UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x

Annual report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.2021

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

 

Commission File Number: o001-36247Transition report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (No fee required)

Meta Materials Inc.

For the transition period from _______ to _______.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Commission file number000-53473

 

Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant in its charter)

Nevada74-3237581

Nevada

74-3237581

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Organization)

 

5700 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 3600

Plano1 Research Drive

Dartmouth, TexasNova Scotia

75093B2Y 4M9

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (902) 482-5729

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(214)432-8002
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock ($0.001 Par Value)
(Title of Each Class)each class

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Trading

Symbol(s)

(Name of each exchange

on which registered)registered

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

MMAT

Nasdaq Capital Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrantRegistrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes oYesNo x

Indicate by check mark if the registrantRegistrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes oYesNox

1

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrantRegistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesxNoo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrantRegistrant was required to submit such files). YesxNoo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

o

Accelerated Filerfiler

o

Non-accelerated Filerfiler

x

Smaller Reporting Companyreporting company

x

Emerging growth company

o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes oYesNo x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stockequity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2020, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter,Registrant, based on the closing price of the shares of common stock on that dateJune 30, 2021, was $1,523,026,255.

The number of $0.3625 on the Nasdaqshares of Registrant’s Common Stock Market, was approximately $outstanding as of March 1, 2022 is 28,337,186284,812,797.

 

At March 18, 2021, there were DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

145,313,667 sharesThe information called for by Part III of this Form 10-K will be included in an amendment to this Form 10-K, which will be filed within 120 days after the registrant’s common stock outstanding (the only class of common stock).fiscal year ended.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Table of Contents

Page

PART I

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

9

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

17

Item 2.

Properties

18

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

19

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

20

PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

21

Item 6.

[Reserved]

22

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

23

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

32

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

32

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

82

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

82

Item 9B.

Other Information

84

Item 9C.

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

84

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

84

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

84

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

84

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

84

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

84

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

84

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

86

 

None.2


2

NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements include, among other things, statements regarding plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements, which arecontained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K other than statements of historical facts. Forward-lookingfact, including statements may appear throughout this report, including without limitation,regarding the following sections: Item 1 “Business,” Item 1A “Risk Factors,”Company's future results of operations and Item 7 “Management’s Discussionfinancial position, its business strategy and Analysis of Financial Conditionplans, and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements generally can be identified byits objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” “projects,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,”"believe," "may," "will," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "expect," and similar expressions.expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company has based these forward-looking statements largely on its current expectations and projections about future events and trends that it believes may affect its financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives, and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectationssubject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, that are subjectincluding those described in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Moreover, the Company operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for management to predict all risks, and uncertainties,nor can they assess the impact of all factors on the Company's business or the extent to which couldany factor, or combination of factors, may cause our actual results to differ materially from those reflectedcontained in any forward-looking statements the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, thoseCompany may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the future events and trends discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in particular, the risks discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and those discussed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).forward-looking statements.

 

Important factors that in our view could cause material adverse effects on our financial condition and results of operations include, but are not limited to:Item 1. Business.

 

our ability to consummate the proposed Arrangement (as defined below) with Metamaterial Inc., as discussed herein;

Business Overview

risks that the conditions to the closing of the Arrangement are not satisfied, including the risk that required approvals for the Arrangement from governmental authorities or our stockholders or the Meta shareholders are not obtained;

risks related to litigation relating to the Arrangement;

Meta Materials Inc. (the “Company” or “META” or “Resulting Issuer”) is a developer of high-performance functional materials and nanocomposites.

unexpected costs, charges or expenses resulting from the Arrangement;

risks that the proposed Arrangement disrupts our current plans and operations;

The Company’s registered office is located at 85 Swanson Road, Boxborough, Massachusetts 01719, and its principal executive office is located at 1 Research Drive, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

our ability to realize anticipated benefits from the Arrangement;

our ability to successfully grow following the closing of the Arrangement;

The Company has generated a portfolio of intellectual property and is now moving toward commercializing products at a performance and price point combination that has the potential to be disruptive in multiple market verticals. The Company’s platform technology includes holography, lithography, and medical wireless sensing. The underlying approach that powers the Company’s platform technologies comprises advanced materials, metamaterials and functional surfaces. These materials include structures that are patterned in ways that manipulate light, heat, and electromagnetic waves in unusual ways. The Company’s advanced structural design technologies and scalable manufacturing methods provide a path to broad commercial opportunities in aerospace and defense, automotive, energy, healthcare, consumer electronics, and data transmission.

potential adverse reactions or changes to business relationships resulting from the completion of the Arrangement;

Controlling light, heat, electricity, and radio waves have played key roles in technological advancements throughout history. Advances in electrical and electromagnetic technologies, wireless communications, lasers, and computers have all been made possible by challenging the understanding of how light and other types of energy naturally behave, and how it is possible to manipulate them.

the availability and terms of the financing to be incurred in connection with the Arrangement;

Over the past 20 years, techniques for producing nanostructures have matured, resulting in a wide range of groundbreaking solutions that can control light, heat, and electromagnetic waves at very small scales. Some of the areas of advancement that have contributed to these techniques are photonic crystals, nanolithography, plasmonic phenomena and nanoparticle manipulation. From these advances, a new branch of material science has emerged – metamaterials. Metamaterials are composite structures, consisting of conventional materials such as metals and plastics, which are engineered by scientists to exhibit new or enhanced properties relating to reflection, refraction, diffraction, filtering, conductance and other properties that have the potential for multiple commercial applications.

the success of Meta’s business on a going forward basis following the Arrangement;

A metamaterial typically consists of a multitude of structured unit nano-cells that are comprised of multiple individual elements. These are referred to as meta-atoms. The individual elements are usually arranged in periodic patterns that, together, can manipulate light, heat, or electromagnetic waves. Development strategies for metamaterials and functional surfaces focus on structures that produce unusual and exotic electromagnetic properties by manipulating light and other forms of energy in ways that have never been naturally possible. They gain their properties not as much from their composition as from their exactingly designed structures. The precise shape, geometry, size, orientation, and arrangement of these nanostructures affect the light and other electromagnetic waves to create material properties that are not easily achievable with conventional materials.

legislative, regulatory and economic developments, including changing business conditions in the industries in which we operate and the economy in general as well as financial performance and expectations of our existing and prospective customers, our future operating or financial results;

The Company has many product concepts currently in various stages of development with multiple potential customers in diverse market verticals. The Company’s business model is to co-develop innovative products or applications with industry leaders that add value. This approach enables the Company to understand market dynamics and ensure the relevance and need for its products.

our financial condition and liquidity, including our ability to pay amounts that we owe, obtain additional financing in the future to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate activities;

3

our ability to continue as a going concern;

 

the speculative nature of oil and gas exploration;

the volatile price and demand of oil and natural gaswhich demand could be materially affected by the economic impacts of COVID-19 and possible increases in supply from Russia and OPEC;

Holography Technology

the risk of incurring liability or damages as we conduct business operations due to the inherent dangers involved in oil and gas operations;

risks associated with the company’s ability to obtain additional capital in the future to fund planned expansion; and

Holography is a technique where collimated visible wavelength lasers are used to directly write an interference pattern inside the volume of light-sensitive material (photopolymer) in order to produce highly transparent optical filters and holographic optical elements. For some product lines that require large surface areas, this is combined with a proprietary scanning technique, where the lasers, optically or mechanically, directly write nano-patterns to cover large surface areas with nanometer accuracy.

other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.

META’s principal products that employ holography technology are its metaAIR® laser glare protection eyewear, metaAIR® laser glare protection films for law enforcement and holoOPTIXTM notch filters. META co-developed its metaAIR® laser glare protection eyewear product with Airbus S.A.S. It has been engineered to provide laser glare protection for pilots, military and law enforcement using META’s holography technology. metaAIR® is a holographic optical filter developed using nano-patterned designs that block and deflect specific colors or wavelengths of light. META launched metaAIR® with strategic and exclusive distribution partner, Satair, a wholly owned Airbus company and started producing and selling metaAIR® in April 2019. The scale-up and specification for the raw photopolymer material used to produce the eyewear was successfully finalized in late 2019 and commercialized in 2020. META launched its laser glare protection films for law enforcement use in late 2020. These films are designed to be applied to face shields and helmet visors providing the wearer with the same type of laser glare eye protection afforded to pilots by metaAIR® glasses while preserving peripheral vision critical to law enforcement duties. HoloOPTIXTM notch filters are optical filters that selectively reject a portion of the spectrum, while transmitting all other wavelengths. They are used in applications where it is necessary to block light from a laser, as in machine vision applications and in confocal or multi-photon microscopy, laser-based fluorescence instrumentation, or other life science applications. HoloOPTIXTM notch filters were commercially launched by the Company in November 2020.

META has additional products in development that utilize its proprietary holography technology. Included in the holoOPTIX TM family of products are holographic optical elements (“HOEs”). HOEs are a core component in the display of augmented reality smart glasses products, as well as (in their larger version) in Heads-Up Displays (“HUDs”), in automobiles and aircraft.

Lithography Technology

Lithography is a process commonly used in the fabrication of integrated circuits, in which a light-sensitive polymer (photoresist), is exposed and developed to form 3D relief images on the substrate, typically a silicon wafer of up to 300mm (11.8 inches) in diameter. In order to meet the performance, fabrication-speed, and/or cost criteria required for many potential applications that require large area and low cost nanopatterning, the Company has developed a new nanolithography method called “Rolling Mask” lithography (registered trademark RML®), which combines the best features of photolithography, soft lithography and roll-to-plate/roll-to-roll printing capability technologies. Rolling Mask Lithography utilizes a proprietary UV light exposure method where a master pattern is provided in the form of a cylindrical mask. These master patterns are designed by the Company and over the years they have become part of a growing library of patterns, enriching the intellectual property (“IP”) of the Company. The nanostructured pattern on the mask is then rolled over a flat surface area writing a nano-pattern into the volume of a photoresist, creating patterned grooves, metal is then evaporated and fills the patterned grooves. The excess metal is then removed by a known post-process called lift-off. The result is an invisible conductive metal mesh-patterned surface (registered trademark NANOWEB®) that can be fabricated onto any glass or plastic transparent surface in order to offer high transparency, high conductivity and low haze smart materials.

The Company’s current principal prototype product in lithography technology is its transparent conductive film, NANOWEB®. The lithography division operates out of the Company’s wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, Metamaterial Technologies USA Inc. ("MTI US"). MTI US can produce meter-long samples of NANOWEB®, at a small volumes scale, for industry customers/partners. Throughout 2020 and 2021, the Company has been ordering and upgrading its equipment at its California facility to efficiently supply NANOWEB® samples in larger volumes. The Company has recently installed its first roll-to-roll, NANOWEB® pilot scale production line at its Pleasanton, California facility. The line is configured for 300mm-wide rolls of substrate. All the equipment passed factory acceptance tests prior to delivery and installation, and the line is currently being optimized.

4


There are six NANOWEB®-enabled products and applications that are currently in early stages of development including:

NANOWEB® for Transparent EMI Shielding
NANOWEB® for Transparent Antennas
NANOWEB® for 5G signal enhancement
NANOWEB® for Touch Screen Sensors
NANOWEB® for Solar cells
NANOWEB® for Transparent Heating to de-ice and de-fog

More details of these products and applications can be found in META’s EDGAR filings and on META’s website at www.metamaterial.com.

The Company has entered into a collaboration agreement with Crossover Solutions Inc. to commercialize the NANOWEB® enabled products and applications for the automotive industry and with ADI Technologies to help secure contracts with the US Department of Defense.

Nano-optic structures and color-shifting foils - the Company recently acquired Nanotech Security Corp. "Nanotech" which specializes in designing, originating, recombining, and mass-producing nanotechnology-based films with application for a wide variety of products and markets. Nanotech develops and produces nano-optic structures and color-shifting foils used in authentication and brand protection applications across a wide range of markets including banknotes, secure government documents, and commercial branding. The Company’s nano-optic security technology platforms include:

KolourOptik®, a patented visual technology that is exclusive to the government and banknote market and combines sub-wavelength nanostructures and microstructures to create modern overt security features with a unique and customizable optical effect. KolourOptik® pure plasmonic color pixels produce full color, 3D depth, and movement used in security stripes and threads that are nearly impossible to replicate.
LiveOptik™, a patented visual technology that utilizes innovative nano-optics one tenth the size of traditional holographic structures to create next generation overt security features customized to Nanotech’s customers’ unique requirements. LiveOptik delivers multi-color, 3D depth, movement and image switches for secure brand protection stripes, threads and labels that are nearly impossible to replicate.
LumaChrome™ optical thin film security features are manufactured using precision engineered nanometer thick layers of metals and ceramics to form filters designed to uniquely manipulate visible and non-visible light. This unique manipulation of light properties is used to create specialized security features in the form of threads, stripes, and patches that are applied to banknotes and other secure documents. By using sophisticated electron beam and sputtered deposition methods, Nanotech precisely controls the construction and inherent properties to provide custom color-shifting solutions. An individual looking at these threads, stripes and patches sees an obvious color shift (e.g. green to magenta) when the document or bank note is tilted or rotated

 

 

We undertake no obligation5


Wireless Sensing and Radio Wave Imaging Technology

META’s Wireless Sensing platform uses infrared and radio frequency (RF) transmitters and receivers to revise or publicly releasecollect and measure a variety of biological information enabling non-invasive and safe medical diagnostics. The platform requires the resultsability to cancel reflections (anti-reflection) from the skin to reduce the natural impedance the skin provides to such signals and increase the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (“SNR”) of any revisioncertain diagnostic instruments used in conjunction with the platform. This reflection-cancelling requirement is satisfied using META’s proprietary metamaterial films that employ patterned designs, printed on metal-dielectric structures on flexible substrates that act as anti-reflection (impedance-matching) coatings when placed over the human skin in combination with medical diagnostic modalities, such as MRI, ultrasound systems, non-invasive glucometers etc. The Company is developing a number of medical products that employ this proprietary technology. glucoWISETM, is in development as a completely non-invasive glucose measurement device. It is being developed first as a benchtop medical device product, followed by a portable, pocket-size product and ultimately as a wearable. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), increasing the SNR by orders of magnitude has been demonstrated to any forward-looking statements, exceptproduce much higher resolution images with significant increases in imaging speed resulting in better patient throughput and potentially more accurate diagnoses in imaging clinics. For example, the Company is developing metaSURFACE™ (also known as required by law. Given these risksradiWISE™) an innovation which allows an improvement in signal to noise ratio of up to 40 times for MRI scans. The metaSURFACE™ device consists of proprietary non-ferrous metallic and uncertainties, readersdielectric layers that are cautioned notexactingly designed to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.interact (resonate) with radio waves increasing the SNR.META is also researching the use of its Radio Wave Imaging technology in breast cancer and stroke diagnosis.

The Company is developing wireless sensing and radio wave imaging applications from its London, UK office and its newly established Athens, Greece office.

Oil and Gas operations

 

As used herein,part of the “Company,” “Torchlight,” “we,” “our,” and similar terms includeArrangement Agreement with Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Page
Item 1.Business5
Item 1A.Risk Factors11
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments25
Item 2.Properties25
Item 3.Legal Proceedings32
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures32
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities33
Item 6.Selected Financial Data33
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations34
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk38
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data39
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure70
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures70
Item 9B.Other Information71
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officer, and Corporate Governance72
Item 11.Executive Compensation74
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters76
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence77
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services78
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules79
Signatures82

4

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Business Overview

We are an energy company engaged("Torchlight") as mentioned in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation and/or developmentfollowing section, the Company acquired a group of oil and natural gas propertiesassets ("O&G assets") and had interest in the United States. We are primarily focused on the acquisition of early-stage projects, the development and delineation of these projects, and then the monetization of those assets once these activities are completed.them as follows:

Since 2010, our primary focus has been the development of interests in oil and gas projects we hold in the Permian Basin in West Texas. Presently, our primary interests include

the Orogrande Project in Hudspeth County, Texas and
the Hazel Project in Sterling, Tom Green, and Irion Counties, Texas
the Midland Basin. In November 2020, we sold our interestHunton wells in the projectpartnership with Kodiak in Winkler County, Texas.

Central Oklahoma

We employ a private equity model within a public platform, with the goal to (i) enter into a play at favorable valuations, (ii) “prove up” and delineate the play through committed capital and exhaustive geologic and engineering review, and (iii) monetize our position through an exit to public and private independents that can continue full-scale development. Rich Masterson, our consulting geologist, has originated several of our current plays, as discussed below, based on his tenure as a geologist since 1974. He is credited with originating the Wolfbone shale play in the Southern Delaware Basin of West Texas and has prepared prospects totaling over 150,000 acres that have been leased, drilled and are currently being developed by Devon Energy Corp., Occidental Petroleum Corporation, Noble Energy, and Samson Oil & Gas Ltd., among others.

In April 2018, we announced that we have commenced a process that could result in the monetization of the Hazel Project. Pursuant to our corporate strategy, in our opinion the development activity at the Hazel Project, coupled with nearby activities of other oil and gas operators, is indicative of this project having achieved a level of value that suggests monetization. We believe that the liquidity that would be provided from selling the Hazel Project could be redeployed into the Orogrande Project. In August 2020, our subsidiaries entered into an option agreement with a third party (which was amended in September 2020), under which, in exchange for satisfying certain drilling obligations, the third party will have the option to purchase the entire Hazel Project by a date no later than May 31, 2021. In January 2021, the third party notified us of its intent to exercise its option to perform operations sufficient to satisfy the remaining drilling obligations. The option to purchase the Hazel Project may never be exercised.

We are also currently marketing the Orogrande Project for an outright sale or farm in partner. These efforts are continuing.

We operate our business through our wholly owned subsidiaries, including Torchlight Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (“TEI”), Hudspeth Oil Corporation, a Texas corporation, (“Hudspeth”), and Torchlight Hazel, LLC, a Texas limited liability company. We are in the process of winding up our subsidiaries Warwink Properties, LLC and Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC. We currently have four full-time employees and we employ consultants for various roles as needed.

Our principal executive offices are located at 5700 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 3600, Plano, Texas 75093. The telephone number of our principal executive offices is (214) 432-8002. 

Arrangement Agreement with Meta

On December 14, 2020, we and our newly formed subsidiaries, Metamaterial Exchangeco Inc. (“Canco”) and 2798831 Ontario Inc. (“Callco”), both Ontario corporations, entered into an arrangement agreement (the “Arrangement Agreement”) with Metamaterial Inc., an Ontario corporation headquartered in Nova Scotia, Canada (“Meta”). Under the Arrangement Agreement, Canco is to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Meta by way of a statutory plan of arrangement under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), or the Arrangement, on and subject to the terms and conditions of the Arrangement Agreement. On February 3, 2021, and on March 11, 2020, we and our Ontario subsidiaries entered into an amendment to the Arrangement Agreement with Meta. All references to the Arrangement Agreement in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to the Arrangement Agreement as amended.

The Arrangement Agreement provides that the Meta shareholders may elect to receive either shares of our common stock or shares of the capital stock of Canco, which are referred toCompany has classified these assets as the Exchangeable Shares, in exchangeassets held for such holder’s Meta common shares, in each case based on an exchange ratio (the “Exchange Ratio”) to be determined based on the number of Meta common shares and shares of our common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Arrangement (the “Effective Time”). After the Effective Time, each Exchangeable Share will be exchangeable by the holder for one share of the common stock of the combined company (subject to customary adjustments for stock splits or other reorganizations). In addition, we may require all outstanding Exchangeable Shares to be exchanged upon the occurrence of certain events and at any time following the seventh anniversary of the closing of the Arrangement. While outstanding, holders of Exchangeable Shares will be entitled to cast votes on matters for which holders of the common stock of the combined company are entitled to vote, and will be entitled to receive dividends economically equivalent to the dividends declared by the combined company with respectsale pursuant to its common stock. Eligibilitycommitment to receive Exchangeable Shares will be subject to certain Canadian residency restrictions and tax statuses.

5

ITEM 1. BUSINESS - continued

The Arrangement Agreement additionally makes provision forsell or spin out the conversion or amendment of other outstanding Meta securities, including options, deferred share units and warrants, such that they will be exercisable for shares of the common stock of the combined company, in each case with adjustments based on the Exchange Ratio.

Immediately following the Effective Time, based on the Exchange Ratio, the former shareholders of Meta are anticipated to own approximately 75% of the economic and voting interest of the combined company, with current Torchlight stockholders holding approximately 25% economic and voting interest. Following the Effective Time, the combined company’s board of directors will be comprised of seven directors, with five of such directors to be nominees of Meta, one to be jointly nominated by Meta and Torchlight and one director to be a nominee of Torchlight, subject to the reasonable approval of Meta. Additionally, the current management of Torchlight will resign and be replaced by George Palikaras as Chief Executive Officer and Kenneth Rice as Chief Financial Officer.

Under the Arrangement Agreement, Torchlight will also submit to its stockholders a proposal to approve the issuance of stock under the Arrangement Agreement and amend Torchlight’s articles of incorporation to effect a reverse split (the “Reverse Split”), to maintain compliance with the listing standards of Nasdaq. In connection therewith, on February 4, 2021, we filed a preliminary proxy statement (the “Proxy”), with the SEC.

Following the Reverse Split, and prior to the Effective Time, Torchlight will declare and issue a dividend, on a pro rata basis, of shares of Series A preferred stock, (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), with the rights set forth in the Series A certificate of designation, (the “Series A Certificate of Designation”) which is attached as Annex H of the Proxy, to the holders of its common stock. Following the Effective Time, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to a dividend based on the net proceeds of the sale of anyO&G assets that are used or held for use in our oil and gas exploration business, (the “O&G Assets”), subject to certain holdbacks. Such asset sales must occur prior to the earlier of (i) December 31, 2021 or (ii) the date which is six months from the closing of the Arrangement, or (iii) such later date as may be agreed between the Company and the individual appointed to serve as the representative of the holders of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Sale Expiration Date”). Following the Sale Expiration Date, subject to certain conditions, the combined company will effect a spin-off of any remaining O&G Assets with theThe Series A Preferred Stock holders to receive their pro rata equity interest inwill automatically be cancelled once the spin-off entity.

The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of Meta, and shareholders representing 48.06% of Meta’s common shares have entered into voting and support agreements in connection with the Arrangement. The transaction has also been unanimously approved by our board of directors, and stockholders representing 19.74% of our common stock have entered into voting and support agreements in connection with the Arrangement.

The consummation of the Arrangement is subject to certain closing conditions, including without limitation the requirement that (i) prior to the effective time of the Arrangement, we raise gross proceeds of at least $10 million through the issuance of common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, less the aggregate principal amount and accrued interest on certain loans that we have made to Meta (the “Pre-Closing Financing”) which condition has been met (ii) all of our debt is converted into shares of our common stock or repaid in full, with certain exceptions available and (iii) the shares issuable in connection with the arrangemententitled dividends have been approved for listing on Nasdaq. Other closing conditions include without limitation the receipt of all required approvals from our stockholders and Meta’s shareholders and from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List), (the “Court”) and all other required regulatory approvals, as well as other customary closing conditions, including the absence of a material adverse effect with respect to either us or Meta. As of the date of this filing all of our notes payable have been retired.

The Arrangement is expected to close in the first half of 2021 and is to be implemented by way of an arrangement under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario). The Arrangement Agreement provides for customary representations, warranties and covenants, including covenants of each party to (i) subject to certain exceptions, carry on its business in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice during the period between the execution of the Arrangement Agreement and the Effective Time and (ii) not solicit any alternate transactions or, subject to certain exceptions, to engage in any discussions or negotiations with respect thereto. Subject to certain terms and conditions, the Arrangement Agreement may be terminated by either party after May 15, 2021, and if the Arrangement Agreement is terminated prior to that date by either party as a result of obtaining a superior proposal from a third party, such terminating party is required to pay a termination fee of $2 million.

Under the Arrangement Agreement, we loaned Meta $500,000 on December 16, 2020, in exchange for an unsecured convertible promissory note in substantially the same form as the 8% unsecured convertible promissory note that evidences our loan to Meta of $500,000 on September 20, 2020. On February 18, 2021, Torchlight loaned to Meta $10,000,000, evidenced by an unsecured convertible promissory note issued by Meta (the “Promissory Note”), substantially in the same form as the previous bridge notes issued by Meta to us, to satisfy Torchlight’s requirement to provide additional bridge financing to Meta pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement. These three bridge loans, including the aggregate principal and unpaid interest, will be included in, and credited against, the funds we are obligated to raise in the Pre-Closing Financing. Upon the closing of the Arrangement, all of the bridge notes will be deemed cancelled and paid in full.

6

ITEM 1. BUSINESS - continued

Key Torchlight Business Attributes

Experienced People. We build on the expertise and experiences of our management team, including John Brda and Roger Wurtele. We will also receive guidance from outside advisors as well as our Board of Directors and will align with high quality exploration and technical partners.

Project Focus. We are focusing primarily on exploitation projects by pursuing resources in areas where commercial production has already been established but where opportunity for additional and nearby development is indicated. We may pursue high risk exploration prospects which may appear less favored than low risk exploration. We will, however, consider these high risk-high reward exploration prospects in connection with exploitation opportunities in a project that would reduce the overall project economic risk. We will consider such high risk-high reward prospects on their individual merits.

Lower Cost Structure. We will attempt to maintain the lowest possible cost structure, enabling the greatest margins and providing opportunities for investment that would not be feasible for higher cost competitors.

Limit Capital Risks. Limited capital exposure is planned initially to add value to a project and determine its economic viability. Projects are staged and have options before additional capital is invested. We will limit our exposure in any one project by participating at reduced working interest levels, thereby being able to diversify with limited capital. Management has experience in successfully managing risks of projects, finance, and value.

7

ITEM 1. BUSINESS - continued

Business Processes

We believe there are three principal business processes that we must follow to enable our operations to be profitable. Each major business process offers the opportunity for a distinct partner or alliance as we grow. These processes are:

Investment Evaluation and Review;

Operations and Field Activities; and

Administrative and Finance Management.

Investment Evaluation and Review. This process is the key ingredient to our success. Recognition of quality investment opportunities is the fuel that drives our engine. Broadly, this process includes the following activities: prospect acquisition, regional and local geological and geophysical evaluations, data processing, economic analysis, lease acquisition and negotiations, permitting, and field supervision. We expect these evaluation processes to be managed by our management team. Expert or specific technical support will be outsourced as needed. Only if a project is taken to development, and only then, will additional staff be hired. New personnel will have very specific responsibilities. We anticipate attractive investment opportunities to be presented from outside companies and from the large informal community of geoscientists and engineers. Building a network of advisors is key to the pipeline of high-quality opportunities.

Operations and Field Activities. This process begins following management approval of an investment. Well site supervision, construction, drilling, logging, product marketing, and transportation are examples of some activities. We will prefer to be the operator, but when operations are not possible, we will farm-out sufficient interests to third parties that will be responsible for these operating activities. We provide personnel to monitor these activities and associated costs.

Administrative and Finance Management. This process coordinates our initial structuring and capitalization, general operations and accounting, reporting, audit, banking and cash management, regulatory agencies reporting and interaction, timely and accurate payment of royalties, taxes, leases rentals, vendor accounts and performance management that includes budgeting and maintenance of financial controls, and interface with legal counsel and tax and other financial and business advisors.

Current Projects

As of December 31, 2020, we had interests in three oil and gas projects: the Orogrande Project in Hudspeth County, Texas, the Hazel Project in Sterling, Tom Green, and Irion Counties, Texas, and the Hunton wells in partnership with Kodiak in Central Oklahoma

paid. See the description under “Current Projects” below underin Note 4, “Oil & Gas Properties,”5, “Assets Held for Sale” of the financial statements included with this report for information and disclosure regarding these projects, which description is incorporated herein by reference.assets. See Item 1A, risk Factors for more information on these assets.

8

ITEM 1. BUSINESS - continuedCustomers

The Company’s customers are OEM providers in multiple industries including aerospace, automotive, consumer electronics, communications, energy, banknote and brand security, and medical devices. The Company organizes its development and support efforts around these differentiated vertical markets to enable it to effectively penetrate these markets and to develop products specific to the needs of these OEM customers.

Marketing and Sales

The Company operates under a Business-to-Business model. Its marketing and sales functions are organized to support and grow this operating model. The Company utilizes a combination of filed-based and in-house selling resources to promote and sell its more common off-the-shelf products and a vertical market focused Business Development group to develop and support long-term customer relationships in the vertical market of interest. The Company's marketing efforts are focused on technical education of its customer base regarding its products, support of a meaningful presence at trade shows and industry events and routine production of collateral materials to support its sales and business development efforts.

 

Industry6


Manufacturing

The Company employs a hybrid model for manufacturing of our high-performance functional materials and Business Environmentnanocomposites.

The Company provides research scale production of its products in-house to its customers in its lithography and holography business areas. The Company is scaling up pilot scale production of its materials in its Pleasanton facility and Highfield Park facility. The Company has current capacity in its Thurso facility to produce its banknote security and brand security product at commercial scale and it is expanding this capacity. In certain instances where volume warrants, the Company will make available on a license basis, its equipment and proprietary processes to its customers or to third party contractors to product its products for their needs.

The Company is constantly improving and investing in its manufacturing capabilities and the associated quality control and resource planning infrastructure. The Company holds ISO9001 certification for its Highfield Park facility and it is pursuing additional certifications in its Thurso facility.

Research And Development

The Company operates in a rapidly evolving industry subject to significant technological change and new product introductions and enhancements. The Company believes that its continued commitment to research and development is a critical element of ability to introduce new and enhanced products and technologies. The Company has historically invested more than forty percent (40%) of its operating expenses in its research and development efforts and these activities are integral to maintaining and enhancing our competitive position. The Company also increasingly seeks to deploy its resources to solve fundamental challenges that are both common to, and provide competitive advantage across, its high-performance functional materials and nanocomposites.

The Company believes that its success depends in part on its ability to achieve the following in a cost-effective and timely manner:

enable its OEM customers to integrate its functional films into their products;
develop new technologies that meet the changing needs of the vertical markets it has chosen to pursue;
improve its existing technologies to enable growth into new application areas; and expand its intellectual property portfolio

Intellectual Property

During 2021, the Company has expanded its patents and trademarks portfolio significantly in a wide range of applications including holography, lithography, wireless sensing technology and nano-optic structures. In addition to META's previous portfolio of 126 patents, the Company acquired more than 23 patents from Interglass Technology AG and 98 patents from the Nanotech acquisition The Company believes that its combination of patents and additional IP that is being held confidential by way of multiple trade secrets provides the Company with an important competitive advantage, marketing benefits, and licensing revenue opportunities.

 

We are experiencing a time of fluctuating oil prices caused by lower demand, higher US Supply, and OPEC’s policies on production. Unfortunately, this is the cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry. We experience highs and lows that seem to come in cycles. Fortunately, advances in technology drive the US market and we feel this will drive the development costs down on our exploration and drilling programs.

7


CompetitionRegulation

 

The oilCompany is subject to significant regulation by local, state, federal and natural gas industryinternational laws in all jurisdictions in which it operates. Compliance with these requirements can be costly and time consuming. The Company believes that its operations, products, services, and actions substantially comply with applicable regulations in all jurisdictions. However, the risk of non-compliance cannot be eliminated and therefore there is intensely competitive,no assurance that future costs related to these regulations will not be incurred. There is also the possibility that regulations will be retroactively applied, interpreted, or applied differently to the Company's operations, products, services, and weactions which will compete with numerous other companies engaged in the explorationrequire significant time and production of oil and gas. Some of these companies have substantially greater resources than we have. Not only do they explore for and produce oil and natural gas, but also many carry on midstream and refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national, or worldwide basis. The operations of other companies may be able to pay more for exploratory prospects and productive oil and natural gas properties. They may also have more resources to define, evaluate, bid for, and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or human resources permit.resources.

 

Our larger or integrated competitors may have the resources to be better able to absorb the burden of current and future federal, state, and local laws and regulations more easily than we can, which would adversely affect our competitive position. Our ability to locate reserves and acquire interests in properties in the future will be dependent upon our ability and resources to evaluate and select suitable properties and consummate transactions in this highly competitive environment. In addition, we may be at a disadvantage in producing oil and natural gas properties and bidding for exploratory prospects because we have fewer financial and human resources than other companies in our industry. Should a larger and better financed company decide to directly compete with us, and be successful in its efforts, our business could be adversely affected.Human Capital Resources

 

MarketingAs of February 28, 2022, the Company had 130 employees. Approximately 90% of its employees are located in Canada and Customersthe United States. Of the total workforce, 48 employees are involved in research and development; 28 employees are involved in operations, manufacturing, service and quality assurance; and 54 employees are involved in sales and marketing, finance, information technology, general management and other administrative functions.

Available Information

The market for oil and natural gas that we will produce depends on factors beyond our control, including the extent of domestic production and imports of oil and natural gas, the proximity and capacity of natural gas pipelines and other transportation facilities, demand for oil and natural gas, the marketing of competitive fuels, and the effects of state and federal regulation. The oil and gas industry also competes with other industries in supplying the energy and fuel requirements of industrial, commercial, and individual consumers.

Our oil production is expected to be sold at prices tied to the spot oil markets. Our natural gas production is expected to be sold under short-term contracts and priced based on first of the month index prices or on daily spot market prices. We will rely on our operating partners to market and sell our production.

Governmental Regulation and Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to various rules, regulations, and limitations impacting the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry as a whole.

Regulation of Oil and Natural Gas Production

Our oil and natural gas exploration, production, and related operations, when developed, will be subject to extensive rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state, tribal, and local authorities and agencies. Certain states may also have statutes or regulations addressing conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and natural gas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from wells, and the regulation of spacing, plugging, and abandonment of such wells. Failure to comply with any such rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. The regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry will most likely increase our cost of doing business and may affect our profitability. Although we believe we are currently in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, because such rules and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted, we are unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying with such laws. Significant expenditures may be required to comply with governmental laws and regulations and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Environmental Matters

Our operations and properties are and will be subject to extensive and changing federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation, and discharge of materials into the environment, and relating to safety and health. In the future, environmental legislation and regulation may trend toward stricter standards. These laws and regulations may:

require the acquisition of a permit or other authorization before construction or drilling commences and for certain other activities;

limit or prohibit construction, drilling, and other activities on certain lands lying within wilderness and other protected areas;

impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from operations; or

restrict certain areas from fracking and other stimulation techniques.

9

ITEM 1. BUSINESS - continued

The permits required for our operations may be subject to revocation, modification, and renewal by issuing authorities. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce their regulations, and violations are subject to fines or injunctions, or both. In the opinion of management, we are and will be in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations and have no material commitments for capital expenditures to comply with existing environmental requirements. Nevertheless, changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or in interpretations thereof could have a significant impact on our company, as well as the oil and natural gas industry in general.

The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and comparable state statutes impose strict, joint, and several liability on owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of “hazardous substances” found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state statutes govern the disposal of “solid waste” and “hazardous waste” and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance. Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of “hazardous substance,” state laws affecting our operations may impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum related products. In addition, although RCRA classifies certain oil field wastes as “non-hazardous,” such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous wastes thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent handling and disposal requirements.

The Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) seeks to ensure that activities do not jeopardize endangered or threatened animal, fish, and plant species, nor destroy or modify the critical habitat of such species. Under ESA, exploration and production operations, as well as actions by federal agencies, may not significantly impair or jeopardize the species or its habitat. ESA provides for criminal penalties for willful violations of the Act. Other statutes that provide protection to animal and plant species and that may apply to our operations include, but are not necessarily limited to, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the National Historic Preservation Act. Although we believe that our operations will be in substantial compliance with such statutes, any change in these statutes or any reclassification of a species as endangered could subject our company to significant expenses to modify our operations or could force our company to discontinue certain operations altogether.

Hydraulic fracturing is regulated by state and federal oil and gas regulatory authorities, including specifically the requirement to disclose certain information related to hydraulic fracturing operations. Operators must follow applicable legal requirements for groundwater protection in our operations that are subject to supervision by state and federal regulators (including the Bureau of Land Management on federal acreage). Furthermore, well construction practices require the installation of multiple layers of protective steel casing surrounded by cement that are specifically designed and installed to protect freshwater aquifers by preventing the migration of fracturing fluids into aquifers. Regulatory proposals in some states and local communities have been initiated to require or make more stringent the permitting and compliance requirements for hydraulic fracturing operations. Federal and state agencies have continued to assess the impacts of hydraulic fracturing, which could spur further action toward federal and/or state legislation and regulation of hydraulic fracturing activities. In addition, in light of concerns about seismic activity being triggered by the injection of produced waters into underground wells and hydraulic fracturing, certain regulators are also considering additional requirements related to seismic safety for hydraulic fracturing activities. Further restrictions on hydraulic fracturing could make it prohibitive to conduct our operations, and also reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we or our operators are ultimately able to produce in commercial quantities from our properties.

Climate Change

Significant studies and research have been devoted to climate change and global warming, and climate change has developed into a major political issue in the United States and globally. Certain research suggests that greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change and pose a threat to the environment. Recent scientific research and political debate has focused in part on carbon dioxide and methane incidental to oil and natural gas exploration and production. Many states and the federal government have enacted legislation directed at controlling greenhouse gas emissions, and future legislation and regulation could impose additional restrictions or requirements in connection with our drilling and production activities and favor use of alternative energy sources, which could affect operating costs and demand for oil products. As such, our business could be materially adversely affected by domestic and international legislation targeted at controlling climate change.

Employees

We currently have four full time employees and no part time employees. We employ consultants and contract help as needed. We anticipate, as needed, we will add additional employees, and we will continue using independent contractors, consultants, attorneys, and accountants as necessary to complement services rendered by our employees. We presently have independent technical professionals under consulting agreements who are available to us on an as needed basis.

Research and Development

We did not spend any funds on research and development activities during the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019.

Available Information

OurCompany's Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports are accessible free of charge on ourits website at www.torchlightenergy.comwww.metamaterial.com as soon as reasonably practicable after wehe Company electronically filefiles such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding ourthe Company's filings at www.sec.gov.

10

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS The reference to the Company's website does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained at the site.

 

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before investing in our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Some of these factors relate to the Arrangement as well as to the risks associated with Meta’s business and the industry in which Meta operates and our business and the industry in which we operate. The risks and uncertainties described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business and operations.Business Combinations

 

Risks Related to the COVID-19 PandemicTorchlight RTO

 

An occurrenceOn December 14, 2020, the Company (formerly known as “Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.” or “Torchlight”) and its subsidiaries, Metamaterial Exchangeco Inc. (formerly named 2798832 Ontario Inc., “Canco”) and 2798831 Ontario Inc. (“Callco”), entered into an Arrangement Agreement (the “Arrangement Agreement”) with Metamaterial Inc. ("MMI"), an Ontario corporation headquartered in Nova Scotia, Canada, to acquire all of an uncontrollable event suchthe outstanding common stock of MMI by way of a statutory plan of arrangement (the “Arrangement”) under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), on and subject to the terms and conditions of the Arrangement Agreement (the “Torchlight RTO”). On June 25, 2021, the Company implemented a reverse stock split, changed its name from “Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.” to “Meta Materials Inc.” and changed its trading symbol from “TRCH” to “MMAT”. On June 28, 2021, following the satisfaction of the closing conditions set forth in the Arrangement Agreement, the Arrangement was completed.

On June 28, 2021, and pursuant to the completion of the Arrangement Agreement, the Company began trading on the NASDAQ under the symbol “MMAT” while MMI common stock was delisted from the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”). At the same time, Metamaterial Exchangeco Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of META, started trading under the symbol “MMAX” on the CSE. Certain previous shareholders of MMI elected to convert their common stock of MMI into exchangeable shares in Metamaterial Exchangeco Inc. These exchangeable shares, which can be converted into common stock of META at the option of the holder, are similar in substance to common shares of META and have been included in the determination of outstanding common shares of META.

For accounting purposes MMI, the legal subsidiary, has been treated as the COVID-19 pandemicaccounting acquirer and the Company, the legal parent, has been treated as the accounting acquiree. The transaction has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with ASC 805 Business Combination. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements are a continuation of MMI consolidated financial statements prior to June 28, 2021 and exclude the balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive loss, statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and statements of cash flows of Torchlight prior to June 28, 2021. See note 3 for additional information.

8


Nanotech acquisition

On August 5, 2021, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement to indirectly acquire Nanotech. On October 5, 2021, a wholly owned subsidiary of META purchased 100% of Nanotech’s common stock at CA$1.25 per share. In addition, the transaction price included the settlement of certain Nanotech share awards outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the agreement, including the repurchase and cancellation of 303,391 Nanotech restricted share units ("RSU") at a purchase price of CA$1.25 per RSU and the settlement of 4,359,000 Nanotech in-the-money stock options at a purchase price equal to CA$1.25 per option, less the exercise price thereof. The consideration payable to securityholders under the arrangement was payable in cash, resulting in a total purchase price of $71.6 million (CA$90.8 million).

Nanotech is likely to negatively affect,incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, Canada. Nanotech’s head office is located at #505 - 3292 Production Way, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 4R4. In addition, Nanotech owns and has to date negatively affected, our operations.operates a manufacturing facility located in Thurso, Quebec.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

The occurrencefollowing factors could materially affect META’s business, financial condition or results of an uncontrollable event such as the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to, and has already, negatively affected our operations. A pandemic typically results in social distancing, travel bans and quarantine, and the effects of, and response to, the COVID-19 pandemic has limited access to our facilities, properties, management, support staff and professional advisors. These, in turn, have not only negatively impacted our operations and financial condition, but our overall abilityshould be carefully considered in evaluating the Company and its business, in addition to react timely to mitigate the impact ofother information presented elsewhere in this event. Further, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in declines in the demand for, and the price of, oil and gas, and it is unclear how long this decline will last. The full effect on our business and operation is currently unknown. In the event that the effects of COVID-19 continue in the future and/or the economy continues to deteriorate, we may be forced to curtail our operations and may be unable to pay our debt obligations, if any, (all notes payable have been paid or converted at the date of this filing) as they come due.report.

 

Risks That Could Affect the Company’s Financial Condition

Limited Operating History

The coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemicCompany has had a negative effectlimited operating history, which can make it difficult for investors to evaluate the Company’s operations and prospects and may increase the risks associated with investment in the Company.

The Company has incurred recurring consolidated net losses since its inception and expects its operating costs to continue to increase in future periods as it expends substantial financial and other resources on, oilamong other things, business and gas prices,headcount expansion in operations, sales and depending onmarketing, research and development, and administration as a public company. These expenditures may not result in additional revenues or the severity and longevitygrowth of the pandemic, it may result in a major economic recession which will continueCompany's business. If the Company fails to depress oil and gas prices and cause ourgrow revenues or to achieve profitability while its operating costs increase, its business, andfinancial condition, results of operations and growth prospects will be materially, adversely affected.

The Company is expected to suffer.be subject to many of the risks common to early-stage enterprises for the foreseeable future, including challenges related to laws, regulations, licensing, integrating and retaining qualified employees; making effective use of limited resources; achieving market acceptance of existing and future products; competing against companies with greater financial and technical resources; acquiring and retaining customers; and developing new solutions; and challenges relating to identified material weaknesses in internal control.

Access to Capital

The Company believes that current working capital will be sufficient to continue its business for at least the next twelve months. Should the Company's costs and expenses prove to be greater than it currently anticipates, or should it change its current business plan in a manner that will increase or accelerate its anticipated costs and expenses, such as through the acquisition of new products, the depletion of its working capital could be accelerated. The Company presently has access to approximately one hundred and twelve million dollars of new funding through its existing At the Market S-3 Shelf Registration (ATM). The Company believes that this funding is sufficient to enable it to fund its current working capital needs well into 2024.

 

The inability and/Company may pursue sources of additional capital through various financing transactions or unwillingnessarrangements, including joint venturing of individualsprojects, debt financing, equity financing, or other means. The Company may not be successful in identifying suitable financing transactions in the time period required or at all, and it may not obtain the capital it requires by other means.

The Company's ability to congregateobtain financing, if and when necessary, may be impaired by such factors as the capital markets and its limited operating history.

9


Any additional capital raised through the sale of equity may dilute the ownership percentage of the Company's stockholders. Raising any such capital could also result in large groups, travel and/or visit retail businesses or travel outsidea decrease in the fair market value of their homes will,its equity securities because its assets would be owned by a larger pool of outstanding equity. The terms of securities the Company issues in future capital transactions may be more favorable to its new investors, and has to date, had a negative effect on the demand for,may include preferences, superior voting rights and the current pricesissuance of oilother derivative securities, and gas. Additionally, the demand for oil and gas is based partially onglobal economic conditions. If the COVID-19 pandemic results in a global economic recession, there will be a continued negative effect on the demand for oil and gas and this willissuances of incentive awards under equity employee incentive plans, which may have a negative effect on our operating results. All of the abovefurther dilutive effect.

The Company may be exacerbatedincur substantial costs in thepursuing future as the COVID-19 outbreakcapital financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees, printing and the governmental responses thereto continue. Concerns about global economic growth have had a significant adverse impact on global financial markets and commodity prices. If the economic climate in the United States or abroad continues to deteriorate, demand for petroleum products could further diminish, which will impact the price at which we can sell our oil and gas, impact the value of our working interestsdistribution expenses and other oil and gas assets, affect the ability of our vendors, suppliers and customerscosts. The Company may also be required to continue operations, affect our operations and ultimatelyrecognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities it may issue, which may adversely impact our results of operations, liquidity and financial conditioncondition.

.Currency Fluctuations

 

Risks RelatedThe Company’s revenues and expenses are denominated in US dollars, Canadian dollars, EURO, and Great British Pounds, and therefore are exposed to significant currency exchange fluctuations. Recent events in the Arrangementglobal financial markets have been coupled with increased volatility in the currency markets. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the US dollar, the Canadian dollar and the Great British Pounds may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and operating results. The Company may, in the future, establish a program to hedge a portion of its foreign currency exposure with the objective of minimizing the impact of adverse foreign currency exchange movements. With appropriate risk management and oversight this may be able to offset future risk, however a hedging strategy will result in additional operating costs.

Costs of Maintaining a Public Listing

 

As a publicly traded company, there are costs associated with legal, accounting, and other expenses related to regulatory compliance. Securities legislation and the rules and policies of the NASDAQ require listed companies to, among other things, adopt corporate governance and related practices, and to continuously prepare and disclose material information, all of which add to a company’s legal and financial compliance costs. The ArrangementCompany may not be completed duealso elect to failure to obtain the necessary court and/or regulatory approvals.devote greater resources than it otherwise would have on communication and other activities typically considered important by publicly traded companies.

 

To completeRisks That Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on the Arrangement, we and Meta must make certain filings with and obtain certain consents and approvals from various governmental and regulatory authorities including the Court, and the approval of Nasdaq of the listing of the shares of the combined company to be issued pursuant to the Arrangement. We and Meta have not yet obtained these approvals, all of which are required to complete the Arrangement. The regulatory approval processes may take a lengthy period of time to complete which could delay completion of the Arrangement. The approval processes, including the undertakings and conditions that may be required for approval or whether the court and regulatory approvals, may not be obtained.Company’s Business

Customer Concentration

 

Uncertainty surroundingThe Company relies on a few customers for a significant portion of its revenues. For the Arrangement could adversely affect our retentionyear ended December 31, 2021, the Company had 3 customers that accounted for $3,307,914 or 81% of strategic partners and personnel and could negatively impact our future business and operations.total revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company had 3 customers that accounted for $807,912 or 72% of total revenue.

 

BecauseThe Company currently derives a significant portion of its revenue from contract services between its wholly-owned subsidiary, Nanotech, and a G10 central bank. The Company is developing a new security feature under a framework contract with this customer. There can be no assurance that this project will be successful, or that will result in long-term production revenue for this security feature.

Risk of not developing new products, applications, and end markets for the ArrangementCompany's products

The Company's future success will depend in part on its ability to generate sales of its products as well as generating development revenue. Current and potential customers may have substantial investment in, and know-how related to the Company's technologies. Customers may be reluctant to change from incumbent suppliers or cease using their own solutions, or the Company's products may miss the design and procurement cycles of its customers. Many target markets have historically been slow to adopt new technologies. These markets often require long testing and qualification periods or lengthy government approval processes before admitting new suppliers or adopting new technologies.

Introduction of new products and product enhancements will require that the Company effectively transfer production processes from research and development to manufacturing and coordinate efforts with those suppliers to achieve increased production volume rapidly. If we are unable to implement this strategy to develop new applications and end markets for products or develop new products, the business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects could be materially adversely affected. In addition, any newly developed or enhanced products may not achieve market acceptance or may be rendered obsolete or less competitive by the introduction of new products by other companies.

10


Research and Market Development

Although the Company, itself and through its investments, is dependent upon satisfactioncommitted to researching and developing new markets and products and improving existing products, there can be no assurances that such research and market development activities will prove profitable or that the resulting markets and/or products, if any, will be commercially viable or successfully produced and marketed. A failure in the demand for products to materialize as a result of certain conditions, its completion is subject to uncertainty. In response to this uncertainty, our strategic partners may delaycompetition, technological change or defer decisions concerning our business. Any delay or deferral of those decisions by strategic partnersother factors could have a material adverse effect on ourthe business, results of operations and operations, regardlessfinancial condition of whether the Arrangement is ultimately completed.companies in which the Company has or will invest in, and consequently, on the Company.

11

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS - continuedRaw Material Source

We could fail to complete the Arrangement.

 

The Arrangement may not be completed as there are certain conditions that are outside of our control and the control of Meta. The completion of the ArrangementCompany purchases its holographic raw materials from a tier 1 German manufacturer, which is subject to the satisfaction of a single source supplier. Disruption in supply from this supplier for any number of conditions which include, among others, (i) obtaining necessary approvals of securityholders and debtholders, if any, of us and Meta, (ii) that not more than 10% of the Meta shareholders exercise any dissent rights; (iii) the Pre-Closing Financing is completed (which has been satisfied); and (iv) performance by us and Meta of the respective obligations and covenants in the Arrangement Agreement. These conditionsfactors may not be satisfied.

In addition, we and Meta each have the right to terminate the Arrangement Agreement in certain circumstances. Accordingly, there is no certainty that the Arrangement Agreement will not be terminated by either us or Meta before the completion of the Arrangement. For example, we have the right, in certain circumstances, to terminate the Arrangement Agreement if changes occur that, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect. Although a material adverse effect excludes certain events that are beyond our control and the control of Meta, a change havingcause a material adverse effect on Meta may occur before the effective dateHolography-related products.

Change in Laws, Regulations and Guidelines

The current and proposed operations of the Arrangement, in which case we could electCompany are subject to terminatea variety of laws, regulations and guidelines relating to production, the Arrangement Agreementconduct of operations, transportation, storage, health and safety, medical device regulation and the Arrangement would not proceed.protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations, which could require the Company to incur substantial costs associated with compliance or alter certain aspects of its business plan. In addition, ifviolations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt certain aspects of the ArrangementCompany’s business plan and result in a material adverse effect on certain aspects of its planned operations.

The Company launched a new product metaAIR® in March 2019 to provide laser glare protection to pilots in the airline industry. Currently, metaAIR® is not subject to any Federal Aviation Administration regulations, however, metaAIR® may become subject to evolving regulation by governmental authorities as the metaAIR® market evolves further.

Integrating Past or Future Acquisitions

The Company has completed a number of acquisitions during its operating history. The Company has spent and may continue to spend significant resources identifying and pursuing future acquisition opportunities. Acquisitions involve numerous risks including: (1) difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies; (2) the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns; and (3) the potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies. Failure to achieve the anticipated benefits of any prior and future acquisitions or to successfully integrate the operations of the acquired companies could have a material and adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any future acquisitions could also result in potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities, acquisition or divestiture-related write-offs or the assumption of debt and contingent liabilities.

Regulatory Approval

The Company’s wireless sensing technology to enhance MRI and non-invasive glucoWISE® monitoring is under development. The Company has performed many experiments on animals and humans, and will continue to perform additional experiments as needed to continue the development of the related products.

These products have not yet completed clinical trials/regulatory approval processes, and there can be no assurance that trials will be successful, or that approvals will be granted.

Insurance Coverage

The Company will require insurance coverage for a number of risks. Although management of the Company believes that the events and amounts of liability covered by May 15, 2021, weits insurance policies will be reasonable, taking into account the risks relevant to its business, and the fact that agreements with users contain limitations of liability, there can be no assurance that such coverage will be available or Metasufficient to cover claims to which the Company may choosebecome subject. If insurance coverage is unavailable or insufficient to terminatecover any such claims, the Arrangement Agreement in accordanceCompany’s financial resources, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected.

11


Privacy and Data Security Concerns

Personal privacy, information security and data protection are significant issues worldwide. The regulatory framework governing the collection, use, and other processing of personal data and other information is rapidly evolving. The United States federal and various state and foreign governments have adopted or proposed requirements regarding the collection, distribution, use, security and storage of personally identifiable information and other data relating to individuals, and federal and state consumer protection laws are being applied to enforce regulations related to the online collection, use and dissemination of data.

The costs of compliance with its terms.

If the Arrangement is not completed, our ongoing businessand other burdens imposed by laws, regulations, standards and other actual or asserted obligations relating to privacy, data protection and information security may be adversely affectedsubstantial, and they may require the Company to modify its data processing practices and policies. Any actual or alleged noncompliance with any of these laws, regulations, standards, and other actual or asserted obligations may lead to claims and proceedings by governmental actors and private parties, and significant fines, penalties or liabilities.

Risk of Inability to Protect our Proprietary Technology and Intellectual Property Rights

The Company relies on a variety of intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, trade secrets, technical know-how and other unpatented proprietary information to protect the Company's technologies, products, product development and manufacturing activities from unauthorized use by third parties. The Company's patents do not cover all of its technologies, systems, products and product components and its competitors or others may design around its patented technologies. The Company cannot guarantee that it has entered into appropriate agreements with all parties that have had access to its trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information to adequately protect all such information. The Company also cannot assure shareholders that those agreements will provide meaningful protection for its trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use or disclosure. The Company's trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information could be obtained by third parties as a result of breaches of its physical or electronic security systems or its suppliers, employees or consultants could assert rights to its intellectual property.

Risk that Industry Targets will not Adopt the costs (including opportunity costs) incurredCompany’s Products

Holography Market-Aviation Industry

The Company launched its first product, a laser glare protection eyewear, named metaAIR®, in respectMarch 2019, with a primary focus on the aviation market. The product offers unique performance and benefits over the competition and is the only industry-approved solution to date. The Company has co-developed this product with Airbus through a strategic partnership. Airbus further extended its support by introducing the Company to Satair, an Airbus-owned company, which became the global distribution partner for metaAIR® to the aviation market. Since 2016, Airbus and Satair have invested a total of pursuing$2,000,000 for the Arrangement,product development and we could experience negative reactions fromexclusive distribution rights to metaAIR®. Since the financial markets, which could cause a decreaselaunch of metaAIR® in March 2019, the Company has sold fifty units to its distributor Satair. The Company is currently in the market priceprocess of our common stock, particularly ifincreasing its marketing and sales capacity.

Despite the market price reflects market assumptionsCompany’s close collaboration with the Airbus Group, with the impact of COVID-19 there can be no assurance that the Arrangementaviation market will be completed or completed on certain terms. Weaccept the metaAIR® product at the expected market penetration rates and a slower than forecasted market acceptance may also experience a negative impact on our ability to attract future acquisition opportunities. Failure to complete the Arrangement or a change in the terms of the Arrangement could each have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If the Arrangement is not completed and our board of directors decides to seek another merger or business combination, we may not be able to find a party willing to engage in a transaction that is equivalent to, or more attractive than, the Arrangement. In addition, in certain circumstances, we may be required to pay a termination payment of $2 million, or the Termination Payment, to Meta as described in the Proxy.

The Termination Payment, if triggered,Holography laser glare protection related products and the fact that certain of our stockholders have agreed to vote in favorCompany’s financial position. The Company is pursuing ancillary markets outside of the Arrangement related proposals at the special meeting of our stockholders to approve the Arrangement, may discourage other parties from attempting to acquire us.aviation industry for its metaAIR

®

Under the Arrangement Agreement, we are required to pay a Termination Payment of $2 million to Meta laser protection eyewear such as in the event the Arrangement Agreement is terminated in certain circumstances. The Termination Payment may discourage other parties from attempting to engage in a transaction with us or otherwise make an alternative Acquisition Proposal, even if those parties would otherwise be willing to offer greater value to our stockholders than that offered by Meta under the Arrangement.

Furthermore, as noted above, certain of our stockholders have agreed to irrevocably commit the shares to, among other things, vote in favor of the proposals related to the Arrangement at a special meeting of our stockholders. As a result, other parties may be discouraged from attempting to engage in a transaction with us, even if those parties would otherwise be willing to offer greater value to our stockholders than that offered by Meta under the Arrangement.

law enforcement and defense.

12

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS - continuedLithography Product and Market-Automotive

We will incur substantial transaction-related costsLithography related products have not yet reached required manufacturing maturity. The first pilot scale roll-to-roll line is expected to be ready for low volume production during the second half of fiscal year 2022. Broader sales and production are expected to be launched in connection with the Arrangement even if the Arrangement is not completed.

Certain costs relatedtwo to the Arrangement, such as legal, accounting and certain financial advisor fees must be paid by us even if the Arrangement is not completed, and some of such costs may be unanticipated, or underestimated by our management. Also, if the Arrangement is not completed, we may be required to pay the Termination Payment to Meta in certain circumstances. Such costs may offset any expected cost savings and other synergies from the Arrangement.

While the Arrangement is pending, we are restricted from taking certain actions.

The Arrangement Agreement restricts us from taking specified actions until the Arrangement is completed without the consent of Meta, which may adversely affect our ability to execute certain business strategies including, but not limited to, the ability in certain cases to enter into or amend contracts, acquire or dispose of assets, incur indebtedness or incur capital expenditures. These restrictions may prevent us from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to thethree years’ time after successful completion of automotive product qualification and product introductions. META believes that the Arrangement.

automotive market is a strategic high growth opportunity, however despite the Company’s close collaboration with automotive partners, there can be no assurance that the automotive market will accept the NANOWEB®

The pending Arrangementproduct at the expected market penetration rates and a slower than forecasted market acceptance may divert the attention of our management.

The pending Arrangement could cause the attention of our management to be diverted from the day-to-day operations. These disruptions could be exacerbated byhave a delay in the completion of the Arrangement and could have anmaterial adverse effect on our business, operating results or prospects, regardless of whetherLithography de-icing/de-fogging, transparent antenna and other related products and the Arrangement is ultimately completed.

Following the completion of the Arrangement, the combined company may issue additional securities.Company’s financial position.

 

Following

12


Risks Related to Facilities and Human Resources

New Facility and Permits for Lithography Production

The Company is in the completionprocess of moving into a larger facility suitable to host the scale-up of production relating to Holography and Lithography. Lithography is a wet chemistry process which requires specific approvals from the local government to allow use of certain chemicals and their disposal.

Any delay in setting up the facility and receiving permits may impact launch and/or development of related products, and may have a material adverse effect on Lithography and Holography related products and consequently on the Company’s financial position.

At present, the facility is expected to be complete during the second half of fiscal 2022.

Recruiting or Retaining Qualified Personnel.

The Company's ability to successfully manage and grow the business and to develop new products depends, in large part, on its ability to recruit and retain qualified employees, particularly highly skilled technical, sales, service, management, and key staff personnel. Competition for qualified resources is intense and other companies may have greater resources available to provide substantial inducements to offer more competitive compensation packages.

Conflicts of Interest

Certain of the Arrangement,Company’s directors and officers are, and may continue to be, involved in other business ventures through their direct and indirect participation in corporations, partnerships, joint ventures, etc. that may become potential competitors of the combinedtechnologies, products and services the Company intends to provide. Situations may arise in connection with potential acquisitions or opportunities where the other interests of these directors and officers conflict with or diverge from the Company’s interests. In accordance with applicable corporate law, directors who have a material interest in or who are a party to a material contract or a proposed material contract with the Company are required, subject to certain exceptions, to disclose that interest and generally abstain from voting on any resolution to approve the contract. In addition, the directors and officers are required to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the Company’s best interests. However, in conflict of interest situations, the Company’s directors and officers may owe the same duty to another company and will need to balance their competing interests with their duties to the Company. Circumstances (including with respect to future corporate opportunities) may issue additional securities (including equity securities) to finance its activities, including in order to finance acquisitions. If the combined company were to issue additional equity securities, the ownership interest of our existing stockholdersarise that may be diluted and some or allresolved in a manner that is unfavorable to the Company.

Reliance on Management

The success of the combined company’sCompany is dependent upon the ability, expertise, judgment, discretion, and good faith of its senior management team. Any loss of the services of such individuals could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results, or financial measures on a per share basiscondition.

Monitoring unauthorized use of the Company's intellectual property is difficult and costly. Unauthorized use of its intellectual property may have already occurred or may occur in the future. The Company's failure to identify unauthorized use or otherwise adequately protect its intellectual property could jeopardize its competitive advantage and materially adversely affect its business. Moreover, any litigation in connection with unauthorized use of its intellectual property could be reduced. Moreover, astime consuming, and the combined company’s intentionCompany could be forced to issue additional equity securities becomes publicly known,incur significant costs and divert its attention and the combined company’s share price may be materially adversely affected.

Our stockholdersefforts of its employees, which could, in turn, result in lower revenues and higher expenses, and it may not receive any dividendsbe successful in respect of the Series A Preferred Stock.enforcing its intellectual property rights.

 

Risks Related to Oil and Gas Assets Held for Sale

Series A Preferred Stock Dividends

In connection with the Arrangement, we will declarethe Company declared a dividend of shares of the Series A Preferred Stock to holders of record of ourits common stock as of a date to be determined by our board of directors. Such dividend will be paid immediately prior to the closing of the Arrangement.June 24, 2021. The Series A Certificate of Designation will entitleentitles the holders of Series A Preferred Stock to receive dividends, or Asset Sale Dividends, comprised of the holder’s pro rata portion of the proceeds from the sale of the O&G Assets (“O&G Asset Sales”) in the event that we or the combined companyCompany consummates one or more such transaction prior to the Sale Expiration Date. However, we or the combined companyCompany may not be able to consummate any such transaction prior to such date on terms that will permit us or the combined companyitself to pay such dividends, or at all.

13

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS - continued

 

13


Holders of Series A Preferred Stock will beare entitled to receive Asset Sale Dividends from any O&G Asset Sale that is consummated prior to the Sale Expiration Date.Sale. Prior to declaring or paying any dividend, the combined companyCompany will deduct from the gross proceeds of an O&G Asset Sale various costs and expenses described in the Series A Certificate of Designation, which include, among others, (i) costs and expenses we or the combined companyCompany incurs in connection with the applicable O&G Asset Sale transaction, (ii) costs the combined companyCompany incurs following the consummation of the Arrangement with respect to the O&G Assets, (iii) taxes the combined company incurs in connection with the applicable O&G Asset Sale, the payment of dividends to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, and the O&G Assets, (iv) liabilities the combined companyCompany incurs in connection with the applicable O&G Asset Sale and (v) amounts paid or payable with respect to outstanding debt, if any. In addition, the combined companyCompany will also withhold an amount of 10% of the proceeds from each O&G Asset Sale, (“the Holdback Amount”) to cover potential post-closing liabilities and obligations that the combined company may incur in respect of such transaction. If, after the deduction and withholding of these amounts, there are no net proceeds available for distribution to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, then the combined companyCompany will not declare or pay a dividend with respect to that transaction unless and until any remaining funds from the Holdback Amount are due to be distributed to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock through a dividend, or the combined companyCompany receives additional net proceeds from such O&G Asset Sale (for example, as a result of post-closing payments or the release of escrowed funds).

In the event that any O&G Assets have not been sold in an O&G Asset Sale that is consummated prior to the Sale Expiration Date, the combined companyCompany will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, declare a spin-off dividend to distribute beneficial ownership of the remaining O&G Assets to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock. However, if the combined company cannot effect such spin-off dividend in a manner that is exempt from registration under all applicable securities laws, the combined company will not declare the spin-off dividend and instead will use good faith, commercially reasonable efforts to preserve the value of the remaining O&G Assets or to distribute or provide the value of the remaining O&G Assets to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, so long as the combined companyCompany is not required to divert the attention of management or incur material expenses in excess of amount required to be reserved under the Arrangement Agreement. Thus, we, or the combined company,Company, ultimately may not be able to deliver the value of any remaining O&G Assets to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock.

 

The Series A Preferred Stock will not be listed or traded on any exchange.

The Series A Preferred Stock to be issued by us to holders of record of our common stock as of a record day fixed by our board of directorsOrogrande and will not be listed or traded on any exchange. No market is expected to develop for the Series A Preferred Stock in the foreseeable futureHazel Projects: Risks and holders of the Series A Preferred Stock may not be able to find a buyer and sell their shares if they desired to do so.

14

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS - continued

Risks Related to Torchlight’s Business and Industry if the Arrangement does not occur

We have a limited operating history relative to larger companies in our industry and may not be successful in developing profitable business operations.

We have a limited operating history relative to larger companies in our industry. Our business operations must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered in establishing a business in the oil and natural gas industries. As of the date of this report, we have generated limited revenues and have limited assets. We have an insufficient history at this time on which to base an assumption that our business operations will prove to be successful in the long-term. Our future operating results will depend on many factors, including:

our ability to raise adequate working capital;

the success of our development and exploration;

the demand for natural gas and oil;

the level of our competition;

our ability to attract and maintain key management and employees; and

our ability to efficiently explore, develop, produce or acquire sufficient quantities of marketable natural gas or oil in a highly competitive and speculative environment while maintaining quality and controlling costs.

To achieve profitable operations in the future, we must, alone or with others, successfully manage the factors stated above, as well as continue to develop ways to enhance our production efforts. Despite our best efforts, we may not be successful in our exploration or development efforts or obtain required regulatory approvals. There is a possibility that some, or all, of the wells in which we obtain interests may never produce oil or natural gas.

15

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS - continued

We have limited capital and will need to raise additional capital in the future.

We do not currently have sufficient capital to fund both our continuing operations and our planned growth should the Arrangement not occur. We will require additional capital to continue to grow our business via acquisitions and to further expand our exploration and development programs. We may be unable to obtain additional capital when required. Future acquisitions and future exploration, development, production and marketing activities, as well as our administrative requirements (such as salaries, insurance expenses and general overhead expenses, as well as legal compliance costs and accounting expenses) will require a substantial amount of additional capital and cash flow.

We may pursue sources of additional capital through various financing transactions or arrangements, including joint venturing of projects, debt financing, equity financing, or other means. We may not be successful in identifying suitable financing transactions in the time period required or at all, and we may not obtain the capital we require by other means. If we do not succeed in raising additional capital, our resources may not be sufficient to fund our planned operations.

Our ability to obtain financing, if and when necessary, may be impaired by such factors as the capital markets (both generally and in the oil and gas industry in particular), our limited operating history, the location of our oil and natural gas properties and prices of oil and natural gas on the commodities markets (which will impact the amount of asset-based financing available to us, if any) and the departure of key employees. Further, if oil or natural gas prices on the commodities markets decline, our future revenues, if any, will likely decrease and such decreased revenues may increase our requirements for capital. If the amount of capital we are able to raise from financing activities, together with our revenues from operations, is not sufficient to satisfy our capital needs (even to the extent that we reduce our operations), we may be required to cease our operations, divest our assets at unattractive prices or obtain financing on unattractive terms.

Any additional capital raised through the sale of equity may dilute the ownership percentage of our stockholders. Raising any such capital could also result in a decrease in the fair market value of our equity securities because our assets would be owned by a larger pool of outstanding equity. The terms of securities we issue in future capital transactions may be more favorable to our new investors, and may include preferences, superior voting rights and the issuance of other derivative securities, and issuances of incentive awards under equity employee incentive plans, which may have a further dilutive effect.

We may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we may issue, which may adversely impact our financial condition.

Our auditor indicated that certain factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.Uncertainties.

 

The financial statements included with this report are presented under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilitiesCompany is in the normal courseprocess of business over a reasonable length of time. We had a net loss of approximately $12.8 million forselling or spinning out the year ended December 31, 2020 and an accumulated deficit in aggregate of approximately $111.9 million at year end. We are not generating sufficient operating cash flows to support continuing operations and expect to incur further losses in the development of our business.

In our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, our auditor indicated that certain factors raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These factors included our accumulated deficit, as well as the fact that we were not generating sufficient operating cash flows to meet our regular working capital requirements. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management’s plan to address our ability to continue as a going concern includes: (1) obtaining debt or equity funding from private placement or institutional sources; (2) obtaining loans from financial institutions, where possible, or (3) participating in joint venture transactions with third parties. Although management believes that it will be able to obtain the necessary funding to allow us to remain a going concern through the methods discussed above, there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

16

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS- continued

As a non-operator, our development of successful operations relies extensively on third parties who, if not successful, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation.

If the Arrangement does not occur, we expect to primarily participate in wells operated by third parties. As a result, we will not control the timing of the development, exploitation, production and exploration activities relating to leasehold interests we acquire. We do, however, have certain rights as granted in our joint operating agreements that allow us a certain degree of freedom such as, but not limited to, the ability to propose the drilling of wells. If our drilling partners are not successful in such activities relating to our leasehold interests, or are unable or unwilling to perform, our financial condition and results of operation could have an adverse material effect.

Further, financial risks are inherent in any operation where the cost of drilling, equipping, completing and operating wells is shared by more than one person. We could be held liable for the joint activity obligations of the operator or other working interest owners such as nonpayment of costs and liabilities arising from the actions of the working interest owners. In the event the operator or other working interest owners do not pay their share of such costs, we would likely have to pay those costs. In such situations, if we were unable to pay those costs, there could be a material adverse effect to our financial position.

We are mainly concentrated in one geographic area, which increases our exposure to many of the risks enumerated herein.

Operating in a concentrated area increases the potential impact that many of the risks stated herein may have upon our ability to perform. For example, we have greater exposure to regulatory actions impacting Texas, natural disasters in the geographic area, competition for equipment, services and materials available in the area and access to infrastructure and markets. In addition, the effect of fluctuations on supply and demand may become more pronounced within specific geographic oil and gas producing areas such as the Permian Basin, which may cause these conditions to occur with greater frequency or magnify the effect of these conditions. Due to the concentrated nature of our portfolio of properties, a number of our properties could experience any of the same conditions at the same time, resulting in a relatively greater impact on our results of operations than they might have on other companies that have a more diversified portfolio of properties. Such delays or interruptions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to monetize the Orogrande and Hazel Projects at an attractive price, if at all, and the disposition of such assets may involve risks and uncertainties.

We have commenced a process that could result in the monetization of the Orogrande and Hazel Projects.O&G Assets. Such dispositions may result in proceeds to usSeries A preferred shareholders in an amount less than wethey expect or less than ourthe Company's assessment of the value of the assets. We doThe Company does not know if weit will be able to successfully complete such disposition on favorable terms or at all. In addition, the sale of these assets involves risks and uncertainties, including disruption to other parts of ourits business, potential loss of customers or revenue, exposure to unanticipated liabilities or result in ongoing obligations and liabilities to usthe Company following any such divestiture.

For example, in connection with a disposition, wethe Company may enter into transition services agreements or other strategic relationships, which may result in additional expense.expenses. In addition, in connection with a disposition, wethe Company may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of the business or assets. WeThe Company may also be required to indemnify the purchasers to the extent that ourits representations turn out to be inaccurate or with respect to certain potential liabilities. These indemnification obligations may require usthe Company to pay money to the purchasers as satisfaction of their indemnity claims. It may also take us longer than expected to fully realize the anticipated benefits of this transaction, and those benefits may ultimately be smaller than anticipated or may not be realized at all, which could adversely affect ourthe Company's business and operating results. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect ourthe Company's financial condition and results of operations.

 

Because of the speculative nature of oil and gas exploration, there is risk that we will not find commercially exploitable oil and gas and that our business will fail.

14


Oil and Gas Operations Liability or Damages

The search for commercial quantities of oil and natural gas as a business is extremely risky. We cannot provide investors with any assurance that any properties in which we obtain a mineral interest will contain commercially exploitable quantities of oil and/or gas. The exploration expenditures to be made by us may not result in the discovery of commercial quantities of oil and/or gas. Problems such as unusual or unexpected formations or pressures, premature declines of reservoirs, invasion of water into producing formations and other conditions involved in oil and gas exploration often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. If we are unable to find commercially exploitable quantities of oil and gas, and/or we are unable to commercially extract such quantities, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business plan, and as a result, any investment in us may become worthless.

Strategic relationships upon which we may rely are subject to change, which may diminish our ability to conduct our operations.

Should the Arrangement not occur, our ability to successfully acquire oil and gas interests, to build our reserves, to participate in drilling opportunities and to identify and enter into commercial arrangements with customers will depend on developing and maintaining close working relationships with industry participants and our ability to select and evaluate suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. These realities are subject to change and our inability to maintain close working relationships with industry participants or continue to acquire suitable property may impair our ability to execute our business plan.

17

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS- continued

To continue to develop our business should the Arrangement not occur, we will endeavor to use the business relationships of our management to enter into strategic relationships, which may take the form of joint ventures with other private parties and contractual arrangements with other oil and gas companies, including those that supply equipment and other resources that we will use in our business. We may not be able to establish these strategic relationships, or if established, we may not be able to maintain them. In addition, the dynamics of our relationships with strategic partners may require us to incur expenses or undertake activities we would not otherwise be inclined to in order to fulfill our obligations to these partners or maintain our relationships. If our strategic relationships are not established or maintained, our business prospects may be limited, which could diminish our ability to conduct our operations.

The price of oil and natural gas has historically been volatile. If it were to decrease substantially, our projections, budgets, and revenues would be adversely affected, potentially forcing us to make changes in our operations.

Should the Arrangement not occur, our future financial condition, results of operations and the carrying value of any oil and natural gas interests we acquire will depend primarily upon the prices paid for oil and natural gas production. Oil and natural gas prices historically have been volatile and likely will continue to be volatile in the future, especially given current world geopolitical conditions. Our cash flows from operations are highly dependent on the prices that we receive for oil and natural gas. This price volatility also affects the amount of our cash flows available for capital expenditures and our ability to borrow money or raise additional capital. The prices for oil and natural gas are subject to a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. These factors include:

the level of consumer demand for oil and natural gas;

the domestic and foreign supply of oil and natural gas;

the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls;

the price of foreign oil and natural gas;

domestic governmental regulations and taxes;

the price and availability of alternative fuel sources;

weather conditions;

market uncertainty due to political conditions in oil and natural gas producing regions, including the Middle East; and

worldwide economic conditions.

These factors as well as the volatility of the energy markets generally make it extremely difficult to predict future oil and natural gas price movements with any certainty. Declines in oil and natural gas prices affect our revenues and could reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we can produce economically. Accordingly, such declines could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, oil and natural gas reserves and the carrying values of our oil and natural gas properties. If the oil and natural gas industry experiences significant price declines, we may be unable to make planned expenditures, among other things. If this were to happen, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business operations, which would cause the value of an investment in us to decline or become worthless.

In early March of 2020, the market experienced a precipitous decline in oil prices in response to oil demand concerns due to the economic impacts of the a highly transmissible and pathogenic coronavirus known as COVID-19 and anticipated increases in supply from Russia and OPEC, particularly Saudi Arabia. Generally, demand for oil has declined substantially. These trends materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, and, unless conditions in our industry improve, this trend will continue.

If oil or natural gas prices remain depressed or drilling efforts are unsuccessful, we may be required to record additional write downs of our oil and natural gas properties.

If oil or natural gas prices remain depressed or drilling efforts are unsuccessful, we could be required to write down the carrying value of certain of our oil and natural gas properties. Write downs may occur when oil and natural gas prices are low, or if we have downward adjustments to our estimated proved reserves, increases in our estimates of operating or development costs, deterioration in drilling results or mechanical problems with wells where the cost to redrill or repair is not supported by the expected economics.

Under the full cost method of accounting, capitalized oil and gas property costs less accumulated depletion and net of deferred income taxes may not exceed an amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10%, of estimated future net revenues from proved oil and gas reserves plus the cost of unproved properties not subject to amortization (without regard to estimates of fair value), or estimated fair value, if lower, of unproved properties that are subject to amortization. Should capitalized costs exceed this ceiling, an impairment would be recognized.

The Company recognized an impairment charge of $2,108,301 in 2020 and $1,494,769 in 2019.

18

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS- continued

Because of the inherent dangers involved in oil and gas operations, there is a risk that we may incur liability or damages as we conduct our business operations, which could force us to expend a substantial amount of money in connection with litigation and/or a settlement.

The oil and natural gas business involves a variety of operating hazards and risks such as well blowouts, pipe failures, casing collapse, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, fires, spills, pollution, releases of toxic gas and other environmental hazards and risks. These hazards and risks could result in substantial losses to usthe Company from, among other things, injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution or other environmental damage, cleanup responsibilities, regulatory investigation and penalties and suspension of operations. In addition, wethe Company may be liable for environmental damages caused by previous owners of property purchased and leased by us.itself. In recent years, there has also been increased scrutiny on the environmental risk associated with hydraulic fracturing, such as underground migration and surface spillage or mishandling of fracturing fluids including chemical additives. This technology has evolved and continues to evolve and become more aggressive. We believeThe Company believes that new techniques can increase estimated ultimate recovery per well to over 1.0 million barrels of oil equivalent and have increased initial production two or three-fold. We believeThe Company believes that recent designs have seen improvement in, among other things, proppant per foot, barrels of water per stage, fracturing stages, and clusters per fracturing stage. As a result, substantial liabilities to third parties or governmental entities may be incurred, the payment of which could reduce or eliminate the funds available for exploration, development or acquisitions or result in the loss of ourthe Company's properties and/or force usit to expend substantial monies in connection with litigation or settlements. In addition, we will need to quickly adapt to the evolving technology, which could take time and divert our attention to other business matters. WeThe Company currently havehas no insurance to cover such losses and liabilities, and even if insurance is obtained, it may not be adequate to cover any losses or liabilities. We cannot predict the availability of insurance or the availability of insurance at premium levels that justify our purchase. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could materially and adversely affect ourthe Company's financial condition and operations. We may elect to self-insure if management believes that the cost of insurance, although available, is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. The occurrence of an event not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's financial condition and results of operations.

 

The market for oil and gas is intensely competitive, and competition pressures could force us to abandon or curtail our business plan.Estimates of the Volume of Reserves

The market for oil and gas exploration services is highly competitive, and we only expect competition to intensify in the future. Numerous well-established companies are focusing significant resources on exploration and are currently competing with us for oil and gas opportunities. Other oil and gas companies may seek to acquire oil and gas leases and properties that we have targeted. Additionally, other companies engaged in our line of business may compete with us from time to time in obtaining capital from investors. Competitors include larger companies which, in particular, may have access to greater resources, may be more successful in the recruitment and retention of qualified employees and may conduct their own refining and petroleum marketing operations, which may give them a competitive advantage. Actual or potential competitors may be strengthened through the acquisition of additional assets and interests. Additionally, there are numerous companies focusing their resources on creating fuels and/or materials which serve the same purpose as oil and gas but are manufactured from renewable resources.

As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully and competitive pressures may adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition, should the Arrangement not occur. If we are not able to successfully compete in the marketplace, we could be forced to curtail or even abandon our current business plan, which could cause any investment in us to become worthless.

We may not be able to successfully manage growth, which could lead to our inability to implement our business plan.

Any growth of the company may place a significant strain on our managerial, operational and financial resources, especially considering that we currently only have a small number of executive officers, employees and advisors. Further, as we enter into additional contracts, we will be required to manage multiple relationships with various consultants, businesses and other third parties. These requirements will be exacerbated in the event of our further growth or in the event that the number of our drilling and/or extraction operations increases. Our systems, procedures and/or controls may not be adequate to support our operations or that our management will be able to achieve the rapid execution necessary to successfully implement our business plan. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected, which could lead to us being forced to abandon or curtail our business plan and operations.

The due diligence undertaken by us in connection with all of our acquisitions may not have revealed all relevant considerations or liabilities related to those assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

19

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS- continued

The due diligence undertaken by us in connection with the acquisition of our properties may not have revealed all relevant facts that may be necessary to evaluate such acquisitions. The information provided to us in connection with our diligence may have been incomplete or inaccurate. As part of the diligence process, we have also made subjective judgments regarding the results of operations and prospects of the assets. If the due diligence investigations have failed to correctly identify material issues and liabilities that may be present, such as title defects or environmental problems, we may incur substantial impairment charges or other losses in the future. In addition, we may be subject to significant, previously undisclosed liabilities that were not identified during the due diligence processes and which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Our operations are heavily dependent on current environmental regulation, changes in which we cannot predict.

Oil and natural gas activities that we will engage in, including production, processing, handling and disposal of hazardous materials, such as hydrocarbons and naturally occurring radioactive materials (if any), are subject to stringent regulation. We could incur significant costs, including cleanup costs resulting from a release of hazardous material, third-party claims for property damage and personal injuries fines and sanctions, as a result of any violations or liabilities under environmental or other laws. Changes in or more stringent enforcement of environmental laws could force us to expend additional operating costs and capital expenditures to stay in compliance.

Various federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, directly impact oil and gas exploration, development and production operations, and consequently may impact our operations and costs. These regulations include, among others, (i) regulations by the Environmental Protection Agency and various state agencies regarding approved methods of disposal for certain hazardous and non-hazardous wastes; (ii) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and analogous state laws which regulate the removal or remediation of previously disposed wastes (including wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators), property contamination (including groundwater contamination),and remedial plugging operations to prevent future contamination; (iii) the Clean Air Act and comparable state and local requirements which may result in the gradual imposition of certain pollution control requirements with respect to air emissions from our operations; (iv) the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 which contains numerous requirements relating to the prevention of and response to oil spills into waters of the United States; (v) the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act which is the principal federal statute governing the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes; and (vi) state regulations and statutes governing the handling, treatment, storage and disposal of naturally occurring radioactive material.

We believe that we will be in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. To date, we have not expended any amounts to comply with such regulations, and we do not currently anticipate that future compliance will have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, if we are deemed to not be in compliance with applicable environmental laws, we could be forced to expend substantial amounts to be in compliance, which would have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition.

Government regulatory initiatives relating to hydraulic fracturing could result in increased costs and additional operating restrictions or delays.

Vast quantities of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil deposits exist in deep shale and other unconventional formations. It is customary in our industry to recover these resources through the use of hydraulic fracturing, combined with horizontal drilling. Hydraulic fracturing is the process of creating or expanding cracks, or fractures, in deep underground formations using water, sand and other additives pumped under high pressure into the formation. As with the rest of the industry, our third-party operating partners use hydraulic fracturing as a means to increase the productivity of most of the wells they drill and complete. These formations are generally geologically separated and isolated from fresh ground water supplies by thousands of feet of impermeable rock layers.

We believe our third-party operating partners follow applicable legal requirements for groundwater protection in their operations that are subject to supervision by state and federal regulators. Furthermore, we believe our third-party operating partners’ well construction practices are specifically designed to protect freshwater aquifers by preventing the migration of fracturing fluids into aquifers.

Hydraulic fracturing is typically regulated by state oil and gas commissions. Some states have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations that could impose more stringent permitting, public disclosure, and/or well construction requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations.

In addition to state laws, some local municipalities have adopted or are considering adopting land use restrictions, such as city ordinances, that may restrict or prohibit the performance of well drilling in general and/or hydraulic fracturing in particular. There are also certain governmental reviews either underway or being proposed that focus on deep shale and other formation completion and production practices, including hydraulic fracturing. Depending on the outcome of these studies, federal and state legislatures and agencies may seek to further regulate such activities. Certain environmental and other groups have also suggested that additional federal, state and local laws and regulations may be needed to more closely regulate the hydraulic fracturing process.

Further, the EPA has asserted federal regulatory authority over hydraulic fracturing involving “diesel fuels” under the Solid Waste Disposal Act’s Underground Injection Control Program. The EPA is also engaged in a study of the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing activities on drinking water resources in the states where the EPA is the permitting authority. These actions, in conjunction with other analyses by federal and state agencies to assess the impacts of hydraulic fracturing could spur further action toward federal and/or state legislation and regulation of hydraulic fracturing activities.

20

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS- continued

We cannot predict whether additional federal, state or local laws or regulations applicable to hydraulic fracturing will be enacted in the future and, if so, what actions any such laws or regulations would require or prohibit. Restrictions on hydraulic fracturing could make it prohibitive for our third-party operating partners to conduct operations, and also reduce the amount of oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas that we are ultimately able to produce in commercial quantities from our properties. If additional levels of regulation or permitting requirements were imposed on hydraulic fracturing operations, our business and operations could be subject to delays, increased operating and compliance costs and process prohibitions.

Our estimates of the volume of reserves could have flaws, or such reserves could turn out not to be commercially extractable. As a result, our future revenues and projections could be incorrect.

Estimates of reserves and of future net revenues prepared by different petroleum engineers may vary substantially depending, in part, on the assumptions made and may be subject to adjustment either up or down in the future. OurThe Company's actual amounts of production, revenue, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, and quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves may vary substantially from the estimates. Oil and gas reserve estimates are necessarily inexact and involve matters of subjective engineering judgment. In addition, any estimates of ourits future net revenues and the present value thereof are based on assumptions derived in part from historical price and cost information, which may not reflect current and future values, and/or other assumptions made by usmanagement that only represent our best estimates. If these estimates of quantities, prices and costs prove inaccurate, weThe Company may be unsuccessful in expanding our oil and gas reserves base with our acquisitions. Additionally, if declines in and instability of oil and gas prices occur, then write downs in the capitalized costs associated with any oil and gas assets we obtainit obtains may be required. Because of the nature of the estimates of ourthe Company's reserves and estimates in general, reductions to our estimated proved oil and gas reserves and estimated future net revenues may not be required in the future, and/or that our estimated reserves may not present and/or commercially extractable. If ourthe Company's reserve estimates are incorrect, weit may be forced to write down the capitalized costs of our oil and gas properties.

Decommissioning Costs are Unknown and May be Substantial

Decommissioning costs are unknown and may be substantial. Unplanned costs could divert resources from other projects.

WeThe Company may become responsible for costs associated with abandoning and reclaiming wells, facilities and pipelines which we useit uses for production of oil and natural gas reserves. Abandonment and reclamation of these facilities and the costs associated therewith is often referred to as “decommissioning.” We accrueThe Company accrues a liability for decommissioning costs associated with ourits wells but have not established any cash reserve account for these potential costs in respect of any of our properties. If decommissioning is required before economic depletion of our properties or if ourthe Company's estimates of the costs of decommissioning exceed the value of the reserves remaining at any particular time to cover such decommissioning costs, wethe Company may have to draw on funds from other sources to satisfy such costs. The use of other funds to satisfy such decommissioning costs could impair our ability to focus capital investment in other areas of our business.

Challenges to the Properties May Impact the Company's Financial Condition.

We may have difficulty distributing production, which could harm our financial condition.

In order to sell the oil and natural gas that we are able to produce, if any, the operators of the wells we obtain interests in may have to make arrangements for storage and distribution to the market. We will rely on local infrastructure and the availability of transportation for storage and shipment of our products, but infrastructure development and storage and transportation facilities may be insufficient for our needs at commercially acceptable terms in the localities in which we operate. This situation could be particularly problematic to the extent that our operations are conducted in remote areas that are difficult to access, such as areas that are distant from shipping and/or pipeline facilities. These factors may affect our and potential partners’ ability to explore and develop properties and to store and transport oil and natural gas production, increasing our expenses.

Furthermore, weather conditions or natural disasters, actions by companies doing business in one or more of the areas in which we will operate, or labor disputes may impair the distribution of oil and/or natural gas and in turn diminish our financial condition or ability to maintain our operations.

Our business will suffer if we cannot obtain or maintain necessary licenses.

Our operations, should the Arrangement not occur, will require licenses, permits and in some cases renewals of licenses and permits from various governmental authorities. Our ability to obtain, sustain or renew such licenses and permits on acceptable terms is subject to change in regulations and policies and to the discretion of the applicable governments, among other factors. Our inability to obtain, or our loss of or denial of extension of, any of these licenses or permits could hamper our ability to produce revenues from our operations.

Challenges to our properties may impact our financial condition.

Title to oil and gas interests is often not capable of conclusive determination without incurring substantial expense. While we havethe Company has made and intendintends to make appropriate inquiries into the title of properties and other development rights we haveit has acquired and intendintends to acquire, title defects may exist. In addition, wethe Company may be unable to obtain adequate insurance for title defects, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all. If title defects do exist, it is possible that wethe Company may lose all or a portion of our right, title and interests in and to the properties to which the title defects relate. If ourthe property rights are reduced, ourthe Company's ability to conduct our exploration, development and production activities may be impaired. To mitigate title problems, common industry practice is to obtain a title opinion from a qualified oil and gas attorney prior to the drilling operations of a well.

21

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS- continued

 

We rely15


Continuing Drilling Obligations Under Leases May Not be Met.

The leases for the Orogrande properties include additional drilling requirements for 2022 and 2023. The Company is intending to sell or spin out the leases in 2022 and transfer the ongoing obligations to the new owners of the leases. If such a transfer is not completed in a timely manner in 2022, the Company may be forced to seek an extension from the lessor of the lease drilling obligations or fund the additional activities out of working capital which could adversely impact the Company’s financial condition.

The Company's Ability to Maintain its Rights Under the Leases is Dependent on Numerous Factors Outside of its Control.

The leased assets are held for sale. The Company's ability to attract capital to enable on-going compliance with the lease obligations depends upon numerous factors largely beyond our control. These factors include:

oil, NGLs and natural gas prices;
global supply and demand for oil, NGLs and natural gas;
the overall state of the financial markets, including investor appetite for debt and equity securities issued by oil and natural gas companies and the effects of economic recessions or depressions;
the ability to secure and maintain financing on acceptable terms;
legislative, environmental and regulatory matters;
oil and natural gas reservoir quality;
the availability of drilling rigs, completions equipment and other facilities and equipment;
the ability to access lands;
the ability to access water for hydraulic fracturing operations;
reliance on vendors, suppliers, contractors and service providers;
shortages of sufficiently skilled labor, or labor disagreements resulting in unplanned work stoppages;
changes to free trade agreements;
inflation and other unexpected cost increases, including with respect to materials and labor;
prevailing interest and foreign exchange rates;
royalty and tax rates;
physical impacts from adverse weather conditions and natural disasters;
transportation and processing interruptions or constraints, including the availability and proximity of pipeline and processing capacity;
technology failures; and accidents

Risks Related to conduct our business, and our technology could become ineffective or obsolete.Legal Matters

 

We rely on technology, including geographic and seismic analysis techniques and economic models,Litigation

The Company is currently subject to develop our reserve estimates and to guide our exploration, development and production activities. We and our operator partners will be required to continually enhance and update our technology to maintain its efficacy and to avoid obsolescence. The costs of doing so may be substantialsecurities class action litigation and may be higher thansubject to similar or other litigation in the costs that we anticipate for technology maintenancefuture, all of which will require significant management time and development. If we are unable to maintain the efficacy of our technology, our ability to manage our businessattention, result in significant legal expenses and to compete may be impaired. Further, even if we are able to maintain technical effectiveness, our technologyresult in unfavorable outcomes, which may not be the most efficient means of reaching our objectives, in which case we may incur higher operating costs than we would were our technology more efficient.

The loss of key personnel would directly affect our efficiency and profitability.

Our future success, should the Arrangement not occur, is dependent, in a large part, on retaining the services of our current management team. Our executive officers possess a unique and comprehensive knowledge of our industry and related matters that are vital to our success within the industry. The knowledge, leadership and technical expertise of these individuals would be difficult to replace. The loss of one or more of our officers could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company's business, operating results and financial performance, including our abilitycondition, and negatively affect the price of its common stock.

The Company is, and may in the future become, subject to developvarious legal proceedings and execute our long-term business strategy. We do not maintain key-man life insurance with respect to any employees. We do have employment agreements with eachclaims that arise in or outside the ordinary course of ourbusiness. For example, the Company currently has securities class action complaints pending against itself, its chief executive officers.officer, and its chief financial officer, asserting that they made false or misleading statements. The complaints seek monetary damages, costs and expenses. For more information, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and “Note 28 – Commitments and Contingencies” of the Company's consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

 

We have limited management and staff and are dependent upon partnering arrangements and third-party service providers.16


We currently have four full-time employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The lossCompany cannot predict the outcome of these individuals would haveproceedings or provide an adverse effect on our business, as we have very limited personnel. We leverageestimate of potential damages, if any. The Company believes that the services of other independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, including engineering, oil and gas well planning and supervision, and land, legal, environmental and tax services. We also pursue alliances with partnersclaims in the areas of geologicalsecurities class actions are without merit and geophysical services and prospect generation, evaluation and prospect leasing. Our dependence on third-party consultants and service providers createintend to defend against them vigorously. Regardless, failure by the Company to obtain a number of risks, including but not limited to:

the possibility that such third parties may not be available to us as and when needed; and

the risk that we may not be able to properly control the timing and quality of work conducted with respect to its projects.

If we experience significant delays in obtaining the services of such third parties or they perform poorly, our results of operations and stock price could be materially adversely affected.

Our officers and directors control a significant percentage of our current outstanding common stock and their interests may conflict with those of our stockholders.

Asfavorable resolution of the date of this report, our executive officers and directors collectively and beneficially own approximately 16.1% of our outstanding common stock (see Item 12 of this report for an explanation of how this number is computed). This concentration of voting control gives these affiliates substantial influence over any matters whichclaims set forth in the complaints could require a stockholder vote, including without limitation the election of directors and approval of merger and/or acquisition transactions, even if their interests may conflict with those of other stockholders. It could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in controlit to pay damage awards or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of us. Thisenter into settlement arrangements for which its insurance coverage may be insufficient. Any such damage awards or settlement arrangements in current or future litigation could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock or prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium over the then prevailing market prices for their shares of common stock.

In the future, we may incur significant increased costs as a result ofCompany's business, operating as a public company, and our management may be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

In the future, we may incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses as a result of operating as a public company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these new compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect these new rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to incur substantial costs to maintain the same or similar coverage.

In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal controls for financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In particular, we are required to perform system and process evaluation and testing on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In performing this evaluation and testing, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2020. Our continued compliance with Section 404, will require that we incur substantial accounting expense and expend significant management efforts. We do not have an internal audit group. We have however, engaged independent professional assistance for the evaluation and testing of internal controls.

22

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS- continued

Terrorist attacks or cyber-incidents could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/results or financial loss.

Like most companies, we have become increasingly dependent upon digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructurecondition. Even if plaintiffs’ claims are not successful, defending against class action litigation is expensive and cloud applicationscould divert management’s attention and services, to operate our businesses, to process and record financial and operating data, communicate with our business partners, analyze mine and mining information, estimate quantitiesresources, all of coal reserves, as well as other activities related to our businesses. Strategic targets, such as energy-related assets, may be at greater risk of future terrorist or cyber-attacks than other targets in the United States. Deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure of third parties, or cloud-based applications could lead to corruption or loss of our proprietary data and potentially sensitive data, delays in production or delivery, difficulty in completing and settling transactions, challenges in maintaining our books and records, environmental damage, communication interruptions, other operational disruptions and third-party liability. Our insurance may not protect us against such occurrences. Consequently, it is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them,which could have a material adverse effect on ourits business, operating results and financial condition and negatively affect the price of its common stock. In addition, such lawsuits may make it more difficult for the Company to finance its operations in the future.

Ongoing Government Investigation by the SEC

In September 2021, the Company received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Enforcement, in a matter captioned In the Matter of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. The subpoena requests that the Company produces certain documents and information related to, among other things, the merger involving Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Metamaterial Inc. The Company is cooperating and intends to continue to cooperate with the SEC’s investigation. Investigations of this nature are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted. Regardless of the outcome, the SEC Investigation has had and may continue to have an adverse impact on the Company because of legal costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors. The SEC Investigation could also result in reputational harm to the Company, which, among other things, may limit its ability to obtain new customers and enter into new agreements with its existing customers, or its ability to obtain financing, and have a material adverse effect on its current and future business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, as cyber incidents continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to cyber incidents.prospects.

 

We have adopted an Information Security Policy and Acceptable Use StatementRisks Related to address precautions with respect to data security and we have created an Incident Response Plan which outlines appropriate responses in case of a reported breach. These policies and plan have been executed in coordination with our independent Information Technology Service provider.Financial Reporting

 

Certain Factors Related to Our Common StockMaterial Weakness in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There presentlyManagement is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) and for evaluating and reporting on the effectiveness of our system of internal control. Effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to provide timely, reliable and accurate financial reports, identify and proactively correct any deficiencies, material weaknesses or fraud and meet our reporting obligations. As disclosed in Part II, Item 9A, Management identified material weaknesses during fiscal year 2021. Remediation efforts place a limited market forsignificant burden on management and add increased pressure on its financial reporting resources and processes. If the Company is unable to successfully remediate this material weakness in a timely manner, or if any additional material weaknesses in our common stock,internal control over financial reporting are identified, the accuracy of our financial reporting and the price of our common stockCompany's ability to timely file with the SEC may be volatile.

Our common stock is currently quoted on The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. There has been and may continue to be volatility in the volume and market price of our common stock moving forward. This volatility may be caused by a variety of factors, including the lack of readily available quotations, the absence of consistent administrative supervision of “bid” and “ask” quotations, and generally lower trading volume.adversely impacted. In addition, factors such as quarterly variationsif the Company's remedial efforts are insufficient, or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our operating results, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, or our failure to meet our or their projected financial and operating results, litigation involving us, factors relating to the oil and gas industry, actions by governmental agencies, national economic and stock market considerations, as well as other events and circumstances beyond our control could have a significant impact on the future market price of our common stock and the relative volatility of such market price.

Securities analysts may not initiate coverage or continue to cover our shares of common stock and this may have a negative impact on the market price of our shares of common stock.

The trading market for our shares of common stock will depend, in part, on the research and reports that securities analysts publish about our business and our shares of common stock. We do not have any control over these analysts. If securities analysts do not cover our shares of common stock, the lack of research coverage may adversely affect the market price of those shares. If securities analysts do cover our shares of common stock, they could issue reports or recommendations that are unfavorable to the price of our shares of common stock, and they could downgrade a previously favorable report or recommendation, and in either case our share prices could decline as a result of the report. If one or more of these analysts does not initiate coverage, ceases to cover our shares of common stock or fails to publish regular reports on our business, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share prices or trading volume to decline.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Our stockholders could sell substantial amounts of common stock in the public market, including shares sold upon the filing of a registration statement that registers such shares and/or upon the expiration of any statutory holding period under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), if available, or upon the expiration of trading limitation periods. Such volume could create a circumstance commonly referred to as a market “overhang” and in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. Additionally, we have a large number of warrants that are presently exercisable. The exercise of a large amount of these securities followed by the subsequent sale of the underlying stock in the market would likely have a negative effect on our common stock’s market price. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make it more difficult for us to secure additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securitiesits internal controls occur in the future, at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

Our directors and officers have rights to indemnification.

Our Bylaws provide, as permitted by governing Nevada law, that we will indemnify our directors, officers, and employees, whether or not then in service as such, against all reasonable expenses actually and necessarily incurred by him or her in connection with the defense of any litigation to which the individual may have been made a party because he or she is or was a director, officer, or employee of the company. The inclusion of these provisions in the Bylaws may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, and may discourage or deter stockholders or management from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breach of their duty of care, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise have benefited us and our stockholders.

23

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS- continued

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends, if any, wouldCompany could be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements, and general financial condition. The payment of any dividends will be within the discretion of our Board of Directors. We presently intend to retain all earnings, if any, to implement our business strategy; accordingly, we do not anticipate the declaration of any dividends in the foreseeable future.

NASDAQ may delist our common stock from trading on its exchange, which could limit shareholders’ ability to trade our common stock.

As a listed company on NASDAQ, we are required to meet certainrestate our financial public float, bid price and liquidity standards on an ongoing basis in order to continue the listing of our common stock. If we fail to meet these continued listing requirements, our common stock may be subject to delisting. If our common stock is delisted and we are not able to list our common stock on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities would be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, our shareholders could face significant material adverse consequences, including limited availability of market quotations for our common stock and reduced liquidity for the trading of our securities. In addition, we could experience a decreased ability to issue additional securities and obtain additional financing in the future.

Issuance of our stock in the future could dilute existing shareholders and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We have the authority to issue up to 150,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, and to issue options and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. We are authorized to issue significant amounts of common stock in the future, subject only to the discretion of our board of directors. These future issuances could be at values substantially below the price paid for our common stock by investors. In addition, we could issue large blocks of our stock to fend off unwanted tender offers or hostile takeovers without further shareholder approval. Because the trading volume of our common stock is relatively low, the issuance of our stock may have a disproportionately large impact on its price compared to larger companies.

Our stock price has fluctuated in the past, has recently been volatile and may be volatile in the future, and as a result, investors in our common stock could incur substantial losses.

Our stock price has fluctuated in the past, has recently been volatile and may be volatile in the future. By way of example, on January 4, 2021, the price of our common stock closed at $0.71 per share while on February 16, 2021, our stock price closed at $4.29 per share.  We may incur rapid and substantial decreases in our stock price in the foreseeable future that are unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. In addition, the recent outbreak of the novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) has caused broad stock market and industry fluctuations. The stock market in general and the market for companies such as ours in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, investors may experience losses on their investment in our common stock. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including the following:

investor reaction to our business strategy;

the success of competitive products or technologies;

our continued compliance with the NASDAQ listing standards;

regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries, especially changes in laws or regulations applicable to our products;

actions taken by regulatory agencies with respect to our products, manufacturing process or sales and marketing terms;

variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;

the success of our efforts to acquire or in-license additional products or product candidates;

developments concerning our collaborations or partners;

developments or disputes concerning patents or other proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain patent protection for our products;

our ability or inability to raise additional capital and the terms on which we raise it;

declines in the market prices of stocks generally;

trading volume of our common stock;

actual or purported “short-squeeze” trading activity;

sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders;

24

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS - continued

general economic, industry and market conditions; and

other events or factors, including those resulting from such events, or the prospect of such events, including war, terrorism and other international conflicts, public health issues including health epidemics or pandemics, such as the recent outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), and natural disasters such as fire, hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados or other adverse weather and climate conditions, whether occurring in the United States or elsewhere, could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of our suppliers or result in political or economic instability.

These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. Further, recent increases are significantly inconsistent with any improvements in actual or expected operating performance, financial condition or other indicators of value. Since the stock price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past, has been recently volatile and may be volatile in the future, investors in our common stock could incur substantial losses. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention and resources,statements, which could materially and adversely affect ourits business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. There can be no guarantee that ourfinancial condition, restrict its ability to access the capital markets, require it to expend significant resources to correct the material weaknesses or deficiencies, subject the Company to regulatory investigations and penalties, harm its reputation, cause a decline in investor confidence or otherwise cause a decline in its stock price will remain at current levels or that future sales of our common stock will not be at prices lower than those sold to investors.price.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

 

        Additionally, securities of certain companies have recently experienced significant and extreme volatility in stock price due short sellers of shares of common stock, known as a “short squeeze.”  These short squeezes have caused extreme volatility in both the stock prices of those companies and in the market and have led to the price per share of those companies to trade at a significantly inflated rate that is disconnected from the underlying value of the company. Many investors who have purchased shares in those companies at an inflated rate face the risk of losing a significant portion of their original investment, as in many cases the price per share has declined steadily as interest in those stocks have abated. While we have no reason to believe our shares would be the target of a short squeeze, there can be no assurance that we won’t be in the future, and you may lose a significant portion or all of your investment if you purchase our shares at a rate that is significantly disconnected from our underlying value.17


Item 2. Properties.

 

The issuance of preferred stock in the future could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock.Company’s registered office is located at 85 Swanson Road, Boxborough, Massachusetts 01719, and its principal executive office is located at 1 Research Drive, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

 

An issuance of preferred stock could result in a class of outstanding securities that would have preferences with respect to voting rights and dividends and in liquidation overThe Company's principal facilities include the common stock and could, upon conversion or otherwise, have all of the rights of our common stock. Our board of directors’ authority to issue preferred stock could discourage potential takeover attempts or could delay or prevent a change in control through merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise by making these attempts more difficult or costly to achieve.following:

Location

Lease expiration

Approximate size
(sqft)

Primary functions

 Boxborough, Massachusetts

September 30, 2023

4,414

 Administration

 Research Drive, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia

month-to-month

8,792

 Administration, Research and Development, and Production

 Highfield Park, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia

August 31, 2031

68,000

 Administration, Research and Development, and Production

 Pleasanton, California

September 30, 2026

19,506

 Research and Development and Production

 London, United Kingdom

October 19, 2022

742

 Research and Development

 Burnaby, British Columbia

April 30, 2025

7,860

 Administration and Research and Development

 Thurso, Quebec

Owned

105,000

 Production and Research and Development

 Maroussi, Athens

October 31, 2031

15,457

 Research and Development

 Steinhausen, Switzerland

June 30, 2022

1,335

 Research and Development

 Plano, Texas

July 31, 2022

3,299

 Administration

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal executive offices are located at 5700 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 3600, Plano, Texas 75093. We currently sublease this office space which totals approximately 3,181 square feet. We believe that

The Company also acquired
the conditionfollowing properties as part of the Torchlight RTO on June 28, 2021. Comparative figures in Item 2 refer to the financial information of Torchlight as the legal acquirer and size of our offices are adequatenot the accounting acquirer. Refer to note 5 in Item 8. "Financial Statements and supplementary data" for our current needs.more details.

 

Investments into support oil and gas properties during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $14.2 million and 2019 are detailed as follows:

  2020  2019 
Property acquisition costs $-  $- 
Development costs $3,472,281  $6,641,467 
Exploratory costs $-  $- 
         
Totals $3,472,281  $6,641,467 

Property development costs presented above exclude interest capitalized into the full cost pool of $2,353,700 in 2020 and $2,858,753 in 2019.

The development costs for 2020 include work in the Orogrande and Hazel projects in west Texas. No development costs were incurred for Oklahoma properties in 2020.

25

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES- continued

Oil and Natural Gas Reserves$3.4 million respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had no proved reserves. At December 31, 2019 we had proved reserves related only to the Warwink project which was sold on November 11, 2020 (effective November 1, 2020). The Hazel and Orogrande Projects consist only of unevaluated properties in progress of development for future production. At December 31, 20202021, there are no proved nonproducing reserves related to these properties. The Oklahoma properties are marginal producing wells which are not economic in the context of proved reserve value. The estimates of our 2019 proved reserves and the PV-10 set forth herein reflect estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development costs, using prices and costs under existing economic conditions. The amounts shown do not give effect to non-property related expenses, such as corporate general administrative expenses and debt service, future income taxes or to depreciation, depletion and amortization.

  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2020 
  Reserves  Future Net Revenue (M$) 
              Present Value Discounted 
Category Oil (Bbls)  Gas (Mcf)  Total (BOE)  Total  at 10% 
                
Proved Producing  0   0   0  $-  $- 
Proved Undeveloped  0   0   0  $-  $- 
Total Proved  0   0   0  $-  $- 
                     
Standardized Measure of Future Net Cash Flows Related to Proved Oil and Gas Properties                 $- 
                     
Probable Undeveloped  0   0   0  $-  $- 
                     
  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2019 
  Reserves  Future Net Revenue (M$) 
              Present Value Discounted 
Category Oil (Bbls)  Gas (Mcf)  Total (BOE)  Total  at 10% 
                
Proved Producing  14,700   21,100   18,217  $634  $514 
Proved Nonproducing  0   0   0  $-  $- 
Total Proved  14,700   21,100   18,217  $634  $514 
                     
Standardized Measure of Future Net Cash Flows Related to Proved Oil and Gas Properties                 $539 
                     
Probable Undeveloped  0   0   0  $-  $- 

 

The decrease in producing reserves from 2019 to 2020 from 18,217 to -0- BOE is related toCompany has not included the sale of the Winkler properties on November 11, 2020 (effective November 1, 2020).

Reserve values as of December 31, 2019 are related to a single producing well in the Warwink Project.

BOE equivalents are determined by combining barrels of oil with MCF of gas divided by six.

26

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES- continued

Standardized Measure of Oil & Gas Quantities - Volume Rollforward
Year Ended December 31, 2020

The following table sets forth the Company’s net proved reserves, including the changes therein, and proved developed reserves:

  Crude Oil (Bbls)  Natural Gas (Mcf)  BOE 
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES:            
Beginning of period  14,710   21,130   18,232 
Revisions of previous estimates  -   -   - 
Extensions, discoveries and other additions  -   -   - 
Divestiture of Reserves  (9,265)  (16,132)  (11,954)
Acquisition of Reserves  -   -   - 
Production  (5,445)  (4,998)  (6,278)
End of period  -   -   - 

Standardized Measure of Oil & Gas Quantities - Volume Rollforward
Year Ended December 31, 2019

The following table sets forth the Company’s net proved reserves, including the changes therein, and proved developed reserves:

  Crude Oil (Bbls)  Natural Gas (Mcf)  BOE 
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES:            
Beginning of period  974,780   156,940   1,000,937 
Revisions of previous estimates  (944,985)  (121,400)  (965,218)
Extensions, discoveries and other additions  -   -   - 
Divestiture of Reserves  -   -   - 
Acquisition of Reserves  -   -   - 
Production  (15,085)  (14,410)  (17,487)
End of period  14,710   21,130   18,232 

27

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES- continued

Standardized Measure of Oil & Gas Quantities
Year Ended December 31, 2020 & 2019

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves is as follows :given there hasn't been any expected future cash inflows.

 

  2020  2019 
       
Future cash inflows $-  $843,040 
Future production costs  -   (196,670)
Future development costs  -   - 
Future income tax expense  -   - 
Future net cash flows  -   646,370 
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows  -   (107,070)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to proved reserves $-  $539,300 

A summary of the changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows applicable to proved oil and natural gas reserves is as follows:

  2020  2019 
Balance, beginning of period $539,300  $5,341,330 
Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production (lifting) costs related to future production  (632,020)  1,176,090 
Changes in estimated future development costs  -   1,851,760 
Net change due to revisions in quantity estimates  -   (5,896,344)
Accretion of discount  107,070   (868,787)
Other  -   (1,763,161)
         
Net change due to extensions and discoveries  -   - 
Net change due to sales of minerals in place  (9,452)  - 
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced during the period  (4,898)  (294,912)
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the period  -   993,324 
Net change in income taxes  -   - 
Balance, end of period $-  $539,300 

Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, both proved and probable reserves are subject to change as additional information becomes available. The estimates of reserves, future cash flows, and present value are based on various assumptions, including those prescribed by the SEC, and are inherently imprecise. Although we believe these estimates are reasonable, actual future production, cash flows, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, and quantities of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves may vary substantially from these estimates.

In estimating probable reserves, it should be noted that those reserve estimates inherently involve greater risk and uncertainty than estimates of proved reserves. While analysis of geoscience and engineering data provides reasonable certainty that proved reserves can be economically producible from known formations under existing conditions and within a reasonable time, probable reserves involve less certainty than reserves with a higher classification due to less data to support their ultimate recovery. Probable reserves have not been discounted for the additional risk associated with future recovery. Prospective investors should be aware that as the categories of reserves decrease with certainty, the risk of recovering reserves at the PV-10 calculation increases. The reserves and net present worth discounted at 10% relating to the different categories of proved and probable have not been adjusted for risk due to their uncertainty of recovery and thus are not comparable and should not be summed into total amounts.

Reserve Estimation Process, Controls and Technologies

No reserve report has been prepared for 2021 or 2020. The only properties that had measurable reserves at December 31, 2019 were sold on November 11, 2020 (effective November 1, 2020). The only other producing properties owned by the Company are those located in Oklahoma which are marginally producing and are uneconomic for reserve calculation purposes.

 

The reserve estimates for 2019, including PV-10 estimates, set forth above were prepared by PeTech Enterprises, Inc. for the Company’s properties in Oklahoma and Texas. The calculations were prepared using standard geological and engineering methods generally accepted by the petroleum industry and in accordance with SEC financial accounting and reporting standards.

28

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES- continued

We do not have any employees with specific reservoir engineering qualifications in the company. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer worked closely with PeTech Enterprises Inc. in connection with their preparation of our reserve estimates for 2019, including assessing the integrity, accuracy, and timeliness of the methods and assumptions used in this process.

PeTech Enterprises, Inc. (“PeTech”), who provided 2019 reserve estimates for our properties, is a Texas based family owned oil and gas production and investment company that provides reservoir engineering, economics and valuation support to energy banks, energy companies and law firms as an expert witness. PeTech has been in business since 1982. Amiel David is the President of PeTech and the primary technical person in charge of the estimates of reserves and associated cash flow and economics on behalf of the company for the results presented in its reserves report to us. He has a PhD in Petroleum Engineering from Stanford University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Texas (PE #50970), granted in 1982, a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and a member of the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers.

Proved Nonproducing Reserves

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, ourthe Company's proved nonproducing reserves totaled -0-were 0 barrels of oil equivalents (BOE) compared to -0- as of December 31, 2019..

At the end of 20202021 and 20192020, reserves did not include any value for proved undeveloped properties. This was due to the lack of intent to drill additional wells in the Hazel area by the Company which reflects the decision to focus capital and attention to development in the Orogrande area. Provision has been made to maintain the Hazel leases in effect through renegotiation of the terms of the mineral leases.

WeThe Company made investments and development progress during 20202021 to develop proved producing reserves in the Orogrande and Hazel ProjectsProject in the Permian Basin in West Texas. AsThe Company incurred cost of December 31, 2020, nine test wells have been developed$14.2 million in relation to certain drilling activity carried out to remain in compliance with all aspects of the Orogrande ProjectCompany's lease obligations and six test wells have been developed into satisfy the Hazel Project.Continuous Drilling Clause ("CDC") with University Lands.

 

As of December 31, 2020, the Hazel project was subject to an option agreement.18


The Warwink project was sold on November 11, 2020 (effective November 1, 2020).

Our current drilling plans, subject to sufficient capital resources and the periodic evaluation of interim drilling results and other potential investment opportunities, include drilling additional evaluation wells in the Orogrande AMI to continue to derisk the prospect and obtain initial production from the development efforts.

Production, Price, and Production Cost History

During the year ended December 31, 2020, wethe Company produced and sold 5,445 barrels of oil net to ourits interest at an average sale price of $34.48 per bbl. WeIt produced and sold 4,998 MCF of gas net to ourits interest at an average sales price of $1.13 per MCF. OurIts average production cost including lease operating expenses and direct production taxes was $30.02 per BOE. OurIts depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense was $130.68 per BOE.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, we produced and sold 13,784 barrels of oil net to our interest at an average sale price of $51.95 per bbl. We produced and sold 22,208 MCF of gas net to our interest at an average sales price of $1.36 per MCF. Our average production cost including lease operating expenses and direct production taxes was $25.81 per BOE. Our depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense was $251.25 per BOE.

Our The 2020 production was from properties located in central Oklahoma and in west Texas. Reserves at the end of 2019 were 100% from the Warwink properties in west Texas. For 2020, approximately 614 BOE was produced in Oklahoma and 5,664 BOE produced in Texas, or 10% from Oklahoma and 90% from wells in west Texas.

29

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES- continued

Quarterly Revenue and Production by State for 2020 and 2019 are detailed as follows:

Property Quarter Oil Production {BBLS} Gas Production {MCF} Oil Revenue  Gas Revenue  Total Revenue 
                
Oklahoma Q1 - 2020 181 468 $583  $1,000  $1,583 
Hazel (TX) Q1 - 2020 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
MECO (TX) Q1 - 2020 1,863 1,559 $81,530  $1,507  $83,037 
Total Q1-2020   2,044 2,027 $82,113  $2,507  $84,620 
                   
Oklahoma Q2 - 2020 28 448 $774  $156  $930 
Hazel (TX) Q2 - 2020 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
MECO (TX) Q2 - 2020 1,389 747 $44,223  $324  $44,547 
Total Q2-2020   1,417 1,195 $44,997  $480  $45,477 
                   
Oklahoma Q3 - 2020 69 1,096 $2,084  $494  $2,578 
Hazel (TX) Q3 - 2020 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
MECO (TX) Q3 - 2020 1,480 680 $57,774  $1,370  $59,144 
Total Q3-2020   1,549 1,776 $59,858  $1,864  $61,722 
                   
Oklahoma Q4 - 2020 0 0 $1,042  $773  $1,815 
Hazel (TX) Q4 - 2020 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
MECO (TX) Q4 - 2020 435 0 $9,837  $5,519  $15,356 
MECO (Sold 11/1/20) YTD ADJ 0 0 $(10,092) $(5,519) $(15,611)
Total Q4-2020   435 0 $787  $773  $1,560 
                   
2020 Year To Date 5,445 4,998 $187,755  $5,624  $193,379 
                   
Oklahoma Q1 - 2019 56 1,072 $2,567  $2,333  $4,900 
Hazel (TX) Q1 - 2019 2,864 0 $131,901  $-  $131,901 
MECO (TX) Q1 - 2019 3,525 2,565 $167,677  $6,359  $174,036 
Total Q1-2019   6,445 3,637 $302,145  $8,692  $310,837 
                   
Oklahoma Q2 - 2019 43 1,770 $2,477  $2,450  $4,927 
Hazel (TX) Q2 - 2019 1,123 0 $64,302  $-  $64,302 
Meco (TX) Q2 - 2019 2,585 2,623 $156,259  $11,587  $167,846 
Total Q2-2019   3,751 4,393 $223,038  $14,037  $237,075 
                   
Oklahoma Q3 - 2019 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
Hazel (TX) Q3 - 2019 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
Meco (TX) Q3 - 2019 1,320 4,522 $71,064  $78  $71,142 
Total Q3-2019   1,320 4,522 $71,064  $78  $71,142 
                   
Oklahoma Q4 - 2019 166 3,766 $8,873  $1,895  $10,768 
Hazel (TX) Q4 - 2019 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
Meco (TX) Q4 - 2019 2,102 5,890 $110,894  $5,547  $116,441 
Total Q4-2019   2,268 9,656 $119,767  $7,442  $127,209 
                   
2019 Year To Date   13,784 22,208 $716,014  $30,249  $746,263 

30

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES- continued

Drilling Activity and Productive Wells

Combined Well Status

The following table summarizes development activity and Well Status as of December 31, 2020:

  Cumulative Well Status  Developed (Sold)  Cumulative Well Status 
Drilling Activity/Well Status at 12/31/2020  2020  at 12/31/2019 
  Gross  Net  Gross  Net  Gross  Net 
                   
Development Wells:                        
Productive -Texas (Hazel)  1.00   0.80   -   -   1.00   0.80 
Productive -Texas (Warwink)  -   -   (1.00)  (0.13)  1.00   0.13 
Productive - Okla  2.00   0.40   -   -   2.00   0.40 
Test Wells  - Orogrande  9.00   5.69   -   -   9.00   5.69 
Test Wells  - Hazel  6.00   4.80   -   -   6.00   4.80 
                         
Exploration Wells:                        
Productive  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Dry  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                         
                         
Total Drilled Wells:                        
Productive -Texas  1.00   0.80   (1.00)  (0.13)  2.00   0.93 
Productive - Okla  2.00   0.40   -   -   2.00   0.40 
Test Wells  15.00   10.49   -   -   15.00   10.49 
                         
                         
Acquired Wells:                        
Productive -Texas  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Productive - Okla  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                         
                         
Total Wells:                        
Productive -Texas  1.00   0.80   (1.00)  (0.13)  2.00   0.93 
Productive - Okla  2.00   0.40   -   -   2.00   0.40 
Test Wells  15.00   10.49   -   -   15.00   10.49 
                         
Total  18.00   11.69   (1.00)  (0.13)  19.00   11.82 
                         
Well Type:                        
Oil  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Gas  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Combination - Oil and Gas  3.00   1.20   (1.00)  (0.13)  4.00   1.33 
Test Wells  15.00   10.49   -   -   15.00   10.49 
                         
Total  18.00   11.69   (1.00)  (0.13)  19.00   11.82 

31

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES- continued

Our acreage positions at December 31, 2020 are summarized as follows:

        TRCH Interest  TRCH Interest 
  Total Acres  Developed  Acres  Undeveloped Acres 
Leasehold Interests - 12/31/2020 Gross  Net   Gross  Net  Gross  Net 
                   
Texas - Orogrande  134,000   89,110   -   -   134,000   89,110 
Hazel Project  12,203   9,762   320   256   11,883   9,506 
                         
Oklahoma - Viking  640   192   640   192   -   - 
                         
Total  146,843   99,064   960   448   145,883   98,616 

 

Current ProjectsDuring the year ended December 31, 2021, there was no oil or gas production.

 

As of December 31, 2020, we had interests in three oil and gas projects: the Orogrande Project in Hudspeth County, Texas, the Hazel Project in Sterling, Tom Green, and Irion Counties, Texas, and the Hunton wells in partnership with Kodiak Ventures in central Oklahoma.

See the description under “Current Projects” below under Note 4, “Oil & Gas Properties,” of the financial statements included with this report for information and disclosure regarding these projects, which description is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On January 31, 2020, Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Torchlight Energy, Inc. and Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC were served with a lawsuit brought by Goldstone Holding Company, LLC (Goldstone(Goldstone Holding Company, LLC v. Torchlight Energy, Inc., et al., in the 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas). On February 24, 2020, Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., Torchlight Energy, Inc., and Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC timely filed their answer, affirmative defenses, and requests for disclosure. The suit, which seekssought monetary relief over $1 million, makesmade unspecified allegations of misrepresentations involving a November 2015 participation agreement and a 2016 amendment to the participation agreement. Torchlight has denied the allegations and has asserted several affirmative defenses including but not limited to, that the suit is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, that the claims havehad been released, and that the claims arewere barred because of contractual disclaimers between sophisticated parties. Torchlight has also asserted counterclaims for attorney fees. On January 14, 2021, Goldstone Holding Company, LLC dismissed its claims without prejudice, leaving Torchlight’s counterclaims for attorney fees as the only pending claim in the case. On February 26, 2021, Torchlight filed a non-suit without prejudice on its counterclaims for attorney fees, leaving no claims in the case. The court signed a final order disposing of the entire case on March 5, 2021. However, Goldstone Holding Company, LLC asked the court to re-instate its claims. That matter is set forclaims, and a hearing was held on March 25,April 13, 2021. IfOn June 16, 2021, the court doessigned an order denying the motion to reinstate Goldstone Holding Company’s, LLC’s claims, and the case Torchlight intends to re-assert its attorney fees claim and to contest Goldstone’s claims.is closed.

On April 30, 2020, ourThe Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Hudspeth Oil Corporation, filed suit against Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies. The suit seeks the recovery of approximately $1.4 million in costs incurred as a result of a tool failure during drilling activities on the University Founders A25 #2 well that is located in the Orogrande Field. Working interest owner Wolfbone Investments, LLC, a company owned by ourthe Company's former Chairman Gregory Mccabe,McCabe, is a co-plaintiff in that action. After the suit was filed, Cordax filed a mineral lien in the amount of $104,500.01$104,500 against the Orogrande Field and has sued the operator and counterclaimed against HudpspethHudspeth for breach of contract, seeking the same amount as the lien. We are contesting the lien in good faith. We haveThe Company has added the manufacturer of one of the tool components that we contendthe Company contends was a cause of the tool failure. It was later discovered that Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies forfeited its charter to conduct business in the State of Texas by failing to timely pay its franchise taxes, and the Company added members of the board of directors to the case pursuant to the Texas Tax Code. It was recently disclosed that Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies is the subsidiary of a Canadian parent company, Cordax Evaluation Technologies, Inc., who has also been added to the case. The suit, Hudspeth Oil Corporation and Wolfbone Investments, LLC v. Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies,, was filed in the 189th189th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. The Company’s current Chairman of the Board filed a special appearance after being served with citation, alleging that he was a Canadian citizen with no meaningful ties to Texas. After discovery was conducted on this issue, the Company filed a nonsuit without prejudice for this Defendant, dismissing him from the case. The remaining parties are currently engaged in preliminary discovery and are scheduling mediation.

On March 18, 2021, Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies filed a lawsuit in Hudspeth County, Texas seeking to foreclose its mineral lien against the Orogrande Field in the amount of $104,500.01 and recover related attorney’s fees. The foreclosure action, Datalog LWT Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies v. Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., was filed in the 205th Judicial District Court of Hudspeth County, Texas. The Company is contesting the lien in good faith and filed a Plea in Abatement on May 10, 2021, seeking a stay in the Hudspeth County lien foreclosure case pending final disposition of the related case currently pending in Harris County, Texas.

In September 2021, the Company received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Enforcement, in a matter captioned In the Matter of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. The subpoena requests that the Company produces certain documents and information related to, among other things, the merger involving Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Metamaterial Inc. The Company is cooperating and intends to continue to cooperate with the SEC’s investigation. The Company can offer no assurances as to the outcome of this investigation or its potential effect, if any, on the Company or its results of operation.

 

19


ITEM

On January 3, 2022, a putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York captioned Maltagliati v. Meta Materials Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-07203, against the Company, its Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer, Torchlight’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Torchlight’s former Chief Executive Officer. The complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of the Company’s publicly traded securities from September 21, 2020 through and including December 14, 2021, asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) arising primarily from a short-seller report and statements related to the Company’s business combination with Torchlight. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages and reasonable costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees.

On January 26, 2022, a similar putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York captioned McMillan v. Meta Materials Inc., et al., No. 1:22-cv-00463. This complaint names the same defendants and asserts the same claims on behalf of the same purported class as the Maltagliati action. The Company believes these actions (collectively, the “Securities Class Action”) have no merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against these allegations.

On January 14, 2022, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Easter District of New York captioned Hines v. Palikaras, et al., No. 1:22-cv-00248. The complaint names as defendants certain of the Company’s current officers and directors, certain former Torchlight officers and directors, and the Company (as nominal defendant). The complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of the Company, asserts claims under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, contribution claims under Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act, and various state law claims such as breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment. The complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages in favor of the Company, certain corporate governance related actions, and an award of costs and expenses to the derivative plaintiff, including attorneys’ fees. The Company believes this action has no merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against these allegations.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURESMine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

 

Not Applicable.20

32


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIESMarket Information for Common Stock

 

OurThe Company's common stock is quoted on Thethe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC ("NASDAQ") under the symbol, “TRCH.” Trading in our“MMAT”. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had outstanding common stock has historically been limited and occasionally sporadic andshares of 284,573,316 out of which there were 88,274,449 Exchangeable Shares held on the quotations set forth below are not necessarily indicative of actual market conditions.Canadian Securities Exchange ("CSE") under the symbol "MMAX".

 

The average daily volume of MMAT on NASDAQ from June 28, 2021 through December 31, 2021 was 14,258,758 .

The Exchangeable Shares were listed in connection with the completion of the Torchlight RTO where former holders of Metamaterial Inc.’s common shares (that were previously traded on the CSE) were entitled to receive 1.845 of the Company's common shares for each previously held common share of Metamaterial Inc. or in Exchangeable Shares of a wholly-owned subsidiary of META that reflect the same exchange ratio on issuance.



Holders of Record Holders

 

As of March 18,December 31, 2021, there were approximately 207 stockholders87 holders of record of ourthe Company's common stock and we estimate that there were approximately 103,000 additional beneficial stockholders who hold their shares in “street name” through a brokerage firm or other institution. As of March 18, 2021, we have a total of 145,313,667listed on NASDAQ. Because many shares of MMAT's common stock issuedare held by brokers and outstanding.other institutions on behalf of stockholders, the Company is unable to estimate the total number of beneficial owners of its common stock.

 

The holdersHolders of the Company's common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.

Holders of the Company's common stock have no preemptive rights and no right to convert their common stock into any other securities. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock.

 

Equity Compensation Plan InformationRecent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

The following table sets forthbelow details all equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2020:

        Number of 
        securities 
        remaining 
        available 
        for future 
  Number of     issuance 
  securities to  Weighted-  under 
  be issued  average  equity 
  upon  exercise  compensation 
  exercise of  price of  plans 
  outstanding  outstanding  (excluding 
  options,  options,  securities 
  warrants  warrants  reflected in 
Plan Category and rights  and rights  column (a)) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  5,417,768  $.96   4,582,232 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not Applicable.

33

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Information set forth and discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Results of Operations is derived from our historical financial statements andunregistered common shares issued by the related notes thereto whichCompany during the fiscal year 2021. These shares are included in this Form 10-K. The following informationthe issued and discussion should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and notes. Additionally, this Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Planoutstanding share count of Operations contain certain statements that are not strictly historicalthe Company at December 31, 2021 and are “forward-looking” statements withinadjusted to reflect the meaning1:2 reverse stock split of the Private Securities Litigation Reform ActCompany’s common stock effected immediately prior to the closing of 1995 and involve a high degreethe Arrangement agreement. With the exception of risk and uncertainty. Actual results may differ materially from those projectedthe shares issuable to Metamaterial holder in connection with the forward-looking statements dueArrangement Agreement, all other unregistered shares contained restrictions subjecting them to other risks and uncertainties that exist in our operations, development efforts, and business environment, and due to other risks and uncertainties relating to our ability to obtain additional capital in the future to fund our planned expansion, the demand for oil and natural gas, and other general economic factors.Rule 144.

 

All forward-looking statements included herein are basedcommon shares referenced in the below table represents shares issued by Meta Materials Inc., previously Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. ("Torchlight"), after adjustment of reverse stock split on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.June 25, 2021.

 

Summary of Key Results

2021

Exercised Warrants

1,619,547

Principal of converted notes

8,362,899

Payment in Kind

93,165

Service fees paid in stock

285,868

Shares issued to Metamaterial Inc. Shareholders*

196,968,803

Total Unregistered Shares

207,330,282

 

Overview

We are engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation, and/or development of oil and natural gas properties in the United States, principally in West Texas.

The West Texas properties demonstrate significant potential and future production capabilities based upon the analysis of scientific data being gathered in the day by day development activity. Therefore, the Board has determined to focus its efforts and capital on these projects to maximize shareholder value for the long run.

During 2019 and 2020 the Company continued development in the Orogrande Project. Additional development of test wells was continued to capture additional science data to support lease value. Our Warwink project was sold in 2020 and* Issued under an Option Agreement was executed in 2020 for the proposed sale of our Hazel project.exemption from registration under Section 3(a)(10)

 

In August 2020, our subsidiaries entered into an option agreement with a third party (which was amendedaddition to the common shares detailed above, in September 2020), under which, in exchange for satisfying certain drilling obligations, the third party will have the option to purchase the entire Hazel Project by a date no later than May 31, 2021. In JanuaryJune 2021 the third party notified usCompany issued a total of its intent164,923,363 Series A Preferred Shares to exercise its option to perform operations sufficient to satisfy the remaining drilling obligations.shareholders of record of Torchlight as of June 24, 2021.

 

Our strategy in divesting of projects other than the Orogrande Project has been to refocus on the greatest potential future value for the Company while systematically eliminating debt as noncore assets are sold and operations are streamlined.

21


Stock Performance Graph

 

Arrangement AgreementThis performance graph shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with Metamaterialthe SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Meta Materials Inc., Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.


The following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return for the Company's common stock, the Russell 2000 (RUT), and the Nasdaq Composite Index (COMP) beginning December 30, 2016, and ending December 31, 2021. The graph assumes that $100 was invested at the market close on beginning December 30, 2016 in the common stock of MMAT, COMP, and RUT. The stock price performance of the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

 

On December 14, 2020, we and our newly formed subsidiaries, Canco and Callco, entered into an arrangement agreement, or the Arrangement Agreement, with Metamaterial Inc., an Ontario corporation headquartered in Nova Scotia, Canada, or Meta. Under the Arrangement Agreement, Canco is to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of Meta by way of a statutory plan of arrangement under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), or the Arrangement, on and subject to the terms and conditions of the Arrangement Agreement. On February 3, 2021, we and our Ontario subsidiaries entered into an amendment to the Arrangement Agreement with Meta.

img228943222_0.jpg 


Item 6. [Reserved]

 

The disclosure under “Item 1. Business” is incorporated herein by reference, including the sections titled “Arrangement Agreement with Metamaterial.”

22


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following discussion and analysis of ourthe Company's financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our auditedits consolidated financial statements and related notes, each included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current plans, expectations and beliefs that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors, including those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” included under Part I, Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report. See “Note about Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report.

This Report on Form 10-K contains references to the Company's trademarks and to trademarks belonging to other entities. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Report on Form 10-K, including logos, artwork and other visual displays, may appear without the ® or TM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that the Company will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, the Company's rights or the rights of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names. We do not intend for the years endedCompany's use or display of other companies’ trade names or trademarks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of the Company by any other companies.

OVERVIEW

Meta Materials Inc. (the “Company” or “META” or “Resulting Issuer”) is a developer of high-performance functional materials and nanocomposites specializing in metamaterial research and products, nanofabrication, and computational electromagnetics. The Company’s registered office is located at 85 Swanson Road, Boxborough, Massachusetts 01719, and its principal executive office is located at 1 Research Drive, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s Business

During March 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. This has resulted in governments worldwide enacting emergency measures to combat the spread of the virus. In response, the Company’s management implemented a Work-From-Home policy for management and non-engineering employees in all of the Company’s locations for various periods through Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2021 as was required or deemed prudent by management. Engineering staff continued to work on given tasks and followed strict safety guidelines. As of November 2021, the majority of the Company’s employees had returned to the workplace. Although the Company’s supply chain has slowed down, the Company is currently able to maintain inventory of long lead items and is working with its suppliers to optimize future supply orders

COVID-19 has impacted the Company’s 2020 and 2021 sales of its metaAIR® laser protection eyewear product. Worldwide restrictions on travel are significantly impacting the airline industry and purchasing of metaAIR® eyewear has not been the primary spending focus of airline companies emerging from the financial impacts of COVID-19, however, the Company is pursuing sales in adjacent markets such as consumer, military and law enforcement. The situation is dynamic and the ultimate duration and magnitude of the impact of COVID-19 on the economy and financial effect specific to the Company cannot be quantified or known at this time.

BUSINESS AND OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS

Throughout 2021, the Company’s activities were focused on its research and development efforts as well as expansion of its intellectual property estate. As the Company moves into 2022, new emphasis will be placed on investments in pilot scale manufacturing of NANOWEB® products, expansion of its production capacity in our banknote and brand security lines and more aggressive design, development and clinical testing of its array of medical products. These efforts represent an efficient approach to monetizing the Company's intellectual property assets.

Highfield Park facility

The Company leased approximately 53,000 square foot facility in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, with the lease commencing on January 1, 2021. The facility will host the Company’s holography and lithography R&D labs and manufacturing operations. The Company also amended this lease agreement on June 9, 2021 to expand the leased space by approximately 15,000 square feet, reduce the annual rent for the 10-year term of the lease and obtain from the landlord CA$0.5 million in cash to fund ongoing tenant improvements. In exchange, the landlord received 993,490 shares of MMI common stock at CA$3.40 per share. As at December 31, 20202021, the Company has purchased equipment for approximately $1.5 million as well as spent $3.84 million on construction work. The Company will continue to incur additional construction and 2019 included herewith. This discussion should not be construed to imply that the results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the future, or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future. Such discussion represents only the best present assessment by our management.equipment costs through 2022.

 

Historical Results23


Pleasanton facility

During 2021, the Company signed multiple lease amendments with its lessor in Pleasanton, California to expand the leased space of the facility in the United States to include additional space of 14,379 square feet as well as extend the duration of the leased spaces until September 30, 2026. The Company has spent approximately $4.3 million on equipment including its first pilot scale roll-to-roll line which is expected to be ready for low volume production during the second half of fiscal year 2022. The Company has also spent $1 million on leasehold improvements

Thurso facility

As part of the Nanotech acquisition, the Company acquired property plant and equipment with an estimated fair value of $25.8 million including a 105,000 square foot facility in Thurso, Quebec. Approximately 35,000 square feet is being utilized for existing production capacity, and the remaining 70,000 square feet is available to expand output to facilitate future growth.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenue and Gross Profit

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Product sales

 

 

407,915

 

 

 

2,905

 

 

 

405,010

 

 

 

13942

%

 

 

23,745

 

 

 

(20,840

)

 

 

-88

%

Development revenue

 

 

3,674,602

 

 

 

1,119,278

 

 

 

2,555,324

 

 

 

228

%

 

 

878,665

 

 

 

240,613

 

 

 

27

%

Total Revenue

 

 

4,082,517

 

 

 

1,122,183

 

 

 

2,960,334

 

 

 

264

%

 

 

902,410

 

 

 

219,773

 

 

 

24

%

Cost of goods sold

 

 

675,973

 

 

 

3,254

 

 

 

672,719

 

 

 

20674

%

 

 

9,172

 

 

 

(5,918

)

 

 

-65

%

Gross Profit

 

 

3,406,544

 

 

 

1,118,929

 

 

 

2,287,615

 

 

 

204

%

 

 

893,238

 

 

 

225,691

 

 

 

25

%

Gross Profit percentage

 

 

83

%

 

 

100

%

 

 

-17

%

 

 

 

 

 

99

%

 

 

1

%

 

 

 

Product sales include products, components, and samples sold to various customers. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company began earning revenue from development samples sold to certain customers. The $0.4 million increase in product sales in 2021 compared to 2020 is due to:

$0.3 million in revenue from sale of development samples of NANOWEB®
$0.1 million in Nano-optic product sales in Q4 2021 generated by Nanotech subsequent to its acquisition by the Company
Incidental revenue generated by product sales of holoOPTIXTM to different customers

There was minimal change in product sales between 2019 and 2020.

Development revenue is comprised of revenue from contract services and other development revenue. The increase in development revenue of $2.6 million in 2021 compared to 2020 is primarily due to:

$1.7 million in revenue recognized by Nanotech from contract services subsequent to its acquisition by the Company. Nanotech currently derives a significant portion of its revenue from contract services with a confidential G10 central bank. In 2021, Nanotech entered into a development contract for up to $41.5 million over a period of up to five years. These contract services incorporate both nano-optic and optical thin film technologies and are focused on developing authentication features for future banknotes.
$1 million in revenue recognized subsequent to achieving performance conditions of the Cooperation Framework Agreement with Covestro Deutschland AG.
$0.2 million decrease in other development revenue with lower research and development revenue generated from customers in 2021 compared to 2020.

The increase in development revenue of $0.2 million in 2020, compared to 2019, is Primarily due to revenue recognized from statements of work with different customers.

The increase of $0.7 million in cost of sales in 2021, compared to 2020, is primarily due to $0.17 million in cost of sales incurred by Nanotech subsequent to its acquisition by the Company, as well as $0.16 million in cost of sales incurred in generating other product sales. There was minimal decrease in cost of sales in 2020 compared to 2019.

24


Operating expenses

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Operating Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling & Marketing

 

 

2,267,354

 

 

 

1,064,659

 

 

 

1,202,695

 

 

 

113

%

 

 

1,125,719

 

 

 

(61,060

)

 

 

-5

%

General & Administrative

 

 

29,699,601

 

 

 

6,707,858

 

 

 

22,991,743

 

 

 

343

%

 

 

4,819,737

 

 

 

1,888,121

 

 

 

39

%

Research & Development

 

 

9,497,427

 

 

 

4,102,791

 

 

 

5,394,636

 

 

 

131

%

 

 

3,825,194

 

 

 

277,597

 

 

 

7

%

Total operating expenses

 

 

41,464,382

 

 

 

11,875,308

 

 

 

29,589,074

 

 

 

249

%

 

 

9,770,650

 

 

 

2,104,658

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The increase in selling and marketing expenses in 2021, compared to 2020, is primarily due to:

$0.6 million increase in salaries and benefits due to:
o
$0.2 million in salaries and benefits costs incurred by Nanotech subsequent to its acquisition by the Company.
o
$0.4 million increased cost for new hires in 2021 as part of the Company’s expansion and building a sales and marketing team.
$0.2 million increase in consulting fees for market research and various investor relations campaigns as the Company sought to list on the NASDAQ.
$0.2 million increase in trade shows and travel and entertainment due to the market rebound after COVID-19 and reopening of trade shows. The Company participated in global tradeshows including AWE in USA and Asia for augmented reality ("AR") and 5G networks, Photonics West for holoOPTIX and AR, CES for various industries and technologies such as 5G networks, augmented reality, consumer electronics, automotive, and medical applications.

There was a minimal decrease in selling and marketing expenses in 2020 compared to 2019.

The increase in general and administrative expenses in 2021, compared to 2020, is primarily due to:

$5.0 million increase in legal and audit expenses, primarily resulting from costs associated with the Torchlight reverse acquisition ("RTO") and Nanotech acquisition, as well as costs associated with listing on the NASDAQ.
$6.2 million increase in consulting expenses primarily due to:
o
$4.1 million of expenses relating to the management of, and maintenance of the Oil and Gas assets ("O&G assets") acquired via the Torchlight RTO, including $3.1 million paid to consultants in the form of warrants as well as $0.9 million paid in cash.
o
$1.2 million in advisory fees relating to the acquisition of Nanotech.
$3.0 million increase in salaries and benefits primarily due to:
o
$2.0 million increase due to incurring an additional $1.1 million in salaries expense for general headcount expansion in 2021 as well as recording accrued bonuses of $0.9 million.
o
$0.9 million in salaries expenses in relation to management of, and maintenance of the O&G assets acquired via the Torchlight RTO.
$3.9 million increase in investor related expenses due to:
o
$2.7 million warrants and RSUs issued to non-employee consultants in 2021. The fair value of warrants was calculated based on the Monte Carlo simulation valuation technique. The fair value of RSUs was calculated using the grant date share price. Refer to note 14 in Item 8. "Financial Statements and supplementary data" for more details.
o
$1.0 million in other expenses in relation to stock market support, investor communication and holding an annual stockholders meeting.

25


$1.6 million increase in rent and utilities due to the new lease for the Years EndedCompany's Highfield Park facility in Nova Scotia, Canada, the expansion of the Pleasanton facility in California, the opening of new administrative locations in Boxborough, Massachusetts and Plano, Texas, and new research and development office in Athens, Greece.
$1.6 million increase in insurance costs due to the increased insurance requirements in the US resulting from the Company's NASDAQ listing.
$1.7 million increase in depreciation, amortization and impairment expense.

The increase in general and administrative expenses in 2020, compared to 2019, is primarily due to:

$1.1 million increase in legal and audit fees for work related to the preparation for the Torchlight RTO and the closing of the CPM RTO, $0.2 million increase in investment banking services, and $0.2 million increase in investor related expenses due to preparation for the acquisition of Torchlight.
$0.2 million increase in rent and utilities

The increase in research and development expenses in 2021, compared to 2020, is primarily due to:

$3.1 million increase in salaries and benefits due to general headcount expansion.
$1.1 million due to R&D materials purchases.
$0.6 million increase in IT & software, dues and subscriptions, rent & utilities as well as travel and entertainment expenses.

The increase in research and development expenses in 2020, compared to 2019, is primarily due to $0.3 million increase in consulting expenses.

Other expense

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Other expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

(1,106,445

)

 

 

(1,429,954

)

 

 

323,509

 

 

 

-23

%

 

 

(1,135,922

)

 

 

(294,032

)

 

 

26

%

Loss on foreign exchange, net

 

 

(205,882

)

 

 

(264,831

)

 

 

58,949

 

 

 

-22

%

 

 

(316,261

)

 

 

51,430

 

 

 

-16

%

Loss on financial instruments, net

 

 

(40,540,091

)

 

 

(844,993

)

 

 

(39,695,098

)

 

 

4698

%

 

 

(280,319

)

 

 

(564,674

)

 

 

201

%

Other (loss) income, net

 

 

(11,939,068

)

 

 

1,491,188

 

 

 

(13,430,256

)

 

 

-901

%

 

 

2,081,398

 

 

 

(590,210

)

 

 

-28

%

Total other expense

 

 

(53,791,486

)

 

 

(1,048,590

)

 

 

(52,742,896

)

 

 

5030

%

 

 

348,896

 

 

 

(1,397,486

)

 

 

-401

%

The $0.2 million decrease in interest expense in 2021 compared to 2020 was due to the settlement of certain of the Company's convertible promissory notes and debentures, converted into MMI common stock during the year ended December 31, 2021, resulting in less interest expense being incurred.

The $0.3 million increase in interest expense in 2020 compared to 2019 was due to a $5 million loan obtained from BDC and issued in April 2020 as well as issuance of $1 million in unsecured convertible debentures in the first half of fiscal year 2020.

The increase in loss on financial instruments in 2021, compared to 2020, was due to the re-measurement of convertible financial liabilities with carrying value of $12.0 million at the conversion dates and a recognition of a $40.2 million non-cash realized loss in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The increase in the fair value of convertible financial liabilities was due to the increase in the Company’s stock price from CA$0.66 as at December 31, 2020 to:

CA$3.01 at February 16, 2021 when the Company converted unsecured convertible promissory notes of $4.4 million principal and 2019interest at a share price of CA$0.50 in accordance with the terms of the bridge financing;
CA$3.01 at February 16, 2021 when the Company converted unsecured convertible debentures of $1.5 million principal and interest at share price of CA$0.70 as per terms of the agreement and;
CA$3.80 at March 3, 2021 when the Company converted secured convertible debentures of $4.3 million principal and interest at share price of CA$0.70 pursuant to the terms of the agreement with Business Development Canada.

26


Each of the above referenced promissory notes and debentures included a conversion feature, exercisable at the option of the debt holder. For accounting purposes, each of these conversion features was an embedded derivative in the note or debenture. The Company elected to account for fluctuations in (a) the value of the liabilities driven by interest rate volatility and the Company’s credit risk and (b) the embedded derivatives driven by fluctuations in the Company’s common stock share price, using the fair value option. This accounting method calls for the Company to measure the fair value of the convertible financial liabilities at each balance sheet date and to record any non-cash adjustments relating to instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income, and non-cash adjustments relating to other factors in the statements of operations. If, as was the case for the liabilities described above, the debt is converted, the valuations and any adjustments are to be recorded as of the date of such conversion.

The fair value option also provides that the total revaluation adjustment, in this case $40.2 million, be recorded in common stock and additional paid in capital along with the $10.2 million principal and interest portion, resulting in an increase to stockholders' equity despite the recording of the $40.2 million loss in the statement of operations.

The recorded loss is a non-cash expense. The creditors of the Company exchanged their secured and unsecured debt for common stock of the Company at conversion prices that were established at the time the instruments were created and, at which time, represented a conversion price close to or higher than the then market price of the common stock. Had the Company been permitted to pay off the debts in cash at the time of conversion, fewer shares would have been required to be issued and a lower loss would have been recorded. However, the instruments prevented any pre-payment of the debts by the Company. The conversions had the beneficial effect of significantly reducing the Company’s liabilities and eliminating broad-based security interests in all of the Company’s assets previously held by the creditors.

The $0.6 million increase in loss on financial instruments in 2020 compared to 2019 is primarily due to the re-measurement of convertible financial liabilities with carrying value of $12.0 million at the conversion dates and a recognition of a $0.8 million non-cash realized loss in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The $13.0 million decrease in net other income in 2021, compared to 2020, is primarily due to costs incurred in relation to certain drilling activity carried out by the company at its Oil and Gas ("O&G") properties, to remain in compliance with all aspects of the Company's lease obligations and to satisfy the Continuous Drilling Clause ("CDC") with University Lands. The Company was successful in maintaining lease compliance and is moving forward with the planned spin-out of the O&G assets.

The $0.6 million decrease in other income in 2020 compared to 2019 was primarily due to the following:

$0.4 million decrease in recognition of the fair value of the interest free component of the funding obligation.
$0.6 million decrease in recognition of fair value gain on the ACOA loans.
Offset by a $0.4 million increase in government assistance.

27


Deferred Tax recovery

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

%

 

Income tax recovery

 

 

852,063

 

 

 

193,710

 

 

 

658,353

 

 

 

340

%

 

 

83,549

 

 

 

110,161

 

 

 

132

%

The Company records deferred income tax liabilities for some of its foreign subsidiaries in Canada and United Kingdom. The increase in income tax recovery in 2021, compared to 2020, was driven by:

an increase in accumulated losses, as well as changes in foreign exchange rates, in the Company's foreign subsidiary in United Kingdom.
an increase in accumulated losses, intangibles amortization and changes in foreign exchange rates in Nanotech securities, the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, pursuant to its acquisition on October 5, 2021.

The increase in income tax recovery in 2020, compared to 2019, was driven by:

an increase in accumulated losses, as well as changes in foreign exchange rates, in the Company's foreign subsidiary in United Kingdom.

The Company has not yet been able to establish profitability or other sufficient significant positive evidence, to conclude that its deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized. Therefore, the Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not meet its financial obligations as they become due after use of currently available cash. The Company has a planning and budgeting process to monitor operating cash requirements, including amounts projected for capital expenditures, which are adjusted as input variables change. These variables include, but are not limited to, the ability of the Company to generate revenue from current and prospective customers, general and administrative requirements of the Company and the availability of equity or debt capital and government funding. As these variables change, the Company may be required to issue equity or obtain debt financing.

At December 31, 2021, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $46.6 million including $0.8 million in restricted cash compared to $1.4 million in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2020. In addition, and as of December 31, 2021, the Company holds short-term investments amounting to $2.8 million (December 31, 2020: $Nil).

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we had a2021, the Company’s principal sources of liquidity included $147 million of cash obtained through the Torchlight RTO, $14.0 million in cash obtained through convertible debt, $1.8 million in cash obtained through revenue and deferred revenue, and $1.1 million in cash obtained through long-term and short-term interest-free debt.

The Company’s primary uses of liquidity included the Nanotech acquisition of $66.1 million net loss of $12,781,896 comparedcash acquired, salaries of $10.3 million, legal and audit fees of $6.3 million, professional service fees of $11.0 million and, Oil and Gas drilling costs of $12.5 million.

The Company believes that its existing cash will be sufficient to a net lossmeet its working capital and capital expenditure needs as production capacity begins to come on line. The Company may need to raise additional capital to expand the commercialization of $9,839,396its products, fund its operations and further its research and development activities. Future capital requirements may vary materially from period to period and will depend on many factors, including the timing and extent of spending on research and development efforts, the capital expansion of its facilities in Halifax and California and the ongoing investments to support the growth of its business.

The Company also has the option to raise equity through issuing common stock of up to approximately $112.5 million under an existing At-The-Market equity program where the Company's shares have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-256632) filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 28, 2021, and declared effective on June 14, 2021 (the “Registration Statement”).

28


The following table summarizes META’s cash flows for the periods presented:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(34,764,911

)

 

 

(7,929,047

)

 

 

(4,360,747

)

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

 

65,144,545

 

 

 

2,412,991

 

 

 

(1,195,342

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

15,655,863

 

 

 

6,333,827

 

 

 

5,328,559

 

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

46,035,497

 

 

 

817,771

 

 

 

(227,530

)

Net cash used in operating activities

During the year ended December 31, 2019. The difference is2021, net cash used in operating activities of $36.2 million was primarily driven by a $91.0 million net loss reported for the year, and non-cash adjustments of $51.7 million mainly due to a decrease$40.5 million fair value losses on financial instruments, $8 million stock based compensation and non-cash consulting fees, $3.7 million in revenues, increased generaldepreciation, amortization and administrative expenses, an impairment, loss, a loss on saleand non-cash interest and accretion of oil$1.1 million, along with other less material line items. Change in operating assets and gas property and extinguishment of debt.liabilities totaled $3.2 million.

34

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - continued

Revenues and Cost of Revenues

ForDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, we had production revenuenet cash used in operating activities of $193,379 compared$7.9 million was primarily driven by $11.6 million of net loss reported for the year, and non-cash adjustments of $4.6 million mainly due to $746,263 of production revenue for$2.3 million in depreciation and amortization, $0.9 in fair value losses on financial instruments, $1.1 million in interest expense and $1.5 million in stock-based compensation. Change in operating assets and liabilities totaled $0.9 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2019. Refer to the table2019, net cash used in operating activities of production and revenue for 2020 and 2019 included below. Our cost$4.3 million was primarily driven by $8.4 million of revenue, consisting of lease operating expenses and production taxes, was $188,481, and $451,325net loss reported for the yearsyear, and non-cash adjustments of $3.3 million mainly due to $2.3 million in depreciation and amortization, $1.0 million in interest expense and $1.3 million in stock-based compensation net of $0.5 in non-cash finance income and $0.5 non-cash government assistance. Change in operating assets and liabilities totaled $0.8 million.

Net cash provided by investing activities

During the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The change in revenue2021, net cash provided by investing activities of $66.6 million was primarily impacteddriven by cash acquired as a result of the suspensionTorchlight RTO of production$147 million, offset by $66.1 million in cash paid for the Nanotech acquisition, $2.9 million purchase of short-term investments, $10.4 million in property plant and equipment purchases associated with the construction of the Highfield Park Facility as well as equipment purchases for both the Highfield Park and Pleasanton facilities, and a $0.9 million increase in intangibles as a result of capitalized legal cost for certain patents, as well as the acquisition of certain intellectual property assets from the Flying B #3 well in the Hazel Project in May 2019 and the sale of our Warwink Project in November 2020.Interglass Technology AG (Switzerland).

Production and Revenue are detailed as follows:

Property+A2:G124 Quarter Oil Production {BBLS} Gas Production {MCF} Oil Revenue  Gas Revenue  Total Revenue 
                
Oklahoma Q1 - 2020 181 468 $583  $1,000  $1,583 
Hazel (TX) Q1 - 2020 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
MECO (TX) Q1 - 2020 1,863 1,559 $81,530  $1,507  $83,037 
Total Q1-2020   2,044 2,027 $82,113  $2,507  $84,620 
                   
Oklahoma Q2 - 2020 28 448 $774  $156  $930 
Hazel (TX) Q2 - 2020 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
MECO (TX) Q2 - 2020 1,389 747 $44,223  $324  $44,547 
Total Q2-2020   1,417 1,195 $44,997  $480  $45,477 
                   
Oklahoma Q3 - 2020 69 1,096 $2,084  $494  $2,578 
Hazel (TX) Q3 - 2020 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
MECO (TX) Q3 - 2020 1,480 680 $57,774  $1,370  $59,144 
Total Q3-2020   1,549 1,776 $59,858  $1,864  $61,722 
                   
Oklahoma Q4 - 2020 0 0 $1,042  $773  $1,815 
Hazel (TX) Q4 - 2020 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
MECO (TX) Q4 - 2020 435 0 $9,837  $5,519  $15,356 
MECO (Sold 11/1/20) YTD ADJ 0 0 $(10,092) $(5,519) $(15,611)
Total Q4-2020   435 0 $787  $773  $1,560 
                   
2020 Year To Date   5,445 4,998 $187,755  $5,624  $193,379 
                   
                   
Oklahoma Q1 - 2019 56 1,072 $2,567  $2,333  $4,900 
Hazel (TX) Q1 - 2019 2,864 0 $131,901  $-  $131,901 
MECO (TX) Q1 - 2019 3,525 2,565 $167,677  $6,359  $174,036 
Total Q1-2019   6,445 3,637 $302,145  $8,692  $310,837 
                   
Oklahoma Q2 - 2019 43 1,770 $2,477  $2,450  $4,927 
Hazel (TX) Q2 - 2019 1,123 0 $64,302  $-  $64,302 
Meco (TX) Q2 - 2019 2,585 2,623 $156,259  $11,587  $167,846 
Total Q2-2019   3,751 4,393 $223,038  $14,037  $237,075 
                   
Oklahoma Q3 - 2019 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
Hazel (TX) Q3 - 2019 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
Meco (TX) Q3 - 2019 1,320 4,522 $71,064  $78  $71,142 
Total Q3-2019   1,320 4,522 $71,064  $78  $71,142 
                   
Oklahoma Q4 - 2019 166 3,766 $8,873  $1,895  $10,768 
Hazel (TX) Q4 - 2019 0 0 $-  $-  $- 
Meco (TX) Q4 - 2019 2,102 5,890 $110,894  $5,547  $116,441 
Total Q4-2019   2,268 9,656 $119,767  $7,442  $127,209 
                   
2019 Year To Date   13,784 22,208 $716,014  $30,249  $746,263 

35

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS- continued

We recorded depreciation, depletion and amortization expense of $820,441 forDuring the year ended December 31, 2020, comparednet cash provided by investing activities of $2.4 million was primarily driven by proceeds from the CPM RTO of $3.1 million offset by $0.7 million in equipment purchases and capitalized legal costs to $4,393,160 for 2019. Impairment expense recognized was $2,108,301 in 2020 compared to $1,494,769 for 2019. An impairment of unevaluated costs of $756,964 was recorded atobtain certain patents.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, which became an additionnet cash used in investing activities of $1.2 million was driven by equipment purchases and capitalized legal costs to the basis for future depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense for 2020.obtain certain patents.

 

29


General and Administrative Expenses

Net cash provided by financing activities

Our general and administrative expenses forDuring the yearsyear ended December 31, 20202021, net cash provided by financing activities of $15.5 million was primarily driven by $10.0 million in proceeds received from the issuance of unsecured convertible promissory notes to Torchlight, subsequently eliminated upon consolidation at December 31, 2021, $3.9 million in proceeds from the issuance of unsecured convertible promissory notes to an affiliate that was subsequently converted into common stock during the year and 2019 were $3,526,700$1.4 million in proceeds from options and $3,273,697, respectively, an increase of $253,003. Our general and administrative expenses consisted of consulting and compensation expense, substantially all of which were non-cash or deferred, accounting and administrative costs, professional consulting fees, and other general corporate expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses forwarrants exercise.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, comparednet cash provided by financing activities of $6.3 million was primarily driven by $3.6 million in proceeds received from the issuance of secured convertible debentures to 2019 is detailed as follows:BDC Capital that was subsequently converted into common stock in 2021, $0.7 million in proceeds from issuance of unsecured convertible debentures and $0.6 million in proceeds from the issuance of convertible promissory notes to a shareholder that were subsequently converted into common stock in 2021, $0.6 million in proceeds from common stock and warrants issuances offset by $0.2 million in repayments of long-term debt.

Increase(decrease) in non cash stock and warrant compensation $(537,572)
Increase(decrease) in consulting expense  (132,512)
Increase(decrease) in professional fees  (85,729)
Increase(decrease) in investor relations  148,814 
Increase(decrease) in travel expense  (37,560)
Increase(decrease) in salaries and compensation  131,920 
Increase(decrease) in legal fees  662,121 
Increase(decrease) in insurance  85,501 
Increase(decrease) in rent  (17,175)
Increase(decrease) in accounting and audit fees  8,557 
Increase(decrease) in general corporate expenses  26,638 
     
Total Increase in General and Administrative Expenses $253,003 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we had a net loss of $12,781,896 compared to a net loss of $9,839,396 for the year ended December 31, 2019.

At December 31, 2020, we had current assets of $521,574 and total assets of $32,396,904. As of December 31, 2020, we had current liabilities of $2,897,083. Stockholders’ equity was $12,643,418 at December 31, 2020.

Cash from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2020, was $(1,345,273) compared to $(141,933) forDuring the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $1,203,340. Cash from operating activities during 2020 can be attributed principally to net loss from operations of $12,781,896 adjusted for noncash stock based compensation of $404,900, for $820,441 in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, for $1,999,866 in loss on extinguishment of debt, for $2,928,276 in loss from sale of oil and gas property and $2,108,301 in impairment expense.

Cash used in operating activities during 2019 can be attributed principally to net losses from operations of $9,839,396 adjusted for noncash stock-based compensation of $942,470, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense of $4,393,160, and impairment expense of $1,494,769.

Cash used in investing activities for year ended December 31, 2020 was $5,804,023 compared to $8,790,222 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of investments in oil and gas properties during the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

36

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS- continued

Cash from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $7,190,893 as compared to $8,181,722 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Cash from financing activities in 2020 and 2019 consisted primarily of proceeds from common stock issuances and debt financing. We expect to continue to have cash provided by financing activities as we seek new rounds of financing$5.3 million was primarily driven by $2.4 million in proceeds received from the issuance of secured convertible promissory notes, $0.6 million in proceeds from issuance of unsecured convertible debentures and continue to develop our oil and gas investments. Reference Note 11 to the Financial Statements regarding additional funding closed subsequent to December 31, 2020.$0.8 million in proceeds from a private placement, $0.7 million in proceeds from long-term debt.

 

Our currentCRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. These estimates, judgments and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable at that time, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are insufficientnot readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates. The accounting policies that reflect the Company's more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which it believes are the most critical to satisfyaid in fully understanding and evaluating our cash needs overreported financial results include the next twelve months and as such we will require additional debt or equity financing to meet our plans and needs. We face obstacles in continuing to attract new financing due to our history and current record of net losses and past working capital deficits. Despite our efforts, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to obtain the financing required to meet our stated objectives or even to continue as a going concern.following:

 

We do not expectRevenue recognition – The Company’s revenue is generated from product sales as well as development revenue. The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies performance obligations under the terms of its contracts, and control of its products is transferred to pay cash dividends on our common stockits customers in an amount that reflects the foreseeable future.consideration the Company expects to receive from its customers in exchange for those products or services.

 

Critical Accounting PoliciesRevenue from the sale of prototypes and Estimatesfinished products is recognized at the point in time when control of the asset is transferred to the customer, generally on delivery of goods. The Company considers whether there are other obligations in the contract that are separate performance obligations to which a portion of the transaction price needs to be allocated. In determining the transaction price for the sale of prototypes, the Company considers the effects of variable consideration, the existence of significant financial components, non-cash consideration and consideration payable to the customer (if any).

 

Oil and gas properties – The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for exploration andRevenue from development activities as defined byis recognized over time, using an input method to measure progress towards complete satisfaction of the Securitiesresearch activities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Under this method of accounting, the costs of unsuccessful, as well as successful, exploration and development activities are capitalized as properties and equipment. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to property acquisition, exploration and development activities but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas properties is not recognized, unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves.associated performance obligations identified within each contract have been satisfied.

 

Oil and gas properties include costs that are excluded from costs being depleted or amortized. Oil and natural gas property costs excluded represent investmentsGoodwill- Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in unevaluated properties and include non-producing leasehold, geological, and geophysical costs associated with leasehold or drilling interests and exploration drilling costs. The Company allocates a portion of its acquisition costs to unevaluated properties based on relative value. Costs are transferred to the full cost pool as the properties are evaluatedbusiness combination over the lifefair value of the reservoir. Unevaluated properties arenet tangible and

intangible assets acquired. The carrying amount of goodwill is periodically reviewed for impairment at least annually and are determined through an evaluation considering, among other factors, seismic data, requirements to relinquish acreage, drilling results, remaining time in the commitment period, remaining capital plan, and political, economic, and market conditions.(at a minimum annually)

and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of this asset may not be recoverable.

Gains and losses on the sale of oil and gas properties are not generally reflected in income unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. Sales of less than 100% of the Company’s interest in the oil and gas property are treated as a reduction of the capital cost of the field, with no gain or loss recognized, as long as doing so does not significantly affect the unit-of-production depletion rate. Costs of retired equipment, net of salvage value, are usually charged to accumulated depreciation.

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization – The depreciable base for oil and natural gas properties includes the sum of all capitalized costs net of accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization (“DD&A”), estimated future development costs and asset retirement costs not included in oil and natural gas properties, less costs excluded from amortization. The depreciable base of oil and natural gas properties is amortized on a unit-of-production method.

Ceiling test – Future production volumes from oil and gas properties are a significant factor in determining the full cost ceiling limitation of capitalized costs. Under the full cost method of accounting, the Company is required to periodically perform a “ceiling test” that determines a limit on the book value of oil and gas properties. If the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas properties, net of related deferred income taxes, plus the cost of unproved oil and gas properties, exceeds the present value of estimated future net cash flows discounted at 10 percent, net of related tax affects, plus the cost of unproved oil and gas properties, the excess is charged to expense and reflected as additional accumulated DD&A. The ceiling test calculation uses a commodity price assumption which is based on the unweighted arithmetic average of the price on the first day of each month for each month within the prior 12-month period and excludes future cash outflows related to estimated abandonment costs.

The determination of oil and gas reserves isCompany first performs a subjective process, andqualitative assessment to test the accuracy of any reserve estimate dependsreporting unit's goodwill for impairment. Based on the quality of available data and the application of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Estimates of economically recoverable reserves and future net cash flows depend on a number of variable factors and assumptions that are difficult to predict and may vary considerably from actual results. In particular, reserve estimates for wells with limited or no production history are less reliable than those based on actual production. Subsequent re-evaluation of reserves and cost estimates related to future development of proved oil and gas reserves could result in significant revisions to proved reserves. Other issues, such as changes in regulatory requirements, technological advances, and other factors which are difficult to predict could also affect estimates of proved reserves in the future.qualitative

Asset retirement obligations – Theassessment, if it is determined that the fair value of our reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e. a liability for an asset’s retirement obligation (“ARO”) is recognized inlikelihood of more than 50

percent) to be less than its carrying amount, the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, with the corresponding charge capitalized as partquantitative assessment of the carrying amount ofimpairment test is performed. In the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then-present value each subsequent period, andquantitative assessment, the capitalized cost is depleted over the useful life of the related asset. Abandonment costs incurred are recorded as a reduction of the ARO liability.

37

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS- continued

Inherent inCompany compares the fair value calculation of an ARO are numerous assumptions and judgments including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental, and political environments. To the extent future revisionsour reporting unit to these assumptions impactits carrying value. If the fair value of the existing ARO liability,reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and the Company is not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference, but not exceeding the total carrying value of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit, would be recorded.

30


Acquired intangibles - In accordance with ASC 805 Business Combinations, the Company allocates the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Such valuations may require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Acquired intangible assets consist of acquired technology and customer relationships. In valuing acquired intangible assets, the Company makes assumptions and estimates based in part on projected financial information, which makes assumptions and estimates inherently uncertain, particularly for early-stage technology companies. The significant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value of acquired intangible technology assets include the revenue growth rate, the royalty rate and the discount rate. The significant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value of acquired customer contract intangible assets include the revenue growth rate and the discount rate.

As a result of the judgments that need to be made, the Company obtains the assistance of independent valuation firms. The Company completes these assessments as soon as practical after the closing dates. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

Although the Company believes the assumptions and estimates of fair value it has made in the past have been reasonable and appropriate, they are based in part on historical experience and information obtained from the management of the acquired companies and are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. Unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that may affect the accuracy or validity of such assumptions, estimates or actual results. As a result, during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding adjustmentoffset to goodwill, if the changes are related to conditions that existed at the time of the acquisition. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period or final determination of the values of assets acquired or liabilities assumed, whichever comes first, any subsequent adjustments, based on events that occurred subsequent to the acquisition date, are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Business combinations - The Company allocates the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is maderecorded as goodwill to reporting units based on the expected benefit from the business combination. Allocation of purchase consideration to identifiable assets and liabilities affects the amortization expense, as acquired finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the useful life, whereas any indefinite-lived intangible assets, including goodwill, are not amortized. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from business combinations and are expensed as incurred.

31


Assets held for sale – The Company determines the fair market value of the oil and gas property balance. Settlements greater than or less than amounts accrued as ARO are recorded asassets held for sale on a gain or loss upon settlement.

Share-based compensation – Compensation cost for equity awards is based onperiodic basis using inputs from a third party valuation firm skilled in the valuation of this class of assets. The Company estimated the fair value of the equity instrumentOrogrande property at June 28, 2021 as the sum of the median of each of a range of fair values of identified drilling locations determined using numerous assumptions including the number of drilling locations, forecasted production volumes per drilling location, fair value per barrel of forecasted production volumes based on comparable transactions or entities with acreage proximal to the Orogrande Project property, and applying a drilling location risk factor (collectively, “drilling location assumptions”); and a range of fair values of the undeveloped land acreage determined using numerous assumptions including the number of undeveloped land acres, fair value per acre for comparable transactions or entities with acreage proximal to the Orogrande Project property, and applying an acreage risk factor (collectively, “undeveloped land assumptions”). The Company estimated the fair value of the Hazel Property at June 28, 2021 using a discounted cash flow model. The significant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value of the Hazel Project property at acquisition date included forecasted production volumes, forecasted commodity prices, and the discount rate. The Company estimated the fair value of the O&G assets at December 31, 2021 by obtaining a valuation study performed by a third party valuation firm. The estimates involved are consistent with those outlined above for the June 28, 2021 valuation estimate.

Commitments and contractual obligations

For a description of the Company’s commitments and contractual obligations, please see “Note 28 – Commitments and contingencies” as well as “Note 27 – Leases” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K.

Off-balance sheet arrangements

Off-balance sheet firm commitments relating to outstanding letters of credit amounted to approximately $1.1 million as of December 31, 2021. These letters of credit and bank guarantees are collateralized by $0.8 million in restricted cash. Please see “Note 27 – Commitments and contingencies” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K. The Company does not maintain any other off-balance sheet arrangements.

Recent accounting pronouncements

For a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on the dateCompany’s Consolidated Financial Statements, please see “Note 2 – Significant accounting policies” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of grantthis Form 10-K.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk is recognized over the period during which an employeerisk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. Interest rate risk is requiredminimized through management’s decision to provide serviceprimarily obtain fixed rate or interest-free debt. The Company’s funding obligation and long-term debt have been obtained at a nil interest rate and the interest on the cash balances is insignificant. As a result, the Company is not exposed to material cash flow interest rate risk.

Foreign currency risk

Foreign currency risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from changes in foreign exchange forrates. The Company has transactional currency exposures that arise from loans and receivables as well as purchases in currencies other than their functional currency such as Canadian Dollars, Euros and Great Britain Pounds. Current exposure is not material at this time, as exchange rate impacts occur with a reasonable timeline of the award.decision to make the expenditure. As a result, the Company does not enter into derivatives to hedge the exposure.

In the future, a hedging strategy may be enacted if long term contracts or operational cash flows create a requirement.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

The Company accounts for stock option awards using the calculated value method. The expected term was derived using the simplified method provided in Securities and Exchange Commission release Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110, which averages an awards weighted average vesting period and contractual term for “plain vanilla” share options.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – (KPMG LLP, Vaughan, ON, Canada, Auditor Firm ID: 85)

33

Consolidated Balance Sheets

37

Consolidated Statements of Operations

38

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

39

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

40

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

41

 

The Company accounts for any forfeitures32


Report of options when they occur. Previously recognized compensation cost for an award is reversed in the period that the award is forfeited.

The Company also issues equity awards to non-employees. The fair value of these option awards is estimated when the award recipient completes the contracted professional services. The Company recognizes expense for the estimated total value of the awards during the period from their issuance until performance completion.

The Company values warrant and option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company is subject to a sublease agreement through October 31, 2021 for occupancy of its office premises which requires monthly rent payments of $3,512.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had interests in three oil and gas projects: the Orogrande Project in Hudspeth County, Texas, the Hazel Project in Sterling, Tom Green, and Irion Counties, Texas, and Hunton wells in Central Oklahoma.

See the description under “Current Projects” below under Note 4, “Oil & Gas Properties,” of the financial statements included with this report for information and disclosure regarding these projects, which description is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not Applicable.

38

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc

Meta Materials Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Torchlight Energy Resources, IncMeta Materials Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20202021 and 2019, and2020, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years thenin the three‑year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively, referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20202021 and 2019,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years thenin the three‑year period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States of America.accounting principles.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidatedWe also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial statements have been prepared assuming thatreporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 toCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the consolidatedTreadway Commission, and our report dated March 1, 2022 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses from its operations, has negative working capital, and a significant accumulated deficit, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sthese consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

39

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that waswere communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i)that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii)(2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit mattermatters below, providing a separate opinionopinions on the critical audit mattermatters or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.they relate.

Depletion and ImpairmentAcquisition date fair value of Oil and Gas Properties

a developed nanotechnology intangible asset in the acquisition of Nanotech Security Corp.

As describeddiscussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, depletion,on October 5, 2021, the Company acquired Nanotech Security Corp. for $72.1 million. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The Company measured the assets acquired and impairmentliabilities assumed at fair value, which resulted in the recognition of proved oil and gas properties involve judgments and estimates relateda developed nanotechnology intangible asset of $14.8 million. As discussed in Note 2 to the Company’s oilconsolidated financial statements, the significant estimates and gas reserve quantities and associated future net cash flows. In addition, impairment assessment of unevaluated oil and gas properties involvesassumptions used by the consideration of factors that include, among others, seismic data, requirements to relinquish acreage, drilling results, remaining timeCompany in the commitment period,determination of the fair value of acquired intangible technology assets include the revenue growth rate, the royalty rate, and remaining capital plan. the discount rate.

We identified depletion and impairmentthe evaluation of oil and gas propertiesthe acquisition date fair value of the developed nanotechnology intangible asset in the acquisition of Nanotech Security Corp. as a critical audit matter.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to depletion Specifically, the assessment of the revenue growth rate, royalty rate, and impairment of oil and gas properties is a critical audit matter arediscount rate assumptions used in estimating the presence of significant judgment by management, including the use of management’s specialists, when developing the estimates of proved oil and gas reserves and in assessing the impairment of unevaluated oil and gas properties, which in turn, led toacquisition date fair value involved a high degree of subjective auditor judgment, effort,judgment. In addition, the estimated fair value was sensitive to possible changes to the above estimates and subjectivity in performing procedures to evaluate management’s estimated future cash flows and significant assumptions, and testing the completeness and accuracy of lease records, including leasehold expiration and evaluating plans to develop certain properties.assumptions.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the revenue growth rate by comparing to historical results for the acquired entity and publicly available market data. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

evaluating the Company’s discount rate assumption, by comparing it against a discount rate range that was independently developed using publicly available market data for comparable entities

33


evaluating the discount rate applied to the developed nanotechnology intangible asset by comparing it to the weighted average return on assets acquired in the Nanotech Security Corp. business combination and the internal rate of return of the Nanotech Security Corp. business combination
evaluating the Company’s royalty rate assumption, by comparing the selected royalty rate to ranges of royalty rates observed in comparable royalty agreements.

Fair value of the Orogrande Project property and preferred stock liability

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidenceAs discussed in connection with forming our overall opinion onNote 3 to the consolidated financial statements. These proceduresstatements, the Company completed a reverse acquisition of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. on June 28, 2021. The assets acquired included among others, understanding the design of controls relating to depletion and the impairment assessment ofcertain oil and natural gas properties with a fair value of $72.6 million, of which $71.1 million of the fair value related to the Orogrande Project property. The liabilities assumed included a preferred stock liability with a fair value of $72.6 million entitling the preferred stock owners to the net proceeds of the sale or spinout of the oil and natural gas properties. As a result, the fair value measurement of the oil and natural gas properties, including the Orogrande Project property, also forms the basis for the fair value measurement of the preferred stock liability as of June 28, 2021 and as of December 31, 2021. The Company engaged an independent valuation firm to assist in the determination of the fair value of the Orogrande Project property as of June 28, 2021 and December 31, 2021. The estimated fair value of the Orogrande Project property was calculated as the sum of the median of each of:

a range of fair values of identified drilling locations determined using numerous assumptions including the number of drilling locations, forecasted production volumes per drilling location, fair value per barrel of forecasted production volumes based on comparable transactions or entities with acreage proximal to the Orogrande Project property, and applying a drilling location risk factor (collectively, “drilling location assumptions”); and
a range of fair values of the undeveloped land acreage determined using numerous assumptions including the number of undeveloped land acres, fair value per acre for comparable transactions or entities with acreage proximal to the Orogrande Project property, and applying an acreage risk factor (collectively, “undeveloped land assumptions”).

We identified the evaluation of the acquisition-date and year-end fair value of the Orogrande Project property as a critical audit matter. A high degree of subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the drilling location and undeveloped land assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the Orogrande Project property. Minor changes to these assumptions could have had a significant effect on the estimate of fair value of the Orogrande Project property. Additionally, the audit effort associated with this estimate required specialized skills and knowledge.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the independent valuation firm engaged by the Company. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

evaluating the completeness and accuracy of ownership records, including inputs of interest and net revenue interests, testing the Company’s depletion calculations, evaluating the key inputs and significant assumptions used in the Company’s impairment analysis of oil and gas properties, and understanding the specialists’ qualifications and objectivity, as well as the methods and assumptionsmethodology used by the specialists.independent valuation firm to calculate the estimated fair value of the Orogrande Project property, including the determination of the number of drilling locations, forecasted production volumes per drilling location, drilling location risk factors, number of undeveloped land acres, and acreage risk factor

evaluating the Company’s determination of fair value per barrel of forecasted production volumes and fair value per acre by comparing to publicly available market data for comparable transactions or entities with acreage proximal to the Orogrande Project property.

/s/ Briggs & Veselka Co.KPMG LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 20162019.

Vaughan, Canada

March 1, 2022

 

Houston Texas34


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Meta Materials Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Meta Material Inc.’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses, described below, on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated March 1, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Material weaknesses related to the following have been identified and included in management’s assessment:

An ineffective control environment resulting from a lack of the required number of trained financial reporting, accounting, information technology (IT) and operational personnel with the appropriate skills and knowledge of GAAP and with assigned responsibility and accountability related to the design, implementation, and operation of internal control over financial reporting.
The insufficient number of personnel described above contributed to an ineffective risk assessment process necessary to identify all relevant risks of material misstatement and to evaluate the implications of relevant risks on its internal control over financial reporting.
An ineffective information and communication process resulting from: (i) insufficient communication of internal control information, including objectives and responsibilities, such as delegation of authority; and (ii) ineffective general IT controls and ineffective controls over information from service organizations, resulting in insufficient controls to ensure the relevance, timeliness and quality of information used in control activities.
As a consequence of the above, the Company had ineffective control activities related to the design, implementation and operations of process level and financial statement close controls which had a pervasive impact on the Company's internal control over financial reporting. In addition, process-level automated control activities and manual control activities that are dependent upon information derived from IT systems were also ineffective.
An ineffective monitoring process resulting from the evaluation and communication of internal control deficiencies, including monitoring corrective actions, not being performed in a timely manner.

The material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2021 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on those consolidated financial statements.

The Company acquired Nanotech Security Corp. during the year ended December 31, 2021, and management excluded Nanotech Security Corp. from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, Nanotech Security Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting associated with 17% of total assets and 45% of total revenues included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Nanotech Security Corp.

 

35


Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Form 10-K Item 9A under the header “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

Vaughan, Canada

March 18, 20211, 2022

40

36

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.


PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

META MATERIALS INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

46,645,704

 

 

$

1,395,683

 

Restricted cash

 

 

788,768

 

 

 

 

Short-term investments

 

 

2,875,638

 

 

 

 

Grants receivable

 

 

175,780

 

 

 

327,868

 

Accounts and other receivables

 

 

1,665,700

 

 

 

22,833

 

Inventory

 

 

265,718

 

 

 

463,382

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

3,451,367

 

 

 

514,203

 

Assets held for sale

 

 

75,500,000

 

 

 

 

Due from related parties

 

 

10,657

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

 

131,379,332

 

 

 

2,723,969

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

28,971,824

 

 

 

4,476,614

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

27,018,114

 

 

 

2,761,171

 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

 

6,278,547

 

 

 

270,581

 

Goodwill

 

 

240,376,634

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

434,024,451

 

 

$

10,232,335

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and other payables

 

$

13,335,470

 

 

$

2,940,452

 

Due to related party

 

 

 

 

 

245,467

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

491,278

 

 

 

290,544

 

Current portion of deferred revenues

 

 

779,732

 

 

 

1,239,927

 

Current portion of deferred government assistance

 

 

846,612

 

 

 

779,578

 

Preferred stock liability

 

 

75,500,000

 

 

 

 

Current portion of operating lease liabilities

 

 

663,861

 

 

 

150,802

 

Asset retirement obligations

 

 

21,937

 

 

 

 

Unsecured convertible promissory notes

 

 

 

 

 

1,203,235

 

Secured convertible debentures

 

 

 

 

 

5,545,470

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

91,638,890

 

 

 

12,395,475

 

Deferred revenues

 

 

637,008

 

 

 

804,143

 

Deferred government assistance

 

 

3,038

 

 

 

146,510

 

Deferred tax liability

 

 

324,479

 

 

 

318,054

 

Unsecured convertible debentures

 

 

 

 

 

1,825,389

 

Long-term operating lease liabilities

 

 

3,706,774

 

 

 

119,779

 

Funding obligation

 

 

268,976

 

 

 

776,884

 

Long-term debt

 

 

2,737,171

 

 

 

2,743,504

 

Total liabilities

 

 

99,316,336

 

 

 

19,129,738

 

Stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock - $0.001 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 284,573,316 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021, and $Nil par value; unlimited shares authorized, 154,163,975 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020

 

 

262,751

 

 

 

132,347

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

463,136,404

 

 

 

29,022,977

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(296,936

)

 

 

(655,884

)

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(128,394,104

)

 

 

(37,396,843

)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

334,708,115

 

 

 

(8,897,403

)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

434,024,451

 

 

$

10,232,335

 

Commitments and contingencies (note 28)

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2020  2019 
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash $131,327  $89,730 
Accounts receivable  137,801   137,769 
Accounts receivable, related party  92,320   61,693 
Production revenue receivable  21,182   100,546 
Subscription receivable  -   250,000 
Prepayments - development costs  35,272   - 
Prepaid expenses  103,672   96,006 
Total current assets  521,574   735,744 
         
Oil and gas properties, net  30,857,959   40,182,043 
Convertible note receivable  1,012,822   - 
Office equipment, net  4,549   6,348 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $32,396,904  $40,924,135 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $1,026,950  $1,444,002 
12% 2020 Unsecured promissory notes, net of  $-0- and $127,170
discount and financing costs, respectively
  -   8,437,127 
10% 2020 Convertible promissory notes payable  -   540,000 
14% 2021 Convertible promissory notes payable  -   2,000,000 
Accrued payroll  1,213,779   996,176 
Related party payables  98,805   45,000 
Due to working interest owners  54,320   54,320 
Accrued interest payable  503,229   445,861 
Total current liabilities  2,897,083   13,962,486 
         
12% 2021 Secured convertible promissory notes, net of $69,179
and $59,297 discount and financing costs, respectively
  12,430,821   3,940,703 
8% 2021 Convertible promissory notes payable, net of $505,957 and
$1,186,029 discount and BCF, respectively
  1,454,043   773,971 
6% 2021 Secured convertible promissory note due to related party  1,600,000   - 
14% 2021 Convertible promissory notes payable, net of $10,862
financing costs
  989,138   - 
Convertible notes payable and accrued interest  -   7,157,260 
PPP note payable  77,477   - 
Interest payable, net of current portion  283,080     
Asset retirement obligations  21,844   23,319 
Total liabilities  19,753,486   25,857,739 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, par value $0.001, 10,000,000 shares authorized; -0- issued and outstanding December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019  -   - 
Common stock, par value $0.001; 150,000,000 shares authorized;
103,273,264 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020;
76,222,042 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019
  103,276   76,225 
Additional paid-in capital  124,475,739   114,143,872 
Accumulated deficit  (111,935,597)  (99,153,701)
Total stockholders’ equity  12,643,418   15,066,396 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $32,396,904  $40,924,135 

Subsequent events (note 29)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

41

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  Year  Year 
  Ended  Ended 
  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
       
Oil and gas sales $193,379  $746,263 
         
Cost of revenues  (188,481)  (451,325)
         
Gross profit  4,898   294,938 
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative  3,526,700   3,273,697 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  820,441   4,393,160 
Loss on sale of oil and gas property  2,928,276   - 
Impairment loss  2,108,301   1,494,769 
Total operating expenses  9,383,718   9,161,626 
         
Other income (expense)        
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (1,999,866)  - 
Debt conversion expense  (176,400)  - 
Interest expense and accretion of note discounts  (1,239,532)  (968,292)
Franchise tax  (100)  (4,441)
Interest income  12,822   25 
Total expense, net  (3,403,076)  (972,708)
         
Loss before income taxes  (12,781,896)  (9,839,396)
         
Provision for income taxes  -   - 
         
Net loss $(12,781,896) $(9,839,396)
         
Loss per common share:        
Basic and Diluted $(0.14) $(0.14)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:        
Basic and Diluted  90,721,599   72,857,079 

statements

37


META MATERIALS INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product sales

 

$

407,915

 

 

$

2,905

 

 

$

23,745

 

Development revenue

 

 

3,674,602

 

 

 

1,119,278

 

 

 

878,665

 

Total revenue

 

 

4,082,517

 

 

 

1,122,183

 

 

 

902,410

 

Cost of goods sold

 

 

675,973

 

 

 

3,254

 

 

 

9,172

 

Gross profit

 

 

3,406,544

 

 

 

1,118,929

 

 

 

893,238

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling & marketing

 

 

2,267,354

 

 

 

1,064,659

 

 

 

1,125,719

 

General & administrative

 

 

29,699,601

 

 

 

6,707,858

 

 

 

4,819,737

 

Research & development

 

 

9,497,427

 

 

 

4,102,791

 

 

 

3,825,194

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

41,464,382

 

 

 

11,875,308

 

 

 

9,770,650

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(38,057,838

)

 

 

(10,756,379

)

 

 

(8,877,412

)

Interest expense, net

 

 

(1,106,445

)

 

 

(1,429,954

)

 

 

(1,135,922

)

Loss on foreign exchange, net

 

 

(205,882

)

 

 

(264,831

)

 

 

(316,261

)

Loss on financial instruments, net

 

 

(40,540,091

)

 

 

(844,993

)

 

 

(280,319

)

Other (loss) income, net

 

 

(11,939,068

)

 

 

1,491,188

 

 

 

2,081,398

 

Total other expense, net

 

 

(53,791,486

)

 

 

(1,048,590

)

 

 

348,896

 

Loss before income taxes

 

 

(91,849,324

)

 

 

(11,804,969

)

 

 

(8,528,516

)

Income tax recovery

 

 

852,063

 

 

 

193,710

 

 

 

83,549

 

Net loss

 

$

(90,997,261

)

 

$

(11,611,259

)

 

$

(8,444,967

)

Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

 

 

(321,230

)

 

 

88,173

 

 

 

81,432

 

Fair value gain (loss) on changes of own credit risk

 

 

680,178

 

 

 

(680,178

)

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

358,948

 

 

 

(592,005

)

 

 

81,432

 

Comprehensive loss

 

$

(90,638,313

)

 

$

(12,203,264

)

 

$

81,432

 

Basic and diluted loss per share (1)

 

$

(0.39

)

 

$

(0.08

)

 

$

(0.17

)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic and
   diluted
(1)

 

 

232,898,398

 

 

 

137,258,259

 

 

 

50,015,137

 

(2) Retroactively restated for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 for the Torchlight reverse acquisition (“Torchlight RTO”) and CPM reverse recapitalization (“CPM RTO”)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.statements

4238


 

META MATERIALS INC.

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

  Common  Common  Additional       
  stock  stock  paid-in  Accumulated    
  shares  amount  capital  deficit  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2018  70,112,376  $70,116  $107,266,965  $(89,314,305) $18,022,776 
                     
Issuance of common stock for services  312,593   312   365,088   -   365,400 
Issuance of common stock for cash less Underwriting/Offering Costs  4,696,100   4,696   3,442,184   -   3,446,880 
Issuance of common stock for subscription  416,667   417   249,583   -   250,000 
Issuance of common stock for interest  167,845   169   183,545   -   183,714 
Issuance of common stock for payment in kind on note payable  202,316   202   313,906   -   314,108 
Issuance of common stock for oil and  gas lease extension  100,000   100   124,900   -   125,000 
Beneficial conversion feature on  convertible notes  -   -   1,145,546   -   1,145,546 
Debt discount from fair value of warrants issued with convertible notes  -   -   240,455   -   240,455 
Issuance of common stock for convertible note conversion  45,455   45   49,955   -   50,000 
Warrant/Option exercise into common stock  168,690   168   184,675   -   184,843 
Warrants expense  -   -   340,570   -   340,570 
Option expense  -   -   236,500   -   236,500 
Net loss  -   -   -   (9,839,396)  (9,839,396)
                     
Balance, December 31, 2019  76,222,042  $76,225  $114,143,872  $(99,153,701) $15,066,396 
Issuance of common stock for services  317,857   318   161,432   -   161,750 
Issuance of common stock for cash less Underwriting/Offering Costs  16,787,625   16,788   5,324,027   -   5,340,815 
Issuance of common stock to a vendor for delay in payment  40,000   40   25,960   -   26,000 
Issuance of common stock for prepayment of development costs  1,630,434   1,630   748,370   -   750,000 
Issuance of common stock in connection with property sale  313,480   313   99,687   -   100,000 
Issuance of common stock for payment in kind on note payable  680,376   680   313,427   -   314,107 
Issuance of common stock for promissory note extension  40,000   40   15,960   -   16,000 
Issuance of common stock in payment of accounts payable and accrued liabilities  357,143   357   134,643   -   135,000 
Issuance of common stock for convertible note conversion  3,726,412   3,727   1,662,869   -   1,666,596 
Warrants issued in connection with public and private common stock  -   -   1,072,600   -   1,072,600 
Warrant/Option exercise into common stock  3,157,895   3,158   (3,158)  -   - 
Warrants issued in conversion of notes payable  -   -   382,500   -   382,500 
Debt conversion expense  -   -   176,400   -   176,400 
Warrants expense  -   -   148,900   -   148,900 
Option expense  -   -   68,250   -   68,250 
Net loss  -   -   -   (12,781,896)  (12,781,896)
                     
Balance, December 31, 2020  103,273,264  $103,276  $124,475,739  $(111,935,597) $12,643,418 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Preferred Stock

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

Paid-in

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Income (loss)

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Equity

 

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

 

58,153,368

 

 

$

58,153

 

 

 

49,339,552

 

 

$

27,522

 

 

$

17,270,864

 

 

$

(145,311

)

 

$

(17,340,617

)

 

$

(129,389

)

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,444,967

)

 

 

(8,444,967

)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

81,432

 

 

 

 

 

 

81,432

 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,027,283

 

 

 

3,027

 

 

 

636,975

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

640,002

 

Issuance of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

125,877

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

125,877

 

Conversion of deferred share units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

776,283

 

 

 

776

 

 

 

(776

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

479,061

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

479,061

 

Other stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

154,450

 

 

 

155

 

 

 

1,385,613

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,385,768

 

Balance, December 31, 2019

 

 

58,153,368

 

 

$

58,153

 

 

 

53,297,568

 

 

$

31,480

 

 

$

19,897,614

 

 

$

(63,879

)

 

$

(25,785,584

)

 

$

(5,862,216

)

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11,611,259

)

 

 

(11,611,259

)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(592,005

)

 

 

 

 

 

(592,005

)

Issuance of common stock, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,613,321

 

 

 

2,613

 

 

 

445,939

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

448,552

 

Issuance of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

149,994

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

149,994

 

Conversion of deferred share units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

522,596

 

 

 

523

 

 

 

(523

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of promissory notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,752,163

 

 

 

17,752

 

 

 

3,921,695

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,939,447

 

Conversion of preferred stock

 

 

(58,153,368

)

 

 

(58,153

)

 

 

58,153,368

 

 

 

58,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of reverse recapitalization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,599,223

 

 

 

21,599

 

 

 

3,192,903

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,214,502

 

Tax withheld on deferred share units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(72,717

)

 

 

(73

)

 

 

(18,669

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18,742

)

Other stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

298,453

 

 

 

300

 

 

 

1,434,024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,434,324

 

Balance, December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

154,163,975

 

 

$

132,347

 

 

$

29,022,977

 

 

$

(655,884

)

 

$

(37,396,843

)

 

$

(8,897,403

)

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(90,997,261

)

 

 

(90,997,261

)

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

358,948

 

 

 

 

 

 

358,948

 

Conversion of promissory notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,391,239

 

 

 

20,391

 

 

 

23,635,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,656,365

 

Conversion of secured debentures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,155,831

 

 

 

14,156

 

 

 

22,104,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,118,782

 

Conversion of unsecured debentures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,105,338

 

 

 

5,105

 

 

 

5,764,370

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,769,475

 

Conversion of long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

124,716

 

 

 

125

 

 

 

221,718

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

221,843

 

Conversion of payable to related party

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

150,522

 

 

 

151

 

 

 

225,835

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

225,986

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,786,927

 

 

 

4,787

 

 

 

1,288,476

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,293,263

 

Exercise of warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

361,729

 

 

 

362

 

 

 

122,108

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

122,470

 

Exercise of broker warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82,494

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

16,173

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,256

 

Effect of reverse acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

82,813,994

 

 

 

82,814

 

 

 

369,378,596

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

369,461,410

 

Shares issued in lieu of operating lease liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,832,989

 

 

 

1,833

 

 

 

2,780,135

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,781,968

 

Other stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

603,562

 

 

 

597

 

 

 

8,575,416

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,576,013

 

Balance, December 31, 2021

 

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

284,573,316

 

 

$

262,751

 

 

$

463,136,404

 

 

$

(296,936

)

 

$

(128,394,104

)

 

$

334,708,115

 

(2) Retroactively restated from the earliest period presented for the Torchlight reverse acquisition (“Torchlight RTO”) and CPM reverse recapitalization (“CPM RTO”)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.statements

4339


 

META MATERIALS INC.

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  Year  Year 
  Ended  Ended 
  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities        
Net loss $(12,781,896) $(9,839,396)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operations:        
Stock based compensation  404,900   942,470 
Stock issued for interest payments on notes payable  -   183,714 
Accrued interest payable in stock  226,884   228,057 
Bad debt expense  15,606   34,500 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  309,821   286,584 
Accretion of note discounts  82,605   229,166 
Amortization of beneficial conversion on convertible notes  680,072   199,972 
Debt conversion expense  176,400   - 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  820,441   4,393,160 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  1,999,866   - 
Loss on sale of oil and gas property  2,928,276   - 
Impairment loss  2,108,301   1,494,769 
Change in:        
Accounts receivable  (15,638)  7,433 
Accounts receivable, related party  (30,627)  (61,693)
Production revenue receivable  79,364   194,169 
Prepayments - development costs  -   146,422 
Other assets  -   6,362 
Prepaid expenses  (7,666)  (35,026)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  940,651   311,603 
Related party payables  53,805   - 
Accrued interest payable  663,562   1,135,801 
Net cash from operating activities  (1,345,273)  (141,933)
         
Cash Flows From Investing Activities        
Investment in oil and gas properties  (6,141,201)  (8,783,658)
Convertible note receivable  (12,822)  - 
Proceeds from sale of oil and gas property  350,000   - 
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment  -   (6,564)
Net cash from investing activities  (5,804,023)  (8,790,222)
         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities        
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs  6,513,416   3,446,880 
Proceeds from stock subscription receivable  250,000   - 
Proceeds from notes payable  77,477   4,010,000 
Proceeds from convertible promissory notes  600,000   539,999 
Payment for extension of debt maturity  (250,000)  - 
Proceeds from exercise of warrants into common stock  -   184,843 
Net cash from financing activities  7,190,893   8,181,722 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  41,597   (750,433)
         
Cash - beginning of year  89,730   840,163 
         
Cash - end of year $131,327  $89,730 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for interest $1,595,154  $1,554,510 
Cash paid for state franchise tax $100  $4,441 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Debt converted by transfer of working interest $7,330,849  $- 
Common stock issued for prepayment of development costs $750,000  $- 
Common stock issued for oil and gas lease extension $-  $125,000 
Common stock issued for payment in kind on notes payable $314,107  $314,108 
Common stock issued for note principal and interest conversion $1,666,596  $50,000 
Common stock issued in payment of accounts payable and accrued liabilities $135,000  $- 
Common stock issued for note extension $16,000  $- 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable for property development costs $1,025,100  $(520,094)
Subscription receivable for sale of common stock $-  $250,000 
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible notes $-  $1,145,546 
Debt discount from fair value of warrants with convertible notes $-  $240,455 
Note receivable from third party $1,000,000  $- 
Account payable relieved in transfer of oil and gas properties $7,000  $- 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(90,997,261

)

 

$

(11,611,259

)

 

$

(8,444,967

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash finance (income) expense

 

 

(471,689

)

 

 

138,927

 

 

 

(448,437

)

Non-cash interest expense

 

 

902,940

 

 

 

1,052,776

 

 

 

959,838

 

Non-cash lease expense

 

 

439,791

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income tax

 

 

(852,063

)

 

 

(193,710

)

 

 

(83,549

)

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

3,491,493

 

 

 

2,326,220

 

 

 

2,360,043

 

Impairment of assets

 

 

237,013

 

 

 

4,018

 

 

 

66,765

 

Unrealized foreign currency exchange loss

 

 

407,352

 

 

 

205,001

 

 

 

313,387

 

Loss on financial instruments, net

 

 

40,540,091

 

 

 

844,993

 

 

 

280,319

 

Change in deferred revenue

 

 

(679,541

)

 

 

(551,374

)

 

 

(627,902

)

Non-cash government assistance

 

 

(544,932

)

 

 

(775,800

)

 

 

(500,051

)

Loss on debt settlement

 

 

19,253

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(401,186

)

Stock-based compensation

 

 

1,576,849

 

 

 

1,509,684

 

 

 

1,292,773

 

Non-cash consulting expense

 

 

6,513,378

 

 

 

2,307

 

 

 

91,993

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

 

 

4,652,415

 

 

 

(880,830

)

 

 

780,227

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(34,764,911

)

 

 

(7,929,047

)

 

 

(4,360,747

)

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of intangible assets

 

 

(1,133,894

)

 

 

(104,132

)

 

 

(42,332

)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(11,655,417

)

 

 

(555,013

)

 

 

(1,153,010

)

Purchase of short-term investments

 

 

(2,889,852

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired

 

 

(66,131,025

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from reverse takeover

 

 

146,954,733

 

 

 

3,072,136

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

 

65,144,545

 

 

 

2,412,991

 

 

 

(1,195,342

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from long-term debt

 

 

1,127,151

 

 

 

25,783

 

 

 

664,810

 

Repayments of long-term debt

 

 

(1,090,047

)

 

 

(190,633

)

 

 

(58,201

)

Proceeds from secured promissory notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,407,118

 

Proceeds from government grants

 

 

223,384

 

 

 

198,286

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from unsecured promissory notes

 

 

13,963,386

 

 

 

1,378,042

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from secured convertible debentures

 

 

 

 

 

3,630,019

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from unsecured convertible debentures

 

 

 

 

 

693,784

 

 

 

566,690

 

Proceeds on funding obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

982,263

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, net

 

 

 

 

 

598,546

 

 

 

765,879

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises

 

 

1,293,263

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from warrant exercises

 

 

138,726

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

15,655,863

 

 

 

6,333,827

 

 

 

5,328,559

 

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

46,035,497

 

 

 

817,771

 

 

 

(227,530

)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of the year

 

 

1,395,683

 

 

 

407,061

 

 

 

623,532

 

Effects of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

3,292

 

 

 

170,851

 

 

 

11,059

 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of the year

 

$

47,434,472

 

 

$

1,395,683

 

 

$

407,061

 

Supplemental cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued purchases of property, equipment and patents

 

 

1,692,969

 

 

 

1,449,197

 

 

 

440,751

 

Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities

 

 

3,590,148

 

 

 

309,907

 

 

 

109,735

 

Right-of-use assets and prepaid expenses recognized in exchange for common stock

 

 

2,149,381

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settlement of liabilities in common stock

 

 

51,992,451

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

479,061

 

Interest paid on debt

 

 

64,528

 

 

 

193,745

 

 

 

14,477

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

44

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.statements

40


META MATERIALS INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Corporate information

Meta Materials Inc. (the “Company” or “META” or “Resulting Issuer”) is a developer of high-performance functional materials and nanocomposites specializing in metamaterial research and products, nanofabrication, and computational electromagnetics. The Company’s registered office is located at 85 Swanson Road, Boxborough, Massachusetts 01719, and its principal executive office is located at 1 Research Drive, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

1.NATURE OF BUSINESS

TorchlightOn March 5, 2020, Metamaterial Inc. (“MMI” or “Resulting Issuer”). and Metamaterial Technologies Inc. (“MTI”) completed a business combination by way of a three-cornered amalgamation pursuant to which MTI amalgamated with a subsidiary of Continental Precious Minerals Inc. (“CPM”), known as Continental Precious Minerals Subco Inc. (“CPM Subco”), to become “Metacontinental Inc.” (the “CPM RTO”). The CPM RTO was completed pursuant to the terms and conditions of an amalgamation agreement dated August 16, 2019 between CPM, MTI and CPM Subco, as amended March 4, 2020. Following the completion of the RTO, Metacontinental Inc. is carrying on the business of the former MTI, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of CPM. In connection with the RTO, CPM changed its name effective March 2, 2020 from Continental Precious Minerals Inc. to MMI. The common stock of CPM was delisted from the TSX Venture Exchange on March 4, 2020 and was posted for trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”) on March 9, 2020 under the symbol “MMAT”.

For accounting purposes, the legal subsidiary, MTI, has been treated as the accounting acquirer and CPM, the legal parent, has been treated as the accounting acquiree. The transaction has been accounted for as a reverse recapitalization. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements are a continuation of MTI consolidated financial statements prior to March 5, 2020 and exclude the balance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive loss, statement of changes in stockholder’s equity and statements of cash flows of CPM prior to March 5, 2020. See note 3 for additional information.

On December 14, 2020, the Company (formerly known as “Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. was incorporated” or “Torchlight”) and its subsidiaries, Metamaterial Exchangeco Inc. (formerly named 2798832 Ontario Inc., “Canco”) and 2798831 Ontario Inc. (“Callco”), entered into an Arrangement Agreement (the “Arrangement Agreement”) with Metamaterial Inc., an Ontario corporation headquartered in October 2007Nova Scotia, Canada (“MMI”), to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of MMI by way of a statutory plan of arrangement (the “Arrangement”) under the lawsBusiness Corporations Act (Ontario), on and subject to the terms and conditions of the StateArrangement Agreement (the “Torchlight RTO”). On June 25, 2021, the Company implemented a reverse stock split, changed its name from “Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.” to “Meta Materials Inc.” and changed its trading symbol from “TRCH” to “MMAT”. On June 28, 2021, following the satisfaction of Nevadathe closing conditions set forth in the Arrangement Agreement, the Arrangement was completed.

On June 28, 2021, and pursuant to the completion of the Arrangement Agreement, the Company began trading on the NASDAQ under the symbol “MMAT” while MMI common stock was delisted from the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”) and at the same time, Metamaterial Exchangeco Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of META, started trading under the symbol “MMAX” on the CSE. Certain previous shareholders of MMI elected to convert their common stock of MMI into exchangeable shares in Metamaterial Exchangeco Inc. These exchangeable shares, which can be converted into common stock of META at the option of the holder, are similar in substance to common shares of META and have been included in the determination of outstanding common shares of META.

For accounting purposes, the legal subsidiary, MMI, has been treated as Pole Perfect Studios, Inc. (“PPS”)the accounting acquirer and the Company, the legal parent, has been treated as the accounting acquiree. The transaction has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition in accordance with ASC 805 Business Combinations. From its incorporationAccordingly, these consolidated financial statements are a continuation of MMI consolidated financial statements prior to November 2010,June 28, 2021 and exclude the company was primarily engagedbalance sheets, statements of operations and comprehensive loss, statement of changes in business start-up activities.stockholders’ equity and statements of cash flows of Torchlight prior to June 28, 2021. See note 3 for additional information.

 

We are engaged in the acquisition, exploitation and/or development of oil and natural gas properties in the United States. We operate our business through our subsidiaries Torchlight Energy Inc., Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC, Hudspeth Oil Corporation, Torchlight Hazel LLC, and Warwink Properties LLC.

2.GOING CONCERN

 

At December 31, 2020, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations. We had a net loss of $41


12,781,896 for the year ended December 31, 2020 and had accumulated losses of $

111,935,5972. Significant accounting policies since our inception. We expect to incur further losses in the development of our business. The Company had a working capital deficit as of December 31, 2020 of $2,375,509. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management’s plan to address the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern includes: (1) obtaining debt or equity funding from private placement, institutional, or public sources; (2) obtain loans from financial institutions, where possible, or (3) participating in joint venture transactions with third parties. Although management believes that it will be able to obtain the necessary funding to allow the Company to remain a going concern through the methods discussed above, there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful.Basis of presentation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and therefore, the financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amount and classifications of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

3.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company maintains its accounts on the accrual method of accountingrelated notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accounting principles followedAmerica (“US GAAP”). The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Meta Materials Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the methodsCompany). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Functional currency – Items included in the consolidated financial statements of applying those principles,each of the Company and its subsidiaries are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which materially affect the determination of financial position, results of operations and cash flows are summarized below:entity operates (the ‘functional currency’).

 

Reporting Currency – The reporting currency of the Company is in US Dollars. The consolidated financial statements, and the financial information contained herein, are reported in US dollars, except share amounts or as otherwise stated, as the Company believes this results in more relevant and reliable information for its financial statement users.

transactions and balances– Foreign currency transactions are recorded into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the associated transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the measurement at period end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the statement of operations.

translation The results and financial position of all subsidiaries that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

Company’s assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate at the date of the balance sheet;

Company’s income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates;

Company’s resulting exchange differences are recognized in other comprehensive income, a separate component of equity.

Use of estimatesThe preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaUS GAAP requires management to make estimates and certain assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the valuation of goodwill, the valuation of net assets acquired via business combinations; the valuation of oil & natural gas properties, and the valuation of financial instruments measured at fair value.

Cash and cash equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Inventory – Inventory is measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method (FIFO) for all inventory. Inventory consumed during research and development activities is recorded as a research and development expense.

Long-lived assets Long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by that asset or asset group to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary.

Assets held for sale – Assets held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. See Note 3 for further discussion of assets held for sale.

 

Basis42


Goodwill– Goodwill represents the excess of presentationthe purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net tangible and

intangible assets acquired. The carrying amount of goodwill is periodically reviewed for impairment (at a minimum annually)

and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of this asset may not be recoverable.

The Company first performs a qualitative assessment to test the reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment. Based on the qualitative

assessment, if it is determined that the fair value of our reporting unit is more likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of more than 50

percent) to be less than its carrying amount, the quantitative assessment of the impairment test is performed. In the quantitative assessment, the Company compares the fair value of our reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and the Company is not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference, but not exceeding the total carrying value of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit, would be recorded.

Acquired intangiblesIn accordance with ASC 805 Business Combinations, the Company allocates the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Such valuations may require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Acquired intangible assets consist of acquired technology and customer relationships. In valuing acquired intangible assets, the Company makes assumptions and estimates based in part on projected financial information, which makes assumptions and estimates inherently uncertain, particularly for early-stage technology companies. The financial statementssignificant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value of acquired intangible technology assets include the revenue growth rate, the royalty rate and the discount rate. The significant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value of acquired customer contract intangible assets include the revenue growth rate and the discount rate.

As a result of the judgments that need to be made, the Company obtains the assistance of independent valuation firms. The Company completes these assessments as soon as practical after the closing dates. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

Business combinations - The Company allocates the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill to reporting units based on the expected benefit from the business combination. Allocation of purchase consideration to identifiable assets and liabilities affects the amortization expense, as acquired finite-lived intangible assets are presentedamortized over the useful life, whereas any indefinite-lived intangible assets, including goodwill, are not amortized. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from business combinations and are expensed as incurred.

Leases - The Company is a lessee in several non-cancellable operating leases for buildings. The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC 842 Leases. The Company determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at contract inception. The Company recognizes a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date.

For operating leases, the lease liability is initially and subsequently measured at the present value of the unpaid lease payments at the lease commencement date. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a consolidatedstraight-line basis over the lease term. For finance leases, the lease liability is initially measured in the same manner and include alldate as for operating leases and is subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective-interest rate method.

The ROU asset is initially measured at cost, which comprises the initial amount of the accountslease liability adjusted for lease payments made at or before the lease commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred less any lease incentives received. The ROU asset is subsequently measured throughout the lease term at the carrying amount of Torchlight Energy Resources Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Torchlight Energy, Inc., Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC, Hudspeth Oil Corporation, Torchlight Hazel LLC, and Warwink Properties LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.the lease liability, plus initial direct costs, plus (minus) any prepaid (accrued) lease payments, less the unamortized balance of lease incentives received.

45

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

3.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - continued

Government grants and assistance Government grants are recognized at their fair value in the period when there is reasonable assurance that the conditions attaching to the grant will be met and that the grant will be received. Grants are recognized as income over the periods necessary to match them with the related costs that they are intended to compensate. When the grant relates to an asset, it is recognized as income over the useful life of the depreciable asset by way of government assistance.

RisksThe Company also receives interest-free repayable loans from the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (“ACOA”), a government agency. The benefit of the loan at a below-market rate of interest is treated as a government grant, measured as the difference between proceeds received and uncertaintiesthe fair value of the loan based on prevailing market interest rates. The Company’s operations are subjectfair value of the components, being the loan and the government grant, must be calculated initially in order to significant risksallocate the proceeds to the components. The valuation is complex, as there is no active trading market for these items and uncertainties, including financial, operational, technological, and other risks associated with operating an emerging business, including the potential risk of business failure.is based on unobservable inputs.

 

43


Revenue recognitionThe COVID-19 pandemic causedCompany’s revenue is generated from product sales as well as development revenue. The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies performance obligations under the global economyterms of its contracts, and control of its products is transferred to enter a recessionary period, which may be prolonged and severe. During 2020,its customers in an amount that reflects the exploration and production industry facedconsideration the dual impact of demand deteriorationCompany expects to receive from COVID-19 and market oversupply from increased production, which caused oil and natural gas prices to decline significantlyits customers in exchange for most of the year. It is uncertain how the pandemic may impact our future operations.those products or services.

 

ConcentrationRevenue from the sale of risks – At timesprototypes and finished products is recognized at the Company’s cash balancespoint in time when control of the asset is transferred to the customer, generally on delivery of goods. The Company considers whether there are other obligations in excessthe contract that are separate performance obligations to which a portion of amounts guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company’s cash is placed with a highly rated financial institution, andtransaction price needs to be allocated. In determining the transaction price for the sale of prototypes, the Company regularly monitorsconsiders the credit worthinesseffects of variable consideration, the existence of significant financial institutions with which it does business.components, non-cash consideration and consideration payable to the customer (if any).

 

Revenue from development activities is recognized over time, using an input method to measure progress towards complete satisfaction of the research activities and associated performance obligations identified within each contract have been satisfied.

Deferred revenue – consist of fees invoiced or paid by the Company’s customers for which the associated performance obligations have not been satisfied and revenue has not been recognized based on the Company’s revenue recognition criteria described above.

Deferred revenue is reported in a net position on an individual contract basis at the end of each reporting period and is classified as current in the consolidated balance sheet when the revenue recognition associated with the related customer payments and invoicing is expected to occur within one year of the balance sheet date and as long-term when the revenue recognition associated with the related customer payments and invoicing is expected to occur more than one year from the balance sheet date.

Fair value measurements – The Company uses valuation approaches that maximize the use of financial instruments – Financial instruments consistobservable inputs and minimize the use of cash, receivables, convertible note receivable, payables and promissory notes, if any. The estimated fair values of cash, receivables, and payables approximate the carrying amount dueunobservable inputs to the relatively short maturity of these instruments.extent possible. The carrying amounts of any promissory notes approximate theirCompany determines fair value giving affect forbased on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in the term of the note and the effective interest rates. The recorded value of the Company’s convertible note receivable reflects the amount which management believes approximates fair value.

For assets and liabilities that require re-measurement toprincipal or most advantageous market. When considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the Company categorizes them in a three-levelfollowing fair value hierarchy as follows:distinguishes between observable and unobservable inputs, which are categorized in one of the following levels:

Level 1 inputs areinputs: Unadjusted quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.liabilities accessible to the reporting entity at the measurement date.

Level 2 inputs areinputs: Other than quoted prices for similar assets and liabilitiesincluded in active markets orLevel 1 inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, throughfor substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 inputs: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market corroboration.activity for the asset or liability at measurement date.

 

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on management’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.

Fair value option

A– Under the Fair Value Option Subsections of ASC Subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments – Overall, the Company has the irrevocable option to report certain financial asset or liability’s classification withinassets and financial liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with changes in fair value reported in the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant tostatement of operations. Any changes in the fair value measurement.of liabilities resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk are reported in other comprehensive income.

Research and development – Research and development activities are expensed as incurred.

 

44


Cash

Basic and cash equivalentsdiluted earnings (loss) per share – - Cash Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share gives effect to all dilutive potential common stock outstanding during the period including stock options, deferred stock units (“DSUs”), Restricted Share Units ("RSUs"), and cash equivalents include certain investmentswarrants which are calculated using the treasury stock method, and convertible debt instruments using the if-converted method. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share excludes all dilutive potential stock if their effect is anti-dilutive.

Stock based compensation – The Company recognizes compensation expense for equity awards based on the grant date fair value of the award. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for awards granted to employees that have a graded vesting schedule based on a service condition only on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in highly liquid instrumentssubstance, multiple awards (the “graded-vesting attribution method”), based on the estimated grant date fair value for each separately vesting tranche. For equity awards with original maturitiesa graded vesting schedule and a combination of three months or less.service and performance conditions, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense using a graded-vesting attribution method over the requisite service period when the achievement of a performance-based milestone is probable, based on the relative satisfaction of the performance condition as of the reporting date.

 

Accounts receivable – Accounts receivable consist of uncollateralized oilFor stock-based awards granted to consultants and natural gas revenues due under normal trade terms, as well as amounts due from working interest owners of oilnon-employees, compensation expense is recognized using the graded-vesting attribution method over the period during which services are rendered by such consultants and gas properties for their share of expenses paid on their behalf by the Company. Management reviews receivables periodically and reduces the carrying amount by a valuation allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amount that may not be collectible. As of December 31, 2020, no valuation allowance was considered necessary. Bad debt expense for 2020 and 2019 was $15,606 and $34,500, respectively.non-employees until completed.

OilThe measurement date for each tranche of employee awards is the date of grant, and gas properties – The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for exploration and development activitiesstock-based compensation costs are recognized as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Under this method of accounting, the costs of unsuccessful, as well as successful, exploration and development activities are capitalized as properties and equipment. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to property acquisition, exploration and development activities but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities.

Oil and gas properties include costs that are excluded from costs being depleted or amortized. Oil and natural gas property costs excluded represent investments in unevaluated properties and include non-producing leasehold, geological, and geophysical costs associated with leasehold or drilling interests and exploration drilling costs. The Company allocates a portion of its acquisition costs to unevaluated properties based on relative value. Costs are transferred to the full cost pool as the properties are evaluatedexpense over the life ofemployees’ requisite service period, which is the reservoir. Unevaluated properties are reviewed for impairment at least quarterly and are determined through an evaluation considering, among other factors, seismic data, requirements to relinquish acreage, drilling results, remaining time in the commitment period, remaining capital plan, and political, economic, and market conditions.vesting period.

Gains and losses on the sale of oil and gas properties are not generally reflected in income unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. Sales of less than 100% of the Company’s interest in the oil and gas property are treated as a reduction of the capital cost of the field, with no gain or loss recognized, as long as doing so does not significantly affect the unit-of-production depletion rate. Costs of retired equipment, net of salvage value, are usually charged to accumulated depreciation.

46

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - continued

Capitalized interest The Company capitalizes interest on unevaluated properties during the periods in which they are excluded from costs being depleted or amortized. During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company capitalized $2,353,700 and $2,858,753, respectively, of interest on unevaluated properties.

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization – The depreciable base for oil and natural gas properties includes the sum of all capitalized costs net of accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization (“DD&A”), estimated future development costs and asset retirement costs not included in oil and natural gas properties, less costs excluded from amortization. The depreciable base of oil and natural gas properties is amortized on a unit-of-production method.

Ceiling test – Future production volumes from oil and gas properties are a significant factor in determining the full cost ceiling limitation of capitalized costs. Under the full cost method of accounting, the Company is required to periodically perform a “ceiling test” that determines a limit on the book value of oil and gas properties. If the net capitalized cost of proved oil and gas properties, net of related deferred income taxes, plus the cost of unproved oil and gas properties, exceeds the present value of estimated future net cash flows discounted at 10 percent, net of related realizable tax affects, plus the cost of unproved oil and gas properties, the excess is charged to expense and reflected as additional accumulated DD&A. The Company recorded an impairment expense of $2,108,301 and $1,494,769 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, to recognize the adjustment required by the ceiling test.

 

The ceiling test calculation uses a commodity price assumption which is based onCompany estimates the unweighted arithmetic average of the price on the first day of each month for each month within the prior 12-month period and excludes future cash outflows related to estimated abandonment costs.

The determination of oil and gas reserves is a subjective process, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of available data and the application of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Estimates of economically recoverable reserves and future net cash flows depend on a number of variable factors and assumptions that are difficult to predict and may vary considerably from actual results. In particular, reserve estimates for wells with limited or no production history are less reliable than those based on actual production. Subsequent re-evaluation of reserves and cost estimates related to future development of proved oil and gas reserves could result in significant revisions to proved reserves. Other issues, such as changes in regulatory requirements, technological advances, and other factors which are difficult to predict could also affect estimates of proved reserves in the future.

Asset retirement obligations – Thegrant date fair value of a liabilityawards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and estimates the number of forfeitures expected to occur. The Company may use other pricing models when applicable such as Monte-Carlo simulation. See note 15 for an asset’s retirement obligation (“ARO”) is recognizedthe Company’s assumptions used in connection with option grants made during the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, with the corresponding charge capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then-present value each subsequent period, and the capitalized cost is depleted over the useful life of the related asset. Abandonment costs incurred are recorded as a reduction of the ARO liability.periods covered by these consolidated financial statements.

 

Inherent in the fair value calculation of an ARO are numerous assumptions and judgments including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement, and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental, and political environments. To the extent future revisions to these assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding adjustment is made to the oil and gas property balance. Settlements greater than or less than amounts accrued as ARO are recorded as a gain or loss upon settlement.

Income taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized.

 

Authoritative guidance for uncertainty in income taxes requires that the Company recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an examination. Management has reviewed the Company’s tax positions and determined there were no uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the consolidated financial statements. Company tax returns remain subject to Federal, Provincial and State tax examinations. Generally, the applicable statutes of limitation are three to four years from their respective filings.filings.

47

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - continued

 

Estimated interest

45


Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

ASU 2019-12

Effective January 1, 2021, the Company adopted ASU 2019-12 on a prospective basis. The new standard was issued in December 2019 with the intent of simplifying the accounting for income taxes. The accounting update removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 740 Income Taxes and penaltiesprovides simplification by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2020-09

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-09, Debt (Topic 470): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-10762. The amendments in ASU 2020-09 amend rules focused on the provision of material, relevant, and decision-useful information regarding guarantees and other credit enhancements and eliminate prescriptive requirements that have imposed unnecessary burdens and incentivized issuers of securities with guarantees and other credit enhancements to offer and sell those securities on an unregistered basis. The adopted amendments relate to the financial disclosure requirements for guarantors and issuers of guaranteed securities registered or being registered in Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X, and affiliates whose securities collateralize securities registered or being registered in Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X. The amendments in ASU 2020-09 are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company adopted ASU 2020-09 on January 1, 2021 and its adoption did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

ASU 2020-10

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-10, Codification Improvements, which updated various codification topics by clarifying or improving disclosure requirements to potential underpaymentalign with the SEC’s regulations. The amendments in ASU 2020-10 are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, for public business entities. The Company adopted ASU 2020-10 on any unrecognized tax benefits are classified asJanuary 1, 2021 and its adoption did not have a componentmaterial effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

ASU 2021-04

In April 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260). This guidance clarifies and reduces diversity in an issuer’s accounting for modifications or exchanges of tax expensefreestanding equity-classified written call options due to a lack of explicit guidance in the statements of operation.FASB Codification. This guidance is effective for the Company's interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021. The Company has not recorded any interest or penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits for any periods covered by theseis currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Share-based compensation – Compensation cost for equity awards is based on the fair value of the equity instrument on the date of grant and is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.

The Company accounts for stock option awards using the calculated value method. The expected term was derived using the simplified method provided in Securities and Exchange Commission release Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110, which averages an awards weighted average vesting period and contractual term for “plain vanilla” share options.

The Company accounts for any forfeitures of options when they occur. Previously recognized compensation cost for an award is reversed in the period that the award is forfeited.

The Company also issues equity awards to non-employees. The fair value of these option awards is estimated when the award recipient completes the contracted professional services. The Company recognizes expense for the estimated total value of the awards during the period from their issuance until performance completion.

The Company values warrant and option awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Revenue recognition – The Company’s revenue is typically generated from contracts to sell natural gas, crude oil or NGLs produced from interests in oil and gas properties owned by the Company. Contracts for the sale of natural gas and crude oil are evidenced by (1) base contracts for the sale and purchase of natural gas or crude oil, which document the general terms and conditions for the sale, and (2) transaction confirmations, which document the terms of each specific sale. The transaction confirmations specify a delivery point which represents the point at which control of the product is transferred to the customer. These contracts frequently meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815, and are accounted for as derivatives unless the Company elects to treat them as normal sales as permitted under that guidance. The Company elects to treat contracts to sell oil and gas production as normal sales, which are then accounted for as contracts with customers. The Company has determined that these contracts represent multiple performance obligations which are satisfied when control of the commodity transfers to the customer, typically through the delivery of the specified commodity to a designated delivery point.

Revenues from oil and gas sales are detailed as follows:

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Revenues        
         
Oil sales $187,755  $716,014 
         
Gas sales  5,624   30,249 
         
Total $193,379  $746,263 

Revenue is measured based on consideration specified in the contract with the customer, and excludes any amounts collected on behalf of third parties. The Company recognizes revenue in the amount that reflects the consideration it expects to be entitled to in exchange for transferring control of those goods to the customer. Amounts allocated in the Company’s price contracts are based on the standalone selling price of those products in the context of long-term contracts. Payment is generally received one or two months after the sale has occurred.

48

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES- continued

Gain or loss on derivative instruments is outside the scope of ASC 606 and is not considered revenue from contracts with customers subject to ASC 606. The Company may in the future use financial or physical contracts accounted for as derivatives as economic hedges to manage price risk associated with normal sales, or in limited cases may use them for contracts the Company intends to physically settle but do not meet all of the criteria to be treated as normal sales.

Producer Gas Imbalances. The Company applies the sales method of accounting for natural gas revenue. Under this method, revenues are recognized based on the actual volume of natural gas sold to purchasers.

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed in the same way as basic earnings (loss) per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would be outstanding if all potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. The calculation of diluted earnings per share excludes 11,027,390 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and options because their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Environmental laws and regulations – The Company is subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit. The Company believes that it is in compliance with existing laws and regulations. The Company accrued no liability as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted –

ASU 2021-08

In June 2016,October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 326)805): MeasurementAccounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers, which clarifies that an acquirer of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which adds a newbusiness should recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities in a business combination in accordance with ASC Topic 326 to the Codification and removes the thresholds that companies apply to measure credit losses on financial instruments measured at amortized cost, such as loans, receivables, and held-to-maturity debt securities. Under current GAAP, companies generally recognize credit losses when it is probable that the loss has been incurred. The revised606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This guidance will remove all recognition thresholds and will require companies to recognize an allowance for credit lossesbe effective for the difference between the amortized cost basis of a financial instrumentCompany's interim and the amount of amortized cost that the company expects to collect over the instrument’s contractual life. ASU 2016-13 also amends the credit loss measurement guidance for available-for sale debt securities and beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. The guidance is applicable for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interimannual reporting periods within those years, however, the FASB extended the effective date for smaller reporting companies to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this standardnew guidance on its related disclosures.consolidated financial statements.

 

Other recentlyASU 2021-10

In November 2021, the FASB issued or adoptedASU 2021-10, Government Assistance (Topic 832): Disclosure by Business Entities about Government Assistance, which improves the transparency of government assistance received by most business entities by requiring the disclosure of: (1) the types of government assistance received; (2) the accounting pronouncements are not expected to have, or did not have,for such assistance; and (3) the effect of the assistance on a materialbusiness entity's financial statements. This guidance is effective for the Company's interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the Company’sits consolidated financial position or results from operations.statements.

 

Subsequent events –46


3. Acquisitions and preferred stock liability

Torchlight RTO

Arrangement

As discussed in note 1, on December 14, 2020, Meta Materials Inc. and its subsidiaries, Metamaterial Exchangeco Inc. and 2798831 Ontario Inc. (“Callco”) entered into an Arrangement Agreement with Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of MMI. On March 12, 2021, MMI’s annual general and special meeting was held and MMI’s securityholders approved the Arrangement and on June 11, 2021, approval was obtained from Torchlight shareholders through a special meeting.

On June 25, 2021, Torchlight effected a reverse stock split of its Common Stock, at a ratio of two-to-one, changed its name from “Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc.” to “Meta Materials Inc.” and declared a dividend, on a one-for-one basis, of stock of Series A Non-Voting Preferred Stock to holders of record of Company Common Stock as of June 24, 2021.

On June 28, 2021, following the satisfaction of the closing conditions set forth in the Arrangement Agreement, the Arrangement was completed. The stock of Company Common Stock, previously traded on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “TRCH,” commenced trading on the NASDAQ under the ticker symbol “MMAT”.

47


Securities conversion

Pursuant to the completion of the Arrangement, each common share of MMI that was issued and outstanding immediately prior to June 28, 2021 was converted into the right to receive 1.845 newly issued shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share of the Resulting Issuer or stock of Canco, which are exchangeable for shares of the Resulting Issuer at the election of each former MMI stockholder. In addition, all of MMI’s outstanding options, deferred share units and other securities exercisable or exchangeable for, or convertible into, and any other rights to acquire MMI Common Stock were exchanged for securities exercisable or exchangeable for, or convertible into, or other rights to acquire Resulting Issuer Common Stock. Immediately following the completion of the RTO, the former security holders of MMI owned approximately 70% of the Resulting Issuer Common Stock, accordingly, the former shareholders of MMI, as a group, retained control of the Resulting Issuer, and while Torchlight was the legal acquirer of MMI, MMI was deemed to be the acquirer for accounting purposes.

Reverse acquisition

Pursuant to ASC 805 Business Combinations, the transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition since: (i) the shareholders of MMI owned the majority of the outstanding common stock of the Company after the share exchange; (ii) a majority of the directors of the Company are also directors of MMI; and (iii) the previous officers of the Company were replaced with officers designated by MMI. The Company evaluated subsequent events through March 18,and MMI remain separate legal entities (with the Company as the parent of MMI). These consolidated financial statements are those of MMI prior to June 28, 2021 and exclude the datebalance sheets, results of operations and comprehensive loss, statement of changes in stockholders' equity, and statements of cash flows of Torchlight prior to June 28, 2021.

Measuring the Consideration Transferred

The accounting acquirer issued no cash consideration for the acquiree. Instead, the accounting acquiree issued its 196,968,803 common shares to the owners of the accounting acquirer. However, the acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred by the accounting acquirer for its interest in the accounting acquiree is based on the number of equity interests the legal subsidiary would have had to issue to give the owners of the legal parent the same percentage equity interest in the combined entity that results from the reverse acquisition. Accordingly, the consideration transferred of $358,138,773 was based on the following calculation:

The assumption that MMI would have issued 44,885,634 shares to Torchlight in order for MMI shareholders to own approximately 70% of the outstanding Combined Company Stock at a share price of $7.96, the closing share price of MMI on June 28, 2021 to equal $357,289,644.
Adding the fair value of deemed issuance of theseTorchlight options and warrants that were outstanding at the time of acquisition.
Deducting the estimated fair value of the previously existing unsecured promissory notes issued by MMI to Torchlight of $11,000,000 plus interest. These notes were effectively settled pursuant to the closing of the Arrangement.

The fair value of the number of equity interests calculated in that way can be used as the fair value of consideration transferred in exchange for the acquiree. The assets and liabilities of the legal acquiree are measured and recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Subsequent events are disclosed in Note 11.statements at their pre-combination carrying amounts.

 

48


Presentation of Consolidated Financial Statements Post Reverse Acquisition

The consolidated financial statements reflect all of the following:

a)
the assets and liabilities of the legal subsidiary (the accounting acquirer) recognized and measured at their pre-combination carrying amounts
b)
the assets and liabilities of the legal parent (the accounting acquiree) recognized and measured in accordance with ASC 805 Business Combinations
c)
the retained earnings and other equity balances of the legal subsidiary (accounting acquirer) before the business combination
d)
the amount recognized as issued equity interests in the consolidated financial statements determined by adding the issued equity interest of the legal subsidiary (the accounting acquirer) outstanding immediately before the business combination to the fair value of the legal parent (accounting acquiree). However, the equity structure (that is, the number and type of equity interests issued) reflects the equity structure of the legal parent (the accounting acquiree)

All references to common stock, options, deferred share units, and warrants as well as per share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect the number of shares of the legal parent (accounting acquiree) issued in the reverse acquisition.

Pursuant to the completion of Torchlight RTO on June 28, 2021 and as a result of information presented post acquisition, the Company has made the following changes to the purchase price allocation previously disclosed in the interim financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 in Form 10-Q:

decreased the consideration by $169,592 and reclassed the preferred stock liability from the consideration value to the acquired liabilities.
decreased the value of the acquired oil and natural gas ("O&G") assets and the preferred stock liability by $197,608 and $5,306,354 respectively, to reflect the finalization of a third-party valuation study of the O&G assets as of June 28, 2021.
decreased working capital by $1,034,288 as a result of recording pre-acquisition receivable of $3,404,866, liabilities of $865,650 and reduce cash as of June 28, 2021 by $3,573,504. The pre-acquisition receivable represents shares issued before acquisition date where the cash was received immediately after the acquisition date.
As a result, the Goodwill balance has decreased by $4,244,265.

The Company believes that information gathered to date provides a reasonable basis for estimating the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, however the Company is waiting for additional information necessary to finalize these fair values including assessment of any tax assets and liabilities and tax position in different jurisdictions. Therefore, the provisional measurements of fair value set forth below are subject to change. The Company expects to complete the purchase price allocation as soon as practicable but no later than one year from the acquisition date.

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the net assets acquired based on the respective fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities:

 

4.

Amount

OIL & GAS PROPERTIES

Fair value of deemed issuance of MMI’s stock – Common Stock

$

82,814

Fair value of deemed issuance of MMI’s stock – Additional paid in capital

357,206,830

Fair value of Torchlight’s outstanding warrants – Additional paid in capital

2,773,778

Fair value of Torchlight’s outstanding options – Additional paid in capital

9,397,988

Total Effect on Equity

369,461,410

Effective settlement of notes payable by MMI to Torchlight 1

(11,322,637

)

$

358,138,773

Net assets (liabilities) of Torchlight:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

143,381,229

Other assets

3,906,290

Oil and natural gas properties 2

72,600,000

Preferred stock liability 2

(72,600,000

)

Accounts payable

(2,496,510

)

Other liabilities

(21,937

)

Goodwill 3

213,369,701

$

358,138,773

 

The following table presents the 49


capitalized costs

1 Notes receivable/payable

Notes receivable or payable represent unsecured promissory notes previously issued by MMI to Torchlight between September 20, 2020 to February 18, 2021 for oil & gas propertiesproceeds of the Company : $11,000,000 plus interest. These notes have been eliminated upon acquisition and subsequent consolidation (see note 10 to these consolidated financial statements for further details).

 

2 Oil and natural gas properties and preferred stock liability

  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
       
Evaluated costs subject to amortization $15,656,182  $13,243,541 
Unevaluated costs  30,857,959   39,667,740 
Total capitalized costs  46,514,141   52,911,281 
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion  and amortization  (15,656,182)  (12,729,238)
Total oil and gas properties $30,857,959  $40,182,043 

 

Unevaluated costsValuation at acquisition

Acquired oil and natural gas properties include the Orogrande Project property in West Texas and the Hazel Project property in the Midland basin in West Texas. Refer to note 5 for additional details.

The Company engaged an independent valuation firm to assist in the determination of the fair value of the Orogrande Project property and the Hazel Project property as of June 28, 2021 and December 31, 2021.

The estimated fair value of the Orogrande Project property was calculated as the sum of the median of each of:

a range of fair values of identified drilling locations determined using numerous assumptions including the number of drilling locations, forecasted production volumes per drilling location, fair value per barrel of forecasted production volumes based on comparable transactions or entities with acreage proximal to the Orogrande Project property, and applying a drilling location risk factor (collectively, “drilling location assumptions”); and
a range of fair values of the undeveloped land acreage determined using numerous assumptions including the number of undeveloped land acres, fair value per acre for comparable transactions or entities with acreage proximal to the Orogrande Project property, and applying an acreage risk factor (collectively, “undeveloped land assumptions”).

The estimated fair value of the Hazel Project property was calculated using a discounted cash flow model. The significant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value of the Hazel Project property at acquisition date included forecasted production volumes, forecasted commodity prices, and the discount rate.

The Company valuation concluded an implied enterprise value as of June 28, 2021 to be between $57.7 million and $101.1 million. The Company recorded the fair value of the Orogrande Project property at $71.1 million and the fair value of the Hazel Project property at $1.5 million, totaling a value of $72.6 million.

On June 11, 2021, Torchlight’s stockholders approved an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of Torchlight’s preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Preferred Stock”), from 10,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares. In addition, Torchlight’s Board of Directors formally declared the Preferred Dividend and set June 24, 2021 as the Dividend Record Date.

On June 25, 2021, the Company declared a dividend, on a one-for-one basis, of shares of Series A Non-Voting Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) to holders of record of Torchlight’s common stock as of June 24, 2021. This preferred stock entitles its holders to receive certain dividends based on the net proceeds of the sale of any assets that are used or held for use in the Company’s oil and gas exploration business (the “O&G Assets”), subject to certain holdbacks. Such asset sales must occur prior to the earlier of (i) December 31, 2021 or (ii) the date which is six months from the closing of the Arrangement, or such later date as may be agreed between the Company and the individual appointed to serve as the representative of the holders of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Sale Expiration Date”). The Series A Preferred Stock will automatically be cancelled once the entitled dividends have been paid.

As a result, the fair value measurement of the oil and natural gas properties also forms the basis for the fair value measurement of the preferred stock liability as of June 28, 2021 and as of December 31, 2021. The preferred stock liability is accounted for in accordance with ASC 480 Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.

50


2021 developments

After the closing of the merger transaction with Torchlight, the Company engaged in a series of activities related to the oil and gas assets to ensure that compliance with the relevant leases was maintained and that the lease rights retained their value in advance of a possible sale or other disposition. The activities over a 4-month period were focused on the obligation to drill four wells on the subject leased property by year-end 2021 to ensure continued compliance with the lease requirements. The activities included assembly of a team of professionals to manage the efforts, permitting, site preparation, drilling equipment rentals, pad preparations at each of the four sites and a variety of site clean-up, data summarization and similar activities. In 2021, the Company invested approximately $14.2 million in these activities to preserve compliance and the value of the assets. These costs were initially capitalized and then assessed at December 31, 2021 to determine if an adjustment was required to the carrying value based on the updated fair value determination. In addition to the drilling activities, the Company organized a new wholly owned subsidiary to enable consolidation of the leases into one company to help facilitate any future sale or other disposition of the assets and provide additional structural alternatives for such sale or disposition.

Valuation at December 31, 2021

The Company continues to actively explore the sale of the assets or spinout, should a sale not occur. The Company estimated the fair value of the O&G assets by obtaining a valuation study performed by a third party valuation firm. The estimates involved are consistent with those outlined above as part of the acquisition. The valuation concluded an implied enterprise value as of December 31, 2021 to be between $55.1 million and $109.0 million. The Company recorded the fair value of the Orogrande Project property at $72.0 million and the fair value of the Hazel Project property at $3.5 million, totaling a value of $75.5 million.

There are 164,923,363 outstanding Series A Non-Voting Preferred shares as of December 31, 2021.

3 Goodwill

Goodwill is attributed to the difference between the total consideration calculated above and deemed to be transferred by the accounting acquirer (MMI) and, the total net assets of the accounting acquiree (Torchlight). Based on the market value of META's Stock on June 28, 2021, this resulted in total “consideration” being transferred to Torchlight of approximately $358.1 million. Further, the net assets of Torchlight acquired by MMI has been estimated to be approximately $144.8 million. The difference between the $358.1 million of consideration deemed to have been transferred and the $144.8 million of net assets acquired results in goodwill of approximately $213.4 million. Torchlight is delivering a NASDAQ listed legal entity in good standing that will provide the Company with ready access to significant capital sources in the future to fund its growth plans.

The company deemed it necessary to perform an annual test for impairment at December 31, 2021 due to market conditions. As at December 31, 2021 0 impairment was found.

Revenue and losses from the Torchlight RTO since the acquisition date included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $NaN and $15.8 million respectively.

Unaudited pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 include cumulative costsare included below as if the Torchlight RTO occurred on developing projectsJanuary 1, 2020. This summary of the unaudited pro forma results of operations is not necessarily indicative of what the Company’s results of operations would have been had Torchlight been acquired at the beginning of 2020, nor does it purport to represent results of operations for any future periods.

 

 

Year ended

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

META excluding Torchlight

 

 

Torchlight

 

 

Total

 

 

META

 

 

Torchlight

 

 

Total

 

Revenue

 

$

4,082,517

 

 

$

94,537

 

 

$

4,177,054

 

 

$

1,122,183

 

 

$

193,379

 

 

$

1,315,562

 

Net loss

 

 

(75,181,395

)

 

 

(23,652,112

)

 

 

(98,833,507

)

 

 

(11,611,259

)

 

 

(12,781,896

)

 

 

(24,393,155

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add back: acquisition cost

 

 

3,220,870

 

 

 

4,103,184

 

 

 

7,324,054

 

 

 

724,129

 

 

 

 

 

 

724,129

 

Adjusted net loss

 

$

(71,960,525

)

 

$

(19,548,928

)

 

$

(91,509,453

)

 

$

(10,887,130

)

 

$

(12,781,896

)

 

$

(23,669,026

)

Acquisition cost includes legal, accounting, and other professional fees related to the Torchlight acquisition.

51


Nanotech acquisition

On August 5, 2021, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement to indirectly acquire Nanotech Security Corp. (“Nanotech”). On October 5, 2021, a wholly-owned subsidiary of META purchased 100% of Nanotech’s common stock at CA$1.25 per share. In addition, the transaction price included the settlement of certain Nanotech share awards outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the agreement, including the Orogranderepurchase and Hazel projectscancellation of 303,391 Nanotech restricted share units ("RSU") at a purchase price of CA$1.25 per RSU and the settlement of 4,359,000 Nanotech in-the-money stock options at a purchase price equal to CA$1.25 per option, less the exercise price thereof. The consideration payable to securityholders under the arrangement was payable in West Texas.cash, resulting in a total purchase price of $72.1 million (CA$90.8 million).

 

The Company periodically adjustsbelieves that information gathered to date provides a reasonable basis for estimating the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, however the Company is waiting for additional information necessary to finalize these fair values including assessment of any tax assets and liabilities and tax position in different jurisdictions. Therefore, the provisional measurements of fair value set forth below are subject to change. The Company expects to complete the purchase price allocation as soon as practicable but no later than one year from the acquisition date.

The preliminary allocation of consideration paid for the separationNanotech acquisition is summarized as follows:

 

 

Amount

 

Consideration paid to acquire Nanotech outstanding common stock

 

$

69,214,652

 

Consideration paid to repurchase Nanotech restricted stock units (RSUs)

 

 

300,610

 

Consideration paid to repurchase Nanotech stock options

 

 

2,612,035

 

 

 

$

72,127,297

 

Net assets (liabilities) of Nanotech:

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

5,974,254

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

741,783

 

Trade payables

 

 

(1,349,139

)

Prepaid expenses

 

 

271,741

 

Inventory

 

 

126,326

 

Property and equipment

 

 

14,771,456

 

Intangibles

 

 

25,309,847

 

Deferred tax liability

 

 

(859,394

)

Goodwill

 

 

27,140,423

 

 

 

$

72,127,297

 

The preliminary purchase price allocation is subject to change as additional information becomes available concerning the fair value and tax basis of evaluated versus unevaluated costs within its full the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including certain contracts and obligations. Any additional adjustments to the purchase price allocation will be made as soon as practicable but no later than one year from the date of acquisition.

The estimated fair value of acquired assets and liabilities has been measured as at the acquisition date based on a valuation report provided by a third-party valuation expert.

Acquired property, plant and equipment acquired totaling $14.8 million is comprised primarily of a production facility in Quebec, Canada with an estimated fair value of $6.0 million, as well as specialized machinery and equipment with an estimated fair value of $8.6 million.

Acquired intangible assets totaling $25.3 million include a developed optical thin film technology intangible asset ($0.2 million), a developed nanotechnology intangible asset ($14.8 million) as well as a customer contract intangible asset for $10.3 million. The significant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value of acquired intangible technology assets include the revenue growth rate, the royalty rate and the discount rate. The significant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value of the acquired customer contract intangible asset include the revenue growth rate and the discount rate.

The goodwill resulting from the transaction is attributable to different factors including assembled workforce, Nanotech's market potential, specific purchase synergies, technical know-how and expertise, customer service capabilities, geographical presence, and manufacturing capabilities.

52


Revenue and losses from the Nanotech acquisition since the acquisition date included in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $1.8 million and $0.9 million respectively.

Unaudited pro forma results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 are included below as if the Nanotech acquisition occurred on January 1, 2020. This summary of the unaudited pro forma results of operations is not necessarily indicative of what the Company’s results of operations would have been had Nanotech been acquired at the beginning of 2020, nor does it purport to represent results of operations for any future periods.

 

 

Year ended

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

 

META excluding Nanotech

 

 

Nanotech

 

 

Total

 

 

META

 

 

Nanotech

 

 

Total

 

Revenue

 

$

2,237,470

 

 

$

7,755,350

 

 

$

9,992,820

 

 

$

1,122,183

 

 

$

5,944,983

 

 

$

7,067,166

 

Net loss

 

 

(90,279,119

)

 

 

(2,942,395

)

 

 

(93,221,514

)

 

 

(11,611,259

)

 

 

(1,040,463

)

 

 

(12,651,722

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add back: acquisition cost

 

 

1,837,796

 

 

 

1,646,522

 

 

 

3,484,318

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deduct: additional depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

(3,143,659

)

 

 

(3,143,659

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,844,899

)

 

 

(3,844,899

)

Adjusted net loss

 

$

(88,441,323

)

 

$

(4,439,532

)

 

$

(92,880,855

)

 

$

(11,611,259

)

 

$

(4,885,362

)

 

$

(16,496,621

)

Acquisition cost pool to recognize the value impairmentincludes legal, accounting, and other professional fees related to the expiration of, or changes in market value, of unevaluated leases. The impact of reclassifications as they become necessary is to increase the basis for calculation of future period’s depletion,Nanotech acquisition. Additional depreciation and amortization which effectively recognizes the impairmentis based on the consolidated statement of operations over future periods. Reclassified costs also become evaluated costs for purposes of ceiling tests and which may cause recognition of increased impairment expense in future periods. The remaining cumulative unevaluated costs which have been reclassified within our full cost pool totals $5,881,635above-mentioned valuation report that was performed as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, evaluated costs are $-0- since we have no proved reserve value associated with our properties.at October 5, 2021.

49

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.OIL & GAS PROPERTIES - continued

 

Due

CPM RTO

As outlined in note 1, on August 16, 2019, MTI entered into an Amalgamation Agreement (“Amalgamation Agreement”) with CPM, a Canadian public company listed on the CSE in relation to a Reverse Takeover transaction of CPM by MTI (“CPM RTO”). On October 10, 2019, CPM shareholders approved matters ancillary to the volatilitytransaction and on November 25, 2019, MTI shareholders approved the CPM RTO. Subject to an amendment to the Amalgamation Agreement dated March 4, 2020, the CPM RTO was completed on March 5, 2020.

The CPM RTO was completed by the way of commodity prices, should oilthree-cornered amalgamation, whereby MTI was amalgamated with CPM Subco and natural gas prices declineholders of stock of MTI received common stock of MMI as consideration. Pursuant to the Amalgamation Agreement, the holders of the common stock of MTI (“MTI Common Stock”) and holders of MTI’s Class A-1 preferred stock of MTI received MMI Common Stock in exchange for their MTI Common Stock at a ratio of 2.75 MMI Common Stock for each MTI Common Share or Class A-1 Preferred share held. Also pursuant to the future, it is possible thatAmalgamation Agreement, the holders of MTI’s Class A-2 preferred stock received 4.125 Resultant Issuer Common Stock for each Class A-2 preferred share held.

Upon completion of the CPM RTO, all of MTI’s outstanding options, deferred share units and other securities exercisable or exchangeable for, or convertible into, and any other rights to acquire MTI Common Stock were exchanged for securities exercisable or exchangeable for, or convertible into, or other rights to acquire MMI Common Stock. Immediately following the completion of the CPM RTO, the former security holders of MTI owned approximately 86% of the Resulting Issuer Common Stock, on a further write-down could occur. Proved reserves are estimated quantitiesfully diluted basis; accordingly, the former shareholders of crude oil, natural gas,MTI, as a group, retained control of MMI, and natural gas liquids, which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certaintywhile CPM was the legal acquirer of MTI, MTI was deemed to be recoverable from known reservoirs under existing economicthe acquirer for accounting purposes. As CPM did not meet the definition of a business as defined in ASC 805—Business Combinations, the acquisition is not within the scope of ASC 805 and operating conditions. The independent engineering estimates include only those amountswas considered to be proved reserves and do not include additional amounts which may result from new discoveries in the future, or from application of secondary and tertiary recovery processes where facilities are not in place or for which transportation and/or marketing contracts are not in place. Estimated reserves to be developed through secondary or tertiary recovery processes are classified as unevaluated properties.a reverse recapitalization.

Current Projects

WeReverse recapitalization accounting applies when a non-operating public shell company (CPM) acquires a private operating company (MTI) and the owners and management of the private operating company have actual or effective voting and operating control of the combined company. A reverse recapitalization is equivalent to the issuance of stock by the private operating company for the net monetary assets of the public shell corporation accompanied by a recapitalization with accounting similar to that resulting from a reverse acquisition, except that no goodwill or other intangible assets are an energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation and/or development of oil and natural gas properties in the United States. We are primarily focused on the acquisition of early stage projects, the development and delineation of these projects, and then the monetization of those assets once these activities are completed.recorded.

 

Since 2010, our primary focusthe transaction was treated as capital transaction in substance, the consideration transferred was assumed to equal the fair value of CPM’s net monetary assets of $3,110,834. Consideration transferred was then allocated between stock and options based on the fair value of the options deemed to have been issued. Accordingly, $212,566 has been allocated to options as outlined in consolidated Statements of changes in stockholders’ equity with the developmentremainder $2,898,268 allocated to common stock.

53


The carrying value of interestsCPM’s assets and liabilities have been assumed to approximate their fair values, due to their short-term nature. The following table summarizes the monetary assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the March 5, 2020 exchange rate of $1.00 CAD = $0.7454 USD:

 

Amount

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

3,112,172

 

Marketable securities

 

3,274

 

Accounts receivable

 

20,277

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

(24,889

)

 

$

3,110,834

 

The fair value of CPM’s 700,000 options issued has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

Amount

Risk free interest rate

0.83% - 0.96%

Expected volatility

117% -134%

Expected dividend yield

0%

Expected forfeiture rate

0%

Fair value of Resulting Issuer Common Share

  CA$0.62

Exercise price of the options

  CA$0.35

Expected term for directors resigning from CPM board

6 months

Expected term for a director continuing as Resulting Issuer director

8 years

Revenue and losses from the CPM RTO since the acquisition date were Nil since acquisition.

4. Related party transactions

As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, receivables due from a related party (Lamda Guard Technologies Ltd, or “LGTL”) were for a nominal amount and $NaN, respectively. On March 16, 2021, MMI converted an amount of $0.3 million owing to LGTL into 81,584 MMI common stock for a price per share of CA$4.51. The conversion price of CA$4.51 per share represented a 10% premium to the CA$4.10 closing price of MMI stock on the CSE at the close of business on March 12, 2021. MMI has recognized $0.2 million in oil and gas projects we holdcommon stock in the Permian Basinconsolidated statements of changes in West Texas. We also hold minor interests in certain other oilstockholders’ equity at fair value at the time of conversion and gas projects in Central Oklahoma that we arerecorded the difference of $0.1 million between the fair value of the common stock and the carrying value of the extinguished liability as a loss on debt settlement in the processconsolidated statements of divesting.operations and comprehensive loss.

As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, related party payables due to LGTL were $Nil and $0.2 million respectively.

5. Assets held for sale

 

As of December 31, 2020, we had interests in three2021, assets held for sale represented the acquired oil and natural gas projects:properties from the Orogrande Project in Hudspeth County, Texas,Torchlight RTO. Refer to note 3 for details of the Hazel Project in Sterling, Tom Green, and Irion Counties, Texas, and two wells in Central Oklahoma.fair value determination.

Orogrande Project, West Texas

On August 7, 2014, weTorchlight entered into a Purchase Agreement with Hudspeth Oil Corporation (“Hudspeth”), McCabe Petroleum Corporation (“MPC”), and Gregory McCabe, ourTorchlight prior Chairman. Mr. McCabe was the sole owner of both Hudspeth and MPC. Under the terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement, weTorchlight purchased 100%100% of the capital stock of Hudspeth which held certain oil and gas assets, including a 100%100% working interest in approximately 172,000 predominately contiguous acres in the Orogrande Basin in West Texas. Mr. McCabe has, at his option, a 10%10% working interest back-in after payout and a reversionary interest if drilling obligations are not met, all under the terms and conditions of a participation and development agreement among Hudspeth, MPC and Mr. McCabe. Mr. McCabe also holds a 4.5%4.5% overriding royalty interest in the Orogrande acreage, - which he obtained prior to, and was not a part of the August 2014 transaction. As of December 31, 2020, leases covering approximately 134,000 acres remain in effect.

We believe all drilling obligations through December 31, 2020 have been met.

Effective March 27, 2017, the property became subject to a DDU Agreement which allows for all 192 existing leases covering approximately 134,000 net acres leased from University Lands to be combined into one drilling and development unit for development purposes. The term of the DDU Agreement expires on December 31, 2023, and the time to drill on the drilling and development unit

54


continues through December 2023. The DDU Agreement also grants the right to extend the DDU Agreement through December 2028 if compliance with the DDU Agreement is met and the extension fee associated with the additional time is paid.

 

Our drilling obligations include 4 wells in year 2020 and 5 wells per year in years 2021, 2022 and 2023. We received a waiver of the requirement to develop four wells in 2020. The drilling obligations are minimum yearly requirements and may be exceeded if acceleration is desired. 

50

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.OIL & GAS PROPERTIES - continued

On July 25, 2018, weTorchlight and Hudspeth entered into a Settlement & Purchase Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Founders (and Founders Oil & Gas Operating, LLC, former Operator), Wolfbone and MPC (entities controlled by ourTorchlight prior Chairman), which agreement provided for Founders assigning all of its working interest in the oil and gas leases of the Orogrande Project to Hudspeth and Wolfbone equally. Future well capital spending obligations remained the same 50%50% contribution from Hudspeth and 50%50% from Wolfbone until such time as the $40.5$40.5 million to be spent on the project. The Company estimates that there is still approximately $8.7 million remaining to be spent on the project until such time as the capital expenditures revert back to the percentages of the working interest owners.

The Company has drilled nine testCompany's outstanding drilling obligations includes 5 wells in the Orogrande in order to stay in compliance with University Lands D&D Unit Agreement, as well as, to test for potential shallow pay zones2022 and deeper pay zones that2023. All drilling obligations through December 31, 2021 have been met. The drilling obligations are minimum yearly requirements and may be present on structural plays. Development of the wells continued through the year ended December 31, 2020 to further capture and document the scientific base in support of demonstrating the production potential of the property. The Companyexceeded if acceleration is currently marketing the project for an outright sale or farm in partner. This marketing process has been long and arduous as the overall market is quite soft. Due to the size and scope of the project, we are dealing with very large companies that have multitudes of people reviewing our material, which in itself is extensive. Should a farm out partner or sale not occur, the Company and Wolfbone will continue to drill additional wells in the play in order to fulfill the obligations under the DDU Agreementdesired.

On March 9, 2020, holders of notes payable by the Company entered into a Conversion Agreement under which the noteholders elected to convert principal of $6,000,000 and approximately $1,331,000 of accrued interest on the notes, in accordance with their terms, into an aggregate 6% working interest (of all such holders) in the Orogrande Project.

The Orogrande Project ownership as of December 31, 20202021 is detailed as follows:

 

  Revenue  Working 
  Interest  Interest 
University Lands - Mineral Owner  20.000%  n/a 
         
ORRI - Magdalena Royalties, LLC, an entity controlled by Gregory McCabe, Chairman  4.500%  n/a 
         
ORRI - Unrelated Party  0.500%  n/a 
         
Hudspeth Oil Corporation, a subsidiary of Torchlight Energy Resources Inc.  49.875%  66.500%
         
Wolfbone Investments LLC, an entity controlled by Gregory McCabe, Chairman  18.750%  25.000%
         
Conversion by Note Holders in March, 2020  4.500%  6.000%
         
Unrelated Party  1.875%  2.500%
         
   100.000%  100.000%

51

 

 

Revenue Interest

 

 

Working Interest

 

University Lands - Mineral Owner

 

 

20.00

%

 

n/a

 

ORRI - Magdalena Royalties, LLC, and entity controlled by Gregory McCabe, Chairman

 

 

4.50

%

 

n/a

 

ORRI - Unrelated Party

 

 

0.50

%

 

n/a

 

Hudspeth Oil Corporation, a subsidiary of Meta Materials Inc.

 

 

49.88

%

 

 

66.50

%

Wolfbone Investments LLC, and entity controlled by Gregory McCabe, Chairman

 

 

18.75

%

 

 

25.00

%

Conversion by Note Holders in March, 2020

 

 

4.50

%

 

 

6.00

%

Unrelated Party

 

 

1.88

%

 

 

2.50

%

 

 

 

100.00

%

 

 

100.00

%

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.OIL & GAS PROPERTIES - continued

 

Hazel Project in the Midland Basin in West Texas

Effective April 4, 2016, TEIa wholly owned subsidiary of Torchlight acquired from MPC a 66.66%66.66% working interest in approximately 12,000 acres in the Midland Basin. A back-in after payout of a 25%25% working interest was retained by MPC and another unrelated working interest owner.

In October 2016, the holders of all of our then-outstandingTorchlight's outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock (which were issued in July 2016) elected to convert into a total 33.33%33.33% working interest in ourthe Hazel Project, reducing ourTorchlight ownership from 66.66%66.66% to a 33.33%33.33% working interest.

Acquisition of Additional Interests in Hazel Project

On January 30, 2017, weTorchlight entered into and closed an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and a Plan of Merger with an entity which was wholly-owned by Mr. McCabe, which resulted in the acquisition of approximately 40.66%40.66% working interest in the 12,000 gross acres, 9,600 net acres, in the Hazel Project.

Also, on January 30, 2017, the Company entered into and closed a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Wolfbone. Under the agreement, weTorchlight acquired certain of Wolfbone’s Hazel Project assets, including its interest in the Flying B Ranch #1 well and the 40 acre unit surrounding the well.

Upon the closing of the transactions, ourTorchlight's working interest in the Hazel Project increased by 40.66%40.66% to a total ownership of 74%74%.

Effective June 1, 2017, weTorchlight acquired an additional 6%6% working interest from unrelated working interest owners increasing ourits working interest in the Hazel project to 80%80%, and an overall net revenue interest of 74-75%74-75%.

The Company has drilled six6 test wells on the Hazel Project to capture and document the scientific base in support of demonstrating the production potential of the property.

Lease Modifications

In May 2019 we entered into agreements with two of the three mineral owners on the northern section of the leases to keep the entire acreage block as one lease with a one-year extension. We issued each of them 50,000 shares of our common stock as consideration for this extension. As of December 31, 2020, we have structured the extension agreement retroactively with the third mineral owner for cash consideration. Due to this extension, our obligation for 2019 reduced to one obligation well. We finished that obligation well targeting a shallow zone that showed oil potential. For the remainder of 2020 the Company must drill one well in June and two wells by the December 31, 2020. Development of the June well was initiated during June 2020. The December obligation was met under the terms of the Option Agreement. See below.

Option Agreement with Masterson Hazel Partners, LP

On August 13, 2020, ourTorchlight's subsidiaries Torchlight Energy, Inc. and Torchlight Hazel, LLC (collectively, “Torchlight”) entered into an option agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with Masterson Hazel Partners, LP (“MHP”) and McCabe Petroleum Corporation. Under the agreement, MHP was obligated to drill and complete, or cause to be drilled and completed, at its sole cost and expense, a new lateral well (the “Well”) on ourthe Hazel Project, sufficient to satisfy Torchlight’s continuous development obligations on the southern half of the prospect no later than September 30, 2020. MHP has satisfied this drilling obligation. MHP paid to Torchlight $1,000$1,000 as an option

55


fee at the time of execution of the Option Agreement. MHP is entitled to receive, as its sole recourse for the recoupment of drilling costs, the revenue from production of the Well attributable to Torchlight’s interest until such time as it has recovered its reasonable costs and expenses for drilling, completing, and operating the well.

In exchange for MHP satisfying the above drilling obligations, Torchlight granted to MHP the exclusive right and option to perform operations, at MHP’s sole cost and expense, on the Hazel Project sufficient to satisfy Torchlight’s continuous development obligations on the northern half of the prospect. Because MHP exercised this drilling option and satisfied the continuous development obligations on the northern half of the prospect, under the terms of the Option Agreement (as amended in September 2020) MHP now hashad the option to purchase the entire Hazel Project no later than May 31, 2021. Such purchase would be2021 under the terms of a form of Purchase and Sale Agreement included as an exhibit to the Option Agreement, at an aggregate purchase price of $12,690,704$12,690,704 for approximately 9,762 net mineral acres, and not less than 74%74% net revenue interest (approximately $1,300$1,300 per net mineral acre)..The option expired unexercised.

In the event MHP exercises its option to purchase the entire Hazel Project, McCabe Petroleum Corporation, which is owned by our chairman Gregory McCabe, has agreed to reduce its reversionary interest in the Hazel Project from 20% to not more than 12.5%.

52

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

4.OIL & GAS PROPERTIES - continued

Winkler Project, Winkler County, Texas

On December 1, 2017, an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization was entered into with MPC and Warwink Properties, LLC (“Warwink Properties”) to acquire certain assets, including a 10.71875% working interest in approximately 640 acres in Winkler County, Texas. Also, on December 1, 2017, MPC closed its transaction with MECO IV, LLC (“MECO”), for the purchase and sale of certain assets.

Also, on December 1, 2017, the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement that TEI entered into with MPC closed. Under the Purchase Agreement TEI acquired beneficial ownership of certain of MPC’s assets, including acreage and wellbores located in Ward County, Texas (the “Ward County Assets”).

Addition to the Winkler Project

As of May 7, 2018 our Winkler project in the Delaware Basin had begun the drilling phase of the first Winkler Project well, the UL 21 War-Wink 47 #2H. Additional acreage was leased by our operating partner under the Area of Mutual Interest Agreement (AMI) and we exercised its right to participate for its 12.5% in the additional 1,080 gross acres. Our carried interest in the first well was applied to this new well and allowed MECO to drill and produce potential revenues sooner than originally planned. The primary leasehold is a 320-acre block and allows for 5,000-foot lateral wells to be drilled.

In August 2020, the Company transferred a group of marginal unproductive wells (acquired as part of the original Winkler transaction) to the Operator of the properties in exchange for a $7,000 credit against the outstanding account payable due to the Operator. No gain or loss was recognized on the transaction.

On November 11, 2020 (effective November 1, 2020), the Company and MPC sold their entire interest in the Winkler project for a total purchase price of $450,000, with $100,000 allocated to MPC and $350,000 allocated to the Company. In connection with this transaction, MPC agreed to have its $100,000 portion of the purchase price paid directly to the Company in exchange for the Company issuing MPC 313,480 shares of common stock.

Hunton Play, Central Oklahoma

Presently, we arethe Company is producing from one well in the Viking Area of Mutual Interest and one well in Prairie Grove. These assets were not included in the third party valuation given their nominal value.

6. Inventory

5.RELATED PARTY BALANCES

Inventory consists of photosensitive materials, lenses, laser protection film and finished eyewear, and is comprised of the following:

As of December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, related party payables were $98,805 and $45,000, respectively, due to our executive officers and directors. Accrued payroll was $1,213,779 and $996,176, respectively, consisting of accrued and unpaid compensation due to our executive officers.

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Raw materials

 

$

196,868

 

 

$

378,265

 

Supplies

 

 

8,886

 

 

 

14,414

 

Work in process

 

 

30,636

 

 

 

69,380

 

Finished goods

 

 

29,328

 

 

 

1,323

 

Total inventory

 

$

265,718

 

 

$

463,382

 

 

On September 18, 2020, McCabe Petroleum Corporation, an entity owned by Greg McCabe, Torchlight’s Chairman, provided a bridge loan to Torchlight for $1,500,000. See the description below under the subsection “Secured Convertible Promissory Note Issued in Third Quarter, 2020” in Note 9, which description is incorporated herein by reference. The Company evaluated the note for beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) and derivative accounting criteria and concluded that there was no BCF or derivative accounting treatment applicable. In addition, Mr. McCabe loaned the Company $100,000 on December 30, 2020. Both of these notes have been retired by conversion into common stock in 2021.

As of December 31, 2020, and 2019, the Company had a $92,320 and 61,693, respectively, for an account receivable due from McCabe Petroleum Corporation for amounts advanced related to the Orogrande development cost sharing agreement.

401(k) Plan

The Company has established a 401(k) Plancontract with a primary raw material supplier which is designed to be qualified under Section 401(k)outlines certain restrictions for use of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees are permitted to contribute to the 401(k) Plan within statutory and 401(k) Plan limits. The Company makes matching contributions the first 6% of employee contributions. The Company made matching contributions of $26,017 and $19,200 for the years endedassociated materials. Raw material inventory as at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.2021 includes $

Nil (2020 - $

53

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.0.3
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

6.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leasesmillion) that is restricted.

 

The Company is subjectexpensed $0.2 million of restricted raw materials inventory to a sublease agreement through Octoberresearch and development expense during the year ended December 31, 2021 for occupancy of its office premises which requires monthly rent payments of $3,512.(2020 - $0.2 million).

 

Legal MattersDuring the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $0.7 million (2020 - Nominal amount) of inventory in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

7. Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Prepaid expenses

 

$

1,262,112

 

 

$

227,425

 

Other current assets

 

 

683,044

 

 

 

134,466

 

Taxes receivable

 

 

1,506,211

 

 

 

152,312

 

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

$

3,451,367

 

 

$

514,203

 

56


8. Property, plant and equipment, net

Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

Useful life

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(years)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

N/A

 

$

469,317

 

 

$

 

Building

 

25

 

 

5,509,403

 

 

 

 

Computer equipment

 

3-5

 

 

262,320

 

 

 

163,856

 

Computer software

 

1

 

 

277,717

 

 

 

256,554

 

Manufacturing equipment

 

2-10

 

 

17,762,405

 

 

 

6,645,986

 

Office furniture

 

5-7

 

 

525,961

 

 

 

99,234

 

Leasehold improvements

 

2-5

 

 

236,251

 

 

 

 

Enterprise Resource Planning software

 

5

 

 

211,149

 

 

 

210,254

 

Assets under construction

 

N/A

 

 

8,872,695

 

 

 

424,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,127,218

 

 

 

7,800,277

 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment

 

 

 

 

(7,109,104

)

 

 

(5,039,106

)

 

 

 

 

$

27,018,114

 

 

$

2,761,171

 

Depreciation expense was $1.8 million and $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Impairment expense was $0.3 million and $Nil for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 respectively.

Land and building were acquired as part of the Nanotech acquisition.

Manufacturing equipment additions include $8.6 million of acquired equipment as part of the Nanotech acquisition, $1.4 million in purchased equipment for the Highfield Park facility in Nova Scotia, Canada and $1.2 million in equipment purchased for the NANOWEB® pilot scale production line in the facility in Pleasanton, California, USA.

Assets under construction include $5.4 million in costs related to ongoing construction work at the Highfield Park and Pleasanton facilities and $3.6 million of equipment in transit.

Property, plant and equipment is pledged as security under a General Security Agreement (a “GSA”) signed in favor of the Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) on July 14, 2014, which is related to the Company’s corporate bank account and credit card and includes all property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.

9. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangibles

Intangibles consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

Useful life

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

(years)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patents

 

5-10

 

$

7,839,182

 

 

$

6,954,657

 

Trademarks

 

N/A

 

 

132,636

 

 

 

72,804

 

Developed technology

 

20

 

 

14,931,377

 

 

 

 

Customer contract

 

5

 

 

10,253,983

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,157,178

 

 

 

7,027,461

 

Accumulated amortization and impairment

 

 

 

 

(4,185,354

)

 

 

(2,550,847

)

 

 

 

 

$

28,971,824

 

 

$

4,476,614

 

Amortization expense was $1.7 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Developed technology and customer contract additions represent the acquired intangibles as part of the Nanotech acquisition.

57


Goodwill

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $213.4 million in goodwill from the Torchlight RTO and $27.1 million in goodwill from the Nanotech acquisition.

The Company performs the annual impairment test for goodwill at year-end, by comparing the reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying amount, including goodwill, as of December 31, 2021, using the market approach to determine fair value. As the reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying amount, the Company determined that goodwill was not impaired. The key assumption used to calculate the recoverable amount of goodwill as of December 31, 2021 was the Company’s share price.

10. Unsecured convertible promissory notes

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Bridge loan
(a)

 

 

Torchlight
(b)

 

 

Total

 

 

Bridge loan
(a)

 

 

Torchlight
(b)

 

 

Total

 

Beginning balance

 

$

538,020

 

 

$

665,215

 

 

$

1,203,235

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

Issued

 

 

3,963,386

 

 

 

10,000,000

 

 

 

13,963,386

 

 

 

378,042

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

1,378,042

 

Interest accrued

 

 

17,804

 

 

 

329,965

 

 

 

347,769

 

 

 

2,698

 

 

 

12,701

 

 

 

15,399

 

Fair value loss (gain)

 

 

19,163,417

 

 

 

333,947

 

 

 

19,497,364

 

 

 

139,609

 

 

 

(354,839

)

 

 

(215,230

)

Unrealized fair value loss (gain) due to own credit risk

 

 

0

 

 

 

(5,554

)

 

 

(5,554

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

14,132

 

 

 

14,132

 

Unrealized foreign currency exchange gain

 

 

0

 

 

 

(258,480

)

 

 

(258,480

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(23,849

)

 

 

(23,849

)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

(26,262

)

 

 

257,544

 

 

 

231,282

 

 

 

17,671

 

 

 

17,070

 

 

 

34,741

 

Conversion to common stock

 

 

(23,656,365

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(23,656,365

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Elimination pursuant to Torchlight RTO (note 3)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(11,322,637

)

 

 

(11,322,637

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Ending balance

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

538,020

 

 

$

665,215

 

 

$

1,203,235

 

a) In November 2020, MMI entered into a commitment letter (the “Commitment Letter”) with a shareholder, pursuant to which the shareholder will provide up to CA$5,500,000 in debt financing (the “Bridge Loan”) to fund MMI’s continued operations while MMI worked toward completion of the Proposed Transaction with Torchlight. Pursuant to the Commitment Letter, MMI was able to draw up to CA$500,000 monthly beginning in November 2020. The Bridge Loan bore interest at the rate of 8% per annum, payable monthly in arrears. The principal amount and any accrued but unpaid interest was due and payable on the 10th business day after the closing of the Proposed Transaction, or on November 29, 2022, if the Transaction did not close before that date. At the option of the holder, the Bridge Loan, or any portion of the Bridge Loan and accrued but unpaid interest was convertible into MMI Common Stock at a conversion price of CA$0.50 per share, subject to customary adjustments. MMI had the option to repay the Bridge Loan in whole or in part, without penalty, at any time on or after March 28, 2021.

MMI elected to measure the financial instrument at fair value. MMI subsequently remeasured the instrument on December 31, 2020 and recorded fair value loss of $139,609 in the statements of operations. There was no change in instrument specific credit risk.

On February 16, 2021, the total Bridge Loan of $4,361,930 of principal and accrued interest was converted at CA$0.50 per share into 20,391,239 common shares, in accordance with the terms of the bridge financing. MMI has remeasured the instrument as of the conversion date and recognized a non-cash realized fair value loss of $19,163,417 and the full amount of $23,656,365 was reclassified into the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity.

b) On September 15, 2020, MMI entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent (the “LOI”) with Torchlight pursuant to which Torchlight loaned MMI three unsecured convertible promissory notes totaling $11,000,000. These Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes bore interest at 8% annually, with principal and interest due and payable on the maturity date. If MMI and Torchlight had not entered into a Definitive Agreement, or the Definitive Agreement were terminated, then the Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes and all accrued and unpaid interest were convertible at the option of the holder into common stock of the Company at the conversion prices set out

58


below. The Company had the option to repay all or part of the Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, without penalty on or after 120 days from the note issuance date.

 

 

Tranche 1

 

 

Tranche 2

 

 

Tranche 3

 

Face value of notes issued

 

$

500,000

 

 

$

500,000

 

 

$

10,000,000

 

Issuance date

 

September 20, 2020

 

 

December 16, 2020

 

 

February 18, 2021

 

Maturity date

 

September 20, 2022

 

 

December 16, 2022

 

 

February 18, 2022

 

Interest rate

 

8%

 

 

8%

 

 

8%

 

Conversion price

 

CA$0.35

 

 

CA$0.62

 

 

CA$2.80

 

The conversion option was a foreign currency embedded derivative as the note was denominated in USD and the conversion price was in Canadian dollars. MMI elected to measure the financial instrument at fair value. MMI subsequently remeasured the instrument on March 31, 2021, and recorded fair value gain of $197,527, of which $5,554 was a gain recorded in other comprehensive income relating to instrument specific credit risk and $191,973 was a gain recorded in the statements of operations.

59


As part of the closing of the Arrangement, the promissory notes were remeasured at fair value and a fair value loss of $525,920 was recorded in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The notes were considered part of the consideration transferred (see note 3) and were eliminated upon acquisition and subsequent consolidation. In addition, the related accumulated fair value losses in OCI of $9,011 were recycled to the statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

11. Secured convertible debentures

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Beginning balance

 

$

5,545,470

 

 

$

 

Issued

 

 

 

 

 

3,630,019

 

Interest accrued

 

 

121,860

 

 

 

508,757

 

Interest paid

 

 

(64,528

)

 

 

(285,154

)

Fair value loss

 

 

16,408,482

 

 

 

511,699

 

Fair value loss—own credit

 

 

 

 

 

865,280

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

107,498

 

 

 

314,869

 

Conversion to common stock

 

 

(22,118,782

)

 

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

 

 

$

5,545,470

 

On April 3, 2020, MMI issued CA$5,000,000 in Secured Debentures to BDC Capital Inc.(“BDC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Business Development Bank of Canada. The Secured Debentures mature on October 31, 2024, and bear interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum, payable monthly in cash. In addition to the cash interest, the Secured Debentures accrued a non-compounding payment in kind (“PIK”) of 8% per annum. The PIK may be reduced by up to 3% (reduced to as low as 5% per annum) upon meeting certain conditions. BDC may elect to have the PIK paid in cash.

The Secured Debentures and the PIK are convertible in full or in part, at BDC’s option, into MMI common stock at any time prior to their maturity at a conversion price of CA$0.70 (the “Conversion Price”) or MMI may force the conversion of Secured Debentures if MMI’s common stock are trading on the CSE on a volume-weighted average price greater than 100% of the Conversion Price (i.e. greater than CA$1.40) for any 20 consecutive trading days with a minimum daily volume of at least 100,000 Common Stock.

MMI elected to measure the financial instrument at fair value. MMI subsequently remeasured the instrument on December 31, 2020, and recorded a fair value loss of $1,376,979, of which $511,699 was recorded in other comprehensive income relating to instrument specific credit risk and $865,280 was recorded in the statements of operations.

The secured debentures were subject to a covenant clause, whereby MMI was required to maintain a working capital ratio of no less than 3:1. The working capital ratio excluded deferred revenue and deferred government assistance from current liabilities. MMI did not fulfil the ratio as required in the contract and consequently, the secured debentures were reclassified as a current liability as at December 31, 2020.

On March 3, 2021, MMI forced the conversion of the Secured Debentures pursuant to the terms of the agreement with BDC. The total debentures balance of $3,910,954 was converted at CA$0.70 per share into 14,155,831 common shares. MMI remeasured the liability as of the conversion date and recognized a non-cash realized fair value loss of $16,408,482 and the full amount of $22,118,782 was reclassified into the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity. All security interests held by BDC on assets of MMI were immediately discharged.

In addition, the accumulated losses in OCI of $511,699 were recycled to the statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

60


12. Unsecured convertible debentures

Unsecured convertible debentures (the “Unsecured Debentures”) consist of the following:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Beginning balance

 

$

1,825,389

 

 

$

585,267

 

Issued

 

 

 

 

 

693,784

 

Interest accrued

 

 

23,660

 

 

 

147,304

 

Fair value loss

 

 

3,914,931

 

 

 

189,708

 

Fair value loss due to own credit risk

 

 

 

 

 

154,347

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

 

5,495

 

 

 

54,979

 

Conversion to common stock

 

 

(5,769,475

)

 

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

 

 

$

1,825,389

 

On December 10, 2019, an agreement was signed to convert an existing CA$250,000 short-term loan into an Unsecured Debenture, and also during December 2019, MMI issued an additional CA$500,000 in Unsecured Debentures to the same investor, under the same terms.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, MMI issued an additional CA$950,000 (US $693,784) in Unsecured Debentures to individuals and companies under the same terms as previous issues.

The Unsecured Debentures bear interest at a fixed rate of 1% per month, compounding monthly and have a maturity date of April 30, 2025. Each Unsecured Debenture is convertible at the option of the holder into MMI common stock at a price of CA$0.70 per share. Following completion of the RTO, MMI may elect to repay the outstanding amounts owing under the Unsecured Debentures in cash or in stock at a conversion price of CA$0.70 upon meeting certain conditions or the holder can convert the Unsecured Debentures at CA$0.70 or the Unsecured Debentures can be converted at maturity at the greater of 80% of the 10 day volume-weighted average price of the Resulting Issuer’s common stock or the closing price on the preceding trading day less the maximum permitted discount by the exchange.

MMI elected to measure the financial instrument at fair value. MMI subsequently remeasured the instrument on December 31, 2020 and recorded a fair value loss of $344,055, of which $154,347 was recorded in other comprehensive income relating to instrument specific credit risk and $189,708 was recorded in the statements of operations.

On February 16, 2021, MMI converted $1,439,103 of principal and accrued interest of Unsecured Debentures at CA$0.70 per share into 5,105,338 common shares in accordance with the terms of their debt instruments. MMI remeasured the liability as of the conversion date and recognized a non-cash realized fair value loss of $3,914,931 and the full amount of $5,769,475 was reclassified into the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity.

In addition, the accumulated losses in OCI of $154,347 were recycled to the statements of operations.

61


13. Long-term debt

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

'ACOA Business Development Program (“BDP”) 2012 interest-free loan1 with a maximum contribution of CA$500,000, repayable in monthly  repayments commencing October 1, 2015 of CA$5,952 until June 1, 2023. Loan repayments were temporarily paused effective April 1, 2020 until January 1, 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. As at December 31, 2021, the amount of principle drawn down on the loan, net of repayments, is CA$107,143 (2020 - CA$178,571).

 

$

80,390

 

 

$

129,384

 

'ACOA Atlantic Innovation Fund (“AIF”) 2015 interest-free loan1,2  with a maximum contribution of CA$3,000,000. Annual repayments, commencing June 1, 2021, are calculated as a percentage of gross revenue for the preceding fiscal year, at NaN when gross revenues are less than CA$1,000,000, 5% when gross revenues are less than CA$10,000,000 and greater than CA$1,000,000, and CA$500,000 plus 1% of gross revenues when gross revenues are greater than CA$10,000,000. As at December 31, 2021, the amount or principle drawn down on the loan, net of repayments, is CA$2,924,615 (2020 - CA$3,000,000).

 

 

1,666,764

 

 

 

1,458,954

 

ACOA BDP 2018 interest-free loan1,3 with a maximum contribution of CA$3,000,000, repayable in monthly repayments commencing June 1, 2021 of CA$31,250 until May 1, 2029. As at December 31, 2021, the amount of principle drawn down on the loan, net of repayments, is CA$2,781,250 (2020 - CA$3,000,000).

 

 

1,319,130

 

 

 

1,285,307

 

ACOA BDP 2019 interest-free loan1 with a maximum contribution of CA$100,000, repayable in monthly repayments commencing June 1, 2021 of CA$1,400 until May 1, 2027. As at December 31, 2021, the amount of principle drawn down on the loan, net of repayments, is CA$90,278 (2020 - CA$62,165).

 

 

42,011

 

 

 

30,138

 

ACOA Regional Relief and Recovery Fund (“RRRF”) 2020 interest-free loan with a maximum contribution of CA$390,000, repayable on monthly repayments commencing April 1, 2023 of CA$11,000 until April 1, 2026. As at December 31, 2021, the amount of principle drawn down on the loan is CA$390,000 (2020 - $NaN).

 

 

120,154

 

 

 

 

CAIXA Capital loan bearing interest at 6-month EURIBOR rate plus 4% interest spread. The loan principal and interest are fully repayable on January 15, 2025. On March 12, 2021, the principal loan balance with outstanding interest totaling $209,506 (EUR 171,080) was converted into MMI common stock at $3.87 per share4. Pursuant to the conversion, CAIXA Capital was issued 67,597 MMI common shares.

 

 

 

 

 

130,265

 

 

 

 

3,228,449

 

 

 

3,034,048

 

Less: current portion

 

 

491,278

 

 

 

290,544

 

 

 

$

2,737,171

 

 

$

2,743,504

 

1 The Company was required to maintain a minimum balance of positive equity throughout the term of the loan. However, on November 14, 2019, ACOA waived this requirement for the period ending June 30, 2019 and for each period thereafter until the loan is fully repaid.

2 The carrying amount of the ACOA AIF loan is reviewed each reporting period and adjusted as required to reflect management’s best estimate of future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate.

3 A portion of the ACOA BDP 2018 loan was used to finance the acquisition and construction of manufacturing equipment resulting in $425,872 was recorded as deferred government assistance, which is being amortized over the useful life of the associated equipment. The Company recorded the amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 of $145,739 (year ended December 31, 2020—$136,320) as government assistance in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

4 MMI has recognized the common stock issued in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity at fair value at time of conversion to be $221,842 and recorded the difference of $88,763 between the fair value of the common stock and the carrying value of the long-term debt as loss on debt settlement in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

62


14. Capital stock

Common stock

Authorized: 1,000,000,000 common shares, $0.001 par value.

All references to numbers of common shares and amounts in the consolidated statements of changes in stockholder’s equity and in the notes to the consolidated financial statements have been retroactively restated to reflect as if the CPM RTO and the Torchlight RTO had taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.

The numbers of common shares issued pre-CPM RTO have been multiplied by the 2.75 CPM conversion ratio and the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio.
The numbers of common shares issued post-CPM RTO have been multiplied by the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio.
The amounts of common shares issued pre-CPM RTO were calculated by multiplying the number of shares by 0.001, the 2.75 CPM conversion ratio and the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio and the difference was recognized in additional paid in capital.
The amounts of common shares issued post-CPM RTO were calculated by multiplying the number of shares by 0.001 and the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio and the difference were recognized in additional paid in capital.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company converted unsecured convertible promissory notes of $23,656,365, secured convertible debentures of $22,118,782, and unsecured convertible debentures of $5,769,475 into common stock. The Company remeasured the financial liabilities at fair value as of respective conversion dates and recognized a non-cash realized loss of $39,486,830. The Company subsequently reclassified the remeasured liabilities into equity and recognized $39,652 in common stock and $51,504,970 in additional paid in capital. The number of shares issued was calculated as the total outstanding principal and interest of each liability divided by the conversion price stated in each respective instrument’s agreement.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company converted long-term debt of $221,843 and due to related party of $225,986 into common stock. The Company recorded the common stock issued at fair value using the Company’s share price at the time of conversion. The Company recognized $276 in common stock and $447,553 in additional paid in capital. The resulting net loss calculated as the difference between the fair value of common stock and the carrying value of the liabilities of $19,330 was recorded in other income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The number of shares issued was calculated as the total outstanding principal and interest of each liability multiplied by the agreed upon conversion price.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 286,292 common shares at CA$0.58 per share as compensation in exchange for a fairness opinion obtained with respect to the Torchlight RTO. The company paid CA $90,000 in cash in 2020 and agreed to settle the remaining CA $90,000 in common stock. The Company recognized the share-based payment in trade and other payables in 2020 until the shares were issued in 2021.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, and pursuant to the Torchlight RTO, the Company recognized $369,631,002 in equity as the fair value of 82,813,994 common shares that were deemed to have been issued to Torchlight as part of the Torchlight RTO (note 3).

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 148,368 common shares as stock-based compensation at $3.37 per share to a service provider. The total amount of $500,000 was recorded as prepaid expenses and is being amortized over the period of service.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 125,000 common shares as stock-based compensation at $5.27 per share for a total of $658,750 as partial compensation for a fairness opinion obtained with respect to the Nanotech acquisition. The company paid the remaining $511,406 in cash.

During the year ended December 31, 2020 and pursuant to the CPM RTO, all preferred shares were converted into 58,153,368 common shares.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the aggregate principal of the Secured Promissory Notes and all interest accrued up until January 28, 2020 were converted into 17,752,163 common shares.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, and pursuant to the CPM RTO, the Company recognized $3,214,502 in equity as the fair value of 21,599,223 common shares that were deemed to have been issued to CPM as part of the CPM RTO.

63


At-the-Market Equity Offering Program ("ATM")

On June 16, 2021, Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. ("Torchlight”) entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Roth Capital Partners, LLC (the “Agent”) to conduct an “at-the-market” equity offering program pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell, from time to time at its sole discretion, shares (the "Placement Shares”) of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, having an aggregate offering price of up to $100,000,000 (the “Shares”), through or to the Agent, as the Company’s sales agent. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Sales Agreement, the Agent will use its commercially reasonable efforts to sell the Shares from time to time, based upon the Company’s instructions. The Company has no obligation to sell any of the Shares, and may, at any time, suspend the sale of the Shares under the Sales Agreement upon proper notice to the other party. The Sales Agreement will terminate upon the issuance and sale of all of the Shares through or to the Agent, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms.

On June 21, 2021, the Sales Agreement was amended and restated to increase the aggregate offering price to up to $250,000,000.

The Company has provided the Agent with customary indemnification rights, and the Agent will be entitled to an aggregate fixed commission of 3.0% of the gross proceeds from Shares sold through the Agent under the Sales Agreement. Sales of the Shares under the Sales Agreement will be made in transactions that are deemed to be “at-the-market offerings” as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including sales made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions, including on The NASDAQ Capital Market, at market prices or as otherwise agreed to with the Agent.

The Shares have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-256632) filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 28, 2021, and declared effective on June 14, 2021 (the “Registration Statement”). The Company has prepared a prospectus supplement dated June 16, 2021 and a prospectus supplement dated June 21, 2021 specifically relating to the Placement Shares to the base prospectus included as part of such registration statement.

During the period from June 16, 2021 to June 25, 2021 and prior to the Torchlight RTO, Torchlight sold a total of 16,185,805 shares of common stock under the ATM for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $137.5 million. There was 0 sale of common stock under the ATM after June 28, 2021.

Warrants

Prior to completion of the CPM RTO on March 5, 2020, every two warrants had the right to purchase 1 MTI common share for CA$2.475 per share.

Pursuant to the completion of the RTO on March 5, 2020, MTI warrants were adjusted such that one warrant has the right to purchase 1 MMI Common Share for CA$0.90 per share.

On June 28, 2021 and pursuant to the completion of Torchlight RTO, each MMI warrant was converted into 1.845 META warrants and the exercise price was updated to be CA$0.49. Also, as part of the Torchlight RTO, Torchlight outstanding warrants of 853,278 underwent a reverse stock split at a ratio of 2:1 resulting in warrants of 430,380 and for an amount being recorded at $2,773,779 in additional paid in capital as part of the consideration transferred.

64


The following table summarizes the changes in warrants of the Company:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

 

warrants 1

 

 

Amount 1

 

 

warrants 1

 

 

Amount 1

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

 

3,046,730

 

 

$

402,883

 

 

 

1,590,866

 

 

$

132,299

 

Issued

 

 

2,153,500

 

 

 

3,831,124

 

 

 

1,455,864

 

 

 

166,916

 

Adjustment to 2019 warrants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

103,668

 

Exercised

 

 

(365,651

)

 

 

(49,812

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of deemed issuance to Torchlight

 

 

430,380

 

 

 

2,773,779

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

 

 

5,264,959

 

 

$

6,957,974

 

 

 

3,046,730

 

 

$

402,883

 

1 All references to numbers of warrants have been retroactively restated to reflect as if Torchlight RTO had taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. The numbers of warrants issued pre-CPM RTO have been divided by 2, multiplied by the 2.75 CPM conversion ratio and the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio. There were no warrants issued post CPM RTO except for Torchlight warrants.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company granted 2,153,500five-year warrants (year ended December 31, 2020 - 1,455,864) to purchase common stock to external consultants as stock-based compensation.

The fair value of 1,153,500 warrants issued during the year ended December 31, 2021 was estimated to be $3,129,208 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The total amount has been recorded in General & Administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The fair value of 1,000,000 warrants issued during the year ended December 31, 2021 was estimated to be $701,910 using the Monte Carlo Simulation model. The total amount has been recorded in General & Administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, 365,651 warrants were exercised to purchase 361,729 common shares where a warrant holder elected a cashless exercise and consequently, the difference of 3,922 shares was withheld to cover the exercise cost.

Broker warrants

Prior to completion of the CPM RTO on March 5, 2020, every MTI broker warrant had the right to purchase 1 MTI common share for CA$1.70 per share.

Pursuant to the completion of the RTO on March 5, 2020, each MTI broker warrant was converted into 1.845 MMI warrants, and the exercise price was updated to be CA$0.62.

On June 28, 2021, and pursuant to the completion of the Torchlight RTO, each MMI warrant was converted into 1.845 META warrants and the exercise price was updated to be CA$0.34.

The following table summarizes the changes in broker warrants of the Company:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

 

 

 

warrants 1

 

 

Amount 1

 

 

warrants 1

 

 

Amount 1

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

 

97,542

 

 

$

16,144

 

 

 

 

 

$

 

Issued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97,542

 

 

 

16,144

 

Exercised

 

 

(83,655

)

 

 

(14,318

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of year

 

 

13,887

 

 

$

1,826

 

 

 

97,542

 

 

$

16,144

 

1 All references to numbers of broker warrants have been retroactively restated to reflect the number of stock of the legal parent (accounting acquiree) issuable following the reverse acquisition. The numbers of broker warrants issued pre-CPM RTO have been multiplied by the 2.75 CPM conversion ratio and the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio. There were no broker warrants issued post CPM RTO.

65


During the year ended December 31, 2021, 83,655 warrants were exercised to purchase 82,494 common shares where a warrant holder elected a cashless exercise and consequently, the difference of 1,161 shares was withheld to cover the exercise cost.

The fair value of warrants and broker warrants that were issued and estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model have the following inputs and assumptions:

 

 

Year ended

 

Year ended

 

 

 

December 31, 2021

 

December 31, 2020

 

Risk free interest rate

 

0.45% - 0.98%

 

0.80% - 1.43%

 

Expected volatility

 

92%

 

134%

 

Expected dividend yield

 

0%

 

0%

 

Expected forfeiture rate

 

0%

 

0%

 

Common stock price

 

5.31

 

 

1.70

 

Exercise price per common stock

 

$0.85 - $4.50

 

$1.70 - $2.475

 

Expected term of warrants

 

2.20 - 5 years

 

2 years

 

The fair value of warrants that were issued and estimated using the Monte Carlo Simulation have the following inputs and assumptions:

Year ended

December 31, 2021

Risk free interest rate

0.42%

Weighted average expected volatility

80%

Expected term of warrants

5 years

15. Stock-based payments

On December 3, 2021, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan to utilize the 3,500,000 shares reserved and unissued under the Torchlight 2015 Stock Option and Grant Plan and the 6,445,745 shares reserved and unissued under the MMI 2018 Stock Option and Grant plan to set the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan at 34,945,745 shares.

The 2021 Equity Incentive Plan allows the grants of non-statutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), stock appreciation rights, performance units and performance shares to employees, directors, and consultants.

DSU Plan

Each unit is convertible at the option of the holder into one common share of the Company.

On March 28, 2013, the Company implemented a Deferred Stock Unit (DSU) Plan for its directors, employees and officers. Directors, employees and officers are granted DSUs of the Company with immediate vesting as a form of compensation. Each unit is convertible at the option of the holder into one common share of the Company. Eligible individuals are entitled to receive all DSUs (including dividends and other adjustments) no later than December 1st of the first calendar year commencing after the time of termination of their services.

On December 22, 2021, the Company granted 191,802 DSUs to directors of the Company with immediate vesting. The Company recognized an expense of $517,869 in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss based on grant date fair value of $2.70.

The following table summarizes the change in outstanding DSUs of the Company:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Outstanding, beginning of year

 

 

3,455,224

 

 

 

3,977,820

 

Issued

 

 

491,802

 

 

 

0

 

Converted into common stock

 

 

0

 

 

 

(522,596

)

Outstanding, end of year

 

 

3,947,026

 

 

 

3,455,224

 

66


Information concerning units outstanding is as follows:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Issue price

 

Number of units

 

 

Number of units

 

CA$0.27

 

 

3,348,675

 

 

 

3,348,675

 

CA$0.51

 

 

106,549

 

 

 

106,549

 

US$2.70

 

 

491,802

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

3,947,026

 

 

 

3,455,224

 

1 All references to numbers of DSUs have been retroactively restated to reflect as if the Torchlight RTO had taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. The numbers of DSUs issued pre-CPM RTO have been multiplied by the 2.75 CPM conversion ratio and the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio.

RSU Plan

Each unit is convertible at the option of the holder into one common share of the Company upon meeting the vesting conditions.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company granted 300,000 RSUs to a consulting firm with vesting conditions satisfied in 2021. The Company recognized an expense of $1,928,000 in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss based on weighted average grant date fair value of $6.43/unit.

As of December 31, 2021, there was $NaN unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs.

67


Employee Stock Option Plan

Each stock option is convertible at the option of the holder into one common share of the Company.

The Company has an Employee Stock Option Plan [the “Plan”] for directors, officers, and employees. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, 25% of the options shall vest and become exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant date and 75% of the options issuable under the Plan shall vest and become exercisable in equal monthly installments over the three-year period commencing immediately after the first anniversary of the grant date. The option exercise price will not be less than the fair market value of a share on the grant date, as determined by the Board of Directors, taking into account any considerations which it determines to be appropriate at the relevant time. The contractual term of the stock options is 10 years and there are 0 cash settlement alternatives for the employees.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company’s existing MTI options were converted at a ratio of 2.75 MMI options for each MTI option pursuant to the CPM RTO. Also, as part of the CPM RTO, 1,291,500 stock options were issued to executives and directors of CPM. Additionally, and subsequent to the completion of the CPM RTO, the Company granted 13,402,080 options to employees and directors, 898,515 of which vested upon grant date and 12,503,565 of which vest over 1-4 years. Subsequent to the completion of the CPM RTO, 2,589,457 stock options were forfeited as a result of employee departures and 2,090,866 options expired unexercised.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company’s existing MMI options were converted at a ratio of 1.845 META options for each MMI option pursuant to the Torchlight RTO. Also, as part of the Torchlight RTO, Torchlight outstanding options of 3,000,000 underwent a reverse stock split at a ratio of 2:1 resulting in outstanding options of 1,500,000 and an amount of $9,397,988 was recorded in additional paid in capital as part of the consideration transferred.

Total stock-based compensation expense included in the consolidated statements of operations was as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Selling & Marketing

 

$

34,735

 

 

$

61,560

 

 

$

154,086

 

General & Administrative

 

 

544,530

 

 

 

1,114,556

 

 

 

940,613

 

Research & Development

 

 

479,715

 

 

 

333,570

 

 

 

198,073

 

 

 

$

1,058,980

 

 

$

1,509,686

 

 

$

1,292,772

 

The following table summarizes the change in outstanding stock options of the Company:

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

exercise

 

 

exercise

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

price per

 

 

remaining

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

Number of
options

 

 

stock
option

 

 

contractual
term
(years)

 

intrinsic
value

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2019

 

 

14,502,303

 

 

$

0.33

 

 

8.38

 

$

104,500

 

Issued to CPM executives and directors pursuant to CPM RTO

 

 

1,291,500

 

 

 

0.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

13,402,080

 

 

 

0.34

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(2,627,510

)

 

 

0.34

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

 

(2,090,866

)

 

 

0.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2020

 

 

24,477,507

 

 

$

0.33

 

 

8.36

 

$

688,952

 

Exercised

 

 

(4,486,965

)

 

 

0.36

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited

 

 

(85,901

)

 

 

0.34

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of deemed issuance to Torchlight

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

2.22

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2021

 

 

21,404,641

 

 

$

0.46

 

 

7.34

 

$

56,924,556

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable, December 31, 2021

 

 

13,231,030

 

 

$

0.54

 

 

6.74

 

$

34,148,435

 

68


Below is a summary of the outstanding options as at December 31, 2021:

Exercise price
$

 

Number outstanding

 

 

Number exercisable

 

CA$0.34

 

 

19,067,529

 

 

 

10,893,918

 

CA$0.15

 

 

518,112

 

 

 

518,112

 

CA$0.19

 

 

369,000

 

 

 

369,000

 

US$2.00

 

 

1,075,000

 

 

 

1,125,000

 

US$1.00

 

 

375,000

 

 

 

325,000

 

 

 

 

21,404,641

 

 

 

13,231,030

 

Below is a summary of the outstanding options as at December 31, 2020:

Exercise price

 

Number outstanding

 

 

Number exercisable

 

CA$0.34

 

 

23,550,394

 

 

 

9,636,758

 

CA$0.15

 

 

558,113

 

 

 

558,113

 

CA$0.19

 

 

369,000

 

 

 

369,000

 

 

 

 

24,477,507

 

 

 

10,563,871

 

1 All references to numbers of stock options have been retroactively restated to reflect as if the Torchlight RTO had taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. The numbers of stock options issued pre-CPM RTO have been multiplied by the 2.75 CPM conversion ratio and the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio. The numbers of stock options issued post CPM RTO have been multiplied by the 1.845 Torchlight conversion ratio.

The weighted average remaining contractual life for the stock options outstanding as at December 31, 2021 was 7.65 (December 31, 2020 – 8.36) years. There were 1,500,000 and 13,402,080 stock options granted with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $6.27 and $0.39 per share respectively during the year ended December 31, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020.

The fair value of options granted was estimated at the grant date using the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2021

 

2020

 

2019

Dividend yield [%]

 

 

 

Volatility

 

84%

 

52%-134%

 

84%-130%

Risk-free interest rate

 

0.73%

 

0.73%

 

1.21%

Expected term (in years)

 

1 year

 

7.48 years

 

8.67 years

The expected life of the stock options is based on historical data and current expectations and is not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur. The expected volatility reflects the assumption that the historical volatility over a period similar to the life of the options is indicative of future trends, which may not necessarily be the actual outcome.

69


16. Income taxes

Loss before income taxes was as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Local

 

$

(30,552,839

)

 

$

(1,549,534

)

 

$

(1,278,498

)

Foreign

 

 

(61,296,485

)

 

 

(10,255,435

)

 

 

(7,250,018

)

Loss before income taxes

 

$

(91,849,324

)

 

$

(11,804,969

)

 

$

(8,528,516

)

Income tax provision was as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Current tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local

 

$

800

 

 

$

800

 

 

$

800

 

Foreign

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        Current tax expense

 

 

800

 

 

 

800

 

 

 

800

 

Deferred tax benefit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign

 

 

(852,863

)

 

 

(194,510

)

 

 

(84,349

)

          Deferred tax benefit

 

 

(852,863

)

 

 

(194,510

)

 

 

(84,349

)

Income tax recovery

 

$

(852,063

)

 

$

(193,710

)

 

$

(83,549

)

The income tax provision differs from the amount computed by applying the federal income tax rate of 21% for 2021 (2020 - 21%) to the loss before income taxes as a result of the following differences:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Tax computed at federal statutory rate

 

$

(19,288,357

)

 

$

(2,479,044

)

 

$

(1,790,988

)

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

 

 

(1,075,114

)

 

 

(136,979

)

 

 

(113,019

)

Share-based compensation

 

 

2,289,214

 

 

 

317,034

 

 

 

285,287

 

Unrealized loss on FVTPL liabilities

 

 

11,752,697

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other permanent items

 

 

(114,799

)

 

 

104,181

 

 

 

145,204

 

Foreign currency and other

 

 

929,664

 

 

 

343,574

 

 

 

159,409

 

Impact of different tax rate in foreign jurisdiction

 

 

(4,889,797

)

 

 

(787,329

)

 

 

(644,394

)

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

9,544,429

 

 

 

2,444,853

 

 

 

1,874,952

 

Income tax recovery

 

$

(852,063

)

 

$

(193,710

)

 

$

(83,549

)

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

70


 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-capital losses

 

$

25,110,497

 

 

$

10,059,528

 

Intangible assets

 

 

69,964

 

 

 

62,938

 

Other assets

 

 

46,725

 

 

 

42,488

 

Research and development tax credits

 

 

1,972,694

 

 

 

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

 

 

27,199,880

 

 

 

10,164,954

 

Less: valuation allowance

 

 

(18,659,901

)

 

 

(9,115,472

)

 

 

 

8,539,979

 

 

 

1,049,482

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets

 

 

(6,276,390

)

 

 

(703,872

)

Property and equipment

 

 

(2,226,741

)

 

 

(281,092

)

Long-term debt

 

 

(251,646

)

 

 

(293,168

)

Funding obligation

 

 

(109,681

)

 

 

(35,404

)

Unsecured convertible promissory notes

 

 

 

 

 

(54,000

)

 

 

 

(8,864,458

)

 

 

(1,367,536

)

Net deferred tax liability

 

$

(324,479

)

 

$

(318,054

)

At December 31, 2021, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of approximately $91.3 million (2020: $34.7 million) that can be used to offset future taxable income, and such NOLs, as well as timing differences from certain financial instruments, result in a gross deferred tax asset of approximately $27.2 million (2020: $10.2 million). These NOLs begin to expire in 2028.

In evaluating its valuation allowance, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including projected future taxable income and recent financial performance. Due to uncertainty with respect to the ultimate realizability of these deferred tax assets, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance of approximately $18.7 million (2020: $9.1 million) against its deferred tax assets.

17. Net loss per share

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share during the periods presented:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(90,997,261

)

 

$

(11,611,259

)

 

$

(8,444,967

)

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares, basic

 

 

232,898,398

 

 

 

137,258,259

 

 

 

50,015,137

 

Weighted-average shares, diluted

 

 

232,898,398

 

 

 

137,258,259

 

 

 

50,015,137

 

Net loss per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

(0.39

)

 

 

(0.08

)

 

 

(0.17

)

Diluted

 

 

(0.39

)

 

 

(0.08

)

 

 

(0.17

)

The following potentially dilutive shares were not included in the calculation of diluted shares above as the effect would have been anti-dilutive:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Convertible debt

 

 

 

 

 

10,423,477

 

 

 

9,957,387

 

Options

 

 

21,404,641

 

 

 

24,477,507

 

 

 

7,860,328

 

Warrants

 

 

5,278,846

 

 

 

3,144,272

 

 

 

862,258

 

DSUs

 

 

3,947,026

 

 

 

3,947,026

 

 

 

1,872,750

 

 

 

 

30,630,513

 

 

 

41,992,282

 

 

 

20,552,723

 

71


18. Additional cash flow information

The net changes in operating assets and liabilities consist of the following:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Grants receivable

 

$

149,798

 

 

$

(131,318

)

 

$

16,243

 

Inventory

 

 

325,657

 

 

 

(109,986

)

 

 

(17,495

)

Accounts and other receivables

 

 

(880,613

)

 

 

58,891

 

 

 

(95,244

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

 

(2,100,371

)

 

 

(27,313

)

 

 

(124,555

)

Trade payables

 

 

6,906,376

 

 

 

(644,120

)

 

 

998,335

 

Due to related party

 

 

(78,940

)

 

 

(26,984

)

 

 

2,943

 

Operating lease Right-of-use Asset

 

 

1,018,691

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

(688,183

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,652,415

 

 

$

(880,830

)

 

$

780,227

 

19. Fair value measurements

The Company uses a fair value hierarchy, based on the relative objectivity of inputs used to measure fair value, with Level 1 representing inputs with the highest level of objectivity and Level 3 representing the lowest level of objectivity.

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short-term investments, grants and accounts receivables, due from (to) related parties and trade and other payables approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The current portion of long-term debt has been included in the below table.

The fair values of convertible promissory notes secured convertible debentures and unsecured convertible debentures are classified at level 3 as they were accounted for under the fair value option election of ASC 825 and the estimated fair value was computed using significant inputs that are not observable in the market.

The fair value of assets held for sale is classified at level 3 as the fair value of the O&G assets was estimated by obtaining a valuation study performed by a third party valuation firm. Refer to note 3 for the significant estimates and assumptions used by the Company in the determination of the fair value.

The fair value of the preferred stock liability is also classified as level 3 since the fair value measurement of the oil and natural gas properties forms the basis for the fair value measurement of the preferred stock liability as of June 28, 2021 and as of December 31, 2021.

The fair values of the funding obligation, operating lease liabilities, and long-term debt would be classified at Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, as each instrument is estimated based on unobservable inputs including discounted cash flows using the market rate, which is subject to similar risks and maturities with comparable financial instruments as at the reporting date.

Carrying values and fair values of financial instruments that are not carried at fair value are as follows:

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Financial liability

 

Carrying value

 

 

Fair value

 

 

Carrying value

 

 

Fair value

 

Funding obligation

 

$

268,976

 

 

$

170,338

 

 

$

776,884

 

 

$

571,839

 

Operating lease liabilities

 

 

4,370,635

 

 

 

6,149,369

 

 

 

270,581

 

 

 

270,641

 

Long-term debt

 

 

3,228,449

 

 

 

2,303,648

 

 

 

3,034,048

 

 

 

2,734,931

 

72


20. Revenue

The Company has 1 operating segment based on how management internally evaluates separate financial information, business activities and management responsibility.

Revenue is disaggregated as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Product sales

 

$

407,914

 

 

$

2,905

 

 

$

23,745

 

Contract revenue [1]

 

 

3,427,938

 

 

 

624,316

 

 

 

247,669

 

Other development revenue

 

 

246,665

 

 

 

494,962

 

 

 

630,996

 

Development revenue

 

 

3,674,603

 

 

 

1,119,278

 

 

 

878,665

 

 

 

$

4,082,517

 

 

$

1,122,183

 

 

$

902,410

 

1 Contract revenue represents previously recorded deferred revenue that was recognized as revenue after satisfaction of performance obligations either through passage of time or after completion of specific performance milestones. Refer to note 21 for outstanding contracts.

Customer concentration

A significant amount of the revenue is derived from contracts with major customers. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company had 3 customers that accounted for $3,307,914 or 81% of total revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company had 3 customers that accounted for $807,912 or 72% of total revenue.

Nanotech currently derives a significant portion of its revenue from contract services with a G10 central bank. In 2021, Nanotech entered into a development contract for up to $41.5 million over a period of up to five years. These contract services incorporate both nano-optic and optical thin film technologies and are focused on developing authentication features for future banknotes. During the year ended December 31, 2021, revenue recognized from this development contract represented 45% of the Company's total revenue.

Cooperation Framework Agreement

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company entered into a Cooperation Framework Agreement ("CFA") with Covestro Deutschland AG (“Covestro”) where Covestro is obligated to provide EUR 800,000 (US$987,577) of proceeds to the Company in exchange for a license to the Interglass patents and upon the completion of certain performance milestones. The Company has also entered into an agreement with Canton Zug in Switzerland for the acquisition of specialized lens casting production equipment and intellectual property ("Interglass assets") for US$800,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, and pursuant to receiving the required funds from Covestro, the Company acquired and recognized the Interglass assets in property, plant and equipment in the amount of $320,000 and intangibles in the amount of $480,000. The Company identified the performance obligations associated with the agreement as per ASC 606 Revenue Recognition and recognized the full amount of the contract as development revenue in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

73


21. Deferred revenue

Deferred revenue consists of the following:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Satair A/S-exclusive rights [1]

 

 

717,615

 

 

 

815,310

 

Satair A/S-advance against PO [2]

 

 

490,929

 

 

 

488,847

 

LM Aero-MetaSOLAR commercialization [3]

 

 

92,698

 

 

 

646,135

 

Breakthrough Starshot Foundation [4]

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

75,000

 

Innovate UK-R&D tax credit

 

 

18,588

 

 

 

18,778

 

Other deferred revenue

 

 

21,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,416,740

 

 

 

2,044,070

 

Less current portion

 

 

779,732

 

 

 

1,239,927

 

 

 

$

637,008

 

 

$

804,143

 

[1] On September 18, 2018, the Company signed an exclusive distribution agreement with Satair A/S for a term of 10 years. According to this agreement, the Company grants Satair A/S the exclusive right to sell, market, and distribute eyewear and visor products incorporating metamaterial-based laser protection technology that are developed or manufactured by the Company for use in aviation, military and defense. On September 13, 2018, the Company received a fee of $1,000,000 for the exclusive distribution rights granted under this agreement and the payment was recognized as deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheets. It will be accounted as development revenue over a period of 8 years and 0 repayment of the $1,000,000 is required if the contract termination is after the 8th anniversary of the effective date. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company has recognized $102,269 (2019: $98,292) as development revenue related to this agreement.

[2] On July 20, 2018, the Company received a purchase order for MetaVisor (eyewear/eye protection) from Satair A/S for $2,000,000. On November 7, 2018, the Company received a partial advance payment of $500,000 against this purchase order. The Company has set up a guarantee/standby letter of credit with RBC. In the event the Company fails to deliver the product as per the contract or refuse to accept the return of the product as per the buyback clause of the contract or fails to repay the advance payment in accordance with the conditions of the agreement signed with Satair on September 18, 2018, Satair shall draw from the letter of credit with RBC. As at December 31, 2021, 0 amount has been drawn from the letter of credit with RBC. Refer to note 28 for information regarding the letter of credit.

[3] On April 26, 2017, the Company received $4,150,000 from Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Corporation (“LM Aero”) in relation to the Offset Project Agreement (“OPA”). The purpose of the OPA was to document the agreement between LM Aero and the Company with respect to the Company’s planned growth through R&D and commercialization activities using the MetaSOLAR technology as well as the contribution that LM Aero made to the Company in return for the Company’s effective assistance in obtaining credit arising from the project as set forth in the OPA. The Company has set up an irrevocable standby letter of credit with RBC. In the event the Company fails to meet the obligations under the OPA, LM Aero shall draw from the letter of credit with RBC. The performance obligations for the milestone are satisfied through-out the period. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company has recognized $562,531 (2020: $526,109) as development revenue related to this agreement.

[4] On March 1, 2020, the Company entered into a research agreement with Breakthrough Starshot Foundation LLC under the project “Lightsail” for $150,000. The Company received $75,000 on March 6, 2020 which has been recorded as part of deferred revenue.

74


22. Deferred government assistance

a) Grants receivable

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

ACOA-PBS [1]

 

$

8,069

 

 

$

11,960

 

Co-Op wage subsidy [2]

 

 

7,318

 

 

 

31,400

 

Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy [3]

 

 

122,940

 

 

 

233,446

 

Innovate UK – Diabet [4]

 

 

13,790

 

 

 

51,062

 

NSBI - Export development program [5]

 

 

23,663

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

175,780

 

 

$

327,868

 

[1]

On November 21, 2018, ACOA approved two non-repayable contribution of $37,679 each to the Company under Business Development Program – Productivity and Business skills (“PBS”) for the cost to create product and commercialization strategies.

[2]

During 2021 and 2020, the Company applied for and received grants related to co-op students and recent graduates under the Nova Scotia Co-Op Subsidy, Graduate To Opportunity Program ("GTO") and Venture for Canada program ("VFC").

[3]

During 2021, the Company received the 2020 outstanding balance of $233,446 as well as recognized $443,494 government assistance from Canada Emergency Wage subsidy ("CEWS") as other income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, of which $321,547 has been received.

[4]

On February 13, 2019, Innovate UK approved a grant to MediWise for the project “Diabet – Innovate wrist device for high accuracy non-invasive blood glucose monitoring”. During 2021, the Company received $132,288 (2020: $139,940) in relation to the grant and recognized government assistance of $110,125 (2020: $130,734) as other income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

[5]

On December 15, 2021, the Company applied for NSBI - Export development program and recognized $23,663 as other income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

b) Deferred government assistance

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

SDTC [1]

 

$

846,612

 

 

$

779,579

 

Deferred government assistance

 

 

3,038

 

 

 

31,400

 

 

 

 

849,650

 

 

 

810,979

 

Less: current portion

 

 

846,612

 

 

 

779,578

 

 

 

$

1,696,262

 

 

$

1,590,557

 

[1]

On May 15, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with the Canada Foundation for Sustainable Development Technology Canada (“SDTC”) for $4,189,966. The contribution provides funding for eligible costs incurred relating to the further development and demonstration of technology related to solar cells in connection with the project entitled “Enabling solar flight a testing ground for lightweight and efficient solar panels”. On March 30, 2021, the Company has received an additional 5% contribution from SDTC of $223,409 (2020: $211,868). The Company has recognized $161,990 (2020: $639,505) as government assistance in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

75


c) Government assistance recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

SDTC

 

$

161,990

 

 

$

639,505

 

 

$

192,574

 

Payroll subsidies

 

 

741,322

 

 

 

831,148

 

 

 

690,434

 

Amortization of deferred government assistance

 

 

145,739

 

 

 

135,654

 

 

 

135,125

 

Fair value gain on initial recognition of ACOA loans

 

 

236,021

 

 

 

 

 

 

172,352

 

Scientific Research and Experimental Development ("SR&ED")

 

 

448,894

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other grants

 

 

 

 

 

23,807

 

 

 

41,290

 

 

 

$

1,733,966

 

 

$

1,630,114

 

 

$

1,231,775

 

23. Interest expense, net

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Non-cash interest accretion

 

$

(904,925

)

 

$

(1,052,478

)

 

$

(742,360

)

Interest & bank charges

 

 

(220,460

)

 

 

(394,330

)

 

 

(394,147

)

Interest income

 

 

18,940

 

 

 

16,854

 

 

 

585

 

 

 

$

(1,106,445

)

 

$

(1,429,954

)

 

$

(1,135,922

)

24. Loss on financial instruments, net

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Loss on secured convertible promissory notes

 

$

 

 

$

(5,234

)

 

$

(280,319

)

Loss on unsecured convertible promissory notes – Bridge loan

 

 

(19,163,417

)

 

 

(139,610

)

 

 

 

(Loss) Gain on unsecured convertible promissory notes – Torchlight notes

 

 

(343,197

)

 

 

354,840

 

 

 

 

Loss on secured convertible debentures

 

 

(16,957,029

)

 

 

(865,280

)

 

 

 

Loss on unsecured convertible debentures

 

 

(4,076,448

)

 

 

(189,709

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

(40,540,091

)

 

$

(844,993

)

 

$

(280,319

)

The net gain/loss on financial instruments for the years ending December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 represent non-cash gains/losses resulting from remeasurement of the fair value of convertible financial liabilities at each balance sheet date or on conversion date using the fair value option.

Each of the above referenced promissory notes and debentures included a conversion feature, exercisable at the option of the debt holder. For accounting purposes, each of these conversion features is an embedded derivative in the note or debenture. The Company elected to account for fluctuations in (a) the value of the liabilities driven by interest rate volatility and the Company’s credit risk and (b) the embedded derivatives driven by fluctuations in the Company’s common stock share price using a method known as Fair Value option. This accounting method calls for the Company to measure the fair value of the convertible financial liabilities at each balance sheet date and to record any fluctuations in the values that as non-cash adjustments relating to instrument specific credit risk in the other comprehensive income and non-cash adjustments relating to other factors in the statements of operations. If, as in the case of the liabilities described above, the debt is converted, the valuations and any adjustments are to be recorded as of the date of such conversion.

The Fair Value option also provides that the total revaluation adjustment be recorded in Common Stock and additional paid in capital thus having no impact on stockholders' equity despite the recording of the loss in the statement of operations.

76


25. Other (loss) income, net

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 O&G assets maintenance cost [1]

 

$

(14,155,851

)

 

$

 

 

$

 

 Government Assistance (note 22)

 

 

1,733,966

 

 

 

1,630,114

 

 

 

1,231,775

 

 Other income

 

 

8,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

401,186

 

 Fair value gain (loss) on long-term debt

 

 

2,278

 

 

 

(106,635

)

 

 

448,437

 

 Fair value gain (loss) on funding obligation (note 26)

 

 

471,689

 

 

 

(32,291

)

 

 

 

 

 

$

(11,939,068

)

 

$

1,491,188

 

 

$

2,081,398

 

[1]

The Company incurred costs of $14.2 million in relation to certain drilling activity carried out at its Oil and Gas properties, to remain in compliance with all aspects of the Company's lease obligations and to satisfy the Continuous Drilling Clause ("CDC") with University Lands.

26. Funding obligation

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

Outstanding obligation [1]

 

$

1,025,398

 

 

$

1,021,050

 

Fair value of interest-free component [2]

 

 

(855,060

)

 

 

(384,056

)

Principal adjusted for interest-free component

 

 

170,338

 

 

 

636,994

 

Accumulated non-cash interest accretion

 

 

98,638

 

 

 

139,890

 

Carrying amount

 

 

268,976

 

 

 

776,884

 

Less current portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

268,976

 

 

$

776,884

 

[1]

In June 2019, the Company entered into a statement of work (“SOW”) with a third party for the purchase of manufacturing equipment. The SOW was initiated based on the Industrial and Regional Benefits general investment funding between the third party and the Government of Canada. The Company received the funds in 2 tranches after achieving 2 milestones as per the SOW. The funds are repayable, commencing three years from date of receipt, based on 10% of revenue from the sale of holographic film that is produced using the related manufacturing equipment paid for under this funding obligation.

In June 2019, the Company achieved the first milestone and received CA$325,000 and in October 2019, the Company achieved the second milestone and received CA$975,000. The Company has not sold holographic film related to this SOW to date.

[2]

The amounts received under the agreement have been recorded at fair value by applying the effective interest rate method on the dates the funding was received, using an estimated market interest rate of 15%. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized $401,186 as other income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. In the year ended 2020, the Company recognized a loss of $32,291 resulting from changes in repayment period of the obligation. The gain was recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company elected to bring the market interest rate to current rates and increased it to 19.17%. Following management discussions the revenue generation ability from the manufacturing equipment bought under the funding obligation was reduced, resulting in a longer repayment period. The combination of these two changes prompted the Company to recognize a gain of $471,004 for the year ended December 31, 2021 in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

27. Leases

The Company entered into the following leases during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 respectively outlined below:

Nova Scotia, Canada

On January 1, 2013, MMI signed an initial lease with a lessor in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, commencing in 2013. The most recent amendment was signed on July 1, 2020 for a month to month lease for an 8,792 square foot facility, which currently hosts the Company’s holography and lithography R&D labs and manufacturing operations.

77


On August 31, 2020, MMI signed a ten-year lease with a lessor in Nova Scotia, Canada, commencing January 1, 2021, for an approximately 53,000 square foot facility, which will host the Company’s holography and lithography R&D labs and manufacturing operations. Commencing in September 2021, the Company was to pay monthly basic rent of CA$28,708 and additional rent for its proportionate share of operating costs and property taxes of CA$24,910 per month, subject to periodic adjustments. In conjunction with signing the lease, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the lessor in the amount of CA$500,000 to fund leasehold improvements.

The Company has accounted for the lease as an operating lease and recorded a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset in the amount of $1,021,499. The ROU asset is being amortized over the remaining lease term in an amount equal to the difference between the calculated straight-line expense of the total lease payments less the monthly interest calculated on the remaining lease liability.

On June 9, 2021, MMI signed a lease amendment with the landlord to expand the leased space of the facility by approximately 15,000 square feet, reduce the annual rent for the 10-year term of the lease and obtain from the landlord CA$500,000 in cash to fund ongoing tenant improvements. In exchange, the landlord received 993,490 MMI common shares valued at CA$3.40 per share.

The lease amendment was accounted for as a lease modification. As such, the operating lease liability was remeasured, and the difference was recorded in ROU assets.

California, United States

On June 3, 2021, MMI signed a lease amendment with its lessor in Pleasanton, California to expand the leased space of the facility in the United States to include additional office space of 5,475 square feet, commencing from June 2021. Alongside this lease amendment, the durations of all of the leased spaces were also extended until August 31, 2024. The lease amendment was accounted for as a lease modification. As such, the operating lease liability was remeasured, and the difference was recorded in ROU assets. These amendments required the Company to derecognize the existing right-of-use asset and operating lease liability and recognize a new right-of-use asset and an operating lease liability commencing June 2021.

On September 16, 2021, the Company signed an agreement to extend the lease term of its existing leased premises at Pleasanton, California, from September 1, 2024 to September 30, 2026. In addition, the Company also signed an agreement to lease an additional 8,904 square feet at the same property to have a total leased area at Pleasanton of 19,506 square feet. The new lease commenced on October 1, 2021 and has the same expiry date as above. The lease amendment was accounted for as a lease modification. As such, the operating lease liability was remeasured, and the difference was recorded in ROU assets as of December 31, 2021.

Massachusetts, United States

On September 17, 2021, the Company entered into an lease agreement with Boxer Property Management Corp. to lease a space of 4,414 square feet at 85 Swanson Road, Boxborough, MA with a term of two years commencing October 1, 2021. The Company recognized a ROU asset and an operating lease liability of $132,780 for this lease.

Athens, Greece

On November 1, 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement with Special Purpose AP10 S.A. Real Estate Company, to lease a space of 1,436 square meters (15,457 square feet) in Athens, Greece, with a term of 10 years commencing oNovember 1, 2021. The Company recognized a ROU asset and an operating lease liability of $1,019,795 (EUR 898,419) as of November 1, 2021. The Company

78


secured a rent-free period of 9 months commencing the date of lease commencement, and also prepaid two months amounting to $35,188 (EURO 31,000).

British Columbia, Canada

As part of the Nanotech acquisition (note 3) the Company acquired Nanotech's lease obligations, including a space of 7,860 square feet in British Columbia, Canada with a remaining lease term of 3 years and 7 months, ending on April 30, 2025. The Company recognized a ROU asset and an operating lease liability of $607,354 for this lease.

London, United Kingdom

In October 2020, the Company renewed its lease agreement to lease a space of 742 square feet in London, United Kingdom with a term of two years commencing on October 20, 2020. The Company recognized a ROU asset and an operating lease liability of $62,543 (GBP 46,284) at initial recognition.

Steinhausen, Switzerland

The Company entered into a lease agreement with a lessor to lease a space of 1,335 square feet at Steinhausen, Switzerland with a term of one year and four months commencing on March 1, 2021. The Company recognized a ROU asset and an operating lease liability of $25,009 (CHF 22,815) as of March 1, 2021. The monthly rent was reduced from $1,756 (CHF 1,602) to $ 1,019 (CHF 930) in August 2021 as per the terms of the agreement.

Total operating lease expense included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss is as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2021

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Operating lease expense

 

$

546,197

 

 

$

224,210

 

 

$

201,242

 

Short term lease expense

 

 

229,475

 

 

 

104,470

 

 

 

126,421

 

Variable and other lease expense

 

 

92,862

 

 

 

40,006

 

 

 

31,408

 

 Total

 

 

868,534

 

 

 

368,686

 

 

 

359,071

 

The Company completed its evaluation of the provisions of ASC 842 "Leases" and elected the practical expedient to not capitalize any leases with initial terms of less than twelve months on its balance sheet and include them as short term lease expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating lease obligations were as follows as of December 31, 2021:

 2022

 

 

1,028,314

 

 2023

 

 

1,176,935

 

 2024

 

 

1,180,745

 

 2025

 

 

1,098,049

 

Thereafter

 

 

3,965,777

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

 

8,449,820

 

Less: interest

 

 

(4,079,185

)

Present value of net minimum lease payments

 

 

4,370,635

 

Less: current portion of lease liabilities

 

 

(663,861

)

Total long-term lease liabilities

 

$

3,706,774

 

Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases is as follows:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2021

 

2020

Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term

 

5 years

 

2 years

Weighted Average Discount Rate

 

17.85 %

 

15 %

79


28. Commitments and contingencies

Legal Matters

On January 31, 2020, Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Torchlight Energy, Inc. and Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC were served with a lawsuit brought by Goldstone Holding Company, LLC (Goldstone(Goldstone Holding Company, LLC v. Torchlight Energy, Inc., et al., in the 160th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas). On February 24, 2020, Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., Torchlight Energy, Inc., and Torchlight Energy Operating, LLC timely filed their answer, affirmative defenses, and requests for disclosure. The suit, which seekssought monetary relief over $1$1 million, makesmade unspecified allegations of misrepresentations involving a November 2015 participation agreement and a 2016 amendment to the participation agreement. Torchlight has denied the allegations and has asserted several affirmative defenses including but not limited to, that the suit is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, that the claims havehad been released, and that the claims arewere barred because of contractual disclaimers between sophisticated note parties. Torchlight has also asserted counterclaims for attorney fees. On January 14, 2021, Goldstone Holding Company, LLC dismissed its claims without prejudice, leaving Torchlight’s counterclaims for attorney fees as the only pending claim in the case. On February 26, 2021, Torchlight filed a non-suit without prejudice on its counterclaims for attorney fees, leaving no claims in the case. The court signed a final order disposing of the entire case on March 5, 2021. However, Goldstone Holding Company, LLC asked the court to re-instate its claims. That matter is set forclaims, and a hearing was held on March 25,April 13, 2021. IfOn June 16, 2021, the court doessigned an order denying the motion to reinstate Goldstone Holding Company’s, LLC’s claims, and the case Torchlight intends to re-assert its attorney fees claim and to contest Goldstone’s claims.is closed.

On April 30, 2020, ourThe Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Hudspeth Oil Corporation, filed suit against Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies. The suit seeks the recovery of approximately $1.4$1.4 million in costs incurred as a result of a tool failure during drilling activities on the University Founders A25 #2 well that is located in the Orogrande Field. Working interest owner Wolfbone Investments, LLC, a company owned by ourthe Company's former Chairman Gregory Mccabe,McCabe, is a co-plaintiff in that action. After the suit was filed, Cordax filed a mineral lien in the amount of $104,500.01$104,500 against the Orogrande Field and has sued the operator and counterclaimed against HudpspethHudspeth for breach of contract, seeking the same amount as the lien. We are contesting the lien in good faith. We haveThe Company has added the manufacturer of one of the tool components that we contendthe Company contends was a cause of the tool failure. It was later discovered that Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cote rdax Evaluation Technologies forfeited its charter to conduct business in the State of Texas by failing to timely pay its franchise taxes, and the Company added members of the board of directors to the case pursuant to the Texas Tax Code. It was recently disclosed that Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies is the subsidiary of a Canadian parent company, Cordax Evaluation Technologies, Inc., who has also been added to the case. The suit, Hudspeth Oil Corporation and Wolfbone Investments, LLC v. Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies,, was filed in the 189th189th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. The Company’s current Chairman of the Board filed a special appearance after being served with citation, alleging that he was a Canadian citizen with no meaningful ties to Texas. After discovery was conducted on this issue, the Company filed a nonsuit without prejudice for this Defendant, dismissing him from the case. The remaining parties are currently engaged in preliminary discovery and are scheduling mediation.

On March 18, 2021, Datalog LWT, Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies filed a lawsuit in Hudspeth County, Texas seeking to foreclose its mineral lien against the Orogrande Field in the amount of $104,500.01 and recover related attorney’s fees. The foreclosure action, Datalog LWT Inc. d/b/a Cordax Evaluation Technologies v. Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., was filed in the 205th Judicial District Court of Hudspeth County, Texas. The Company is contesting the lien in good faith and filed a Plea in Abatement on May 10, 2021, seeking a stay in the Hudspeth County lien foreclosure case pending final disposition of the related case currently pending in Harris County, Texas.

In September 2021, the Company received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Enforcement, in a matter captioned In the Matter of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. The subpoena requests that the Company produces certain documents and information related to, among other things, the merger involving Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Metamaterial Inc. The Company is cooperating and intends to continue to cooperate with the SEC’s investigation. The Company can offer no assurances as to the outcome of this investigation or its potential effect, if any, on the Company or its results of operation.

On January 3, 2022, a putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York captioned Maltagliati v. Meta Materials Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-07203, against the Company, its Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer, Torchlight’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Torchlight’s former Chief Executive Officer. The complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of all purchasers of the Company’s publicly traded securities from September 21, 2020 through and including December 14, 2021, asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) arising primarily from a short-seller report and statements related to the Company’s business combination with Torchlight. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages and reasonable costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees.

On January 26, 2022, a similar putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York captioned McMillan v. Meta Materials Inc., et al., No. 1:22-cv-00463. This complaint names the same defendants and asserts the

80


same claims on behalf of the same purported class as the Maltagliati action. The Company believes these actions (collectively, the “Securities Class Action”) have no merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against these allegations.

On January 14, 2022, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Easter District of New York captioned Hines v. Palikaras, et al., No. 1:22-cv-00248. The complaint names as defendants certain of the Company’s current officers and directors, certain former Torchlight officers and directors, and the Company (as nominal defendant). The complaint, purportedly brought on behalf of the Company, asserts claims under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, contribution claims under Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act, and various state law claims such as breach of fiduciary duties and unjust enrichment. The complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages in favor of the Company, certain corporate governance related actions, and an award of costs and expenses to the derivative plaintiff, including attorneys’ fees.

 

Environmental MattersContractual Commitments and Purchase Obligations

a)
As highlighted in note 20, on January 29, 2021, the Company arranged an irrevocable standby letter of credit with TD in favor of Covestro for EUR 600,000

The Company is subject to contingencies as a result of environmental laws and regulations. Present and future environmental laws and regulations applicablein relation to the Company’s operations could require substantial capital expenditures or could adversely affectCFA agreement. In the event the Company fails to meet the performance milestones under the CFA, Covestro shall draw from the letter of credit with TD. The letter of credit was secured by restricted cash of CA$1,000,000 under a cash use agreement which has been recorded as long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets. In July 2021, the Company settled the long term debt and used its operationsown funds as guarantee. Covestro has issued certificates of reduction of $462,563 (ER 300,000) to reduce the letter of credit after completion of certain performance milestones. This will take effect in other ways that cannot be predictedFiscal 2022. As at this time. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, no amounts had been recorded because no specific liability2021, the letter of credit has an outstanding amount of EUR 600,000.

b)
During 2018, the Company arranged a guarantee/standby letter of credit with RBC in favor of Satair A/S for $500,000 in relation to an advance payment received. In the event the Company fails to deliver the product as per the contract or refuse to accept the return of the product as per the buyback clause of the contract or fails to repay the advance payment in accordance with the conditions of the agreement signed with Satair on September 18, 2018, Satair shall draw from the letter of credit with RBC. Borrowings from the letter of credit with RBC are repayable on demand. The letter of credit from RBC is secured by a performance security guarantee cover issued by Export Development of Canada. Further, this guarantee/standby letter of credit expires on October 5, 2022. As at December 31, 2021, 0 amount has been identified that is reasonably probable of requiring the Company to fund any future material amounts.

7.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

On January 10, 2020, the Company sold 600,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.60 per share for total proceeds of $360,000 in a private placement.

On January 16, 2020, the Company announced the closing of its underwritten public offering of 3,285,715 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $0.70 per share, for total proceeds of $1,997,118 after deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses payable by the Company.

In May 2020, the Company issued 680,376 shares of common stock in satisfaction of the payment in kind valued at $314,107 due on April 10, 2020 under the terms of the promissory notes held by the Straz Foundation and the Straz Trust (see Note 9 below).

In May 2020, we issued 1,630,434 restricted shares of common stock to an investor for the purchase price of $750,000. The investor, Maverick Oil & Gas Corporation, is the operator for our Orogrande Project. Our subsidiary Hudspeth Oil Corporation owed the investor in excess of $750,000 on unpaid balances and cost overruns on work performed on the Orogrande Project, which amount was due and payable. The investor agreed to a future credit of $750,000 in the balance of accounts receivable owed to it by Hudspeth Oil as consideration for the purchase of the common stock. Under the terms of the sale, we provided registration rights to the investor.

On May 20, 2020, the Company announced the closing of its underwritten public offering of 3,450,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $0.34 per share, for total proceeds of $886,622 after deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses payable by the Company. In connection with the offering the Company issued 172,500 warrants valued at $36,225 using the Black Scholes method.

54

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - continued

On June 16, 2020, the Company announced the closing of its registered direct offering of 7,894,737 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $0.38 per share, for total proceeds of $2,783,691 after deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses payable by the Company. In connection with the offering the Company issued 3,157,895 warrants. The warrants were exercised on July 9, 2020 under the cashless provisions in the agreement resulting in the Company issuing 3,157,895 shares of common stock for which no cash was received. Of the total proceeds receiveddrawn from the offering, $854,887 was allocated to the warrants using the pro rata percentageletter of the number of warrants to the total shares ultimately issued under the offering terms.credit with RBC.

c)

During the year endedOn December 31, 2020, the Company issued 317,857 shares of common stock with a fair value of $161,750 as compensation for services.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock to a vendor with a fair value of $26,000 for delay in payment on outstanding account payable.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock to note holders as compensation for extension of the maturity date of the notes. The fair value of the shares was $16,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 257,143 shares of common stock to a vendor with a fair value of $90,000 in payment of an outstanding account payable.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to the former CEO of the Company with a fair value of $45,000 in payment of an accrued liability from prior years.

On July 20, 2020,8, 2016, the Company entered into a Sales Agreementcooperation agreement with a large aircraft manufacturer to conduct an “at-the-market” equity offering program pursuantco-develop laser protection filters for space and aeronautical civil and military applications, metaAIR, and support the setup of manufacturing facilities for product certification and development. The cooperation agreement includes financial support provided to which the Company may issue and sell, from time to time at its sole discretion, sharesin the form of its common stock having an aggregate offering pricenon-recurring engineering costs of up to $7,000,000.$4,000,000 to be released upon agreement of technical milestones in exchange for a royalty fee due by the Company on gross profit after sales and distribution costs. The Sales Agent is entitledtotal royalty fee to an aggregate fixed commission of 3.0%be paid may be adjusted based on the timing of the gross proceeds from shares sold. Gross proceeds fromCompany’s sales and the amount ultimately paid to the Company by large aircraft manufacturer to support the development.

d)
Certain nano-optic products are subject to a 3% sales royalty in favor of 1,557,173 shares underSimon Fraser University (“SFU”) where certain elements of the Sales Agreement throughnano-optic technology originated. Royalties were $NaN during the period since acquisition date until December 31, 2020 totaled $511,966. Commissions and offering expenses on2021. In 2014, the sales totaled $125,981, resulting in net proceeds of $385,985 during the period.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 3,726,412 shares of common stock in conversion of principal and interest on notes payable with a fair value of $1,666,596.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 313,480 shares of common stock to its Chairman, Gregory McCabe in connection with the saleCompany's wholly owned subsidiary, Nanotech, prepaid royalties that would offset against future royalties owed as part of the Warwink property.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 4,696,100 shares of common stock for cash of $3,446,880.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued 416,667 shares of common stock for a subscription of $183,963.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued 312,593 shares of common stock with total fair value of $365,400 as compensation for services.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued 167,845 shares of common stock for lease interests with total fair value of $250,000.

55

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY- continued

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for lease extensions with total fair values of $125,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued 45,455 shares of common stock in conversions of notes payable valued at $50,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued 202,316 shares of common stock in payment in kind on notes payable valued at $314,108.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued 168,690 shares of common stock resulting from warrant and option exercises for consideration totaling $184,843.

Warrants and Options

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 715,000 warrants with total fair value of $148,900 as compensation for services and recorded expense of $68,250 related to options issued in prior periods.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 750,000 warrants valued at $382,500 in connection with the conversion of convertible notes payable into working interest in the Company’s Orogrande Project.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 600,000 warrants valued at $366,000 in connection with the sale of 600,000 shares of common stock valued at $360,000 in a private placement. Of the total proceeds received from the offering $181,488 was allocated to the warrants using the pro rata percentagetransfer of the fair market valueintellectual property from SFU, of the warrants.which $

197,016

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 172,500 warrants valued at $36,225 in connection with the offering of common stock on May 20, 2020remains prepaid as referred to above.

In connection with the registered direct offering closed June 16, 2020, as referenced above, the Company issued 3,157,895 warrants. The warrants were exercised on July 9, 2020 under the cashless provisions in the agreement resulting in the Company issuing 3,157,895 shares of common stock for which no cash was received. Of the total proceeds received from the offering $854,887 was allocated to the warrants using the pro rata percentage of the number of warrants to the total shares ultimately issued under the offering terms.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued and vested 100,000 warrants with total fair values of $99,000 as compensation for services and 2,032,122 warrants in connection with financings in 2019 and recorded expense of $241,570 related to warrants issued in prior periods.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company issued 700,000 stock options. The Company vested 700,000 stock options with total fair value of $236,500 as compensation for services.

56

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - continued

A summary of warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 by exercise price and year of expiration is presented below:

Exercise  Expiration Date in    
Price  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  Total 
$0.425   -   -   -   -   172,500   172,500 
$0.500   -   -   500,000   -   -   500,000 
$0.70   -   -   -   -   965,000   965,000 
$0.80   -   -   -   -   2,266,667   2,266,667 
$1.03   120,000   -   -   -   -   120,000 
$1.14   -   -   600,000   -   -   600,000 
$1.21   -   -   120,000   -   -   120,000 
$1.35   -   365,455   -   -   -   365,455 
$1.63   -   -   -   100,000   -   100,000 
$1.64   200,000   -   -   -   -   200,000 
$2.00   200,000   -   -   -   -   200,000 
     520,000   365,455   1,220,000   100,000   3,404,167   5,609,622 

Exercise  Expiration Date in    
Price  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  Total 
$0.70   420,000   -   -   -   -   -   420,000 
$0.80   -   -   -   -   -   1,666,667   1,666,667 
$1.03   -   120,000   -   -   -   -   120,000 
$1.14   -   -   -   600,000   -   -   600,000 
$1.21   -   -   -   120,000   -   -   120,000 
$1.35   -   -   365,455   -   -   -   365,455 
$1.40   321,737   -   -   -   -   -   321,737 
$1.63   -   -   -   -   100,000   -   100,000 
$1.64   -   200,000   -   -   -   -   200,000 
$1.80   1,250,000   -   -   -   -   -   1,250,000 
$2.00   -   200,000   -   -   -   -   200,000 
$2.23   339,901   -   -   -   -   -   339,901 
     2,331,638   520,000   365,455   720,000   100,000   1,666,667   5,703,760 

On June 11, 2020, 4,500,000 stock options previously granted to officers of the Company in 2015 expired.

On July 15, 2020, we entered into new one-year employment agreements with John Brda, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Roger Wurtele, our Chief Financial Officer. As part of their employment compensation, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Brda an option to purchase a total of up to 2,250,000 shares of common stock, including up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and up to 1,875,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, and granted Mr. Wurtele an option to purchase a total of up to 750,000 shares of common stock, including up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options were granted under our Amended and Restated 2015 Stock Option Plan. The options of both executives will vest upon either (a) the approval by shareholders of a change of control occurring prior to July 15, 2021, or (b) the Company entering into a letter of intent with a third party prior to July 15, 2021 that contemplates a change of control, and the change of control transaction closes with that third party (or an affiliate(s) of that third party) at a date not later than July 15, 2022; subject, however, to acceleration and earlier vesting of all of the options in the event of (i) the termination of employment by the employee for “good reason” under his employment agreement or (ii) a determination of the Compensation Committee, at its discretion. In the event of the death or disability of the employee prior to vesting or if the Company terminates the employee’s employment for reasons other than for “cause” under the employment agreement prior to vesting, the option will still vest upon the occurrence of the events described under clauses (a) or (b) above. The options, to the extent such options have not been exercised, will terminate and become null and void on July 15, 2025, if and only if the options vest as described above, or on July 15, 2021, if the options do not vest as described above, subject to the occurrence of the events contemplated under clause (b) above whereby the options would not terminate until July 15, 2022. At such time that the options vest, the Black Scholes valuation of the options will be recorded as an expense.

57

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY- continued

A summary of stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 by exercise price and year of expiration is presented below:

Exercise  Expiration Date in    
Price  2021  2022  2023  2024  2025  Total 
$0.50   -   -   -   -   750,000   750,000 
$1.00   -   -   -   -   2,250,000   2,250,000 
$0.85   -   -   -   600,000   -   600,000 
$0.97   259,742   -   -   -   -   259,742 
$1.10   -   800,000   -   -   -   800,000 
$1.19   -   -   700,000   -   -   700,000 
$1.63   -   58,026   -   -   -   58,026 
     259,742   858,026   700,000   600,000   3,000,000   5,417,768 

Exercise  Expiration Date in    
Price  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Total 
$0.85   -   -   -   -   600,000   600,000 
$0.97   -   259,742   -   -   -   259,742 
$1.10   -   -   800,000   -   -   800,000 
$1.19   -   -   -   700,000   -   700,000 
$1.57   4,500,000   -   -   -   -   4,500,000 
$1.63   -   -   58,026   -   -   58,026 
     4,500,000   259,742   858,026   700,000   600,000   6,917,768 

At December 31, 2020, the Company had reserved 11,027,390 common shares for future exercise of warrants and options.

58

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY - continued

Warrants and options granted were valued using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the warrants and options issued were as follows:

Risk-free interest rate.13% - 1.61%
Expected volatility of common stock90% - 205%
Dividend yield0.00%
Discount due to lack of marketability20%
Expected life of option/warrantThree Years to Five Years
2019
Risk-free interest rate1.65% - 2.46%
Expected volatility of common stock77% - 107%
Dividend yield0.00%
Discount due to lack of marketability20%
Expected life of option/warrantThree Years to Five Years

8.INCOME TAXES

The Company recorded no income tax provision for 2020 and 2019 because of losses incurred.

There are no uncertain tax positions accounted for in this tax provision.

The following is a reconciliation between the federal income tax benefit computed at statutory federal income tax rates and actual income tax provision for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

  Year ended  Year ended 
  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2019 
Federal income tax benefit at statutory rate $(2,684,199)   $(2,066,273)
Permanent Differences  308   1,336 
Annual reconciling adjustment  (45,514)  10,949 
Change in valuation allowance  2,729,405   2,053,988 
Provision for income taxes $-  $- 

The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:2021.

e)
Product revenue associated with 6

  December 31, 2020    December 31, 2019 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforward $16,245,560  $14,066,645 
Stock based compensation  4,773,723   4,688,694 
Disallowed interest expense  424,040   285,205 
Other  302,332   288,030 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Investment in oil and gas properties  (3,010,436)  (3,322,760)
Net deferred tax assets and liabilities  18,735,219   16,005,814 
Less valuation allowance  (18,735,219)  (16,005,814)
Total deferred tax assets and liabilities $-  $- 

patents acquired by Nanotech is subject to royalties. The Company had a net deferred tax assetagreed to share 10% of any revenues related to federal net operating loss carryforwardsthe patents received from a specific customer for a period of $77,359,811two years and $ongoing royalties of 66,984,0253 at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The federal net operating loss carryforward will begin% to expire in 2033. Realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent, in part,6% on generating sufficient taxable income prior to expiration of the loss carryforwards. The Company has placed a 100% valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset because future realization of these assets is not assured.

59

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.PROMISSORY NOTES

Promissory Notes Issued in 2017

On April 10, 2017, we sold two 12% unsecured promissory notes with a total of $8,000,000 in principal amount to David A. Straz, Jr. Foundation (the “Straz Foundation”) and the David A. Straz, Jr. Irrevocable Trust DTD 11/11/1986 (the “Straz Trust”) in a private transaction. Interest only was due and payable on the notes each month at the rate of 12% per annum, with a balloon payment of the outstanding principal due and payable at maturity on April 10, 2020. The holders of the notes also received annual payments of common stock at the rate of 2.5% of principal amount outstanding, based on a volume-weighted average price. Both notes were sold at an original issue discount of 94.25% and accordingly, we received total proceeds of $7,540,000other revenues derived from the investors. We used the proceedspatents for working capital and general corporate purposes, which includes, without limitation, drilling capital, lease acquisition capital and repaymenta period of prior debt.

The effective interest rate was 16.15%.

On February 20, 2020, the Company extended the maturity on $4 million of the 12% unsecured promissory notes previously due in April 2020. The maturity date of the subject promissory note had been extended for one year, from April 10, 2020 to April 10, 2021.

As part of the terms of this extension agreement, the Company paid the noteholder a fee of $80,000 on February 20, 2020.

Promissory Notes Issued in 2018

On February 6, 2018, we sold to the Straz Trust in a private transaction a 12% unsecured promissory note with a principal amount of $4,500,000. Interest only was due and payable on the note each month at the rate of 12% per annum, with a balloon payment of the outstanding principal due and payable at maturity on April 10, 2020. The holder of the note also received annual payments of common stock at the rate of 2.5% of principal amount outstanding, based on a volume-weighted average price. We sold the note at an original issue discount of 96.27% and accordingly, we received total proceeds of $4,332,150 from the investor. We used the proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes, which includes, without limitation, drilling capital, lease acquisition capital and repayment of prior debt.

The effective interest rate was 15.88%.

Extension of Promissory Notes

On April 24, 2020, the Company entered into a Note Amendment Agreement with each of the Straz Foundation, as a lender, the Straz Trust, as a lender and collateral agent, and The Northern Trust Company and Christopher M. Straz, as co-trustees of the Straz Trust. Under the Note Amendment Agreement, the parties agreed to amend and restate the two promissory notes issued to the Straz Trust on April 10, 2017 and February 6, 2018 that have total principal outstanding of $8,500,000, along with the promissory note issued to the Straz Foundation on April 10, 2017 which had an outstanding principal amount of $4,000,000. Under the Note Amendment Agreement, the maturity dates of the two promissory notes held by the Straz Trust and the Note held by the Foundation were extended to April 10, 2021. We had previously extended the maturity date of the promissory note held by the Straz Foundation to April 10, 2021.

Under the Note Amendment Agreements, we and our subsidiaries provided a first priority lien on certain collateral in favor of the collateral agent for the benefit of the lenders. The collateral includes all assets and property held by Hudspeth Oil Corporation and Torchlight Hazel, LLC, which includes without limitation our working interest in certain oil and gas leases in Hudspeth County, Texas, known as the “Orogrande Project” and our working interest in certain oil and gas leases in the Midland Basin in West Texas, known as the “Hazel Project.” Further, these subsidiaries, along with Torchlight Energy, Inc., provided guaranty with respect to payment of the three promissory notes. The Note Amendment Agreements also provided restrictions on the use of proceeds if the Orogrande Project or the Hazel Project were sold.

Additionally, the promissory notes, as amended, provided conversion rights whereby the lenders have the right, at each such lender’s option, to convert any portion of principal and interest into shares of common stock of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. at a conversion price of $1.50 per share.

60

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.PROMISSORY NOTES - continued

The Note Amendment Agreements (as further amended) provided that no later than May 25, 2020, we were obligated to pay: (a) to the lenders all past due interest that has accrued on the existing promissory notes, and (b) to the Straz Trust a fee of $170,000, which payments were made. Further, the agreements had certain negative covenants regarding related party transactions, dividends, stock repurchases, grants of liens on other assets, and payment of accrued executive compensation. There are also typical affirmative covenants regarding legal compliance and payment of taxes. The $170,000 extension fee was paid on May 22 and the interest payments were made on June 17, 2020 within the terms of a forbearance agreement which provided an extension of the due date of the interest payments.

All other terms and conditions of the three original promissory notes remained substantially unchanged, including without limitation, monthly payments of interest only at the rate of 12% per annum, with a balloon payment of the outstanding principal due and payable at maturity, and annual payments of common stock at the rate of 2.5% of the principal amount outstanding, based on a volume-weighted average price.

In May 2020 and April 2019, respectively, the holders of the notes described above received 680,376 and 202,316 shares of common stock as a payment in kind representing the annual payments of common stock due at the rate of 2.5% of principal amount outstanding as of April 10 based on a volume-weighted average price calculation.

The 12% promissory note transactions through December 31, 2020 are summarized as follows:

12% 2020 Unsecured promissory note balance - December 31, 2019 $12,377,830 
     
Note principal converted to common stock on July 14, 2020  (64,297)
Accretion of discount and amortization of debt issuance costs  367,288 
Debt extension fee paid  (250,000)
     
12% 2021 Secured promissory note balance - December 31, 2020 $12,430,821 

These notes payable issued in 2017 and 2018 totaling $12,500,000 were retired by conversion into common stock in 2021 and are classified as a long-term liability in our consolidated balance sheet. Reference Subsequent Events in Note 11.

Convertible Notes Issued in October 2018

On October 17, 2018, we sold to certain investors in a private transaction 16% Series C Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes with a total principal amount of $6,000,000. Interest and principal were due and payable on the notes in one balloon payment at maturity on April 17, 2020. The notes were convertible, at the election of the holders, into an aggregate 6% working interest in certain oil and gas leases in Hudspeth County, Texas, known as our “Orogrande Project.” After an analysis of the transaction and a review of applicable accounting pronouncements, management concluded that the notes issued on October 17, 2018 which contained a conversion right for holders to convert into a working interest in the Orogrande Project of the Company, meet a specific scope exception to the provisions requiring derivative accounting.

On March 9, 2020, each of the noteholders entered into a Conversion Agreement with us and our subsidiary Hudspeth Oil Corporation (“Hudspeth”), under which the noteholders elected to convert the notes, in accordance with their terms, into an aggregate 6% working interest (of all such holders) in the “Orogrande Project.” Principal of $6,000,000 and approximately $1,331,000 of accrued interest were converted at March 9, 2020.

61

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.PROMISSORY NOTES - continued

The Conversion Agreements also provided additional consideration to the noteholders including a limited carry, a top-off obligation of us and Hudspeth, and warrants to purchase a total of 750,000 restricted shares of our common stock, which warrants will have a term of five years and an exercise price of $0.70 per share. The limited carry provides that for the remainder of the 2020 calendar year, Hudspeth will pay all costs and expenses attributable to the assigned working interests, except where prohibited by law or regulation. The top-off obligation provides that, subject to the terms and conditions of the Conversion Agreements, if (a) we sell our entire working interest in the Orogrande Project, (b) as part of such sale, the holder’s entire working interests are sold, and (c) the gross proceeds received by all the holders in such transaction are equal to less than $9,000,000; then we must pay the holders an amount equal to $9,000,000, (i) less gross proceeds the holders received in the transaction, (ii) less the amount of the carry the holders received under the Conversion Agreements, and (iii) less any gross proceeds the holders received in any farmouts occurring prior to the transaction.

. There were 0

The transaction was treated as an extinguishment of debt. The fair value of the working interest transferred in the conversion of the debt was $8,778,000 and the value of warrants issued to the holders was $382,500. The Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt in the amount of $1,829,651royalties during the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company recorded $170,215 as additional Loss on Extinguishment of Debt to account for the cost of the carry through2021.

f)
As at December 31, 20202021, the Company had on-going commitments for maintenance contracts as follow:

 2022

 

$

292,125

 

 2023

 

 

43,730

 

 2024

 

 

3,105

 

 

 

$

338,960

 

 

Convertible Notes Issued in First Quarter 201981


On February 11, 2019 the Company raised a total of $2,000,000 from investors through the sale of two 14% Series D Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes. Principal was payable in a lump sum at maturity on May 11, 2020 with payments of interest payable monthly at the rate of 14% per annum. Holders of the notes had the right to convert principal and interest at any time into common stock at a conversion price of $1.08 per share. The Company had the right to redeem the notes at any time, provided that the redemption amount must include all interest that would have been earned through maturity. The Company evaluated the notes for beneficial conversion features and derivative accounting criteria and concluded that derivative accounting treatment was not applicable.

On April 21, 2020, Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. entered into agreements to amend the two 14% Series D Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes that were originally issued on February 11, 2019. Under the amendment agreements, (a) the maturity dates were extended from May 11, 2020 to November 11, 2021, (b) the conversion price under which the noteholders may convert into our common stock was changed from $1.08 to $0.43, and (c) the noteholders were provided the right, at each noteholder’s election, to convert their notes into either (i) a working interest in the Orogrande Project at the rate of one acre per $1,100 of principal and unpaid interest converted, or (ii) a working interest in the Hazel Project at the rate of one acre per $1,300 of principal and unpaid interest converted; provided, that the noteholders’ right to convert into either such working interest is subject to approval of the collateral agent of the Note Amendment Agreement with the Straz parties.

Under the note amendments, the noteholders agreed to forebear demand or collection on all interest payments due and payable under the Note, including any past due interest payments, for 20 days after the execution of the Note Amendment Agreement. Further, we agreed to (a) issue each holder 20,000 restricted shares of common stock immediately and (b) pay each holder a fee of $10,000, at the same time as the payment of past due interest is paid. The past due interest and fee was paid.

These two promissory notes will continue to provide for monthly payments of interest only at the rate of 14% per annum, with a balloon payment of the outstanding principal due and payable at maturity.

These notes payable have been converted into common stock. $1,000,000 was converted in December 2020 and the remaining $1,000,000 was converted in 2021 and is classified as a long-term liability in our consolidated balance sheet. Reference Subsequent Events in Note 11.

Convertible Notes Issued in Third Quarter 2019

In July 2019, the Company issued 8% Unsecured Convertible Promissory notes in the amount of $2,010,000 together with warrants to purchase our common stock. Principal and 8% interest were due at maturity on May 21, 2021. The principal and accrued interest on the notes were convertible into shares of common stock at $1.10 per common share at any time after the original issue date. Along with the notes, the three year warrants equal to 20% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the notes were issued to note holders. The warrants are exercisable at $1.35 per share.

Warrants issued along with the notes meet the requirements of the scope exemptions in ASC 815-10-15-74 and are thus classified as equity upon issuance. The Company determined the fair value of the warrants using the Black Scholes pricing formula and is recognized as a discount on the carrying amount of the notes and is credited to additional paid in capital. The fair value of the warrants at the issuance date was determined to be $240,455.

62

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.PROMISSORY NOTES - continued

A beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) of a convertible note is normally characterized as the convertible portion feature that provides a rate of conversion that is below market value or “in the money” when issued. The BCF related to the issuance of the notes was recorded at the issuance date. The BCF was measured using the intrinsic value method and is shown as a discount to the carrying amount of the convertible note and is credited to additional paid in capital. The intrinsic value of the BCF at the issuance date of the notes was determined to be $1,145,546.

The allocated fair values of the BCF and the warrants was recorded as a debt discount from the face amount of the notes and such discount is being accreted over the expected term of the notes and is charged to interest expense. The Company recognized interest expense of $680,072 and $199,972 from the amortization of debt discount from notes for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

These notes payable were retired by conversion into common stock in 2021 and are classified as a long-term liability in our consolidated balance sheet. Reference29. Subsequent Events in Note 11.events

Convertible Notes Issued in Fourth Quarter 2019

Effective October 31, 2019, the Company issued 10% unsecured convertible promissory notes in the amount of $540,000. Principal and interest were due at maturity on December 3, 2020. The principal and accrued interest on the notes were convertible into shares of common stock at $0.75 per common share at any time after the original issue date. The notes were alternatively convertible, at the election of the holders, into an aggregate 0.367% working interest in our Orogrande Project.

These notes payable were retired by conversion into common stock in December 2020. As an inducement to convert the Company adjusted the conversion price from $0.75 per share to $0.50 per share. Debt conversion expense of $176,400 related to the inducement was recorded.

Paycheck Protection Program Loan

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) made available low-interest rate loans to qualified small businesses, including under its Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”). On April 10, 2020, in order to supplement its cash balance, the Company submitted an application for a loan (“SBA loan”) in the amount of $77,477. On May 1, 2020, Company’s SBA loan application was approved, and the Company received the loan proceeds. The SBA loan has an interest rate of 0.98% and matures in April 2022.

Section 1106 of the CARES Act provides for forgiveness of up to the full principal amount of qualifying loans guaranteed under the PPP. The PPP and loan forgiveness are intended to provide economic relief to small businesses, such as the Company, that are adversely impacted under the COVID-19 Emergency Declaration issued by President Trump on March 13, 2020. The Company has applied for loan forgiveness which is expected to be processed and approved by the lender in March 2021.

During fourth quarter 2020, the Company applied to Chase Bank for forgiveness of the amount due on the PPP Loan. The amount of forgiveness shall be calculated (and may be reduced) in accordance with the requirements of the Paycheck Protection Program, including the provisions of Section 1106 of the CARES Act. The forgiveness amount will be subject to the Small Business Administration’s review. Any outstanding principal amount under the PPP Loan that is not forgiven shall convert to an amortizing term loan.

Secured Convertible Promissory Notes Issued in Third and Fourth Quarter, 2020

On September 18, 2020, McCabe Petroleum Corporation, a company owned by our chairman Gregory McCabe (“MPC”), loaned us $1,500,000, evidenced by a 6% Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “MPC Note”). The note bore interest at the rate of 6% per annum and provided for payment of the principal amount along with all accrued and unpaid interest in one lump sum payment on its maturity date of May 10, 2021. In connection with the proposed business combination transaction with Metamaterial Inc. (“Metamaterial”), the note provided the following requirements on the use of proceeds of the loan as follows: (i) we will lend $500,000 to Metamaterial pursuant to an 8% Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Metamaterial Note”); (ii) we will retain and use $500,000 for general corporate purposes, including without limitation, expenses incurred by us in connection with the proposed business combination transaction; and (iii) we will deposit $500,000 into an escrow account, to be held in escrow. If we and Metamaterial enter into a definitive agreement by the later of November 30, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to by us and Metamaterial in writing, the $500,000 from this escrow account will be released to us, and we will lend this amount to Metamaterial pursuant to another convertible promissory note (the “Second Metamaterial Note”). If we do not enter into a definitive agreement by the later of November 30, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to in writing, the $500,000 from this escrow account will be released back to MPC and deducted from the principal amount outstanding under the MPC Note.

63

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9.PROMISSORY NOTES - continued

The MPC Note was secured by our pledge of the Metamaterial Note and the Second Metamaterial Note (if issued). If we and Metamaterial do not enter into a definitive agreement by the later of November 30, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to in writing, then promptly after that date, we will assign to MPC the Metamaterial Note in full repayment and discharge of $500,000 (plus accrued and unpaid interested on the Metamaterial Note) of the principal amount of the MPC Note, and the remaining $500,000 (less accrued and unpaid interested on the Metamaterial Note) of the principal amount, plus all unpaid interest accrued under the MPC Note, will remain subject to the MPC Note. If a definitive agreement is entered into by the later of November 30, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to in writing, but the proposed business combination transaction is terminated prior to closing or otherwise does not close by the maturity date of the MPC Note, then we will assign to MPC both the Metamaterial Note and Second Metamaterial Note in full repayment and discharge of $1,000,000 (plus accrued and unpaid interested on the Metamaterial Note and Second Metamaterial Note) of the principal amount of the MPC Note, and the remaining $500,000 (less accrued and unpaid interested on the Metamaterial Note and Second Metamaterial Note) of the principal amount, plus all unpaid interest accrued under the MPC Note, will remain subject to the MPC Note.

The MPC Note also provided that if (i) we and Metamaterial do not enter into a definitive agreement by the later of November 30, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to in writing, or (ii) we and Metamaterial enter into a definitive agreement but the proposed transaction is terminated prior to closing or otherwise does not close by the maturity date of the MPC Note, then at such time and until the maturity date, MPC will have the right, at its option, to convert up to $500,000 of the remaining principal amount of the MPC Note, plus all unpaid interest accrued under the MPC Note, into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.375 per share. Additionally, if the proposed transaction with Metamaterial closes, all principal and interest under the MPC Note will automatically convert into shares of our common stock at $0.375 per share. On January 29, 2021, we and MPC agreed to amend the MPC note to allow MPC to convert at any time, including prior to closing of the Metamaterial transaction.

In addition, Greg McCabe loaned the Company $100,000 on December 30, 2020. The Company evaluated the notes for a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) and derivative accounting criteria and concluded that there was no BCF or derivative accounting treatment applicable.

Both of these notes have been paid by conversion into common stock in 2021. Reference Subsequent Events in Note 11.

Loan to Metamaterial Inc.

On September 20, 2020, we loaned Metamaterial $500,000, evidenced by an 8% Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Metamaterial Note”). An additional $500,000 was loaned on December 16, 2020. The notes bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum and provides for payment of the principal amount along with all accrued and unpaid interest lump sum payments on its maturity date of September 20, 2022 and December 16, 2022 respectively. Metamaterial has the right to redeem after 120 days. The note is convertible at the price of $0.35 (CAD) per share at the option of the holder if the definitive agreement for the proposed transaction between us and Metamaterial is not entered into by November 2, 2020 (unless extended in writing by the parties) or the definitive agreement is entered but is terminated or expires without closing. The date was extended, and the Definitive Agreement was executed on December 4, 2020. The Company evaluated the notes for a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) and derivative accounting criteria and concluded that there was no BCF or derivative accounting treatment applicable. Accrued interest of $12,822 was recorded at December 31, 2020 on the two notes.

10.ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

The following is a reconciliation of the asset retirement obligations liability through December 31, 2020:

     
Asset retirement obligations – December 31, 2019 $23,319 
     
Accretion expense  520 
Estimated liabilities recorded  - 
Liability reduction at sale of property  (1,995)
     
Asset retirement obligations – December 31, 2020 $21,844 

64

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

11.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 3, 2021 and on March 11, 2021, we and our Ontario subsidiaries entered into an Amendment to the Arrangement Agreement with Meta to, among other things, update the Plan of Arrangement attached to the Arrangement Agreement.

In connection with the Option Agreement entered into for the Hazel Project with MHP, in January 2021, we were notified by MHP of its intention to exercise its option to perform operations sufficient to satisfy Torchlight’s continuous development obligation on the northern half of the Hazel prospect.

On February 10, 2021, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of 23,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.20 per share, which included the full exercise of the underwriter’s over-allotment option, for gross proceeds to Torchlight of $27.6 million before deducting the underwriting discount and offering expenses payable by Torchlight. In a separate transaction an investor acquired 300,000 shares of common stock for $240,000 in cash.

On February 18, 2021, Torchlight loaned to Meta $10,000,000, evidenced by an unsecured convertible promissory note issued by Meta (the “Promissory Note”),substantially in the same form as the previous bridge notes issued by Meta to us, to satisfy Torchlight’s requirement to provide additional bridge financing to Meta pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement. These bridge loans, including the aggregate principal and unpaid interest, will be included in, and credited against, the funds we are obligated to raise in the Pre-Closing Financing. Upon the closing of the Arrangement, all of the bridge notes will be deemed cancelled and paid in full.

Subsequent to December 31, 2020 the Company has issued 16,725,797 shares of common2021, 82,753 stock valued at $17,263,575options and 156,728 warrants were exercised.

Item 9. Changes in conversion of notes payable. In addition the Company issued 186,329 shares of common stock valued at $248,479 for Payment in Kind in connection with conversion of notes payable. As of the date of this annual report, all promissory note debt has been paid in full or converted to common stock.and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

1,295,326 shares of common stock were issued subsequent to December 31, 2020 in exercise of warrantsItem 9A. Controls and options for cash and 507,951 shares of common stock was issued in cashless exercise of warrants and options.Procedures.

25,000 shares of common stock were issued for services.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through March 18, 2021, the date when the financial statements were available to be issued and no additional events were noted that require adjustments or disclosure.

65

TORCHLIGHT ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION

AND PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES

(Unaudited)

The unaudited supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and production activities has been presented in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas and the SEC’s final rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting.

Investment in oil and gas properties during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 is detailed as follows:

  2020  2019 
Property acquisition costs $-  $- 
Development costs $3,472,281  $6,641,467 
Exploratory costs $-  $- 
         
Totals $3,472,281  $6,641,467 

Property acquisition costs presented above exclude interest capitalized into the full cost pool of $2,353,700 in 2020 and $2,858,753 in 2019.

Property acquisition cost relates to the Company’s development costs incurred in the Orogrande Project in west Texas. The development costs include work in the Orogrande and Hazel projects in west Texas. No development costs were incurred for Oklahoma properties in 2020.

Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

66

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had no proved reserves. At December 31, 2019 we had proved reserves related only to the Warwink project which was sold on November 11, 2020 (effective November 1, 2020). The Hazel and Orogrande Projects consist only of unevaluated properties in progress of development for future production. At December 31, 2020 there are no proved nonproducing reserves related to these properties. The Oklahoma properties are marginal producing wells which are not economic in the context of proved reserve value. The estimates of our 2019 proved reserves and the PV-10 set forth herein reflect estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development costs, using prices and costs under existing economic conditions. The amounts shown do not give effect to non-property related expenses, such as corporate general administrative expenses and debt service, future income taxes or to depreciation, depletion and amortization.

  December 31, 2020  December 31, 2020 
  Reserves  Future Net Revenue (M$) 
        Total     Present Value
Discounted
 
Category Oil (Bbls)  Gas (Mcf)  (BOE)  Total  at 10% 
                
Proved Producing  0   0   0  $-  $- 
Proved Undeveloped  0   0   0  $-  $- 
Total Proved  0   0   0  $-  $- 
                     
Standardized Measure of Future Net Cash Flows Related to Proved Oil and Gas Properties                 $- 
                     
Probable Undeveloped  0   0   0  $-  $- 
                     
  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2019 
  Reserves  Future Net Revenue (M$) 
        Total     Present Value
Discounted
 
Category Oil (Bbls)  Gas (Mcf)  (BOE)  Total  at 10% 
                
Proved Producing  14,700   21,100   18,217  $634  $514 
Proved Nonproducing  0   0   0  $-  $- 
Total Proved  14,700   21,100   18,217  $634  $514 
                     
Standardized Measure of Future Net Cash Flows Related to Proved Oil and Gas Properties                 $539 
                     
Probable Undeveloped  0   0   0  $-  $- 

The decrease in producing reserves from 2019 to 2020 from 18,217 to -0- BOE is related to the sale of the Winkler properties on November 11, 2020 (effective November 1, 2020) and the decline in production in the Oklahoma properties.

Reserve values as of December 31, 2019 are related to a single producing well in the Warwink Project.

BOE equivalents are determined by combining barrels of oil with MCF of gas divided by six.

67

Standardized Measure of Oil & Gas Quantities - Volume Rollforward
Year Ended December 31, 2020

The following table sets forth the Company’s net proved reserves, including the changes therein, and proved developed reserves:

  Crude Oil (Bbls)  Natural Gas (Mcf)  BOE 
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES:            
Beginning of period  14,710   21,130   18,232 
Revisions of previous estimates  -   -   - 
Extensions, discoveries and other additions  -   -   - 
Divestiture of Reserves  (9,265)  (16,132)  (11,954)
Acquisition of Reserves  -   -   - 
Production  (5,445)  (4,998)  (6,278)
End of period  -   -   - 

Standardized Measure of Oil & Gas Quantities - Volume Rollforward
Year Ended December 31, 2019

The following table sets forth the Company’s net proved reserves, including the changes therein, and proved developed reserves:

  Crude Oil (Bbls)  Natural Gas (Mcf)  BOE 
TOTAL PROVED RESERVES:            
Beginning of period  974,780   156,940   1,000,937 
Revisions of previous estimates  (944,985)  (121,400)  (965,218)
Extensions, discoveries and other additions  -   -   - 
Divestiture of Reserves  -   -   - 
Acquisition of Reserves  -   -   - 
Production  (15,085)  (14,410)  (17,487)
End of period  14,710   21,130   18,232 

68

Standardized Measure of Oil & Gas Quantities
Year Ended December 31, 2020 & 2019

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves is as follows:

  2020  2019 
       
Future cash inflows $-  $843,040 
Future production costs  -   (196,670)
Future development costs  -   - 
Future income tax expense  -   - 
Future net cash flows  -   646,370 
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows  -   (107,070)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to proved reserves $-  $539,300 

A summary of the changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows applicable to proved oil and natural gas reserves is as follows:

  2020  2019 
Balance, beginning of period $539,300  $5,341,330 
Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production (lifting) costs related to future production  (632,020)  1,176,090 
Changes in estimated future development costs  -   1,851,760 
Net change due to revisions in quantity estimates  -   (5,896,344)
Accretion of discount  107,070   (868,787)
Other  -   (1,763,161)
         
Net change due to extensions and discoveries  -   - 
Net change due to sales of minerals in place  (9,452)  - 
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced during the period  (4,898)  (294,912)
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the period  -   993,324 
Net change in income taxes  -   - 
Balance, end of period $-  $539,300 

Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited nature of reservoir data, both proved and probable reserves are subject to change as additional information becomes available. The estimates of reserves, future cash flows, and present value are based on various assumptions, including those prescribed by the SEC, and are inherently imprecise. Although we believe these estimates are reasonable, actual future production, cash flows, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, and quantities of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves may vary substantially from these estimates.

In estimating probable reserves, it should be noted that those reserve estimates inherently involve greater risk and uncertainty than estimates of proved reserves. While analysis of geoscience and engineering data provides reasonable certainty that proved reserves can be economically producible from known formations under existing conditions and within a reasonable time, probable reserves involve less certainty than reserves with a higher classification due to less data to support their ultimate recovery. Probable reserves have not been discounted for the additional risk associated with future recovery. Prospective investors should be aware that as the categories of reserves decrease with certainty, the risk of recovering reserves at the PV-10 calculation increases. The reserves and net present worth discounted at 10% relating to the different categories of proved and probable have not been adjusted for risk due to their uncertainty of recovery and thus are not comparable and should not be summed into total amounts.

69

Reserve Estimation Process, Controls and Technologies

The reserve estimates, including PV-10 estimates, for 2019 as set forth above were prepared by PeTech Enterprises, Inc. for the Company’s Properties in Oklahoma. These calculations were prepared using standard geological and engineering methods generally accepted by the petroleum industry and in accordance with SEC financial accounting and reporting standards.

Results of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities         
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 Total  Texas  Oklahoma 
          
Oil and Gas revenue $193,379  $186,473  $6,906 
             
Production costs $188,481  $176,114  $12,367 
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization $820,441  $746,601  $73,840 
Exploration expenses $-  $-  $- 
   1,008,922  $922,715  $86,207 
             
Income tax expense $-  $-  $- 
             
Results of Operations (excluding corporate overhead and interest costs) $(815,543) $(736,242) $(79,301)

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management,Management, with the participation of ourthe Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of ourthe Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2020. 2021.

Based on this evaluation, ourthe Company's management including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2020, ourdue to the material weaknesses in the Company's internal control over financial reporting described below, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective inas of December 31, 2021.

However, giving full consideration to the material weaknesses, the Company has concluded that they ensure that information required to be disclosed by usthe consolidated financial statements included in the reports that we file or submitAnnual Report on Form 10-K present fairly, in all material respects, the Company’s financial position, the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the periods presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a‑15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by and under the Exchange Actsupervision of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and effected by the Company’s management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, using the criteria set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2021, due to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness is (1) recorded, processed, summarizeda deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management has determined that it did not maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting due to the existence of the following identified material weaknesses:

An ineffective control environment resulting from a lack of the required number of trained financial reporting, accounting, information technology (IT) and reported withinoperational personnel with the time periods specifiedappropriate skills and knowledge and with assigned responsibility and accountability related to the design, implementation, and operation of internal control over financial reporting.
The insufficient number of personnel described above contributed to an ineffective risk assessment process necessary to identify all relevant risks of material misstatement and to evaluate the implications of relevant risks on its internal control over financial reporting.
An ineffective information and communication process resulting from: (i) insufficient communication of internal control information, including objectives and responsibilities, such as delegation of authority; and (ii) ineffective general IT controls and ineffective controls over information from a service organization, resulting in insufficient controls to ensure the SEC’s rulesrelevance, timeliness and forms,quality of information used in control activities.
As a consequence of the above, the Company had ineffective control activities related to the design, implementation and (2) accumulatedoperation of process level and communicatedfinancial statement close controls which had a pervasive impact on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

82


An ineffective monitoring process resulting from the evaluation and communication of internal control deficiencies, including monitoring corrective actions, not being performed in a timely manner.

These material weaknesses resulted in material misstatements, which were corrected prior to ourthe release of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021, and also in immaterial misstatements, some of which were corrected prior to the release of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021. These material weaknesses create a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In accordance with guidance issued by the SEC, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their final assessment of internal control over financial reporting for the first fiscal year in which the acquisition occurred. Our management, includingwith the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriatehas limited the evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.exclude controls, policies and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting of the recently acquired operations of Nanotech Security Corp. (acquired on October 5, 2021). The operations of Nanotech Security Corp. represent approximately 17% of our total assets and 45% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2021.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management acknowledges its responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Management has also evaluated the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles within the guidelines of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission framework (2013). Based on the results of this evaluation, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2020. TheKPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, of Briggs & Veselka Co, as auditors of the Company’s financial statements included in the Annual Report, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report from our registered public accounting firm regardingPlan for Remediation of Material Weaknesses

Management is continuing to evaluate and strengthen the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting was not subject to such attestation as weensure that management can routinely prepare our financial statements under GAAP, meet the requirements of the Company's independent auditors and remain in compliance with the SEC reporting requirements. These efforts are a non-accelerated filer.time consuming and require significant resource investment that the Company is committed to making.

The Company is still developing and documenting the full extent of the procedures to implement to remediate the material weaknesses described above, however the current remediation plan includes:

Training the newly hired ERP specialist and Supply Chain and Procurement Director.
Identifying and hiring additional key positions necessary to support the Company’s initiatives related to internal controls over financial reporting, including but not limited to Technical Accounting, Transactional Accounting, IT Management and Analysts.
Hiring consultants to assist with process improvements and control remediation efforts in targeted accounting, IT and operations processes.
Continuing on-going testing of policies and procedures implemented in late 2021 to assess their effectiveness.
Formalizing its entity-wide risk assessment process, and documenting internal ownership of risk monitoring and mitigation efforts, with improved risk monitoring activities and regular reporting to those charged with governance at an appropriate frequency.
Finalize a delegation of authority matrix to enforce desired limits of authority for key transactions, events, and commitments, and communicating these limits of authority to relevant personnel throughout the Company.

Changes in Internal ControlsControls.

There wereExcept for the material weaknesses described above, no changes in our Company’sthe Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(f) ofand 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)Act) occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2020,2021 that havehas materially affected, or areis reasonably likely to materially affect, ourthe Company's internal control over financial reporting.

70

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES- continued

Limitations on Effectiveness of Internal Controls and Procedures

Our management,Management, including ourthe Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that disclosure controls or internal controls, when effective, will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

83


Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management’s override of the control. The design of any systems of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Individual persons may perform multiple tasks which normally would be allocated to separate persons and therefore extra diligence must be exercised during the period these tasks are combined.

Item 9B. Other Information.

Effective as of February 28, 2022, the Board of Directors of the Company voted to promote Kenneth L. Rice to the position of Chief Operating Officer. In this new role Mr. Rice will retain his duties as Chief Financial Officer and will assume management responsibility for Business Development Operations, Manufacturing and Quality Control.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

Not applicable.

71

PART III

ITEMItem 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our executive officersDirectors, Executive Officers and directors are as follows:

NameAgePosition(s) and Office(s)
John A. Brda56Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Director
Roger N. Wurtele74Chief Financial Officer
Greg McCabe, Sr.60Director
Alexandre Zyngier51Director
Robert Lance Cook64Director
Michael Graves53Director

Below is certain biographical information of our executive officers and directors:

John A. Brda – Mr. Brda has been our Chief Executive Officer since December 2014 and our President, Secretary and a member of the Board of Director since January 2012. He has been the Managing Member of Brda & Company, LLC since 2002, which provided consulting services to public companies—with a focus in the oil and gas sector—on investor relations, equity and debt financings, strategic business development and securities regulation matters, prior to him becoming President of the company.

We believe Mr. Brda is an excellent fit to our Board of Directors and management team based on his extensive experience in transaction negotiation and business development, particularly in the oil and gas sector as well as other non-related industries. He has consulted with many public companies in the last ten years, and we believe that his extensive network of industry professionals and finance firms will contribute to our success.

Roger N. Wurtele – Mr. Wurtele has served as our Chief Financial Officer since September 2013. He is a versatile, experienced finance executive that has served as Chief Financial Officer for several public and private companies. He has a broad range of experience in public accounting, corporate finance and executive management. Mr. Wurtele previously served as CFO of Xtreme Oil& Gas, Inc. from February 2010 to September 2013. From May 2013 to September 2013 he worked as a financial consultant for us. From November 2007 to January 2010, Mr. Wurtele served as CFO of Lang and Company LLC, a developer of commercial real estate projects. He graduated from the University of Nebraska and has been a Certified Public Accountant for 40 years.

Gregory McCabe – Mr. McCabe has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2016 and was appointed Chairman of the Board in October 2016. He is an experienced geologist who brings over 36 years of oil and gas experience to our company. He is a principal of numerous oil and gas focused entities including McCabe Petroleum Corporation, Manix Royalty, Masterson Royalty Fund and GMc Exploration. He has been the President of McCabe Petroleum Corporation from 1986 to the present. Mr. McCabe has been involved in numerous oil and gas ventures throughout his career and has a vast experience in technical evaluation, operations and acquisitions and divestitures. Mr. McCabe is also our largest stockholder and provided entry for us into our two largest assets, the Hazel Project in the Midland Basin and the Orogrande Project in Hudspeth County, Texas.

We believe that Mr. McCabe’s background in geology and his many years in the oil and gas industry compliments the Board of Directors.

Robert Lance Cook – Mr. Cook has been a member of our Board of Directors since February 2019. Since August 2020, he has been the President of Sage Geosystems LLC, a company founded in Texas in 2020 which has developed a proprietary geothermal process which recently received funding for field trials. Previously, he was the Vice President of Production Operations of WellsX Corp. from July 2018 to August 2020. WellsX provides hydraulic fracturing and related oilfield services. Additionally, he has been the Managing Partner of Metis Energy LLC since January 2017, which owns and operates oil and gas wells in Texas as well as holds proprietary intellectual properties. Further, he is the President of Sage Geosystems LLC, a company founded in Texas in 2020 which has developed a proprietary geothermal process which is currently seeking funding for field trials. Prior to holding these positions, Mr. Cook worked for Shell Oil Company and its subsidiaries for over 36 years, retiring from the company in September 2016. He held numerous management and engineering positions for Shell, including most recently Chief Scientist for Wells and Production Technology and Chief Operations Officer for SWMS JV with Great Wall Drilling Company from January 2012 until his retirement. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Texas.

We believe Mr. Cook’s wide-ranging experience in operating exploration and production companies makes him an excellent fit to the Board of Directors.

Michael J. Graves – Mr. Graves has served on the Board of Directors since August 17, 2017. He is a Certified Public Accountant, and since 2005 he has been a managing shareholder of Fitch & Graves in Sioux City, Iowa, which provides accounting and tax, financial planning, consulting and investment services. Since 2008, he has also been a registered representative with Western Equity Group where he has worked in investment sales. He is also presently a shareholder in several businesses involved in residential construction and property rentals. Previously, he worked at Bill Markve & Associates, Gateway 2000 and Deloitte& Touche. He graduated Summa Cum Laude from the University of South Dakota with a B.S. in Accounting.

72

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE- continued

With Mr. Graves’ extensive background in accounting and investment businesses, we believe his understanding of financial statements, business valuations, and general business performance are a valuable asset to the Board.

Alexandre Zyngier – Mr. Zyngier has served on our Board of Directors since June 2016. He has been the Managing Director of Batuta Advisors since founding it in August 2013. The firm pursues high return investment and advisory opportunities in the distressed and turnaround sectors. Mr. Zyngier has over 20 years of investment, strategy, and operating experience. He is currently a director of Atari SA and of certain private entities. Before starting Batuta Advisors, Mr. Zyngier was a portfolio manager at Alden Global Capital from February 2009 until August 2013, investing in public and private opportunities. He has also worked as a portfolio manager at Goldman Sachs & Co. and Deutsche Bank Co. Additionally, he was a strategy consultant at McKinsey & Company and a technical brand manager at Procter & Gamble. Mr. Zyngier holds an MBA in Finance and Accounting from the University of Chicago and a BS in Chemical Engineering from UNICAMP in Brazil.

We believe that Mr. Zyngier’s investment experience and his experience in overseeing a broad range of companies will greatly benefit the Board of Directors.

On August 12, 2019, LootCrate Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in Delaware. Mr. Zyngier is an independent director of LootCrate, Inc. and oversaw the company’s filing.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own beneficially more than ten percent of our common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the SEC. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto filed electronically with the SEC during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, we believe that the directors, executive officers, and greater than ten percent beneficial owners have complied with all applicable filing requirements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, except for (i) one untimely Form 4 filed on August 17, 2020 by our Chief Executive Officer John Brda with respect to two transactions occurring on July 15, 2020, (ii) one untimely Form 4 filed on August 17, 2020 by our Chief Financial Officer Roger Wurtele with respect to two transactions occurring on July 15, 2020, and (iii) three untimely Form 4s filed on October 13 and December 22, 2020 and on January 12, 2021 by our Chairman Gregory McCabe with respect to three transactions occurring on September 18, November 11 and December 30, 2020.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics is available at our website at torchlightenergy.com. Further, we undertake to provide by mail to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of such code of ethics if we receive the request in writing by mail to: Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., 5700 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 3600, Plano, Texas 75093.

Procedures for Stockholders to Recommend Nominees to the Board

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors since we last provided disclosure regarding this process.

Audit Committee

We maintain a separately designated standing audit committee. The Audit Committee currently consists of our three independent directors, Alexandre Zyngier, Michael Graves, and Robert Lance Cook. Mr. Zyngier is the Chairman of the Audit Committee, and the Board of Directors has determined that he is an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 5(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial statements on behalf of the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee meets privately with our management and with our independent registered public accounting firm and evaluates the responses by our management both to the facts presented and to the judgments made by our outside independent registered public accounting firm.

73

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Corporate Governance.

The following table provides summary information for the years of 2020 and 2019 concerning cash and non-cash compensation paid or accruedrequired by this Item will be provided in an amendment to orthis Annual Report on behalf of certain executive officers.Form 10-K in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

SummaryItem 11. Executive Compensation Table

Name and
Principal
Position
 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
(A)
(1)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
John A. Brda  2020  $375,000   -   -  $-   -   -   -  $375,000 
CEO/Secretary/Director  2019  $375,000   -   -  $-   -   -   -  $375,000 
                                     
Roger Wurtele  2020  $225,000   -   -  $-   -   -   -  $225,000 
CFO  2019  $225,000   -   -  $-   -   -   -  $225,000 

(A)Stock/Option Value as applicable is determined using the Black Scholes Method.

Setting Executive Compensation

We fix executive base compensation at a level we believe enables us to hire and retain individuals in a competitive environment and to reward satisfactory individual performance and a satisfactory level of contribution to our overall business goals. We also take into account the compensation that is paid by companies that we believe to be our competitors and by other companies with which we believe we generally compete for executives.

In establishing compensation packages for executive officers, numerous factors are considered, including the particular executive’s experience, expertise, and performance, our company’s overall performance, and compensation packages available in the marketplace for similar positions. In arriving at amounts for each component of compensation, our Compensation Committee strives to strike an appropriate balance between base compensation and incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee also endeavors to properly allocate between cash and non-cash compensation (including without limitation stock and stock option awards) and between annual and long-term compensation.

Employment Agreements

On July 15, 2020, we entered into new one-year employment agreements with each of John Brda, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Roger Wurtele, our Chief Financial Officer. Their previous employment agreements expired in June 2020. Under the new agreements, Messrs. Brda and Wurtele will continue to receive their same annual salaries of $375,000 and $225,000, with 36% and 20% of the salaries, respectively, continuing to accrue unpaid until such time as the Board of Directors believes there is adequate cash for such payment, or as otherwise contemplated in the employment agreement. Each individual will be eligible for a bonus at the Compensation Committee’s discretion. Each agreement provides that if there is a “change of control” in the company (as defined in the agreement), the employee will be paid in one lump sum any amounts owed to the employee under the agreement that are accrued and unpaid plus his salary that would be earned through the end of the term of the agreement. Each employment agreement has a covenant not to compete and provides for expense reimbursement, four weeks of vacation and certain other benefits.

Additionally, as part of their employment compensation, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Brda an option to purchase a total of up to 2,250,000 shares of common stock, including up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and up to 1,875,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, and granted Mr. Wurtele an option to purchase a total of up to 750,000 shares of common stock, including up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options were granted under our Amended and Restated 2015 Stock Option Plan. The options of both executives will vest upon either (a) the approval by shareholders of a change of control occurring prior to July 15, 2021, or (b) the company entering into a letter of intent with a third party prior to July 15, 2021 that contemplates a change of control, and the change of control transaction closes with that third party (or an affiliate(s) of that third party) at a date not later than July 15, 2022; subject, however, to acceleration and earlier vesting of all of the options in the event of (i) the termination of employment by the employee for “good reason” under his employment agreement or (ii) a determination of the Compensation Committee, at its discretion. In the event of the death or disability of the employee prior to vesting or if the company terminates the employee’s employment for reasons other than for “cause” under the employment agreement prior to vesting, the option will still vest upon the occurrence of the events described under clauses (a) or (b) above. The options, to the extent such options have not been exercised, will terminate and become null and void on July 15, 2025, if and only if the options vest as described above, or on July 15, 2021, if the options do not vest as described above, subject to the occurrence of the events contemplated under clause (b) above whereby the options would not terminate until July 15, 2022.

74

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION- continued

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

Compensation.

The following table details all outstanding equity awards heldinformation required by our named executive officers at December 31, 2020:this Item will be provided in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

  Option Awards       Equity Incentive       
  Number of  Number of    Plan Awards:       
  Securities  Securities    Number of       
  Underlying  Underlying    Securities       
  Unexercised  Unexercised    Underlying  Option    
  Options  Options    Unexercised  Exercise  Option 
     (#)     (#)    Unearned Options  Price  Expiration 
Name Exercisable  Unexercisable    (#)  ($)  Date 
                  
John A. Brda  -   375,000 (1)  -  $0.50   7/15/2025 
   -   1,875,000 (1)  -  $1.00   7/15/2025 
                       
Roger Wurtele  -   375,000 (1)  -  $0.50   7/15/2025 
   -   375,000 (1)  -  $1.00   7/15/2025 

(1)The options were awarded on July 15, 2020. The Compensation Committee granted Mr. Brda an option to purchase a total of up to 2,250,000 shares of common stock, including up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and up to 1,875,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, and granted Mr. Wurtele an option to purchase a total of up to 750,000 shares of common stock, including up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and up to 375,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The options were granted under our 2015 Stock Option Plan which plan was approved by stockholders on October 26, 2020

CompensationItem 12. Security Ownership of Directors

We have no standard arrangement pursuant to which directors are compensated for any services they provide or for committee participation or special assignments. Historically, we have granted stock options to directors on a year-to-year basis. On October 26, 2020, however, we instead approved accruing cash payments to the board members, until such time as we have adequate cash on hand to pay any such accrued amounts to the board members. Since that date, each independent member of the board has received $100,000 per annum, payable $25,000 per quarter in advance to each such board member, with the fourth quarter of 2020 being pro-rated.

Summary Director Compensation Table

Compensation to directors during the year ended December 31, 2020 was as follows:

  Fees Earned             Nonqualified       
  And Accrued     Option Awards    Non-Equity  Deferred  All    
  in  Stock  Option    Incentive Plan  Compensation  Other    
  2020  Awards  Awards    Compensation  Earnings  Compensation  Total 
Name ($)  ($)  ($)(A)    ($)  ($)  ($)  ($) 
                        
Alexandre Zyngier $17,935   -  $  22,750 (1)   -   -   -  $40,685 
Robert Lance Cook $17,935   -  $  22,750 (1)   -   -   -  $40,685 
Michael Graves $17,935   -  $  22,750 (1)   -   -   -  $40,685 

(A)Stock Value as applicable is determined using the Black Scholes Method.

(1)On November 13, 2019, this director was granted 200,000 stock options under the 2015 Stock Option Plan as director compensation. 100,000 of the stock options vested immediately, and the remaining 100,000 stock options vested on November 13, 2020.

Compensation PoliciesCertain Beneficial Owners and Practices as they Relate to Risk Management

We attempt to make our compensation programs discretionary, balanced and focused on the long term. We believe goals and objectives of our compensation programs reflect a balanced mix of quantitative and qualitative performance measures to avoid excessive weight on a single performance measure. Our approach to compensation practices and policies applicable to employees and consultants is consistent with that followed for its executives. Based on these factors, we believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

75

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth information as of March 18, 2020, concerning, except as indicatedrequired by the footnotes below, (i) each person whom we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers, and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The table includes these persons’ beneficial ownership of common stock. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each beneficial owner listedthis Item will be provided in the table is c/o Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., 5700 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 3600, Plano, Texas 75093. We have determined beneficial ownershipan amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnishedGeneral Instruction G(3) to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws. Applicable percentage ownership is based on 145,051,666 shares of common stock outstanding at March 18, 2020 (which amount excludes the 262,001 restricted shares of common stock held by our director Alexandre Zyngier). In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding shares of common stock subject to stock options or warrants held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after March 18, 2020 and shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of other securities held by that person that are currently convertible or convertible within 60 days after March 18, 2020. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise noted, stock options and warrants referenced in the footnotes below are currently fully vested and exercisable. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with an asterisk (*).Form 10-K.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Shares Beneficially OwnedThe information required by this Item will be provided in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

  Common Stock 
Name of beneficial owner Shares   % of Class 
          
John A. Brda  2,318,322 (1)  1.60 
President, CEO, Secretary and Director         
          
Gregory McCabe  19,605,348 (2)  13.52 
Director (Chairman of the Board)         
          
Roger N. Wurtele  10,000    * 
Chief Financial Officer         
          
Robert Lance Cook  300,000 (3)  * 
Director         
          
Michael J. Graves  745,000 (4)  * 
Director         
          
Alexandre Zyngier  600,000 (5)  * 
Director         
          
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)  23,578,670    16.09 

(1)Includes 2,318,322 shares of common stock held by the John A. Brda Trust (the “Trust”). Mr. Brda is the settlor of the Trust and reserves the right to revoke the Trust without the consent of another person. Further, he is the trustee of the Trust and exercises investment control over the securities held by the Trust.

(2)Includes (a) 11,994,769 shares of common stock held directly by Mr. McCabe; (b) 797,099 shares of common stock held by G Mc Exploration, LLC (“GME”); and (c) 6,813,480 shares of common stock held by McCabe Petroleum Corporation (“MPC”). Mr. McCabe may be deemed to hold beneficial ownership of securities held by GME as a result of his ownership of 50% of the outstanding membership interests of GME, and accordingly, Mr. McCabe may be deemed to have shared voting and investment power with respect to shares owned by GME. Mr. McCabe may be deemed to hold beneficial ownership of securities held by MPC as a result of his ownership of 100% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of MPC.

(3)Includes stock options that are exercisable into 300,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Cook.

(4)Includes 145,000 shares of common stock and stock options that are exercisable into 600,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Graves.

(5)Includes stock options that are exercisable into 600,000 shares of common stock held by Mr. Zyngier.

76

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONSItem 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The information required by this Item will be provided in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

On August 13, 2020, our subsidiaries Torchlight Energy, Inc. and Torchlight Hazel, LLC (collectively, “Torchlight”) entered into an option agreement (the “Option Agreement”) with Masterson Hazel Partners, LP (“MHP”) and McCabe Petroleum Corporation, which agreement was amended on September 18, 2020. Under the agreement, in exchange for satisfying certain drilling obligations, MHP will have the option to purchase the entire Hazel Project by a date no later than May 31, 2021. MHP has satisfied all such drilling obligations. In the event MHP exercises it option to purchase the entire Hazel Project under the Option Agreement, McCabe Petroleum Corporation, which is owned by our chairman Gregory McCabe, has agreed to reduce its reversionary interest in the Hazel Project from 20% to not more than 12.5%.PART IV

On September 18, 2020, the parties entered into a First Amendment to Option Agreement, under which, the date MHP must exercise its options under the Option Agreement was extended. MHP must now exercise the options no later than February 3, 2021, subject to extension to the earlier of May 31, 2021 or the maturity date of the promissory notes held by the David A. Straz, Jr. Foundation and David A. Straz, Jr. Irrevocable Trust DTD 11/11/1986, if MHP drills the well on the southern half of the prospect, provides notice no later than February 3, 2021 of its intent to conduct operations on the northern half of the prospect and on or before February 17, 2021, conducts operations sufficient to satisfy the drilling obligations regarding the second well on the northern half of the prospect.

On September 18, 2020, McCabe Petroleum Corporation, a company owned by our chairman Gregory McCabe (“MPC”), loaned us $1,500,000, evidenced by a 6% Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “MPC Note”). The note bears interest at the rate of 6% per annum and provides for payment of the principal amount along with all accrued and unpaid interest in one lump sum payment on its maturity date of May 10, 2021. The note provided the following requirements on the use of proceeds of the loan as follows: (i) we will lend $500,000 to Metamaterial Inc. pursuant to an 8% Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note; (ii) we will retain and use $500,000 for general corporate purposes, including without limitation, expenses incurred by us in connection with the proposed business combination transaction; and (iii) we will deposit $500,000 into an escrow account, to be held in escrow. The MPC Note also provided that if we and Metamaterial enter into a definitive agreement by the later of November 2, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to by us and Metamaterial in writing, the $500,000 from this escrow account will be released to us, and we will lend this amount to Metamaterial pursuant to another convertible promissory note (the “Second Metamaterial Note”). If we do not enter into a definitive agreement by the later of November 2, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to in writing, the $500,000 from this escrow account will be released back to MPC and deducted from the principal amount outstanding under the MPC Note. The MPC Note is secured by our pledge of the Metamaterial Note and the Second Metamaterial Note (if issued). If we and Metamaterial do not enter into a definitive agreement by the later of November 2, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to in writing, then promptly after that date, we will assign to MPC the Metamaterial Note in full repayment and discharge of $500,000 (plus accrued and unpaid interested on the Metamaterial Note) of the principal amount of the MPC Note, and the remaining $500,000 (less accrued and unpaid interested on the Metamaterial Note) of the principal amount, plus all unpaid interest accrued under the MPC Note, will remain subject to the MPC Note. If a definitive agreement is entered into by the later of November 2, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to in writing, but the proposed business combination transaction is terminated prior to closing or otherwise does not close by the maturity date of the MPC Note, then we will assign to MPC both the Metamaterial Note and Second Metamaterial Note in full repayment and discharge of $1,000,000 (plus accrued and unpaid interested on the Metamaterial Note and Second Metamaterial Note) of the principal amount of the MPC Note, and the remaining $500,000 (less accrued and unpaid interested on the Metamaterial Note and Second Metamaterial Note) of the principal amount, plus all unpaid interest accrued under the MPC Note, will remain subject to the MPC Note. The MPC Note also provided that if (i) we and Metamaterial do not enter into a definitive agreement by the later of November 2, 2020 or such later date that is agreed to in writing, or (ii) we and Metamaterial enter into a definitive agreement but the proposed transaction is terminated prior to closing or otherwise does not close by the maturity date of the MPC Note, then at such time and until the maturity date, MPC will have the right, at its option, to convert up to $500,000 of the remaining principal amount of the MPC Note, plus all unpaid interest accrued under the MPC Note, into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.375 per share. Additionally, if the proposed transaction with Metamaterial closes, all principal and interest under the MPC Note will automatically convert into shares of our common stock at $0.375 per share. On January 29, 2021, Torchlight and MPC agreed to amend the MPC Note to allow MPC to convert at any time, including prior to closing of the Metamaterial transaction. On February 1, 2021, MPC converted the entire principal amount of $1.5 million of the MPC Note into common stock at its conversion price of $0.375 per share, totaling 4,000,000 shares.

On November 11, 2020 (effective November 1, 2020), our subsidiary Warwink Properties, LLC (“Warwink”) entered into and closed a letter agreement with MECO IV, LLC (“MECO”) and McCabe Petroleum Corporation (“MPC”), a company owned by our chairman Greg McCabe, which letter agreement included an Assignment, Bill of Sale and Conveyance, under which MECO purchased from Warwink and MPC (collectively, the “Sellers”) all of their right, title and interest under the Winkler Project in Winkler County, Texas for a purchase price of $450,000, with $100,000 allocated to MPC and $350,000 allocated to Warwink. Before agreeing to the above transaction, MECO required both MPC and Warwink to sell their interest in the Winkler Project. In connection with this transaction, MPC agreed to have its $100,000 portion of the purchase price paid directly to Warwink in exchange for Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. issuing it 313,480 shares of common stock.

77

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS - continuedItem 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

 

On December 30, 2020, Gregory McCabe, the chairman of Torchlight, loaned Torchlight $100,000, evidenced by a 6% Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note. The note bears interest at the rate of 6% per annum and provides for payment of the principal amount along with all accrued and unpaid interest in one lump sum payment on its maturity date, which shall be the earlier of (i) May 10, 2021 or (ii) the closing of the previously announced business combination transaction between Metamaterial Inc., an Ontario corporation headquartered in Nova Scotia, Canada (“Metamaterial”), and Torchlight. The Note also provides that the holder has the right, but not the obligation, to convert all outstanding principal and interest under the note into common stock of Torchlight at a conversion price of $1.00 per share. In January 2021, Mr. McCabe converted the entire principal amount of the $100,000 promissory note into common stock of Torchlight at its conversion price of $1.00 per share, totaling 100,000 sharesExhibit Index

Director Independence

We currently have three independent directors on our Board, Alexandre Zyngier, Michael Graves, and Robert Lance Cook. The definition of “independent” used herein is based on the independence standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC. The Board performed a review to determine the independence of these Directors and made a subjective determination as to each of these directors that no transactions, relationships, or arrangements exist that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. In making these determinations, the Board reviewed information provided by these directors with regard to each Director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth the fees paid or accrued by us for the audit and other services provided by our auditor, Briggs & Veselka Co. and our independent consultant during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

  2020  2019 
Audit Fees(1) $153,277  $162,309 
Audit Related Fees(2)  79,500   46,473 
Tax Fees(3)  32,000   47,000 
All Other Fees  -   438 
         
Total Fees $264,777  $256,220 

 

(1)Audit Fees: This category represents the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal independent accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-K and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the fiscal years.

 

(2)Audit Related Fees: This category consists of the aggregate fees billed for SOX 404 Internal Control compliance services and assurance and related services by our independent consultant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”

 

(3)Tax Fees: This category consists of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal independent consultant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

78

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS 

 

Exhibit No.

Incorporated by Reference

Description

Exhibit Number

Exhibit Description

Form

Filing Date

Filed Herewith

2.11.1.0

 

Share Exchange Agreement dated November 23, 2010. (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 24, 2010.) *

2.2Arrangement Agreement with Metamaterial Inc., dated December 14, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 14, 2020.) *
2.3Amendment to Arrangement Agreement dated February 3, 2021 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 4, 2021.) *
2.4Amendment to Arrangement Agreement dated March 11, 2021 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2021.) *
3.1Articles of Incorporation. (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2019.) *
3.2Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated December 10, 2014. (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 15, 2015.) *
3.3Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated September 15, 2015. (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 12, 2015.) *
3.4Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated August 18, 2017 (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 9, 2018.) * 
3.5Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 26, 2016.) *
10.1Farmout Agreement between Hudspeth Oil Corporation, Founders Oil & Gas, LLC and certain other parties (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2015) *
10.2Purchase and Sale Agreement with Husky Ventures, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 12, 2015) *
10.3Purchase Agreement with McCabe Petroleum Corporation for acquisition of “Hazel Project” (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 15, 2016) *
10.4Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Plan of Merger with Line Drive Energy, LLC (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017) *
10.5Purchase and Sale Agreement with Wolfbone Investments, LLC (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2017) *
10.6Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Plan of Merger with McCabe Petroleum Corporation and Warwink Properties, LLC (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2018) *
10.7Purchase Agreement with Torchlight Energy, Inc. and McCabe Petroleum Corporation (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2018) *
10.8Promissory Note for $3,250,000 by Torchlight Energy, Inc. to McCabe Petroleum Corporation (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2018) *
10.9Assignment of Farmout Agreement between Hudspeth Oil Corporation, Founders Oil & Gas, LLC and Wolfbone Investments, LLC (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2018) *
10.10Underwriting Agreement, dated April 19, 2018, between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 19, 2018) *
10.11Purchase & Settlement Agreement, dated July 24, 2018, between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., Hudspeth Oil Corporation, Founders Oil & Gas, LLC, Founders Oil & Gas Operating, LLC, Wolfbone Investments, LLC and McCabe Petroleum. Corporation (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 9, 2018) *

79

10.1216% Series C Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note (form of) dated October 17, 2018 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 18, 2018)*
10.13Underwriting Agreement, dated January 14, 2020, between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Aegis Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 14, 2020) *
10.14Conversion Agreement (form of) dated March 9, 2020 between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., Hudspeth Oil Corporation and the previous holders of 16% Series C Unsecured Convertible Promissory Notes (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2020) *
10.15Underwriting Agreement, dated May 18, 2020, between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and ThinkEquity, a division of Fordham Financial Management, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 18, 2020) *
10.16Foundation Note Amendment Agreement dated April 24, 2020 with the David A. Straz, Jr Foundation (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on June 5, 2020)
10.17Amendment to Foundation Note Amendment Agreement dated May 12, 2020 with David A. Straz, Jr. Foundation (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on June 5, 2020)
10.18Trust Note Amendment Agreement dated April 24, 2020 with The David A. Straz, Jr. Irrevocable Trust DTD 11/11/1986 (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on June 5, 2020)
10.19Amendment to Trust Note Amendment Agreement dated May 12, 2020 with the David A. Straz Jr. Irrevocable Trust DTD 11/11/1986 (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on June 5, 2020)
10.20Amended and Restated Note dated April 24, 2020 in the amount of $4,000,000 with The David A. Straz, Jr. Irrevocable Trust DTD 11/11/1986 (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on June 5, 2020)
10. 21Amended and Restated Note dated April 24, 2020 in the amount of $4,500,000 with THE David A. Straz, Jr. Irrevocable Trust DTD 11/11/1986 (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on June 5, 2020)
10.22Amended and Restated Note dated April 24, 2020 in the amount of $4,000,000 with David A. Straz, Jr. Foundation (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on June 5, 2020)
10.23Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 12, 2020, between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and the investor (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 12, 2020) *
10.24Employment Agreement with John A. Brda dated July 15, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 16, 2020) *
10.25Employment Agreement with Roger Wurtele dated July 15, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 16, 2020) *
10.26Stock Option Agreement with John A. Brda dated July 15, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 16, 2020) *
10.27Stock Option Agreement with Roger Wurtele dated July 15, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 16, 2020) *
10.28Sales Agreement, dated July 20, 2020, between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2020) *
10.29Option Agreement with Masterson Hazel Partners, LP and McCabe Petroleum Corporation dated August 13, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2020) *
10.30First Amendment to Option Agreement with Masterson Hazel Partners, LP and McCabe Petroleum Corporation dated September 18, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2020) *
10.316% Secured Convertible Promissory Note for $1,500,000 to McCabe Petroleum Corporation dated September 18, 2020 (and Amendment to Promissory Note) (Incorporated by reference from Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2020) *

80

10.32Letter agreement with McCabe Petroleum Corporation and MECO IV, LLC, dated November 11, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 16, 2020) *
10.33Form of Metamaterial Voting and Support Agreement (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 14, 2020.) *
10.346% Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note for $100,000 to Gregory McCabe, dated December 30, 2020 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 6, 2021.) *
10.35Second Amendment to Promissory Note of McCabe Petroleum Corporation dated January 29, 2021 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2021.) *
10.36Addendum #1 to Stock Option Agreement of John Brda dated January 29, 2021 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2021.) *
10.37Addendum #1 to Stock Option Agreement of Roger Wurtele dated January 29, 2021 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2021.) *
10.38Underwriting Agreement, dated February 8, 2021, between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC

10k

18-Mar-21

1.2.0

Sales Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2021, by and between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC

8k

16-Jun-21

1.2.1

Amended and Restated Sales Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2021, by and between Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC

8k

21-Jun-21

2.1.0

Arrangement Agreement between Metamaterial Inc. and Torchlight Energy Resouces, Inc., dated December 14, 2020

8k

14-Dec-20

2.1.1

Amendment to Arrangement Agreement dated February 3, 2021

8k

3-Feb-21

2.1.2

Amendment to Arrangement Agreement dated March 11, 2021

8k

11-Mar-21

2.1.3

Amendment to Arrangement Agreement dated March 31, 2021

8k

1-Apr-21

2.1.4

Amendment to Arrangement Agreement dated April 15, 2021

8k

15-Apr-21

2.1.5

Amendment to Arrangement Agreement dated May 2, 2021

8k

3-May-21

2.1.6

Amendment to Arrangement Agreement dated June 18, 2021

8k

21-Jun-21

84


2.2.0

Arrangement Agreement between Meta Materials Inc. and Nanotech Securities, dated August 4, 2021

X

3.1.0

Articles of Incorporation

10k

18-Mar-19

3.1.1

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated December 10, 2014.

10Q

15-May-15

3.1.2

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated September 15, 2015.

10Q

12-Nov-15

3.1.3

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated August 18, 2017.

10Q

9-Nov-18

3.1.4

Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Torchlight Energy Resources, Inc., dated June 14, 2021

8K

16-Jun-21

3.1.5

Certificate of Amendment related to the Reverse Stock Split and Name Change, filed June 25, 2021

8k

29-Jun-21

3.2.0

Amended and Restated Bylaws

8k

26-Oct-16

3.3.0

Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Non-Voting Preferred Stock, dated June 14, 2021, as modified by the Certificate of Correction, dated June 15, 2021

8k

16-Jun-21

3.3.1

Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Special Voting Preferred Stock, dated June 14, 2021

8k

16-Jun-21

4.1.0

Form of Investor Warrant

X

4.2.0

Form of Broker Warrant

X

4.3.1

ACOA BDP (2015) - Contract 200804 - Original Document

X

4.3.2

ACOA AIF (2015) - Contract 203260 - Original Document

X

4.3.3

ACOA BDP (2018) - Contract 211326 - Original Document

X

4.3.4

ACOA BDP (2019) - Contract 212622 - Original Document

X

4.3.5

ACOA RRRF (2021) - Contract 217574 - Original Document

X

4.6

Form of Common Stock

X

10.1.1

Highfield Park, Dartmouth, NS - Lease 20200828 - Original Document

X

10.1.1.1

Highfield Park, Dartmouth, NS - Lease 20210603 - Amendment June 1, 2021

X

10.1.1.2

Highfield Park, Dartmouth, NS - Subscription Agreement

X

10.2.0

Employment Agreement with George Palikaras, dated July 1, 2021

X

10.2.1

Employment Agreement with Kenneth Rice, dated December 11, 2020

X

10.2.2

Employment Agreement with Jonathan Waldern dated December 16, 2020

X

10.14.0

Form of Meta Materials Inc. Indemnification Agreement (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-Kform 8-k filed with the SEC on February 8, 2021.) *June 29, 2021)

��
10.398% Convertible Promissory Note for $10,000,000 issued by Metamaterial Inc. on February 18, 2021 (Incorporated by reference from Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2021.) *

 

14.1

 

X

14.0

Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference from Form S-1 filed with the SEC on May 2, 2008.) *Conduct

X

21.1.0

 

List of Subsidiaries

 

 

X

21.123.0

 

Subsidiaries
23.1

Consent of Briggs & Veselka Co.Independent Auditors

 

31.1

 

X

23.1.0

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

X

24.0

Power of Attorney

X

31.1

Certification of principal executive officer required by Rule 13a 14(1) or Rule 15d 14(a) ofPrincipal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuantAdopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X

31.2

 

31.2Certification of principal financial officer required by Rule 13a 14(1) or Rule 15d 14(a) ofPrincipal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuantAdopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X

85


32.1

 

32.1Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuantPrincipal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and2002.

X

32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of 18 U.S.C. 63.the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

101.INS

 

X

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH101.CAL

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension DefinitionsDefinition Linkbase Document

101.LAB

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE

 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded withwithin the Inline XBRL Document)document)

81

SIGNATURES

 

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

86


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this reportReport to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Torchlight Energy Resources,Meta Materials Inc.

 

 

 

Dated: March 1, 2022

By:

/s/ John A. BrdaGeorge Palikaras

By: John A. Brda

George Palikaras

President, Chief Executive Officer and

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:

Dated: March 18, 20211, 2022

By:

/s/ Ken Rice

Ken Rice

Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints George Palikaras and Ken Rice and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrantRegistrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

87


SignatureTitleDate

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

/s/ John A. Brda

 

 

 

 

John A. Brda/s/ Georgios Pallifaras

 

Director, Chief Executive Officer President and Secretary

 

March 18, 20211-Mar-22

Georgios Palikaras

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ Gregory McCabe

 

 

 

 

Gregory McCabe/s/ Kenneth Rice

 

Director (Chairman of the Board)March 18, 2021
/s/ Roger N. Wurtele
Roger N. Wurtele

Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

 

March 18, 20211-Mar-22

Kenneth Rice

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

/s/ Robert Lance Cook

 

 

 

 

Robert Lance Cook/S/ Jonathan Waldern

 

DirectorChief Technology Officer

 

March 18, 20211-Mar-22

Jonathan Waldern

 

(Principal Technology Officer)

 

 

/s/ Alexandre Zyngier

 

 

 

 

Alexandre Zyngier/s/ Ram Ramkumar

 

Chairman and Director

 

March 18, 20211-Mar-22

Ram Ramkumar

 

 

 

 

/s/ Michael J. Graves

 

 

 

 

Michael J. Graves/s/ Maurice Guitton

 

Director

 

March 18, 20211-Mar-22

Maurice Guitton

/s/ Allison Christilaw

Director

1-Mar-22

Allison Christilaw

/s/ Steen Karsbo

Director

1-Mar-22

Steen Karsbo

/s/ Eric Leslie

Director

1-Mar-22

Eric Leslie

/s/ Ken Hannah

Director

1-Mar-22

Ken Hannah

82

88