UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549.20549

Form

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended DecemberFiscal Year Ended March 31, 20162023

OR

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TOUNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from_______to_______from _____________ to ________________

Commission File Numberfile number 000-53361

BITNILE METAVERSE, INC.

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada 39-207569330-0680177
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)Number)

303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 

3333 S. Pinnacle Hills Parkway, Suite 220

Rogers, AR

78215
 72758(800) 762-7293
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

(479) 259-2977

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities

Title of each classTrading symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

BNMV

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

(The Nasdaq Capital Market)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:     Common Stock, par value $0.001 per shareNone

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 monthsyear (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ☒  No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒  No  ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  ☐Accelerated filer ☒  ☐
Non-accelerated filer  ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company  ☒
Emerging growth company  ☐ ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

The

As of September 30, 2022, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-votingregistrant’s common equitystock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold as of the last business dayregistrant was $30,023,598 based on the closing sale price as reported on the Nasdaq Stock Market of $39.00. Shares of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $432,431,000.

Ascommon stock held by executive officers, directors or 10% beneficial owners and by each other person who may be deemed to be an affiliate of March 10, 2017, therethe registrant have been excluded from this computation. This calculation does not reflect a determination that certain persons are affiliates of the registrant for any other purpose.

There were 39,175,5862,522,816 shares of common stock par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portionsoutstanding as of the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders areJuly 10, 2023.

Documents incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.reference: None

 

 

 

BITNILE METAVERSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2023

INDEX

 Page
 PART IPage
Item 1.PART IBusiness.1
   
Item 1.Business1
Item 1A.Risk Factors.Factors414
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments39
Item 2.Properties39
Item 3.Legal Proceedings39
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures40
PART II   
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.10
5. 
Item 2.Properties.10
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.10
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.10
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.Securities1141
Item 6. Reserved41
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.12
7. 
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.1242
Item 7A. 
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Risk1456
Item 8. 
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.1556
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure56
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures57
Item 9B.Other Information57
Item 9C.Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections57
PART III   
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.16
10. 
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.16
Item 9B.Other Information.18
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.1958
Item 11. Executive Compensation63
Item 11.Executive Compensation.19
12. 
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.Matters1965
Item 13. 
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.Independence1967
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services68
PART IV   
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.19
15. 
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.Schedules2069
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary72
Signatures73

 

i

 

PART I

 

Forward-Looking StatementsNOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements underwithin the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act and other federal securities laws that are subjectof 1934, as amended. These statements relate to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyondfuture events or our control including without limitation the following: (i) our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions are subjectfuture financial performance. We have attempted to change at any time at our discretion; (ii) our plans and results of operations will be affected by our ability to manage growth; and (iii) other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or “SEC”). 

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such asincluding “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,’’ “will,’’ “should,’’ “could,’’ “expects,’’ “plans,’’ “intends,’’ “anticipates,’’ “believes,’’ “estimates,’’ “predicts,’’ “seeks,” “potential,’’” “predict,” “should” or “continue’’“will” or the negative of suchthese terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions; uncertainties and other factors may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels or activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such statements.

These forward-looking statementsOur expectations are made only as of the date hereof. We are under no dutythis Annual Report is filed, and we do not intend to update or revise any of thesethe forward-looking statements after the date this Annual Report is filed to confirm these statements to actual results, unless required by law.

This Annual Report also contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other industry data. This data involves a number of this report or to provide any assurance with respect to future performance or results. You are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performanceassumptions and involve riskslimitations, and uncertainties. Readersyou are cautioned not to placegive undue reliance on these forward-looking statementsweight to such estimates. We have not independently verified the statistical and should readother industry data generated by independent parties and contained in this report thoroughly withAnnual Report and, accordingly, we cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness, though we do generally believe the understanding thatdata to be reliable. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance and the actualfuture performance of the industries in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report. These and other factors could cause results mayto differ materially from those set forthexpressed in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including, without limitation, unforeseen events beyond management’s controlestimates made by the independent parties and assumptions that prove to be inaccurate or unfounded. The following list of examples, while not exclusive or exhaustive, includes someby us.

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Below is a summary of the many possible unforeseen developmentsprincipal factors that may cause actual results to differ from anticipated or desired results: make an investment in our common stock speculative. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below under the heading “Risk Factors” and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this Annual Report and our other filings with the SEC before making investment decisions regarding our common stock.

 

Overall economicWe have incurred significant losses since inception, we may continue to incur losses and business conditions;negative cash flows in the future;

Increased competitionWe will need to raise additional capital to fund our operations in the sustainability consumer and retail markets and the industries in which we compete;furtherance of our business plan.

ChangesWe have an evolving business model, which increases the complexity of our business.

There are various inherent risks related to the Company’s planned spinoffs, including but not limited to, the risk of change in record date by an external regulator, delays in the economic, competitive, legal,effectiveness of registration statements, and business conditions in localthe transfer of intellectual property and regional markets and in the national and international marketplace;litigation;

We recently acquired BitNile.com, Inc.; its risks have become ours, as it is currently our principal operating business.

The actions of national, stateSeries B and local legislative, regulatory, and judicial bodies and authorities;Series C preferred stock, if approved for by our shareholders, could result in significant dilution when converted into common stock;

Delays or interruptionsThere are various inherent risks related to the Company’s non-core digital asset hosting business in entering into contracts or acquiring necessary assets;Agora.

The necessityThere are various inherent risks related to expand or curtail operations, obtain additional capital, or change business strategy;the Company’s non-core intellectual property in Zest Labs.

Changes in technology; and,Our holding company model presents certain additional risks.

AnyOur growth strategy is subject to a significant degree of risk.

We are heavily dependent on our senior management, and a loss of a member of our senior management team could cause our stock price to suffer.

If we fail to anticipate and adequately respond to rapid technological changes in our principal industry, including evolving industry-wide standards, in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We may be significantly impacted by developments and changes in laws and regulations, including increased regulation of the other factors discussedcrypto asset industry.

If we do not continue to satisfy the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC’s continued listing requirements, our common stock could be delisted from Nasdaq. In particular, on June 21, 2023, we received a letter from Nasdaq notifying us that we have violated Nasdaq’s voting rights rule set forth in this report, including those factors discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors”.Listing Rule 5640.

 

As used in this Annual Report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our”, and “Ecoark Holdings” mean Ecoark Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company”), unless otherwise indicated. 

Our common stock price is volatile.

 

Except as otherwise indicated, dollar amounts and numbers of shares that follow in this report are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.ii

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

ItemUnless the context otherwise indicates or requires, all product names and trade names used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) are the Company’s trademarks, although the “®” and “™” trademark designations may have been omitted.

As used in this Annual Report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “BitNile Metaverse” and the “Company” mean BitNile Metaverse, Inc., a Nevada corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.

Overview

BitNile Metaverse, Inc. (“BitNile Metaverse” or the “Company”) is a holding company, incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 19, 2007. Through March 31, 2023, the Company’s former wholly owned subsidiaries with the exception of Agora Digital Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Agora”) and Zest Labs, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Zest Labs”) have been treated for accounting purposes as divested. See below in Note 1 Business“Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 2 “Discontinued Operations.” As a result of the divestitures, all assets and liabilities of the former subsidiaries have been reclassified to discontinued operations on the consolidated balance sheet for March 31, 2022 and all operations of these companies have been reclassified to discontinued operations and loss on disposal on the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended March 31, 2023.

 

OverviewThe Company’s principal subsidiaries consisted of (a) BitNile.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“BNC”) which includes the platform BitNile.com (the “Platform”) and that was acquired by the Company on March 6, 2023, which transaction has been reflected as an asset purchase, and (b) Ecoark, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ecoark”) that is the parent of Zest Labs and Agora.

 

On June 17, 2022 Agora sold its ownership in Trend Discovery Holdings, LLC to a non-related third party, and currently holds only the assets that remain in Bitstream Mining, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary. In addition, Ecoark sold 100% of Banner Midstream Corp., in two separate transactions. Ecoark sold the oil and gas production and service assets to Fortium Holdings Corp. (renamed White River Energy Corp) (“WTRV”) on July 25, 2022, and sold its transportation services assets to Enviro Technologies US, Inc. (renamed Wolf Energy Services, Inc.) (“Wolf Energy”) on September 7, 2022. For full details of these transactions, we refer you to the Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 21, 2022, July 29, 2022 and September 12, 2022. We have removed all pertinent information pertaining to the Trend Discovery Holdings, LLC, and Banner Midstream Corp operations from this Annual Report, and instead have focused our disclosure solely on our current operations.

Key Developments in the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2023

In conjunction with the acquisition of BNC on March 6, 2023, the Company changed its name from Ecoark Holdings, Inc. to BitNile Metaverse, Inc. on March 21, 2023 and its stock ticker symbol was subsequently changed from ZEST to BNMV. Furthermore, in March 2023, the Company experienced a significant change in its business model as it shifted its focus on the Platform, adapting it to becoming a revenue-generating model and away from the legacy subsidiaries Agora and Zest. The Company also achieved or experienced the following key developments during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 (“EcoarkFY 2023”):

On June 8, 2022, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Ault Lending, LLC (“Ault Lending”), pursuant to which the Company sold Ault Lending 1,200 shares of Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, 3,429 shares of Common Stock, and a warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock for a total purchase price of $12,000,000. The Series A and warrant later incurred multiple amendments in order for the Company to maintain compliance with Nasdaq listing standards.

In conjunction with the transaction with Ault Lending, Company determined it was in the best interests of its shareholders that it divest all of its principal operating assets through a series of spin-offs or stock dividends to the Company’s shareholders. It intended to do so either by engaging in business combinations with existing public companies which have trading symbols and markets like White River Energy Corp (formerly Fortium Holdings Corp.) (“WTRV”), which acquired White River Holdings Corp on July 25, 2022, and Wolf Energy Services, Inc. (formerly Enviro Technologies US, Inc.) (“Wolf Energy”), which acquired Banner Midstream Corp. on September 7, 2022, or by direct dividends. The Company’s plan was also driven in part by the dividends it must pay to Ault Lending.

Because all spin-offs for issuers in our position require that a registration statement have been declared effective by the SEC, which we have not been able to achieve, the Company did not complete any spin-offs in fiscal year 2023. The Company has decided to leave Agora in the Company and to not proceed with the spin-off of this entity, as Agora’s hosting business model has potential synergies that could be achieved with the BNC acquisition. The Company intends to transfer all of the common stock of Zest Labs into Zest Labs Holdings LLC (“Zest Holdings”), a private limited liability company the Company formed and that will own all of the intellectual property of Zest Labs as well as the rights to any funds obtained from current and future intellectual property litigation by Zest Labs. The Company also amended the Zest Labs charter to require that it distribute at least 95% of the net proceeds of the pending Zest Labs litigation recoveries, if any, to the Company’s shareholders as of November 15, 2022. Additionally, net proceeds from the sale or licensing of Zest Labs intellectual property are intended to be distributed to shareholders of record as of November 15, 2022.


On June 16, 2022, Agora entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement with Trend Ventures, LP, pursuant to which Agora sold all of its outstanding membership interests of Trend Discovery Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Agora to the purchaser in exchange for a $4.25 million senior secured promissory note issued by the purchaser to Agora.

On July 25, 2022, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with WTRV and White River Holdings Corp, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company transferred to WTRV 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of White River Holdings capital stock in exchange for 1,200 shares of WTRV’s newly designated non-voting Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Certificate of Designation of the Series A, the Series A will become convertible into 42,253,521 shares of WTRV’s common stock upon such time as WTRV has registered the underlying shares through a Form S-1. Upon effectiveness of the Form S-1, the Company intends to distribute 100% of the shares of WTRV to the Company’s shareholders of record as of September 30, 2022.

On August 23, 2022, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with Wolf Energy and Banner Midstream Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company acquired 51,987,832 shares of Wolf Energy common stock in exchange for all of the capital stock of Banner Midstream owned by Wolf Energy. Upon effectiveness of the Form S-1, the Company intends to distribute 100% of the shares of Wolf Energy to the Company’s shareholders of record as of September 30, 2022.

On December 7, 2022, Agora entered into a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”) with BitNile, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Ault Alliance, Inc. (“AAI”), governing the relationship between the parties and the services provided by Agora to the Company, which include providing the Company with digital assert mining hosting services in exchange for a monthly fee to be set out in applicable service orders. The terms of that MSA have not been met due to lack of capital by the Company to bring its 12MW of hosting power online.

On January 11, 2023, the Company made the decision to withdraw Agora’s S-1 registration statement for an initial public offering, due to market conditions as well as numerous regulatory delays with respect to factors beyond the Company’s control related to accounting for the nascent industry of Bitcoin mining.

On January 24, 2023, the Company entered into an At-The-Market Issuance Sales Agreement (“ATM”) with Ascendiant Capital Markets, LLC (“Ascendiant”), pursuant to which the Company could issue and sell from time to time, through Ascendiant, shares of the Company’s common stock with offering proceeds of up to $3,500,000. The purpose of the ATM was to ensure sufficient liquidity for the Company to continue as a going concern. Upon the sale of approximately $3,500,000 through the ATM, the Company terminated the ATM in June 2023.

On March 6, 2023, the Company entered into an Amendment to the Share Exchange Agreement dated as of February 8, 2023 by and among AAI, the owner of approximately 86% of BNC, as well as certain individuals employed by AAI, providing for the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of BNC, in exchange for (i) 8,637.5 shares of newly designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company issued to AAI, and (ii) 1,362.5 shares of newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company to be issued to the individuals employed by AAI. The Company accounted for this transaction as an asset purchase.

Description of Business

Bitnile.com, Inc.

Overview

BitNile.com, Inc. (“BNC”) is in the embryonic stage of development yet represents a significant development in the online metaverse landscape, offering immersive, interconnected digital experiences that are engaging, and dynamic. By integrating various elements such as virtual markets, real world goods marketplaces, gaming, social activities, sweepstakes, and more, BNC aims to revolutionize the way people interact online. BNC’s rapidly growing virtual world, BitNile.com (the “Platform”) is accessible via almost any device using a web browser, does not require permissions, downloads or apps, and the Platform can be enjoyed without the need for bulky and costly virtual reality headsets.

BNC’s business strategy revolves around creating a seamless, all-encompassing platform that caters to various user needs and interests. The Platform’s strategic pillars include: (i) leveraging cutting edge technology to offer a user-friendly, browser-based platform compatible with Virtual Reality (“VR”) headsets and other modern devices for an enhanced experience; (ii) providing a diverse range of products and experiences that caters to users with different interests and preferences; (iii) fostering global connections and a sense of community among users, encouraging socialization and collaboration; and (iv) focusing on continuous innovation to stay ahead of industry trends and customer expectations.


Customers

BNC targets a broad audience, including: (i) tech-savvy individuals seeking immersive digital experiences; (ii) gamers of all skill levels interested in a diverse array of gaming options; (iii) collectors and traders of digital assets, such as virtual real estate, digital art, and unique collectibles; (iv) shoppers seeking a convenient, intuitive platform for purchasing real world goods; (v) users seeking either social interaction and global connectivity in a virtual environment or an immersive shopping experience that allows real world shopping in a virtual environment; (vi) creators of virtual spaces within our virtual online environment; and (vii) business owners and marketers seeking to have an online presence with a 3D virtual online environment.

Tech-savvy Individuals

Tech-savvy individuals are drawn to BNC due to its innovative, cutting-edge technology and immersive virtual experiences. These users are likely to engage with the Platform’s virtual markets, trading digital assets like virtual real estate, world and personal space design, digital art and unique collectibles. They may also be early adopters of VR headsets, using them to explore the metaverse and interact with other users in social hubs.

Gamers of All Skill Levels

BNC attracts gamers through its wide range of gaming options, providing a diverse and comprehensive selection. The platform offers sweepstakes gaming experiences, allowing gamers to enter contests and compete against fellow players for both virtual and real money prizes. By participating in sweepstakes games, gamers can assess and demonstrate their skills in comparison to others. Additionally, BNC facilitates social gaming experiences, enabling users to engage with one another while playing single player games equipped with chat features. The platform also plans to introduce casual and multiplayer games, fostering collaboration and communication among gamers who seek a shared gaming experience. Competitive gamers have the opportunity to exhibit their abilities by engaging in contests of skill, which provide a platform for earning recognition and winning prizes.

Collectors and Traders of Digital Assets

BNC’s virtual markets cater to users interested in collecting, trading, and investing in digital assets. These users will be able to interact with the Platform’s offerings by buying, selling, and trading digital assets, such as virtual real estate, digital character skins, digital art, and unique collectibles; exploring and engaging with the digital art galleries and museums featured in the metaverse, and attending virtual events and auctions for exclusive digital asset releases and limited-edition collectibles.

Shoppers Seeking Real world Goods

Users looking for a convenient, intuitive platform to purchase real world goods can explore BNC’s real world goods marketplaces, which will offer a diverse range of products. These users can browse and purchase items from categories such as fashion, electronics, travel, and home goods; interact with virtual showrooms and product demonstrations to gain a better understanding of the products they’re interested in, and participate in virtual events, sales, and promotions to discover new products and take advantage of special offers.

Social Seekers and Global Connectors

BNC is anticipates it will attract users who prioritize social interaction and global connectivity within a virtual environment. Our future plans involve offering multiple avenues through which users can engage with the platform's offerings. This includes participating in diverse social hubs, facilitating the opportunity to meet and interact with individuals from around the world. Users will have the ability to collaborate on projects, exchange ideas, and forge new friendships within the metaverse. Additionally, they will have the freedom to build and personalize private spaces, allowing them to host virtual gatherings, parties, or events for their friends and online communities. Furthermore, users can look forward to attending virtual events, concerts, and conferences, providing them with opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals who share their interests and passions.

By understanding its target customers and the ways in which they interact with BNC’s various products and experiences, the Platform can effectively tailor its offerings to meet the needs and preferences of its diverse user base.


Products

BNC intends to offer an extensive range of products and experiences designed to cater to a diverse audience with varied interests and preferences. By providing a comprehensive suite of offerings, the Platform aims to attract and engage users, creating a vibrant and dynamic metaverse environment. The following is an expanded list of BNC’s current and planned products and experiences, most of which remain in development:

Virtual markets: Facilitating the trading of digital assets like digital skins, a graphic download that changes the appearance of characters in video games, for avatar customization in virtual real estate, digital art, and unique collectibles, enabling users to participate in a digital economy;

Real world goods marketplaces: Offering a platform for users to shop for a diverse range of real world products, including fashion, electronics, and home goods, connecting the virtual and physical worlds;

Gaming: Providing an extensive selection of gaming options for users of all skill levels, including participation in games, sweepstakes, and social gaming experiences;

Sweepstakes gaming: Featuring a dedicated gaming zone for users to engage in sweepstakes gaming, with opportunities to win both virtual and real money prizes;

Contests of skill: Organizing competitions for users to showcase their talents and compete against others for prizes and recognition in various disciplines;

Building private spaces: Allowing users to construct and customize their dream homes or private spaces, tailoring their environments with an array of design options and sharing their creations with others or keeping them as personal retreats;

Socialization and connectivity: Fostering global connections by enabling users to interact with individuals from around the world, forming new friendships, collaborating on projects, or engaging in conversations within various social hubs; and

Real and virtual concerts: Hosting live and virtual concerts within the metaverse, featuring performances from both real world and virtual artists, allowing users to attend and enjoy shows in an immersive environment.

By planning to offer a diverse and comprehensive range of products and experiences, BNC aims to create a vibrant and engaging metaverse platform that appeals to users with a wide array of interests and preferences.

Industry

The metaverse industry is experiencing rapid growth and expansion, driven by advances in technology, increased interest in virtual experiences, and the rise of digital economies. Key trends include: the integration of virtual and physical worlds; the integration of artificial intelligence (“AI”) and machine learning in virtual environments; VR and Augmented Reality (“AR”) technologies that are becoming more accessible and affordable, enabling a wider audience to engage with the metaverse; the rise of virtual concerts, events, and conferences within the metaverse, providing new opportunities for entertainment and networking; the emergence of virtual economies and markets; and the growing importance of socialization and community-building in digital spaces.


User Adoption and Growth

The growing popularity of virtual experiences and digital platforms has led to a surge in user adoption and engagement in the metaverse industry. A number of factors contribute to this growth, including: increased accessibility of VR and AR technologies, making immersive experiences more affordable and widely available; the ongoing digitization of various aspects of everyday life, from work and education to entertainment and socialization, which drives users to seek out new digital experiences; the COVID-19 pandemic, which accelerated the adoption of digital platforms and virtual experiences as people adapted to remote work, learning, and social distancing measures; greater connectivity and high-speed internet accessibility, rapid technological advancements and improved infrastructure, which have led to more people being able to access the metaverse and other virtual environments, thereby bolstering engagement and participation; the development of innovative gaming and entertainment experiences for whom the metaverse provides a platform for unique, immersive experiences that surpass traditional digital games or entertainment, contributing to its escalating popularity; and growth in ecommerce and digital business opportunities. Management believes that the metaverse offers a new domain for businesses to engage with consumers, driving its adoption in various sectors, including retail, real estate, and marketing.

Integration of Virtual and Physical Worlds

One of the key trends in the metaverse industry is the growing integration of virtual and physical worlds, enabling users to seamlessly transition between digital and real-world experiences. This trend is evident in: (i) the emergence of virtual marketplaces where users can trade digital assets and purchase real world goods; (ii) the incorporation of AR and VR technologies in retail, entertainment, and other industries, providing immersive, interactive experiences that blur the lines between the digital and physical realms; (iii) the development of virtual environments that replicate real world locations, allowing users to explore and interact with digital versions of familiar places; and (iv) the integration of virtual and physical realms in the metaverse presents new opportunities for businesses to reach and engage with their target audiences in both spaces.

Virtual Economies and Markets

The metaverse industry is witnessing the rise of virtual economies and markets, where users can trade digital assets, such as virtual real estate, digital art, and unique collectibles. Key factors driving this trend include: development of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, enabling transparent transactions in digital markets; growing interest in non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) and digital collectibles, which has led to the creation of new marketplaces and trading platforms for these assets; the realization of the potential for virtual goods to hold and accrue value over time; expanding opportunities for creative expression and entrepreneurship within the metaverse, incentivizing users to participate in virtual economies and trade digital assets; increasing global connectivity and internet penetration, enabling a larger user base to engage in virtual economies and markets, and collaborations between established brands and the metaverse industry, introducing real-world businesses and their customer bases to virtual economies and markets.

Socialization and Community Building in Digital Spaces

The importance of socialization and community building in digital spaces is another significant trend in the metaverse industry. As users spend more time in virtual environments, platforms are placing a greater emphasis on fostering connections and interactions among users. This trend can be observed in: the creation of social hubs, virtual events, and gatherings designed to bring users together and encourage networking, collaboration, and communication; the integration of social media and messaging features within metaverse platforms, allowing users to stay connected with friends and communities while exploring virtual worlds; the development of user-generated content and customization tools, empowering users to create unique experiences and contribute to the growth and expansion of the metaverse; implementation of voice and video chat and real-time communication features, enhancing the sense of presence and fostering more immersive social experiences in virtual environments; collaboration between brands, influencers, and metaverse platforms to host virtual events, concerts, and exhibitions, creating shared experiences and strengthening community bonds and virtual education and learning communities, providing opportunities for knowledge sharing, skill development, and collaborative learning in the metaverse.

The metaverse industry is experiencing rapid growth and transformation, driven by, among other factors, technological advancements, increased user adoption, and the emergence of virtual economies and markets. As the industry continues to evolve, it will be essential that BNC stay informed of key trends and driving forces shaping the future of the metaverse landscape and adapt to those trends as they arise.

Business Operations

BNC’s focuses on delivering a comprehensive, immersive, and interconnected metaverse experience. To achieve this, management has identified several core strategic initiatives that will guide the Platform’s growth and development.

Technological Innovation and User Experience

BNC places a strong emphasis on leveraging technology to create a user-friendly experience. By offering a browser-based platform that is compatible with VR headsets and other modern devices, BNC aims to ensure accessibility and convenience for users across various platforms. BNC intends to continuously invest in research and development to aim to stay at the forefront of technological advancements in the metaverse space, and work to ensure that users enjoy an unparalleled experience.


Diversification and Personalization

BNC’s strategy focuses on providing a diverse range of products and experiences that caters to users with different interests and preferences. By planning to offer a wide variety of activities, from virtual markets and real world goods marketplaces to gaming and tournaments, social interaction, world building, and live and virtual events, the Platform aims to attract a broad user base and promote user engagement. Additionally, BNC intends to emphasize personalization, allowing users to customize their experiences and tailor the Platform to suit their particular needs and tastes.

Community Building and Global Connections

BNC recognizes the importance of fostering a strong sense of community and global connectivity among the Platform’s users. BNC intends to implement various features and initiatives designed to encourage socialization, collaboration, and networking among users from around the world. This will include the creation of social hubs, support for user-generated content, teams and communities, and the promotion of events and activities that bring users together.

Monetization and Revenue Generation

BNC’s business strategy includes developing diverse revenue streams to help ensure the Platform’s long-term sustainability and growth. Potential monetization strategies include charging fees for premium features, from sales and transactions on virtual markets and real world goods marketplaces, social sweepstakes gaming, real and virtual concerts and events, third party vendors and creators, and offering advertising opportunities for brands within the metaverse. Additionally, the Platform will explore partnerships and collaborations with other businesses and organizations to create new revenue-generating opportunities.

Compliance and Regulatory Management

To navigate the complex and evolving regulatory landscape, BNC will prioritize compliance with relevant laws and regulations in all jurisdictions where it operates. This includes data privacy and protection regulations, gaming, gambling, and sweepstakes regulations, and intellectual property rights. By maintaining a strong focus on regulatory compliance, BNC aims to minimize potential legal risks and build trust with users and partners.

Continuous Improvement and Adaptability

Finally, BNC’s business strategy emphasizes the importance of continuously evaluating and refining its offerings in response to changing market trends and user preferences. The Platform plans to actively seek user feedback and monitor industry developments to inform its ongoing product development and feature enhancements. This adaptability will, in management’s opinion, allow BNC to maintain its competitive edge and continue delivering a compelling metaverse experience for users.

Competition

BNC faces competition from existing metaverse platforms and new entrants, where its key competitors include: established metaverse platforms, such as Decentraland, The Sandbox, and Second Life, as well as companies that focus on the development of metaverse tools and platforms such as META (formerly known as Facebook); gaming-focused platforms, like Fortnite and Roblox; mixed reality platforms, like Microsoft Mesh, and social media platforms that integrate metaverse elements, such as META’s Horizon platform. Should our Platform gain widespread adoption, future competition may arise from additional competitors, including tech giants such as Apple, Google, or Amazon, which have the resources and infrastructure to develop their own metaverse platforms and ecosystems.

Market Segments and Niches

The metaverse industry can be broadly divided into several market segments and niches, each catering to different user needs and preferences: (i) gaming-focused metaverse platforms, such as Fortnite and Roblox, primarily cater to gamers and offer a wide range of gaming experiences and social interaction opportunities within virtual environments; (ii) in terms of VR and AR platforms, companies like META and Microsoft focus on developing hardware and software solutions to enable immersive VR and AR experiences, driving the adoption of these technologies in the metaverse; (iii) social and community-driven metaverse platforms like Second Life and BNC emphasize socialization, community building, and user-generated content, fostering connections and collaboration among users; and (iv) NFT and digital asset marketplaces, where these platforms, such as OpenSea and Decentraland, facilitate the trading of digital assets like virtual real estate, digital art, and unique collectibles, and thereby contribute to the growth of virtual economies. Meanwhile, hardware and platform developers, including Nvidia and Unity, serve as technology providers for numerous companies aiming to penetrate the metaverse market. Additionally, they are actively engaged in the development of their own metaverse platforms.


Differentiating Factors

With the increasing competition in the metaverse industry, it is crucial for BNC to differentiate itself by offering compelling features, experiences, or technologies. Some potential differentiating factors include:

Innovative and user-friendly technology: BNC prioritizes cutting-edge technology in an effort to deliver a seamless, intuitive user experience that we believe will have a competitive edge in the metaverse market;

Personalization and customization: BNC will empower users to create and customize their own experiences, environments, and avatars allowing us to appeal to a broader audience and foster greater user engagement;

Diverse offerings and experiences: BNC will cater to a wide range of interests and preferences, such as gaming, shopping, socializing, and trading digital assets, that can attract a more extensive and diverse user base;

Interoperability: BNC supports interoperability, enabling users to carry their assets, identities, and experiences across multiple virtual environments seamlessly using almost any modern browser, on a device that supports those browsers “this includes IOS, Android, PC, Consoles and more”; and

Economic opportunities: BNC provides users with the ability to earn real-world value through virtual activities, such as owning virtual real estate or digital assets, and competitions with real world rewards.

The metaverse industry is characterized by a competitive landscape with numerous users, market segments, and niches. To succeed in this rapidly evolving market, BNC must continuously innovate and differentiate itself, by offering unique features, experiences, and technologies that cater to the diverse needs and preferences of users.

Regulatory Environment

BNC operates within a complex and evolving regulatory landscape, with key considerations including: data privacy and protection regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”); compliance with gaming, gambling, and sweepstakes regulations in various jurisdictions; and intellectual property rights and digital asset ownership.

BNC intends to offer a transformative digital experience by combining elements of virtual markets, real world goods marketplaces, gaming, social activities, world and personal spaces building, and sweepstakes gaming. We believe this unique integration will establish the Platform as a pioneer in the metaverse industry, catering to diverse user interests and needs. We believe that as the industry evolves and expands, BNC’s commitment to providing immersive and interconnected digital experiences will place it at the forefront of the metaverse revolution. By continuously innovating and adapting to the ever-changing digital landscape, BNC aims to offer limitless possibilities and opportunities for users, setting the stage for a truly inclusive and dynamic metaverse.

As the metaverse industry continues to grow and evolve, regulatory challenges and considerations are becoming increasingly important and additional or changing regulations may increase BNC’s costs. The unique nature of the metaverse, which often combines elements of virtual reality, gaming, social networking, and digital economies, presents a complex landscape for regulators to navigate.

Present Regulatory Challenges

The metaverse industry is currently grappling with several regulatory challenges, including:

Data Privacy and Security: As users share personal information and engage in transactions within the metaverse, concerns about data privacy and security are paramount. Regulators must ensure that platforms adhere to existing data protection regulations, such as GDPR and the CCPA;


Intellectual Property Rights: The metaverse’s reliance on user-generated content and digital assets raises questions about intellectual property rights and the enforcement of copyright, trademark, and patent laws in virtual environments;

Taxation and Financial Regulations: The growth of virtual economies and the increasing popularity of cryptocurrencies and NFTs have raised questions about taxation and financial regulations. Regulators must determine how to classify and tax digital assets and transactions, as well as ensure compliance with anti-money laundering and know-your-customer regulations; and

Content Moderation and Liability: Metaverse platforms face challenges in moderating content and managing user behavior, raising questions about the platforms’ liability for user-generated content and potential violations of existing laws, such as those related to hate speech, harassment, and misinformation.

Future Regulatory Challenges

As the metaverse industry continues to develop and expand, several future regulatory challenges are likely to emerge, including:

Cross-border jurisdictional issues: With the metaverse being a global, borderless environment, determining jurisdiction and applying national laws to activities and transactions within the metaverse will become increasingly complex;

Virtual reality and augmented reality regulations: As VR and AR technologies become more integrated into the metaverse, new regulations may be needed to address issues related to safety, privacy, and ethical considerations in the use of these technologies;

Decentralization and governance: The increasing trend towards decentralized metaverse platforms raises questions about governance and regulatory oversight, as traditional regulatory mechanisms may not be applicable or effective in these environments;

Ethics and inclusivity: As the metaverse becomes more intertwined with daily life, ethical considerations related to inclusivity, accessibility, and the potential for digital divides will become increasingly important for regulators to address;

AI Ethics: As artificial intelligence is likely to play a significant role in the functioning and moderation of the metaverse, regulating AI ethics will be critical. This includes preventing algorithmic bias, ensuring transparency in AI decision-making, and protecting against harmful AI behavior; and

Digital Identity: Managing and protecting the identities of individuals in the metaverse could be a complex issue. It will be critical to balance anonymity and freedom of expression with the need for accountability to prevent malicious behavior.

Glossary of Terms

Virtual Reality: Virtual Reality (VR) refers to a computer-generated simulation or environment that can be experienced and interacted with using specialized hardware, such as headsets or gloves. It immerses users in a digital world that can replicate real-world or fantastical settings, providing a sense of presence and allowing for realistic, interactive experiences.


Metaverse Industry: The metaverse industry refers to the collective ecosystem of companies, technologies, and platforms involved in creating and developing the metaverse. The metaverse is a virtual universe or interconnected network of digital spaces where users can interact with each other and digital objects in real time. It aims to provide a shared, immersive, and persistent digital environment that transcends traditional online experiences.

Digital Economies: Digital economies refer to the virtual economies that exist within online platforms, games, or virtual worlds. They involve the exchange of digital goods, services, or currencies, which can have real-world value. In these economies, users can engage in various economic activities, such as buying and selling virtual items, earning virtual currencies, or participating in virtual marketplaces.

Augmented Reality: Augmented Reality (“AR”) is a Nevada corporation incorporatedtechnology that overlays digital information or virtual elements onto the real-world environment. AR enhances the user's perception of the physical world by integrating computer-generated graphics, sounds, or other sensory inputs into their view, typically through the use of smartphones, tablets, or AR glasses. It blends virtual content with the real world, providing an interactive and enriched experience.

Mixed Reality: Mixed Reality (“MR”) refers to the merging of real-world and virtual elements to create new environments and visualizations where physical and digital objects coexist and interact in real time. MR combines elements of both virtual reality and augmented reality, allowing users to experience and manipulate virtual objects within their physical surroundings. It enables a seamless integration of the real and virtual worlds, enhancing the user's perception and interactions.

Digital Character Skins: Digital character skins are virtual cosmetic items or appearances that can be applied to a character or avatar in a video game, virtual world, or online platform. These skins are purely aesthetic and do not affect gameplay mechanics. They allow users to customize the visual appearance of their digital persona, often offering unique designs, costumes, or visual effects that can be acquired or purchased within the virtual environment.

Non-Fungible Tokens: Non-Fungible Tokens (“NFTs”) are digital assets that represent ownership or proof of authenticity of a unique item or piece of content. Unlike cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, which are fungible and interchangeable, NFTs are distinct and indivisible. They are typically based on November 19, 2007 that has developed overblockchain technology, providing a transparent way to verify ownership and track the past three years through key acquisitions described belowprovenance of digital assets, such as artwork, collectibles, virtual real estate, or in-game items. NFTs have gained popularity for their potential to revolutionize digital ownership and organic growth. Ecoark Holdings is an innovative, emerging growth company focused onenable creators to monetize their digital creations.

AI (Artificial Intelligence): Artificial Intelligence refers to the development of computer systems that can perform tasks that typically require human intelligence. AI involves the creation of algorithms and deploymentmodels that enable machines to perceive, reason, learn, and make decisions or predictions based on data. It encompasses various subfields such as machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision, and robotics. AI aims to replicate or augment human intelligence to solve complex problems, automate processes, and improve efficiency across different domains.

Machine Learning: Machine Learning is a subset of business solutionsAI that focuses on developing algorithms and productsmodels that enable computers to learn from data and make predictions or decisions without being explicitly programmed. ML algorithms learn patterns, relationships, and insights from training data, allowing them to generalize and make predictions or take actions on new, unseen data. It involves techniques such as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning. Machine learning has applications in various fields, including image recognition, natural language processing, recommendation systems, and predictive analytics.


Digital Identity: Digital identity refers to the retail, agriculture, food service, commercial real estateonline representation of an individual or entity within digital systems or platforms. It encompasses the collection of personal information, attributes, and architecture, engineeringcredentials that uniquely identify an individual in the digital realm. Digital identity can include various elements, such as usernames, passwords, biometric data, email addresses, and construction end markets. Ecoark Holdings has assembledsocial media profiles. It plays a teamcrucial role in online authentication, access control, and portfoliopersonalized experiences across a range of proprietary, patented technologiesdigital services, including social media, e-commerce, banking, and government platforms. Digital identity management involves the secure and responsible handling of personal information to address the wasteensure privacy and protect against identity theft or misuse.

Corporate Information

BNC was incorporated in operations, logistics and supply chain. Ecoark Holdings accomplishes this through two wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Ecoark, Inc. (“Ecoark”) and Magnolia Solar, Inc. (“Magnolia Solar”). Further, Ecoark has three operating subsidiaries: Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs”), Eco3d, LLC (“Eco3d”) and Pioneer Products, LLC (“Pioneer Products” or “Pioneer”). The Company has 117 employees as of the date of this filing.

OurNevada on January 9, 2023. BNC’s principal executive offices are located at 3333 S. Pinnacle Hills303 Pearl Parkway Suite 220, Rogers, Arkansas 72758,200, San Antonio, TX 78215, and our telephone number is (479) 259-2977. Our(800) 762-7293. As of March 31, 2023, BNC had 17 employees, including ten full-time employees.

BNC’s website address is http://ecoarkusa.com/. Ourwww.bitnile.com. BNC’s website and the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, ourthat website will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in and are not considered part of this report.Annual Report.

 

Reverse Acquisition/MergerAgora

 

On January 29, 2016, EcoarkFollowing the Company’s sale of Trend Holdings, (previously Magnolia Solar Corporation – “MSC”)Agora’s only operating subsidiary, Bitstream, engages in the hosting of digital asset miners for the mining of Bitcoin.

Bitstream

Bitstream was originally organized to be our Bitcoin mining subsidiary. Due to regulatory challenges and delays with its planned initial public offering, Bitstream transitioned its business model from digital asset mining to hosting. Bitstream also divested all Bitcoin holdings. Bitstream entered into an Agreementthe aforementioned MSA with BitNile Inc. but due to limited capital has not been able to fulfill the terms of that MSA. The Company is devoting the majority of its capital going forward to its core business of the Platform and Planis not confident that Bitstream will become a viable hosting company in the future.

Zest Labs

Through its wholly owned subsidiary Zest, the Company has developed intellectual property that can offer freshness management solutions for fresh food growers, suppliers, processors, distributors, grocers and restaurants. The Company idled Zest’s operations in conjunction with litigation that was filed against Walmart and Deloitte for trade secret violations; the action against Deloitte was subsequently dismissed. In lieu of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Ecoark. Pursuantconducting operations in Zest, the Company is actively pursuing various licensing or sale opportunities of its intellectual property. As previously noted, the Company intends to transfer all of the Merger Agreement, Ecoark merged with andcommon stock of Zest into a subsidiaryZest Holdings, which will own all of Ecoark Holdings (the “Merger”). Ecoark and Magnolia Solar continuethe intellectual property of Zest as well as the subsidiariesrights to any current and businesses of Ecoark Holdings.future intellectual property litigation by Zest.

 

From a legal perspective, Magnolia Solar Corporation acquired Ecoark; however,


Competition

The Company faces intense competition with respect to its products and services in compliance with financial accounting standards, the transaction was accounted for as a “reverse acquisition”all markets in which it was treated asoperates.

For a discussion on BNC competition see Business Overview for BNC above.

Sales and Marketing

Through the Platform, the Company intends to generate revenues through the sale of tokens or coins that provide the end user with interactive entertainment (game play) and durable goods principally for the PC and mobile platforms.

In fiscal year 2023, Bitstream changed its business model from digital asset mining to digital asset hosting. Bitstream has generated no revenue during 2023.

Government Regulations

Set forth below is an acquisition of Magnolia Solar Corporation by Ecoark. Thus, the historical information presented prior to March 24, 2016 (the closing dateoverview of the Merger) is thatgovernment regulations we presently face or could face as a result of Ecoark.our current and planned operations. As the regulatory and legal environment evolves, we may become subject to new laws, such as further regulation by the SEC and other agencies, which may affect our hosting and other activities. For additional discussion regarding our belief about the potential risks existing and future regulation pose to our business, see “Risk Factors.”

 

1

For a discussion of BNC government regulation see Business Overview for BNC above.

Agora

Although there was a period of regulatory uncertainty ending in 2018, we believe that the SEC will not claim that Bitcoin is a security and therefore that Bitcoin will not be subject to the SEC’s regulation. The SEC has been active in pursuing its regulation of other cryptocurrencies by filing lawsuits and, more recently, administratively against a cryptocurrency that tried to register under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Further, the SEC’s chairman has given a number of speeches seeking firm regulatory authority over cryptocurrencies. Whether Congress will enact new legislation in this area is uncertain, although in June 2022, bipartisan legislation was introduced in the Senate. However, enhanced regulation may adversely affect our future Bitcoin hosting and other cryptocurrency activities. Moreover, there is a risk that the SEC may seek a way to regulate Bitcoin as a security.

Blockchain and Bitcoin are increasingly becoming subject to governmental regulation, both in the U.S. and internationally. State and local regulations also may apply to our activities and other activities in which we may participate in the future. Other governmental or semi-governmental regulatory bodies have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in the blockchain or cryptocurrency business. For instance, the Cyber-Digital Task Force of the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) published a report entitled “Cryptocurrency: An Enforcement Framework” in October 2020. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the possible threats and enforcement challenges the DOJ views as associated with the use and prevalence of cryptocurrency, as well as the regulatory and investigatory means the DOJ has at its disposal to deal with these possible threats and challenges.

Presently, we do not believe any U.S. or state regulatory body has taken any action or position adverse to Bitcoin with respect to its production, sale, and use as a medium of exchange; however, future changes to existing regulations or entirely new regulations may affect our business in ways it is not presently possible for us to predict with any reasonable degree of reliability.

For example, in 2021 China banned Bitcoin mining. Additionally, lawmakers in New York recently approved legislation which would impose a two-year moratorium on certain cryptocurrency mining, including Bitcoin.

Although Bitstream is no longer actively engaged in digital asset mining, regulations affecting Bitcoin and other digital assets have a direct impact on its hosting business model. See “Risk Factors” at page 29 of this Report.


 

 

PriorEnvironmental Compliance

The Company’s core operations through the Platform are virtual in nature and have minimal environmental impact, if any.

Our operations through Agora’s subsidiary Bitstream, are or may become subject to numerous laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and climate change. These laws and regulations change frequently, and the effect of these changes is often to impose additional costs or other restrictions on our operations. We cannot predict the occurrence, timing, nature or effect of these changes. We also operate under a number of environmental permits and authorizations. The issuing agencies may take the position that some or all of these permits and authorizations are subject to modification, suspension, or revocation under certain circumstances.

While we are currently not experiencing any material expenses related to the completionenvironmental compliance, we may become subject to environmental or other related laws and regulations in the future, which may result from a number of causes, the likelihood of which would increase should we determine to initiate Bitcoin mining operations and/or due to new regulations being considered. Please review the Risk Factors in Item 1A of this Report and the paragraph that follows with regard to potential environmental and other compliance expenses.

On March 21, 2022, the SEC released proposed rule changes on climate-related disclosure. The proposed rule changes would require registrants, including the Company, to include certain climate-related disclosures in registration statements and periodic reports, including information about climate-related risks that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on the registrant’s business, results of operations, or financial condition, and certain climate-related financial statement metrics in a note to their audited financial statements. The required information about climate-related risks would include disclosure of a registrant’s greenhouse gas emissions, information about climate-related targets and goals, and transition plan, if any, and extensive attestation requirements. The proposed new rules would also require companies to disclose multiple levels of climate impact, including primary direct impacts from the registrant’s own operations, as well as secondary and tertiary effects of the Merger on March 24, 2016,operations and uses by contractors that the registrant utilizes and end-users of the registrant’s products and/or services. If adopted as proposed, the rule changes will result in material additional compliance and reporting costs, including monitoring, collecting, analyzing and reporting the new metrics and implementing systems and hiring additional internal and external personnel with the requisite skills and expertise to serve those functions. We expect that the rules will be adopted in large part at least, and our compliance costs will be material. However, following a special shareholder meeting on March 18, 2016,June 2022 U.S. Supreme Court administrative decision, we expect a court challenge to any final rule promulgated by the following actions to amendSEC. We cannot predict the Articlesoutcome of Incorporation were undertaken by Ecoark Holdings to:any such challenge.

1.effect a change in the name of the company from Magnolia Solar Corporation to Ecoark Holdings, Inc.;

 

Intellectual Property

2.effect a reverse stock split of the common stock by a ratio of one-for-two hundred fifty shares (1 for 250);

 

3.effect an increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to 100,000; and

4.effect the creation of 5,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock.

After giving effectThe Company owns all of the intellectual property to the Merger and the issuance of common stockPlatform. BNC’s software provider, MeetKai, owns various patents related to the shareholders of Ecoark, the shareholders of Ecoark received approximately 95% of the shares of Ecoark Holding’s common stock.metaverse which may or may not be transferred to BNC at a future date.

Description of Business

Ecoark Holdings operatesThe Company through two wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Ecoark and Magnolia Solar. Further, Ecoark has three operating subsidiaries: Zest Labs, Eco3d and Pioneer Products.

Zest Labs

Zest Labs’ Zest Data Services is a secure, multi-tenant cloud-based data collection platform for aggregating and real-time permission-based sharing and analysis of information. Zest Fresh, a fresh food management solution that utilizes the Zest Data Service platform, focuses on three primary value propositions – consistent food quality, reduced waste, and improved food safety. Zest Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence on every pallet of delivered fresh food. Zest Delivery offers real-time monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food. Zest Labs was previously known as Intelleflex Corporation. Effective on October 28, 2016, Intelleflex Corporation changed its name to Zest Labs, Inc. to align its corporate name with its mission and the brand name of its products and services.

The Zest Fresh value proposition is to reduce fresh food loss by improving quality consistency. In the U.S. produce market, it is reported that roughly 30% of post-harvest fresh food is lost or wasted and therefore not consumed. Both fresh food producers and retailers bear significant expense when harvested food is either rejected due to early spoilage, or reduced in value due to early ripening. Zest Labs believes that a significant portion of this waste can be attributed to inconsistent quality or freshness based on variable post-harvest processing and handling. Fresh food producers and retailers manage food distribution and inventory based on the harvest date, with the assumption that all food harvested on the same day will have the same freshness. However, studies have shown that post-harvest handling can have a significant effect on the actual remaining freshness, and if not properly accounted for, can result in food loss or spoilage ahead of expectations. Zest Fresh empowers fresh food producers and retailers to significantly reduce the post-harvest loss by providing real-time guidance to process adherence, intelligent distribution and best handling practices, thereby providing significant savings to fresh food producers and retailers.

Zest Fresh is offered to fresh food producers and retailers with pricing based on the number of pallets managed by Zest, typically from the field harvest through retail delivery. The Zest service includes a re-usable wireless sensor device that travels with the pallet of fresh food from the field through retail delivery, continuously collecting product condition data. The collected pallet product data is analyzed in real time by the Zest Fresh cloud application, with the fresh food producers and retailers accessing data through Zest web and mobile applications. Zest Fresh provides workers with real-time feedback on the current handling or processing of each pallet, empowering best practice adherence to achieve maximum freshness. Zest Fresh also provides real-time updates as to actual product freshness for each pallet, enabling intelligent routing and inventory management of each pallet in a manner that ensures optimum delivered freshness.

Zest Delivery manages prepared food delivery from the restaurant through to the customer. Zest Delivery manages the delivery container environment, both monitoring and controlling the product condition. The value of Zest Delivery is to manage prepared meals in an ideal state for consumption, while accommodating extended pre-staging or delivery times. Extended pre-staging times are associated with “instant delivery” services of prepared meals, where the meals are often pre-staged in a delivery area ahead of demand. While pre-staging enables fast demand response time, it can result in prepared meals being staged for extended periods. Zest Delivery monitors and controls the delivery container environment to preserve the prepared meal in ideal, ready to consume condition. Zest Delivery also provides the dispatcher with real-time remote visibility to the condition of available meals, and confirming quality prior to dispatch. Zest Delivery provides automated, real-time visibility for a very distributed fleet of drivers, reflecting prepared meal food safety, quality and availability. Zest Delivery is offered to meal delivery companies based on the quantity of delivery containers and frequency of use.

Zest Labs, currently holds rights to 6575 U.S. patents (with additional patents pending), numerous related foreign patents, and U.S. copyrights relating to certain aspects of its Zest Labs software, hardware devices including Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”)RFID technology, software, and services. In addition, Zest Labs has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services,” and the Zest, logo,Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery logos, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Many of Zest Labs’Zest’s products have been designed to include licensed intellectual property obtained from third-parties.third parties. Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate, subject to the outcome of pending litigation and financing and, are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates.

2

Dependence on Major Customers

From time-to-time we have had and may continue to have customers generating 10 percent or more of the Company’s consolidated revenues, and loss of such customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, we did not recognize any revenue from continuing operations, so a customer concentration risk would not be applicable.

Human Capital

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have 6 full-time employees dedicated to all operations other than BNC. BNC had 17 employees, including ten full-time employees.


 

 

Our ability to successfully execute our strategic initiatives is highly dependent on recruiting and retaining skilled personnel. Our compensation philosophy is based on incentivizing and rewarding performance, with alignment of individual, corporate, and shareholder interests. Compensation includes salaries, benefits, and equity participation. Our owner operator drivers are not salaried employees.

We are committed to the health, safety, and well-being of our employees and drivers. We follow applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and guidance.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to ensure that all employees maintain the highest standards of business conduct in every aspect of their dealings with each other, customers, suppliers, vendors, service providers, shareholders, and governmental authorities.

We believe our relations with our employees and drivers are satisfactory.

Proposed Spin-Offs

As previously discussed, the spin-off of the legacy non-core subsidiaries is subject to various factors. Although most components essentialWhite River and Banner Midstream were divested and transferred to Zest Labs’ businessWTRV in July 2022 and Wolf Energy in September 2022, respectively, in reverse merger transactions, the planned and announced stock dividends to the Company shareholders of record as of September 30, 2022 is subject to the SEC’s approval of Form S-1 registration statements for WTRV and Wolf Energy, which are generally availablestill undergoing review by the SEC. The Company still has full intentions to distribute 100% of the common stock it received from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID custom integrated circuits,Wolf Energy and application-specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”) are currently obtained bycommon stock it will receive from WTRV upon the conversion of preferred stock, upon the effectiveness of the aforementioned Form S-1’s.

The spin-off of Zest Labs from single or limited sources, principallyinto Zest Holdings is expected to occur prior to quarter-end September 30, 2023.

As previously noted, the Company made the decision in Asia.

Zest Labs is part of a very competitive industry that markets solutionsJanuary 2023 to cold supply chain users, such as fresh food growers and retailers. Many other companies, that are both more established and have much greater resources compete in this market. While Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery offer new technical approaches and new user value, it remains uncertain if Zest Labsterminate Agora’s planned initial public offering. Instead, Agora will gain sufficient adoption of its products to make them viableremain in the market. Further, it is unclear what industry competitors are developing that might address similar user needs. Zest Labs’ products provide a new approach for industry participants, and as with any new approach, adoption is uncertain as many in the industry can be slow to embrace new technology and/or new approaches. These market challenges can lead to extended sales cycles, that may include extended pilot testing often at Zest Labs’ expense, for which the outcome remains unclear until the completion of each test. For these reasons, and others, forecasting new business adoption and future revenue can be very difficult and volatile. 

Eco3d

Eco3d is a services-based company that utilizes LiDAR laser scanning technology to capture existing conditions from natural or man-made structures by creating a 3d data point cloud. These point clouds represent highly accurate dimensional data clearly identifying the X, Y, and Z location from the scanner that emitted millions of points of light from a single position. Eco3d scans the same subject area from different positions to provide even more 3d data. The raw data is registered/meshed together to create a federated data set that is then used to create 2d deliverables or 3d models. 

This process represents one of the fastest and most accurate forms of non-contact 3d measurement. The value proposition that Eco3d provides involves utilizing this technology to ultimately save money on labor and materials as it relates to project costs. Secondary, but significant additional propositions include measuring at a distance to maintain the safety of the workforce; helping quality assurance or assessment and control of a structure for overall asset management over the life of a project; providing meta-data to be used in the maintenance of the structure; providing virtual design validation; and communicating the existing conditions to allow for prototype solutions. 

Eco3d provides this measuring service throughout North America to clients who want to improve their short-term and long-term operational efficiency. The primary markets are construction, manufacturing, real estate, retail, energy, high purity, and healthcare. All of these industries are in their infancy of utilizing this technology which also makes Eco3d their consultant on the integration of this new technology and proprietary processes. The revenue sources from these existing and target industries represent significant market opportunity. Furthermore, this technology will form the basis for the upcoming democratization of augmented reality and virtual reality. The opportunities for integration know no boundaries geographically, politically, or economically. We live in a 3-dimensional world and this is one of the fastest, least expensive, forms of digitizing/computerizing technology.

Pioneer Products

Pioneer Products began by creating new consumer products using plastic reclaimed from post-consumer and retailers’ waste streams. One of these products is Pioneer Products’ “close-looped” 45-gallon trash can. Pioneer Products generates revenue from the sale of products such as plastic trash cans to 3,700 retail stores, including the largest retailer in the continental U.S., Walmart, a major customer of the Company. Pioneer Products’ competitors include large consumer products companies such as Rubbermaid and Hefty. 

Building on a platform of proven retail success, Pioneer Products leverages its reputation and strategic network by actingCompany as a broker for other productsmajority owned subsidiary due to potential synergies which could be achieved with BNC.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 78215, and companies that fit into its brand portfolio. Pioneer owns direct vendor relationshipsour telephone number is (800) 762-7293. Our website address is http://bitnile.net/. Our website and vendor numbers with some of the largest retailers in the U.S. This vendor number facilitates introduction of a new product to a retailer. Additionally, Pioneer’s offerings enable Ecoark to play a key role in supporting and making goodinformation contained on, some of Walmart’s goals of retail-level sustainability: reduction of waste within its supply chain and operations. 

On May 3, 2016, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC (“Sable”) was acquired by Ecoark Holdings and Pioneer Products for 2,000 shares of Ecoark Holdings common stock. Sable is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products.Sable specializes in the purchase, sale, and processing of post-consumer and post-industrial plastic materials. It provides services to a variety of customers and suppliers throughout the plastics processing industry, from small extruders, molders and scrap collectors to large corporations.

Magnolia Solar

Magnolia Solar is principally engaged in the development and commercialization of nanotechnology-based, high-efficiency, thin-film technologyor that can be deposited on a variety of substrates, including glassaccessed through, our website will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in and flexible structures. Magnolia Solar believes that this technology has the potential to capture a largerare not considered part of the solar spectrum to produce high-efficiency solar cells and incorporates a unique nanostructure-based antireflection coating technology to possibly further increase the solar cell’s performance. If these goals are met, there is the potential of significantly reducing the cost per watt. Since its inception, Magnolia Solar has not generated material revenues or earnings as a result of its activities. 

Competition

The Company’s subsidiaries operate in markets for products and services that are highly competitive and face aggressive competition in all areas of their business. 

The market for cloud-based, real-time supply chain analytic solutions—the market in which Zest Labs competes—is rapidly evolving. There are several new competitors with competing technologies, including companies that have greater resources than Ecoark Holdings, which operate in this space. Some of these companies have brand recognition, established relationships with retailers, and own the manufacturing process. 

Eco3d competes in the market for building information modeling for owners, architects, engineers, planners, surveyors, developers, and contractors for redevelopment, civil engineering, and other requirements. The market for these services is highly competitive with several large companies competing. Many large potential customers have their own teams that perform similar functions for their requirements, limiting access to some market participants. Annual Report.

3


 

 

Pioneer Products competes in the market for recycled products to support sustainability programs of its customers. There are currently hundreds of sustainability programs available in the market. These programs are offered through retailers, manufacturers, and service providers. Several competitors operating in this industry are vertically integrated and offer recycled products similar to those sold by Pioneer.

The market for electricity from renewable sources—the market in which Magnolia Solar competes—is still evolving and is dependent on government incentives and subsidies in the U.S. Several large companies and some foreign nation states aggressively compete to expand their portfolio of products/services for renewable energy solutions. Intense competition in the solar power energy sector has created financial pressures for many market participants.

Ecoark Holdings believes that, analyzing the competitive factors affecting the market for the solutions and services its subsidiaries provide, its products/services compete favorably by offering integrated solutions to their customers. The Company has incurred research and development expenses of $5,979 and $2,801 in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to develop its solutions and differentiate those solutions from competitive offerings. 

ItemITEM 1A. Risk FactorsRISK FACTORS

There are numerous risks affecting our business, some of which are beyond our control.

An investment in our common stock involves a high degreesignificant risks. You should carefully consider the following risks and all other information set forth in this Annual Report before deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the events or developments described below occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer. In that case, the value of our common stock may decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

You should consider each of the following risk factors and any other information set forth in this Annual Report and the other reports filed by the Company with the SEC, including the Company’s financial statements and related notes, in evaluating the Company’s business and prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones that impact on the Company’s operations and business. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company, or that the Company currently considers immaterial, may not be appropriate for investors who cannot afford to lose their entire investment.also impair its business or operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, ouroccurs, the Company’s business and financial condition, results or operating resultsprospects could be materially harmed. This could causePlease also read carefully the tradingsection entitled “Note About Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this Annual Report.

Risks Relating to Our Company and Our Financial Condition

We have incurred net losses on an annual basis since our inception and may continue to experience losses and negative cash flow in the future.

As of July 10, 2023, we had cash (not including restricted cash) of approximately $3,492. We have not been profitable on an annual basis since inception and had previously incurred significant operating losses and negative cash flow from operations. We recorded a net loss of approximately $87,361,603 and $10,554,452 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022. In fiscal year 2023, our net loss was increased by non-cash net gain of approximately $32.9 million from a change in the fair value of our preferred stock and warrant derivative liabilities due to the weakness of our stock price and $14.4 million related to a day one derivative income on the Series B and Series C preferred stock issuances. Furthermore, in fiscal year 2023, our net loss was reduced by non-cash net losses of approximately $54.5 million and $20.7 million related to the loss on acquisition of BitNile and the change in fair value of the White River investment respectively. Fiscal year 2022 also had non-cash charges gains of approximately $15.4 million from a change in the fair value of our warrant derivative liabilities. We will likely continue to incur losses and experience negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future. If we cannot achieve positive cash flow from operations or net income, it may make it more difficult to raise capital based on our common stock to decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In addition to the risks outlined below, risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations.on acceptable terms.

Note that dollar amounts and numbers of shares that follow in this report are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.

Potential risks and uncertainties that could affect our operating results and financial condition include, without limitation, the following:

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR OPERATIONS

We have experienced losses since our founding. A failure to obtain profitability and achieve consistent positive cash flows would haveOur independent registered public accounting firm has issued a significant adverse effectgoing concern opinion on our business.

We have incurred operating losses since our inception, including a reported net loss attributable to controlling interest of $25,349 and $10,502 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $14,097 and $7,671, respectively. We expect to continue to incur operating losses through at least 2017. As of December 31, 2016, we had cash of $1,495, working capital of $1,470, and an accumulated deficit of $61,936. To date, we have funded our operations principally through the sale of our capital stock and debt instruments. We will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability, and we cannot assure you that we will ever realize revenues at such levels. If we do achieve profitability in any period, we may not be able to sustain or increase our profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

We require additional financing to support our operations. Such financing may only be available on disadvantageous terms, or may not be available at all. Any new equity financing could have a substantial dilutive effect on our existing stockholders.

At December 31, 2016, we had cash of $1,495, working capital of $1,470 and an accumulated deficit of $61,936. While we closed a $17,320 Private Offering on April 28, 2016, we will need to raise additional capital and our cash position may decline in the future. We may not be successful in maintaining an adequate level of cash resources. We continue to seek additional debt or equity financing in order to support our growing operations. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms, or at all, and any new equity financing could have a substantial dilutive effect on our existing stockholders. If we cannot obtain additional financing, we will not be able to achieve the sales growth that we need to cover our costs, and our results of operations would be negatively affected.

The Company raised additional debt and equity financing in 2017 as described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2023 as a result of our continued net losses, working capital deficiency, and filed an $80,000 shelf registration withaccumulated deficit.  

The accompanying financial statements for the SEC in 2016,year ended March 31, 2023 have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a portion of which has already been utilized. Obtaining additional financing andgoing concern, but the successful developmentability of the Company’s strategic plan to achieve profitability are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The Company is engaged in discussions with a potential major customer to significantly increase revenues and expand operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.concern depends on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it establishes a revenue stream and becomes profitable. Management’s plans to continue as a going concern include raising additional capital through sales of equity and debt securities. However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans. If the Company is not able to obtain the necessary additional financing on a timely basis, the Company will be required to delay, and reduce the scope of the Company’s development of its continuing operations. Continuing as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully secure other sources of financing and the ability to conduct profitable operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Because we will require additional capital and may resultneed or desire to engage in strategic transactions in the future to support the growth of our metaverse platform, and our inability to generate and obtain such capital or to enter into strategic transactions may be constrained due to, among other items, contractual limitations under the Series B and C preferred stock, our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects could be material and adversely affected.

The Company announced the termination of its ATM on June 16, 2023, as substantially all of the $3,500,000 proceeds had been raised by the Company through Ascendiant. As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company is exploring additional opportunities to generate capital to continue operating as a going concern but does not have any formal contractual agreements in place.

The certificates of designation of the Series A, B and C preferred stock contain certain provisions that limit our ability to act without the consent of their holder, AAI. This means that AAI could prevent us from entering into a strategic transaction even if we felt it was the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

Further, if we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing shareholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity or debt securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock.


We have substantial amounts of indebtedness. This indebtedness and the covenants contained in the Loan Agreements substantially limit our financial and operating flexibility. Further, conversions of the Notes will dilute the ownership interest of our existing shareholders.

On April 27, 2023, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”) providing for the issuance of (i) Senior Secured Convertible Notes (individually, a “Note” and collectively, the “Notes”) with an aggregate principal face amount of $6,875,000, which Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock (the “Conversion Shares”); and (ii) five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,100,905 shares of common stock. The maturity date of the Notes is April 27, 2024.

Pursuant to the SPA, we and certain of our subsidiaries and Arena Investors, LP, as the collateral agent on behalf of the Investors (the “Agent”) entered into a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), pursuant to which we (i) pledged the equity interests in our subsidiaries and (ii) granted to the Investors a security interest in, among other items, all of our deposit accounts, securities accounts, chattel paper, documents, equipment, general intangibles, instruments and inventory, and all proceeds therefrom (the “Assets”). In addition, pursuant to the Security Agreement, the subsidiaries granted to the Investors a security interest in its Assets and, pursuant to a subsidiary guarantees, jointly and severally agreed to guarantee and act as surety for our obligation to repay the Notes and other obligations under the SPA, the Notes and Security Agreement (collectively, the “Loan Agreements”).

The Notes have a principal face amount of $6,875,000 and bear no interest (unless an event of default occurs) as they were issued with an original issuance discount of $1,375,000. The maturity date of the Notes is April 27, 2024. The Notes are convertible, subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations, into Conversion Shares at a price per share equal to the lower of (i) $3.273 or (ii) the greater of (A) $0.504 and (B) 85% of the lowest volume weighted average price of our common stock during the ten (10) trading days prior to the date of conversion (the “Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price is subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of common stock at a price per share lower than the Conversion Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events.

The Loan Agreements contain standard and customary events of default including, but not limited to, failure to make payments when due under the Notes, failure to comply with certain covenants contained in the Loan Agreements, or our bankruptcy or insolvency. Such agreements contain restrictions that substantially limit our financial flexibility, over and above the negative covenants contained the transaction document relates to the Series A Preferred Stock, which themselves are substantial. These agreements place limits on our ability to (i) incur additional indebtedness or the Agent otherwise agrees, and (ii) grant security to third persons, among many other items. These restrictions limit our ability to finance our future operations and capital needs. In addition, our substantial indebtedness could require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow, if any, from the outcomeanticipated operations to making payments on our indebtedness and other liabilities, which would limit the availability of funds for working capital and other general corporate purposes; limit our flexibility in reacting to changes in the industries in which we operate or in our competitive environment; place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to those of our competitors who have less debt than we do, and limit our ability to borrow additional funds and increase the costs of any such additional borrowings. If we are unable to pay our debts, including the Notes as they become due and payable, we would become insolvent.

The conversion of some or all of the uncertainties.Notes will dilute the ownership interests of our existing shareholders. Any sales in the public market of our common stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the Notes would likely depress the price of our common stock.


We cannot predict our future results because we have a limitedvirtually no operating history.

Our direct wholly-owned subsidiaries, Ecoark and Magnolia Solar were formed

We acquired our metaverse business on November 28, 2011 and January 8, 2008, respectively. Ecoark began realizing revenues from operations in 2012. Magnolia Solar has not generated any significant revenue.March 6, 2023, which is the Company’s core business for future revenue growth. Given our highly limited operating history, it may be difficult to evaluate our future performance or prospects. You should consider the uncertainties that we may encounter as a company that should still be considered an early stageearly-stage company. These uncertainties include:

competition from other more established, better capitalized companies with longer track records in the metaverse, gaming, and sweepstakes businesses;

our ability to market our services and products for a profit;

our ability to recruit and retain skilled personnel;
our ability to secure and retain key customers;

our agreement with a third-party, MeetKai, for development and hosting services regarding the Platform;

our ability to adapt to changing market conditions; and

our evolving business model.

If we are not able to address successfully some or all of these uncertainties, we may not be able to expand our business, compete effectively or achieve profitability.

Because we must periodically evaluate our intangible assets and investment holdings for impairment, we could be required to recognize non-cash impairment charges in future periods which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

The Company incurred non-cash charges of $54.5 million and $20.7 million related to the loss on the acquisition of BNC as well as the change in fair value of its investment holding, pending dividend distribution, of White River. The Company will assess these investments for impairment going forward, and if the carrying value of the holding on the Company’s balance sheet exceeds its estimated fair value, we will record an impairment charge.

As of March 31, 2023, we had not generated revenue in the Company’s core business of the Platform, and the inability to generate significant revenue in this nascent business could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The Company had not generated any revenue from the Platform as of March 31, 2023, and the revenue generated during the first quarter of fiscal year 2024 has been minimal.

If the Company is unable to generate significant revenue in the near future related to gaming, sweepstakes, sponsorship or advertising within its metaverse platform then its business model in the metaverse will be difficult to fund through continuing operations and additional capital will need to be raised by the company to grow its business and continue operating its business as a going concern. Our contract with MeetKai has many performance obligations that, if breached, could impair our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we do not continue to satisfy the Nasdaq Stock Market’s continued listing requirements, our common stock could be delisted from the Nasdaq.

The listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq is contingent on our compliance with the Nasdaq’s conditions for continued listing. We are not presently in compliance with all such conditions, and it is possible that we will fail to meet one or more of these conditions in the future.

In connection with our acquisition of BNC on March 3, 2023 the Company received a letter from Nasdaq indicating that certain of the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock, which subject to various limitations are convertible into a combined total of 13,333,334 shares of the Company’s common stock, would constitute a change of control requiring shareholder approval under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5110. Specifically, Listing Rule 5110(a) states that “[a] Company must apply for initial listing in connection with a transaction whereby the Company combines with a non-Nasdaq entity, resulting in a change of control of the Company...” Nasdaq also asked certain questions and requested certain documents and information related to various aspects of the BitNile.com transaction and other matters, including the transaction’s valuation and the process by which it arose, was negotiation and closed.

Further, on June 21, 2023, the Company received a letter (the “Letter”) from Nasdaq notifying the Company that Nasdaq has determined that the Company has violated Nasdaq’s voting rights rule set forth in Listing Rule 5640 (the “Voting Rights Rule”). The alleged violation of the Voting Rights Rule relates to the issuance of (i) 8,637.5 shares of the newly designated Series B Preferred Stock and (ii) 1,362.5 shares of newly designated Series C Preferred Stock (collectively, the “Preferred Stock”) in connection with the acquisition of BNC as well as the securities of Earnity, Inc. beneficially owned by BitNile (collectively, the “Assets”) pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among the Company, AAI and certain employees of AAI, which was previously disclosed on Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 14, 2023 and March 10, 2023. The Preferred Stock has a collective stated value of $100,000,000 (the “Stated Value”), and votes on an as-converted basis, representing approximately 92.4% of the Company’s outstanding voting power on a fully diluted basis at the time of issuance, assuming shareholder approval for the voting of these shares.

4

 

 

According to the Letter, because the Preferred Stock was not issued for cash, Nasdaq compared the value of the Assets to the Stated Value and determined that the value of the Assets was less than the Stated Value and that the voting rights attributable to the Preferred Stock has the effect of disparately reducing the voting rights of the Company’s existing shareholders. The Staff looked at the total assets and shareholders’ equity of BNC as of March 5, 2023, as well as the market capitalization of AAI prior to entering into the Agreement and immediately after closing of the transaction in determining, in Nasdaq’s opinion, the value of the Assets. The Letter did not make any reference to the projections prepared by AAI as to the future potential of the business of BNC nor to the fairness opinion that we obtained from an independent party prior to closing of the transaction, which supported the Stated Value of the Preferred Stock for the total value of the Assets, both of which the Company provided to the Staff prior to receipt of the Letter.

Recent sales

According to the Letter, Nasdaq determined that the voting rights of the Preferred Stock, voting on an as-converted basis, are below the minimum price per share of the Common Stock at the time of the issuance of the Preferred Stock. Additionally, Nasdaq determined that the Series B Preferred Stock provides the holder the right to appoint a majority of the Company’s board of directors when such representation is not justified by the relative contribution of the Series B Preferred Stock pursuant to the Agreement.

Under the Voting Rights Rule, a company cannot create a new class of security that votes at a higher rate than an existing class of securities or take any other action that has the effect of restricting or reducing the voting rights of an existing class of securities. As such, according to the Letter, the issuance of the Preferred Stock violated the Voting Rights Rule because the holders of the Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on an as-converted basis, thus having greater voting rights than holders of common stock, and the Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to a disproportionate representation on the Company’s board of directors.

According to the Letter, the Company has 45 calendar days from the date of the Letter, or until August 7, 2023, to submit a plan to regain compliance (the “Compliance Plan”) with the Voting Rights Rule, and if such plan is accepted by Nasdaq, the Company can receive an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the date of the Letter to evidence compliance. However, if the Company’s plan is not accepted by Nasdaq, the Common Stock will be subject to delisting. The Company would have been highly concentratedthe right to appeal that decision to a hearings panel. The Letter also provides that the Company’s name will be included on a list of all non-compliant companies which Nasdaq makes available to investors on its website at listingcenter.nasdaq.com, beginning five business days from the date of the Letter. As part of this process, an indicator reflecting the Company’s non-compliance is broadcast over Nasdaq’s market data dissemination network and is also made available to third party market data providers.

The Company intends to submit the Compliance Plan to Nasdaq as promptly as practicable and update the public of any developments in this regard, as required by applicable securities laws and regulations as well as Nasdaq’s rules. The Company cannot provide any assurances with one or two major customers,respect to Nasdaq’s response to the forthcoming Compliance Plan.

If we were to fail to meet a Nasdaq listing requirement, we will be subject to delisting by the Nasdaq. In the event our common stock is no longer listed for trading on the Nasdaq, our trading volume and share price may decrease and we may experience further difficulties in raising capital which could materially affect our operations and financial results. Further, delisting from the Nasdaq could also have other negative effects, including potential loss of confidence by partners, lenders, suppliers and employees and could also trigger various defaults under our lending agreements and other outstanding agreements. Finally, delisting could make it harder for us to raise capital and sell securities. You may experience future dilution as a major customerresult of future equity offerings. In order to raise additional capital, we may in the future offer additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock at prices that may not be the same as the price per share in this offering.

The Series B and Series C preferred stock, if approved by shareholders for conversion, could result in significant dilution to shareholders.

A third party fairness opinion was utilized by the Company for the March 6, 2023 acquisition of BNC. In exchange for BNC, the Company issued AAI Series B and certain of its employees Series C convertible preferred stock which would be convertible into 11,516,667 and 1,816,667 shares of the Company’s common stock on a reverse split adjusted basis. The conversion of this preferred stock by AAI and its employees, however, is subject to both Nasdaq and shareholder approval rules requiring a majority vote of shareholders to approve a change of control for AAI to acquire more than 19.9% of the voting rights within the Company. Furthermore, the conversion of the Series B and Series C preferred stock is subject to the Company’s authorized and available shares which are currently at 3,333,333 and 1,949,501, respectively as of the date of this Annual Report. If the Company is able to successfully obtain shareholder approval to allow the conversion of the Series B and Series C preferred stock as well as increase its authorized shares, then this event would, assuming that AAI or its employees were to sell the shares of our common stock upon conversion of the preferred stock, result in significant dilution to the Company’s existing common shareholders.


We have a significant adverse effect onan evolving business model, which increases the complexity of our business.

As disclosedOur business model has evolved in our financial statements, salesthe past and continues to two major customers represent significant percentagesdo so. In prior years we have added additional types of total sales. Whileservices and product offerings and in some cases, we have modified or discontinued those offerings. We intend to continue to try to offer additional types of products or services, and we do not anticipate lossknow whether any of them will be successful. From time to time we have also modified aspects of our business model relating to our product mix. We do not know whether these or any major customer, such a loss couldother modifications will be successful. The additions and modifications to our business have a significantly negative impact onincreased the complexity of our business and cash flows.

If we are unableplaced significant strain on our management, personnel, operations, systems, technical performance, financial resources, and internal financial control and reporting functions. Future additions to develop and generate additional demand for our services or products, we will likely suffer serious harm to our business.

We have invested significant resources in developing and marketing our services and products. Somemodifications of our services and productsbusiness are often considered complex and often involve alikely to have similar effects. Further, any new approach tobusiness or website we launch that is not favorably received by the conductmarket could damage our reputation or our brand. The occurrence of business by our customers. As a result, intensive marketing and sales efforts may be necessary to educate prospective customers regardingany of the uses and benefits of our services and products in order to generate additional demand. The market for our services and products may weaken, competitors may develop superior offerings or we may fail to develop acceptable solutions to address new market conditions. Any one of these eventsforegoing could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Relating to Our Planned Spin-offs

There is an inherent risk that a regulatory agency may attempt to change the Company’s record date for its planned stock dividends.

The Company announced that its common and preferred shareholders of record as of September 30, 2022 would be entitled to receive a pro rata share of the common stock holdings of WTRV and Wolf Energy in the respective spin-off reverse merger transactions of White River Holdings and Banner Midstream. Additionally, the Company announced that its common and preferred shareholders of record as of November 15, 2022 would be entitled to receive their pro rata share of at least 95% of any net proceeds received from the ongoing Zest Labs litigation and their pro rata share of Zest Labs which the Company plans to transfer into Zest Holdings. While the Company intends to distribute these shares of common stock and any proceeds from Zest Holdings to shareholders of record as of the previously announced record dates, there is a substantial risk that a regulator, including but not limited to the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), may require the Company to change its record date to a future unknown date selected by the regulator. If a regulator were to direct a change in this record date it could cause a material liability for the Company due to potential lawsuits from both (i) common shareholders who sold their shares of common stock after the record date under the assumption that they would have been eligible to receive stock dividends as well as (ii) common and preferred shareholders who held their shares after the record dates but had their pro rata share of ownership in the company decreased due to subsequent dilution incurred on Company share issuances and capital raises after the record dates. In the event that a regulator attempted to change the Company’s record dates for these stock dividends, the Company would defend itself vigorously and potentially pursue legal measures against the regulator in an attempt to mitigate any potential shareholder lawsuits. However, the outcome of any such action cannot be predicted with any degree of certitude by the Company and there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to successfully defend itself.

We have incurred significant delays in the effectiveness of registration statements to enable the Company to issue stock dividends of WTRV and Wolf Energy.

The Form S-1 for the registration of the common stock underlying the White River Holdings stock dividend was filed on December 7, 2022, with the sixth amendment thereto having been filed on July 5, 2023. The Form S-1 for the registration of the common stock underlying the Banner Midstream stock dividend was filed on March 10, 2023. As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report, neither registration statement has been declared effective by the SEC. The Company may incur further delays on these registration statements and cannot accurately predict when either will be declared effective, if ever.

We may encounter issues with the ability to transfer either the intellectual property or litigation of Zest into Zest Holdings.

The Company intends to transfer all of the common stock of Zest Labs into Zest Holdings. Any net cash proceeds from the Zest Labs litigation or any sale or licensing of Zest Labs intellectual property would then be distributed to the Company’s shareholders of record on a pro rata basis as of November 15, 2022, DTC permitting. There is an inherent risk that the Company may determine that a potential risk relating to the future viability of either the Zest Labs litigation or the Zest Labs intellectual property exists and that could be triggered upon this transfer. If this event occurs, the Company would most likely leave Zest Labs as a wholly owned subsidiary but still intend to distribute any net cash proceeds realized by Zest Labs to shareholders of record on a pro rata basis as of November 15, 2022.


Risks Related to BNC

If BNC fails to retain existing users and add a very significant number of new users, or if BNC’s users decrease their level of engagement with BNC’s products, BNC’s revenue, financial results, and business may be significantly harmed.

If BNC fails to retain existing users and add a very significant number of new users, or if BNC’s users decrease their level of engagement with BNC’s products, BNC’s revenue, financial results, and business may be significantly harmed. The following events, among others, should they occur, would have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flowfinancial condition and future prospects:

users increasingly engage with other competitive products or services;

BNC fails to introduce new features, products, or services that users find engaging or if BNC introduces new products or services, or makes changes to existing products and services, that are not favorably received;

BNC fails to develop all of the products it intends to make available on its Platform, which could adversely impact the utility of our Platform and our user experience;

users feel that their experience is diminished as a result of the decisions BNC makes with respect to the frequency, prominence, format, size, and quality of ads that BNC displays;

users have difficulty installing, updating, or otherwise accessing BNC’s products on mobile or other devices as a result of actions by BNC or third parties that BNC relies on to distribute BNC’s products and deliver BNC’s services;

BNC is unable to develop products for mobile devices that users find engaging, that work with a variety of mobile operating systems and networks, and that achieve a high level of market acceptance;

there are decreases in user sentiment due to questions about the quality or usefulness of BNC’s products or BNC’s user data practices, concerns about the nature of content made available on BNC’s products, or concerns related to privacy, safety, security, well-being, or other factors;

BNC is unable to manage and prioritize information to ensure users are presented with content that is appropriate, interesting, useful, and relevant to them;

BNC is unable to obtain or attract engaging third-party content;

BNC is unable to successfully maintain or grow usage of and engagement with applications that integrate with BNC’s products;

users adopt new technologies where BNC’s products may be displaced in favor of other products or services, or may not be featured or otherwise available;

there are changes mandated by legislation, government and regulatory authorities, or litigation that adversely affect BNC’s products or users or increase BNC’s compliance costs;

BNC is unable to offer a number of BNC’s products and services in other countries, or are otherwise limited in BNC’s business operations, as a result of foreign regulators, courts, or legislative bodies determining that BNC’s reliance on Standard Contractual Clauses or other legal bases BNC may rely upon to transfer user data from the foreign country to the United States is invalid;

there is decreased engagement with BNC’s products, or failure to accept BNC’s terms of service, as part of privacy-focused changes that BNC has implemented or may implement in the future, whether voluntarily, in connection with the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), the European Union’s ePrivacy Directive, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), or other laws, regulations, or regulatory actions, or otherwise;


technical or other problems prevent BNC from delivering its products in a rapid and reliable manner or otherwise affect the user experience, such as security breaches or failure to prevent or limit spam or similar content, or users feel their experience is diminished as a result of BNC’s efforts to protect the security and integrity of the Platform;

BNC adopts terms, policies, or procedures related to areas such as sharing, content, user data, or advertising, or BNC takes, or fails to take, actions to enforce BNC’s policies, that are perceived negatively by BNC’s users or the general public;

BNC elects to focus its product decisions on longer-term initiatives that do not prioritize near-term user growth and engagement;

BNC makes changes in its user account login or registration processes or changes in how BNC promotes different products and services across its family of products;

initiatives designed to attract and retain users and engagement, including the use of new technologies such as artificial intelligence, are unsuccessful, whether as a result of actions by BNC, its competitors, or other third parties, or otherwise;

there is decreased engagement with BNC’s products as a result of taxes imposed on the use of social media or other mobile applications in certain countries, internet shutdowns, or other actions by governments that affect the accessibility of BNC’s products in their countries;

BNC fails to provide adequate customer service to users, marketers, developers, or other partners; or

BNC, developers whose products are integrated with BNC’s products, or other partners and companies in BNC’s industry are the subject of adverse media reports or other negative publicity, including as a result of BNC’s or its user data practices.

The size of BNC’s user base and BNC’s users’ level of engagement across BNC’s products are critical to BNC’s success. BNC’s financial performance will be significantly determined by BNC’s success in adding, retaining, and engaging active users of BNC’s products that deliver ad impressions. User growth and engagement are also impacted by a number of other factors, including competitive products and services, such as TikTok, that could reduce some users’ engagement with BNC’s products and services, as well as global and regional business, macroeconomic, and geopolitical conditions. Any future declines in the size of BNC’s active user base, which to date is minimal, may adversely impact BNC’s ability to deliver ad impressions and, in turn, BNC’s financial performance.

If people do not perceive BNC’s products to be useful, reliable, and trustworthy, BNC may not be able to attract or retain users or otherwise maintain or increase the frequency and duration of their engagement. A number of other social networking companies that achieved early popularity have since seen their active user bases or levels of engagement decline, in some cases precipitously. There is no guarantee that BNC will not experience a similar inability to generate a significant used baser or, if achieved, subsequent erosion of BNC’s active user base or engagement levels. User engagement can be difficult to measure, particularly as BNC introduces new and different products and services. Any number of factors can negatively affect user retention, growth, and engagement, including if:

 From time to time, certain of these factors have negatively affected user retention, growth, and engagement to varying degrees. If BNC are unable to maintain or increase BNC’s user base and user engagement, particularly for BNC’s significant revenue-generating products like Facebook and Instagram, BNC’s revenue and financial condition.results may be adversely affected. Any significant decrease in user retention, growth, or engagement could render BNC’s products less attractive to users, marketers, and developers, which is likely to have a material and adverse impact on BNC’s ability to deliver ad impressions and, accordingly, BNC’s revenue, business, financial condition, and results of operations. As the size of BNC’s active user base fluctuates in one or more markets from time to time, BNC will become increasingly dependent on BNC’s ability to maintain or increase levels of user engagement and monetization in order to grow revenue.

 

Undetected errors


BNC’s user growth, engagement, and monetization on mobile devices depend upon effective operation with mobile operating systems, networks, technologies, products, and standards that BNC does not control.

The substantial majority of BNC’s revenue is expected to be generated from advertising on mobile devices. There is no guarantee that popular mobile devices will feature BNC’s products, or failuresthat mobile device users will ever use BNC’s products rather than competing products. BNC is dependent on the interoperability of BNC’s products with popular mobile operating systems, networks, technologies, products, and standards that BNC does not control, such as the Android and iOS operating systems and mobile browsers. Changes, bugs, or technical issues in our softwaresuch systems, or changes in BNC’s relationships with mobile operating system partners, handset manufacturers, browser developers, or mobile carriers, or in the content or application of their terms of service or policies that degrade BNC’s products’ functionality, reduce or eliminate BNC’s ability to update or distribute BNC’s products, give preferential treatment to competitive products, limit BNC’s ability to deliver, target, or measure the effectiveness of ads, or charge fees related to the distribution of BNC’s products or BNC’s delivery of ads have in the past adversely affected, and could in the future adversely affect, the usage of BNC’s products and monetization on mobile devices.

BNC’s products and changes to such products could fail to attract or retain users or generate revenue and profits, or otherwise adversely affect BNC’s business.

BNC’s ability to retain, increase, and engage its user base and to increase BNC’s revenue depends heavily on BNC’s ability to continue to evolve BNC’s existing products and to create successful new products, both independently and in conjunction with developers or other third parties. BNC is currently in the early stages of development, has made a limited number of products available to users and has not developed all of the products it intends to release to users. Although BNC is actively developing products it intends to release to users, in the future, technological, competitive or financial pressures, among other changes, could cause BNC to abandon its product development plans which would adversely harm its user experience and financial results. In addition, BNC may introduce significant changes to BNC’s products or acquire or introduce new and unproven products, including using technologies with which BNC has little or no prior development or operating experience. For example, BNC does not have significant experience with consumer hardware products or virtual or augmented reality technology, which may adversely affect BNC’s ability to successfully develop and market these products and technologies. BNC will incur substantial costs, and BNC may not be successful in generating profits, in connection with these efforts. These efforts, including the introduction of new products or changes to existing products, may result in new or enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, litigation, ethical concerns, or other complications that could adversely affect BNC’s business, reputation, or financial results. If BNC’s new products or changes to existing products fail to engage users, marketers, or developers, or if BNC’s business plans are unsuccessful, BNC may fail to attract or retain users or to generate sufficient revenue, operating margin, or other value to justify BNC’s investments, and BNC’s business may be adversely affected.

BNC may be adversely impacted by negative economic conditions.

BNC’s performance and financial condition are subject to economic conditions and the impact such conditions have on levels of discretionary spending. Factors that may impact discretionary spending include inflation, employment rates, the liquidity of the capital markets, economic uncertainty and political conditions. Spending on BNC’s Platform has declined in the past, and could decline in the future, during recessionary periods and other periods of uncertainty or in which capital is constrained. If spending on BNC’s marketplace or Platform declines, or grows at a slower rate, including as a result of reduced discretionary consumer spending, BNC’s business, financial condition, and results of operations would be adversely affected.

BNC may not be successful in its metaverse strategy and investments, which could adversely affect BNC’s business, reputation, or financial results.

BNC believes that the metaverse, an embodied internet where people have immersive experiences beyond two-dimensional screens, is the next evolution in social technology. BNC intends to focus on helping to bring the metaverse to life. BNC expects this will be a complex, evolving, and long-term initiative that will involve the development of new and emerging technologies, require significant investment in infrastructure as well as privacy, safety, and security efforts, and collaboration with other companies, developers, partners, and other participants. However, the metaverse may not develop in accordance with BNC’s expectations, and market acceptance of features, products, or services could result in loss or delay inBNC may build for the metaverse is uncertain. While BNC intends to regularly evaluate BNC’s product roadmaps and make significant changes as BNC’s understanding of the technological challenges and market acceptance for our products or lost sales.

Because our software serviceslandscape and products,BNC’s product ideas and the environments in which they operate, are complex, our software and products may contain errorsdesigns evolve, there is no guarantee that canBNC will be detected at any point in its lifecycle. While we continually test our services and products for errors, errors may be found at any timeable to successfully compete in the future. DetectionIn addition, BNC has virtually no experience with consumer hardware products and virtual and augmented reality technology, which may enable other companies to compete more effectively than it can. BNC may be unsuccessful in BNC’s future research and product development efforts, including if BNC is unable to develop relationships with key participants in the metaverse or develop products that operate effectively with metaverse technologies, products, systems, networks, or standards. BNC hopes to make investments in virtual and augmented reality and other technologies to support these efforts, and BNC’s ability to support these efforts is dependent on generating sufficient profits from BNC’s business. In addition, as BNC’s metaverse efforts evolve, BNC may be subject to a variety of anyexisting or new laws and regulations in the United States and international jurisdictions, including in the areas of privacy, safety, competition, content regulation, consumer protection, and e-commerce, which may delay or impede the development of BNC’s products and services, increase BNC’s operating costs, require significant errorsmanagement time and attention, or otherwise harm BNC’s business. As a result of these or other factors, BNC’s metaverse strategy and investments may not be successful in the foreseeable future, or at all, which could adversely affect BNC’s business, reputation, or financial results.


BNC may not be able to successfully grow usage of and engagement with applications that integrate with BNC’s products.

BNC hopes to make investments to enable developers to build, grow, and monetize applications that integrate with BNC’s products. Such existing and prospective developers may not be successful in building, growing, or monetizing applications that create and maintain user engagement. Additionally, developers may choose to build on other platforms, including platforms controlled by third parties, rather than building products that integrate with BNC’s products. BNC is continuously seeking to balance the distribution objectives of BNC’s developers with BNC’s desire to provide an optimal user experience, and BNC may not be successful in achieving a balance that attracts or retains such developers. In addition, as part of BNC’s efforts related to privacy, safety, and security, BNC intends to conduct investigations and audits of platform applications from time to time. In some instances, these actions will adversely affect BNC’s relationships with developers. If BNC is not successful in BNC’s efforts to grow the number of developers that choose to build products that integrate with BNC’s products or if BNC is unable to continue to build and maintain good relations with such developers, BNC’s user growth and user engagement as well as its financial results may be adversely affected.

Some developers, creators, and users on our Platform may make unauthorized, fraudulent, or illegal use of Bitnile Tokens, Coins and other digital goods or experiences on our Platform, including through unauthorized third-party websites or “cheating” programs.

Bitnile Tokens, Coins, and digital goods on our Platform have no monetary value outside of our Platform, and cannot be traded between accounts currently within bitnile.com, but users may in the future make unauthorized, fraudulent, or illegal sales and/or purchases of BitNile Tokens, Coins, and other digital goods on or off of our Platform, including through unauthorized third-party websites in exchange for real-world currency. For example, when trading between characters is implemented, some users may make fraudulent use of credit cards owned by others on our Platform to purchase Bitnile Tokens or coins and offer the purchased tokens and coins for sale at a discount on a third-party website.

While we plan to regularly monitor and screen usage of our Platform with the aim of identifying and preventing these activities, and regularly monitor third-party websites for fraudulent Bitnile products or digital goods offers as well as regularly send cease-and-desist letters to operators of these third-party websites, we are unable to control or stop all unauthorized, fraudulent, or illegal transactions in Bitnile Tokens, Coins, or other digital goods that occurs on or off of our Platform. Although we are not directly responsible for such unauthorized, fraudulent, and/or illegal activities conducted by these third parties, our user experience may be adversely affected, and users and/or developers may choose to leave our Platform if these activities are pervasive. These activities may also result in negative publicity, disputes, or even legal claims, and measures we take in response may be expensive, time consuming, and disruptive to our operations.

In addition, unauthorized, fraudulent, and/or illegal purchases and/or sales of Bitnile Tokens, Coins, or other digital goods on or off of our Platform, including through third-party websites, bots, fake accounts, or “cheating” or malicious programs that enable users to exploit vulnerabilities in the experiences on our Platform or our partners’ websites and platforms, could reduce our revenue and bookings by, among other things, lossdecreasing revenue from authorized and legitimate transactions, increasing chargebacks from unauthorized credit card transactions, causing us to lose revenue and bookings from dissatisfied users who stop engaging with the experiences on our Platform, or increasing costs we incur to develop technological measures to curtail unauthorized transactions and other malicious programs.

Under the terms of service for our Platform, which developers, creators and users are obligated to comply with, we reserve the right to temporarily or delaypermanently ban individuals for breaching our Terms of Use by violating applicable law or bitnile.com policies which include engaging in market acceptanceillegal activity on the Platform. We will also employe technological measures to help detect unauthorized transactions and sales ofcontinue to develop additional methods and processes through which we can identify unauthorized transactions and block such transactions. However, there can be no assurance that our servicesefforts to prevent or minimize these unauthorized, fraudulent, or illegal transactions will be successful.

Due to unfamiliarity and products, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation, increased service and warranty costs, license terminations or renegotiations or costly litigation. Additionally, because our services and products support or rely on other systems and applications, any software or hardware errors or defectssome negative publicity associated with digital assets, BNC’s user base may lose confidence in these systems or applications may result in errors in the performance of our service or products, and it may be difficult or impossible to determine where the error resides.

We may not be competitive, and increased competition could seriously harm our business.

Relative to us, some of our current competitors or potential competitors of our products and services that utilize technology related to digital assets.

One of BNC’s products and experiences is a virtual market which facilitates the sales of digital assets from BNC as well as third party vendors like virtual real estate, digital art, user customizations and unique collectibles. Products and services that are based on digital assets are relatively new. The digital asset industry has companies that are unlicensed, unregulated, operate without supervision by any governmental authorities. As a result, users and the general public may lose confidence in digital assets, including BNC products and services. Companies like BNC that deal in digital assets are appealing targets for hackers and malware and may also be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement actions. Negative perception, a lack of stability and standardized regulation in the digital asset industry and the failure of digital asset focused companies due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government mandated regulation, may reduce confidence in BNC’s business. Any of these events could have one or more of the following advantages:a material and adverse impact on BNC’s business.


 

longer operating histories;
greater financial, technical, marketing, sales and other resources;
positive cash flows from operations;
greater name recognition;
a broader range of products to offer;
an established intellectual property portfolio;
a larger installed base of customers;
superior customer service;
higher levels of quality and reliability;
dependable and efficient distribution networks; and
competitive product and services pricing.

Risks Related to BNC’s Business Operations and Financial Results

Our business is highly competitive. Competition presents an ongoing threat to the success of BNC’s business.

BNC expects to compete with companies providing connection, sharing, discovery, and communication products and services to users online, as well as companies that sell advertising to businesses looking to reach consumers and/or develop tools and systems for managing and optimizing advertising campaigns. BNC faces significant competition in every aspect of BNC’s business, including, but not limited to, companies that facilitate the ability of users to create, share, communicate, and discover content and information online or enable marketers to reach their existing or prospective audiences. BNC expects to compete to attract, engage, and retain people who use BNC’s products, to attract and retain businesses that use BNC’s free or paid business and advertising services, and to attract and retain developers who build compelling applications that integrate with BNC’s products. BNC also expects to compete with companies that develop and deliver virtual and augmented reality products and services. As BNC introduces or acquires new products, or as other companies introduce new products and services, including as part of efforts to develop the metaverse or innovate through the application of new technologies such as artificial intelligence, BNC may become subject to additional competition.

 

Although no single competitive factor is dominant,Virtually all BNC’s current and potential competitors have greater resources, experience, or stronger competitive positions in the product segments, geographic regions, or user demographics in which BNC intends to operate than BNC does. For example, some of BNC’s competitors may be domiciled in different countries and subject to political, legal, and regulatory regimes that enable them to compete more effectively than BNC could. These factors may allow BNC’s competitors to respond more effectively than BNC to new or emerging technologies and changes in market conditions. In the event that users engage with other products and services, BNC may never see any growth in use and engagement in key user demographics or more broadly, in which case BNC’s business would be harmed.

BNC’s competitors may develop products, features, or services that are similar to its own or that achieve greater acceptance, may undertake more far-reaching and successful product development efforts or marketing campaigns, or may adopt more aggressive pricing policies. Some competitors may gain a competitive advantage against BNC, including: by making acquisitions; by limiting BNC’s ability to deliver, target, or measure the effectiveness of ads; by imposing fees or other charges related to BNC’s delivery of ads; by making access to BNC’s products more difficult or impossible; by making it more difficult to communicate with BNC’s users; or by integrating competing platforms, applications, or features into products they control such as mobile device operating systems, search engines, browsers, or e-commerce platforms. BNC’s competitors may, and in some cases will, acquire and engage users or generate advertising or other revenue at the expense of BNC’s own efforts, which would negatively affect BNC’s business and financial results. In addition, from time to time, BNC may take actions in response to competitive threats, but BNC cannot assure you that these actions will be successful or that they will not negatively affect BNC’s business and financial results.

Real or perceived inaccuracies in BNC’s community and other metrics may harm BNC’s reputation and negatively affect BNC’s business.

The numbers for BNC’s key metrics are calculated using internal company data based on the activity of user accounts, at times augmented by other sources. While these numbers are based on what BNC believes to be reasonable estimates of BNC’s user base for the applicable period of measurement, there are inherent challenges in measuring usage of BNC’s products across online and mobile populations around the world. The methodologies used to measure these metrics require significant judgment and are also susceptible to algorithm or other technical errors. In addition, BNC is seeking to establish cooperative relationships among themselvesmechanisms to improve its estimates of its user base, and such estimates may change due to improvements or changes in BNC’s methodology. BNC intends to regularly review BNC’s processes for calculating these metrics, and from time to time BNC expects to discover inaccuracies in these metrics or make adjustments to improve their accuracy.

The lack of comprehensive encryption for communications on the Platform may increase the impact of a data security incident.

Communications on the Platform are not comprehensively encrypted at this time. As such, any data security incident that involves unauthorized access, acquisition, disclosure, or use may be highly impactful to BNC’s business. BNC may experience considerable incident response forensics, data recovery, legal fees, and costs of notification related to any such potential incident, and BNC may face an increased risk of reputational harm, regulatory enforcement, and consumer litigation, which could further harm BNC’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and future business opportunities.

BNC relies on the experience and expertise of its senior management team and skilled employees with creative and technical backgrounds.

BNC’s success depends in part upon the continued service of its senior management team and key technical employees. Each of these employees could terminate his or her relationship with BNC at any time. Such employees, particularly game designers, engineers and project managers with desirable skill sets are in high demand, and BNC devotes significant resources to identifying, hiring, training, successfully integrating and retaining these employees. Hiring and retaining skilled employees to support BNC’s products and services is highly competitive. A lack of skilled technical workers or the loss of any member of BNC’s senior management team could delay or negatively impact BNC’s business plans, ability to compete, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.


Risks Related to Government Regulation and Enforcement

Actions by governments that restrict access to BNC’s products in their countries, censor or moderate content on BNC’s products in their countries, or otherwise impair BNC’s ability to sell advertising in their countries, could substantially harm BNC’s business and financial results.

BNC expects that governments will from time to time seek to censor or moderate content available on BNC’s products, should such products ever be developed, distributed and used by customers, in their country, restrict access to BNC’s products from their country partially or entirely, or impose other restrictions that may affect the accessibility of BNC’s products in their country for an extended period of time or indefinitely. In addition, government authorities may seek to restrict user access to BNC’s products if they consider us to be in violation of their laws or a threat to public safety or for other reasons. It is also possible that government authorities could take action that impairs BNC’s ability to sell advertising, including in countries where access to BNC’s consumer-facing products may be blocked or restricted. In the event that content shown on BNC’s products is subject to censorship, access to BNC’s products is restricted, in whole or in part, in one or more countries, BNC would be required to or could elect to make changes to BNC’s future operations, or other restrictions are imposed on BNC’s products, or BNC’s competitors are able to successfully penetrate new geographic markets or capture a greater share of existing geographic markets that BNC cannot access or where BNC face other restrictions, BNC’s ability to increase BNC’s user base, user engagement, or the level of advertising by marketers may be adversely affected, and BNC may not be able to grow BNC’s revenue as anticipated, and BNC’s financial results could be adversely affected.

BNC’s business is subject to complex existing U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data use and data protection, content, competition, safety and consumer protection, e-commerce, and other matters, many of which may be amended supplements by laws and regulations in the future. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation and applicability to BNC, and could result in claims, changes to BNC’s products and business practices, monetary penalties, increased cost of operations, or declines in user growth or engagement, or otherwise harm BNC’s business.

BNC is subject to a variety of laws and regulations, changes in existing laws and regulations or the interpretations of them in the United States and abroad that will involve matters central to BNC’s business, including, but not limited to, privacy, data use, data protection and personal information, biometrics, encryption, rights of publicity, content, integrity, intellectual property, advertising, marketing, distribution, data security, data retention and deletion, data localization and storage, data disclosure, artificial intelligence and machine learning, electronic contracts and other communications, competition, protection of minors, consumer protection, civil rights, accessibility, telecommunications, product liability, e-commerce, digital assets, gaming, gambling, sweepstakes, promotions, taxation, economic or other trade controls including sanctions, anti-corruption and political law compliance, securities law compliance, and online payment services. The introduction of new products, expansion of BNC’s activities in certain jurisdictions, or other actions that BNC may take may subject it to additional laws, regulations, or other government scrutiny. In addition, foreign data protection, privacy, content, competition, consumer protection, and other laws and regulations can impose different obligations or be more restrictive than those in the United States.

BNC may incur substantial expenses to comply with laws and regulations or defend against a claim that BNC has not complied with them. Further, any failure on BNC’s part to comply with any relevant laws or regulations may subject BNC to significant civil or criminal liabilities, penalties, taxes, fees, costs and negative publicity. The application of existing domestic and international laws and regulations to BNC relating to issues such as user privacy and data protection, security, defamation, pricing, advertising, taxation, digital assets, gambling, sweepstakes, promotions, consumer protection, accessibility, content regulation, quality of services, law enforcement demands, telecommunications, mobile, and intellectual property ownership and infringement in many instances is unclear or unsettled. Further, the application to us of existing laws regulating or requiring licenses for certain businesses of BNC advertisers can be unclear. For example, BNC operates a social casino with a sweepstakes component, through which it offers real money prizes. It is unclear whether certain regulations relating to gaming, gambling, and sweepstakes apply to our operations. U.S. export control laws and regulations also impose requirements and restrictions on exports to certain nations and persons and on BNC’s business. Internationally, BNC may also be subject to laws regulating BNC’s activities in foreign countries and to foreign laws and regulations that are inconsistent from country to country.

These U.S. federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations, which in some cases can be enforced by private parties in addition to government entities, are constantly evolving and can be subject to significant change. As a result, the application, interpretation, and enforcement of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which BNC operates, and may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and inconsistently with BNC’s current policies and practices. For example, regulatory or legislative actions or litigation affecting the manner in which BNC displays content to BNC’s users, moderate content, or obtain consent to various practices could adversely affect user growth and engagement. Such actions could affect the manner in which BNC provides its services or adversely affect BNC’s financial results.


As its business develops, BNC expects to become subject to significant legislative and regulatory developments, and proposed or new legislation and regulations could significantly affect BNC’s business in the future. For example, BNC intends to implement certain product changes and controls as a result of requirements under the European General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), and may implement additional changes in the future. The interpretation of the GDPR is still evolving and draft decisions in investigations are subject to review by several European privacy regulators as part of the GDPR’s consistency mechanism, which may lead to significant changes in the final outcome of such investigations. As a result, the interpretation and enforcement of the GDPR, as well as the imposition and amount of penalties for non-compliance, are subject to significant uncertainty. The California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), also establishes certain transparency rules and creates new data privacy rights for users, including limitations on BNC’s use of certain sensitive personal information and more ability for users to control the purposes for which their data is shared with third partiesparties. Other states have proposed or enacted similar comprehensive privacy laws that afford users with similar data privacy rights and controls. These laws and regulations are evolving and subject to enhance their offeringsinterpretation, and resulting limitations on BNC’s advertising services, or reductions of advertising by marketers, could adversely affect BNC’s advertising business.

These laws and regulations, as well as any associated claims, inquiries, or investigations or any other government actions, have in the past led to, and may in the future lead to, unfavorable outcomes including increased compliance costs, loss of revenue, delays or impediments in the development of new products, negative publicity and reputational harm, increased operating costs, diversion of management time and attention, and remedies that are competitive withharm BNC’s business, including fines or demands or orders that BNC modify or cease existing business practices.

Changes in laws affecting gaming, and sweepstakes, or the public perception of gaming, and sweepstakes may adversely impact our or BNC’s business.

BNC offers a number of products and services, which may include a selection of gaming options, including sweepstakes, and social gaming experiences. Social gaming experiences have recently been the subject of civil lawsuits, and some jurisdictions have taken an adverse position to interactive social gaming, including “social casinos” and sweepstakes-based gaming. This could lead to states adopting legislation or imposing a regulatory framework to govern interactive social gaming or social casino or sweepstakes-based gaming specifically. These could also result in a prohibition on interactive social gaming or social casino or sweepstakes-based gaming altogether, restrict BNC’s ability to advertise its games, or substantially increase BNC or our costs to comply with these regulations, all of which could have an adverse effect on our or BNC’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. It is not possible to predict the likelihood, timing, scope, or terms of any such legislation or regulation or the extent to which they may affect our or BNC’s business.

Regulators in the future may pass additional rules and regulations that could adversely affect our or BNC’s business. In May 2019, the World Health Organization adopted a new edition of its International Classification of Diseases, which lists gaming addiction as a disorder. The American Psychiatric Association (“APA”) and U.S. regulators have yet to decide whether gaming addiction should be considered a behavioral disorder, but the APA has noted that research and the debate on its classification are ongoing. Certain countries, including China and South Korea, have enacted regulations, such as imposing both gaming curfews and spending limits for minors, and established treatment programs aimed at addressing gaming addiction. It is not possible to predict the likelihood, timing, scope, or terms of any similar regulations in any of the markets in which BNC operates, or the extent to which implementation of such regulations may adversely affect our or BNC’s reputation and business.

Consumer protection and health concerns regarding games and gambling such as BNC’s have been raised in the past and may again be raised in the future. Such concerns could lead to increased scrutiny over the manner in which BNC’s games are designed, developed, distributed, and presented. We and BNC cannot predict the likelihood, timing or scope of any concern reaching a level that will impact its business, or whether it would suffer any adverse impacts to our or BNC’s results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Our reputation may be harmed due to unfamiliarity or negative press associated with activities BNC is undertaking, including the online metaverse landscape, virtual markets, real world goods marketplaces, gaming, social activities, sweepstakes, and digital assets.

BNC is focused on the development of the online metaverse landscape and is focused on immersive digital experiences, including virtual markets, real world goods marketplaces, gaming, social activities, sweepstakes, and more. The activities BNC is undertaking are based on technology that is relatively new. Many companies operating in similar industries are unlicensed, unregulated and/or operate without supervision by any governmental authorities. As a result, users and the general public may lose confidence in BNC’s products and services. Companies like BNC that deal in digital assets are appealing targets for hackers and malware and may also be more likely to be targets of regulatory enforcement actions. Negative perception, a lack of stability and standardized regulation in the industries in which BNC operates and the failure of similar companies due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government mandated regulation, may reduce confidence in our or BNC’s business. Any of these events could have a material and adverse impact on our or BNC’s reputation and business.


If BNC fails to protect users or is perceived to be failing to protect users, its business will suffer and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Unfavorable publicity regarding, for example, BNC’s privacy, data security, or data protection practices, terms of service, product changes, product quality, litigation or regulatory activity, the actions of BNC users or developers, the use of the Platform for illicit or objectionable ends (including the use of the Platform to possibly entice children to interact off-Platform), actual or perceived incidents or misuses of user data or other privacy or security incidents, the substance or enforcement of community standards, the quality, integrity, characterization and age-appropriateness of content shared on the Platform, or the actions of other companies that provide similar services to ours, has in the past, and could in the future, adversely affect BNC’s reputation. Although illicit activities are in violation of BNC’s terms and policies and BNC attempts to block objectionable material, BNC is unable to prevent all such violations from occurring and measures intended to make the Platform more attractive to older age-verified users may create the perception that the Platform is not safe for users. In addition, BNC maya faced allegations that its Platform has been used by criminal offenders to identify and communicate with children and to possibly entice them to interact off-Platform, outside of the restrictions of the chat, content blockers and other on-platform safety measures. While BNC devotes considerable resources to prevent this from occurring, any negative publicity could create the perception that BNC does not provide a safe online environment and may have an adverse effect on the size, engagement, and loyalty of its developer and user community, which would adversely affect business and financial results.

We may be subject to regulatory and other government investigations, enforcement actions, settlements, and other inquiries in the future, which could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us or BNC to change its business practices in a manner materially adverse to its business.

Should BNC’s business ever expand to a significant degree, we and BNC’s management expects to receive formal and informal inquiries from government authorities and regulators regarding BNC’s compliance with laws and regulations, many of which are evolving and subject to interpretation. In such a scenario, we and BNC expect to be the subject of investigations, inquiries, data requests, requests for information, actions, and audits in the United States, particularly in the areas of privacy and data protection, including with respect to minors, law enforcement, consumer protection, civil rights, content moderation, blockchain technologies, sweepstakes, promotions, gaming, gambling, and competition. In addition, we or BNC may in the future be subject to regulatory orders or consent decrees. 

We or BNC may also become subject to various litigation and formal and informal inquiries and investigations by competition authorities in the United States, which may relate to many aspects of BNC’s future business, including with respect to users and advertisers, as well as BNC’s industry. Such inquiries, investigations, and lawsuits concern, among other things, BNC’s business practices in the areas of social networking or social media services, digital advertising, gambling, and sweepstakes activities and/or mobile or online applications.

Orders issued by, or inquiries or enforcement actions initiated by, government or regulatory authorities could cause us or BNC to incur substantial costs, expose us to civil and criminal liability (including liability for personnel) or penalties (including substantial monetary remedies), interrupt or require us or BNC to change its business practices in a manner materially adverse to our or BNC’s business (including changes products or user data practices), result in negative publicity and reputational harm, divert resources and the time and attention of management from our or BNC’s business, or subject us or BNC to other structural or behavioral remedies that adversely affect our or BNC’s business.

BNC expects, should its business ever develop, to be subject to regulatory and other government investigations, enforcement actions, settlements and other inquiries in the future, which could cause us BNC incur substantial costs or require BNC to change its business practices in a manner materially adverse to its business.

Should BNC’s business ever expand and to a significant degree, its management expects it to receive formal and informal inquiries from government authorities and regulators regarding BNC’s compliance with laws and regulations, many of which are evolving and subject to interpretation. In such a scenario, BNC expects to be the subject of investigations, inquiries, data requests, requests for information, actions, and audits in the United States, Europe, and around the world, particularly in the areas of privacy and data protection, including with respect to minors, law enforcement, consumer protection, civil rights, content moderation, and competition. In addition, BNC may in the future be subject to regulatory orders or consent decrees.

BNC may also become subject to various litigation and formal and informal inquiries and investigations by competition authorities in the United States, Europe, and other jurisdictions, which may relate to many aspects of BNC’s future business, including with respect to users and advertisers, as well as BNC’s industry. Such inquiries, investigations, and lawsuits concern, among other things, BNC’s business practices in the areas of social networking or social media services, digital advertising, and/or mobile or online applications.

Orders issued by, or inquiries or enforcement actions initiated by, government or regulatory authorities could cause BNC to incur substantial costs, expose us to civil and criminal liability (including liability for BNC’s personnel) or penalties (including substantial monetary remedies), interrupt or require BNC to change its business practices in a manner materially adverse to BNC’s business (including changes to BNC’s products or user data practices), result in negative publicity and reputational harm, divert resources and the time and attention of management from BNC’s business, or subject it to other structural or behavioral remedies that adversely affect BNC’s business.


Payment transactions may subject us to additional regulatory requirements and other risks that could be costly and difficult to comply with or that could harm BNC’s business.

Several of BNC’s future products may offer payments functionality, including enabling BNC’s users to purchase tangible, virtual, and digital goods from merchants and developers that offer applications using BNC’s payment infrastructure, send money to other users, and make donations to certain charitable organizations, among other activities. BNC is or may become subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States, Europe and elsewhere, including those governing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing, money transmission, stored value, gift cards and other prepaid access instruments, electronic funds transfer, virtual currency, consumer protection, charitable fundraising, trade sanctions, and import and export restrictions. Depending on how BNC’s payment products evolve, BNC may also be subject to other laws and regulations including those governing gambling, sweepstakes, banking, and lending. In some jurisdictions, the application or interpretation of these laws and regulations is not clear. BNC’s efforts to comply with these laws and regulations could be costly and result in diversion of management time and effort and may still not guarantee compliance. In the event that BNC is found to be in violation of any such legal or regulatory requirements, BNC may be subject to monetary fines or other penalties such as a cease and desist order, or BNC may be required to make product changes, any of which could have an adverse effect on BNC’s business and financial results. 

Risks Related to Data, Security, and Intellectual Property

Security breaches, improper access to or disclosure of BNC’s data or user data, other hacking and phishing attacks on BNC’s systems, or other cyber incidents could harm BNC’s reputation and adversely affect BNC’s business.

BNC’s industry is prone to cyber-attacks by third parties seeking unauthorized access to BNC’s data or users’ data or to disrupt BNC’s ability to provide service. BNC’s products and services involve the collection, storage, processing, and transmission of a large amount of data. Any failure to prevent or mitigate security breaches and improper access to or disclosure of BNC’s data or user data, including personal information, content, or payment information from users, or information from marketers, could result in the loss, modification, disclosure, destruction, or other misuse of such data, which could harm BNC’s business and reputation and diminish BNC’s competitive position. In addition, computer malware, viruses, social engineering (such as spear phishing attacks), scraping, and general hacking continue to be prevalent in BNC’s industry and are expected to occur on BNC’s systems in the future. BNC expects to regularly encounter attempts to create false or undesirable user accounts, purchase ads, or take other actions on BNC’s platform for purposes such as spamming, spreading misinformation, or other objectionable ends. Such attacks may cause interruptions to the services BNC intends to provide, degrade the user experience, cause users or marketers to lose confidence and trust in BNC’s products, impair BNC’s internal systems, or result in financial harm to BNC. BNC’s efforts to protect its data or the information BNC receives, and to disable undesirable activities on BNC’s platform, may also be unsuccessful due to software bugs or other technical malfunctions; employee, contractor, or vendor error or malfeasance, including defects or vulnerabilities in BNC’s vendors’ information technology systems or offerings; government surveillance; breaches of physical security of BNC’s facilities or technical infrastructure; or other threats that evolve. In addition, third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or users to disclose information in order to gain access to BNC’s data or BNC’s users’ data. Cyber-attacks continue to evolve in sophistication and volume, and inherently may be difficult to detect for long periods of time. Although BNC intends to try to develop systems and processes that are designed to protect BNC’s data and user data, to prevent data loss, to disable undesirable accounts and activities on BNC’s platform, and to prevent or detect security breaches, BNC cannot assure you that such measures, if implemented, will provide adequate security, that BNC will be able to react in a timely manner, or that BNC’s remediation efforts will be successful. The changes in BNC’s work environment as a result of certain personnel working remotely could also impact the security of BNC’s systems, as well as BNC’s ability to protect against attacks and detect and respond to them quickly.

In addition, some of BNC’s developers or other partners, such as those that help us measure the effectiveness of ads, may receive or store information provided by us or by BNC’s users through mobile or web applications integrated with BNC’s products. If these third parties or developers fail to adopt or adhere to adequate data security practices, or in the event of a breach of their networks, BNC’s data or BNC’s users’ data may be improperly accessed, used, or disclosed.

BNC expects to experience cyber-attacks and other security incidents of varying degrees from time to time, and BNC expects to incur significant costs in protecting against or remediating such incidents. In addition, BNC is subject to a variety of laws and regulations in the United States and abroad relating to cybersecurity and data protection. As a result, affected users or government authorities could initiate legal or regulatory actions against BNC in connection with any actual or perceived security breaches or improper access to or disclosure of data, which has occurred in the past and which could cause BNC to incur significant expense and liability or result in orders or consent decrees forcing BNC to modify its business practices. Such incidents or BNC’s efforts to remediate such incidents may also result in a decline in BNC’s active user base or engagement levels. Any of these events could have a material and adverse effect on BNC’s business, reputation, or financial results.


We anticipate that BNC’s efforts related to privacy, safety, security, and content review will identify additional instances of misuse of user data or other undesirable activity by third parties on BNC’s platform.

BNC intends to make investments in privacy, safety, security, and content review efforts to combat misuse of BNC’s services and user data by third parties, including investigations and audits of platform applications, as well as other enforcement efforts. As a result of these efforts, BNC anticipates that BNC will discover and announce additional incidents of misuse of user data or other undesirable activity by third parties. BNC may not discover all such incidents or activity, whether as a result of BNC’s data or technical limitations, including BNC’s lack of visibility over BNC’s encrypted services, the allocation of resources to other projects, or other factors, and BNC may be notified of such incidents or activity by the FTC, the media or other third parties. Such incidents and activities may in the future include the use of user data or BNC’s systems in a manner inconsistent with BNC’s terms, contracts or policies, the existence of false or undesirable user accounts, improper advertising practices, activities that threaten people’s safety on or offline, or instances of spamming, scraping, data harvesting, unsecured datasets, or spreading misinformation. BNC may also be unsuccessful in its efforts to enforce BNC’s policies or otherwise remediate any such incidents. Consequences of any of the foregoing developments include negative effects on user trust and engagement, harm to BNC’s reputation, changes to BNC’s business practices in a manner adverse to BNC’s business, and adverse effects on BNC’s business and financial results. Any such developments may also subject BNC to additional litigation and regulatory inquiries, which could subject BNC to monetary penalties and damages, divert management’s time and attention, and lead to enhanced regulatory oversight. 

BNC’s products and internal systems rely on software and hardware that is highly technical, and any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities in these systems, or failures to address or mitigate technical limitations in BNC’s systems, could adversely affect BNC’s business. The Platform and the technology of the third-party service providers upon which BNC relies are also subject to the risks of severe weather, earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes and other natural catastrophic events and to interruption by man-made problems such as terrorism or cyberattacks.

It is critical the success of the Platform that users be able to access BNC’s website, mobile apps and Platform at all times. BNC’s systems, or those of third parties upon which BNC relies, may experience service interruptions, degradation, outages, and other performance problems that interrupt the availability or affect the speed or functionality of BNC’s website, mobile apps and Platform due to a variety of factors, including severe weather, earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, other natural disasters, power losses, disruptions in telecommunications services, fraud, military or political conflicts, terrorist attacks, hardware and software defects or malfunctions, cyberattacks and other similar incidents. BNC’s products and internal systems rely on software and hardware, including software and hardware developed or maintained internally and/or by third parties, that is highly technical and complex. In addition, BNC’s products and internal systems depend on the ability of such software and hardware to store, retrieve, process, and manage considerable amounts of data. The software and hardware on which BNC relies is expected to contain, errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities, and BNC’s systems are subject to certain technical limitations that may compromise BNC’s ability to meet BNC’s objectives. Some errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities inherently may be difficult to detect and may only be discovered after the code has been released for external or internal use. Errors, bugs, vulnerabilities, design defects, or technical limitations within the software and hardware on which BNC relies, or human error in using such systems, may in the future lead to outcomes including a negative experience for users and marketers who use BNC’s products, compromised ability of BNC’s products to perform in a manner consistent with BNC’s terms, contracts, or policies, delayed product introductions or enhancements, targeting, measurement, or billing errors, compromised ability to protect the data of BNC’s users and/or BNC’s intellectual property or other data, or reductions in BNC’s ability to provide some or all of BNC’s services. In addition, any errors, bugs, vulnerabilities, or defects in BNC’s systems or the software and hardware on which BNC relies, failures to properly address or mitigate the technical limitations in BNC’s systems, or associated degradations or interruptions of service or failures to fulfill BNC’s commitments to BNC’s users, are expected to lead to outcomes including damage to BNC’s reputation, loss of users, loss of marketers, prevention of its ability to generate revenue, regulatory inquiries, litigation, or liability for fines, damages, or other remedies, any of which could adversely affect BNC’s business and financial results.

If BNC is unable to protect BNC’s intellectual property, the value of its brands and other intangible assets may be diminished, and its business may be adversely affected.

BNC relies, and expects to continue to rely on a combination of confidentiality, assignment, and license agreements with BNC’s employees, consultants, and third parties with whom BNC has relationships, as well as intellectual property laws, to protect BNC’s proprietary rights. In the United States and internationally, BNC expects to file various applications for protection of certain aspects of BNC’s intellectual property. Third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe BNC’s proprietary rights, third parties may challenge proprietary rights held by BNC in the future, and future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which BNC operates or intends to operate. In any or all of these cases, BNC may be required to expend significant time and expense in order to prevent infringement or to enforce BNC’s rights. Although BNC expects to take measures to protect BNC’s proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that others will not offer products or concepts that are substantially similar to BNC’s and compete with BNC’s business. If the protection of BNC’s proprietary rights is inadequate to prevent unauthorized use or appropriation by third parties, the value of BNC’s brands and other intangible assets may be diminished and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic BNC’s products, services and methods of operations. Any of these events could have an adverse effect on BNC’s business and financial results.


BNC expects to be party to patent lawsuits and other intellectual property rights claims that are expensive and time consuming and, if resolved adversely, could have a significant impact on BNC’s business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Companies, in particular established ones, in the internet, technology, and media industries typically own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, or other violations of intellectual property or other rights. In the event that BNC ever develops a significant intellectual property portfolio, it would face similar challenges that established companies do. In addition, various “non-practicing entities” that own patents and other intellectual property rights often attempt to aggressively assert their rights in order to extract value from technology companies. Furthermore, from time to time BNC may introduce or acquire new products, which could increase BNC’s exposure to patent and other intellectual property claims from competitors and non-practicing entities.

From time to time, BNC may receive notices from patent holders and other parties alleging that certain of BNC’s products and services, or user content, infringe their intellectual property rights. BNC expects, should its business ever develop, to be involved in a number of intellectual property lawsuits. Defending patent and other intellectual property litigation is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees, and there can be no assurances that favorable final outcomes will be obtained in all or even most cases. In addition, plaintiffs may seek, and BNC may become subject to, preliminary or provisional rulings in the course of any such litigation, including potential preliminary injunctions requiring us to cease some or all of BNC’s anticipated operations. BNC may seek, if possible, to settle such lawsuits and disputes on terms that are unfavorable to it. Similarly, if any litigation to which BNC is a party is resolved adversely, BNC may be subject to an unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal, if appealed. The terms of such a settlement or judgment may require us to cease some or all of BNC’s operations or require us pay substantial amounts to the other party, which BNC may not be able to afford. In addition, BNC may have to seek a license to continue practices found to be in violation of a third party’s rights, which may not be available on reasonable terms, or at all, and may significantly increase BNC’s operating costs and expenses. As a result, BNC may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology or practices or discontinue the practices. The development of alternative non-infringing technology or practices could require significant effort and expense, could result in less effective technology or practices or otherwise negatively affect the user experience, or may not be feasible. BNC’s business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected as a result of an unfavorable resolution of the disputes and litigation referred to above.

We rely on the ability to use the intellectual property rights of third parties, and we may lose the benefit of any intellectual property owned by or licensed to BNC.

Substantially all of our games rely on products, technologies and other intellectual property that are licensed from third parties. The future success of our business will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain, retain or expand licenses for technologies and services in a competitive market. We cannot assure that these third-party licenses, or support for such licensed technologies and services, will continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In the event that we lose the benefit of, or cannot renew and/or expand existing licenses, we may be required to discontinue or limit our use of the technologies and services that include or incorporate the licensed intellectual property. In addition, we may not have the leverage to negotiate amendments to the Statement of Work, if required, on terms as favorable to us as those we would negotiate with an unaffiliated third party.

BNC may suffer from the use of a third-party platform for its primary development of the Platform.

BNC’s strategic decision to utilize a third-party platform for the primary development of the bitnile.com metaverse presents a variety of risks. The following events, should they occur, would have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and future prospects:

Technological Dependencies: Employing a third-party platform for BNC’s operations creates significant technological dependencies, introducing a new set of potential risks. This dependence means that BNC’s operations on bitnile.com are tied to the stability, security, and strategic direction of the third-party provider’s platform. A primary concern is the risk of technical difficulties. In the event that the third-party platform experiences system failures, software bugs, or performance issues, BNC may encounter disruptions in its operations. This could include slowdowns, service interruptions, or even complete outages, affecting user experience and potentially leading to a loss of users, decreased activity, and subsequently, reduced revenues. Security is another critical area of concern. If the third-party platform suffers from security breaches, BNC could face the risk of data exposure. This could involve unauthorized access to user data or corporate information, leading to privacy infringements, potential violation of data protection laws, and damage to BNC’s reputation. The fallout from such a breach could extend to legal repercussions and loss of trust among users and shareholders. Further, any unexpected shift in the third-party provider’s product strategy could also pose a threat. If the provider decides to discontinue certain features, change its technology stack, or modify the platform in a way that is not compatible with BNC’s operations, it could leave BNC looking for new solutions. This could necessitate significant unplanned investment in modifications, alternative solutions, or even migration to a new platform, with associated costs and potential service disruptions.

Business Continuity: Utilizing a third-party platform as a cornerstone of operations introduces an element of risk concerning business continuity for BNC. The provider’s operations, which are outside BNC’s direct control, could be subject to various disruptions. This includes potential financial instability, service alterations, technological failures, or even company-wide shutdowns. Such interruptions can have a significant cascading effect on BNC’s operations, threatening the regular functioning of bitnile.com. In severe cases, this could lead to a prolonged suspension of services, leaving BNC unable to meet its commitments to customers, partners, or other stakeholders. The fallout can be manifold, ranging from revenue loss and diminished customer trust to reputational damage in the marketplace.

Competitive Landscape: Utilizing a third-party platform could inadvertently contribute to intensifying competitive pressures. Given that similar tools and services are available to other market players, BNC may find its competitive edge being eroded. Furthermore, if the third-party platform decides to venture into the metaverse market, BNC could be confronted with competition from its own service provider. Additionally, the choice of platform can indirectly influence BNC’s market position. If the platform falls out of favor in the industry or is overtaken by newer, more innovative solutions, BNC’s association with it could negatively impact its perceived market standing.


Intellectual Property: Employing third-party technology presents substantial intellectual property (“IP”) concerns. When the third-party provider retains the majority of the IP rights, it poses a significant risk for BNC. In such a situation, BNC’s operational framework may hinge on technology for which it does not hold ownership, potentially limiting the company’s flexibility to modify or adapt the technology to suit its evolving needs. The use of third-party technology brings with it the risk of potential intellectual property infringement claims. If the third-party platform unlawfully incorporates other companies’ technologies, BNC could find itself ensnared in legal disputes.

Regulatory Compliance: Utilizing a third-party platform can present complex challenges. While employing external technology can yield substantial operational advantages, it concurrently exposes BNC to potential compliance risks. These can surface if the third-party platform does not adhere strictly to all pertinent regulations, including but not limited to privacy laws, data protection statutes, and industry-specific standards. Non-compliance may trigger a broad range of legal consequences, from fines and penalties to enforcement actions by regulatory bodies. Additionally, compliance failure can inflict significant damage on BNC’s reputation, leading to a loss of trust among users, shareholders, and the broader public. This could potentially translate into a decline in user numbers, revenue, and market share. Furthermore, regulatory landscapes are dynamic and can change swiftly due to legislative amendments, court decisions, or shifts in policy enforcement. If the third-party provider fails to adapt to these changes promptly, BNC might find itself out of compliance unintentionally, exposing the company to the aforementioned risks.

We rely on Amazon Web Services for a portion of our cloud infrastructure in certain areas, and as a result any disruption of AWS would negatively affect our operations and significantly harm our business.

We rely on Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) a third-party provider for a portion of our backend services, including for some of our high-speed databases, scalable object storage, and message queuing services. For location-based support areas, we outsource certain aspects of the infrastructure relating to our Platform. As a result, our operations depend, in part, on AWS’ ability to protect their services against damage or interruption due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, criminal acts, capacity constraints and similar events. Our developers, creators, and users need to be able to access our Platform at any time, without interruption or degradation of performance. Our Platform depends, in part, on the virtual cloud infrastructure hosted in AWS. Although we have disaster recovery plans that utilize multiple AWS availability zones to support our requirements, any incident affecting their infrastructure that may be caused by fire, flood, severe storm, earthquake or other natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, cyber-attacks, terrorist or other attacks, and other similar events beyond our control, could adversely affect our cloud-native Platform. Any disruption of or interference with our use of AWS could impair our ability to deliver our Platform reliably to our developers, creators, and users.

Additionally, threats or attacks from computer malware, ransomware, viruses, social engineering (including phishing attacks), denial of service or other attacks, employee theft or misuse and general hacking have occurred and are becoming more prevalent in our industry, particularly against cloud-native services and vendors of security solutions. If AWS were to experience any of these security incidents, it could result in unauthorized access to, damage to, disablement or encryption of, use or misuse of, disclosure of, modification of, destruction of, or loss of our data or our developers’, creators’, and users’ data or disrupt our ability to provide our Platform or service.

A prolonged AWS service disruption affecting our Platform for any of the foregoing reasons would adversely impact our ability to serve our users, developers, and creators and could damage our reputation with current and potential users, developers, and creators, expose us to liability, result in substantial costs for remediation, cause us to lose users, developers, and creators, or otherwise harm our business, financial condition, or results of operations. and users. We may also incur significant costs for using alternative hosting cloud infrastructure services or taking other actions in preparation for, or in reaction to, events that damage or interfere with the AWS services we use.

In the event that our AWS service agreements are terminated, or there is a lapse of service, elimination of AWS services or features that we utilize, we could experience interruptions in access to our Platform as well as significant delays and additional expense in arranging for or creating new facilities or re-architecting our Platform for deployment on a different cloud infrastructure service provider, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Risks Relating to Agora

In March 2023, the Company experienced a significant change in its business model as it has shifted its focus towards building out the Platform towards a revenue-generating model and away from the non-core legacy subsidiaries Agora and Zest Labs. As a result of the shift in business strategy, the related risk factors for Agora have been updated accordingly.


As the Company devotes substantially all of its growth capital towards building out the Platform, there may be minimal remaining growth capital, if any, to devote to Agora’s hosting business.

As a result of the Company’s change in business strategy as well as capital constraints, the Company has limited resources to devote to building out Agora’s hosting business. To date, Agora has been unable to fulfill the terms of the MSA it signed with BitNile, Inc. in December 2022, and the Company does not currently have clarity on if it will be able to successfully enter the hosting business.

Agora lacks an operating history in the digital asset hosting space, and its new business is subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties which affect its future viability.

As of March 31, 2023, Agora has invested in a Bitcoin mining business which was then discontinued as Bitstream transitioned to a digital asset hosting model. That business, Bitstream, entered agreements and arrangements for equipment and power contracts. In order to proceed at its first digital asset hosting facility in Texas, it must enter into a long-term contract to purchase electric power from the power grid in Texas and use the power to mine Bitcoin on behalf of third parties as well as take advantage of future power shortages such as the one that affected Texas in the winter of 2021 and may be beginning to occur in Texas in June 2023. Among the risks and uncertainties are:

Agora is currently in discussions with a number of key players in this industry, but has not yet executed any definitive agreements to purchase the power needed from the retail power provider, and if it is able to enter into an agreement for the power, the terms may not be as attractive as it currently expects, which may threaten the profitability of this venture;

Although Agora entered into a MSA for digital asset hosting services for BitNile, Inc. in December 2022, it has not been able to successfully perform its obligations under that contract and does not know if it has the capital resources to fulfill its obligations under this contract or a digital hosting contract for another party now or at any point in the future;

If Agora is unable to enter into a definitive agreement with the power broker, any deposits Agora paid to the power broker will be forfeited and Agora will lack a source of affordable power. This would materially and adversely affect Agora’s ability to operate its digital asset hosting business and its financial condition. Agora has fully expensed the deposits as of March 31, 2023;

Agora purchased and received delivery of 5,000 Canaan AvalonMiner 841 miners; the hashrate versus the Bitcoin reward of these miners is not economically viable at today’s prices, and the market to sell these miners is minimal. As a result, the Company took an impairment charge on these miners for the fiscal year ended on March 31, 2023;

Agora’s team has minimal experience in commercial scale Bitcoin hosting operations;

Agora may have difficulty finding third parties willing to consign its miners to them for the purposes of executing on a hosting agreement;

Because of supply chain disruptions including those relating to computer chips, Agora could encounter delivery delays or other difficulties with the purchase, installing and operating of Agora’s power infrastructure at our facility, which would adversely affect its ability to generate material revenue from its operations;

There are a growing number of well capitalized digital asset hosting companies; and

Bans from governments such as China and New York, together with pending legislation in Congress and other regulatory initiatives threaten the ability to use Bitcoin as a medium of exchange and thus impact the demand for mining and hosting;

For all of these reasons, Agora’s digital asset hosting business may not be successful.

Agora is subject to risks associated with its need for sufficient real property and a continuous source of significant electric power at economically favorable prices, and its current efforts, outstanding litigation against Bitstream, and negotiations for these resources to commence and grow operations at its West Texas facilities may ultimately be unsuccessful.

Agora’s Bitcoin mining operations require both land on which to install mining equipment and significant amounts of electric power to operate such equipment. On December 10, 2021, Bitstream entered into a lease agreement pursuant to which Bitstream leased 20 acres of land for an initial term of 10 years and a subsequent term of 10 years to set up mining equipment in West Texas in exchange for monthly payments equal to 3% of the electricity costs. If Bitstream does not use the leased land for 12 consecutive months, the lease will terminate. On January 3, 2022, Agora finalized a land purchase agreement for a separate parcel of 20 acres of land ($12,500 per acre) in West Texas for $250,000, of which $125,000 was paid for by Priority Power Management (“PPM”) to assist in the funding as Agora goes through the registration statement process. Agora has no obligation to repay PPM and it has no ownership of the land. Agora has an option to sell back this land to the sellers at $400 per acre upon cessation of the land being used as a data center.


Additionally, Agora has already paid $1,096,000 to a power broker for assistance in obtaining 12 megawatts (“MW”) of electricity at this site, with the potential to increase the available capacity at the substation to 48 MW. Agora had entered into a second letter of intent for a second location in October 2021 where it has already paid $1,326,500 and committed to pay $1,628,000 upon the execution of a definitive agreement; however, these high costs and uncertainties may harm its ability to become profitable, particularly if the price of Bitcoin declines further or if Agora is unable to enter into definitive agreements for the power on favorable terms or at all. While Agora has arranged for the delivery of the transformers necessary to use up to 42 MW (with agreement to go to 78 MW in the next six to twelve months) of electricity, Agora has conditional and unconditional rights to two sites in West Texas for up to 372 MW, subject to approval by the local government, which is the only required approval needed. If Agora or the third parties with whom it contracts should fail to obtain, deliver and install the necessary items for the required energy as and when needed and on commercially viable terms, its results of operations and financial condition will be materially adversely affected. There may not be an alternative source of electricity, or the resources needed to access it, and the establishment and growth of Agora’s Bitcoin mining operations may be stifled or hindered as a result. The Company received $865,000 related to the deposits paid and expensed the remaining amounts related to these agreements in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023.

The Company’s lack of capital has hindered Bitstream’s operations and resulted in various litigation related to Bitstream for lack of payment or lack of contract performance. On April 22, 2022, BitStream Mining and Ecoark Holdings were sued in Travis County, Texas District Court (Docket #79176-0002) by Print Crypto Inc. in the amount of $256,733.28 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate BitStream Mining’s Bitcoin mining operation. On July 15, 2022, BitStream Mining and two of their Management were parties to a petition filed in Ward County District Court by 1155 Distributor Partners-Austin, LLC d/b/a Lonestar Electric Supply in the amount of $414,026.83 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate the Company’s Bitcoin mining operation. On October 17, 2022, BitStream Mining was a party to a petition filed in Ward County District Court by VA Electrical Contractors, LLC in the amount of $1,666,187.18 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate the Company’s Bitcoin mining operation. See Legal Proceedings on page 38, for additional information.

Additionally, Agora’s digital asset hosting operations could be materially and adversely affected by prolonged power outages, and it may have to reduce or cease its operations in the event of an extended power outage, or as a result of the unavailability or increased cost of electric power as occurred in Texas in the winter of 2021. While Agora intends to participate in the responsive reserve program of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, or ERCOT, should this issue arise, which could offset some or all of the revenue losses, were this were to occur, its business and results of operations could nonetheless be materially and adversely affected, particularly if the reserve program fails.

Agora’s digital asset hosting costs could outpace its digital asset hosting revenues, which would continue to put a strain on its business or increase its losses.

Agora’s digital asset hosting operations will be costly and its expenses may increase in the future. This expense increase may not be offset by a corresponding increase in hosting revenue. Agora’s expenses may be greater than it anticipates, and its investments to make its digital asset hosting business more efficient may not succeed and may outpace monetization efforts. For example, if prices of Bitcoin decline or remain low, and power costs increase, Agora’s ability to become profitable will also decline. Similarly, increases in Agora’s costs without a corresponding increase in its revenue would increase our losses and could seriously harm our financial condition.

We are subject to a highly evolving regulatory landscape and any adverse changes to, or our failure to comply with, any laws and regulations could adversely affect our business, prospects or operations.

Our business is subject to extensive laws, rules, regulations, policies and legal and regulatory guidance, including those governing securities, commodities, crypto asset custody, exchange and transfer, data governance, data protection, cybersecurity and tax. Many of these legal and regulatory regimes were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet, mobile technologies, crypto assets and related technologies. As a result, they do not contemplate or address unique issues associated with the crypto economy, are subject to significant uncertainty, and vary widely across U.S. federal, state and local and international jurisdictions. These legal and regulatory regimes, including the laws, rules and regulations thereunder, evolve frequently and may be modified, interpreted and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdiction to another, and may conflict with one another. Moreover, the complexity and evolving nature of our business and the significant uncertainty surrounding the regulation of the crypto economy requires us to exercise our judgement as to whether certain laws, rules and regulations apply to us, and it is possible that governmental bodies and regulators may disagree with our conclusions. To the extent we have not complied with such laws, rules and regulations, we could be subject to significant fines and other regulatory consequences, which could adversely affect our business, prospects or operations. As Bitcoin has grown in popularity and in market size, the Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Congress and certain U.S. agencies (e.g., the CFTC, SEC, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) have begun to examine the operations of the Bitcoin network, Bitcoin users and the Bitcoin exchange market. Regulatory developments and/or our business activities may require us to comply with certain regulatory regimes. For example, to the extent that our activities cause us to be deemed a money service business under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act, we may be required to comply with FinCEN regulations, including those that would mandate us to implement certain anti-money laundering programs, make certain reports to FinCEN and maintain certain records.


If politics in the United States, particularly the climate change movement, continues to affect Bitcoin mining, it could materially and adversely affect Agora’s business and future results of operation and financial condition.

Bitcoin mining uses very large amounts of electricity to operate the high speed computers used in mining. Because West Texas presently has low electricity rates, Agora arranged for power supplies there to support its planned operations. On November 23, 2022, the Governor of New York signed into law a bill passed by the State of New York legislature, which imposed a two-year moratorium on certain cryptocurrency mining, including Bitcoin mining. While this action does not directly impact Agora’s current operations, which would be conducted in Texas, it may be the beginning of a new wave of climate change regulations aimed at preventing or reducing the growth of Bitcoin mining in the U.S., including potentially jurisdictions in which Agora now operates or may in the future operate. While New York is currently a state under Democratic control and very supportive of climate change regulations in contrast to Texas, there is a risk that Democrats may gain control of Texas and enact legislation that would make Agora’s operations in Texas economically inviable. Further if other states begin to adopt legislation that makes cryptocurrency mining prohibitively expensive or bans it, it could create a surge of demand in Texas and increase the cost of power there. The above-described developments could also demonstrate the beginning of a regional or global regulatory trend in response to environmental and energy preservation or other concerns surrounding cryptocurrencies, and similar action in a jurisdiction in which Agora operates or in general could have devastating effects to our operations. If further regulation follows, it is possible that the digital asset hosting industry may not be able to adjust to a sudden and dramatic overhaul to our ability to deploy energy towards the operation of mining equipment.

The crypto economy is novel and has little to no access to policymakers or lobbying organizations, which may harm our ability to effectively react to proposed legislation and regulation of crypto assets or crypto asset platforms adverse to our business.

As crypto assets have grown in both popularity and market size, various U.S. federal, state and local and foreign governmental organizations, consumer agencies and public advocacy groups have been examining the operations of crypto networks, users and platforms, with a focus on how crypto assets can be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities, fund criminal or terrorist enterprises, and the safety and soundness of platforms and other service providers that hold crypto assets for users. Many of these entities have called for heightened regulatory oversight, and have issued consumer advisories describing the risks posed by crypto assets to users and investors. For instance, in July 2019, then-U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin stated that he had “very serious concerns” about crypto assets. In recent months, members of Congress have made inquiries into the regulation of crypto assets, and Gary Gensler, Chair of the Commission, has made public statements regarding increased regulatory oversight of crypto assets. Outside the United States, several jurisdictions have banned so-called initial coin offerings, such as China and South Korea, while Canada, Singapore, Hong Kong, have opined that token offerings may constitute securities offerings subject to local securities regulations. In July 2019, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority proposed rules to address harm to retail customers arising from the sale of derivatives and exchange-traded notes that reference certain types of crypto assets, contending that they are “ill-suited” to retail investors due to extreme volatility, valuation challenges and association with financial crimes. In May 2021, the Chinese government called for a crackdown on Bitcoin mining and trading, and in September 2021, Chinese regulators instituted a blanket ban on all crypto mining and transactions, including overseas crypto exchange services taking place in China, effectively making all crypto-related activities illegal in China. In January 2022, the Central Bank of Russia called for a ban on cryptocurrency activities ranging from mining to trading, and on March 8, 2022, President Biden announced an executive order on cryptocurrencies which seeks to establish a unified federal regulatory regime for currencies.

The crypto economy is novel and has little to no access to policymakers and lobbying organizations in many jurisdictions. Competitors from other, more established industries, including traditional financial services, may have greater access to lobbyists or governmental officials, and regulators that are concerned about the potential for crypto assets for illicit usage may affect statutory and regulatory changes with minimal or discounted inputs from the crypto economy. As a result, new laws and regulations may be proposed and adopted in the United States and internationally, or existing laws and regulations may be interpreted in new ways, that harm the crypto economy or crypto asset platforms, which could adversely impact our business.

Agora’s hosting operations, including the miners, the housing infrastructure, the land and the facilities as a whole in which its miners are operated, are subject to risks related to uninsured or underinsured losses and potential damage and contingencies for which it may not be adequately prepared.

Agora’s initial facilities are, and any future facilities it may establish will be, subject to a variety of risks relating to housing all of its operations, which include keeping expensive revenue-generating equipment at a single physical location. Agora had insurance covering general liability, but elected to forgo renewing the policy until it has clear visibility into the future viability of its hosting operations. If, upon reviewing this policy and commencing hosting operations, the policy may not cover all potential losses fully or at all. For example, Agora’s facilities could be rendered inoperable, temporarily or permanently, as a result of a fire or other natural disaster or by a terrorist or other attack on a facility. The security and other measures Agora takes to protect against these risks may not be sufficient. In the event of an uninsured or under-insured loss, including a loss in excess of insured limits, at any of the miners in Agora’s network, such miners consigned to it for hosting by a third party, may not be adequately repaired in a timely manner or at all and Agora may lose some or all of the future revenues which could have otherwise been derived from such miners. To the extent the miners, the housing infrastructure in which they are held, or the land itself is permanently damaged, Agora may not be able to bear the cost of repair or replacement. Should any of these events transpire, Agora may not be able to recover, could lose a material amount of potential revenue, and its business and results of operations could be materially harmed as a result.


Agora has had difficulty and expects to continue to have difficulty collecting on its $4,250,000 note receivable received in exchange for its divestiture of Trend Holdings.

Agora was issued a Senior Secured Promissory Note by Trend Ventures, LP on June 16, 2022. The Trend Ventures Note was the consideration paid to Agora for the acquisition of Trend Discovery Holdings. The Trend Ventures Note is in the principal amount of $4,250,000. As of the date of this Annual Report, Agora has not received any principal or interest payments on this note. Agora amended the note on May 15, 2023 to allow Trend Ventures additional time to obtain the necessary resources for repayment. See Note 25 in our consolidated financial statements for details on the amendment. The Company has fully reserved this note receivable and accrued interest receivable as of March 31, 2023.

Risks Relating to Zest Labs

As the Company devotes substantially all of its growth capital towards building out the Platform, there may be minimal remaining growth capital, if any, to devote towards maintaining, licensing, or selling Zest Lab’s intellectual property or towards current or future intellectual property litigation.

As a result of the Company’s change in business strategy as well as capital constraints, the Company has had limited resources to devote to maintaining, licensing or selling Zest Lab’s intellectual property. Furthermore, the Company has limited resources to devote to current and future litigation other than that litigation which has been secured properly by a litigation funding firm.

Our ability to return shareholder value with respect to Zest Labs depends to a large extent on the outcome of the litigation related to protection of our intellectual property rights.

As previously disclosed, in April 2021, a federal jury found in our favor on three claims and awarded us damages in our lawsuit against Walmart Inc. and judgment was entered in our favor that same month. For more information including disclosure on recent events, see Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” in this Report.

We expect that Walmart will appeal the District Court’s decision. Intellectual property and similar litigation is subject to uncertainty. There is no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts related to this lawsuit or if we are, what amounts we will be able to compete successfully against current orrecover.

General Risks

Our future competitors. Increased competition in mobile data capture products, software, and related products and solutions, or supplies may result in price reductions, lower gross profit margins, and loss of market share, and could require increased spending on research and development, sales and marketing, and customer support. Some competitors may make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships with suppliers or companies that produce complementary products, which may create additional pressuressuccess depends on our competitive position inability to retain and attract high-quality personnel, and the marketplace.

Sales to manyefforts, abilities and continued service of our target customers involve long sales and implementation cycles, which may cause revenues and operating results to vary significantly.

A prospective customer’s decision to purchase our services or products may often involve lengthy evaluation and product qualification processes. Throughout the sales cycle, we anticipate often spending considerable time educating and providing information to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of our services and products. Budget constraints and the need for multiple approvals within these organizations may also delay the purchase decision. Failure to obtain the timely required approval for a particular project or purchase decision may delay the purchase of our services or products. As a result, we expect that the sales cycle for some of our services and products will typically range from 90 days to more than 360 days, depending on the availability of funding to the prospective customer. These long cycles may cause delays in any potential sale, and we may spend a large amount of time and resources on prospective customers who decide not to purchase our services or products, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

Additionally, some of our services and products are designed for corporate customers, which requires us to maintain a sales force that understands the needs of these customers, engages in extensive negotiations and provides high-level support to complete sales. If we do not successfully market our services and products to these targeted customers, our operating results will be below our expectations and the expectations of investors and market analysts, which would likely cause the price of our common stock to decline.

senior management.

5

 

We will not be able to develop or continue our business if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain a number of highly skilled employees and on the service and performance of our senior management team and other key personnel.personnel for each of our subsidiaries particularly with the planned spin-offs. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees and inadequate succession planning could cause substantial disruption to our business operations, deplete our institutional knowledge base and erode our competitive advantage, which would adversely affect our business. Competition for qualified personnel possessing the skills necessary to implement our strategy is intense, and we may fail to attract or retain the employees necessary to execute our business model successfully. We do not have obtained “key person” life insurance policies covering certain employees.any of our executive officers.

 

Our success will depend to a significant degree upon the continued contributionsefforts of our key management, engineering and other personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. In particular, we believe that our future success is highly dependent on Randy May, ourthe roles of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer Peter Mehring, President of Zest Labs(“CEO”) and Ken Smerz, President of Eco3d. If Messrs.Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) as well as the shared staff in AAI that are currently managing BNC. In conjunction with the BNC transaction, the Company’s CEO, Randy May, Mehring or Smerz, or any otherand CFO, Jay Puchir, plan to depart the Company in good standing at a future date when the Company’s preferred shareholder, AAI, elects to appoint new officers in the Company, presuming that Nasdaq permits AAI to make such appointments. Additionally, the key members of our management team, leave our employment, ourpersonnel in the Company’s core business could sufferin AAI are currently working in dual roles within AAI and the share price of our common stock would likely decline. Although we have entered into an employment agreement with each of Messrs. May, Mehring and Smerz, one or more of them may voluntarily terminate his services at any time.

If we do not protect our proprietary information and prevent third parties from making unauthorized use of our products and technology, our financial results could be harmed.

Much of our software and underlying technology is proprietary. We seek to protect our proprietary rights through a combination of confidentiality agreements and through copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws. However, all of these measures afford only limited protection and may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented by third parties. Any patent licensed by us or issued to us could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or rights granted thereunder may not provide a competitive advantage to us. Furthermore, patent applications that we file may not result in issuance of a patent or, if a patent is issued, the patent may not be issuedable to devote full time efforts towards BNC.

Deterioration of global economic conditions could adversely affect our business.

The global economy and capital and credit markets have experienced exceptional turmoil and upheaval over the past several years. Ongoing concerns about the systemic impact of potential long-term and widespread recession and potentially prolonged economic recovery, volatile energy costs, fluctuating commodity prices and interest rates, volatile exchange rates, geopolitical issues, including the recent outbreak of armed conflict in Ukraine, natural disasters and pandemic illness, instability in credit markets, cost and terms of credit, consumer and business confidence and demand, a form that is advantageouschanging financial, regulatory and political environment, and substantially increased unemployment rates have all contributed to us. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights, others may independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around our patentsincreased market volatility and other rights. In addition, it is difficult to monitor compliance with,diminished expectations for many established and enforce, our intellectual property in a cost-effective manner.

Third parties claiming that we infringe their proprietary rights could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and prevent us from selling our products and services.

From time to time, we might receive claims that we have infringed the intellectual property rights of others,emerging economies, including claims regarding patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Because of constant technological change in the marketsthose in which we compete, the extensive patent coverage of existing technologies, and the rapid rate of issuance of new patents, it is possibleoperate. Furthermore, austerity measures that the number of these claimscertain countries may grow.In addition, former employers of our former, current, or future employees may assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosedagree to us the confidential or proprietary information of these former employers. Any such claim, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation and distract management from day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in defending such claims, we could be required to stop selling, delay shipments of, or redesign our products, pay monetary amounts as damages, enter into royalty or licensing arrangements, or satisfy indemnification obligations that we have with some of our customers. We cannot assure you that any royalty or licensing arrangements that we may seek in such circumstances will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We may incur significant expenditures to investigate, defend and settle claims related to the use of technology and intellectual property rights as part of any debt crisis or disruptions to major financial trading markets may adversely affect world economic conditions and have an adverse impact on our strategy to manage this risk.

Periods of sustainedbusiness. These general economic adversity and uncertainty could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Demand for our services and products depend in large part upon the level of capital and maintenance expenditures by many of our customers. Lower budgetsconditions could have a material adverse effect on the demand for our services and products, and our business,cash flow from operations, results of operations cash flow and overall financial condition would suffer.condition.

 

Disruptions


The availability, cost and terms of credit also have been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid markets and wider credit spreads. Concern about the stability of the markets generally, and the strength of counterparties specifically, has led many lenders and institutional investors to reduce credit to businesses and consumers. These factors have led to a decrease in spending by businesses and consumers over the past several years, and a corresponding slowdown in global infrastructure spending. 

Continued uncertainty in the financialU.S. and international markets may have an adverse impact on regional and world economies and credit markets, which could negatively impactprolonged stagnation in business and consumer spending may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition, and the availabilityliquidity and cost of capital for us and our customers. These conditions may reduce the willingness or abilityfinancial condition of our customers, and prospective customers to commit funds to purchase our services or products, or their ability to pay for our services after purchase. These conditions could result in bankruptcy or insolvency for some customers, which would impact our revenue and cash collections. These conditions could also result in pricing pressure and less favorable financial terms in our contracts andincluding our ability to access capital markets and obtain capital lease financing to fund our operations.meet liquidity needs.

 

Patents, trademarks, copyrights and licenses are important toNo assurance of successful expansion of operations.

Our significant increase in the Company’s business,scope and the inabilityscale of our operations, including the hiring of additional personnel, has resulted in significantly higher operating expenses. We anticipate that our operating expenses will continue to defend, obtain or renewincrease. Expansion of our operations may also make significant demands on our management, finances and other resources. Our ability to manage the anticipated future growth, should it occur, will depend upon a significant expansion of our accounting and other internal management systems and the implementation and subsequent improvement of a variety of systems, procedures and controls. We cannot assure that significant problems in these areas will not occur. Failure to expand these areas and implement and improve such intellectual property could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

The Company currently holds rights to patentssystems, procedures and copyrights relating to certain aspects of its solar panel technology, RFID technology, software, and services. In addition, the Company has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service markscontrols in the U.S. andan efficient manner at a number of foreign countries for "Intelleflex," the Intelleflex logo, "Zest," "Zest Data Services," the Zest logo, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Although the Company believes the ownership of such patents, copyrights, trademarks and service marks is an important factor in its business and that its success does depend in part on the ownership thereof, the Company relies primarily on the innovative skills, technical competence, and marketing abilities of its personnel.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to include intellectual property obtained from third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods, the Company believes, based upon past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that such licenses could be obtained at all.

6

Final assembly of certain products is performed by third-party manufacturers. We may be dependent on these third-party manufacturers as a sole-source of supply for the manufacture of such products.

A failure by such manufacturers to provide manufacturing services to us, or any disruption in such manufacturing services, may adversely affectpace consistent with our business results. We may incur increased business disruption risk due to the dependence on these third-party manufacturers, as we are not able to exercise direct control over the assembly or related operations of certain of our products. If these third-party manufacturers experience business difficulties or fail to meet our manufacturing needs, then we may be unable to satisfy customer product demands, lose sales, and be unable to maintain customer relationships. Longer production lead times may result in shortages of certain products and inadequate inventories during periods of unanticipated higher demand. Without such third parties continuing to manufacture our products, we may have no other means of final assembly of certain of our products until we are able to secure the manufacturing capability at another facility or develop an alternative manufacturing facility. This transition could be costly and time consuming. 

Failure of information technology systems and breaches in data security could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

Information technology system failures and breaches of data security could disrupt the Company’s operations by causing delays or cancellation of customer orders, impeding the manufacture or shipment of products, or resulting in the unintentional disclosure of customer or Company information. Management has taken steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security and internal control measures. There can be no assurance, however, that a system failure or data security breach will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot assure that attempts to expand our marketing, sales, manufacturing and customer support efforts will succeed or generate additional sales or profits in any future period. As a result of the Company’sexpansion of our operations and the anticipated increase in our operating expenses, along with the difficulty in forecasting revenue levels, we expect to continue to experience significant fluctuations in its results of operations.

If we cannot manage our growth effectively, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We experienced a significant change in our business model as we have shifted its focus towards building out the Platform towards a revenue-generating model and away from the legacy subsidiaries Agora and Zest Labs. Our business model relies on our ability to generate revenue through gaming and sweepstakes events in the metaverse, which is a nascent industry. Businesses that grow rapidly often have difficulty managing their growth while maintaining their compliance and quality standards. If we grow as rapidly as we anticipate, we will need to expand our management by recruiting and employing additional executive and key personnel capable of providing the necessary support. There can be no assurance that our management, along with our staff, will be able to effectively manage our growth. Our failure to meet the challenges associated with rapid growth could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which require, among other things, that public companies maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.

Although our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2023, any failure to maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement in the future could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired, which could result in loss of investor confidence and could have an adverse effect on our stock price.

If our accounting controls and procedures are circumvented or otherwise fail to achieve their intended purposes, our business could be seriously harmed.

We evaluate our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and annually review and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting in order to comply with the Commission’s rules relating to internal control over financial reporting adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or our management does not timely assess the adequacy of such internal control, we may be subject to regulatory sanctions, and our reputation may decline. 


Failure of information technology systems or data security breaches, including as the result of cyber security attacks, affecting us, our business associates, or our industry, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

 

The Company is subject to risks associated with laws, regulationsWe depend on information technology systems and industry-imposed standards related to wireless communications devices.

Lawsservices in conducting our business. We and regulations related to wireless communications devicesothers in the many jurisdictionsindustries in which Zest Labs operateswe operate use these technologies for internal purposes, including data storage and seeksprocessing, transmissions, as well as in our interactions with our business associates. Examples of these digital technologies include analytics, automation, and cloud services. If any of our financial, operational, or other data processing systems are compromised, fail or have other significant shortcomings, it could disrupt our business, require us to operate are extensive and subject to change. Such changes, which could include but are not limited to restrictions on production, manufacture, distribution, and use of the device, mayincur substantial additional expenses, result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company’sour financial condition and operating results.

 

Wireless communication devices,For example, the operator of the Colonial Pipeline was forced to pay $4.4 million in ransom to hackers as the result of a cyberattack disabling the pipeline for several days in May 2021. The attack also resulted in gasoline price increases and shortages across the East Coast of the United States. As we depend on the availability and price of gasoline in our transportation business, any significant increase in the price and/or shortage of gasoline such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates, which maythat experienced from the May 2021 cyberattack would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial conditionour business and operating results. Additionally, our Agora operations depend on the functioning of Bitcoin mining computers and digital wallets maintained by third parties, which are also subject to enhanced risks of a cyberattack as a result.

 

The Company relies on accessOur limited ability to third-party patentsprotect our proprietary information and technology may adversely affect our ability to compete, and our products could infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others, resulting in claims against us, the results of which could be costly.

Many of our products consist entirely or partly of proprietary technology owned by us. Although we seek to protect our technology through a combination of copyrights, trade secret laws and contractual obligations, these protections may not be sufficient to prevent the Company’swrongful appropriation of our intellectual property, nor will they prevent our competitors from independently developing technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our proprietary technology. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. In order to defend our proprietary rights in the technology utilized in our products from third party infringement, we may be required to institute legal proceedings, which would be costly and would divert our resources from the development of our business. If we are unable to successfully assert and defend our proprietary rights in the technology utilized in our products, our future results could be materially adversely affected if it is alleged or found to have infringed intellectual property rights.affected.

 

ManyAlthough we attempt to avoid infringing known proprietary rights of Zest Labs’third parties in our product development efforts, we may become subject to legal proceedings and claims for alleged infringement from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Any claims relating to the infringement of third-party proprietary rights, even if not meritorious, could result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention and resources, require us to reengineer or cease sales of our products or require us to enter into royalty or license agreements which are designednot advantageous to include third-party intellectual property, and itus. In addition, parties making claims may be necessaryable to obtain an injunction, which could prevent us from selling our products in the U.S. or abroad.

Future sales of our common stock in the public market could lower the price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise funds in future securities offerings.

Of 2,522,816 shares of common stock outstanding as of July10, 2023, approximately 2,212,944 shares are held by investors who are not our affiliates or holders of restricted stock. Of these 2,522,816 shares, 2,329,420 shares are unrestricted freely tradeable stock and 193,396 shares are being held as restricted shares. The remaining shares may be sold subject to the volume limits of Rule 144 which limits sales by any affiliate to the greater of 1% of outstanding shares in any three-month period or the average weekly trading volume over a four-week period. Future sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the then prevailing market price of our common stock and could make it more difficult for us to raise funds in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspectsthrough an offering of its products and business methods. Although the Company believes that, based on past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, there is no assurance that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable terms or at all.our securities.

 

BecauseThe price of technological changes in the business software, web and device applications, sensors and sensor-based devices, and RFID and wireless communication industries, current extensive patent coverage, and the rapid issuance of new patents, itour common stock is possible that certain components of Zest Labs’ products and business methods may unknowingly infringe the patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. From timesubject to time, Zest Labs may be notified that it may be infringing such rights. Respondingvolatility, including for reasons unrelated to such claims, regardless of their merit, can consume significant time and expense. In certain cases, the Company may consider the desirability of entering into licensing agreements, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. If there is a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting the Company from marketing or selling certain products or a successful claim of infringement against the Company requires it to pay royalties to a third party, the Company’s financial condition andour operating results could be materially adversely affected.

The inability to obtain certain raw materials could adversely impact the Company’s ability to deliver on its contractual commitmentsperformance, which could negatively impact operationslead to losses by investors and cash flows.costly securities litigation.

 

Although most components essential to the Company's business are generally available from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID custom integrated circuits, and application-specific integrated circuits are currently obtained by the Company from single or limited sources. Magnolia SolarThe trading price of our common stock is also developing nanostructured optical coating technology to improve the solar cell performance. The raw materials for this effort are glass, quartz, silicon wafers and nitrogen gas. Some key components, while currently available to the Company from multiple sources, are at times subject to industry-wide availability constraints and pricing pressures. If the supply of a key or single-sourced component to the Company werelikely to be delayed or curtailed orhighly volatile and could fluctuate in the event a key manufacturing vendor delayed shipment of completed productsresponse to the Company, the Company's ability to ship related products in desired quantities, and in a timely manner, could be adversely affected. The Company's business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source, or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source. Continued availability of these components may be affected if suppliers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the Company's requirements. The Company attempts to mitigate these potential risks by working closely with these and other key suppliers on product introduction plans, strategic inventories, coordinated product introductions, and internal and external manufacturing schedules and levels. Consistent with industry practice, the Company acquires components through a combination of formal purchase orders, supplier contracts, and open orders based on projected demand information. However, adverse changes in the supply chain of the Company’s vendors may adversely impact the supply of key components. 

7

Our solar products have never been sold on a commercial basis, and we do not know whether they will be accepted by the market.

According to the BP Statistical Review of World Energy published in 2016, the cumulative installed solar PV capacity was about 231 Gigawatt hours at the end of 2015. Total global production of electricity was about 24,098 terawatt hours in 2015. Thus, at the end of 2015 less than 1 percent of electric power came from solar photovoltaic sources. Even with many advances in the solar photovoltaic technology, adoption of solar photovoltaic power technology by energy users remains low and the total solar electricity production capacity remains well below one percent of the world consumption of electricity. Thus, the solar energy market is at a relatively early stage of development and the extent to which solar modules will be widely adopted is uncertain. If our products are not accepted by the market, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition will suffer. Moreover, demand for solar modules in our targeted markets may not develop or may develop to a lesser extent than we anticipate. The development of a successful market for our proposed products and our ability to sell them at a lower price per watt may be affected by a number of factors, manysome of which are beyondmay be outside our control, including but not limited to:to, the following factors:

 

failure to produce solar power products that compete favorably against other solar power productsfuture developments within BNC or the Platform and the results of any shareholder vote on the basis of cost, qualityBNC transaction and performance;any Nasdaq listing concerns arising from the BNC transaction;

competition from conventional energy sources and alternative distributed generation technologies, such as wind energy;changes in market valuations of companies in the nascent metaverse industry;

failurefuture events related to develop and maintain successful relationships with suppliers, distributors and strategic partners; andthe market for Bitcoin including regulation;


customer acceptancethe timing and record dates regarding the Company’s announced spin-offs;

regulatory initiatives from the Biden Administration;

specific regulations relating to the nascent industry of gaming or sweepstakes games in the metaverse;

announcements of developments by us or our competitors;

the continuation of the stock market slump, rising interest rates, and any related adverse events affecting the economy;

announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, capital commitments, significant contracts, or other material developments that may affect our prospects;

the results of the Walmart litigation;

actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;

adoption of new accounting standards affecting our industry;

future planned departures of the Company’s CEO, CFO, and CAO to be replaced by appointees by AAI, the Company’s most significant shareholder;

additions or departures of other key personnel or directors;

sales of our products. common stock or other securities in the open market; and

 

other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

If

The stock market is subject to significant price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against such a company. Litigation initiated against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our proposed products fail to gain sufficient market acceptance,management’s attention and Company resources, which could harm our business plans, prospects, results of operations and financial condition may suffer.condition.

 

Our ability to manufacture and distribute commercially viable solar cells is unproven, which could have a detrimental effect on our ability to generateYou will experience dilution if we issue additional equity securities in future financing transactions or sustain revenues.

The technologies we will use to manufacture solar cells have never been utilized on a commercial basis. Our technology, while intended to create highly efficient solar cells may never achieve technical or commercial viability. Allunder derivative securities outstanding as of the tests conducteddate of this Report.

We have stock options and warrants outstanding that are exercisable for shares of our common stock, and as a result of our sale of Series A Preferred Stock in June of 2022 to date by usAult Lending, a wholly owned subsidiary of AAI, Ault Lending could convert additional shares of the Series A and cause dilution to the Company’s other investors. To the extent that such outstanding securities are converted into shares of our common stock, or securities are issued in future financings, our investors may experience dilution with respect to the technology have been performedtheir investment in a limited scale environment and the same or similar results may not be obtainable at competitive costs on a large-scale commercial basis. We have never utilized technology under the conditions orus.

Future changes in the volumes that will be required for us to be profitable and cannot predict allfair value of the difficulties that may arise. Accordingly, our technology may not perform successfully on a commercial basis and may never generate any revenues or be profitable. 

The reduction or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives for on-grid solar electricity applications could reduce demand for our solar modules and harm our business plans.

The reduction, elimination or expiration of government subsidies and economic incentives for solar electricityoutstanding warrants could result in the diminished competitivenessvolatility of solar energy relative to conventional and non-solar renewable sourcesour reported results of energy, which would negatively affect the growthoperations.

Because of the solar energy industry overall. We believe thatderivative liability caused by our outstanding warrants, the near-term growth of the market for on-grid applications, where solar energy is used to supplement the electricity a consumer purchasesincrease or decrease in our common stock price each quarter (measured from the utility network, depends significantly onfirst day to the availability and size of government and economic incentives. Currently the cost of solar electricity substantially exceeds the retail price of electricity in every significant market in the world. Aslast day) is either a result, federal, state and local governmental bodies in many countries have provided subsidies in the form of tariffs, rebates, tax write-offs and other incentives to end-users, distributors, systems integrators and manufacturers of photovoltaic products. Many of these government incentives could expire, phase-out over time, exhaust the allocated fundingnon-cash expense or require renewal by the applicable authority. Even thoughincome. If the price of electricity from conventional sources continuesrises, we are required to rise,report the expense, which increases our actual operating loss. Contrarily a reduction, elimination or expiration of government subsidies and economic incentives for solar electricity could resultprice decrease in the diminished competitiveness of solar energy,a given quarter will cause us to report income. The risk is principally that investors will react to our reported bottom line, which wouldwill increase volatility in turn hurt our sales and financial condition.stock price.

 

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS

We have a substantial number of authorized common andBecause we can issue “blank check” preferred shares available for future issuance thatstock without shareholder approval, it could cause dilution of our stockholders’ interests and adversely impact the rights of holders of our common stock.

 

WeUnder our Articles of Incorporation, subject to the approval of the Series A holder, Ault Lending, our Board of Directors, may approve an issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock without seeking shareholder approval, though in certain cases Nasdaq approval could be required. Any additional shares of preferred stock that we issue in the future may rank ahead of our common stock in terms of dividend or liquidation rights and may have a total of 100,000greater voting rights than our common stock. In addition, such preferred stock may contain provisions allowing those shares to be converted into shares of common stock, and 5,000 shares of preferred stock authorized for issuance. As of March 10, 2017, we have 39,176 shareswhich would dilute the value of common stock issuedto current shareholders and outstanding and no preferred shares issued or outstanding. As of March 10, 2017, we had 55,369 shares of common stock and 5,000 shares of preferred stock available for issuance. Further, out of the 60,824 unissued shares of common stock, as of March 10, 2017, we have 5,455 shares available for future grants under our stock incentive plans. Up to 1,043 shares may be issued related to conversion of convertible notes and warrants described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements that describes events subsequent to December 31, 2016. We may seek financing that could result in the issuance of additional shares of our capital stock and/or rights to acquire additional shares of our capital stock. We may also make acquisitions that result in issuances of additional shares of our capital stock. Those additional issuances of capital stock would result in a significant reduction of the percentage interest of existing or future investors. Furthermore, the book value per share of our common stock may be reduced. This reduction would occur if the exercise price of any issued warrants, the conversion price of any convertible notes or the conversion ratio of any issued preferred stock is lower than the book value per share of our common stock at the time of such exercise or conversion.

The addition of a substantial number of shares of our common stock into the market or by the registration of any of our other securities under the Securities Act may significantly and negatively affect the prevailing market price for our common stock. The future sales of shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and options may have a depressive effect on the market price of our common stock, as such warrants and options would be more likely to be exercised at a time when the price of our common stock is greater than the exercise price.

8

We effected our 1-for-250 reverse stock split on March 18, 2016. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with the minimum price requirements or minimum equity levels of the NASDAQ Capital Market.

We effected our 1-for-250 reverse stock split on March 18, 2016, with the intent to list our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market. We effectuated the reverse stock split in order to achieve the requisite increase in the market price of our common stock to be in compliance with the minimum price requirements of the NASDAQ Capital Market. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock or our stockholders’ equity will remain at the levels required for continuing compliance with the requirements. In any event, other factors unrelated to the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, such as negative financial or operational results, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In addition, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or stockholders’ equity and jeopardizepreventing a change in control of our abilityCompany. Although we have no present intention to maintain the NASDAQ Capital Market’s minimum price and equity requirements.

There may not be an active market forissue any additional shares of our common stock.

Our commonauthorized preferred stock, is quoted on the OTCQX which is maintained by the OTC Market Group Inc. under the symbol “EARK”. However, no assurance can be given that an active trading market for our common stock will further develop and continue. As a result, it may become more difficult to purchase, dispose of and obtain accurate quotations as to the value of our common stock. If we are unable to achieve the NASDAQ Capital Market listing requirements, our common stock would continue to trade on the OTCQX.

Following the reverse stock split, the market price of our common stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not improve.

Although we believe that a higher market price of our common stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, there can be no assurance that we will not do so in the future.


The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members.

We are a public company and subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls for financial reporting. For example, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that our management report on the effectiveness of our internal controls structure and procedures for financial reporting. Section 404 compliance may divert internal resources and will take a significant amount of time and effort to complete. If we fail to maintain compliance under Section 404, or if our internal control over financial reporting continues to not be effective as defined under Section 404, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the NYSE American, the Commission, or other regulatory authorities. Furthermore, investor perceptions of our company may suffer, and this could cause a decline in the market price of our common stock. Any failure of our internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our stated results of operations and harm our reputation. If we are unable to implement these changes effectively or efficiently, it could harm our operations, financial reporting or financial results and could result in an adverse opinion on internal controls from our independent auditors. We may need to hire a number of additional employees with public accounting and disclosure experience in order to meet our ongoing obligations as a public company, particularly if we become fully subject to Section 404 and its auditor attestation requirements, which will increase costs. Our management team and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to new investors,compliance initiatives and to meeting the obligations that are associated with being a public company, which may divert attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they change their recommendations regarding our stock adversely, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. Our research coverage by industry and financial analysts is currently limited. Even if our analyst coverage increases, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

The elimination of monetary liability against our directors, officers and employees under law and the existence of indemnification rights for or obligations to our directors, officers and employees may result in substantial expenditures by us and may discourage lawsuits against our directors, officers and employees. 

Our articles of incorporation contains a provision permitting us to eliminate the personal liability of our directors to us and our stockholders for damages for the breach of a fiduciary duty as a director or officer to the extent provided by Nevada law. We may also have contractual indemnification obligations under any future employment agreements with our officers. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in us incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and the resulting costs may also discourage us from bringing a lawsuit against directors and officers for breaches of their fiduciary duties and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our stockholders against our directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock and, accordingly, stockholders must rely on stock appreciation for any return on their investment.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board and will depend on various factors, including institutional investors. In addition, there can be no assurance thatour operating results, financial condition, future prospects and any other factors deemed relevant by our Board. You should not rely on an investment in our company if you require dividend income from your investment in our company. The success of your investment will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation of the market price of our common stock, will satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. As a result, the trading liquidity ofwhich is uncertain and unpredictable. There is no guarantee that our common stock may not necessarily improve.will appreciate in value. 

 

Our stock could be subjectBecause the COVID-19 pandemic has had a material adverse effect on the economy, the uncertainty relating to volatility.

The market price of our common stockits continuation may fluctuate significantly in response tohave a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly and annual results;
changes in market valuations of companies in our industry;
announcements by us or our competitors of new strategies, significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic relationships, joint ventures, capital commitments or other material developments that may affect our prospects;
shortfalls in our operating results from levels forecasted by management;
additions or departures of key personnel;
sales of our capital stock in the future;
liquidity or cash flow constraints; and,
fluctuations in stock market prices and volume, which are particularly common for the securities of emerging technology companies, such as us.

We may not pay dividendsfuture adverse effect on our common stockbusiness, results of operations, and future prospects.

The global COVID-19 pandemic and the unprecedented actions taken by U.S. federal, state and local governments and governments around the world in order to stop the spread of the virus had a profound impact on the U.S. and global economy, disrupting global supply chains and creating significant volatility in the foreseeable future.financial markets.

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock to date. We are unlikely to pay dividends at any time in the foreseeable future; rather, we are likely to retain earnings, if any, to fund our operations and to develop and expand our business.

 

9


 

 

Future salesWhile COVID-19 seems to no longer threaten the economy as it did, supply chain shortages seem to have evolved from COVID-19. Moreover, the risk of a serious new COVID-19 strain or other serious virus evolving remains.

Disruptions and/or uncertainties related to a new strain of COVID-19 for a sustained period of time could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and issuancesfinancial condition. Supply chain delays and shortages of Bitcoin miners and other equipment such as transformers may adversely affect BitNile especially its plans to further develop and monetize its metaverse business. Increased transportation, electrical supply, labor or other costs which may result from COVID-19 could have a material adverse effect on our capital stock or rights to purchase capital stock could result in additional dilutionfinancial condition, and results of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our stock price to decline.operations.

 

We continue to issue additional securitiesFurthermore, the effect of another serious COVID-19 outbreak on financial markets and on our Company may limit our ability to raise capital. Future sales and issuances of ouradditional capital stockin the future on the terms acceptable to us at the time we need it, or rights to purchase our capital stock could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders. We may sell common stock, convertible securities and other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner as we may determine from time to time. If we sell any such securities in subsequent transactions, our stockholders may be materially diluted. New investors in such subsequent transactions could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock.all.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

Because we are a smaller reporting company, this section is not applicable.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

Item 2. PropertiesHeadquarters

 

The Company does not own any real property. It currently leases office and production space atin San Antonio, Texas for its headquarters but recently subleased the following locations: Rogers, Arkansas; Phoenix, Arizona; Flowery Branch, Georgia; Albany, New York; San Jose, California; and Woburn, Massachusetts. The Flowery Branch locationoffice space out to a new tenant as the Company is a manufacturing facility that contains extrusion and other equipment. The other locations are principallyminimizing its office facilities located in office buildings or office parks.space to save costs. The current property lease runs through November 2023.

The Company currently leases are considered adequatespace through October 2026 in Charleston, South Carolina for operationsAgora’s offices.

Bitcoin Mining Facilities

Agora owns a separate parcel of 20 acres in West Texas which it purchased for $250,000 on January 3, 2022, of which $125,000 was paid for by PPM to assist in the funding as Agora goes through the registration statement process. Agora has no obligation to repay PPM and do not extend beyond five years.they have no ownership of the land. Agora has an option to sell back this land to the sellers at $400 per acre upon cessation of the land being used as a data center. Agora intends to use the land for its Bitcoin mining operations.

We currently anticipate that the current leased space will be sufficient to support our current and foreseeable future needs.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Litigation Matters

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, we may becomeThe Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operationsfrom other matters in the normalordinary course of business. We are regularly subject to claims, suits, regulatory and government investigations, and other proceedings involving labor and employment, commercial disputes, and other matters. Such claims, suits, regulatory and government investigations, and other proceedings could result in fines, civil penalties, or other adverse consequences.

Certain of these outstanding matters include speculative, substantial or indeterminate monetary amounts. We record a liability when we believe that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If we determine that a loss is reasonably possible and the loss or range of loss can be estimated, we disclose the reasonably possible loss. We evaluate developments in our legal matters that could affect the amount of liability that has been previously accrued, and the matters and related reasonably possible losses disclosed, and make adjustments as appropriate. Significant judgment is required to determine both likelihood of there being and the estimated amount of a loss related to such matters.

With respect to our other outstanding matters, based on our current knowledge, we believe that the amount or range of reasonably possible loss will not, presently involvedeither individually or in any pending legal proceeding or litigation other than one suit filed to collect a receivable from a customer. To the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of our properties or businesses are subject, which would reasonably be likely toaggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, the Company.outcome of such matters is inherently unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties. 

On August 1, 2018, Ecoark and Zest Labs filed a complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest Labs a total of $115 million in damages (subsequently reduced to $110 million) which includes $65 million in compensatory damages (subsequently reduced to $60 million) and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. liable on three claims. The federal jury found that Walmart Inc. misappropriated Zest Labs’ trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest Labs’ trade secrets. We expect Walmart to continue to vigorously defend the litigation and to oppose the verdict in post-trial motions and an appeal. The Company has filed post-trial motions to add an award for its attorneys’ fees as the prevailing party in the litigation. In addition to other post-trial motions, Walmart, Inc. has filed a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for remittitur or a new trial. As of the date of this Report, the court has allowed post-trial discovery but has not ruled on the motion for new trial.


On September 21, 2021, Ecoark Holdings and Zest Labs filed a complaint against Deloitte Consulting, LLP (“Deloitte”) in the Eight Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada. The complaint was for violation of the Nevada Uniform Trade Secret Act and was also seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages. Zest Labs began working with Deloitte in 2016, in a confidential matter in a pilot program that Zest Labs had been engaged for by Walmart. Zest Labs engaged in significant discussions, presentations, demonstrations, and information downloads with Deloitte who specifically acknowledged that this information was confidential. In June 2023, this case was dismissed.

On April 22, 2022, BitStream Mining and Ecoark Holdings were sued in Travis County, Texas District Court (Docket #79176-0002) by Print Crypto Inc. in the amount of $256,733.28 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate BitStream Mining’s Bitcoin mining operation. The defendants intend to vigorously defend themselves and have filed counterclaims in the 353rd Judicial District in Travis County, Texas on May 6, 2022 for fraudulent inducement, breach of contract, and for payment of attorney’s fees and costs. The Company provided additional documents to our attorneys on October 7, 2022, and there is no update since then. The Company has accrued the full amount of the claim in its consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023.

On July 15, 2022, BitStream Mining and two of their Management were parties to a petition filed in Ward County District Court by 1155 Distributor Partners-Austin, LLC d/b/a Lonestar Electric Supply in the amount of $414,026.83 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate the Company’s Bitcoin mining operation. The Company filed a petition to remove one of its Management from the claim in December 2022, and there is no update since then. The Company has accrued the full amount of the claim in its consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023.

On October 17, 2022, BitStream Mining was a party to a petition filed in Ward County District Court by VA Electrical Contractors, LLC in the amount of $1,666,187.18 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate the Company’s Bitcoin mining operation. The Company’s registered agent was served with this lawsuit on January 3, 2023, the Company answered the claim in January, and is in process of supplying documents for discovery. The Company has accrued the full amount of the claim in its consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023.

In the opinion of management, there are no legal matters involving us that would have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

 

10

 

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity SecuritiesInformation

 

Market Information

Our common stock from April 22, 2016, was quotedis listed on the OTCQB market and since December, 2016 on the OTCQX market maintained by the OTCThe Nasdaq Capital Market Group Inc. under the symbol “EARK”“BNMV”. From February 6, 2010 to April 21, 2016,The last reported sale price of our common stock was listed on the over the counter market under the symbol MGLT. The following table sets forth the high and low prices for our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the OTCQB/QX. These prices have been retroactively adjusted for the reverse 1-for-250 stock split that occurredNasdaq on March 18, 2016, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 4:C.July 10, 2023 was $1.04.

 

Holders

2017 HIGH  LOW 
First Quarter (through March 10) $7.10  $   3.99 

 

2016 HIGH  LOW 
First Quarter $18.00  $8.65 
Second Quarter $22.00  $12.00 
Third Quarter $21.00  $7.00 
Fourth Quarter $   9.25  $  4.48 

2015 HIGH  LOW 
First Quarter $12.50  $3.75 
Second Quarter $17.53  $5.00 
Third Quarter $6.50  $3.75 
Fourth Quarter $15.00  $2.50 

Holders

As of March 10, 2017, the last reported sales price reported on the OTC Markets Inc. for our common stock was $7.10 per share. As of the date of this filing,Annual Report, we had approximately 717898 holders of record of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is IslandPacific Stock Transfer, located at 15550 Roosevelt Boulevard,6725 Via Austi Pkwy, Suite 301, Clearwater, Florida 33760.300, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119.

 

Dividends

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. The payment of dividends on our common stock in the future will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, operating and financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors may consider appropriate. As long as the Series A is outstanding, we are precluded from paying dividends except to the holder of the Series A.

We currently expect to use all available funds to finance the future development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162023 other than those transactions previously reported to the SEC on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

 

None.

 

ITEM 6. RESERVED

11

 

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not required.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Item 7. Management’s DiscussionThis Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among others, (a) our expectations about possible business combinations, (b) our growth strategies, (c) our future financing plans, and Analysis(d) our anticipated needs for working capital. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of Financial Conditionthe words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “approximate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “budget,” “could,” “forecast,” “might,” “predict,” “shall” or “project,” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. This information may involve known and Results of Operations

The following management’s discussionunknown risks, uncertainties, and analysis of financial conditionother factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. These statements may be found in this Annual Report.

Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and results of operations describesassumptions regarding our business, potential target businesses, the principal factors affectingeconomy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the results of our operations, financial condition,future, by their nature, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks, and changes in financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction withcircumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the accompanying audited financialforward-looking statements and notes thereto, included elsewhereas a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” in this report. TheAnnual Report, changes in local, regional, national or global political, economic, business, competitive, market (supply and demand) and regulatory conditions and the following:

Adverse economic conditions;

Our ability to effectively execute our business plan;

Inability to raise sufficient additional capital to operate our business;

Our ability to manage our expansion, growth and operating expenses;

Our ability to evaluate and measure our business, prospects and performance metrics;

Our ability to compete and succeed in highly competitive and evolving industries;

Our ability to respond and adapt to changes in technology and customer behavior;

Our ability to protect our intellectual property and to develop, maintain and enhance a strong brand; and

Other specific risks referred to in the section entitled “Risk Factors”.

We caution you therefore that you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements as statements of historical fact or as guarantees or assurances of future performance. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other information contained herein unless required by law.

Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this discussionAnnual Report is included based on information available to us that we believe is accurate. It is generally based on academic and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities offerings or economic analysis. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to a numberthe same qualifications and the additional uncertainties accompanying any estimates of risksfuture market size, revenue and uncertainties. We urge youmarket acceptance of products and services. Except as required by U.S. federal securities laws, we have no obligation to review carefullyupdate forward-looking information to reflect actual results or changes in assumptions or other factors that could affect those statements. See the sections of this reportsection entitled “Risk Factorsand “Forward-Looking Statementsfor a more completedetailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties associatedthat may have an impact on our future results.

Overview

BitNile Metaverse, Inc. (“BitNile Metaverse,” “Ecoark Holdings” or the “Company”) is a holding company, incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 19, 2007. Through September 30, 2022, Ecoark Holdings’ former subsidiaries with an investment in our securities.

Dollar amountsthe exception of Agora Digital Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Agora”) and numbers of shares that followZest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs”) have been treated as divested for accounting purposes. See Notes 1 and 2 to the financial statements included in this report are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.

OVERVIEW

Ecoark Holdings has grown overAnnual Report. As a result of the past three years through key acquisitionsdivestitures, all assets and organic growth. Ecoark Holdings is an innovative, emerging growth company focusedliabilities of the former subsidiaries have been reclassified to discontinued operations on the developmentconsolidated balance sheet for March 31, 2022 and deploymentall operations of business solutionsthese companies have been reclassified to discontinued operations and products togain on disposal on the retail, agriculture, food service, commercial real estate and architecture, engineering and construction end markets. Ecoark Holdings has assembled an experienced management team and a portfolio of proprietary, patented technologies to address the waste in operations, logistics and supply chain.

Ecoark effected a reverse acquisition of the Magnolia Solar Corporation on March 24, 2016 (also referred to as the Merger). Accounting standards required that the transaction be accounted for as an acquisition by Ecoark, therefore the 2015 financialconsolidated statements and results up through the acquisition date of March 24, 2016 are those of Ecoark, not including Magnolia Solar Corporation. The 2016 results of Magnolia Solar subsequent to the acquisition consisted of $254 of expenses and no revenues, so no further discussion of Magnolia Solar is included in the results of operations for Ecoark Holdings discussed below.the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023.

 

Prior to the recent divestitures, the Company’s principal subsidiaries consisted of Ecoark, Inc. (“Ecoark”), a Delaware corporation that was the parent of Zest Labs, Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”) and Agora which was assigned the membership interest in Trend Discovery Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation (all references to “Trend Holdings” or “Trend” are now synonymous with Agora) from the Company on September 17, 2021 upon its formation, which includes Bitstream Mining, LLC, the Company’s Bitcoin mining subsidiary.


Recent Developments

During the current fiscal year ending March 31, 2023, the Company engaged in the following transactions:

On July 25, 2022 the Company sold White River Holdings Corp (“White River”) and with it its oil and gas production business to White River Energy Corp, formerly Fortium Holdings Corp. (“WTRV”) in exchange for 1,200 shares of WTRV’s non-voting Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “WTRV Series A”). Subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Certificate of Designation of the WTRV Series A, the WTRV Series A will become convertible into 42,253,521 shares of WTRV’s common stock upon such time as (A) WTRV has filed a Form S-1, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and such Form S-1 has been declared effective, and (B) BitNile Metaverse elects to distribute shares of its common stock to its stockholders. The Form S-1, as amended, is pending SEC Staff review.

On August 23, 2022 the Company sold Banner Midstream, which consisted of its transportation business to Wolf Energy Services, Inc. (formerly Enviro Technologies US, Inc.) (“Wolf Energy”) in exchange for 51,987,832 shares of the Wolf Energy common stock.
In September 2022, the Company announced a record date of September 30, 2022 for the spin-offs of common stock of Wolf Energy and WTRV to holders of the Company’s common stock and preferred stock (on an as-converted basis).

Agora entered into a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”) on December 7, 2022 with Bitnile, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Ault Alliance, Inc. (“AAI”), whereby BitNile, Inc. agreed to provide mining equipment which Agora would host at its West Texas location and supply the electricity for the cryptocurrency mining. The MSA requires Agora to initially provide up to 12MW of electricity at the West Texas site for BitNile Inc.’s use. An additional 66MW of power can be made available to BitNile Inc. as well for a total of 78MW. To meet this obligation, the Company is required to raise at least $5,000,000 to enable the build out of the hosting facility, including the initial 12MW of power within 45 days of the date of the MSA, which deadline was not met.

On January 24, 2023, the Company entered into an At-The-Market (“ATM”) Issuance Sales Agreement with Ascendiant Capital Markets, LLC (“Ascendiant”) as sales agent, pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell from time to time, through Ascendiant, shares of the Company’s common stock, with offering proceeds of up to $3,500,000. In connection with the ATM offering, the Series A holder agreed to reduce its secondary offering of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A it holds by $3,500,000. The ATM offering has been terminated as of June 16, 2023 because it had achieved its objective of raising capital of approximately $3,500,000.

On February 8, 2023, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “SEA”) by and among AAI, the owner of approximately 86% of BitNile.com, Inc. (“BNC”), and the minority stockholders of BitNile.com (the “Minority Shareholders”). Pursuant to thehe SEA, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of BitNile.com as well as the common stock of Earnity, Inc. beneficially owned by BNC (which represents approximately 19.9% of the outstanding common stock of Earnity, Inc. as of the date of the SEA), in exchange for the following: (i) 8,637.5 shares of newly designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company to be issued to Ault (the “Series B”), and (ii) 1,362.5 shares of newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company to be issued to the Minority Shareholders (the “Series C,” and together with the Series B, the “Preferred Stock”). The Series B and the Series C, the terms of which are summarized in more detail below, each have a stated value of $10,000 per share (the “Stated Value”), for a combined stated value of $100,000,000, and subject to adjustment are convertible into a total of up to 13,333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock, which represent approximately 92.4% of the Company outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis. The Company has independently valued the Series B and Series C as of the date of acquisition. The combined value of the shares issued to AAI was $53,913,000 using a blended fair value of the discounted cash flow method and option pricing method. See Note 3 for the details on the asset acquisition and Note 17 for details on the Series B and C Preferred Stock.

The terms of the Series B and Series C as set forth in the Certificates of Designations of the Rights, Preferences and Limitations of each such series of Preferred Stock (each, a “Certificate,” and together the “Certificates”) are essentially identical except the Series B is super voting and must approve any modification of various negative covenants and certain other corporate actions as more particularly described below.

Pursuant to the Series B Certificate, each share of Series B is convertible into a number of shares of the Company’s common stock determined by dividing the Stated Value by $7.50, or 1,333 shares of common stock, subject to Nasdaq and shareholder approval. The conversion price is subject to certain adjustments, including potential downward adjustment if the Company closes a qualified financing resulting in at least $25,000,000 in gross proceeds at a price per share that is lower than the conversion price. The Series B holders are entitled to receive dividends at a rate of 5% of the Stated Value per annum from issuance until February 7, 2033 (the “Dividend Term”). During the first two years of the Dividend Term, dividends will be payable in additional shares of Series B rather than cash, and thereafter dividends will be payable in either additional shares of Series B or cash as each holder may elect. If the Company fails to make a dividend payment as required by the Series B Certificate, the dividend rate will be increased to 12% for as long as such default remains ongoing and uncured. Each share of Series B also has an $11,000 liquidation preference in the event of a liquidation, change of control event, dissolution or winding up of the Company, and ranks senior to all other capital stock of the Company with respect thereto other than the Series C with which the Series B shares equal ranking. Each share of Series B is entitled to vote with the Company’s common stock at a rate of 300 votes per share of common stock into which the Series B is convertible.


In addition, for as long as at least 25% of the shares of Series B remain outstanding, AAI (and any transferees) must consent rights with respect to certain corporate events, including reclassifications, fundamental transactions, stock redemptions or repurchases, increases in the number of directors, and declarations or payment of dividends, and further the Company is subject to certain negative covenants, including covenants against issuing additional shares of capital stock or derivative securities, incurring indebtedness, engaging in related party transactions, selling of properties having a value of over $50,000, altering the number of directors, and discontinuing the business of any subsidiary, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

On April 27, 2023, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”) providing for the issuance of (i) Senior Secured Convertible Notes (individually, a “Note” and collectively, the “Notes”) with an aggregate principal face amount of $6,875,000, which Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock (the “Conversion Shares”); and (ii) five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,100,905 shares of common stock. The maturity date of the Notes is April 27, 2024.

Pursuant to the SPA, we and certain of our subsidiaries and Arena Investors, LP, as the collateral agent on behalf of the Investors (the “Agent”) entered into a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), pursuant to which we (i) pledged the equity interests in our subsidiaries and (ii) granted to the Investors a security interest in, among other items, all of our deposit accounts, securities accounts, chattel paper, documents, equipment, general intangibles, instruments and inventory, and all proceeds therefrom (the “Assets”). In addition, pursuant to the Security Agreement, the subsidiaries granted to the Investors a security interest in its Assets and, pursuant to a subsidiary guarantees, jointly and severally agreed to guarantee and act as surety for our obligation to repay the Notes and other obligations under the SPA, the Notes and Security Agreement (collectively, the “Loan Agreements”).

The Notes have a principal face amount of $6,875,000 and bear no interest (unless an event of default occurs) as they were issued with an original issuance discount of $1,375,000. The maturity date of the Notes is April 27, 2024. The Notes are convertible, subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations, into Conversion Shares at a price per share equal to the lower of (i) $3.273 or (ii) the greater of (A) $0.504 and (B) 85% of the lowest volume weighted average price of our common stock during the ten (10) trading days prior to the date of conversion (the “Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price is subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of common stock at a price per share lower than the Conversion Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events.


The terms, rights, preferences and limitations of the Series C are substantially the same as those of the Series B, except that the Series B holds certain additional negative covenant and consent rights, and Series C holders vote with the Company’s common stock on an as-converted basis, subject to Nasdaq and shareholder approval. The Company is required to maintain a reserve of authorized and unissued shares of common stock equal to 200% of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, which is initially 26,666,667 shares.

Pending shareholder approval of the transaction, the Series B and the Series C combined are subject to a 19.9% beneficial ownership limitation. That limitation includes shares of Series A issued to Ault Lending on June 8, 2022 and any common stock held by Ault Lending. Certain other rights are subject to shareholder approval as described below. The SEA provides that the Company will seek shareholder approval following the closing, which occurred March 6, 2023. The entire transaction is subject to compliance with Nasdaq Rules and the Series B and Series C Certificates each contain a savings clause that nothing shall violate such Rules. Nasdaq may nonetheless disregard the savings clause.

Under the SEA, effective at the closing AAI is entitled to appoint three of the Company’s directors, and following receipt of approval from the Company’s shareholders, a majority of the Company’s directors. To date, AAI has only sought, and received, the appointment of one individual as a director. The SEA also provides the holders of Preferred Stock with most favored nations rights in the event the Company offers securities with more favorable terms than the Preferred Stock for as long as the Preferred Stock remains outstanding. Under the SEA, while any Preferred Stock is outstanding, the Company is prohibited from redeeming or declaring or paying dividends on outstanding securities other than the Preferred Stock. Further, the SEA prohibits the Company from issuing or amending securities at a price per share below the conversion price of the Preferred Stock, or to engage in variable rate transactions, for a period of 12 months following the closing.

The SEA further provides that following the closing the Company will prepare and distribute a proxy statement and hold a meeting of its stockholders to approve each of the following: (i) the SEA and the transactions contemplated thereby, (ii) a ratification of the Third Certificate Designations of Rights, Preferences, and Limitations of the Series A, (iii) a reverse stock split with a range of between 1-for 2 and 1-for-20 (which rations may be amended), (iv) a change in the Company’s name to BitNile Metaverse, Inc., (v) an increase of the Company’s authorized common stock to 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock; and (vi) any other proposals to which the Parties shall mutually agree. In addition, pursuant to the SEA the Company agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to effect its previously announce spin-offs of the common stock of Wolf Energy and White River held by or issuable to the Company, use its best efforts to complete one or more financings resulting in total gross proceeds of $100,000,000 on terms acceptable to AAI, and financially support the ongoing Zest Labs litigation. The holders of the Series B and Series C will not participate in the aforementioned spin-offs and distribution. In connection with the SEA, the Company and AAI also agreed that the net litigation proceeds from the Zest Labs litigation that was ongoing as of November 15, 2022 would be held in a trust for the benefit of the Company’s stockholders of record as of such date.

In connection with the SEA, the Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with AAI and the Minority Shareholders pursuant to which the Company agreed to file a registration statement on Form S-3 or Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) registering the resale by the holders of the Preferred Stock and/or the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, to be initially filed within 15 days of the closing, and to use its best efforts to cause such registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC within 45 days thereafter, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

The SEA contains certain representations and warranties made by each of the Company, AAI and the Minority Shareholders. Since the closing, BNC has continued as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,  BNC’s principal business entails the development and operation of a metaverse platform, the beta for which launched on March 1, 2023. This transaction closed on March 7, 2023.

On March 15, 2023, following approval of the Board of Directors in accordance with Nevada law, the Company filed Articles of Merger with the Nevada Secretary of State, thereby merging a newly-formed shell corporation into the Company which was the surviving corporation. As permitted by Nevada law, pursuant to the merger the Company’s name was changed to BitNile Metaverse, Inc. The name change, which was effective immediately, was made in connection with the Company’s previously disclosed acquisition of BNC.


The Company’s principal sourcegoal is to spin-off all of revenuesthe Wolf Energy common stock and WTRV common stock to the Company’s shareholders in 2016calendar year 2023, although because of regulatory delays or other reasons we may not meet that deadline.  

Future Spin-Offs

As described in this Annual Report, BitNile Metaverse’s goal is to spin-off its common stock of White River and 2015Wolf Energy. While the Company previously planned on spinning off Zest Labs common stock through the filing of a Form 10 with the Securities Exchange Commission, the Company decided not to proceed with that spin-off. Due to market conditions, the Company decided it was Pioneer Products’inadvisable to seek to raise capital for Zest Labs, which it needed to operate as a stand-alone public company. To protect the Company’s shareholders, it granted its shareholder of record as of September 30, 2022 the right to receive 95% of any the potential net proceeds realized from either the Zest Labs litigation with Walmart and Deloitte, which is described under Note 15 to the financial statements contained in this Annual Report. That right is part of the Zest Labs certificate of incorporation. Under the SEA, the Series B and Series C preferred shareholders agreed that they will not participate in any of these distributions if the transaction closes. The Company currently plans to transfer all of the common stock of Zest Labs Inc. into a limited liability company, of which any net proceeds from the sale or licensing of recycled plastics productsZest intellectual property or the aforementioned potential net proceeds from Zest litigation would be distributed to the Company’s shareholders of record as of November 15, 2022.

Following the above transactions, the Company’s only remaining subsidiaries are Agora, which ceased mining Bitcoin but is now exploring operating as a hosting company for Bitcoin mining ventures, and Zest Labs which holds technology and related intellectual property rights for fresh food solutions and is not operating due to ongoing litigation involving its technology an intellectual property.

Segment Reporting for the Year ended March 31, 2023 and 2022:

As a result of the sales of White River and Banner Midstream, and the immaterial nature of the operations of Zest Labs, the Company no longer segregates its operations as most of the continuing operations are related to Agora.

Key Trends

Impact of Inflation

In 2022 and continuing into 2023, there has been a sharp rise in inflation in the U.S. and globally. Given our limited operations, the most significant future impact will be on employee salaries and benefits and electricity costs.

Impact of COVID-19

COVID-19 may continue to affect the economy and our business, depending on the vaccine rollouts and the emergence of virus mutations as well as the impact of supply chain disruptions.

COVID-19 did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations or the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 included in our Products segment. Sales of products in 2016 were $9,482 which included $4,435 from Sable (a subsidiary of Pioneer), which was acquired in May 2016. Sales of products in 2015 were $5,020. Margins on product sales are minimal.this Report.

Revenues and gross margins for our Services segment represent the results from Eco3d’s mapping, modeling and consulting business. Gross margins in that business have exceeded 60%. The Services segment also includes expenses of Zest Labs. To date Zest Labs has achieved small sales of component products, but no services revenues. Zest Labs’ operating expenses are included in the Services segment and consist principally of $5,979 of research and development expenses in 2016 which were more than double the amount in 2015. The Company believes that Zest Labs’ fresh food management solutions will provide significant services revenues in the future.

The Company incurred significant costs in 2016 relating to raising capital, the acquisitions and compliance with SEC regulatory requirements, including those of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Significant progressCOVID-19 has been achieveda contributing factor in raising additional capitalsupply and labor shortages which have been pervasive in many industries. The extent to which a future COVID-19 outbreak, and other adverse developments may impact on the first quarter of 2017 as described below under LiquidityCompany’s results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and Capital Resources and in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements that describes events subsequent to December 31, 2016.cannot be predicted.

Additional information on our services and products is discussed under the section of this report entitled “Business.”  

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations for Continuing Operations for the YearsYear Ended DecemberMarch 31, 20162023 and 20152022

Revenues

Net sales forThe discussion of our results of operations should be evaluated considering that our primary subsidiaries were sold in the year ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016 were $14,4032023 and their results of operations are now treated as compareddiscontinued operations. Accordingly, period to $7,676period comparisons may not be meaningful.

Revenues

The Company had no revenue in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 (“FY 2023”) and had $27,182 in 2022 (“FY 2022”) as it had just recently commenced Bitcoin mining operations. Agora has recently focused on becoming a hosting company as reflected below. To that end, Agora entered into the MSA with BitNile, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of AAI described above, whereby Agora agreed to host BitNile, Inc.’s cryptocurrency mining equipment at Agora’s West Texas location and supply the electricity for the cryptocurrency mining.

The Company’s Bitcoin operations began in the fiscal year ended DecemberMarch 31, 2015. The 88% increase was attributable to the acquisition of Sable which contributed $4,435 in 20162022 and the expanded operations of Eco3d. Product sales of $9,482 in 2016 increased 89% from the $5,020 achieved in 2015. The increase was principallyceased on March 3, 2022 due to the acquisitionlow price of SableBitcoin and the inability of Agora to timely complete its initial public offering which created a working capital issue. The Company intends to refocus Agora to operating as a hosting company providing infrastructure and energy to cryptocurrency mining enterprises assuming the Company can raise the necessary capital. Unless and until we are successful in May 2016, offset by a small decreasegenerating revenue for Agora or acquire another operating.


The Company’s metaverse operations via BNC are nascent and only launched in sales of Pioneer Products’ plastic products manufacturedMarch 2023, so no revenues were realized from recycled and other material. Revenue from services of $4,921 in 2016 increased 85%those operations from the $2,656 recorded in 2015. Expansiontime of the 3d mapping, modeling and consulting business drovecompletion of the increase in service revenues as Eco3d increased the number of customers which resulted in increases in projects completed for customers.acquisition on March 6, 2023, through fiscal year-end on March 31, 2023.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $11,847FY 2023 were $263,954 as compared to $5,946$183,590 for FY 2022. We expect the cost of revenues to increase once we have commenced Agora’s hosting operations.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses were $27,981,218 for FY 2023 compared to $15,871,208 for FY 2022. The increase from the prior year ended December 31, 2015. The 99% increase was directlyprimarily related to the increasehigher salaries and salaries related costs of $12,105,003 in revenues. The improvement in gross profit from $1,730 in 2015 to $2,556 in 2016 was principally achieved as a result of the growth in higher margin services revenues at Eco3d. Services achieved a gross margin of 63% in 2016 compared with 64% in 2015. However, total gross margin decreased from 23% in 2015 to 18% in 2016 due to the heavier weighing of lower margin product sales. Margins for products were a negative 6% in 2016FY 2023 compared to 0% margin$9,092,412 in 2015. The negative margin for productsFY 2022 related to higher stock-based compensation in 2016 is the result of transformation efforts at Sable subsequent to the acquisition in May 2016.

12

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for 2016 were $27,406 asFY 2023 compared to $11,418 for 2015. The 140% increase of $15,988 was primarily attributable to the increase in operating expenses for our Services segment. The Pioneer Products operational activities described above required relatively limited home office support. Therefore, most of the operating expenses discussed below were allocated to the Services segment. The Services segment includes activities relating to Zest Labs for which the Company has invested considerable resources for support and funding, including expenditures for research and development which are expensed as incurred, the increase in the number of employees to support the revenue growth at Eco3d and costs associated with the Merger and subsequent capital and financing activities.

Salaries and Salary Related Costs

Salaries and related costs for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $7,708, up 149% from $3,090 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase resulted from $2,011 of share-based compensation that did not require cash payments, a $1,645 increase over 2015. That cost was principally derived from estimates of stock option expense calculated using a Black-Scholes model which can vary based on assumptions utilized. Additional information on that equity expense can be found in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, which complies with critical accounting policies driven by Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 718-10. Management was added to the Company in 2016 related to the Merger and to obtain the skills necessary to fulfill regulatory and other requirements of being a publicly traded company. Those additions increased salary and related costs.

Staff was also added at Eco3d to support the expanded operations referred to above regarding the 85% increase in sales as they nearly doubled the number of employees, including client-serving professionals and support staff. The Company also engaged a professional employer organization to handle payroll, benefits and human resources activities, which has positioned the Company for growth and led toFY 2022, an increase in benefits availablebad debt expense of $4,418,229 in FY 2023 compared to zero in FY 2022 due to establishing a full reserve of the principal and associated costs. In addition, a numberinterest receivable of individuals who were previously utilized as contractors became employees.

Professional Fees and Consulting

Professional fees and consulting expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016Trend Ventures Note, higher SG&A costs of $8,559, were up 318% from $2,048 incurred for the year ended December 31, 2015, as a result of costs relating$2,636,454 compared to the Merger, outside servicesFY 2022 primarily related to the Company taking on additional public reporting responsibilities including Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliancedevelopment costs at Agora, and share-based compensation provided to certain contractors and costs associated with subsequent capital and financing arrangements.

Share-based non-cash compensation of $4,697 in 2016 was up from $894 recorded in 2015. A portion of that cost was calculated using a Black-Scholes model which can vary based on assumptions utilized. Additional information on that equity expense can be found in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, which complies with critical accounting policies driven by ASC 505-50. Shares and warrants were provided to investment bankers and attorneys who facilitated the Merger, to other advisors who assisted in raising capital and to other consultants to the Company.

Cash expenses were incurred for attorneys, accountants, financial advisors and other consultants in 2016 that were significantly higher than in 2015. A portion of those costs are not expected to recur, however that will depend on future capital raising activities and other initiatives in which the Company is engaged.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $3,040 compared with $2,253 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was principally due to costs relating to Zest Labs pilot projects conducted with a major retailer and with a fresh food delivery organization.

Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment

Depreciation,depreciation, amortization and impairment expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $2,120of $1,773,120 in FY 2023 compared to $1,226$347,306 in FY 2022 due to impairment of fixed assets of $1,655,969 at Agora.

Other Income (Expense)

Total other expense was ($29,289,682) in FY 2023 compared to total other income of $14,805,382 in FY 2022, almost all of which was non-cash. Change in fair value of derivative liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2015. The 73% increase resulted from impairment chargesFY 2023 was a non-cash gain of $4,312,366 compared to a non-cash gain of $15,386,301 in FY 2022. This variance was related to intangible assets recordedthe changes in our stock price. A change in the Sable acquisition. A reviewfair value of that businessthe preferred stock derivative liability for FY 2023 was a gain of $28,611,760 and a gain of $14,365,276 related to the preferred stock derivative liability at inception was offset by a decrease in the fourth quarter resulted in ceasing business with a number of unprofitable customers, outsourcing densification operations and deciding to sell related equipment as partfair value of the post-acquisition transformation initiatives at Sable.

In the fourth quarterinvestment in White River Energy Corp of 2016, the Company performed($20,775,215) and a review of the recoverability of its long-lived assets in compliance with critical accounting policies under ASC 360. Principally as a result of abandoning Sable customers, impairments were recorded against the customer lists identifiable intangible assets of $553. A related testing of goodwill impairment was performed that resulted in a $682 write-down of the $1,264 recorded in the acquisition. These impairment charges more than offset the reduction of amortization of certain customer list intangibles resulting from the 2013loss on acquisition of Pioneer Products that became fully amortized in September 2015.

DensificationBitnile.com of ($54,484,279), and related equipment at Sable was reduced to estimated fair values totaling $203interest expense, net of costs to sell, and an impairment charge of $326 was recorded. If the estimates of fair value that we consider reasonable are not proven to be accurate, adjustments will be recognized in 2017 when the assets are expected to be sold.

13

Research and Development

Research and development expense increased 114% to $5,979 in 2016 compared with $2,801 in 2015. These costs related primarily to development of the Zest Fresh solution as multiple pilots of the solution were completed in 2016. Significant research and development expenditures related to Zest Fresh are expected to continue.

Interest and Other Expense

($744,895). Interest expense, net of interest income,was ($580,919) in FY 2022.

Net Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

Net loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016FY 2023 was $355($57,534,854) as compared to $785net loss from continuing operations of ($1,222,234) for the year ended December 31, 2015.FY 2022. The 55% decrease was a result of lower interest accruing on related-party debt due to a decrease in interest rates and a shift toward equity capital as opposed to debt. The related-party debt was retired during 2016. Additional information on related-party debt can be found in Notes 9 and 16 to the consolidated financial statements. A loss on retirement of assets at Zest Labs of $25 was recorded in 2016.

Net Loss

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $25,230 as compared to $10,473 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The $14,757 increase in netincreased loss was primarily due to the $15,988loss on acquisition of Bitnile.com, the change in the fair value of the investment in White River Energy Corp, and the increase in operating expenses describedas noted above offset by an increasethe change in the fair value of $826the derivative liability and the change in gross profit and athe preferred stock derivative liability arising from the decrease in net interest expense of $430. Net loss attributable to controlling interest for the years ended December 31, 2016Company’s Common Stock price.

Liquidity and 2015, respectively, was $25,349 and $10,502. As described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward for income tax purposes totaling approximately $53,858 at December 31, 2016 that can be utilized to reduce future income taxes. A valuation allowance has been estimated such that no deferred tax assets have been recognized in the financial statements. Capital Resources

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations, and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. Significant factors in the management of liquidity are fundsrevenue generated byfrom operations, levels of accounts receivable and accounts payable and capital expenditures.

Net cash used in operating activities was $(14,288,177) for FY 2023, as compared to $(17,633,186) for FY 2022. Cash used in operating activities for FY 2023 was primarily caused by the net loss, change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liabilities, and derivative income, offset by loss on acquisition of Bitnile.com, change in value of investment in White River Energy Corp, increases in common shares issued for services, increased bad debt expense and losses on disposal of former subsidiaries without similar amounts in FY 2022 as well as changes in accounts payable and accrued expenses from FY 2022 to FY 2023.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $122,666 for FY 2023 compared to $617,644 for FY 2022. Net cash provided by investing activities in FY 2023 were comprised of proceeds received from the refund of the power development costs partially offset by purchases of fixed assets and discontinued operations, and the amounts provided FY 2022 related to discontinued operations offset by the purchase of fixed assets and power development costs as we commenced operations in Agora.


Net cash provided by financing activities for FY 2023 was $14,147,282 which comprised primarily of proceeds from our June 2022 sale of the Ecoark Holdings Series A, Commitment Shares described elsewhere in this Report. This compared with FY 2022 net cash provided by financing activities of $16,290,804 comprised primarily of the sale of our common stock in a registered direct offering.

As of July 10, 2023, the Company has $3,492 in cash and cash equivalents. The Company believes that the current cash on hand is not sufficient to conduct planned operations for one year from the issuance of the consolidated financial statements and needs to raise capital to support their operations.

To date we have financed our operations through sales of common stock, convertible preferred stock and other derivative securities and the issuance of debt.

At December 31, 2016 and 2015We may also issue common stock, preferred stock or other securities in connection with any business acquisition we hadundertake in the future following our planned spin-offs. Presently we may not raise capital without the consent of the Purchaser.

We will require additional financing to enable us to proceeds with our plan of operations. These cash of $1,495 and $1,962, respectively,requirements are more than our current cash and working capital resources. Accordingly, we will require additional financing to continue operations and to repay our liabilities. There is no assurance that any party will advance additional funds to us to enable us to sustain our plan of $1,470operations or to repay our liabilities.

We anticipate continuing to rely on equity sales of our common stock to continue to fund our business operations, issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to our existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of our equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our planned business activities.

If we are unable to raise the funds that we require to execute our plan of operation, we intend to scale back our operations commensurately with the funds available to us.

On January 24, 2023, the Company entered an ATM Agreement with Ascendiant as sales agent, which contemplates sales of shares of our common stock in a registered “at-the-market” offering for offering proceeds of up to $3,500,000.

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company sold its interests in Banner Midstream in two separate transactions on July 25, 2022 and September 7, 2022. In addition, it sold the non-core business of Trend Discovery on June 17, 2022. The Company expects to distribute the common stock it received (or issuable upon conversion of preferred stock) in the sales to its shareholders upon the effective registration statements for the two entities the companies were sold to. See Note 17, “Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock” for information on the Company’s recent $12 million convertible preferred stock financing. That financing has restrictive covenants that require approval of the investor for the Company to engage in any equity or debt financing. The Company believes that the current cash on hand is not sufficient to conduct planned operations for 12 months from the issuance of the consolidated financial statements and may need to raise capital to support their operations. While the Company entered into the MSA with Ault which if the hosting arrangement is established would provide a source of revenue, as of the date of this Report the Company has not yet met its obligations under the MSA, including raising at least $5,000,000 to establish the initial infrastructure and power for the hosting arrangement. Further, with the acquisition of BNC, we expect to require substantial additional capital to further develop its metaverse platform and launch revenue-generating operations therefrom, and no assurance can be given that we will be able to close that acquisition or that if we are we will be able to leverage the BNC business as needed to generate material revenue or raise the necessary capital. See “Risk Factors” included in this Annual Report.

The accompanying financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, but the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it establishes continued revenue streams and becomes profitable. Management’s plans to continue as a going concern include raising additional capital through sales of equity securities and borrowing. However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans. If the Company is not able to obtain the necessary additional financing on a timely basis, the Company will be required to delay, reduce or perhaps even cease the operation of its business. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.


2018 Line of Credit

On December 28, 2018, the Company entered into a $10,000,000 credit facility that includes a loan and security agreement (the “Agreement”) where the lender agreed to make one or more loans to the Company, and the Company may make a request for a loan or loans from the lender, subject to the terms and conditions. In the year ended March 31, 2023, the Company borrowed $505,181, which includes $17,681 in commitment fees, with the balance of $487,500 being deposited directly into the Company and repaid $810,000 in the year ended March 31, 2023. Interest incurred for the year ended March 31, 2023 was $59,499, and accrued as of March 31, 2023 was $61,722. With the sale of Trend Holdings, we can no longer access this line of credit.

2023 Convertible Notes

On April 27, 2023, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”) providing for the issuance of (i) Senior Secured Convertible Notes (individually, a “Note” and collectively, the “Notes”) with an aggregate principal face amount of $6,875,000, which Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock (the “Conversion Shares”); and (ii) five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,100,905 shares of common stock. The maturity date of the Notes is April 27, 2024.

Pursuant to the SPA, we and certain of our subsidiaries and Arena Investors, LP, as the collateral agent on behalf of the Investors (the “Agent”) entered into a security agreement (the “Security Agreement”), pursuant to which we (i) pledged the equity interests in our subsidiaries and (ii) granted to the Investors a security interest in, among other items, all of our deposit accounts, securities accounts, chattel paper, documents, equipment, general intangibles, instruments and inventory, and all proceeds therefrom (the “Assets”). In addition, pursuant to the Security Agreement, the subsidiaries granted to the Investors a security interest in its Assets and, pursuant to a subsidiary guarantees, jointly and severally agreed to guarantee and act as surety for our obligation to repay the Notes and other obligations under the SPA, the Notes and Security Agreement (collectively, the “Loan Agreements”).

The Notes have a principal face amount of $6,875,000 and bear no interest (unless an event of default occurs) as they were issued with an original issuance discount of $1,375,000. The maturity date of the Notes is April 27, 2024. The Notes are convertible, subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations, into Conversion Shares at a price per share equal to the lower of (i) $3.273 or (ii) the greater of (A) $0.504 and (B) 85% of the lowest volume weighted average price of our common stock during the ten (10) trading days prior to the date of conversion (the “Conversion Price”). The Conversion Price is subject to adjustment in the event of an issuance of common stock at a price per share lower than the Conversion Price then in effect, as well as upon customary stock splits, stock dividends, combinations or similar events.

Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions

The critical accounting policies listed below are those the Company deems most important to its operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, management’s estimate of provisions required for uncollectible accounts receivable, fair value of assets held for sale and assets and liabilities acquired, impaired value of equipment and intangible assets, estimates of discount rates in lease, liabilities to accrue, fair value of derivative liabilities associated with warrants, cost incurred in the satisfaction of performance obligations, permanent and temporary differences related to income taxes and determination of the fair value of stock awards.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC 606”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of the revenue standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle:

Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract

Step 3: Determine the transaction price

Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

Step 5: Recognize revenue when the Company satisfies a performance obligation

In order to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, a company must assess the promised goods or services in the contract and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct” good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria are met: The customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer (i.e., the good or service is capable of being distinct), and the entity’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (i.e., the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct within the context of the contract).

If a good or service is not distinct, the good or service is combined with other promised goods or services until a bundle of goods or services is identified that is distinct.

The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. When determining the transaction price, an entity must consider the effects of all of the following:

Variable consideration

Constraining estimates of variable consideration

The existence of a significant financing component in the contract

Noncash consideration

Consideration payable to a customer

Variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.


The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis. The standalone selling price is the price at which the Company would sell a promised service separately to a customer. The relative selling price for each performance obligation is estimated using observable objective evidence if it is available. If observable objective evidence is not available, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for the promised service. In instances where the Company does not sell a service separately, establishing standalone selling price requires significant judgment. The Company estimates the standalone selling price by considering available information, prioritizing observable inputs such as historical sales, internally approved pricing guidelines and objectives, and the underlying cost of delivering the performance obligation. The transaction price allocated to each performance obligation is recognized when that performance obligation is satisfied, at a point in time or over time as appropriate.

Management judgment is required when determining the following: when variable consideration is no longer probable of significant reversal (and hence can be included in revenue); whether certain revenue should be presented gross or net of certain related costs; when a promised service transfers to the customer; and the applicable method of measuring progress for services transferred to the customer over time. Although, Agora since March 3, 2022, has not recognized revenue from its mining operations, prior to this time, it recognized revenue upon satisfaction of its performance obligation over time in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-27 for its contracts with mining pool operators.

The Company accounts for incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer and contract fulfillment costs in accordance with ASC 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs. These costs should be capitalized and amortized as the performance obligation is satisfied if certain criteria are met. The Company elected the practical expedient, to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset that would otherwise have been recognized is one year or less, and expenses certain costs to obtain contracts when applicable. The Company recognizes an asset from the costs to fulfill a contract only if the costs relate directly to a contract, the costs generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying a performance obligation in the future and the costs are expected to be recovered. The Company recognizes the cost of sales of a contract as expense when incurred or when a performance obligation is satisfied. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are capitalized unless the costs would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract was obtained, are not considered recoverable, or the practical expedient applies.

Hosting Revenues

Agora effective in September 2022 began efforts to generate revenue via hosting agreements. Agora entered into a MSA on December 7, 2022 with Ault, whereby Ault agreed to provide mining equipment which Agora would host at its West Texas location and supply the electricity for the cryptocurrency mining.

When Agora generates hosting revenues, it will follow ASC 606 as outlined above and recognize revenue upon the completion of the performance obligations as stipulated under the MSA.

Gaming Revenue

The authoritative guidance on revenue recognition for gaming revenue is ASC 606. The objectives of ASC 606 are to establish the principles that an entity shall apply to report useful information to users of the financial statements about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a contract with a customer. We determined this would not be subject to ASC 985-605 because the customers cannot take possession of the online games. That is, this type of arrangement would not be accounted for as a transfer of a software license.

Depending on the circumstances, the guidance may be applied on a contract-by-contract basis, or the practical expedient described in ASC 606-10-10-4 of using the portfolio approach may be followed.

The portfolio approach allows an entity to apply the guidance to a portfolio of contracts with similar characteristics so long as the result would not differ materially from the result of applying the guidance to individual contracts. We have determined that the use of the portfolio approach is the most appropriate for our contracts as the terms of service (“TOS”) and related promises or obligations are identical for all customers/gamers.

There were no revenues recognized for gaming during the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.


Step 1: Identify the Contract with the Customer

STEP 1 of the revenue recognition model requires that we identify the contract(s) with a customer. This section discusses the steps to determine whether a contract exists and specific considerations that may impact that determination.

Per ASC 606-10-25-1, the five criteria for identifying a contract are as follows:

1.The parties have approved the contract and are committed to perform.

a.Our contracts consist of TOS for the sale of coins to gamers

2.Each party’s rights are identifiable:

a.Rights are identifiable in contracts with customers and are documented within our Terms of Service

3.Payment terms are identifiable:

a.Payment terms are identifiable in contracts with the end customer. The consideration from the sale of coins comes from gamers and the payment terms are identified prior to entering into the contract and are listed in our TOS.

4.The contract has commercial substance:

a.Generally, an executed sale of coins and related cash flow is evidence of commercial substance.

5.The collection is probable based on the customer’s ability and intent to pay:

a.We collect the consideration from a reputable third-party transaction processor and is not dependent on their collection from the gamers indicating that it is probable we will collect.

Step 2: Identify the Performance Obligations

While there is no explicit promise that we will provide the Metaverse game play service on a continuous basis, we believe that there is an implicit promise to do so. We considered the nature of the implied promise and took in to account the following items that we consider to be relevant to our assessment:

Whether the nature of the implied promise is to provide an enhanced gaming experience through the hosted service over time or to enable the player to consume virtual items immediately

The period over which the enhanced gaming experience is provided if the benefits are consumed throughout the hosting period (e.g., user life, gaming life).

The life span over which, or number of times, the virtual good or item may be accessed or used.

Whether the virtual good or item must be used immediately or can be stored for use later.

How and over what period the virtual item benefits the customer’s gaming experience (e.g., a consumable such as spending coins for game play vs. a durable avatar skin that allows a player to upgrade within the game in such a way that it continues to enhance the game players experience).

If the benefit of purchasing the virtual item or good on the customers gaming experience is temporary or permanent.


We have an obligation to provide a playable game content service to the customer to enable the customer to consume purchased coins within the Metaverse on either additional game play or in-game digital goods. For the sale of consumable virtual items, the Company recognizes revenue as the items are consumed.

As the durable goods (upgraded equipment, clothing, avatars, etc.) are purchased with NC’s and then used throughout the remainder of the life of the gamer, we considered if they were material in the context of the contract and represented a distinct and separate promise or obligation to be recognized over the life of the gamer. We determined that these goods cannot be beneficial on their own without providing of the full Metaverse service with which to utilize the goods and therefore concluded that the goods are not distinct as they do not meet both the criteria in ASC 606-10-25-19 through 606-10-25-21. Due to not being a distinct promise or separately identifiable per ASC 606-10-25-21(c), the durable goods should not be separated from the game play service promise and should be treated as a combined or bundled service with a single performance obligation in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-22.

We also considered the awarded SC’s that can be obtained through marketing giveaways, for purchasing a NC package or by the mailing in of a request for SC’s. We considered if the SC’s were material in the context of the contract and represented a distinct and separate promise or obligation. The SC’s can be redeemed for cash once a certain minimum has been obtained/won through sweepstakes type games. No contract or obligation exists until the SC holder has accumulated a minimum amount of won coins (different than gifted coins) through playing sweepstakes games which is able to be tracked within the system. While not considered material at the individual contract level, we believe the rewards program as a whole could be significant and would convey a material right to the total rewards for all customers once earned (similar to “free” loyalty points earned by a credit card user) and therefore represents a separate performance obligation.

Based on our assessment of the different coins sold above we are able to conclude that there are two separate performance obligations. One to provide playable game content service to the customer to enable the customer to consume purchased coins within the Metaverse on either additional game play or in-game digital goods and the second is to redeem players cash redemptions of SC’s once qualified.

Step 3: Determine the transaction price

The transaction price depends on the coin package selected and is established by the Company’s management and stated in the contract with our customer prior to purchase. Any changes to the price are made prior to a transaction and the updated price is clearly displayed for the customer to see. The gamer indicates their agreement to this price prior to the purchase of the coin package or would not engage further and wouldn’t purchase additional coins. The coin package transaction prices are noted in the table below:

Coin Package Orders Price 
    
10k NILE-T $2 
25k NILE-T / 4 NILE-S $5 
50k NILE-T / 9 NILE-S $10 
100k NILE-T / 20 NILE-S $20 
250k NILE-T / 51 NILE-S $50 
500k NILE-T / 103 NILE-S $100 
1.5M NILE-T / 310 NILE-S $300 


Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations

The transaction price should be allocated between the two performance obligations based on their stand-alone selling prices. The NT’s transaction prices would be allocated completely to the first performance obligation while the NC’s sales would need to be allocated between the first and second obligations. As the SC’s can’t be purchased, the amount allocated to the SC’s redemption for cash obligation should be based on management’s best estimates.

In order to estimate and allocate the transaction price between the two obligations, we considered the following inputs:

The sweepstakes games win percentage

The amount of SC’s it will take to qualify for cash redemption (minimum of 50 won coins accumulated)

The cash value of 1 SC that is available to be redeemed

The likelihood that the cash redemption option will be exercised (breakage of total outstanding SC’s)

The stand-alone selling price of the NC coin packages that include “free” SC’s

The percentage of purchased NC’s consumed during the period

We also took into consideration the reward point allocation example in ASC 606-10-55-353 - 356 as the nature of the obligations and related estimated redemptions are similar in nature.

Based on that example we determined the allocation between NC and SC revenue to be calculated considering the following assumptions:

Total sweeps game win percentage is equal to 4% of all SC’s issued

A minimum of 50 qualifying coins must be accumulated in a players account to be redeemable

We assume that 90% of won coins were actually redeemed (not assumed, just used in example below as most users consume all their SC’s rather than redeem)

The value of 1 redeemable SC is equal to $1

We estimate that 99% of purchased NC’s are consumed during the period they were purchased


Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation

Step 5 of the revenue recognition model requires the company to recognize revenue when (or as) it satisfies a performance obligation.

For the NT and NC coins this is determined by the estimated consumption of purchased coins by the customer which indicates the performance obligation has been satisfied and revenue can be recognized at that point in time. We estimate the amount of outstanding purchased NT and NC virtual currency at period end based on customer behavior, because we are unable to distinguish between the consumption of purchased or free virtual currency. The estimated amount is based on an analysis of the customers’ historical play behavior, the timing difference between when virtual currencies are purchased by a customer and when those virtual currencies are consumed in game play, which historically has been relatively short.

For the SC’s, revenue is recognized when the Company has satisfied its performance obligation (point in time) relating to the redemption of coins for cash as this can be tracked and would not need to be estimated.

We will initially reduce the revenue recognized for the two obligations for the unredeemed coins by booking a contract liability and then recognize the revenue when we have determined the NT and NC coins have been abandoned by the player or have expired and for the SC’s, when the cash reward has been redeemed.

Additional considerations

Principal vs. Agent

We intend to recognize revenues on a gross basis because we have control over the pricing, content and functionality of coins and games on our providers platform. We evaluated our current agreements with our platform providers (Meet Kai) and end-user agreements and based on the preceding, we determined that the Company is the principal in such arrangements and Meet Kai is the agent in accordance with ASC 606-10-55-37. As the principal, the Company recognizes revenue in the gross amount and as such, we treat the percentage of sales paid to Meet Kai as an expense. Any future changes in these arrangements or to our games and related method of distribution may result in a different conclusion.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments such as cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate their respective fair values because of the short-term nature of those financial instruments.


Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not currently use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks, but may explore hedging oil prices in the current fiscal year. Management evaluates all of the Company’s financial instruments, including warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. The Company generally uses a Black-Scholes model, as applicable, to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates when needed. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is remeasured at the end of 2016 comparedeach reporting period. The Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of the derivative liabilities.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In August 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40), Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contract’s in an Entity’s Own Equity. The ASU simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a working capital deficitsingle liability instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for it. The ASU simplifies the diluted net income per share calculation in certain areas.

The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2021, and early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not believe this new guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2021-04 “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation— Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815- 40) Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of $2,153 atFreestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options” which clarifies and reduces diversity in an issuer’s accounting for modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. An entity should measure the endeffect of 2015. The increase in working capital was principally duea modification or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option that remains equity classified after modification or exchange as follows: i) for a modification or an exchange that is a part of or directly related to a modification or an exchange of an existing debt instrument or line-of-credit or revolving-debt arrangements (hereinafter, referred to as a “debt” or “debt instrument”), as the increase fromdifference between the issuancefair value of common stock in a private placement offeringthe modified or exchanged written call option and the decreasefair value of that written call option immediately before it is modified or exchanged; ii) for all other modifications or exchanges, as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the modified or exchanged written call option over the fair value of that written call option immediately before it is modified or exchanged. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity should apply the current portionamendments prospectively to modifications or exchanges occurring on or after the effective date of long-term debt due to repayments of related-party debt and the conversion of debt to equity.amendments. The Company is dependent upon raising additional capital from future financing transactions.

Net cash used in operating activities was $14,097 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $7,671 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Cash used in operating activities is related to the Company’s net loss partially offset by non-cash expenses, including share-based compensation and depreciation, amortization and impairments. 

Net cash used in investing activities was $3,324 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $25 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Net cash used in investing activities is related to purchases and redemptions of certificates of deposit, purchases of property and equipment, anddoes not believe this new guidance will have a pre-acquisition investment in Sable. 

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2016 was $16,954, including $17,575 from the issuance of common stock, primarily $17,320 (net of fees) raised in a private placement offering, proceeds from a line of credit of $500 and proceeds from the exercise of warrants issued in the private placement offering of $487, offset by net repayments of related-party debt of $1,329 and repayments of long-term debt of $279. In 2015, $8,461 received from the sale of common stock was offset by $1,073 net payments of debt.

At December 31, 2016, $1,685 of Ecoark Holdings’ notes payable and current portion of long-term debt was due in 2017 with the remainder of long-term debt of $642 due over the following two years including $628 due in 2018. Future minimum lease payments required under operating leases are as follows: 2017 - $796, 2018 - $753, 2019 - $606, 2020 - $300, and 2021 - $25. Other less significant commitments and contingencies are disclosed in Note 11 to thematerial impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Since our inception, the

The Company has experienced negativedoes not discuss recent pronouncements that are not anticipated to have an impact on or are unrelated to its financial condition, results of operations, cash flow from operations and expects to experience significant negative cash flow from operations in the future. We will need to raise additional funds in the future so that it can continue to expand its operations and repay its indebtedness. The inability to obtain additional capital may restrict our ability to grow and may reduce the ability to continue to conduct business operations. flows or disclosures.

As more fully described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements, subsequent to December 31, 2016 the Company has been successful in raising over $13,000 through convertible notes and securities purchase agreements. Some of those notes have involved related parties, including directors and officers of the Company. We believe that the terms of those notes and agreements are consistent with terms available in the market for similar instruments with commensurate risk. 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2016, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements. 

ItemITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

14

 

Because we are a smaller reporting company, this section is not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The financial statements required by this Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.8 are included in this Annual Report following Item 16 hereof. As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide supplementary financial information.

 

CONSOLIDATEDITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDISCLOSURE

DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

 

TableNot applicable.


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of ContentsDisclosure Controls and Procedures.

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-1
Balance SheetsF-2
Statements of OperationsF-3
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)F-4
Statements of Cash FlowsF-5
Notes to Financial StatementsF-6 - F-26

We are required to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information relating to our company, required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure as a result of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 15pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the parameters set forth above and has concluded that as of March 31, 2023, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as a result of the following material weaknesses:

The Company does not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions.
Lack of formal review procedures including multiple level of review over accounting financial reporting process due to the small size of its accounting staff.
The Company does not have sufficient written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures.
The Company’s financial reporting is carried out with the assistance of an outside financial consultant.

We plan to rectify these weaknesses by implementing written policies and procedures for our internal control of financial reporting, and hiring additional accounting personnel at such time as we have sufficient financial and human capital resources to do so.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting as we completed an asset acquisition of BNC. BNC will now be the primary subsidiary that the operations of the Company are conducted in.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth the positions and offices presently held by each of our current directors and their ages:

Name Age Position Director
Since
Randy S. May 59 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 2016*
Gary M. Metzger 71 Director 2016*
Steven K. Nelson 65 Lead Director 2017
Emily L. Pataki 39 Director 2021
Henry Nisser 54 Director 2023

*Messrs. May and Metzger served on the Board of Directors of Ecoark, Inc. from 2011 and 2013, respectively, until it effected a reverse merger acquisition of the Company, which was formerly known as Magnolia Solar Corporation on March 24, 2016. Messrs. May and Metzger again joined the Board effective on April 11, 2016.

Randy S. May. Mr. May has served as Chairman of the Board since April 11, 2016 and served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from April 13, 2016 through March 28, 2017, and then again from September 21, 2017, to the present. Mr. May also serves as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of White River Energy Corp. Mr. May has also served as the Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Agora, an approximately 90% owned subsidiary of the Company, since September 2021. He previously served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and as Chief Executive Officer of Ecoark, Inc. from its incorporation until its reverse acquisition with Magnolia Solar Corporation in March 2016. Mr. May is a 25-year retail and supply-chain veteran with experience in marketing, operational and executive roles. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. May held a number of roles with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”). From 1998 to 2004, Mr. May served as Divisional Manager for half the United States for one of Walmart’s specialty divisions, where he was responsible for all aspects of strategic planning, finance, and operations for more than 1,800 stores. Mr. May’s qualifications and background that qualify him to serve on the Board include his strong managerial and leadership experience, his extensive knowledge of strategic planning, finance and operations, as well his ability to guide the Company.

Gary M. Metzger. Mr. Metzger has been serving on the Board since March 24, 2016 and served on the Board of Directors of Ecoark, Inc. from 2013 until its reverse merger with Magnolia Solar Corporation in March 2016. Mr. Metzger has 40 years of product development, strategic planning, management, business development and operational expertise. He served as an executive at Amco International, Inc. and Amco Plastics Materials, Inc. (“Amco”), where in 1986 he was named President and served in such role for 24 years until Amco was sold to global resin distribution company, Ravago Americas, in December 2011, where he remains a product developer and product manager. Mr. Metzger was also a co-owner of Amco. In addition to his leadership functions, Mr. Metzger spearheaded research and development for recycled polymers, new alloy and bio-based polymer development, and introduced fragrance into polymer applications. He also developed encrypted item level bar code identification technology, anti-counterfeiting technologies and antimicrobial technologies. The Company believes that Mr. Metzger’s leadership and knowledge of manufacturing companies, product development, strategic planning, management and business development are an asset to the Board. Taken together, these are among the many qualifications and the significant experience that have led to the conclusion that Mr. Metzger is qualified to serve on the Board.

Steven K. Nelson. Mr. Nelson has been serving on the Board and as Chairman of our Audit Committee since April 2017. He was appointed Lead Director in July 2022. Mr. Nelson has also served as a director of Agora since October 2021. From 2015 to 2023, Mr. Nelson was a lecturer for the Department of Accounting at the University of Central Arkansas. Mr. Nelson is licensed as a Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) in the State of Arkansas. Mr. Nelson’s 35-year career as a CPA, his academic expertise, and his experience on our Board qualifies him to serve on the Board and its Audit Committee. His broad experience uniquely qualifies Mr. Nelson as an SEC Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Emily L. Pataki. Ms. Pataki has been serving on the Board since November 12, 2021. Since 2016, Ms. Pataki has been self-employed as a consultant assisting clients with aerospace, defense and corporate strategy. Since 2014, she has also served on the Board of Directors and in various officer roles at Pedernales Electric Cooperative, an energy utility cooperative in Texas, and on the Board of Directors of Atec, Inc. an aerospace firm also located in Texas. The Company believes Ms. Pataki’s corporate and consulting experience and knowledge of the energy industry are an asset to the Board.


Henry Nisser. Mr. Nisser has served as a member of our Board since March 7, 2023, upon which date he also became our President and General Counsel. Mr. Nisser has served as a member of the Board of Ault Alliance, Inc. (“AAI”) since September 17, 2020 and he was appointed as its Executive Vice President and General counsel on May 1, 2019. On January 19, 2021, Mr. Nisser resigned as Executive Vice President and was appointed as AAI’s President. Mr. Nisser has served on the board of directors of SMC, a Nasdaq listed company that is the worldwide leader in consumer karaoke products, since April 2023. Mr. Nisser is the Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Avalanche International, Corp., a “voluntary filer” under the Exchange Act. Mr. Nisser has served as the President, General Counsel and on the board of directors of ADTC, an NYSE listed SPAC, since its incorporation in February 2021. Mr. Nisser has served on the board of directors of Alzamend Neuro, Inc., a biotechnology firm dedicated to finding the treatment, prevention and cure for Alzheimer’s Disease, since September 1, 2020 and has served as its Executive Vice President and General Counsel since May 1, 2019. From October 31, 2011 through April 26, 2019, Mr. Nisser was an associate and subsequently a partner with Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP (“SRF”), a law firm based in New York City. While with SRF, his practice was concentrated in national and international corporate law, with a particular focus on U.S. securities compliance, public as well as private M&A, equity and debt financings and corporate governance. Mr. Nisser drafted and negotiated a variety of agreements related to reorganizations, share and asset purchases, indentures, public and private offerings, tender offers and going private transactions. Mr. Nisser also represented clients’ special committees established to evaluate M&A transactions and advised such committees’ members with respect to their fiduciary duties. Mr. Nisser is fluent in French and Swedish as well as conversant in Italian. Mr. Nisser received his B.A. from Connecticut College in 1992, where he majored in International Relations and Economics. He received his LLB from the University of Buckingham School of Law in 1999. We believe that Mr. Nisser’s extensive legal experience involving complex transactions and comprehensive knowledge of securities laws and corporate governance requirements applicable to listed companies give him the qualifications and skills to serve as one of our directors.

Set forth below is biographical information with respect to each current executive officer of the Company. Messrs. May and Nisser also serve as directors of the Company. Officers are elected by the Board to hold office until their successors are elected and qualified.

Name

AgePositions Held with the Company
Randy S. May59Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Jay Puchir47Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer of the Company
Jimmy R. Galla56Chief Accounting Officer of the Company
Henry Nisser54President and General Counsel of the Company

Randy S. May. See “Directors” above for Mr. May’s biographical information.

Jay Puchir. Mr. Puchir has served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since April 12, 2022, and Secretary / Treasurer of the Company since October 22, 2020. Mr. Puchir has also served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Banner Midstream Corp. since its formation in April 2018 through its divestiture by the Company in August 2022. Mr. Puchir also serves as the Chief Financial Officer of White River Energy Corp. He previously was Chief Financial Officer of Agora from September 2021 to April 2022.  Mr. Puchir served in various roles as an executive at the Company including Director of Finance from December 2016 to March 2017, Chief Executive Officer from March 2017 to October 2017, Chief Financial Officer from October 2017 to May 2018 and Chief Accounting Officer from March 2020 to October 2020.  He served as Chief Executive Officer of Banner Energy Services Corp. from November 2019 to August 2020 and as Chairman from February 2020 to August 2020. Mr. Puchir is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State of South Carolina.

Jimmy R. Galla. Mr. Galla has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since October 22, 2020. He had previously served as the Company’s Director of Financial Reporting since July 20, 2020, and prior to that he served as an accounting consultant to the Company from January 2017 to March 2020. From October 2017 to July 2020, Mr. Galla served as VP, Financial Accounting Lead Analyst, Deputy Controller Department of Citibank, Inc.

Henry Nisser. See “Directors” above for Mr. Nisser’s biographical information.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers.

Corporate Governance

Board Committees and Charters

The Board and its committees meet and act by written consent from time to time as appropriate. The Board has formed the following standing committees: (i) the Audit Committee, (ii) the Compensation Committee, and (iii) the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee (the “Nominating Committee”). These Committees regularly report on their activities and actions to the Board.

Each of our Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance & Nominating Committees has a written charter. Each of these committee charters is available through the “Investor Relations” section on our website, which can be found at www.ecoarkusa.com. The information on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement.


Director Independence

Our Board, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, has determined that each of the Company’s three non-employee directors qualifies as an independent director pursuant to Rule 5605(a)(2) of Nasdaq Listing Rules and applicable SEC rules and regulations.

Our Board has also determined that Mr. Gary Metzger, Mr. Steven K. Nelson and Ms. Emily L. Pataki meet the independence requirements under Rule 5605(c)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules and the heightened independence requirements for Audit Committee members under Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Also, our Board has determined that Mr. Gary Metzger, Mr. Steven K. Nelson and Ms. Emily L. Pataki are independent under Rule 5605(a) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules independence standards for Compensation Committee members.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The following is an overview of each of the Audit Committee, Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee and Compensation Committee of our Board. Each such committee operates under a written charter; copies of which available on our website at https://www.ecoarkusa.com/investor-relations/.

Audit Committee

Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board and administers our engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, the evaluations of our internal controls, and the overall quality of our financial reporting. The Audit Committee also has responsibility for approving related party transactions.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our Board has determined that Mr. Steven K. Nelson is qualified as an Audit Committee Financial Expert, as that term is defined under the rules of the SEC and in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee (“Nominating Committee”)

The responsibilities of the Nominating Committee include the identification of individuals qualified to become Board members, the selection of nominees to stand for election as directors, the oversight of the selection and composition of committees of the Board, establishing procedures for the nomination process including procedures, oversight of possible conflicts of interests involving the Board and its members, developing corporate governance principles, and the oversight of the evaluations of the Board and management. The Nominating Committee has not established a policy with regard to the consideration of any candidates recommended by stockholders. If we receive any stockholder recommended nominations, the Nominating Committee will carefully review the recommendation(s) and consider such recommendation(s) in good faith.

Compensation Committee

The function of the Compensation Committee is to determine the compensation of our executive officers and other compensation matters, including the periodic review of the compensation strategy of the Company in consultation with the chief executive officer and its effect on the achievement of Company goals. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is responsible for administering the Company’s executive and equity compensation plans, including the 2013 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan, and such other compensation and benefit plans, as it deems appropriate, subject to the Board’s authority to also appoint other committees to administer awards made to non-executive officers.

Board Diversity

While we do not have a formal policy on diversity, our Board and Nominating Committee consider diversity to include the skill set, background, reputation, type and length of business experience of our Board members as well as a particular nominee’s contribution to that mix. Of our five directors, one is female. Although there are many other factors, our Board seeks individuals with experience in the oil and gas industry or in other industries in which we operate or legal and accounting skills.


Board Leadership Structure

Our Board has determined that its current structure, with a combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles, is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders at this time. A number of factors support the leadership structure chosen by the Board, including, among others:

The Chief Executive Officer is intimately involved in the day-to-day operations of the Company and is best positioned to elevate the most critical business issues for consideration by the Board.

The Board believes that having the Chief Executive Officer serve in both capacities allows him to more effectively execute the Company’s strategic initiatives and business plans and confront its challenges. A combined Chairman and Chief Executive Officer structure provides us with decisive and effective leadership with clearer accountability to our stockholders. The combined role is both counterbalanced and enhanced by the effective oversight and independence of our Board. The Board believes that the use of regular executive sessions of the non-management directors allows it to maintain effective oversight of management.

Our Bylaws provide that the Chairman of the Board may be elected by a majority vote of the Board of Directors and shall serve until the meeting of the Board following the next annual meeting of stockholders at which such Chairman is re-elected. The Chairman of the Board shall preside at all meetings.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) provide that a Lead Director selected by the non-management directors shall preside at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present. The Guidelines require that the Lead Director shall preside at executive sessions of the non-management directors. The non-management directors will meet in executive session, no less frequently than quarterly, as determined by the Lead Director, or when a director makes a request of the Lead Director. Steven K. Nelson currently serves as the Lead Director. The Lead Director serves as the Company’s lead independent director.

Board Risk Oversight

Our risk management function is overseen by our Board. Our management keeps its Board apprised of material risks and provides its directors access to all information necessary for them to understand and evaluate how these risks interrelate, how they affect us, and how management addresses those risks. Mr. Randy S. May, as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, works closely with the Board once material risks are identified on how to best address such risks. If the identified risk poses an actual or potential conflict with management, our independent directors may conduct the assessment.

The Board actively interfaces with management on seeking solutions to any perceived risk.

Stockholder Communications

Although we do not have a formal policy regarding communications with our Board, stockholders may communicate with the Board by writing to the Corporate Secretary of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. at 303 Pearl Parkway Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 78215. Stockholders who would like their submission directed to a particular member of the Board may so specify, and the communication will be forwarded, as appropriate.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our Common Stock to file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our Common Stock and other equity securities with the SEC. These individuals are required by the regulations of the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of the forms furnished to us, and written representations from reporting persons, we believe that all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners were complied with during our fiscal year ended March 31, 2023.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics as defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K, which code applies to all of our directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. All directors, officers, and other employees are expected to be familiar with the Code of Ethics and to adhere to the principles and procedures set forth therein. The Code of Ethics forms the foundation of a comprehensive program that requires compliance with all corporate policies and procedures and seeks to foster an open relationship among colleagues that contributes to good business conduct and an abiding belief in the integrity of our employees. Our policies and procedures cover all areas of professional conduct, including employment policies, conflicts of interest, intellectual property, and the protection of confidential information, as well as strict adherence to all laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business.


Directors, officers, and other employees are required to report any conduct that they believe in good faith to be an actual or apparent violation of the Code of Ethics. The full text of the Code of Ethics is available on our website at https://www.ecoarkusa.com/company/governance. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, any provision of our Code of Ethics by posting such amendment or waiver on our website.

Hedging

Under the Company’s Insider Trading Policy, all officers, directors and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Except as set forth below, to the best of our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director, executive officer, or employee:

been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;

been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity;

or been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our named executive officers during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

Name and Principal Position Fiscal Year Salary ($)(1)  Stock Awards ($)(2)  Total ($) 
Randy S. May (3) 2023  400,000   0   400,000 
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company; Executive Chairman of Agora 2022  333,333       333,333 
               
Jay Puchir (4) 2023  270,000   0   270,000 
Chief Financial Officer of the Company 2022  238,333   625,000   863,333 
               
Jimmy R. Galla (5) 2023  160,000   0   160,000 
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company 2022  160,000   0   160,000 

(1)We periodically review, and may increase, base salaries in accordance with the Company’s normal annual compensation review for each of our Named Executive Officers.
(2)Amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted without regards to forfeitures during the applicable fiscal year, computed in accordance with ASC 718. This amount does not reflect the actual economic value realized by the recipient. See the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements of the Company contained in Item 8 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2022 Fiscal Year for information regarding the assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards.
(3)Mr. May is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and has been Executive Chairman of Agora since September 2021. The amounts are itemized as follows: (a) for salary, consists of $400,000 paid or incurred by Ecoark Holdings; and (b) for Stock Awards, consists of an award of Agora restricted stock granted by Agora.
(4)Mr. Puchir has served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since April 12, 2022 and served as the Chief Financial Officer of Agora until April 12, 2022. The amounts are itemized as follows: (a) for salary, consists of $270,000 paid or incurred by Ecoark Holdings; and (b) for Stock Awards, consists of an award of Agora restricted stock granted by Agora.
(5)Mr. Galla has served as the Chief Accounting Officer of the Company since October 2020 and served as the Company’s Director of Financial Reporting from July 2020 to October 2020.

Named Executive Officer Employment Agreements

Set forth below are summaries of our Employment Agreements with each Named Executive Officer.

Ecoark Holdings Employment Agreements

Randy S. May

Mr. May receives an annual salary of $400,000 pursuant to an oral Employment Agreement.

Jay Puchir

Mr. Puchir entered into a three-year Employment Agreement with Banner Midstream which expired in March 2023. Mr. Puchir is currently working day-to-day under the same terms as his previously expired agreement at the pleasure of the Company’s CEO and Board of Directors with no commitment for future periods. He receives an annual base salary of $280,000 which was increased by the Board from the initial base salary of $180,000. Under his Employment Agreement, Mr. Puchir also received 50,000 stock options and is entitled to receive an annual bonus of up to 30% of his annual base salary based on based on performance criteria established by the Board. Mr. Puchir is currently being paid via an oral Employment Agreement under the previous terms of his Agreement which expired in March 2023.

Pursuant to Mr. Puchir’s Employment Agreement, in the event of termination by the Company without “cause,” or resignation for “good reason,” Mr. Puchir is entitled to receive an amount of base salary for the longer of (i) the remainder of the applicable term, and (ii) three months, and a lump sum cash payment equal to six times the “applicable percentage” of his monthly COBRA premium cost.

Generally, “good reason” is defined as (i) a material reduction of Mr. Puchir’s annual base salary (which must be by at least 20% in order to constitute a material reduction), or (ii) a material breach of the terms of the Employment Agreement by the Company.


Jimmy R. Galla

Mr. Galla entered into a four-year Employment Agreement with the Company which expires in June 2024.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table presents information concerning equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of March 31, 2023:

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
  Option Awards
Name Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
            
Randy S. May  1,667      136.50  12/31/2029
Jay Puchir  1,333      94.50  5/5/2029
   1,667      78.00  3/27/2029
Jim Galla  100      510.00  6/20/2030

Director Compensation Table

Directors may receive compensation for their services and reimbursement for their expenses as shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board. Beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2021, directors began receiving quarterly cash payments of $12,500 and RSU grants with a value of $12,500 based on the closing price of our Common Stock on each applicable grant date. Additional cash and RSU grants are granted for servings the chair of a Board committee.

The following table sets forth the compensation earned to our non-employee directors for service during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023.

Name Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(1)
  Total
($)
 
             
Gary Metzger $60,000   50,000   --   110,000 
Steven K. Nelson $70,000   50,000   --   120,000 
Emily L. Pataki $60,000   50,000   --   110,000 

(1)Amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted without regards to forfeitures granted to the non-employee members of our Board during the 2022 fiscal year, computed in accordance with ASC 718. This amount does not reflect the actual economic value realized by each director. The Company accrued equity awards issuable to its independent Directors in FY 2023 but did not issue any awards during the year.

The table below sets forth the shares of unexercised options held by each of our non-employee directors outstanding as of March 31, 2023.

NameAggregate
Number of
Option
Awards
Outstanding
at
March 31,
2023
Gary Metzger4,023
Steven K. Nelson4,023
Emily L. Pataki 


 

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock beneficially owned as of the Record Date by (i) those persons known by the Company to be owners of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each director, (iii) each Named Executive Officer (as such term is defined in Item 402(m)(2) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act), and (iv) the Company’s current executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise specified in the notes to the below table, the address for each person is: c/o Ecoark Holdings, Inc., 303 Pearl Parkway Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 78215, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Beneficial Owner Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership (1)
  Percent Beneficially Owned (1) 
       
Randy S. May (2)  19,833   * 
Gary Metzger (3)  36,281   1.4%
Steven K. Nelson (4)  4,261   * 
Emily L. Pataki (5)  667   * 
Jay Puchir (6)  21,264   * 
Jimmy R. Galla (7)  100   * 
Henry Nisser  0   - - - 
All directors and all executive officers as a group (7 persons) (8)  96,733   3.8%
Ault Alliance, Inc. (9)  311,930   12.4%

*Less than 1%.

(1)Applicable percentages are based on 2,522,816 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date. Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within 60 days whether upon the exercise of options, warrants or conversion of convertible notes. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, the Company believes that each of the stockholders named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by them. This table does not include any unvested stock options except for those vesting within 60 days.
(2)Mr. May is our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Includes 1,667 vested stock options.
(3)Mr. Metzger is a director. Includes 6,667 shares held by Gary Metzger Irrevocable Trust and 4,023 vested stock options.
(4)Mr. Nelson is a director. Includes 4,023 vested stock options.
(5)Ms. Pataki is a director. Represents 667 shares held by Theodore R. Pataki & Emily Lederer Pataki JT TEN.
(6)Mr. Puchir is our Chief Financial Officer. Includes 1,667 vested stock options and 18,264 shares of Common Stock and 1,333 vested stock options held by Atikin Investments LLC, an entity managed by Mr. Puchir.
(7)Mr. Galla is our Chief Accounting Officer.  Includes 100 vested stock options.
(8)This amount represents beneficial ownership by all directors and all current executive officers of the Company including those who are not Named Executive Officers under the SEC’s disclosure rules. Includes 13,289 vested stock options.
(9)The address is 11411 Southern Highlands Parkway, Suite 240, Las Vegas, NV 89141.  Based solely on the information contained in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on March 6, 2023.


Equity Compensation Information

The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans as of March 31, 2023.

        Number of securities
  Number of securities  Weighted-  remaining available for
  to be issued  average  future issuance under
  upon exercise  exercise price  equity compensation plans
  of outstanding options,  of outstanding options,  (excluding securities
  warrants and rights  warrants and rights  reflected in column (a))
Plan Category (a)  (b)  (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders        
2003 Incentive Stock Plan  2,250  $390.00  13,167
2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan  12,449  $229.50  4,896
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders (1)  28,471  $164.10   
Total  43,170  $194.73  490,614

(1)Represents non-qualified stock options not granted under any existing equity compensation plans.


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Set forth below is the description of transactions since April 1, 2021, to which the Company has been a party in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000 and in which any of our directors, executive officers, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our Common Stock and certain other related persons had a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation arrangements described in this Proxy Statement under “Executive Compensation” or “Director Compensation.”

On August 5, 2021, the Company granted Peter Mehring, then a director of the Company and Chief Executive Officer and President of Zest Labs, Inc., 9,075 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) in exchange for cancellation of 22,417 previously issued stock options, of which 3,362 remained unvested. The RSUs were granted under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”). Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of the Company’s Common Stock. The grant of the RSUs and the cancellation of the Options were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board. The RSUs vest in 12 equal quarterly increments with the first vesting date being November 4, 2021. Additionally, in October 2021 following stockholder approval of an amendment to the 2017 Plan, the Company granted Mr. Mehring an additional 2,133 RSUs having the same terms as those described above.

On February 2, 2022, Peter Mehring gave notice of his intent to resign as an executive officer and director effective on February 11, 2022. Mr. Mehring resigned as a result of his entering into an Employment Agreement with a leading Internet service company. He also entered into a Consulting Agreement with the Company under which Mr. Mehring advises Zest Labs, Inc. on matters relating to Zest Lab, Inc.’s intellectual property and litigation as well as provide transition services. The Consulting Agreement has a one-year term, during which time the Company agreed to pay Mr. Mehring $16,667 per month and for his unvested stock awards to continue to vest during the term, and that the expiration date on any stock awards be extended to February 14, 2023.

In the year ended March 31, 2023, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Randy May, and Chief Financial Officer, Jay Puchir, advanced a total of $961,000 of which was repaid. These were short-term advances and no interest was charged as the amounts were outstanding for just a few weeks.

The Company made periodic loans to Agora to permit it to begin its Bitcoin mining business. On November 13, 2021, Agora issued the Company a $7.5 million term note which accrues 10% per annum interest and was due March 31, 2023. The line of credit was established prior to the pending spin-out of Agora. Now that Agora will remain in BitNile Metaverse, this term note has been cancelled (effective March 31, 2023), and the amounts due from Agora are considered intercompany advances and are eliminated in the consolidation.

In the acquisition of Bitnile.com, the Company assumed $4,404,350 in advances to the former parent of Bitnile.com. In the period March 6, 2023 through March 31, 2023, an additional $1,378,294 was advanced to Bitnile.com and $5,782,644 remains outstanding at March 31, 2023.


Director Independence

The following table identifies the independent and non-independent Board nominees and Committee members:

Name

IndependentAuditCompensationCorporate
Governance &
Nominating
Randy S. May
Gary M. Metzger××Chair×
Steven K. Nelson×Chair××
Emily L. Pataki×××Chair
Henry Nisser

All of the directors except for Mr. Nisser attended over 75% of the applicable Board and Committee meetings held during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 (the “2023 Fiscal Year”); Mr. Nisser joined the Board of Directors in March 2023 and was not eligible to attend meetings prior to that date.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following table shows the fees paid to RBSM for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

  Year Ended
March 31,
2023
($)
  Year Ended
March 31,
2022
($)
 
Audit Fees (1) $390,000  $381,303 
Audit Related Fees      
Tax Fees(2)  50,000   50,000 
All Other Fees      
Total $440,000  $431,303 

(1)Audit fees consist of fees incurred in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of the interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports filed with the SEC. Audit fees also relate to the audit and review of Agora’s financial statements contained in registration statements, including a total of $60,000 in fees for Agora’s registration statement in connection with its initial public offering in 2022 and $50,000 for a S-3 registration statement in 2023, and $60,000 each for audits related to White River Holdings Corp and Banner Midstream Corp. related to their reverse merger transactions.

(2)Tax fees consist of fees incurred in connection with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number
Description
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company and Trend Holdings, dated May 31, 2019. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2019 as Exhibit 2.1 thereto.
2.2Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated March 27, 2020, by and between the Company and Banner Energy Services Corp. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 2, 2020 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
2.3+Asset Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, White River E&P LLC, Rabb Resources, Ltd. and Claude Rabb, dated August 14, 2020. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2020 as Exhibit 2.1 thereto.
3.1Articles of Incorporation, dated November 20, 2007, as amended. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 12, 2021 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws effective as of April 24, 2017. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.
3.3Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated October 8, 2021. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 20, 2020 as Exhibit 2.1 thereto.
3.4First Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2021 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.
3.5Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2022 as Exhibit 3.2 thereto.
3.6Certificate of Designation for Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock dated June 8, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2022 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.
3.7Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation for the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, dated June 22, 2022.  Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 22, 2022 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.
3.8Form of HUMBL Series C Certificate of Designation, dated August 11, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 16, 2022 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
3.9Second Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation for the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, dated July 14, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2022 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.
3.10Form of Fortium Series A Certificate of Designation, dated July 22, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2022 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
3.11Third Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation for the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, dated November 28, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2022 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.


3.12Form of Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, dated March 6, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2023 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
3.13Form of Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, dated March 6, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2023 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
3.14Form of Certificate of Amendment to the Form of Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, dated March 7, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2023 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
3.15Form of Certificate of Amendment to the Form of Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, dated March 7, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2023 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
3.16Articles of Merger, dated March 17, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 21, 2023 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.
3.17Certificate of Change, dated May 4, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 10, 2024 as Exhibit 3.1 thereto.
3.18Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Limitations of Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, dated May 9, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 10, 2024 as Exhibit 3.2 thereto.
4.1Form of Placement Agent Warrant, dated August 6, 2021. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2021 as Exhibit 4.2 thereto.
4.2Form of Warrant. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2021 as Exhibit 4.1 thereto.
4.3Form of Warrant, dated June 8, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2022 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
4.4Form of Amended and Restated Warrant, dated June 8, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2022 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
4.5Form of Note, dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 4.1 thereto.
4.6Form of Warrant, dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 4.2 thereto.
4.7**Description of Capital Stock.
10.1*Magnolia Solar Corporation 2013 Incentive Stock Plan. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on February 7, 2013 as Exhibit 4.1 thereto.
10.2*Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective June 13, 2017. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s  Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 14, 2017 as Exhibit 99.1 thereto.
10.3*Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. 2021 Stock Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2017 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
10.4*Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 20, 2017 as Exhibit 10.3 thereto.
10.5*Employment Agreement, dated March 27, 2020, by and between Banner Midstream Corp and Jay Puchir. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 10-K filed on June 30, 2021 as Exhibit 10.9 thereto.
10.6Agreement and Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease dated September 3, 2020. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 12, 2021 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.7Agreement and Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease, dated October 9, 2020. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on February 12, 2021 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.


10.8*Amendment to the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on August 26, 2021 as Appendix B thereto.
10.9Engagement Agreement, dated July 30, 2021. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2021 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
10.10Amendment to Engagement Agreement, dated July 30, 2021. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2022 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
10.11+Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 4, 2021. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2021 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.12+Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated August 5, 2021, between the Company and Peter Mehring. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 11, 2021 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.13+Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated October 6, 2021, between the Company and Peter Mehring. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 12, 2021 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.14Peter Mehring Consulting Agreement, dated February 14, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2022 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.15+Form of Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated June 16, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 21, 2022 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.16Form of Secured Promissory Note, dated June 16, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 21, 2022 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
10.17+Form of Guaranty Agreement dated June 16, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 21, 2022 as Exhibit 10.4 thereto.
10.18Form of Security Agreement dated June 16, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 21, 2022 as Exhibit 10.3 thereto.
10.19+Form of Share Exchange Agreement dated July 22, 2022.Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2022 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.20+Form of Fortium Share Exchange Agreement dated July 22, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2022 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
10.21+Share Exchange Agreement dated August 23, 2022 by and among Enviro Technologies U.S., Inc., Banner Midstream Corp. and Ecoark Holdings, Inc. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 26, 2022 as Exhibit 2.1 thereto.
10.22+Agreement between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Ault Lending, LLC dated November 22, 2022. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2022 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.23+At-The-Market Issuance Sales Agreement dated January 24, 2023 between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Ascendiant Capital Markets, LLC dated January 24, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2023 as Exhibit 1.1 thereto.
10.24+Form of Share Exchange Agreement dated February 8, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2023 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.25+Form of Amendment to Share Exchange Agreement dated February 8, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2023 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.26+Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated February 8, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 14, 2023 as Exhibit 10.4 thereto.
10.27Letter Agreement dated April 4, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6, 2023 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.28Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.
10.29Form of Registration Rights Agreement dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 10.3 thereto.
10.30Form of AAI Guaranty dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 10.4 thereto.
10.31Form of Subsidiary Guaranty dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 10.5 thereto.
10.32Form of Voting Agreement dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 10.6 thereto.
10.33Form of Lockup Agreement dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 10.7 thereto.
10.34Form of Security Agreement dated April 27, 2023. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2023 as Exhibit 10.2 thereto.
10.35+Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2023, between BitNile Metaverse, Inc. and Arena Business Results, LLC. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2023 as Exhibit 10.1 thereto.


14.1Code of Ethics. Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2021 as Exhibit 14.1 thereto
21.1**List of Subsidiaries.
23.1**Consent of  RBSM LLP.
31.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
31.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
32.1***Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
101.INS**Inline XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH**Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL**Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF**Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB**Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE**Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**Filed herewith.
***Furnished herewith.
+Certain information in this document has been excluded pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(10). Such excluded information is not material and is the type that the registrant treats as private or confidential. A copy of omitted information will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request; provided, however, that the parties may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any document so furnished.

ITEM 16. FORM 10–K SUMMARY

None.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: July 14, 2023

BITNILE METAVERSE, INC.
By:/s/ Randy S. May
Randy S. May
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Jay Puchir
Jay Puchir
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.

July 14, 2023/s/ Randy S. May

Randy S. May, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

July 14, 2023/s/ Jay Puchir

Jay Puchir, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

July 14, 2023

Jim Galla, Chief Accounting Officer

(Principal Accounting Officer)

July 14, 2023/s/ Henry Nisser
Henry Nisser, President, General Counsel and
Director
July 14, 2023/s/ Steven K. Nelson
Steven K. Nelson, Director
July 14, 2023/s/ Gary Metzger
Gary Metzger, Director
July 14, 2023/s/ Emily Pataki
Emily Pataki, Director


FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

BitNile Metaverse, Inc. and

Stockholders of subsidiaries (formerly Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries)

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of BitNile Metaverse, Inc. and subsidiaries (formerly Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries) (the “Company”) as of DecemberMarch 31, 20162023 and 2015,2022, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standardseach of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plantwo years in the period ended March 31, 2023, and perform the auditrelated notes (collectively referred to obtain reasonable assurance about whetheras the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes, examining, on a test, basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiariesthe Company as of DecemberMarch 31, 20162023 and 2015,2022, and the results of its consolidated operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016 and 2015,2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Substantial doubt about the Company's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying combined consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred substantialsuffered recurring losses from operations and needs to obtain additional financing to continue the development of their products. The lack of profitable operations raisehad an accumulated deficit that raises substantial doubt about the Company’sits ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in this regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The combined consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We also have audited,conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PublicPCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries’is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, asbut not for the purpose of December 31, 2016, basedexpressing an opinion on criteria established inInternal Control— Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizationseffectiveness of the Treadway Commission (COSO),Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our report dated March 15, 2017, expressed an unqualifiedaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

KBL, LLP
/s/ KBL, LLP
New York, NY
March 15, 2017

Critical Audit Matters

 

Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

F-1

 

 

Valuation of Investment in White River Energy Corp

Critical Audit Matter Description

As described in Note 6 to the financial statements, the Company has $30 million as Investment in White River Energy Corp. arising from a share exchange agreement pursuant to which it sold its oil and gas business in July 2022 and the investment is classified as a current asset on the balance sheet. Management fair values investment at each reporting date and as a result, determined loss on the value using the lower of cost or market value principal. We determined the fair value of investment as a critical audit matter as it involved high level of management judgment and in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, effort and subjectivity in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to management’s valuation methods and significant assumptions. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professional with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

How the Critical Audit Matter was addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the Company’s assertion on the fair value of investment included the following, among others -

We utilized personnel with specialized knowledge and skill in valuation to assist in; a) assessing the appropriateness and relative valuation methodology, b) evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions and estimates used in the option pricing method approach,

Evaluate the reasonableness of management’s significant estimates and assumptions including discount rates, weighted average cost of capital and futures market conditions.

Evaluate if there have been events and circumstances that might indicate that the Investment has been impaired.

Valuation of Series B and C Preferred Stock issued to Ault Lending Inc.–

Critical Audit Matter Description

As described in Note 3 and Note 17 to the financial statements, the Company acquired the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Bitnile.com pursuant to a share exchange agreement by issuance of Series B and C preferred stock. The management determined the preferred shares constituted a derivative liability at inception and remeasured at the reporting date. We have identified the valuation of Series B and C Preferred Stock as a critical audit matter as (i) there was a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity involved in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to the transaction in its entirety based on the judgment and understanding by management when developing the estimates, (ii) significant audit effort was necessary to evaluate management’s anticipated and significant assumptions. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professional with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.

How the Critical Audit Matter was addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the Company’s assertion on the fair value of preferred stocks included the following, among others -

We utilized personnel with specialized knowledge and skill in valuation to assist in; a) assessing the appropriateness and relative weighting of valuation methodology, b) evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions and estimates used in the methods applied,

Evaluate the reasonableness of management’s significant estimates and assumptions including discount rates, future cash flows and futures market conditions.

/s/ RBSM LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.

PCAOB ID 587

New York, New York

July 14, 2023


BITNILE METAVERSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

MARCH 31, 2023 AND 2022

 

  (Dollars in thousands,
except per share data)
 
  December 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
       
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash $1,495  $1,962 
Certificates of deposit (pledged as collateral for lines of credit)  2,008   - 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $139 and $2 as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively  2,580   972 
Inventory, net of reserves  2,053   743 
Prepaid expenses  296   161 
Assets held for sale  203   - 
Other current assets  19   130 
Total current assets  8,654   3,968 
NON-CURRENT ASSETS        
Property and equipment, net  2,942   363 
Intangible assets, net  1,647   852 
Other assets  55   25 
Total non-current assets  4,644   1,240 
TOTAL ASSETS $13,298  $5,208 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable $2,135  $1,074 
Accrued liabilities  3,364   543 
Note payable  1,500   - 
Current portion of long-term debt  185   3,175 
Debt - related parties  -   1,329 
Total current liabilities  7,184   6,121 
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Long-term debt, net of current portion  642   - 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES  -   - 
Total liabilities  7,826   6,121 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Numbers of shares rounded to thousands)        
         
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; none issued  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 38,303 and 27,706 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively  38   28 
Additional paid-in-capital  67,370   35,796 
Subscription receivable  -   (55)
Accumulated deficit  (61,936)  (36,587)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) before non-controlling interest  5,472   (818)
Non-controlling interest  -   (95)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  5,472   (913)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $13,298  $5,208 
  MARCH 31,  MARCH 31, 
  2023  2022 
ASSETS      
       
CURRENT ASSETS:      
      
Cash ($16,000 pledged as collateral for credit as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively) $66,844  $85,073 
Investment - White River Energy Corp.  9,224,785   - 
Intangible assets, cryptocurrencies  -   19,267 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, current portion  1,215,065   862,944 
Current assets of discontinued operations/held for sale  1,297,801   2,412,842 
         
Total current assets  11,804,495   3,380,126 
         
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:        
Property and equipment, net  4,432,403   7,226,370 
Intangible assets, net  6,204,339   - 
Power development costs  -   2,000,000 
Right of use assets - operating leases  339,304   461,138 
Other assets  10,905   11,189 
Non-current assets of discontinued operations/held for sale  984,071   22,898,420 
         
Total non-current assets  11,971,022   32,597,117 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $23,775,517  $35,977,243 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
LIABILITIES        
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable $6,225,887  $2,723,865 
Accrued liabilities  1,643,494   668,659 
Warrant derivative liabilities  6,264   4,318,630 
Preferred stock derivative liability, net  19,855,962   - 
Current portion of long-term debt  323,818   608,377 
Advances - former parent of Bitnile.com  5,782,643   - 
Current portion of lease liability - operating leases  110,120   117,451 
Current liabilities of discontinued operations/held for sale  2,952,257   3,337,994 
         
Total current liabilities  36,900,445   11,774,976 
         
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Lease liability - operating leases, net of current portion  235,856   345,976 
Long-term debt, net of current portion  205,554   67,802 
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations/held for sale  377,786   1,653,901 
         
Total non-current liabilities  819,196   2,067,679 
         
Total Liabilities  37,719,641   13,842,655 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized        
Series A Preferred stock, 882 and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively  -   - 
Series B Preferred stock, 8,637.5 and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively  -   - 
Series C Preferred stock, 1,362.5 and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 3,333,333 shares authorized, 1,383,832 and 878,803 shares issued and 1,383,832 and 874,899 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively  1,384   879 
Additional paid in capital  199,062,577   183,271,546 
Accumulated deficit  (208,677,438)  (158,868,204)
Treasury stock, at cost  -   (1,670,575)
         
Total stockholders' equity before non-controlling interest  (9,613,477)  22,733,646 
Non-controlling interest  (4,330,647)  (599,058)
         
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)  (13,944,124)  22,134,588 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) $23,775,517  $35,977,243 

 


BITNILE METAVERSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2023 AND 2022

  MARCH 31, 
  2023  2022 
CONTINUING OPERATIONS:      
REVENUES $-  $27,182 
COST OF REVENUES  263,954   183,590 
GROSS PROFIT  (263,954)  (156,408)
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Salaries and salaries related costs  12,105,003   9,092,412 
Professional and consulting fees  1,644,927   1,029,898 
Selling, general and administrative costs  8,030,817   5,394,363 
Bad debt  4,418,229   - 
Depreciation, amortization, and impairment  1,773,120   347,306 
Cryptocurrency impairment losses  9,122   7,229 
         
Total operating expenses  27,981,218   15,871,208 
        
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)  (28,245,172)  (16,027,616)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities  4,312,366   15,386,301 
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liabilities  28,611,760   - 
Change in fair value of investment in White River Energy Corp  (20,775,215)  - 
Derivative income (expense)  14,365,276   - 
Loss on conversion of derivative liability to common stock in conversion of preferred stock  (3,923)  - 
Loss on conversion of derivative liability in redemption of preferred stock  -   - 
Loss on acquisition of Bitnile.com  (54,484,279)    
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets  (570,772)  - 
Interest expense, net of interest income  (744,895)  (580,919)
Total other income (expense)  (29,289,682)  14,805,382 
        
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS  (57,534,854)  (1,222,234)
         
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:        
(Loss) income from discontinued operations  (18,003,354)  (9,332,218)
(Loss) on disposal of discontinued operations  (11,823,395)  - 
Total discontinued operations  (29,826,749)  (9,332,218)
         
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (87,361,603)  (10,554,452)
         
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  -   - 
         
NET LOSS  (87,361,603)  (10,554,452)
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST  5,734,800   629,058 
         
NET LOSS TO CONTROLLING INTEREST $(81,626,803) $(9,925,394)
Less: Preferred Stock Dividends  484,213   - 
         
NET LOSS TO CONTROLLING INTEREST OF COMMON STOCKHOLDERS $(82,111,016) $(9,925,394)
         
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED        
Continuing operations $(53.62) $(0.71)
Discontinued operations  (30.59)  (11.14)
 
 $(84.21) $(11.85)
         
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED  975,063   837,713 


BITNILE METAVERSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2023 AND 2022

           Additional        Non-    
  Preferred  Common Stock  Paid-In  Accumulated  Treasury  controlling    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Stock  Interest  Total 
                            
Balance - March 31, 2021        -  $           -   756,859  $757  $167,609,607  $(148,912,810) $(1,670,575) $-  $17,026,979 
                                     
Shares issued in the exercise of stock options, including cashless exercises  -   -   675   1   28,299   -   -   -   28,300 
Shares issued for services rendered, net of amounts prepaid  -   -   5,327   5   916,346   -   -   -   916,351 
Shares issued in registered direct offering, net of amount allocated to derivative liability  -   -   115,942   116   8,026,963   -   -   -   8,027,079 
Shares issued by Agora Digital Holdings, Inc. for services rendered, net of amounts prepaid  -   -   -   -   4,683,756   -   -   -   4,683,756 
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   -   2,006,575   -   -   -   2,006,575 
Recognition of non-controlling interest  -   -   -   -   -   (30,000)  -   30,000   - 
                                     
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   -   -   (9,925,394)  -   (629,058)  (10,554,452)
                                     
Balance - March 31, 2022  -   -   878,803   879   183,271,546   (158,868,204)  (1,670,575)  (599,058)  22,134,588 
                                     
Shares issued for commitment for preferred stock offering, net of expenses  -   -   3,429   3   193,413   -   -   -   193,416 
Shares issued for cash under ATM, net of fees  -   -   344,050   344   1,715,095   -   -   -   1,715,439 
Shares issued in conversion of preferred stock to common stock  -   -   80,555   81   3,182,312   -   -   -   3,182,393 
Shares issued in settlement  -   -   14,430   14   (625,589)  -   1,670,575   -   1,045,000 
Shares issued for preferred stock dividends  -   -   58,073   58   505,299   -   -   -   505,357 
Shares issued by Agora Digital Holdings, Inc. for services rendered, net of amounts prepaid  -   -   -   -   9,631,406   -   -   -   9,631,406 
Shares issued for vested restricted stock units  -   -   4,492   5   (5)  -   -   -   - 
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   -   1,189,100   -   -   -   1,189,100 
Disposal of subsidiaries in reverse merger transactions  -   -   -   -   -   32,301,782   -   2,003,211   34,304,993 
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   -   -   (81,626,803)  -   (5,734,800)  (87,361,603)
Preferred stock dividends  -   -   -   -   -   (484,213)  -   -   (484,213)
                                     
Balance - March 31, 2023  -  $-   1,383,832  $1,384  $199,062,577  $(208,677,438) $-  $(4,330,647) $(13,944,124)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsstatements.

 

F-2

 

 

BITNILE METAVERSE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

  (Dollars in thousands,
except per share, data)
 
  2016  2015 
REVENUES   
Revenue from product sales $9,482  $5,020 
Revenue from services  4,921   2,656 
   14,403   7,676 
COST OF REVENUES        
Cost of product sales, including $193 of depreciation expense on manufacturing equipment in 2016  10,011   4,999 
Cost of services  1,836   947 
   11,847   5,946 
GROSS PROFIT  2,556   1,730 
OPERATING EXPENSES:        
Salaries and salary related costs, including share-based compensation of $2,011 and $366 in 2016 and 2015, respectively  7,708   3,090 
Professional fees and consulting, including share-based compensation of $4,697 and $894 in 2016 and 2015, respectively  8,559   2,048 
Selling, general and administrative  3,040   2,253 
Depreciation, amortization and impairment  2,120   1,226 
Research and development  5,979   2,801 
Total operating expenses  27,406   11,418 
Loss from operations  (24,850)  (9,688)
         
OTHER EXPENSES:        
Interest expense, net of interest income  (355)  (785)
Loss on retirement of assets  (25)  - 
Total other expenses  (380)  (785)
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (25,230)  (10,473)
         
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  -   - 
NET LOSS  (25,230)  (10,473)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST  119   29 
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST $(25,349) $(10,502)
         
NET LOSS PER SHARE        
Basic $(0.75) $(0.36)
Diluted $(0.75) $(0.36)
         
SHARES USED IN CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE  (Number of shares in thousands) 
Basic  33,827   29,344 
Diluted  37,431   29,395 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

)

F-3

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

(Dollar amounts and number of shares in thousand)               
  Preferred  Common  Additional
Paid-In-
  Subscription  Accumulated  Non-
controlling
    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Receivable  Deficit  Interest  Total 
Balances at January 1, 2015  -  $-   27,643  $28  $18,660  $(31) $(26,085) $(124) $(7,552)
                                     
Re-issuance of treasury shares for cash, net of expenses  -   -   -   -   8,485   (55)  -   -   8,430 
                                     
Shares issued for services rendered  -   -   63   -   894   -   -   -   894 
                                     
Collection of subscription receivable  -   -   -   -   -   31   -   -   31 
                                     
Re-issuance of treasury shares for debt conversion  -   -   -   -   7,391   -   -   -   7,391 
                                     
Share-based compensation – options  -   -   -   -   366   -   -   -   366 
                                     
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   -   -   -   (10,502)  29   (10,473)
                                     
Balances at December 31, 2015  -   -   27,706   28   35,796   (55)  (36,587)  (95)  (913)
                                     
Re-issuance of treasury shares for cash, net of expenses  -   -   -   -   200   -   -   -   200 
                                     
Shares issued for cash in private placement, net of expenses  -   -   4,337   4   17,316   -   -   -   17,320 
                                     
Shares held by Magnolia Solar Corporation at time of merger  -   -   1,351   1   -   -   -   -   1 
                                     
Shares issued in exercise of warrants  -   -   100   -   487   -   -   -   487 
                                     
Cancellation of treasury shares at time of merger  -   -   -   -   58   -   -   -   58 
                                     
Collection of subscription receivable  -   -   -   -   -   55   -   -   55 
                                     
Shares issued for services rendered  -   -   743   1   3,423   -   -   -   3,424 
                                     
Warrants issued for services rendered  -   -   -   -   312   -   -   -   312 
                                     
Share-based compensation – options  -   -   -   -   1,419   -   -   -   1,419 
                                     
Share-based compensation – stock-employees  -   -   32   -   161   -   -   -   161 
                                     
Share-based compensation – stock grants - employees              1,292            1,292 
                                     
Share-based compensation – stock-Board of Directors  -   -   9   -   100   -   -   -   100 
                                     
Shares issued for company acquisition  -   -   2,000   2   3,784   -   -   -   3,786 
                                     
Shares issued in exchange for noncontrolling interest  -   -   525   1   23   -   -   (24)  - 
                                     
Shares issued for conversion of long-term debt  -   -   1,500   1   2,999   -   -   -   3,000 
                                     
Net loss for the period  -   -   -   -   -   -   (25,349)  119  $(25,230)
                                     
Balances at December 31, 2016  -  $-   38,303  $38  $67,370  $-  $(61,936) $-  $5,472 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-4

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBERMARCH 31, 20162023 AND 20152022

 

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2016  2015 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss attributable to controlling interest $(25,349) $(10,502)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Shares of common stock issued for services rendered  3,685   894 
Depreciation, amortization and impairment, including $193 included in cost of product sales in 2016  2,313   1,226 
Share-based compensation - options  1,419   366 
Share-based compensation – stock grants  1,292   - 
Warrants issued for services rendered  312   - 
Loss on retirement of assets  25   - 
Cash acquired in acquisition  41   - 
Cash acquired in merger  17   - 
Change in non-controlling interest on cash  119   29 
Interest reinvested in certificates of deposit  (8)  - 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (358)  (88)
Inventory  (551)  160 
Prepaid expenses  (124)  (10)
Other assets  105   (130)
Accounts payable  281   107 
Accrued liabilities  2,684   277 
Net cash used in operating activities  (14,097)  (7,671)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Purchases of certificates of deposit  (3,500)  - 
Redemption of certificates of deposit  1,500   - 
Purchases of property and equipment  (724)  (60)
Pre-acquisition investment in Sable  (600)  - 
Collection of notes receivable - related party  -   100 
Acquisition of intangible assets  -   (15)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (3,324)  25 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of fees  17,320   31 
Re-issuance of treasury shares for cash, net of expenses  200   8,430 
Collection of subscription receivable  55   - 
Proceeds from line of credit (debt)  500   - 
Repayments of long-term debt  (279)  (273)
Proceeds from issuances of debt - related parties  185   1,875 
Repayments of debt – related parties  (1,514)  (2,675)
Exercise of warrants  487   - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  16,954   7,388 
NET DECREASE IN CASH  (467)  (258)
Cash - beginning of year  1,962   2,220 
Cash - end of year $1,495  $1,962 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:        
Cash paid for interest $413  $551 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 
         
SUMMARY OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:        
Long-term debt converted to common stock $3,000  $- 
Intangibles acquired in merger $77  $- 
Payables assumed in merger $59  $- 
Treasury stock re-purchased for release of guarantee $-  $393 
Treasury stock re-issued for debt conversion - related parties $-  $7,391 
Accrued interest converted into debt - related parties $-  $235 
Assets and liabilities acquired in acquisition of Sable:        
Receivables, net $1,250  $- 
Inventory $759  $- 
Property and equipment $2,822  $- 
Identifiable intangible assets $1,028  $- 
Goodwill $1,264  $- 
Other assets $36  $- 
Payables and liabilities assumed $883  $- 
Debt assumed $2,531  $- 
  MARCH 31, 
  2023  2022 
       
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS      
Net loss $(87,361,603) $(10,554,452)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities        
Change in non-controlling interest  (5,734,800)  (629,058)
Loss on acquisition of Bitnile.com  54,484,279   - 
Depreciation, amortization, and impairment  1,773,120   347,306 
Cryptocurrency impairment losses  9,122   7,228 
Debt modification expense  879,368   - 
Share-based compensation  1,189,100   2,006,575 
Change in fair value of investment in White River Energy Corp  20,775,215   - 
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities  (4,312,366)  (15,386,301)
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liabilities  (28,611,759)  - 
Derivative (income) expense  (14,365,276)  - 
Loss on conversion of derivative liabilities to common stock  3,923   - 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  570,772   - 
Loss on disposal of White River and Pinnacle Frac  12,534,900   - 
(Gain) on disposal of Trend Discovery Holdings  (711,505)  - 
Common shares issued for services  1,045,000   916,351 
Common shares issued for services - Agora  9,631,406   4,683,756 
Amortization of discount  47,515   - 
Development expenses reduced from refund of power development fee  155,292   - 
Impairment of development fee  1,000,000   - 
Bad debt on note receivable  4,418,229   - 
Warrants granted for interest expense  -   545,125 
Warrants granted for commissions  -   744,530 
Commitment fees on long-term debt  17,681   25,855 
Changes in assets and liabilities        
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  268,779   126,605 
Intangible assets - cryptocurrencies  10,145   (26,495)
Amortization of right of use asset - operating leases  121,834   45,472 
Accrued interest receivable  (168,229)  - 
Operating lease expense  (117,451)  (43,183)
Accounts payable  1,189,656   2,203,284 
Accrued liabilities  2,153,754   (1,083,994)
Total adjustments  58,257,704   (5,516,944)
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations  (29,103,899)  (16,071,396)
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations  14,815,722   (1,561,790)
Net cash used in operating activities  (14,288,177)  (17,633,186)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from the sale of power development costs  844,708   (2,000,000)
Purchase of fixed assets  (40,074)  (7,201,446)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations  804,634   (9,201,446)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities of discontinued operations  (681,968)  9,819,090 
Net cash provided by investing activities  122,666   617,644 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock in a registered direct offering, net of fees  -   19,228,948 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  -   28,300 
Proceeds from former parent of Bitnile.com  1,378,294   - 
Proceeds from notes payable - related parties  986,000   - 
Repayments of notes payable - related parties  (986,000)  (327,500)
Proceeds from long-term debt  487,500   570,000 
Repayment of long-term debt  (822,210)  (23,967)
Repayment of obligation to third party to be reflected as future redemptions of Series A Preferred Stock  (635,000)  - 
Proceeds from the sale of common stock under ATM  1,715,439   - 
Proceeds from the sale of preferred stock  12,000,000   - 
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations  14,124,023   19,475,781 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of discontinued operations  23,259   (3,184,977)
Net cash provided by financing activities  14,147,282   16,290,804 
         
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH  (18,229)  (724,738)
         
CASH - BEGINNING OF YEAR  85,073   809,811 
         
CASH - END OF YEAR $66,844  $85,073 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES        
Cash paid for interest expense $23,055  $20,106 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 
         
SUMMARY OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:        
         
Reclassification of assets of discontinued operations to current operations in fixed assets $-  $193,904 
Recognition of non-controlling interest - Agora $-  $30,000 
Lease liability recognized for ROU asset $-  $506,610 
Vehicle trade-in for note payable $-  $80,325 
Bifurcation of derivative liability in registered direct offering $-  $

11,201,869

 
Issuance costs on mezzanine equity $193,416  $- 
Non-controlling interest recorded in consolidation of Wolf Energy Services, Inc. $2,003,211  $- 
Preferred shares/derivative liability converted into common stock $3,182,393  $- 
Mezzanine equity reclassified to liability upon amendment $9,551,074  $- 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

F-5

 

 

BITNILE METAVERSE INC. AND SUBSIDIAIRES

(FORMERLY ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARIES)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER
MARCH
31, 2016 AND 2015
2023

 

NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

On March 15, 2023, Ecoark Holdings Inc. changed their name to BitNile Metaverse Inc. (“EcoarkBitNile Metaverse”, “Ecoark Holdings” or the “Company”) is an innovative and growth-oriented company founded in 2007 that develops and deploys intelligent technologies and products in order to meet the demand for sustainable, integrated solutions to contemporary business needs. Ecoark Holdings isthey are a holding company, incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 19, 2007. Through March 31, 2023, the Company’s former wholly owned subsidiaries with the exception of Agora Digital Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Agora”) and Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs”) have been treated for accounting purposes as divested. See below in this Note 1 and Note 2 “Discontinued Operations.” As a result of the divestitures, all assets and liabilities of the former subsidiaries have been reclassified to discontinued operations on the consolidated balance sheet for March 31, 2022 and all operations of these companies have been reclassified to discontinued operations and loss on disposal on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

The Company’s principal subsidiaries consisted of Ecoark, Inc. (“Ecoark”), a Delaware corporation which was the parent of Zest Labs, Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”) and Agora which was assigned the membership interest in Trend Discovery Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation (all references to “Trend Holdings” or “Trend” are now synonymous with Agora) from the Company on September 17, 2021 upon its formation, which includes Bitstream Mining, LLC, the Company’s Bitcoin mining subsidiary.

As disclosed in these Notes, the Company had decided it was in the best interests of its stockholders that supportsit divest all of its principal operating assets through a series of spin-offs or stock dividends to the Company’s stockholders. It intended to do so either by engaging in business combinations with existing public companies which have trading symbols and markets like White River Energy Corp (formerly Fortium Holdings Corp.) (“WTRV”) which acquired White River Holdings Corp on July 25, 2022, and Wolf Energy Services, Inc. (formerly Enviro Technologies US, Inc.) (“Wolf Energy”) which acquired Banner Midstream Corp. on September 7, 2022, or by direct dividends. The Company’s plan was also driven by the dividends it must pay to an investor which provided $12 million on June 8, 2022 in exchange for preferred stock and a warrant, the former of which was subsequently amended, and the latter of which was subsequently cancelled. Because all spin-offs require the transactions to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company did not complete any spin-offs in fiscal 2023. Because of the plans to spin-off its principal operating subsidiaries, the Company was searching for one or more operating businesses to acquire. As discussed below in Note 1 and in Note 3, the Company acquired BitNile.com on March 7, 2023. The Company has decided to leave Agora and Zest Labs in the Company and to not proceed with the spin-offs of these entities, although it intends to create a trust to distribute at least 95% of the net proceeds of the pending Zest Labs litigation recoveries, if any, to the Company’s stockholders as of September 30, 2022. The Company currently plans to transfer all of the common stock of Zest Labs Inc. into a limited liability company, of which any net proceeds from the sale or licensing of Zest intellectual property or the aforementioned potential net proceeds from Zest litigation would be distributed to the Company’s shareholders of record as of November 15, 2022.

See the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2022 on Form 10-K filed July 7, 2022 for details regarding the businesses of its subsidiaries in providing technological solutions for customers to achieve ecological conservation through improvements in efficiency or reduction of waste. EcoarkWhite River Holdings is the parent company of Ecoark, Inc.Corp, Banner Midstream Corp and Magnolia Solar Inc.Trend Discovery Holdings, LLC.

 

Ecoark, Inc.(“Ecoark”) was founded in 2011On July 25, 2022, the Company entered into and is located in Rogers, Arkansas,closed a Share Exchange Agreement, by and among the home office for EcoarkCompany, White River and Ecoark Holdings. Ecoark merged intoWTRV. As a result, White River became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Magnolia Solar Corporation (“MSC”WTRV and issued the Company non-voting Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A”) on March 24, 2016, with Ecoark aswhich is convertible into approximately 82% of WTRV’s common stock (not giving effect to the surviving entity. Atconversion of outstanding common stock equivalents) after the merger, MSC changed its nameCompany elects to Ecoark Holdings, Inc. Ecoarkspin-off WTRV common stock to the Company’s stockholders and a registration statement covering the spin-off has been declared effective. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is also the Executive Chairman of WTRV, and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer is the parent companyChief Executive Officer of Eco3d, Eco360, Pioneer ProductsWTRV. The former Chief Executive Officer and Zest Labs (formerly knowndirector of WTRV is the son-in-law of the Company’s Executive Chairman, and he resigned from all positions with WTRV in connection with the closing. The new Board of Directors (the “Board”) of WTRV includes the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Executive Officer’s daughter as Intelleflex Corporation).well as three other designees. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary in this transaction and has concluded that no consolidation is required for White River as a variable interest entity.

 

Eco3d, LLC (“Eco3d”


On August 23, 2022 the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) is located in Phoenix, Arizonawith Wolf Energy and provides customers with 3d technologies. Eco3d was formed by Ecoark in November 2013Banner Midstream. Pursuant to the Agreement, upon the terms and Ecoark owned 65%subject to the conditions set forth therein, the Company acquired 51,987,832 shares of the LLC. The remaining 35% was reflected as non-controlling interest until September 2016 when Ecoark Holdings issued shares ofWolf Energy common stock in exchange for all of the 35% non-controlling interest. Eco3dcapital stock of Banner Midstream owned by the Company, which represents 100% of the issued and outstanding shares (the “Exchange”). Following the closing of the Agreement which occurred on September 7, 2022, Banner Midstream continues as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wolf Energy. On September 7, 2022, the Exchange was completed, and Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wolf Energy. The shares the Company that were issued by Wolf Energy represented approximately 70% of the total voting shares of Wolf Energy that were outstanding as of that time. As a result, the Company consolidates Wolf Energy in its consolidated financial statements; however because it is the intent of the Company to distribute these shares in Wolf Energy to the stockholders of the Company upon the effectiveness of a registration statement filed by Wolf Energy, the Company has classified the assets and liabilities of Wolf Energy and the results of operations of Wolf Energy in discontinued operations. See Note 2.

On February 8, 2023, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “SEA”) by and among Ault Alliance, Inc. (“Ault”), the owner of approximately 86% of BitNile.com, Inc. (“BitNile.com”), a significant shareholder of the Company, and the minority stockholders of BitNile.com (the “Minority Shareholders”). The SEA provides 3d mapping, modeling,that, subject to the terms and consulting servicesconditions set forth therein, the Company will acquire all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of BitNile.com as well as the common stock of Earnity, Inc. beneficially owned by BitNile.com (which represents approximately 19.9% of the outstanding common stock of Earnity, Inc. as of the date of the SEA), in exchange for clientsthe following: (i) 8,637.5 shares of newly designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company to be issued to Ault (the “Series B”), and (ii) 1,362.5 shares of newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company to be issued to the Minority Shareholders (the “Series C,” and together with the Series B, the “Preferred Stock”). The Series B and the Series C, the terms of which are summarized in retail, construction, healthcare,more detail below, each have a stated value of $10,000 per share (the “Stated Value”), for a combined stated value of $100,000,000, and subject to adjustment are convertible into a total of up to 13,333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock, which represent approximately 92.4% of the Company outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis. The Company has independently valued the Series B and Series C as of the date of acquisition. The combined value of the shares issued to Ault was $53,913,000 using a blended fair value of the discounted cash flow method and option pricing method. See Note 3 for the details on the asset purchase as BitNile.com did not meet the accounting definition of a business and Note 17 for details on the Series B and C Preferred Stock.

The terms of the Series B and Series C as set forth in the Certificates of Designations of the Rights, Preferences and Limitations of each such series of Preferred Stock (each, a “Certificate,” and together the “Certificates”) are essentially identical except the Series B is super voting and must approve any modification of various negative covenants and certain other industries throughoutcorporate actions as more particularly described below.

Pursuant to the United States. Eco3dSeries B Certificate, each share of Series B is transitioning businessesconvertible into a number of shares of the Company’s common stock determined by dividing the Stated Value by $7.50, or 1,333 shares of common stock. The conversion price is subject to certain adjustments, including potential downward adjustment if the Company closes a qualified financing resulting in at least $25,000,000 in gross proceeds at a price per share that is lower than the conversion price. The Series B holders are entitled to receive dividends at a rate of 5% of the Stated Value per annum from 2d technologyissuance until February 7, 2033 (the “Dividend Term”). During the first two years of the Dividend Term, dividends will be payable in additional shares of Series B rather than cash, and thereafter dividends will be payable in either additional shares of Series B or cash as each holder may elect. If the Company fails to make a dividend payment as required by the Series B Certificate, the dividend rate will be increased to 12% for as long as such default remains ongoing and uncured. Each share of Series B also has an $11,000 liquidation preference in the event of a liquidation, change of control event, dissolution or winding up of the Company, and ranks senior to all other capital stock of the Company with respect thereto other than the Series C with which the Series B shares equal ranking. Each share of Series B is entitled to vote with the Company’s common stock at a rate of 300 votes per share of common stock into which the Series B is convertible.

In addition, for as long as at least 25% of the shares of Series B remain outstanding, Ault (and any transferees) must consent rights with respect to certain corporate events, including reclassifications, fundamental transactions, stock redemptions or repurchases, increases in the number of directors, and declarations or payment of dividends, and further the Company is subject to certain negative covenants, including covenants against issuing additional shares of capital stock or derivative securities, incurring indebtedness, engaging in related party transactions, selling of properties having a value of over $50,000, altering the number of directors, and discontinuing the business of any subsidiary, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.


The terms, rights, preferences and limitations of the Series C are substantially the same as those of the Series B, except that the Series B holds certain additional negative covenant and consent rights, and Series C holders vote with the Company’s common stock on an as-converted basis. The Company is required to maintain a reserve of authorized and unissued shares of common stock equal to 200% of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, which is initially 26,666,667 shares.

Pending stockholder approval of the transaction, the Series B and the Series C combined are subject to a world19.9% beneficial ownership limitation. That limitation includes shares of digital 3d. Eco3d incorporatesSeries A issued to Ault on June 8, 2022 and any common stock held by Ault. Certain other rights are subject to stockholder approval as described below. The SEA provides that the Company will seek stockholder approval following the closing. The entire transaction is subject to compliance with Nasdaq Rules and the Series B and Series C Certificates each contain a varietysavings clause that nothing shall violate such Rules. Nasdaq may nonetheless disregard the savings clause.

Under the SEA, effective at the closing Ault is entitled to appoint three of 3d technologiesthe Company’s directors, and following receipt of approval from the Company’s stockholders, a majority of the Company’s directors. The SEA also provides the holders of Preferred Stock with most favored nations rights in the event the Company offers securities with more favorable terms than the Preferred Stock for as long as the Preferred Stock remains outstanding. Under the SEA, while any Preferred Stock is outstanding, the Company is prohibited from redeeming or declaring or paying dividends on outstanding securities other than the Preferred Stock. Further, the SEA prohibits the Company from issuing or amending securities at a price per share below the conversion price of the Preferred Stock, or to achieve customer goalsengage in variable rate transactions, for a period of 12 months following the closing.

The SEA further provides that following the closing the Company will prepare and objectives. Utilizing several techniques, Eco3d can capture existingdistribute a proxy statement and hold a meeting of its stockholders to approve each of the following: (i) the SEA and the transactions contemplated thereby, (ii) a ratification of the Third Certificate Designations of Rights, Preferences, and Limitations of the Series A, (iii) a reverse stock split with a range of between 1-for 2 and 1-for-20, (iv) a change in the Company’s name to BitNile.com, Inc., (v) an increase of the Company’s authorized common stock to 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock; and (vi) any other proposals to which the Parties shall mutually agree. In addition, pursuant to the SEA the Company agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to effect its previously announce spin-offs of the common stock of Wolf Energy and White River held by or issuable to the Company, use its best efforts to complete one or more financings resulting in total gross proceeds of $100,000,000 on terms acceptable to Ault, and financially support the ongoing Zest Labs litigation. The holders of the Preferred Stock will not participate in the aforementioned spin-offs and distribution. In connection with the SEA, the Company and Ault also agreed that the net litigation proceeds from the Zest Labs litigation that was ongoing as of November 15, 2022 would be held in a trust for the benefit of the Company’s stockholders of record as of such date.

In connection with the SEA, the Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Ault and the Minority Shareholders pursuant to which the Company agreed to file a registration statement on Form S-3 or Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) registering the resale by the holders of the Preferred Stock and/or the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, to be initially filed within 15 days of the closing, and to use its best efforts to cause such registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC within 45 days thereafter, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

The SEA contains certain representations and warranties made by each of the Company, Ault and the Minority Shareholders. Upon the closing, which is subject to the closing conditions set forth in the SEA, including among other conditions the parties obtaining a fairness opinion from a national independent valuation firm and satisfactory completion of due diligence by each of the Company and Ault, BitNile.com will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. BitNile.com’s principal business entails the development and operation of a metaverse platform, the beta for which launched on March 1, 2023. This transaction closed on March 7, 2023.

On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest a total of $115 million in damages (later reduced to $110 million) which includes $65 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”) liable on three counts. The federal jury found that Walmart misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. See Note 19 topography, buildings, exterior/interior spaces, etc.Commitments and ContingenciesLegal Proceedings. 


Trend Holdings formed four subsidiaries, including Bitstream Mining, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Bitstream”), on May 16, 2021. In addition, Trend Holdings owned Barrier Crest, LLC (“Barrier Crest”) which was acquired along with Trend Capital Management, Inc. (“TCM”). On June 17, 2022, Agora sold Trend Holdings to an entity formed by the investment manager of Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV and sold Trend Discovery Exploration LLC (“Trend Exploration”) to the Company. See Note 2, “Discontinued Operations”. The Company reclassified the operations of Barrier Crest and TCM, as discontinued operations as the disposal represents a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results as of March 31, 2022.

The Company made this determination for these segments to be held for sale as the criteria established under ASC 205-20-45-1E have been satisfied as of June 8, 2022. Under ASC 855-10-55, the Company has reflected the reclassification of assets and liabilities of these entities as held for sale and the operations as discontinued operations as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022. The Company accounted for this sale as a disposal of the business under ASC 205-20-50-1(a) upon the closing of the sale on June 17, 2022 at which time the gain was recognized. 

The Company assigned its membership interest in highly accurate detailTrend Holdings and its related wholly owned subsidiaries to Agora on September 22, 2021, for the sale of the initial 100 shares for $10. On October 1, 2021, the Company purchased 41,671,121 shares of Agora common stock for $4,167,112 which Agora used to purchase equipment to commence the Bitstream operations.

Agora was organized by Ecoark Holdings to enter the Bitcoin mining business. Because of the plunge in the price of Bitcoin in 2022 and the type of miners Agora acquired during its attempt to close an initial public offering, Agora determined it was not presently feasible to conduct Bitcoin mining operations and ceased such activities on March 3, 2022. In September 2022, Agora determined to become a power-centric hosting company and thus, subject to raising capital, will focus its attention on generating revenues in this capacity.

On August 4, 2021, the Company’s common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market. 

On September 9, 2022, the Company held an annual meeting of its stockholders, and the stockholders approved the issuance of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock sold on June 8, 2022. Additionally, the stockholders approved increasing authorized common stock to 100,000,000 shares. Articles of Amendment were filed that allowsday.

On October 28, 2022, the Company and Ecoark, Inc. assigned all of its residual intellectual property rights and rights in the Zest Labs lawsuits to Zest Labs in connection with the anticipated spin-off of Zest Labs common stock to the Company’s stockholders. The Board of Directors subsequently determined not to proceed with the Zest Labs spin-off, however the assignment was not affected by that determination.

On May 4, 2023, the Company amended their Certificate of Incorporation for 2d and 3d measurement. These measurements form thea 1-for-30 reverse stock split. The Company also reduced their authorized shares on a 1-for-30 basis for analysis, design, documentation, and quality control.going from 100,000,000 authorized shares down to 3,333,333 authorized shares. The Company has reflected this reverse split retroactively in their consolidated financial statements pursuant to SAB Topic 4C.

 

Eco360, LLCOverview of BitNile.com Metaverse (“Eco360”

BitNile.com will generate revenue from their Metaverse primarily through the sale of tokens or coins that provide the end user with interactive entertainment (game play) and durable goods principally for the PC and mobile platforms. The Company primarily offer the following:

1.Metaverse access – Provide access to main game content.
2.Sale of Nile Tokens (“NT”) – NT’s can be used for additional digital game play only
3.Sale of Nile Coins (“NC”) –NC’s can be used to participate in games of skill, buy durable goods, etc. all within the digital platform
4.SweepCoins (“SC”) – Users can use SC to enter sweepstakes type games with a potential to win both digital goods and real world cash and prizes.


While the revenue received from the sale of NT and NC’s (collectively the “coins”) is locatedcurrently nominal and nothing as of March 31, 2023, we believe that our operation of the BitNile.com website could be a scalable source of revenue in Rogers, Arkansasthe future. Additionally, we expect the website will be a mechanism to help increase our brand reputation and engagedrecognition by participants, which we believe will result in researchthe acquisition and development activities. Eco360 was formedmonetization of new users to the site.

Our games operate on a free-to-play model, whereby game players may collect coins free of charge through the passage of time and if a game player wishes to obtain coins above and beyond the level of free coins available to that player, the player may purchase additional coin packages (“Freemium” gaming model). Once a purchase is completed, the coins are deposited into the player’s account and the NT’s and NC’s are not separately identifiable from previously purchased coins or coins obtained by the game player for free. Once obtained, NT and NC (either free or purchased) cannot be redeemed for cash nor exchanged for anything outside of the Metaverse. The items these virtual coins can be spent on are generally classified as either (1) consumables (i.e., items that are consumed by a specific action and are no longer available to a customer once consumed, such as virtual game play) or (2) durables (digital goods, i.e., items that are accessible to a player for use throughout the entire game, such as clothing or skins). When coins are used and played in November 2014 by Ecoark. Eco360the games, the game player could “win” and would be awarded additional coins or could “lose” and lose the future use of those coins. We have concluded that the coins represent both consumable goods and durables, because 1) the game player does not currently havereceive any active operations.additional benefit from the game and is not entitled to any additional rights once the coins are consumed and 2) because once coins are used for the purchase of durable goods, those goods will continue to benefit the player throughout their gaming life cycle.

We receive customer payments via payment processors based on the payment terms established in our terms of service (“TOS”). Payments for the purchase of NT and NC’s are made via a payment processor (remitted to us on a daily basis), and such payments are non-refundable in accordance with our standard TOS.

The Company holds no cryptocurrency or is an owner of any digital wallets containing currencies other than fiat currency.

 

Pioneer Products, LLCOverview of Agora Digital Holdings, Inc. (“Pioneer Products”) is located in Rogers, Arkansas and is involved in the selling of recycled plastic products and other products. It sells to the world’s largest retailer. Pioneer Products strategically leverages its role as a supplier to this retailer with existing and new products. This subsidiary recovers plastic waste from retail supply chains that becomes new consumer products from the reclaimed materials. Pioneer Products was purchased by Ecoark in 2012. Pioneer Products acquired Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC in a stock transaction on May 3, 2016.

 

Sable Polymer Solutions, LLCBitstream (“Sable”) is located in Flowery Branch, Georgia

Bitstream was organized to be our principal Bitcoin mining subsidiary. Bitstream entered into a series of agreements andspecializes in arrangements including arranging for a reliable and economical electric power source needed to efficiently mine Bitcoin, order miners, housing infrastructure and other infrastructure to mine Bitcoin and locate a third-party hosting service to operate the sale, purchase and processing of post-consumer and post-industrial plastic materials. It provides products to a variety of suppliers and customers throughout the plastics processing industry, from small extruders, molders and scrap collectors to large corporations.

Zest Labs, Inc.(“Zest Labs”) is located in San Jose, California and offers food retailers and suppliers intelligent, on-demand solutions for retailers and companies that ship and store products for perishable food quality management. Zest Labs’ ZEST Data Services is a secure, multi-tenant cloud-based data collection platform for aggregating and real-time permission-based sharing and analysis of information. ZEST Fresh, a fresh food management solution that utilizes the ZEST Data Services platform, focuses on three primary value propositions – consistent food quality, reduced waste, and improved food safety. ZEST Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence at a pallet level. ZEST Delivery offers real-time monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food. Zest Labs (then known as Intelleflex Corporation) was purchased by Ecoark in September 2013. Effective on October 28, 2016, Intelleflex Corporation changed its name to Zest Labs, Inc. to align its corporate name with its missionminers and the brand nameservice’s more advanced miners.

As discussed in this Note 1, Agora has refocused its efforts and will become a power-centric hosting company rather than a Bitcoin mining company and will not hold any Bitcoin in its digital wallets. To that end, Agora entered into a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”) on December 7, 2022 with BitNile, Inc. (“BitNile”), whereby BitNile agreed to provide mining equipment which Agora would host at its West Texas location and supply the electricity for the cryptocurrency mining. The MSA requires Agora to initially provide up to 12MW of its products and services.

Magnolia Solar Inc. (“Magnolia Solar”) is located in Woburn, Massachusetts and is principally engaged inelectricity at the development and commercializationWest Texas site for BitNile’s use. An additional 66MW of nanotechnology-based, high-efficiency, thin-film technology thatpower can be depositedmade available to BitNile as well for a total of 78MW. To meet this obligation, the Company is required to raise at least $5,000,000 to enable the build out of the hosting facility, including the initial 12MW of power within 45 days of the date of the MSA. As of the date of this Report, this requirement has not been met. Agora has not received any miners in this transaction as of March 31, 2023.

All significant accounting policies related to Pinnacle Frac, Capstone, White River, Shamrock, Barrier Crest and Trend Discovery Capital Management have been removed as these entities are reflected in discontinued operations. For full details on a variety of substrates, including glass and flexible structures. Magnolia Solar was a subsidiary of MSC that merged with Ecoarkthe policies refer to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 24, 2016 to create Ecoark Holdings and continues operations as a subsidiary of Ecoark Holdings.31, 2022 filed on July 7, 2022.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include

On May 31, 2019, the accountsCompany entered into an Agreement and Plan of EcoarkMerger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Trend Discovery Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, collectively referredInc., a Delaware corporation for the Company to as “the Company”. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Ecoark Holdings is a holding company that holdsacquire 100% of Trend Discovery Holdings, LLC pursuant to a merger of Trend with and into the Company (the “Merger”). Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc. ceased doing business upon completion of the merger and Trend Discovery Holdings LLC is the subsidiary of the Company. Upon the formation of Agora on September 17, 2021, Ecoark and Magnolia Solar. Ecoark holds 100% of Eco360, Pioneer Products (which owns 100% of Sable), Zest Labs and Eco3d (Ecoarkassigned the membership interest it owned 65% of Eco3d and the remaining 35% interest was owned by executives of Eco3d untilin Trend Holdings to Agora on September 201622, 2021 when the executives’ 35% interest was acquiredCompany purchased 100 shares of Agora common stock for $10. 


On March 27, 2020, the Company and Banner Midstream Corp (“Banner Midstream”), entered into the Banner Purchase Agreement to acquire Banner Midstream. Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and Banner Energy Services, Inc. (“Banner Parent”) received shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for 525all of the issued and outstanding shares of Ecoark Holdings stock).Banner Midstream. The Company sold all divisions of Banner Midstream in July 2022 and September 2022 as discussed herein.

 

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810Consolidation of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—are consolidated except when control does not rest with the parent. 

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8, the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree.

 

F-6

The Company has utilized the guidance under ASC 810-10-55-4B, Case A for a Change that has resulted in the recognition of non-controlling interest. On October 1, 2021, Agora issued restricted common stock to non-employee directors, management, employees and advisors. As a result of the restricted common share issuances, the Company now owns less than 100% of Agora (approximately 89%). The Company expects it will continue to control Agora until it completes the distribution of Agora common stock to its security holders described above; after that event occurs, it may still have sufficient equity ownership to control Agora unless one or more third parties acquire a larger equity position.

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESDuring the year ended March 31, 2023, Agora issued 400,000 shares of common stock to consultants and management. As a result of these issuances, the Company’s ownership percentage in Agora dropped from approximately 90% to approximately 89%.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)The Company sold both White River and Banner Midstream in July and September 2022, respectively. These entities are no longer subsidiaries of the Company. The Company has investments in WTRV and Wolf Energy that represent the shares it received for the sale of these entities. The investment in WTRV is in non-voting preferred shares, and Management has concluded that the Company is not the primary beneficiary in this transaction, and thus no consolidation is required for White River as a variable interest entity. The Company currently owns approximately 66% of the total issued common shares of Wolf Energy and has consolidated Wolf Energy; however, the Company expects to distribute these shares to its stockholders of record as of September 30, 2022, and thus has reflected Wolf Energy in the discontinued operations of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2023.

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER

On March 7, 2023 the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of BitNile.com as well as the common stock of Earnity, Inc. beneficially owned by BitNile.com (which represents approximately 19.9% of the outstanding common stock of Earnity, Inc. as of the date of the SEA), in exchange for the following: (i) 8,637.5 shares of Series B and (ii) 1,362.5 shares of Series C. The BitNile.com acquisition was accounted for as an acquisition of a group of assets as this entity did not meet the accounting definition of a business under ASU 2017-01.

The following are the subsidiaries of the Company as of March 31, 2016 AND 20152023:

Bitnile.com, Inc. 100%

Ecoark, Inc., 100%

Zest Labs, Inc., 100%

Agora Digital Holdings, Inc., 89%

Reclassifications

The Company has reclassified certain amounts in the March 31, 2022 consolidated financial statements to be consistent with the March 31, 2023 presentation, including the reclassification of Barrier Crest, TCM, White River, Pinnacle Frac, and Capstone assets and liabilities from continuing operations to held for sale and reclassifications of operations of Barrier Crest, TCM, White River, Pinnacle Frac, and Capstone to discontinued operations. The March 31, 2022 consolidated balance sheet has been reclassified to include the assets and liabilities sold for White River, Pinnacle Frac, and Capstone as well. These changes had no impact on the Company’s financial position or result of operations for the periods presented.  

Noncontrolling Interests

 

In accordance with ASC 810-10-45Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,the Company classifies noncontrolling interests as a component of equity within the consolidated balance sheet. In September 2016,October 2021 and July 2022, with the 35% noncontrollingissuance of restricted common stock to directors, management and advisors, the Company no longer owns 100% of Agora. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, approximately 11% and 9.1% is reflected as non-controlling interest of Eco3d was acquired in exchange for 525 sharesthat entity. In addition, we have reflected 34% of Ecoark Holdings stock which eliminatedWolf Energy as noncontrolling interests as the noncontrolling interest. 

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulationsCompany represents approximately 66% of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or the “SEC”). It is management’s opinion that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. As a result of the merger transaction describedvoting interests in Note 2 and in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 14C and ASC 805-40-45, the Company has given retroactive effect to certain share calculations by restating amounts for common shares, additional paid-in capital and treasury shares in the December 31, 2015 balance sheet and statements of operations.Wolf Energy.

Reclassification 

The Company has reclassified certain amounts in the 2015 consolidated financial statements to comply with the 2016 presentation. These principally relate to classification of certain revenues, cost of revenues and related segment data that had no impact on gross profit, as well as certain research and development expenses. 


Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, management’s estimate of provisions required for uncollectible accounts receivable, obsolete or slow-moving inventory, fair value of assets held for sale and assets and liabilities acquired, impaired value of equipment and intangible assets, estimates of discount rates in lease, liabilities to accrue, allocationfair value of home office expenses for segment reportingderivative liabilities associated with warrants, cost incurred in the satisfaction of performance obligations, permanent and temporary differences related to income taxes and determination of the fair value of stock awards.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash

Cash consists of cash, demand deposits and money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less. Revenue Recognition

The Company holds no cash equivalents.recognizes revenue under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company maintains cash balances in excesscore principle of the FDIC insured limit. revenue standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle:

Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer

Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract

Step 3: Determine the transaction price

Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

Step 5: Recognize revenue when the Company satisfies a performance obligation

In order to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, a company must assess the promised goods or services in the contract and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct” good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria are met: The customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer (i.e., the good or service is capable of being distinct), and the entity’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (i.e., the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct within the context of the contract).

If a good or service is not distinct, the good or service is combined with other promised goods or services until a bundle of goods or services is identified that is distinct. 

The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. When determining the transaction price, an entity must consider the effects of all of the following:

Variable consideration

Constraining estimates of variable consideration

The existence of a significant financing component in the contract

Noncash consideration

Consideration payable to a customer


Variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. 

The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis. The standalone selling price is the price at which the Company would sell a promised service separately to a customer. The relative selling price for each performance obligation is estimated using observable objective evidence if it is available. If observable objective evidence is not available, the Company uses its best estimate of the selling price for the promised service. In instances where the Company does not considersell a service separately, establishing standalone selling price requires significant judgment.

The Company estimates the standalone selling price by considering available information, prioritizing observable inputs such as historical sales, internally approved pricing guidelines and objectives, and the underlying cost of delivering the performance obligation. The transaction price allocated to each performance obligation is recognized when that performance obligation is satisfied, at a point in time or over time as appropriate.

Management judgment is required when determining the following: when variable consideration is no longer probable of significant reversal (and hence can be included in revenue); whether certain revenue should be presented gross or net of certain related costs; when a promised service transfers to the customer; and the applicable method of measuring progress for services transferred to the customer over time.

Although, Agora since March 3, 2022, has not recognized revenue from its mining operations, prior to this risk to be material. time, it recognized revenue upon satisfaction of its performance obligation over time in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-27 for its contracts with mining pool operators.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lowerThe Company accounts for incremental costs of cost or market. Inventory cost is determined onobtaining a first-in first-out basis that approximates average costcontract with a customer and at standard cost, which approximates averagecontract fulfillment costs in accordance with ASC 330-10-30-12. Provisions340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs. These costs should be capitalized and amortized as the performance obligation is satisfied if certain criteria are made to reduce slow-moving, obsolete, or unusable inventories to their estimated useful or scrap values.met. The Company establishes reserveselected the practical expedient, to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the asset that would otherwise have been recognized is one year or less, and expenses certain costs to obtain contracts when applicable. The Company recognizes an asset from the costs to fulfill a contract only if the costs relate directly to a contract, the costs generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying a performance obligation in the future and the costs are expected to be recovered. The Company recognizes the cost of sales of a contract as expense when incurred or when a performance obligation is satisfied. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are capitalized unless the costs would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract was obtained, are not considered recoverable, or the practical expedient applies. 

Bitcoin Mining

The discussion here should be understood as being applicable while Agora was conducting mining operations which it ceased beginning March 3, 2022. On September 16, 2022, the Company determined to conduct operations as a power-centric hosting company, rather than a Bitcoin mining company. For the past revenue recognition, refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 7, 2022.

Hosting Revenues

Agora effective in September 2022 began efforts to generate revenue via hosting agreements. Agora entered into a MSA on December 7, 2022 with BitNile, whereby BitNile agreed to provide mining equipment which Agora would host at its West Texas location and supply the electricity for the cryptocurrency mining, subject to the Company raising $5 million to support the hosting operations. See Note 1. “Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

When Agora generates hosting revenues, it will follow ASC 606 as outlined above and recognize revenue upon the completion of the performance obligations as stipulated under the MSA. For the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, no revenue has been recognized under any hosting agreements.

All Bitcoin that is mined under these arrangements will be transmitted directly into the third-party digital wallets and the Company will not hold any Bitcoin in its accounts.


Gaming Revenue

The authoritative guidance on revenue recognition for gaming revenue is ASC 606. The objectives of ASC 606 are to establish the principles that an entity shall apply to report useful information to users of the financial statements about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a contract with a customer. We determined this purpose.would not be subject to ASC 985-605 because the customers cannot take possession of the online games. That is, this type of arrangement would not be accounted for as a transfer of a software license.

Property and Equipment and Long-Lived Assets 

Property and equipment is stated at cost. DepreciationDepending on property and equipment is computedthe circumstances, the guidance may be applied on a contract-by-contract basis, or the practical expedient described in ASC 606-10-10-4 of using the straight-line method overportfolio approach may be followed.

The portfolio approach allows an entity to apply the estimated useful livesguidance to a portfolio of contracts with similar characteristics so long as the result would not differ materially from the result of applying the guidance to individual contracts. We have determined that the use of the assets, which range from two to ten yearsportfolio approach is the most appropriate for our contracts as the TOS and related promises or obligations are identical for all classes of propertycustomers/gamers.

There were no revenues recognized for gaming during the years ended March 31, 2023 and equipment, except leasehold improvements which are depreciated over2022.

Step 1: Identify the termContract with the Customer

STEP 1 of the lease, whichrevenue recognition model requires that we identify the contract(s) with a customer. This section discusses the steps to determine whether a contract exists and specific considerations that may impact that determination.

Per ASC 606-10-25-1, the five criteria for identifying a contract are as follows:

1.The parties have approved the contract and are committed to perform.

a.Our contracts consist of TOS for the sale of coins to gamers

2.Each party’s rights are identifiable:

a.Rights are identifiable in contracts with customers and are documented within our Terms of Service

3.Payment terms are identifiable:

a.Payment terms are identifiable in contracts with the end customer. The consideration from the sale of coins comes from gamers and the payment terms are identified prior to entering into the contract and are listed in our TOS.

4.The contract has commercial substance:

a.Generally, an executed sale of coins and related cash flow is evidence of commercial substance.

5.The collection is probable based on the customer’s ability and intent to pay:

a.We collect the consideration from a reputable third-party transaction processor and is not dependent on their collection from the gamers indicating that it is probable we will collect.

Step 2: Identify the Performance Obligations

While there is shorter thanno explicit promise that we will provide the estimated usefulMetaverse game play service on a continuous basis, we believe that there is an implicit promise to do so. We considered the nature of the implied promise and took in to account the following items that we consider to be relevant to our assessment:

Whether the nature of the implied promise is to provide an enhanced gaming experience through the hosted service over time or to enable the player to consume virtual items immediately

The period over which the enhanced gaming experience is provided if the benefits are consumed throughout the hosting period (e.g., user life, gaming life).


The life span over which, or number of times, the virtual good or item may be accessed or used.

Whether the virtual good or item must be used immediately or can be stored for use later.

How and over what period the virtual item benefits the customer’s gaming experience (e.g., a consumable such as spending coins for game play vs. a durable avatar skin that allows a player to upgrade within the game in such a way that it continues to enhance the game players experience).

If the benefit of purchasing the virtual item or good on the customers gaming experience is temporary or permanent.

We have an obligation to provide a playable game content service to the customer to enable the customer to consume purchased coins within the Metaverse on either additional game play or in-game digital goods. For the sale of consumable virtual items, the Company recognizes revenue as the items are consumed.

As the durable goods (upgraded equipment, clothing, avatars, etc.) are purchased with NC’s and then used throughout the remainder of the life of the improvements. 

FASB Codification Topic 360Property, Plantgamer, we considered if they were material in the context of the contract and Equipment (“ASC 360”), requiresrepresented a distinct and separate promise or obligation to be recognized over the life of the gamer. We determined that long-lived assetsthese goods cannot be beneficial on their own without providing of the full Metaverse service with which to utilize the goods and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicatetherefore concluded that the carrying amount of an asset maygoods are not distinct as they do not meet both the criteria in ASC 606-10-25-19 through 606-10-25-21. Due to not being a distinct promise or separately identifiable per ASC 606-10-25-21(c), the durable goods should not be recoverable.

The Company reviews recoverability of long-lived assets onseparated from the game play service promise and should be treated as a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicatecombined or bundled service with a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. The Company did consider it necessary to record impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2016 for equipment acquired as part of the Sable acquisition. Fixed assets to be disposed of by sale are carried at the lower of the then current carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

ASC 360-10 addresses criteria to be considered for long-lived assets expected to be disposed of by sale. Six criteria are listed in ASC 360-10-45-9 that must be met in order for assets to be classified as held for sale. Once the criteria are met, long-lived assets classified as held for sale are to be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. In December 2016 management decided to outsource its densification activities at the Sable facility in Georgia. All six criteria were met and thus the densification and related equipment have been adjusted to fair value and reclassified to current assets in the December 31, 2016 balance sheet.

Intangible assets with definite useful lives are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment. Intangible assets capitalized as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 represent the valuation of the Company-owned patents and customer lists. These intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated average useful lives of thirteen and a half years for the patents and three years for the customer lists. Expenditures on intangible assets through the Company’s filing of patent and trademark protection for Company-owned inventions are expensed as incurred. 

F-7

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

The Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

1. Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;

2. Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and

3. Significant negative industry or economic trends.

When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows. The Company tested the carrying value of its intangible assets for recoverability. The projected undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying value of these assets for the Company-owned patents. The Company did consider it necessary to record impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2016 for customer lists and goodwill recorded as part of the Sable acquisition.

Advertising Expense 

The Company expenses advertising costs, as incurred. Advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, which were nominal, are included in other general and administrative costs.

Software Costs 

The Company accounts for software development costssingle performance obligation in accordance with ASC 985-730 Software Research606-10-25-22.

We also considered the awarded SC’s that can be obtained through marketing giveaways, for purchasing a NC package or by the mailing in of a request for SC’s. We considered if the SC’s were material in the context of the contract and Development,represented a distinct and ASC 985-20Costsseparate promise or obligation. The SC’s can be redeemed for cash once a certain minimum has been obtained/won through sweepstakes type games. No contract or obligation exists until the SC holder has accumulated a minimum amount of Softwarewon coins (different than gifted coins) through playing sweepstakes games which is able to be Sold, Leased or Marketed. ASC 985-20 requires that costs relatedtracked within the system. While not considered material at the individual contract level, we believe the rewards program as a whole could be significant and would convey a material right to the developmenttotal rewards for all customers once earned (similar to “free” loyalty points earned by a credit card user) and therefore represents a separate performance obligation.

Based on our assessment of the Company’s productsbe capitalized as an asset when incurred subsequentdifferent coins sold above we are able to conclude that there are two separate performance obligations. One to provide playable game content service to the point at which technological feasibilitycustomer to enable the customer to consume purchased coins within the Metaverse on either additional game play or in-game digital goods and the second is to redeem players cash redemptions of SC’s once qualified.

Step 3: Determine the enhancementtransaction price

The transaction price depends on the coin package selected and is established and prior to when a product is available for general release to customers. ASC 985-20 specifies that technological feasibility can be established by the completion of a detailed program design. Costs incurredCompany’s management and stated in the contract with our customer prior to achieving technological feasibilitypurchase. Any changes to the price are expensed.made prior to a transaction and the updated price is clearly displayed for the customer to see. The Company does utilize detailed program designs; however,gamer indicates their agreement to this price prior to the Company’s productspurchase of the coin package or would not engage further and wouldn’t purchase additional coins. The coin package transaction prices are released soon after technological feasibilitynoted in the table below:

Coin Package Orders Price 
    
10k NILE-T $2 
25k NILE-T / 4 NILE-S $5 
50k NILE-T / 9 NILE-S $10 
100k NILE-T / 20 NILE-S $20 
250k NILE-T / 51 NILE-S $50 
500k NILE-T / 103 NILE-S $100 
1.5M NILE-T / 310 NILE-S $300 


Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations

The transaction price should be allocated between the two performance obligations based on their stand-alone selling prices. The NT’s transaction prices would be allocated completely to the first performance obligation while the NC’s sales would need to be allocated between the first and second obligations. As the SC’s can’t be purchased, the amount allocated to the SC’s redemption for cash obligation should be based on management’s best estimates.

In order to estimate and allocate the transaction price between the two obligations, we considered the following inputs:

The sweepstakes games win percentage

The amount of SC’s it will take to qualify for cash redemption (minimum of 50 won coins accumulated)

The cash value of 1 SC that is available to be redeemed

The likelihood that the cash redemption option will be exercised (breakage of total outstanding SC’s)

The stand-alone selling price of the NC coin packages that include “free” SC’s

The percentage of purchased NC’s consumed during the period

We also took into consideration the reward point allocation example in ASC 606-10-55-353 - 356 as the nature of the obligations and related estimated redemptions are similar in nature.

Based on that example we determined the allocation between NC and SC revenue to be calculated considering the following assumptions:

Total sweeps game win percentage is equal to 4% of all SC’s issued

A minimum of 50 qualifying coins must be accumulated in a players account to be redeemable

We assume that 90% of won coins were actually redeemed (not assumed, just used in example below as most users consume all their SC’s rather than redeem)

The value of 1 redeemable SC is equal to $1

We estimate that 99% of purchased NC’s are consumed during the period they were purchased

Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation

Step 5 of the revenue recognition model requires the company to recognize revenue when (or as) it satisfies a performance obligation.

For the NT and NC coins this is determined by the estimated consumption of purchased coins by the customer which indicates the performance obligation has been establishedsatisfied and as a result software development costs have been expensed as incurred.

Researchrevenue can be recognized at that point in time. We estimate the amount of outstanding purchased NT and Development Costs

Research and development costsNC virtual currency at period end based on customer behavior, because we are expensed as incurred. These costs include internal salaries and related costs and professional fees for activities relatedunable to development.distinguish between the consumption of purchased or free virtual currency. The majority of these costs relate to the ZEST Data Services platform, ZEST Fresh and ZEST Delivery.

Subsequent Events 

Subsequent events were evaluated through the date the consolidated financial statements were filed.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company reports shipping and handling revenues and their associated costs in revenue and cost of revenue, respectively. Shipping revenues and costs for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were nominal and included in cost of product sales. 

Revenue Recognition 

Product revenue primarily consistsestimated amount is based on an analysis of the sale of recycled plastics products, electronic hardwarecustomers’ historical play behavior, the timing difference between when virtual currencies are purchased by a customer and furniture. Revenuewhen those virtual currencies are consumed in game play, which historically has been relatively short.

For the SC’s, revenue is recognized when the following criteriaCompany has satisfied its performance obligation (point in time) relating to the redemption of coins for cash as this can be tracked and would not need to be estimated.

We will initially reduce the revenue recognized for the two obligations for the unredeemed coins by booking a contract liability and then recognize the revenue when we have determined the NT and NC coins have been met:abandoned by the player or have expired and for the SC’s, when the cash reward has been redeemed.


Additional considerations

Evidence

Principal vs. Agent

We intend to recognize revenues on a gross basis because we have control over the pricing, content and functionality of an arrangement exists. The Company considers a customer purchase order, service agreement, contract, or equivalent document to be evidence of an arrangement. 

Delivery has occurred. The Company’s standard transfer terms are freecoins and games on board (“FOB”) shipping point. Thus, delivery is considered to have occurred when titleour providers platform. We evaluated our current agreements with our platform providers (Meet Kai) and risk of loss have passed toend-user agreements and based on the customer at the time of shipment. 

The fee is fixed or determinable.The Company considers the fee to be fixed or determinable if the fee is not subject to refund or adjustment and payment terms are standard, which is generally 30-60 days. 

Collection is deemed reasonably assured. Collection is deemed reasonably assured if it is expectedpreceding, we determined that the customer will be able to pay amounts underCompany is the arrangement as payments become due. If itprincipal in such arrangements and Meet Kai is determined that collection is not reasonably assured, then revenue is reserved and recognized upon cash collection. 

The Company will recognize revenues for its softwarethe agent in accordance with ASC 985-605Software Revenue Recognition. The606-10-55-37. As the principal, the Company has not generatedrecognizes revenue from software licensingin the gross amount and as such, we treat the percentage of sales paid to Meet Kai as an expense. Any future changes in these arrangements asor to our games and related method of December 31, 2016.distribution may result in a different conclusion.

 

F-8

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Revenue from software license agreements is recognized when persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery of the software has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. In software arrangements that include more than one element, the Company allocates the total arrangement fee among the elements based on the relative fair value of each of the elements.

License revenue allocated to software products generally is recognized upon delivery of the products or deferred and recognized in future periods to the extent that an arrangement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a future date and for which fair values have not been established. Revenue allocated to maintenance agreements is recognized ratably over the maintenance term and revenue allocated to training and other service elements is recognized as the services are performed. If evidence of fair value does not exist for all elements of a license agreement and post customer support (“PCS”) is the only undelivered element, then all revenue for the license arrangement is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement as license revenue. If evidence of fair value of all undelivered PCS elements exists but evidence does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue.

Cost of license revenue primarily includes product, delivery, and royalty costs. Cost of maintenance and service revenue consists primarily of labor costs for engineers performing implementation services, technical support, and training personnel as well as facilities and equipment costs.

The Company may enter into arrangements that can include various combinations of software, services, and hardware. Where elements are delivered over different periods of time, and when allowed under U.S. GAAP, revenue is allocated to the respective elements based on their relative selling prices at the inception of the arrangement, and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. The Company uses a hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”), (ii) third-party evidence, and (iii) best estimate of selling price (“ESP”). For software elements, the Company follows the industry specific software guidance which only allows for the use of VSOE in establishing fair value. Generally, VSOE is the price charged when the deliverable is sold separately or the price established by Management for a product that is not yet sold if it is probable that the price will not change before introduction into the marketplace.

ESPs are established as best estimates of what the selling prices would be if the deliverables were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. The process for determining ESPs requires judgment and considers multiple factors that may vary over time depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable. 

When the arrangement with a customer includes services or significant production, modification, or customization of software, we recognize the related revenue using the percentage-of-completion method in accordance with the accounting guidance and certain production-type contracts contained in ASC 605-35Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. We use the percentage-of-completion method provided all of the following conditions exist:

the contract includes provisions that clearly specify the enforceable rights regarding goods or services to be provided and received by the parties, the consideration to be exchanged and the manner and terms of settlement;

the customer can be expected to satisfy its obligations under the contract;

the Company can be expected to perform its contractual obligations; and

reliable estimates of progress towards completion can be made.

We measure completion based on progress achieved on deliverables detailed in the agreements with the customers. Costs of providing services, including services accounted for in accordance with ASC 605-35, are expensed as incurred and matched with the related revenues.

Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company considers accounts receivable, net of allowance for returns and doubtful accounts, to be fully collectible. The allowance is based on management’s estimate of the overall collectability of accounts receivable, considering historical losses, credit insurance and economic conditions. Based on these same factors, individual accounts are charged off against the allowance when management determines those individual accounts are uncollectible. Credit extended to customers is generally uncollateralized, however credit insurance is obtained for some customers, and other receivables are enforceable by liens.customers. Past-due status is based on contractual terms.

 

Uncertain Tax PositionsFair Value Measurements

ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

The carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments such as cash, investments, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses and derivative liabilities on preferred stock and warrants approximate their respective fair values because of the short-term nature of those financial instruments.

Bitcoin assets will be presented in current assets. Fair value will be determined by taking the price of the coins from the trading platforms which Agora will most frequently use. 

Bitcoin

Prior to March 3, 2022 when the Company was mining Bitcoin, it included the Bitcoin in current assets in the consolidated balance sheets as intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. Bitcoin was recorded at cost less impairment. For the past Bitcoin accounting policies, refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 7, 2022. As of March 31, 2023, the Company neither owns nor mines any Bitcoin, and has no plans to mine or own any digital assets in the future.

 

The Company follows ASC 740-10Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This requires recognition and measurementImpairment of uncertain income tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” approach. Management evaluates their tax positions on an annual basis.Assets

 

The Company files income tax returnsManagement reviews their assets for impairment, including intangible assets and investmentswhenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the U.S. federal tax jurisdictioncarrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and various state tax jurisdictions. The federal and state income tax returnsused is measured by a comparison of the Company are subjectcarrying amount of an asset to examinationthe undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the IRS and state taxing authorities, generally for three years after they were filed.

Vacation and Paid-Time-Off Compensation

The Company follows ASC 710-10Compensation – General. The Company records liabilities and expense when obligationsasset. If such assets are attributableconsidered to services already rendered, will be paid even if an employeeimpaired, the impairment to be recognized is terminated, payment is probable andmeasured by the amount can be estimated.

F-9

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Share-Based Compensation

The Company follows ASC 718-10Share Based Payments. The Company calculates compensation expense for all awards granted, but not yet vested, based onby which the grant-date fair values. Share-based compensation expense for all awards granted is based on the grant-date fair values. The Company recognizes these compensation costs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, on a pro rata basis over the requisite service period of each vesting tranche of each award. The Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as trends of actual option forfeitures when estimating the forfeiture rate.

The Company measures compensation expense for its non-employee share-based compensation under ASC 505-50Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. The fair valuecarrying amount of the option issued is used to measure the transaction, as this is more reliable thanassets exceeds the fair value of the services received. The fair value is measured at the value of the Company’s common stock on the date that the commitment for performance by the counterparty has been reached or the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to expense and additional paid-in capital.assets. 

 


Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsSegment Information

ASC 825Financial Instruments requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments: The carrying amount of cash, certificates of deposit, accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and accounts payable to related parties, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company does not utilize derivative instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s debt instruments also approximates fair value.

Leases

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 840280-10 LeasesSegment Reporting.  in accounting for leased properties. The Company leases several office facilitiesclassified its reporting segments in these three divisions through March 31, 2022, when the Company determined that pursuant to ASC 205-20-45-1E that the operations related to the Financial Services segment would be reclassified as held for sale as those criteria identified in the pronouncement had been satisfied as of June 8, 2022. Under ASC 855-10-55, the Company has reflected the reclassification of assets and production facilitiesliabilities of these entities as held for terms typically ranging from three to fivesale and the operations as discontinued operations as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022. Under ASC 855-10-55, the Company has reflected the sale of these entities and the operations as discontinued operations as of and for the years ended March 31, 2023 and does not act as2022. As a lessor. Rent escalations over the term of a lease are considered at the inceptionresult of the lease such thatshare exchanges involving White River and Wolf Energy, and the monthly average for all payments is recordedimmaterial nature of the operations of Zest Labs and operations of BitNile.com which just recently began operations in the Company March 7, 2023, the Company no longer segregates its operations as straight-line rent expense with any differences recorded in accrued liabilities.most of the limited continuing operations are related to Agora.

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) include additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as convertible notes, preferred stock, stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants.

Common stock equivalents are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reports a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for periods presented.presented, so only the basic weighted average number of common shares are used in the computations.

 

Fair Value MeasurementsDerivative Financial Instruments

ASC 820Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

Segment Information

The Company follows the provisionsdoes not currently use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Management evaluates all of ASC 280-10Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which management disaggregates the Company in making internal operating decisions. For 2016 and 2015 the Company and its Chief Operating Decision Makers determined that the Company’s operations were divided into two segments: Products and Services. See Note 13 for segment information disclosures.

F-10

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Related-Party Transactions

Partiesfinancial instruments, including warrants, to determine if such instruments are considered to be related to the Company if the parties directlyderivatives or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal stockholders of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal stockholders of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal where one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extentcontain features that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.qualify as embedded derivatives. The Company discloses all material related-party transactions. All transactions shallgenerally uses a Black-Scholes model, as applicable, to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates when needed. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-measured at the end of each reporting period. The Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of the goodsderivative liabilities. 

In August 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40), Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contract’s in an Entity’s Own Equity. The ASU simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for it. The ASU simplifies the diluted net income per share calculation in certain areas.

Debt Modifications

In May 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2021-04 “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation— Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815- 40) Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or services exchanged. Property purchased fromExchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options” which clarifies and reduces diversity in an issuer’s accounting for modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. An entity should measure the effect of a modification or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option that remains equity classified after modification or exchange as follows: i) for a modification or an exchange that is a part of or directly related party is recorded atto a modification or an exchange of an existing debt instrument or line-of-credit or revolving-debt arrangements (hereinafter, referred to as a “debt” or “debt instrument”), as the cost todifference between the related party and any payment to or on behalffair value of the related party inmodified or exchanged written call option and the fair value of that written call option immediately before it is modified or exchanged; ii) for all other modifications or exchanges, as the excess, if any, of the costfair value of the modified or exchanged written call option over the fair value of that written call option immediately before it is reflected as compensationmodified or distribution to related parties depending on the transaction.exchanged.


Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-15Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in this update provided guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. This update is to provide specific guidance on each of the eight issues, thereby reducing the diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.

The Company is assessing thedoes not discuss recent pronouncements that are not anticipated to have an impact if any, of implementing this guidance on or are unrelated to its financial position,condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

Liquidity /Going Concern

For the years ended March 31, 2023 and liquidity.2022, the Company had a net loss to controlling interest of common stockholders of $(82,111,016) and $(9,925,394), respectively, has working capital (deficit) of $(25,095,950) and $(8,394,850) as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and has an accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2023 of $(208,677,438). As of March 31, 2023, the Company has $66,844 in cash and cash equivalents.

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company sold its interests in Banner Midstream in two separate transactions on July 25, 2022 and September 7, 2022. In March 2016,addition, it sold the FASB issued ASU 2016-09Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718).non-core business of Trend Discovery on June 17, 2022. The amendmentsCompany expects to distribute the common stock it received (or issuable upon conversion of preferred stock) in ASU 2016-09the sales to its stockholders upon the effective registration statements for the two entities the companies were issued as partsold to. See Note 17, “Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock” for information on the Company’s recent $12 million convertible preferred stock financing. That financing has restrictive covenants that require approval of the FASB’s simplification initiative focused on improving areas of GAAPinvestor for which cost and complexity may be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of information disclosed within the financial statements. The amendments focused on simplification specifically with regardCompany to share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards asengage in any equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance in ASU 2016-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. debt financing.

The Company believes that the current cash on hand is evaluatingnot sufficient to conduct planned operations for one year from the effect of ASU 2016-09 for future periods.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02Leases (Topic 842).ASU 2016-02 changes the accounting for leased assets, principally by requiring balance sheet recognition of assets under lease arrangements. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impactissuance of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on its consolidated financial statements. 

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Abilitystatements, and it needs to Continue as a Going Concern. This standard sets forth management’s responsibilityraise capital to evaluate, each reporting period, whether there issupport their operations, raising substantial doubt about the Company’sits ability to continue as a going concern, and if so, to provide related disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 31, 2016.concern. The Company has evaluated this guidance,recently acquired BitNile.com and assesseddid not generate revenues as of March 31, 2023. The Company’s metaverse continues to attract users reaching over 1,000,000 in just the impact in its evaluation of going concern.

first month alone. In May 2014, August 2015 and May 2016,addition, upon entering into the FASB issued ASU 2014-09Revenue from ContractsMSA with Customers, ASU 2015-14Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Deferral of the Effective Date, and ASU 2016-12Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, respectively, which implement ASC Topic 606. ASC Topic 606 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting forBitNile, potential hosting revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP, including industry-specific guidance. It also requires entities to disclose both quantitative and qualitative information that enable financial statements users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty ofcould generate revenue and cash flows arisingearnings for the Company. If revenue is generated from contracts with customers. The amendments in these ASUs are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. These ASUs may be applied retrospectively with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings in the year of adoption. The Company is assessing the impact, if any, of implementing this guidance on its financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

There were other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to have a material impact onMSA, management expects that it will go towards covering the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 

Going Concern 

The Company has experienced losses from operations resulting in an accumulated deficit of $61,936 since inception. The accumulated deficit as well as recurring losses of $25,349operating costs and $10,502 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, cash used in operating activities in 2016 and 2015 were $14,097 and $7,671, respectively, and working capital of $1,470 as of December 31, 2016, have resulted in the uncertainty of the Company’s abilityto allow it to continue as a going concern.

These consolidated However, in order to proceed under the MSA, the Company will require additional financing to fund its future planned operations. MSA contemplates the Company providing services and infrastructure to BitNile to enable the build out of the hosting facility, including the initial 12MW of power within 45 days of the date of the MSA which as disclosed above was not met. We have generated no revenue to date under any hosting arrangement. The accompanying financial statements offor the Companyperiod ended March 31, 2023 have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things,but the realizationability of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable period of time. 

The Company raised $17,320 of additional capital, net of expenses, in a private placement subsequent to the reverse merger transaction on March 24, 2016 (see Note 2). The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through future equity and debt securities issuances is unknown. The Company raised additional debt and equity financing as described in Note 16 subsequent to December 31, 2016 and has plans to raise up to $80,000 related to a shelf registration filed with the SEC. Obtaining additional financing and the successful development of the Company’s strategic plan to achieve profitability are necessary for the Company to continue operations. Theas a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it establishes continued revenue streams and becomes profitable. Management’s plans to continue as a going concern include raising additional capital through sales of equity securities and borrowing. However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans. If the Company is engaged in discussions withnot able to obtain the necessary additional financing on a potential major customertimely basis, the Company will be required to significantly increase revenues and expand operations.delay, reduce or perhaps even cease the operation of its business. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully resolve these factors raises substantial doubt aboutsecure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. In the Company’s abilityfourth fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2023, the Company raised $1,715,439 from the sales of its common stock related to an “At-the-Market” (“ATM”) offering, with an additional approximate $1,800,000 raised in the first fiscal quarter of 2024. In addition, on April 27, 2023, the Company sold $6.875 million of principal face amount senior secured convertible notes with an original issue discount to sophisticated investors for gross proceeds to the company of $5.5 million. The notes mature on April 27, 2024 and are secured by all of the assets of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, including BitNile.com. The proceeds received have gone towards working capital until the Company can generate the necessary funds from their operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. See “Risk Factors” included in this Annual Report.

Impact of Business

COVID-19 did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations or the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

COVID-19 has also contributed to the supply chain disruptions which have not had a material effect for the Company. The Company will continue to monitor potential supply chain shortages affecting its business.

The extent to which COVID-19 may impact the Company’s results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severity of the virus and the actions to contain its impact.

In addition, the war in Ukraine, growing inflation and climate change factors did not materially impact the Company’s business during the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.


NOTE 2: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On June 17, 2022, the Company sold Trend Discovery to an entity formed by the investment manager of Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV for a three-year $4,250,000 secured note (see Note 4). Each of the Trend Discovery subsidiaries including Barrier Crest guaranteed the note and provided Agora with a first lien on its assets. The Company accounted for this sale as a disposal of the business under ASC 205-20-50-1(a). The Company had reclassified the operations of Barrier Crest and Trend Discovery Capital Management (the other entities were inactive) as discontinued operations as the disposal represents a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. The Company made this determination for these segments to be held for sale as the criteria established under ASC 205-20-45-1E had been satisfied as of June 8, 2022. Under ASC 855-10-55, the Company has reflected the reclassification of assets and liabilities of these entities as held for sale and the operations as discontinued operations as of and for the year ended March 31, 2022 as well as for the period April 1, 2022 through June 17, 2022. The Company accounted for this sale as a disposal of the business under ASC 205-20-50-1(a) on June 17, 2022 at which time the gain was recognized. As a result of this reclassification, the Company identified the following assets and liabilities that were reclassified from continuing operations to discontinued operations as they are discontinued.

On July 25, 2022, the Company sold its oil and gas production business (White River) which is part of the Commodities segment. The Company has reflected the reclassification of assets and liabilities of these entities discontinued operations as of and for the period April 1, 2022 through July 31, 2022. The Company used July 31, 2022 as a cut-off as a majority of its revenue and expenses are billed on a monthly basis and it is more convenient to do so.

On September 7, 2022, the Company sold its transportation business (Pinnacle Frac and Capstone) which is part of the Commodities segment. The Company has reflected the reclassification of assets and liabilities of these entities discontinued operations as of and for the period April 1, 2022 through August 31, 2022. The Company used August 31, 2022 as a cut-off as a majority of its revenue and expenses are billed on a monthly basis and it is more convenient to do so. The shares the Company were issued by Wolf Energy currently represent approximately 66% of the total voting shares of Wolf Energy. As a result, the Company will consolidate Wolf Energy in the consolidated financial statementsstatements. It is the intent of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result fromto distribute these shares in Wolf Energy to the outcomestockholders of the uncertainties.Company upon the effectiveness of a registration statement filed by Wolf Energy. Therefore, the Company has classified the assets and liabilities of Wolf Energy and the results of operations of Wolf Energy in discontinued operations. For a full description of the Wolf Energy Services, Inc. operations, refer to their 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2023 filed on June 26, 2023.

Current assets as of March 31, 2023 and 2022 – Discontinued Operations:

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
Cash $-  $391,125 
Accounts receivable  -   1,075,960 
Inventory  -   107,026 
Prepaid expenses  -   838,731 
Wolf Energy Services, Inc.  1,297,801   - 
  $1,297,801  $2,412,842 

Non-current assets as of March 31, 2023 and 2022 – Discontinued Operations: 

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
Goodwill $-  $10,224,046 
Property and equipment, net  -   3,117,962 
Intangible assets, net  -   1,716,331 
Oil and gas properties, full cost-method  -   6,626,793 
Capitalized drilling costs, net of depletion  -   604,574 
Right of use asset – operating and financing leases  -   608,714 
Wolf Energy Services, Inc.  984,071   - 
  $984,071  $22,898,420 

F-11


 

Current liabilities as of March 31, 2023 and 2022 – Discontinued Operations:

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $-  $2,419,909 
Current portion of long-term debt  -   572,644 
Current portion of lease liability – operating and financing leases  -   345,441 
Wolf Energy Services, Inc.  2,952,257   - 
  $2,952,257  $3,337,994 

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESNon-current liabilities as of March 31, 2023 and 2022 – Discontinued Operations:

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
Lease liabilities – operating and financing leases, net of current portion $-  $282,638 
Long-term debt  -   67,512 
Asset retirement obligations  -   1,303,751 
Wolf Energy Services, Inc.  377,786   - 
  $377,786  $1,653,901 

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)The Company reclassified the following operations to discontinued operations for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

  2023  2022 
Revenue $10,955,153  $26,367,979 
Operating expenses  17,110,005   35,026,774 
Wolf Energy Services, Inc.  – net loss  (11,287,671)  - 
Other (income) loss  560,831   673,423 
Net loss from discontinued operations $(18,003,354) $(9,332,218)

The following represents the calculation of the gain on disposal of Trend Discovery at June 17, 2022: 

Secured Note Receivable $4,250,000 
Cash  (27,657)
Accounts receivable  (222,400)
Prepaid expenses  (99,566)
Goodwill  (3,222,799)
Other assets  (284)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  34,211 
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations $711,505 

The following represents the calculation of the loss on disposal of Banner Midstream Corp in two separate transactions – July 25, 2022 and September 7, 2022: 

Investment – White River Energy Corp./Wolf Energy Services, Inc. $35,328,753 
Cash  (3,000,000)
Forgiveness of amounts due from subsidiaries  (39,997,461)
Reversal of investment booked on March 27, 2020 when acquired  (4,866,192)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations $(12,534,900)


NOTE 3: ASSET PURCHASE

 

NOTE 2: MERGER

On January 29, 2016, Ecoark entered into a Merger Agreement (“Merger Agreement”) with MSC providing, among other things, forAs discussed in Notes 1 and 17, on March 7, 2023, the acquisition of Ecoark by MSC in a share for share exchange pursuant to which it was contemplated that at the closing Ecoark shareholders would own approximately 95% of the outstanding shares of MSC. On March 18, 2016, in a special meeting called by MSC, the shareholders of MSC approved proposals necessary to complete the Merger (“Merger”).

On March 24, 2016, the Merger was closed. Upon the closing of the transaction, under the Merger Agreement, Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corporation merged with and into Ecoark with Ecoark as the surviving corporation, which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of MSC. Thereafter, MSC changed its name to Ecoark Holdings, Inc.Company acquired BitNile.com from Ault. The transaction wasCompany accounted for this acquisition as an asset purchase as BitNile.com did not meet the definition of a reverse acquisition; for accounting purposes Ecoarkbusiness as discussed in ASC 805 and ASU 2017-01. We acquired the assets from a significant shareholder, Ault Alliance, Inc.

The Company acquired the assets and liabilities of Magnolia Solar effective March 24, 2016. The historical financial information presented prior to March 24, 2016 is that of Ecoark.

Further, the Articles of Incorporation were amended to increase the authorized shares of common stock to 100,000 shares, to effect the creation of 5,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, and to approve a reverse stock split of the MSC common stock of 1 for 250. 

After the Merger, the Company had 29,057 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. MSC’s shareholders and holders of debt, notes, warrants and options received an aggregate of 1,351 shares of the Company’s common stock and Ecoark’s shareholders received an aggregate of 27,706 shares of the Company’s common stock.BitNile.com noted below at fair value.

 

Prepaid expenses $620,616 
Property and equipment  330,190 
Intangible assets   6,239,000 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (3,186,513)
Due to BitNile.com former parent  (4,404,350)
Notes payable  (170,222)
  $(571,279)

As

The consideration paid for the acquisition of BitNile.com was as follows (see Note 17):

Series B and Series C Preferred Stock $53,913,000 
Total consideration $53,913,000 

The Acquisition has been accounted for as a resultpurchase of the Merger and in accordance with SAB Topic 14C and ASC 805-40-45, theassets. The Company has given retroactive effect to the transaction by adjusting the number of shares in the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and accompanying notes. The retroactive treatment changed the reported common shares and additional paid-in capital in the balance sheets, the shares used in the calculation of netrecognized a loss per share and resulting net loss per share in the statements of operations, the number of shares and related dollar amounts in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and various disclosures regarding number of shares and related amounts in these notes to consolidated financial statements. There was no effect on the net loss or total stockholders’ equity (deficit)acquisition of $54,484,279 as a result of this acquisition in the restatement.

The change became effective on March 24, 2016 when the Merger closed.

The financial statements presented hereinConsolidated Statements of Operations for the period throughyear ended March 24, 2016 represent the historical financial information of Ecoark, Inc., except for the capital structure as of December 31, 2015 which represents the historical amounts of MSC, retroactively adjusted to reflect the legal capital structure of MSC.2023.

 

NOTE 3: INVENTORY

Inventory consisted of the following as of December 31: 

  2016  2015 
Inventory $2,391  $1,363 
Inventory reserves  (338)  (620)
Total $2,053  $743 

NOTE 4: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31:

  2016  2015 
Machinery and equipment $2,839  $476 
Computers and software costs  715   382 
Furniture and fixtures  226   110 
Leasehold improvements  90   4 
Total property and equipment  3,870   972 
Accumulated depreciation and impairment  (928)  (609)
Property and equipment, net $2,942  $363 

F-12

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $414 and $159, respectively. The 2016 expense includes $193 of depreciation on manufacturing equipment that is classified as cost of product sales. An impairment charge of $326 was recorded in 2016 ($276 related to assets reclassified to held for sale and $50 for other equipment at Sable). The Company decided to outsource its densification process and therefore has plans to sell the densifiers and related equipment acquired in the Sable acquisition. That equipment was written down to estimated fair value of $203 ($503 in equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $24 and the impairment of $276) and is included in current assets at December 31, 2016. Approximately $2,744 of equipment at Sable serves as collateral for debt. There was no impairment on property and equipment in 2015. In the third quarter of 2016 $134 of equipment with accumulated depreciation of $109 was retired resulting in a noncash loss of $25, and $12 of fully depreciated property and equipment was retired in 2015.

NOTE 5: INTANGIBLE ASSETS 

Intangible assets consisted of the following as of December 31: 

  2016  2015 
Customer lists $5,007  $3,980 
Patents  1,090   1,013 
Goodwill, net of impairment  582   - 
Total intangible assets  6,679   4,993 
Accumulated amortization and impairment  (5,032)  (4,141)
Intangible assets, net $1,647  $852 

The increase in customer lists and the goodwill above resulted from the acquisition of Sable more fully described in Note 15. Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $338 and $1,067, respectively. The Company performed a review of its customers and business at Sable in late 2016. The decision was made to cease doing business with certain customers to improve profitability. As a result, impairment charges of $553 against the customer lists and a related write-down of goodwill of $682 from the initially recorded amount of $1,264 were recorded. There was no impairment on intangible assets in 2015. Amortization amounts for the next five years are: $221, $197, $110, $75 and $75.

NOTE 6: ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31: 

  2016  2015 
Professional fees and consulting costs $2,379  $110 
Share-based compensation  100   - 
Vacation and paid time off  319   149 
Payroll and employee expenses  294   92 
Settlement  -   100 
Other  272   92 
Total $3,364  $543 

NOTE 7: NOTE PAYABLE

The Company has a note payable pursuant to a line of credit maintained with a bank. The note is secured by the accounts receivable, inventory and equipment of Sable and has a 5.5% interest rate with interest payable monthly and a balloon payment due on November 18, 2017. The note, formerly guaranteed by the former owner of Sable, now a stockholder of the Company, originated July 15, 2015 with a maximum amount of $1,500. The balance of the note was $1,500 at December 31, 2016 and had an average amount outstanding of $1,500 for the period from acquisition on May 3, 2016 to December 31, 2016. The note was renegotiated with the bank, and on February 17, 2017 the bank renewed the line of credit. The Company has pledged a $1,500 certificate of deposit as collateral, and the guaranty of the former owner of Sable was eliminated. The note has standard covenants, and the Company is not in default of any covenant.

Interest expense on the note for the period from acquisition to December 31, 2016 was $44. Accrued interest at December 31, 2016 was not material.

F-13

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

NOTE 8: LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following as of December 31:

     2016  2015 
Note payable – B&B Merritt  (a)  $-  $3,000 
Note payable – Generations Bank  (b)   156   - 
Note payable – Generations Bank  (c)   171   - 
Line of credit – Bank of America  (d)   500   - 
Note payable – Celtic Bank  (e)   -   175 
Total      827   3,175 
Less: current portion      (185)  (3,175)
Long-term debt, net of current portion     $642  $- 
(a)Note payable bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum, unsecured, with quarterly interest payments commencing in January 2015. The note matured in December 2016. Upon maturity or any time prior, so long as the Company has not exercised its right to prepay this note, the lender could exercise its option to convert this note to equity in the Company, with 30-day advance written notice, and acquire up to 3,000 unrestricted Class A Common Shares of Ecoark at $1.00 per share, which consistent with the Merger Agreement equated to 1,500 shares of Ecoark Holdings at $2.00 per share. The principal amount along with any accrued interest thereon, if converted to equity would be deemed fully paid. The lender exercised its option to convert and 1,500 shares of common stock were issued to satisfy the note obligation in December 2016. There was no bifurcation of the conversion option as the conversion was deemed to be conventional in nature.
(b)Five-year note payable dated May 3, 2013 in the original principal amount of $500 accruing interest at 5.5% with monthly payments of $10 and secured by the plant equipment of Sable and the guaranty of the former owner of Sable, now a stockholder of the Company. The note has standard covenants, and the Company is not in default of any covenant.
(c)Five-year note payable dated February 3, 2014 in the original principal amount of $367 accruing interest at 5.5% with monthly payments of $7 and secured by the plant equipment of Sable and the guaranty of a stockholder of the Company and an entity controlled by the former owner of Sable, now a stockholder of the Company. The note has standard covenants, and the Company is not in default of any covenant.

(d)The Company has established a line of credit with Bank of America allowing the Company to draw up to $500. A certificate of deposit for $500 has been pledged as collateral to secure any outstanding borrowings.  The line of credit was established on June 27, 2016 and matures with a balloon payment due on June 27, 2018.  The interest rate on the borrowing is a floating interest rate equal to the LIBOR Daily Floating Rate plus 1.75 percentage points and all interest is paid monthly.  As of December 31, 2016, $500 has been drawn on the line.The line has standard covenants, and the Company is not in default of any covenant.
(e)Fifteen-year note payable dated July 11, 2007 in the original principal amount of $1,250 with a bank guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration with Pioneer Products, prior to the acquisition of Pioneer Products by Ecoark. Note accrued interest at the Prime Rate plus 2% (Prime rate 3.25% plus 2% for 2015). The note was fully paid in January 2016.

Interest expense on the long-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $366 and $234, respectively. Maturities of the long-term debt are as follows: 2017 - $185, $2018 - $628, 2019 - $14. Accrued interest at December 31, 2016 was not material.

See Note 16 for additional long-term debt transactions that occurred subsequent to December 31, 2016.

NOTE 9: RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Long-term debt – related parties consisted of the following as of December 31:

     2016  2015 
Promissory note #1 –CEO  (a)  $-  $1,217 
Promissory note #2 – CEO  (b)   -   62 
Promissory note –related party  (c)   -   50 
Debt – related parties     $-  $1,329 

(a)Note payable with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Randy May, commencing November 30, 2015 at an interest rate of 6% per annum (see note b). The beginning principal balance of $3,197 was reduced by $1,980 on December 31, 2015 in exchange for 1,100 shares of Ecoark Series A General Common Shares that were treasury shares owned by Ecoark. The remaining principal balance matured in November 2016 and was paid.

F-14

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

(b)Note payable to the Company’s CEO. On November 30, 2015, after monthly payments were being made, and additional amounts funded in March 2015 and May 2015 totaling $600, Ecoark combined these amounts into a new one-year promissory note in the amount of $3,197 due November 30, 2016. Note was paid in full in June 2016.
(c)Unsecured note payable to a former Ecoark shareholder bearing interest at 5% per annum, with monthly principal and interest payments beginning in November 2014, maturing in November 2016. Note was paid in full in March 2016.

Interest expense on the debt – related parties for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $47 and $41, respectively.REVENUE

 

The Company entered into a 10-year, renewable, exclusive license with Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc. (“Magnolia Optical”) on April 30, 2008recognizes revenue when it transfers promised services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for those services. In the year ended March 31, 2023 the Company recognized no revenue and for the exclusive rightsyear ended March 31, 2022, the Company recognized revenue from continuing operations related to their Bitcoin mining operations in the amount of $27,182. 

Metaverse

As discussed in Note 1 under revenue recognition, the Company realized and recognized no revenues from their Metaverse operations in the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Bitcoin Mining

Prior to March 3, 2022, the Company recognized revenue for Bitcoin mining as follows:

Providing computing power to solve complex cryptographic algorithms in support of Bitcoin blockchains, in a process known as “solving a block”, is an output of the technologyCompany’s ordinary activities. The provision of Magnolia Optical applicable to solar cell applications. Magnolia Optical shared a common Director and a common Officercomputing power is the only performance obligation in the Company’s contracts with mining pool operators, its customers. When the Company engaged in 2016.mining, satisfied its performance obligation over time as it provides computing power.

 

The contract term is short, limited to the period of time the Company’s miners were contributing to the mining pool computational operations in support of the blockchain, measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second”. The contract term was the payout period under the Company’s mining pool contracts, which is a twenty-four-hour period. After each contract period, the Company recordedhad the net license feeright to renew the contract for subsequent, successive payout periods. 


Bitcoin received in exchange for providing computing power represents noncash consideration. The fair value of $77the noncash consideration determined at contract inception was recognized in conjunction withrevenue as the Merger described in Note 2. Amortization will continueCompany performed over the remaining 22 months of the term. The Company’s management has determined thatcontract term using an output method based on hash rate contributed. Changes in the fair value of the license approximatesnoncash consideration post-contract consideration due to reasons other than form of consideration (that is, other than the bookprice of bitcoin or ether) were estimated under the expected value method but constrained from inclusion in the transaction price (and hence revenue) until end of the contract term when the uncertainty has been resolved and thus no impairmentamount was known.

The Company received payment for its provision of hash rate under the Pay-Per-Shares-Plus (“PPS+”) payment method. The payment method contains two components, (1) the block rewards issued by the blockchain network and paid by the mining pool operator, and (2) transaction fees generated from (paid by) blockchain users and distributed (paid out) to individual miners by the mining pool operator. The pool, as a collective entity, develops its own technology that, on one end, gathers individual miner’s hash rate, and on the other end contributes hash rate to the network to compete for block rewards from the network.

For PPS+, as long as individual miners contribute hash rate to the pool, the Company (as an individual miner) is necessaryentitled to receive its corresponding amount of block rewards based on the mining pool’s calculation methodology, which is standard across pool operators.

Block rewards are the new coins awarded to Bitcoin miners by the network (bitcoin for the bitcoin network) and is a theoretical number calculated by the mining pool operator based on inputs including difficulty level, network hash rate, and block rewards (for example, 6.25 for Bitcoin). Transaction fees refers to the total fees paid by users of the network to execute transactions. 

Digital asset transaction fees are payable to the mining pool operator to cover the costs of maintaining the pool and are deducted from the block reward payout. This fee was deducted from the block reward the Company received and recorded as a reduction of revenue because it does not represent payment for a distinct good or service.

Effective September 16, 2022, Agora commenced efforts to become a power-centric hosting company and if it becomes operational it will recognize revenue in accordance with the provisions of ASC 606.  

NOTE 5: SENIOR SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE RECEIVABLE

Agora was issued a Senior Secured Promissory Note by Trend Ventures, LP (“Trend Ventures Note”) on June 16, 2022. The Trend Ventures Note was the consideration paid to Agora for the acquisition of Trend Discovery Holdings. The Trend Ventures Note is in the principal amount of $4,250,000, bears interest at the rate of 5% per annum, and was to mature June 16, 2025. Under Trend Ventures Note, Trend Ventures, LP has agreed to make interest-only payments, in arrears on a monthly basis commencing on June 30, 2022 and continuing thereafter until June 16, 2023. Beginning on June 30, 2023, Trend Ventures, LP agreed to make 24 consecutive equal monthly payments of principal each in an amount which would fully amortize the principal, plus accrued interest. All principal and any unpaid accrued interest will be due and payable on or before the maturity date. The Trend Ventures Note will be granted a first lien senior secured interest as set forth in the Security Agreement executed on the same date as the Trend Ventures Note, by and among Trend Ventures, LP, its future subsidiaries (each a Guarantor) and Agora dated as of December 31, 2016.June 16, 2022. Trend has not made any interest payments on the Note.

 

As more fully described in Note 15, Pioneer Products acquired Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC on May 3, 2016 from a stockholder of the Company. In conjunction with the acquisition, a six-month consulting agreement was entered into with the stockholder ofMarch 31, 2023, the Company for a total fee of $30.

has recognized $168,229 in interest income and accrued interest receivable. The Company has waived Trend Ventures, LP’s failure to pay the interest.

 

See Note 1625, for additional related-party transactions that occurred subsequentthe amendment to December 31, 2016.

NOTE 10: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)the Trend Ventures Note entered into May 15, 2023.

 

As a result of the merger transaction described in Note 2 and in accordance with ASC 805-40-45,March 31, 2023, the Company has given retroactive effect to certain share numbersestablished a full reserve for the principal and calculations by restating amounts for common shares, additional paid-in capital and treasury stock in the December 31, 2015 balance sheet.accrued interest receivable.

NOTE 6: INVESTMENT – SERIES A CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK – WHITE RIVER ENERGY CORP

 

On March 24, 2016, Ecoark Common Shares were exchanged for Ecoark Holdings Common Shares as more fully described in Note 2.July 25, 2022, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement pursuant to which that day it sold to WTRV its oil and gas production business (White River) which is part of the Commodities segment. The Ecoark Common Shares, including Treasury Shares were canceled after the exchange.

Ecoark HoldingsCompany received 1,200 shares of WTRV’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,

On which becomes convertible into 42,253,521 shares of WTRV common stock upon such time as (A) WTRV has filed a Form S-1 with the SEC and such Form S-1 has been declared effective, or is no longer subject to comments from the Staff of the SEC, and (B) Ecoark elects to distribute shares of its common stock to its stockholders. Based on the lower of cost or market, the value of the investment was determined to be $30,000,000. As of March 18, 2016,31, 2023, WTRV has not had their registration statement declared effective. The Company has determined that as of March 31, 2023, there is no impairment of this investment. The Company engaged an independent valuation consultant who has determined there is a $20,775,215 loss on this investment and the Company created 5,000 sharesmarked the investment down to $9,224,785 as of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001. No preferred shares have been issued.

Ecoark Holdings Common Stock

As describedMarch 31 2023, and has reflected this in Note 2, 100,000 sharesthe Consolidated Statement of common stock, par value $0.001 were authorized on March 18, 2016. At the Merger, the Company had 29,057 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. MSC’s shareholders and holders of debt, notes, warrants and options received an aggregate of 1,353 shares of the Company’s common stock and Ecoark’s shareholders received an aggregate of 27,706 shares of the Company’s common stock.

In addition to the Merger, the following issuances of common stock occurred in 2016:

The Company issued 4,337 shares of the Company’s common stock as described in Note 1 pursuant to a private placement offeringOperations for $17,320.

The Company issued 775 shares for services rendered related to the Merger and to various consultants and an employee during the year valued at $3,584, at share prices ranging from $4.00 to $6.00 per share.

The Company issued 2,000 shares forended March 31, 2023 based on various approaches and methods of valuation including the acquisition of Sable valued at $3,786.

The Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) authorized Management to issue shares of common stock in exchange formarket approach and the noncontrolling interest held by executives of Eco3d. In September 2016, the Company issued 525 shares to acquire the noncontrolling interest.

The Company issued 98 shares for $487 in the exercise of warrants at $5.00 per share and cashless exercise of warrants for 2 shares.

The Company issued 9 shares for board compensation valued at $100.

The Company issued 1,500 shares to convert a long-term debt valued at $3,000.precedent transaction method.

 

F-15


 

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBERAs of March 31, 2016 AND 2015

The Company issued 63 shares for services rendered in 2015 at a value of $175, as well as $719 in treasury shares issued for services rendered. In addition to those shares,2023, the Company raised $8,430 (which included $55 from a subscription receivable collectedhas determined that Ecoark is not the primary beneficiary, and this transaction has not resulted in 2016) fromEcoark controlling WTRV as the sale of treasurypreferred shares in 2015 (and $200 in 2016 priorare unable to be converted until the Merger).

In addition, the Company issued treasury shares from the conversion of debt valued at $7,391.

Total shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 were 38,303.

Warrants

MSC had issued warrants for 15 shares (post-merger, formerly 3,785) that were converted into shares of common stock in accordance with the Merger Agreement with Ecoark. Consistent with the termseffectiveness of the Merger, 13 warrants were convertedregistration statement being filed for WTRV, does not have the power to shares at the timedirect activities of the Merger. The remaining 2 warrants were exercised in a cashless exchange for shares in the Company’s second quarter.

During 2016, the Company issued 4,337 warrants as part of the private placement that was completed on April 28, 2016, of which 98 of these warrants were exercised for common shares totaling $477, leaving warrants for 4,239 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016. These warrants have a strike price of $5.00 per share and expire on December 31, 2018.

Additional warrants were issued in October 2016 to a consultant. The warrant is exercisable into 100 shares common stock with a strike price of $2.50 per share that vested October 31, 2016 with an expiration date of October 31, 2018.

F-16

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Changes in the warrants are described in the table below:

  Number of Warrants  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 
Balance at December 31, 2014  15  $35.00   2.0 
Granted  -         
Exercised  -         
Forfeited  -         
Cancelled  -         
Balance at December 31, 2015  15  $35.00   1.0 
Granted  4,437  $4.94   2.0 
Exercised pre-Merger  (13)        
Exercised post-Merger  (98) $(5.00)    
Exercised, cashless, post-Merger  (2)        
Forfeited  -         
Cancelled  -         
Balance at December 31, 2016  4,339  $4.94   2.0 
Intrinsic value of warrants $250         

F-17

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Stock Options

On February 16, 2013,WTRV, control the Board of Directors of WTRV and WTRV is not reliant upon funding by Ecoark approvedmoving forward, therefore the Ecoark Inc. 2013 Stock Option Plan (the “Ecoark Plan”). The purposesCompany concluded that WTRV is not a VIE as of the Ecoark Plan were to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants, and to promote the success of the business. The Ecoark Plan was expected to contribute to the attainment of these objectives by offering employees, directors and consultants the opportunity to acquire stock ownership interests in Ecoark, and to thereby provide them with incentives to put forth maximum efforts for the success of Ecoark.March 31, 2023.

NOTE 7: INVESTMENT – COMMON STOCK – WOLF ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

 

Awards under this Ecoark Plan were only granted in the form of nonstatutory stock options (“Options) to purchase the Ecoark’s Series C Stock prior to the Merger with MSC. Under the terms of the Ecoark Plan and the Merger, the Options converted into the right to purchase shares of the Company.

In May 2014, Ecoark had granted Options to purchase 693 shares to various employees and consultants of Ecoark. The Options had an exercise price of $1.25 per share and have a term of 10 years. The Options were to vest over a three-year period as follows: 25% immediately; 25% on the first anniversary date; 25% on the second anniversary date; and 25% on the third anniversary date. During 2015 Ecoark issued additional Options on 625 shares of common stock. At the end of 2015, Options under the Ecoark Plan were outstanding to purchase 1,318 shares of common stock. The total original number of Options on 1,318 Ecoark shares was divided by two in conjunction with the exchange ratio required by the Merger Agreement and converted to Options to purchase 659 shares of the Company (Holdings) with an adjusted exercise price of $2.50. In September 2016, the remaining vesting was accelerated to have those Options 100% vested. In 2016, the Company issued options to purchase 125 shares of stock at a strike price of $2.50 per share to a consultant. These options vested immediately and expire on March 31, 2018. In the Company’s fourth quarter of 2016, an optionholder forfeited 125 options and thus, at December 31, 2016, Options on 659 shares of the Company were outstanding with an adjusted exercise price of $2.50. The Board of Directors adjusted the expiration date of these options to March 28, 2018.

Management valued the Options utilizing the Black-Scholes Method, with the following criteria: stock price - $2.50; exercise price - $2.50; expected term – 10 years; discount rate – 0.25%; and volatility – 55.32%.

The Company records share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 for employees and ASC 505 for non-employees, and has recorded share-based compensation of $1,419 and $366 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, relating to the Options. Changes in the Options under the Ecoark Plan are described in the table below.

  Number of Options  Weighted Average Exercise
Price
  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 
Balance at December 31, 2014  346  $2.50   2.7 
Granted  313  $2.50     
Exercised  -         
Forfeited  -         
Cancelled  -         
Balance at December 31, 2015  659  $2.50   2.1 
Granted  125  $2.50   0.4 
Exercised  -         
Forfeited  (125) $2.50     
             
Balance at December 31, 2016  659  $2.50   1.2 
Intrinsic value of options $1,648         

2013 Holdings Plan

The 2013 Incentive Stock Plan of Ecoark Holdings (previously MSC) (the “Holdings Plan”) was registered on February 7, 2013. Under the Holdings Plan, the Company may grant incentive stock in the form of Stock Options, Stock Awards and Stock Purchase Offers of up to 5,500 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant. At the time of the Merger, 5,497 shares were available to issue under the Holdings Plan. The Board has authorized blocks of incentive stock totaling 476 shares to be issued to various employees, consultants, advisors and directors of the Company through December 31, 2016, leaving 5,021 shares available to grant. Shares of Stock Awards totaling 159 were issued in 2016. In 2017, additional grants of 750 were granted in January and February, and 542 shares have been issued in these months.

F-18

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

A reconciliation of the shares available under the Holdings Plan is presented in the table below through December 31, 2016 

Number of Shares
Available under the Holdings Plan5,500
Granted pre-Merger(13)
Shares cancelled pre-Merger10
Available at the Merger date5,497
Shares granted post-Merger(476)
Options granted post-Merger-
Balance at December 31, 20165,021
Vested stock awards at December 31, 2016  176

Shares issued under the Holdings Plan through December 31, 2016.

  Number of Shares Issued  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 
Balance at December 31, 2014  3   - 
Issued  -   - 
Balance at December 31, 2015  3   - 
Issued post-merger  159   1.9 
Cancelled post-Merger  -   - 
Balance at December 31, 2016  162   1.9 

F-19

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

NOTE 11: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 

Operating Leases

The Company leases many of its operating and office facilities for various terms under long-term, non-cancelable operating lease agreements. These leases expire at various dates through 2021. Rent expense was approximately $687 and $337 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The amount for 2016 includes $200 in rent for Sable’s production facility which is included in cost of product sales. Future minimum lease payments required under the operating leases are as follows: 2017 - $796, 2018 - $753, 2019 - $606, 2020 - $300, and 2021 - $25. 

Contract Related Fees

Prior to the Merger, a subsidiary of the Company, as part of a contract to develop its products, has agreed to pay the contractor 1.5% of future New York state manufactured sales, and 5% of future non-New York state manufactured sales until the entire funds paid by a contractor have been repaid (or three times the funds if non-New York manufactured), or 15 years after start of sales. As of December 31, 2016, the subsidiary has $1,252 of contract related expenses. These funds will be owed to the contractor, as described above, contingent upon the sale of the subsidiary’s product related to that contract.

The Company has determined that a liability need not be accrued because management has determined that it is not probable sales will occur in this technology.

Lines of Credit

The Company has established a line of credit with a bank allowing the Company to draw up to $500 through June 27, 2018, with $500 drawn as of December 31, 2016. A certificate of deposit for $500 has been pledged as collateral to secure any borrowings under the line of credit. In addition, the Company has established a corporate credit card program with the same bank and has approximately $265 in an interest-bearing account at the bank to secure charges from the corporate card program. 

Royalties

The Company has cross-licensing agreements with several technology companies that require payment of royalties upon the sale and or use of certain patented technologies. One of these agreements requires minimum annual payments of $50 until the last of the patents expire.

Settlement

In March 2016, the Company agreed to settle a dispute regarding a contract. The agreement required the Company to pay $100 to certain parties within 30 days of the agreement. The amount was recorded as an operating expense and included in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2015.

Contract

The Company has engaged the services of a consultant for a period of three years. The arrangement calls for payments of $100 per year plus grants of common stock to pursue additional opportunities on behalf of the Company and its technology.

F-20

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

NOTE 12: INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC Topic 740: Income Taxes which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for both the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax losses and tax credit carryforwards.  ASC Topic 740 additionally requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets. The Company has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes totaling approximately $53,858 at December 31, 2016, expiring through the year 2036. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 places a limitation on the amount of taxable income that can be offset by carryforwards after certain ownership shifts.

The table below summarizes the differences between the tax benefit computed at the statutory federal tax rate and the Company’s net income tax benefit for the years ended December 31:

  2016  2015 
Tax benefit computed at expected statutory rate $(8,619) $(3,570)
State income taxes, net of benefit  -   - 
Permanent differences:        
Meals and entertainment  15   10 
Research and development expenses  115   33 
Share-based compensation  -   60 
Goodwill impairment  232   - 
Other adjustments  191   20 
Increase in valuation allowance  8,066   3,447 
Net income tax benefit $-  $- 

The table below summarizes the differences between the statutory federal rate and the Company’s effective tax rate as follows for the years ended December 31:

  2016  2015 
Federal statutory rate (benefit)  (34.0)%  (34.0)%
State income taxes  -   - 
Permanent differences  (2.2)%  1.2%
Change in valuation allowance  31.8%  32.8%
Effective Tax Rate  0%  0%

The Company has deferred tax assets which are summarized as follows at December 31:

  2016  2015 
Net operating loss carryover $18,311  $8,883 
Depreciable and amortizable assets  1,489   2,178 
Share-based compensation  802    
Accrued liabilities  144   51 
Inventory reserve  115   211 
Allowance for bad debts  47    
Other  4   4 
Less: valuation allowance  (20,912)  (11,327)
Net deferred tax asset $-  $- 

After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has recorded a full valuation allowance at December 31, 2016, due to the uncertainty of realizing the deferred income tax assets. The valuation was increased by approximately $9,585 as a result of $8,066 of differences relating to 2016 operations plus the impact of the Merger and acquisition of Sable of $1,519. The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions and has not received any notices from tax authorities.

F-21

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

NOTE 13: SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”. This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which management disaggregates the Company in making operating decisions. As of December 31, 2016, and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company operates in two segments. The segments are Products (principally consisting of Pioneer Products’ operations consisting of sales of recycled plastic products) and Services (principally consisting of Eco3d’s mapping, modeling and consulting services business plus costs associated with developing Zest Labs and Eco360 solutions). Home office costs are allocated to the two segments based on the relative support provided to those segments.

December 31, 2016 Products  Services  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $9,482  $4,921  $14,403 
Cost of revenues  10,011   1,836   11,847 
Gross profit (loss)  (529)  3,085   2,556 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation, amortization and impairment, and interest and other expense, net  1,279   24,007   25,286 
Depreciation, amortization and impairment  1,799   321   2,120 
Interest and other expense, net  54   326   380 
Net (loss) applicable to common shares  (3,661)  (21,569)  (25,230)
Non-controlling interest income  -   119   119 
Net (loss) – controlling interest $(3,661) $(21,688) $(25,349)
Segmented assets            
Property and equipment, net $2,318  $624  $2,942 
Intangible assets, net $837  $810  $1,647 
Capital expenditures $222  $502  $724 

December 31, 2015 Products  Services  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $5,020  $2,656  $7,676 
Cost of revenues  4,999   947   5,946 
Gross profit  21   1,709   1,730 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation and amortization, and interest expense, net  178   10,014   10,192 
Depreciation and amortization  992   234   1,226 
Interest and other expense, net  10   775   785 
Net (loss) applicable to common shares  (1,159)  (9,314)  (10,473)
Non-controlling interest income  -   29   29 
Net (loss) – controlling interest $(1,159) $(9,343) $(10,502)
Segmented assets            
Property and equipment, net $-  $363  $363 
Intangible assets, net $15  $837  $852 
Capital expenditures $-  $60  $60 

NOTE 14: CONCENTRATIONS

During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company had two major customers comprising 47% of sales and in 2015 the Company had one major customer comprising 65% of sales, all in the products segment. A major customer is defined as a customer that represents 10% or greater of total sales. Additionally, the Company had two customers in the products segment as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 with accounts receivable balances of 20% and 32% of the total accounts receivable. The Company does not believe that risk associated with these customers will have an adverse effect on the business.

In addition, during 2016 and 2015, the Company had two major vendors comprising 52% and 96% of purchases, respectively. A major vendor is defined as a vendor that represents 10% or greater of total purchases. Alternative sources exist such that the risk associated with the two vendors is not expected to have an adverse effect on the Company. Additionally, the Company had two vendors as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 with accounts payable balances of 67% and 63%, respectively, of total accounts payable.

The Company maintained cash balances in excess of the FDIC insured limit in both years. The Company does not consider this risk to be material.

F-22

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

NOTE 15: ACQUISITION OF SABLE

On May 3, 2016,August 23, 2022 the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) bywith Wolf Energy and amongBanner Midstream. Pursuant to the Agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, the Company Pioneer Products, Sable,acquired 51,987,832 shares of the Wolf Energy common stock in exchange for all of the capital stock of Banner Midstream owned by the Company, which represents 100% of the issued and outstanding shares (the “Exchange”). Following the closing of the Agreement which occurred on September 7, 2022, Banner Midstream continues as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wolf Energy. Based on the lower of cost or market, the value of the investment was determined to be $5,328,753. On September 7, 2022, the Exchange was completed, and Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wolf Energy. The Company has determined that as of March 31, 2023, there is no impairment of this investment. 

The Company has determined that this transaction has resulted in BitNile Metaverse having a controlling interest in Wolf Energy as the common stock issued represent approximately 66% of the voting common stock of Wolf Energy common stock outstanding at March 31, 2023. Since Ecoark will be distributing to the Ecoark stockholders a stock dividend to all common and preferred stockholders with a stock dividend date of September 30, 2022, the Company has reflected Wolf Energy, in discontinued operations as the Company intends to hold no shares and thus no voting interest upon the effectiveness of a registration statement for Wolf Energy, and the holder of all of Sable’s membership interests, an entity controlled by a stockholderinvestment has been eliminated in the consolidation.

NOTE 8: INVESTMENT – EARNITY, INC.

As part of the Company.acquisition of BitNile.com, the Company acquired BitNile.com’s 19.9% ownership in Earnity, Inc., a company that aims to democratize access to the broadest array of cryptocurrency assets in a secure, educational, and community-oriented platform to global customers. Earnity provides users with the ability to earn, learn, collect and gift a variety of tokens and portfolios. BitNile Metaverse and Earnity will collaborate on creating secure digital products and incentives to enhance the user’s metaverse experience. In the purchase of BitNile.com, the Company has allocated no value to this investment.

NOTE 9: BITCOIN

Agora commenced its Bitcoin mining operations in November 2021. Through March 31, 2022, Agora mined 0.57 Bitcoins. Agora ceased Bitcoin mining on March 3, 2022. The value of the Bitcoin mined was $26,495 of which $16,351 has been impaired through September 12, 2022. On September 12, 2022, the Company liquidated its Bitcoin holdings into fiat currency (USD), of $12,485. This transaction resulted in a gain on sale of Bitcoin of $2,340. During the year ended March 31, 2023, the Company recognized Bitcoin impairment losses of $9,122.

The following table presents additional information about Agora’s Bitcoin holdings during the year ended March 31, 2023: 

Beginning balance – April 1, 2022 $19,267 
Gain on sale of Bitcoin  2,340 
Bitcoin converted into fiat currency  (12,485)
Bitcoin impairment losses  (9,122)
Ending balance – March 31, 2023 $- 

The following table presents additional information about Agora’s Bitcoin holdings during the year ended March 31, 2022: 

Beginning balance – April 1, 2021 $- 
Gain on sale of Bitcoin  - 
Bitcoin mined  26,495 
Bitcoin impairment losses  (7,228)
Ending balance – March 31, 2022 $19,267 


NOTE 10: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of March 31, 2023 and 2022: 

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
       
Zest Labs freshness hardware, equipment and computer costs $2,915,333  $2,915,333 
Land  125,000   125,000 
Furniture  40,074   - 
Auto – Bitnile.com  220,786   - 
Equipment – Bitnile.com  109,404   - 
Mining technology equipment– Bitcoin  5,639,868   7,065,630 
Auto – Bitcoin  91,132   91,132 
Total property and equipment  9,141,597   10,197,095 
Accumulated depreciation and impairment  (4,709,194)  (2,970,725)
Property and equipment, net $4,432,403  $7,226,370 

As of March 31, 2023, the Company performed an evaluation of the recoverability of these long-lived assets. As a result of the evaluation, there was impairment of fixed assets necessary in the amount of $1,655,969 in September 2022 as the Agora’s focus changed to a power-centric power company from a Bitcoin Mining company. As a result, the Company determined the value of the miners purchased have nominal value.

In September 2022, Agora renegotiated a settlement with one of its vendors, and provided them transformers (in mining technology equipment) valued at $1,425,772 in exchange for a credit against amounts owed to them of $855,000. This resulted in a loss on settlement of $570,772.

Depreciation expense for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 was $82,490 and $231,050, respectively. 

NOTE 11: INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consisted of the following as of March 31, 2023 and 2022: 

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
       
Trademarks $5,097,000  $          - 
Developed technology  1,142,000   - 
Accumulated amortization - trademarks  (28,317)  - 
Accumulated amortization - developed technology  (6,344)  - 
Intangible assets, net $6,204,339  $- 

On March 7, 2023, the Company acquired trademarks and developed technology in the acquisition of BitNile.com. These intangible assets were valued by an independent valuation consultant utilizing various methods including the discounted cash flow and option-pricing methods, and the estimated remaining useful life of these assets was estimated to be fifteen years.

Amortization expense for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 was $34,661 and $0, respectively. 


Amortization expense for the next five years and in the aggregate is as follows:

2024 $415,933 
2025  415,933 
2026  415,933 
2027  415,933 
2028  415,933 
Thereafter  4,124,674 
  $6,204,339 

NOTE 12: POWER DEVELOPMENT COST

Agora had paid $1,000,000 each under two separate agreements for two different land sites to a non-related third party for a total of $2,000,000 in connection with the commencement of Bitstream’s Bitcoin mining operations. The payments represent the fee for securing 48 MW and 30 MW, respectively of utility capacity as defined and agreed by ERCOT West Load Zone in the Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (“Utility”) at the “one-span” tariff rate classification of “6.1.1.1.5 Primary greater than 10kw”. If the Utility is unable to deliver these terms as defined in the facilities extension agreement, the non-related third party is obligated to secure a new location for Bitstream with at least the stated capacity and same rate tariff. The non-related third party secured the 48 MW and 30 MW of available capacity by signing a distribution facilities extension agreement with the Utility and posting the required collateral.  

The $2,000,000 was used to purchase this right to the distribution facilities extension agreement which gives Bitstream immediate access to the 78 MW electric capacity from the Utility.  

Bitstream also reimbursed the utility deposits paid by the non-related third party in connection with these agreements in the amount of $96,000 and $326,500, respectively. The power development fees are deemed non-refundable unless the non-related third party cannot find a suitable location within 6 months. Bitstream and the non-related third party are still negotiating a definitive power agreement.

On August 10, 2022, the Company had $844,708 returned from one of the distribution facilities extension agreements, which is net of $155,292 of fees related to development costs paid to our power broker. The Company determined that the remaining $1,000,000 will be expensed in the year ended March 31, 2023. As a result, no amounts remain as an asset as of March 31, 2023.

NOTE 13: ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following as of March 31, 2023 and 2022: 

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
       
Professional fees and consulting costs $703,869  $346,582 
Vacation and paid time off  77,919   150,032 
Legal fees  171,481   68,723 
Sponsorship  500,000   - 
Compensation  60,343   - 
Interest  61,722   2,223 
Insurance  -   77,176 
Other  68,160   23,923 
Total $1,643,494  $668,659 


NOTE 14: WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

 

The Company issued 2,000 sharescommon stock and warrants in several private placements and two public offerings (“Derivative Warrant Instruments”) and some of these warrants have been classified as liabilities. The Derivative Warrant Instruments have been accounted for utilizing ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging.” The Company has incurred a liability for the estimated fair value of Derivative Warrant Instruments. The estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) in exchange for all of Sable’s membership interests. Sable is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products.

The seller is subject to a lock-up agreement (the “Lock-Up Agreement”) that releases shares fromDerivative Warrant Instruments has been calculated using the Lock-Up Agreement over a period of one year (the “Lock-Up Period”). Under the Lock-Up Agreement, the seller was permitted to sell 33.3%Black-Scholes fair value option-pricing model with key input variables provided by management, as of the Shares received by the seller after the six-month anniversarydate of the closing of the transaction. Thereafter, an additional 33.3% of the Shares shall be released at the end of each subsequent three-month period until the end of the Lock-Up Period.

No cash was paid relating to the acquisition of Sable. Sable operates a polymer manufacturing facility north of Atlanta, Georgia.issuance, with changes in fair value recorded as gains or losses on revaluation in other income (expense).

 

The Company acquiredidentified embedded features in some of the assetswarrant agreements which were classified as a liability. These embedded features included (a) the implicit right for the holders to request that the Company settle the warrants in registered shares. Since maintaining an effective registration of shares is potentially outside the control of the Company, these warrants were classified as liabilities as opposed to equity; (b) included the right for the holders to request that the Company cash settle the warrant instruments from the holder by paying to the holder an amount of cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of the remaining unexercised portion of the Derivative Warrant Instruments on the date of the consummation of a fundamental transaction; and liabilities noted below(c) certain price protections in the agreements. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company treat the whole instrument as liability and record the fair value of the instrument as derivatives as of the inception date of the instrument and to adjust the fair value of the instrument as of each subsequent balance sheet date.   

On November 14, 2020, the Company granted 2,000 two-year warrants exercisable at $232.50 per share in exchange for the 2,000 sharesearly conversion of a portion of the September 24, 2020 warrants. The fair value of the November 14, 2020 warrants was estimated to be $251,497 at inception, and has accounted for the acquisition in accordance with ASC 805. Based on the fair values at the effective datethese warrants have expired as of acquisition the purchase price was recorded as follows:November 14, 2022.

 

Cash $41 
Receivables, net  1,250 
Inventory  759 
Property and equipment  2,822 
Identifiable intangible assets  1,028 
Goodwill  1,264 
Other assets  36 
Accounts payable and other liabilities  (883)
Notes payable and current debt  (2,100)
Long-term debt  (431)
  $3,786 

On December 30, 2020, the Company granted 29,630 two-year warrants, with a strike price of $300.00, in the registered direct offering. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $4,655,299 at inception. During the three months ended March 31, 2021, 5,867 warrants were exercised for $1,760,000, and no shares were exercised during the year ended March 31, 2022 and nine months ended December 31, 2022. The remaining 23,763 warrants have expired as of December 30, 2022.

 

The intangible assets represent customer lists and will be amortized over three years. The goodwill recognized reflects expected synergies from combining operations of Sable andOn December 30, 2020, the Company granted 2,074 two-year warrants to the placement agent as well as intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition including polymer formulas and formulations.additional compensation in connection with the registered direct offering closed December 31, 2020, exercisable at a strike price of $337.50 per share. The goodwill is expectedfair value of those warrants was estimated to be deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill will not be amortized but will be tested annually for impairment. In the fourth quarter$308,205 at inception and these warrants have expired as of 2016 an impairment charge of $682 was recorded. Since the acquisition Sable has recorded $4,435 in revenues (net of intercompany elimination) and a loss of $2,593 that are included in consolidated results.December 30, 2022. 

 

The following table shows pro-forma results forfair value of the year ended December6,667 warrants that remain outstanding from the 8,333 warrants granted on September 24, 2020 have expired on September 24, 2022.

On June 30, 2021, the Company granted 6,667 two-year warrants with a strike price of $300.00 per share, pursuant to a purchase agreement entered into the same day with the warrant holder. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $545,125 at inception, on June 30, 2021 and $0 as of March 31, 20162023.

On August 6, 2021, the Company closed a $20,000,000 registered direct offering. The Company sold 115,942 shares of common stock and 2015 as if115,942 warrants at $172.50 per share. The warrants are exercisable through April 8, 2025. The Company also issued the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2015. These unaudited pro forma results of operations are basedplacement agent 8,116 warrants exercisable at $215,625 per share. Further information on the historical financial statementsoffering and related notescompensation to the placement agent is contained in the prospectus supplement dated August 4, 2021. The fair value of Sable and the Company.

  For the year ended
December 31,
 
  2016  2015 
Revenues $16,249  $19,542 
Net loss attributable to controlling interest $(26,019) $(11,707)
Net loss per share $(0.77) $(0.40)

F-23

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

NOTE 16: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Secured Convertible Promissory Note

In January 2017, the Company established a 10% secured convertible promissory noteinvestor warrants was estimated to be issued in series up to a maximum$11,201,869 at inception and $5,974 as of $5,000 (the “Secured Convertible Promissory Note”). Principal on the series is due in one lump sum payment on or before maturity dates ranging from June 30, 2018 to August 28, 2018. The notes bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum and are due and payable quarterly, in arrears, with the initial interest payments due March 31, 20172023. The fair value of the placement agent warrants was estimated to be $744,530 at inception and continuing thereafter on each successive June 30, September 30, December 31, and$290 as of March 31, of each year during the term of the notes.2023.

 

The Company granted note holdersdetermined our derivative liabilities to be a securityLevel 3 fair value measurement and used the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value as of March 31, 2023 and 2022. The Black-Scholes model requires six basic data inputs: the exercise or strike price, time to expiration, the risk-free interest rate, the current stock price, the estimated volatility of the stock price in the future, and the dividend rate.


Changes to these inputs could produce a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The fair value of each warrant is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following assumptions were used on March 31, 2023 and 2022 and at inception: 

Year Ended
March 31,
2023
Year Ended
March 31,
2022
Inception
Expected term0.25 – 1.85 years0.5 – 2.85 years5.00 years
Expected volatility107 - 110%110 – 113%91% – 107%
Expected dividend yield---
Risk-free interest rate2.98 – 3.88%0.25 – 0.42%1.50% – 2.77%
Market price$5.40 – $39.00$60.00 - $176.70

The Company’s remaining derivative liabilities as of March 31, 2023 and 2022 associated with warrant offerings are as follows. All fully extinguished warrants liabilities are not included in the chart below. 

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
  Inception 
Fair value of 6,667 (originally 8,333) September 24, 2020 warrants $-  $8,354  $1,265,271 
Fair value of 2,000 November 14, 2020 warrants  -   7,695   251,497 
Fair value of 29,630 December 31, 2020 warrants  -   82,436   4,655,299 
Fair value of 2,074 December 31, 2020 warrants  -   5,741   308,205 
Fair value of 6,667 June 30, 2021 warrants  -   60,866   545,125 
Fair value of 115,942 August 6, 2021 warrants  5,974   3,904,575   11,201,869 
Fair value of 8,116 August 6, 2021 warrants  290   248,963   744,530 
  $6,264  $4,318,630     

During the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 the Company recognized changes in the fair value of the derivative liabilities of $(4,312,366) and $(15,386,301), respectively. In addition, the Company recognized $0 and $1,289,655 in expenses related to the warrants granted for the holder’s ratable shareyears ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

Activity related to the warrant derivative liabilities for the year ended March 31, 2023 is as follows:

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2022 $4,318,630 
Issuances of warrants – derivative liabilities  - 
Warrants exchanged for common stock  - 
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities  (4,312,366)
Ending balance as of March 31, 2023 $6,264 

Activity related to the warrant derivative liabilities for the year ended March 31, 2022 is as follows:

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2021 $7,213,407 
Issuances of warrants – derivative liabilities  12,491,524 
Warrants exchanged for common stock  - 
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities  (15,386,301)
Ending balance as of March 31, 2022 $4,318,630 


NOTE 15: LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt included in continuing operations consisted of the series notesfollowing as of March 31, 2023 and 2022. All debt instruments repaid during the year ended March 31, 2022 are not included in the Company’s ownership interest in Eco3d, LLCbelow chart and the chart only reflects those instruments that had a balance owed as collateral. of these dates. 

  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
       
Credit facility -Trend Discovery SPV 1, LLC (a) $291,036  $595,855 
Auto loan – Ford (b)  68,114   80,324 
Auto loan – Cadillac (c)  170,222   - 
Total long-term debt  529,372   676,179 
Less: current portion  (323,818)  (608,377)
Long-term debt, net of current portion $205,554  $67,802 

(a)On December 28, 2018, the Company entered into a $10,000,000 credit facility that includes a loan and security agreement (the “Agreement”) where the lender agreed to make one or more loans to the Company, and the Company may make a request for a loan or loans from the lender, subject to the terms and conditions. The Company is required to pay interest biannually on the outstanding principal amount of each loan calculated at an annual rate of 12%. The loans are evidenced by demand notes executed by the Company. The Company is able to request draws from the lender up to $1,000,000 with a cap of $10,000,000. In the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company borrowed $595,855, which includes $25,855 in commitment fees, with the balance of $570,000 being deposited directly into the Company. In the year ended March 31, 2023, the Company borrowed $505,181, which includes $17,681 in commitment fees, with the balance of $487,500 being deposited directly into the Company, and repaid $810,000 in the year ended March 31, 2023. Interest incurred for the year ended March 31, 2023 was $59,499 and accrued as of March 31, 2023 was $61,722. With the sale of Trend Holdings, we can no longer access this line of credit.

(b)On February 16, 2022, entered into long-term secured note payable for $80,324 for a service truck maturing February 13, 2028. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 5.79% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2023.

(c)On March 6, 2023 in the acquisition of Bitnile.com, the Company assumed an auto loan for a Cadillac in the amount of $170,222. The loan bears interest at 14.18% and matures December 2028.

The note holders havefollowing is a list of maturities as of March 31:

2024 $323,818 
2025  36,668 
2026  41,082 
2027  46,104 
2028  50,497 
Thereafter  31,203 
  $529,372 

Interest expense on long-term debt during the right at the holders’ optionyears ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 are $64,598 and $11,754, respectively.

NOTE 16: NOTES PAYABLE - RELATED PARTIES

A Board member advanced $577,500 to convert all or any portion of the principal amount at a conversion rate per share which range from $4.15 to $7.10 per share. In February 2017, the Company amendedthrough August 8, 2021, under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note wherebyterms of notes payable that bears interest at rates ranging between 10% and 15% interest per annum. On August 9, 2021, the collateralCompany repaid the entire $577,500 to the Board member with accrued interest of $42,535. Interest expense on the notes was changed fromfor the ownership interest in Eco3d, LLC to the ownership interest in Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC. In February 2017, the Company amended the Secured Convertible Promissory Note whereby certain holders received a warrant to purchase 10 shares of common stock for every $100 principal amount if the holder converts the note on or beforeyear ended March 31, 2017. Through March 10, 2017 series notes totaling $4,300 have been purchased.2022 was $25,213.

 

In February 2017, anAn officer of the Company purchased $100advanced $116,000 and was repaid this amount during the year ended March 31, 2022, and $25,000 was advanced and repaid during the year ended March 31, 2022 from an officer of Agora.

In the series notes, an independent director onyear ended March 31, 2023, the Company’s BoardChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer advanced a significant shareholder purchased $500total of the series notes,$961,000 of which was repaid; and a director on the Company’s Board andan officer of Agora advanced $25,000 which was fully repaid in the Company purchased $100 ofsame period. These were short-term advances and no interest was charged as the series notes. The officers and directors declined the warrants.amounts were outstanding for just a few weeks.

 

In the acquisition of Bitnile.com (see Note 3), the Company assumed $4,404,350 in advances to the former parent of Bitnile.com. In the period March 6, 2023 through March 31, 2023, an additional $1,378,293 was advanced to Bitnile.com and $5,782,643 remains outstanding at March 31, 2023.

F-24


 

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015NOTE 17: PREFERRED STOCK

 

Securities Purchase AgreementBitNile Metaverse Series A

 

On January 13, 2017,June 8, 2022, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement effective January 11, 2017 related(the “Agreement”) with Ault Lending, LLC (formerly Digital Power Lending, LLC), a California limited liability company (the “Purchaser”), pursuant to which the issuance and saleCompany sold the Purchaser 1,200 shares of up to $5,000 inSeries A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “BitNile Metaverse Series A”), 3,429 shares of common stock (the “Commitment Shares”) and a warrant to purchase shares of common stock (the “Warrant,” and together with the BitNile Metaverse Series A and the Commitment Shares, the “Securities”) for a total original purchase price of $12,000,000. The Purchaser is a subsidiary of Ault Alliance, Inc. [NYSE American: AULT]. The Company determined that the classification of the BitNile Metaverse Series A was Mezzanine Equity as the option to convert the shares belongs to the Purchaser. A description of the material transaction components are as follows:

Conversion Rights

Prior to the November 2022 amendment described below, each share of BitNile Metaverse Series A had a stated value of $10,000 and were convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $63.00 per share, subject to customary adjustment provisions. The holder’s conversion of the BitNile Metaverse Series A was subject to a beneficial ownership limitation of 19.9% of the issued and outstanding common stock as of any conversion date of the BitNile Metaverse Series A, unless and until the Company obtains stockholder and The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) approval for the conversion of more than that amount, in order to comply with Nasdaq Rules. Stockholder approval was obtained on September 9, 2022. In addition, the conversion rights in general did not become effective until July 23, 2022, which is one day after the record date for the stockholders meeting seeking such stockholder approval at the September 9, 2022 meeting.  The shares of BitNile Metaverse Series A as amended are also subject to a 4.99% beneficial ownership limitation, which may be increased to up to 9.9% by the holder by giving 61 days’ notice to the Company.

On November 28, 2022, the Company, following an investor.agreement with the Purchaser, the Company amended the Certificate of Designations of Rights, Preferences and Limitations (the “Certificate”) of the Ecoark Series A previously issued to the Purchaser to: (i) increase the stated value of the BitNile Metaverse Series A from $10,000 to $10,833.33; (ii) provide for the dividends payable under the BitNile Metaverse Series A to be payable in common stock rather than cash effective November 1, 2022, and (iii) reduce the conversion price of the Ecoark Series A from $63.00 to the lesser of (a) $30.00 or (b) the higher of (1) 80% of the 10-day daily volume weighted average price, or (2) $7.50. The amendment on November 28, 2022 constituted a modification to the classification of the Series A from mezzanine equity to liability. The Company determined in accordance with ASC 470-50-40, that the amendment would be accounted for as a debt modification as opposed to a debt extinguishment as the amendment did not meet the 10% threshold when comparing the present value of the remaining cash flows to the value to the original terms of the Series A. As a result of this modification, the Company recognized a debt modification expense of $879,368. Upon reclassification to preferred stock liability, the Company analyzed the terms and determined that the preferred stock liability was considered a derivative liability and measured the derivative liability at inception (November 28, 2022). This measurement resulted in a gain of $2,878,345.

As described in Note 19. “Commitments and Contingencies”, Nasdaq is alleging that the November 2022 amendment to the Series A violated its voting and stockholder approval requirements, and we expect it may do so with regard to the recent BitNile.com transaction, although the Company plans to seek stockholder approval for both transactions and make any modifications Nasdaq requires. See “Risk Factors” contained in this Annual Report. 

Changes to these inputs could produce a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The fair value of the preferred stock liability is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following assumptions were used for the year ended March 31, 2023, and at inception: 

March 31,
2023
Inception
Expected term1.66 – 2.00 years2.00 years
Expected volatility108 - 110%108%
Expected dividend yield--
Risk-free interest rate3.48 – 3.88%3.69%
Market price$3.60 – $22.80$22.80


Negative Covenants and Approval Rights

The BitNile Metaverse Series A Certificate of Designation (the “Certificate”) subjects the Company to negative covenants restricting its ability to take certain actions without prior approval from the holder(s) of a majority of the outstanding shares of BitNile Metaverse Series A for as long as the holder(s) continue to hold at least 25% (or such higher percentage as set forth in the Certificate (as defined below)) of the BitNile Metaverse Series A shares issued on the closing date under the Agreement. These restrictive covenants include the following actions by the Company, subject to certain exceptions and limitations:

(i)payment or declaration of any dividend (other than pursuant to the BitNile Metaverse Series A Certificate);

(ii)investment in, purchase or acquisition of any assets or capital stock of any entity for an amount that exceeds $100,000 in any one transaction or $250,000, in the aggregate;

(iii)issuance of any shares of common stock or other securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of common stock;

(iv)incurrence of indebtedness, liens, or guaranty obligations, in an aggregate amount in excess of $50,000 in any individual transaction or $100,000 in the aggregate with customary exceptions.

(v)sale, lease, transfer or disposal of any of its properties having a value calculated in accordance with GAAP of more than $50,000;

(vi)increase in any manner the compensation or fringe benefits of any of its directors, officers, employees; and

(vii)merger or consolidation with, or purchase a substantial portion of the assets of, or by any other manner the acquisition or combination with any business or entity.

The above and other negative covenants in the Series A Certificate do not apply to a reverse merger with an entity with securities quoted on a market operated by OTC Markets or listed on a national securities exchange.  

Warrant

Prior to its cancellation, the Warrant, as amended, provided the Purchaser or its assignees (the “Holder”) with the right to purchase agreement is a number of shares of common stock as would enable the holder together with its affiliates to beneficially own 49% of the Company’s common stock, calculated on a fully diluted basis, at an exercise price of $0.03 per share, including the Commitment Shares and Conversion Shares unless sold. Subject to stockholder approval, the Warrant was to vest and become exercisable into shares of the Company’s stock if as of June 8, 2024: (i) the Company had failed to complete the distributions to the Company’s security holders or to any other subsidiary of the Company’s equity ownership of its three principal subsidiaries: Agora, Banner Midstream and Zest Labs (or their principal subsidiaries) (the “Distributions”), and/or (ii) the Holder together with its affiliates does not beneficially own at least 50% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Provided, the Company must retain 20% of its common stock of Agora. The Warrant was to be exercised on a cashless basis and expire on June 8, 2027.

On November 14, 2022, the Company and the warrant holder canceled the warrant which was originally issued to the holder on June 8, 2022, as subsequently amended and restated, in exchange for $100 as the Company has substantially met the conditions under Section 1(a) of the warrant, therefore, the Company did not compute any derivative liability on the warrants.


Registration Rights

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company has agreed to register the sale by the Purchaser of up to 174,882 shares of common stock, representing the Commitment Shares issued at the closing plus 171,453 of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the BitNile Metaverse Series A. This amount equals 19.9% of the Company’s outstanding common stock immediately prior to the closing. The Company registered the sale by filing a prospectus supplement pursuant to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3 registration statement(File No. 333-249532), originally filed with the SEC on August 17, 2016.October 16, 2020, as amended, which became effective on December 29, 2020, and the base prospectus included therein. On January 23, 2023, the Purchaser agreed to reduce its secondary offering of shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A by $3,500,000. See Note 18 “Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit).”

 

The purchase date is immediately followingvalue of the dayCommitment Shares of $193,416 were considered issuance costs and have been reflected in the total for Mezzanine Equity of $11,806,584. During the year ended March 31, 2023, a total of 318 shares of the Series A have been converted into 80,555 shares of common stock and 58.615 shares of the Series A have been redeemed pursuant to an agreement with the holder to have the Company pay a liability on whichtheir behalf. As of March 31, 2023, a total of 823.385 shares of Series A are issued and outstanding. In addition, the investor receives a regular purchase notice provided thatCompany amortized $34,609 in discount on the investor has received the notice by 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time or the immediately succeeding business day if the investor received the notice after 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on a trading day. The pricing period on each securities purchase is the five consecutive days immediatelypreferred stock, prior to the purchase notice.reclassification to the preferred stock liability on November 22, 2022. Upon this reclassification, the balance of unamortized discount of $166,350, was expensed as part of the debt modification expense.

 

The purchase pricedescription above is not a substitute for reviewing the average volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”)full text of the purchase shares duringreferenced documents, which were attached as exhibits to the pricing period multiplied by (i) 77% ifCompany’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the priceSEC on June 9, 2022, and the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 15, 2022 when we filed the amended and restated warrant, and the aforementioned amendment filed on November 29, 2022.

Preferred Stock Derivative Liability

BitNile Metaverse Series A

As discussed herein, the Company determined that the Series A upon the amendment on November 28, 2022, constituted a derivative liability under ASC 815. As a result of this classification, the Company determined that on November 28, 2022 (inception), the value of the regular purchase request is 100% or less than or equal toderivative liability was $7,218,319.

On December 9, 2022, the average trailing ten day trading volumeSeries A holder converted 50 shares of Series A into 38,015 common shares that resulted in a loss on the principal market multiplied by the average VWAP in the pricing period, or (ii) 72% if the priceconversion of the regular purchase request is greater than 100% but less than 150% of the average or less than or equal to the average trailing ten day trading volume on the principal market multiplied by the average VWAP in the pricing period, or (iii) 67% if the price of the regular purchase request is greater than 150% but less than 200% of the average trailing tend day trading volume multiplied by the average VWAP in the pricing period. An expense commission totaling 10% of the proceeds is due on each purchase.$3,923.

 

The investor made an initial purchasederivative liability for the preferred stock was remeasured at March 31, 2023 and is valued at $1,660,202, resulting in a gain of 125 shares on January 13, 2017 for an aggregate consideration of $469, less expense commission of $47, providing net proceeds of $422.$5,016,450 in the change in fair value.

 

The investor madeDuring the year ended March 31, 2023 the Company recognized changes in the fair value of the derivative liabilities related to the Series A of $(5,016,450). In addition, during March 2023, the Company advanced $635,000 to a purchasethird-party related to an obligation by the Series A Preferred Stock shareholder and this amount will be reflected as a redemption upon the dividend that will be paid to the Company’s shareholders of 145 shares on Januaryrecord as of September 30, 20172022 for an aggregate consideration of $540, less expense commission of $54, providing net proceeds of $486.the White River Energy Corp and Wolf Energy Services Corp. divestitures.

 

The investor made a purchase of 61 shares on February 13, 2017Activity related to the preferred stock derivative liabilities for an aggregate consideration of $200, less expense commission of $20, providing net proceeds of $180.the year ended March 31, 2023 is as follows:

 

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2022 $- 
Reclassification of mezzanine equity to preferred stock liability  10,096,664 
Gain on fair value at inception  (2,878,345)
Conversion of preferred stock for common stock  (541,667)
Advances to third-party that will be considered redemption of Series A  (635,000)
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liabilities  (5,016,450)
Ending balance as of March 31, 2023 $1,025,202 


Securities Purchase Agreement – MayBitNile Metaverse Series B and MetzgerC

 

OnAs discussed in Note 3, on February 28, 2017,8, 2023, the Company entered into the SEA by and among Ault, a Securities Purchasesignificant shareholder, the owner of approximately 86% of BitNile.com, and the Minority Stockholders. The SEA provides that, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, the Company will acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of Bitnile.com as well as the common stock of Earnity, Inc. beneficially owned by BitNile.com (which represents approximately 19.9% of the outstanding common stock of Earnity, Inc. as of the date of the SEA) which has no value, in exchange for the following: (i) 8,637.5 shares of Series B, and (ii) 1,362.5 shares of Series C. The Series B and the Series C, the terms of which are summarized in more detail below, each have a stated value of $10,000 per share (the “Stated Value”), for a combined stated value of $100,000,000, and subject to adjustment are convertible into a total of up to 13,333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock, which represent approximately 92.4% of the Company outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis. The Company has independently valued the Series B and Series C as of the date of acquisition. The combined value of the shares issued to Ault was $53,913,000 using a blended fair value of the discounted cash flow method and option pricing method.

The terms of the Series B and Series C as set forth in the Certificates of Designations of the Rights, Preferences and Limitations of each such series of Preferred Stock (each, a “Certificate,” and together the “Certificates”) are essentially identical except the Series B is super voting and must approve any modification of various negative covenants and certain other corporate actions as more particularly described below.

Pursuant to the Series B Certificate, each share of Series B is convertible into a number of shares of the Company’s common stock determined by dividing the Stated Value by $7.50, or 1,333 shares of common stock. The conversion price is subject to certain adjustments, including potential downward adjustment if the Company closes a qualified financing resulting in at least $25,000,000 in gross proceeds at a price per share that is lower than the conversion price. The Series B holders are entitled to receive dividends at a rate of 5% of the Stated Value per annum from issuance until February 7, 2033 (the “Dividend Term”). During the first two years of the Dividend Term, dividends will be payable in additional shares of Series B rather than cash, and thereafter dividends will be payable in either additional shares of Series B or cash as each holder may elect. If the Company fails to make a dividend payment as required by the Series B Certificate, the dividend rate will be increased to 12% for as long as such default remains ongoing and uncured. Each share of Series B also has an $11,000 liquidation preference in the event of a liquidation, change of control event, dissolution or winding up of the Company, and ranks senior to all other capital stock of the Company with respect thereto other than the Series C with which the Series B shares equal ranking. Each share of Series B is entitled to vote with the Company’s common stock at a rate of 300 votes per share of common stock into which the Series B is convertible.

In addition, for as long as at least 25% of the shares of Series B remain outstanding, Ault (and any transferees) must consent rights with respect to certain corporate events, including reclassifications, fundamental transactions, stock redemptions or repurchases, increases in the number of directors, and declarations or payment of dividends, and further the Company is subject to certain negative covenants, including covenants against issuing additional shares of capital stock or derivative securities, incurring indebtedness, engaging in related party transactions, selling of properties having a value of over $50,000, altering the number of directors, and discontinuing the business of any subsidiary, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

The terms, rights, preferences and limitations of the Series C are substantially the same as those of the Series B, except that the Series B holds certain additional negative covenant and consent rights, and Series C holders vote with the Company’s common stock on an as-converted basis. The Company is required to maintain a reserve of authorized and unissued shares of common stock equal to 200% of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, which is initially 26,666,667 shares.

Pending stockholder approval of the transaction, the Series B and the Series C combined are subject to a 19.9% beneficial ownership limitation. That limitation includes shares of Series A issued to Ault on June 8, 2022 and any common stock held by Ault. Certain other rights are subject to stockholder approval as described below. The SEA provides that the Company will seek stockholder approval following the closing. The entire transaction is subject to compliance with Nasdaq Rules and the Series B and Series C Certificates each contain a savings clause that nothing shall violate such Rules. Nasdaq may nonetheless disregard the savings clause.


Under the SEA, effective at the closing Ault is entitled to appoint three of the Company’s directors, and following receipt of approval from the Company’s stockholders, a majority of the Company’s directors. The SEA also provides the holders of Preferred Stock with most favored nations rights in the event the Company offers securities with more favorable terms than the Preferred Stock for as long as the Preferred Stock remains outstanding. Under the SEA, while any Preferred Stock is outstanding, the Company is prohibited from redeeming or declaring or paying dividends on outstanding securities other than the Preferred Stock. Further, the SEA prohibits the Company from issuing or amending securities at a price per share below the conversion price of the Preferred Stock, or to engage in variable rate transactions, for a period of 12 months following the closing.

The SEA further provides that following the closing the Company will prepare and distribute a proxy statement and hold a meeting of its stockholders to approve each of the following: (i) the SEA and the transactions contemplated thereby, (ii) a ratification of the Third Certificate Designations of Rights, Preferences, and Limitations of the Series A, (iii) a reverse stock split with a range of between 1-for 2 and 1-for-20, (iv) a change in the Company’s name to BitNile.com, Inc., (v) an increase of the Company’s authorized common stock to 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock; and (vi) any other proposals to which the Parties shall mutually agree. In addition, pursuant to the SEA the Company agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to effect its previously announce spin-offs of the common stock of Wolf Energy and White River held by or issuable to the Company, use its best efforts to complete one or more financings resulting in total gross proceeds of $100,000,000 on terms acceptable to Ault, and (financially support the ongoing Zest Labs litigation. The holders of the Preferred Stock will not participate in the aforementioned spin-offs and distribution. In connection with the SEA, the Company and Ault also agreed that the net litigation proceeds from the Zest Labs litigation that was ongoing as of November 15, 2022 would be held in a trust for the benefit of the Company’s stockholders of record as of such date.

In connection with the SEA, the Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Ault and the Minority Shareholders pursuant to which the Company agreed to file a registration statement on Form S-3 or Form S-1 with the SEC registering the resale by the holders of the Preferred Stock and/or the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, to be initially filed within 15 days of the closing, and to use its best efforts to cause such registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC within 45 days thereafter, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

The SEA contains certain representations and warranties made by each of the Company, Ault and the Minority Shareholders. Upon the closing, which is subject to the closing conditions set forth in the SEA, including among other conditions the parties obtaining a fairness opinion from a national independent valuation firm and satisfactory completion of due diligence by each of the Company and Ault, BitNile.com will continue as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. BitNile.com’s principal business entails the development and operation of a metaverse platform, the beta for which launched on March 1, 2023. This transaction closed on March 7, 2023.

The Company determined that the Series B and Series C, constituted a derivative liability under ASC 815 on the date of inception March 7, 2023. As a result of this classification, the Company determined that on March 7, 2023 (inception), the value of the derivative liability was $42,426,069.

The derivative liability for the preferred stock Series B and Series C was remeasured at March 31, 2023 and is valued at $18,830,760 resulting in a gain of $23,595,309 in the change in fair value.

Activity related to the issuancepreferred stock derivative liabilities for the Series B and saleSeries C for the year ended March 31, 2023 is as follows:

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2022 $- 
Recognition of derivative liability at inception  53,913,000 
Gain on fair value at inception  (11,486,931)
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivative liabilities  (23,595,309)
Ending balance as of March 31, 2023 $18,830,760 


NOTE 18: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

On July 26, 2022, the Company filed a Definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 2022 Annual Meeting of upthe Stockholders, being held virtually at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 9, 2022, at which the stockholders of the Company approved the following proposals:

(1)Approve for purposes of complying with Listing Rule 5635 of the Nasdaq Stock Market, the issuance by the Company of shares of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the private placement financing transaction pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 8, 2022 between the Company and Ault Lending, LLC, formerly known as Digital Power Lending, LLC, a California limited liability company, without giving effect to any beneficial ownership limitations contained therein;

(2)Approve an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of Common Stock the Company is authorized to issue from 1,333,333 shares to 3,333,333 shares;

(3)Elect four members to the Company’s Board of Directors for a one-year term expiring at the next annual meeting of stockholders;

(4)Ratify the selection of RBSM LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2023; and

(5)Approve the adjournment of the Annual Meeting to a later date or time, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies if, based upon the tabulated vote at the time of the Annual Meeting, there are not sufficient votes to approve any of the other proposals before the Annual Meeting.

BitNile Metaverse Preferred Stock

As of March 31, 2022, there were no shares of any series of preferred stock issued and outstanding. On June 8, 2022, as noted in Note 17, “Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock”, the Company issued 1,200 shares of Series A, and as of March 31, 2023, there are 882 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding as 318 shares were converted into common stock in the year ended March 31, 2023.

As of March 31, 2023, the Company has issued Series B and Series C as noted in Note 17 and has 8,637.5 and 1,362.5 shares of Series B and C, respectively, outstanding, which were issued March 7, 2023.

BitNile Metaverse Common Stock

The Company is authorized to 1,100issue 3,333,333 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 which followed stockholder approval on September 9, 2022. On May 4, 2023, the Company amended their Certificate of Incorporation for a 1-for-30 reverse stock split. The Company also reduced their authorized shares on a 1-for-30 basis going from 100,000,000 authorized shares down to 3,333,333 authorized shares. All share and per share figures are reflected on a post-split basis herein. As of March 31, 2023, the Company has 72,617 shares of common stock held by Randy May, CEO,in escrow (valued at $251,835) for the At-the-Market agreement as discussed below. These shares are not included in our issued and Gary Metzger,outstanding common stock reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit), nor are they included in our calculation of earnings (loss) per share.

In the three months ended June 30, 2021, the Company issued 3,827 shares of common stock which had been accrued for at March 31, 2021 in consulting fees under a contract entered into February 2, 2021. In addition, the Company issued 675 shares of common stock for the exercise of stock options.

In the three months ended September 30, 2021, the Company issued 1,500 shares of common stock for services, and 115,942 shares issued in a registered direct offering.

In the three months ended December 31, 2021 and the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Company did not issue any shares of common stock.

In the three months ended June 30, 2022, the Company issued 3,429 shares of common stock which were the commitment shares in the Ault transaction as discussed in Note 17.


In the three months ended September 30, 2022, the Company issued 42,540 shares of common stock in conversion of 268 shares of Series A. In addition, the Company issued 18,333 shares (including the 3,903 shares held as treasury stock, for a net 14,430 common shares) as settlement with a Trend Ventures investor. The Company has expensed the value of $1,045,000 ($57.00 per share) as a settlement expense.

In the three months ended December 31, 2022, the Company issued 38,015 shares of common stock in conversion of 50 shares of Series A and 4,661 shares of common stock in payment of the Series A dividend for November 2022. The Company accrued the December 2022 dividend of 13,728 shares with a value of $103,934, which were issued January 5, 2023.

On January 24, 2023, the Company entered into an independent director onAt-The-Market (“ATM”) Issuance Sales Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Ascendiant Capital Markets, LLC (“Ascendiant”), pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell from time to time, through Ascendiant, shares of the Company’s Board and a significant shareholder.common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), with offering proceeds of up to $3,500,000. The purchase agreement is pursuantATM was terminated on June 16, 2023 upon the achievement of the raising of approximately $3,500,000.

Sales of the Shares, if any, may be made by any method permitted by law deemed to be an “at-the-market” offering as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), including without limitation sales made directly on or through The Nasdaq Capital Market, the trading market for the Company’s Form S-3 registration statement filedcommon stock, on August 17, 2016. The selling securityholders may sellany other existing trading market in the United States for the Company’s common stock, to or distribute the securities includedthrough a market maker, directly to Ascendiant as principal for its account in this prospectus supplement through underwriters, through agents, to dealers, in privatenegotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to thesuch prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, in block trades, or at negotiated prices. The Companythrough a combination of any such methods of sale. Ascendiant will not receive anyuse commercially reasonable efforts to sell on the Company’s behalf all of the Shares requested to be sold by the Company, consistent with its normal trading and sales practices, subject to the terms of the Agreement. Under the Agreement, Ascendiant will be entitled to compensation of 3% of the gross proceeds from the sales of the Common Stock made byShares sold under the selling securityholders.

Securities Purchase Agreement – Institutional Funds

On March 14, 2017,Agreement. The Company also agreed to reimburse Ascendiant for certain specified expenses, including the Company completed a reserved private placement agreement entered into on March 13, 2017 relatedfees and disbursements of its legal counsel, in an amount not to the issuance and sale of 2,000 shares of common stock for $8,000 to two institutional funds which each invested $4,000 in the transaction at $4.00 per share.  The purchase agreement is pursuant to the Company’s Form S-3 registration statement filed on August 17, 2016.  The purchasers also received warrants to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock equal to 50% of the purchaser’s shares for $5.00 forexceed $30,000 as well as up to 5 years from$2,500 for each quarterly and annual bring-down while the date the transaction completed.

Board AppointmentsAgreement is ongoing.

 

On January 13, 2017, Yash Puri resigned as a member23, 2023, the Series A holder agreed to reduce its secondary offering of shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the Board of Directors and as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofSeries A by $3,500,000 in connection with the Company. Mr. Puri will remain involved in the Company as a part-time employee until June 30, 2017 and then continue as a consultant.

On January 19, 2017, the Company appointed Peter Mehring, President of Zest Labs, and Troy Richards, the Company’s Chief Administrative Officer, to the Company’s Board of Directors to fill two vacancies. After these appointments, there were seven directors on the Company’s Board of Directors, including four independent directors pursuant to Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined by NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2).

On January 19, 2017, the Company appointed Jay Oliphant, the Company’s Corporate Controller, to serve as the Company’s Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. Mr. Oliphant, 58, served as Controller for Ecoark since January 2016 and then as Corporate Controller for the Company since April 2016.

On January 19, 2017, the Company appointed Jay Puchir as the Company’s Treasurer and Secretary. Mr. Puchir, 41, joined the Company in December 2016.

On March 13, 2017, the Company appointed Randy May, CEO, as President in place of Ashok Sood.

F-25

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Fiscal Year-End Change

On January 19, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a change in the fiscal year of the Company from a fiscal year ending on December 31 to a fiscal year ending on March 31 as permitted by the Company’s bylaws.

Stock Awards – 2013 Holdings Plan

On January 10, 2017, the Company issued 17 shares of common stock to independent directors that were fully vested on December 31, 2016. A total of $25 in shares were issued to each independent director for their participation on the Company’s Board for the most recent quarter ended December 31, 2016. Each independent director was issued 4 shares at $5.86 per share which was the average closing share price of the Company’s stock for the quarter ended December 31, 2016.ATM offering.

 

The Company engaged the services of consultants to assist it with efforts to raise capital, identify potential acquisitions, and perform acquisition due diligence. In addition to cash compensation for those services the Company granted 550 shares of common stock to the consultants, of which 525 were fully vested on February 20, 2017, and the remaining 25 vest on March 31, 2017. The Company has issued 525 of these shares in 2017. The value of the 550 shares is $2,498.

In 2017, the Company has granted 200 shares to employees.

F-26

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, including ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to management (including the principal executive and financial officers) as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive and financial officers have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.

Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for our Company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of our CompanyShares are being made only in accordance with authorizations of managementoffered and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our Company's assets that could havesold pursuant to a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016 based on those criteria.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, which has audited the financial statements included in this annual report, has also issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. This report appears below.

16

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control— Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and our report dated March 15, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion.

KBL, LLP

/s/ KBL, LLP

New York, NY

March 15, 2017

17

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company became subject to additional requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 subsequent to June 30, 2016. Management devoted significant effort to improving internal controls over financial reporting throughout 2016, and evaluated the changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2016. We believe that significant improvements were implemented during that quarter which improved internal controls. Those improvements included significant additions to approval workflows and greater segregation of duties in the Company’s use of its cloud-based financial accounting systems, a more clearly documented delegation of authority approved by the board of directors and greater attention to disclosure controls and procedures.

Item 9B. Other Information

Nothing to report.

18

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

We have a code of ethics as defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K, which code applies to all of our directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is available free of charge on our website at www.ecoarkusa.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, any provision of our code of ethics by posting such amendment or waiver on our website.

In accordance with General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the remaining information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which we expect to fileprospectus supplement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under(the “SEC”) on January 24, 2023 and the Exchange Actaccompanying base prospectus which is part of the Company’s effective Registration Statement on or before May 1, 2017.Form S-3 (File No. 333-249532) (the “Registration Statement”). As of June 16, 2023, the Company had received approximately $3,500,000 in proceeds, of which 344,050 shares for net proceeds of $1,715,439 were issued through March 31, 2023.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation.The Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants customary for the transactions of this kind.

 

In accordancethe three months ended March 31, 2023, the Company issued 53,412 shares of common stock in payment of the Series A dividend for the December 2022, January 2023, February 2023 and March 2023 months with General Instruction G(3)a value of Form 10-K, the information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement.$400,794 and issued 4,492 shares of common stock for vested restricted stock units.

 

Item 12. Security OwnershipAs of Certain Beneficial OwnersMarch 31, 2023 and Management2022, 1,383,832 and Related Stockholder Matters.878,803 shares of common stock were issued, respectively.

 

ExceptAgora Common Stock

Agora is authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001. On September 22, 2021, the Company purchased 100 shares of Agora for $10.

On October 1, 2021, the Company purchased 41,671,121 shares of Agora common stock for $4,167,112 which Agora used to purchase equipment to commence the Bitstream operations. 


In addition, between October 1 and December 7, 2021, Agora issued 4,600,000 restricted common shares to its management, non-employee directors, employees and advisors. After issuance of these shares, Ecoark controls approximately 90% of Agora. The future stock-based compensation related to these shares that will be measured consists of $12,166,680 over a three-year period in service-based grants ($9,611,145 in year one, $1,861,096 in year two, and $694,436 in year 3) and $10,833,320 in performance-based grants ($5,416,660 for the deployment of 20 MW in the State of Texas, and $5,416,660 for the deployment of 40 MW in the State of Texas) for a total of $23,000,000. These restricted common shares were measured pursuant to ASC 718-10-50 at an estimated value per share of $5.00 and consist of both service-based and performance-based criteria.

On August 7, 2022, Agora issued 400,000 shares of common stock to its management, non-employee directors, employees and advisors. After issuance of these shares, Ecoark controls approximately 89% of Agora. The future stock-based compensation related to these shares that will be measured consists of $2,000,000 ranging from immediate vesting through the three-year anniversary in service-based grants. These restricted common shares were measured pursuant to ASC 718-10-50 at an estimated value per share of $5.00 and consist of service-based criteria only.

Of the 5,000,000 restricted shares of common stock — 2,833,336 shares of restricted stock are considered service grants and 2,166,664 are considered performance grants.

The performance grants vest as set forth below,follows: 1,083,332 restricted common shares upon Agora deploying a 20 MW power contract in Texas; and 1,083,332 restricted common shares upon the Company deploying a 40 MW power contract in Texas. As of December 31, 2022, none of the performance criteria are probable as no contracts have been signed as the proper funding has not been secured, therefore no compensation expense is recognized in accordance with General Instruction G(3)ASC 718-10-25-20 related to the performance grants. On April 12, 2022, Agora upon board of Form 10-K,director approval accelerated the information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement.vesting of 250,000 restricted shares for deploying a 20 MW power contract in Texas; and 250,000 restricted shares for deploying a 40 MW power contract in Texas with Agora’s former Chief Financial Officer. All remaining performance grants remain unvested. 

 

Securities AuthorizedThe Company recognized $9,631,406 in stock-based compensation for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

the year ended March 31, 2023, which represented $6,506,406 in service grants, and $3,125,000 in the accelerated vesting of the former CFO’s grants ($625,000 in service-based grants and $2,500,000 in performance grants). The unrecognized stock-based compensation expense as of March 31, 2023 is $8,333,320 in performance based grants and $2,351,518 in service based grants for a total of $10,684,838.

 

The Company accounts for stock-based payments in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation — Stock OptionsCompensation (“ASC 718”). During the year ended March 31, 2022, in addition to the value measured by the 4,600,000 restricted stock grants, stock-based compensation consists primarily of RSUs granted to a Company employee while employed by Ecoark Holdings. The Company measures compensation expense for RSUs based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The grant date fair value is based on the closing market price of Ecoark Inc.

On February 16, 2013,Holdings’ common stock on the Boarddate of Directors of Ecoark approved the Ecoark Inc. 2013 Stock Option Plan (the “Ecoark Plan”). The purposes of the Ecoark Plan were to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants, and to promote the success of the business. The Ecoark Plan was expected to contribute to the attainment of these objectives by offering employees, directors and consultants the opportunity to acquire stock ownership interests in Ecoark, and to thereby provide them with incentives to put forth maximum efforts for the success of Ecoark.grant.

 

2013 Ecoark Holdings PlanShare-based Compensation Expense

Share-based compensation for employees is included in salaries and salary related costs and directors and services are included in professional fees and consulting in the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.

 

TheShare-based compensation for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 for stock options and RSUs granted under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan and 2017 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan and non-qualified stock options were $567,188 and $2,006,575, respectively.

There is $340,731 in share-based compensation accrued as of Ecoark Holdings (previously MSC) (the “Holdings Plan”)March 31, 2023 for BitNile Metaverse and $237,499 accrued in Agora for a total of $578,230.

The Company recorded $621,912 in stock-based compensation for 133,333 warrants that were granted to two consultants of Bitnile.com.


In order to have sufficient authorized capital to raise the $20,000,000, on August 4, 2021, a then officer and director of the Company agreed to cancel stock options in exchange for a lesser number of restricted stock units, subject to future vesting. In accordance with the restricted stock agreement, the director was registeredgranted 9,075 RSUs that vest over 12 quarterly increments, in exchange for cancelling 22,417 stock options. In addition, on February 7, 2013. October 6, 2021, this officer and director received 2,133 additional RSUs. The expense related to the modification of these grants is included in the share-based compensation expense in the year ended March 31, 2022. 

Warrants

Changes in the warrants are described in the table below for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022:

  2022  2023 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  37,570  $313.80   167,362  $208.20 
                 
Granted  130,725   179.10   133,333   7.50 
Exercised            
Cancelled            
Expired  (933)     (36,637)   
Ending balance  167,362  $208.20   264,058  $107.93 
Intrinsic value of warrants $-      $-     
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  2.3       3.38     

Non-Qualified Stock Options

In 2022, the Company granted 1,567 options to consultants, board members and employees for the non-qualified stock options as well as the options granted under the 2017 Omnibus plan below, that vest over time in service-based grants. The options were valued under the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria: stock price range of - $62.40 - $388.50; range of exercise price - $157.50 - $167.70; expected term – 5 – 6.75 years; discount rate – 1.90 – 2.70%; and volatility – average of 60 - 91%.

In 2023, a total of 11,127 options were cancelled.

Changes in the non-qualified stock options are described in the table below for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022: 

  2022  2023 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  54,988  $205.20   39,598  $152.10 
Granted  1,567   162.30   -   - 
Exercised  (333)  (84.90)  -   - 
Cancelled  (13,450)  (390.00)  (11,127)  (171.90)
Forfeited  (3,174)  (75.00)  -   - 
Ending balance  39,598  $152.10   28,471  $164.10 
Intrinsic value of options $-      $-     
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  7.2       6.1     


2013 Incentive Stock Plan

Under the Holdings2013 Incentive Stock Plan, the Company mayis authorized to grant incentive stock in the form of Stock Options, Stock Awardsstock options, stock awards and Stock Purchase Offers of up to 5,500 shares of common stock purchase offers to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant.

 

The following table contains information aboutCompany records share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 for employees and ASC 505 for non-employees. Management valued the Ecoark Planoptions utilizing the Black-Scholes model. There were no options valued in either of the years ended March 31, 2023 and the Holdings Plan2022 as none were granted: 

  2022  2023 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  11,550  $390.00   4,250  $390.00 
Granted  -       -     
Options granted in exchange for shares  -       -     
Exercised  -       -     
Expired/Cancelled  (7,300)      (2,000)    
Forfeited  -       -     
Ending balance  4,250  $390.00   2,250  $390.00 
Intrinsic value of options $-      $     
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  5.5       4.5     

There were no service-based grants outstanding as of DecemberMarch 31, 2016: 2023 and 2022.

 

The Company has not granted any options or RSU’s under this plan in several years and is not intending to do so.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

Plan category

 

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

  

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

  

Number of securities 

available for future issuance

under equity compensation 

plans (excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

 
   (a)   (b)   (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  -   -   - 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  659(1)  $2.50   5,021 
Total  659  $2.50   5,021(2) 

2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company may grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, and other awards. Awards of up to 26,667 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are authorized for issuance under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant.

  2022  2023 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  14,829  $247.20   19,941  $198.60 
Granted  11,208   158.10   -   - 
Shares modified to options  -   -   -   - 
Exercised  (400)  -   (4,492)  - 
Cancelled  (5,363)  -   -   - 
Forfeited  (333)  -   (3,000)  - 
Ending balance  19,941  $198.60   12,449  $229.50 
Intrinsic value of options $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  7.1       6.1     

There were 8,883 and 13,375 service-based RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

For all plans, share-based compensation costs of approximately $258,655 for grants not yet recognized will be recognized as expense through June 2024 subject to any changes for actual versus estimated forfeitures.

 


NOTE 19: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

We are presently involved in the following legal proceedings. To the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of our properties or businesses are subject, which would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

(1)Represents options outstanding underOn August 1, 2018, Ecoark and Zest Labs filed a complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark Plan.and Zest Labs a total of $115 million in damages (subsequently reduced to $110 million) which includes $65 million in compensatory damages (subsequently reduced to $60 million) and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. liable on three claims. The federal jury found that Walmart Inc. misappropriated Zest Labs’ trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest Labs’ trade secrets. We expect Walmart to continue to vigorously defend the litigation and to oppose the verdict in post-trial motions and an appeal. The Company has filed post-trial motions to add an award for its attorneys’ fees as the prevailing party in the litigation. In addition to other post-trial motions, Walmart, Inc. has filed a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for remittitur or a new trial. As of the date of this Report, the court has allowed post-trial discovery but has not ruled on the motion for new trial.

(2)Shares availableOn September 21, 2021, Ecoark Holdings and Zest Labs filed a complaint against Deloitte Consulting, LLP (“Deloitte”) in the Eight Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada. The complaint was for issuance underviolation of the Nevada Uniform Trade Secret Act and was also seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages. Zest Labs began working with Deloitte in 2016, in a confidential matter in a pilot program that Zest Labs had been engaged for by Walmart. Zest Labs engaged in significant discussions, presentations, demonstrations, and information downloads with Deloitte who specifically acknowledged that this information was confidential. In June 2023, this case was dismissed.

On April 22, 2022, BitStream Mining and Ecoark Holdings Plan.were sued in Travis County, Texas District Court (Docket #79176-0002) by Print Crypto Inc. in the amount of $256,733.28 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate BitStream Mining’s Bitcoin mining operation. The defendants intend to vigorously defend themselves and have filed counterclaims in the 353rd Judicial District in Travis County, Texas on May 6, 2022 for fraudulent inducement, breach of contract, and for payment of attorney’s fees and costs. The Company provided additional documents to our attorneys on October 7, 2022, and there is no update since then. The Company has accrued the full amount of the claim in its consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023.

On July 15, 2022, BitStream Mining and two of their Management were parties to a petition filed in Ward County District Court by 1155 Distributor Partners-Austin, LLC d/b/a Lonestar Electric Supply in the amount of $414,026.83 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate the Company’s Bitcoin mining operation. The Company filed a petition to remove one of its Management from the claim in December 2022, and there is no update since then. The Company has accrued the full amount of the claim in its consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023.

On October 17, 2022, BitStream Mining was a party to a petition filed in Ward County District Court by VA Electrical Contractors, LLC in the amount of $1,666,187.18 for failure to pay for equipment purchased to operate the Company’s Bitcoin mining operation. The Company’s registered agent was served with this lawsuit on January 3, 2023, the Company answered the claim in January, and is in process of supplying documents for discovery. The Company has accrued the full amount of the claim in its consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023.

 

In the opinion of management, there are no legal matters involving us that would have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. 


Item 13. Certain RelationshipsNasdaq Compliance

On December 27, 2022, the Company received a letter from Nasdaq notifying the Company of its noncompliance with stockholder approval requirements set forth in Listing Rule 5635(d), which requires stockholder approval for transactions, other than public offerings, involving the issuance of 20% or more of the pre-transaction shares outstanding at less than the Minimum Price (as defined therein). Additionally, the letter indicates that the Company violated Nasdaq’s voting rights rule set forth in Listing Rule 5640. The matters described in the letter relate to an amendment to the Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Related Transactions,Limitations (the “Certificate”) of the Series A, shares of which were issued by the Company on June 8, 2022 in a private placement transaction which was previously disclosed on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2022. Specifically, the Company amended the Certificate on November 28, 2022 to: (i) increase the stated value of the Series A from $10,000 to $10,833.33; (ii) provide for the dividends payable under the Series A to be payable in Common Stock rather than cash effective beginning November 1, 2022, and Director Independence.(iii) reduce the conversion price of the Series A from $63.00 to the lesser of (1) $30.00 and (2) the higher of (A) 80% of the 10-day daily volume weighted average price and (B) $7.50 (the “Amendment”). According to the letter, the Company was required to obtain stockholder approval to effect the Amendment because the Series A as amended provides for the potential issuance of 1,733,333 shares of Common Stock at less than the Minimum Price under Listing Rule 5635(d), and the Amendment also violates Listing Rule 5640 by providing the holder of the Series A with voting rights on an as-converted basis with the Series A convertible into Common Stock at a discount, thereby violating Listing Rule 5640.

 

In accordance with General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K, the information required by this item is incorporated by referenceletter, the Company was provided 45 calendar days from the Proxy Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Feesdate of the letter, or until February 10, 2023, to submit a plan to regain compliance with the referenced Listing Rules, and Services.if such plan is accepted by Nasdaq, the Company can receive an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the date of the letter to evidence compliance. However, if the Company’s plan is not accepted by Nasdaq, or is not sufficiently executed to regain compliance and remedy the matters set forth in the letter, the Company’s Common Stock will be subject to delisting. In connection with the letter the Company was also requested certain documents and information related to its sale of White River.

 

In accordanceconnection with General Instruction G(3)the December 27th letter, the Company was also requested to provide certain documents and information related to its sale of Form 10-K,White River, including as it pertains to the $30,000,000 in preferred stock value being carried on the Company’s balance sheet as consideration for the sale of the entity. According to the correspondence, the request was made under Listing Rule 5250 which provides that a listed company will provide Nasdaq with requested information required by this item is incorporated by referencedeemed necessary to make a determination regarding such company’s continued listing.

Further, on December 30, 2022, the Company received another letter from the Proxy Statement.Nasdaq notifying the Company of its noncompliance with Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) by failing to maintain a minimum bid price for its Common Stock of at least $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days and providing the Company with a 180 calendar day grace period to regain compliance with the Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), subject to a potential 180 calendar day extension, as described below. To regain compliance, the Company’s Common Stock must have a minimum closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for at least 10 consecutive business days within the grace period which ends on June 28, 2023. To qualify for the additional grace period, the Company will be required to meet the continued listing requirement for the market value of its publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards for The Nasdaq Capital Market, with the exception of the bid price requirement, and will need to provide written notice of its intention to cure the deficiency during the second grace period, by effecting a reverse stock split if necessary, which would also require stockholder approval unless completed with a proportionate reduction in our authorized Common Stock under our Articles of Incorporation.

 

On January 26, 2023, Nasdaq sent an email to the Company raising 13 questions concerning the White River transaction, White River’s business, seeking verification that the Company had in fact transferred $3 million to White River last July and questioning the time allocations of the two senior executive officers of the Company and White River, among other things. The Company responded on February 15, 2023.

19


 

 

PART IVThe Company provided responses to Nasdaq on January 11, 2023, February 10, 2023 and February 15, 2023.

 

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Magnolia Solar Corporation and Ecoark Inc. dated as of January 29, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the SEC as of February 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
3.1Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on June 13, 2008 (File No. 333-151633).
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 7, 2010 (File No. 000-53361).
3.3Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Magnolia Solar Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 24, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
3.4Certificate of Amendment to the Bylaws of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 14, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
4.1Magnolia Solar Corporation 2013 Incentive Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC as of February 7, 2013 (File No. 333-186505)
10.1Form of Modification Agreement between Magnolia Solar Corporation and holders of Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Notes and Warrants, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of February 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).  
10.2Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 6, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.3Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC as of April 29, 2016 (File No. 333-211045).
10.4Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC as of May 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.5Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC as of May 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.6Share Exchange Agreement by and between Pioneer Products, LLC, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC and Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated as of May 3, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 9, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.7Master License Agreement by and between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc., dated as of April 30, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the SEC as of June 17, 2016 (File No. 333-211045).
10.8Share Exchange Agreement by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc., Eco3D, LLC and Ken Smerz and Ted Mort, dated as of September 22, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of September 28, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.9Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 13, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.10Purchase Agreement by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Reddiamond Partners LLC, dated as of January 13, 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 13, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.11Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 6, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
21List of Subsidiaries
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

20

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.If our Common Stock is delisted from Nasdaq, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

 

 Ecoark Holdings, Inc.it may adversely affect the Company’s ability to raise capital which it needs to stay operational;

 (Registrant)a limited availability of market quotations for our Common Stock;

reduced liquidity with respect to our Common Stock;

a determination that our shares of Common Stock are a “penny stock” which will require broker-dealers trading in our Common Stock to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our Common Stock; and

If we are unable to rectify any of the above-described Nasdaq issues, for failure to timely obtain stockholder approval, a delisting will subject us and our stockholders to the above and other adverse consequences and could also delay us from effecting the announced spin-offs of common stock of White River and Wolf Energy certain entities as described elsewhere in this Report. See “Risk Factors” contained elsewhere in this Report.

On June 21, 2023, the Company received a letter from the Listing Qualifications staff of Nasdaq notifying the Company that the Staff has determined that the Company has violated Nasdaq’s voting rights rule set forth in Listing Rule 5640 (the “Voting Rights Rule”). The alleged violation of the Voting Rights Rule relates to the issuance of (i) 8,637.5 shares of the Series B, and (ii) 1,362.5 shares of the Series C in connection with the acquisition of BitNile.com, Inc. as well as the securities of Earnity, Inc. beneficially owned by BitNile.com (collectively, the “Assets”) pursuant to the SEA by and among the Company, Ault Alliance, Inc. and the minority stockholders of BitNile.com, which was previously disclosed on Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 14, 2023 and March 10, 2023. The Series B and C Preferred Stock has a collective stated value of $100,000,000 (the “Stated Value”), and votes on an as-converted basis, representing approximately 92.4% of the Company’s outstanding voting power on a fully diluted basis at the time of issuance.

According to the Letter, because the Preferred Stock was not issued for cash, the Staff compared the value of the Assets to the Stated Value and determined that the value of the Assets was less than the Stated Value and that the voting rights attributable to the Series B and C Preferred Stock has the effect of disparately reducing the voting rights of the Company’s existing shareholders. The Staff looked at the total assets and stockholders’ equity of BitNile.com as of March 5, 2023, as well as the market capitalization of Ault Alliance, Inc. prior to entering into the Agreement and immediately after closing of the transaction in determining, in Staff’s opinion, the value of the Assets. The Letter did not make any reference to the projections prepared by Ault Alliance, Inc. as to the future potential of the business of BitNile.com nor to the independent valuation obtained by the Company prior to closing of the transaction, which supported the Stated Value of the Preferred Stock for the total value of the Assets, both of which the Company provided to the Staff prior to receipt of the Letter.

According to the Letter, Nasdaq determined that the voting rights of the Series B and C Preferred Stock, voting on an as-converted basis, are below the minimum price per share of the Company’s common stock at the time of the issuance of the Series B and C Preferred Stock. Additionally, Nasdaq determined that the Series B provides the holder the right to appoint a majority of the Company’s board of directors when such representation is not justified by the relative contribution of the Series B pursuant to the Agreement.

Under the Voting Rights Rule, a company cannot create a new class of security that votes at a higher rate than an existing class of securities or take any other action that has the effect of restricting or reducing the voting rights of an existing class of securities. As such, according to the Letter, the issuance of the Series B and C Preferred Stock violated the Voting Rights Rule because the holders of the Series B and C Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on an as-converted basis, thus having greater voting rights than holders of common stock, and the Series B is entitled to a disproportionate representation on the Company’s board of directors.

According to the Letter, the Company has 45 calendar days from the date of the Letter, or until August 7, 2023, to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Voting Rights Rule, and if such plan is accepted by Nasdaq, the Company can receive an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the date of the Letter to evidence compliance. However, if the Company’s plan is not accepted by Nasdaq, the Company’s common stock will be subject to delisting. The Company would have the right to appeal that decision to a hearings panel.


NOTE 20: CONCENTRATIONS

The Company occasionally maintains cash balances in excess of the FDIC insured limit. The Company does not consider this risk to be material.

NOTE 21: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company measures and discloses the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the fair value hierarchy prescribed by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fair value hierarchy has three levels, which are based on reliable available inputs of observable data. The hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The three-level hierarchy is defined as follows: 

Level 1 – quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

Level 2 – quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

Level 3 – fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

Financial instruments consist principally of cash, prepaid expenses, other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, notes payable, and amounts due to related parties. The fair value of cash is determined based on Level 1 inputs. There were no transfers into or out of “Level 3” during the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate its current fair values because of its nature and respective relatively short maturity dates or durations.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. The Company records the fair value of the of the warrant derivative liabilities disclosed in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The fair values of the derivatives were calculated using the Black-Scholes Model. The fair value of the derivative liabilities is revalued on each balance sheet date with corresponding gains and losses recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations. The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis as of: 

  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total Gains
and (Losses)
 
March 31, 2023            
Warrant derivative liabilities $-  $       -  $6,264  $4,312,366 
Preferred stock derivative liabilities  -   -   19,855,962   28,611,760 
Bitcoin  -   -   -   (9,122)
Investment – White River Energy Corp  -   -   9,224,785   (20,775,215)
                 
March 31, 2022                
Warrant derivative liabilities $-  $-  $4,318,630  $15,386,301 
Bitcoin  19,267   -   -   (7,228)


The table below shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended March 31, 2023:

Beginning balance $(4,318,630)
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation included in earnings  32,924,126 
Reclassification from mezzanine equity  (10,096,664)
Recognition of derivative liability at inception on Series B and C Preferred Stock  (53,913,000)
Gain on derivative at inception of amendment  14,365,276 
Net change in investment – White River Energy Corp  (20,775,215)
Purchases  30,000,000 
Sales/conversions to equity  541,666 
Ending balance $(10,637,441)

The balances in the derivative liabilities are net of $635,000 which is related to Series A preferred shares to be redeemed.

The table below shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended March 31, 2022:

Beginning balance $(7,213,407)
Net change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation included in earnings  15,386,301 
Recognition of derivative liability at inception on registered direct offering  (11,201,869)
Recognition of derivative liability on warrants granted for commissions and interest  (1,289,655)
Ending balance $(4,318,630)

NOTE 22: LEASES

The Company has adopted ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as of April 1, 2019 and will account for its leases in terms of the right of use assets and offsetting lease liability obligations under this pronouncement. The Company had had only short-term leases up through the acquisition of Banner Midstream. The Company acquired a right of use asset and lease liability on March 27, 2020. The Company recorded these amounts at present value, in accordance with the standard, using a discount rate of 5%. The right of use asset is composed of the sum of all lease payments, at present value, and is amortized straight line over the life of the expected lease term. For the expected term of the lease the Company used the initial terms ranging between 24 and 60 months. Upon the election by the Company to extend the lease for additional years, that election will be treated as a lease modification and the lease will be reviewed for re-measurement. 

The Company has chosen to implement this standard using the modified retrospective model approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment, which does not require the Company to adjust the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the new guidance. The Company has also elected to utilize the transition related practical expedients permitted by the new standard. The modified retrospective approach provides a method for recording existing leases at adoption and in comparative periods that approximates the results of a modified retrospective approach. Adoption of the new standard did not result in an adjustment to retained earnings for the Company.

As of March 31, 2023, the value of the unamortized lease right of use asset is $339,304 (through maturity at October 31, 2026). As of March 31, 2023, the Company’s lease liability was $345,976. 

Maturity of lease liability for the operating leases for the period ended March 31,

2024 $124,670 
2025 $95,450 
2026 $98,313 
2027 $58,341 
Imputed interest $(30,798)
Total lease liability $345,976 

Disclosed as:   
Current portion $110,121 
Non-current portion $235,855 

Amortization of the right of use asset for the period ended March 31,

2024 $111,805 
2025 $84,488 
2026 $88,932 
2027 $54,079 
Total $339,304 


Total Lease Cost

Individual components of the total lease cost incurred by the Company is as follows:

Operating lease expense – years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022$218,102$178,322

NOTE 23: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

See Notes 6 for the investment in White River Energy Corp, and Note 17 for the preferred stock issued in the year ended March 31, 2023 with a significant shareholder. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer hold similar positions in White River Energy Corp.

Gary Metzger, a director, advanced $577,500 to the Company through March 31, 2020, under the terms of notes payable that bears interest at rates ranging between 10% and 15% interest per annum. These notes along with all accrued interest were repaid in August 2021. 

The Company made periodic loans to Agora to permit it to begin its Bitcoin mining business. On November 13, 2021, Agora issued the Company a $7.5 million term note which accrues 10% per annum interest and was due March 31, 2023. The line of credit was established prior to the pending spin-out of Agora. Now that Agora will remain in BitNile Metaverse, this term note has been cancelled (effective March 31, 2023), and the amounts due from Agora are considered intercompany advances and are eliminated in the consolidation.  

In the acquisition of Bitnile.com, the Company assumed $4,404,350 in advances to the former parent of Bitnile.com. In the period March 6, 2023 through March 31, 2023, an additional $1,378,293 was advanced to Bitnile.com and $5,782,643 remains outstanding at March 31, 2023.

NOTE 24: INCOME TAXES

The following table summarizes the significant differences between the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate for financial statement purposes for the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022:

  2023  2022 
Federal income taxes at statutory rate  21.00%  21.00%
State income taxes at statutory rate  2.95%  1.17%
Permanent differences and one-time adjustments  (10.78)%  29.13%
True-up impact  (6.31)%  (195.34)%
Change in valuation allowance  (6.83)%  143.14%
Totals  0.03%  (0.90)%

The following is a summary of the net deferred tax asset (liability) as of March 31, 2023 and 2022: 

  As of  As of 
  March 31,
2023
  March 31,
2022
 
Deferred tax assets:      
Net operating losses $43,516,584  $44,372,604 
Accrued expenses  253,377   65,361 
Stock options  10,348,313   7,014,812 
ROU Liability  86,321   246,007 
Intangibles – Oil and Gas Properties  -   853,051 
Other  1,412,142   177,151 
Total deferred tax assets  55,616,737   52,728,986 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Intangible assets  -   (386,831)
ROU Assets  (84,656)  (241,126)
Other  -   (257,346)
         
Total deferred tax liabilities  (84,656)  (885,303)
   55,532,081   51,843,683 
Valuation allowance  (55,532,081)  (51,843,683)
         
Net deferred tax assets/liabilities $-  $- 

The Federal net operating loss at March 31, 2023 is $204,935,694. There is also state net operating losses carryforwards of $507,864 in Arizona, $7,077,013 in Louisiana, $1,041,109 in Mississippi and $1,047,156 in Arkansas. Out of the $204,935,694 federal net operating loss carryforward $125,778,130 will begin to expire in 2024 and $79,157,564 will have an indefinite life. After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, Management has recorded a full valuation allowance at March 31, 2023, due to the uncertainty of realizing the deferred income tax assets.


The Company is subject to taxation in the US and various state jurisdictions. US federal income tax returns for 2020 and after remain open to examination. As of March 31, 2023, the Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits, and continues to monitor its current and prior tax positions for any changes. The Company recognizes penalties and intertest related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. For the year ended March 31, 2023, there were no penalties or interest recorded in income tax expense.

The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the year ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 is as follows for their continuing operations:

Current$-$-
Deferred-   -

Date: March 15, 2017

Total
By:/s/ RANDY MAY$
-  Randy May$
- Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 15, 2017

By:/s/ JAY OLIPHANT
Jay Oliphant
Corporate Controller
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: March 15, 2017

By:

/s/ TROY RICHARDS

Troy Richards
Director

Date: March 15, 2017

By:/s/ PETER MEHRING

Peter Mehring
Director

Date: March 15, 2017

By:

/s/ GARY METZGER

Gary Metzger
Director
Date: March 15, 2017By:

/s/ CHARLES RATELIFF

Charles Rateliff
Director

Date: March 15, 2017

By:

/s/ JOHN CAHILL

John Cahill
Director

Date: March 15, 2017

By:

/s/ TERRENCE MATTHEWS

Terrence Matthews
Director

 

The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions and has not received any notices from tax authorities.

NOTE 25: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS 

Subsequent to March 31, 2023, the Company had the following transactions: 

On April 4, 2023, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Agreement”) with Ault Lending, LLC (“Ault”) and White River Energy Corp (“White River”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to advance to White River payments of up to $3.25 million (the “Amounts”), and White River agreed to accept the Amounts as payment of Ault’s $3.25 million payable to White River from Ault’s exercise of participation rights in oil and gas exploration and drilling ventures which White River granted Ault in connection with its acquisition of White River Holdings Corp. in July 2022. The parties agreed that the Amounts will be treated as a credit to the sums owed to White River, and the Company and Ault agreed that in lieu of repayment of the Amounts advanced to White River, Ault will permit the Company to redeem shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series A”) held by Ault by dividing the Amounts by the stated value of such shares, or one share of Series A for each $10,833.33 advanced to White River. The redemption cannot occur until the previously announced spin-offs by the Company of shares of common stock of White River and Wolf Energy Services Inc. occur which would permit Ault to receive its full dividends thereunder.

On April 27, 2023, the Company sold $6.875 million of principal face amount senior secured convertible notes with an original issue discount to sophisticated investors for gross proceeds to the company of $5.5 million. The notes mature on April 27, 2024 and are secured by all of the assets of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, including BitNile.com.

On May 4, 2023, the Company amended their Certificate of Incorporation for a 1-for-30 reverse stock split. The Company also reduced their authorized shares on a 1-for-30 basis going from 100,000,000 authorized shares down to 3,333,333 authorized shares. The Company has reflected this reverse split retroactively in their consolidated financial statements pursuant to SAB Topic 4C.

On May 8, 2023, the Company received a letter from the Listing Qualifications staff (the “Staff”) of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) notifying the Company that the Staff has determined to delist the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) from The Nasdaq Capital Market, effective May 17, 2023, pursuant to Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iii), as the Company’s common stock traded below $0.10 per share for 10 consecutive trading days.


On May 12, 2023, the Company issued a press release announcing a 1-for-30 reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock which will be effective for trading purposes as of the commencement of trading on May 15, 2023.

On May 15, 2023, Agora and Trend Ventures, LP entered into a First Amendment of Senior Secured Promissory Note (“First Amendment”), to amend the $4,250,000 senior secured promissory note entered into June 16, 2022. The First Amendment amended the following clauses of the original note: (a) the principal amount was amended from $4,250,000 to $4,443,869.86, which includes all of the accrued interest through May 15, 2023; (b) the maturity date was amended from June 16, 2025 to May 15, 2025; and (c) the interest rate shall remain at 5%, and any additional accrued interest under the Default Rate shall be mutually waived by both parties. No payments on either principal or interest shall be due until the new maturity date.

On May 26, 2023, the Company received a letter from Nasdaq stating that the Company’s bid price deficiency had been cured, and that the Company was in compliance with all applicable listing standards.

On June 5, 2023, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the “ELOC Purchase Agreement”) with Arena Business Results, LLC (“Arena”), which provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions and limitations set forth therein, we have the right to direct Arena to purchase up to an aggregate of $100,000,000 of shares of our common stock over the 36-month term of the ELOC Purchase Agreement. Under the ELOC Purchase Agreement, after the satisfaction of certain commencement conditions, including, without limitation, the effectiveness of the Registration Statement (as defined in the ELOC Purchase Agreement), we have the right to present Arena with an advance notice (each, an “Advance Notice”) directing Arena to purchase any amount up to the Maximum Advance Amount (as described below).

On June 9, 2023, Plaintiffs Ecoark Holdings, and Zest Labs, and Defendant, Deloitte, filed a stipulation and order to dismiss Case No. A-21-841379-B in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada with prejudice. The parties agreed to resolve their differences amicably and the case has been dismissed. As a result of this dismissal, the Company does not anticipate realizing any proceeds, whether deemed significant or insignificant, which would result in a distribution of net proceeds to shareholders of record as of November 15, 2022.

On June 16, 2023, the Company terminated the ATM upon achievement of the raising of approximately $3,500,000. We issued a total of 1,370,277, including 1,026,227 subsequent to March 31, 2023.

On June 21, 2023, the Company received a letter (the “Letter”) from the Listing Qualifications staff (the “Staff”) of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) notifying the Company that the Staff has determined that the Company has violated Nasdaq’s voting rights rule set forth in Listing Rule 5640 (the “Voting Rights Rule”). The alleged violation of the Voting Rights Rule relates to the issuance of (i) 8,637.5 shares of newly designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (the “Series B”), and (ii) 1,362.5 shares of newly designated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (the “Series C,” and together with the Series B, the “Preferred Stock”) in connection with the acquisition of BitNile.com, Inc. (“BitNile”) as well as the securities of Earnity, Inc. beneficially owned by BitNile (collectively, the “Assets”) pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among the Company, Ault Alliance, Inc. (“AAI”) and the minority stockholders of BitNile, which was previously disclosed on Current Reports on Form 8-K filed by the Company on February 14, 2023 and March 10, 2023. The Preferred Stock has a collective stated value of $100,000,000 (the “Stated Value”), and votes on an as-converted basis, representing approximately 92.4% of the Company’s outstanding voting power on a fully diluted basis at the time of issuance. According to the Letter, the Company has 45 calendar days from the date of the Letter, or until August 7, 2023, to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Voting Rights Rule, and if such plan is accepted by Nasdaq, the Company can receive an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the date of the Letter to evidence compliance. However, if the Company’s plan is not accepted by Nasdaq, the Company’s common stock will be subject to delisting. The Company would have the right to appeal that decision to a hearings panel.

F-48

 

 

iso4217:USD compsci:item