 

Cash and cash equivalents

   -     -     -     36       -     -     -     11     -    -    -    17      -    -    -    24 

Real estate

   -     -     -     69       -     -     -     76     -    -    -    74      -    -    -    94 

 

 

Total**

  $1,036     92     17     1,972       1,997     680     111     3,057    $485    2    14    2,439      2,212    996    123    3,636 

 

 

*In   *In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 715, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits,” certain investments that are to be measured at fair value using the net asset value      per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to      permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets.

**Excludes the participating interest in the insurance annuity contract with a net asset value of $121$99 million and net payablesreceivables related to security transactions of     $1 million$14 million..

The fair values of our pension plan assets at December 31, by asset class were as follows:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  U.S.     International   U.S.       International 
�� 

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

 
  Level 1   Level 2 Level 3   Total     Level 1 Level 2   Level 3   Total   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total       Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

 

2015

               

2016

                  

Equity Securities

                                 

U.S.

  $777     3   2     782      609    -     -     609    $632    -    14    646      628    -    -    628 

International

   485     -    -     485      450    -     -     450     342    -    -    342      428    -    -    428 

Common/collective trusts

   -     -    -     -      -   214     -     214     -    -    -    -      -    156    -    156 

Mutual funds

   -     -    -     -      234   106     -     340     62    -    -    62      268    139    -    407 

Debt Securities

                                 

Government

   85     56    -     141      493    -     -     493     -    38    -    38      470    -    -    470 

Corporate

   -     331   17     348      -    -     -     -     -    54    3    57      -    -    -    - 

Agency and mortgage-backed securities

   -     80    -     80      -    -     -     -  

Common/collective trusts

   -     -    -     -      -   406     -     406     -    -    -    -      -    385    -    385 

Mutual funds

   -     -    -     -      136    -     -     136     -    -    -    -      137    -    -    137 

Cash and cash equivalents

   -     -    -     -      46    -     -     46     -    -    -    -      48    -    -    48 

Derivatives

   -     (7  -     (7    (26  -     -     (26   -    -    -    -      18    -    -    18 

Real estate

   -     -    -     -      -    -     104     104     -    -    -    -      -    -    111    111 

 

 

Total in fair value hierarchy

  $1,347     463   19     1,829      1,942   726     104     2,772    $1,036    92    17    1,145      1,997    680    111    2,788 

Investments measured at net asset value*

                                 

Equity Securities

                                 

Common/collective trusts

  $-     -    -     569      -    -     -     -    $-    -    -    410      -    -    -    - 

Debt Securities

                                 

Corporate

   -     -    -     -      -    -     -     172     -    -    -    -      -    -    -    155 

Agency and mortgage-backed securities

   -     -    -     -      -    -     -     36     -    -    -    -      -    -    -    27 

Common/collective trusts

   -    -    -    312      -    -    -    - 

Cash and cash equivalents

   -     -    -     60      -    -     -     10     -    -    -    36      -    -    -    11 

Real estate

   -     -    -     63      -    -     -     65     -    -    -    69      -    -    -    76 

 

 

Total**

  $1,347     463   19     2,521      1,942   726     104     3,055    $1,036    92    17    1,972      1,997    680    111    3,057 

 

 

*In   *In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 715, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits,” certain investments that are to be measured at fair value using the net asset

     value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are

     intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets.

**Excludes the participating interest in the insurance annuity contract with a net asset value of $125$121 million and net payables related to security transactions of     $32$1 million.

Level 3 activity was not material for all periods.

Our funding policy for U.S. plans is to contribute at least the minimum required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Contributions to foreign plans are dependent upon local laws and tax regulations. In 2017,2018, we expect to contribute approximately $320$80 million to our domestic qualified and nonqualified pension and postretirement benefit plans and $110$130 million to our international qualified and nonqualified pension and postretirement benefit plans.

The following benefit payments, which are exclusive of amounts to be paid from the insurance annuity contract and which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  

Pension

Benefits

     Other
Benefits
   

Pension

Benefits

     Other
Benefits
 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
      U.S.           Int’l.                 U.S.           Int’l.           
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

2017

   $    352     116      42  

2018

   290     131      39     $    383    122     40 

2019

   287     124      36     302    141     37 

2020

   277     129      34     290    135     34 

2021

   292     137      30     286    144     31 

2022–2026

   1,374     729      109  

2022

   291    144     28 

2023–2027

   1,247    780     91 

 

 

Severance Accrual

As a result of selling our 50 percent nonoperated interest in the current business environment’s impact onFCCL Partnership and the majority of our operating and capital plans,western Canada gas assets, as well as our interest in the San Juan Basin, a reduction in our overall employee workforce occurred during 2015 and 2016.2017. Severance accruals of $129$65 million were recorded in 2016.2017. The following table summarizes our severance accrual activity for the year ended December 31, 2016:2017:

 

   Millions of Dollars 

Balance at December 31, 20152016

  $15680  

Accruals

   12965  

Benefit payments

   (206)(93) 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

    

 

 

Balance at December 31, 20162017

  $8053  

 

 

Of the remaining balance at December 31, 2016, $522017, $30 million is classified as short-term.

Defined Contribution Plans

Most U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the ConocoPhillips Savings Plan (CPSP). Employees can deposit up to 75 percent of their eligible pay, subject to statutory limits, in the CPSP to a choice of approximately 34 investment funds. In 2016, employeesoptions. Employees who participate in the CPSP and contribute 1 percent of their eligible pay receive a 6 percent company cash match with a potential company discretionary cash contribution of up to 6 percent. Company contributions charged to expense for the CPSP and predecessor plans were $51 million in 2017, $58 million in 2016, and $109 million in 2015, and $116 million in 2014.2015.

We have several defined contribution plans for our international employees, each with its own terms and eligibility depending on location. Total compensation expense recognized for these international plans was approximately $35 million in 2017, $44 million in 2016, and $55 million in 2015, and $66 million in 2014.2015.

Share-Based Compensation Plans

The 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (the Plan) was approved by shareholders in May 2014. Over its10-year life, the Plan allows the issuance of up to 79 million shares of our common stock for compensation to our employees and directors; however, as of the effective date of the Plan, (i) any shares of common stock available for future awards under the prior plans and (ii) any shares of common stock represented by awards granted under the prior plans that are forfeited, expire or are cancelled without delivery of shares of common stock or which result in the forfeiture of shares of common stock back to the company shall be available for awards under the Plan, and no new awards shall be granted under the prior plans. Of the 79 million shares available for issuance under the Plan, no more than 40 million shares of common stock are available for incentive stock options. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee

of our Board of Directors is authorized to determine the types, terms, conditions and limitations of awards granted.

Awards may be granted in the form of, but not limited to, stock options, restricted stock units and performance share units to employees and nonemployeenon-employee directors who contribute to the company’s continued success and profitability.

Total share-based compensation expense is measured using the grant date fair value for our equity-classified awards and the settlement date fair value for our liability-classified awards. We recognize share-based compensation expense over the shorter of the service period (i.e., the stated period of time required to earn the award); or the period beginning at the start of the service period and ending when an employee first becomes eligible for retirement, but not less than six months, as this is the minimum period of time required for an award to not be subject to forfeiture. Our share-based compensation programs generally provide accelerated vesting (i.e., a waiver of the remaining period of service required to earn an award) for awards held by employees at the time of their retirement. Some of our share-based awards vest ratably (i.e., portions of the award vest at different times) while some of our awards cliff vest (i.e., all of the award vests at the same time). We recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the service period for the entire award, whether the award was granted with ratable or cliff vesting.

Compensation Expense—Total share-based compensation expense recognized in income (loss)loss and the associated tax benefit for the years ended December 31 were as follows:

 

                  Millions of Dollars                                 Millions of Dollars             
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  2016   2015   2014   2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Compensation cost

    $272     362     358      $227    272    362 

Tax benefit

   92     123     125     76    92    123 

 

 

Stock Options—Stock options granted under the provisions of the Plan and prior plans permit purchase of our common stock at exercise prices equivalent to the average market price of ConocoPhillips common stock on the date the options were granted. The options have terms of 10 years and generally vest ratably, withone-third of the options awarded vesting and becoming exercisable on each anniversary date following the date of grant. Options awarded to certain employees already eligible for retirement vest within six months of the grant date, but those options do not become exercisable until the end of the normal vesting period.

The fair market values of the options granted over the past three years were measured on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used were as follows:

 

  2016 2015   2014 
  

 

 

     2017     2016     2015 
    

 

 

 

Assumptions used

                 

Risk-free interest rate

   1.55  1.79     1.86       2.24      1.55      1.79 

Dividend yield

   4.00  4.00     4.00       4.00      4.00      4.00 

Volatility factor

   26.80  23.32     25.31       28.12      26.80      23.32 

Expected life (years)

   6.37    5.79     6.12       6.39       6.37      5.79 

 

 

There were no ranges in the assumptions used to determine the fair market values of our options granted over the past three years.

Due to the separation of our Downstream businesses in 2012, expected volatility for grants of options in 2014 was based on a three-year average historical stock price volatility of a group of peer companies. We believe our historical volatility for periods prior to the 2012 separation of our Downstream businesses is no longer relevant in estimating expected volatility. For 2015 and 2016,through 2017, expected volatility was based on the weighted averageweighted-average blend of the company’s historical stock price volatility from May 1, 2012 (the date of separation of our Downstream businesses) through the stock option grant date and the average historical stock price volatility of a group of peer companies for the expected term of the options.

The following summarizes our stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2016:2017:

 

  Options  Weighted-
Average
    Exercise Price
   Weighted-
Average
   Millions of Dollars   Options  Weighted-
Average
    Exercise Price
   Weighted-
Average
   Millions of Dollars 
     Grant Date
    Fair Value
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
      Grant Date
    Fair Value
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

   20,184,810    $55.88          $42   

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   23,712,112   $52.14         $128  

Granted

   4,434,400     33.13        $5.39       2,670,200    49.76       $9.18   

Exercised

   (62,536)    48.80         (360,396)   37.24       

Forfeited

   (272,646)    34.51         (50,696)   48.55     

Expired or cancelled

   (571,916)    45.46         (1,248,417)   50.61     

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   23,712,112    $52.14          $128   

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   24,722,803   $52.18         $177  

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Vested at December 31, 2016

   20,192,822    $52.85          $93   

Vested at December 31, 2017

   23,424,010   $52.52         $162  

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2016

   15,932,144    $53.56          $55   

Exercisable at December 31, 2017

   18,074,088   $54.34         $101  

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

The weighted-average remaining contractual term of outstanding options, vested options and exercisable options at December 31, 2016,2017, was 5.745.52 years, 5.255.36 years and 4.404.50 years, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted during 2016 and 2015 was $5.39 and 2014 was $9.54, and $10.17, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during 2015was zero in 2016 and 2014 was $10 million and $89 million, respectively.in 2015.

During 2016,2017, we received $3$13 million in cash and realized a tax benefit of $4$12 million from the exercise of options. At December 31, 2016,2017, the remaining unrecognized compensation expense from unvested options was $8$5 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.911.33 years, the longest period being 2.132.12 years.

Beginning in 2018, stock option grants will be discontinued and replaced with three-year, time-vested restricted stock units which will be cash-settled.

Stock Unit ProgramProgram—Generally, restricted stock units are granted annually under the provisions of the Plan. Restricted stock units granted prior to 2013 generally vest ratably in three equal annual installments beginning on the third anniversary of the grant date. Beginning in 2013, restricted stock units granted will vest in an aggregate installment on the third anniversary of the grant date. In addition, beginning in 2012, restricted stock units granted under the Plan for a variable long-term incentive program vest ratably in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. Restricted stock units are also granted ad hoc to attract or retain key personnel, and the terms and conditions under which these restricted stock units vest vary by award. Upon vesting, the restricted stock units are settled by issuing one share of ConocoPhillips common stock per unit. Units awarded to retirement eligible employees vest six months from the grant date; however, those units are not issued as common stock until the earlier of separation from the company or the end of the regularly scheduled vesting period. Until issued as stock, most recipients of the restricted stock units receive a quarterly cash payment of a dividend equivalent that is charged to retained earnings. The grant date fair market value of these restricted stock units is deemed equal to the average ConocoPhillips stock price on the grant date. The grant date fair market value of units that do not receive a dividend equivalent while unvested is deemed equal to the average ConocoPhillips stock price on the grant date, less the net present value of the dividends that will not be received.

The following summarizes our stock unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2016:2017:

 

  

    Stock Units

  Weighted-Average       Millions of Dollars   

    Stock Units

  Weighted-Average       Millions of Dollars 
     

 

      

 

 
       Grant Date Fair Value   Total Fair Value        Grant Date Fair Value   Total Fair Value 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

   9,178,165   $        59.80    

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   8,507,504  $        48.65   

Granted

   4,613,469    32.15       3,011,903   48.77   

Forfeited

   (169,018  30.46       (372,871  45.99   

Issued

   (5,115,112    $        191     (3,319,684   $        159 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   8,507,504    $        48.65    

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   7,826,852  $        45.75   

  

 

   

  

 

   

Not Vested at December 31, 2016

   5,990,350    $        48.29    

Not Vested at December 31, 2017

   5,396,027  $        45.58   

  

 

   

  

 

   

At December 31, 2016,2017, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost from the unvested units was $105$93 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.591.67 years, the longest period being 2.822.75 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock unit awards granted during 2016 and 2015 was $32.15 and 2014 was $65.40, and $62.72, respectively. The total fair value of stock units issued during 2016 and 2015 was $191 million and 2014 was $316 million, and $256 million, respectively.

Performance Share Program—Under the Plan, we also annually grant restricted performance share units (PSUs) to senior management. These PSUs are authorized three years prior to their effective grant date (the performance period). Compensation expense is initially measured using the average fair market value of ConocoPhillips common stock and is subsequently adjusted, based on changes in the ConocoPhillips stock price through the end of each subsequent reporting period, through the grant date for stock-settled awards and the settlement date for cash-settled awards.

Stock-Settled

For performance periods beginning before 2009, PSUs do not vest until the employee becomes eligible for retirement by reaching age 55 with five years of service, and restrictions do not lapse until the employee separates from the company. With respect to awards for performance periods beginning in 2009 through 2012, PSUs do not vest until the earlier of the date the employee becomes eligible for retirement by reaching age 55 with five years of service or five years after the grant date of the award, and restrictions do not lapse until the earlier of the employee’s separation from the company or five years after the grant date (although recipients can elect to defer the lapsing of restrictions until separation). We recognize compensation expense for these awards beginning on the grant date and ending on the date the PSUs are scheduled to vest. Since these awards are authorized three years prior to the grant date, for employees eligible for retirement by or shortly after the grant date, we recognize compensation expense over the period beginning on the date of authorization and ending on the date of grant. Until issued as stock, recipients of the PSUs receive a quarterly cash payment of a dividend equivalent that is charged to retained earnings. Beginning in 2013, PSUs authorized for future grants will vest, absent employee election to defer, upon settlement following the conclusion of the three-year performance period. We recognize compensation expense over the period beginning on the date of authorization and ending on the conclusion of the performance period. PSUs are settled by issuing one share of ConocoPhillips common stock per unit.

The following summarizes our stock-settled Performance Share Program activity for the year ended December 31, 2016:2017:

 

  

 

 

 

    Stock Units

 

  

 Weighted-Average         Millions of Dollars     Stock Units  Weighted-Average        Millions of Dollars 
        Grant Date Fair Value         Total Fair Value      Grant Date Fair Value        Total Fair Value 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

   4,270,222   $        51.95    

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   3,889,524  $        51.93   

Granted

   48,065    33.13       30,953   49.76   

Issued

   (428,763    $        17     (1,167,012    $        57 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   3,889,524    $        51.93    

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   2,753,465   $        50.79   

  

 

   

  

 

   

Not Vested at December 31, 2016

   606,085    $        53.34    

Not Vested at December 31, 2017

   67,083   $        48.17   

  

 

   

  

 

   

At December 31, 2016,2017, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost from unvested stock-settled performance share awards was $3 million, which includes $1 million, related to unvested stock-settled performance share awards tied to Phillips 66 stock held by ConocoPhillips employees, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.822.00 years, the longest period being 3.983.00 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock-settled PSUs granted during 2016 and 2015 was $33.13 and 2014 was $69.25, and $65.46, respectively. The total fair value of stock-settled PSUs issued during 2016 and 2015 and 2014 was $25$17 million and $18$25 million, respectively.

Cash-Settled

In connection with and immediately following the separation of our Downstream businesses in 2012, grants of new PSUs, subject to a shortened performance period, were authorized. Once granted, these PSUs vest, absent employee election to defer, on the earlier of five years after the grant date of the award or the date the employee becomes eligible for retirement. For employees eligible for retirement by or shortly after the grant date, we recognize compensation expense over the period beginning on the date of authorization and ending on the date of grant. Otherwise, we recognize compensation expense beginning on the grant date and ending on the date the PSUs are scheduled to vest. These PSUs are settled in cash equal to the fair market value of a share of ConocoPhillips common stock per unit on the settlement date and thus are classified as liabilities on the balance sheet. Until settlement occurs, recipients of the PSUs receive a quarterly cash payment of a dividend equivalent that is charged to compensation expense.

Beginning in 2013, PSUs authorized for future grants will vest upon settlement following the conclusion of the three-year performance period. We recognize compensation expense over the period beginning on the date of authorization and ending onat the conclusion of the performance period. These PSUs will be settled in cash equal to the fair market value of a share of ConocoPhillips common stock per unit on the settlement date and are classified as liabilities on the balance sheet. During the performance period, recipients of the PSUs do not receive a quarterly cash payment of a dividend equivalent, but after the performance period ends, until settlement in cash occurs, recipients of the PSUs receive a quarterly cash payment of a dividend equivalent that is charged to compensation expense.

The following summarizes our cash-settled Performance Share Program activity for the year ended December 31, 2016:2017:

 

    Weighted-Average       Millions of Dollars   

 

 

 

Stock Units

 

 

 Weighted-Average        Millions of Dollars 
     

 

     Grant Date Fair Value        Total Fair Value 
  Stock Units Grant Date Fair Value       Total Fair Value 
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

   1,459,236  $        46.54   

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   1,274,762  $        50.39   

Granted

   684,386   33.13      456,909   49.76   

Settled

   (868,860    $      31     (517,138    $        24 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   1,274,762   $        50.39   

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   1,214,533   $        55.19   

  

 

   

  

 

   

Not Vested at December 31, 2016

   584,789   $        50.39   

Not Vested at December 31, 2017

   122,228   $        55.19   

  

 

   

  

 

   

At December 31, 2016,2017, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost from unvested cash-settled performance share awards was $7$2 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.751.64 years, the longest period being 3.132.13 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of cash-settled PSUs granted during 2016 and 2015 was $33.13 and 2014 was $46.54 and $69.23,$69.25, respectively. The total fair value of cash-settled performance share awards settled during 2016 and 2015 was $31 million and 2014 was $6 million, and zero, respectively.

From inception of the Performance Share Program through 2013, approved PSU awards were granted after the conclusion of performance periods. Beginning in February 2014, initial target PSU awards are issued near the beginning of new performance periods. These initial target PSU awards will terminate at the end of the performance periods and will be settled after the performance periods have ended. Also in 2014, initial target PSU awards were issued for open performance periods that began in prior years. For the open performance period beginning in 2012, the initial target PSU awards will terminateterminated at the end of the three-year performance period and will bewere replaced with approved PSU awards. For the open performance period beginning in 2013, the initial target PSU awards will terminateterminated at the end of the three-year performance period and will bewere settled after the performance period has ended. There is no effect on recognition of compensation expense.

Other—In addition to the above active programs, we have outstanding shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units that were either issued to replace awards held by employees of companies we acquired or issued as part of aournon-employee director compensation program for current and former members of the company’s Board of Directors or as part of an executive compensation program that has been discontinued. Generally, the recipients of the restricted shares or units receive a quarterly dividend or dividend equivalent.

The following summarizes the aggregate activity of these restricted shares and units for the year ended December 31, 2016:2017:

 

    Weighted-Average       Millions of Dollars     Weighted-Average       Millions of Dollars 
     

 

      

 

 
      Stock Units     Grant Date Fair Value       Total Fair Value       Stock Units     Grant Date Fair Value       Total Fair Value 
  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

   1,272,136  $        33.25   

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   1,317,964  $        33.16   

Granted

   99,300   40.36      87,980   48.87   

Cancelled

   (15,964  20.69      (24,486  21.37   

Issued

   (37,508    $            2    (80,418    $            4 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   1,317,964   $        33.16   

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

   1,301,040   $        32.66   

  

 

   

  

 

   

Not Vested at December 31, 2016

   -    

Not Vested at December 31, 2017

   -    

    

    

At December 31, 2016,2017, all outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units were fully vested and there was no remaining compensation cost to be recorded. The weighted-average grant date fair value of awards granted during 2016 and 2015 was $40.36 and 2014 was $58.66, and $71.23, respectively. The total fair value of awards issued during 2016 and 2015 and 2014 was $3$2 million and $3 million, respectively.

Note 19—18—Income Taxes

Income taxes charged to income (loss) from continuing operationstax benefits included in net loss were:

 

                                          
  Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   Millions of Dollars 
          2016         2015 2014   

 

 

 
  

 

 

           2017         2016 2015 
  

 

 

 

Income Taxes

        

Federal

        

Current

  $(9 (718 188    $79  (9 (718

Deferred

   (1,634 (1,443 365     (3,046 (1,634 (1,443

Foreign

        

Current

   393   745   2,846     1,729  393  745 

Deferred

   (519 (1,315 252     (510 (519 (1,315

State and local

        

Current

   (135 8   46     51  (135 8 

Deferred

   (67 (145 (114   (125 (67 (145

 

 
  $(1,971 (2,868 3,583    $(1,822 (1,971 (2,868

 

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes. Major components of deferred tax liabilities and assets at December 31 were:

 

          Millions of Dollars         
  

 

 

           Millions of Dollars         
          2016 2015   

 

 

 
  

 

 

           2017 2016 
  

 

 

 

Deferred Tax Liabilities

      

PP&E and intangibles

  $15,099   16,378    $9,692  15,099 

Investment in joint ventures

   933   866  

Investments in joint ventures

   -  933 

Inventory

   36   25     61  36 

Deferred state income tax

   203   128     178  203 

Partnership income deferral

   -   44  

Other

   486   453     464  486 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   16,757   17,894     10,395  16,757 

 

 

Deferred Tax Assets

      

Benefit plan accruals

   1,280   1,160     786  1,280 

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

   3,514   4,426     3,060  3,514 

Investments in joint ventures

   57   - 

Other financial accruals and deferrals

   317   616     166  317 

Loss and credit carryforwards

   3,522   1,579     2,310  3,522 

Other

   250   134     152  250 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   8,883   7,915     6,531  8,883 

Less: valuation allowance

   (675 (734   (1,254 (675

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   8,208   7,181     5,277  8,208 

 

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

  $8,549   10,713    $5,118  8,549 

 

 

At December 31, 2017, noncurrent assets and liabilities included deferred taxes of $164 million and $5,282 million, respectively. At December 31, 2016, noncurrent assets and liabilities includeincluded deferred taxes of $400 million and $8,949 million, respectively. At December 31, 2015, noncurrent assets and liabilities include deferred taxes of $286 million and $10,999 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2016,2017, the components of our loss and credit carryforwards before and after consideration of the applicable valuation allowances are:

 

  Millions of Dollars       Millions of Dollars     
  

 

 

     

 

 

   
  Gross Deferred
Tax Asset
   Net Deferred
Tax Asset After
Valuation Allowance
   Expiration of
Net Deferred
Tax Asset
   

Gross Deferred

Tax Asset

   

Net Deferred

Tax Asset After

Valuation Allowance

   

Expiration of

Net Deferred

Tax Asset

 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

U.S. federal net operating loss

  $1,648    $1,648     2036  

U.S. foreign tax credits

   480     296     2025-2026    $856    567    2025-2027 

U.S. general business credits

   96     96     2031     227    227    2036-2037 

State net operating losses and tax credits

   502     49     Post 2024     420    -   

Foreign net operating losses and tax credits

   796     783     Post 2025     807    786    Post 2025 

 

 
  $3,522    $2,872      $2,310    1,580   

   

   

Valuation allowances have been established to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that will, more likely than not, be realized. During 2016,2017, valuation allowances decreasedincreased a total of $59$579 million. This decreaseincrease primarily relates to the expected realization of certain deferred tax assets.assets, including foreign tax credits; U.S. tax basis associated with foreign assets; and state net operating losses and tax credits not expected to be realized. Based on our historical taxable income, expectations for the future, and availabletax-planning strategies, management expects remaining net deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance, will primarily be realized as offsets to reversing deferred tax liabilities.

At December 31, 2016,2017, unremitted income considered to be permanently reinvested in certain foreign subsidiaries and foreign corporate joint ventures totaled approximately $3,720$2,600 million. Deferred income taxes have not been provided on this amount, as we do not plan to initiate any action that would require the payment of income taxes. Due to the nature of our structures within the jurisdictions in which we operate, as well as the complex nature of the relevant tax laws, it is not practicable to estimate theThe estimated amount of additional tax if any, that mightwould be payable on this income if distributed.distributed is approximately $130 million.

The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits for 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014:2015:

 

          Millions of Dollars                   Millions of Dollars         
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
          2016 2015 2014           2017 2016 2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at January 1

  $459   442   655    $381   459   442 

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

   32   54   46     612   32   54 

Additions for tax positions of prior years

   19   4   7     109   19   4 

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

   (118 (37 (228   (129  (118  (37

Settlements

   (9 (4 (28   (5  (9  (4

Lapse of statute

   (2  -   (10   (86  (2  - 

 

 

Balance at December 31

  $381   459   442    $882   381   459 

 

 

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits for 2017, 2016 and 2015 and 2014 were $882 million, $359 million $354 million and $348$354 million, respectively, which, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate. The balance of unrecognized tax benefits increased in 2017 mainly due to the recognition of a U.S. worthless securities deduction that we do not believe will generate a cash tax benefit.

At December 31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014,2015, accrued liabilities for interest and penalties totaled $54 million, $79$54 million and $65$79 million, respectively, net of accrued income taxes. Interest and penalties resulted in no impact to earnings in 2017, a benefit to earnings of $18 million in 2016, and a reduction to earnings of $11 million in 2015, and a benefit to earnings of $43 million in 2014.2015.

We and our subsidiaries file tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in many foreign and state jurisdictions. Audits in major jurisdictions are generally complete as follows: United Kingdom (2014), Canada (2009), United States (2010) and Norway (2015)(2016). Issues in dispute for audited years and audits for subsequent years are ongoing and in various stages of completion in the many jurisdictions in which we operate around the world.

As a consequence, the balance in unrecognized tax benefits can be expected to fluctuate from period to period. It is reasonably possible such changes could be significant when compared with our total unrecognized tax benefits, but the amount of change is not estimable.

The amounts of U.S. and foreign income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, with a reconciliation of tax at the federal statutory rate with the provision for income taxes, were:

 

          Millions of Dollars         

Percent of

        Pre-Tax Income (Loss)         

           Millions of Dollars         

Percent of

        Pre-Tax Income (Loss)         

 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 
          2016 2015 2014         2016 2015 2014           2017 2016 2015         2017 2016 2015 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes from continuing operations

       

Loss before income taxes

       

United States

  $(4,410 (4,150 2,310    79.7 57.3   24.6    $(5,250 (4,410 (4,150  200.8 79.7  57.3 

Foreign

   (1,120 (3,089 7,080    20.3   42.7   75.4     2,635  (1,120 (3,089  (100.8 20.3  42.7 

 

 
  $(5,530 (7,239 9,390    100.0 100.0   100.0    $(2,615 (5,530 (7,239  100.0 100.0  100.0 

 

 

Federal statutory income tax

  $(1,936 (2,534 3,287    35.0 35.0   35.0    $(915 (1,936 (2,534  35.0 35.0  35.0 

Non-U.S. effective tax rates

   365   381   376    (6.6 (5.3 4.0     625  361  301   (23.9 (6.5 (4.2

Foreign tax law change

   (161 (426  -    2.9   5.9    -  

Impact of U.S. tax legislation

   (852  -   -   32.6   -   - 

Canada disposition

   (1,277  -   -   48.8   -   - 

Recovery of outside basis

   (962 (60 (491  36.8  1.1  6.8 

Adjustment to tax reserves

   881  55  42   (33.7 (1.0 (0.6

APLNG impairment

   834   -  525   (31.9  -  (7.3

State income tax

   (84 (122 (85  3.2  2.2  1.2 

Enhanced oil recovery credit

   (68 (62  -   2.6  1.1   - 

U.K. rate change

   -  (161 (555  -  2.9  7.7 

Canada rate change

   -   -  129   -   -  (1.8

U.S. fair value election

   -   (185  -    -   2.6    -     -   -  (185  -   -  2.6 

Enhanced Oil Recovery Credit

   (62  -    -    1.1    -    -  

State income tax

   (131 (89 (44  2.4   1.2   (0.5

Other

   (46 (15 (36  0.8   0.2   (0.4   (4 (46 (15  0.2  0.8  0.2 

 

 
  $(1,971 (2,868 3,583    35.6 39.6   38.1    $(1,822 (1,971 (2,868  69.7 35.6  39.6 

 

 

The increase in the effective tax rate for 2017 was primarily due to the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Legislation) and the impact of the Canada disposition, partially offset by the impact of the APLNG impairment and our mix of income among taxing jurisdictions.

The Tax Legislation, enacted on December 22, 2017, reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, requires companies to pay aone-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred and creates new taxes on certain foreign-sourced earnings. At December 31, 2017, we have not completed our accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Tax Legislation; however, as described below, we have made a reasonable estimate of the effects on our existing deferred tax balances and theone-time transition tax and recorded a provisional tax benefit of $852 million.

Provisional Amount—Deferred tax assets and liabilities

In the fourth quarter of 2017, we remeasured certain U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21 percent. However, we are still analyzing certain aspects of the Tax Legislation and refining our calculations, which could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts. The provisional amount recorded related to the remeasurement of our U.S. deferred tax balance was a tax benefit of $908 million.

Provisional Amount—Foreign tax effects

Theone-time transition tax is based on our total post-1986 earnings and profits which we have previously deferred from U.S. income taxes. We reasonably estimate that we will not incur aone-time transition tax. This assumption may change when we finalize the calculation of post-1986 foreign earnings and profits, previously deferred from U.S. federal taxation, and finalize the amounts held in cash or other specified assets. As a result of the Tax Legislation, we have removed the indefinite reinvestment assertion on one of our foreign subsidiaries and recorded a tax expense of $56 million in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Our effective tax rate in 2017 was favorably impacted by a tax benefit of $1,277 million related to the Canada disposition. This tax benefit was primarily associated with a deferred tax recovery related to the Canadian capital gains exclusion component of the 2017 Canada disposition and the recognition of previously unrealizable Canadian capital asset tax basis. The Canada disposition, along with the associated restructuring of our Canadian operations, may generate an additional tax benefit of $822 million. However, since we believe it is not likely we will receive a corresponding cash tax savings, this $822 million benefit has been offset by a full tax reserve. See Note 4—Assets Held for Sale, Sold or Acquired for additional information on our Canada disposition.

The impairment of our APLNG investment in the second quarter of 2017 did not generate a tax benefit. See the “APLNG” section of Note 5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for information on the impairment of our APLNG investment.

The decrease in the effective tax rate for 2016 was primarily due to higherour mix of income in high taxamong taxing jurisdictions, lower losses in low tax jurisdictions, and reduced net tax benefit from the tax law changes.

The increase inchanges discussed below, and the effectiveabsence of a tax rate for 2015 was primarily due to the U.K. tax law change andbenefit associated with electing the fair market value method of apportioning interest expense for prior years, discussed below; partially offset by lower income in high tax jurisdictions and the Canadian tax law change, discussed below.years.

In the United Kingdom, legislation was enacted on September 15, 2016, to decrease the overall U.K. upstream corporation tax rate from 50 percent to 40 percent effective January 1, 2016. As a result, we recorded a $161 million net tax benefit for revaluingrelated to the remeasurement of our U.K. deferred tax liability is reflectedbalance in the “Income tax provision (benefit)” line on our consolidated income statement.2016.

In the United Kingdom, legislation was enacted on March 26, 2015, to decrease the overall U.K. upstream corporation tax rate from 62 percent to 50 percent effective January 1, 2015. As a result, we recorded a $555 million net tax benefit for revaluingrelated to the remeasurement of our U.K. deferred tax liability is reflectedbalance in the “Income tax provision (benefit)” line on our consolidated income statement.2015.

In Canada, legislation was enacted on June 29, 2015, to increase the overall Canadian corporation tax rate from 25 percent to 27 percent effective July 1, 2015. As a result, we recorded a $129 million net tax expense for revaluingrelated to the remeasurement of our Canadian deferred tax liability is reflectedbalance in the “Income tax provision (benefit)” line on our consolidated income statement.2015.

In December 2015, we filed refund claims for prior years electing the fair market value method of apportioning interest in the United States. As a result, we recorded a $185 million tax benefit was recordedassociated with these refund claims in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Certain operating losses in jurisdictions outside of the U.S. only yield a tax benefit in the U.S. as a worthless security deduction. For 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015 the amount of the tax benefit was $962 million, $60 million and $491 million, and $122 million, respectively.

Note 20—19—Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeLoss

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss in the equity section of the balance sheet included:

 

  Millions of Dollars  Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Defined
    Benefit Plans
   Foreign
Currency
Translation
   Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  

Defined

    Benefit Plans

 

Net

Unrealized

Loss on

Securities

 

Foreign

Currency

Translation

 

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

Loss

 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

  $(824)     2,826     2,002  

Other comprehensive loss

   (437)     (3,467)     (3,904)  

 

December 31, 2014

   (1,261)     (641)     (1,902)   $(1,261)   -  (641)  (1,902) 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   818     (5,163)     (4,345)   818   -  (5,163)  (4,345) 

 

 

December 31, 2015

   (443)     (5,804)     (6,247)   (443)   -  (5,804)  (6,247) 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   (104)     158     54   (104)   -  158  54 

 

 

December 31, 2016

  $(547)     (5,646)     (6,193)   (547)   -  (5,646)  (6,193) 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  147   (58)   586   675 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 $(400)  (58)  (5,060)  (5,518) 

 

There were no items within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)loss related to noncontrolling interests.

The following table summarizes reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss during the years ended December 31:

 

          Millions of Dollars                   Millions of Dollars         
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  2016   2015   2017   2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Defined Benefit Plans

  $179     251    $135    179 

 

 
Above amounts are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost and are presented net of tax expense of:  $95     133    $74    95 

See Note 18—17—Employee Benefit Plans, for additional information.

Note 21—20—Cash Flow Information

Amounts included in continuing operations for the years ended December 31 were:

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
          2016 2015   2014   2017 2016 2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Noncash Investing and Financing Activities

     

Increase (decrease) in PP&E related to an increase (decrease) in asset retirement obligations*

  $(1,017 402     1,611  

Noncash Investing Activities

    

Increase (decrease) in PP&E related to an increase (decrease) in asset retirement obligations

  $(37 (1,017 402 

 

 

Cash Payments (Receipts)

         

Interest

  $1,151   920     669    $1,163  1,151  920 

Income taxes**

   (318 523     4,203  

Income taxes

   1,168  (318)*  523

 

 

Net Sales (Purchases) of Short-Term Investments

         

Short-term investments purchased

  $(1,753  -     (876  $(6,617 (1,753  - 

Short-term investments sold

   1,702    -     1,129     4,827  1,702   - 

 

 
  $(51  -     253    $(1,790 (51  - 

 

 

*Includes $68 million in 2014, primarily related to the impact of U.K. tax law changes on the deductibility of decommissioning costs.

**Net of $585 million and $642 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to refunds received from the Internal Revenue Service.

Note 22—21—Other Financial Information

Amounts included in continuing operations for the years ended December 31 were:

           Millions of Dollars         
  

 

 

 
           2017          2016          2015 
  

 

 

 

Interest and Debt Expense

    

Incurred

    

Debt

  $1,114   1,279   1,130 

Other

   103   123   84 

 

 
   1,217   1,402   1,214 

Capitalized

   (119  (157  (294

 

 

Expensed

  $1,098   1,245   920 

 

 

Other Income

    

Interest income

  $112   57   45 

Other, net

   417   198   80 

 

 
  $529   255   125 

 

 

Research and Development Expenditures—expensed

  $100   116   222 

 

 

Shipping and Handling Costs*

  $1,058   1,139   1,181 

 

 
*Amounts included in production and operating expenses. 

Foreign Currency Transaction (Gains) Losses—after-tax

    

Alaska

  $-   -   - 

Lower 48

   -   -   - 

Canada

   3   1   - 

Europe and North Africa

   7   (7  (22

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   23   (9  (78

Other International

   1   7   (9

Corporate and Other

   (3  (18  45 

 

 
  $31   (26  (64

 

 

 

           Millions of Dollars         
  

 

 

 
           2016           2015           2014 
  

 

 

 

Interest and Debt Expense

      

Incurred

      

Debt

  $1,279     1,130     1,063  

Other

   123     84     73  

 

 
   1,402     1,214     1,136  

Capitalized

   (157)     (294)     (488)  

 

 

Expensed

  $1,245     920     648  

 

 

Other Income

      

Interest income

  $57     45     83  

Other, net

   198     80     283  

 

 
  $255     125     366  

 

 

Research and Development Expenditures—expensed

  $116     222     263  

 

 

Shipping and Handling Costs*

  $1,139     1,181     1,360  

 

 
*Amounts included in production and operating expenses.      

Foreign Currency Transaction (Gains) Losses—after-tax

      

Alaska

  $-     -     -  

Lower 48

   -     -     -  

Canada

   1     -     (4)  

Europe and North Africa

   (7)     (22)     (56)  

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   (9)     (78)     -  

Other International

   7     (9)     -  

Corporate and Other

   (18)     45     16  

 

 
  $(26)     (64)     (44)  

 

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
          2016   2015           2017 2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Properties, Plants and Equipment

       

Proved properties

  $119,970     122,796    $102,044  119,970 

Unproved properties

   5,150     7,410     4,491  5,150 

Other

   6,286     6,653     3,896  6,286 

 

 

Gross properties, plants and equipment

   131,406     136,859     110,431  131,406 

Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   (73,075)     (70,413)     (64,748 (73,075

 

 

Net properties, plants and equipment

  $58,331     66,446    $45,683  58,331 

 

 

Note 23—22—Related Party Transactions

Our related parties primarily include equity method investments and certain trusts for the benefit of employees.

Significant transactions with our equity affiliates were:

 

              Millions of Dollars             
              Millions of Dollars                

 

 

 
   2016   2015   2014            2017 2016 2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating revenues and other income

  $133   118   119    $107  133  118 

Purchases

   101   97   190     99  101  97 

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses

   63   62   70     59  63  62 

Net interest (income) expense*

   (12 (9 (44   (13 (12 (9

 

 

*We paid interest to, or received interest from, various affiliates. See Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for additional information on loans to affiliated companies.

The table above includes transactions with Freeport LNGthe FCCL Partnership through the date of the termination agreement and excludes the termination fee.sale. See Note 7—5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for additional information.

Note 24—23—Segment Disclosures and Related Information

We explore for, produce, transport and market crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids on a worldwide basis. We manage our operations through six operating segments, which are primarily defined by geographic region: Alaska, Lower 48, Canada, Europe and North Africa, Asia Pacific and Middle East, and Other International.

After agreeing to sell our Nigeria business in 2012, we completed the sale in 2014. Results for these operations have been reported as discontinued operations in the applicable periods presented. For additional information, see Note 3—Discontinued Operations.

Corporate and Other represents costs not directly associated with an operating segment, such as most interest expense, premiums on early retirement of debt, corporate overhead and certain technology activities, including licensing revenues. Corporate assets include all cash and cash equivalents.equivalents and short-term investments.

We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on net income (loss) attributable to ConocoPhillips. Segment accounting policies are the same as those in Note 1—Accounting Policies. Intersegment sales are at prices that approximate market.

Analysis of Results by Operating Segment

 

           Millions of Dollars                     Millions of Dollars         
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016   2015   2014      2017    2016    2015  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sales and Other Operating Revenues

          

Alaska

  $3,681   4,351   8,382     $4,224    3,681    4,351  

 

 

Lower 48

   10,719   11,976   21,721      12,968    10,719    11,976  

Intersegment eliminations

   (17 (63 (107)     (4)    (17)    (63) 

 

 

Lower 48

   10,702   11,913   21,614      12,964    10,702    11,913  

 

 

Canada

   2,192   2,454   5,162      3,178    2,192    2,454  

Intersegment eliminations

   (218 (318 (753)     (559)    (218)    (318) 

 

 

Canada

   1,974   2,136   4,409      2,619    1,974    2,136  

 

 

Europe and North Africa

   3,462   6,110   10,665      5,181    3,462    6,110  

Intersegment eliminations

   -   (4 (49)     -    -    (4) 

 

 

Europe and North Africa

   3,462   6,106   10,616      5,181    3,462    6,106  

 

 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   3,705   4,746   7,425      4,014    3,705    4,746  

Intersegment eliminations

   -   (1 (1)     -    -    (1) 

 

 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   3,705   4,745   7,424      4,014    3,705    4,745  

 

 

Other International

   -   1         -    -     

Corporate and Other

   169   312   79      104    169    312  

 

 

Consolidated sales and other operating revenues

  $23,693   29,564   52,524     $29,106    23,693    29,564  

 

 

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Impairments

          

Alaska

  $868   690   584     $1,026    868    690  

Lower 48

   4,358   4,227   3,911      6,693    4,358    4,227  

Canada

   975   788   962      461    975    788  

Europe and North Africa

   1,253   2,565   2,345      1,313    1,253    2,565  

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   1,606   2,981   1,275      3,819    1,606    2,981  

Other International

   1    -        -    1     

Corporate and Other

   140   107   107      134    140    107  

 

 

Consolidated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments

  $9,201   11,358   9,185     $13,446    9,201    11,358  

 

 

In 2017, sales by our Lower 48, Alaska and Canada segments to a certain refining company accounted for approximately $3 billion or 11 percent of our total consolidated sales and other operating revenues.

   Millions of Dollars         Millions of Dollars     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
           2016   2015   2014             2017  2016  2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates

        

Alaska

  $9   4   9    $7  9  4 

Lower 48

   (6 (5 1     5  (6 (5

Canada

   89   78   1,385     197  89  78 

Europe and North Africa

   22   23   37     10  22  23 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   (51 550   1,089     553  (51 550 

Other International

   -   8   9     -   -  8 

Corporate and Other

   (11 (3 (1   -  (11 (3

 

 

Consolidated equity in earnings of affiliates

  $52   655   2,529    $772  52  655 

 

 

Income Taxes

        

Alaska

  $(59 (71 1,081    $(689 (59 (71

Lower 48

   (1,328 (1,119 (92   (2,453 (1,328 (1,119

Canada

   (383 (223 236     (616 (383 (223

Europe and North Africa

   (46 (854 1,590     1,165  (46 (854

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   306   467   1,194     351  306  467 

Other International

   (40 (456 (102   21  (40 (456

Corporate and Other

   (421 (612 (324   399  (421 (612

 

 

Consolidated income taxes

  $(1,971 (2,868 3,583    $(1,822 (1,971 (2,868

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

        

Alaska

  $319   4   2,041    $1,466  319  4 

Lower 48

   (2,257 (1,932 (22   (2,371 (2,257 (1,932

Canada

   (935 (1,044 940     2,564  (935 (1,044

Europe and North Africa

   394   409   814     553  394  409 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   209   (463 2,939     (1,098 209  (463

Other International

   (16 (593 (100   167  (16 (593

Corporate and Other

   (1,329 (809 (874   (2,136 (1,329 (809

Discontinued operations

   -    -   1,131  

 

 

Consolidated net income (loss) attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(3,615 (4,428 6,869  

Consolidated net loss attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(855 (3,615 (4,428

 

 

Investments In and Advances To Affiliates

        

Alaska

  $58   61   53    $56  58  61 

Lower 48

   426   455   471     402  426  455 

Canada

   8,784   8,165   9,484     -  8,784  8,165 

Europe and North Africa

   62   70   126     55  62  70 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   11,611   11,780   14,022     9,077  11,611  11,780 

Other International

   -    -   59     -   -   - 

Corporate and Other

   4   15   15     -  4  15 

 

 

Consolidated investments in and advances to affiliates

  $20,945   20,546   24,230    $9,590  20,945  20,546 

 

 

   Millions of Dollars    Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2014    2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

            

Alaska

  $12,314     12,555     12,655    $12,108    12,314    12,555 

Lower 48

   22,673     26,932     30,185     14,632    22,673    26,932 

Canada

   17,548     17,221     21,764     6,214    17,548    17,221 

Europe and North Africa

   11,727     13,703     16,970     11,870    11,727    13,703 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   20,451     22,318     25,976     16,985    20,451    22,318 

Other International

   97     282     1,116     97    97    282 

Corporate and Other

   4,962     4,473     7,815     11,456    4,962    4,473 

Discontinued operations

   -     -     58  

 

 

Consolidated total assets

  $89,772     97,484     116,539    $73,362    89,772    97,484 

 

 

Capital Expenditures and Investments

            

Alaska

  $883     1,352     1,564    $815    883    1,352 

Lower 48

   1,262     3,765     6,054     2,136    1,262    3,765 

Canada

   698     1,255     2,340     202    698    1,255 

Europe and North Africa

   1,020     1,573     2,540     872    1,020    1,573 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   838     1,812     3,877     482    838    1,812 

Other International

   104     173     520     21    104    173 

Corporate and Other

   64     120     190     63    64    120 

 

 

Consolidated capital expenditures and investments

  $4,869     10,050     17,085    $4,591    4,869    10,050 

 

 

Interest Income and Expense

            

Interest income

            

Corporate

  $47     36     40    $101    47    36 

Lower 48

   -     -     35     -    -    - 

Europe and North Africa

   2     2     2     2    2    2 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

   8     6     6     9    8    6 

Other International

   -     1     -     -    -    1 

 

 

Interest and debt expense

            

Corporate

  $1,245     920     648    $1,098    1,245    920 

 

 

Sales and Other Operating Revenues by Product

            

Crude oil

  $10,801     12,830     23,784    $13,260    10,801    12,830 

Natural gas

   9,401     11,888     20,717     10,773    9,401    11,888 

Natural gas liquids

   837     952     2,245     1,102    837    952 

Other*

   2,654     3,894     5,778     3,971    2,654    3,894 

 

 

Consolidated sales and other operating revenues by product

  $    23,693     29,564     52,524    $    29,106    23,693    29,564 

 

 
*Includes LNG and bitumen.      

*Includes LNG and bitumen.

Geographic Information

 

  

       Millions of Dollars  
  

 

 

 
   Sales and Other Operating Revenues(1)           Long-Lived Assets(2)      
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2016     2015     2014       2016     2015     2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

United States

  $14,400     16,284     30,019       32,949     37,445     39,641  

Australia(3)

   1,353     2,127     3,258       12,259     12,788     14,969  

Canada

   1,974     2,136     4,409       16,846     16,766     20,874  

China

   551     782     1,701       1,372     1,647     1,913  

Indonesia

   938     1,165     1,963       856     1,191     1,526  

Malaysia

   735     598     403       3,323     3,599     3,811  

Norway

   1,645     2,107     3,794       6,228     6,933     8,142  

United Kingdom

   1,816     4,005     6,594       3,209     4,154     5,327  

Other foreign countries

   281     360     383       2,234     2,469     3,471  

 

 

Worldwide consolidated

  $23,693     29,564     52,524           79,276     86,992     99,674  

 

 

Geographic Information

       Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   Sales and Other Operating Revenues(1)          Long-Lived Assets(2)     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2017   2016   2015       2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

United States

  $17,204    14,400    16,284      23,623    32,949    37,445 

Australia(3)

   1,448    1,353    2,127      9,657    12,259    12,788 

Canada

   2,619    1,974    2,136      5,613    16,846    16,766 

China

   712    551    782      1,275    1,372    1,647 

Indonesia

   757    938    1,165      758    856    1,191 

Malaysia

   1,103    735    598      2,736    3,323    3,599 

Norway

   2,348    1,645    2,107      6,154    6,228    6,933 

United Kingdom

   2,248    1,816    4,005      3,335    3,209    4,154 

Other foreign countries

   667    281    360      2,122    2,234    2,469 

 

 

Worldwide consolidated

  $29,106    23,693    29,564          55,273    79,276    86,992 

 

 

(1)Sales and other operating revenues are attributable to countries based on the location of the selling operation.

(2)Defined as net PP&E plus investments in and advances to affiliated companies.

(3)Includes amounts related to the joint petroleum development area with shared ownership held by Australia and Timor-Leste.

Note 25—24—New Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU Accounting Standards Update (ASU)No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASUNo. 2014-09), which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in FASB ASC Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. This ASU sets forth a five-step model for determining when and how revenue is recognized. Under the model, an entity will be required to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. Additional disclosures will be required to describe the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date,” which defers the effective date of ASUNo. 2014-09. The ASU is now effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Entities may choose to adopt the standard using either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach.

ASUNo. 2014-09 was amended in March 2016 by the provisions of ASUNo. 2016-08, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” in April 2016 by the provisions of ASUNo. 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” in May 2016 by the provisions of ASUNo. 2016-12, “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” and in December 2016 by the provisions of ASUNo. 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue From Contracts With Customers.”

We will adopt the provisions of ASUNo. 2014-09, as amended, with effect from January 1, 2018, and have elected not to early adopt the standard. We intend towill adopt the new standard using the modified retrospective approach which we will apply only to contracts within the scope of the standard that are not complete at the date of initial application. Under this approach, we will apply the guidance retrospectively only to the most current period presented in the financial statements. Overall, theThe impact to our financial statements is expectedimmaterial but will include a cumulative effect reduction of $220 million to retained earnings from initially applying the new revenue standard relating to licensing revenues previously recognized. Under the new revenue standard licensing revenue will be immaterial.recognized when the customer can utilize and benefit from their right to use the license.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (ASUNo. 2016-01), to meet its objective of providing more decision-useful information about financial instruments. The ASU, among other things, requires entities to record the changes in fair value of equity investments, other than investments accounted for using the equity method, within net income. Under this ASU, entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses onavailable-for-sale securities in other comprehensive income. The ASU also requires additional disclosures relating to fair value measurement categories for financial assets and liabilities and eliminates certain disclosure requirements related to financial instruments measured at amortized cost. ASUNo. 2016-01 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and the ASU should be adopted using a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date of adoption.

Upon adoption of the standard, we will make a cumulative-effect adjustment to reclassify the accumulated unrealized holding gains and losses of $58 million related to our investment in Cenovus Energy from other comprehensive income to retained earnings. From January 1, 2018, we will begin reporting the changes in the fair value of our investment within net income. For additional information on our investment in Cenovus Energy, see Note 6—Investment in Cenovus Energy, Note 14—Fair Value Measurement, and Note 19 —Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-02, “Leases” (ASUNo. 2016-02), which establishes comprehensive accounting and financial reporting requirements for leasing arrangements. This ASU supersedes the existing requirements in FASB ASC Topic 840, “Leases,” and requires lessees to recognize substantially all lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. The provisions of ASUNo. 2016-02 also modify the definition of a lease and outline requirements for recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leasing arrangements by both lessees and lessors. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption of the standard is permitted. Entities are required to adopt the ASU using a modified retrospective approach, subject to certain optional practical expedients, and apply the provisions of ASUNo. 2016-02 to leasing arrangements existing at or entered into after the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. While weIn January 2018, ASUNo. 2016-02 was amended by the provisions of ASUNo. 2018-01, “Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842.” We plan to adopt ASUNo. 2016-02, as amended, effective January 1, 2019, and continue to evaluate the ASU to determine the impact of adoption on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures, accounting policies and systems, business processes, and internal controls. We also continue to monitor proposals issued by the FASB to clarify the ASU and certain industry implementation issues. While our evaluation of ASUNo. 2016-02 and related implementation activities are ongoing, we expect the adoption of the ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASUNo. 2016-13), which sets forth the current expected credit loss model, a new forward-looking impairment model for certain financial instruments based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption of the standard is permitted. Entities are required to adopt ASUNo. 2016-13 using a modified retrospective approach, subject to certain limited exceptions. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.

 

Oil and Gas Operations(Unaudited)

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, “Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas,” and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we are making certain supplemental disclosures about our oil and gas exploration and production operations.

These disclosures include information about our consolidated oil and gas activities and our proportionate share of our equity affiliates’ oil and gas activities in our operating segments. As a result, amounts reported as equity affiliates in Oil and Gas Operations may differ from those shown in the individual segment disclosures reported elsewhere in this report.

As required by current authoritative guidelines, the estimated future date when an asset will be permanently shut down for economic reasons is based on historical12-monthfirst-of-month average prices and current costs. This estimated date when production will end affects the amount of estimated reserves. Therefore, as prices and cost levels change from year to year, the estimate of proved reserves also changes. Generally, our proved reserves decrease as prices decline and increase as prices rise.

Our proved reserves include estimated quantities related to production sharing contracts (PSCs), which are reported under the “economic interest” method, as well as variable-royalty regimes, and are subject to fluctuations in commodity prices, recoverable operating expenses and capital costs. If costs remain stable, reserve quantities attributable to recovery of costs will change inversely to changes in commodity prices. For example, if prices increase, then our applicable reserve quantities would decline. At December 31, 2016,2017, approximately 78 percent of our total proved reserves were under PSCs, located in our Asia Pacific/Middle East geographic reporting area, and 235 percent of our total proved reserves were under a variable-royalty regime, located in our Canada geographic reporting area.

Our reserves disclosures by geographic area include the United States, Canada, Europe (Norway and the United Kingdom), Asia Pacific/Middle East, Africa and Other Areas. Other Areas primarily consists of Russia, which we exited in 2015.

As part of our asset disposition program, we sold our interest in the Nigeria business in July 2014. This business was considered held for sale since the fourth quarter of 2012 and has been reported as discontinued operations for the applicable periods presented. Accordingly, the Results of Operations, Average Sales Prices and Net Production tables included within the supplemental oil and gas disclosures reflect the associated earnings and production as discontinued operations. See Note 3—Discontinued Operations, for additional information.

Reserves Governance

The recording and reporting of proved reserves are governed by criteria established by regulations of the SEC and FASB. Proved reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

Proved reserves are further classified as either developed or undeveloped. Proved developed reserves are proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods, or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared with the cost of a new well, and through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well. Proved undeveloped reserves are proved reserves expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

We have a companywide, comprehensive,SEC-compliant internal policy that governs the determination and reporting of proved reserves. This policy is applied by the geologistsgeoscientists and reservoir engineers in our

business units around the world. As part of our internal control process, each business unit’s reserves processes and controls are reviewed annually by an internal team which is headed by the company’s Manager of Reserves Compliance and Reporting. This team, composed of internal reservoir engineers, geologists,geoscientists, finance personnel and a senior representative from DeGolyer and MacNaughton (D&M), a third-party petroleum engineering consulting firm, reviews the business units’ reserves for adherence to SEC guidelines and company policy throughon-site visits, teleconferences and review of documentation. In addition to providing independent reviews, this internal team also ensures reserves are calculated using consistent and appropriate standards and procedures. This team is independent of business unit line management and is responsible for reporting its findings to senior management. The team is responsible for communicating our reserves policy and procedures and is available for internal peer reviews and consultation on major projects or technical issues throughout the year. All of our proved reserves held by consolidated companies and our share of equity affiliates have been estimated by ConocoPhillips.

During 2016,2017, our processes and controls used to assess over 90 percent of proved reserves as of December 31, 2016,2017, were reviewed by D&M. The purpose of their review was to assess whether the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal processes and controls used to determine estimates of proved reserves are in accordance with SEC regulations. In such review, ConocoPhillips’ technical staff presented D&M with an overview of the reserves data, as well as the methods and assumptions used in estimating reserves. The data presented included pertinent seismic information, geologic maps, well logs, production tests, material balance calculations, reservoir simulation models, well performance data, operating procedures and relevant economic criteria. Management’s intent in retaining D&M to review its processes and controls was to provide objective third-party input on these processes and controls. D&M’s opinion was the general processes and controls employed by ConocoPhillips in estimating its December 31, 2016,2017, proved reserves for the properties reviewed are in accordance with the SEC reserves definitions. D&M’s report is included as Exhibit 99 of this Annual Report on Form10-K.

The technical person primarily responsible for overseeing the processes and internal controls used in the preparation of the company’s reserves estimates is the Manager of Reserves Compliance and Reporting. This individual holds a master’s degree in petroleum engineering. He is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers with over 25 years of oil and gas industry experience and has held positions of increasing responsibility in reservoir engineering, subsurface and asset management in the United States and several international field locations.

Engineering estimates of the quantities of proved reserves are inherently imprecise. See the “Critical Accounting Estimates” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional discussion of the sensitivities surrounding these estimates.

Proved Reserves

 

Years Ended

   Crude Oil    Crude Oil 

December 31

   Millions of Barrels    Millions of Barrels 
   Alaska    
 
Lower
48
  
  
  
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
 Canada   Europe    
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
 Africa    
 
Other
Areas
  
  
 Total     Alaska   
Lower
48
 
 
  
Total
U.S.
 
 
 Canada  Europe   
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
 Africa   
Other
Areas
 
 
 Total 
  

 

 

 

Developed and Undeveloped

                    

Consolidated operations

                    

End of 2013

   1,106   606   1,712   22   456   232   237    -   2,659  

Revisions

   (6 25   19   3   (1 5    -    -   26  

Improved recovery

   8    -   8   2    -   3    -    -   13  

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -  

Extensions and discoveries

   16   116   132   2    -   16    -    -   150  

Production

   (61 (71 (132 (5 (44 (29 (5  -   (215

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -   (28  -   (28
     

End of 2014

   1,063   676   1,739   24   411   227   204    -   2,605     1,063  676  1,739  24  411  227  204   -  2,605 

Revisions

   (115 (69 (184  -   (21 (29  -    -   (234   (115 (69 (184  -  (21 (29  -   -  (234

Improved recovery

   4   4   8   1    -   31    -    -   40     4  4  8  1   -  31   -   -  40 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   20   57   77   1    -   7    -    -   85     20  57  77  1   -  7   -   -  85 

Production

   (57 (78 (135 (4 (44 (33  -    -   (216   (57 (78 (135 (4 (44 (33  -   -  (216

Sales

   -   (2 (2 (8  -    -    -    -   (10   -  (2 (2 (8  -   -   -   -  (10
     

 

End of 2015

   915   588   1,503   14   346   203   204    -   2,270     915  588  1,503  14  346  203  204   -  2,270 

Revisions

   (57 (93 (150 3    -   6    -    -   (141   (57 (93 (150 3   -  6   -   -  (141

Improved recovery

   6   3   9    -    -   7    -    -   16     6  3  9   -   -  7   -   -  16 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   33   79   112    -    -   7    -    -   119     33  79  112   -   -  7   -   -  119 

Production

   (60 (71 (131 (3 (43 (35 (1  -   (213   (60 (71 (131 (3 (43 (35 (1  -  (213

Sales

   -    -    -   (1  -   (3  -    -   (4   -   -   -  (1  -  (3  -   -  (4
     

 

End of 2016

   837   506   1,343   13   303   185   203    -   2,047     837  506  1,343  13  303  185  203   -  2,047 
     

Equity affiliates

          

End of 2013

   -    -    -    -    -   86    -   4   90  

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -   17    -   3   20     113  65  178  1  38  32   -   -  249 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     6   -  6   -   -   -   -   -  6 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     41  210  251   -   -  2   -   -  253 

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (5  -   (2 (7   (60 (64 (124 (1 (45 (34 (7  -  (211

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -  (10 (10 (12  -   -   -   -  (22
     

 

End of 2017

   937  707  1,644  1  296  185  196   -  2,322 

 

Equity affiliates

          

End of 2014

   -    -    -    -    -   98    -   5   103     -   -   -   -   -  98   -  5  103 

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (5  -   (1 (6   -   -   -   -   -  (5  -  (1 (6

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -   (4 (4   -   -   -   -   -   -   -  (4 (4
     

 

End of 2015

   -    -    -    -    -   93    -    -   93     -   -   -   -   -  93   -   -  93 

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (5  -    -   (5   -   -   -   -   -  (5  -   -  (5

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
     

 

End of 2016

   -    -    -    -    -   88    -    -   88     -   -   -   -   -  88   -   -  88 

Revisions

   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Improved recovery

   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Production

   -   -   -   -   -  (5  -   -  (5

Sales

   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

 

End of 2017

   -   -   -   -   -  83   -   -  83 
     

 

Total company

                    

End of 2013

   1,106   606   1,712   22   456   318   237   4   2,749  

End of 2014

   1,063   676   1,739   24   411   325   204   5   2,708     1,063  676  1,739  24  411  325  204  5  2,708 

End of 2015

   915   588   1,503   14   346   296   204    -   2,363     915  588  1,503  14  346  296  204   -  2,363 

End of 2016

   837   506   1,343   13   303   273   203    -   2,135     837  506  1,343  13  303  273  203   -  2,135 

End of 2017

   937  707  1,644  1  296  268  196   -  2,405 
     

 

Years Ended

   Crude Oil    Crude Oil 

December 31

   Millions of Barrels    Millions of Barrels 
   Alaska     
 
Lower
48
  
  
   
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
   Canada     Europe     
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
   Africa     
 
Other
Areas
  
  
   Total     Alaska    
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
   Africa    
Other
Areas
 
 
   Total 
  

 

 

 

Developed

                                    

Consolidated operations

                                    

End of 2013

   1,003     268     1,271     22     247     126     230     -     1,896  

End of 2014

   950     313     1,263     23     237     142     199     -     1,864     950    313    1,263    23    237    142    199    -    1,864 

End of 2015

   819     283     1,102     13     200     139     204     -     1,658     819    283    1,102    13    200    139    204    -    1,658 

End of 2016

   747     256     1,003     13     184     106     203     -     1,509     747    256    1,003    13    184    106    203    -    1,509 

End of 2017

   828    315    1,143    1    190    121    196    -    1,651 
     

 

Equity affiliates

                                    

End of 2013

   -     -     -     -     -     86     -     4     90  

End of 2014

   -     -     -     -     -     98     -     5     103     -    -    -    -    -    98    -    5    103 

End of 2015

   -     -     -     -     -     93     -     -     93     -    -    -    -    -    93    -    -    93 

End of 2016

   -     -     -     -     -     88     -     -     88     -    -    -    -    -    88    -    -    88 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    83    -    -    83 
     

 

Undeveloped

                                    

Consolidated operations

                                    

End of 2013

   103     338     441     -     209     106     7     -     763  

End of 2014

   113     363     476     1     174     85     5     -     741     113    363    476    1    174    85    5    -    741 

End of 2015

   96     305     401     1     146     64     -     -     612     96    305    401    1    146    64    -    -    612 

End of 2016

   90     250     340     -     119     79     -     -     538     90    250    340    -    119    79    -    -    538 

End of 2017

   109    392    501    -    106    64    -    -    671 
     

 

Equity affiliates

                                    

End of 2013

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -  

End of 2014

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    - 

End of 2015

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    - 

End of 2016

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    - 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    - 
     

 

Notable changes in proved crude oil reserves in the three years ended December 31, 2016,2017, included:

 

  Revisions: In 2017, revisions in Alaska, Lower 48, Europe and Asia Pacific/Middle East were primarily due to higher prices. In 2016, revisions in Lower 48 and Alaska were primarily due to lower prices. In 2015, revisions in Alaska, Lower 48 and Asia Pacific/Middle East were primarily due to lower prices.

 

  Extensions and discoveries: In 2017, extensions and discoveries in Lower 48 were primarily due to continued drilling success in the Permian Unconventional, Eagle Ford and Bakken. In 2016, extensions and discoveries in Alaska were primarily due to drilling success in the Western North Slope. In 2016Slope, and 2014, extensions and discoveries in Lower 48 were primarily due to continued drilling success in Eagle Ford and Bakken.

 

  Sales: In 2014,2017, Canada sales in Africa reflectwere due to the saledisposition of the Nigeria business.a majority of our western Canada assets.

Years Ended

   Natural Gas Liquids     Natural Gas Liquids 

December 31

   Millions of Barrels     Millions of Barrels 
   Alaska    
 
Lower
48
  
  
  
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
 Canada   Europe    
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
 Africa   Total     Alaska   
Lower
48
 
 
  
Total
U.S.
 
 
 Canada  Europe   
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
 Total 

Developed and Undeveloped

                 

Consolidated operations

                 

End of 2013

   125   462   587   56   28   14   14   699  

Revisions

   -   (13 (13 15   (1 2    -   3  

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -  

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -  

Extensions and discoveries

   -   26   26   3    -    -    -   29  

Production

   (5 (35 (40 (8 (3 (3 (1 (55

Sales

   -    -    -   (1  -    -   (13 (14
     

End of 2014

   120   440   560   65   24   13    -   662     120  440  560  65  24  13  662 

Revisions

   (1 (84 (85 (10 (1 (2  -   (98   (1 (84 (85 (10 (1 (2 (98

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -   10   10   2    -    -    -   12     -  10  10  2   -   -  12 

Production

   (5 (36 (41 (9 (3 (3  -   (56   (5 (36 (41 (9 (3 (3 (56

Sales

   -   (9 (9 (3  -    -    -   (12   -  (9 (9 (3  -   -  (12
          

End of 2015

   114   321   435   45   20   8    -   508     114  321  435  45  20  8  508 

Revisions

   (3 (29 (32 9   2    -    -   (21   (3 (29 (32 9  2   -  (21

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -   18   18   2    -    -    -   20     -  18  18  2   -   -  20 

Production

   (4 (32 (36 (8 (3 (3  -   (50   (4 (32 (36 (8 (3 (3 (50

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
          

End of 2016

   107   278   385   48   19   5    -   457     107  278  385  48  19  5  457 
     

Equity affiliates

         

End of 2013

   -    -    -    -    -   45    -   45  

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -   10    -   10     4  29  33   -  2  1  36 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -  71  71   -   -  1  72 

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (2  -   (2   (5 (24 (29 (3 (3 (2 (37

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -  (130 (130 (44  -   -  (174
          

End of 2017

   106  224  330  1  18  5  354 
     

Equity affiliates

        

End of 2014

   -    -    -    -    -   53    -   53     -   -   -   -   -  53  53 

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (3  -   (3   -   -   -   -   -  (3 (3

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
          

End of 2015

   -    -    -    -    -   50    -   50     -   -   -   -   -  50  50 

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (3  -   (3   -   -   -   -   -  (3 (3

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
          

End of 2016

   -    -    -    -    -   47    -   47     -   -   -   -   -  47  47 

Revisions

   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Improved recovery

   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases

   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Extensions and discoveries

   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Production

   -   -   -   -   -  (2 (2

Sales

   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
     

End of 2017

   -   -   -   -   -  45  45 
          

Total company

                 

End of 2013

   125   462   587   56   28   59   14   744  

End of 2014

   120   440   560   65   24   66    -   715     120  440  560  65  24  66  715 

End of 2015

   114   321   435   45   20   58    -   558     114  321  435  45  20  58  558 

End of 2016

   107   278   385   48   19   52    -   504     107  278  385  48  19  52  504 

End of 2017

   106  224  330  1  18  50  399 
          

Years Ended  Natural Gas Liquids   Natural Gas Liquids 
December 31  Millions of Barrels   Millions of Barrels 
   Alaska     
 
Lower
48
  
  
   
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
   Canada     Europe     
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
   Africa     Total     Alaska    
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
   Total 

Developed

                              

Consolidated operations

                              

End of 2013

   125     362     487     50     19     13     14     583  

End of 2014

   120     337     457     57     18     11     -     543     120    337    457    57    18    11    543 

End of 2015

   114     235     349     45     16     8     -     418     114    235    349    45    16    8    418 

End of 2016

   107     209     316     47     15     5     -     383     107    209    316    47    15    5    383 

End of 2017

   106    101    207    1    16    2    226 

Equity affiliates

                              

End of 2013

   -     -     -     -     -     45     -     45  

End of 2014

   -     -     -     -     -     53     -     53     -    -    -    -    -    53    53 

End of 2015

   -     -     -     -     -     50     -     50     -    -    -    -    -    50    50 

End of 2016

   -     -     -     -     -     47     -     47     -    -    -    -    -    47    47 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    45    45 

Undeveloped

                              

Consolidated operations

                              

End of 2013

   -     100     100     6     9     1     -     116  

End of 2014

   -     103     103     8     6     2     -     119     -    103    103    8    6    2    119 

End of 2015

   -     86     86     -     4     -     -     90     -    86    86    -    4    -    90 

End of 2016

   -     69     69     1     4     -     -     74     -    69    69    1    4    -    74 

End of 2017

   -    123    123    -    2    3    128 

Equity affiliates

                              

End of 2013

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -  

End of 2014

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -    - 

End of 2015

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -    - 

End of 2016

   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -    - 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    -    - 

Notable changes in proved natural gas liquids reserves in the three years ended December 31, 2016,2017, included:

 

  Revisions: In 2017, revisions in Lower 48 were primarily due to higher prices. In 2015, revisions in Lower 48 and Canada were primarily due to lower prices.

 

  Extensions and discoveries: In 2014,2017, extensions and discoveries in Lower 48 were primarily due to continued drilling success in the Permian Unconventional, Eagle Ford and Bakken.

Sales: In 2017, Lower 48 sales were due to the disposition of our interests in the San Juan Basin and Panhandle assets, while Canada sales were due to the disposition of a majority of our western Canada assets.

Years Ended  Natural Gas    Natural Gas 
  

 

 

 
December 31  Billions of Cubic Feet    Billions of Cubic Feet 
  

 

 

 
   Alaska    
 
Lower
48
  
  
  
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
 Canada   Europe    
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
 Africa   Total  
  

 

 

    Alaska   
Lower
48
 
 
  
Total
U.S.
 
 
 Canada  Europe   
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
 Africa  Total 

Developed and Undeveloped

                  

Consolidated operations

                  

End of 2013

   2,865   6,711   9,576   1,878   1,809   2,046   950   16,259   

Revisions

   (75 581   506   225   (54 115    -   792   

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -   3    -     

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -      

Extensions and discoveries

   7   256   263   85    -   3    -   351   

Production

   (78 (601 (679 (259 (182 (289 (34 (1,443)  

Sales

   -   (2 (2 (13  -    -   (689 (704)  

 

End of 2014

   2,719   6,945   9,664   1,916   1,573   1,878   227   15,258      2,719  6,945  9,664  1,916  1,573  1,878  227  15,258  

Revisions

   (293 (884 (1,177 (111 (27 110    -   (1,205)     (293 (884 (1,177 (111 (27 110   -  (1,205) 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -   1    -   8    -        -   -   -  1   -  8   -   

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Extensions and discoveries

   4   103   107   44    -   2    -   153      4  103  107  44   -  2   -  153  

Production

   (83 (588 (671 (261 (187 (285  -   (1,404)     (83 (588 (671 (261 (187 (285  -  (1,404) 

Sales

   -   (405 (405 (482  -    -    -   (887)     -  (405 (405 (482  -   -   -  (887) 

      

End of 2015

   2,347   5,171   7,518   1,107   1,359   1,713   227   11,924      2,347  5,171  7,518  1,107  1,359  1,713  227  11,924  

Revisions

   (105 (124 (229 111   56   18    -   (44)     (105 (124 (229 111  56  18   -  (44) 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -   1    -        -   -   -   -   -  1   -   

Purchases

   -    -    -   1    -    -    -        -   -   -  1   -   -   -   

Extensions and discoveries

   2   162   164   43    -   124    -   331      2  162  164  43   -  124   -  331  

Production

   (73 (494 (567 (192 (177 (288  -   (1,224)     (73 (494 (567 (192 (177 (288  -  (1,224) 

Sales

   (69 (1 (70 (33  -   (42  -   (145)     (69 (1 (70 (33  -  (42  -  (145) 

      

End of 2016

   2,102   4,714   6,816   1,037   1,238   1,526   227   10,844      2,102  4,714  6,816  1,037  1,238  1,526  227  10,844  

 

Equity affiliates

         

End of 2013

   -    -    -    -    -   4,129    -   4,129   

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -   768    -   768      287  460  747  8  167  16   -  938  

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -   531    -   531      2  582  584  3   -  23   -  610  

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (186  -   (186)     (71 (338 (409 (71 (188 (267 (3 (938) 

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -  (2,885 (2,885 (966  -   -   -  (3,851) 

      

End of 2017

   2,320  2,533  4,853  11  1,217  1,298  224  7,603  
     

Equity affiliates

         

End of 2014

   -    -    -    -    -   5,242    -   5,242      -   -   -   -   -  5,242   -  5,242  

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -   (2  -   (2)     -   -   -   -   -  (2  -  (2) 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -   268    -   268      -   -   -   -   -  268   -  268  

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (239  -   (239)     -   -   -   -   -  (239  -  (239) 

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

      

End of 2015

   -    -    -    -    -   5,269    -   5,269      -   -   -   -   -  5,269   -  5,269  

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -   (676  -   (676)     -   -   -   -   -  (676  -  (676) 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -   125    -   125      -   -   -   -   -  125   -  125  

Production

   -    -    -    -    -   (337  -   (337)     -   -   -   -   -  (337  -  (337) 

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

      

End of 2016

   -    -    -    -    -   4,381    -   4,381      -   -   -   -   -  4,381   -  4,381  

Revisions

   -   -   -   -   -  111   -  111  

Improved recovery

   -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Purchases

   -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Extensions and discoveries

   -   -   -   -   -  185   -  185  

Production

   -   -   -   -   -  (374  -  (374) 

Sales

   -   -   -   -   -   -   -    
     

End of 2017

   -   -   -   -   -  4,303   -  4,303  

      

Total company

                  

End of 2013

   2,865   6,711   9,576   1,878   1,809   6,175   950   20,388   

End of 2014

   2,719   6,945   9,664   1,916   1,573   7,120   227   20,500      2,719  6,945  9,664  1,916  1,573  7,120  227  20,500  

End of 2015

   2,347   5,171   7,518   1,107   1,359   6,982   227   17,193      2,347  5,171  7,518  1,107  1,359  6,982  227  17,193  

End of 2016

   2,102   4,714   6,816   1,037   1,238   5,907   227   15,225      2,102  4,714  6,816  1,037  1,238  5,907  227  15,225  

End of 2017

   2,320  2,533  4,853  11  1,217  5,601  224  11,906  

      

Years Ended  Natural Gas   Natural Gas 
December 31  Billions of Cubic Feet   Billions of Cubic Feet 
   Alaska     
 
Lower
48
  
  
   
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
   Canada     Europe     
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
   Africa     Total     Alaska    
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
   Africa    Total 

Developed

                                

Consolidated operations

                                

End of 2013

   2,815     5,822     8,637     1,786     1,276     1,593     881     14,173  

End of 2014

   2,663     5,922     8,585     1,801     1,182     1,553     226     13,347     2,663    5,922    8,585    1,801    1,182    1,553    226    13,347 

End of 2015

   2,313     4,458     6,771     1,101     1,088     1,421     227     10,608     2,313    4,458    6,771    1,101    1,088    1,421    227    10,608 

End of 2016

   2,094     4,199     6,293     1,031     998     1,188     227     9,737     2,094    4,199    6,293    1,031    998    1,188    227    9,737 

End of 2017

   2,310    1,597    3,907    11    997    945    224   

 

6,084

 

Equity affiliates

                                

End of 2013

   -     -     -     -     -     2,606     -     2,606  

End of 2014

   -     -     -     -     -     3,954     -     3,954     -    -    -    -    -    3,954    -    3,954 

End of 2015

   -     -     -     -     -     4,482     -     4,482     -    -    -    -    -    4,482    -    4,482 

End of 2016

   -     -     -     -     -     4,110     -     4,110     -    -    -    -    -    4,110    -    4,110 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    4,044    -    4,044 

Undeveloped

                                

Consolidated operations

                                

End of 2013

   50     889     939     92     533     453     69     2,086  

End of 2014

   56     1,023     1,079     115     391     325     1     1,911     56    1,023    1,079    115    391    325    1    1,911 

End of 2015

   34     713     747     6     271     292     -     1,316     34    713    747    6    271    292    -    1,316 

End of 2016

   8     515     523     6     240     338     -     1,107     8    515    523    6    240    338    -    1,107 

End of 2017

   10    936    946    -    220    353    -    1,519 

Equity affiliates

                                

End of 2013

   -     -     -     -     -     1,523     -     1,523  

End of 2014

   -     -     -     -     -     1,288     -     1,288     -    -    -    -    -    1,288    -    1,288 

End of 2015

   -     -     -     -     -     787     -     787     -    -    -    -    -    787    -    787 

End of 2016

   -     -     -     -     -     271     -     271     -    -    -    -    -    271    -    271 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    259    -    259 

Natural gas production in the reserves table may differ from gas production (delivered for sale) in our statistics disclosure, primarily because the quantities above include gas consumed in production operations.

Natural gas reserves are computed at 14.65 pounds per square inch absolute and 60 degrees Fahrenheit.

Notable changes in proved natural gas reserves in the three years ended December 31, 2016,2017, included:

 

  Revisions: In 2017, revisions in Alaska, Lower 48 and Europe were primarily due to higher prices. In 2016, revisions in our equity affiliates in Asia Pacific/Middle East were primarily due to lower prices. In 2015, revisions in Lower 48, Alaska and Canada were primarily due to lower prices, partially offset by positive revisions in Asia Pacific/Middle East from Indonesia. In 2014, revisions were primarily due to higher prices, increased development activity and strong well performance in Lower 48 and higher prices and improved well performance in Canada and our consolidated operations in Asia Pacific/Middle East. This was partially offset by lower prices and higher costs in Alaska. For our equity affiliates in Asia Pacific/Middle East, 2014 revisions were primarily due to strong field performance.

 

  Extensions and discoveries: In 20152017, extensions and 2014,discoveries in Lower 48 were primarily due to continued drilling success in the Permian Unconventional, Eagle Ford and Bakken. In 2015, for our equity affiliates in Asia Pacific/Middle East, extensions and discoveries were due to APLNG’s ongoing development drilling onshore Australia. In 2014, extensions and discoveries in Lower 48 and Canada were primarily due to continued drilling success in Eagle Ford and Bakken and ongoing development activity in western Canada.

 

  Sales: In 2017, Lower 48 sales were due to the disposition of our interests in the San Juan Basin and Panhandle assets, while Canada sales were due to the disposition of a majority of our western Canada assets. In 2015, Lower 48 sales were due to the disposition of non-corenoncore assets in South Texas, East Texas and North Louisiana and sales of assets in British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Alberta impacted Canada. In 2014, for our consolidated operations in Africa, sales were due to the disposition of the Nigeria business.

Years Ended Bitumen 
December 31     Millions of Barrels     
  Canada 

Developed and Undeveloped

 

Consolidated operations

 

End of 2013

579 

Revisions

(8)

Improved recovery

Purchases

Extensions and discoveries

31 

Production

(4)

Sales

End of 2014

  598  

Revisions

  94  

Improved recovery

   

Purchases

   

Extensions and discoveries

   

Production

  (5) 

Sales

   

 

 

End of 2015

  687  

Revisions

  (515) 

Improved recovery

   

Purchases

   

Extensions and discoveries

   

Production

  (13) 

Sales

   

 

 

End of 2016

  159  

Equity affiliates

End of 2013

1,451 

Revisions

  (14)16  

Improved recovery

   

Purchases

   

Extensions and discoveries

  7496  

Production

  (43)(21) 

Sales

   

 

 

End of 2017

250 

Equity affiliates

End of 2014

  1,468  

Revisions

  190  

Improved recovery

   

Purchases

   

Extensions and discoveries

  99  

Production

  (51) 

Sales

   

 

 

End of 2015

  1,706  

Revisions

  (573) 

Improved recovery

   

Purchases

   

Extensions and discoveries

  10  

Production

  (54) 

Sales

   

 

 

End of 2016

  1,089  

Revisions

Improved recovery

Purchases

Extensions and discoveries

Production

(23)

Sales

(1,066)

End of 2017

 

 

Total company

 

End of 2013

2,030 

End of 2014

  2,066  

End of 2015

  2,393  

End of 2016

  1,248

End of 2017

250  

 

 

Years Ended  Bitumen 
December 31      Millions of Barrels     
   Canada 

Developed

  

Consolidated operations

  

End of 2013

16

End of 2014

   13 

End of 2015

   111 

End of 2016

   159 

End of 2017

154

 

 

Equity affiliates

  

End of 2013

181

End of 2014

   187 

End of 2015

   311 

End of 2016

   322 

End of 2017

-

 

 

Undeveloped

  

Consolidated operations

  

End of 2013

563

End of 2014

   585 

End of 2015

   576 

End of 2016

   - 

End of 2017

96

 

 

Equity affiliates

  

End of 2013

1,270

End of 2014

   1,281 

End of 2015

   1,395 

End of 2016

   767 

End of 2017

-

 

 

Notable changes in proved bitumen reserves in the three years ended December 31, 2016,2017, included:

 

  Revisions: In 2017, revisions were primarily due to higher prices at Surmont. In 2016, for both our consolidated operations and equity affiliates revisions were primarily related to lower prices which resulted in reserve reductions at Surmont, Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Narrows Lake. In 2015, for both our consolidated operations and equity affiliates revisions were primarily related to reduced royalties from lower prices at Surmont, Foster Creek, Christina Lake and Narrows Lake.

 

  Extensions and discoveries: In 2017, extensions and discoveries were primarily due to higher prices at Surmont, which allowed undeveloped reserves previouslyde-booked due to low prices to be recognized. In 2015, for our equity affiliates extensions and discoveries were related to approval of development at Christina Lake.

Sales: In 2014, for2017, sales were due to the disposition of our consolidated operations extensions and discoveries were primarily related to delineation activity at Surmont. In 2014, for our equity affiliates extensions and discoveries were primarily related to delineation activity at Foster Creek and Christina Lake, as well as regulatory approval of a development area at Foster Creek.50 percent interest in the FCCL Partnership.

Years Ended  Total Proved Reserves   Total Proved Reserves 
  

 

 

 
December 31  Millions of Barrels of Oil Equivalent   Millions of Barrels of Oil Equivalent 
  

 

 

 
   Alaska    
 
Lower
48
  
  
  
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
 Canada   Europe    
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
 Africa    
 
Other
Areas
  
  
 Total     Alaska    
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
   Africa    
Other
Areas
 
 
   Total 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Developed and Undeveloped

          

Developed and Undeveloped

 

                

Consolidated operations

          

Consolidated operations

 

                

End of 2013

   1,708   2,187   3,895   970   785   588   409    -   6,647   

Revisions

   (19 109   90   48   (10 26    -    -   154   

Improved recovery

   8    -   8   2    -   3    -    -   13   

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -      

Extensions and discoveries

   17   184   201   50    -   17    -    -   268   

Production

   (78 (206 (284 (61 (78 (81 (11  -   (515)  

Sales

   -    -    -   (3  -    -   (156  -   (159)  

 

End of 2014

   1,636   2,274   3,910   1,006   697   553   242    -   6,408      1,636    2,274    3,910    1,006    697    553    242    -    6,408  

Revisions

   (165 (301 (466 66   (26 (12  -    -   (438)     (165)    (301)    (466)    66    (26)    (12)    -    -    (438) 

Improved recovery

   4   4   8   2    -   32    -    -   42      4    4    8    2    -    32    -    -    42  

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Extensions and discoveries

   20   84   104   10    -   8    -    -   122      20    84    104    10    -    8    -    -    122  

Production

   (75 (211 (286 (62 (78 (84  -    -   (510)     (75)    (211)    (286)    (62)    (78)    (84)    -    -    (510) 

Sales

   -   (79 (79 (92  -    -    -    -   (171)     -    (79)    (79)    (92)    -    -    -    -    (171) 

 

 

End of 2015

   1,420   1,771   3,191   930   593   497   242    -   5,453      1,420    1,771    3,191    930    593    497    242    -    5,453  

Revisions

   (77 (143 (220 (484 11   9    -    -   (684)     (77)    (143)    (220)    (484)    11    9    -    -    (684) 

Improved recovery

   6   3   9    -    -   7    -    -   16      6    3    9    -    -    7    -    -    16  

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Extensions and discoveries

   33   124   157   9    -   28    -    -   194      33    124    157    9    -    28    -    -    194  

Production

   (76 (185 (261 (55 (76 (87 (1  -   (480)     (76)    (185)    (261)    (55)    (76)    (87)    (1)    -    (480) 

Sales

   (12  -   (12 (7  -   (10  -    -   (29)     (12)    -    (12)    (7)    -    (10)    -    -    (29) 

 

 

End of 2016

   1,294   1,570   2,864   393   528   444   241    -   4,470      1,294    1,570    2,864    393    528    444    241    -    4,470  

 

Equity affiliates

          

End of 2013

   -    -    -   1,451    -   819    -   4   2,274   

Revisions

   -    -    -   (14  -   155    -   3   144      166    170    336    18    68    36    -    -    458  

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         6    -    6    -    -    -    -    -     

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -   74    -   89    -    -   163      41    378    419    97    -    7    -    -    523  

Production

   -    -    -   (43  -   (38  -   (2 (83)     (77)    (144)    (221)    (37)    (79)    (81)    (8)    -    (426) 

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    (621)    (621)    (217)    -    -    -    -    (838) 

 

 

End of 2017

   1,430    1,353    2,783    254    517    406    233    -    4,193  

 

Equity affiliates

                  

End of 2014

   -    -    -   1,468    -   1,025    -   5   2,498      -    -    -    1,468    -    1,025    -    5    2,498  

Revisions

   -    -    -   190    -   (1  -    -   189      -    -    -    190    -    (1)    -    -    189  

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -   99    -   45    -    -   144      -    -    -    99    -    45    -    -    144  

Production

   -    -    -   (51  -   (48  -   (1 (100)     -    -    -    (51)    -    (48)    -    (1)    (100) 

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -   (4 (4)     -    -    -    -    -    -    -    (4)    (4) 

 

 

End of 2015

   -    -    -   1,706    -   1,021    -    -   2,727      -    -    -    1,706    -    1,021    -    -    2,727  

Revisions

   -    -    -   (573  -   (113  -    -   (686)     -    -    -    (573)    -    (113)    -    -    (686) 

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -   10    -   21    -    -   31      -    -    -    10    -    21    -    -    31  

Production

   -    -    -   (54  -   (64  -    -   (118)     -    -    -    (54)    -    (64)    -    -    (118) 

Sales

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

 

 

End of 2016

   -    -    -   1,089    -   865    -    -   1,954      -    -    -    1,089    -    865    -    -    1,954  

Revisions

   -    -    -    -    -    18    -    -    18  

Improved recovery

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Purchases

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     

Extensions and discoveries

   -    -    -    -    -    31    -    -    31  

Production

   -    -    -    (23)    -    (69)    -    -    (92) 

Sales

   -    -    -    (1,066)    -    -    -    -    (1,066) 

 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    845    -    -    845  

 

 

Total company

                            

End of 2013

   1,708   2,187   3,895   2,421   785   1,407   409   4   8,921   

End of 2014

   1,636   2,274   3,910   2,474   697   1,578   242   5   8,906      1,636    2,274    3,910    2,474    697    1,578    242    5    8,906  

End of 2015

   1,420   1,771   3,191   2,636   593   1,518   242    -   8,180      1,420    1,771    3,191    2,636    593    1,518    242    -    8,180  

End of 2016

   1,294   1,570   2,864   1,482   528   1,309   241    -   6,424      1,294    1,570    2,864    1,482    528    1,309    241    -    6,424  

End of 2017

   1,430    1,353    2,783    254    517    1,251    233    -    5,038  

 

 

Years Ended  Total Proved Reserves   Total Proved Reserves 
December 31  Millions of Barrels of Oil Equivalent   Millions of Barrels of Oil Equivalent 
   Alaska     
 
Lower
48
  
  
   
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
   Canada     Europe     
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
   Africa     
 
Other
Areas
  
  
   Total     Alaska    
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
   Africa    
Other
Areas
 
 
   Total 
  

 

 

 

Developed

                                    

Consolidated operations

                                    

End of 2013

   1,597     1,600     3,197     386     478     405     391     -     4,857  

End of 2014

   1,514     1,637     3,151     393     452     412     237     -     4,645     1,514    1,637    3,151    393    452    412    237    -    4,645 

End of 2015

   1,318     1,261     2,579     352     398     384     242     -     3,955     1,318    1,261    2,579    352    398    384    242    -    3,955 

End of 2016

   1,203     1,165     2,368     391     365     309     241     -     3,674     1,203    1,165    2,368    391    365    309    241    -    3,674 

End of 2017

   1,319    682    2,001    158    372    281    233    -    3,045 

Equity affiliates

                                    

End of 2013

   -     -     -     181     -     565     -     4     750  

End of 2014

   -     -     -     187     -     810     -     5     1,002     -    -    -    187    -    810    -    5    1,002 

End of 2015

   -     -     -     311     -     890     -     -     1,201     -    -    -    311    -    890    -    -    1,201 

End of 2016

   -     -     -     322     -     820     -     -     1,142     -    -    -    322    -    820    -    -    1,142 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    802    -    -    802 

Undeveloped

                                    

Consolidated operations

                                    

End of 2013

   111     587     698     584     307     183     18     -     1,790  

End of 2014

   122     637     759     613     245     141     5     -     1,763     122    637    759    613    245    141    5    -    1,763 

End of 2015

   102     510     612     578     195     113     -     -     1,498     102    510    612    578    195    113    -    -    1,498 

End of 2016

   91     405     496     2     163     135     -     -     796     91    405    496    2    163    135    -    -    796 

End of 2017

   111    671    782    96    145    125    -    -    1,148 

Equity affiliates

                                    

End of 2013

   -     -     -     1,270     -     254     -     -     1,524  

End of 2014

   -     -     -     1,281     -     215     -     -     1,496     -    -    -    1,281    -    215    -    -    1,496 

End of 2015

   -     -     -     1,395     -     131     -     -     1,526     -    -    -    1,395    -    131    -    -    1,526 

End of 2016

   -     -     -     767     -     45     -     -     812     -    -    -    767    -    45    -    -    812 

End of 2017

   -    -    -    -    -    43    -    -    43 

Natural gas reserves are converted to barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) based on a 6:1 ratio: six thousand cubic feet of natural gas converts to one BOE.

Proved Undeveloped Reserves

We had 1,6081,191 million BOE of proved undeveloped reserves atyear-end 2016, 2017, compared with 3,0241,608 million BOE atyear-end 2015. 2016. The following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2016:2017:

 

   Proved Undeveloped Reserves 
  

Millions of Barrels of
 
   

Millions of Barrels of

Oil Equivalent

 

End of 20152016

   3,0241,608  

Transfers to proved developed

   (310)(194) 

Revisions

   (1,328)29  

Improved recovery

   136  

Purchases

    

Extensions and discoveries

   212527  

Sales

   (3)(785

) 

End of 20162017

   1,6081,191  

 

 

Revisions,Sales were primarily due to the disposition of our 50 percent interest in the oil sands, decreased proved undeveloped reserves due to lower prices. This wasFCCL Partnership, which were partially offset by extensions and discoveries added from ongoing development primarily in the Lower 48, Alaska, Canada and Asia Pacific/Middle East and Alaska.East.

As a result, at December 31, 2016,2017, our proved undeveloped reserves represented 2524 percent of total proved reserves, compared with 3725 percent at December 31, 2015.2016. Costs incurred for the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves were $2.9$3.5 billion.

A portion of our costs incurred each year relaterelates to development projects where the proved undeveloped reserves will be converted to proved developed reserves in future years.

Approximately 70

At the end of 2017, more than 90 percent of ourtotal proved undeveloped reserves at year-end 2016 were associated with fourare currently under development or scheduled for development within five years of initial disclosure. The remainder are to be developed as parts of major development areas.projects ongoing in our Europe and Asia Pacific/Middle East regions. All of the major development areas are currently producing and are expected to have proved undeveloped reserves convert to proved developed over time, as development activities continue and/or production facilities are expanded or upgraded, and include:

FCCL oil sands—Foster Creek and Christina Lake in Canada.

The Eagle Ford and Bakken areas in the Lower 48.

At the end of 2016, approximately 46time. Approximately 74 percent of our total proved undeveloped reserves atyear-end 2017 are currently scheduledin North America, and all of these reserve volumes are planned for development within five years or more fromof initial disclosure which are located in the Athabasca oil sands in Canada. The oil sands in Canada consist of the FCCL and Surmont steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) projects. The majority of our remaining proved undeveloped reserves in this area were recorded beginning in 2007. Our SAGD projects are large, multi-year projects with steady, long-term production at consistent levels. The associated undeveloped reserves are expected to be developed over the life of the project, as additional well pairs are drilled to maintain throughput at the central processing facilities.disclosure.

Results of Operations

The company’s results of operations from oil and gas activities for the years 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015 are shown in the following tables.Non-oil and gas activities, such as pipeline and marine operations, liquefied natural gas operations, crude oil and gas marketing activities, and the profit element of transportation operations in which we have an ownership interest are excluded. Additional information about selected line items within the results of operations tables is shown below:

 

Sales include sales to unaffiliated entities attributable primarily to the company’s net working interests and royalty interests. Sales are net of fees to transport our produced hydrocarbons beyond the production function to a final delivery point using transportation operations which are not consolidated.

 

Transportation costs reflect fees to transport our produced hydrocarbons beyond the production function to a final delivery point using transportation operations which are consolidated.

 

Other revenues include gains and losses from asset sales, certain amounts resulting from the purchase and sale of hydrocarbons, and other miscellaneous income.

 

Production costs include costs incurred to operate and maintain wells, related equipment and facilities used in the production of petroleum liquids and natural gas.

 

Taxes other than income taxes include production, property and othernon-income taxes.

 

Depreciation of support equipment is reclassified as applicable.

 

Other related expenses include inventory fluctuations, foreign currency transaction gains and losses and other miscellaneous expenses.

Results of Operations

 

Year Ended  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

   Alaska    
 
Lower
48
  
  
  
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
 Canada   Europe    
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
 Africa    
 
Other
Areas
  
  
 Total  

December 31, 2017

   Alaska   
Lower
48
 
 
  
Total
U.S.
 
 
 Canada  Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
 Africa   
Other
Areas
 
 
 Total 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated operations

                     

Sales

  $2,793   4,117   6,910   661   2,678   2,350    -    -   12,599    $3,542  4,557  8,099  705  3,527    2,752  487   -  15,570 

Transfers

   8    -   8    -    -   347    -    -   355     4   -  4   -   -    411   -   -  415 

Transportation costs

   (676  -   (676  -    -   (40  -    -   (716   (706  -  (706  -   -    (80  -   -  (786

Other revenues

   375   111   486   48   (34 (25 147   9   631     14  28  42  2,158  68    11  48  322  2,649 

 

 

Total revenues

   2,500   4,228   6,728   709   2,644   2,632   147   9   12,869     2,854  4,585  7,439  2,863  3,595    3,094  535  322  17,848 

Production costs excluding taxes

   1,056   1,967   3,023   790   795   640   23   (2 5,269     985  1,669  2,654  609  775    574  44   -  4,656 

Taxes other than income taxes

   231   308   539   55   31   30   1    -   656     275  318  593  33  32    39  2   -  699 

Exploration expenses

   45   1,227   1,272   332   90   38   138   41   1,911     83  584  667  22  45    97  61  45  937 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   738   4,167   4,905   881   1,390   1,402   2    -   8,580     730  2,685  3,415  438  1,234    1,283  16   -  6,386 

Impairments

   1   148   149   88   (161 44    -    -   120     179  3,969  4,148  22  46    -   -   -  4,216 

Other related expenses

   52   70   122   (51 (77 (13 4   4   (11   (7 62  55  7  57    60  6   -  185 

Accretion

   52   72   124   32   210   35    -    -   401     52  63  115  16  172    37   -   -  340 

 

 
   325   (3,731 (3,406 (1,418 366   456   (21 (34 (4,057   557  (4,765 (4,208 1,716  1,234    1,004  406  277  429 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (29 (1,349 (1,378 (406 3   250   (72 (13 (1,616   (678 (2,424 (3,102 (651 702    363  428  11  (2,249

 

 

Results of operations

  $354   (2,382 (2,028 (1,012 363   206   51   (21 (2,441  $1,235  (2,341 (1,106 2,367  532    641  (22 266  2,678 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                     

Sales

  $-    -    -   860    -   449    -    -   1,309    $-   -   -  528   -    563   -   -  1,091 

Transfers

   -    -    -    -    -   825    -    -   825     -   -   -   -   -    1,398   -   -  1,398 

Transportation costs

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -    -   -   -   - 

Other revenues

   -    -    -    -    -   (2  -    -   (2   -   -   -  5   -    -   -   -  5 

 

 

Total revenues

   -    -    -   860    -   1,272    -    -   2,132     -   -   -  533   -    1,961   -   -  2,494 

Production costs excluding taxes

   -    -    -   431    -   256    -    -   687     -   -   -  174   -    363   -   -  537 

Taxes other than income taxes

   -    -    -   15    -   476    -    -   491     -   -   -  7   -    604   -   -  611 

Exploration expenses

   -    -    -   6    -    -    -    -   6     -   -   -  1   -    1,699   -   -  1,700 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -    -    -   309    -   548    -    -   857     -   -   -  150   -    617   -   -  767 

Impairments

   -    -    -   9    -    -    -    -   9     -   -   -   -   -    1,717   -   -  1,717 

Other related expenses

   -    -    -   (7  -   8    -   24   25     -   -   -  4   -    22   -  19  45 

Accretion

   -    -    -   8    -   7    -    -   15     -   -   -  2   -    11   -   -  13 

 

 
   -    -    -   89    -   (23  -   (24 42     -   -   -  195   -    (3,072  -  (19 (2,896

Income tax provision (benefit)

   -    -    -   24    -   (201  -    -   (177   -   -   -  26   -    (998  -  13  (959

 

 

Results of operations

  $-    -    -   65    -   178    -   (24 219    $-   -   -  169   -    (2,074  -  (32 (1,937

 

 

Year Ended  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

   Alaska    
 
Lower
48
  
  
  
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
 Canada   Europe    
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
 Africa    
 
Other
Areas
  
  
 Total  

December 31, 2016

   Alaska   
Lower
48
 
 
  
Total
U.S.
 
 
 Canada  Europe   
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
 Africa   
Other
Areas
 
 
 Total 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated operations

                    

Sales

  $3,206   4,992   8,198   930   3,637   2,741    -    -   15,506    $2,793  4,117  6,910  661  2,678  2,350   -   -  12,599 

Transfers

   15    -   15    -    -   629    -    -   644     8   -  8   -   -  347   -   -  355 

Transportation costs

   (599  -   (599  -    -   (40  -    -   (639   (676  -  (676  -   -  (40  -   -  (716

Other revenues

   (5 452   447   (19 (28 6   13   2   421     375  111  486  48  (34 (25 147  9  631 

 

 

Total revenues

   2,617   5,444   8,061   911   3,609   3,336   13   2   15,932     2,500  4,228  6,728  709  2,644  2,632  147  9  12,869 

Production costs excluding taxes

   1,242   2,420   3,662   923   1,137   815   42   1   6,580     1,056  1,967  3,023  790  795  640  23  (2 5,269 

Taxes other than income taxes

   281   358   639   62   35   33   3   1   773     231  308  539  55  31  30  1   -  656 

Exploration expenses

   682   1,583   2,265   457   170   268   990   43   4,193     45  1,227  1,272  332  90  38  138  41  1,911 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   548   4,192   4,740   777   1,813   1,321    -    -   8,651     738  4,167  4,905  881  1,390  1,402  2   -  8,580 

Impairments

   8   (2 6   3   724   3    -    -   736     1  148  149  88  (161 44   -   -  120 

Other related expenses

   (30 78   48   8   9   (2 (8 5   60     52  70  122  (51 (77 (13 4  4  (11

Accretion

   52   83   135   49   240   34    -    -   458     52  72  124  32  210  35   -   -  401 

 

 
   (166 (3,268 (3,434 (1,368 (519 864   (1,014 (48 (5,519   325  (3,731 (3,406 (1,418 366  456  (21 (34 (4,057

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (89 (1,193 (1,282 (244 (816 430   (406 (27 (2,345   (29 (1,349 (1,378 (406 3  250  (72 (13 (1,616

 

 

Results of operations

  $(77 (2,075 (2,152 (1,124 297   434   (608 (21 (3,174  $354  (2,382 (2,028 (1,012 363  206  51  (21 (2,441

 

 

Equity affiliates

                    

Sales

  $-    -    -   917    -   536    -   50   1,503    $-   -   -  860   -  449   -   -  1,309 

Transfers

   -    -    -    -    -   950    -    -   950     -   -   -   -   -  825   -   -  825 

Transportation costs

   -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -     -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Other revenues

   -    -    -   34    -   4    -   58   96     -   -   -   -   -  (2  -   -  (2

 

 

Total revenues

   -    -    -   951    -   1,490    -   108   2,549     -   -   -  860   -  1,272   -   -  2,132 

Production costs excluding taxes

   -    -    -   474    -   248    -   13   735     -   -   -  431   -  256   -   -  687 

Taxes other than income taxes

   -    -    -   15    -   723    -   13   751     -   -   -  15   -  476   -   -  491 

Exploration expenses

   -    -    -   12    -   190    -    -   202     -   -   -  6   -   -   -   -  6 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -    -    -   367    -   197    -   5   569     -   -   -  309   -  548   -   -  857 

Impairments

   -    -    -    -    -   1,396    -   3   1,399     -   -   -  9   -   -   -   -  9 

Other related expenses

   -    -    -   (2  -   (13  -   23   8     -   -   -  (7  -  8   -  24  25 

Accretion

   -    -    -   7    -   10    -   1   18     -   -   -  8   -  7   -   -  15 

 

 
   -    -    -   78    -   (1,261  -   50   (1,133   -   -   -  89   -  (23  -  (24 42 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   -    -    -   20    -   (155  -   10   (125   -   -   -  24   -  (201  -   -  (177

 

 

Results of operations

  $-    -    -   58    -   (1,106  -   40   (1,008  $-   -   -  65   -  178   -  (24 219 

 

 

Year Ended Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 Alaska    
 
Lower
48
  
  
  
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
 Canada   Europe    
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
 Africa    
 
Other
Areas
  
  
  
 
Disc
Ops
  
  
 Total  

December 31, 2015

   Alaska   
Lower
48
 
 
  
Total
U.S.
 
 
 Canada  Europe   
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
 Africa   
Other
Areas
 
 
 Total 
 

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated operations

                    

Sales

 $6,202   9,098   15,300   2,091   6,160   4,550   185    -   278   28,564     $3,206  4,992  8,198  930  3,637  2,741   -   -  15,506  

Transfers

 47   94   141    -    -   938    -    -    -   1,079      15   -  15   -   -  629   -   -  644  

Transportation costs

 (659  -   (659  -    -   (43  -    -    -   (702)     (599  -  (599  -   -  (40  -   -  (639) 

Other revenues

 13   29   42   185   (25 46   26   154   1,052   1,480      (5 452  447  (19 (28 6  13  2  421  

 

 

Total revenues

 5,603   9,221   14,824   2,276   6,135   5,491   211   154   1,330   30,421      2,617  5,444  8,061  911  3,609  3,336  13  2  15,932  

Production costs excluding taxes

 1,205   2,482   3,687   1,106   1,410   994   83   1   128   7,409      1,242  2,420  3,662  923  1,137  815  42  1  6,580  

Taxes other than income taxes

 842   700   1,542   62   44   299   5   1   8   1,961      281  358  639  62  35  33  3  1  773  

Exploration expenses

 46   1,042   1,088   317   148   123   303   40   4   2,023      682  1,583  2,265  457  170  268  990  43  4,193  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 423   3,662   4,085   919   1,777   1,125   6    -    -   7,912      548  4,192  4,740  777  1,813  1,321   -   -  8,651  

Impairments

 56   107   163   38   529   7    -    -    -   737      8  (2 6  3  724  3   -   -  736  

Other related expenses

 2   96   98   7   (233 (6 (1 9   (9 (135)     (30 78  48  8  9  (2 (8 5  60  

Accretion

 52   80   132   57   245   26    -    -    -   460      52  83  135  49  240  34   -   -  458  

 

 
 2,977   1,052   4,029   (230 2,215   2,923   (185 103   1,199   10,054      (166 (3,268 (3,434 (1,368 (519 864  (1,014 (48 (5,519) 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 1,043   322   1,365   (101 1,452   1,216   4   (13 79   4,002      (89 (1,193 (1,282 (244 (816 430  (406 (27 (2,345) 

 

 

Results of operations

 $1,934   730   2,664   (129 763   1,707   (189 116   1,120   6,052     $(77 (2,075 (2,152 (1,124 297  434  (608 (21 (3,174) 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                    

Sales

 $-    -    -   2,307    -   851    -   96    -   3,254     $-   -   -  917   -  536   -  50  1,503  

Transfers

  -    -    -    -    -   1,663    -    -    -   1,663      -   -   -   -   -  950   -   -  950  

Transportation costs

  -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -         -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -    

Other revenues

  -    -    -   33    -   3    -    -    -   36      -   -   -  34   -  4   -  58  96  

 

 

Total revenues

  -    -    -   2,340    -   2,517    -   96    -   4,953      -   -   -  951   -  1,490   -  108  2,549  

Production costs excluding taxes

  -    -    -   651    -   221    -   18    -   890      -   -   -  474   -  248   -  13  735  

Taxes other than income taxes

  -    -    -   14    -   1,214    -   51    -   1,279      -   -   -  15   -  723   -  13  751  

Exploration expenses

  -    -    -   13   7   8    -    -    -   28      -   -   -  12   -  190   -   -  202  

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  -    -    -   337    -   171    -   7    -   515      -   -   -  367   -  197   -  5  569  

Impairments

  -    -    -    -    -   27    -    -    -   27      -   -   -   -   -  1,396   -  3  1,399  

Other related expenses

  -    -    -   (65 1   (2  -   27    -   (39)     -   -   -  (2  -  (13  -  23   

Accretion

  -    -    -   6    -   8    -   1    -   15      -   -   -  7   -  10   -  1  18  

 

 
  -    -    -   1,384   (8 870    -   (8  -   2,238      -   -   -  78   -  (1,261  -  50  (1,133) 

Income tax provision (benefit)

  -    -    -   331    -   (62  -   2    -   271      -   -   -  20   -  (155  -  10  (125) 

 

 

Results of operations

 $-    -    -   1,053   (8 932    -   (10  -   1,967     $-   -   -  58   -  (1,106  -  40  (1,008) 

 

 

Statistics

 

Net Production

   2016     2015     2014     2017    2016    2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Thousands of Barrels Daily     Thousands of Barrels Daily 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Crude Oil

            

Consolidated operations

            

Alaska

   163     158     162     167    163    158 

Lower 48

   195     206     188     180    195    206 

 

 

United States

   358     364     350     347    358    364 

Canada

   7     12     13     3    7    12 

Europe

   120     120     126     122    120    120 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   97     91     79     93    97    91 

Africa

   2     -     8     20    2    - 

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   584     587     576     585    584    587 

 

 

Equity affiliates

            

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   14     14     15     14    14    14 

Other areas

   -     4     4     -    -    4 

 

 

Total equity affiliates

   14     18     19     14    14    18 

 

 

Total continuing operations

   598     605     595  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     5  

 

Total company

   598     605     600     599    598    605 

 

 

Natural Gas Liquids

            

Consolidated operations

            

Alaska

   12     13     13     14    12    13 

Lower 48

   88     94     97     69    88    94 

 

 

United States

   100     107     110     83    100    107 

Canada

   23     26     23     9    23    26 

Europe

   7     7     8     8    7    7 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   7     9     10     4    7    9 

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   137     149     151     104    137    149 

 

 

Equity affiliates—Asia Pacific/Middle East

   8     7     8     7    8    7 

 

Total continuing operations

   145     156     159  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     1  

 

 

Total company

   145     156     160     111    145    156 

 

 

Bitumen

            

Consolidated operations—Canada

   35     13     12     59    35    13 

Equity affiliates—Canada

   148     138     117     63    148    138 

 

 

Total company

   183     151     129     122    183    151 

 

 

Natural Gas

   Millions of Cubic Feet Daily     Millions of Cubic Feet Daily 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated operations

            

Alaska

   25     42     49     7    25    42 

Lower 48

   1,219     1,472     1,491     898    1,219    1,472 

 

 

United States

   1,244     1,514     1,540     905    1,244    1,514 

Canada

   524     715     711     187    524    715 

Europe

   459     475     461     476    459    475 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   730     717     723     687    730    717 

Africa

   1     1     3     8    1    1 

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   2,958     3,422     3,438     2,263    2,958    3,422 

 

 

Equity affiliates—Asia Pacific/Middle East

   899     638     505     1,007    899    638 

 

 

Total continuing operations

   3,857     4,060     3,943  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     88  

 

Total company

   3,857     4,060     4,031     3,270    3,857    4,060 

 

 

Average Sales Prices

   2016     2015     2014     2017    2016    2015 
  

 

 

 

Crude Oil Per Barrel

            

Consolidated operations

            

Alaska

  $        31.68     41.84     87.21    $        42.69    31.68    41.84 

Lower 48

   37.49     42.62     84.18     47.36    37.49    42.62 

United States

   34.70     42.27     85.63     45.01    34.70    42.27 

Canada

   35.25     39.52     77.87     43.69    35.25    39.52 

Europe

   43.66     52.75     99.56     54.04    43.66    52.75 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   42.23     49.70     95.32     54.38    42.23    49.70 

Africa

   -     60.79     86.71     55.11    -    60.79 

Total international

   42.76     50.79     96.48     54.16    42.76    50.79 

Total consolidated operations

   37.67     45.48     89.72     48.70    37.67    45.48 

 

Equity affiliates

            

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   44.11     53.12     99.01     54.76    44.11    53.12 

Other areas

   -     37.21     64.14     -    -    37.21 

Total equity affiliates

   44.11     49.92     91.48     54.76    44.11    49.92 

Total continuing operations

   37.82     45.61     89.77  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     110.61  

 

Total operations

   48.84    37.82    45.61 

Natural Gas Liquids Per Barrel

            

Consolidated operations

            

Lower 48

  $14.34     14.01     30.74    $22.20    14.34    14.01 

United States

   14.34     14.01     30.74     22.20    14.34    14.01 

Canada

   14.82     17.02     46.23     21.51    14.82    17.02 

Europe

   22.62     27.56     52.65     34.07    22.62    27.56 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   29.00     37.78     69.36     41.37    29.00    37.78 

Total international

   19.06     23.21     53.26     30.34    19.06    23.21 

Total consolidated operations

   15.72     16.83     37.45     24.21    15.72    16.83 

 

Equity affiliates—Asia Pacific/Middle East

   31.13     35.79     67.20     38.74    31.13    35.79 

Total continuing operations

   16.68     17.79     38.99  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     13.41  

 

Total operations

   25.22    16.68    17.79 

Bitumen Per Barrel

            

Consolidated operations—Canada

  $12.91     20.13     60.03  

Equity affiliates—Canada

   15.80     18.58     54.62  

Consolidated operations—Canada

  $21.43    12.91    20.13 

Equity affiliates—Canada

   23.83    15.80    18.58 

 

Natural Gas Per Thousand Cubic Feet

            

Consolidated operations

            

Alaska

  $5.22     4.33     5.42    $2.72    5.22    4.33 

Lower 48

   2.20     2.43     4.29     2.73    2.20    2.43 

United States

   2.24     2.47     4.32     2.73    2.24    2.47 

Canada

   1.49     1.91     4.13     1.93    1.49    1.91 

Europe

   4.71     7.14     9.29     5.72    4.71    7.14 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   4.15     6.08     9.64     4.66    4.15    6.08 

Africa

   -     -     3.40     3.53    -    - 

Total international

   3.49     4.78     7.48     4.64    3.49    4.78 

Total consolidated operations

   2.97     3.77     6.07     3.87    2.97    3.77 

 

Equity affiliates—Asia Pacific/Middle East

   2.97     4.83     9.79     4.27    2.97    4.83 

Total continuing operations

   2.97     3.93     6.54  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     2.53  

 

Total operations

   4.00    2.97    3.93 

 

Average sales prices for Alaska crude oil and Asia Pacific/Middle East natural gas above reflect a reduction for transportation costs in which we have an ownership interest that are incurred subsequent to the terminal point of the production function. Accordingly, the average sales prices differ from those discussed in Item 7 of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

   2016     2015     2014  

Average Production Costs Per Barrel of Oil Equivalent*

      

Consolidated operations

      

Alaska

  $        16.12     19.12     18.04  

Lower 48

   11.06     12.17     12.76  

United States

   12.42     13.88     14.11  

Canada

   14.20     14.88     18.14  

Europe

   10.70     15.05     18.31  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   7.74     10.20     12.97  

Africa

   31.42     -     28.42  

Total international

   10.53     13.41     16.52  

Total consolidated continuing operations

   11.54     13.67     15.20  

Equity affiliates

      

Canada

   7.96     9.41     15.24  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   4.04     5.31     5.66  

Other areas

   -     8.90     12.33  

Total equity affiliates

   5.85     7.46     10.69  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     16.70  

Average Production Costs Per Barrel—Bitumen

      

Consolidated operations—Canada**

  $24.59     61.87     66.89  

Equity affiliates—Canada

   7.96     9.41     15.24  

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes Per Barrel of Oil Equivalent

      

Consolidated operations

      

Alaska

  $3.53     4.33     12.61  

Lower 48

   1.73     1.80     3.60  

United States

   2.21     2.42     5.90  

Canada

   0.99     1.00     1.02  

Europe

   0.42     0.46     0.57  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   0.36     0.41     3.90  

Africa

   1.37     -     1.71  

Total international

   0.55     0.62     1.89  

Total consolidated continuing operations

   1.44     1.61     4.08  

Equity affiliates

      

Canada

   0.28     0.30     0.33  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   7.52     15.48     31.08  

Other areas

   -     8.90     34.93  

Total equity affiliates

   4.18     7.62     15.37  

Discontinued operations

   -     -     1.04  

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Per Barrel of Oil Equivalent

      

Consolidated operations

      

Alaska

  $11.26     8.43     6.33  

Lower 48

   23.43     21.07     18.82  

United States

   20.15     17.96     15.63  

Canada

   15.84     12.52     15.08  

Europe

   18.71     24.00     23.07  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   16.95     16.53     14.68  

Africa

   2.73     -     2.05  

Total international

   17.22     17.98     17.59  

Total consolidated continuing operations

   18.78     17.97     16.52  

Equity affiliates

      

Canada

   5.70     7.29     7.89  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   8.65     4.22     4.38  

Other areas

   -     3.42     4.79  

Total equity affiliates

   7.29     5.77     6.19  

  *Includes bitumen.

   2017    2016    2015 
  

 

 

 

Average Production Costs Per Barrel of Oil Equivalent*

      

Consolidated operations

      

Alaska

  $        14.83    16.12    19.12 

Lower 48

   11.46    11.06    12.17 

United States

   12.52    12.42    13.88 

Canada

   16.36    14.20    14.88 

Europe

   10.16    10.70    15.05 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   7.42    7.74    10.20 

Africa

   5.74    31.42    - 

Total international

   10.08    10.53    13.41 

Total consolidated operations

   11.34    11.54    13.67 

 

 

Equity affiliates

      

Canada

   7.57    7.96    9.41 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   5.26    4.04    5.31 

Other areas

   -    -    8.90 

Total equity affiliates

   5.84    5.85    7.46 

 

 

Average Production Costs Per Barrel—Bitumen

      

Consolidated operations—Canada

  $14.63    24.59    61.87 

Equity affiliates—Canada

   18.74    7.96    9.41 

 

 

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes Per Barrel of Oil Equivalent

      

Consolidated operations

      

Alaska

  $4.14    3.53    4.33 

Lower 48

   2.18    1.73    1.80 

United States

   2.80    2.21    2.42 

Canada

   0.89    0.99    1.00 

Europe

   0.42    0.42    0.46 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   0.50    0.36    0.41 

Africa

   0.26    1.37    - 

Total international

   0.53    0.55    0.62 

Total consolidated operations

   1.70    1.44    1.61 

 

 

Equity affiliates

      

Canada

   0.30    0.28    0.30 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   8.76    7.52    15.48 

Other areas

   -    -    8.90 

Total equity affiliates

   6.64    4.18    7.62 

 

 

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Per Barrel of Oil Equivalent

      

Consolidated operations

      

Alaska

  $10.99    11.26    8.43 

Lower 48

   18.44    23.43    21.07 

United States

   16.10    20.15    17.96 

Canada

   11.76    15.84    12.52 

Europe

   16.18    18.71    24.00 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   16.58    16.95    16.53 

Africa

   2.09    2.73    - 

Total international

   14.96    17.22    17.98 

Total consolidated operations

   15.55    18.78    17.97 

 

 

Equity affiliates

      

Canada

   6.52    5.70    7.29 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   8.94    8.65    4.22 

Other areas

   -    -    3.42 

Total equity affiliates

   8.34    7.29    5.77 

 

 

**2015 revised to conform to current period presentation.Includes bitumen.

Development and Exploration Activities

The following two tables summarize our net interest in productive and dry exploratory and development wells in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014.2015. A “development well” is a well drilled within the proved area of a reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive. An “exploratory well” is a well drilled to find and produce crude oil or natural gas in an unknown field or a new reservoir within a proven field. Exploratory wells also include wells drilled in areas near or offsetting current production, or in areas where well density or production history have not achieved statistical certainty of results. Excluded from the exploratory well count are stratigraphic-type exploratory wells, primarily relating to oil sands delineation wells located in Canada and coalbed methane test wells located in Asia Pacific/Middle East.

 

Net Wells Completed

   Productive       Dry  
  

 

 

     

 

 

 
       2016         2015         2014           2016         2015         2014  
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

Exploratory

              

Consolidated operations

              

Alaska

   2     -     *       1     -     *  

Lower 48

   8     47     30       1     4     3  

 

 

United States

   10     47     30       2     4     3  

Canada

   8     16     9       1     3     *  

Europe

   *     *     1       1     *     1  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   1     1     2       -     2     *  

Africa

   1     *     *       -     *     *  

Other areas

   -     -     -       -     -     -  

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   20     64     42       4     9     4  

 

 

Equity affiliates

              

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   20     19     36       -     *     2  

 

 

Total equity affiliates

   20     19     36       -     -     2  

 

 

Development

              

Consolidated operations

              

Alaska

   9     18     8       -     -     -  

Lower 48

   119     347     450       -     -     1  

 

 

United States

   128     365     458       -     -     1  

Canada

   47     47     98       2     -     -  

Europe

   7     10     7       -     -     -  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   6     3     14       -     *     -  

Africa

   -     -     1       -     -     -  

Other areas

   -     -     -       -     -     -  

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   188     425     578       2     -     1  

 

 

Equity affiliates

              

Canada

   48     22     38       -     -     -  

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   108     166     294       -     2     1  

Other areas

   -     *     1       -     -     -  

 

 

Total equity affiliates

   156     188     333       -     2     1  

 

 
*Our total proportionate interest was less than one.

Net Wells Completed

   Productive      Dry 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 
       2017        2016        2015          2017        2016        2015 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

Exploratory

              

Consolidated operations

              

Alaska

   -    2    -      -    1    - 

Lower 48

   13    8    47      3    1    4 

 

 

United States

   13    10    47      3    2    4 

Canada

   13    8    16      -    1    3 

Europe

   *    *    *      *    1    * 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   1    1    1      1    -    2 

Africa

   -    1    *      -    -    * 

Other areas

   -    -    -      1    -    - 

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   27    20    64      5    4    9 

 

 

Equity affiliates

              

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   14    20    19      -    -    * 

 

 

Total equity affiliates

   14    20    19      -    -    - 

 

 

Development

              

Consolidated operations

              

Alaska

   9    9    18      -    -    - 

Lower 48

   161    119    347      -    -    - 

 

 

United States

   170    128    365      -    -    - 

Canada

   13    47    47      -    2    - 

Europe

   7    7    10      -    -    - 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   8    6    3      -    -    * 

Africa

   -    -    -      -    -    - 

Other areas

   -    -    -      -    -    - 

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   198    188    425      -    2    - 

 

 

Equity affiliates

              

Canada

   19    48    22      -    -    - 

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   84    108    166      -    -    2 

Other areas

   -    -    *      -    -    - 

 

 

Total equity affiliates

   103    156    188      -    -    2 

 

 

*Our total proportionate interest was less than one.

The table below represents the status of our wells drilling at December 31, 2016,2017, and includes wells in the process of drilling or in active completion. It also represents gross and net productive wells, including producing wells and wells capable of production at December 31, 2016.2017.

 

Wells at December 31, 2016   Productive* 
Wells at December 31, 2017Wells at December 31, 2017   Productive* 
        

 

 

       

 

 

 
          In Progress               Oil       Gas            In Progress              Oil      Gas 
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 
          Gross           Net                 Gross           Net                 Gross           Net              Gross    Net                Gross            Net                Gross            Net   
  

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

     

 

 

 

Consolidated operations

                

Consolidated operations

 

              

Alaska

   2     1         1,749     781         -     -       1    1        1,721    769        -    -   

Lower 48

   208     94         10,142     5,107         20,076     13,134       354    179        9,984    4,781        5,222    2,364   

 

 

United States

   210     95         11,891     5,888         20,076     13,134       355    180        11,705    5,550        5,222    2,364   

Canada

   41     24         987     538         4,320     2,966       1    1        182    91        42    34   

Europe

   20     3         471     86         174     67       22    3        486    86        181    68   

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   13     5         356     148         55     28       3    1        370    153        55    28   

Africa

   -     -         825     135         9     1       -    -        825    135        9    2   

Other areas

   3     2         -     -         -     -    

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   287     129         14,530     6,795         24,634     16,196       381    185        13,568    6,015        5,509    2,496   

 

 

Equity affiliates

                                

Canada

   125     62         457     228         -     -    

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   187     64         -     -         3,520     827       176    47        -    -        3,749    907   

 

 

Total equity affiliates

   312     126         457     228         3,520     827       176    47        -    -        3,749    907   

 

 

*Includes 15118 gross and 1226 net multiple completion wells.

 

Acreage at December 31, 2016                      Thousands of Acres                     

Acreage at December 31, 2017

                       Thousands of Acres                      
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Developed       Undeveloped   Developed       Undeveloped 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 
        Gross           Net               Gross           Net           Gross         Net               Gross           Net   
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated operations

                    

Alaska

   608     298         683     469       592    294        1,345    1,014   

Lower 48

   4,903     3,918         10,479     8,475       2,278    1,934        10,632    8,509   

 

 

United States

   5,511     4,216         11,162     8,944       2,870    2,228        11,977    9,523   

Canada

   3,038     2,099         9,471     4,165       187    105        3,251    1,772   

Europe

   834     257         2,219     610       797    244        2,454    720   

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   1,593     741         10,483     5,422       1,596    742        12,568    6,462   

Africa

   358     58         12,545     2,049       358    59        12,545    2,049   

Other areas

   -     -         487     264       -    -        560    323   

 

 

Total consolidated operations

   11,334     7,371         46,367     21,454       5,808    3,378        43,355    20,849   

 

 

Equity affiliates

                    

Canada

   53     22         651     273    

Asia Pacific/Middle East

   818     183         6,365     1,794       872    201        5,445    1,432   

 

 

Total equity affiliates

   871     205         7,016     2,067       872    201        5,445    1,432   

 

 

Costs Incurred

 

Year Ended  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31

   Alaska     
 
Lower
48
  
  
   
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
   Canada     Europe     
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
 Africa     
 
Other
Areas
  
  
   Total     Alaska    
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 Africa    
Other
Areas
 
 
   Total 
  

 

 

 

2017

                 

Consolidated operations

                 

Unproved property acquisition

  $18    267    285    76    -    15   -    -    376 

Proved property acquisition

   -    35    35    -    -    -   -    -    35 

 
   18    302    320    76    -    15   -    -    411 

Exploration

   74    399    473    56    52    139  61    42    823 

Development

   736    1,559    2,295    102    784    388  10    -    3,579 

 
  $828    2,260    3,088    234    836    542  71    42    4,813 

 

Equity affiliates

                 

Unproved property acquisition

  $-    -    -    -    -    -   -    -    - 

Proved property acquisition

   -    -    -    -    -    -   -    -    - 

 
   -    -    -    -    -    -   -    -    - 

Exploration

   -    -    -    6    -    38   -    -    44 

Development

   -    -    -    150    -    403   -    -    553 

 
  $-    -    -    156    -    441   -    -    597 

 
  

 

 

 

2016

                                  

Consolidated operations

                                  

Unproved property acquisition

  $-     127     127     59     -     -    -     -     186    $-    127    127    59    -    -   -    -    186 

Proved property acquisition

   -     5     5     19     -     -    -     -     24     -    5    5    19    -    -   -    -    24 

 

 
   -     132     132     78     -     -    -     -     210     -    132    132    78    -    -   -    -    210 

Exploration

   110     656     766     286     65     52   215     67     1,451     110    656    766    286    65    52  215    67    1,451 

Development

   720     782     1,502     209     62     387   6     -     2,166     720    782    1,502    209    62    387  6    -    2,166 

 

 
  $830     1,570     2,400     573     127     439   221     67     3,827    $830    1,570    2,400    573    127    439  221    67    3,827 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                                  

Unproved property acquisition

  $-     -     -     -     -     2    -     -     2    $-    -    -    -    -    2   -    -    2 

Proved property acquisition

   -     -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -   -    -    - 

 

 
   -     -     -     -     -     2    -     -     2     -    -    -    -    -    2   -    -    2 

Exploration

   -     -     -     15     -     19    -     -     34     -    -    -    15    -    19   -    -    34 

Development

   -     -     -     367     -     312    -     -     679     -    -    -    367    -    320   -    -    687 

 

 
  $-     -     -     382     -     333    -     -     715    $-    -    -    382    -    341   -    -    723 

 

 

2015

                                  

Consolidated operations

                                  

Unproved property acquisition

  $-     168     168     52     -     -    -     -     220    $-    168    168    52    -    -   -    -    220 

Proved property acquisition

   -     5     5     1     -     -    -     -     6     -    5    5    1    -    -   -    -    6 

 

 
   -     173     173     53     -     -    -     -     226     -    173    173    53    -    -   -    -    226 

Exploration

   87     1,369     1,456     298     107     118   394     47     2,420     87    1,369    1,456    298    107    118  394    47    2,420 

Development

   1,217     2,875     4,092     827     1,742     587   4     -     7,252     1,217    2,875    4,092    827    1,742    587  4    -    7,252 

 

 
  $1,304     4,417     5,721     1,178     1,849     705   398     47     9,898    $1,304    4,417    5,721    1,178    1,849    705  398    47    9,898 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                                  

Unproved property acquisition

  $-     -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -    $-    -    -    -    -    -   -    -    - 

Proved property acquisition

   -     -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -   -    -    - 

 

 
   -     -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -     -    -    -    -    -    -   -    -    - 

Exploration

   -     -     -     17     -     60    -     -     77     -    -    -    17    -    60   -    -    77 

Development

   -     -     -     847     -     655    -     3     1,505     -    -    -    847    -    753   -    3    1,603 

 

 
  $-     -     -     864     -     715    -     3     1,582    $-    -    -    864    -    813   -    3    1,680 

 

 

2014

                 

Consolidated operations

                 

Unproved property acquisition

  $-     159     159     61     90     -   6     -     316  

Proved property acquisition

   -     10     10     -     -     -    -     -     10  

 
   -     169     169     61     90     -   6     -     326  

Exploration

   130     1,347     1,477     332     243     166   556     58     2,832  

Development

   1,263     4,881     6,144     2,185     3,618     1,353   71     -     13,371  

 
  $1,393     6,397     7,790     2,578     3,951     1,519   633     58     16,529  

 

Equity affiliates

                 

Unproved property acquisition

  $-     -     -     -     -     2    -     -     2  

Proved property acquisition

   -     -     -     -     -     -    -     -     -  

 
   -     -     -     -     -     2    -     -     2  

Exploration

   -     -     -     23     36     117    -     -     176  

Development

   -     -     -     1,627     -     1,965    -     9     3,601  

 
  $-     -     -     1,650     36     2,084    -     9     3,779  

 

*Certain amounts in Asia Pacific/Middle East equity affiliates have been revised in 2016 and 2015 to reflect additional abandonment obligations.

Capitalized Costs

At December 31  Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   Alaska    
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
  Africa    
Other
Areas
 
 
   Total 
  

 

 

 

2017

                 

Consolidated operations

                 

Proved property

  $18,149    35,332    53,481    6,217    27,221    14,236   889    -    102,044 

Unproved property

   1,068    1,137    2,205    985    290    822   122    67    4,491 

 

 
   19,217    36,469    55,686    7,202    27,511    15,058   1,011    67    106,535 

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   9,497    24,211    33,708    1,582    18,068    8,916   312    9    62,595 

 

 
  $9,720    12,258    21,978    5,620    9,443    6,142   699    58    43,940 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                 

Proved property

  $-    -    -    -    -    9,750   -    -    9,750 

Unproved property

   -    -    -    -    -    2,215   -    -    2,215 

 

 
   -    -    -    -    -    11,965   -    -    11,965 

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -    -    -    -    -    5,342   -    -    5,342 

 

 
  $-    -    -    -    -    6,623   -    -    6,623 

 

 

2016

                 

Consolidated operations

                 

Proved property

  $17,376    46,050    63,426    16,970    24,858    13,837   879    -    119,970 

Unproved property

   1,099    1,376    2,475    1,435    269    787   123    61    5,150 

 

 
   18,475    47,426    65,901    18,405    25,127    14,624   1,002    61    125,120 

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   8,548    26,858    35,406    10,344    15,754    7,635   297    1    69,437 

 

 
  $9,927    20,568    30,495    8,061    9,373    6,989   705    60    55,683 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                 

Proved property

  $-    -    -    9,459    -    8,839   -    -    18,298 

Unproved property

   -    -    -    891    -    2,756   -    -    3,647 

 

 
   -    -    -    10,350    -    11,595   -    -    21,945 

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -    -    -    1,906    -    1,369   -    -    3,275 

 

 
  $-    -    -    8,444    -    10,226   -    -    18,670 

 

 

*Certain amounts in Asia Pacific/Middle East equity affiliates have been restatedrevised in 2015 and 20142016 to remove amounts considered to be non-oil and gas producing activities.

Capitalized Costs

At December 31  Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   Alaska     
 
Lower
48
  
  
   
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
   Canada     Europe     
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East*
  
  
   Africa     
 
Other
Areas
  
  
   Total  
  

 

 

 

2016

                  

Consolidated operations

                  

Proved property

  $17,376     46,050     63,426     16,970     24,858     13,837     879     -     119,970  

Unproved property

   1,099     1,376     2,475     1,435     269     787     123     61     5,150  

 

 
   18,475     47,426     65,901     18,405     25,127     14,624     1,002     61     125,120  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   8,548     26,858     35,406     10,344     15,754     7,635     297     1     69,437  

 

 
  $9,927     20,568     30,495     8,061     9,373     6,989     705     60     55,683  

 

 

Equity affiliates

                  

Proved property

  $-     -     -     9,459     -     8,501     -     -     17,960  

Unproved property

   -     -     -     891     -     2,756     -     -     3,647  

 

 
   -     -     -     10,350     -     11,257     -     -     21,607  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -     -     -     1,906     -     1,369     -     -     3,275  

 

 
  $-     -     -     8,444     -     9,888     -     -     18,332  

 

 

2015

                  

Consolidated operations

                  

Proved property

  $17,007     45,256     62,263     16,552     26,851     16,254     873     3     122,796  

Unproved property

   1,609     2,414     4,023     1,418     330     781     823     35     7,410  

 

 
   18,616     47,670     66,286     17,970     27,181     17,035     1,696     38     130,206  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   8,688     22,993     31,681     9,371     16,166     8,853     788     4     66,863  

 

 
  $9,928     24,677     34,605     8,599     11,015     8,182     908     34     63,343  

 

 

Equity affiliates

                  

Proved property

  $-     -     -     8,763     -     8,086     -     -     16,849  

Unproved property

   -     -     -     906     -     3,040     -     -     3,946  

 

 
   -     -     -     9,669     -     11,126     -     -     20,795  

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -     -     -     1,537     -     1,017     -     -     2,554  

 

 
  $-     -     -     8,132     -     10,109     -     -     18,241  

 

 

*Certain amounts in Asia Pacific/Middle East equity affiliates have been restated in 2015 to remove amounts considered to be non-oil and gas producing activities.reflect additional abandonment obligations.

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserve Quantities

In accordance with SEC and FASB requirements, amounts were computed using12-month average prices (adjusted only for existing contractual terms) andend-of-year costs, appropriate statutory tax rates and a prescribed 10 percent discount factor. Twelve-month average prices are calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of thefirst-day-of-the-month price for each month within the12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period. For all years, continuation ofyear-end economic conditions was assumed. The calculations were based on estimates of proved reserves, which are revised over time as new data becomes available. Probable or possible reserves, which may become proved in the future, were not considered. The calculations also require assumptions as to the timing of future production of proved reserves and the timing and amount of future development costs, including dismantlement, and future production costs, including taxes other than income taxes.

While due care was taken in its preparation, we do not represent that this data is the fair value of our oil and gas properties, or a fair estimate of the present value of cash flows to be obtained from their development and production.

Discounted Future Net Cash Flows

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Alaska    
 
Lower
48
  
  
   
 
Total
U.S.
  
  
 Canada   Europe    
 
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
  
  
   Africa     Total     Alaska    
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
   Africa    Total 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

2016

            

2017

                

Consolidated operations

                            

Future cash inflows

  $29,697   31,963     61,660   4,739   18,533   12,770     10,715     108,417    $44,969    44,556��   89,525    5,479    23,137    15,207    13,181    146,529 

Less:

                            

Future production costs

   24,965   16,936     41,901   5,103   7,469   5,288     1,420     61,181     29,524    18,947    48,471    4,417    8,128    5,398    1,401    67,815 

Future development costs

   7,961   8,932     16,893   1,586   9,949   2,777     537     31,742     7,255    10,881    18,136    696    8,758    2,511    537    30,638 

Future income tax provisions (benefit)

   -   744     744    -   (325 1,563     7,885     9,867  

Future income tax provisions

   53    2,375    2,428    -    3,333    2,459    10,356    18,576 

 

 

Future net cash flows

   (3,229 5,351     2,122   (1,950 1,440   3,142     873     5,627     8,137    12,353    20,490    366    2,918    4,839    887    29,500 

10 percent annual discount

   (3,143 976     (2,167 (1,297 (2 572     370     (2,524   2,712    4,358    7,070    78    289    1,032    422    8,891 

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows

  $(86 4,375     4,289   (653 1,442   2,570     503     8,151    $5,425    7,995    13,420    288    2,629    3,807    465    20,609 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                            

Future cash inflows

  $-    -     -   15,139    -   17,829     -     32,968    $-    -    -    -    -    23,222    -    23,222 

Less:

                            

Future production costs

   -    -     -   8,514    -   10,620     -     19,134     -    -    -    -    -    12,984    -    12,984 

Future development costs

   -    -     -   4,993    -   980     -     5,973     -    -    -    -    -    1,444    -    1,444 

Future income tax provisions

   -    -     -   164    -   1,309     -     1,473     -    -    -    -    -    2,083    -    2,083 

 

 

Future net cash flows

   -    -     -   1,468    -   4,920     -     6,388     -    -    -    -    -    6,711    -    6,711 

10 percent annual discount

   -    -     -   540    -   1,911     -     2,451     -    -    -    -    -    2,316    -    2,316 

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows

  $-    -     -   928    -   3,009     -     3,937    $-    -    -    -    -    4,395    -    4,395 

 

 

Total company

                            

Discounted future net cash flows

  $(86 4,375     4,289   275   1,442   5,579     503     12,088    $5,425    7,995    13,420    288    2,629    8,202    465    25,004 

 

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Alaska Lower
48
   Total
U.S.
   Canada   Europe   Asia Pacific/
Middle East
   Africa   Total    Alaska   
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
 Canada  Europe   
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
   Africa    Total 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

2015

               

2016

2016

 

          

Consolidated operations

                           

Future cash inflows

  $44,054   42,575     86,629     22,317     27,782     19,368     13,875     169,971    $29,697  31,963    61,660  4,739  18,533  12,770    10,715    108,417 

Less:

                           

Future production costs

   32,732   21,638     54,370     13,103     10,574     7,529     1,422     86,998     24,965  16,936    41,901  5,103  7,469  5,288    1,420    61,181 

Future development costs

   9,885   12,967     22,852     6,471     12,793     2,884     437     45,437     7,961  8,932    16,893  1,586  9,949  2,777    537    31,742 

Future income tax provisions

   -   844     844     -     1,506     2,708     10,998     16,056  

Future income tax provisions (benefit)

   —    744    744   —    (325 1,563    7,885    9,867 

 

 

Future net cash flows

   1,437   7,126     8,563     2,743     2,909     6,247     1,018     21,480     (3,229 5,351    2,122  (1,950 1,440  3,142    873    5,627 

10 percent annual discount

   (502 1,573     1,071     1,265     733     1,349     500     4,918     (3,143 976    (2,167 (1,297 (2 572    370    (2,524

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows

  $1,939   5,553     7,492     1,478     2,176     4,898     518     16,562    $(86 4,375    4,289  (653 1,442  2,570    503    8,151 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                           

Future cash inflows

  $-    -     -     36,211     -     34,257     -     70,468    $—     —      —    15,139   —    17,829    —      32,968 

Less:

       ��                   

Future production costs

   -    -     -     16,417     -     17,874     -     34,291     —     —      —    8,514   —    10,620    —      19,134 

Future development costs

   -    -     -     11,869     -     2,391     -     14,260     —     —      —    4,993   —    980    —      5,973 

Future income tax provisions

   -    -     -     1,648     -     3,117     -     4,765     —     —      —    164   —    1,309    —      1,473 

 

 

Future net cash flows

   -    -     -     6,277     -     10,875     -     17,152     —     —      —    1,468   —    4,920    —      6,388 

10 percent annual discount

   -    -     -     3,827     -     4,298     -     8,125     —     —      —    540   —    1,911    —      2,451 

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows

  $-    -     -     2,450     -     6,577     -     9,027    $—     —      —    928   —    3,009    —      3,937 

 

 

Total company

                           

Discounted future net cash flows

  $1,939   5,553     7,492     3,928     2,176     11,475     518     25,589    $(86 4,375    4,289  275  1,442  5,579    503    12,088 

 

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  Alaska   Lower
48
   Total
U.S.
   Canada   Europe   Asia Pacific/
Middle East
   Africa   Other
Areas
   Total    Alaska   
Lower
48
 
 
   
Total
U.S.
 
 
   Canada    Europe    
Asia Pacific/
Middle East
 
 
   Africa    Total 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

2014

                  

2015

2015

 

             

Consolidated operations

                                 

Future cash inflows

  $106,506     100,322     206,828     50,209     55,878     39,492     25,997     -     378,404    $44,054  42,575    86,629    22,317    27,782    19,368    13,875    169,971 

Less:

                                 

Future production costs

   57,924     37,872     95,796     21,342     16,372     12,555     1,338     -     147,403     32,732  21,638    54,370    13,103    10,574    7,529    1,422    86,998 

Future development costs

   10,815     19,666     30,481     10,400     14,194     2,985     437     -     58,497     9,885  12,967    22,852    6,471    12,793    2,884    437    45,437 

Future income tax provisions

   12,483     14,800     27,283     3,159     15,757     7,728     22,526     -     76,453     -  844    844    -    1,506    2,708    10,998    16,056 

 

 

Future net cash flows

   25,284     27,984     53,268     15,308     9,555     16,224     1,696     -     96,051     1,437  7,126    8,563    2,743    2,909    6,247    1,018    21,480 

10 percent annual discount

   12,499     10,150     22,649     8,915     2,741     4,607     791     -     39,703     (502 1,573    1,071    1,265    733    1,349    500    4,918 

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows

  $12,785     17,834     30,619     6,393     6,814     11,617     905     -     56,348    $1,939  5,553    7,492    1,478    2,176    4,898    518    16,562 

 

 

Equity affiliates

                                 

Future cash inflows

  $-     -     -     88,716     -     61,480     -     357     150,553    $-   -    -    36,211    -    34,257    -    70,468 

Less:

                                 

Future production costs

   -     -     -     25,455     -     27,274     -     276     53,005     -   -    -    16,417    -    17,874    -    34,291 

Future development costs

   -     -     -     11,595     -     3,007     -     16     14,618     -   -    -    11,869    -    2,391    -    14,260 

Future income tax provisions

   -     -     -     12,322     -     7,225     -     10     19,557     -   -    -    1,648    -    3,117    -    4,765 

 

 

Future net cash flows

   -     -     -     39,344     -     23,974     -     55     63,373     -   -    -    6,277    -    10,875    -    17,152 

10 percent annual discount

   -     -     -     25,601     -     10,897     -     6     36,504     -   -    -    3,827    -    4,298    -    8,125 

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows

  $-     -     -     13,743     -     13,077     -     49     26,869    $-   -    -    2,450    -    6,577    -    9,027 

 

 

Total company

                                 

Discounted future net cash flows

  $12,785     17,834     30,619     20,136     6,814     24,694     905     49     83,217    $1,939  5,553    7,492    3,928    2,176    11,475    518    25,589 

 

 

Sources of Change in Discounted Future Net Cash Flows

 

   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
   Consolidated Operations      Equity Affiliates      Total Company 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   2016    2015    2014      2016    2015*    2014*      2016    2015*    2014*  
  

 

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows at the beginning of the year

  $16,562    56,348    56,003      9,027    26,869    21,509      25,589    83,217    77,512  

 

 

Changes during the year

              

Revenues less production costs for the year

   (6,313  (8,158  (19,571    (956  (966  (2,748    (7,269  (9,124  (22,319

Net change in prices and production costs

   (16,476  (82,923  (9,243    (9,317  (27,670  4,517      (25,793  (110,593  (4,726

Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less estimated future costs

   1,358    1,791    7,033      (77  319    1,822      1,281    2,110    8,855  

Development costs for the year

   3,118    6,854    11,785      722    1,493    3,453      3,840    8,347    15,238  

Changes in estimated future development costs

   6,646    2,073    (7,771    2,435    (227  (1,613    9,081    1,846    (9,384

Purchases of reserves in place, less estimated future costs

   2    -    -      -    -    5      2    -    5  

Sales of reserves in place, less estimated future costs

   (123  (424  (1,280    -    (38  -      (123  (462  (1,280

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

   (3,252  (1,790  1,348      (436  938    (1,166    (3,688  (852  182  

Accretion of discount

   2,540    9,342    10,045      1,058    3,297    2,648      3,598    12,639    12,693  

Net change in income taxes

   4,089    33,449    7,999      1,481    5,012    (1,558    5,570    38,461    6,441  

 

 

Total changes

   (8,411  (39,786  345      (5,090  (17,842  5,360      (13,501  (57,628  5,705  

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows at year end

  $8,151    16,562    56,348      3,937    9,027    26,869      12,088    25,589    83,217  

 

 
*Certain amounts in equity affiliates were restated to reclassify amounts between “Development costs for the year” and “Changes in estimated future development costs.”
    Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

 
    Consolidated Operations     Equity Affiliates     Total Company 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   2017   2016   2015     2017   2016   2015     2017   2016   2015 
  

 

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows at the beginning of the year

  $8,151   16,562   56,348     3,937   9,027   26,869     12,088   25,589   83,217 

 

 

Changes during the year

              

Revenues less production costs for the year

   (9,844  (6,313  (8,158    (1,341  (956  (966    (11,185  (7,269  (9,124

Net change in prices and production costs

   19,310   (16,476  (82,923    2,750   (9,317  (27,670    22,060   (25,793  (110,593

Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less estimated future costs

   1,445   1,358   1,791     (4  (77  319     1,441   1,281   2,110 

Development costs for the year

   3,653   3,118   6,854     426   722   1,493     4,079   3,840   8,347 

Changes in estimated future development costs

   1,225   6,646   2,073     (64  2,435   (227    1,161   9,081   1,846 

Purchases of reserves in place, less estimated future costs

   -   2   -     -   -   -     -   2   - 

Sales of reserves in place, less estimated future costs

   (855  (123  (424    (786  -   (38    (1,641  (123  (462

Revisions of previous quantity estimates

   2,300   (3,252  (1,790    (648  (436  938     1,652   (3,688  (852

Accretion of discount

   1,313   2,540   9,342     413   1,058   3,297     1,726   3,598   12,639 

Net change in income taxes

   (6,089  4,089   33,449     (288  1,481   5,012     (6,377  5,570   38,461 

 

 

Total changes

   12,458   (8,411  (39,786    458   (5,090  (17,842    12,916   (13,501  (57,628

 

 

Discounted future net cash flows at year end

  $20,609   8,151   16,562     4,395   3,937   9,027     25,004   12,088   25,589 

 

 

 

The net change in prices and production costs is thebeginning-of-year reserve-production forecast multiplied by the net annual change in theper-unit sales price and production cost, discounted at 10 percent.

 

Purchases and sales of reserves in place, along with extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, are calculated using production forecasts of the applicable reserve quantities for the year multiplied by the12-month average sales prices, less future estimated costs, discounted at 10 percent.

 

Revisions of previous quantity estimates are calculated using production forecast changes for the year, including changes in the timing of production, multiplied by the12-month average sales prices, less future estimated costs, discounted at 10 percent.

 

The accretion of discount is 10 percent of the prior year’s discounted future cash inflows, less future production and development costs.

 

The net change in income taxes is the annual change in the discounted future income tax provisions.

 

Selected Quarterly Financial Data(Unaudited)

 

  Millions of Dollars     Per Share of Common Stock   Millions of Dollars     Per Share of Common Stock 
   
 
 
 
Sales and
Other
Operating
Revenues
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Income (Loss)
From Continuing
Operations Before
Income Taxes
  
  
  
  
     
 
 
Net
Income
(Loss)
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Net Income
(Loss)
Attributable to
ConocoPhillips
  
  
  
  
     

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

Attributable

to ConocoPhillips

  

  

  

   


Sales and
Other
Operating

Revenues

 
 
 

 

   

Income (Loss)
Before

Income Taxes

 

 

     

Net
Income

(Loss)

 
 

 

   


Net Income
(Loss)
Attributable to

ConocoPhillips

 
 
 

 

     

Net Income (Loss)

Attributable

to ConocoPhillips

 

 

 

             Basic      Diluted 
  

 

 

     

 

 

 

2017

                  

First

  $7,518     (232)      599     586       0.47       0.47  

Second

   6,781     (4,361)      (3,426)    (3,440)      (2.78)      (2.78) 

Third

   6,688     653       436     420       0.35       0.34  

Fourth

   8,119     1,325       1,598     1,579       1.32       1.32  
 
 
 
 
Sales and
Other
Operating
Revenues
  
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Income (Loss)
From Continuing
Operations Before
Income Taxes
  
  
  
  
     
 
 
Net
Income
(Loss)
  
  
  
   
 
 
 
Net Income
(Loss)
Attributable to
ConocoPhillips
  
  
  
  
     Basic       Diluted  

 
  

 

    

 

 

 

2016

                                    

First

  $5,121     (2,224)       (1,456)     (1,469)       (1.18)       (1.18)    $5,121     (2,224)      (1,456)    (1,469)      (1.18)      (1.18) 

Second

   5,348     (1,644)       (1,058)     (1,071)       (0.86)       (0.86)     5,348     (1,644)      (1,058)    (1,071)      (0.86)      (0.86) 

Third

   6,415     (1,654)       (1,026)     (1,040)       (0.84)       (0.84)     6,415     (1,654)      (1,026)    (1,040)      (0.84)      (0.84) 

Fourth

   6,809     (8)       (19)     (35)       (0.03)       (0.03)     6,809     (8)      (19)    (35)      (0.03)      (0.03) 

 

 

2015

                  

First

  $7,716     (356)       286      272        0.22        0.22   

Second

   8,293     (91)       (164)     (179)       (0.15)       (0.15)  

Third

   7,262     (1,741)       (1,056)     (1,071)       (0.87)       (0.87)  

Fourth

   6,293     (5,051)       (3,437)     (3,450)       (2.78)       (2.78)  

 

For additional information on the commodity price environment, see the Business Environment and Executive Overview section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Supplementary Information—Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

We have various cross guarantees among ConocoPhillips, ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I, with respect to publicly held debt securities. ConocoPhillips Company is 100 percent owned by ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I is an indirect, 100 percent owned subsidiary of ConocoPhillips Company. ConocoPhillips and ConocoPhillips Company have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment obligations of ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I, with respect to their publicly held debt securities. Similarly, ConocoPhillips has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment obligations of ConocoPhillips Company with respect to its publicly held debt securities. In addition, ConocoPhillips Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment obligations of ConocoPhillips with respect to its publicly held debt securities. All guarantees are joint and several. The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for:

 

ConocoPhillips, ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I (in each case, reflecting investments in subsidiaries utilizing the equity method of accounting).
All other nonguarantor subsidiaries of ConocoPhillips.
The consolidating adjustments necessary to present ConocoPhillips’ results on a consolidated basis.

In May 2014, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the SEC under which ConocoPhillips, as a well-known seasoned issuer, has the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities, with certain debt securities guaranteed by ConocoPhillips Company. Also as part of that registration statement, ConocoPhillips Trust I and ConocoPhillips Trust II have the ability to issue and sell preferred trust securities, guaranteed by ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips Trust I and ConocoPhillips Trust II have not issued any trust-preferred securities under this registration statement, and thus have no assets or liabilities. Accordingly, columns for these two trusts are not included in the condensed consolidating financial information.

In 2014, ConocoPhillips received $34.5 billion in dividends from ConocoPhillips Company to settle certain accumulated intercompany balances. This consisted of a $17.5 billion distribution of earnings and a $17 billion return of capital. These transactions had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2015, ConocoPhillips received a $3.5 billion return of capital from ConocoPhillips Company to settle certain accumulated intercompany balances. The transaction had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2016, ConocoPhillips received a $2.3 billion return of capital from ConocoPhillips Company to settle certain accumulated intercompany balances. The transaction had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2016, ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I repaid $1.25 billion of external debt. This transaction iswas reflected in the full-year 2016 condensed consolidating financial statements.

In 2017, ConocoPhillips Company received a $9.8 billion return of capital from a nonguarantor subsidiary to settle certain accumulated intercompany balances. The transaction had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2017, ConocoPhillips received a $5.0 billion return of capital from ConocoPhillips Company to settle certain accumulated intercompany balances. The transaction had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2017, ConocoPhillips received a $3.0 billion distribution from ConocoPhillips Company to settle certain accumulated intercompany balances. This consisted of a $2.8 billion return of capital and a $0.2 billion return of earnings. This transaction had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In 2017, ConocoPhillips Company received a $1.4 billion loan repayment from a nonguarantor subsidiary to settle certain accumulated intercompany balances. This transaction had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

This condensed consolidating financial information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes.

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Year Ended December 31, 2016     Year Ended December 31, 2017 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income Statement

   ConocoPhillips     
 
ConocoPhillips
Company
  
  
   
 
 
ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
  
  
  
   
 
All Other
Subsidiaries
  
  
   
 
Consolidating
Adjustments
  
  
   
 
Total
Consolidated
  
  
   ConocoPhillips    
ConocoPhillips
Company
 
 
   

ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
 
 
 
   
All Other
Subsidiaries
 
 
   
Consolidating
Adjustments
 
 
   
Total
Consolidated
 
 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Revenues and Other Income

                        

Sales and other operating revenues

  $-     10,352     -     13,341     -     23,693    $-    12,433    -    16,673    -    29,106 

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

   (3,351)     (1,051)     -     (91)     4,545     52     (454)    2,047    -    630    (1,451)    772 

Gain on dispositions

   -     120     -     240     -     360     -    916    -    1,261    -    2,177 

Other income (loss)

   1     (11)     -     265     -     255  

Other income

   2    35    -    492    -    529 

Intercompany revenues

   88     277     220     3,036     (3,621)     -     48    291    170    3,405    (3,914)    - 

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

   (3,262)     9,687     220     16,791     924     24,360     (404)    15,722    170    22,461    (5,365)    32,584 

 

 

Costs and Expenses

                        

Purchased commodities

   -     9,144     -     3,562     (2,712)     9,994     -    11,145    -    4,580    (3,250)    12,475 

Production and operating expenses

   -     779     -     5,131     (243)     5,667     -    832    -    4,358    (17)    5,173 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   8     581     -     140     (6)     723     9    476    -    82    (6)    561 

Exploration expenses

   -     1,231     -     684     -     1,915     -    544    -    394    -    938 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -     1,178     -     7,884     -     9,062     -    855    -    5,990    -    6,845 

Impairments

   -     67     -     72     -     139     -    1,159    -    5,442    -    6,601 

Taxes other than income taxes

   -     162     -     577     -     739     -    140    -    669    -    809 

Accretion on discounted liabilities

   -     46     -     379     -     425     -    32    -    330    -    362 

Interest and debt expense

   506     622     207     570     (660)     1,245     420    664    147    508    (641)    1,098 

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

   (19)     2     174     (176)     -     (19)     (43)    11    156    (89)    -    35 

Other expense

   267    35    -    -    -    302 

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

   495     13,812     381     18,823     (3,621)     29,890     653    15,893    303    22,264    (3,914)    35,199 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

   (3,757)     (4,125)     (161)     (2,032)     4,545     (5,530)  

Income tax benefit

   (142)     (774)     (9)     (1,046)     -     (1,971)  

Income (Loss) before income taxes

   (1,057)    (171)    (133)    197    (1,451)    (2,615) 

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (202)    283    7    (1,910)    -    (1,822) 

 

 

Net loss

   (3,615)     (3,351)     (152)     (986)     4,545     (3,559)  

Net income (loss)

   (855)    (454)    (140)    2,107    (1,451)    (793) 

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   -     -     -     (56)     -     (56)     -    -    -    (62)    -    (62) 

 

 

Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(3,615)     (3,351)     (152)     (1,042)     4,545     (3,615)  

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(855)    (454)    (140)    2,045    (1,451)    (855) 

 

 

Comprehensive Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(3,561)     (3,297)     (27)     (952)     4,276     (3,561)  

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(180)    221    23    2,703    (2,947)    (180) 

 

 

Income Statement

   Year Ended December 31, 2015     Year Ended December 31, 2016 

Revenues and Other Income

                        

Sales and other operating revenues

  $-     11,473     -     18,091     -     29,564    $-    10,352    -    13,341    -    23,693 

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

   (4,081)     (1,950)     -     1,364     5,322     655     (3,351)    (1,051)    -    (91)    4,545    52 

Gain on dispositions

   -     332     -     259     -     591     -    120    -    240    -    360 

Other income

   -     12     -     113     -     125     1    (11)    -    265    -    255 

Intercompany revenues

   74     341     246     3,365     (4,026)     -     88    277    220    3,036    (3,621)    - 

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

   (4,007)     10,208     246     23,192     1,296     30,935     (3,262)    9,687    220    16,791    924    24,360 

 

 

Costs and Expenses

                        

Purchased commodities

   -     9,905     -     5,838     (3,317)     12,426     -    9,144    -    3,562    (2,712)    9,994 

Production and operating expenses

   -     1,469     -     5,585     (38)     7,016     -    779    -    5,131    (243)    5,667 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   9     744     1     209     (10)     953     8    581    -    140    (6)    723 

Exploration expenses

   -     2,093     -     2,099     -     4,192     -    1,231    -    684    -    1,915 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -     1,201     -     7,912     -     9,113     -    1,178    -    7,884    -    9,062 

Impairments

   -     15     -     2,230     -     2,245     -    67    -    72    -    139 

Taxes other than income taxes

   -     173     -     728     -     901     -    162    -    577    -    739 

Accretion on discounted liabilities

   -     58     -     425     -     483     -    46    -    379    -    425 

Interest and debt expense

   485     423      226     447     (661)     920     506    622     207    570    (660)    1,245 

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

   114     1     (708)     518     -     (75)     (19)    2    174    (176)    -    (19) 

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

   608     16,082     (481)     25,991     (4,026)     38,174     495    13,812    381    18,823    (3,621)    29,890 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

   (4,615)     (5,874)     727     (2,799)     5,322     (7,239)  

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (187)     (1,793)     21     (909)     -     (2,868)  

Loss before income taxes

   (3,757)    (4,125)    (161)    (2,032)    4,545    (5,530) 

Income tax benefit

   (142)    (774)    (9)    (1,046)    -    (1,971) 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   (4,428)     (4,081)     706     (1,890)     5,322     (4,371)  

Net loss

   (3,615)    (3,351)    (152)    (986)    4,545    (3,559) 

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   -     -     -     (57)     -     (57)     -    -    -    (56)    -    (56) 

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(4,428)     (4,081)     706     (1,947)     5,322     (4,428)  

Net Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(3,615)    (3,351)    (152)    (1,042)    4,545    (3,615) 

 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(8,773)     (8,426)     71     (6,705)     15,060     (8,773)  

Comprehensive Loss Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(3,561)    (3,297)    (27)    (952)    4,276    (3,561) 

 

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Year Ended December 31, 2014    Year Ended December 31, 2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income Statement

   ConocoPhillips    
 
ConocoPhillips
Company
  
  
  
 
 
ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
  
  
  
  
 
All Other
Subsidiaries
  
  
  
 
Consolidating
Adjustments
  
  
  
 
Total
Consolidated
  
  
   ConocoPhillips   
ConocoPhillips
Company
 
 
  

ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
 
 
 
  
All Other
Subsidiaries
 
 
  
Consolidating
Adjustments
 
 
  
Total
Consolidated
 
 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Revenues and Other Income

              

Sales and other operating revenues

  $-   20,083    -   32,441    -   52,524    $-  11,473   -  18,091   -  29,564 

Equity in earnings of affiliates

   6,108   8,090    -   2,932   (14,601 2,529  

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

   (4,081 (1,950  -  1,364  5,322  655 

Gain on dispositions

   -   9    -   89    -   98     -  332   -  259   -  591 

Other income (loss)

   (6 67    -   305    -   366  

Other income

   -  12   -  113   -  125 

Intercompany revenues

   79   465   283   5,883   (6,710  -     74  341  246  3,365  (4,026  - 

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

   6,181   28,714   283   41,650   (21,311 55,517     (4,007 10,208  246  23,192  1,296  30,935 

 

 

Costs and Expenses

              

Purchased commodities

   -   17,591    -   10,415   (5,907 22,099     -  9,905   -  5,838  (3,317 12,426 

Production and operating expenses

   -   2,600    -   6,368   (59 8,909     -  1,469   -  5,585  (38 7,016 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   9   575   1   166   (16 735     9  744  1  209  (10 953 

Exploration expenses

   -   1,036    -   1,009    -   2,045     -  2,093   -  2,099   -  4,192 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

   -   1,059    -   7,270    -   8,329     -  1,201   -  7,912   -  9,113 

Impairments

   -   127    -   729    -   856     -  15   -  2,230   -  2,245 

Taxes other than income taxes

   -   285    -   1,803    -   2,088     -  173   -  728   -  901 

Accretion on discounted liabilities

   -   58    -   426    -   484     -  58   -  425   -  483 

Interest and debt expense

   571   299   231   275   (728 648     485  423  226  447  (661 920 

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

   62   10   (372 234    -   (66   114  1  (708 518   -  (75

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

   642   23,640   (140 28,695   (6,710 46,127     608  16,082  (481 25,991  (4,026 38,174 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   5,539   5,074   423   12,955   (14,601 9,390  

Income (loss) before income taxes

   (4,615 (5,874 727  (2,799 5,322  (7,239

Income tax provision (benefit)

   (199 (1,034 19   4,797    -   3,583     (187 (1,793 21  (909  -  (2,868

 

 

Income From Continuing Operations

   5,738   6,108   404   8,158   (14,601 5,807  

Income from discontinued operations

   1,131   1,131    -   113   (1,244 1,131  

 

Net income

   6,869   7,239   404   8,271   (15,845 6,938  

Net income (loss)

   (4,428 (4,081 706  (1,890 5,322  (4,371

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

   -    -    -   (69  -   (69   -   -   -  (57  -  (57

 

 

Net Income Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $6,869   7,239   404   8,202   (15,845 6,869  

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(4,428 (4,081 706  (1,947 5,322  (4,428

 

 

Comprehensive Income Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $2,965   3,335   58   4,589   (7,982 2,965  

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

  $(8,773 (8,426 71  (6,705 15,060  (8,773

 

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   At December 31, 2017 
  

 

 

 

Balance Sheet

   ConocoPhillips   
ConocoPhillips
Company
 
 
   

ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
 
 
 
  
All Other
Subsidiaries
 
 
   
Consolidating
Adjustments
 
 
  
Total
Consolidated
 
 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Assets

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $-  234    4  6,087    -  6,325 

Short-term investments

   -   -    -  1,873    -  1,873 

Accounts and notes receivable

   24  2,255    35  4,870    (2,864 4,320 

Investment in Cenovus Energy

   -  1,899    -   -    -  1,899 

Inventories

   -  163    -  897    -  1,060 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   1  278    6  779    (29 1,035 

 

Total Current Assets

   25  4,829    45  14,506    (2,893 16,512 

Investments, loans and long-term receivables*

   29,400  47,974    2,533  15,050    (84,897 10,060 

Net properties, plants and equipment

   -  4,230    -  41,930    (477 45,683 

Other assets

   15  1,146    186  1,302    (1,542 1,107 

 

Total Assets

  $29,440  58,179    2,764  72,788    (89,809 73,362 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

         

Accounts payable

  $-  3,094    1  3,799    (2,864 4,030 

Short-term debt

   (5 2,505    7  77    (9 2,575 

Accrued income and other taxes

   -  107    -  931    -  1,038 

Employee benefit obligations

   -  554    -  171    -  725 

Other accruals

   85  314    48  612    (30 1,029 

 

Total Current Liabilities

   80  6,574    56  5,590    (2,903 9,397 

Long-term debt

   3,787  9,321    1,703  2,794    (477 17,128 

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

   -  432    -  7,199    -  7,631 

Deferred income taxes

   -   -    -  6,263    (981 5,282 

Employee benefit obligations

   -  1,335    -  519    -  1,854 

Other liabilities and deferred credits*

   1,528  5,229    926  9,215    (15,629 1,269 

 

Total Liabilities

   5,395  22,891    2,685  31,580    (19,990 42,561 

Retained earnings

   22,867  13,317    (681 11,958    (18,070 29,391 

Other common stockholders’ equity

   1,178  21,971    760  29,056    (51,749 1,216 

Noncontrolling interests

   -   -    -  194    -  194 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

  $29,440  58,179    2,764  72,788    (89,809 73,362 
   At December 31, 2016  

 
  

 

 

 

Balance Sheet

   ConocoPhillips    
 
ConocoPhillips
Company
  
  
   
 
 
ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
  
  
  
  
 
All Other
Subsidiaries
  
  
   
 
Consolidating
Adjustments
  
  
  
 
Total
Consolidated
  
  
   At December 31, 2016 
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

Assets

                  

Cash and cash equivalents

  $-   358     13   3,239     -   3,610    $-  358    13  3,239    -  3,610 

Short-term investments

   -    -     -   50     -   50     -   -    -  50    -  50 

Accounts and notes receivable

   22   1,968     23   6,103     (4,702 3,414     22  1,968    23  6,103    (4,702 3,414 

Inventories

   -   84     -   934     -   1,018     -  84    -  934    -  1,018 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   2   116     8   415     (24 517     2  116    8  415    (24 517 

 

 

Total Current Assets

   24   2,526     44   10,741     (4,726 8,609     24  2,526    44  10,741    (4,726 8,609 

Investments, loans and long-term receivables*

   37,901   64,434     2,296   31,643     (114,602 21,672     37,901  64,434    2,296  31,643    (114,602 21,672 

Net properties, plants and equipment

   -   6,301     -   52,030     -   58,331     -  6,301    -  52,030    -  58,331 

Other assets

   40   2,194     220   1,240     (2,534 1,160     40  2,194    220  1,240    (2,534 1,160 

 

 

Total Assets

  $37,965   75,455     2,560   95,654     (121,862 89,772    $37,965  75,455    2,560  95,654    (121,862 89,772 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

                  

Accounts payable

  $-   4,683     1   3,671     (4,702 3,653    $-  4,683    1  3,671    (4,702 3,653 

Short-term debt

   (10 999     6   94     -   1,089     (10 999    6  94    -  1,089 

Accrued income and other taxes

   -   85     -   399     -   484     -  85    -  399    -  484 

Employee benefit obligations

   -   489     -   200     -   689     -  489    -  200    -  689 

Other accruals

   171   271     40   536     (24 994     171  271    40  536    (24 994 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

   161   6,527     47   4,900     (4,726 6,909     161  6,527    47  4,900    (4,726 6,909 

Long-term debt

   8,975   12,635     1,710   2,866     -   26,186     8,975  12,635    1,710  2,866    -  26,186 

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

   -   925     -   7,500     -   8,425     -  925    -  7,500    -  8,425 

Deferred income taxes

   -    -     -   10,972     (2,023 8,949     -   -    -  10,972    (2,023 8,949 

Employee benefit obligations

   -   1,901     -   651     -   2,552     -  1,901    -  651    -  2,552 

Other liabilities and deferred credits*

   417   10,391     748   17,832     (27,863 1,525     417  10,391    748  17,832    (27,863 1,525 

 

 

Total Liabilities

   9,553   32,379     2,505   44,721     (34,612 54,546     9,553  32,379    2,505  44,721    (34,612 54,546 

Retained earnings

   25,025   14,015     (541 12,883     (19,834 31,548     25,025  14,015    (541 12,883    (19,834 31,548 

Other common stockholders’ equity

   3,387   29,061     596   37,798     (67,416 3,426     3,387  29,061    596  37,798    (67,416 3,426 

Noncontrolling interests

   -    -     -   252     -   252     -   -    -  252    -  252 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

  $37,965   75,455     2,560   95,654     (121,862 89,772    $37,965  75,455    2,560  95,654    (121,862 89,772 

 

 

Balance Sheet

   At December 31, 2015  
  

 

 

 

Assets

         

Cash and cash equivalents

  $-   4     15   2,349     -   2,368  

Accounts and notes receivable

   21   2,905     21   7,228     (5,661 4,514  

Inventories

   -   142     -   982     -   1,124  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   2   206     252   589     (266 783  

 

Total Current Assets

   23   3,257     288   11,148     (5,927 8,789  

Investments, loans and long-term receivables*

   43,532   64,015     3,264   27,839     (117,464 21,186  

Net properties, plants and equipment

   -   8,110     -   58,336     -   66,446  

Other assets

   7   950     233   1,158     (1,285 1,063  

 

Total Assets

  $43,562   76,332     3,785   98,481     (124,676 97,484  

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

         

Accounts payable

  $-   5,684     13   4,897     (5,661 4,933  

Short-term debt

   (9 1     1,255   180     -   1,427  

Accrued income and other taxes

   -   62     -   437     -   499  

Employee benefit obligations

   -   629     -   258     -   887  

Other accruals

   170   465     52   1,087     (264 1,510  

 

Total Current Liabilities

   161   6,841     1,320   6,859     (5,925 9,256  

Long-term debt

   7,518   10,660     1,716   3,559     -   23,453  

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

   -   1,107     -   8,473     -   9,580  

Deferred income taxes

   -    -     -   11,814     (815 10,999  

Employee benefit obligations

   -   1,760     -   526     -   2,286  

Other liabilities and deferred credits*

   2,681   7,291     667   15,181     (23,992 1,828  

 

Total Liabilities

   10,360   27,659     3,703   46,412     (30,732 57,402  

Retained earnings

   29,892   17,366     (389 15,177     (25,632 36,414  

Other common stockholders’ equity

   3,310   31,307     471   36,572     (68,312 3,348  

Noncontrolling interests

   -    -     -   320     -   320  

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

  $43,562   76,332     3,785   98,481     (124,676 97,484  

 

*Includes intercompany loans.

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Statement of Cash Flows  Year Ended December 31, 2016   Year Ended December 31, 2017 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   ConocoPhillips     
 
ConocoPhillips
Company
  
  
   
 
 
ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
  
  
  
   
 
All Other
Subsidiaries
  
  
   
 
Consolidating
Adjustments
  
  
   
 
Total
Consolidated
  
  
   ConocoPhillips    
ConocoPhillips
Company
 
 
   

ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
 
 
 
   
All Other
Subsidiaries
 
 
   
Consolidating
Adjustments
 
 
   
Total
Consolidated
 
 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

                        

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

  $(306)     (322)     (2)     5,903     (870)     4,403    $71    1,183    (74)    8,931    (3,034)    7,077 

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

                        

Capital expenditures and investments

   -     (989)     -     (4,281)     401     (4,869)     -    (1,663)    -    (3,795)    867    (4,591) 

Working capital changes associated with investing activities

   -     (126)     -     (205)     -     (331)     -    194    -    (62)    -    132 

Proceeds from asset dispositions

   2,300     266     -     1,114     (2,394)     1,286     7,765    11,146    -    12,796    (17,847)    13,860 

Net sales of short-term investments

   -     -     -     (51)     -     (51)  

Net purchases of short-term investments

   -    -    -    (1,790)    -    (1,790) 

Long-term advances/loans—related parties

   -     (812)     -     -     812     -     -    (214)    -    (85)    299    - 

Collection of advances/loans—related parties

   -     391     1,250     272     (1,805)     108     658    1,527    -    2,196    (4,266)    115 

Intercompany cash management

   (2,214)     1,433     -     781     -     -     1,151    101    -    (1,252)    -    - 

Other

   -     1     -     (3)     -     (2)     -    (8)    -    44    -    36 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

   86     164     1,250     (2,373)     (2,986)     (3,859)  

Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities

   9,574    11,083    -    8,052    (20,947)    7,762 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

                        

Issuance of debt

   1,600     2,994     -     812     (812)     4,594     -    20    65    214    (299)    - 

Repayment of debt

   (150)     (164)     (1,250)     (2,492)     1,805     (2,251)     (5,459)    (4,411)    -    (2,272)    4,266    (7,876) 

Issuance of company common stock

   148     -     -     -     (211)     (63)     115    -    -    -    (178)    (63) 

Repurchase of company common stock

   (126)     -     -     -     -     (126)     (3,000)    -    -    -    -    (3,000) 

Dividends paid

   (1,253)     -     -     (1,081)     1,081     (1,253)     (1,305)    (235)    -    (2,977)    3,212    (1,305) 

Other

   1     (2,315)     -     184     1,993     (137)     4    (7,765)    -    (9,331)    16,980    (112) 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

   220     515     (1,250)     (2,577)     3,856     764     (9,645)    (12,391)    65    (14,366)    23,981    (12,356) 

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents

   -     (3)     -     (63)     -     (66)     -    1    -    231    -    232 

 

 

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

   -     354     (2)     890     -     1,242     -    (124)    (9)    2,848    -    2,715 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   -     4     15     2,349     -     2,368     -    358    13    3,239    -    3,610 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $-     358     13     3,239     -     3,610    $-    234    4    6,087    -    6,325 

 

 

Statement of Cash Flows

   Year Ended December 31, 2015     Year Ended December 31, 2016 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

                        

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

   (225)     245     9     7,519     24     7,572    $(306)    (322)    (2)    5,903    (870)    4,403 

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

                        

Capital expenditures and investments

   -     (3,064)     -     (8,386)     1,400     (10,050)     -    (989)    -    (4,281)    401    (4,869) 

Working capital changes associated with investing activities

   -     (4)     -     (964)     -     (968)     -    (126)    -    (205)    -    (331) 

Proceeds from asset dispositions

   3,500     826     -     1,225     (3,599)     1,952     2,300    266    -    1,114    (2,394)    1,286 

Net purchases of short-term investments

   -    -    -    (51)    -    (51) 

Long-term advances/loans—related parties

   -     (278)     -     (2,245)     2,523     -     -    (812)    -    -    812    - 

Collection of advances/loans—related parties

   -     -     -     205     (100)     105  

Collection of advances/loans���related parties

   -    391    1,250    272    (1,805)    108 

Intercompany cash management

   102     46     -     (148)     -     -     (2,214)    1,433    -    781    -    - 

Other

   -     304     -     1     1     306     -    1    -    (3)    -    (2) 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

   3,602     (2,170)     -     (10,312)     225     (8,655)     86    164    1,250    (2,373)    (2,986)    (3,859) 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

                        

Issuance of debt

   -     4,743     -     278     (2,523)     2,498     1,600    2,994    -    812    (812)    4,594 

Repayment of debt

   -     (100)     -     (103)     100     (103)     (150)    (164)    (1,250)    (2,492)    1,805    (2,251) 

Issuance of company common stock

   283     -     -     (2)     (363)     (82)     148    -    -    -    (211)    (63) 

Repurchase of company common stock

   (126)    -    -    -    -    (126) 

Dividends paid

   (3,664)     -     -     (339)     339     (3,664)     (1,253)    -    -    (1,081)    1,081    (1,253) 

Other

   4     (3,484)     -     1,204     2,198     (78)     1    (2,315)    -    184    1,993    (137) 

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

   (3,377)     1,159     -     1,038     (249)     (1,429)     220    515    (1,250)    (2,577)    3,856    764 

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents

   -     -     (1)     (181)     -     (182)     -    (3)    -    (63)    -    (66) 

 

 

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

   -     (766)     8     (1,936)     -     (2,694)     -    354    (2)    890    -    1,242 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   -     770     7     4,285     -     5,062     -    4    15    2,349    -    2,368 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $-     4     15     2,349     -     2,368    $-    358    13    3,239    -    3,610 

 

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
Statement of Cash Flows  Year Ended December 31, 2014   Year Ended December 31, 2015 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   ConocoPhillips     
 
ConocoPhillips
Company
  
  
   
 
 
ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
  
  
  
   
 
All Other
Subsidiaries
  
  
   
 
Consolidating
Adjustments
  
  
   
 
Total
Consolidated
  
  
   ConocoPhillips    
ConocoPhillips
Company
 
 
   

ConocoPhillips
Canada Funding
Company I
 
 
 
   
All Other
Subsidiaries
 
 
   
Consolidating
Adjustments
 
 
   
Total
Consolidated
 
 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

                        

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating activities

  $17,259     2,948     27     16,941     (20,763)     16,412  

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

   -     202     -     408     (453)     157  

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

   17,259     3,150     27     17,349     (21,216)     16,569    $(225)    245    9    7,519    24    7,572 

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

                        

Capital expenditures and investments

   -     (6,507)     -     (14,840)     4,262     (17,085)     -    (3,064)    -    (8,386)    1,400    (10,050) 

Working capital changes associated with investing activities

   -     17     -     163     -     180     -    (4)    -    (964)    -    (968) 

Proceeds from asset dispositions

   16,912     1,588     -     253     (17,150)     1,603     3,500    826    -    1,225    (3,599)    1,952 

Net purchases of short-term investments

   -     -     -     253     -     253  

Long-term advances/loans—related parties

   -     (736)     (241)     (7)     984     -     -    (278)    -    (2,245)    2,523    - 

Collection of advances/loans—related parties

   -     593     -     112     (102)     603     -    -    -    205    (100)    105 

Intercompany cash management

   (29,113)     31,993     -     (2,880)     -     -     102    46    -    (148)    -    - 

Other

   -     (415)     -     (31)     -     (446)     -    304    -    1    1    306 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing activities

   (12,201)     26,533     (241)     (16,977)     (12,006)     (14,892)  

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

   -     133     -     (73)     (133)     (73)  

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

   (12,201)     26,666     (241)     (17,050)     (12,139)     (14,965)     3,602    (2,170)    -    (10,312)    225    (8,655) 

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

                        

Issuance of debt

   -     2,994     -     984     (984)     2,994     -    4,743    -    278    (2,523)    2,498 

Repayment of debt

   (1,909)     (16)     -     (191)     102     (2,014)     -    (100)    -    (103)    100    (103) 

Issuance of company common stock

   377     -     -     -     (342)     35     283    -    -    (2)    (363)    (82) 

Dividends paid

   (3,525)     (17,588)     -     (3,768)     21,356     (3,525)     (3,664)    -    -    (339)    339    (3,664) 

Other

   (1)     (16,870)     -     3,919     12,888     (64)     4    (3,484)    -    1,204    2,198    (78) 

 

 

Net cash used in continuing financing activities

   (5,058)     (31,480)     -     944     33,020     (2,574)  

Net cash used in discontinued operations

   -     -     -     (335)     335     -  

 

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

   (5,058)     (31,480)     -     609     33,355     (2,574)  

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

   (3,377)    1,159    -    1,038    (249)    (1,429) 

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents

   -     -     (8)     (206)     -     (214)     -    -    (1)    (181)    -    (182) 

 

 

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

   -     (1,664)     (222)     702     -     (1,184)     -    (766)    8    (1,936)    -    (2,694) 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   -     2,434     229     3,583     -     6,246     -    770    7    4,285    -    5,062 

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

  $-     770     7     4,285     -     5,062    $-    4    15    2,349    -    2,368 

 

 

Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

 

Item 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of December 31, 2016,2017, with the participation of our management, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and our Executive Vice President, Finance, Commercial and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) carried out an evaluation, pursuant to Rule13a-15(b) of the Act, of ConocoPhillips’ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule13a-15(e) of the Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Finance, Commercial and Chief Financial Officer concluded our disclosure controls and procedures were operating effectively as of December 31, 2016.2017.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined inRule 13a-15(f) of the Act, in the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

This report is included in Item 8 on page 7876 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

This report is included in Item 8 on page 8078 and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

 

Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information regarding our executive officers appears in Part I of this report on pages 29 and 30.page 26.

Code of Business Ethics and Conduct for Directors and Employees

We have a Code of Business Ethics and Conduct for Directors and Employees (Code of Ethics), including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. We have posted a copy of our Code of Ethics on the “Corporate Governance” section of our internet website atwww.conocophillips.com (within the Investors>Corporate Governance section). Any waivers of the Code of Ethics must be approved, in advance, by our full Board of Directors. Any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics that apply to our executive officers and directors will be posted on the “Corporate Governance” section of our internet website.

All other information required by Item 10 of Part III will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or before April 29, 2017,30, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference.*

 

Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by Item 11 of Part III will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or before April 29, 2017,30, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference.*

 

Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by Item 12 of Part III will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or before April 29, 2017,30, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference.*

 

Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by Item 13 of Part III will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or before April 29, 2017,30, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference.*

 

Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by Item 14 of Part III will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20172018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A on or before April 29, 2017,30, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference.*

 

*Except for information or data specifically incorporated herein by reference under Items 10 through 14, other information and data appearing in our 20172018 Proxy Statement are not deemed to be a part of this Annual Report onForm 10-K or deemed to be filed with the Commission as a part of this report.

PART IV

 

Item 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a)    1.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements and supplementary information listed in the Index to Financial Statements, which appears on page 77,75, are filed as part of this annual report.

 

 2.Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, appears below. All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, not significant, not applicable or the information is shown in another schedule, the financial statements or the notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 3.Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits, which appears on pages 180177 through 188,187, are filed as part of this annual report.

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (Consolidated)

ConocoPhillips

 

  Millions of Dollars   Millions of Dollars 

Description

   
 
Balance at
January 1
  
  
   
 
Charged to
Expense
  
  
   Other(a)  Deductions    
 
Balance at
December 31
  
  
   

Balance at

January 1

 

 

   
Charged to
Expense
 
 
  Other(a)    Deductions   
Balance at
December 31
 
 

2017

        

Deducted from asset accounts:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable

  $5    2   -    (3)(b)   4 

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

   675    560(c)   19    -   1,254 

Included in other liabilities:

        

Restructuring accruals

   80    65   1    (93)(d)   53 

 

 

2016

                

Deducted from asset accounts:

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable

  $7     3     (1)    (4)(b)   5    $7    3  (1)    (4)(b)  5 

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

   734     (31)     (12)    (16)    675     734    (31)  (12)    (16 675 

Included in other liabilities:

                

Restructuring accruals

   156     129     1    (206)(c)   80     156    129  1    (206)(d)  80 

 

2015

                

Deducted from asset accounts:

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable

  $5     4     (2)   (b)  7    $5    4  (2)    (b)  7 

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

   970     6     (21)   (221)   734     970    6  (21)    (221 734 

Included in other liabilities:

                

Restructuring accruals

   61     303     (8)   (200)(c)  156     61    303  (8)    (200)(d)  156 

 

2014

        

Deducted from asset accounts:

        

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable

  $8     -     (2)   (1)(b)  5  

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

   969     127     (26)   (100)   970  

Included in other liabilities:

        

Restructuring accruals

   19     71     (6)   (23)(c)  61  

 

(a)Represents acquisitions/dispositions/revisions and the effect of translating foreign financial statements.

(b)Amounts charged off less recoveries of amounts previously charged off.

(c)Includes an adjustment to the U.S. tax basis due to U.S. Tax Legislation.

(d)Benefit payments.

CONOCOPHILLIPS

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

Number

  Description
2.1  Separation and Distribution Agreement Between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April  26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on May 1, 2012;
FileNo. 001-32395).
2.2†‡Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated March  29, 2017, by and among ConocoPhillips Company, ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp., ConocoPhillips Canada Energy Partnership, ConocoPhillips Western Canada Partnership, ConocoPhillips Canada (BRC) Partnership, ConocoPhillips Canada E&P ULC, and Cenovus Energy Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 filed by ConocoPhillips on May 4, 2017).
2.3†‡Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement Amending Agreement, dated as of May  16, 2017, by and among ConocoPhillips Company, ConocoPhillips Canada Resources Corp., ConocoPhillips Canada Energy Partnership, ConocoPhillips Western Canada Partnership, ConocoPhillips Canada (BRC) Partnership, ConocoPhillips Canada E&P ULC, and Cenovus Energy Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on May 18, 2017; FileNo. 001-32395).
3.1  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008; FileNo. 001-32395).
3.2  Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on August 30, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
3.3  Amended and RestatedBy-Laws of ConocoPhillips, as amended and restated as of December 6, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed December 10, 2013; File No. 001-32395).
3.4Amended and Restated By-Laws of ConocoPhillips, as amended and restated as of October  9, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on October 13, 2015; FileNo. 001-32395).
  ConocoPhillips and its subsidiaries are parties to several debt instruments under which the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of ConocoPhillips and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Pursuant to paragraph 4(iii)(A) of Item 601(b) of RegulationS-K, ConocoPhillips agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the SEC upon request.
10.1  1986 Stock Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.2  1990 Stock Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.3  Annual Incentive Compensation Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.4  Incentive Compensation Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips Company on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999;
FileNo. 001-00720).
10.5  Amendment and Restatement of ConocoPhillips Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, dated April  19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo.  001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.6  Non-Employee Director Retirement Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.7  Omnibus Securities Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.8  Key Employee Missed Credited Service Retirement Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.9  Phillips Petroleum Company Stock Plan forNon-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.10.1  Amendment and Restatement of ConocoPhillips Key Employee Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated April  19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.10.2  First Amendment to the ConocoPhillips Key Employee Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated July  20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.10.3  Second Amendment to the ConocoPhillips Key Employee Supplemental Retirement Plan, dated March  14, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.11.1  Amendment and Restatement of Defined ContributionMake-Up Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title I, dated April 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.11.2  Amendment and Restatement of Defined ContributionMake-Up Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title II, dated April 19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.2 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.11.3  First Amendment to the Defined ContributionMake-Up Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title II, dated October 11, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.11.4  Second Amendment to the Defined ContributionMake-Up Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title II, dated December 17, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11.4 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.12  2002 Omnibus Securities Plan of Phillips Petroleum Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.13  Amendment and Restatement of 1998 Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.14  Amendment and Restatement of 1998 Key Employee Stock Performance Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.15  Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.16  ConocoPhillips Form Indemnity Agreement with Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.17.1  Rabbi Trust Agreement dated December  17, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips Holding Company on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999; FileNo.  001-14521).
10.17.2  Amendment to Rabbi Trust Agreement dated February  25, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39.1 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002; FileNo.  000-49987).
10.17.3  Phillips Petroleum Company Grantor Trust Agreement, dated June  1, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.3 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.17.4  First Amendment to the Trust Agreement under the Phillips Petroleum Company Grantor Trust Agreement, dated May  3, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.4 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.17.5  Second Amendment to the Trust Agreement under the Phillips Petroleum Company Grantor Trust Agreement, dated January  15, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.5 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.17.6  Third Amendment to the Trust Agreement under the Phillips Petroleum Company Grantor Trust Agreement, dated October  5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.6 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo.  001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.17.7  Fourth Amendment to the Trust Agreement under the ConocoPhillips Company Grantor Trust Agreement, dated May  1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.7 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.17.8  Fifth Amendment to the Trust Agreement under the ConocoPhillips Company Grantor Trust Agreement, dated May  20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.8 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.18.1  ConocoPhillips Directors’ Charitable Gift Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.18.2  First and Second Amendments to the ConocoPhillips Directors’ Charitable Gift Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008; FileNo. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.19  ConocoPhillips Matching Gift Plan for Directors and Executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.20.1  Amendment and Restatement of Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title I, dated April  19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.20.2  Amendment and Restatement of Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title II, dated April  19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.2 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.20.3  First Amendment to the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20.3 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.20.4  Second Amendment to the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20.4 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.20.5  Amendment and Restatement of Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan of ConocoPhillips—Title II, 2013 Restatement dated November 17, 2014 (Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2013) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20.5 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.21  Amendment and Restatement of ConocoPhillips Key Employee Change in Control Severance Plan, effective January  1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013; FileNo.  001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.22  ConocoPhillips Executive Severance Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.23.1  2004 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Appendix C of ConocoPhillips’ Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders; FileNo. 000-49987).
10.23.2  Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Program under the 2004 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.23.3  Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement under the Performance Share Program under the 2004 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.24  Omnibus Amendments to certain ConocoPhillips employee benefit plans, adopted December  7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007; FileNo.001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.25  2009 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of ConocoPhillips’ Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.1  2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of ConocoPhillips’ Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A relating to the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.2  Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Program under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, effective February 9, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.3  Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement under the Restricted Stock Program under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, effective April 4, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.4  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Restricted Stock Program under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, effective May 8, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.5  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Restricted Stock Program under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated September 18, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.5 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.26.6  Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the Restricted Stock Program under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 5, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.6 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.7  Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement—Canada under the Restricted Stock Program under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 5, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.7 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.8  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Restricted Stock Program under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 5, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.8 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.9  Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Program under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 5, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.9 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.10  Form ofMake-up Grant Award Agreement under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated January 1, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013; FileNo. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.26.11  Form of Key Employee Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Stock Option Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.12  Form of Key Employee Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Stock Option Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 16, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.12 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.13  Form of Key Employee Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Restricted Stock Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.14  Form of Key Employee Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Restricted Stock Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 16, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.14 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.15  Form of Performance Period IX Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.26.16  Form of Performance Period IX Award Agreement—Canada, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.17  Form of Performance Period X Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.18  Form of Performance Period X Award Agreement—Canada, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.19  Form of Performance Period XI Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; File No. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.26.20Form of Performance Period XI Award Agreement—Canada, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; File No. 001-32395).
10.26.21Form of Performance Period XII Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.2210.26.20  Form of Performance Period XII Award Agreement—Canada, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.2310.26.21  Form of Performance Period XIV Award Agreement, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 16, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.23 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.2410.26.22  Form of Performance Period XIV Award Agreement—Canada, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 16, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26.24 to the Annual Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.2510.26.23  Form of Inducement Grant Award Agreement under the 2011 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated March 31, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.26.24*Form of Performance Share Unit Award Terms and Conditions for Performance Period 18, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 13, 2018.

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.26.25*Form of Performance Share Unit Award Terms and Conditions for Performance Period 18 for eligible employees on the Canada payroll, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 13, 2018.
10.27.1  2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit  10.1 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 8-K filed on May 14, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.27.2  Form of Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions, as part of the ConocoPhillips Targeted Variable Long Term Incentive Program of ConocoPhillips, granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated September 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.27.3  Form of Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions, as part of the ConocoPhillips Targeted Variable Long Term Incentive Program, granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated September 3, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015; FileNo. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.27.4  Form of Retention Award Terms and Conditions, as part of the Restricted Stock Unit Award, granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.27.5  Form ofNon-Employee Director Restricted Stock Units Terms and Conditions, as part of the Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors of ConocoPhillips, dated January 15, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.27.6  Form ofNon-Employee Director Restricted Stock Units Terms and Conditions – CanadianNon-Employee Directors, as part of the Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors of ConocoPhillips, dated January  15, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.27.7  Form ofNon-Employee Director Restricted Stock Units Terms and Conditions – NorwegianNon-Employee Directors, as part of the Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors of ConocoPhillips, dated January  15, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.27.8Form of Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions, as part of the ConocoPhillips Stock Option Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 14, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017; FileNo. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.27.9Form of Performance Share Unit Award Terms and Conditions for Performance Period 17, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 14, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.27.10Form of Performance Share Unit Award Terms and Conditions for Performance Period 17 for eligible employees on the Canada payroll, as part of the ConocoPhillips Performance Share Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 14, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.27.11Form of Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions as part of the ConocoPhillips Restricted Stock Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 14, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.27.12*Form of Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions as part of the ConocoPhillips Executive Restricted Stock Unit Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 13, 2018.
10.27.13*Form of Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions for eligible employees on the Canada payroll, as part of the ConocoPhillips Executive Restricted Stock Unit Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 13, 2018.
10.27.14*Form of Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions as part of the ConocoPhillips Restricted Stock Program granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated February 13, 2018.
10.27.15*Form of Retention Award Terms and Conditions, 2017 revision, as part of the Restricted Stock Unit Award, granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips.
10.28  Amendment and Restatement of Annex to Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Arrangements of ConocoPhillips, dated April  19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.29  Amendment, Change of Sponsorship, and Restatement of Certain Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans of ConocoPhillips, dated April  19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.30  Amendment and Restatement of the Burlington Resources Inc. Management Supplemental Benefits Plan, dated April  19, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012; FileNo.  001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.31  Amendment and Restatement of Deferred Compensation Trust Agreement forNon-Employee Directors of Phillips Petroleum Company, dated June 23, 1995 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.32  Indemnification and Release Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April  26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on May 1, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.33  Intellectual Property Assignment and License Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April  26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on May 1, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.34  Tax Sharing Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April  26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on May 1, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).

Exhibit

Number

Description
10.35  Employee Matters Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April  12,26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on May 1, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.36  Transition Services Agreement between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, dated April  26, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on May 1, 2012; FileNo. 001-32395).
10.37  ConocoPhillips Clawback Policy dated October  3, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012; FileNo.  001-32395).
10.38  Term Loan Agreement, between ConocoPhillips, as borrower, ConocoPhillips Company, as guarantor, Toronto Dominion (Texas) LLC, as administrative agent and the banks party thereto, with TD Securities (USA) LLC, as lead arranger and bookrunner, dated March 18, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form8-K filed on March 21, 2016; FileNo. 001-32395).
12*  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
21*  List of Subsidiaries of ConocoPhillips.
23.1*  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
23.2*  Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton.
31.1*  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2*  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32*  Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
99*  Report of DeGolyer and MacNaughton.

Exhibit

Number

Description

101.INS*  XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH*  XBRL Schema Document.
101.CAL*  XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*  XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*  XBRL Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*  XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Filed herewith.

*Filed herewith.
The schedules to this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of RegulationS-K. ConocoPhillips agrees to furnish a copy of any schedule omitted from this exhibit to the SEC upon request.
ConocoPhillips has previously been granted confidential treatment for certain portions of this exhibit pursuant to Rule24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  CONOCOPHILLIPS
February 21, 201720, 2018 

/s/ Ryan M. Lance

 

Ryan M. Lance

Chairman of the Board of Directors

and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed, as of February 21, 2017,20, 2018, on behalf of the registrant by the following officers in the capacity indicated and by a majority of directors.

 

Signature  Title

/s/ Ryan M. Lance

Ryan M. Lance

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)

/s/ Don E. Wallette, Jr.

Don E. Wallette, Jr.

  

Executive Vice President, Finance,
Commercial and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial officer)

/s/ Glenda M. Schwarz

Glenda M. Schwarz

  Vice President and Controller
(Principal accounting officer)

/s/ Richard L. Armitage

Richard L. Armitage

  Director

/s/ Richard H. Auchinleck

Richard H. Auchinleck

  Director

/s/ Charles E. Bunch

Charles E. Bunch

  Director

/s/ James E. Copeland, Jr.Caroline M. Devine

James E. Copeland, Jr.Caroline M. Devine

  Director

/s/ Gay Huey Evans

Gay Huey Evans

  Director

/s/ John V. Faraci

John V. Faraci

  Director

/s/ Jody Freeman

Jody Freeman

  Director

/s/ Sharmila Mulligan

Sharmila Mulligan

Director

/s/ Arjun N. Murti

Arjun N. Murti

  Director

/s/ Robert A. Niblock

Robert A. Niblock

  Director

/s/ Harald J. Norvik

Harald J. Norvik

  Director

 

190189