UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM10-K

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31 2017, 2023

OR

For the transition period fromto

Commission File Number001-08499

CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(401)435-7171

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)code: (401) 435-7171

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)12 (g) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐No☒

Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T (Section (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of RegulationS-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of the “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated" "accelerated filer,”“non-accelerated filer,” “smaller" "smaller reporting company”company" and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2017,2023, the aggregate market value of the Class A voting stock held bynon-affiliates of the Company was $29,700,000,$23,000,000 which excludes voting stock held by directors, executive officers and holders of 5% or more of the voting power of the Company’s common stock (without conceding that such persons are “affiliates” of the Company for purposes of federal securities laws). The Company has no outstandingnon-voting common equity.

As of March 1, 2018,February 16, 2024, the Company had 6,599,912 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding.

CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC.

FORM10-K

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20172023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain portions of this report, and particularly the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Sections 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Sections 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events. The Company cautions that these statements are further qualified by important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the following: the ability of the Company to generate adequate amounts of cash; the collectibilitycollectability of the accrued leasing revenuesexcess of straight-line over contractual rent when due over the terms of the long-term land leases and the early termination of the Parcel 6C land lease;leases; the commencement of additional long-term land leases; changes in economic conditions that may affect either the current or future development on the Company’s parcels; cyber-penetrations; the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy, parking operations, and the Company’s financial performance, and exposure to remediation and other costs associated with its former ownership of a petroleum storage facility. The Company does not undertake the obligation to update forward-looking statements in response to new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 1. Business

Organizational History

The Company was organized as a business corporation under the laws of Rhode Island in 1983 as Providence and Worcester Company and is the successor by merger in 1983 to a corporation also named Providence and Worcester Company which was organized under the laws of Delaware in 1979. In 1984, the Company’s name was changed to Capital Properties, Inc.

SegmentsBusiness:

Prior to December 20, 2016, the Company operated in two segments: leasing and petroleum storage. On December 20, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the sale of the Company’s petroleum storage facility and related assets, including the Wilkesbarre Pier and petroleum transmission pipelines owned or controlled by the Company’s subsidiaries, Capital Terminal Company and Dunellen, LLC to Sprague Operating Resources, LLC, a subsidiary of Sprague Resources LP (collectively referred to as “Sprague”), for a purchase price of $23 Million (subject to certain adjustments) resulting in the petroleum storage business (the “Petroleum Segment”) being classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. On January 24, 2017, the Company entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement with Sprague (the “Sale Agreement”) and the transaction was consummated on February 10, 2017. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Board’s decision to authorize the sale of the Petroleum Segment to Sprague, which had been exclusively leasing the petroleum storage facility and related assets since May 1, 2014, was based on an evaluation of the Petroleum Segment’s economic future as solely a distillate terminal and the significant capital investment and substantial risk related to converting a significant portion of the petroleum storage facility to gasoline in order to increase revenue. The Board concluded that a sale to Sprague was in the best interest of the Company’s shareholders. As a result of the sale of its petroleum storage and related assets, the Company’s operations are limited to leasing its real estate interests.

Leasing Business

Capital Center

The Company’s principal business is the leasing of Company-owned land in the Capital Center area (“Capital Center”) and property adjacent to Capital Center (Parcel 20) in downtown Providence, Rhode Island under long-term ground leases.leases with terms of 99 years or more.* (Hereinafter, the land in Capital Center and Parcel 20 are referred to as parcels within the “Capital Center Area”). The Company owns approximately 18 acres in the Capital Center consisting of 13 individual parcels. The Capital Center (approximately 77 acres of land) is the result of a development project undertaken by the State of Rhode Island, the City of Providence, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) and the Company during the 1980’s in which two rivers, the Moshassuck and the Woonasquatucket, were moved, Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor rail line was relocated, a new Amtrak/commuter railroad station was constructed and significant public improvements were made to improve pedestrian and vehicular traffic in the area.

With the exception of the Steeple Street property (see Parcel 20 defined below), the The Company has not acted, and does not intend to act, as a developer with respect to any improvements constructed on Company-owned parcels. Rather,

Under the Company offers individual parcelsCompany’s standard Ground Leases, the tenant is responsible for lease pursuant to long-term ground leasesall property related operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, maintenance and insurance as well as all costs associated with termsthe development and construction of 99 years or more.the related improvements. Each leaseGround Lease contains provisions permitting the tenant to develop the parcel under certain terms and conditions. Each leaseconditions and provides for periodic rent adjustments of various kinds. Under the leases,increases based on either a specific percentage, consumer price index (“CPI”), appraisal or combination thereof and sometimes includes percentage rent participation (contingent rent). The Ground Leases also provide that the tenants are responsible for insuring the Company against various hazards and events. Each tenant is required to indemnifyevents as well as indemnifying the Company with respect to all of the tenant’s activities on the land. The leasesGround Leases contain other terms and conditions customary to such instruments.

The Company first began offering parcels for lease in the Capital Center area in the late 1980’s. As of December 31, 2017, nine parcels within the Capital Center area have been leased by the Company under long-term leases of 99 years or more. Of the nine parcels, eight have improvements constructed thereon or under construction as follows:

While seeking developers, the Company also leases Parcels 3E, 3W, 4E, 4W and 4Wa portion of Parcel 20 in the Capital Center areaArea for public parking purposes on a short-term basis to Metropark, Ltd.

Parcel 20

Parcel 20 Adjacent to the Capital Center

Since the 1980’s, the Company has owned an undevelopedconsists of a parcel of land adjacent to the Capital Center, part of which is leased out for public parking purposes on a short-term basis. In 2007, the Company purchased the adjacent parcel containingundeveloped and part of which contains a three/four-story 18,00020,000 square foot building (the “Steeple Street Building”) and related land for $2,329,000, which, together with the previously-owned land, now comprises Parcel 20, containing 26,600 square feet. The Steeple Street Building is on the State Registry of Historic Buildings. During 2010-2011, the Company substantially rehabilitated the Steeple Street Building. The Steeple Street Building has four commercial tenants with additional space available for lease..

On September 28, 2017January 25, 2024, the Company entered into a long-term ground lease of Parcel 20. Under the terms of the lease, tenanttenant's possession will not occur until such time as the tenant has received all necessary approvals for construction of not less than 100,000 square feet of mixed use improvements. Prior to transfer of possession, no rent is being paid by the tenant and the Company receives all rents from existing tenants and parking lease revenue and remains responsible for all expenses, including real estate taxes, related to Parcel 20. Following tenanttenant's possession, tenant is obligated not only to pay ground rent for the parcel but alsoand to pay the Company an additional amount for twenty years to compensate the Company forpurchase the building presently located on the premises.    premises for an additional amount payable monthly over twenty years.

*Generally speaking, a ground lease is a lease by the owner of the land (in this case, the Company) to the owners/operators of the real estate improvements built thereon by such owners/operators (“Ground Leases”).

All of the properties described above are shown on athe map contained in Exhibit 20.

LamarBillboard Lease

The Company, through aits wholly-owned subsidiary Tri-State Displays, Inc. leases 23 outdoor advertising locations containing 44 billboard faces along interstate and primary highways in Rhode Island and Massachusetts to Lamar Outdoor Advertising, LLC (“Lamar”) under a lease which expires in 2045.2053 (the “Lamar Lease”). All but one of these locations are controlled by the Company through permanent easements granted to the Company pursuant to an agreement between the Company and the Providence & Worcester Railroad Company (“Railroad”); the remaining location is leased by the Company from a third party with a remaining term of two years.

Although no new locations have been added since 2002, in 2013 Lamar converted billboards at two locations to electronic boards, which conversions extended the term of the lease for a total of twelve years to 2045. Lamar has a right of first refusal for additional billboard location sites acquired by the Company in New England and Metropolitan New York City.

The Lamar lease with Lamar provides, among other things, for the following: (1) theannual base rent increases annually at the rate of 2.75% in June for each leased billboard location commencing June 1, 2006 and onparticipation in the revenue generated by each June 1 thereafter; and (2)billboard, as defined in addition to base rent, for each12-month period commencing each June 1, Lamar must pay to the Company 30% of the gross revenues from each standard billboard and 20% of the gross revenues from each electronic billboard for such12-month period, reduced by the sum of (a) commissions paid to third parties and (b) the base monthly rent for each leased billboard display for such12-month period.agreement. The Lamar lease contains other terms and conditions customary to such instruments.

A summary of the long-term leases which have commenced is as follows:

Major tenants:

The following table sets forth those major tenants whose revenues exceed 10 percent of the Company’s leasing revenues for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016:2022:

Competition

Competition

The Company competes for tenants with other owners of undeveloped real property in downtown Providence. The Company maintains no listing of other competitive properties and will not engage in a competitive bid arrangement with proposed developers. The Company’s refusal to sell the land that it owns may restrict the number of interested developers. As to the Steeple Street Building, the Company competes for tenants with other office and commercial buildings located in downtown Providence.

Employees

As of December 31, 2023, the Company has two full-time and one part-time employee.

Environmental

Prior to February 2017, the Company has four employees.

Discontinued Operations

Terminal and Pier Facility

Prior tooperated a petroleum storage facility (“Terminal”) through two of its wholly owned subsidiaries. On February 10, 2017, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Dunellen,Terminal was sold to Sprague Operating Resources, LLC (“Dunellen”Sprague”) and Capitalwhich results in the Terminal’s operations being classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. As part of the Terminal Company, owned and operated a petroleum storage terminal containing 1,004,000 shell barrels (the “Terminal”) and the Wilkesbarre Pier (the “Pier”), collectively referred to as the “Facility,” located in East Providence, Rhode Island. The Terminal utilized the Pier and two 16” pipelines connecting the Pier to the Terminal. During 2016, the Facility was leased to Sprague pursuant to a lease dated May 1, 2014. Sprague paid an annual rent of $3,500,000 andSale Agreement, the Company paid substantially all ofagreed to complete the operatingenvironmental remediation and pay for the costs related to the Facility. In April 2016, as permitted by the lease, Sprague gave Dunellen notice of its intention to terminate the lease effective May 1, 2017. In January 2017, the Company took title to the pipelines and the related easement from Getty Properties Corp. (“Getty”). Getty also conveyed to Dunellen all of its interest in and to the Pier. As noted above, on February 10, 2017, the Company sold the Terminal, the Pier and related facilities, including the pipelines, to Sprague. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Environmental

Ina 1994 a leak was discovered in a storage tank at the Terminalfuel oil leak which allowed the escape of a small amount of fuel oil. Since that time,In February 2020, the Company and its consultants have continued to workedfiled a revised Remediation Action Work Plan (“RAWP”) with the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (“RIDEM”) throughto incorporate technical details associated with the various phases ofpreferred remedial activities and to update the 2018 RAWP. During 2022, the remediation and are now workingsystem was modified to completeaddress operational issues which impeded remediation activities. For the final remediation plan. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement with Sprague and related documentation,year ended December 31, 2023, the Company is required to secure an approvedincurred costs of $79,000 of which $4,000 was charged against the environmental remediation plan and to remediate this contaminated siteaccrual resulting in a liability of $402,000 at its expense. At December 31, 2016,2023 with the Company accrued an additional $385,000balance charged to cover these costs, bringing the total accrual for the cost of remediation to $459,000. During 2017, remediation costs of $25,000 were incurred which reduced the total accrual to $434,000.other liabilities. Any subsequent increases or decreases to the expected cost of remediation will be recorded in the Company’s consolidated income statementstatements as incomegain or expense fromloss on sale of discontinued operations.

Insurance

The Company maintains what management believes to be adequate levels of insurance.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Risk Management

The Company’s corporate information technology, communication networks, and accounting and financial reporting platforms are necessary for the operation of its business. The Company uses these systems, along with others, to manage its tenant and vendor relationships, for internal and external communications and for accounting to operate recordkeeping and reporting functions. The Company has implemented and maintains various information security processes designed to identify, assess and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats to its critical computer networks, third-party hosted services, communications systems, hardware and software, and our critical data, including confidential information.

Management works primarily with third parties (principally professional services and consulting firms) that assist management in identifying, assessing, and managing cybersecurity risks. To operate its business, the Company utilizes certain third-party service providers to perform a variety of functions and seeks to engage reliable, reputable service providers that maintain cybersecurity programs. The Company is not aware of any risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any cybersecurity incidents, which have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect it, including its business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition.

Governance:

The Board of Directors oversees the Company’s strategy and risk management, including material risks related to cybersecurity threats. The Board has delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of cybersecurity matters.

Management is responsible for day-to-day assessment and management of cybersecurity risks. The Treasurer has primary oversight of material risks from cybersecurity threats and works primarily with third parties to identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks. The Treasurer meets with the Audit Committee periodically to review the Company’s information technology systems and discuss key cybersecurity risks.

Item 2. Properties

The Company owns approximately 18 acres and a historic building in and adjacent to the Capital Center District inArea of Providence, Rhode Island. AllWith the exception of Parcel 6C and the Steeple Street Building, all of the Company’s real property and a portion of the building areis leased either under long-term leases or short-term leases as more particularly described in Item 1, Leasing Business. The Company also owns or controls 23 locations in Rhode Island and Massachusetts on which 44 billboard faces have been constructed. All but one of these locations are owned by the Company under permanent easements from the Railroad; the remaining location is leased from an unrelated third party with a remaining term of two years.

As of December 31, 2016, the Company also owned the Pier and an approximate10-acre site in East Providence, Rhode Island on which there are located nine petroleum storage tanks, related distribution racks and a single-story office building which housed the Company’s headquarters and other support operations. On December 20, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In connection with the sale of these propertiesthe Company’s petroleum storage terminal in 2017, the Company and Sprague entered into an agreement relating to Sprague. Accordingly, these propertiesthe construction of a breasting dolphin pursuant to which any construction costs incurred in excess of the contract cost of the construction would be shared equally between the Company and Sprague subject to certain limitations. In November 2019, Sprague asserted that it was owed $427,000 and the Company asserted that its obligation under the Agreement could not exceed $104,000. Mediation efforts were reclassified as “Assets heldunsuccessful and in July 2021, Sprague commenced an action against the Company in the Rhode Island Superior Court (Superior Court) seeking monetary damages of $427,000, interest and attorney’s fees. In December 2022, the Superior Court denied Sprague’s Motion for sale” onSummary Judgment filed in September 2022 and granted in part and denied in part the Consolidated Balance SheetsCompany’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment also filed in September 2022. The Company anticipates that the year ended December 31, 2016.matter will go to trial within the next six months. The properties were soldCompany intends to Sprague on February 10, 2017. See “Discontinued Operations” above and Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements.vigorously defend against the claims being asserted by Sprague.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure – Not applicable

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

The Company’s Class A Common Stock is traded on the OTCQX, symbol “CPTP.” The following table shows the high and low trading prices for the Company’s Class A Common Stock during the quarterly periods indicated as obtained from the OTCQX, together with cash dividends paid per share during such periods.

At March 1, 2018,February 16, 2024, there were395were 322 holders of record of the Company’s Class A Common Stock.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U. S. GAAP)GAAP”). The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations excludes the results of our discontinued operations unless otherwise noted. See Note 8, Discontinued Operations9, “Discontinued operations and Subsequent Eventenvironmental incident” in the accompanying consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these operations.

Critical accounting policies:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has issued guidance for the disclosure of “critical accounting policies.” The SEC defines such policies as those that require application of management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 toin the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. Not all of these significant accounting policies require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates. Management believes that the Company’s revenue recognition policy for long-term leases with scheduled rent increases meets the SEC definition of “critical.”

Certain of theThe Company’s long-term land leases (land and billboard) have original terms of 30 to 149 years and contain scheduled rent increases where the future dollar increases are known at the time of the commencement of the lease or at a subsequent date.

years. The first such lease commenced in 1988, had an original term of 99 years and provides for fixed percentage increases at specified intervals (as well as reappraisal increases). In accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)Company follows GAAP in accounting for its leases by recognizing rental income related toon the fixed percentage increases that are presently known should be recognizedstraight-line basis over the term of the leases. Where the straight-line income exceeds the actual contractual payments (“Excess”), the Company evaluates the collectability of the entire stream of remaining lease payments on a straight-linelease-by-lease basis. To calculate the annual straight-line amount, the 99 known annual rental amounts are totaled and this total is divided by 99.

In 2009, a scheduled appraisal occurred, resulting in a rental increase. The Company recalculated the future annual straight-line amount usingIf the remaining years underlease payments are not deemed to be probable of collection, in accordance with GAAP, lease revenue is recorded at the lease. The turnaround date discussed below did not change.

For this lease, the calculated annuallower of straight-line amount for 1988 was eight times (multiple) the amount paid by the tenant under the terms of the lease (the “contractual amount”). In subsequent years, as the tenant pays higher rents, the multiple gradually decreases until the 57^th year of the lease, at which timerental income or the contractual amount paid bypaid.

The number of years remaining on the tenant will exceed the calculated straight-line amount. If the Company wereCompany’s leases range from twenty-six (26) years to report annual revenue for this lease using the straight-line amount, it would record a significant receivable for each of the first 56one hundred-thirty (130) years which receivable would grow to approximately $34,000,000. Management does not believe that the Company should record a receivable that would not beginwith total rents yet to be collected untilfrom tenants (without regard to CPI and appraisal adjustments) under the 56^th year (the “turnaround date”) since management could notlease ranging from $19.2 million to $363.0 million. Given the length of the remaining lease term and the magnitude of the amount yet to be assured of collection.

In 1988, management metcollected, along with the SEC accounting staff to discuss its concerns in applying GAAPconsideration of other factors, the Company has concluded that the remaining stream of lease payments is not probable of collection and as it related to asuch, reports lease of this length which results in the recording of such a significant receivable that would remainrevenue based on the Company’s balance sheet and continue to grow on an annual basis with a turnaround date so far in the future. The Company presented the SEC accounting staff with an application of the accounting policy whereby management would evaluate the collectibility of the receivable on an annual basis and report as leasing revenue only that portion of the receivable that management could presently conclude would be collectible. The SEC accounting staff did not object to this application by the Company.

Through December 31, 2017, the receivable on this lease has grown to $23,885,000 (cumulative excess of straight-line over contractual rentals) and management has not been able to conclude that any portion is collectible as the turnaround date is still 28 years away.

In 2004, a second such lease commenced with an original term of 149 years and provides for fixed minimum percentage increases at specified intervals (as well as reappraisal increases). For this lease, the contractual amount paid by the tenant will not exceed the calculated straight-line amount until the 94^th year of the lease. Through December 31, 2017, the receivable on this lease is $30,844,000 (cumulative excess of straight-line over contractual rentals)paid.

In 2006, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement of its lease with Lamar Outdoor Advertising LLC (“Lamar”). In 2013, the lease was extended to 2045 following the conversion of billboards at two locations to electronic boards, as required by the lease, resulting in a current remaining term of 30 years which provides for fixed percentage increases annually. For this lease, the contractual amount paid by Lamar will not exceed the calculated straight-line amount until the 23rd year of the extended lease. Through December 31, 2017, the receivable on this lease is $2,788,000 (cumulative excess of straight-line over contractual rentals) and management has not been able to conclude that any portion is collectible as the turnaround date is 12 years away.

Accordingly, the Company has not reported any portion of these amounts as leasing revenue in its consolidated financial statements and does not anticipate that it can reach such a conclusion until the turnaround dates are closer. Although the Company’s other long-term land leases provide for scheduled rent increases, the provisions of the leases are such that certain future dollar amounts could not be calculated either at the time of the commencement of the lease or now, as such amounts are based on factors that are not presently known, i.e., futurecost-of-living adjustments or future appraised values. Through December 31, 2017, the receivable on these leases is $16,120,000 and management has not been able to conclude that any portion is collectible as the turnaround dates are approximately 43 years away.    

Historically, the Company generates adequate liquidity to fund its operations.

Cash and cash commitments:

At December 31, 2017, theThe Company had cash and cash equivalents of $5,202,000. At$652,000 and $1,476,000 at December 31, 2017, cash equivalents consist2023 and 2022, respectively, inclusive of United Stateszero-coupon treasury bills due March 2018a money market account totaling $2,993,000. At December 31, 2016,$461,000 and $1,273,000 in each of the Company had no cash equivalents. aforementioned years. Additional sources of funds to fund operations include investments that mature in April 2024 totaling $1,244,000 along with a $2,000,000 unused line of credit (see Note 6 in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company and its three subsidiary companies each maintain a checking accounts and one money market account in the same bank; the aggregate of each Company’s accountsa financial institution which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to a maximum of $250,000. The Company periodically evaluates the financial stability of the financial institutioninstitutions at which the Company’s funds are held.

Under the terms of theeach applicable long-term land lease, on Parcel 2, the contractual rent willadjustments for the last two years were:

The City of Providence (“City”) conducted a City-wide property revaluation for 2022. This revaluation increased the assessed value of the Company’s parcels that are available for lease by 26.5%, resulting in an annual property tax increase of $139,000 that was to be adjustedborne entirely by the Company. The Company's appeal of the assessed values for certain of its parcels was successful and resulted in May 2018 by a costreduction of living adjustmentthe assessed value to an amount less than the 2021 assessed value and in an annual property tax reduction in 2022 taxes as providedoriginally assessed of $165,000, which amount was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2022.

Through February 16, 2024 all tenants have paid their monthly rent in accordance with their lease agreement.agreements.

On

The COVID-19 pandemic had an adverse impact on Metropark’s parking operations as the move by many companies to a hybrid workplace model (one that mixes in-office and remote work) resulted in lower demand for parking spaces. From June 2020 through December 31, 2023 the Company and Metropark operated under a Revenue Sharing Agreement, dated June 30, 2020, that provided for revenue sharing at various percentages until parking revenues received by Metropark equal or exceed $70,000 per month whereupon Metropark would be obligated to resume regularly scheduled rental payments under its lease. During this time, revenue was recognized on a cash basis with the difference between the regularly scheduled rental payments and amounts paid ("deferred rent") recorded as an accounts receivable and was fully reserved.

In January 2024, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to its Lease Agreement whereby Metropark agreed to return to a fixed monthly rental payment of $57,000 per month effective January 1, 2024 subject to adjustment in accordance with the Lease Agreement. Additionally, the Company and Metropark settled the Company’s claim for deferred rent for all prior periods which amounted to $1,127,000 (fully reserved on the Company’s books) for $150,000 payable by Metropark in twenty (20) equal quarterly installments commencing on April 1, 2017,2024 together with interest on the scheduled annual contractual rent on Parcel 7A increased $10,000 and will increase by a likeunpaid balance in the amount over the following four years.

On April 1, 2016, under the terms of the long-term land lease on Parcel 9, the scheduled annual contractual rent increased $18,000.

4.73% per annum. At December 31, 2017,2023, the Company has four tenants occupying 49 percent of the Steeple Street Building under short-term leases (five years or less) at a current total annual rental of $95,000. The Company$150,000 settlement is currently marketing the remaining portions of the building for lease.

On February 24, 2017, the Company issued a notice of mandatory redemption of the entire remaining outstanding balance of its Dividend Notes. The principal balance plus accrued interest to the date of redemption was $10,764,000. The Company received $19,794,000 from the sale of its petroleum storage business after giving effect to escrows, a credit to Sprague for the cost of constructing a turning dolphin adjacent to the Pier,included in Prepaid and other customary closing costs. and in Leasing revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of income and retained earnings.

The cash outlay for federal and state income taxes arising from the sale totaled $6,503,000. Most of the remaining proceeds from the sale were used to effect the redemption of the Dividend Notes on March 31, 2017.

Pursuant to theTerminal Sale Agreement and related documentation provides that the Company is required at its expense, to secure an approved remediation plan and to remediate contamination caused by a 1994 leak in 1994 from a 25,000 barrel storage tank at the Terminal. At December 31, 2023, the Company’s accrual for the remaining cost of remediation was $402,000 of which $132,000 is expected to be expended in 2024. The Terminal Sale Agreement also contained a cost sharing provision for a breasting dolphin whereby any construction costs in excess of the contract cost of construction would be borne equally by Sprague and the Company subject to certain limitations, including, in the Company’s opinion, a 20% cap on the increase from the initial estimate subject to the sharing arrangement. In November 2019, Sprague asserted that it was owed $427,000 and the Company asserted that its obligation under the Agreement could not exceed $104,000. Mediation efforts were unsuccessful and in July 2021, Sprague commenced an action against the Company in the Rhode Island Superior Court (Superior Court) seeking monetary damages of $427,000, plus interest and attorney’s fees. In December 2022, the Superior Court denied Sprague’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed in September 2022 and granted in part and denied in part the Company’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment also filed in September 2022. The Company anticipates that the matter will go to trial within the next six months. The Company intends to vigorously defend against the claims being asserted by Sprague. See Note 6, “Petroleum storage facility9, “Discontinued operations and environmental incident” toin the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. At December 31, 2016,

In 2023, the Company accrued an additional $385,000 to cover these costs, bringing the total accrual for the costdeclared and paid dividends of remediation to $459,000. During 2017, remediation costs of $25,000 where incurred which reduced the total accrual to $434,000. The Company is in the process of preparing a final remediation plan for submission to the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management.$1,848,000 or $0.28 per share.

At its regularly scheduled quarterly Board meeting held October 25, 2017 and January 24, 2018, the Board of Directors voted to declare a regular quarterly dividend of $.07 per share for shareholders of record on December 15, 2017 and March 1, 2018, payable January 3, 2018 and March 15, 2018, respectively.

The declaration of future dividends will depend on future earnings and financial performance.

At December 31, 2017, the Company has nonon-cancellable contract obligations other than one operating lease for a billboard location for which the rent expense is not material.

Year Ended December 31, 20172023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162022:

Continuing operations:

RevenuesLeasing revenue increased $450,000 from continuing operations increased $129,000 from 2016 due to scheduled increases in rent under long-term land leases and increases under short-term leases, offset in part by a decrease in contingent rent under the Lamar lease. Operating expenses increased $479,0002022 due principally to a review of tenant compliance with the insurance requirements provided in the long-term land leases ($187,000), legal costs associated with review of potential development opportunities on the Company’s available parcels and the eviction of a Steeple Street tenant due to nonpayment of rent and common area charges ($75,000), bad debt expense ($64,000) in connection with the evicted tenant and an increase in repairscash collections from Metropark along with the $150,000 deferred rent settlement ($315,000) and maintenance ata net increase in rent (contractual and contingent) from tenants ($135,000).

Operating expenses decreased $40,000 in 2023 as there were no professional fees associated with the Steeple Street Building ($61,000).property tax appeal that occurred in 2022.

General and administrative expense increased $762,000$57,000 due principally to an increase in payroll and payroll related costs associated with severance paid to the Company’s former Vice-President ($193,000), a bonus related to the successful completion of the Sprague sale ($50,000) to the Company’s former treasurer along with a supplemental retirement benefit in recognition of her years of service ($200,000) and the addition of two employees ($273,000).costs.

For the yearyears ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016, interest expense on the dividend notes was $112,000 and $578,000, respectively. In June 2016, the Company redeemed 10 percent of the face value of the Dividend Notes.Following the sale of2022, the Company’s petroleum storage business, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding Dividend Notes on March 31, 2017.

Discontinued operations:

The sale of the Petroleum Segment described above results in the segment being classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. For 2017, revenues and operating expenses reflect the results of operations through the date of sale (February 10, 2017) verses a full year of activity in 2016. Revenues for 2017 are less than the revenue earned from the same time frame in 2016 due principally to an adjustment of $50,000 related to the recognition of revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the Sprague lease. Operating expenses for 2017 include bonuses totaling $426,000 paid to the Company’s former Vice President and Petroleum Segment employees for the successful completion of the sale to Sprague and for their dedicated service along with increased professional fees associated with the Sprague sale.

Income Taxes:

On December 22, 2017, the United States enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) which, among other things, lowered the U.S. Federal corporateeffective income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The Company recorded a net tax benefit to reflect the impact of the Act as of December 31, 2017, as itcontinuing operations is required to reflect the change in the period in which the law is enacted. The benefits recorded in 2017 related to the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities which resulted in a deferred tax benefit of $406,000.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESSUSIDIARY

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Capital Properties, Inc.

East Providence, Rhode Island

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Capital Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the related consolidated statements of income and retained earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2017,2023, in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Revenue Recognition – Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company derives revenue from long-term leases with original terms ranging from 30 years to 149 years. Effective January 1, 2019 the Company adopted ASC 842, Leases, and elected the “package of practical expedients” which permits the Company not to reassess under the new standard prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification, and initial indirect costs and determined that all pre-existing leases were properly accounted for as operating. The long-term leases contain periodic rent increases based on either a specific percentage, market appraisals, changes in the consumer price index or combination thereof. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, lease income should be recognized on a straight-line basis. Where

straight-line income exceeds the actual contractual payments (the “Excess”), the Excess should only be recognized to the extent it is collectable. In accordance with ASC 842, if collectability of the lease payments is not probable, lease income shall be limited to the lesser of the income that would be recognized in accordance with ASC 842 (straight-line basis) or the actual lease payment, including variable payments that have been collected from the lessee. The Company evaluates the entire stream of remaining lease payments on a lease-by-lease basis. Analysis of collectability from the lessee (tenant) is subjective and complex and is dependent on many factors including historical experience and the creditworthiness of the tenant. The creditworthiness of the tenant can, and often is, significantly influenced by major factors including the creditworthiness of multiple sub-tenants. The inability to access reliable credit information on all parties impacting the probability of collection creates a collectability constraint. Management updates its collectability analysis of long-term leases annually and has determined that collection of the entire remaining stream of remaining lease payments is not probable. Accordingly lease revenue, including variable payments, is recorded when received from the lessee.

How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the recognition of long-term lease revenue on a straight-line basis included the following, among others:

/s/ Stowe & Degon, LLC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.

Westborough, Massachusetts

March 19, 2018February 16, 2024

CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESSUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

CAPITAL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESSUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS