Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

________________________



Form 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 27, 201730, 2020

OR

 

☐ 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto

Commission FileNumber: 0-32113



Commission File Number: 0-32113

________________________

 

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

________________________





Delaware

Delaware

33-0832424

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

17101 Armstrong Avenue, Irvine, California 92614

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(714) 430-6400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

RGP

The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market LLC

(Nasdaq (Nasdaq Global Select Market)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None (Title of Class)

________________________



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes   ☐     No   ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes   ☐     No   ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   ☒     No   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   ☒     No   ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an “emergingemerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”  “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer  

Accelerated filer  

Non-accelerated filer    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company  

Emerging growth company  

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes   ☐     No   ☒

As of November 25, 201622, 2019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the approximate aggregate market value of common stock held bynon-affiliates of the registrant was $456,774,000$457,496,000 (based upon the closing price for shares of the registrant’s common stock as reported by The Nasdaq Global Select Market). As of July 17, 2017,8, 2020, there were approximately 29,867,91932,144,373 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.



________________________



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-K to the extent stated herein.


RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.




RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



1


In this Annual Report onForm 10-K, “Resources,” “Resources Connection,” “Resources Global Professionals,” “RGP,” “Resources Global,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the business of Resources Connection, Inc. and its subsidiaries. References in this Annual Report onForm 10-K to “fiscal,” “year” or “fiscal year” refer to our fiscal year that consists of the52- or53-week period ending on the Saturday in May closest to May 31. The fiscal year ended May 30, 2020 consisted of 53 weeks. The fiscal years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 30, 201526, 2018 consisted of 52 weeks.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report onForm 10-K, including information incorporated herein by reference, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. For example, statements discussing, among other things, expected savings, business strategies, growth strategies and initiatives, acquisition strategies, future revenues and future performance, are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should” or “will” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

Our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements and those of our industry may be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

These statements and all phases of our operations are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements and those of our industry to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The disclosures we make concerning risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect our business or operating results, including those madeidentified in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report onForm 10-K, as well as our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). should be reviewed carefully. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business or operating results. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update the forward-looking statements in this filing to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

events, unless required by law to do so.

2


PART I

 

ITEM 1.BUSINESS.

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS.

Overview

Resources Connection

RGP is a multinationalglobal consulting firm; its operating entities provide services primarily underfirm that enables rapid business outcomes by bringing together the name Resources Global Professionals (“RGP” orright people to create transformative change. As a human capital partner for our clients, we specialize in solving today’s most pressing business problems across the “Company”). The Company provides agile consulting services to its global client base which are faced with disruption and business transformation issues. We bring functional competenciesenterprise in the areas of accounting; finance; governance, risktransactions, regulations, and compliance management; corporate advisory, strategic communicationstransformations. Our engagements are designed to leverage human connection and restructuring; information management; human capital; supply chain management;collaboration to deliver practical solutions and legal and regulatory.

We assistmore impactful results that power our clients, by providing “intellectualconsultants and partners’ success.

RGP was founded in 1996 to help finance executives with operational needs and special projects. Headquartered in Irvine, California, RGP is proud to have served 88 of the Fortune 100 as of July 2020. Our agile human capital on demand”model quickly aligns the right resources for the work at hand with speed and efficiency. Our pioneering approach to workforce strategy uniquely positions us to support transformation and optimization projects requiring specialized expertise or capacity in areas such as:

Finance and accounting process transformation and optimization; financial reporting and analysis; technical and operational accounting; merger and acquisition due diligence and integration; audit readiness, preparation and response; implementation of new accounting standards such as the revenue recognition pronouncement and lease accounting standard; and remediation support

Information management services including program and project management; business and technology integration; data strategy including governance, security and privacy (such as the European General Data Protection Regulation); and business performance management (such as core planning and consolidation systems)

Corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring services

Corporate governance, risk and compliance management services including contract and regulatory compliance efforts under, for example, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes”); Enterprise Risk Management; internal controls management; and operation and information technology (“IT”) audits

Supply chain management services including strategy development; procurement and supplier management; logistics and materials management; supply chain planning and forecasting; and Unique Device Identification compliance

Human capital services including change management; organization development and effectiveness; compensation and incentive plan strategies and design and optimization of human resources technology and operations

Legal and regulatory services supporting commercial transactions; global compliance initiatives; law department operations; and law department business strategy and analytics

We were founded in June 1996 by a team at Deloitte LLP (“Deloitte”), led by our chairman, Donald B. Murray, who was then a senior partner with Deloitte. Our founders created the Company to capitalize on the increasing demand for high quality outsourced professional services. We operated as a part of Deloitte until April 1999. In April 1999, we completed amanagement-led buyout. In December 2000, we completed our initial public offering of common stock and began trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market. We currently trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. We operate under the acronym RGP, the branding for our operating entity name of Resources Global Professionals.

Our business model combines the client service orientation and commitment to quality from our legacy as part of a Big Four accounting firm with the entrepreneurial culture of an innovative, agile and dynamic company. We are positioned to take advantage of what we believe are two continuing trends in the marketplace: constant change driving the need for agile, specialized talent in our global client base and a growing innovative talent pool interested in working in anon-traditional professional environment. We believe our business model allows us to simultaneously offer challenging yet flexible career opportunities to attract well qualified, experienced professionals and to attract clients with enterprise-wide, global consulting needs.

As of May 27, 2017, we employed or contracted with 2,569 consultants serving a diverse base of over 1,800 clients ranging from large multinational corporations tomid-sized companies to small entrepreneurial entities, in a broad range of industries. Our

consultants have professional experience in a wide range of industries and functional areas and most have advanced professional degrees or designations. We offer our consultants careers that combine the flexibility of project-based consulting work with many of the advantages of working for a traditional professional services firm.

Our offices serve our multinational clients throughout the world with a client focus rather than from just a regional/office perspective. To enhance our ability to serve multinational clients, we served our clients from 43 offices inon their transformation journeys. With more than 3,400 professionals, we annually engage with over 2,400 clients around the United States and from 24 offices within 21 countries abroad as of May 27, 2017.

Revenue from the Company’s major geographic areas was as follows (in thousands):world.



   Revenue for the
For the Years Ended
      % of Total 
   May 27,
        2017        
   May 28,
        2016        
   %
Change
  May 27,
2017
  May 28,
2016
 

North America

  $479,263   $499,229    (4.0)%   82.1  83.4

Europe

   60,461    57,714    4.8  10.4   9.6 

Asia Pacific

   43,687    41,578    5.1  7.5   7.0 
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $583,411   $598,521    (2.5)%   100.0  100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

See Note 14 —Segment Information and Enterprise Reporting — to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the Company’s domestic and international operations and Part I Item 1A, “Risk Factors — Our ability to serve clients internationally is integral to our strategy and our international activities expose us to additional operational challenges that we might not otherwise face” for information regarding the risks attendant to our international operations.

We believe our distinctive culture is a valuable asset and is, in large part, due to our management team, which has extensive experience in the professional services industry. Most of our senior management and office managing directors have Big Four, management consulting and/or Fortune 500 experience and an equity interest in the Company. This team has created a culture of professionalism and a client service orientation that we believe fosters in our consultants a feeling of personal responsibility for, and pride in, client projects and enables us to deliver high-quality service and results to our clients.

Industry Background and Trends

Changing Market for Project- or Initiative-Based Professional Services

RGP’s services respond to a growing marketplace trend: namely, corporate clients are increasingly choosing to plan foraddress their workforce needs in more agileflexible ways. We believe this growing shift in workforce strategy towards a project-based orientation might also be accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic with an enhanced emphasis on business agility. Permanent headcount isprofessional personnel positions are being reduced as clients purposely engage agile talent for project initiatives and transformation work.

While the market for professional services is broad and fragmented and independent data on the size of the market is not readily available, we believe companies may be more willing to choose alternatives to permanent headcount and traditional professional service providers because of evolving economic competitive pressure and significant increases ingovernment-led regulatory requirements, such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. We believe RGP is positioned as a viable alternative to traditional accounting, consulting and law firms in numerous instances because, by using project consultants, companies can:

Strategically access specialized skills, expertise for projects of set duration

Effectively supplement internal resources

Increase labor flexibility

Reduce their overall hiring, training and termination costs

Typically, companiesCompanies use a varietymix of alternativesalternative resources to fillexecute on projects. Some companies rely solely on their project needs. Companiesown employees who may lack the requisite time, experience or skills for specific projects. They may outsource entire projects to consulting firms, which provides them access to the expertise of the firm but often entails significant cost and less management control of the

project. Companies also supplement their internal resources with employees from the Big Four accounting firms or other traditional professional services firms. CompaniesAs a more cost-efficient alternative, companies sometimes use temporary employees from traditional and Internet-based staffing firms, although these employees may be less experienced or less qualified than employees from professional services firms. Finally, some companies rely solely oncan supplement their owninternal resources with employees who may lack the requisite time, experiencefrom agile consulting or skills.other traditional professional services firms, like RGP. The use of project consultants as a viable alternative to traditional accounting, consulting and law firms allows companies to:

·Strategically access specialized skills and expertise for projects of set duration

·Access the very best talent across regions and geographies 

·Be nimble and mobilize quickly

·Blend independent and fresh points of view

·Effectively supplement internal resources

·Increase labor flexibility

·Reduce overall hiring, training and termination costs

Supply of Project Consultants

Based on discussions with our consultants, we believe the number of professionals seeking to work on an agile basis has historically increasedbeen increasing due to a desire for:

 

More flexible hours and work arrangements, coupled with a

·More flexible hours and work arrangements, including working from home options, coupled with an evolving professional culture that offers competitive wages and benefits

Challenging engagements that advance their careers, develop their skills and add to their experience base

·The ability to learn and contribute in different environments and collaborate with diverse team members

A work environment that provides a diversity of, and more control over, client

·Challenging engagements that advance their careers, develop their skills and add to their experience base

·A work environment that provides a diversity of, and more control over, client engagements

·Alternate employment opportunities in regions throughout the world

3


The employment alternatives available to professionals may fulfill some, but not all, of an individual’s career objectives. A professional working for a Big Four firm or a consulting firm may receive challenging assignments and training, buttraining; however, he or she may encounter a career path with less choice and less flexible hours, extensive travel and limited control over work engagements. Alternatively, a professional who works as an independent contractor faces the ongoing task of sourcing assignments and significant administrative burdens.burdens, including potential tax and legal issues.

Resources Global Professionals’

RGP’s Solution

We believe RGP is ideally positioned to capitalize on the confluence of the industry trendsshifts described above. We believe, based on discussions with our clients, that RGP provides the agility that companies desire in today’s highly competitive and quickly evolving business environment. We are able to combine all ofOur solution offers the following:following elements:

 

A relationship-oriented and collaborative approach with our clients

·A relationship-oriented and collaborative approach to client service

·A professional dedicated talent acquisition and management team adept at developing, managing and deploying a project-based workforce

·Deep functional and/or technical experts who can assess clients’ project needs and customize solutions to meet those needs

·Highly qualified and pedigreed consultants with the requisite expertise, experience and points of view

·Competitive rates on an hourly, rather than project, basis

·Significant client control of their projects with effective knowledge transfer and change management



Client service teams with Big Four, consulting and/or industry backgrounds to assess our clients’ project needs and customize solutions to meet those needs

RGP’s Strategic Priorities



Highly qualified consultants with the requisite expertise, experience and points of view

Competitive rates on an hourly, rather than project, basis

Significant client control of their projects with effective knowledge transfer and change management

Resources Global Professionals’ Strategy

Our Business Strategy

We are dedicated to serving our clients with highly qualified and experienced talent in support of projects and initiatives in a broad array of functional areas, including accounting; finance; corporate governance, risk and compliance management; corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring; information management; human capital; supply chain management; and legal and regulatory. including:

Transactions

     Integration and divestitures

     Bankruptcy/restructuring

     IPO readiness and support

     Financial process optimization

     System implementation

Regulations

     Accounting regulations

     Internal audit and compliance

     Data privacy and security

     Healthcare compliance

     Regulatory compliance

Transformations

     Finance transformation

     Digital transformation

     Supply chain management

     Cloud migration

     Data design and analytics

Our objective is to bebuild RGP’s reputation as the leadingpremier provider of agile consulting serviceshuman capital solutions for companies facing transformation, change and compliance challenges. We have developed the following business strategies to achieve our objectives:

 

·Hire and retain highly qualified, experienced consultants. We believe our highly qualified, experienced consultants provide us with a distinct competitive advantage. Therefore, one of our priorities is to continue to attract and retain high-caliber consultants.consultants who are committed to serving clients and solving their problems. We believe we have been successful in attracting and retaining qualified professionals by providing challenging work assignments, competitive compensation and benefits, and continuing educationprofessional development and traininglearning opportunities as well as membership to an exclusive community of likeminded professionals, while offering flexible work schedules and more control over choosing client engagements.

Maintain our distinctive culture.Our corporate culture is the foundation of our business strategy and we believe it has been a significant component of our success. Our senior management, virtually all of whom are Big Four or other professional services firm alumni, has created a culture that combines the commitment to quality and the client service focus of a Big Four firm with the entrepreneurial energy of an innovative, high-growth company. We seek consultants and management with talent, integrity, enthusiasm and loyalty (“TIEL”, an acronym used frequently within the Company) to strengthen our team and support our ability to provide clients with high-quality services and solutions. We believe our culture has been instrumental to our success in hiring and retaining highly qualified employees and, in turn, attracting quality clients.

·Maintain our distinctive culture.  Our corporate culture is the foundation of our business strategy and we believe it has been a significant component of our success. Our senior management team, the majority of whom are Big Four, management consulting and/or Fortune 500 alumni, has created a culture that combines the commitment to quality and client service focus of a Big Four firm with the entrepreneurial energy of an innovative, high-growth company. We believe our shared values, embodied in “LIFE AT RGP”, representing Loyalty, Integrity, Focus, Enthusiasm, Accountability and Talent, has created a circle of quality. Our Power of Human

4

 


(pH) Competencies also bring the opportunity to help our people develop new mindsets, behaviors and actions that not only allow them to be successful in their current roles, but also empower them to take on new opportunities and challenges. Our culture is instrumental to our success in hiring and retaining highly qualified employees who, in turn, attract quality clients.

·Build consultative relationships with clients.  We emphasize a relationship-oriented approach to business rather than a transaction-oriented or assignment-oriented approach. We believe the professional services experience of our management and consultants enables us to understand the needs of our clients and to deliver an integrated, relationship-orientedrelationship-based approach to meeting their professional services requirements. Wethose needs. Client relationships and needs are addressed from a client, not geographic, perspective. Our revenue team regularly meetmeets with our existing and prospective clients to understand their business issues and help them define their project needs. Once an initiative is defined, we identifyOur talent team then identifies consultants with the appropriate skills and experience to meet the client’s objectives. We believe that by establishing relationships with our clients to solve their professional servicesservice needs, we are more likely to generateidentify new opportunities to serve them. The strength and depth of our client relationships is demonstrated by two key statistics: 1) during fiscal 2017, 49 of our 50 largest clients used more than one practice area and 40 of those top 50 clients used three or more practice areas; and 2) 45 of our largest 50 clients in fiscal 2012 remained clients in fiscal 2017 while 37the approximately 80% retention rate of our top 50100 clients in 2008 were still clients in 2017. In addition, during fiscal 2017 our top 50 clients were served by an average of six RGP offices, demonstratingover the breadth of our relationships with clients world-wide.last five years.

·Build the RGP brand.  Our objective is to build RGP’s reputation in the marketplace as the premier provider of agile consulting serviceshuman capital solutions for companies facing transformation, change and compliance challenges. We want to be the preferred provider in the future of work. Our primary means of building our brand is by consistently providingcontinues to be the consistent and reliable delivery of high-quality, value-added services to our clients. We have also focused on buildingbuilt a significant referral network through our 2,5692,495 consultants and 732938 management and administrative employees working from offices in 21 countries as of May 27, 2017.30, 2020. In addition, we have invested in global, regional and local marketing and brand activation efforts that reinforce the RGP brand.

Our Growth Strategy

Since inception, our growth has been primarily organic rather than via acquisition.with certain strategic acquisitions along the way that supplemented our physical presence or solution offerings. We believe we have significant opportunity for continued organic growth in our core business and also to grow opportunistically through strategic and highly targeted acquisitions as the global economy strengthens and economic uncertainties decrease and, in addition that we can grow opportunistically through strategic acquisitions.starts to recover. In both our core and acquired businesses, key elements of our growth strategy include:

 

Expanding work from

·Increased penetration of existing clients.client base.  A principal component of our strategy is to secure additional work from the clients we have served. We believe, based on discussions with our clients, the amount of revenue we currently receivegenerate from many of our clients represents a relatively small percentage of the total amount they spend on professional services, and, consistentservices. Consistent with historiccurrent industry trends, theywe believe our clients may also continue to increase the amount theythat spend on these services as the global economy recovers and evolves. We believe that by continuing to deliver high-quality services and by further developing our relationships with our clients, we can capture a significantly larger share of our clients’ expenditures for professional services.services budgets. Near the end of fiscal 2017, we launched our Strategic Client Program to serve a number of our largest clients with dedicated global account teams. We believe this focus enhances our opportunities to develop in-depth knowledge of these clients’ needs and the ability to increase the scope and size of projects with those clients.

·Growing our client base.  We will continue to focus on attracting new clients. We strive to develop new client relationships primarily by leveraging the significant contact networks of our management and consultants and through referrals from existing clients. We believe we can continue to attract new clients by building our brand nameidentity and reputation, supplemented by our global, regional and local marketing efforts. We anticipate our growth efforts this year will focus on identifying strategic target accounts especially in the large and middle market client segments.

Expanding geographically. We have expanded geographically to meet the demand for agile professional services around the world and currently have offices in 21 countries. We believe, based upon our clients’ requests, there are future opportunities to promote growth globally. Consequently, we intend to continue to expand our international presence on a

strategic·Strategic acquisitions.  Our acquisition strategy is to engage in targeted M&A efforts that are designed to enhance our digital transformation and opportunistic basis. We maytechnology consulting capabilities. In fiscal 2018, we acquired taskforce, Management on Demand AG (“taskforce”) and substantially all of the assets and assumption of certain liabilities of Accretive Solutions, Inc. (“Accretive”). The acquisitions of taskforce and Accretive satisfied the need to better penetrate the vibrant economic market in Germany and gaps in serving middle market companies in the United States, respectively, while also addharmonizing well with RGP’s culture. In fiscal 2020, we acquired Veracity Consulting Group, LLC (“Veracity”) and Expertforce Interim GmbH, LLC (“Expertence”). The acquisition of Veracity accelerated our stated object to enhance our existing domestic office network whendigital capabilities and our existing clients haveability to offer comprehensive digital innovation services. With the acquisition of Expertence, we are able to offer a need or if there is a significant new client opportunity.full range of project and management consulting services in the German market.

·Providing additional professional service offerings.  We will continue to develop and consider entry into new professional service offerings. Since our founding, we have diversified our professional service offerings from a primary focus on accounting and finance to other areas in which our clients have significant needs such as human capital; information management; governance, riskintegration and compliance; supply chain management; legal and regulatory services; and corporate advisory, strategic communicationsdivestitures, bankruptcy and restructuring, services.financial process optimization, accounting regulations, internal audit and compliance, healthcare compliance, finance transformation, digital transformation, and data design and analytics.  In fiscal 2017, we formed our Integrated SolutionsAdvisory and Project Services group (formerly known as “Integrated Solutions”) to identify project opportunities that we can market at an enterprisea broader level with our talent, tools and methodologies. This group commercializes projects into solution offerings. Currently, our solutions practice is focused on M&A Integration Services, Data Solutionsfinance transformation, digital transformation, data design and Technical Accounting Services. Our considerations whenanalytics, and system implementation. When evaluating new solutions offerings includeto market to current and prospective clients, we consider (among other things) cultural fit, growth potential, profitability, cross-marketing opportunities and competition.

5


COVID-19 Impact

Starting in January 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 (the “Pandemic”) has severely impacted the global economic climate, creating significant challenges and uncertainty in the operations of organizations around the world. We are closely monitoring the impact of the Pandemic on all aspects of our business, including how it impacts our employees and client engagements. While the extent to which our operations may be impacted by the Pandemic is still uncertain and depends largely on future developments, we believe the Pandemic adversely impacted our operating results in the second half of fiscal 2020 and expect the impact is going to continue into fiscal 2021. As further described in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below, we initiated our strategic business review in North America and Asia Pacific ahead of the Pandemic, and carried out a reduction in force in early March. We have substantially completed the restructuring initiatives in these markets in fiscal 2020. We believe these actions have enabled us to operate with greater agility as we seek to ensure our organizational health and resilience, and weather the challenges associated with the Pandemic.

Consultants

We believe an important component of our success has been our highly qualified and experienced consultants.consultant base. As of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, we employed or contracted with 2,5692,495 consultants engaged with clients. Our consultants have professional experience in a wide range of industries and functional areas. We provide our consultants with challenging work assignments, competitive compensation and benefits, and continuing educationprofessional development and traininglearning opportunities, while offering more choice concerning work schedules and more control over choosing client engagements.

Almost all of our consultants in the United States are employees of RGP. We typically pay each consultant an hourly rate for each consulting hour worked and for certain administrative time and overtime premiums, and offer benefits, including: paid time off and holidays; a discretionary bonus program; group medical and dental programs, each with an approximate30-50% contribution by the consultant; a basic term life insurance program; a 401(k) retirement plan with a discretionary company match; and professional development and career training. Typically, a consultant must work a threshold number of hours to be eligible for all of these benefits. In addition, we offer our consultants the ability to participate in the Company’sour Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which enables them to purchase shares of the Company’sour stock at a discount. We intend to maintain competitive compensation and benefit programs. To a much lesser extent, we utilize a “bench model” for consultants with specialized in-demand skills and experience in our Advisory and Project Services group. These consultants are paid a weekly salary rather than for each consulting hour worked and have bonus eligibility based upon utilization.

Internationally, our consultants are a blend of employees and independent contractors. Independent contractor arrangements are more common abroad than in the United States due to the labor laws, tax regulations and customs of the international markets we serve. A few international practices also partially utilize a partialthe “bench model”; that is, certain consultants are paid a weekly salary rather than for each consulting hour worked with bonus eligibility based upon utilization. described above.

Clients

We provide our services and solutions to a diverse client base in a broad range of industries. In fiscal 2017,2020, we served over 1,8002,400 clients from offices located in 2137 countries. Our revenues are not concentrated with any particular client or within any particular industry.client. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue for the years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015, and in2020, 2019 or 2018 fiscal 2017,years. In fiscal 2020, our 10 largest clients accounted for approximately 15%16% of our revenues.

The clients listed below represent the multinational and industry diversity of our client base:

Operations



Aetna Inc.IBM Bluemix Infrastructure (SoftLayer)
AIGKaiser Permanente
American Express CompanyMetLife, Inc.
BASF CorporationMorgan Stanley
Bayer CorporationPhilips Lighting
Caesars Entertainment CorporationPhillips 66 Company
Calumet Specialty Products PartnersSyngenta International AG
Chevron CorporationTesco
CIT Group Inc.Unilever
Citigroup

Services and Products

RGP’s business model and operating philosophy are rooted in the support ofclient-led projects and consulting initiatives, extending to advisory-based services that leverage the deep experience and expertise of our internal team while partnering with our clients’ business leaders. Often, we deliver our services to clients across multiple functional areas of expertise with consultants from several disciplines working on the same project. Our areas of core competency include: finance and accounting; information management; human capital; corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring services; legal and regulatory; governance, risk and compliance; and supply chain management.

Finance & Accounting

RGP’s Finance and Accounting services encompass accounting operations, financial reporting, internal controls, financial analyses and business transactions. Clients utilize our services to bring accomplished talent to bear on internally driven change initiatives, such as M&A activities, or externally mandated change, such as required implementations of new accounting standards, as well asday-to-day operational issues. We provide specialized skills and then transfer knowledge to clients in order to help them leverage their own personnel. RGP specializes in providing customized solutions to our clients’ most pressing business problems, through project management and providing access to full project teams for a specific initiative. Our scalability and global reach also put us in the ideal position to help organizations manage peak workload periods or add specific skill sets to ongoing client projects.

Our Finance and Accounting core competencies include:

Process Transformation and Optimization

•    Business process improvement

•    Treasury operations

•    Skills development and training

Remediation and Audit Response Support

•    Internal control weakness remediation

•    Financial statement restatements

•    Audit response

Financial Reporting and Analysis

•    External financial reporting

•    Internal management reporting

•    Key performance indicators

•    Planning, budgeting and modeling

•    Account and transaction-level analysis

Transactional Support

•    Mergers and acquisitions

•    IPOs

•    Bankruptcies

•    Divestitures

Technical and Operational Accounting

•    Policies and procedures

•    New accounting standards implementation

Sample Engagement — Cross-practice area M&A Joint Venture Assessment and Integration Execution: A large U.S. based manufacturing company engaged RGP to execute a 50/50 joint venture with another manufacturer. Using RGP’s proprietary M&A integration framework, our team of 22 consultants helped the client through integration planning, execution and transformation. RGP set up the Integration Management Office (“IMO”) to provide the client with program and project management, change management, synergy management, and reporting/metrics. Functioning as an extension of the company,

RGP’s team provided the following services, which serve as a rigorous example of its cross-discipline functionality between our practice areas:

Supported the integration execution across all functional areas of the company, including:

IT — Integration Lead, Applications, Infrastructure

Finance — Integration Lead, Analysts, Systems

Supply Chain — Integration Lead, Plant Optimization, Freight, Procurement

HR — Integration Lead, Change Management, Communications, Systems

Engagement Lead, IMO Lead, Program Manager, Synergies

Led both companies through successful cross-function planning , laying the foundation for creation of the integration plan. Instead of two disparate companies giving input, both groups began to think as one company

Developed operating plans andgo-to market strategy for the combined entity and a roadmap to coordinate major activities for all team work streams, established dependencies for critical project activities and created a mechanism for detailed tracking

Led joint venture integration milestones, including:

Announcement of new company name and organization

Roll out of employee benefits

Human resources and enterprise reporting go live

Combined financial reporting

Integrated branding

Sample Engagement — Revenue Recognition Assessment and Solution:RGP led the execution and solution design for a U.S. based provider of global customer-experience technology in order to comply with the requirements of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) revenue recognition guidance,Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customersand subsequently issued amendments (Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606). RGP led the client’s ASC 606 assessment by gathering data, analyzing contracts, identifying issues and documenting accounting conclusions. Subsequently, RGP led the effort to align stakeholders, define future-state processes to address gaps and develop the application and data roadmap.

RGP’s efforts consisted of two phases: Phase 1 — Impact Assessment and Phase 2 — Solution Design. Our consultants’ activities included:

Project managing the initiative, including developing the project plan, establishing project governance, identifying key stakeholders and providing training to facilitate appropriate client employee engagement

Cataloging of collected data to obtain a comprehensive view of revenue streams, contract data and other critical elements across the company, including identifying contract populations and determining grouping strategy for future analysis of representative contract samples

Identifying and documenting an enterprise view of “Revenue Recognition” generated impacts across departments (accounting, sales, others), processes (order to cash, deal desk, invoicing) and systems (technical architecture, system selection)

By partnering with the client, RGP was able to help the client leadership team understand the extent of changes caused by the new revenue recognition standard and how current, manual processes wouldn’t be able to scale. The client was also able to identify process and technology integration challenges resulting from several previous acquisitions.

RGP worked with the client to develop an integrated, cross-departmental and phased implementation plan to address the revenue recognition gaps while also solving inherited selected integration challenges from legacy systems.

Sample Engagement — Reorganization, Bankruptcy Support and Human Capital: A U.S. clothing manufacturer and retailer was unable to meet its financial obligations in 2015 and filed for Chapter 11 protection in U.S. bankruptcy court. The client initially hired RGP for a three-week engagement to analyze and reconcile their critical vendor claims. It was important to complete this reconciliation quickly in order for the continued flow of goods from their vendors.

The client’s satisfaction with the initial project led to expansion of the engagement to include an analysis and reconciliation of required supplier claims just prior to the bankruptcy filing, plus administration claims and bankruptcy court reporting, including monthly financial reports.

Because of employee layoffs as well as employee attrition due to the Chapter 11 filing, the company was unable to perform certain critical functions. RGP provided consultants to serve as interim controller; AP Manager; Budgeting Manager and HR Manager, including the handling of WARN Act notices, layoffs and COBRA matters. With RGP’s support, the company successfully exited bankruptcy.

This client continued to have financial difficulty and filed chapter 11 again. RGP was hired to reconcile all of the claims and assist with the claims objections. In addition, during the second engagement RGP provided personnel to clean up and manage AP records, financial reporting, bankruptcy court reporting and prepare 1099 tax forms.

Sample Engagement — Transition of Accounting Cycle Processes Following Significant Acquisition: A Fortune 500 retail company that recently completed a significant acquisition of a competitor embarked on a comprehensive program to recognize synergies from the overlap of certain back-office functions. Under a “lift & shift” scenario, the client engaged RGP to assess the current state of revenue, cash and payables processes for the acquired company and to develop and execute a plan to transition those functions to the client’s existing shared services centers around the world.

Information Management

RGP’s Information Management practice provides planning and execution services in four primary areas: program & project management; business & technology integration; data strategy & management; and IT strategy & advisory. By focusing on the initiative as defined by our clients, RGP can provide continuity of service from the creation or expansion of an overall IT strategy through post-implementation support. In addition to these services, we assist clients in implementation of a variety of technology solutions: enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) systems; strategic“front-of-the-house systems”; human resources (“HR”) information systems; supply chain management systems; core finance and accounting systems; audit compliance systems; and financial reporting, planning and consolidation systems.

The following are examples of the core competencies of our Information Management practice:

Program & Project Management

•    Project management office (“PMO”) design & optimization

•    Project audit & assessments

•    Portfolio rationalization

•    Project management & recovery

Business & Technology Integration

•    Business analysis & process reengineering

•    System stabilization and optimization

•    System selection & implementation

•    Quality assurance & testing

Data Strategy & Management

•    Data analysis, conversion & integration

•    Business intelligence (“BI”) strategy & execution

•    Data governance, security & quality management

•    Business performance management solutions

IT Strategy & Advisory

•    IT assessments & strategic planning

•    Merger planning & integration

•    Outsourcing & shared service strategy

•    Infrastructure, architecture & design services

Sample Engagement — Identification of Significant Inefficiencies and Proposed Solutions: Our client, a large multinational consumer goods company, experienced significant monthly losses due to material waste. Our client’s challenge was to find a way to identify areas of cost savings swiftly and effectively, with better data analytics.

RGP finance and data specialists, working with the client’s IT team, analyzed operating conditions, and designed statistical models and dashboard reporting. As a result, the client now has a weekly view into its material inventory and can initiate stock transfers between factories so that excess material can be utilized where needed, avoiding potential costly write-offs. By identifying production costs across all factories, the client has quick insight into causes of variance and can take action in a timely manner. In addition, relevant factory teams can be held responsible and receive best practice training to improve efficiencies. Finally, the client can utilize the insights to make more efficient capital expenditure decisions for factories using outdated machinery.

Sample Engagement — Improvement in Data Analytics and Data Management Capabilities: A U.S. based public utility wanted to strengthen its advanced analytics capabilities: enterprise reporting, analytic competency and data management capabilities. RGP consultants were tasked to:

Address data quality issues

Improve operational efficiencies for better support, control and ownership of data

Automate data integration across applications to improve operational effectiveness

Leading a multi-year data strategy project to deliver improved analytic and data value to departments in Finance, HR, Marketing, IT, Generation, Transmission & Distributio (“T&D”), RGP consultants initiated and operationalized data management to ensure accurate and reliable data to support company decisions and to fulfill the vision of managing data as a strategic asset. Tasks included:

Mobilizing domain teams to define data terms and develop data warehouse requirements

Orienting teams to data dictionary, data modeling, issue management, data warehouse requirements, testing, training and sustaining processes

Other facets of the engagement included:

Establishing an Analytic Center of Excellence to ensure operational effectiveness and efficiency in analytic and data processes, tools, technology and people

Developing an enterprise-wide process and engaging 300 executives and managers and 450 analysts, project managers, process engineers and utility operations technicians to implement effectively 30 analytic and data projects on 2 year roadmap

Developing 300 standardized enterprise reports in an enterprise report catalog

Skill building with local teams on data warehouse concepts

Building an Oracle warehouse for Finance, HR, Generation, T&D, IT, Supply Chain domains to support Data as a Service (DAAS)

Using the work of RGP consultants, the company improved workforce management and work scheduling for T&D through standardized generation, improved company profitability by reducing costs in finance, HR and IT, and improved supply chain vendor and contract management.

Sample Engagement — Project Leadership for Global Next Generation Program: A Fortune 50 automotive company is implementing a global program to create the next generation of connected vehicle technology and infotainment applications for all North American vehicle production. The RGP team leads the coordination and integration of a highly complex set of services that requires the seamless integration of six external suppliers and eight internal teams, to create a new customer facing registration portal, secure global network and real-time interfaces needed to enable the new services.

RGP consultants serve as technical program management across 13 defined work streams as well as a variety of internal systems integrations that span enterprise infrastructure. The project also includes systems implementation in the form of architecture support and complex systems integration across the 14 teams building the technology components. The RGP Program Manager has managed the transition from vendor selection to solutioning and engineering the services with the supplier and client teams. RGP continues to be the technical systems integrator for all program work streams and horizontal platforms.

Sample Engagement — Integration and Optimization of Significant Acquisition: A large publicly-traded entertainment conglomerate acquired a regional entity that provided home security and monitoring. Our client needed to integrate its existing ordering, billing, supply chain and installation systems with the acquired entity’s systems in order to sell and deliver these new capabilities across its current and prospective customer base. Working with the client’s implementation team, RGP’s activities included:

Serving as interim program manager and senior project manager

Linking and modifying the client’s existing sales programming to bundle the acquired home security/monitoring products

Modifying the existing equipment delivery systems capability to reduce the number of days to final installation

Sample Engagement — BI Strategy/Implementation: A large state utility company required assistance in restarting and reenergizing a stalled enterprise-wide BI initiative focused on increasing overall data definition/management, analysis and reporting to support enterprise-wide business decision making. The RGP engagement consisted of:

Partnering with the client’s corporate stakeholder team to define the current state of the stalled BI initiative and redevelop overall objectives and goals

Providing the framework and approach of how to restart and move forward towards a successful implementation and adoption

Leading the effort to gain stakeholder, management and end userbuy-in for the initiative across the organization

Providing day to day Program Management oversight, focusing on partnering, advising and managing the redefined approach. Critical deliverables included requirements and process definition, data definition and management, report and dashboard definition and development, change management and training and adoption

Sitrick And Company

Sitrick And Company (“Sitrick”) offers a unique combination of strategic counsel, tactical execution, and organizational and logistical support critical to both public and private companies and high profile individuals, both in the United States and overseas. Its extensive experience in strategic, corporate, financial and transactional communications as well as general management, finance, strategic planning, manufacturing and distribution have made Sitrick a partner to boards of directors and management engaged in acquisitions, proxy fights, litigation, management changes, government inquisitions, corporate reorganizations or when repositioning, redirecting or unwinding a business.

Combined with RGP’s broad capabilities and global footprint, Sitrick offers a wide variety of services to clients, including:

Strategic and crisis communications

Repositioning a business or business segment

Litigation support

Bankruptcy administration and management

Corporate and financial advisory

Interim and crisis management

Restructuring and reorganization

Sample Engagement — Financial Restructuring: Sitrick, working with the board of directors, management and other advisors, developed and implemented the strategic communications for the successful restructuring and change in management of a large beverage distributor. This was a cross-border engagement, with the company based in Poland, new investors and management based in Russia and the restructuring in the United States.

Sample Engagement — Litigation Support: Sitrick was retained by a technology company to provide litigation support for a patent infringement suit the company was about to file against a much larger and better known competitor. Sitrick developed a communications strategy that resulted in the case being settled within two days of its filing.

Sample Engagement — Proxy Contest: Sitrick provided strategic communications counsel in a proxy contest launched against an Israeli company where a hedge fund was trying to take control of the board of directors. The company successfully maintained control of the board of directors.

Human Capital

RGP’s Human Capital consultants apply project-management and business analysis skills to help solve the people aspects of business problems. The two primary areas of focus of our human capital practice are change management/business transformation and HR operations. To achieve the desired business outcome, our Human Capital professionals work with client teams to help drive their change management initiatives to successful completion. We help our clients with the people challenges of acquisitions, mergers, downsizing, reorganizations, system implementations or legislative requirements (such as Sarbanes, Basel II, HIPAA and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act). Our Human Capital professionals also have HR operations and technology skills that provide clients with the means to achieve their initiatives. Our Human Capital core competencies revolve around:

Organizational Development and Effectiveness

•    Process analysis development and redesign

•    Change management

•    Organizational alignment and structure

•    Fully integrated performance management and measurement programs

•    Succession and workforce planning

•    Training and skills development strategy

•    Employee retention programs, opinion surveys and communications programs

HR Operations

•    HR leadership

•    HR risk assessment

•    Labor/employee relations and compliance

•    Talent acquisition

•    Policies and procedures

HR Technology

•    System selection, implementation and optimization

•    Project management

•    Change management

•    Data conversion

•    Post-implementation and interim support

Sample Engagement — Financial Management Group Transformation’s Change Management and Program Management Strategy:A global Fortune 100 insurance company is transforming the way it works in order to maximize efficiency and ultimately reduce costs. Given the complexity, breadth and depth of the transformation; the client engaged a team of RGP consultants to create and deploy anend-to-end change management strategy, essential to achieving the program’s goal. The responsible client team is transforming as well, by investing in technology and automation, better data governance, optimizing processes and centralizing and streamlining organizations. They have designed a transformation change management and program management strategy to enhance the realization of the transformation initiative. Phase II of the engagement will include implementation of all change management activities in partnership with the transformation program office.

Sample Engagement — Organizational Capability Assessment and Improvement:A food industry leader was looking to transform business operations in order to maintain its competitive industry position and fuel growth. RGP utilized change management practices, to assess individual skill competencies and organizational capabilities currently in place. Our approach focused on enabling organizational learning and development as a catalyst for change and cultural improvement. We took a business driven approach by defining actions aligned to corporate business strategy. Collaborative workshops promoted a shared vision of the future desired state, while gainingbuy-in and ownership for a three year roadmap of planned initiatives. Executive participation enabled sponsorship for the transformation program, helping to ensure the expected results.

Specific activities included:

Defining a process to develop increased capabilities across the organization, to be executed annually in alignment with the strategic business planning cycle

Developing and executing an annual individual skill competency assessment tool and procedures

Review and gap analysis of strategic departmental goals, identifying capability needs in areas of people, process and technology

Providing assessment results, including organizational capabilities needed to accomplish strategic business objectives, as well as individual and team skill competency development needs

Developing a three year transformation plan chartering business value work streams to achieve needed capabilities

Providing HR functional consulting to help drive people and organizational development, as well as outlining an effective approach to organizational cultural improvement

Sample Engagement — HRIS Module Implementation and Standardization:A private, online media group recently implemented ADP Workforce Now and wanted to integrate other HR modules into their payroll platform including time tracking, leave management and a self-service portal. In addition to an aggressive timeframe, our client was in the middle of major organizational changes including divesting a company, a merger and two acquisitions. As project manager, our consultant was instrumental in delivering the projecton-time, helping our client to fully utilize the system. We also created process standardization and streamlining, reduced transaction processing cost, increased the quality of HR data and produced more complex and comprehensive business metrics. Providingon-site project management and process optimization in this dynamic corporate environment was crucial to the success of the project.

Sample Engagement — Establishment of New Corporate Compensation Function: A fast-growing multi-national pharmaceutical company needed assistance in establishing a new corporate compensation function, addressing core infrastructure issues. Our consultant, working with client personnel, served as Project Manager and subject matter expert, assessing business priorities, developing a compensation philosophy and integrating processes with technology. Specific initiatives included:

Establishing a benchmarking strategy for assessing competitive pay levels, coupled with integrating a pay for performance culture

Evaluating the current HRIS system and identifying relevant issues for replacement

Positioning the HR function as a valued and integral business partner

Sample Engagement — Organizational Design:A Fortune 500 life insurance company wanted to design a new organizational and operating model to provide more efficient, “silo-free” operations. Partnering with RGP, our consultants provided subject-matter expertise on organizational design and an operating model development approach, process and content. Specifically, RGP supported the initiative by:

Conductingin-depth current state organizational reviews

Developing a comprehensive culture and change impact assessment to identify benefits and challenges of the new operating model

Evaluating the impact on human capital of a shared services center andoff-shoring implementation

Presenting key aspects of the operating model design approach to management and staff and assessing potential interdependencies with other work streams outside of the HR function

Legal & Regulatory

RGP Legal helps clients execute their legal, risk management and regulatory initiatives. Our consultants (consisting of attorneys, compliance professionals, paralegals and contract managers) have significant experience working at the nation’s top law firms and companies. RGP Legal provides general counsel access to exceptional talent on an agile basis for the exact subject-matter knowledge and business perspective required for a particular task or workflow. Generally, RGP Legal is engaged to work directly within-house counsel or with traditional outside counsel for projects or pieces of “unbundled” work. Examples of our core competencies include:

Project Services

Commercial agreement review

Compliance support (FCPA, Dodd-Frank, data privacy)

Proxy and quarterly SEC support

Corporate governance

Legal Operations and Business Strategy

Legal project management, process improvement, change management

Legal spend analysis

Strategic sourcing and convergence

Contract, knowledge, matter management

Technology assessment, selection, implementation and optimization

Organizational design

Unbundling Legal Services

Litigation management and support, including document review and analysis, investigations and regulatory reviews

M&A due diligence, closing, integration

Real estate due diligence

Sample Engagement — Assistance with Critical Software Deployment: Our client, a significant developer and distributor of entertainment projects, is implementing an online rights and contract management platform, to capture critical business and legal terms from contracts related to original production and development of new scripted and unscripted television and movie content.

RGP has been retained to provide advisory services to assist in putting together best practices, protocols, quality control, training, metrics and other tasks related to overall project management, as well as attorneys to provide substantive legal expertise by conducting the rights analysis of the contracts and capturing consistent and accurate data. The project is ‘business critical” — the new system must ultimately be an effective tool that helps drive revenue, enforce compliance and mitigate risk.

Sample Engagement — Assessment to Mitigate Reputational Harm, Regulatory Exposure and Litigation Risk: The senior management of a global entity, which had grown rapidly via acquisition to over $2.5 billion in revenue and 100,000 employees, asked RGP to assist in the assessment of mitigation of potential reputational harm, regulatory exposure and litigation risk. In particular, management was concerned about their ability to ensure the security of sensitive financial and personal information for customers, tracking of its contractual commitments, and adherence to applicable laws and regulations. The goal was to assess risk, protect from reputational harm, mitigate against regulatory exposure and litigation and communicate to its clients that the company is a trusted business partner and world-class organization.

RGP was selected to create and conduct a compliance risk assessment. Using the work of RGP consultants, the assessment will position our client to present the following information to the company’s Board of Directors:

The company’s compliance-related obligations from both regulatory and contractual perspectives

Compliance obligations from a people, process and technology perspective, including the company’s method for identifying risks and process to comply, report and resolve incidents

Gaps between company obligations, its current compliance and recommendations to bridge the identified gaps

The company’s current compliance infrastructure and the structure and skills needed for compliance on a global basis

Sample Engagement — Unbundling Support for M&A Activity: Our client, a world leader in thein-flight entertainment and communication solutions business, turned to RGP for supplemental support and expertise in connection with abuy-side acquisition. The client’s general counsel engaged us to supplement the bandwidth of thein-house team. Our consultants drove the diligence process, collaborated extensively with internal business units and, working closely with lead outside counsel who focused on the strategy and structure of the deal, assisted in the drafting of deal documents. The client reduced its legal spend by multi-sourcing the work needed to support the transaction.

Sample Engagement — Law Department Organizational Design: The new general counsel for a multi-billion dollar energy and specialty refining company asked RGP to redesign its legal department structure from the ground up. A series of acquisitions, coupled with a more complex business environment, increased the department’s work flows. Our consultants conducted extensive stakeholder interviews and an analysis of department operations to develop an organizational model stressing business continuity, best practices in organizational design, areas of process and resourcing improvement, and organizational development. RGP’s solution resulted in a leaner legal team that leverages effective and efficient legal services providers, while implementingin-house efficiencies and automation.

Sample Engagement — Development and Implementation of Knowledge Management Tool: Our client, a multi-million dollar asset management firm, lacked an efficient tool for handling information related to its investment/private equity funds. As a result,in-house attorneys often started deals without the benefit of knowledge gleaned from previously negotiated agreements. Documents were difficult to locate, important deal information was lost, and providing information to regulators and third parties was often time consuming and inefficient.

RGP designed a knowledge management tool to increase efficiencies in the client’s deal flow and archiving process. RGP crafted a simple searchable database tool that provided an effective way to access, retrieve, archive and leverage important deal information. RGP also conducted a gap analysis on missing deal documents and developed training to ensure attorneybuy-in and acceptance of the management tool.

Supply Chain Management

RGP’s Supply Chain Management practice assists clients in the planning, execution, maintenance and troubleshooting of complex supply chain systems and processes. Our consultants work as part of client teams to reduce the total cost of ownership, improve business performance and produce results. Specifically, our core competencies include:

Supply Chain Strategy and Advisory

Supply Chain Planning and Forecasting

•    Supply chain technology and strategic planning

•    Merger planning and integration

•    Organizational design, alignment, process, policies and procedures

•    Sales and operations planning

•    Demand and supply planning

•    Production planning

Procurement and Supplier Management

Manufacturing and Operations

•    Strategic sourcing

•    Contract and supplier relationship management

•    Procure-to-pay

•    Manufacturing assessment and strategy

•    Production process

•    LEAN/Six Sigma

Logistics and Materials Management

Supply Chain Risk and Compliance

•    Inventory and transportation management

•    Distribution network analysis

•    Reverse logistics

•    Risk assessments

•    Regulatory compliance

•    Third party oversight

Sample Engagement Negotiation, Monitoring and Supervision of Construction Projects:Our client, a Fortune 1000 technology company, has multiple priorities in procurement and design of internal construction projects. Working with the client’s personnel, RGP consultants oversaw the negotiation and implementation of construction/redesign projects at the client’s corporate headquarters. The client’s primary concerns were: design consistency with the company’s culture, operating within a set budget, andon-time completion of the various projects.

RGP provided procurement personnel to work closely with our client’s counterparts to negotiate, monitor, and supervise construction projects. In addition, RGP consultants provided budget management for the client’s procurement department and an advisory/quality assurance lead. The client lacked procurement expertise and construction/real estate sourcing knowledge. RGP built a detailed timeline collaborating with the client and their commercial real estate company. Our consultants negotiated project costs leveraging future growth opportunities, especially with subcontractor firms, reviewed quotes, researched benchmarks and imposed cost structure across the client’s organization. In addition, RGP worked with the client’s legal department to negotiate and document contract parameters. Ultimately, the client estimates it was able to achieve a 6.5% cost savings.

Sample Engagement — Vendor Risk Management Software Selection and Monitoring: A publicly-traded financial services company wanted to effectively and proactively identify and manage previously unaddressed significant vendor risks. Working collaboratively, a cross-functional team of client personnel and RGP consultants developed a comprehensive vendor performance monitoring function. The team identified three key project work streams: 1) establishment of solutions to support and maintain the client’s third party vendor management processes, systems, standards and metrics tracking; 2) development of user guides and materials and training on the selected software tool to support the function; 3) development and support of the day to day processes to ensure compliance with regulations, guidelines and firm requirements. Specifically, RGP was responsible for:

Developing the framework and vendor scorecards

Conducting certification and governance maturity assessments

Conductingon-site vendor assessments, certification and governance

Developing program processes, policies and procedures

Assisting with management of the selected software implementation

Sample Engagement — Improvement inOn-Line Checkout:A U.S. based product distributor initiated a major campaign to drive consumers to using ane-commerce platform. However, during checkout, customers realized that shipping and handling fees associated with the purchase were too high, resulting in an 80% cart abandonment rate and a significant loss in sales. In the currente-commerce environment, consumers have been trained to expect free shipping, free shipping over a specific order value or flat rate shipping.

The client engaged RGP to identify short term solutions to reduce shipping and handling charges prior to the next selling season, as well as longer term ideas for future releases. After conducting a four week assessment of the recent sales cycle and associated data, RGP consultants provided specific recommendations to reduce shipping and handling costs, reduce the order cycle and transit time and reduce packaging waste. In addition, observations were made to improve the consumer experience, with the goal of increasing sales.

Sample Engagement —Procure-to-Pay Assessment:A large multinational consumer electronic company needed assistance in conducting an assessment of itsProcure-to-Pay process to review performance and to identify recommendations to fill gaps. The client had two primary goals: 1) to assess the current state; and 2) to provide insights on the future state, with comparison to leading practices and a high-level implementation roadmap. RGP, acting in project management and business analyst roles, was tasked with:

Documenting the current process, controls and policies and procedures

Outlining benefits of using the new Oracle system

Providing analysis of current staff skills and appropriate staff size

Providing recommendations on procure to pay strategy, priorities, organizational structure, risks and dependencies

Assessing supplier selection, certification and performance monitoring

Developing recommendations for future state, including ways to maximize effectiveness and efficiency, optimizing cost structures and mitigating risk exposures

Sample Engagement — Cost Recovery Review: One of the world’s largest multinational energy companies engaged RGP to provide services to ensure contract compliance and to identify cost recovery opportunities with a supplier of significant services. Performing services at the supplier location, the RGP consultants developed the procedure plan, conducted supplier interviews, performed test work on selected transactions and issued a final report. The findings ultimately resulted in a recovery for the client and an enhanced understanding with the supplier.

Governance, Risk and Compliance (“GRC”): Corporate Governance, Risk Management, Internal Audit and Compliance Services

RGP’s GRC practice assists clients with a variety of governance, risk management, internal audit and compliance initiatives. The professionals in our GRC practice have experience in operations, controllership and internal and external audit and serve our clients in any number of roles required — from program manager to team member. In addition to helping clients worldwide in the areas of audit, risk and compliance, we are able to draw on RGP’s other practice areas to bring the required business expertise to the engagement. Our GRC core competencies include:

Enterprise Risk Management

Sarbanes and Internal Controls

•    Strategic and operational objectives and risk assessment

•    Risk management and monitoring process development

•    Implementation of comprehensive ERM programs

•    Documentation and testing of key controls

•    COSO framework documentation

•    Control rationalization and self-assessment

•    Remediation of control deficiencies

•    Internal auditco-sourcing

Contract and Regulatory Compliance Audits

Operational and IT Audits

•    Regulatory compliance assessments

•    Royalty, license and franchise partner audits

•    Specialized skill sets and subject matter expertise

•    Global geographic coverage

•    Audit plan development and periodic risk assessment

Sample Engagement — Global Internal Audit & Internal Controls Delivery:A global technology leader decided to outsource its internal controls testing andco-source its internal audit needs, engaging RGP on a multi-yearco-sourcing and advisory contract. During the transition phase, RGP created a core delivery team of experts and set up a dedicated, offshored testing/audit center.

For internal audit, RGP carries out internal audits on behalf of the client, following the client’s specific audit methodology. Deploying consultants from our offices in cities where our client has operations, RGP adds local knowledge and skills to the client’s fieldwork. To fully integrate the methodology, RGP created customized onboarding and training.

For internal controls testing, the client leverages RGP in a cost-efficient manner versus developing its own larger internal audit team. In addition, by leveraging industry best practices in control and finance compliance audits, RGP provides our client with better insights into more efficient ways of working and control. The client further leverages cost control by having RGP consultants perform a large portion of independent (local) testing to reduce time and budget of the external auditor.

Sample Engagement — Creation of Corporate Compliance Function:A leading independent specialty chemical company needed an effective compliance program to meet federal regulations and all necessary standards, procedures and training to support it. RGP established the client’s first corporate compliance function with three major areas of significance: Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance (FCPA), Global trade compliance (OFAC) and Federal Acquisition Regulation compliance (FAR). RGP provided the client with the overall compliance framework, policies, procedures and tools necessary to support an effective compliance program.

Sample Engagement — Enterprise Risk Management:A Fortune 1000 U.S. based financial services company launched an initiative to significantly increase the risk governance and standardization of project management within their organization. Our enterprise risk management consultants focused on establishing more consistent, simplified processes to optimize the risk management process and create ways to identify and implement standardization of reporting, process and procedures across all lines of business. Our work will establish a comprehensive view of projects, enabling reporting and escalation to significantly mitigate their risk.

Sample Engagement — Documentation and Enhancement of Internal Controls in Preparation for IPO or Sale:A highly profitable and fast growing maker of electronic equipment had both inadequate IT general controls and poor documentation of its processes. As a result, highly detailed and expensive substantive audit procedures needed to be performed in order to prepare financial statements for a contemplated IPO or sale of the company. Serving as project manager and change management lead, RGP consultants performed an assessment of IT general controls, identified critical risk areas and prepared detailed action plans to remediate or implement controls.

Sample Engagement — Documentation and Enhancement of Internal Controls:A rapidly growing maker of automation software needed an assessment of current state business processes and internal controls at its U.S. and India operations for Sarbanes and general business purposes. Our consultants documented current state of internal controls, made recommendations for enhanced future state of controls and presented our findings to executive management. The assessments identified a significant number of high risk items that the client was unaware of, with actionable recommendations for improvement.

Sample Engagement — Banking Compliance Support:Our client, a Fortune 500 financial services company, wanted to develop and implement a more formal approach to the assessment of the company’s regulatory risk profile. Previously, decisions on assessment of regulatory risk were more of an intuitive exercise than a formalized methodology. To help the client evolve its process, RGP was responsible for the entire project, including:

Identifying risk topics for each product type (real estate loans, consumer loans, credit cards, deposits, trusts and others)

Determining gaps in regulation coverage

Creating risk statements for each product

Defining the inherent and control risk definitions

Building and scoring the templates to be used to document the efforts

The final deliverable allowed bank management to better allocate limited resources to maximize coverage of critical compliance issues using the quantifiable basis of risk assessment. Ultimately, RGP consultants deployed the methodology through other facets of the company’s operation, including property/casualty and life insurance and investment management.

Sample Engagement — Audit IT Security Controls:The CIO of a global healthcare company headquartered in Europe planned a series of global IT audits. Working as a part of a client team, RGP was responsible for an assessment of the strength and sophistication of the IT security organization, implementation of the IT security governance model, conducting a series of interviews with top management stakeholders in the IT organization, and transfer of knowledge on audit techniques.

policyIQ

RGP’s policyIQ is our proprietary cloud-based GRC software application, enabling the focused management of a wide range of GRC processes, including Risk Assessments, Sarbanes Compliance, Policy and Procedure Management, Internal Audit Programs, Anti-Corruption Compliance and Contract Administration. policyIQ can be implemented quickly to manage a specific aspect of an overall GRC program, or easily scaled to integrate multiple initiatives, allowing the organization to realize greater efficiency. In addition, our engagement teams often utilize policyIQ as a tool to assist in the efficient collection, storing and review of project workpapers, deliverables and other critical project content. Business problems that our clients have used policyIQ to resolve include:

Sarbanes Compliance Management: Clients use policyIQ to manage their entire Sarbanes compliance program, from risk assessment through remediation tracking. Electronic forms automate quarterly certifications, and reporting allows all stakeholders insight into the status of Sarbanes compliance at any time.

Policy and Procedure Management: With policyIQ as the central location for all organizational policies and procedures, all employees have access to the most current documentation — and using electronic forms, can easily document annual proof of compliance.

Internal Audit Programs: Companies use policyIQ to capture workpapers electronically, gathering all evidence in a central location and assigning testing to the appropriate auditors. With robust reporting, audit managers have oversight into the process and withbuilt-in workflow, audits can flow through appropriate channels of approval.

Contract Management: policyIQ provides a central, secure location to house all contract documentation, allowing companies to index contracts for ease of searching and align view, edit and approve security appropriately. By utilizing custom fields to capture standard meta data, contracts can be categorized and communications established to alert all stakeholders of upcoming renewals or milestones.

Sample Engagement — Fresh Approach to Sarbanes Compliance: For a publicly traded manufacturing company with global operations, RGP was engaged to bring efficiency and consistency to its Sarbanes compliance and internal audit programs. Using policyIQ, our consulting team was able to:

Implement the 2013 COSO Framework, with mapping to entity level controls, in order to meet expectations by external auditors and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Integrate workflow processes on all control reviews and audit testing to improve quality assurance over documentation and oversight on audit testing

Establish consistent processes for Sarbanes documentation and testing across multiple business units

Operations

We generally provide our professional services to clients at a local level, with the oversight of our regional managing directorsmarket leaders and consultation of our corporate management team. The managing director,market leaders and client service director(s) and recruiting director(s)development directors in each officemarket are responsible for initiating client relationships, ensuring client satisfaction throughout engagements, coordinating services for clients on a national and international platform and maintaining client relationships post-engagement. Market revenue leadership and their teams identify, develop and close new and existing client opportunities, often working in a coordinated effort with other markets on multi-national/multi-location proposals. 

Market level leadership works closely with our regionalized talent management team, who are responsible for identifying, hiring and cultivating a sustainable relationship with seasoned professionals fitting the RGP profile of client needs. Our consultant recruiting efforts are regionally and nationally based, depending upon the skill set required; talent management handles both the identification and hiring of consultants specifically skilled to perform client projects ensuring clientas well as monitoring the satisfaction of consultants during and consultant satisfaction throughout engagements and maintaining client relationships post-engagement. Throughout this process,post-completion of assignments. The talent teams focus on getting the corporate management team and regional managing directors are available to consult with the managing director with respect to client services.

Our offices operate in an entrepreneurial manner. The managing directors of our offices are given significant autonomyright talent in the daily operationsright place at the right time.

6


sales and marketing, pricing and hiring within their office. We believe a substantial portion of the buying decisions made by our clients are made on a local or regional basis and that our offices most often compete with other professional services providers on a local or regional basis. BecauseWe continue to believe our managing directorslocal market leaders are in the best positionwell-positioned to understand the local and regional outsourced professional services marketmarket. Additionally, the complexity of relationships with many of our multinational clients also dictates that in some circumstances a hybrid model, bringing the best of both locally driven relationships as well as global focus and because clients often prefer local relationships, we believe a decentralized operating environment maximizes operating performance and contributes todelivery, is important for employee and client satisfaction. Through our Borderless Talent Initiative, which we are in the process of implementing, we are seeking to capitalize on our multinational clients’ needs for a service provider that can partner with them on a global basis by organizing the concerted effort and talent team on a global basis to serve these clients through one integrated service platform. For projects requiring intimate knowledge and thought leadership on particular client concerns, our Advisory and Project Services group consists of individuals with requisite depth of expertise and tools to work with clients.

We believe our ability to deliver professional services successfully to clients is dependent on our managing directorsleaders in the field working together as a collegial and collaborative team, at times working jointly on client projects.team. To build a sense of team effortspirit and increase camaraderie among our managing directors,leaders, we have an incentivea program for our office managementfield personnel that awards annual bonusesincentives based on bothspecific agreed-to goals focused on the performance of the Companyindividual and the performance of the individual.Company. We also share across the Company the best and most effective practices of our highest achieving offices and use this as an introductory tool with new managingvice presidents and directors. New managing directorsleadership also spendspends time with another practice, partneringin other markets or otherwise partners with experienced managing directorssales and other senior management personnel.recruiting personnel in those markets to understand, among many skills, how best to serve current clients, expand our presence with prospects and identify and recruit highly qualified consultants. This allows the veteran managing directorsleadership to share their success stories, foster theour culture of the Company with new managingvice presidents and directors and review specific client and consultant development programs. We believe these team-based practices enable us to better serve clients who prefer a centrally organized service approach.

From our corporate headquarters in Irvine, California, we provide centralized administrative, marketing, finance, HR, IT,human resources (“HR”), information technology (“IT”), legal and real estate support. Our financial reporting is also centralized in our corporate service center. This center handles invoicing, accounts payable and collections, and administers HR services including employee compensation and benefits administration for North American offices. We also have a business support operations center in our Utrecht, Netherlands office to provide centralized finance, HR, IT, payroll and legal support to our European offices. We share our Salesforce software platform world-wide, providing a common database of identified opportunities, prospective new clients, and existing client proposals for additional projects. In addition, in North America, we have a corporate networked IT platform with centralized financial reporting capabilities and a front office client management system. These centralized functions minimize the administrative burdens on our office management and allow them to spend more time focusedfocusing on client and consultant development.

Business Development

Our business development initiatives are composed of:



·local and global initiatives focused on existing clients and target companies

·national and international targeting efforts focused on multinational companies

·brand marketing activities

·national and local advertising and direct mail programs



national and international targeting efforts focused on multinational companies

brand marketing activities

national and local advertising and direct mail programs

Our business development efforts are driven by the networking and sales efforts of our management. While local senior management focus on market-related activities, they are also part of the regional, national and international sales efforts, especially when the client is part of a multinational entity. In addition, the local office managing directorscertain markets, sales efforts are assistedalso enhanced by management professionals focused solely on business development efforts on a market and national basis based on firm-wide and industry-focused initiatives. These business development professionals, teamed with the managing directorvice-presidents and client service teams, are responsible for initiating and fostering relationships with the senior management and decision makers of our targeted client companies. During fiscal 2017,2018, we commencedcompleted our implementation of software from SalesForce.com asSalesforce.com on a toolworld-wide basis to enhance our local and worldwide business development efforts.

We believe that our national marketing efforts have been effective in generatingeffectively generated incremental revenues from existing clients and developingdeveloped new client relationships. Our brand marketing initiatives help developbolster RGP’s imagereputation in the markets we serve. Our brand is reinforced by our professionally designed website, print, and online advertising, direct marketing, seminars, initiative-oriented brochures, social media and public relations efforts. We believe our branding initiatives, coupled with our high-quality client service, help to differentiate us from our competitors and to establish RGP as a credible and reputable global professional services firm.

7


Competition

We operate in a competitive, fragmented market and compete for clients and consultants with a variety of organizations that offer similar services. Our principal competitors include:

 

·consulting firms

local, regional, national and international accounting and law

·local, regional, national and international accounting and other traditional professional services firms

·independent contractors

·traditional and Internet-based staffing firms

·the in-house or former in-house resources of our clients



independent contractors

traditional and Internet-based staffing firms

thein-house or formerin-house resources of our clients

We compete for clients on the basis of the quality of professionals we bring to our clients, the timely availability of professionals with requisite skills,knowledge base they possess, our ability to mobilize the right talent quickly, the scope and price of services, and the geographic reach of services. We believe our attractive value proposition, consisting of our highly qualified consultants, relationship-oriented approach and professional culture, enables us to differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Although we believe we compete favorably with our competitors, many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources, generate greater revenues and have greater name recognition than we do.effectively in the marketplace.

Employees

As of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, we had a total of 3,3013,433 employees, including 732 corporate938 management and local officeadministrative employees and 2,5692,495 consultants. Our employees are not covered by any collective bargaining agreements.

Available Information

The Company’s

Our principal executive offices are located at 17101 Armstrong Avenue, Irvine, California 92614. The Company’sOur telephone number is(714) 430-6400 and itsour website address is http://www.rgp.com. The information set forth in the website does not constitute part of this Annual Report onForm 10-K. We file our annual reports onForm 10-K, quarterly reports onForm 10-Q, and current reports onForm 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the SEC electronically. These reports are maintained on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

A free copy of our annual reports onForm 10-K, quarterly reports onForm 10-Q, and current reports onForm 8-K and amendments to those reports may also be obtained free of charge on the Investor Relations page of our website at http://www.rgp.comwww.ir.rgp.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports with the SEC.



ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS.

You should carefully consider theITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS.

The risks described below should be considered carefully before making a decision to buy shares of our common stock.stock is made. The order of the risks is not an indication of their relative weight or importance. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us but do represent those risks and uncertainties we believe are material to us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely impact and impair our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you might lose all or part of your investment.the investment in our common stock might be lost. When determining whether to buy our common stock, you should also refer to the other information in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, including our financial statements and the related notes.notes should also be reviewed.

Our business is subject to risks arising from epidemic diseases, such as the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic, and the United States and other governmental authorities issued stay-at-home orders, proclamations and directives aimed at minimizing the spread of the virus. The impact of the Pandemic and the resulting restrictions have caused disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and may continue to disrupt financial markets and global economic activities.

A pandemic, including COVID-19, or other public health epidemic poses the risk that we or our employees and partners may be prevented from conducting business activities at full capacity for an indefinite period of time, including due to the spread of the disease or due to shutdowns that are requested or mandated by governmental authorities. The continued spread of COVID-19 and the measures taken by the governments of countries affected and in which we operate may, among other things, reduce demand for or delay client decisions to procure our services, or result in cancellations of existing projects. We may also experience a decline in productivity, impacting our ability to continue to serve our clients efficiently. The Pandemic may also have impacted, and may continue to impact, the overall financial condition of some of our clients and their ability to pay outstanding receivables owed to us. While the full impact from the Pandemic is not quantifiable, we experienced some of the foregoing risks during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 and, as a result, our results of operations and cash flows were adversely impacted for the year ended May 30, 2020. For example, during the last

8


12 non-holiday weeks in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, which started with the week ended March 7, 2020, our average weekly revenue declined 9.1% compared to the first eight non-holiday weeks of the 2020 calendar year.  Our number of consultants also decreased from 2,965 as of May 25, 2019 to 2,495 as of May 30, 2020. Due to the disruption of business operations in the U.S. and globally, we have also experienced some decline in our pipeline, and we expect the adverse effects of the Pandemic will continue into fiscal 2021. Furthermore, we have experienced declines in the market price of our stock subsequent to the end of the third quarter. If there are further decreases in our stock price for a sustained period or other unfavorable factors, we may be required to perform a goodwill impairment assessment, which may result in a recognition of goodwill impairment.  Although the impairment is a non-cash expense, it could be material to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In addition, we have followed government mandatory stay-at-home orders in certain regions, and suspended all non-essential travel worldwide for our employees, which could negatively affect our business. The extent to which the Pandemic impacts our results will depend on future economic downturndevelopments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severity of the virus and the actions to contain its impact. While not yet quantifiable, management expects this situation will have an adverse impact to our operating results in fiscal 2021.

Economic conditions or changechanges in the use of outsourced professional services consultants could adversely affect our business.

While we believe general economic conditions continue to improve

The Pandemic has caused disruptions in most parts of the world, there continues to be someU.S. and global economy, and continued uncertainty regarding general economic conditions within some regions and countries in which we operate leadinghas led to reluctance on the part of some multinational companies to spend on discretionary projects. This has partially contributed to the decrease in hours worked and the number of professional services consultants at RGP from fiscal 2019 to 2020. Deterioration of or increasedprolonged uncertainty related to the global economy or tightening credit markets could result in a reduction infurther reduce the demand for our services and adversely affect our business in the future. In addition, the use of professional services consultants on aproject-by-project basis could decline fornon-economic reasons. In the event of a reduction in the demand for our consultants, our financial results would suffer.

Economic deterioration at one or more of our clients may also affect our allowance for doubtful accounts. Our estimate of losses resulting from our clients’ failure to make required payments for services rendered has historically been within our

expectations and the provisions established. However,While our overall receivable collections have not been severely impacted by the Pandemic, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of our clients could cause unfavorable trends in receivable collections and cash flows and additional allowances may be required. These additional allowances could materially affect the Company’sour future financial results.

In addition, we are required to periodically, but at least annually, to assess the recoverability of certain assets, including deferred tax assets and goodwill. Softening ofContinued downturns in the United States economy and international economies could adversely affect our evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets, requiring us to record additional tax valuation allowances. Our assessment of impairment of goodwill is currently based upon comparing our market capitalization to our net book value. Therefore, a significant and protracted downturn in the future market value of our stock could potentially result in an impairment reductions of goodwill and such an adjustmentour goodwill. Although the impairment is a non-cash expense, it could materially affect the Company’sour future financial results and financial condition.

The market for professional services is highly competitive, and if we are unable to compete effectively against our competitors, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

We operate in a competitive, fragmented market, and we compete for clients and consultants with a variety of organizations that offer similar services. The competition is likely to increase in the future due to the expected growth of the market and the relatively few barriers to entry. Our principal competitors include:



consulting firms;

·consulting firms

·local, regional, national and international accounting and other traditional professional services firms

·independent contractors

·traditional and Internet-based staffing firms

·the in-house or former in-house resources of our clients



local, regional, national and international accounting and other traditional professional services firms;

independent contractors;

traditional and Internet-based staffing firms; and

thein-house or formerin-house resources of our clients.

We cannot assure youprovide assurance that we will be able to compete effectively against existing or future competitors. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources, greater revenues and greater name recognition, which may afford them an advantage in attracting and retaining clients and consultants and in offering pricing concessions. Some of our competitors in certain markets do not provide medical and other benefits to their consultants, thereby allowing them to potentially charge lower rates to clients. In addition, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to changes in companies’ needs and developments in the professional services industry.

9


Our business depends upon our ability to secure new projects from clients and, therefore, we could be adversely affected if we fail to do so.

We do not have long-term agreements with our clients for the provision of services and our clients may terminate engagements with us at any time. The success of our business is dependent on our ability to secure new projects from clients. For example, if we are unable to secure new client projects because of improvements in our competitors’ service offerings, or because of a change in government regulatory requirements, or because of an economic downturn decreasing the demand for outsourced professional services, our business is likely to be materially adversely affected. New impediments to our ability to secure projects from clients may develop over time, such as the increasing use by large clients ofin-house procurement groups that manage their relationship with service providers.

We may be legally liable for damages resulting from the performance of projects by our consultants or for our clients’ mistreatment of our personnel.

Many of our engagements with our clients involve projects or services that are critical to our clients’ businesses. If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, we could be subject to legal liability or damage to our reputation, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. While we are not currently subject to any client-related legal claims which we believe are material, it remains possible, because of the nature of our business, that we may be involved in litigation in the future that could materially affect our future financial results. Claims brought against us could have a serious negative effect on our reputation and on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because we are in the business of placing our personnel in the workplaces of other companies, we are subject to possible claims by our personnel alleging discrimination, sexual harassment, negligence and other similar activities by our clients. We may also be subject to similar claims from our clients based on activities by our personnel. The cost of defending such claims, even if groundless, could be substantial and the associated negative publicity could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain personnel and clients.

We may not be able to grow our business, manage our growth or sustain our current business.

Historically, we have grown by opening new offices and by increasing the volume of services provided through existing offices. Since the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we have had difficulty sustaining consistent revenue growth either quarter-over-quarter orBeginning late in sequential quarters and, during fiscal 2017, we closed two offices, oneembarked on several new strategic initiatives, including the implementation of a new operating model to drive growth. In addition, in February 2020, we initiated a plan to consolidate our physical geographic presence to certain key markets while shifting to a virtual operating model in certain other markets. Our ability to execute on those strategies or the U.S. and one in Europe.disruptions related to implementation of the new operating model may impact or limit our ability to grow our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or expand our market presence in our current locations, or to successfully enter other markets or locations.locations or successfully operate our business virtually without a physical presence in all our markets. Our ability to continue to grow our business will depend upon an improving global economy and a number of factors, including our ability to:



grow our client base;

·grow our client base

·expand profitably into new geographies

·drive growth in core markets and the digital transformation space

·provide additional professional services offerings

·hire qualified and experienced consultants

·maintain margins in the face of pricing pressures

·manage costs

·maintain or grow revenues and increase other service offerings from existing clients



expand profitably into new geographies;

provide additional professional services offerings;

hire qualified and experienced consultants;

maintain margins in the face of pricing pressures;

manage costs; and

maintain or grow revenues and increase other service offerings from existing clients.

Even if we are able to resume more rapid growth in our revenue, the growth will result in new and increased responsibilities for our management as well as increased demands on our internal systems, procedures and controls, and our administrative, financial, marketing and other resources. For instance, a limited number of clients are requesting that certain engagements be of a fixed fee nature rather than our traditional hourly time and materials approach, thus shifting a portion of the burden of financial risk and monitoring to us. Failure to adequately respond to these new responsibilities and demands may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

10


Our ability to serve clients internationally is integral to our strategy and our international activities expose us to additional operational challenges that we might not otherwise face.

Our international activities require us to confront and manage a number of risks and expenses that we would not face if we conducted our operations solely in the United States. Any of these risks or expenses could cause a material negative effect on our operating results. These risks and expenses include:



difficulties in staffing and managing foreign offices as a result of, among other things, distance, language and cultural differences;

·difficulties in staffing and managing foreign offices as a result of, among other things, distance, language and cultural differences

·less flexible or future changes in labor laws and regulations in the U.S. and in foreign countries

·expenses associated with customizing our professional services for clients in foreign countries

·foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations when we sell our professional services in denominations other than United States dollars

·protectionist laws and business practices that favor local companies

·political and economic instability in some international markets

·multiple, conflicting and changing government laws and regulations

·trade barriers

·compliance with stringent and varying privacy laws in the markets in which we operate

·reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries

·potentially adverse tax consequences



less flexible or future changes in labor laws and regulations in the U.S. and in foreign countries;

expenses associated with customizing our professional services for clients in foreign countries;

foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations when we sell our professional services in denominations other than United States’ dollars;

protectionist laws and business practices that favor local companies;

political and economic instability in some international markets;

multiple, conflicting and changing government laws and regulations;

trade barriers;

reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; and

potentially adverse tax consequences.

We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, companies, and these acquisitions could disrupt our business.

We have acquired several companies, including two in each of fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2018, and we may continue to acquire companies in the future. Entering into an acquisition entails many risks, any of which could harm our business, including:



diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;

·diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns

·failure to integrate the acquired company with our existing business

·failure to motivate, or loss of, key employees from either our existing business or the acquired business

·failure to identify certain risks or liabilities during the due diligence process

·potential impairment of relationships with our existing employees and clients

·additional operating expenses not offset by additional revenue

·incurrence of significant non-recurring charges

·incurrence of additional debt with restrictive covenants or other limitations

·addition of significant amounts of intangible assets, including goodwill, that are subject to periodic assessment of impairment, primarily through comparison of market value of our stock to our net book value, with such non-cash impairment potentially resulting in a material impact on our future financial results and financial condition

·dilution of our stock as a result of issuing equity securities

·assumption of liabilities of the acquired company



11


Our failure to integrate the acquired companybe successful in addressing these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our existing business;

past or future acquisitions could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions, incur unanticipated liabilities and harm our business generally.



failure to motivate, or loss of, key employees from either our existing business or the acquired business;

potential impairment of relationships with our employees and clients;

additional operating expenses not offset by additional revenue;

incurrence of significantnon-recurring charges;

incurrence of additional debt with restrictive covenants or other limitations;

addition of significant amounts of intangible assets, including goodwill, that are subject to periodic assessment of impairment, primarily through comparison of market value of our stock to our net book value, with such impairment potentially resulting in a material impact on our future financial results and financial condition;

dilution of our stock as a result of issuing equity securities; and

assumption of liabilities of the acquired company.

We must provide our clients with highly qualified and experienced consultants, and the loss of a significant number of our consultants, or an inability to attract and retain new consultants, could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our business involves the delivery of professional services, and our success depends on our ability to provide our clients with highly qualified and experienced consultants who possess the skills and experience necessary to satisfy their needs. At various times, such professionals can be in great demand, particularly in certain geographic areas or if they have specific skill sets. Our ability to attract and retain consultants with the requisite experience and skills depends on several factors including, but not limited to, our ability to:



provide our consultants with either full-time or flexible-time employment;

·provide our consultants with either full-time or flexible-time employment

·obtain the type of challenging and high-quality projects our consultants seek

·pay competitive compensation and provide competitive benefits

·provide our consultants with flexibility as to hours worked and assignment of client engagements



obtain the type of challenging and high-quality projects that our consultants seek;

pay competitive compensation and provide competitive benefits; and

provide our consultants with flexibility as to hours worked and assignment of client engagements.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in accomplishing any of these factors and, even if we are, we cannot assure we will be successful in attracting and retaining the number of highly qualified and experienced consultants necessary to maintain and grow our business.

Decreased effectiveness

We may be unable to realize the level of equity compensation couldbenefit that we expect from our restructuring initiatives, which may adversely impact our business and results of operations.

We may be unable to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of restructuring initiatives we have undertaken, which may adversely impact our business and results of operations. In response to changes in industry and market conditions, we have undertaken in the past, and may undertake in the future, restructuring, reorganization, or other strategic initiatives and business transformation plans to realign our resources with our growth strategies, operate more efficiently and control costs. For example, on February 27, 2020, management and our board of directors committed to a restructuring plan to reduce approximately 7.5% of our management and administrative workforce and consolidate our geographic presence to certain key markets. The restructuring plan was designed to streamline our organizational structure, reduce operating costs and more effectively align resources with business priorities. The successful implementation of our restructuring activities may from time to time require us to effect business and asset dispositions, workforce reductions, management restructurings, decisions to limit investments in or otherwise exit businesses, office consolidations and closures, and other actions, each of which may depend on a number of factors that may not be within our control. 

Any such effort to realign or streamline our organization may result in the recording of restructuring or other charges, such as asset impairment charges, contract and lease termination costs, exit costs, termination benefits, and other restructuring costs. Further, as a result of restructuring initiatives, we may experience a loss of continuity, loss of accumulated knowledge and/or inefficiency, adverse effects on employee morale, loss of key employees and/or other retention issues during transitional periods. Reorganization and restructuring can impact a significant amount of management and other employees’ time and focus, which may divert attention from operating and growing our business. Further, upon completion of any restructuring initiatives, our business may not be more efficient or effective than prior to the implementation of the plan and we may be unable to achieve anticipated operating enhancements or cost reductions, which would adversely affect our ability to attractbusiness, competitive position, operating results and retain employees.financial condition. 

We have historically used stock options as a component of our employee compensation program in order to align employees’ interests with the interests of our stockholders, encourage employee retention and provide competitive compensation packages. A significant portion of our options outstanding awarded prior to fiscal 2012 are priced at more than the current per share market value of our stock, limiting the grants from those years as a significant incentive to retain employees.

Our computer hardware and software and telecommunications systems are susceptible to damage, breach or interruption.

The management of our business is aided by the uninterrupted operation of our computer and telecommunication systems. These systems are vulnerable to security breaches, natural disasters or other catastrophic events, computer viruses, or other interruptions or damage stemming from power outages, equipment failure or unintended usage by employees. In particular, our employees may have access or exposure to personally identifiable or otherwise confidential information and customer data and systems, the misuse of which could result in legal liability. In addition, we rely on information technology systems to process, transmit and store electronic information and to communicate among our locations around the world and with our clients, partners and consultants. The breadth and complexity of this infrastructure increases the potential risk of security breaches. Security breaches, including cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions by computer hackers, foreign governments, cyber terrorists or others with grievances against the industry in which we operate or us in particular, may disable or damage the proper functioning of our networks and systems. We review and update our systems and have implemented processes and procedures to protect against security breaches and unauthorized access to our data. Despite our implementation of security controls, our systems and networks are vulnerable to computer viruses, malware, worms, hackers and other security issues, including physical and electronic break-ins, router disruption, sabotage or espionage, disruptions from unauthorized

12


access and tampering (including through social engineering such as phishing attacks), impersonation of authorized users and coordinated denial-of-service attacks. For example, in the past we have experienced cyber security incidents resulting from unauthorized access to our systems, which to date have not had a material impact on our business or results of operations; however, there is no assurance that such impacts will not be material in the future. Our systems may be subject to additional risk introduced by software that we license from third parties. This licensed software may introduce vulnerabilities within our own operations as it is integrated with our systems, or as we provide client services through partnership agreements.

It is also possible that our security controls over personal and other data may not prevent unauthorized access to, or destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of personally identifiable or other proprietary, confidential, sensitive or valuable information of ours or others; this access could lead to potential unauthorized disclosure of confidential personal, Company or client information that others could use to compete against us or for other disruptive, destructive or harmful purposes and outcomes. Any such disclosure or damage to our networks and systems could subject us to third party claims against us and reputational harm. If these events occur, our ability to attract new clients may be impaired or we may be subjected to damages or penalties. In addition, system-wide or local failures of these information technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our cash

Failure to comply with data privacy laws and short-term investments areregulations could have a materially adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations or financial condition, or have other adverse consequences.

The collection, hosting, transfer, disclosure, use, storage and security of personal information required to provide our services is subject to economic risk.

The Company invests its cash, cash equivalentsfederal, state and short-term investmentsforeign data privacy laws. These laws, which are not uniform, do one or more of the following: regulate the collection, transfer (including in foreignsome cases, the transfer outside the country of collection), processing, storage, use and domestic bank deposits, money market funds, commercial paperdisclosure of personal information, require notice to individuals of privacy practices; give individuals certain access and certificatescorrection rights with respect to their personal information; and prevent the use or disclosure of deposit. Certainpersonal information for secondary purposes such as marketing. Under certain circumstances, some of these investments are subjectlaws require us to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks. Inprovide notification to affected individuals, data protection authorities and/or other regulators in the event of a data breach. In many cases, these risks causedlaws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information among us and our subsidiaries. In addition, the European Union adopted a declinecomprehensive General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) that replaced the EU Data Protection Directive and related country-specific legislation. The GDPR became fully effective in valueMay 2018. Complying with the enhanced obligations imposed by the GDPR may result in additional costs to our business and require us to amend certain of our business practices.

Laws and regulations in this area are evolving and generally becoming more stringent. For example, the New York State Department of Financial Services has issued cybersecurity regulations that outline a variety of required security measures for protection of data. Other U.S. states, including California and South Carolina, have also recently enacted cybersecurity laws requiring certain security measures of regulated entities that are broadly similar to GDPR requirements, and we expect other states will follow suit. As these laws continue to evolve, we may be required to make changes to our systems, services, solutions and/or products so as to enable us and/or our clients to meet the new legal requirements, including by taking on more onerous obligations in our contracts, limiting our storage, transfer and processing of data and, in some cases, limiting our service and/or solution offerings in certain locations. Changes in these laws, or the interpretation and application thereof, may also increase our potential exposure through significantly higher potential penalties for non-compliance. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, such laws and regulations and client demand in this area may limit the use of, or demand for, our services, solutions and/or products, make it more difficult and costly to meet client expectations, or lead to significant fines, penalties or liabilities for noncompliance, any of the Company’s investments, itwhich could adversely affect the Company’sour business, financial condition.condition, and results of operations.

Our business could suffer if we lose the services of one or more key members of our senior management.

Our future success depends upon the continued employment of our senior management team. The unforeseen departure of one or more key members of our senior management team could significantly disrupt our operations if we are unable to successfully manage the transition. The replacement of members of senior management can involve significant time and expense and create uncertainties that could delay, prevent the achievement of, or make it more difficult for us to pursue and execute on our business opportunities, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Further, we generally do not havenon-compete agreements with our employees and, therefore, they could terminate their employment with us at any time. Our ability to retain the services of members of our senior management and other key employees could be impacted by a number of factors, including competitors’ hiring practices or the effectiveness of our compensation programs. If members of our senior management or other key employees leave our employ for any reason, they could pursue other employment opportunities with our competitors or otherwise compete with us. If we are unable to retain the services of these key personnel or attract and retain other qualified and experienced personnel on acceptable terms, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our quarterly financial results may be subject to significant fluctuations that may increase the volatility of our stock price.

Our results of operations could vary significantly from quarter to quarter. Factors that could affect our quarterly operating results include:

13

 

our ability to attract new clients and retain current clients;

 

Contents

 

the announcement or introduction of new services by us or any of our competitors;

the expansion of the professional services offered by us or any of our competitors into new locations both nationally and internationally;

changes in the demand for our services by our clients;

the entry of new competitors into any of our markets;

the number of consultants eligible for our offered benefits as the average length of employment with the Company increases;

the amount of vacation hours used by consultants or number of holidays in a quarter, particularly the day of the week on which they occur;

availability of consultants with the requisite skills in demand by clients;

changes in the pricing of our professional services or those of our competitors;

variation in foreign exchange rates from one quarter to the next used to translate the financial results of our international operations;

the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to management and expansion of our business;

the timing of acquisitions and related costs, such as compensation charges that fluctuate based on the market price of our common stock; and

the periodic fourth quarter consisting of 14 weeks, which occurred during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014 and next occurs during the fiscal year ending May 30, 2020.

Due to these factors, we believe thatquarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not meaningful indicators of future performance. It is possible that in some future periods, our results of operations may be below the expectations of investors. If this occurs, the price of our common stock could decline.

If our internal control over financial reporting does not comply with the requirements of Sarbanes, our business and stock price could be adversely affected.

Section 404 of Sarbanes requires us to evaluate periodically the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of our internal controls as of the end of each fiscal year. Our management report on internal controls is contained in this Annual Report onForm 10-K. Section 404 also requires our independent registered public accountant to report on our internal control over financial reporting.

Our management does not expect our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors or acts of fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, involving us have been, or will be, detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can also be circumvented by individual acts of a person, or by collusion among two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we cannot assure you that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to errors or fraudulent acts may occur and not be detected.

Although our management has determined, and our independent registered public accountant has attested, that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 27, 2017, we cannot assure you that we or our independent registered public accountant will not identify a material weakness in our internal controls in the future. A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting may require management and our independent registered public accountant to evaluate our internal

controls as ineffective. If our internal control over financial reporting is not considered adequate, we may experience a loss of public confidence, which could have an adverse effect on our business and our stock price. Additionally, if our internal control over financial reporting otherwise fails to comply with the requirements of Sarbanes, our business and stock price could be adversely affected.

We may be subject to laws and regulations that impose difficult and costly compliance requirements and subject us to potential liability and the loss of clients.

In connection with providing services to clients in certain regulated industries, such as the gaming, energy and healthcare industries, we are subject to industry-specific regulations, including licensing and reporting requirements. Complying with these requirements is costly and, if we fail to comply, we could be prevented from rendering services to clients in those industries in the future. Additionally, changes in these requirements, or in other laws applicable to us, in the future could increase our costs of compliance.

In addition, we may face challenges from certain state regulatory bodies governing the provision of certain professional services, such as legal services or audit services. The imposition of such regulations could require additional financial and operational burdens on our business.

It may be difficult for a third party to acquire the Company,us, and this could depress our stock price.

Delaware corporate law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a change of control of the Company or our management. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it difficult for you and otherour stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. As a result, these provisions could limit the price that future investors are willing to pay for yourour shares. These provisions:



authorize our board of directors to establish one or more series of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which can be determined by the board of directors at the time of issuance;

·authorize our board of directors to establish one or more series of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which can be determined by the board of directors at the time of issuance

·divide our board of directors into three classes of directors, with each class serving a staggered three-year term. Because the classification of the board of directors generally increases the difficulty of replacing a majority of the directors, it may tend to discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us and may make it difficult to change the composition of the board of directors

·prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors which, if not prohibited, could allow a minority stockholder holding a sufficient percentage of a class of shares to ensure the election of one or more directors

·require that any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing

·state that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board of directors, by our chief executive officer, by the board of directors after a resolution is adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors, or by the holders of not less than 10% of our outstanding voting stock

·establish advance notice requirements for submitting nominations for election to the board of directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at a meeting

·provide that certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws can be amended only by supermajority vote (a 66 2/3 % majority) of the outstanding shares. In addition, our board of directors can amend our bylaws by majority vote of the members of our board of directors

·allow our directors, not our stockholders, to fill vacancies on our board of directors

·provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors



divide our board of directors into three classes of directors, with each class serving a staggered three-year term. Because the classification of the board of directors generally increases the difficulty of replacing a majority of the directors, it may tend to discourage a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us and may make it difficult to change the composition of the board of directors;

prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors which, if not prohibited, could allow a minority stockholder holding a sufficient percentage of a class of shares to ensure the election of one or more directors;

require that any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing;

state that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board of directors, by our chief executive officer, by the board of directors after a resolution is adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors, or by the holders of not less than 10% of our outstanding voting stock;

establish advance notice requirements for submitting nominations for election to the board of directors and for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at a meeting;

provide that certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws can be amended only by supermajority vote (a 66 2/3 % majority) of the outstanding shares. In addition, our board of directors can amend our bylaws by majority vote of the members of our board of directors;

allow our directors, not our stockholders, to fill vacancies on our board of directors; and

provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors.

We are required to recognize compensation expense related to employee stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. There is no assurance that the expense we are required to recognize measures accurately the value of our share-based payment awards and the recognition of this expense could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

We measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based compensation based on estimated values. Thus, our operating results contain anon-cash charge for stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. In general, accounting guidance requires the use of an option-pricing model to determine the value of share-based payment awards. This determination of value is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because our employee stock options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion the existing valuation models may not provide an accurate measure of the value of our employee stock options. Although the value of employee stock options is determined using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.

The terms of our credit facility impose operating and financial restrictions on us, which may limit our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions.

We currently have a $120.0 million secured revolving credit facility which is available through October 21,17, 2021. We are subject to various operating covenants under the credit facility which restrict our ability to, among other things, incur liens, incur additional indebtedness, make certain restricted payments, merge or consolidate and make dispositions of assets. The credit facility also requires us to comply with financial covenants limiting our total funded debt, minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratio. Any failure to comply with these covenants may constitute a breach under the credit facility, which could result in the acceleration of all or a substantial portion of any outstanding indebtedness and termination of revolving credit commitments under the credit facility. Our inability to maintain our credit facility could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our business.

We may be unable to or elect not to pay our quarterly dividend payment.

The Company pays

We currently pay a regular quarterly dividend, subject to quarterly board of director approval. The payment of, or continuation of, the quarterly dividend is at the discretion of our board of directors and is dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business conditions, tax treatment of dividends in the United States, contractual restrictions contained in credit agreements and other agreements and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. We can give no assurance that dividends will be declared and paid in the future. The failure to pay the quarterly dividend, reduction of the quarterly dividend rate or the discontinuance of the quarterly dividend could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

We

Our recent rebranding efforts may not be successful. In addition, we may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, including our brand name. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, the value of such rights may diminish and our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Webelieve establishing, maintaining and enhancing the RGP and Resources Global Professionals brand name is important to our business.  We rely on trademark registrations and common law trademark rights to protect the distinctiveness of our brand. After the end of fiscal year 2019, we launched a significant global rebranding initiative.  However, there can be no assurance that our rebranding initiative will result in a positive return on investment.  In addition, there can be no assurance that the actions we have appliedtaken to establish and protect our trademarks will be adequate to prevent use of our trademarks by others. Further, not all of our trademarks were able to successfully register in all of the desired countries. Accordingly, we may not be able to claim or assert trademark or unfair competition claims against third parties for registrationany number of reasons. For example, a judge, jury or other adjudicative body may find that

14


the conduct of competitors does not infringe or violate our trademark rights. In addition, third parties may claim that the use of our trademarks and branding infringe, dilute or otherwise violate the common law or registered marks of that party, or that our marketing efforts constitute unfair competition. Such claims could result in injunctive relief prohibiting the United Statesuse of our marks, branding and some foreign jurisdictions on certain service marks. On March 29, 2013, we filed a United States trademark application for our RGP service mark and puzzle piece logo, Serial No. 85/890,836marketing activities as well as United States trademark applications on our RGP service mark, puzzle piecesignificant damages, fees and tag line, Serial No. 85/890,838; our RGP Healthcare service markcosts.  If such a claim was made and puzzle piece logo, Serial No. 85/890,839; our RGP Legal service mark and puzzle piece logo, Serial No. 85/890,843; and our RGP Search service mark and puzzle piece logo, Serial No. 85/890,845. We received approval of these applications and registration was granted as of December 2, 2014.

We obtained a United States registration for our Resources Global Professionals service mark, Registration No. 3,298,841, which registered September 25, 2007. However, our rights to this service mark are not currently protected in some of our foreign jurisdictions, and there is no guarantee that any of our pending applications (or any appeals thereof or future applications) will be successful.

We had been aware from time to time of other companies using the name “Resources Connection” or some variation thereof and this contributed to our decision to adopt the operating company name of Resources Global Professionals. We obtained United States registration on our Resources Global Professionals service mark, Registration No. 3,298,841 registered September 25, 2007. However, our rights to this service mark are not currently protected in some of our foreign registrations, and there is no guarantee that any of our pending applications for such registration (or any appeals thereof or future applications) will be successful. Although we are not aware of other companies using the name “Resources Global Professionals” at this time, there could be potential trade name or service mark infringement claims brought against us by the users of these similar names and marks and those users may have service mark rights that are senior to ours. If these claims were successful, we could be forced to cease using the service mark “Resources Global Professionals” even if an infringement claim is not brought against us. It is also possible that our competitors or others will adopt service names similar to ours or that our clients will be confused by another company using a name, service mark or trademark similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity. We cannot assure you that our business would not be adversely affected if confusion did occur or if we were required to change our name.name or any of our marks, the value of our brand may diminish and our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

In 2014, we developed

Reclassification of our independent contractors by foreign tax or regulatory authorities could have an adverse effect on our business model and/or could require us to pay significant retroactive wages, taxes and penalties.

Internationally, our consultants are a software product for the healthcare industry to address enterprise-wide incident managementblend of employees and patient safety issues. We have applied for registrationindependent contractors. Independent contractor arrangements are more common abroad than in the United States due to the labor laws, tax regulations and customs of the international markets we serve. However, changes to foreign laws governing the definition or classification of independent contractors, or judicial decisions regarding independent contractor classification could require classification of consultants as employees. Such reclassification could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations, could require us to pay significant retroactive wages, taxes and penalties, and could force us to change our contractor business model in the service mark for this product. Registration was granted September 9, 2014. On February 13, 2014, we filed a Nonprovisional Application, App. No. H180290, with the United States Patent Office for patent protection for this invention, and we were notified on June 15, 2017 that our application has been approved to issue as a patent. There is no guarantee that third parties may not knowingly or unknowingly infringe our proprietary rights or challenge the proprietary rights held by us. In any or each of these cases, we may be required to expend significant time and expense in order to prevent infringement or to enforce our rights.foreign jurisdictions affected.



ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

15


ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES.

As of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, we maintained 4339 domestic offices, all under operating lease agreements (except for the Irvine, California location), in the following metropolitan areas:

 

Phoenix, Arizona

Atlanta, GeorgiaCincinnati, Ohio

Irvine, California

Phoenix, Arizona

Chicago, Illinois

Honolulu, HawaiiCleveland, Ohio

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Irvine, California

Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois

Nashville, Tennessee

Los Angeles, California (2)

Indianapolis, Indiana

Chicago, IllinoisColumbus, Ohio

Dallas, Texas

Sacramento,

Mountain View, California

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Oakbrook Terrace, IllinoisTulsa, Oklahoma

San Antonio, Texas

Sacramento, California (2)

Kansas City, Missouri

Seattle, Washington

Santa Clara, California

Las Vegas, Nevada

Indianapolis, IndianaPortland, Oregon

Richmond, Virginia

San Diego, California

Parsippany, New Jersey

Boston, MassachusettsCranberry Township, Pennsylvania

San Francisco, California (2)

Detroit, MichiganPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania
Walnut Creek, CaliforniaMinneapolis, MinnesotaPittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Woodland Hills, CaliforniaKansas City, MissouriNashville, Tennessee
Denver, ColoradoLas Vegas, NevadaDallas, Texas
Hartford, ConnecticutParsippany, New JerseyHouston, Texas
Stamford, ConnecticutPrinceton, New JerseySan Antonio, Texas
Fort Lauderdale, Florida

New York, New York

Seattle, Washington

Tampa, Florida

Walnut Creek, California

Charlotte, North Carolina

Woodland Hills, California

Washington, D.C. (McLean, Virginia)

Cleveland, Ohio

Denver, Colorado

Columbus, Ohio

Stamford, Connecticut

Tulsa, Oklahoma

Tampa, Florida

Portland, Oregon

Atlanta, Georgia

Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania

Honolulu, Hawaii

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

As of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, we maintained 2423 international offices under operating lease agreements, located in the following cities and countries:



Sydney, Australia

Milan, ItalyShanghai, People’s Republic of China

Brussels, Belgium

Sydney, Australia

Milan, Italy

Tokyo, JapanManila, Philippines

Singapore

Toronto, Canada

Tokyo, Japan

Seoul, South Korea

Paris, France

Mexico City, Mexico

Singapore

Zurich, Switzerland

Paris, France

Frankfurt, Germany

Amsterdam (Utrecht), Netherlands

Seoul, South Korea

Taipei, Taiwan

Frankfurt,

Muenster, Germany

Oslo, NorwayStockholm, Sweden
Bangalore, India

Beijing, People’s Republic of China

Zurich, Switzerland

London, United Kingdom

Mumbai, India

Munich, Germany

Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

Taipei, Taiwan

Dublin, Ireland

Bangalore, India

Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China

Mumbai, India

London, United Kingdom

Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

Dublin, Ireland

Manila, Philippines

Our corporate offices are located in Irvine, California. We own an approximately 56,20057,000 square foot office building in Irvine, California, of which we occupied approximately 38,00040,000 square feet as of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, including space occupied by our Orange County, California practice. Approximately 18,20013,000 square feet is leased to independent third parties.parties, and 4,000 square feet is vacant. 

 

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings; however, we are a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.

 

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

16


PART II

 

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Price Range of Common Stock

Our

Effective April 2, 2020, we changed our ticker symbol from “RECN” to “RGP” and began trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under this new ticker symbol. We changed our ticker symbol when RGP became available,  as it aligns directly with our trade name, Resources Global Professionals or RGP. Prior to this change in ticker symbol, our common stock hashad traded on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “RECN” since December 15, 2000. Prior to that time, there was no public market forAs of July 8, 2020, the last reported sales price on Nasdaq of our common stock. Thestock was $11.40 per share and the approximate number of holders of record of our common stock as of July 13, 2017 was 4347 (a holder of record is the name of an individual or entity that an issuer carries in its records as the registered holder (not necessarily the beneficial owner) of the issuer’s securities).

The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low intraday sales prices reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for our common stock for the periods indicated.

   Price Range of
Common Stock
 
   High   Low 

Fiscal 2017:

    

First Quarter

  $15.93   $13.79 

Second Quarter

  $17.00   $12.41 

Third Quarter

  $19.80   $15.85 

Fourth Quarter

  $17.40   $12.60 

Fiscal 2016:

    

First Quarter

  $17.12   $14.37 

Second Quarter

  $18.45   $14.65 

Third Quarter

  $18.71   $13.37 

Fourth Quarter

  $15.72   $12.30 

Dividend Policy

Our board of directors has established a quarterly dividend, subject to quarterly board of directors’ approval. Pursuant to declaration and approval by our board of directors, we declared a dividend of $0.11$0.14 per share of common stock during each quarter in fiscal 2017 and $0.102020, $0.13 per share of common stock during each quarter in fiscal 2016.2019, and $0.12 per share of common stock during each quarter in fiscal 2018. On April 20, 2017,15, 2020, our board of directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.11$0.14 per share of our common stock. The dividend was payablepaid on June 15, 201710, 2020 to stockholders of record at the close of business on May 18, 2017.13, 2020. Continuation of the quarterly dividend will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business condition, contractual restrictions contained in our current or future credit agreements and other agreements, and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

Issuances of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In July 2015, our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program (the “July 2015 Program”), authorizing the purchase, at the discretion of our senior executives, of our common stock for an aggregate dollar limit not to exceed $150.0 million. Subject to the aggregate dollar limit, the currently authorized stock repurchase program does not have an expiration date. Repurchases under the program may take place in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to a Rule10b5-1 plan.

DuringThere were no repurchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we did not make any stock repurchases, as indicated in the table below.2020.



Period

  Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
   Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of
Announced
Programs
   Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet be
Purchased Under Announced
Program
 

February 26, 2017—March 25, 2017

   —     $—      —     $125,103,123 

March 26, 2017—April 22, 2017

   —     $—      —     $125,103,123 

April 23, 2017—May 27, 2017

   —     $—      —     $125,103,123 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Total February 26, 2017—May 27, 2017

   —     $—      —     $125,103,123 
  

 

 

     

 

 

   

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the annual percentage change in the cumulative total return to the holders of our common stock with the cumulative total return of the Russell 3000 Index, a customized peer group consisting of teneight companies listed below the following table and a combined classification of companies under Standard Industry Codes as 8742-Management Consulting Services for the five years ended May 27, 2017.30, 2020. The graph assumes $100 was invested at market close on May 26, 201229, 2015 in our common stock and in each index (based on prices from the close of trading on May 26, 2012)29, 2015), and that all dividends are reinvested. Stockholder returns over the indicated period may not be indicative of future stockholder returns.

The information contained in the performance graph shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Companywe specifically incorporatesincorporate it by reference into such filing.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Resources Connection, Inc., the Russell 3000 Index,

SIC Code 8742—Management Consulting and Peer Group



*$100 invested on 5/26/12 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

17

 

   For the Fiscal Years Ended 
   May 26,
2012
   May 25,
2013
   May 31,
2014
   May 30,
2015
   May 28,
2016
   May 27,
2017
 

Resources Connection, Inc.

  $100.00   $92.73   $107.03   $138.15   $140.09   $117.61 

Russell 3000

  $100.00   $128.38   $153.30   $171.47   $171.90   $202.67 

SIC Code 8742—Management Consulting

  $100.00   $147.02   $165.58   $186.17   $205.89   $228.92 

Peer Group

  $100.00   $115.28   $141.66   $146.76   $131.97   $143.07 

The Company’sPicture 3



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



For the Fiscal Years Ended



May 29, 2015

 

May 28, 2016

 

May 27, 2017

 

May 26, 2018

 

May 25, 2019

 

May 30, 2020

Resources Connection, Inc.

$

100.00 

 

$

101.40 

 

$

85.13 

 

$

113.72 

 

$

111.76 

 

$

82.30 

Russell 3000

$

100.00 

 

$

100.25 

 

$

118.19 

 

$

136.28 

 

$

142.80 

 

$

155.05 

SIC Code 8742 - Management Consulting

$

100.00 

 

$

116.93 

 

$

124.98 

 

$

148.25 

 

$

252.99 

 

$

302.85 

Peer Group

$

100.00 

 

$

95.52 

 

$

92.62 

 

$

148.43 

 

$

153.60 

 

$

156.23 

Our customized peer group includes the following teneight professional services companies that we believe reflect the competitive landscape in which the Company operateswe operate and acquiresacquire talent: CRA International, Inc.; FTI Consulting, Inc.; Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.; Hudson Global, Inc.; Huron Consulting Group Inc.; ICF International, Inc.; Kforce, Inc.; Korn/Ferry International;and Korn Ferry. Navigant Consulting, Inc.; and The Advisory Board Company. We have removed The Corporate Executive Board Company from is no longer included in our customized peer group due to its acquisition by Gartner, Inc.Veritas Capital-backed Guidehouse in 2017. The Company’sOctober 2019. Our compensation committee, a committee of our board of directors comprised of independent directors, reviews the composition of the peer group annually to ensure its alignment with the Company’sour size, practice areas, business model delivery and geographic reach.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

You should read the

18


ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following selected historical consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes beginning on page 54in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” and Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginningin Part II of this Annual Report on page 36.Form 10-K. The Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the years ended May 31, 201427, 2017 and May 25, 201328, 2016 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data at May 30, 2015,26, 2018, May 31, 201427, 2017 and May 25, 201328, 2016 were derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements that are not included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K. The Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020,  May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 30, 201526, 2018 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data at May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 201625, 2019 were derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any future periods. The fiscal year ended May 30, 2020 consisted of 53 weeks. All other years presented consisted of 52 weeks.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

May 27,

 

May 28,

  Years Ended 

2020 (1)

 

2019

 

2018 (1)

 

2017

 

2016

  May 27,
2017
 May 28,
2016
 May 30,
2015
 May 31,
2014 (1)
 May 25,
2013
 

(In thousands, except per common share, number of offices and number of consultants)

  (In thousands, except per common share and other data) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

  $583,411  $598,521  $590,589  $567,181  $556,334 

$

703,353 

 

$

728,999 

 

$

654,129 

 

$

583,411 

 

$

598,521 

Direct cost of services, primarily payroll and related taxes for professional services employees

   362,086  366,355  362,227  351,359  342,040 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Gross margin

   221,325  232,166  228,362  215,822  214,294 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   183,471  174,806  173,797  172,531  168,318 

Amortization of intangible assets

   —    90  918  1,688  1,694 

Depreciation expense

   3,452  3,467  3,389  3,628  4,580 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

   34,402  53,803  50,258  37,975  39,702 

$

36,652 

 

$

50,159 

 

$

30,624 

 

$

34,402 

 

$

53,803 

Interest expense

   773   —     —     —     —   

Interest income

   (144 (186 (148 (168 (175
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

   33,773  53,989  50,406  38,143  39,877 

Provision for income taxes

   15,122  23,546  22,898  18,257  19,373 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income

  $18,651  $30,443  $27,508  $19,886  $20,504 

$

28,285 

 

$

31,470 

 

$

18,826 

 

$

18,651 

 

$

30,443 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income per common share:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

  $0.57  $0.82  $0.73  $0.51  $0.50 

$

0.88 

 

$

1.00 

 

$

0.61 

 

$

0.57 

 

$

0.82 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

  $0.56  $0.81  $0.72  $0.51  $0.50 

$

0.88 

 

$

0.98 

 

$

0.60 

 

$

0.56 

 

$

0.81 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

   32,851  37,037  37,825  39,216  41,108 

 

31,989 

 

 

31,596 

 

 

30,741 

 

 

32,851 

 

 

37,037 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

   33,471  37,608  38,248  39,307  41,151 

 

32,227 

 

 

32,207 

 

 

31,210 

 

 

33,471 

 

 

37,608 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

  $0.44  $0.40  $0.32  $0.28  $0.24 

$

0.56 

 

$

0.52 

 

$

0.48 

 

$

0.44 

 

$

0.40 
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Data:

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of offices open at end of year

   67  68  68  68  73 

Total number of consultants on assignment at end of year

   2,569  2,511  2,516  2,401  2,208 

Number of offices at end of year

 

63 

 

73 

 

74 

 

 

67 

 

68 

Number of consultants on assignment at end of year

 

2,495 

 

2,965 

 

3,247 

 

 

2,569 

 

2,511 

Cash dividends paid

  $14,157  $14,085  $11,748  $10,625  $9,497 

$

17,581 

 

$

16,158 

 

$

14,269 

 

$

14,157 

 

$

14,085 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

May 27,

 

May 28,



2020

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016



(Amounts in thousands)

Total assets

$

529,181 

 

$

428,370 

 

$

432,674 

 

$

364,128 

 

$

417,255 

Long-term debt

$

88,000 

 

$

43,000 

 

$

63,000 

 

$

48,000 

 

$

 -

Stockholders' equity

$

303,661 

 

$

282,396 

 

$

268,825 

 

$

238,142 

 

$

342,649 

(1)

The year ended May 31, 2014 consisted

(1)

See Note 3 – Acquisitions and Dispositions in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of 53 weeks. All other years presented consistedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K for discussions on our acquisitions of 52 weeks.Expertence and Veracity during fiscal 2020 and taskforce and Accretive during fiscal 2018.

   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
   May 31,
2014
   May 25,
2013
 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and U.S. government agency securities

  $62,329   $116,046   $112,238   $114,277   $119,012 

Working capital

   95,074    147,704    152,760    150,287    155,844 

Total assets

   364,128    417,255    416,981    420,078    417,640 

Long-term debt

   48,000    —      —      —      —   

Stockholders’ equity

   238,142    342,649    340,452    345,761    352,327 

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” and elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K. See “Forward Looking Statements.”

Overview

RGP is a multinationalglobal consulting firm that provides agile consulting servicesenables rapid business outcomes by bringing together the right people to its global client base who are faced with disruption andcreate transformative change. As a human capital partner for our clients, we specialize in solving today’s most pressing business transformation issues. We bring functional competenciesproblems across the enterprise in the areas of accounting; finance; governance, risktransactions, regulations and compliance management; corporate advisory, strategic communicationstransformations. Our engagements are designed to leverage human connection and restructuring; information management; human capital; supply chain management;collaboration to deliver practical solutions and legalmore impactful results that power our clients’, consultants’ and regulatory. We assistpartners’ success. See Part 1, Item 1 “Business” for further discussions about our business and operations. 

19


Key Transformation Initiatives

Starting in fiscal 2017 and continuing through fiscal 2019, we completed a number of transformative enterprise initiatives including cultivating a more robust sales culture, adopting a new operating model for sales, talent and delivery in North America, refreshing the RGP brand and establishing a digital innovation function focusing on building and commercializing our digital engagement platform and product offerings and enhancing our consulting capabilities in the digital transformation space.

To optimize our sales organization, we aligned our sales process using tools such as Salesforce.com and implemented a new incentive compensation program focused on driving growth in our business with the appropriate metrics. In addition, we expanded our Strategic Client Program, which assigns dedicated account teams to certain high-profile clients with projects requiring specialized expertise in:global operations.



Finance

Under the new operating model in North America, we realigned reporting relationships, largely defined by functional area rather than on an office location basis. We reorganized our Advisory and accounting process transformation and optimization; financial reporting and analysis; technical and operational accounting; merger and acquisition due diligence and integration; audit response; implementation of new accounting standards such as the revenue recognition pronouncement and lease accounting standard; and remediation support

Information management services including program and project management; business and technology integration; data strategy, including governance, security and privacy; and business performance management (such as core planning and consolidation systems)

Corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring services

Governance, risk and compliance management services including contract and regulatory compliance efforts under, for example, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes”); Enterprise Risk Management; internal controls management; and operation and IT audits

Supply chain management services including strategy development; procurement and supplier management; logistics and materials management; supply chain planning and forecasting; and Unique Device Identification compliance

Human capital services including change management; organization development and effectiveness; compensation and incentive plan strategies and design; and optimization of human resources technology and operations

Legal and regulatory services supporting commercial transactions; global compliance initiatives; and law department operations, business strategy and analytics

We were founded in June 1996 byProject Services function, a team at Deloitte,of seller-doer professionals whose primary responsibility is to shepherd sales pursuits and engagement delivery on our more complex projects. We believe this team deepens the scoping conversation, achieves value-oriented pricing and improves delivery management through greater accountability and a more seamless customer experience.

In fiscal 2019, through an extensive brand refresh project led by an outside firm, we adopted a new brand identity focused on our chairman, Donald B. Murray, who was then a senior partnerhuman-centered approach to serving clients and engaging with Deloitte. Our founders created Resources Connection to capitalize on the increasing demand for high quality outsourced professional services. We operated as a part of Deloitte until April 1999. In April 1999, we completed amanagement-led buyout in partnership with several investors. In December 2000, we completed our initial public offering of common stock and began trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market. We currently trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. We operate under the acronym RGP, branding for our operating entity name of Resources Global Professionals.

We operated solely in the United States until fiscal year 2000, when we opened our first three international offices and began to expand geographically to meet the demand for project consulting services across the world. As of May 27, 2017, we served clients from offices in 21 countries, including 24 international offices and 43 offices in the United States. Our global footprint allows the Company to support the global initiatives of our multinational client base.

We expect to continue opportunistic domestic and multinational expansion while also investing in complementary professional services lines that we believe will augment our service offerings.

We primarily charge our clients on an hourly basis for the professional services of our consultants. We recognize revenue once services have been rendered and invoicebelieve the majoritydevelopment of our new brand will support future revenue growth.

Fiscal 2020 Strategic Focus Areas

In fiscal 2020, we continued to strengthen our core by further investing in digital innovation, both organically and through a strategic acquisition, while simultaneously forging ahead in our transformation journey with a deep and global strategic business review.

In July 2019, we acquired Veracity Consulting Group, LLC (“Veracity”), a fast-growing, digital transformation firm based in Richmond, Virginia. This important strategic acquisition allows RGP to offer comprehensive end-to-end digital transformation solutions to clients by combining Veracity’s customer-facing offerings with our depth of experience in back-office solutions. In addition, during fiscal 2020, we continued to invest in our digital engagement platform which is on track to launch in fiscal 2021.

During the United Statesfirst quarter of fiscal 2020, we evaluated certain European markets and determined that we would no longer operate in certain markets based on their client base. As a weekly basis. Someresult, we sold certain assets and liabilities of our clients served by our international offices are billed on a monthly basis. Our clients are contractually obligated to pay us for all hours billed. To a much lesser extent, we also earn revenue if a client hires one of our consultants. This type of contractuallynon-refundable revenue is recognized atforeign subsidiary, Resources Global Professionals Sweden AB (“RGP Sweden”) and exited from the time our client completes the hiring process and represented 0.5% of our revenue for each of the years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015. We periodically review our outstanding accounts receivable balance and determine an estimate of the amount of those receivables we believe may prove uncollectible. Our provision for bad debts, if any, is includedBelgium market, including its wholly own subsidiary in our selling, general and administrative expenses.

The costs to pay our professional consultants and all related benefit and incentive costs, including provisions for paid time off and other employee benefits, are included in direct cost of services. We pay most of our consultants on an hourly basis for all hours worked on client engagements and, therefore, direct cost of services tends to vary directly with the volume of revenue we earn. We expense the benefits we pay to our consultants as they are earned. These benefits include paid time off and holidays; a discretionary bonus plan; subsidized group health, dental and life insurance programs; a matching 401(k) retirement plan; the ability to participate in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”); and professional development and career training. In addition, we pay the related costs of employment, including state and federal payroll taxes, workers’ compensation insurance, unemployment insurance and other costs. Typically, a consultant must work a threshold number of hours to be eligible for all of the benefits. We recognize direct cost of services when incurred.

Selling, general and administrative expenses include the payroll and related costs of our internal managementLuxemburg, as well as generalNorway.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, we further performed a deep and administrative, marketingstrategic review of our global business beginning in North America and recruiting costs. Our salesAsia Pacific, and marketing efforts are led bycommitted to a global restructuring and business transformation plan (the “Plan”), centered on strengthening the business for greater agility and resilience in anticipation of macroeconomic volatility. The Plan consists of two key components: an effort to streamline our management team who are salaried employeesstructure and earn bonuses basedeliminate non-essential positions to focus on operating results forcore solution offerings, improve efficiency and enhance the Company as a whole and each individual’s performance.

The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks, ending on the Saturday in May closest to May 31. Fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 consisted of four 13 week quartersemployee experience; and a totalstrategic rationalization of 52 weeksour physical geographic footprint and real estate spend to focus investment dollars in high growth core markets for greater impact.

Through the remainder of activity for the fiscal year. For fiscal years of 53 weeks (the next of which occurs for fiscal 2020),2020, we completed a reduction in force (“RIF”) pursuant to the first three quarters consistcomponent of 13 weeks eachthe Plan, eliminating 73 positions in North America and Asia Pacific. In connection with the fourth quarter consistRIF, we incurred $3.9 million of 14 weeks.

On April 5, 2017, the Company announced implementation of three strategic initiatives to help improve its performance in cost containment and revenue generation. The initiatives include (1) reducing selling, general and administrative expenses by approximately $7.0 million per year; related to this initiative, the Company took a charge of approximately $2.4 millionemployee termination costs in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, primarily for severance expenses; (2) improving the sales culture and business development process and practices; and (3) redesigning the business model to enhance client offerings.

The first initiative,2020, of which includes a clear and actionable plan for reducing costs in low growth markets, will streamline the Company’s field and back office operations to better match current and anticipated demand in certain geographies. The implementation of this plan will result in a reduction in overhead expenses and head count, and$2.0 million was completedpaid at the end of the fiscal 2017 fourth quarter.

The second priority initiative focuses on driving the sales process on an enterprise level to advance the account development and account penetration and management activities in local markets, and will support a more sophisticated and robust sales culture. The initiative includes four major components: the implementation of Salesforce as a global Customer Relationship Management tool and the alignment of the Company’s sales process, the establishment of an enterprise-wide Business Development function, the creation of a Strategic Client Program dedicated to expanding service and revenue in the Company’s highest level clients and the evolution of the incentive compensation plans to prioritize growth. These transition activities will involve multi-step changes that are expected to take approximately9-15 months to complete.

Finally, the Company’s decision to redesign its operating model2020. An additional $1.7 million is expected to enhance itsbe paid in fiscal 2021.

The real estate component of the Plan, specifically to shrink our real estate footprint by 26% globally through either lease termination or subleasing, has afforded us a head start in managing the impact of the Pandemic. As a result of the work we did in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 preparing for a shift to virtual operations in connection with office closures, we were able to seamlessly pivot to a virtual operating model when the Pandemic hit in March, supported by a robust array of enhanced technical tools which enabled remote work. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, we incurred $1.1 million of non-cash charges relating to lease terminations and other costs associated with exiting the facilities, including $0.6 million in impairment of our operating right-of-use assets and $0.5 million in loss on disposal of fixed assets. We expect to incur additional restructuring charges in fiscal 2021 as we continue to exit certain real estate leases in accordance with the Plan. The exact amount and timing will depend on a number of variables, including market conditions. Given the current macro environment, particularly the current shift away from commercial real estate occupancy, accelerated by the Pandemic, we are seeing challenges in our effort to sublet our real estate facilities. As a result, we believe it could take longer and be more costly to terminate and sublet our leases, therefore taking longer to realize the expected savings.

We expect to realize $10.0 million to $12.0 million of savings in fiscal 2021 as a result of the Plan.

20


All of the employee termination costs and the facility exit costs associated with our restructuring initiatives that we incurred in fiscal 2020 are recorded in selling, general, and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended May 30, 2020.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2021, we started the strategic business review in Europe, and currently expect to substantially complete the review and restructuring in Europe in fiscal 2021.

COVID-19 Impact and Outlook

Since the start of calendar 2020, the COVID-19 virus has spread to many of the countries in which we and our customers conduct business. Governments throughout the world have implemented, and may continue to implement, stay-at-home orders, proclamations and directives aimed at minimizing the spread of the COVID-19 virus. The impact of the Pandemic and the resulting restrictions have caused disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and may continue to disrupt financial markets and global economic activities. We have taken precautions and steps to prevent or reduce infection among our employees, including limiting business travel and mandating working from home in many of the countries in which we operate. While our overall productivity remained high through the end of fiscal 2020, these measures may disrupt our normal business operations and negatively impact our productivity and our ability to efficiently serve our clients. As events relating to COVID-19 continue to develop and evolve globally, there is significant uncertainty as to the full likely effects of the Pandemic, which may, among other things, reduce demand for or delay client offerings, providing insightfuldecisions to procure our services or result in cancellation of existing projects. While the exact impact from the Pandemic is not quantifiable, our results of operations and cash flows were adversely impacted in the latter half of fiscal 2020. During the last 12 non-holiday weeks in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, which started with the week ended March 7, 2020, our average weekly revenue declined 9.1% compared to the first eight non-holiday weeks of the 2020 calendar year. Our number of consultants also decreased from 2,965 as of May 25, 2019 to 2,495 as of May 30, 2020. Due to the disruption of business solutionsoperations in the U.S. and globally, we have also seen some softening in our pipeline globally.  Although we do not expect the Pandemic to have a permanent impact on our business operations, we cannot estimate the length or the magnitude of the Pandemic and how this might affect our customers’ demand for our services and our ability to continue to operate efficiently. We believe the Pandemic could continue to have an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial position in fiscal 2021. We are uncertain whether future effects of the Pandemic will be similar to what we have experienced in fiscal 2020. We continue to monitor relevant business metrics, such as welldaily and weekly revenue run rate, pipeline activities, rate of consultant attrition and days sales outstanding, and have implemented the appropriate modifications to our normal operations. Until we have further visibility into the full impact of the pandemic on the global economy, we will remain focused on the health of our balance sheet and liquidity. We will make prudent decisions to reinvest in the business to drive key growth initiatives in core markets and the expansion of our digital capabilities. We believe the restructuring initiatives that we took in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 have better prepared us to operate with agility and resilience in this challenging economic environment.

Our primary source of liquidity historically has been cash provided by our operations and our $120.0 million secured revolving credit facility (“Facility”) which expires on October 17, 2021. As of May 30, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $95.6 million, and additional availability under our Facility of $30.7 million. During the year ended May 30, 2020, we also continued to generate positive cash flow from operations and we believe the collection and quality of our customer receivables remain strong. Given our balance sheet and liquidity position, we believe we have the financial flexibility and resources needed to operate in the current uncertain economic environment. However, if global economic conditions worsen as industry-leading project execution. For example,a result of the CompanyPandemic, it could materially impact our liquidity position and capital needs, although we believe our variable expense operating model serves to mitigate both operational and liquidity risk. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted in the U.S. in response to the Pandemic. The CARES Act includes, among other things, direct financial assistance to Americans in the form of cash payments to individuals, aid to small businesses in the form of loans, and other tax incentives in an effort to stabilize the U.S. economy and keep Americans employed. We have not filed, and currently do not intend to file, for funding provided by the CARES Act. In the U.S., we have deferred $2.9 million in payroll tax payments through the end of fiscal 2020. We do not believe the income tax provisions such as changes to the net operating loss rules included in the CARES Act will build deeper capabilitieshave a material impact on us. We have not received, and do not expect to receive, significant government-provided relief or stimulus funding in project support for M&A transactions and data governance, security & analytics solutions. The shift will also enable stronger inter-office collaboration and allowother parts of the Company to deliver improved solutions, expertise and talent to all of its clients around the globe, regardless of their location.

world.

Critical Accounting Policies

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)GAAP in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

21


We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The following represents a summary of our critical accounting policies, defined as those policies that we believe: (a) are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and (b) involve inherently uncertain issues that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.

Valuation of long-lived assets — We assess the potential impairment of long-lived tangible and intangible assets periodically or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Our goodwill is not subject to periodic amortization. This asset is considered to have an indefinite life and its carrying value is required to be assessed by us for impairment at least annually. Depending on future market values of our stock, our operating performance and other factors, these assessments could potentially result in impairment reductions of this intangible asset in the future and this adjustment may materially affect the Company’s future financial results and financial condition.

Allowance for doubtful accounts — We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from our clients failing to make required payments for services rendered. We estimate this allowance based upon our knowledge of the financial condition of our clients (which may not include knowledge of all significant events), review of historical receivable and reserve trends and other pertinent information. While such losses have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of our clients could cause unfavorable trends in receivable collections and additional allowances may be required. These additional allowances could materially affect the Company’sour future financial results.

Income taxes — In order to prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to make estimates of income taxes, if applicable, in each jurisdiction in which we operate. The process incorporates an assessment of any current tax exposure together with temporary differences resulting from different treatment of transactions for tax and financial statement purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The recovery of deferred tax assets from future taxable income must be assessed and, to the extent recovery is not likely, we will establish a valuation allowance. An increase in the valuation allowance results in recording additional tax expense and any such adjustment may materially affect the Company’sour future financial result. If the ultimate tax liability differs from the amount of tax expense we have reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, an adjustment of tax expense may need to be recorded and this adjustment may materially affect the Company’sour future financial results and financial condition. We also evaluate our uncertain tax positions and only recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percentage likelihood of being realized upon settlement. We record a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Any change in judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions is recognized in earnings in the period in which such change occurs.

Revenue recognitionWe primarily charge our clients on an hourly basis forRevenues are recognized when control of the professional services of our consultants. We recognize revenue once services have been rendered and invoice the majority ofpromised service is transferred to our clients, in an amount that reflects the United Statesconsideration expected in exchange for the services. Revenue is recorded net of sales or other transaction taxes collected from clients and remitted to taxing authorities. Revenues from contracts are recognized over time, based on a weekly basis. Some of our clients servedhours worked by our international officesprofessionals. The performance of the agreed-upon service over time is the single performance obligation for revenues. Certain clients may receive discounts (for example, volume discounts or rebates) to the amounts billed. These discounts or rebates are billed onconsidered variable consideration. Management evaluates the facts and circumstances of each contract and client relationship to estimate the variable consideration assessing the most likely amount to recognize and considering management’s expectation of the volume of services to be provided over the applicable period. Rebates are the largest component of variable consideration and are estimated using the most likely amount method prescribed by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, contracts terms and estimates of revenue. Revenues are recognized net of variable consideration to the extent that it is probable that a monthly basis. Our clients are contractually obligated to pay us for all hours billed. To a much lesser extent, we also earn revenue if a client hires onesignificant reversal of our consultants. This type of contractuallynon-refundablerevenues will not occur in subsequent periods.  revenue is recognized at the time our client completes the hiring process.

Stock-based compensation — Under our 2014 Performance Incentive Plan, officers, employees, and outside directors have received or may receive grants of restricted stock, stock units, options to purchase common stock or other stock or stock-based awards. Under our ESPP,Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), eligible officers and employees may purchase our common stock in accordance with the terms of the plan.

The Company estimates a

We estimate the fair value for employee stock optionsof share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. We determine the estimated value of restricted stock awards using the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for our stock options and stock-based awards as well as stock issued under our ESPP which takes into account assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Additional variables to be considered are the expected term, expected

dividends and the risk-free interest rate over the expected term of our employee stock options. In addition, because stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures must beare estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience. If facts and circumstances change and we employ different assumptions in future periods, the compensation expense recorded may differ materially from the amount recorded in the current period.

The Company uses its

22


We use our historical volatility over the expected life of the stock option award and ESPP to estimate the expected volatility of the price of itsour common stock. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee stock options. The impact of expected dividends ($0.110.14 per share for each quarter during fiscal 2017 and $0.102020, $0.13 per share for each quarter ofduring fiscal 2016)2019, and $0.12 per share for each quarter during fiscal 2018) is also incorporated in determining the estimated value per share of employee stock option grants.grants and purchases under our ESPP. Such dividends are subject to quarterly board of director approval. The Company’sOur expected life of stock option grants is 5.6 years fornon-officers and 8.1 years for officers. The Company uses its historical volatility overofficers, and the expected life of the stock option award to estimate the expected volatility of the price of its common stock. The Company reviewsgrants under our ESPP is 6 months. We review the underlying assumptions related to stock-based compensation at least annually.annually or more frequently if we believe triggering events exist.

Valuation of long-lived assetsWe baseassess the potential impairment of long-lived tangible and intangible assets periodically or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable from the estimated undiscounted expected future cash flows expected to result from their use and eventual disposition. In cases where the estimated undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than net book value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the amount by which the net book value exceeds the estimated fair value of assets. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment, and our estimatesprojections may vary from the cash flows eventually realized. Future events and unanticipated changes to assumptions could result in an impairment in the future. Although the impairment is a non-cash expense, it could materially affect our future financial results and financial condition. Identifiable intangible assets are amortized over their lives, typically ranging from 17 months to ten years.

Valuation of goodwill – Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired in a business combination. We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually on historical experiencethe last day of the fiscal year, and whenever events indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit could be less than its carrying amount. We operate under one reporting unit resulting from the combination of our practice offices. We early adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-04 Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”) on various other assumptionsMay 26, 2019, the first day of fiscal 2020. ASU 2017-04 eliminates step two of the goodwill impairment test and specifies that are believed togoodwill impairment should be reasonable undermeasured by comparing the circumstances,fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Under ASU 2017-04, we compare the results of which form the basis for making judgments aboutfair value and the carrying value of our reporting unit to assess and measure goodwill impairment. There was no goodwill impairment for fiscal 2020. Depending on future market values of our stock, our operating performance and other factors, the assessment could potentially result in an impairment in the future. Although the impairment is a non-cash expense, it could materially affect our future financial results and financial condition.

Business combinations — We allocate the fair value of the purchase consideration of our acquisitions to the tangible assets, liabilities, and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. Purchase price allocations for business acquisitions require significant judgments, particularly with regards to the determination of value of identifiable assets, liabilities, and goodwill. Often third-party specialists are used to assist in valuations requiring complex estimation. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities. Actualliabilities is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred.

Purchase agreements related to certain business acquisitions may include provisions for the payment of additional cash consideration if certain future performance conditions are met. These contingent consideration arrangements are recognized at their acquisition date fair value and included as part of the purchase price at the acquisition date. These contingent consideration arrangements are classified as accrued liabilities or other long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are remeasured to fair value at each reporting period, with any change in fair value being recognized in the applicable period’s results may differ from theseof operations. Measuring the fair value of contingent consideration at the acquisition date, and for all subsequent remeasurement periods, requires a careful examination of the facts and circumstances to determine the probable resolution of the contingency(ies). The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration is based primarily on our estimates under different assumptions or conditions.of meeting the applicable contingency conditions as per the terms of the applicable agreements. These include estimates of various operating performance and other measures and our assessment of the probability of meeting such results, with the probability-weighted earn-out then discounted to estimate fair value.

23


Results of Operations

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, our Consolidated Statements of Operations data. These historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results.



   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Revenue

  $583,411   $598,521   $590,589 

Direct cost of services

   362,086    366,355    362,227 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross margin

   221,325    232,166    228,362 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   183,471    174,806    173,797 

Amortization of intangible assets

   —      90    918 

Depreciation expense

   3,452    3,467    3,389 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from operations

   34,402    53,803    50,258 

Interest expense

   773    —      —   

Interest income

   (144   (186   (148
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

   33,773    53,989    50,406 

Provision for income taxes

   15,122    23,546    22,898 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $18,651   $30,443   $27,508 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Our operating results for the periods indicated are expressed as a percentage of revenue below. The fiscal year ended May 30, 2020 consisted of 53 weeks. All other fiscal years presented consisted of 52 weeks. 



   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
  May 28,
2016
  May 30,
2015
 

Revenue

   100.0  100.0  100.0

Direct cost of services

   62.1   61.2   61.3 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   37.9   38.8   38.7 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   31.4   29.2   29.4 

Amortization of intangible assets

   —     —     0.2 

Depreciation expense

   0.6   0.6   0.5 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

   5.9   9.0   8.6 

Interest expense

   0.1   —     —   

Interest income

   —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

   5.8   9.0   8.6 

Provision for income taxes

   2.6   3.9   3.9 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

   3.2  5.1  4.7
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

We also assess the results of our operations using EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin. EBITDA is defined as our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA plus stock-based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA Margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by revenue. These measures assist management in assessing our core operating performance. The following table presents EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin for the periods indicated and includes a reconciliation of such measures to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 



May 30,

 

 

 

May 25,

 

 

 

May 26,

 



2020

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

2018

 



 

(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)

 

Revenue

$

703,353 100.0 

%

 

$

728,999 100.0 

%

 

$

654,129 100.0 

%

Direct cost of services

 

427,870 60.8 

 

 

 

446,560 61.3 

 

 

 

408,074 62.4 

 

Gross margin

 

275,483 39.2 

 

 

 

282,439 38.7 

 

 

 

246,055 37.6 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

228,067 32.4 

 

 

 

223,802 30.7 

 

 

 

209,042 32.0 

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

5,745 0.8 

 

 

 

3,799 0.5 

 

 

 

2,298 0.4 

 

Depreciation expense

 

5,019 0.8 

 

 

 

4,679 0.6 

 

 

 

4,091 0.6 

 

Income from operations

 

36,652 5.2 

 

 

 

50,159 6.9 

 

 

 

30,624 4.6 

 

Interest expense, net

 

2,061 0.3 

 

 

 

2,190 0.3 

 

 

 

1,735 0.3 

 

Other income

 

(637)(0.1)

 

 

 

 -

 -

 

 

 

 -

 -

 

Income before provision for income taxes

 

35,228 5.0 

 

 

 

47,969 6.6 

 

 

 

28,889 4.3 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

6,943 1.0 

 

 

 

16,499 2.3 

 

 

 

10,063 1.5 

 

Net income

$

28,285 4.0 

%

 

$

31,470 4.3 

%

 

$

18,826 2.8 

%

Non-GAAP Financial Measures



   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
  May 28,
2016
  May 30,
2015
 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Net income

  $18,651  $30,443  $27,508 

Adjustments:

    

Amortization of intangible assets

   —     90   918 

Depreciation expense

   3,452   3,467   3,389 

Interest expense

   773   —     —   

Interest income

   (144  (186  (148

Provision for income taxes

   15,122   23,546   22,898 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EBITDA

   37,854   57,360   54,565 

Stock-based compensation expense

   6,068   6,280   5,989 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

  $43,922  $63,640  $60,554 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Revenue

  $583,411  $598,521  $590,589 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

   7.5  10.6  10.3
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TheWe use certain non-GAAP financial measures and key performance indicators we use to assess our financial and operating performance abovethat are not defined by, or calculated in accordance with GAAP. Anon-GAAP financial measure is defined as a numerical measure of a company’s financial performance that (i) excludes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding amounts, that are included in the comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in the consolidated statementConsolidated Statements of operations;Operations; or (ii) includes amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of including amounts, that are excluded from the comparable measure so calculated and presented.

Our primary non-GAAP financial measures are listed below and reflect how we evaluate our operating results.

·

Constant currency applied to both GAAP revenue and Non-GAAP revenue, as defined herein, represents the outcome that would have resulted had exchange rates in the reported period been the same as those in effect in the comparable prior period.

·

Organic revenue is calculated as GAAP revenue less revenues from acquired businesses and revenues related to businesses that the Company disposed of either through sale or abandonment.

·

Same day organic revenue is calculated as organic revenue, divided by the number of business days in the current period, multiplied by the number of business days in the comparable prior period. For example, North America organic revenue for fiscal 2020 on the same day basis as fiscal 2019 is calculated as North America organic revenue for fiscal 2020 of $561.4 million divided by the 258 business days in North America in the current year, multiplied by the 254 business days in North America in fiscal 2019. The number of days in each respective year is provided in “Year Ended May 30, 2020 Compared to Year Ended May 29, 2019” below.

·

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as net income before amortization of intangible assets, depreciation expense, interest and income taxes plus stock-based compensation expense, restructuring costs, and plus or minus contingent consideration adjustments.

·

Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by revenue.

24


Organic Revenue and Same Day Organic Revenue

Organic revenue and same day organic revenue assist management in evaluating revenue trends on a more comparable and consistent basis. We believe these measures also provide more clarity to our investors in evaluating our core operating performance and facilitate a comparison of such performance from period to period. The following table presents the organic revenue for the periods indicated and includes a reconciliation of the organic revenue to revenue, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. Amounts are stated in thousands:



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

For the Years Ended

Organic Revenue

 

May 30,

 

May 25,



 

2020

 

2019

Revenue (GAAP)

 

 

(Unaudited)

North America

 

$

580,185 

 

$

593,799 

Asia Pacific

 

 

48,622 

 

 

48,845 

Europe

 

 

74,546 

 

 

86,355 

Total revenue

 

$

703,353 

 

$

728,999 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Less: Impact of Acquisitions and Dispositions

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America (1)

 

$

18,817 

 

$

 -

Asia Pacific

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Europe (2)

 

 

2,712 

 

 

12,136 

Total revenue

 

$

21,529 

 

$

12,136 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Organic Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

$

561,368 

 

$

593,799 

Asia Pacific

 

 

48,622 

 

 

48,845 

Europe

 

 

71,834 

 

 

74,219 

Total revenue

 

$

681,824 

 

$

716,863 



 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Related to Veracity

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2) Related to Nordics and Belgium

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin arenon-GAAP financial measures.assist management in assessing our core operating performance. We also believe that EBITDA,these measures provide investors with useful perspective on underlying business results and trends and facilitate a comparison of our performance from period to period. The following table presents Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin provide useful informationfor the periods indicated and includes a reconciliation of such measures to our investors because they arenet income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 



May 30,

 

 

May 25,

 

 

May 26,

 



2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 



 

(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)

 

Net income

$

28,285 

 

 

$

31,470 

 

��

$

18,826 

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

5,745 

 

 

 

3,799 

 

 

 

2,298 

 

Depreciation expense

 

5,019 

 

 

 

4,679 

 

 

 

4,091 

 

Interest expense, net

 

2,061 

 

 

 

2,190 

 

 

 

1,735 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

6,943 

 

 

 

16,499 

 

 

 

10,063 

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

6,057 

 

 

 

6,570 

 

 

 

6,033 

 

Restructuring costs

 

4,982 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 -

 

Contingent consideration adjustment

 

794 

 

 

 

(590)

 

 

 

 -

 

Adjusted EBITDA

$

59,886 

 

 

$

64,617 

 

 

$

43,046 

 

Revenue

$

703,353 

 

 

$

728,999 

 

 

$

654,129 

 

Adjusted EBITDA Margin

 

8.5 

%

 

 

8.9 

%

 

 

6.6 

%

Our non-GAAP financial measures used by management to assess the core performance of the Company. EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are not measurements of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or construed as substitutes for revenue, net income or other cash flow data prepared in accordance with GAAP

25


for purposes of analyzing our revenue, profitability or liquidity. These measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, revenue, net income, earnings per share, cash flows or other measures of financial performance prepared in conformity with GAAP.

Further, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin have the following limitations:

Although depreciation and amortization arenon-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements;

Equity based compensation is an elementa limitation of our long-term incentive compensation program, although wenon-GAAP financial measures is they exclude it asitems detailed above that have an expense from Adjusted EBITDA when evaluatingimpact on our ongoing operating performance for a particular period; and

GAAP reported results. Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Marginthese non-GAAP financial measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure.

Because of these limitations, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Marginthese non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

Year Ended May 27, 201730, 2020 Compared to Year Ended May 28, 201625, 2019

Amounts are in millions unless otherwise stated. Percentage change computations are based upon amounts in thousands.

Revenue.  Revenue decreased $15.1$25.6 million, or 2.5%3.5%, to $583.4$703.4 million for the year ended May 27, 201730, 2020 from $598.5$729.0 million for the year ended May 28, 2016. We deliver our services to clients, whether multi-national or locally-based, in a similar fashion across the globe. Bill rates25, 2019.  Billable hours decreased 1.7% on averageby 3.3% in fiscal 20172020 as compared to fiscal 2016 and hours worked decreased 0.9%2019, while average bill rate remained relatively consistent between the two periods.  The revenue decrease is partially attributable to reduced business consulting opportunitiesResults in fiscal 2017, including declines2020 consisted of 53 weeks while fiscal 2019 consisted of 52 weeks.

The following table represents revenue, organic revenue, and same day organic revenue for our major geographies across the globe, and the number of business days in services provided to clients in the economically challenged energy sector and inefficiencies in our client penetration efforts in financial services. The timing of efforts to stabilize our client penetration in this industry is uncertain. As presented in the table below,each geography:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



Revenue For the Years Ended

 

 

 



May 30,

 

 

May 25,

 

 

%  

 



2020

 

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

GAAP

(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)

 

 

North America

$

580,185 82.5 

%

 

$

593,799 81.5 

%

(2.3)

%

Europe

 

74,546 10.6 

 

 

 

86,355 11.8 

 

(13.7)

%

Asia Pacific

 

48,622 6.9 

 

 

 

48,845 6.7 

 

(0.5)

%

Total

$

703,353 100.0 

%

 

$

728,999 100.0 

%

(3.5)

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Organic Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

$

561,368 82.3 

%

 

$

593,799 82.8 

%

(5.5)

%

Asia Pacific

 

48,622 7.2 

 

 

 

48,845 6.8 

 

(0.5)

%

Europe

 

71,834 10.5 

 

 

 

74,219 10.4 

 

(3.2)

%

Total revenue

$

681,824 100.0 

%

 

$

716,863 100.0 

%

(4.9)

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same Day Organic Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

552,665 82.4 

%

 

$

593,799 82.8 

%

(6.9)

%

Asia Pacific

 

47,850 7.1 

 

 

 

48,845 6.8 

 

(2.0)

%

Europe

 

70,442 10.5 

 

 

 

74,219 10.4 

 

(5.1)

%

Total revenue

 

670,957 100.0 

%

 

$

716,863 100.0 

%

(6.4)

%



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Business Days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America (1)

 

258 

 

 

 

 

254 

 

 

 

 

Asia Pacific (2)

 

252 

 

 

 

 

248 

 

 

 

 

Europe (2)

 

258 

 

 

 

 

253 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1) This represents the number of business days in the United States.

(2) This represents the number of business days in country or countries in which the revenues are most concentrated within the geography.

North America same day organic revenue increaseddecreased $41.1 million, or 6.9%, in fiscal 2017 in Asia Pacific and Europe but declined2020 compared to fiscal 2019. The average bill rate in North America asimproved by 1.0% compared to the prior fiscal year. Europe same day organic revenue decreased $3.8 million, or 5.1%, in fiscal 2020 compared to fiscal 2016.2019. Asia Pacific same day organic revenue declined by $1.0 million, or 2.0%, in fiscal 2020. The decline of revenue in all geographies in fiscal 2020 reflected the adverse impact of the Pandemic and particularly in North America, the wind-down of project revenue related to lease accounting implementation and other large projects.

The number

26


Our financial results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the United States dollar. Revenues denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the endmonthly average exchange rates in effect during each period. Thus, as the value of fiscal 2017 was 2,569 comparedthe United States dollar strengthens relative to the 2,511 consultants engaged atcurrencies of our non-United States based operations, our translated revenue (and expenses) will be lower; conversely, if the endvalue of the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the currencies of our non-United States operations, our translated revenue (and expenses) will be higher. Using the comparable fiscal 2016 (the2019 conversion rates, which we believe provides a more comprehensive view of trends in our business, our same day organic revenue decreased by 6.0% on an overall global basis during fiscal 2020. By geography, using comparable fiscal 2019 conversion rates, our same day organic revenue decreased by 6.9%, 2.1% and 1.3% in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific, respectively. Overall average number of consultants assigned was 2,487bill rates increased 0.4% on a constant currency basis in fiscal 2017 compared to 2,503 in fiscal 2016).2020.

We operated 67 offices (24 abroad) as of May 27, 2017 and 68 offices (23 abroad) as of May 28, 2016.

Our clients do not sign long-term contracts with us. As such, there can be no assurance as to future demand levels for the services that we provide or that future results can be reliably predicted by considering past trends.

Revenue forThe number of consultants on assignment at the Company’s major geographies acrossend of fiscal 2020 was 2,495 compared to 2,965 at the globe consistedend of the following (dollars in thousands):fiscal 2019.



   Revenue for the
For the Years Ended
      % of Total 
   May 27,
      2017      
   May 28,
      2016      
   %
Change
  May 27,
2017
  May 28,
2016
 

North America

  $479,263   $499,229    (4.0)%   82.1  83.4

Europe

   60,461    57,714    4.8  10.4   9.6 

Asia Pacific

   43,687    41,578    5.1  7.5   7.0 
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $583,411   $598,521    (2.5)%   100.0  100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Our financial results are subjectDirect Cost of Services.  Direct cost of services decreased $18.7 million, or 4.2%, to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the United States dollar (“U.S. dollar”). Revenues denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the monthly average exchange rates in effect during each period. Thus, as the value of the United States dollar strengthens relative to the currencies of ournon-United States based operations, our translated revenue (and expenses) will be lower; conversely, if the value of the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the currencies of ournon-United States operations, our translated revenue (and expenses) will be higher. Using the comparable fiscal 2016 conversion rates, international revenues would have been higher than reported under GAAP by $3.5$427.9 million for the year ended May 27, 2017. Using these constant currency rates, which we believe provides a more comprehensive view of trends in our business, our revenue increased by 3.8% in Asia Pacific and by 10.4% in Europe, but decreased by 3.8% in North America and by 1.9% overall. Average bill rates were about the same on a constant currency basis.

Direct Cost of Services. Direct cost of services decreased $4.3 million, or 1.2%, to $362.130, 2020 from $446.6 million for the year ended May 27, 2017 from $366.4 million for the year ended May 28, 2016. Comparing fiscal 201725, 2019. The decrease is primarily due to fiscal 2016, direct cost of services decreased primarily because of a 0.9%3.3% decrease in billable hours workedbetween the two periods and a 1.7%0.2% decrease in the average consultant pay rate per hour. The directrates from fiscal 2019 to fiscal 2020.

Direct cost of services as a percentage of revenue (“directwas 60.8% and 61.3% during fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, respectively. Direct cost of services percentage”) was 62.1% and 61.2% for the years ended May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively. Comparing the two fiscal years, the direct costas a percentage of services percentage increased because of an unfavorable changerevenue improved in the bill ratecurrent period primarily attributable to lower passthrough revenue from client reimbursement and a slight improvement in the bill/pay rate ratio.  The stronger U.S. dollar against most of the currencies of the international countries in which we operate during fiscal 2017 affected our average pay rate. Average pay rates were about the same on a constant currency basis.

Our target direct cost of services percentage is 60% for all of our offices.markets.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“S, G & A”SG&A”). S, G & A  SG&A increased $8.7$4.3 million, or 5.0%1.9%, to $183.5$228.1 million for the year ended May 27, 201730, 2020 from $174.8$223.8 million for the year ended May 28, 2016 and increased25, 2019. SG&A in fiscal 2020 reflected one extra week of activities as compared to fiscal 2019. SG&A as a percentage of revenue to 31.4%increased from 30.7% in fiscal 2017 from 29.2%2019 to 32.4% in fiscal 2016. Management2020. The increase in SG&A is primarily due to the following: (1) $5.0 million of restructuring costs incurred in fiscal 2020, including $3.9 million in personnel-related costs, and administrative head count was 732 and 772 at the end of fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company announced a restructuring program, reducing front and back office personnel by 49 and closing one U.S.-based location and one international location. The approximate cost of the program was $2.4 million, which is included in S, G & A for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. Fiscal 2017 S, G & A also includes severance of approximately $1.1 million in real estate exit related costs; (2) a  $2.9 million increase in management compensation andnon-cash bonuses and commissions partially driven by the one extra week in fiscal 2020; and (3) a  change in contingent consideration related expense/benefit over the two periods, which was an expense of $0.8 million in fiscal 2020 as compared to a benefit of $0.6 million in fiscal 2019. The increase in SG&A was partially offset by the following: (1) $2.5 million of savings in general business expenses, primarily attributable to cost containment measures and reduced business travel during the Pandemic; (2)  a $1.7 million decrease in internal consultants costs as we continue to leverage our existing resources more efficiently on various projects and initiatives; and (3) a $0.5 million decrease in stock-based compensation expenseexpense.  

Amortization and Depreciation Expense.  Amortization of approximately $400,000 related to the accelerated vesting of options previously granted to a senior executive in connection with his departure from the Company. S, G & A in fiscal 2016 includes additionalnon-cash stock-based compensation expense of approximately $900,000 related to the accelerated vesting of options previously granted to Donald Murray in connection with his transition from Executive Chairman to Chairman. Absent these costs, S, G & A increased byintangible assets was $5.7 million in fiscal 2017 as2020 compared to $3.8 million in fiscal 2019. The increase is primarily due to the same prior year period; the primary cause of this increaseamortization related to identifiable intangible assets acquired through Veracity. Depreciation expense was investments$5.0 million and $4.7 million in the Company’s managing consultant programfiscal 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Interest Expense, net.  Net interest expense for fiscal 2020, including commitment fees, was approximately $2.1 million in fiscal 2020 compared to provide more specific skill sets$2.2 million in fiscal 2019. The decrease was due to address evolving client needs and business development professionalsa lower average interest rate in United States offices with high growth potential. In addition, the Company engaged external assistance on the transformation of its sales process and tools during the second half of fiscal of 2017, incurring consulting fees of approximately $1.3 million. These increased costs were partially offset2020 as compared to the prior year by a decrease in marketing related costsfiscal year. Interest income was $0.1 million and provision for uncollectable accounts. S, G & A$0.3 million in fiscal 2017 was favorably impacted by $1.1 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared primarily to the Euro, Swedish Kronor2020 and British Pound.2019, respectively.

Sequential Operations. On a sequential quarter basis, fiscal 2017 fourth quarter revenue increased 3.3% to $148.6 million from $143.8 million, hours worked improved 1.4% and bill rates were up 1.7%. The Company’s sequential revenue increased in North America (2.5%), Europe (11.5%), and Asia Pacific (1.4%); using the comparable third quarter fiscal 2017 conversion rates, consolidated sequential revenue increased 3.0% and in North America (2.4%) and Europe (9.7%), but was down in Asia Pacific(-0.1%). Third quarter revenue was impacted by the Christmas, New Year’s and Chinese New Year’s holidays; there were no significant holidays in the fourth quarter.

The direct cost of services percentage improved from 63.7% in the third quarter to 61.0% in the fourth quarter. This improvement is primarily attributable to no compensated holidays in the United States during the fourth quarter compared to two in the third quarter, the declining impact of payroll taxes as the calendar year progresses and an improvement in the Company’s cost of its self-insured medical coverage of consultants.

S, G & A expenses increased $3.0 million from the quarter ended February 25, 2017 to the quarter ended May 27, 2017. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company initiated and completed a restructuring program, reducing front and back office personnel by 49 and closing one U.S. based location and one international location. The approximate cost of the program was $2.4 million, which is included in S, G & A for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. Absent these costs, S, G & A increased by $0.6 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 as compared to the same prior year period. The increase was primarily a result of the consulting spend related to the Company’s transformation of its sales process and tools during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, incurring fees of approximately $1.0 million, offset by the declining impact of payroll taxes as the calendar year progresses. The leverage of S, G & A expenses improved to 30.9% (32.6% including severance costs) in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to 31.5% in the third quarter. This was attributable to the improved revenue in the fourth quarter, providing leverage on certain fixed expenses, such as rent, in the fourth quarter.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense.Depreciation expense was $3.5 million for both fiscal 2017 and 2016. Depreciation on newly acquired property and equipment during fiscal 2017 was offset by the completion of depreciation on certain assets during the year.

Amortization of intangible assets was $90,000 in fiscal 2016. All of the Company’s intangible assets (other than goodwill) were fully amortized as of the end of fiscal 2016.

Interest Expense (Income). As described further below under the captionLiquidity and Capital Resources, the Company entered into a $120 million secured revolving credit facility (“Facility”) with Bank of America in October 2016. The Facility is available for working capital and general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions and stock repurchases. On November 21, 2016, the Company completed its Dutch auction tender offer, purchasing approximately 6.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock for approximately $104.2 million, excluding transaction costs, funded partially by borrowing $58.0 million under the Facility and $46.2 million of cash on hand. Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at a rate per annum of either, at the Company’s option, (i) a LIBOR rate defined in the Facility plus a margin of 1.25% or 1.50% or (ii) an alternate base rate, plus margin of 0.25% or 0.50% with the applicable margin depending on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. The alternate base rate is the highest of (i) Bank of America’s prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.0%. The Company also pays an unused commitment fee on the average daily unused portion of the Facility at a rate of 0.15% to 0.25%, depending upon our leverage ratio.

Total interest expense for fiscal 2017, including commitment fees, was approximately $773,000. The Company incurred no interest expense during fiscal 2016. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company repaid $10.0 million on the Facility and had outstanding borrowings of $49.0 million as of May 27, 2017, including outstanding letters of credit of $1.0 million. As of May 27, 2017, the interest rate on the Company’s borrowings was 2.5% on one tranche of $24.0 million based on a1-month LIBOR plus 1.5% and 2.65% on a second tranche of $24.0 million based on a3-month LIBOR plus 1.5%.

The Company’s interest income was $144,000 during fiscal 2017 compared to $186,000 for fiscal 2016. Although rates improved generally during fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016, interest income declined between the two periods as a result of the use of cash in the Dutch auction tender offer in November 2016, reducing amounts available for investment for the remainder of the fiscal year.

Income Taxes.   The provision for income taxes was $6.9 million and $16.5 million in fiscal 2020 and 2019, respectively. The effective tax rate decreased from 34.4% in fiscal 2019 to $15.119.7% in fiscal 2020. The decrease in the provision for income taxes from the prior year was primarily due to a fiscal 2020 deduction related to a worthless stock loss in our investment in our wholly owned subsidiaries. During fiscal 2020, after analyzing the facts and circumstances, we determined to no longer invest in the Belgium, Luxembourg and the Nordics markets which includes Sweden and Norway. We have maintained a permanent investment position and, therefore, have not previously recorded a deferred tax asset for the basis differences of these entities. The financial results of these entities created an excess of tax basis over the book basis in which the worthless stock that was deducted for income tax purposes equal to approximately $25.8 million, (effective rateresulting in an estimated net tax benefit of $6.6 million. We analyzed these transactions and determined that these worthless stock deductions qualify as ordinary losses.  In addition, we took a deduction relating to worthless loans of approximately 45%$4.4 million, which is also treated as an ordinary loss, resulting in a net tax benefit of $0.8 million after the offset of the estimated global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) tax. While we believe this is a valid income tax deduction, due to the controversial nature of worthless loan deductions, we have determined this tax benefit to be an uncertain tax position. Accordingly, we fully reserved for the year ended May 27, 2017tax benefit associated with the worthless loan deduction. The reserve includes offsetting the federal and state benefits, by the estimated GILTI tax increase. The deductions for worthless stock and worthless loans decreased the effective tax rate for fiscal 2020 by 17.4%. These reductions were partially offset by new valuation allowances set up on some of our foreign deferred tax assets based on a review of earnings trends in connection with the adverse impact from $23.5 million (effective ratethe Pandemic.

27


The provision for taxes in both fiscal 20172020 and fiscal 20162019 resulted from taxes on income from operations in the United States and certain other foreign jurisdictions, a lower benefit for losses in certain foreign jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the United States statutory rates, and no benefit for losses in jurisdictions in which a valuation allowance on operating loss carryforwards had previously been established. The decrease in the provision for income taxes is because of lower U.S. pretax income. The effective tax rate increased because of lower U.S. pretax income in fiscal 2017 partially offset by lower international pretax losses. The effective tax rate in both fiscal years disproportionately magnifies the effect of the components of the tax rate that differ from the standard federal rate, includingnon-deductible permanent differences and incentive stock options (“ISOs”). Based upon current economic circumstances, management will continue to monitor the need to record additional or release existing valuation allowances in the future, primarily related to certain foreign jurisdictions. Realization of the currently reserved foreign deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient future taxable income in those foreign territories.

Periodically, the Company reviewswe review the components of both book and taxable income to analyze the adequacy of the tax provision. There can be no assurance that the Company’sour effective tax rate will remain constant in the future because of the lower benefit from the United States statutory rate for losses in certain foreign jurisdictions, the limitation on the benefit for losses in jurisdictions in which a valuation allowance for operating loss carryforwards has previously been established, and the unpredictability of timing and the amount of eligible disqualifying ISOincentive stock options (“ISO”) exercises.

The Company cannot recognize a tax benefit for certain ISO grants unless and until the holder exercises his or her option and then sells the shares within a certain period of time. In addition, the Company can only recognize a potential tax benefit for employees’ acquisition and subsequent sale of shares purchased through the ESPP if the sale occurs within a certain defined period. As a result, the Company’s provision for income taxes is likely to fluctuate from these factors for the foreseeable future. Further, those tax benefits associated with ISO grants fully vested at the date of adoption of the current accounting rules governing stock awards will be recognized as additions topaid-in capital when and if those options are exercised and not as a reduction to the Company’s tax provision. The Company recognized a benefit of approximately $2.1 million related to stock-based compensation for nonqualified stock options expensed and for eligible disqualifying ISO exercises during both fiscal 2017 and 2016. The proportion of expense related tonon-qualified stock option grants (for which the Company may recognize a tax benefit in the same quarter as the related compensation expense in most instances) is significant as compared to expense related to ISOs (including ESPPs). However, the timing and amount of eligible disqualifying ISO exercises cannot be predicted. The Company predominantly grants nonqualified stock options to employees in the United States.

The Company hasWe have maintained a position of being indefinitely reinvested in itsour foreign subsidiaries’ earnings by not expecting to remit foreign earnings in the foreseeable future. Being indefinitely reinvested does not require a deferred tax liability to be recognized on the foreign earnings. Management’s indefinite reinvestment position is supported by:



1)

·

RGP in the United States has generated more than enough cash to fund operations and expansion, including acquisitions. RGP uses its excess cash to, at its discretion, return cash to shareholders through dividend payments and stock repurchases.



2)

·

RGP in the United States has no debt or any other current or known obligations that require cash to be remitted from foreign subsidiaries.



3)

·

Management’s growth objectives include allowing cash to accumulate in RGP’s profitable foreign subsidiaries with the expectation of finding strategic expansion plans to further penetrate RGP’s most successful locations.



4)

·

The consequences of distributing foreign earnings have historically been deemed to be tax inefficient for RGP or not materially beneficial.

Year Ended May 28, 201625, 2019 Compared to Year Ended May 30, 201526, 2018

Percentage change computations are based upon amounts in thousands.

Revenue. Revenue increased $7.9 million, or 1.3%, to $598.5 millionFor a comparison of our results of operations for the fiscal years ended May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2018, see Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2016 from $590.6 million for25, 2019, filed with the year ended May 30, 2015. We deliver our services to clients, whether multi-national or locally -ased, in a similar fashion across the globe. In fiscal 2016, revenue increased in North America and Asia Pacific but declined in Europe as compared to fiscal 2015 as noted in the table below. Bill rates increased 0.8%SEC on average in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, while hours worked increased 1.4% over the same period. During fiscal 2016, revenue declined with certain clients in the energy services industries due to theon-going turmoil in the energy market, primarily in the U.S. The timing of stabilization with clients in this industry is uncertain.

The number of consultants on assignment at the end of fiscal 2016 was 2,511 compared to the 2,516 consultants engaged at the end of fiscal 2015 (the average number of consultants assigned was 2,503 in fiscal 2016 compared to 2,487 in fiscal 2015)July 19, 2019 (File No. 0-32113).

We operated 68 offices (23 abroad) at both May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015. Our clients do not sign long-term contracts with us. As such, there can be no assurance as to future demand levels for the services that we provide or that future results can be reliably predicted by considering past trends.

Revenue for the Company’s major geographies across the globe consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):



   Revenue for the Years Ended      % of Total 
   May 28,
      2016      
   May 30,
      2015      
   %
Change
  May 28,
2016
  May 30,
2015
 

North America

  $499,229   $492,207    1.4  83.4  83.3

Europe

   57,714    59,350    (2.8)%   9.6   10.1 

Asia Pacific

   41,578    39,032    6.5  7.0   6.6 
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $598,521   $590,589    1.3  100.0  100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

  

 

 

 

Our financial results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates

28


Table of foreign currencies in relation to the United States dollar. Revenues denominated in foreign currencies are translated into United States dollars at the monthly average exchange rates in effect during each period. Thus, if the value of the United States dollar strengthens relative to the currencies of ournon-United States based operations, our translated revenue (and expenses) will be lower. Using the comparable fiscal 2015 conversion rates, international revenues would have been higher than reported under GAAP by $8.9 million for the year ended May 28, 2016. Using these constant currency rates, which we believe provides a more comprehensive view of our business, our revenue increased by 1.8% in North America, by 6.0% in Europe, by 11.4% in Asia Pacific and by 2.9% overall.Contents

The stronger U.S. dollar against most of the currencies of the international countries in which we operate during fiscal 2016 affected our average bill rate. Using the comparable fiscal 2015 conversion rates, the average bill rate would have increased 1.7% in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015.

Direct Cost of Services. Direct cost of services increased $4.2 million, or 1.2%, to $366.4 million for the year ended May 28, 2016 from $362.2 million for the year ended May 30, 2015. Comparing fiscal 2016 to fiscal 2015, direct cost of services increased primarily because of a 1.4% increase in hours worked, while the average consultant pay rate per hour was the same in both years. The direct cost of services percentage was 61.2% and 61.3% for the years ended May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015, respectively. Comparing the two fiscal years, there were no significant differences in the components comprising the direct cost of services percentage. The stronger U.S. dollar against most of the currencies of the international countries in which we operate during fiscal 2016 affected our average pay rate. Using the comparable fiscal 2015 conversion rates, the average pay rate would have increased 1.7% in fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015.

Our target direct cost of services percentage is 60% for all of our offices.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. S, G & A increased $1.0 million, or 0.6%, to $174.8 million for the year ended May 28, 2016 from $173.8 million for the year ended May 30, 2015. However, S, G & A decreased as a percentage of revenue from 29.4% in fiscal 2015 to 29.2% in fiscal 2016. Management and administrative head count was 772 at the end of fiscal 2016 and 742 at the end of fiscal 2015. S, G & A for the year ended May 28, 2016 includes additionalnon-cash stock-based compensation expense of approximately $900,000 related to the accelerated vesting of options previously granted to Donald Murray in connection with his transition from Executive Chairman to Chairman. During fiscal 2016, compensation and related benefit costs increased, attributable to headcount additions in U.S. and Asia Pacific in offices experiencing growth; and the Company increased its reserve for uncollectable accounts by $1.1 million. These costs were offset as compared to the prior year by a decrease in severance charges related to our European operations and decreases in othernon-cash stock-based compensation expense. S, G & A in fiscal 2016 was favorably impacted by $3.0 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar compared primarily to the Euro, Swedish Kronor and British Pound.

Sequential Operations. On a sequential quarter basis, fiscal 2016 fourth quarter revenue increased 3.9% to $152.5 million from $146.8 million, hours worked improved 2.8% and bill rates were up 0.8%. The Company’s sequential revenue increased in North America (3.1%), Europe (11.7%), and Asia Pacific (2.8%); using the comparable third quarter fiscal 2016 conversion rates, sequential revenue increased in North America (3.1%) and Europe (9.5%), but was down in Asia Pacific(-0.7%). Third quarter revenue was impacted by the Christmas, New Year’s and Chinese New Year’s holidays; there were no significant holidays in the fourth quarter.

The direct cost of services percentage improved from 62.6% in the third quarter to 60.1% in the fourth quarter. This improvement is primarily attributable to no compensated holidays in the United States during the fourth quarter compared to two in the third quarter, the declining impact of payroll taxes as the calendar year progresses and an improvement in the Company’s cost of its self-insured medical coverage of consultants.

S, G & A expenses increased $1.0 million from the quarter ended February 27, 2016 to the quarter ended May 28, 2016, primarily as a result of the increased spending for marketing programs, offset by the declining impact of payroll taxes as the calendar year progresses and improvement in the Company’s cost of self-insured medical coverage for employees. The leverage of S, G & A expenses improved to 29.1% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 compared to 29.5% in the third quarter. This was attributable to the improved revenue in the fourth quarter, which provided leverage on certain fixed expenses, such as rent, in the fourth quarter.

Amortization and Depreciation Expense.Amortization of intangible assets decreased from $918,000 in fiscal 2015 to $90,000 in fiscal 2016. During fiscal 2016, the Company completed amortization of all of its intangible assets.

Depreciation expense increased from $3.4 million for the year ended May 30, 2015 to $3.5 million for the year ended May 28, 2016.

Interest Income. Interest income increased to $186,000 in fiscal 2016 compared to $148,000 in fiscal 2015. The increase in interest income is the result of improved rates on amounts available for investment in fiscal 2016. The Company has invested available cash in certificates of deposit and money market investments that have been classified as cash equivalents due to the short maturities of these investments. As of May 28, 2016, the Company had $25.0 million of investments in commercial paper and U.S. Government Agency securities with remaining maturity dates between three months and one year from the balance sheet date which are classified as short-term investments and considered“held-to-maturity” securities.

Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased from $22.9 million (effective rate of 45.4%) for the year ended May 30, 2015 to $23.5 million (effective rate of 43.6%) for the year ended May 28, 2016. The provision for taxes in both fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2015 resulted from taxes on income from operations in the United States and certain other foreign jurisdictions, a lower benefit for losses in certain foreign jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the United States statutory rates, and no benefit for losses in jurisdictions in which a valuation allowance on operating loss carryforwards had previously been established. The increase in the provision for income taxes is because of higher pretax income. The effective tax rate decreased because of higher U.S. pretax income coupled with lower international pretax losses. Decreased losses from countries with valuation allowances allow the tax expense to be spread over a higher pretax base, which lowers the effective tax rate.

Quarterly Results

The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly Consolidated Statements of Operations data for each of the eight quarters in thetwo-year period ended May 27, 2017.30, 2020. In the opinion of management, this data has been prepared on a basis substantially consistent with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this document, and includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the data. The quarterly data should be read together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this document. The operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any future period.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarters Ended

May 30,

 

Feb. 22,

 

Nov. 23,

 

Aug. 24,

 

May 25,

 

Feb. 23,

 

Nov. 24,

 

Aug. 25,

 Quarters Ended 

2020 (1)

 

2020

 

2019

 

2019

 

2019

 

2019

 

2018

 

2018

 May 27,
2017
 Feb. 25,
2017
 Nov. 26,
2016
 Aug. 27,
2016
 May 28,
2016
 Feb. 27,
2016
 Nov. 28,
2015
 Aug. 29,
2015
 

(In thousands, except net income per common share)

 (In thousands, except net income per common share) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 $148,620  $143,844  $147,558  $143,389  $152,515  $146,779  $150,887  $148,340 

$

178,569 

 

$

168,052 

 

$

184,507 

 

$

172,225 

 

$

182,144 

 

$

179,498 

 

$

188,799 

 

$

178,558 

Direct cost of services, primarily payroll and related taxes for professional services employees

 90,579  91,597  91,048  88,862  91,616  91,851  92,011  90,877 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Direct cost of services, primarily

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

payroll and related taxes for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

professional services employees

 

106,386 

 

 

106,632 

 

 

110,130 

 

 

104,722 

 

 

109,188 

 

 

111,587 

 

 

115,378 

 

 

110,407 

Gross margin

 58,041  52,247  56,510  54,527  60,899  54,928  58,876  57,463 

 

72,183 

 

 

61,420 

 

 

74,377 

 

 

67,503 

 

 

72,956 

 

 

67,911 

 

 

73,421 

 

 

68,151 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 48,425  45,376  46,056  43,614  44,360  43,318  43,171  43,957 

Selling, general and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

administrative expenses

 

62,035 

 

 

55,299 

 

 

53,755 

 

 

56,978 

 

 

56,890 

 

 

55,587 

 

 

54,959 

 

 

56,366 

Amortization of intangible assets

  —     —     —     —     —    30  30  30 

 

1,592 

 

 

1,549 

 

 

1,510 

 

 

1,094 

 

 

944 

 

 

948 

 

 

952 

 

 

955 

Depreciation expense

 941  909  808  794  861  867  881  858 

 

1,106 

 

 

1,120 

 

 

1,424 

 

 

1,369 

 

 

1,250 

 

 

1,163 

 

 

1,197 

 

 

1,069 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income from operations

 8,675  5,962  9,646  10,119  15,678  10,713  14,794  12,618 

 

7,450 

 

 

3,452 

 

 

17,688 

 

 

8,062 

 

 

13,872 

 

 

10,213 

 

 

16,313 

 

 

9,761 

Interest expense

 358  351  64   —     —     —     —     —   

Interest income

 (18 (16 (40 (70 (68 (52 (34 (32
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

 8,335  5,627  9,622  10,189  15,746  10,765  14,828  12,650 

Provision for income taxes

 3,898  2,743  3,930  4,551  7,069  4,808  6,152  5,517 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

535 

 

 

493 

 

 

551 

 

 

482 

 

 

461 

 

 

595 

 

 

608 

 

 

526 

Other income

 

(100)

 

 

 -

 

 

(537)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Income before income tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

expense (benefit)

 

7,015 

 

 

2,959 

 

 

17,674 

 

 

7,580 

 

 

13,411 

 

 

9,618 

 

 

15,705 

 

 

9,235 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

2,948 

 

 

(3,983)

 

 

5,337 

 

 

2,641 

 

 

4,042 

 

 

3,822 

 

 

5,141 

 

 

3,494 

Net income

 $4,437  $2,884  $5,692  $5,638  $8,677  $5,957  $8,676  $7,133 

$

4,067 

 

$

6,942 

 

$

12,337 

 

$

4,939 

 

$

9,369 

 

$

5,796 

 

$

10,564 

 

$

5,741 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net income per common share (1):

        

Net income per common share (2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 $0.15  $0.10  $0.16  $0.16  $0.24  $0.16  $0.23  $0.19 

$

0.13 

 

$

0.22 

 

$

0.39 

 

$

0.16 

 

$

0.30 

 

$

0.18 

 

$

0.33 

 

$

0.18 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diluted

 $0.15  $0.09  $0.16  $0.15  $0.23  $0.16  $0.23  $0.19 

$

0.13 

 

$

0.21 

 

$

0.38 

 

$

0.15 

 

$

0.29 

 

$

0.18 

 

$

0.33 

 

$

0.18 
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 



(1)Net income per common share calculations for each of the quarters were based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding for each period, and the sum of the quarters may not necessarily be equal to the full year net income per common share amount.

(1) Fiscal quarter ended May 30, 2020 consisted of 14 weeks. All other quarters presented consisted of 13 weeks.  

(2) Net income per common share calculations for each of the quarters were based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding for each period, and the sum of the quarters may not necessarily be equal to the full year net income per common share amount.

Our quarterly results have fluctuated in the past and we believe they will continue to do so in the future. Certain factors that could affect our quarterly operating results are described in Part I, Item 1A.1A “Risk Factors.” Due to these and other factors, we believe thatquarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations are not meaningful indicators of future performance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary source of liquidity is cash provided by our operations, and ability to access our Facility$120.0 million secured revolving credit facility with Bank of America (the “Facility”) and, historically to a lesser extent, stock option exercises and ESPP purchases. On an annual basis, we have generated positive cash flows from operations since inception, and we continued to do so for the year ended May 27, 2017.30, 2020. Our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations in the future will be, at least in part, dependent on continued improvement instable global economic conditions.conditions and our ability to remain resilient during economic downturns, such as the one we are currently in caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic. As of May 27, 2017, the Company30, 2020, we had $62.3$95.6 million of cash and cash equivalents.equivalents including $31.7 million held in international operations.

In

We entered into the Facility in October 2016, we entered into a $120 million Facility with Bank of America. The Facilitywhich is available for working capital and general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions and stock repurchases. The Facility allows the Companyus to choose the interest rate applicable to advances. Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at a rate per annum of either, at the Company’s

our option, (i) a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) defined in the FacilityLIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% or 1.50% or (ii) an alternate base rate, plus margin of 0.25% or 0.50% with the applicable margin depending on the Company’sour consolidated leverage ratio. The alternate base rate is the highest of (i) Bank of America’s prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.0%. The Company paysWe pay an unused commitment fee on the average daily unused portion of the Facility at a rate of 0.15% to 0.25% depending upon on the Company’sour consolidated leverage ratio. The Facility expires on October 17, 2021.

The Facility contains both affirmative and negative covenants. We were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Facility as of May 30, 2020 and do not expect material uncertainties in our continued ability to be in compliance with all financial covenants through the remaining term of the Facility. As of May 27, 2017, the Company had30, 2020,

29


our borrowings of approximately $48.0 million underon the Facility were $88.0 million, and directed Bank of America to issue approximately $1.0we had $1.3 million of outstanding letters of credit for the benefit of third parties related to operating leases and guarantees. As of May 27, 2017, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants in the Facility.

In October 2016, we commenced a modified Dutch auction tender offer to purchase up to 6 million shares of our common stock at a price not greater than $16.00 per share and not less than $13.50 per share. In November 2016, the Company exercised its right to increase the size of the tender offer by up to 2.0% of its outstanding common stock and, following expiration of the tender offer on November 15, 2016, we purchased 6,515,264 shares of our common stock at a per share price of $16.00 for approximately $104.2 million, excluding transaction costs. We funded the tender offer through $58.0 million borrowed under the Facility and the remainder with cash on hand.

Operating Activities, fiscal 2017 and 2016

Operating activities provided $28.3 million and $38.3 million in cash in fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016, respectively. Cash provided by operations in fiscal 2017 resulted from net income of $18.7 million and net favorablenon-cash reconciling adjustments of $14.5 million. Other balance sheet account changes in fiscal 2017, including working capital balances, were a net use of cash of $4.9 million; the primary driver of the use was the increase in the Company’s accounts receivable as of the end of the fiscal year and the unfavorable change in the balance of income taxes due. In fiscal 2016, cash provided by operations resulted from net income of $30.4 million and net favorablenon-cash reconciling adjustments of $12.0 million. Other balance sheet account changes in fiscal 2016, including working capital balances, were a net use of cash of $4.2 million.Non-cash items in both years include depreciation and amortization (which decreased between the two periods by $0.1 million) and stock-based compensation expense which decreased between the two periods by $0.2 million. Stock-based compensation expense does not reflect an actual cash outflow from the Company but is an estimate of the fair value of the services provided by employees and directors in exchange for share-based payments such as stock options, restricted stock and ESPP purchase rights. The change between the two years is also influenced by the acceleration of vesting related to options granted to a senior executive who left the Company in fiscal 2017 (approximately $0.4 million) and the acceleration of vesting in fiscal 2016 of options previously granted to Donald Murray in connection with his transition from Executive Chairman to Chairman (approximately $0.9 million).

Investing Activities, fiscal 2017 and 2016

Net cash provided by investing activities was $20.4 million for fiscal 2017 compared to net cash used of $2.4 million for fiscal 2016. During fiscal 2017, redemptions of short-term investments were $25.0 million as the Company accumulated cash from maturing investments in preparation for the tender offer; in the prior year period, purchases and redemptions of short-term investments were about the same. Purchases of property and equipment increased approximately $2.4 million between the two periods as the Company completed several office relocations.

Financing Activities, fiscal 2017 and 2016

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $76.9 million and $32.3 million for the years ended May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively. Net cash used in financing activities for fiscal 2017 included $104.2 million, excluding transaction costs, used to purchase shares of our common stock in the modified Dutch auction tender offer, with $58.0 million of this amount borrowed under the Facility and the remainder funded from the Company’s existing cash balances. Subsequent to the Dutch auction tender offer, the Company repaid $10.0 million borrowedissued under the Facility. The Company also used $13.5 million to purchase approximately 843,000 shares of common stock onAdditional information regarding the open market during fiscal 2017. This compares to $28.1 million usedFacility is included in fiscal 2016 to purchase approximately 1.8 million shares of its common stock on the open market. Payments for the Company’s dividend program increased slightly from $14.1 million in fiscal 2016 to $14.2 million in fiscal 2017. The increase in quarterly

dividend from $0.10 per common share in fiscal 2016 to $0.11 per common share in fiscal 2017 was offset by the reduced number of shares eligible for dividend after the Company’s Dutch auction tender offer in November 2016. Finally, the Company received approximately $8.4 million in fiscal 2017 from the exercise of employee stock options and issuance of shares via the Company’ ESPP, compared to $9.8 millionNote 7 — Long-Term Debt in the prior fiscal year.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our ongoing operations and anticipated growth in the geographic markets we currently serve will require us to continue to make investments in office premisescritical markets and capital equipment, primarily technology hardwarein systems and software.technology. In addition, we may consider making strategic acquisitions.acquisitions or take on restructuring initiatives, which could require significant liquidity. While we have not seen a significant adverse impact on our overall cash collections as a result of the Pandemic, in an abundance of caution, we borrowed $39.0 million on the Facility in the fourth quarter, to provide substantial additional liquidity to manage our business as the Pandemic continued to develop globally and impact the capital markets. We currently believe that our current cash, ongoing cash flows from our operations and funding available under our Facility will be adequate to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs and to satisfy our cash requirement in executing our restructuring initiatives for at least the next 12 months. If we require additional capital resources to grow our business, either internally or through acquisition, we may seek to sell additional equity securities or to increase our use of our Facility. In addition, if we decide to make additional share repurchases, we may fund these through existing cash balances or use of our Facility. The sale of additional equity securities or certain forms of debt financing could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. We may not be able to obtain financing arrangements in amounts or on terms acceptable to us in the future. In the event we are unable to obtain additional financing when needed, we may be compelled to delay or curtail our plans to develop our business or to pay dividends on our capital stock, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations, market position and competitiveness.

Operating Activities, fiscal 20162020 and 20152019

Operating activities provided $38.3$49.5 million and $31.8$43.6 million in cash in fiscal 20162020 and fiscal 2015,2019, respectively. Cash provided by operations in fiscal 20162020 resulted from net income of $30.4$28.3 million and net favorablenon-cash reconciling adjustments of $12.0$21.5 million. Other balance sheet account changes in fiscal 2016, including working capital balances,These amounts were partially offset by a net useunfavorable change in operating assets and liabilities of cash of $4.2 million; the primary driver of the use was the$0.3 million primarily due to a $7.9 million decrease in accounts payable, a $6.8 million decrease in accrued salaries and related obligations and a $2.5 million increase in the Company’sprepaid income taxes, partially offset by a $10.0 million decrease in trade accounts receivable as of the end of the fiscal year because of higher weekly revenues as compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year.and a $7.3 million increase in other liabilities. In fiscal 2015,2019, cash provided by operations resulted from net income of $27.5$31.5 million and net favorablenon-cash reconciling adjustments of $11.1 million. Other balance sheet account changes in fiscal 2015, including working capital balances, were$22.6 million, partially offset by a  net useunfavorable change in operating assets and liabilities of cash of $6.9 million.Non-cash items in both years include depreciation and amortization (which decreased between the two periods by $0.8$10.4 million because certain intangible assets became fully amortized during fiscal 2015) and stock-based compensation expense which increased between the two periods by $0.3 million. Stock-based compensation expense does not reflect an actual cash outflow from the Company but is an estimate of the fair value of the services provided by employees and directors in exchange for share-based payments such as stock options, restricted stock and ESPP purchase rights. The increase in fiscal 2016 is attributable to the acceleration of vestingprimarily related to options previously granted to Donald Murraydecreases in connection with his transition from Executive Chairman to Chairman.accountsreceivable and income taxes payable.

Investing Activities, fiscal 20162020 and 20152019

Net cash used in investing activities was $2.4$26.8 million for fiscal 20162020, compared to net$12.9 million in fiscal 2019. We used $30.3 million of cash provided(net of $6.6cash acquired) to acquire Veracity in fiscal 2020. There were no acquisitions in fiscal 2019. Purchases of property and equipment decreased approximately $4.6 million forbetween the two periods, as we relocated or refurbished certain offices during fiscal 2015. Cash received from the redemption and purchases2019. We also redeemed $6.0 million of short-term investments (primarily commercial paper) was approximately the same in fiscal 2016 but was a source2020, which we purchased in fiscal 2019.

Financing Activities, fiscal 2020 and 2019

The primary sources of cash in fiscal 2015 of $9.0 million. The Company spent the same amount ($2.4 million) on property and equipment in fiscal 2016 as fiscal 2015.

Financing Activities, fiscal 2016 and 2015

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $32.3 million for the year ended May 28, 2016, compared to $28.9 million for the year ended May 30, 2015. The Company received approximately $9.8 million in fiscal 2016are borrowings under our Facility, cash proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options and proceeds from the issuance of shares via the Company’s ESPP compared to $9.1 million in the prior fiscal year. However, the Company used morepurchased under our ESPP. The primary uses of cash in fiscal 2016 ($28.1 million) to purchase approximately 1.8 million sharesfinancing activities are repayments under the Facility, repurchases of our common stock as comparedand cash dividend payments to $26.3 million to purchase 1.7 million shares of common stock in fiscal 2015. Payments for the Company’s dividend program increased from $11.7our shareholders.

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $30.9 million in fiscal 20152020 compared to $14.1net cash used in financing activities of $43.6 million in fiscal 2016 as a result2019. Financing activities during fiscal 2020 primarily consisted of $74.0 million of proceeds borrowed from the Facility and $10.3 million from the issuance of shares under ESPP and the exercise of employee stock options, partially offset by principal repayments of $29.0 million under the Facility,  $17.6 million of cash dividend payments and  $5.0 million  for share repurchases.  Additional information regarding dividends is included in Note 11 —  Stockholders’ Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The increase in dividends paid in fiscal 2020 compared to fiscal 2019 was due to an increase in quarterly dividends declared from $0.13 per share in fiscal 2019 to $0.14 per share beginning in fiscal 2020. Net cash used by financing activities of $43.6 million in fiscal 2019 consisted of $16.2 million in cash dividends paid, $29.9 million in share repurchases and $20.0 million repaid under our Facility, partially offset by proceeds of $24.3 million from the exercise of employee stock options and the issuance of shares under ESPP.

As described in Note 3 — Acquisitions and Dispositions, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the purchase agreements for Veracity and Expertence require cash earn-out payments to be made when certain performance conditions are met. We estimated the fair value of the Company’s increaseobligation to pay contingent consideration based on a number of different projections of the estimated EBITDA and estimated revenue.  The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration as of May 30, 2020 was $7.9 million, of which $5.0 million is due before the end of calendar 2020 if the terms of the contingent consideration arrangement are met.

30


For a comparison of our cash flow activities for the fiscal years ended May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2018, see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 25, 2019, filed with the SEC on July 19, 2019 (File No. 0-32113).

While the Pandemic has created significant uncertainty in fiscal 2016the global economy and capital markets, which is expected to continue into the remainder of its quarterly dividend2020 and beyond, we currently believe our existing balance of cash, cash flow expected to be generated from $0.08our future operations, and the additional availability under our Facility will provide sufficient cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. However, we could be required, or could elect to $0.10 per common share.

seek additional funding prior to that time. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our ability to continue to adapt and efficiently serve our client, our clients’ project needs during this uncertain time, and our clients’ financial health and ability to make timely payments on our receivables. A material adverse impact from the Pandemic could result in a need for us to raise additional capital or incur additional indebtedness to fund strategic initiatives or operating activities.

Contractual Obligations

At May 27, 2017, the Company30, 2020, we had operating leases, primarily for office premises, and purchase obligations primarily for property and equipment,include payments due under various types of licenses, expiring at various dates through March 2027.2028. At May 27, 2017, the Company30, 2020, we had no capital leases (although, as described in “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we will recognize as liabilities in our Balance Sheet the obligation for outstanding operating leases primarily related to office facilities commencing in fiscal 2020).finance leases. The following table summarizes our future minimum rental commitments under operating leases and our other known contractual obligations as of May 27, 2017:30, 2020:



   Payments Due by Period 
   Total   Fiscal
2018
   Fiscal
2019-2020
   Fiscal
2021-2022
   Thereafter 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Operating lease obligations

  $45,009   $10,537   $16,297   $11,182   $6,993 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Purchase obligations

  $1,129   $440   $575   $114   $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Long-term debt

  $48,000   $—     $—     $48,000   $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Payments Due by Period



 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal

 

Fiscal

 

 

 



Total

 

Fiscal 2021

 

2022-2023

 

2024-2025

 

Thereafter



(Amounts in thousands)

Operating lease obligations

$

45,762 

 

$

12,610 

 

$

19,526 

 

$

10,458 

 

$

3,168 

Purchase obligations

$

4,855 

 

$

2,797 

 

$

2,058 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Long-term debt

$

88,000 

 

$

 -

 

$

88,000 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Long-term debt above reflects our outstanding borrowings under the Facility as of May 30, 2020, assumes no future borrowings under the Facility and does not include any estimated future interest payments. 

The contractual obligations and commitments table above does not reflect the Company’s total liability for unrecognized gross tax benefits, which was $848,000 as of May 30, 2020, because we are unable to reasonably estimate the period during which this obligation may be incurred, if at all.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has

We have nooff-balance sheet arrangements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Information regarding recent accounting pronouncements is contained in Note 2 —Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended May 27, 2017.included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Inflation

Inflation was not a material factor in either revenue or operating expenses during the fiscal years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020,  May 28, 201625, 2019 or May 30, 2015.

26, 2018.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Interest Rate Risk.   We are primarily exposed to market risks from fluctuations in interest rates and the effects of those fluctuations on the market values of our cash and cash equivalents and our borrowings under our Facility that bear interest at a variable market rate.

At the end of fiscal 2017,2020, we had approximately $62.3$95.6 million of cash and cash equivalents and $48.0$88.0 million of borrowings under our Facility. The earnings on investmentscash and cash equivalents are subject to changes in interest rates; however, assuming a constant balance available for investment, a 10% decline in interest rates would reduce our interest income but would not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

31


Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at a rate per annum of either, at the Company’sour option, (i) a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate defined in the FacilityLIBOR plus a margin of 1.25% or 1.50% or (ii) an alternate base rate, plus margin of 0.25% or 0.50% with the applicable margin depending on the Company’sour consolidated leverage ratio. The alternate base rate is the highest of (i) Bank of America’s prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.0%. We are exposed to interest rate risk related to fluctuations in the LIBOR rate primarily;rate; at the current level of borrowborrowing as of May 27, 201730, 2020 of $48.0$88.0 million, a 10% change in interest rates would have resulted in approximately a $0.1$0.2 million change in annual interest expense.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk.  For the year ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, approximately 19.5%19.1% of the Company’sour revenues were generated outside of the United States. As a result, our operating results are subject to fluctuations in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar. Revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the monthly average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Thus, as the value of the U.S. dollar fluctuates relative to the currencies in ournon-United States based operations, our reported results may vary.

Assets and liabilities of ournon-United States based operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate effective at the end of each monthly reporting period. Approximately 58%66.9% of our fiscalyear-end balances of cash and cash equivalents were denominated in U.S. dollars. The remaining amount of approximately 42%33.1% was comprised primarily of cash balances translated from Euros, Japanese Yen, Euros, Canadian DollarsMexican Pesos, Chinese Yuan, and Chinese Yuan.British Pound Sterling. The difference resulting from the translation in each period of assets and liabilities of ournon-United States based operations is recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity in other accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

Although we intend to monitor our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations, we do not currently use financial hedging techniqueshedges to mitigate risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations including in a limited number of circumstances when we may be asked to transact with our client in one currency but are obligated to pay our consultant in another currency. We cannot provide assurance that exchange rate fluctuations will not adversely affect our financial results in the future.

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

32


ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

See also “Item 7. Management’s“Quarterly Results” in Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Quarterly Results,Operations,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

33


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Resources Connection, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Resources Connection, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016, and25, 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 27, 2017. These30, 2020, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether(collectively, the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Resources Connection, Inc. and subsidiariesthe Company as of May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016,25, 2019, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), Resources Connection, Inc.‘s and subsidiaries’the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated July 24, 201727, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Resources Connection, Inc.’s and subsidiaries’the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Change in Accounting Principle


As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of May 26, 2019 due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842, Leases.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ RSM US LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

Irvine, California
July 27, 2020

July 24, 2017

34


RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

   May 27,
      2017      
  May 28,
      2016      
 
   (Amounts in thousands, except
par value per share)
 
ASSETS   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $62,329  $91,089 

Short-term investments

   —     24,957 

Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,517 and $2,994 as of May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively

   98,222   97,807 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   4,395   4,735 

Income taxes receivable

   1,899   —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   166,845   218,588 

Goodwill

   171,088   171,183 

Property and equipment, net

   23,354   21,274 

Deferred income taxes

   973   4,237 

Other assets

   1,868   1,973 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total assets

  $364,128  $417,255 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  $14,102  $13,606 

Accrued salaries and related obligations

   49,241   50,155 

Other liabilities

   8,428   7,123 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   71,771   70,884 

Long-term debt

   48,000   —   

Deferred income taxes

   1,280   —   

Other long-term liabilities

   4,935   3,722 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   125,986   74,606 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

   

Stockholders’ equity:

   

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; zero shares issued and outstanding

   —     —   

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 70,000 shares authorized; 58,992 and 58,237 shares issued, and 29,662 and 36,229 shares outstanding as of May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively

   590   582 

Additionalpaid-in capital

   398,828   388,763 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (11,396  (10,794

Retained earnings

   332,024   327,954 

Treasury stock at cost, 29,330 and 22,008 shares as of May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively

   (481,904  (363,856
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   238,142   342,649 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

  $364,128  $417,255 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

May 30,

 

May 25,



2020

 

2019



 

(Amounts in thousands, except



 

par value per share)

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

95,624 

 

$

43,045 

Short-term investments

 

 -

 

 

5,981 

Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of

 

 

 

 

 

$3,067 and $2,520 as of May 30, 2020 and May 25, 2019, respectively

 

124,986 

 

 

133,304 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

6,222 

 

 

7,103 

Income taxes receivable

 

4,167 

 

 

2,224 

Total current assets

 

230,999 

 

 

191,657 

Goodwill

 

214,067 

 

 

190,815 

Intangible assets, net

 

20,077 

 

 

14,589 

Property and equipment, net

 

23,644 

 

 

26,632 

Operating right-of-use assets

 

34,287 

 

 

 -

Deferred income taxes

 

1,597 

 

 

1,497 

Other assets

 

4,510 

 

 

3,180 

Total assets

$

529,181 

 

$

428,370 



 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

$

15,799 

 

$

21,634 

Accrued salaries and related obligations

 

52,407 

 

 

58,628 

Operating lease liabilities, current

 

11,223 

 

 

 -

Other liabilities

 

15,472 

 

 

11,154 

Total current liabilities

 

94,901 

 

 

91,416 

Long-term debt

 

88,000 

 

 

43,000 

Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent

 

30,672 

 

 

 -

Deferred income taxes

 

6,215 

 

 

5,146 

Other long-term liabilities

 

5,732 

 

 

6,412 

Total liabilities

 

225,520 

 

 

145,974 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; zero shares

 

 

 

 

 

issued and outstanding 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 70,000 shares authorized; 63,910 and

 

 

 

 

 

63,054 shares issued, and 32,144 and 31,588 shares outstanding as of

 

 

 

 

 

May 30, 2020 and May 25, 2019, respectively

 

639 

 

 

631 

Additional paid-in capital

 

477,438 

 

 

460,226 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(13,862)

 

 

(12,588)

Retained earnings

 

360,534 

 

 

350,230 

Treasury stock at cost, 31,766 and 31,466 shares as of

 

 

 

 

 

May 30, 2020 and May 25, 2019, respectively

 

(521,088)

 

 

(516,103)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

303,661 

 

 

282,396 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$

529,181 

 

$

428,370 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

35


RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
  May 28,
2016
  May 30,
2015
 
   (Amounts in thousands, except per 
   share amounts) 

Revenue

  $583,411  $598,521  $590,589 

Direct cost of services, primarily payroll and related taxes for professional services employees

   362,086   366,355   362,227 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Gross margin

   221,325   232,166   228,362 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   183,471   174,806   173,797 

Amortization of intangible assets

   —     90   918 

Depreciation expense

   3,452   3,467   3,389 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from operations

   34,402   53,803   50,258 

Interest expense

   773   —    

Interest income

   (144  (186  (148
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income before provision for income taxes

   33,773   53,989   50,406 

Provision for income taxes

   15,122   23,546   22,898 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income

  $18,651  $30,443  $27,508 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income per common share:

    

Basic

  $0.57  $0.82  $0.73 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

  $0.56  $0.81  $0.72 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   32,851   37,037   37,825 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Diluted

   33,471   37,608   38,248 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

  $0.44  $0.40  $0.32 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018



 

(Amounts in thousands, except



 

 per share amounts)

Revenue

 

$

703,353 

 

$

728,999 

 

$

654,129 

Direct cost of services, primarily payroll and related taxes for

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

professional services employees

 

 

427,870 

 

 

446,560 

 

 

408,074 

Gross margin

 

 

275,483 

 

 

282,439 

 

 

246,055 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

228,067 

 

 

223,802 

 

 

209,042 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

5,745 

 

 

3,799 

 

 

2,298 

Depreciation expense

 

 

5,019 

 

 

4,679 

 

 

4,091 

Income from operations

 

 

36,652 

 

 

50,159 

 

 

30,624 

Interest expense, net

 

 

2,061 

 

 

2,190 

 

 

1,735 

Other income

 

 

(637)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Income before provision for income taxes

 

 

35,228 

 

 

47,969 

 

 

28,889 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

6,943 

 

 

16,499 

 

 

10,063 

Net income

 

$

28,285 

 

$

31,470 

 

$

18,826 

Net income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.88 

 

$

1.00 

 

$

0.61 

Diluted

 

$

0.88 

 

$

0.98 

 

$

0.60 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

31,989 

 

 

31,596 

 

 

30,741 

Diluted

 

 

32,227 

 

 

32,207 

 

 

31,210 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.56 

 

$

0.52 

 

$

0.48 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

36


RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME



   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
  May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:

     

Net income

  $18,651  $30,443   $27,508 

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax

   (602  123    (8,344
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

  $18,049  $30,566   $19,164 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,



2020

 

2019

 

2018



(Amounts in thousands)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

28,285 

 

$

31,470 

 

$

18,826 

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax

 

(1,274)

 

 

(2,203)

 

 

      1,011

Total comprehensive income

$

27,011 

 

$

29,267 

 

$

19,837 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

37


RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY



   Common Stock   Additional
Paid-in
Capital
  Treasury Stock  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
  Retained
Earnings
  Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
        
        
  Shares  Amount    Shares  Amount    
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Balances as of May 31, 2014

   56,738   567    360,445   18,580   (311,508  (2,573  298,830  $345,761 

Exercise of stock options

   408   4    5,299       5,303 

Stock-based compensation expense

      5,989       5,989 

Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation arrangements

      (1,216      (1,216

Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

   337   4    3,768       3,772 

Issuance of restricted stock

   6          —   

Issuance of restricted stock out of treasury stock to board of director members

       (44  1,026    (1,026  —   

Forfeitures of restricted stock

   (1         —   

Purchase of shares

       1,679   (26,277    (26,277

Cash dividends declared ($0.32 per share)

          (12,044  (12,044

Currency translation adjustment

         (8,344   (8,344

Net income for the year ended May 30, 2015

          27,508   27,508 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of May 30, 2015

   57,488   575    374,285   20,215   (336,759  (10,917  313,268   340,452 

Exercise of stock options

   418   4    5,304       5,308 

Stock-based compensation expense

      6,280       6,280 

Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation arrangements

      (1,565      (1,565

Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

   325   3    4,459       4,462 

Issuance of restricted stock

   6          —   

Issuance of restricted stock out of treasury stock to board of director members

       (44  1,031    (1,031  —   

Purchase of shares

       1,837   (28,128    (28,128

Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per share)

          (14,726  (14,726

Currency translation adjustment

         123    123 

Net income for the year ended May 28, 2016

          30,443   30,443 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of May 28, 2016

   58,237   582    388,763   22,008   (363,856  (10,794  327,954   342,649 

Exercise of stock options

   305   3    3,853       3,856 

Stock-based compensation expense

      6,068       6,068 

Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation arrangements

      (4,344      (4,344

Issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

   359   4    4,489       4,493 

Issuance of restricted stock

   92   1    (1      —   

Issuance of restricted stock out of treasury stock to board of director members

       (36  838    (838  —   

Forfeitures of restricted stock

   (1         —   

Purchase of shares

       7,358   (118,886    (118,886

Cash dividends declared ($0.44 per share)

          (13,743  (13,743

Currency translation adjustment

         (602   (602

Net income for the year ended May 27, 2017

          18,651   18,651 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balances as of May 27, 2017

   58,992  $590   $398,828   29,330  $(481,904 $(11,396 $332,024  $238,142 
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

Total



 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Treasury Stock

 

Comprehensive

 

Retained

 

Stockholders'



 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

(Loss) Income

 

Earnings

 

Equity



 

(Amounts in thousands)

Balances as of May 27, 2017

 

58,992 

 

$

590 

 

 

$398,828 

 

29,330 

 

$

(481,904)

 

$

(11,396)

 

$

332,024 

 

$

238,142 

Exercise of stock options

 

517 

 

 

 

 

6,483 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,489 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,978 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,978 

Issuance of common stock under Employee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Purchase Plan

 

339 

 

 

 

 

3,947 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,950 

Issuance of restricted stock

 

105 

 

 

 

 

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

Issuance of restricted stock out of treasury 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

stock to board of director members

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13)

 

 

298 

 

 

 

 

 

(298)

 

 

 -

Purchase of shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

321 

 

 

(5,116)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,116)

Issuance of common stock for acquisition of Accretive

 

1,072 

 

 

11 

 

 

11,743 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,754 

Issuance of common stock for acquisition of taskforce

 

227 

 

 

 

 

2,600 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,602 

Cash dividends declared ($0.48 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,811)

 

 

(14,811)

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,011 

 

 

 

 

 

1,011 

Net income for the year ended May 26, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,826 

 

 

18,826 

Balances as of May 26, 2018

 

61,252 

 

$

613 

 

$

429,578 

 

29,638 

 

$

(486,722)

 

$

(10,385)

 

$

335,741 

 

$

268,825 

Exercise of stock options

 

1,444 

 

 

15 

 

 

19,794 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,809 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,358 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,358 

Issuance of common stock under Employee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Purchase Plan

 

358 

 

 

 

 

4,496 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,499 

Issuance of restricted stock out of treasury 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

stock to board of director members

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(21)

 

 

510 

 

 

 

 

 

(510)

 

 

 -

Purchase of shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,849 

 

 

(29,891)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29,891)

Cash dividends declared ($0.52 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16,471)

 

 

(16,471)

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,203)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,203)

Net income for the year ended May 25, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,470 

 

 

31,470 

Balances as of May 25, 2019

 

63,054 

 

$

631 

 

$

460,226 

 

31,466 

 

$

(516,103)

 

$

(12,588)

 

$

350,230 

 

$

282,396 

Exercise of stock options

 

376 

 

 

 

 

5,122 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,125 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,833 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,833 

Issuance of common stock under Employee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Purchase Plan

 

400 

 

 

 

 

5,127 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,131 

Cancellation of restricted stock

 

(13)

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

Issuance of restricted stock

 

10 

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 -

Issuance of restricted stock out of treasury 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

stock to board of director members

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10)

 

(18)

 

 

15 

 

 

 

 

 

(5)

 

 

 -

Repurchase of shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

318 

 

 

(5,000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,000)

Cash dividends declared ($0.56 per share)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(17,976)

 

 

(17,976)

Issuance of common stock in connection with the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

acquisition of Accretive

 

83 

 

 

 

 

1,140 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,141 

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,274)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,274)

Net income for the year ended May 30, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,285 

 

 

28,285 

Balances as of May 30, 2020

 

63,910 

 

$

639 

 

$

477,438 

 

31,766 

 

$

(521,088)

 

$

(13,862)

 

$

360,534 

 

$

303,661 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

38


RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
  May 28,
2016
  May 30,
2015
 
   (Amounts in thousands) 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net income

  $18,651  $30,443  $27,508 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

   3,452   3,557   4,307 

Stock-based compensation expense

   6,068   6,280   5,989 

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

   (8  (185  (86

Loss on disposal of assets

   19   —     15 

Bad debt expense

   458   1,118   212 

Deferred income taxes

   4,538   1,243   692 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Trade accounts receivable

   (1,494  (2,702  (10,052

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   374   (651  547 

Income taxes

   (6,232  (949  (2,187

Other assets

   253   15   254 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   681   176   304 

Accrued salaries and related obligations

   (434  1,574   4,090 

Other liabilities

   1,939   (1,657  158 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   28,265   38,262   31,751 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Redemption of short-term investments

   24,957   45,000   49,000 

Purchase of short-term investments

   —     (44,969  (40,002

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

   233   —     —   

Purchase of property and equipment

   (4,781  (2,381  (2,364
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   20,409   (2,350  6,634 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

   3,856   5,308   5,303 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

   4,493   4,462   3,772 

Purchase of common stock

   (118,886  (28,128  (26,277

Proceeds from Revolving Credit Facility

   58,000   —     —   

Repayment on Revolving Credit Facility

   (10,000  —     —   

Debt issuance costs

   (190  —     —   

Cash dividends paid

   (14,157  (14,085  (11,748

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

   8   185   86 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (76,876  (32,258  (28,864
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

   (558  185   (2,562
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash

   (28,760  3,839   6,959 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   91,089   87,250   80,291 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

  $62,329  $91,089  $87,250 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,



2020

 

2019

 

2018



(Amounts in thousands)

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

28,285 

 

$

31,470 

 

$

18,826 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

10,764 

 

 

8,478 

 

 

6,389 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

6,057 

 

 

6,570 

 

 

6,033 

Contingent consideration adjustment

 

794 

 

 

(590)

 

 

 -

Loss on disposal of assets

 

484 

 

 

126 

 

 

14 

Impairment of operating right-of-use assets

 

649 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Bad debt expense

 

1,840 

 

 

1,540 

 

 

826 

Deferred income taxes

 

911 

 

 

6,452 

 

 

(5,035)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of business combinations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

10,010 

 

 

(5,690)

 

 

(19,373)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

980 

 

 

109 

 

 

(1,567)

Income taxes

 

(2,472)

 

 

(4,324)

 

 

4,733 

Other assets

 

(1,332)

 

 

(1,147)

 

 

(166)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

(7,902)

 

 

(1,469)

 

 

3,332 

Accrued salaries and related obligations

 

(6,810)

 

 

547 

 

 

4,173 

Other liabilities

 

7,265 

 

 

1,549 

 

 

(2,815)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

49,523 

 

 

43,621 

 

 

15,370 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redemption of short-term investments

 

5,981 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Purchase of short-term investments

 

 -

 

 

(5,981)

 

 

 -

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

105 

 

 

 -

 

 

Acquisition of Expertence,  net of cash acquired

 

(254)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Acquisition of Veracity,  net of cash acquired

 

(30,258)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

Acquisition of Accretive

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(20,047)

Acquisition of taskforce, net of cash acquired

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

(3,410)

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(2,346)

 

 

(6,896)

 

 

(2,213)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(26,772)

 

 

(12,877)

 

 

(25,666)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

5,125 

 

 

19,809 

 

 

6,489 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

5,131 

 

 

4,499 

 

 

3,949 

Purchase of common stock

 

(5,000)

 

 

(29,891)

 

 

(5,116)

Payment of contingent consideration

 

(1,771)

 

 

(1,860)

 

 

(2,579)

Proceeds from Revolving Credit Facility

 

74,000 

 

 

 -

 

 

15,000 

Repayments on Revolving Credit Facility

 

(29,000)

 

 

(20,000)

 

 

 -

Cash dividends paid

 

(17,581)

 

 

(16,158)

 

 

(14,269)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

30,904 

 

 

(43,601)

 

 

3,474 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

(1,076)

 

 

(568)

 

 

963 

Net increase (decrease) in cash

 

52,579 

 

 

(13,425)

 

 

(5,859)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

43,045 

 

 

56,470 

 

 

62,329 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

95,624 

 

$

43,045 

 

$

56,470 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

39


RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Description of the Company and its Business

Resources Connection, Inc. (“Resources Connection”), a Delaware corporation, was incorporated on November 16, 1998. Resources Connection is a multinational professional services firm; itsThe Company’s operating entities provide services primarily under the name Resources Global Professionals (“RGP” or the “Company”). TheRGP is a global consulting firm that enables rapid business outcomes by bringing together the right people to create transformative change. As a human capital partner for our clients, the Company provides agile consulting services to its global client base utilizing experienced professionalsspecializes in solving today’s most pressing business problems across the enterprise in the areas of accounting; finance; governance, risktransactions, regulations and compliance management; corporate advisory, strategic communications and restructuring; information management; human capital; supply chain management; and legal and regulatory.transformations. The Company has offices in the United States (“U.S.”), Asia, Australia, Canada, Europe and Mexico.

The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks, ending on the Saturday in May closest to May 31. Fiscal years 2017, 20162019 and 20152018 consisted of four 13 week13-week quarters and included a total of 52 weeks of activity forin the fiscal year. For fiscal years of 53 weeks, (which next occurs for fiscal 2020),year 2020, the first three quarters consistconsisted of 13 weeks each and the fourth quarter consistsconsisted of 14 weeks.weeks, with a total of 53 weeks of activity in the fiscal year.  

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company (“financial statements”) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”) and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

40


Risk and Uncertainties

Since the start of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic (the “Pandemic”) has spread to many of the countries in which the Company and its customers conduct businesses. Governments throughout the world have implemented, and may continue to implement, stay-at-home orders, proclamations and directives aimed at minimizing the spread of the COVID-19 virus. The impact of the Pandemic and the resulting restrictions have caused disruptions in the U.S. and global economy and may continue to disrupt financial markets and global economic activities. The Company has taken precautions and steps to prevent or reduce infection among its employees, including limiting business travel and mandating working from home in many of the countries in which it operates. While overall productivity remained high through the end of fiscal 2020, these measures may disrupt the Company’s normal business operations and negatively impact its productivity and ability to efficiently serve its clients. As events relating to COVID-19 continue to develop and evolve globally, there is significant uncertainty as to the full likely effects of the Pandemic which may, among other things, reduce demand for or delay client decisions to procure the Company’ services or result in cancellation of existing projects. While the full impact from the Pandemic is not quantifiable, the Company’s results of operations and cash flows were adversely impacted in the latter half of fiscal 2020. Although management does not expect the Pandemic to have a permanent impact on its business operations, the Company cannot estimate the length or the magnitude of the Pandemic and how this might affect its customers’ demand for services and the Company’s ability to continue to operate efficiently. Management believes the Pandemic could continue to have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial position in fiscal 2021. Management is uncertain whether future effects of the Pandemic will be similar to what the Company has experienced in fiscal 2020. Management continues to monitor relevant business metrics, such as daily and weekly revenue run rate, pipeline activities, rate of consultant attrition and days sales outstanding, and has implemented modifications to the Company’s normal operations. Management believes the restructuring initiatives that the Company took in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 have better prepared the Company to operate with agility and resilience in this challenging economic environment.

The Company’s primary source of liquidity historically has been cash provided by its operations and its $120.0 million secured revolving credit facility (“Facility”) which expires on October 17, 2021. As of May 30, 2020, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $95.6 million, and additional availability under the Facility of $30.7 million. Given its balance sheet and liquidity position, management believes that the Company has the financial flexibility and resources needed to operate in the current uncertain economic environment. However, if global economic conditions worsen as a result of the Pandemic, it could materially impact the Company’s liquidity position and capital needs.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted in the U.S. in response to the Pandemic. The CARES Act includes, among other things, direct financial assistance to Americans in the form of cash payments to individuals, aid to small businesses in the form of loans, and other tax incentives in an effort to stabilize the U.S. economy and keep Americans employed. The Company has not filed, and currently does not intend to file, for funding provided by the CARES Act. The Company has deferred $2.9 million in payroll tax payments as of the end of fiscal 2020 in the U.S. The Company does not believe the income tax provisions such as changes to the net operating loss rules included in the CARES Act will have a material impact on it. The Company has not received, and does not expect to receive significant government-provided relief or stimulus funding in other parts of the world.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Although management believes these estimates and assumptions are adequate, actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.

Revenue Recognition

Effective May 27, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), using the modified retrospective method, which allows companies to apply the new revenue standard to reporting periods beginning in the year the standard is first implemented, while prior periods continue to be reported in accordance with previous accounting guidance. The adoption of ASC 606 did not have a significant impact on revenue recognition; therefore, the Company did not have an opening retained earnings adjustment for the fiscal year ended May 25, 2019.

Revenues are recognized and billed when control of the promised service is transferred to the Company’s professionals deliverclients, in an amount that reflects the consideration expected in exchange for the services. Revenue is recorded net of sales or other transaction taxes collected from clients and remitted to taxing authorities. Revenues from contracts are recognized over time, based on hours worked by the Company’s professionals. The performance of the agreed-to service over time is the single performance obligation for revenues. Certain clients may receive discounts (for example, volume discounts or rebates) to the amounts billed. These discounts or rebates are considered variable consideration. Management evaluates the facts and circumstances of each contract and client relationship to estimate the variable consideration assessing the most likely amount to recognize and considering management’s expectation of the volume of services to be

41


provided over the applicable period. Rebates are the largest component of variable consideration and are estimated using the most likely amount method prescribed by ASC 606, contracts terms and estimates of revenue. Revenues are recognized net of variable consideration to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of revenues will not occur in subsequent periods.

On a limited basis, the Company may have fixed-price contracts, for which revenues are recognized over time using the input method based on time incurred as a proportion of estimated total time. Time incurred represents work performed, which corresponds with, and therefore best depicts, the transfer of control to the client. Management uses significant judgments when estimating the total hours expected to complete the contract performance obligation. It is possible that updated estimates for consulting engagements may vary from initial estimates with such updates being recognized in the period of determination. Depending on the timing of billings and services rendered, the Company accrues or defers revenue as appropriate.

The Company recognizes revenues on a gross basis as it acts as a principal for primarily all of its revenue transactions. The Company has concluded that gross reporting is appropriate because the Company a) has the risk of identifying and hiring qualified consultants; b) has the discretion to select the consultants and establish the price and responsibilities for services to be provided; and c) bears the risk for services provided that are not fully paid for by clients. The Company recognizes all reimbursements received from clients for “out-of-pocket” expenses as revenue and all such expenses as direct cost of services. Reimbursements received from clients were $9.4 million, $12.3 million and $11.8 million for the years ended May 30, 2020, May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2018, respectively.

The Company’s clients are contractually obligated to pay the Company for all hours billed. We invoice the majority of our clients on a weekly basis or, in certain circumstances, on a monthly basis, in accordance with our typical arrangement of payment due within 30 days. To a much lesser extent, the Company also earns revenue if one of its consultants is hired by, or if the Company places an outside candidate with, its client. Conversion fees or permanent placement fees are recognized when one of the Company’s professionals, or a candidate identified by the Company, accepts an offer of permanent employment from a client.client and all requisite terms of the agreement have been met. Such conversion fees or permanent placement fees are recognized when the performance obligation is considered complete, which the Company considers a) when the consultant or candidate accepts the position; b) the consultant or candidate has notified either RGP or their current employer of their decision; and c) the start date is within the Company’s current quarter. Conversion fees were 0.4%,  0.5% and 0.4% of revenue for each of the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 26, 2018, respectively. Permanent placement fees were 0.6%,  0.6% and 0.3% of revenue for the years ended May 30, 2015.2020, May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2018, respectively.

The Company’s contracts generally have termination for convenience provisions and do not have termination penalties. While our clients are contractually obligated to pay the Company for all hours billed, the Company does not have long-term agreements with its clients for the provision of services and the Company’s clients may terminate engagements at any time. All costs of compensating the Company’s professionals are the responsibility of the Company and are included in direct cost of services.

Client Reimbursements of“Out-of-Pocket” Expenses

The Company recognizes all reimbursements received from clients for“out-of-pocket” expenses as revenue and all such expenses as direct cost of services. Reimbursements received from clients were $10.1 million, $10.6 million and $10.6 million for the years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements of subsidiaries outside the U.S. are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at current exchange rates, income and expense items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period and the related translation adjustments are recorded as a component of comprehensive income or loss within stockholders’ equity. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Per Share Information

The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period, calculated using the treasury stock method for stock options.method. Under the treasury stock method, exercise proceeds include the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost related to stock awards for future services that the Company has not yet recognized and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additionalpaid-in capital when the award becomes deductible. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect. Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the average market price over the period are anti-dilutive and are excluded from the calculation.

42


The following table summarizes the calculation of net income per share for the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 30, 201526, 2018 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
 

Net income

  $18,651   $30,443   $27,508 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic:

      

Weighted average shares

   32,851    37,037    37,825 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted:

      

Weighted average shares

   32,851    37,037    37,825 

Potentially dilutive shares

   620    571    423 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dilutive shares

   33,471    37,608    38,248 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per common share:

      

Basic

  $0.57   $0.82   $0.73 

Dilutive

  $0.56   $0.81   $0.72 

Anti-dilutive shares not included above

   4,582    4,745    5,746 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

For the Years Ended



 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,



 

2020

 

2019

 

2018



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

28,285 

 

$

31,470 

 

$

18,826 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares

 

 

31,989 

 

 

31,596 

 

 

30,741 

Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares

 

 

31,989 

 

 

31,596 

 

 

30,741 

Potentially dilutive shares

 

 

238 

 

 

611 

 

 

469 

Total dilutive shares

 

 

32,227 

 

 

32,207 

 

 

31,210 

Net income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.88 

 

$

1.00 

 

$

0.61 

Dilutive

 

$

0.88 

 

$

0.98 

 

$

0.60 

Anti-dilutive shares not included above

 

 

4,731 

 

 

3,316 

 

 

4,619 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers cash on hand, deposits in banks, and short-term investments purchased with an original maturity date of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reflected in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximate the fair values due to the short maturities of these instruments.

Short-Term Investments

The Company’s short-term investments were $25.0 million as of May 28, 2016 with original contractual maturities of between three months and one year. The Company had no short-term investments as of May 27, 2017. The Company had no investments with a maturity in excess of one year as of the end of either fiscal year 2017 or 2016. The Company carries debt securities that it has the ability and positive intent to hold to maturity at amortized cost.Financial Instruments

The fair value of the Company’s financial instruments reflects the amounts that the Company estimates it will receive in

connection with the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation techniques into the following three levels:

Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets.

Level 3 Unobservable inputs.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



The following table shows the Company’s financial instruments that are measured and recorded in the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



May 30, 2020

 

May 25, 2019



 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

 

$

 -

$

5,981 

$

 -

Total assets

$

 -

$

 -

$

 -

 

$

 -

$

5,981 

$

 -



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration liability

$

 -

$

 -

$

7,898 

 

$

 -

$

 -

$

2,195 

Total liabilities

$

 -

$

 -

$

7,898 

 

$

 -

$

 -

$

2,195 

The Company’s short-term investments had original contractual maturities of between three months and one year and are considered “held-to-maturity” securities. The Company had no investments with a maturity in excess of one year as of the end of either fiscal year 2020 or 2019. The Company’s investments in commercial paper and U.S. Government Agency securitiesor money market account are measured using quoted prices in markets that are not active (Level 2). There were no unrealized holding gains or losses as of May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016. Short-term investments consist25, 2019.

43


Contingent consideration liability presented in the table above is for estimated future contingent consideration cash payments related to the Company’s acquisitions. Total contingent consideration liabilities were $7.9 million and $2.2 million as of May 30, 2020 and May 25, 2019, respectively. The fair value measurement of the following (in thousands):liability is based on significant inputs not observed in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the contingent consideration liability are the Company’s measures of the estimated payouts based on internally generated financial projections and discount rates. The fair value of contingent consideration liability is remeasured on a quarterly basis by the Company using additional information as it becomes available, and any change in the fair value estimates are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 3 – Acquisitions and Dispositions



   As of May 27, 2017   As of May 28, 2016 
   Cost   Fair Value   Cost   Fair Value 

Commercial paper

  $—     $—     $19,959   $19,959 

U.S. Government Agency securities

   —      —      4,998    4,998 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $—     $—     $24,957   $24,957 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and long-term debt are carried at cost, which approximates their fair value because of the short‑term maturity of these instruments or because their stated interest rates are indicative of market interest rates.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from its clients’ failure to make required payments for services rendered. Management estimates this allowance based upon knowledge of the financial condition of the Company’s clients (which may not include knowledge of all significant events), review of historical receivable and reserve trends and other pertinent information. If the financial condition of the Company’s clients deteriorates or there is an unfavorable trend in aggregate receivable collections, additional allowances may be required.

The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands):



   Beginning
Balance
   Charged to
Operations
   Currency
Rate
Changes
  (Write-offs)/
Recoveries
  Ending
Balance
 

Years Ended:

        

May 30, 2015

  $3,139   $212   $(78 $18  $3,291 

May 28, 2016

  $3,291   $1,118   $(16 $(1,399 $2,994 

May 27, 2017

  $2,994   $458   $(20 $(915 $2,517 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Beginning

 

Charged to

 

Rate

 

(Write-offs)/

 

Ending



 

Balance

 

Operations

 

Changes

 

Recoveries

 

Balance

Years Ended:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 26, 2018

 

$

2,517 

 

$

826 

 

$

12 

 

$

(1,715)

 

$

1,640 

May 25, 2019

 

$

1,640 

 

$

1,540 

 

$

 -

 

$

(660)

 

$

2,520 

May 30, 2020

 

$

2,520 

 

$

1,840 

 

$

(18)

 

$

(1,275)

 

$

3,067 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:



Building

30 years

Furniture

5 to 10 years

Leasehold improvements

Lesser of useful life of asset or term of lease

Computer, equipment and software

3 to 5 years

Costs for normal repairs and maintenance are expensed to operations as incurred, while renewals and major refurbishments are capitalized.

Assessments

Long-lived Assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of whether there has been a permanent impairment in the value of property and equipment are periodically performed by considering factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other economic factors. Management believes no permanent impairment has occurred.

Goodwill

Goodwill is not subject to amortization but is testedlong‑lived assets for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset mightmay not be impaired.recoverable. The impairment test comprises two steps. The first step compares the carrying amount of the asset to the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows. If the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows exceeds the carrying amount of the asset, no impairment is taken. If the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a second step is warranted and an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value calculated using the present value of estimated net future cash flows. The Company performedrecorded $0.6 million right-of-use (“ROU”) assets impairment for the year ended May 30, 2020 associated with exiting certain real estate leases as part of its annual goodwillrestructuring and business transformation initiative. The impairment analysis ascharge is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended May 27, 2017

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)30, 2020.



44


Goodwill and will continueIntangible Assets

Goodwill is recorded at the time of an acquisition and is calculated as the difference between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is not subject to testamortization but the carrying value is tested for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its impairment analysis by comparing its market capitalization to its book value throughouton an annual basis in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.year, or more frequently if the Company believes indicators of impairment exist. Impairment evaluations involve management’s assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that goodwill is impaired. If management concludes from its assessment of qualitative factors that it is more likely than not that impairment exists, then a quantitative impairment test will be performed. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasts of future operating results that are used in these evaluations. For application of this methodology, the Company determined that it operates as a single reporting unit resulting from the combination of its practice offices. NoThe Company’s annual goodwill impairment analysis indicated that there was indicated as ofno related impairment for the fiscal years ended May 27, 2017. 30, 2020, May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2018, respectively.

The Company has no otherCompany’s identifiable intangible assets.assets include customer contracts and relationships, tradenames, backlog, consultant list, non-compete agreements and computer software. These assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over lives ranging from 17 months to ten years. 

See Note 4 —Intangible Assets and Goodwill for a further description of the Company’s intangible assets.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including restricted stock awards, employee stock options and employee stock purchases made via the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), based on estimated fair value at the date of grant.

The Company estimates the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from that estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods. Excess income tax benefits and deficiencies from stock-based compensation are recognized as a discrete item within the provision for income taxes on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Stock options vest over four years and restricted stock award vesting is determined on an individual grant basis under the Company’s 2014 Performance Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”). The Company determines the estimated value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model.model and the estimated value of restricted stock awards using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period for optionsawards that are expected to vest and records adjustments to compensation expense at the end of the service period if actual forfeitures differ from original estimates.

See Note 1013 —Stock BasedStock-Based Compensation Plans for further information on the 2014 Plan and stock-based compensation.

Income Taxes

The Company recognizes deferred income taxes for the estimated tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at eachyear-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized when, in management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The provision for income taxes represents current taxes payable net of the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.The Company also evaluates its uncertain tax positions and only recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percentage likelihood of being realized upon settlement. The Company records a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Any change in judgment related to the expected ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions is recognized in earnings in the period in which such change occurs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During Current Fiscal Year 2020

Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU2015-17. The standard requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet rather than being separated into current and noncurrent portions. ASU2015-17 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. As permitted, the Company early adopted ASU2015-17 during the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 on a retrospective basis. Accordingly, current deferred taxes have been reclassified as noncurrent on the May 28, 2016 Consolidated Balance Sheet. This reclassification decreased current deferred tax assets by $8.4 million and increased noncurrent deferred tax assets by $8.4 million. The Company also netted noncurrent deferred tax liabilities of $5.0 million against noncurrent deferred tax assets.

Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments.In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU2015-16. This ASU eliminates the requirement to retrospectively account for changes to provisional amounts initially recorded in a business combination. ASU2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined, including the effect of the change in provisional amount as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The Company adopted this guidanceEffective as of the beginning of fiscal 2017year 2020, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases, ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases and will consider it during future business combinations.

ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements to Topic 842, Leases. The guidance is intended to increase transparency and comparability among companies for leasing transactions, including a requirement for companies that lease assets to recognize on their balance sheets the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.45

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


created by those leases. The guidance also provides for disclosures that allow the users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.



Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-15.This ASU provides guidance regarding management’s responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The Company adopted thisthe guidance on May 26, 2019, the first day of its fiscal 2020, using the modified retrospective approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment, which after completing the implementation analysis, resulted in no adjustment to the Company’s May 26, 2019 beginning retained earnings balance. Periods prior to the date of adoption are presented in accordance with ASC 840, Leases.  As part of the adoption, the Company elected the package of practical expedients, which among other things, permits the Company to not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and the initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not assess whether existing land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases are or contain a lease under the new guidance. The Company did not elect the hindsight practice expedient to use hindsight when determining lease term and assessing impairment of ROU lease assets. On May 26, 2019, the Company recognized $43.2 million of ROU assets and $51.0 million of operating lease liabilities, including noncurrent operating lease liabilities of $38.5 million, as a result of the adoption. The difference between the ROU assets and the operating lease liabilities was primarily due to previously accrued rent expense relating to periods prior to May 26, 2019, and the remaining prepaid rent balance as of the beginning of fiscal 2017.

Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms ofMay 25, 2019. The adoption did not have an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-12. This ASU provides guidance requiring that a performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The Company adopted this guidance as of the beginning of fiscal 2017. The Company does not currently have any performance based awards and thus the adoption has not had a material impact on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption

Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scoperesults of Modification Accounting.In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU2017-09, which clarifies when changes to the termsoperations or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. Undercash flows. Additional information and disclosures required by the new guidance, modification accounting is only required if standard are contained in Note 6—Leases.

In January 2017, the fair value, vesting conditions or classification (equity or liability) of the new award are different from the original award immediately before the original award is modified. The new standard is effective for financial statements for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (for the company, fiscal 2019). Early adoption is permitted. The guidance must be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date. The future impact ofFinancial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2017-04 2017-09 will be dependent on the nature of future stock award modifications.

Intangibles — GoodwillIntangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.In January 2017, the FASB issued Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 which provides guidance regarding the goodwill impairment testing process. The new standard eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. If a company determines in Step 1step two of the goodwill impairment test and specifies that the carrying value of goodwill is greater thanimpairment should be measured by comparing the fair value an impairment for that difference mustof a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Additionally, the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount of net assets should be recorded in the income statement, rather than proceeding to Step 2. The new standarddisclosed. ASU 2017-04 is effective for financial statements for annual periodsor interim goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 (for the Company, fiscal 2021). Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairments tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. Based on the Company’s most recent annual goodwill impairment test completed in fiscal 2017, the Company expects no initial impact on adoption.

Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-15, which provides guidance designed to address diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. Examples include cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment; contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; and proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies.The new standard is effective for financial statements for annual and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 (for the Company, fiscal 2019). Early2019; early adoption is permitted. The Company believesearly adopted ASU 2017-04 as of the beginning of fiscal 2020. The adoption of this guidance willASU 2017-04 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements

3. Acquisitions and Dispositions

Acquisition of Expertence

On November 30, 2019, the Company acquired Expertforce Interim Projects GmbH, LLC (“Expertence”), a leading provider of professional interim management services, based in Munich, Germany. With the acquisition of Expertence, the Company is able to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-09. The new standard modifies several aspectsoffer a full range of the accountingproject and reporting for employee share-based payments and related tax accounting impacts, including the presentationmanagement consulting services in the statementsGerman market.  The Company paid an initial cash consideration of operations and cash flows$0.4 million. The initial consideration is subject to final adjustments for the impact of certain tax benefits or deficiencies and employee tax withholdings,working capital as well asdefined in the accounting for award forfeiturespurchase agreement.

In addition, the purchase agreement requires earn-out payments to be made based on performance over the vesting period. The new standard is effective for financial statements for annual and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 (for the Company, fiscal 2018).an 18-month period ending on May 31, 2021. The Company is currently evaluatingobligated to pay the impactformer owners of Expertence contingent consideration if certain revenue targets are achieved, up to a maximum of $0.3 million.  In determining the adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements but anticipates three potential impacts: a) added volatility to the Company’s effective tax rate from the change in accounting for income taxes; b) changes to its classification of excess tax benefits on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows; and c) change in the accounting for forfeitures, as the guidance allows the

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Company to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimating the expected forfeitures over the coursefair value of the vesting period. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of adoption of this guidance and its preliminary assessments are subject to change.

Leases (Topic 842): Leases.In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU2016-02, which amends the existing guidance to require lessees to recognize operating lease obligations on their balance sheets by recording the rights and obligations created by those leases. The requirements are effective for financial statements for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 (forcontingent consideration liability, the Company fiscal 2020), and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU2016-02 will haveused an estimate based on its consolidated financial statements and believes that it will have a significant impact on the Company’s reported balance sheet assets and liabilities. Under current accounting guidelines, the Company’s office leases are operating lease arrangements, in which rental payments are treated as operating expenses and there is no recognition of the arrangement on the balance sheet as an asset with related obligation to the lessor.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU2014-09, a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede current revenue recognition guidance and is intended to improve and converge revenue recognition and related financial reporting requirements. The core principle of this guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance provides a number of stepspossible projections over the earnout period and applied a probability to apply to achieve that core principle and requires additional disclosures. In August 2015,each possible outcome.  Given the FASB issued ASU2015-14, which delaysshort duration of the required implementation date forearnout period, the Company until fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted for fiscal 2018.fair value of contingent liability was measured on an undiscounted basis.  The Company has elected to adoptremeasures the guidance beginningfair value of the contingent consideration at each reporting period, and any change in fiscal 2019. The standard allows for either “full retrospective” adoption, meaning the standardfair value is applied to all periods presented, or “cumulative effect” adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presentedrecognized in the financial statements. In addition, in March 2016, the FASB issuedASU 2016-12, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients (Topic 606), which provides clarifying guidance in certain areas and adds some practical expedients. The effective date for this ASU is the same as the effective date forASU 2014-09. We intend to implement the standard using the modified retrospective approach, which recognizes the cumulative effect (if any) of application recognized on that date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidance, including required disclosures, and based upon our current analysis, does not expect a significant impact on processes, systems or controls. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of adoption of this guidance and its preliminary assessments are subject to change.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the SEC did not, or are not expected to, have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations financial position orin the applicable period. The estimate of the fair value of contingent consideration requires very subjective assumptions to be made of various potential revenue results.  The Company does not expect future revisions to these assumptions to materially change the estimate of the fair value of contingent consideration and the Company’s future operating results.

Fair value of consideration transferred (in thousands):

Cash

$

383 

Estimated initial contingent consideration

305 

Total

$

688 

46


Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):

Cash and cash equivalents

$

11 

Accounts receivable

215 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Intangible assets:

Computer software (24 months useful life)

184 

Total identifiable assets

417 

Accounts payable

196 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Deferred tax liability

59 

Total liabilities assumed

263 

Net identifiable assets acquired

154 

Goodwill

534 

Net assets acquired

$

688 

Results of operations of Expertence are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition and were not material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations. The amount of the acquisition costs incurred as included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended May 30, 2020 was immaterial.

Acquisition of Veracity

On July 31, 2019, the Company acquired Veracity Consulting Group, LLC (“Veracity”), a fast-growing, digital transformation firm based in Richmond, Virginia, that delivers innovative solutions to the Fortune 500 and leading healthcare organizations. The acquisition of Veracity is a critical step in accelerating the Company’s stated objective to enhance its digital capabilities and allows the Company to offer comprehensive end-to-end solutions to its clients by combining Veracity’s customer-facing offerings with the Company’s depth of experience in transforming the back office. The Company paid an initial cash flows.consideration of $30.3 million (net of $2.1 million cash acquired). The initial consideration is subject to final adjustments for the impact of the Internal Revenue Code Section 338(h)(10) joint election between the Company and former owners of Veracity and working capital as defined in the purchase agreement.

Use

In addition, the purchase agreement requires earn-out payments to be made in cash based on performance after each of Estimatesthe first and second anniversary of the acquisition date. The Company is obligated to pay the former owners of Veracity contingent consideration if certain earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) requirements are achieved. In determining the fair value of the contingent consideration liability, the Company used the Monte Carlo simulation modeling which included the application of an appropriate discount rate (Level 3 fair value). The Company remeasures the fair value of the contingent consideration at each reporting period, and any change in fair value is be recognized in the Company’s results of operations in the applicable period. The estimate of fair value of contingent consideration requires very subjective assumptions to be made, including various potential EBITDA results and discount rates. Future revisions to these assumptions could materially change the estimate of the fair value of contingent consideration and therefore could materially affect the Company’s future operating results.

During the quarter ended August 24, 2019, the Company made an initial provisional allocation of the purchase price for Veracity based on the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the residual amount recorded as goodwill, in accordance with ASC 805,  Business Combinations. The Company’s initial purchase price allocation considered a number of factors, including the valuation of identifiable intangible assets and contingent consideration. During the three months ended November 23, 2019, the Company adjusted the previously reported provisional allocation of the purchase price to reflect new information obtained during the quarter, which resulted in changes in expected future performance and cash flows as of the acquisition date. There were no additional adjustments to the provisional purchase price allocation during the remaining periods in fiscal year ended May 30, 2020.

The preparationfollowing table provides a summary of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reportedadjusted provisional purchase price allocation.

Fair value of consideration transferred (in thousands):

Cash

$

32,314 

Estimated initial contingent consideration

6,290 

Total

$

38,604 

47


Recognized provisional amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):

Cash and cash equivalents

$

2,056 

Accounts receivable

3,299 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

116 

Intangible assets:

Backlog (17 months useful life)

1,210 

Customer relationships (7 years useful life)

9,300 

Trademarks (3 years useful life)

570 

Property and equipment

117 

Total identifiable assets

16,668 

Accounts payable

305 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

712 

Total liabilities assumed

1,017 

Net identifiable assets acquired

15,651 

Goodwill

22,953 

Net assets acquired

$

38,604 

The remeasured purchase price allocation above may be subject to further adjustments during the measurement period if new information is obtained about facts and disclosurecircumstances that existed as of contingentthe acquisition date. A final determination of fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed relating to the acquisition could differ from the stated purchase price allocation.

During fiscal 2020, the fair value of the Veracity contingent consideration increased by $1.3 million.  Such amounts were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.  As of May 30, 2020, this contingent consideration liability was $7.6 million, of which $5.0 million was included in Other current liabilities and $2.6 million was included in Other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Results of operations of Veracity are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition. Veracity contributed $18.8 million to consolidated revenue and $4.1 million to income from operations during fiscal 2020.  The Company incurred $0.6 million in acquisition costs which were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during fiscal 2020.

Prior Year Acquisitions

During fiscal 2018, the Company completed two acquisitions. The first acquisition, completed August 31, 2017 (the second quarter of fiscal 2018), was of taskforce – Management on Demand AG(“taskforce”), a German based professional services firm founded in 2007, that provided clients with senior interim management and project management expertise. Subsequent to the acquisition, taskforce continues to operate as a separate brand. The Company paid initial consideration of €5.8 million (approximately $6.9 million at the date of acquisition) in a combination of cash and restricted stock.

The following table summarizes the financial statements consideration for the acquisition of taskforce and the reported amounts of revenuesthe identified assets acquired and expenses duringliabilities assumed at the reporting period. Although management believes these estimatesacquisition date:

Fair Value of Consideration Transferred (in thousands, except share and assumptions are adequate, actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)per share amounts):



3. Property

Cash

$

4,384 

Working capital adjustment -receivable

(123)

Common stock - 226,628 shares @ $11.48 (closing price on acquisition date discounted for restriction on sale)

2,602 

Estimated initial contingent consideration

6,514 

Total

$

13,377 

48


Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the followingliabilities assumed (in thousands):



   As of
May 27, 2017
   As of
May 28, 2016
 

Building and land

  $14,198   $14,172 

Computers, equipment and software

   17,811    16,568 

Leasehold improvements

   19,403    21,170 

Furniture

   9,653    10,306 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   61,065    62,216 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (37,711   (40,942
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $23,354   $21,274 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

974 

Accounts receivable

1,930 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

45 

Intangible assets

5,727 

Property and equipment

39 

Total identifiable assets

8,715 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

2,116 

Accrued salaries and related obligations

16 

Other current liabilities

140 

Total liabilities assumed

2,272 

Net identifiable assets acquired

6,443 

Deferred tax liability

(1,815)

Goodwill

8,749 

Net assets acquired

$

13,377 

In addition, the purchase agreement for taskforce required additional earn-out payments to be made based on performance in calendar years 2017, 2018 and 2019. Under accounting rules for business combinations, obligations that are contingently payable to the sellers based upon the occurrence of one or more future events are recorded as a discounted liability on the Company’s balance sheet. The Company was obligated to pay the sellers in Euros as follows: for calendar year 2017, Adjusted EBITDA times 6.1 times 20%; and for both calendar years 2018 and 2019, Adjusted EBITDA times 6.1 times 15%; (Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as defined in the purchase agreement). The Company estimated the fair value of the obligation to pay the remaining contingent consideration based on a number of different projections of the estimated Adjusted EBITDA for the year. Each reporting period, the Company estimates changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and any change in fair value is recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The estimate of fair value of contingent consideration requires very subjective assumptions to be made of various potential Adjusted EBITDA results and discount rates. During the year ended May 25, 2019, the Company decreased the remaining estimated contingent consideration for calendar year 2019 by €523,000  ($590,000) and also recognized accretion expense on the discounted liability. These amounts are included in SG&A for the respective periods. During the year ended May 30, 2020, the Company did not have any material adjustment to the contingent consideration liability relating to taskforce.  Results of operations of taskforce are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition.

The payment for calendar year 2017 of €2.1 million (approximately $2.6 million) was made on March 28, 2018. The payment for calendar year 2018 of €1.6 million (approximately $1.9 million) was made on March 27, 2019. A final contingent consideration payment of €1.6 million ($1.8 million) was made on March 30, 2020.

The second acquisition occurred December 4, 2017 (the third quarter of fiscal 2018) when the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Accretive Solutions, Inc. (“Accretive”). Accretive was a professional services firm that provided expertise in accounting and finance, enterprise governance, business technology and business transformation solutions to a wide variety of organizations in the U.S. and supported startups through its Countsy suite of back office services. The Company paid consideration of $20.0 million in cash and issued 1,072,000 shares of Resources Connection, Inc. common stock restricted for sale for four years.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Accretive and the amounts of the identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date (in thousands, except number of shares and per share amount):

Cash

$

20,047 

Common stock - 1,072,474 shares @ $10.96 (closing price on acquisition date discounted for restriction on sale)

11,754 

Total

$

31,801 

49


Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):

Accounts receivable

$

11,360 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

1,084 

Intangible assets

15,200 

Property and equipment

979 

Total identifiable assets

28,623 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

3,649 

Accrued salaries and related obligations

4,562 

Other current liabilities

136 

Total liabilities assumed

8,347 

Net identifiable assets acquired

20,276 

Goodwill

11,525 

Net assets acquired

$

31,801 

On October 14, 2019, the Company reached a final settlement on a pre-acquisition claim with the seller of Accretive. As a part of the settlement, the Company issued 82,762 shares of common stock to the seller and received $0.6 million in cash from the escrow. The resulting gain of $0.5 million was included in Other income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended May 30, 2020.

Dispositions

On September 2, 2019, the Company completed the sale of certain assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiary, Resources Global Professionals Sweden AB, to Capacent Holding AB (publ), a Swedish public company, for SEK1,016,862 (approximately $105,000) in cash, resulting in a loss on sale of assets of approximately $38,000. As a part the sale, the Company transferred the majority of its local customer contracts, the existing office lease as well as all its employee consultants. As a result of the sale, the nearby Denmark and Norway markets also discontinued serving local Sweden customer contracts. The Company expects to continue to serve its global client base and to a lesser extent, its remaining local client contracts, in Sweden and Denmark.

In addition, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company discontinued its operations in Belgium, Luxembourg and Norway. All three legal entities were dissolved as of the end of fiscal 2020. In connection with the foregoing sale of assets and exit activities, the Company incurred costs of approximately $0.7 million primarily related to employee termination benefits. Such expenses were included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended May 30, 2020. None of the markets sold or exited are considered strategic components of the Company’s operations. 

In connection with exiting the above-mentioned entities, the Company analyzed the facts and circumstances regarding its historical and current investments, along with its associated accounting and tax positions. Based on the analysis, the Company recorded a tax benefit related to the worthless stock loss in the investment in its wholly owned subsidiaries as well as worthless loans to these subsidiaries. See Note 8 – Income taxes.

4. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The following table presents details of ourthe Company’s intangible assets, estimated lives and related accumulated amortization (in thousands):



   As of May 27, 2017   As of May 28, 2016 
   Gross   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net   Gross   Accumulated
Amortization
  Net 

Trade name and trademark (5 years)

  $—     $—     $—     $1,341   $(1,341 $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



As of May 30, 2020

 

As of May 25, 2019

 



 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 



Gross

 

Amortization

 

Net

 

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Net

 

Customer contracts and relationships (3-8 years)

$

23,779 

 

$

(6,707)

 

$

17,072 

 

 

$

14,495 

 

$

(3,439)

 

$

11,056 

 

Tradenames (3-10 years)

 

4,960 

 

 

(2,735)

 

 

2,225 

 

 

 

4,407 

 

 

(1,563)

 

 

2,844 

 

Backlog (17 months)

 

1,210 

 

 

(694)

 

 

516 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Consultant list (3 years)

 

776 

 

 

(718)

 

 

58 

 

 

 

783 

 

 

(462)

 

 

321 

 

Non-compete agreements (3 years)

 

888 

 

 

(821)

 

 

67 

 

 

 

896 

 

 

(528)

 

 

368 

 

Computer software (2 years)

 

185 

 

 

(46)

 

 

139 

 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Total

$

31,798 

 

$

(11,721)

 

$

20,077 

 

 

$

20,581 

 

$

(5,992)

 

$

14,589 

 

50


The weighted-average useful lives of the customer contracts and relationships, tradenames and backlog are approximately  7.2 years, 5.7 years, and 1.4 years, respectively. The weighted-average useful life of all of the Company’s intangible assets is 6.5 years.

The following table summarizes amortization expense for the years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015stated (in thousands):



   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
 

Amortization expense

  $—     $90   $918 

As of May 27, 2017, all of the Company’s



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

For the Years Ended



 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,



 

2020

 

2019

 

2018



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense

 

$

5,745 

 

$

3,799 

 

$

2,298 

The following table presents future estimated amortization expense based on existing intangible assets subject to amortization have been fully amortized.(in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Fiscal Years



 

 

2021

 

 

2022

 

 

2023

 

 

2024

 

 

2025

Expected amortization expense

 

$

4,602 

 

$

3,336 

 

$

3,138 

 

$

3,101 

 

$

3,101 

The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s goodwill balance (in thousands):



   For the Years Ended 
       May 27,    
2017
       May 28,    
2016
 

Goodwill, beginning of year

  $171,183   $170,878 

Impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes

   (95   305 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Goodwill, end of period

  $171,088   $171,183 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 



For the Years Ended



May 30,

 

May 25,



2020

 

2019

Goodwill, beginning of year

$

190,815 

 

$

191,950 

Acquisitions (see Note 3)

 

23,487 

 

 

 -

Impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes

 

(235)

 

 

(1,135)

Goodwill, end of period

$

214,067 

 

$

190,815 

5. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of

 

As of



 

May 30, 2020

 

May 25, 2019

Building and land

 

$

14,244 

 

$

14,227 

Computers, equipment and software

 

 

18,102 

 

 

20,042 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

19,903 

 

 

22,074 

Furniture

 

 

10,256 

 

 

11,260 



 

 

62,505 

 

 

67,603 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(38,861)

 

 

(40,971)



 

$

23,644 

 

$

26,632 

6. Leases

The Company currently leases office space, vehicles and certain equipment under operating leases expiring through 2028. At May 30, 2020, the Company had no finance leases. The Company’s operating leases are primarily for real estates, which include fixed payments plus, in some cases, scheduled base rent increases over the term of the lease. Certain leases require variable payments of common area maintenance, operating expenses and real estate taxes applicable to the property. Variable payments are excluded from the measurements of lease liabilities and are expensed as incurred. Any tenant improvement allowances received from the lessor are recorded as a reduction to rent expense over the term of the lease. None of the Company’s lease agreements contained residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. The Company has not entered into any real estate lease arrangements where it occupies the entire building. As such, the Company does not have any separate land lease components embedded within any of its real estate leases.

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at the inception of the contract. Specially, the Company considers whether it can control the underlying asset and have the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits or outputs from the assets. The ROU assets represent the right to use the underlying assets for the lease term and the lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the leases. The Company’s lease liability is recognized as of the lease commencement date at the present value of the lease payments over the lease term. The Company’s ROU asset is recognized as of the lease commencement date at the amount of the corresponding lease liability, adjusted for prepaid lease payments, lease incentives received, and initial direct costs

51


incurred. The Company evaluates its ROU assets for impairment consistent with its impairment of long-lived assets policy. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. ROU assets are presented as operating right-of-use assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 30, 2020. Operating lease liabilities are presented as operating lease liabilities, current or operating lease liabilities, noncurrent in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet based on their contractual due dates. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and is recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate that can be readily determined. Therefore, the Company uses a discount rate based on its incremental borrowing rate and the information available at the commencement date. The incremental borrowing rate is the rate of interest that the Company would have to pay to borrow on a fully collateralized basis over a similar term in an amount equal to the total lease payments in a similar economic environment. The Company has a centrally managed treasury function; therefore, the portfolio approach is applied in determining the incremental borrowing rate. Application at the portfolio level is not materially different from applying guidance at the individual lease level.

Certain of the Company’s leases include one or more options to renew or terminate the lease at the Company’s discretion. Generally, the renewal and termination options are not included in the ROU assets and lease liabilities as they are not reasonably certain of exercise. The Company regularly evaluates lease renewal and termination options and, when they are reasonably certain of exercise, includes the renewal or termination option in the lease term.

In some instances, the Company subleases excess office space to third party tenants. The Company, as sublessor, continues to account for the head lease under the provisions of the adopted lease accounting standard described in Note 2 –  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. If the lease cost for the term of the sublease exceeds the Company’s anticipated sublease income for the same period, this indicates that the right-of-use asset associated with the head lease should be assessed for impairment under the long-lived asset impairment provisions. Sublease income is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company has elected the practical expedient that allows lessees to choose to not separate lease and non-lease components by class of underlying asset and is applying this expedient to all real estate asset classes. Additionally, the Company has also made an accounting policy election to recognize the lease payments under short-term leases as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term without recognizing the lease liability and the ROU asset.

Lease cost components are included within selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended

May 30, 2020

Operating lease cost

$

12,308 

Short-term lease cost

345 

Variable lease cost

2,808 

Sublease income

(610)

Total lease cost

$

14,851 

The weighted average lease terms and discount rates for operating leases at May 30, 2020 are presented in the following table:

As of

May 30, 2020

Weighted average remaining lease term

4.3 years

Weighted average discount rate

4.09% 

Cash flow and other information related to operating leases is included in the following table for the year ended May 30, 2020  (in thousands): 

For the Year Ended

May 30, 2020

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities

$

13,311 

ROU assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease obligations

$

3,452 

52


Future maturities of operating lease liabilities at May 30, 2020 are presented in the following table (in thousands):

Years Ending:

Operating Lease Maturity

May 29, 2021

$

12,610 

May 28, 2022

10,942 

May 27, 2023

8,584 

May 25, 2024

7,046 

May 31, 2025

3,412 

Thereafter

3,168 

Total minimum payments

$

45,762 

Less: interest

(3,867)

Present value of operating lease liabilities

$

41,895 

The Company leases approximately 13,000 square feet of the approximately 57,000 square feet  of a Company owned building located in Irvine, California to independent third parties and has operating lease agreements for sub-let space with independent third parties expiring through fiscal 2025. Rental income received for the years ended May 30, 2020, May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2018 totaled $210,000, $240,000 and $305,000, respectively. Under the terms of these operating lease agreements, rental income from such third-party leases is expected to be $204,000, $219,000, $225,000,  $232,000 and $78,000 in fiscal 2021 through 2025, respectively.

7. Long-Term Debt

In October 2016, the Company entered into a $120the $120.0 million secured revolving credit facility (“Facility”)Facility with Bank of America, consisting of (i) a $90$90.0 million revolving loan facility (“Revolving Loan”), which includes a $5$5.0 million sublimit for the issuance of standby letters of credit, (“Revolving Loan”), and (ii) a $30$30.0 million reducing revolving loan facility (“Reducing Revolving Loan”), any amounts of which may not be

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

reborrowed after being repaid (“Reducing Revolving Loan”).repaid. The Facility is available for working capital and general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions and stock repurchases. OurThe Company’s obligations under the Facility are guaranteed by all of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries and secured by essentially all assets of the Company, Resources Connection LLC and their respective domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain customary exclusions. Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at a rate per annum of either, at the Company’s option, (i) a London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) defined in the Facility plus a margin of 1.25% or 1.50% or (ii) an alternate base rate, plus a margin a of 0.25% or 0.50% with the applicable margin depending on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. The alternate base rate is the highest of (i) Bank of America’s prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.0%. The Company pays an unused commitment fee on the average daily unused portion of the Facility at a rate of 0.15% to 0.25% depending upon on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. The Facility expires on October 17, 2021.

In November 2016, the Company borrowed $58.0 million under the Facility to fund a portion of the purchase price of its modified Dutch auction tender offer. See Note 9 —Stockholders’ Equity, for additional information about the tender offer. During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company reduced the amount borrowed by $10.0 million. As of May 27, 2017, the outstanding balance on the Facility is $49.0 million, including $1.0 million of outstanding letters of credit issued under the Facility. There is $41.0 million remaining to borrow under the Revolving Loan and $30.0 million remaining under the Reducing Revolving Loan. As of May 27, 2017, the interest rate on the Company’s borrowings was 2.5% on one tranche of $24.0 million based on a1-month LIBOR plus 1.5% and 2.65% on a second tranche of $24.0 million based on a3-month LIBOR plus 1.5%.

The Facility contains both affirmative and negative covenants. Covenants include, but are not limited to, limitations on the Company’s and its subsidiariessubsidiaries’ ability to incur liens, incur additional indebtedness, make certain restricted payments, merge or consolidate and make dispositions of assets. In addition, the Facility requires usthe Company to comply with financial covenants limiting the Company’s total funded debt, minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratio. The Company was in compliancecompliant with all financial covenants under the Facility as of May 27, 2017.30, 2020.

Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Facility, the lender may cease making loans, terminate the Facility and declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and payable. The Facility specifies a number of events of default (some of which are subject to applicable grace or cure periods), including, among other things,non-payment defaults, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, bankruptcy and insolvency defaults and material judgment defaults.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)The Company’s borrowings under the Facility were $88.0 million and $43.0 million as of May 30, 2020 and May 25, 2019,  respectively. In addition, the Company had $1.3 million of outstanding letters of credit issued under the Facility as of both May 30, 2020 and May 25, 2019. There was $0.7 million remaining capacity under the Revolving Loan and $30.0 million remaining capacity under the Reducing Revolving Loan as of May 30, 2020. As of May 30, 2020, the interest rates on the Company’s borrowings under the Facility ranged from 2.14% to 2.25%.

 

6.

53


8. Income Taxes

The following table represents the current and deferred income tax provision for federal, state and foreign income taxes attributable to operations (in thousands):

 

   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
 

Current

      

Federal

  $10,901   $18,320   $18,046 

State

   2,551    4,168    4,028 

Foreign

   1,472    1,398    1,101 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   14,924    23,886    23,175 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred

      

Federal

   259    (178   (502

State

   62    (27   (120

Foreign

   (123   (135   345 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   198    (340   (277
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $15,122   $23,546   $22,898 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended



 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018

Current

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

3,038 

 

$

5,068 

 

$

10,785 

State

 

 

1,302 

 

 

2,278 

 

 

2,829 

Foreign

 

 

1,686 

 

 

2,690 

 

 

(392)



 

 

6,026 

 

 

10,036 

 

 

13,222 

Deferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

874 

 

 

5,890 

 

 

(3,011)

State

 

 

245 

 

 

619 

 

 

367 

Foreign

 

 

(202)

 

 

(46)

 

 

(515)



 

 

917 

 

 

6,463 

 

 

(3,159)



 

$

6,943 

 

$

16,499 

 

$

10,063 

Income before provision for income taxes is as follows (in thousands):

 

   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
 

Domestic

  $32,390   $53,417   $51,997 

Foreign

   1,383    572    (1,591
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $33,773   $53,989   $50,406 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended



 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018

Domestic

 

$

36,148 

 

$

41,828 

 

$

26,774 

Foreign

 

 

(920)

 

 

6,141 

 

 

2,115 



 

$

35,228 

 

$

47,969 

 

$

28,889 

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount that would result from applying the federal statutory rate as follows:

 

   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
  May 28,
2016
  May 30,
2015
 

Statutory tax rate

   35.0  35.0  35.0

State taxes, net of federal benefit

   5.0   4.9   5.0 

Non-U.S. rate adjustments

   0.1   0.4   1.1 

Stock-based compensation

   0.7   0.6   0.5 

Valuation allowance

   1.2   1.3   2.8 

Permanent items, primarily meals and entertainment

   2.2   1.5   1.3 

Other, net

   0.6   (0.1  (0.3
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective tax rate

   44.8  43.6  45.4
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended



 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018

Statutory tax rate

 

21.0 

%

 

21.0 

%

 

29.4 

%

State taxes, net of federal benefit

 

3.6 

 

 

4.9 

 

 

7.9 

 

Non-U.S. rate adjustments

 

0.9 

 

 

1.3 

 

 

(0.8)

 

Stock-based compensation

 

3.2 

 

 

2.8 

 

 

4.5 

 

Long-term net capital gains

 

 -

 

 

(6.1)

 

 

10.1 

 

Foreign tax credit

 

 -

 

 

9.3 

 

 

(16.5)

 

Valuation allowance

 

4.1 

 

 

(2.8)

 

 

(4.3)

 

Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income ("GILTI")

 

0.9 

 

 

1.1 

 

 

 -

 

Worthless Stock Deduction

 

(14.8)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Worthless Debt Deduction

 

(2.6)

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

FIN48

 

1.6 

 

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

Permanent items, primarily meals and entertainment

 

2.0 

 

 

1.4 

 

 

3.2 

 

Deferred tax impact of U.S. federal rate changes

 

 -

 

 

0.1 

 

 

(2.8)

 

Deferred tax impact of foreign rate changes

 

(0.2)

 

 

1.2 

 

 

3.9 

 

Other, net

 

 -

 

 

0.2 

 

 

0.2 

 

Effective tax rate

 

19.7 

%

 

34.4 

%

 

34.8 

%

The impact of state taxes, net of federal benefit, and foreign income taxed at other than U.S. rates fluctuates year over year due to the changes in the mix of operating income and losses amongst the various states and foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

54

 


The components of the net deferred tax asset (liability) consist of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

As of

 

May 30,

 

May 25,

  As of
May 27,
2017
   As of
May 28,
2016
 

 

2020

 

2019

Deferred tax assets:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

  $1,595   $1,685 

 

$

1,158 

 

$

1,108 

Accrued compensation

   4,235    4,337 

 

3,716 

 

 

3,347 

Accrued expenses

   3,755    3,163 

 

2,652 

 

 

2,418 

Stock options and restricted stock

   11,779    15,132 

 

4,870 

 

 

5,541 

Foreign tax credit

   397    557 

 

567 

 

 

498 

Net operating losses

   15,855    15,283 

 

12,018 

 

 

14,489 

Property and equipment

   1,222    1,550 

State taxes

   232    368 

 

 

70 

 

 

208 
  

 

   

 

 

Gross deferred tax asset

   39,070    42,075 

 

 

25,051 

 

 

27,609 

Valuation allowance

   (15,971   (15,714

 

 

(11,069)

 

 

(13,190)
  

 

   

 

 

Gross deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance

   23,099    26,361 

 

 

13,982 

 

 

14,419 
  

 

   

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

(547)

 

 

(77)

Outside basis difference - Sweden investment

 

 

(263)

 

 

 -

Goodwill and intangibles

   (23,406   (22,124

 

 

(17,790)

 

 

(17,991)
  

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

  $(307  $4,237 
  

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(4,618)

 

$

(3,649)

The Company had a net income tax receivable of $1.4$3.5 million and a net income tax payable of $0.4$1.0 million as of May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016,25, 2019, respectively.

The tax benefit associated with the exercise of nonqualified stock options and the disqualifying dispositions by employees of incentive stock options, restricted stock awards and shares issued under the Company’s ESPP reduced income taxes payable by $1.1$0.9 million and $1.8 million for both of the years ended May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016,25, 2019, respectively.

The Company has foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $63.5$53.2 million and foreign tax credit carryforwards of $0.4$0.6 million. The foreign tax credits will expire beginning in fiscal 2023. The following table summarizes the net operating loss expiration periods.



Expiration Periods

  Amount of Net Operating Losses 
   (in thousands) 

Fiscal Years Ending:

  

2018

  $300 

2019

   550 

2020

   1,600 

2021

   4,600 

2022

   350 

2023-2027

   3,500 

Unlimited

   52,600 
  

 

 

 
  $63,500 
  

 

 

 

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



 

 

 

Expiration Periods

 

Amount of Net Operating Losses

Fiscal Years Ending:

 

(in thousands)

2021

 

$

3,936 

2022

 

 

154 

2023

 

 

251 

2024

 

 

2,312 

2025

 

 

540 

2026-2029

 

 

1,917 

Unlimited

 

 

44,083 



 

$

53,193 



The following table summarizes the activity in our valuation allowance accounts (in thousands):

 

   Beginning
Balance
   Charged to
Operations
   Currency
Rate
Changes
   Ending
Balance
 

Years Ended:

        

May 30, 2015

  $16,719   $1,189   $(2,852  $15,056 

May 28, 2016

  $15,056   $691   $(33  $15,714 

May 27, 2017

  $15,714   $438   $(181  $15,971 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency

 

 

 



 

Beginning

 

Charged to

 

Rate

 

Ending



 

Balance

 

Operations

 

Changes

 

Balance

Years Ended:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 26, 2018

 

$

15,971 

 

$

(1,181)

 

$

508 

 

$

15,298 

May 25, 2019

 

$

15,298 

 

$

(1,440)

 

$

(668)

 

$

13,190 

May 30, 2020

 

$

13,190 

 

$

(1,919)

 

$

(202)

 

$

11,069 

Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon generating sufficient future taxable income. Management believes that it is more likely than not that all other remaining deferred tax assets will be realized through future taxable earnings or alternative tax strategies.

55


Deferred income taxes have not been provided on the undistributed earnings of approximately $18.4$21.1 million from the Company’s foreign subsidiaries as of May 27, 201730, 2020 since these amounts are intended to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations. If the earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries were to be distributed, management estimates that the income tax impact would be immaterial as a result of the transition tax and federal taxes would be offset withdividends received deduction for foreign tax credits.source earnings provided under the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

The following table summarizes the activity related to the gross unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):



   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
 

Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year

  $42   $42 

Grossincreases-tax positions in prior period

   —      —   

Grossdecreases-tax positions in prior period

   —      —   

Gross increases-current period tax positions

   —      —   

Settlements

   —      —   

Lapse of statute of limitations

   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year

  $42   $42 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended



 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

 

2020

 

2019

Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year

 

$

42 

 

$

42 

Gross decreases-tax positions in prior period

 

 

(42)

 

 

 -

Gross increases-current period tax positions

 

 

848 

 

 

 -

Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year

 

$

848 

 

$

42 

The Company’s total liability for unrecognized gross tax benefits was $848,000 and $42,000 as of both May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016,25, 2019, respectively; which, if ultimately recognized, would impact the effective tax rate in future periods. The unrecognized tax benefits includeare included in long-term liabilities of $42,000 as of both May 27, 2017 and May 28, 2016; nonein the Consolidated Balance Sheets. None of the unrecognized tax benefits are short-term liabilities due to the closing of the statute of limitations.

The Company’s major income tax jurisdiction is the U.S., with federal statutestatutes of limitations remaining open for fiscal 20142017 and thereafter. For states within the U.S. in which the Company does significant business, the Company remains subject to examination for fiscal 20132016 and thereafter. Major foreign jurisdictions in Europe remain open for fiscal years ended 20122015 and thereafter.

The Company continues to recognizerecognizes interest expense and penalties related to incomeunrecognized tax benefits as a part of its provision for income taxes. WhileDuring the amount accrued during the current fiscal year is immaterial,ended May 30, 2020, the Company has provided $1,000 of accrueddid not accrue for any interest and penalties as a component of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



7.

56


9. Accrued Salaries and Related Obligations

Accrued salaries and related obligations consist of the following (in thousands):

 

   As of
May 27,
2017
   As of
May 28,
2016
 

Accrued salaries and related obligations

  $18,741   $18,166 

Accrued bonuses

   15,600    17,092 

Accrued vacation

   14,900    14,897 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $49,241   $50,155 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

8.



 

 

 

 

 

 



 

As of

 

As of



 

May 30,

 

May 25,



 

2020

 

2019

Accrued salaries and related obligations

 

$

14,795 

 

$

19,667 

Accrued bonuses

 

 

17,897 

 

 

20,645 

Accrued vacation

 

 

19,715 

 

 

18,316 



 

$

52,407 

 

$

58,628 

10. Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company currently maintains cash and cash equivalent balances, short-term investmentsequivalents in commercial paper and U.S. government agency securities with high credit quality financial institutions. At times, such balances are in excess of federally insured limits.or money market accounts. 

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of trade receivables. However, concentrations of credit risk are limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across different business and geographic areas. The Company monitors its exposure to credit losses and maintains an allowance for anticipated losses. A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of one or more of the Company’s customers could result in an increase in the allowance for anticipated losses. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenue for the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020,  May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 26, 2018. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of trade accounts receivable as of May 30, 2015.2020 and May 25, 2019.

9.

11. Stockholders’ Equity

The Company has 70,000,000 authorized shares of common stock with a $0.01 par value. At May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016,25, 2019, there were 29,662,00032,144,000 and 36,229,00031,588,000 shares of common stock outstanding, respectively, all of which provide the holders with voting rights.

The Company has authorized for issuance 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a $0.01 par value per share. The board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock in one or more series and to determine the related rights and preferences. No shares of preferred stock were outstanding as of May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016.25, 2019.

Tender Offer for Common Stock

In October 2016, the Company commenced a modified Dutch auction tender offer to purchase up to 6,000,000 shares of common stock at a price not greater than $16.00 per share and not less than $13.50 per share. In November 2016, the Company exercised its right to increase the size of the tender offer by up to 2.0% of its outstanding common stock. The tender offer period expired on November 15, 2016 and on November 22, 2016, the Company purchased 6,515,264 shares of its common stock at a per share price of $16.00, excluding transaction costs, for approximately $104.2 million. These shares are currently held as treasury stock. The tender offer was funded through borrowings of $58.0 million under the Facility and the remainder with cash on hand.

Stock Repurchase Program

The Company’s board of directors has periodically approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the repurchase, at the discretion of the Company’s senior executives, of the Company’s common stock for a designated aggregate dollar limit. The current program was authorized in July 2015 (the “July 2015 program”) and set an aggregate dollar limit not to exceed

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

$150 $150 million. Use of the funds authorized under the July 2015 program commenced in February 2016 upon the exhaustion of the previous stock repurchase program of $150 million approved by the Company’s board of directors in April 2011. Repurchases under the program may take place in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions and may be made pursuant to a Rule10b5-1 plan. During the years ended May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 2016,25, 2019, the Company purchased on the open market approximately 0.80.3 million and 1.8 million shares of its common stock, respectively, at an average price of $15.99$15.70 and $15.32$16.17 per share, respectively, for approximately $13.5$5.0 million and $28.1$29.9 million, respectively. As of May 27, 2017,30, 2020,  approximately $125.1$85.1 million remainsremained available for future repurchases of ourthe Company’s common stock under the July 2015 program.

Quarterly Dividend

The Company’s

Subject to approval each quarter by its board of directors, has establishedthe Company pays a  quarterly dividend, subject to quarterly board of directors’ approval.regular dividend. On April 20, 2017,15, 2020, the board of directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.11$0.14 per share of ourthe Company’s common stock. The dividend, payablepaid on June 15, 2017,10, 2020, was accrued in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 27, 201730, 2020 for approximately $3.2$4.5 million. Continuation of the quarterly dividend will beis at the discretion of the board of directors and will dependdepends upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, general business condition, contractual restrictions contained in ourthe Company’s current credit agreements and other agreements, and other factors deemed relevant by the board of directors.

10.

12.  Restructuring Activities

On February 27, 2020, the Company’s management and board of directors committed to a global restructuring and business transformation plan (the “Plan”) centered on strengthening the business for greater agility and resilience in anticipation of macroeconomic volatility. The Plan consists of two key components: an effort to streamline the management structure and eliminate non-essential positions to focus on core solution offerings, improve efficiency and enhance the employee experience; and a strategic

57


rationalization of the Company’s physical geographic footprint and real estate spend to focus investment dollars in high growth core markets for greater impact.

As part of the Plan, the Company completed a reduction in force (the “RIF”) in early March in North America and Asia Pacific whereby it eliminated 73 positions. In connection with the RIF, the Company incurred $3.9 million of employee termination costs in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, of which $2.0 million was paid at the end of fiscal 2020. An additional $1.7 million is expected to be paid in fiscal 2021. The majority of employees impacted by the RIF exited the Company before the end of fiscal 2020, with the remainder expected to exit in the first half of fiscal 2021. The Company expects to incur and pay an additional $1.4 million of employee termination costs in fiscal 2021.

The real estate component of the Plan is specifically targeted to shrink the Company’s real estate footprint by 26% globally through either lease termination or subleasing. The Company exited from a number of leases during the fourth quarter resulting in $1.1 million of non-cash charges relating to lease terminations and other costs associated with exiting the facilities, of which $0.6 million was related to impairment of operating right-of-use assets and $0.5 million was related to loss on disposal of fixed assets. The Company currently expects to incur additional restructuring charges in fiscal 2021 as it continues to exit certain real estate leases in accordance with the Plan. The exact amount and timing will depend on a number of variables, including market conditions. Given the current macro environment, particularly the current shift away from commercial real estate occupancy, accelerated by the Pandemic, management believes it could take longer and be more costly to terminate and sublet the Company’s leases, therefore taking longer to realize the expected savings.

All of the employee termination costs and the facility exit costs associated with the Company’s restructuring initiatives are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended May 30, 2020. At May 30, 2020, unpaid employee termination benefits were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. During the first quarter of fiscal 2021, the Company started the strategic business review in Europe, and currently expects to substantially complete the review and restructuring in Europe in fiscal 2021.

13. Stock-Based Compensation Plans

2014 Performance Incentive Plan

On October 23, 2014,General

Executive officers and employees, as well as non-employee directors of the Company’s stockholders approvedCompany and certain  consultants and advisors to the Company, are eligible to participate in the 2014 Plan. The 2014 Plan was approved by stockholders on October 23, 2014 and replaced and succeeded in its entirety the Resources Connection, Inc. 2004 Performance Incentive Plan and the 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan (the(together, the “Prior Stock Plans”). The effective date of the 2014 Plan is September 3, 2014 and, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors, will terminate on September 2, 2024. Under the terms of the 2014 Plan, the Company’s board of directors or one or more committees appointed by the board of directors will administer the 2014 Plan. The board of directors has delegated general administrative authority for the 2014 Plan to the Compensation Committee of the board of directors.

The administrator of the 2014 Plan has broad authority to, among other things, select participants and determine the type(s) of award(s) that they are to receive, and determine the number of shares that are to be subject to awards and the terms and conditions of awards, including the price (if any) to be paid for the shares or the award. Persons eligible to receive awards under the 2014 Plan include officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, directors of the Company, and certain consultants and advisors to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued or transferred pursuant to awards under the 2014 Plan equals the sum of: (1) 2,400,000 shares, plus (2) the number of shares subject to stock options granted under the Prior Stock Plans and outstanding as of September 3, 2014 (the date at which the Prior Stock Plans terminated), which expire, or for any reason are cancelled or terminated, after that date without being exercised, plus (3) the number of shares subject to restricted stock, restricted stock units and other full-value awards granted under the Prior Stock Plans that were outstanding and unvested as of September 3, 2014, which are forfeited, terminated, cancelled, or otherwise reacquired after that date without having become vested. As of May 27, 2017, 2,767,00030, 2020, there were 1,453,000 shares were available for award grant purposes under the 2014 Plan, subject to future increases as described in (2) and (3) above and subject to increase as then-outstanding awards expire or terminate without having become vested or exercised, as applicable.the 2014 Plan.

The types of awards that may be granted

Awards under the 2014 Plan may include, but are not limited to, stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock bonuses, performance stock,grants, including restricted stock units phantom stock and other forms of awards granted or denominated inunder the Company’s common stock or units of the Company’s common stock, as well as certain cash bonus awards. Under the terms of the 2014 Plan, theDirectors Deferred Compensation Plan. Stock option price for the incentive stock options (“ISOs”) and nonqualified stock options (“NQSO”) may not be less than the fair market value of the shares of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. For ISOs, the exercise price per share may not be less than 110% of the fair

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

market value of a share of common stock on the grant date for any individual possessing more than 10% of the total outstanding stock of the Company. Stock options granted under the 2014 Plan and the Prior Stock Plansgrants generally become exercisablevest in equal annual installments over periods of one to four years and expire not more thanterminate ten years from the date of grant. The Company predominantly grants NQSOs to employees in the U.S. The Company granted 127,720 and 50,354 sharesRestricted stock award vesting is determined on an individual grant basis. Awards of restricted stock duringunder the fiscal years ended May 27, 20172014 Plan will be counted against the available share limit as two and May 28, 2016, respectively.a half shares for every one share actually issued in connection with the award. The Company’s policy is to issue shares from its authorized shares upon the exercise of stock options.

58


A summary of the share-based award activity during fiscal 2020 under the 2014 Plan and the Prior Stock Plans follows (amounts in thousands, except weighted average exercise price):



   Share-Based
Awards
Available for
Grant
  Number of
Shares
Under
Option
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life

(in years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Options outstanding at May 28, 2016

   3,206   7,347  $16.08    5.41   $10,109 

Granted, at fair market value

   (1,212  1,212   14.52     

Restricted stock (1)

   (319  —     —       

Exercised

   —     (305  12.59     

Forfeited (2)

   267   (265  14.18     

Expired

   825   (825  29.77     
  

 

 

  

 

 

      

Options outstanding at May 27, 2017

   2,767   7,164  $15.08    5.56   $1,696 
  

 

 

  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Exercisable at May 27, 2017

    4,608  $15.59    4.04   $1,173 
   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Vested and expected to vest at May 27, 2017 (3)

    6,962  $15.09    5.46   $1,696 
   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 



(1)Amounts represent restricted shares granted. Share-based awards available for grant are reduced by 2.5 shares for each share awarded as stock grants from the 2014 Plan.
(2)Amounts represent both stock options and restricted share awards forfeited.
(3)The expected to vest options are the result of applying thepre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to options not yet vested.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Share-Based

 

Number of

 

 

Weighted

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 



 

Awards

 

Shares

 

 

Average

 

Remaining

 

 

Aggregate



 

Available

 

Under

 

 

Exercise

 

Contractual Life

 

 

Intrinsic



 

for Grant

 

Option

 

 

Price

 

(in years)

 

 

Value

Awards outstanding at May 25, 2019

 

1,595 

 

6,029 

 

$

15.95 

 

6.06 

 

$

5,482 

Granted, at fair market value

 

(1,318)

 

1,318 

 

 

17.37 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted stock (1)

 

(71)

 

 -

 

 

 -

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 -

 

(376)

 

 

13.63 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited (2)

 

639 

 

(608)

 

 

17.41 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

608 

 

(608)

 

 

17.90 

 

 

 

 

 

Awards outstanding at May 30, 2020

 

1,453 

 

5,755 

 

$

16.07 

 

6.18 

 

$

 -

Exercisable at May 30, 2020

 

 

 

3,392 

 

$

15.10 

 

4.45 

 

$

 -

Vested and expected to vest at May 30, 2020 (3)

 

 

 

5,566 

 

$

16.00 

 

6.04 

 

$

 -

(1)Amounts represent restricted shares granted. Share-based awards available for grant are reduced by 2.5 shares for each share awarded as stock grants from the 2014 Plan.

(2)Amounts represent both stock options and restricted share awards forfeited. For stock options, represent one share for each stock option forfeited. For restricted share awards, represents 2.5 shares for each restricted share award forfeited.

(3)The expected to vest options are the result of applying the pre-vesting forfeiture rate assumptions to options not yet vested of 2,391,052 and 2,481,959 as of May 30, 2020 and May 25, 2019, respectively.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the totalpre-tax intrinsic value, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $12.65$10.99 as of May 26, 201729, 2020 (the last actual trading day of fiscal 2017)2020), which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.

The totalpre-tax intrinsic value related to stock options exercised during the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 30, 201526, 2018 was $1.1$1.2 million, $1.8$5.2 million and $1.2$1.7 million, respectively. The total estimated fair value of stock options that vested during the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 30, 201526, 2018 was $3.6$3.5 million, $4.0$5.4 million and $3.8$5.1 million, respectively.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



Valuation and Expense Information for Stock Based Compensation Plans

The following table summarizes the impact of the Company’s stock-based compensation plans. Stock-based compensation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses and consists of stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options, ESPP stock purchase rights and restricted stock (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
 

Income before income taxes

  $(6,068  $(6,280  $(5,989
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $(3,962  $(4,159  $(3,823
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income per share:

      

Basic

  $(0.12  $(0.11  $(0.10
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

  $(0.12  $(0.11  $(0.10
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended



 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018

Income before income taxes

 

$

(6,057)

 

$

(6,570)

 

$

(6,033)

Net income

 

$

(5,865)

 

$

(6,539)

 

$

(5,697)

Net income per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(0.18)

 

$

(0.21)

 

$

(0.19)

Diluted

 

$

(0.18)

 

$

(0.20)

 

$

(0.18)

59


Stock-based compensation expense in the table above includes compensation for restricted shares of $1.1 million, $1.7 million and $1.4 million for the years ended May 30, 2020, May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2018, respectively.

The weighted average estimated fair value per share of employee stock options granted during the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 30, 201526, 2018 was $3.61, $4.54$3.88,  $4.74 and $3.93,$3.61, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:

 

   For the Years Ended
   May 27, 2017  May 28, 2016  May 30, 2015

Expected volatility

  34.6% - 38.4%  35% - 40.5%  36.2% - 42.1%

Risk-free interest rate

  1.3% - 1.6%  1.7% - 2.0%  1.7% - 2.2%

Expected dividends

  3.0%  2.2%  1.9% - 2.1%

Expected life

  5.6 - 8.1 years  5.6 - 7.7 years  5.5 - 7.5 years



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended

 

May 30, 2020

 

May 25, 2019

 

May 26, 2018

Expected volatility

30.9% - 32.9%

 

31.6% - 34.7%

 

30.3% - 34.5%

Risk-free interest rate

1.5% - 1.8%

 

3.1% - 3.2%

 

2.1% - 2.4%

Expected dividends

3.4% - 3.7%

 

3.2%

 

3.1%

Expected life

5.6 - 8.1 years

 

5.7 - 8.3 years

 

5.7 - 8.2 years

The following table summarizes the activity for restricted stock during fiscal 2020:

Total Number of Shares

Unvested restricted shares outstanding at May 25, 2019

158,926 

Granted

28,372 

Vested

(84,891)

Forfeited

(12,500)

Unvested restricted shares outstanding at May 30, 2020

89,907 

As of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, there was $7.0$7.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related tonon-vested employee stock options granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 31 months. Stock-based compensation expense included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and1.76 years. At May 30, 2015 was $6.1 million, $6.3 million and $6.0 million, respectively; this consisted of stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options, employee stock purchases made via the Company’s ESPP and issuances of restricted stock. Also included in the stock-based compensation expense for the year ended May 28, 2016 was approximately $900,000 related to the accelerated vesting of options held by Donald Murray in connection with his transition from Executive Chairman to Chairman.

Stock-based compensation expense in the tables above includes compensation for restricted shares of $802,000, $598,000 and $515,000 for the years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015, respectively. The Company granted 127,720, 50,354 and 49,840 shares of restricted stock for the years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015, respectively. There were 43,261 and 41,796 restricted shares that vested in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. There were 189,015, 105,925 and 97,938 unvested restricted shares as of May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015, respectively. At May 27, 2017,2020, there was approximately $2.7$1.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted shares, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 32 months.

Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense are recognized as an increase to additionalpaid-in capital and tax shortfalls are recognized as income tax expense unless there are excess tax benefits from previous equity awards to which the shortfall can be offset. On the adoption date of the required accounting for stock-based compensation expense, the Company calculated the amount of eligible excess tax benefits available to offset future tax shortfalls in accordance with the long-form method.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)1.70 years.



The Company recognizes compensation expense for only the portion of stock options and restricted stock units that are expected to vest, rather than recording forfeitures when they occur. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from that estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On October 23, 2014,15, 2019, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the ESPP to extend2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2019 ESPP” or the term of“ESPP”) which supersedes the ESPP through October 16, 2024, and to increase2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2014 ESPP” or the “ESPP”). The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock authorized for issuance under the 2019 ESPP by an additional 1.5 million shares.is 1,825,000. The remaining 6,000 unissued shares under the 2014 ESPP are no longer available for issuance.

The Company’s ESPP allows qualified employees (as defined in the ESPP) to purchase designated shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of common stock at the beginning or end of each semi-annual stock purchase period. After approval of the amendment, a total of 5.9 million shares of common stock may be issued under the ESPP. The Company issued 359,000, 325,000400,000, 358,000 and 337,000339,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the ESPP for the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 30, 2015,26, 2018, respectively. There are 918,000were 1,641,000 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2019 ESPP as of May 27, 2017.30, 2020.

11.

14. Benefit Plan

The Company has a defined contribution 401(k) plan (“the plan”) which covers all employees in the U.S. who have completed 90 days of service and are age 21 or older. Participants may contribute up to 50% of their annual salary up to the maximum amount allowed by statute. As defined in the plan agreement, the Company may make matching contributions in such amount, if any, up to a maximum of 6% of individual employees’ annual compensation. The Company, at its sole discretion, determines the matching contribution made from quarter to quarter. To receive matching contributions, the employee must be employed on the last business day of the fiscal quarter. For the years ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, May 28, 201625, 2019 and May 30, 2015,26, 2018, the Company contributed approximately $5.1$6.5 million, $5.0$6.4 million and $4.8$5.6 million, respectively, to the plan as Company matching contributions.

12.

60


15. Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

Additional information regarding cash flows is as follows (in thousands):

 

   For the Years Ended 
   May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
 

Income taxes paid

  $16,756   $23,135   $24,326 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest paid

  $628   $—     $—   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

      

Capitalized leasehold improvements paid directly by landlord

  $1,026   $405   $144 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends declared, not paid

  $3,253   $3,623   $2,982 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Years Ended



May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018

Income taxes paid

$

8,258 

 

$

14,229 

 

$

10,601 

Interest paid

$

2,191 

 

$

2,440 

 

$

1,769 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Capitalized leasehold improvements paid directly by landlord

$

137 

 

$

2,312 

 

$

65 

Acquisition of Veracity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liability for contingent consideration

$

7,570 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Acquisition of Expertence:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liability for contingent consideration

$

328 

 

$

 -

 

$

 -

Acquisition of taskforce:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock

$

 -

 

$

 -

 

$

2,602 

Liability for contingent consideration

$

 -

 

$

2,195 

 

$

4,289 

Acquisition of Accretive:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Issuance of common stock

$

1,141 

 

$

 -

 

$

11,754 

Dividends declared, not paid

$

4,512 

 

$

4,105 

 

$

3,791 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.

16. Commitments and Contingencies

Lease Commitments and Purchase Obligations

At May 27, 2017, the Company had operating leases, expiring at various dates through March 2027, primarily for office premises, and purchase obligations, primarily for property and equipment. At May 27, 2017, the Company had no capital leases. Future minimum rental commitments under operating leases and other known purchase obligations are as follows (in thousands):Legal Proceedings



Years Ending:

  Operating
Leases
   Purchase
Obligations
 

May 26, 2018

  $10,537   $440 

May 25, 2019

   9,460    340 

May 30, 2020

   6,837    235 

May 29, 2021

   6,085    105 

May 28, 2022

   5,097    9 

Thereafter

   6,993    —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $45,009   $1,129 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Rent expense for the years ended May 27, 2017, May 28, 2016 and May 30, 2015 totaled $12.9 million, $13.1 million and $13.1 million, respectively. Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, including during any rent holiday periods.

The Company leases approximately 18,200 square feet of the approximately 56,200 square foot Company owned building located in Irvine, California to independent third parties and has operating lease agreements forsub-let space with independent third parties expiring through fiscal 2025. Under the terms of these operating lease agreements, rental income from such third party leases is expected to be $245,000, $201,000, $207,000, $213,000 and $219,000 in fiscal 2018 through 2022, respectively and $536,000 thereafter.

Employment Agreements

The Company’s employment agreement with its president and chief executive officer, Kate W. Duchene, has an initial term of three years ending on December 19, 2019 and renews forone-year periods commencing thereafter unless the Company or Ms. Duchene provides the other party written notice within 60 days of the then-current expiration date that the agreement will not be extended. The employment agreement provides Ms. Duchene with a specified severance amount depending on whether her separation from the Company is with or without good cause as defined in the agreement. The Company also has employment agreements with certain key members of management; these agreements automatically renew for additional one year periods unless the Company or the named executive provides the other party written notice no later than 60 days prior to the then-current expiration date that the agreement will not be extended. These agreements provide those employees with a specified severance amount depending on whether the employee is terminated with or without good cause as defined in the applicable agreement.

Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in certain legal matters in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, all such matters, if disposed of unfavorably, would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

14.17. Segment Information and Enterprise Reporting

The Company discloses information regarding operations outside of the U.S. The Company operates as one segment. The accounting policies for the domestic and international operations are the same as those described in Note 2 -- Summary ofSignificant Accounting Policies. Summarized information regarding the Company’s domestic and international operations is shown in the following table. Amounts are stated in thousands:



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue for the Years Ended

 

Long-Lived Assets (1) as of

  Revenue for the For the Years Ended   Long-Lived Assets (1) as of 

 

May 30,

 

May 25,

 

May 26,

 

May 30,

 

May 25,

  May 27,
2017
   May 28,
2016
   May 30,
2015
       May 27,    
2017
       May 28,    
2016
 

 

2020

 

2019

 

2018

 

2020

 

2019

United States

  $469,846   $489,035   $479,972   $173,781   $172,155 

 

$

568,725 

 

$

575,641 

 

$

510,935 

 

$

254,649 

 

$

200,385 

The Netherlands

   16,569    15,859    15,777    18,036    17,728 

Other

   96,996    93,627    94,840    2,625    2,574 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

International

 

 

134,628 

 

 

153,358 

 

 

143,194 

 

 

37,426 

 

 

31,651 

Total

  $583,411   $598,521   $590,589   $194,442   $192,457 

 

$

703,353 

 

$

728,999 

 

$

654,129 

 

$

292,075 

 

$

232,036 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



(1)Long-lived assets are comprised of goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment.

 (1)Long-lived assets are comprised of goodwill, intangible assets,  property and equipment, and ROU assets.  

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

61


ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.



ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by SECRule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined inRule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of May 27, 2017.30, 2020. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of May 27, 2017.30, 2020.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange ActRule 13a-15(f). We maintain internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in the 2013Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included an assessment of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of May 27, 2017.30, 2020.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, RSM US LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, as stated in their report which is included in this Item 9A under the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

62


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Resources Connection, Inc.

Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Resources Connection, Inc.‘s and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2017,30, 2020, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. Resources Connection, Inc.’sIn our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of May 30, 2020 and subsidiaries’May 25, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 30, 2020, and our report dated July 27, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that(a) (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;(b) (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and(c) (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Resources Connection, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Resources Connection, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended May 27, 2017 and our report dated July 24, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ RSM US LLP

Irvine, California

July 24, 2017

27, 2020

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION.

63


ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III



ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Executive Officers and DirectorsITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Our board of directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors and employees, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions, as required by applicable rules of the SEC and NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market. The full text of our code of business conduct and ethics can be found on the investor relations page of our website atwww.rgp.com. www.rgp.com. We intend to disclose any amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of our code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors and executive officers, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on the investor relations page of our website atwww.rgp.com to the extent required by applicable SEC and NASDAQNasdaq rules.

Reference is made to the information regarding directors appearing in Section II under the caption “PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” and to the information under the captions “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,” “SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE,” “BOARD OF DIRECTORS” and “BOARD OF DIRECTORS — AUDIT COMMITTEE,” in each case in the Company’s proxy statement related to its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, which information is incorporated herein by reference.



ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information appearing under the captions “COMPENSATION“EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS,” “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION,” “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION,” “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES FOR FISCAL 2017,2020,” “POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL” and “BOARD OF DIRECTORS — DIRECTOR“DIRECTOR COMPENSATION, — FISCAL 2017,” in each case, in the Company’s proxy statement related to its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.



ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The information appearing under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” in the proxy statement related to the Company’s 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

There are no arrangements, known to the Company, which might at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

The following table sets forth, for the Company’s compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock subject to outstanding options, warrants, and rights, the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights, and the number of shares remaining available for future award grants as of May 27, 2017:30, 2020:

 

   Number of Securities to
Be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and
Rights

(a)
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))

(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

   7,163,975(1)  $15.08(2)   3,685,437(3) 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   —     —     —   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

   7,163,975  $15.08   3,685,437 



(1)This amount includes 7,163,975 shares of our common stock subject to stock options outstanding under our 2014 Performance Incentive Plan but does not include 189,015 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding pursuant to unvested restricted stock awards under our 2014 Performance Incentive Plan.
(2)This number reflects the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and has been calculated exclusive of outstanding restricted stock awards issued under our 2014 Performance Incentive Plan.
(3)Consists of 918,841 shares available for issuance under the Company’s ESPP and 2,766,596 shares available for issuance under the Company’s 2014 Performance Incentive Plan. Shares available under the 2014 Performance Incentive Plan generally may be used for any type of award authorized under that plan including stock options, restricted stock, stock bonuses, performance stock, stock units, phantom stock and other forms of awards granted or denominated in the Company’s common stock.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Securities

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remaining Available

 



 

Number of Securities

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

for Future Issuance

 



 

to Be Issued Upon

 

 

 

Exercise Price of

 

 

Under Equity

 



 

Exercise of

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

 

Compensation Plans

 



 

Outstanding Options,

 

 

 

Options,

 

 

(Excluding Securities

 



 

Warrants and Rights

 

 

 

Warrants and Rights

 

 

Reflected in Column (a))

 



 

(a)

 

 

 

(b)

 

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

5,755,018 

(1)

 

$

16.07 

(2)

 

3,093,776 

(3)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

-  

 

Total

 

5,755,018 

 

 

$

16.07 

 

 

3,093,776 

 



ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

(1)    This amount includes 5,755,018 shares of our common stock subject to stock options outstanding of 4,141,887 under our 2014 Performance Incentive Plan and 1,613,131 shares of our common stock under our 2004 Performance Incentive Plan but does not

64


include 89,907 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding pursuant to unvested restricted stock awards under our 2014 Performance Incentive Plan.

(2)    This number reflects the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and has been calculated exclusive of outstanding restricted stock awards issued under our 2014 Performance Incentive Plan.

(3)    Consists of 1,640,778 shares available for issuance under the Company’s ESPP and 1,452,998 shares available for issuance under the Company’s 2014 Performance Incentive Plan. Shares available under the 2014 Performance Incentive Plan generally may be used for any type of award authorized under that plan including stock options, restricted stock, stock bonuses, performance stock, stock units, phantom stock and other forms of awards granted or denominated in the Company’s common stock.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information appearing under the captions “BOARD OF DIRECTORS — DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE” and “BOARD OF DIRECTORS — POLICY“POLICY REGARDING TREATMENT OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS” in the proxy statement related to the Company’s 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.



ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The information appearing under the caption “PROPOSAL 2. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018”2021” in the proxy statement related to the Company’s 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended May 27, 2017,30, 2020, is incorporated herein by reference.

65


PART IV



ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

ITEM 15.EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)  1.  Financial Statements.

The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are included in Part II, Item 8 of this report:Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 27, 201730, 2020 and May 28, 201625, 2019

Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended May 27, 201730, 2020

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the three years in the period ended May 27, 2017

30, 2020

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years in the period ended May 27, 201730, 2020

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 27 201730, 2020

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2.  Financial Statement Schedules.

Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts are included in Notes 2 and 68 to the Registrant’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Schedules I, III, IV and V have been omitted as they are not applicable.

3.  Exhibits.

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index (following the signatures page of this report) are filed with, or incorporated by reference in, this report.

66

 

ITEM 16.

EXHIBIT INDEX

FORMEXHIBITS TO FORM 10-K SUMMARY.

Not applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report onForm 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

RESOURCES CONNECTION, INC.

By:Exhibit
Number

/S / HERBERT M. MUELLER

Herbert M. Mueller
Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 24, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report onForm 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

Title

Date

/S / KATE W. DUCHENE

Kate Duchene

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

July 24, 2017

/S / HERBERT M. MUELLER

Herbert M. Mueller

Chief Financial Officer and

Executive Vice President

(Principal Financial Officer)

July 24, 2017

/S / JOHN D. BOWER

John D. Bower

Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

July 24, 2017

/S / ANTHONY CHERBAK

Anthony Cherbak

Director and Executive AdvisorJuly 24, 2017

/S / SUSAN J. CRAWFORD

Susan J. Crawford

DirectorJuly 24, 2017

/S / NEIL DIMICK

Neil Dimick

DirectorJuly 24, 2017

/S / ROBERT KISTINGER

Robert Kistinger

DirectorJuly 24, 2017

/S / DONALD B. MURRAY

Donald B. Murray

Executive Chairman and DirectorJuly 24, 2017

/S / A. ROBERT PISANO

A. Robert Pisano

DirectorJuly 24, 2017

/S / ANNE SHIH

Anne Shih

DirectorJuly 24, 2017

/S / JOLENE SYKES SARKIS

Jolene Sykes Sarkis

DirectorJuly 24, 2017

/S / MICHAEL H. WARGOTZ

Michael H. Wargotz

DirectorJuly 24, 2017

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBITS TOFORM 10-K

Exhibit

Number

Description of Document

    3.1

    3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Resources Connection, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.210.21 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2004).

    3.2

    3.2

Third Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form8-K filing of August 31, 2015).

    4.1

    4.1

Stockholders Agreement, dated December 11, 2000, between Resources Connection, Inc. and certain stockholders of Resources Connection, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Amendment No. 7 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1 filed on December 12, 2000 (FileNo. 333-45000)).
    4.2

Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Amendment No. 7 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on FormS-1 filed on December 12, 2000(File (File No. 333-45000)).

    4.2*

Description of Resources Connection, Inc.’s Capital Stock

  10.1+

Resources Connection, Inc. Directors’ Compensation Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended February 26, 2011).

  10.2Consulting Agreement, effective August 29, 2016, between Nathan Franke and Resources Connection, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form8-K filed with 10-K for the SEC on August 17, 2016)fiscal year ended May 26, 2018).

  10.2

  10.3

Sublease Agreement, dated January 21, 2010, between O’Melveny & Myers LLP and Resources Connection Inc. DBA Resources Global Professionals (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended May 29, 2010).

  10.3+

  10.4+

Resources Connection, Inc. 20042014 Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filing of October 28, 2014).

  10.4+

Resources Connection, Inc. 2014 Performance Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions of Nonqualified Stock Option (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2018).

  10.5

Resources Connection, Inc. 2014 Performance Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Terms and Conditions (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2018).

  10.6+

Resources Connection, Inc. 2014 Performance Incentive Plan - Canada Terms and Conditions of Nonqualified Stock Option (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2018).

  10.7+

Resources Connection, Inc. 2014 Performance Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions of Nonqualified Stock Option (Netherlands) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2018).

  10.8+

Resources Connection, Inc. 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act on September 11, 2008)18, 2019).

  10.9+

  10.5+

Resources Connection, Inc. 2004 Performance Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2005).
  10.6+Resources Connection, Inc. 2004 Performance Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Netherlands) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2005).
  10.7+Resources Connection, Inc. 2014 Performance Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Form8-K filing of October 28, 2014).
  10.8+Resources Connection, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act on September 15, 2014).
  10.9+

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrant’s Form10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008).

67


  10.10+

Employment Agreement, dated October 20, 2016, by and between the Company and Anthony Cherbak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’ Form8-K filed with the SEC on October 24, 2016).
  10.11+Employment Agreement, effective August 29, 2016, between Herb Mueller and Resources Connection, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form8-K filed with the SEC on August 17, 2016).
  10.12+Employment Letter, effective August 29, 2016, between John Bower and Resources Connection, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form8-K filed with the SEC on August 17, 2016).

Exhibit

Number

Description of Document

  10.10

  10.13+

Separation and General Release Agreement, effective November 16, 2016, between Tracy Stephens and Resources Connection, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form8-K filed with the SEC on November 21, 2016).
  10.14+Employment Agreement, effective December 19, 2016, between Kate W. Duchene and Resources Connection, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2016).
  10.15

Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2016, by and among, Resources Connection, Inc., Resources Connection LLC, as borrowers, Resources Healthcare Solutions LLC, RGP Property LLC, and Sitrick Brincko Group LLC, as guarantors, and Bank of America, N.A., as lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form8-K filed with the SEC on October 17, 2016).

  10.11

  10.16

Security and Pledge Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2016, by and among Resources Connection, Inc., Resources Connection LLC, as borrowers, Resources Healthcare Solutions LLC, RGP Property LLC, and Sitrick Brincko Group LLC, as guarantors, and Bank of America, N.A., as lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.2 to the Registrant’s Form8-K filed with the SEC on October 17, 2016).

  10.12

  10.17

Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated November 27, 2016, between Bank of America N.A. and Resources Connection, Inc. and Resources Connection LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended November 26, 2016).

  10.13

  10.18

Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated February 21, 2017, between Bank of America N.A. and Resources Connection, Inc. and Resources Connection LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended February 25, 2017).

  10.14

Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement, dated August 25, 2017, between Bank of America N.A. and Resources Connection, Inc. and Resources Connection LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 26, 2017).

  10.15

Amendment No. 4 to Credit Agreement, dated May 28, 2018, between Bank of America N.A. and Resources Connection, Inc. and Resources Connection LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 26, 2018).

  10.16+

Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 25, 2017).

  10.17+  

Employment Agreement dated February 3, 2020 between Jennifer Ryu and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Resources Connection, Inc. on February 4, 2020).

  10.18+  

Employment Agreement dated February 3, 2020 between Kate W. Duchene and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by Resources Connection, Inc. on February 4, 2020).

  10.19+

Employment Agreement dated February 21, 2020 between Tim Brackney and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 22, 2020).

  10.20+

Retention Bonus Recovery Agreement dated February 21, 2020 between Tim Brackney and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 22, 2020).

  21.1*

List of Subsidiaries.

  23.1*

  23.1*

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

  31.1*

  31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

  31.2*

  31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

  32.1**

  32.1*

Rule 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

  32.2**

  32.2*

Rule 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

101.INS*

XBRL Instance.

101.INS*

101.SCH*

XBRL Instance.
101.SCH*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL*

101.CAL*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation.

101.DEF*

101.DEF*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition.

101.LAB*

101.LAB*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels.

101.PRE*

101.PRE*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation.



______________

*

*

Filed herewith.

+

**

Furnished herewith.

+

Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY.



84Not applicable.

68


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

RESOURCES  CONNECTION, INC.

By:

/  S / JENNIFER RYU

Jennifer Ryu

Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 27, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/ S / KATE W. DUCHENE

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

July 27, 2020

Kate W. Duchene

(Principal Executive Officer)

/ S / JENNIFER RYU

Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

July 27, 2020

Jennifer Ryu

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

/ S / ANTHONY CHERBAK

Director

July 27, 2020

Anthony Cherbak

/ S / SUSAN J. CRAWFORD

Director

July 27, 2020

Susan J. Crawford

/ S / NEIL DIMICK

Director

July 27, 2020

Neil Dimick

/ S / ROBERT KISTINGER

Director

July 27, 2020

Robert Kistinger

/ S / DONALD B. MURRAY

Executive Chairman and Director

July 27, 2020

Donald B. Murray

/ S / A. ROBERT PISANO

Director

July 27, 2020

A. Robert Pisano

/ S / ANNE SHIH

Director

July 27, 2020

Anne Shih

/ S / JOLENE SYKES SARKIS

Director

July 27, 2020

Jolene Sykes Sarkis

/ S / MARCO VON MALTZAN

Director

July 27, 2020

Marco von Maltzan

/ S / MICHAEL H. WARGOTZ

Director

July 27, 2020

Michael H. Wargotz

69