☒ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant are included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-I(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule12b-2). Yes ☐ No ☒

* New York REIT Liquidating LLC is the successor in interest to New York REIT, Inc. and files reports under the Commission file number for New York REIT, Inc.

Certain statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of New York REIT Liquidating LLC (the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “approximates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should,” “would” or similar expressions. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Many of the factors that will determine these items are beyond our ability to control or predict. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, public health crises, such as the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, as well as those items set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 under “Risk Factors” in Part 1, Item 1A.

Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law.

The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all the risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:

All forward-looking statements should be read together with the risks and other information discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

All references to the “Liquidating LLC” refer to New York REIT Liquidating LLC and all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer to New York REIT Liquidating LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to the Company’s ownership, investment in, and rights and obligations and actions with respect to, WWP Holdings LLC or Worldwide Plaza refer to the interests, rights and obligations, and actions of the Company’s subsidiary ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC, except that references relating to $90.7 million cash reserve established in 2017 from the proceeds of our sale of a 48.7% interest in Worldwide Plaza refer to amounts held by the Company and not by ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC. For example, statements such as “our sole remaining property related asset is a 50.1% ownership interest in Worldwide Plaza,” “our interest in Worldwide Plaza,” “our joint venture partner in Worldwide Plaza,” and similar statements refer to ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC’s interests, activities, rights and obligations, and partner with respect to Worldwide Plaza.

New York REIT Liquidating LLC was formed on November 7, 2018 and is the successor in interest to New York REIT, Inc. (the “Predecessor”). The Predecessor was incorporated on October 6, 2009 as a Maryland corporation that qualified as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes (“REIT”) beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010. On April 15, 2014, the Predecessor listed its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “NYRT.”

The sole purpose of the Company is to wind up the Company’s affairs and the liquidation of the Company’s assets with no objective to continue or to engage in the conduct of a trade or business, except as necessary for the orderly liquidation of the Company’s assets.

Substantially all of the Predecessor’s business was conducted through its operating partnership, New York Recovery Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “OP”).

On August 22, 2016, the Predecessor’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved a plan of liquidation to sell in an orderly manner all or substantially all of the assets of the Predecessor and its OP and to liquidate and dissolve the Predecessor and the OP (the “Liquidation Plan”), subject to stockholder approval (see Note 2). The Liquidation Plan was approved at a special meeting of stockholders on January 3, 2017. All of the assets held by the OP have been sold and the OP was dissolved prior to the conversion on November 7, 2018.

At December 31, 2022, the Company’s only significant assets are a 50.1% equity interest in WWP Holdings LLC (“WWP”) which owns one property, aggregating 2.0 million rentable square feet, with an occupancy of 91.0%, and a $90.7 million cash reserve. The Company’s property consists of office space, retail space and a garage, representing 88%, 5% and 7%, respectively, of rentable square feet at December 31, 2022.

Prior to February 28, 2023, the Company sold all of its properties except for the remaining 50.1% interest in Worldwide Plaza. Also, prior to February 28, 2023, the Company, together with the Predecessor, paid aggregate cash liquidating distributions of $1.0 billion, or $61.58 per common share/unit of common membership.

The Company has no employees. Since March 8, 2017, all advisory duties are administered by Winthrop REIT Advisors, LLC (the “Winthrop Advisor”).

Under the Liquidation Plan, the Predecessor was not, and under our limited liability company agreement we are not, permitted to make any new investments except to make protective acquisitions or advances with respect to our existing assets. We are permitted to satisfy any existing contractual obligations and fund required tenant improvements and capital expenditures at our real estate property owned by the joint venture in which we own an interest.

The Liquidation Plan enables us to sell any and all of our assets without further approval of the unitholders and provides that liquidating distributions be made to the unitholders as determined by the Company’s Board of Managers (the “Board of Managers”).

transfer books were closed as of 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on such date. At the effective time of the conversion, each outstanding share of common stock was converted into one unit of common membership interest in the Liquidating LLC (a “Unit”), and holders of shares of the Predecessor’s common stock automatically received one Unit (which Unit was in book entry form) for each share of the common stock held by such stockholder. Unlike shares of the Predecessor’s common stock, which, in addition to being listed on the NYSE, were freely transferable, Units are not listed for trading and generally are not transferable except by will, intestate succession or operation of law. Therefore, the holders of Units do not have the ability to realize any value from these interests except from distributions made by the Company, the timing of which will be solely in the discretion of the Board of Managers.

The Board of Managers was comprised of three members: Randolph C. Read, Craig T. Bouchard and Howard Goldberg. On November 7, 2022, Howard Goldberg resigned from the Board of Managers, effective immediately, pursuant to the terms of the Limited Liability Agreement of the Company. This was not as a result of any disagreement with the operations, policies or practices of the Company. On November 9, 2022, Michael L. Ashner was appointed as a member of the Board of Managers. Since November 9, 2022, the Board of Managers is comprised of Randolph C. Read, Craig T. Bouchard and Michael L. Ashner.

Additionally, John Lee and Joseph Moinian, representing two of the Company’s largest unitholders, served as observers to the Board of Managers from October 4, 2021 and June 30, 2020, respectively, in unpaid positions with no voting rights in connection with Board of Managers matters. On November 8, 2022, John Lee resigned from his position as an observer to the Board of Managers, effective immediately, in accordance with the terms of the previously disclosed Board Observer Agreement between himself and the Company. On November 13, 2022, Joseph Moinian resigned from his position as an observer to the Board of Managers, effective immediately, in accordance with the terms of the previously disclosed Board Observer Agreement between himself and the Company.

The business of the Company is the same as the business of the Predecessor immediately preceding the conversion, which, consistent with the Liquidation Plan, consists of the continued ownership of the Predecessor’s interest in Worldwide Plaza, the only remaining property-related asset. Under its operating agreement, the business and affairs of the Company will be managed by or under the direction of its Board of Managers, and the sole purpose is winding up the affairs of the Company and the liquidation of its remaining property-related asset. On March 14, 2022, pursuant to the terms of the operating agreement of the Company, the Board of Managers extended the term of the Company such that the Company will remain in existence until the earlier of (i) the distribution of all Company assets pursuant to liquidation, or (ii) December 31, 2023. The term may be extended to such later date as the Board of Managers determines is reasonably necessary to fulfill the purposes of the Company.

The dissolution process and the amount and timing of distributions to unitholders involves risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, it is not possible to predict the timing or aggregate amount which will be ultimately distributed to unitholders and no assurance can be given that the distributions will equal or exceed the estimate of net assets presented in the Consolidated Statements of Net Assets.

Pursuant to the Liquidation Plan, excluding the partial sale of Worldwide Plaza, we sold six properties for an aggregate purchase price of $1.325 billion during 2017 and ten properties for an aggregate purchase price of $479.6 million in 2018. There were no property sales during the years 2019-2022.

Our one remaining property asset is located in New York, New York. See “Properties” in Part I, Item 2 for a description of our remaining asset.

At December 31, 2022, we indirectly had debt of $601.2 million of unconsolidated mortgage debt reflecting our pro rata share of Worldwide Plaza’s total mortgage debt of $1.2 billion, with a weighted average interest rate equal to 3.98% per annum and a weighted average term to maturity of five years.

The Liquidating LLC is treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision or benefit for income taxes is made in the consolidated financial statements. Distributions from the Liquidating LLC are not taxable in and of themselves. Unitholders will receive a Schedule K-1 from the Liquidating LLC annually reflecting their allocable share of the Liquidating LLC’s income, loss, gains and deductions.

The New York City real estate market is highly competitive and there are many competing properties in the New York MSA. With respect to the remaining property asset that we own, we compete for tenants based on a number of factors that include location, rental rates, security, suitability of the property’s design to prospective tenants’ needs and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. Many competitors have substantially greater marketing budgets and financial resources than we do which could limit our success when we compete with them directly. Competition could have a material effect on our occupancy levels, rental rates and on property operating expenses. The manager for leasing activity at our remaining property also manages leasing activity for multiple properties in New York MSA that we do not have an interest in, and we could compete with them for tenants. We also may compete with other entities advised or sponsored by affiliates of the Winthrop Advisor for tenants.

Subsequent to the adoption of the Liquidation Plan we have competition from newly developed as well as existing properties located in the New York City real estate market both from an operations perspective and with respect to the disposition of our property. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business and our net assets in liquidation.

Our investment is subject to various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, including, among other things, zoning regulations, land use controls, environmental controls relating to air and water quality, noise pollution and indirect environmental impacts such as increased motor vehicle activity. We believe that we have all permits and approvals necessary under current law to operate our investment.

As an owner of real estate, we are subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. Compliance with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, and management does not believe it will have such an impact in the future. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on the property in which we hold an interest.

We have no employees. The employees of the Winthrop Advisor and their affiliates perform a full range of real estate services for us, including accounting, asset management and investor relations services.

We are dependent on these affiliates for services that are essential to us, including asset dispositions, asset management and other general administrative responsibilities.

With the adoption of the Liquidation Plan, we have only one reporting segment subsequent to January 3, 2017.

Our website is located at www.nyrt.com. We post filings on our website as soon as practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and any amendments to such reports or statements. All such postings and filings are available on the “Investor” portion of our website free of charge. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, which is available free of charge.

We are not incorporating by reference our website or any information contained on or connected to our website into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Set forth below are the risk factors that we believe are material to our investors. The occurrence of any of the risks discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could have a material adverse effect on our Liquidation Plan or could delay or reduce liquidating distributions to our unitholders. In this section, references to “you” refers to the holders of our Units.

We cannot assure you of the actual amount you will receive in liquidating distributions pursuant to the Liquidation Plan or when you will receive them.

The net proceeds of the Liquidation Plan will be distributed to unitholders over time in one or more liquidating distributions. The actual amount that we will distribute to you in the liquidation will depend upon the actual amount of our liabilities, the actual proceeds from the sale of our remaining property, the actual fees and expenses incurred in connection with the sale of our property, the actual expenses incurred in the administration of our property prior to disposition, our actual general and administrative expenses, including fees paid to the Winthrop Advisor and its affiliates and other liabilities that may be incurred by us, our ability to avoid U.S. federal income and excise taxes throughout the period of the liquidation process and other factors. If our liabilities (including, without limitation, tax liabilities and compliance costs) are greater than we currently expect or if the sales price of our remaining property related asset is less than we expect, you will receive less in total liquidating distributions.

While we have previously provided estimates about the timing and amount of liquidating distributions that we will make, these estimates are based on multiple assumptions, one or more of which may prove to be incorrect, and the actual amount of liquidating distributions we pay to you may be more or less than these estimates. We cannot assure you of the actual amount you will receive in liquidating distributions pursuant to the Liquidation Plan or when they will be paid.

We have filed an action for declaratory judgment in Delaware Chancery Court seeking to affirm the Company’s right to distribute the $90.7 million cash reserve. Our joint venture partner has opposed our right to do so which will affect our ability to make such distributions to unitholders.

We initially set aside approximately $90.7 million from the 2017 refinancing proceeds to cover our share of potential future leasing and capital costs at the property; as discussed in “Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies,” we believe that any obligation to reserve this amount has lapsed and we are seeking a declaratory judgment in the Delaware Court of Chancery that we are permitted to distribute the reserved funds.

Our subsidiary, ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC, has sought declaratory relief that it need not fund certain disputed capital contributions exceeding $82 million under the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of WWP Holdings, LLC (“LLC Agreement”) related to proposed capital improvements at Worldwide Plaza. WWP JV LLC’s counterclaim

against the Company seeks declaratory relief that the Company must continue to maintain the 90.7 million cash reserve until such time as a member of WWP Holdings, LLC issues a call notice for such reserved funds under the LLC Agreement.

The Company cannot predict and expresses no prediction as to the outcome of these matters.

If we are unable to find buyers for our assets on a timely basis or at our expected sales prices, our liquidating distributions may be delayed or reduced.

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our remaining interest in Worldwide Plaza is our only remaining property related asset. The sales price that we will ultimately be able to obtain for our asset is subject to many variables. For example, in order to find a buyer in a timely manner, we may be required to lower our asking price below the low end of our current estimate of the asset’s market value. If we are not able to find a buyer for this asset in a timely manner or if we have overestimated the sales price we will receive, our liquidating distributions to our unitholders would be delayed or reduced. Furthermore, real estate sales prices are constantly changing and fluctuate with changes in interest rates, supply and demand dynamics, occupancy percentages, lease rates, the availability of suitable buyers, the perceived quality and dependability of income flows from tenants and a number of other factors, both local and national. In addition, the amount of transactional fees and expenses or unknown liabilities, if any, may adversely impact the net liquidation proceeds from our assets.

If the COVID-19 pandemic materially impacts cash flow at Worldwide Plaza, our liquidating distributions may be delayed or reduced.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and may continue to have, an impact on the ability of the tenants at Worldwide Plaza to pay their contractual rents when due or at all. This is especially true for retail and amenities tenants that have been and may continue to be forced to close as a result of government protective measures. Delays or reductions in the payment of rent by tenants of the property, will result in delays or reductions in the cash distributions we receive from the property which will affect the timing and amount of liquidating distributions to our unitholders. Given the uncertainty around the extent and timing of the potential future spread or mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic and the imposition or relaxation of protective measures, we cannot at this time reasonably estimate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to our liquidating distributions and the impact could be material.

If the COVID-19 pandemic continues for an extended period of time, the demand for New York City properties may diminish and market values could be reduced, delaying or reducing our liquidating distributions.

The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown and is dependent on various factors and consequences outside of our control. Should the effects of the pandemic and government protective measures in response thereto continue for an extended period of time, the demand for properties in the New York City metropolitan area may be reduced, making it more difficult for us to sell our remaining interest in Worldwide Plaza in the timeframe contemplated by the Liquidation Plan or for the current estimated market value of the property. If we are not able to find a buyer for this asset in a timely manner or if we have overestimated the sales price we will receive, whether because of the current economic environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic or otherwise, our liquidating distributions to our unitholders could be delayed or reduced.

It is possible we may require additional funds for other capital needs including capital expenditures, working capital and other expenses related to our remaining investment property. There is no assurance that we will have sufficient capital to complete the Liquidation Plan effectively. If we need additional capital, we are unlikely to be able to access the capital markets and any failure to obtain financing to meet our capital needs, on favorable terms or at all, could reduce and delay the liquidating distributions we make to our unitholders from the property.

We are dependent on our joint venture partner, which is the administrative member and has day-to-day control over the activities of Worldwide Plaza, and there can be no assurance as to the timing of a sale of Worldwide Plaza or that we will realize our estimated value.

Our only remaining investment is our 50.1% equity interest in the joint venture that owns Worldwide Plaza. While we own a majority of the membership interests in Worldwide Plaza, under the Worldwide Plaza joint venture agreement, our joint venture partner, which is a joint venture between an affiliate of SL Green Realty Corp. and a private equity fund sponsored by RXR Realty

LLC, is the manager of the joint venture and is responsible for day-to-day management of Worldwide Plaza. All major decisions require the consent of the WWP Board of Managers, however, we do not have control of the day-to-day decisions to be made by Worldwide Plaza, and therefore we are dependent on our joint venture partners and there is a risk of impasse. Additionally, under the joint venture agreement, we would lose approval rights relating to property-level major decisions for Worldwide Plaza if our current designee ceased to serve on the WWP Board of Managers and we did not appoint a replacement consented to by our joint venture partners, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, within 90 days. Investments in joint ventures, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present were a third party not involved. Our joint venture partner may have economic or other business interests or goals which are inconsistent with our business interests or goals and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives. Disputes between us and our joint venture partner have resulted, and may in the future result, in litigation. See “Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies” of our notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on From 10-K. Consequently, actions by or disputes with our joint venture partner might result in subjecting us to additional risk. In addition, in certain circumstances we may be liable for the actions of our joint venture partner or subject to dilution of our interest if we fail to make capital contributions to the venture in accordance with the terms of agreements regarding such contributions.

We have a right to transfer our membership interests in Worldwide Plaza to purchasers meeting certain qualifications, subject to a right of first offer to our joint venture partner. Commencing January 18, 2022, we and our joint venture partner also have the right to require the joint venture to market the property owned by it for sale, subject to a right of first offer to our joint venture partner.

Any transferee of our interest would acquire an interest subject to the same limitations on participation in the management of Worldwide Plaza that are applicable to us. There can be no assurance these limitations will not affect our ability to sell our interest in Worldwide Plaza or the amount we would receive on a sale. In addition, we may determine that a sale of the property rather than our interest in Worldwide Plaza is the best way to maximize the value of our interest in Worldwide Plaza. A sale of the property could substantially delay the timing of our complete liquidation. Additionally, the existence of the right of first offers may delay our ability to sell the Worldwide Plaza property or our interest in Worldwide Plaza on terms and in the timeframe of our choosing and may diminish the price we receive on a sale.

The timing of the sale of the property, or our interest in the property, and the ultimate value we receive from the sale, are subject to change. We initially set aside approximately $90.7 million from the 2017 refinancing proceeds to cover our share of potential future leasing and capital costs at the property; as discussed in “Note 8—Commitments and Contingencies,” we believe that any obligation to reserve this amount has lapsed and we are seeking a declaratory judgment in the Delaware Court of Chancery that we are permitted to distribute the reserved funds.

Our ability to sell the Worldwide Plaza property may be delayed by a right of first offer held by one of the tenants of the Worldwide Plaza property.

The lease with one of the tenants at the Worldwide Plaza property contains a right of first offer in the event that WWP is selling 100% of the property. The right requires that WWP offer the tenant the option to purchase 100% of the Worldwide Plaza property, at a price (and on other material terms) proposed by WWP prior to selling the Worldwide Plaza property to a third party. If, after a 45-day period, that tenant does not accept the offer, WWP may then sell the Worldwide Plaza property to a third party, provided that WWP will be required to re-offer the property to that tenant if we desire to sell the Worldwide Plaza property for a purchase price (and other economic consideration) less than 92.5% of the initial purchase price contained in the offer to that tenant. The existence of this right of first offer may delay WWP’s ability to sell the Worldwide Plaza property on terms and in the timeframe of our choosing and may diminish the price other potential purchasers may be willing to pay for the Worldwide Plaza property, which may reduce or delay the liquidating distributions that will be paid to our unitholders.

If we make distributions to our members without making adequate provisions for payment of creditors’ claims or expenses, the amount of liquidation proceeds will be reduced, and our members would be liable to the creditors to the extent of any payments due to creditors.

Under Delaware law, certain obligations or liabilities imposed by law on our members, managers or officers cannot be avoided when our Company is dissolved in accordance with the Liquidation Plan. For example, if we make distributions to our members without making adequate provisions for payment of creditors’ claims and expenses, the amount of liquidation proceeds will be reduced, and our members could be liable to the creditors to the extent of any payments due to creditors. To the extent that we have underestimated the size of our contingency reserve and distributions to our members have already been paid, our members may be required to return some or all of such distributions.

Decreases in property values may reduce the amount we receive upon the sale of our remaining property related asset, which would reduce the amount our members receive in liquidating distributions.

The Liquidation Plan provides for the sale of all our assets, which are real estate investments, and we cannot predict whether we will be able to do so at a price or on terms and conditions acceptable to us. Investments in real properties are relatively illiquid. The amount we receive upon the sale of our asset depends on the underlying value of our asset, and the underlying value of our asset may be reduced by a number of factors that are beyond our control, including, without limitation, the following:

If our liquidation costs or unpaid liabilities are greater than we expect, our liquidating distributions may be delayed or reduced.

Before making the final liquidating distribution, we will need to pay or arrange for the payment of all of our transaction costs in the liquidation, all other costs and all valid claims of our creditors. Our Board of Managers may also decide to acquire one or more insurance policies covering unknown or contingent claims against us, for which we would pay a premium which has not yet been determined. Our Board of Managers may also decide to establish a reserve fund to pay these contingent claims. In addition, if the claims of our creditors are greater than we have anticipated, our liquidating distributions may be delayed or reduced from our estimates. Further, if we decide to acquire one or more insurance policies covering unknown or contingent claims against us or a reserve fund is established, payment of liquidating distributions to our unitholders may be delayed or reduced.

Defaults under future sale agreements may delay or reduce liquidating distributions.

In connection with completing the Liquidation Plan, we will seek to enter into a binding sale agreement for our remaining property. The consummation of the potential sale for which we will enter into a sale agreement in the future will be subject to satisfaction of closing conditions. If the transaction contemplated by this future sale agreement does not close because of a buyer default, failure of a closing condition or for any other reason, we may not be able to enter into a new agreement on a timely basis or on terms that are as favorable as the original sale agreement. Any delay in the completion of the asset sale could delay our payment of liquidating distributions to our unitholders. We will also incur additional costs involved in locating a new buyer and negotiating a new sale agreement for this asset. If we incur these additional costs, our liquidating distributions to our unitholders would be reduced.

If the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) takes the view that the conversion was a sale of assets from New York REIT, Inc. to New York REIT Liquidating LLC constituting a “prohibited transaction,” then the conversion may be subject to a 100% excise tax on the net income from such “prohibited transaction,” which would reduce the amount of our liquidating distributions.

REITs are subject to a 100% excise tax on any net income from “prohibited transactions,” which include sales or other dispositions of property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of the REIT’s trade or business which is not a foreclosure property. The determination of whether property is held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our trade or business is inherently factual in nature and, thus, cannot be predicted with certainty although the Code does provide a “safe harbor” for certain types of transactions.

Following the conversion, we no longer qualify for taxation as a REIT, but rather we are taxed as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes. As a result, we are no longer subject to the 100% excise tax on the net income of “prohibited transactions” applicable to REITs for future sales. However, if the IRS takes the view that the conversion (which was treated as a sale of assets from New York REIT, Inc. to New York REIT Liquidating LLC) gave rise to one or more “prohibited transactions” resulting in the payment of taxes by us, then the amount of liquidating distributions to our unitholders could be significantly reduced.

Stockholder litigation related to the Liquidation Plan could result in substantial costs and distract our management.

Historically, extraordinary corporate actions by a company, such as the Liquidation Plan, sometimes lead to securities class action lawsuits being filed against that company. We were already subject to a stockholder lawsuit, which has subsequently been dismissed on the basis of a provision in the Predecessor’s bylaws providing that the state or federal courts of Maryland are the sole and exclusive forum, and which could be appealed, that included claims related to the strategic alternatives process that led to the approval of the Liquidation Plan and may become subject to more of this type of litigation as a result of the Liquidation Plan. Defending ourselves in this litigation may be expensive and, even if we ultimately prevail, the process of defending against lawsuits will divert management’s attention from implementing the Liquidation Plan and otherwise operating our business. If we do not prevail in any lawsuit, we may be liable for damages. We cannot predict the amount of any such damages, however, if applicable, they may be significant and may cause liquidating distributions to our unitholders to be reduced and/or delayed.

Unitholders could be liable to creditors to the extent of liquidating distributions received if contingent reserves are insufficient to satisfy our liabilities.

If a court holds at any time that we have failed to make adequate provision for our expenses and liabilities or if the amount ultimately required to be paid in respect of such liabilities exceeds the amount available from the contingency reserve and the assets of the limited liability company, our creditors could seek an injunction to prevent us from making distributions under the Liquidation Plan. Any such action could delay or substantially diminish the cash distributions to be paid to holders of beneficial interests of the limited liability company under the Liquidation Plan.

Any stockholders who did not sell their shares of common stock prior to the conversion received membership interests in the limited liability company equivalent to their ownership interests in the Predecessor as represented by the shares of common stock they held prior to the conversion. Membership interests in the limited liability company are generally non-transferable except by will, intestate succession or operation of law. Because of the illiquid nature of these interests, there can be no assurance as to how long any holder thereof may be required to hold them.

Our remaining property related asset is located in the New York MSA, making us dependent upon the economic climate in New York City.

Our one remaining investment is located in the New York MSA. We are subject to risks generally inherent in concentrating investments in a certain geography. These risks resulting from a lack of diversification may become even greater in the event of a downturn in the commercial real estate industry and could significantly adversely affect the value of our property. A downturn in New York City’s economy, in a submarket within New York City or in the overall national economy could, for example, result in reduced demand for office space. Likewise, declines in the financial services or media sectors may have a disproportionate adverse effect on the New York City real estate market. We believe that there has been a softening in the market for office real estate in New York City which has affected and could continue to affect the proceeds from sale of our property.

Because our portfolio includes a commercial office building located in the New York MSA, which has a relatively large number of financial and professional services sector, significant job losses in the financial and professional services sector may decrease demand for office space, causing market rental rates and property values to be negatively impacted.

We may be adversely affected by certain trends that reduce demand for office real estate.

Some businesses are rapidly evolving to increasingly permit employee telecommuting, flexible work schedules, open workplaces and teleconferencing. These practices enable businesses to reduce their space requirements. A continuation of the movement towards these practices could over time erode the overall demand for office space and, in turn, place downward pressure on occupancy, rental rates and property valuations.

The New York City real estate market is highly competitive and there are many competing properties in the New York MSA. With respect to the asset that we own, we compete for tenants based on a number of factors that include location, rental rates, security, suitability of the property’s design to prospective tenants’ needs and the manner in which the property is operated and marketed. Many competitors have substantially greater marketing budgets and financial resources than we do, which could limit our success when we compete with them directly. Competition could have a material effect on our occupancy levels, rental rates and on property operating expenses. We also may compete with other entities advised or sponsored by affiliates of the Winthrop Advisor as well SL Green Realty Corp. and RXR Realty LLC, as our partners under the Worldwide Plaza joint venture agreement for tenants.

Subsequent to the adoption of the Liquidation Plan we have competition from other properties located in the New York City real estate market both from an operations perspective and with respect to the disposition of our asset. We cannot assure you that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business and our net assets in liquidation.

We may be unable to renew expiring leases on terms and conditions that are as, or more, favorable as the terms and conditions of the expiring leases. For example, the lease for approximately 618,000 square feet of office space with Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (“Cravath, Swaine & Moore”) expires in August 2024 and the tenant has informed Worldwide Plaza that it does not intend to enter into a new lease upon expiration of the existing lease. In addition, vacancies may occur at our property due to a default by a tenant on its lease or expiration of a lease. Vacancies may reduce the value of a property as a result of reduced cash flow generated by the property. In addition, changes in space utilization by our tenants may impact our ability to renew or relet space without the need to incur substantial costs in renovating or redesigning the internal configuration of the relevant property. If we are unable to promptly

renew expiring leases or re-lease the space at similar rates or if we incur substantial costs in renewing or re-leasing the space, our cash flow and the amount of liquidating distributions we pay could be adversely affected.

We also may experience a decrease in occupancy and rental rates accompanied by increases in the cost of re-leasing space (including for tenant improvements) and in uncollectible receivables. Early lease terminations may significantly contribute to a decline in occupancy of our office property and may adversely affect the value of the impacted property. While lease termination fees increase current period income, future rental income may be diminished. During periods in which market rents decline, it is unlikely that we will collect from replacement tenants the full contracted amount which had been payable under the terminated leases.

Tenant credit concentrations make us more susceptible to adverse events with respect to those tenants.

As of December 31, 2022, the following existing tenants represented 5% or more of our total annualized cash base rents:

The financial failure of any or all of these tenants is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, the value of the applicable property or the amount or timing of liquidating distributions. In addition, the value of our property is driven in part by the credit quality of the underlying tenants, and an adverse change in the tenants’ financial conditions or a decline in the credit rating of such tenants may result in a decline in the value of our property.

As noted above, the lease with Cravath, Swaine & Moore expires in August 2024 and the tenant has informed Worldwide Plaza that it does not intend to enter into a new lease upon expiration of the existing lease.

If a tenant declares bankruptcy, we may be unable to collect balances due under relevant leases.

Any of our tenants, or any guarantor of a tenant’s lease obligations, could be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding pursuant to Title 11 of the bankruptcy laws of the United States. A bankruptcy filing by one of our tenants or any guarantor of a tenant’s lease obligations would bar all efforts by us to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from these entities or their properties, unless we receive an enabling order from the bankruptcy court. There is no assurance the tenant or its trustee would agree to assume the lease. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have a general unsecured claim for damages and it is unlikely we would receive any payments from the tenant.

A tenant or lease guarantor bankruptcy could delay efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude full collection of these sums. A tenant or lease guarantor bankruptcy could cause a decrease or cessation of rental payments, which could adversely affect our financial condition or the amount or timing of our liquidating distributions.

Our ability to operate our business and complete the Liquidation Plan depends upon the participation of executive officers, and other key personnel of the Winthrop Advisor, and there is no assurance that the advisory agreement with the Winthrop Advisor (the “Current Advisory Agreement”) will continue to be extended or that such officers and personnel will remain in place.

We are an externally managed company and have no employees of our own, and our ability to operate our business, including completing the Liquidation Plan and otherwise operate on a day-to-day basis, will depend to a significant degree upon the contributions of our executive officers, and other key personnel of the Winthrop Advisor. Personnel and services that we require are provided to us under contracts with an external advisor, and we are dependent on an external advisor to manage our operations and manage our real estate assets, including sale of our real estate assets. These responsibilities also include arranging financings, if needed, providing accounting services, providing information technology services, preparing and filing all reports required to be filed by it with the SEC, the IRS and other regulatory agencies.

The Advisory Agreement, as amended, provided for a term ending on November 7, 2018, the conversion date, and provides for the Advisory Agreement to automatically renew for one month periods on the expiration of any renewal term, unless terminated by either the Company or the Winthrop Advisor on 45 days’ notice before the expiration of any renewal term.

The termination of the Current Advisory Agreement or the loss of, or inability to retain, any key personnel of the Winthrop Advisor could adversely affect our business or our ability to successfully complete the Liquidation Plan. There can be no assurance that the Winthrop Advisor will otherwise be able to retain the services of our executive officers and other key personnel needed to successfully complete the Liquidation Plan.

Any adverse changes in the financial condition of, or our relationship with, the Winthrop Advisor could hinder our ability to successfully manage our investment and complete our plan of liquidation. Additionally, changes in ownership or management practices, the occurrence of adverse events affecting the Winthrop Advisor or its affiliates or other companies advised by the Winthrop Advisor and its affiliates could create adverse publicity and adversely affect us and our relationship with lenders, tenants or counterparties.

Our operating results are affected by economic and regulatory changes that can have an adverse impact on the real estate market in general.

Our operating results are subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:

Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage would reduce our cash flows and our liquidating distributions.

Our general liability coverage, property insurance coverage and umbrella liability coverage on our property may not be adequate to insure against liability claims and provide for the costs of defense. Similarly, we may not have adequate coverage against the risk of direct physical damage or to reimburse us on a replacement cost basis for costs incurred to repair or rebuild our property. Moreover, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with such catastrophic events could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims.

Changes in the cost or availability of insurance could expose us to uninsured casualty losses. If our property incurs a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our asset will be reduced by any such uninsured loss, which would reduce our liquidating distributions. In addition, other than any working capital reserve or other reserves we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured property. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, the amount of liquidating distributions we make to our unitholders would be negatively impacted.

Additionally, mortgage lenders insist in some cases that commercial property owners purchase coverage against terrorism as a condition for providing mortgage loans. Accordingly, to the extent terrorism risk insurance policies are not available at reasonable costs, if at all, our ability to finance or refinance our properties could be impaired. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. We may not have adequate, or any, coverage for such losses.

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence, civilian unrest, or war may affect the markets in which we operate our business and our profitability.

Our property related asset is located in the New York MSA which has experienced, and remains susceptible to, terrorist attacks. In addition, any kind of terrorist activity or violent criminal acts, including terrorist acts against public institutions or buildings or modes of public transportation (including airlines, trains or buses) could have a negative effect on our business and the value of our property. More generally, any terrorist attack, other act of violence or war, including armed conflicts, could result in increased volatility in, or damage to, the worldwide financial markets and economy including demand for properties and the availability of financing.

The impact of volatility and disruptions in the global credit and financial markets could increase our counterparty credit risks

Economic downturns, including failures of financial institutions and any related liquidity crisis, can disrupt the capital and credit markets. Such disruptions could cause counterparties to be unable to perform their obligations or to breach their obligations to us under our contracts with them. While we believe that there is a low likelihood that our counterparties will fail to meet their obligations, there can be no assurance that we will adequately protect against these risks.

Our property taxes could increase due to reassessment or property tax rate changes.

We are required to pay real property taxes in respect of our property and such taxes may increase as our property is reassessed by taxing authorities or as property tax rates change. An increase in the assessed value of our property or our property tax rates could adversely impact our financial condition and reduce the amount of liquidating distributions we make to our unitholders.

Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations, including those relating to environmental matters and discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions for noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances.

In addition, when excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing, as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold at our remaining property asset could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property, which would adversely affect our operating results.

The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could materially adversely affect our business, the value of our property and, consequently, the amounts available to make liquidating distributions to our unitholders.

Environmental laws also may impose liens on property or restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us from operating such property. Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability.

There are costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “Disabilities Act”).

Our properties are subject to the Disabilities Act. Under the Disabilities Act, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. The Disabilities Act has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services, including restaurants and retail stores, be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. The Disabilities Act’s requirements could require removal of access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties, or, in some cases, an award of damages.

Our business could suffer in the event the Winthrop Advisor or any other party that provides us with services essential to our operations experiences system failures or cyber-incidents or a deficiency in cybersecurity.

Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for the internal information technology systems of the Winthrop Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations, we are vulnerable to damages from any number of sources, including computer viruses, unauthorized access, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication failures. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business.

A cyber-incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information resources. More specifically, a cyber-incident is an intentional attack or an unintentional event that can result in third parties gaining unauthorized access to systems to disrupt operations, corrupt data or steal confidential information. As reliance on technology in our industry has increased, so have the risks posed to the systems of the Winthrop Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations. In addition, the risk of a cyber-incident, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Even the most well protected information networks, systems and facilities remain potentially vulnerable because the techniques used in such attempted attacks and intrusions evolve and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected.

The remediation costs and lost revenues experienced by a victim of a cyber-incident may be significant and significant resources may be required to repair system damage, protect against the threat of future security breaches or to alleviate problems, including reputational harm, loss of revenues and litigation, caused by any breaches.

In addition, a security breach or other significant disruption involving the IT networks and related systems of the Winthrop Advisor or any other party that provides us with services essential to our operations could:

Although the Winthrop Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations intend to continue to implement industry-standard security measures, there can be no assurance that those measures will be sufficient, and any material adverse effect experienced by the Winthrop Advisor and other parties that provide us with services essential to our operations could, in turn, have an adverse impact on us.

Employees of the Winthrop Advisor, including employees who are our executive officers and a member of our Board of Managers, face conflicts of interest related to the positions they hold with the Winthrop Advisor and its affiliates.

We are an externally managed company and have no employees. Employees or consultants of the Winthrop Advisor who provide services to us, including employees or consultants who serve as our executive officers and as a member of our Board of Managers, also hold or may hold positions with the Winthrop Advisor and its affiliates and provide services with respect to other entities or with respect to other properties or businesses of the Winthrop Advisor and its affiliates, which could result in conflicts of interest.

The Winthrop Advisor and its affiliates or entities that they advise own properties, and may seek to acquire additional properties, in the New York metropolitan area. Conflicts could result in actions or inactions by the Winthrop Advisor or employees or consultants of the Winthrop Advisor, including employees or consultants who are our executive officers and a member of our Board of Managers, that are detrimental to our business. Conflicts with our business and interests are most likely to arise from involvement in activities related to (a) allocation of management time and services between us and the other entities, (b) terms and timing of sales of properties, and (c) the lease of vacant space or renewal of existing leases at our properties as compared to properties owned or managed by affiliates of the Winthrop Advisor.

The Winthrop Advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to the structure of the fees they receive, which could result in actions that are not necessarily in the long-term best interests of our unitholders.

Under the Current Advisory Agreement, the Winthrop Advisor is entitled to certain fees and other compensation which may result in its interests not being wholly aligned with those of our unitholders. For example, the Winthrop Advisor could be motivated to recommend certain actions that could increase the potential that it will earn incentive fees, but which may not be consistent with actions desired by our stockholders.

We depend on our joint venture for cash flow and are structurally subordinated in right of payment to the obligations of our joint venture.

Our only significant assets are our interest in the joint venture that owns Worldwide Plaza and our $90.7 million cash reserve. Accordingly, we rely on distributions from our joint venture of their net earnings and cash flows.

There is no assurance that our joint venture will be able to, or be permitted to, pay distributions to us that will enable us to pay our obligations. Our joint venture is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from this entity.

Our rights and the rights of our members to recover claims against our managers and officers are limited, which could reduce recoveries against them if they cause us to incur losses.

Our limited liability company agreement provides that no manager or officer will be liable to us or our members for monetary damages and requires us to indemnify our managers and our officers. Our limited liability company agreement also provides that our managers shall have the same duties, including a duty of loyalty and a duty of care to the Company and its members as does a director of a corporation incorporated under the Delaware General Corporation Law, assuming that such director was protected to the maximum extent possible by the inclusion in the certificate of incorporation of a provision eliminating or limiting the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. We and our members may have more limited rights against our managers and officers than might otherwise exist under common law, which could reduce recoveries against them. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs or otherwise reimburse for losses incurred by our managers or officers in some cases pursuant to our agreements with them.

Our Joint Venture has outstanding debt, and the amount of debt and its cost may increase and refinancing may not be available on acceptable terms.

Our business is subject to risks normally associated with debt financing. The total principal amount of our combined outstanding indebtedness, which represents our pro rata share of Worldwide Plaza’s indebtedness, was $601.2 million as of December 31, 2022.

We may be unable to obtain debt financing or refinance existing indebtedness upon maturity. Our substantial indebtedness and the cash flow associated with serving our indebtedness could have important consequences, including the risks that:

In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of an investment in us. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a foreclosure of our property would be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but would not receive any cash proceeds. We may give full or partial guarantees to lenders of mortgage debt to the entity that owns our property. If we provide a guaranty on behalf of an entity that owns our property, we will be responsible to the lender for satisfaction of the debt if it is not paid by such entity. If our property is foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders will be adversely affected which would result in a decrease in the amount of liquidating distributions we will be able to pay.

Tax-exempt entities and non-U.S. persons face unique tax issues from holding units that may result in adverse tax consequences to them.

Investment in the units by tax-exempt entities, including employee benefit plans and individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”), and non-U.S. persons raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all income of the Liquidating LLC that would be allocated to organizations exempt from U.S. federal income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, would be unrelated business taxable income and may be taxable to such holders if they are not “qualified organizations” within the meaning of Section 514(c)(9)(B) of the

Code. Distributions to non-U.S. persons will generally be reduced by withholding taxes imposed at the highest effective applicable tax rate, and non-U.S. persons will be required to file U.S. federal income tax returns and pay tax on their respective shares of the Liquidating LLC’s taxable income.

You may be subject to state and local taxes and return filing requirements in the state where the Company owns property as a result of holding units.

Following the conversion, in addition to U.S. federal income taxes, the unitholders of the Liquidating LLC may become subject to other taxes, including state and local income taxes, unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or intangible taxes that may be imposed by New York State and New York City, even if they do not reside in those jurisdictions. Unitholders would likely be required to file New York State and New York City income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes. Further, unitholders may become subject to penalties for failure to comply with these requirements. It is the responsibility of each unitholder to file all U.S. federal, state and local income tax returns that may be required of such unitholder.

At December 31, 2022, our sole remaining property related asset is a 50.1% interest in Worldwide Plaza located in New York, New York. The following table presents certain additional information about the property, including the rentable square footage and annualized cash base rent of Worldwide Plaza multiplied by our pro rata share of our investment in WWP:

The following is a summary of our pro rata share of Worldwide Plaza lease expirations for the next ten years as of December 31, 2022 (dollar value in thousands):

The following table lists the tenants whose rented square footage is greater than 10% of the total rentable square footage of Worldwide Plaza as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands):

As of December 31, 2022, the Worldwide Plaza debt has an outstanding balance of $1.2 billion, bears interest at a blended rate of 3.98% per annum, requires monthly payments of interest only and matures in November 2027. We have no mortgage debt other than our 50.1% share of the Worldwide Plaza debt.

Except as set forth below and described in “Note 8 — Commitments and Contingencies” of our notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are not a party to, and none of our properties are subject to, any material pending legal proceedings.

On December 28, 2022, the Company filed suit against WWP JV LLC captioned New York REIT Liquidating LLC v. WWP JV LLC, (Del. Ch.). The Company is seeking declaratory relief that it may release to its unitholders a reserve of more than $90 million (the “Reserve”) which was established in 2017 in connection with a transaction between the Company’s subsidiary, ARC NYWWPJV 001, LLC, and WWP JV LLC relating to WWP JV LLC's proposed investment in Worldwide Plaza, an office and retail mixed-use project located in midtown Manhattan.

The Company’s subsidiary, ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC filed suit against WWP JV LLC on December 22, 2022. The suit is captioned ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC v. WWP JV LLC, (Sup. Ct. N.Y. City.), and, on February 10, 2023, the Company was named as Counterclaim Defendant and Third-Party Defendant in such action. ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC has sought declaratory relief that it need not fund certain disputed capital contributions exceeding $82 million under the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of WWP Holdings, LLC (“LLC Agreement”) related to proposed capital improvements at Worldwide Plaza. WWP JV LLC’s counterclaim against the Company seeks declaratory relief that the Company must continue to maintain the Reserve until such time as a member of WWP Holdings, LLC issues a call notice for the Reserve under the LLC Agreement (the “Counterclaim”). WWP JV LLC’s third party claims against the Company assert claims for fraud, fraudulent inducement, and unjust enrichment and seek damages in excess of $90 million (the “Third Party Claims”). It is the Company’s and ARC NYWWPJV001’s position that the Counterclaim and Third Party Claims are without merit and fail to state any causes of action upon which relief may be granted as a matter of law and/or pursuant to the express terms of the LLC Agreement. Moreover, NYRT is not a party to the LLC Agreement and there is a prior action between NYRT and WWP JV LLC pending in Delaware.

If the Company is unsuccessful in receiving favorable declaratory judgments in the above-referenced actions or is unsuccessful in defending the claims against it therein, the Company may be required to contribute additional capital to the joint venture. The Company cannot predict and expresses no prediction as to the outcome of these matters. Therefore, the Company cannot estimate the range of any reasonably possible loss.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The Predecessor’s common stock was traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NYRT.” In connection with the conversion of the Predecessor to the Company, the stock transfer books of the Predecessor were closed as of the close of business on November 2, 2018, which was the last day of trading for the Predecessor’s common stock. For tax purposes, the fair value of each Unit in the Company received by stockholders when the conversion became effective, which reflects the value of the remaining assets of the Company (net of liabilities), was $14.00 per Unit and was equal to the average of the high and low trading prices for shares of the Predecessor’s common stock on the last three days on which the shares were traded on the NYSE. The Units of the Company are not listed for trading on any exchange, and there is no established trading market for the Units.

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NYRT common stock, based on the closing market price of the common stock and reinvested dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) Equity Index and the New York Stock Exchange Index (“NYSE Index”) for the period commencing April 15, 2014, the date on which we listed our shares on the NYSE and ending November 2, 2018, the last day of trading. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on April 15, 2014.

For each calendar quarter indicated, the following table reflects high and low sales prices for the common stock as reported by the NYSE and the amounts paid to our stockholders in respect of these shares to which we refer as “dividends.” All dollar amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 1-for-10 reverse split that occurred in March 2018.

At February 28, 2023, we had 16,791,769 Units outstanding held by a total of 8,327 unitholders of record.

Pursuant to the Liquidation Plan and our Limited Liability Company Agreement dated November 7, 2018, the actual amount and timing of, and record date for, future liquidating distributions on our Units will be determined by our Board of Managers and will depend upon the timing and amount of cash flow distributions and ultimate sale proceeds from our interest in Worldwide Plaza and the amounts deemed necessary by our Board of Managers to pay or provide for our liabilities and obligations. The actual cash flow available to pay distributions will be affected by a number of factors, including among others, the risks and information discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We did not repurchase any of our Units during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

All interested parties (including our unitholders) may communicate with our Board of Managers by sending written communications addressed to such person or persons in care of New York REIT Liquidating LLC, 2 Liberty Square, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02109, Attention: John Garilli, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Mr. Garilli will deliver all appropriate communications to our Board of Managers no later than the next regularly scheduled meeting of our Board of Managers. If our Board of Managers modifies this process, the revised process will be posted on our website.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements of New York REIT Liquidating LLC and the notes thereto. As used herein, the term “Liquidating LLC” refers to New York REIT Liquidating LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and the terms “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to New York REIT Liquidating LLC, and its consolidated subsidiaries and, as required by context to New York REIT, Inc., (the “Predecessor”) a Maryland corporation, to New York Recovery Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “OP”), and to their subsidiaries. References to the Company’s ownership, investment in, and rights and obligations and actions with respect to, WWP Holdings LLC or Worldwide Plaza refer to the interests, rights and obligations, and actions of the Company’s subsidiary ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC, except that references relating to the $90.7 million cash reserve established in 2017 from the proceeds of our sale of a 48.7% interest in Worldwide Plaza refer to amounts held by the Company and not by ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC. For example, statements such as “our sole remaining property related asset is a 50.1% ownership interest in Worldwide Plaza”, “our interest in Worldwide Plaza”, “our joint venture partner in Worldwide Plaza,” and similar statements refer to ARC NYWWPJV001, LLC’s interests, activities, rights and obligations, and partner with respect to Worldwide Plaza.

As of March 8, 2017, we are externally managed by Winthrop REIT Advisors, LLC (the “Winthrop Advisor”). The following information contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Please see “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this report for a description of these risks and uncertainties. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined have the meaning ascribed to those terms under “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Part II, Item 8, which includes the notes to our consolidated financial statements and contained herein.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a discussion of our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. These audited financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

On August 22, 2016 the Predecessor’s Board of Directors approved a plan of liquidation to sell in an orderly manner all or substantially all of its assets and the assets of the OP (the “Liquidation Plan”), subject to stockholder approval. The Liquidation Plan was approved at a special meeting of stockholders on January 3, 2017.

The Liquidation Plan provides for an orderly sale of the Predecessor’s assets, payment of its liabilities and other obligations and the winding down of operations and the dissolution of the Predecessor. We are no longer permitted to make any new investments except to make protective acquisitions on advances with respect to our existing assets. We are permitted to satisfy any existing contractual obligations and pay for required tenant improvements and capital expenditures at our real estate property owned by the joint venture in which we own an interest.

In order to comply with applicable tax laws, New York REIT, Inc. converted into a limited liability company known as New York REIT Liquidating LLC. The conversion to the Company was approved by the Predecessor’s stockholders on September 7, 2018 and became effective on November 7, 2018. The Liquidation Plan enables us to sell our assets without further approval of the stockholders or unitholders and provides that liquidating distributions be made to the stockholders as determined by the Board of Directors, and following the conversion, to our unitholders as determined by the Board of Managers.

In October 2018, the Predecessor announced the withdrawal of its common stock from listing on the NYSE in connection with the conversion. November 2, 2018 was the last day on which shares of its common stock were traded on the NYSE and its stock transfer books were closed as of 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on such date. At the effective time of the conversion, each outstanding share of common stock was converted into one unit of common membership interest in the Liquidating LLC (a “Unit”), and holders of shares of the Predecessors common stock automatically received one Unit (which Unit was in book entry form) for each share of the common stock held by such stockholder. Unlike shares of the Predecessor’s common stock, which, in addition to being listed on the NYSE, were freely transferable, Units are not listed for trading and generally are not transferable except by will, intestate succession

or operation of law. Therefore, the holders of Units do not have the ability to realize any value from these interests except from distributions made by the Company, the timing of which will be solely in the discretion of the Board of Managers.

The Board of Managers was comprised of three members: Randolph C. Read, Craig T. Bouchard and Howard Goldberg. On November 7, 2022, Howard Goldberg resigned from the Board of Managers, effective immediately, pursuant to the terms of the Limited Liability Agreement of the Company and not as a result of any disagreement with the operations, policies or practices of the Company. On November 9, 2022, Michael L. Ashner was appointed as a member of the Board of Managers. As of November 9, 2022, the Board of Managers is comprised of Randolph C. Read, Craig T. Bouchard and Michael L. Ashner.

The Company is deemed to be the same entity as the Predecessor with the same assets and liabilities as the Predecessor on the date of conversion. In addition, the charter and bylaws of the Predecessor were replaced by the operating agreement of the Company. For tax purposes, the fair value of each Unit in the Company received by stockholders when the conversion became effective, which reflects the value of the remaining assets of the Company (net of liabilities), was $14.00 per Unit and was equal to the average of the high and low trading prices for shares of the Predecessor’s common stock on the last three days on which the shares were traded on the NYSE. For a detailed description of the federal income tax and investment considerations relating to the conversion and its effects on our interests in the Predecessor, please see the Predecessor’s proxy statement/prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2018.

The business of the Company is the same as the business of the Predecessor immediately preceding the conversion, which, consistent with the Liquidation Plan, consists of the continued ownership of the Predecessor’s interest in Worldwide Plaza, the only remaining property-related asset. Under its operating agreement, the business and affairs of the Company will be managed by or under the direction of its Board of Managers, and the sole purpose is winding up the affairs of the liquidation of its remaining property-related asset. On March 14, 2022, pursuant to the terms of the operating agreement of the Company, the Board of Managers extended the term of the Company such that the Company will remain in existence until the earlier of (i) the distribution of all company assets pursuant to liquidation or (ii) December 31, 2023.

The dissolution process and the amount and timing of distributions to unitholders involves risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, it is not possible to predict the timing or aggregate amount which will be ultimately distributed to unitholders, and no assurance can be given that the distributions will equal or exceed the estimate of net assets presented in the Consolidated Statement of Net Assets. To date, liquidating distributions totaling $61.58 per common share/Unit have been paid.

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, all of our property related assets have been sold except our remaining interest in Worldwide Plaza. For purposes of liquidation accounting, our estimate of net assets in liquidation value assumes a sale of Worldwide Plaza at December 31, 2023 which is based on estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates as well as available market information and assumptions regarding capital expenditures. The actual timing of sale has not yet been determined and is subject to future events and uncertainties. These estimates are subject to change based on the actual timing of the sale of our remaining interest in Worldwide Plaza and the actual cash distributions received during our holding period. The net assets in liquidation of $121.2 million at December 31, 2022 are presented on an undiscounted basis.

Net operating income at Worldwide Plaza has remained relatively steady throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. We will continue to monitor the market and adjust the net realizable value of the investment, if necessary, at each reporting period. The timing of the sale of the property, and the ultimate value we receive from the sale, are subject to change. We initially set aside approximately $90.7 million from the 2017 refinancing proceeds to cover our share of potential future leasing and capital costs at the property; as discussed in “Note 8 — Commitments and Contingencies,” we believe that any obligation to reserve this amount has lapsed and we are seeking a declaratory judgment in the Delaware Court of Chancery that we are permitted to distribute the reserved funds.

As of December 31, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash aggregating $100.7 million. Our total assets and undiscounted net assets in liquidation were $123.4 million and $121.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2022.

Our principal demands for funds are to pay or fund operating expenses, capital expenditures and liquidating distributions to our unitholders. We believe that our current cash balance plus distributions we expect to receive from our investment in Worldwide Plaza will continue to provide adequate capital to fund our operating, administrative and other expenses incurred during liquidation. We currently estimate that our current cash balance is sufficient to cover approximately three years of net operating expenses at the Company. If by August 31, 2023, the space currently leased by Cravath, Swaine & Moore has not been sufficiently re-leased on terms that would generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy debt service requirements, the lender has the right to initiate a cash sweep and the joint venture that owns Worldwide Plaza would be restricted from making distributions under the terms of its indebtedness. If the lender initiates a cash sweep, all rent payments would be directed to the sweep account and the lender would control disbursements to cover operating expenditures and capital improvements at Worldwide Plaza. Any excess funds would be retained in a lender-controlled account to be utilized to cover future operating cash shortfall at the property. If cash flow distributions from Worldwide Plaza are suspended or lower than currently estimated, we will still be able to satisfy our current operating, administrative and other expenses; however, it is likely that liquidating distributions to our unitholders would be suspended or reduced accordingly.

Our cash flows from operating activities are primarily dependent upon the occupancy level at Worldwide Plaza, the net effective rental rates achieved on our leases, the collectability of rent, operating escalations and recoveries from our tenants at Worldwide Plaza and the level of operating and other costs, including general and administrative expenses and other expenses associated with carrying out our Liquidation Plan. Our joint venture partner in Worldwide Plaza has informed us that it does not intend to make any further current distributions to the joint venture partners and intends to reserve all cash flow. The company has filed an action for declaratory judgment in New York Supreme Court contesting our joint venture partner's right to do so.

Rent collections for retail and amenities tenants at Worldwide Plaza were not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic during the year ended December 31, 2022 though they were impacted during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. It is uncertain as to the extent of the future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including multiple variants, and government protective measures thereto on rent collections at the property for future years. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the property collected 100% of the office rents that were due. WWP has forgiven approximately $494,000 of base rents for current retail and amenities tenants and has written off approximately $477,000 of base rents related to surrendered retail and amenities space. To date, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has not been material to the Company, however, it is not possible to estimate the future impact of the pandemic at this time.

In connection with the Liquidation Plan, we plan to sell our remaining 50.1% interest in Worldwide Plaza.

During the year ended December 31, 2022 we received net distributions of $8.6 million in respect of our interest in Worldwide Plaza.

At December 31, 2022, we owned a 50.1% interest in the joint venture that owns Worldwide Plaza. In connection with the leasing of the property, the joint venture entered into agreements with its tenants to provide allowances for tenant improvements. These allowances require the joint venture to fund capital expenditures up to amounts specified in the lease agreements. Our share of capital expenditures during the year ended December 31, 2022 was funded from property cash flow.

We initially set aside approximately $90.7 million from the 2017 refinancing proceeds to cover our share of potential future leasing and capital costs at the property; as discussed in “Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies” we believe that any obligation to reserve this amount has lapsed, and we are seeking a declaratory judgment in the Delaware Court of Chancery that we are permitted to distribute the reserved funds.

Until such time as we are able to dispose of our remaining asset, the actual amount and timing of, and record dates for, future liquidating distributions will be determined by our Board of Managers and will depend upon the timing and amount of cash flow distributions we receive from our Worldwide Plaza joint venture and the amounts deemed necessary by our Board of Managers to pay or provide for our liabilities and obligations. The timing and amount of our final liquidating distribution will be dependent on the timing and proceeds of the sale of our remaining interest in Worldwide Plaza and the timing of the resolution of the litigations, discussed in “Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies.” As the Liquidating LLC is treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes, any such liquidating distributions on the Units will be deemed a return of capital.

As of December 31, 2022, we indirectly had $601.2 million of unconsolidated mortgage debt reflecting our pro rata share of Worldwide Plaza’s total mortgage debt of $1.2 billion. The Worldwide Plaza mortgage debt matures in November 2027 and requires monthly interest only payments. Operating cash flow at the property is expected to be sufficient to cover the monthly debt service payments through August 2024. If the space currently leased by Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP is not sufficiently re-leased, we expect that operating cash flow will not be sufficient to cover the debt service obligations starting in September 2024.

Our level of liquidity based upon cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash increased by approximately $1.0 million from $99.7 million at December 31, 2021 to $100.7 million at December 31, 2022.

The holders of the Predecessor’s common stock approved the Liquidation Plan, a plan to sell in an orderly manner all or substantially all of the assets of the Predecessor and New York Recovery Operating Partnership, L.P. (the "OP") and to liquidate and dissolve the Predecessor and the OP, on January 3, 2017, and we adopted the liquidation basis of accounting effective January 1, 2017. We did not make any acquisitions in new investments in 2022, and in accordance with the Liquidation Plan, no further acquisitions are expected.

Our primary sources of non-operating cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2022 include:

Our primary uses of non-operating cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2022 include:

Our primary sources of non-operating cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2021 include:

Our primary uses of non-operating cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2021 include:

We did not have any contractual debt or lease obligations as of December 31, 2022.

Since the adoption of liquidation basis accounting as of January 1, 2017, there are no results of operations. Subsequent to the adoption of the plan of liquidation, we have only one reporting and operating segment. Our remaining property asset continues to perform in a manner that is relatively consistent with prior reporting periods. We have experienced no significant changes in occupancy or rental rates at Worldwide Plaza. Changes in the liquidation value of our assets are discussed below under Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation.

Net assets in liquidation decreased by $202.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2022. The reduction was primarily due to a net decrease of $194.9 million in the estimated liquidation value of the Company’s investment in Worldwide Plaza primarily related to a decrease in value as well as a decrease in estimated distributions from working capital and property operations. The reduction was also a result of liquidating distributions to unitholders totaling $5.4 million and a $1.7 million decrease due to a remeasurement of estimated costs.

Net assets in liquidation decreased by $4.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. The reduction is primarily due to liquidating distributions to unitholders totaling $12.6 million and a $2.5 million decrease due to a remeasurement of estimated costs. The reduction in net assets was offset by a net increase of $10.8 million in the estimated liquidation value of the Company’s investment in Worldwide Plaza primarily related to the estimated distributions from working capital and property operations.

Net assets in liquidation decreased by $35.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2020. The reduction is primarily due to a $37.6 million decrease in the Company’s investment in Worldwide Plaza based on a decrease of the estimated property value of Worldwide Plaza, liquidating distributions to unitholders totaling $11.8 million and a $2.6 million decrease due to a remeasurement of estimated costs. The reduction in net assets was offset by a net increase of $16.6 million in the estimated liquidation value of the Company’s investment in Worldwide Plaza primarily related to the estimated distributions from working capital and property operations.

Net assets in liquidation at December 31, 2022, which are presented on an undiscounted basis, include Worldwide Plaza value based on estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates as well as available market information and assumptions regarding capital expenditures in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, assuming we dispose of our investment in the next 12 months, resulting in estimated future liquidating distributions of approximately $7.22 per Unit. This estimate of liquidating distributions includes projections of costs and expenses to be incurred during the next 12 months and costs to dispose of the Company’s remaining investment in WWP. Any changes in the future market value of Worldwide Plaza, if any, will be evaluated at each reporting period and will be reflected in the Statement of Net Assets in liquidation at such times. Management’s estimate, like any estimate or projection, is subject to various assumptions and uncertainties including the joint venture’s ability to execute on the business plan, tenants paying their rental obligations, the equity capital and financing markets and New York City market conditions generally.

Our audited financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are prepared on the liquidation basis of accounting and accordingly include an estimate of the liquidation value of our assets and other estimates, including estimates of anticipated cash flow, timing of asset sales and liquidation expenses. These estimates update estimates that we have previously provided. These estimates are based on multiple assumptions, some of which may prove to be incorrect, and the actual amount of

liquidating distributions we pay to you may be more or less than these estimates. We cannot assure you of the actual amount or timing of liquidating distributions you will receive pursuant to the Liquidation Plan.

We are taxed as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision or benefit for income taxes is made in the consolidated financial statements. All distributions from the Liquidating LLC will be considered a return of capital for tax purposes. Unitholders will receive a Schedule K-1 from the Liquidating LLC annually reflecting their allocable share of the Liquidating LLC’s income, loss, gains and deductions.

Many of Worldwide Plaza’s leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation. These provisions generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases either at fixed rates or indexed escalations (based on the Consumer Price Index or other measures). We may be adversely impacted by inflation on the leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions.

We have no off-balance-sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Set forth below is a summary of the significant accounting estimates and critical accounting policies that management believes are important to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Certain of our accounting estimates are particularly important for an understanding of our financial position and require the application of significant judgment by our management. As a result, these estimates are subject to a degree of uncertainty. Subsequent to the adoption of the Liquidation Plan, we are required to estimate all costs and income we expect to incur and earn through the end of liquidation including the estimated amount of cash we expect to collect on the disposal of our assets and the estimated costs to dispose of our assets.

We account for our investment in unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting because we exercise significant influence over, but do not control the entity and are not considered to be the primary beneficiary.

Under liquidation accounting, the investment in unconsolidated joint venture is recorded at its liquidation value, or net realizable value, which is comprised of an estimate of the expected sale proceeds upon disposition plus the estimated net cash flow to be received from the venture during the liquidation period. We evaluate the net realizable value of our unconsolidated joint venture at each reporting period. Any changes in net realizable value will be reflected as a change in our net assets in liquidation. The liquidation value of our remaining investment in Worldwide Plaza at December 31, 2022 is based on estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates as well as available market information and assumptions regarding capital expenditures assuming we dispose of our investment in the next 12 months.

There are no new accounting pronouncements that are applicable or relevant to the Company under the liquidation basis of accounting.

At December 31, 2022, we had $601.2 million of unconsolidated mortgage debt reflecting our pro rata share of Worldwide Plaza’s total mortgage debt of $1.2 billion. This debt consisted of fixed-rate secured mortgage notes payable. Changes in market interest rates have no impact on interest due on the notes.

The information required by this Item 8 is hereby incorporated by reference to our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto beginning on page 48 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Board of Managers, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2022. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Board of Managers have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process which was designed under the supervision of the Company’s principal executives and principal financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the Trustees of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2013) in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework.”

Based on that assessment and those criteria, management has maintained and concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2022, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The following table represents certain information with respect to our managers and executive officers as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Randolph C. Read, Manager and Chairman of the Board of Managers – Mr. Read has served as an independent manager and Chairman of the Board of Managers since November 2018. Previously, he served as an independent director of our Predecessor from December 2014 to November 2018, including as Chairman of our Predecessor’s Board of Directors from June 2015 to November 2018. Mr. Read has served as the independent Chairman of the Board of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. since August 2020, as an independent Director of SandRidge Energy, Inc. since June 2018. Mr. Read previously served as an independent director of Business Development Corporation of America (2014-2018) and as an independent director of Luby’s Inc. (2019-2021). Mr. Read has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Nevada Strategic Credit Investments, LLC since 2009. From 2007 to 2009, he served with The Greenspun Corporation, lastly as Executive Director and President, whose companies included its wholly owned subsidiary American Nevada Realty. Mr. Read has previously served as President of a variety of other companies and has previously served on a number of public and private company boards. He is admitted as a Certified Public Accountant and has an M.B.A. in Finance from the Wharton Graduate School of the University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. from Tulane University.

Mr. Read is qualified to serve on our Board of Managers based on his significant business experience as a director and an executive officer of entities in a variety of industries, as well as capital markets, governance and operations experience, in addition to his knowledge, financial expertise and leadership qualities and roles, including his experience as Chairman of our Predecessor’s Board of Directors.

Craig T. Bouchard, Manager - Mr. Bouchard has served as an independent manager since November 2018. Previously, Mr. Bouchard served as an independent director of our Predecessor from October 2016 through November 2018 and served on the nominating and corporate governance committee and the affiliated transactions committee. Mr. Bouchard currently serves as the Executive Chairman of the Board of The Ecolution Power Company (EcolutionPower.com), and is the Co-Chairman of The Space Railway Corporation (Spacerailway.com). Mr. Bouchard is a New York Times Best Selling Author, having co-authored “The Caterpillar Way: Lessons in Leadership, Growth and Stockholder Value,” Copyright 2013, (McGraw Hill, November 2013). In 2010, Mr. Bouchard founded Shale-Inland Holdings LLC (“Shale-Inland,” now known as FloWorks International), a leading distributor of stainless steel pipe, valves and fittings, and stamped and fabricated parts to the United States energy industry. Mr. Bouchard served as the Chief Executive Officer and later as the Chairman of the Board of Shale-Inland through 2012.

Before founding Shale-Inland, in 2004, Mr. Bouchard co-founded and was the President and Vice Chairman of the Board of the steel company Esmark, Inc. (NASDAQ: ESMK). Esmark was the highest appreciating stock on the NASDAQ for the full year 2008. Prior to that, from 1998 to 2003, Mr. Bouchard was the President and Chief Executive Officer of New York-based NumeriX, a risk management software company focused on managing derivative financial risk.

Prior to that, Mr. Bouchard was the Global Head of Derivatives Trading and Quantitative Research at the First National Bank of Chicago, where his career spanned 19 years.

Mr. Bouchard is currently a member of the Leadership Board of the Department of Athletics at Duke University. Mr. Bouchard served on the Board of Trustees of Boston University and on the Foundation of the University of Montana. Mr. Bouchard holds a Bachelor of Arts degree, a Master of Economics degree in Economics, and Doctor of Science, from Illinois State University where he

is in the Hall of Fame of the School of the Arts and Sciences. Mr. Bouchard has a Master of Business Administration (MBA) from the University of Chicago.

Mr. Bouchard is qualified to serve on our Board of Managers based on his extensive experience and knowledge developed through his service as an executive and in corporate management, including his service on our Predecessor’s board of directors.

Michael L. Ashner, Manager - Mr. Ashner currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Winthrop Capital Advisors, LLC, First Winthrop Corp. and Winthrop Realty Partners L.P. He formerly served as a trustee of Winthrop Realty Liquidating Trust. From December 2003 to December 2016, he served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Winthrop Realty Trust. Mr. Ashner also served as the Executive Chairman and a Trustee of Lexington Realty Trust. Prior to the merger between Lexington and Newkirk, he also served as a director and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Newkirk. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Ashner served as a director and Chief Executive Officer of Shelbourne Properties I, Inc., Shelbourne Properties II, Inc. and Shelbourne Properties III, Inc. From 2019 to 2021, he served as a director of CBL Associates & Properties, Inc. Mr. Ashner is a Trustee of the Northwell Hospital System, American Friends of Beit Ruth and a past trustee of the National World War II Museum of New Orleans. He is a graduate of Cornell University and the University of Miami School of Law.

Mr. Ashner is qualified to serve on our Board of Managers based on his extensive experience and knowledge in the real estate industry developed through his service as an executive officer and in corporate management, including his service with the companies listed above.

John Garilli, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary – Mr. Garilli has served as Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary since November 2018. Previously, Mr. Garilli served as the Chief Executive Officer of our Predecessor from July 2018 until November 2018 and as the Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of our Predecessor from March 2017 until November 2018. Mr. Garilli served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Luby’s Inc. from February 2021 until its dissolution in May 2022. Mr. Garilli has served as a Trustee of LUB Liquidating Trust, successor to Luby's Inc., since June 2022. Mr. Garilli has served as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Seritage Growth Properties since January 2022. Mr. Garilli served as Chief Financial Officer of Winthrop Realty Trust from June 2012 until its liquidation in August 2016. Mr. Garilli has been with Winthrop Capital Advisors (f/k/a First Winthrop Corporation), a real estate investment and management company and affiliate of the Winthrop Advisor since September 1995 and currently serves as its President.

There are no family relationships between any of our managers or executive officers.

Due to the Company’s limited operations and level of activity, which primarily includes the sale of our remaining asset and the payment of outstanding obligations, we have not had an audit committee or other committee that performs similar functions and, consequently, had not designated an audit committee financial expert. Given the addition to the Board of Managers of Mr. Ashner, and his affiliation with the Winthrop Advisor, on March 14, 2023, our Board of Managers created an audit committee consisting of Craig T. Bouchard and Randolph C. Read, each of whom is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Our Board of Managers has adopted a Code of Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”) which is applicable to our managers, officers and employees (with respect to employees, if applicable in the future). The Code of Ethics covers topics including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, confidentiality of information, full and fair disclosure, reporting of violations and compliance with laws and regulations. Our Advisor and its employees are subject to a separate code of ethics.

The Code of Ethics can be obtained without charge, upon request, by writing to our secretary at: New York REIT Liquidating LLC, 2 Liberty Square, 9th Floor, Boston, MA 02109, Attention: John Garilli, Secretary. A waiver of the Code of Ethics may be made only by our Board of Managers and will be promptly disclosed to the extent required by law.

We have no employees. Our Advisor performs our day-to-day management functions. For 2022 and 2021, our only named executive officer is Mr. Garilli. Mr. Garilli serves as our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Mr. Garilli is an employee of the Advisor and does not receive any compensation directly from us for serving as our executive officer. We do not reimburse our Advisor or its affiliates for salaries, bonuses or benefits incurred by these entities and paid to our named executive officers.

See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence” in Part III, Item 13 for a discussion of fees payable and expenses reimbursable to the Advisor, the Property Manager, and their affiliates under our agreements with them.

We did not determine the compensation payable to our named executive officers by our Advisor or its affiliates during the year ended December 31, 2022. As a result, we do not have, and our Board of Managers has not considered a compensation policy or program for executive officers. Accordingly, we have not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K a “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” report with respect to executive compensation or a ratio of the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer or our median employee.

The following table, footnote and related narrative summarizes the “total compensation” earned by the named executive officers for services rendered to the Company for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 during which such individuals were designated as named executive officers:

There are no outstanding equity-based awards as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation of managers who served as members of our Board of Managers during the year ended December 31, 2022:

Effective July 1, 2020, the monthly stipend paid to each Manager was reduced to $5,000 per month with the non-executive chair receiving an additional $5,000 per month. Fees earned by our managers for their services are paid quarterly in advance.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Units as of December 31, 2022 by:

Except as otherwise indicated, each unitholder listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the Units beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws. As of February 28, 2023, there were 16,791,769 Units outstanding.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the common stock of the Company to file initial reports of ownership of such securities and reports of changes in ownership of such securities with the SEC. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders of the Company are also required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required during the year ended December 31, 2022, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were timely satisfied.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Effective March 7, 2017, the Winthrop Advisor was hired as the Predecessor’s advisor. The Winthrop Advisor continues to serve as the advisor to the Liquidating LLC.

Mr. Garilli was elected as our Predecessor’s Chief Financial Officer in March 2017. On July 12, 2018, Mr. Garilli was elected as Chief Executive Officer and President while maintaining his other executive positions of the Predecessor. Mr. Garilli is employed by an affiliate of the Winthrop Advisor and holds an indirect ownership interest in the Winthrop Advisor.

Mr. Ashner was appointed as a member of the Board of Managers on November 7, 2022. Mr. Ashner serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the Winthrop Advisor.

From March 8, 2017 until November 2018, the Winthrop Advisor managed the day-to-day operations of our Predecessor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement. The Winthrop Advisor currently manages the day-to-day operations of the Company. The services provided by the Winthrop Advisor include: (i) serving as our investment and financial advisor; (ii) performing and supervising the various administrative functions necessary for the day-to-day management of our operations, including providing personnel necessary to perform such services; (iii) engaging and conducting business with consultants, accountants, lenders, attorneys, brokers and other service providers and overseeing the performance of services; (iv) overseeing acquisitions and dispositions of investments and recommending acquisitions and dispositions of investments to our Board of Managers; (v) arranging for financings and refinancings; (v) overseeing and managing our existing investments; (vi) managing accounting and other record-keeping functions; (vii) preparing and filing all reports required to be filed by it with the SEC, the IRS and other regulatory agencies; (viii) maintaining our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and (ix) monitoring compliance with our corporate-level and property-level indebtedness.

The Winthrop Advisor is charged with, among other things, implementing the Company’s plan of liquidation, to sell all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its OP and to liquidate and dissolve the Company and the OP (the “Liquidation Plan”). The Liquidation Plan was approved by the Board of Directors on August 22, 2016 and by our stockholders on January 3, 2017. We expect to sell or transfer all our assets, pay or provide for our liabilities and expenses, distribute the remaining proceeds of the liquidation of our assets to our stockholders or unitholders, wind up our operations and dissolve. The actual amounts and times of future liquidating distributions to our unitholders pursuant to the Liquidation Plan will be determined by our Board of Managers at its discretion.

The following table sets forth the various fees and expenses paid by us to the Winthrop Advisor during the year ended December 31, 2022:

The activities of the Liquidating LLC are administered by the Winthrop Advisor pursuant to the terms of an advisory agreement, as amended, the “Advisory Agreement” between the Company and the Winthrop Advisor.

The Advisory Agreement is subject to automatic one-month renewal periods on the expiration of any renewal term, unless terminated by a majority of the Board of Managers or the Winthrop Advisor, upon written notice 45 days before the expiration of any renewal term and will automatically terminate at the effective time of the final disposition of the assets held by the Company. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated upon 15 days written notice by a majority of the Board of Managers if the Company’s chief executive officer resigns or is otherwise unavailable to serve as the Company’s chief executive officer for any reason and the Winthrop Advisor has not proposed a new chief executive officer acceptable to a majority of the Board of Managers.

From the Liquidation Date through July 31, 2020, the Company paid to the Winthrop Advisor a monthly fee of $100,000 and a supplemental fee of $50,000 per quarter (prorated for any partial quarter) for any period that the principal executive and financial officers of the successor entity to the Company are required to certify the financial and other information contained in the successor entity’s quarterly and annual reports pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. On October 30, 2020, the Advisory Agreement was amended to reduce the monthly fee payable to Winthrop Advisor to $83,000 effective August 1, 2020. All other terms of the Advisory Agreement remained the same.

In connection with the adoption of liquidation accounting, the Company accrues costs it expects to incur through the end of liquidation. At December 31, 2022, the Company has accrued asset management fees totaling $1.2 million payable to Winthrop Advisor representing management’s estimate of future asset management fees to final liquidation, provided there is no assurance that the contract will continue to be extended at the same terms, if at all. This amount is included in estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation.

In connection with the payment of (i) any distributions of money or other property by the Company to its stockholders or unitholders during the term of the Current Advisory Agreement and (ii) any other amounts paid to the Company’s stockholders or unitholders on account of their shares of common stock or membership interests in the LLC in connection with a merger or other change in control transaction pursuant to an agreement with the Predecessor entered into after March 8, 2017 (such distributions and payments, the “Hurdle Payments”), in excess of $110.00 per share (adjusted for the Reverse Split, the “Hurdle Amount”), when taken together with all other Hurdle Payments, the Company will pay an incentive fee to Winthrop Advisor in an amount equal to 10.0% of such excess (the “Incentive Fee”). The Hurdle Amount will be increased on an annualized basis by an amount equal to the product of (a) the Treasury Rate plus 200 basis points and (b) the Hurdle Amount minus all previous Hurdle Payments. Based on the current estimated undiscounted net assets in liquidation, the Winthrop Advisor would not be entitled to receive any such incentive fee.

On June 30, 2020, the Company entered into a Manager Designation Agreement (the “Manager DesignationAgreement”) with WW Investors LLC, (“WW Investors”), an affiliate of the Winthrop Advisor, which owned, as of the date of the Manager Designation Agreement, 132,774 Units in the aggregate. The Manager Designation Agreement provided that Howard Goldberg, then a member of the Board, was to be deemed to be WW Investors’ designee on the Board and further provided that for so long as they are not in breach of the Manager Designation Agreement, WW Investors shall be entitled to recommend a replacement nominee to the Board to fill a vacancy on the Board resulting from Mr. Goldberg’s resignation, death or disability, subject to the approval of the Board in its reasonable discretion. On November 7, 2022, Mr. Goldberg resigned from the Board of Managers. On November 9, 2022, Michael L. Ashner was appointed as a member of the Board of Managers. Furthermore, pursuant to the Manager Designation Agreement, WW Investors, and their affiliates agree to certain standstill restrictions until the earlier of (A) such time that WW Investors’ Board designee is removed and the Company fails to seat a replacement pursuant to the Manager Designation Agreement, (B) the Winthrop Advisor is replaced as the Company’s advisor and (C) the later of (i) 14 months from the date of the Manager Designation Agreement and (ii) such time as a WW Investor designee is no longer a member of the Board.

KPMG LLP has been selected to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2022. Prior to the formation of the Audit Committee in March 2023, KPMG LLP reported directly to our Board of Managers. The Board of Managers participated in and approved the decision to appoint KPMG LLP for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Subsequent to the formation of the Audit Committee, KPMG LLP reports directly to our Audit Committee.

Audit fees charged by KPMG LLP related to the audits of our consolidated financial statements for each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $360,000 and $300,000 which were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

There were no audit related fees billed by KPMG LLP for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

There were no tax fees billed by KPMG for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

There were no other fees billed by KPMG LLP for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 31st day of March 2023.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this annual report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of net assets of New York REIT Liquidating LLC and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022 and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, net assets in liquidation as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and the changes in net assets in liquidation for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Evaluation of the expected sales proceeds upon disposition of underlying real estate

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company records the investment in unconsolidated joint venture at its liquidation value, or net realizable value, which is comprised of an estimate of the expected sale proceeds upon disposition plus the estimated net cash flow from the venture during the liquidation period. The Company evaluates the net realizable value of its unconsolidated joint venture at each reporting period and any changes in net realizable value are reflected as a change in the Company’s net assets in liquidation. The investment in unconsolidated joint venture represents an equity interest in Worldwide Plaza and its expected sale proceeds is determined using estimated cash flow projections utilizing discount and capitalization rates as well as available market information and assumptions regarding capital expenditures. The liquidation value of the Company’s investment in unconsolidated joint venture was $22.7 million as of December 31, 2022.

We identified the evaluation of the expected sales proceeds upon disposition of the underlying real estate included in the Company’s liquidation value of its investment in unconsolidated joint venture as a critical audit matter. A high degree of subjective auditor judgement, as well as specialized skills and knowledge, was required in applying procedures and evaluating results from such procedures over the discounted cash flow method used to calculate the expected sales proceeds upon disposition of the underlying real estate. This included significant assumptions related to the discount rate, terminal capitalization rate, market rent, and capital expenditures, which also had a significant effect on the determination of liquidation value of the underlying real estate.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of certain internal controls related to the Company’s process to evaluate the expected sales proceeds upon disposition of the underlying real estate included in the Company’s liquidation value of its investment in its unconsolidated joint venture, including controls related to the development of the significant assumptions noted above. We assessed the Company’s estimate of future capital expenditures by inspecting their written plans and evaluating that they have the financial resources to carry out their plans. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in assessing:

We evaluated the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained related to the expected sales proceeds upon disposition of the underlying real estate by assessing the results of procedures performed.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – Liquidation Plan

The Liquidation Plan provides for an orderly sale of the Company’s assets, payment of the Company’s liabilities and other obligations and the winding down of operations and dissolution of the Company. The Predecessor was not, and the Company is not, permitted to make any new investments except to make protective acquisitions or advances with respect to its existing assets (see Note 6). The Company is permitted to satisfy any existing contractual obligations and fund required tenant improvements and capital expenditures at its real estate property owned by the joint venture in which the Company owns an interest.

The Liquidation Plan enables the Company to sell any and all of its assets without further approval of the unitholders and provides that liquidating distributions be made to the unitholders as determined by the Company’s board of managers (the “Board of Managers”). In order to comply with applicable laws, the Predecessor converted into the Company, a limited liability company. The conversion of the Predecessor to a limited liability company was approved by the stockholders on September 7, 2018 and became effective on November 7, 2018.

In October 2018, the Predecessor announced the withdrawal of its common stock from listing on the NYSE in connection with the conversion. November 2, 2018 was the last day on which shares of its common stock were traded on the NYSE and our stock transfer books were closed as of 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on such date. At the effective time of the conversion, each outstanding share of common stock was converted into one unit of common membership interest in the Liquidating LLC (a “Unit”), and holders of shares of the Predecessor’s common stock automatically received one Unit (which Unit was in book entry form) for each share of the common stock held by such stockholder. Unlike shares of the Predecessors common stock, which, in addition to being listed on the NYSE, were freely transferable, Units are not listed for trading and generally are not transferable except by will, intestate succession or operation of law. Therefore, the holders of Units do not have the ability to realize any value from these interests except from distributions made by the Company, the timing of which will be solely in the discretion of the Board of Managers.

The Board of Managers was initially comprised of three members: Randolph C. Read, Craig T. Bouchard and Howard Goldberg. On November 7, 2022, Howard Goldberg resigned from the Board of Managers, effective immediately, pursuant to the terms of the Limited Liability Agreement of the Company and not as a result of any disagreement with the operations, policies or

NEW YORK REIT LIQUIDATING LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021 AND 2020

practices of the Company. On November 9, 2022, Michael L. Ashner was appointed as a member of the Board of Managers. As of November 9, 2022, the Board of Managers is comprised of Randolph C. Read, Craig T. Bouchard and Michael L. Ashner.

The Company is deemed to be the same entity as the Predecessor with the same assets and liabilities as the Predecessor. In addition, the charter and bylaws of the Predecessor were replaced by the operating agreement of the Company. For tax purposes, the fair value of each Unit in the Company received by stockholders when the conversion became effective, which reflects the value of the remaining assets of the Company (net of liabilities), was equal to the average of the high and low trading prices for shares of the Predecessor’s common stock on the last three days on which the shares were traded on the NYSE.

The business of the Company is the same as the business of the Predecessor immediately preceding the conversion, which, consistent with the Liquidation Plan, consists of the continued ownership of the Predecessor’s interest in Worldwide Plaza, the only remaining property-related asset. Under its operating agreement, the business and affairs of the Company will be managed by or under the direction of its Board of Managers, and the sole purpose is winding up the affairs of the Company and the liquidation of its remaining asset. On March 14, 2022, pursuant to the terms of the operating agreement of the Company, the Board of Managers extended the term of the Company such that the Company will remain in existence until the earlier of (i) the distribution of all Company assets pursuant to liquidation, or (ii) December 31, 2023. The term may be extended to such later date as the Board of Managers determines is reasonably necessary to fulfill the purposes of the Company.

The dissolution process and the amount and timing of future distributions to unitholders involves risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, it is not possible to predict the timing or aggregate amount which will be ultimately distributed to unitholders and no assurance can be given that the distributions will equal or exceed the estimate of net assets presented in the Consolidated Statement of Net Assets.

Note 3 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Rent collections for retail and amenities tenants at Worldwide Plaza were not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic during the years ended December 31, 2022, thought they were impacted during the year ended December 31, 2021. It is uncertain as to the extent of the future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its multiple variants and government protective measures thereto on rent collections at the property for future quarters. WWP has forgiven of approximately $494,000 of base rents for current retail and amenities tenants and has written off approximately $477,000 of base rents related to surrendered retail and amenities space. To date, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has not been material to Worldwide Plaza, however, it is not possible to estimate the future impact of the pandemic at this time.

Liquidation Basis of Accounting

As a result of the approval of the Liquidation Plan by the stockholders, the Company adopted the liquidation basis of accounting as of January 1, 2017 and for the periods subsequent to December 31, 2016 in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, on January 1, 2017, the carrying value of the Company’s assets were adjusted to their liquidation value, which represented the estimated amount of cash that the Company expected to collect on disposal of assets as it carried out its liquidation activities under the Liquidation Plan. All properties have been sold except the remaining interest in Worldwide Plaza. For purposes of liquidation accounting, which requires estimating go-forward revenues and expenses including net sale proceeds, the Company’s estimate of net assets in liquidation value assumes a sale of Worldwide Plaza at December 31, 2023 which is the end of our current projected liquidation period as

NEW YORK REIT LIQUIDATING LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021 AND 2020

discussed below. The actual timing of sale has not yet been determined and is subject to future events and uncertainties. These estimates are subject to change based on the actual timing of sale of the Company’s remaining property.

Liabilities are carried at their contractual amounts due as adjusted for the timing and other assumptions related to the liquidation process.

The Company accrues costs and revenues that it expects to incur and earn as it carries out its liquidation activities through the end of the projected liquidation period to the extent it has a reasonable basis for estimation. Under the liquidation basis of accounting, it is generally accepted that the period of time to assume a reasonable basis for estimation would not exceed one year from the reporting date. As such, our current projected liquidation period ends on December 31, 2023. Estimated costs expected to be incurred through the end of the liquidation period include corporate overhead costs associated with satisfying known and contingent liabilities and other costs associated with the winding down and dissolution of the Company. Revenues are based on current interest rate assumptions. These amounts are classified as a net liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation on the Consolidated Statements of Net Assets. Actual costs and revenues may differ from amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements due to the inherent uncertainty in estimating future events. These differences may be material. See Note 4 for further discussion. Actual costs incurred but unpaid as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Net Assets.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries and consolidated joint venture arrangements in which the Company has controlling financial interests, either through voting or similar rights or by means other than voting rights if the Company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The portions of any consolidated joint venture arrangements not owned by the Company would be presented as noncontrolling interests. There were no consolidated joint venture arrangements at December 31, 2022 or 2021. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company evaluates its relationships and investments to determine if it has variable interests in a VIE. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity’s expected losses or receive portions of the entity’s expected residual returns. If the Company determines that it has a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether such interest is in a VIE. A VIE is broadly defined as an entity where either (1) the equity investors as a group, if any, lack the power through voting or similar rights to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance or (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company consolidates any VIEs when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE’s operations.

A variable interest holder is considered to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate its joint venture. In determining whether the Company has a controlling interest in a joint venture and the requirement to consolidate the accounts of that entity, management considers factors such as ownership interest, power to make decisions and contractual and substantive participating rights of the partners or members as well as whether the entity is a VIE for which the Company is the primary beneficiary.

Use of Estimates

Certain of the Company’s accounting estimates are particularly important for an understanding of the Company’s financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by management. As a result, these estimates are subject to a degree of uncertainty. Under liquidation accounting, the Company is required to estimate all costs and revenue it expects to incur and earn through the end of liquidation including the estimated amount of cash it expects to collect on the disposal of its assets and the estimated costs to dispose of its assets. All of the estimates and evaluations are susceptible to change and actual results could differ materially from the estimates and evaluations.

NEW YORK REIT LIQUIDATING LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021 AND 2020

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company deposits cash with high-quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (the “FDIC”) up to an insurance limit. The Company’s cash balances fluctuate throughout the year and may exceed insured limits from time to time. Although the Company bears risk to amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it does not anticipate any losses as a result.

Restricted Cash

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, management has included in restricted cash $92.1 million. Of this sum, $90.7 million has been reserved either for potential capital improvement work at Worldwide Plaza, should the Company elect to contribute, or to be paid as a liquidating distribution to unitholders. The remaining $1.4 million is being held in escrow in connection with the sale of the Viceroy Hotel (the “Viceroy Escrow”). The Viceroy Escrow was established from proceeds of the sale of the Viceroy Hotel and was required to cover a potential seller’s obligation to fund any shortfalls to the New York Hotel Pension Fund should the purchaser of the property withdraw from the Pension Fund without fully funding the then outstanding shortfall due the Pension Fund. The Viceroy Escrow is set to expire in October 2023, and the funds will be used to satisfy the liabilities under agreement or will be distributed to unitholders.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

The Company accounts for its investment in unconsolidated joint venture under the equity method of accounting because the Company exercises significant influence over but does not control the entity and is not considered to be the primary beneficiary.

The investment in unconsolidated joint venture is recorded at its liquidation value, or net realizable value, which is comprised of an estimate of the expected sale proceeds upon disposition plus the estimated net income from the venture during the liquidation period. The Company evaluates the net realizable value of its unconsolidated joint venture at each reporting period. Any changes in net realizable value will be reflected as a change in the Company’s net assets in liquidation. The liquidation value of the Company’s remaining investment in Worldwide Plaza as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 is based on estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates as well as available market information and assumptions regarding capital expenditures.

Revenue Recognition

The Company has no revenue sources other than interest income which are classified in liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation on the Consolidated Statement of Net Assets.

Income Taxes

The Predecessor qualified as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code effective for its taxable year ended December 31, 2010 through November 7, 2018, the date of the conversion. In order to qualify for taxation as a REIT, the Predecessor was generally required, among other things, to distribute annually at least 90% of the Company’s REIT taxable income to the Company’s stockholders. The Predecessor distributed to its stockholders amounts in excess of 100% of its REIT taxable income for the period January 1, 2018 through November 7, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2017.

From and after November 8, 2018, the Company is taxed as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision or benefit for income taxes is made in the consolidated financial statements. All future distributions from the Company will be considered a return of capital for tax purposes. Holder of Units will receive a Schedule K-1 from the Company annually reflecting their allocable share of the Company’s income, loss, gain and deduction.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Predecessor purchased a hotel, which was owned by a subsidiary of the OP and leased to a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”), that was owned by the OP. The hotel was sold on October 4, 2018, and the TRS was terminated. A TRS is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. The TRS was a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities.

As of December 31, 2022, the Predecessor had no material uncertain income tax positions. The tax years subsequent to and including the year ended December 31, 2018 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company and the Predecessor is subject.

NEW YORK REIT LIQUIDATING LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021 AND 2020

Reportable Segments

The Company has determined that it has one reportable segment, with activities related to investing in real estate through a joint venture. The Company’s joint venture invests in real estate which generates rental revenue and other income through the leasing of the property. Management evaluates the operating performance of the Company’s investment at the individual property level.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

There are no recently issued accounting pronouncements that are applicable under liquidation basis accounting.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

None.

Note 4—Liability for Estimated Costs in Excess of Estimated Receipts During Liquidation

The liquidation basis of accounting requires the Company to estimate net cash flows from operations and to accrue all costs associated with implementing and completing the plan of liquidation. The Company currently estimates that it will have costs in excess of estimated receipts during the liquidation. These amounts can vary significantly due to, among other things, the timing and estimates for operating expenses, interest earned on reserves and the costs associated with the winding down of operations. These costs are estimated and are anticipated to be paid out over the liquidation period.

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company accrued the following expenses expected to be incurred during liquidation (in thousands):


	2022			2021
General and administrative expenses	$	(1,420	)	$	(2,384	)
Liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation	$	(1,420	)	$	(2,384	)

The change in the liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows (in thousands):


	January 1, 2021			Net Change in Working Capital (1)		Remeasurement of Assets and Liabilities			December 31, 2022
General and administrative expenses	$	(2,384	)	$	2,654	$	(1,690	)	$	(1,420	)
Total liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation	$	(2,384	)	$	2,654	$	(1,690	)	$	(1,420	)

(1)

Represents changes in cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses as a result of the Company’s operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2022.


	January 1, 2020			Net Change in Working Capital (1)		Remeasurement of Assets and Liabilities			December 31, 2021
General and administrative expenses	$	(2,342	)	$	2,491	$	(2,533	)	$	(2,384	)
Total liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation	$	(2,342	)	$	2,491	$	(2,533	)	$	(2,384	)

(1)

Represents changes in cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses as a result of the Company’s operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Note 6 — Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

On October 30, 2013, the Predecessor purchased a 48.9% equity interest in Worldwide Plaza for a contract purchase price of $220.1 million, based on the property value at that time for Worldwide Plaza of $1.3 billion less $875.0 million of debt on the property.

On June 1, 2017, the Predecessor acquired an additional 49.9% equity interest on exercise of the WWP Option pursuant to the Company’s rights under the joint venture agreement of Worldwide Plaza for a contract purchase price of $276.7 million, based on the option price of approximately $1.4 billion less $875.0 million of debt on the property. The Predecessor’s joint venture partner exercised its right to retain 1.2% of the aggregate membership interests in Worldwide Plaza. Following the exercise of the option, the Predecessor owned a total equity interest of 98.8% in Worldwide Plaza.

On October 18, 2017, the Predecessor sold a 48.7% interest in Worldwide Plaza to a joint venture managed by SL Green Realty Corp. and RXR Realty LLC based on an estimated underlying property value of $1.725 billion. In conjunction with the equity sale, there was a concurrent $1.2 billion refinancing of the existing Worldwide Plaza debt. The Predecessor received cash at closing of approximately $446.5 million from the sale and excess proceeds from the financing, net of closing costs which included $108.3 million of defeasance and prepayment costs. The new debt on Worldwide Plaza bears interest at a blended rate of approximately 3.98% per annum, requires monthly payments of interest only and matures in November 2027. If by August 31, 2023, the space currently leased by Cravath, Swaine & Moore has not been sufficiently re-leased on terms that would generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy debt service requirements, the joint venture that owns Worldwide Plaza would be restricted from making distributions under the terms of its indebtedness.

NEW YORK REIT LIQUIDATING LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021 AND 2020

The Company initially set aside approximately $90.7 million from the 2017 refinancing proceeds to cover our share of potential future leasing and capital costs at the property; as discussed in “Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies,” the Company believes that there is no obligation to reserve this amount, and even if such an obligation existed, it has lapsed and we are seeking a declaratory judgment in the Delaware Court of Chancery that we are permitted to distribute the reserved funds. Following the sale of its interest discussed above, the Company now holds a 50.1% interest in Worldwide Plaza. The Company has determined that this investment is an investment in a VIE. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of this VIE since the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. The Company accounts for this investment using the equity method of accounting.

The lease with one of the tenants at the Worldwide Plaza property contains a right of first offer in the event that Worldwide Plaza sells 100% of the property. The right requires Worldwide Plaza to offer the tenant the option to purchase 100% of the Worldwide Plaza property, at the price, and on other material terms, proposed by Worldwide Plaza to third parties. If, after a 45-day period, that tenant does not accept the offer, Worldwide Plaza may then sell the property to a third party, provided that Worldwide Plaza will be required to re-offer the property to that tenant if it desires to sell the property for a purchase price (and other economic consideration) less than 92.5% of the initial purchase price contained in the offer to that tenant.

The following table lists the tenants whose annualized cash rent represented greater than 10% of total annualized cash rent at the Company as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, including annualized cash rent related to the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture:


		December 31,
Property Portfolio	Tenant	2022			2021			2020
Worldwide Plaza	Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP		50	%		48	%		48	%
Worldwide Plaza	Nomura Holdings America, Inc.		29	%		30	%		31	%

The termination, delinquency or non-renewal of any of the above tenants may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations. The lease with Cravath, Swaine & Moore expires in August 2024 and the tenant has informed Worldwide Plaza that they do not intend to enter into a new lease upon expiration of the existing lease.

The amounts reflected in the following tables are based on the financial information of Worldwide Plaza. Under liquidation accounting, equity investments are carried at net realizable value.

NEW YORK REIT LIQUIDATING LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021 AND 2020

The condensed balance sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 for Worldwide Plaza are as follows:


	December 31,
(In thousands)	2022			2021
Real estate assets, at cost	$	846,124		$	840,798
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(298,953	)		(281,011	)
Total real estate assets, net		547,171			559,787
Cash and cash equivalents		47,613			53,351
Other assets		126,811			122,921
Total assets	$	721,595		$	736,059
Debt	$	1,241,903		$	1,271,177
Other liabilities		240,428			181,005
Total liabilities		1,482,331			1,452,182
Deficit		(760,736	)		(716,123	)
Total liabilities and deficit	$	721,595		$	736,059

The condensed statements of operations for the years ended December 2022, 2021 and 2020 for Worldwide Plaza are as follows:


	December 31,
(In thousands)	2022			2021			2020
Rental income	$	142,201		$	150,815		$	135,435
Operating expenses:
Operating expenses		67,626			65,845			65,396
Depreciation and amortization		20,884			29,440			21,004
Total operating expenses		88,510			95,285			86,400
Operating income		53,691			55,530			49,035
Interest expense		(80,823	)		(78,892	)		(77,265	)
Net loss allocated to non-controlling interest		30,227			34,489			35,621
Net income	$	3,095		$	11,127		$	7,391

Note 9 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements

The activities of the Liquidating LLC are administered by the Winthrop Advisor pursuant to the terms of an advisory agreement, as amended, (the “Advisory Agreement”) between the Company and the Winthrop Advisor.

From the Liquidation Date through July 31, 2020, the Company paid the Winthrop Advisor a monthly fee of $100,000 and a supplemental fee of $50,000 per quarter (prorated for any partial quarter) for any period that the principal executive and financial officers of the successor entity to the Company are required to certify the financial and other information contained in the successor entity’s quarterly and annual reports pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. On October 30, 2020, the Advisory Agreement was amended to reduce the monthly fee payable to Winthrop Advisor to $83,000 effective August 1, 2020. All other terms of the Advisory Agreement remained unchanged.

In connection with the adoption of liquidation accounting, the Company accrues costs it expects to incur through the end of liquidation. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 the Company has accrued asset management fees and compensation reimbursements totaling $1.2 million payable to Winthrop Advisor representing management’s estimate of future asset management fees to final liquidation, provided there is no assurance that the contract will continue to be extended at the same terms, if at all. This amount is included in estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation.

NEW YORK REIT LIQUIDATING LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2022, 2021 AND 2020

In connection with the payment of (i) any distributions of money or other property by the Company to its stockholders or unitholders during the term of the Advisory Agreement and (ii) any other amounts paid to the Company’s stockholders or unitholders on account of their shares of common stock or membership interests in the Company in connection with a merger or other change in control transaction pursuant to an agreement with the Company entered into after March 8, 2017 (such distributions and payments, the “Hurdle Payments”), in excess of $110.00 per share (adjusted for the Reverse Split, the “Hurdle Amount”), when taken together with all other Hurdle Payments, the Company will pay an incentive fee to Winthrop Advisor in an amount equal to 10.0% of such excess (the “Incentive Fee”). The Hurdle Amount will be increased on an annualized basis by an amount equal to the product of (a) the Treasury Rate plus 200 basis points and (b) the Hurdle Amount minus all previous Hurdle Payments. Based on the current estimated undiscounted net assets in liquidation, the Winthrop Advisor would not be entitled to receive any such incentive fee.

The Company paid the Winthrop Advisor $1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

On June 30, 2020, the Company entered into a Manager Designation Agreement (the “Manager DesignationAgreement”) with WW Investors LLC, (“WW Investors”), an affiliate of the Winthrop Advisor, which owned, as of the date of the Manager Designation Agreement, 132,774 Units in the aggregate. The Manager Designation Agreement provided that Howard Goldberg, who was a member of the Board at the time, was deemed to be WW Investors’ designee on the Board and further provides that for so long as they are not in breach of the Manager Designation Agreement, WW Investors shall be entitled to recommend a replacement nominee to the Board to fill a vacancy on the Board resulting from Mr. Goldberg’s resignation, death or disability, subject to the approval of the Board in its reasonable discretion. On November 7, 2022, Mr. Goldberg resigned from the Board of Managers. On November 9, 2022, Michael L. Ashner was appointed as a member of the Board of Managers. Furthermore, pursuant to the Manager Designation Agreement, WW Investors, and their affiliates agree to certain standstill restrictions until the earlier of (A) such time that WW Investors’ Board designee is removed and the Company fails to seat a replacement pursuant to the Manager Designation Agreement, (B) the Winthrop Advisor is replaced as the Company’s advisor and (C) the later of (i) 14 months from the date of the Manager Designation Agreement and (ii) such time as a WW Investor designee is no longer a member of the Board.



Delaware	83-2426528
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)

2 Liberty Square, 9th Floor, Boston, MA	02109
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
(617) 570-4750
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
N/A	N/A	N/A


Property	Ownership			Rentable Sq. Ft.		Percent Occupied			Annualized Cash Base Rent (in thousands)		Annualized Cash Base Rent Per Sq. Ft. (in thousands)		Number of Leases
Worldwide Plaza - Office		50.1	%		923,228		90.8	%	$	57,485	$	68.21		15
Worldwide Plaza - Retail		50.1	%		122,140		98.5	%		2,093		17.76		8
Total/Weighted Average					1,045,369		91.7	%	$	59,578	$	62.00		23


Year of Expiration	Number of Leases Expiring		Expiring Annualized Cash Rent [1]		Expiring Annualized Cash Rent as a Percentage of the Total [1]			Leased Rentable Square Feet		Percentage of Leased Rentable Sq. Ft. Expiring
2023		—		—		—			—		—
2024		3		30,314		50.7	%		310,582		30.0	%
2025		1		1,220		2.0	%		19,276		1.8	%
2026		2		2,825		4.7	%		51,942		5.0	%
2027		3		1,122		1.9	%		82,858		7.9	%
2028		1		94	<1.0%				11	<1.0%
2029		2		244	<1.0%				1,156	<1.0%
2030		1		—		—			19,528		1.9	%
2031		4		3,880		6.5	%		56,846		5.4	%
2032		2		1,558		2.6	%		30,847		2.9	%
Total		19	$	41,257		65.8	%		573,046		53.8	%


Tenant	Rented Sq. Ft. [1]		Rented Sq. Ft. as a % of Total			Lease Expiration	Remaining Lease Term [2]		Renewal Options	Annualized Cash Base Rent [1]
Nomura Holdings America, Inc.		353,250		34	%	9/2033		10.8	[3]	$	17,210
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP		309,385		30	%	8/2024		1.7	None	$	30,188



Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒

Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐

		Emerging growth company	☐



		Page
Part I
Item 1.	Business	5
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	8
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	20
Item 2.	Properties	20
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	21
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	22

Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	23
Item 6.	[Reserved]	24
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	30
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	31
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	31
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	31
Item 9B.	Other Information	31

Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	32
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	34
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	35
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	36
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	38

Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	39
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	41

Signatures		42


Tenant	Percentage of Annualized Cash Base Rent
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, LLP [1]		50	%
Nomura Holdings America, Inc. [1]		29	%


	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
2022
Cash dividends paid per unit (1)	$	0.19	$	0.10	$	0.03	$	—
2021
Cash dividends paid per unit (1)	$	0.18	$	0.25	$	0.13	$	0.19
2020
Cash dividends paid per unit (1)	$	0.10	$	0.10	$	0.25	$	0.25



Name	Age	Position Held

Randolph C. Read	70	Chairman of the Board, Manager
Craig T. Bouchard	67	Manager
Michael L. Ashner	70	Manager
John Garilli	58	Chief Executive Officer, President,
		Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Total
John Garilli,	2022	$	—	$	—
Chief Executive Officer, President and	2021		—		—
Chief Financial Officer	2020		—		—


Name	Fees Paid in Cash		Total Compensation
Craig Bouchard	$	60,000	$	60,000
Howard Goldberg		60,000		60,000
Randolph C. Read		120,000		120,000
Michael L. Ashner		15,000		15,000


Beneficial Owner (1)	Numbers of Units Beneficially Owned		Percent of Class
Joseph Moinian (2)		1,678,417		10.0	%
Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (3)		1,649,082		9.8	%
Indaba Capital Management LP (4)		1,645,561		9.8	%
TSSP Sub-Fund HoldCo (5)		1,645,493		9.8	%
Morgan Stanley Co. LLC (6)		1,515,000		9.0	%
Davidson Kempner Capital Mgmt LP (7)		1,415,223		8.4	%
683 Capital Management LLC (8)		938,730		5.6	%
Michael Ashner (9)		92,400	*
John A. Garilli		4,000	*
Randolph C. Read		1,849	*
Craig T. Bouchard		493	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (4 persons)		98,742	*


		Page Number
1.	Financial Statements – Part II, Item 8, Financial Statement and Supplementary Data	31

2.	Exhibits: See accompanying Exhibit Index	40



Exhibit No.	Description

2.1 (8)	Plan of Liquidation

2.2 (9)	Amendment to Plan of Liquidation

3.1 (4)	Articles of Conversion of New York REIT, Inc.

3.2 (4)	Certificate of Conversion of New York REIT, Inc.

3.3 (4)	Certificate of Formation of New York REIT Liquidating LLC

3.4 (4)	Limited Liability Company Agreement of New York Liquidating LLC, dated as of November 7, 2018

4.1 (5)	Description of Units

10.1 (1)	Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2016, by and among New York REIT, Inc., New York Recovery Operating Partnership, L.P. and Winthrop REIT Advisors LLC

10.4 (3)	Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of WWP Holdings, LLC dated October 18, 2017

10.5 (6)	Amendment No. 2 to Advisory Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2018, among New York REIT, Inc., New York Recovery Operating Partnership, L.P. and Winthrop REIT Advisors LLC

10.6 (7)	Amendment No. 3 to Advisory Agreement dated as of August 7, 2018, among New York REIT Inc., New York Recovery Operating Partnership, L.P. and Winthrop REIT Advisors LLC

10.7 (10)	Indemnification Agreement dated November 13, 2018, between New York REIT Liquidating LLC and Randolph C. Read

10.8 (10)	Indemnification Agreement dated November 13, 2018, between New York REIT Liquidating LLC and Craig T. Bouchard

10.9 *	Indemnification Agreement dated March 30, 2023, between New York REIT Liquidating LLC and Michael L. Ashner

10.10 (10)	Indemnification Agreement dated November 13, 2018, between New York REIT Liquidating LLC and John Garilli

10.11 (11)	Manager Designation Agreement dated June 30, 2020 by and among New York Liquidating LLC and the WW Investors party thereto

10.12 (12)	Amendment No. 4 to Advisory Agreement dated as of October 30, 2020, among New York REIT Liquidating LLC and Winthrop REIT Advisors LLC

21.1 *	Subsidiaries of New York REIT Liquidating LLC

23.1 *	Consent of KPMG LLP

31.1 *	Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of New York REIT Liquidating LLC pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1 *	Written statement of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of New York REIT Liquidating LLC pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101 *	The following materials from New York REIT Liquidating LLC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Net Assets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets, and (iii) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).


Asset Management Fees		$	1,200,000



/s/ Randolph C. Read Randolph C. Read	Manager	March 31, 2023

/s/ Craig T. Bouchard Craig T. Bouchard	Manager	March 31, 2023

/s/ Michael L. Ashner Michael L. Ashner	Manager	March 31, 2023



	Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	44

Consolidated Statements of Net Assets (Liquidation Basis) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021	46

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets (Liquidation Basis) for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020	47

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	48


	December 31, 2022		December 31, 2021
Assets
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture	$	22,692	$	226,175
Cash and cash equivalents		8,192		7,535
Restricted cash		92,538		92,127
Total Assets		123,422		325,837
Liabilities
Liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation		1,420		2,384
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		841		342
Total Liabilities		2,261		2,726
Commitments and Contingencies
Net assets in liquidation	$	121,161	$	323,111


	December 31, 2022			December 31, 2021			December 31, 2020
Net assets in liquidation, beginning of period	$	323,111		$	327,390		$	362,791
Changes in net assets in liquidation:
Changes in liquidation value of investment in unconsolidated joint venture		(194,888	)		10,848			(21,065	)
Remeasurement of assets and liabilities		(1,690	)		(2,533	)		(2,582	)
Net increase (decrease) in liquidation value		(196,578	)		8,315			(23,647	)
Liquidating distributions to unitholders/common stockholders		(5,372	)		(12,594	)		(11,754	)
Changes in net assets in liquidation		(201,950	)		(4,279	)		(35,401	)
Net assets in liquidation, end of period	$	121,161		$	323,111		$	327,390