UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017March 28, 2020

or[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE PERIOD FROM             TO

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                  to                 Commission File Number 001-04714

Commission file number: 1-4714Skyline Champion Corporation

SKYLINE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana

 

Indiana

35-1038277

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization) Incorporation)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

755 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1000

Troy, Michigan

48084

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

P. O. Box 743, 2520 By-Pass Road

Elkhart, Indiana

46515

(Zip Code)(248) 614-8211

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:code)

(574) 294-6521

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b)12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Classeach class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchangeeach exchange on Which Registeredwhich registered

Common Stock $.0277 Par Value

NYSE American

SKY

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuantRegistered Pursuant to section 12 (g)Section 12(g) of the Act: None

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐   Yes [X ]  No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. ☐  Yes [ ]  No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrantRegistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☑   Yes [X]  No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☑   Yes [X]  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or an amendment to this Form 10-K.    ☑ [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,filers,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.Act:):

 

Large accelerated filer [X]

Accelerated filer [  ]

Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  ☐ [  ]

Smaller reporting company [   ]

Emerging growth company [  ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐   Yes [  ]  No [X]

TheAs of September 27, 2019, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.0277 per share, held by non-affiliates was $1,238,607,662 (computed by reference to the closing sales price of the registrant (6,899,780 shares) based on the closing price on the NYSE American on November 30, 2016 was $88,317,000.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes ofRegistrant’s common stock as of September 27, 2019). For this computation, the latest practicable date.Registrant has excluded the market value of all shares of common stock reported as beneficially owned by executive officers and directors of the Registrant; such exclusion shall not be deemed to constitute an admission that any such person is an affiliate of the Registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of May 13, 2020: 56,665,681

 

Title of Class

Shares Outstanding

August 11, 2017

Common Stock, $.0277 Par Value8,391,244


FORM 10-K

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement used in connection with its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on SeptemberJuly 29, 2017,2020 and which will be filed within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K in response to Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I

Item 1.

Business

2

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

6

10

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

8

18

Item 2.

Properties

8

18

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

9

19

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

9

19

Item 4.5.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

9

PART II

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

10

20

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

10

22

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

11

23

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

21

44

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

44

Item 9.

    Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

22

    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

23

    Consolidated Balance Sheets

25

    Consolidated Income Statements

27

    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

28

    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

29

    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

30
Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

42

44

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

42

44

Item 9B.

Other Information

43

45

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

44

46

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

44

46

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

44

46

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

45

47

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

45

47

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

48

(a)  1.  Financial Statements

46

48

       2. Financial Statement Schedules

46

48

       3. Index to Exhibits

46

SIGNATURES

Item 16.

10-K Summary

48

49



PART I

Cautionary Statement About Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) that are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations regarding our future liquidity, earnings, expenditures, and financial condition. These statements are often identified by the words “will,” “could”, “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “hope,” or similar expressions. These statements reflect management’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties. There are risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements, including regional, national and international economic, financial, public health and labor conditions, and the following:

 

The COVID-19 pandemic, which has had, and could continue to have, significant adverse effects on us;

Item 1.

Business.

the cyclicality and seasonality of the housing industry and its sensitivity to changes in general economic or other business conditions;

demand fluctuations in the housing industry;

supply-related issues;

labor-related issues;

the possible unavailability of additional capital when needed;

competition and competitive pressures;

changes in consumer preferences for our products or our failure to gauge those preferences;

quality problems, including the quality of parts sourced from suppliers and related liability and reputational issues;

data security breaches, cybersecurity attacks, and other information technology disruptions, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic;

the extensive regulation affecting the production and sale of factory-built housing and the effects of possible changes in laws with which we must comply;

the potential impact of natural disasters on sales and raw material costs;

the risks associated with possible mergers and acquisitions;

the prices and availability of materials;

periodic inventory adjustments by, and changes to relationships with, independent retailers;

changes in interest and foreign exchange rates;

insurance coverage and cost issues;

the possibility that all or part of our goodwill might become impaired;

the possibility that our risk management practices may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risks; and

other risks described in Part I — Item 1A, "Risk Factors," as well as the risks and information provided from time to time in our other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

General DevelopmentIf any of Businessthe risks or uncertainties referred to above materializes or if any of the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements proves to be incorrect, then differences may arise between our forward-looking statements and our actual results, and such differences may be material. Investors should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update, amend or clarify them to reflect events, new information or circumstances occurring after the date hereof, except as required by law.



ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

On June 1, 2018, Skyline Champion Corporation (formerly known as Skyline Corporation), an Indiana corporation, and Champion Enterprises Holdings, LLC (“Champion Holdings”) combined their operations pursuant to the Share Contribution & Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), dated as of January 5, 2018, by and between Skyline Corporation and Champion Holdings. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, Champion Holdings contributed to Skyline Corporation all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Champion Holdings’ wholly owned operating subsidiaries, Champion Home Builders, Inc. (“CHB”), and CHB International B.V. (“CIBV”) (the shares of stock of CHB and CIBV contributed to Skyline Corporation, the “Contributed Shares”), and in exchange for the Contributed Shares, Skyline Corporation issued to the members of Champion Holdings, in the aggregate, 47,752,008 shares of Skyline Corporation common stock, $0.0277 par value per share (such issuance, the “Shares Issuance”). The contribution of the Contributed Shares by Champion Holdings to the Corporation, and the Shares Issuance by Skyline Corporation to the members of Champion Holdings are collectively referred to herein as the “Exchange.”

The Exchange was treated as a purchase of the Company by Champion Holdings for accounting and financial reporting purposes. As a result, the financial results for all periods presented prior to the Exchange are comprised solely of the results of Champion Holdings.

The terms "Skyline Champion," "us," "we," "our," the "Company," and any other similar terms refer to Skyline Champion Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated in this Annual Report.

We are the largest independent publicly traded factory-built housing company in North America with net sales for the year ended March 28, 2020 (“fiscal 2020”) of $1.4 billion. We have more than 65 years of homebuilding experience, approximately 6,600 employees and 38 manufacturing facilities located in 18 states across the United States and three provinces in western Canada. We offer a leading portfolio of manufactured and modular homes, park model RVs, and modular buildings for the multi-family, hospitality, senior and workforce housing sectors. Our facilities are strategically located to serve strong markets in the United States and western Canada. We operated 13 manufacturing facilities in the top ten states with the highest number of manufactured homes shipped in fiscal 2020, as well as 16 manufacturing facilities in the ten states with the greatest growth in the number of manufactured homes shipped in the last ten years. We believe that we maintain the following leading positions in the factory-built housing industry in the United States and western Canada (based on units) in calendar year 2019:

Number two position in the manufactured housing market segment in the United States

Number one modular builder in the United States

A leading position in western Canada

A leading position in park model RV sales

We believe our market leading positions are driven by our comprehensive product offering, strong brand reputation, broad manufacturing footprint, and our complementary retail and logistics businesses. Our market share in the United States manufactured housing market segment has increased from 8% in the beginning of fiscal 2011 to approximately 17% in fiscal 2020 based on total number of units produced. We design and build a range of manufactured and modular homes, park model RVs, Accessory Dwelling Units (“ADUs”), and commercial structures. We believe that the high quality and broad scope of our product and service offerings provide us a competitive advantage relative to other factory-built and certain site-built homes. With our award-winning product designs, we seek to meet the needs of our localized customers, while also providing them with customizable options. Our leading brands are marketed and distributed through a network of independent and company-owned retailers, community operators, government agencies, and commercial developers.We build homes under some of the most well-known brand names in the factory-built housing industry including Skyline Homes, Champion Home Builders, Genesis Homes, Athens Park Models, Dutch Housing, Excel Homes, Homes of Merit, New Era, Redman Homes, Shore Park, Silvercrest, and Titan Homes in the U.S., and Moduline and SRI Homes in western Canada.

In addition to our core home building business, we operate a factory-direct manufactured-home retail business, Titan Factory Direct, with 21 sales centers spanning the southern United States, and Star Fleet Trucking, which provides transportation services to the manufactured housing and other industries from several dispatch locations across the United States.


Corporate Information

Skyline Champion Corporation was originally incorporated in Indiana as Skyline Corporation. Following the completion of the Exchange, we changed our name to Skyline Champion Corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 755 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1000, Troy, MI 48084. Our website is located at www.skylinechampion.com. Our website and the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference and is not a part of this Annual Report.

Business Strategies

We intend to continue to pursue opportunities to profitably grow our revenue, as well as improve our operating margins by executing on our strategic initiatives. However, we feel that the COVID-19 pandemic will slow this progress during fiscal 2021 and possibly fiscal 2022, depending on the trajectory of the virus and its impact on the broader U.S. and Canadian economies including consumer confidence, unemployment and other home-buying trends. Our long-term business strategy is to grow our revenue and earnings by constructing quality-built, sustainable, and innovatively designed homes and other modular structures in 1959, as successoran environmentally friendly factory setting.

Capitalize on Market Trends and Other Key Drivers

In recent years, manufactured home construction experienced revenue growth due to a number of favorable demographic trends and demand drivers in the United States, including the need for affordable housing, the underlying growth trends in key homebuyer groups, such as the population over 65 years of age, the population of first-time home buyers, and the population of households earning less than $50,000 per year. More recently, we see a number of market trends pointing to increased sales of ADUs and urban to rural migration as customers accommodate working from home patterns as well as people seeking rent-to-own single-family options. We intend to capitalize on these trends and drivers to grow our business foundedover the medium to long-term. We believe that there is an opportunity for continued manufactured and modular construction market with medium term expansion driven by the foregoing trends and demand drivers, as well as construction labor shortages in 1951. Skyline Corporationcertain regions (which tend to adversely and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Corporation”, “Skyline”) designs, producesdisproportionally impact supply and marketscost of site-built homes when compared to manufactured housing, modular housinghousing) and park modelsincreased affordability of factory-built homes relative to independent dealers andsite-built homes.

As the U.S. economy recovers to pre-COVID-19 levels, we will seek to capture additional demand from manufactured housing communities located throughoutthat increase spending on expansion and development projects. In addition, if financing availability continues to improve and related regulation continues to ease, we believe that there will be an increase in the United Statesnumber of prospective customers who qualify for home loans for manufactured and Canada.modular homes. Finally, we are one of a limited number of manufactured homebuilders who have been approved for contracts with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) and have historically provided housing assistance requirements following natural disasters and other housing emergencies.

Expand Products and Distribution Channels through Product Innovation

We design, produce, market, and transport a range of manufactured and modular homes, park model RVs, ADUs and commercial solutions through a variety of channels. We strive to grow our distribution through enhancing our digital offerings and our relationships with community operators, builder/developers, park model operators, and retailers. Through our newly launched Genesis brand, we are expanding our relationships with developers to meet pent-up demand for standardized homes that can be costed effectively and quickly constructed.

We plan to continue to innovate our home designs, home products, and commercial designs to meet the needs of existing and new customers. We have received numerous awards from the Manufactured Housing Institute (“MHI”), the National Association of Home Builders, and others for our leadership in manufactured and modular home designs, craftsmanship and quality. Most recently in calendar year 2020, MHI recognized us as an industry leader with three Excellence in Manufactured and Modular Home Design awards that spanned multiple categories including multi-section, single-section, and modular homes. These awards reflect the unparalleled homes, customer experiences and innovative solutions that we consistently bring to a competitive and dynamic market. We were awarded the Excellence in Home Design for Modular Homes over 4,000 Square Feet as well as recognized for our work on a hotel commercial project by the National Association for Home Builders. We maintain an active dialogue with residential and commercial developers to identify demand trends and anticipate the needs of customers. We also plan to continue to work closely with our suppliers to pilot new products and amenities, such as configurable smart living space ADU designs, in-home smart technologies and luxury interior finishes.


Continue to Implement Operational Initiatives to Enhance Margins Longer Term

We have been able to expand our operating margins over time as a result of increased volume, Exchange synergies, reduction of our material cost inputs, and company-wide efforts focused on standardization and simplification of our operations. We are currently focused on a number of ongoing operational initiatives to further enhance our long-term operating margins and construction innovation, including:

refining our product floor plan designs and options to offer “designed flexibility” to our customers;

improving our internal processes as well as externally facing systems to enhance the customer’s experience from initial introduction all the way through home ownership;

executing on continuous improvement initiatives related to identified procurement, operational and labor cost saving opportunities as well as streamlining overlapping functions;

enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of our products to the customer through value-adding material substitution; and

focusing on operational excellence and production efficiency through further simplification of our manufacturing process.

Among other initiatives, we plan to further develop our national product line under the Genesis brand, continue development of our modular platform, and standardize our engineering and design platform. We have a proven ability to distribute orders efficiently across our manufacturing footprint based on market demand, workforce availability, and our surrounding distribution capabilities. We are standardizing our manufacturing processes and employing metrics-driven accountability measures across all of our facilities to achieve these strategic initiatives.

Continue a Balanced Organic and Acquisition-Based Growth Strategy

We have demonstrated our ability to broaden our manufacturing and retail presence through the successful execution of a balanced organic growth and acquisition-based strategy. As demand for affordable housing is builtgrows and the global economy returns to standards established bypre-pandemic volumes, we will continue to execute on this growth strategy. We believe our idle manufacturing plants provide us with the ability to grow with demand over the longer term. We also intend to explore opportunities to acquire value enhancing retail locations, manufacturing facilities, and factory-built housing competitors to supplement our organic growth initiatives. We have a proven track-record of executing and integrating acquisitions.

Factory-Built Housing

A majority of our manufactured products are constructed in accordance with the regulations and rules of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development modular homes are built according to state, provincial or local building codes,(“HUD”) and park models are built according to specifications established by the American National Standards Institute.

The Corporation sold 3,679 manufactured homes, 313 modular homes and 447 park models in fiscal 2017.

The Corporation’s housing products are marketed under a number of trademarks. They are available in lengths ranging from 30’ to 76’ and in singlewide widths from 12’ to 18’, doublewide widths from 18’ to 32’, and triplewide widths from 36’ to 46’. The area of a singlewide ranges from approximately 400 to 1,200 square feet, a doublewide from approximately 700 to 2,400 square feet, and a triplewide from approximately 1,600 to 2,900 square feet.

As noted in “Discontinued Operations” in Item 7, the Corporation sold its recreational vehicle business during fiscal 2015 in order to focus on its core housing business. The Corporation’s park model business, which was formerly reported in the recreational vehicle segment, was not disposed as part of the sale and is now reported in the housing segment because net sales do not warrant separate segment reporting.

Financial Information about Segments

The Corporation operates in one business segment: housing. Prior to fiscal 2015, the Corporation reported net sales, operating results and total assets in two business segments; housing and recreational vehicles. During the second quarter of fiscal 2015, however, the Corporation made a strategic decision to exit the recreational vehicle industry in order to focus on its core housing business. In this regard, in October 2014 the Corporation sold substantially all of its recreational vehicle-related assets to Evergreen Recreational Vehicles, LLC. Operating results of the former recreational vehicle business are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented herein, and the recreational vehicle segment is no longer included in segment reporting (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Narrative Description of Business

Principal Products and Markets

The Corporation’s homes are marketed under a number of trademarks, and are available in a variety of dimensions. Manufactured housing models are built according to standards established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Modular homes are built according to state, provincial or local building codes. Each home typically includes two to four bedrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, one or two bathrooms, kitchen appliances, central heating and cooling. Custom options may include but are not limited to: exterior dormers and windows; interior or exterior accent columns; fireplaces and whirlpool tubs. Materials used to construct a manufactured or a modular home are similar to those used in site-built housing. The Corporation also sells homes that are “Energy-Star” compliant.

Park models are marketed under the “Shore Park” trademark. The Corporation’s park models are intended to provide temporary living accommodations for individuals seeking leisure travel and outdoor recreation.

The principal markets for manufactured and modular housing are the suburban and rural areas of the continental United States and Canada. The principal buyers continue to be individuals over the age of fifty, but the market tends to broaden when conventional housing becomes more difficult to purchase and finance.

Item 1.Business  —  (Continued).

Principal Products and Markets — (Continued)

The park model market is made up of primarily vacationing families and retired couples.

The Corporation provides the retail purchaser of its homes and park models with a full fifteen-month warranty against defects in design, materials and workmanship. The warranties are backed by service departments located at the Corporation’s manufacturing facilities and an extensive field service system.

The amount and percentage of net sales contributed by manufactured housing, modular housing and park model products is noted in Item 7.

Method of Distribution

The Corporation’s products are distributed by approximately 318 independent dealers at 653 locations throughout the United States and Canada. These are generally not exclusive dealerships and it is believed that most dealers also sell products of other manufacturers.

The Corporation’s products are sold to dealers either through floor plan financing with various financial institutions or on a cash basis. Payments to the Corporation are made either directly by the dealer or by financial institutions, which have agreed to finance dealer purchases of the Corporation’s products. In accordance with industry practice, certain financial institutions which finance dealer purchases require the Corporation to execute repurchase agreements in which the Corporation agrees, that in the event a dealer defaults on its repayment of the financing, the Corporation will repurchase its products from the financial institution in accordance with a declining repurchase price schedule agreed to by the financial institution and the Corporation. Any loss under these agreements is the difference between the repurchase cost and the resale value of the units repurchased. Further, the risk of loss is spread over numerous dealers.

The Corporation had no losses related to repurchases in fiscal year 2017, and losses of $50,000 related to repurchases of recreational vehicles in fiscal year 2016.

Additional information regarding these repurchase agreements is included in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8.

Raw Materials and Supplies

The Corporation is basically an assembler and installer of components purchased from outside sources. The major components used by the Corporation are electrical components, lumber, plywood, shingles, vinyl and wood siding, steel, aluminum, insulation, home appliances, furnaces, plumbing fixtures, hardware, floor coverings and furniture. The suppliers are many and range in size from large national companies to very small local companies. At the present time the Corporation is obtaining sufficient materials to fulfill its needs.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises and Concessions

The Corporation does not rely upon any terminable or nonrenewable rights such as patents, licenses or franchises under the trademarks or patents of others, in the conduct of its business.

Seasonal Fluctuations

While the Corporation maintains production of homes and park models throughout the year, seasonal fluctuations in sales do occur. Sales and production of homes are affected by winter weather conditions at the Corporation’s northern plants. Park model sales are generally higher in the spring and summer months than in the fall and winter months.

Inventory

The Corporation does not maintain significant finished goods inventories. In addition, there are no inventories sold on consignment.

Item 1.Business  —  (Continued).

Dependence Upon Individual Customers

During fiscal 2017, no individual customer had net sales exceeding 10 percent of total net sales. During fiscal 2016, net sales to Sun Home Services, Inc. (“Sun Home”) totaled $22,231,000 or 10 percent of total net sales. Based on past sales to Sun Home, the Corporation could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations if the Corporation experienced a loss of this customer or if the volume of sales significantly decreased.

Backlog

The Corporation does not consider the existence and extent of backlog to be significant in its business. The Corporation’s production is based on a relatively short manufacturing cycle and customer orders, which continuously fluctuate.

As such, the existence of backlog is insignificant at any given date and does not typically provide a reliable indication of the status of the Corporation’s business.

Government Contracts

The Corporation has had no government contracts during the past three years.

Competitive Conditions

The Corporation’s primary competitors range from multi-billion dollar corporations to relatively small and specialized manufacturers. The principal methods of competition include but are not limited to price, features, service, warranty and product performance. Service and product performance are believed to be competitive advantages, while lack of vertical integration is considered a competitive disadvantage. The Corporation also competes with companies that provide other forms of housing, such as new and existing site-built homes, apartments, condominiums and townhouses.

The following tables show the Corporation’s competitive position on a calendar and fiscal year basis in the product lines it sells.

   Units Shipped
Calendar Year 2016
  Units Shipped
Calendar Year 2015
 
   Industry   Skyline   Market
Share
  Industry   Skyline   Market
Share
 

Manufactured housing

   81,169    3,606    4.4  70,519    2,872    4.1

Modular housing

   13,881    334    2.4  13,974    341    2.4

Park models

   3,669    419    11.4  3,649    380    10.4

   Units Shipped
Fiscal Year 2017
  Units Shipped
Fiscal Year 2016
 
   Industry   Skyline   Market
Share
  Industry   Skyline   Market
Share
 

Manufactured housing

   86,999    3,679    4.2  75,857    3,217    4.2

Park models

   3,886    447    11.5  3,479    337    9.7

The competitive position for modular housing on a fiscal year basis is omitted because industry data is only available on a calendar quarter basis.

The Corporation’s business is affected by the availability of wholesale and retail financing. Consequently, increases in interest rates and the availability of credit through governmental action or otherwise, have adversely affected the Corporation’s business in the past and may do so again in the future.

Environmental Quality

The Corporation believes that compliance with federal, state and local requirements with respect to environmental quality will not require any material capital expenditures for plant or equipment modifications which would adversely affect earnings.

Item 1.Business — (Continued).

Government Regulations

The manufacture, distribution and sale of manufactured housing, modular housing and park models are subject to government regulations in the United States at federal, state and local levels. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has set national manufactured home construction and safety standards and implemented recall and other regulations since 1976. The National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974, as amended ("HUD code"). We produce a broad range of manufactured and modular homes under a variety of brand names and in a variety of floor plans and price ranges. While most of the homes we build are single-family, multi-section, ranch-style homes, we also build two-story, single-section, and Cape Cod style homes as well as multi-family units such as town homes, apartments, duplexes, and triplexes. The single-family homes that we manufacture generally range in size from 400 to 4,000 square feet and typically include two to four bedrooms, a living room or family room, a dining room, a kitchen and typically two full bathrooms. We also build park model RVs for resorts and campgrounds, ADUs for backyard or recreational living, and commercial modular structures, including hotels, and student and workforce housing.

We regularly introduce homes with new floor plans, exterior designs and elevations, decors and features. Our corporate marketing and engineering departments work with our manufacturing facilities to design homes that appeal to consumers’ changing tastes at appropriate price points for their respective markets. We design and build homes with a traditional residential or site-built appearance through the use of, among other features, dormers and higher pitched roofs. In fiscal 2020, we introduced our Genesis brand of homes which have features similar to site-built home amenities such as porches and garages, and are eligible for recently launched financing programs with terms similar to traditional mortgages. We also are very active in the design and construction of energy-efficient homes. Many of our U.S. manufacturing facilities are certified to produce “Energy Star®” rated homes through a special EPA program for manufactured housing.  

The components and products used in factory-built housing are generally of the same quality as those used by other home builders, including conventional site-builders. The primary components include lumber, plywood, OSB, drywall, steel, floor coverings, insulation, exterior siding (vinyl, composites, wood and metal), doors, windows, shingles, kitchen appliances, furnaces, plumbing and electrical fixtures and hardware. These components are presently available from a variety of sources and we are not dependent upon any single supplier. Prices of certain materials such as lumber, insulation, steel and drywall can fluctuate significantly due to changes in demand and supply. Additionally, availability of certain materials such as drywall and insulation have sometimes


been limited, resulting in higher prices and/or the need to find alternative suppliers. Typically, a one to three-week supply of raw materials is maintained. We generally have been able to pass higher material costs on to customers in the form of surcharges and price increases.

Most completed factory-built homes have cabinets, wall coverings and electrical, heating and plumbing systems. HUD code homes also generally contain factory installed floor coverings, appliances and window treatments. Optional factory installed features include fireplaces, dormers, entertainment centers and skylights. Upon completion of the home at the factory, homes sold to retailers are transported to a retail sales center or directly to the home site. Homes sold to builders and developers are generally transported directly to the home site. At the home site, the home is placed on a foundation or otherwise affixed to the property and readied for occupancy typically by setup contractors. The sections (also referred to as floors) of a multi-section home are joined and the interior and exterior seams are finished at the home site. The consumer purchase of the home may also include retailer or contractor supplied items such as additional appliances, air conditioning, furniture, porches, decks, and garages.

We construct homes in indoor facilities using an assembly-line process employing approximately 100 to 200 production employees at each facility. Factory-built HUD code homes are constructed in one or more sections affixed to a steel support frame that allows the sections to be moved through the assembly line and transported upon sale. The sections of many of the modular homes we produce are built on wooden floor systems and transported on carriers that are removed upon placement of the home at the home site. Each section or floor is assembled in stages, beginning with the construction of the frame and the floor, then adding the walls, ceiling and roof assembly, and other constructed and purchased components, and ending with a final quality control inspection. The efficiency of the assembly-line process, protection from the weather, and favorable pricing of materials resulting from our substantial purchasing power enables us to produce homes more quickly and often at a lower cost than a conventional site-built home of similar quality.

The production schedules of our homebuilding facilities are based upon customer orders, which can fluctuate from week to week. Orders from retailers are generally subject to cancellation at any time up to the commencement of production without penalty and are not necessarily an indication of future business. Retailers place orders for retail stocking (inventory) purposes and for homebuyer orders. Before scheduling homes for production, orders and availability of financing are confirmed with our customer and, where applicable, their lender. Orders are generally filled within 90 days of receipt, depending upon the level of unfilled orders and requested delivery dates. Because we produce homes to fulfill wholesale orders, our factories generally do not carry finished goods inventories, except for homes awaiting delivery. We manage our production levels, capacity and workforce size based upon current market demands. At March 28, 2020, we had a backlog of home orders with wholesale sales value of approximately $127.5 million. After production of a particular home has commenced, the order becomes noncancelable and the retailer is obligated to take delivery of the home.

Although factory-built homes can be produced throughout the year in indoor facilities, demand for homes is usually affected by inclement weather and by the cold winter months in northern areas of the U.S. and in Canada. Charges to transport homes increase with the distance from the factory to the retailer or home site. As a result, most of the retailers and builders/developers we sell to are located within a 500-mile radius of our manufacturing plants.

We offer a wide selection of manufactured and modular homes as well as park model RVs at company-owned retail locations marketed under the Titan Factory Direct brand. We maintain our company-owned retail presence through 21 retail sales centers in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia. We have benefited from the strategic expansion of our captive distribution to enhance the reach of our factory-built housing products directly to the homebuyer.

Each of our full-service retail sales centers has a sales office and a variety of display model homes of various sizes, floor plans, features, and prices that are displayed in a residential setting with sidewalks and landscaping. Customers may purchase a home from an inventory of homes maintained at the location, including a model home, or may order a home that will be built at a manufacturing facility. The collective benefits of our retail organization provide industry leadership with the expertise to be proactive to local economic conditions and ultimately provide affordable homes to value-conscious homebuyers.

During fiscal 2020, the average selling price was $61,000 for our U.S. factory-built homes and $84,000 for our homes sold through our Canadian housing segment. Manufactured home sales prices ranged from $20,000 to over $250,000. Retail sales prices of the homes, without land, generally ranged from $25,000 to over $300,000, depending upon size, floor plan, features, and options.


Logistics

We operate a logistics business, Star Fleet Trucking, specializing in the transportation of manufactured homes and recreational vehicles from manufacturing facilities to retailers. Star Fleet’s delivery logistics are coordinated through dispatch terminals located in Idaho, Indiana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Star Fleet has strong relationships with its customer base, which includes some of the largest manufactured housing companies (including our own factory-built housing operations), and recreational vehicle manufacturers in the U.S.

Market Overview

General. Factory-built housing provides an affordable alternative to other types of housing such as site-built housing and condominiums, and to existing housing such as pre-owned homes and apartments. According to statistics published by the Institute for Building Technology and Safety ("IBTS") and the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, for the 2019 calendar year, manufactured housing wholesale shipments of homes constructed in accordance with the HUD code accounted for an estimated 10.7% of all new single-family homes starts.

According to data reported by MHI, industry home shipments were 97,553; 93,265 and 90,729 units (excluding FEMA units) during fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Industry shipments of HUD-code FEMA units were 112 and 4,315 in fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. There were no industry shipments of HUD-coded FEMA units in fiscal 2020 or 2019. Annual shipments have generally increased each year since calendar year 2009 when only 50,000 HUD-coded manufactured homes were shipped, the lowest level since the industry began recording statistics in 1959. While shipments of HUD-coded manufactured homes have improved modestly in recent years, manufactured housing’s most recent annual shipment levels still operate at lower levels than the long-term historical average of over 200,000 units annually.

The market for factory-built housing is affected by a number of factors, including the availability, cost and credit underwriting standards of consumer financing, consumer confidence, employment levels, general housing market, interest rates and other economic conditions and the overall affordability of factory-built housing versus other forms of housing. In the past, a number of factors have restricted demand for factory-built housing, including, in some cases, less-favorable financing terms compared to site-built housing, the effects of restrictive zoning on the availability of certain locations for home placement and, in some cases, an unfavorable public image. Certain of these adverse factors have lessened considerably in recent years with the improved quality and appearance of factory-built housing.

Home Buyer Demographics. We believe the segment of the housing market in which manufactured housing is most competitive includes consumers with household incomes under $60,000. This segment has a high representation of young single persons and married couples, first time home buyers, and homebuyers age 55 and older. The comparatively low cost of manufactured homes attracts these consumers. People in rural areas, where fewer housing alternatives exist, and those who presently live in factory-built homes, also make up a significant portion of the demand for new factory-built housing. We believe higher-priced, multi-section manufactured and modular homes are attractive to households with higher incomes as an alternative to rental housing and condominiums and are well suited to meet the needs of the retiree buyer in many markets.

The two largest manufactured housing consumer demographics, Millennials (generally defined as those born between 1981 – 1996) and Baby Boomers (generally defined as those born between 1946 – 1964), comprise the fastest growing populations. Millennials are generally first-time home buyers who may be attracted by the affordability, and diversity of style choices of factory-built homes. Baby Boomers are similarly interested in the value proposition; however, they are also motivated by the energy efficiency and low maintenance requirements of factory-built homes, and by the lifestyle offered by planned communities that are specifically designed for homeowners that fall into this age group.


Financing

Commercial Financing. Independent retailers of factory-built homes generally finance their inventory purchases from manufacturers with floor plan financing provided by third-party lending institutions and secured by a lien on the homes. The availability and cost of floor plan financing can affect the amount of retailer new home inventory, the number of retail sales centers and related wholesale demand.Under a typical floor plan financing arrangement, an independent financial institution specializing in this line of business provides the retailer with a loan for the purchase price of the home and maintains a security interest in the home as collateral. The financial institution customarily requires us, as the manufacturer of the home, to enter into a separate repurchase agreement with the financial institution that, upon default by the retailer and under certain other circumstances, obligates us to repurchase the financed home at declining prices over the term of the repurchase agreement (which, in most cases, is 18 to 36 months). The price at which we may be obligated to repurchase a home under these agreements is based upon the amount financed, plus certain administrative and shipping expenses. Our obligation under these repurchase agreements ceases upon the purchase of the home by the retail customer. The maximum amount of our contingent obligations under such repurchase agreements was approximately $152.7 million as of March 28, 2020. The risk of loss under these agreements is spread over many retailers and is further reduced by the resale value of the homes. During fiscal 2020, approximately 32% of our sales to independent retailers were financed under floor plan agreements with national lenders, while the remaining 68% were financed under various arrangements with local or regional banks or paid in cash. We generally receive payment from the lending institution 5 to 10 days after a home is sold and invoiced to an independent retailer.

Consumer Financing. Sales of factory-built homes are significantly affected by the availability, credit underwriting standards, and regulationscost of consumer financing. There are promulgated, prohibits statesthree basic types of consumer financing in the factory-built housing industry: 1) conforming mortgage loans which comply with the requirements of the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Agriculture or Government-Sponsored Enterprise (“GSE”) loans which include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac agencies; 2) non-conforming mortgages for purchasers of the home and the land on which the home is placed; and 3) personal property loans (often referred to as home-only or chattel loans) for consumers where the home is the sole collateral for the loan (generally HUD-coded homes).

Industry trade associations are working towards favorable legislative and GSE action to address the mortgage financing needs of potential buyers of affordable homes. Many moderate-income families cannot afford to buy a home due to the increasing costs of newly constructed homes and decreasing supply of existing, affordable homes. Federal law required the GSEs to issue a regulation to implement the Duty to Serve (“DTS”) requirements specified in the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. FNMA and FHLMC released their final Underserved Markets Plan that describes, with specificity, the actions they will take over a three-year period to fulfill the DTS obligation. These plans became effective on January 1, 2018. The GSEs have obtained feedback from establishingvarious stakeholders during their outreach efforts on advancing the underserved markets since the DTS plans became effective in 2018. Their DTS plans continue to evolve based on the feedback received and their current areas of focus are as follows: 1) purchase more loans used to finance manufactured homes titled as real property; 2)enhance current products and create new offerings; and 3) provide consumer education to help borrowers navigate both the real property and personal property markets. The GSEs have rolled out new financing programs specifically for homes built to the HUD code, which include CHOICEHome® from Freddie Mac and MH Advantage® from Fannie Mae. HUD-coded homes manufactured for these programs have features comparable to site-built homes, including, drywall throughout, higher-pitch roof line, energy-efficient features, lower profile foundation, plus additional options such as a garage or continuing in effect anycarport. These products aim to promote quality manufactured homes as an acceptable alternative to site-built homes and will allow moderate-income families to purchase a manufactured home standard that is not identicalwith lending terms similar to those for site-built homes.

The DTS plans also explored the potential for the GSEs to provide liquidity to the federal standardschattel lending market, first through a limited pilot and then through an ongoing program. The GSEs could potentially serve as additional source of funding as there is unmet demand in the chattel loan industry, and GSE involvement could increase volume substantially. Freddie Mac has made the decision to any covered aspect of performance. Implementation of these standardssuspend activities on pursuing a pilot on manufactured homes titled as personal property and regulations involves inspection agency approvalinstead allocate resources on pursuing activities including loan purchases of manufactured home designs, plant and home inspection by states or other HUD-approved third parties, manufacturer certificationhomes titled as real property. The Fannie Mae DTS plan still includes a provision indicating that the standards are met, and possible recalls if they are notexploring a pilot to establish a secondary market for chattel or if homes contain safety hazards.home-only loans.Expansion of the secondary market for home-only lending through the GSEs could provide further demand for housing, as lending options would likely become more available to home buyers. Separate from the GSE involvement in chattel markets, there have been three secondary market chattel private placement offerings in the last twelve months. Although some limited progress has been made in this area, a meaningful positive impact in the form of increased home orders has yet to be realized.


Competition

HUD has promulgated rules requiringThe factory-built housing industry is highly competitive at both the manufacturing and retail levels, with competition based upon several factors, including price, product features, reputation for service and quality, depth of distribution, and retail customer financing. Capital requirements for entry into the industry are relatively low.

According to MHI, in March 2020, there were 33 producers of manufactured homes to utilize wood products certified by their suppliers to meet HUD’s established limits on formaldehyde emissions, and to place in each home written notice to prospective purchasers of possible adverse reaction from airborne formaldehyde in the homes. These rules are designated as preemptiveU.S. operating an estimated 136 production facilities. For calendar year 2019, the top 3 companies had a combined market share of state regulation. Some componentsHUD code homes of approximately 76%, according to data published by MHI. We estimate that there were approximately 4,000 industry retail locations throughout the U.S. during calendar year 2019.

Based on industry data reported by IBTS, in fiscal 2020 our U.S. wholesale market share of HUD code homes sold was 16.5%, compared to 16.6% in fiscal 2019. We compete with the 32 other producers of manufactured homes, as well as companies offering for sale homes repossessed from wholesalers or consumers. In addition, manufactured homes compete with new and modularexisting site-built homes, as well as apartments, townhouses, and condominiums.

There are a number of other national manufacturers competing for a significant share of the manufactured housing market in the U.S., including Clayton Homes, Inc. and Cavco Industries. Certain of these competitors may also be subject to Consumer Product Safety Commission standardspossess greater financial, manufacturing, distribution, and recall requirements.marketing resources.

Regarding park models, the Corporation has voluntarily subjected itself to third party inspection in order to further assure the Corporation, its dealers, and customers of compliance with established standards.Government Regulation

Manufactured housing, modular housing and park model sales may be subject to the Magnuson–Moss Warranty – Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, which regulates warranties on consumer products.

The Corporation’s operationsOur manufactured homes are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws, codes and regulations. The majority of our homes are built to comply with the HUD code which include regulations that cover all aspects of manufactured home construction and installation, including structural integrity, fire safety, wind loads, thermal protection and ventilation. To the extent state and local regulations conflict with the HUD code, they are pre-empted. Our modular homes and commercial structures are built to comply with applicable state and local building codes. Our park model RVs are built in conformance with the applicable standards approved by the American National Standards Institute, a private, non-profit organization that administers and coordinates voluntary standards and conformity programs.

A variety of laws affect the financing of the homes we manufacture. The Federal Occupational Safety and HealthConsumer Credit Protection Act and are routinely inspected thereunder.

The transportation and placement (inRegulation Z promulgated thereunder require written disclosure of information relating to such financing, including the case of manufactured and modular housing)amount of the Corporation’s productsannual percentage interest rate and the finance charge. A variety of state laws also regulate the form of financing documents and the allowable deposits, finance charge and fees charged. Federal laws permit manufactured housing retailers to assist home buyers with securing financing for the purchase of homes; however, they are subject to state highway useprohibited from negotiating the financing terms.

Governmental authorities enforcing these numerous laws and regulations and local ordinances which control the size of unitscan impose fines and/or seek injunctive relief for violations. We believe that may be transported, the roads to be used, speed limits, hours of travel, and allowable locations for manufactured homes and communities.

The Corporation is also subject to many state manufacturer licensing and bonding requirements, and to dealer dayour operations are in court requirements in some states.

The Corporation believes that it is currently insubstantial compliance with the aboverequirements of these applicable laws and regulations.

Number of EmployeesSeasonality

The Corporation employed approximately 1,300 people at May 31, 2017.housing industry is subject to seasonal fluctuations based on home buyer purchasing patterns. We typically experience decreased home buyer traffic during holidays and popular vacation periods. Demand for our core single-family new home products typically peaks each spring and summer before declining in the winter, consistent with the overall housing industry, although this pattern was partially interrupted during the winter of fiscal 2018, when we produced a limited number of disaster-relief homes for FEMA.

Executive OfficersThe U.S. has experienced extreme weather events over the past few years resulting in widespread property damage. It has been widely reported that the overall economic toll in the affected market areas that have experienced severe weather events is substantial. There has been somewhat increased consumer demand for replacement of homes lost as a result of these events. This may include demand for additional disaster-relief manufactured home orders from federal and state agencies. We have produced disaster-relief homes for FEMA previously. These homes were built in factories located in unaffected regions of the Corporationcountry, primarily during the winter months, which lessened disruptions to existing order demand from our core customer base.


Employees

Information regardingWe have approximately 6,600 employees. We deem our relationship with our employees to be generally good. Currently, our manufacturing facilities in Canada employ approximately 700 workers, and most of the Corporation’s executive officersworkers belong to trade associations that operate under collective bargaining agreements. There are five collective bargaining agreements (one for each Canadian plant) and each have separate expiration dates. One agreement expired in November 2019 and is locatedstill under renegotiation, two agreements are set to expire in this document under Item 4.5.June 2020, one agreement is set to expire in November 2021, and one agreement is set to expire in November 2022.

Available Information

The Corporation makesOur website address is www.skylinechampion.com and we make available, free of charge, on or through the Investors sectionour website all of its internet website its annualour periodic reports, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reportsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material is electronically filed or furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Corporation’s internet site is http://www.skylinecorp.com. A copy of the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K will be provided without charge upon written request to Skyline Corporation, Investor Relations Department, Post Office Box 743, Elkhart, Indiana 46515.

The public may read and copy any materials the Corporation has filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may also obtain information on the

Item 1.Business — (Continued).

Available Information — (Continued)

operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Item 1A.Risk Factors.

Investors or potential investorsOur business involves a number of risks and uncertainties. You should carefully consider the following risks, together with the information provided elsewhere in this Annual Report. The items described below.below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks of which the Corporation is presently unawarethat are currently unknown to us or that the Corporation considerswe currently consider to be immaterial may also impair our business or adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and is expected to continue to have, significant adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and business.

The global outbreak of COVID-19 has caused a material adverse effect on the level of economic activity around the world, including in all of the markets that we serve. In response to this outbreak, the governments of many countries, states, cities and regions have taken preventative or protective actions, such as imposing restrictions on travel and business operations. We have implemented numerous measures attempting to manage and mitigate the effects of the virus on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and business, but there can be no assurance that these measures will succeed. We cannot predict the degree to which, or the time period over which, our sales and operations will be affected by this outbreak and the preventative measures. The effects could be highly material.

The COVID-19 pandemic poses many risks, including that we or our employees, suppliers, customers and others may be restricted or prevented from conducting business activities for indefinite or intermittent periods of time, including as a result of employee health and safety concerns, shutdowns, shelter-in-place or stay-at-home orders, travel restrictions, and other actions and restrictions that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities. Beginning in March 2020, we experienced the temporary shutdown of several of our facilities in the U.S. and Canada. Certain government orders related to COVID-19 mitigation efforts may further restrict our ability to operate our business and may impact our financial condition and results of operations. Finally, while certain facilities are considered essential and can remain in operation during the COVID-19 pandemic, there can be no assurance that these facilities will continue to be classified as essential in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate and will remain in operation. In addition, many of our facilities that remain in operation are not utilized as fully as they were before the COVID-19 pandemic. Underutilization of facilities could increase if and as the pandemic persists and spreads further.

Further, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, disruptions or delays in our supply chain as a result of such actions. This is likely to result in higher supply chain costs to us, incurred in order to maintain the supply of component parts needed to produce our products.

Our management of the impacts of COVID-19 has required, and will continue to require, significant investment of time by our management and employees. The focus on managing and mitigating the impacts of COVID-19 on our business may cause us to divert or delay the application of our resources toward other or new initiatives or investments, which in turn may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We may also experience impacts from market downturns and changes in consumer behavior including uncertainty in consumer confidence, increasing unemployment, and reductions in discretionary spending related to pandemic fears as a result of COVID-19. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic include widespread unemployment and uncertainty, among other problems, reducing the likelihood of people seeking new or improved housing.

Further, the impacts of COVID-19 have caused significant uncertainty and volatility in the credit markets. We rely on the credit markets to provide us with liquidity to operate and grow our businesses beyond the liquidity that operating cash flows provide. If our access to capital were to become significantly constrained, or if costs of capital were to increase significantly due to the impact of COVID-19, then our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and business, could be materially adversely affected.


The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak continues to impact us will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new government actions or restrictions, new information that may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19, the longevity of COVID-19 and the impact of COVID-19 on economic activity. The COVID-19 pandemic also may have the effect of significantly heightening other risks associated with our business and our financial condition, including several of the risks disclosed below.

The factory-built housing industry is cyclical, is affected by seasonality and is sensitive to changes in general economic or other business conditions.

The factory-built housing industry is affected by seasonality. Sales during the period from March to November are typically higher than in other months. As a result, our sales and operating results sometimes fluctuate and may continue to fluctuate in the future.

The factory-built housing industry is also sensitive to changes in economic conditions and other factors, such as pandemics, employment rates, job growth, population growth, consumer confidence, consumer income, availability of financing, interest rate levels, and an oversupply of homes for sale. Changes in any of these conditions generally, or in the markets where we operate, could reduce demand and constrain pricing for new factory-built homes in these areas or result in customer cancellations of pending shipments. Reductions in the number of homes shipped by us or constraints on the prices we can charge, could result in a decrease in our net sales and earnings, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

We are subject to demand fluctuations in the housing industry. Reductions in demand could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and hinder financial performance.condition.

IncurrenceDemand for our homes is subject to fluctuations in the housing market generally. In a housing market downturn, our sales and results of Net Losses

Due to negative economic conditions that impacted the manufactured housing, modular housingoperations could be adversely affected; there might be significant inventory impairments and recreational vehicle industries, the Corporation incurred netother write-offs; our gross margins could decline significantly from historical levels; and we might incur losses from fiscaloperations. We cannot predict the future demand for housing. If it were to decline significantly, our financial condition could be adversely affected.

Future increases in interest rates, more stringent credit standards, tightening of financing terms, or other increases in the effective costs of owning a factory-built home (including those related to regulation or other government actions) could limit the purchasing power of our potential customers and could adversely affect our business and financial results.

A large majority of our customers finance their home purchases through third-party lenders. Interest rates have been near historical lows for several years, 2008 to 2015. Losseswhich has made purchasing new factory-built homes more affordable. Increases in future yearsinterest rates or decreases in the availability of consumer financing could negativelyadversely affect the Corporation’s liquidity.

Changing Consumer Preferences

Changes in consumer preferencesmarket for manufactured housing, modular housinghomes. Potential customers may be less willing or able to pay the increased monthly costs or to obtain financing. Lenders may increase the qualifications needed for financing or adjust their terms to address any increased credit risk. These factors could adversely affect the sales or pricing of our factory-built homes. These developments have historically had, and park models occur over time, and consequently the Corporation responds to changing demand by evaluating the market acceptability of its products. Delays in responding to changing consumer preferences couldmay once again have, an adverse effect on net sales, operating results and cash flows.

Dependence on Independent Dealers

The Corporation sells its manufactured homes, modular homes and park models to independent dealers. These dealers are not obligated to exclusively sell the Corporation’s products, and may choose to sell competitor’s products. In addition, a dealer may become financially insolvent and be forced to close its business. Both scenarios could have an adverse effect on net sales, operating results and cash flows.

Cost and Availability of Raw Materials

Prices and availability of raw materials used to manufacture the Corporation’s products can change significantly due to fluctuations in supply and demand. In addition, the cost of raw materials is also influenced by transportation costs. The Corporation has historically been able to have an adequate supply of raw materials by maintaining good relations with its vendors. Increased prices have historically been passed on to dealers by raising the price of manufactured housing, modularoverall demand for factory-built housing and park models. There is no certainty that the Corporation will be able to pass on future price increases and maintain an adequate supply of raw materials. The inability to raise the price of its products and to maintain a proper supply of materials could have a negative impact on net sales, operating results and cash flows.

Dealer Inventories

As wholesale shipments of manufactured homes, modular homes and park models exceed retail sales, dealer inventories reach a level where dealers decrease orders from manufacturers. As manufacturers respond to reduced demand, many either offer discounts to maintain production volumes or curtail production levels. Both outcomes could have a negative impact on net sales, operating results and cash flows.

Competition

As noted in Item 1, the manufactured housing, modular housing and park model industries are highly competitive with particular emphasis on price and features offered. Some of the Corporation’s competitors are vertically integrated by owning retail, consumer finance and insurance operations. This integration may provide competitors with an advantage with dealers. In addition, the Corporation’s housing products competecompetitiveness with other forms of housing, such asand could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The liquidity provided by the GSEs and the FHA is also critical in insuring or purchasing home mortgages and creating or insuring investment securities that are either sold to investors or held in their portfolios. Any limitations or restrictions on the availability of financing by these agencies could adversely affect interest rates, financing, and our sales of new and existing site-built homes, apartments, condominiums and townhouses. The inability to effectively compete in this environment could result in lower net sales, operating results and cash flows.homes.

Item 1A.Risk Factors. — (Continued).

Retail Financing Availability

Customers who purchase the Corporation’s products generally obtain retail financing from third party lenders. The availability terms and cost of retailwholesale financing depend on the lending practices of financial institutions, governmental policies and economic and other conditions, all of which are beyond the Corporation’s control. A customer seeking to purchase a manufactured home without land will generally pay a higher interest rate and have a shorter loan maturity versus a customer financing the purchase of land and a home. This differencefor retailers is limited due to most states classifying home-only manufactureda limited number of floor plan lenders and reduced lending limits.

Factory-built housing loans as personal property rather than real property for purposes of taxation and lien perfection.

In past years, many lenders of home-only financing have tightened credit underwriting standards, with some deciding to exit the industry. These actions resulted in decreased availability of retail financing, causing a negative effect on sales and operating results. If retail financing were to be further curtailed, net sales, operating results and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Wholesale Financing Availability

Independent dealers of the Corporation’s productsretailers generally finance their inventory purchases with wholesale floor plan financing provided by lending institutions. A dealer’s ability to obtainThe availability of wholesale financing is significantly affected by the number of lending institutions offering floor planning,plan lenders and by an institution’stheir lending limits. In past years,Limited availability of floor plan lending negatively affects the industries in which the Corporation operates experienced a reduction in bothinventory levels of our independent retailers, the number of lenders offering floor planningretail sales center locations and related wholesale demand, and adversely affects the amountavailability of money available for financing. Any further decline inand access to capital on an ongoing basis. As a result, if the availability of wholesale financing is reduced, we could haveexperience sales declines or a negative impact on a dealer’s ability to purchase manufactured housing, modular housinghigher level of customer defaults and park model products, resulting in lower net sales, operating results and cash flows.

Governmental Regulations

As noted in Item 1, the Corporation is subject to various governmental regulations. Implementation of new regulations or amendments to existing regulations could significantly increase the cost of the Corporation’s products. In addition, failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in fines or potential civil or criminal liability. Both scenarios could negatively impact net sales, operating results and cash flows.

Contingent Repurchase Agreements

As referenced in Note 10 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8, the Corporation is contingently liable under repurchase agreements with certain financial institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of its products. The Corporation could be required to fulfill some or all of the repurchase agreements, resulting in increased expense and reduced cash flows.

Cyclical and Seasonal Nature of Business

The industries in which the Corporation operates are highly cyclical, and are impacted by but not limited to the following conditions:

Availability of wholesale and retail financing;

Consumer confidence;

Interest rates;

Demographic and employment trends;

Availability of used or repossessed homes or park model; and

Impact of inflation.

Sales associated with the manufactured housing, modular housing and park model industries are also seasonal in nature with sales being lowest in the winter months. Seasonal changes, in addition to weakness in demand in one or both of the Corporation’s market segments, could materially impact the Corporation’s net sales, operating results and cash flows.

Item 1A.Risk Factors. — (Continued).

Dependence on Executive Officers and Other Key Personnel

The Corporation depends on the efforts of its executive officers and certain key employees. An unexpected loss of the service of one or more of these individuals could have an adverse effect on net sales, operating results and cash flows could suffer.

We have contingent repurchase obligations related to wholesale financing provided to industry retailers.

As is customary in the factory-built housing industry, a significant portion of our manufacturing sales to independent retailers are financed under floor plan agreements with financing companies. In connection with the floor plan financing programs, we generally have separate agreements with the financing companies that require us to repurchase homes upon default by the retailer and


repossession of the Corporation.homes by the financing companies. The impact of COVID-19 may have an adverse impact on the solvency of independent industry retailers, and as a result, we may be required to honor the contingent repurchase agreements if the retailers default under terms of the floor plan financing arrangements. These repurchase agreements are applicable for various periods of time, generally up to 24 months after the sale of the home to the retailer. However, certain homes are subject to repurchase until the home is sold by the retailer. Our contingent repurchase obligation as of March 28, 2020, was estimated to be approximately $152.7 million, without reduction for the resale value of the homes. We may be required to honor contingent repurchase obligations in the future and may incur additional expense and reduced cash flows because of these repurchase agreements.

Covenant ComplianceIf we are unable to establish or maintain relationships with independent distributors that sell our homes, our sales could decline and our results of operations and cash flows could suffer.

Although we maintain our own factory direct retail business in select markets, we conduct a majority of our business through independent distributors. Over 90% of our shipments of homes in fiscal 2020 were made to independent distributors throughout the United States and western Canada. We may not be able to establish relationships with new independent distributors or maintain good relationships with independent distributors that sell our homes. Even if we establish and maintain relationships with independent distributors, these customers are not obligated to sell our homes exclusively and may choose to sell competitors’ homes instead. The independent distributors with whom we have relationships can cancel these relationships on short notice. In addition, these customers may not remain financially solvent, as they are subject to industry, economic, demographic, and seasonal trends similar to those faced by us. If we do not establish and maintain relationships with solvent independent distributors in the markets we serve, sales in those markets could decline, and if we cannot effect offsetting expansion of our factory-direct retail business, our results of operations and cash flows could suffer.

Prices of certain materials can fluctuate and availability of certain materials may be limited at times, adversely affecting our business.

Prices of certain materials used in the construction of homes, such as lumber, insulation, steel, drywall, oil-based products and fuel, can fluctuate significantly due to changes in demand and supply, adversely affecting our business. Additionally, availability of certain materials such as drywall and insulation may be limited at times, resulting in higher prices or the need to find alternative suppliers. We may attempt to pass the higher material costs on to customers, but it is not certain that we will be able to achieve this without adversely affecting demand. Limited availability of materials may also adversely affect our production capabilities and results of operations.

For some of the components used in production, we depend on a small group of suppliers, the loss of any of which could adversely affect our ability to obtain components in a timely manner or at competitive prices, which would in turn decrease our sales and profit margins. Some components are sourced from foreign sources. Delays in obtaining these components or the imposition of new or additional tariffs could result in increased costs and decreased sales and profit margins.

We depend on timely and sufficient delivery of components from our suppliers. Most components are readily available from a variety of sources. However, a few key components are currently produced by only a small group of quality suppliers that have the capacity to supply large quantities. Some of these components are foreign-sourced. Their supply is subject to disruption by government actions and global events, including the COVID-19 pandemic. If we cannot obtain an adequate supply of these key components our sales could decline and our results of operations and cash flows could suffer.

Our results of operations can be adversely affected by labor shortages and turnover.

The Corporation’s securedhomebuilding industry has from time to time experienced labor shortages and other labor-related issues. A number of factors may adversely affect the labor force available to us and our subcontractors in one or more of our markets, including high employment levels, construction market conditions, and government regulation, which include laws and regulations related to workers’ health and safety, wage and hour practices, and immigration. Our direct labor has historically experienced high turnover rates, which can lead to increased spending on training and retention and, as a result, increased costs of production. An overall labor shortage or a lack of skilled labor could cause significant increases in costs or delays in construction of homes, which could have a material adverse effects on our net sales and results of operations.

Industry conditions and future operating results could limit our sources of capital. If we are unable to locate suitable sources of capital when needed, we may be unable to maintain or expand our business.

We depend on our cash balances, cash flows from operations, and our revolving credit facility necessitates compliance(the “Credit Facility”) to finance our operating requirements, capital expenditures, and other needs. If our cash balances, cash flows from operations, and availability


under the Credit Facility are insufficient to finance our operations and alternative capital is not available, then we may not be able to expand our business and make acquisitions, or we may need to curtail or limit our existing operations.

Factory-built housing operates in the highly competitive housing industry, and, if other home builders are more successful or offer better value to our customers, then our business could decline.

We operate in a very competitive environment and faces competition from a number of other home builders in each market in which we operate. We compete with various financial covenants. Duringlarge national and regional home building companies and with smaller local home builders for financing, raw materials, and skilled management and labor resources. Some of our manufacturing competitors have captive retail distribution systems and consumer finance and insurance operations. In addition, there are independent factory-built housing retail locations that sell competitors’ products in most areas where our homes are sold and in most areas where we have retail operations. Because barriers to entry to the secondindustry at both the manufacturing and third quartersretail levels are low, we believe that it is relatively easy for new competitors to enter our markets. In addition, our products compete within the housing industry more broadly with other forms of fiscal 2017,low to moderate-cost housing, including site-built homes, panelized homes, apartments, townhouses, condominiums, and repossessed homes. We also compete with resale homes, also referred to as “previously owned” or “existing” homes, as well as rental housing.

An oversupply of homes available for sale or the Corporation did not meet certain financial covenants. Waiverheavy discounting of home prices by our competitors could adversely affect demand for our homes and the results of our operations. An increase in competitive conditions could have any of the covenant defaults were obtained. Thefollowing impacts on us: sale of fewer homes or higher cancellations by our home buyers; an increase in selling incentives or reduction of prices; and realization of lower gross margins due to lower selling prices or an inability to meet covenantsincrease selling prices to offset increased costs of the homes delivered. If we are unable to compete effectively in our markets, then our business could decline disproportionately to that of our competitors. As a result, our sales could decline and our results of operations and cash flows could suffer.

Changes in consumer preferences for our products or our failure to gauge those preferences could lead to reducedsales.

We cannot be certain that historical consumer preferences for factory-built homes in general, and for our products in particular, will remain unchanged. Our ability to remain competitive depends heavily on our ability to provide a continuing and timely introduction of innovative product offerings. We believe that the introduction of new features, designs, and models will be critical to the future success of our operations. Managing frequent product introductions poses inherent risks. Delays in the future represents an eventintroduction or market acceptance of default, which if not curednew models, designs, or waivedproduct features could negatively affect the Corporation’s ability to obtain financing under the facility and thereby have an adverse effect on liquidity.

Information Technology

The Corporation utilizes information technology and other computer resources (“computer systems”) to perform various operational tasks, and record and maintain business data. These computer systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from power outages, telecommunications or internet failures, computer viruses, computer breaches, catastrophic events or human error. If computer systems and corresponding backup systems are damaged or fail to function property, the Corporation could have disruptions in production and operational delays that could have an adverse effect on sales, operating results and cash flows.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.

None

Item 2.Properties.

The Corporation’s eight operating manufacturing facilities and three corporate facilities, all of which are owned, are as follows:

Location

Products

Approximate
Square Footage

California, San Jacinto

Housing and Park Models84,000

California, Woodland

Housing and Park Models81,000

Florida, Ocala

Housing and Park Models139,000

Indiana, Elkhart

Corporate37,000

Indiana, Elkhart

Corporate18,000

Indiana, Elkhart

Corporate4,000

Kansas, Arkansas City

Housing and Park Models83,000

Ohio, Sugarcreek

Housing and Park Models149,000

Oregon, McMinnville

Housing and Park Models246,000

Pennsylvania, Leola

Housing and Park Models210,000

Wisconsin, Lancaster

Housing and Park Models130,000

The Corporation also owns undeveloped land in McMinnville, Oregon. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, a manufactured housing plant located in Mansfield, Texas was sold for a gain of $1,502,000.

The total unit productive capacity of the Corporation is not readily ascertainable due to the ever-changing product mix. The Corporation believes that its plant facilities, machinery and equipment are well maintained and are in good operating condition.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

The Corporation is a party to various pending legal proceedings in the normal course of business. Management believes that any losses resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations or financial position.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 4.5Executive Officers of the Registrant.

Pursuant to General Instruction G.(3) of Form 10-K, the following information is included as an unnumbered item in this Part I in lieu of being included in the Corporation’s Proxy Statementour business. Products may not be accepted for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

The executive officers of the Corporation are as follows:

Name

Age

Position

Richard W. Florea

54President and Chief Executive Officer

Jeffrey A. Newport

52Chief Operating Officer

Jon S. Pilarski

54Vice President, Finance & Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer

Terrence M. Decio

65Vice President, Marketing and Sales

Robert C. Davis

52Vice President, Manufacturing

Martin R. Fransted

65Corporate Controller and Secretary

Richard W. Florea, President and Chief Executive Officer, was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer of Skyline effective July 27, 2015. Prior to joining Skyline Mr. Florea served as President and Chief Operating Officer for Truck Accessories Group, LLC, a producer of fiberglass caps and tonneaus for light and mid-sized trucks. From 1998 through 2009, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc., a maker of travel trailers. Mr. Florea was a division sales manager for Skyline from 1994 to 1998.

Jeffrey A. Newport,Chief Operating Officer, joined the Corporation in February 2016. During the previous four years, he served as President of Goldshield Fiberglass, a manufacturer of fiberglass components located in Decatur, Indiana.

Jon S. Pilarski,Vice President, Finance & Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, joined the Corporation in 1994. He served as Corporate Controller from 1997 to 2007 and was elected Vice President in 2007.

Terrence M. Decio, Vice President, Marketing and Sales, joined the Corporation in 1973. He was elected Vice President in 1985, Senior Vice President in 1991, Senior Executive Vice President in 1993 and Vice President-Marketing and Sales in 2004.

Robert C. Davis,Vice President, Manufacturing, joined the Corporation in 1999. He worked in Corporation Operations from 2009 to 2010, served as Corporate Operations Manager and Senior Operations Manager from 2010 to 2012, and Director of Operations from 2012 to 2013. He was elected Vice President in 2013.

Martin R. Fransted,Corporate Controller and Secretary, joined the Corporation in 1981 and was elected Corporate Controller and Secretary in 2007.

PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Skyline Corporation (SKY) is traded on the NYSE American (formerly known as the NYSE MKT LLC). At May 31, 2017, there were 531 shareholders of record of Skyline Corporation common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the Corporation’s common stock for each full quarterly period within the fiscal years ended May 31, 2017 and 2016.

   Common Stock Price Range 
   2017   2016 
   High   Low   High   Low 

First quarter

  $12.29   $7.92   $3.43   $2.90 

Second quarter

  $13.89   $10.34   $3.82   $2.17 

Third quarter

  $17.31   $10.19   $5.00   $2.52 

Fourth quarter

  $13.03   $5.07   $11.86   $4.04 

Skyline has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock over the past two fiscal years. Skyline presently intends to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation of the business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information as of May 31, 2017, with respect to the Corporation’s Stock Incentive Plan under which our equity securities were authorized for issuance to directors, officers, employees and eligible independent contractors in exchange for consideration in the form of goods or services.

   Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants,
and Rights (a)
   Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and
Rights
   Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance Under
Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding
Securities Reflected
in Column (a))
 

Plan Category

      

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders

   274,000   $4.79    411,000 

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders

            
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   274,000   $4.79    411,000 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Additional information regarding the Stock Incentive Plan is in Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The name, address and phone number of the Corporation’s stock transfer agent and registrar is:

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

P. O. Box 5050000

Louisville, KY 40233

(312) 588-4237

Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

Not applicable.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations.

Overview

The Corporation designs, produces and markets manufactured housing, modular housing and park models to independent dealers, developers, campgrounds and manufactured housing communities located throughout the United States and Canada. To better serve the needs of its dealers, developers, campgrounds and communities, the Corporation has multiple facilities in several states. Manufactured housing, modular housing and park models are sold to customers either through floor plan financing with various financial institutions, credit terms, or on a cash basis. While the Corporation maintains production of manufactured housing, modular homes and park models throughout the year, seasonal fluctuations in sales do occur.

Manufactured Housing, Modular Housing and Park Model Industry Conditions

Sales and production of manufactured housing, modular housing and park models are affected by winter weather conditions at the Corporation’s northern plants. Manufactured and modular housing are marketed under a number of trademarks,reasons, including changes in consumer preferences or our failure to properly gauge consumer preferences. Further, we cannot be certain that new product introductions will not reduce net sales from existing models and are available in a varietyadversely affect our results of dimensions. Parkoperations. In addition, our net sales may be adversely affected if our new models are marketed under the “Shore Park” trademark.

Manufactured housingand products are built accordingnot introduced to standards established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Modular homesmarket on time or are built accordingnot successful when introduced. Finally, our competitors’ products may obtain better market acceptance despite our efforts to state, provincial or local building codes. Park models are built according to specifications established bylead the American National Standards Institute, and are intended to provide temporary living accommodations for individuals seeking leisure travel and outdoor recreation.market.

Sales of manufactured housing, modular housing and park models are affected byWhen we introduce new products into the strength of the U.S. economy, interest rate and employment levels, consumer confidence and the availability of wholesale and retail financing. Recent trends regarding calendar year unit shipments of the Corporation’s products and their respective industries are as follows:

Manufactured Housing

  2012   2013  2014  2015  2016 

Industry

   54,891    60,210   64,344   70,519   81,169 

Percentage Increase

     9.7  6.9  9.6  15.1

Corporation

   1,848    2,205   2,678   2,872   3,606 

Percentage Increase

     19.3  21.5  7.2  25.6

Modular Housing

                 

*Industry

   13,290    14,020   13,844   13,974   13,881 

Percentage Increase (Decrease)

     5.5  (1.3%)   0.9  (0.7%) 

**Corporation

   382    350   477   341   334 

Percentage Increase (Decrease)

     (8.4%)   36.3  (28.5%)   (2.1%) 

Park Models

                 

Industry

   2,780    3,598   3,781   3,649   3,669 

Percentage Increase (Decrease)

     29.4  5.1  (3.5%)   0.5

Corporation

   138    171   307   380   419 

Percentage Increase

     23.9  79.5  23.8  10.3

*Domestic shipment only. Canadian industry shipments not available.
**Includes domestic and Canadian unit shipments

Fiscal 2017 Resultsmarketplace, we may incur expenses that we did not anticipate, which, in turn, can result in reduced earnings.

The Corporation experienced the following results during fiscal 2017:

Net sales were $236,504,000, an approximate 11.7 percent increase from the $211,774,000 reported in the same period a year ago.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Fiscal 2017 Results  (Continued)

Income from continuing operations was $5,000 as comparedintroduction of new models, floor plans, and features are critical to income of $1,873,000 for the same period a year ago.

No incomeour future success, but we may incur unexpected expenses when we make such introductions. For example, we may experience unexpected engineering or loss from discontinued operations as compared to a loss, net of income taxes, of $195,000 for the same period a year ago.

Net income for fiscal 2017 was $5,000 as compared to $1,678,000 for fiscal 2016. On a basic per share basis, net income was $.00 as compared to $.20 for the comparable period a year ago.

Net sales attributable to Elkhart and Mansfield were $22,956,000 as compared to Mansfield’s net sales of $12,588,000 in the same period a year ago.

Net losses attributable to Elkhart and Mansfield before corporate allocation and net gain on sale of property, plant and equipment were $4,594,000 as compared to $2,538,000 in the comparable period a year ago.

Discontinued Operations

During September 2014, the Corporation made a strategic decision to exit the recreational vehicle industry in order to focus on its core housing business. As a result, on October 7, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of certain assets associated with its recreational vehicle segment to Evergreen Recreational Vehicles, LLC.

The following table summarizes the results of discontinued operations:

   Year Ended 
   May 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Net Sales

  $   $71 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating loss of discontinued operations

      $(195
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

       (195

Income tax expense

        
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  $   $(195
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Elkhart, Indiana and Mansfield, Texas Facilities

In the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2017, the Corporation entered into a restructuring plan involving the suspension of operations at facilities in Elkhart, Indiana and Mansfield, Texas. Production ceased at both facilities in the fourth quarter. There were neither one-time termination agreements nor material costs related to the termination of contracts such as leases related to the restructuring. Inventory and fixed asset sale and disposal losses related to the restructuring totaled $170,000 and $222,000, respectively. No liability related to the restructuring was recorded as of May 31, 2017. The Corporation anticipatesdesign flaws that a portion of customers previously served by these plants will be serviced by its facilities in Arkansas City, Kansas and Sugarcreek, Ohio. Mansfield’s real property and equipment was sold in the fourth quarter as noted in “Net Gain on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment.”

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Elkhart, Indiana and Mansfield, Texas Facilities — (Continued)

Net sales and net losses incurred by these facilities, excluding corporate overhead allocations and the net gain on the sale of property, plant and equipment were as follows:

   Fiscal 2017 
   

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

 
    1st
Quarter
   2nd
Quarter
   3rd
Quarter
   4th
Quarter
   Year 

Net Sales

  $5,201   $8,092   $7,573   $2,090   $22,956 

Cost of Sales

  $5,881   $8,966   $8,087   $2,985   $25,919 

Selling and administrative expenses

  $475   $488   $431   $237   $1,631 

Net (Loss)

  $(1,155  $(1,362  $(945  $(1,132  $(4,594
   Fiscal 2016 
   

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)

 
    1st
Quarter
   2nd
Quarter
   3rd
Quarter
   4th
Quarter
   Year 

Net Sales

  $3,106   $3,802   $2,305   $3,375   $12,588 

Cost of Sales

  $3,455   $3,863   $2,694   $3,823   $13,835 

Selling and administrative expenses

  $381   $405   $217   $288   $1,291 

Net (Loss)

  $(730  $(466  $(606  $(736  $(2,538

Although the Corporation expects cost reductions as a result of these closings, the amounts of the reported losses are not necessarily predictive of the amounts of the cost savings because sales and production of at least a portion of these homes will potentially occur at other existing facilities as discussed above.

Secured Revolving Credit Facility

On March 20, 2015, the Corporation (“Borrower(s)”) entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with First Business Capital Corp. Under the Loan Agreement, First Business Capital will provide a secured revolving credit facility to the Borrowers for a term of three years, renewable on an annual basis thereafter with each renewal for a successive one-year term. The Corporation may obtain loan advances up to a maximum of $10,000,000 subject to certain collateral-obligation ratios. In addition, loan advances bear interest at 3.75% in excess ofThe Wall Street Journal’s published one-year LIBOR rate, and are secured by substantially all of the Borrowers’ assets, now owned or hereafter acquired. Interest is payable monthly, in arrears, and all principal and accrued but unpaid interest is due and payable upon termination of the Loan Agreement. First Business Capital also agreed under the Loan Agreement to issue, or cause to be issued by a bank affiliate or other bank, letters of credit for the account of the Corporation. However, no advances have yet been made in connection with such letters of credit.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Corporation on two occasions did not meet a covenant requiring a monthly loss not exceeding $500,000. Consequently, the Corporation received in the second quarter a waiver of the defaults that occurred. In addition, the following modifications were made to the Loan Agreement.

A covenant specifying that a monthly loss not exceed $500,000 was modified to $1,500,000 for December 2015, $1,000,000 for January 2016, and $1,000,000 for February, 2016. Following February 2016, the maximum monthly net loss as noted in the original Loan Agreement returns to $500,000 for March to May 2016, and $250,000 thereafter;

The limit for the lease, purchase or acquisition of any asset increased from $600,000 per year to $800,000 per year; and

The monthly bank assessment fee increased from .25% per annum to .35% per annum.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Secured Revolving Credit Facility — (Continued)

In June 2016, additional amendments were made to the Loan Agreement:

An increase in the capital expenditure limit for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 from $800,000 in the aggregate to $1,250,000 in the aggregate;

An increase in the capital expenditure limit for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2017 from $800,000 in the aggregate to $1,500,000 in the aggregate. In the absence of any subsequent amendment, the capital expenditure limit for subsequent fiscal years shall remain at $800,000 in the aggregate per fiscal year; and

A covenant specifying that a monthly net loss in fiscal 2017 not exceed $250,000 was increased to $500,000 for June 2016, $1,000,000 for July 2016, and $1,000,000 for December 2016. Such increases were effective only for the months identified. In the absence of any subsequent amendment, the maximum monthly net loss for all other months of fiscal year 2017 and thereafter remain at $250,000.

In November 2016 the Corporation did not meet a covenant requiring a monthly loss not to exceed $250,000. Subsequent to November 30, 2016, the Corporation received a waiver for the default that occurred in the second quarter. In addition, the Loan Agreement was modified to eliminate the monthly maximum Net Loss covenant effective with the fiscal month ended December 31, 2016.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Corporation did not meet a covenant requiring the year to date net loss not to exceed $1,750,000, and a covenant requiring net worth as of February 28, 2017 to not be below $23,383,000. Subsequent to February 28, 2017, the Corporation received a waiver for the default that occurred in the third quarter and paid to First Business Capital an accommodation fee of $50,000. The Corporation was in compliance with loan agreement covenants as of May 31, 2017.

On July 21, 2017, the Corporation terminated the Loan Agreement in connection with its entry into a new Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. having terms more favorable to the Corporation. As of the date of termination, the Corporation did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Loan Agreement. In addition, the Corporation did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the Loan Agreement. Information regarding the Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is noted in “Subsequent Events.”

Subsequent Events

On July 21, 2017, the Corporation (the “Loan Parties,” and Skyline Corporation and Skyline Homes, Inc., the “Borrowers” and each a “Borrower”) entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and other ancillary agreements and documents, including a Security Agreement and Patent and Trademark Security Agreement (collectively referred to along with the Agreement as the “Loan Documents”). Under the Agreement, Chase will provide a three-year revolving credit facility with loan advances to the Borrowers of up to a maximum of $10,000,000, subject to a borrowing base set forth in the Agreement (the “New Facility”). Loan advances bear interest at either 50 basis points above Chase’s floating prime rate (“CBFR”) or 150 basis points in excess of the LIBOR rate for the applicable period (the “Adjusted LIBO Rate”). Loans are secured by the Loan Parties’ assets, now owned or hereafter acquired, except for real property and any life insurance policies owned by any Borrower on the effective date of the Agreement. Interest is payable in arrears on a monthly basis in the case of the CBFR or at the end of the applicable interest rate in the case of the Adjusted LIBO Rate, and all principal and accrued but unpaid interest is due and payable at the maturity of the New Facility. Borrowers may at any time prepay in whole or in part any loan amounts, subject to minimum amounts and breakage costs.

Also under the Agreement, Chase agreed to issue letters of credit for the account of the Borrowers not to exceed $500,000. No advances have yet been made in connection with such letters of credit.

As part of the closing of the financing, the Company paid Chase a closing fee of $25,000 plus legal and due diligencewarranty costs. The Loan Parties also agreed to pay the following fees to Chase during the term of the New

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Subsequent Events — (Continued)

Facility: (i) a commitment fee payable in arrears at a rate of .25% per annum on the average daily amount of the available revolving commitment under the New Facility during the prior calendar month; and (ii) monthly letter of credit fees payable in arrears at the applicable Adjusted LIBO Rate on the outstanding amount of letters of credit issued and outstanding during the prior month.

The Loan Documents contain covenants that limit the ability of the Loan Parties to, among other things: (i) incur other indebtedness; (ii) create or incur liens on their assets; (iii) consummate asset sales, acquisitions, or mergers; (iv) pay dividends; (v) make certain investments; (vi) enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and (vii) amend a Loan Party’s articles of incorporation or bylaws.

The Agreement also requires compliance with a financial covenant involving a fixed charge coverage ratio as set forth in the Agreement.

If the Borrowers default in their obligations under the Agreement, then the unpaid balances will bear interest at 2.0% per annum in excess of the rate that would apply in the absence of a default. Other remedies available to Chase upon an event of default include the right to accelerate the maturity of all obligations, the right to foreclose on and otherwise repossess the collateral securing the obligations, and all other rights set forth in the Loan Documents.

The events of default under the Agreement include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency; (ii) failure to make required payments; (iii) misrepresentations to Chase; (iv) failure to comply with certain covenants and agreements; (v) changes in control; and (vi) a material adverse change occurs.

Results of Operations — Fiscal 2017 Compared to Fiscal 2016

Net Sales and Unit Shipments

   2017   Percent   2016   Percent   Increase
(Decrease)
 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Net Sales

          

Manufactured Housing

  $196,322    83.0   $174,523    82.4   $21,799 

Modular Housing

   22,243    9.4    24,372    11.5    (2,129

Park Models

   17,939    7.6    12,879    6.1    5,060 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Net Sales

  $236,504    100.0   $211,774    100.0   $24,730 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unit Shipments

          

Manufactured Housing

   3,679    82.9    3,217    82.2    462 

Modular Housing

   313    7.0    360    9.2    (47

Park Models

   447    10.1    337    8.6    110 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Unit Shipments

   4,439    100.0    3,914    100.0    525 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net sales increased approximately 11.7 percent. The increase was comprised of a 12.5 percent increase in manufactured housing net sales, an 8.7 percent decrease in modular housing net sales, and a 39.3 percent increase in park model net sales. Current year net manufactured housing sales includes approximately $10,969,000 attributable to the Elkhart, Indiana facility which commenced operations in June 2016. Modular net sales declined primarily due to decreased demand from Midwest-based dealers as manufactured housing products are able to satisfy demand from retail customers.Park model net sales rose as a result of Management’s initiative to increase this product’s exposure at substantially all of the Corporation’s facilities.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Net Sales and Unit Shipments — (Continued).

For fiscal 2017, the percentage increase or decrease in unit shipments from the comparable period last year are as follows:

   Skyline  Industry

Manufactured Housing

   14.4 14.7%

Modular Housing

   (13.1%)  Not Available

Park Models

   32.6 11.7%

Total

   13.4 Not Available

Compared to the prior year, the average net sales price for manufactured housing decreased 1.6 percent primarily as a result of homes sold with less square footage and fewer amenities; partially offset by a price increase. The average sales price for modular housing and park models both increased 5.0 percent as a result of a price increase and product sold with greater square footage and additional amenities.

Cost of Sales

   2017   Percent of
Net Sales
   2016   Percent of
Net Sales
   Increase 
   (Dollars in Thousands) 

Cost of Sales

  $214,527    90.7   $188,461    89.0   $26,066 

Cost of sales, in dollars, increased primarily as a result of increased net sales. Current year cost of sales includes approximately $12,420,000 attributable to the Elkhart, Indiana facility. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales increased primarily due to higher manufacturing labor costs associated with hiring and training employees at facilities which are increasing production output.

Selling and Administrative Expenses

   2017   Percent of
Net Sales
   2016   Percent of
Net Sales
   Increase 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Selling and administrative expenses

  $ 22,908    9.7   $21,120    10.0   $1,788 

Selling and administrative expenses increased primarily as a result of $632,000 in costs associated with the Elkhart, Indiana facility and an increase in administrative salaries and wages. In addition, the Corporation benefited in prior year from a $250,000 final payment received in the second quarter on an account that had been previously reserved. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses declined due to certain costs remaining relatively constant amid rising sales.

Net Gain on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, the Corporation sold real property and substantially all of the equipment at its former facility located in Mansfield, Texas. The net sales price was $2,212,000, resulting in a gain of $1,502,000. The assets sold were security under the Corporation’s Secured Revolving Credit Facility with First Business Capital. First Business Capital released its lien on the real property subject to $1,100,000 of the net sales proceeds being held in a cash collateral account at First Business Bank, an affiliate of First Business Capital. The gain was offset by $222,000 in losses associated with the disposal of Mansfield equipment not sold, and the sale or disposal of equipment used by the Corporation’s former facility in Elkhart, Indiana.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Interest Expense

   2017   2016   Increase
(Decrease)
 
   (Unaudited) 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Interest on life insurance policies loans

  $223   $223   $ 

Amortization on debt financing costs

   103    82    21 

Interest on secured revolving credit facility

   18    15    3 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $344   $320   $24 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense primarily increased as the result of debt financing costs incurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 that are being amortized over the remaining term of the Secured Revolving Credit Facility.

Financial Summary by Quarter

   Financial Summary by Quarter 

2017

  1st
Quarter
   2nd
Quarter
   3rd
Quarter
   4th
Quarter
   Year 
   (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net sales

  $61,176   $64,226   $51,640   $59,462   $236,504 

Gross profit

   6,580    5,230    3,219    6,948    21,977 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   744    (595   (2,447   2,303    5 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

                    

Net income (loss)

   744    (595   (2,447   2,303    5 

Basic income (loss) per share

   .09    (.07   (.29   .27    .00 

2016

  1st
Quarter
   2nd
Quarter
   3rd
Quarter
   4th
Quarter
   Year 
   (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net sales

  $48,742   $58,684   $47,697   $56,651   $211,774 

Gross profit

   4,643    7,227    4,810    6,633    23,313 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   (895   1,748    (514   1,534    1,873 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

   61    (42   (6   (208   (195

Net income (loss)

   (834   1,706    (520   1,326    1,678 

Basic income (loss) per share

   (.10   .20    (.06   .16    .20 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

   May 31,   Increase 
   2017   2016   (Decrease) 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Cash

  $11,384   $7,659   $3,725 

Current assets, exclusive of cash

  $25,918   $28,159   $(2,241

Current liabilities

  $18,385   $18,031   $354 

Working capital

  $18,917   $17,787   $1,130 

As noted in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended May 31, 2017, cash increased due to cash provided by operating activities of $2,868,000 and cash provided by investing activities of $857,000. Current assets, exclusive of cash, decreased primarily due to a $2,402,000 decreased in Accounts receivable and a $923,000 decrease in Workers’ compensation security deposit; offset by an $852,000 increase in Inventories.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Liquidity and Capital Resources — (Continued)

Accounts receivable decreased due to the timing of payments from customers at May 31, 2017 as compared to May 31, 2016. Workers’ compensation security deposit decreased to fund workers’ compensation claims for the current fiscal year. Raw material inventories increased due to anticipated production scheduled to occur in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Work in process inventories increased due to increased production at May 31, 2017 as compared to May 31, 2016.

Current liabilities increased primarily as a result of a $359,000 increase in Customer deposits as the Corporation received deposits from a greater number of customers at May 31, 2017 as compared to May 31, 2016.

Capital expenditures totaled $1,355,000 for fiscal 2017 as compared to $1,132,000 for fiscal 2016. The increase is the result of building improvements, purchasing equipment for the Elkhart, Indiana facility, and replacing equipment that had reached its full economic useful life.

The Corporation was in compliance as of May 31, 2017 with loan agreement covenants associated with the Secured Revolving Credit Facility with First Business Capital Corp.

If necessary, the Corporation has the ability to borrow approximately $2,300,000 under the cash surrender value of certain life insurance policies. Management believes sufficient liquidity exists to meet financial obligation that will occur for at least one year after the date of the filing of this annual report.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Corporation to make certain estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. Estimates are periodically evaluated using historical experience and various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following accounting policies are considered to requiretypes of problems could be substantial and could have a significant estimate:

Deferred Tax Assets

Net deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed basedadverse effect on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates.

The Corporation has a valuation allowance against substantially all of its deferred tax assets. In addition, net deferred tax assets consist of federal net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, state net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences between financial and tax reporting. Additional information regarding the decrease in the valuation allowance is referenced in Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

Substantially all of the Corporation’s products are made to order. Revenue is recognized upon completion of the following: an order for a unit is received from a dealer or community (customer); written or verbal approval for payment is received from a customer’s financial institution or payment is received; a common carrier signs documentation accepting responsibility for the unit as agent for the customer; and the unit is removed from the Corporation’s premises for delivery to a customer. Freight billed to customers is considered sales revenue, and the related freight costs are cost of sales. Volume based rebates paid to dealers are classified as a reduction of sales revenue. Sales of parts are classified as revenue.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Product Warranties

As referenced in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, homes and park models are sold with a fifteen-month warranty.our earnings. Estimated warranty costs are accrued at the time of product sale basedto reflect our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products. An increase in actual warranty claims costs as compared to our estimates could result in increased warranty reserves and expense, which could have adverse impacts on our earnings.  

Our products and services may experience quality problems from time to time that can result in decreased sales and gross margin and can harm our reputation.

Our products contain thousands of parts, many of which are supplied by a network of approved vendors. Product defects may occur, including components purchased from material vendors. There is no assurance that all such defects will be detected prior to the distribution of our products. In addition, although we endeavor to compel suppliers to maintain appropriate levels of insurance coverage, there is no assurance that if a defect in a vendor-supplied part were to occur that the vendor would have the financial ability to rectify the defect. Failure to detect defects in our products, including vendor-supplied parts, could result in lost revenue, increased warranty and related costs, and could harm our reputation.


If the factory-built housing industry is not able to secure favorable local zoning ordinances, our sales could decline and our results of operations and cash flows could suffer.

Limitations on the number of sites available for placement of factory-built homes or on the operation of factory-built housing communities could reduce the demand for factory-built homes and, as a result, our sales. Factory-built housing communities and individual home placements are subject to local zoning ordinances and other local regulations relating to utility service and construction of roadways. In the past, some property owners have resisted the adoption of zoning ordinances permitting the use of factory-built homes in residential areas, which we believe has restricted the growth of the industry. Factory-built homes may not receive widespread acceptance and localities may not adopt zoning ordinances permitting the development of factory-built home communities. If the factory-built housing industry is unable to secure favorable local zoning ordinances, then our sales could decline and our results of operations and cash flows could suffer.

We may not be able to manage our business effectively if we cannot retain current management team members or if we are unable to attract and motivate key personnel.

Our success depends upon sales, historical claimsthe skills, experience, and management’s judgment regarding anticipated ratesactive participation of our senior management and key employees, many of whom have been with us for a significant number of years. Changes in our senior management team or other key employees may result in operational disruptions and changes to the strategy of our business, and our business might be harmed as a result. Our business could be further disrupted and harmed if we were unable to find appropriate replacements on a timely basis following future departures.

We may not be able to attract or motivate qualified management and operations personnel in the future. Inability to do so would result in constraints that would significantly impede the achievement of our objectives. We may also have difficulty attracting experienced personnel and may be required to expend significant financial resources in our employee recruitment efforts.

Product liability claims and litigation and warranty claims. Significant changesclaims that arise in these factorsthe ordinary course of business may be costly, which could have a material impact on futureadversely affect our results of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting PronouncementsAs a home builder, we are subject to construction defect and home warranty claims arising in the ordinary course of business. These claims are common in the home building industry and can be costly. In addition, the costs of insuring against construction defect and product liability claims are high. There can be no assurance that this coverage will not be restricted and become more costly. If the limits or coverages of our current and former insurance programs prove inadequate, or we are unable to obtain adequate or reasonably-priced insurance against these types of claims in the future, or the amounts currently provided for future warranty or insurance claims are inadequate, then we may experience losses that could negatively impact our results of operations.

In February 2016,We record expenses and liabilities based on the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02,Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lesseesestimated costs required to recognizecover our self-insured liability under our insurance policies, and estimated costs of potential claims and claim adjustment expenses that are above our coverage limits or that are not covered by our insurance policies. These estimated costs are based on an analysis of our historical claims and industry data, and include an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Due to the followingdegree of judgment required and the potential for all leases (withvariability in the exceptionunderlying assumptions when deriving estimated liabilities, our actual future costs could differ from those estimated, and the difference could be material to our results of short-term leases) at the commencement date:operations.

 


A leaseData security breaches, cybersecurity attacks, and other disruptions could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, use, and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our suppliers and business partners, as well as personally identifiable information of our customers and employees. We also have outsourced elements of our information technology structure, and as a result, we are managing independent vendor relationships with third parties who may or could have access to our confidential information. Similarly, our business partners and other third-party providers possess certain of our sensitive data. The secure maintenance of this information is a lessee’s obligationcritical to make lease payments arisingour operations and business strategy. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to cybersecurity attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance, or other disruptions, particularly with employees and others on data networks working increasingly from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and

A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.

Public business entities should apply the amendments in ASU 2016-02 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for all public business entities upon issuance.

Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginninghome because of the earliest comparative period presentedCOVID-19 pandemic and other such factors. We, our partners, vendors, and other third-party providers could be susceptible to third-party attacks on our and their information security systems, which attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise, including criminal groups. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost, or stolen. Any such access, disclosure, or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not requireprivacy of personal information, disrupt our operations, and damage our reputation, any transition accounting for leases that expired beforeof which could adversely affect our business.

We are subject to extensive regulation affecting the earliest comparative period presented.

Lessees may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Corporation anticipates implementing this pronouncement without a material effect onproduction and sale of factory-built housing, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In July 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11,Inventory, which requires an entityWe are subject to measure inventory ata variety of federal, state, and local laws and regulations affecting the lowerproduction and sale of costfactory-built housing. Our failure to comply with such laws and net realizable value. Net realizable value isregulations could expose us to a wide variety of sanctions, including closing one or more manufacturing facilities. Regulatory matters affecting our operations are under regular review by governmental bodies and we cannot predict what effect, if any, new laws and regulations would have on us or on the estimated selling pricesfactory-built housing industry. Failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations or the passage in the ordinary coursefuture of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposalnew and transportation. Publicmore stringent laws, could adversely affect our business, entities should apply ASU No. 2015-11 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation anticipates implementing this pronouncement without a material effect on financial condition, and results of operations.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,Improvements

Increases in the after-tax costs of owning a factory-built home could deter potential customers from buying our products and adversely affect our business or results of operations.

Significant expenses of owning a factory-built home, including mortgage interest expenses and real estate taxes, generally were, under prior tax law, deductible expenses for an individual’s federal income taxes and, in some cases, state income taxes, subject to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions related to: thecertain limitations. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed into law in December 2017 (the “Tax Act”), included provisions that impose limitations with respect to these income tax consequences relateddeductions. Increases in property tax rates or fees on developers by local governmental authorities, as experienced in response to exercisedreduced federal and state funding or vested share-based payment awards;to fund local initiatives, such as funding schools or road improvements, or increases in home insurance premiums, also can adversely affect the ability of potential customers to obtain financing or their desire to purchase new homes, and in turn can have adverse impacts on our business and results of operations.

The transportation industry is subject to government regulation, and regulatory changes could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Our Star Fleet Trucking subsidiary provides transportation services. The transportation industry is subject to legislative or regulatory changes, including potential limits on carbon emissions under climate change legislation and Department of Transportation regulations regarding, among other things, driver breaks, classification of awards as either assets or liabilities;independent drivers, “restart” rules, and the classificationuse of electronic logging devices that can affect the economics of the industry by requiring changes in operating practices or influencing the demand for, and cost of providing, transportation services. We may become subject to new or more restrictive regulations relating to fuel emissions or limits on vehicle weight and size. Future laws and regulations may be more stringent and require changes in operating practices, influence the demand for transportation services or increase the cost of providing transportation services, any of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Natural disasters and severe weather conditions could delay deliveries, increase costs, and decrease demand for new factory-built homes in affected areas.

Our operations are located in many areas that are subject to natural disasters and severe weather. The occurrence of natural disasters or severe weather conditions can delay factory-built home deliveries, increase costs by damaging inventories, reduce the availability of materials, and negatively impact the demand for new factory-built homes in affected areas. Furthermore, if our


insurance does not fully cover business interruptions or losses resulting from these events, then our earnings, liquidity, or capital resources could be adversely affected.

Mergers and acquisitions in which we might engage involve risks that could adversely affect our business.

As part of our growth strategy, we may choose to engage in discussions and negotiations regarding transactions, such as mergers, acquisitions and other business combinations within our industry. The purchase price for possible acquisitions of businesses and assets might be paid from cash, borrowings, or through the issuance of common stock or other securities, or a combination of these methods. Business combinations entail numerous risks, including:

difficulties in the integration of acquired operations, services and products, which can impact retention of client accounts;

failure to achieve expected synergies;

diversion of management's attention from other business concerns;

assumption of unknown material liabilities of acquired companies, which could become material or subject us to litigation or regulatory risks;

amortization of acquired intangible assets, which could reduce future reported earnings; and

potential loss of customers or key employees.

We cannot be certain that we will be able to identify, consummate and successfully integrate business combinations, and no assurance can be given with respect to the timing, likelihood or business effect of any possible transaction. For example, we could begin negotiations that we subsequently decide to suspend or terminate for a variety of reasons. Also, business combinations are typically subject to closing conditions, including regulatory approvals and the absence of a material adverse change. Therefore, if and when we enter into a business combination agreement, there can be no guarantee that the transaction will close when expected, or at all. If a material transaction does not close, then our stock price could decline.

Nevertheless, opportunities arise from time to time that we choose to evaluate. Any transactions that we pursue and consummate would involve these risks and uncertainties, as well as others. The risks of a business combination could result in the consolidatedfailure of the anticipated benefits of that particular combination to be realized, which in turn could have adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Changes in foreign exchange rates could adversely affect the value of our investments in Canada and cause foreign exchange losses.

We have substantial investments in businesses in Canada. Unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates could adversely affect the value of our investments in these businesses.

Our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could harm our business and financial results.

Our management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that we would prevent or detect a misstatement of our financial statements or fraud.

We anticipate paying no cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, for the foreseeable future, to fund the development and growth of cash flows. In addition, ASU 2016-09 providesour business. As a result, capital appreciation in the price of our common stock, if any, will be investors’ only source of gain on an accounting policy electioninvestment in our common stock. Any future determination to account for forfeitures as they occur. For public entities, this update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016,pay dividends to shareholders will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Corporation has elected to continue its current policy of estimating forfeitures rather than recognizing forfeitures when they occur, and anticipates implementing this pronouncement without a material effect onwill depend upon many factors, including general economic conditions, our financial condition and results of operations, upon adoptionour available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, the implications of the payment of dividends by us to our shareholders or by our subsidiaries to us, and any other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.


An impairment of all or part of our goodwill could adversely affect our operating results and net worth.

As of March 28, 2020, 22% of our total assets consisted of goodwill, all of which is allocated to reporting units included in the U.S. Factory-built Housing segment. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other ("ASC 350"), we test goodwill at least annually for impairment or more often than annually if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment is more likely than not to have occurred. If goodwill has become impaired, we charge the impairment as an expense in the period in which the impairment occurs. See Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies" and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. A write-off of all or part of our goodwill could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The replacement or modification of LIBOR as a reference rate could increase our interest expense in the future.

The London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) is expected to be phased out by the end of 2021. LIBOR is currently used as the reference rate on our credit facility, which matures on June 1, 2017.5, 2023. Currently, no replacement rate has been identified. The transition from LIBOR could result in higher interest expense than has historically been recognized.

Our risk management practices may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk.

Our management team is responsible for managing risk, subject to oversight by our board of directors. Our risk management methods may not identify all future risk exposures and may not be completely effective in mitigating all key risks. Furthermore, our risk management methods may not properly identify and mitigate the aggregation of risks across the Company or the interdependency of our risk mitigation efforts. In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 66). The core principaladdition, some of ASU 2014-09 isour risk management methods may be based on assumptions that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expectswill prove to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For a public entity, this guidance is effective for annual reporting periods after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is permitted. Subsequentinaccurate. Failure to the issuance of ASU No. 2014-09, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. In addition, FASB subsequently issued ASU 2016-08,Principal versus Agent

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements — (Continued)

Considerations, ASU 2016-10,Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, ASU 2016-11,Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting, and ASU 2016-12,Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. The Corporation is currently evaluating how the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will impact its financial position and result of operations.

In November 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. ASU 2015-17 requires deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. For public companies this update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual period. The Corporation adopted this pronouncement at the beginning of fiscal 2017 without a material effect onmanage risk effectively could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Impact of Inflation


ITEM1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM2. PROPERTIES

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our operating facilities as of March 28, 2020:  

Location

Owned/Leased

United States

Chandler, Arizona

Leased *

Corona, California

Leased

Lindsay, California

Owned

San Jacinto, California

Owned

Woodland, California

Owned

Lake City, Florida (two facilities)

Leased *

Ocala, Florida

Owned

Weiser, Idaho

Owned

Topeka, Indiana (three facilities)

Owned

Arkansas City, Kansas

Owned

Benton, Kentucky

Leased

Leesville, Louisiana

Leased

Worthington, Minnesota

Owned

Lillington, North Carolina

Owned

York, Nebraska

Owned

Sangerfield, New York

Owned

Sugar Creek, Ohio

Owned

McMinnville, Oregon

Owned

Claysburg, Pennsylvania

Owned

Ephrata, Pennsylvania

Owned

Leola, Pennsylvania

Owned

Liverpool, Pennsylvania

Owned

Strattanville, Pennsylvania

Owned

Dresden, Tennessee

Leased

Athens, Texas

Owned

Burleson, Texas (two facilities)

Owned

Mansfield, Texas

Owned

Lancaster, Wisconsin

Owned

Canada

Lethbridge, Alberta

Leased *

Medicine Hat, Alberta

Owned

Penticton, British Columbia

Owned

Kelowna, British Columbia

Leased

Estevan, Saskatchewan

Owned

* -- land only leased; facility owned


Our corporate headquarters is in Troy, Michigan and we have an administrative office in Elkhart, Indiana. We also have 21 retail sales centers located across seven states in the U.S. and ten terminals for our logistics operations across five states in the U.S. The corporate offices, retail sales centers, and logistics terminals are leased properties. The contractual lease for our Troy, Michigan office expires in December 2022 and for our Elkhart, Indiana office in September 2023. Four of the above manufacturing facilities are encumbered under the revolving credit facility and two of the manufacturing facilities are encumbered by industrial revenue bonds. In the opinion of management, our properties have been well maintained, are in sound operating condition, and contain all equipment and facilities necessary to operate at present levels.

At March 28, 2020, we also own or lease five manufacturing facilities that have been idled since 2017 or prior and could be utilized for additional production capacity.

We are party to certain legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course and are incidental to our business. Certain of the claims pending against us in these proceedings allege, among other things, breach of express and implied warranties, and in various governmental agency proceedings arising from occupational safety and health, wage and hour, and similar employment and workplace regulations. Although litigation is inherently uncertain, based on past experience and the information currently available, management does not believe that the currently pending and threatened litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, future events or circumstances, currently unknown to us, will determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations in any future reporting periods.

ITEM4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


PART II

ITEM5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

The Company's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol SKY.

Holders

As of May 13, 2020, the Company had approximately 512 holders of record of our common stock. The actual number of shareholders is greater than this number of record holders and includes shareholders who are beneficial owners but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees. This number of holders of record also does not include shareholders whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.

Dividend Policy

The Company does not currently pay dividends on our common stock and intends to retain all available funds and any future earnings for general corporate purposes. However, in the future, subject to the factors described below and our future liquidity and capitalization, the Company may change this policy and choose to pay dividends. Any future determination to pay dividends to shareholders will be at the sole discretion of the Company’s board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including general economic conditions, our financial position and results of operations, available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, the implications of the payment of dividends by the Company to its shareholders or by the Company’s subsidiaries and any other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.  

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the period covered by this Annual Report.

Issuer Purchases of Securities

There were no stock repurchases that were part of a publicly announced plan during the period covered by this Annual Report.  

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” of this Annual Report contains certain information relating to the Company’s equity compensation plans.

Stock Performance

The following graph shows the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock over the period spanning March 31, 2015 to March 31, 2020, as compared with that of the Russell 3000 Index and a selected peer group of comparable, publicly traded companies in the factory-built housing segment, based on an initial investment of $100 on March 31, 2015.


Total stockholder return is measured by dividing share price change plus dividends, if any, for each period by the share price at the beginning of the respective period and assumes reinvestment of dividends. This stock performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC or subject to Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

 

March 31, 2017

 

 

March 31, 2018

 

 

March 31, 2019

 

 

March 31, 2020

 

Skyline Champion Corporation

$

100.00

 

 

 

261.58

 

 

 

266.10

 

 

 

621.47

 

 

 

536.72

 

 

 

442.94

 

Russell 3000

 

100.00

 

 

 

99.66

 

 

 

117.66

 

 

 

133.92

 

 

 

145.66

 

 

 

132.36

 

Peer Group*

 

100.00

 

 

 

84.64

 

 

 

100.83

 

 

 

130.07

 

 

 

112.85

 

 

 

88.42

 

*The peer group consisted of Beazer Homes USA, Cavco Industries, Century Communities, LGI Homes, MDC Holdings, M/I Homes, Meritage Homes, Quanex Building Products Corp, and Tri Pointe Group.


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents selected consolidated financial data regarding Skyline Champion for the fiscal years indicated. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the information presented in “Risk Factors,” "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected financial data set forth below may not be indicative of our future performance.

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

March 28, 2020

 

 

March 30, 2019

 

 

March 31, 2018

 

 

April 1,

2017

 

 

April 2,

2016

 

 

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Statement of Operations Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-Built Housing

$

1,226,393

 

 

$

1,177,687

 

 

$

860,488

 

 

$

678,296

 

 

$

573,945

 

Canadian Factory-Built Housing

 

84,196

 

 

 

98,567

 

 

 

96,603

 

 

 

92,631

 

 

 

96,881

 

Corporate/Other

 

59,141

 

 

 

83,789

 

 

 

107,631

 

 

 

90,392

 

 

 

80,877

 

Total net sales

 

1,369,730

 

 

 

1,360,043

 

 

 

1,064,722

 

 

 

861,319

 

 

 

751,703

 

Cost of sales

 

1,090,755

 

 

 

1,114,684

 

 

 

887,611

 

 

 

717,364

 

 

 

638,571

 

Gross Margin

 

278,975

 

 

 

245,359

 

 

 

177,111

 

 

 

143,955

 

 

 

113,132

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

186,855

 

 

 

270,158

 

 

 

122,582

 

 

 

105,175

 

 

 

92,394

 

Foreign currency transaction losses (gains)

 

235

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

(547

)

 

 

3,688

 

 

 

3,173

 

Amortization of intangibles

 

5,430

 

 

 

4,820

 

 

 

487

 

 

 

442

 

 

 

407

 

Operating income (loss)

 

86,455

 

 

 

(29,742

)

 

 

54,589

 

 

 

34,650

 

 

 

17,158

 

Net interest expense

 

1,401

 

 

 

3,290

 

 

 

4,185

 

 

 

4,264

 

 

 

3,658

 

Other expense

 

-

 

 

 

8,271

 

 

 

7,288

 

 

 

2,380

 

 

 

632

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

85,054

 

 

 

(41,303

)

 

 

43,116

 

 

 

28,006

 

 

 

12,868

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

26,894

 

 

 

16,905

 

 

 

27,316

 

 

 

(23,321

)

 

 

2,640

 

Net income (loss) from continuing operations

 

58,160

 

 

 

(58,208

)

 

 

15,800

 

 

 

51,327

 

 

 

10,228

 

Gain (loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

583

 

 

 

(10,248

)

Net income (loss)

$

58,160

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

15,800

 

 

$

51,910

 

 

$

(20

)

Other financial information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by continuing operations

$

76,743

 

 

$

65,228

 

 

$

31,623

 

 

$

34,289

 

 

$

37,258

 

Cash flows used in discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(830

)

 

 

(16,339

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

18,546

 

 

 

16,079

 

 

 

8,260

 

 

 

7,245

 

 

 

6,258

 

Capital expenditures

 

15,389

 

 

 

12,092

 

 

 

9,442

 

 

 

6,955

 

 

 

3,712

 

Net property, plant, and equipment

 

109,291

 

 

 

108,587

 

 

 

67,960

 

 

 

66,577

 

 

 

58,915

 

Total assets

 

781,700

 

 

 

699,954

 

 

 

395,398

 

 

 

328,021

 

 

 

255,349

 

Long-term debt

 

77,330

 

 

 

54,330

 

 

 

58,927

 

 

 

59,331

 

 

 

59,749

 


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following should be read in conjunction with Skyline Champion Corporation’s consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Certain statements set forth below under this caption constitute forward-looking statements. See Part I, “Cautionary Statement About Forward-Looking Statements,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional factors relating to such statements, and see Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of this Annual Report for a discussion of certain risks applicable to our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Overview

Champion Enterprises Holding, LLC (“Champion Holdings”) was formed as a Delaware limited liability company in 2010. Skyline Corporation (“Skyline”) was originally incorporated in Indiana. On June 1, 2018, Skyline Champion Corporation (the “Company”) was formed by Skyline and Champion Holdings combining their operations pursuant to the Exchange Agreement.

The Company is a leading producer of factory-built housing in the U.S. and Canada. The Company serves as a complete solutions provider across complementary and vertically integrated businesses including manufactured construction, company-owned retail locations, and transportation logistics services. The Company is the largest independent publicly traded factory-built solutions provider in North America based on revenue, and markets its homes under several nationally recognized brand names including Skyline Homes, Champion Home Builders, Genesis Homes, Athens Park Models, Dutch Housing, Excel Homes, Homes of Merit, New Era, Redman Homes, Shore Park, Silvercrest, and Titan Homes in the U.S. and Moduline and SRI Homes in western Canada. At March 28, 2020, the Company operates 33 manufacturing facilities throughout the U.S. and 5 manufacturing facilities in western Canada that primarily construct factory-built, timber-framed manufactured and modular houses that are sold primarily to independent retailers, builders/developers, and manufactured home community operators. The Company’s retail operations consist of 21 sales centers that sell manufactured homes to consumers primarily in the southern U.S. The Company’s transportation business engages independent owners/drivers to transport manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, and other products throughout the U.S. and Canada.

Acquisitions and Expansions

Over the last several years, demand for the Company’s products, primarily affordable housing in the U.S., has continued to improve. As a result, the Company has focused on operational improvements to make existing manufacturing facilities more profitable as well as executing measured expansion of its manufacturing and retail footprint.

The Company has increased capacity through strategic acquisitions and expansions of its manufacturing footprint. The Company is focused on growing in strong HUD markets across the U.S. as well as further expanding into the Northeast and Midwest U.S. modular housing markets. The Company began production at its newest manufactured housing facility in Leesville, Louisiana in June 2019. During fiscal 2019, the Company completed its expansion of the Corona, California facility by adding a second production line and expanded its Leola, Pennsylvania campus by adding an additional plant. Production at the Leola facility began in April 2019. The Exchange added eight plants to the Company’s manufacturing footprint in fiscal 2019.

The Company has also focused on expansion of its company-owned retail operations, opening three additional retail sales centers during fiscal 2018. Management believes retail expansion provides an opportunity to increase the Company’s presence in market segments that are not currently served through its independent retail network, while also providing for increased utilization of existing manufacturing operations.

These acquisitions and investments are part of a strategy to grow and diversify revenue with a focus on increasing the Company’s HUD and modular homebuilding presence in the U.S. as well as improving the results of operations. These acquisitions and investments are included in the consolidated results for periods subsequent to their respective acquisition dates.


Combination with Skyline

On January 5, 2018, Champion Holdings and Skyline entered into an Exchange Agreement pursuant to which the two companies agreed to combine their operations. The Exchange was completed on June 1, 2018 and was accounted for as a reverse acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting as provided by FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). Champion Holdings was determined to be the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed by Champion Holdings as a result of the Exchange were recorded at their respective fair values and added to the carrying value of Champion Holdings existing assets and liabilities. As Champion Holdings is the accounting acquirer, reported financial results for Skyline Champion Corporation for fiscal 2019 are comprised of: 1) the results of Champion Holdings through June 1, 2018 and 2) the combined operations of the Company, after giving effect to the Exchange, from June 1, 2018 through March 30, 2019. All annual periods presented prior to the effective date of the Exchange are comprised solely of the results of Champion Holdings and all annual periods presented subsequent to fiscal 2019 are comprised solely of the results of the Company.

Industry and Company Outlook

In recent years, manufactured home construction experienced revenue growth due to a number of favorable demographic trends and demand drivers in the United States, including underlying growth trends in key homebuyer groups, such as the population over 65 years of age, the population of first-time home buyers, and the population of households earning less than $50,000 per year. More recently, we see a number of market trends pointing to increased sales of ADUs and urban to rural migration as customers accommodate working-from-home patterns and protocols, as well as people seeking rent-to-own single-family options. We intend to capitalize on these trends and drivers to grow our business over the medium to long-term. We believe that there is an opportunity for continued manufactured and modular construction market with medium term expansion driven by the foregoing trends and demand drivers, as well as construction labor shortages in certain regions (which tend to adversely and disproportionally impact supply and cost of site-built homes when compared to manufactured housing) and increased affordability of factory-built homes relative to site-built homes.

For fiscal 2020, approximately 76% of the Company’s U.S. manufacturing sales were generated from the manufacture of homes that comply with the Federal HUD code construction standard in the U.S. According to data reported by MHI, HUD code industry home shipments were 97,553; 93,265 and 90,729 units (excluding FEMA units) during fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Industry shipments of HUD-code FEMA units were 112 and 4,315 in fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. There were no industry shipments of HUD code FEMA units in fiscal 2020 or 2019. Based on industry data, the Company’s U.S. wholesale market share of HUD code homes sold was 16.5%, 16.6%, 13.9% in fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018. Annual shipments have generally increased each year since calendar year 2009 when only 50,000 HUD code manufactured homes were shipped, the lowest level since the industry began recording statistics in 1959. While shipments of HUD code manufactured homes have improved modestly in recent years, manufactured housing’s most recent annual shipment levels still operate at lower levels than the long-term historical average of over 200,000 units annually.

For fiscal 2020, approximately 17% of the Company’s U.S. manufacturing sales were generated from the sale of modular homes. The Company measures and reports on U.S. modular market share three months in arrears. Industry shipments of modular homes in the U.S. of 14,690 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was 5.4% lower than the 15,530 units shipped in the comparable period of calendar year 2018. The Company’s modular market share during these periods was 13.9% and 13.1%, respectively. Modular home sales across the industry have generally been stable since 2009.

COVID-19 Pandemic

The outbreak of COVID-19 has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization and continues to spread in the United States and Canada. The COVID-19 pandemic poses the risk that the Company or its employees, suppliers, customers and others may be restricted or prevented from conducting business activities for indefinite or intermittent periods of time, including as a result of employee health and safety concerns, shutdowns, shelter in place orders, travel restrictions and other actions and restrictions that may be requested or mandated by governmental authorities.

In response to dynamics brought on by COVID-19, the Company has prioritized the safety and well-being of its employees and customers. Skyline Champion has carefully managed expenses by reducing non-essential spending and furloughing certain employees with many now taking advantage of benefits provided by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”). Beginning in March 2020, the Company temporarily idled several of its manufacturing facilities due to stay-at-home orders, supplier disruptions, and a decline in demand resulting from these restrictions as well as the temporary closure of some of the Company’s independent retailers. Upon initial shelter-in-place orders, Skyline Champion rolled out a temporary emergency sick pay policy which allowed limited pay for employees impacted by COVID-19. During April 2020, the Company reduced its workforce by 5%, to


approximately 6,600 employees and furloughed many more employees due to government stay-at-home orders or reduced demand. During this time, the Company chose to continue to pay its share of the costs associated with providing uninterrupted health care benefits to its furloughed employees.

The Company reopened many of the temporarily idled manufacturing facilities in late April, at reduced production levels due to social distancing protocols and decreased demand. Skyline Champion will continue to manage its manufacturing footprint and be prepared to reopen or idle additional facilities as restrictions change and demand warrants. Further, the Company may experience disruptions in its supply chain which could increase material costs for its products. There is significant uncertainty regarding the extent and duration of the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on the economy and the housing market. As a result, its impact on the Company’s fiscal 2021 results is uncertain. As the U.S. economy gradually recovers from the impacts of COVID-19, the Company will seek to capture additional demand from manufactured housing communities that increase spending on expansion and development projects. In addition, if financing availability continues to improve and related regulation continues to ease, the Company believes that there will be an increase in the number of prospective customers who qualify for home loans for manufactured and modular homes. The Company remains confident in the long-term growth opportunities and believes that it has sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its liquidity needs in the next twelve months. As of March 28, 2020, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $209.5 million.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL 2020 VS. 2019

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

 

 

 

Results of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,369,730

 

 

$

1,360,043

 

Cost of sales

 

 

1,090,755

 

 

 

1,114,684

 

Gross profit

 

 

278,975

 

 

 

245,359

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

 

192,520

 

 

 

275,101

 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

86,455

 

 

 

(29,742

)

Interest expense, net

 

 

1,401

 

 

 

3,290

 

Other expense

 

 

 

 

 

8,271

 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

 

85,054

 

 

 

(41,303

)

Income tax expense

 

 

26,894

 

 

 

16,905

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

58,160

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

58,160

 

 

$

(58,208

)

Income tax expense

 

 

26,894

 

 

 

16,905

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

1,401

 

 

 

3,290

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

18,546

 

 

 

16,079

 

Equity-based compensation (for awards granted prior to December 31, 2018)

 

 

4,576

 

 

 

101,025

 

Foreign currency transaction loss

 

 

235

 

 

 

123

 

Transaction costs

 

 

 

 

 

8,201

 

Acquisition integration costs

 

 

2,674

 

 

 

7,966

 

Fair market value adjustment for asset classified as held for sale

 

 

986

 

 

 

 

Property, plant, and equipment impairment charge

 

 

550

 

 

 

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

366

 

 

 

1,640

 

Other

 

 

(24

)

 

 

70

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

114,364

 

 

$

97,091

 

As a percent of net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

20.4

%

 

 

18.0

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

14.1

%

 

 

20.2

%

Operating income (loss)

 

 

6.3

%

 

 

(2.2

%)

Net income (loss)

 

 

4.2

%

 

 

(4.3

%)

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

8.3

%

 

 

7.1

%


NET SALES

The following table summarizes net sales for fiscal 2020 and 2019:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,369,730

 

 

$

1,360,043

 

 

$

9,687

 

 

 

0.7

%

U.S. manufacturing and retail net sales

 

$

1,226,393

 

 

$

1,177,687

 

 

$

48,706

 

 

 

4.1

%

U.S. homes sold

 

 

20,110

 

 

 

19,443

 

 

 

667

 

 

 

3.4

%

U.S. manufacturing and retail average home selling price

 

$

61.0

 

 

$

60.6

 

 

$

0.4

 

 

 

0.7

%

Canadian manufacturing net sales

 

$

84,196

 

 

$

98,567

 

 

$

(14,371

)

 

 

(14.6

%)

Canadian homes sold

 

 

1,002

 

 

 

1,232

 

 

 

(230

)

 

 

(18.7

%)

Canadian manufacturing average home selling price

 

$

84.0

 

 

$

80.0

 

 

$

4.0

 

 

 

5.0

%

Corporate/Other net sales

 

$

59,141

 

 

$

83,789

 

 

$

(24,648

)

 

 

(29.4

%)

U.S. manufacturing facilities in operation at year end

 

 

33

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

6.5

%

U.S. retail sales centers in operation at year end

 

 

21

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

Canadian manufacturing facilities in operation at year end

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

Net sales for fiscal 2020 were $1,369.7 million, an increase of $9.7 million, or 0.7% over fiscal 2019. The following is a summary of the change by operating segment.

U.S. Factory-built Housing:

Sales of homes for the Company’s U.S. manufacturing and retail operations increased by $48.7 million, or 4.1%. The net sales increase was attributable to the following factors including: (i) an increase of 667, or 3.4%, in the number of homes sold and (ii) a 0.7% increase in the average home selling price. The inclusion of the Skyline operations for the full year of fiscal 2020 added $48.2 million of sales, as fiscal 2019 included only ten months of Skyline operations.

Canadian Factory-built Housing:

The Canadian Factory-built Housing segment net sales decreased by $14.4 million, or 14.6% for fiscal 2020 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to an 18.7% decrease in homes sold. This decrease was partially offset by a 5.0% increase the average selling price of homes. The number of homes sold decreased due to the decline in factory-built housing demand in the British Columbia and Alberta provinces versus the same period in the prior year. The decline in demand was and is due to oil and energy-related market dynamics in western Canada. Net sales for the Canadian segment were also unfavorably impacted by approximately $1.3 million as the Canadian dollar weakened relative to the U.S. dollar during fiscal 2020 as compared to the same period of the prior year.

Corporate/Other:

Net sales for Corporate/Other includes the Company’s transportation business and the elimination of intersegment sales. For fiscal 2020, net sales decreased by $24.6 million, or 29.4%. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales in the Company’s transportation business primarily as a result of lower shipments associated with reduced RV demand in the U.S. and changes in customer mix, partially offset by increased net sales of manufactured housing products.  


GROSS PROFIT

The following table summarizes gross profit for fiscal 2020 and 2019:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing

 

$

250,222

 

 

$

214,142

 

 

$

36,080

 

 

 

16.8

%

Canadian Factory-built Housing

 

 

16,512

 

 

 

18,309

 

 

 

(1,797

)

 

 

(9.8

%)

Corporate/Other

 

 

12,241

 

 

 

12,908

 

 

 

(667

)

 

 

(5.2

%)

Total gross profit

 

$

278,975

 

 

$

245,359

 

 

$

33,616

 

 

 

13.7

%

Gross profit as a percent of net sales

 

 

20.4

%

 

 

18.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit as a percent of sales during fiscal 2020 was 20.4% compared to 18.0% during fiscal 2019. The following is a summary of the change by operating segment.

U.S. Factory-built Housing:

Gross profit for the U.S. Factory-built Housing segment increased by $36.1 million, or 16.8%, during fiscal 2020 compared to the prior year. The increase in gross profit is due to the increase in sales volume and improved margins resulting from a reduction in manufacturing costs. Gross profit was 20.4% as a percent of segment net sales for fiscal 2020 compared to 18.2% in the prior year. Gross profit expansion was driven by favorable material pricing, procurement and operational synergies related to the Exchange, and plant operating improvements, all of which were partially offset by labor inflation.

Canadian Factory-built Housing:

Gross profit for the Canadian Factory-built Housing segment decreased by $1.8 million, or 9.8%, during fiscal 2020 compared to the prior year and increased to 19.6% as a percent of segment net sales from 18.6%. Although the Canadian Factory-built Housing segment saw lower volume compared to the prior period, margins improved due to higher average selling prices on homes sold.

Corporate/Other:

Gross profit for the Corporate/Other segment decreased by $0.7 million, or 5.2%, during fiscal 2020 compared to the same period in the prior year. However, Corporate/Other gross profit improved as a percent of segment net sales to 20.7% from 15.4%. Gross margins for the Company’s transportation business improved as a percent of sales due to a change in revenue mix and lower variable expenses. A portion of the change in revenue mix is due in part to changes in the customer base, which included less brokered business to other providers at lower margins in response to the decline in revenue caused by the softening market demand for RVs.

SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general, and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses include foreign currency transaction gains and losses, equity compensation, and intangible amortization expense. The following table summarizes selling, general, and administrative expenses for fiscal 2020 and 2019:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing

 

$

135,329

 

 

$

116,379

 

 

$

18,950

 

 

 

16.3

%

Canadian Factory-built Housing

 

 

8,313

 

 

 

9,058

 

 

 

(745

)

 

 

(8.2

%)

Corporate/Other

 

 

48,878

 

 

 

149,664

 

 

 

(100,786

)

 

 

(67.3

%)

Total selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

$

192,520

 

 

$

275,101

 

 

$

(82,581

)

 

 

(30.0

%)

Selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales

 

 

14.1

%

 

 

20.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $192.5 million for fiscal 2020, a decrease of $82.6 million compared to the prior year. The following is a summary of the change by operating segment.

U.S. Factory-built Housing:

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the U.S. Factory-built Housing segment increased by $19.0 million, or 16.3%, during fiscal 2020 as compared to the prior year. Selling, general, and administrative expenses, as a percent of segment net sales, was 11.0% for fiscal 2020 compared to 9.9% during fiscal 2019. SG&A costs increased due to a combination of factors, and was primarily driven by: (i) an increase in salaries and benefits to maintain competitive compensation packages to retain and recruit team members, and (ii) higher sales commissions and incentive compensation, which is generally based on sales volume or a measure of profitability. The increase in salaries, benefits, and incentive compensation was approximately $7.7 million in total. In addition, the inclusion of the Skyline operations for all twelve months of fiscal 2020 increased SG&A expenses by $4.7 million compared to fiscal 2019, which included only ten months of Skyline operations. Lastly, the Company recorded additional SG&A costs for the Leesville, LA capacity expansion of $2.0 million and increased spending on marketing and advertising initiatives of $1.0 million during fiscal 2020.

Canadian Factory-built Housing:

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the Canadian Factory-built Housing segment decreased by $0.7 million, or 8.2%, during fiscal 2020 as compared to fiscal 2019. As a percent of segment net sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses for the Canadian segment was 9.9% for fiscal 2020 compared to 9.2% for fiscal 2019. Selling, general, and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales increased in the current period due to the decrease in net sales and reduced leverage of fixed costs.

Corporate/Other:

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for Corporate/Other includes the Company’s transportation operations, corporate costs incurred for all segments, and intersegment eliminations. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for Corporate/Other decreased by $100.8 million, or 67.3%, during fiscal 2020 as compared to fiscal 2019. The decrease is mainly due to a change in equity-based compensation expense of $93.7 million, primarily related to the Exchange and secondary offerings that occurred in the prior year, as well as a reduction in acquisition integration and restructuring costs of $6.6 million. This decrease was partially offset by a fair market value adjustment charge of $1.0 million related to property acquired in the Exchange.

INTEREST EXPENSE

The following table summarizes the components of interest expense, net for fiscal 2020 and 2019:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

$

4,632

 

 

$

5,333

 

 

$

(701

)

 

 

(13.1

%)

Interest income

 

 

(3,231

)

 

 

(2,043

)

 

 

(1,188

)

 

 

58.1

%

Interest expense, net

 

$

1,401

 

 

$

3,290

 

 

$

(1,889

)

 

 

(57.4

%)

Average outstanding floor plan payable

 

$

31,962

 

 

$

32,288

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average outstanding long-term debt

 

$

48,747

 

 

$

58,959

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net was $1.4 million for fiscal 2020, a decrease of $1.9 million compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily related to higher interest income recognized during the period as a result of higher average cash balances invested in short term facilities. In addition, the Company incurred reduced interest expense due to; (i) a lower weighted average interest rate on its revolving credit facility of 3.5% as compared to 4.7%, and (ii) lower average outstanding balances on its credit facilities as compared to the same period in the prior year.


OTHER EXPENSE

The following table summarizes other expense for fiscal 2020 and 2019:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other expense

 

$

 

 

$

8,271

 

 

$

(8,271

)

 

 

(100.0

%)

Other expense for fiscal 2019 primarily consisted of $8.2 million of expenses for legal, accounting, and advisory services related to the Exchange and four offerings of the Company’s common stock subsequent to the Exchange (“Offerings”), as well as $0.1 million for the deductible on an insured loss at one of the Company’s retail sales centers. The Company incurred no such costs in fiscal 2020.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

The following table summarizes income tax expense for fiscal 2020 and 2019:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense

 

$

26,894

 

 

$

16,905

 

 

$

9,989

 

 

 

59.1

%

Effective tax rate

 

 

31.6

%

 

 

(40.9

%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense for fiscal 2020 was $26.9 million, representing an effective tax rate of 31.6%, compared to income tax expense of $16.9 million, representing an effective tax rate of (40.9%), for fiscal 2019.

The Company’s effective tax rate for fiscal 2020 differs from the federal statutory income tax rate of 21.0%, due primarily to the effect of non-deductible expenses, tax credits, state and local income taxes, changes in valuation allowances, and results in foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s effective tax rate for fiscal 2019 differed from the federal statutory income tax rate of 21.0%, due primarily to the effect of non-deductible expenses, many of which were a result of the Exchange, state and local income taxes, and results in foreign jurisdictions.

ADJUSTED EBITDA

The following table reconciles net income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, to Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, for fiscal 2020 and 2019:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

58,160

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

116,368

 

 

 

199.9

%

Income tax expense

 

 

26,894

 

 

 

16,905

 

 

 

9,989

 

 

 

59.1

%

Interest expense, net

 

 

1,401

 

 

 

3,290

 

 

 

(1,889

)

 

 

(57.4

%)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

18,546

 

 

 

16,079

 

 

 

2,467

 

 

 

15.3

%

Equity-based compensation (for awards granted prior to December 31, 2018)

 

 

4,576

 

 

 

101,025

 

 

 

(96,449

)

 

 

(95.5

%)

Foreign currency transaction loss

 

 

235

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

112

 

 

 

91.1

%

Transaction costs

 

 

 

 

 

8,201

 

 

 

(8,201

)

 

 

(100.0

%)

Acquisition integration costs

 

 

2,674

 

 

 

7,966

 

 

 

(5,292

)

 

 

(66.4

%)

Fair market value adjustment for asset classified as held for sale

 

 

986

 

 

 

 

 

 

986

 

 

*

 

Property, plant, and equipment impairment charge

 

 

550

 

 

 

 

 

 

550

 

 

*

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

366

 

 

 

1,640

 

 

 

(1,274

)

 

 

(77.7

%)

Other

 

 

(24

)

 

 

70

 

 

 

(94

)

 

 

(134.3

%)

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

114,364

 

 

$

97,091

 

 

$

17,273

 

 

 

17.8

%

* indicates that the calculated percentage is not meaningful


Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2020 was $114.4 million, an increase of $17.3 million over fiscal 2019. The increase is primarily a result of increased operating income after adjusting for the effect of increased depreciation and amortization, transaction, integration and restructuring costs, and non-cash equity-based compensation incurred in connection with the Exchange, and the Offerings and the integration of Skyline. The increase in operating income is primarily due to improvements in sales volumes and gross profit margins as a percent of net sales partially offset by higher selling, general, and administrative costs. See the definition of Adjusted EBITDA under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for additional information regarding the definition and use of this metric in evaluating the Company’s results.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL 2019 VS. 2018

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

Results of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,360,043

 

 

$

1,064,722

 

Cost of sales

 

 

1,114,684

 

 

 

887,611

 

Gross profit

 

 

245,359

 

 

 

177,111

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

 

275,101

 

 

 

122,522

 

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(29,742

)

 

 

54,589

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

3,290

 

 

 

4,185

 

Other expense

 

 

8,271

 

 

 

7,288

 

(Loss) income from operations before income taxes

 

 

(41,303

)

 

 

43,116

 

Income tax expense

 

 

16,905

 

 

 

27,316

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

15,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

15,800

 

Income tax expense

 

 

16,905

 

 

 

27,316

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

3,290

 

 

 

4,185

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

16,079

 

 

 

8,260

 

Equity-based compensation (for awards granted prior to December 31, 2018)

 

 

101,025

 

 

 

642

 

Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)

 

 

123

 

 

 

(548

)

Transaction costs

 

 

8,201

 

 

 

7,267

 

Acquisition integration costs

 

 

7,966

 

 

 

406

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

1,640

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of non-operating facilities

 

 

 

 

 

(106

)

Lower of cost or market adjustment of development inventory

 

 

 

 

 

1,165

 

Other

 

 

70

 

 

 

221

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

97,091

 

 

$

64,608

 

As a percent of net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

18.0

%

 

 

16.6

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

20.2

%

 

 

11.5

%

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(2.2

%)

 

 

5.1

%

Net (loss) income

 

 

(4.3

%)

 

 

1.5

%

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

7.1

%

 

 

6.1

%


NET SALES

The following table summarizes net sales for fiscal 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,360,043

 

 

$

1,064,722

 

 

$

295,321

 

 

 

27.7

%

U.S. manufacturing and retail net sales

 

$

1,177,687

 

 

$

860,488

 

 

$

317,199

 

 

 

36.9

%

U.S. homes sold

 

 

19,443

 

 

 

16,140

 

 

 

3,303

 

 

 

20.5

%

U.S. manufacturing and retail average home selling price

 

$

60.6

 

 

$

53.3

 

 

$

7.3

 

 

 

13.6

%

Canadian manufacturing net sales

 

$

98,567

 

 

$

96,603

 

 

$

1,964

 

 

 

2.0

%

Canadian homes sold

 

 

1,232

 

 

 

1,266

 

 

 

(34

)

 

 

(2.7

%)

Canadian manufacturing average home selling price

 

$

80.0

 

 

$

76.3

 

 

$

4

 

 

 

4.8

%

Corporate/Other net sales

 

$

83,789

 

 

$

107,631

 

 

$

(23,842

)

 

 

(22.2

%)

U.S. manufacturing facilities in operation at year end

 

 

31

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

34.8

%

U.S. retail sales centers in operation at year end

 

 

21

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

Canadian manufacturing facilities in operation at year end

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

Net sales for fiscal 2019 were $1,360.0 million, an increase of $295.3 million, or 27.7% over fiscal 2018. The following is a summary of the change by operating segment.

U.S. Factory-built Housing:

The U.S. Factory-built Housing segment accounted for the majority of the overall growth in net sales for fiscal 2019 compared to the same period in the prior year. Sales of homes for the Company’s U.S. manufacturing and retail operations increased by $317.2 million, or 36.9%. The number of homes sold during fiscal 2019 increased by 3,303 units, or 20.5%. The net sales increase was attributable to the following factors including: (i) the inclusion of net sales of $218.8 million for the Skyline operations for the period following the completion of the Exchange; and (ii) a 13.6% increase in the average home selling price as a result of product mix and pricing actions to offset the impact of fluctuating material and labor costs.

The Company’s U.S. HUD market share for fiscal 2019 grew to 16.6% from 13.9% in the prior year due primarily to the inclusion of Skyline operations. U.S. HUD industry units shipped during fiscal 2019 were 93,377 which represented a slight decrease from the 95,044 units shipped in the prior year. U.S. HUD industry shipments for fiscal 2019 did not include any FEMA disaster relief homes, according to data published by MHI. Fiscal 2019 industry shipments include the sale of 112 disaster relief homes produced for FEMA compared to 4,415 in fiscal 2018.

Canadian Factory-built Housing:

The Canadian Factory-built Housing segment net sales increased by $2.0 million, or 2.0%, for fiscal 2019 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to a 4.8% increase in average selling price, which was a result of pricing actions taken by the Company to offset the impact of rising material and labor costs. This increase was offset by a 2.7% decrease in homes sold. Net sales were unfavorably impacted by approximately $1.9 million as the Canadian dollar weakened compared to the U.S. dollar during fiscal 2019 as compared to the same period of the prior year.

Corporate/Other:

Net sales for Corporate/Other includes the Company’s transportation business and the elimination of intersegment sales. For fiscal 2019, net sales decreased by $23.8 million, or 22.2%. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales in the Company’s transportation business primarily as a result of lower shipments associated with reduced RV demand in the U.S.  


GROSS PROFIT

The following table summarizes gross profit for fiscal 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing

 

$

214,142

 

 

$

143,632

 

 

$

70,510

 

 

 

49.1

%

Canadian Factory-built Housing

 

 

18,309

 

 

 

18,415

 

 

 

(106

)

 

 

(0.6

%)

Corporate/Other

 

 

12,908

 

 

 

15,064

 

 

 

(2,156

)

 

 

(14.3

%)

Total gross profit

 

$

245,359

 

 

$

177,111

 

 

$

68,248

 

 

 

38.5

%

Gross profit as a percent of net sales

 

 

18.0

%

 

 

16.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit as a percent of sales during fiscal 2019 was 18.0% compared to 16.6% during fiscal 2018. The following is a summary of the change by operating segment.

U.S. Factory-built Housing:

Gross profit for the U.S. Factory-built Housing segment increased by $70.5 million, or 49.1%, during fiscal 2019 compared to the prior year. Gross profit was 18.2% as a percent of segment net sales for fiscal 2019 compared to 16.7% in the prior year. The 150 basis point increase in gross profit as a percent of sales is due to a combination of factors. The Company has benefited from the synergy capture from the Exchange with Skyline and continues to standardize its core product design and material purchases which allow for more efficient production for its supply chain and helps to mitigate material commodity fluctuations. The Company also continues to focus on better understanding its cost structure and discontinuing models and options that customers do not value.

Canadian Factory-built Housing:

Gross profit for the Canadian Factory-built Housing segment decreased by $0.1 million, or 0.6%, during fiscal 2019 compared to the prior year and decreased to 18.6% as a percent of segment net sales from 19.1%. The decrease is primarily due to lower sales volume.

Corporate/Other:

Gross profit for the Corporate/Other segment decreased by $2.2 million, or 14.3%, during fiscal 2019 compared to the same period in the prior year. However, Corporate/Other gross profit improved as a percent of segment net sales to 15.4% from 14.0%. Although overall the transportation business activity was lower than the prior year, gross margins improved as a percent of sales due to product mix.

SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:

The following table summarizes selling, general, and administrative expenses for fiscal 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing

 

$

116,379

 

 

$

83,486

 

 

$

32,893

 

 

 

39.4

%

Canadian Factory-built Housing

 

 

9,058

 

 

 

8,768

 

 

 

290

 

 

 

3.3

%

Corporate/Other

 

 

149,664

 

 

 

30,268

 

 

 

119,396

 

 

 

394.5

%

Total selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

$

275,101

 

 

$

122,522

 

 

$

152,579

 

 

 

124.5

%

Selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales

 

 

20.2

%

 

 

11.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $275.1 million for fiscal 2019, an increase of $152.6 million compared to the prior year. The following is a summary of the change by operating segment.

U.S. Factory-built Housing:

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the U.S. Factory-built Housing segment increased by $32.9 million, or 39.4%, during fiscal 2019 as compared to the prior year. The increase was primarily a result of an increase of $14.5 million related to the inclusion of the Skyline operations subsequent to the Exchange, an increase of $8.7 million related to higher sales commissions and incentive compensation (which is generally based on sales volume or a measure of profitability), an increase of $4.3 million for additional amortization related to the Exchange, an increase of approximately $1.0 million related to investments in plant ramp up of previously idled facilities, and $1.9 million of other administrative and marketing costs.As a result of the increases above, selling, general, and administrative expenses, as a percent of segment net sales, was 9.9% for fiscal 2019 compared to 9.7% during fiscal 2018.

Canadian Factory-built Housing:

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the Canadian Factory-built Housing segment increased by $0.3 million, or 3.3%, during fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018. As a percent of segment net sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses for the Canadian segment was 9.2% for fiscal 2019 compared to 9.1% for fiscal 2018.

Corporate/Other:

Selling, general, and administrative expenses for Corporate/Other includes the Company’s transportation operations, corporate costs incurred for all segments and intersegment eliminations. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for Corporate/Other increased by $119.4 million during fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018. The increase is primarily a result of an increase of $101.4 million in non-cash, equity-based compensation expense, an increase of $7.6 million increase for Skyline integration costs, an increase of $3.1 million of costs related to the inclusion of the Skyline corporate departments subsequent to the Exchange, an increase of $2.4 million in legal and professional fees, and an increase of $1.6 million of restructuring costs primarily related to redundant corporate and administrative costs subsequent to the Exchange.

INTEREST EXPENSE, NET

The following table summarizes the components of interest expense, net for fiscal 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

$

5,333

 

 

$

5,133

 

 

$

200

 

 

 

3.9

%

Interest income

 

 

(2,043

)

 

 

(948

)

 

 

(1,095

)

 

 

115.5

%

Interest expense, net

 

$

3,290

 

 

$

4,185

 

 

$

(895

)

 

 

(21.4

%)

Average outstanding floor plan payable

 

$

32,288

 

 

$

21,739

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average outstanding long-term debt

 

$

58,959

 

 

$

59,604

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net was $3.3 million for fiscal 2019, a decrease of $0.9 million compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily related to higher interest income recognized during the period as a result of higher average cash balances invested in short term facilities.

OTHER EXPENSE

The following table summarizes other expense for fiscal 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other expense

 

$

8,271

 

 

$

7,288

 

 

$

983

 

 

 

13.5

%


Other expense for fiscal 2019 primarily consisted of $8.2 million of expenses for legal, accounting, and advisory services related to the Exchange and four offerings of the Company’s common stock subsequent to the Exchange (“Offerings”), as well as $0.1 million for the deductible on an insured loss at one of the Company’s retail sales centers. During fiscal 2018, the Company incurred $7.3 million of expenses related to legal and accounting services associated with the Exchange.

Income Tax Expense

The following table summarizes income tax expense for fiscal 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense

 

$

16,905

 

 

$

27,316

 

 

$

(10,411

)

 

 

(38.1

%)

Effective tax rate

 

 

(40.9

%)

 

 

63.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense for fiscal 2019 was $16.9 million, representing an effective tax rate of (40.9)%, compared to income tax expense of $27.3 million, representing an effective tax rate of 63.4%, for fiscal 2018.

The Company’s effective tax rate for fiscal 2019 differs from the federal statutory income tax rate of 21.0%, due primarily to the effect of non-deductible expenses, many of which were a result of the Exchange, state and local income taxes, and results in foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s effective tax rate for fiscal 2018 differed from the blended federal statutory rate of 31.5% primarily due to the remeasurement of U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities at the new corporate income tax rate of 21%, from 35% due to the comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act ”) as well as the effect of non-deductible expense, state and local income taxes, and results of operations in foreign jurisdictions and non-taxable entities.

Adjusted EBITDA

The following table reconciles net income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, to Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, for fiscal 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

$

Change

 

 

%

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(58,208

)

 

 

 

$

15,800

 

 

$

(74,008

)

 

*

 

Income tax expense

 

 

16,905

 

 

 

 

 

27,316

 

 

 

(10,411

)

 

 

(38.1

%)

Interest expense, net

 

 

3,290

 

 

 

 

 

4,185

 

 

 

(895

)

 

 

(21.4

%)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

16,079

 

 

 

 

 

8,260

 

 

 

7,819

 

 

 

94.7

%

Equity-based compensation (for awards granted prior to December 31, 2018)

 

 

101,025

 

 

 

 

 

642

 

 

 

100,383

 

 

*

 

Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)

 

 

123

 

 

 

 

 

(548

)

 

 

671

 

 

 

(122.4

%)

Transaction costs

 

 

8,201

 

 

 

 

 

7,267

 

 

 

934

 

 

 

12.9

%

Acquisition integration costs

 

 

7,966

 

 

 

 

 

406

 

 

 

7,560

 

 

*

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

1,640

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,640

 

 

*

 

Gain on sale of non-operating facilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(106

)

 

 

106

 

 

*

 

Lower of cost or market adjustment of development inventory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,165

 

 

 

(1,165

)

 

*

 

Other

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

(151

)

 

 

(68.3

%)

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

97,091

 

 

 

 

$

64,608

 

 

$

32,483

 

 

 

50.3

%

*indicates that the calculated percentage is not meaningful

Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2019 was $97.1 million, an increase of $32.5 million over fiscal 2018. The increase is primarily a result of increased operating income after adjusting for the effect of increased depreciation and amortization, transaction, integration, restructuring costs and non-cash equity-based compensation incurred in connection with the Exchange, and the Offerings and the


integration of Skyline. The increase in operating income is primarily due to improvements in sales volumes and gross profit margins as a percent of net sales partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative costs. See the definition of Adjusted EBITDA under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for additional information regarding the definition and use of this metric in evaluating the Company’s results.

Pro Forma Results of Operations

In addition to the analysis of historical results of operations, this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes unaudited supplemental pro forma results of operations for fiscal 2019 and 2018. The unaudited pro forma results of operations reflect pro forma adjustments to the results of the Company to give effect to the Exchange and the related financing transactions (the “Financing”) as if they had occurred on April 2, 2017, the beginning of fiscal 2018.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information of the Company combines the accounting periods of Champion Holdings and Skyline Corporation. Champion Holdings and Skyline had different fiscal year ends. Regulation S-X, Rule 11-02(c)(3) allows the combination of financial information for companies if their fiscal years end within 93 days of each other. Skyline’s results for these periods were derived from their unaudited consolidated income statements. Champion Holdings’ historical results are derived from Champion Holdings’ consolidated statements of operations for fiscal 2019 and 2018.

The unaudited pro forma adjustments, for activities up to the date of the Exchange, include:

Adjustments to depreciation expense for the stepped-up basis of property, plant, and equipment;

Adjustments to the amortization of intangible assets recognized in connection with the Exchange;

Adjustments to interest expense for the elimination of historical interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees on retired debt;

Recognition of interest expense and amortization of deferred financing fees on the new revolving credit agreement;

Adjustments to eliminate expenses incurred directly related to the Exchange;

Adjustments to eliminate one-time equity-based compensation incurred directly related to the Exchange;

Adjustments to eliminate the net currency translation gains and losses on certain intercompany debt;

Adjustments to eliminate the management fee, plus reimbursable expenses, paid by Champion Holdings to its primary investors under a management service agreement; and

Adjustments to reflect tax expense for the unaudited pro forma adjustments


 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

Pro Forma Results of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,405,847

 

 

$

1,297,159

 

Cost of sales

 

 

1,152,772

 

 

 

1,090,349

 

Gross profit

 

 

253,075

 

 

 

206,810

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

272,277

 

 

 

148,475

 

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(19,202

)

 

 

58,335

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

3,175

 

 

 

3,797

 

Other expense

 

 

1,858

 

 

 

94

 

(Loss) income from operations before income taxes

 

 

(24,235

)

 

 

54,444

 

Income tax expense

 

 

19,225

 

 

 

28,789

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(43,460

)

 

$

25,655

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Pro Forma Adjusted EBITDA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(43,460

)

 

$

25,655

 

Income tax expense

 

 

19,225

 

 

 

28,789

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

3,175

 

 

 

3,797

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

17,244

 

 

 

16,065

 

Equity-based compensation (for awards granted prior to December 31, 2018)

 

 

93,132

 

 

 

916

 

Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)

 

 

123

 

 

 

(176

)

Transaction costs

 

 

1,788

 

 

 

 

Acquisition integration costs

 

 

7,966

 

 

 

386

 

Restructuring costs

 

 

1,640

 

 

 

1,132

 

Gain on sale of non-operating facilities

 

 

 

 

 

(2,104

)

Lower of cost or market adjustment of development inventory

 

 

 

 

 

1,165

 

Other

 

 

70

 

 

 

328

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

100,903

 

 

$

75,953

 

As a percent of net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

18.0

%

 

 

15.9

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

19.4

%

 

 

11.4

%

Operating (loss) income

 

 

(1.4

%)

 

 

4.5

%

Net (loss) income

 

 

(3.1

%)

 

 

2.0

%

Adjusted EBITDA

 

 

7.2

%

 

 

5.9

%

Pro Forma Net Sales: Pro forma net sales for fiscal 2019 were $1,405.8 million compared to $1,297.2 million in the prior year, an increase of $108.6 million. The increase was attributable to an increase in number of units sold, and an increase in the average home selling price as a result of product mix and pricing actions to offset the impact of fluctuating material and labor costs and plant operating improvements.

Pro Forma Gross Profit: Pro forma gross profit increased by $46.3 million during fiscal 2019 the compared to the same period of the prior year and improved as a percent of net sales to 18.0% from 15.9%. The increase in gross profit as a percent of net sales is consistent with the synergy capture, operational improvements and product rationalization actions taken by the Company as discussed above. The continued standardization of product design and material purchases has allowed for more efficient production for the Company and its supply chain and helped to mitigate the effects of commodity and labor fluctuations occurring in the market place.

Pro Forma Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses: Pro forma selling, general, and administrative expenses were $272.3 million for fiscal 2019 as compared to $148.5 million for fiscal 2018. The increase was primarily the result of increased non-cash, equity-based compensation expense of $92.2 million, increased sales commissions and incentive compensation of $9.4 million (which is generally based on sales volume or a measure of profitability), and increased costs incurred with the integration of the Skyline operations of $7.6 million.


Pro Forma Interest Expense, Net: Pro forma interest expense, net was $3.2 million for fiscal 2019, a decrease of $0.6 million from the same period of the prior year. The overall decrease was primarily attributable to additional interest income earned from higher average cash balances invested in short-term facilities.

Pro Forma Other Expense: Other expense for fiscal 2019 primarily consisted of expenses for legal, accounting and advisory services attributable to the Exchange and the Offerings.

Pro Forma Income Tax Expense: During fiscal 2019, the Company had pro forma income tax expense of $19.2 million and an effective tax rate of (79.3%), compared to income tax expense of $28.8 million at an effective tax rate of 52.9% during fiscal 2018. Prior to the completion of the Exchange, Skyline recognized no income tax expense or benefit as a result of historical operating loss carryforwards which had a full valuation allowance. A portion of the valuation allowance was reversed upon completion of the Exchange, however, that reversal did not have an impact on the pro forma results of operations. The pro forma income tax effects were a result of the income tax effects of the Company discussed above plus the tax impact of the pro forma adjustments.

BACKLOG

Although orders from customers can be cancelled at any time without penalty, and unfilled orders are not necessarily an indication of future business, the Company’s unfilled U.S. and Canadian manufacturing orders for homes at March 28, 2020 totaled $127.5 million compared to $142.7 million at March 30, 2019. Approximately one-third of the year-over-year decline in backlog is concentrated at the Company’s Canadian operations, which were impacted by softness in the western Canada housing markets. U.S. backlogs are down due to added capacity and increased production rates at certain plants.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table presents summary cash flow information for fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

76,743

 

 

$

65,228

 

 

$

31,623

 

Investing activities

 

 

(14,093

)

 

 

(2,030

)

 

 

(8,621

)

Financing activities

 

 

21,569

 

 

 

(72,518

)

 

 

10,336

 

Effect of exchange rate changes

 

 

(1,398

)

 

 

(662

)

 

 

586

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

82,821

 

 

 

(9,982

)

 

 

33,924

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

 

 

126,634

 

 

 

136,616

 

 

 

102,692

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

 

$

209,455

 

 

$

126,634

 

 

$

136,616

 

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations and existing cash balances. Cash balances and cash flow from operations for the next year are expected to be adequate to cover working capital requirements, fund capital expenditures, and floor plan payment obligations. The Company does not have any scheduled long term debt maturities in the next twelve months. The Company’s revolving credit facility includes a leverage ratio covenant that requires the Company’s first lien debt levels to remain less than 2.75x consolidated trailing twelve month EBITDA. The Company anticipates compliance with its leverage ratio debt covenant and projects its level of cash availability to be in excess of cash needed to operate the business for the next year. In the event operating cash flow and existing cash balances were deemed inadequate to support the Company’s liquidity needs, and one or more capital resources were to become unavailable, the Company would revise operating strategies accordingly.

Cash provided by operating activities was $76.7 million in fiscal 2020 compared to $65.2 million in fiscal 2019. Cash was generated by operating income (before non-cash charges) from higher sales and operating margins compared to the prior year. Additionally, there were no transaction expenses incurred for the Skyline acquisition or secondary offering costs in fiscal 2020 compared to $8.2 million in the same period of the prior year. The increase was partially offset by cash used for other working capital items. Cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2019 increased to $65.2 million from $31.6 million in fiscal 2018. The increase was primarily due to an increase in operating income after adding back non-cash related expenses such as equity-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, which increased due to the Exchange with Skyline and overall operating improvement. The increase was partially offset by costs associated with the integration of the Skyline operations of $8.0 million.


Cash used in investing activities was $14.1 million in fiscal 2020 versus $2.0 million in 2019. The increase is primarily related to the benefit of $9.7 million of cash acquired in the Exchange in fiscal 2019, and an increase in capital expenditures of $3.3 million, partially offset by proceeds of $1.1 million from the disposition of a held for sale property. The expenditures for capital items are part of the Company’s focus on safety and operating efficiency initiatives as well as the expansion of production capacity with the investment in the new Leesville, Louisiana manufacturing facility. Cash used in investing activities was $2.0 million in fiscal 2019 versus $8.6 million in 2018. The $6.6 million decrease was mainly due to the benefit of $9.7 million of cash assumed in the Exchange, offset by an increase in capital expenditures of $2.6 million.  

In fiscal 2020, cash provided by financing activities was $21.6 million, versus the prior year which had net cash used in financing activities of $72.5 million. The increase in cash provided by financing activities is primarily a result of the increase in net borrowings on the credit facility. Additionally, there were no capital distributions, payments of deferred financing fees, or repayments of term loans in fiscal 2020. Cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2019 was mainly related to Champion Holdings members’ capital distribution of $65.2 million, completed in conjunction with the Exchange with Skyline and a paydown on revolving debt of $5.0 million. Cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2018 was primarily the result of increased net borrowings on floor plan payables.

On June 5, 2018, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility of up to $100.0 million, including a letter of credit sub-facility of not less than $45.0 million. Initial borrowings in fiscal 2019 under the Credit Agreement were used to repay the Company’s prior $46.9 million term loans and replace the Company’s prior cash collateralized stand-alone letter of credit facility. The interest rate on borrowing under the Credit Agreement is based on LIBOR and was 2.4% at March 28, 2020. The Company borrowed $38.0 million under the Credit Agreement in March 2020 to maximize financial flexibility in response to the impact of COVID-19. The Company had $6.4 million available to borrow against the Credit Agreement at March 28, 2020.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS

The following table presents a summary of payments due by period for the Company’s contractual obligations for long-term debt and operating leases as of March 28, 2020:

 

 

Payments due by period: After March 28, 2020 (1)(2)

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Total

 

 

<1 Year

 

 

1 to 3

Years

 

 

3 to 5

Years

 

 

>5 Years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility maturing in 2023

 

$

64,900

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

64,900

 

 

$

 

Obligations under industrial revenue bonds due 2029

 

 

12,430

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,430

 

Operating Leases

 

 

17,171

 

 

 

5,411

 

 

 

7,791

 

 

 

2,198

 

 

 

1,771

 

Total

 

$

94,501

 

 

$

5,411

 

 

$

7,791

 

 

$

67,098

 

 

$

14,201

 

(1)

The variable interest on outstanding debt obligations is not included in the repayment information.

(2)

Based on the outstanding debt obligations and variable rates in effect at March 28, 2020, the estimated annual interest expense on the revolving credit facility and industrial revenue bonds would be $2.4 million.

Credit Facility

The Credit Agreement matures on June 5, 2023 and has no scheduled amortization. The interest rate under the Credit Agreement will adjust based on the first lien net leverage of the Company which will range from a high of LIBOR plus 2.25% and ABR plus 1.25% when first lien net leverage is equal to or greater than 2.00:1.00, to a low of LIBOR plus 1.50% and ABR plus 0.50% when first lien net leverage is below 0.50:1.00. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay a commitment fee ranging between 0.25% and 0.40% (depending on first lien net leverage) in respect of unused commitments under the Credit Agreement.

Letter of Credit Facility

The Company has a letter of credit sub-facility under the Credit Agreement. At March 28, 2020, letters of credit issued under the sub-facility totaled $28.7 million.


Industrial Revenue Bonds

Obligations under industrial revenue bonds are supported by letters of credit and bear interest based on a municipal bond index rate. The industrial revenue bonds require lump-sum payments of principal upon maturity in 2029.

Floor Plan Payable

At March 28, 2020, the Company had outstanding borrowings on floor plan financing arrangements of $33.9 million. The Company’s retail operations utilize floor plan financing to fund the acquisition of manufactured homes for display or resale. The arrangements provide for borrowings up to $48.0 million. Borrowings are secured by the homes acquired and are required to be repaid when the Company sells the financed home to a customer.

Contingent Obligations

The Company has contingent liabilities and obligations at March 28, 2020, including surety bonds and letters of credit totaling $23.6 million and $28.7 million, respectively. Additionally, the Company is contingently obligated under repurchase agreements with certain lending institutions that provide floor plan financing to independent retailers. The contingent repurchase obligation as of March 28, 2020 is approximately $152.7 million, without reduction for the resale value of the homes. The impact of COVID-19 may have an adverse impact on the solvency of independent industry retailers and, as a result, the Company may experience higher levels of repurchase commitments if the retailers default under terms of the floor plan financing arrangements. The Company has the ability to resell the repurchased collateral to other retailers, and losses incurred on repurchased homes have been insignificant in recent periods. The reserve for estimated losses under repurchase agreements was $1.0 million at March 28, 2020. See “Critical Accounting Polices – Reserve for Repurchase Commitments” below.

The Company has provided various representations, warranties, and other standard indemnifications in the ordinary course of its business in agreements to acquire and sell business assets and in financing arrangements. The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business.

In the normal course of business, the Company’s subsidiaries historically provided certain parent company guarantees to two U.K. customers. These guarantees provided contractual liability for proven construction defects up to 12 years from the date of delivery of the units. The guarantees remain a contingent liability subsequent to the fiscal 2017 disposition of the U.K. operations, which declines over time through October 2027. As of the date of this report, no claims have been reported under the terms of the guarantees.

Management believes the ultimate liability with respect to these contingent obligations will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES - ADJUSTED EBITDA

The Company defines Adjusted Earnings Before Interest Taxes and Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA ”) as net income or loss plus; (a) the provision for income taxes; (b) interest expense, net; (c) depreciation and amortization; (d) gain or loss from discontinued operations; (e) foreign currency gains and losses; (f) equity based compensation awards granted prior to December 31, 2018; (g) non-cash restructuring charges and impairment of assets; and (h) other non-operating costs including those for the acquisition and integration or disposition of businesses and idle facilities. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of earnings calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income or loss prepared on a U.S. GAAP basis. Adjusted EBITDA does not purport to represent cash flow provided by, or used in, operating activities as defined by U.S. GAAP, which is presented in the Statement of Cash Flows. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a supplemental measure of the Company’s financial performance that management believes is useful to investors, because the excluded items may vary significantly in timing or amounts and/or may obscure trends useful in evaluating and comparing the Company’s operating activities across reporting periods. Management believes Adjusted EBITDA is useful to an investor in evaluating operating performance for the following reasons: (i) Adjusted EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items such as interest income and expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization and equity-based compensation, which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting methods and the book value of assets, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired; and (ii) analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to evaluate the overall operating performance of companies in the industry.


Management uses Adjusted EBITDA for planning purposes, including the preparation of internal annual operating budget and periodic forecasts: (i) in communications with the board of directors and investors concerning financial performance; (ii) as a factor in determining bonuses under management’s annual incentive compensation program; and (iii) as a measure of operating performance used to determine the ability to provide cash flows to support investments in capital assets, acquisitions and working capital requirements for operating expansion.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," to the consolidated financial statements included in this report reflect transactionsReport. Certain of our accounting policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Assumptions and estimates of future earnings and cash flow are used in the dollar valuesperiodic analyses of the recoverability of goodwill, intangible assets, deferred tax assets and property, plant, and equipment. Historical experience and trends are used to estimate reserves, including reserves for self-insured risks, warranty costs, and wholesale repurchase losses. The Company considers an accounting estimate to be critical if it requires us to make assumptions about matters that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made and changes in which they were incurredthe estimate would have had a significant impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company believes that the following discussion addresses the Company’s critical accounting estimates.

Acquisitions

We allocate the purchase price of an acquired business to its identifiable assets and liabilities based on estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated to the assets and liabilities, if any, is recorded as goodwill. We use all available information to estimate fair values. We typically engage outside appraisal firms to assist in the fair value determination of identifiable intangible assets and any other significant assets or liabilities. We adjust the preliminary purchase price allocation, as necessary, up to one year after the acquisition closing date as we obtain more information regarding asset valuations and liabilities assumed. Our estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but that are inherently uncertain, and therefore, domay not attempt to measurebe realized. Unanticipated events or circumstances may occur which could affect the impactaccuracy of inflation. On a long-term basis,our fair value estimates, including assumptions regarding industry economic factors and business strategies. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Corporation has adjusted selling pricesestimates, assumptions, and values reflected in reaction to changing costs due to inflation.the valuations will be realized, and actual results could vary materially.

Forward Looking InformationReserves for Self-Insured Risks

The preceding Management’s DiscussionCompany is self-insured for a significant portion of its general insurance, product liability, workers’ compensation, auto, health, and Analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are also made elsewhere in this report. The Corporation publishes other forward-looking statements from time to time.

Statements that are not historical in nature, includingproperty insurance. Insurance coverage is maintained for catastrophic exposures and those containing words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We cautionrisks required to be awareinsured by law. The Company is liable for the first $150,000 of incurred losses for each workers’ compensation and auto liability claim and is responsible for losses up to the speculative nature of “forward-looking statements.” Although these statements reflect the Corporation’s good faith belief based on current expectations, estimates,first $500,000 per occurrence for general, product liability, and projections about (among other things) the industry and the markets in which the Corporation operates, theyproperty insurance. Generally catastrophic losses are not guarantees of future performance.

Whether actual results will conforminsured up to management’s expectations and predictions$100 million. The health plan is subject to a numberstop-loss limit of known$300,000 per occurrence. Estimated self-insurance costs are accrued for all expected future expenditures for reported and unknown risksunreported claims based on historical experience.

Warranty Reserves

The Company’s factory-built housing operations generally provide each retail homebuyer or builder/developer with a 12-month assurance warranty from the date of retail purchase. Estimated warranty costs are accrued as cost of sales at the time of sale. Warranty provisions and uncertainties,reserves are based on various factors, including the following:

Consumer confidence and economic uncertainty;

Availability of wholesale and retail financing;

The healthestimates of the U.S. housing marketamounts necessary to settle existing and future claims on homes sold as a whole;

Regulations pertainingof the balance sheet date. Factors used in the estimation of the warranty liability include the estimated amount of warranty and customer service costs incurred for homes that remain in retailers’ inventories before delivery to the housingconsumer, homes purchased by consumers still within the warranty period, the timing in which work orders were completed, and park model industries;the historical average costs incurred to service a home.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

It is the Company’s policy to evaluate the recoverability of property, plant, and equipment whenever events and changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable, primarily based on estimated selling price, appraised value, or projected undiscounted future cash flows.


Impairment of Goodwill

The cyclical natureGoodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually. Impairment testing is required more often if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment is more likely than not to have occurred. In conducting its annual impairment testing, the Company may first perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If not, no further goodwill impairment testing is required. If it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, or if the Company elects not to perform a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit, the Company then compares the fair value of the manufactured housing and park model industries;

General or seasonal weather conditions affecting sales;

Potential impact of natural disasters on sales and raw material costs;

Potential periodic inventory adjustments by independent retailers;

Interest rate levels;

Impact of inflation;

Impact of labor costs;

Competitive pressures on pricing and promotional costs;

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — (Continued).

Forward Looking Information — (Continued)

Catastrophic events impacting insurance costs;

The availability of insurance coverage for various risksreporting unit to the Corporation;

Market demographics;related net book value. If the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is measured and

Management’s ability recognized. As the analysis depends upon judgments, estimates and assumptions, such testing is subject to attractinherent uncertainties, which could cause the fair value to fluctuate from period to period.  

In fiscal 2020, the Company performed qualitative assessments of its reporting units. The annual assessment was completed on of the first day of March and retain executive officersan additional assessment was performed the last day of the fiscal year due to a decrease in the Company’s share price and key personnel.in response to the changes in business operating conditions from COVID-19. The assessments indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its respective carrying value. The Company does not believe that any reporting units are at risk for impairment.

Consequently,Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Assets

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial statement amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided when the Company determines that it is more likely than not that some or all of the Corporation’s forward-lookingdeferred tax assets will not be realized.

Reserve for Repurchase Commitments

As is customary in the factory-built housing industry, a significant portion of the manufacturing operations’ sales to independent retailers are made pursuant to repurchase agreements with lending institutions that provide wholesale floor plan financing to the retailers. Certain homes sold pursuant to repurchase agreements are subject to repurchase, generally up to 24 months after the sale of the home to the retailer. Certain other homes sold pursuant to repurchase agreements are subject to repurchase until the home is sold by the retailer. For those homes with an unlimited repurchase period, the Company’s risk of loss upon repurchase declines due to required monthly principal payments by the retailer. After 24 or 30 months from the date of the Company’s sale of the home, the risk of loss on these homes is low, and by the 46th month, most programs require that the home be paid in full, at which time the Company no longer has risk of loss. Pursuant to these agreements, during the repurchase period, generally upon default by the retailer and repossession by the financial institution, the Company is obligated to repurchase the homes from the Floor Plan Lender. The contingent repurchase obligation as of March 28, 2020, is estimated to be approximately $152.7 million, without reduction for the resale value of the homes. Losses under repurchase obligations represent the difference between the repurchase price and net proceeds from the resale of the homes, less accrued rebates, which will not be paid. Losses incurred on homes repurchased have been insignificant in recent periods. The reserve for estimated losses under repurchase agreements was $1.0 million at March 28, 2020.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Off balance sheet arrangements at March 28, 2020 consist of the contingent repurchase obligation totaling approximately $152.7 million, letters of credit totaling $28.7 million, and surety bonds totaling $23.6 million. See “Contractual Obligations and Commitments – Contingent Obligations” and “Critical Accounting Policies – Reserve for Repurchase Commitments” above for more information related to these off balance sheet arrangements.

OTHER MATTERS

Inflation

Inflation has not had a material effect on profitability during the past three years. Commodity prices, including lumber, have fluctuated in recent years, but increases have generally been passed on to customers or mitigated through working with supply chain partners. However, sudden increases in specific costs, as well as price competition, can affect the ability to pass on costs and adversely impact results of operations. Therefore, there is no assurance that inflation or the impact of rising material costs will not have a significant impact on revenue or results of operations in the future.

Seasonality

The housing industry is affected by seasonality, which includes factory-built homes. Sales during the period from March to November are traditionally higher than other months. As a result, quarterly results of a particular period are not necessarily representative of the results expected for the year.


Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Refer to Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding new accounting pronouncements.


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

Debt obligations under the Credit Agreement are subject to variable rates of interest based on LIBOR, the administrative agent’s prime rate or the U.S. federal funds rate. A 100 basis point increase in the underlying interest rate would result in an additional annual interest expense of approximately $0.6 million, assuming related debt of $64.9 million, which is the amount of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement at March 28, 2020.

Obligations under industrial revenue bonds are subject to variable rates of interest based on a municipal bond index rate. A 100 basis point increase in the underlying interest rates would result in additional annual interest expense of approximately $0.1 million, assuming related debt of $12.4 million, which is the amount of outstanding borrowings on industrial revenue bonds at March 28, 2020.

Obligations under floor plan financing arrangements are subject to variable rates of interest based on terms negotiated with the floor plan lenders. A 100 basis point increase in the underlying interest rates would result in additional annual interest expense of approximately $0.3 million, assuming related floor plan borrowings of $33.9 million, which is the amount of outstanding borrowings on floor plan financing at March 28, 2020.

The Company’s approach to interest rate risk is to balance borrowings between fixed rate and variable rate debt as management deems appropriate. At March 28, 2020, the Company’s borrowings under the Credit Agreement, industrial revenue bonds and floor plan financing arrangements are all at variable rates.

Foreign Exchange Risk

The Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk with its factory-built housing operations in Canada. The Canadian operations had fiscal 2020 net sales of $111.8 million Canadian dollars. Assuming future annual Canadian net sales equivalent to fiscal 2020, a change of 1.0% in exchange rates between the U.S. and Canadian dollars would change consolidated sales by $1.1 million. The Company also has foreign exchange risk for cash balances maintained in Canadian dollars that are subject to fluctuating values when exchanged into U.S. dollars. The Company does not financially hedge its investment in the Canadian operations or in Canadian denominated bank deposits.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Financial statements and supplementary data are qualifiedfiled herewith under Item 15.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of March 28, 2020. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 28, 2020.


(b)

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. As part of the integration of certain business and corporate activities from the Exchange, the Company instituted changes to systems and processes to expand controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that an effective internal control environment was maintained across the organization. Changes included such activities as implementing additional processes, automating manual processes, standardizing controls, and increasing monitoring controls. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by these cautionary statements. The Corporationthe Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of March 28, 2020.

Given their inherent limitations, the Company's controls and procedures may not realizeprevent or detect misstatements. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the results anticipatedobjectives of the controls system are met. In light of the inherent limitations in all controls systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

(c)

Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in this Annual Report and issued an attestation report regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 28, 2020, and the attestation report is set forth in Item 15, "Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," under the caption "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting" and is incorporated herein by managementreference.

(d)

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than as described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 28, 2020 that have materially affected, or even ifare reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation substantially realizes the results management anticipates, the results may not have the consequences to, or effects on, the Corporation or its business or operations that management expects. Such differences may be material. Except asCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by applicable laws,this item concerning the Corporation doesCompany’s directors, director nominees and Section 16 beneficial ownership reporting compliance will be set forth in the definitive Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2020 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year, under the captions "Election of Directors," "Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners," "Executive Officers" and "Corporate Governance” and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Company has adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics (“Code of Conduct”), which applies to all of its directors, officers, and employees. Our Code of Conduct is available on our website, www.skylinechampion.com, and can be obtained by writing to Investor Relations at 755 West Big Beaver Rd., Suite 1000, Troy, MI 48084, or by sending an email to investorrelations@championhomes.com. The information contained on our website is not intend to publish updatesincorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item will be set forth in the 2020 Proxy Statement under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “How We Make Compensation Decisions,” “What We Pay and Why: Elements of Compensation,” “Compensation Tables,” “Summary Compensation Table for 2020,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2020,” “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2020 Year End,” “Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2020,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or revisionsChange in Control,” “Director Compensation,” “Director Compensation Program,” “Non-Employee Director Compensation in Fiscal 2020,” “CEO Pay Ratio,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” and “Compensation Committee Report,” and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item will be set forth in the 2020 Proxy Statement under the caption " Share Ownership of any forward-looking statements management makes to reflect newCertain Beneficial Owners " and is incorporated herein by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information future events or otherwise.about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of March 28, 2020:

 

Plan Category

 

Number of Securities to be

Issued Upon Exercise of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights (1)

(A)

 

Weighted-Average

Exercise

Price of Outstanding

Options,

Warrants and Rights (2)

(B)

 

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

Future Issuance Under

Equity Compensation Plans

(Excluding Securities

Reflected

in Column (A))

(C)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by

   Stockholders

 

827,185

 

$

26.29

 

4,740,835

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by

   Stockholders

 

 

 

 

Total

 

827,185

 

$

26.29

 

4,740,835

 

Item 7A.

(1)

Quantitative

This amount represents the following: (a) 403,086 shares subject to the vesting and/or exercise of outstanding options; (b) 229,790 shares subject to vesting of outstanding performance-based restricted stock units; and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.(c) 194,309 shares subject to vesting of outstanding restricted stock units. The options, performance-based restricted stock units and restricted stock units were all granted under our 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted shares outstanding under our equity plans have already been reflected in our total outstanding common stock balance.

Not applicable.

Item 8.

(2)

The weighted-average exercise price is calculated solely on the exercise prices of the outstanding options and does not reflect the shares that will be issued upon the vesting of outstanding awards of performance-based restricted stock units and time-based restricted stock units, which have no exercise price.



The information required by this item will be set forth in the 2020 Proxy Statement under the captions “Proposal One: Election of Directors,” “Board Composition and Director Independence,” “Meetings and Committees,” “Corporate Governance Overview,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” and “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions,” and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item will be set forth in the 2020 Proxy Statement under the captions “Auditor Fees and Pre-Approval Policy,” “Auditor Fees and Services,” and “Pre-Approval of Auditor Fees and Services,” and is incorporated herein by reference.


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this Annual Report.

Financial Statement Schedules:

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other financial statement schedules are omitted because such schedules are not required, or the information required has been presented in the aforementioned financial statements.

Exhibits

The documents listed below are being filed or have previously been filed on behalf of the Company and are incorporated herein by reference from the documents indicated and made a part hereof. Exhibits not identified as previously filed are filed herewith.

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

2.1

Share Contribution & Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2018, by and among Skyline Corporation and Champion Enterprises Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the registrant’s Form 8-K, filed on January 5, 2018).

3.1

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Skyline Champion Corporation, dated June 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 6, 2018).

3.2

Amended and Restated By-Laws of Skyline Champion Corporation, dated June 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 6, 2018).

4.1

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2018 by and among Skyline Champion Corporation, The Bain Shareholder, Sankaty Champion Holdings, LLC, Sankaty Credit Opportunities IV, L.P. CCP Champion Investors, LLC, Centerbridge Capital Partners, L.P., Centerbridge Capital Partners Strategic, L.P., Centerbridge Capital Partners SBS, L.P., Mak Champion Investment LLC, Mak-ro Capital Master Fund L.P. and Arthur J. Decio (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 6, 2018).

4.2

Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2018, by and among Skyline Champion Corporation, Champion Enterprises Holdings, LLC, Sankaty Champion Holdings, LLC, Sankaty Credit Opportunities IV, L.P., Centerbridge Capital Partners, L.P., Centerbridge Capital Partners Strategic, L.P., Centerbridge Capital Partners SBS, L.P., CCP Champion Investors, LLC, MAK Champion Investment LLC and MAK-RO Capital Master Fund. L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 6, 2018).

4.3

Description of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to the registrant’s registration statement on Form 8-A12B filed by the Company on May 31, 2018).

10.1

Credit Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2018 by and among Skyline Champion Corporation, Citizens Bank N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the other financial institutions party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 6, 2018)

10.2

Transition Services Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2018, by and among Skyline Champion Corporation and Champion Enterprises Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the registrant’s Form 8-K dated June 6, 2018)

10.3

2018 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the registrants registration statement on Form S-8 filed on September 26, 2018).†

10.4

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement for Employees.*†

10.5

Form of Performance Stock Unit Agreement.*†

10.6

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors.*†

10.7

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees.*†

10.8

Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the registrant’s Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2018).

10.9

Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement for Executives.*†

10.10

Form of Performance Stock Unit Agreement for Executives.*†

10.11

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Executives.*†

10.12

Executive Employment Agreement, dated September 5, 2019 and effective June 1, 2019, between Mark Yost and Champion Home Builders, Inc.*†

10.13

Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2018, between Laurie Hough and Champion Home Builders, Inc. *†

10.14

Executive Employment Agreement effective June 17, 2019 between Robert Spence and Champion Home Builders, Inc.*†

10.15

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2018, between Keith Anderson and Champion Home Builders, Inc.*†

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant. *

23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. *

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).*

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).*

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document*

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*

*

Filed herewith.

Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

ITEM 16.  FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not applicable


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SKYLINE CHAMPION CORPORATION

Date:

May 21, 2020

/s/ Mark Yost

Mark Yost


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ Mark Yost

President and Chief Executive Officer

May 21, 2020

Mark Yost

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Laurie Hough

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer

May 21, 2020

Laurie Hough

(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Timothy Burkhardt

Vice President and Controller

May 21, 2020

Timothy Burkhardt

(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Keith Anderson

Director

Keith Anderson

May 21, 2020

/s/ Michael Berman

Director

Michael Berman

May 21, 2020

/s/ Timothy Bernlohr

Director

Timothy Bernlohr

May 21, 2020

/s/ Eddie Capel

Director

Eddie Capel

May 21, 2020

/s/ John C. Firth

Director

John C. Firth

May 21, 2020

/s/ Michael Kaufman

Director

Michael Kaufman

May 21, 2020

/s/ Erin Mulligan Nelson

Director

Erin Mulligan Nelson

May 21, 2020

/s/ Gary E. Robinette

Director

Gary E. Robinette

May 21, 2020


SKYLINE CHAMPION CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reports of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Fiscal Years Ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018

F-7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years Ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018

F-8

Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Fiscal Years Ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018

F-9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-10

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

F-34



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

23

Consolidated Balance Sheets

25

Consolidated Income Statements

27

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

28

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

29

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

30

All other supplementary data is omitted because it is not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

Skyline Champion Corporation

Elkhart, Indiana

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Skyline Champion Corporation and subsidiary companies (the “Corporation”)Company) as of May 31, 2017March 28, 2020 and 2016,March 30, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the fiscal years then ended. ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the fiscal years ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 28, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated May 21, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts and disclosures to which it relates.

Workers’ Compensation Reserve

Description of the Matter

The Company had workers’ compensation reserves of $20.5 million as of March 28, 2020. As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is self-insured for a significant portion of its workers’ compensation obligations. Workers’ compensation costs are accrued for incurred claims and estimated claims incurred but not yet reported.

Auditing the Company’s workers’ compensation reserve is complex and required the involvement of actuarial specialists due to the measurement uncertainty associated with the estimate of the ultimate loss projection and the use of various actuarial methods.


How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over the workers’ compensation reserve process. For example, we tested controls over management’s review of the workers’ compensation reserve calculations, the appropriateness of the assumptions management used in the calculation and controls pertaining to the completeness and accuracy of the claim data underlying the reserve.

To evaluate the reserve for workers’ compensation, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of the incurred claims underlying the reserve, obtaining legal confirmation letters to evaluate reserves in consideration of litigated matters, and reviewing the Company’s reinsurance contracts to assess the Company’s self-insurance retentions. Furthermore, we involved our actuarial specialists to assist in our evaluation of methodologies and assumptions applied by management to establish the workers’ compensation reserve. We compared the Company’s reserve to a range developed by our actuarial specialists based on assumptions independently developed by our specialists.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2006.

Detroit, Michigan

May 21, 2020



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

Skyline Champion Corporation

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Skyline Champion Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2017,March 28, 2020, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control – Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee onof Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)(2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Skyline Champion Corporation (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 28, 2020, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company  as of March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, equity and cash flows for each of the fiscal years ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a) and our report dated May 21, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Corporation’sCompany’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying “Management’sManagement’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting”.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Corporation’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also includedrisk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s report. The Corporation’s internal controls over the accuracy and valuation of raw materials inventories did not operate with sufficient precision to prevent or detect the potential occurrence of a material misstatement in compiling the raw material inventory listing from the physical inventory counts or in the valuation of raw materials at cost under the first-in, first-out method. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2017 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Corporation as of May 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its

cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, because of the material weakness described above, the Corporation has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2017, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Crowe Horwath/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

South Bend, Indiana

August 11, 2017

Detroit, Michigan

May 21, 2020


Skyline Champion Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Consolidated Balance Sheets

May 31, 2017(Dollars and 2016shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

209,455

 

 

$

126,634

 

Trade accounts receivable, net

 

 

45,733

 

 

 

57,649

 

Inventories, net

 

 

126,386

 

 

 

122,638

 

Other current assets

 

 

17,239

 

 

 

11,369

 

Total current assets

 

 

398,813

 

 

 

318,290

 

Long-term assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

 

109,291

 

 

 

108,587

 

Goodwill

 

 

173,521

 

 

 

173,406

 

Amortizable intangible assets, net

 

 

43,357

 

 

 

48,936

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

21,812

 

 

 

34,058

 

Other noncurrent assets

 

 

34,906

 

 

 

16,677

 

Total assets

 

$

781,700

 

 

$

699,954

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Floor plan payable

 

$

33,914

 

 

$

33,321

 

Accounts payable

 

 

38,703

 

 

 

43,421

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

114,030

 

 

 

129,561

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

186,647

 

 

 

206,303

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

77,330

 

 

 

54,330

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

3,264

 

 

 

3,422

 

Other

 

 

40,144

 

 

 

23,927

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

120,738

 

 

 

81,679

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.0277 par value, 115,000 shares authorized, 56,665 and 56,657 shares issued (including 145 and 290 shares subject to restriction) as of March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, respectively

 

 

1,570

 

 

 

1,569

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

485,552

 

 

 

479,226

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(48

)

 

 

(58,208

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(12,759

)

 

 

(10,615

)

Total equity

 

 

474,315

 

 

 

411,972

 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 

$

781,700

 

 

$

699,954

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Skyline Champion Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,369,730

 

 

$

1,360,043

 

 

$

1,064,722

 

Cost of sales

 

 

1,090,755

 

 

 

1,114,684

 

 

 

887,611

 

Gross profit

 

 

278,975

 

 

 

245,359

 

 

 

177,111

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses

 

 

186,855

 

 

 

270,158

 

 

 

122,582

 

Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)

 

 

235

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

(547

)

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

5,430

 

 

 

4,820

 

 

 

487

 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

86,455

 

 

 

(29,742

)

 

 

54,589

 

Interest expense

 

 

4,632

 

 

 

5,333

 

 

 

5,133

 

Interest income

 

 

(3,231

)

 

 

(2,043

)

 

 

(948

)

Other expense

 

 

 

 

 

8,271

 

 

 

7,288

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

85,054

 

 

 

(41,303

)

 

 

43,116

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

26,894

 

 

 

16,905

 

 

 

27,316

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

58,160

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

15,800

 

Net income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.03

 

 

$

(1.09

)

 

$

0.33

 

Diluted

 

$

1.02

 

 

$

(1.09

)

 

$

0.33

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Skyline Champion Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

   2017   2016 
ASSETS    

Current Assets:

    

Cash

  $11,384   $7,659 

Accounts receivable

   12,751    15,153 

Inventories

   12,233    11,381 

Workers’ compensation security deposit

   371    1,294 

Other current assets

   563    331 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

   37,302    35,818 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Property, Plant and Equipment, at Cost:

    

Land

   2,965    2,996 

Buildings and improvements

   35,368    36,624 

Machinery and equipment

   16,364    16,977 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   54,697    56,597 

Less accumulated depreciation

   43,721    44,952 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   10,976    11,645 

Other Assets

   7,366    7,515 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Assets

  $55,644   $54,978 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

58,160

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

15,800

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

(2,144

)

 

 

(1,322

)

 

 

854

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

56,016

 

 

$

(59,530

)

 

$

16,654

 

 

TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Consolidated Balance Sheets — (Continued)

May 31, 2017 and 2016

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

   2017   2016 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   

Current Liabilities:

    

Accounts payable, trade

  $3,861   $3,921 

Accrued salaries and wages

   3,530    3,557 

Accrued marketing programs

   1,986    1,767 

Accrued warranty

   4,757    4,817 

Customer deposits

   1,880    1,521 

Other accrued liabilities

   2,371    2,448 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

   18,385    18,031 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Long-Term Liabilities:

    

Deferred compensation expense

   4,848    5,002 

Accrued warranty

   2,800    2,500 

Life insurance loans

   4,312    4,312 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Long-Term Liabilities

   11,960    11,814 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies — See Note 10

    

Shareholders’ Equity:

    
    

Common stock, $.0277 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued 11,217,144 shares

   312    312 

Additional paid-in capital

   5,171    5,010 

Retained earnings

   85,560    85,555 

Treasury stock, at cost, 2,825,900 shares

   (65,744   (65,744
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Shareholders’ Equity

   25,299    25,133 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

  $55,644   $54,978 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Consolidated Income Statements

For the Years Ended May 31, 2017 and 2016

(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

   2017   2016 

OPERATIONS

    

Net sales

  $236,504   $211,774 

Cost of sales

   214,527    188,461 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

   21,977    23,313 

Selling and administrative expenses

   22,908    21,120 

Net gain on sale of property, plant and equipment

   1,280     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

   349    2,193 

Interest expense

   (344   (320
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

   5    1,873 

Income tax expense

        
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

   5    1,873 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

       (195
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  $5   $1,678 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and diluted income per share

  $.00   $.20 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and diluted income share from continuing operations

  $.00   $.22 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and diluted income (loss) per share from discontinued operations

  $.00   $(.02
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

    
    

Basic

   8,391,244    8,391,244 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   8,512,374    8,391,244 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended

May 31, 2017 and 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

   Common
stock
   Additional
paid in  capital
   Retained
earnings
   Treasury
stock
   Total 

Balance, June 1, 2015

  $ 312   $ 4,928   $83,877   $(65,744  $23,373 

Net income

           1,678        1,678 

Share-based compensation

       82            82 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, May 31, 2016

  $312   $5,010   $85,555   $(65,744  $25,133 

Net income

           5        5 

Share-based compensation

       161            161 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, May 31, 2017

  $312   $5,171   $85,560   $(65,744  $25,299 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of theNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Skyline Champion Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended May 31, 2017 and 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

58,160

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

15,800

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

18,546

 

 

 

16,079

 

 

 

8,260

 

Equity-based compensation

 

 

8,349

 

 

 

101,999

 

 

 

642

 

Deferred taxes

 

 

11,796

 

 

 

3,047

 

 

 

12,914

 

Amortization of deferred financing fees

 

 

510

 

 

 

542

 

 

 

 

Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant, and equipment

 

 

239

 

 

 

(37

)

 

 

(122

)

Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)

 

 

235

 

 

 

123

 

 

 

(547

)

Fair market value adjustment to held for sale property

 

 

986

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant, and equipment impairment charge

 

 

550

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write down of development inventory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,165

 

Change in assets and liabilities, net of business acquired:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

11,901

 

 

 

(2,223

)

 

 

(13,904

)

Inventories

 

 

(4,491

)

 

 

(6,044

)

 

 

(24,807

)

Floor plan receivables

 

 

(17

)

 

 

157

 

 

 

3,386

 

Other assets

 

 

(10,599

)

 

 

(2,130

)

 

 

(7,133

)

Accounts payable

 

 

(4,606

)

 

 

(3,105

)

 

 

7,691

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

 

(14,816

)

 

 

15,147

 

 

 

28,122

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

(119

)

 

 

156

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

76,743

 

 

 

65,228

 

 

 

31,623

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant, and equipment

 

 

(15,389

)

 

 

(12,092

)

 

 

(9,442

)

Cash acquired in business acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

9,722

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from disposal of property, plant, and equipment

 

 

196

 

 

 

56

 

 

 

551

 

Proceeds from sale of held for sale property

 

 

1,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease (increase) in note receivable

 

 

 

 

 

284

 

 

 

(167

)

Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

437

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(14,093

)

 

 

(2,030

)

 

 

(8,621

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in floor plan financing, net

 

 

592

 

 

 

3,496

 

 

 

12,011

 

Borrowings on revolving debt facility

 

 

38,000

 

 

 

46,900

 

 

 

 

Payments on revolving debt facility

 

 

(15,000

)

 

 

(5,000

)

 

 

 

Payments on term-loans and other debt

 

 

 

 

 

(46,900

)

 

 

(418

)

Payments for deferred financing fees

 

 

 

 

 

(2,169

)

 

 

(369

)

Members' capital distribution

 

 

 

 

 

(65,277

)

 

 

(888

)

Stock option exercises

 

 

112

 

 

 

1,615

 

 

 

 

Tax payments for equity-based compensation

 

 

(2,135

)

 

 

(5,183

)

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

21,569

 

 

 

(72,518

)

 

 

10,336

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

(1,398

)

 

 

(662

)

 

 

586

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

 

82,821

 

 

 

(9,982

)

 

 

33,924

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period

 

 

126,634

 

 

 

136,616

 

 

 

102,692

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

 

$

209,455

 

 

$

126,634

 

 

$

136,616

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

4,044

 

 

$

4,975

 

 

$

5,000

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

$

22,312

 

 

$

13,537

 

 

$

13,025

 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Skyline Champion Corporation

Consolidated Statement of Equity

(Dollars and shares in thousands)

 

   2017   2016 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

    

Net income

  $5   $1,678 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:

    

Depreciation

   1,026    1,057 

Amortization of debt financing costs

   103    82 

Share-based compensation

   161    82 

Bad debt recoveries

       (250

Net gain on sale of property, plant and equipment

   (1,280    

Change in assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

   2,402    385 

Inventories

   (852   (2,262

Workers’ compensation security deposit

   923    438 

Other current assets

   (232   116 

Accounts payable, trade

   (60   888 

Accrued liabilities

   414    2,026 

Other, net

   258    (387
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash from operating activities

   2,868    3,853 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

    

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

   2,212     

Purchase of property, plant and equipment

   (1,355   (1,132

Other, net

       (57
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash from investing activities

   857    (1,189
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in cash

   3,725    2,664 

Cash at beginning of year

   7,659    4,995 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash at end of year

  $11,384   $7,659 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Members' Contributed Capital

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Additional Paid in Capital

 

 

Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

 

Total

 

Balance at April 1, 2017

 

$

140,322

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

6,714

 

 

$

(10,147

)

 

$

136,889

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,800

 

Equity-based compensation

 

 

642

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

642

 

Members' capital distributions

 

 

(888

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(888

)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

854

 

 

 

854

 

Balance at March 31, 2018

 

$

140,076

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

22,514

 

 

$

(9,293

)

 

$

153,297

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(58,208

)

 

 

 

 

 

(58,208

)

Equity-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101,999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101,999

 

Members' capital distributions

 

 

(42,763

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(22,514

)

 

 

 

 

 

(65,277

)

Exchange of membership interest for shares of Skyline Champion Corporation

 

 

(97,313

)

 

 

56,143

 

 

 

1,555

 

 

 

380,810

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

285,052

 

Net common stock issued under equity-based compensation plans

 

 

 

 

 

514

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

(3,582

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,568

)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

(1,322

)

 

 

(1,323

)

Balance at March 30, 2019

 

$

 

 

 

56,657

 

 

$

1,569

 

 

$

479,226

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

(10,615

)

 

$

411,972

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,160

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,160

 

Equity-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,349

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,349

 

Net common stock issued under equity-based compensation plans

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(2,023

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,022

)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,144

)

 

 

(2,144

)

Balance at March 28, 2020

 

$

 

 

 

56,665

 

 

$

1,570

 

 

$

485,552

 

 

$

(48

)

 

$

(12,759

)

 

$

474,315

 

Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018 consisted solely of foreign currency translation adjustments.

 

TheSee accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Skyline Champion Corporation

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1

1.

Nature

Summary of Operations,Significant Accounting Policies of Consolidated Financial Statements

Basis of Presentation: On June 1, 2018, Skyline Champion Corporation (formerly known as Skyline Corporation), an Indiana corporation (the “Company”) and Champion Enterprises Holdings, LLC (“Champion Holdings”) completed the transactions contemplated by the Share Contribution & Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), dated as of January 5, 2018, by and between the Company and Champion Holdings. Under the Exchange Agreement: (i) Champion Holdings contributed to the Company all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of each of Champion Holdings’ wholly-owned operating subsidiaries (the “Contributed Shares”); and (ii) in exchange for the Contributed Shares, the Company issued to the members of Champion Holdings, in the aggregate, 47,752,008 shares of the Company common stock (“Skyline Common Stock”) (such issuance, the “Shares Issuance”). Immediately following the Shares Issuance, the members of Champion Holdings collectively held 84.5%, and the Company’s pre-closing shareholders collectively held 15.5%, of the issued and outstanding Skyline Common Stock on a fully-diluted basis. The contribution of the Contributed Shares by Champion Holdings to Skyline, and the Shares Issuance by the Company to the members of Champion Holdings are collectively referred to herein as the “Exchange.”

The Exchange was treated as a purchase of the Company by Champion Holdings for accounting and financial reporting purposes. As a result, the financial results for the twelve months ending March 30, 2019 are comprised of: (i) the results of Champion Holdings for the period between April 1, 2018 and May 31, 2018; and (ii) the Company, after giving effect to the Exchange, from June 1, 2018 through March 30, 2019. All annual periods presented prior to the effective date of the Exchange are comprised solely of the results of Champion Holdings and all annual periods presented subsequent to the period ending March 30, 2019 are comprised solely of the results of the Company.

All Company earnings per share and common stock outstanding amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been calculated as if the Shares Issuance took place on April 2, 2017, at the exchange ratio, as defined in the Exchange Agreement.

Nature of Operations: The Company’s operations Skyline Corporation’s core ongoing business activities consistsconsist of designing, producingmanufacturing, retail and marketing manufactured housing, modular housing and park models to independent dealers and manufactured housing communitiestransportation activities. At March 28, 2020, the Company operated 33 manufacturing facilities throughout the United States (“U.S.”) and Canada. Manufactured housing represents homes built according5 manufacturing facilities in western Canada that primarily construct factory-built, timber-framed manufactured and modular houses that are sold primarily to a national code, modular housing represents homes builtindependent retailers, builders/developers, and manufactured home community operators. The Company’s retail operations consist of 21 sales centers that sell manufactured houses to a local code,consumers primarily in the Southern U.S. The Company’s transportation business engages independent owners/drivers to transport recreational vehicles throughout the U.S. and park models are built to specifications established by the American National Standards Institute. These dealersCanada and communities often utilize floor plan financing arrangements with lending institutions. The Corporation’s net sales are predominately from its housing products.

Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement describes the recreational vehicle segment that was soldmanufactured houses in fiscal 2015. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements (including footnote disclosures unless otherwise indicated) reflect these operations as discontinued operations apart from the Corporation’s continuing housing operations.

The following is a summarycertain regions of the accounting policies that have a significant effect onU.S. The Company also has holding companies located in the consolidated financial statements.Netherlands.

BasisPrinciples of presentation —Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Skyline Corporationthe Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and its wholly-ownedmajority-owned subsidiaries of Skyline Homes, Inc., Homette Corporation and Layton Homes Corp. (the “Corporation”).which it controls. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain prior amounts relatedeliminated in consolidation.

Variable Interest Entities and Joint Ventures: The Company analyzes its investments in non-wholly owned subsidiaries to deferred tax assets have been reclassifieddetermine whether they are unconsolidated joint ventures, consolidated joint ventures, or variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary in accordance with ASC 810, Consolidation.

The Company has a 90% equity interest in a consolidated joint venture that was formed in March 2012 to conformacquire and develop land into a subdivision of modular homes to current period presentation.be sold to homebuyers. The Company is responsible for the development of the subdivision and marketing the lots for sale, and to provide, install, and set up modular homes on the lots. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $1.2 million during fiscal 2018 to reflect the net realizable value of development inventory. The net investment in development inventory was 0 for all periods presented.

Accounting Estimates —Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principlesU.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported amountsin the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto. Estimates made in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, business combinations, reserves for obsolete inventory, accrued warranty costs, useful lives of fixed and intangible assets, asset impairment analyses, insurance reserves, legal reserves, repurchase reserves, share-based compensation and liabilitiesdeferred tax valuation allowances. There is significant uncertainty regarding the extent and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dateduration of the financial statements, as well asimpact that the reported amountsCOVID-19 pandemic will have on the demand for our products and our supply chain. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including new information that may emerge


concerning the severity of revenueCOVID-19 and expenses during the reporting period.actions taken to contain it or treat its impacts. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Key estimates, wouldmaking it reasonably possible that a change in these estimates could occur within one year.

Fiscal Year: The Company’s fiscal year is a 52- or 53-week period that ends on the Saturday nearest March 31. Fiscal 2020, 2019 and 2018 include accruals for warrantythe 52-weeks ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and marketing programs as well as valuations for long-lived assetsMarch 31, 2018, respectively.

Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recognized when performance obligations under the terms of a contract are satisfied which generally occurs at a point in time through the transfer of control of promised goods to the Company's customers. Control transfers once a customer has the ability to direct the use of, and deferred tax assets.

Revenue recognition — Substantiallyobtain substantially all of the Corporation’s productsbenefits from, the product. This includes the transfer of legal title, physical possession, the risks and rewards of ownership, and customer acceptance.  Sales revenue is reported net of applicable sales tax. See Note 10, Revenue Recognition, for additional information.

Cost of Sales: Cost of sales includes manufacturing costs such as: (i) materials; (ii) compensation and employee benefits for direct and indirect labor; (iii) fixed and variable manufacturing overhead costs; (iv) warranty costs; (v) inbound delivery costs; and (vi) depreciation of buildings and equipment. Manufacturing overhead costs include costs such as: (i) utilities; (ii) workers’ compensation and product liability self-insurance; (iii) real and personal property taxes on buildings and equipment; (iv) manufacturing supplies; (v) repairs and maintenance; and (vi) rents and leases for buildings and equipment. Cost of sales also includes certain post-manufacturing costs, to the extent such costs are madethe Company’s responsibility. Post-manufacturing costs may include delivery and setup, foundations, craning, roofing, exterior cladding, interior finishing, utility connections and other miscellaneous site costs. Generally, subcontractors are engaged to order.perform post-manufacturing activities.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses: Selling, general, and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) include costs such as (i) salaries, wages, incentives and employee benefits for executive, management, sales, engineering, accounting, information technology (“IT”) and administrative employees; (ii) sales commissions; (iii) marketing and advertising costs; (iv) legal and professional fees; (v) depreciation, rents and leases for administrative facilities, office equipment, IT equipment and computer software; and (vi) postage, office supplies, travel and telephone expenses.

Advertising Costs and Delivery Costs and Revenue: Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses. Total advertising expense was approximately $2.3 million, $1.5 million, and $1.0 million for fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Delivery costs are included in cost of sales and delivery revenue is recognized upon completionincluded in net sales.

Foreign Currency: The Company had intercompany loans between its U.S. and foreign subsidiaries for financing purposes. The foreign exchange impact on these transactions was reported in the consolidated statements of operations under foreign currency transaction gains and losses.

Translation adjustments of the following: an orderCompany’s international subsidiaries for a unitwhich the local currency is received from a dealer or community (customer); written or verbal approval for payment is received from a customer’s financial institution or payment is received; a common carrier signs documentation accepting responsibility for the unit as agent forfunctional currency are reflected in the customer; and the unit is removed from the Corporation’s premises for delivery to a customer. Freight billed to customers is considered sales revenue, and the related freight costs are cost of sales. Volume based rebates paid to dealers are classifiedaccompanying consolidated balance sheets as a reductioncomponent of sales revenue. Salesaccumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

Fair Value: The Company estimatesthe fairvalue of parts are classified as revenue.itsfinancialinstrumentsin accordancewith ASC820,Fair Value Measurement, which establishesa fairvalue hierarchyand requiresan entityto maximizethe use of observable inputsand minimizethe use of unobservableinputswhenmeasuringfairvalue. Assuch, the fairvalue of financialinstrumentsis estimatedusing availablemarketinformationand othervaluationmethods.

Accounts Receivable — Trade receivables are The Company groups assetsand liabilitiesat fairvalue in threelevels,based on the amounts billedinputs and assumptionsused to dealersdeterminefairvalue. These levelsare:

Level 1—Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

Level 2—Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, generally either quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices in markets that are not active.

Level 3—Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, such as pricing models, discounted cash flows, or similar techniques.  

The Company records accounts receivable, accounts payable and communities.other current liabilities at cost. The Corporation does not accrue interest carrying value of these instruments approximate their fair value due to their short-term maturities.


Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments that have original maturities less than 90 days at the time of their purchase. These investments are carried at cost, which approximates market value because of their short maturities.

Restricted Cash: Restricted cash primarily represented collateral for letters of credit issued to support industrial revenue bonds, repurchase obligations, self-insurance programs and bonding facilities prior to the Exchange.

Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: The Company extendscredittermson any a customer-by-customerbasisin the normalcourseof itsbusiness and,as such, trade receivables, nor does it have anaccountsreceivableare subjectto customarycreditrisk.The allowance for doubtful accounts represents the Company's best estimate of probable credit losses due to favorable collections experience. If a loss occurs,in accounts receivable. Receivables are written off against the Corporation’s policy is to recognize it inallowance when management believes that the period when collectability cannotamount receivable will not be reasonably assured. Deposits from customers are classified as current liabilities.recovered. At March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, the Company had an allowancefor doubtfulaccountsof $0.4 millionand $0.6 million, respectively.

Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost isvalue, with cost determined under the first-in, first-out method. Physical inventory countsCapitalized manufacturing costs include the cost of materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. Retail inventories of new manufactured homes built by the Company are takenvalued at the end of each reporting quarter.manufacturing cost, including materials, labor and manufacturing overhead, or net purchase price if acquired from unaffiliated third parties.

Workers’ Compensation Security Deposit — Workers’ compensation security deposit represents funds placed with the Corporation’s worker’s compensation insurance carrier to offset future medical net claims and benefits.

Property, Plant, and Equipment: Property, plant, and equipment are stated at acquisition date cost. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets usingprovided principally on the straight-line method, generally over the following estimated useful lives: land improvements—3 to 10 years; buildings and improvements—8 to 25 years; and vehicles and machinery and equipment—3 to 8 years. Depreciation expense was $13.1 million, $11.3 million, and $7.8 million for financial statement

fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.

Skyline CorporationAt March 28, 2020, the Company owned 5 idle manufacturing facilities and Subsidiary Companies2 idle retail sales centers with a net book value of $8.5 million. These properties are accounted for as long-lived assets to be held and used.

NotesIt is the Company’s policy to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 1.Nature of Operations, Accounting Policies of Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Property, Plant and Equipment — (Continued)

reporting and accelerated methods for income tax reporting purposes. Estimated useful lives for significant classesevaluate the recoverability of property, plant, and equipment are as follows: Buildingwhenever events and improvements 10 to 30 years; machinery and equipment 5 to 8 years.

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever eventschanges in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an assetassets may not be recoverablerecoverable. If impairment indicators exist, the Company performs the required impairment analysis by comparing the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated from projected future cash flows.the long-lived assets to the related net book values. If the carryingnet book value of a long-lived asset is impaired,exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment chargeloss is recorded formeasured and recognized. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by whichdifference between the carryingnet book value and the fair value of the long-lived assets. Fair value is estimated based upon a combination of market and cost approaches, as appropriate. An impairment loss of $0.6 million was recorded in selling, general, and administrative expenses in fiscal 2020 related to a decrease in the estimated fair value of the Company’s idle manufacturing facilities. NaN impairment losses were recorded in fiscal 2019 or 2018.

Assets held for sale: Long-lived assets expected to be sold or otherwise disposed of within one year are classified as assets held for sale and included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. In connection with the Exchange, the Company acquired an office building which was classified as an asset held for sale as of March 30, 2019, valued at $2.1 million. In the first quarter of fiscal 2020, a loss of $1.0 million was recorded in selling, general, and administrative expenses to recognize a decrease in the fair value of the building, which was sold for $1.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2020.

Goodwill: The Company tests goodwill for impairment in accordance with ASC 350. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment on at least an annual basis. Impairment testing is required more often than annually if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment is more likely than not to have occurred. In conducting its annual impairment testing, the Company may first perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. If not, no further goodwill impairment testing is required. If it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, or if the Company elects not to perform a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit, the Company then compares the fair value of the reporting unit to the related net book value. If the net book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is measured and recognized.  

In fiscal 2020, the Company performed qualitative assessments of its reporting units. The annual assessment was completed on of the first day of March and an additional assessment was performed the last day of the fiscal year due to a drop in the share price and in response to the changes in business operating conditions from the COVID-19 pandemic. The assessments indicated that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its respective carrying value. The Company believes no impairmentdoes not believe that any reporting units are at risk for impairment.


Business combinations: The Company accounts for its business combinations in accordance with the accounting guidance in ASC 805. The purchase price of long-livedan acquired business is allocated to its identifiable assets exists at May 31, 2017.and liabilities based on estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated to the assets and liabilities, if any, is recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires management’s judgment, the utilization of independent appraisal firms and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions with respect to the timing and amount of future cash flows, market rate assumptions, actuarial assumptions, and appropriate discount rates, among other items. Refer to Note 2, Business Combination and Acquisition, for additional information.

Amortizable Intangible Assets: Amortizable intangible assets consist primarily of fair values assigned to customer relationships and trade names. Trade names were valued based upon the royalty-saving method and customer relationships were valued based upon the excess earnings method.Amortization is provided over the useful lives of the intangible assets, generally up to ten years, using the straight-line method. The recoverability of amortizable intangible assets is evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recovered, in accordance with the recognition and measurement provisions of ASC 360.

Warranty Obligations: The CorporationCompany’s manufactured housing operations generally provides the retail purchaserhomebuyer with an assurance warranty from the date of its homes and park models with a full fifteen-monthrespective purchase. Estimated warranty against defects in design, materials and workmanship. The warrantiescosts are backed by service departments locatedaccrued as cost of sales at the Corporation’stime of sale. Warranty provisions and reserves are based on estimates of the amounts necessary to settle existing and future claims on homes sold by the manufacturing facilitiessegment as of the balance sheet date. Factors used to calculate the warranty obligation are the estimated number of homes still under warranty and an extensive fieldthe historical average costs incurred to service system.a home.

Estimated warranty costsDealer Volume Rebates: The Company’s manufacturing segment sponsors volume rebate programs under which sales to retailers and builder/developers can qualify for cash rebates generally based on the level of sales attained during a twelve-month period. Volume rebates are accrued at the time of sale based upon currentand are recorded as a reduction of net sales.

Repurchase Agreements: The Company is contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with lending institutions that provide wholesale floor plan financing to retailers. These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products sold to retailers in the event of default by the retailer on their agreement to pay the financial institution. The risk of loss from these agreements is spread over numerous retailers. The repurchase price is generally determined by the original sales historical experience and management’s judgment regarding anticipated rates of warranty claims. The adequacyprice of the product less contractually defined curtailment payments. The Company accounts for the guarantee under its repurchase agreements with the retailers’ financing institutions by estimating and deferring a portion of the related product sale that represents the estimated fair value of the guarantee.

Accrued Self-Insurance: The Company is self-insured for a significant portion of its workers’ compensation, general and product liability, auto liability, health, and property insurance. Insurance coverage is maintained for catastrophic exposures and those risks required to be insured by law. Estimated self-insurance costs are accrued for incurred claims and estimated claims incurred but not yet reported. At March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, the Company had gross reserves for estimated losses under its workers’ compensation programs of $20.5 million and $20.4 million, respectively. The Company also recorded warranty liabilityexpected reimbursements for the portion of those losses above respective program limits of $9.3 million and $8.2 million at March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019.

Equity-Based Compensation: Stock-based compensation is periodically assessedmeasured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is generally recognized as expense ratably on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. Forfeitures are recognized in the period in which they occur.  

Comprehensive Income and Loss: Components of comprehensive income and loss are changes in equity other than those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The aggregate amount is adjustedof such changes to equity that have not yet been recognized in net income or loss are reported in the equity section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as necessary.accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of tax.


Income Taxes: The Corporation recognizesprovision for income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the carrying valuesfinancial statement amounts and the tax basis of assets for financial and liabilities using enacted tax reporting purposes. The realizationrates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent upon the generation of sufficient future taxable income.

Generally accepted accounting principles require that an entity consider both negative and positive evidence in In determining whether a valuation allowance is warranted. In comparing negative and positive evidence, losses in fiscal years 2008 to 2015 is considered significant, negative, objective evidence that deferred tax assets may not be realized in the future and generally is assigned more weight than subjective positive evidencetax consequences of the realizability of deferred tax assets. As a result of its extensive evaluation of both positive and negative evidence, management maintains a valuation allowance against substantially all of its deferred tax assets. The Corporation reports a liability, if any, for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Corporation recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Earnings per Share — Basic earnings per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the combination of dilutive common share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Corporation’s Stock Incentive Plan and the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period.

Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of in-the-money options to purchase shares, which is calculated based on the average share price for each period using the treasury stock method, as well as restricted stock awards. 225,000 of 274,000 stock options granted under the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan had a dilutive effect on earnings per share for the year ended May 31, 2017.

Consolidated statements of cash flows — The Corporation’s cash flows were not affected by income taxes in fiscal 2017 and 2016. Cash flows were affected by interest paid of approximately $241,000 in fiscal 2017. Cash flows were affected by interest paid of approximately $237,000 in fiscal 2016.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements — In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (FASB), issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02,Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date:

A lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 1.Nature of Operations, Accounting Policies of Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Recently issued accounting pronouncements  —  (continued)

A right-of-use asset, which is an assetevents that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term.

Public business entities should apply the amendments in ASU 2016-02 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for all public business entities upon issuance.

Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presentedhave been recognized in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Corporation anticipates implementing this pronouncement without a material effect on financial condition and results of operations.statements or tax returns, judgment is required.

In July 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11,Inventory, which requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Public business entities should apply ASU No. 2015-11 for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation anticipates implementing this pronouncement without a material effect on financial condition and results of operations.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,Improvements to Employee Share-Based PaymentRecently Adopted Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for share-based payment transactions related to: the income tax consequences related to exercised or vested share-based payment awards; the classification of awards as either assets or liabilities; and the classification in the consolidated statements of cash flows. In addition, ASU 2016-09 provides an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. For public entities, this update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Corporation has elected to continue its current policy of estimating forfeitures rather than recognizing forfeitures when they occur, and anticipates implementing this pronouncement without a material effect on financial condition and results of operations upon adoption on June 1, 2017.

Pronouncements:In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,an amendment on revenue recognition. The amendment created Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (Topic 66) (“ASC 606”) and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendment supersedes the cost guidance in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and created new Subtopic 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs - Contracts with Customers. The core principal of ASU 2014-09 is thatUnder ASC 606 an entity should recognizerecognizes revenue to depictin a manner that reflects the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ForOn April 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method as applied to customer contracts that were not completed as of March 31, 2018. As a public entity, thisresult, financial information for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2018, are presented in accordance with ASC 606 while prior reporting periods were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policies prior to the adoption of ASC 606. There was no material impact to revenues as a result of applying ASC 606 for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2019 and the post-adoption effects to the Company’s business processes, systems or internal controls were not significant.

On April 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash. The standard requires that changes in restricted cash be reflected with changes in cash and cash equivalents on the statement of cash flows and that a reconciliation between cash and cash equivalents presented on the balance sheet and cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash presented on the statement of cash flows be provided. The provisions of the standard were applied retrospectively, and the effects of adoption were not significant.

In February 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASC 842”), to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. A lessee should recognize in the consolidated balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and an asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous requirements. This ASC 842 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2018 and modified retrospective application is permitted.

The Company adopted ASC 842 as of March 31, 2019, the first day of fiscal 2020 using the modified retrospective approach and without restating comparative periods. The Company has elected to apply the transition package of three practical expedients which allow companies not to reassess whether agreements contain leases, the classification of leases, and the capitalization of initial direct costs. The Company did not elect the practical expedient which permits the use of hindsight when determining the lease term and assessing right-of-use assets for impairment. As permitted by the standard, the Company elected to: (i) recognize lease expense for leases with a term of 12 months or less on a straight-line basis over the lease term and will not recognize any right of use assets or lease liabilities for those leases, and (ii) not separate lease and non-lease components.

The primary financial statement impact upon adoption was the recognition, on a discounted basis, of the Company's minimum commitments under non-cancelable operating leases as right of use assets and obligations on the consolidated balance sheets. The adoption of ASC 842 resulted in the recognition of lease-related assets and liabilities of $13.7 million. The standard did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or cash flows.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Pending Adoption: In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The standard simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments and allows a goodwill impairment charge to be based on the amount of a reporting unit’s carrying value in excess of its fair value. This eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill or what is known as “Step 2” under the current guidance. This guidance is effective for annual reportingand interim periods of public entities beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.

In June 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is permitted. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU No. 2014-09, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, which deferred2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, as amended. The amendments in this update require measurement of impairment of all financial instruments including accounts receivable, long-term notes receivable, and financial guarantees based on current conditions and forward-looking information, rather than historical experience. The new methodology may result in earlier recognition of credit losses compared to the current standard. The ASU is effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. In addition, FASB subsequently issued ASU 2016-08,Principal versus Agent Considerations, ASU 2016-10,Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, ASU 2016-11,Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting, and ASU 2016-12,Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Corporation is currently evaluating howCompany does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09the standard will have a material impact itson the Company's consolidated financial statements.


There were no other accounting standards recently issued that are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

2.

Business Combination

Skyline Corporation Transaction

The Exchange between Champion Holdings and Skyline was completed on June 1, 2018 and was accounted for as a reverse acquisition under the acquisition method of accounting as provided by ASC 805. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of the Exchange were recorded at their respective fair values and added to the carrying value of Champion Holdings’ existing assets and liabilities. The Company incurred Exchange transaction-related costs of approximately $6.9 million and $7.2 million for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively, which were recorded as incurred and have been classified as other expense in the consolidated statements of operations. NaN Exchange transaction-related expenses were recorded in fiscal 2020. Additionally, the Company incurred approximately $6.0 million in stock compensation expense related to former Skyline employees during fiscal 2019, which is recorded in SG&A in the consolidated statements of operations.

The purchase price of the acquisition was determined with reference to the value of equity (common stock) of the Company based on the closing price on June 1, 2018 of $33.39 per share. The purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using their estimated fair values at June 1, 2018, the closing of the Exchange. The purchase price and the allocation have been used to prepare the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  

The final allocation of the purchase price was as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

9,722

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

 

13,876

 

Inventory

 

 

19,028

 

Assets held for sale

 

 

2,086

 

Property, plant, and equipment

 

 

40,220

 

Deferred tax assets, net

 

 

7,034

 

Other assets

 

 

6,706

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

(36,027

)

Intangibles

 

 

52,065

 

Goodwill

 

 

170,342

 

Total purchase price allocation

 

$

285,052

 

Goodwill is primarily attributable to expected synergies from the combination of the companies, including, but not limited to, expected cost synergies through procurement activities and operational improvements through sharing of best practices. Goodwill, which is not deductible for income tax purposes, was allocated to the U.S. Factory-built Housing reporting unit.

Cash, trade accounts receivable, other assets, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities were generally stated at historical carrying values given the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities. Intangible assets consist primarily of amounts recognized for the fair value of customer relationships and trade names and were based on an independent appraisal. Customer-based assets include the Company’s established relationships with its customers and the ability of those customers to generate future economic profits for the Company. The Company estimates that these intangible assets have a weighted average useful life of ten years from the acquisition date. Fair value estimates of plant, property, and equipment were based on independent appraisals and broker opinions of value, giving consideration to the highest and best use of the assets. Key assumptions used in the appraisals were based on a combination of market and cost approaches, as appropriate. Level 3 fair value estimates of $40.2 million related to property, plant, and equipment and $52.1 million related to intangible assets were recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of March 28, 2020. The Company determined $2.1 million of property acquired met the definition of held for sale and is classified in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 30, 2019. In November 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,Balance Sheet Classificationthe first quarter of fiscal 2020, a loss of $1.0 million was recorded related to this held-for-sale property based on market information. The property was sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 for $1.1 million. For further information on acquired assets measured at fair value, see Note 7, Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

The Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to certain realizable deferred tax assets totaling $27.3 million. Deferred Taxes. ASU 2015-17 requirestax assets are primarily federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and credits offset by a valuation allowance for certain state


net operating loss carryforwards that are not expected to be realized. The deferred tax assets are offset by deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrentof $20.3 million resulting from the purchase price allocation step-up in a classifiedfair value that exceed the historical tax basis.

The statement of financial position. For public companies this update is effectiveoperations for annual periods beginning after December 15,

fiscal 2019 includes $218.8 million of net sales attributable to the acquired Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 1.Nature of Operations, Accounting Policies of Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Recently issued accounting pronouncements  —  (continued)operations.

 

2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted asA summary of the beginningresults of operations for the Company, on an interimas reported and on a pro forma basis, are as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

March 30, 2019

 

 

Year Ended

March 31, 2018

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Reported

 

 

Pro forma

 

 

Reported

 

 

Pro forma

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,360,043

 

 

$

1,405,847

 

 

$

1,064,722

 

 

$

1,297,159

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

(58,208

)

 

 

(43,460)

 

 

 

15,800

 

 

 

25,655

 

 

The pro forma results are based on adding the historical results of operations of Champion and Skyline and adjusting those historical amounts for the amortization of intangibles created in the Exchange; the increase in depreciation as a result of the step-up in fair value of property, plant, and equipment; removing transaction costs directly associated with the Exchange; removing equity-based compensation expense directly resulting from the Exchange; reflecting the financing arrangements entered into in connection with the Exchange, and adjusting those items for income taxes. The pro forma disclosures do not give effect to the potential impact of current financial conditions, any anticipated synergies, operating efficiencies or annual period.cost savings that may result from the Exchange or any integration costs. The Corporation adopted this pronouncement atpro forma data is intended for informational purposes and is not indicative of the beginning of fiscal 2017 without a material effect on financial condition andfuture results of operations.

NOTE 2Discontinued Operations

During September 2014,The Exchange Agreement provided that the CorporationCompany was permitted to pay a capital distribution prior to completion of the Exchange to the extent it had cash in excess of debt and other debt-like items and unpaid Exchange fees and expenses. Prior to the completion of the Exchange, the Company made a strategic decisioncapital distribution to exitits members equal to an aggregate of $65.3 million (of which $22.5 million was reflected as a reduction to retained earnings and $42.8 million was reflected as a reduction to members’ contributed capital).

3.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

A reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash was as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet - cash and cash equivalents

 

$

209,455

 

 

$

126,634

 

 

$

113,731

 

Balance sheet - restricted cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,885

 

Statement of cash flows - cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 

$

209,455

 

 

$

126,634

 

 

$

136,616

 

4.

Inventories, net

The components of inventory, net of reserves for obsolete inventory, were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw materials

 

$

55,408

 

 

$

48,531

 

Work in process

 

 

17,773

 

 

 

13,973

 

Finished goods and other

 

 

53,205

 

 

 

60,134

 

Total inventories, net

 

$

126,386

 

 

$

122,638

 

At March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, reserves for obsolete inventory were $4.2 million and $4.1 million, respectively.


5.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is calculated primarily on the recreational vehicle industrystraight-line method, generally over the following estimated useful lives: land improvements – 3 to 10 years; buildings and improvements – 8 to 25 years; and vehicles and machinery and equipment – 3 to 8 years. Depreciation expense, for the fiscal years ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018 was $13.1 million, $11.3 million, and $7.8 million, respectively.  

The components of property, plant, and equipment were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land and improvements

 

$

35,332

 

 

$

34,264

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

87,222

 

 

 

83,973

 

Machinery and equipment

 

 

51,239

 

 

 

42,476

 

Construction in progress

 

 

1,810

 

 

 

3,619

 

Property, plant, and equipment, at cost

 

 

175,603

 

 

 

164,332

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(66,312

)

 

 

(55,745

)

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

$

109,291

 

 

$

108,587

 

6.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in order to focus on its core housing business. Asa business combination. At March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, the Company had goodwill of $173.5 million and $173.4 million, respectively. The change in the goodwill balance during the period was a result of the finalization of the purchase price allocation related to the Exchange. Goodwill is allocated to reporting units included in the U.S. Factory-built Housing segment, which include the Company’s U.S. manufacturing and retail operations.

Intangible Assets

The components of amortizable intangible assets were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28, 2020

 

 

March 30, 2019

 

 

 

Customer

Relationships

 

 

Trade

Names

 

 

Total

 

 

Customer

Relationships

 

 

Trade

Names

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross carrying amount

 

$

48,370

 

 

$

13,068

 

 

$

61,438

 

 

$

48,782

 

 

$

13,173

 

 

$

61,955

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(13,118

)

 

 

(4,963

)

 

 

(18,081

)

 

 

(9,052

)

 

 

(3,967

)

 

 

(13,019

)

Amortizable intangibles, net

 

$

35,252

 

 

$

8,105

 

 

$

43,357

 

 

$

39,730

 

 

$

9,206

 

 

$

48,936

 

Weighted average remaining amortization period, in years

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

8.0

 

The Company recognized customer relationships of $43.1 million and trade names of $9.0 million related to the Exchange. The fair value of the customer relationship intangible asset was estimated using the multi-period excess earnings method of the income approach. The fair value of the customer relationship intangible asset was determined based on October 7, 2014,estimates and assumptions of projected cash flows attributable to the Corporation completedacquired customer relationships, the saleannual attrition rate of certainexisting customer relationships, the contributory asset charges attributable to the assets that support the customer relationships, such as: (i) net working capital; (ii) property, plant, and equipment; (iii) trade names; and (iv) workforce, with the economic life and the discount rate as determined at the time of the final valuation. The fair value of the trade names intangible asset was estimated using the relief-from-royalty method of the income approach. The fair value of the trade names intangible asset was determined based on estimates and assumptions of the expected life of the intangible asset, the royalty rate, and the discount rate that reflects the level of risk associated with its recreational vehicle segment to Evergreen Recreational Vehicles, LLC.

The following table summarizes the resultsfuture cash flows, as determined at the time of discontinued operations:the final valuation.

 

   Year Ended 
   May 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Net Sales

  $   $71 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating loss of discontinued operations

  $   $(195
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

       (195

Income tax expense

        
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  $   $(195
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 


Amortization of intangible assets for the fiscal years ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018 was $5.4 million, $4.8 million, and $0.5 million respectively. Estimated amortization expense of intangible assets over the next five years is estimated to be (dollars in thousands):

Fiscal 2021

 

$

5,443

 

Fiscal 2022

 

 

5,443

 

Fiscal 2023

 

 

5,326

 

Fiscal 2024

 

 

5,278

 

Fiscal 2025

 

 

5,278

 

NOTE 3

7.

Inventories

Other Current Liabilities

Total inventories from continuing operations consistThe components of other current liabilities were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28, 2020

 

 

March 30, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer deposits

 

$

22,679

 

 

$

27,873

 

Accrued volume rebates

 

 

17,469

 

 

 

21,020

 

Accrued warranty obligations

 

 

19,179

 

 

 

17,886

 

Accrued compensation and payroll taxes

 

 

27,776

 

 

 

32,075

 

Accrued insurance

 

 

11,182

 

 

 

16,245

 

Other

 

 

15,745

 

 

 

14,462

 

Total other current liabilities

 

$

114,030

 

 

$

129,561

 

8.

Accrued Warranty Obligations

Changes in the accrued warranty obligations were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at the beginning of the period

 

$

23,346

 

 

$

15,430

 

Warranty assumed in the Exchange

 

 

 

 

 

6,259

 

Warranty expense

 

 

39,434

 

 

 

37,298

 

Cash warranty payments

 

 

(37,811

)

 

 

(35,641

)

Balance at end of period

 

 

24,969

 

 

 

23,346

 

Less noncurrent portion in other long-term liabilities

 

 

(5,790

)

 

 

(5,460

)

Total current portion

 

$

19,179

 

 

$

17,886

 

9.

Debt and Floor Plan Payable

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

 

   May 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Raw materials

  $7,734   $7,198 

Work in process

   4,030    3,447 

Finished goods

   469    736 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $12,233   $11,381 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28, 2020

 

 

March 30, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility maturing in 2023

 

$

64,900

 

 

$

41,900

 

Obligations under industrial revenue bonds due 2029

 

 

12,430

 

 

 

12,430

 

Total debt

 

 

77,330

 

 

 

54,330

 

Less current portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

77,330

 

 

$

54,330

 

 

NOTE 4Net Gain on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment

InOn June 5, 2018, the fourth quarterCompany entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement provides for a revolving credit facility of up to $100.0 million, including a letter of credit sub-facility of not less than $45 million. Initial borrowings under the Credit Agreement were used to repay the Company’s $46.9 million term loans and replace the Company’s existing cash collateralized stand-alone letter of credit facility. During fiscal 2017,2020, the Corporation sold real property and substantially allCompany elected to repay $15.0 million of the equipment at its formeroutstanding balance on the revolving credit facility locatedduring the first nine months and borrowed $38.0 million on the revolving credit facility in Mansfield, Texas. March 2020.

The net sales price was $2,212,000, resulting in a gain of $1,502,000.Credit Agreement matures on June 5, 2023 and has no scheduled amortization. The assets sold were securityinterest rate under the Corporation’s Secured Revolving Credit Facility with First Business Capital. First Business Capital released its lienAgreement adjusts based on the real property subject to $1,100,000first lien net leverage of the Company. From June 5, 2018 through December 31, 2018, the annual interest rate was the selected London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.75%. Thereafter, the interest rate adjusts based on the first lien net sales proceeds being heldleverage from a high of LIBOR plus 2.25% and ABR plus 1.25% when the first lien net leverage is equal to or greater than 2.00:1.00, to a low of LIBOR plus 1.50% and ABR plus 0.50% when the first lien net leverage is below 0.50:1.00. In addition, the Company is obligated to pay an unused line fee ranging between 0.25% and 0.40% (depending on the first lien net leverage) in respect of unused commitments under the Credit Agreement. At March 28, 2020 the interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Agreement was 2.4%. At March 28, 2020, letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement totaled $28.7 million. Total available borrowings under the Credit Agreement as of March 28, 2020 were $6.4 million.

Also, prior to entering into the Credit Agreement, the Company provided letters of credit issued by a commercial bank under a separate stand-alone facility collateralized with restricted cash collateral accountof 101% of the issued letters of credit. Subsequent to entering into the Credit Agreement, the Company is no longer required to back letters of credit with restricted cash.

Obligations under industrial revenue bonds are supported by letters of credit and bear interest based on a municipal bond index rate. The weighted-average interest rate at First Business Bank, an affiliateMarch 28, 2020, including related costs and fees, was 6.31%. At March 30, 2019, the weighted-average interest rate, including related costs and fees, was 3.62%. The industrial revenue bonds require lump-sum payments of First Business Capital. principal upon maturity in 2029.

The gainCredit Agreement contains covenants that restrict the amount of additional debt, liens and certain payments, including equity buybacks, investments, dispositions, mergers and consolidations, among other restrictions as defined. The Company was offsetin compliance with all covenants of the Credit Agreement as of March 28, 2020.

Floor Plan Payable

The Company’s retail operations utilize floor plan financing to fund the acquisition of manufactured homes for display or resale. At March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, the Company had outstanding borrowings on floor plan financing agreements of $33.9 million and $33.3 million, respectively. The financing arrangements allow for borrowings up to $48.0 million. Borrowings are secured by $222,000 in losses associatedthe homes and are required to be repaid when the Company sells the home to a customer.   

10.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue is recognized when performance obligations under the terms of a contract are satisfied which generally occurs with the disposaltransfer of Mansfield equipment not sold,control of products. The Company enters into contracts with its customers to provide manufactured homes, modular homes, park model RVs, ADUs, commercial structures and transportation services. Generally, the Company’s contracts may be terminated by the Company’s customers at any time. Historically, terminations of these contracts have been minimal. The Company receives signed sales quotes from its customers, which provide the terms for a specific home, including price. The Company also has agreements with certain customers that provide for certain variable considerations such as volume discounts that are deducted from the contract price and accrued at the time of sale. In certain situations, the Company may receive payment in advance of completion of its contractual obligations. In these situations, the arising contract liability is classified within customer deposits and receipts in excess of revenues. Following the receipt of the customer deposit, the Company typically completes its performance obligation within a twelve-month period.


For sales to independent retailers and builders/developers, revenue is recognized at the point in time when wholesale floor plan financing or retailer credit approval has been received, the home has shipped and title has transferred, which occurs when the Company has satisfied its contractual obligations and the sale or disposalcontrol of equipment usedits products has been transferred. The Company does not have an enforceable right to payment prior to shipment. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those products. The Company’s customers pay for products received in accordance with payment terms that are customary within the industry. As is customary in the factory-built housing industry, a significant portion of the Company’s sales to independent retailers are financed under floor plan financing programs with certain third-party lenders. Floor plan financing arrangements are generally identified prior to shipment of products and payment for sales financed under floor plan programs is generally received 5 to 10 business days from the date of invoice.

For retail sales to consumers from Company-owned retail sales centers, revenue is recognized when the home has been delivered, set up and accepted by the Corporation’s former facility in Elkhart, Indiana.consumer, and title has transferred.

 

The Company recognizes commercial revenue and related cost of sales for long-term construction contracts (“Commercial”) over time as performance obligations are satisfied using the percentage-of-completion method (input method). Management estimates the stage of completion on each construction project based on progress and costs incurred. Unbilled revenue on long-term construction contracts are classified as a contract asset in accounts receivable. Receipts in excess of billings are classified as contract liabilities and included in other current liabilities. At March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, uncollected billings related to long-term construction contracts totaled $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively. There was 0 unbilled revenue for long-term contracts at March 28, 2020 or March 30, 2019.  

Revenue for the Company’s transportation operations is recognized when a shipment has been delivered to its final destination. Amounts billed to customers related to shipping and handling costs are included in net sales. Shipping and handling costs are accounted for as fulfillment costs and are included in cost of sales.

The following tables disaggregate the Company’s revenue by sales category:

 

 

Year Ended March 28, 2020

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

U.S.

Factory-Built

Housing

 

 

Canadian

Factory-built

Housing

 

 

Corporate/

Other

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Manufacturing and retail

 

$

1,218,293

 

 

$

84,196

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,302,489

 

Commercial

 

 

8,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,100

 

Transportation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,141

 

 

 

59,141

 

Total

 

$

1,226,393

 

 

$

84,196

 

 

$

59,141

 

 

$

1,369,730

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 30, 2019

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

U.S.

Factory-Built

Housing

 

 

Canadian

Factory-built

Housing

 

 

Corporate/

Other

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Manufacturing and retail

 

$

1,166,245

 

 

$

98,567

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,264,812

 

Commercial

 

 

11,442

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,442

 

Transportation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

83,789

 

 

 

83,789

 

Total

 

$

1,177,687

 

 

$

98,567

 

 

$

83,789

 

 

$

1,360,043

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended March 31, 2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

U.S.

Factory-Built

Housing

 

 

Canadian

Factory-built

Housing

 

 

Corporate/

Other

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Manufacturing and retail

 

$

841,354

 

 

$

96,603

 

 

$

 

 

$

937,957

 

Commercial

 

 

19,134

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,134

 

Transportation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107,631

 

 

 

107,631

 

Total

 

$

860,488

 

 

$

96,603

 

 

$

107,631

 

 

$

1,064,722

 

11. Leases


The Company has operating leases for land, manufacturing and office facilities, and equipment. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise such option. The Company's leases do not contain material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease terms. Lease expense included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations is shown below:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

Operating lease expense

 

$

5,884

 

Short-term lease expense

 

 

1,378

 

Total lease expense

 

$

7,262

 

Net rent expense was $6.6 million and $5.8 million during fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Operating lease assets and obligations included in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet are shown below:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

Right-of-use assets under operating leases:

 

 

 

 

Other long-term assets

 

$

14,808

 

Lease obligations under operating leases:

 

 

 

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

4,789

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

10,019

 

Total lease obligation

 

$

14,808

 

Maturities of lease obligations as of March 28, 2020 are shown below:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

Fiscal 2021

 

$

5,411

 

Fiscal 2022

 

 

4,431

 

Fiscal 2023

 

 

3,360

 

Fiscal 2024

 

 

1,414

 

Fiscal 2025

 

 

784

 

Thereafter

 

 

1,771

 

Total undiscounted cash flows

 

 

17,171

 

Less: imputed interest

 

 

(2,363

)

Lease obligations under operating leases

 

$

14,808

 

The weighted average lease term and discount rate for operating leases are shown below:

NOTE 5

Other Assets

March 28,

2020

Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)

4.7

Weighted average discount rate

5.5

Other assets consist primarily of

The discount rate used to measure a lease obligation should be the cash surrenderrate implicit in the lease; however, the Company’s operating leases generally do not provide an implicit rate. Accordingly, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate at lease commencement to determine the present value of life insurance policieslease payments. The incremental borrowing rate is an entity-specific rate which totaled $7,093,000 and $6,885,000 at May 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.represents the rate of interest a lessee would pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term with similar payments.



Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

NotesCash flow information related to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

operating leases is shown below:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Year Ended

March 28, 2020

 

Non-cash activity:

 

 

 

 

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations

 

$

6,177

 

Operating cash flows:

 

 

 

 

Cash paid related to operating lease obligations

 

$

5,811

 

NOTE 6

12.

Warranty

Income Taxes

A reconciliation of accrued warranty isPretax income (loss) for the fiscal years ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018 was attributable to the following tax jurisdictions:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

$

76,224

 

 

$

(50,891

)

 

$

32,470

 

Foreign

 

 

8,830

 

 

 

9,588

 

 

 

10,646

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

$

85,054

 

 

$

(41,303

)

 

$

43,116

 

The income tax provision by jurisdiction for the fiscal years ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018 was as follows:

 

   Year Ended 
   May 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Balance at the beginning of the period

  $7,317   $6,911 

Accruals for warranties

   7,757    6,898 

Settlements made during the period

   (7,517   (6,492
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at the end of the period

   7,557    7,317 

Non-current balance

   2,800    2,500 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accrued warranty

  $4,757   $4,817 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal

 

$

9,360

 

 

$

9,353

 

 

$

10,033

 

Foreign

 

 

1,938

 

 

 

1,452

 

 

 

2,269

 

State

 

 

3,800

 

 

 

3,053

 

 

 

2,100

 

Total current

 

$

15,098

 

 

$

13,858

 

 

$

14,402

 

Deferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. federal

 

$

5,660

 

 

$

1,854

 

 

$

9,694

 

Foreign

 

 

5,214

 

 

 

987

 

 

 

3,640

 

State

 

 

922

 

 

 

206

 

 

 

(420

)

Total deferred

 

$

11,796

 

 

$

3,047

 

 

$

12,914

 

Total income tax expense

 

$

26,894

 

 

$

16,905

 

 

$

27,316

 

 

NOTE 7Life Insurance Loans

Life insurance loans have no fixed repayment schedule, and have interest rates ranging from 4.2 percent to 7.4 percent. The weighted average interest rate is 5.2 percent. Prepaid interest associated with the life insurance loans totaled approximately $88,000 at May 31, 2017 and May 31, 2016, respectively; which is recorded in Other current assets.

 

NOTE 8Customer Concentration

During fiscal 2017, no individual customer had net sales exceeding 10 percent of total net sales. During fiscal 2016, net sales to Sun Home Services, Inc. (“Sun Home”) totaled $22,231,000 or 10 percent of total net sales. Based on past sales to Sun Home,


Income tax expense (benefit) differs from the Corporation could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and resultsamount of operations if the Corporation experienced a loss of this customer or if the volume of sales significantly decreased.

NOTE 9Income Taxes

The Corporation had no federal and state income tax benefit or expense fordetermined by applying the years ended May 31, 2017 and 2016.

The difference between the Corporation’sapplicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes as a result of 34 percent in fiscalthe following differences:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

Tax expense (benefit) at U.S federal statutory rate

 

$

17,861

 

 

$

(8,674

)

 

$

13,599

 

Increase (decrease) in rate resulting from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit

 

$

4,491

 

 

$

2,412

 

 

$

1,083

 

Change in deferred tax valuation allowance

 

 

3,652

 

 

 

(986

)

 

 

(8,632

)

Non-deductible compensation due to Section 162(m)

 

 

1,007

 

 

 

2,760

 

 

 

 

Other permanent difference

 

 

844

 

 

 

531

 

 

 

617

 

Deferred tax rate changes

 

 

538

 

 

 

928

 

 

 

9,115

 

Foreign tax rate differences

 

 

502

 

 

 

579

 

 

 

(413

)

Global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI")

 

 

339

 

 

 

524

 

 

 

 

Recognition of foreign investment basis difference

 

 

25

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

12,199

 

Non-deductible equity-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

17,545

 

 

 

203

 

Domestic production activities deduction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(970

)

Transaction costs related to the Exchange

 

 

 

 

 

2,051

 

 

 

 

Uncertain tax positions

 

 

(643

)

 

 

(590

)

 

 

23

 

U.S. tax credits

 

 

(1,005

)

 

 

(445

)

 

 

(75

)

Other

 

 

(717

)

 

 

23

 

 

 

567

 

Total income tax expense

 

$

26,894

 

 

$

16,905

 

 

$

27,316

 

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and 2016, andJobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act made several changes to the effectiveU.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, with the following changes being most impactful: (1) decreased the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%; (2) implemented a territorial tax system; (3) eliminated the Section 199 Domestic Production Activities Deduction; (4) expanded the scope of executive compensation that is due primarilysubject to stateSection 162(m) deduction limitations and (5) allowed for immediate expensing of certain qualified property placed in service after September 27, 2017.

The Tax Act subjects a U.S. shareholder to current tax on GILTI earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740 No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that an entity can make an accounting election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. The Company has elected to recognize the tax on GILTI as a period expense in the period the tax is incurred.

The U.S. income taxestax rate for fiscal 2020 and changesfiscal 2019 is 21%. The U.S. income tax rate for fiscal 2018 was a blended rate of 31.5%. This rate was calculated under the guidance of Internal Revenue Service Notice 2018-38 by prorating the total annual taxable income by the amount of days in the fiscal year that the enacted 35% rate was applicable (April 2, 2017 to December 31, 2017) and the amount of days in the fiscal year that the enacted 21% rate was applicable (January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2018).


Deferred tax assets and liabilities at March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019 consisted of the following:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets

 

$

9,665

 

 

$

11,110

 

U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

9,368

 

 

 

14,213

 

Warranty reserves

 

 

6,175

 

 

 

5,792

 

Employee compensation

 

 

5,665

 

 

 

6,326

 

Foreign net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

5,400

 

 

 

499

 

Self-insurance reserves

 

 

3,806

 

 

 

4,491

 

Lease assets

 

 

3,684

 

 

 

 

State net operating loss carryforwards

 

 

2,793

 

 

 

4,239

 

Outside basis difference in domestic partnership investment

 

 

2,229

 

 

 

2,133

 

U.S. tax credit carryforwards

 

 

2,030

 

 

 

2,131

 

Inventory reserves and impairments

 

 

1,656

 

 

 

1,660

 

Dealer volume discounts

 

 

1,216

 

 

 

1,409

 

Equity-based compensation

 

 

1,156

 

 

 

929

 

Capitalized transaction costs

 

 

456

 

 

 

534

 

Foreign capital loss carryforwards

 

 

168

 

 

 

186

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

67

 

 

 

9

 

Foreign tax basis difference in investments

 

 

 

 

 

4,601

 

Other

 

 

1,130

 

 

 

648

 

Gross deferred tax assets

 

$

56,664

 

 

$

60,910

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets

 

$

10,711

 

 

$

11,997

 

Property, plant, and equipment

 

 

8,411

 

 

 

7,265

 

Lease liabilities

 

 

3,684

 

 

 

 

Foreign tax basis difference in investments

 

 

3,264

 

 

 

3,422

 

Other

 

 

837

 

 

 

297

 

Gross deferred tax liabilities

 

$

26,907

 

 

$

22,981

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(11,209

)

 

 

(7,293

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

18,548

 

 

$

30,636

 

Due to the ability to repatriate earnings from the foreign subsidiaries tax-free because of the Tax Act, the Company anticipates periodically repatriating the earnings of its Netherlands and Canadian subsidiaries. Prior to the enactment of the Tax Act, the Company’s policy was that all undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries were permanently reinvested except for its former U.K. subsidiaries. A deferred tax liability is recognized for income tax withholding which may be incurred upon the reversal of basis differences in investments in its foreign subsidiaries.

The Company periodically evaluates the realizability of its deferred tax assets valuation allowance and are as follows:

   Year Ended 
   May 31, 
   2017  2016 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Income taxes at statutory federal rate

  $2  $637 

Income taxes on permanent differences

   215   167 

State income taxes

   38   199 

State net operating loss

   104   252 

New Energy Efficient Home Credit

   (142  (237

Decrease in deferred tax assets valuation allowance

   (348  (1,031

Other, net

   131   13 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income tax expense

  $  $ 
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Effective tax rate

   0  0
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 9.Income Taxes — (Continued)

Componentsbased on whether it is “more likely than not” that some portion of the net noncurrent deferred tax assets include:

   Year Ended 
   May 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Accrued marketing programs

  $142   $181 

Accrued warranty expense

   2,979    2,888 

Accrued workers’ compensation

   1,151    1,011 

Accrued vacation

   178    346 

Liability for certain post-retirement benefits

   1,762    1,850 

Federal net operating loss carryforward

   32,119    32,380 

Federal tax credit carryforward

   1,910    1,787 

State net operating loss carryforward

   7,566    7,717 

Depreciation

   684    714 

Other

   221    134 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total gross noncurrent deferred tax assets

   48,712    49,008 

Valuation allowance

   (48,660   (49,008
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net noncurrent deferred tax assets

  $52   $ 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

At May 31, 2017,will not be realized. Our evaluation considers available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether sufficient future taxable income will be generated to permit use of the Corporation had grossexisting deferred tax assets. Due to the Exchange on June 1, 2018, the Company has U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $94 million and gross state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $103 million. The federal net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards havethat were generated by the pre-Exchange Skyline entities. At March 28, 2020, the Company has provided a life expectancy of between eleven and eighteen years. The state net operating loss carryforwards have a life expectancy, depending on the state where a loss was incurred, between one and twenty years.

The Corporation has recorded a full$1.4 million valuation allowance against this asset, aside from $52,000 associatedfor certain state NOL carryforwards. At March 28, 2020, the Company established a valuation allowance of $4.2 million for certain Canadian deferred tax assets. The Company maintains a valuation allowance with an alternative minimum tax credit recognized primarily in fiscal year 2017. If the Corporation, after considering future negative and positive evidence regarding the realization ofrespect to its deferred tax assets determines that a lesser valuation allowance is warranted, it would record a reduction to incomein the Netherlands for fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018. The fiscal 2020 value of the deferred tax expenseassets and therelated valuation allowance in the periodNetherlands was adjusted to reflect the Netherlands statutory tax rate decrease from 25.0% to 21.7% expected in 2021.

As of determination. For fiscal 2017,March 28, 2020, the Corporation reported the utilization of previously fully-reservedCompany has U.S. federal net operating lossNOL carryforwards of $166,000$44.6 million, which expire in 2032 through 2035. The Company also has state NOL carryforwards in various jurisdictions which expire primarily in 2020 through 2040.


Unrecognized tax benefits represent the differences between tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return and state operating loss carryforwards of $47,000the benefits recognized for financial statement purposes. The Company’s total unrecognized tax benefits were $0.6 million at March 30, 2019. There were 0 unrecognized tax benefits at March 28, 2020. The Company classifies interest and released corresponding amounts of the valuation allowance to offset federal and statepenalties on income tax uncertainties as a component of income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties as of March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, were not significant. The following table provides the changes in unrecognized tax benefits at March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019:

Income

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period

 

$

643

 

 

$

1,246

 

Increase related to tax positions taken during a prior period

 

 

 

 

 

44

 

Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations

 

 

(643

)

 

 

(647

)

Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period

 

$

 

 

$

643

 

The Company estimates no material changes to uncertain tax returns are filedbenefits in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in several state jurisdictions. For the majority of taxing jurisdictions the Corporationnext twelve months. The Company is no longer subject to examinationforeign tax examinations by taxingtax authorities for years before 2013.prior to fiscal 2016. The Corporation did not incur any interest or penaltiesCompany’s U.S. subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for fiscal 2018 through fiscal 2020, and U.S. state tax examinations by tax authorities for fiscal 2017 through fiscal 2020. In October 2018, the Company received a notice of examination from the Internal Revenue Service for the Company’s federal income tax return for the fiscal year ended April 1, 2017. This examination was closed in February 2020 with no audit adjustments.

13.

Equity-Based Compensation

The Company has equity incentive plans under which the Company has been authorized to grant share-based awards to key employees and non-employee directors. Equity-based compensation expense of $8.3 million, $102.0 million, and $0.6 million was recognized in fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Included in equity-based compensation in fiscal 2019 is $6.0 million of expense related to former Skyline employees that vested in conjunction with the Exchange. Equity-based compensation expense was included in SG&A expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The total associated income tax mattersbenefit recognized was $1.3 million and $0.2 million in fiscal years 20172020 and 2016.2019, respectively. There was 0 tax benefit recognized in fiscal 2018. Total unrecognized equity-based compensation for all share-based payment plans was $9.4 million at March 28, 2020, of which $5.0 million will be recognized in fiscal 2021, $2.8 million in fiscal 2022 and $1.6 million thereafter, or a weighted-average period of 1.16 years.


Time-Vesting and Performance-Vesting Restricted Share Awards

Champion Holdings granted awards to its officers, management employees, and certain members of the Board of Managers under an equity-classified management incentive plan (the “MIP”). In accordance with the provisions of the MIP, as modified on June 1, 2018, unvested units Champion Holdings granted under the MIP were exchanged for unregistered, time-vesting restricted shares and performance-vesting restricted shares of the Company subject to stock restriction agreements (the “SRAs”). The Corporation has no unrecognized tax benefitsexchange was accounted for as a modification. The time-vesting restricted shares contained service conditions in its financial statementswhich vesting would occur 20% per year over a five-year period, unless certain performance conditions were achieved in which vesting would occur immediately upon a change of control or upon an occurrence of a follow-on public offering as defined in the SRAs. During fiscal 2019, a significant portion of the outstanding restricted shares vested in conjunction with certain follow-on public offerings.  The incremental fair value of the modification of the awards was $95.1 million and was recognized in fiscal 2019 as all vesting conditions were met during the period. The value of the awards that vested during fiscal years 2017 and 2016, and does not expect any significant changes related to unrecognized tax benefits in2020 was $4.2 million. A summary of the twelve months following May 31, 2017.activity associated with these awards is as follows:

 

NOTE 10Commitments and Contingencies

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

Management Incentive Plan Award Units

 

 

Time Based Restricted Share Awards

 

 

Performance Based Restricted Share Awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at April 1, 2017

 

 

 

 

12,504

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

351

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

 

 

(200

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at March 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

12,655

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exchange of MIP awards for restricted share awards

 

 

 

 

(13,655

)

 

 

290

 

 

 

3,686

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,686

)

Outstanding at March 30, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

290

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(145

)

 

 

 

Outstanding at March 28, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

145

 

 

 

 

The Corporation was contingently liable at May 31, 2017

On September 26, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved the Company’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”) which provides for grants of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted and 2016, under repurchase agreements with certain financial institutions providing inventory financing for dealersunrestricted stock and stock units, performance awards, and other awards convertible into or otherwise based on shares of its products. Under these arrangements,

the Company’s common stock. Prior to the approval of the Equity Plan, the Company maintained the Skyline Corporation 2015 Stock Incentive Plan, which allowed for the grant of stock options and Subsidiary Companiesother equity awards. General terms and methods of valuation for the Company’s share-based awards granted under the Equity Plan are described below.


Stock Options

NotesStock options generally have terms of 10 years, with one-third of each grant vesting each year for three years, and are assigned an exercise price that is equal to Consolidated Financial Statements ��� (Continued)

NOTE 10Commitments and Contingencies — (Continued)

which are customaryor greater than closing market price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. When determining expected volatility, the Company considered volatility of guideline public companies. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the manufactured housing and park model industries,time of grant, based on the Corporation agrees to repurchase units in the event of default by the dealer at declining prices over theoptions’ expected term.  The expected term of the agreement. Theoptions is based on the time period to potentially repurchase unitsexercise for each vesting tranche, which is between 12 to 24 months.calculated based on the average of: (i) the full option contractual term; and (ii) the starting vest date. A summary of the activity associated with these awards is as follows:

 

 

Shares (in thousands)

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share

 

 

Weighted Average Remaining Term (in years)

 

 

Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)

 

Outstanding at March 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

146

 

 

$

15.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at March 30, 2019

 

 

146

 

 

$

15.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

266

 

 

$

32.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(8

)

 

$

15.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeitures

 

 

(1

)

 

$

15.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at March 28, 2020

 

 

403

 

 

$

26.29

 

 

 

9.4

 

 

$

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested and expected to vest at March 28, 2020

 

 

403

 

 

$

26.29

 

 

 

9.4

 

 

$

58

 

Exercisable at March 28, 2020

 

 

41

 

 

$

15.00

 

 

 

8.8

 

 

$

17

 

The maximum repurchase liability isassumptions used in the total amount that would be paid uponBlack-Scholes option-pricing model along with the default of the Corporation’s independent dealers.

The maximum potential repurchase liability for continuing and discontinued operations, without reduction for the resale value of the repurchased units, was approximately $30 million at May 31, 2017 and approximately $25 million at May 31, 2016. As a result of favorable experience regarding repurchased units, which is largely due to the strength of dealers selling the Corporation’s products, the Corporation maintained at May 31, 2017 and May 31, 2016, a $100,000 loss reserve that is a component of other accrued liabilities. The risk of loss under these agreements is spread over many dealers and financial institutions. The loss, if any, under these agreements is the difference between the repurchase cost and the resale value of the units. The Corporation estimates theweighted average grant date fair value of this commitment considering both the contingent losses and the value of the guarantee. This amount has historically been insignificant. The Corporation believes that any potential loss under the agreementsfor awards granted in effect at May 31, 2017 will not be material to its financial position or results of operations.

The amounts of obligations from repurchased units, all of which were from discontinued operations, and incurred net losses for the periods presented are as follows:

 

   Year Ended 
   May 31, 
   2017   2016 
   (Dollars in thousands) 

Number of units repurchased

       6 

Obligations from units repurchased

  $   $115 

Net losses on repurchased units

  $   $50 

Option Award Assumptions

 

Fiscal 2020

 

 

Fiscal 2019

 

Weighted-average assumptions used:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected volatility

 

 

30.0

%

 

 

25.8

%

Dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.7

%

 

 

2.4

%

Expected term, in years

 

 

5.88

 

 

 

5.75

 

Weighted average grant date fair value per share

 

$

10.33

 

 

$

3.93

 


Performance Share Units

In fiscal 2020 and 2019, the Company issued performance share units that contain market vesting conditions and service conditions. The Corporationmarket condition is based on the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) compared to the median TSR of certain companies over a partythree year performance period. The Company used a Monte-Carlo simulation to various pending legal proceedingsdetermine the grant date fair value for these awards, which takes into consideration the possible outcomes pertaining to the TSR market condition. In general, 0% to 150% of the Company’s performance share units vest on the third anniversary of the vesting commencement date based upon achievement of the market condition as specified in the normal course of business. Management believes that any losses resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s results of operations or financial position.

The Corporation utilizes a combination of insurance coverage and self-insurance for certain items, including workers’ compensation and group health benefits. Liabilities for workers’ compensation are recognized for estimated future medical costs and indemnity costs. Liabilities for group health benefits are recognized for claims incurred but not paid. Insurance reserves are estimated based upon a combination of historical data and actuarial information. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

NOTE 11Secured Revolving Credit Facility

On March 20, 2015, the Corporation (“Borrower(s)”) entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with First Business Capital Corp. (“First Business Capital”). Under the Loan Agreement, First Business Capital will provide a secured revolving credit facility to the Borrowers for a term of three years, renewable on an annual basis thereafter with each renewal for a successive one-year term. The Corporation may obtain loan advances up to a maximum of $10,000,000 subject to certain collateral-obligation ratios. In addition, loan advances bear interest at 3.75% in excess ofThe Wall Street Journal’s published one-year LIBOR rate, and are secured by substantially allperformance share unit agreement. A summary of the Borrowers’ assets, now owned or hereafter acquired. Interestactivity associated with these awards is payable monthly, in arrears, and all principal and accrued but unpaid interest is due and payable upon termination of the

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 11Secured Revolving Credit Facility — (Continued)

Loan Agreement. First Business Capital also agreed under the Loan Agreement to issue, or cause to be issued by a bank affiliate or other bank, letters of credit for the account of the Corporation. However, no advances have yet been made in connection with such letters of credit.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Corporation on two occasions did not meet a covenant requiring a monthly loss not exceeding $500,000. Consequently, the Corporation received in the second quarter a waiver of the defaults that occurred. In addition, the following modifications were made to the Loan Agreement.as follows:

 

 

 

Shares (in thousands)

 

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit

 

Outstanding at March 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

146

 

 

$

3.62

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

$

-

 

Outstanding at March 30, 2019

 

146

 

 

$

3.62

 

Granted

 

 

86

 

 

$

29.05

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

$

-

 

Forfeitures

 

 

(2

)

 

$

3.62

 

Outstanding at March 28, 2020

 

 

230

 

 

$

13.85

 

A covenant specifying that a monthly loss not exceed $500,000 was modified to $1,500,000 for December 2015, $1,000,000 for January 2016, and $1,000,000 for February, 2016. Following February 2016, the maximum monthly net loss as noted

The assumptions used in the original Loan Agreement returns to $500,000Monte-Carlo simulation for March to May 2016, and $250,000 thereafter;

The limitperformance share units along with the weighted-average grant date fair value for awards granted in the lease, purchase or acquisition of any asset increased from $600,000 per year to $800,000 per year; and

The monthly bank assessment fee increased from .25% per annum to .35% per annum.

In June 2016, additional amendments were made to the Loan Agreement:periods presented are as follows:

 

An increase in the capital expenditure limit for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 from $800,000 in the aggregate to $1,250,000 in the aggregate;

Performance Unit Assumptions

 

Fiscal 2020

 

 

Fiscal 2019

 

Weighted-average assumptions used:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected volatility

 

 

30.0

%

 

 

29.5

%

Dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

1.6

%

 

 

2.4

%

Expected term, in years

 

 

2.84

 

 

 

2.49

 

Weighted average grant date fair value per share

 

$

29.05

 

 

$

3.62

 

 

An increase in the capital expenditure limit for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2017 from $800,000 in the aggregate to $1,500,000 in the aggregate. In the absence of any subsequent amendment, the capital expenditure limit for subsequent fiscal years shall remain at $800,000 in the aggregate per fiscal year; and

A covenant specifying that a monthly net loss in fiscal 2017 not exceed $250,000 was increased to $500,000 for June 2016, $1,000,000 for July 2016,Restricted Stock Units and $1,000,000 for December 2016. Such increases were effective only for the months identified. In the absence of any subsequent amendment, the maximum monthly net loss for all other months of fiscal year 2017 and thereafter remainRestricted Share Awards

Restricted stock units are valued at $250,000.

In November 2016, the Corporation did not meet a covenant requiring a monthly loss not to exceed $250,000. Subsequent to November 30, 2016, the Corporation received a waiver for the default that occurred in the second quarter. In addition, the Loan Agreement was modified to eliminate the monthly maximum Net Loss covenant effective with the fiscal month ended December 31, 2016.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Corporation did not meet a covenant requiring the year to date net loss not to exceed $1,750,000, and a covenant requiring net worth as of February 28, 2017 to not be below $23,383,000. Subsequent to February 28, 2017, the Corporation received a waiver for the default that occurred in the third quarter and paid to First Business Capital an accommodation fee of $50,000. The Corporation was in compliance with loan agreement covenants as of May 31, 2017.

On July 21, 2017, the Corporation terminated the Loan Agreement in connection with its entry into a new Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. having terms more favorable to the Corporation. As of the date of termination, the Corporation did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Loan Agreement. In addition, the Corporation did not incur any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the Loan Agreement. Information regarding the Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is noted in Note 18, Subsequent Events, of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 12Stock-Based Compensation

In the first quarter of fiscal 2016, the Corporation’s Board of Directors approved the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (“Plan”), which allows the granting of stock options and other equity awards to directors, officers, employees, and eligible independent contractors of the Corporation and is intended to retain and reward key employees’ performance and efforts as they relate to the Corporation’s long-term objectives and strategic plan. The Plan was subsequently approved by shareholders at the Corporation’s annual shareholder meeting on September 21, 2015. A total of 700,000 shares of Common Stock have been reserved for issuance under the Plan. Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Corporation’s stock at the date of grant and vest over a period of time as determined by the Corporation at the date of grant up to the contractual ten-year life at which time the options expire. Restricted stock awards are priced no less than 100 percent of market priceshare of the Corporation’sCompany’s common stock at the date of grant, and the awards made to date fully vest after five years.

Stock Options – The following tables summarize option activity for the years ended May 31, 2017 and 2016:

   Number
of
Shares
   Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
   Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
 

Options outstanding at June 1, 2015

   —     $—       

Granted

   225,000    3.28     
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Options outstanding at May 31, 2016

   225,000   $3.28    9.14   $1,584 
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

Granted

   49,000    11.75     
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Options outstanding at May 31, 2017

   274,000   $4.79    8.40   $128 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Vested and exercisable options at May 31, 2017

   45,000   $3.28    8.14   $89 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during fiscal 2017 and 2016 were $7.58 and $2.19, respectively.

   Number of
Shares
   Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
 

Non-vested options at May 31, 2015

   —     $—   

Granted

   225,000    2.19 

Vested

   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-vested options at May 31, 2016

   225,000   $2.19 

Granted

   49,000    7.58 

Vested

   (45,000   2.19 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-vested options at May 31, 2017

   229,000   $3.34 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 2017 and 2016 was approximately $144,000 and $82,000, respectively. Total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options outstanding at May 31, 2017 was approximately $637,000 and is to be recorded over a weighted-average life of 3.4 years.

The Corporation records all stock-based payments, including grants of stock options, in the consolidated statements of operations based on their fair values at the date of grant. The Corporation currently uses the

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 12Stock Based Compensation — (Continued)

Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by stock price as well as assumptions that include expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, expected life of the awards, risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends.

The fair value of the options granted during fiscal 2017 and 2016 were estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:

   2017  2016 

Volatility

   64.3  55.8

Risk-free interest rate

   2.14  2.22

Expected option life in years

   7.50   9.72 

Dividend yield

   0  0

Volatility is estimated based on historical volatility measured monthly for a time period equal to the expected life of the option ending on the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is determined basedIn general, these awards have graded vesting conditions in which a portion of awards vest ratably in three equal installments on observed U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the timeanniversary of the grant for maturities equivalent to the expected life of the options.vesting commencement date. The expected option life (estimated average period of time the options will be outstanding) is estimated based on the expected exercise date of the options. The expected dividend yield of zero is estimated based on the dividend yield at the time of grant as adjusted for any expected changes during the life of the options.

Restricted Stock – In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Corporation issued 15,000 sharestotal fair value of restricted stock valued atvesting was approximately $216,000. No restricted stock was vested at May 31, 2017,$2.1 million during fiscal 2020 and the non-vested shares had a$8.5 million during fiscal 2019. The weighted average grant date fair value of $14.40 per share.for restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2020 was $31.34 and in fiscal 2019 was $14.24. The weighted average grant date fair value for restricted share awards granted in fiscal 2019 was determined using the market price of the Corporation’s common stock at the date of grant. The restricted stock’s value is to be expensed over a five-year vesting period using a straight-line method. Compensation expense for fiscal 2017 was approximately $17,000, and unrecognized compensation expense at May 31, 2017 was approximately $199,000.$29.77.

 

(Units and shares in thousands)

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

 

Restricted Share Awards

 

Outstanding at March 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

158

 

 

 

349

 

Vested

 

 

 

 

 

(349

)

Outstanding at March 30, 2019

 

 

158

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

112

 

 

 

 

Vested

 

 

(75

)

 

 

 

Forfeitures

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at March 28, 2020

 

 

194

 

 

 

 


NOTE 13

14.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earningsnet income (loss) per common share is(“EPS”) attributable to the Company was computed based onby dividing net income (loss) attributable to the weighted-averageCompany by the average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The Company’s time-vesting and performance-vesting restricted share awards are considered participating securities. Diluted earnings per common share is computed based on the combinationmore dilutive of: (i) the two-class method, assuming the participating securities are not exercised or converted; or (ii) the summation of dilutive common share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under the Corporation’s Stock Incentive Plan and the weighted-average number ofaverage common shares outstanding during the reporting period.

Dilutiveand additional common share equivalents includeshares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive effectpotential common shares had been issued. During fiscal years 2020, 2019, and 2018, the two-class method was more dilutive. The number of in-the-money optionsshares used to purchase shares, which is calculatedcalculate earnings per share prior to the Exchange was determined based on the average share price for each period usingexchange ratio, as defined in the treasury stock method, as well as shares of restricted stock.

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 13Earnings Per Share — (Continued)

Exchange Agreement.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):common share:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

58,160

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

15,800

 

Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

 

 

(170

)

 

 

 

 

 

(996

)

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company's common shareholders

 

$

57,990

 

 

$

(58,208

)

 

$

14,804

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

56,516

 

 

 

53,491

 

 

 

44,491

 

Dilutive securities

 

 

246

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

 

56,762

 

 

 

53,491

 

 

 

44,491

 

Basic net income (loss) per share:

 

$

1.03

 

 

$

(1.09

)

 

$

0.33

 

Diluted net income (loss) per share:

 

$

1.02

 

 

$

(1.09

)

 

$

0.33

 

 

   Year Ended 
   May 31, 
   2017   2016 

Net income

  $5   $1,678 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average share outstanding:

    

Basic

   8,391,244    8,391,244 

Common stock equivalents—treasury stock method

   121,130     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

   8,512,374    8,391,244 

Net income per share:

    

Basic

  $.00   $.20 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted

  $.00   $.20 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

ForSecurities that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future that were considered antidilutive in the periods presented are shown below:

Type of security (in thousands)

 

March 28, 2020

 

 

March 30, 2019

 

Options

 

$

53

 

 

$

146

 

Restricted Share Units

 

 

60

 

 

 

158

 

Performance Share Units

 

 

133

 

 

 

146

 

Total dilutive securities

 

$

246

 

 

$

450

 

15.

Retirement Plans

The Company’s U.S. subsidiary sponsors a defined contribution savings plan covering most U.S. employees. Full-time employees covered by the plan are eligible to participate. Participating employees may contribute from 1% to 25% of their compensation to the plan, with the Company matching 50% of the first 6% of pay contributed. The Company match vests after three years of employment or immediately for employees age 50 and over. The Company recognized expense of $2.4 million and $0.6 million related to this plan during fiscal 20172020 and 2019, respectively.  The Company made 0 matching contributions to this plan in fiscal 2016, there were 57,9942018.

Full-time employees of the Company’s subsidiaries in Canada are generally covered by employer-sponsored defined contribution plans that require employee contributions and 13,914 anti-dilutiveemployer matching contributions. The Company recognized expense of $0.6 million in each of fiscal 2020, 2019, and 2018.


16.

Transactions with Related Parties

Prior to the Exchange, the Company was party to a Management Advisory Services Agreement (“Services Agreement”) with Centerbridge Advisors, LLC (“Centerbridge”), MAK Management L.P.(“MAK”), and Sankaty Advisors, LLC (“Bain”), collectively, the “Managers”, affiliates of which collectively owned a majority of the units of the Company and the Company’s common stock equivalents excluded from(the “Principal Shareholders”), whereby the computationPrincipal Shareholders provided management, consulting, financial and other advisory services to the Company in exchange for an annual management fee totaling $1.5 million plus reimbursable expenses. Management fee expense during fiscal 2019, recognized prior to the Exchange, was $0.3 million. The Service Agreement was terminated in connection with the Exchange. Management fee expense was $1.5 million for fiscal 2018. Management fee expense is included in SG&A expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of diluted earnings per share, respectively.operations.

NOTE 14Restructuring Activities

InOn June 1, 2018, the thirdCompany, the Principal Shareholders, Champion Holdings, and fourth quarters of fiscal 2017, the Corporationcertain other parties entered into a restructuring plan involvingregistration rights agreement providing for, among other things, customary demand registration rights, shelf registration rights and “piggyback” registration rights in favor of the suspensionPrincipal Shareholders and Arthur J. Decio. The Company registered shares for its own account and registered for sale shares held by the Principal Shareholders and others. As the result of operations ata sale of shares by the Elkhart, IndianaPrincipal Shareholders on September 25, 2018, the Principal Shareholders held less than 50% of the Company’s outstanding shares. Two of the Principal Shareholders, Bain and Mansfield, Texas facilities.Centerbridge, have sold all of their shares in the Company. The restructuring doesCompany did not representsell any shares. MAK and Arthur J. Decio continue to hold registration rights in their favor, and their shares are registered for sale.

On June 1, 2018 the Company, the Principal Shareholders and Champion Holdings entered into an investor rights agreement (the “Investor Rights Agreement”). The Investor Rights Agreement provides for, among other things, certain information rights and certain agreements relating to the composition of the Board of Directors. As the result of Bain and Centerbridge selling their holdings in the Company, they no longer meet the ownership thresholds to participate in the Investor Rights Agreement. Additionally, the Company and Champion Holdings entered into a strategic shifttransition services agreement, pursuant to which the Company provided certain services to Champion Holdings, including accounting and financial reporting services, tax services, cash and capital management services, and services relating to Champion Holdings’ members and liquidation.

17.

Segment Information

Financial results for the Company's reportable segments have been prepared using a management approach, which is consistent with the basis and manner in operations due to an expectation to have a portionwhich financial information is evaluated by the Company's chief operating decision maker in allocating resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker, the Chief Executive Officer, evaluates the performance of customersthe Company’s segment primarily based on net sales, before elimination of these two facilities serviced by manufacturing facilities located in Arkansas City, Kansasinter-company shipments, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and Sugarcreek, Ohio.amortization (“EBITDA”) and operating assets.

The suspensionCompany operates in 2 reportable segments: (i) U.S. Factory-built Housing, which includes manufacturing and retail housing operations and (ii) Canadian Factory-built Housing. Corporate/Other includes the Company’s transportation operations, corporate costs directly incurred for all segments and intersegment eliminations. Segments are generally determined by geography. Segment data includes intersegment revenues and corporate office costs that are directly and exclusively incurred for each segment. Total assets for Corporate/Other primarily include cash and certain deferred tax items not specifically allocated to another segment.


Selected financial information by reportable segment was as follows:

 

 

Year Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing

 

$

1,226,393

 

 

$

1,177,687

 

 

$

860,488

 

Canadian Factory-built Housing

 

 

84,196

 

 

 

98,567

 

 

 

96,603

 

Corporate/Other

 

 

59,141

 

 

 

83,789

 

 

 

107,631

 

Consolidated net sales

 

$

1,369,730

 

 

$

1,360,043

 

 

$

1,064,722

 

Operating income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing EBITDA

 

$

131,339

 

 

$

111,857

 

 

$

66,747

 

Canadian Factory-built Housing EBITDA

 

 

9,272

 

 

 

10,417

 

 

 

10,800

 

Corporate/Other EBITDA

 

 

(35,610

)

 

 

(135,937

)

 

 

(14,698

)

Depreciation

 

 

(13,116

)

 

 

(11,259

)

 

 

(7,773

)

Amortization

 

 

(5,430

)

 

 

(4,820

)

 

 

(487

)

Consolidated operating income (loss)

 

$

86,455

 

 

$

(29,742

)

 

$

54,589

 

Depreciation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing

 

$

11,015

 

 

$

9,507

 

 

$

6,360

 

Canadian Factory-built Housing

 

 

1,073

 

 

 

933

 

 

 

907

 

Corporate/Other

 

 

1,028

 

 

 

819

 

 

 

506

 

Consolidated depreciation

 

$

13,116

 

 

$

11,259

 

 

$

7,773

 

Amortization of intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

4,587

 

 

$

241

 

Canadian Factory-built Housing

 

 

 

 

 

233

 

 

 

246

 

Corporate/Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated amortization of intangible assets

 

$

5,430

 

 

$

4,820

 

 

$

487

 

Capital expenditures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing

 

$

11,753

 

 

$

9,494

 

 

$

7,348

 

Canadian Factory-built Housing

 

 

1,566

 

 

 

879

 

 

 

888

 

Corporate/Other

 

 

2,070

 

 

 

1,719

 

 

 

1,206

 

Consolidated capital expenditures

 

$

15,389

 

 

$

12,092

 

 

$

9,442

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

March 28,

2020

 

 

March 30,

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Factory-built Housing (1)

 

$

491,110

 

 

$

488,878

 

 

 

 

 

Canadian Factory-built Housing (1)

 

 

56,760

 

 

 

59,260

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate/Other (1)

 

 

233,830

 

 

 

151,816

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated total assets

 

$

781,700

 

 

$

699,954

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Deferred tax assets for the Canadian operations are reflected in the Canadian Factory-built Housing segment. U.S. deferred tax assets are presented in Corporate/Other because an allocation between segments is not practicable.


18.

Commitments, Contingencies, and Concentrations

Repurchase Contingencies and Guarantees

The Company is contingently liable under terms of operationsrepurchase agreements with lending institutions that provide wholesale floor plan financing to retailers. These arrangements, which are customary in Mansfield was due to the plant being unable to profitably operate since it was converted from producing recreational vehicles to manufactured housing in fiscal 2014. The suspension in Elkhart was due to the plant being unable to profitably operate since it opened in June 2016. There were neither one-time termination agreements nor material costs related to the termination of contracts such as leases related to the restructuring. Inventory and fixed asset sale and disposal losses related to the restructuring totaled $170,000 and $222,000, respectively. The Corporation does not have a liability related to the restructuring as of May 31, 2017. As referenced in Note 4, Net Gain on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment, to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the Mansfield facility was sold in the fourth quarter.

NOTE 15Treasury Stock

The Corporation’s Board of directors from time to time has authorizedindustry, provide for the repurchase of shares of the Corporation’s common stock, in the open market or through negotiated transactions, at such times and at such prices as management may decide. In fiscal 2017 and 2016, the Corporation did not acquire any shares of its common stock.

NOTE 16401(K) Plan

The Corporation has an employee savings plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that is intendedproducts sold to provide participating employees with an additional method of saving for retirement. The 401(k) Plan covers all employees who meet certain minimum participation requirements. The Corporation does not provide a matching contribution to the 401(k) Plan, but can make discretionary profit sharing contributions. No profit sharing contributions were made in fiscal 2017 and 2016.

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 17Retirement and Death Benefit Plans

The Corporation has entered into various arrangements with certain employees or former employees for benefits to be paid in the following manner:

to an employee’s estateretailers in the event of death

default by the retailer on their agreement to pay the financial institution. The risk of loss from these agreements is significantly reduced by the potential resale value of any products that are subject to repurchase and is spread over numerous retailers. The repurchase price is generally determined by the original sales price of the product less contractually defined curtailment payments. Based on these repurchase agreements and our historical loss experience, we establish an employee inassociated loss reserve which was $1.0 million at March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019. Excluding the event of retirement or disability to be paid over 10 years beginning at the date of retirement or disability

in the event of death, the employee’s beneficiary will receive the balance due the employee

The Corporation also purchased life insurance contracts on the covered employees or former employees. The presentresale value of the principal costhomes, the contingent repurchase obligation as of such arrangements is being accrued overDecember 28, 2019 was estimated to be approximately $152.7 million. Losses incurred on homes repurchased were immaterial during each of the periodfiscal years ended March 28, 2020, March 30, 2019, and March 31, 2018.

At March 28, 2020, the Company was contingently obligated for approximately $28.7 million under letters of credit, primarily consisting of $12.7 million to support long-term debt, $15.7 million to support the casualty insurance program, and $0.3 million to support bonding agreements. The letters of credit are issued under a sub-facility of the Credit Agreement. The Company was also contingently obligated for $23.7 million under surety bonds, generally to support performance on long-term construction contracts and license and service bonding requirements.

In the normal course of business, the Company’s former subsidiaries that operated in the United Kingdom historically provided certain guarantees to two customers. Those guarantees provide contractual liability for proven construction defects up to 12 years from the date of such arrangementsdelivery of certain products. The guarantees remain a contingent liability of the Company which declines over time through October 2027. As of the date of this report, the Company expects few, if any, claims to full eligibility using a discount ratebe reported under the terms of 4.0 percentthe guarantees.

Legal Proceedings

The Company has agreed to indemnify counterparties in fiscal 2017the ordinary course of its business in agreements to acquire and fiscal 2016.sell business assets and in financing arrangements. The current and non-current amounts accrued for such arrangements totaled $5,122,000 and $5,340,000 at May 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In fiscal 2017 the amount credited to operations under these arrangements was approximately $17,000. In fiscal 2016 the amount charged to operations under these arrangements was approximately $10,000.

NOTE 18Subsequent Events

On July 21, 2017, the Corporation (the “Loan Parties,” and Skyline Corporation and Skyline Homes, Inc., the “Borrowers” and each a “Borrower”) entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and other ancillary agreements and documents, including a Security Agreement and Patent and Trademark Security Agreement (collectively referred to along with the Agreement as the “Loan Documents”). Under the Agreement, Chase will provide a three-year revolving credit facility with loan advances to the Borrowers of up to a maximum of $10,000,000,Company is subject to a borrowing base set forthvarious legal proceedings and claims that arise in the Agreement (the “New Facility”). Loan advances bear interest at either 50 basis points above Chase’s floating prime rate (“CBFR”) or 150 basis points in excessordinary course of its business. As of the LIBOR rate for the applicable period (the “Adjusted LIBO Rate”). Loans are secured by the Loan Parties’ assets, now owned or hereafter acquired, except for real property and any life insurance policies owned by any Borrower on the effective date of this filing, the Agreement. Interest is payable in arrears on a monthly basisCompany believes the ultimate liability with respect to these contingent obligations will not have, either individually or in the case of the CBFR or at the end of the applicable interest rate in the case of the Adjusted LIBO Rate, and all principal and accrued but unpaid interest is due and payable at the maturity of the New Facility. Borrowers may at any time prepay in whole or in part any loan amounts, subject to minimum amounts and breakage costs.

Also under the Agreement, Chase agreed to issue letters of credit for the account of the Borrowers not to exceed $500,000. No advances have yet been made in connection with such letters of credit.

As part of the closing of the financing, the Company paid Chase a closing fee of $25,000 plus legal and due diligence costs. The Loan Parties also agreed to pay the following fees to Chase during the term of the New Facility: (i) a commitment fee payable in arrears at a rate of .25% per annum on the average daily amount of the available revolving commitment under the New Facility during the prior calendar month; and (ii) monthly letter of credit fees payable in arrears at the applicable Adjusted LIBO Rate on the outstanding amount of letters of credit issued and outstanding during the prior month.

The Loan Documents contain covenants that limit the ability of the Loan Parties to, among other things: (i) incur other indebtedness; (ii) create or incur liens on their assets; (iii) consummate asset sales, acquisitions, or mergers; (iv) pay dividends; (v) make certain investments; (vi) enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and (vii) amend a Loan Party’s articles of incorporation or bylaws.

The Agreement also requires compliance with a financial covenant involving a fixed charge coverage ratio as set forth in the Agreement.

Skyline Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

NOTE 18.Subsequent Events — (Continued)

If the Borrowers default in their obligations under the Agreement, then the unpaid balances will bear interest at 2.0% per annum in excess of the rate that would apply in the absence of a default. Other remedies available to Chase upon an event of default include the right to accelerate the maturity of all obligations, the right to foreclose on and otherwise repossess the collateral securing the obligations, and all other rights set forth in the Loan Documents.

The events of default under the Agreement include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency; (ii) failure to make required payments; (iii) misrepresentations to Chase; (iv) failure to comply with certain covenants and agreements; (v) changes in control; and (vi)aggregate, a material adverse change occurs.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of May 31, 2017, the Corporation conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of May 31, 2017, due to the material weakness described below in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

Management’s Report of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.

The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Corporation’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that the Corporation’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

ManagementConcentrations

The components and productsused in the factory-builthousing operationsare presentlyavailablefroma variety of vendors, and the Company is not dependentupon any singlesupplier.Pricesof certainmaterials,such as lumber,insulation,steeland drywall,can fluctuatesignificantlydue to changes in demand and supply. Additionally,availabilityof certainmaterials,such as drywalland insulation,has sometimesbeen limited, resultingin higherpricesand/orthe need to find alternativesuppliers.The Company generallyhas been able to pass highermaterialcostson to itscustomersin the formof surchargesand priceincreases. For fiscal2020, 2019 and 2018, salesfromthe Company’s Canadian operationswere approximately6%, 7%, and 9%, respectively,of consolidatedsales. The Company’s net assets in Canada totaledapproximately$45.0 million and $41.6 million at March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, respectively.

The Company has approximately 6,600 employees. The Company’s manufacturing facilities in Canada employ approximately 700 workers, and most of the Corporation has assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on criteria establishedworkers belong to trade associations that operate under collective bargaining agreements. There are 5 collective bargaining agreements (one for each Canadian plant) and each have separate expiration dates. One agreement expired in the 2013Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting,November 2019 and testing of the operational effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financing reporting. Based on this assessment, management identified a material weaknessis still under renegotiation, two agreements are set to expire in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2017 as it relatesJune 2020, one agreement is set to the accuracyexpire in November 2021, and valuation of raw

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures — (Continued)

Management’s Report of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting  — (Continued)

one agreement is set to expire in November 2022.

 

materials and inventories. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.


19.

Summary Quarterly Financial Data(Unaudited)

The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment. The Corporation’s internal controls over the accuracy and valuation of raw materials inventories did not operate with sufficient precision to prevent or detect a the potential occurrence of material misstatement in compiling the raw material inventory listing from the physical inventory counts or in the valuation of raw materials at cost under the first-in, first-out method.

The Corporation’s internal control overtable presents summary unaudited quarterly financial reporting as of May 31, 2017 has been audited by Crowe Horwath LLP, an independent registered accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears herein.data:

 

 

Fiscal 2020

 

 

Fiscal 2019

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

First Quarter

 

 

Second Quarter

 

 

Third Quarter

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

371,888

 

 

$

354,458

 

 

$

342,239

 

 

$

301,145

 

 

$

322,261

 

 

$

355,436

 

 

$

354,671

 

 

$

327,675

 

Gross profit

 

 

76,035

 

 

 

74,055

 

 

 

68,901

 

 

 

59,984

 

 

 

55,160

 

 

 

59,000

 

 

 

64,736

 

 

 

66,463

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

17,380

 

 

 

17,745

 

 

 

17,037

 

 

 

5,998

 

 

 

(853

)

 

 

(77,025

)

 

 

10,513

 

 

 

9,157

 

Per share data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic income (loss) per share

 

 

0.31

 

 

 

0.31

 

 

 

0.30

 

 

 

0.11

 

 

 

(0.02

)

 

 

(1.42

)

 

 

0.19

 

 

 

0.16

 

Diluted income (loss) per share

 

 

0.31

 

 

 

0.31

 

 

 

0.30

 

 

 

0.11

 

 

 

(0.02

)

 

 

(1.42

)

 

 

0.19

 

 

 

0.16

 

In order to remediate the material weakness described above, the Corporation is currently evaluating improvements in internal controls over the accuracy and valuation of raw materials inventory and will implement those improvements as soon as practicable in fiscal 2018.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As of May 31, 2017, management, with the participation of the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that no changes in internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended May 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect materially, internal control over financial reporting, except as noted above with respect to the accuracy and valuation of raw materials inventory.

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications

The Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017. In addition, on September 26, 2016, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer certified to NYSE American that he was not aware of any violation by the Corporation of the NYSE American corporate governance listing standards as in effect on September 19, 2016. The foregoing certification was unqualified.

 

Item 9B.Other Information.

None

PART III

 


Item 10.

Skyline Champion Corporation

Directors, Executive Officers

Schedule II--Valuation and Corporate Governance.Qualifying Accounts

(in millions)

Directors and Corporate Governance

The information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K regarding the Corporation’s directors and the nominees for election as directors of the Corporation at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on September 29, 2017 (the “2017 Annual Meeting”) is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the captions “Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors” and “Director Qualifications and Biographical Information” in the Corporation’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting (the “2017 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the Corporation’s fiscal year ended May 31, 2017.

The information required by Item 407(c)(3) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the caption “Corporate Governance — Committees” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The information required by Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

Code of Ethics

The Corporation has Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics which apply to all employees, officers and directors. These Codes of Ethics are posted to Skyline’s website at www.skylinecorp.com and are available in paper form upon request to the Skyline Secretary.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The information required by Item 407(d)(4) and (d)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the caption “Corporate Governance – Committees” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

 

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

The information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the caption “Executive Compensation” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in Part II, Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Security Ownership

The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the captions “Security Ownership of Management” and “Security Ownership of Certain Other Beneficial Owners” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

The information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the caption “Executive Compensation — Transactions With Related Persons” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

Director Independence

The information required by Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the caption “Director Independence and Executive Sessions” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference herein from the disclosures included under the captions “Corporate Governance — Audit Fees,” “— Audit-Related Fees,” “— Tax Fees,” and “— All Other Fees” in the 2017 Proxy Statement.

PART IV

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)(1) Financial Statements

Financial statements for the Corporation are listed in the index under Item 8 of this document.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not material or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(a)(3) Index to Exhibits

Exhibits (Numbered according to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, Exhibit Table)

    2.1Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 7, 2014 between Evergreen Recreational Vehicles, LLC and Skyline Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 10, 2014).
    2.2Real Property Purchase Agreement dated October 7, 2014 between Sky RE Holding LLC and Skyline Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 10, 2014).
    3.1Articles of Incorporation of Skyline Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the registrant’s Current Report filed on Form 10-K Filed on August 26, 2015).
    3.2Amended and Restated By-Laws of Skyline Corporation (Amended and Restated as of June 1, 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 17, 2017).
  10.1Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 26, 2014).
  10.2Credit Agreement dated July 21, 2017 between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Skyline Corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Homette Corporation, Layton Homes Corp., and Skyline Homes, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2017).
  10.3Security Agreement dated July 21, 2017 between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Skyline Corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Homette Corporation, Layton Homes Corp., and Skyline Homes, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2017).
  10.4Patent and Trademark Security Agreement dated July 21, 2017 between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Skyline Corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Homette Corporation, Layton Homes Corp., and Skyline Homes, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2017).
  10.5Disclosure Certificate dated July 21, 2017 between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Skyline Corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Homette Corporation, Layton Homes Corp., and Skyline Homes, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2017).
  10.6Real Estate Purchase Agreement dated February 24, 2017 between Skyline Corporation and Champion Home Builders, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2017).
  10.7Novation and Amendment of Contract dated February 28, 2017 between Skyline Corporation, Champion Home Builders, Inc. and Homette Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2017).
  10.8Executive Employment Agreement dated June 25, 2015 between Richard Florea and Skyline Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the registrant’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on June 30, 2015).*

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.  — (Continued).

  10.91989 Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended and Restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2015, filed on April 3, 2015).*
  10.10Skyline Corporation 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the registrant’s Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on October 15, 2015).*
  21Subsidiaries of Skyline Corporation.
  23Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
  31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
  32Certification of Periodic Financial Reports Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101The following materials from the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2017 formatted in an XBRL Interactive Data File: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Retained Earnings; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, with detailed tagging of notes and financial statement schedules.

*This exhibit is a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Balance at Beginning of Period

 

 

Additions

 

 

Deductions

 

 

Other

 

 

Balance at End of Period

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 28, 2020:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

0.6

 

 

$

0.7

 

 

$

(0.9

)

 

-

 

 

$

0.4

 

Valuation allowance for deferred taxes

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

(0.4

)

(a)

 

11.2

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 30, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

0.2

 

 

$

0.5

 

 

$

(0.1

)

 

-

 

 

$

0.6

 

Valuation allowance for deferred taxes

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

1.9

 

(b)

 

7.3

 

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

0.9

 

 

$

0.1

 

 

$

(0.8

)

 

-

 

 

$

0.2

 

Valuation allowance for deferred taxes

 

 

15.0

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

(8.9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

SKYLINE CORPORATION(a)Represents a decrease due to provision-to-return adjustments

Registrant(b)Represents an increase in valuation allowance for deferred taxes related to a business combination.

BY:/s/    Richard W. Florea
Richard W. Florea
Chief Executive Officer

DATE:August 3, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

BY: 

/s/    Jon S. Pilarski

Jon S. Pilarski

Vice President, Finance & Treasurer,

Chief Financial Officer

August 3, 2017
BY 

/s/    Martin R. Fransted

Martin R. Fransted

Corporate Controller and SecretaryAugust 3, 2017
BY: 

/s/    Arthur J. Decio

Arthur J. Decio

Director

August 3, 2017

BY: 

/s/    John C. Firth

John C. Firth

Non-Executive Chairman of the BoardAugust 3, 2017
BY: 

/s/    Jerry Hammes

Jerry Hammes

Director

August 3, 2017

BY: 

/s/    William H. Lawson

William H. Lawson

DirectorAugust 3, 2017
BY: 

/s/    David T. Link

David T. Link

Director

August 3, 2017

BY: 

/s/    John W. Rosenthal Sr.

John W. Rosenthal Sr.

Director

August 3, 2017

BY: 

/s/    Samuel S. Thompson

Samuel S. Thompson

DirectorAugust 3, 2017

 

48

F-33