Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 10-K

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Endedfiscal year ended December 31, 20132016
     
OR
cTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transitiontransition period fromto
 
Commission file number: 001-35444
 

YELP INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware20-1854266
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

140 New Montgomery Street, 9thFloor

San Francisco, California 94105
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 908-3801

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.000001 per shareNew York Stock Exchange LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    YES  x☒     NO  o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    YES  o☐     NO  



xTable of Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   YES  ☒     NO  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  ☒     NO  o☐ 



Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerx   ☒

Accelerated filero

Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)o   ☐Smaller reporting companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     YES  o☐     NO x  ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1,297,245,543$2,076,475,388 as of June 30, 2013,2016, the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing sale price of the registrant’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange LLC reported for June 28, 2013, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.30, 2016. Excludes an aggregate of 2,068,046564,416 shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock and an aggregate of 25,677,9278,285,277 shares of the registrant’s Class B common stock held by officers, directors, affiliated stockholders and The Yelp Foundation.Foundation as of June 30, 2016. For purposes of determining whether a stockholder was an affiliate of the registrant at June 30, 2013,2016, the registrant assumed that a stockholder was an affiliate of the registrant at June 30, 2013 if such stockholder (i) beneficially owned 10% or more of the registrant’s capital stock, as determined based on public filings, and/or (ii) was an executive officer or director, or was affiliated with an executive officer or director, of the registrant at June 30, 2013.2016. Exclusion of such shares should not be construed to indicate that any such person possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the registrant or that such person is controlled by or under common control with the registrant.

As of February 24, 2014,23, 2017, there were 59,715,00079,602,606 shares of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock,common stock, par value $0.000001 per share, issued and outstanding and 11,646,826 shares of registrant’s Class B Common Stock, par value $0.000001 per share, issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10-14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Table of Contents

YELPINC.
20132016ANNUALREPORT ONFORM10-K
T
ABLE OFCONTENTS

Page
PARTI
Item 1.       Business.1
Item 1A.Risk Factors.14
Item 1.1B.Business.1
       Item 1A.Risk Factors.12
       Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.35
Item 2.32Properties.35
Item 2.3.Properties.Legal Proceedings.35
Item 4.32
       Item 3.Legal Proceedings.32
       Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.32
36
PARTII
Item 5.
       Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities.
3337
Equity Securities.Item 6.
       Item 6.Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data.38
Item 7.36
       Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.41
Item 7A.38
       Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.62
Item 8.60
       Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.62
Item 9.61
       Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.62
Item 9A.61
       Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.63
Item 9B.61
       Item 9B.Other Information.62
66
PARTIII
Item 10.
       Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.67
Item 11.63Executive Compensation.67
Item 11.12.Executive Compensation.63
       Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.67
Item 13.63
Matters.
       Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.67
Item 14.63
       Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.63
67
PARTIV
Item 15.
       Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.68
Item 16.64Form 10-K Summary.68
 
SIGNATURES6569
EXHIBITINDEX70
FINANCIALSTATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-1
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-2
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive LossIncome (Loss)F-4
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ EquityF-5
(Deficit)
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7
__________________________


Unless the context suggests otherwise, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or Annual Report,(the “Annual Report”) to “Yelp,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Yelp Inc. and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries.

    Yelp, Yelp Inc., the Yelp logo and other trade names, trademarks or service marks of Yelp appearing in this Annual Report are the property of Yelp. Trade names, trademarks and service marks of other companies appearing in this Annual Report are the property of their respective holders.

i



Table of Contents

Unless the context otherwise indicates, where we refer in this Annual Report to our “mobile application” or “mobile app,” we refer to all of our applications for mobile-enabled devices.devices; references to our “mobile platform” refer to both our mobile app and the versions of our website that are optimized for mobile-based browsers. Similarly, references to our “website” refer to versions of our website dedicated to both desktop- and mobile-based browsers, as well as the U.S. and international versions of our website, as well as the versions of our website dedicated to mobile-based browsers.website.

    In the fourth quarter of 2012, we acquired Qype GmbH, a Germany-based reviews website, and its wholly owned subsidiaries Qype LTD., Qype SARL and Qype SL, which we collectively refer to as Qype. We began including traffic, content and local business activity from each Qype market in our key metrics following our migration of such market to the Yelp platform. As of December 31, 2013, all Qype markets had been migrated to the Yelp Platform. Accordingly, the key metrics presented in this Annual Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 include the traffic, content and local business activity from the following Qype markets: Austria, Brazil, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.

ii



SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, and uncertainties as well asand assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The statements contained in this Annual Report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of words such as, but not limited to, “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions or variations intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management, which are in turn based on information currently available to management. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titledentitledRisk Factors” included under Part I, Item 1A below. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

iiiNOTE REGARDING METRICS

We review a number of performance metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends in our business, prepare financial projections and make strategic decisions. Please see the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics” for information on how we define our key metrics. Unless otherwise stated, these metrics do not include metrics from Yelp Eat24 or Yelp Reservations or from our business owner products.

While our metrics are based on what we believe to be reasonable calculations, there are inherent challenges in measuring usage across our large user base. Certain of our performance metrics, including the number of unique devices accessing our mobile app, are tracked with internal company tools, which are not independently verified by any third party and have a number of limitations. For example, our metrics may be affected by mobile applications that automatically contact our servers for regular updates with no discernible user action involved; this activity can cause our system to count the device associated with the app as an app unique device in a given period.

Our metrics that are calculated based on data from third parties — the number of desktop and mobile website unique visitors — are subject to similar limitations. Our third-party providers periodically encounter difficulties in providing accurate data for such metrics as a result of a variety of factors, including human and software errors. In addition, because these traffic metrics are tracked based on unique cookie identifiers, an individual who accesses our website from multiple devices with different cookies may be counted as multiple unique visitors, and multiple individuals who access our website from a shared device with a single cookie may be counted as a single unique visitor. As a result, the calculations of our unique visitors may not accurately reflect the number of people actually visiting our website.

Our measures of traffic and other key metrics may also differ from estimates published by third parties (other than those whose data we use to calculate such metrics) or from similar metrics of our competitors. We are continually seeking to improve our ability to measure these key metrics, and regularly review our processes to assess potential improvements to their accuracy. From time to time, we may discover inaccuracies in our metrics or make adjustments to improve their accuracy, including adjustments that may result in the recalculation of our historical metrics. We believe that any such inaccuracies or adjustments are immaterial unless otherwise stated.

ii



Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Company Overview

Yelp connects people with great local businesses. Ourbusinesses by bringing “word of mouth” online and providing a platform for businesses and consumers to engage and transact. As of December 31, 2016, our users havehad contributed a total of approximately 52.8121.0 million cumulative reviews of almost every type of local business, from restaurants, boutiques and salons to dentists, mechanics, plumbers and more. These reviews are written by people using Yelp to share their everydaymaking us the leading local business experiences, giving voicereview site in the United States.

Our platform provides value to consumers and bringing “word of mouth” online. The information these reviews provide is valuable forbusinesses alike by connecting consumers andwith great local businesses alike. Approximately 120.0 million unique visitors used our website according to Google Analytics, a product from Google, Inc. that provides digital marketing intelligence, and our mobile application was used on approximately 10.6 million unique mobile devices, on a monthly average basis during the quarter ended December 31, 2013. Businesses of all sizes use our platform to engage with consumers at the critical moment when they are deciding where to spend their money. The key strengths of our platform include:

Discovery.Our platform is transforming the way people discover local businesses. Each day, millions of consumers visit our website or use our mobile app to find great local businesses to meet their everyday needs. Our strong brand and the quality of our content have enabled us to attract this large audience with relatively low traffic acquisition costs.

Engagement.Yelp provides a platform for consumers to share their everyday local business experiences with other consumers by posting reviews, tips, photos and videos, and to engage directly with businesses, through reviews, our Request-A-Quote and Message the Business features, and by completing transactions on the Yelp Platform. Yelp also provides businesses of all sizes with a variety of free and paid services that help them engage with consumers.Businesses can register a business account for free and “claim” the Yelp business listing page for each of their locations, allowing them to provide additional information about their business and respond to reviews, among other features.

Advertising.Businesses that want to reach our large audience of purchase intent-driven consumers can also pay for premium services to promote themselves through targeted search advertising, discounted offers and further enhancements to their business listing pages. We generate revenue primarily from the sale of advertising on our website and mobile app to businesses. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we generated net revenue of $713.1 million, representing 30% growth over 2015, a net loss of $4.7 million and adjusted EBITDA of $120.1 million. For information on how we define and calculate adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to net income (loss), see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures” in this Annual Report.

Transactions.The Yelp Platform allows consumers to transact with local businesses directly on Yelp through Yelp Eat24, the food ordering and delivery business we acquired in 2015, Yelp Reservations, our online reservations product, and integrations with partners ranging from Shoptiques.com (boutique shopping) to GolfNow (tee time booking) to BloomNation (flower ordering). In addition to providing consumers with a continuous experience from discovery to completion of transactions, the Yelp Platform creates an additional point of consumer engagement for local businesses.

At the heart of our business revolves around three key constituencies:are the communities of contributors who write reviews, the consumers who read them and the local businesses that they describe.

Contributors.We foster and support vibrant communities of contributors in local markets acrossthat contribute the United States, Canada, Europe, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and Brazil.content on our platform. These contributors provide rich, firsthand information about local businesses such as reviews, tips, ratings and photos.

Consumers.Our platform is transformingin the way people discover local businesses and is attracting a large audienceform of geographically and demographically diverse consumers. Every day, millions of consumers visit our website or use our mobile app to find great local businesses. Our strong brand and the quality of the reviews and other content on our platform have enabled us to attract this large audience with almost no traffic acquisition costs.

Local Businesses.Our platform provides businesses with a variety of freeratings, tips, photos and paid services that help them engage with consumers at the critical moment when they are deciding where to spend their money. Businesses can register a business account for free and “claim” the Yelp business page for each of their locations, allowing them to enhance the page with additional information about their businesses and respond to consumer reviews, among other features. We refer to an individual business location as a “local business.” Businesses can also pay for premium services to promote themselves through targeted search advertising, discounted offers and further enhancements to their business page. We also offer display advertising and brand sponsorships for national brands that want to improve their local presence.

Powerful Network Effect.Our platform helps people find great local businesses to meet their everyday needs. As more people use our platform, more of them write reviews, add photos, tips and other content.videos. Each review, tip, photo or tip that a user contributes helps expandand video expands the breadth and depth of the content on our platform, drawingwhich drives a powerful network effect: the expanded content draws in more consumers and more prospective contributors. This increaseAlthough measures of our content (including our cumulative review metric) and traffic (including our desktop and mobile unique visitors metrics) do not factor directly into the advertising arrangements we have with our advertising customers, this network effect underpins our ability to deliver clicks and ad impressions to advertisers. Increases in consumer traffic and content improvesthese metrics improve our value proposition to local businesses as they seek low-cost, easy-to-use and effective advertising solutions to target a large numbersolutions. For this reason, we foster and support communities of intent-driven consumers.

Yelp Mobile.We help consumerscontributors and make decisions on the go through bothconsumer experience our mobile app and versions of our website dedicated to mobile-based browsers, which we refer to as our mobile website. Our mobile app accounted for approximately 46% of all searches on our platform in the quarter ended December 31, 2013, and approximately 35% of our unique visitors in the quarter ended December 31, 2013 were to our mobile website. We expect mobile device usage to continue to grow and believe that use of our mobile app and mobile website are complementary to the use of our desktop website. However, if mobile device usage is substituting for, rather than incremental to, usage of our website on personal computers and our mobile advertising solutions prove ineffective, this trend could adversely impact our business.highest priority.

1




As our community has grown and our product offerings have expanded, we have seen significant growth in reviews, traffic, claimed local business locations and active local business accounts:

The approximately 52.8 million cumulative reviews contributed to our users contributed through December 31, 2013platform cover a wide set of local business categories, including restaurants, shopping, beauty and fitness, arts, entertainment and events, home and local services, health, nightlife, travel and hotel, auto and other categories. We believe this breadth of content across business categories provides consumers with a wide-ranging selection of reviewed businesses as they search across many categories. WeIn the charts below, we highlight below the breakdown by industry of local businesses that have received reviews on our platform and the breakdown by industry of reviews contributed to our platform through December 31, 2013. The charts below2016.




Table of Contents



*     

The charts above include information based upon all contributed reviews and include some businesses that have received only reviews that are not recommended or have been removed.

We believe that the concentration of reviews in the restaurant and include someshopping categories in particular is primarily due to the frequency with which individuals visit specific businesses that have only received reviews that are not recommended or have been removed.

2



    We generate revenue primarily fromengage in certain activities versus others. For example, an individual may eat at a restaurant three times in one week or go shopping once a week, but the sale of advertising on our website and mobile appsame individual is unlikely to visit a mechanic, get a haircut or use a home or local businesses of all sizes that seek to reach our growing audience of consumers. Duringservice with the year ended December 31, 2013, we generated net revenue of $233.0 million, representing 69% growth over 2012, a net loss of $10.1 million and an adjusted EBITDA of $29.4 million. For information on how we define and calculate number of contributed reviews, unique visitors, claimed local business locations, active local business accounts and adjusted EBITDA, and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net loss, see “Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Datain this Annual Report.same frequency. The top five industry categories accounted for an aggregate of approximately 75%77% of our local advertising revenue (excluding advertising sold by partners) for the quarter ended December 31, 2013,2016, broken down as follows: Home & Local Services, 24%30%; Restaurants, 16%15%; Beauty & Fitness, 14%12%; Health, 11%; and Shopping, 10%9%.

Our GrowthProducts

Advertising

We provide both free and paid business listing products to businesses of all sizes. We also enable businesses to deliver targeted search advertising to large local audiences through our website and mobile app.

In our filings with the SEC prior to this Annual Report we classified revenue from our “local” products — consisting of business listing and advertising products that we sold directly to businesses and Yelp Reservations — as local revenue. In order to bring our revenue presentation into closer alignment with the operation of our business, we now classify revenue from all of our business listing and advertising products, including advertising sold by partners, as advertising revenue. As a result, revenue generated through ad resales and monetization of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks is now classified as advertising revenue rather than other services revenue, and revenue from Yelp Reservations, a subscription service, is classified as other services revenue. All disclosures relating to revenue by product have been updated to reflect this revised classification for all periods presented.



Table of Contents

       Free Online Business Account

We enable businesses to create a free online business account and claim the listing page for each of their business locations. With their free business accounts, businesses can view trends (e.g. statistics and charts of the performance of their pages on our platform), use the Revenue Estimator tool (e.g. to quantify the revenue opportunity Yelp provides), message customers (e.g. by replying to messages or reviews either publicly or privately), update information (e.g. address, hours of operation) and offer Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates (as described below).

       Enhanced Profile

Our enhanced profile solution eliminates ads from a business’s listing page and allows the business to incorporate a video clip or photo slide show on the page. Businesses can also promote a desired transaction of their choosing — such as scheduling an appointment or printing a coupon — directly on their business listing pages with our Call to Action feature. This feature transfers consumers from a business’s listing page to the business’s own website to complete the action.

       Branded Profile

For businesses with ten or more locations, our branded profile solution offers the ability to incorporate a video clip or photo slide show, as well as a Call to Action button, on each location’s business listing page.

       Search and Other Ads

We allow businesses to promote themselves as a sponsored search result on our platform and on the listing pages of related businesses. We now sell ads primarily on a per-click basis, though we also offer impression-based ads.

       Ad Resales

We also generate revenue through the resale of our advertising products by certain agencies and partners, such as YP.com, as well as monetization of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks.


Transactions

In addition to our advertising products, we also offer several features and consumer-interactive tools to facilitate transactions between consumers and the local businesses they find on Yelp. We recognize revenue from these sources on a net basis as transactions revenue.

       Yelp Eat24

Our Yelp Eat24 business generates revenue through arrangements with restaurants in which restaurants pay a commission percentage fee on orders placed through the Yelp Eat24 platform.

       Yelp Platform

The Yelp Platform allows consumers to transact directly on Yelp through integrations with partners including Nowait, Whittl, and TicketNetwork.Consumers are currently able to check wait times and join waitlists remotely, book spa and salon appointments and purchase event tickets, among many other transaction opportunities, all without leaving Yelp.

       Yelp Deals

Our Yelp Deals product allows local business owners to create promotional discounted deals for their products and services, which are marketed to consumers through our platform. We typically earn a fee based on the discounted price of each deal sold. We process all customer payments and remit to the business the revenue share of any Yelp Deal purchased.




Table of Contents

       Gift Certificates

Our Gift Certificates product allows local business owners to sell full-price gift certificates directly to consumers through their business listing pages. The business chooses the price point to offer (from $10 to $500), and consumers may purchase Gift Certificates denominated in such amounts. We earn a fee based on the amount of the Gift Certificate sold. We process all consumer payments and remit to the business the revenue share of any Gift Certificate purchased.

Brand

Through the end of 2015, we also offered advertising solutions for national brands in the form of display advertisements and brand sponsorships. We phased out these products over the second half of 2015 and redeployed the associated internal resources, including members of our brand sales team, elsewhere within our organization. Due to certain negative trends in the broader market for brand advertising products — in particular, the shift toward programmatic advertising and increasing advertiser demand for products such as video ads that are disruptive to the consumer experience — we believe this decision will provide us with a long-term strategic advantage by allowing us to focus on our core strength of advertising to local businesses and to ensure that we continue to provide a great consumer experience. We recognized revenue from these products as brand revenue through the end of 2015.

Other Services

We generate other revenue through subscription services, licensing payments for access to Yelp data and other non-advertising, non-transaction arrangements, such as certain partnerships. We recognize revenue from these sources as other services revenue.

In our filings with the SEC prior to this Annual Reportother services revenue consisted of revenue generated through partner arrangements, including resale of our advertising products by certain partners, and monetization of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks. As described above, for all reporting periods presented, revenue generated from resale of our advertising products and monetization of remnant advertising inventory is now classified as advertising revenue rather than other services revenue. In addition, other services revenue now includes revenue generated from our Yelp Reservations product.

       Yelp Reservations

We provide restaurants, nightlife and certain other venues with the ability to offer online reservations directly from their Yelp business listing pages through our Yelp Reservations product, which also includes front-of-house management tools. We offer this product as a monthly subscription service.

       Yelp Knowledge

Our Yelp Knowledge program offers local analytics and insights through access to our historical data, and is available through integrations with companies including Sprinklr, Reputology and Revinate.

       Other Partnerships

Other non-advertising partner arrangements include content licensing.


Revenue by Product

The following table provides a breakdown of our revenue by product for the years indicated, reflecting the changes to our revenue categories made in the three months ended December 31, 2016:



Table of Contents

     Year Ended December 31,
2016     2015     2014
(dollars in thousands)
Net revenue by product:
       Advertising$645,241$471,416$335,450
       Transactions62,49543,8545,247
       Brand advertising-31,01234,482
       Other services5,3333,4292,357
              Total net revenue$     713,069$     549,711$     377,536

For purposes of comparison, the following table provides a breakdown of our revenue by product for the years indicated based on our revenue categories in effect prior to the three months ended December 31, 2016:

     Year Ended December 31,
2016     2015     2014
(dollars in thousands)
Net revenue by product:
       Local$624,694$448,236$319,137
       Transactions62,49543,8545,247
       Brand advertising-31,01234,482
       Other services25,88026,60918,670
              Total net revenue$     713,069$     549,711$     377,536

Our Strategy

Our mission is to connect people with great local businesses. We intend to grow our platform and our business by focusingfocus on the following key growth strategies:

Growth in Existing Markets



Provide a Great Consumer Experience.We believe that providing a great consumer experience has been and will continue to be critical to growing our business; accordingly, as we explore opportunities to monetize our products, we remain committed to a high standard of user experience. We will not incorporate advertising or other products or solutions that we believe may excessively degrade the user experience and potentially alienate users, even if they might result in increased short-term monetization. We also plan to continue our consumer protection efforts. In 2016, for example, we expanded the municipal hygiene inspection data available on business listing pages and our consumer alerts program. We also supported federal legislation banning “gag clause” provisions in consumer-form contracts that seek to prevent consumers from writing negative reviews online, which was signed into law as The Consumer Review Fairness Act of 2016.

Focus on Transactions. As of December 31, 2016, we were recognizing advertising revenue from approximately 137.8 thousand advertising and subscription accounts (formerly referred to as local advertising accounts); with approximately 3.4 million businesses on our platform as of that date, we believe there is significant opportunity to increase the number of businesses advertising on Yelp. We believe the continued expansion of our transaction capabilities will not only drive further consumer engagement, but also attract additional business customers. To that end, in 2016, we expanded the number of transactions-enabled businesses and categories, streamlined the checkout process and made our Request-A-Quote feature available to logged-out traffic, allowing millions more consumers to seamlessly connect with merchants and service providers. In 2017, we plan to continue to innovate and explore ways to expand our transactions functionalities, as well as promote our existing capabilities through direct marketing.

Attract More Businesses. In addition to expanding our transactions capabilities, we believe that new business owner products and comprehensive tools to measure the effectiveness of our products will encourage businesses to advertise on our platform. For example, in 2016, we launched new reporting, messaging and advertising-management features for our Yelp for Business Owners app. We will also continue our local business outreach efforts, which include educating local businesses on how Yelp provides value to them as well as engaging with business owners to gain insight into how we can improve our products and services. In 2016, we held our second annual business leader summit, which brought 100 entrepreneurs representing 80 communities in the United States and Canada to our offices for two days of conversation and strategizing, and joined the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Technology Coalition to help small businesses better leverage technology by providing digital education and resources.

Broaden Sales Strategy.Our core strength is our advertising business in the United States and Canada. This business has a significant and growing base of revenue, and we plan to continue to pursue initiatives to enhance our opportunity in this area. We have invested, and will continue to invest, aggressively in sales resources, including increases in headcount and initiatives to increase sales force productivity. In addition to growing our established direct sales force, we are broadening our sales strategy to address the revenue opportunity from existing customers, new advertisers and new products. This includes developing new and evolving sales channels, such as our self-serve advertising channel, which provides business owners with convenient options for purchasing our products, and partnerships with select marketing agencies and resellers to provide large and medium-sized advertisers with greater access to our products. We believe these ongoing investments will lead to additional businesses advertising on Yelp.

Expand Our Portfolio of Revenue-Generating Products. We plan to continue to grow and develop products and partner arrangements that provide incremental value to our advertisers and business partners to encourage them to increase their advertising budgets allocated to our platform. In 2016, for example, we began monetizing Yelp data through our Yelp Knowledge program, which offers local analytics and insights through access to our historical data.



Table of Contents

Marketing

Expand to New Geographic MarketsCommunity Management

Platform Expansion

Enhance Monetization

4



Market Development Strategy

    As of December 31, 2013, we were active in 61 Yelp markets inoutside the United States and 56Canada, where we believe the long-term return on continued investment to be lower than opportunities for Yelp markets internationally. This footprint represents a small fraction of the potential markets that wewithin our core markets.

Our community management team’s primary goals are currently targeting for expansion. Our market development strategy consists of the following:

Identification.We select new markets based on a number of different city- or country-specific criteria, including, but not limited to population size,support and grow their local gross domestic product, pre-existing base of reviews on our platform, Internet and wireless penetration, proximity to existing markets, number of local businesses and local ad market growth rate.

Preparation and Launch.Before launching a market in any country, we license business listing information from third-party data providers and create individual pages for each business location in the entire country. During this pre-launch preparation phase, we sometimes hire temporary local employees, called “scouts,” to provide additional rich content, such as reviews, photos and hours of operation. To bolster the integrity of the content they provide, we closely monitor their contributions to the platform, prohibit them from reviewing businesses with which they have a conflict of interest and identify them in their public profiles as paid contributors. At launch, consumers can read and write reviews about any business on our platform and contribute information about businesses that are not already listed. We have active Yelp markets in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Growth.After launch, we focus on attracting a communitycommunities of contributors, consumersraise brand awareness and local businesses to our platform. In each Yelp market, we hire a Community Manager, whose primary responsibilities include:

their surrounding communities through:

planning and executing fun and engaging events for the community, such as parties, outings and activities at restaurants, museums, hotels and other local places of interest;

getting to know community members and helping them get to know one another to foster an offline community experience that can be transferred online;

promoting Yelp, including guest appearances on local television and radio, and at local events such as concerts and street fairs; and

writing weekly e-mail newsletters to share information with the community about local businesses, events and activities.

Through these activities, we believe Community Managers helpour community management team helps us increase awareness of our platform and buildgrow avid communities of users who are willing to contribute content to our platform. These active contributors may be invited to attend sponsored social events, but do not receive compensation. In time, thiscompensation for their contributions. This community growth drives athe network effect whereby contributed reviews expand the breadth and depth of our reviewcontent base. This expansion draws an increasing number of consumers to access the content on our platform, thus inspiring new and existing contributors to create additional reviews that can be shared with this growing audience.

Scale.At scale, our platform reaches a critical mass of reviews, consumers and claimed local business accounts, and we begin an active sales effort with local businesses. Thereafter, our largest expense is related to sales efforts to attract local business advertising customers. In Yelp markets that have attained this level of development, we expect to achieve economies of scale and operating cost leverage.

5



To further illustrate the development of our marketsYelp communities as they scale, we highlight below our review and revenue metrics for three cohorts of Yelp marketscommunities in the United States: the Yelp marketscommunities that we launched in 2005-2006; the Yelp marketscommunities that we launched in 2007-2008; and the Yelp marketscommunities that we launched in 2009-2010. In the markets we have entered, review growth and consumer activity are generally followed by revenue generated from local businesses.

Year-Over-AverageYear-Over-Year-Over-
YearCumulativeYear GrowthAverageYear Growth in
Year-Over-YearGrowth inReviews as ofin AverageAdvertisingAverage
           Average     Growth in     Average Local     AverageNumber of Yelpend ofCumulativeRevenue inAdvertising
Number Cumulative AverageAdvertisingLocal
U.S. Market of YelpReviewsCumulative Revenue Advertising
CohortMarkets(1)in 2013(2)Reviews(3)in 2013(4)Revenue(5)
U.S. Market Cohort     Communities(1)     Q4 2016(2)     Reviews(3)     Q4 2016(4)     Revenue(5)
2005 – 2006 Cohort63,61935%14,29053%67,54324%$10,98530%
2007 – 2008 Cohort1476635%3,60073%141,71127%$3,32837%
2009 – 2010 Cohort1824047%801102%1863533%$88335%

(1)A Yelp marketcommunity is defined as a city or region in which we have hired a Community Manager.


Table of Contents

(2)     Average cumulative reviews is defined as the total cumulative reviews of the cohort as of December 31, 20132016 (in thousands), including the reviews that were not recommended or had been removed from our platform, divided by the number of Yelp marketscommunities in the cohort.
(3)Year-over-year growth in average cumulative reviews compares the average cumulative reviews as of December 31, 20132016 with the average cumulative reviews as of December 31, 2012.
2015.
(4)Average local advertising revenue is defined as the total local advertising revenue from businesses in the cohort for the yearquarter ended December 31, 20132016 (in thousands), divided by the number of Yelp marketscommunities in the cohort.
(5)Year-over-year growth in average local advertising revenue compares localaverage advertising revenue for the yearquarter ended December 31, 20132016 with localthe average advertising revenue for the yearquarter ended December 31, 2012.2015.

    For a table showing the year of launch of each of the Yelp markets we have entered since 2008, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition—Overview.” In general, the Yelp marketscommunities in our earlier U.S. marketcommunity cohorts are more populous than those in later cohorts, and we have already entered many of the largest marketscities in the United States.States and Canada. For these and other reasons, further expansion intolaunching additional U.S. marketscommunities may not yield results similar to those of our existing U.S. markets.communities. As a result, we continue to believe that development of our existing communities currently provides the greatest opportunity for growth, and plan to focus our community development efforts on existing communities in 2017.

Advertising

We have made a significant investment in supporthistorically focused on organic and viral growth driven by the community development efforts of our marketcommunity management team, as described above. While community development initiatives. Forcontinues to be our primary marketing strategy, we believe there is significant opportunity to increase our brand awareness and usage through targeted advertising programs. We began selectively testing advertising to consumers in the year endedsecond half of 2014, and launched our first television advertising campaign in 2015, with the aim of increasing consumer awareness of our brand. We plan to continue investing in various advertising channels in 2017, with a greater portion of our advertising budget allocated to performance advertising with the objectives of increasing app usage, transaction volumes and new business customers. Our marketing expenses may continue to increase if we significantly expand these efforts to attract additional consumers and businesses.

Sales

We sell our products directly through our sales force, indirectly through partners and online through our website. Our advertising sales force consisted of 2,450 employees as of December 31, 2013,2016 and is located across our offices in San Francisco, California; Scottsdale, Arizona; New York, New York; and Chicago, Illinois. From 2012 to 2016, we also had sales operations in Europe, including in Dublin, Ireland and Hamburg, Germany. In the fourth quarter of 2016, however, we wound down our sales activities in markets outside the United States and marketing expenses were $132.0 million, an increase of approximately 54% overCanada, where we believe the year ended December 31, 2012. Over the same period, total net revenue also increased by approximately 69%. Because mostlong-term return on continued investment to be lower than opportunities for Yelp within our core markets.

Direct Sales. A large majority of our costssales force is dedicated to selling our advertising products, with a significantly smaller component responsible for selling Yelp Eat24 and expenses relateYelp Reservation products. Sales representatives are primarily responsible for generating qualified sales leads by identifying and contacting businesses through direct engagement, direct marketing campaigns and weekly e-mails to personnelclaimed local businesses. Our direct sales force is focused on increasing revenue by adding new customers, and activities that support multiple markets,sales representatives are typically compensated on the basis of advertising sold in a given period.

Sales Partnerships.Since 2014, we do not record costshave allowed our partners such as YP.com to sell certain of our advertising products as part of a package with their own advertising products to its advertiser bases. The products covered by these arrangements include our enhanced profile and expenses separatelycost-per-click advertising. We continue to explore additional partnerships for the sale or bundling of our products, as well as with select marketing agencies.

Self-Service Ads. Our online, or self-service, sales channel allows businesses to purchase advertising solutions directly from our website. Businesses can purchase performance-based cost-per-click sponsored search advertising directly through this channel. We are continuing to test approaches to this sales channel, including by market or cohort.offering the option of speaking with a sales representative.



ProductsTable of Contents

Local AdvertisingAccount Management.

    We provide both free and paid business listing products to businessesWhile the focus of all sizes. In addition, we enable businesses to deliver targeted search advertising to large local audiences through our website and mobile app. We recognize revenue from these products as local advertising revenue.

Free Online Business Account

We enable businesses to create a free online business account and claim the page for each of their business locations. Business representatives can verify their affiliation with the business through an automated telephone verification process, which requires that they be reachable at the phone number that is publicly displayed for their business listing on our platform. With their free business accounts, businesses can view business trends (e.g., statistics and charts reflecting the performance of a business’s page on our platform), use the Revenue Estimator tool (e.g., to quantify the revenue opportunity Yelp provides), messagesales force has historically been on adding new customers, (e.g., by replying to reviews either publicly or privately), update information (e.g., address, hours of operation) and offer Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates (as described below).

Enhanced Listing

Our enhanced listing solution eliminates search advertising from the businesses’ profile pages and allows them to incorporate a video clip or photo slide show on the pages.

Search and Other Ads

We allow businesses to promote themselves as a sponsored search result on our platform and on the listing pages of related businesses. We typically sell businesses a fixed number of these ad impressions per month, but also offer a “cost-per-click” program.

Call to Action

Our Call to Action feature allows businesses to promote a desired transaction of their choosing, such as scheduling an appointment or printing a coupon, directly on their business listing page. The feature takes consumers directly from the business’s listing page to the business’s own website to complete the action.


Brand Advertising

    We offer advertising solutions for national brands that want to improve their local presence in the form of display advertisements and brand sponsorships. Our national advertisers include leading brands in the automobile, financial services, logistics, consumer goods and health and fitness industries. We recognize revenue from these products as brand advertising revenue.

Traditional Display Advertising

We offer both graphic and text display advertisements on our website and mobile app. We typically sell these ads on a per-impression basis.

Brand Sponsorships

Our fixed-price brand sponsorships provide businesses with exclusivity over a section or advertising placement on Yelp for a fixed period of time. Brand sponsorships are generally associated with a particular platform — desktop, mobile web or mobile app — and are short in duration.



Other Services

    In addition to our business listing and advertising products, we also offer several featuressee opportunity to deepen our relationships with existing customers. To this end, our account management team supports existing business advertisers through client success, cross-selling and consumer-interactive tools to facilitate transactions between consumers and the great local businesses they find on Yelp. We recognize revenue from these sources as other services revenue.

Yelp Platform

The Yelp Platform allows consumers to transact directly on Yelp. Through partnerships with Eat24 and delivery.com, consumers are currently able to complete food delivery transactions on Yelp. We have also announced partnerships that we expect to go live in 2014 that will provide consumers with the ability to complete transactions ranging from scheduling yoga sessions to making dentist appointments, all without leaving the Yelp Platform.

Online Reservations

We provide restaurants and nightlife venues with the ability to offer online reservations directly from their Yelp business listing pages through our SeatMe feature. Our partnership with OpenTable also provides consumers with the ability to reserve seats directly on business listing pages of restaurants that participate in OpenTable’s network.

Yelp Deals

Our Yelp Deals product allows local business owners to create promotional discounted deals for their products and services, which are marketed to consumers through our platform. Yelp Deals typically have a fee structure based solely on transaction volume with no upfront costs, and we typically earn a fee based on the discounted price of each deal sold. We process all customer payments and remit to the business the revenue share of any Yelp Deal purchased. We primarily offer deals on our platform that are focused on demand fulfillment where businesses can target intent-driven consumers who are specifically searching for a product or service on our platform.

Gift Certificates

Our Gift Certificates product allows local business owners to sell full-price gift certificates directly to customers through their business profile page. The business chooses the price points to offer (from $10 to $500), and the buyer may purchase a Gift Certificate in one of those amounts. We earn a fee based on the amount of the Gift Certificate sold. We process all consumer payments and remit to the business the revenue share of any Gift Certificate purchased.


    The following table provides a breakdownretention initiatives. Members of our revenue by product for the years indicated:account management team are currently compensated primarily through fixed salaries rather than on commissions.

Year Ended December 31, 
     2013     2012     2011 
Percentage of total net revenue by product:
      Local advertising83%79%70%
      Brand advertising1215 21
      Other services 5 69
             Total     100%     100%     100%



Technology

Product development and innovation are core pillars of our strategy. We aim to delight our users and business partners with our products. We provide our web-based and mobile services using a combination of in-house and third-party technology solutions and products.

Sales and Marketing

    We have a team of Community Managers based in 117 Yelp markets in the United States and internationally, whose primary goals are to build a local community of contributors, raise brand awareness, organize events for the best contributors in their respective cities and engage with the surrounding community. These efforts foster and support vibrant communities of contributors in local markets across the United States, Canada, Europe, Singapore, New Zealand, Australia and Brazil. We believe that continuing to serve our contributors is a critical factor in improving the value of our platform and facilitating the network effect that has helped to attract approximately 120.0 million unique visitors,by clicking on a monthly average basis for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, to our website with almost no traffic acquisition costs.



    Our sales force is concentrated in five primary locations: San Francisco, California; Scottsdale, Arizona; New York City, New York; London, the United Kingdom; and Hamburg, Germany. Our sales force primarily focuses on gaining new active local business accounts by identifying and contacting local businesses through direct engagement, direct marketing campaigns and weekly emails to claimed local businesses. A smaller component of our sales force is also responsible for attracting national brand advertisers to our platform.

Competition

    We compete for consumer traffic with traditional, offline local business guides and directories and with other online providers of local and web searchlink on the basis of a number of factors, including the reliability of our content, breadth, depth and timeliness of information and the strength and recognition of our brand. We also compete for a share of local businesses’ overall advertising budgets with traditional, offline media companies and other Internet marketing providers on the basis of a number of factors, including our large consumer audience, effectiveness of our advertising solutions, our pricing structure and recognition of our brand. Our competitors include the following types of businesses:

Culture and Employees

    We take great pride in our company culture and consider it to be one of our competitive strengths. Our culture helps drive our business forward and is a part of everything we do; it allows us to attract and retain a talented group of employees, create an energetic work environment and continue to innovate in a highly competitive market.

    Our culture extends beyond our offices and into the local communities in which people use Yelp. Our full-time Community Managers’ responsibilities include supporting the sharing of experiences by consumers in the local market that they serve and increasing brand awareness. In addition, we organize events several times a year to recognize our most important contributors, fostering face-to-face interaction, building the Yelp brand and fostering the sense of true community in which we believe so strongly. Our culture is at the foundation of our success, and our core values remain a pivotal part of our everyday operations.

business’s listing page. As of December 31, 2013, we2016, approximately 7% of the reviews submitted to our platform had 1,984 full-time employees globally. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.

The Yelp Foundation

    In November 2011, our board of directors approved the establishment of The Yelp Foundation, a non-profit organization designed to support consumers and businesses in the communities in which we operate. In the quarter ended December 31, 2011, our board of directors approved the contribution and issuance to The Yelp Foundation of 520,000 shares of our common stock, of which The Yelp Foundation has sold an aggregate of 75,000 shares, including 50,000 shares in our initial public offering. The Yelp Foundation currently holds 445,000 shares of Class B common stock, representing less than 1% of our outstanding capital stock. We did not make any contributions in 2013 and we do not expect to make future contributions to The Yelp Foundation.been removed.



Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

We rely on federal, state, common law and international rights, as well as contractual restrictions, to protect our intellectual property. We control access to our proprietary technology and algorithms by entering into confidentiality and inventioninventions assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, andas well as confidentiality agreements with third parties.

In addition to these contractual arrangements, we also rely on a combination of patent, trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, service marks and domain names to protect our intellectual property. We pursue the registration of our copyrights, trademarks, service marks and domain names in the United States and in certain locations outside the United States.internationally. Our registration efforts have focused on gaining protection of our trademarks for Yelp and the Yelp burst logo, among others. These marks are material to our business and essential to our brand identity as they enable others to easily identify us as the source of the services offered under these marksmarks. We currently have limited patent protection for our core business, which may make it more difficult to assert certain of our intellectual property rights. For example, the contractual restrictions and are essential totrade secrets that protect our brand identity.proprietary technology and algorithms provide only a limited safeguard against infringement.

Circumstances outside our control could pose a threat to our intellectual property rights. For example, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in the United States or other countries in which we operate. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete. Also, protectingProtecting our intellectual property rights is also costly and time-consuming.time consuming. Any unauthorized disclosure or use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business and harm our operating results.

Companies in the Internet, technology and media and other industries may own large numbers of patents copyrights and trademarksother intellectual property rights, and may frequently request license agreements or threaten to enter into litigation or file suit against us based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual propertysuch rights. From time to time, we receive notice letters from patent holders alleging that certain of our products and services infringe their patent rights. We are also currently subject to, and expect to face in the future, allegations that we have infringed the trademarks, copyrights, patents and other intellectual property rights of third parties, including our competitors and non-practicing entities. As we face increasing competition and as our business grows, we will likely face more claims of infringement.

Competition

The market for information regarding local businesses and advertising is intensely competitive and rapidly changing. We compete for consumer traffic with traditional, offline local business guides and directories as well as online providers of local and web search. We also compete for a share of businesses’ overall advertising budgets with traditional, offline media companies and other Internet marketing providers. Our competitors include the following types of businesses:

Offline.Competitors include offline media companies and service providers, many of which have existing relationships with businesses. Services provided by competitors range from yellow pages listings to direct mail campaigns to advertising and listing services in local newspapers, magazines, television and radio.

Online. Competitors also include Internet search engines, such as Google and Bing, review and social media websites as well as various other online service providers. These include regional websites that may have strong positions in particular markets.

Our competitors may enjoy competitive advantages, such as greater name recognition, longer operating histories, substantially greater market share, established marketing relationships with, and access to, large existing user bases and substantially greater financial, technical and other resources. These companies may use these advantages to offer products similar to ours at a lower price, develop different products to compete with our current solutions and respond more quickly and effectively than we do to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or client requirements. Certain competitors could also use strong or dominant positions in one or more markets to gain competitive advantage against us in markets in which we operate.

We compete on the basis of a number of factors. We compete for consumer traffic on the basis of factors including: the reliability of our content; the breadth, depth and timeliness of information; and the strength and recognition of our brand. We compete for businesses’ advertising budgets on the basis of factors including: the size of our consumer audience; the effectiveness of our advertising solutions; our pricing structure; and recognition of our brand.



Table of Contents

Government Regulation

As a company conducting business on the Internet, we are subject to a numbervariety of foreignlaws in the United States and domesticabroad that involve matters central to our business, including laws and regulations relating toregarding privacy, data retention, distribution of user-generated content, consumer protection information security, data protection and privacy, among other things. In the area of information security and data protection, for example, the laws in several states require companies to implement specific information security controls to protect certain types of information. Likewise, all but a few states have laws in place requiring companies to notify users if there is a security breach that compromises certain categories of their information. Foreign data protection, privacy, and other laws and regulations can be more restrictive than those in the United States.Any failure on our part to comply with these laws may subject us to significant liabilities.among others. For example:

Privacy.Because we receive, store and process personal information and other user data, including credit card information in certain cases, we are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws around the world regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, processing, disclosure and protection of personal information and other user data.

Liability for Third-Party Action.We rely on laws limiting the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties.

Advertising. We are subject to a variety of laws, regulations and guidelines that regulate the way we distinguish paid search results and other types of advertising from unpaid search results.

Information Security and Data Protection.The laws in many jurisdictions require companies to implement specific information security controls to protect certain types of information. Likewise, many jurisdictions have laws in place requiring companies to notify users if there is a security breach that compromises certain categories of their information.

Many of these laws and regulations are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. The application and interpretation of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate, andoperate. They may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country and inconsistently with our current policies and practices. ThereFor example, regulatory frameworks for privacy issues are alsocurrently in flux worldwide, and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. Similarly, laws providing immunity to websites that publish user-generated content are currently being tested by a number of legislative proposals pending beforeclaims, including actions based on invasion of privacy and other torts, unfair competition, copyright and trademark infringement and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the ads posted or the content provided by users. Changes in existing laws or regulations or their interpretations, as well as new legislation or regulations, could increase our administrative costs and make it more difficult for consumers to use our platform, resulting in less traffic and revenue. Such changes could also make it more difficult for us to provide effective advertising tools to businesses on our platform, resulting in fewer advertisers and less revenue.

As our business grows and evolves, we will also become subject to additional laws and regulations, including in jurisdictions outside of the United States. Foreign data protection, privacy and other laws and regulations can be more restrictive than those in the United States. Any failure on our part to comply with these laws may subject us to significant liabilities.

Our Culture and Employees

We take great pride in our company culture and consider it to be one of our competitive strengths. Our culture is at the foundation of our success, and it continues to help drive our business forward as a pivotal part of our everyday operations. It allows us to attract and retain a talented group of employees, create an energetic work environment and continue to innovate in a highly competitive market. As of December 31, 2016, we had 4,256 full-time employees globally.

Our culture extends beyond our offices and into the local communities in which people use Yelp. Our community management team’s responsibilities include supporting the sharing of experiences by consumers in the local markets that they serve and increasing brand awareness. We organize events several times a year to recognize our most important contributors, facilitating face-to-face interactions, building the Yelp brand and fostering the sense of true community in which we believe so strongly. We also engage with small businesses. For example, we established the Yelp Small Business Advisory Council as a way to interact with and get feedback from our core community of local business owners. We also work with the U.S. Congress, various state legislative bodiesSmall Business Administration and foreign governments concerning data protection that could affect us. For example,other partners to educate small business owners across the European Commission is currently consideringUnited States on best practices for online marketing.



Table of Contents

In addition, The Yelp Foundation, a data protection regulation imposing operational requirements on companies that receive personal data. The proposed requirements are different from those currentlynon-profit organization established by our board of directors in placeNovember 2011, or the Foundation, directly supports consumers and local businesses in the European Union,communities in which we operate. In 2011, our board of directors approved the contribution and issuance to the regulation may also include significant penalties for non-compliance.Foundation of 520,000 shares of our common stock, of which the Foundation had sold 160,000 shares as of December 31, 2016. The Foundation uses the proceeds from the sale of its shares of our common stock to make grants to local non-profit organizations that are actively engaged in supporting community and small business growth. As of December 31, 2016, the Foundation held 360,000 shares of common stock, representing less than 1% of our outstanding capital stock.

Information About Segment and Geographic Revenue

Information about segment and geographic revenue is set forth in Note 1518 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

11



Seasonality

Our business is affected both by cyclicality in business activity and by seasonal fluctuations in Internet usage and advertising spending. We believe our rapid growth has masked most of the cyclicality and seasonality of our business. As our revenue growth rate slows, we expect that the cyclicality and seasonality in our business may become more pronounced, and may in the future causecausing our operating results to fluctuate. In particular, based on historical trends, we expect traffic numbers to be weakest in the fourth quarter of the year in connection with end of the year holidays.

Corporate and Available Information

We were incorporated in Delaware on September 3, 2004 under the name Yelp, Inc., and we We changed our name to Yelp! Inc. in late September 2004 and to Yelp!Yelp Inc. and in February 2012 to Yelp Inc.2012. Our principal executive offices are located at 140 New Montgomery Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94105, and our telephone number is (415) 908-3801. Our website address is www.yelp.com. Information contained on or accessible throughlocated at www.yelp.com, and our investor relations website is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this Annual Report.located at www.yelp-ir.com.

We file or furnish electronically with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, our annual reportreports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. We make copies of these reports available free of charge on or through our investor relations website copies of these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to,them with the SEC.

    The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding our filings at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any of our All materials filedwe file with the SEC are available at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information regardingon the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

We webcast our earnings calls and certain events we participate in or host with members of the investment community on our investor relations website. Additionally, we provide notifications of news or announcements regarding our financial performance, including filings with the SEC, investor events, press and earnings releases, and blogs as part of our investor relations website. Investors and others can receive notifications of new information posted on our investor relations website in real time by signing up for e-mail alerts and RSS feeds.

Information contained on or accessible through our websites is not incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this Annual Report or any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of our Class A common stock. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before making an investment decision. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also significantly impair our business operations.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We have a limitedIf we are unable to increase traffic to our mobile app and website, or user engagement on our platform declines, our revenue, business and operating history in an evolving industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects andresults may increase the risk that we will not be successful.harmed.



Table of Contents

We have a limited operating history in an evolving industryderive substantially all of our revenue from the sale of impression- and click-based advertising. Because traffic to our platform determines the number of ads we are able to show, affects the value of those ads to businesses and influences the content creation that drives further traffic, slower traffic growth rates may not develop as expected, if at all. This limited operating history makes it difficult to assess our future prospects. You should considerharm our business and prospectsfinancial results. As a result, our ability to grow our business depends on our ability to increase traffic to and user engagement on our platform. Our traffic could be adversely affected by factors including:

Reliance on Internet Search Engines. As discussed in greater detail below, we rely on Internet search engines to drive traffic to our platform, including our mobile app. However, the display, including rankings, of unpaid search results can be affected by a number of factors, many of which are not in our direct control, and may change frequently. For example, a search engine may change its ranking algorithms, methodologies or design layouts. As a result, links to our platform may not be prominent enough to drive traffic to our platform, and we may not be in a position to influence the results. Although Internet search engine results have allowed us to attract a large audience with low organic traffic acquisition costs to date, if they fail to drive sufficient traffic to our platform in the future, we may need to increase our marketing expenses, which could harm our operating results.

Increasing Competition. The market for information regarding local businesses is intensely competitive and rapidly changing. If the popularity, usefulness, ease of use, performance and reliability of our products and services do not compare favorably to those of our competitors, traffic may decline.

Review Concentration. Our restaurant and shopping categories together accounted for approximately 40% of the businesses that had been reviewed on our platform and approximately 56% of the cumulative reviews as of December 31, 2016. If the high concentration of reviews in these categories generates a perception that our platform is primarily limited to these categories, traffic may not increase or may decline.

Our Recommendation Software. If our automated software does not recommend helpful content or recommends unhelpful content, consumers may reduce or stop their use of our platform. While we have designed our technology to avoid recommending content that we believe to be unreliable or otherwise unhelpful, we cannot guarantee that our efforts will be successful.

Content Scraping. From time to time, other companies copy information from our platform without our permission, through website scraping, robots or other means, and publish or aggregate it with other information for their own benefit. This may make them more competitive and may decrease the likelihood that consumers will visit our platform to find the local businesses and information they seek. Though we strive to detect and prevent this third-party conduct, we may not be able to detect it in a timely manner and, even if we could, may not be able to prevent it. In some cases, particularly in the case of third parties operating outside of the United States, our available remedies may be inadequate to protect us against such conduct.

Macroeconomic Conditions. Consumer purchases of discretionary items generally decline during recessions and other periods in which disposable income is adversely affected. As a result, adverse economic conditions may impact consumer spending, particularly with respect to local businesses, which in turn could adversely impact the number of consumers visiting our platform.

Internet Access. The adoption of any laws or regulations that adversely affect the growth, popularity or use of the Internet, including laws impacting Internet neutrality, could decrease the demand for our services. Similarly, any actions by companies that provide Internet access that degrade, disrupt or increase the cost of user access to our platform could undermine our operations and result in the loss of traffic.

We also anticipate that our traffic growth rate will continue to slow over time, and potentially decrease in lightcertain periods, as our business matures and we achieve higher penetration rates. In particular, we have already entered most major geographic markets within the United States and Canada, and we do not expect to pursue expansion in other international markets in the foreseeable future; further expansion in smaller markets may not yield similar results or sustain our growth. That our traffic growth has slowed in recent quarters even as we have expanded our operations is a reflection of this trend. As our traffic growth rate slows, our success will become increasingly dependent on our ability to increase levels of user engagement on our platform. This dependence may increase as the risksportion of our revenue derived from performance-based advertising increases. A number of factors may negatively affect our user engagement, including if:

users engage with other products, services or activities as an alternative to our platform;

there is a decrease in the perceived quality of the content contributed by our users;

we fail to introduce new and improved products or features, or we introduce new products or features that do not effectively address consumer needs or otherwise alienate consumers;



Table of Contents

technical or other problems negatively impact the availability and reliability of our platform or otherwise affect the user experience;

users have difficulty installing, updating or otherwise accessing our platform as a result of actions by us or third parties that we rely on to distribute our products;

users believe that their experience is diminished as a result of the decisions we make with respect to the frequency, relevance and prominence of the advertising we display; and

we do not maintain our brand image or our reputation is damaged.

Consumers are increasingly using mobile devices to access online services. If our mobile platform and difficultiesmobile advertising products are not compelling, or if we are unable to operate effectively on mobile devices, our business could be adversely affected.

The number of people who access information about local businesses through mobile devices, including smartphones, tablets and handheld computers, has increased dramatically over the past few years and is expected to continue to increase. Although many consumers access our platform both on their mobile devices and through personal computers, we have seen substantial growth in mobile usage. We anticipate that growth in use of our mobile platform will be the driver of our growth for the foreseeable future and that usage through personal computers may continue to decline. As a result, we must continue to drive adoption of and user engagement on our mobile platform, and our mobile app in particular. If we are unable to drive continued adoption of and engagement on our mobile app, our business may be harmed and we may be unable to decrease our reliance on traffic from Google and other search engines.

In order to attract and retain engaged users of our mobile platform, the mobile products and services we introduce must be compelling. However, the ways in which users engage with our platform and consume content has changed over time, and we expect it will continue to do so as users increasingly engage via mobile. This may make it more difficult to develop mobile products that consumers find useful or provide them with the information they seek, and may also negatively affect our content if users do not continue to contribute high quality content on their mobile devices. In addition, building an engaged base of mobile users may also be complicated by the frequency with which users change or upgrade their mobile services. In the event users choose mobile devices that do not already include or support our mobile app or do not install our mobile app when they change or upgrade their devices, our traffic and user engagement may be harmed.

Our success is also dependent on the interoperability of our mobile products with a range of mobile technologies, systems, networks and standards that we do not control, such as mobile operating systems like Android and iOS. We may not be successful in developing products that operate effectively with these technologies, systems, networks and standards or in creating, maintaining and developing relationships with key participants in the mobile industry, some of which may be our competitors. Any changes that degrade the functionality of our mobile products, give preferential treatment to competitive products or prevent us from delivering advertising could adversely affect mobile usage and monetization. As new mobile devices and platforms are released, it is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in thisdeveloping products for these alternative devices and platforms, and we may need to devote significant resources to the creation, support and maintenance of such products. If we experience difficulties in the future integrating our mobile app into mobile devices, or we face increased costs to distribute our mobile app, our user growth and operating results could be harmed.

In addition, the mobile market remains a rapidly evolving industry. These risksmarket with which we have limited experience. As new devices and difficulties includeplatforms are released, users may begin consuming content in a manner that is more difficult to monetize. Similarly, as mobile advertising products develop, demand may increase for products that we do not offer or that may alienate our ability to, among other things:

12



video ads. If the demand for information regarding local businesses doeswe are not develop as we expect, or if we fail to address the needs of this demand, our business will be harmed. We may not be able to addressbalance these competing considerations successfully, these risks and difficulties or others, including those described elsewhere in these risk factors. Failure to address these risks and difficulties adequately could harm our business and cause our operating results to suffer.

We have incurred significant operating losses in the past, and we may not be able to generate sufficientmeaningful revenue to achieve or maintain profitability, particularly givenfrom our significant ongoing sales and marketing expenses. Our recent growth rate will likely not be sustainable, and a failure to maintain an adequate growth rate will adversely affect our results of operations and business.

    Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses, and, as of December 31, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $70.5 million. Although our revenues have grown rapidly inmobile products despite the last several years, increasing from $12.1 million in 2008 to $233.0 million in 2013, we expect that our revenue growth rate will decline in the future as a result of a variety of factors, including the maturation of our business and the gradual decline in the number of major geographic markets, especially within the United States, to which we have not already expanded, and you should not rely on the revenue growth of any prior quarterly or annual period as an indication of our future performance. In addition, historically, our costs have increased each year and we expect our costs to increase in future periods as we continue to expend substantial financial resources on:

    These investments may not result in increased revenue orexpected growth in our business. Our costs may also increase as we hire additional employees, particularly as a resultmobile usage.



Table of the significant competition that we face to attract and retain technical talent. Our expenses may grow faster than our revenue and may be greater than we anticipate in a particular period or over time. If we are unable to maintain adequate revenue growth and to manage our expenses, we may continue to incur significant losses in the future and may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability.Contents

We rely on Internet search engines and application marketplaces to drive traffic to our website from search engines like Google, Bing and Yahoo!, someplatform, certain providers of which offer products and services that compete directly with our solutions.products. If information from and links to our applications and website are not displayed as prominently, on search engine result pages as those from competing products and services, traffic to our websiteplatform could decline and our business would be adversely affected.

13



Our success depends in part on our ability to attract users through unpaid Internet search results on search engines like Google Bing and Yahoo!.Bing. The number of users we attract from search engines to our website (including our mobile website) is due in large part to how and where information from and links to our website are displayed on search engine result pages. The display, including rankings, of unpaid search results can be affected by a number of factors, many of which are not in our direct control, and they may change frequently. For example, a search engine may change its ranking algorithms, methodologies or design layouts. As a result, links to our websiteplatform may not be prominent enough to drive traffic to our website,platform, and we may not know how or otherwise be in a position to influence the results. In some instances,

For example, Google has previously made changes to its algorithms and methodologies that may be contributing to the slowing of our traffic growth rate, particularly in our international markets where we have less content and more competitors. We believe this headwind on our ability to achieve prominent display of our content in international unpaid search engine companiesresults disrupted the network effect we expected in our international markets based on what we experienced domestically, whereby increases in content led to increases in traffic. This was a contributing factor to our decision to reallocate our international sales and marketing resources. Google also announced that, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, the rankings of sites showing certain types of app install interstitials could be penalized on its mobile search results pages. While we believe the type of interstitial we currently use will not be penalized, the parameters of Google’s policy may change their displays or rankingsfrom time to time, be poorly defined and be inconsistently interpreted. For example, in orderJanuary 2017, Google broadened the categories of interstitials that may be penalized. As a result, Google may unexpectedly penalize our app install interstitials, which may cause links to promote their own competing products or services orour mobile website to be featured less prominently in Google’s mobile search results page, and traffic to both our mobile website and mobile app may be harmed as a result. We cannot predict the products or serviceslong-term impact of one or more of our competitors. these changes.

Although traffic to our mobile app is less reliant on search results than traffic to our website, growth in mobile device usage may not decrease our overall reliance on search results if mobile users use our mobile website at the expense ofrather than our mobile app. In fact, growth inconsumers’ increasing use of mobile device usagedevices may exacerbate the risks associated with how and where our website is displayed in search results because mobile device screens are smaller than desktoppersonal computer screens and therefore display fewer search results. Our website has experienced fluctuations

We also rely on application marketplaces, such as Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play, to drive downloads of our applications. In the future, Apple, Google or other marketplace operators may make changes to their marketplaces that make access to our products more difficult. For example, our applications may receive unfavorable treatment compared to the promotion and placement of competing applications, such as the order in which they appear within marketplaces. Similarly, if problems arise in our relationships with providers of application marketplaces, our user growth could be harmed.

In some instances, search resultengine companies and application marketplaces may change their displays or rankings in order to promote their own competing products or services or the past, and we anticipate fluctuationsproducts or services of one or more of our competitors. For example, Google has integrated its local product offering, Google + Local, with certain of its products, including search. The resulting promotion of Google’s own competing products in its web search results has negatively impacted the future. Any reduction in the numbersearch ranking of users directed to our website could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

website. Because Google in particular is the most significant source of traffic to our website, accounting for more than half of the visits to our website from Internet searches during the three months and year ended December 31, 2013. Our2016, our success depends on our ability to maintain a prominent presence in search results for queries regarding local businesses on Google. Google has removed links to our website from portionsAs a result, Google’s promotion of its web search product and has promoted its own competing products, including Google’s local products,or similar actions by Google in the future that have the effect of reducing our prominence or ranking on its search results. Given the large volume of traffic to our website and the importance of the placement and display of results, of a user’s search, similar actions in the future could have a substantial negative effect on our business and results of operations.

If weour users fail to generate and maintain sufficientcontribute high quality content from ouror their contributions are not valuable to other users, we will be unable to provide consumers with the information they are looking for, which could negatively impact our traffic and revenue.revenue could be negatively affected.



Table of Contents

Our success in attracting users depends on our ability to provide consumers with the information they seek, which in turn depends on the quantity and quality of the content providedcontributed by our users. For example, we may be unable to provide consumers withWe believe that as the information they seek if our users do not contributedepth and breadth of the content that is helpful and reliable, or if they remove content they previously submitted. For example, our ability to provide high quality content may be harmed as consumers increasingly contribute content through our mobile website and mobile app because desktop contributions tend to be longer than content contributed through mobile devices. Similarly, we may be unable to provide consumers with the information they seek if our users are unwilling to contribute content because of concerns that they may be harassed or sued by the businesses they review, instances of which have occurred in the past and may occur again in the future. In addition, we may not be able to provide users the information they seek if the information on our platform is not up-to-date. We do not phase out or remove dated reviews, and consumers may view older reviews as less relevant, helpful or reliable. Ifgrow, our platform does not provide current information about local businesses or users perceive reviews onwill become more widely known and relevant to broader audiences, thereby attracting new consumers to our platform as less relevant, our brand and our business could be harmed.

    Ifservice. However, if we are unable to provide consumers with the information they seek, or if they can find equivalent content on other services, they may stop or reduce their use of our platform, and traffic to our website and on our mobile app will decline. If our user traffic declines, our advertisers may stop or reduce the amount of advertising on our platform and our business could be harmed.

Our businessability to provide consumers with valuable content may be harmedharmed:

if our users do not contribute content that is helpful or reliable;

if our users remove content they previously submitted;

as a result of user concerns that they may be harassed or sued by the businesses they review, instances of which have occurred in the past and may occur again in the future; and

as users increasingly contribute content through our mobile platform, because content contributed through mobile devices tends to be shorter than desktop contributions.

Similarly, if users viewrobots, shills or other spam accounts are able to contribute a significant amount of recommended content, or consumers perceive a significant amount of our platform as primarily limitedrecommended content to reviews of restaurantsbe from such accounts, our traffic and shopping experiences.

    Our user trafficrevenue could be adversely affectednegatively affected. Although we do not believe content from these sources has had a material impact to date, if consumers perceive the utility of our platform to be limited to finding businesses in the restaurant and shopping categories, which together accounted for approximately 43% of the businesses that have been reviewed on our platform and approximately 59% of our cumulative reviews through December 31, 2013. We believe that this concentration of reviews is primarily due to the frequency with which individuals visit specific businesses or engage in certain activities versus others. For example, an individual may eat at a restaurant three times in one week or go shopping once a week, but the same individual is unlikely to visit a mechanic, get a haircut or use a home or local service with the same frequency. However, if the high concentration of reviews in the restaurant and shopping categories generates a perception that our platform is primarily limited to these categories, traffic may decline and advertising customers may be less likely to perceive value from using our services, which could harm our business.

14



If our automated software does not recommend helpfulrecommends a substantial amount of such content or recommends unhelpful content, consumers and businesses alike may stop or reduce their use of our platform and products, and our business could suffer.

    While we have designed our technology to avoid recommending content that we believe may be offensive, biased, unreliable or otherwise unhelpful, we cannot guarantee that our efforts will be effective or adequate. In addition, some consumers and businesses have alternately expressed concern that our technology either recommends too many reviews, thereby recommending some reviews that may not be legitimate, or too few reviews, thereby not recommending some reviews that may be legitimate. This may cause consumers and businesses to stop or reduce their use of our platform or our advertising solutions. Ifin the performance of our automated recommendation software proves inadequate or ineffective, our reputation and brand may be harmed, users may stop using our products and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business depends on a strong brand, and any failure to maintain, protect and enhance our brand would hurtfuture, our ability to retainprovide high quality content would be harmed and expand our base of users and advertisers, as well as our ability to increase the frequency with which they use our solutions.

    We have developed a strong brand that we believe has contributed significantly to the success of our business. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing the “Yelp” brand is critical to expanding our base of users and advertisers and increasing the frequency with which they use our solutions. Our ability to do so will depend largely on our ability to maintain consumer trust inessential to our solutions and in the quality and integrity of the user content and othersuccess could be undermined.

In addition, if our platform does not provide current information found on our website and mobile app, which we may not do successfully. If weabout local businesses or users do not successfully maintain a strong brand, our business could be harmed.

    For example, if consumers do not perceive the user content on our platform to be authentic, they may lose trust in the integrity of the content and our brand may be harmed. This may occur if consumers believe that the reviews, photos and other content contributed by our Community Managers or other employees are influenced by our advertising relationships or are otherwise biased. Although we take steps to prevent this from occurring by, for example, displaying an “ambassador” badge on the account profile pages for each of our Community Managers identifying them as Yelp employees and explaining their role on our platform, the designation does not appear on the page for each review contributed by the Community Manager and we may not be successful in our efforts to maintain consumer trust. Similarly, certain media outlets have previously reported allegations that a significant percentage of the reviews on our platform are not genuine. Although we take steps to address the reviews that may not be reliable through our automated recommendation software, our consumer alerts program, coordination with law enforcement and sting operations targeting the buying and selling of reviews, we cannot ensure that each of the 36.4 million recommended reviews on our platform as of December 31, 2013 are authentic. If consumersrelevant, our brand and business could be harmed. For example, we do not believe our recommendedphase out or remove dated reviews, to beand consumers may view older reviews as less relevant, helpful or reliable they may seek other services to obtain the information for which they are looking, and may not return to our platform as often in the future, or at all. This would negatively impact our ability to retain and attract users and advertisers and increase the frequency with which they use our platform.

    Maintaining and enhancing our brand may require us to make substantial investments, and these investments may not be successful. For example, our trademarks are an important element of our brand. We have faced in the past, and may face in the future, oppositions from third parties to our applications to register key trademarks in foreign jurisdictions in which we expect to expand our presence. If we are unsuccessful in defending against these oppositions, our trademark applications may be denied. Whether or not our trademark registration applications are denied, third parties may claim that our trademarks infringe their rights. As a result, we could be forced to pay significant settlement costs or cease the use of these trademarks and associated elements of our brand in those or other jurisdictions. Doing so could harm our brand or brand recognition and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to maintain and enhance our brand successfully, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business and financial results may be adversely affected.

15



Negative publicity could adversely affect our reputation and brand.

    Negative publicity about our company, including our technology, sales practices, personnel, customer service or litigation or political activities, could diminish confidence in and the use of our products. Certain media outlets have previously reported allegations that we manipulate our reviews, rankings and ratings in favor of our advertisers and against non-advertisers. These allegations, though untrue, could adversely affect our reputation and brand, require significant management time and attention, and subject us to inquiries or investigations. In order to demonstrate that our automated recommendation software applies in a nondiscriminatory manner to both advertisers and nonadvertisers, we have made all reviews that are not recommended accessible on our platform. We have also allowed businesses to comment publicly on negative reviews so that they can provide their response. Nevertheless, our reputation and brand, the traffic to our website and mobile app and our business may suffer if negative publicity about our company persists or if users otherwise perceive that content on our website and mobile app is manipulated or biased. In addition, our website and mobile app also serve as a platform for expression by our users, and third parties or the public at large may attribute the political or other sentiments expressed by users on our platform to us, which could harm our reputation. Similarly, the actions of our partners may affect our brand if users do not have a positive experience completing transactions on the Yelp Platform.than more recent reviews.

If we fail to maintain and expand our base of advertisers, our revenue and our business will be harmed.

    For the three months and full year ended December 31, 2013, substantially all of our revenue was generated by the sale of advertising products. We have incurred significant costs to attract current and future advertisers and expect to incur significant additional costs for the foreseeable future. Our ability to grow our business depends on our ability to maintain and expand our advertiser base. To do so, we must convince existing and prospective advertisers alike that our advertising products offer a material benefit and can generate a competitive return relative to other alternatives. Many prospectiveOur ability to do so depends on factors including:

Acceptance of Online Advertising. We believe that the continued growth and acceptance of our online advertising products will depend on the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of online advertising models generally, which is outside of our control. For example, if ad-blocking programs that affect the delivery of online advertising gain further visibility or traction, the perceived value of online advertising, and that of our advertising products in turn, may be harmed. Many advertisers still have limited experience with online advertising and, as a result, may continue to devote significant portions of their advertising budgets to traditional, offline advertising media, such as newspapers or print yellow pages directories.

Competitiveness of Our Products. We must deliver ads in an effective manner. We may be unable to attract new advertisers if our products are not compelling or we fail to innovate and introduce enhanced products meeting advertiser expectations. For example, in their current form, our ad products may be most attractive to businesses with higher than average ratings and numbers of reviews. As a result, businesses with lower ratings and fewer reviews may not purchase our ad products, or may abandon them if they do not believe our ad products are effective. At the same time, we must balance advertiser demands against our commitment to providing a good user experience. For example, we phased out our brand advertising products in part because demand in the brand advertising market has shifted toward products disruptive to the consumer experience. In addition, we must provide accurate analytics and measurement solutions that demonstrate the value of our advertising products compared to those of our competitors. Similarly, if the pricing of our advertising products does not compare favorably to those of our competitors, advertisers may reduce their advertising with us or choose not to advertise with us at all. The widespread adoption of any technologies that make it more difficult for us to deliver ads, such as ad-blocking programs, could also decrease our value proposition to businesses and reduce demand for our products.

Traffic Quality. The success of our advertising program depends on delivering positive results to our advertising customers. Low-quality or invalid traffic, such as robots, spiders and the mechanical automation of clicking, may be detrimental to our relationships with advertisers and could adversely affect our advertising pricing and revenue. If we fail to detect and prevent click fraud or other invalid clicks on ads, the affected advertisers may experience or perceive a reduced return on their investments, which could lead to dissatisfaction with our products, refusals to pay, refund demands or withdrawal of future business.



Table of Contents

Perception of Our Platform. Our ability to compete effectively for advertiser budgets depends on our reputation and perceptions regarding our platform. For example, we may face challenges expanding our advertiser base in businesses outside the restaurant and shopping categories if businesses believe that consumers perceive the utility of our platform to be limited to finding businesses in these categories. The ratings and reviews that businesses receive from our users may also affect their advertising decisions. Favorable ratings and reviews, on the one hand, could be perceived as obviating the need to advertise. Unfavorable ratings and reviews, on the other, could discourage businesses from advertising to an audience that they perceive as hostile or cause them to form a negative opinion of our products and user base.

Macroeconomic Conditions. Adverse macroeconomic conditions can have a negative impact on the demand for advertising, particularly with respect to online advertising products. We rely heavily on small and medium-sized businesses, which often have limited advertising budgets and may be disproportionately affected by economic downturns. In addition, such business may view online advertising as lower priority than offline advertising.

As is typical in our industry, our advertisers such as those in new markets, may not be familiar with our products or view them as unproven. Many of these businesses are more accustomed to using more traditional methods of advertising, such as newspapers or print yellow pages directories. If we do not deliver ads in an effective manner, or we do not provide accurate analytics and measurement solutions that demonstrate the value of our ads, advertisers may choose not to advertise with us.

    Our advertisers typicallygenerally do not have long-term obligations to purchase our products, and theirproducts. Their decisions to renew depend on a number of factors, including the degree of satisfaction with our products andas well as a number of factors that are outside of our control, including their ability to continue their operations and spending levels. We rely heavily on advertising spend by smallSmall and medium-sized local businesses whichin particular have historically experienced high failure rates and often have limited advertising budgets.rates. As a result, we may experience attrition in our advertisers in the ordinary course of business resulting from several factors, including losses to competitors, declining advertising budgets, closures and bankruptcies.

    We The negative impact of attrition on our financial results may facebe greater challengeswith respect to advertisers who are billed in arrears, as we continuethe vast majority of our advertisers now are, if they fail to expand our advertiser base in businesses outside the restaurant and shopping categories, which together accounted for approximately 43% of the businessesmake payment on ads that have already been reviewed ondelivered. In addition, our platform and approximately 59%recent phase out of our cumulative reviews through December 31, 2013, especially if these businesses believe that consumers perceive the utilitybrand advertising products, which had been an additional source of revenue for us, may make us more susceptible to fluctuations and attrition from small and medium-sized businesses. To grow our platform to be limited to finding businesses in the restaurant and shopping categories. The ratings and reviews that businesses receive from our users may also affect advertising decisions by current and prospective advertisers. For instance, favorable ratings and reviews, on the one hand, could be perceived as obviating the need to advertise, and unfavorable ratings and reviews, on the other, could discourage businesses from advertising to an audience they perceive as hostile or cause them to form a negative opinion of our products and user base, which could discourage them from doing business, with us.

    Wewe must continually add new advertisers both to replace advertisers who choose not to renew their advertising, or who go out of business or otherwise fail to fulfill their advertising contracts with us, which we may not be able to grow our business. If our advertisers increase their rates of non-renewal or if we experience significant advertiser attrition or contract breach, or if we are unable to attract new advertisers in numbers greater than the number of advertisers that we lose, our client base will decrease and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be harmed.do.

16



If we fail to expandfurther develop our domestic markets effectively, into new markets, both domestically and abroad, our revenue and our business will be harmed.

       We intendIn the fourth quarter of 2016, we wound down our international sales and marketing operations and reallocated the associated resources primarily to expand our operations into new markets, both domesticallyU.S. and abroad. We may incur losses or otherwise failCanadian markets. As a result, our continued growth depends on our ability to enter new markets successfully. Our expansion into new markets places usfurther develop our U.S. and Canadian communities and operations. However, our communities in competitive environments with which we are unfamiliar and involves various risks, including the need to invest significant resources and the possibility that returns on such investments will not be achieved for several years, or at all. In attempting to establish a presence in new markets, we expect, as we have in the past, to incur significant expenses and face various other challenges, such as expanding our sales force and community management personnel to reach those new markets and encountering different and potentially lower levels of user engagement in some or all of these markets. Our current and any future expansion plans will require significant resources and management attention. Furthermore, we have already entered many of the largest markets in the United States and Canada are in a relatively late stage of development, and further expansion indevelopment of smaller markets may not yield similar results or sustain our growth.

We plan to continue expanding our operations abroad where we have limited operating experience and may be subject to increased risks that could affect our financial results.

       We plan to continue the international expansion of our operations and our offerings in new languages. Our platform is now available in English and several other languages. However, we may have difficulty modifying our technology and content for use in non-English-speaking markets or fostering new communities in non-English-speaking markets. Our ability to manage our business and conduct our operations internationally requires considerable management attention and resources, and is subject to the particular challenges of supporting a rapidly growing business in an environment of multiple languages, cultures, customs, legal systems, alternative dispute systems, regulatory systems and commercial infrastructures. Furthermore, in most international markets, we would not be the first entrant, and our competitors may be better positioned than If we are to succeed. Expanding internationally may subject us to risks that we have either not faced before or increase our exposure to risks that we currently face, including risks associated with:

17



Mobile advertising is new and evolving. If our mobile advertising solutions are not compelling or do not operate effectively with mobile operating systems, growth in use of our mobile app and mobile website, particularly if it substitutes for use of our website on personal computers, may adversely affect our results of operations and business.

       The number of people who access information about local businesses through mobile devices, including smartphones and handheld tablets or computers, has increased dramatically in the past few years and is expected to continue to increase. Although we currently deliver advertising on our mobile app and mobile website, the mobile advertising market remains a new and evolving market. Given our limited experience in monetizing our mobile products and commitment to prioritizing the quality of user experience over short-term monetization, we may not be able to generate meaningful revenue from our mobile products despite the expected growth in mobile usage. In addition, if consumers use our mobile app and mobile websitedevelop these markets as substitutes for, rather than in addition to, use of our website on personal computers and our mobile solutions prove ineffective, our advertisers may stopwe expect, or reduce their advertising with us. Similarly, we may be unable to attract new advertisers if our mobile advertising solutions are not compelling. If our advertising solutions are not effective or we fail to continue to innovate and introduce enhanced mobile solutions, if our solutions alienate our user base, or if our solutions are not widely adopted or are insufficiently profitable, our business may suffer.

       Additionally, we are dependent on the interoperability of our mobile products with popular mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as Android and iOS, and any changes in such systems that degrade their functionality could adversely affect mobile usage. As new mobile devices and platforms are released, it is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in developing products for these alternative devices and platforms, and we may need to devote significant resources to the creation, support and maintenance of such products. If we experience difficulties in the future in integrating our mobile app into mobile devices or if problems arise with our relationships with providers of mobile operating systems or mobile application download stores, such as those of Google, with whose local products we compete, or Apple, our user growth and user engagement could be harmed. In addition, if our applications receive unfavorable treatment compared to the promotion and placement of competing applications, such as the order of our products in the Apple AppStore, or if we face increased costs to distribute our mobile app, our future growth and our results of operations could suffer. Further, in the event that it becomes more difficult for our users to access and use our mobile app, or if users choose to use mobile products that do not offer access to our mobile app, we may be unable to decrease our reliance on traffic from Google and other search engines.

We expect to face increased competition in the market.

       The market for information regarding local businesses and advertising is intensely competitive and rapidly changing. With the emergence of new technologies and market entrants, competition is likely to intensify in the future. Our competitors include, among others, offline media companies and service providers; newspaper, television and other media companies; Internet search engines, such as Google, Bing and Yahoo!; and various other online service providers and review websites, including regional review websites that may have strong positions in particular countries.

       Our competitors may enjoy competitive advantages, such as greater name recognition, longer operating histories, substantially greater market share, large existing user bases and substantially greater financial, technical and other resources. These companies may use these advantages to offer products similar to ours at a lower price, develop different products to compete with our current solutions and respond more quickly and effectively than we do to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or client requirements. In particular, major Internet companies, such as Google, Facebook, Yahoo! and Microsoft may be more successful than us in developing and marketing online advertising offerings directly to local businesses and many of our advertisers and potential advertisers may choose to purchase online advertising services from these competitors and may reduce their purchases of our products. In addition, many of our current and potential competitors have established marketing relationships with and access to larger client bases. Certain competitors could also use strong or dominant positions in one or more markets to gain competitive advantage against us in areas where we operate, including by: integrating review platforms or features into products they control, such as search engines, web browsers or mobile device operating systems; changing their unpaid search result rankings to promote their products; refusing to enter into or renew licenses on which we depend; or limiting or denying our access to advertising measurement or delivery systems.

18



       As the market for local online advertising increases, new competitors, business models and solutions are likely to emerge. We also compete with these companies for the attention of contributors and consumers, and may experience decreases in both if our competitors offer more compelling environments. For all of these reasons, we may be unable to maintain or grow the number of people who use our website and mobile app and the number of businesses that use our advertising solutions and we may face pressure to reduce the price of our advertising solutions, in which case our business, results of operations and financial condition will be harmed.

The traffic to our website and mobile application may decline and our business may suffer if other companies copy information from our platform and publish or aggregate it with other information for their own benefit.

       From time to time, other companies copy information from our platform, through website scraping, robots or other means, and publish or aggregate it with other information for their own benefit. For example, in parts of 2010 and 2011, Google incorporated content from our website into its own local product without our permission. Google’s users, as a result, may not have visited our website because they found the information they sought on Google. While we do not believe that Google is still incorporating our content within its local products, we have no assurance that Google or other companies will not copy, publish or aggregate content from our platform in the future.

       When third parties copy, publish or aggregate content from our platform, it makes them more competitive and decreases the likelihood that consumers will visit our website or use our mobile app to find the information they seek, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We may not be able to detect such third-party conduct in a timely manner and, even if we could, we may not be able to prevent it. In some cases, particularly in the case of websites operating outside of the United States, our available remedies may be inadequate to protect us against such practices. In addition, we may be required to expend significant financial or other resources to successfully enforce our rights.

The impact of worldwide economic conditions, including the resulting effect on advertising spending by local businesses, may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

       Worldwide economic conditions, such as the sovereign debt and federal government funding issues in the United States, create uncertainty and unpredictability and add risk to our future outlook. Our performance is subject to, among other things, the impact of worldwide economic conditions on levels of advertising spend by small and medium-sized businesses, which may be disproportionately affected by economic downturns. In the event of an economic slowdown or deterioration of worldwide economic conditions, our existing and potential advertising clients may no longer consider investment in our advertising solutions a necessity, or may elect to reduce advertising budgets. Historically, economic downturns have resulted in overall reductions in advertising spending. In particular, web-based advertising solutions may be viewed by some of our existing and potential advertising clients as a lower priority and could cause advertisers to reduce the amounts they spend on advertising, terminate their use of our solutions or default on their payment obligations to us. In addition, economic conditions may adversely impact levels of consumer spending, which could adversely impact the numbers of consumers visiting our website and mobile app. Consumer purchases of discretionary items generally decline during recessionary periods and other periods in which disposable income is adversely affected. If spending at many of the local businesses reviewed on our platform declines, businesses may be less likely to use our advertising products, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We face potential liability and expense for legal claims based on the content on our platform.

       We face potential liability and expense for legal claims relating to the information that we publish on our website and mobile app, including claims for defamation, libel, negligence and copyright or trademark infringement, among others. For example, businesses in the past have claimed, and may in the future claim, that we are responsible for defamatory reviews posted by our users. We expect claims like these to continue, and potentially increase in proportion to the amount of content on our platform. These claims could divert management time and attention away from our business and result in significant costs to investigate and defend, regardless of the merits of the claims. In some instances, we may elect or be compelled to remove content or may be forced to pay substantial damages if we are unsuccessful in our efforts to defend against these claims. If we elect or are compelled to remove valuable content from our website or mobile app, our platform may become less useful to consumers and our traffic may decline, which could have a negative impact on our business and financial performance.

19



       This risk may be increased if the immunities afforded to websites that publish user-generated content are limited through new legislation or otherwise. For example, laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties are currently being tested by a number of claims, including actions based on invasion of privacy and other torts, unfair competition, copyright and trademark infringement and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the ads posted or the content provided by users. It may also be enhanced in certain jurisdictions outside the United States where our protection from liability for third-party actions may be unclear and where we may be less protected under local laws than we are in the United States.

Our business is subject to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign regulations and other legal obligations related to privacy, data protection and other matters. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such regulations and obligations could harm our business.

       We are subject to a variety of laws in the United States and abroad that involve matters central to our business, including laws regarding privacy, data retention, distribution of user-generated content and consumer protection, among others. For example, because we receive, store and process personal information and other user data, including credit card information for certain users, we are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws around the world regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, processing, disclosure and protection of personal information and other user data, such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, which regulates the way we collect and use information from children. We are also subject to a variety of laws, regulations and guidelines that regulate the way we distinguish paid search results and other types of advertising from unpaid search results.

       The application and interpretation of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate, and may be inconsistent between countries. It is also possible that the interpretation and application of these obligations may conflict with other rules or our practices, such as industry standards to which we adhere, our privacy policies and our privacy-related obligations to third parties (including, in certain instances, voluntary third-party certification bodies such as TRUSTe). It is difficult to predict how existing laws will be applied to our business, and if our business grows and evolves and our solutions are used in a greater number of countries, we will also become subject to laws and regulations in additional jurisdictions.

       Similarly, our business could be adversely affected if new legislation or regulations are adopted that are inconsistent with our current business practices and that require us to change these practices or the design of our platform, products or features. For example, regulatory frameworks for privacy issues are currently in flux worldwide, and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable future due to increased public scrutiny of the practices of companies offering online services with respect to the personal information of their users. The U.S. government, including the White House, the Federal Trade Commissions, or FTC, and the Department of Commerce, and many state governments are reviewing the need for greater regulation of the collection of information concerning consumer behavior with respect to online services, including regulation aimed at restricting certain targeted advertising practices and the collection and use of data from mobile services. In addition, the European Union is in the process of promulgating a new general data protection regulation, which may result in significantly greater compliance burdens for companies such as us with users and operations in Europe. Changes like these could increase our administrative costs and make it more difficult for consumers to use our platform, resulting in less traffic and revenue. Similarly, such changes could make it more difficult for us to provide effective advertising tools to businesses on our platform, resulting in fewer advertisers and less revenue.

       We believe our policies and practices comply with applicable laws and regulations. However, if our belief proves incorrect, if these guidelines, laws or regulations or their interpretation change or new legislation or regulations are enacted, or if the third parties with whom we share user information fail to comply with such guidelines, laws, regulations or their contractual obligations to us, we may be forced to implement new measures to reduce our legal exposure. This may require us to expend substantial resources, delay development of new products or discontinue certain products or features, which would negatively affect our business. For example, if we fail to comply with our privacy-related obligations to users or third parties, or any compromiseaddress the needs of security that results in the unauthorized release or transfer of personally identifiable information or other user data, we may be compelled to provide additional disclosures to our users, obtain additional consents from our users before collecting or using their information or implement new safeguards to help our users manage our use of their information, among other changes. We may also face governmental enforcement actions, litigation or negative publicity, which could cause our users and advertisers to lose trust in us and have an adverse effect on our business. The FTC in particular has approved consent decrees resolving complaints and their resulting investigations into the privacy and security practices of a number of social media companies. Similar investigations, decrees or actions may adversely impact us directly.

20



Our growth depends in part on the success of our strategic relationships with third parties, and any failure to maintain these relationships could harm our business.

       We rely in part on relationships with various third parties to growthose markets, our business including strategic partners and technology and content providers. Identifying, negotiating and maintaining relationships with third parties require significant time and resources, as does integrating their services and technologies onto our platform. We may also have competing interests and obligations with respect to our partners, which may make it difficult to maintain, grow or maximize the benefit of each partnership. In addition, we have had, and may in the future have, disagreements or disputes with our partners about our respective contractual obligations, which could result in legal proceedings or negatively affect our brand and reputation. It is also possible that these third parties may notwill be able to devote the resources we expect to the relationships or they may terminate their relationships with us. If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining our relationships with third parties, our ability to grow our business could be impaired, and our operating results could suffer.harmed.

We may acquire other companies or technologies, which could divert our management’s attention, result in additional dilution to our stockholders and otherwise disrupt our operations and harm our operating results. We may also be unable to realize the expected benefits and synergies of any acquisitions.

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to expand our product offerings and grow our business in response to changing technologies, user and advertiser demands and competitive pressures. In some circumstances, we may determine to do so through the acquisition of complementary businesses or technologies rather than through internal development. For example, in October 2012,February 2015, we acquired Qype to accelerate our international expansion and, in July 2013, we acquired SeatMeEat24 to obtain an online reservationfood ordering solution. We have limited experience as a company in the complex process of acquiring other businesses and technologies. The pursuit of potential future acquisitions may divert the attention of management and cause us to incur expenses in identifying, investigating and pursuing suitable acquisitions, whether or not they are consummated.

Acquisitions that are consummated could result in dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, which could adversely affect our results of operations or our ability to achieve profitability.operations. The incurrence of debt in particular could result in increased fixed obligations or include covenants or other restrictions that would impede our ability to manage our operations. In addition, any acquisitions we announce could be viewed negatively by users, businesses or investors. We may also discover liabilities or deficiencies associated with the companies or assets we acquire that we did not identify in advance, which may result in significant unanticipated costs. For example, in 2015, two lawsuits were filed against us by former Eat24 employees alleging that Eat24 failed to comply with certain labor laws prior to the acquisition. The effectiveness of our due diligence review and our ability to evaluate the results of such due diligence are dependent upon the accuracy and completeness of statements and disclosures made by the companies we acquire or their representatives, as well as the limited amount of time in which acquisitions are executed. We may also fail to accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition transaction, including tax and accounting charges.



Table of Contents

       In order to realize any gains from any acquisition, we must successfully complete the integration of the acquired business, its operations, services and personnel with our organization. In order to realize the expected benefits and synergies of our acquisitions,any acquisition that is consummated, we must meet a number of significant challenges including:

21



expenditures, including:

integrating operations, strategies, services, sites and technologies of the acquired company;

managing the combined business effectively;

retaining and assimilating the employees of the acquired company;

retaining existing customers and strategic partners and minimizing disruption to existing relationships as a result of any integration of new personnel;

difficulties in the assimilation of corporate cultures;

implementing and retaining uniform standards, controls, procedures, policies and information systems; and

addressing risks related to the business of the acquired company that may continue to impact the business following the acquisition.

Any inability to integrate services, sites and technologies, operations or personnel in an efficient and timely manner could harm our results of operations. Transition activities are complex and require significant time and resources, and we may not manage the process successfully.successfully, particularly if we are managing multiple integrations concurrently. Our ability to integrate complex acquisitions is unproven, particularly with respect to companies that have significant operations or that develop products with which we do not have prior experience. For example, Eat24 was larger and more complex than companies we had previously acquired. In addition, Eat24 operates a business that is new to us, and we did not have significant experience or structure in place to support this business prior to the acquisition. We plan to invest resources to support this and any future acquisitions, which will result in ongoing operating expenses and may divert resources and management attention from other areas of our business. We cannot assure you that these investments will be required to spend additional time or funds on integration that otherwise would be spent on the development and expansion of the combined business.successful. Even if we are able to integrate the operations of any acquired company successfully, these integrations may not result in the realization of the full benefits of synergies, cost savings, innovation and operational efficiencies that may be possible from the integrationcombination of each business, and these benefitsthe businesses, or we may not be achievedachieve these benefits within a reasonable period of time.

We rely on third-party service providers and strategic partners for many aspects of our business, and any failure to maintain these relationships could harm our business.

We rely on relationships with various third parties to grow our business, including strategic partners and technology and content providers. For example, we rely on third parties for data about local businesses, mapping functionality, payment processing and administrative software solutions. We also rely on partners for various transactions available through the Yelp Platform, including Booker for spa and salon appointments, Locu for menu data and BloomNation for flower deliveries, among others. Identifying, negotiating and maintaining relationships with third parties require significant time and resources, as does integrating their data, services and technologies onto our platform. It is possible that these third parties may not be able to devote the resources we expect to the relationships. We may also have competing interests and obligations with respect to our partners in particular, which may make it difficult to maintain, grow or maximize the benefit for each partnership. For example, our entry into the online reservations space with our acquisition of SeatMe, Inc. in 2013 put us in competition with OpenTable, which led to the end of our partnership in 2015. Our focus on integrating additional partners to expand the Yelp Platform may exacerbate this risk.

If our relationships with our partners and providers deteriorate, we could suffer increased costs and delays in our ability to provide consumers and advertisers with content or similar services. We have had, and may in the future have, disagreements or disputes with our partners about our respective contractual obligations, which could result in legal proceedings or negatively affect our brand and reputation. In addition, we exercise limited control over our third-party partners and vendors, which makes us vulnerable to any errors, interruptions or delays in their operations. If these third parties experience any service disruptions, financial distress or other business disruption, or difficulties meeting our requirements or standards, it could make it difficult for us to operate some aspects of our business. For example, we rely on a single supplier to process payments of all transactions made on the Yelp Platform and for purchases of Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates. Any disruption or problems with this supplier or its services could have an adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations and financial results. Similarly, upon expiration or termination of any of our agreements with third-party providers, we may not be able to replace the services provided to us in a timely manner or on terms that are favorable to us, if at all, and a transition from one partner or provider to another could subject us to operational delays and inefficiencies.



Table of Contents

We face competition for both local business directory traffic and advertiser spending, and expect competition to increase in the future.

The market for information regarding local businesses and advertising is intensely competitive and rapidly changing. With the emergence of new technologies and market entrants, competition is likely to intensify in the future. We compete for consumer traffic with traditional, offline local business guides and directories, Internet search engines, such as Google and Bing, review and social media websites and various other online service providers. These competitors may include regional review websites that may have strong positions in particular countries. We also compete with these companies for the content of contributors, and may experience decreases in both traffic and user engagement if our competitors offer more compelling environments.

Although advertisers are allocating an increasing amount of their overall marketing budgets to online advertising, such spending lags behind growth in Internet and mobile usage generally, making the market for online advertising intensely competitive. We compete for a share of local businesses’ overall advertising budgets with traditional, offline media companies and service providers, as well as Internet marketing providers. Many of these companies have established marketing relationships with local businesses, and certain of our online competitors have substantial proprietary advertising inventory and web traffic that may provide a significant competitive advantage.

Certain competitors could use strong or dominant positions in one or more markets to gain competitive advantage against us in areas in which we operate, including by: integrating review platforms or features into products they control, such as search engines, web browsers or mobile device operating systems; making acquisitions; changing their unpaid search result rankings to promote their own products; refusing to enter into or renew licenses on which we depend; limiting or denying our access to advertising measurement or delivery systems; limiting our ability to target or measure the effectiveness of ads; or making access to our platform more difficult. This risk may be exacerbated by the trend in recent years toward consolidation among online media companies, potentially allowing our larger competitors to offer bundled or integrated products that feature alternatives to our platform.

Our competitors may also enjoy competitive advantages, such as greater name recognition, longer operating histories, substantially greater market share, large existing user bases and substantially greater financial, technical and other resources. Traditional television and print media companies, for example, have large established audiences and more traditional and widely accepted advertising products. These companies may use these advantages to offer products similar to ours at a lower price, develop different products to compete with our current solutions and respond more quickly and effectively than we do to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or client requirements. In particular, major Internet companies, such as Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft, may be more successful than us in developing and marketing online advertising offerings directly to local businesses, and may leverage their relationships based on other products or services to gain additional share of advertising budgets.

To compete effectively, we must continue to invest significant resources in product development to enhance user experience and engagement, as well as sales and marketing to expand our base of advertisers. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully for users and advertisers against existing or new competitors, and failure to do so could result in loss of existing users, reduced revenue, increased marketing expenses or diminished brand strength, any of which could harm our business.

Our business depends on a strong brand, and any failure to maintain, protect and enhance our brand would hurt our ability to retain and expand our base of users and advertisers, as well as our ability to increase the frequency with which they use our products.

We have developed a strong brand that we believe has contributed significantly to the success of our business. Maintaining, protecting and enhancing the “Yelp” brand are critical to expanding our base of users and advertisers and increasing the frequency with which they use our solutions. Our ability to do so will depend largely on our ability to maintain consumer trust in our products and in the quality and integrity of the user content and other information found on our platform, which we may not do successfully. We dedicate significant resources to these goals, primarily through our automated recommendation software, sting operations targeting the buying and selling of reviews, our consumer alerts program, coordination with consumer protection agencies and law enforcement, and, in certain egregious cases, taking legal action against business we believe to be engaged in deceptive activities. We also endeavor to remove content from our platform that violates our terms of service.



Table of Contents

Despite these efforts, we cannot guarantee that each of the 85.7 million reviews on our platform that had been recommended and that had not been removed as of December 31, 2016 is useful or reliable, or that consumers will trust the integrity of our content. For example, if our recommendation software does not recommend helpful content or recommends unhelpful content, consumers and businesses alike may stop or reduce their use of our platform and products. Some consumers and businesses have alternately expressed concern that our technology either recommends too many reviews, thereby recommending some reviews that may not be legitimate, or too few reviews, thereby not recommending some reviews that may be legitimate. If consumers do not believe our recommended reviews to be useful and reliable, they may seek other services to obtain the information for which they are looking, and may not return to our platform as often in the future, or at all. This would negatively impact our ability to retain and attract users and advertisers and the frequency with which they use our platform.

Consumers may also believe that the reviews, photos and other user content contributed by our Community Managers or other employees are influenced by our advertising relationships or are otherwise biased. Although we take steps to prevent this from occurring by, for example, identifying Community Managers as Yelp employees on their account profile pages and explaining their role on our platform, the designation does not appear on the page for each review contributed by the Community Manager and we may not be successful in our efforts to maintain consumer trust. Similarly, the actions of our partners may affect our brand if users do not have a positive experience on the Yelp Platform. If others misuse our brand or pass themselves off as being endorsed or affiliated with us, it could harm our reputation and our business could suffer. For example, we have encountered instances of reputation management companies falsely representing themselves as being affiliated with us when soliciting customers; this practice could be contributing to rumors that business owners can pay to manipulate reviews, rankings and ratings. Our website and mobile app also serve as a platform for expression by our users, and third parties or the public at large may also attribute the political or other sentiments expressed by users on our platform to us, which could harm our reputation.

In addition, negative publicity about our company, including our technology, sales practices, personnel, customer service, litigation, strategic plans or political activities could diminish confidence in our brand and the use of our products. Certain media outlets have previously reported allegations that we manipulate our reviews, rankings and ratings in favor of our advertisers and against non-advertisers. In order to demonstrate that our automated recommendation software applies in a nondiscriminatory manner to both advertisers and non-advertisers, we allow users to access reviews that are both recommended and not recommended by our software. We have also allowed businesses to comment publicly on reviews so that they can provide a response. Nevertheless, our reputation and brand, the traffic to our website and mobile app and our business may suffer if negative publicity about our company persists or if users otherwise perceive that our content is manipulated or biased. Allegations and complaints regarding our business practices, and any resulting negative publicity, may also result in increased regulatory scrutiny of our company. In addition to requiring management time and attention, any regulatory inquiry or investigation could itself result in further negative publicity regardless of its merit or outcome.

Maintaining and enhancing our brand may also require us to make substantial investments, and these investments may not be successful. For example, our trademarks are an important element of our brand. We have faced in the past, and may face in the future, oppositions from third parties to our applications to register key trademarks. If we are unsuccessful in defending against these oppositions, our trademark applications may be denied. Whether or not our trademark applications are denied, third parties may claim that our trademarks infringe their rights. As a result, we could be forced to pay significant settlement costs or cease the use of these trademarks and associated elements of our brand. Doing so could harm our brand recognition and adversely affect our business. If we fail to maintain and enhance our brand successfully, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business and financial results may be adversely affected.

If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our brand, results of operations and business could be harmed.

We have experienced rapid growth in our headcount and operations, including through our acquisitions of Qypeother businesses, such as Eat24 in October 2012 and SeatMe in July 2013,February 2015, which places substantial demands on management and our operational infrastructure. Most of our employees have been with us for fewer than two years. Weyears; to manage the expected growth of our operations, we will need to continue to increase the productivity of our current employees and hire, train and manage new employees. In particular, we intend to continue to make substantial investments in our technology,engineering organization as well as our U.S. and Canadian sales, and marketing and community management organizations. As we continue to grow,a result, we must effectively integrate, develop and motivate a large number of new employees, including employees in international markets and from any acquired businesses, while maintaining the beneficial aspects of our company culture. If



Table of Contents

As our business matures, we do not managemake periodic changes and adjustments to our organization in response to various internal and external considerations, including market opportunities, the growthcompetitive landscape, new and enhanced products, acquisitions, sales performance, increases in headcount and cost levels. In some instances, these changes have resulted in a temporary lack of focus and reduced productivity, which may occur again in connection with any future changes to our organization and may negatively affect our results of operations. Similarly, any significant changes to the way we structure compensation of our sales organization may be disruptive and may affect our ability to generate revenue.

To manage our growth, we may need to improve our operational, financial and management systems and processes, which may require significant capital expenditures and allocation of valuable management and employee resources, as well as subject us to the risk of over-expanding our operating infrastructure. For example, it can be difficult to train thousands of sales employees across multiple offices according to the same business standards, practices and laws, and we have been the subject of lawsuits alleging that we have failed to do so. For example, we are the subject of a putative class action lawsuit alleging that our sales force does not properly disclose that calls may be monitored or recorded for quality assurance. However, if we fail to scale our operations effectively,successfully and increase productivity, the quality of our platform and efficiency of our operations could suffer, which could harm our brand, results of operations and business.

We make the consumer experience our highest priority. Our dedication to making decisions based primarily on the best interests of consumers may cause us to forgo short-term gains and advertising revenue.

We base many of our decisions on the best interests of the consumers who use our platform. In the past, we have forgone, and we may in the future forgo, certain expansion or revenue opportunities that we do not believe are in the best interests of consumers, even if such decisions negatively impact our results of operations in the short term. For example, we phased out our brand advertising products in part because demand in the brand advertising market has shifted toward products disruptive to the consumer experience, such as video ads. Our approach of putting consumers first may negatively impact our relationship with existing or prospective advertisers. For example, unless we believe that a review violates our terms of service, such as reviews that contain hate speech or bigotry, we will allow the review to remain on our platform, even if the business disputes its accuracy. Certain advertisers may therefore perceive us as an impediment to their success as a result of negative reviews and ratings. This practice could result in a loss of advertisers, which in turn could harm our results of operations. However, we believe that this approach has been essential to our success in attracting users and increasing the frequency with which they use our platform. As a result, we believe this approach has served the long-term interests of our company and our stockholders and will continue to do so in the future.

We rely on the performance of highly skilled personnel, and if we are unable to attract, retain and motivate well-qualified employees, our business could be harmed.

We believe our success has depended, and continues to depend, on the efforts and talents of our employees, including our senior management team, software engineers, marketing professionals and advertising sales staff. All of our officers and other U.S. employees are at-will employees, which means they may terminate their employment relationship with us at any time, and their knowledge of our business and industry would be extremely difficult to replace. Any changes in our senior management team in particular may be disruptive to our business. For example, in 2016 we appointed a new Chief Financial Officer, and our long-time Chief Operating Officer stepped down from his position. If our senior management team, including our Chief Financial Officer or any other new hires that we may make, fails to work together effectively or execute our plans and strategies on a timely basis, our business could be harmed.

Our future also depends on our continuing ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled employees. Identifying, recruiting, training and integrating new hires will require significant time, expense and attention, and qualified individuals are in high demand; as a result, we may incur significant costs to attract them before we can validate their productivity. Volatility in the price of our common stock may make it more difficult or costly in the future to use equity compensation to motivate, incentivize and retain our employees. If we fail to manage our hiring needs effectively, our efficiency and ability to meet our forecasts, as well as employee morale, productivity and retention, could suffer, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.



Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Technology

Our business is dependent on the uninterrupted and proper operation of our technology and network infrastructure. Any significant disruption in our service could damage our reputation, result in a potential loss of users and engagement and adversely affect our results of operations.

It is important to our success that users in all geographies be able to access our platform at all times. We have previously experienced, and may experience in the future, service disruptions, outages and other performance problems. Such performance problems may be due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors and capacity constraints due to an overwhelming number of users accessing our platform simultaneously. Our products and services are highly technical and complex, and may contain errors or vulnerabilities that could result in unanticipated downtime for our platform and harm to our reputation and business. Users may also use our products in unanticipated ways that may cause a disruption in service for other users attempting to access our platform. We may encounter such difficulties more frequently as we acquire companies and incorporate their technologies into our service. It may also become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve the availability of our platform, especially during peak usage times, as our products become more complex and our user traffic increases.

In some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these performance problems within an acceptable period of time. If our platform is unavailable when users attempt to access it or it does not load as quickly as they expect, users may seek other services to obtain the information for which they are looking, and may not return to our platform as often in the future, or at all. This would negatively impact our ability to attract users and advertisers and increase the frequency with which they use our website and mobile app.

       It may become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve the availability of our platform, especially during peak usage times, as our solutions become more complex and our user traffic increases.platform. We expect to continue to make significant investments to maintain and improve the availability of our platform and to enable rapid releases of new features and products. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, upgrade our systems as needed and continually develop our technology and network architecture to accommodate actual and anticipated changes in technology, our business and operating results may be harmed.

Our systems and operations are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from catastrophic occurrences such as earthquakes, fires, floods, power losses, telecommunications failures, terrorist attacks and similar events. Our U.S. corporate offices and one of the facilities we lease to house our computer and telecommunications equipment are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, a region known for seismic activity. In addition, acts of terrorism, which may be targeted at metropolitan areas that have higher population densitydensities than rural areas, could cause disruptions in our or our local business advertisers’ businesses or the economy as a whole. We may not have sufficient protection or recovery plans in certain circumstances, such as natural disasters affecting the San Francisco Bay Area, and our business interruption insurance may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. Our disaster recovery program contemplates transitioning our platform and data to a backup center in the event of a catastrophe. Although this program is functional, if our primary data center shuts down, there will be a period of time that our services will remain shut down while the transition to the back-up data center takes place. During this time, our platform may be unavailable in whole or in part to our users.

22If our security measures are compromised, or if our platform is subject to attacks that degrade or deny the ability of users to access our content, users may curtail or stop use of our platform.


Our platform involves the storage and transmission of user and business information, some of which may be private, and security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss of this information, which could result in potential liability and litigation. Computer viruses, break-ins, malware, phishing attacks, attempts to overload servers with denial-of-service or other attacks and similar disruptions from unauthorized use of computer systems have become more prevalent in our industry, have occurred on our systems in the past and are expected to occur periodically on our systems in the future. We may be a particularly compelling target for such attacks as a result of our brand recognition. User and business owner accounts and listing pages could be hacked, hijacked, altered or otherwise claimed or controlled by unauthorized persons. For example, we enable businesses to create free online accounts and claim the business listing pages for each of their business locations. Although we take steps to confirm that the person setting up the account is affiliated with the business, our verification systems could fail to confirm that such person is an authorized representative of the business, or mistakenly allow an unauthorized person to claim the business’s listing page. In addition, we face risks associated with security breaches affecting our third-party partners and service providers. A security breach at any such third party could be perceived by consumers as a security breach of our systems and result in negative publicity, damage to our reputation and expose us to other losses.



WeTable of Contents

Although none of the disruptions we have experienced to date have had a material effect on our business, any future disruptions could lead to interruptions, delays or website shutdowns, causing loss of critical data or the unauthorized disclosure or use of personally identifiable or other confidential information. Even if we experience no significant shutdown or no critical data is lost, obtained or misused in connection with an attack, the occurrence of such attack or the perception that we are vulnerable to such attacks may harm our reputation, our ability to retain existing users and our ability to attract new users. Although we have developed systems and processes that are designed to protect our data and prevent data loss and other security breaches, the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently, often are not recognized until launched against a target or long after, and may inoriginate from less regulated and more remote areas around the futureworld. As a result, these preventative measures may not be adequate and we cannot assure you that they will provide absolute security.

Any or all of these issues could negatively impact our ability to attract new users, deter current users from returning to our platform, cause existing or potential advertisers to cancel their contracts or subject us to third-party lawsuits or other liabilities. For example, we work with a third-party vendor to process credit card payments by users and businesses, and are subject to payment card association operating rules. Compliance with applicable operating rules will not necessarily prevent illegal or improper use of our payment systems, or the theft, loss or misuse of payment information, however. If our security measures fail to prevent fraudulent credit card transactions and protect payment information adequately as a result of employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, or we fail to comply with the applicable operating rules, we could be liable to the users and businesses for their losses, as well as the vendor under our agreement with it, and be subject to disputesfines and assertions by third parties that we violate their rights. These disputes may be costlyhigher transaction fees. In addition, government authorities could also initiate legal or regulatory actions against us in connection with such incidents, which could cause us to defendincur significant expense and could harmliability or result in orders or consent decrees forcing us to modify our business and operating results.

       We currently face, and we expect to face from time to time in the future, allegations that we have violated the rights of third parties, including patent, trademark, copyright and other intellectual property rights and the rights of current and former employees, users and business owners. For example, certain of our users have sued us claiming that they were in fact Yelp employees and should have received minimum wage for their time spent writing reviews. Other users have brought suit alleging that we violated their privacy rights when our mobile app accessed certain data on their mobile devices. Various businesses have also sued us alleging that we manipulate Yelp reviews in order to coerce them and other businesses to pay for Yelp advertising.

       Companies in the Internet, technology and media industries own large numbers of patent and other intellectual property rights, and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of such rights. In addition, various “non-practicing entities” that own patents and other intellectual property rights often aggressively attempt to assert their rights in order to extract value from technology companies. From time to time, we receive notice letters from patent holders alleging that certain of our products and services infringe their patent rights. We do not own any patents, and, therefore, may be unable to deter competitors or others from pursuing patent or other intellectual property infringement claims against us. We presently are involved in numerous patent lawsuits, all of which involve plaintiffs targeting multiple defendants in the same or similar suits.

       Other claims against us can be expected to be made in the future, and as we face increasing competition and gain an increasingly high profile, we expect the number of claims against us to accelerate. The results of litigation and claims to which we may be subject cannot be predicted with certainty. Even if the claims are without merit, the costs associated with defending these types of claims may be substantial, both in terms of time, money and management distraction. In particular, patent and other intellectual property litigation may be protracted and expensive, and the results are difficult to predict and may require us to stop offering certain features, purchase licenses or modify our products and features while we develop non-infringing substitutes or may result in significant settlement costs. Even if these matters do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor or without significant cash settlements, these matters, and the time and resources necessary to litigate or resolve them, could harm our business, results of operations and reputation.practices.

Some of our products contain open source software, which may pose particular risks to our proprietary software and solutions.

We use open source software in our products and will use open source software in the future. From time to time, we may face claims from third parties claiming ownership of, or demanding release of, the open source software or derivative works that we developed using such software (which could include our proprietary source code), or otherwise seeking to enforce the terms of the applicable open source license. These claims could result in litigation and could require us to purchase a costly license or cease offering the implicated solutions unless and until we can re-engineer them to avoid infringement. This re-engineering process could require significant additional research and development resources. In addition to risks related to license requirements, use of certain open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software asbecause open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of the software. Any of these risks could be difficult to eliminate or manage, and, if not addressed, could have a negative effect on our business and operating results.

Failure to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights could harm our business and results of operations.

We regard the protection of our trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks, patent rights and domain names as critical to our success. In particular, we must maintain, protect and enhance the “Yelp” brand. We pursue the registration of our domain names, trademarks and service marks in the United States and in certain jurisdictions abroad. While we are pursuing a number of patent applications, we currently have only limited patent protection for our core business, which may make it more difficult to assert certain of our intellectual property rights. We strive to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state and common law rights, as well as contractual restrictions. We typically enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, as well as confidentiality agreements with parties with whom we conduct business in order to limit access to, and disclosure and use of, our proprietary information. However, these contractual arrangements and the consumer experienceother steps we have taken to protect our highest priority. Our dedicationintellectual property may not prevent the misappropriation or disclosure of our proprietary information or deter independent development of similar technologies by others.



Table of Contents

Effective trade secret, copyright, trademark, patent and domain name protection is expensive to making decisions based primarilydevelop and maintain, both in terms of initial and ongoing registration requirements and expenses and the costs of defending our rights. Seeking protection for our intellectual property, including trademarks and domain names, is an expensive process and may not be successful, and we may not do so in every location in which we operate. Similarly, the process of obtaining patent protection is expensive and time consuming, and we may not be able to prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Even if issued, there can be no assurance that these patents will adequately protect our intellectual property, as the legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of patent and other intellectual property rights are uncertain. Litigation may become necessary to enforce our patent or other intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. For example, we may incur significant costs in enforcing our trademarks against those who attempt to imitate our “Yelp” brand. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We may be unable to continue to use the domain names that we use in our business, or prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar to, or otherwise decrease the best interestsvalue of consumersour brand or our trademarks or service marks.

We have registered domain names for the websites that we use in our business, such as Yelp.com. If we lose the ability to use a domain name, whether due to trademark claims, failure to renew the applicable registration or any other cause, we may be forced to market our products under a new domain name, which could cause us substantial harm or cause us to forgo short-term gainsincur significant expense in order to purchase rights to the domain name in question. In addition, our competitors and advertising revenue.

others could attempt to capitalize on our brand recognition by using domain names similar to ours. Domain names similar to ours have been registered by others in the United States and elsewhere. We base manymay be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar to or otherwise decrease the value of our decisions uponbrand or our trademarks or service marks. Protecting and enforcing our rights in our domain names may require litigation, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention.

Risks Related to Our Financial Statements and Tax Matters

We have incurred significant operating losses in the best interests of the consumers who use our platform. We believe that this approach has been essential to our success in increasing our user growth rate and the frequency with which consumers use our platform and has served the long-term interests of our company and our stockholders. In the past, we have forgone, and we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to maintain profitability. Our recent growth rate will likely not be sustainable, and a failure to maintain an adequate growth rate will adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses and, as of December 31, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $70.2 million. Although our revenues have grown rapidly in the future forgo, certain expansion orlast several years, increasing from $12.1 million in 2008 to $713.1 million in 2016, our revenue opportunities that we do not believe aregrowth rate has declined in the best interests of consumers, even if such decisions negatively impact our results of operations in the short term, and we believe that continued adherence to this principle will, in the long term, benefit our stockholders. In particular, our approach of putting our consumers first may negatively impact our relationships with our existing or prospective advertisers. For example, unless we believe that a review violates our terms of service, such as reviews that contain hate speech or bigotry, we allow the review to remain on the platform, even if the business disputes its accuracy. Certain advertisers may therefore perceive us as an impediment to their successrecent periods as a result of negative reviews and ratings. This practice could result in a lossvariety of advertisers, which in turn could harm our results of operations.

23



We rely on third-party service providers for many aspectsfactors, including the maturation of our business and the gradual decline in the number of major geographic markets within the United States and Canada to which we have not already expanded. While our recently announced plans to focus our sales and marketing resources primarily on the United States and Canada may result in some cost savings, they also limit the markets from which we generate revenue and our ability to expand internationally in the future. We expect that the more immediate loss of revenue will be immaterial, but we cannot predict the impact of these plans on our long-term international prospects or the impact that a smaller international footprint may have on our brand and reputation.

We incurred net losses in the year ended December 31, 2015 and in the first quarter of 2016. As a result, you should not rely on the revenue growth of any failureprior quarterly or annual period, or the net income we realized in 2014, as an indication of our future performance. Historically, our costs have increased each year and we expect our costs to increase in future periods as we continue to expend substantial financial resources on:

sales and marketing;
our technology infrastructure;
product and feature development;
market development efforts;
strategic opportunities, including commercial relationships and acquisitions; and
general administration, including legal and accounting expenses related to being a public company.


Table of Contents

These investments may not result in increased revenue or growth in our business. Our costs may also increase as we hire additional employees, particularly as a result of the significant competition that we face to attract and retain technical talent. Our expenses may grow faster than our revenue and may be greater than we anticipate in a particular period or over time. If we are unable to maintain adequate revenue growth and to manage our expenses, we may continue to incur significant losses in the future and may not be able to maintain profitability.

We have a limited operating history in an evolving industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and may increase the risk that we will not be successful.

We have a limited operating history in an evolving industry that may not develop as expected, if at all. As a result, our historical operating results may not be indicative of our future operating results, making it difficult to assess our future prospects. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we may encounter in this rapidly evolving industry, which we may not be able to address successfully. These risks and difficulties include our ability to, among other things:

increase the number of users of our website and mobile app and the number of reviews and other content on our platform;
attract and retain new advertising clients, many of which may have limited or no online advertising experience;
forecast revenue and adjusted EBITDA accurately, which is made more difficult by the large percentage of our revenue derived from performance-based advertising, as well as appropriately estimate and plan our expenses;
continue to earn and preserve a reputation for providing meaningful and reliable reviews of local businesses;
effectively monetize our mobile products as usage continues to migrate toward mobile devices;
successfully compete with existing and future providers of other forms of offline and online advertising;
successfully compete with other companies that are currently in, or may in the future enter, the business of providing information regarding local businesses;
successfully manage our growth;
successfully develop and deploy new features and products;
manage and integrate successfully any acquisitions of businesses, solutions or technologies, such as Nowait;
avoid interruptions or disruptions in our service or slower than expected load times;
develop a scalable, high-performance technology infrastructure that can efficiently and reliably handle increased usage, as well as the deployment of new features and products;
hire, integrate and retain talented sales and other personnel;
effectively manage rapid growth in our sales force, other personnel and operations; and
effectively identify, engage and manage third-party partners and service providers.

If the demand for information regarding local businesses does not develop as we expect, or if we fail to address the needs of this demand, our business will be harmed. We may not be able to address successfully these relationshipsrisks and difficulties or others, including those described elsewhere in these risk factors. Failure to address these risks and difficulties adequately could harm our business.

       We rely on data about local businesses from third parties, including various yellow pagesbusiness and other third parties that license such informationcause our operating results to us. We also rely on third parties for other aspects of our business, such as mapping functionality and administrative software solutions. If these third parties experience difficulty meeting our requirements or standards, or our licenses are revoked or not renewed, it could make it difficult for us to operate some aspects of our business, which could damage our reputation. In addition, if such third-party service providers were to cease operations, temporarily or permanently, face financial distress or other business disruption, increase their fees or if our relationships with these providers deteriorate, we could suffer increased costs and delays in our ability to provide consumers and advertisers with content or provide similar services until an equivalent provider could be found or we could develop replacement technology or operations.suffer.

We expect a number of factors to cause our operating results to fluctuate on a quarterly and annual basis, which may make it difficult to predict our future performance.

Our operating results could vary significantly from quarterperiod to quarter and year to year becauseperiod as a result of a variety of factors, many of which aremay be outside of our control. As a result,This volatility increases the difficulty in predicting our future performance and means comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. In addition to the other risk factors discussed in this section, factors that may contribute to the variabilityvolatility of our quarterly and annualoperating results include:

24



us.

Because we recognize most of the revenue from our advertising products over the term of an agreement, a significant downturn in our business may not be immediately reflected in our results of operations.

We recognize revenue from sales of our advertising products over the terms of the applicable agreements, which are generally three, six or 12 months. As a result, a significant portion of the revenue we report in each quarter is generated from agreements entered into during previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in new or renewed agreements in any one quarter may not significantly impact our revenue in that quarter but will negatively affect our revenue in future quarters. In addition, we may be unable to adjust our fixed costs in response to reduced revenue. Accordingly, the effect of significant declines in advertising sales may not be reflected in our short-term results of operations.



We rely on the performanceTable of highly skilled personnel, and if we are unable to attract, retain and motivate well-qualified employees, our business could be harmed.Contents

       We believe our success has depended, and continues to depend, on the efforts and talents of our employees, including our senior management team, software engineers, marketing professionals and advertising sales staff. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified and skilled employees. Qualified individuals are in high demand, and we may incur significant costs to attract them. As we mature, the incentives to attract, retain and motivate employees provided by our equity awards, for example, may not be as effective as in the past, and if we issue significant equity to attract additional employees, the ownership of our existing stockholders may be further diluted and our expenses may significantly increase.

       In addition, the loss of any of our senior management or key employees could materially adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan, and we may not be able to find adequate replacements. All of our officers and other U.S. employees are at-will employees, which means they may terminate their employment relationship with us at any time, and their knowledge of our business and industry would be extremely difficult to replace. We cannot ensure that we will be able to retain the services of any members of our senior management or other key employees. If we do not succeed in attracting well-qualified employees or retaining and motivating existing employees, our business could be harmed.

Failure to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights could harm our business and results of operations.

       We regard the protection of our trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks and domain names as critical to our success. In particular, we must maintain, protect and enhance the “Yelp” brand. We pursue the registration of our domain names, trademarks and service marks in the United States and in certain jurisdictions abroad. We strive to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on federal, state and common law rights, as well as contractual restrictions. We typically enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, and confidentiality agreements with parties with whom we conduct business in order to limit access to, and disclosure and use of, our proprietary information. However, these contractual arrangements and the other steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not prevent the misappropriation or disclosure of our proprietary information nor deter independent development of similar technologies by others.

25



       Effective trade secret, copyright, trademark and domain name protection is expensive to develop and maintain, both in terms of initial and ongoing registration requirements and expenses and the costs of defending our rights. We are seeking to protect our trademarks and domain names in an increasing number of jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and may not be successful or which we may not pursue in every location. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our respective trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights claimed by others. Any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. We may incur significant costs in enforcing our trademarks against those who attempt to imitate our “Yelp” brand. If we fail to maintain, protect and enhance our intellectual property rights, our business and operating results may be harmed.

We may be unable to continue to use the domain names that we use in our business, or prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar to, or otherwise decrease the value of our brand or our trademarks or service marks.

       We have registered domain names for our website that we use in our business, such as Yelp.com. If we lose the ability to use a domain name, whether due to trademark claims, failure to renew the applicable registration, or any other cause, we may be forced to market our products under a new domain name, which could cause us substantial harm, or to incur significant expense in order to purchase rights to the domain name in question. In addition, our competitors and others could attempt to capitalize on our brand recognition by using domain names similar to ours. Domain names similar to ours have been registered in the United States and elsewhere. We may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe on, are similar to, or otherwise decrease the value of our brand or our trademarks or service marks. Protecting and enforcing our rights in our domain names may require litigation, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention.

If our security measures are compromised,goodwill or ifintangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to our platform is subjectincome statement.

We have recorded a significant amount of goodwill related to attacks that degradeour acquisitions to date, and a significant portion of the purchase price of any companies we acquire in the future may be allocated to acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. Under GAAP, we review our intangible assets for impairment when events or denychanges in circumstances indicate the ability of users to access our content, users may curtail or stop usecarrying value of our platform.

       Our platform involves the storagegoodwill and transmission of user and business information, some of whichother intangible assets may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be private,considered include declines in our stock price, market capitalization and security breachesfuture cash flow projections. If our acquisitions do not yield expected returns, our stock price declines or any other adverse change in market conditions occurs, a change to the estimation of fair value could expose us to a risk of loss of this information, whichresult. Any such change could result in potential liabilityan impairment charge to our goodwill and litigation. Like all online services, our platform is vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins, phishing attacks, attempts to overload our servers with denial-of-service or other attacks and similar disruptions from unauthorized useintangible assets, particularly if such change impacts any of our computer systems, any of which could lead to interruptions, delayscritical assumptions or website shutdowns, causing loss of critical data or the unauthorized disclosure or use of personally identifiable or other confidential information. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently, often are not recognized until launched against a targetestimates, and may originate from less regulatedhave a negative impact on our financial position and more remote areas around the world, we may be unable to proactively address these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. User and business owner accounts and profile pages could also be hacked, hijacked, altered or otherwise claimed or controlled by unauthorized persons. For example, we enable businesses to create free online business accounts and claim the business profile pages for each of their business locations. We verify these claims through an automated telephone verification process, which is designed to confirm that the person setting up the account is affiliated with the business by confirming that the person has access to the business’s telephone. Our verification system could fail to confirm that the recipient of the call is an authorized representative of the business, or mistakenly allow an unauthorized representative to claim the business’s profile page.

       Any or all of these issues could negatively impact our ability to attract new users or could deter current users from returning or reduce the frequency with which consumers and advertisers use our solutions, cause existing or potential advertisers to cancel their contracts or subject us to third-party lawsuits or other action or liability, thereby harming our results of operations. Government authorities could also initiate legal or regulatory actions against us in connection with such incidents, which could cause us to incur significant expense and liability or result in orders or consent decrees forcing us to modify our business practices. For example, we work with third party vendors to process credit card payments by certain of our users and local businesses and are subject to payment card association operating rules. If our security measures fail to protect this information adequately as a result of employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, or we fail to comply with the applicable operating rules, we could be liable to our users and local businesses for their losses, as well as the vendors under our agreements with them; be subject to fines and higher transaction fees; face regulatory action; and our users, local businesses and vendors could end their relationships with us, any of which could harm our business and financial results.

26



Domestic and foreign laws may be interpreted and enforced in ways that impose new obligations on us with respect to Yelp Deals, which may harm our business and results of operations.

       Our Yelp Deals products may be deemed gift certificates, store gift cards, general-use prepaid cards or other vouchers, or “gift cards,” subject to, among other laws, the federal Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, or the Credit CARD Act, and similar federal, state and foreign laws. Many of these laws include specific disclosure requirements and prohibitions or limitations on the use of expiration dates and the imposition of certain fees. For example, the Credit CARD Act requires that gift cards expire no earlier than five years after their issue. Yelp Deals are comprised of two components: (i) the purchase value, which is the amount paid by the purchaser and which does not expire, and (ii) the promotional value, which is the remaining value for which the Yelp Deal can be redeemed during a limited period, which typically ends one year after the date of purchase. If, contrary to our belief, the Credit CARD Act and similar state laws were held to apply to the promotional value component of Yelp Deals, consumers would be entitled to redeem the promotional value component of their Yelp Deals for up to five years after their issue, and we could face liability for redemption periods that are less than five years. Various companies that provide deal products similar to ours are currently defendants in purported class action lawsuits that have been filed in federal and state court claiming that their deal products are subject to the Credit CARD Act and various state laws governing gift cards and that the defendants have violated these laws as a result of expiration dates and other restrictions they have placed on their deals. Similar lawsuits have been filed in other locations in which we plan to sell our Yelp Deals, such as the Canadian province of Ontario, alleging similar violations of provincial legislation governing gift cards.

       The application of various other laws and regulations to our products, and particularly our Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates, is uncertain. These include laws and regulations pertaining to unclaimed and abandoned property, partial redemption, refunds, revenue-sharing restrictions on certain trade groups and professions, sales and other local taxes and the sale of alcoholic beverages. For example, although it is the responsibility of merchants to redeem or refund unexpired Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates that they offer through our platform, the law might be interpreted to require that we redeem or refund them. Because merchants alone, and not Yelp, are in a position to track the redemption of Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates, we may not be able to comply with such a requirement without substantial and potentially costly changes to our infrastructure and business practices. In addition, we may become, or be determined to be, subject to federal, state or foreign laws regulating money transmitters or aimed at preventing money laundering or terrorist financing, including the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act and other similar future laws or regulations.

       If we become subject to claims or are required to alter our business practices as a result of current or future laws and regulations, our revenue could decrease, our costs could increase and our business could otherwise be harmed. In addition, the costs and expenses associated with defending any actions related to such additional laws and regulations and any payments of related penalties, fines, judgments or settlements could harm our business.

We may require additional capital to support business growth, and thissuch capital might not be available on acceptable terms, if at all.

We intend to continue to make investments to supportinvest in our business growth and may require or otherwise seek additional funds to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new features and products, or enhance our existing services, improve our operating infrastructure orand acquire complementary businesses and technologies. Accordingly,As a result, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our Class A common stock. Any future debt financing we secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may be harmed.

27



The intendedWe may have exposure to greater than anticipated tax benefits ofliabilities.

Our income tax obligations are based in part on our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements depend on the application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions and on how we operate our business.

       Our corporateoperating structure and intercompany arrangements, including the manner in which we develop, value and use our intellectual property and the transfer pricingvaluations of our intercompany transactions, are intended to reducetransactions. For example, our worldwide effective tax rate. The application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions, including the United States, to our international business activities is subject to interpretation and depends on our ability to operate our business in a manner consistent with our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements. The taxing authorities of the jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for valuing developed technology or intercompany arrangements, including our transfer pricing, or determine that the manner in which we operate our business does not achieve the intended tax consequences, which could increase our worldwide effective tax rate and harm our financial position and results of operations.

       Our corporate structure includes legal entities located in jurisdictions with income tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate. Our intercompany arrangements allocate income to such entities in accordance with arm’s-lengtharm’s length principles and commensurate with functions performed, risks assumed and ownership of valuable corporate assets. We believe that income taxed in certain foreign jurisdictions at a lower rate relative to the U.S. statutory rate will have a beneficial impact on our worldwide effective tax rate.

       SignificantHowever, significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax positions and determining our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory rates, by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations.

In addition, the application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions, including the United States, to our international business activities is subject to interpretation and depends on our ability to operate our business in a manner consistent with our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements. The taxing authorities of jurisdictions in which we operate may challenge our methodologies for valuing developed technology or intercompany arrangements, including our transfer pricing, or determine that the manner in which we operate our business does not achieve the intended tax consequences, which could increase our worldwide effective tax rate and harm our financial position and results of operations. As we operate in numerous taxing jurisdictions, the application of tax laws can also be subject to diverging and sometimes conflicting interpretations by tax authorities of these jurisdictions. It is not uncommon for taxing authorities in different countries to have conflicting views, for instance, with respect to, among other things, the manner in which the arm’s lengtharm’s-length standard is applied for transfer pricing purposes, or with respect to the valuation of intellectual property. In addition,



Table of Contents

Changes in tax laws or tax rulings, or the examination of our tax positions, could materially affect our financial position and results of operations.

Tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. In particular, there is uncertainty in relation to the U.S. tax legislation not only in terms of the future corporate tax rate, but also the U.S. tax consequences of income derived from income related to intellectual property earned overseas in low tax jurisdictions.

Our existing corporate structure and intercompany arrangements have been implemented in a manner we believe is in compliance with current prevailing tax laws. However, the tax benefits whichthat we intend to eventually derive could be undermined if we are unable to adapt the manner in which we operate our business and due to changing tax laws.

Changes in tax laws or tax rulings could materially affect our financial position and results of operations.

       The In particular, the current U.S. administration and key members of Congress have made public statements indicating that tax reform is a priority.priority, resulting in uncertainty not only with respect to the future corporate tax rate, but also the U.S. tax consequences of income derived from income related to intellectual property earned overseas in low tax jurisdictions. Certain changes to U.S. tax laws, including limitations on the ability to defer U.S. taxation on earnings outside of the United States until those earnings are repatriated to the United States, as well as changes to U.S. tax laws that may be enacted in the future, could affect the tax treatment of our foreign earnings.

In addition, many countriesthe taxing authorities in the European Union, as well as a number ofUnited States and other countries and organizations such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, are actively considering changes to existing tax laws, that if enacted could increase our tax obligations in many countriesjurisdictions where we do business. Due tobusiness regularly examine our income and other tax returns. The ultimate outcome of these examinations cannot be predicted with certainty. Should the expanding scaleIRS or other taxing authorities assess additional taxes as a result of our international business activities, any changes in the taxation of such activities may increase our worldwide effective tax rate and harm our financial position and results of operations.

28



If our goodwill or intangible assets become impaired,examinations, we may be required to record a significant chargecharges to earnings.our operations, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our business and results of operations may be harmed if we are deemed responsible for the collection and remittance of state sales taxes for Eat24’s restaurants.

       Under accounting principles generally acceptedIf we are deemed an agent for the restaurants in our Eat24 network under state tax law, we may be deemed responsible for collecting and remitting sales taxes directly to certain states. It is possible that one or more states could seek to impose sales, use or other tax collection obligations on us with regard to such food sales. These taxes may be applicable to past sales. A successful assertion that we should be collecting additional sales, use or other taxes or remitting such taxes directly to states could result in substantial tax liabilities for past sales and additional administrative expenses, which would harm our business and results of operations. In addition, we rely on the restaurants in our Eat24 network to provide us with the correct sales tax rates for each individual order. If such information proves incorrect, we may be liable for the under or over collection of sales tax from Eat24 customers.

We rely on data from both internal tools and third parties to calculate certain of our performance metrics. Real or perceived inaccuracies in such metrics may harm our reputation and negatively affect our business.

We track certain performance metrics — including the number of unique devices accessing our mobile app in a given period, page views and calls and clicks for directions and map views — with internal tools, which are not independently verified by any third party. Our internal tools have a number of limitations and our methodologies for tracking these metrics may change over time, which could result in unexpected changes to our metrics, including key metrics that we report. For example, our metrics may be affected by mobile applications that automatically contact our servers for regular updates with no discernible user action involved; this activity can cause our system to count the device associated with the app as an app unique device in a given period. If the internal tools we use to track these metrics over- or under-count performance or contain algorithm or other technical errors, the data we report may not be accurate. In addition, limitations or errors with respect to how we measure data may affect our understanding of certain details of our business, which could affect our longer-term strategies.

In addition, certain of our key metrics — the number of our desktop unique visitors and mobile website unique visitors — are calculated relying on data from third parties. While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable calculations for the applicable periods of measurement, our third-party providers periodically encounter difficulties in providing accurate data for such metrics as a result of a variety of factors, including human and software errors. We expect these challenges to continue to occur, and potentially to increase as our traffic grows.



Table of Contents

There are also inherent challenges in measuring usage across our large user base. For example, because these metrics are based on users with unique cookies, an individual who accesses our website from multiple devices with different cookies may be counted as multiple unique visitors, and multiple individuals who access our website from a shared device with a single cookie may be counted as a single unique visitor. In addition, although we use technology designed to block low-quality traffic, such as robots, spiders and other software, we may not be able to prevent all such traffic, and such technology may have the effect of blocking some valid traffic. For these and other reasons, the calculations of our desktop unique visitors and mobile website unique visitors may not accurately reflect the number of people actually using our platform.

Our measures of traffic and other key metrics may differ from estimates published by third parties (other than those whose data we use to calculate our key metrics) or from similar metrics of our competitors. We are continually seeking to improve our ability to measure these key metrics, and regularly review our processes to assess potential improvements to their accuracy. However, if our users, advertisers, partners and stockholders do not perceive our metrics to be accurate representations, or if we discover material inaccuracies in our metrics, our reputation may be harmed.

Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance and Legal Matters

We are, and may be in the future, subject to disputes and assertions by third parties that we violate their rights. These disputes may be costly to defend and could harm our business and operating results.

We currently face, and we expect to face from time to time in the future, allegations that we have violated the rights of third parties, including patent, trademark, copyright and other intellectual property rights, and the rights of current and former employees, users and business owners. For example, various businesses have sued us alleging that we manipulate Yelp reviews in order to coerce them and other businesses to pay for Yelp advertising. The nature of our business also exposes us to claims relating to the information posted on our platform, including claims for defamation, libel, negligence and copyright or trademark infringement, among others. Businesses have in the past claimed, and may in the future claim, that we are responsible for the defamatory reviews posted by our users. We expect claims like these to continue, and potentially increase in proportion to the amount of content on our platform. In some instances, we may elect or be compelled to remove the content that is the subject of such claims, or may be forced to pay substantial damages if we are unsuccessful in our efforts to defend against these claims. If we elect or are compelled to remove content from our platform, our products and services may become less useful to consumers and our traffic may decline, which would have a negative impact on our business.

We are also regularly exposed to claims based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. Companies in the Internet, technology and media industries own large numbers of patent and other intellectual property rights, and frequently enter into litigation. Various “non-practicing entities” that own patents and other intellectual property rights also often aggressively attempt to assert their rights in order to extract value from technology companies. From time to time, we receive notice letters from patent holders alleging that certain of our products and services infringe their patent rights, and we are presently involved in numerous patent lawsuits, including lawsuits involving plaintiffs targeting multiple defendants in the same or similar suits. While we are pursuing a number of patent applications, we currently have only one issued patent, and the contractual restrictions and trade secrets that protect our proprietary technology provide only limited safeguards against infringement. This may make it more difficult to defend certain of our intellectual property rights, particularly related to our core business.

We expect other claims to be made against us in the future, and as we face increasing competition and gain an increasingly high profile, we expect the number of claims against us to accelerate. The results of litigation and claims to which we may be subject cannot be predicted with any certainty. Even if the claims are without merit, the costs associated with defending against them may be substantial in terms of time, money and management distraction. In particular, patent and other intellectual property litigation may be protracted and expensive, and the results may require us to stop offering certain features, purchase licenses or modify our products and features while we develop non-infringing substitutes, or otherwise involve significant settlement costs. The development of alternative non-infringing technology or practices could require significant effort and expense or may not be feasible. Even if claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor without significant cash settlements, such matters, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could harm our business, results of operations and reputation.



Table of Contents

Our business is subject to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign regulations and other legal obligations related to privacy, data protection and other matters. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such regulations and obligations could harm our business.

We are subject to a variety of laws in the United States and abroad that involve matters central to our business, including laws regarding privacy, data retention, distribution of America,user-generated content and consumer protection, among others. For example, because we receive, store and process personal information and other user data, including credit card information, we are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws around the world regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, processing, disclosure and protection of personal information and other user data. We are also subject to a variety of laws, regulations and guidelines that regulate the way we distinguish paid search results and other types of advertising from unpaid search results.  

The application and interpretation of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate. For example, we rely on laws limiting the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties. These laws are currently being tested by a number of claims, including actions based on invasion of privacy and other torts, unfair competition, copyright and trademark infringement and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the ads posted or GAAP,the content provided by users. It is difficult to predict how existing laws will be applied to our business, and if our business grows and evolves and our solutions are used in a greater number of countries, we reviewwill also become subject to laws and regulations in additional jurisdictions, which may be inconsistent with the laws of the jurisdictions to which we are currently subject. For example, the risk related to liability for third-party actions may be greater in certain jurisdictions outside the United States where our intangible assetsprotection from such liability may be unclear.

It is also possible that the interpretation and application of various laws and regulations may conflict with other rules or our practices, such as industry standards to which we adhere, our privacy policies and our privacy-related obligations to third parties (including, in certain instances, voluntary third-party certification bodies). Similarly, our business could be adversely affected if new legislation or regulations are adopted that require us to change our current practices or the design of our platform, products or features. For example, regulatory frameworks for impairment when eventsprivacy issues are currently in flux worldwide, and are likely to remain so for the foreseeable future due to increased public scrutiny of the practices of companies offering online services with respect to personal information of their users. The U.S. government, including the White House, the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Commerce and many state governments are reviewing the need for greater regulation of the collection, processing, storage and use of information about consumer behavior on the Internet, including regulation aimed at restricting certain targeted advertising practices. The European Commission recently approved a new safe harbor program, the E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield, covering the transfer of personal data from the European Union to the United States, and a new general data protection regulation is expected to take effect in the European Union by 2018, each of which may be subject to varying interpretations and evolving practices, which would create uncertainty for us and possibly result in significantly greater compliance burdens for companies such as us with users and operations in Europe. Changes like these could increase our administrative costs and make it more difficult for consumers to use our platform, resulting in less traffic and revenue. Such changes could also make it more difficult for us to provide effective advertising tools to businesses on our platform, resulting in fewer advertisers and less revenue.

We believe that our policies and practices comply with applicable laws and regulations. However, if our belief proves incorrect, if these guidelines, laws or changesregulations or their interpretations change or new legislation or regulations are enacted, or if the third parties with whom we share user information fail to comply with such guidelines, laws, regulations or their contractual obligations to us, we may be forced to implement new measures to reduce our legal exposure. This may require us to expend substantial resources, delay development of new products or discontinue certain products or features, which would negatively impact our business. For example, if we fail to comply with our privacy-related obligations to users or third parties, or any compromise of security that results in circumstances indicate the carrying valueunauthorized release or transfer of personally identifiable information or other user data, we may be compelled to provide additional disclosures to our users, obtain additional consents from our users before collecting or using their information or implement new safeguards to help our users manage our use of their information, among other changes. We may also face litigation, governmental enforcement actions or negative publicity, which could cause our users and advertisers to lose trust in us and have an adverse effect on our business. For example, from time to time we receive inquiries from government agencies regarding our business practices. Although the internal resources expended and expenses incurred in connection with such inquiries and their resolutions have not been material to date, any resulting negative publicity could adversely affect our reputation and brand. Responding to and resolving any future litigation, investigations, settlements or other regulatory actions may require significant time and resources, and could diminish confidence in and the use of our products.



Table of Contents

Domestic and certain foreign laws may be recoverable. Goodwillinterpreted and enforced in ways that impose new obligations on us with respect to Yelp Deals, which may harm our business and results of operations.

Our Yelp Deals products may be deemed gift certificates, store gift cards, general-use prepaid cards or other vouchers, or “gift cards,” subject to, among other laws, the federal Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (the “Credit CARD Act”) and similar state and foreign laws. Many of these laws include specific disclosure requirements and prohibitions or limitations on the use of expiration dates and the imposition of certain fees. Various companies that provide deal products similar to ours have been subject to allegations that their deal products are subject to and violate the Credit CARD Act and various state laws governing gift cards. Lawsuits have also been filed in other locations in which we sell or plan to sell our Yelp Deals, such as the Canadian province of Ontario, alleging similar violations of provincial legislation governing gift cards.

The application of various other laws and regulations to our products, and particularly our Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates, is uncertain. These include laws and regulations pertaining to unclaimed and abandoned property, partial redemption, refunds, revenue-sharing restrictions on certain trade groups and professions, sales and other local taxes and the sale of alcoholic beverages. In addition, we may become, or be determined to be, subject to federal, state or foreign laws regulating money transmitters or aimed at preventing money laundering or terrorist financing, including the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act and other similar future laws or regulations.

If we become subject to claims or are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered includealter our business practices as a change in circumstances indicating that the carrying valueresult of our goodwill or other intangible assets may not be recoverable include declines in our stock price and market capitalizationcurrent or future cash flows projections. We recorded a significant amount of goodwilllaws and regulations, our revenue could decrease, our costs could increase and our business could otherwise be harmed. In addition, the costs and expenses associated with defending any actions related to such additional laws and regulations and any payments of related penalties, fines, judgments or settlements could harm our acquisitionbusiness.

The requirements of Qypebeing a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations has increased, and will likely continue to increase, our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly, and place significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources. In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in the fourth quartermany cases due to their lack of 2012specificity, and, our acquisition of SeatMeas a result, their application in the third quarter of 2013. A decline in our stock price, or any other adverse change in market conditions, particularly if such change has the effect of changing one of our critical assumptions or estimates,practice may evolve over time. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters, higher administrative expenses and a changediversion of management’s time and attention. Further, if our compliance efforts differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed. Being a public company that is subject to these rules and regulations also makes it more expensive for us to obtain and retain director and officer liability insurance, and we may in the estimationfuture be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain or retain adequate coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of fair value that could result in an impairment charge to our goodwillboard of directors and intangible assets. Any such material charges may have a material negative impact on our financial and operating results.qualified executive officers.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock

The dual class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with those stockholders who held our stock prior to ourinitial public offering, including our founders, directors, executive officers and employees and their affiliates, and limiting your ability to influence corporate matters.

       Our Class B common stock has 10 votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. Stockholders who hold shares of Class B common stock, including our founders, directors, executive officers and employees and their affiliates, together beneficially own shares representing approximately 66% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock as of December 31, 2013. Consequently, the holders of Class B common stock collectively will continue to be able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval even though their stock holdings represent less than 50% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Because of the 10-to-1 voting ratio between our Class B and Class A common stock, the holders of our Class B common stock collectively will continue to control a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock even when the shares of Class B common stock represent a small minority of all outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, and, as a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected. Future transfers by holders of Class B common stock will generally result in those shares converting to Class A common stock, which will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who retain their shares in the long term, which may include existing founders, officers and directors and their affiliates.

Our share price has been and will likely continue to be volatile.

The trading price of our Class A common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. During fiscal year 2013,2016, our Class A common stock’s daily closing price has ranged from $19.70$15.23 to $74.89.$42.16, and was $33.47 on February 23, 2017. In addition to the factors discussed in this Risk Factors“Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Annual Report, factors that may cause volatility in our share price include:

Contents

announcements of changes in strategy, such as the announcement of our plan to wind down our international sales and marketing operations to focus on our core U.S. and Canadian markets;
announcements of technological innovations or new offerings by us or our competitors;
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital-raising activities or commitments;
additions or departures of key personnel;
actions of securities analysts who cover our company, such as publishing research or forecasts about our business (and our performance against such forecasts), changing the rating of our common stock or ceasing coverage of our company;
investor sentiment with respect to our competitors, business partners and industry in general;
reporting on our business by the financial media, including television, radio and press reports and blogs;
fluctuations in the value of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;
changes in the way we measure our key metrics;
sales of our common stock;
changes in laws or regulations applicable to our solutions;
share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares; and
general economic and market conditions such as recessions or interest rate changes.

29



  • issuance of research or reports by securities analysts;
  • fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;
  • sales of our Class A or Class B common stock;
  • changes in laws or regulations applicable to our solutions;
  • share price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels of our shares; and
  • general economic and market conditions.

Furthermore, the stock markets have recently have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively impact the market price of our Class A common stock. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. For example, in August 2014, we and certain of our officers were sued in two similar putative class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements. We may be the target of additional litigation of this type of litigation in the future.future as well. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s time and attention from other business concerns, which could harm our business.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future, and as a result, yourour stockholders’ ability to achieve a return on yourtheir investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our Class A common stock.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our future earnings for use in the development of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their Class A common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investments.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of usour Company more difficult, limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our Class A common stock.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or changes in our management. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include provisions that:

Contents

prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors;
provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by a majority of directors then in office, even though less than a quorum; and
require the approval of our board of directors or the holders of a supermajority of our outstanding shares of capital stock to amend our bylaws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation.

30



  • require the approval of our board of directors or the holders of a supermajority of our outstanding shares of capital stock to amend our bylaws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation; and
  • reflect two classes of common stock, as discussed above.

These provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management. In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations with any “interested” stockholder for a period of three years following the date on which the stockholder became an “interested” stockholder.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.

       The trading market for our Class A common stock, to some extent, depends on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our shares or change their opinion of our shares, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline.

Future sales of our Class A common stock in the public market could cause our share price to decline.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Class A common stock in the public market, particularly sales by our directors, officers, and employees and significant stockholders, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our Class A common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had 59,163,13479,429,833 shares of Class A common stock and 11,711,359 shares of Class B common stock outstanding. Although a public market exists for our Class A common stock only, shares of Class B common stock are generally convertible into an equivalent number of shares of Class A common stock at the option of the holder or upon transfer (subject to certain exceptions).

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members.

       We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations has increased and will continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly, and increase demand on our systems and resources. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could harm our business and operating results. Although we have hired additional employees to comply with these requirements, we may need to hire more employees in the future, which will increase our costs and expenses.

       In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed.

31



       We also expect that being a public company that is subject to these new rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors and qualified executive officers.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our principal executive offices in North America are currently located at 140 New Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California, where we lease office space pursuant to a lease agreement that expires in 2021. We also lease additional office space in Palo Alto, California; San Francisco, California; Scottsdale, Arizona andArizona; Chicago, Illinois; New York, New York,York; and currently our international offices are locatedinternationally in Dublin, Ireland,Ireland; London, England,England; and Hamburg, Germany. We believe that our properties are generally suitable to meet our needs for the foreseeable future. In addition, to the extent we require additional space in the future, we believe that it would be readily available on commercially reasonable terms.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

In February and March 2010, we were sued inAugust 2014, two putative class actions on behalfaction lawsuits alleging violations of local businesses asserting various causesfederal securities laws were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of action based on claims that we manipulatedCalifornia, naming as defendants us and certain of our officers. The lawsuits allege violations of the ratingsExchange Act by us and reviews on our platform to coerce local businesses to buyofficers for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding our advertising products.business and operations between October 29, 2013 and April 3, 2014. These cases were subsequently consolidated and, in an action asserting claims for violationJanuary 2015, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint seeking unspecified monetary damages and other relief. Following the court’s dismissal of the California Business & Professions Code, extortion and attempted extortion basedconsolidated complaint on April 21, 2015, the conduct they allege and seeking monetary relief in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. In October 2011,plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint on May 21, 2015. On November 24, 2015, the court dismissed this consolidated actionthe first amended complaint with prejudice.prejudice, and entered judgment in our favor on December 28, 2015. The plaintiffs have appealed this judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,Circuit.

On April 23, 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed by former Eat24 employees in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County, naming as defendants us and Eat24. The lawsuit asserts that we failed to permit meal and rest periods for certain current and former employees working as Eat24 customer support specialists, and alleges violations of the California Labor Code, applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders and the California Business and Professions Code. The plaintiffs seek monetary damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. On May 29, 2015, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint asserting an additional cause of action for penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act. In January 2016, we reached a preliminary agreement to settle this matter, which heard the appealcourt preliminarily approved on July 11, 2013.June 27, 2016. The Ninth Circuit has not yet issuedsettlement received final court approval on December 5, 2016 and the $550 thousand settlement amount was paid on February 10, 2017.



Table of Contents

On June 24, 2015, a decision. Accordingly, we are currently unable to reasonably estimate either the probability of incurring a loss or an estimated range of such loss, if any, from this appeal.

       Qype, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, is party toformer Eat24 sales employee filed a lawsuit, regarding fees payable for directory data that Qypeon behalf of herself and its predecessor purchased from Deutsche Telekom AG, or Deutsche Telekom, between 2005a putative class of current and 2008 at a rate set by the German Federal Network Agency, or FNA. Following German court decisions overturning the rate set by the FNA, Deutsche Telekom sued Qypeformer Eat24 sales employees, against Eat24 in the RegionalSuperior Court of BonnCalifornia for San Francisco County. The lawsuit alleges that Eat24 failed to pay required wages, including overtime wages, allow meal and rest periods and maintain proper records, and asserts causes of action under the California Labor Code, applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders and the California Business and Professions Code. The plaintiff seeks monetary damages and penalties in unspecified amounts, as well as injunctive relief. On August 3, 2015, the plaintiff filed a first amended complaint asserting an additional cause of action for penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act. In January 2016, we reached a preliminary agreement to settle this matter for payments in the aggregate amount of up to approximately $0.2 million, which the court preliminarily approved on August 26, 2010 for approximately €1.5 million plus interest for additional fees for data delivered between 2005 and 2008. In August 2011, the29, 2016. The settlement received final court rejected Deutsche Telekom’s claim in full and Deutsche Telekom appealed the decision to the Higher Regional Court of Cologne, which referred the appeal to the Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf in July 2012. Following a hearing in April 2013, the Higher Regional Court denied Deutsche Telekom’s appeal, and Deutsche Telekom did not challenge this decision. In August 2013, Deutsche Telekom filed a claim against Qype in the Regional Court of Cologne seeking approximately €441,900 in additional data service fees, plus interest, for data delivered in 2009, which it subsequently withdrew in November 2013.approval on February 1, 2017.

In addition, we are subject to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the resultsof litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently do not believe that the final outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations orcash flows.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

32




Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our Class A common stock, par value $0.000001 per share, has beenis listed on the New York Stock Exchange LLC, or NYSE, under the symbol “YELP” since March 2, 2012.“YELP.” We previously had two classes of common stock outstanding — Class A common stock and Class B common stock — which converted into a single class of common stock on September 22, 2016. Prior to thatsuch date, there was no public trading market for our Class A common stock, par value $0.000001 per share, was listed on the NYSE under the same symbol as our common stock. There iswas no public trading market for our Class B common stock. stock, par value $0.000001 per share.

The following table sets forth on a per shareper-share basis the high and low intraday sales prices of (i) our Class A common stock through September 22, 2016 and (ii) our common stock thereafter, in each case as reported by the NYSE for the periods indicated:presented:

2013201220162015
     High     Low     High     Low     High     Low     High     Low
First Quarter(1)$     25.46$     19.13$     31.96$     19.36$     28.55$     14.53$     57.70$     42.10
Second Quarter $36.14 $22.48 $28.40$14.10$30.54$19.21$52.51$37.91
Third Quarter$71.50$33.93$28.93 $17.50$41.94$28.68$43.49$20.50
Fourth Quarter$75.37$56.65$29.48$16.32$43.36$32.00$32.47$20.60

(1)The period reported for the first quarter of 2012 is from March 2, 2012 through March 31, 2012.

On February 24, 2014,23, 2017, the last reported sale price of our Class A common stock was $94.67.$33.47.

Stockholders

As of the close of business on February 24, 2014,23, 2017, there were 6751 stockholders of record of our Class A common stock and 30 stockholders of record of our Class B common stock. The actual number of stockholdersholders of our common stock is greater than this number of record holders, and includes stockholders who are beneficial owners, but whose shares are held in street name by brokers andor other nominees. This number of holders of record also does not include stockholders whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid, and do not anticipate declaring or paying, any cash dividends on our capital stock. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on then existingthen-existing conditions, including our financial condition, operating results, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

Performance Graph

We have presented below the cumulative total return to our stockholders during the period from March 2, 2012 (the date our Class A common stock commenced trading on the NYSE) through December 31, 20132016 in comparison to the NYSE Composite Index and NYSE Arca Tech 100 Index. All values assume a $100 initial investment and data for the NYSE Composite Index and NYSE Arca Tech 100 Index assume reinvestment of dividends. The comparisons are based on historical data and are not indicative of, nor intended to forecast, the future performance of our Class A common stock.

33




Table of Contents

Index    3/2/2012    3/31/2012    6/30/2012    9/30/2012    12/31/2012    3/31/2013    6/30/2013    9/30/2013    12/31/2013
Yelp Inc. 100 179.27 151.53 180.33 125.67 158.07 231.80441.20459.67
NYSE Composite Index100101.1896.52102.91105.63 112.28 112.35 118.62 128.22
NYSE Arca Tech 100 
Index100104.5397.23103.22103.53114.19115.53125.95138.98

Period
Index    3/2/2012    12/31/2012    12/31/2013    12/31/2014    12/31/2015    12/31/2016
Yelp Inc.100 126460365192254
NYSE Composite Index100106128134125136
NYSE Arca Tech 100 Index100104139159156173

The information under “Performance Graph” is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C,, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and is notnot to be incorporated by reference in any filing of Yelp underunder the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after thethe date of this Annual Report and irrespective of any generalgeneral incorporation language in those filings.

Use of Proceeds from Public Offering of Common Stock

On March 2, 2012, we closed our initial public offering, in which we sold 8,172,500 shares of Class A common stock at a price to the public of $15.00 per share. The aggregate offering price for shares sold in the offering was approximately $122.6 million. The offer and sale of all of the shares in the initial public offering were registered under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-178030), which was declared effective by the SEC on February 16, 2012. Goldman, Sachs & Co. acted as the lead bookrunning manager and representative of the underwriters for the initialpublic offering. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Jefferies & Company, Inc. acted as joint bookrunning managers and Allen & Company LLC and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. acted as co-managers for the initial public offering.

Our use of proceeds to date has been as described in our final prospectus, or the Prospectus, filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act on March 2, 2012, and has included the approximately $24.3 million cash portion of the purchase price of Qype and approximately $2.2 million for the cash portion of the purchase price of SeatMe. There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our initial public offering as described in the Prospectus. We have invested the funds received that have not yet been utilized in registered money market funds.



Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The table below provides information with respect to repurchases ofNo shares of our Class B common stock. [No shares of our Class A common stock were repurchased during this period.the three months ended December 31, 2016.

TotalMaximum
Number ofNumber of
SharesShares that
Purchased asMay Yet
Part ofBe
TotalWeightedPubliclyPurchased
Number ofAverageAnnouncedUnder the
SharesPrice PaidPlans orPlans or
Period     Purchased     per Share     Programs     Programs
October 1 – October 31, 2013  
November 1 – November 30, 2013(1)4,994 $     62.38
December 1 – December 31, 2013(2)205$68.30
Total5,199$62.61

(1)Represents shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of employee restricted stock awards under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.
(2)Represents shares released from escrow to the Company in connection with a post-closing adjustments to the purchase price of SeatMe based on its net working capital as of the acquisition date.

35



Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data.

The following selected consolidated financial and other data should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, as well as the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, are derived from audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Annual Report. We have included, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information set forth in those statements. The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, as well as the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, are derived from audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this Annual Report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any period in the future.

Year Ended December 31,
20132012201120102009
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenue$    232,988     $    137,567     $    83,285     $    47,731     $    25,808
Costs and expenses:
              Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
                     shown separately below)16,5619,9285,9313,1371,121
              Sales and marketing131,97085,91554,53933,91917,979
              Product development38,24320,47311,5866,5603,243
              General and administrative42,90731,53117,23411,2874,597
              Depreciation and amortization11,4557,2234,2382,3341,201
              Restructuring and integration6751,262
              Contribution to The Yelp Foundation5,928
Total costs and expenses241,811156,33299,45657,23728,141
Loss from operations(8,823)(18,765)(16,171)(9,506)(2,333)
Other income (expense), net(407)(226)(395)1533
              Loss before income taxes(9,230)(18,991)(16,566)(9,491)(2,300)
Provision for income taxes(838)(122)(102)(75)(8)
Net loss(10,068)(19,113)(16,668)(9,566)(2,308)
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock(32)(189)(175)(32)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B)$(10,068)$(19,145)$(16,857)$(9,741)$(2,340)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (Class A    
       and B):
              Basic$(0.15)$(0.35)$(1.10)$(0.71)$(0.19)
              Diluted$(0.15)$(0.35)$(1.10) $(0.71)$(0.19)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net loss per share 
       attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B):
              Basic65,66554,14915,29113,774  12,344
              Diluted65,66554,14915,29113,77412,344
Other Financial and Operational Data:   
              Reviews(1)52,75735,95924,81715,1158,834
              Unique Visitors(2)120,00586,308 65,79639,35626,077
              Claimed Local Business Locations(3)1,488994606307120
              Active Local Business Accounts(4)674024117
              Adjusted EBITDA(5)$29,429$4,598$(1,128)$(5,741)$(575)


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

Year Ended December 31,
     2016     2015     2014     2013     2012
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net revenue$     713,069$     549,711$     377,536$     232,988$     137,567
Costs and expenses:
       Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
       separately below)(1)60,36351,01524,38216,5619,928
       Sales and marketing(1)382,854301,764201,050131,97085,915
       Product development(1)138,549107,78665,18138,24320,473
       General and administrative(1) 97,48180,86658,27442,90731,531
       Depreciation and amortization(1)35,34629,60417,59011,4557,223
       Restructuring and integration(1)3,455-6751,262
Total costs and expenses718,048571,035366,477241,811156,332
Income (Loss) from operations(4,979)(21,324)11,059(8,823)(18,765)
Other income (expense), net1,694386221(407)(226)
Income (Loss) before income taxes(3,285)(20,938)11,280(9,230)(18,991)
Benefit from (Provision for) income taxes(1,385)(11,962)25,193(838)(122)
Net income (loss)(4,670)(32,900)36,473(10,068)(19,113)
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock----(32)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B)$(4,670)$(32,900)$36,473$(10,068)$     (19,145)
 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B):
       Basic$(0.06)$(0.44)$0.51$(0.15)$     (0.35)
       Diluted$(0.06)$(0.44)$0.48$(0.15)$     (0.35)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share attributable
to common stockholders (Class A and B):
       Basic77,18674,68371,93665,66554,149
       Diluted77,18674,68376,71265,66554,149

(1)

Stock-based compensation expense included in the statements of operations data above was as follows:


Year Ended December 31,
     2016     2015     2014     2013     2012
(in thousands)
Cost of revenue$      2,446$      1,117$      729$      421$      122
Sales and marketing27,09821,96215,08310,1314,917
Product development36,32323,431 14,8046,2701,705
General and administrative20,39414,33211,6579,3008,134
Restructuring and integration---555-
Total stock-based compensation$86,261$60,842$42,273$26,677$14,878



Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

As of December 31,
     2016     2015     2014     2013     2012
(dollars in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents$       272,201$       171,613$       247,312$       389,764$95,124
Property, equipment and software, net92,44080,46762,76130,66614,799
Working capital(1)500,780393,505386,785391,84491,218
Total assets885,206755,427629,650515,977187,696
Total stockholders’ equity807,186693,620588,150486,483       165,662

(1)     Working capital comprises of total current assets less total current liabilities

Other Financial and Operational Data:

Year Ended December 31,
     2016     2015     2014     2013     2012
(in thousands)
Reviews(1)121,02295,21071,23252,75735,959
Desktop Unique Visitors(2)73,46674,60777,62877,71362,336
Mobile Web Unique Visitors(3)65,35165,86057,77042,29223,972
App Unique Devices(4)24,07320,00614,54110,6139,178
Claimed Local Business Locations(5)3,3632,6482,0291,488994
Advertising and Subscription Accounts(6)138111845431
Adjusted EBITDA(7)$     120,083$     69,122$     70,922$     29,429$     4,598

(1)     Represents the cumulative number of reviews submitted to Yelp since inception, as of the period end, including reviews that were not recommended or that had been removed from our platform. We define a review as each individually written assessment submitted by a user who has registered by creating a public profile on our platform. For more information, including information regarding reviews that are not recommended and removed reviews, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics—Reviews.”

36



(2)Represents the average number of monthlydesktop unique visitors for the last three months of the period. We define monthly unique visitorsperiod, calculated as the total number of unique visitors“users,” as measured by Google Analytics, who have visited our non-mobile optimized website at least once in a given month, and we average the number of monthly unique visitors in each month ofaveraged over the three-month period to calculate average monthly unique visitors.period. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics—Unique VisitorsTraffic.”
(3)Represents the average number of mobile website unique visitors for the last three months of the period, calculated as the number of “users,” as measured by Google Analytics, who visited our mobile-optimized website at least once in a given month, averaged over the three-month period. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics—Traffic.”
(3)(4)Represents the average number of unique mobile devices using our mobile app for the last three months of the period, calculated as the number of unique mobile devices that used our mobile app in a given month, averaged over the three month period. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics—Traffic.
(5)Represents the cumulative number of business locations that havehad been claimed on Yelp worldwide since 2008, as of the period end. We define a claimed local business location as each business address for which a business representative visitshas visited our website and claimsclaimed the free business listing page for the business located at that address. For more information, seeManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics—Claimed Local Business Locations.”
(4)(6)Represents the number of active local business accounts from which we recognized advertising and subscription revenue during the last three months of the period. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Metrics—Active Local BusinessAdvertising and Subscription Accounts.”


Table of Contents

(5)(7)     We define adjustedAdjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate as net income (loss), adjusted to exclude: provision (benefit) for income taxes, other income (expense), net, interest income, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, and restructuring and integration costs,costs. We believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors for understanding and contributionevaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and our board of directors. This non-GAAP information is not necessarily comparable to The Yelp Foundation. See “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Adjusted EBITDAnon-GAAP information of other companies, and should not be viewed as a substitute for, or superior to, net income (loss) prepared in accordance with GAAP as a measure of our profitability. Users of this financial information should consider the types of events and transactions for which adjustments have been made. For more information and forabout adjusted EBITDA, as well as a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDAthis non-GAAP financial measure to net income (loss), the most directly comparable financial measure calculatedseeManagement’s Discussion and presented in accordance with GAAP.Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Adjusted EBITDA.

       Stock-based compensation included in the statements of operations data above was as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
2013    2012    2011    2010     2009 
(in thousands)
Cost of revenue$    421$    122$    50$    26$    
Sales and marketing10,1314,9171,607662221
Product development6,2701,705721260179
General and administrative9,3008,1342,499483157
Restructuring and integration555
Total stock-based compensation$26,677$14,878$4,877$1,431$557
 
As of December 31,
201320122011 2010 2009 
(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents$389,764$95,124$21,736$27,074$15,074 
Property, equipment and software, net30,66614,7999,8815,2562,184
Working capital 391,844 91,218  18,996 28,741 15,092
Total assets515,977 187,69643,82141,015 20,817
Redeemable convertible preferred stock55,435 55,24630,877
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)486,483165,662(24,347)(20,889)(13,169)

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Adjusted EBITDA

       To provide investors with additional information regarding our financial results, we have disclosed in the table above and elsewhere in this Annual Report adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. We have provided a reconciliation below of adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

       We have included adjusted EBITDA because it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget and to develop short- and long-term operational plans. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating adjusted EBITDA can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our core business. Accordingly, we believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors.

37



    Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:

  • although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;
  • adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
  • adjusted EBITDA does not consider the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based compensation;
  • adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us;
  • adjusted EBITDA does not consider any dilutive impact of our contribution to The Yelp Foundation;
  • adjusted EBITDA does not take into account any restructuring and integration costs associated with our acquisition of Qype; and
  • other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate adjusted EBITDA differently, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.

    Because of these limitations, you should consider adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and our other GAAP results. The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net loss for each of the periods indicated:

     Year Ended December 31,
2013     2012     2011     2010     2009
(in thousands)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA:
Net loss$     (10,068)$     (19,113)$     (16,668)$     (9,566)$     (2,308)
Provision for income taxes838122102758
Other income (expense), net407226395(15)(33)
Depreciation and amortization11,4557,2234,2382,3341,201
Stock-based compensation26,12214,8784,8771,431557
Restructuring and integration(1)6751,262
Contribution to The Yelp Foundation5,928
       Adjusted EBITDA$29,429$4,598$(1,128)$(5,741)$(575)

(1)Restructuring and integration includes $0.6 million in stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs, and involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of several factors, including those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” included under Part I, Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Annual Report.

Overview

Yelp connects people with great local businesses. Our users have contributed a total of approximately 52.8 million cumulative reviews of almost every type of local business, from restaurants, boutiques and salons to dentists, mechanics, plumbers and more. These reviews are writtenbusinesses by people using Yelp to share their everyday local business experiences, giving voice to consumers and bringing “word of mouth” online. The information these reviews provide is valuableonline and providing a platform for businesses and consumers to engage and transact. Our platform provides value to consumers and businesses alike. Approximately 120.0 million unique visitors used our website according to Google Analytics, and our mobile application was used on approximately 10.6 million unique mobile devices on a monthly average basis during the quarter ended December 31, 2013. Businesses of all sizes use our platform to engagealike by connecting consumers with consumersgreat local businesses at the critical moment when they are deciding where to spend their money. Our business revolves around three key constituencies: the communitiesEach day, millions of contributors who write reviews, the consumers who read themuse our platform to find and theinteract with local businesses, that they describe.

38



    We provide businesses of all sizes with bothwhich in turn use our free and paid services to connecthelp them engage with our large audienceconsumers. The Yelp Platform, which allows consumers and businesses to transact directly on Yelp, provides consumers with a continuous experience from discovery to completion of consumers. Our free services include a business owner’s account that allowstransactions and local merchants to update business listing information and respond to reviews in real time. businesses with an additional point of consumer engagement.

We generatederive substantially all of our revenue from our paid services to businesses, which include enhanced business listings, search advertising solutions, Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates, as well as the sale of brand advertising. Manyadvertising products. In the year ended December 31, 2016, our net revenue was $713.1 million, which represented an increase of 30% from the year ended December 31, 2015, and we recorded a net loss of $4.7 million and adjusted EBITDA of $120.1 million. In the year ended December 31, 2015, our active local business accounts pay us onnet revenue was $549.7 million, which represented an increase of 46% from the year ended December 31, 2014, and we recorded a monthly basis, primarily by credit card.net loss of $32.9 million and adjusted EBITDA of $69.1 million.

Our Growth Strategy.Our success is primarily the result of significant investment in our communities, employees, content, brand and technology. We believe that continued investment in our business provides our largest opportunity for future growth. Accordingly, we have determined to forgo the achievement of near-term profitability in return for long-term growth as we invest in our key growth strategies: growing our existing markets, expanding into new geographic markets, expanding our platform and enhancing monetization.

    We expect to invest in features aimed at both attracting more, and increasing the usage of, users and businesses as we look to leverage our brand and benefit from accelerating network effect dynamics in our existing markets. We believe that by expanding the number of reviews on our platform, we will attract new consumers and increase the number of visits and searches per user. To this end, in October 2012, we acquired Qype, a Germany-based reviews website, to accelerate the expansion of our international footprint in Europe. We completed the migration of Qype content to our platform in the fourth quarter of 2013, substantially increasing our combined presence in European markets. We will continue to focus on user engagement by exploring new ways to enable contributors to share content and to ensure the authenticity of our content. We will also continue expanding our platform and business owner tools to encourage businesses to advertise on our platform.

    We also plan to continue investing in additional domestic and international markets; as we do so, we believe that we will follow a similar pattern of investment preceding revenue growth. As of December 31, 2013, we are active in 61 Yelp markets in the United States and 56 Yelp markets internationally. This footprint represents a small portion of the potential domestic and international markets that we are currently targeting for expansion. While many of the potential new domestic markets are smaller than our current markets, we are targeting a mix of both large and small markets internationally. The table below summarizes the expansion of our business since 2008:

     2008     2009     2010     2011     2012     2013
Cumulative Yelp Markets(1)2027497197117
New Yelp Markets(1)6722222620
Yelp Markets(1)PhiladelphiaSacramento Raleigh-DurhamMilwaukeeRichmondCharleston
(United States)DenverHonoluluKansas CityPittsburghOklahoma CityBaton Rouge
MinneapolisSt. LouisLas VegasTampa BayHampton RoadsTulsa
DallasOrlandoSan AntonioLouisvilleBirminghamReno
Miami ColumbusBaltimoreMadisonOmaha
DetroitIndianapolis Memphis AlbuquerquePortland(M)
CharlotteHartfordJacksonvilleRochester
   CincinnatiBuffaloDes Moines
Tucson
 Nashville
New Orleans
Cleveland
Salt Lake City
Providence
Yelp Markets(1)LondonDublinAmsterdamAntwerpIstanbul
(International)TorontoLeedsHalifaxBrusselsKrakow
VancouverParisEdinburghBrisbaneAuckland
BerlinViennaFlorenceRotterdam
GlasgowHamburgLilleToulouse
ManchesterLyonPerthNaples
CalgaryMadridSevilleBordeaux
EdmontonMunichSydneySão Paulo
MarseilleAdelaidePrague
MontrealCopenhagenRio de Janeiro
RomeOsloFrankfurt
BarcelonaOttawaDüsseldorf
MilanStockholm
MelbourneValencia
Helsinki
Birmingham
Singapore
Zurich
Metrics (in thousands):
Reviews(2)4,6898,83415,11524,81735,95952,757
Unique Visitors(3)15,73626,07739,35665,79686,308120,005
Claimed Business Locations(4)251203076069941,488
Active Local Business Accounts(5)4711244067

39



(1)A Yelp Market is defined as a city or region where we have hired a Community Manager. Cumulative Yelp Markets represents the cumulative number of Yelp Markets as of the end of each of the years in the period from 2008 through 2013.
(2)Represents the cumulative number of reviews submitted to Yelp since inception, as of the end of each of the years in the period from 2008 through 2013, including reviews that were not recommended or that had been removed from our platform. We define a review as each individually written assessment submitted by a user who has registered by creating a public profile on our platform. For more information, including information regarding not recommended and removed reviews, see “—Key Metrics—Reviews.”
(3)Represents the average number of monthly unique visitors for the last quarter of each of the years in the period from 2008 through 2013. We define monthly unique visitors as the total number of unique visitors who have visited our website at least once in a given month according to Google Analytics, and we average the number of monthly unique visitors in each month of the three-month period to calculate average monthly unique visitors. For more information, see “—Key Metrics—Unique Visitors.”
(4)Represents the cumulative number of business locations that have been claimed on Yelp worldwide since 2008, as of the end of each of the years in the period from 2008 through 2013. For more information, see “—Key Metrics—Claimed Local Business Locations.”
(5)Represents the number of active local business accounts from which we recognized revenue during the last quarter of each of the years in the period from 2008 through 2013. For more information, see “—Key Metrics—Active Local Business Accounts.”

    We also expect to invest in product development to expand our platform by innovating and introducing new products to our website and mobile applications. We introduced our first mobile app in 2008, and, during the quarter ended December 31, 2013, our mobile app was used on approximately 10.6 million unique mobile devices on a monthly average basis. We currently deliver advertising on both our mobile website and mobile app, and plan to continue to innovate and introduce enhanced mobile solutions as mobile usage increases. In the third quarterinvest for long-term growth in our key strategies:

Network Effect.We plan to invest in marketing and product development aimed at both attracting more, and increasing the engagement of, consumers as we look to leverage our brand and benefit from network dynamics in Yelp communities. In addition to continuing our efforts to raise brand awareness, we plan to allocate a greater proportion of our advertising budget to performance advertising, with the objective of growing our communities, among other goals. We also plan to continue to invest in our mobile platform, where we find our most engaged users, and in our transaction capabilities, which we believe will driver further consumer engagement. Together with our continued focus on making our content widely available and developing innovative features, while maintaining a great user experience, we believe these investments will attract new consumers as well as increase the number of visits and searches per user.



Table of 2013, we acquired SeatMe, a web- and app-based reservation solution for restaurant and nightlife establishments that we believe will both enhance user experience and complement our existing partnership arrangements. Contents

Enhance Monetization.Our core strength is our advertising business in the United States and Canada. In the fourth quarter of 2016, we carried out a significant reduction in our sales and marketing activities outside the United States and Canada, where we believe the long-term return on continued investment to be lower than alternative opportunities for the business within our core markets. We plan to continue to invest in initiatives to enhance our opportunities in the United States and Canada, including aggressively growing our sales force in order to reach more businesses; however, we will also broaden our sales strategy by developing new and evolving sales channels, such as self-serve advertising and partnerships with marketing agencies and resellers, and deepening our relationships with existing customers. In addition, we will continue the expansion of the Yelp Platform to drive transaction volume, new business owner products and comprehensive tools to measure the effectiveness of our products, as well as our local business outreach.

We also introduced restaurant hygiene scores on Yelp business pages in certain markets and updated our “Nearby” featureexpect to provide personalized suggestions.

    While our core local advertising business in the United States has a significant and growing base of revenue, we have invested, and will continue to invest in several initiatives to enhance our monetization opportunities. One such initiative is aggressively growing our sales force, which has been selling our advertising products internationally since the third quarter of 2012. Although our revenue from international markets only represented 4.6% of our consolidated revenue in the year ended December 31, 2013, we have sales operations in London and Hamburg, and plan to continue to grow our international sales force to reach more businesses internationally. To date, almost all of our revenue, and a majority of our expenses, have been denominated in U.S. dollars. As we expand internationally, however, we expect to generate an increasing percentage of revenue, and incur an increasing percentage of our expenses, in foreign currencies.

2013 Results of Operations.In the year ended December 31, 2013, our net revenue was $233.0 million, which represented an increase of 69% from the year ended December 31, 2012, and we generated a net loss of $10.1 million and adjusted EBITDA of $29.4 million. In the year ended December 31, 2012, our net revenue was $137.6 million, which represented an increase of 65% from the year ended December 31, 2011, and we generated a net loss of $19.1 million and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $4.6 million.

Outlook. Our overall strategy is to invest for long-term growth. Accordingly, we do not expect to be profitable in the near term as we anticipate that our operating expenses will increase significantly in the foreseeable future. As outlined above, we have made significant investments in our business and expect to continue investing in marketing and product development to improve both the consumer and local business experience on our online and mobile platforms. In addition, we expect to continue to grow our sales organization both domestically and abroad.



    We also expect to invest between $10 million and $14 million in capital expenditures in 2014 as we continue2017 to growsupport the growth of our business, the majority of which we expect to useprimarily to increase our office space, upgrade our technology and infrastructure to improve the ability of our platform to handle the projected increase in usage, and enable the release of new features and solutions. As a result of this investment philosophy, we expect that our operating expenses will continue to increase for the foreseeable future.

Factors Affecting Our Performance

Traffic and User Engagement.Changes in consumer traffic, as well as the quality and quantity of contributed content, has affected and will continue to affect our revenue and financial performance. Traffic to our platform determines the number of ads we are able to show, affects the value of those ads to businesses and influences the content creation that drives further traffic; as a result, our ability to grow our business depends on our ability to increase traffic on our platform. Because we rely on Internet search engines to drive traffic to our platform, a significant portion of our traffic can be affected by a number of factors, many of which are not in our direct control. Changes in a search engine’s ranking algorithms, methodologies or design layouts may result in links to our website not being prominent enough to drive traffic to our website and mobile app.

For example, Google has previously made changes to its algorithms and methodologies that may be contributing to the slowing of our traffic growth rate, particularly in our international markets where we have less content and more competitors. We believe this headwind on our ability to achieve prominent display of our content in international unpaid search results disrupted the network effect we expected in our international markets based on what we experienced domestically, whereby increases in content led to increases in traffic. This was a contributing factor to our decision to wind down our international sales and marketing operations. Google also announced that, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, the rankings of sites showing certain types of app install interstitials could be penalized on its mobile search results pages. While we believe the type of interstitial we currently use will not be penalized, the parameters of Google’s policy may change from time to time, be poorly defined and be inconsistently interpreted. For example, in January 2017, Google broadened the categories of interstitials that may be penalized. As a result, Google may unexpectedly penalize our app install interstitials, which may cause links to our mobile website to be featured less prominently in Google’s mobile search results page, and traffic to both our mobile website and mobile app may be harmed as a result. We cannot predict the long-term impact of these changes.

We also anticipate that our traffic growth will continue to slow over time, and potentially decrease in certain periods, as our business matures and we achieve higher penetration rates. As our traffic growth rate slows, our success will become increasingly dependent on our ability to increase levels of user engagement on our platform. This dependence may increase as the portion of our revenue derived from performance-based advertising increases. If user engagement decreases, our advertisers may stop or reduce the amount of advertising on our platform and our results of operations would be harmed. In addition, we also expect the cyclicality and seasonality in our business to become more pronounced as our growth rate slows, including weaker traffic in the fourth quarter of the year.



Table of Contents

Increasing Mobile Usage.The number of people who access information about local businesses through mobile devices has increased dramatically over the past few years and is expected to continue to increase. Although many consumers access our platform both on their mobile devices and through personal computers, we have seen substantial growth in mobile usage. We anticipate that growth in use of our mobile platform will be the driver of our growth for the foreseeable future and that usage through personal computers will continue to decline worldwide. While we currently deliver advertising on our mobile platform, the mobile market remains a new and evolving market with which we have limited experience. Our continued success depends on, among other things, our efforts to innovate and introduce enhanced mobile products and features. If our efforts to develop compelling mobile advertising products are not successful, advertisers may stop or reduce their advertising with us. At the same time, we must balance advertiser demands against our commitment to prioritizing the quality of user experience over short-term monetization. If we are not able to balance these competing considerations successfully, we may not be able to generate meaningful revenue from our mobile products despite the expected growth in mobile usage, which would adversely impact our financial performance.

Ability to Attract and Retain Local BusinessesAdvertisers.. Our revenue growth is driven by our ability to acquireattract and retain local business advertisers that purchase our advertising solutions.products. Our largest sales and marketing expenses consist of the costs associated with acquiring local business advertisers. We spent a majority of our $132.0 million sales and marketing expense for 20132016 on initiatives relatingrelated to local business advertiser acquisition and expect to continue to expend significant amounts to attract additional local business advertisers. FailureAt the same time, our advertising agreements increasingly provide for performance-based cost-per-click payment terms, which may make it more difficult to effectively attractforecast advertising revenue accurately. In addition, our advertisers typically do not have long-term obligations to purchase our products, and retain paying local business advertiserstheir decisions to renew depend on the degree of satisfaction with our products as well as a number of factors that are outside of our control, including their ability to continue their operations and spending levels. The small and medium-sized businesses on which we heavily rely often have limited advertising budgets and may be disproportionately affected by economic downturns. As a result, a worsening economic outlook would likely cause businesses to decrease investments in advertising, which could adversely affect our revenue and operating results.revenue.

MarketInvestment in Growth.We have invested aggressively in the growth of our platform and intend to continue to invest to support this growth as we expand the Yelp Platform, grow our communities and local business base, hire additional employees and further develop our technology. We also plan to invest in product development as we continue to innovate and introduce new advertising and e-commerce products, explore new platforms and distribution channels and develop partner arrangements that provide incremental value to our advertisers and business partners to encourage them to increase their advertising budgets allocated to our platform. We expect that these investments will increase our operating expenses, and that any increase in revenue resulting from product innovations will likely trail the increase in expenses. For example, in 2015, we launched our first television and digital advertising campaign to increase consumer awareness of our brand; while we believe these marketing efforts will increase traffic in the longer term, we do not expect the effect to be immediate. We plan to continue investing in various advertising channels in 2017.

Community Development.Our long-term growth depends on our ability to successfully develop new and existing domestic and international markets. We expanded into 20 new markets during 2013, increasing our total market reach to 117 domestic and international markets.Yelp communities. It can take years for our platform to achieve a critical mass of consumers and reviews to drive meaningful traction of our advertising solutionsproducts and to begin to generategenerating revenue in a particular market.community. As a result, we may continue to generate losses in new marketscommunities for an extended period, and different marketscommunities can be expected to grow at different rates and generate varying levels of revenue. As with most businesses, we expect our revenue growth to slow as our business matures over time. Local advertisingAdvertising revenue for ourthe oldest cohort of U.S. markets,Yelp communities in the United States, which launched in 2005-2006, grew at a 53% year-over-year rate for the year ended December 31, 2013,30% in 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.2015. This rate is lower than the growth rate of local advertising revenue for the 2007-2008 cohort, which grew at 73% in the same period, and the 2009-2010 cohort, which grew at 102% in37% over the same period. We believe this is indicative of continued revenue growth, but slowing revenue growth for more mature markets.older communities.

    We opened a sales office in London in the third quarter of 2012 and expanded our European sales operations through our acquisition of Qype and its established European sales force inIn the fourth quarter of 2012. We plan to continue to grow2016, we wound down our international sales forceand marketing operations, including our international community management team, and reallocated the associated resources primarily to reach more businesses internationally, including throughour U.S. and Canadian markets. As a new sales office in Dublin, Ireland, which we expect to open in 2014.

Increasing Mobile Usage.Although we currently deliver advertisingresult, our continued growth depends on our mobile app and mobile website, we have limited experience with mobile advertising and have prioritized the quality of user experience with our mobile products over short-term monetization. The increasing use of our platform on mobile devices may also affect our performance, particularly if mobile use substitutes for use of our website on personal computers. While we believe use of our mobile app and mobile website are complementaryability to the use of our website, if mobile device usage is substituting for, rather than incremental to, usage of our website on personal computers and our mobile advertising solutions prove ineffective, this trend could adversely impact our business.

Investment in Growth.We have invested aggressively in the growth of our platform and intend to continue to invest to support this growth as we expand our platform, grow our contributor and local business base, hire additional employees and further develop our technology. We also planU.S. and Canadian communities and operations. However, we have already entered many of the largest cities in the United States and Canada, and launching additional communities may not yield results similar to invest in product development asthose of our existing communities. As a result, we continue to innovate and introduce new products for our website and mobile app, explore new platforms and distribution channels and grow and develop advertising and e-commerce products and partner arrangementsbelieve that provide incremental value to our advertisers and business partners to encourage them to increase their advertising budgets allocated towards our platform. We expect that these investments will increase our operating expenses, and that any increase in revenue resulting from product innovations will likely trail the increase in expenses.

User Engagement. Changes in user engagement, as reflected in consumer traffic and the quality and quantity of contributed content, will also affect our revenue and financial performance. As more people use our platform, more of them write reviews, add photos, tips and other content. Each review, photo or tip that a user contributes helps expand the breadth and depth of the content on our platform, drawing in more consumers and more prospective contributors. This virtuous cycle, which increases consumer traffic and content, improves our value proposition to local businesses as they seek low-cost, easy-to-use and effective advertising solutions to target a large number of intent-driven consumers. Accordingly, increased user engagement will enhance the usefulnessdevelopment of our platformexisting communities currently provides the greatest opportunity for usersgrowth, and local businesses alike, benefitingplan to focus our businesscommunity development efforts on existing communities in the long term. If user engagement decreases and traffic to our website and on our mobile app decline as a result, our advertisers may stop or reduce the amount of advertising on our platform and our business could be harmed.2017.



Table of Contents

Acquisitions.As part of our business strategy, we may determine to expand our product offerings and grow our business through the acquisition of complementary businesses or technologies. For example, in October 2012,February 2017, we acquired Qype to accelerate our international expansionNowait, a restaurant technology company with the industry’s leading waitlist system and seating tool. This will help drive Yelp’s daily engagement in July 2013, we acquired SeatMe to obtain an online reservation solution.the key restaurant vertical. Our acquisitions will affect our future financial results due to factors such as the amortization of acquired intangible assets and may also result in potential charges such as restructuring costs or impairment expense.assets.

Impact of Economic Conditions on Local Businesses.We generate a significant portion of our revenue from local businesses advertising on Yelp. Many local businesses have limited financial resources, making them more vulnerable to weak economic conditions. A worsening economic outlook would likely cause businesses to decrease investments in advertising, which would adversely affect our revenue.

How We Generate Revenue

    We generate revenue from local advertising, brand advertising and other services, which includes Yelp Deals, Gift Certificates and partner arrangements. The following table provides a breakdown of our net revenue for the periods indicated.

Year Ended December 31,
201320122011
(dollars in thousands)
Net revenue by product:               
       Local advertising$     192,983$     109,159$     58,473
       Brand advertising27,96020,57917,686
       Other services12,0457,8297,126
              Total$232,988$137,567$83,285
 
Percentage of total net revenue by product:
       Local advertising83%79%70%
       Brand advertising121521
       Other services569
              Total100%100%100%

Local Advertising. We generate revenue from local advertising programs, including enhanced profile pages and performance and impression-based advertising in search results and elsewhere on our website and our mobile app.

Brand Advertising. We generate revenue from brand advertising through the sale of advertising solutions for national brands that want to improve their local presence in the form of display advertisements and brand sponsorships. Our national advertisers include leading brands in the automobile, financial services, logistics, consumer goods and health and fitness industries.

Other Services.We generate other revenue through partner arrangements, the sale of Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates, and monetization of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks. Our revenue-sharing partner arrangements provide consumers with the ability to complete food delivery transactions through Eat24 and delivery.com and make online reservations through our SeatMe feature and OpenTable directly on Yelp. Yelp Deals allow merchants to promote themselves and offer discounted goods and services on a real-time basis to consumers directly on our website and mobile app. We earn a fee on Yelp Deals for acting as an agent in these transactions, which we record on a net basis and include in revenue upon a consumer’s purchase of the deal. Gift Certificates allow merchants to sell full-priced gift certificates directly to customers through their business profile page. We earn a fee based on the amount of the Gift Certificate sold, which we record on a net basis and include in revenue upon a consumer’s purchase of the Gift Certificate.

42



Key Metrics

We regularly review a number of metrics, including the following key metrics, to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends in our business, prepare financial projections and make strategic decisions. Unless otherwise stated, these metrics do not include metrics for Yelp Eat24 or Yelp Reservations, or from our business owner products.

Reviews.Reviews

Number of reviews represents the cumulative number of reviews submitted to Yelp since inception, as of the period end, including reviews that arewere not recommended or that havehad been removed from our platform. In addition to the text of the review, each review includes a rating of one to five stars. We include reviews that are not recommended and that have been removed because all of them are either currently accessible on our platform or were accessible at some point in time, providing information that may be useful forto users to evaluate businesses and individual reviewers. Because our automated recommendation software continually reassesses which reviews to recommend based on new information that becomes available, the “recommended” or “not recommended” status of reviews may change over time. Reviews that are not recommended or that have been removed do not factor into a business’s overall star rating. By clicking on a link on a reviewed business’s page on our website, users can access the reviews that are not currently recommended for the business, as well as the star rating and other information about reviews that wewere removed for violation of our terms of service.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, approximately 49.1112.6 million reviews were available on business profilelisting pages, including approximately 12.626.9 million reviews that were not recommended, after accounting for 3.78.4 million reviews that had been removed from our platform, either by us for violation of our terms of service or by the users who contributed them.

     As of December 31,
2013     20122011
(in thousands)
Reviews52,75735,959     24,817

    From December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013, The following table presents the cumulative number of cumulative reviews (including reviews not recommended and removed) contributedas of the dates indicated:

As of December 31,
     2016    2015    2014
 (in thousands)
Reviews121,02295,21071,232

Traffic

Traffic to Yelp increased by 47% from approximately 36.0 million to 52.8 million, and from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012, the cumulative number of reviews (including reviews not recommended and removed) contributed to Yelp increased by 45% from approximately 24.8 million to 36.0 million. This increase in reviews is a key driver of our platform’s value proposition to consumers seeking information on local business and to local businesses seeking to engage consumers. Growth in reviews also provides us with the benefit of a network effect that attracts more consumers, contributors and local businesses. As we expand internationally, growth in reviews will depend, in part, on our ability to include additional languages on our website and mobile app has three components: visitors to our non-mobile optimized website (our “desktop website”), visitors to our mobile-optimized website (our “mobile website”) and mobile devices accessing our mobile app. We use the following metrics to measure each of these traffic streams:

Desktop and Mobile Website Unique Visitors.Unique visitors represent the average number of monthly unique visitors over a given three-month period. We define monthlycalculate desktop unique visitors as the total number of unique visitors“users,” as measured by Google Analytics, who have visited our desktop website at least once in a given month, andaveraged over a given three-month period. Similarly, we averagecalculate mobile website unique visitors as the number of monthly unique visitors in each month of a given three-month period to calculate average monthly unique visitors. We track unique visitors based on the number of visitors with unique cookies“users” who have visited our mobile website using eitherat least once in a computer or mobile browser, as measured by given month, averaged over a given three-month period.

Google Analytics, a product from Google Inc. that provides digital marketing intelligence. Unique visitors do not include visitors who access our platform solely through our mobile app.intelligence, measures “users” based on unique cookie identifiers. Because the numbernumbers of desktop unique visitors isand mobile website unique visitors are therefore based on visitors with unique cookies, an individual who accesses our desktop website or mobile website from multiple devices with different cookies may be counted as multiple desktop unique visitors or mobile website unique visitors, as applicable, and multiple individuals who access our desktop website or mobile website from a shared device with a single cookie may be counted as a single desktop unique visitor or mobile website unique visitor.

43




Three months ended December 31,
2013     2012     2011
(in thousands)
Unique Visitors120,00586,30865,796

    From the quarter ended December 31, 2012 to the same periodTable of 2013, average monthlyContents

App Unique Devices. We calculate app unique visitors increased by 39% from approximately 86.3 million to 120.0 million, and fromdevices as the quarter ended December 31, 2011 to the same period of 2012, average monthly unique visitors increased by 31% from approximately 65.8 million to 86.3 million, reflecting an increase in brand awareness and our domestic and international expansion. Of our unique visitors in the quarter ended December 31, 2013, 65%, or approximately 77.7 million, visited our desktop website and 35%, or approximately 42.3 million, visited our mobile website. Of the unique visitors in the quarter ended December 31, 2012, 72%, or approximately 62.3 million, visited our desktop website and 28%, or approximately 24.0 million, visited our mobile website. We view unique visitors, along with mobile unique visitors (as discussed below), as a key indicator of our brand awareness among consumers and whether we are providing consumers with useful products and features, thereby increasing their usage of our platform. We believe that a higher level of usage may contribute to an increase in sales of our advertising solutions, as businesses will have access to a larger potential customer base.

Mobile Unique Visitors. Since unique visitors do not include visitors who access our platform solely through our mobile app, we also separately calculate mobile unique visitors to gauge mobile usage. We define mobile unique visitors for a given three month period to be the sum of (i) average number of monthly unique visitors who have visited our mobile website during that period (measured as described above) and (ii) unique mobile devices using our mobile app onin a monthly average basisgiven month, averaged over thata given three-month period. Under this method of calculation, an individual who accesses both our mobile website and our mobile app, or accesses either our mobile website or mobile app from multiple mobile devices will be counted as multiple mobileapp unique visitors.devices. Multiple individuals who access either our mobile website or mobile app from a shared device will be counted as a single mobileapp unique visitor.device.

    ForThe following table presents our traffic for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, approximately 42.3 million unique visitors visitedperiods indicated:

Three Months Ended December 31,
2016    2015    2014
    (in thousands)
Desktop Unique Visitors73,46674,60777,628
Mobile Web Unique Visitors65,351 65,86057,770
App Unique Devices24,07320,00614,541

We anticipate that our mobile websitetraffic will be the driver of our growth for the foreseeable future and our mobile app was used on approximately 10.6 million unique mobile devices, each on a monthly average basis. Accordingly, we had approximately 52.9 million mobile unique visitors on a monthly average basis in the quarter ended December 31, 2013. We view mobile unique visitors as a key indicator of thethat usage of our mobile solutions, which we expectdesktop website will continue to be important as users increasingly rely on their mobile devices.decline worldwide.

Claimed Local Business Locations.Locations

The number of claimed local business locations represents the cumulative number of business locations that have been claimed on Yelp worldwide since 2008, as of a given date. We define a claimed local business location as each business address for which a business representative visitshas visited our website and claimsclaimed the free business listing page for the business located at that address.

As of December 31,
2013     2012     2011
(in thousands)
Claimed Local Business Locations   1,488     994     606

    From December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013, The following table presents the number of claimed local business locations increased by 50% from approximately 994,000 to 1,488,000, and from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012, the number of claimed local business locations increased by 64% from approximately 606,000 to 994,000. We view the number ofcumulative claimed local business locations as an indicator of increased brand awareness among local businesses and an opportunity to introduce those local businesses to our advertising solutions.the dates presented:

44


As of December 31,
     2016     2015     2014
 (in thousands)
Claimed Local Business Locations      3,363      2,648      2,029

Active Local Business Accounts.Advertising and Subscription AccountsThe number of active

Advertising and subscription accounts, which we previously referred to as local businessadvertising accounts, represents the numberconsist of local business accounts from which we recognized (a) advertising revenue (excluding business accounts that purchased advertising solely through our partners) and (b) revenue from Yelp Reservations subscriptions in a given three-month period. We treat business accounts that have the same payment and/or user information as a single business account.

Three months ended December 31,
2013     2012     2011
(in thousands)
Active Local Business Accounts     67     40     24

    From the quarter ended December 31, 2012 to the quarter ended December 31, 2013,The following table presents the number of active localadvertising and subscription accounts during the periods presented:

Three Months Ended December 31,
     2016     2015     2014
 (in thousands)
Advertising and Subscription Accounts13811184



Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. However, we have also disclosed below adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income, which are non-GAAP financial measures. We have included adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income because they are key measures used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget and to develop short- and long-term operational plans. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our primary business accounts increased by 69% from approximately 39,800operations. Accordingly, we believe that adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income provide useful information to 67,200,investors and from the quarter ended December 31, 2011 to the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the number of active local business accounts increased by 68% from approximately 23,700 to 39,800. Of the approximately 67,200 total active local business accounts for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, approximately 46,900, or approximately 70%, were existing advertisers from which we recognized local advertising revenueothers in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the immediately preceding 12-month period,same manner as our management and approximately 20,300,board of directors.

Adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation or approximately 30%, were advertisers from which we did not recognize any local advertising revenue in that immediately preceding 12-month period. We view the number of active local business accounts as an indicator of the healthsubstitutes for analysis of our business, our brand awarenessresults as reported under GAAP. In particular, adjusted EBITDA and the benefit that a business ascribesnon-GAAP net income should not be viewed as substitutes for, or superior to, the consumers coming to our website or using our mobile app,net income (loss) prepared in accordance with GAAP as well as our ability to grow our market share. It also provides us with a measure of how productiveprofitability or liquidity. Some of these limitations are:

although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income do not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements;

adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income do not consider the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based compensation;

adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash available to us; and

other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income differently, which reduces their usefulness as comparative measures.

Because of these limitations, you should consider adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income alongside other financial performance measures, including various cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and our sales force isother GAAP results. The tables below present reconciliations of adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure in engaging new active local business accounts.each case, for each of the periods indicated.



Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA.EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate as net income (loss), adjusted to exclude: provision (benefit) for (benefit from) income taxes,taxes; other income (expense), net, interest income,net; depreciation and amortization,amortization; stock-based compensation expense; and restructuring and integration costs and our contribution tocosts. Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $120.1 million. The Yelp Foundation. We believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors. This non-GAAP informationfollowing is not necessarily comparable to non-GAAP information of other companies. Non-GAAP information should not be viewed as a substitute for, or superior to, net income (loss) prepared in accordance with GAAP as a measure of our profitability or liquidity. Users of this financial information should consider the types of events and transactions for which adjustments have been made. For more information about adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss):

Year Ended December 31,
     2016     2015     2014     2013     2012
(in thousands)
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP Net Income (Loss): 
Net income (loss)$    (4,670)$    (32,900)$    36,473$    (10,068)$    (19,113)
(Benefit from) Provision for income taxes1,38511,962(25,193)838122
Other (income) expense, net(1,694)(386)(221)407226
Depreciation and amortization35,34629,60417,59011,4557,223
Stock-based compensation86,26160,84242,27326,12214,878
Restructuring and integration costs(1)3,455--6751,262
Adjusted EBITDA$120,083$69,122$70,922$29,429$4,598

(1)     Restructuring and integration includes $0.6 million in stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Non-GAAP Net Income

Non-GAAP net income is a non-GAAP financial measure that we calculate as net income (loss), adjusted to exclude: stock-based compensation expense; amortization of intangibles; restructuring and integration costs; and the tax effect of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangibles, restructuring and integration costs and valuation allowance. Non-GAAP net income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $59.4 million. The following is a reconciliation of non-GAAP net income to net income (loss):

Year Ended December 31,
2016
     (in thousands)
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Net Income to GAAP Net Income (Loss): 
Net income (loss)$                               (4,670)
Stock-based compensation86,261
Amortization of intangible assets6,805
Restructuring and integration costs3,455
Tax adjustments(1)(32,411)
       Non-GAAP net income$59,440

(1)     Includes tax effects of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangibles, restructuring and integration, and valuation allowance.



Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ from those estimates.

We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with revenue recognition, website and internal-use software development costs, business combinations, income taxes and stock-based compensation expense have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies and estimates. For further information on these and our other significant accounting policies, see SelectedNote 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.  

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth our results of operations for the periods indicated as a percentage of net revenue for those periods. The period-to-period comparison of financial results is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Year Ended December 31,
201620152014
(as a percentage of net revenue)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:               
Net revenue by product:
              Advertising90%86%89%
              Transactions981
              Brand advertising-69
              Other services1-1
       Total net revenue      100%      100%      100%
Costs and expenses:
       Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)8%9%6%
       Sales and marketing555554
       Product development192017
       General and administrative141515
       Depreciation and amortization555
       Restructuring and integration cost---
Total costs and expenses10110497
Income (Loss) from operations(1)(4)3
Other income (expense), net---
Income (Loss) before income taxes(1)(4)3
Benefit from (Provision for) income taxes-(2)7
Net income (loss)(1%)(6%)10%



Table of Contents

Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and Other Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Adjusted EBITDA2014

Net Revenue

We generate revenue from our advertising products, transactions, other services and, through the end of 2015, brand advertising.

Advertising..” We generate advertising revenue from our advertising programs, which consist of enhanced listing pages and performance and impression-based advertising in search results and elsewhere on our website and mobile app. Advertising revenue also includes revenue generated from resale of our advertising products by certain partners and monetization of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks.

Transactions. We generate revenue from various transactions with consumers, including through Yelp Eat24, Platform transactions and the sale of Yelp Deals and Gift Certificates. Yelp Eat24 generates revenue through arrangements with restaurants, in which restaurants pay a commission percentage fee on orders placed through the Yelp Eat24 platform. We record revenue associated with Yelp Eat24’s transactions on a net basis. Our Platform partnerships are revenue-sharing arrangements that provide consumers with the ability to complete food delivery transactions, order flowers and book spa and salon appointments, among others, through third parties directly on Yelp. We earn a fee on our Platform partnerships for acting as an agent for these transactions, which we record on a net basis and include in revenue upon completion of a transaction. Yelp Deals allow merchants to promote themselves and offer discounted goods and services on a real-time basis to consumers directly on our website and mobile app. We earn a fee on Yelp Deals for acting as an agent in these transactions, which we record on a net basis and include in revenue upon a consumer’s purchase of a deal. Gift Certificates allow merchants to sell full-priced gift certificates directly to consumers through their business listing pages. We earn a fee based on the amount of the Gift Certificate sold, which we record on a net basis and include in revenue upon a consumer’s purchase of the Gift Certificate.  

Brand Advertising.Through the end of 2015, we generated revenue from brand advertising through the sale of display advertisements and brand sponsorships to national brands. We phased out these products to focus on our core strength of local advertising.

Other Services.We generate revenue through our Yelp Reservations product, licensing payments for access to Yelp data through our Yelp Knowledge program and other non-advertising related partnerships.



Table of Contents

The following table provides a breakdown of our net revenue for the periods indicated.

2015to2014 to
2016%2015 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
     2016     2015     2014          
(dollars in thousands)
Net revenue by product:
       Advertising$     645,241$     471,416$     335,45037%41%
       Transactions62,49543,8545,24743      736
       Brand advertising-31,01234,482     (100)(10)
       Other services5,3333,4292,3575645
              Total net revenue$713,069$549,711$377,53630%46%
Percentage of total net revenue by product:
       Advertising90%86%89%
       Transactions981
       Brand advertising-69
       Other services1-1
              Total net revenue100%100%100%

During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we focused on revenue growth related to our local advertiser customer base. Total net revenue increased $163.4 million, or 30%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $172.2 million, or 46%, in 2015 compared to 2014.

Advertising revenue increased $173.8 million, or 37%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $136.0 million, or 41% in 2015 compared to 2014. The increase in both periods was primarily due to a significant increase in the number of customers purchasing advertising plans as we expanded our sales force to reach more businesses. The growth in both periods was driven primarily by purchases of cost-per-click advertising. In both 2016 and 2015, a majority of ad clicks were delivered on mobile.

Our transactions revenue increased $18.6 million, or 43%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $38.6 million, or 736%, in 2015 compared to 2014. The increase in both periods was primarily the result of increased transactions from Yelp Eat24, which we acquired in February 2015.

As of the beginning of 2016, we no longer offer brand advertising products. As a result, we generated no brand advertising revenue in 2016, a decrease of $31.0 million from 2015. Our brand revenue decreased $3.5 million, or 10%, in 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to a decrease in the number of brand advertisers and our phase out of our brand advertising products.

Our other services revenue increased $1.9 million, or 56%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $1.1 million, or 45%, in 2015 compared to 2014. The increases in both years were primarily due to increases in revenue from Yelp Reservations.



Table of Contents

Cost of Revenue and Expenses

Cost of Revenue.Our cost of revenue consists primarily of web hosting costs and credit card processing fees, web hosting, Internet services costs andas well as salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for our infrastructure teams related to operatingthe operation of our website and mobile app. It also includes costs associated with video production for our local advertisers as well as confirmation and delivery services associated with Yelp Eat24. We expect cost of revenue to increase in 2017 at a similar rate to 2016.

2015 to2014 to
2016 %2015 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
     2016     2015     2014          
(dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue$     60,363$     51,015$     24,38218%109%
Percentage of net revenue8%9%6%

Cost of revenue increased $9.3 million, or 18%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $26.6 million, or 109%, in 2015 compared to 2014. The increases in 2016 and 2015 were primarily attributable to increases of $6.9 million and $9.1 million, respectively, in merchant fees related to credit card transactions due to growth in advertising and transactions revenue, particularly as a result of our acquisition of Eat24 in the three months ended March 31, 2015. Set up and creative design for brand advertising,costs, consisting primarily of video production costs, increased by $1.2 million and $2.4 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, due to greater demand by businesses for video on their business listing pages. External website hosting, and the salaries and related expenses of the internal personnel that support the website infrastructure increased $1.0 million and allocated facilities costs.$12.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, resulting from an increase in the number of visitors to our website and transactions completed in our website compared to the prior years, as well as increased headcount for personnel supporting the website infrastructure. In 2016, those increases were partially offset by improved pricing from key website hosting vendors achieved during 2016. Cost of revenue also increased by $0.2 million and $2.9 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, as a result of third-party food delivery related costs associated with Yelp Eat24.

Sales and Marketing.

Our sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of salaries (including employer payroll taxes), benefits, stock-based compensation, travel expense and incentive compensation expense, including stock-based compensation expense, for our sales and marketing employees. In addition, sales and marketing expenses include business and consumer acquisition marketing, community management, branding and advertising costs, as well as allocated facilities, insurance, business taxes and other supporting overhead costs. We spend almost no salesHistorically, we have focused on organic and marketing expenses to acquire traffic toviral growth driven by the community development efforts of our website or mobile app. Our Community Managers arecommunity management team, which is responsible for growing and fostering local communities, andas well as coordinating events to raise awareness of our brand. We expect our community management costsAs a result, we historically have incurred relatively low sales and marketing expenses to increase asconsumer awareness of Yelp. While community development continues to be our primary marketing strategy, we launched our first advertising campaign in 2014 and launched additional campaigns in each year since then. We plan to continue to expand to newinvesting in various advertising channels in 2017.



Table of Contents

In the fourth quarter of 2016, we significantly reduced our sales and marketing activities in markets outside of the United States and within existing markets. WeCanada.Nevertheless, we expect our sales and marketing expenses to increase both domestically and internationally as we expand our domestic and international footprint,communities, increase the number of active local businessadvertising and subscription accounts and continue to build our brand.brand in the United States and Canada. The substantial majority of these expenses will be related to hiring sales employees and Community Managers, as well as costs incurred with various third-party media outlets and sales employees.other advertising channels. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in 2017 at or slightly above the rate at which revenue increases in 2017, and to be our largest expense for the foreseeable future.

45


2015 to2014 to
2016 %2015 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
     2016     2015     2014          
(dollars in thousands)
Sales and marketing$     382,854$     301,764$     201,050     27%     50%
Percentage of net revenue55%55%54%

Sales and marketing expenses increased $81.1 million, or 27%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $100.7 million, or 50%, in 2015 compared 2014. The increases in 2016 and 2015 were primarily attributable to $48.5 million and $57.1 million, respectively, in additional salaries, benefits, travel and other related expenses resulting from increased headcount, including increases in stock-based compensation expense of $5.1 million and $6.9 million, respectively, as we expanded our sales organization to take advantage of the market opportunity created by increased recognition of the value of our advertising products and increased use of our free online business accounts. As a result of ongoing marketing campaigns, marketing and advertising costs increased by $14.8 million and $23.8 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. As a result of our increases in net revenue, our commission expenses increased by $7.8 million and $2.7 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition, we experienced increases in facilities, insurance, business taxes and other related allocations of $10.0 million and $17.1 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Product Development.

Our product development expenses primarily consist of salaries (including employer payroll taxes), various benefits, travel expense and stock-based compensation expense for our engineers, product management and information technology personnel. In addition, productProduct development expenses also include outside services and consulting, allocated facilities, insurance, business taxes and other supporting overhead costs. We believe that continued investment in features, software development tools and code modification is important to attaining our strategic objectives and, as a result, we expect product development expenseexpenses to increase for the foreseeable future.future, though at a slower rate in 2017 than in 2016.

2015 to2014 to
2016 %2015 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
     2016     2015     2014          
(dollars in thousands)
Product development$     138,549$     107,786$     65,181 29%65%
Percentage of net revenue19%20%17%

Product development expenses increased $30.8 million, or 29%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $42.6 million, or 65%, in 2015 compared to 2014. The increases in 2016 and 2015 were primarily attributable to $27.9 million and $35.2 million, respectively, in additional salaries, benefits, travel and related expenses associated with an increase in headcount, including increases in stock-based compensation expense (net of capitalized stock-based compensation expense) of $12.9 million and $8.6 million, respectively. In addition, we experienced increases in facilities, insurance, business taxes and other related allocations of $5.0 million and $5.8 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, as a result of the increases in headcount. In 2016, these increases were partially offset by a decrease in consulting costs of $2.1 million due to decreased reliance on outside consultants. In 2015, the use of outside consultants increased by $1.6 million.



Table of Contents

General and Administrative.

Our general and administrative expenses primarily consist of salaries (including employer payroll taxes), various benefits, travel expense and stock-based compensation expense for our executive, finance, user operations, legal, human resources and other administrative employees. In addition,Our general and administrative expenses also include outside consulting, legal and accounting services, andas well as facilities, insurance, business taxes and other supporting overhead costs not allocated to other departments. We expect our general and administrative expenses to increase for the foreseeable future as we continue to expand our business, but at a slower rate than revenue growth in 2017.

2015 to2014 to
2016 %2015 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
     2016     2015     2014          
(dollars in thousands)
General and administrative$     97,481$     80,866$     58,274     21%     39%
Percentage of net revenue14%15%15%

General and incuradministrative expenses increased $16.6 million, or 21%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $22.6 million, or 39%, in 2015 compared to 2014. The increases in 2016 and 2015 were primarily attributable to $12.1 million and $11.7 million, respectively, in additional salaries, benefits, travel and related expenses associated with beingan increase in headcount, including increases in stock-based compensation expense of $6.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively. We also experienced increases in facilities, insurance, business taxes and other related allocations of $1.5 million and $2.3 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively, as a publicly traded company.

Contribution to The Yelp Foundation. In November 2011, our board of directors approved the establishment of The Yelp Foundation, a non-profit organization designed to support consumers and businesses in the communities in which we operate. Contributions made to The Yelp Foundation consistresult of the issuanceincreases in headcount. Bad debt expense increased by $5.6 million and contribution$3.9 million, respectively, primarily as a result of 520,000 sharescontinued growth in advertising revenue. In 2016, these increases were partially offset by a decrease in consulting costs of our common stock in the form$2.6 million due to decreased reliance on outside consultants. In 2015, use of a charitable contribution to The Yelp Foundation during 2011. The Yelp Foundation has sold an aggregate of 75,000 shares, including 50,000outside consultants increased by $4.7 million as we invested in our initial public offering, or IPO. The Yelp Foundation currently holds 445,000 sharessystems and support for the growth of Class B common stock, representing less than 1% of our outstanding capital stock. We did not make any contributions in 2013 and we do not expect to make future contributions to The Yelp Foundation.the business.

Depreciation and Amortization.Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expenses primarily consist of depreciation on computer equipment, software, leasehold improvements, capitalized website and internal software development costs and amortization of purchased intangibles.intangible assets. We expect depreciation and amortization expenses to increase for the foreseeable future as we continue to expand our technology infrastructure.infrastructure, and at or slightly below the rate revenue increases in 2017.

2015 to2014 to
2016 %2015 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
     2016     2015     2014          
(dollars in thousands)
Depreciation and amortization$     35,346$     29,604$     17,590     19%     68%
Percentage of net revenue5%5%5%

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $5.7 million, or 19%, in 2016 compared to 2015, and $12.0 million, or 68%, in 2015 compared to 2014. These increases were primarily the result of our investments in expanding our technology infrastructure and capital assets to support our increase in headcount across the organization. Depreciation and amortization expenses related to our fixed assets and capitalized website and software development costs increased $5.5 million and $8.0 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition, amortization related to our intangibles increased by $0.2 million and $4.0 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The 2015 increase was primarily due to the intangibles acquired in the Eat24 acquisition.



Table of Contents

Restructuring and Integration

Year Ended December 31,
     2016     2015     2014
 (in thousands)
Restructuring and integration$      3,455$      $      

On November 2, 2016, we announced plans to significantly reduce sales and marketing activities in markets outside of the United States and Canada. We incurred $3.5 million in restructuring costs associated with this plan for the year ended December 31, 2016, of which $2.0 million had been paid by December 31, 2016. We expect to pay the remaining $1.5 million during the year ending December 31, 2017.

The restructuring costs primarily related to severance costs for affected employees. No goodwill, intangible assets or other long lived assets have been determined to be impaired. The restructuring plan was substantially completed by the year ending December 31, 2016, with approximately $0.2 million expected to be incurred during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Other Income, (Expense), Net.

Other income, (expense), net consists primarily of the interest income earned on our cash, and cash equivalents gains and losses on the disposal of assets,marketable securities, and foreign exchange gains and losses.

Year Ended December 31,
     2016     2015     2014
(in thousands)
Interest income, net$     1,724$     622$     375
Transaction loss on foreign exchange(175)(687)(121)
Other non-operating income (loss), net145451(33)
       Other income, net$1,694$386$221

In 2016, other income, net increased by $1.3 million, primarily driven by an increase in interest income earned on marketable investments.

In 2015, other income, net increased by $0.2 million, driven by an increase in interest income related to marketable securities. This was offset by increased foreign exchange losses, due to unfavorable foreign exchange rate movements during 2015. The increase in other non-operating income is primarily due to the release of cash in escrow relating to our acquisition of Qype GmBH, a German review site, in 2012.



Provision forTable of Contents

Benefit from (Provision for) Income Taxes. Provision for

Benefit from (provision for) income taxes consists of federal and state income taxes in the United States and income taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions, deferred income taxes reflecting the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, generation of income tax credits, and the realization of net operating loss carryforwards.

Year Ended December 31,
      2016     2015     2014
(in thousands)
Benefit from (Provision for) taxes$     (1,385)$     (11,962)$     25,193

ResultsIn 2016, we recognized tax expense of Operations

    The following tables set forth our results of operations for the periods presented as a percentage of net revenue for those periods (certain items may not foot due to rounding). The period-to-period comparison of financial results is not necessarily indicative of future results.

46



Year Ended December 31, 
2013     2012     2011
(as a percentage of net revenue)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenue by product
       Local advertising83%79%70%
       Brand advertising121521
       Other services56 9
Total net revenue       100%       100%       100%
 
Costs and expenses:
       Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation
              and amortization shown separately below)7%7%7%
       Sales and marketing576266
       Product development161514
       General and administrative182321
       Depreciation and amortization555
       Restructuring and integration1
       Contribution to The Yelp Foundation 7
Total costs and expenses104113120
 
Loss from operations(4)(14)(20)
Other income (expense), net
Loss before income taxes(4)(14)(20)
Provision for income taxes
Net loss(4)%(14)%(20)%


Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

Net Revenue

2012to 2011 to 
2013% 2012 % 
Year Ended December 31,Change Change 
     2013     2012     2011          
(dollars in thousands)
Net revenue by product:
       Local advertising$    192,983$    109,159$    58,47377%87%
       Brand advertising  27,960 20,579 17,6863616
       Other services12,0457,829 7,126 54  10
              Total$232,988$137,567$83,28569%65%

    During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we focused on revenue growth related to our local advertiser customer base as well as the development of relationships with brand advertising agencies. Additionally, during the second half of 2012 we began selling Gift Certificates through our platform.

2013 Compared to 2012. Total net revenue increased $95.4$1.4 million or 69%, from 2012 to 2013. Our local advertising revenue increased $83.8 million, or 77%,that primarily due to a significant increase in the number of customers purchasing local advertising plans as we expanded our sales force to reach more local businesses. Our brand advertising revenue increased $7.4 million, or 36%, primarily due to an increase in the average spend per brand advertiser driven primarily by increased advertising impressions per brand advertiser. In addition, our other services revenue increased by $4.2 million, or 54%, primarily due to an increase in revenue from the sale of Yelp Deals and remnant advertising inventory and from added partnership arrangements.

2012 Compared to 2011.Total net revenue increased $54.3 million, or 65%, from 2011 to 2012. Our local advertising revenue increased by $50.7 million, or 87%, primarily due to a significant increase in the number of customers purchasing local advertising plans as we expanded our sales force to reach more prospective local businesses, as well as an increase in average sales per customer. In 2012, the number of customers purchasing local advertising plans increased 64% from 2011. Our brand advertising revenue also increased by $2.9 million, or 16%, due primarily to an increase in brand advertisers of 19% year over year. In addition, our other services revenue increased $0.7 million or 10%, from 2011 to 2012, primarily due to additional remnant advertising inventory and from increases in revenue from existing partnership arrangements related to online reservations, partially offset by not selling Yelp Deals via email in 2012.

47



Cost of Revenue

2012 to2011 to
2013 %2012 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
     2013     2012     2011          
(dollars in thousands)    
Cost of revenue$     16,561$     9,928$     5,93167%67%
Percentage of net revenue7%7% 7%

2013 Compared to 2012. In the year ended December 31, 2013, cost of revenue increased $6.6 million, or 67%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $1.7 million in outside hosting and Internet service fees, which are necessary to support the increase in visitors to our website and transactions completed on our website. In addition, setup costs, including video production, for active local business pages increased by $1.3 million due to increased demand by local businesses for video on their business pages, and expenses related to creative design for brand and local advertising customers increased $0.2 million. Merchant fees related to credit card transactions for local advertising also increased $1.8 million, and we added personnel to support our website infrastructure resulting in an increase of $1.6 million.

2012 Compared to 2011. In the year ended December 31, 2012, cost of revenue increased $4.0 million, or 67%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $1.9 million in outside hosting and Internet service fees, which are necessary to support the increase in visitors and transactions completed on our website, and an increase of $0.7 million in merchant fees related to credit card transactions for local advertising. We incurred an increase in video hosting fees related to slide shows on our website for $0.6 million. We incurred an increase of $0.4 million in expenses related to creative design for brand advertising customers. Lastly, we added personnel to support our website infrastructure resulting in an increase of $0.3 million.



Sales and Marketing

                    2012 to     2011 to
2013 %2012 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
 201320122011  
(dollars in thousands) 
Sales and marketing $     131,970  $     85,915 $     54,53954% 58%
Percentage of net revenue57%62% 66%

2013 Compared to 2012. In the year ended December 31, 2013, sales and marketing expenses increased $46.1 million, or 54%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount and related expenses of $30.2 million, including an increase in stock-based compensation of $5.2 million, as we expanded our sales organization to take advantageconsisted of the market opportunity created by increased recognitionrecording of the value of our platform and increased use of our free online business accounts. As a result of our increase in net revenue, our commission expenses also increased $9.4 million. In addition, we experienced an increase in facilities and related allocations of $6.4 million. Domestic and international marketing and advertising costs increased by $0.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we spent $20.2 million related to our international sales and marketing operations compared to $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

2012 Compared to 2011. In the year ended December 31, 2012, sales and marketing expenses increased $31.4 million, or 58%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount and related expenses of $23.3 million, including an increase in stock-based compensation of $3.3 million, as we expanded our sales organization, including our international sales organization, to take advantage of the market opportunity created by increased recognition of the value of our platform and increased use of our free online business accounts. As a result of our increase in net revenue, our commission expenses also increased $3.5 million. In addition, we experienced an increase in facilities and related allocations of $5.0 million and domestic and international marketing and advertising costs of $0.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we spent $13.2 million related to our international sales and marketing operations compared to $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Product Development

                    2012 to     2011 to
2013 %2012 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
201320122011
(dollars in thousands)  
Product development$     38,243$     20,473$     11,58687%77%
Percentage of net revenue 16%  15% 14% 

2013 Compared to 2012. In the year ended December 31, 2013, product development expenses increased $17.8 million, or 87%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount and related expenses of $15.3 million, including an increase in stock-based compensation of $4.6 million, and an increase of $1.2 million in the use of outside consultants as we continued to invest in adding features and functionality to our website and mobile app. In addition, we experienced an increase in facilities and related expenses of $1.3 millionvaluation allowance on certain foreign deferred tax assets as a result of winding down of sales and marketing activities outside of the increaseUnited States and Canada. Income tax expense decreased $10.6 million in headcount.

2012 Compared to 2011.In the year ended December 31, 2012, product development expenses increased $8.9 million, or 77%,2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount and related expenses of $7.7 million, including an increase in stock-based compensation of $1.0 million, as we continued to invest in adding features and functionality to our website and mobile app. In addition, we experienced an increase in facilities and related allocations of $0.6 million as a result of the increase in headcount. Lastly, we incurred an increase in consulting and outside services of $0.5 million for investing in systems and support for the growth of the business.



General and Administrative

                    2012 to     2011 to
2013 %2012 %
Year Ended December 31,ChangeChange
201320122011
 (dollars in thousands)   
General and administrative$     42,907 $     31,531  $     17,234 36%83%
Percentage of net revenue 18%  23% 21%  

2013 Compared to 2012. In the year ended December 31, 2013, general and administrative expenses increased $11.4 million, or 36%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount and related expenses of $6.5 million, including an increase in stock-based compensation of $1.2 million. Additionally, we invested in our systems and support for the growth of the business through the use of outside consultants, which contributed to the increase by $2.4 million. In addition, we experienced an increase in facilities and related expenses of $1.7 million and an increase in bad debt expense of $1.3 million. These increases were offset by a decrease in legal costs of $0.5 million due to recent court decisions on prior litigation claims.

2012 Compared to 2011.In the year ended December 31, 2012, general and administrative expenses increased $14.3 million, or 83%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount and related expenses of $9.2 million as we continued to invest in key accounting, finance and management positions within the organization to support the growth of the Company and greater compliance requirements associated with being a publicly traded company, including an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $5.6 million related primarily to the acceleration of vesting of stock options held by two executives in connection with the completion of our IPO. Additionally, we invested in the growth of the business through the use of outside consultants, which contributed to the increase by $1.7 million, had an increase in bad debt expense of $1.3 million, an increase in legal expense of $0.7 million and an increase in facilities and related allocations of $0.6 million.

Depreciation and Amortization

                    2012 to     2011 to
2013 %2012 %
Year Ended December 31, ChangeChange
201320122011 
(dollars in thousands)
Depreciation and amortization $     11,455 $     7,223$     4,238 59%70%
Percentage of net revenue5%5% 5%

2013 Compared to 2012. In the year ended December 31, 2013, depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.2 million, or 59%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase was primarily the result of our investments in expanding our technology infrastructure and capital assets to support our increase in headcount across the organization. Depreciation and amortization related to our fixed assets and capitalized website and internal use software development costs increased $1.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively. In addition, amortization related to our intangibles increased $1.9 million2015 primarily due to the intangibles acquiredvaluation allowance recorded in the Qype and SeatMe acquisitions.

2012 Compared to 2011.In the year ended December 31, 2012, depreciation and amortization2015 against certain deferred tax assets. Income tax expense increased $3.0$37.2 million or 70%,in 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily the result of our investments in expanding our technology infrastructure and capital assets. Our technology infrastructure costs have increased in order to support the growth in new products and features for the desktop and mobile applications as well to support the increased demand on our website due to continued growth in user traffic. Depreciation and amortization related to our fixed assets and capitalized website and internal use software development costs increased $1.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Additionally, amortization related to our intangibles increased by $0.3 million2014 primarily due to the acquired intangibles from the Qype acquisition.valuation allowance recorded in 2015 against certain deferred tax assets and release of valuation allowance in 2014.



Restructuring and Integration

Year Ended
December 31,
     2013     2012     2011
 (in thousands)
Restructuring and integration$     675 $     1,262 $     

2013 Compared to 2012.In the year ended December 31, 2013, we incurred restructuring and integration costsTable of $0.7 million, compared to $1.3 million for year ended December 31, 2012. In 2013, we announced our plan to further reduce the size of the Qype workforce. These actions were made in order to reduce our cost structure, enhance operating efficiencies and strengthen our business to achieve long-term profitable growth. We incurred the restructuring and integration costs of $0.7 million as a result of this plan. The restructuring plan was substantially completed during 2013. We expect that any additional expense related to this restructuring plan incurred in the future will be immaterial.Contents

2012 Compared to 2011.In the year ended December 31, 2012, following the acquisition of Qype, we announced our plan to reduce the size of the Qype workforce and to terminate several of Qype’s leases. These actions were made in order to reduce our cost structure, enhance operating efficiencies and strengthen our business to achieve long-term profitable growth. As a result of this plan, we incurred restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of 2012 of $1.3 million.

Contribution to The Yelp Foundation

Year Ended
December 31,
     2013     2012     2011
(in thousands)
Contribution to The Yelp Foundation $      $      $     5,928

    In the year ended December 31, 2011, we issued 520,000 shares of common stock to The Yelp Foundation as a charitable contribution. We recorded an expense in the amount of $5.9 million for the contribution based on the fair value of the common stock on the date the shares were issued to The Yelp Foundation. There were no contributions to The Yelp Foundation in either 2013 or 2012.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Year Ended December 31,
     2013     2012     2011
(in thousands)
Interest income$     62$     51$     13
Transaction gains (losses), net on foreign exchange (251)(259) (393)
Other non-operating loss, net (218)  (18)(15)
       Total other income (expense), net$(407)$(226)$(395)

2013 Compared to 2012. In the year ended December 31, 2013, other income (expense), net decreased $0.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The decrease was largely driven by a loss on the disposal of assets.

2012 Compared to 2011.In the year ended December 31, 2012, other income (expense), net increased $0.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. In 2012, the transaction losses on foreign exchange were largely driven by unfavorable changes in the exchange rate between the Euro and the British pound sterling. In 2011, transaction losses on foreign exchange were driven by unfavorable changes in the exchange rates between the Euro and the U.S. dollar. 



Provision for Income Taxes

Year Ended December 31,
     2013     2012     2011
 (in thousands)    
Provision for income taxes$     838 $     122 $     102

2013 Compared to 2012. In the year ended December 31, 2013, income tax expense increased $716,000 because of taxes due in foreign jurisdictions and state taxes.

2012 Compared to 2011.In the year ended December 31, 2012, income tax expense increased $20,000 because of taxes due in foreign jurisdictions.



Quarterly Results of Operations and Other Data

The following tables set forth our unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of operations data and our consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of net revenue for each of the eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2013.2016. We also present other financial and operational data and a reconciliation of net lossincome (loss) to adjusted EBITDA. We have prepared thethis quarterly data on a consistent basis with the audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. In the opinion of management, the quarterly financial information reflects all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this data. This information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The results of historical periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for any future period.

Quarter Ended
Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,March 31,
  2016  2016  2016  2016  2015  2015  2015  2015
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of 
Operations Data:    
Net revenue by product(1) 
       Advertising$   176,547$   168,950$   156,697$   143,047$   131,698$   121,864$   113,525$   104,329
       Transactions16,56815,91015,51814,49913,97111,97311,3046,606
       Brand advertising----7,1048,9788,3036,627
       Other services1,6811,3721,2131,067958744781946
Total net revenue$194,796$186,232$173,428$158,613$153,731$143,559$133,913$   118,508
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown separately below)(2)$15,604$14,594$15,087$15,078$15,000$14,259$13,057$   8,699
Sales and marketing(2)93,55099,27494,40295,62887,53582,94968,01463,266
Product development(2)36,86036,36933,09832,22228,97028,51126,34523,960
General and administrative(2)27,37224,87623,46421,76920,65920,99019,28019,937
Depreciation and amortization9,4349,1598,5648,1897,9807,5627,1676,895
Restructuring and integration3,455-------
Total costs and expenses$186,275$184,272$174,615$172,886$160,144$154,271$133,863$   122,757
 
Income (Loss) from operations$8,521$1,960$(1,187)$(14,273)$(6,413)$(10,712)$50$   (4,249)
Other income (expense), net74232736725840(545)329562
Income (Loss) before income taxes$9,263$2,287$(820)$(14,015)$(6,373)$(11,257)$379$   (3,687)
Benefit from (Provision for) income taxes(1,000)(217)1,269(1,437)(15,856)3,175(1,684)2,403
Net income (loss) attributable to
common stockholders (Class A and B)$8,263$2,070$449$(15,452)$(22,229)$(8,082)$(1,305)$   (1,284)
Net income (loss) per share attributable
to common stockholders (Class A and B):
Basic$0.10$0.03$0.01$(0.20)$(0.29)$(0.11)$(0.02)$    (0.02)
Diluted$0.10$0.02$0.01$(0.20)$(0.29)$(0.11)$(0.02)$    (0.02)
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss)
per share attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B):
Basic78,85177,52176,46775,88475,37275,01974,63173,684
Diluted84,36482,91779,28075,88475,37275,01974,63173,684



Table of Contents

Quarter Ended
     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,
20132013201320132012201220122012
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
      Data: 
Net revenue by product
              Local advertising$    58,052$    51,167$    44,797$    38,967$    33,945$    28,485$    25,255$    21,473
              Brand advertising9,2446,9107,0484,7584,9975,8865,7033,994
              Other services3,3553,1043,1782,4082,2152,0001,6951,918
Total net revenue$70,651$61,181$55,023$46,133$41,157$36,371$32,653$27,385
 
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation
       and amortization shown separately
       below)(1)4,9264,2774,0183,3403,0032,5012,2982,126
Sales and marketing(1)38,84734,12630,80328,19425,51121,30220,33318,770
Product development(1)11,80211,2087,9977,2366,2445,7534,3364,140
General and administrative(1)13,46010,53510,1488,7647,8526,9875,96310,729
Depreciation and amortization3,5242,8162,6372,4782,4211,7801,6611,361
Restructuring and integration(1)6751,262
Total costs and expenses72,55962,96255,60350,68746,29338,32334,59137,126
 
Loss from operations(1,908)(1,781)(580)(4,554)(5,136)(1,952)(1,938)(9,741)
Other income (expense), net(109)(31)(66)(201)(203)(14)22(30)
 
Loss before income taxes(2,017)(1,812)(646)(4,755)(5,339)(1,966)(1,916)(9,771)
Provision for income taxes(52)(510)(232)(44)20(45)(66)(31)
Net loss(2,069)(2,322)(878)(4,799)(5,319)(2,011) (1,982)(9,802)
Accretion of preferred stock   (31)
Net loss attributable to common
       stockholders (Class A and B)$(2,069)$(2,322)$(878)$(4,799)$(5,319)$(2,011)$(1,982)$(9,833)
 
Net loss per share attributable to common
       stockholders (Class A and B):
Basic $(0.03)$(0.04)$(0.01)$(0.08)$(0.08)$(0.03)$(0.03)$(0.31)
Diluted$(0.03)$(0.04)$(0.01)$(0.08)$(0.08)$(0.03)$(0.03)$(0.31)
 
Weighted-average shares used to compute
       net loss per share attributable to
       common stockholders (Class A and B):
Basic68,84765,53064,57663,73363,00361,26760,88731,263
Diluted68,84765,53064,57663,73363,00361,26760,88731,263
 
Stock-based compensation
              Cost of revenue$140$104$105$72$38$27$35$23
              Sales and marketing3,2012,6602,2821,9881,7461,1528951,124
              Product development2,7051,7091,040816696466300243
              General and administrative2,7432,5422,2861,7297786896286,039
              Restructuring and integration555
Total stock-based compensation$8,789$7,015$5,713$5,160$3,258$2,334$1,858$7,429
(1)      For purposes of comparison, the following table presents the Company’s net revenue by product line for the periods indicated (in thousands) based on the revenue categories presented in our SEC filings prior to this Annual Report. Refer to “Business — Our Products” for more information on the change to our revenue classifications.

Quarter Ended
Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,
   2016   2016   2016   2016   2015   2015   2015   2015
(dollars in thousands)
Net revenue by product
       Local$    171,128$    163,571$    151,879$    138,116$    125,852$    115,932$    107,882$    98,570
       Transactions16,56815,91015,51814,49913,97111,97311,3046,606
       Brand advertising----7,1048,9788,3036,627
       Other services7,1006,7516,0315,9986,8046,6766,4246,705
Total net revenue$194,796$186,232$173,428$158,613$153,731$143,559$133,913$118,508

(1)(2)Includes non-cash stock-based compensation expense.expense as follows:

Quarter Ended
Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,
    2016    2016    2016    2016    2015    2015    2015    2015
(dollars in thousands)
Stock-based compensation
       Cost of revenue$    874$    764$    407$    401$    336$    435$    222$    124
       Sales and marketing6,7227,1916,8436,3425,8035,5685,6544,937
       Product development10,5959,2848,4138,0306,3145,9476,0655,105
       General and administrative5,6735,3215,0634,3373,5193,7333,5753,505
Total stock-based compensation$23,864$22,560$20,726$19,110$15,972$15,683$15,516$13,671


Quarter Ended
Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,
     2013     2013     2013     2013     2012     2012     2012     2012
(as a percentage of net revenue)
Consolidated Statements of
      Operations Data:
Net revenue by product
       Local advertising82%84%81%85%82%78%77%78%
       Brand advertising1311131012161815
              Other services55656657
Total net revenue100%100%100%100%100%100%100%100%
 
Costs and expenses:
       Cost of revenue77777778
       Sales and marketing5556566162596269
       Product development1718151615161315
       General and administrative1917181919191839
       Depreciation and amortization55556555
       Restructuring and integration13
Total costs and expenses103103101109112106106136
 
Loss from operations(3)(3)(1)(10)(12)(6)(6)(36)
Other income (expense), net
Loss before income taxes(3)(3)(1)(10)(13)(6)(6) (36)
Provision for income taxes   (1)     
Net loss(3)%(4)% (1)% (10)%(13)%(6)%(6)%(36)%

Quarter Ended
     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,
20132013201320132012201220122012
(in thousands)
Other Financial and Operational
      Data(1): 
Reviews52,75747,32242,52639,10335,95933,25830,25927,569
Unique Visitors120,005 117,447108,058102,065 86,30883,53878,32971,448 
Claimed Local Business Locations 1,4881,344  1,222 1,103 994889 791700
Active Local Business Accounts675751 4540  36 32  27
Adjusted EBITDA$    10,405 $    8,050$    7,770$    3,204$    1,805$    2,162$    1,581$    (951)

The following table presents other financial and operational data:

Quarter Ended
Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,
   2016   2016   2016   2016   2015   2015   2015   2015
(dollars in thousands)
Other Financial and Operational Data(1):
Reviews121,022115,259108,251101,56495,21089,63583,10277,346
Desktop Unique Visitors73,46677,16273,40677,43374,60778,90179,17579,543
Mobile Web Unique Visitors65,35172,04069,32768,55165,86069,11764,71562,923
App Unique Devices24,07324,90023,01021,18620,00620,12118,09716,039
Claimed Local Business Locations3,3633,1923,0102,8342,6482,5032,3492,193
Advertising and Subscription Accounts1381351281211111049790
Adjusted EBITDA$    45,274$    33,679$    28,103$    13,026$    17,539$    12,533$    22,733$    16,317

(1)For information on how we define these operational and other metrics, see “—Key Metrics.Metrics.



Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net loss.income (loss).

Quarter Ended
     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Sep 30,     Jun 30,     Mar 31,
20132013201320132012201220122012
(in thousands)
Reconciliation of adjusted
      EBITDA:
 
Net loss$    (2,069)$    (2,322)$    (878)$    (4,799)$    (5,319)$    (2,011)$    (1,982)$    (9,802)
Provision for income taxes5251023244(20)456631
Other (income) expense, net 10931 66201 203 14(22)30
Depreciation and amortization3,5242,816 2,6372,4782,4211,780  1,6611,361
Stock-based compensation8,789   7,015 5,713   4,605  3,258 2,3341,858   7,429
Restructuring and integration6751,262 
Adjusted EBITDA $10,405$8,050$7,770$3,204$1,805$2,162$1,581$(951)


Quarter Ended
Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,Dec 31,Sep 30,Jun 30,Mar 31,
   2016   2016   2016   2016   2015   2015   2015   2015
(dollars in thousands)
Reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss):
Net income (loss)$    8,263$    2,070$    449$    (15,452)$    (22,229)$    (8,082)$    (1,305)$    (1,284)
(Benefit from) Provision for income taxes1,000217(1,269)1,43715,856(3,175)1,684(2,403)
Other (income) expense, net(742)(327)(367)(258)(40)545(329)(562)
Depreciation and amortization9,4349,1598,5648,1897,9807,5627,1676,895
Stock-based compensation23,86422,56020,72619,11015,97215,68315,51613,671
Restructuring & Integration3,455-------
Adjusted EBITDA$45,274$33,679$28,103$13,026$17,539$12,533$22,733$16,317

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $389.8$272.2 million. Cash and cash equivalents consist of both cash and money market funds. Our cash held internationally as of December 31, 20132016 was $8.7$8.1 million. We did not have any short-term or long-term investments. Additionally, we do not have any outstanding bank loans or credit facilities in place.place as of December 31, 2016. Our investment portfolio is comprised of highly rated marketable securities, and our investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. The policy generally requires securities to be investment grade (i.e. rated ‘A’ or higher by bond rating firms) with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss. To date, we have been able to finance our operations and our acquisitions of SeatMe and Qype through proceeds from private and public financings, including our IPOinitial public offering in March 2012, our follow-on offering in October 2013, cash generated from operations and, to a lesser extent, fromcash provided by the exercise of employee stock options.options and purchases under the ESPP.



Table of Contents

Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend on many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with any cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements and anticipated purchases of property and equipment for at least the next 12 months. However, this estimate is based on a number of assumptions that may prove to be wrong and we could exhaust our available cash and cash equivalents earlier than presently anticipated. We may require or otherwise seek additional funds in the next 12 months to respond to business challenges, including the need to develop new features and products or enhance existing services, improve our operating infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses and technologies, and, accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds.

Amounts deposited with third partythird-party financial institutions exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Securities Investor Protection Corporation insurance limits, as applicable. These cash and cash equivalents could be impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail or are subjected to other adverse conditions in the financial markets. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to our cash and cash equivalents; however, we can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented.indicated:

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
     2013     2012     20112016     2015     2014
(in thousands)     (dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:
Purchases of property and equipment$     16,243$     7,524 $     4,798
Purchases of property, equipment and software$     (22,994)$     (31,127)$     (29,054)
Depreciation and amortization 11,4557,2234,238 35,34629,60417,590
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities 21,432 (99) 250
Cash provided by operating activities126,90057,36257,932
Cash used in investing activities(18,827) (40,592)(7,453)(55,572)(158,682)(228,674)
Cash provided by financing activities291,720 114,1731,58229,52226,44229,549

Operating ActivitiesActivities.

We generated $21.4$126.9 million of cash fromin operating activities duringin the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, primarily resulting from our net loss of $10.1$4.7 million, offset by non-cash stock-based compensation of $26.7 million,which included non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of $11.5$35.3 million, an increase in excess tax benefit from the exercisenon-cash stock-based compensation expense of stock-based award activity of $0.4$86.3 million which is reclassified as a financing activity, and non-cash provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns of $3.3$17.3 million. In addition, significant changes in our operating assets and liabilities resulted from the following:

increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $15.3 million, primarily driven by an increase in restaurant revenue share liability, accrued vacation and employee-related expenses, and the timing of invoices and payments to the vendors, particularly marketing-related vendors; and
decrease in prepaids and other assets of $5.7 million, primarily due to the collection of non-trade receivables

We used $0.1generated $57.4 million of cash fromin operating activities duringin the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, primarily resulting from our net loss of $19.1$32.9 million, which included non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of $29.6 million, non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $14.9$60.8 million, non-cash provision for doubtful accounts of $1.9$16.8 million and non-cash depreciationa $20.3 million expense related to a valuation allowance recorded against certain domestic and amortization of $7.2 million.foreign deferred tax assets. In addition, significant changes in our operating assets and liabilities resulted from the following:

  • increase in accounts receivable of $4.1 million due to an increase in billings for local advertising plans and brand advertising campaigns, as well as timing of payments from these customers;
  • increase in prepaids and other assets of $2.6 million relating to the increase in value added tax due from taxing authorities, prepaid business data and prepaid rent for our facilities; and
  • increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities of $2.0 million relating to the growth in the business and, more specifically, the increase in accrued bonus and commissions, increase in accrued vacation and employee related expenses, and deferred rent for new facilities.


increase in accounts receivable of $25.3 million due to an increase in billings for advertising plans, as well as the timing of payments from these customers;
increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $15.9 million related to the growth in our business, increase in restaurant revenue share liability, accrued vacation and employee-related expenses, and the timing of invoices and payments to vendors; and
increase in prepaids and other assets of $22.7 million relating to an increase in prepayments (primarily for marketing and business licenses) and deferred tax benefits.

We generated $0.3$57.9 million of cash fromin operating activities duringin the year ended December 31, 2011,2014, primarily resulting from our net lossincome of $16.7$36.5 million, offset by a non-cash expense of $5.9 million related to the contribution of common stock to The Yelp Foundation, non-cash stock-based compensation of $4.9 million andwhich included non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses of $4.2 million.$17.6 million, non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $42.3 million, non-cash provision for doubtful accounts of $7.2 million and a $28.2 million increase related to our release of valuation allowance previously recorded against certain domestic and foreign deferred tax assets. In addition, significant changes in our operating assets and liabilities resulted from the following:

  • increase in accounts receivable of $2.3 million due to an increase in billings for local advertising plans and brand advertising campaigns, as well as timing of payments from these customers; and
  • increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $4.0 million relating to the growth in the business and, more specifically, the increase in accrued vacation and employee related expenses, deferred rent for new facilities, as well as timing of invoices and payments to vendors.

increase in accounts receivable of $21.3 million due to an increase in billings for advertising plans and brand advertising campaigns, as well as the timing of payments from these customers;
increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $8.9 million relating to the growth in our business and the increase in accrued vacation and employee-related expenses, accrued cost of sales, deferred rent for new facilities, and timing of invoices and payments to vendors; and
increase in prepaids and other assets of $4.0 million relating to the increase in prepaid payroll bonuses, prepaid cost of sales and amounts due from others.

Investing ActivitiesActivities.

Our primary investing activities in 2013 were the purchaseyear ended December 31, 2016 consisted of SeatMe in July and the continued purchasepurchases of marketable securities, purchases of property and equipment to support the ongoing build out of our data centers and leasehold improvements for our new headquarters buildingfacilities in San Francisco and other locations. We also continued to invest inlocations, the purchase of technology hardware to support our growth in headcount and software to support website and mobile app development, andwebsite operations and our corporate infrastructure. Purchases of property, equipment and equipment, as well as leasehold improvements,software may vary from period to period due to the timing of the expansion of our offices, operations and website and internal-use software and development. We expect to continue to investour investment in property and equipment, leasehold improvements,leaseholds and the development of software for 2014 and thereafter.in 2017 to grow modestly from 2016 levels.

We used $18.8 million in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2013, including $2.1 million net of cash received related to the acquisition of SeatMe. In addition, we used $16.2 million for purchases of property, equipment and software and incurred expenditures of $4.9 million for capitalized website and software development costs. Cash used in investing was offset by $1.2 million of cash released from escrow related to the Qype acquisition, recorded as a measurement period adjustment to the initial fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Cash used in investing was also offset by a decrease in the required amount of letters of credit in connection with the San Francisco lease, which resulted in a decrease of $3.2 million in restricted cash.

    We used $40.6 million in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2012, including $24.1 million net of cash received for the acquisition of Qype. In addition, we used $7.5 million for purchases of property, equipment and software and incurred expenditures of $2.9 million for capitalized website and software development costs. We also entered into new lease agreements for office space in San Francisco and London. In connection with entry into such leases, we were obligated to deliver letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $6.0 million, which resulted in an increase of $6.0 million in restricted cash.

    We used $7.5$55.6 million of cash in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011. We purchased $4.82016. Cash used in investing activities primarily related to purchases of marketable securities of $275.0 million, an increase in expenditures related to website and internally developed software of $14.2 million, purchases of property, equipment and software of $23.0 million to support the growth in our business, our investment of $8.0 million in the preferred stock of Nowait and incurred expenditurespurchases of $2.5intangible data licenses of $0.2 million. In addition, as part of our lease agreements for additional office space, we were obligated to deliver additional letters of credit, which resulted in an increase of $0.8 million for capitalized website and software development costs.in restricted cash. Cash used in investing was offset by $265.5 million of maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity.



Table of Contents

Financing Activities

We generated $291.7used $158.7 million of cash from financingin investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2013. 2015. Cash used in investing activities primarily related to the $73.4 million cash portion of the purchase price of Eat24, purchases of marketable securities of $246.2 million, an increase in expenditures related to website and internally developed software of $11.7 million, purchases of intangible data licenses of $0.6 million and purchases of property, equipment, software and leasehold improvements of $31.1 million to support the growth in our business. Cash used in investing was offset by $202.9 million of maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity and the release of restrictions on cash of $1.4 million.

We used $228.7 million of cash in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2014, including $14.3 million net of cash received $276.5related to acquisitions during the year. Other cash used in investing activities primarily related to purchases of marketable securities of $210.5 million, as well as an increase in expenditures related to website and internally developed software of $11.3 million, purchases of perpetual data licenses of $1.7 million and purchases of property, equipment, software and leasehold improvements of $29.1 million to support the growth in our business and an increase in restricted cash of $14.8 million associated with letters of credit in connection with leased office space. Cash used in investing was offset by $53.0 million of maturities of investment securities held to maturity.

Financing Activities. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we generated $29.5 million in financing activities, primarily due to net proceeds of $20.6 million from our follow-on offering, netthe issuance of $12.4 million in total offering expenses, including underwriter commissioncommon stock upon the exercise of stock options and discounts associated with the transaction. We also generated $13.5$8.9 million in net proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock under the ESPP.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we generated $26.4 million in financing activities, primarily due to net proceeds of $12.3 million from the issuance of common stock related toupon the exercise of stock options, an increase of $0.4 million in excess tax benefit from the exercise of stock options and $2.0$8.9 million in net proceeds from the sale of stock under our 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP.ESPP and $6.6 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based award activity.

    We generated $114.2 million of cash from financing activities duringDuring the year ended December 31, 2012. We received $111.82014, we generated $29.5 million in proceeds from our IPO, net of $10.8 million in offering expenses, including underwriter commission and discounts associated with the transaction. With the exception of the IPO, our financing activities, during the year ended December 31, 2012 consisted primarily ofdue to net proceeds of $20.2 million from the issuance of common stock related toupon the exercise of stock options.



    We generated $1.6 million of cash from financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011, which consisted primarily of $2.0options and $8.9 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to the exercisesale of stock options. We used $0.5 million in financing activities in 2011 related tounder our deferred offering costs.ESPP.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off balance sheet arrangements in 2013, 20122016, 2015 or 2011.2014.

Contractual Obligations

We lease various office facilities, including our corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, under operating lease agreements that expire from 20142017 to 2021.2025. The terms of the lease agreements provide for rental payments on a graduated basis. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease periods. We do not have any debt or material capital lease obligations, and all of our property, equipment and software have been purchased with cash. As of December 31, 2013,2016, we had no material long-term purchase obligations outstanding with any vendors or third parties. Ourparties other than obligations related to the fit out of certain leasehold properties. As of December 31, 2016, the following table summarizes our future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations for equipment and office facilities are as follows as of December 31, 2013:facilities:

Payments Due by Period
     Total     Less Than 1 Year     1 – 3 Years     3 – 5 Years     More Than 5 Years
(in thousands)
Operating lease obligations $     103,100 $15,275 $32,548 $26,796 $28,481
     Payments Due by Period
Total     Less Than 1 Year     1 – 3 Years     3 – 5 Years     More Than 5 Years
(in thousands)
Operating lease obligations$307,513$42,321$88,804$83,987$92,401
Purchase obligations$39,841$19,426$20,415$-$-

The contractual commitment amounts in the table above are associated with binding agreements that are enforceable and legally binding. Obligationsdo not include obligations under contracts that we can cancel without a significant penalty are not included in the table above. Aspenalty. In addition, as of December 31, 2013,2016, our total liability for uncertain tax positions was $1.8$0.5 million of the total unrecognized benefit of $10.3 million. We are not reasonably able to reasonably estimate the timing of future cash flow related to this liability. As a result, this amount is not included in abovethe contractual obligations table.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

    Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

    We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with revenue recognition, website and internal-use software development costs, business combinations, income taxes and stock-based compensation have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies and estimates. For further information on all of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

    We generate revenue from local advertising, brand advertising and other services, which include Yelp Deals and various partner arrangements. Since 2007, net revenue from local advertising represented a majority of our revenue.

    We enter into arrangements with customers to sell advertising packages that include different media placements or ad services that are delivered at the same time, or within close proximity of one another, and we allocate consideration at the inception of an arrangement to all deliverables based on the relative selling price method in accordance with the selling price hierarchy. The objective of the hierarchy is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a stand-alone basis and requires the use of: (1) vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE, if available; (2) third-party evidence, or TPE, if VSOE is not available; and (3) best estimate of selling price, or BESP, if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.  table above.



VSOE. We determine VSOE based on our historical pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold separately. In determining VSOE, we require that a substantial majorityTable of the standalone selling prices for these services fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. Contents

We have not historically sold a large volumesubleased certain office facilities under operating lease agreements that expire in 2021. The terms of transactionsthese lease agreements provide for rental receipts on a standalonegraduated basis. As a result, we have not been able to establish VSOE for any of its advertising products.

TPE. When VSOE cannot be established for deliverables in multiple element arrangements, we apply judgment with respect to whether we can establish a selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. Generally, our go-to-market strategy differs from that of our peers and our offerings contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of services cannot be obtained. Furthermore, we are unable to reliably determine what similar competitor services’ selling prices are on a standalone basis. As a result, we have not been able to establish selling price based on TPE.

BESP. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use BESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the service were sold on a standalone basis. BESP is generally used to allocate the selling price to deliverables in our multiple element arrangements. We determine BESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices we charge for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape and pricing practices. We limit the amount of allocable arrangement consideration to amounts that are fixed or determinable and that are not contingent on future performance or future deliverables.

    If the facts and circumstances underlying the factors we considered change or should future facts and circumstances lead us to consider additional factors, both our determination of our relative selling price under the hierarchy and our BESPs could change in future periods.

Website and Internal-Use Software Development Costs

    We capitalize certain costs related to the development of our website, mobile app or software developed for internal use. In accordance with authoritative guidance, we begin to capitalize our costs to develop software when preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, management has authorized and committed project funding and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Such costs are amortizedrecognize sublease rentals on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the related asset, generally estimated to be two to three years. Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria together with costs incurred for training and maintenance are expensed as incurred and recorded in product development expenses on our consolidated statements of operations. Costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional features or functionality are capitalized and expensed over the estimated useful life of the enhancements, generally two or three years.

Business Combinations and Valuation of Goodwill and Other Acquired Intangible Assets

    We account for acquisitions of entities that include inputs and processes and have the ability to create outputs as business combinations. We allocate the purchase price of the acquisition to the tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over those fair values is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related expenses and restructuring costs are expensed as incurred. During the measurement period, which could be up to one year after the transaction date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. After the measurement period, subsequent adjustments are recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.

    We review goodwill for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. We have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our single reporting operating unit is less than its carrying amountlease periods reflected as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment under the new authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. If we determine that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount, or opt to not perform a qualitative assessment, then the two-step goodwill impairment test will be performed. The first step, identifying a potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the second step will be performed; otherwise, no further step is required. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. Any excess of the goodwill carrying amount over the applied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value.reduction in rental expense. As of December 31, 2013, no impairment of goodwill has been identified.



     Acquired intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We evaluate the recoverability of amortizable intangible assets for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amounts to the2016, our future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If such review indicates that the carrying amount of property and equipment and intangible assets is not recoverable, the carrying amount of such assets is reduced to fair value. We have not recorded any such impairment charge during the years presented.

     In addition to the recoverability assessment, we routinely review the remaining estimated useful lives of our amortizable intangible assets. If we reduce the estimated useful life assumption for any asset, the remaining unamortized balance would be amortized over the revised estimated useful life.

Income Taxes

     We account for our income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or in our income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities at the enacted statutory income tax rates in effect for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in income tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets and valuation allowances are provided when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amounts expectedminimum rental receipts to be realized.

     We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. We will recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our income tax provision in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

Stock-Based Compensation

     Stock-based compensation expenses are classified in the consolidated statement of operations based on the department to which the related employee reports. Our stock-based awards are comprised principally of stock options, restricted stock units, or RSUs, restricted stock awards, or RSAs, and our employee stock purchase plan.

     We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the authoritative guidance on stock compensation. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this guidance, stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. As a result, we are required to estimate the amount of stock-based compensation we expect to be forfeited based on our historical experience. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from our estimates, stock-based compensation expense and our results of operations could be materially impacted.

59



     Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. The determination of the grant date fair value using an option-pricing model is affected by our estimated common stock fair value as well as assumptions regarding a number of other complex and subjective variables. These variables include our expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the award, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, the risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the award and expected dividends. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense in our consolidated statements of operations. We estimate the expense for restricted stock awards and restricted stock units based on grant date fair value of our common stock.

     We account for stock options issued to non-employees in accordance with the guidance for equity-based payments to non-employees. We believe that the fair value of stock options is more reliably measured than the fair value of the services received. As such, the fair value of the unvested portion of the options granted to non-employees is re-measured each period. The resulting increase in value, if any, is recognized as expense during the period the related services are rendered.

     Prior to our IPO, our board of directors considered numerous objective and subjective factors to determine the fair market value of our common stock at each meeting at which stock optionsreceived under non-cancelable subleases were granted and approved.$8.3 million.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We have operations both within the United States and internationally, and we are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks include primarily interest rate, foreign exchange risks and inflation.

Interest Rate Fluctuation Risk

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing income without significantly increasing risk.

Our cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market funds. We do not have any long-term borrowings.

     The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing income without significantly increasing risk. Because our cash and cash equivalents have a relatively short maturity, our portfolio’stheir fair value is relatively insensitive to interest rate changes. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we determined that the nominal difference in basis points for investing our cash and cash equivalents in longer-term investments did not warrant a change in our investment strategy. In future periods, we will continue to evaluate our investment policy in order to ensure that we continue to meet our overall objectives. We believe a hypothetical 10% increase in the interest rates as of December 31, 20132016 would not have an immateriala material impact on our investmentcash and cash equivalents portfolio.

Our marketable securities are comprised of fixed-rate debt securities issued by U.S. corporations, U.S. government agencies and the U.S. Treasury; as such, their fair value may be affected by fluctuations in interest rates in the broader economy. As we have both the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity, such fluctuations would have no impact on our results of operations.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We have foreign currency risks related to our revenue and operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, principally in the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and the Euro. The volatility of exchange rates depends on many factors that we cannot forecast with reliable accuracy. Although we have experienced and will continue to experience fluctuations in our net income (loss) as a result of transaction gains (losses), net related to revaluing certain cash balances, trade accounts receivable balances and intercompany balances that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, we believe a hypothetical 10% strengthening/(weakening) of the U.S. dollar against the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar or Euro, either alone or in combination with a hypothetical 10% strengthening/(weakening) of the U.S. dollar against the Euroeach other, would not have a material impact on our results of operations. In the event our foreign sales and expenses continue to increase as a proportion of our overall sales and expenses, our operating results may be more greatly affected by fluctuations in the exchange rates of the currencies in which we do business. At this time, we do not but we may in the future, enter into derivatives or other financial instruments in an attempt to hedge our foreign currency exchange risk.risk, though we may in the future. It is difficult to predict the impact hedging activities would have on our results of operations.

Inflation Risk

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. If our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, financial condition andor results of operations.

60



Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Our financial statements and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm are included in this Annual Report beginning on page F-1. The index to these reports and our financial statements is included in Part IV, Item 15 below.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.



     None.Table of Contents

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company'scompany’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.December 31, 2016. Based on thethis evaluation, of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date,December 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.



Table of Contents

Management'sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth inInternal Control – Control—Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.2016. Our management reviewed the results of this evaluation with the audit committee of our board of directors.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report and, as part of the audit, has issued a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, which is included below.

Changes in Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 20132016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, believes that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and are effective at the reasonable assurance level. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by the collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

61




Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of
Yelp Inc.
San Francisco, California

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Yelp Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management'sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20132016 of the Company and our report dated February28, 2014March 1, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


San Jose,Francisco, California
February28, 2014March 1, 2017



Table of Contents

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

62




Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Information required by this item regarding directors and director nominees, executive officers, the board of directors and its committees, and certain corporate governance matters is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors,” “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” and “Executive Officers” in the definitive proxy statement for our 20142017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the 20142017 Proxy Statement. Information required by this item regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our 20142017 Proxy Statement.

We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The code of business conduct and ethics is available on our corporate website at www.yelp-ir.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=250809&p=irol-govhighlights.www.yelp-ir.com under the section entitled “Corporate Governance.” If we make any substantive amendments to our code of business conduct and ethics or grant to any of our directors or executive officers any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of our code of business conduct and ethics, we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Information required by this item regarding executive compensation is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the captions “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation” and “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” in our 20142017 Proxy Statement.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Information required by this item regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our 20142017 Proxy Statement. Information required by this item regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our 20142017 Proxy Statement.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Information required by this item regarding certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Transactions with Related Persons” in our 20142017 Proxy Statement. Information required by this item regarding director independence is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” in our 20142017 Proxy Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Information required by this item regarding principal accounting fees and services is incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Proposal No. 2—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our 20142017 Proxy Statement.

63




Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report:

     
1.       1.Financial Statements.Our consolidated financial statements and the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm are included herein on the pages indicated:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-1
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-2
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ EquityF-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7
 
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-2
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive LossF-4
Consolidated Statements ofRedeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7

2.Financial Statement Schedules. None. All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required under the instructions, or the requested information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
 
3.Exhibits. A list of exhibits filed with this report or incorporated herein by reference is found in the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page of this Annual Report.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.



Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February28, 2014March 1, 2017

YYelp Inc.ELPINC.
 
/s/ Rob KrolikCharles Baker
Rob KrolikCharles Baker
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

POWEROFATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Rob KrolikCharles Baker and Laurence Wilson, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution for him or her, and in his or her name in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and either of them, his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature     Title     Date
/s/ Jeremy StoppelmanChief Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary28, 2014March 1, 2017
JEREMYSTOPPELMANJeremy Stoppelman(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Geoff DonakerChief Operating Officer and DirectorFebruary28, 2014
GEOFFDONAKER
 
/s/ Rob KrolikCharles BakerChief Financial OfficerFebruary28, 2014March 1, 2017
ROBKROLIKCharles Baker(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Officer)
 
/s/ Max LevchinDiane IrvineChairmanChairpersonFebruary28, 2014March 1, 2017
MAXLEVCHINDiane Irvine
 
/s/ Fred AndersonDirectorFebruary28, 2014March 1, 2017
FREDANDERSONFred Anderson
/s/ Geoff DonakerDirectorMarch 1, 2017
Geoff Donaker
 
/s/ Peter FentonDirectorFebruary28, 2014March 1, 2017
PETERFENTONPeter Fenton
 
/s/ Robert GibbsDirectorFebruary28, 2014March 1, 2017
ROBERTGIBBSRobert Gibbs
 
/s/ Diane IrvineDirectorFebruary28, 2014
DIANEIRVINE
 
/s/ Jeremy LevineDirectorFebruary28, 2014March 1, 2017
JEREMYLEVINEJeremy Levine
 
/s/ Mariam NaficyDirectorFebruary28, 2014March 1, 2017
MARIAMNAFICYMariam Naficy

65



Table of Contents

EXHIBITINDEX

Filed
Incorporated by ReferenceHerewith
Exhibit
NumberExhibit Description FormFile No.ExhibitFiling Date
2.1     Share Purchase Agreement, dated October 23, 2012, by and among Yelp Inc., Yelp Ireland Ltd., Qype GmbH and the shareholders of Qype GmbH.     8-K     001-35444     99.1     10/24/2012     
2.2Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 18, 2013, by and among Yelp Inc., Ranger Merger Corp., Ranger Merger LLC, SeatMe, Inc. and Alexander Kvamme, as Stockholders’ Agent.8-K001-3544499.17/24/2013
2.3Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 9, 2015, by and among Yelp Inc., Eat24Hours.com, Inc., Kale Acquisition Corp., Quinoa Acquisition LLC, the Stockholders of Eat24Hours.com, Inc. and Nadav Sharon, as Stockholders’ Agent.8-K001-3544499.12/10/2015
3.1Certificate of Retirement.8-A/A001-354443.19/23/2016
3.2Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Yelp Inc.8-A/A001-354443.29/23/2016
3.3Amended and Restated Bylaws of Yelp Inc.S-1/A333-1780303.42/3/2012
4.1Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.
4.2Form of Common Stock Certificate.8-A/A001-354444.19/23/2016
10.1*Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1333-17803010.211/17/2011
10.2*Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1333-17803010.311/17/2011
10.3*2011 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1333-17803010.42/3/2012
10.4*Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1333-17803010.52/3/2012
10.5*2012 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.8-K001-3544410.19/23/2016
10.6*Forms of Option Agreement and Grant Notice and RSU Agreement and Grant Notice under 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1/A333-17803010.172/3/2012
10.7*2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.8-K001-3544410.29/23/2016
10.8*Executive Severance Benefit Plan.S-1/A333-17803010.192/3/2012
10.9*Form of Indemnification Agreement made by and between Yelp Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.S-1333-17803010.62/3/2012
10.10*Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Jeremy Stoppelman, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.152/3/2012
10.11*Employment Offer Letter, dated April 15, 2016, between Yelp Inc. and Charles Baker.8-K001-3544410.14/18/2016
10.12*Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Jed Nachman, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.92/3/2012


Table of Contents

Filed
 Incorporated by Reference    Herewith
Exhibit
NumberExhibit Description FormFile No.ExhibitFiling Date
10.13*     Letter Agreement, dated May 22, 2014, by and between Joseph Nachman and Yelp Inc.     8-K     001-35444     99.1     5/28/2014     
10.14*Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Laurence Wilson, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.102/3/2012
10.15*Offer Letter Agreement, dated March 27, 2007, by and between Yelp Inc. and Michael Stoppelman.X
10.16*Transition Agreement, dated February 17, 2017, by and between Yelp Inc. and Michael Stoppelman8-K001-3544410.12/17/2017
10.17*Amended and Restated Offer letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Geoff Donaker, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.72/3/2012
10.18*Transition Agreement, dated August 8, 2016, by and between Yelp Inc. and Geoff Donaker.8-K001-3544410.18/9/2016
10.19*Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Rob Krolik, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.82/3/2012
10.20*Transition Agreement, dated February 4, 2016, by and between Yelp Inc. and Rob Krolik8-K001-3544410.12/8/2016
10.21*Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement and Notice.8-K001-3544410.22/8/2016
10.22*Compensation Information for Registrant’s Executive Officers.8-K001-354442/17/2017
10.23Amended and Restated Lease, dated April 1, 2015, by and between Stockdale Galleria Project Owner, LLC and Yelp Inc.; First Amendment to Lease, dated July 30, 2015; Second Amendment to Lease, dated April 22, 2016; Third Amendment to Lease, dated July 22, 2016.X
10.24License Agreement between Harrison 160, LLC, as Licensor, and MRL Ventures Inc., as Licensee, dated as of April 6, 2004; Addendums through November 10, 2011.S-1/A333-17803010.142/3/2012
10.25Office Lease, dated May 9, 2012, by and between Yelp Inc. and Stockbridge 138 New Montgomery LLC, as amended.X
10.26Lease, dated July 31, 2014, by and between Yelp Inc. and 11 Madison Avenue LLC.8-K001-3544410.18/6/2014
21.1Subsidiaries of Yelp Inc.X
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.X
24.1Power of Attorney (included on signature page).X
31.1Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).X
31.2Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).X
32.1†Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.X
101.INS#XBRL Instance Document.X
101.SCH#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.X


Table of Contents

Filed
Incorporated by ReferenceHerewith
Exhibit
NumberExhibit DescriptionFormFile No.ExhibitFiling Date
101.CAL#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.X
101.DEF#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.X
101.LAB#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.X
101.PRE#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.X

*

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Yelp Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of
Yelp Inc.
San Francisco, California

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Yelp Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’income (loss), stockholders' equity, (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onthese the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Yelp Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (1992)(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February28March 1, 2017, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


San Jose,Francisco, California
February28March 1, 2017, 2014

F-1




Table of Contents

Yelp Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)

December 31, December 31,December 31,
     2013      2012 20162015
Assets
Current Assets:
Current assets:          
Cash and cash equivalents$       389,764$       95,124$     272,201$        171,613
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $810 and $384 at December 31, 2013
and 2012, respectively)21,31711,738
Short-term marketable securities207,332199,214
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,992 and $3,208
at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)68,72552,755
Prepaid expenses and other current assets5,7524,47012,92119,700
Total current assets416,833111,332561,179443,282
Property, equipment and software, net30,66614,79992,44080,467
Goodwill59,69048,605170,667172,197
Intangibles, net5,2355,93632,61139,294
Restricted cash3,2476,40017,31716,486
Other assets306624
Total Assets$515,977$187,696
Other non-current assets10,9923,701
Total assets$    885,206$  755,427
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$3,364$2,284$2,003$3,388
Accrued liabilities19,00414,97455,08243,458
Deferred revenue2,6212,8563,3142,931
Total current liabilities24,98920,11460,39949,777
Long-term liabilities4,5051,92017,62112,030
Total liabilities$29,494$22,03478,02061,807
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $0.000001 par value—500,000,000 shares authorized; 70,874,493, and 63,505,269
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.000001 par value — 200,000,000 and 500,000,000 shares
authorized, 79,429,833 and 75,982,802 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively--
Additional paid-in capital 553,753 225,245 892,983774,022
Accumulated other comprehensive income3,186805
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(15,576)(13,519)
Accumulated deficit (70,456)(60,388)(70,221)(66,883)
Total Stockholders’ Equity486,483165,662
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$515,977$187,696
Total stockholders’ equity807,186693,620
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$885,206$755,427

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2




Table of Contents

Yelp Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
     2013      2012      2011     2016     2015     2014
Net revenue$       232,988$       137,567$       83,285$     713,069$     549,711$     377,536
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below)16,5619,9285,931
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization60,36351,01524,382
shown separately below)
Sales and marketing131,97085,91554,539382,854301,764201,050
Product development38,24320,47311,586138,549107,78665,181
General and administrative42,90731,53117,23497,48180,86658,274
Depreciation and amortization11,4557,2234,23835,34629,60417,590
Restructuring and integration6751,2623,455--
Contribution to The Yelp Foundation5,928
Total costs and expenses241,811156,33299,456718,048571,035366,477
Loss from operations(8,823)(18,765)(16,171)
Other income (expense), net(407)(226)(395)
Loss before income taxes(9,230)(18,991)(16,566)
Provision for income taxes(838)(122)(102)
Net loss(10,068)(19,113)(16,668)
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock(32)(189)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B)$(10,068)$(19,145)$(16,857)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B)
Income (Loss) from operations(4,979)(21,324)11,059
Other income, net1,694386221
Income (Loss) before income taxes(3,285)(20,938)11,280
Benefit from (Provision for) income taxes(1,385)(11,962)25,193
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B)$(4,670)$(32,900)$36,473
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B)
Basic$(0.15)$(0.35)$(1.10)$(0.06)$(0.44)$0.51
Diluted$(0.15)$(0.35)$(1.10)$(0.06)$(0.44)$0.48
Weighted-average shares used to compute net loss per share attributable to 
common stockholders (Class A and B)   
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share
attributable to common stockholders (Class A and B)(1)
Basic65,66554,14915,291 77,18674,68371,936
Diluted65,66554,14915,29177,18674,68376,712

See notes(1)       The structure of the Company’s common stock changed in the year ended December 31, 2016. Refer to consolidated financial statements.

F-3Note 14 for details.



Yelp Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands)

Year Ended December 31,
2013     2012     2011
Net loss$     (10,068)$(19,113)$(16,668)
 
Other comprehensive income:
       Foreign currency translation adjustments2,381534298
Other comprehensive income2,381534298
 
Comprehensive loss$(7,687)$     (18,579)$     (16,370)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



Table of Contents

Yelp Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)

Year Ended December 31,
201620152014
Net income (loss)     $     (4,670)     $     (32,900)     $     36,473
Other comprehensive loss:
       Foreign currency translation adjustments(2,057)(7,910)(8,795)
Other comprehensive loss(2,057)(7,910)(8,795)
Comprehensive income (loss)$(6,727)$(40,810)$27,678

See notes to consolidated financial statements



Table of Contents

Yelp Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 20122014, 2015 AND 20132016
(In thousands, except shares)share data)

     Redeemable                     Accumulated          
ConvertibleAdditionalOtherTotal
Preferred StockCommon StockPaid-InComprehensiveAccumulatedStockholders’
Shares     AmountSharesAmountCapitalIncome (Loss)DeficitDeficit
Balance—January 1, 2011143,267,115$55,24614,848,625$$3,524$(27)$(24,386)$(20,889)
Issuance of common stock upon
       exercises of employee stock
       options1,419,0342,1252,125
Issuance of restricted stock168,750
Stock-based compensation5,0485,048
Issuance of common stock as
       charitable contribution to The Yelp
       Foundation520,0005,9285,928
Accretion of redeemable convertible
       preferred stock189(189)(189)
Foreign currency translation
       adjustment298298
Net loss(16,668)(16,668)
 
Balance—December 31, 2011143,267,11555,43516,956,40916,625271(41,243)(24,347)
 
Issuance of common stock upon
       exercises of employee stock
       options1,606,6123,7363,736
Issuance of restricted stock1,250
Stock-based compensation15,14715,147
Accretion of redeemable convertible
       preferred stock32(32)(32)
Conversion of preferred stock to
       common stock in connection with
       initial public offering(143,267,115)(55,467)35,816,77255,46655,466
Issuance of common stock in
       connection with initial public
       offering, net of offering costs.8,172,500111,350111,350
Repurchase of common stock from
       employees(17,193)(333)(333)
Issuance of common stock in
       connection with acquisition of
       Qype GmbH968,91923,25423,254
Foreign currency translation
       adjustment534534
Net loss(19,113)(19,113)
 
Balance—December 31, 201263,505,269225,245805(60,388)165,662
 
Issuance of common stock upon
       exercises of employee stock
       options2,648,12113,55413,554
Issuance of common stock upon
       release of restricted stock units
       (RSUs)98,033
Issuance of common stock for
       employee stock purchase plan81,9001,9601,960
Stock-based compensation27,17027,170
Issuance of common stock in
       connection with follow-on public
       offering, net of offering costs4,312,500276,527276,527
Repurchase of common stock from
       employees(15,850)(674)(674)
Issuance of common stock in
       connection with acquisition of
       SeatMe, Inc.244,5209,6669,666
Excess tax benefit from share-based
       award activity305305
Foreign currency translation
       adjustment2,3812,381
Net loss(10,068)(10,068)
 
Balance—December 31, 2013$70,874,493$$553,753$3,186$(70,456)$486,483
Accumulated
AdditionalOtherTotal
Common StockPaid-InComprehensiveAccumulatedStockholders'
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Income (Loss)  Deficit  Equity
Balance—December 31, 201370,874,493$     -$553,753$         3,186$     (70,456)$     486,483
Issuance of common stock upon exercises of employee 
       stock options1,679,654-20,164--20,164
Issuance of common stock upon release of
       restricted stock units (RSUs)90,656-----
Issuance of common stock for employee stock purchase plan279,538-8,869--8,869
Stock-based compensation (inclusive of capitalized stock-based
       compensation)--44,520--44,520
Repurchase of common stock from employees(18,628)-(1,318)--(1,318)
Issuance of common stock in connection with
       acquisition of SeatMe, Inc.14,869-----
Excess tax benefit from share-based award activity--1,754--1,754
Foreign currency translation adjustment---(8,795)-(8,795)
Net income----36,47336,473
Balance—December 31, 201472,920,582-    627,742    (5,609)(33,983)588,150
Issuance of common stock upon exercises of employee
       stock options935,143-12,255--12,255
Issuance of common stock upon release of
       restricted stock units (RSUs)422,981-----
Issuance of common stock for employee stock purchase plan312,697-8,911--8,911
Stock-based compensation (inclusive of capitalized stock-based
       compensation)--63,887--63,887
Repurchase of common stock from employees(12,022)-(482)--(482)
Issuance of common stock in connection with
       acquisition of SeatMe, Inc.577-----
Issuance of common stock in connection with
       acquisition of Eat24Hours.com, Inc.1,402,844-59,158--59,158
Excess tax benefit from share-based award activity--2,551--2,551
Foreign currency translation adjustment---(7,910)-(7,910)
Net loss----(32,900)(32,900)
Balance—December 31, 201575,982,802-     774,022(13,519)(66,883)693,620
Cumulative effect adjustment upon
       adoption of ASU 2016-09(1)--(1,163)-1,332169
Issuance of common stock upon exercises of employee
       stock options1,290,836-20,599--20,599
Issuance of common stock upon release of
       restricted stock units (RSUs)1,814,138-----
Issuance of common stock for employee stock purchase plan342,057-8,923--8,923
Stock-based compensation (inclusive of capitalized stock-based
       compensation)--90,602--90,602
Foreign currency translation
       adjustment---(2,057)-(2,057)
Net loss----(4,670)(4,670)
Balance—December 31, 201679,429,833$-$892,983$(15,576)$(70,221)$807,186

(1)       Adopted on a modified retrospective basis; refer to significant accounting policies in Note 2 for details regarding this adoption.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5




Table of Contents

Yelp Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

     Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2013     2012     2011     2016     2015     2014
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss$(10,068)$(19,113)$     (16,668)$     (4,670)$     (32,900)$     (36,473)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization11,4557,2234,23835,34629,60417,590
Provision for doubtful accounts3,3041,913627
Provision for doubtful accounts and sales returns17,26116,7887,238
Stock-based compensation26,67714,8784,87786,26160,84242,273
Contribution to The Yelp Foundation5,928
Loss on disposal of assets and web-site development costs1596413
Excess tax benefit from share-based award activity(353)
Recording (release) of valuation allowance1,35120,341(28,197)
Loss on disposal of assets2772134
Premium amortization, net, on marketable securities1,3481,190349
Excess tax benefit from stock-based award activity-(6,583)(1,834)
Realized gain on investments-(4)-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable(12,843)(4,118)(2,274)(31,624)(25,279)(21,291)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(1,572)(2,552)(1,099)5,687(22,703)(4,011)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities4,9712,0493,975
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities15,27815,894(8,927)
Deferred revenue(298)(443)633385(41)411
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities21,432(99)250
Net cash provided by operating activities126,90057,36257,932
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of SeatMe, net of cash received(2,057)
Acquisition of Qype GmbH, net of cash received(24,125)
Purchases of property, equipment, and software(16,243)(7,524)(4,798)
Purchases of marketable securities(274,965)(246,160)(210,459)
Maturities of marketable securities265,500202,87053,002
Purchase of cost-method investment(8,000)--
Acquisition, net of cash received-(73,422)(14,340)
Purchases of property, equipment and software(22,994)(31,127)(29,054)
Proceeds from sale of property, equipment and software8813414
Capitalized website and software development costs(4,856)(2,930)(2,506)(14,191)(11,734)(11,349)
Change in restricted cash3,176(6,013)(149)
Goodwill measurement period adjustment1,153
Purchases of intangible assets(179)(647)(1,724)
Changes in restricted cash(831)1,404(14,764)
Net cash used in investing activities(18,827)(40,592)(7,453)(55,572)(158,682)(228,674)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of underwriter fees114,006
Proceeds from follow-on offering, net of offering costs276,527
Payments for deferred offering costs(2,200)(456)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from share-based awards13,5543,6752,038
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from employee stock purchase plan1,960
Proceeds from issuance of common stock for employee stock-based plans29,52221,16629,033
Excess tax benefit from share-based award activity-6,5831,834
Repurchase of common stock(674)-(482)(1,318)
Excess tax benefit from share-based award activity353
Repayment of acquired debt(1,308)
Contingent consideration payment-(825)-
Net cash provided by financing activities291,720     114,1731,58229,52226,44229,549
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS315(94)283(262)(821)(1,259)
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS294,64073,388(5,338)100,588(75,699)(142,452)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period95,12421,73627,074171,613247,312389,764
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period$     389,764$95,124$21,736$272,201$171,613$247,312
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF OTHER CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income taxes$291$110$92
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds$813$352$1,972
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment recorded in accounts payable and accruals$2,685$549$690
Deferred offering costs recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities$$$887
Capitalized website and software development costs recorded in accounts payable and accruals$17$4$
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock$$32$189
Vesting of early exercised options$$61$87
Purchases of property, equipment and software recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities$989$2,233$6,543
Goodwill measurement period adjustment146(255)-
Contingent consideration related to acquisitions--(835)
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition-59,158-

See notes to consolidated financial statements.



Table of Contents

Yelp Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 AND 20112014

1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Yelp Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on September 3, 2004. Except where specifically noted or the context otherwise requires, the use of terms such as the “Company” and “Yelp” in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements refers to Yelp Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Yelp connects people with great local businesses. Yelp’s users have contributed millions of reviews of almost every type of local business, giving a voice to consumers andbusinesses by bringing “word of mouth” online.online and providing a platform for businesses and consumers to engage and transact. Yelp’s platform is transforming the way people discover local businesses; every day, millions of consumers visit its website or use its mobile app to find great local businesses to meet their everyday needs. Businesses of all sizes use the Yelp platform to engage with consumers at the critical moment when they are deciding where to spend their money.

The Company is comprisedconsists of Yelp Inc. and 1715 wholly-owned entities. Yelp UK Ltd was incorporated on December 1, 2008, Yelp CanadaDarwin Social Marketing Inc. was incorporated on February 24, 2009, Yelp Ireland Limited was incorporated on May 31, 2010, Yelp Deutschland GmbH was incorporated on June 7, 2010, Yelp Ireland Holding Company Limited was incorporated on June 16, 2010, Yelp France SAS was incorporated on July 8, 2010, Yelp Italia S.r.l. was incorporated on June 27, 2011, Yelp Australia Pty. Ltd was incorporated on August 9, 2011, Yelp Spain, S.L. was incorporated on May 4, 2012, Yelp Singapore PTE Ltd was incorporated on June 15, 2012, Yelp Brazil Serviços de Marketing Ltda. was incorporated on May 29, 2013, and Yelp Japan, G.K. was incorporated on September 20, 2013.2013 and Darwin Sweden AB was incorporated on September 4, 2014.Yelp GmbH (formerly Qype GmbH, Qype Ltd., GmbH) andQype SARL and Qype SL (collectively, “Qype”) were acquired on October 23, 2012, and SeatMe,2012. Eat24, LLC (the successor to Eat24Hours.com, Inc.) (“Eat24”) was acquired on July 24, 2013February 9, 2015 (see Note 4)5). The financial results of these subsidiaries are included within the consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein.

Basis of Presentation—The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain Significant Risks and Uncertainties—The Company operates in a dynamic industry and, accordingly, can be affected by a variety of factors. For example, the Company’s management believes that changes in any of the following areas could have a significant negative effectimpact on the Company in terms of its future financial position, results of operations or cash flows: rates of revenue growth; traffic to the Company’s websites and mobile applications and the number of reviews and advertisers they attract; reliance on search engines and the placement and prominence in results rankings; the quality and reliability of reviews; scaling and adaptation of existing technology and network infrastructure; management of the Company’s growth; new markets and international expansion;expansion of Yelp communities; protection of the Company’s brand, reputation and intellectual property; competition in the Company’s market;industry competition; qualified employees and key personnel; intellectual property infringement and other claims; and changes in government regulation affecting the Company’s business, among other things.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates—The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; therefore, actual results could differ from management’s estimates.



Foreign Currency Translation—The consolidated financial statements of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchangesexchange rates in effect during the year. Translation adjustments are recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss, a separate component of stockholders’ equity (deficit).equity.

F-7



Table of Contents

Cash and Cash Equivalents—The Company considers all highly liquid investments, such as treasury bills, commercial paper, certificates of deposit and money market instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of amounts held in interest-bearing money market funds that were readily convertible to cash. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their carrying value.

Marketable Securities—The Company determines the classification of its marketable securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates these determinations at each balance sheet date. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost and are periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment. Amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity, and is included in interest income. Held-to-maturity securities with less than one year to maturity are included in short-term marketable securities. All other held-to-maturity securities are classified as long-term securities.

Concentrations of Credit Risk—Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with major financial institutions, which management assesses to be of high credit quality, in order to limit the exposure of each investment.

Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is dispersed due to the Company’s large number of customers. In addition, the Company’s credit risk is mitigated by the relatively short collection period. Collateral is not required for accounts receivable. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable balances. The allowance is based upon historical loss patterns, the number of days that billings are past due and an evaluation of the potential risk of loss associated with delinquent accounts. When new information becomes available to indicate that the estimate provided asfor the allowance was incorrect, an adjustment, which is considered a change in the estimate, is made. The faircarrying value of accounts receivable approximates their carryingfair value.

As of December 31, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, there were no customers that accounted for more than 10% of total accounts receivable.

The following table presents the changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands):

     Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2013     2012     2011     2016     2015     2014
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Balance, beginning of period$384$210$175$     3,208$     1,627$     810
Add: bad debt expense3,2101,91362715,91310,2716,369
Less: write-offs, net of recoveries     (2,784)     (1,739)     (592)(14,129)(8,690)(5,552)
Balance, end of period$810$384$210$4,992$3,208$1,627

Property, Equipment and Software—Property, equipment and software are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which isare approximately three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term.term or 10 years.

Website and Internal-Use Software Development Costs—CostsCosts related to website and internal-use software are primarily related to the Company’s website, including support systems. The Company capitalizes its costs to develop software when preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, management has authorized and committed project funding and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Such costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the related asset, which approximatesis generally three years. Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria, together with costs incurred for training and maintenance, are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional material functionality are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the upgrades.

F-8



Table of Contents

The Company capitalized $5.4$19.2 million, $3.2$14.7 million and $2.7$13.9 million in website and internal-use software costs during the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively, which are included in property, equipment and software, net on the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization expense related to website and internal-use software was $2.6$12.3 million, $1.9$8.4 million and $1.1$4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.



The Company wrote off $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $0.2$0.0 million of website and internal-use software costs duringin the fiscal years ended December 31, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, respectively. The retirements were related to obsolete projects no longer supported by the Company. The loss on disposition of the projects has been included in depreciation and amortization expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

Business Combinations—CombinationsThe Company accounts for acquisitions of entities that include inputs and processes and have the ability to create outputs as business combinations. The Company allocates the purchase price of the acquisition to the tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over those fair values is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related expenses and integration costs are expensed as incurred. During the measurement period, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the corresponding offset to goodwill. After the measurement period, which could be up to one year after the transaction date, subsequent adjustments are recorded to the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

Goodwill—GoodwillGoodwill represents the excess of the purchase price in a business combination over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. The carrying amountsamount of goodwill is reviewed at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. We haveThe Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of ourits single reporting operating unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test under the new authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(“FASB”). If we determinethe Company determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than itsthe carrying amount, or optopts not to not perform a qualitative assessment, then the two-step goodwill impairment test will be performed. The first step, identifying a potential impairment, compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the second step will be performed; otherwise, no further step is required. The second step, measuring the impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. Any excess of the goodwill carrying amount over the applied fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. No impairment charges have been recorded to date.

Intangible Assets—AssetsIntangible assets include acquired intangible assets identified through business combinations, which are carried at fair value less accumulated amortization, and purchased domain names,intangible assets, which are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is recorded over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 24two years to 84 months.12 years. The Company reviews amortizable intangible assets to be held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstancecircumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the lowest level of identifiable estimated undiscounted cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of any impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value. No impairment charges have been recorded to date.

Cost-Method Investments—Nonmarketable equity investments, that the Company has determined do not meet the criteria for accounting under the equity method of accounting, are accounted for using the cost method of accounting and classified as “Other non-current assets” on the consolidated balance sheets. Under the cost method, investments are carried at cost and are adjusted only for other-than-temporary declines in fair value, certain distributions and additional investments. The carrying amount of investments is reviewed if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.



Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to beBe Disposed of—The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Revenue Recognition—The Company generates revenue from localits advertising products, transactions, other services and, through the end of 2015, brand advertising and other services.advertising. The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following conditions are met: there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, service has been provided to the customer, collection of the fees is reasonably assured and the amount of fees to be paid by the customer areis fixed or determinable.determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Payments received in advance of services being rendered are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized over the requisite service period.



Local Advertising—Local. The Company generates advertising revenue is generated primarily through fixed monthly feethe display of advertising plans with local businesses for advertising placementsproducts on the Company’sits website and mobile app. Revenue is recognized ratably over the service period, net of customer discounts. TheThese arrangements are evidenced by either written and/or electronic acceptance of the Company’san agreement that stipulates the volumetypes of advertising to be delivered, the timing and the pricing.

Brand Advertising—The Company generates brand Performance-based advertising revenueplacements are priced on a cost-per-click basis through the sale of display advertisements (both graphic and text) on its website, including advertisements from leading national brands in the automobile, financial services, logistics, consumer goods and health and fitness industries.an auction, while impression-based ads are delivered pursuant to fixed monthly fee advertising plans. The Company recognizes revenue from the saledelivery of impression-based advertisements on its online networkperformance-based ads in the period of delivery and from the delivery of impression-based ads ratably over the service period, in which the advertisements (“impressions”) are delivered,each case net of customer discounts. The Company also has brandgenerates advertising revenue through indirect sales of advertising products, such as through reseller agreements that allow partners to sell Yelp Branded Profiles to their clients and the monetization of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks.

Transactions. The Company generates transactions revenue from fixed-price brand sponsorships that are recognized ratably over the service period. TheYelp Eat24, revenue-sharing partner arrangements are evidenced by insertion orders or contracts that stipulate the types of advertising to be delivered and the pricing.

Other Services—Other service revenue includes the sale of vouchers through the Company’s “Yelp Deals” and “Gift Certificates,Certificates.partnerYelp Eat24 generates revenue through arrangements relatedwith restaurants, in which restaurants pay a commission percentage fee on orders placed through the Yelp Eat24 platform. The Company records revenue associated with Yelp Eat24 transactions on a net basis. Yelp Platform partnerships provide consumers with the ability to reservationscomplete food delivery and the monetizationother transactions through third parties directly on Yelp. The Company earns a fee on Platform partnerships for acting as an agent for these transactions, which it record on a net basis and include in revenue upon completion of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks.a transaction. Yelp Deals allow merchants to promote themselves and offer discounted goods and services on a real-time basis to consumers directly on the Company’s website and mobile app and, until the quarter ended December 31, 2011, via email.app. The Company earns a fee on Yelp Deals for acting as an agent in these transactions, which are recorded on a net basis and included in revenue upon sale of the deal. The Company records a sales allowance for potential Yelp DealDeals refunds based on the Company’s estimate of future refunds. Gift Certificates allow merchants to sell full-priced gift certificates directly to customersconsumers through their business profile page.listing pages. The Company earns a fee based on the amount of the Gift Certificate sold, which it records on a net basis and includeincludes in revenue upon a consumer’s purchase of the Gift Certificate.

Brand Advertising.Through the end of 2015, the Company generated brand advertising revenue through the sale of graphic and text display advertisements on its website. The Company recognized revenue from the sale of impression-based advertisements on its online network in the period in which the advertisements (“impressions”) were delivered, net of customer discounts. The Company also generated brand revenue from fixed-price brand sponsorships that were recognized ratably over the service period. The arrangements were evidenced by insertion orders or contracts that stipulate the types of advertising delivered and the pricing.

Other Services. The Company generates other revenue through various partnership agreements on a transaction-by-transaction basis. Reservation revenuesubscription services, such as sales of monthly subscriptions to its Yelp Reservations product, licensing payments for access to Yelp data and promotional certificatesother non-advertising, non-transaction partnerships. Subscription revenues are recognized ratably over the contract terms beginning on a transaction-by-transaction basis.the commencement date of each contract, which is the date the service is made available to customers.

Multiple-Element Arrangements.Multiple Element Arrangements. The Company enters into arrangements with its customers to sell advertising packages that include different media placements or ad services that are delivered at the same time, or within close proximity of one another.



     Beginning on January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new authoritative guidance on multiple element arrangements, using the prospective method for all arrangements entered into or materially modified from the dateTable of adoption. Under this new guidance, theContents

The Company allocates arrangement consideration in multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements at the inception of anthe arrangement to all deliverables or those packages in which all components of the package are delivered at the same time, based on the relative selling price method in accordance with the selling price hierarchy, which includes: (1) vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), if available; (2) third-party evidence (“TPE”), if VSOE is not available; and (3) best estimate of selling price (“BESP”), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

VSOE.VSOE—The Company determines VSOE based on its historical pricing and discounting practices for the specific product or service when sold separately. In determining VSOE, the Company requires that a substantial majority of the standalone selling prices for these services fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. Theprice range; however, the Company has not historically sold a large volume of transactionsadvertising products on a standalone basis. As a result, the Company has not been able to establish VSOE for any of its advertising products.

TPE.TPE—When VSOE cannot be established for deliverables in multiple element arrangements, the Company applies judgment with respect to whether it can establish a selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar deliverables when sold separately. Generally, the Company’s go-to-market strategy differs from that of its peers and its offerings contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of services cannot be obtained. Furthermore, the Company is unable to reliably determine what similar competitor services’ selling prices are on a standalone basis. As a result, the Company has not been able to establish selling price based on TPE.



BESP.BESP—When it is unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, the Company uses BESP in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the service were sold on a standalone basis. BESP is generally used to allocate the selling price to deliverables in the Company’s multiple element arrangements. The Company determines BESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices it charges for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape and pricing practices. The Company limits the amount of allocable arrangement consideration to amounts that are fixed or determinable and that are not contingent on future performance or future deliverables. The Company will regularly review BESP. Changes in assumptions or judgments or changes to the elements in the arrangement could cause a material increase or decrease in the amount of revenue that the Company reports in a particular period.

The Company recognizes the relative fair value of the media placements or ad services as they are delivered assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met. As a result of implementing this recent authoritative guidance, the Company’s revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was not materially different from what would have been recognized under the previous guidance for multiple-element arrangements.

Cost of Revenue—The Company’s cost of revenue primarily consists of credit card processing fees, web hosting, Internet service costs and salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation expense for its infrastructure teams related to operating the Company’s website and mobile app. It also includes food delivery related costs as well as creative design for brand advertising and video production expenses. All costs are expensed when incurred.

Stock-Based CompensationWe accountThe Company accounts for share-basedstock-based employee compensation plans under the fair value recognition and measurement provisions in accordance with applicable accounting standards, which require all share-basedstock-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, restricted stock awards, (“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and our employee stock purchase planissuances under its 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (“ESPP”), to be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the awards.

     Share-basedPrior to January 1, 2016, stock-based compensation expense iswas recorded net of estimated forfeitures in the Company’s consolidated statements of income (loss) and, accordingly, iswas recorded for only those share-basedstock-based awards that the Company expectsexpected to vest. The Company estimatesestimated the forfeiture rate based on historical forfeitures of equity awards and adjustsadjusted the rate to reflect changes in facts and circumstances, if any. The Company will reviserevised its estimated forfeiture rate if actual forfeitures differdiffered from its initial estimates.

Effective as of January 1, 2016, the Company adopted a change in accounting policy in accordance with Accounting Standards Update 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)” (“ASU 2016-09”) to account for forfeitures as they occur. The change was applied on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of $1.1 million (which reduced the accumulated deficit) as of January 1, 2016. No prior periods were recast as a result of this change in accounting policy.



Table of Contents

Advertising Expenses—Advertising expensescosts are expensed as incurred.in the period in which the advertising takes place. Costs of producing advertising are expensed in the period in which production takes place. Total advertising expenses incurred were $1.3$46.9 million, $0.7$30.9 million and $0.5$8.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

Comprehensive lossIncome (Loss)The Company reports by major components and, as a single total, the change in its net assets during the period from non-owner sources. Comprehensive lossincome (loss) consists of net lossincome (loss) and accumulated other comprehensive loss,income (loss), which includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from net loss.income (loss). Specifically, it includes foreign currency translation adjustments.

Income Taxes—The Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, generally all expected future events other than enactments or changes in the tax law or rates are considered. Valuation allowances are provided when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expectedthat is more likely than not to be realized.

The Company operates in various tax jurisdictions and is subject to audit by various tax authorities. The Company provides for tax contingencies whenever it is deemed probable that a tax asset has been impaired or a tax liability has been incurred for events such as tax claims or changes in tax laws. Tax contingencies are based upon their technical merits, relative tax law and the specific facts and circumstances as of each reporting period. Changes in facts and circumstances could result in material changes to the amounts recorded for such tax contingencies.

The Company recognizes thea tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.



Stock Split—OnEffective as of January 25, 2012,1, 2016, the Company’s boardCompany early adopted a change in accounting policy in accordance with ASU 2016-09, which eliminated the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized as a reduction in current taxes payable before the associated tax benefit could be recognized as an increase in paid in capital. Under ASU 2016-09, these previously unrecognized deferred tax assets were recognized on a modified retrospective basis as of directors approved a 1-for-4 reverse stock splitJanuary 1, 2016, the start of the Company’s common stock.year in which the Company early adopted ASU 2016-09. The reverse stock split became effective on February 2, 2012. Upon the effectivenessU.S. federal and state net operating losses and credits recognized as of the reverse stock split, (i) every four shares of outstanding common stock was decreased to one share of common stock, (ii) the number of shares of common stock into which each outstanding warrant or option to purchase common stock is exercisable was proportionally decreased on a 1-for-4 basis, (iii) the exercise price of each outstanding warrant or option to purchase common stock was proportionately increased on a 1-for-4 basis and (iv) the conversion ratio for each share of preferred stock outstanding was proportionately reduced on a 1-for-4 basis. All of the share numbers, share prices and exercise pricesJanuary 1, 2016, as described above, have been adjusted within these financial statements,offset by a valuation allowance. As a result, only the Ireland net operating losses resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of $0.2 million (which reduced the accumulated deficit) as of January 1, 2016. Additionally, ASU 2016-09 addresses the presentation of excess tax benefits and employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows. The Company is now required to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity in the same manner as other cash flows related to income taxes on the statement of cash flows rather than as a retroactive basis, to reflectfinancing activity. The Company adopted this 1-for-4 reverse stock split.change prospectively.

Employee Benefit Plan—The Company sponsors a qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan covering eligible employees. Participants may contribute a portion of their annual compensation limitedup to a maximum annual amount set by the Internal Revenue Service. There were no employerService (“IRS”). Employer contributions under this plan were $3.8 million, $2.9 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011.2014, respectively.

Recently IssuedRecent Accounting StandardsPronouncements Not Yet EffectiveEffective January 1, 2013, the Company prospectively adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” This update requires companies to provide information regarding the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, companies are required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income (loss) is presented or in the accompanying notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by the respective line items of net income (loss). The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

     Effective July 1, 2013, the Company prospectively adopted ASU 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus ofMay 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task Force)(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605),and requires entities to recognize revenue when they transfer promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for such goods or services. As currently issued and amended, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, though early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In December 2016, the FASB issued guidance on Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.



Table of Contents

The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented "full retrospective", or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption- "modified retrospective". The Company expects the requirement to defer incremental contract acquisition costs and recognize them over the contract period or expected customer life will result in the recognition of a deferred charge on our balance sheets. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and the related implementation guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10)” (“ASU 2016-01”). The new standard provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. This update eliminates diversityguidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”). The new guidance generally requires an entity to recognize on its balance sheet operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets. The standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. The new standard requires a modified retrospective transition for existing leases to each prior reporting period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Subtopic 230)” (“ASU 2016-15”). The new guidance provides clarity around the cash flow classification for specific issues in practice for presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is availableeffort to reduce the taxable income or tax payable that would result from disallowancecurrent and potential future diversity in practice. The standard will be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of a tax position. Thethe adoption of thisASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Subtopic 230)” (“ASU 2016-18”). The new guidance requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The standard resulted in unrecognized tax benefits atwill be effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2013 that have reduced deferred tax assets of available same jurisdiction loss carryforwards that would be applied in settlement15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the uncertain tax position.adoption of ASU 2016-18 on its consolidated financial statements.

3. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company’s investments in money market accounts are recorded as cash equivalents at fair value in the consolidated financial statements. All other financial instruments are classified as held-to-maturity investments and, accordingly, are recorded at amortized cost; however, the Company is required to determine the fair value of these investments on a recurring basis to identify any potential impairment. The accounting guidance for fair value measurements prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value in the following hierarchy:

Level 1—Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets,

Level 2—Inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly, or

Level 3—Unobservable inputs in which there isare little or no market data, which requiresrequire the Company to develop its own assumptions.

This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures its financial assets at fair value. The Company’s investment instrumentsmoney market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted prices in active markets. The Company’s commercial paper, corporate bonds, agency bonds and agency discount notes are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they have been valued using inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable directly or indirectly.

F-13



Table of Contents

The following table represents the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

     December 31, 2013December 31, 2012
Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total
Money market funds(1)$     360,690     360,690$     87,262$     87,262

(1) Included in cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated balance sheets.


December 31, 2016December 31, 2015
    Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total    Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total
Cash Equivalents:
       Money market funds$     152,423$     -$     -$     152,423$     86,660$     -$     -$     86,660
       Agency bonds-----4,999-4,999
Marketable Securities:
       Commercial paper-45,894-45,894-36,981-36,981
       Corporate bonds-9,006-9,006-18,024-18,024
       Agency bonds-152,394-152,394-132,102-132,102
       Agency discount notes-----11,986-11,986
Total cash equivalents and marketable securities$152,423$207,294$-$359,717$86,660$204,092$-$290,752

4. MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of securities held-to-maturity, all of which mature within one year, as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

As of December 31, 2016
GrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealized
     Amortized Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value
Short-term marketable securities:
       Commercial paper$45,894$-$            -$45,894
       Corporate bonds9,009-(3)9,006
       Agency bonds152,42918(53)152,394
Total marketable securities$207,332$18$(56)$207,294
 
As of December 31, 2015
GrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealized
     Amortized Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value
Short-term marketable securities:
       Commercial paper$36,981$-$            -$36,981
       Corporate bonds18,0272(5)18,024
       Agency bonds132,224-(122)132,102
       Agency discount notes11,9824-11,986
Total marketable securities$199,214$6$(127)$199,093



Table of Contents

The following tables present gross unrealized losses and fair values for those securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, aggregated by investment category and the length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous loss position (in thousands):

As of December 31, 2016
Less Than 12 Months12 Months or GreaterTotal
     Fair Value     Unrealized Loss     Fair Value     Unrealized Loss     Fair Value     Unrealized Loss
Corporate bonds$     8,006$                    (3)$     -$     -$     8,006$                    (3)
Agency bonds92,018(53)--92,018(53)
Total$100,024$(56)$-$-$100,024$(56)
 
As of December 31, 2015
Less Than 12 Months12 Months or GreaterTotal
     Fair Value     Unrealized Loss     Fair Value     Unrealized Loss     Fair Value     Unrealized Loss
Corporate bonds$     10,021$                    (5)$     -$-$     10,021$                    (5)
Agency bonds127,102(122)--127,102(122)
Total$137,123$(127)$-$-$137,123$(127)

The Company periodically reviews its investment portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment. The Company considers such factors as the duration, severity and reason for the decline in value, and the potential recovery period. The Company also considers whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis, and whether the amortized cost basis cannot be recovered as a result of credit losses. During the three months and year ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairment loss.

5. ACQUISITIONS

SeatMe, Inc.2015 Acquisition

On July 24, 2013,February 9, 2015, the Company acquired SeatMe,Eat24Hours.com, Inc. (“SeatMe”). In connection with the acquisition, all of the outstanding capital stock and options to purchase capital stock of SeatMe wereEat24 was converted into the right to receive an aggregate of approximately $2.2$75.0 million in cash, less certain transaction expenses, and 260,9011,402,844 shares of Yelp Class A common stock with an aggregate fair value of approximately $9.7$59.2 million, as determined on the basis of the closing market price of the Company’s Class A common stock on the acquisition date. Of the total consideration paid in connection with the acquisition, $0.1$16.5 million in cash and 31,236308,626 shares of Yelp Class A common stock were initially held in escrow to secure indemnification obligations. The balance remaining in the escrow fund was $3.4 million in cash as of December 31, 2016. The key factorpurpose underlying the acquisition was securing the technology to provideobtain an online reservations directly throughfood ordering solution to drive daily engagement in the Company’s website with minimal product and engineering work.key restaurant vertical.



Table of Contents

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, Business“Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”), with the results of SeatMe’sEat24’s operations included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements starting on July 24, 2013.from February 9, 2015. The following table summarizes the consideration paid for SeatMe and the preliminary allocation of theinitial purchase price based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition dateallocation was as follows (in thousands):

     July 24, 2013     February 9, 2015
Fair value of purchase consideration:
Cash:
Distributed to SeatMe equity holders$2,057
Distributed to Eat24 stockholders$               56,624
Held in escrow account5616,500
Payable on behalf of Eat24 stockholders1,876
Total cash75,000
Class A common stock:
Distributed to SeatMe equity holders8,420
Distributed to Eat24 stockholders46,143
Held in escrow account1,24613,015
Total purchase consideration$     11,779$134,158
Fair value of net assets acquired:
Cash and Cash Equivalents$56
Property and equipment47
Cash and cash equivalents$1,578
Intangibles1,44039,600
Goodwill10,279110,927
Other assets1176,031
Total assets acquired11,939158,136
Deferred tax liability(15,207)
Other liabilities(8,771)
Total liabilities assumed160(23,978)
Net assets acquired$11,779$134,158

Estimated useful lives and the amount assigned to each class of the intangible assets acquired are shown below:as follows:

Intangible TypeUseful Life
Developed technology6 years
Customer relationships2 years
Trade name2 years
       Weighted average5.6 years
Intangible Asset Type     Amount Assigned     Useful Life
Restaurant relationships         $     17,400         12.0 years
Developed technology$7,4005.0 years
User relationships$12,0007.0 years
Trade name$2,8004.0 years
Weighted average8.6 years

The intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis, which reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are being utilized. The goodwill results from the Company’s opportunity to offerdrive daily engagement in its customersrestaurant vertical and leveragepotentially expand Eat24’s offering to the SeatMe web- and app-based reservation solution.U.S. restaurants listed on the Company’s platform. None of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.



     ForThe Company recorded no acquisition-related costs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2016 and $0.2 million in acquisition-related costs in the Company recorded acquisition-related transaction costs of approximately $0.2 million,year ended December 31, 2015, which were included in the general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statementstatements of operations.

The consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 include $39.2 million of revenue attributable to Eat24.



Table of Contents

2014 Acquisitions

In October 2014, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Yelp Ireland Ltd., acquired all of the outstanding equity interests in Cityvox SAS. Also in October 2014, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries Yelp Ireland Ltd. and Qype GmbH, acquired the assets comprising the business conducted under the name Restaurant Kritik from Kabukiman Ltd. The aggregate purchase price of these businesses was $15.3 million, net of $0.1 million cash acquired; the purchase price did not include stock in either transaction. Each of these acquisitions has been accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805, under the acquisition method. Accordingly, the aggregate purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values on the acquisition dates, and is subject to adjustment based on the purchase price adjustment provisions contained in the acquisition agreements. The results of operations of the acquired companies have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the respective acquisition dates. Net revenues, earnings since the acquisition and pro forma results of operations for this acquisitionthese acquisitions have not been presented because they are not material to the consolidated results of operations, either individually or in the aggregate.

Qype GmbH

     On October 23, 2012, During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Yelp Ireland Ltd., completedrecorded acquisition-related transaction costs of $0.6 million, which were included in general and administrative expense.

Under the Restaurant Kritik asset purchase agreement, the Company agreed to pay an additional €0.8 million ($0.9 million at the acquisition date) in consideration if the migration of all the outstanding equity interestsRestaurant Kritik’s content to Yelp was completed within one year of Qype for approximately $24.3 million in cash and Yelp Class A common stock with an approximate fair value of $23.3 million. Of the total consideration paid in connection with the acquisition $10.3 million is held in the form of cash in escrow to secure indemnification obligations.date. The balance remaining in the escrow fund relating to this acquisition was approximately $9.5 million as of December 31, 2013. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805, with the results of Qype’s operations included in the consolidated financial statements starting on October 23, 2012. The key factors underlying the acquisition were to secure an established European market presence, obtain Qype’s content and traffic and the opportunity for expansion.

     The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Qype and the preliminary allocation of the purchase price, based on the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed atcontingent consideration was approximately $0.8 million as of the acquisition date and the Company paid $0.8 million in the three months ended December 31, 2015 in satisfaction of this liability.

The following table presents the aggregate purchase price allocations of these individually immaterial acquisitions recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets of their acquisition dates (in thousands):

     October 23, 2012
Fair value of purchase consideration:
              Cash consideration$14,020
              Cash in escrow account10,276
       Fair value of Class A common stock23,254
                     Total purchase consideration$47,550
 
Fair value of net assets acquired:
              Cash$172
              Accounts receivable1,237
              Other current assets1,239
              Property and equipment233
              Intangibles6,134
              Goodwill48,056
                     Total assets acquired57,071
              Accounts payable2,169
              Accrued liabilities4,858
              Deferred revenue1,190
       Debt1,304
                     Total liabilities assumed9,521
                            Net assets acquired$     47,550
Net tangible assets     $     (277)
Goodwill13,995
Intangible assets1,546
       Total purchase price (excluding contingent consideration)15,264
Contingent consideration826
       Total purchase price$16,090

     The fair valueEstimated useful lives as of the 968,919 shares of Class A common stock issued as partacquisition dates of the consideration paid for Qype was determined on the basis of the closing market price of the Company’s Class A common stock on the acquisition date. The total weighted-average amortization period for intangible assets is 3.6 years. acquired are as follows:

Intangible TypeUseful Life
Content5.0 years
Developed technology0.5 years
Trade name2.0 years
       Weighted average4.3 years

The intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis, which reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are being utilized. The goodwill results fromrepresents the Company’s opportunityexcess value over both tangible and intangible assets acquired. The goodwill in these transactions is primarily attributable to expand its geographic footprint in Europe, the future revenue opportunities that the Company expects to achieve from leveraging Qype’s content to attract more traffic and users to its website and ultimately to acquire more advertisers.the opportunity for expansion. None of the goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.



    Estimated useful lives of the intangible assets acquired are shown below:

Intangible TypeUseful Life
Content5 years
Advertiser relationships2 years
Developed technology2 years
Trade name2 years

    For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded acquisition-related transaction costs of approximately $1.0 million, which were included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

    Refer to Note 13 regarding the tax effect of the acquisition on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

    The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations for the Company and Qype, and includes the accounting effects resulting from the acquisition, including transaction, restructuring and integration costs, amortization charges from acquired intangible assets, and changes in depreciation due to differing asset values and depreciation lives as though the companies were combined as of January 1, 2012. The unaudited pro forma financial information, as presented below, is for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place as of January 1, 2012 (in thousands, except per share data):

Pro Forma for the 
Year Ended 
December 31, 
     2012 
Revenue$             146,265
Net loss  (23,186)
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders$(0.42)

    In October 2012, following the acquisition of Qype, the Company announced its plan to reduce the size of the Qype workforce and terminate several of Qype’s leases. These actions were made in order to reduce the Company’s cost structure, enhance operating efficiencies and strengthen the Company’s business to achieve longterm profitable growth. As a result of this plan, the Company incurred restructuring charges during the fourth quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013, which were included in the restructuring and integration costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for such periods. Restructuring liabilities were $0.1 million as of December 31, 2013, and are included in accrued liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s restructuring plan was substantially completed during the year ended December 31, 2013. Any additional expense related to this restructuring plan incurred in the future is expected to be immaterial. The Company has recorded restructuring charges of $1.9 million through December 31, 2013. The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s restructuring liabilities (in thousands):

Balance as of January 1, 2013     $    685
Provision 935
Adjustment to provision (261)
Payments(1,308)
Balance as of December 31, 2013$51

F-15F-17



Table of Contents

5.6. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012 consist2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):

December 31,December 31,December 31,
     2013     2012     2016     2015
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash$    29,074$    7,862$       119,778$     79,954
Money market funds  360,690 87,262152,42391,659
Total cash and cash equivalents$389,764$95,124$272,201$171,613

The lease agreements for certain of the Company’s offices require the Company to maintain letters of credit issued to the landlords of each facility. The lettersEach letter of credit areis subject to renewal annually until the leases expire.applicable lease expires and is collateralized by restricted cash. As of December 31, 20132016 and December 31, 2012,2015, the Company had letters of credit totaling $3.2$17.3 million and $6.4$16.5 million, respectively, related to such leases.leases, which are classified as restricted cash.

6.7. PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE, NET

Property, equipment and software, net as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012 consist2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):

December 31, December 31,December 31,
     2013      2012      2016     2015
Computer equipment$    13,348$    8,315$          28,551$          26,004
Software5414331,0791,213
Capitalized website and internally developed software costs13,8788,653
Capitalized website and internal-use software development costs61,51542,320
Furniture and fixtures4,3882,61314,16210,771
Leasehold improvements13,9845,01760,10147,552
Telecommunication 2,179 1,5703,4572,970
Total48,31826,601168,865130,830
Less accumulated depreciation (17,652) (11,802)(76,425)(50,363)
Property, equipment and software, net$30,666$14,799$92,440$80,467

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 was approximately $7.9$28.5 million, $5.9$23.0 million and $4.2$14.3 million, respectively.



Table of Contents

7.8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The Company’s goodwill is the result of the acquisitionits acquisitions of Qype on October 23, 2012 and the acquisition of SeatMe on July 24, 2013,other businesses, and represents the excess of purchase consideration over the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and concluded that goodwill was not impaired, as the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value.

Goodwill allocated as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the fiscal years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012 are2015, were as follows (in thousands):

Balance as of January 1, 2012     $    
Balance as of December 31, 2014$     67,307
Goodwill measurement period adjustment(255)
Goodwill acquired48,056110,927
Effect of currency translation549(5,782)
Balance as of December 31, 2012$48,605
Goodwill acquired10,279
Measurement period adjustment(1,153)
Balance as of December 31, 2015$172,197
Goodwill measurement period adjustment146
Effect of currency translation 1,959(1,676)
Balance as of December 31, 2013$59,690 
Balance as of December 31, 2016$170,667

    Under the terms of the share purchase agreement by and among the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary Yelp Ireland Ltd., Qype and its shareholders, the Qype purchase price was subject to a post-closing adjustment based on Qype’s net working capital as of the acquisition date. On April 15, 2013, Yelp and the former Qype shareholders agreed to an adjustment of the purchase price in favor of Yelp in the amount of €0.9 million (approximately $1.2 million as of April 15, 2013) based on Qype’s net working capital as of the acquisition date. Asthis agreement occurred during the measurement period of the acquisition, as defined by ASC 805, the impact of this adjustment was recorded as an increase to cash and a decrease to goodwill. The related funds were released to the Company from the escrow fund during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

F-16



    The intangibleIntangible assets detail at December 31, 20132016 and 2012 consist2015 consisted of the following (in(dollars in thousands):

WeightedWeighted
GrossNetAverageGrossNetAverage
CarryingAccumulated CarryingRemainingCarryingAccumulatedCarryingRemaining
     Amount     Amortization      Amount     Life      Amount      Amortization      Amount      Life
December 31, 2013:
December 31, 2016
Restaurant and user relationships$29,400$         (5,981)$23,4198.2 years
Developed technology9,280(4,122)5,1583.1 years
Content$    3,413$    (811)$     2,6023.8 years3,674(2,581)1,0932.0 years
Trade name and other3,338(1,861)1,4772.1 years
Domains and data licenses2,804(1,340)1,4643.0 years
Advertiser relationships2,045(1,214)8312.0 years1,549(1,549)-0.0 years
Developed technology1,851(422)1,4294.8 years
Trade name and other553(276)2771.1 years
Domains250(154)963.9 years
Total$50,045$(17,434)$32,611
$8,112$(2,877)$5,235
Weighted
WeightedGrossNetAverage
GrossNetAverageCarryingAccumulatedCarryingRemaining
CarryingAccumulated CarryingRemainingAmountAmortizationAmountLife
AmountAmortization AmountLife
December 31, 2012:
December 31, 2015:
Restaurant and user relationships$    29,400$       (2,817)$    26,5839.1 years
Developed technology9,295(2,441)6,8544.1 years
Content$3,304$(126)$3,1784.8 years3,922(2,066)1,8562.7 years
Trade name and other3,350(1,139)2,2113.1 years
Domains and data licenses2,625(835)1,7903.9 years
Advertiser relationships1,982(188)1,7941.8 years1,708(1,708)-0.0 years
Developed technology 529 (51)4781.8 years
Trade name and other 396(38) 358 1.8 years
Domains246(118) 1284.6 years
$6,457 $(521)$5,936
Total$50,300$(11,006)$39,294


Table of Contents

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 20112014 was approximately $2.3$6.8 million, $0.4$6.5 million and zero,$2.4 million, respectively. Amortization expense related to developed technology is included in depreciation and amortization expense in

As of December 31, 2016, the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

    Estimatedestimated future amortization of purchased intangible assets at December 31, 2013 wasfor (i) each of the succeeding five years and (ii) thereafter is as follows (in thousands):

Year ending December 31,Amount
2014     $    2,226
2015  958
2016916
2017 783
2018 and thereafter352
Total amortization$5,235
Year Ending December 31,Amount
2017$     6,763
20186,280
20195,399
20203,406
20213,166
Thereafter 7,597
Total amortization$32,611

9. OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS

Other non-current assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):

    December 31,    December 31,
20162015
Cost-method investments$8,000$-
Other2,9923,701
       Total$10,992$3,701

F-17F-20



Table of Contents

Cost-method investments represent the Company’s investment in the preferred stock of Nowait, Inc. a mobile platform that allows restaurants to manage their waitlists, which was completed on July 15, 2016. The remaining other non-current assets are primarily deferred tax assets.

8.10. ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012 consist2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):

December 31,
     2013     2012
Accrued vacation and employee related expenses$    4,734$    2,463
Accrued bonus and commissions3,7072,037
Deferred rent298362
Accrued value added taxes payable871,260
Legal settlement accrual2,167
Accrued payroll tax1,508845
Merchant revenue share liability932538
Accrued restructuring and integration51710
Fixed asset purchase commitments 2,247  383
Other accrued expenses5,4404,209
       Total $19,004$14,974
      December 31,      December 31,
20162015
Restaurant revenue share liability$17,372$12,654
Accrued employee vacation6,1964,662
Accrued income, payroll and other taxes5,4563,451
Accrued marketing4,6332,144
Accrued employee benefits and other employee expenses4,3373,631
Accrued bonuses and commissions3,0794,546
Accrued facilities and related2,4271,928
Accrued consulting1,8241,763
Deferred rent1,655786
Employee stock purchase plan liability1,059817
Merchant revenue share liability9801,212
Fixed asset purchase commitments7231,318
Other accrued expenses5,3414,546
       Total$55,082$43,458

     Subsequent to the issuance11. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

Long-term liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the Company’s 2012 consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded an immaterial correction in the classification of certain balances within accrued liabilities which has been reflected in the table above (see Note 16).following (in thousands):

      December 31,      December 31,
20162015
Deferred rent$16,896$11,324
Other long-term liabilities725706
       Total$17,621$12,030

9.12. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET

Other income (expense), net as offor the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011 consist2014 consisted of the following (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
      2016      2015      2014
(in thousands)
Interest income, net$     1,724$     622$     375
Transaction loss on foreign exchange(175)(687)(121)
Other non-operating income (loss), net145451(33)
       Other income, net$1,694$386$221



Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31, 
     2013      2012      2011 
Interest income$    62$    51$    13
Transaction gains (losses), net on foreign exchange(251)(259)(393)
Other non-operating loss, net  (218)  (18) (15)
       Other income (expense), net$(407)$(226)$(395)

10.13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Office Facility LeaseLeases—The Company leases its office facilities under operating lease agreements that expire from 20142017 to 2021.2025. Certain lease agreements provide for rental payments on a graduated basis. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period.

    On May 9, 2012, the Company entered into an office lease (the “Lease”) to lease space for its corporate headquarters located in San Francisco, California from Stockbridge 138 New Montgomery LLC (the “Landlord”). Pursuant to the Lease, the Company will lease premises containing 110,412 square feet of space at 140 New Montgomery Street for a term of eight years beginning October 1, 2013.

Rental expense was $8.7$36.8 million, $4.8$30.9 million and $2.4$14.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

Aggregate Future Lease CommitmentsThe Company’s minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases for equipment and office space having initial terms in excess of one year arewere as follows atas of December 31, 20132016 (in thousands):

Operating
Year Ending December 31,     Leases
              2014$    15,275
              201517,366
              201615,182
              201714,091
              2018  12,705
       Thereafter28,481
Total minimum lease payments$103,100

F-18


Operating
Year Ending December 31,           Leases
2017$     42,321
201844,355
2019 44,449
202045,892
202138,095
Thereafter92,401
Total minimum lease payments$307,513

The Company has subleased certain office facilities under operating lease agreements that expire in 2021. The Company recognizes sublease rentals as a reduction in rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period. Sublease rental income was $2.0 million, $1.4 million, and zero for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. The Company expects future sublease rental receipts of $8.3 million between 2017 and 2021.

Legal Proceedings—The Company is subject to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company currently does not believe that the final outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February and March 2010, the Company was sued inAugust 2014, two putative class actions on behalfaction lawsuits alleging violations of local businesses asserting various causesfederal securities laws were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of action based on claims thatCalifornia, naming as defendants the Company manipulatedand certain of its officers. The lawsuits allege violations of the ratingsExchange Act by the Company and reviews oncertain of its platform to coerce local businesses to buy its advertising products.officers for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business and operations between October 29, 2013 and April 3, 2014. These cases were subsequently consolidated and, in an action asserting claims for violationJanuary 2015, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint seeking unspecified monetary damages and other relief. Following the court’s dismissal of the California Business & Professions Code, extortion and attempted extortion basedconsolidated complaint on April 21, 2015, the conduct they allege and seeking monetary relief in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. In October 2011,plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint on May 21, 2015. On November 24, 2015, the court dismissed this consolidated actionthe first amended complaint with prejudice.prejudice, and entered judgment in the Company’s favor on December 28, 2015. The plaintiffs have appealed this decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which heardCircuit.

On April 23, 2015, a putative class action lawsuit was filed by former Eat24 employees in the appeal on July 11, 2013. The Ninth Circuit has not yet issued a decision. Accordingly,Superior Court of California for San Francisco County, naming as defendants the Company is currently unableand Eat24. The lawsuit asserts that the defendants failed to reasonably estimate eitherpermit meal and rest periods for certain current and former employees working as Eat24 customer support specialists, and alleges violations of the probabilityCalifornia Labor Code, applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders and the California Business and Professions Code. The plaintiffs seek monetary damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. On May 29, 2015, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint asserting an additional cause of incurringaction for penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act. In January 2016, the Company reached a loss or an estimated rangepreliminary agreement to settle this matter, which the court preliminarily approved on June 27, 2016. The settlement received final court approval on December 5, 2016 and the $550 thousand settlement amount was paid on February 10, 2017.

F-22



Table of such loss, if any, from this appeal.Contents

    Qype, the Company’s indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, is party toOn June 24, 2015, a former Eat24 sales employee filed a lawsuit, regarding fees payable for directory data that Qypeon behalf of herself and its predecessor purchased from Deutsche Telekom AG (“Deutsche Telekom”) between 2005a putative class of current and 2008 at a rate set by the German Federal Network Agency (“FNA”). Following German court decisions overturning the rate set by the FNA, Deutsche Telekom sued Qypeformer Eat24 sales employees, against Eat24 in the RegionalSuperior Court of BonnCalifornia for San Francisco County. The lawsuit alleges that Eat24 failed to pay required wages, including overtime wages, allow meal and rest periods and maintain proper records, and asserts causes of action under the California Labor Code, applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders and the California Business and Professions Code. The plaintiff seeks monetary damages and penalties in unspecified amounts, as well as injunctive relief. On August 3, 2015, the plaintiff filed a first amended complaint asserting an additional cause of action for penalties under the Private Attorneys General Act. In January 2016, the Company reached a preliminary agreement to settle this matter for payments in the aggregate amount of up to approximately $0.2 million, which the court preliminarily approved on August 26, 201029, 2016. The settlement received final court approval on February 1, 2017.

Based on the settlement agreements reached in connection with the two lawsuits by former Eat24 employees described above, the Company recognized a liability for approximately €1.5each of the proposed settlement amounts as part of its accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2016. In February 2016, $1.1 million plus interest for additional fees for data delivered between 2005 and 2008. In August 2011, the court rejected Deutsche Telekom’s claim in full and Deutsche Telekom appealed the decisionwas released to the Higher Regional CourtCompany from the escrow fund established in connection with the acquisition of Cologne, which referred the appealEat24, to the Higher Regional Court in Düsseldorf in July 2012. Following a hearing in April 2013, the Higher Regional Court denied Deutsche Telekom’s appeal,fund such settlement amounts and Deutsche Telekom did not challenge this decision. In August 2013, Deutsche Telekom filed a claim against Qype in the Regional Court of Cologne seeking approximately €441,900 in additional data service fees, plus interest, for data delivered in 2009, which it subsequently withdrew in November 2013.

In addition, we are subject torelated legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we currently do not believe that the final outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.expenses.

Indemnification Agreements—In the ordinary course of business, the Company may provide indemnifications of varying scope and terms to customers, vendors, lessors, business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of breach of such agreements, services to be provided by the Company or from intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with directors and certain officers and employees that will require the Company to, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors, officers or employees.

While the outcome of these mattersclaims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that the outcome of any claims under the indemnification arrangements will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Payroll Tax Audit—In June 2015, the IRS began a payroll tax audit of the Company for 2014 and 2013. The Company has assessed the estimated range of such loss and, as of December 31, 2016, a liability of $0.5 million has been recorded. The Company expects the audits and any related assessments to be finalized in 2017.

11.14. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Initial Public OfferingElimination of Dual-Class Common Stock Structure

    In March 2012, the Company completed its IPO whereby 8,172,500On September 22, 2016, all outstanding shares of the Company’s Class A common stock were sold by the Company (inclusive of 1,072,500 shares of Class A common stock from the full exercise of the overallotment option of shares granted to the underwriters) and 50,000 shares of Class A common stock were sold by a selling stockholder, The Yelp Foundation. The public offering price of the shares sold in the offering was $15.00 per share. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sales of shares by the selling stockholder. The total grossproceeds from the offering to the Company were $122.6 million. After deducting underwriters’ discounts and commissions and offering expenses, the aggregate net proceeds received by the Company totaled approximately $111.4 million. Immediately prior to the closing of the IPO, all shares of the Company’s outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock automatically converted into 35,816,772 shares of Class B common stock. As a result, following the IPO, the Company has two classes of authorized common stock outstanding: Class A common stock (one vote per share) and Class B common stock (ten votes per share).

F-19



    In November 2011,automatically converted into a single class of common stock (the “Conversion”) pursuant to the board of directors of the Company approved the establishment of The Yelp Foundation (the “Foundation”), a non-profit organization designed to support consumers and businesses in the communities in which the Company operates. The Foundation’s officers include severalterms of the Company’s current officers. The Company’s boardAmended and Restated Certificate of directors approvedIncorporation. On September 23, 2016, the Company filed a contribution and issuancecertificate with the Secretary of 520,000 sharesState of the Company’s common stock toState of Delaware effecting the Foundation,retirement and cancellation of which the Foundation has sold 75,000 shares, including 50,000 shares in the IPO. The Company recorded an expense in the amount of $5.9 million for the contribution based on the fair value of the common stock on the date the shares were issued to the Foundation. The Company recorded the expense as a charitable contribution expense as it constituted an unconditional transfer of assets to an entity in a voluntary nonreciprocal transfer.

    The Company has not consolidated the Foundation as (1) the Company does not have a financial interest in the Foundation, (2) the Company does not have voting rights and (3) the Foundation meets the definition of a non-profit organization under ASC 810-20, Consolidation – Control of Partnerships and Similar Entities as it is organized exclusively for charitable, scientific, literary and educational purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is governed by Section 5211(b) of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law.

Follow-on Offering

    In October 2013, the Company closed its follow-on offering of 4,312,500 shares of its Class A common stock (inclusiveand Class B common stock. This certificate of 562,500retirement had the additional effect of eliminating the authorized Class A and Class B shares, thereby reducing the Company’s total number of Class Aauthorized shares of common stock from the full exercise500,000,000 to 200,000,000.

F-23



Table of the overallotment option of shares granted to the underwriters). The public offering price of the shares sold in the offering was $67.00 per share. The total gross proceeds from the offering to the Company were $288.9 million. After deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company, the aggregate net proceeds received by the Company totaled approximately $276.5 million.Contents

The following table presents the number of shares authorized and issued and outstanding as of the periods presented:dates indicated:

December 31, 2013December 31, 2012December 31, 2016December 31, 2015
SharesSharesSharesShares
SharesIssued andSharesIssued andSharesIssued andSharesIssued and
     Authorized     Outstanding     Authorized     Outstanding     Authorized     Outstanding     Authorized     Outstanding
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, $0.000001 par value200,000,00059,163,134 200,000,000 23,380,283200,000,00066,535,156
Class B common stock, $0.000001 par value100,000,000 11,711,359100,000,00040,124,986100,000,0009,447,646
Common stock, $0.000001 par value 200,000,000200,000,000200,000,00079,429,833200,000,000
Undesignated Preferred Stock10,000,00010,000,00010,000,00010,000,000

Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance

As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company had reserved shares of common stock for future issuances in connection with the following:

Options outstanding:outstanding11,101,1668,018,941
Restricted stock units and awards outstanding443,6037,090,465
Available for future stock option and restricted stock units and awards under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, as amendedgrants2,526,3002,787,277
Available for future issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase PlanESPP offerings2,238,2051,303,913
Total reserved for future issuance16,309,27419,200,596

F-20



Equity Incentive Plans

The Company has outstanding awards under three equity incentive plans: the Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”), the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) and the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2012 Plan”). In July 2011, the Company adopted the 2011 Plan, terminated the 2005 Plan and provided that no further stock awards were to be granted under the 2005 Plan. All outstanding stock awards under the 2005 Plan will continue to be governed by their existing terms. Upon the effectiveness of the underwriting agreement in connection with the IPO,Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”), the Company terminated the 2011 Plan and all shares that were reserved under the 2011 Plan but not issued were assumed by the 2012 Plan. No further awards will be granted pursuant to the 2011 Plan. All outstanding stock awards under the 2011 Plan will continue to be governed by their existing terms. Under the 2012 Plan, the Company has the ability to issue incentive stock options, (“ISOs”), non-statutory stock options, (“NSOs”), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance units and/orand performance shares. Additionally, the 2012 Plan provides for the grant of performance cash awards to employees, directors and consultants.

Stock Options

Stock options granted under the 2012 Plan will beare granted at a price per share not less than the fair value of a share of the Company’s common stock at date of grant. Options granted to date generally vest either over a four-year period, withon one of three schedules: (a) 25% vesting at the end of one year and the remaining shares vesting monthly thereafter or over a four-year period withthereafter; (b) 10% vesting over the first year, 20% vesting over the second year, 30% vesting over the third year and 40% vesting over the fourth year.year; or (c) ratably on a monthly basis. Options granted are generally are exercisable for up to 10 years. The Company issues new shares when stock options are exercised.

F-24



Table of Contents

A summary of stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 20132016 is as follows:

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
ContractualAggregate
TermIntrinsic Value
     Options Outstanding     (in years)     (in thousands)
Weighted-
Average
Number of Exercise
Shares      Price
Options outstanding—December 31, 201210,113,176$    10.007.89$    96,992
Granted4,420,30229.72
Exercised(2,648,121)5.12
Canceled(784,191)21.03
Options outstanding—December 31, 201311,101,166$18.248.17$562,855
  
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 201310,456,258  $17.718.12$535,767
Options vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2013 3,866,336$9.34 7.19 $230,476
Options Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Weighted-RemainingAggregate
AverageContractualIntrinsic
Number ofExerciseTerm (inValue (in
     Shares     Price     years)     thousands)
Outstanding - December 31, 20158,206,356$20.936.44$92,454
Granted1,341,25023.58
Exercised   (1,290,205)15.95
Canceled(238,460)36.59
Outstanding - December 31, 20168,018,941$21.716.10$147,673
Options vested and exercisable as of December 31, 20166,292,994$19.185.44$128,488

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Company’s estimated fair valueclosing price of itsthe Company’s common stock and the exercise price of outstanding, in-the-money options. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $90.7$23.23 million, $31.3$26.2 million and $10.3$108.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted was $16.75, $0.72$10.16, $22.48 and $4.48$41.84 per share for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, respectively.

As of December 31, 2013,2016, total unrecognized compensation costs adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock options was approximately $80.1$21 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average time period of 2.762.2 years.

F-21



The following table summarizes information about outstanding and vested stock options as of December 31, 2013:2016:

Options OutstandingOptions Vested and Exercisable
Weighted
AverageWeightedWeighted
Number ofRemainingAverageAverage
Exercise PriceOptionsLifeExerciseNumber ofExercise
Range     Outstanding     (Years)     Price     Options     Price
$0.20 – $6.92411,4295.69$    4.04366,445$        3.71
$7.163,727,2937.017.16         2,556,6337.16
$8.16 – $18.851,591,8168.1213.61470,09411.68
$18.91 – $21.13379,4479.1620.2757,16619.96
$21.181,840,0009.1021.18204,16421.18
$21.24 – $26.031,518,2328.98 24.66142,58324.32
$26.89 – $41.801,132,3899.3432.5268,63328.87
$51.98 – $66.80391,2859.7061.69 61866.18
$67.7592,1759.83 67.75 
$68.9517,100 10.0068.95
Total11,101,1668.17$18.243,866,336$9.34
Options Vested and
Options OutstandingExercisable
Weighted-WeightedWeighted
Number ofAverageAverageAverage
OptionsRemainingExerciseNumber ofExercise
Exercise Price Range      Outstanding      Life (Years)      Price      Options      Price
$1.00 - $6.9288,8162.86$4.4884,649$4.45
$7.162,196,6344.017.162,196,6347.16
$8.16 - $18.85803,3435.6515.43728,69615.04
$18.91 - $21.13 733,5219.0620.53280,55120.55
$21.18 1,533,8036.1021.181,437,80121.18
$21.24 - $26.03936,2346.9524.01606,25625.02
$26.89 - $45.50890,6377.0831.49565,51932.46
$47.79 - $78.18818,0287.7356.18382,09760.02
$82.429,0257.3379.064,48879.21
$94.428,9007.1694.426,30394.42
Total8,018,9416.10$21.716,292,994$19.18

F-25



Table of Contents

RSUs and RSAs

     The Company began granting RSAs to its employees in July 2011. In March 2012, the Company began granting RSUs. The cost of RSUs and RSAs and RSUs areis determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. RSAsRSUs and RSUsRSAs generally vest over a four-year period, withon one of three schedules: (a) 25% vesting at the end of one year and the remaining vesting quarterly or annually thereafter.thereafter; (b) 10% vesting over the first year, 20% vesting over the second year, 30% vesting over the third year and 40% vesting over the fourth year; or (c) ratably on a quarterly basis.

A summary of restricted stock unitsRSU and restricted stock awardsRSA activity for the year ended December 31, 20132016 is as follows:

Restricted Stock UnitsRestricted Stock AwardsRestricted Stock UnitsRestricted Stock Awards
Weighted-Weighted-NumberWeighted-
AverageWeighted-AverageNumber ofAverage GrantofAverage Grant
Number of Grant DateNumber of Grant Date Fair     Shares     Date Fair Value     Shares     Date Fair Value
     Shares      Fair Value     Shares      Value
Unvested—December 31, 2012     283,630$    23.30     115,971$    9.39
Unvested--December 31, 20154,093,204$39.45312$11.68
Granted330,73253.335,879,39028.51--
Released(103,637) 24.42 (42,501)9.36(1,813,712)35.29(312)11.68
Canceled (67,122) 23.44       (1,068,417)32.92--
Unvested—December 31, 2013443,603$44.6673,470$9.41
Unvested--December 31, 20167,090,465$32.430$-

As of December 31, 2013,2016, the Company had approximately $17.1$208.8 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures, related to RSUs and RSAs, which willis expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of approximately 3.343.0 years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

    Concurrent with the effectiveness of the underwriting agreement in connection with the IPO on March 1, 2012, the Company’s 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) became effective. The ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a discount through payroll deductions of up to 15% of their eligible compensation, subject to any plan limitations, during designated offering periods. At the end of each offering period that began prior to December 1, 2014, employees arewere able to purchase shares at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Company’s Class A common stock on the first trading day of the offering period or on the last day of the offering period. The Company initiated anAt the end of each offering underperiod that began December 1, 2014 or later, employees are able to purchase shares at 85% of the ESPPfair market value of the Company’s common stock on June 3, 2013, withthe last day of the offering period.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, employees purchased 342,057 shares at a twenty-four month duration, with purchase periods every six months, with the first purchase period of November 29, 2013. There were 81,900 shares purchased by employees under the ESPP at weighted-average purchase price of $23.93$26.12 per share. A new offering was initiated starting December 2, 2013, with a twenty-four month duration and with purchase periods occurring every six months, with the first purchase period in May 2014. The Company recognized $1.2$1.5 million of stock-based compensation expense related to the ESPP duringin the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2016.

F-22



Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The fair value of options granted to employees is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. This valuation model for stock-based compensation expense requires the Company to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculation, including the expected term (weighted-average period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding), the volatility in the fair market value of the Company’s Class A common stock, a risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends and the estimated forfeitures of unvested stock options. To the extent actual results differ from the estimates, the difference will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised.dividends. No compensation cost is recorded for options that do not vest. The Company uses the simplified calculation of expected life and volatility is based on an average of the historical volatilities of the common stock of several entities with characteristics similar to those of the Company. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. Expected forfeitures are based on the Company’s historical experience.

F-26



Table of Contents

The Company uses the straight-line method for expense attribution. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, the weighted-average assumptions are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
     2013     2012     2011
Dividend yield 
Annual risk-free rate 1.25% 1.01% 2.30%
Expected volatility60.83%62.76%60.71%
Expected term (years)6.176.186.08

    The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the ESPP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013:

Dividend yield
Annual risk-free rate0.19%
Expected volatility56.30%
Expected term (years)1.25
Year Ended December 31,
      2016      2015      2014
Dividend yield---
Annual risk-free rate1.53%1.78%2.07%
Expected volatility44.00%49.27%57.56%
Expected term (years)5.846.116.17

The following table summarizes the effects of stock-based compensation expense related to stock-based awards to employees and non-employees onin the Company’s consolidated statements of operations as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, is as followsduring the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
     2013     2012     2011
Stock-based compensation effects in loss before income taxes:
Cost of revenue$    421$    122$    50
Sales and marketing10,1314,9171,607
Product development6,2701,705721
General and administrative 9,3008,1342,499
Restructuring and integration 555    
       Total stock-based compensation$26,677$14,878$4,877
Year Ended December 31,
      2016      2015      2014
Cost of Revenue$2,446$1,117$729
Sales and marketing     27,098     21,962     15,083
Product Development36,32323,43114,804
General and administrative20,39414,33211,657
Restructuring and integration---
Total stock-based compensation in income (loss) before
incomes taxes86,26160,84242,273
Benefit from income taxes(643)(402)(15,064)
Total stock-based compensation in income (loss)$85,618$60,440$27,209

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015 and 2011,2014, the Company capitalized $0.5$4.5 million, $0.3$3.0 million and $0.2$2.3 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense as website development costs.

12.15. NET LOSSINCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

    Basic and diluted net loss per common share for periods prior to the completion of the Company’s IPO is presented in conformity with the two-class method required for participating securities. Holders of Series A, SeriesB, Series C, Series D and Series E redeemable convertible preferred stock were each entitled to receive noncumulative dividends at the annual rate of $0.0015, $0.006696, $0.018582, $0.061935 and $0.12882 per share per annum, respectively, payable prior and in preference to any dividends on any shares of the Company’s common stock. In the event a dividend is paid on common stock, the holders of Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D and Series E redeemable convertible preferred stock were entitled to a proportionate share of any such dividend as if they were holders of common stock (on an as-if converted basis). The holders of the Company’s Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D and Series E redeemable convertible preferred stock did not have a contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company. The Company considered its preferred stock to be participating securities and, in accordance with the two-class method, earnings allocated to preferred stock and the related number of outstanding shares of preferred stock have been excluded from the computation of basic and diluted net loss per common share.

F-23



    Under the two-class method, net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders is determined by allocating undistributed earnings, calculated as net income less current period Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D and Series E redeemable convertible preferred stock non-cumulative dividends, between common stock and Series A and Series B convertible preferred stock and Series C and D redeemable convertible preferred stock. In computing diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders, undistributed earnings are re-allocated to reflect the potential impact of dilutive securities. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Shares of common stock subject to repurchase resulting from the early exercise of employee stock options are considered participating securities and are therefore included in the basic weighted-average common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, including potential dilutive common shares assuming the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method.

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders for periods followingprior to the completion of the Company’s IPO isConversion are presented in conformity with the “two-class method” required for participating securities. Immediately priorPrior to the consummation of the IPO in March 2012, all outstandingConversion, shares of preferred stock and common stock were converted to Class B common stock. As a result, Class A and Class B common stock arewere the only outstanding equity in the Company. The rights of the holders of Class A and Class B common stock arewere identical, except with respect to voting and conversion. Each share of Class A common stock iswas entitled to one vote per share and each classshare of Class B common stock iswas entitled to 10ten votes per share. Shares of Class B common stock may be convertedwere convertible into Class A common stock at any time at the option of the stockholder, and arewere automatically converted upon sale or transfer to Class A common stock, subject to certain limited exceptions, amongand in connection with certain other ways.conversion events.

Under the two-class method, basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and, if dilutive, potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company’s potential shares of common stock consist of the incremental shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options, shares issuable upon the vesting of RSUs and, to a lesser extent, unvested shares subject to RSAs and purchases related to the ESPP. The dilutive effect of these potential shares of common stock is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. The computation of the diluted net income (loss) per share of Class A common stock assumes the conversion of Class B common stock, while the diluted net income (loss) per share of Class B common stock does not assume the conversion of Class B common stock.

F-27



Table of Contents

The undistributed earnings are allocated based on the contractual participation rights of the Class A and Class B common stock as if the earnings for the year have been distributed. As the liquidation and dividend rights are identical, the undistributed earnings are allocated on a proportionate basis. Further, as the conversion of Class B common stock is assumed in the computation of the diluted net income (loss) per share of Class A common stock, the undistributed earnings are equal to net income (loss) for that computation.

On September 22, 2016, the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock converted into a single class of common stock. Because shares of Class A and Class B common stock were outstanding for a portion of the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company has disclosed earnings per common share for both classes of common stock for the current period.Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders for periods after the conversion will be presented based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net lossincome (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):

Year Ended December 31, 
     2013     2012     2011
Class A     Class BClass A     Class B
Net loss$    (6,291)$    (3,777)$    (3,464)$    (15,649)$    (16,668)
Add: accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock(6)(26)(189)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders$(6,291)$(3,777)$(3,470)$(15,675)$(16,857)
Basic shares:
       Weighted-average common shares outstanding41,03324,6329,81544,33315,291
Diluted shares:
       Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted net loss per share41,03324,6329,81544,33315,291
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:  
       Basic$(0.15) $(0.15)$(0.35) $(0.35) $(1.10)
       Diluted$(0.15)$(0.15) $(0.35)$(0.35)$(1.10)
Year Ended December 31,
201620152014
   Class A   Class B   Class A   Class B   Class A   Class B
Basic net income (loss) per share
attributable to common stockholders:
      Numerator:
            Net income (loss)$    (4,296)$    (374)$    (28,694)$    (4,206)$    31,178$    5,295
            Allocation of undistributed earnings$(4,296)$(374)$(28,694)$(4,206)$31,178$5,295
      Denominator:
            Weighted-average shares
            outstanding70,9976,18965,1359,54861,49210,444
Basic net income (loss) per share
attributable to common stockholders:$(0.06)$(0.06)$(0.44)$(0.44)$0.51$0.51
Diluted net income (loss) per share
attributable to common stockholders:
      Numerator:
            Allocation of undistributed earnings
            for basic calculations$(4,296)$(374)$(28,694)$(4,206)$31,178$5,295
            Reallocation of undistributed
            earnings as a result of conversion
            from Class B to Class A shares(374)-(4,206)-5,295-
            Reallocation of undistributed
            earnings to Class B shares---911
                   Allocation of undistributed
                   earnings$(4,670)$(374)$(32,900)$(4,206)$36,473$6,206
       Denominator:
              Number of shares used in basic
              calculation70,9976,18965,1359,54861,49210,444
              Weighted-average effect of dilutive
              securities
                     Conversion of Class B to Class
                     A common shares outstanding6,189-9,548-10,444-
                     Stock options----4,3772,584
                     Other dilutive securities----39925
                            Number of shares used in
                            diluted calculation77,1866,18974,6839,54876,71213,053
Diluted net income (loss) per share
attributable to common stockholders:$(0.06)$(0.06)$(0.44)$(0.44)$0.48$0.48

F-24




Table of Contents

The following employee stock awardsweighted-average stock-based instruments were excluded from the calculation of diluted net lossincome (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
     2013     2012     2011
Employee stock options11,10110,1139,303
Restricted stock units 444284
Restricted stock awards73 116 169
Employee stock purchase plan20
Year Ended December 31,
     2016     2015     2014
Stock options  2,082     8,206   71
Restricted stock units and awards2,0904,095
Contingently issuable shares-309

13.16. INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with authoritative guidance, which requires the use of the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the difference between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be reversed.

The following table presents domestic and foreign components of income (loss) before income taxes for the periods presented (in thousands):

     2013     2012     2011201620152014
United States$    (6,184)$    (12,624)$    (14,684)      $1,679      $(18,604)      $13,083
Foreign  (3,046) (6,367)(1,882)(4,964)(2,334)(1,803)
Total$(9,230)$(18,991) $(16,566)$      (3,285)$      (20,938)$      11,280



Table of Contents

The income tax provision is composed of the following (in thousands):

     2013     2012     2011      2016      2015      2014
Current:
Federal$    $    $    $-$(10)$-
State14532035370704
Foreign1,18913695861,0101,322
1,334139115$121$1,370$2,026
Deferred:
Federal$$$$106$3,505$(14,806)
State136,245(7,613)
Foreign(496)(17)(13)1,145842(4,800)
(496)(17)(13)1,26410,592(27,219)
Total provision for income taxes$838$122$102
Total provision for (benefit from)
income taxes$      1,385$      11,962$      (25,193)

The following table presents a reconciliation of the statutory federal rate and the Company’s effective tax rate for the periods presented:

     2013     2012     2011      2016      2015      2014
Tax benefit at federal statutory rate(34.00%)(34.00%)(34.00%)35.00%35.00%35.00%
State—net of federal effect(4.71)(5.84)(5.92)
State-net of federal effect21.415.323.63
Foreign rate differential33.11(38.74)2.99(1.54)(10.03)(2.17)
Stock-based compensation1.217.967.2610.50(3.60)12.76
Acquisition costs0.512.390.00-(0.38)-
Meals & Entertainment3.743.051.07(13.84)(2.63)3.75
Tax credits(39.77)(5.22)0.00163.8714.30(23.37)
Change in valuation allowance45.0270.1327.71(189.19)(96.18)(248.14)
Change in tax rate(0.12)(0.73)(4.72)
Benefit for tax only asset-4.99-
Non-deductible expenses(6.16)(1.58)1.36
Prior year deferred true-ups(11.81)(0.57)-
Expiration of deferred benefit(50.76)--
Other3.950.911.500.47(1.00)(1.44)
Effective tax rate9.06%0.64%0.61%
Effective Tax Rate(42.17)%(57.09)%(223.34)%

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. The increaseultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in incomewhich those temporary differences become deductible.

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, based on the available objective evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that its domestic deferred tax expense in 2013 as compared to 2012 is primarily due to an increase in foreign earnings. The effective tax rate in 2013 reflects a $3.7 million tax benefit attributable to California Enterprise Zone credits related to 2007 through 2013. Managementassets will not be realized. Accordingly, management has applied a full valuation allowance against theits domestic net deferred tax assetsassets.

The effective tax rate in 2016 reflects a $1.4 million expense associated with establishing a valuation allowance against certain foreign deferred tax assets as a result of the California Enterprise Zone credits.winding down of sales and marketing activities outside of the United States and Canada. At the end of 2016, the Company could not assert at the required more-likely-than-not level of certainty, that some of its foreign operations would generate sufficient taxable income to realize all of its deferred tax assets after considering the relative impact of all evidence, positive and negative. In making its evaluation, the Company considered recent changes in foreign operations as a significant piece of negative evidence. As a result, the Company established a valuation allowance against some of its foreign deferred tax assets in the year ended December 31, 2016.

F-25F-30



Table of Contents

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The following table presents the significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities for the periods presented (in thousands):

     2013      2012 2016     2015
Deferred tax assets:
Reserves and others$     4,285$     3,673$     13,382$     8,656
Accrued legal12332
Stock-based compensation      10,4164,29529,40226,236
Contribution carryforward2,0702,223111,782
Net operating loss carryforward17,33517,81064,4787,048
Tax credit carryforward4,6711,00217,1858,985
Gross deferred tax assets38,78929,335124,45852,707
Valuation allowance(31,166)(25,714)(92,191)(20,542)
Total deferred tax assets7,6233,62132,26732,165
Deferred tax liabilities: 
Depreciation and amortization(7,095)(3,593)(30,140)(28,896)
Total deferred tax liabilities(7,095)(3,593)(30,140)(28,896)
Net deferred tax assets$528$28
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$2,127$3,269

    In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

    As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, based on the available objective evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets, except for those recorded in the UK and Australia entities, will not be realized. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax assets related to the UK and Australia will be realized. Accordingly, management has applied a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets except for those recorded in the UK and Australia entities at December 31, 2013 and 2012. The net change in the total valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 was an increase of approximately $5.5 million, $13.3 million and $4.5 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2013,2016, the Company hashad federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $113.3$154.9 million and $79.8$132.9 million, respectively, expiring beginning in 2024 and 2014,2017, respectively. Further, theThe Company hasalso had cumulative trading losses of $10.1 million and of $7.2 million at December 31, 2016 in Ireland of $15.9 million. The Ireland trading losses may be carried forward indefinitely against Ireland profits. The Company has losses of $11.8 million, $12.9 million, and $1.8 million in Germany the United Kingdom and France, respectively, which may be carried forward indefinitely against profits in the respective jurisdictions as a result of the acquisition of Qype.jurisdictions. At December 31, 2013,2016, the Company hashad federal research credit carryforwards of approximately $2.0$8.6 million that expire beginning in 2024, and California research credit carryforwards of approximately $2.0$8.0 million whichthat do not expire. At December 31, 2013,2016, the Company also has $3.7had $5.2 million of California Enterprise Zone credit, expiring beginning in 2023.2024.

Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and credits may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses and credits before utilization. The Company completed a Section 382 and 383 analysis through 2012 and determined that andoes not expect any previous ownership change,changes, as defined under Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, occurred in prior years. The Company does not expect the limitation to result in a reduction inlimitation that will reduce the total amount utilizable.of net operating loss carryforwards and credits that can be utilized. Further, Qype’sforeign loss carryforwards may be subject to limitations under the applicable laws of the taxing jurisdictions due to ownership change limitations.

F-26



    AsEffective as of January 1, 2016, the Company early adopted a result of certain realization requirements ofchange in accounting policy in accordance with ASU 2016-09, which eliminated the accounting guidance for stock-based compensation,requirement that excess tax benefits be realized as a reduction in current taxes payable before the table ofassociated tax benefit could be recognized as an increase in paid in capital. Under ASU 2016-09, these previously unrecognized deferred tax assets and liabilities shown above does not include certain deferred tax assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 that arose directly from (orwere recognized on a modified retrospective basis as of January 1, 2016, the usestart of the year in which was postponed by) tax deductions related to equity compensation in excess of compensation recognized for financial reporting.the Company early adopted ASU 2016-09. Approximately $93.2$164.1 million of federal net operating losses, and $66.6$125.7 million of state net operating losses, $1.4 million of Ireland net operating losses, $1.3 million of federal research and development tax credits and $0.1 million of state Enterprise Zone credits are related to tax stock option deductions in excess of book deductions.deductions and are not included in the balance shown above as of December 31, 2015. The Company usesU.S. federal and state net operating losses and credits recognized as of January 1, 2016, as described above, have been offset by a valuation allowance. As a result, only the accounting guidance for income taxes for purposesIreland net operating losses resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of determining when$0.2 million (which reduced the accumulated deficit) as of January 1, 2016. Additionally, ASU 2016-09 addresses the presentation of excess tax benefits have been realized.and employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows. The Company is now required to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity in the same manner as other cash flows related to income taxes on the statement of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. The Company adopted this change prospectively.

F-31



Table of Contents

It is the intention of the Company to reinvest the earnings from Canada, France, Germany, United Kingdom,Darwin Social Marketing Inc., Yelp UK Ltd. and Yelp Ireland Holding Company Limited.Limited and its subsidiaries. The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries as such earnings are to be reinvested indefinitely. As of December 31, 2013, $4.32016, the Company estimates $2.6 million of cumulative amount of earnings upon which U.S. income taxes have not been provided. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability with respect to such earnings is not practicable. The additional taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries, if remitted, would be partially offset by U.S. tax credits for foreign taxes already paid.

As of December 31, 20132016, 2015 and 2012,2014, the Company has $1.8had $10.3 million, $5.0 million and $0.6$3.3 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits. The Company had a nominal amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the year ended December 31, 2011.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized benefits is as follows (in thousands):

     2013     2012     2011   2016   2015   2014
Balance at the beginning of the year$     611$     1$     1$     5,049$     3,276$     1,774
Increase based on tax positions related to the prior year3495
Increase (Decrease) based on tax positions related to the prior year1,381(31)69
Increase based on tax positions related to the current year1,1601154,1311,8041,433
Lapse of statute of limitations(221)--
Balance at the end of the year$1,774$611$1$10,340$5,049$3,276

As of December 31, 2013, $1.62016, the Company had $0.8 million of the Company’s $1.8million unrecognized tax benefits are subject to full valuation allowance and, if recognized, will not affect the annual effective tax rate. Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, is an immaterial amount of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. During each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012,2016, 2015 and 2011,2014, the Company had an immaterial amountsamount related to the accrual of interest and penalties.

In addition, the Company is subject to the continuous examination of its income tax returns by the IRS and other tax authorities. The Company’s federal and state income tax returns for fiscal years subsequent to 2003 remain open to examination. In the Company’s most significant foreign jurisdictions — Ireland, United Kingdom and Germany — the tax years subsequent to 2010 remain open to examination. The Company doesregularly assesses the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from examinations to determine the adequacy of its provision for income taxes, and monitors the progress of ongoing discussions with tax authorities and the impact, if any, of the expected expiration of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions. The Company believes that an adequate provision has been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations. However, the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty. If any issues addressed in the Company’s tax audits are resolved in a manner not have any tax positionsconsistent with management’s expectations, the Company could be required to adjust its provision for whichincome taxes in the period such resolution occurs. Although the timing of the resolution or closure of audits is not certain, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible the total amount of grossthat its unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease withincould be reduced by an immaterial amount over the 12 months of the year endedfollowing December 31, 2013.

    The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various states and foreign jurisdictions. Due to the Company’s net losses, substantially all of its federal, state and foreign income tax returns since inception are still subject to audit.

    During January 2013, the U.S. Federal Research and Development Tax Credit was reinstated retroactively to 2012. The U.S. Federal Research and Development Tax Credit benefit was recorded in the first quarterof 2013, the period of enactment.

    On September 13, 2013, the U.S. Treasury Department released final income tax regulations on the deduction and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property. These final regulations apply to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. Several of the provisions within the regulations will require a tax accounting method change to be filed with the IRS, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment; however, we do not anticipate the impact of these changes to be material to our consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations, or both.2016.

14. RELATED-PARTY17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company does not have any significant related party transactions, other than contributions made to The Foundation (see Note 11).transactions.

15.18. INFORMATION ABOUT REVENUE AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS

The Company considers operating segments to be components of the Company in which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The chief operating decision maker for the Company is the Chief Executive Officer.chief executive officer. The Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis, accompanied by information about revenue by product line and geographic region for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance.

F-32



Table of Contents

The Company has one business activity and there are no segment managers who are held accountable for operations, operating results or plans for levels or components below the consolidated unit level. Accordingly, the Company has determined that it has a single operating and reporting segment.

F-27



Revenue by geography is based on the billing address of the customer.

Net Revenue

Prior to this annual report, the Company classified revenue from its “local” products — consisting of business listing and advertising products that are sold directly to businesses and Yelp Reservations — as local revenue, and revenue generated through partner arrangements, including resale of advertising products by certain partners, and monetization of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks as other services revenue.

The following tables present the Company’sCompany now classifies revenue from all of its business listing and advertising products, including advertising sold by partners, as advertising revenue. As a result, revenue generated through ad resales and monetization of remnant advertising inventory through third-party ad networks is now classified as advertising revenue rather than other services revenue, and revenue from Yelp Reservations, a subscription service, is recognized as other services revenue. All disclosures relating to revenue by product line, as well ashave been updated to this revised classification for all periods presented.

The following table presents the Company’s net revenue and long-lived assets by geographic regionproduct line for the periods presented (in thousands):, reflecting the changes to its revenue categories described above:

Year Ended December 31,
201620152014
(dollars in thousands)
Net revenue by product:
      Advertising     $    645,241     $    471,416     $    335,450
      Transactions62,49543,8545,247
      Brand advertising-31,01234,482
      Other services5,3333,4292,357
            Total net revenue$713,069$549,711$377,536

For purposes of comparison, the following table presents the Company’s net revenue by product line for the periods presented (in thousands) based on the revenue categories in effect prior to the three months ended December 31, 2016:

Year Ended December 31,
    2016    2015    2014
(dollars in thousands)
Net revenue by product:
      Local$    624,694$    448,236$    319,137
      Transactions62,49543,8545,247
      Brand advertising-31,01234,482
      Other services25,88026,60918,670
            Total net revenue$713,069$549,711$377,536



Table of Contents

Net revenue

Year Ended December 31,
     2013     2012     2011
Net revenue by product:
       Local advertising$     192,983$     109,159$     58,473
       Brand advertising27,96020,57917,686
       Other services12,0457,8297,126
              Total$232,988$137,567$83,285

    ForDuring the fiscal years ended December 31, 20132016, 2015 and 2012, revenue generated internationally was 4.6% and 2.2%, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2011, all of the Company’s revenue was generated in the United States. No2014, no individual customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net revenue in any of such periods.revenue.

Long-Lived Assets

December 31,
201320122011
United States     $     29,186     $     14,275     $     11,675
All Other Countries1,78670254
       Total long-lived assets$30,972$14,977$11,729

16. CORRECTIONOF ERROR

    Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s 2012 consolidated financial statements, the Company identified immaterial corrections in the classification of certain balances within prepaid expenses and other current assets and also within accrued liabilities. Specifically, prepaid rent was recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets when the underlying terms would indicate that the prepaid rent should be recorded in other assets. In addition, the Company previously recorded deferred rent as an accrued liability when the underlying terms would indicate that a portion of the deferred rent should have been recorded as long-term liabilities. The correction of the above items have no impact on revenue, net loss or the Company’s cash flows. The following table presents the correctionCompany’s net revenue by geographic region for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
2016    2015    2014
United States$     698,244$     537,567$     366,579
All other countries14,82512,14410,957
      Total net revenue$713,069$549,711$377,536

Long-Lived Assets

The following table presents the Company’s long-lived assets by geographic region for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
    2016    2015    2014
United States$    89,362$    78,675$    73,344
All other countries3,0785,4935,900
      Total long-lived assets$92,440$84,168$79,244

19. RESTRUCTURING AND INTEGRATION

The following table presents the Company’s restructuring and integration costs for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Year Ended December31,
2016     2015     2014
Restructuring and integration$     3,455$              -$              -

On November 2, 2016, the Company announced plans to significantly reduce sales and marketing activities in markets outside of these items from originally reported amountsthe United States and Canada. The Company incurred $ 3.5 million in restructuring and integration costs associated with this plan for the year ended December 31, 2012:2016, of which $2.0 million had been paid by December 31, 2016. The Company expects to pay the remaining $1.5 million during the year ending December 31, 2017.

As Originally ReportedAs Corrected
(in thousands)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets     $     4,912     $     4,470
Total current assets111,774111,332
Other assets$182$624
Accrued liabilities$16,367$14,974
Total current liabilities21,50720,114
Long-term liabilities$527$1,920

F-28The costs primarily related to severance costs for affected employees. No goodwill, intangible assets or other long lived assets have been determined to be impaired. The restructuring plan was substantially completed by the year ended December 31, 2016, with approximately $0.2 million expected to be incurred during the year ended December 31, 2017.

F-34



Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX20. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Filed
Incorporated by ReferenceHerewith
Exhibit        
NumberExhibit Description      Form     File No.     Exhibit     Filing Date      
2.1Share Purchase Agreement, dated October 23, 2012, by and among Yelp Inc., Yelp Ireland Ltd., Qype GmbH and the shareholders of Qype GmbH.8-K001-3544499.110/24/2012
 
2.2Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 18, 2013, by and among Yelp Inc., Ranger Merger Corp., Ranger Merger LLC, SeatMe, Inc. and Alexander Kvamme, as Stockholders’ Agent.8-K001-3544499.17/24/2013
 
3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Yelp Inc.8-K001-354443.13/9/2012
 
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws of Yelp Inc.S-1/A333-1780303.42/3/2012
 
4.1Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.
 
4.2Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate.S-1/A333-1780304.12/3/2012
 
4.3Form of Class B Common Stock Certificate.S-1/A333-1780304.22/3/2012
 
10.1Fourth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, by and between Yelp Inc. and the investors listed on Schedules I and II thereto, dated January 22, 2010.S-1333-17803010.111/17/2011
 
10.2*Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1333-17803010.211/17/2011
 
10.3*Form of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1333-17803010.311/17/2011
  
10.4*2011 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1/A333-17803010.42/3/2012
 
10.5*Forms of Option Agreement and Option Grant Notice under 2011 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1/A333-17803010.52/3/2012
  
10.6*Form of Indemnification Agreement made by and between Yelp Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers.S-1/A333-17803010.62/3/2012
  
10.7*Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Geoff Donaker, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.72/3/2012
  
10.8*Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Rob Krolik, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.82/3/2012
  
10.9*Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Jed Nachman, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.92/3/2012
  
10.10*Amended and Restated Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Laurence Wilson, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.102/3/2012
 
10.11Galleria Corporate Center Lease between Yelp Inc. and JEMB SCOTTSDALE LLC, dated January 20, 2010; First Amendment to Lease, dated January 4, 2011; Second Amendment to Lease, dated August 8, 2011.S-1/A333-17803010.132/3/2012

On February 28, 2017, the Company acquired Nowait, a restaurant technology company with the industry’s leading waitlist system and seating tool. The aggregate purchase price of approximately $40 million was paid in cash, and includes the partial stake previously acquired by the Company.

The purchase price is subject to customary working capital adjustments. The Company is currently in the process of valuing the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, which will be reflected in the Company's financial statements for the period ending March 31, 2017.

In October 2016, the Company acquired a 20% interest in the preferred stock of Nowait for $8.0 million in cash, which is recorded as a cost-method investment as part of non-current in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 (see Note 9).

The Company expects the acquisition to drive daily engagement in the key restaurant vertical, by allowing Yelp users to more quickly move from search and discovery to transacting at a local business.

F-35



 Filed
Incorporated by ReferenceHerewith
Exhibit
Number     Exhibit Description        Form     File No.     Exhibit     Filing Date      
10.12License Agreement between Harrison 160, LLC, as Licensor, and MRL Ventures Inc., as Licensee, dated as of April 16, 2004; Addendums through November 10, 2011.S-1/A333-17803010.142/3/2012
 
10.13*Offer Letter, by and between Yelp Inc. and Jeremy Stoppelman, dated February 3, 2012.S-1/A333-17803010.152/3/2012
 
10.14*2012 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended.8-K001-3544410.16/11/2013 
 
10.15*Form of Option Agreement and Grant Notice and RSU Award Agreement and Grant Notice under 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.S-1/A333-17803010.172/3/2012
  
10.16*2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.S-1/A333-17803010.182/3/2012
  
10.17*Executive Severance Benefit Plan.S-1/A 333-17803010.192/3/2012
 
10.18*Secondment Agreement, dated April 25, 2012, by and between Yelp Inc. and Jed Nachman.8-K001-3544499.14/27/2012 
 
10.19Lease Agreement, by and between Yelp UK Limited and Knight Frank LLP, dated March 1, 2012.10-Q001-3544410.115/4/2012
 
10.20Office Lease, dated May 9, 2012, by and between Yelp Inc. and Stockbridge 138 New Montgomery LLC.8-K001-3544410.15/10/2012 
 
10.21*2013 Compensation Information for Registrant’s Executive Officers.8-K001-354442/8/2013
 
10.22Master Subscription Agreement, dated May 18, 2007, by and between Yelp Inc. and salesforce.com.X
 
21.1Subsidiaries of Yelp Inc.X
 
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.X
 
24.1Power of Attorney (included on signature page).X
 
31.1Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).X
 
31.2Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).X
 
32.1†Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.X
 
101.INS#XBRL Instance Document.X
 
101.SCH#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.X
 
101.CAL#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.X
 
101.DEF#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.X
 
101.LAB#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.X
 
101.PRE#XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.X



Filed
Incorporated by ReferenceHerewith
Exhibit
NumberExhibit DescriptionFormFile No.ExhibitFiling Date
*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 accompany this Annual Report, are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Yelp Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, the Registrant is deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation related to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and is not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as the Registrant has made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amends the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fails to comply with the submission requirements. These interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for the purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.