UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM10-K 10-K/A

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2018

or

 For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2016

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from             to             

 For the Transition Period from                  to                 

Commission file number001-34702

SPS COMMERCE, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware

 

Delaware

41-2015127

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

333 South Seventh Street, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, MN 55402

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

(612)435-9400

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common stock, par value $0.001 per share

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

(Nasdaq Global Market)

(Title of each class)

(Name of each exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes      No  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” andfiler,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large Accelerated Filer  ☒

Accelerated Filer  ☐

Non-Accelerated Filer  ☐

Smaller Reporting Company

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging Growth Company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes      No  

As of June 30, 2016,29, 2018, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of shares of the registrant’s common stock held bynon-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sale price of $60.60$73.48 per share on the Nasdaq Global Market on such date) was approximately $1.0$1.3 billion.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of February 10, 20178, 2019  was 17,180,65017,760,003 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 23, 201714, 2019 (the “2017“2019 Proxy Statement”), which is expected to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form10-K, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report onForm 10-K.


EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends the SPS Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 22, 2019 (the “Original Filing”).  We are filing this Amendment No. 1 for the sole purpose of correcting a typographical error in Item 6. Selected Financial Data and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.  Within the operating data table of Item 6, the table in footnote 3 of Item 6, and the reconciliation of net income to non-GAAP income per share table in Item 7, the Income tax effects of adjustments was inadvertently reported as $(4,468,000), with the corresponding Non-GAAP income with tax adjustments reported as $36,101,000 and the corresponding Non-GAAP income per share reported as $2.10 (basic) and $2.05 (diluted).  The correct numbers are:

Income tax effects of adjustments: $(6,594,000)

Non-GAAP income: $33,975,000

Non-GAAP income per share:  $1.98 (basic) and $1.93 (diluted)

The correct numbers appeared in our press release dated February 12, 2019, which was filed as Exhibit 99 to our Current Report on Form 10-K.  This Form 10-K/A does not reflect events occurring after the Original Filing and does not modify or update in any way the disclosures contained in the Original Filing except as set forth above. Accordingly, this Amendment No. 1 should be read in conjunction with our filings with the SEC subsequent to the date of the Original Filing.  As required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, new certificates of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are being filed as exhibits to this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A.


SPS COMMERCE, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K

Table of Contents

 

Unless the context otherwise requires, for purposes of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” and “SPS” refer to SPS Commerce, Inc.


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Annual Report onForm 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward looking statements regarding us, our business prospects and our results of operations that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause our actual business, prospects and results of operations to differ materially from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those described under the heading“Risk Factors” included in this Annual Report on    Form10-K.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.  In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the following words: “anticipate,” “assumes,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words.  We expressly disclaim any intent or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.  Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business.


PART I

Item 1.

Business

Overview

SPS Commerce is We are a leading provider of cloud-based supply chain management solutions, providing network-proven fulfillment, sourcing, and item assortment management solutions, along with comprehensive retail performance analytics to thousands of customers worldwide. We provide our solutions through the SPS Commerce platform, a cloud-based product suiteservices that improves the waymake it easier for retailers, suppliers, retailers,grocers, distributors and logistics firms to orchestrate the sourcing, set upmanagement of new vendorsitem data, order fulfillment, inventory control and items, and fulfillment of products that customers buy from retailers and suppliers. sales analytics across all channels. Implementing and maintaining thisa suite of supply chain management capabilities is resource intensive and is not a core competency for most businesses. The services offered by SPS Commerce platform eliminateseliminate the need foron-premise software and support staff which enablesby taking on that capability on the customer’s behalf.  The services SPS Commerce provides allow our supplier customers to focusincrease their resources on their core business. The SPS Commerce platform enables retailers, suppliers, and logistics firms to increase supply cycle agility, optimize their inventory levels and sell-through, reduce operational costs increaseand gain increased visibility into customer orders, ensuring that suppliers, grocers, distributors, and ensure supplierslogistics firms can satisfy exacting retailer requirements.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had approximately 25,00029,000 customers with contracts to pay us monthly fees, which we refer to as recurring revenue customers.  We have also generated revenues by providing our cloud-based supply chain management solutionsservices to an additional 45,00051,000 organizations that, together with our recurring revenue customers, we refer to as our customers.  Once connected to our platform,the SPS Commerce Platform, our customers often require integrations to new organizations that represent an expansion of our platformPlatform and new sources of revenues for us.

As a provider of cloud services, we enable our customers to easily interact with their trading partners aroundFor the world without the local implementationyears ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and servicing of software that traditionalon-premise solutions require. Our delivery model also enables us to offer functionality, integration, analytics and reliability with less cost and risk than traditional solutions.

For 2016, 2015, and 2014, we generated revenues of $193.3$248.2 million, $158.5$220.1 million and $127.9$193.2 million, respectively.  Our fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20162018 represented our 64th72nd consecutive quarter of increased revenues.  Recurring revenues from recurring revenue customers accounted for 91.6%93%, 90.8%93% and 90.0%92% of our total revenues for 2016, 2015,the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.  Our revenues are not concentrated with any customer, as our largest customer represented 2% or less than 1% of total revenues for 2016, 2015,the years ended December 31, 2018, and 2014.

Our Industry

Today’s Retail Landscape

One2017 and less than 2% of the driving factors in the retail industry today is the rising influence ofe-commerce and the mobile shopping experience. The retail industry is in the midst of a transformation, as retailers, suppliers and the many companies that facilitate transactions in the industry reshape how they do business and adapt to omnichannel retailing — defined as providing a shopper with a consistent experience wherever they might engage a retailer (or increasingly a supplier), whetherbricks-and-mortar, website, or mobile experience.E-commerce is changing the selling channels for retailers and suppliers. These changes are requiring retailers, suppliers, and logistics partners to accelerate the speed and volume of sourcing new items to sell; setting up the items to be sold and delivered through multiple channels; and then, analyzing performance to make changes. Once in place, items need to be sold and fulfilled through different channels based on the consumers’ need which requires improved adaptability to adjust to that consumer request without friction. New business processes and technology are required to accomplish this.

Supply Chain Management Industry Background

The supply chain management industry enables thousands of retailers around the world to transact and grow their relationships with tens of thousands of suppliers. Additional participants in this market include distributors, third-party logistics providers, manufacturers, fulfillment and warehousing providers and sourcing companies. Supply chain management involves communicating data about the goods themselves, data related to the

exchange of goods among these trading partners, and information about the many thousands of companies who are members of the supply chain community. At every stage of the supply chain there are inefficient, labor-intensive processes between trading partners with significant documentation requirements, such as the counting, sorting and verifying of goods before shipment, while in transit and upon delivery — and traditional legacy systems offer very limited, if any, real time visibility into progress or status. Modern supply chain management solutions must address trading partners’ needs for integration, collaboration, connectivity, visibility and data analytics to improve the agility, accuracy and efficiency with which goods are ordered and supplied.

The industry initially focused on automating and streamlining the processing of fulfilling transactions between retailers and suppliers, and others in the supply chain, ensuring orders were placed accurately and quickly, and that goods were delivered on time and meeting the retailer’s requirements. As the pace of change in retailing has accelerated with the convergence of digital and physical commerce, today’s supply chain solutions need to provide real time visibility into the status of an order. This requires orchestrating a growing set of valuable capabilities that draw on foundational transaction information, and add value beyond the traditional supply chain management function within retailers and suppliers. In today’s rapidly changing omnichannel retail market, where retailers and suppliers are increasingly focused on electronic commerce andbrick-and-mortar commerce as a continuum, supply chain information and visibility to it has a role across the entire enterprise. Demand planning and forecasting groups need visibility from the front of the store all the way back to the factory to ensure supply meets demand. Sourcing operations require access to thousands of new items to drive theire-commerce growth and ensure physical stores have the items consumers will find compelling and engaging.

As familiarity and acceptance of cloud-based services continues to accelerate, we believe companies, both large and small, will continue to turn to cloud-based services similar to ours to provide them with the agility and insight their supply chains need in today’s retail marketplace. Increasingly, traditional supply chain technologies andon-premise software deployments do not provide the complex orchestration, analytics, and insight required today.

The Omnichannel Foundation — Fulfillment Automation Between Retailers and Suppliers

Retailers impose an increasingly stringent and complex set of specific work-flow rules and standards on their trading partners for electronically orchestrating their fulfillment of orders. These “rule books” include specific business processes for suppliers to exchange data and documentation requirements such as invoices, purchase orders and advance shipping notices. Rule books can be hundreds of pages, and retailers frequently have multiple rule books for international requirements or specific fulfillment models. Suppliers working with multiple retailers need to accommodate different rule books for each retailer. These rule books are not standardized between retailers, but vary based on a retailer’s size, industry and technological capabilities. The responsibility for creating information “maps,” which are integration connections between the retailer and the supplier that comply with the retailer’s rule books, resides primarily with the supplier. The cost of noncompliance can be refusal of delivered goods, fines and ultimately a termination of the supplier’s relationship with the retailer. The complexity of retailers’ requirements and consequences of noncompliance create growing demand for specialized supply chain management automation solutions.

Traditional Supply Chain Management Solutions

Traditional supply chain management solutions, which range fromnon-automated paper or fax solutions to electronic solutions, implemented usingon-premise licensed software, tend to focus primarily on fulfillment automation.On-premise licensed software provides connectivity between only one organization and its trading partners and typically requires significant time and technical expertise to configure, deploy and maintain. Historically these software providers primarily linked retailers and suppliers through the Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) protocol that enables the structured electronic transmission of data between organizations. Increasingly organizations are utilizing direct communication between systems utilizing application programming interfaces (APIs). Because ofset-up and maintenance costs, technical complexity and a growing volume of requirements from retailers, the traditional software model is not well suited for many suppliers, especially those small and medium in size.

Additionally, the traditional approach to supply chain automation involves a system architecture made up of manypoint-to-point connections between retailers and their suppliers. These collections of connections are inherently error prone and can be difficult to adapt to changing requirements and market circumstances. For instance, if there is a broad trend in the market (such as the growing popularity of mobile commerce) that many members of a retailing segment would like to adapt to, a supplier would be faced with a series of enhancements, on aone-by-one basis, to the collection of connections they have with their retailers. Traditional approaches do not have the inherent, or architectural, capabilities to enable the exchange of information across the retailer’s organization or with their trading partners, or the flexibility and agility to embrace the ongoing change that omnichannel retailing requires.

Moving Beyond Transactions — Insight and Data Analysis Powering Intelligent, Responsive Decision Making

Fulfillment automation is a first step toward addressing the complexities in the supply chain ecosystem, but is only the necessary first step in providing omnichannel retail success. As the number and geographic dispersion of trading partners has grown, and the number of individual orders continue to grow, it has never been more important for retailers and suppliers to have precise, timely insight into demand and supply, by order, item and location in the fulfilment journey. In today’s retailing marketplace, where an order can be placed by a consumer with the swipe of a finger, retailers need to make fulfillment decisions in an instant, deciding the most cost efficient location of inventory (which could be a warehouse, a store, or a vendor’s warehouse). As a result, trading partners need a solution that effectively consolidates, distills and provides visibility and sell-through information to managers and decision-makers who can use the information to drive efficiency, revenue growth and profitability. The abundance of data produced by these processes, including data for fulfillment, sales and inventory levels, is often inaccessible to trading partners for analysis. The data and related analytics are essential for optimizing the inventory and fulfillment process and will continue to drive demand for supply chain management solutions.

Cloud Services Provide Flexibility, Adaptability and a Key Source of Information Across the Supply Chain

Cloud services are well suited for providing the capabilities that retail supply chain management needs today because they inherently enable rapid provisioning of capabilities and offer robust and reliable integration with retailer and supplier systems to provide data and visibility into the orchestration of complex order fulfillment. Cloud services are able to continue utilizing standard connectivity protocols, such as EDI, but also are able to support the growing use of standard internet protocols that retailers require, such as XML, in addition to enablingAPI-based integration. These cloud services connect suppliers and retailers more efficiently than traditionalon-premise software solutions by leveraging the integrations created for a single supplier across all participating suppliers.

Traditionally the supply chain depended on integration with a retailer or supplier’s enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, which is the system of recordtotal revenues for the bulk of information related to placing an order. In today’s retailing market, many systems working closely together are essential to provide the consumer with the merchandising information they need to make a purchase decision (e.g., ecommerce systems) as well as information required to fulfill the order (e.g., warehouse and transportation systems). Cloud services enable an organization to knit the information required for sourcing and merchandising an item, placing an order for that item, and fulfilling that item — connecting information and systems from across the supply chain ecosystem, enabling increased retailer agility and globalization, and addressing the increased complexity affecting the supply chain. In addition, cloud services can integrate supply chain management applications with organizations’ existing enterprise resource planning systems.year ended December 31, 2016.

Cloud services andAPI-based service integration provide retailers and suppliers with access to new and powerful capabilities quickly, often integrated with analytics to enable rapid service innovation and responsiveness as the retailing landscape continues to respond to omnichannel advancements.

Our Solutions

Our Platform

We operateSPS Commerce operates one of the largest retail trading partner networks through a cloud-based services suite that improvesimprove the way retailers, suppliers, retailers,grocers, distributors and other trading partnerslogistics firms manage and fulfill orders, manageadminister sell-through performance and source new items. Approximately 70,000Today, approximately 80,000 customers across more than 60 countries have used our platformare using SPS Commerce solutions to improveexpand and optimize the performance of their trading relationships. Our platform

The SPS Commerce business model fundamentally changes how organizations use electronic communication to manage their omnichannel, supply chainschain, and other business requirements by replacing the collection of traditional, custom-built,point-to-point integrations with a network model wherebythat facilitates a single integration to our platform enables an organization to connect seamlesslyautomated connection to the entire SPS Commerce network of trading partners.

From that single connection, a member of our network can make use of the full suite of our solutions,services, from fulfillment automation, to the analysis and optimization of item sell-through performance, to sourcing new items, new retailing relationships, orlogistics providers, of logistics andor other services.  These cloud services deliver value as stand-alone offerings but can also provide greater value when used collectively. This represents a fundamental change to fulfillment automation and enables inherent adaptability and flexibility not possible with traditional supply chain management system architectures.

Our platform is comprised of a set of coupled cloud services that deliver value as stand-alone offerings, but also provide additional value when used collectively. Our fulfillment product combines integrations thatservice allows customers to comply with numerous rule booksrulebooks for retailers, grocers and distributors with whom we and our customers have done business. By maintainingdistributors. Maintaining current integrationsconnections with retailers, our platformgrocers, and distributors removes the need for supplierstheir trading partners to continually stayup-to-date with the rule book changestheir required by retailers. Moreover, by utilizingrulebook change. The utilization of a cloud services model we eliminateeliminates or greatly reducereduces the burden on supplierstrading partners to support and maintain anon-premise software application, thereby reducing ongoing operating costs. As the transaction hub for trading partners, we also are able tocan provide increased performance visibility and data analytics capabilities for retailers and suppliers across their supply chains, each of which is difficult to gain from traditional,point-to-point integration solutions.


The following solutionsservices are enabled through the SPS Commerce cloud services platform:Platform:

Trading Partner Fulfillment.    Our Fulfillment solution provides fulfillment automation and replaces or augments an organization’s existing trading partner electronic communication infrastructure, enabling suppliers to have visibility into the journey of an order and comply with retailers’ rule books and enabling the electronic exchange of information among numerous trading partners through various protocols.

Trading Partner Analytics.    Our Analytics solution consists of data analytics applications that enable our customers to improve their visibility across, and analysis of, their supply chains. When focused onpoint-of-sale data, for example, retailers and suppliers can ensure inventory is located where demand is highest. Retailers improve their visibility into supplier performance and their understanding of product sell-through.

Trading Partner Assortment.    Today’s retail marketplace requires the management of tens and even hundreds of individual attributes associated with each item a retailer or supplier sells today. This information can include digital images/video, customer facing descriptions and measurements, and warehouse information. Our Assortment product provides robust, extensible management of this information, enabling accurate orders and rapid fulfillment.

Trading Partner Sourcing.    Through Retail Universe, our social network for the retail industry, retailers can source providers of new items, suppliers can connect with new retailers, and the broader retailing community can make connections to expand their business networks and grow.

Trading Partner Community Development.    Our Community Development solution provides communication programs based on our best practices. These programs enable organizations, from large and small retailers and suppliers to emerging providers of value-added products and services, to establish trading partner relationships with new trading partners to expand their businesses.

Other Trading Partner Solutions.    We provide a number of peripheral solutions such as barcode labeling, planogram services and our scan and pack application, which helps trading partners process information to streamline the picking and packaging process.

Trading Partner Community. The Community solution empowers retailers, grocers, and distributors to introduce changes to their supply chain requirements to their trading partner community, and onboard new vendors quickly to receive their first orders.

Trading Partner Fulfillment.  The Fulfillment solution provides fulfillment automation and replaces or augments an organization’s existing staff and trading partner electronic communication infrastructure by enabling easy compliance with retailers’ rulebooks, electronic exchange of information among numerous trading partners through various protocols, and greater visibility into the journey of an order.

Trading Partner Assortment. Today’s retail marketplace requires the management of tens and even hundreds of individual attributes associated with each item a retailer or supplier sells.  This information can include supply chain descriptions and measurements, store and shelf dimensions, warehouse dimensions, digital images/video, customer facing descriptions and measurements, and warehouse information.  The Assortment solution provides robust, extensible, management of this information, enabling accurate orders and rapid fulfillment.

Trading Partner Analytics.  The Analytics solution consists of data analytics applications that allow our customers to improve their visibility across, and analysis of, their supply chains.  When focused on point-of-sale data, for example, retailers and suppliers can ensure inventory is located where demand is highest.  Additionally, retailers improve their visibility into supplier performance and their understanding of product sell-through.

Trading Partner Sourcing. Through the Sourcing Solution, retailers can leverage our social network for the retail industry, and source providers of new items, suppliers can connect with new retailers, and the broader retailing community can make connections to expand their business networks and grow.

Other Trading Partner Solutions.  We provide a number of peripheral solutions such as barcode labeling, planogram services and our scan and pack application, which helps trading partners process information to streamline the picking and packaging process.

Our Customer and Sales Sources

As one of the largest providers of cloud services for retail supply chain management, the trading partner relationships that we enable among our retailer, supplier, grocer, distributor, and fulfillmentlogistics customers naturally lead to new customer acquisition opportunities.

“Network Effect”

Once connected to our network, trading partners can exchange electronic supply chain information with each other. Through our platform, we have helped approximately 70,000 customers to improve the performance of their trading partner relationships. The value of our platformnetwork increases with the number of trading partners connected to the platform.it. The addition of each new customer to our platform enables that new customer to communicate with our existing customers and enablespermits our existing customers to do business with the new customer. Additionally, through our Sourcing product,service, our community now has a social network focused on facilitating connections and business interactions among retailers and suppliers.  This “network effect” of adding an additional customercustomers to our platformsolutions infrastructure creates a significant opportunity for existing customers to realize incremental sales by working with our new trading partners and vice versa. As a result of this increased volume of activity amongstamong our network participants, we earn additional revenues from these participants.


Customer Acquisition Sources

Community.  Community Enablement.    As retailers and suppliers reshape how they do business in an omnichannel landscape, they need to bring new capabilities and services to their trading partner networks.  For instance, a supplier may wish to collaborate with their retailers aroundpoint-of-sale analytics data, or a retailer may decide to change the workflow or protocol by which it interacts with its suppliers.  In each case, the supplier and retailer may engage us to work with its trading partner base to enable the new capability.  Performing these programs on behalf of retailers and suppliers often generates supplier sales leads for us.

Referrals from Our Customers. We also receive sales leads from our customers seeking to communicate electronically with their trading partners.  For example, a supplier may refer to us its third-party logistics provider or manufacturer which is not in our network.

Channel Partners. In addition to the customer acquisition sources identified above, we market and sell our solutions through a variety of channel partners including software providers, resellers, system integrators and logistics partners.  For example, software partners such as Microsoft, NetSuite, Oracle, SAP, Sage and their business partner communities generate sales for us as part of broader enterprise resource planning, warehouse management system and/or transportation management system sales efforts.  Our logistics partners also drive new sales both by providing leads and by embedding our solutions as part of their service offerings.

Our Sales Force

We also sell our solutions through a global sales force which is organized as follows:

Retailer Sales.    We employ a team of sales professionals who focus on selling our cloud services suite to retailers and distributors.

Supplier Sales.    We employ a team of supplier sales representatives focused on selling our cloud services suite to suppliers.

Business Development Efforts.    Our business development organization is tasked with finding new sources of revenue and development of new business opportunities through channel partners and other areas that present opportunity for growth.

Retailer Sales. We employ a team of sales representatives who focus on selling our cloud services suite to retailers and distributors.

Supplier Sales. We employ a team of supplier sales representatives focused on selling our cloud services suite to suppliers.

Logistic Sales.We employ a team of logistic sales representatives focused on selling our cloud services suite to logistic service providers.

Business Development Efforts. Our business development organization is tasked with finding new sources of revenue and development of new business opportunities through channel partners and other areas that present an opportunity for growth.

Our Growth Strategy

Our objective is to be the leading global provider of supply chain management solutions.  Key elements of our strategy include:

Further Penetrate Our Current Market. We believe the global supply chain management market is underpenetrated and, as the retail industry continues to respond to the changing requirements of the omnichannel marketplace, and as the supply chain ecosystem becomes more complex and geographically dispersed, the demand for supply chain management solutions will increase, especially among small- and medium-sized businesses.  We intend to continue leveraging our relationships with customers and their trading partners to obtain new sales leads.

Increase Revenues from Our Customer Base. We believe our overall customer satisfaction is strong and will lead our customers to further expand their use of the solutions they have purchased, as well as purchase additional services to continue improving the performance of their trading partner relationships, generating additional revenues for us.  We also expect to introduce new solutions to sell to our customers.  We believe our position as the incumbent supply chain management solution provider to our customers, our integration into our recurring revenue customers’ business systems and the modular nature of our Platform are conducive to deploying additional solutions with customers.

Expand Our Distribution Channels.We intend to grow our business by expanding our sales capacity to gain new customers.  We also believe there are valuable opportunities to promote and sell our solutions through collaboration with other providers.


 

Further Penetrate Our Current Market.    We believe the global supply chain management market is underpenetrated and, as the retail industry continues to respond to the changing requirements of the omnichannel marketplace, and as the supply chain ecosystem becomes more complex and geographically dispersed, the demand for supply chain management solutions will increase, especially among small- andmedium-sized businesses. We intend to continue leveraging our relationships with customers and their trading partners to obtain new sales leads.

Increase Revenues from Our Customer Base.    We believe our overall customer satisfaction is strong and will lead our customers to further expand their use of the solutions they have currently purchased as well as purchase additional services to continue improving the performance of their trading partner relationships, generating additional revenues for us. In 2015, we hired a Chief Customer Success Officer to lead our customer success efforts and to increase opportunities to sell additional solutions and services to our existing customers. We also expect to introduce new solutions to sell to our customers. We believe our position as the incumbent supply chain management solution provider to our customers, our integration into our recurring revenue customers’ business systems and the modular nature of our platform are conducive to deploying additional solutions with customers.

Expand Our Distribution Channels.    We intend to grow our business by expanding our network of sales representatives to gain new customers. We also believe there are valuable opportunities to promote and sell our solutions through collaboration with other providers.

Expand Our International Presence.    Presence. We believe our presence in the Asia Pacific, as well as in Europe, represents a significant competitive advantage.  We plan to increase our internationalglobal sales efforts to obtain new supplier and retailer customers around the world.  We intend to leverage our current internationalglobal presence to increase the number of integrations we have with retailers in foreign markets to make our platformsolutions more valuable to supplierstheir trading partners based overseas.

Enhance and Expand Our Platform.    We intend to further improve and develop the functionality and features of our platform, including, from time to time, developing new solutions and applications.

Selectively Pursue Strategic Acquisitions.    The fragmented nature of our market provides opportunity for selective acquisitions. In 2014, we purchased substantially all of the assets of Leadtec Systems Australia Pty Ltd (“Leadtec”) and its affiliates, a privately-held provider of cloud-based integration solutions in Australia and New Zealand. This acquisition expanded our base of recurring revenue customers and added suppliers to our network. In 2016, we purchased Toolbox Solutions, Inc., a Canadian basedpoint-of-sale analytics and category management services provider to retailers and consumer packaged goods suppliers in North America. To complement and accelerate our internal growth, we may pursue acquisitions of other supply chain management companies to add customers or additional functionalities. We plan to evaluate potential acquisitions of other supply chain management companies primarily based on the number of customers and revenue the acquisition would provide relative to the purchase price. We also may pursue acquisitions that allow us to expand into regions where we do not have a significant presence or to offer new functionalities we do not currently provide. We plan to evaluate potential acquisitions to expand into new regions or offer additional functionalities primarily based on the anticipated growth the acquisition would provide, the purchase price and our ability to integrate and operate the acquired business.

Enhance and Expand Our Services.We intend to further improve and develop the functionality and features of our Platform, including, from time to time, developing new solutions and applications.

Selectively Pursue Strategic Acquisitions.The fragmented nature of our market provides an opportunity for selective acquisitions. We plan to evaluate potential acquisitions based on the number of new customers, revenue, functionality, or geographic reach the acquisition would provide relative to the purchase price and our ability to integrate and operate the acquired business. In 2018, we acquired EDIAdmin, a leading provider of supply chain integration technology.  Also, in 2018, we acquired CovalentWorks, a provider of cloud-based EDI solutions to small- and medium-sized businesses.  These acquisitions further extended the power of our network.  

Technology, Development and Operations

Technology

We wereSPS Commerce was an early provider of cloud services to the retail supply chain management industry, launching the first version of what would become our platformcurrent services in 1997.  We use commercially available hardware and cloud services with a combination of proprietary and commercially available software.

Our cloud platformservice model treats all customers as logically separate tenants inwithin a common platform.shared virtual infrastructure.  As a result, we spread the cost of delivering our solutions across our customer base.  Because we do not manage thousands of distinct applications with their own business logic and database schemes, we believe that we can scale our business faster than traditional software vendors, even those that modified their products to be accessible over the Internet.

Development

Our research and development efforts focus on maintaining, improving and enhancing our existing solutions, as well as developing new solutions and applications and maintaining our existing solutions.applications.  Our multi-tenant platform servessolutions serve all of our customers, which allows us to maintain relatively low research and development expenses and release software updates more frequently compared to traditionalon-premise licensed software solutions that support multiple versions.  Our development efforts take place at our U.S. locations in Minnesota and New Jersey,Jersey; as well as in Melbourne, Australia; Toronto, Canada,Canada; and Kiev, Ukraine.

Operations

We operate our infrastructure in third-party data centers located in Minnesota, and New Jersey, United States;and Melbourne, Australia; Toronto, Canada;Australia, as well as provisioned services in public cloud providers. In all cases, infrastructure and services on which our platform runs are managed by us.

We have internal and third partythird-party monitoring software that continually checks our platformnetwork and key underlying components for continuous availability and performance, ensuring our platformthe network is always available and providing adequate service levels. We have a technology operations team that provides system provisioning, management, maintenance, monitoring andback-up.

We operate a service architecture using industry best practices to insureensure multiple points of redundancy, high availability and scale as needed.  Our databases are replicated between locations with a defined recovery point objective.


Our Customers

As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had approximately 25,00029,000 recurring revenue customers and approximately 70,00080,000 total customers.  Our primary source of revenue is from small- tomid-sized suppliers in the consumer packaged goods industry. suppliers.  We also generate revenues from other members of the supply chain ecosystem, including retailers, distributors, third-party logistics providers and other trading partners.  Our revenues are not concentrated with any customer, as our largest customer represented 2% or less than 1% of total revenues in 2016, 2015for both the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2014.2017 and less than 2% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Competition

Vendors in the supply chain management industry offer solutions through three delivery methods: on demand ortraditional on-premise software, cloud-based traditionalon-premise softwaremanaged services and managed services.cloud-based full-service solutions.

The market for cloud-based supply chain management solutions is fragmented and rapidly evolving.  Cloud service vendors compete directly with each other based on the following:

the breadth ofpre-built connections to retailers, third-party logistics providers, and other trading partners;

a history of establishing and maintaining reliable integration connections with trading partners;

a reputation of the cloud service vendor in the supply chain management industry;

price;

specialization in a customer market segment;

speed and quality with which the cloud service vendor can integrate its customers to their trading partners;

functionality of the cloud service solution, such as the ability to integrate the solution with a customer’s business systems;

breadth of complementary supply chain management solutions the cloud service vendor offers; and

training and customer support services provided during and after a customer’s initial integration.

We expect to encounter new and increased competition as this market segment consolidates and matures.  Consolidation among cloud service vendors could create a direct competitor that is able tocan compete with us more effectively than the numerous, smaller vendors currently offering cloud service supply chain management solutions.  Increased competition from cloud service vendors could reduce our market share, revenues, and operating margins or otherwise adversely affect our business.

Cloud service vendors also compete with traditionalon-premise software companies and managed service providers.companies.  Traditionalon-premise software companies focused on supply chain integration management includeIBM-Sterling IBM Sterling Commerce andOpenText-GXS.  These companies offer a“do-it-yourself” “do-it-yourself” approach in which customers purchase, install, and manage specialized software, hardware and value-added networks for their supply chain integration needs.  This approach requires customers to invest in staff to operate and maintain the software.  Traditionalon-premise software companies use a single-tenant approach in which information maps to retailers are built for and used by one supplier, as compared to cloud service solutions that allow multiple customers to share information maps with a retailer.

Managed service providers focused on the supply chain management market includeIBM-Sterling IBM Sterling Commerce, OpenText GXS, TrueCommerce, DiCentral, B2B Gateway andOpenText-GXS. many other small providers. These companies combine traditionaloffer a on-premise software, hardwarecloud-based solution in which they develop and value-added networks with professional informationmaintain the core technology, services to managewhile the customer’s internal staff is responsible for the day-to-day customization, optimization, and operations of the technology.

In contrast, full-service providers, including SPS Commerce, offer cloud-based solutions and that customize, optimize and operate the technology. This approach offloads the time-intensive process of managing these resources. Like traditionalon-premise software companies, managed service providers usesolutions, which is not a single-tenant approach.core competency for most businesses.


Customers of traditionalon-premise software companies and managed service providers must typically make significant upfront investments in the supply chain management solutions these competitors provide, which can decrease the customers’ willingness to abandon their investments in favor of a cloud service solution.  Cloud service supply chain management solutions also are at a relatively early stage of development compared to traditionalon-premise software and managed service providers. Cloud service vendors compete with these better establishedtraditional software solutions based on total cost of ownership and flexibility.  If suppliers do not perceive the benefits of cloud service solutions, or if suppliers are unwilling to abandon their investments in other supply chain management solutions, our business and growth may suffer. In addition, many traditionalon-premise software companies and managed service providers have larger customer bases and may be better capitalized than we are, which may provide them with an advantage in developing, marketing or servicing solutions that compete with ours.

Intellectual Property and Proprietary Content

We relySPS Commerce relies on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology and our brand.  We enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements with our employees, consultants and other third parties and control access to software, documentation and other proprietary information.  We have registered trademarks and pending trademark applications in the United States of AmericaU.S. and certain foreign countries.

Depending on the jurisdiction, trademarks are generally valid as long as they are in use or their registrations are properly maintained and they have not been found to have become generic.  Registrations of trademarks can also generally be renewed indefinitely as long as the trademarks are in use.  We do not have any patents, but we have pending patent applications.  Our trade secrets consist primarily of the software we have developed for our SPS Commerce platform.Network.  Our software is also protected under copyright law, but we do not have any registered copyrights.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had 1,2171,231 employees.  We also employ independent contractors to support our operations.  We believe that our continued success will depend on our ability to continue to attract and retain skilled technical and sales personnel.  We have never had a work stoppage, and none of our employees are represented by a labor union.  We believe our relationship with our employees is good.

Company Information

We were originally incorporated as St. Paul Software, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on January 28, 1987.  On May 30, 2001, we reincorporated in Delaware under our current name, SPS Commerce, Inc.  Our principal executive offices are located at 333 South Seventh Street, Suite 1000, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, and our telephone number is (612)435-9400.  Our website address iswww.spscommerce.com.  Information on our website does not constitute part of this Annual Report on Form10-K or any other report we file or furnish with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC.  We provide free access to various reports that we file with or furnish to the SEC through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed or furnished.  These reports include, but are not limited to, our Annual Reports onForm 10-K, Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Q, Current Reports onForm 8-K and any amendments to these reports.  Our SEC reports can be accessed through the investor relations section of our website or through the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.  Stockholders may also request copies of these documents from:

SPS Commerce, Inc.

Attention: Investor Relations

333 South Seventh Street

Suite 1000

Minneapolis, MN 55402

Executive Officers

Set forth below are the names, ages and titles of the persons serving as our executive officers.

 

Name

Age

Age

Position

Archie C. Black

56

54

Chief Executive Officer and President

Kimberly K. Nelson

51

49

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

James J. Frome

54

52

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer


Archie C. Black has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a director since 2001.  Previously, Mr. Black served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1998 to 2001.  Prior to joining us, Mr. Black was a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Investment Advisors, Inc. in Minneapolis, Minnesota and also spent three years at Price Waterhouse.

Kimberly K. Nelson has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since November 2007.  Prior to joining us, Ms. Nelson served as the Finance Director, Investor Relations for Amazon.com from June 2005 through November 2007 and as the Finance Director, Worldwide Application for Amazon.com’s Technology group from April 2003 until June 2005.  Ms. Nelson also served as Amazon.com’s Finance Director, Financial Planning and Analysis from December 2000 until April 2003.

James J. Frome has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since August 2012.  Previously, Mr. Frome served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer from March 2001 to August 2012 and as our Vice President of Marketing from July 2000 to March 2001.  Prior to joining us, Mr. Frome served as a Divisional Vice President of Marketing at Sterling Software, Inc. from 1999 to 2000 and as a Senior Product Manager and Director of Product Management at Information Advantage, Inc. from 1993 to 1999.


Item 1A.

RiskRisk Factors

Set forth below and elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, and in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission,SEC, are risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report onForm 10-K and in other written and oral communications from time to time.  You should carefully consider all of the following risks and the other information in this Report and our other filings with the SEC before you decide to invest in our Company or to maintain or increase your investment.  Our business could be harmed by any of these risks.  The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks.  In assessing these risks, you should also refer to the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form10-K, including our financial statements and related notes.

The risks included in this section are not the only ones we face.   We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment.  New risk factors emerge from time-to-time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the potential impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements.  If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, financial condition and future prospects would likely suffer.  In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.  

If we are unable to attract new customers, or sell additional solutions, or if our customers do not increase their use of our solutions, our revenue growth and profitability will be adversely affected.

To increase our revenues and achieve and maintain profitability, we must regularly add new customers, sell additional solutions and our customers must increase their use of the solutions for which they currently subscribe.  We intend to grow our business by retaining and attracting talent, developing strategic relationships with resellers, including resellers that incorporate our applications in their offerings, and increasing our marketing activities.  If we are unable to hire or retain quality personnel, convert companies that have been referred to us by our existing network into paying customers, ensure the effectiveness of our marketing programs, or if our existing or new customers do not perceive our solutions to be of sufficiently high value and quality, we might not be able to increase sales and our operating results will be adversely affected.  If we fail to sell our new solutions to existing or new customers, we will not generate anticipated revenues from these solutions, our operating results will suffer and we might be unable to grow our revenues or maintain profitability.

We do not have long-term contracts with most of our recurring revenue customers, and our success therefore depends on our ability to maintain a high level of customer satisfaction and a strong reputation in the supply chain management industry.

Our contracts with our recurring revenue customers typically allow the customer to cancel the contract for any reason with 30 to 90 days’ notice.  Our continued success therefore depends significantly on our ability to meet or exceed our recurring revenue customers’ expectations because most recurring revenue customers do not make long-term commitments to use our solutions.  In addition, if our reputation in the supply chain management industry is harmed or diminished for any reason, our recurring revenue customers have the ability to terminate their relationship with us on short notice and seek alternative supply chain management solutions.  We may also not be able to accurately predict future trends in customer renewals, and our customers’ renewal rates may decline or fluctuate because of several factors, including their dissatisfaction with our services, the cost of our services compared to the cost of services offered by our competitors and reductions in our customers’ spending levels.  If a significant number of recurring revenue customers seek to terminate their relationship with us, our business, results of operations and financial condition can be adversely affected in a short period of time.


Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate in the future, which could result in volatility in our stock price.

Our quarterly revenues and results of operations have varied in the past and may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, including the success of our more recent offerings such as our Trading Partner Analytics solution.  If our quarterly revenues or results of operations fluctuate, the price of our common stock could decline substantially.  Fluctuations in our results of operations may be due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those listed below and identified throughout this “Risk Factors” section:

our ability to retain and increase sales to customers and attract new customers, including our ability to maintain and increase our number of recurring revenue customers;

the timing and success of introductions of new solutions or upgrades by us or our competitors;

the strength of the economy, in particular as it affects the retail sector;

the financial condition of our customers;

changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;

competition, including entry into the industry by new competitors and new offerings by existing competitors;

the amount and timing of our expenses, including stock-based compensation and expenditures related to expanding our operations, supporting new customers, performing research and development, or introducing new solutions;

regulatory compliance costs and unforeseen legal expenses, including litigation and settlement costs;

the timing, size, and integration success of potential future acquisitions;

changes in the payment terms for our solutions; and

system or service failures, security breaches or network downtime.

Due to the foregoing factors, and the other risks including those discussed in this Annual Report on Form10-K, you comparing our operation results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. You should not rely on these comparisons of our past results of operations as an indication of our future performance. It is possible that our operating results in one or more future quarters may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors or below any guidance we may provide to the market. If this occurs, the trading price of our common stock could decline significantly.

Interruptions or delays from third-party data centers or to the telecommunications infrastructure could impair the delivery of our solutions and our business could suffer.

We use third-party data centers, located in Minnesota, and New Jersey and Australia, as well as provision services in public cloud providers, to conduct our operations.  In all cases, infrastructure and services on which our platformPlatform runs is managed by us.  In addition, our ability to deliver our services depends on the development and maintenance of telecommunications infrastructure by third parties.  This includes maintenance of a reliable network backbone with the necessary speed, data capacity, bandwidth capacity, and security.  Our operations depend on the protection of the equipment and information we store in these third-party centers, or utilize from third-party telecommunications providers, against damage or service interruptions that may be caused by fire, flood, severe storm, power loss, telecommunications failures, natural disasters, war, criminal act, military action, terrorist attack, financial failure of the service provider, and other similar events beyond our control.  In addition, third party malfeasance, such as intentional misconduct by computer hackers, unauthorized intrusions, computer viruses or denial of service attacks, may also cause substantial service disruptions.  A prolonged service disruption affecting our solutions for any of the foregoing reasons could damage our reputation with current and potential customers, expose us to liability, cause us to lose recurring revenue customers or otherwise adversely affect our business.  We may also incur significant costs for using alternative equipment or taking other actions in preparation for, or in reaction to, events that damage the data centers we use.


Our cloud-based supply chain management solutions are accessed by a large number of customers at the same time.  As we continue to expand the number of our customers and solutions available to our customers, we may not be able to scale our technology to accommodate the increased capacity requirements, which may result in interruptions or delays in service.  In addition, the failure of our third-party data centers to meet our capacity requirements could result in interruptions or delays in our solutions or impede our ability to scale our operations.  In the event that our data center arrangements are terminated, or there is a lapse of service or damage to such facilities, we could experience interruptions in our solutions as well as delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities and services.

Our industry is a prime target for those that seek to steal confidential information and computer malware, viruses, hacking, phishing attacks, spamming, and other cyber-threats could harm our business and cause us to lose the confidence of our users, which could significantly impact our business and results of operations.

As demonstrated by recent material and high-profile data security breaches within the retail industry, computer malware, viruses, computer hacking, phishing attacks, social engineering, and other electronic threats have become more prevalent in our industry, have occurred on our systems in the past, and may occur on our systems in the future.  While we continue to expand our focus on this issue and are taking measures to safeguard our solutions and services from cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities, cyber-attacks and other security incidents continue to evolve in sophistication and frequency.  Furthermore, given the interconnected nature of the retail supply chain and our significant presence in the retail industry, we believe that we are a particularly attractive target for such attacks.  In addition, our connection to the retail industry could present the opportunity for an attack on our system to serve as a way to obtain access into our users’ systems, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and growth prospectus.  Our security measures may also be breached due to employee or other error, intentional malfeasance and other third-party acts, and system errors or vulnerabilities, including vulnerabilities of our third party vendors, customers, or otherwise.  Businesses in our industry have experienced material sales declines after discovering data breaches, and our business could be similarly impacted.  The security costs to reduce the likelihood of an attack are high and may continue to increase. Furthermore, some US states and international jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring companies to notify consumers of data security breaches involving their personal data.  These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause our customers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our data security measures. Reputational value is based in large part on perceptions of subjective qualities.  While reputations may take decades to build, any negative incidents can quickly erode trust and confidence, particularly if they result in adverse mainstream and social media publicity, governmental investigations or litigation.  Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of our products and technical infrastructure to the satisfaction of our users may harm our reputation, impair our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers and expose us to legal claims and government action, each of which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

A failure to protect the integrity and security of our customers’ information and access to our customers’ information systems could expose us to litigation, materially damage our reputation and harm our business, or lead to service disruptions, and the costs of preventing such a failure could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our business involves the collection and use of confidential information of our customers and their trading partners.  The collection and use of this information sometimes requires our direct access to our customers’ information systems.  We cannot assure you that our efforts to protect this confidential information and access will be successful.  Our security measures may be breached as a result of third-party action, including intentional misconduct by computer hackers, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise and result in someone obtaining unauthorized access to our customers’ data or our data, including our intellectual property and other confidential business information, or our IT systems.  Additionally, third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or customers into disclosing sensitive information such as user names, passwords or other information

in order to gain access to our customers’ data or our data or IT systems.  Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, or to sabotage systems, change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.  Malicious third-parties may also conduct attacks designed to temporarily deny customers access to our services.


If any compromise of this information security were to occur, or if we fail to detect and appropriately respond to a significant data security breach, we could face service disruptions, be subject to legal claims and government action, experience an adverse effect on our reputation and need to incur significant additional costs to protect against similar information security breaches in the future, each of which could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.  Litigation resulting from such claims may be costly, time-consuming and distracting to management.  In addition, because of the critical nature of data security, any perceived breach of our security measures could cause existing or potential customers not to use our solutions and could harm our reputation.

We may experience service failures or interruptions due to defects in the hardware, software, infrastructure, third party components or processes that comprise our existing or new solutions, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Technology solutions as complex as ours may contain undetected defects in the hardware, software, infrastructure, third party components or processes that are part of the solutions we provide.  If these defects lead to service failures, we could experience delays or lost revenues, diversion of software engineering resources, materialnon-monetary concessions, negative media attention or increased service costs as a result of performance claims during the period required to correct the cause of the defects.  We cannot be certain that defects will not be found in new solutions or upgraded solutions, resulting in loss of, or delay in, market acceptance, which could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Because customers use our cloud-based supply chain management solutions for critical business processes, any defect in our solutions, any disruption to our solutions or any error in execution could cause recurring revenue customers to cancel their contracts with us, prevent potential customers from joining our network and harm our reputation.  Although most of our contracts with our customers limit our liability to our customers for these defects, disruptions or errors, we nonetheless could be subject to litigation for actual or alleged losses to our customers’ businesses, which may require us to spend significant time and money in litigation or arbitration or to pay significant settlements or damages.  We do not currently maintain any warranty reserves.  Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be costly and divert management’s attention and could cause our business to suffer.

The insurers under our existing liability insurance policy could deny coverage of a future claim that results from an error or defect in our technology or a resulting disruption in our solutions, or our existing liability insurance might not be adequate to cover all of the damages and other costs of such a claim.  Moreover, we cannot assure you that our current liability insurance coverage will continue to be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.  The successful assertion against us of one or more large claims that exceeds our insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in our liability insurance policy, including an increase in premiums or imposition of large deductible orco-insurance requirements, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.  Even if we succeed in litigation with respect to a claim, we are likely to incur substantial costs and our management’s attention will be diverted from our operations.

Our business is dependent on our ability to maintain and scale our technical infrastructure, and any failure to effectively maintain and grow our technical infrastructure service could damage our reputation, result in a potential loss of users and engagement, and adversely affect our financial results.

Our reputation and ability to attract, retain and serve our customers is dependent upon the reliable performance of our platformPlatform and our underlying technical infrastructure.  As our user base and the amount and

types of information shared on our platformPlatform continue to grow, we will need an increasing amount of technical infrastructure, including network capacity and computing power, to continue to satisfy the needs of our users.  It is possible that we may fail to effectively scale and grow our technical infrastructure to accommodate these increased demands.  Any failure to effectively maintain and grow our technical infrastructure could damage our reputation, result in a potential loss of users and engagement, and adversely affect our financial results.


Our inability to adapt to rapid technological change could impair our ability to remain competitive.

The industry in which we compete is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent introductions of new products and evolving industry standards.  Existing products can become obsolete and unmarketable when vendors introduce products utilizing new technologies or new industry standards emerge, and as a result, it is difficult for us to estimate the life cycles of our products.  Our ability to attract new customers and increase revenues from customers will depend in significant part on our ability to anticipate industry standards and to continue to enhance existing solutions or introduce or acquire new solutions on a timely basis to keep pace with technological developments.  The success of any enhancement or new solution depends on several factors, including the timely completion, introduction and market acceptance of the enhancement or solution.  Any new solution we develop or acquire might not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner and might not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenues.  If any of our competitors or new market entrants implement new technologies or upgrades to existing technologies before we are able to implement them, those competitorsthey may be able to provide more effective solutions than ours at lower prices.  Any delay or failure in the introduction of new or enhanced solutions could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, the development of new technologies requires substantial investment and we have no assurance that such investments will achieve their expected benefits on a timely manner or at all, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

If we fail to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights adequately, our business could be adversely affected.

We believe that proprietary technology is essential to establishing and maintaining our leadership position.  We seek to protect our intellectual property through trade secrets, copyrights, confidentiality,non-compete and nondisclosure agreements, trademarks, domain names and other measures, some of which afford only limited protection.  We do not have any patents or registered copyrights.  Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our technology or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.  We cannot assure you that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar or superior technology or design around our intellectual property.  In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as the laws of the United States of America.U.S.  Intellectual property protections may also be unavailable, limited or difficult to enforce in some countries, which could make it easier for competitors to capture market share.  Our failure to protect adequately our intellectual property and proprietary rights could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, if we resort to legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the intellectual property or other proprietary rights of others, the proceedings could be burdensome and expensive, even if we were to prevail.  Any litigation that is necessary in the future could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition.  

An assertion by a third party that we are infringing its intellectual property, whether or not correct, could subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses and our business might be harmed.

The Internet supply chain management and technology industries are characterized by the existence of a large number of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and by frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights.  As we seek to extend our solutions, we could be constrained by the intellectual property rights of others.


We might not prevail in any intellectual property infringement litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties in such litigation.  Defending such claims, regardless of their merit, could be time-consuming and distracting to management, result in costly litigation or settlement, cause development delays, require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements or require us to redesign our products to avoid infringement.  If our solutions violate any third-party proprietary rights, we could be required to withdraw those solutions from the market,re-develop those solutions or seek to obtain licenses from third parties, which might

not be available on reasonable terms or at all.  Any efforts tore-develop our solutions, obtain licenses from third parties on favorable terms or license a substitute technology might not be successful and, in any case, might substantially increase our costs and harm our business, financial condition and operating results.  Withdrawal of any of our solutions from the market might harm our business, financial condition and operating results.  We face additional risk of infringement or misappropriation claims if we hire an employee who possess third party proprietary information who decides to use such information in connection with our solution, services, or business processes without such third party’s authorization.

In addition, we incorporate open source software into our platform.Platform.  Given the nature of open source software, third parties might assert copyright and other intellectual property infringement claims against us based on our use of certain open source software programs.  The terms of many open source licenses to which we are subject have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, and there is a risk that those licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our solutions.  In that event, we could be required to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our solutions, tore-develop our solutions or to discontinue sales of our solutions, or to release our proprietary software code under the terms of an open source license, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Our industry is a prime target for those that seek to steal confidential information and computer malware, viruses, hacking and phishing attacks, and spamming could harm our business and cause us to lose the confidence of our users, which could significantly impact our business and results of operations.

As demonstrated by recent material and high-profile data security breaches within the retail industry, computer malware, viruses, and computer hacking and phishing attacks have become more prevalent in our industry, have occurred on our systems in the past, and may occur on our systems in the future. Furthermore, given the interconnected nature of the retail supply chain and our significant presence in the retail industry, we believe that we are a particularly attractive target for such attacks. In addition, our connection to the retail industry could present the opportunity for an attack on our system to serve as a way to obtain access into our users’ systems, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and growth prospectus. Businesses in our industry have experienced material sales declines after discovering data breaches, and our business could be similarly impacted. The security costs to reduce the likelihood of an attack are high and may continue to increase. Reputational value is based in large part on perceptions of subjective qualities. While reputations may take decades to build, any negative incidents can quickly erode trust and confidence, particularly if they result in adverse mainstream and social media publicity, governmental investigations or litigation. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of our products and technical infrastructure to the satisfaction of our users may harm our reputation, impair our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers and expose us to legal claims and government action, each of which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Our new products and changes to existing products could fail to attract or retain users or generate revenue.

Our ability to retain, increase and engage our customers and to increase our revenues will depend heavily on our ability to create successful new products.  We may introduce significant changes to our existing products or develop and introduce new and unproven products which include or use technologies with which we have little or no prior development or operating experience.  If new or enhanced products fail to engage customers, we may fail to attract or retain customers or to generate sufficient revenues, operating margin, or other value to justify our investments and our business may be adversely affected.  In the future, we may invest in new products and initiatives to generate revenue, but there is no guarantee these approaches will be successful.  If we are not successful with new approaches to monetization, we may not be able to maintain or grow our revenues as anticipated or recover any associated development costs and our financial results could be adversely affected.

Our software is highly technical, and if it contains undetected errors, our business could be adversely affected.

Our products incorporate software that is highly technical and complex.  Our software has contained, and may now or in the future contain, undetected errors, bugs or vulnerabilities.  Some errors in our software code

may only be discovered after the code has been released.  Any defects or errors discovered in our code after release could result in damage to our reputation, loss of customers, loss of revenue or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.

The market for cloud-based supply chain management solutions is at an early stage of development.  If this market does not develop or develops more slowly than we expect, our revenues may decline or fail to grow and we may incur operating losses.

We derive, and expect to continue to derive, substantially all of our revenues from providing cloud-based supply chain management solutions to suppliers, retailers, distributors and logistics firms.  The market for cloud-based supply chain management solutions is in an early stage of development, and it is uncertain whether these solutions will achieve and sustain high levels of demand and market acceptance.  Our success will depend on the willingness of retailers and their trading partners to accept our cloud-based supply chain management solutions as an alternative to traditional licensed hardware and software solutions.


Some suppliers, retailers, distributors, or logistics firms may be reluctant or unwilling to use our cloud-based supply chain management solutions for a number of reasons, including existing investments in supply chain management technology.  Supply chain management functions traditionally have been performed using purchased or licensed hardware and software implemented by each supplier.  Because this traditional approach often requires significant initial investments to purchase the necessary technology and to establish systems that comply with retailers’ unique requirements, suppliers may be unwilling to abandon their current solutions for our cloud-based supply chain management solutions.

Other factors that may limit market acceptance of our cloud-based supply chain management solutions include:

our ability to maintain high levels of customer satisfaction;

our ability to maintain continuity of service for all users of our platform;Platform;

the price, performance and availability of competing solutions; and

our ability to assuage suppliers’ confidentiality concerns about information stored outside of their controlled computing environments.

If retailers and their trading partners do not perceive the benefits of our cloud-based supply chain management solutions, or if retailers and their trading partners are unwilling to accept our platformPlatform as an alternative to the traditional approach, the market for our solutions might not continue to develop or might develop more slowly than we expect, either of which would significantly adversely affect our revenues and growth prospects.

Privacy concerns and laws, evolving regulation of cloud computing, cross-border data transfer restrictions and other domestic or foreign regulations may limit the use and adoption of our solutions and adversely affect our business.

Regulation related to the provision of services on the Internet is increasing, as federal, state and foreign governments continue to adopt new laws and regulations addressing data privacy and the collection, processing, storage and use of personal information.  In some cases, foreign data privacy laws and regulations, such as the European Union’s Data Protection Directive, and the country-specific regulations that implement that directive, also govern the processing of personal information.  Further, laws are increasingly aimed at the use of personal information for marketing purposes, such as the European Union’se-Privacy Directive, and the country-specific regulations that implement that directive.  Such laws and regulations are subject to differing interpretations and may be inconsistent among jurisdictions.  These and other requirements could reduce demand for our solutions or restrict our ability to store and process data or, in some cases, impact our ability to offer our services and solutions in certain locations.

In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy and other industry groups have established or may establish new self-regulatory standards that may place additional burdens on us.  Our customers may expect us to meet voluntary certification or other standards established by third parties.  If we are unable to maintain these certifications or meet these standards, it could adversely affect our ability to provide our solutions to certain customers and could harm our business.

The costs of compliance with and other burdens imposed by laws, regulations and standards may limit the use and adoption of our services and reduce overall demand for them, or lead to significant fines, penalties or liabilities for any noncompliance.

Furthermore, concerns regarding data privacy may cause our customers’ customers to resist providing the data necessary to allow our customers to use our service effectively.  Even the perception that the privacy of personal information is not satisfactorily protected or does not meet regulatory requirements could inhibit sales of our products or services and could limit adoption of our cloud-based solutions.


Evolving regulation of the Internet may increase our expenditures related to compliance efforts, which may adversely affect our financial condition.

As Internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal, state or foreign agencies becomes more likely.  We are particularly sensitive to these risks because the Internet is a critical component of our cloud-based business model.  For example, we believe that increased regulation is likely in the area of data privacy, and laws and regulations applying to the solicitation, collection, processing or use of personal or consumer information could affect our customers’ ability to use and share data, potentially reducing demand for solutions accessed via the Internet and restricting our ability to store, process and share data with our clients via the Internet.  In addition, taxation of services provided over the Internet or other charges imposed by government agencies or by private organizations for accessing the Internet may be imposed.  Any regulation imposing greater fees for Internet use or restricting information exchange over the Internet could result in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of Internet-based services, which could harm our business.

Industry-specific regulation is evolving and unfavorable industry-specific laws, regulations or interpretive positions could harm our business.

Our customers and potential customers do business in a variety of industries.  Regulators in certain industries have adopted and may in the future adopt regulations or interpretive positions regarding the use of cloud computing and other outsourced services.  The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, industry-specific laws, regulations and interpretive positions may limit customers’ use and adoption of our services and reduce overall demand for our services.  In addition, an inability to satisfy the standards of certain voluntary third-party certification bodies that our customers may expect may have an adverse impact on our business.  If in the future we are unable to achieve or maintain these industry-specific certifications or other requirements or standards relevant to our customers, it may harm our business.

In some cases, industry-specific laws, regulations or interpretive positions may also apply directly to us as a service provider.  Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with such requirements could have an adverse impact on our business.

We rely on third party infrastructure, software and services that could take a significant time to replace or upgrade.

We rely on infrastructure, software and services licensed from third parties to offer our cloud-based supply chain management solutions.  This infrastructure, software and services, as well as maintenance rights for this infrastructure, software and services, may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.  If we lose the right to use or upgrade any of these licenses, our customers could experience delays or be unable to access our solutions until we can obtain and integrate equivalent technology.  There might not always

be commercially reasonable hardware or software alternatives to the third-party infrastructure, software and services that we currently license.  Any such alternatives could be more difficult or costly to replace than the third-party infrastructure, software and services we currently license, and integration of the alternatives into our platformPlatform could require significant work and substantial time and resources.  Any delays or failures associated with our platformPlatform could injure our reputation with customers and potential customers and result in an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may pursue acquisitions and our potential inability to successfully integrate newly acquired companies or businesses could adversely affect our financial results.

We may pursue acquisitions of other companies or their businesses in the future.  If we complete acquisitions, we face many risks commonly encountered with growth through acquisitions.  These risks include:

incurring significantly higher than anticipated capital expenditures and operating expenses;

failing to assimilate the operations, customers, and personnel of the acquired company or business;

disrupting our ongoing business;

dissipating our management resources;

dilution to existing stockholders from the issuance of equity securities;


 

dilution to existing stockholders from the issuance of equity securities;

liabilities or other problems associated with the acquired business;

incurring debt on terms unfavorable to us or that we are unable to repay;

becoming subject to adverse tax consequences, substantial depreciation or deferred compensation charges;

improper compliance with laws and regulations;

failing to maintain uniform standards, controls and policies; and

impairing relationships with employees and customers as a result of changes in management.

Fully integrating an acquired company or business into our operations may take a significant amount of time. In addition, we may only be able to conduct limited due diligence on an acquired company’s operations.  Following an acquisition, we may be subject to liabilities arising from an acquired company’s past or present operations, including liabilities related to data security, encryption and privacy of customer data, and these liabilities may be greater than the warranty and indemnity limitations that we negotiate. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered with acquisitions.  To the extent we do not successfully avoid or overcome the risks or problems related to any acquisitions, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.  Future acquisitions also could impact our financial position and capital needs, and could cause substantial fluctuations in our quarterly and yearly results of operations.  Acquisitions could include significant goodwill and intangible assets, which may result in future impairment charges that would reduce our stated earnings.

Because our long-term success depends, in part, on our ability to expand the sales of our solutions to customers located outside of the United States ofNorth America, our business will be susceptible to risks associated with international operations.

We have limited experience operating in foreign jurisdictions. Customers in countries outside of North America accounted for 6%, 6%, and 3% of our revenues for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. In 2014, we purchased substantially all of the assets of Leadtec, a privately-held provider of cloud-based integration solutions in Australia and New Zealand and in 2016, we acquired all the shares of Toolbox Solutions, Inc., a privately-held provider of cloud-based analytic solutions, which is based in Canada. We also undertake software development activities in the Ukraine. Our inexperience in operating our business outside of North America increases the risk that our current and any future international expansion efforts will not be successful.  Conducting international operations subjects us to new risks that, generally, we have not faced in the United StatesU.S., including:

misjudging the markets and competitive landscape of America, including:foreign jurisdictions;

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

unexpected changes in foreign regulatory requirements;

longer accounts receivable payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;

difficulties in managing and staffing international operations;

differing technology standards;

potentially adverse tax consequences, including the complexities of foreign value added tax systems and restrictions on the repatriation of earnings;

localization of our solutions, including translation into foreign languages and associated expenses;

the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and different legal standards, including laws and regulations related to privacy;

increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities;

political, social and economic instability abroad, (including the current hostilities in Ukraine), terrorist attacks and security concerns in general;

greater potential for corruption and bribery; and

reduced or varied protection for intellectual property rights in some countries.


The occurrence of any one of these risks could negatively affect our international business and, consequently, our results of operations generally.  Additionally, operating in international markets also requires significant management attention and financial resources.  We cannot be certain that the investment and additional resources required in establishing, acquiring or integrating operations in other countries will produce desired levels of revenues or profitability.

In addition, we operate in parts of the world, such as Ukraine, that are recognized as having governmental corruption problems to some degree and where local customs and practices may not foster strict compliance with anti-corruption laws.  Our continued operation and potential expansion outside the United StatesU.S. could increase the risk of such violations in the future.  Despite our training and compliance programs, we cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from unauthorized reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents.agents, including by third parties we utilize in foreign jurisdictions. In the event that we believe, or have reason to believe, that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management.  Violations of these laws may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, which could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations or financial condition.

The use of open source software in our products may expose us to additional risks and harm our intellectual property.

Some of our products use or incorporate software that is subject to one or more open source licenses.  Open source software is typically freely accessible, usable and modifiable.  Certain open source software licenses require a user who intends to distribute the open source software as a component of the user’s software to disclose publicly part or all of the source code to the user’s software.  In addition, certain open source software licenses require the user of such software to make any derivative works of the open source code available to others on unfavorable terms or at no cost.  This can subject previously proprietary software to open source license terms.  Furthermore, if we fail to comply with these licenses, we may be subject to certain conditions, includingunfavorable requirements. These requirements that we offermay include, but are not limited to, offering our services that incorporate the open source software for no cost, that we makemaking available any of our modifications to the source code, for modifications ormaking available any derivative works we create based upon, incorporating, or using the open source software, and that we licenseor licensing such modifications or alterationsderivative works under the terms of the particular open source license. If an author or third party that distributes such open source software were to allege that we had not complied with the conditions of one or more of these licenses, we could be required to incur significant legal

expenses defending against such allegations and could be subject to significant damages, enjoined from the sale of our services that contained the open source software and required to comply with the foregoing conditions, which could disrupt the distribution and sale of some of our services.

While we monitor the use of all open source software in our products, processes and technology and try to ensure that no open source software is used in such a way as to require us to disclose the source code to the related product or solution, such use could inadvertently occur.  Additionally, if a third-party software provider has incorporated certain types of open source software into software we license from such third party for our products and solutions, we could, under certain circumstances, be required to disclose the source code to our products and solutions.  This could harm our intellectual property position and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

Our operations may be adversely affected by ongoing developments in Ukraine.

The political and civil situation in Ukraine has been undergoing heightened political turmoilcannot be accurately predicted since the removal of President  Yanukovych from power by the Ukrainian parliament in late February 2014, which was followed by reports of Russian military activity in the Crimean region.  The situation in Ukraine is rapidly developingUkraine’s political activities remain fluid and webeyond our control.  We also cannot predict the outcome of developments there or the reaction to such developments by U.S., European, U.N. or other international authorities.

We currently engage in software development activities in the Ukraine and have an office in Kiev with 60 employees. We relocated our office to Kiev from Kharkiv due, in part, to the hostilities.Kiev.  We continue to monitor the situation closely. We have no way to predict the progress or outcome of the situation, as the political and civil unrest and reported military activities are fluid and beyond our control.  Prolonged or expanded unrest, military activities, or broad-based sanctions, should they be implemented, could have a material adverse effect on our operations.operations


We have incurred operating losses in the past and may incur operating losses in the future.

We began operating our supply chain management solution business in 1997.  Throughout most of our history, we have experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations.  As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had retained earnings of $15.3 million compared to an accumulated deficit of $33.7 million.$8.6 million as of December 31, 2017.  We expect our operating expenses to continue to increase in the future as we expand our operations and increase our customer base due to expected increased sales and marketing expenses, operations costs, research and development costs and general and administration costs.  If our revenues do not continue to grow to offset these increased expenses, we may not be profitable.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain profitability.  You should not consider recent revenue growth as indicative of our future performance.  In fact, in future periods, we may not have any revenue growth, or our revenues could decline.  In addition, our ability to achieve profitability is subject to a number of the risks and uncertainties, including those discussed herein, many of which are beyond our control.

Our ability to use our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards might be limited.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had net operating loss carryforwards of $70.7$37.5 million for U.S. federal tax purposes.  We also had $19.2$3.2 million of various state net operating loss carryforwards.  The net operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes will expire between 20192020 and 20362038 if not utilized.  The net operating loss carryforwards for state tax purposes will expire between 20172019 and 20362031 if not utilized.  To the extent these net operating loss carryforwards are available, we intend to use them to reduce the corporate income tax liability associated with our operations.  Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that might be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in stock ownership.  We have performed a Section 382 analysis for the time period from our inception through December 8, 2010.  During this time period, it was determined that we had six separate ownership changes under Section 382.  We have not updated the Section 382 analysis subsequent to December 8, 2010; however, we believe there have not been any events subsequent to that date that would materially impact

the analysis.  We believe that approximately $17.6 million of federal losses will expire unused due to Section 382 limitations.  The maximum annual limitation of federal net operating losses under Section 382 is approximately $990,000.$1.0 million.  This limitation could be further restricted if any ownership changes occur in future years.  To the extent our use of net operating loss carryforwards is significantly limited, our taxable income could be subject to corporate income tax earlier than it would if we were able to use net operating loss carryforwards, which could result in lower profits.

Unanticipated changes in effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income or other tax returns could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and various foreign jurisdictions, and our domestic and international tax liabilities will be subject to the allocation of expenses in differing jurisdictions. Our future effective tax rates could be subject to volatility or adversely affected by a number of factors, including:

changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities ;

expected timing and amount of the release of tax valuation allowances ;

expiration of, or detrimental changes in, research and development tax credit laws;

tax effects of stock-based compensation;

costs related to intercompany restructurings;

changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof; and

future earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated earnings in countries where we have higher statutory tax rates.

In addition, we may be subject to audits of our income and sales taxes by the Internal Revenue Service and other foreign and state tax authorities. Outcomes from these audits could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.


The markets in which we participate are highly competitive, and our failure to compete successfully would make it difficult for us to add and retain customers and would reduce or impede the growth of our business.

The markets for supply chain management solutions are increasingly competitive and global.  We expect competition to increase in the future both from existing competitors and new companies that may enter our markets.  Increased competition could result in pricing pressure, reduced sales, lower margins or the failure of our solutions to achieve or maintain broad market acceptance.  We face competition from:

cloud service providers that deliverbusiness-to-business information systems using a multi-tenant approach;

traditionalon-premise software providers; and

managed service providers that combine traditionalon-premise software with professional information technology services.

To remain competitive, we will need to invest continuously in software development, marketing, customer service and support and product delivery infrastructure.  However, we cannot assure you that new or established competitors will not offer solutions that are superior to or lower in price than ours.  We may not have sufficient resources to continue the investments in all areas of software development and marketing needed to maintain our competitive position.  In addition, some of our competitors are better capitalized than us, which may provide them with an advantage in developing, marketing or servicing new solutions.  Increased competition could reduce our market share, revenues and operating margins, increase our costs of operations and otherwise adversely affect our business.

Mergers or other strategic transactions involving our competitors could weaken our competitive position, which could harm our operating results.

Our industry is highly fragmented, and we believe it is likely that our existing competitors will continue to consolidate or will be acquired.  In addition, some of our competitors may enter into new alliances with each other or may establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with systems integrators, third-party consulting firms or other parties.  New entrants not currently considered to be competitors may also enter the market through acquisitions, partnerships, or strategic relationships.  Any such consolidation, acquisition, alliance or cooperative relationship could lead to pricing pressure, loss of customers and our loss of market share and could result in a competitor with greater financial, technical, marketing, service and other resources, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Economic weakness and uncertainty could adversely affect our revenue, lengthen our sales cycles and make it difficult for us to forecast operating results accurately.

Our revenues depend significantly on general economic conditions and the health of retailers.  Economic weakness and constrained retail spending adversely affected revenue growth rates in late 2008 and similar circumstances may result in slower growth, or reductions, in revenues and gross profits in the future.  We have experienced, and may experience in the future, reduced spending in our business due to financial turmoil affecting the U.S. and global economy, and other macroeconomic factors affecting spending behavior.  Uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult for us to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments.  In addition, economic conditions or uncertainty may cause customers and potential customers to reduce or delay technology purchases, including purchases of our solutions.  Our sales cycle may lengthen if purchasing decisions are delayed as a result of uncertain information technology or

development budgets or contract negotiations become more protracted or difficult as customers institute additional internal approvals for information technology purchases.  Delays or reductions in information technology spending could have a material adverse effect on demand for our solutions, and consequently our results of operations, prospects and stock price.


Our continued growth could strain our personnel resources and infrastructure, and if we are unable to implement appropriate controls and procedures to manage our growth, we will not be able to implement our business plan successfully.

We have experienced a period of rapid growth in our headcount and operations.  To the extent that we are able to sustain such growth, it willmight place a significant strain on our management, administrative, operational and financial infrastructure.  Our success will depend in part upon the ability of our senior management to manage this growth effectively.  To do so, we must continue to hire, train and manage new employees as needed.  If our new hires perform poorly, or if we are unsuccessful in hiring, training, managing and integrating these new employees, or if we are not successful in retaining our existing employees, or if our culture is adversely affected by any of the foregoing, our business would be harmed.  To manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures.  The additional headcount we are adding will increase our cost base, which will make it more difficult for us to offset any future revenue shortfalls by reducing expenses in the short term.  If we fail to successfully manage our growth, we will be unable to execute our business plan.

If we fail to retain our Chief Executive Officer and other key personnel, our business would be harmed and we might not be able to implement our business plan successfully.

Given the complex nature of the technology on which our business is based and the speed with which such technology advances, our future success is dependent, in large part, upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, technical and sales personnel.  The loss of any member of our senior management team or key personnel might significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives and could materially harm our business and our customer relationships.  In addition, because of the nature of our business, the loss of any significant number of our existing engineering, project management and sales personnel could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  Competition for talented personnel is intense, and we cannot be certain that we can retain our managerial, technical and sales personnel or that we can attract, assimilate or retain such personnel in the future.  Our inability to attract and retain such personnel could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our failure to maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or to prevent or detect material misstatements in our annual or interim financial statements in the future could result in inaccurate financial reporting, or could otherwise harm our business.business and stock price.

Ensuring that we have internal financial and accounting controls and procedures adequate to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to bere-evaluated frequently.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.  In particular, we are required to perform annual system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management and our independent registered public accounting firm to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  Furthermore, implementing any appropriate future changes to our internal control over financial reporting may entail substantial costs in order to modify our existing accounting systems, may take a significant period of time to complete and may distract our officers, directors and employees from the operation of our business.  If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in the future, or if material weaknesses are identified, the market price of our common stock could decline.


Our failure to raise additional capital or generate cash flows necessary to expand our operations and invest in new technologies could reduce our ability to compete successfully and adversely affect our results of operations.

We may need to raise additional funds, and we may not be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, if at all.  If we raise additional equity financing, our security holders may experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the value of shares of our common stock could decline.  If we engage in debt financing, we may be required to accept terms that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness, force us to maintain specified liquidity or other ratios or restrict our ability to pay dividends or make acquisitions.  If we need additional capital and cannot raise it on acceptable terms, we may not be able to, among other things:

develop and enhance our solutions;

continue to expand our technology development, sales and marketing organizations;

acquire complementary technologies, products or businesses;

hire, train and retain employees; or

respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated working capital requirements.

Our inability to do any of the foregoing could reduce our ability to compete successfully and adversely affect our results of operations.

If the open source, community expandsor other no-cost products and services, expand into enterprise application and supply chain software, our fee revenues may decline.

The open source community is comprised of many different formal and informal groups of software developers and individuals who have created a wide variety of software and have made that software available for use, distribution and modification, often free of charge.  Open source software, such as the Linux operating system, has been gaining in popularity among business users.  If developers contribute enterprise and supply chain application software to the open source community, or if competitors make such software available at no cost, and that software has competitive features and scale to support business users in our markets, we may need to change our product pricing and distribution strategy to compete successfully, and our fee revenues may decline as a result.

Our stock price may be volatile.

Shares of our common stock were sold in our April 2010 initial public offering at a price of $12.00 per share and through December 31, 2016,2018, our common stock has traded as high as $79.98$100.68 per share and as low as $8.45 per share.  An active, liquid and orderly market for our common stock may not be sustained, which could depress the trading price of our common stock.  Some of the factors that may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate include:

fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;

fluctuations in our recorded revenue, even during periods of significant sales order activity;

fluctuations in stock market volume;

changes in estimates of our financial results or recommendations by securities analysts;

failure of any of our solutions to achieve or maintain market acceptance;

changes in market valuations of similar companies;

success of competitive products or services;

changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of debt;

announcements by us or our competitors of significant solutions, contracts, acquisitions or strategic alliances;

regulatory developments in the United States of America, foreign countries or both;


 

regulatory developments in the United States of America, foreign countries or both;

litigation involving our company, our general industry or both;

additions or departures of key personnel;

investors’ general perception of us; and

changes in general economic, industry and market conditions.

In addition, if the market for software stocks or the stock market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of operations.  If any of the foregoing occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us to class action lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be costly to defend and a distraction to management.

If securities or industry analysts cease publishing research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business.  If one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes incorrect or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline.  In addition, if one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

Future sales of our common stock by our existing stockholders could cause our stock price to decline.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the market price of our common stock could decrease significantly.  The perception in the public market that our stockholders might sell shares of our common stock could also depress the market price of our common stock.  As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had approximately 3.95.3 million shares of our common stock issuable under approved equity compensation plans which are covered by effective registration statements.

Our charter documents and Delaware law may delay, discourage, or inhibit a takeover that stockholders consider favorable.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and applicable provisions of Delaware law may delay, discourage, or discourageinhibit transactions involving an actual or potential change in our control or change in our management, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares, or transactions that our stockholders might otherwise deem to be in their best interests, and may ultimately result in the market price of our common stock being lower than it would be without these provisions.  These provisions:

permit our board of directors to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, with any rights, preferences and privileges as our board may designate, including the right to approve an acquisition or other change in our control;

provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed by resolution of the board of directors;

provide that all vacancies, including newly created directorships, may, except as otherwise required by law, be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum;

provide that stockholders seeking to present proposals before a meeting of stockholders or to nominate candidates for election as directors at a meeting of stockholders must provide notice in writing in a timely manner, and also specify requirements as to the form and content of a stockholder’s notice; and

do not provide for cumulative voting rights.


In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally limits our ability to engage in any business combination with certain persons who own 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or any of our associates or affiliates who at any time in the past three years have owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock.  These provisions may have the effect of entrenching our management team and may deprive you of the opportunity to sell your shares to potential acquirers at a premium over prevailing prices.  This potential inability to obtain a control premium could reduce the price of our common stock.

We do not intend to declare dividends on our stock in the foreseeable future.

We currently intend to retain all future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.  Investors may need to sell all or part of their holdings of our common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment.  Any payment of future cash dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.  Therefore, you should not expect to receive dividend income from shares of our common stock.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.

Properties

Our corporate headquarters, including our principal administrative, marketing, sales, technical support and research and development facilities, are located in Minneapolis, MNMinnesota where we lease approximately 166,000189,000 square feet under an agreement that expires on April 30, 2025.  We have agreed to expand our headquarters premises by approximately 25,000 square feet during 2020. Our current lease agreement also includes a further expansion right and a right of first offer to lease certain additional space and two options to extend the term of the lease for five years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease.

We also have operations in or near:

Little Falls, New Jersey, where we lease approximately 26,000 square feet under an agreement that expires on June 30, 2023.  The lease includes a right of first offer to lease certain additional space whichand one option to extend the term of the lease for five years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease.

Toronto, Ontario, where we exercised,lease approximately 17,000 square feet under an agreement that expires on December 31, 2021.  The lease includes a right of first offer to lease certain additional space and two optionsone option to extend the term of the lease for five years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease.

Melbourne, Australia, where we lease approximately 11,000 square feet under an agreement that expires on October 15, 2021.  The lease includes one option to extend the term of the lease for three years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease.

We also have operations in or near:

Little Falls, New Jersey,Houston, Texas, where we lease approximately 26,0004,600 square feet under an agreement that expires on June 30, 2023;January 31, 2022. The lease includes a right of first offer to lease certain additional spaces and one option to extend the term of the lease for up to three years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease.

Toronto, Ontario,Sydney, Australia, where we lease approximately 17,0004,000 square feet under an agreement that expires on December 31, 2021;April 30, 2020.  The lease includes a right of first offer to lease certain additional space and one option to extend the term of the lease for three years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease.

Melbourne, Australia,Kiev, Ukraine, where we lease approximately 11,0003,000 square feet under an agreement that expires on October 15, 2021.April 26, 2020.  The lease includes one option to extend the term of the lease for two years and 11 months at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease.


We believe that our current facilities are suitable and adequate to meet our current needs and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate expansion of our operations.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings.  From time to time, we may be named as a defendant in legal actions or otherwise be subject to claims arising from our normal business activities.  We believe that we have obtained adequate insurance coverage or rights to indemnification in connection with potential legal proceedings that may arise.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information.  Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “SPSC” since April 22, 2010, the date of our initial public offering.  The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market.

   High   Low 

Fiscal 2015

    

First Quarter

  $70.38    $52.83  

Second Quarter

  $72.84    $63.54  

Third Quarter

  $77.80    $65.17  

Fourth Quarter

  $78.29    $65.43  

Fiscal 2016

    

First Quarter

  $69.48    $38.35  

Second Quarter

  $60.72    $40.94  

Third Quarter

  $74.85    $58.91  

Fourth Quarter

  $73.92    $61.40  

Stockholders of Record.  As of February 10, 2017,8, 2019, we had 76 stockholders of record of our common stock, excluding holders whose stock is held either in nominee name and/or street name brokerage accounts.

Dividends.Dividends.  We have not historically paid dividends on our common stock.  We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and, therefore, we do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.  Payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs, outstanding indebtedness and plans for expansion and restrictions imposed by lenders, if any.

Stock Performance Graph and Cumulative Total Return

Notwithstanding any statement to the contrary in any of our previous or future filings with the SEC, the following information relating to the price performance of our common stock shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the SEC or to be “soliciting material” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the (“Exchange Act,Act”), and it shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the (“Securities ActAct”) of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return of our common stock with that of the NASDAQNasdaq US Benchmark TR Index and the NASDAQNasdaq US Benchmark Computer Services TR Index from December 30, 201131, 2013 through December 30, 2016,31, 2018, utilizing the last trading day of each respective year.  The graph assumes that $100 was invested in shares of our common stock, the NASDAQNasdaq US Benchmark TR Index and the NASDAQNasdaq US Benchmark Computer Services TR Index at the close of market on December 30, 2011,31, 2013, and that dividends, if any, were reinvested.  The comparisons in this graph are based on historical data and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of future performance of our common stock.


Comparison of Cumulative Total Returns of SPS Commerce, Inc., NASDAQNasdaq US Benchmark TR Index and

NASDAQNasdaq US Benchmark Computer Services TR Index

 

   SPS Commerce  NASDAQ US
Benchmark
TR Index
  NASDAQ US
Benchmark Computer
Services TR Index
 

12/30/2011

  100.0    100.0    100.0  

6/29/2012

  117.1    109.4    109.0  

12/31/2012

  143.6    116.4    110.1  

6/28/2013

  211.9    132.9    110.8  

12/31/2013

  251.6    155.4    119.0  

6/30/2014

  243.5    166.3    116.8  

12/31/2014

  218.2    174.8    113.2  

6/30/2015

  253.6    178.1    119.3  

12/31/2015

  270.6    175.6    110.8  

6/30/2016

  233.5    182.3    115.6  

12/30/2016

  269.3    198.5    177.6  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nasdaq US

 

 

Nasdaq US

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benchmark

 

 

Benchmark Computer

 

 

 

SPS Commerce

 

 

TR Index

 

 

Services TR Index

 

12/31/2013

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

 

 

100.0

 

12/31/2014

 

 

86.7

 

 

 

112.5

 

 

 

95.2

 

12/31/2015

 

 

107.5

 

 

 

113.0

 

 

 

93.2

 

12/30/2016

 

 

107.0

 

 

 

127.7

 

 

 

149.3

 

12/29/2017

 

 

74.4

 

 

 

155.0

 

 

 

120.9

 

12/31/2018

 

 

126.2

 

 

 

146.6

 

 

 

110.6

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Sales of Registered Securities

Not applicable.

Stock RepurchasesPurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.On November 2, 2017, our board of directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of common stock.  Under the program, purchases may be made from time to time in the open market over two years.  We repurchased 289,745 shares at a cost of $19.9 million and 122,147 shares at a cost of $5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  As of December 31, 2018, $24.3 million of the $50.0 million of the share repurchases authorized was available for future share repurchases.


The following table presents the total number of shares of our common stock that we purchased during the fourth quarter of 2018, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that we purchased as part of our publicly announced repurchase program and the approximate dollar value of shares that still could be repurchased at the end of the applicable period.

 

Period

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

 

 

Average Price Paid per Share

 

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program

 

 

Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program

 

October 1-31, 2018

 

 

70,100

 

 

$

85.59

 

 

 

70,100

 

 

$

24,300,000

 

November 1-30, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,300,000

 

December 1 - 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24,300,000

 

Total fourth quarter 2018

 

 

70,100

 

 

$

85.59

 

 

 

70,100

 

 

$

24,300,000

 

See Note K to our consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional information regarding our stock repurchase program.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data should be read together with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes and with“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.  Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.

The statements of income data for each of the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the operating data relating to Adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP income per diluted share for each of the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The statements of income data for the years ended December 31, 2015, and 2014, the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2015,2014, and the operating data relating to Adjusted EBITDA andnon-GAAP income per diluted share for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 have been derived from our audited annual consolidated financial statements, which are included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.

The statements of income data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and the operating data relating to Adjusted EBITDA andnon-GAAP income per diluted share for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 have been derived from our audited annual consolidated financial statements which are not included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, but which have been included in prior Annual Reports on Form10-K filed with the SEC.  These statements do not reflect our adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Other Assets and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers (Subtopic 340-40).

Adjusted EBITDA andnon-GAAP income per diluted share arenon-GAAP financial measures.  We believe that thesenon-GAAP measures provide useful information to management and investors regarding certain financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations.  Our management uses thesenon-GAAP measures to compare the company’s performance to that of prior periods for trend analyses and planning purposes.  Adjusted EBITDA is also used for purposes of determining executive and senior management incentive compensation.  These measures are also presented to our board of directors.

Thesenon-GAAP measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.America (“GAAP”).  Thesenon-GAAP financial measures exclude significant expenses and income that are required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”)GAAP to be recorded in the company’s financial statements and are subject to inherent limitations.  Investors should review the reconciliations of thesenon-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures that are included below.


The operating data relating to recurring revenue customers for all periods presented is unaudited and has been derived from our internal records of our operations.

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

  (In thousands, except per share data) 

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

Statements of Income Data

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

  $193,295   $158,518   $127,947   $104,391   $77,106  

 

$

248,240

 

 

$

220,085

 

 

$

193,153

 

 

$

158,518

 

 

$

127,947

 

Cost of revenues(1)

   64,346    50,043    39,991    31,781    22,040  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cost of revenues (1)

 

 

81,748

 

 

$

73,625

 

 

$

64,346

 

 

 

50,043

 

 

 

39,991

 

Gross profit

   128,949    108,475    87,956    72,610    55,066  

 

 

166,492

 

 

 

146,460

 

 

 

128,807

 

 

 

108,475

 

 

 

87,956

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing(1)

   65,886    55,374    46,990    39,621    30,037  

Research and development(1)

   21,981    17,954    13,494    10,870    8,166  

General and administrative(1)

   28,827    24,817    20,233    17,189    13,524  

Amortization of intangible assets(2)

   4,738    3,307    2,856    3,158    1,767  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Sales and marketing (1)

 

 

71,719

 

 

 

71,261

 

 

 

66,876

 

 

 

55,374

 

 

 

46,990

 

Research and development (1)

 

 

22,087

 

 

 

23,183

 

 

 

21,981

 

 

 

17,954

 

 

 

13,494

 

General and administrative (1)

 

 

41,862

 

 

 

37,461

 

 

 

28,827

 

 

 

24,817

 

 

 

20,233

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

4,093

 

 

 

4,574

 

 

 

4,738

 

 

 

3,307

 

 

 

2,856

 

Total operating expenses

   121,432    101,452    83,573    70,838    53,494  

 

 

139,761

 

 

 

136,479

 

 

 

122,422

 

 

 

101,452

 

 

 

83,573

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

   7,517    7,023    4,383    1,772    1,572  

 

 

26,731

 

 

 

9,981

 

 

 

6,385

 

 

 

7,023

 

 

 

4,383

 

Other income (expense)

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income, net

   601    197    187    112    19  

 

 

2,329

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

601

 

 

 

197

 

 

 

187

 

Other income (expense), net(3)

   732    (145  (458  (147  (248
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other income (expense), net

 

 

(720

)

 

 

(320

)

 

 

732

 

 

 

(145

)

 

 

(458

)

Total other income (expense), net

   1,333    52    (271  (35  (229

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

712

 

 

 

1,333

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

(271

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before income taxes

   8,850    7,075    4,112    1,737    1,343  

 

 

28,340

 

 

 

10,693

 

 

 

7,718

 

 

 

7,075

 

 

 

4,112

 

Income tax expense

   (3,140  (2,436  (1,408  (686  (121

 

 

4,468

 

 

 

10,342

 

 

 

2,755

 

 

 

2,436

 

 

 

1,408

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

  $5,710   $4,639   $2,704   $1,051   $1,222  

 

$

23,872

 

 

$

351

 

 

$

4,963

 

 

$

4,639

 

 

$

2,704

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

  $0.34   $0.28   $0.17   $0.07   $0.09  

 

$

1.39

 

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

0.28

 

 

$

0.17

 

Diluted

  $0.33   $0.27   $0.16   $0.07   $0.09  

 

$

1.36

 

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

0.27

 

 

$

0.16

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

   16,947    16,565    16,236    15,201    13,056  

 

 

17,196

 

 

 

17,183

 

 

 

16,947

 

 

 

16,565

 

 

 

16,236

 

Diluted

   17,241    17,032    16,814    15,931    13,910  

 

 

17,606

 

 

 

17,356

 

 

 

17,241

 

 

 

17,032

 

 

 

16,814

 

 

  As of December 31, 

 

As of December 31,

 

  2016   2015   2014   2013   2012 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

  (In thousands) 

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance Sheet Data

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $115,877    $121,538    $130,795    $131,294    $66,050  

 

$

133,859

 

 

$

123,127

 

 

$

115,877

 

 

$

121,538

 

 

$

130,795

 

Working capital

   153,772     142,552     137,634     137,160     77,040  

 

 

193,093

 

 

 

180,386

 

 

 

156,359

 

 

 

142,552

 

 

 

137,634

 

Total assets

   298,229     261,731     243,775     223,330     159,201  

 

 

386,123

 

 

 

339,738

 

 

 

300,080

 

 

 

261,731

 

 

 

243,775

 

Long-term liabilities

   16,937     15,312     14,124     11,642     9,913  

 

 

10,627

 

 

 

7,682

 

 

 

8,721

 

 

 

15,312

 

 

 

14,124

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   249,267     222,185     205,091     192,773     134,817  

Total stockholders' equity

 

 

318,974

 

 

 

288,111

 

 

 

257,767

 

 

 

222,185

 

 

 

205,091

 

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2016   2015   2014   2013   2012 
   (Unaudited, adjusted EBITDA in thousands) 

Operating Data

          

Adjusted EBITDA(4)

  $26,502    $22,620    $18,160    $13,774    $8,997  

Non-GAAP income per diluted share(5)

  $1.01    $0.84    $0.65    $0.53    $0.41  

Recurring revenue customers(6)

   24,805     23,410     21,983     19,690     17,977  

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

 

(Unaudited, adjusted EBITDA in thousands)

 

Operating Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA (2)

 

$

51,301

 

 

$

34,170

 

 

$

25,370

 

 

$

22,620

 

 

$

18,160

 

Non-GAAP income per diluted share with tax adjustments (3)

 

$

1.93

 

 

$

1.02

 

 

$

0.68

 

 

$

0.63

 

 

$

0.48

 

Recurring revenue customers (4)

 

 

29,308

 

 

 

25,751

 

 

 

24,805

 

 

 

23,410

 

 

 

21,983

 

________________

(1)

Includes

See stock-based compensation disclosures in Note L, expense was as follows (in thousands):


 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2016   2015   2014   2013   2012 

Cost of revenues

  $1,309    $989    $614    $475    $382  

Sales and marketing

   2,412     1,978     1,933     1,481     895  

Research and development

   618     640     444     266     140  

General and administrative

   3,684     2,772     2,405     1,981     1,338  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $8,023    $6,379    $5,396    $4,203    $2,755  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Cost of revenues

 

$

2,168

 

 

$

1,887

 

 

$

1,309

 

 

$

989

 

 

$

614

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

2,675

 

 

 

2,197

 

 

 

2,412

 

 

 

1,978

 

 

 

1,933

 

Research and development

 

 

1,505

 

 

 

949

 

 

 

618

 

 

 

640

 

 

 

444

 

General and administrative

 

 

6,162

 

 

 

7,694

 

 

 

3,684

 

 

 

2,772

 

 

 

2,405

 

Total

 

$

12,510

 

 

$

12,727

 

 

$

8,023

 

 

$

6,379

 

 

$

5,396

 

(2)

For 2013, amortization of intangible assets included $290,000 for the impairment of a certainnon-competition agreement.

(3)For 2014, other expense included $338,000 for aone-time Australian stamp duty tax related to the Leadtec acquisition.

(4)

Adjusted EBITDA consists of net income plusadjusted for depreciation and amortization, interest expense, interest income, income tax expense, (benefit), stock-based compensation expense, the discrete impact from tax law change and other adjustments as necessary for a fair presentation.  In 2017, the discrete impact from tax law change included $6.8 million of tax expense related to The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”) reduction in the corporate tax rate to 21.0% resulting in a decrease in our net deferred tax assets.  Other adjustments included the impact of the fair value adjustment for the EDIAdmin earn-out liability in 2018, the fair value adjustment for the Toolbox Solutions share-basedearn-out liability in 2016, aone-time Australian stamp duty tax related to the Leadtec acquisition in 2014, as well as the impact of use tax refunds in 2015, 2014 and 20132014 related to items previously expensed.  We use Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of operating performance because it assists us in comparing performance on a consistent basis, as it removes the impact of our capital structure from our operating results.  We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to an investor in evaluating our operating performance because it is widely used to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items such as depreciation and amortization, which can vary depending upon accounting methods and the book value of assets, and to present a meaningful measure of corporate performance exclusive of our capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired.  The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2016   2015   2014   2013   2012 

Net income

  $5,710    $4,639    $2,704    $1,051    $1,222  

Depreciation and amortization

   11,336     9,572     8,570     8,051     4,918  

Interest income, net

   (601   (197   (187   (112   (19

Income tax expense

   3,140     2,436     1,408     686     121  

Other

   (1,106   (209   269     (105     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

   18,479     16,241     12,764     9,571     6,242  

Stock-based compensation expense

   8,023     6,379     5,396     4,203     2,755  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $26,502    $22,620    $18,160    $13,774    $8,997  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net income

 

$

23,872

 

 

$

351

 

 

$

4,963

 

 

$

4,639

 

 

$

2,704

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

12,686

 

 

 

11,782

 

 

 

11,336

 

 

 

9,572

 

 

 

8,570

 

Interest income, net

 

 

(2,329

)

 

 

(1,032

)

 

 

(601

)

 

 

(197

)

 

 

(187

)

Income tax expense

 

 

4,468

 

 

 

3,544

 

 

 

2,755

 

 

 

2,436

 

 

 

1,408

 

Discrete impact from tax law change

 

 

 

 

 

6,798

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

12,510

 

 

 

12,727

 

 

 

8,023

 

 

 

6,379

 

 

 

5,396

 

Other

 

 

94

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,106

)

 

 

(209

)

 

 

269

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

51,301

 

 

$

34,170

 

 

$

25,370

 

 

$

22,620

 

 

$

18,160

 

(5)

(3)

Non-GAAP income per share consists of net income plus stock-based compensation expense, and amortization expense related to intangible assets, minusthe discrete impact from tax law change and other adjustments as necessary for 2016 the impact of thea fair value adjustment for the Toolbox Solutions share-basedearn-out liabilitypresentation, divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.  Other adjustments included the impact of the fair value adjustment for the EDIAdmin earn-out liability in 2018 and the fair value adjustment for the Toolbox Solutions share-based earn-out liability in 2016.

Pursuant to a Compliance and Disclosure InterpretationsInterpretation published by the U.S. SEC in May 2016, (the “May C&DI”) related to the use ofnon-GAAP financial measures, discusses companiesin 2017, we began including an additional adjustment tonon-GAAP income to reflect the income tax effects of the adjustments to GAAP net income as discussed above. In reporting thenon-GAAP income results below, we have elected to calculatenon-GAAP income consistent with its historical practice, without(loss).  To quantify the tax adjustment discussed ineffects, we recalculate income tax expense excluding the May C&DI. We believe

that maintaining consistency with our historical practice better allows investors to evaluate our financial performance. Commencing withdirect book and tax effects of the first quarterspecific items constituting the non-GAAP adjustments.  The difference between this recalculated income tax expense and GAAP income tax expense is presented as the income tax effect of 2017, we will begin tax effectingnon-GAAP net income to conform its disclosure in accordance with the May C&DI.non-GAAP adjustments.


We believenon-GAAP income per share is useful to an investor because it is widely used to measure a company’s operating performance.  The following table provides a reconciliation of net income tonon-GAAP income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012 

Net income

 $5,710   $4,639   $2,704   $1,051   $1,222  

Stock-based compensation expense

  8,023    6,379    5,396    4,203    2,755  

Amortization of intangible assets

  4,738    3,307    2,856    3,158    1,767  

Other

  (1,106                
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP income

 $17,365   $14,325   $10,956   $8,412   $5,744  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP income per share

     

Basic

 $1.02   $0.86   $0.67   $0.55   $0.44  

Diluted

 $1.01   $0.84   $0.65   $0.53   $0.41  

Shares used to computenon-GAAP income per share

     

Basic

  16,947    16,565    16,236    15,201    13,056  

Diluted

  17,241    17,032    16,814    15,931    13,910  

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net income

 

$

23,872

 

 

$

351

 

 

$

4,963

 

 

$

4,639

 

 

$

2,704

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

12,510

 

 

 

12,727

 

 

 

8,023

 

 

 

6,379

 

 

 

5,396

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

4,093

 

 

 

4,574

 

 

 

4,738

 

 

 

3,307

 

 

 

2,856

 

Discrete impact from tax law change

 

 

 

 

 

6,798

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

94

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,106

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP income as historically reported

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

$

16,618

 

 

$

14,325

 

 

$

10,956

 

Income tax effects of adjustments

 

 

(6,594

)

 

 

(6,775

)

 

 

(4,870

)

 

 

(3,566

)

 

 

(2,891

)

Non-GAAP income with tax adjustments

 

$

33,975

 

 

$

17,675

 

 

$

11,748

 

 

$

10,759

 

 

$

8,065

 

Shares used to compute non-GAAP income per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

17,196

 

 

 

17,183

 

 

 

16,947

 

 

 

16,565

 

 

 

16,236

 

Diluted

 

 

17,606

 

 

 

17,356

 

 

 

17,241

 

 

 

17,032

 

 

 

16,814

 

Non-GAAP income per share with tax adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.98

 

 

$

1.03

 

 

$

0.69

 

 

$

0.65

 

 

$

0.50

 

Diluted

 

$

1.93

 

 

$

1.02

 

 

$

0.68

 

 

$

0.63

 

 

$

0.48

 

Non-GAAP income per share as historically reported

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

$

0.98

 

 

$

0.86

 

 

$

0.67

 

Diluted

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

$

0.96

 

 

$

0.84

 

 

$

0.65

 

(6)

(4)

This reflects the number of recurring revenue customers at the end of the period.  Recurring revenue customers are customers with monthly to annual contracts to pay usfor recurring monthly fees.services.  A small portion of our recurring revenue customers consists of separate units within a larger organization.  We treat each of these units, which may include divisions, departments, affiliates and franchises, as distinct customers.  Our contracts with our recurring revenue customers typically allow the customer to cancel the contract for any reason with 30 to 90 days’ notice.


Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the section titled “Selected Financial Data” and our audited financial statements and related notes which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form10-K.  Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements included in this discussion as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed in “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form10-K.

Overview

We areSPS Commerce is a leading provider of cloud-based supply chain management solutions providing network-proven fulfillment, sourcing, and item assortment management solutions, along with comprehensive retail performance analytics to thousands of customers worldwide. We provide our solutions through the SPS Commerce platform, a cloud-based product suite that improves the waymake it easier for retailers, suppliers, retailers,grocers, distributors and logistics firms to orchestrate the sourcing, set upmanagement of new vendorsitem data, order fulfillment, inventory control and items,sales analytics across all channels. The solutions offered by SPS Commerce eliminate the need for on-premise software and fulfillment ofsupport staff by taking on that capability on the products that customers buy from retailers and suppliers.customer’s behalf. We derive the majority of our revenues from thousands ofnumerous monthly recurring subscriptions from businesses that utilize our solutions.

We plan to continue to grow our business by further penetrating the supply chain management market, increasing revenues from our customers as their businesses grow, expanding our distribution channels, expanding our international presence and, from time to time, developing new solutions and applications.  We also intend to selectively pursue acquisitions that will add customers, allow us to expand into new regions or allow us to offer new functionalities.

For 2016, 2015the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2014,2016, we generated revenues of $193.3$248.2 million, $158.5$220.1 million and $127.9$193.2 million, respectively.  Our fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20162018 represented our 64th72nd consecutive quarter of increased revenues.  Recurring revenues from recurring revenue customers accounted for 91.6%93%, 90.8%,93% and 90.0%92% of our total revenues for 2016, 2015,the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.  Our revenues are not concentrated with any customer, as our largest customer represented 2% or less than 1% of total revenues in 2016, 2015,for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2014.2017 and less than 2% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Key Financial Terms and Metrics

Sources of Revenues

Trading Partner Community. Our Community solution provides communication programs based on our best practices.  These programs enable organizations, from large and small retailers and suppliers to emerging providers of value-added products and services, to establish trading partner relationships with new trading partners to expand their businesses.

Trading Partner Fulfillment.  Our Fulfillment solution provides fulfillment automation and replaces or augments an organization’s existing trading partner electronic communication infrastructure, enabling suppliers to have visibility into the journey of an order and comply with retailers’ rule books and enabling the electronic exchange of information among numerous trading partners through various protocols.

Trading Partner Analytics.    Our Analytics solution consists of data analytics applications that enable our customers to improve their visibility across, and analysis of, their supply chains. When focused onpoint-of-sale data, for example, retailers and suppliers can ensure inventory is located where demand is highest. Retailers improve their visibility into supplier performance and their understanding of product sell-through.

Trading Partner Assortment.  Today’s retail marketplace requires the management of tens and even hundreds ofnumerous individual attributes associated with each item a retailer or supplier sells today.  This information can include digital images/video, customer facing descriptions and measurements, and warehouse information.  Our Assortment product provides robust, extensible management of this information, enabling accurate orders and rapid fulfillment.

Trading Partner Analytics.  Our Analytics solution consists of data analytics applications that enable our customers to improve their visibility across, and analysis of, their supply chains.  When focused on point-of-sale data, for example, retailers and suppliers can ensure inventory is located where demand is highest.  Retailers improve their visibility into supplier performance and their understanding of product sell-through.

Trading Partner Sourcing.  Through Retail Universe, our social network for the retail industry, retailers can source providers of new items, suppliers can connect with new retailers and the broader retailing community can make connections to expand their business networks and grow.

Trading Partner Community Development.    Our Community Development solution provides communication programs based on our best practices. These programs enable organizations, from large and small retailers and suppliers to emerging providers of value-added products and services, to establish trading partner relationships with new trading partners to expand their businesses.

Other Trading Partner Solutions.  We provide a number of peripheral solutions such as barcode labeling, planogram services and our scan and pack application, which helps trading partners process information to streamline the picking and packaging process.


Cost of Revenues and Operating Expenses

Cost of Revenues.  Cost of revenues consist primarily of personnel costs for our customer success and implementation teams, customer support personnel and application support personnel.  Cost of revenues also includes our cost of network services, which is primarily data center costs for the locations where we keep the equipment that serves our customers and connectivity costs that facilitate electronic data transmission between our customers and their trading partners.

Sales and Marketing Expenses.  Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for our sales, marketing and product management teams, commissions earned by our sales personnel and marketing costs. In order to expand our business, we will continue to add resources to our sales and marketing efforts over time.

Research and Development Expenses.  Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for development of new and maintenance of existing solutions.solutions, net of amounts capitalized as developed software.  Our research and development group is also responsible for enhancing existing solutions and applications, as well as internal tools, and developing new information maps that integrate our customers to their trading partners in compliance with those trading partners’ requirements.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for finance, human resources and internal information technology support, as well as legal, accounting and other fees, such as credit card processing fees.

Overhead Allocation.  We allocate overhead expenses such as rent, certain employee benefit costs, office supplies and depreciation of general office assets to cost of revenues and operating expenses categories based on headcount.

Other Metrics

Recurring Revenue Customers.  As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had approximately 25,00029,000 customers with contracts to pay us monthly fees, which we refer to as recurring revenue customers.  We report recurring revenue customers atas of the end of a period.  A small portion of our recurring revenue customers consist of separate units within a larger organization.  We treat each of these units, which may include divisions, departments, affiliates and franchises, as distinct customers.

Average Recurring Revenues Per Recurring Revenue Customer.  We calculate average recurring revenues per recurring revenue customer, which we also refer to as wallet share, by dividing the recurring revenues from recurring revenue customers for the period by the average of the beginning and ending number of recurring revenue customers for the period.  For interim periods, we annualize this number by multiplying the quotient calculated above by the quotient of 12 divided by the number of months in the period.  We anticipate that average recurring revenues per recurring revenue customer will continue to increase as we increase the number of solutions we offer and increase the penetration of those solutions across our customer base.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures.  To supplement our financial statements, we also provide investors with Adjusted EBITDA andnon-GAAP income per share, both of which arenon-GAAP financial measures.  We believe that thesenon-GAAP measures provide useful information to management and investors regarding certain financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations.  Our management uses thesenon-GAAP measures to compare the company’s performance to that of prior periods for trend analyses and planning purposes.  Adjusted EBITDA is also used for purposes of determining executive and senior management incentive compensation.  These measures are also presented to our board of directors.

Thesenon-GAAP measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.GAAP. Thesenon-GAAP financial measures exclude significant expenses and income that are required by GAAP to be recorded in the company’s financial statements and are subject to inherent limitations.  Investors should review the reconciliations ofnon-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures that are included in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP.  The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures.  On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions.  We base our estimates of the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable.  Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that of our significant accounting policies, which are described in the notes to our financial statements, the following accounting policies involve a greater degree of judgment and complexity and are material to our financial statement presentation.  A critical accounting policy is one that is both material to the presentation of our financial statements and requires us to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments for uncertain matters that could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.  Accordingly, these are the policies we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

We generate revenues by providing a number of solutionsRevenues are recognized when our services are made available to our customers. These solutions include Trading Partner Fulfillment, Trading Partner Enablementcustomers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we are contractually and Trading Partner Analytics.legally entitled to in exchange for those services.  Our cloud-based solutions allow ourset-up fees from customers to meet their supply chain management requirements.

Fees related to our Trading Partner Fulfillment and Trading Partner Analytics solutions consist of two revenue sources:set-up fees and recurring monthly fees.Set-up feesare one-time revenues that are specific for each connection a customer has with a trading partner and mostmany of our customers have connections with numerous trading partners.Set-up fees related to our cloud-based supply chain management solutions are nonrefundable upfront fees that are necessary for our customers to utilize our cloud-based services.  These set-up fees do not haveprovide any standalone value to our customer and arecustomers.  

Except for our Analytics solution, we have determined that the set-up fees represent a material renewal option right to our customers as they will not separable from the recurring monthly fees. Allbe incurred again upon renewal.  These set-up fees and related costs are deferred and recognized ratably over the average life of the connection between the customer and the trading partner,two years, which is approximately two years. We begin recognizingset-up fee revenue once the connection is established.Set-up feesestimated period for which connections have not yet been established are classified as long-term. We continue to evaluate the length of the amortization period as more experiencea material right is gained with cancellations and technology changes requested bypresent for our customers. It is possible that, in the future, the period over which such subscriptionset-up fees and costs are amortized may be adjusted. Any change in

For our estimate of the average connection life will affect our future results of operations.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from our customers’ inability to pay us. The provision is based on the overall composition of our accounts receivable aging, our prior history of accounts receivable write-offs, and the type of customers and our experience with specific customers. In order to identify these customers, we perform ongoing reviews of all customers that have breached their payment terms, as well as those that have filed for bankruptcy or for whom information has become available indicating a significant risk ofnon-recoverability. In addition,Analytics solution, we have experienced significant growth indetermined that the number of our customers,set-up fees do not represent a material customer renewal right and, we have less payment history to rely upon with these customers. We rely on historical trends of bad debt as a percentage of total accounts receivablesuch, are deferred and apply these percentages torecognized ratably over the accounts receivable associated with new customers and evaluate these customers over time. To the extent that our future collections differ from our assumptions based on historical experience, the amount of our bad debt and allowance recorded may be different.estimated initial contract term, which is one year.

Income TaxesBusiness Combinations

We account for income taxes using the liability method, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is not “more likely than not” that the deferred tax asset will be utilized.

We assess our ability to realize our deferred tax assets at the end of each reporting period. Realization of our deferred tax assets is contingent upon future taxable earnings. Accordingly, this assessment requires significant estimates and judgment. If the estimates of future taxable income vary from actual results, our assessment regarding the realization of these deferred tax assets could change. Future changes in the estimated amount of deferred taxes expected to be realized will be reflected in our consolidated financial statements in the period the estimate is changed, with a corresponding adjustment to our operating results.

We recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would “more likely than not” sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the “more likely than not” threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.

We elected to early adopt Accounting Standards Update (ASU)No. 2015-17,Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,whichrequires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the classified statement of financial position. We adopted this updated accounting standard prospectively to simplify the presentation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Valuation of Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price overallocate the fair value of identifiable netpurchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, in a business combination. Assets acquired may include identifiableliabilities assumed, and intangible assets such as subscriber relationships, which are recognized separately from goodwill.

We test goodwill for impairment annually, at November 30, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.acquired based on their estimated fair values. The impairment test is conducted by comparingexcess of the fair value of the net assets with the carrying value of the reporting unit. Fair value is determined using the direct market observation of market price and outstanding equity of the reporting unit at November 30. If the carrying value were to exceedpurchase consideration over the fair valuevalues of the reporting unit, the goodwill may be impaired. If this were to occur, the fair value would then be allocated tothese identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Such valuations require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.

Significant estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, future expected cash flows from acquired users, acquired technology, and trade names from a manner similarmarket participant perspective, useful lives, and discount rates.  Significant estimates in valuing liabilities for contingent consideration include, but are not limited to, a purchase price allocation in order to determinediscount rates, projected financial results of the impliedacquired businesses based on our most recent internal forecasts, and factors indicating the probability of achieving the forecasted results.

Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the goodwill. This implied fair value would then be comparedmeasurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to the carrying amount of the goodwill and, if it were less, an impairment loss would be recognized.earnings.


During 2016, we changed our annual impairment testing date from December 31 to November 30. This voluntary change in accounting principle, applied prospectively, is preferable as it allows more timely completion of our annual impairment test and does not delay, accelerate, or avoid an impairment charge.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 20162018 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20152017

The following table presents our results of operations for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

 

  Year Ended December 31,     

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2016 2015 Change 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

Change

 

    % of revenue   % of revenue   % 

 

 

 

 

 

% of revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

 

Revenues

  $193,295    100.0 $158,518    100.0 $34,777    21.9

 

$

248,240

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

220,085

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

28,155

 

 

 

12.8

%

Cost of revenues

   64,346    33.3    50,043    31.6    14,303    28.6  

 

 

81,748

 

 

 

32.9

 

 

 

73,625

 

 

 

33.5

 

 

 

8,123

 

 

 

11.0

 

  

 

   

 

    

Gross profit

   128,949    66.7    108,475    68.4    20,474    18.9  

 

 

166,492

 

 

 

67.1

 

 

 

146,460

 

 

 

66.5

 

 

 

20,032

 

 

 

13.7

 

  

 

   

 

    

Operating expenses

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

   65,886    34.1    55,374    34.9    10,512    19.0  

 

 

71,719

 

 

 

28.9

 

 

 

71,261

 

 

 

32.4

 

 

 

458

 

 

 

0.6

 

Research and development

   21,981    11.4    17,954    11.3    4,027    22.4  

 

 

22,087

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

 

23,183

 

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

(1,096

)

 

 

(4.7

)

General and administrative

   28,827    14.9    24,817    15.7    4,010    16.2  

 

 

41,862

 

 

 

16.9

 

 

 

37,461

 

 

 

17.0

 

 

 

4,401

 

 

 

11.7

 

Amortization of intangible assets

   4,738    2.5    3,307    2.1    1,431    43.3  

 

 

4,093

 

 

 

1.6

 

 

 

4,574

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

(481

)

 

 

(10.5

)

  

 

   

 

    

Total operating expenses

   121,432    62.8    101,452    64.0    19,980    19.7  

 

 

139,761

 

 

 

56.3

 

 

 

136,479

 

 

 

62.0

 

 

 

3,282

 

 

 

2.4

 

  

 

   

 

    

Income from operations

   7,517    3.9    7,023    4.4    494    7.0  

 

 

26,731

 

 

 

10.8

 

 

 

9,981

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

16,750

 

 

 

167.8

 

Other income (expense)

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income, net

   601    0.3    197    0.1    404    205.1  

 

 

2,329

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

1,297

 

 

 

125.7

 

Other income (expense), net

   732    0.4    (145  (0.1  877    (604.8
  

 

   

 

    

Other expense, net

 

 

(720

)

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(320

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

(400

)

 

 

(125.0

)

Total other income, net

   1,333    0.7    52        1,281    2,463.5  

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

712

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

897

 

 

 

126.0

 

  

 

   

 

    

Income before income taxes

   8,850    4.6    7,075    4.5    1,775    25.1  

 

 

28,340

 

 

 

11.4

 

 

 

10,693

 

 

 

4.9

 

 

 

17,647

 

 

 

165.0

 

Income tax expense

   (3,140  (1.6  (2,436  (1.5  (704  28.9  

 

 

4,468

 

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

10,342

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

(5,874

)

 

 

(56.8

)

  

 

   

 

    

Net income

  $5,710    3.0 $4,639    2.9  1,071    23.1

 

$

23,872

 

 

 

9.6

%

 

$

351

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

$

23,521

 

 

 

6,701.1

%

  

 

   

 

    

Due to rounding, totals may not equal the sum of the line items in the table above

Revenues.  Revenues for 2016 increased $34.8 million, or 22%, to $193.3 million from $158.5 million for 2015. The increase in revenues resulted from two primary factors: the increase in recurring revenue customers, which is driven by continued business growth and by business acquisitions, and the increase in average recurring revenues per recurring revenue customer, which we also refer to as wallet share.

The number of recurring revenue customers increased 6%14% to 24,80529,308 at December 31, 20162018 from 23,41025,751 at December 31, 2015.2017.

Average recurring revenues per recurring revenue customer, or walletWallet share increased 16%4% to $7,344 for 2016$8,378 at December 31, 2018 from $6,343 for 2015.$8,067 at December 31, 2017. This increase in wallet share was primarily attributable to increased fees resulting from increased usage of our solutions by our recurring revenue customers and growth in larger customers.

Recurring revenues from recurring revenue customers increased 23%13% in 2016,2018, as compared to 2015,2017 and accounted for 92%93% of our total revenues for 20162018 and 91% for 2015.2017. We anticipate that the number of recurring revenue customers and wallet share will continue to increase as we increase the number of solutions we offer and increase the penetration of those solutions across our customer base.

Cost of Revenues. CostThe increase in cost of revenues for 2016 increased $14.3 million, or 29%, to $64.3 million from $50.0 million for 2015. This increase was primarily due to increased headcounta $6.6 million increase in 2016 which resulted in higher personnel-related costs, of approximately $10.0 million, occupancy costs of approximately $800,000driven by increased salaries and stock based compensation expense of $321,000. We also incurred higher expenses for softwarebenefits due to business growth and cloud-based subscriptions of $2.2 million andby increased contract labor. Additionally, computer depreciation expense of $627,000 forincreased $1.4 million due to continued investment in the infrastructure supporting our solutions in 2016 as compared to 2015. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues was 33% for 2016 compared to 32% for 2015. Going forward, we anticipate that cost of revenues will increase in absolute dollars as we continue to expand our business.platform.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. SalesThe slight increase in sales and marketing expenses for 2016 increased $10.5 million, or 19%, to $65.9 million from $55.4 million for 2015. This increase was primarily due to increased headcountan increase of $2.0 million from commissions offset by a net $1.8 million decrease in 2016, which resulted in higher personnel-related costs and stock-based compensation.  The increase in commissions was a result of $8.1 million and stock based compensation expense of $434,000,new business and increased commissions of approximately $2.0 million earnedreferral partnerships. The decrease in personnel-related costs was driven by sales personneldecreased headcount which was partially offset by increased salaries, benefits, and referral partners from generating new business. As a percentage of revenues, sales and marketing expenses were 34% for 2016 compared to 35% for 2015. As we expand our business, we will continue to add resources to our sales and marketing efforts over time, and we expect that these expenses will continue to increase in absolute dollars.stock-based compensation expense.

Research and Development Expenses. ResearchThe decrease in research and development expenses for 2016 increased $4.0 million, or 22%, to $22.0 million from $18.0 million for 2015. This increase was primarily due to a $4.3 million decrease in personnel-related costs related to an increase in internally developed capitalized software, driven by our continued investment in our technology.  The decrease was offset by a $3.0 million increase from other personnel-related expenses, driven by continued business growth which led to increased headcount in 2016 which resulted in higher personnel-related costs of $3.5 million. We also incurred higherand increases to expenses for softwareconsulting, salaries, benefits, and cloud-based subscriptions of $428,000 in 2016 as compared to 2015. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses were 11% for both 2016 and 2015, respectively. As we enhance and expand our solutions and applications, we expect that research and development expenses will continue to increase in absolute dollars.stock-based compensation.


General and Administrative Expenses.General  The increase in general and administrative expenses for 2016 increased $4.0 million, or 16%, to $28.8 million from $24.8 million for 2015. This increase was primarily due to increased headcountcontinued business growth which drove a $2.8 million increase in 2016 which resulted in higher personnel-related costs of $1.4(headcount, salaries and benefits) and a $2.2 million and stock based compensation expense of $911,000. We also incurred higher expenses forincrease in software subscription and maintenance of $965,000. We also had increases in our provision for doubtful accounts,subscriptions, credit card fees, and legal feesbad debt expense.  Additionally, charitable contributions increased $0.5 million and acquisition-related costs increased $0.3 million, due to the acquisitions of EDIAdmin and CovalentWorks.  These increases were offset by lower charitable contributionsa $1.5 million decrease in 2016 asstock-based compensation expenses, which normalized compared to 2015. Asthe prior year increase which was driven by a percentagemodification to our Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement resulting in immediate vesting, and expensing, of revenues, general and administrative expenses were 15% and 16% for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Going forward, we expect that general and administrative expenses will continue to increase in absolute dollars as we expand our business.his outstanding stock-based compensation awards based on his retirement eligibility.

Amortization of Intangible Assets.  AmortizationThe decrease in amortization of intangible assets for 2016 increased $1.4was driven by certain intangible assets being fully amortized in 2018, reducing the amortization expense in the current year, and was offset by a slight increase due to amortization of acquired intangible assets.

Other Income, net.  The increase in other income was primarily due to a $1.0 million from 2015. This increase wasin investment income, driven by an increase in the average amount invested throughout 2018 compared to 2017, offset by a $0.1 million decrease in income, net, due to the impact of amortization from the intangible assets acquiredfair value earn-out adjustment in the Toolbox Solutions acquisition in January 2016.

Other Income.    Other income for 2016 included $1.0 million for an adjustment of the Toolbox Solutions share-basedearn-out liability due2018 related to the fact that the contingency was resolved with no consideration paid.EDIAdmin acquisition.

Income Tax Expense.  Our 2016 and 2015 provisionprovisions for income taxes was $3.1for 2018 and 2017 were $4.5 million and $2.4$10.3 million, respectively, and included current federal, state and foreign income taxes as well as deferred federal and state income taxes.respectively. The increasedecrease in income tax expense in 2016 was primarily due to a reduction in the corporate tax rate enacted in the Tax Act, and an increase in our federal research and development credit, partially offset by the increase in pretax book incomepre-tax net income. Further, the 2017 provision included a one-time discrete tax expense of $1.8 million.

$6.8 million from the Tax Act. Finally, the discrete tax benefit from stock-based compensation was $2.5 million in 2018 as compared to $0.9 million in 2017. See Note JM to our consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form10-K, for additional information regarding our income taxes.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA, which is anon-GAAP measure of financial performance, consists of net income plusadjusted for depreciation and amortization, interest expense, interest income, income tax expense, stock-based compensation expense, the discrete impact from tax law change and other adjustments as necessary for a fair presentation.  Other adjustments

included the impact of anearn-out adjustment related to the ToolboxEDIAdmin acquisition in 2016, as well as the impact of use tax refunds in 2015 related to items previously expensed.2018.  The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):

 

  Year Ended
December  31,
 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2016   2015 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net income

  $5,710    $4,639  

 

$

23,872

 

 

$

351

 

Depreciation and amortization

   11,336     9,572  

 

 

12,686

 

 

 

11,782

 

Interest income, net

   (601   (197

 

 

(2,329

)

 

 

(1,032

)

Income tax expense

   3,140     2,436  

 

 

4,468

 

 

 

3,544

 

Discrete impact from tax law change

 

 

 

 

 

6,798

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

12,510

 

 

 

12,727

 

Other

   (1,106   (209

 

 

94

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

 

EBITDA

   18,479     16,241  

Stock-based compensation expense

   8,023     6,379  
  

 

   

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $26,502    $22,620  

 

$

51,301

 

 

$

34,170

 

  

 

   

 

 

Non-GAAP Income per Share.  Non-GAAP income per share, which is also anon-GAAP measure of financial performance, consists of net income plus stock-based compensation expense, and amortization expense related to intangible assets, less the discrete impact of the 2016from tax law change and other adjustments as necessary for a fair value adjustment for the Toolbox Solutions share-basedearn-out liability,presentation, divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.  Other adjustments included the impact of the fair value adjustment for the EDIAdmin share-based earn-out liability in 2018.

Pursuant to a Compliance and Disclosure InterpretationsInterpretation published by the SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in May 2016, (the “May C&DI”) related to the use ofnon-GAAP financial measures, discusses companiesin 2017, we began including an additional adjustment tonon-GAAP income to reflect the income tax effects of the adjustments to GAAP net income, as discussed above. In reporting thenon-GAAP income results below, we have elected to calculatenon-GAAP income consistent with its historical practice, withoutincome.  To quantify the tax adjustment discussed ineffects, we recalculated income tax expense excluding the May C&DI. We believe that maintaining consistency with our historical practice better allows investors to evaluate our financial performance. Commencing withdirect book and tax effects of the first quarterspecific items constituting the non-GAAP adjustments.  The difference between this recalculated income tax expense and GAAP income tax expense is presented as the income tax effect of 2017, we will begin tax effectingnon-GAAP net income to conform its disclosure in accordance with the May C&DI.non-GAAP adjustments.


The following table provides a reconciliation of net income tonon-GAAP income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

   Year Ended
December 31,
 
   2016   2015 

Net income

  $5,710    $4,639  

Stock-based compensation expense

   8,023     6,379  

Amortization of intangible assets

   4,738     3,307  

Other

   (1,106     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP income

  $17,365    $14,325  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP income per share

    

Basic

  $1.02    $0.86  

Diluted

  $1.01    $0.84  

Shares used to computenon-GAAP income per share

  

  

Basic

   16,947     16,565  

Diluted

   17,241     17,032  

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Net income

 

$

23,872

 

 

$

351

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

12,510

 

 

 

12,727

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

4,093

 

 

 

4,574

 

Discrete impact from tax law change

 

 

 

 

 

6,798

 

Other

 

 

94

 

 

 

 

Income tax effects of adjustments

 

 

(6,594

)

 

 

(6,775

)

Non-GAAP income

 

$

33,975

 

 

$

17,675

 

Shares used to compute non-GAAP income per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

17,196

 

 

 

17,183

 

Diluted

 

 

17,606

 

 

 

17,356

 

Non-GAAP income per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.98

 

 

$

1.03

 

Diluted

 

$

1.93

 

 

$

1.02

 

Year Ended December 31, 20152017  Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20142016

The following table presents our results of operations for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

 

  Year Ended December 31,     

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  2015 2014 Change 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

Change

 

    % of revenue   % of revenue   % 

 

 

 

 

 

% of revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

% of revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

 

Revenues

  $158,518    100.0 $127,947    100.0 $30,571    23.9

 

$

220,085

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

193,153

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

26,932

 

 

 

13.9

%

Cost of revenues

   50,043    31.6    39,991    31.3    10,052    25.1  

 

 

73,625

 

 

 

33.5

 

 

 

64,346

 

 

 

33.3

 

 

 

9,279

 

 

 

14

%

  

 

   

 

    

Gross profit

   108,475    68.4    87,956    68.7    20,519    23.3  

 

 

146,460

 

 

 

66.5

 

 

 

128,807

 

 

 

66.7

 

 

 

17,653

 

 

 

14

%

  

 

   

 

    

Operating expenses

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

   55,374    34.9    46,990    36.7    8,384    17.8  

 

 

71,261

 

 

 

32.4

 

 

 

66,876

 

 

 

34.6

 

 

 

4,385

 

 

 

7

%

Research and development

   17,954    11.3    13,494    10.5    4,460    33.1  

 

 

23,183

 

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

21,981

 

 

 

11.4

 

 

 

1,202

 

 

 

5

%

General and administrative

   24,817    15.7    20,233    15.8    4,584    22.7  

 

 

37,461

 

 

 

17.0

 

 

 

28,827

 

 

 

14.9

 

 

 

8,634

 

 

 

30

%

Amortization of intangible assets

   3,307    2.1    2,856    2.2    451    15.8  

 

 

4,574

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

4,738

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

(164

)

 

 

-3

%

  

 

   

 

    

Total operating expenses

   101,452    64.0    83,573    65.3    17,879    21.4  

 

 

136,479

 

 

 

62.0

 

 

 

122,422

 

 

 

63.4

 

 

 

14,057

 

 

 

11

%

  

 

   

 

    

Income from operations

   7,023    4.4    4,383    3.4    2,640    60.2  

 

 

9,981

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

6,385

 

 

 

3.3

 

 

 

3,596

 

 

 

56

%

Other income (expense)

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income, net

   197    0.1    187    0.1    10    5.3  

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

601

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

431

 

 

 

72

%

Other expense

   (145  (0.1  (458  (0.4  313    (68.3
  

 

   

 

    

Total other income (expense), net

   52        (271  (0.2  323    (119.2
  

 

   

 

    

Other income (expense)

 

 

(320

)

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

732

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(1,052

)

 

 

-144

%

Total other income, net

 

 

712

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

1,333

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

(621

)

 

 

-47

%

Income before income taxes

   7,075    4.5    4,112    3.2    2,963    72.1  

 

 

10,693

 

 

 

4.9

 

 

 

7,718

 

 

 

4.0

 

 

 

2,975

 

 

 

39

%

Income tax expense

   (2,436  (1.5  (1,408  (1.1  (1,028  73.0  

 

 

10,342

 

 

 

4.7

 

 

 

2,755

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

7,587

 

 

 

275

%

  

 

   

 

    

Net income

  $4,639    2.9 $2,704    2.1    1,935    71.6  

 

$

351

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

$

4,963

 

 

 

2.6

%

 

$

(4,612

)

 

 

(92.9

)%

  

 

   

 

    

 

Due to rounding, totals may not equal the sum of the line items in the table above

Revenues.  Revenues for 2015 increased $30.6 million, or 24%, to $158.5 million from $127.9 million for 2014. The increase in revenues resulted from two primary factors:  the increase in recurring revenue customers and the increase in average recurring revenues per recurring revenue customer, which we also refer to as wallet share.

The number of recurring revenue customers increased 6%4% to 23,41025,751 at December 31, 20152017 from 21,98324,805 at December 31, 2014.2016.

Average recurring revenues per recurring revenue customer, or walletWallet share increased 15%10% to $6,343$8,067 for 20152017 from $5,524$7,344 for 2014.2016.  This increase in wallet share was primarily attributable to increased fees resulting from increased usage of our solutions by our recurring revenue customers and growth in larger customers.


Recurring revenues from recurring revenue customers increased 25%15% in 2015,2017, as compared to 2014,2016, and accounted for 91%93% of our total revenues for 20152017 and 90%92% for 2014. We anticipate that the number of recurring revenue customers and wallet share will continue to increase as we increase the number of solutions we offer and increase the penetration of those solutions across our customer base.2016.  

Cost of Revenues.  CostThe increase in cost of revenues for 2015 increased $10.1 million, or 25%, to $50.0 million from $40.0 million for 2014. This increaserevenue was primarily due to increased headcount in 2015 which resulted in higher personnel-related costs of approximately $7.2$7.3 million, occupancy costs of approximately $516,000 and stock baseddriven by increased headcount. Compared to 2016, stock-based compensation expense of $375,000.increased $0.6 million and direct network costs decreased $0.2 million. We also incurred higher expensesexpense for software and cloud-based subscriptions of $988,000$0.9 million and depreciation expense of $482,000$0.7 million for continued investment in the infrastructure supporting our solutions in 2015 as compared to 2014. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues was 32% for 2015 compared to 31% for 2014.solutions.  

Sales and Marketing Expenses.  SalesThe increase in sales and marketing expenses for 2015 increased $8.4 million, or 18%, to $55.4 million from $47.0 million for 2014. This increaseexpense was primarily due to increased headcount in 2015,2017, which resulted in higher personnel-related costs of $6.2$3.0 million and occupancy costs of $409,000, and increased commissions of approximately $1.7$1.4 million earned by sales personnel and referral partners from generating new business. As a percentageWe also incurred $0.4 million in increased promotional expenses, $0.2 million in software and cloud-based subscriptions, offset by lower expense of revenues, sales$0.3 for depreciation and marketing expenses were 35% for 2015$0.2 million in stock-based compensation expense as compared to 37% for 2014.2016.

Research and Development Expenses.  ResearchThe increase in research and development expenses for 2015 increased $4.5 million, or 33%, to $18.0 million from $13.5 million for 2014. This increase was primarily due to increased headcount in 2015 which resulted in higher personnel-related costs of $3.7 million, occupancy costs of $265,000 and stock based compensation expense of $195,000. We also incurred higher expenses for software and cloud-based subscriptions of $327,000$0.7 million, higher personnel-related costs of $0.2 million and higher stock-based compensation of $0.3 million in 2015 as2017 compared to 2014. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses were 11% for both 2015 and 2014.2016.

General and Administrative Expenses.  GeneralThe increase in general and administrative expenses for 2015 increased $4.6 million, or 23%, to $24.8 million from $20.2 million for 2014. This increase was primarily due to increaseda $4.0 million increase in stock-based compensation driven by the immediate expensing of $3.6 million of equity awards due to a modification to our Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement in 2017 which resulted in immediate vesting, and expensing, of his outstanding stock-based compensation awards based on his retirement eligibility. Increased headcount in 2015 which2017 resulted in higher personnel-related costs of $2.7 million, occupancy costs of $423,000 and stock based compensation expense of $368,000. We also incurred higher expenses for software subscription and maintenance of $286,000. We also had$3.3 million. These increases in our provision for doubtful accounts, credit card fees and charitable contributionswere offset by lower legal feescharitable contributions, hardware not capitalized, and hardware maintenance costs in 20152017 as compared to 2014. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses were 16% for both 2015 and 2014.2016.

Amortization of Intangible Assets.  AmortizationThe decrease in amortization of intangible assets for 2015 increased $451,000 from 2014. This increase was due to the impact of a full year of amortization from thecertain intangible assets acquired in the Leadtec acquisition in October 2014.becoming fully amortized during 2017.

Other Expense.Income (Expense), net.  Other expenseincome (expense), net for 20142016 included $338,000 for aone-time Australian stamp duty tax related $1.0 million adjustment to the Leadtec acquisitionfair value of the Toolbox Solutions share-based earn-out liability due to a change in October 2014.our estimate of probability of attainment. There was no similar charge during 2017 as the contingent consideration arrangement had been resolved.

Income Tax Expense.  Our 2015 and 2014 provisionprovisions for income taxes was $2.4for 2017 and 2016 were $10.3 million and $1.4$2.8 million, respectively, andrespectively. The provision in 2017 included current federal, state and foreign income taxes as well as deferred federal and state income taxes. The increase$6.8 million in income tax expense primarily driven by the reduction in 2015 was primarily duethe corporate income tax rate to 21% offset by $0.9 million of discrete tax benefits from the increase in pretax book incomeadoption of $3.0 million.

ASU 2016-09 relating to stock-based compensation. See Note JM to our consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form10-K, for additional information regarding our income taxes.

Adjusted EBITDA.  Adjusted EBITDA, which is anon-GAAP measure of financial performance, consists of net income plus depreciation and amortization, interest expense, interest income, income tax expense, stock-based compensation expense and other adjustments as necessary for a fair presentation.  Other adjustments included the impact of aone-time Australian stamp duty taxan earn-out adjustment related to the LeadtecToolbox acquisition in 2014, as well as the impact of use tax refunds in 2015 and 2014 related to items previously expensed.2016.  The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):

 

  Year Ended
December 31,
 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2015 2014 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net income

  $4,639   $2,704  

 

$

351

 

 

$

4,963

 

Depreciation and amortization

   9,572    8,570  

 

 

11,782

 

 

 

11,336

 

Interest income, net

   (197  (187

 

 

(1,032

)

 

 

(601

)

Income tax expense

   2,436    1,408  

 

 

10,342

 

 

 

2,755

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

12,727

 

 

 

8,023

 

Other

   (209  269  

 

 

 

 

 

(1,106

)

  

 

  

 

 

EBITDA

   16,241    12,764  

Stock-based compensation expense

   6,379    5,396  
  

 

  

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $22,620   $18,160  

 

$

34,170

 

 

$

25,370

 

  

 

  

 

 

Non-GAAP Income per Share.  Non-GAAP income per share, which is also anon-GAAP measure of financial performance, consists of net income plus stock-based compensation expense and amortization expense related to intangible assets, the discrete impact from tax law change and other adjustments necessary for a fair presentation, divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Other adjustments included the impact of the fair value adjustment for the Toolbox Solutions share-based earn-out liability in 2016.

Pursuant to a Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation published by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in May 2016, related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures, in 2017, we began including an adjustment to non-GAAP income to reflect the income tax effects of the adjustments to GAAP net income.  To quantify the tax effects, we recalculated income tax expense excluding the direct book and tax effects of the specific items constituting the non-GAAP adjustments.  The difference between this recalculated income tax expense and GAAP income tax expense is presented as the income tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income tonon-GAAP income per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  Year Ended
December 31,
 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2015   2014 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Net income

  $4,639    $2,704  

 

$

351

 

 

$

4,963

 

Stock-based compensation expense

   6,379     5,396  

 

 

12,727

 

 

 

8,023

 

Amortization of intangible assets

   3,307     2,856  

 

 

4,574

 

 

 

4,738

 

  

 

   

 

 

Non-GAAP income

  $14,325    $10,956  
  

 

   

 

 

Non-GAAP income per share

    

Basic

  $0.86    $0.67  

Diluted

  $0.84    $0.65  

Discrete impact from tax law change

 

 

6,798

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

(1,106

)

Non-GAAP income as historically reported

 

N/A

 

 

$

16,618

 

Income tax effects of adjustments

 

 

(6,775

)

 

 

(4,870

)

Non-GAAP income with tax adjustments

 

$

17,675

 

 

$

11,748

 

Shares used to computenon-GAAP income per share

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

   16,565     16,236  

 

 

17,183

 

 

 

16,947

 

Diluted

   17,032     16,814  

 

 

17,356

 

 

 

17,241

 

Non-GAAP income per share with tax adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.03

 

 

$

0.69

 

Diluted

 

$

1.02

 

 

$

0.68

 

Non-GAAP income per share as historically reported

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

N/A

 

 

$

0.98

 

Diluted

 

N/A

 

 

$

0.96

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2016,2018, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit and marketable securities totaling $146.4$178.4 million and accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, of $20.7$27.5 million compared to cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities totaling $144.0$168.5 million and accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, of $17.6$24.9 million at December 31, 2015. Marketable2017. Certificates of deposit and marketable securities are invested in accordance with our investment policy, with a goal of maintaining liquidity and capital preservation.  Our cash equivalents and marketable securities are held in highly liquid money market funds, commercial paper, federal agency securities and corporate debt securities.

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash flows from operating activities was $55.0 million in 2018, compared to $31.1 million in 2017, an increase of $23.9 million. This is primarily driven by a $23.5 million increase in net income, with the remaining net increase of $0.4 million relating to increases due to continued business growth offset by a decrease to deferred income taxes.


Net cash provided by operating activities was $31.1 million for 2017 compared to $18.8 million for 2016 compared to $14.4 million for 2015.2016.  The increase in operating cash flows as compared to 20152016 was driven by a $1.1$19.1 million increase in net income,non-cash expenses and a $0.8$1.3 million increase innon-cash expenses changes in assets and a $2.5 million increaseliabilities, primarily due to increases in deferred revenues, accrued expenses and accounts payable, partially offset by increases in deferred costs and deferred rent as compared to 2015.rent.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $14.4 million for 2015 compared to $16.8 million for 2014. The decrease in operating cash flows as compared to 2014 was driven by the decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses due to the timing of payments and the Leadtec acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2014 along with the decrease in other current andnon-current assets also due to the timing of payments, which was somewhat offset by higher net income and the increase innon-cash expenses.

Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $34.1$40.5 million for 20162018 compared to $31.3$22.6 million for 2015.2017.  The increase in cashwas primarily due to $27.3 million used in investing activities as compared to 2015 wasfor acquisitions of business and intangible assets, driven by the $18.0 million acquisitionacquisitions of Toolbox Solutions, net of cash acquired, partially offset by $15.0 million provided by maturities of marketable securities. There was no significant change in the amount of cash used for purchases of marketable securities orEDIAdmin and CovalentWorks. Additionally, capital expenditures in 2016 comparedincreased by $6.4 million, due to 2015. In general, our capital expenditures are for supporting our business growth and existing customer base, as well as forcontinued investment in our internal use such as equipment for our employees.technology.  These increases were offset by a $15.3 million decrease in cash used compared to 2017, driven by minimal change in investments in 2018 compared to significant increases in investments in 2017.

Net cash used in investing activities was $31.3$22.6 million for 20152017 compared to $20.2$34.1 million for 2014.2016.  The decrease in cash used was due to the 2016 acquisition of Toolbox Solutions for $18.0 million, partially offset by a $6.8 million increase in cash used for investments in investing activities as compared to 2014 was driven by $22.5 million in purchases of marketable securities and a $1.1 million increase in capital expenditures, partially offset by the fact that there were no business acquired in 2015, while Leadtec was acquired for $12.5 million in 2014.2017.

Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for 2018 was $3.8 million compared to $2.5 million in 2017, a $1.3 million increase. This increase is due to a $14 million increase in cash used for repurchases of common stock and offset by a $12.9 million increase in cash provided by proceeds from the exercise of options to purchase common stock, driven by the significant increase in the company’s stock price which increased option exercises.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $10.1$2.5 million $8.3for 2017, which consisted of $5.8 million of repurchases of our common stock, partially offset by $1.4 million and $3.5$1.9 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, all related toof proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the net proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan.

Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Changes

Our results of operations and cash flows were not materially affected by fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates.  We maintained approximately 6% of our total cash and cash equivalents outside of the U.S. in foreign currencies, primarily in Australian and Canadian dollars.  We believe that a significant change in foreign currency exchange rates or an inability to access these funds would not affect our ability to meet our operational needs.

Adequacy of Capital Resources

Our future capital requirements may vary significantly from those now planned and will depend on many factors, including:

costs to develop and implement new solutions and applications, if any;

sales and marketing resources needed to further penetrate our market and gain acceptance of new solutions and applications that we may develop;

expansion of our operations in the United StatesU.S. and internationally;

response of competitors to our solutions and applications; and

use of capital for acquisitions, if any.

Historically, we have experienced increases in our expenditures consistent with the growth in our operations and personnel, and we anticipate that our expenditures will continue to increase as we expand our business.

We believe our cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and cash flows from our operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months.

During the last three years, inflation and changing prices have not had a material effect on our business and we do not expect that inflation or changing prices will materially affect our business in the foreseeable future.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have anyoff-balance sheet arrangements, investments in special purpose entities or undisclosed borrowings or debt.  Additionally, we are not a party to any derivative contracts or synthetic leases.

Contractual and Commercial Commitment Summary

Our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 20162018 are summarized below:

 

 

Payments Due By Period (in thousands)

 

  Payments Due By Period (in thousands) 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More Than

 

Contractual Obligations

  Total   Less Than
1 Year
   1-3 Years   3-5 Years   More Than
5 Years
 

 

Total

 

 

1 Year

 

 

1-3 Years

 

 

3-5 Years

 

 

5 Years

 

Operating lease obligations

  $13,707    $3,318    $6,343    $2,872    $1,174  

 

$

24,878

 

 

$

4,209

 

 

$

7,956

 

 

$

7,896

 

 

$

4,817

 

Seasonality

The size and breadth of our customer base mitigates the seasonality of any particular retailer. As a result, our results of operations are not materially affected by seasonality.

RecentRecently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)ASU No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)and Other Assets and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers (Subtopic 340-40), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  This guidance will replacereplaced most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective.GAAP. Topic 606 also includes Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers, which requires the deferral of incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer. Collectively, we refer to Topic 606 and Subtopic 340-40 as the “new standard”. These new requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods.

We do not believeadopted the new revenue recognition standard will materiallyeffective January 1, 2018, on a retrospective basis.  The new standard did not impact our recognition of the primary feesrecurring revenue received from customers for our cloud-based supply chain solutions. We believesolutions; however, the adoption of the new standard could impactimpacted our accounting for certain upfrontset-up fees, and the periods over which the related revenues are recognized as well asand the timing of costrevenue recognition for sales commissions and other contract acquisition costs. We are currently evaluating implementation methods and the extentthese set-up fees.  The adoption of the impact that implementationnew standard also impacted our accounting for certain costs to obtain our contracts, specifically related to the periods over which commissions are recognized.  Additional information regarding the adoption of this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.is contained in Note A and Note C.

In November 2015,January 2018, we adopted FASB ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the FASB issued ASUNo. 2015-17,Balance Sheet ClassificationDefinition of Deferred Taxesa Business, which amendsclarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance requiring companies to separate deferredassist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as business acquisitions or as an asset acquisition.  The new standard specifies the required inputs and processes that are necessary to be a business. The adoption of this standard impacted our accounting for business combinations.  See Note B for additional information regarding business combinations.

In March 2018, we adopted FASB ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which updates the income tax liabilitiesaccounting in U.S. GAAP to reflect the SEC interpretive guidance released on December 22, 2017, when the Tax Act was signed into law. Additional information regarding the adoption of this standard is contained in Note M.

In October 2018, we early adopted FASB ASU 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and assets into current andnon-current amountsOther – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a classified statement of financial position. This accounting guidance simplifiesCloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which aligns the presentation of deferred income taxes, such that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified asnon-currentrequirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a classified statement of financial position. This accounting guidancehosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The standard is effective for usinterim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and can be applied either prospectively to implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption or retrospectively to all arrangements, with early adoption permitted. Additional information regarding the adoption of this standard is contained in the first quarter of 2017, but we elected to early adopt this guidance prospectively as of December 31, 2015. As a result, we have classified all deferred tax liabilities and assets asnon-current in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.Note I.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02,Leases, which will supersede the existing lease guidance and will require all leases with a term greater than 12 months to be recognized in the statements of financial position and eliminate current real estate-specific lease guidance, while maintaining substantially similar classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted.


We believe the adoption ofadopted the new lease accountingstandard on January 1, 2019 and used the effective date as our date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will materially impactnot be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019.

The new standard provides several optional practical expedients in transition. For the fiscal period beginning January 1, 2019, we have made the following elections.  We elected the “package of practical expedients,” which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our

prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We did not elect the use-of hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements; the latter not being applicable to us.  The new standard also provided practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify, which means we have not recognized right-of-use (“ROU”) assets or lease liabilities for these leases, and this included not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. We also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all leases.

consolidatedThis standard has a material effect on our financial statements by increasing ournon-currentbeginning January 1, 2019. The most significant effects relate to the recognition of approximately $15.0 million in ROU assets andnon-current $15.0 million additional lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets in order to record the right of use assets and related lease liabilitiessheet for our existing operating leases.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendment in this update replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses on instruments within its scope, including trade receivables. This update is intended to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses. This ASU is effective for annual periods and interim periods for those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Entities may early adopt beginning after December 15, 2018. We are incurrently evaluating the processimpact of determining the financial statement impact and are currently unable to estimate the impactadoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016,February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, 2016-09,Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)Improvements, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which permits entities to make an accounting policy election related to how forfeitures will impactretained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the recognition of compensation cost for stock-based compensation,Tax Act and also eliminates the requirement that excessrequires certain disclosures regarding stranded tax benefits be realized as a reductioneffects in current taxes payable before the associated tax benefit can be recognized as an increase in paid in capital.accumulated other comprehensive income.  This standardguidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016,2018, with early adoption permitted.permitted during interim or annual periods.  We expect that our previously unrecognized federal and state net operating losses ($46.2 million and $10.7 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2016) will be included in the deferred tax assets recognized in our consolidated balance sheets on a modified retrospective basis as of January 1, 2017. Withbelieve the adoption of ASU2016-09 wethis standard will also be required to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity in the same manner as other cash flows related to income taxesnot have a material impact on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity.our consolidated financial statements.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Sensitivity Risk.  The principal objectives of our investment activities are to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income consistent with minimizing risk of material loss.  We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates.  However, based on the nature and current level of our investments (primarily cash and cash equivalents, which approximate fair value due to their short maturities, certificates of deposit and marketable securities), we believe there is no material risk exposure.  We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes.

We did not have any outstanding debt as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015.2017.  We therefore do not have any material risk to interest rate fluctuations.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk.  We have revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Australian dollar and Canadian dollar.  As of December 31, 2016,2018, we maintained approximately 10%6% of our total cash and cash equivalents outside of the United StatesU.S. in foreign currencies, primarily in Australian and Canadian dollars.  We believe that a significant change in foreign currency exchange rates or an inability to access these funds would not affect our ability to meet our operational needs.  As we expand internationally, our results of operations and cash flows may be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and would be adversely impacted when the U.S. dollar appreciates relative to other foreign currencies.  We have not used any forward contracts or currency borrowings to hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk, although we may do so in the future.



Item 8.

Financial StatementsStatements and Supplementary Data

SPS Commerce, Inc. Consolidated Financial Statements


Report of IndependentIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TheTo the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders


SPS Commerce, Inc.:

Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SPS Commerce, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015, and2017, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016.2018, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited SPS Commerce, Inc.’sthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  SPS Commerce, Inc.’s

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note A to the financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for revenue on January 1, 2018 due to the full retrospective adoption of FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Topic 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of SPS Commerce, Inc. and subsidiaries asacquired the net assets of December 31, 2016 and 2015,EDIAdmin and the resultsnet assets of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ending December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, SPS Commerce, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission .

SPS Commerce Canada, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of SPS Commerce, Inc., acquired all outstanding common shares of Toolbox Solutions, Inc. (“Toolbox”)CovalentWorks during the firstfourth quarter of 2016,2018, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of

December 31, 2016, Toolbox’s2018, EDIAdmin’s and CovalentWorks’ internal control over financial reporting associated with approximately two and six percent of total assets, of approximately fourrespectively, and each represents less than one percent of SPS Commerce, Inc.’s total assets and four percent of revenues, in the consolidated financial statements of SPS Commerce, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of SPS Commerce, Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Toolbox.EDIAdmin and CovalentWorks.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

Minneapolis, Minnesota


February 27, 201722, 2019


SPS COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share amounts)shares)

 

  December 31, 

 

December 31,

 

  2016 2015 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

ASSETS

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $115,877   $121,538  

 

$

133,859

 

 

$

123,127

 

Short-term marketable securities

   23,076    7,517  

Short-term investments

 

 

44,537

 

 

 

40,192

 

Accounts receivable, net

   20,746    17,615  

 

 

27,488

 

 

 

24,897

 

Deferred costs

   19,224    15,086  

 

 

34,502

 

 

 

29,966

 

Other current assets

   7,010    5,030  

 

 

9,229

 

 

 

6,149

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current assets

   185,933    166,786  

 

 

249,615

 

 

 

224,331

 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net

   15,314    13,620  

 

 

20,957

 

 

 

16,856

 

GOODWILL

   49,777    33,848  

 

 

69,658

 

 

 

51,613

 

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net

   19,788    15,081  

 

 

22,741

 

 

 

16,529

 

MARKETABLE SECURITIES,non-current

   7,494    14,950  

INVESTMENTS

 

 

 

 

 

5,206

 

OTHER ASSETS

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred costs,non-current

   6,086    5,260  

Deferred income taxes,non-current

   12,446    11,149  

Othernon-current assets

   1,527    1,037  
  

 

  

 

 

Deferred costs

 

 

10,973

 

 

 

9,967

 

Deferred income tax asset

 

 

10,456

 

 

 

13,697

 

Other assets

 

 

1,723

 

 

 

1,539

 

Total assets

  $298,365   $261,731  

 

$

386,123

 

 

$

339,738

 

  

 

  

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

  $2,302   $2,163  

 

$

4,440

 

 

$

4,463

 

Accrued compensation

   13,740    11,150  

 

 

20,415

 

 

 

15,228

 

Accrued expenses

   3,508    1,987  

 

 

4,558

 

 

 

4,712

 

Deferred revenue

   11,055    7,740  

 

 

25,328

 

 

 

17,863

 

Deferred rent

   1,556    1,194  

 

 

1,781

 

 

 

1,679

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total current liabilities

   32,161    24,234  

 

 

56,522

 

 

 

43,945

 

OTHER LIABILITIES

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred revenue,non-current

   10,847    11,005  

Deferred rent,non-current

   4,179    4,307  

Deferred revenue

 

 

2,512

 

 

 

2,731

 

Deferred rent

 

 

5,371

 

 

 

3,064

 

Deferred income tax liability

   1,911      

 

 

1,376

 

 

 

1,887

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other non-current liabilities

 

 

1,368

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   49,098    39,546  

 

 

67,149

 

 

 

51,627

 

  

 

  

 

 

COMMITMENTS and CONTINGENCIES

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 55,000,000 shares authorized; 17,081,145 and 16,723,994 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

   17    17  

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 55,000,000 shares authorized; 17,757,628 and 17,249,153 shares issued; and 17,345,736 and 17,127,006 outstanding, respectively

 

 

18

 

 

 

17

 

Treasury stock, at cost; 411,892 and 122,147 shares, respectively

 

 

(25,679

)

 

 

(5,815

)

Additionalpaid-in capital

   286,315    265,265  

 

 

332,592

 

 

 

301,863

 

Accumulated deficit

   (33,739  (39,449

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (3,326  (3,648
  

 

  

 

 

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

 

 

15,261

 

 

 

(8,611

)

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(3,218

)

 

 

657

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   249,267    222,185  

 

 

318,974

 

 

 

288,111

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $298,365   $261,731  

 

$

386,123

 

 

$

339,738

 

  

 

  

 

 

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.


SPS COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2016 2015 2014 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Revenues

  $193,295   $158,518   $127,947  

 

$

248,240

 

 

$

220,085

 

 

$

193,153

 

Cost of revenues

   64,346    50,043    39,991  

 

 

81,748

 

 

 

73,625

 

 

 

64,346

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross profit

   128,949    108,475    87,956  

 

 

166,492

 

 

 

146,460

 

 

 

128,807

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Operating expenses

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

   65,886    55,374    46,990  

 

 

71,719

 

 

 

71,261

 

 

 

66,876

 

Research and development

   21,981    17,954    13,494  

 

 

22,087

 

 

 

23,183

 

 

 

21,981

 

General and administrative

   28,827    24,817    20,233  

 

 

41,862

 

 

 

37,461

 

 

 

28,827

 

Amortization of intangible assets

   4,738    3,307    2,856  

 

 

4,093

 

 

 

4,574

 

 

 

4,738

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total operating expenses

   121,432    101,452    83,573  

 

 

139,761

 

 

 

136,479

 

 

 

122,422

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

   7,517    7,023    4,383  

 

 

26,731

 

 

 

9,981

 

 

 

6,385

 

Other income (expense)

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income, net

   601    197    187  

 

 

2,329

 

 

 

1,032

 

 

 

601

 

Other income (expense), net

   732    (145  (458

 

 

(720

)

 

 

(320

)

 

 

732

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other income (expense), net

   1,333    52    (271
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other income, net

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

712

 

 

 

1,333

 

Income before income taxes

   8,850    7,075    4,112  

 

 

28,340

 

 

 

10,693

 

 

 

7,718

 

Income tax expense

   (3,140  (2,436  (1,408

 

 

4,468

 

 

 

10,342

 

 

 

2,755

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

  $5,710   $4,639   $2,704  

 

$

23,872

 

 

$

351

 

 

$

4,963

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income per share

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

  $0.34   $0.28   $0.17  

 

$

1.39

 

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.29

 

Diluted

  $0.33   $0.27   $0.16  

 

$

1.36

 

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.29

 

Weighted average common shares used to compute net income per share

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

   16,947    16,565    16,236  

 

 

17,196

 

 

 

17,183

 

 

 

16,947

 

Diluted

   17,241    17,032    16,814  

 

 

17,606

 

 

 

17,356

 

 

 

17,241

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

    

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   336    (2,119  (1,470

 

 

(3,999

)

 

 

3,944

 

 

 

336

 

Unrealized loss on investments (net of tax of $5, $31, and $0)

   (9  (59    
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax of $132, $0 and ($5)

 

 

397

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(9

)

Reclassification of unrealized (gain) loss on investments into earnings, net of tax of ($91), $24 and $0

 

 

(273

)

 

 

39

 

 

 

-

 

Comprehensive income

  $6,037   $2,461   $1,234  

 

$

19,997

 

 

$

4,334

 

 

$

5,290

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.


SPS COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In thousands, except share amounts)shares)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

Common Stock

   Additional
Paid-in
Capital
   Accumulated
Deficit
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

Earnings

 

 

Other

 

 

Total

 

   

 

Common Stock

 

 

Treasury Stock

 

 

Paid-in

 

 

(Accumulated

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Stockholders'

 

   
  Shares   Amount    

Balances, January 1, 2014

   16,092,121    $16    $239,549    $(46,792 $   $192,773  

Stock-based compensation

             5,396             5,396  

Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock

   186,678          1,886             1,886  

Excess tax benefit of stock options exercised

             261             261  

Employee stock purchase plan

   26,353          1,338             1,338  

Stock issued for acquisition

   43,595       2,203       2,203  

Net income

                  2,704        2,704  

Foreign currency translation adjustments

                      (1,470  (1,470
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balances, December 31, 2014

   16,348,747     16     250,633     (44,088  (1,470  205,091  

Stock-based compensation

             6,379             6,379  

Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock

   346,885     1     4,439             4,440  

Excess tax benefit of stock options exercised

             2,336             2,336  

Employee stock purchase plan

   28,362          1,478             1,478  

Net income

                  4,639        4,639  

Foreign currency translation adjustments

                      (2,119  (2,119

Unrealized loss on investments

                      (59  (59
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Deficit)

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

Equity

 

Balances, December 31, 2015

   16,723,994     17     265,265     (39,449  (3,648  222,185  

 

 

16,723,994

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

265,265

 

 

 

(30,202

)

 

 

(3,648

)

 

 

231,432

 

Stock-based compensation

             8,023             8,023  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,023

 

Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock

   279,841          4,303             4,303  

 

 

279,841

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,303

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,303

 

Excess tax benefit of stock options exercised

             4,070             4,070  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,070

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,070

 

Employee stock purchase plan

   33,357          1,732             1,732  

 

 

33,357

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,732

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,732

 

Stock issued for acquisition

   43,953          2,922             2,922  

 

 

43,953

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,922

 

Net income

                  5,710        5,710  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,963

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

                      336    336  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

336

 

 

 

336

 

Reclassification of losses on investments into earnings

                      18    18  

Reclassification of loss on investments into earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

18

 

Unrealized loss on investments

                      (32  (32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

(32

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balances, December 31, 2016

   17,081,145    $17    $286,315    $(33,739 $(3,326 $249,267  

 

 

17,081,145

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

286,315

 

 

 

(25,239

)

 

 

(3,326

)

 

 

257,767

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,728

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,728

 

Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock

 

 

135,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,410

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,410

 

Cumulative-effect adjustment for previously unrecognized excess tax benefits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,277

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,277

 

Employee stock purchase plan

 

 

40,968

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,933

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,933

 

Retirement of escrow shares

 

 

(8,866

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(523

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(523

)

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

(122,147

)

 

 

 

 

 

122,147

 

 

 

(5,815

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,815

)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

351

 

 

 

 

 

 

351

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,944

 

 

 

3,944

 

Reclassification of loss on investments into earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39

 

 

 

39

 

Balances, December 31, 2017

 

 

17,127,006

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

122,147

 

 

 

(5,815

)

 

 

301,863

 

 

 

(8,611

)

 

 

657

 

 

 

288,111

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,270

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,270

 

Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock

 

 

433,199

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,343

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,344

 

Employee stock purchase plan

 

 

34,798

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,745

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,745

 

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

(289,745

)

 

 

 

 

 

289,745

 

 

 

(19,864

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19,864

)

Stock issued for acquisition

 

 

40,478

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,371

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,371

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,872

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,872

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,999

)

 

 

(3,999

)

Reclassification of gain on investments into earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(273

)

 

 

(273

)

Unrealized gain on investments, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

397

 

 

 

397

 

Balances, December 31, 2018

 

 

17,345,736

 

 

$

18

 

 

 

411,892

 

 

$

(25,679

)

 

$

332,592

 

 

$

15,261

 

 

$

(3,218

)

 

$

318,974

 

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.


SPS COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2016 2015 2014 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Cash flows from operating activities

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

  $5,710  $4,639  $2,704 

 

$

23,872

 

 

$

351

 

 

$

4,963

 

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

   (1,698  (38  1,031 

 

 

2,798

 

 

 

9,616

 

 

 

(2,083

)

Share-basedearn-out liability

   (1,103      

Earn-out liability

 

 

94

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,103

)

Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment

   6,598   6,265   5,714 

 

 

8,593

 

 

 

7,208

 

 

 

6,598

 

Amortization of intangible assets

   4,738   3,307   2,856 

 

 

4,093

 

 

 

4,574

 

 

 

4,738

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

   1,375   1,271   717 

 

 

2,592

 

 

 

1,705

 

 

 

1,375

 

Stock-based compensation

   8,023   6,379   5,396 

 

 

12,510

 

 

 

12,728

 

 

 

8,023

 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions

    

Other, net

 

 

(364

)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of

acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

   (3,735  (3,517  (3,890

 

 

(4,569

)

 

 

(5,586

)

 

 

(3,735

)

Deferred costs

   (4,964  (3,023  (4,590

 

 

(5,564

)

 

 

(7,813

)

 

 

(4,085

)

Other current assets andnon-current assets

   (1,911  (2,037  (719

Other current and non-current assets

 

 

(3,333

)

 

 

393

 

 

 

(1,911

)

Accounts payable

   (382  (1,569  1,271 

 

 

937

 

 

 

832

 

 

 

(382

)

Accrued compensation

   2,180   1,295   1,568 

 

 

3,957

 

 

 

1,304

 

 

 

2,291

 

Accrued expenses

   990   (461  1,365 

 

 

(135

)

 

 

1,192

 

 

 

990

 

Deferred revenue

   2,710   587   2,440 

 

 

7,094

 

 

 

5,588

 

 

 

2,852

 

Deferred rent

   234   1,331   925 

 

 

2,440

 

 

 

(1,027

)

 

 

234

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   18,765   14,429   16,788 

 

 

55,015

 

 

 

31,050

 

 

 

18,765

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

   (8,008  (8,757  (7,582

 

 

(13,750

)

 

 

(7,271

)

 

 

(8,008

)

Purchases of marketable securities

   (23,135  (22,527   

Maturities of marketable securities

   15,018       

Business acquistions, net of cash acquired

   (18,032     (12,595
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Purchases of investments

 

 

(81,666

)

 

 

(47,878

)

 

 

(23,135

)

Maturities of investments

 

 

82,224

 

 

 

33,029

 

 

 

15,018

 

Acquisition of business and intangible assets, net of cash acquired

 

 

(27,273

)

 

 

(500

)

 

 

(18,032

)

Net cash used in investing activities

   (34,157  (31,284  (20,177

 

 

(40,465

)

 

 

(22,620

)

 

 

(34,157

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

(19,864

)

 

 

(5,815

)

 

 

 

Net proceeds from exercise of options to purchase common stock

   4,303   4,440   1,886 

 

 

14,344

 

 

 

1,410

 

 

 

4,303

 

Excess tax benefit from exercise of options to purchase common stock

   4,070   2,336   261 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,070

 

Net proceeds from employee stock purchase plan

   1,732   1,478   1,338 

 

 

1,745

 

 

 

1,933

 

 

 

1,732

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

   10,105   8,254   3,485 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(3,775

)

 

 

(2,472

)

 

 

10,105

 

Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (374  (656  (595

 

 

(43

)

 

 

1,292

 

 

 

(374

)

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (5,661  (9,257  (499

 

 

10,732

 

 

 

7,250

 

 

 

(5,661

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   121,538   130,795   131,294 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $115,877  $121,538  $130,795 
  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

 

123,127

 

 

 

115,877

 

 

 

121,538

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

133,859

 

 

$

123,127

 

 

$

115,877

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes, net

  $722  $114  $113 

 

$

1,534

 

 

$

1,068

 

 

$

722

 

Non-cash financing activities:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net purchases of property and equipment on account

 

$

405

 

 

$

1,335

 

 

$

 

Common stock issued for business acquisitions

  $2,922  $  $2,203 

 

$

3,371

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,922

 

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.


SPS COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE A – General

Business Description

We areSPS Commerce is a leading provider of cloud-based supply chain management solutions providing network-proven fulfillment, sourcing and item assortment management solutions, along with comprehensive retail performance analytics, to thousands of customers worldwide. We provide our solutions through the SPS Commerce platform, a cloud-based product suite that improves the waymake it easier for retailers, suppliers, retailers, distributors, and logistics firms to orchestrate the sourcing, set upmanagement of new vendorsitem data, order fulfillment, inventory control and items,sales analytics across all channels. Implementing and fulfillmentmaintaining a suite of supply chain management capabilities is resource intensive and is not a core competency for most businesses. The solutions offered by SPS commerce eliminate the productsneed for on-premise software and support staff by taking on that capability on the customer’s behalf. The solutions SPS Commerce provides allow our customers buy from retailersto increase their supply cycle agility, optimize their inventory levels and suppliers. We derive the majority of our revenues from thousands of monthly recurring subscriptions from businessessell-through, reduce operational costs and gain increased visibility into customer orders, ensuring that utilize our solutions.suppliers, distributors, and logistics firms can satisfy exacting retailer requirements.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of SPS Commerce, Inc. and its subsidiaries.  All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, with the resulting translation adjustments recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.  Income and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates during the year.  Foreign currency transaction gains and losses, if any, are included in net income.

Use of Estimates

Preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Business Combinations

We recognize separately from goodwill the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the acquisition date.date, separately from goodwill.  Goodwill as of the acquisition date is measured as the excess of consideration transferred and the net of the acquisition date amounts of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed.  

Assets acquired include tangible and intangible assets.  We use estimates and assumptions that we believe are reasonable as a part of determiningthe purchase price allocation, which includes the process to determine the value and useful lives of purchased intangible assets and the purchase price allocation process. process to determine the value of any contingent consideration liabilities.  We recorded the acquisition-date fair value of any contingent liabilities, such as earn-out provisions, as part of the consideration transferred. The earn-out liability fair value is subsequently remeasured at each reporting date. The Company evaluates each contingent consideration to determine the valuation approach.  See Note B for valuation methods utilized in the fair value measurement as of the acquisition date and see Note E for valuation methods utilized in the fair value remeasurement as of the reporting date.


While we believe these estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement.  As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed.assumed.  Any such adjustments would be recorded as an offset to goodwill.  Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the fair values, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments would be recorded in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Segment Information

We operate in and report on one segment, which is supply chain management solutions.

Risk and Uncertainties

We rely on hardware and software licensed from third parties to offer ouron-demand solutions.  Our management believes alternate sources are available; however, disruption or termination of these relationships could adversely affect our operating results in the near term.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of temporary cash and cash equivalents in financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits and trade accounts receivable.  Temporary cashCash investments are held with financial institutions that we believe are subject to minimal risk.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments with original maturities of less than 90 days.  Cash and cash equivalents are stated at fair value.

Marketable SecuritiesInvestments

Management determines the appropriate classification of certificates of deposit and marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such determination at each balance sheet date.  Securities are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a separate component on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.  Fair value is determined based on quoted market rates when observable or utilizing data points that are observable, such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves.  When a determination has been made that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value has occurred, the amount of the decline that is related to a credit loss is realized and is included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, which include cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued expenses, approximates fair value due to their short maturities.  Marketable securities are recorded at fair value as further described in Note C.E.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are initially recorded upon the sale of solutions to customers.  Credit is granted in the normal course of business without collateral.  Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for doubtful accounts, which represent estimated losses resulting from the inability of certain customers to make the required payments.  When determining the allowances for doubtful accounts, we take several factors into consideration including the overall composition of the accounts receivable aging, our prior history of accounts receivable write-offs, the type of customers and our experience with specific customers.  We write offwrite-off accounts receivable when they are determined to be uncollectible.  Changes in the allowances for doubtful accounts are recorded as bad debt expense and are included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.


Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, including assets acquired under capital lease obligations, are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.  Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives when placed in service, which are:

Computer equipment and software: 2 to 3 years

Office equipment and furniture: 5 to 7 years

Leasehold improvements: the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease

Significant additions or improvements extending asset lives beyond one year are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.  We also capitalize and amortize eligible costs to acquire or developinternal-use external-use software that are incurred during the development stage.after technological feasibility has been established.  The assets and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are adjusted for asset retirements and disposals with the resulting gain or loss included in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Research and Development

Research and development costs primarily include maintenance and data conversion activities related to our cloud-based supply chain management solutions and are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations.  We test goodwill for impairment annually at November 30, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.  The impairment test is conducted by comparing the fair value of the net assets with the carrying value of the reporting unit.  Fair value is determined using the direct market observation of market price and outstanding equity of the reporting unit at the testing date.  If the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, goodwill may be impaired.  If this occurs, the fair value is then allocated to its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill.  This implied fair value is then compared to the carrying amount of goodwill and, if it is less, we would recognize an impairment loss.

During 2016, we changed our annual impairment testing date from December 31 to November 30. This voluntary change in accounting principle, applied prospectively, is preferable as it allows more timely completion of our annual impairment test and does not delay, accelerate, or avoid an impairment charge.

Intangible Assets

Assets acquired in business combinations may include identifiable intangible assets such as subscriber relationships andnon-competition agreements.  We recognize separately from goodwill the fair value of the identifiable intangible assets acquired.  We have determined the fair value and useful lives of our purchased intangible assets using certain estimates and assumptions that we believe are reasonable.

The purchased intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which are three to nineten years for subscriber relationships, two to five years fornon-competition agreements and one to fourten years for technology and other.

Internal-use Software Implementation Assets

Internal-use software implementation costs are capitalized assets included in Other Assets and relate to costs incurred during the application development stage for various internal-use software from hosting arrangements.  

Capitalized implementation costs are recognized on a straight-line basis beginning when the application is ready for its intended use and ending on the expected termination date of the hosting arrangement, including consideration of the noncancelable contractual term and reasonably certain renewals.  

The terms are between four and five years for our current hosting arrangements.  Recognized expense is reported in general and administrative expense, which is where the hosting arrangement subscriptions are reported.


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets at the date it is tested for recoverability, whether in use or under development.  An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value.

Revenue Recognition

We generate revenues by providing a number of solutions to our customers. These solutions include Trading Partner Fulfillment, Trading Partner Enablement and Trading Partner Analytics. Our cloud-based solutions allow customers to meet their supply chain management requirements. Sales taxes are presented on a net basis within revenue.

Revenues are recognized when all ofour services are made available to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we are contractually and legally entitled to in exchange for those services.

We determine revenue recognition through the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidencesteps:

-

Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer

-

Identification of the performance obligations in the contract

-

Determination of the transaction price

-

Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

-

Recognition of revenue when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation

See Note C for further descriptions of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred, (3) the fee is fixed or determinable,our revenue recognition policy.

Deferred Costs

Deferred costs consist of costs to obtain customer contracts, such as commissions paid to sales personnel and (4) collectability is probable. If collection is not considered probable,to third-party partners for customer referrals, and costs to fulfill customer contracts, such as customer implementation costs.

Sales commissions relating to recurring revenues are recognized whenconsidered incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a contract with our customer.  These commissions are calculated based on estimated annual recurring revenue to be generated over the fees are collected.

Fees related to our Trading Partner Fulfillment and Trading Partner Analytics solutions consist of two revenue sources:set-up fees and recurring monthly fees.Set-up fees are specific for each connection a customer has with a trading partner and most of our customers have connections with numerous trading partners.Set-up fees are nonrefundable upfront fees that do not have standalone value to our customer and are not separable from the recurring monthly fees. Allset-up fees and relatedcustomer’s initial contract year.  These costs are deferred and recognized ratablyamortized over the average lifeexpected period of the connection between the customer and the trading partner,benefit which is approximatelywe have determined to be two years.  We begin recognizingset-up fee revenue once the connectionAmortization expense is established.Set-up fees for which connections have not yet been established are classified as long-term. We continue to evaluate the length of the amortization period as more experience is gained with cancellationsincluded in sales and technology changes requested by our customers. It is possible that,marketing expenses in the future, the period over which such subscriptionset-up fees and costs are amortized may be adjusted. Any change in our estimateaccompanying condensed consolidated statements of the average connection life will affect our future results of operations. The recurring monthly fees are comprised of both fixed and transaction-based fees that are recognized as earned.comprehensive income.

Stock-Based Compensation

We recognize the cost of all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, in the financial statements based on the grant date fair value of those awards.  This cost is recognized over the period for which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. Benefits associated with tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation expense are reported as a cash flow from financing activities.

We estimate the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results differ from our estimates, such amounts will be recorded as an adjustment in the period estimates are revised. In valuing share-based awards, judgment is required in determining the expected volatility of common stock and the expected term individuals will hold their share-based awards prior to exercising.  The expected volatility of the options is based on the historical volatility of our common stock.  The expected term of the options is based on the simplified method which does not consider historical employee exercise behavior.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are charged to expense  The valuation does not include a forfeiture estimate as incurred. Advertising costs were approximately $61,000, $47,000, and $23,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Advertising costs are included in sales and marketing expenses in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.we recognize forfeitures as they occur.


Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, itin our judgement, there is not “more likelya less than not”a 50% likelihood that the deferred tax asset will be utilized.

We assess our ability to realize our deferred tax assets at the end of each reporting period.  Realization of our deferred tax assets is contingent upon future taxable earnings.  Accordingly, this assessment requires significant estimates and judgment.  If the estimates of future taxable income vary from actual results, our assessment

regarding the realization of these deferred tax assets could change.  Future changes in the estimated amount of deferred taxes expected to be realized will be reflected in our consolidated financial statements in the period the estimate is changed, with a corresponding adjustment to our operating results.

We recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would “more likely than not” sustain the position following an audit.  For tax positions meeting the “more likely than not” threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.

Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.  Diluted net income per share also includes the impact of our outstanding potential common shares, including options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards.  Potential common shares that are anti-dilutive are excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share.

RecentRecently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)ASU No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Other Assets and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers (Subtopic 340-40), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  This guidance will replacereplaced most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective.GAAP. Topic 606 also includes Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs – Contracts with Customers, which requires the deferral of incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer. Collectively, we refer to Topic 606 and Subtopic 340-40 as the “new standard”. These new requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods.

We do not believeadopted the new revenue recognition standard will materiallyeffective January 1, 2018, on a retrospective basis.  The new standard did not impact our recognition of the primary feesrecurring revenue received from customers for our cloud-based supply chain solutions. We believesolutions; however, the adoption of the new standard could impactimpacted our accounting for certain upfrontset-up fees, and the periods over which the related revenues are recognized as well asand the timing of costrevenue recognition for sales commissions and other contract acquisition costs. We are currently evaluating implementation methods and the extentthese set-up fees.  The adoption of the impactnew standard also impacted our accounting for certain costs to obtain our contracts, specifically related to the periods over which commissions are recognized.  


Selected audited consolidated balance sheet line items, which reflect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

As previously

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

reported

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

As adjusted

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred costs

 

$

25,091

 

 

$

4,875

 

 

$

29,966

 

Deferred costs, non-current

 

 

6,770

 

 

 

3,197

 

 

 

9,967

 

Deferred income tax asset

 

 

17,551

 

 

 

(3,854

)

 

 

13,697

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued compensation

 

 

15,886

 

 

 

(658

)

 

 

15,228

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

16,407

 

 

 

1,456

 

 

 

17,863

 

Deferred revenue, non-current

 

 

10,602

 

 

 

(7,871

)

 

 

2,731

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(19,902

)

 

 

11,291

 

 

 

(8,611

)

Selected audited consolidated statement of operations line items, which reflect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

As previously

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

reported

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

As adjusted

 

Revenues

 

$

193,295

 

 

$

(142

)

 

$

193,153

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

65,886

 

 

 

990

 

 

 

66,876

 

Income from operations

 

 

7,517

 

 

 

(1,132

)

 

 

6,385

 

Income tax expense

 

 

3,140

 

 

 

(385

)

 

 

2,755

 

Net income

 

$

5,710

 

 

$

(747

)

 

$

4,963

 

Net income per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.34

 

 

 

(0.05

)

 

$

0.29

 

Diluted

 

$

0.33

 

 

 

(0.04

)

 

$

0.29

 

 

 

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

As previously

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

reported

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

As adjusted

 

Revenues

 

$

220,566

 

 

$

(481

)

 

$

220,085

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

 

 

73,295

 

 

 

(2,034

)

 

 

71,261

 

Income from operations

 

 

8,428

 

 

 

1,553

 

 

 

9,981

 

Income tax expense

 

 

11,580

 

 

 

(1,238

)

 

 

10,342

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(2,440

)

 

$

2,791

 

 

$

351

 

Net income (loss) per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.14

)

 

 

0.16

 

 

$

0.02

 

Diluted

 

$

(0.14

)

 

 

0.16

 

 

$

0.02

 


Selected audited consolidated statement of cash flows line items, which reflect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

As previously

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

reported

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

As adjusted

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

5,710

 

 

$

(747

)

 

$

4,963

 

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(1,698

)

 

 

(385

)

 

 

(2,083

)

Changes in assets and liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred costs

 

 

(4,964

)

 

 

879

 

 

 

(4,085

)

Accrued compensation

 

 

2,180

 

 

 

111

 

 

 

2,291

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

2,710

 

 

 

142

 

 

 

2,852

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

18,765

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,765

 

 

 

For the twelve months ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

As previously

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

reported

 

 

Adjustments

 

 

As adjusted

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(2,440

)

 

$

2,791

 

 

$

351

 

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

10,854

 

 

 

(1,238

)

 

 

9,616

 

Changes in assets and liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred costs

 

 

(6,548

)

 

 

(1,265

)

 

 

(7,813

)

Accrued compensation

 

 

2,073

 

 

 

(769

)

 

 

1,304

 

Deferred revenue

 

 

5,107

 

 

 

481

 

 

 

5,588

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

31,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,050

 

In January 2018, we adopted FASB ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as business acquisitions or as an asset acquisition.  The new standard specifies the required inputs and processes that implementationare necessary to be a business. The adoption of this standard will haveimpacted our accounting for business combinations.  See Note B for additional information regarding business combinations.

In March 2018, we adopted FASB ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which updates the income tax accounting in U.S. GAAP to reflect the SEC interpretive guidance released on our consolidated financial statements uponDecember 22, 2017, when the Tax Act was signed into law. Additional information regarding the adoption of this standard is contained in Note M.

In November 2015,August 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2015-17,Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which amends the guidance requiring companies to separate deferred income tax liabilities 2018-15, Intangibles – Goodwill and assets into current andnon-current amountsOther – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a classified statement of financial position. This accounting guidance simplifiesCloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which aligns the presentation of deferred income taxes, such that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified asnon-currentrequirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a classified statement of financial position. This accounting guidancehosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The standard is effective for usinterim and annual reporting periods beginning inafter December 15, 2019 and can be applied either prospectively to implementation costs incurred after the first quarterdate of 2017, but we electedadoption or retrospectively to all arrangements, with early adopt this guidance prospectivelyadoption permitted.

We early adopted ASU 2018-15 as of December 31, 2015. As a result, we have classified all deferred tax liabilities and assets asnon-current inOctober 1, 2018, under the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.prospective method. Additional disclosure regarding capitalized implementation costs is included within Note I.


Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, 2016-02,LeasesLeases, which will supersede the existing lease guidance and will require all leases with a term greater than 12 months to be recognized in the statements of financial position and eliminate current real estate-specific lease guidance, while maintaining substantially similar classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted.

We believe the adoption ofadopted the new lease accountingstandard on January 1, 2019 and used the effective date as our date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will materially impactnot be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019.

The new standard provides several optional practical expedients in transition. For the fiscal period beginning January 1, 2019, we have made the following elections.  We elected the “package of practical expedients,” which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our consolidatedprior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We did not elect the use-of hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements; the latter not being applicable to us.  The new standard also provided practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify which means we have not recognized right-of-use (“ROU”) assets or lease liabilities for these leases, and this included not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. We also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all leases.

This standard has a material effect on our financial statements by increasing ournon-currentbeginning January 1, 2019. The most significant effects relate to the recognition of approximately $15.0 million in ROU assets andnon-current $15.0 million additional lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets in order to record the right of use assets and related lease liabilitiessheet for our existing operating leases.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendment in this update replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses on instruments within its scope, including trade receivables. This update is intended to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses. This ASU is effective for annual periods and interim periods for those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Entities may early adopt beginning after December 15, 2018. We are incurrently evaluating the processimpact of determining the financial statement impact and are currently unable to estimate the impactadoption of ASU 2016-13 on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016,February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, 2016-09,Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) Improvements, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which permits entities to make an accounting policy election related to how forfeitures will impactretained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the recognition of compensation cost for stock-based compensation,Tax Act and also eliminates the requirement that excessrequires certain disclosures regarding stranded tax benefits be realized as a reductioneffects in current taxes payable before the associated tax benefit can be recognized as an increase in paid in capital.accumulated other comprehensive income.  This standardguidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016,2018, with early adoption permitted.permitted during interim or annual periods.  We expect that our previously unrecognized federal and state net operating losses ($46.2 million and $10.7 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2016) will be included in the deferred tax assets recognized in our consolidated balance sheets on a modified retrospective basis as of January 1, 2017. Withbelieve the adoption of ASU2016-09 wethis standard will also be required to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity in the same manner as other cash flows related to income taxesnot have a material impact on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity.our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE B – Business Acquisitions

Toolbox Solutions, Inc.EDIAdmin

On January 5, 2016,October 3, 2018, we completed our asset acquisition of all of the outstanding common shares of Toolbox Solutions, Inc. (“Toolbox Solutions”),EDIAdmin, a privately held company providingpoint-of-sale analytics end-to-end integration solutions, featuring a dedicated Integration Platform as a Service (“iPaaS”) called Cloud Hybrid Integration Platform (“CHIP”) and category managementcollaborative managed services to retailersfor leading systems and consumer packaged goods suppliers in North America. This acquisition expanded our retail networkapplications, both cloud and strengthened our analytics offerings.on-premise. Pursuant to the shareasset purchase agreement, we paid $18.0$7.5 million in cash and issued $2.9 million in stock, or 43,953 shares of common stock, to the shareholdersowner of Toolbox Solutions.EDIAdmin.  The purchase agreement also allowed the sellersseller to receive up to 16,222 additional shares of common stock,$1.7 million in cash, which would have becomebecomes payable in first quarter 2020 and 2021 contingent upon the completion of certain revenue milestones none of which were met,at December 31, 2019 and therefore, no additional shares were issued.December 31, 2020.  During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, we recognized other incomeexpense of $1.1$0.1 million in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income due to the remeasurement of thisthe contingent liability.  See Note E for further disclosures on the remeasurement of the contingent liability.  The purchase accounting for the EDIAdmin acquisition is complete as of December 31, 2018.


Purchase Price Allocation

We accounted for the acquisition as a business combination.  We allocated the purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date.  We engaged a third-party valuation firm to assist us in the determination of the value of the purchased intangible assets and of the earn-out liability.  The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill.  Goodwill is attributed to a trained workforce and other buyer-specific value resulting from expected synergies, including long-term cost savings, which are not included in the fair values of identifiable assets.  

The purchase price consisted of the following (in thousands):

Cash

 

$

7,461

 

Fair value of earn-out liability

 

 

1,274

 

 

 

$

8,735

 

The final purchase price is subject to a net working capital adjustment to be determined by the sellers and us, pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement.    

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):

Current assets

 

$

631

 

Goodwill

 

 

4,871

 

Intangible assets

 

 

3,400

 

Current liabilities

 

 

(57

)

Deferred revenue

 

 

(110

)

 

 

$

8,735

 

Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the purchased intangible assets and their estimated useful lives:

 

 

Estimated

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Life

 

Purchased Intangible Assets

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in years)

 

Subscriber relationships

 

$

600

 

 

 

10

 

Developed technology

 

 

2,800

 

 

 

10

 

Total

 

$

3,400

 

 

 

 

 

The purchased intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.  Amortization expense for the period from October 3, 2018 through December 31, 2018 was $0.1 million.

CovalentWorks

On December 18, 2018, we completed our asset acquisition of CovalentWorks, a privately held company providing cloud-based EDI solutions to small- and medium-sized businesses. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, we paid $19.4 million in cash and issued $3.4 million in common stock, or 40,478 shares, to the owners of CovalentWorks.  The purchase accounting for the CovalentWorks acquisition has not been finalized as of December 31, 2018.  Provisional amounts are primarily related to intangible assets.  We expect to finalize the allocation of purchase price within the one-year measurement-period following the acquisition.


Purchase Price Allocation

We accounted for the acquisition as a business combination.  We allocated the purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date.  We engaged a third-party valuation firm to assist us in the determination of the value of the purchased intangible assets.  The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill.  Goodwill is attributed to a trained workforce and other buyer-specific value resulting from expected synergies, including long-term cost savings, which are not included in the fair values of identifiable assets.

The purchase price consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

Cash

  $18,032  

 

$

19,431

 

SPS Commerce, Inc. common stock

   2,922  

 

 

3,371

 

Fair value of share-basedearn-out liability

   1,043  
  

 

 

 

$

22,802

 

  $21,997  
  

 

 

The final purchase price wasis subject to a net working capital adjustment to be determined by usthe sellers and the sellers,us, pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement. The number of shares of our common stock issued for the acquisition was a net of 43,953 shares, which consisted of 48,668 shares issued at closing, as calculated according to the terms of the purchase agreement, less 4,715 shares that were returned to us from escrow in the fourth quarter of 2016.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired, net of cash acquired of $359,000, and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):

Current assets

  $1,253  

Property and equipment

   56  

Goodwill

   15,389  

Intangible assets

   9,070  

Current liabilities

   (1,249

Deferred revenue

   (301

Deferred income tax liability

   (2,221
  

 

 

 
  $21,997  
  

 

 

 

Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the purchased intangible assets and their estimated useful lives:

Purchased Intangible Assets

  Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
   Estimated
Life
(in years)
 

Subscriber relationships

  $7,400     8  

Developed technology

   1,200     4  

Trade names

   70     1  

Non-competition agreements

   400     5  
  

 

 

   

Total

  $9,070    
  

 

 

   

The purchased intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Amortization expense for the period from January 5, 2016 through December 31, 2016 was $1.4 million.

Acquisition-Related Costs and Post-Acquisition Operating Results

Acquisition-related costs were $147,000 and are included in our consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2016. The operating results of Toolbox Solutions have been included in our consolidated financial statements from January 5, 2016, the closing date of the acquisition. For the period from January 5, 2016 through December 31, 2016, approximately $7.9 million of our revenues were derived from Toolbox Solutions’ products and services. The amount of operating income or loss from Toolbox Solutions was not separately identifiable due to our integration.

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below presents the combined operating results of SPS Commerce and Toolbox Solutions as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2015. The unaudited pro forma information includes the historical operating results of each company and pro forma adjustments for the approximately $1.4 million of annual amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets and the additional impact on the provision or benefit for income taxes, resulting from the combined income and intangible amortization expense, using our statutory blended income tax rate of 26.5%.

   Year Ended
December 31,
 
(in thousands, except per share data)  2016   2015 

Pro forma total revenue

  $193,525    $166,873  

Pro forma net income

   5,976     2,400  

Pro forma net income per share

    

Basic

   0.35     0.14  

Diluted

   0.35     0.14  

The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have actually been reported had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2015, nor is it necessarily indicative of our results of operations for any future periods.

Leadtec

On October 12, 2014, we entered into and completed an asset purchase agreement with Leadtec Systems Australia Pty Ltd (“Leadtec”), and its affiliates, Advanced Barcode Solutions Pty Ltd, Scott Needham and Leading Technology Group Pty Ltd. Leadtec is in the business of cloud-based integration solutions. Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, we purchased and acquired from Leadtec substantially all of the assets used in Leadtec’s business and assumed certain liabilities of Leadtec, all of which were recorded in Australian dollars. We paid $12.6 million in cash and issued 43,595 shares of our common stock for this acquisition, which expanded our base of recurring revenue customers and added suppliers to our network.

Purchase Price Allocation

We accounted for the acquisition as a business combination. We allocated the purchase price to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is attributed to buyer-specific value resulting from expected synergies, including long-term cost savings, as well as a trained workforce which are not included in the fair values of assets. Goodwill will not be amortized; however the value is deductible for tax purposes.

The purchase price consisted of the following (in thousands):

Cash

  $12,595  

SPS Commerce, Inc. common stock

   2,203  
  

 

 

 
  $14,798  
  

 

 

 

The number of shares of our common stock issued for the acquisition was 43,595 shares as calculated according to the terms of the purchase agreement. The fair value of the shares issued was approximately $2.2 million and was determined using the closing price of our common stock on October 10, 2014.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands):

 

Current and other assets

  $659  

Current assets

 

$

244

 

Property and equipment

   143  

 

 

44

 

Goodwill

   9,954  

 

 

15,402

 

Intangible assets

   4,891  

 

 

7,210

 

Current liabilities

   (849

 

 

(56

)

Deferred revenue

 

 

(42

)

  

 

 

 

$

22,802

 

  $14,798  
  

 

 

Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the purchased intangible assets and their estimated useful lives:

 

 

Estimated

 

 

Estimated

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Life

 

Purchased Intangible Assets

  Estimated
Fair Value
(in thousands)
   Estimated
Life
(in years)
 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in years)

 

Subscriber relationships

  $3,778     9  

 

$

7,100

 

 

 

7

 

Non-competition agreements

   148     5  

Technology and other

   965     2.5  
  

 

   

Developed technology

 

 

100

 

 

 

3

 

Trade names

 

 

10

 

 

 

1

 

Total

  $4,891    

 

$

7,210

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

The purchased intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.  Amortization expense related to these intangible assets was $733,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and $168,000 for the period from October 12, 2014December 18, 2018 through December 31, 2014.2018 was not material. 


Acquisition-Related Costs and Post-Acquisition Operating ResultsNOTE C – Revenue

Acquisition-related costs were $690,000, including $338,000We derive our revenues primarily from the following revenue streams (in thousands):  

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Recurring revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fulfillment

 

$

190,783

 

 

$

164,682

 

 

$

139,645

 

Analytics

 

 

34,447

 

 

 

34,260

 

 

 

32,938

 

Other

 

 

5,424

 

 

 

4,978

 

 

 

4,474

 

Recurring Revenues

 

 

230,654

 

 

 

203,920

 

 

 

177,057

 

One-time revenues

 

 

17,586

 

 

 

16,165

 

 

 

16,096

 

 

 

$

248,240

 

 

$

220,085

 

 

$

193,153

 

Revenues are recognized when our services are made available to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we are contractually and legally entitled to in exchange for those services.

We determine revenue recognition through the following steps:

-

Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer

-

Identification of the performance obligations in the contract

-

Determination of the transaction price

-

Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

-

Recognition of revenue when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation

Recurring Revenues

Recurring revenues consists of recurring subscriptions from customers that utilize our Fulfillment, Analytics and Other cloud-based supply chain management solutions.  Revenue for these solutions is generally recognized on aone-time Australian stamp duty tax, ratable basis over the contract term beginning on the date that our service is made available to the customer.  Our contracts with our recurring revenue customers are recurring in nature, ranging from monthly to annual, and generally allow the customer to cancel the contract for any reason with 30 to 90 days’ notice.  Timing of billings varies by customer and by contract type and are includedeither in our consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2014. The operating results of Leadtec have been included in our consolidated financial statements from October 12, 2014, the closing dateadvance or within 30 days of the acquisition. For the period from October 12, 2014 through December 31, 2014, revenues of approximately $1.2 million and an operating loss of approximately $280,000 were attributable to Leadtec.

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Informationservice being performed.

The unaudited pro forma financialdeferred revenue liabilities for recurring revenue contracts are for one year or less and recognized on a ratable basis over the contract term. We have applied the optional exemption under ASC 606-10-50-14(a) and will not disclose information inabout the remaining performance obligations for contracts which have original durations of one year or less.

One-time Revenues

One-time revenues consist of set-up fees from customers and miscellaneous one-time fees.

Set-up fees are specific for each connection a customer has with a trading partner and many of our customers have connections with numerous trading partners.  Set-up fees related to our cloud-based supply chain management solutions are nonrefundable upfront fees that are necessary for our customers to utilize our cloud-based services.  These set-up fees do not provide any standalone value to our customers.  Except for our Analytics solution, we have determined that the set-up fees represent a material renewal option right to our customers as they will not be incurred again upon renewal.  These set-up fees and related costs are deferred and recognized ratably over two years, which is the estimated period for which a material right is present for our customers.  For our Analytics solution, we have determined that the set-up fees do not represent a material customer renewal right and, as such, are deferred and recognized ratably over the estimated initial contract term, which is one year.


The table below presents the combined operating resultsactivity of SPS Commercethe portion of the deferred revenue liability relating to set-up fees (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balances, at beginning of period

 

$

10,031

 

 

$

9,995

 

Invoiced set-up fees

 

 

10,271

 

 

 

10,625

 

Amortized set-up fees

 

 

(10,445

)

 

 

(10,589

)

Balances, at end of period

 

$

9,857

 

 

$

10,031

 

The entire balance of set-up fees will be recognized within two years and, Leadtec as ifsuch, current amounts will be recognized in the acquisition had occurrednext 1-12 months and long-term amounts will be recognized in the next 13-24 months.

Miscellaneous one-time fees consist of professional services and testing and certification. The deferred revenue liability for these one-time fees are for one year or less and recognized at the time service is provided. We have applied the optional exemption under ASC 606-10-50-14(a) and will not disclose information about the remaining performance obligations for contracts which have original durations of one year or less.

NOTE D – Deferred Costs

Deferred costs consist of costs to obtain customer contracts, such as commissions paid to sales personnel and to third-party partners for customer referrals, and costs to fulfill customer contracts, such as customer implementation costs.

Sales commissions relating to recurring revenues are considered incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a contract with our customer.  These commissions are calculated based on January 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma information includesestimated annual recurring revenue to be generated over the historical operating results of each companycustomer’s initial contract year.  These costs are deferred and pro forma adjustments for annual amortization expense related to purchased intangible assets andamortized over the expected tax impact considering our current tax electionsperiod of benefit which we have determined to be two years.  Amortization expense is included in sales and representations.marketing expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The table below presents the activity of deferred costs and amortization of deferred costs (in thousands):

 

   Year Ended
December 31,
 
(in thousands, except per share data)  2014 

Pro forma total revenue

  $132,818  

Pro forma net income

   2,973  

Pro forma net income per share

  

Basic

   0.18  

Diluted

   0.18  

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balances, at beginning of period

 

$

39,933

 

 

$

32,117

 

Incurred deferred costs

 

 

49,583

 

 

 

44,628

 

Amortized deferred costs

 

 

(44,041

)

 

 

(36,812

)

Balances, at end of period

 

$

45,475

 

 

$

39,933

 

The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have actually been reported had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2013, nor is it necessarily indicative of our results of operations for any future periods.

NOTE CE – Financial Instruments

We invest primarily in money market funds, certificates of deposit, highly liquid debt instruments of the U.S. government and U.S. corporate debt securities.  All highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less are classified as cash equivalents.  All investments with original maturities greater than 90 days and remaining maturities less than one year from the balance sheet date are classified as short-term marketable securities.investments.  Investments with remaining maturities of more than one year from the balance sheet date are classified as marketable securities,non-current. Short-termlong-term investments.

Our short- and long-term marketable securities and marketable securities,non-current,are also classified asavailable-for-sale.  We intend to hold marketable securities until maturity; however, we may sell these securities at any time for use in current operations or for other purposes.  Consequently, we may or may not keep securities with stated holding periods to maturity.


Our fixed income investmentsmarketable securities are carried at fair value and unrealized gains and losses on these investments, net of taxes, are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance sheets.  Realized gains or losses are included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.  When a determination has been made that an other-than-temporary decline in fair value has occurred, the amount of the decline that is related to a credit loss is realized and is included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Cash equivalents and marketable securities,short- and long-term investments consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

  December 31, 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

  2016   2015 

 

Amortized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

 

Amortized

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

  Amortized
Cost
   Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 Fair Value   Amortized
Cost
   Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
 Fair Value 

 

Cost

 

 

Gains (Losses)

 

 

Value

 

 

Cost

 

 

Gains (Losses)

 

 

Value

 

Cash equivalents:

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

  $75,375    $   $75,375    $79,717    $   $79,717  

 

$

109,265

 

 

$

 

 

$

109,265

 

 

$

104,544

 

 

$

 

 

$

104,544

 

Certificate of deposit

 

 

7,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,000

 

 

 

7,814

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,814

 

Marketable securities:

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

   15,681     (96  15,585     10,042     (34  10,008  

 

 

15,194

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

15,234

 

 

 

17,758

 

 

 

(57

)

 

 

17,701

 

Commercial paper

   4,977     10    4,987     2,499     1    2,500  

 

 

9,889

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

9,965

 

 

 

7,456

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

7,476

 

U.S. treasury securities

   7,489     10    7,499     7,489     (27  7,462  

 

 

12,300

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

12,338

 

 

 

12,381

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

12,407

 

U.S. agency obligations

   2,497     3    2,500     2,497     1    2,498  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 
  $106,019    $(73 $105,946    $102,244    $(59 $102,185  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

$

153,648

 

 

$

154

 

 

$

153,802

 

 

$

149,953

 

 

$

(11

)

 

$

149,942

 

Due within one year

     $98,452       $87,235  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

153,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

144,736

 

Due within two years

      7,494        14,950  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,206

 

     

 

      

 

 

Total

     $105,946       $102,185  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

153,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

149,942

 

     

 

      

 

 

We do not believe any of the unrealized losses represent an other-than-temporary impairment based on our assessment of available evidence as of December 31, 2016.2018.  We expect to receive the full principal and interest on all of these cash equivalents and marketable securities.investments.

Fair Value Measurements

We measure certain financial assets at fair value on a recurring basis based on a fair value hierarchy that requires us to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when

measuring fair value.  A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are:

Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilitiesliabilities.

Level 2 observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as (a) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, (b) quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or (c) model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.  We obtain the fair values of our level 2 available-for-sale securities from a professional pricing service.

Level 3 unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.

Level 1 Measurements

Our cash equivalents held in money market funds are measured atFor the earn-out liability related to the EDIAdmin acquisition, the Company utilized the Monte Carlo simulation method to estimate the fair value of this contingent liability as of the reporting date.  Thousands of iterations of the simulation were performed using level 1 inputs.

Level 2 Measurements

Ouravailable-for-sale U.S. treasury securities, U.S. agency obligations, commercial paper and corporate debt securities are measured atforecasted revenues to develop a distribution of future values of recurring revenue which, in turn, provide indicated earn-out payments.  The total estimated fair value using level 2 inputs. We obtainequals the fairsum of the average present values of our level 2available-for-sale securities fromthe indicated earn-out payments.  Changes in assumptions described above could have an impact on the payout of contingent consideration with a professional pricing service.maximum payout being $1.7 million.  The earn-out liability has been measured as Level 3 given the unobservable inputs that are significant to the measurement of the liability.


The following table presents information about our financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such fair value (in thousands):

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Assets at December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

 

$

109,265

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

109,265

 

Certificate of deposit

 

 

7,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,000

 

Marketable securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

 

 

 

15,234

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,234

 

Commercial paper

 

 

 

 

 

9,965

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,965

 

U.S. treasury securities

 

 

 

 

 

12,338

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,338

 

 

$

116,265

 

 

$

37,537

 

 

$

 

 

$

153,802

 

  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets at December 31, 2016:

        

Cash and cash equivalents:

        

Liabilities at December 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earn-out liability

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,368

 

 

$

1,368

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,368

 

 

$

1,368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets at December 31, 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds

  $75,375    $    $    $75,375  

 

$

104,544

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

104,544

 

Certificate of deposit

 

 

7,814

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,814

 

Marketable securities:

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

        15,585          15,585  

 

 

 

 

 

17,701

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,701

 

Commerical paper

        4,987          4,987  

Commercial paper

 

 

 

 

 

7,476

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,476

 

U.S. treasury securities

        7,499          7,499  

 

 

 

 

 

12,407

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,407

 

U.S. agency obligations

        2,500          2,500  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

$

112,358

 

 

$

37,584

 

 

$

 

 

$

149,942

 

  $75,375    $30,571    $    $105,946  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Assets at December 31, 2015:

        

Cash and cash equivalents:

        

Money market funds

  $79,717    $    $    $79,717  

Marketable securities:

        

Corporate bonds

        10,008          10,008  

Commerical paper

        2,500          2,500  

U.S. treasury securities

        7,462          7,462  

U.S. agency obligations

        2,498          2,498  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $79,717    $22,468    $    $102,185  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

NOTE DF – Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts activity, included in accounts receivable, net, was as follows (in thousands):

 

  2016   2015   2014 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Balances, January 1

  $446    $279    $237  

 

$

763

 

 

$

515

 

 

$

446

 

Provision for doubtful accounts

   1,375     1,271     717  

 

 

2,590

 

 

 

1,705

 

 

 

1,375

 

Write-offs, net of recoveries

   (1,306   (1,104   (675

 

 

(1,961

)

 

 

(1,457

)

 

 

(1,306

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Balances, December 31

  $515    $446    $279  

 

$

1,392

 

 

$

763

 

 

$

515

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 


NOTE EG – Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment, net included the following (in thousands):

 

  December 31, 

 

December 31,

 

  2016   2015 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Computer equipment and software

  $29,270    $27,725  

 

$

44,781

 

 

$

35,326

 

Office equipment and furniture

   7,087     5,793  

 

 

7,985

 

 

 

7,439

 

Leasehold improvements

   7,844     5,530  

 

 

9,366

 

 

 

8,042

 

  

 

   

 

 

 

 

62,132

 

 

 

50,807

 

   44,201     39,048  

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (28,887   (25,428

 

 

(41,175

)

 

 

(33,951

)

  

 

   

 

 

 

$

20,957

 

 

$

16,856

 

  $15,314    $13,620  
  

 

   

 

 

At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, property and equipment, net included approximately $2.1$1.7 million and $709,000,$2.2 million, respectively, of assets held at subsidiary and office locations outside of the United States of America.U.S.

NOTE FH – Goodwill and Intangible Assets, net

The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 20152017 are as follows (in thousands):

 

  2016   2015 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balances, January 1

  $33,848    $34,854  

 

$

51,613

 

 

$

49,777

 

Additions from business acquisitions

   15,389     —    

 

 

20,272

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

   540     (1,006

 

 

(2,227

)

 

 

1,836

 

  

 

   

 

 

Balances, December 31

  $49,777    $33,848  

 

$

69,658

 

 

$

51,613

 

  

 

   

 

 

Intangible assets, net included the following (in thousands):

 

  December 31, 2016 

 

December 31, 2018

 

  Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Foreign
Currency
Translation
   Net 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Foreign

Currency

Translation

 

 

Net

 

Subscriber relationships

  $33,736    $(15,708  $295    $18,323  

 

$

43,212

 

 

$

(23,284

)

 

$

(623

)

 

$

19,305

 

Non-competition agreements

   2,234     (1,818   17     433  

 

 

2,560

 

 

 

(2,247

)

 

 

(28

)

 

 

285

 

Technology and other

   2,089     (1,120   63     1,032  

 

 

5,199

 

 

 

(2,012

)

 

 

(36

)

 

 

3,151

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

$

50,971

 

 

$

(27,543

)

 

$

(687

)

 

$

22,741

 

  $38,059    $(18,646  $375    $19,788  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Foreign

Currency

Translation

 

 

Net

 

Subscriber relationships

 

$

34,350

 

 

$

(19,592

)

 

$

614

 

 

$

15,372

 

Non-competition agreements

 

 

2,499

 

 

 

(2,058

)

 

 

45

 

 

 

486

 

Technology and other

 

 

2,130

 

 

 

(1,518

)

 

 

59

 

 

 

671

 

 

 

$

38,979

 

 

$

(23,168

)

 

$

718

 

 

$

16,529

 


   December 31, 2015 
   Carrying
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Foreign
Currency
Translation
   Net 

Subscriber relationships

  $26,701    $(11,856  $(364  $14,481  

Non-competition agreements

   1,843     (1,653   (9   181  

Technology and other

   905     (400   (86   419  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $29,449    $(13,909  $(459  $15,081  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amortization expense was $4.7 $4.1million, $3.3 $4.6million and $2.9 $4.7million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015,2018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.  At December 31, 2016,2018, future amortization expense for intangible assets was as follows (in thousands):

 

2017

  $4,380  

2018

   3,793  

2019

   3,502  

 

$

5,026

 

2020

   3,174  

 

 

4,679

 

2021

   2,381  

 

 

3,845

 

2022

 

 

2,742

 

2023

 

 

2,668

 

Thereafter

   2,558  

 

 

3,781

 

  

 

 

 

$

22,741

 

  $19,788  
  

 

 

NOTE GI – Other Assets

The changes in the net amount of capitalized implementation costs for internal-use software from hosting arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Balances, January 1

 

$

 

 

$

 

Capitalized implementation fees

 

 

455

 

 

 

 

Amortization of implementation fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances, December 31

 

$

455

 

 

$

 

There were no impairment losses in relation to the capitalized implementation costs for the periods presented.

NOTE J – Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

We are obligated undernon-cancellable operating leases primarily for office space.  Rent expense for all operating leases, which includes minimum lease payments and other charges such as common area maintenance fees, charged to operations was $5.0$5.6 million, $4.6$4.9 million and $3.7$5.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

On June 30, 2016,December 20, 2017, we executed a newthe fourth amendment to our lease agreement atfor our Toronto office location which commenced on January 1, 2017 andcurrent headquarters located in Minneapolis, Minnesota where we lease approximately 189,000 square feet under an agreement that expires on December 31, 2021. TheApril 30, 2025.  We have agreed to expand our headquarters premises by approximately 25,000 square feet during 2020. Our lease agreement also includes a further expansion right and a right of first offer to lease certain additional space and one optiontwo options to extend the term of the lease for five years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease.  There was also a rent holidayWe received $3.2 million in incentives upon execution of two monthsthe amendment and we are owed an additional $2.1 million in incentives upon expansion of our square footage in 2018, both of which hashave been incorporated into our deferred rent calculation.

On September 1, 2015, we executed a new lease agreement at our New Jersey office location which commenced on February 1, 2016 and expires on June 30, 2023. The lease includes a right of first offer to lease certain additional space and one option to extend the term of the lease for five years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease. There was also a rent holiday of five months which has been incorporated into our deferred rent calculation.

On February 14, 2012, we executed a new lease agreement for our current headquarters location which commenced on November 1, 2012 and expires on April 30, 2020. The lease includes additional square footage upon commencement, a right of first offer to lease certain additional space, which we exercised, and two options to extend the term of the lease for three years at a market rate determined in accordance with the lease. There was also a rent holiday from November 2012 to October 2013 which has been incorporated into our deferred rent calculation.

At December 31, 2016,2018, our future minimum payments under operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

 

2017

  $3,318  

2018

   3,123  

2019

   3,220  

 

$

4,209

 

2020

   1,825  

 

 

3,542

 

2021

   1,047  

 

 

4,414

 

2022

 

 

4,042

 

2023

 

 

3,854

 

Thereafter

   1,174  

 

 

4,817

 

  

 

 

 

$

24,878

 

  $13,707  
  

 

 

Other Contingencies

We may be involved in various claims and legal actions in the normal course of business.  Our management believes that the outcome of any such claims and legal actions will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE HK – Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock Issued

In connection with the acquisition of Toolbox SolutionsCovalentWorks (see Note B), we issued a net40,478 shares of 43,953 shares which consisted of 48,668 shares issued at closing,SPS common stock as calculated according to the terms of the purchase agreement, less 4,715 shares that were returned to us from escrow in the fourth quarter of 2016.agreement. The fair value of the shares we issued of  approximately $2.9$3.4 million was determined using the closing price of our common stock on January 5, 2016.December 18, 2018, the closing date of the transaction. 

Stock Repurchase Program

On October 12, 2014, in connection with the acquisitionNovember 2, 2017, our board of Leadtec (see Note B), we issued 43,595 sharesdirectors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of our common stock.  Under the program, purchases may be made from time to time in the open market over two years.  The fair valuenumber of shares to be purchased and the shares we issued, approximately $2.2 million, was determined usingtiming of purchases will be based on the closing price of our common stock, general business and market conditions and other investment considerations and factors.

The program does not obligate us to repurchase any specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice.  We intend to finance the share repurchase program with cash on October 10, 2014.hand.

We repurchased 289,745 shares at a cost of $19.9 million and 122,147 shares at a cost of $5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.  Of the $50.0 million share repurchases authorized, $24.3 million was available for future share repurchases at December 31, 2018.

NOTE IL – Stock-Based Compensation

Our equity compensation plans provide for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options, as well as other stock-based awards including restricted stock and restricted stock units, to employees,non-employee directors and other consultants who provide services to us.  Restricted stock awards result in the issuance of new shares when granted.  For other stock-based awards, new shares are issued when the award is exercised, vested or released according to the terms of the agreement.  In January 2018 and February 2016, 1,003,4392017, 1,027,620 and 1,024,868 additional shares, respectively, were reserved for future issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.  At December 31, 2016,2018, there were approximately 3.95.3 million shares available for grant under approved equity compensation plans.

We recorded stock-based compensation expense of $8.0$12.5 million, $6.4$12.7 million and $5.4$8.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 2015respectively.  During the year ended December 31, 2017, stock-based compensation expense included a one-time $3.6 million charge due to a modification to our Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement which resulted in immediate vesting, and 2014, respectively. Thisexpensing, of his outstanding stock-based compensation awards based on his retirement eligibility.  Stock-based compensation expense was allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2016   2015   2014 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Cost of revenues

  $1,309    $989    $614  

 

$

2,168

 

 

$

1,887

 

 

$

1,309

 

Operating expenses

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales and marketing

   2,412     1,978     1,933  

 

 

2,675

 

 

 

2,197

 

 

 

2,412

 

Research and development

   618     640     444  

 

 

1,505

 

 

 

949

 

 

 

618

 

General and administrative

   3,684     2,772     2,405  

 

 

6,162

 

 

 

7,694

 

 

 

3,684

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense

  $8,023    $6,379    $5,396  

 

$

12,510

 

 

$

12,727

 

 

$

8,023

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 


Stock-based compensation expense by type was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Stock Options

 

$

3,355

 

 

$

5,223

 

 

$

3,777

 

Performance Share Units

 

 

1,034

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

5,930

 

 

 

6,526

 

 

 

3,386

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

 

487

 

 

 

318

 

 

 

308

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

 

466

 

 

 

660

 

 

 

552

 

401K Stock Match

 

 

1,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 

$

12,510

 

 

$

12,727

 

 

$

8,023

 

As of December 31, 2016,2018, there was approximately $13.7 $13.6million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense under our equity compensation plans, which is expected to be recognized on a straight linestraight-line basis over a weighted averageweighted-average period of 2.562.3 years.

Stock Options

Stock options generally vest over four years and have a contractual term of seven to ten years from the date of grant.  Our stock option activity was as follows:

 

   Options
(#)
   Weighted Average
Exercise Price

($/share)
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2014

   1,097,223    $19.62  

Granted

   153,770     62.86  

Exercised

   (153,196   12.27  

Forfeited

   (12,334   41.38  
  

 

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

   1,085,463     26.53  

Granted

   181,487     67.50  

Exercised

   (305,106   14.55  

Forfeited

   (18,741   45.82  
  

 

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

   943,103     37.91  

Granted

   340,609     48.58  

Exercised

   (221,630   19.42  

Forfeited

   (46,070   55.58  
  

 

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   1,016,012     44.72  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

Options

 

 

Exercise Price

 

 

 

(#)

 

 

($/share)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

 

 

943,103

 

 

$

37.91

 

Granted

 

 

340,609

 

 

 

48.58

 

Exercised

 

 

(221,630

)

 

 

19.42

 

Forfeited

 

 

(46,070

)

 

 

55.58

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

 

1,016,012

 

 

 

44.72

 

Granted

 

 

172,697

 

 

 

55.87

 

Exercised

 

 

(65,502

)

 

 

21.53

 

Forfeited

 

 

(25,876

)

 

 

55.93

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

1,097,331

 

 

 

47.60

 

Granted

 

 

181,472

 

 

 

59.88

 

Exercised

 

 

(344,334

)

 

 

41.66

 

Forfeited

 

 

(61,235

)

 

 

56.67

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

873,234

 

 

 

51.86

 

Of the total outstanding options at December 31, 2016, 582,6502018, 576,842 were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $38.43$50.10 per share.  The total outstanding options had a weighted average remaining contractual life of 4.64.0 years.

The fair value of options that vested during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015 and 2014 was $3.4$3.7 million, $3.1$4.2 million and $2.9$3.4 million, respectively.

The intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015 and 2014 was $8.6$14.9 million, $16.8$2.8 million and $7.4$8.6 million, respectively.  The intrinsic value of outstanding options at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015was $26.7 million, $7.3 million and 2014 was $25.6 million, $30.5 million and $33.8 million, respectively.


The weighted-average fair values per share of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 2015were $19.48, $18.85 and 2014 were $16.13, $23.09 and $24.36, respectively.  The fair values of the options granted were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

      2016         2015         2014     

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Volatility

   38  39  42

 

 

35

%

 

 

38

%

 

 

38

%

Dividend yield

             

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life (in years)

   4.54    4.52    4.17  

 

 

4.44

 

 

 

4.51

 

 

 

4.54

 

Risk-free interest rate

   1.19  1.36  1.44

 

 

2.54

%

 

 

1.85

%

 

 

1.19

%

The expected volatility of the options is based on the historical volatility of our common stock.  We have not issued dividends on our common stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future.  The expected term of the options is based on the simplified method which does not consider historical employee exercise behavior.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with maturity dates approximately equal to the expected life at the grant date.

Performance Share Units and Restricted Stock Units and Awards

In February 2018, our executive officers were granted performance share unit (“PSU”) awards with vesting contingent on the Company’s total shareholder return as compared to indexed total shareholder return over the course of a three-year performance period (fiscal years 2018 – 2020).  The grant date fair value was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation that utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the performance conditions stipulated in the award and calculates the fair market value for the performance stock units granted.  Expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied as the likelihood of the market condition being met is included in the fair-value measurement of the award.

In February 2017, our executive officers were granted PSU awards with vesting contingent on successful attainment of pre-determined revenue targets over the course of a three-year performance period (fiscal 2017 – 2019).  The fair value is measured as the number of performance shares expected to be earned multiplied by the grant date fair value of our shares. The number of performance shares expected to vest during the current service period is estimated and the fair value of those shares is recognized over the remaining service period less any amounts already recognized.

Restricted stock units (“RSU”) vest over four years and, upon vesting, the holder is entitled to receive shares of our common stock.  With restricted stock awards (“RSA”), shares of our common stock are issued when the award is granted and the restrictions lapse over one year.


Our restricted stock unitsPSU and RSU activity was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

  Restricted Stock
Units (#)
   Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value ($/share)
 

 

PSUs and RSUs

 

 

Grant Date Fair

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2014

   102,644    $33.77  

Granted

   42,001     64.89  

Vested and common stock issued

   (28,367   32.92  

Forfeited

   (1,145   35.42  
  

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

   115,133     45.25  

Granted

   68,159     67.50  

Vested and common stock issued

   (37,669   40.91  

Forfeited

   (5,058   54.28  
  

 

   

 

(#)

 

 

Value ($/share)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

   140,565     56.88  

 

 

140,565

 

 

$

56.88

 

Granted

   115,896     48.32  

 

 

115,896

 

 

 

48.32

 

Vested and common stock issued

   (52,133   48.19  

 

 

(52,133

)

 

 

48.19

 

Forfeited

   (15,286   55.48  

 

 

(15,286

)

 

 

55.48

 

  

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   189,042     54.14  

 

 

189,042

 

 

 

54.14

 

  

 

   

Granted

 

 

211,168

 

 

 

55.62

 

Vested and common stock issued

 

 

(64,950

)

 

 

53.64

 

Forfeited

 

 

(13,348

)

 

 

55.39

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

321,912

 

 

 

55.16

 

Granted

 

 

172,795

 

 

 

66.03

 

Vested and common stock issued

 

 

(81,561

)

 

 

56.32

 

Forfeited

 

 

(35,811

)

 

 

55.04

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

377,335

 

 

 

59.90

 

The number of restricted stock unitsPSUs and RSUs outstanding at December 31, 20162018 included 34,19054,688 units that have vested, but the shares of common stock have not yet been issued pursuant to the terms of the agreement.

Our restricted stock awardsRSA activity was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

  Restricted
Stock  Awards
(#)
   Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value ($/share)
 

 

RSAs

 

 

Grant Date Fair

 

Outstanding at January 1, 2014

   1,422    $48.66  

Restricted common stock issued

   5,352     51.74  

Restrictions lapsed

   (5,199   51.04  

Forfeited

   (237   48.66  
  

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

   1,338     51.74  

Restricted common stock issued

   4,110     67.37  

Restrictions lapsed

   (4,416   62.63  

Forfeited

          
  

 

   

 

(#)

 

 

Value ($/share)

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

   1,032     67.39  

 

 

1,032

 

 

$

67.39

 

Restricted common stock issued

   6,078     52.27  

 

 

6,078

 

 

 

52.27

 

Restrictions lapsed

   (5,586   55.06  

 

 

(5,586

)

 

 

55.06

 

Forfeited

          
  

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

   1,524     52.28  

 

 

1,524

 

 

 

52.28

 

  

 

   

Restricted common stock issued

 

 

5,454

 

 

 

58.29

 

Restrictions lapsed

 

 

(5,610

)

 

 

56.65

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

 

1,368

 

 

 

58.29

 

Restricted common stock issued

 

 

7,304

 

 

 

74.43

 

Restrictions lapsed

 

 

(6,840

)

 

 

71.20

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

 

 

1,832

 

 

 

74.44

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Effective July 1, 2012, we adoptedWe have an employee stock purchase plan which allows participating employees to purchase shares of our common stock at a discount through payroll deductions.  The plan is available to all employees subject to certain eligibility requirements.  Participating employees may purchase common stock, on a voluntary after tax basis, at a price that is the lower of 85% of the fair market value of one share of common stock at the beginning or end of each stock purchase period.  The plan consists of twosix-month offering periods, beginning on January 1 and July 1 of each calendar year.  A total of 1.11.0 million shares of common stock are reservedremaining for issuance under the plan.

For the offering periods in the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we withheld approximately $1.7 million, $1.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, from employees participating in the plan and we purchased 34,798 shares, 40,968 shares and 33,357 shares, respectively, on their behalf.  For the offering periods in 2015, we withheld approximately $1.5 million from employees participating in the plan and we purchased 28,362 shares on their behalf. For the offering periods in 2014, we withheld approximately $1.3 million from employees participating in the plan and we purchased 26,353 shares on their behalf.

For the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, we recorded approximately $552,000, $408,000$0.5 million, $0.7 million and $473,000$0.6 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense associated with the employee stock purchase plan.  The fair value was estimated based on the market price of our common stock at the beginning of each offering period and using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
       2016          2015          2014     

Volatility

   37  30  45

Dividend yield

             

Life (in years)

   0.50    0.50    0.50  

Risk-free interest rate

   0.42  0.12  0.08

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Volatility

 

 

26

%

 

 

32

%

 

 

37

%

Dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life (in years)

 

 

0.50

 

 

 

0.50

 

 

 

0.50

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.77

%

 

 

0.90

%

 

 

0.42

%

NOTE JM – Income Taxes

The provisionOur provisions for income taxes wasincluded current federal, foreign and state income tax expense, as well as deferred tax expense as follows (in thousands):

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2016   2015   2014 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Current

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

  $3,684    $2,066    $43  

 

$

 

 

$

(184

)

 

$

3,684

 

State

   555     289     254  

 

 

1,103

 

 

 

258

 

 

 

555

 

Foreign

   599     119     80  

 

 

540

 

 

 

652

 

 

 

599

 

Deferred

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

   (988   103     1,183  

 

 

3,011

 

 

 

10,262

 

 

 

(1,337

)

State

   (133   (141   (152

 

 

224

 

 

 

(291

)

 

 

(169

)

Foreign

   (577          

 

 

(410

)

 

 

(355

)

 

 

(577

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

$

4,468

 

 

$

10,342

 

 

$

2,755

 

  $3,140    $2,436    $1,408  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

The tax provision for the year ended December 31, 2017 includes a $0.4 million reclass of alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards from the deferred federal provision to current federal provision. These unutilized AMT credit carryforwards become partially refundable in 2019, 2020 and 2021 and fully refundable in 2022.

A reconciliation of the expected federal income tax at the statutory rate to the provision for income taxes was as follows (in thousands):

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2016   2015   2014 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Expected federal income tax at statutory rate

  $3,011    $2,404    $1,398  

 

$

5,951

 

 

$

3,635

 

 

$

2,662

 

State income taxes, net of federal tax effect

   320     246     124  

 

 

1,293

 

 

 

417

 

 

 

284

 

Tax impact of foreign activity

   (115   39     37  

 

 

57

 

 

 

(105

)

 

 

(115

)

Permanent book/tax differences

   372     67     173  

Nondeductible executive compensation

 

 

902

 

 

 

530

 

 

 

159

 

Nondeductible expenses

 

 

351

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

213

 

Change in valuation allowance

   (35   (27   (88

 

 

(4

)

 

 

16

 

 

 

(35

)

Change in state deferred rate

   (67   (118   (9

 

 

38

 

 

 

(134

)

 

 

(67

)

Research and development credit

   (261   (200   (178

 

 

(1,843

)

 

 

(227

)

 

 

(261

)

Tax impact of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

 

 

 

 

 

6,796

 

 

 

 

Tax impact of stock activity

 

 

(2,438

)

 

 

(925

)

 

 

 

Other

   (85   25     (49

 

 

161

 

 

 

71

 

 

 

(85

)

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total provision for income taxes

  $3,140    $2,436    $1,408  

 

$

4,468

 

 

$

10,342

 

 

$

2,755

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 


The Tax Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2017, reduced the corporate federal income tax rate to 21.0% effective January 1, 2018, resulting in discrete tax expense of $6.8 million for the reduction of deferred tax assets. Also, the Tax Act expanded the deduction limits on executive compensation and included transition rules for previously awarded compensation.

Differences between our effective tax rate and statutory tax rates are primarily due to the federal research and development credit partially offset by permanently non-deductible expense.  Additionally, under ASU 2016-09, excess tax benefits generated upon settlement or exercise of stock awards are now recognized as a reduction to income tax expense as a discrete tax item in the period that the event occurs creating potentially significant fluctuation in tax expense by year.

The significant components of our deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows (in thousands):

 

  December 31, 

 

December 31,

 

  2016 2015 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

Deferred tax assets

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss and credit carryforwards

  $4,614    $4,687   

 

$

8,356

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

11,067

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred operations

   799     1,443   

Stock-based compensation expense

   4,085     3,284   

 

 

3,647

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,273

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

        1,179   

Accounts receivable allowances

   363     252   

 

 

464

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

307

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

   2,704     1,137   

 

 

3,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,126

 

 

 

 

 

Other

   297     234   

 

 

180

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

182

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

  

Gross deferred tax asset

    12,862     12,216  

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,955

 

Less: valuation allowance

   (649   (928 

 

 

(797

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(602

)

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

  

Total net deferred tax asset

    12,213     11,288  

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,035

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,353

 

Deferred tax liability

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred operations

 

 

(2,787

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,850

)

 

 

 

 

Foreign operations

   (350   (139 

 

 

(135

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(133

)

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

   (1,328      

 

 

(2,943

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,536

)

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

  

Other

 

 

(90

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(24

)

 

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liability

    (1,678   (139

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,955

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,543

)

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

   $10,535    $11,149  

 

 

 

 

 

$

9,080

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

11,810

 

   

 

   

 

 

As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had net operating loss carryforwards of $70.7$37.5 million for U.S. federal tax purposes.  We also had $19.2$4.1 million of various state net operating loss carryforwards.  The loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes will expire between 20192020 and 20362038 if not utilized.  The loss carryforwards for state tax purposes will expire between 20172019 and 20362031 if not utilized.

Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that might be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in stock ownership.  We have performed a Section 382 analysis for the time period from our inception through December 8, 2010. During this time period it was determined thatand we had six separate ownership changes under Section 382. We have not updated the Section 382 analysis subsequent to December 8, 2010; however, we believe there have not been any events subsequent to that date that would materially impact the analysis. We believe that approximately $17.6 million of federal losses will expire unused due to Section 382 limitations.  The maximum annual limitation of federal net operating losses under Section 382 is approximately $990,000.$1.0 million.  This limitation could be further restricted if any ownership changes occur in future years.

Our federal and state net operating losses at December 31, 2016 included $46.2 million and $10.7 million, respectively, of income tax deductions in excess of previously recorded tax benefits. Although these additional tax deductions are included in the net operating losses referenced above, the related tax benefit will not be recognized until the deductions reduce our income taxes payable. The tax benefit of these excess deductions will be reflected as a credit to additional paid in capital when recognized.  Accordingly, our deferred tax assets are reported net of the excess tax deductions for stock compensation and Section 382 limitations.

As of December 31, 20162018 we had federal research and development credit carryforwards, net of Section 383 limitations, of $980,000,$3.0 million, which, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2030.  We had state research and development credit carryforwards of $461,000,$1.0 million which, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2025.

As of December 31, 2016,2018, we had a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets of $649,000.$0.8 million.  The valuation allowance is established for state net operating loss and credit carryforwards that we do not expect to utilize based on our current expectations of future state taxable income.

We are subject to income taxes in thefor U.S. federal and various state and international jurisdictions.  We are generally subject to U.S. federal and state tax examinations for all prior tax years due to our net operating loss carryforwards and the utilization of the carryforwards in years still open under statute.


As of December 31, 2016,2018, we do not have any unrecognized tax benefits.  It is our practice to recognize interest and penalties accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.  We do not expect any material changes in our unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.

NOTE KN – Net Income Per Share

The following table presents the components of the computation of basic and diluted net income per share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  Year Ended December 31, 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

  2016   2015   2014 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Numerator

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

  $5,710    $4,639    $2,704  

 

$

23,872

 

 

$

351

 

 

$

4,963

 

Denominator

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic

   16,947     16,565     16,236  

 

 

17,196

 

 

 

17,183

 

 

 

16,947

 

Options to purchase common stock

   267     437     535  

 

 

306

 

 

 

150

 

 

 

267

 

Restricted stock units

   27     27     42  

 

 

104

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

27

 

Employee stock purchase plan

        3     1  
  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted

   17,241     17,032     16,814  

 

 

17,606

 

 

 

17,356

 

 

 

17,241

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income per share

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

  $0.34    $0.28    $0.17  

 

$

1.39

 

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.29

 

Diluted

  $0.33    $0.27    $0.16  

 

$

1.36

 

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.29

 

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016, 2015,2018, 2017 and 2014,2016, the effect of less than 1,000, approximately 283,000 and approximately 5,000 4,000 and 126,000 outstanding potential common shares, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share becauseas they were anti-dilutive.

NOTE LO – Retirement Savings Plan

We sponsor a 401(k) retirement savings plan for our U.S. employees.  Employees can contribute up to 100% of their compensation, subject to the limits established by law.  WeIn 2018, we increased our match 25%to 50% of the employee’s contribution up to the first 6% ofpre-tax annual compensation. A portion of our match is in company stock, which is purchased from the open market by our plan provider and immediately deposited into the employee’s 401(k) account, which resulted in $1.2 million of stock-based compensation expense in 2018. Additionally, we make statutory contributions to retirement plans

as required by local foreign government regulations.  Our total contributions to the plans, which vest immediately,plan were $1.4$2.9 million, $1.1$1.6 million and $733,000$1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014,2016, respectively.

NOTE MP – Related Party Transactions

SPS Commerce Foundation (the “Foundation”) is a Minnesotanon-profit organization exempt from federal taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.  The Foundation was formed in 2015 to engage in, advance, support, promote and administer charitable activities.  The directors of the Foundation are also our officers.  These officers receive no compensation from the Foundation for the management services performed for the Foundation.  The Foundation is not a subsidiary of ours and the financial results of the Foundation are not consolidated with our financial statements.  We made contributions of $250,000$0.7 million and $500,000$0.2 million to the Foundation for the years ended 2016December 31, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.  We have no current legal obligations for future commitments to the Foundation.


NOTE NQ – Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The following table presents our selected unaudited quarterly statements of comprehensive income data (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

 

  For the Three Months Ended 

2016

  Mar 31   Jun 30   Sep 30   Dec 31 

2018

 

Mar 31

 

 

Jun 30

 

 

Sep 30

 

 

Dec 31

 

Revenues

  $45,599    $47,351    $49,284    $51,061  

 

$

59,092

 

 

$

61,091

 

 

$

62,868

 

 

$

65,189

 

Gross profit

   30,718     31,379     33,113     33,739  

 

 

39,334

 

 

 

40,689

 

 

 

42,457

 

 

 

44,012

 

Income from operations

   1,314     880     2,670     2,653  

 

 

4,300

 

 

 

5,965

 

 

 

8,257

 

 

 

8,209

 

Net income

   1,044     352     2,509    $1,805  

 

 

3,254

 

 

 

5,416

 

 

 

8,061

 

 

 

7,141

 

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.06    $0.02    $0.14    $0.10  

 

$

0.19

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

$

0.45

 

 

$

0.40

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

 

  For the Three Months Ended 

2015

  Mar 31   Jun 30   Sep 30   Dec 31 

2017

 

Mar 31

 

 

Jun 30

 

 

Sep 30

 

 

Dec 31

 

Revenues

  $36,970    $38,846    $40,354    $42,348  

 

$

51,879

 

 

$

54,092

 

 

$

56,057

 

 

$

58,057

 

Gross profit

   25,398     26,511     27,654     28,912  

 

 

34,549

 

��

 

35,901

 

 

 

37,412

 

 

 

38,598

 

Income from operations

   922     1,027     2,260     2,814  

 

 

3,379

 

 

 

2,956

 

 

 

3,354

 

 

 

292

 

Net income

   586     651     1,270     2,132  

Net income (loss)

 

 

2,985

 

 

 

1,968

 

 

 

2,176

 

 

 

(6,778

)

Diluted earnings per share

  $0.03    $0.04    $0.07    $0.12  

 

$

0.17

 

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

0.13

 

 

$

(0.39

)


Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With AccountantsAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016,2018, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.  This evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”).  Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), such as this Annual Report onForm 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).SEC.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed such that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that as of December 31, 2016,2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  Internal control over financial reporting is defined inRules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principlesGAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive and financial officers, we assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2018, based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)(“COSO”).

Based on this assessment, management concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162018 based on the specified criteria.

In the firstfourth quarter of 2016,2018, we acquired all outstanding common stockthe assets of Toolbox Solutions, Inc. (“Toolbox Solutions”). Toolbox Solutionstwo separate entities, EDIAdmin and CovalentWorks. EDIAdmin and CovalentWorks represented approximately fourtwo percent and six percent of our total consolidated assets, respectively.  EDIAdmin and four

CovalentWorks each represented less than one percent of our consolidated revenues as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. As the acquisitionthese acquisitions occurred in 2016,2018, the scope of our assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting does not include Toolbox Solutions.EDIAdmin and CovalentWorks. This exclusion is in accordance with the SEC’s general guidance that an assessment of a recently acquired business may be omitted from the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the year of acquisition.


The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20162018 has been audited by KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included under Item 8 of this Annual Report onForm 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter ended December 31, 20162018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We acquired Toolbox Solutions on January 5, 2016, and as part of the ongoing integration activities, we will complete an assessment of existing controls and incorporate our controls and procedures into the acquired operations, as appropriate.

Item 9B.

Other Information

None.


PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item with respect to executive officers is contained in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form10-K under the heading “Executive Officers” and with respect to other information relating to our directors and executive officers will be set forth in our 2017the 2019 Proxy Statement under the caption “Item 1 Election of Directors,” which will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form10-K, and is incorporated herein by reference.

The information required by this item under Item 405 of RegulationS-K is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” of our 2017the 2019 Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.Statement.  

The information required by this item under Item 407(d)(4) and (d)(5) of RegulationS-K is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance — Governance—Board Committees — Audit Committee” of our 2017 Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after the endCommittees” of the fiscal year covered2019 Proxy Statement.

The information required by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.item under Item 407(c)(3) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Procedures for Selecting and Nominating Director Candidates” of the 2019 Proxy Statement.

We have adopted a code of business conduct applicable to our directors, officers (including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) and employees.  The Code of Conduct is available on our website atwww.spscommerce.com under the Investor Relations section.  We plan to post on our website at the address described above any future amendments or waivers of our Code of Conduct.

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections titled “Executive Compensation,” “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Director Compensation” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Transactions—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” of our 2017the 2019 Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form10-K.Statement.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and RelatedStockholder Matters

The information related to security ownership required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled “Security Ownership” of our 2017the 2019 Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.Statement.

The information related to our equity compensation plans required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled “Executive Compensation — Outstanding Equity Awards” of our 2017 Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections titled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” and “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Director Independence” of our 2017 Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after the endIndependence of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report onForm 10-K.2019 Proxy Statement.

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled “Audit Committee Report and Payment of Fees to Our Independent Auditor” of our 2017the 2019 Proxy Statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on FormStatement.


10-K.PART

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form10-K:

(a)  Financial Statements: The financial statements filed as a part of this report are listed in Part II, Item 8.

(b)  Financial Statement Schedules: The schedules are either not applicable or the required information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(c)  Exhibits: The exhibits incorporated by reference or filed as a part of this Annual Report onForm 10-K are listed in the Exhibit Index immediately followingprior to the signatures to this report.

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

None.


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

Incorporated By Reference

 

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File

Number

 

Date of

First

Filing

 

Exhibit Number

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  3.1

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

 

S-3

 

333-182097

 

06/13/2012

 

4.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

10/17/2017

 

3.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

2001 Stock Option Plan**

 

S-1/A

 

333-163476

 

01/11/2010

 

10.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

 

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 2001 Stock Option Plan**

 

S-1/A

 

333-163476

 

01/11/2010

 

10.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.3

 

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement (Director) under 2001 Stock Option Plan**

 

S-1/A

 

333-163476

 

01/11/2010

 

10.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.4

 

2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended effective October 29, 2014**

 

10-K

 

001-34702

 

02/20/2015

 

10.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.5

 

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

02/17/2012

 

10.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.6

 

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement (Employee) under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

02/17/2012

 

10.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.7

 

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement (Director) under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

02/17/2012

 

10.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.8

 

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

02/15/2017

 

99.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.9

 

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**

 

10-Q

 

001-34702

 

05/08/2012

 

10.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.10

 

Form of Performance Stock Unit Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

02/18/2018

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.11

 

Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy**

 

10-Q

 

001-34702

 

07/27/2018

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.12

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement for Independent Directors

 

S-1/A

 

333-163476

 

01/11/2010

 

10.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.13

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement for Archie C. Black**

 

S-1/A

 

333-163476

 

01/11/2010

 

10.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.14

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and Archie C. Black**

 

S-1/A

 

333-163476

 

03/05/2010

 

10.20

 

 


 

 

 

 

Incorporated By Reference

 

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

File

Number

 

Date of

First

Filing

 

Exhibit Number

 

Filed Herewith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.15

 

Form of Executive Severance and Change in Control Agreement**

 

S-K

 

001-34702

 

02/03/2016

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.16

 

Standard Form Office Lease, dated as of February 14, 2012, by and between the registrant and CSDV-MN Limited Partnership

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

02/17/2012

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.17

 

Management Incentive Plan**

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

02/03/2016

 

10.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.18

 

Executive Severance and Change in Control Agreement**

 

8-K

 

001-34702

 

11/17/2017

 

10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of the registrant

 

10-K

 

001-34702

 

02/22/2019

 

21.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of KPMG LLP

 

10-K

 

001-34702

 

02/22/2019

 

23.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24.1

 

Power of Attorney (included on signature page)

 

10-K

 

001-34702

 

02/22/2019

 

24.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101

 

Interactive Data Files Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

Item 16.

**

Form10-K Summary

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


None.

SIGNATURESSIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: February 27, 2017March 15, 2019

SPS COMMERCE, INC.

By:

By:

/s/ ARCHIE C. BLACK

Archie C. Black

President and Chief Executive Officer

Each of the undersigned hereby appoints Archie C. Black and Kimberly K. Nelson, and each of them (with full power to act alone), as attorneys and agents for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, any and all amendments and exhibits to this annual report onForm 10-K and any and all applications, instruments, and other documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to this annual report onForm 10-K or any amendments thereto, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever requisite and necessary or desirable.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 27, 2017.March 15, 2019.

 

Name and Signature

Title

Name and Signature

Title

/s/ ARCHIE C. BLACK

Archie C. Black

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (principal

Archie C. Black

(principal executive officer)

/s/ KIMBERLY K. NELSON

Kimberly K. Nelson

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal

Kimberly K. Nelson

(principal financial and accounting officer)

/s/    MARTIN J. LEESTMA 

*

Director

Melvin L. Keating

*

Director

Martin J. Leestma

Director

/s/    JAMES B. RAMSEY 

*

Director

Michael J. McConnell

*

Director

James B. Ramsey

Director

/s/    TAMI L. RELLER 

*

Director

Marty M. Réaume

*

Director

Tami L. Reller

Director

/s/    MICHAEL A. SMERKLO        

Michael A. Smerklo

Director

/s/    PHILIP E. SORAN        *

Director

Philip E. Soran

Director

/s/    SVEN A. WEHRWEIN 

*

Director

Sven A. Wehrwein

Director

*/s/ KIMBERLY K. NELSON

  Kimberly K. Nelson, by Power of Attorney

EXHIBIT INDEX

      Incorporated By Reference    

Exhibit

Number

  

Exhibit Description

  

Form

  

File Number

   

Date of

First

Filing

   

Exhibit
Number

  

Filed
Herewith

 
3.1  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation  S-3   333-182097     06/13/2012    4.1  
3.2  Amended and Restated Bylaws  S-1/A   333-163476     03/05/2010    3.2  
10.1  2001 Stock Option Plan**  S-1/A   333-163476     01/11/2010    10.3  
10.2  Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 2001 Stock Option Plan**  S-1/A   333-163476     01/11/2010    10.4  
10.3  Form ofNon-Statutory Stock Option Agreement (Director) under 2001 Stock Option Plan**  S-1/A   333-163476     01/11/2010    10.5  
10.4  2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended effective October 29, 2014**  10-K   001-34702     02/20/2015    10.6  
10.5  Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**  8-K   001-34702     02/17/2012    10.2  
10.6  Form ofNon-Statutory Stock Option Agreement (Employee) under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**  8-K   001-34702     02/17/2012    10.3  
10.7  Form ofNon-Statutory Stock Option Agreement (Director) under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**  8-K   001-34702     02/17/2012    10.4  
10.8  Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**  8-K   001-34702     02/17/2012    99.2  
10.9  Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**  10-Q   001-34702     05/08/2012    10.6  
10.10  Form of Performance Stock Unit Agreement under 2010 Equity Incentive Plan**  8-K   001-34702     02/15/2017    99.1  
10.11  Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy**           X  
10.12  Form of Indemnification Agreement for Independent Directors  S-1/A   333-163476     01/11/2010    10.18  
10.13  Form of Indemnification Agreement for Archie C. Black**  S-1/A   333-163476     01/11/2010    10.19  
10.14  Employment Agreement between the Company and Archie C. Black**  S-1/A   333-163476     03/05/2010    10.20  
10.15  Form of Executive Severance and Change in Control Agreement**  S-K   001-34702     02/03/2016    10.1  
10.16  Standard Form Office Lease, dated as of February 14, 2012, by and between the registrant andCSDV-MN Limited Partnership  8-K   001-34702     02/17/2012    10.1  

      Incorporated By Reference    

Exhibit

Number

  

Exhibit Description

  

Form

  

File Number

   

Date of

First

Filing

   

Exhibit
Number

  

Filed
Herewith

 
10.17  Management Incentive Plan**  8-K   001-34702     02/03/2016    10.2  
21.1  Subsidiaries of the registrant           X  
23.1  Consent of KPMG LLP           X  
24.1  Power of Attorney (included on signature page)           X  
31.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rules13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended           X  
31.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended           X  
32.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002           X  
101  Interactive Data Files Pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T           X  

**Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

7983