UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 20192021

 

OR

 

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _______ to _______

 

Commission File Number 000-53361

 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada 30-0680177
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
5899 Preston Road #505, Frisco,303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 7503478215
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(479) 259-2977(800) 762-7293

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered
None

  

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐  No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐  No ☒ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No ☐ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒  No ☐ 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐ 

  

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
 Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ( 15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐  No ☒ 

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately $42,668,022.$158,069,577.

 

As of August 16, 2019,June 28, 2021, there were 62,348,30122,820,573 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 includes restated audited financial statements (and related disclosures) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. This Form 10-K amends and restates consolidated financial statements of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (“the Company”), for the fiscal year endedMarch 31, 2018 and an adjustment to the balances as of March 31, 2017 previously reported in the Annual Report onForm 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, as originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2018 (the “Original Filing”). This Form 10-K amends the Original Filing of the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 to reflect the correction of an error in the previously reported fiscal year 2018 and fiscal year 2017 consolidated financial statements related to the Company’s classification of certain warrants as equity rather than as liabilities.

In addition, this Form 10-K provides a revised audit report on the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.

The Company will be also be filing amended Quarterly Reports for the quarterly periods ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, September 30, 2018 and 2017 and June 30, 2018 and 2017 to restate the previously issued interim financial statements due to the accounting error described above. All earnings press releases and similar communications issued by us, for such period, should not be relied upon and are superseded in their entirety by this Form 10-K.

The Company has concluded that certain warrants issued in March and May 2017 and in March and August 2018 were required to be classified as liabilities since characteristics of derivative instruments were met and the warrants did not qualify for equity classification.  

 

 

 

 

  Page
   
 PART I 
Item 1.Business.2
   
Item 1A.Risk Factors.411
   
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.1232
   
Item 2.Properties.1232
   
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.1237
   
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.1237
   
 PART II 
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.1338
   
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.1439
   
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.1439
   
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk49
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.23F-1
   
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.2450
   
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.2450
   
Item 9B.Other Information.2550
   
 PART III 
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.2651
   
Item 11.Executive Compensation.2954
   
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.3257
   
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.3459
   
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services.3660
   
 PART IV 
Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.3861

  

i

 

PART I

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements underwithin the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act , including statements regarding our oil and gas reserves, future operating results, including the expected increase in revenues from the energy business and continued losses and negative cash flows, expected substantial investments to fund our business and support growth, including expenditures related to the joint drilling venture, expected sources of liquidity, future impact of reduced oil and gas prices or reduced demand, expected sources of revenue, potential future acquisitions, our beliefs regarding the classification of drivers and owner-operators as independent contractors, our plans with respect to loss reserves, the sufficiency of our aggregate insurance limits, our expectations with respect to future developments in the ongoing litigation, including the receipt of proceeds, our expectations regarding the availability of licenses to use third party intellectual property, dependence of future success on key management and employees, future dividend policy, and future liquidity. 

All statements other federal securities lawsthan statements of historical facts contained in this Report, including statements regarding our future financial position, liquidity, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is likely,” “will,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that are subjectwe believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. The results anticipated by any or all of these forward-looking statements might not occur. Important factors, uncertainties and risks that may cause actual results to a numberdiffer materially from these forward-looking statements include oil and gas price volatility, to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy, the price of, and demand for, oil and gas, our ability to efficiently develop our current oil reserves and economically find or acquire additional recoverable reserves, general risks related to drilling operations, future regulatory changes, including changes related to climate change, any unanticipated losses, potential unfavorable outcome of the ongoing litigation, potential unavailability of licenses to use third party intellectual property, continued service of key management and employees, and the availability of capital on acceptable terms when needed or at all, including as the result of the recent climate change initiatives. Further information on the risks and uncertainties many of which are beyondaffecting our control including without limitation the following: (i)business is contained in Part I. Item 1A. – Risk Factors and our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions are subject to change at any time at our discretion; (ii) our plans and results of operations will be affected by our ability to manage growth; and (iii) other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or the “SEC”).

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,’’ “will,’’ “should,’’ “could,’’ “expects,’’ “plans,’’ “intends,’’ “anticipates,’’ “believes,’’ “estimates,’’ “predicts,’’ “seeks,” “potential,’’ or “continue’’ or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such statements.

These forward-looking statements are made only as of the date hereof. We are underundertake no dutyobligation to publicly update or revise any of these forward-looking statements, afterwhether as the dateresult of this reportnew information, future events or to provide any assurance with respect to future performance or results. You are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and should read this report thoroughly with the understanding that the actual results may differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including, without limitation, unforeseen events beyond management’s control and assumptions that prove to be inaccurate or unfounded. The following list of examples, while not exclusive or exhaustive, includes some of the many possible unforeseen developments that may cause actual results to differ from anticipated or desired results:otherwise.

Overall economic and business conditions;
Increased competition in the sustainability consumer and retail markets and the industries in which we compete;
Changes in the economic, competitive, legal, and business conditions in local and regional markets and in the national and international marketplace;
The actions of national, state and local legislative, regulatory, and judicial bodies and authorities;
Delays or interruptions in entering into contracts or acquiring necessary assets;
The necessity to expand or curtail operations, obtain additional capital, or change business strategy;
Changes in technology; and,
Any of the other factors discussed in this report, including those factors discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors”.

 

As used in this Annual Report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our”,“we,” “us,” “our,” “Ecoark Holdings” and “Ecoark Holdings”the “Company” mean Ecoark Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, (the “Company”), unless otherwise indicated.

Unless the context otherwise indicates or requires, all product names and trade names used in this Annual Report are the Company's trademarks, although the “®” and “™” trademark designations may have been omitted.


Except as otherwise indicated, dollar amounts and numbers of shares that follow in this report are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.

Item 1 Business

 

General Corporate History

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 19, 2007 under the name Magnolia Solar Corporation (“Magnolia Solar”). On March 18, 2016, Magnolia Solar filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada thereby changing its name to Ecoark Holdings, Inc.

Overview

 

Ecoark Holdings Inc. (“Ecoark Holdings” or the “Company”) is an innovative AgTech company focused on solutions that reducea diversified holding company. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Company has operations in three areas: (i) oil and gas, including exploration, production and drilling operations and transportation services, (ii) post-harvest shelf-life and freshness food wastemanagement technology, and improve delivered freshness(iii) financial services including consulting, fund administration and product margins for fresh and perishable foods for a wide rangeasset management. The Company’s subsidiaries consist of organizations including growers, processors, distributors and retailers.Banner Midstream Corp., (“Banner Midstream”), White River Holdings Corp. (“White River”), Shamrock Upstream Energy LLC (“Shamrock”), Pinnacle Frac Transport LLC (“Pinnacle Frac”), Capstone Equipment Leasing LLC (“Capstone”), Ecoark, Holdings addresses this through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary:Inc. (“Ecoark”), Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs” or “Zest”), and Trend Discovery Holdings Inc. (“Trend Holdings”).

White River and Shamrock are engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, and drilling operations on over 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Pinnacle Frac provides transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations. Capstone procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors.

Since the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020, which currently comprises the exploration, production and drilling operations, the Company has focused its efforts to a considerable extent on expanding its exploration and production footprint and capabilities by acquiring real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases.

On June 11, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SR Acquisition I, LLC for $1,000 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of 262 total wells in Mississippi and Louisiana, approximately 9,000 acres of active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment. The 262 total wells include 57 active producing wells, 19 active disposal wells, 136 shut-in with future utility wells, and 50 shut-in pending plugging wells. Included in the assignment are 4 wells in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale formation.


On June 18, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SN TMS, LLC for $500 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of wells, active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment.

On August 14, 2020, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, White River E&P LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company Rabb Resources, LTD. and Claude Rabb, the sole owner of Rabb Resources, LTD. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Rabb Resources, LTD. The acquired assets consisted of certain real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases. The Company committedin June 2020 previously provided for bridge financing to a planRabb Resources, LTD under the $225,000 Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note. As consideration for entering into the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to focus its businesspay Rabb Resources, LTD. A total of $3,500,000 consisting of (i) $1,500,000 in cash, net of $304 in outstanding amounts related to the note receivable and accrued interest receivable, and (ii) $2,000,000 payable in common stock of the Company, which based on Zest Labs and divested non-core assets in 2019 that included assetsthe closing price of Pioneer Products, LLC (“Pioneer Products” or “Pioneer”) and Magnolia Solar, Inc. (“Magnolia Solar”). Those assets are reported as held for sale and their operations are reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The subsidiary Eco3d, LLC (“Eco3d”) was sold on April 14, 2017 and is also reported as held for sale and discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements. The Company has 20 employees of continuing operations and no employees of discontinued operationscommon stock as of the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement equaled 103,000 shares. The Company accounted for this filing.acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the Rabb Resources, LTD historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

 

On September 4, 2020, White River SPV 3, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banner Midstream entered into an Agreement and Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease with a privately held limited liability company (the “Assignor”). Under the Lease Assignment, the Assignor assigned a 100% working interest (75% net revenue interest) in a certain oil and gas lease covering in excess of 1,600 acres (the “Lease”), and White River paid $1,500,000 in cash to the Assignor. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

On October 9, 2020, the Company and White River SPV, entered into a Participation Agreement (the “Participation Agreement”) by and among the Company, White River SPV, BlackBrush Oil & Gas, L.P. (“BlackBrush”) and GeoTerre, LLC, an unrelated privately-held limited liability company (the “Assignor”), to conduct drilling of wells in the Austin Chalk formation.

Pursuant to the Participation Agreement, the Company and White River SPV have agreed, among other things, to pre-fund a majority of the cost, approximately $5,800,000, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387,000 has been expensed as drilling costs. The Participation Agreement requires the estimated amount of the drilling costs that were paid into a designated escrow account by the commencement of drilling in January 2021. BlackBrush has agreed to assign to the other parties to the Participation Agreement, subject to certain exceptions and limitations specified therein, specified portions of its leasehold working interest in certain Austin Chalk formation units. The Participation Agreement provides for an initial allocation of the working interests and net revenue interests among the assignor, BlackBrush and the Company and then a re-allocation upon payout or payment of drilling and completion costs for each well drilled. Prior to payout, the Company will own 90% of the working interest and 67.5% of the net revenue interest in each well. Following payout, the Company will own 70% of working interest and 52.5% net revenue interest in each well.

The Parties to the Participation Agreement, except for the Company, had previously entered into a Joint Operating Agreement, dated September 4, 2020 (the “Operating Agreement”) establishing an area of mutual interest, including the Austin Chalk formation, and governing the parties’ rights and obligations with respect to drilling, completion and operation of wells therein. The Participation Agreement and the Operating Agreement require, among other things, that White River SPV and the Company drill and complete at least one horizontal Austin Chalk well with a certain minimum lateral each calendar year and/or maintain leasehold by paying its proportionate share of any rental payments.


Active drilling commenced on January 15, 2021 and on January 31, 2021 the drilling reached its targeted location in the Austin Chalk formation. On February 13, 2021, the drilling had reached its first milestone which initiated a contractual vesting of asset assignments with the successful drilling of a minimum lateral distance of 2,500 feet. On February 14, 2021, we reached its second milestone, with the conclusion of drilling of a lateral with a full vertical section distance of 4,046 feet. The well was drilled successfully using managed pressure drilling techniques, allowing for visibility of the productive intervals throughout the drilling process in the Austin Chalk.

On September 30, 2020, the Company and White River Energy, LLC (“White River Energy”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into three asset purchase agreements (the “Asset Purchase Agreements”) with privately-held limited liability companies to acquire working interests in the Harry O’Neal oil and gas mineral lease (the “O’Neal OGML”), the related well bore, crude oil inventory and equipment. Immediately prior to the acquisition, White River Energy owned an approximately 61% working interest in the O’Neal OGML oil well and a 100% working interest in any future wells.

The purchase prices of these leases were $126,000, $312,000 and $312,000, respectively, totaling $750,000. The consideration paid to the Sellers was in the form of 68,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

In February and March 2021, the Company acquired additional leases for $916,000 under the Blackbrush/Deshotel lease related to the Participation Agreement.

Reverse Stock Split

Effective with the opening of trading on December 17, 2020, the Company implemented a one-for-five reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock and a simultaneous proportionate reduction of its authorized common stock. The reverse stock split was effected without obtaining stockholder approval as permitted by Nevada law, and the authorized common stock was proportionately reduced to 40,000,000 shares. All share and per share figures are reflected on a post-split basis herein.

Ratification of Authorized Capital Increase

At the special meeting held on December 29, 2020, the stockholders of the Company ratified the previously approved increase of the number of shares of common stock the Company is authorized to issue from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares.

Authorized Capital Reduction

Effective December 29, 2020, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to reduce its authorized common stock from 40,000,000 to 30,000,000.

Registered Direct Offering of Common Stock and Warrants

On December 31, 2020, the Company completed a registered direct offering, whereby the Company issued 889,000 shares of common stock and 889,000 accompanying warrants to purchase common stock to one institutional investor under the effective Form S-3 at $9.00 per share and accompanying warrant for a total of $8,000,000 in gross proceeds, before placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The warrants are exercisable for a two-year term at a strike price of $10.00 per share. The Company granted 62,000 warrants to the placement agent as compensation in addition to the $560,000 cash commission received by the placement agent. The placement agent warrants are exercisable at $11.25 per share and expire on January 2, 2023.


Our principal executive offices are located at 5899 Preston Road #505, Frisco, Texas 75034,303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 78215, and our telephone number is (479) 259-2977.(800) 762-7293. Our website address is http://zestlabs.com/ecoarkusa.com/. Our website and the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in and are not considered part of this report.

 

Impact of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound effect on the U.S. and global economy and may continue to affect the economy and the industries in which we operate, depending on the vaccine rollouts and the emergence of virus mutations.

COVID-19 did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations or the Consolidated Balance Sheets included in this Form 10-K. However, it did have a material impact on our management’s ability to operate effectively. The impact included the difficulties of working remotely from home including slow Internet connection, the inability of our accounting and financial officers to collaborate as effectively as they would otherwise have in an office environment and issues arising from mandatory state quarantines.

While it is not possible at this time to estimate with sufficient certainty the continued impact that COVID-19 could have on the Company’s business, future outbreaks and the measures taken by federal, state, local and foreign governments could disrupt the operation of the Company’s business. The COVID-19 outbreak and mitigation measures have also had and may continue to have an adverse impact on global and domestic economic conditions, including the reducing demand for oil, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition, including on its potential to conduct financings on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. In addition, the Company has taken temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of the virus to its employees, including temporarily requiring employees to work remotely, and discouraging employee attendance at in-person work-related meetings, which could negatively affect the Company’s business. The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak may impact the Company’s results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severity of the virus and the actions to contain its impact.

The Coronavirus, Aid, Relief and Security Act (“CARES Act”) includes, among other things, provisions relating to payroll tax credits and deferrals, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credits and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. The CARES Act also established a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), whereby certain small business are eligible for a loan to fund payroll expenses, rent and related costs. We have received funding under the PPP, and a majority of that as indicated in our Consolidated Statement of Operations has been forgiven.

Description of Business

 

Ecoark Holdings’ continuingBanner Midstream Corp

Through its indirect wholly-owned operating subsidiaries Pinnacle Frac, Capstone, White River, and Shamrock, the Company is engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, and drilling operations focus on solutions offered by Zest Labs.over 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, as well as transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations, and procurement and financing of equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors.

The Company entered the oil and gas industry following the previously disclosed acquisition of Banner Midstream Corp. on March 27, 2020.

 

Zest Labs

 

Through its wholly-owned subsidiary Zest Labs, the Company offers freshness management solutions for fresh food growers, suppliers, processors, distributors, grocers and restaurants. Its Zest Fresh solution is a cloud-based post-harvest shelf-life and freshness management solution that improves delivered freshness of produce and protein and reduces post-harvest losses at the retailer due to temperature handling and processing by 50% or more by intelligently matching customer freshness requirements with actual product freshness. It focuses on four primary value propositions – operational efficiency, consistent food freshness, reduced waste, and improved food safety. Zest Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence at a pallet level. Zest Labs also offers its Zest Delivery solution that provides real-time monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food.


On June 6, 2019, Zest Labsannounced a strategic collaboration between AgroFresh and Zest Labs to strengthen their end-to-end solutions. AgroFresh will incorporate Zest Labs’ Zest Fresh™ solution into its FreshCloud™ Transit Insights platform. The agreement will utilize both companies’ resources and strengths to provide customers with a comprehensive solution that improves operations, increases visibility into produce shelf-life and reduces food waste.

 

Zest Labs was previously known as Intelleflex Corporation. Effectiveincorporated in the State of Delaware on October 28, 2016, Intelleflex Corporation changed its name to Zest Labs, Inc. to align its corporate name with its mission and the brand name of its products and services.September 23, 2004.

    

The Zest Fresh value proposition is to reduce fresh food loss by improving quality consistency. In the U.S. produce market, it is reported that roughly 30% of post-harvest fresh food is lost or wasted and therefore not consumed. Both fresh food producers and retailers bear significant expense when harvested food is either rejected due to early spoilage or reduced in value due to early ripening. Zest Labs believes that a significant portion of this waste can be attributed to inconsistent quality or freshness based on variable post-harvest processing and handling. Fresh food producers and retailers manage food distribution and inventory based on the harvest date, with the assumption that all food harvested on the same day will have the same freshness. However, studies have shown that harvest conditions and post-harvest handling can have a significant effect on the actual remaining freshness and, if not properly accounted for, can result in food loss or spoilage ahead of expectations. Zest Fresh empowers fresh food producers and retailers to significantly reduce the post-harvest loss by providing real-time guidance to process adherence, intelligent distribution and best handling practices, with a goal of providing significant financial savings to fresh food producers and retailers. 

 

Zest Labs has developed the industry’s first freshness metric called the Zest Intelligent Pallet Routing Code (“ZIPR Code”). The ZIPR Code has three main components: (i) Harvest Quality which sets total freshness capacity (for example, 12 days for strawberries), (ii) Handling Impact which reflects aging acceleration due to improper handling, and (iii) Future Handling which accurately reflects how the product will be handled (for example, store shelf temperature may be 40 degrees Fahrenheit instead of the ideal 34 degrees Fahrenheit). 

 

Zest Fresh is offered to fresh food producers, processors, distributors, restaurants and grocers with pricing based on the number of pallets managed by Zest Fresh, typically from the field harvest through retail grocery delivery. The Zest Fresh service includes a re-usable wireless Internet of Things (“IoT”) condition sensor that travels with the pallet of fresh food from the field or processor through retail delivery, continuously collecting product condition data. The collected pallet product data is analyzed, using artificial intelligence-based predictive analytics in real time by the Zest Fresh cloud-based solution, with the fresh food producers and retailers accessing data through Zest Fresh web and mobile applications. Zest Fresh provides workers with real-time feedback on the current handling or processing of each pallet, empowering best practice adherence to achieve maximum freshness. Zest Fresh also provides dynamic updates as to actual product freshness for each pallet, enabling intelligent routing and inventory management of each pallet in a manner that ensures optimum delivered freshness. Zest Fresh also includes integrated blockchain support to grower and shipper customers via the Zest Fresh platform. 

 

Zest Labs’ Zest Delivery solution helps to manage prepared food delivery from the restaurant through to the customer. Zest Delivery manages the delivery container environment, both monitoring and controlling the product condition. The value of Zest Delivery is to manage prepared meals in an ideal state for consumption, while accommodating extended pre-staging or delivery times. Extended pre-staging times are associated with “instant delivery” services of prepared meals, where the meals are often pre-staged in a delivery area ahead of demand. While pre-staging enables fast demand response time, it can result in prepared meals being staged for extended periods, which can potentially impact quality, value and safety. Zest Delivery monitors and controls the delivery container environment to preserve the prepared meal in ideal, ready to consume condition. Zest Delivery also provides the dispatcher with real-time remote visibility to the condition of available meals and confirming quality prior to dispatch. Zest Delivery provides automated, real-time visibility for a very distributed fleet of drivers, reflecting prepared meal food safety, quality and availability. Zest Delivery is offered to meal delivery companies based on the quantity of delivery containers and frequency of use.

 

Zest Labs currently holds rights to 6775 U.S. patents (with additional patents pending), numerous related foreign patents, and U.S. copyrights relating to certain aspects of its Zest software, hardware devices including Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”) technology, software, and services. In addition, Zest Labs has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services,” and the Zest, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery logos, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Many of Zest Labs’ products have been designed to include licensed intellectual property obtained from third-parties. Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates.


Although most components essential to Zest Labs’ business are generally available from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID or other wireless custom integrated circuits, and application-specific integrated circuits are currently obtained by Zest Labs from single or limited sources, principally in Asia.

 

Zest Labs is part of a very competitive industry that markets solutions to fresh food supply chain users, such as fresh food growers, producers and retailers. Many other companies that are both more established and command much greater resources compete in this market. While Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery offer new technical approaches and new user value, it remains uncertain if Zest Labs will gain sufficient adoption of its products to make them viable in the market. Further, it is unclear what industry competitors are developing that might address similar user needs. Zest Labs’ products provide a new approach for industry participants, and as with any new approach, adoption is uncertain as many in the industry can be slow to embrace new technology and/or new approaches. These market challenges can lead to extended sales cycles that may include extended pilot testing often at Zest Labs’ expense, for which the outcome remains unclear until the completion of each test. For these reasons, and others, forecasting new business adoption and future revenue can be very difficult and volatile.  However,volatile; however, the Company believes that Zest Fresh offers fresh food retailers, growers, shippers, processors and distributors an opportunity to differentiate their businesses in ways that the shipment of canned and boxed food products cannot, as competition in the agriculture, grocery, food service and restaurant markets continues to accelerate. 

 

The acquisitionOur ability to execute our strategy with respect to our freshness management solutions depends in part on the outcome of 440labs in May 2017 allowed Zest Labsthe litigation related to internally maintain its software development and information solutions for cloud, mobile, and IoT applications. 440labs had been a key development partner with Zest Labsprotection of our intellectual property rights. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” for more than four years prior to the May 2017 acquisition, contributing its expertise in scalable enterprise cloud solutions and mobile applications.information.

 

Discontinued Operations:Trend Capital Management

 

Pioneer ProductsBefore we acquired Trend Holdings in May 2019 by merging Trend Holdings with and into the Company, Trend Holdings was a financial services holding company with two primary subsidiaries: Trend Discovery Capital Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Trend Capital Management”), and Barrier Crest, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Barrier Crest”). 

 

Pioneer ProductsTrend Capital Management was locatedfounded in Rogers, Arkansas2011 and was involvedTrend Holding’s primary asset.  Trend Capital Management provides services and collects fees from entities including Trend LP and Trend SPV, both of which invest in securities.  Trend Capital Management neither invests in securities nor have any role in Trend LP and Trend SPV’s purchase of securities.  The investment capital in Trend LP and Trend SPV is from individual limited partners, and not from the selling of recycled plastic products and other products. It sold to the world’s largest retailer. Pioneer Products recovered plastic waste from retail supply chains and converted the reclaimed material into new consumer products which completed a closed loop and reduced waste sent to landfills. Pioneer Products was purchased by Ecoark in 2012. Pioneer Products acquired Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC (“Sable”) in a stock transaction on May 3, 2016. Since that date, Sable’s results have been included with Pioneer Products. In May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board of Directors (“Board”) approved a plan to sell Pioneer and Sable. Pioneer concluded operations in February 2019, and the sale of Sable assets was completed in March 2019. Relevant assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale and operations are classified as discontinued in the consolidated financial statements.Company. 

 

Magnolia SolarIn the near-term, Trend LP’s performance will be driven by its investment in Volans-i, a fully autonomous vertical takeoff and landing drone delivery platform (“Volans”).  Trend LP currently owns approximately 1% of Volans and has participation rights to future financings to maintain such ownership at 1% indefinitely. More information can be found at website. www.flyvoly.com, the contents of which are not incorporated into this report. 

 

Barrier Crest provides fund administration and fund formation services to institutional investors.  Barrier Crest provides fund administration services to Trend LP and Trend SPV.

Magnolia Solar is located in Albany, New York and is principally engaged in the development and commercialization of nanotechnology-based, high-efficiency, thin-film technology that can be deposited on a variety of substrates, including glass and flexible structures. Magnolia Solar was a subsidiary of Magnolia Solar Corporation that merged with Ecoark Inc. (“Ecoark”) on March 24, 2016 to create Ecoark Holdings and continued as a subsidiary of Ecoark Holdings. In May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Magnolia Solar, and the sale was completed in May 2019. Relevant assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale and operations are classified as discontinued in the consolidated financial statements.

7

 

Competition 

 

Zest Labs operates in markets forThe Company faces intense competition with respect to its products and services that are highly competitive and face aggressive competition in all areasmarkets in which it operates.

In the oil and gas industry, we are producing and selling crude oil as a commodity so we compete against. All producers including individual well owners through the supermajor oil companies. Some of their business. these competitors at the major and supermajor categories possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than we do and our financial resources are relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors.

 

The market for cloud-based, real-time supply chain analytic solutions—the market in which Zest Labs competes—is highly competitive and is rapidly evolving. There are several new competitors with competing technologies, including companies that have greater resources than Ecoark Holdings, which operate in this space. Some of these companies are subsidiaries of large publicly traded companies that have brand recognition, established customer relationships with retailers, and own the manufacturing process.

 

Trend Holdings and its subsidiaries have significant competition from larger companies with greater assets and resources.

Sales and Marketing

Through Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries, the Company sells and provides services to its customers via a blanket master services agreement (MSA). Banner Midstream sells hydrocarbon to midstream providers such as Plains Marketing L.P. and Shell Trading (US) Company.

The Company markets its technology products and services principally through direct sales efforts and the utilization of third-party agents. Zest Labs has marketing operations and programs for demand generation, public relations, and branding/messaging that are scaled based on market engagement and available resources.

Trend Holdings and its subsidiaries provide fund administration and fund formation services to institutional investors and market their services through private marketing.


Government Regulations

Banner Midstream

Oil and gas production is regulated under a wide range of federal and state statutes, rules, orders and regulations. State and federal statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. The states in which we operate, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico (the “Territory”), have regulations governing conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells, the regulation of spacing, and requirements for plugging and abandonment of wells. Also, states in the Territory impose a severance tax on production and sales of oil, and gas within its jurisdiction. Failure to comply with these rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. Our competitors in the oil and gas industry are subject to the same regulatory requirements and restrictions that affect our operations.

Zest Labs

Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates.  The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”), is responsible for the assignment of spectrum for non-government use in the United States in accordance with regulations established by an international organization known as the International Telecommunications Union (the “ITU”). Any ITU or FCC reallocation of radio frequency spectrum, including frequency band segmentation or sharing of spectrum, could cause interference with the reception of GPS signals and may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of Zest Labs’ products, which would, in turn, cause a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Environmental Compliance Expenses

We are currently not experiencing any material expenses related to the environmental compliance. Please review Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report with regard to potential environmental compliance expenses.

Environmental, Social and Governance Strategy (ESG)

We are currently evaluating an environmentally conscious cryptocurrency mining approach to focus on and analyze innovative and valuable ways to deploy capital. We are focused on opportunities related to ESG technologies for hydrocarbon emissions and reductions in energy waste. We have formulated an approach to pursue regionally constrained energy that is otherwise lost due to a lack of commercial infrastructure to economically process and/or transport the natural gas to market. This approach is designed to drive significant molecule value through the energy intensive process of cryptocurrency mining. This strategy is anticipated to incubate green energy project development and growth by balancing regional power grid demands during times of heightened use.

Research and Development

We have devoted a substantial amount of our resources to software and hardware development activities in recent years, principally for the Zest Labs initiatives. Ecoark Holdings believes that, analyzing the competitive factors affecting the market for the solutions and services its subsidiaries provide, its products/products and services compete favorably by offering integrated solutions to their customers. The Company has incurred research and development expenses of $3,320$883,000 and $5,576$2,472,000 in the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, to develop its solutions and differentiate those solutions from competitive offerings. We incurred no capitalized software development costs in the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020.


Intellectual Property

 

The Company, through Zest Labs, currently holds rights to 75 U.S. patents (with additional patents pending), numerous related foreign patents, and U.S. copyrights relating to certain aspects of its Zest software, hardware devices including Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”) technology, software, and services. In addition, Zest Labs has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services,” and the Zest, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery logos, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Many of Zest Labs’ products have been designed to include licensed intellectual property obtained from third-parties. Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates. 

No Foreign Operations

No foreign operations are expected in connection with the Company’s business. 

Seasonality

Our business experiences a certain level of seasonality due to our oil and gas exploration and transportation business. Demand for oil, natural gas and energy is typically higher in the third and fourth quarters resulting in higher prices. Due to these seasonal fluctuations, results of operations for individual quarterly periods may not be indicative of the results that may be realized on an annual basis. Seasonal weather conditions and lease stipulations can limit drilling and producing activities and other oil and natural gas operations in a portion of our operating areas of trucking business. These seasonal anomalies can pose challenges for the drilling objectives and can increase competition for equipment, supplies and personnel during the spring and summer months, which could lead to shortages and increase costs or delay operations, thus, lowering the demand for trucking services.

Dependence on One or Few Major Customers

From time to time we may have customers generating 10 percent or more of the Company’s consolidated revenues, and loss of such customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Human Capital Resources

As of the date of this report, we have 45 full-time employees and 106 owner-operator truck drivers.

Our ability to successfully execute our strategic initiatives is highly dependent on recruiting and retaining skilled personnel and qualified drivers. Our compensation philosophy is based on incentivizing and rewarding performance, with alignment of individual, corporate, and stockholder interests. Compensation includes salaries, benefits, and equity participation. Our owner operator drivers are not salaried employees.

We are committed to the health, safety, and well-being of our employees and drivers. We follow applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and guidance. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented measures to enable employees to work remotely and have utilized cloud-based productivity and communications systems to facilitate distributed work.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to ensure that all employees maintain the highest standards of business conduct in every aspect of their dealings with each other, customers, suppliers, vendors, service providers, stockholders, and governmental authorities.

We believe the relations with our employees and drivers are satisfactory.

10

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

There are numerous risks affecting our business, many of which are beyond our control. An investmentInvesting in our common stockCommon Stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk and may not be appropriate for investors who cannot affordfactors, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K before deciding to lose their entire investment. Ifinvest in our Common Stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks actually occur,could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, or operating results could be materially harmed. This could causeof operations and future growth prospects, as well as our ability to accomplish our strategic objectives. As a result, the trading price of our common stock toCommon Stock could decline and you maycould lose all or part of your investment. In addition to the risks outlined below,Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently considerdeem immaterial may also impair our business operations.operations and stock price.


Potential

Summary Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could affectyou should consider before investing in our operating results and financial condition include, without limitation,common stock. Set forth below is a summary of the following:principal risks we face:

 

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR OPERATIONS

we have incurred significant losses since inception, we may continue to incur losses and negative cash flows in the future;

 

because we require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, our inability to generate and obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects;

significant ongoing capital requirements related to our exploration and production and transportation business;

the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. and global economy, and the uncertainty relating to its continuation and the pace of economic recovery;

the uncertainty of future results due to limited operating history;

we may be required to recognize goodwill impairment charges, which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results;

we may be required to record significant non-cash impairment charges related to a reduction in the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties;

the uncertainty of future results due to limited operating history;

our future cash flows and results of operations, are highly dependent on our ability to efficiently develop our current oil reserves and economically find or acquire additional recoverable reserves;

the dependence of our future operating results on oil and gas prices that are highly volatile;

future changes in the climate change regulatory regime and continued focus on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) regulation and sustainability initiatives, which would have the effect of reducing demand for fossil fuels and negatively impact our operating results, stock price and ability to access capital markets;

potential future changes in the regulation of hydraulic fracturing;

potential inability to retain and attract qualified drivers, including owner-operators;

potential risk that the drivers who we rely upon in our transportation business will be classified as employees rather than independent contractors; and

the uncertainty related to the outcome of the pending Walmart litigation related to the protection of our intellectual property rights.


We have experienced losses since our founding. A failureRisk Factors Relating to obtain profitability and achieve consistent positive cash flows would have a significant adverse effect on our business.Our Financial Condition

 

We havehad incurred operatingnet losses on an annual basis since our inception including a reported net loss of $13,650 for the year ended March 31, 2019. Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended March 31, 2019 was $9,040. We expect toand may continue to incur operatingexperience losses through at leastand negative cash flow in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020. future.

As of March 31, 2019,June 22, 2021, we had cash (including restricted cash) of $244, a working capital deficitapproximately $1,194,235. Prior to the acquisition of $5,045, and an accumulated deficit of $115,886. Some of our debt and equity instruments may contain derivative liabilities which may result in variability in our working capital deficit as these liabilities are re-measured each reporting period. To date,Banner Midstream, we have funded our operations principally through the sale of our capital stock and debt instruments. On December 31, 2020, we raised approximately $7,666,000 in net proceeds from the sale of 889,000 shares of common stock and short-term warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 889,000 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering. We have also raised substantial operating cash through the exercise of our warrants issued in capital raises over the past two years. Banner Midstream had financed its operations primarily through the issuance of debt securities. We have not been profitable on an annual basis since inception and had previously incurred significant operating losses. We recorded a net loss of approximately $20,888,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. Approximately 42% of the reported net loss for this fiscal year was due to non-cash charges, including a $18,518,000 non-cash charge from a change in the fair value of our warrant derivative liabilities and $21,084,000 in gain on exchange of warrants. While our warrant derivative liabilities cause us to incur a non-cash loss if our stock price goes up in a given quarter or a non-cash gain if it goes down in a quarter, we have experienced substantial exercises since the date of our July 28, 2020 prospectus registering the underlying shares of Common Stock. As of March 31, 2021, no warrants remained unexercised out of approximately 1,176,000 warrants (on a post-reverse split basis) we issued in 2020. However, we have an additional approximately 1,035,000 warrants (on a post-reverse split basis) which have derivative liabilities that will impact our future operating results. Although we expect our revenues to increase from our energy business, we will likely continue to incur losses and experience negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future. If we cannot achieve positive cash flow from operations or net income, it may make it more difficult to raise capital based on our Common Stock on acceptable terms.

Because we require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, our inability to generate and obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

Since the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020, we have increased our operating expenses in supporting our underlying business and consummating acquisitions of oil and gas properties. We intend to continue to make substantial investments to fund our business and support our growth. Among other things, we need to generate significant revenuesraise capital through the issuance of equity or debt in order to achieve profitability, and we cannot assure you that we will ever realize revenues at such levels. Iffund the drilling of oil wells for our previously announced joint venture with a Texas exploration company. Since we do achieve profitability innot currently have a debt facility to support our growth and acquisition strategy, we are seeking to fund our growth through equity offerings at opportune times when the price of our Common Stock and external factors provide an opportunity. The availability and terms of any period, wefuture financing will be dependent upon a variety of other factors which may affect the price of our Common Stock including among other things:

The pace of economic recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic;

The condition of the capital markets in general and those for smaller capitalization issuers in particular;

The effect of the potential new legislation, regulation or government action which directly affect our business such as environmental, social and governance (“ESG”), climate change, oil and gas drilling, fracking, growing market for electric vehicles and efforts to ban fossil fuels, and legislation such as California’s AB5 which causes us to treat our owner-operators in our trucking business as employees, which will tend to increase our expenses;

The impact of ESG measures, potential new rules and recent stockholder votes of large energy producers on the investment community and disclosure practices;

The possibility that certain investors concerned about potential effects of climate change would limit or eliminate their investments in oil and gas companies and the growth of the alternative-energy markets with so-called “green” funds trading at record highs;

Potential regulation or government action requiring financial institutions to adopt policies that limit funding of fossil fuels companies; and

International factors including political unrest which may reduce the prices of oil and gas.

We may not be able to sustainobtain such additional financing on the terms favorable to us, or increaseat all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

We require additional financingability to continue to support our operations. Such financingbusiness growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may only be availableadversely impacted. In addition, our inability to generate or obtain the financial resources needed may require us to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our operations and sell some of our assets. For example, in May 2021, we assigned certain of our working interests in oil and gas leases in exchange for $600,000 in order to obtain the necessary working capital. If we were forced to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our operations or sell a significant portion of our assets it would have a material adverse impact on disadvantageous terms,our business, operating results and financial condition.

Further, if we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or may not be available at all. Anyconvertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity or debt securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our Common Stock. Any debt financing that we may secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused and may continue to cause a significant disruption to the United States and global economy, and its continuation for any extended period of time may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and future prospects.

The global COVID-19 pandemic and the unprecedented actions taken by U.S. federal, state and local governments and governments around the world in order to stop the spread of the virus have had and continue to have a profound impact on the U.S. and global economy, disrupting global supply chains and creating significant volatility in the financial markets. The contraction of the economy caused by the pandemic has, among other things, severely impacted demand for fossil fuels resulting in sharp decline in oil and gas prices. Oil demand significantly deteriorated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding preventative measures taken around the world to mitigate its spread, including “shelter-in-place” orders, quarantines, executive orders and similar government orders and restrictions for their residents to control the spread of COVID-19.

Although oil prices have increased in the past few months due to, among other things, the Biden administration anti-fossil fuel agenda, the vaccine rollouts and the decision by OPEC to restrain output into mid-2021, there can be no assurance that this increase will continue.

Future disruptions and/or uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, among others, delays in vaccine rollouts and the emergence of new variants of the virus, for a sustained period of time could have a substantial dilutive effectmaterial adverse impact on our existing stockholders.business, our ability to execute our strategy and to realize the full benefits of the Banner Midstream acquisition. Our production and transportation businesses will likely be significantly affected if there is another reduction in oil prices or reduced demand for our services, caused by a global recession due to the ongoing effects of COVID-19. 

 

Furthermore, the effect of the pandemic on financial markets and on our Company may limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future on the terms acceptable to us at the time we need it, or at all.


We will need additional capital to support our operations and growth.

As of March 31, 2019,

Until we had cash of $244, a working capital deficit of $5,045, and an accumulated deficit of $115,886. Whileachieve sustained profitability, we expect cash will be provided by a $10,000 credit facility, we may need to raise additional capital and our cash position may decline in the future. We may not be successful in maintaining an adequate level of cash resources. We continue to seek additionalthrough public or private financing in ordertransactions or secure a debt facility to support our operations.operations and execute our growth strategy. We may not be able to obtain additional financing in sufficient amounts or on satisfactory terms acceptable to us, if at all. We could also be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or otherwise at all,an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable, and we may be required to relinquish rights to some of our current master service agreements or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us, any new equity financing couldof which may have a substantial dilutivematerial adverse effect on our existing stockholdersbusiness, operating results and or contain complex terms subject to derivative accounting. Ifprospects. Even if we cannot obtain additional financing, we will not be able to achieve the sales growthbelieve that we need to coverhave sufficient funds for our costs, and our results of operations would be negatively affected.current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations.

 

The Company, specifically Zest Labs,If we are able to close an equity financing, it may be very dilutive to our existing stockholders. There is engaged in discussions with potential customersno assurance that we will complete any financing or secure a debt facility. If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired and partnersmay be required to significantly increase revenues and expand operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statementscurtail, delay or discontinue one or more of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcomelines of the uncertainties.operations and/or sell more assets, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We cannot predict our future results because we have a limited operating history.

We acquired our oil and gas business on March 27, 2020, which currently accounts for almost all of our revenues. Given our limited operating history, it may be difficult to evaluate our future performance or prospects. You should consider the uncertainties that we may encounter as a company that should still be considered an early stage company. These uncertainties include:

 

 our ability to market our services and products for a profit;
our ability to recruit and retain skilled personnel;

 our ability to secure and retain key customers; and

 our evolving business model.

If we are not able to address successfully some or all of these uncertainties, we may not be able to expand our business, compete effectively or achieve profitability.

 

Recent salesBecause we must periodically evaluate our goodwill for impairment, we could be required to recognize non-cash impairment charges in future periods which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

A considerable portion of our consolidated assets consists of goodwill. The Company recorded approximately $3.2 million of goodwill in connection with the Trend Holdings acquisition in May 2019, and approximately $7.0 million in connection with the Banner Midstream acquisition in March 2020. We assess goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth fiscal quarter and whenever facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the Company’s goodwill may be impaired. Impairment analysis involves comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, we record an impairment charge. Determination of fair value requires considerable judgment and is sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions, estimates and market factors. Those assessments may be affected by (i) positive or negative reserve adjustments, (ii) results of drilling activities, (iii) management’s outlook for commodity prices and costs and expenses, (iv) changes in our market capitalization, (v) changes in our weighted average cost of capital and (vi) changes in income taxes. If we are required to recognize noncash charges related to impairment of goodwill, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected. 

14

Risk Factors Relating to Our Exploration and Production and Transportation Operations

We have significant ongoing capital requirements that could affect our profitability if we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms.

The Company has pre-funded approximately $5,800,000 of the cost, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387,000 has been expensed as drilling costs, and we expect to continue to incur expenses related to our previously announced joint drilling venture. In addition, our transportation business is capital intensive and asset heavy, and our policy of maintaining a young, technology-equipped fleet requires us to expend significant amounts in capital expenditures annually. We expect to pay for projected capital expenditures with cash flows from operations or the proceeds from equity sales. If we were unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, we would need to seek alternative sources of capital, including financing, to meet our capital requirements. In the event that we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms in the future, we may have to limit our fleet size, enter into less favorable financing arrangements or operate our revenue equipment for longer periods, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our profitability.

Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is intense, making it more difficult for us to market the oil and gas we produce, to acquire interests in new leases, to secure trained personnel and appropriate services, and to raise capital.

Banner Midstream is a relatively small participant in its industry and we face significant competition from major energy companies with substantial financial, management, technical and other resources as well as large and other privately held businesses which have competitive advantages. Our cost of operations is highly concentrateddependent on third-party services, and competition for these services can be significant, especially in times when commodity prices are rising.  Similarly, we compete for trained, qualified personnel, and in times of lower prices for the commodities we produce, we and other companies with similar production profiles may not be able to attract and retain this talent.  Our ability to acquire and develop reserves in the future will depend on our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a few major customers,highly competitive environment for acquiring properties, marketing oil and gas and securing trained personnel.  Also, there is substantial competition for capital available for investment in the oil and gas industry.  Our competitors may be able to pay more for personnel, property and services and to attract capital at lower rates.  This may become more likely if prices for natural gas increase faster than prices for oil, as oil comprises a greater percentage of our overall production and transportation business. Because of our small size, we may be more affected than larger competitors.

Unless we replace our existing reserves with new ones and develop those reserves, our reserves and production will decline, which would adversely affect our future cash flows and results of operations.

Producing oil reservoirs generally are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. Unless we conduct successful ongoing exploration and development activities or continually acquire properties containing proved reserves, our proved reserves will decline as those reserves are produced. Our future reserves and production, and therefore our future cash flow and results of operations, are highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing our current reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable reserves. We may not be able to develop, find or acquire sufficient additional reserves to replace our current and future production. If we are unable to replace our current and future production, the value of our reserves will decrease, and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.


Drilling for and producing crude oil involves significant risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our drilling and production activities are subject to many risks, including the risk that we will not discover commercially productive reservoirs. Drilling for crude oil can be unprofitable, not only from dry holes, but from productive wells that do not produce sufficient revenues to return a profit. In addition, our drilling and producing operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of other factors, including but not limited to:

unusual or unexpected geological formations and miscalculations;
fires;
explosions and blowouts;
pipe or cement failures;
environmental hazards, such as natural gas leaks, oil spills, pipeline and tank ruptures, encountering naturally occurring radioactive materials, and unauthorized discharges of toxic gases, brine, well stimulation and completion fluids, or other pollutants into the surface and subsurface environment;
loss of drilling fluid circulation;
title problems for the properties on which we drill and resulting restrictions or termination of lease for oil drilling and production operations;
facility or equipment malfunctions;
unexpected operational events, especially the need to drill significantly deeper than originally contemplated or finding, despite an engineering study to the contrary, that the drilling site is a dry hole that produces no appreciable amounts of crude oil or no crude oil;
shortages of skilled personnel or unexpected loss of key drilling and production workers;
shortages or delivery delays of equipment and services or of water used in hydraulic fracturing activities;
compliance with environmental and other regulatory requirements and any unexpected remedial requirements for violations of environmental or other regulatory requirements;
stockholder  activism and activities by non-governmental organizations to restrict the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas so as to minimize emissions of greenhouse gases of “GHG’s”;
natural disasters; and
adverse weather conditions.

Any of these risks can cause substantial losses, including personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution, environmental contamination, clean-up responsibilities, loss of wells, repairs to resume operations; and regulatory fines or penalties. Further, our exposure to operational risks may increase as our drilling activity expands.

We may not be insured or fully insured against certain of the above operational risks, either due to unavailability of such insurance or the high premiums and deductibles. The occurrence of an event that is not covered in full or in part by insurance could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Legislation, regulations or government actions related to climate change, greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability initiatives and other ESG laws, regulations and government action, could result in increased compliance and operating costs and reduced demand for fossil fuels, and concern in financial and investment markets over greenhouse gasses and fossil fuel production could adversely affect demand for our products, limit our access to capital and depress the price of our Common Stock.

Since he took office in January 2021, President Biden has signed a series of executive orders seeking to adopt new regulations to address climate change and to suspend, revise, or rescind certain prior agency actions which were part of the Trump Administration’s de-regulatory push, and the Biden Administration is expected to continue to aggressively seek to regulate the energy industry and seek to eliminate in time the use of fossil fuels. The new executive orders include, among other things, orders requiring a review of current federal lands leasing and permitting practices, as well as a temporary halt of new leasing of federal lands and offshore waters available for oil and gas exploration, directing federal agencies to eliminate subsidies for fossil fuels, and to develop a plan to improve climate-related disclosures.

In January 2021, President Biden also issued an executive order calling for methane emissions regulations to be reviewed and for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) to establish new standards by September 2021. The EPA has adopted regulations under existing provisions of the Clean Air Act that, among other things, establish Prevention of Significant Deterioration (the “PSD”), construction and Title V operating permit reviews for certain large stationary sources.  Facilities required to obtain PSD permits for their greenhouse gas emissions also will be required to meet “best available control technology” standards that will be established on a case-by-case basis.  The EPA also has adopted rules requiring the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from specified onshore and offshore natural gas and oil production sources in the United States on an annual basis, which include certain of our operations.

Although Congress from time to time has considered legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, there has not been significant activity in the form of adopted legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the federal level in recent years.  In the absence of such federal climate legislation, a number of states, including states in which we operate, have enacted or passed measures to track and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily through the planned development of greenhouse gas emission inventories and regional greenhouse gas cap-and-trade programs.  Most of these cap-and-trade programs require major customer wouldsources of emissions or major producers of fuels to acquire and surrender emission allowances, with the number of allowances available for purchase reduced each year until the overall greenhouse gas emission reduction goal is achieved.  These reductions may cause the cost of allowances to escalate significantly over time. We will be further subject to our regulatory efforts such as California announced goal of eliminating the sale of vehicles which use gas by 2035. Automobile manufacturers are beginning to announce that they will only manufacture electric vehicles in the future.

Additionally, the United States rejoined, effective February 19, 2021, the non-binding international treaty to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions (the “Paris Agreement”), adopted by over 190 countries in December 2015.  The Paris Agreement entered into force in November 2016 after more than 70 nations, including the United States, ratified or otherwise indicated their intent to be bound by the agreement. The United States had previously withdrawn from the Paris Agreement effective November 4, 2020. Following the United States rejoining the Paris Agreement, President Biden announced in April 2021 the United States’ pledge to achieve an approximately 50% reduction from 2005 levels in “economy-wide” net greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. To the extent that the United States implements this agreement or imposes other climate change regulations on the oil and natural gas industry, or that investors insist on compliance regardless of legal requirements, it could have an adverse effect on our business.business, operating results and future growth. In February 2021, the Acting Chair of the SEC issued a statement directing the Division of Corporation Finance to enhance its focus on climate-related disclosure in public company filings and in March 2021 the SEC announced the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force in the Division of Enforcement.


The adoption and implementation of these and other similar regulations could require us to incur material costs to monitor and report on greenhouse gas emissions or install new equipment to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases associated with our operations.  In addition, these regulatory initiatives could drive down demand for our products and services in the oil and gas industry by stimulating demand for alternative forms of energy that do not rely on combustion of fossil fuels that serve as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated financial condition.

Federal, state, and local legislative and regulatory initiatives in the United States relating to hydraulic fracturing or fracking could result in decreased demand for our transportation services, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Although we do not rely on hydraulic fracturing or fracking techniques in our exploration and production operations, our transportation business, which accounted for approximately 79% of our operating revenue in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, depends to a considerable extent on a continued use of such techniques. We expect to continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from our transportation operations for the foreseeable future.

In the United States, hydraulic fracturing is currently generally exempt from regulation under the Underground Injection Control program established under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, and is typically regulated by state oil and gas commissions or similar agencies. From time to time, the U.S. Congress has considered adopting legislation intended to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the additives used in the hydraulic-fracturing process. In addition, certain states have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations that could impose new or more stringent permitting, disclosure, disposal and well-construction requirements on hydraulic-fracturing operations. The adoption of any federal, state or local laws or the implementation of regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing could cause a decrease in the completion of new oil and gas wells and an associated decrease in demand for our transportation services, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our operating results fluctuate due to the effect of seasonality in the oil and gas industry.

Operating levels of the oil industry have historically been lower in the winter months because of adverse weather conditions. Accordingly, our revenue generally follows a seasonal pattern. Revenue can also be affected by other adverse weather conditions, holidays and the number of business days during a given period because revenue is directly related to the available working days. From time to time, we may also suffer short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, earthquakes, and explosions that could harm our results of operations or make our results of operations more volatile.

We may be subject to various claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, and increases in the amount or severity of these claims and lawsuits could adversely affect us.

We are exposed to various claims and litigation related to commercial disputes, personal injury, property damage, environmental liability and other matters. Proceedings include claims by third parties, and certain proceedings have been certified or purport to be class actions. Developments in regulatory, legislative or judicial standards, material changes to litigation trends, or a catastrophic accident or series of accidents, involving any or all of property damage, personal injury, and environmental liability could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.

The extension of our active oil and gas mineral leases may be subject to performing continuous drilling operations.

Our oil and gas mineral leases may contain acreage that is either held by production or not. In order to extend the leased acreage not held by production, the Company must maintain minimum continuous drilling operations in order to extend these leases to future periods. The Company’s inability to perform operations during any given period could result in the Company’s losing the rights to future operations on that lease.


The potential lack of availability of, or cost of, drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and crude oil field services could adversely affect our ability to execute on a timely basis our exploration and development plans within our budget.

When the prices of crude oil increase, or the demand for equipment and services is greater than the supply in certain areas, we could encounter an increase in the cost of securing drilling rigs, equipment and supplies. In addition, larger producers may be more likely to secure access to such equipment by offering more lucrative terms. If we are unable to acquire access to such resources, or can obtain access only at higher prices, our ability to convert our reserves into cash flow could be delayed and the cost of producing those reserves could increase significantly, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our exploration and production and transportation operations are subject to stringent environmental, oil and gas-related and occupational safety and health laws and regulations, and noncompliance with such laws and regulations could expose us to material costs and liabilities.

Our exploration and production operations are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the drilling activities, production rates, the size and shape of drilling and spacing units or proration units, the transportation and sale of crude oil, gas, and the discharging of materials into the environment and environmental protection. These laws and regulations may limit the amount of oil and gas we can produce or limit the number of wells or the locations where we can drill.

Further, we are required to obtain and maintain numerous environmental and oil and gas-related permits, approvals and certificates from various federal, state and local governmental agencies in connection with our exploration and production operations, and may incur substantial costs in doing so. The need to obtain permits could potentially delay, curtail or cease the development of oil and gas projects. The Company may in the future be charged royalties on gas emissions or required to incur certain capital expenditures for air pollution control equipment or other air emissions-related issues. Additionally, our operations are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal occupational safety and health and comparable state statutes, aimed at protecting the health and safety of employees.

We are also subject to various environmental laws and regulations dealing with the hauling and handling of hazardous materials, air emissions from our vehicles and facilities, and engine idling and discharge. Our transportation operations often involve traveling on unpaved roads located in rural areas, increasing the risk of accidents, and our staging pads often are located in areas where groundwater or other forms of environmental contamination could occur. Our operations involve the risks of environmental damage and hazardous waste disposal, among others. If we are involved in an accident involving hazardous substances, if there are releases of hazardous substances we transport, if soil or groundwater contamination is found at our facilities or results from our operations, or if we are found to be in violation of applicable environmental laws or regulations, we could owe cleanup costs and incur related liabilities, including substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may subject the Company to sanctions, including administrative, civil or criminal penalties, remedial cleanups or corrective actions, delays in permitting or performance of projects, natural resource damages and other liabilities. In addition, these laws and regulations may be amended and additional laws and regulations may be adopted in the future with more stringent legal requirements.

Because oil prices are highly volatile, any sustained decline in oil prices could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our capital expenditure obligations and financial commitments.

Our future revenues from exploration and production operations, profitability, cash flows, future growth and carrying value of our oil and gas properties will depend on oil prices. Commodity prices, including oil, are highly volatile and may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand and market uncertainty. Additional factors which may affect oil prices and which are beyond our control include but are not limited to, the following factors:

worldwide and regional economic conditions impacting the global supply of and demand for oil, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;


the price and quantity of foreign imports of oil;

consumer and business demand;

political and economic conditions in or affecting other producing regions or countries, including the Middle East, Africa, South America and Russia;

actions of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, its members and other state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and production controls;

the level of global exploration, development and production;

the level of global inventories;

prevailing prices on local price indexes in the area in which we operate;

the proximity, capacity, cost and availability of gathering and transportation facilities;

localized and global supply and demand fundamentals and transportation availability;

the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and transporting reserves;

weather conditions and other natural disasters;

technological advances affecting energy consumption;

the price and availability of alternative fuels;

government regulations, such as regulation of natural gas transportation and price controls;

U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. governmental regulation and taxes; and

market perceptions of future prices, whether due to the foregoing factors or others.

While lower oil prices are helpful to our transportation business since it reduces our costs, it has an inverse effect on our exploration and production business. Lower commodity prices may reduce our cash flows and borrowing ability. If we are unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms, our ability to develop future reserves could be adversely affected. Also, using lower prices in estimating proved reserves may result in a reduction in proved reserve volumes due to economic limits.

If we are required to curtail our drilling program, we may be unable to continue to hold leases that are scheduled to expire, which may further reduce our reserves. As a result, a substantial or extended decline in commodity prices may materially and adversely affect our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to finance planned capital expenditures.

Conservation measures and technological advances could reduce demand for oil and natural gas.

Fuel conservation measures, alternative requirements, future legislation and regulation increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil, and natural gas, technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices could reduce demand for oil. The impact of the changing demand for oil may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


We may be required to record significant non-cash impairment charges related to a reduction in the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

We will perform assessments of our oil and gas properties whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. In order to perform these assessments, management will use various observable and unobservable inputs, including management’s outlooks for (i) proved reserves and risk-adjusted probable and possible reserves, (ii) commodity prices, (iii) production costs, (iv) capital expenditures and (v) production. Significant or extended price declines could result in the need to adjust the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties by recording non-cash impairment charges. To the extent such assessments indicate a reduction of the estimated useful life or estimated future cash flows, the carrying value of the oil and gas properties may not be recoverable and therefore we may be required to record an impairment charge reducing the carrying value of the proved properties to their fair value. If oil and natural gas prices decline in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges related to the oil and gas properties acquired as part of the Banner Acquisition, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations in the period incurred.

Our future revenue will depend upon the size of the markets which we target and our ability to achieve continuous and sufficient market acceptance.

Even if we enter all necessary agreements with key customers in the oil industry and purchase enough equipment to satisfy the demand for freight services in the market, our future revenue will depend upon the size of the markets which we target and our ability to achieve continuous and sufficient market acceptance, and such factors as pricing, reimbursement from third-party payors and adequate market share for our services at the target markets.

We anticipate that the Banner Midstream expenses will increase substantially if and as they:

continue the research of the market and potential private companies to acquire;
expand the scope of our operations in the Territory;
establish a supply-demand chain and a respective trucking infrastructure to commercialize our market opportunities;
acquire existing businesses and revitalize their operations with the Companies framework;
seek to maintain, protect, and expand the Territory;
seek to attract and retain skilled personnel; and
create additional infrastructure to support our operations as a public company and plan future commercialization efforts.

We may not be able to successfully identify acquisition targets and complete strategic acquisitions to execute our growth strategy, and even if we are able to do so, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions.

As part of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue opportunities to acquire companies or assets that will enable us to expand our product and service offerings and to increase our geographic footprint. We routinely review potential acquisitions. However, identifying suitable acquisition targets can be difficult, costly and time-consuming, and we may not be able to do so or complete acquisitions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis or at all. Even if completed, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions. Our acquisitions have previously required, and any similar future transactions may also require, significant efforts and expenditures, in particular with respect to integration of acquired assets and business into our legacy operations. We may encounter unexpected difficulties, or incur unexpected costs, in connection with strategic acquisitions and integration efforts, including without limitation:

difficulties in the post-acquisition integration of operations and systems;


the termination of relationships with key personnel and customers of the acquired company;
a failure to add additional employees to manage the increased volume of business;
additional post acquisition challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning, treasury management, financial reporting and legal compliance;

risks and liabilities from our acquisitions, some of which may not be discovered during the pre-acquisition due diligence process;
a disruption of our ongoing business or an inability of our ongoing business to receive sufficient management attention; and
a failure to realize the cost savings or other financial benefits we anticipated prior to acquisition.

Failure to successfully identify suitable acquisition targets, complete strategic acquisitions, or realize the anticipated benefits of completed acquisitions, would undermine our ability to execute on our growth strategy, which would in turn have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and future prospects.

Because we have limited experience operating our oil and gas exploration and transportation businesses, our failure to effectively manage the risks and challenges inherent in such businesses could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and growth prospects.

Until we acquired Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020, we had no experience in operating its oil and gas businesses. Although Jay Puchir, Banner Midstream’s Chief Executive Officer joined us initially as our Chief Accounting Officer and then Treasurer and has continued to run the oil and gas businesses following the Banner Midstream acquisition, and Julia Olguin was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of White River Holdings Corp (“White River”), our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, we have limited experience operating these businesses, and, as a result, may encounter challenges and risks inherent in operating such businesses. If we fail to effectively manage the risks and challenges inherent in such businesses, our business, operating results, financial condition and growth prospects would be materially and adversely affected.


Our transportation business is affected by industry-wide economic factors that are largely outside our control.

With the exception of minimal revenue from our investment advisory business, our revenue is from customers in the oil exploration and production industry. As such, our volumes are largely dependent on the economy and our results may be more susceptible to trends in unemployment and how it affects oil prices than carriers that do not have this focus. We believe that some of the most significant factors beyond our control that may negatively impact our operating results are economic changes that affect supply and demand in transportation markets.

The risks associated with these factors are heightened when the United States economy is weakened. Some of the principal risks during such times are as follows:

low overall demand levels, which may impair our asset utilization;

customers with credit issues and cash flow problems we are not currently aware of;

customers bidding out our services or selecting competitors that offer lower rates, in an attempt to lower their costs, forcing us to lower our rates or lose revenue; and

more unbilled miles incurred to obtain loads.

Economic conditions that decrease shipping demand or increase the supply of capacity in the trucking transportation industry on the Territory can exert downward pressure on rates and equipment utilization, thereby decreasing asset productivity. Declining freight levels and rates, a prolonged recession or general economic instability could result in declines in our results of operations, which declines may be material.

We also are subject to cost increases outside our control that could materially reduce our profitability if we are unable to increase our rates sufficiently. Such cost increases include, but are not limited to, fuel and energy prices, driver wages, taxes and interest rates, tolls, license and registration fees, insurance premiums, regulations, revenue equipment and related maintenance costs and healthcare and other benefits for our associates. We cannot predict whether, or in what form, any such cost increase or event could occur. Any such cost increase or event could adversely affect our profitability.

In addition, events outside our control, such as strikes or other work stoppages at our facilities or at customer, port, border or other shipping locations, weather, actual or threatened armed conflicts or terrorist attacks, efforts to combat terrorism, military action against a foreign state or group located in a foreign state or heightened security requirements could lead to reduced economic demand, reduced availability of credit or temporary closing of shipping locations or United States borders. Such events or enhanced security measures in connection with such events could impair our operations and result in higher operating costs.

Fluctuations in the price or availability of fuel, the volume and terms of diesel fuel purchase commitments and surcharge collection may increase our costs related to our transportation operations, which could materially and adversely affect our margins.

Fuel represents a significant expense for our transportation business while the sale of oil and to a lesser extent natural gas provides revenues for our business. Diesel fuel prices fluctuate greatly due to factors beyond our control, such as political events, terrorist activities, armed conflicts, depreciation of the dollar against other currencies and weather, such as hurricanes, and other natural or man-made disasters, each of which may lead to an increase in the cost of fuel. Fuel prices also are affected by the rising demand in developing countries and could be adversely impacted by diminished drilling activity and by the use of crude oil and oil reserves for other purposes. Such events may lead not only to increases in fuel prices, but also to fuel shortages and disruptions in the fuel supply chain. Because our operations are dependent upon diesel fuel, and a portion of our business is based on fuel purchased on the spot market at prevailing market rates, significant diesel fuel cost increases, shortages or supply disruptions could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.


Increases in fuel costs, to the extent not offset by rate per mile increases or fuel surcharges, have an adverse effect on our operations and profitability. While a portion of our fuel costs are covered by pass-through provisions in customer contracts and compensatory fuel surcharge programs, we also incur fuel costs that cannot be recovered even with respect to customers with which we maintain fuel surcharge programs, such as those associated with unbilled miles, or the time when our engines are idling. Because our fuel surcharge recovery lags behind changes in fuel prices, our fuel surcharge recovery may not capture the increased costs we pay for fuel, especially when prices are rising, leading to fluctuations in our levels of reimbursement. Further, during periods of low freight volumes, shippers can use their negotiating leverage to impose less compensatory fuel surcharge policies. In addition, the terms of each customer’s fuel surcharge agreement vary, and customers may seek to modify the terms of their fuel surcharge agreements to minimize recoverability for fuel price increases. Such fuel surcharges may not be maintained indefinitely or may not be sufficiently effective. As of the date of this prospectus, we had no derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to fuel price fluctuations.

If we fail to retain and attract qualified drivers, including owner-operators, it could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In our transportation operations, we rely almost exclusively on the fleet of vehicles owned and operated by independent contractors. These independent contractors are responsible for maintaining and operating their own equipment and paying their own fuel, insurance, licenses and other operating costs. Due to high turnover rates, the pool of qualified independent contractor drivers is often limited, which increases competition for their services, especially during times of increased economic activity. We currently face and may in the future continue to face from time- to-time, difficulty in attracting and retaining sufficient number of qualified independent contractor drivers. Additionally, our agreements with independent contractor drivers are terminable by either party without penalty and upon short notice. Our specialty equipment services targeting servicing oil exploration and oil development industries require special training to handle unique operating requirements. We may be legally obligated or otherwise subjected by the industry standards to use physical function tests and hair follicle and urine testing to screen and test all driver applicants, which we believe is a rigorous standard and could decrease the pool of qualified applicants available to us. If we are unable to retain our existing independent contractor drivers or recruit new qualified independent contractor drivers, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The rates we offer our independent contractor drivers are subject to market conditions. Accordingly, we may be required to increase owner-operator compensation or take other measures to retain existing and attract new qualified independent contractor drivers. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain a sufficient number of independent contractor drivers, we could be required to increase our mileage rates and accessorial pay or operate with fewer trucks and face difficulty meeting our clients’ demands, which would in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

If owner-operators and their drivers that we rely upon in our transportation business were to be classified as employees instead of independent contractors, our business would be materially and adversely affected.

A number of companies in the logistics industry have been faced with legislation that requires that many independent contractors be treated as employees and receive benefits only available to employees which increases costs. To date, this legislation has been limited to California and is being considered in states where we do not operate. Some companies recently been involved in lawsuits, including class actions, and state tax and other administrative proceedings that claim that owner-operators or their drivers should be treated as employees, rather than independent contractors. These lawsuits and proceedings involve substantial monetary damages (including claims for unpaid wages, overtime, failure to provide meal and rest periods, unreimbursed business expenses and other items), injunctive relief, or both. While we believe that owner-operators and their drivers are properly classified as independent contractors rather than as employees, if their independent contractor status is challenged, we may not be successful in defending against such challenges in some or all jurisdictions in which we offer transportation services. We also may encounter a risk if the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) were to pass a rule to this effect, which could occur under the Boden administration. Furthermore, the costs associated with defending or resolving lawsuits relating to the independent contractor status of owner-operators and their drivers could be material to our business.


If legislation is passed in states where we operate, the NLRB passes a rule, or a court or an administrative agency were to determine that owner-operators and their drivers must be classified as employees rather than independent contractors, we could become subject to additional regulatory requirements, including but not limited to tax, wages, and wage and hour laws and requirements (such as those pertaining to minimum wage and overtime); employee benefits, social security, workers’ compensation and unemployment; discrimination, harassment, and retaliation under civil rights laws; claims under laws pertaining to unionizing, collective bargaining, and other concerted activity; and other laws and regulations applicable to employers and employees. Compliance with such laws and regulations would require us to incur significant additional expenses, potentially including without limitation, expenses associated with the application of wage and hour laws (including minimum wage, overtime, and meal and rest period requirements), employee benefits, social security contributions, taxes, and penalties. Additionally, any such reclassification would require us to change our business model, and consequently have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Similar to many companies, we have experienced a spike in our insurance costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Insurance premiums have recently escalated, and we are facing a similar increase in our insurance costs. Our future insurance and claims expense might exceed historical levels, which could reduce our earnings. We self-insure or maintain a high deductible for a portion of our claims exposure resulting from workers’ compensation, auto liability, general liability, cargo and property damage claims, as well as associate health insurance. Estimating the number and severity of claims, as well as related judgment or settlement amounts is inherently difficult. This, along with legal expenses, incurred but not reported claims and other uncertainties can cause unfavorable differences between actual claim costs and our reserve estimates. We plan to reserve for anticipated losses and expenses and periodically evaluate and adjust our claims reserves to reflect our experience. However, ultimate results may differ from our estimates, which could result in losses over our reserved amounts.

We maintain insurance with licensed insurance carriers above the amounts which we retain. Although we believe our aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, the amount of one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. If any claim were to exceed our coverage, we would be required to bear the excess, in addition to our other self-insured/retained amounts. As a result, our insurance and claims expense could increase, or we could raise our self-insured retention or deductible when our policies are renewed or replaced. Our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if (i) cost per claim, premiums, or the number of claims significantly exceed our estimates, (ii) there is one or more claims in excess of our coverage limits, (iii) our insurance carriers refuse to pay our insurance claims or (iv) we experience a claim for which coverage is not provided.

Risks Factors Relating to Our Technology Solutions

Our ability to execute our strategy with respect to our technology segment, depends to a large extent on the outcome of the litigation related to protection of our intellectual property rights.

 

As previously disclosed, in April 2021, a federal jury found in our consolidated financial statements, salesfavor on three claims and awarded us damages in the amount of $115 million in the lawsuit against Walmart Inc. Specifically, the jury found that Walmart misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to major customers represent significant percentagescomply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. We had filed the complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of total sales. SuchArkansas, Western Division, in August 2018. The complaint included claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 27, 2021, we filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Central Division a loss couldmotion for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $46 million or alternatively, $13,537,000, pre-judgment interest in the amount of $16,701,000 and 0.06% post-judgment interest, accruing from April 13, 2021.


Additionally, we expect to file an appeal arguing among other things, that we should have a negative impact onan opportunity to prove the full extent of our businessdamages. We expect that Walmart will appeal the jury verdict and cash flows.any award of attorneys’ fees. Intellectual property and similar litigation is subject to uncertainty. There is no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts related to this lawsuit or if we are, which amounts we will be able to recover.

 

If we are unable to develop and generate additional demand for our technology services or products, we will likely suffer serious harm to our business.

 

We have invested significant resources in developing and marketing our technology services and products. Some of our services and products are often considered complex and involve a new approach to the conduct of business by our customers. As a result, intensive marketing and sales efforts may be necessary to educate prospective customers regarding the uses and benefits of our services and products in order to generate additional demand. The market for our services and products may weaken, competitors may develop superior offerings, or we may fail to develop acceptable solutions to address new market conditions. Any one of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

 

Undetected errors or failures in our software, products or services could result in loss or delay in the market acceptance for our products or lost sales.

 

Because our software services and products, and the environments in which they operate, are complex, our software and products may contain errors that can be detected at any point in its lifecycle. While we continually test our services and products for errors, errors may be found at any time in the future. Detection of any significant errors may result in, among other things, loss of, or delay in, market acceptance and sales of our services and products, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation, increased service and warranty costs, license terminations or renegotiations or costly litigation. Additionally, because our services and products support or rely on other systems and applications, any software or hardware errors or defects in these systems or applications may result in errors in the performance of our service or products, and it may be difficult or impossible to determine where the error resides.

We may not be competitive, and increased competition could seriously harm our business.

Relative to us, some of our current competitors or potential competitors of our products and services may have one or more of the following advantages:

longer operating histories;
greater financial, technical, marketing, sales and other resources;
positive cash flows from operations;
greater name recognition;
a broader range of products to offer;
an established intellectual property portfolio;
a larger installed base of customers;
superior customer service;
higher levels of quality and reliability;
dependable and efficient distribution networks; and
competitive product and services pricing.

Although no single competitive factor is dominant, current and potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to enhance their offerings that are competitive with our products and services, which may result in increased competition. We cannot assure that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors. Increased competition in mobile data capture products, software, and related products and solutions, or supplies may result in price reductions, low gross profit margins, and loss of market share, and could require increased spending on research and development, sales and marketing, and customer support. Some competitors may make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships with suppliers or companies that produce complementary products, which may create additional pressures on our competitive position in the marketplace.

Sales to many of our target customers involve long sales and implementation cycles, which may cause revenues and operating results to vary significantly.

 

A prospective customer’s decision to purchase our services or products may often involve lengthy evaluation and product qualification processes. Throughout the sales cycle, we anticipate often spending considerable time educating and providing information to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of our services and products. Budget constraints and the need for multiple approvals within these organizations may also delay the purchase decision. Failure to obtain the timely required approval for a particular project or purchase decision may delay the purchase of our services or products. As a result, we expect that the sales cycle for some of our services and products will typically range to more than 360 days, depending on the availability of funding to the prospective customer. These long cycles may cause delays in any potential sale, and we may spend a large amount of time and resources on prospective customers who decide not to purchase our services or products, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

 

Additionally, some of our services and products are designed for corporate customers, which requireswill require us to maintainrecruit a sales force that understands the needs of these customers, engagesengage in extensive negotiations and providesprovide support to complete sales. If we do not successfully market our services and products to these targeted customers, our operating results will be below our expectations and the expectations of investors and market analysts, which would likely cause the price of our common stockCommon Stock to decline.

 


We will not be ablePatents, trademarks, copyrights and licenses are important to developour technology business, and the inability to defend, obtain or continue our business if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.renew such intellectual property could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

 

Our future success depends on our abilityThrough Zest Labs, the Company currently holds rights to attract, hire, trainpatents and retaincopyrights relating to certain aspects of its RFID technology, software, and services. In addition, the Company has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of highly skilled employeesforeign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services”, the Zest logo, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Although the Company believes the ownership of such patents, copyrights, trademarks and service marks is an important factor in its business and that its success does depend in part on the serviceownership thereof, the Company relies primarily on the innovative skills, technical competence, and performancemarketing abilities of our senior management teamits personnel.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to include intellectual property obtained from third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and other key personnel. The lossbusiness methods, the Company believes, based upon past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that such licenses could be obtained at all. Loss of a significant number of licenses may have an adverse effect of the services of our executive officers or other key employees could adversely affect our business. Competition for qualified personnel possessing the skills necessary to implement our strategy is intense, and we may fail to attract or retain the employees necessary to execute our business model successfully. We have obtained “key person” life insurance policies covering certain employees.Company’s operations.

 

Our success will dependThe Company relies on licenses to a significant degree uponthird-party patents and intellectual property, and the continued contributionsCompany’s future results could be materially adversely affected if it is alleged or found to have infringed intellectual property rights.

Many of our key management, engineeringZest Labs’ products are designed to use third-party intellectual property, and other personnel, manyit may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of whomits products and business methods. Although the Company believes that, based on past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, there is no assurance that the necessary licenses would be difficult to replace. In particular, we believe that our future success is highly dependent on Randy May, our Chief Executive Officer, and Peter Mehring, President of Zest Labs. If Messrs. May or Mehring, or any other key members of our management team, leave our employment, our business could suffer, and the share price of our common stock could decline.

Our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks.

We intend to pursue continued growth through opportunities to acquire companies or assets that will enable us to expand our product and service offerings and to increase our geographic footprint. We routinely review potential acquisitions. However, we may be unable to implement this growth strategy if we cannot reach agreement on potential strategic acquisitionsavailable on acceptable terms or for other reasons. Moreover, our acquisition strategy involves certain risks, including: 

difficulties in the post-acquisition integration of operations and systems;

the termination of relationships with key personnel and customers of the acquired company;

a failure to add additional employees to manage the increased volume of business;

additional post acquisition challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning, treasury management, financial reporting and legal compliance;

risks and liabilities from our acquisitions, some of which may not be discovered during the pre-acquisition due diligence process;

a disruption of our ongoing business or an inability of our ongoing business to receive sufficient management attention; and

a failure to realize the cost savings or other financial benefits we anticipated prior to acquisition.

Future acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on current attractive market terms.at all.

 

If we do notfail to protect our proprietary information and prevent third parties from making unauthorized use of our products and technology, our financial results could be harmed.

 

Much of our software and underlying technology is proprietary. We seek to protect our proprietary rights through a combination of confidentiality agreements and through copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws. However, all of these measures afford only limited protection and may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented by third parties. Any patent licensed by us or issued to us could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or rights granted thereunder may not provide a competitive advantage to us. Furthermore, patent applications that we file may not result in issuance of a patent or, if a patent is issued, the patent may not be issued in a form that is advantageous to us. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights, others may independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around our patents and other rights. In addition, it is difficult to monitor compliance with, and enforce, our intellectual property in a cost-effective manner.


Third parties claiming that we infringe on their proprietary rights could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and prevent us from selling our products and services.

 

From time to time, we might receive claimsthird parties may claim that we have infringed theon their intellectual property rights, of others, including claims regarding patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Because of constant technological change in the markets in which we compete, the extensive patent coverage of existing technologies, and the rapid rate of issuance of new patents, it is possible that the number of these claims may grow.In addition, former employers of our former, current, or future employees may assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosed to us the confidential or proprietary information of these former employers. Any such claim, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation and distract management from day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in defending such claims, we could be required to stop selling, delay shipments of, or redesign our products, pay monetarysignificant amounts as monetary damages, enter into royalty or licensing arrangements, or satisfy indemnification obligations that we have with some of our customers. We cannot assure you that any royaltyRoyalty or licensing arrangements that we may seek in such circumstances willmay not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We may incur significant expenditures to investigate, defend and settle claims related to the use of technology and intellectual property rights as part of our strategy to manage this risk.

 


PeriodsWe rely on third-party manufacturers for the final assembly of sustained economic adversity and uncertainty could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Demand for our services and products depend in large part upon the level of capital and maintenance expenditures by manycertain of our customers. Lower budgets could have a material adverse effectproduct related to our technology offerings. If these third-party manufacturers were to become unavailable, we may not be able to replace them on the demand for our services and products,economical terms or at all, and our business results of operations, cash flow and overall financial condition would suffer.

Disruptions in the financial markets may have an adverse impact on regional and world economies and credit markets, which could negatively impact the availability and cost of capital for us and our customers. These conditions may reduce the willingness or ability of our customers and prospective customers to commit funds to purchase our services or products, or their ability to pay for our services after purchase. These conditions could result in bankruptcy or insolvency for some customers, which would impact our revenue and cash collections. These conditions could also result in pricing pressure and less favorable financial terms in our contracts and our ability to access capital to fund our operations.

Patents, trademarks, copyrights and licenses are important to the Company’s business, and the inability to defend, obtain or renew such intellectual property could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

The Company currently holds rights to patents and copyrights relating to certain aspects of its RFID technology, software, and services. In addition, the Company has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services”, the Zest logo, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Although the Company believes the ownership of such patents, copyrights, trademarks and service marks is an important factor in its business and that its success does depend in part on the ownership thereof, the Company relies primarily on the innovative skills, technical competence, and marketing abilities of its personnel. Loss of a significant number of licenses may have an adverse effect of the Company’s operations.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to include intellectual property obtained from third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods, the Company believes, based upon past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that such licenses could be obtained at all.

Final assembly of certain products is performed by third-party manufacturers. We may be dependent on these third-party manufacturers as a sole-source of supply for the manufacture of such products.harmed.

 

A failure by such manufacturers to provide manufacturing services to us, or any disruption in such manufacturing services, may adversely affect our business results.business. We may incur increased business disruption risk due to the dependence on these third-party manufacturers, as we are not able to exercise direct control over the assembly or related operations of certain of our products. If these third-party manufacturers experience businessfinancial difficulties or fail to meet our manufacturing needs, then we may be unable to satisfy customer product demands, lose sales, and be unable to maintain customer relationships. Longer production lead times may result in shortages of certain products and inadequate inventories during periods of unanticipated higher demand. Without such third parties continuing to manufacture our products, we may have no other means of final assembly of certain of our products until we are able to secure the manufacturing capability at another facility or develop an alternative manufacturing facility. This transition could be costly and time consuming.


Failure of information technology systems and breaches in data security could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

 

Information technology system failures and breaches of data security could disrupt the Company’s operations by causing delays or cancellation of customer orders, impeding the manufacture or shipment of products, or resulting in the unintentional disclosure of customer or Company information. Management has taken steps to address these concerns by implementing sophisticated network security and internal control measures. There can be no assurance, however, that a system failure or data security breach will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

Failure in our operational systems or cyber security attacks on any of our facilities, or those of third parties, may adversely affect our financial results.

Our business is dependent upon our operational systems to process a large amount of data and complex transactions. If any of our financial, operational, or other data processing systems fail or have other significant shortcomings, our financial results could be adversely affected. Our financial results could also be adversely affected if an employee causes our operational systems to fail, either as a result of inadvertent error or by deliberately tampering with or manipulating our operational systems. Due to increased technology advances, we have become more reliant on technology to help increase efficiency in our business. We use computer programs to help run our financial and operations sectors, and this may subject our business to increased risks. Any future cyber security attacks that affect our facilities, our customers and any financial data could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, cyber-attacks on our customer and employee data may result in a financial loss, including potential fines for failure to safeguard data, and may negatively impact our reputation. Third-party systems on which we rely could also suffer operational system failure. Any of these occurrences could disrupt our business, result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise have an adverse effect on our financial results.

The Company relies on licenses to third-party patents and intellectual property, and the Company’s future results could be materially adversely affected if it is alleged or found to have infringed intellectual property rights.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to use third-party intellectual property, and it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods. Although the Company believes that, based on past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, there is no assurance that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable terms or at all.

The Company is subject to risks associated with laws, regulations and industry-imposed standards related to wireless communications devices.

Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the many jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Such changes, which could include but are not limited to restrictions on production, manufacture, distribution, and use of the device, may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

 

Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

 

Because of technological changes in the business software, web and device applications, sensors and sensor-based devices, and RFID and wireless communication industries, current extensive patent coverage, and the rapid issuance of new patents, it is possible that certain components of Zest Labs’ products and business methods may unknowingly infringe the patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. From time to time, Zest Labs may be notified that it may be infringing such rights. Responding to such claims, regardless of their merit, can consume significant time and expense. In certain cases, the Company may consider the desirability of entering into licensing agreements, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. If there is a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting the Company from marketing or selling certain products or a successful claim of infringement against the Company requires it to pay royalties to a third party, the Company’s financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

 

The inability to obtain certain components could adversely impact the Company’s ability to deliver on its contractual commitments which could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.

 

Although most components essential to the Company’s business are generally available from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID custom integrated circuits, and application-specific integrated circuits are currently obtained by the Company from single or limited sources. Some key components, while currently available to the Company from multiple sources, are at times subject to industry-wide availability constraints and pricing pressures. If the supply of a key or single-sourced component to the Company were to be delayed or curtailed or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delayed shipment of completed products to the Company, the Company’s ability to ship related products in desired quantities, and in a timely manner, could be adversely affected. The Company’s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source, or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source. Continued availability of these components may be affected if suppliers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the Company’s requirements. The Company attempts to mitigate these potential risks by working closely with these and other key suppliers on product introduction plans, strategic inventories, coordinated product introductions, and internal and external manufacturing schedules and levels. Consistent with industry practice, the Company acquires components through a combination of formal purchase orders, supplier contracts, and open orders based on projected demand information. However, adverse changes in the supply chain of the Company’s vendors may adversely impact the supply of key components.


28

RISK FACTORS RELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS

General Risks

Our future success depends on our ability to retain and attract high-quality personnel, and the efforts, abilities and continued service of our senior management.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain a number of highly skilled employees and on the service and performance of our senior management team and other key personnel, including service center managers. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees and inadequate succession planning could cause substantial disruption to our business operations, deplete our institutional knowledge base and erode our competitive advantage, which would adversely affect our business. Competition for qualified personnel possessing the skills necessary to implement our strategy is intense, and we may fail to attract or retain the employees necessary to execute our business model successfully. We do not have “key person” life insurance policies covering any of our executive officers, other than Peter Mehring, the president of Zest Labs.

Our success will depend to a significant degree upon the continued efforts of our key management, engineering and other personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. In particular, we believe that our future success is highly dependent on Randy May, our Chief Executive Officer, William Hoagland, our Chief Financial Officer, Jay Puchir, our Treasurer and CEO and President of Banner Midstream Corp., Peter Mehring, President of Zest Labs, and Julia Olguin, the Chief Executive Officer of White River. If any members of our management team leave our employment, our business could suffer, and the share price of our Common Stock could decline.

If we cannot manage our growth effectively, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We have recently experienced significant growth commencing with and following the Banner Acquisition. Our business model relies on our rapidly growing our oil and gas drilling and transportation businesses. Businesses that grow rapidly often have difficulty managing their growth while maintaining their compliance and quality standards. If we continue to grow as rapidly as we anticipate, we will need to expand our management by recruiting and employing additional executive and key personnel capable of providing the necessary support. There can be no assurance that our management, along with our staff, will be able to effectively manage our growth. Our failure to meet the challenges associated with rapid growth could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

  

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which requires, among other things, that public companies maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.

Although our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2021, any failure to maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement in the future could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired, which could result in loss of investor confidence and could have an adverse effect on our stock price.


Failure of information technology systems or data security breaches, including as the result of cyber security attacks, affecting us, our business associates, or our industry, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We depend on information technology systems and services in conducting our business. We and others in the industries in which we operate use these technologies for internal purposes, including data storage and processing, transmissions, as well as in our interactions with our business associates. Examples of these digital technologies include analytics, automation, and cloud services. If any of our financial, operational, or other data processing systems are compromised, fail or have other significant shortcomings, it could disrupt our business, require us to incur substantial additional expenses, result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise have a substantial numbermaterial adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

For example, the operator of authorized commonthe Colonial Pipeline was forced to pay $4.4 million in ransom to hackers as the result of a cyberattack disabling the pipeline for several days in May 2021. The attack also resulted in gasoline price increases and preferred shares availableshortages across the East Coast of the United States. As we depend on the availability and price of gasoline in our transportation business, any significant increase in the price and/or shortage of gasoline would have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Because our Common Stock trades on the OTCQB, we are subject to the unwillingness of most institutional investors to purchase our Common Stock as well as the general limited liquidity of that trading market.

Our Common Stock is currently traded on the OTCQB, which is not a national securities exchange. Most institutional investors will only purchase securities which trade on one of the markets operated by the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange. As a result, the OTCQB is generally less liquid than the leading stock exchanges. While the market for our Common Stock has been relatively active, we believe our failure to be listed on a leading national securities exchange has reduced our liquidity. We cannot assure you that our recent liquidity will be maintained or that investors will not encounter difficulties in selling their Common Stock in the future issuance that could cause dilutionat present levels or if the absence of sufficient liquidity will harm our stockholders in the future.

Future sales of our stockholders’ interestsCommon Stock in the public market could lower the price of our Common Stock and adversely impact the rightsimpair our ability to raise funds in future securities offerings.

Of 22,820,573 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 15, 2021, approximately 17,832,456 shares are held by investors who are not our affiliates or holders of our commonrestricted stock.

We have a total All of 100,000these shares of commonunrestricted stock and 5,000 shares of preferred stock authorized for issuance. As of August 8, 2019, we have shares of common stock issued and outstanding and no preferred shares issued or outstanding. As of August 16, 2019, we had 37,652 shares of common stock and 5,000 shares of preferred stock available for issuance. Further, out of the unissued shares of common stock, as of August 16, 2019, we have unexercised options for 7,139 shares. Up to 3,529are freely tradeable. The remaining shares may be issued uponsold subject to the exercisevolume limits of warrants. We may seek financing that could resultRule 144 which limits sales by any affiliate to 1% of outstanding shares in the issuance of additional shares of our capital stock and/or rights to acquire additional shares of our capital stock. We may also make acquisitions that result in issuances of additional shares of our capital stock. Those additional issuances of capital stock would result in a significant reduction of the percentage interest of existing or future investors. Furthermore, the book value per share of our common stock may be reduced. This reduction would occur if the exercise price of any issued warrants, the conversion price of any convertible notes or the conversion ratio of any issued preferred stock is lower than the book value per share of our common stock at the time of such exercise or conversion.

The additionthree-month period. Future sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock intoCommon Stock in the public market, or by the registration of any of our other securities under the Securities Actperception that such sales may significantly and negativelyoccur, could adversely affect the then prevailing market price for our common stock. The future sales of shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants and options may have a depressive effect on the market price of our common stock, as such warrantsCommon Stock and options would becould make it more difficult for us to raise funds in the future through an offering of our securities.

The price of our Common Stock is subject to volatility, including for reasons unrelated to our operating performance, which could lead to losses by investors and costly securities litigation.

The trading price of our Common Stock is likely to be exercised at a time when the price of our common stock is greater than the exercise price.


There may not be an active market for shares of our common stock.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQX which is maintained by the OTC Market Group Inc. under the symbol “ZEST”. However, no assurance can be given that an active trading market for our common stock will further develophighly volatile and continue. As a result, it may become more difficult to purchase, dispose of and obtain accurate quotations as to the value of our common stock. If we are unable to achieve a listing on a national securities exchange, our common stock would continue to trade on the OTCQX.

The market price of our common stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not improve.

Although we believe that a higher market price of our common stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, there can be no assurance that we will attract new investors, including institutional investors. In addition, there can be no assurance that the market price of our common stock will satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. As a result, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not necessarily improve.

Our stock could be subject to volatility.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, some of which are beyondmay be outside our control, including:including but not limited to, the following factors:

any announcements relating to our pending Walmart litigation;

 

 actual or anticipated fluctuationsvariations in our quarterly and annualoperating results;

Developments relating to the Walmart litigation;

 changes in market valuations of companies in ourthe oil and gas industry;

announcements of developments by us or our competitors;

future oil prices;


 announcements by us or our competitors of new strategies, significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic relationships,partnerships, joint ventures, capital commitments, significant contracts, or other material developments that may affect our prospects;

 shortfallsthe continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic and shutdowns in the Territory;

adoption of new accounting standards affecting our operating results from levels forecasted by management;industry;

 additions or departures of key personnel;

 sales of our capital stockCommon Stock or other securities in the future;open market; and

 liquidityother events or cash flow constraints; and,
fluctuations in stock market prices and volume,factors, many of which are particularly common for the securities of emerging technology companies, such as us.beyond our control.

 

We may not pay dividends on our commonThe stock market is subject to significant price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the foreseeable future.

We havemarket price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against such a company. Litigation initiated against us, whether or not paid any dividends on our common stock to date. We are unlikely to pay dividends at any time in the foreseeable future; rather, we are likely to retain earnings, if any, to fund our operations and to develop and expand our business.


Future sales and issuances of our capital stock or rights to purchase capital stock could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our stock price to decline.

We continue to issue additional securities to raise capital. Future sales and issuances of our capital stock or rights to purchase our capital stocksuccessful, could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders. We may sell common stock, convertible securitiescosts and other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner as we may determine from time to time. If we sell any such securities in subsequent transactions, our stockholders may be materially diluted. New investors in such subsequent transactions could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holdersdiversion of our common stock.management’s attention and Company resources, which could harm our business and financial condition.

 

Future changes in the fair value of outstanding warrants could result in income volatility.volatility of our reported results of operations.

ChangesBecause of the derivative liability caused by our outstanding warrants, the increase or decrease in our Common Stock price each quarter (measured from the first day to the last day) is either a non-cash expense or income. If the price rises as it did in the fairfiscal quarter ended March 31, 2021, we are required to report the expense, which increases our actual operating loss. Contrarily a price decrease in a given quarter will cause us to report income. This could cause our reporting results to fluctuate otherwise as the result of our performance, which would increase volatility in our stock price.

We have recently experienced fluctuations in the market price of our Common Stock and if it again becomes subject to the “penny stock” rules, brokers will not generally solicit the purchase of our Common Stock, which would adversely affect the liquidity and market price of our Common Stock.

We have recently experienced wide fluctuations in the price of our Common Stock. For example, our stock price decreased from approximately $12.00 per share in early April 2021 to approximately $3.25 in mid-May 2021, resulting in our Common Stock to be considered a “penny stock” under SEC rules. The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” as an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. Such exceptions include among others any equity security listed on a national securities exchange and any equity security issued by an issuer that has (i) net tangible assets of at least $2,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for three years, net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years, or (iii) average annual revenue of at least $6,000,000 for the last three years. Although the market price of our Common Stock on OTCQB was $6.25 per share as of June 28, 2021, there is no assurance that our stock price will rise or stay above $5.00 per share. The “penny stock” designation requires any broker-dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. These rules limit the ability of broker-dealers to solicit purchases of our Common Stock and therefore reduce its liquidity.

Moreover, as a result of apparent regulatory pressure from the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, a growing number of broker-dealers decline to permit investors, or otherwise make it difficult, to purchase and sell “penny stocks.” The “penny stock” designation may have a depressive effect upon our Common Stock price.

Because we can issue “blank check” preferred stock without stockholder approval, it could adversely impact the rights of holders of our Common Stock.

Under our Articles of Incorporation our Board of Directors may approve an issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock without seeking stockholder approval. Any additional shares of preferred stock that we issue in the future may rank ahead of our Common Stock in terms of dividend or liquidation rights and may have greater voting rights than our Common Stock. In addition, such preferred stock may contain provisions allowing those shares to be converted into shares of Common Stock, which could dilute the value of Common Stock to current stockholders and could adversely affect the warrant liabilities caused bymarket price of our Common Stock. In addition, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company. Although we have no present intention to issue any additional shares of authorized preferred stock, there can be no assurance that we will not do so in the future.


The approval of the application to list our Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market was significantly delayed due to factors outside our control; because our stock price volatilityis below the required minimum bid price of $4, our listing application may not be approved in the near future or other factors impacting the fair value determined by the Black Scholes model will impact other income or expense.at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our stock price and liquidity.

 

Last year we applied to list our Common Stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”). In December 2020 we effected a one-for-five reverse split of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock and conducted a registered offering of Common Stock and warrants, in each case to meet the Nasdaq quantitative initial listing requirements. Following the reverse split and the December 2020 capital raise we believe we continued to meet the Nasdaq initial listing standards until a decrease in our stock price mid-April 2021. As of the date of this Form 10-K our listing application remained pending.

At the time we effected the reverse stock split, we did not know that the approval of our listing application was being delayed by Nasdaq pending an inquiry by FINRA involving potential manipulation of our Common Stock. Since we never engaged in any investor relations activities, we always assumed any alleged manipulation did not involve Ecoark or its management. Nasdaq recently advised us that the FINRA inquiry will no longer prevent it from approving our listing application once we satisfy the $4 minimum bid price requirement.

Even if we meet the $4 bid price requirement, there is no assurance that our listing application will be approved in the near future or at all. We have no intention at this time to effect another reverse stock split. If our listing application is not approved, our Common Stock will continue to trade on the OTCQB, which would affect the liquidity and price of our Common Stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

Item 2. Properties

 

The Company does not own any real property. It currently leases office and production space in San Jose, California.Antonio, Texas. The current property lease is considered adequate for operations and does not extend beyond five years.this lease runs through November 2023. In addition a subsidiary leases space in Kilgore, Texas for a term of 42 months through September 30, 2022.

 

As of March 31, 2021, our acreage is comprised of approximately 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. We acquired certain oil and gas properties as part of the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020, and during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 continued to focus on expanding our exploration and production footprint and capabilities by acquiring real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases.


The Company had an analysis completed by an independent petroleum consulting company in March 2021 to complete the acquisition analysis within the required one-year period. The analysis required an asset allocation of the oil and gas reserves from the acquisitions noted above and also required the Company to impair certain reserves acquired.

Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

As of March 31, 2021 and 2020, all of our proved oil and natural gas reserves were located in the United States, in the States of Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana. The Company did not have any proved oil and natural gas reserves prior to the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

The following tables set forth summary information with respect to our proved reserves as of March 31, 2021 and 2020. For additional information see Supplemental Information “Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)” to our consolidated financial statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Proved reserves as of March 31, 2021 (Numbers in thousands, except per barrel):

Reserve Category Crude Oil (Mbbl)  Natural Gas (MMcf)  Total Proved (BOE)(1) 
Proved Reserves         
Developed  463       -   463 
Developed Non-Producing  -   -   - 
Undeveloped  -   -   - 
             
Total Proved Reserves  463   -   463 
             
Estimated Future Net Cash Flows(2)         $10,570 
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows          (3,347)
             
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows – (PV10)(3)         $7,223 

(1)BOE (barrels of oil equivalent) is calculated by a ratio of 6 MCF to 1 BBL of oil
(2)Prices used for net cash flow are based on the 12 month average of the wti cushing price reference. an average benchmark of $40.01/bbl and average realized price of $38.54/bbl were analyzed with the realized price ultimately used in the cash flow analysis.
(3)PV10 represents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved oil and natural gas reserves discounted at 10%. pv-10 of our total year-end proved reserves is considered a non-us gaap financial measure as defined by the sec. we believe that presentation of the pv-10 is relevant and useful to our investors because it presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved reserves. we further believe investors and creditors use our pv-10 as a basis for comparison of the relative size and value of our reserves to other companies.


Proved reserves as of March 31, 2020 (Numbers in thousands, except per barrel):

Reserve Category Crude Oil (Mbbl)  Natural Gas (MMcf)  Total Proved (BOE)(1) 
Proved Reserves         
Developed  17         -   17 
Developed Non-Producing  -   -   - 
Undeveloped  -   -   - 
             
Total Proved Reserves  17   -   17 
             
Estimated Future Net Cash Flows(2)         $(128)
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows          40 
             
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows – (PV10)(3)         $(88)

(1)BOE (barrels of oil equivalent) is calculated by a ratio of 6 MCF to 1 BBL of oil
(2)Prices used for net cash flow are based on the 12 month average of the wti cushing price reference. an average benchmark of $55.77/bbl and average realized price of $45.91/bbl were analyzed with the realized price ultimately used in the cash flow analysis.
(3)PV10 represents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved oil and natural gas reserves discounted at 10%. pv-10 of our total year-end proved reserves is considered a non-us gaap financial measure as defined by the sec. we believe that presentation of the pv-10 is relevant and useful to our investors because it presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved reserves. we further believe investors and creditors use our pv-10 as a basis for comparison of the relative size and value of our reserves to other companies.


The following table presents certain information with respect to oil and natural gas production attributable to our interests in all of our properties in the United States, the reserve derived from the sale of such production, average sales price received and average production costs for the year ended March 31, 2021 and during the 4 day period after the Banner Midstream acquisition between March 28, 2020 and the fiscal year-end on March 31, 2020. Numbers in thousands except average barrel or production sales and costs.

  Units of Measure March 31,
2021
 
Production     
Oil Barrels  463 
Natural Gas Mcf  - 
BOE    463 
       
Sales      
Oil Barrels $16,657 
Natural Gas Mcf $- 
       
Average Sales Price      
Oil Barrels $38.54 
Natural Gas Mcf $- 
       
Production – Lease Operating Expenses   $6,089 
       
Average Cost of Production per BOE   $13.15 

Units of MeasureMarch 31,
2020
Production
OilBarrels    -
Natural GasMcf-
BOE-
Sales
OilBarrels$-
Natural GasMcf$-
Average Sales Price
OilBarrels$-
Natural GasMcf$-
Production – Lease Operating Expenses$-
Average Cost of Production per BOE$-

Drilling and other exploratory activities:

During the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company undertook a drilling program and pre-funded approximately $5,800,000 of the cost, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387,000 has been expensed as drilling costs. For the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company acquired Banner Midstream and all activities and properties owned by them at the time of acquisition. Other than some minor drilling in that four-day period of time that the Company owned Banner Midstream, no material activities occurred.

Present activities:

The Company is assessing all of its properties at the present time to determine any future drilling activities to commence.

Delivery commitments:

The Company is not currently committed to provide a fixed and determinable quantity of oil and gas in the near future under existing contracts or agreements.


Productive Wells

The following table sets forth the number of wells in our inventory, in which we maintained an operated ownership interest as of March 31, 2021.

Well Category: Oil  Gas 
       
Active Producer  29   - 
Inactive Producer  63   11 
Shut-In  2   1 
Plugged & Abandoned  1   - 
Active Salt Water Disposal (SWD)  19   - 
Inactive SWD  2   - 
         
   116   12 

The following table sets forth the number of wells in our inventory, in which we maintained ownership interests as of March 31, 2020.

Well Category: Oil  Gas 
       
Active Producer  9   - 
Inactive Producer  41   - 
Shut-In  3   1 
Plugged & Abandoned  1   - 
Active Salt Water Disposal (SWD)  1   - 
Inactive SWD  -   - 
         
   55   1 


Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, we may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. We are presently involved in litigation including a suit filed by the Companyfollowing legal proceedings in Arkansas on August 1, 2018, and a complaint that named the Company in Florida. To the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of our properties or businesses are subject, which would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

On August 1, 2018, Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Zest Labs, Inc. filed a complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest a total of $115 million in damages which includes $65 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. liable on three claims. The federal jury found that Walmart Inc. misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. On April 27, 2021, we filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Central Division a motion for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $46,000,000 or alternatively, $13,536,803, pre-judgment interest in the amount of $16,700,548 and 0.06% post-judgment interest, accruing from April 13, 2021. 

On December 12, 2018, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in Sarasota County, Florida by certain investors who invested in the Company before it was public. The complaint alleges that the investment advisors who solicited the investors to invest into the Company made omissions and misrepresentations concerning the Company and the shares. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint which is pending. 

 

On August 1, 2018, Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Zest Labs, Inc. filed a complaint against Walmart Inc. inIn the United States District Court for the Eastern Districtopinion of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. Ecoark Holdings and Zest Labsmanagement, there are seeking monetary damages andno other related relief to the extent it is deemed proper by the court. The Company does not believelegal matters involving us that expenses incurred in pursuing the complaint willwould have a material adverse effect onupon the Company’s net income or financial condition, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019results of operations or any individual fiscal quarter. On October 22, 2018, the Court issued an order setting a trial date of June 1, 2020. The order also established deadlines for the completion of fact discovery by October 15, 2019, opening expert reports on October 24, 2019, and dispositive motions, on January 22, 2020. The case is presently in the fact discovery phase.

cash flows.

 

On December 12, 2018, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in Sarasota County, Florida by certain investors who invested in the Company before it was public. The complaint alleges that the investment advisors who solicited the investors to invest into the Company made omissions and misrepresentations concerning the Company and the shares. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint which is pending.

On June 20, 2018, a complaint against the Company and certain affiliates was filed by a former consultant in the U.S. District Court - Northern District of California. The complaint refers to an advisory agreement dated January 1, 2015 with Ecoark, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, in which the former consultant was to provide advice and consultation to Ecoark, Inc. in exchange for consulting fees, expenses and a warrant to purchase equity in Ecoark, Inc. The matter was settled in January 2019. The Company recorded a charge of $20 in connection with the settlement of the matter. 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.


PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock was traded on the over the counter market from February 6, 2010 until April 21, 2016,is quoted OTC Markets’ OTCQB tier under the symbol “MGLT”“ZEST”. From April 22, 2016, until December 11, 2016, our common stock traded on the OTCQBAny over-the-counter market under the symbol “EARK”. On December 12, 2016, our common stock moved to the OTCQX market where it continued to trade under the “EARK” symbol until November 29, 2017. On November 30, 2017, our ticker symbol changed to “ZEST”quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and our common stock continued to trade on the OTCQX market.may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

The following table sets forth the high and low prices for our common stock for the calendar quarters indicated (not our fiscal quarters), as reported by the OTCQB/QX. These prices have been retroactively adjusted for the reverse 1-for-250 stock split that occurred on March 18, 2016, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 4:C.38

 

2019 HIGH  LOW 
First Quarter $

.95

  $

.64

 
Second Quarter $.89  $.47 

Third Quarter (through August 16)

 $.86  $.49 
         
2018    
First Quarter $2.45  $1.25 
Second Quarter $

2.02

 $.88 
Third Quarter $

2.54

  $.94 
Fourth Quarter $1.33  $.64 

2017      
First Quarter $7.95  $3.70 
Second Quarter $5.50  $3.26 
Third Quarter $4.15  $2.65 
Fourth Quarter $3.10  $2.00 

2016      
First Quarter $18.00  $8.65 
Second Quarter $22.00  $12.00 
Third Quarter $21.00  $7.00 
Fourth Quarter $9.25  $4.48 

2015      
First Quarter $12.50  $3.75 
Second Quarter $17.53  $5.00 
Third Quarter $6.50  $3.75 
Fourth Quarter $15.00  $2.50 

 

Holders

 

As of August 16, 2019, the last reported sales price reported on the OTC Markets Inc. for our common stock was $.55 per share. As of the date of this filing, we had approximately 292169 holders of record of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is Philadelphia Stock Transfer, located at 2320 Haverford Road, Suite 230, Ardmore, Pennsylvania 19003.

 

Dividends

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. The payment of dividends on our common stock in the future will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, operating and financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors may consider appropriate.  

We currently expect to use all available funds to finance the future development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 20192021 other than those transactions previously reported to the SEC on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

  

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

 

None.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data [RESERVED]

 

Not required.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations describes the principal factors affecting the results of our operations, financial condition, and changes in financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited financial statements, and notes thereto, included elsewhere in this report. The information contained in this discussion is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. We urge you to review carefully the sections of this report entitled “Risk Factors

Sales and Forward-Looking Statements” for a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with an investment in our securities.Marketing

 

Dollar amountsThrough Banner Midstream and numbers of shares that follow in this report are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.

Impact of Restatement Adjustments on Other Income and Net Loss of Previously Reported Periods

As more fully described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report,its subsidiaries, the Company identified inadvertent errors in the accounting for certain embedded derivative liabilities associated with warrants issuedsells and provides services to its customers via a blanket master services agreement (MSA). Banner Midstream sells hydrocarbon to midstream providers such as a part of capital raises in 2017Plains Marketing L.P. and 2018. In connection with those capital raises, proceeds (net of fees) were accounted for as equity. Upon further evaluation, the Company determined that a portion of the capital raised should have been accounted for as liabilities with fair value changes recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Accordingly, the Company is restating its previously issued consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and interim periods in fiscal years 2018 and 2019 as well as an adjustment to the opening balance sheet for the first interim period of fiscal 2018 (the “Restated Periods”).Shell Trading (US) Company.

 

The only impactCompany markets its technology products and services principally through direct sales efforts and the utilization of third-party agents. Zest Labs has marketing operations and programs for demand generation, public relations, and branding/messaging that are scaled based on the consolidated statements of operations is an adjustment to other income which impacts the net loss for the respective Restated Periods. There is no impact to the income tax provision or net deferred tax asset because both the current tax benefitmarket engagement and deferred tax assets were offset by a full valuation allowance. Impacts to the consolidated balance sheets consisting of establishing derivative liabilities and adjustments to stockholders’ equity are addressed in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.available resources.

 

The adjustmentTrend Holdings and its subsidiaries provide fund administration and fund formation services to the opening balance sheet as of April 1, 2017 consisted of establishing a current derivatives liability of $3,351, offset by a reduction in additional paid-in-capital of $4,180institutional investors and a reduction of accumulated deficit of $829.

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, other income increased by $3,346 with a corresponding reduction in net loss from $13,609 to $10,263.

For the three and six months ended September 30, 2017, other income increased by $2,161 and $5,507, respectively, with corresponding reductions in net loss from $11,967 to $9,806 and from $25,576 to $20,069, respectively.

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2017, other income increased by $1,738 and $7,245, respectively, with corresponding reductions in net loss from $10,017 to $8,279 and from $35,593 to $28,348, respectively.

For the year ended March 31, 2018, other income increased by $9,316 with a corresponding reduction in net loss from $42,152 to $32,836.

For the three months ended June 30, 2018, other income increased by $321 with a corresponding reduction in net loss from $3,548 to $3,227.

For the three and six months ended September 30, 2018, other income increased by $715 and $1,036, respectively, with corresponding reductions in net loss from $4,065 to $3,350 and from $7,613 to $6,577, respectively.

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2018, other income increased by $1,587 and $2,623, respectively, with corresponding reductions in net loss from $4,270 to $2,683 and from $11,883 to $9,260, respectively.market their services through private marketing.


OVERVIEWGovernment Regulations

 

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.Banner Midstream

 

Ecoark HoldingsOil and gas production is an innovative AgTech company focused on solutions that reduce food waste and improve delivered freshness and product margins for fresh and perishable foods forregulated under a wide range of organizationsfederal and state statutes, rules, orders and regulations. State and federal statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. The states in which we operate, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico (the “Territory”), have regulations governing conservation matters, including growers, processors, distributorsprovisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and retailers. Ecoark Holdings addresses this through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary: Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs” or “Zest”). The Company committed to a plan to focus its business on Zest Labsgas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and divested non-core assets in 2019 that included assetsgas wells, the regulation of Pioneer Products, LLC (“Pioneer Products” or “Pioneer”)spacing, and Magnolia Solar, Inc. (“Magnolia Solar”). Those assets are reported as heldrequirements for saleplugging and their operations are reported as discontinued operationsabandonment of wells. Also, states in the consolidated financial statements. The subsidiary Eco3d, LLC (“Eco3d”) was soldTerritory impose a severance tax on April 14, 2017production and is also reported as held for salesales of oil, and discontinued operationsgas within its jurisdiction. Failure to comply with these rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. Our competitors in the consolidated financial statements. The Company has 20 employees of continuing operations as ofoil and gas industry are subject to the date of this filing.

On September 26, 2017, the Company announcedsame regulatory requirements and restrictions that its Board of Directors unanimously approved a new corporate strategy. The Company has transitioned from a diversified holding company into a company focused on its Zest Labs asset. The Company has divested all non-core holdings. In May 2018, the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell key assets of Pioneer (including the assets of Sable) and Magnolia Solar. The sales were completed in 2019. Relevant assets and liabilities are classified as held for sale and operations are classified as discontinued in the consolidated financial statements. The Company will be focusing on three separate areas: the primary focus will continue to be the commercialization of the Zest Fresh solution across the country and abroad. The next area will be on licensing, partnerships, or joint ventures to apply a branding of the Zest Fresh certification to various perishable consumer goods and products. The final area will be to identify any bolt-on technologies or operations that can be acquired to open up new sales and distribution channels for the Zest solution.

On May 31, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) for the Company to acquire 100% of Trend Holdings pursuant to a merger of Trend Holdings with and into the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed on the May 31, 2019 and as agreed in the Merger Agreement, the Company is the surviving entity in the Merger and the separate corporate existence of Trend Holdings has ceased to exist.

Trend Holding's primary asset is Trend Discovery Capital Management.  Trend Discovery Capital Management manages several entities including Trend Discovery LP and Trend Discovery SPV I.  Trend Discovery LP is a hybrid hedge fund with a since inception track record of outperforming the S&P 500. Trend Discovery LP primarily invests in early-stage startups.  In the near-term, Trend Discovery LP's performance will be driven by its investment in Volans-i, a fully autonomous vertical takeoff and landing ("VTOL") drone delivery platform.  Trend Discovery LP currently owns approximately 1% of Volans-i, and has participation rights to future financings to maintain its ownership at 1% indefinitely. More information can be found at flyvoly.com.

Description of Businessaffect our operations.

 

Zest Labs

 

Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs offers freshness management solutionsseeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates.  The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”), is responsible for fresh food growers, suppliers, processors, distributors, grocersthe assignment of spectrum for non-government use in the United States in accordance with regulations established by an international organization known as the International Telecommunications Union (the “ITU”). Any ITU or FCC reallocation of radio frequency spectrum, including frequency band segmentation or sharing of spectrum, could cause interference with the reception of GPS signals and restaurants. Itsmay materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of Zest Fresh solution isLabs’ products, which would, in turn, cause a cloud-based post-harvest shelf-life and freshness management solution that improves delivered freshness of produce and protein and reduces post-harvest losses at the retailer due to temperature handling and processing by 50% or more by intelligently matching customer freshness requirements with actual product freshness. It focusesmaterial adverse effect on four primary value propositions – operational efficiency, consistent food freshness, reduced waste, and improved food safety. Zest Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence at a pallet level. Zest Labs also offers its Zest Delivery solution that provides real-time monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food.our operating results.

 

Environmental Compliance Expenses

We are currently not experiencing any material expenses related to the environmental compliance. Please review Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report with regard to potential environmental compliance expenses.

Environmental, Social and Governance Strategy (ESG)

We are currently evaluating an environmentally conscious cryptocurrency mining approach to focus on and analyze innovative and valuable ways to deploy capital. We are focused on opportunities related to ESG technologies for hydrocarbon emissions and reductions in energy waste. We have formulated an approach to pursue regionally constrained energy that is otherwise lost due to a lack of commercial infrastructure to economically process and/or transport the natural gas to market. This approach is designed to drive significant molecule value through the energy intensive process of cryptocurrency mining. This strategy is anticipated to incubate green energy project development and growth by balancing regional power grid demands during times of heightened use.

Research and Development

We have devoted a substantial amount of our resources to software and hardware development activities in recent years, principally for the Zest Labs was previously known as Intelleflex Corporation. Effective on October 28, 2016, Intelleflex Corporation changedinitiatives. Ecoark Holdings believes that, analyzing the competitive factors affecting the market for the solutions and services its name to Zest Labs, Inc. to align its corporate name with its mission and the brand name ofsubsidiaries provide, its products and services.

services compete favorably by offering integrated solutions to customers. The Company has incurred research and development expenses of $883,000 and $2,472,000 in the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, to develop its solutions and differentiate those solutions from competitive offerings. We incurred no capitalized software development costs in the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020.


The Zest Fresh value proposition is to reduce fresh food loss by improving quality consistency. In the U.S. produce market, it is reported that roughly 30% of post-harvest fresh food is lost or wasted and therefore not consumed. Both fresh food producers and retailers bear significant expense when harvested food is either rejected due to early spoilage or reduced in value due to early ripening. Zest Labs believes that a significant portion of this waste can be attributed to inconsistent quality or freshness based on variable post-harvest processing and handling. Fresh food producers and retailers manage food distribution and inventory based on the harvest date, with the assumption that all food harvested on the same day will have the same freshness. However, studies have shown that harvest conditions and post-harvest handling can have a significant effect on the actual remaining freshness and, if not properly accounted for, can result in food loss or spoilage ahead of expectations. Zest Fresh empowers fresh food producers and retailers to significantly reduce the post-harvest loss by providing real-time guidance to process adherence, intelligent distribution and best handling practices, with a goal of providing significant financial savings to fresh food producers and retailers. Intellectual Property

 

Zest Labs has developed the industry’s first freshness metric called the Zest Intelligent Pallet Routing Code (“ZIPR Code”). The ZIPR Code has three main components: Harvest Quality which sets total freshness capacity (for example, 12 days for strawberries), Handling Impact which reflects aging acceleration due to improper handling, and Future Handling which accurately reflects how the product will be handled (for example, store shelf temperature may be 40 degrees Fahrenheit instead of the ideal 34 degrees Fahrenheit). 

Zest Fresh is offered to fresh food producers, processors, distributors, restaurants and grocers with pricing based on the number of pallets managed by Zest Fresh, typically from the field harvestCompany, through retail grocery delivery. The Zest Fresh service includes a re-usable wireless Internet of Things (“IoT”) condition sensor that travels with the pallet of fresh food from the field or processor through retail delivery, continuously collecting product condition data. The collected pallet product data is analyzed, using artificial intelligence-based predictive analytics in real time by the Zest Fresh cloud-based solution, with the fresh food producers and retailers accessing data through Zest Fresh web and mobile applications. Zest Fresh provides workers with real-time feedback on the current handling or processing of each pallet, empowering best practice adherence to achieve maximum freshness. Zest Fresh also provides dynamic updates as to actual product freshness for each pallet, enabling intelligent routing and inventory management of each pallet in a manner that ensures optimum delivered freshness. Zest Fresh also includes integrated blockchain support to grower and shipper customers via the Zest Fresh platform. 

Zest Labs’ Zest Delivery solution helps to manage prepared food delivery from the restaurant through to the customer. Zest Delivery manages the delivery container environment, both monitoring and controlling the product condition. The value of Zest Delivery is to manage prepared meals in an ideal state for consumption, while accommodating extended pre-staging or delivery times. Extended pre-staging times are associated with “instant delivery” services of prepared meals, where the meals are often pre-staged in a delivery area ahead of demand. While pre-staging enables fast demand response time, it can result in prepared meals being staged for extended periods, which can potentially impact quality, value and safety. Zest Delivery monitors and controls the delivery container environment to preserve the prepared meal in ideal, ready to consume condition. Zest Delivery also provides the dispatcher with real-time remote visibility to the condition of available meals and confirming quality prior to dispatch. Zest Delivery provides automated, real-time visibility for a very distributed fleet of drivers, reflecting prepared meal food safety, quality and availability. Zest Delivery is offered to meal delivery companies based on the quantity of delivery containers and frequency of use.

Zest Labs, currently holds rights to 6775 U.S. patents (with additional patents pending), numerous related foreign patents, and U.S. copyrights relating to certain aspects of its Zest software, hardware devices including Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”) technology, software, and services. In addition, Zest Labs has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services,” and the Zest, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery logos, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Many of Zest Labs’ products have been designed to include licensed intellectual property obtained from third-parties. Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates.

No Foreign Operations

No foreign operations are expected in connection with the Company’s business. 

Seasonality

Our business experiences a certain level of seasonality due to our oil and gas exploration and transportation business. Demand for oil, natural gas and energy is typically higher in the third and fourth quarters resulting in higher prices. Due to these seasonal fluctuations, results of operations for individual quarterly periods may not be indicative of the results that may be realized on an annual basis. Seasonal weather conditions and lease stipulations can limit drilling and producing activities and other oil and natural gas operations in a portion of our operating areas of trucking business. These seasonal anomalies can pose challenges for the drilling objectives and can increase competition for equipment, supplies and personnel during the spring and summer months, which could lead to shortages and increase costs or delay operations, thus, lowering the demand for trucking services.

Dependence on One or Few Major Customers

From time to time we may have customers generating 10 percent or more of the Company’s consolidated revenues, and loss of such customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Human Capital Resources

As of the date of this report, we have 45 full-time employees and 106 owner-operator truck drivers.

Our ability to successfully execute our strategic initiatives is highly dependent on recruiting and retaining skilled personnel and qualified drivers. Our compensation philosophy is based on incentivizing and rewarding performance, with alignment of individual, corporate, and stockholder interests. Compensation includes salaries, benefits, and equity participation. Our owner operator drivers are not salaried employees.

We are committed to the health, safety, and well-being of our employees and drivers. We follow applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and guidance. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented measures to enable employees to work remotely and have utilized cloud-based productivity and communications systems to facilitate distributed work.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to ensure that all employees maintain the highest standards of business conduct in every aspect of their dealings with each other, customers, suppliers, vendors, service providers, stockholders, and governmental authorities.

We believe the relations with our employees and drivers are satisfactory.

10

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K before deciding to invest in our Common Stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects, as well as our ability to accomplish our strategic objectives. As a result, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations and stock price.

Summary Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that you should consider before investing in our common stock. Set forth below is a summary of the principal risks we face:

we have incurred significant losses since inception, we may continue to incur losses and negative cash flows in the future;

because we require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, our inability to generate and obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects;

significant ongoing capital requirements related to our exploration and production and transportation business;

the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. and global economy, and the uncertainty relating to its continuation and the pace of economic recovery;

the uncertainty of future results due to limited operating history;

we may be required to recognize goodwill impairment charges, which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results;

we may be required to record significant non-cash impairment charges related to a reduction in the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties;

the uncertainty of future results due to limited operating history;

our future cash flows and results of operations, are highly dependent on our ability to efficiently develop our current oil reserves and economically find or acquire additional recoverable reserves;

the dependence of our future operating results on oil and gas prices that are highly volatile;

future changes in the climate change regulatory regime and continued focus on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) regulation and sustainability initiatives, which would have the effect of reducing demand for fossil fuels and negatively impact our operating results, stock price and ability to access capital markets;

potential future changes in the regulation of hydraulic fracturing;

potential inability to retain and attract qualified drivers, including owner-operators;

potential risk that the drivers who we rely upon in our transportation business will be classified as employees rather than independent contractors; and

the uncertainty related to the outcome of the pending Walmart litigation related to the protection of our intellectual property rights.


Risk Factors Relating to Our Financial Condition

We had incurred net losses on an annual basis since our inception and may continue to experience losses and negative cash flow in the future.

As of June 22, 2021, we had cash (including restricted cash) of approximately $1,194,235. Prior to the acquisition of Banner Midstream, we funded our operations principally through the sale of our capital stock and debt instruments. On December 31, 2020, we raised approximately $7,666,000 in net proceeds from the sale of 889,000 shares of common stock and short-term warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 889,000 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering. We have also raised substantial operating cash through the exercise of our warrants issued in capital raises over the past two years. Banner Midstream had financed its operations primarily through the issuance of debt securities. We have not been profitable on an annual basis since inception and had previously incurred significant operating losses. We recorded a net loss of approximately $20,888,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. Approximately 42% of the reported net loss for this fiscal year was due to non-cash charges, including a $18,518,000 non-cash charge from a change in the fair value of our warrant derivative liabilities and $21,084,000 in gain on exchange of warrants. While our warrant derivative liabilities cause us to incur a non-cash loss if our stock price goes up in a given quarter or a non-cash gain if it goes down in a quarter, we have experienced substantial exercises since the date of our July 28, 2020 prospectus registering the underlying shares of Common Stock. As of March 31, 2021, no warrants remained unexercised out of approximately 1,176,000 warrants (on a post-reverse split basis) we issued in 2020. However, we have an additional approximately 1,035,000 warrants (on a post-reverse split basis) which have derivative liabilities that will impact our future operating results. Although we expect our revenues to increase from our energy business, we will likely continue to incur losses and experience negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future. If we cannot achieve positive cash flow from operations or net income, it may make it more difficult to raise capital based on our Common Stock on acceptable terms.

Because we require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, our inability to generate and obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

Since the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020, we have increased our operating expenses in supporting our underlying business and consummating acquisitions of oil and gas properties. We intend to continue to make substantial investments to fund our business and support our growth. Among other things, we need to raise capital through the issuance of equity or debt in order to fund the drilling of oil wells for our previously announced joint venture with a Texas exploration company. Since we do not currently have a debt facility to support our growth and acquisition strategy, we are seeking to fund our growth through equity offerings at opportune times when the price of our Common Stock and external factors provide an opportunity. The availability and terms of any future financing will be dependent upon a variety of other factors which may affect the price of our Common Stock including among other things:

The pace of economic recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic;

The condition of the capital markets in general and those for smaller capitalization issuers in particular;

The effect of the potential new legislation, regulation or government action which directly affect our business such as environmental, social and governance (“ESG”), climate change, oil and gas drilling, fracking, growing market for electric vehicles and efforts to ban fossil fuels, and legislation such as California’s AB5 which causes us to treat our owner-operators in our trucking business as employees, which will tend to increase our expenses;

The impact of ESG measures, potential new rules and recent stockholder votes of large energy producers on the investment community and disclosure practices;

The possibility that certain investors concerned about potential effects of climate change would limit or eliminate their investments in oil and gas companies and the growth of the alternative-energy markets with so-called “green” funds trading at record highs;

Potential regulation or government action requiring financial institutions to adopt policies that limit funding of fossil fuels companies; and

International factors including political unrest which may reduce the prices of oil and gas.

We may not be able to obtain such additional financing on the terms favorable to us, or at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may be adversely impacted. In addition, our inability to generate or obtain the financial resources needed may require us to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our operations and sell some of our assets. For example, in May 2021, we assigned certain of our working interests in oil and gas leases in exchange for $600,000 in order to obtain the necessary working capital. If we were forced to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our operations or sell a significant portion of our assets it would have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Further, if we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity or debt securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our Common Stock. Any debt financing that we may secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused and may continue to cause a significant disruption to the United States and global economy, and its continuation for any extended period of time may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and future prospects.

The global COVID-19 pandemic and the unprecedented actions taken by U.S. federal, state and local governments and governments around the world in order to stop the spread of the virus have had and continue to have a profound impact on the U.S. and global economy, disrupting global supply chains and creating significant volatility in the financial markets. The contraction of the economy caused by the pandemic has, among other things, severely impacted demand for fossil fuels resulting in sharp decline in oil and gas prices. Oil demand significantly deteriorated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding preventative measures taken around the world to mitigate its spread, including “shelter-in-place” orders, quarantines, executive orders and similar government orders and restrictions for their residents to control the spread of COVID-19.

Although oil prices have increased in the past few months due to, among other things, the Biden administration anti-fossil fuel agenda, the vaccine rollouts and the decision by OPEC to restrain output into mid-2021, there can be no assurance that this increase will continue.

Future disruptions and/or uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, among others, delays in vaccine rollouts and the emergence of new variants of the virus, for a sustained period of time could have a material adverse impact on our business, our ability to execute our strategy and to realize the full benefits of the Banner Midstream acquisition. Our production and transportation businesses will likely be significantly affected if there is another reduction in oil prices or reduced demand for our services, caused by a global recession due to the ongoing effects of COVID-19. 

Furthermore, the effect of the pandemic on financial markets and on our Company may limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future on the terms acceptable to us at the time we need it, or at all.


We will need additional capital to support our operations and growth.

Until we achieve sustained profitability, we will need to raise additional capital through public or private financing transactions or secure a debt facility to support our operations and execute our growth strategy. We may not be able to obtain additional financing in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. We could also be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or otherwise at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable, and we may be required to relinquish rights to some of our current master service agreements or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects. Even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations.

If we are able to close an equity financing, it may be very dilutive to our existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will complete any financing or secure a debt facility. If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired and may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue one or more of the lines of operations and/or sell more assets, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We cannot predict our future results because we have a limited operating history.

We acquired our oil and gas business on March 27, 2020, which currently accounts for almost all of our revenues. Given our limited operating history, it may be difficult to evaluate our future performance or prospects. You should consider the uncertainties that we may encounter as a company that should still be considered an early stage company. These uncertainties include:

our ability to market our services and products for a profit;

our ability to secure and retain key customers; and

our evolving business model.

If we are not able to address successfully some or all of these uncertainties, we may not be able to expand our business, compete effectively or achieve profitability.

Because we must periodically evaluate our goodwill for impairment, we could be required to recognize non-cash impairment charges in future periods which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

A considerable portion of our consolidated assets consists of goodwill. The Company recorded approximately $3.2 million of goodwill in connection with the Trend Holdings acquisition in May 2019, and approximately $7.0 million in connection with the Banner Midstream acquisition in March 2020. We assess goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth fiscal quarter and whenever facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the Company’s goodwill may be impaired. Impairment analysis involves comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, we record an impairment charge. Determination of fair value requires considerable judgment and is sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions, estimates and market factors. Those assessments may be affected by (i) positive or negative reserve adjustments, (ii) results of drilling activities, (iii) management’s outlook for commodity prices and costs and expenses, (iv) changes in our market capitalization, (v) changes in our weighted average cost of capital and (vi) changes in income taxes. If we are required to recognize noncash charges related to impairment of goodwill, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected. 

14

Risk Factors Relating to Our Exploration and Production and Transportation Operations

We have significant ongoing capital requirements that could affect our profitability if we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms.

The Company has pre-funded approximately $5,800,000 of the cost, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387,000 has been expensed as drilling costs, and we expect to continue to incur expenses related to our previously announced joint drilling venture. In addition, our transportation business is capital intensive and asset heavy, and our policy of maintaining a young, technology-equipped fleet requires us to expend significant amounts in capital expenditures annually. We expect to pay for projected capital expenditures with cash flows from operations or the proceeds from equity sales. If we were unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, we would need to seek alternative sources of capital, including financing, to meet our capital requirements. In the event that we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms in the future, we may have to limit our fleet size, enter into less favorable financing arrangements or operate our revenue equipment for longer periods, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our profitability.

Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is intense, making it more difficult for us to market the oil and gas we produce, to acquire interests in new leases, to secure trained personnel and appropriate services, and to raise capital.

Banner Midstream is a relatively small participant in its industry and we face significant competition from major energy companies with substantial financial, management, technical and other resources as well as large and other privately held businesses which have competitive advantages. Our cost of operations is highly dependent on third-party services, and competition for these services can be significant, especially in times when commodity prices are rising.  Similarly, we compete for trained, qualified personnel, and in times of lower prices for the commodities we produce, we and other companies with similar production profiles may not be able to attract and retain this talent.  Our ability to acquire and develop reserves in the future will depend on our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment for acquiring properties, marketing oil and gas and securing trained personnel.  Also, there is substantial competition for capital available for investment in the oil and gas industry.  Our competitors may be able to pay more for personnel, property and services and to attract capital at lower rates.  This may become more likely if prices for natural gas increase faster than prices for oil, as oil comprises a greater percentage of our overall production and transportation business. Because of our small size, we may be more affected than larger competitors.

Unless we replace our existing reserves with new ones and develop those reserves, our reserves and production will decline, which would adversely affect our future cash flows and results of operations.

Producing oil reservoirs generally are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. Unless we conduct successful ongoing exploration and development activities or continually acquire properties containing proved reserves, our proved reserves will decline as those reserves are produced. Our future reserves and production, and therefore our future cash flow and results of operations, are highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing our current reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable reserves. We may not be able to develop, find or acquire sufficient additional reserves to replace our current and future production. If we are unable to replace our current and future production, the value of our reserves will decrease, and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.


Drilling for and producing crude oil involves significant risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our drilling and production activities are subject to many risks, including the risk that we will not discover commercially productive reservoirs. Drilling for crude oil can be unprofitable, not only from dry holes, but from productive wells that do not produce sufficient revenues to return a profit. In addition, our drilling and producing operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of other factors, including but not limited to:

unusual or unexpected geological formations and miscalculations;
fires;
explosions and blowouts;
pipe or cement failures;
environmental hazards, such as natural gas leaks, oil spills, pipeline and tank ruptures, encountering naturally occurring radioactive materials, and unauthorized discharges of toxic gases, brine, well stimulation and completion fluids, or other pollutants into the surface and subsurface environment;
loss of drilling fluid circulation;
title problems for the properties on which we drill and resulting restrictions or termination of lease for oil drilling and production operations;
facility or equipment malfunctions;
unexpected operational events, especially the need to drill significantly deeper than originally contemplated or finding, despite an engineering study to the contrary, that the drilling site is a dry hole that produces no appreciable amounts of crude oil or no crude oil;
shortages of skilled personnel or unexpected loss of key drilling and production workers;
shortages or delivery delays of equipment and services or of water used in hydraulic fracturing activities;
compliance with environmental and other regulatory requirements and any unexpected remedial requirements for violations of environmental or other regulatory requirements;
stockholder  activism and activities by non-governmental organizations to restrict the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas so as to minimize emissions of greenhouse gases of “GHG’s”;
natural disasters; and
adverse weather conditions.

Any of these risks can cause substantial losses, including personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution, environmental contamination, clean-up responsibilities, loss of wells, repairs to resume operations; and regulatory fines or penalties. Further, our exposure to operational risks may increase as our drilling activity expands.

We may not be insured or fully insured against certain of the above operational risks, either due to unavailability of such insurance or the high premiums and deductibles. The occurrence of an event that is not covered in full or in part by insurance could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Legislation, regulations or government actions related to climate change, greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability initiatives and other ESG laws, regulations and government action, could result in increased compliance and operating costs and reduced demand for fossil fuels, and concern in financial and investment markets over greenhouse gasses and fossil fuel production could adversely affect demand for our products, limit our access to capital and depress the price of our Common Stock.

Since he took office in January 2021, President Biden has signed a series of executive orders seeking to adopt new regulations to address climate change and to suspend, revise, or rescind certain prior agency actions which were part of the Trump Administration’s de-regulatory push, and the Biden Administration is expected to continue to aggressively seek to regulate the energy industry and seek to eliminate in time the use of fossil fuels. The new executive orders include, among other things, orders requiring a review of current federal lands leasing and permitting practices, as well as a temporary halt of new leasing of federal lands and offshore waters available for oil and gas exploration, directing federal agencies to eliminate subsidies for fossil fuels, and to develop a plan to improve climate-related disclosures.

In January 2021, President Biden also issued an executive order calling for methane emissions regulations to be reviewed and for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) to establish new standards by September 2021. The EPA has adopted regulations under existing provisions of the Clean Air Act that, among other things, establish Prevention of Significant Deterioration (the “PSD”), construction and Title V operating permit reviews for certain large stationary sources.  Facilities required to obtain PSD permits for their greenhouse gas emissions also will be required to meet “best available control technology” standards that will be established on a case-by-case basis.  The EPA also has adopted rules requiring the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from specified onshore and offshore natural gas and oil production sources in the United States on an annual basis, which include certain of our operations.

Although Congress from time to time has considered legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, there has not been significant activity in the form of adopted legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the federal level in recent years.  In the absence of such federal climate legislation, a number of states, including states in which we operate, have enacted or passed measures to track and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily through the planned development of greenhouse gas emission inventories and regional greenhouse gas cap-and-trade programs.  Most of these cap-and-trade programs require major sources of emissions or major producers of fuels to acquire and surrender emission allowances, with the number of allowances available for purchase reduced each year until the overall greenhouse gas emission reduction goal is achieved.  These reductions may cause the cost of allowances to escalate significantly over time. We will be further subject to our regulatory efforts such as California announced goal of eliminating the sale of vehicles which use gas by 2035. Automobile manufacturers are beginning to announce that they will only manufacture electric vehicles in the future.

Additionally, the United States rejoined, effective February 19, 2021, the non-binding international treaty to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions (the “Paris Agreement”), adopted by over 190 countries in December 2015.  The Paris Agreement entered into force in November 2016 after more than 70 nations, including the United States, ratified or otherwise indicated their intent to be bound by the agreement. The United States had previously withdrawn from the Paris Agreement effective November 4, 2020. Following the United States rejoining the Paris Agreement, President Biden announced in April 2021 the United States’ pledge to achieve an approximately 50% reduction from 2005 levels in “economy-wide” net greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. To the extent that the United States implements this agreement or imposes other climate change regulations on the oil and natural gas industry, or that investors insist on compliance regardless of legal requirements, it could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and future growth. In February 2021, the Acting Chair of the SEC issued a statement directing the Division of Corporation Finance to enhance its focus on climate-related disclosure in public company filings and in March 2021 the SEC announced the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force in the Division of Enforcement.


The adoption and implementation of these and other similar regulations could require us to incur material costs to monitor and report on greenhouse gas emissions or install new equipment to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases associated with our operations.  In addition, these regulatory initiatives could drive down demand for our products and services in the oil and gas industry by stimulating demand for alternative forms of energy that do not rely on combustion of fossil fuels that serve as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated financial condition.

Federal, state, and local legislative and regulatory initiatives in the United States relating to hydraulic fracturing or fracking could result in decreased demand for our transportation services, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Although we do not rely on hydraulic fracturing or fracking techniques in our exploration and production operations, our transportation business, which accounted for approximately 79% of our operating revenue in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, depends to a considerable extent on a continued use of such techniques. We expect to continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from our transportation operations for the foreseeable future.

In the United States, hydraulic fracturing is currently generally exempt from regulation under the Underground Injection Control program established under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, and is typically regulated by state oil and gas commissions or similar agencies. From time to time, the U.S. Congress has considered adopting legislation intended to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the additives used in the hydraulic-fracturing process. In addition, certain states have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations that could impose new or more stringent permitting, disclosure, disposal and well-construction requirements on hydraulic-fracturing operations. The adoption of any federal, state or local laws or the implementation of regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing could cause a decrease in the completion of new oil and gas wells and an associated decrease in demand for our transportation services, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our operating results fluctuate due to the effect of seasonality in the oil and gas industry.

Operating levels of the oil industry have historically been lower in the winter months because of adverse weather conditions. Accordingly, our revenue generally follows a seasonal pattern. Revenue can also be affected by other adverse weather conditions, holidays and the number of business days during a given period because revenue is directly related to the available working days. From time to time, we may also suffer short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, earthquakes, and explosions that could harm our results of operations or make our results of operations more volatile.

We may be subject to various claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, and increases in the amount or severity of these claims and lawsuits could adversely affect us.

We are exposed to various claims and litigation related to commercial disputes, personal injury, property damage, environmental liability and other matters. Proceedings include claims by third parties, and certain proceedings have been certified or purport to be class actions. Developments in regulatory, legislative or judicial standards, material changes to litigation trends, or a catastrophic accident or series of accidents, involving any or all of property damage, personal injury, and environmental liability could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.

The extension of our active oil and gas mineral leases may be subject to performing continuous drilling operations.

Our oil and gas mineral leases may contain acreage that is either held by production or not. In order to extend the leased acreage not held by production, the Company must maintain minimum continuous drilling operations in order to extend these leases to future periods. The Company’s inability to perform operations during any given period could result in the Company’s losing the rights to future operations on that lease.


The potential lack of availability of, or cost of, drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and crude oil field services could adversely affect our ability to execute on a timely basis our exploration and development plans within our budget.

When the prices of crude oil increase, or the demand for equipment and services is greater than the supply in certain areas, we could encounter an increase in the cost of securing drilling rigs, equipment and supplies. In addition, larger producers may be more likely to secure access to such equipment by offering more lucrative terms. If we are unable to acquire access to such resources, or can obtain access only at higher prices, our ability to convert our reserves into cash flow could be delayed and the cost of producing those reserves could increase significantly, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our exploration and production and transportation operations are subject to stringent environmental, oil and gas-related and occupational safety and health laws and regulations, and noncompliance with such laws and regulations could expose us to material costs and liabilities.

Our exploration and production operations are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the drilling activities, production rates, the size and shape of drilling and spacing units or proration units, the transportation and sale of crude oil, gas, and the discharging of materials into the environment and environmental protection. These laws and regulations may limit the amount of oil and gas we can produce or limit the number of wells or the locations where we can drill.

Further, we are required to obtain and maintain numerous environmental and oil and gas-related permits, approvals and certificates from various federal, state and local governmental agencies in connection with our exploration and production operations, and may incur substantial costs in doing so. The need to obtain permits could potentially delay, curtail or cease the development of oil and gas projects. The Company may in the future be charged royalties on gas emissions or required to incur certain capital expenditures for air pollution control equipment or other air emissions-related issues. Additionally, our operations are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal occupational safety and health and comparable state statutes, aimed at protecting the health and safety of employees.

We are also subject to various environmental laws and regulations dealing with the hauling and handling of hazardous materials, air emissions from our vehicles and facilities, and engine idling and discharge. Our transportation operations often involve traveling on unpaved roads located in rural areas, increasing the risk of accidents, and our staging pads often are located in areas where groundwater or other forms of environmental contamination could occur. Our operations involve the risks of environmental damage and hazardous waste disposal, among others. If we are involved in an accident involving hazardous substances, if there are releases of hazardous substances we transport, if soil or groundwater contamination is found at our facilities or results from our operations, or if we are found to be in violation of applicable environmental laws or regulations, we could owe cleanup costs and incur related liabilities, including substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may subject the Company to sanctions, including administrative, civil or criminal penalties, remedial cleanups or corrective actions, delays in permitting or performance of projects, natural resource damages and other liabilities. In addition, these laws and regulations may be amended and additional laws and regulations may be adopted in the future with more stringent legal requirements.

Because oil prices are highly volatile, any sustained decline in oil prices could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our capital expenditure obligations and financial commitments.

Our future revenues from exploration and production operations, profitability, cash flows, future growth and carrying value of our oil and gas properties will depend on oil prices. Commodity prices, including oil, are highly volatile and may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand and market uncertainty. Additional factors which may affect oil prices and which are beyond our control include but are not limited to, the following factors:

worldwide and regional economic conditions impacting the global supply of and demand for oil, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;


the price and quantity of foreign imports of oil;

consumer and business demand;

political and economic conditions in or affecting other producing regions or countries, including the Middle East, Africa, South America and Russia;

actions of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, its members and other state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and production controls;

the level of global exploration, development and production;

the level of global inventories;

prevailing prices on local price indexes in the area in which we operate;

the proximity, capacity, cost and availability of gathering and transportation facilities;

localized and global supply and demand fundamentals and transportation availability;

the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and transporting reserves;

weather conditions and other natural disasters;

technological advances affecting energy consumption;

the price and availability of alternative fuels;

government regulations, such as regulation of natural gas transportation and price controls;

U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. governmental regulation and taxes; and

market perceptions of future prices, whether due to the foregoing factors or others.

While lower oil prices are helpful to our transportation business since it reduces our costs, it has an inverse effect on our exploration and production business. Lower commodity prices may reduce our cash flows and borrowing ability. If we are unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms, our ability to develop future reserves could be adversely affected. Also, using lower prices in estimating proved reserves may result in a reduction in proved reserve volumes due to economic limits.

If we are required to curtail our drilling program, we may be unable to continue to hold leases that are scheduled to expire, which may further reduce our reserves. As a result, a substantial or extended decline in commodity prices may materially and adversely affect our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to finance planned capital expenditures.

Conservation measures and technological advances could reduce demand for oil and natural gas.

Fuel conservation measures, alternative requirements, future legislation and regulation increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil, and natural gas, technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices could reduce demand for oil. The impact of the changing demand for oil may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


We may be required to record significant non-cash impairment charges related to a reduction in the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

We will perform assessments of our oil and gas properties whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. In order to perform these assessments, management will use various observable and unobservable inputs, including management’s outlooks for (i) proved reserves and risk-adjusted probable and possible reserves, (ii) commodity prices, (iii) production costs, (iv) capital expenditures and (v) production. Significant or extended price declines could result in the need to adjust the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties by recording non-cash impairment charges. To the extent such assessments indicate a reduction of the estimated useful life or estimated future cash flows, the carrying value of the oil and gas properties may not be recoverable and therefore we may be required to record an impairment charge reducing the carrying value of the proved properties to their fair value. If oil and natural gas prices decline in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges related to the oil and gas properties acquired as part of the Banner Acquisition, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations in the period incurred.

Our future revenue will depend upon the size of the markets which we target and our ability to achieve continuous and sufficient market acceptance.

Even if we enter all necessary agreements with key customers in the oil industry and purchase enough equipment to satisfy the demand for freight services in the market, our future revenue will depend upon the size of the markets which we target and our ability to achieve continuous and sufficient market acceptance, and such factors as pricing, reimbursement from third-party payors and adequate market share for our services at the target markets.

We anticipate that the Banner Midstream expenses will increase substantially if and as they:

continue the research of the market and potential private companies to acquire;
expand the scope of our operations in the Territory;
establish a supply-demand chain and a respective trucking infrastructure to commercialize our market opportunities;
acquire existing businesses and revitalize their operations with the Companies framework;
seek to maintain, protect, and expand the Territory;
seek to attract and retain skilled personnel; and
create additional infrastructure to support our operations as a public company and plan future commercialization efforts.

We may not be able to successfully identify acquisition targets and complete strategic acquisitions to execute our growth strategy, and even if we are able to do so, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions.

As part of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue opportunities to acquire companies or assets that will enable us to expand our product and service offerings and to increase our geographic footprint. We routinely review potential acquisitions. However, identifying suitable acquisition targets can be difficult, costly and time-consuming, and we may not be able to do so or complete acquisitions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis or at all. Even if completed, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions. Our acquisitions have previously required, and any similar future transactions may also require, significant efforts and expenditures, in particular with respect to integration of acquired assets and business into our legacy operations. We may encounter unexpected difficulties, or incur unexpected costs, in connection with strategic acquisitions and integration efforts, including without limitation:

difficulties in the post-acquisition integration of operations and systems;


the termination of relationships with key personnel and customers of the acquired company;
a failure to add additional employees to manage the increased volume of business;
additional post acquisition challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning, treasury management, financial reporting and legal compliance;

risks and liabilities from our acquisitions, some of which may not be discovered during the pre-acquisition due diligence process;
a disruption of our ongoing business or an inability of our ongoing business to receive sufficient management attention; and
a failure to realize the cost savings or other financial benefits we anticipated prior to acquisition.

Failure to successfully identify suitable acquisition targets, complete strategic acquisitions, or realize the anticipated benefits of completed acquisitions, would undermine our ability to execute on our growth strategy, which would in turn have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and future prospects.

Because we have limited experience operating our oil and gas exploration and transportation businesses, our failure to effectively manage the risks and challenges inherent in such businesses could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and growth prospects.

Until we acquired Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020, we had no experience in operating its oil and gas businesses. Although Jay Puchir, Banner Midstream’s Chief Executive Officer joined us initially as our Chief Accounting Officer and then Treasurer and has continued to run the oil and gas businesses following the Banner Midstream acquisition, and Julia Olguin was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of White River Holdings Corp (“White River”), our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, we have limited experience operating these businesses, and, as a result, may encounter challenges and risks inherent in operating such businesses. If we fail to effectively manage the risks and challenges inherent in such businesses, our business, operating results, financial condition and growth prospects would be materially and adversely affected.


Our transportation business is affected by industry-wide economic factors that are largely outside our control.

With the exception of minimal revenue from our investment advisory business, our revenue is from customers in the oil exploration and production industry. As such, our volumes are largely dependent on the economy and our results may be more susceptible to trends in unemployment and how it affects oil prices than carriers that do not have this focus. We believe that some of the most significant factors beyond our control that may negatively impact our operating results are economic changes that affect supply and demand in transportation markets.

The risks associated with these factors are heightened when the United States economy is weakened. Some of the principal risks during such times are as follows:

low overall demand levels, which may impair our asset utilization;

customers with credit issues and cash flow problems we are not currently aware of;

customers bidding out our services or selecting competitors that offer lower rates, in an attempt to lower their costs, forcing us to lower our rates or lose revenue; and

more unbilled miles incurred to obtain loads.

Economic conditions that decrease shipping demand or increase the supply of capacity in the trucking transportation industry on the Territory can exert downward pressure on rates and equipment utilization, thereby decreasing asset productivity. Declining freight levels and rates, a prolonged recession or general economic instability could result in declines in our results of operations, which declines may be material.

We also are subject to cost increases outside our control that could materially reduce our profitability if we are unable to increase our rates sufficiently. Such cost increases include, but are not limited to, fuel and energy prices, driver wages, taxes and interest rates, tolls, license and registration fees, insurance premiums, regulations, revenue equipment and related maintenance costs and healthcare and other benefits for our associates. We cannot predict whether, or in what form, any such cost increase or event could occur. Any such cost increase or event could adversely affect our profitability.

In addition, events outside our control, such as strikes or other work stoppages at our facilities or at customer, port, border or other shipping locations, weather, actual or threatened armed conflicts or terrorist attacks, efforts to combat terrorism, military action against a foreign state or group located in a foreign state or heightened security requirements could lead to reduced economic demand, reduced availability of credit or temporary closing of shipping locations or United States borders. Such events or enhanced security measures in connection with such events could impair our operations and result in higher operating costs.

Fluctuations in the price or availability of fuel, the volume and terms of diesel fuel purchase commitments and surcharge collection may increase our costs related to our transportation operations, which could materially and adversely affect our margins.

Fuel represents a significant expense for our transportation business while the sale of oil and to a lesser extent natural gas provides revenues for our business. Diesel fuel prices fluctuate greatly due to factors beyond our control, such as political events, terrorist activities, armed conflicts, depreciation of the dollar against other currencies and weather, such as hurricanes, and other natural or man-made disasters, each of which may lead to an increase in the cost of fuel. Fuel prices also are affected by the rising demand in developing countries and could be adversely impacted by diminished drilling activity and by the use of crude oil and oil reserves for other purposes. Such events may lead not only to increases in fuel prices, but also to fuel shortages and disruptions in the fuel supply chain. Because our operations are dependent upon diesel fuel, and a portion of our business is based on fuel purchased on the spot market at prevailing market rates, significant diesel fuel cost increases, shortages or supply disruptions could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.


Increases in fuel costs, to the extent not offset by rate per mile increases or fuel surcharges, have an adverse effect on our operations and profitability. While a portion of our fuel costs are covered by pass-through provisions in customer contracts and compensatory fuel surcharge programs, we also incur fuel costs that cannot be recovered even with respect to customers with which we maintain fuel surcharge programs, such as those associated with unbilled miles, or the time when our engines are idling. Because our fuel surcharge recovery lags behind changes in fuel prices, our fuel surcharge recovery may not capture the increased costs we pay for fuel, especially when prices are rising, leading to fluctuations in our levels of reimbursement. Further, during periods of low freight volumes, shippers can use their negotiating leverage to impose less compensatory fuel surcharge policies. In addition, the terms of each customer’s fuel surcharge agreement vary, and customers may seek to modify the terms of their fuel surcharge agreements to minimize recoverability for fuel price increases. Such fuel surcharges may not be maintained indefinitely or may not be sufficiently effective. As of the date of this prospectus, we had no derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to fuel price fluctuations.

If we fail to retain and attract qualified drivers, including owner-operators, it could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In our transportation operations, we rely almost exclusively on the fleet of vehicles owned and operated by independent contractors. These independent contractors are responsible for maintaining and operating their own equipment and paying their own fuel, insurance, licenses and other operating costs. Due to high turnover rates, the pool of qualified independent contractor drivers is often limited, which increases competition for their services, especially during times of increased economic activity. We currently face and may in the future continue to face from time- to-time, difficulty in attracting and retaining sufficient number of qualified independent contractor drivers. Additionally, our agreements with independent contractor drivers are terminable by either party without penalty and upon short notice. Our specialty equipment services targeting servicing oil exploration and oil development industries require special training to handle unique operating requirements. We may be legally obligated or otherwise subjected by the industry standards to use physical function tests and hair follicle and urine testing to screen and test all driver applicants, which we believe is a rigorous standard and could decrease the pool of qualified applicants available to us. If we are unable to retain our existing independent contractor drivers or recruit new qualified independent contractor drivers, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The rates we offer our independent contractor drivers are subject to market conditions. Accordingly, we may be required to increase owner-operator compensation or take other measures to retain existing and attract new qualified independent contractor drivers. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain a sufficient number of independent contractor drivers, we could be required to increase our mileage rates and accessorial pay or operate with fewer trucks and face difficulty meeting our clients’ demands, which would in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

If owner-operators and their drivers that we rely upon in our transportation business were to be classified as employees instead of independent contractors, our business would be materially and adversely affected.

A number of companies in the logistics industry have been faced with legislation that requires that many independent contractors be treated as employees and receive benefits only available to employees which increases costs. To date, this legislation has been limited to California and is being considered in states where we do not operate. Some companies recently been involved in lawsuits, including class actions, and state tax and other administrative proceedings that claim that owner-operators or their drivers should be treated as employees, rather than independent contractors. These lawsuits and proceedings involve substantial monetary damages (including claims for unpaid wages, overtime, failure to provide meal and rest periods, unreimbursed business expenses and other items), injunctive relief, or both. While we believe that owner-operators and their drivers are properly classified as independent contractors rather than as employees, if their independent contractor status is challenged, we may not be successful in defending against such challenges in some or all jurisdictions in which we offer transportation services. We also may encounter a risk if the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) were to pass a rule to this effect, which could occur under the Boden administration. Furthermore, the costs associated with defending or resolving lawsuits relating to the independent contractor status of owner-operators and their drivers could be material to our business.


If legislation is passed in states where we operate, the NLRB passes a rule, or a court or an administrative agency were to determine that owner-operators and their drivers must be classified as employees rather than independent contractors, we could become subject to additional regulatory requirements, including but not limited to tax, wages, and wage and hour laws and requirements (such as those pertaining to minimum wage and overtime); employee benefits, social security, workers’ compensation and unemployment; discrimination, harassment, and retaliation under civil rights laws; claims under laws pertaining to unionizing, collective bargaining, and other concerted activity; and other laws and regulations applicable to employers and employees. Compliance with such laws and regulations would require us to incur significant additional expenses, potentially including without limitation, expenses associated with the application of wage and hour laws (including minimum wage, overtime, and meal and rest period requirements), employee benefits, social security contributions, taxes, and penalties. Additionally, any such reclassification would require us to change our business model, and consequently have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Similar to many companies, we have experienced a spike in our insurance costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Insurance premiums have recently escalated, and we are facing a similar increase in our insurance costs. Our future insurance and claims expense might exceed historical levels, which could reduce our earnings. We self-insure or maintain a high deductible for a portion of our claims exposure resulting from workers’ compensation, auto liability, general liability, cargo and property damage claims, as well as associate health insurance. Estimating the number and severity of claims, as well as related judgment or settlement amounts is inherently difficult. This, along with legal expenses, incurred but not reported claims and other uncertainties can cause unfavorable differences between actual claim costs and our reserve estimates. We plan to reserve for anticipated losses and expenses and periodically evaluate and adjust our claims reserves to reflect our experience. However, ultimate results may differ from our estimates, which could result in losses over our reserved amounts.

We maintain insurance with licensed insurance carriers above the amounts which we retain. Although we believe our aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, the amount of one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. If any claim were to exceed our coverage, we would be required to bear the excess, in addition to our other self-insured/retained amounts. As a result, our insurance and claims expense could increase, or we could raise our self-insured retention or deductible when our policies are renewed or replaced. Our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if (i) cost per claim, premiums, or the number of claims significantly exceed our estimates, (ii) there is one or more claims in excess of our coverage limits, (iii) our insurance carriers refuse to pay our insurance claims or (iv) we experience a claim for which coverage is not provided.

Risks Factors Relating to Our Technology Solutions

Our ability to execute our strategy with respect to our technology segment, depends to a large extent on the outcome of the litigation related to protection of our intellectual property rights.

As previously disclosed, in April 2021, a federal jury found in our favor on three claims and awarded us damages in the amount of $115 million in the lawsuit against Walmart Inc. Specifically, the jury found that Walmart misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. We had filed the complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, in August 2018. The complaint included claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 27, 2021, we filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Central Division a motion for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $46 million or alternatively, $13,537,000, pre-judgment interest in the amount of $16,701,000 and 0.06% post-judgment interest, accruing from April 13, 2021.


Additionally, we expect to file an appeal arguing among other things, that we should have an opportunity to prove the full extent of our damages. We expect that Walmart will appeal the jury verdict and any award of attorneys’ fees. Intellectual property and similar litigation is subject to uncertainty. There is no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts related to this lawsuit or if we are, which amounts we will be able to recover.

If we are unable to develop and generate additional demand for our technology services or products, we will likely suffer serious harm to our business.

We have invested significant resources in developing and marketing our technology services and products. Some of our services and products are often considered complex and involve a new approach to the conduct of business by our customers. As a result, intensive marketing and sales efforts may be necessary to educate prospective customers regarding the uses and benefits of our services and products in order to generate additional demand. The market for our services and products may weaken, competitors may develop superior offerings, or we may fail to develop acceptable solutions to address new market conditions. Any one of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

Undetected errors or failures in our software, products or services could result in loss or delay in the market acceptance for our products or lost sales.

Because our software services and products, and the environments in which they operate, are complex, our software and products may contain errors that can be detected at any point in its lifecycle. While we continually test our services and products for errors, errors may be found at any time in the future. Detection of any significant errors may result in, among other things, loss of, or delay in, market acceptance and sales of our services and products, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation, increased service and warranty costs, license terminations or renegotiations or costly litigation. Additionally, because our services and products support or rely on other systems and applications, any software or hardware errors or defects in these systems or applications may result in errors in the performance of our service or products, and it may be difficult or impossible to determine where the error resides.

Sales to many of our target customers involve long sales and implementation cycles, which may cause revenues and operating results to vary significantly.

A prospective customer’s decision to purchase our services or products may often involve lengthy evaluation and product qualification processes. Throughout the sales cycle, we anticipate often spending considerable time educating and providing information to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of our services and products. Budget constraints and the need for multiple approvals within these organizations may also delay the purchase decision. Failure to obtain the timely required approval for a particular project or purchase decision may delay the purchase of our services or products. As a result, we expect that the sales cycle for some of our services and products will typically range to more than 360 days, depending on the availability of funding to the prospective customer. These long cycles may cause delays in any potential sale, and we may spend a large amount of time and resources on prospective customers who decide not to purchase our services or products, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

Additionally, some of our services and products are designed for corporate customers, which will require us to recruit a sales force that understands the needs of these customers, engage in extensive negotiations and provide support to complete sales. If we do not successfully market our services and products to these targeted customers, our operating results will be below our expectations and the expectations of investors and market analysts, which would likely cause the price of our Common Stock to decline.


Patents, trademarks, copyrights and licenses are important to our technology business, and the inability to defend, obtain or renew such intellectual property could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

Through Zest Labs, the Company currently holds rights to patents and copyrights relating to certain aspects of its RFID technology, software, and services. In addition, the Company has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services”, the Zest logo, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Although the Company believes the ownership of such patents, copyrights, trademarks and service marks is an important factor in its business and that its success does depend in part on the ownership thereof, the Company relies primarily on the innovative skills, technical competence, and marketing abilities of its personnel.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to include intellectual property obtained from third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods, the Company believes, based upon past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that such licenses could be obtained at all. Loss of a significant number of licenses may have an adverse effect of the Company’s operations.

The Company relies on licenses to third-party patents and intellectual property, and the Company’s future results could be materially adversely affected if it is alleged or found to have infringed intellectual property rights.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to use third-party intellectual property, and it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods. Although the Company believes that, based on past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, there is no assurance that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable terms or at all.

If we fail to protect our proprietary information and prevent third parties from making unauthorized use of our products and technology, our financial results could be harmed.

Much of our software and underlying technology is proprietary. We seek to protect our proprietary rights through a combination of confidentiality agreements and through copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws. However, all of these measures afford only limited protection and may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented by third parties. Any patent licensed by us or issued to us could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or rights granted thereunder may not provide a competitive advantage to us. Furthermore, patent applications that we file may not result in issuance of a patent or, if a patent is issued, the patent may not be issued in a form that is advantageous to us. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights, others may independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around our patents and other rights. In addition, it is difficult to monitor compliance with, and enforce, our intellectual property in a cost-effective manner.

Third parties claiming that we infringe on their proprietary rights could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and prevent us from selling our products and services.

From time to time, third parties may claim that we have infringed on their intellectual property rights, including claims regarding patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Because of constant technological change in the markets in which we compete, the extensive patent coverage of existing technologies, and the rapid rate of issuance of new patents, it is possible that the number of these claims may grow. In addition, former employers of our former, current, or future employees may assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosed to us the confidential or proprietary information of these former employers. Any such claim, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation and distract management from day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in defending such claims, we could be required to stop selling, delay shipments of, or redesign our products, pay significant amounts as monetary damages, enter into royalty or licensing arrangements, or satisfy indemnification obligations that we have with some of our customers. Royalty or licensing arrangements that we may seek in such circumstances may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We may incur significant expenditures to investigate, defend and settle claims related to the use of technology and intellectual property rights as part of our strategy to manage this risk.


We rely on third-party manufacturers for the final assembly of certain of our product related to our technology offerings. If these third-party manufacturers were to become unavailable, we may not be able to replace them on economical terms or at all, and our business would be harmed.

A failure by such manufacturers to provide manufacturing services to us, or any disruption in such manufacturing services, may adversely affect our business. We may incur increased business disruption risk due to the dependence on these third-party manufacturers, as we are not able to exercise direct control over the assembly or related operations of certain of our products. If these third-party manufacturers experience financial difficulties or fail to meet our manufacturing needs, then we may be unable to satisfy customer product demands, lose sales, and be unable to maintain customer relationships. Longer production lead times may result in shortages of certain products and inadequate inventories during periods of unanticipated higher demand. Without such third parties continuing to manufacture our products, we may have no other means of final assembly of certain of our products until we are able to secure the manufacturing capability at another facility or develop an alternative manufacturing facility. This transition could be costly and time consuming.

The Company is subject to risks associated with laws, regulations and industry-imposed standards related to wireless communications devices.

Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the many jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Such changes, which could include but are not limited to restrictions on production, manufacture, distribution, and use of the device, may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

Because of technological changes in the business software, web and device applications, sensors and sensor-based devices, and RFID and wireless communication industries, current extensive patent coverage, and the rapid issuance of new patents, it is possible that certain components of Zest Labs’ products and business methods may unknowingly infringe the patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. From time to time, Zest Labs may be notified that it may be infringing such rights. Responding to such claims, regardless of their merit, can consume significant time and expense. In certain cases, the Company may consider the desirability of entering into licensing agreements, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. If there is a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting the Company from marketing or selling certain products or a successful claim of infringement against the Company requires it to pay royalties to a third party, the Company’s financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

The inability to obtain certain components could adversely impact the Company’s ability to deliver on its contractual commitments which could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.

 

Although most components essential to Zest Labs’the Company’s business are generally available from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID or other wireless custom integrated circuits, and application-specific integrated circuits are currently obtained by Zest Labsthe Company from single or limited sources. Some key components, while currently available to the Company from multiple sources, principally in Asia. 

Zest Labs is partare at times subject to industry-wide availability constraints and pricing pressures. If the supply of a very competitive industry that markets solutionskey or single-sourced component to fresh food supply chain users, such as fresh food growers, producers and retailers. Many other companies that are both more established and command much greater resources competethe Company were to be delayed or curtailed or in this market. While Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery offer new technical approaches and new user value, it remains uncertain if Zest Labs will gain sufficient adoptionthe event a key manufacturing vendor delayed shipment of itscompleted products to make them viablethe Company, the Company’s ability to ship related products in desired quantities, and in a timely manner, could be adversely affected. The Company’s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source, or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source. Continued availability of these components may be affected if suppliers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the Company’s requirements. The Company attempts to mitigate these potential risks by working closely with these and other key suppliers on product introduction plans, strategic inventories, coordinated product introductions, and internal and external manufacturing schedules and levels. Consistent with industry practice, the Company acquires components through a combination of formal purchase orders, supplier contracts, and open orders based on projected demand information. However, adverse changes in the market. Further, it is unclear what industry competitors are developing that might address similar user needs. Zest Labs’ products provide a new approach for industry participants, and as with any new approach, adoption is uncertain as many in the industry can be slow to embrace new technology and/or new approaches. These market challenges can lead to extended sales cycles that may include extended pilot testing often at Zest Labs’ expense, for which the outcome remains unclear until the completion of each test. For these reasons, and others, forecasting new business adoption and future revenue can be very difficult and volatile.  However, the Company believes that Zest Fresh offers fresh food retailers, growers, shippers, processors and distributors an opportunity to differentiate their businesses in ways that the shipment of canned and boxed food products cannot, as competition in the agriculture, grocery, food service and restaurant markets continues to accelerate. 

Acquisition of 440 Labs

On May 18, 2017, the Company entered into an exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Zest Labs, 440labs, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (“440labs”), SphereIt, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company (“SphereIt”) and three of 440labs’ executive employees. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, on May 23, 2017 the Company acquired all of the shares of 440labs in exchange for 300 sharessupply chain of the Company’s commonvendors may adversely impact the supply of key components.

28

General Risks

Our future success depends on our ability to retain and attract high-quality personnel, and the efforts, abilities and continued service of our senior management.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain a number of highly skilled employees and on the service and performance of our senior management team and other key personnel, including service center managers. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees and inadequate succession planning could cause substantial disruption to our business operations, deplete our institutional knowledge base and erode our competitive advantage, which would adversely affect our business. Competition for qualified personnel possessing the skills necessary to implement our strategy is intense, and we may fail to attract or retain the employees necessary to execute our business model successfully. We do not have “key person” life insurance policies covering any of our executive officers, other than Peter Mehring, the president of Zest Labs.

Our success will depend to a significant degree upon the continued efforts of our key management, engineering and other personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. In particular, we believe that our future success is highly dependent on Randy May, our Chief Executive Officer, William Hoagland, our Chief Financial Officer, Jay Puchir, our Treasurer and CEO and President of Banner Midstream Corp., Peter Mehring, President of Zest Labs, and Julia Olguin, the Chief Executive Officer of White River. If any members of our management team leave our employment, our business could suffer, and the share price of our Common Stock could decline.

If we cannot manage our growth effectively, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We have recently experienced significant growth commencing with and following the Banner Acquisition. Our business model relies on our rapidly growing our oil and gas drilling and transportation businesses. Businesses that grow rapidly often have difficulty managing their growth while maintaining their compliance and quality standards. If we continue to grow as rapidly as we anticipate, we will need to expand our management by recruiting and employing additional executive and key personnel capable of providing the necessary support. There can be no assurance that our management, along with our staff, will be able to effectively manage our growth. Our failure to meet the challenges associated with rapid growth could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which requires, among other things, that public companies maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.

Although our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2021, any failure to maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement in the future could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired, which could result in loss of investor confidence and could have an adverse effect on our stock issuedprice.


Failure of information technology systems or data security breaches, including as the result of cyber security attacks, affecting us, our business associates, or our industry, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We depend on information technology systems and services in conducting our business. We and others in the industries in which we operate use these technologies for internal purposes, including data storage and processing, transmissions, as well as in our interactions with our business associates. Examples of these digital technologies include analytics, automation, and cloud services. If any of our financial, operational, or other data processing systems are compromised, fail or have other significant shortcomings, it could disrupt our business, require us to SphereIt. 440labsincur substantial additional expenses, result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

For example, the operator of the Colonial Pipeline was forced to pay $4.4 million in ransom to hackers as the result of a cyberattack disabling the pipeline for several days in May 2021. The attack also resulted in gasoline price increases and shortages across the East Coast of the United States. As we depend on the availability and price of gasoline in our transportation business, any significant increase in the price and/or shortage of gasoline would have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Because our Common Stock trades on the OTCQB, we are subject to the unwillingness of most institutional investors to purchase our Common Stock as well as the general limited liquidity of that trading market.

Our Common Stock is a cloud and mobile software developercurrently traded on the OTCQB, which is nownot a subsidiary of Zest Labs. 440labs’ three executive employees signed employment agreements pursuant tonational securities exchange. Most institutional investors will only purchase securities which eachtrade on one of the markets operated by the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange. As a result, the OTCQB is generally less liquid than the leading stock exchanges. While the market for our Common Stock has been relatively active, we believe our failure to be listed on a leading national securities exchange has reduced our liquidity. We cannot assure you that our recent liquidity will be maintained or that investors will not encounter difficulties in selling their Common Stock in the future at present levels or if the absence of sufficient liquidity will harm our stockholders in the future.

Future sales of our Common Stock in the public market could lower the price of our Common Stock and impair our ability to raise funds in future securities offerings.

Of 22,820,573 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 15, 2021, approximately 17,832,456 shares are held by investors who are not our affiliates or holders of restricted stock. All of these shares of unrestricted stock are freely tradeable. The remaining shares may be sold subject to the volume limits of Rule 144 which limits sales by any affiliate to 1% of outstanding shares in any three-month period. Future sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the then prevailing market price of our Common Stock and could make it more difficult for us to raise funds in the future through an offering of our securities.

The price of our Common Stock is subject to volatility, including for reasons unrelated to our operating performance, which could lead to losses by investors and costly securities litigation.

The trading price of our Common Stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate in response to a number of factors, some of which may be outside our control, including but not limited to, the following factors:

any announcements relating to our pending Walmart litigation;

actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;

Developments relating to the Walmart litigation;

changes in market valuations of companies in the oil and gas industry;

announcements of developments by us or our competitors;

future oil prices;


announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, capital commitments, significant contracts, or other material developments that may affect our prospects;

the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic and shutdowns in the Territory;

adoption of new accounting standards affecting our industry;

additions or departures of key personnel;

sales of our Common Stock or other securities in the open market; and

other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

The stock market is subject to significant price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against such a company. Litigation initiated against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and Company resources, which could harm our business and financial condition.

Future changes in the fair value of outstanding warrants could result in volatility of our reported results of operations.

Because of the derivative liability caused by our outstanding warrants, the increase or decrease in our Common Stock price each quarter (measured from the first day to the last day) is either a non-cash expense or income. If the price rises as it did in the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2021, we are required to report the expense, which increases our actual operating loss. Contrarily a price decrease in a given quarter will cause us to report income. This could cause our reporting results to fluctuate otherwise as the result of our performance, which would increase volatility in our stock price.

We have recently experienced fluctuations in the market price of our Common Stock and if it again becomes subject to the “penny stock” rules, brokers will not generally solicit the purchase of our Common Stock, which would adversely affect the liquidity and market price of our Common Stock.

We have recently experienced wide fluctuations in the price of our Common Stock. For example, our stock price decreased from approximately $12.00 per share in early April 2021 to approximately $3.25 in mid-May 2021, resulting in our Common Stock to be considered a “penny stock” under SEC rules. The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” as an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. Such exceptions include among others any equity security listed on a national securities exchange and any equity security issued by an issuer that has (i) net tangible assets of at least $2,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for three executive employees received 100years, net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years, or (iii) average annual revenue of at least $6,000,000 for the last three years. Although the market price of our Common Stock on OTCQB was $6.25 per share as of June 28, 2021, there is no assurance that our stock price will rise or stay above $5.00 per share. The “penny stock” designation requires any broker-dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. These rules limit the ability of broker-dealers to solicit purchases of our Common Stock and therefore reduce its liquidity.

Moreover, as a result of apparent regulatory pressure from the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, a growing number of broker-dealers decline to permit investors, or otherwise make it difficult, to purchase and sell “penny stocks.” The “penny stock” designation may have a depressive effect upon our Common Stock price.

Because we can issue “blank check” preferred stock without stockholder approval, it could adversely impact the rights of holders of our Common Stock.

Under our Articles of Incorporation our Board of Directors may approve an issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock without seeking stockholder approval. Any additional shares of preferred stock that we issue in the future may rank ahead of our Common Stock in terms of dividend or liquidation rights and may have greater voting rights than our Common Stock. In addition, such preferred stock may contain provisions allowing those shares to be converted into shares of Common Stock, which could dilute the value of Common Stock to current stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. In addition, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company. Although we have no present intention to issue any additional shares of authorized preferred stock, there can be no assurance that we will not do so in the future.


The approval of the application to list our Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market was significantly delayed due to factors outside our control; because our stock price is below the required minimum bid price of $4, our listing application may not be approved in the near future or at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our stock price and liquidity.

Last year we applied to list our Common Stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”). In December 2020 we effected a one-for-five reverse split of the Company’s commonissued and outstanding Common Stock and conducted a registered offering of Common Stock and warrants, in each case to meet the Nasdaq quantitative initial listing requirements. Following the reverse split and the December 2020 capital raise we believe we continued to meet the Nasdaq initial listing standards until a decrease in our stock and became employed by Zest Labs. Oneprice mid-April 2021. As of those employees resigned, and that position was filled with a new employee.the date of this Form 10-K our listing application remained pending.

 

The acquisitionAt the time we effected the reverse stock split, we did not know that the approval of 440labsour listing application was being delayed by Nasdaq pending an inquiry by FINRA involving potential manipulation of our Common Stock. Since we never engaged in May 2017 allowed Zest Labs to internally maintainany investor relations activities, we always assumed any alleged manipulation did not involve Ecoark or its software development and information solutions for cloud, mobile, and IoT applications. 440labs had been a key development partner with Zest Labs for more than four years prior tomanagement. Nasdaq recently advised us that the May 2017 acquisition, contributing its expertise in scalable enterprise cloud solutions and mobile applications.FINRA inquiry will no longer prevent it from approving our listing application once we satisfy the $4 minimum bid price requirement.

 

Discontinued OperationsEven if we meet the $4 bid price requirement, there is no assurance that our listing application will be approved in the near future or at all. We have no intention at this time to effect another reverse stock split. If our listing application is not approved, our Common Stock will continue to trade on the OTCQB, which would affect the liquidity and price of our Common Stock.

 

Significant transactions related to discontinued operations include the following transactions.Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

Sale of Eco3dNone.

 

On April 14, 2017, the Company sold the assets, liabilities and membership interests in Eco3d to a group led by executives of Eco3d after the Company’s Board concluded that Eco3d did not fit the future strategic direction of the Company. The Company received $2,029 in cash and 560 shares of the Company’s common stock that were held by executives of Eco3d, which shares were canceled. In accordance with ASC 205-20 and having met the criteria for “held for sale”, the Company reflected amounts relating to Eco3d as a disposal group classified as held for sale at March 31, 2017 and included them as part of discontinued operations for the all periods presented. There was no significant continuing involvement with Eco3d following the sale. Gain on the sale of $636 was recognized in the Company’s quarter ended June 30, 2017. 

Sable

On May 3, 2016, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement by and among the Company, Pioneer Products, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company (“Sable”), and the holder of all of Sable’s membership interests. The Company issued 2,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of Sable’s membership interests. Sable has since been a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Products. In May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Pioneer and Sable.

On March 12, 2019 Sable sold substantially all of its assets other than cash and receivables to Kal-Polymers Americas, LLC (“Kal”) for $1,553, $825 of which was paid at closing and $726 was paid subsequent to March 31, 2019. Kal assumed the lease obligations of Sable, and the Company agreed to perform certain transition services for Kal for up to six months, principally accounting and systems support. That support has now been completed.

CompetitionItem 2. Properties

 

The Company operatesdoes not own any real property. It currently leases office space in marketsSan Antonio, Texas. The current property lease is considered adequate for productsoperations and services that are highly competitivethis lease runs through November 2023. In addition a subsidiary leases space in Kilgore, Texas for a term of 42 months through September 30, 2022.

As of March 31, 2021, our acreage is comprised of approximately 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and face aggressive competitionMississippi. We acquired certain oil and gas properties as part of the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020, and during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 continued to focus on expanding our exploration and production footprint and capabilities by acquiring real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases.


The Company had an analysis completed by an independent petroleum consulting company in March 2021 to complete the acquisition analysis within the required one-year period. The analysis required an asset allocation of the oil and gas reserves from the acquisitions noted above and also required the Company to impair certain reserves acquired.

Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

As of March 31, 2021 and 2020, all areas of their business.our proved oil and natural gas reserves were located in the United States, in the States of Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana. The Company did not have any proved oil and natural gas reserves prior to the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

 

The marketfollowing tables set forth summary information with respect to our proved reserves as of March 31, 2021 and 2020. For additional information see Supplemental Information “Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)” to our consolidated financial statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Proved reserves as of March 31, 2021 (Numbers in thousands, except per barrel):

Reserve Category Crude Oil (Mbbl)  Natural Gas (MMcf)  Total Proved (BOE)(1) 
Proved Reserves         
Developed  463       -   463 
Developed Non-Producing  -   -   - 
Undeveloped  -   -   - 
             
Total Proved Reserves  463   -   463 
             
Estimated Future Net Cash Flows(2)         $10,570 
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows          (3,347)
             
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows – (PV10)(3)         $7,223 

(1)BOE (barrels of oil equivalent) is calculated by a ratio of 6 MCF to 1 BBL of oil
(2)Prices used for net cash flow are based on the 12 month average of the wti cushing price reference. an average benchmark of $40.01/bbl and average realized price of $38.54/bbl were analyzed with the realized price ultimately used in the cash flow analysis.
(3)PV10 represents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved oil and natural gas reserves discounted at 10%. pv-10 of our total year-end proved reserves is considered a non-us gaap financial measure as defined by the sec. we believe that presentation of the pv-10 is relevant and useful to our investors because it presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved reserves. we further believe investors and creditors use our pv-10 as a basis for comparison of the relative size and value of our reserves to other companies.


Proved reserves as of March 31, 2020 (Numbers in thousands, except per barrel):

Reserve Category Crude Oil (Mbbl)  Natural Gas (MMcf)  Total Proved (BOE)(1) 
Proved Reserves         
Developed  17         -   17 
Developed Non-Producing  -   -   - 
Undeveloped  -   -   - 
             
Total Proved Reserves  17   -   17 
             
Estimated Future Net Cash Flows(2)         $(128)
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows          40 
             
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows – (PV10)(3)         $(88)

(1)BOE (barrels of oil equivalent) is calculated by a ratio of 6 MCF to 1 BBL of oil
(2)Prices used for net cash flow are based on the 12 month average of the wti cushing price reference. an average benchmark of $55.77/bbl and average realized price of $45.91/bbl were analyzed with the realized price ultimately used in the cash flow analysis.
(3)PV10 represents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved oil and natural gas reserves discounted at 10%. pv-10 of our total year-end proved reserves is considered a non-us gaap financial measure as defined by the sec. we believe that presentation of the pv-10 is relevant and useful to our investors because it presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved reserves. we further believe investors and creditors use our pv-10 as a basis for comparison of the relative size and value of our reserves to other companies.


The following table presents certain information with respect to oil and natural gas production attributable to our interests in all of our properties in the United States, the reserve derived from the sale of such production, average sales price received and average production costs for cloud-based, real-time supply chain analytic solutions—the marketyear ended March 31, 2021 and during the 4 day period after the Banner Midstream acquisition between March 28, 2020 and the fiscal year-end on March 31, 2020. Numbers in thousands except average barrel or production sales and costs.

  Units of Measure March 31,
2021
 
Production     
Oil Barrels  463 
Natural Gas Mcf  - 
BOE    463 
       
Sales      
Oil Barrels $16,657 
Natural Gas Mcf $- 
       
Average Sales Price      
Oil Barrels $38.54 
Natural Gas Mcf $- 
       
Production – Lease Operating Expenses   $6,089 
       
Average Cost of Production per BOE   $13.15 

Units of MeasureMarch 31,
2020
Production
OilBarrels    -
Natural GasMcf-
BOE-
Sales
OilBarrels$-
Natural GasMcf$-
Average Sales Price
OilBarrels$-
Natural GasMcf$-
Production – Lease Operating Expenses$-
Average Cost of Production per BOE$-

Drilling and other exploratory activities:

During the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company undertook a drilling program and pre-funded approximately $5,800,000 of the cost, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387,000 has been expensed as drilling costs. For the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company acquired Banner Midstream and all activities and properties owned by them at the time of acquisition. Other than some minor drilling in that four-day period of time that the Company owned Banner Midstream, no material activities occurred.

Present activities:

The Company is assessing all of its properties at the present time to determine any future drilling activities to commence.

Delivery commitments:

The Company is not currently committed to provide a fixed and determinable quantity of oil and gas in the near future under existing contracts or agreements.


Productive Wells

The following table sets forth the number of wells in our inventory, in which Zest Labs competes—we maintained an operated ownership interest as of March 31, 2021.

Well Category: Oil  Gas 
       
Active Producer  29   - 
Inactive Producer  63   11 
Shut-In  2   1 
Plugged & Abandoned  1   - 
Active Salt Water Disposal (SWD)  19   - 
Inactive SWD  2   - 
         
   116   12 

The following table sets forth the number of wells in our inventory, in which we maintained ownership interests as of March 31, 2020.

Well Category: Oil  Gas 
       
Active Producer  9   - 
Inactive Producer  41   - 
Shut-In  3   1 
Plugged & Abandoned  1   - 
Active Salt Water Disposal (SWD)  1   - 
Inactive SWD  -   - 
         
   55   1 


Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are presently involved in the following legal proceedings in Arkansas and Florida. To the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is rapidly evolving. contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of our properties or businesses are subject, which would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

On August 1, 2018, Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Zest Labs, Inc. filed a complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest a total of $115 million in damages which includes $65 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. liable on three claims. The federal jury found that Walmart Inc. misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. On April 27, 2021, we filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Central Division a motion for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $46,000,000 or alternatively, $13,536,803, pre-judgment interest in the amount of $16,700,548 and 0.06% post-judgment interest, accruing from April 13, 2021. 

On December 12, 2018, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in Sarasota County, Florida by certain investors who invested in the Company before it was public. The complaint alleges that the investment advisors who solicited the investors to invest into the Company made omissions and misrepresentations concerning the Company and the shares. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint which is pending. 

In the opinion of management, there are no other legal matters involving us that would have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted OTC Markets’ OTCQB tier under the symbol “ZEST”. Any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

38

Holders

As of the date of this filing, we had approximately 169 holders of record of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is Philadelphia Stock Transfer, located at 2320 Haverford Road, Suite 230, Ardmore, Pennsylvania 19003.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. The payment of dividends on our common stock in the future will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, operating and financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors may consider appropriate.  

We currently expect to use all available funds to finance the future development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

There are several new competitorswere no sales of unregistered securities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 other than those transactions previously reported to the SEC on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data [RESERVED]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations describes the principal factors affecting the results of our operations, financial condition, and changes in financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with competing technologies, including companies that have greater resources than Ecoark Holdings, which operatethe accompanying audited financial statements, and notes thereto, included elsewhere in this space. Somereport. The information contained in this discussion is subject to a number of these companies are subsidiariesrisks and uncertainties. We urge you to review carefully the sections of large publicly traded companies that have brand recognition, established relationships with retailers, and own the manufacturing process.

this report entitled “

Sales and Marketing

 

We sell ourThrough Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries, the Company sells and provides services to its customers via a blanket master services agreement (MSA). Banner Midstream sells hydrocarbon to midstream providers such as Plains Marketing L.P. and Shell Trading (US) Company.

The Company markets its technology products and services principally through direct sales efforts and the utilization of third-party agents. Zest Labs has marketing operations and programs for demand generation, public relations, and branding/messaging. messaging that are scaled based on market engagement and available resources.

Trend Holdings and its subsidiaries provide fund administration and fund formation services to institutional investors and market their services through private marketing.


Government Regulations

Banner Midstream

Oil and gas production is regulated under a wide range of federal and state statutes, rules, orders and regulations. State and federal statutes and regulations require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. The states in which we operate, Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and New Mexico (the “Territory”), have regulations governing conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from oil and gas wells, the regulation of spacing, and requirements for plugging and abandonment of wells. Also, states in the Territory impose a severance tax on production and sales of oil, and gas within its jurisdiction. Failure to comply with these rules and regulations can result in substantial penalties. Our competitors in the oil and gas industry are subject to the same regulatory requirements and restrictions that affect our operations.

Zest Labs

Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates.  The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”), is responsible for the assignment of spectrum for non-government use in the United States in accordance with regulations established by an international organization known as the International Telecommunications Union (the “ITU”). Any ITU or FCC reallocation of radio frequency spectrum, including frequency band segmentation or sharing of spectrum, could cause interference with the reception of GPS signals and may materially and adversely affect the utility and reliability of Zest Labs’ products, which would, in turn, cause a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Environmental Compliance Expenses

We are currently not experiencing any material expenses related to the environmental compliance. Please review Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report with regard to potential environmental compliance expenses.

Environmental, Social and Governance Strategy (ESG)

We are currently evaluating an environmentally conscious cryptocurrency mining approach to focus on and analyze innovative and valuable ways to deploy capital. We are focused on opportunities related to ESG technologies for hydrocarbon emissions and reductions in energy waste. We have formulated an approach to pursue regionally constrained energy that is otherwise lost due to a lack of commercial infrastructure to economically process and/or transport the natural gas to market. This approach is designed to drive significant molecule value through the energy intensive process of cryptocurrency mining. This strategy is anticipated to incubate green energy project development and growth by balancing regional power grid demands during times of heightened use.

 

Research and Development

 

We have devoted a substantial amount of our resources to software and hardware development activities in recent years, principally for the Zest Labs initiatives. Ecoark Holdings has analyzedbelieves that, analyzing the competitive factors affecting the market for the solutions and services its subsidiaries provide, and believes its products and services compete favorably by offering integrated solutions to customers. The Company has incurred research and development expenses of $3,320$883,000 and $5,576 for$2,472,000 in the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively, to develop its solutions and differentiate those solutions from competitive offerings. We did not capitalizeincurred no capitalized software development costs in the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 2018, nor2020.


Intellectual Property

The Company, through Zest Labs, currently holds rights to 75 U.S. patents (with additional patents pending), numerous related foreign patents, and U.S. copyrights relating to certain aspects of its Zest software, hardware devices including Radio-Frequency Identification (“RFID”) technology, software, and services. In addition, Zest Labs has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in any prior period.the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services,” and the Zest, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery logos, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Many of Zest Labs’ products have been designed to include licensed intellectual property obtained from third-parties. Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates. 

No Foreign Operations

No foreign operations are expected in connection with the Company’s business. 

Seasonality

Our business experiences a certain level of seasonality due to our oil and gas exploration and transportation business. Demand for oil, natural gas and energy is typically higher in the third and fourth quarters resulting in higher prices. Due to these seasonal fluctuations, results of operations for individual quarterly periods may not be indicative of the results that may be realized on an annual basis. Seasonal weather conditions and lease stipulations can limit drilling and producing activities and other oil and natural gas operations in a portion of our operating areas of trucking business. These seasonal anomalies can pose challenges for the drilling objectives and can increase competition for equipment, supplies and personnel during the spring and summer months, which could lead to shortages and increase costs or delay operations, thus, lowering the demand for trucking services.

Dependence on One or Few Major Customers

From time to time we may have customers generating 10 percent or more of the Company’s consolidated revenues, and loss of such customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Human Capital Resources

As of the date of this report, we have 45 full-time employees and 106 owner-operator truck drivers.

Our ability to successfully execute our strategic initiatives is highly dependent on recruiting and retaining skilled personnel and qualified drivers. Our compensation philosophy is based on incentivizing and rewarding performance, with alignment of individual, corporate, and stockholder interests. Compensation includes salaries, benefits, and equity participation. Our owner operator drivers are not salaried employees.

We are committed to the health, safety, and well-being of our employees and drivers. We follow applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and guidance. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented measures to enable employees to work remotely and have utilized cloud-based productivity and communications systems to facilitate distributed work.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to ensure that all employees maintain the highest standards of business conduct in every aspect of their dealings with each other, customers, suppliers, vendors, service providers, stockholders, and governmental authorities.

We believe the relations with our employees and drivers are satisfactory.

1710

 

  

Intellectual PropertyItem 1A. Risk Factors

 

Zest LabsInvesting in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K before deciding to invest in our Common Stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects, as well as our ability to accomplish our strategic objectives. As a result, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations and stock price.

Summary Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that you should consider before investing in our common stock. Set forth below is a summary of the principal risks we face:

we have incurred significant losses since inception, we may continue to incur losses and negative cash flows in the future;

because we require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, our inability to generate and obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects;

significant ongoing capital requirements related to our exploration and production and transportation business;

the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. and global economy, and the uncertainty relating to its continuation and the pace of economic recovery;

the uncertainty of future results due to limited operating history;

we may be required to recognize goodwill impairment charges, which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results;

we may be required to record significant non-cash impairment charges related to a reduction in the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties;

the uncertainty of future results due to limited operating history;

our future cash flows and results of operations, are highly dependent on our ability to efficiently develop our current oil reserves and economically find or acquire additional recoverable reserves;

the dependence of our future operating results on oil and gas prices that are highly volatile;

future changes in the climate change regulatory regime and continued focus on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) regulation and sustainability initiatives, which would have the effect of reducing demand for fossil fuels and negatively impact our operating results, stock price and ability to access capital markets;

potential future changes in the regulation of hydraulic fracturing;

potential inability to retain and attract qualified drivers, including owner-operators;

potential risk that the drivers who we rely upon in our transportation business will be classified as employees rather than independent contractors; and

the uncertainty related to the outcome of the pending Walmart litigation related to the protection of our intellectual property rights.


Risk Factors Relating to Our Financial Condition

We had incurred net losses on an annual basis since our inception and may continue to experience losses and negative cash flow in the future.

As of June 22, 2021, we had cash (including restricted cash) of approximately $1,194,235. Prior to the acquisition of Banner Midstream, we funded our operations principally through the sale of our capital stock and debt instruments. On December 31, 2020, we raised approximately $7,666,000 in net proceeds from the sale of 889,000 shares of common stock and short-term warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 889,000 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering. We have also raised substantial operating cash through the exercise of our warrants issued in capital raises over the past two years. Banner Midstream had financed its operations primarily through the issuance of debt securities. We have not been profitable on an annual basis since inception and had previously incurred significant operating losses. We recorded a net loss of approximately $20,888,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. Approximately 42% of the reported net loss for this fiscal year was due to non-cash charges, including a $18,518,000 non-cash charge from a change in the fair value of our warrant derivative liabilities and $21,084,000 in gain on exchange of warrants. While our warrant derivative liabilities cause us to incur a non-cash loss if our stock price goes up in a given quarter or a non-cash gain if it goes down in a quarter, we have experienced substantial exercises since the date of our July 28, 2020 prospectus registering the underlying shares of Common Stock. As of March 31, 2021, no warrants remained unexercised out of approximately 1,176,000 warrants (on a post-reverse split basis) we issued in 2020. However, we have an additional approximately 1,035,000 warrants (on a post-reverse split basis) which have derivative liabilities that will impact our future operating results. Although we expect our revenues to increase from our energy business, we will likely continue to incur losses and experience negative cash flows from operations for the foreseeable future. If we cannot achieve positive cash flow from operations or net income, it may make it more difficult to raise capital based on our Common Stock on acceptable terms.

Because we require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, our inability to generate and obtain such capital on acceptable terms, or at all, could harm our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

Since the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020, we have increased our operating expenses in supporting our underlying business and consummating acquisitions of oil and gas properties. We intend to continue to make substantial investments to fund our business and support our growth. Among other things, we need to raise capital through the issuance of equity or debt in order to fund the drilling of oil wells for our previously announced joint venture with a Texas exploration company. Since we do not currently have a debt facility to support our growth and acquisition strategy, we are seeking to fund our growth through equity offerings at opportune times when the price of our Common Stock and external factors provide an opportunity. The availability and terms of any future financing will be dependent upon a variety of other factors which may affect the price of our Common Stock including among other things:

The pace of economic recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic;

The condition of the capital markets in general and those for smaller capitalization issuers in particular;

The effect of the potential new legislation, regulation or government action which directly affect our business such as environmental, social and governance (“ESG”), climate change, oil and gas drilling, fracking, growing market for electric vehicles and efforts to ban fossil fuels, and legislation such as California’s AB5 which causes us to treat our owner-operators in our trucking business as employees, which will tend to increase our expenses;

The impact of ESG measures, potential new rules and recent stockholder votes of large energy producers on the investment community and disclosure practices;

The possibility that certain investors concerned about potential effects of climate change would limit or eliminate their investments in oil and gas companies and the growth of the alternative-energy markets with so-called “green” funds trading at record highs;

Potential regulation or government action requiring financial institutions to adopt policies that limit funding of fossil fuels companies; and

International factors including political unrest which may reduce the prices of oil and gas.

We may not be able to obtain such additional financing on the terms favorable to us, or at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business may be adversely impacted. In addition, our inability to generate or obtain the financial resources needed may require us to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our operations and sell some of our assets. For example, in May 2021, we assigned certain of our working interests in oil and gas leases in exchange for $600,000 in order to obtain the necessary working capital. If we were forced to delay, scale back, or eliminate some or all of our operations or sell a significant portion of our assets it would have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Further, if we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity or debt securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our Common Stock. Any debt financing that we may secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had 67 patents issued bycaused and may continue to cause a significant disruption to the United States Patent and Trademark Office,global economy, and its continuation for any extended period of time may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and future prospects.

The global COVID-19 pandemic and the unprecedented actions taken by U.S. federal, state and local governments and governments around the world in order to stop the spread of the virus have had and continue to have a profound impact on the U.S. and global economy, disrupting global supply chains and creating significant volatility in the financial markets. The contraction of the economy caused by the pandemic has, among other things, severely impacted demand for fossil fuels resulting in sharp decline in oil and gas prices. Oil demand significantly deteriorated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding preventative measures taken around the world to mitigate its spread, including “shelter-in-place” orders, quarantines, executive orders and similar government orders and restrictions for their residents to control the spread of COVID-19.

Although oil prices have increased in the past few months due to, among other things, the Biden administration anti-fossil fuel agenda, the vaccine rollouts and the decision by OPEC to restrain output into mid-2021, there can be no assurance that this increase will continue.

Future disruptions and/or uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, among others, delays in vaccine rollouts and the emergence of new variants of the virus, for a sustained period of time could have a material adverse impact on our business, our ability to execute our strategy and to realize the full benefits of the Banner Midstream acquisition. Our production and transportation businesses will likely be significantly affected if there is another reduction in oil prices or reduced demand for our services, caused by a global recession due to the ongoing effects of COVID-19. 

Furthermore, the effect of the pandemic on financial markets and on our Company may limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future on the terms acceptable to us at the time we need it, or at all.


We will need additional capital to support our operations and growth.

Until we achieve sustained profitability, we will need to raise additional capital through public or private financing transactions or secure a debt facility to support our operations and execute our growth strategy. We may not be able to obtain additional financing in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. We could also be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or otherwise at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable, and we may be required to relinquish rights to some of our current master service agreements or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects. Even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations.

If we are able to close an equity financing, it may be very dilutive to our existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will complete any financing or secure a debt facility. If we are unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired and may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue one or more of the lines of operations and/or sell more assets, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We cannot predict our future results because we have a limited operating history.

We acquired our oil and gas business on March 27, 2020, which currently accounts for almost all of our revenues. Given our limited operating history, it may be difficult to evaluate our future performance or prospects. You should consider the uncertainties that we may encounter as a company that should still be considered an early stage company. These uncertainties include:

our ability to market our services and products for a profit;

our ability to secure and retain key customers; and

our evolving business model.

If we are not able to address successfully some or all of these uncertainties, we may not be able to expand our business, compete effectively or achieve profitability.

Because we must periodically evaluate our goodwill for impairment, we could be required to recognize non-cash impairment charges in future periods which could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

A considerable portion of our consolidated assets consists of goodwill. The Company recorded approximately $3.2 million of goodwill in connection with the Trend Holdings acquisition in May 2019, and approximately $7.0 million in connection with the Banner Midstream acquisition in March 2020. We assess goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth fiscal quarter and whenever facts or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the Company’s goodwill may be impaired. Impairment analysis involves comparing the estimated fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, we record an impairment charge. Determination of fair value requires considerable judgment and is sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions, estimates and market factors. Those assessments may be affected by (i) positive or negative reserve adjustments, (ii) results of drilling activities, (iii) management’s outlook for commodity prices and costs and expenses, (iv) changes in our market capitalization, (v) changes in our weighted average cost of capital and (vi) changes in income taxes. If we are required to recognize noncash charges related to impairment of goodwill, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected. 

14

Risk Factors Relating to Our Exploration and Production and Transportation Operations

We have significant ongoing capital requirements that could affect our profitability if we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms.

The Company has pre-funded approximately $5,800,000 of the cost, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387,000 has been expensed as drilling costs, and we expect to continue to incur expenses related to our previously announced joint drilling venture. In addition, our transportation business is capital intensive and asset heavy, and our policy of maintaining a young, technology-equipped fleet requires us to expend significant amounts in capital expenditures annually. We expect to pay for projected capital expenditures with cash flows from operations or the proceeds from equity sales. If we were unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, we would need to seek alternative sources of capital, including financing, to meet our capital requirements. In the event that we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations or obtain financing on favorable terms in the future, we may have to limit our fleet size, enter into less favorable financing arrangements or operate our revenue equipment for longer periods, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our profitability.

Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is intense, making it more difficult for us to market the oil and gas we produce, to acquire interests in new leases, to secure trained personnel and appropriate services, and to raise capital.

Banner Midstream is a relatively small participant in its industry and we face significant competition from major energy companies with substantial financial, management, technical and other resources as well as large and other privately held businesses which have competitive advantages. Our cost of operations is highly dependent on third-party services, and competition for these services can be significant, especially in times when commodity prices are rising.  Similarly, we compete for trained, qualified personnel, and in times of lower prices for the commodities we produce, we and other companies with similar production profiles may not be able to attract and retain this talent.  Our ability to acquire and develop reserves in the future will depend on our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment for acquiring properties, marketing oil and gas and securing trained personnel.  Also, there is substantial competition for capital available for investment in the oil and gas industry.  Our competitors may be able to pay more for personnel, property and services and to attract capital at lower rates.  This may become more likely if prices for natural gas increase faster than prices for oil, as oil comprises a greater percentage of our overall production and transportation business. Because of our small size, we may be more affected than larger competitors.

Unless we replace our existing reserves with new ones and develop those reserves, our reserves and production will decline, which would adversely affect our future cash flows and results of operations.

Producing oil reservoirs generally are characterized by declining production rates that vary depending upon reservoir characteristics and other factors. Unless we conduct successful ongoing exploration and development activities or continually acquire properties containing proved reserves, our proved reserves will decline as those reserves are produced. Our future reserves and production, and therefore our future cash flow and results of operations, are highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing our current reserves and economically finding or acquiring additional recoverable reserves. We may not be able to develop, find or acquire sufficient additional reserves to replace our current and future production. If we are unable to replace our current and future production, the value of our reserves will decrease, and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.


Drilling for and producing crude oil involves significant risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our drilling and production activities are subject to many risks, including the risk that we will not discover commercially productive reservoirs. Drilling for crude oil can be unprofitable, not only from dry holes, but from productive wells that do not produce sufficient revenues to return a profit. In addition, our drilling and producing operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of other factors, including but not limited to:

unusual or unexpected geological formations and miscalculations;
fires;
explosions and blowouts;
pipe or cement failures;
environmental hazards, such as natural gas leaks, oil spills, pipeline and tank ruptures, encountering naturally occurring radioactive materials, and unauthorized discharges of toxic gases, brine, well stimulation and completion fluids, or other pollutants into the surface and subsurface environment;
loss of drilling fluid circulation;
title problems for the properties on which we drill and resulting restrictions or termination of lease for oil drilling and production operations;
facility or equipment malfunctions;
unexpected operational events, especially the need to drill significantly deeper than originally contemplated or finding, despite an engineering study to the contrary, that the drilling site is a dry hole that produces no appreciable amounts of crude oil or no crude oil;
shortages of skilled personnel or unexpected loss of key drilling and production workers;
shortages or delivery delays of equipment and services or of water used in hydraulic fracturing activities;
compliance with environmental and other regulatory requirements and any unexpected remedial requirements for violations of environmental or other regulatory requirements;
stockholder  activism and activities by non-governmental organizations to restrict the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas so as to minimize emissions of greenhouse gases of “GHG’s”;
natural disasters; and
adverse weather conditions.

Any of these risks can cause substantial losses, including personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution, environmental contamination, clean-up responsibilities, loss of wells, repairs to resume operations; and regulatory fines or penalties. Further, our exposure to operational risks may increase as our drilling activity expands.

We may not be insured or fully insured against certain of the above operational risks, either due to unavailability of such insurance or the high premiums and deductibles. The occurrence of an event that is not covered in full or in part by insurance could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Legislation, regulations or government actions related to climate change, greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability initiatives and other ESG laws, regulations and government action, could result in increased compliance and operating costs and reduced demand for fossil fuels, and concern in financial and investment markets over greenhouse gasses and fossil fuel production could adversely affect demand for our products, limit our access to capital and depress the price of our Common Stock.

Since he took office in January 2021, President Biden has signed a series of executive orders seeking to adopt new regulations to address climate change and to suspend, revise, or rescind certain prior agency actions which were part of the Trump Administration’s de-regulatory push, and the Biden Administration is expected to continue to aggressively seek to regulate the energy industry and seek to eliminate in time the use of fossil fuels. The new executive orders include, among other things, orders requiring a review of current federal lands leasing and permitting practices, as well as a temporary halt of new leasing of federal lands and offshore waters available for oil and gas exploration, directing federal agencies to eliminate subsidies for fossil fuels, and to develop a plan to improve climate-related disclosures.

In January 2021, President Biden also issued an executive order calling for methane emissions regulations to be reviewed and for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) to establish new standards by September 2021. The EPA has adopted regulations under existing provisions of the Clean Air Act that, among other things, establish Prevention of Significant Deterioration (the “PSD”), construction and Title V operating permit reviews for certain large stationary sources.  Facilities required to obtain PSD permits for their greenhouse gas emissions also will be required to meet “best available control technology” standards that will be established on a case-by-case basis.  The EPA also has adopted rules requiring the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from specified onshore and offshore natural gas and oil production sources in the United States on an annual basis, which include certain of our operations.

Although Congress from time to time has considered legislation to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, there has not been significant activity in the form of adopted legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the federal level in recent years.  In the absence of such federal climate legislation, a number of states, including states in which we operate, have enacted or passed measures to track and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, primarily through the planned development of greenhouse gas emission inventories and regional greenhouse gas cap-and-trade programs.  Most of these cap-and-trade programs require major sources of emissions or major producers of fuels to acquire and surrender emission allowances, with the number of allowances available for purchase reduced each year until the overall greenhouse gas emission reduction goal is achieved.  These reductions may cause the cost of allowances to escalate significantly over time. We will be further subject to our regulatory efforts such as California announced goal of eliminating the sale of vehicles which use gas by 2035. Automobile manufacturers are beginning to announce that they will only manufacture electric vehicles in the future.

Additionally, the United States rejoined, effective February 19, 2021, the non-binding international treaty to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions (the “Paris Agreement”), adopted by over 190 countries in December 2015.  The Paris Agreement entered into force in November 2016 after more than 70 nations, including the United States, ratified or otherwise indicated their intent to be bound by the agreement. The United States had previously withdrawn from the Paris Agreement effective November 4, 2020. Following the United States rejoining the Paris Agreement, President Biden announced in April 2021 the United States’ pledge to achieve an approximately 50% reduction from 2005 levels in “economy-wide” net greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. To the extent that the United States implements this agreement or imposes other climate change regulations on the oil and natural gas industry, or that investors insist on compliance regardless of legal requirements, it could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and future growth. In February 2021, the Acting Chair of the SEC issued a statement directing the Division of Corporation Finance to enhance its focus on climate-related disclosure in public company filings and in March 2021 the SEC announced the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force in the Division of Enforcement.


The adoption and implementation of these and other similar regulations could require us to incur material costs to monitor and report on greenhouse gas emissions or install new equipment to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases associated with our operations.  In addition, these regulatory initiatives could drive down demand for our products and services in the oil and gas industry by stimulating demand for alternative forms of energy that do not rely on combustion of fossil fuels that serve as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations, and consolidated financial condition.

Federal, state, and local legislative and regulatory initiatives in the United States relating to hydraulic fracturing or fracking could result in decreased demand for our transportation services, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Although we do not rely on hydraulic fracturing or fracking techniques in our exploration and production operations, our transportation business, which accounted for approximately 79% of our operating revenue in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, depends to a considerable extent on a continued use of such techniques. We expect to continue to derive a substantial portion of our revenue from our transportation operations for the foreseeable future.

In the United States, hydraulic fracturing is currently generally exempt from regulation under the Underground Injection Control program established under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, and is typically regulated by state oil and gas commissions or similar agencies. From time to time, the U.S. Congress has considered adopting legislation intended to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the additives used in the hydraulic-fracturing process. In addition, certain states have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations that could impose new or more stringent permitting, disclosure, disposal and well-construction requirements on hydraulic-fracturing operations. The adoption of any federal, state or local laws or the implementation of regulations regarding hydraulic fracturing could cause a decrease in the completion of new oil and gas wells and an associated decrease in demand for our transportation services, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Our operating results fluctuate due to the effect of seasonality in the oil and gas industry.

Operating levels of the oil industry have historically been lower in the winter months because of adverse weather conditions. Accordingly, our revenue generally follows a seasonal pattern. Revenue can also be affected by other adverse weather conditions, holidays and the number of business days during a given period because revenue is directly related to the available working days. From time to time, we may also suffer short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, earthquakes, and explosions that could harm our results of operations or make our results of operations more volatile.

We may be subject to various claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, and increases in the amount or severity of these claims and lawsuits could adversely affect us.

We are exposed to various claims and litigation related to commercial disputes, personal injury, property damage, environmental liability and other matters. Proceedings include claims by third parties, and certain proceedings have been certified or purport to be class actions. Developments in regulatory, legislative or judicial standards, material changes to litigation trends, or a catastrophic accident or series of accidents, involving any or all of property damage, personal injury, and environmental liability could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.

The extension of our active oil and gas mineral leases may be subject to performing continuous drilling operations.

Our oil and gas mineral leases may contain acreage that is either held by production or not. In order to extend the leased acreage not held by production, the Company must maintain minimum continuous drilling operations in order to extend these leases to future periods. The Company’s inability to perform operations during any given period could result in the Company’s losing the rights to future operations on that lease.


The potential lack of availability of, or cost of, drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and crude oil field services could adversely affect our ability to execute on a timely basis our exploration and development plans within our budget.

When the prices of crude oil increase, or the demand for equipment and services is greater than the supply in certain areas, we could encounter an increase in the cost of securing drilling rigs, equipment and supplies. In addition, larger producers may be more likely to secure access to such equipment by offering more lucrative terms. If we are unable to acquire access to such resources, or can obtain access only at higher prices, our ability to convert our reserves into cash flow could be delayed and the cost of producing those reserves could increase significantly, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our exploration and production and transportation operations are subject to stringent environmental, oil and gas-related and occupational safety and health laws and regulations, and noncompliance with such laws and regulations could expose us to material costs and liabilities.

Our exploration and production operations are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the drilling activities, production rates, the size and shape of drilling and spacing units or proration units, the transportation and sale of crude oil, gas, and the discharging of materials into the environment and environmental protection. These laws and regulations may limit the amount of oil and gas we can produce or limit the number of wells or the locations where we can drill.

Further, we are required to obtain and maintain numerous environmental and oil and gas-related permits, approvals and certificates from various federal, state and local governmental agencies in connection with our exploration and production operations, and may incur substantial costs in doing so. The need to obtain permits could potentially delay, curtail or cease the development of oil and gas projects. The Company may in the future be charged royalties on gas emissions or required to incur certain capital expenditures for air pollution control equipment or other air emissions-related issues. Additionally, our operations are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including the federal occupational safety and health and comparable state statutes, aimed at protecting the health and safety of employees.

We are also subject to various environmental laws and regulations dealing with the hauling and handling of hazardous materials, air emissions from our vehicles and facilities, and engine idling and discharge. Our transportation operations often involve traveling on unpaved roads located in rural areas, increasing the risk of accidents, and our staging pads often are located in areas where groundwater or other forms of environmental contamination could occur. Our operations involve the risks of environmental damage and hazardous waste disposal, among others. If we are involved in an accident involving hazardous substances, if there are releases of hazardous substances we transport, if soil or groundwater contamination is found at our facilities or results from our operations, or if we are found to be in violation of applicable environmental laws or regulations, we could owe cleanup costs and incur related liabilities, including substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may subject the Company to sanctions, including administrative, civil or criminal penalties, remedial cleanups or corrective actions, delays in permitting or performance of projects, natural resource damages and other liabilities. In addition, these laws and regulations may be amended and additional patent applications are currently pending.laws and regulations may be adopted in the future with more stringent legal requirements.

 

Because oil prices are highly volatile, any sustained decline in oil prices could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our capital expenditure obligations and financial commitments.

Our future revenues from exploration and production operations, profitability, cash flows, future growth and carrying value of our oil and gas properties will depend on oil prices. Commodity prices, including oil, are highly volatile and may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand and market uncertainty. Additional informationfactors which may affect oil prices and which are beyond our control include but are not limited to, the following factors:

worldwide and regional economic conditions impacting the global supply of and demand for oil, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;


the price and quantity of foreign imports of oil;

consumer and business demand;

political and economic conditions in or affecting other producing regions or countries, including the Middle East, Africa, South America and Russia;

actions of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, its members and other state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and production controls;

the level of global exploration, development and production;

the level of global inventories;

prevailing prices on local price indexes in the area in which we operate;

the proximity, capacity, cost and availability of gathering and transportation facilities;

localized and global supply and demand fundamentals and transportation availability;

the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and transporting reserves;

weather conditions and other natural disasters;

technological advances affecting energy consumption;

the price and availability of alternative fuels;

government regulations, such as regulation of natural gas transportation and price controls;

U.S. federal, state and local and non-U.S. governmental regulation and taxes; and

market perceptions of future prices, whether due to the foregoing factors or others.

While lower oil prices are helpful to our transportation business since it reduces our costs, it has an inverse effect on our exploration and production business. Lower commodity prices may reduce our cash flows and borrowing ability. If we are unable to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms, our ability to develop future reserves could be adversely affected. Also, using lower prices in estimating proved reserves may result in a reduction in proved reserve volumes due to economic limits.

If we are required to curtail our drilling program, we may be unable to continue to hold leases that are scheduled to expire, which may further reduce our reserves. As a result, a substantial or extended decline in commodity prices may materially and adversely affect our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to finance planned capital expenditures.

Conservation measures and technological advances could reduce demand for oil and natural gas.

Fuel conservation measures, alternative requirements, future legislation and regulation increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil, and natural gas, technological advances in fuel economy and energy generation devices could reduce demand for oil. The impact of the changing demand for oil may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


We may be required to record significant non-cash impairment charges related to a reduction in the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

We will perform assessments of our oil and gas properties whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. In order to perform these assessments, management will use various observable and unobservable inputs, including management’s outlooks for (i) proved reserves and risk-adjusted probable and possible reserves, (ii) commodity prices, (iii) production costs, (iv) capital expenditures and (v) production. Significant or extended price declines could result in the need to adjust the carrying value of our proved oil and gas properties by recording non-cash impairment charges. To the extent such assessments indicate a reduction of the estimated useful life or estimated future cash flows, the carrying value of the oil and gas properties may not be recoverable and therefore we may be required to record an impairment charge reducing the carrying value of the proved properties to their fair value. If oil and natural gas prices decline in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges related to the oil and gas properties acquired as part of the Banner Acquisition, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations in the period incurred.

Our future revenue will depend upon the size of the markets which we target and our ability to achieve continuous and sufficient market acceptance.

Even if we enter all necessary agreements with key customers in the oil industry and purchase enough equipment to satisfy the demand for freight services in the market, our future revenue will depend upon the size of the markets which we target and our ability to achieve continuous and sufficient market acceptance, and such factors as pricing, reimbursement from third-party payors and adequate market share for our services at the target markets.

We anticipate that the Banner Midstream expenses will increase substantially if and as they:

continue the research of the market and potential private companies to acquire;
expand the scope of our operations in the Territory;
establish a supply-demand chain and a respective trucking infrastructure to commercialize our market opportunities;
acquire existing businesses and revitalize their operations with the Companies framework;
seek to maintain, protect, and expand the Territory;
seek to attract and retain skilled personnel; and
create additional infrastructure to support our operations as a public company and plan future commercialization efforts.

We may not be able to successfully identify acquisition targets and complete strategic acquisitions to execute our growth strategy, and even if we are able to do so, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions.

As part of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue opportunities to acquire companies or assets that will enable us to expand our product and service offerings and to increase our geographic footprint. We routinely review potential acquisitions. However, identifying suitable acquisition targets can be difficult, costly and time-consuming, and we may not be able to do so or complete acquisitions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis or at all. Even if completed, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions. Our acquisitions have previously required, and any similar future transactions may also require, significant efforts and expenditures, in particular with respect to integration of acquired assets and business into our legacy operations. We may encounter unexpected difficulties, or incur unexpected costs, in connection with strategic acquisitions and integration efforts, including without limitation:

difficulties in the post-acquisition integration of operations and systems;


the termination of relationships with key personnel and customers of the acquired company;
a failure to add additional employees to manage the increased volume of business;
additional post acquisition challenges and complexities in areas such as tax planning, treasury management, financial reporting and legal compliance;

risks and liabilities from our acquisitions, some of which may not be discovered during the pre-acquisition due diligence process;
a disruption of our ongoing business or an inability of our ongoing business to receive sufficient management attention; and
a failure to realize the cost savings or other financial benefits we anticipated prior to acquisition.

Failure to successfully identify suitable acquisition targets, complete strategic acquisitions, or realize the anticipated benefits of completed acquisitions, would undermine our ability to execute on our growth strategy, which would in turn have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and future prospects.

Because we have limited experience operating our oil and gas exploration and transportation businesses, our failure to effectively manage the risks and challenges inherent in such businesses could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and growth prospects.

Until we acquired Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020, we had no experience in operating its oil and gas businesses. Although Jay Puchir, Banner Midstream’s Chief Executive Officer joined us initially as our Chief Accounting Officer and then Treasurer and has continued to run the oil and gas businesses following the Banner Midstream acquisition, and Julia Olguin was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of White River Holdings Corp (“White River”), our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, we have limited experience operating these businesses, and, as a result, may encounter challenges and risks inherent in operating such businesses. If we fail to effectively manage the risks and challenges inherent in such businesses, our business, operating results, financial condition and growth prospects would be materially and adversely affected.


Our transportation business is affected by industry-wide economic factors that are largely outside our control.

With the exception of minimal revenue from our investment advisory business, our revenue is from customers in the oil exploration and production industry. As such, our volumes are largely dependent on the economy and our results may be more susceptible to trends in unemployment and how it affects oil prices than carriers that do not have this focus. We believe that some of the most significant factors beyond our control that may negatively impact our operating results are economic changes that affect supply and demand in transportation markets.

The risks associated with these factors are heightened when the United States economy is weakened. Some of the principal risks during such times are as follows:

low overall demand levels, which may impair our asset utilization;

customers with credit issues and cash flow problems we are not currently aware of;

customers bidding out our services or selecting competitors that offer lower rates, in an attempt to lower their costs, forcing us to lower our rates or lose revenue; and

more unbilled miles incurred to obtain loads.

Economic conditions that decrease shipping demand or increase the supply of capacity in the trucking transportation industry on the Territory can exert downward pressure on rates and equipment utilization, thereby decreasing asset productivity. Declining freight levels and rates, a prolonged recession or general economic instability could result in declines in our results of operations, which declines may be material.

We also are subject to cost increases outside our control that could materially reduce our profitability if we are unable to increase our rates sufficiently. Such cost increases include, but are not limited to, fuel and energy prices, driver wages, taxes and interest rates, tolls, license and registration fees, insurance premiums, regulations, revenue equipment and related maintenance costs and healthcare and other benefits for our associates. We cannot predict whether, or in what form, any such cost increase or event could occur. Any such cost increase or event could adversely affect our profitability.

In addition, events outside our control, such as strikes or other work stoppages at our facilities or at customer, port, border or other shipping locations, weather, actual or threatened armed conflicts or terrorist attacks, efforts to combat terrorism, military action against a foreign state or group located in a foreign state or heightened security requirements could lead to reduced economic demand, reduced availability of credit or temporary closing of shipping locations or United States borders. Such events or enhanced security measures in connection with such events could impair our operations and result in higher operating costs.

Fluctuations in the price or availability of fuel, the volume and terms of diesel fuel purchase commitments and surcharge collection may increase our costs related to our transportation operations, which could materially and adversely affect our margins.

Fuel represents a significant expense for our transportation business while the sale of oil and to a lesser extent natural gas provides revenues for our business. Diesel fuel prices fluctuate greatly due to factors beyond our control, such as political events, terrorist activities, armed conflicts, depreciation of the dollar against other currencies and weather, such as hurricanes, and other natural or man-made disasters, each of which may lead to an increase in the cost of fuel. Fuel prices also are affected by the rising demand in developing countries and could be adversely impacted by diminished drilling activity and by the use of crude oil and oil reserves for other purposes. Such events may lead not only to increases in fuel prices, but also to fuel shortages and disruptions in the fuel supply chain. Because our operations are dependent upon diesel fuel, and a portion of our business is based on fuel purchased on the spot market at prevailing market rates, significant diesel fuel cost increases, shortages or supply disruptions could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.


Increases in fuel costs, to the extent not offset by rate per mile increases or fuel surcharges, have an adverse effect on our operations and profitability. While a portion of our fuel costs are covered by pass-through provisions in customer contracts and compensatory fuel surcharge programs, we also incur fuel costs that cannot be recovered even with respect to customers with which we maintain fuel surcharge programs, such as those associated with unbilled miles, or the time when our engines are idling. Because our fuel surcharge recovery lags behind changes in fuel prices, our fuel surcharge recovery may not capture the increased costs we pay for fuel, especially when prices are rising, leading to fluctuations in our levels of reimbursement. Further, during periods of low freight volumes, shippers can use their negotiating leverage to impose less compensatory fuel surcharge policies. In addition, the terms of each customer’s fuel surcharge agreement vary, and customers may seek to modify the terms of their fuel surcharge agreements to minimize recoverability for fuel price increases. Such fuel surcharges may not be maintained indefinitely or may not be sufficiently effective. As of the date of this prospectus, we had no derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to fuel price fluctuations.

If we fail to retain and attract qualified drivers, including owner-operators, it could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In our transportation operations, we rely almost exclusively on the fleet of vehicles owned and operated by independent contractors. These independent contractors are responsible for maintaining and operating their own equipment and paying their own fuel, insurance, licenses and other operating costs. Due to high turnover rates, the pool of qualified independent contractor drivers is often limited, which increases competition for their services, especially during times of increased economic activity. We currently face and may in the future continue to face from time- to-time, difficulty in attracting and retaining sufficient number of qualified independent contractor drivers. Additionally, our agreements with independent contractor drivers are terminable by either party without penalty and upon short notice. Our specialty equipment services targeting servicing oil exploration and oil development industries require special training to handle unique operating requirements. We may be legally obligated or otherwise subjected by the industry standards to use physical function tests and hair follicle and urine testing to screen and test all driver applicants, which we believe is a rigorous standard and could decrease the pool of qualified applicants available to us. If we are unable to retain our existing independent contractor drivers or recruit new qualified independent contractor drivers, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

The rates we offer our independent contractor drivers are subject to market conditions. Accordingly, we may be required to increase owner-operator compensation or take other measures to retain existing and attract new qualified independent contractor drivers. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain a sufficient number of independent contractor drivers, we could be required to increase our mileage rates and accessorial pay or operate with fewer trucks and face difficulty meeting our clients’ demands, which would in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

If owner-operators and their drivers that we rely upon in our transportation business were to be classified as employees instead of independent contractors, our business would be materially and adversely affected.

A number of companies in the logistics industry have been faced with legislation that requires that many independent contractors be treated as employees and receive benefits only available to employees which increases costs. To date, this legislation has been limited to California and is being considered in states where we do not operate. Some companies recently been involved in lawsuits, including class actions, and state tax and other administrative proceedings that claim that owner-operators or their drivers should be treated as employees, rather than independent contractors. These lawsuits and proceedings involve substantial monetary damages (including claims for unpaid wages, overtime, failure to provide meal and rest periods, unreimbursed business expenses and other items), injunctive relief, or both. While we believe that owner-operators and their drivers are properly classified as independent contractors rather than as employees, if their independent contractor status is challenged, we may not be successful in defending against such challenges in some or all jurisdictions in which we offer transportation services. We also may encounter a risk if the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) were to pass a rule to this effect, which could occur under the Boden administration. Furthermore, the costs associated with defending or resolving lawsuits relating to the independent contractor status of owner-operators and their drivers could be material to our business.


If legislation is passed in states where we operate, the NLRB passes a rule, or a court or an administrative agency were to determine that owner-operators and their drivers must be classified as employees rather than independent contractors, we could become subject to additional regulatory requirements, including but not limited to tax, wages, and wage and hour laws and requirements (such as those pertaining to minimum wage and overtime); employee benefits, social security, workers’ compensation and unemployment; discrimination, harassment, and retaliation under civil rights laws; claims under laws pertaining to unionizing, collective bargaining, and other concerted activity; and other laws and regulations applicable to employers and employees. Compliance with such laws and regulations would require us to incur significant additional expenses, potentially including without limitation, expenses associated with the application of wage and hour laws (including minimum wage, overtime, and meal and rest period requirements), employee benefits, social security contributions, taxes, and penalties. Additionally, any such reclassification would require us to change our business model, and consequently have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Similar to many companies, we have experienced a spike in our insurance costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Insurance premiums have recently escalated, and we are facing a similar increase in our insurance costs. Our future insurance and claims expense might exceed historical levels, which could reduce our earnings. We self-insure or maintain a high deductible for a portion of our claims exposure resulting from workers’ compensation, auto liability, general liability, cargo and property damage claims, as well as associate health insurance. Estimating the number and severity of claims, as well as related judgment or settlement amounts is inherently difficult. This, along with legal expenses, incurred but not reported claims and other uncertainties can cause unfavorable differences between actual claim costs and our reserve estimates. We plan to reserve for anticipated losses and expenses and periodically evaluate and adjust our claims reserves to reflect our experience. However, ultimate results may differ from our estimates, which could result in losses over our reserved amounts.

We maintain insurance with licensed insurance carriers above the amounts which we retain. Although we believe our aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, the amount of one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. If any claim were to exceed our coverage, we would be required to bear the excess, in addition to our other self-insured/retained amounts. As a result, our insurance and claims expense could increase, or we could raise our self-insured retention or deductible when our policies are renewed or replaced. Our operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if (i) cost per claim, premiums, or the number of claims significantly exceed our estimates, (ii) there is one or more claims in excess of our coverage limits, (iii) our insurance carriers refuse to pay our insurance claims or (iv) we experience a claim for which coverage is not provided.

Risks Factors Relating to Our Technology Solutions

Our ability to execute our strategy with respect to our technology segment, depends to a large extent on the outcome of the litigation related to protection of our intellectual property rights.

As previously disclosed, in April 2021, a federal jury found in our favor on three claims and awarded us damages in the amount of $115 million in the lawsuit against Walmart Inc. Specifically, the jury found that Walmart misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. We had filed the complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, in August 2018. The complaint included claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 27, 2021, we filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Central Division a motion for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $46 million or alternatively, $13,537,000, pre-judgment interest in the amount of $16,701,000 and 0.06% post-judgment interest, accruing from April 13, 2021.


Additionally, we expect to file an appeal arguing among other things, that we should have an opportunity to prove the full extent of our damages. We expect that Walmart will appeal the jury verdict and any award of attorneys’ fees. Intellectual property and similar litigation is subject to uncertainty. There is no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts related to this lawsuit or if we are, which amounts we will be able to recover.

If we are unable to develop and generate additional demand for our technology services or products, we will likely suffer serious harm to our business.

We have invested significant resources in developing and marketing our technology services and products. Some of our services and products are often considered complex and involve a new approach to the conduct of business by our customers. As a result, intensive marketing and sales efforts may be necessary to educate prospective customers regarding the uses and benefits of our services and products in order to generate additional demand. The market for our services and products may weaken, competitors may develop superior offerings, or we may fail to develop acceptable solutions to address new market conditions. Any one of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

Undetected errors or failures in our software, products or services could result in loss or delay in the market acceptance for our products or lost sales.

Because our software services and products, and the environments in which they operate, are complex, our software and products may contain errors that can be detected at any point in its lifecycle. While we continually test our services and products for errors, errors may be found at any time in the future. Detection of any significant errors may result in, among other things, loss of, or delay in, market acceptance and sales of our services and products, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation, increased service and warranty costs, license terminations or renegotiations or costly litigation. Additionally, because our services and products support or rely on other systems and applications, any software or hardware errors or defects in these systems or applications may result in errors in the performance of our service or products, and it may be difficult or impossible to determine where the error resides.

Sales to many of our target customers involve long sales and implementation cycles, which may cause revenues and operating results to vary significantly.

A prospective customer’s decision to purchase our services or products may often involve lengthy evaluation and product qualification processes. Throughout the sales cycle, we anticipate often spending considerable time educating and providing information to prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of our services and products. Budget constraints and the need for multiple approvals within these organizations may also delay the purchase decision. Failure to obtain the timely required approval for a particular project or purchase decision may delay the purchase of our services or products. As a result, we expect that the sales cycle for some of our services and products will typically range to more than 360 days, depending on the availability of funding to the prospective customer. These long cycles may cause delays in any potential sale, and we may spend a large amount of time and resources on prospective customers who decide not to purchase our services or products, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

Additionally, some of our services and products are designed for corporate customers, which will require us to recruit a sales force that understands the needs of these customers, engage in extensive negotiations and provide support to complete sales. If we do not successfully market our services and products to these targeted customers, our operating results will be below our expectations and the expectations of investors and market analysts, which would likely cause the price of our Common Stock to decline.


Patents, trademarks, copyrights and licenses are important to our technology business, and the inability to defend, obtain or renew such intellectual property could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

Through Zest Labs, the Company currently holds rights to patents and copyrights relating to certain aspects of its RFID technology, software, and services. In addition, the Company has registered, and/or has applied to register trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries for “Intelleflex,” the Intelleflex logo, “Zest,” “Zest Data Services”, the Zest logo, and numerous other trademarks and service marks. Although the Company believes the ownership of such patents, copyrights, trademarks and service marks is discussedan important factor in its business and that its success does depend in part on the ownership thereof, the Company relies primarily on the innovative skills, technical competence, and marketing abilities of its personnel.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to include intellectual property obtained from third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods, the Company believes, based upon past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms; however, there is no guarantee that such licenses could be obtained at all. Loss of a significant number of licenses may have an adverse effect of the Company’s operations.

The Company relies on licenses to third-party patents and intellectual property, and the Company’s future results could be materially adversely affected if it is alleged or found to have infringed intellectual property rights.

Many of Zest Labs’ products are designed to use third-party intellectual property, and it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of its products and business methods. Although the Company believes that, based on past experience and industry practice, such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms, there is no assurance that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable terms or at all.

If we fail to protect our proprietary information and prevent third parties from making unauthorized use of our products and technology, our financial results could be harmed.

Much of our software and underlying technology is proprietary. We seek to protect our proprietary rights through a combination of confidentiality agreements and through copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws. However, all of these measures afford only limited protection and may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented by third parties. Any patent licensed by us or issued to us could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or rights granted thereunder may not provide a competitive advantage to us. Furthermore, patent applications that we file may not result in issuance of a patent or, if a patent is issued, the patent may not be issued in a form that is advantageous to us. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights, others may independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around our patents and other rights. In addition, it is difficult to monitor compliance with, and enforce, our intellectual property in a cost-effective manner.

Third parties claiming that we infringe on their proprietary rights could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and prevent us from selling our products and services.

From time to time, third parties may claim that we have infringed on their intellectual property rights, including claims regarding patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Because of constant technological change in the markets in which we compete, the extensive patent coverage of existing technologies, and the rapid rate of issuance of new patents, it is possible that the number of these claims may grow. In addition, former employers of our former, current, or future employees may assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosed to us the confidential or proprietary information of these former employers. Any such claim, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation and distract management from day-to-day operations. If we are not successful in defending such claims, we could be required to stop selling, delay shipments of, or redesign our products, pay significant amounts as monetary damages, enter into royalty or licensing arrangements, or satisfy indemnification obligations that we have with some of our customers. Royalty or licensing arrangements that we may seek in such circumstances may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all. We may incur significant expenditures to investigate, defend and settle claims related to the use of technology and intellectual property rights as part of our strategy to manage this risk.


We rely on third-party manufacturers for the final assembly of certain of our product related to our technology offerings. If these third-party manufacturers were to become unavailable, we may not be able to replace them on economical terms or at all, and our business would be harmed.

A failure by such manufacturers to provide manufacturing services to us, or any disruption in such manufacturing services, may adversely affect our business. We may incur increased business disruption risk due to the dependence on these third-party manufacturers, as we are not able to exercise direct control over the assembly or related operations of certain of our products. If these third-party manufacturers experience financial difficulties or fail to meet our manufacturing needs, then we may be unable to satisfy customer product demands, lose sales, and be unable to maintain customer relationships. Longer production lead times may result in shortages of certain products and inadequate inventories during periods of unanticipated higher demand. Without such third parties continuing to manufacture our products, we may have no other means of final assembly of certain of our products until we are able to secure the manufacturing capability at another facility or develop an alternative manufacturing facility. This transition could be costly and time consuming.

The Company is subject to risks associated with laws, regulations and industry-imposed standards related to wireless communications devices.

Laws and regulations related to wireless communications devices in the many jurisdictions in which Zest Labs operates and seeks to operate are extensive and subject to change. Such changes, which could include but are not limited to restrictions on production, manufacture, distribution, and use of the device, may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

Wireless communication devices, such as RFID readers, are subject to certification and regulation by governmental and standardization bodies. These certification processes are extensive and time consuming, and could result in additional testing requirements, product modifications or delays in product shipment dates, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

Because of technological changes in the business software, web and device applications, sensors and sensor-based devices, and RFID and wireless communication industries, current extensive patent coverage, and the rapid issuance of new patents, it is possible that certain components of Zest Labs’ products and business methods may unknowingly infringe the patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. From time to time, Zest Labs may be notified that it may be infringing such rights. Responding to such claims, regardless of their merit, can consume significant time and expense. In certain cases, the Company may consider the desirability of entering into licensing agreements, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur. If there is a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting the Company from marketing or selling certain products or a successful claim of infringement against the Company requires it to pay royalties to a third party, the Company’s financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

The inability to obtain certain components could adversely impact the Company’s ability to deliver on its contractual commitments which could negatively impact our results of operations and cash flows.

Although most components essential to the Company’s business are generally available from multiple sources, certain key components including, but not limited to, microprocessors, enclosures, certain RFID custom integrated circuits, and application-specific integrated circuits are currently obtained by the Company from single or limited sources. Some key components, while currently available to the Company from multiple sources, are at times subject to industry-wide availability constraints and pricing pressures. If the supply of a key or single-sourced component to the Company were to be delayed or curtailed or in the event a key manufacturing vendor delayed shipment of completed products to the Company, the Company’s ability to ship related products in desired quantities, and in a timely manner, could be adversely affected. The Company’s business and financial performance could also be adversely affected depending on the time required to obtain sufficient quantities from the original source, or to identify and obtain sufficient quantities from an alternative source. Continued availability of these components may be affected if suppliers were to decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the Company’s requirements. The Company attempts to mitigate these potential risks by working closely with these and other key suppliers on product introduction plans, strategic inventories, coordinated product introductions, and internal and external manufacturing schedules and levels. Consistent with industry practice, the Company acquires components through a combination of formal purchase orders, supplier contracts, and open orders based on projected demand information. However, adverse changes in the supply chain of the Company’s vendors may adversely impact the supply of key components.

28

General Risks

Our future success depends on our ability to retain and attract high-quality personnel, and the efforts, abilities and continued service of our senior management.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain a number of highly skilled employees and on the service and performance of our senior management team and other key personnel, including service center managers. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key employees and inadequate succession planning could cause substantial disruption to our business operations, deplete our institutional knowledge base and erode our competitive advantage, which would adversely affect our business. Competition for qualified personnel possessing the skills necessary to implement our strategy is intense, and we may fail to attract or retain the employees necessary to execute our business model successfully. We do not have “key person” life insurance policies covering any of our executive officers, other than Peter Mehring, the president of Zest Labs.

Our success will depend to a significant degree upon the continued efforts of our key management, engineering and other personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. In particular, we believe that our future success is highly dependent on Randy May, our Chief Executive Officer, William Hoagland, our Chief Financial Officer, Jay Puchir, our Treasurer and CEO and President of Banner Midstream Corp., Peter Mehring, President of Zest Labs, and Julia Olguin, the Chief Executive Officer of White River. If any members of our management team leave our employment, our business could suffer, and the share price of our Common Stock could decline.

If we cannot manage our growth effectively, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

We have recently experienced significant growth commencing with and following the Banner Acquisition. Our business model relies on our rapidly growing our oil and gas drilling and transportation businesses. Businesses that grow rapidly often have difficulty managing their growth while maintaining their compliance and quality standards. If we continue to grow as rapidly as we anticipate, we will need to expand our management by recruiting and employing additional executive and key personnel capable of providing the necessary support. There can be no assurance that our management, along with our staff, will be able to effectively manage our growth. Our failure to meet the challenges associated with rapid growth could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which requires, among other things, that public companies maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.

Although our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2021, any failure to maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement in the future could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. If we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired, which could result in loss of investor confidence and could have an adverse effect on our stock price.


Failure of information technology systems or data security breaches, including as the result of cyber security attacks, affecting us, our business associates, or our industry, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

We depend on information technology systems and services in conducting our business. We and others in the industries in which we operate use these technologies for internal purposes, including data storage and processing, transmissions, as well as in our interactions with our business associates. Examples of these digital technologies include analytics, automation, and cloud services. If any of our financial, operational, or other data processing systems are compromised, fail or have other significant shortcomings, it could disrupt our business, require us to incur substantial additional expenses, result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results.

For example, the operator of the Colonial Pipeline was forced to pay $4.4 million in ransom to hackers as the result of a cyberattack disabling the pipeline for several days in May 2021. The attack also resulted in gasoline price increases and shortages across the East Coast of the United States. As we depend on the availability and price of gasoline in our transportation business, any significant increase in the price and/or shortage of gasoline would have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Because our Common Stock trades on the OTCQB, we are subject to the unwillingness of most institutional investors to purchase our Common Stock as well as the general limited liquidity of that trading market.

Our Common Stock is currently traded on the OTCQB, which is not a national securities exchange. Most institutional investors will only purchase securities which trade on one of the markets operated by the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock Exchange. As a result, the OTCQB is generally less liquid than the leading stock exchanges. While the market for our Common Stock has been relatively active, we believe our failure to be listed on a leading national securities exchange has reduced our liquidity. We cannot assure you that our recent liquidity will be maintained or that investors will not encounter difficulties in selling their Common Stock in the future at present levels or if the absence of sufficient liquidity will harm our stockholders in the future.

Future sales of our Common Stock in the public market could lower the price of our Common Stock and impair our ability to raise funds in future securities offerings.

Of 22,820,573 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 15, 2021, approximately 17,832,456 shares are held by investors who are not our affiliates or holders of restricted stock. All of these shares of unrestricted stock are freely tradeable. The remaining shares may be sold subject to the volume limits of Rule 144 which limits sales by any affiliate to 1% of outstanding shares in any three-month period. Future sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the then prevailing market price of our Common Stock and could make it more difficult for us to raise funds in the future through an offering of our securities.

The price of our Common Stock is subject to volatility, including for reasons unrelated to our operating performance, which could lead to losses by investors and costly securities litigation.

The trading price of our Common Stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate in response to a number of factors, some of which may be outside our control, including but not limited to, the following factors:

any announcements relating to our pending Walmart litigation;

actual or anticipated variations in our operating results;

Developments relating to the Walmart litigation;

changes in market valuations of companies in the oil and gas industry;

announcements of developments by us or our competitors;

future oil prices;


announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, capital commitments, significant contracts, or other material developments that may affect our prospects;

the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic and shutdowns in the Territory;

adoption of new accounting standards affecting our industry;

additions or departures of key personnel;

sales of our Common Stock or other securities in the open market; and

other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

The stock market is subject to significant price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against such a company. Litigation initiated against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and Company resources, which could harm our business and financial condition.

Future changes in the fair value of outstanding warrants could result in volatility of our reported results of operations.

Because of the derivative liability caused by our outstanding warrants, the increase or decrease in our Common Stock price each quarter (measured from the first day to the last day) is either a non-cash expense or income. If the price rises as it did in the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2021, we are required to report the expense, which increases our actual operating loss. Contrarily a price decrease in a given quarter will cause us to report income. This could cause our reporting results to fluctuate otherwise as the result of our performance, which would increase volatility in our stock price.

We have recently experienced fluctuations in the market price of our Common Stock and if it again becomes subject to the “penny stock” rules, brokers will not generally solicit the purchase of our Common Stock, which would adversely affect the liquidity and market price of our Common Stock.

We have recently experienced wide fluctuations in the price of our Common Stock. For example, our stock price decreased from approximately $12.00 per share in early April 2021 to approximately $3.25 in mid-May 2021, resulting in our Common Stock to be considered a “penny stock” under SEC rules. The SEC has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” as an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. Such exceptions include among others any equity security listed on a national securities exchange and any equity security issued by an issuer that has (i) net tangible assets of at least $2,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for three years, net tangible assets of at least $5,000,000, if such issuer has been in continuous operation for less than three years, or (iii) average annual revenue of at least $6,000,000 for the last three years. Although the market price of our Common Stock on OTCQB was $6.25 per share as of June 28, 2021, there is no assurance that our stock price will rise or stay above $5.00 per share. The “penny stock” designation requires any broker-dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. These rules limit the ability of broker-dealers to solicit purchases of our Common Stock and therefore reduce its liquidity.

Moreover, as a result of apparent regulatory pressure from the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, a growing number of broker-dealers decline to permit investors, or otherwise make it difficult, to purchase and sell “penny stocks.” The “penny stock” designation may have a depressive effect upon our Common Stock price.

Because we can issue “blank check” preferred stock without stockholder approval, it could adversely impact the rights of holders of our Common Stock.

Under our Articles of Incorporation our Board of Directors may approve an issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock without seeking stockholder approval. Any additional shares of preferred stock that we issue in the future may rank ahead of our Common Stock in terms of dividend or liquidation rights and may have greater voting rights than our Common Stock. In addition, such preferred stock may contain provisions allowing those shares to be converted into shares of Common Stock, which could dilute the value of Common Stock to current stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. In addition, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of our Company. Although we have no present intention to issue any additional shares of authorized preferred stock, there can be no assurance that we will not do so in the future.


The approval of the application to list our Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market was significantly delayed due to factors outside our control; because our stock price is below the required minimum bid price of $4, our listing application may not be approved in the near future or at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our stock price and liquidity.

Last year we applied to list our Common Stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”). In December 2020 we effected a one-for-five reverse split of the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Stock and conducted a registered offering of Common Stock and warrants, in each case to meet the Nasdaq quantitative initial listing requirements. Following the reverse split and the December 2020 capital raise we believe we continued to meet the Nasdaq initial listing standards until a decrease in our stock price mid-April 2021. As of the date of this Form 10-K our listing application remained pending.

At the time we effected the reverse stock split, we did not know that the approval of our listing application was being delayed by Nasdaq pending an inquiry by FINRA involving potential manipulation of our Common Stock. Since we never engaged in any investor relations activities, we always assumed any alleged manipulation did not involve Ecoark or its management. Nasdaq recently advised us that the FINRA inquiry will no longer prevent it from approving our listing application once we satisfy the $4 minimum bid price requirement.

Even if we meet the $4 bid price requirement, there is no assurance that our listing application will be approved in the near future or at all. We have no intention at this time to effect another reverse stock split. If our listing application is not approved, our Common Stock will continue to trade on the OTCQB, which would affect the liquidity and price of our Common Stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The Company does not own any real property. It currently leases office space in San Antonio, Texas. The current property lease is considered adequate for operations and this lease runs through November 2023. In addition a subsidiary leases space in Kilgore, Texas for a term of 42 months through September 30, 2022.

As of March 31, 2021, our acreage is comprised of approximately 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. We acquired certain oil and gas properties as part of the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020, and during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 continued to focus on expanding our exploration and production footprint and capabilities by acquiring real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases.


The Company had an analysis completed by an independent petroleum consulting company in March 2021 to complete the acquisition analysis within the required one-year period. The analysis required an asset allocation of the oil and gas reserves from the acquisitions noted above and also required the Company to impair certain reserves acquired.

Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

As of March 31, 2021 and 2020, all of our proved oil and natural gas reserves were located in the United States, in the States of Texas, Mississippi and Louisiana. The Company did not have any proved oil and natural gas reserves prior to the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

The following tables set forth summary information with respect to our proved reserves as of March 31, 2021 and 2020. For additional information see Supplemental Information “Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Unaudited)” to our consolidated financial statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Proved reserves as of March 31, 2021 (Numbers in thousands, except per barrel):

Reserve Category Crude Oil (Mbbl)  Natural Gas (MMcf)  Total Proved (BOE)(1) 
Proved Reserves         
Developed  463       -   463 
Developed Non-Producing  -   -   - 
Undeveloped  -   -   - 
             
Total Proved Reserves  463   -   463 
             
Estimated Future Net Cash Flows(2)         $10,570 
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows          (3,347)
             
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows – (PV10)(3)         $7,223 

(1)BOE (barrels of oil equivalent) is calculated by a ratio of 6 MCF to 1 BBL of oil
(2)Prices used for net cash flow are based on the 12 month average of the wti cushing price reference. an average benchmark of $40.01/bbl and average realized price of $38.54/bbl were analyzed with the realized price ultimately used in the cash flow analysis.
(3)PV10 represents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved oil and natural gas reserves discounted at 10%. pv-10 of our total year-end proved reserves is considered a non-us gaap financial measure as defined by the sec. we believe that presentation of the pv-10 is relevant and useful to our investors because it presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved reserves. we further believe investors and creditors use our pv-10 as a basis for comparison of the relative size and value of our reserves to other companies.


Proved reserves as of March 31, 2020 (Numbers in thousands, except per barrel):

Reserve Category Crude Oil (Mbbl)  Natural Gas (MMcf)  Total Proved (BOE)(1) 
Proved Reserves         
Developed  17         -   17 
Developed Non-Producing  -   -   - 
Undeveloped  -   -   - 
             
Total Proved Reserves  17   -   17 
             
Estimated Future Net Cash Flows(2)         $(128)
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows          40 
             
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows – (PV10)(3)         $(88)

(1)BOE (barrels of oil equivalent) is calculated by a ratio of 6 MCF to 1 BBL of oil
(2)Prices used for net cash flow are based on the 12 month average of the wti cushing price reference. an average benchmark of $55.77/bbl and average realized price of $45.91/bbl were analyzed with the realized price ultimately used in the cash flow analysis.
(3)PV10 represents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved oil and natural gas reserves discounted at 10%. pv-10 of our total year-end proved reserves is considered a non-us gaap financial measure as defined by the sec. we believe that presentation of the pv-10 is relevant and useful to our investors because it presents the discounted future net cash flows attributable to our proved reserves. we further believe investors and creditors use our pv-10 as a basis for comparison of the relative size and value of our reserves to other companies.


The following table presents certain information with respect to oil and natural gas production attributable to our interests in all of our properties in the United States, the reserve derived from the sale of such production, average sales price received and average production costs for the year ended March 31, 2021 and during the 4 day period after the Banner Midstream acquisition between March 28, 2020 and the fiscal year-end on March 31, 2020. Numbers in thousands except average barrel or production sales and costs.

  Units of Measure March 31,
2021
 
Production     
Oil Barrels  463 
Natural Gas Mcf  - 
BOE    463 
       
Sales      
Oil Barrels $16,657 
Natural Gas Mcf $- 
       
Average Sales Price      
Oil Barrels $38.54 
Natural Gas Mcf $- 
       
Production – Lease Operating Expenses   $6,089 
       
Average Cost of Production per BOE   $13.15 

Units of MeasureMarch 31,
2020
Production
OilBarrels    -
Natural GasMcf-
BOE-
Sales
OilBarrels$-
Natural GasMcf$-
Average Sales Price
OilBarrels$-
Natural GasMcf$-
Production – Lease Operating Expenses$-
Average Cost of Production per BOE$-

Drilling and other exploratory activities:

During the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company undertook a drilling program and pre-funded approximately $5,800,000 of the cost, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387,000 has been expensed as drilling costs. For the year ended March 31, 2020, the Company acquired Banner Midstream and all activities and properties owned by them at the time of acquisition. Other than some minor drilling in that four-day period of time that the Company owned Banner Midstream, no material activities occurred.

Present activities:

The Company is assessing all of its properties at the present time to determine any future drilling activities to commence.

Delivery commitments:

The Company is not currently committed to provide a fixed and determinable quantity of oil and gas in the near future under existing contracts or agreements.


Productive Wells

The following table sets forth the number of wells in our inventory, in which we maintained an operated ownership interest as of March 31, 2021.

Well Category: Oil  Gas 
       
Active Producer  29   - 
Inactive Producer  63   11 
Shut-In  2   1 
Plugged & Abandoned  1   - 
Active Salt Water Disposal (SWD)  19   - 
Inactive SWD  2   - 
         
   116   12 

The following table sets forth the number of wells in our inventory, in which we maintained ownership interests as of March 31, 2020.

Well Category: Oil  Gas 
       
Active Producer  9   - 
Inactive Producer  41   - 
Shut-In  3   1 
Plugged & Abandoned  1   - 
Active Salt Water Disposal (SWD)  1   - 
Inactive SWD  -   - 
         
   55   1 


Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are presently involved in the following legal proceedings in Arkansas and Florida. To the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of our properties or businesses are subject, which would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

On August 1, 2018, Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Zest Labs, Inc. filed a complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest a total of $115 million in damages which includes $65 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. liable on three claims. The federal jury found that Walmart Inc. misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. On April 27, 2021, we filed with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Central Division a motion for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $46,000,000 or alternatively, $13,536,803, pre-judgment interest in the amount of $16,700,548 and 0.06% post-judgment interest, accruing from April 13, 2021. 

On December 12, 2018, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in Sarasota County, Florida by certain investors who invested in the Company before it was public. The complaint alleges that the investment advisors who solicited the investors to invest into the Company made omissions and misrepresentations concerning the Company and the shares. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint which is pending. 

In the opinion of management, there are no other legal matters involving us that would have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted OTC Markets’ OTCQB tier under the sectionsymbol “ZEST”. Any over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

38

Holders

As of the date of this filing, we had approximately 169 holders of record of our common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of our transfer agent and does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of various security brokers, dealers, and registered clearing agencies. The transfer agent of our common stock is Philadelphia Stock Transfer, located at 2320 Haverford Road, Suite 230, Ardmore, Pennsylvania 19003.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. The payment of dividends on our common stock in the future will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, operating and financial condition and such other factors as our Board of Directors may consider appropriate.  

We currently expect to use all available funds to finance the future development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 other than those transactions previously reported to the SEC on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data [RESERVED]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations describes the principal factors affecting the results of our operations, financial condition, and changes in financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying audited financial statements, and notes thereto, included elsewhere in this report. The information contained in this discussion is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. We urge you to review carefully the sections of this report entitled “Business.Risk Factorsand “Forward-Looking Statements” for a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with an investment in our securities.

 

Dollar amounts and numbers of shares that follow in this Item 7 are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.

OVERVIEW

Ecoark Holdings is a diversified holding company, incorporated in the state of Nevada on November 19, 2007. Through Ecoark Holdings wholly owned subsidiaries, the Company has operations in three areas: (i) oil and gas, including exploration, production and drilling operations on over 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi and transportation services, (ii) post-harvest shelf-life and freshness food management technology, and (iii) financial services including investing in a select number of early stage startups. The Company’s subsidiaries include Banner Midstream, White River, Shamrock, Pinnacle Frac, Capstone, Zest Labs and Trend Holdings. 

Through Pinnacle Frac the Company provides transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations. Capstone procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors. These two operating subsidiaries of Banner Midstream are revenue producing entities.


Through White River and Shamrock, we are engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, and drilling operations on over 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

While the Company’s consolidated financial information for the fiscal ended March 31, 2021 reflects the operating results of Banner Midstream which currently comprises the Company’s exploration and production and transportation business, Banner Midstream’s operating results are not included in the Company’s consolidated financial information for the fiscal ended March 31, 2020. The operating results of Trend Holdings are included in the Company’s consolidated financial information beginning May 31, 2019.

Fiscal Year 2021 Highlights

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, the Company focused its efforts to a considerable extent on expanding its exploration and production footprint and capabilities by acquiring real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases.

On June 11, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SR Acquisition I, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of 262 total wells in Mississippi and Louisiana, approximately 9,000 acres of active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment. The 262 total wells include 57 active producing wells, 19 active disposal wells, 136 shut-in with future utility wells, and 50 shut-in pending plugging wells. Included in the assignment are 4 wells in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale formation.

On June 18, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SN TMS, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of wells, active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment.

On August 14, 2020, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, White River E&P LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company Rabb Resources, LTD. and Claude Rabb, the sole owner of Rabb Resources, LTD. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Rabb Resources, LTD. The acquired assets consisted of certain real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases. The Company in June 2020 previously provided for bridge financing to Rabb Resources, LTD under the $225 Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note. As consideration for entering into the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to pay Rabb Resources, LTD. A total of $3,500 consisting of (i) $1,500 in cash, net of $304 in outstanding amounts related to the note receivable and accrued interest receivable, and (ii) $2,000 payable in common stock of the Company, which based on the closing price of the common stock as of the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement equaled 103 shares. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the Rabb Resources, LTD historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

On September 4, 2020, White River SPV 3, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banner Midstream entered into an Agreement and Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease with a privately held limited liability company (the “Assignor”). Under the Lease Assignment, the Assignor assigned a 100% working interest (75% net revenue interest) in a certain oil and gas lease covering in excess of 1,600 acres (the “Lease”), and White River paid $1,500 in cash to the Assignor. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

On October 9, 2020, the Company and White River SPV, entered into a Participation Agreement (the “Participation Agreement”) by and among the Company, White River SPV, BlackBrush Oil & Gas, L.P. (“BlackBrush”) and GeoTerre, LLC, an unrelated privately-held limited liability company (the “Assignor”), to conduct drilling of wells in the Austin Chalk formation.

Pursuant to the Participation Agreement, the Company and White River SPV have agreed, among other things, to pre-fund a majority of the cost, approximately $5,800, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387 has been expensed as drilling costs. The Participation Agreement requires the estimated amount of the drilling costs that were paid into a designated escrow account by the commencement of drilling in January 2021. BlackBrush has agreed to assign to the other parties to the Participation Agreement, subject to certain exceptions and limitations specified therein, specified portions of its leasehold working interest in certain Austin Chalk formation units. The Participation Agreement provides for an initial allocation of the working interests and net revenue interests among the assignor, BlackBrush and the Company and then a re-allocation upon payout or payment of drilling and completion costs for each well drilled. Prior to payout, the Company will own 90% of the working interest and 67.5% of the net revenue interest in each well. Following payout, the Company will own 70% of working interest and 52.5% net revenue interest in each well.


The Parties to the Participation Agreement, except for the Company, had previously entered into a Joint Operating Agreement, dated September 4, 2020 (the “Operating Agreement”) establishing an area of mutual interest, including the Austin Chalk formation, and governing the parties’ rights and obligations with respect to drilling, completion and operation of wells therein. The Participation Agreement and the Operating Agreement require, among other things, that White River SPV and the Company drill and complete at least one horizontal Austin Chalk well with a certain minimum lateral each calendar year and/or maintain leasehold by paying its proportionate share of any rental payments.

On September 30, 2020, the Company and White River Energy, LLC (“White River Energy”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into three asset purchase agreements (the “Asset Purchase Agreements”) with privately-held limited liability companies to acquire working interests in the Harry O’Neal oil and gas mineral lease (the “O’Neal OGML”), the related well bore, crude oil inventory and equipment. Immediately prior to the acquisition, White River Energy owned an approximately 61% working interest in the O’Neal OGML oil well and a 100% working interest in any future wells.

The purchase prices of these leases were $126, $312 and $312, respectively, totaling $750. The consideration paid to the Sellers was in the form of 68 shares of common stock. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

In February and March 2021, the Company acquired additional leases for $916 under the Blackbrush/Deshotel lease related to the Participation Agreement.

Reverse Stock Split

Effective with the opening of trading on December 17, 2020, the Company implemented a one-for-five reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock and a simultaneous proportionate reduction of its authorized common stock. The reverse stock split was effected without obtaining stockholder approval as permitted by Nevada law, and the authorized common stock was proportionately reduced to 40,000 shares. All share and per share figures are reflected on a post-split basis herein.

Ratification of Authorized Capital Increase

At the special meeting held on December 29, 2020, the stockholders of the Company ratified the previously approved increase of the number of shares of common stock the Company is authorized to issue from 30,000 shares to 40,000 shares.

Authorized Capital Reduction

Effective December 29, 2020, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to reduce its authorized common stock from 40,000 to 30,000.

Registered Direct Offering of Common Stock and Warrants

On December 31, 2020, the Company completed a registered direct offering, whereby the Company issued 889 shares of common stock and 889 accompanying warrants to purchase common stock to one institutional investor under the effective Form S-3 at $9.00 per share and accompanying warrant for a total of $8,000 in gross proceeds, before placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The warrants are exercisable for a two-year term at a strike price of $10.00 per share. The Company granted 62 warrants to the placement agent as compensation in addition to the $560 cash commission received by the placement agent. The placement agent warrants are exercisable at $11.25 per share and expire on January 2, 2023.


Our principal executive offices are located at 303 Pearl Parkway, Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 78215, and our telephone number is (800) 762-7293. Our website address is http://ecoarkusa.com/. Our website and the information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in and are not considered part of this report.

Impact of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound effect on the U.S. and global economy and may continue to affect the economy and the industries in which we operate, depending on the vaccine rollouts and the emergence of virus mutations.

COVID-19 did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations or the Consolidated Balance Sheets included in this Form 10-K. However, it did have a material impact on our management’s ability to operate effectively. The impact included the difficulties of working remotely from home including slow Internet connection, the inability of our accounting and financial officers to collaborate as effectively as they would otherwise have in an office environment and issues arising from mandatory state quarantines.

While it is not possible at this time to estimate with sufficient certainty the continued impact that COVID-19 could have on the Company’s business, future outbreaks and the measures taken by federal, state, local and foreign governments could disrupt the operation of the Company’s business. The COVID-19 outbreak and mitigation measures have also had and may continue to have an adverse impact on global and domestic economic conditions, including reducing the demand for oil, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition, including on its potential to conduct financings on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. In addition, the Company has taken temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of the virus to its employees, including temporarily requiring employees to work remotely, and discouraging employee attendance at in-person work-related meetings, which could negatively affect the Company’s business. The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak impacts the Company’s results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severity of the virus and the actions to contain its impact.

The CARES Act includes, among other things, provisions relating to payroll tax credits and deferrals, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credits and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. The CARES Act also established a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), whereby certain small business are eligible for a loan to fund payroll expenses, rent and related costs. We had received funding under the PPP, and a majority of that as indicated in our Consolidated Statement of Operations has been forgiven.

Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions

 

In reading and understandingThe critical accounting policies listed below are those the Company’s discussionCompany deems most important to their operations.


Use of resultsEstimates

The preparation of operations, liquidity and capital resources, and the auditedconsolidated financial statements that follow, one should be aware of key policies, judgmentsin conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, but are importantnot limited to, management’s estimate of provisions required for uncollectible accounts receivable, fair value of assets held for sale and assets and liabilities acquired, impaired value of equipment and intangible assets, including goodwill, asset retirement obligations, estimates of discount rates in lease, liabilities to accrue, fair value of derivative liabilities associated with warrants, cost incurred in the satisfaction of performance obligations, permanent and temporary differences related to income taxes and determination of the fair value of stock awards.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The estimates of proved, probable and possible oil and gas reserves are used as significant inputs in determining the depletion of oil and gas properties and the impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proven, probable and possible reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. Similarly, evaluations for impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties are subject to numerous uncertainties including, among others, estimates of future recoverable reserves and commodity price outlooks. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions utilized.

Oil and Gas Properties

The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for its investment in oil and natural gas properties. Under the full cost method of accounting, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including directly related overhead costs are capitalized. General and administrative costs related to production and general overhead are expensed as incurred.

All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized on the unit of production method using estimates of proved reserves. Disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for as a reduction of capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized unless such adjustment would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in operations. Unproved properties and development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the loss from operations before income taxes and the adjusted carrying amount of the unproved properties is amortized on the unit-of-production method.

43

Limitation on Capitalized Costs

Under the full-cost method of accounting, we are required, at the end of each reporting period, to perform a test to determine the limit on the book value of our oil and gas properties (the “Ceiling” test). If the capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties, net of accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, exceed the Ceiling, the excess or impairment is charged to expense. The expense may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher oil and gas prices may subsequently increase the Ceiling. The Ceiling is defined as the sum of: (a) the present value, discounted at 10% and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions, of (1) estimated future gross revenues from proved reserves, which is computed using oil and gas prices determined as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month hedging arrangements pursuant to SAB 103, less (2) estimated future expenditures (based on current costs) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves; plus, (b) the cost of properties being amortized; plus, (c) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized; net of (d) the related tax effects related to the portrayaldifference between the book and tax basis of financial conditionsour oil and results.natural gas properties.

Oil and Gas Reserves

Reserve engineering is a subjective process that is dependent upon the quality of available data and interpretation thereof, including evaluations and extrapolations of well flow rates and reservoir pressure. Estimates by different engineers often vary sometimes significantly. In addition, physical factors such as results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of an estimate, as well as economic factors such as changes in product prices, may justify revision of such estimates. Because proved reserves are required to be estimated using recent prices of the evaluation, estimated reserve quantities can be significantly impacted by changes in product prices.

Inventories

Crude oil, products and merchandise inventories are carried at the lower of cost (last-in-first-out (LIFO)) or net realizable value. Inventory costs include expenditures and other charges directly and indirectly incurred in bringing the inventory to its existing condition and location.

Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation

Asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) primarily represent the estimated present value of the amount the Company will incur to plug, abandon and remediate its producing properties at the projected end of their productive lives, in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws. The Company’s continuing operations have not generated sufficient revenues and relatedCompany determined its ARO by calculating the present value of the estimated cash flows related to datethe obligation. The retirement obligation is recorded as a liability at its estimated present value as of the obligation’s inception, with an offsetting increase to fundproved properties or to exploration costs.

Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

The Company accounts for a contract when it has been approved and committed to, each party’s rights regarding the Company’s operations. That raises a question asgoods or services to whether we are a “going concern”. Because webe transferred have been successful at raising capitalidentified, the payment terms have been identified, the contract has commercial substance, and have a substantial credit facility in place, we assume that we will continue operationscollectability is probable. Revenue is generally recognized net of allowances for returns and thus have not used liquidation accounting which would assume that liquidation was imminent.any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.

 

Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the fair value for each of the elements.

Our revenues

Revenue from fiscal periods priorsoftware license agreements of Zest Labs is recognized over time or at a point in time depending on the evaluation of when the customer obtains control of the promised goods or services over the term of the agreement. For agreements where the software requires continuous updates to 2018provide the intended functionality, revenue is recognized over the term of the agreement. For software as a service (“SaaS”) contracts that include multiple performance obligations, including hardware, perpetual software licenses, subscriptions, term licenses, maintenance and other services, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on estimates of the price that would be charged to the customer for each promised product or service if it were generated principallysold on a standalone basis. For contracts for new products and services where standalone pricing has not been established, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on estimates using the adjusted market assessment approach, the expected cost plus a margin approach or the residual approach as appropriate under the circumstances. Contracts are typically on thirty-day payment terms from when the sale of hardware. InCompany satisfies the performance obligation in the contract. The Company did not have material revenue from software license agreements in the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 2018, revenues were principally2020, respectively.


Revenue under master service agreements is recorded upon the performance obligation being satisfied. Typically, the satisfaction of the performance obligation occurs upon the frac sand load being delivered to the customer site and this load being successfully invoiced and accepted by the Company’s factoring agent.

The Company recognizes revenue under ASC 606 when: (i) the Company receives notification of the successful sale of a load of crude oil to a buyer; (ii) the buyer will provide a price based on the average monthly price of crude oil in the most recent month; and (iii) cash is received the following month from the crude oil buyer.

The Company accounts for contract costs in accordance with ASC Topic 340-40, Contracts with Customers. The Company recognizes the cost of sales of a professional services projectcontract as expense when incurred or at the time a performance obligation is satisfied. The Company recognizes an asset from the costs to fulfil a contract only if the costs relate directly to a contract, the costs generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying a performance obligation in the future and more importantly from Software as a Service (“SaaS”) arrangements that we expectthe costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a principal sourcecontract are capitalized unless the costs would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract was obtained.

Cost of sales for Pinnacle Frac includes all direct expenses incurred to produce the revenue for the period. This includes, but is not limited to, direct employee labor, direct contract labor and fuel.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the future. We adopted a new accounting policyfollowing hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for revenue recognitionidentical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

45

Segment Information

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10 Segment Reporting. This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on April 1, 2017 that had no impact on historical reported results, and it positions us for what we expect our business to bethe manner in the future. It requires judgment to apply, but in plain English it recognizes revenue whenwhich management disaggregates the Company fulfillsin making internal operating decisions. The Company and its chief operating decision makers determined that the obligations it has committed to in agreementsCompany’s operations effective with customers. Judgment is also required to estimate the costs associated with those revenues. The transition from Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 605 to ASC 606, Revenue, was not material to our financial statements.

May 31, 2019, acquisition of Trend Holdings and the March 27, 2020 acquisition of Banner Midstream now consist of three segments, Trend Holdings (Finance), Banner Midstream (Commodities) and Zest Labs (Technology).

 

A significant percentageDerivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Management evaluates all of our operating expenses results from non-cash share-based compensation, which is typical of technology companies. Nearly two-thirds of fiscal 2019 operating expenses and more than one-third of fiscal 2018 operating expenses resulted from this share-based compensation. We have granted shares, options andthe Company’s financial instruments, including warrants, to employees, consultantsdetermine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. The Company generally uses a Black-Scholes model, as applicable, to value the derivative instruments at inception and investorssubsequent valuation dates when needed. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as incentives to generate success forliabilities or as equity, is remeasured at the Company insteadend of making cash payments.each reporting period. The accounting calculations for this type of compensation can be complex and are derived from models like the Black-Scholes option pricing model that requires judgment in making assumptions and developing estimates.

Weis used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate derivative liabilities associated with warrants issued in conjunction with capital raises. See additional discussion of those transactions in Notes 1 and 3 to the financial statements.

We have also invested heavily in research and development expenses. Those investments have required cash payments principally for the development of our software solutions and the testing of those solutions in our labs and on some customer projects. We have not capitalized any of that development effort, so there are no R&D costs to amortize in the future.

Given the strategic focus on Zest Labs moving forward, we divested the remaining assets and operations that principally consisted of our plastic resin and trash can business. The decision to divest approved by our Board resulted in the reclassification of current and historical amounts related to those businesses. Judgment was required to estimate the fair value of the assets that we intended to sell prior to the final sales. We recorded impairments or non-cash write-downs of some of those assets, including intangible assets that include goodwill.derivative liabilities.

 

We have been conservative in our treatment of income taxes. Our historical losses have resulted in net operating losses for tax purposes. Applying accounting policies, we have recorded a “valuation allowance” against both current and future tax benefits of the losses. We will not recognize any benefits until such time as we are assured that we will generate taxable income.Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In additionAugust 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40), Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contract’s in an Entity’s Own Equity. The ASU simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for it. The ASU simplifies the diluted net income per share calculation in certain areas. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2021, and early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2021-04 “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt—Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation— Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815- 40) Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options” which clarifies and reduces diversity in an issuer’s accounting policyfor modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. An entity should measure the effect of a modification or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option that remains equity classified after modification or exchange as follows: i) for a modification or an exchange that is a part of or directly related to a modification or an exchange of an existing debt instrument or line-of-credit or revolving-debt arrangements (hereinafter, referred to as a “debt” or “debt instrument”), as the difference between the fair value of the modified or exchanged written call option and the fair value of that written call option immediately before it is modified or exchanged; ii) for all other modifications or exchanges, as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the modified or exchanged written call option over the fair value of that written call option immediately before it is modified or exchanged. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. An entity should apply the amendments prospectively to modifications or exchanges occurring on or after the effective date of the amendments. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard we adopted for revenue recognition, we adopted several other new accounting standards in fiscal 2018. None of these had a materialon its consolidated financial statements.


The Company does not discuss recent pronouncements that are not anticipated to have an impact on present or pastare unrelated to its financial reporting, but we believe that the early adoptioncondition, results of a number of these standards positions us well for the future.operations, cash flows or disclosures.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Results of Continuing Operations for the Years EndedFiscal year ended March 31, 20192021 compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2020

As the Company acquired Trend Holdings and 2018Banner Midstream during the year ended March 31, 2020 the latter of which was acquired on March 27, 2020, many of the variances between operating revenues and operating expenditures are the result of these acquisitions and the periods are not comparable.

 

Revenues

Revenues for the year ended March 31, 20192021 were $1,062$15,563 as compared to $558$581 for the year ended March 31, 2018.2020, an increase of $14,982. The increase was primarily due to the addition of the oil and gas operations as the result of the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020. Revenues were comprised of $1,000$478 and $500$175 in the financial segment; $0 and $173 in the technology segment; and $15,085 and $233 in the commodity segment for 2019the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2018, respectively, were from a project with Walmart related to freshness solutions. The SaaS revenues of $62 and $58 in 2019 and 2018 were from projects with grocers and produce growers and in 2019 from a precooling operation.2020, respectively.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

 

Cost of revenues for 2019the year ended March 31, 2021 was $699$14,727 as compared to $243$259 for 2018.the year ended March 31, 2020, an increase of $14,468. The significant increase was directly relatedprimarily due to the higher revenues fromaddition of the project with Walmart; however, after paying $1,000oil and gas operations as the result of the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020. Cost of Revenues was comprised of $0 and $0 in the financial segment; $0 and $165 in the technology segment; and $14,727 and $94 in the commodity segment for work on that project, Walmart did not pay the final $500.years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Gross marginmargins decreased from 56% in 201845% for the year ended March 31, 2020 to 34% in 20195% for the year ended March 31, 2021 due to higher costs involved with executing the projects.projects and changes in inventory of crude oil.

 

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for 2019the year ended March 31, 2021 were $14,511$19,437 as compared to $38,845$10,129 for 2018.the year ended March 31, 2020, an increase of $9,308. Operating expenses were comprised of $476 and $729 in the financial segment; $3,415 and $9,330 in the technology segment; and $15,546 and $70 in the commodity segment for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The $24,334 decrease, or 63%,$9,308 increase was due principally to share-based non-cash compensation which decreased by $21,874the expenses, including wages and consulting fees, related to $3,078the addition of the oil and gas operations as the result of the Banner Midstream acquisition on March 27, 2020 and the depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion for Banner Midstream in 2019 from $24,952 in 2018. Operating expenses excluding share-based non-cash compensation for 2019 decreased $2,460 from 2018 principally due to reductions in salaries2021 and related costs and lower research and development expense2020, partially offset by increasesthe reduction in depreciation and impairment.

Salaries and Salary Related Costs

Salaries and related costs for 2019 were $4,848, down $21,114 from $25,962 for 2018. The decrease resulted primarily from a $19,400 decrease in share-based compensation that did not require cash payments. A portion of that cost was derived from estimates of stock option expense calculated using a Black-Scholes model which can vary based on assumptions utilized and share-based compensation expense from awards of stock grants. Additional information on that equity expense can be found in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, which complies with critical accounting policies driven by Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 718-10. In the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2018, reductions in staff were implemented to reduce the cash expenditures of the Company after Walmart did not execute a significant multi-year contract that the Company was led to believe would occur.

Professional Fees and Consulting

Professional fees and consulting expenses for 2019 of $1,315, were down $3,497, or 73%, from $4,812 incurred for 2018.

Share-based non-cash compensation of $405 in 2019 was down $2,424 from $2,410 recorded in 2018. Advisors and consultants associated with compliance requirements of becoming a public entity and capital raising efforts were incurred in 2018, a number of which did not recur in 2019 as cost control measures were instituted. A portion of that share-based compensation cost was calculated using a Black-Scholes model which can vary based on assumptions utilized. Additional information on that equity expense can be found in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, which complies with critical accounting policies driven by ASC 505-50.

Zest Labs selling expenses.

 

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2019the year ended March 31, 2021 were $1,671$8,405 compared with $1,677$1,370 for 2018.the year ended March 31, 2020. Cost reduction initiatives were focused on salary related and professional fees costs. Spendingfor the technology segment offset by the costs incurred for Banner Midstream as this was acquired in other areas included sales and business development efforts were not reduced.March 2020.

 

Depreciation, Amortization, Depletion and ImpairmentAccretion

 

Depreciation, amortization, depletion and impairmentaccretion expenses for 2019the year ended March 31, 2021 were $3,357$1,902 compared to $818$286 for 2018.the year ended March 31, 2020. Depreciation, amortization, depletion and accretion expenses were comprised of $0 and $0 in the financial segment; $250 and $282 in the technology segment; and $1,652 and $4 in the commodity segment for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The $2,539$1,616 increase resulted primarily from impairmentthe acquisition of long-lived tangibleBanner Midstream and intangible assets related to Zest Labs following lossthe depletion and accretion is the result of the expected contract from Walmartoil and depreciation on assets that had been reclassified from inventory to fixed assets at March 31, 2018.gas properties maintained by Banner Midstream. The technology and financing segment do not have depletion or accretion.


47

Research and Development

 

Research and development expense decreased 40%64% to $3,320$883 in 2019the year ended March 31, 2021 compared with $5,576$2,472 in 2018.the year ended March 31, 2020. The $2,256$1,589 reduction in costs related primarily to the maturing of development of the Zest Labs freshness solutions and the termination of joint development efforts with Walmart that had been incurred in 2018.

solutions.

 

Interest and Other ExpenseIncome (Expense)

 

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities for 2019the year ended March 31, 2021 was $3,160a non-cash loss of ($18,518) as compared to $9,316a non-cash loss of ($369) for 2018.the year ended March 31, 2020. The $6,156$18,149 decrease was a result of less volatilitythe fluctuation in the stock price in 2019the year ended March 31, 2021 compared to 2018.the year ended March 31, 2020. In addition, there was a non-cash gain in the year ended March 31, 2021 from the extinguishment of the derivative liabilities that when converted to shares of common stock of $21,084 compared to ($2,099) in the prior year. In the year ended March 31, 2021, there was a non-cash loss on the conversion of debt and other liabilities to shares of common stock of $3,969, a gain on forgiveness of debt of PPP loans of $1,850 and a loss on the sale of fixed assets and abandonment of oil and gas properties of $105 and $109, respectively.

 

Interest expense, net of interest income, for 2019the year ended March 31, 2021 was $417$2,520 as compared to $55$422 for 2018.the year ended March 31, 2020. The $362 increase was athe result of the interest incurred on a $10,000 credit facility establishedthe debt assumed in December 2018.

the Banner Midstream acquisition as well as the value related to the granting of warrants for interest of $2,042 and the amortization of debt discount of $149.

 

Net Loss

 

Net loss from continuing operations for the year ended March 31, 20192021 was $13,650$20,888 as compared to $32,836$12,137 for the year ended March 31, 2018.2020. The $19,186 decrease$8,751 increase in net loss was primarily due to the $25,342 decrease in operating expenses described above offset by an increase of $48 in gross profit, a decrease of $6,156 in the changenon-cash changes in the fair value of the derivative liabilitiesliability and the increase innon-cash losses incurred on the conversion of debt to equity, offset by the non-cash gain on the exchange of warrants for common stock and forgiveness of debt of the PPP loans described herein. The net interest expenseincome (loss) was comprised of $362. As described in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward for income tax purposes totaling approximately $98,293 at March 31, 2019 that can be utilized to reduce future income taxes. A valuation allowance has been estimated such that no deferred tax assets have been recognized($15) and ($554) in the financial statements.

Resultssegment; ($3,502) and ($11,637) in the technology segment; and net loss of Discontinued Operations

On April 14, 2017,($17,371) and $52 in the Company sold the assets, liabilities and membership interests in Eco3d to a group led by executives of Eco3d after the Company’s Board concluded that Eco3d did not fit the future strategic direction of the Company. In accordance with ASC 205-20, and having met the criteria for “held for sale”, the Company had reflected amounts relating to Eco3d as a disposal group classified as held for sale at March 31, 2017 and has included amounts relating to Eco3d as part of discontinued operations. In addition, as a result of receiving letters of intent for the sale of key assets of Sable, Pioneer and Magnolia Solar, and the approval by the Company’s Board to sell the assets, those assets are included in assets held for sale and their operations included in discontinued operations.

Loss from discontinued operationscommodity segment for the year ended March 31, 2019 was $2,300, an improvement from the loss of $4,181 incurred in 2018.  Revenues from discontinued operations were $9,883, up slightly from $9,541 in 2018. Sable increased revenues by 20% due to a 10% increase in shipments2021 and achieving higher selling prices per pound. Pioneer had a 30% decrease in sales due to a 23% decrease in shipments and a lower price per unit.2020, respectively.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations, and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. Significant factors in the management of liquidity are funds generated by operations, levels of accounts receivable and accounts payable and capital expenditures.

To date we have financed our operations through sales of common stock and the issuance of debt, including funds from a $10,000 credit facility established with a lender in December 2018. The Company is required to pay interest biannually on the outstanding principal amount of each loan under the credit facility calculated at an annual rate of 12%. The Company is able to request draws from the lender up to $1,000 with a cap of $10,000, including the $1,000 advanced on December 28, 2018 and an additional $350 advanced through March 31, 2019. If principal is prepaid, the loans may not be re-borrowed and the cap of $10,000 shall be reduced. The Company may make a request for a loan or loans from the lender, at any one time and from time to time, from the date of the agreement until the earlier of (i) demand by the lender or (ii) December 27, 2020 or the earlier termination of the agreement pursuant to the terms thereof. Loans made pursuant to the agreement are secured by a security interest in the Company’s collateral held with the lender and guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiary, Zest Labs.

The Company pays to the lender a 3.5% commitment fee on the principal amount of each loan requested. The Company also paid an arrangement fee of $300 to the lender upon execution of the agreement. The fees were netted from proceeds from the $1,000 initial advance. Zest Labs is a plaintiff in a litigation styled asZest Labs, Inc. vs WalMart, Inc., Case Number 4:18-cv-00500 filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (the “Zest Litigation”). The Company agrees that within five days of receipt by Zest Labs or the Company of any settlement proceeds from the Zest Litigation, the Company will pay or cause to be paid over to lender an additional fee in an amount equal to (i) 0.50 multiplied by (ii) the highest aggregate principal balance of the loans over the life of the loans through the date of the payment from settlement proceeds; provided, however, that such additional fee shall not exceed the amount of the settlement proceeds. See additional details regarding the credit facility in Note 10 to the financial statements.


At March 31, 2019 and 2018 we had cash of $244 and $3,730, respectively, and a working capital deficit of $5,045 in 2019 compared with a working capital deficit of $433 at the end of 2018. The decrease in working capital is the result of the net cash used in operating activities, offset by the cash flows from financing activities and a reduction resulting from the reclassification of Zest Labs inventory to property and equipment. The Company is dependent upon raising additional capital from future financing transactions.

 

Net cash used in operating activities was $9,040($12,639) for the year ended March 31, 2019,2021, as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $17,643($5,490) for the year ended March 31, 2018.2020. Cash used in operating activities is related to the Company’s net loss partially offset by non-cash expenses, including share-based compensation and depreciation, amortizationthe change in the fair value of the derivative liability and impairments. The decreasenet losses incurred in operating cash burn was impacted favorably by collectionsthe conversion of receivablesdebt and lower cash used by discontinued operationsliabilities to shares of common stock as a resultwell as losses on the sale of concerted efforts to improve those operations prior to sale.

fixed assets and abandonment of oil and gas properties.

 

Net cash provided byused in investing activities was $536($6,358) for the year ended March 31, 2019,2021, as compared to $1,752($775) net cash providedused in investing activities for the year ended March 31, 2018.2020. Net cash provided byused in investing activities in 2019 related to proceeds from the sale of Sable assets and for 20182021 related to the proceeds fromadvancement of a note receivable of $275, and the sale of Eco3d. Both 2019 and 2018 uses are related tonet purchases of propertyfixed assets and equipment. oil and gas properties including drilling costs of $2,697.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities in 2019for the year ended March 31, 2021 was $5,018$19,907 that included $4,221$24,287 (net of fees) raised via issuance of common stock $1,350in a direct registered offering, stock for the exercise of warrants and stock options, offset by proceeds and repayments of long-term debt and notes payable including related parties of $4,380. This compared with the year ended March 31, 2020 amounts of $6,427 provided by financing that included $1,137 provided through the credit facility, offset by a $500 repayment$2,000 from the exercise of debtwarrants, $2,980 from proceeds received from the sale of preferred stock and purchases$403 from proceeds from advances from related parties.

To date we have financed our operations through sales of treasury sharescommon stock and the issuance of $53. This compared with 2018 amounts of $10,975 provided by financing, including $12,693 (net of fees) raiseddebt.


In addition to these transactions, the Company in private placement offerings, offset by purchases of treasury shares of $1,618 and repayment of debt to related parties of $100.the period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021, entered into the following transactions:

(a)On April 16, 2020, the Company received $386 in Payroll Protection Program funding related to Ecoark Holdings, and the Company also received on April 13, 2020, $1,482 in Payroll Protection Program funds for Pinnacle Frac LLC, a subsidiary of Banner Midstream. All but $29 has been forgiven as of December 31, 2020.
(b)On May 1, 2020, an institutional investor elected to convert its remaining shares of Series B Preferred shares into 32 common shares.
(c)On April 1 and May 5, 2020, two institutional investors elected to convert their 1 Series C Preferred share into 276 common shares.

(d)On May 10, 2020, the Company received approximately $6,294 from accredited institutional investors holding 276 warrants issued on November 13, 2019 with an exercise price of $3.65 and holding 1,176 warrants with an exercise price of $4.50. The Company agreed to issue to these investors an additional number of warrants as a condition of their agreement to exercise the November 2019 warrants. 
(e)On December 31, 2020, the Company completed a registered direct offering, whereby the Company issued 889 shares of common stock and 889 accompanying warrants to purchase common stock to one institutional investor under the effective Form S-3 at $9.00 per share and accompanying warrant for a total of $8,000 in gross proceeds, before placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The warrants are exercisable for a two-year term at a strike price of $10.00 per share. The Company granted 62 warrants to the placement agent as compensation in addition to the $560 cash commission received by the placement agent The placement agent warrants are exercisable at $11.25 per share and expire on January 2, 2023.

 

At March 31, 2019, $1,350 related2021 we had cash (including restricted cash) of $1,316, and $1,194 as of June 22, 2021. We had a working capital deficit of $11,845 and $16,689 as of March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in the working capital deficit is the result of the non-cash change in the fair value of the derivative liabilities offset by the repayment and conversion of debt and liabilities to shares of common stock. These liabilities were assumed in the $10,000 credit facility was due. Other commitments and contingencies areBanner Midstream acquisition in March 2020. The Company believes it has adequate capital resources to meet its cash requirements during the next 12 months.

The Company raised approximately $16,119 in warrant exercises in the year ended March 31, 2021 as well as $8,001 in a registered direct offering. We expect that the revenue generating operations of Banner Midstream will continue to improve the liquidity of the Company moving forward. However, going forward, the effect of the pandemic on the capital markets may limit our ability to raise additional capital on the terms acceptable to us at the time we need it, if at all. As disclosed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements.

Sincestatements, COVID-19 has had an impact on our inception,management’s ability to operate effectively. The challenges related to remote work and travel restrictions that we as a smaller company have faced in striving to meet our disclosure obligations in a timely manner while taking the Company has experienced negative cash flow from operationssteps to protect the health and expectssafety of our employees have impacted, and may continue to experience significant negative cash flow from operations in the future. We will needfurther impact, our ability to raise additional fundscapital.

The Company pre-funded a majority of the cost, approximately $5,800, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the future so that we can continueAustin Chalk formation of which $3,387 was expensed as drilling costs as part of their Participation Agreement with Blackbrush Oil & Gas, L.P. The Company paid the amount of the drilling costs into a designated escrow account which occurred in January 2021.

On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest a total of $115 million in damages. See “Part I. Item 3. Legal Proceedings” for further information. However, due to expand operations and repay indebtedness. The inabilityexpected appeals, the Company does not expect to obtain additional capital may restrict our ability to grow and may reducereceive the ability to continue to conduct business operations.

proceeds until approximately 2025.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements 

 

As of March 31, 2019,2021 and 2020, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.


49

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 20192021

 

Table of Contents

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsF-1 – F-2
Balance SheetsF-3
Statements of OperationsF-4
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)F-5
Statements of Cash FlowsF-6
Notes to Financial StatementsF-7 – F-43F-55

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICPUCLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

805 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Tel. 212.838.5100

Fax 212.838.2676

www.rbsmllp.com

To the Audit Committee and Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Ecoark Holdings, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), as of March 31, 2019,2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for fiscal yeareach of the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 20192021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidatedconsolidated financial statements”)statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2019,2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the fiscalyears in the two year period ended March 31, 2019,2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The companyCompany is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Company’sits internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit,audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our auditaudits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.

Our auditaudits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Going Concern ConsiderationCritical Audit Matters

 

The accompanying consolidatedCritical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1were communicated or required to be communicated to the consolidatedaudit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements the Company has sustained significant operating losses and needs to obtain additional financing to continue its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters(2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. We determined that there are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. no critical audit matters.

 

/s/ RBSM LLP

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 20192019.

 

Larkspur, CA

August 19, 2019


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2018, and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2018, based on criteria established in the2013 Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting related to the lack of segregation of duties, the lack of communication on current information for inclusion in disclosures of the quarterly and annual filings, and in the accounting for certain debt and equity transactions which have resulted in the restatement of the Company’s financial statements.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses referred to above is described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. We considered these material weaknesses in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2018, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal controls over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Going Concern Consideration

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has sustained significant operating losses and needs to obtain additional financing to continue the services they provide. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Restatement of Financial Statements

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has identified errors in the accounting for certain embedded derivative liabilities in connection with warrants issued in capital raises. As a result of these errors, the Company recognized $13,010 (in thousands) in derivative liabilities as of March 31, 2018, that were previously recorded in stockholders’ equity as additional paid in capital. In addition, the Company recognized $9,316 (in thousands) of gains in the fair value of these derivative liabilities, resulting in a liability of $3,694 (in thousands) at March 31, 2018. These errors resulted in decreasing the net loss for the year ended March 31, 2018 from $42,152 (in thousands) to $32,836 (in thousands) and decreasing the loss per share from ($0.93) to ($0.72).

/s/ KBL, LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009 through 2018.

KBL, LLP

New York, NYNew York

June 27, 2018, except Note 3 which is dated August 13, 201929, 2021


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF MARCH 31, 2021 AND 2020

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

  MARCH 31,  MARCH 31, 
  2021  2020 
       
ASSETS      
CURRENT ASSETS:      
Cash ($85 and $85 pledged as collateral for credit as of March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively and $250 and $50 restricted as of March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively) $1,316  $406 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $709 and $500 as of March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively  1,136   172 
Note receivable, net of allowance of $0 and $25 as of March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively  -   - 
Inventories - Crude Oil  122   - 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,995   676 
         
Total current assets  4,569   1,254 
         
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:        
Property and equipment, net  3,695   3,965 
Intangible assets, net  2,065   2,350 
Oil and gas properties, full cost-method  12,352   6,135 
Capitalized drilling costs, net of depletion  2,567   - 
Goodwill  10,225   10,225 
Right of use assets - financing leases  445   589 
Right of use assets - operating leases  479   142 
Non-current assets of discontinued operations  194   249 
Other assets  -   7 
         
Total non-current assets  32,022   23,662 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $36,591  $24,916 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
LIABILITIES        
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable $3,614  $751 
Accrued liabilities  3,591   3,036 
Due to prior owners  -   2,358 
Warrant derivative liabilities  7,213   2,775 
Current portion of long-term debt  1,056   6,401 
Note payable - related parties  578   2,172 
Current portion of lease liability - financing leases  141   137 
Current portion of lease liability - operating leases  212   85 
Current liabilities of discontinued operations  9   228 
         
Total current liabilities  16,414   17,943 
         
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Lease liability - financing leases, net of current portion  295   436 
Lease liability - operating leases, net of current portion  309   74 
Long-term debt, net of current portion  1,012   421 
Asset retirement obligations  1,532   295 
         
Total non-current liabilities  3,148   1,226 
         
Total Liabilities  19,562   19,169 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Numbers of shares rounded to thousands)        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; none and 1 (Series C) issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 30,000 shares authorized, 22,705 shares issued and 22,589 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2021, and 40,000 shares authorized, 17,175 shares issued and 17,058 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2020  23   17 
Additional paid in capital  167,588   135,424 
Accumulated deficit  (148,911)  (128,023)
Treasury stock, at cost  (1,671)  (1,671)
         
Total stockholders' equity  17,029   5,747 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $36,591  $24,916 

  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 
  2019  2018 
ASSETS    (Restated) 
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash ($35 pledged as collateral for credit) $244  $3,730 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $573 and $87 as of March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, respectively  520   2,617 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  900   242 
Current assets held for sale – (Note 2)  23   645 
Total current assets  1,687   7,234 
NON-CURRENT ASSETS        
Property and equipment, net  824   2,619 
Intangible assets, net  -   1,545 
Non-current assets held for sale – (Note 2)  -   1,023 
Other assets  27   26 
Total non-current assets  851   5,213 
TOTAL ASSETS $2,538  $12,447 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
Accounts payable $1,416  $2,350 
Accrued liabilities  828   1,080 
Note payable  1,350   - 
Derivative liabilities – (Note 3)  3,104   3,694 
Current portion of long-term debt  -   500 
Current liabilities held for sale – (Note 2)  34   43 
Total current liabilities  6,732   7,667 
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES        
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
Total liabilities  6,732   7,667 
         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Numbers of shares rounded to thousands)        
         
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; none issued  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 52,571 shares issued and 51,986 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and 49,468 shares issued and 48,923 outstanding as of March 31, 2018  53   49 
Additional paid-in-capital  113,310   108,585 
Accumulated deficit  (115,886)  (102,236)
Treasury stock, at cost  (1,671)  (1,618)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  (4,194)  4,780 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $2,538  $12,447 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2021 AND 2020

(in thousands, except per share data)

  YEARS ENDED 
  MARCH 31, 
  2021  2020 
CONTINUING OPERATIONS:      
       
REVENUES $15,563  $581 
COST OF REVENUES  14,727   259 
GROSS PROFIT  836   322 
         
         
OPERATING EXPENSES        
Salaries and salary related costs  6,836   3,668 
Professional fees and consulting  1,411   2,333 
Other selling, general and administrative costs  8,405   1,370 
Depreciation, amortization, depletion, and accretion  1,902   286 
Research and development  883   2,472 
         
Total operating expenses  19,437   10,129 
         
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)  (18,601)  (9,807)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)        
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (18,518)  (369)
Gain (loss) on exchange of warrants for common stock  21,084   (2,099)
Gain (loss) on conversion of long-term debt and accrued expenses  (3,969)  541 
Forgiveness of debt  1,850   - 
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets  (105)  17 
Loss on abandonment of oil and gas property  (83)  - 
Interest expense, net of interest income  (2,546)  (422)
Total other income (expense)  (2,287)  (2,332)
         
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE BENEFIT (PROVISION) FOR INCOME TAXES  (20,888)  (12,139)
         
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:        
Loss from discontinued operations  -   - 
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations  -   2 
Total discontinued operations  -   2 
         
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE BENEFIT (PROVISION) FOR INCOME TAXES  (20,888)  (12,137)
         
BENEFIT (PROVISION) FOR INCOME TAXES  -   - 
         
NET LOSS $(20,888) $(12,137)
         
NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED $(1.02) $(0.95)
         
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED  20,551   12,811 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2021 AND 2020

(Dollar amounts and number of shares in thousands)

           Additional          
  Preferred  Common Stock  Paid-In  Accumulated  Treasury    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Stock  Total 
                         
Balance - March 31, 2019  -  $-   10,516  $11  $113,352  $(115,886) $(1,671) $(4,194)
                                 
Shares issued in acquisition of Trend Holdings  -   -   1,100   1   3,235   -   -   3,236 
Shares issued in the exercise of warrants, net of adjustments to derivative liabilities  -   -   1,303   1   5,478   -   -   5,479 
Shares issued in exercise of warrants for cash  -   -   784   -   2,000   -   -   2,000 
Shares issued for services rendered  -   -   160   -   717   -   -   717 
Shares issued in conversion of debt and accrued interest  -   -   771   1   2,274   -   -   2,275 
Shares issued in acquisition of Banner Midstream  -   -   1,789   2   4,864   -   -   4,866 
Shares issued for cash (Series B), net of expenses and adjustments to derivative liabilities  2   -   -   -   406   -   -   406 
Shares issued for cash (Series C), net of expenses and adjustments to derivative liabilities  1   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Conversion of preferred shares (Series B) to common shares  (2)  -   752   1   (1)  -   -   - 
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   -   3,099   -   -   3,099 
                                 
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   -   -   (12,137)  -   (12,137)
                                 
Balance - March 31, 2020  1   -   17,175   17   135,424   (128,023)  (1,671)  5,747 
                                 
Shares issued in exercise of warrants for cash  -   -   3,172   3   16,116   -   -   16,119 
Shares issued in conversion of debt and accrued interest  -   -   716   1   6,576   -   -   6,577 
Shares issued in conversion of accounts payable and accrued expenses  -   -   93   -   676   -   -   676 
Shares issued in the exercise of stock options  -   -   149   -   502   -   -   502 
Shares issued for services rendered  -   -   30   -   485   -   -   485 
Shares issued in acquisition of oil and gas properties and fixed assets (including $10 of ARO)  -   -   172   -   2,750   -   -   2,750 
Shares issued for cash, net of expenses and adjustment to derivative liabilities (of $4,655)  -   -   889   1   3,010   -   -   3,011 
Conversion of preferred shares (Series C) to common shares  (1)  -   308   1   (1)  -   -   - 
Share adjustment - reverse split  -   -   1   -   -   -   -   - 
Share-based compensation  -   -   -   -   2,050   -   -   2,050 
                                 
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   -   -   (20,888)  -   (20,888)
                                 
Balance - March 31, 2021  -  $     -   22,705  $23  $167,588  $(148,911) $(1,671) $17,029 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsstatements.


F-5

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSCASH FLOWS

FISCALFOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2021 AND 2020

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

  2021  2020 
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVIITES      
Net loss $(20,888) $(12,137)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities        
Depreciation, amortization, depletion, and accretion  1,902   286 
Share-based compensation  2,050   3,816 
Forgiveness of debt  (1,850)  - 
Bad debt, net of recovery  184   - 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  18,518   369 
(Gain) loss on exchange of warrants  (21,084)  2,099 
Interest expense on warrant derivative liabilities  -   107 
Common shares issued for services  485   - 
Commitment fees on credit facility advances  -   38 
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets  105   (17)
Loss on abandonment of oil and gas property  83   - 
Warrants granted for interest expense  2,042   - 
Warrants granted for commissions  307   - 
(Gain) loss on conversion of debt and liabilities to common stock  3,969   (541)
Amortization of debt discount  149   - 
Changes in assets and liabilities        
Accounts receivable  (1,173)  475 
Inventory  (122)  - 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (990)  537 
Amortization of right of use asset - financing leases  144   - 
Amortization of right of use asset - operating leases  160   - 
Other assets  (4)  21 
Interest on lease liability - financing leases  (137)  - 
Interest on lease liability - operating leases  (80)  - 
Accounts payable  2,863   (838)
Deferred revenue  -   (23)
Accrued liabilities  947   329 
Total adjustments  8,485   6,658 
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations  (12,420)  (5,479)
Net cash used in discontinued operations  (219)  (11)
Net cash used in operating activities  (12,639)  (5,490)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITES        
Cash received in acquisition of Trend Holdings  -   3 
Cash received in acquisition of Banner Midstream  -   205 
Advance of note receivable  (275)  - 
Purchases of oil and gas properties, net of asset retirement obligations  (3,188)  - 
Drilling costs capitalized  (2,697)  - 
Investment in Banner Midstream (pre-acquisition)  -   (1,000)
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets  43   17 
Purchase of fixed assets  (241)  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (6,358)  (775)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITES        
Proceeds from exercise of warrants, net of fees  16,119   2,000 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  502   - 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of fees  7,666   - 
Proceeds from notes payable - related parties  954   403 
Repayments of notes payable - related parties  (1,973)  (75)
Proceeds from long-term debt  1,869   - 
Repayment of long-term debt  (4,100)  (14)
Repayment to prior owners  (1,130)  (4)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of fees  -   2,980 
Proceeds from credit facility  -   1,137 
Net cash provided by financing activities  19,907   6,427 
         
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH  910   162 
         
CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH - BEGINNING OF YEAR  406   244 
         
CASH AND RESTRICTED CASH- END OF YEAR $1,316  $406 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES        
Cash paid for interest expense $769  $295 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 
         
SUMMARY OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:        
         
Exchange of common stock for warrants $-  $5,479 
Issuance of shares for prepaid expenses $-  $247 
Preferred stock converted into common stock $-  $4 
Conversion of long-term debt and notes payable and accrued interest into common stock $6,577  $2,275 
Conversion of accounts payable and accrued liabilities into common stock $676  $- 
Shares issued for acquisition of oil and gas properties and fixed assets, net of asset retirement obligations of $10 $2,760  $- 
Note receivable offset against oil and gas reserves in acquisition of Rabb $304  $- 
Trade in of vehicle for ROU asset $55  $- 
Lease liability recognized for ROU asset $442  $- 
Derivative liability recorded in issuance of common stock $4,655  $- 
         
Assets and liabilities acquired for Banner Midstream:        
         
Accounts receivable $-  $110 
Oil and gas receivable  -   7 
Prepaid expenses      578 
Property and equipment      3,426 
Right of use assets      731 
Oil and gas properties  -   6,135 
Customer relationships  -   2,100 
Non-compete agreements  -   250 
Goodwill  -   7,003 
Assets of discontinued operations  -   249 
Accounts payable  -   (268)
Accrued expenses  -   (1,721)
Due to prior owners  -   (2,362)
Accrued interest  -   (640)
Other current liabilities  -   (1)
Lease liability  -   (732)
Liabilities of discontinued operations  -   (228)
Asset retirement obligations  -   (295)
Notes payable - related parties  -   (1,844)
Long-term debt  -   (6,836)
         
Total net assets acquired $-  $5,662 
         
Assets and liabilities acquired for Trend Holdings:        
         
Other receivables $-  $10 
Other assets  -   1 
Goodwill  -   3,222 
         
Total net assets acquired $-  $3,233 

  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 
  2019  2018 
     (Restated) 
CONTINUING OPERATIONS:      
REVENUES (Note 4) $1,062  $558 
         
COST OF REVENUES  699   243 
         
GROSS PROFIT  363   315 
OPERATING EXPENSES:        
Salaries and salary related costs, including non-cash share-based compensation of $2,722 and $20,592 for 2019 and 2018, respectively (Note 13)  4,848   25,962 
Professional fees and consulting, including non-cash share-based compensation of $405 and $2,860 for 2019 and 2018, respectively (Note 13)  1,315   4,812 
Other selling, general and administrative  1,671   1,677 
Depreciation, amortization, and impairment  3,357   818 
Research and development  3,320   5,576 
Total operating expenses  14,511   38,845 
Loss from continuing operations before other expenses  (14,148)  (38,530)
         
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):        
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  3,160   9,316 
Interest expense, net of interest income  (417)  (55)
Total other income  2,743   9,261 
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (11,405)  (29,269)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:        
Loss from discontinued operations  (2,300)  (4,181)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations  57   636 
Total discontinued operations  (2,243)  (3,545)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (2)  (22)
NET LOSS $(13,650) $(32,836)
         
NET LOSS PER SHARE        
Basic and diluted: Continuing operations $(0.23) $(0.64)
Discontinued operations $(0.04) $(0.08)
Total $(0.27) $(0.72)
         
SHARES USED IN CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE        
Basic and diluted  51,010   45,500 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsF-6


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

MARCH 31, 2019

(Restated)

(Dollar amounts and number of shares in thousands)

  Preferred  Common  Additional
Paid-In-
  Accumulated  Treasury    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Stock  Total 
Balances at April 1, 2017 (Restated)  -  $-   42,330  $42  $80,845  $(69,400) $-  $11,487 
                                 
Shares issued for cash in private placement, net of expenses  -   -   5,000   5   3,029   -   -   3,034 
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock – Board of Directors  -   -   201   -   550   -   -   550 
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock – services rendered  -   -   65   -   596   -   -   596 
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock – employees  -   -   1,783   2   20,590   -   -   20,592 
                                 
Purchase shares from employees in lieu of taxes  -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,618)  (1,618)
                                 
Stock issued to purchase 440 Labs  -   -   300   -   1,500   -   -   1,500 
                                 
Share-based compensation due to employment agreements  -   -   300   -   1,500   -   -   1,500 
                                 
Warrant conversion – cashless  -   -   49   -   -   -   -   - 
                                 
Sale of Eco3d, shares received and cancelled  -   -   (560)  -   (25)  -   -   (25)
                                 
Net loss for the period  -   -   -   -   -   (32,836)  -   (32,836)
                                 
Balances at March 31, 2018 (Restated)  -   -   49,468   49   108,585   (102,236)  (1,618)  4,780 
                                 
Shares issued for cash in private placement, net of expenses  -   -   2,969   3   1,648   -   -   1,651 
                                 
Share-based compensation – options – Board of Directors  -   -   -   -   400   -   -   400 
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock – services rendered  -   -   -   -   (14)  -   -   (14)
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock, options – employees  -   -   134   1   2,691   -   -   2,692 
                                 
Purchase shares from employees in lieu of taxes  -   -   -   -   -   -   (53)  (53)
                                 
Net loss for the period  -   -   -   -   -   (13,650)  -   (13,650)
                                 
Balances at March 31, 2019  -  $-   52,571  $53  $113,310  $(115,886) $(1,671) $(4,194)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31

  (Dollars in thousands) 
  2019  2018 
     (Restated) 
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(13,650) $(32,836)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation, amortization and impairment  3,357   3,041 
Bad debt expense  486   - 
Share-based compensation - services rendered  400   2,860 
Share-based compensation - employees  2,673   20,592 
Share-based compensation due to employment agreements  -   1,500 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (3,160)  (9,316)
Adjusted loss from discontinued operations  1,848   4,181 
Gain on sale of discontinued operations  (57)  (636)
Loss on retirement of assets  5   61 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  1,611   (1,060)
Inventory  -   (983)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (36)  34 
Other assets  (26)  6 
Accounts payable  (934)  634 
Accrued liabilities  291   (1,691)
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations  (7,192)  (13,613)
Net cash used in discontinued operations  (1,848)  (4,030)
Net cash used in operating activities  (9,040)  (17,643)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations  825   2,029 
Purchases of short-term investments  -   (1,001)
Redemption of short-term investments  -   1,001 
Purchases of property and equipment  (289)  (277)
Net cash provided by investing activities  536   1,752 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants, net of fees  4,221   12,693 
Proceeds from credit facility  1,350   - 
Purchase of treasury shares from employees  (53)  (1,618)
Repayments of debt - related parties  -   (100)
Repayments of debt  (500)  - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  5,018   10,975 
NET DECREASE IN CASH  (3,486)  (4,916)
Cash - beginning of period  3,730   8,646 
Cash - end of period $244  $3,730 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:        
Cash paid for interest $382  $60 
Cash paid for income taxes $2  $- 
         
SUMMARY OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:        
Inventory reclassified to property and equipment $-  $2,477 
         
Assets and liabilities acquired via acquisition of companies:        
         
Identifiable intangible assets $-  $1,435 
Goodwill $-  $65 
Other assets $-  $28 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Dollar amounts and numbers of shares that follow in this report are presented in thousands, except per share amounts.

Ecoark Holdings Inc. (“Ecoark Holdings” or the “Company”) is an innovative AgTecha diversified holding company, that isincorporated in the state of Nevada on November 19, 2007. Through Ecoark Holdings wholly owned subsidiaries, the Company has operations in three areas: (i) oil and gas, including exploration, production and drilling operations on over 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi and transportation services, (ii) post-harvest shelf-life and freshness food management technology, and (iii) financial services including investments in a select number of early stage startups each year. Since the acquisition of Banner Midstream Corp. on March 27, 2020, which currently comprises the exploration, production and drilling operations, the Company has focused its efforts to a considerable extent on modernizing the post-harvest fresh food supply chain forexpanding its exploration and production footprint and capabilities by acquiring real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases. The Company’s subsidiaries consist of Ecoark, Inc. (“Ecoark”), a wide range of organizations including growers, processors, distributors and retailers. Ecoark HoldingsDelaware corporation which is the parent company of Ecoark,Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs”), Banner Midstream Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”) and Magnolia SolarTrend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”).

On June 6, 2019,March 27, 2020, the Company announced that it hadand Banner Energy Services Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Banner Parent”), entered into a definitive agreementStock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Banner Purchase Agreement”) to acquire Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc. (“Trend Discovery”)Banner Midstream Corp., a fund management company.

Ecoark, Inc.Delaware corporation (“Ecoark”Banner Midstream”) was founded in 2011. Ecoark merged into. Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Magnolia Solar Corporation (“MSC”) on March 24, 2016, with Ecoark as the surviving entity. At the merger, MSC changed its name to Ecoark Holdings, Inc. Ecoark is the parent company of Eco360, Pioneer ProductsCompany and Zest Labs (formerly known as Intelleflex Corporation). Ecoark was also the parent company of Eco3d until it was sold in April 2017, as discussed below. 

Eco3d, LLC (“Eco3d”) was located in Phoenix, Arizona and provides customers with 3d technologies. Eco3d was formed by Ecoark in November 2013 and Ecoark owned 65%Banner Parent received shares of the LLC. The remaining 35% was reflected as non-controlling interest until September 2016 when Ecoark Holdings issued shares ofCompany’s common stock in exchange for all of the 35% non-controlling interest. Eco3d provides 3d mapping, modeling,issued and consulting services for clients in retail, construction, healthcare, and other industries throughout the United States. As described further in Note 2, in March 2017 the Ecoark Holdings Boardoutstanding shares of Directors (“Ecoark Holdings Board”) approved a plan to sell Eco3d, and the sale was completed in April 2017. Banner Midstream.

 

Eco360,Banner Midstream has four operating subsidiaries: Pinnacle Frac Transport LLC (“Eco360”Pinnacle Frac”) was, Capstone Equipment Leasing LLC (“Capstone”), White River Holdings Corp. (“White River”), and Shamrock Upstream Energy LLC (“Shamrock”). Pinnacle Frac provides transportation of frac sand and logistics services to major hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations. Capstone procures and finances equipment to oilfield transportation service contractors. These two operating subsidiaries of Banner Midstream are revenue producing entities. White River and Shamrock are engaged in researchoil and development activities. Eco360gas exploration, production, and drilling operations on over 20,000 cumulative acres of active mineral leases in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

On June 11, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SR Acquisition I, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of 262 total wells in Mississippi and Louisiana, approximately 9,000 acres of active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment. The 262 total wells include 57 active producing wells, 19 active disposal wells, 136 shut-in with future utility wells, and 50 shut-in pending plugging wells. Included in the assignment are 4 wells in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale formation. One of the leases acquired in this transaction was formedsold in November 2014 by Ecoark. Eco360 does not currently have any active operations.2020.

 

Pioneer Products,On June 18, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SN TMS, LLC (“Pioneer Products”) was involved in for $1 as part of the sellingongoing bankruptcy reorganization of recycled plastic productsSanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of wells, active mineral leases, and other products. It sold to the world’s largest retailer. Pioneer Products was purchased by Ecoark in 2012. Pioneer Products acquired Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC in a stock transaction on May 3, 2016, so its results were included with Pioneer’s since May 2016. As described in Note 2, in May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Pioneer,drilling production materials and it ceased operations in February 2019.equipment.

F-7

 

Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC (“Sable”) was located in Flowery Branch, Georgia and specialized in the sale, purchase and processing of post-consumer and post-industrial plastic materials. It provided products to a variety of suppliers and customers throughout the plastics processing industry, from small extruders, molders and scrap collectors to large corporations. As described in Note 2, in May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Sable, and its key assets were sold in March 2019.

Zest Labs, Inc. (“Zest Labs”) is located in San Jose, California and offers freshness management solutions for grocers, restaurants, growers, manufacturers and suppliers. Its Zest Fresh solution is a cloud-based post-harvest freshness management solution that improves delivered quality and reduces losses due to temperature handling and processing by intelligently matching customer freshness requirements with actual product freshness. It focuses on four primary value propositions – operational efficiency, consistent food freshness, reduced waste, and improved food safety. Zest Fresh empowers workers with real-time analytic tools and alerts that improve efficiency while driving quality consistency through best practice adherence at a pallet level. The Zest Delivery solution offers dynamic monitoring and control for prepared food delivery containers, helping delivery and dispatch personnel ensure the quality and safety of delivered food. Zest Labs (then known as Intelleflex Corporation) was purchased by Ecoark in September 2013. Effective October 28, 2016, Intelleflex Corporation changed its name to Zest Labs, Inc. to align its corporate name with its mission and the brand name of its products and services. Zest Labs acquired 440labs, Inc. in a stock transaction on May 23, 2017.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

On August 14, 2020, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, White River E&P LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company Rabb Resources, LTD. and Claude Rabb, the sole owner of Rabb Resources, LTD. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Rabb Resources, LTD. The acquired assets consisted of certain real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases. The Company in June 2020 previously provided for bridge financing to Rabb Resources, LTD under the $225 Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note. As consideration for entering into the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to pay Rabb Resources, LTD. A total of $3,500 consisting of (i) $1,500 in cash, net of $304 in outstanding amounts related to the note receivable and accrued interest receivable, and (ii) $2,000 payable in common stock of the Company, which based on the closing price of the common stock as of the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement equaled 103 shares. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the Rabb Resources, LTD historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

On September 4, 2020, White River SPV 3, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banner Midstream entered into an Agreement and Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease with a privately held limited liability company (the “Assignor”). Under the Lease Assignment, the Assignor assigned a 100% working interest (75% net revenue interest) in a certain oil and gas lease covering in excess of 1,600 acres (the “Lease”), and White River paid $1,500 in cash to the Assignor. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

On October 9, 2020, the Company and White River SPV, entered into a Participation Agreement (the “Participation Agreement”) by and among the Company, White River SPV, BlackBrush Oil & Gas, L.P. (“BlackBrush”) and GeoTerre, LLC, an unrelated privately-held limited liability company (the “Assignor”), to conduct drilling of wells in the Austin Chalk formation.

Pursuant to the Participation Agreement, the Company and White River SPV pre-funded a majority of the cost, approximately $5,800, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation of which $3,387 was expensed as drilling costs. The Participation Agreement required the drilling costs that were paid into a designated escrow account at the commencement of the drilling in January 2021, which it was. BlackBrush agreed to assign to the other parties to the Participation Agreement, subject to certain exceptions and limitations specified therein, specified portions of its leasehold working interest in certain Austin Chalk formation units. The Participation Agreement provides for an initial allocation of the working interests and net revenue interests among the assignor, BlackBrush and the Company and then a re-allocation upon payout or payment of drilling and completion costs for each well drilled. Prior to payout, the Company will own 90% of the working interest and 67.5% of the net revenue interest in each well. Following payout, the Company will own 70% of working interest and 52.5% net revenue interest in each well.

F-8

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

The Parties to the Participation Agreement, except for the Company, had previously entered into a Joint Operating Agreement, dated September 4, 2020 (the “Operating Agreement”) establishing an area of mutual interest, including the Austin Chalk formation, and governing the parties’ rights and obligations with respect to drilling, completion and operation of wells therein. The Participation Agreement and the Operating Agreement require, among other things, that White River SPV and the Company drill and complete at least one horizontal Austin Chalk well with a certain minimum lateral each calendar year and/or maintain leasehold by paying its proportionate share of any rental payments.

On September 30, 2020, the Company and White River Energy, LLC (“White River Energy”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered into three Asset Purchase Agreements (the “Asset Purchase Agreements”) with privately-held limited liability companies to acquire working interests in the Harry O’Neal oil and gas mineral lease (the “O’Neal OGML”), the related well bore, crude oil inventory and equipment. Immediately prior to the acquisition, White River Energy owned an approximately 61% working interest in the O’Neal OGML oil well and a 100% working interest in any future wells.

The purchase prices of these leases were $126, $312 and $312, respectively, totaling $750. The consideration paid to the Sellers was in the form of 68 shares of common stock. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

In February and March 2021, the Company acquired additional leases for $916 under the Blackbrush/Deshotel lease related to the Participation Agreement.

Effective with the opening of trading on December 17, 2020, the Company effected a one-for-five reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock and a simultaneous proportionate reduction of its authorized common stock. The reverse stock split was implemented without obtaining stockholder approval as permitted by Nevada law, and the authorized common stock was proportionately reduced to 40,000 shares. All share and per share figures are reflected on a post-split basis herein.

Effective December 29, 2020, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to reduce the authorized common stock from 40,000 shares to 30,000 shares.

On December 31, 2020, the Company completed a registered direct offering, whereby the Company issued 889 shares of common stock and 889 accompanying warrants to one institutional investor under the effective Form S-3 at $9.00 per share and accompanying warrant for a total of $8,000 in gross proceeds, before placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The warrants are exercisable for a two-year term at a strike price of $10.00 per share. The Company granted 62 warrants to the placement agent as compensation in addition to the $560 cash commission received by the placement agent. The placement agent warrants are exercisable at $11.25 per share and expire on January 2, 2023.

On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest a total of $115 million in damages which includes $65 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. liable on three counts. The federal jury found that Walmart Inc. misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. The Company has filed post-trial motions to add an award for their attorneys’ fees as the prevailing party in the litigation. 

F-9

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

 

440labs, Inc.(“440labs”) is located near Boston, Massachusetts and is a software development and information solutions provider for cloud, mobile, and IoT (Internet of Things) applications. 440labs had been a key development partner with Zest Labs for more than four years prior to the May 2017 acquisition, contributing its expertise in scalable enterprise cloud solutions and mobile applications.

Magnolia Solar Inc. (“Magnolia Solar”) is located in Albany, New York and is principally engaged in the development and commercialization of nanotechnology-based, high-efficiency, thin-film technology that can be deposited on a variety of substrates, including glass and flexible structures. Magnolia Solar was a subsidiary of MSC that merged with Ecoark on March 24, 2016 to create Ecoark Holdings and continued operations as a subsidiary of Ecoark Holdings. As described in Note 2, in May 2018 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Magnolia Solar, and the sale was completed in May 2019.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ecoark Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, collectively referred to as “the Company”. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Ecoark Holdings is a holding company that holds 100% of Ecoark and Magnolia Solar. Ecoark holds 100% of Eco360, Pioneer Products (which owns 100% of Sable), Zest Labs and, until April 2017, Eco3d. As described further in Note 2, in March 2017 the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell Eco3d, and the sale was completed in April 2017. Ecoark previously owned 65% of Eco3d and the remaining 35% interest was owned by executives of Eco3d until September 2016 when the executives’ 35% interest was acquired in exchange for 525 shares of Ecoark Holdings stock. In conjunction with the sale of Eco3d in April 2017, the 525 shares were reacquired by the Company and canceled.  

 

In May 2018, the Ecoark Holdings Board approved a plan to sell key assets of Pioneer (including the assets of Sable) and Magnolia Solar. Relevant assetsBoth of these subsidiaries were sold in May 2019.

On May 31, 2019, the Company entered into an Agreement and liabilities are classified as heldPlan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) for salethe Company to acquire 100% of Trend Holdings pursuant to a merger of Trend Holdings with and operations as discontinuedinto the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed, and Trend Holdings is now included in the consolidated financial statements. See Note 2.

On March 27, 2020, the Company and Banner Parent, entered into the Banner Purchase Agreement to acquire Banner Midstream. Pursuant to the acquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and Banner Parent received shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Banner Midstream.

 

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810Consolidation of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—are consolidated except when control does not rest with the parent. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8, the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

 

Noncontrolling InterestsReclassifications

In accordance with ASC 810-10-45Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements,the Company classifies noncontrolling interests as a component of equity within the consolidated balance sheet. In September 2016, the 35% noncontrolling interest of Eco3d was acquired in exchange for 525 shares of Ecoark Holdings stock which eliminated the noncontrolling interest. On April 14, 2017, the Company sold the assets, liabilities and membership interests in Eco3d, and the 525 shares of Ecoark Holdings were returned as part of the sales proceeds and were subsequently canceled. 

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or the “SEC”). It is management’s opinion that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation.

Reclassification

 

The Company has reclassified certain amounts in the fiscal 2018March 31, 2020 consolidated financial statements to complybe consistent with the 2019March 31, 2021 presentation. These principally relate to classification of certain revenues, cost of revenues and related segment data, as well as certain research and development expenses. Reclassifications relating to the discontinued operations of Eco3d, Pioneer, Sable and Magnolia are described further in Note 2. The Company reclassified certain items in inventory of Zest Labs to property and equipment to reflect the transition to the Software as a Service (“SaaS”) model. The reclassifications had no impact on total net loss or net cash flows for the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 2018. However, restatements described further in Note 3 did impact fiscal 2018 reported amounts. 2020.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, management’s estimate of provisions required for uncollectible accounts receivable, fair value of assets held for sale and assets and liabilities acquired, impaired value of equipment and intangible assets, including goodwill, asset retirement obligations, estimates of discount rates in lease, liabilities to accrue, fair value of derivative liabilities associated with warrants, cost incurred in the satisfaction of performance obligations, permanent and temporary differences related to income taxes and determination of the fair value of stock awards.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The estimates of proved, probable and possible oil and gas reserves are used as significant inputs in determining the depletion of oil and gas properties and the impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proven, probable and possible reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. Similarly, evaluations for impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties are subject to numerous uncertainties including, among others, estimates of future recoverable reserves and commodity price outlooks. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions utilized.

 

Cash

Cash consists of cash, demand depositsOil and money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less. The Company holds no cash equivalents as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company maintains cash balances in excess of the FDIC insured limit. The Company does not consider this risk to be material. 

InventoryGas Properties

 

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventory cost is determined on average cost and at standard cost, which approximates average costs in accordance with ASC 330-10-30-12. Provisions are made to reduce slow-moving, obsolete, or unusable inventories to their estimated useful or scrap values. The Company establishesuses the full cost method of accounting for its investment in oil and natural gas properties. Under the full cost method of accounting, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including directly related overhead costs are capitalized. General and administrative costs related to production and general overhead are expensed as incurred.

All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized on the unit of production method using estimates of proved reserves. Disposition of oil and gas properties are accounted for this purpose. Asas a reduction of March 31, 2018,capitalized costs, with no gain or loss recognized unless such adjustment would significantly alter the inventoryrelationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of Sable has been includedoil and gas, in assets held for sale as more fully described on Note 2. Effective April 1, 2017,which case the Company changed its inventory costing method at Sable from first-in first-out (“FIFO”) to average cost. FIFO costs approximated average cost. The change was madegain or loss is recognized in conjunctionoperations. Unproved properties and development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with a system conversion that enabled the Company to move from a periodic to a perpetual inventory system. In accordance with ASC 250-10-45-11 through 45-13, managementprojects can be determined or until impairment occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the change was preferable because it provides better operational control and visibility into inventory levels and costs, and it facilitates cost analysis at a batch level that was not available previously. The effectproperties are impaired, the amount of the changeloss from operations before income taxes and the adjusted carrying amount of the unproved properties is amortized on the unit-of-production method.

There was not material to$869 and $0 in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense for the Company’s consolidated financial statementsoil and gas properties for the periodyears ended March 31, 2018. As of March 31, 2018, the inventory of Zest Labs consisting of tags, readers, antenna, etc. has been reclassified to property2021 and equipment to reflect the use of the assets in the SaaS revenue model.2020, respectively.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

Property and Equipment and Long-Lived AssetsLimitation on Capitalized Costs

 

PropertyUnder the full-cost method of accounting, we are required, at the end of each reporting period, to perform a test to determine the limit on the book value of our oil and equipmentgas properties (the “Ceiling” test). If the capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties, net of accumulated amortization and related deferred income taxes, exceed the Ceiling, the excess or impairment is statedcharged to expense. The expense may not be reversed in future periods, even though higher oil and gas prices may subsequently increase the Ceiling. The Ceiling is defined as the sum of: (a) the present value, discounted at cost. Depreciation on property10% and equipmentassuming continuation of existing economic conditions, of (1) estimated future gross revenues from proved reserves, which is computed using oil and gas prices determined as the straight-line method over the estimated useful livesunweighted arithmetic average of the assets, which range from twofirst-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month hedging arrangements pursuant to ten years for all classes of property and equipment, except leasehold improvements which are depreciated over the term of the lease, which is shorter than theSAB 103, less (2) estimated useful life of the improvements. 

ASC 360 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company has early adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2017-04Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment effective April 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impactfuture expenditures (based on our consolidated financial statements.

The Company reviews recoverability of long-lived assets on a periodic basis whenever events and changes in circumstances have occurred which may indicate a possible impairment. The assessment for potential impairment is based primarily on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of its long-lived assets from expected future cash flows from its operations on an undiscounted basis. If such assets are determinedcurrent costs) to be impaired,incurred in developing and producing the impairment recognized isproved reserves; plus, (b) the amount by whichcost of properties being amortized; plus, (c) the carrying valuelower of the assets exceeds thecost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the assets.costs being amortized; net of (d) the related tax effects related to the difference between the book and tax basis of our oil and natural gas properties. A ceiling test was performed as of March 31, 2021 and there was no indication of impairment on the oil and gas properties.

Oil and Gas Reserves

 

ASC 360-10 addresses criteriaReserve engineering is a subjective process that is dependent upon the quality of available data and interpretation thereof, including evaluations and extrapolations of well flow rates and reservoir pressure. Estimates by different engineers often vary sometimes significantly. In addition, physical factors such as results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of an estimate, as well as economic factors such as changes in product prices, may justify revision of such estimates. Because proved reserves are required to be considered for long-lived assets expected toestimated using recent prices of the evaluation, estimated reserve quantities can be disposedsignificantly impacted by changes in product prices.

Joint Interest Activities

Certain of by sale. Six criteriaour exploration, development and production activities are listedconducted jointly with other entities and, accordingly, the consolidated financial statements reflect only our proportionate interest in ASC 360-10-45-9 that must be met in order for assets to be classified as held for sale. Once the criteriasuch activities.

Inventories

Crude oil, products and merchandise inventories are met, long-lived assets classified as held for sale are to be measuredcarried at the lower of carrying amountcost (last-in-first-out (LIFO)) or fair value lessnet realizable value. Inventory costs include expenditures and other charges directly and indirectly incurred in bringing the inventory to sell. The Company did consider it necessary to record impairment charges for equipment acquired as part of the Sable acquisition. As of March 31, 2019its existing condition and 2018, the property and equipment of Sable and Magnolia Solar have been reclassified as assets held for sale as more fully described in Note 2.location.

 

Intangible assets with definite useful lives are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment. Intangible assets capitalized as of March 31, 2019 and 2018Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation

Asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) primarily represent the valuation of the Company-owned patents, outsourced vendor relationships and non-compete agreements. These intangible assets were being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated average useful lives of thirteen and a half years for the patents, three years for outsourced vendor relationships and two years for non-compete agreements. Expenditures on intangible assets through the Company’s filing of patent and trademark protection for Company-owned inventions are expensed as incurred. 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

The Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

1. Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;

2. Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and

3. Significant negative industry or economic trends.

When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carryingpresent value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows,amount the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on awill incur to plug, abandon and remediate its producing properties at the projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicatorend of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows. The Company tested the carrying value of its long-lived assets for recoverability during the year ended March 31, 2019, and impairments were recorded during this period.

Advertising Expense 

The Company expenses advertising costs, as incurred. Advertising expenses for the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, which were nominal, are included in other general and administrative costs.

Software Costs 

The Company accounts for software development coststheir productive lives, in accordance with ASC 985-730 Software Researchapplicable federal, state and Development, and ASC 985-20Costslocal laws. The Company determined its ARO by calculating the present value of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed. ASC 985-20 requires that coststhe estimated cash flows related to the developmentobligation. The retirement obligation is recorded as a liability at its estimated present value as of the Company’s productsbe capitalized asobligation’s inception, with an asset when incurred subsequentoffsetting increase to the point at which technological feasibility of the enhancement is established and priorproved properties or to when a product is available for general release to customers. ASC 985-20 specifies that technological feasibility can be established by the completion of a detailed program design. Costs incurred prior to achieving technological feasibility are expensed. The Company does utilize detailed program designs; however, the Company’s products are released soon after technological feasibility has been established and as a result software development costs have been expensed as incurred.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These costs include internal salaries and related costs and professional fees for activities related to development. These costs relate to the Zest Data Services platform, Zest Fresh and Zest Delivery.

Subsequent Events 

Subsequent events were evaluated through the date the consolidated financial statements were filed.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company reports shipping and handling revenues and their associated costs in revenue and cost of revenue, respectively. Shipping revenues and costs for the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, were nominal and included in cost of product sales.exploration costs.

 

Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with CustoCustomersmers, which the Company early adopted effective April 1, 2017. No cumulative adjustment to accumulated deficit was required as a result of this adoption, and the early adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements as no material arrangements prior to the adoption were impacted under the new pronouncement..

 

The Company accounts for a contract when it has been approved and committed to, each party’s rights regarding the goods or services to be transferred have been identified, the payment terms have been identified, the contract has commercial substance, and collectability is probable. Revenue is generally recognized net of allowances for returns and any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the fair value for each of the elements.

 

Revenue from software license agreements of Zest Labs is recognized over time or at a point in time depending on the evaluation of when the customer obtains control of the promised goods or services over the term of the agreement. For agreements where the software requires continuous updates to provide the intended functionality, revenue is recognized over the term of the agreement. For software as a service (“SaaS”) contracts that include multiple performance obligations, including hardware, perpetual software licenses, subscriptions, term licenses, maintenance and other services, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on estimates of the price that would be charged to the customer for each promised product or service if it were sold on a standalone basis. For contracts for new products and services where standalone pricing has not been established, the Company allocates revenue to each performance obligation based on estimates using the adjusted market assessment approach, the expected cost plus a margin approach or the residual approach as appropriate under the circumstances. Contracts are typically on thirty-day payment terms from when the Company satisfies the performance obligation in the contract. In fiscal 2019, theThe Company did not have significantmaterial revenue from software license agreements.agreements in the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Revenue under master service agreements is recorded upon the performance obligation being satisfied. Typically, the satisfaction of the performance obligation occurs upon the frac sand load being delivered to the customer site and this load being successfully invoiced and accepted by the Company’s factoring agent.

The Company recognizes revenue under ASC 606 for their proportionate share of revenue when: (i) the Company receives notification of the successful sale of a load of crude oil to a buyer; (ii) the buyer will provide a price based on the average monthly price of crude oil in the most recent month; and (iii) cash is received the following month from the crude oil buyer.

 

The Company accounts for contract costs in accordance with ASC Topic 340-40,Contracts with Customers. The Company recognizes the cost of sales of a contract as expense when incurred or at the time a performance obligation is satisfied. The Company recognizes an asset from the costs to fulfillfulfil a contract only if the costs relate directly to a contract, the costs generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying a performance obligation in the future and the costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are capitalized unless the costs would have been incurred regardless of whether the contract was obtained.

 

Revenue Recognition – Discontinued Operations

ProductCost of sales for Pinnacle Frac includes all direct expenses incurred to produce the revenue for discontinued operations whichthe period. This includes, but is netted in loss from discontinued operations consists primarily of the sale of recycled plastics products by Pioneernot limited to, direct employee labor, direct contract labor and Sable. Contracts for products are for products held in inventory and typically are on thirty-day payment terms. Management’s evaluation of credit risk involves judgement and may include securing insurance coverage on the recoverability of the receivables. Revenues are recognized when obligations under the terms of a contract with the customer are satisfied and when control of the promised goods are transferred to the customer, typically when products are shipped to the customer. Expected costs of standard warranties and claims are recognized as expense.

For discontinued operations of Magnolia Solar, services contracts include research contracts for the government. The contracts define delivery dates for which the performance obligation will be satisfied over time. Revenue is recognized over time based on the output method to measure the Company’s progress toward complete satisfaction of a performance obligation.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019fuel.

 

Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company considers accounts receivable, net of allowance for returns and doubtful accounts, to be fully collectible. The allowance is based on management’s estimate of the overall collectability of accounts receivable, considering historical losses, credit insurance and economic conditions. Based on these same factors, individual accounts are charged off against the allowance when management determines those individual accounts are uncollectible. Credit extended to customers is generally uncollateralized, however credit insurance is obtained for some customers. Past-due status is based on contractual terms.


 

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company follows ASC 740-10Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This requires recognition and measurement of uncertain income tax positions using a “more-likely-than-not” approach. Management evaluates their tax positions on an annual basis.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal tax jurisdiction and various state tax jurisdictions. The federal and state income tax returns of the Company are subject to examination by the IRS and state taxing authorities, generally for three years after they were filed.

Vacation and Paid-Time-Off Compensation

The Company follows ASC 710-10Compensation – General. The Company records liabilities and expense when obligations are attributable to services already rendered, will be paid even if an employee is terminated, payment is probable, and the amount can be estimated.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company follows ASC 718 Compensation – Stock Compensation and has early adopted ASU 2017-09Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting as of July 1, 2017. The Company calculates compensation expense for all awards granted, but not yet vested, based on the grant-date fair values. Share-based compensation expense for all awards granted is based on the grant-date fair values. The Company recognizes these compensation costs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, on a pro rata basis over the requisite service period of each vesting tranche of each award. The Company considers voluntary termination behavior as well as trends of actual option forfeitures when estimating the forfeiture rate. The Company facilitates payment of the employee tax withholdings resulting from the issuances of these awards by remitting the employee taxes and recovering the resulting amounts due from the employee either via payments from employees or from the sale of shares issued sufficient to cover the amounts due the Company.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

For Pinnacle Frac, accounts receivable is comprised of unsecured amounts due from customers that have been conveyed to a factoring agent without recourse. Pinnacle Frac receives an advance from the factoring agent of 98% of the amount invoiced to the customer within one business day. The Company measures compensationrecognizes revenue for 100% of the gross amount invoiced, records an expense for its non-employee share-based compensation under ASC 505-50Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. The fair value of the options2% finance charge by the factoring agent, and shares issued is used to measurerealizes cash for the transactions, as this is more reliable than the fair value of the services98% net proceeds received. The fair value is measured at the valueCompany has recognized an allowance for doubtful accounts of the Company’s common stock on the date that the commitment for performance by the counterparty has been reached or the counterparty’s performance is complete. The fair value$709 and $500 as of the equity instrument is charged directly to expense, or to a prepaid expense if shares of common stock are issued in advance of services being rendered,March 31, 2021 and additional paid-in capital.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-09Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting effective April 1, 2017. Cash paid when shares were directly withheld for tax withholding purposes is classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. There were no other impacts from this adoption.2020, respectively.

 

Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsMeasurements

ASC 825820 Financial InstrumentsFair Value Measurements requires the Company to disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments: The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and amounts payable to related parties, approximatedefines fair value, because ofestablishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the short-term maturity of those instruments. The Company doesfollowing hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not utilize derivative instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s debt instruments also approximates fair value.active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

 

LeasesSegment Information

 

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 840280-10 LeasesSegment Reporting. This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in accounting for leased properties.which management disaggregates the Company in making internal operating decisions. The Company leases office and production facilities for terms typically ranging from three to five years. Rent escalations over the term of a lease are considered at the inception of the lease suchits chief operating decision makers determined that the monthly average for all payments is recorded as straight-line rent expenseCompany’s operations effective with any differences recorded in accrued liabilities. As subsequently described, the Company is adopting ASC 842Leases forMay 31, 2019, acquisition of Trend Holdings and the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2019.

Earnings (Loss) Per ShareMarch 27, 2020 acquisition of Common Stock

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average numberBanner Midstream now consist of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) include additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as convertible notes, preferred stock, stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock optionsthree segments, Financial, Commodities and warrants. Common stock equivalents are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share when the Company reports a loss because to do so would be anti-dilutive for periods presented, so only basic weighted average number of common shares are used in the computations.Technology.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. Management evaluates all of the Company’s financial instruments, including warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. The Company generally uses a Black-Scholes model, as applicable, to value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates when needed. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is remeasured at the end of each reporting period. The Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of the derivative liabilities. Applying this accounting policy resulted in restatements of prior periods as more fully described in Note 3.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820Fair Value Measurements defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820 classifies these inputs into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 inputs: Instruments with primarily unobservable value drivers.

Segment Information

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10Segment Reporting.This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which management disaggregates the Company in making internal operating decisions. As a result of Sable, Pioneer and Magnolia Solar being classified as discontinued operations, the Company and its Chief Operating Decision Makers determined that the Company’s operations now consist of only one segment, Zest Labs.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 2019

2021

Related-Party Transactions

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal stockholders of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal stockholders of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal where one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all material related-party transactions (see Note 12). All transactions shall be recorded at fair value of the goods or services exchanged. Property purchased from a related party is recorded at the cost to the related party and any payment to or on behalf of the related party in excess of the cost is reflected as compensation or distribution to related parties depending on the transaction.

Recently AdoptedIssued Accounting PronouncementsStandards

 

In May 2014, August 2015 and May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09Revenue from Contracts with Customers, ASU 2015-14Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Deferral of the Effective Date, and ASU 2016-12Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, respectively, which implement ASC Topic 606. ASU 2017-13 issued in September 2017 clarifies SEC Staff guidance on the transition to ASC 606. ASC Topic 606 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP, including industry-specific guidance. It also requires entities to disclose both quantitative and qualitative information that enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The amendments in these ASUs are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. These ASUs may be applied retrospectively with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings in the year of adoption. The Company adopted the above ASUs (ASC Topic 606) effective April 1, 2017. The adoption of these ASUs did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. The FASB issued this update to provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments in this update are required for all entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 as of July 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.The amendments in this update are required for public business entities that have goodwill reported in their financial statements and have not elected the private company alternative for the subsequent measurement of goodwill. The update is intended to simplify the annual or interim goodwill impairment test. A public business entity that is a U.S. SEC filer must adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2017-04 effective April 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business.The amendments in this update are required for public business entities that have goodwill reported in their financial statements and have not elected the private company alternative for the subsequent measurement of goodwill. The update is intended to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. Public business entities must apply the amendments in this update to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application is permitted under certain conditions. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 effective April 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in this update provided guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. This update provided specific guidance on each of the eight issues, thereby reducing the diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 effective April 1, 2017. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

The Company adopted ASU 2016-09Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting effective April 1, 2017. Cash paid when shares were directly withheld for tax withholding purposes is classified as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows. There were no other impacts from this adoption.

In July 2017,2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-11No. 2020-06, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40), EarningsAccounting for Convertible Instruments and Contract’s in an Entity’s Own Equity. The ASU simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, which will permit more equity contracts to qualify for it. The ASU simplifies the diluted net income per share calculation in certain areas. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2021, and early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2021-04 “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from EquityDebt—Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation— Stock Compensation (Topic 480)718), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I.Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815- 40) Issuer’s Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down RoundsModifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options” which clarifies and II. Replacementreduces diversity in an issuer’s accounting for modifications or exchanges of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception.This ASU changes the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. When determining whether certain financial instrumentsfreestanding equity-classified written call options (for example, warrants) that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. An entity should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. The amendments also require entities to recognizemeasure the effect of a modification or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option that remains equity classified after modification or exchange as follows: i) for a modification or an exchange that is a part of or directly related to a modification or an exchange of an existing debt instrument or line-of-credit or revolving-debt arrangements (hereinafter, referred to as a “debt” or “debt instrument”), as the down round feature on earnings per share whendifference between the fair value of the modified or exchanged written call option and the fair value of that written call option immediately before it is triggered. ASU 2017-11 should be adopted retrospectivelymodified or exchanged; ii) for all other modifications or exchanges, as a cumulative-effect adjustment asthe excess, if any, of the date of adoption, only to financial instruments outstanding asfair value of the initial application date. ASU 2017-11 will bemodified or exchanged written call option over the fair value of that written call option immediately before it is modified or exchanged. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018, which will be the Company’sall entities for fiscal year 2020 (beginning April 1, 2019). Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. Prior to the adoption of this guidance the issuance of equity instruments with a down round feature would have had an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 and later updated with ASU 2019-01 in March 2019Leases (Topic 842).The ASU’s change the accounting for leased assets, principally by requiring balance sheet recognition of assets under lease arrangements. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018. On adoption, the Company currently expects torecognize additional operating liabilities of approximately $121, with corresponding right of use assets of $112 based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under leasing standards for existing operating leases. 

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This ASU is intended to simplify aspects of share-based compensation issued to non-employees by making the guidance consistent accounting for employee share-based compensation. It is effective for annual reporting periods, and2021, including interim periods within those years, beginningfiscal years. An entity should apply the amendments prospectively to modifications or exchanges occurring on or after December 15, 2018.the effective date of the amendments. The Company does not expectis currently evaluating the impact to be material given the current nonemployee share-based grants outstanding.

There were other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected to have a material impactthis standard on the Company’sits consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Going Concern statements.

 

The Company has experienced losses fromdoes not discuss recent pronouncements that are not anticipated to have an impact on or are unrelated to its financial condition, results of operations, resulting in an accumulated deficit of $115,886 since inception. The accumulated deficit as well as recurring losses of $13,650 and $32,836 forcash flows or disclosures.

Liquidity

For the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, the Company had a net loss of $20,888 and $12,137, respectively, cash used in operating activities in fiscal 2019 and 2018 were $9,040 and $17,643, respectively, and negativehas a working capital deficit of $5,045$11,845 and $16,689 as of March 31, 2019, have resulted2021 and 2020, and has an accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2021 of $148,911. As of March 31, 2021, the Company has $1,316 in cash and cash equivalents. The Company alleviated the substantial doubt regarding this uncertainty as of March 31, 2020 which continues to be alleviated at March 31, 2021 as a result of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

These consolidated financial statementsacquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020 which bring revenue generating subsidiaries with reserves of oil properties over $6,000 and existing customer relationships over $2,000, coupled with the Company have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realizationraising of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities$16,119 in the normal courseexercise of business overwarrants, $502 in the exercise of options and $7,666 in a reasonable periodregistered direct offering, net of time. 

The Company raised additional capital through the issuancefees of common stock (net of fees), in private placements, issuances under equity purchase agreements and sales of convertible notes of $4,221 and $12,693$334 in the year ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (see Note 13). In addition, the Company has secured a $10,000 credit facility (see Note 10), and it has effected a merger with Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc. on May 31, 2019 (see Note 19). The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through future equity and debt securities issuances and funding from the credit facility and Trend Discovery is not assured. Obtaining additional financing and the successful development of the Company’s strategic plan to achieve profitability are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of the uncertainties.

As more fully described in Note 3, in connection with the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal ended March 31, 2019, the Company identified inadvertent errors in the accounting for certain embedded derivative liabilities associated with warrants issued as a part of capital raises in 2017 and 2018. In connection with those capital raises, proceeds (net of fees) were accounted for as equity. Upon further evaluation, the Company determined that a portion of the capital raised should have been accounted for as liabilities with fair value changes recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.2021.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

If the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities, its stockholders would experience dilution. Additional debt financing, if available, may involve covenants restricting its operations or its ability to incur additional debt. Any additional debt financing or additional equity that the Company raises may contain terms that are not favorable to it or its stockholders and require significant debt service payments, which diverts resources from other activities. If the Company is unable to obtain additional financing, it may be required to significantly scale back its business and operations. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital will be impacted by the heightened societal and regulatory focus on climate change and may also be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Company believes that the current cash on hand and anticipated cash from operations is sufficient to conduct planned operations for one year from the issuance of the consolidated financial statements.

Impact of COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound effect on the U.S. and global economy and may continue to affect the economy and the industries in which we operate, depending on the vaccine rollouts and the emergence of virus mutations.

COVID-19 did not have a material effect on the Consolidated Statements of Operations or the Consolidated Balance Sheets included in this Form 10-K. However, it did have a material impact on our management’s ability to operate effectively. The impact included the difficulties of working remotely from home including slow Internet connection, the inability of our accounting and financial officers to collaborate as effectively as they would otherwise have in an office environment and issues arising from mandatory state quarantines.

While it is not possible at this time to estimate with sufficient certainty the continued impact that COVID-19 could have on the Company’s business, future outbreaks and the measures taken by federal, state, local and foreign governments could disrupt the operation of the Company’s business. The COVID-19 outbreak and mitigation measures have also had and may continue to have an adverse impact on global and domestic economic conditions, including the reducing demand for oil, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition, including on its potential to conduct financings on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. In addition, the Company has taken temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of the virus to its employees, including temporarily requiring employees to work remotely, and discouraging employee attendance at in-person work-related meetings, which could negatively affect the Company’s business. The extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak may impact the Company’s results will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information that may emerge concerning the severity of the virus and the actions to contain its impact.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) includes, among other things, provisions relating to payroll tax credits and deferrals, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credits and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property. The CARES Act also established a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), whereby certain small business are eligible for a loan to fund payroll expenses, rent and related costs. We had received funding under the PPP, and a majority of that as indicated in our Consolidated Statement of Operations has been forgiven.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

In April 2020, the Company and one of its subsidiaries entered into PPP loans with financial institutions, Of the $1,869 in PPP loans obtained this fiscal year, the Company was informed that $1,850 (including $11 in accrued interest) has been forgiven in the three months ended December 31, 2020. The remaining $30 with accrued interest of $2 was converted into a loan that is due in May 2022, with payments of $2 per month that commenced December 19, 2020.

 

NOTE 2: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

On April 14, 2017,Pursuant to ASC 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements – Discontinued Operations, ASC-20-45-1B, paragraph 360-10-45-15, Pinnacle Vac will be disposed of other than by sale via an abandonment and termination of operations with no intent to classify the Company soldentity or assets as Available for Sale. Pursuant to ASC 205-20-45-3A, the assets, liabilities and membership interests in Eco3dresults of operations of Pinnacle Vac from inception to discontinuation of operations will be reclassified to a group led by executivesseparate component of Eco3d after the Company’s Board concluded that Eco3d did not fit the future strategic directionincome, below Net Income/(Loss), as a Loss on Discontinued Operations.

All of the Company.equipment assets of Pinnacle Vac and the related loan liabilities will be subsequently transitioned into Capstone to continue servicing the debt. The Company received $2,029 in cash and 560 sharesremaining current assets of Pinnacle Vac will be used to settle any outstanding current liabilities of Pinnacle Vac. A loss contingency will be recorded if any of the Company’s common stock (including 525 shares that had been exchanged for the noncontrolling interest in September 2016) that was held by executivesoutstanding liabilities or obligations of Eco3d, which were canceled upon receipt. There willPinnacle Vac resulting from this abandonment are reasonably estimable and likely to be no significant continuing involvement with Eco3d.incurred.

 

On March 12, 2019,Banner Midstream made the Company solddecision to discontinue the inventoryoperations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Pinnacle Vac Service LLC (“Pinnacle Vac”), effective October 31, 2018 due to the inability of Pinnacle Vac’s management to develop a sustainable, profitable business model. The managerial staff of Pinnacle Vac was terminated on November 15, 2018 and property and equipment of Sable to a buyer for cash and a short-term receivable. There will be no significant continuing involvement with Sable.Pinnacle Vac’s rental facility at Sligo Rd. was vacated on November 15, 2018.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

 

In addition, as a result of receiving letters of intent for the sale of key assets of Pioneer and Magnolia Solar, and the approval by the Company’s Board to sell the assets, those assets are included in assets held for sale and their operations included in discontinued operations.

Carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale and included as part of discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheetssheet as of March 31, 2021 for Pinnacle Vac consisted of the following as of March 31: 

following:

 

  2019  2018 
Inventory $-  $611 
Other current assets  23   34 
Current assets – held for sale $23  $645 
         
Property and equipment, net $-  $995 
Other assets  -   28 
Non-current assets – held for sale $-  $1,023 
         
Accounts payable $23  $30 
Accrued liabilities  11   13 
Current liabilities – held for sale $34  $43 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

Current asset   
Cash $- 
Total current assets $- 
     
Property and equipment, net $194 
Non-current assets $194 
     
Accounts payable $9 
Current liabilities $9 

 

Major line items constitutingThere was no income (loss) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended March 31, consisted2021 and 2020, respectively. During 2021, the Company traded in a vehicle for a new right of use asset for Pinnacle Frac for $55. In addition, the Company paid off a majority of the following:

  2019  2018 
Revenue $9,883  $9,541 
Cost of revenue  10,515   10,567 
Gross (loss)  (632)  (1,026)
Operating expenses  1,668   3,155 
Loss from discontinued operations $(2,300) $(4,181)
Non-cash expenses $452  $2,223 

accounts payable with only $9 remaining.

 

After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has recorded a full valuation allowance due to the uncertainty of realizing income tax benefit for all periods presented, and the income tax provision for all periods presented was considered immaterial. Thus, no separate tax provision or benefit relating to discontinued operations is included here or on the face of the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Non-cash expenses above consist principally of depreciation, amortization and impairment costs. Capital expenditures of discontinued operations were principally at Sable and amounted to $268 and $253 for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Gain on the sale of Sable assets of $57 in March 2019 and on the sale of Eco3d of $636 in May 2017 was recognized in discontinued operations.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

NOTE 3: RESTATEMENTS

In connection with the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019, the Company identified inadvertent errors in the accounting for certain embedded derivative liabilities associated with warrants issued as a part of capital raises in 2017 and 2018. In connection with those capital raises, proceeds (net of fees) were accounted for as equity. Upon further evaluation, the Company determined that a portion of the capital raised should have been accounted for as liabilities with fair value changes recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Accordingly, the Company is restating herein its previously issued consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 and interim periods in fiscal years 2018 and 2019 as well as an adjustment to the opening balance sheet for the first interim period of fiscal 2018 (the “Restated Periods”). The adjustment to the opening balance sheet as of April 1, 2017 consisted of establishing a current derivatives liability of $3,351, offset by a reduction in additional paid-in-capital of $4,180 and a reduction of accumulated deficit of $829.

The categories of misstatements and their impact on previously reported consolidated financial statements for the 2018 and 2017 annual periods are described below:

Derivative Liability:The recognition, measurement and presentation and disclosure related to the warrants issued in conjunction with reserved private placements of the Company’s common stock.

Stockholders’ Deficit:The measurement and presentation and disclosure related to the derivative liability associated with the warrants issued in conjunction with the reserved private placements originally classified as additional paid in capital.

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities:The recognition, measurement and presentation and disclosure related to changes in the fair value of the derivative liability

In addition to the restatement of the financial statements, certain information within the following notes to the financial statements have been restated to reflect the corrections of misstatements discussed above as well as to add disclosure language as appropriate:

Note 1: Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 9: Warrant Derivative Liabilities

Note 13: Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Note 18: Fair Value Measurements

The financial statement misstatements reflected in previously issued consolidated financial statements did not impact cash flows from operations, investing, or financing activities in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows for any period previously presented, however they did impact individual line items.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

Comparison of restated financial statements to financial statements as previously reported

The following tables compare the Company’s previously issued Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statement of Cashflows, and Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity as of and for the year ended March 31, 2018 to the corresponding restated consolidated financial statements for that year.

     (Dollars in thousands, 
     except per share data) 
  March 31,  Restatement  March 31, 
  2018  Adjustment  2018 
  As Reported     As Restated 
ASSETS         
CURRENT ASSETS         
Cash ($265 pledged as collateral for credit) $3,730  $-  $3,730 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $87  2,617   -   2,617 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  242   -   242 
Current assets held for sale  645   -   645 
Total current assets  7,234   -   7,234 
NON-CURRENT ASSETS            
Property and equipment, net  2,619   -   2,619 
Intangible assets, net  1,545   -   1,545 
Non-current assets held for sale  1,023   -   1,023 
Other assets  26   -   26 
Total non-current assets  5,213   -   5,213 
TOTAL ASSETS $12,447   -  $12,447 
             
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)            
             
CURRENT LIABILITIES            
Accounts payable $2,350  $-  $2,350 
Accrued liabilities  1,080   -   1,080 
Derivative liabilities  -   3,694   3,694 
Current portion of long-term debt  500   -   500 
Current liabilities held for sale  43   -   43 
Total current liabilities  3,973   3,694   7,667 
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES            
Long-term debt, net of current portion  -   -   - 
Long-term debt, net of current portion - related party  -   -     
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES            
Total liabilities  3,973   3,694   7,667 
             
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Numbers of shares rounded to thousands)            
             
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized; none issued  -   -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 49,468 shares issued and 48,923 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2018  49   -   49 
Additional paid-in-capital  122,424   (13,839)  108,585 
Accumulated deficit  (112,381)  10,145   (102,236)
Treasury stock, at cost  (1,618)  -   (1,618)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  8,474   (3,694)  4,780 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) $12,447   -  $12,447 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

  Year Ended     Year Ended 
  March 31,  Restatement  March 31, 
  2018  Adjustment  2018 
  As
Reported
     As
Restated
 
CONTINUING OPERATIONS:         
          
REVENUES $558  $-  $558 
             
COST OF REVENUES  243   -   243 
             
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)  315   -   315 
OPERATING EXPENSES:            
Salaries and salary related costs, including share-based compensation  25,962   -   25,962 
Professional fees and consulting, including share-based compensation  4,812       4,812 
Selling, general and administrative  1,677   -   1,677 
Depreciation, amortization, and impairment  818   -   818 
Research and development  5,576   -   5,576 
Total operating expenses  38,845   -   38,845 
Loss from continuing operations before other expenses  (38,530)  -   (38,530)
             
OTHER EXPENSE:            
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  -   9,316   9,316 
Interest expense, net of interest income  (55)  -   (55)
Total other expenses  (55)  9,316   9,261 
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  (38,585)  9,316   (29,269)
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:            
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (4,181)  -   (4,181)
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations  636   -   636 
Total discontinued operations  (3,545)  -   (3,545)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  22   -   22 
NET LOSS  (42,152)  9,316   (32,836)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST  -       - 
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONTROLLING INTEREST $(42,152) $9,316  $(32,836)
             
NET LOSS PER SHARE            
Basic and diluted: Continuing operations $(0.85) $(0.21) $(0.64)
Discontinued operations $(0.08)  -  $(0.08)
Total $(0.93) $0.21  $(0.72)
             
SHARES USED IN CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE            
Basic and diluted  45,500       45,500 

F-21

 ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

  Year Ended
March 31,
 Restatement Year Ended
March 31,
  2018 Adjustment 2018
  As Reported   As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net loss attributable to controlling interest $(42,152) $9,316  $(32,836)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:            
Depreciation, amortization and impairment  3,041   -     3,041 
Shares of common stock issued for services rendered  2,860   -     2,860 
Share-based compensation – stock - employees  20,592   -     20,592 
Share-based compensation due to employment agreements  1,500   -     1,500 
Change in value of derivative liabilities      (9,316)  (9,316)
(Income) loss from discontinued operations  4,181       4,181 
Gain on sale of discontinued operations  (636)  -     (636)
Loss on retirement of assets  61   -     61 
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Accounts receivable  (1,060)  -     (1,060)
Inventory  (983)  -     (983)
Prepaid expenses  90   -     90 
Other current assets  (56)  -     (56)
Other assets  6   -     6 
Accounts payable  634   -     634 
Accrued liabilities  (1,691)  -     (1,691)
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations  (13,613)  -     13,613)
Net cash used in discontinued operations  (4,030)  -     (4,030)
Net cash used in operating activities  (17,643)  -     (17,643)
             
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Proceeds from sale of Eco3d  2,029   -     2,029 
Purchases of short-term investments  (1,001)  -     (1,001)
Redemption of short-term investments  1,001   -     1,001 
Purchases of property and equipment  (277)  -     (277)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  1,752   -     1,752 
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of fees  12,693   -     12,693 
Purchase of treasury shares from employees  (1,618)  -     (1,618)
Repayments of debt - related parties  (100)  -     (100)
Net cash provided by financing activities  10,975   -     10,975 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH  (4,916)  -     (4,916)
Cash - beginning of period  8,646   -     8,646 
Cash - end of period $3,730  $-    $3,730 
             
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:            
Cash paid for interest $60  $-    $60 
Cash paid for income taxes $-    $-    $-   
             
SUMMARY OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:            
Inventory reclassified to property and equipment $2,477  $-    $2,477 
             
Assets and liabilities acquired via acquisition of companies:            
Identifiable intangible assets $1,435  $-    $1,435 
Goodwill $65  $-    $65 
Other assets $28  $-    $28 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

The Company’s financial statements as of March 31, 2017, contained the following adjustments: (1) overstatement of additional-paid-in-capital by $4,180, (2) understatement of warrant liability by $3,351, and (3) overstatement of net loss due to change in fair value of warrant liability by $829. Accumulated deficit as of April 1, 2017, has been reduced by $4,180 to correct the aggregate effect of the adjustments, net of their related income tax effect of $0. Had the errors not been made, net loss for fiscal 2017 would have been decreased by $829, net of income tax of $0 due to the Company having a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets. These adjustments were made to correct an error made in fiscal year 2017 of classifying certain warrants issued in May 2017 as a component of equity rather than as a liability at inception and changes in the fair value of the warrant liability not being recognized in the statement of operations.

  Preferred  Common  Additional
Paid-In-
  Accumulated  Treasury    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Stock  Total 
Balances at April 1, 2017 (Restated)  -  $-   42,330  $42  $80,845  $(69,400) $-  $11,487 
                                 
Shares issued for cash in private placement, net of expenses (Restated)  -   -   5,000   5   3,029   -   -   3,034 
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock – Board of Directors  -   -   201   -   550   -   -   550 
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock – services rendered  -   -   65   -   596   -   -   596 
                                 
Share-based compensation – stock – employees  -   -   1,783   2   20,590   -   -   20,592 
                                 
Purchase shares from employees in lieu of taxes  -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,618)  (1,618)
                                 
Stock issued to purchase 440 Labs  -   -   300   -   1,500   -   -   1,500 
                                 
Share-based compensation due to employment agreements  -   -   300   -   1,500   -   -   1,500 
                                 
Warrant conversion – cashless  -   -   49   -   -   -   -   - 
                                 
Sale of Eco3d, shares received and cancelled  -   -   (560)  -   (25)  -   -   (25)
                                 
Net loss for the period (Restated)  -   -   -   -   -   (32,836)  -   (32,836)
                                 
Balances at March 31, 2018 (Restated)  -   -   49,468   49   108,585   (102,236)  (1,618)  4,780 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

NOTE 4: REVENUE

The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which the Company early adopted effective April 1, 2017. No cumulative adjustment to accumulated deficit was required, and the early adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, as no material arrangements prior to the adoption were impacted by the new pronouncement.

 

The following table disaggregates the Company’s revenue by major source for the years ended March 31:31, 2021 and 2020:

 

  2019  2018 
Revenue:      
Walmart $1,000  $500 
Software as a Service (“SaaS”)  62   57 
Hardware Sales  -   1 
  $1,062  $558 

  Years Ended
March 31,
 
  2021  2020 
Revenue:      
Software as a Service (“SaaS”) $-  $28 
Professional Services  -   145 
Financial Services  478   175 
Oil and Gas Production  2,363   - 
Transportation Services  12,318   225 
Fuel Rebate  245   4 
Equipment Rental  159   4 
  $15,563  $581 

 

Revenues in the year ended March 31, 2019 were principally from a project with Walmart. After paying invoices for $1,000 through June, Walmart has not paid the final $500. As a result, the Company has established an allowance for doubtful accounts of $500 until the matter is resolved. Zest SaaS revenues in the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were from retailers and produce growers. There were no significant contract asset or contract liability balances for all periods presented. The Company does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less, and (ii) contracts for which we recognize revenue at the amount to which we have the right to invoice for services performed.

NOTE 5: MERGER

On January 29, 2016, Ecoark entered into a Merger Agreement (“Merger Agreement”) with MSC providing, among other things, for the acquisition of Ecoark by MSC in a share for share exchange pursuant to which it was contemplated that at the closing Ecoark shareholders would own approximately 95% of the outstanding shares of MSC. On March 18, 2016, in a special meeting called by MSC, the shareholders of MSC approved proposals necessary to complete the Merger (“Merger”).

On March 24, 2016, the Merger was closed. Upon the closing of the transaction, under the Merger Agreement, Magnolia Solar Acquisition Corporation merged with and into Ecoark with Ecoark as the surviving corporation, which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of MSC. Thereafter, MSC changed its name to Ecoark Holdings, Inc. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition; for accounting purposes Ecoark acquired the assets and liabilities of Magnolia Solar effective March 24, 2016. The historical financial information presented prior to March 24, 2016 is that of Ecoark.

Further, the Articles of Incorporation were amended to increase the authorized shares of common stock to 100,000 shares, to effect the creation of 5,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, and to approve a reverse stock split of the MSC common stock of 1 for 250. 

After the Merger, the Company had 29,057 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. MSC’s shareholders and holders of debt, notes, warrants and options received an aggregate of 1,351 shares of the Company’s common stock and Ecoark’s shareholders received an aggregate of 27,706 shares of the Company’s common stock.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

As a resultSubsequent to the acquisitions of Trend Discovery and Banner Midstream, the Company in 2020 recorded revenues for financial services and oil and gas services and production and transportation. For both of these entities, revenues are billed upon the completion of the Merger and in accordance with SAB Topic 14C and ASC 805-40-45, the Company has given retroactive effect to the transaction by adjusting the number of shares in the consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and accompanying notes. The retroactive treatment changed the reported common shares and additional paid-in capital in the balance sheets, the shares used in the calculation of net loss per share and resulting net loss per share in the statements of operations, the number of shares and related dollar amounts in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and various disclosures regarding number of shares and related amounts in these notes to consolidated financial statements. There was no effect on the net loss or total stockholders’ equity (deficit) as a resultperformance obligations.

Collections of the restatement.amounts billed are typically paid by the customers within 30 to 60 days.

NOTE 4: INVENTORIES

 

The change became effective onCompany’s inventory as of March 24, 2016 when31, 2021 of $122 consisted of crude oil of approximately 6,198 barrels of unsold crude oil using the Merger closed.lower of cost (LIFO) or net realizable value.

NOTE 5: NOTE RECEIVABLE

 

The financial statements presented herein forCompany entered into a $225 senior secured convertible promissory note on June 18, 2020 with Rabb Resources, LTD. The Company had an existing note in the period through March 24, 2016 representamount of $25 that had not been secured, and rolled an additional $200 into Rabb Resources, LTD, whereby the historical financial informationentire amount became secured. The note was non-interest bearing if paid or converted within forty-five days of Ecoark, Inc., except for the capital structureissuance date of June 18, 2020 (August 2, 2020, which is the maturity date). If not paid or converted, the note bore interest at 11% per annum, paid in cash on a quarterly basis.

This note was convertible into shares of Rabb Resources, LTD. based on a valuation of Rabb Resources, LTD. into shares of that company at a value of the $225. The Company advanced an additional $50 on July 8, 2020 and $25 on August 7, 2020 to bring the total note receivable to $300. This amount plus the accrued interest receivable of $4 was due as of DecemberAugust 14, 2020.

On August 14, 2020, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Rabb Resources, LTD. which included the acquisition of real property. The purchase price for this acquisition was $3,500, of which $1,196 was paid in cash (after applying the outstanding principal of the note receivable and accrued interest receivable against the $1,500 agreed upon cash consideration) and the balance was paid in common stock of the Company. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset purchase (see Note 16). There were no amounts outstanding as of March 31, 2015 which represents the historical amounts of MSC, retroactively adjusted to reflect the legal capital structure of MSC.2021.

 

NOTE 6: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of March 31:31, 2021 and 2020:

 

  2019  2018 
Zest Labs freshness hardware $2,493  $2,477 
Computers and software costs  222   400 
Machinery and equipment  200   211 
Furniture and fixtures  -   89 
Leasehold improvements  -   4 
Total property and equipment  2,915   3,181 
Accumulated depreciation and impairment  (2,091)  (562)
Property and equipment, net $824  $2,619 

  March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
Zest Labs freshness hardware $2,493  $2,493 
Computers and software costs  222   222 
Land  140   - 
Buildings  236   - 
Leasehold improvements – Pinnacle Frac  18   18 
Machinery and equipment - Technology  200   200 
Machinery and equipment – Commodities  3,385   3,405 
Total property and equipment  6,694   6,338 
Accumulated depreciation and impairment  (2,999)  (2,373)
Property and equipment, net $3,695  $3,965 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

As previously described, during the year ended March 31, 2018 Zest Labs entered into SaaS contracts with customers and $2,477 of assets previously classified as inventory have been reclassified to property and equipment. These assets will be used in the satisfaction of performance obligations to customers and depreciated over estimated useful lives of three to seven years. As of March 31, 2019,2021 and 2020, the Company performed an evaluation of the recoverability of these long-lived assets. The analysis was performed based on assumptions for both held for use and held for sale, andresulted in no impairment as a result an impairment of $1,139 was recorded as of March 31, 2019 related to these assets.

The Company acquired $3,423 in property and equipment on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream. In addition, $376 of land and buildings were acquired in the Rabb Resources acquisition.

 

Depreciation expense for the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 20182020 was $672$684 and $119,$286, respectively. During the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company disposed of $188 worth of equipment that had a net value of $148 for cash proceeds of $43, resulting in a loss on disposal of $105.

 

NOTE 7: INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

 

Intangible assets consisted of the following as of March 31:31, 2021 and 2020: 

 

 2019 2018  March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
Patents $1,013 $1,013  $1,013  $1,013 
Customer lists - - 
Customer relationships  2,100   2,100 
Non-compete agreements – Banner Midstream  250   250 
Outsourced vendor relationships 340 340   1,017   1,017 
Non-compete agreements 1,017 1,017 
Goodwill  -  - 
Non-compete agreements – Zest Labs  340   340 
Total intangible assets 2,370 2370   4,720   4,720 
Accumulated amortization and impairment  (2,370)  (825)  (2,655)  (2,370)
Intangible assets, net $- $1,545  $2,065  $2,350 

 

The outsourced vendorIn the acquisition of Banner Midstream, the Company acquired the customer relationships and non-compete agreements were recorded as partvalued at $2,350. The estimated useful lives of the acquisitioncustomer relationships is ten years based on the estimated cash flows from those customer contracts, and the estimated useful lives of 440labs described in Note 17 below.the non-compete agreement is five years amortized over a straight-line method.

 

Amortization expense for the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 20182020 was $553$285 and $555,$0, respectively.

 

The Company performed a review of its customers and business results at Sable in 2017 to assessfollowing is the recoverabilityfuture amortization of the carrying value of intangibles. As a result, impairment charges of $1,042 against the customer lists and a related write-down of goodwill of $582 from the initially recorded amount of $1,264 were recorded in the year ended March 31, 2018. In addition, $78 of the 440labs non-compete agreements were impaired due to the separation of one of the key employees and the remaining goodwill of $65 related to the 440labs acquisition was impaired in the three months ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the remaining intangible assets of Zest Labs and made the decision to fully impair the remaining net book value of $992intangibles as of March 31, 2019.31:

 

Intangible assets consisting of customer lists and patents for Pioneer, including those held by Ecoark, and Magnolia have been reclassified for all years presented as assets held for sale as more fully described in Note 2 and accordingly amortization and impairment expense has been included in the loss from discontinued operations.

NOTE 8: ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of March 31: 

  2019  2018 
Professional fees and consulting costs $

150

  $325 
Vacation and paid time off  345   278 
Legal fees  

108

   100 
Payroll and employee expenses  50   75 
Hardware in transit  -   26 
Other  175   276 
Total $828  $1,080 

2022  $349 
2023   257 
2024   265 
2025   262 
2026   220 
Thereafter   712 
   $2,065 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

In addition to the statutory based intangible assets noted above, the Company recorded a total of $10,225 of goodwill in connection with the purchase of Trend and Banner Midstream.

Accordingly, goodwill was as follows as of March 31, 2021:

Acquisition – Trend Discovery $3,223 
Acquisition – Banner Midstream  7,002 
Goodwill –March 31, 2021 $10,225 

The Company assessed the criteria for impairment, and there were no indicators of impairment present as of March 31, 2021, and therefore no impairment is necessary. 

NOTE 8: ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

  March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
Professional fees and consulting costs $801  $106 
Vacation and paid time off  107   126 
Legal fees  86   503 
Compensation  734   865 
Interest  65   673 
Insurance  1,013   548 
Other  785   215 
Total $3,591  $3,036 

On March 27, 2020, the Company assumed $2,362 of liabilities in the acquisition of Banner Midstream, and in addition, assumed $2,362 of liabilities in amounts that are due to prior owners of Banner Midstream and their subsidiaries. These amounts are non-interest bearing and due on demand. As of March 31, 2021 and 2020, $0 and $2,358 of the amounts due to prior owners were currently due. The Company converted $1,228 of amounts due to prior owners into shares of common stock which resulted in a loss on conversion of $1,248 in the year ended March 31, 2021 and $814 was paid in cash in the year ended March 31, 2021.

NOTE 9: WARRANT DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

 

As described in Note 3 and Note 13, theThe Company issued common stock and warrants in several private placements in March 2017, May 2017, March 2018 and August 2018. The March and May 2017 and March and August 2018 warrants (collectively the “Derivative Warrant Instruments”) are classified as liabilities. The Derivative Warrant Instruments have been accounted for utilizing ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”.Hedging.” The Company has incurred a liability for the estimated fair value of Derivative Warrant Instruments. The estimated fair value of the Derivative Warrant Instruments has been calculated using the Black-Scholes fair value option-pricing model with key input variables provided by management, as of the date of issuance, with changes in fair value recorded as gains or losses on revaluation in other income (expense).


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

 

The Company identified embedded features in the March and May 2017 warrants which caused the warrants to be classified as a liability. These embedded features included the implicit right for the holders to request that the Company settle the warrants in registered shares. Since maintaining an effective registration of shares is potentially outside the control of the Company, these warrants were classified as liabilities as opposed to equity. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company treat the whole instrument as liability and record the fair value of the instrument as derivatives as of the inception date of the instrument and to adjust the fair value of the instrument as of each subsequent balance sheet date.

 

On October 28, 2019, the Company issued 449 shares of the Company’s common stock to investors in exchange for the March and May 2017 warrants. Upon the issuance of the 449 shares, the March and May 2017 warrants were extinguished. The fair value of the shares issued was $2,186, and the fair value of the warrants was $1,966 resulting in a loss of $220 that was recognized on the exchange.

The Company identified embedded features in the March and August 2018 warrants which caused the warrants to be classified as a liability. These embedded features included the right for the holders to request that the Company cash settle the warrant instruments from the Holderholder by paying to the Holderholder an amount of cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of the remaining unexercised portion of the Derivative Warrant Instruments on the date of the consummation of a fundamental transaction. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company treat the whole instrument as liability and record the fair value of the instrument as derivatives as of the inception date of the instrument and to adjust the fair value of the instrument as of each subsequent balance sheet date.

 

On July 12, 2019, the dateMarch and August 2018 warrants were exchanged for 855 shares of inception,Company common stock, and all of those warrants were extinguished. The fair value of the shares issued was $3,293, and the fair value of the March 2017 warrants was $2,454 resulting in a loss of $4,609$839 that was determined usingrecognized on the Black-Scholes Model basedexchange.

As described further in Note 13 below, on August 22, 2019 the Company issued warrants to purchase 784 shares of Company common stock to investors that invested in shares of Company preferred stock. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $1,576 at inception and on January 26, 2020, the Company entered into letter agreements with accredited institutional investors holding the warrants issued with the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock on August 21, 2019.

Pursuant to the letter agreements, the investors agreed to a risk-free interest ratecash exercise of 2.13%784 warrants at a price of $2.55 per share. The Company additionally, granted 1,176 warrants at $4.50. On January 27, 2020, the Company received approximately $2,000 in cash from the exercise of the August 2019 warrants and issued the January 2020 warrants to the investors, which have an expected termexercise price of 5.0$4.50 per share and may be exercised within five years an expected volatility of 107%issuance. This transaction resulted in a loss on extinguishment of $1,038.

On November 11, 2019, the Company issued warrants to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the Company equal to the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock purchased by the investors.

The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $1,107 at inception and a 0% dividend yield. At$543 as of March 31, 2017,2020. The Company recognized $107 of interest expense related to the fair value of the March 2017 warrants of $3,351 was determined usingat inception that exceeded the Black-Scholes Model basedproceeds received for the preferred stock on a risk-free interest rate of 1.93% an expected term of 4.9 years, an expected volatility of 105% and a 0% dividend yield. At March 31, 2018, the fair value of the March 2017 warrants of $537 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.56% an expected term of 4.0 years, an expected volatility of 91% and a 0% dividend yield. At March 31, 2019, the fair value of the March 2017 warrants $256 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.23% an expected term of 3.0 years, an expected volatility of 96% and a 0% dividend yield.

On the date of inception, the fair value of the May 2017 warrants of $7,772 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 1.80% an expected term of 5.0 years, an expected volatility of 101% and a 0% dividend yield. At March 31, 2018, the fair value of the May 2017 warrants of $1,001 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.56% an expected term of 4.17 years, an expected volatility of 91% and a 0% dividend yield. At March 31, 2019, the fair value of the May 2017 warrants of $505 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.23% an expected term of 3.17 years, an expected volatility of 96% and a 0% dividend yield.

On the date of inception, the fair value of the March 2018 warrants of $3,023 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.65% an expected term of 5.0 years, an expected volatility of 91% and a 0% dividend yield. At March 31, 2018, the fair value of the March 2018 warrants of $2,156 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.56% an expected term of 5.0 years, an expected volatility of 91% and a 0% dividend yield. At March 31, 2019, the fair value of the March 2018 warrants of $1,040 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.23% an expected term of 4.00 years, an expected volatility of 96% and a 0% dividend yield.

On the date of inception, the fair value of the August 2018 warrants of $2,892 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.77% an expected term of 5.00 years, an expected volatility of 97% and a 0% dividend yield. At March 31, 2019, the fair value of the August 2018 warrants of $1,303 was determined using the Black-Scholes Model based on a risk-free interest rate of 2.23% an expected term of 4.42 years, an expected volatility of 96% and a 0% dividend yield.

November 11, 2019.

 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 2021

On April 15, 2020, the Company granted 40 warrants with an exercise price of $3.65 per share to extend the maturity date of the Senior Secured Debt acquired in the Banner Midstream acquisition to May 31, 2020. The Company does not believe this transaction constitutes an accounting extinguishment of debt due to a material modification of the debt instrument. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $84 at inception and $357 as of September 30, 2020. These warrants were exercised in the three months ended December 31, 2020.

On April 15, 2020, the Company granted 10 warrants with an exercise price of $3.65 per share to extend the maturity date of the Senior Secured Debt acquired in the Banner Midstream acquisition to May 31, 2020. The Company does not believe this transaction constitutes an accounting extinguishment of debt due to a material modification of the debt instrument. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $21 at inception and $89 as of September 30, 2020. These warrants were exercised in the three months ended December 31, 2020.

On April 15 and 16, 2020, the Company received $438 in proceeds in a loan provided by Trend Discovery SPV I. Since they were the borrower and responsible for repayment of these amounts the Company granted 200 warrants at $3.65 per share for collateral for the loan. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $419 at inception and $2,753 as of June 30, 2020. These warrants were exercised in the three months ended September 30, 2020.

On May 10, 2020, the November 2019 and January 2020 warrants were exchanged for 1,452 shares of Company common stock, and all of those warrants were extinguished resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $1,630.

On May 10, 2020, the Company issued warrants that can be exercised to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the Company. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $6,115 at inception and $15,620 as of June 30, 2020.

During the three months ended September 30, 2020, 881 of the May 10, 2020 of the warrants were exchanged for 881 shares of common stock of the Company for $4,847 cash. The fair value of the 295 warrants that remain as of September 30, 2020 is $2,493. In addition, on September 1, 2020, 200 April 16, 2020 warrants were exercised into 200 shares of the Company’s common stock for $730 in cash.

On September 24, 2020, the Company granted 250 warrants, for the early conversion of the April 15, 2020 warrants at a strike price of $9.65 per share with a term of two-years. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $1,265 at inception and $1,425 as of September 30, 2020. As a result of the November 14, 2020 warrant grant, the strike price was recalculated to $7.75 per share as there were price protections included in the warrant agreement. As a result of the closing of the registered direct offering on December 29, 2020, the grantee of the warrants waived the lowering of the strike price and the strike price reverted back to $9.65 per share.

On November 14, 2020, the Company granted 60 warrants, for the early conversion of a portion of the September 24, 2020 warrants, with a strike price of $7.75 per share with a term of two-years. The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $251 at inception, and $458 as of March 31, 2021.

On December 30, 2020, the Company granted 889 warrants, in the direct registered offering under the effective Form S-3, with a strike price of $10.00 with a term of two-years (maturity January 2, 2023). The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $4,655 at inception and $4,653 as of December 31, 2020. During the three months ended March 31, 2021, 176 warrants were exercised for $1,760, and the fair value of the remaining warrants is $4,993.

On December 30, 2020, the Company granted 62 warrants to the placement agent as additional compensation in connection with the registered direct offering closed December 31, 2020, exercisable at a strike price of $11.25 per share for a term of two-years (expiring January 2, 2023). The fair value of those warrants was estimated to be $308 at inception and $413 as of March 31, 2021. 

F-23

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

During the three months ended December 31, 2020, the remaining May 10, 2020 warrants were exercised for 295 shares of common stock of the Company for $1,623 cash. In addition, on November 13, 2020, 50 September 24, 2020 warrants were exercised for 50 shares of the Company’s common stock for $483 in cash, and on November 23, 2020, 50 April 15, 2020 warrants were exercised under a cashless exercise provision. The fair value of the 200 warrants that remain outstanding as of March 31, 2021 is $1,349.

The Company determined our derivative liabilities to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and used the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value as of March 31, 2021 and 2020. The Black-Scholes model requires six basic data inputs: the exercise or strike price, time to expiration, the risk-free interest rate, the current stock price, the estimated volatility of the stock price in the future, and the dividend rate.

Changes to these inputs could produce a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The fair value of each warrant is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following assumptions were used on March 31, 2021 and 2020 and at inception: 

Year EndedYear Ended
March 31,
2021
March 31,
2020
Inception
Expected term4.58 - 5 years4.67-4.83 years5.00 years
Expected volatility94 - 101%95%91% - 107%
Expected dividend yield---
Risk-free interest rate0.61 - 1.74%0.70%1.50% -2.77%
Market price$3.05 - $10.00$2.75 - $5.20

 

The Company’s derivative liabilities associated with the warrants are as follows:

 

  March 31, 2019  March 31, 2018  Inception 
Fair value of 1,000 March 17, 2017 warrants $256  $537  $4,609 
Fair value of 1,850 May 22, 2017 warrants  505   1,001   7,772 
Fair value of 2,565 March 16, 2018 warrants  1,040   2,156   3,023 
Fair value of 2,969 August 14, 2018 warrants  1,303   -   2,892 
  $3,104  $3,694  $18,296 
  March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
  Inception 
Fair value of 276 November 11, 2019 warrants $-  $543  $1,107 
Fair value of 1,176 January 27, 2020 warrants  -   2,232   3,701 
Fair value of 40 April 15, 2020 warrants  -   -   84 
Fair value of 10 April 15, 2020 warrants  -   -   21 
Fair value of 200 April 16, 2020 warrants  -   -   419 
Fair value of 1,176 May 10, 2020 warrants  -   -   6,115 
Fair value of 250 September 24, 2020 warrants  1,349   -   1,265 
Fair value of 60 November 14, 2020 warrants  458   -   251 
Fair value of 889 December 31, 2020 warrants  4,993   -   4,655 
Fair value of 62 December 31, 2020 warrants  413   -   308 
  $7,213  $2,775     

 

During the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 20182020 the Company recognized changes in the fair value of the derivative liabilities of $3,160$(18,518) and $9,316,$(369), respectively. The March and May 2017 warrants, March and August 2018 warrants, the August and November 2019 warrants, and the January 2020, April 16, 2020 and May 10, 2020 warrants were exercised in full and thus were no longer outstanding as of March 31, 2021.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

 

Activity related to the warrant derivative liabilities for the year ended March 31, 2021 is as follows:

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2020 $2,775 
Issuances of warrants – derivative liabilities  13,118 
Warrants exchanged for common stock  (27,198)
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities  18,518 
Ending balance as of March 31, 2021 $7,213 

Activity related to the warrant derivative liabilities for the year ended March 31, 2020 is as follows:

Beginning balance as of March 31, 2019 $3,104 
Issuances of warrants – derivative liabilities  6,384 
Warrants exchanged for common stock  (6,344)
Change in fair value of warrant derivative liabilities  (369)
Ending balance as of March 31, 2020 $2,775 

NOTE 10: NOTE PAYABLECAPITALIZED DRILLING COSTS AND OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES

 

On December 28, 2018,Capitalized Drilling Costs

In January 2021, the Company commenced a drilling program on their Deshotel 24H well included in their proved reserves. The Company incurred $6,084 in costs related to this program of which $3,387 was expensed directly as drilling costs. The Company, pursuant to ASC 932 will amortize the remaining $2,697 of these costs, under the full-cost method based on the units of production method. Depletion expense for the year ended March 31, 2021 for the capitalized drilling costs was $130. As of March 31, 2021, the capitalized drilling costs were $2,567. There were no such costs for the year ended March 31, 2020.

Oil and Gas Properties

The Company’s holdings in oil and gas mineral lease (“OGML”) properties as of March 31, 2021 and 2020 are:

  March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
Total OGML Properties Acquired $12,352  $6,135 

The Company acquired the following from Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020:

Cherry et al OGML including shallow drilling rights was acquired by Shamrock from Hartoil Company on July 1, 2018.

O’Neal Family OGML and Weyerhaeuser OGML including shallow drilling rights were acquired by White River on July 1, 2019 from Livland, LLC and Hi-Tech Onshore Exploration, LLC respectively in exchange for a $125 drilling credit to be applied by Livland, LLC on subsequent drilling operations.

Taliaferro Family OGML including shallow drilling rights was acquired by White River on June 10, 2019 from Lagniappe Operating, LLC.

Kingrey Family OGML including both shallow and deep drilling rights was entered into by White River and the Kingrey Family on April 3, 2019.

Peabody Family OGML including both shallow and deep drilling rights was acquired by White River on June 18, 2019 from SR Acquisition I, LLC, a subsidiary of Sanchez Energy Corporation, for a 1% royalty retained interest in conjunction with White River executing a lease saving operation in June 2019.

As discussed in Note 16, the Company acquired certain leases on June 11, 2020 and June 18, 2020 in Mississippi and Louisiana valued at $2. These assets were paid entirely in cash. In addition, the Company impaired $83 of property as it let certain leases lapse.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

As discussed in Note 16, on August 14, 2020, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Rabb Resources, LTD which included the acquisition of real property. The purchase price for this acquisition was $3,500. Of this amount, $3,224, is reflected as Oil and Gas Properties.

As discussed in Note 16, on September 4, 2020, the Company entered into a $10,000 credit facility that includes a loanLease Assignment agreement. The purchase price for this acquisition was $1,500. Of this amount, $1,500, is reflected as Oil and security agreement (the “Agreement”) whereGas Properties.

As discussed in Note 16, on September 30, 2020, the lender agreed to make one or more loansCompany entered into three Asset Purchase Agreements. The purchase prices for these acquisitions were $750. Of this amount, $760, is reflected as Oil and Gas Properties.

As discussed in Note 16, on October 1, 2020, the Company entered into three Asset Purchase Agreements. The purchase price for these acquisitions were $22. Of this amount, $22, is reflected as Oil and Gas Properties.

As discussed in Note 16, on October 9, 2020, the Company entered into three Asset Purchase Agreements. The purchase price for these acquisitions were $615. Of this amount, $615, is reflected as Oil and Gas Properties.

In February and March 2021, the Company acquired additional leases for $916 under the Blackbrush/Deshotel lease related to the Participation Agreement.

The Company andhad an analysis completed by an independent petroleum consulting company in March 2021 to complete the Company may make a request for a loan or loansacquisition analysis within the required one-year period. There were no adjustments required from the lender, subject tooriginal asset allocation on March 27, 2020.

The following table summarizes the termsCompany’s oil and conditions.gas activities by classification for the year ended March 31, 2021. The Company is required to pay interest biannuallyonly activity for the year ended March 31, 2020, was the asset allocation of the acquisition of the oil and gas properties on March 27, 2020, which are represented in the outstanding principal amountMarch 31, 2020 column:

Activity Category March 31,
2020
  Adjustments (1)  March 31,
2021
 
Proved Developed Producing Oil and Gas Properties         
Cost $167  $737  $904 
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  -   (739)  (739)
Changes in estimates  -   6,319   6,319 
             
Total $167  $6,317  $6,484 
             
Undeveloped and Non-Producing Oil and Gas Properties            
Cost $5,968  $6,219  $12,187 
Changes in estimates  -   (6,319)  (6,319)
             
Total $5,968  $(100) $5,868 
             
Grand Total $6,135  $6,217  $12,352 

(1)Relates to acquisitions and dispositions of reserves.

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

NOTE 11: LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of each loan calculated at an annual ratethe following as of 12%. The loans are evidenced by a demand noteMarch 31, 2021 and 2020:

  March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
Credit facility – Trend Discovery SPV 1, LLC (a) $-  $- 
Senior secured bridge loan – Banner Midstream (b)  -   2,222 
Note payable – LAH 1 (c)  -   110 
Note payable – LAH 2 (d)  -   77 
Note payable – Banner Midstream 1 (e)  -   303 
Note payable – Banner Midstream 2 (f)  -   397 
Note payable – Banner Midstream 3 (g)  -   500 
Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) loan – Banner Midstream 1 (h)  -   361 
MCA loan – Banner Midstream 2 (i)  -   175 
MCA loan – Banner Midstream 3 (j)  -   28 
Note payable – Banner Midstream – Alliance Bank (k)  1,033   1,239 
Commercial loan – Pinnacle Frac – Firstar Bank (l)  626   952 
Auto loan 1 – Pinnacle Vac – Firstar Bank (m)  29   40 
Auto loan 2 – Pinnacle Frac – Firstar Bank (n)  38   52 
Auto loan 3 – Pinnacle Vac – Ally Bank (o)  34   42 
Auto loan 4 – Pinnacle Vac – Ally Bank (p)  35   47 
Auto loan 5 – Pinnacle Vac – Ally Bank (q)  -   44 
Auto loan 7 – Capstone – Ally Bank (r)  69   97 
Tractor loan 6 – Capstone – Tab Bank (s)  180   235 
Equipment loan – Shamrock – Workover Rig (t)  -   50 
Ecoark – PPP Loan (u)  24   - 
Pinnacle Frac Transport – PPP Loan (v)  -   - 
Total long-term debt  2,068   6,971 
Less: debt discount    (-)  (149)
Less: current portion  (1,056)  (6,401)
Long-term debt, net of current portion $1,012  $421 

(a)On December 28, 2018, the Company entered into a $10,000 credit facility that includes a loan and security agreement (the “Agreement”) where the lender agreed to make one or more loans to the Company, and the Company may make a request for a loan or loans from the lender, subject to the terms and conditions. The Company is required to pay interest biannually on the outstanding principal amount of each loan calculated at an annual rate of 12%. The loans are evidenced by demand notes executed by the Company. The Company is able to request draws from the lender up to $1,000 with a cap of $10,000, including the $1,000 advanced on December 28, 2018 and an additional $350 advanced through March 31, 2019, resulting in a balance of $1,350 at March 31, 2019.

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

A total of an additional $350$1,137 was advanced throughduring the year ended March 31, 2019. If principal is prepaid,2020; and $38 of commitment fees, to bring the loans may not be re-borrowed and the cap of $10,000 shall be reduced. The Company may make a request for a loan or loans from the lender, at any one time and from time to time, from the datebalance of the Agreement until the earlier of (i) demand by the lender or (ii) December 27, 2020 or the earlier termination of the Agreement pursuantnotes payable to the terms thereof.$2,525 at March 31, 2020. Loans made pursuant to the Agreement are secured by a security interest in the Company’s collateral held with the lender and guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiary, Zest Labs.

 

The Company is to paypays to the lender a commitment fee on the principal amount of each loan requested thereunder in the amount of 3.5% of the amount thereof. The Company also paid an arrangement fee of $300 to the lender which was paid upon execution of the Agreement. The aforementioned fees were and are netted from proceeds from the $1,000 initial advance on December 28, 2018.advanced and are recorded as interest expense. Zest Labs is a plaintiff in a litigation styled asZest Labs, Inc. vs WalMart,Walmart, Inc., Case Number 4:18-cv-00500 filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas (the “Zest Litigation”). The Company agrees that within five days of receipt by Zest Labs or the Company of any settlement proceeds from the Zest Litigation, the Company will pay or cause to be paid over to lender an additional fee in an amount equal to (i) 0.50 multiplied by (ii) the highest aggregate principal balance of the loans over the life of the loans through the date of the payment from settlement proceeds; provided, however, that such additional fee shall not exceed the amount of the settlement proceeds.

 

Subject to customary carve-outs, the Agreement contains customary negative covenants and restrictions for agreements of this type on actions by the Company including, without limitation, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, loans, consolidation, mergers, dissolution, asset dispositions outside the ordinary course of business, change in business and restriction on use of proceeds. In addition, the Agreement requires compliance by the Company of covenants including, but not limited to, furnishing the lender with certain financial reports and protecting and maintaining its intellectual property rights. The Agreement contains customary events of default, including, without limitation, non-payment of principal or interest, violation of covenants, inaccuracy of representations in any material respect and cross defaults with certain other indebtedness and agreements.

On March 31, 2020, the lender converted all principal and interest in the Trend Discovery SPV I, LLC credit facility into shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion of $2,525 of principal and $290 of accrued interest resulted in the issuance of 771 shares of common stock at a value of $2.95 per share. This transaction resulted in a gain on conversion of $541. As a result of the conversion, there are no amounts outstanding as of March 31, 2020.

(b)Senior secured bridge loan of $2,222, containing a debt discount of $132 as of March 31, 2020. This was assumed in the Banner Midstream acquisition, and fully repaid in May 2020, and was secured by machinery and equipment of Pinnacle Frac.

(c)Unsecured note payable previously issued April 2, 2018 which was assumed by Banner Midstream in the acquisition of a previous entity. The amount was past due and bears interest at 10% per annum. This amount along with accrued interest of $22 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream. Amount was paid off in May 2020, and $24 of accrued interest remains at March 31, 2021.
(d)Unsecured note payable previously issued April 2, 2018 which was assumed by Banner Midstream in the acquisition of a previous entity. The amount was past due and bears interest at 10% per annum. This amount along with accrued interest of $22 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream. Amount was paid off in May 2020, and $24 of accrued interest remains at March 31, 2021.

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 2021

(e)Junior secured note payable issued January 16, 2019 to an unrelated third party at 10% interest. This amount along with accrued interest of $39 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream. This note along with the accrued interest was repaid in May 2020.

(f)Unsecured notes payable issued in June and July 2019 to an unrelated third party at 10% interest. There are three notes to this party in total. This amount along with accrued interest of $29 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream. These notes were converted in May 2020.
(g)Unsecured note payable issued October 2019 to an unrelated third party at 10% interest. This amount along with accrued interest of $23 was assumed on March 27, 2020 in the acquisition of Banner Midstream. The balance of this note and remaining accrued interest was converted into 86 shares of common stock in the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020.

(h)Merchant cash advance loan on Banner Midstream. The Company assumed $368 of this note along with accrued interest of $144. This note along with the accrued interest was repaid in May 2020.

(i)Merchant cash advance loan on Banner Midstream. The Company assumed $181 of this note along with accrued interest of $70. This note along with the accrued interest was repaid in May 2020.

(j)Merchant cash advance loan on Banner Midstream. The Company assumed $69 of this note along with accrued interest of $21. This note along with the accrued interest was repaid in May 2020.

(k)Original loan date of June 14, 2019 with an original maturity date of April 14, 2020. The Company extended this loan for $1,239 at 4.95% with a new maturity date of April 14, 2025. This loan and discount was assumed in the Banner Midstream acquisition.

(l)Original loan date of February 28, 2018, due December 31, 2021 (after the extension on April 28, 2021) at 4.75%. This loan was assumed in the Banner Midstream acquisition.

(m)On July 20, 2018, Pinnacle Vac Service entered into a long-term secured note payable for $56 for a service truck maturing July 20, 2023. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 6.50% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2021. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(n)On August 3, 2018, Pinnacle Frac Transport entered into a long-term secured note payable for $73 for a service truck maturing August 3, 2023. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 6.50% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2021. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(o)On July 18, 2018, Pinnacle Vac Service entered into a long-term secured note payable for $56 for a service truck maturing August 17, 2024. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 9.00% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2021. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

F-29

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

(p)On July 26, 2018, Pinnacle Vac Service entered into a long-term secured note payable for $54 for a service truck maturing September 9, 2024. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 7.99% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2021. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(q)On July 26, 2018, Pinnacle Vac Service entered into a long-term secured note payable for $54 for a service truck maturing September 9, 2024. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 7.99% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2021. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020. This note was prepaid in the year ended March 31, 2021.

(r)On November 5, 2018, Capstone Equipment Leasing entered into four long-term secured notes payable for $140 maturing on November 5, 2021. The notes are secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at rates ranging between 6.89% and 7.87% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2021. These notes were assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.

(s)On November 7, 2018, Capstone Equipment Leasing entered into a long-term secured note payable for $301 maturing on November 22, 2023. The note is secured by the collateral purchased and accrued interest annually at 10.25% with principal and interest payments due monthly. There is no accrued interest as of March 31, 2021. This note was assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020.
(t)Equipment loan assumed in the acquisition of Banner Midstream on March 27, 2020 and repaid with accrued interest in June 2020.
(u)PPP loan received by Ecoark Holdings Inc. in April 2020. Loan bears interest at 1% per annum and matures April 2022. On November 19, 2020, the Company received confirmation that $356 in principal and $2 in accrued interest has been forgiven, and this amount has been reflected in forgiveness of debt. The remaining $29, will be due in monthly installments of $2 through maturity in May 2022.
(v)PPP loan received by Pinnacle Frac Transport in April 2020. Loan bears interest at 1% per annum and matures April 2022. On November 27, 2020, the entire loan balance of $1,483 and accrued interest of $9 was forgiven and this amount has been reflected as forgiveness of debt.

The following is a list of maturities as of March 31:

2022  $1,056 
2023   366 
2024   340 
2025   283 
2026   23 
   $2,068 

During the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company received proceeds of $1,869 in new long-term debt, repaid $4,100 in existing long-term debt, converted $830 in existing long-term debt that resulted in a loss on conversion of $1,337, and had $1,850 forgiven in long-term debt and accrued interest. In addition, the Company converted $65 of accrued interest and paid $361 in accrued interest during this period. The Company recognized a loss of $146 on conversion of the accrued interest to common stock in the year ended March 31, 2021. Interest expense on long-term debt during the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 are $173 and $297, respectively.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

 

NOTE 11: LONG-TERM DEBT12: NOTES PAYABLE - RELATED PARTIES

 

Long-term debtNotes payable to related parties consisted of the following as of March 31:31, 2021 and 2020:

 

  2019  2018 
Secured convertible promissory note $    -  $500 
Less: current portion  -   (500)
Long-term debt, net of current portion $-  $- 
  March 31,
2021
 March 31,
2020
Ecoark Holdings Board Member (a) $578  $578 
Ecoark Holdings Officers (b)     1,242 
Banner Midstream Officers (c)     152 
Ecoark Holdings – common ownership (d)     200 
Total Notes Payable – Related Parties  578   2,172 
Less: Current Portion of Notes Payable – Related Parties  (578)  (2,172)
Long-term debt, net of current portion $  $ 

(a)A board member advanced $328 to the Company through March 31, 2020, under the terms of a note payable that bears 10% simple interest per annum, and the principal balance along with accrued interest is payable upon demand. In addition, the Company assumed $250 in notes entered into in March 2020 via the acquisition of Banner Midstream from the same board member at 15% interest. In addition, another board member advanced $4 in the six months ended September 30, 2020 which is non-interest bearing and due on demand, and has been repaid in the quarter ended September 30, 2020. Interest expense on the notes for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 was $116 and $27, respectively, and $17 is accrued as of March 31, 2021.

(b)William B. Hoagland, Chief Financial Officer, advanced $30 to the Company in May 2019 pursuant to a note with the same terms as the note with the board member. Randy May, CEO, advanced $45 to the Company in August 2019 pursuant to a note with the same terms as the note with the board member. Interest expense on both of these notes was $5. Both of these amounts, along with the accrued interest, was repaid during the year ended March 31, 2020. In addition, Randy May advanced $1,242 in five separate notes to Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition by the Company. These amounts were due at various times through December 2020 at 10-15% interest per annum. All of these notes have been repaid as of March 31, 2021.

(c)An officer of Banner Midstream who remains an officer of this subsidiary advanced $152 in three separate notes to Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition by the Company and an additional $180 in four separate advances in the year ended March 31, 2021. These amounts were due at various times through December 2020 at 10-15% interest per annum. All of these notes have been repaid as of March 31, 2021.
(d)A company controlled by an officer of the Company advanced $200 to Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition by the Company. These amounts were due April 15, 2020 and bears interest at 14% interest per annum. These notes were converted into the Company’s common stock in May 2020.

 

The Company had a secured convertible promissory note (“convertible note”) bearing interest at 10% per annum, entered on January 10, 2017 for $500 withDuring the principal due in one lump sum payment on or before July 10, 2018. The convertible note was part of the financing the Company entered into in the three monthsyear ended March 31, 2017, that raised $4,300 (of a maximum2021, the Company received proceeds of $5,000)$954 in convertible notes ($700 of which were frompayable – related parties, see Note 10) bearing interest at 10% per annum. On March 30, 2017, $3,700repaid $1,973 in existing notes payable – related parties, and converted $575 in existing notes payable – related parties that resulted in a loss on conversion of these notes were$1,239. In addition, the Company converted (including $600$15 of the $700 in connection with the related parties) into shares of common stock, along with the related accrued interest on those notes.during this period.

 

The Company granted note holders a security interest for the holder’s ratable share of the series notes in the Company’s ownership interest in Sable as collateral. The note holders had the right at the holders’ option to convert all or any portion of the principal amount at a conversion rate per share which ranges from $4.15 to $7.10 per share (the only non-related party note still outstanding has a conversion price of $4.50). In February 2017, the Company amended the convertible note whereby certain holders (not including related parties) received a warrant to purchase 10 shares of common stock for every $100 principal amount if the holder converted the note on or before March 31, 2017. The principal along with accrued interest of $11 was paid on July 2, 2018.

Interest expense on the long-term debt for the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $12 and $50, respectively.


 

NOTE 12: RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement related to the issuance and sale of up to 1,100 shares of common stock held by Randy May, Chairman of the Board and former CEO, and Gary Metzger, an independent director on the Company’s Board and a significant shareholder. The purchase agreement is pursuant to the Company’s Form S-3 registration statement filed on August 17, 2016. The selling securityholders may sell or distribute the securities included in the prospectus supplement through underwriters, through agents, to dealers, in private transactions, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market prices, or at negotiated prices. The Company will not receive any of the proceeds from sales of the common stock made by the selling securityholders.

Subsequent to MarchECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2019, Gary Metzger has advanced to the Company $328 under a note that bears 10% simple interest per annum and is payable July 30, 2020.2021

 

NOTE 13: STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

Ecoark Holdings Preferred Stock

 

TheOn March 18, 2016, the Company hascreated 5,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001. On August 21, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), the Company and two accredited investors entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the investors an aggregate of 2 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 authorized. No preferredper share at a price of $1,000 per share.

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to each investor a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock purchased by the investor. Each Warrant has an exercise price equal to $2.55, subject to full ratchet price anti-dilution provisions in accordance with the terms of the Warrants (the “Exercise Price”) and is exercisable for five years after the Effective Date. In addition, if the market price of the Common Stock on the 11 month anniversary of the closing date of the offering is less than $2.55, holder of the warrants shall be entitled to receive additional shares of common stock based on the number of shares of common stock that would have been issued.issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock had the initial conversion price been equal to the market price at such time (but not less than $1.25) less the number of shares of common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock based on the $2.55 conversion price.

The Company also agreed to amend the current exercise price of the warrants that the investors received in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreements dated March 14, 2017 (the “March Warrants”) and May 22, 2017 (the “May Warrants” and, together with the March Warrants, the “Existing Securities”). The Existing Securities have a current exercise price of $2.95, which was amended from $12.50 on July 12, 2019. The current exercise price for the Existing Securities shall be amended to reduce the exercise price to $2.55 on August 21, 2019, subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of the Existing Securities.

Each share of the Series B Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $1,000 (the “Stated Value”) and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $2.55, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

The Company received gross proceeds from the Private Placement of $2,000, before deducting transaction costs, fees and expenses payable by the Company. The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Private Placement to support the Company’s general working capital requirements.

On August 21, 2019, the Company issued 60 shares of common stock to advisors that assisted with the securities purchase agreement and exchange agreement.

On October 15, 2019, nearly all the Series B Preferred Stock shares were converted into 752 shares of Common Stock.

On November 11, 2019, the Company and two accredited investors entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company sold and issued to the investors an aggregate of 1 share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series C Preferred Stock”), at a price of $1,000 per share (the “Private Placement”).

 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued to each investor a warrant (a “Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock, equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock purchased by the Investor. Each Warrant has an exercise price equal to $3.65, subject to full ratchet price anti-dilution provisions in accordance with the terms of the Warrants (the “Exercise Price”) and is exercisable for five years after the Effective Date.

In addition, if the market price of the Common Stock for the five trading days prior to July 22, 2020 is less than $3.65, holder of the warrants shall be entitled to receive additional shares of common stock based on the number of shares of common stock that would have been issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock had the initial conversion price been equal to the market price at such time (but not less than $1.25) less the number of shares of common stock issued or issuable upon exercise of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock based on the $3.65 conversion price.

Each share of the Series C Preferred Stock has a par value of $0.001 per share and a stated value equal to $5,000 (the “Stated Value”) and is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the stated value by the conversion price of $3.65, subject to certain limitations and adjustments (the “Conversion Price”).

The Company received gross proceeds from the Private Placement of $1,000.

The Company used the net proceeds of the Private Placement to support the Company’s general working capital requirements.

In April 2020, the remaining shares of preferred stock in these transactions were converted into 308 shares of common stock.

On November 12, 2020, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada, a Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 (“Series A-1 Preferred Stock”). The Certificate of Designation of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock was effective upon the filing to the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. The Company has authorized one share of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and this share was issued on November 12, 2020. On November 27, 2020, the one share of Series A-1 Preferred Stock was redeemed. After the redemption, the Company filed a Certificate of Withdrawal with the State of Nevada, which was effective upon this filing and had the effect of amending the Company’s articles of incorporation to eliminate all references to the Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

The material terms of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock prior to the withdrawal was as follows:

Voting Rights

The Series A-1 Preferred Stock shall have the right to vote and/or consent solely on a proposal to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock, that the Company is authorized to issue and to ratify the issuance of certain shares issued by the Company in excess of 100,000 shares or other issuances authorized by the stockholders voting together with the common stockholders as one class. With respect to any regular or special meeting of the stockholders to consider the Proposals, the holder of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock shall be entitled to the same notice of any regular or special meeting of the stockholders as may or shall be given to holders of Common Stock entitled to vote at such meetings.

Solely with respect to such proposals, the Series A-1 Preferred Stock shall have voting power equal to 51% of the number of votes eligible to vote on the proposals at any special or annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders (with the power to take action by written consent in lieu of a stockholders meeting). The Series A-1 Preferred Stock shall not have the right to vote and/or consent on any matter other than the proposals.

Automatic Cancellation

Any Series A-1 Preferred Stock issued and outstanding on the record date fixed by the Board of Directors or determined in accordance with the bylaws of the Company to vote and/or consent to the proposals shall be automatically surrendered to the Company and cancelled for no consideration upon the earlier of (i) the effectiveness of the amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation that is authorized by stockholder approval of such Authorized Share Increase Proposal or (ii) the approval of the Ratification Proposal. Upon such surrender and cancellation, all rights of the Series A-1 Preferred Stock shall cease and terminate, and the Series A-1 Preferred Stock shall be retired and shall not be reissued.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

 

Ecoark Holdings Common Stock

The Company has 100,000is authorized to issue 30,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 authorized.$0.001. Effective with the opening of trading on December 17, 2020, the Company implemented a one-for-five reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock and a simultaneous proportionate reduction of its authorized common stock. All share and per share figures are reflected on a post-split basis herein. Effective December 29, 2020, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to reduce its authorized common stock from 40,000 shares to 30,000 shares.

 

InOn May 2017,31, 2019, the Company acquired Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc. for 1,100 shares of common stock. The value of this transaction was $3,237.

On July 12, 2019, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with investors that are the holders of March and August 2018 warrants. As a result of a cashless exercise, the Company issued 2,500855 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to a private placement offeringthe investors. Upon the issuance of the 855 shares, the March and August 2018 warrants for $9,106, net1,135 shares were extinguished. The fair value of expenses, with $2,029 recorded as equitythe shares issued was $3,293, and the remainder to derivative liabilities (seeSecurities Purchase Agreement – Institutional Funds below).

In March 2018,fair value of the warrants was $2,455 resulting in a loss of $839 that was recognized on the exchange. On August 21, 2019, the Company issued 2,50060 shares to advisors that assisted with the securities purchase agreement and exchange agreement.

On October 15, 2019, nearly all the Series B Preferred Stock shares were converted into 752 shares of Common Stock. On October 28, 2019, the Company issued 449 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to a private placement offeringinvestors in exchange for $3,587, netthe March and May 2017 warrants. Upon the issuance of expenses, with $1,005 recorded as equitythe 449 shares, the March and May 2017 warrants were extinguished. The fair value of the shares issued was $2,186, and the remainder to derivative liabilities (seeSecurities Purchase Agreement – Institutional Funds below).

The Company issued 201 shares for board compensation valued at $550 forfair value of the year ended Marchwarrants was $1,966 resulting in a loss of $220 that was recognized on the exchange. On October 31, 2018.

During the year ended March 31, 2018,2019, the Company issued 65 shares to consultants under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan.

During the year ended March 31, 2018 the Company issued 1,544 shares to employees in stock grants vested under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan and 239 shares to employees in service-based Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) vested under the 2017 Ecoark Holdings Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan”).

The total share-based compensation expense for the year ended March 31, 2018 was $24,952. The Company acquired 54524 shares of common stock from employees in lieufor services rendered. On December 20, 2019, the Company issued 26 shares of amounts requiredcommon stock for services rendered. A loss of $100 was recognized related to satisfy minimum tax withholding requirements of $1,618 resulting from vestingthe issuance of the employees’ stock.

The Company issued 300 shares in May 2017 for the acquisition of 440labs valued at $1,500.

The Company issued 300 shares in May 2017 upon the execution of employment agreements with employees of 440labs valued at $1,500 recorded as share-based compensation.

In May 2017,49 shares. On December 24, 2019, the Company issued 49 shares of common stock for the cashless exercise of 100 warrantsservices to a consultant. The remaining 51 shares were forfeited.be rendered in 2020.

 

On April 14, 2017,February 21, 2020, the Company soldissued 2 shares of common stock for services valued at $7.

On January 27, 2020, the assets, liabilitiesCompany exercised the 784 warrants which were granted in August 2019 into common shares.

On March 27, 2020, the Company and membership interests in Eco3dBanner Energy, a Nevada corporation (“Banner Parent”), entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Banner Purchase Agreement”) to acquire Banner Midstream Corp., a group led by executives of Eco3d afterDelaware corporation (“Banner Midstream”). Pursuant to the Company’s Board concluded that Eco3d did not fit the future strategic directionacquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company received $2,029 in cash and 560Banner Parent received shares of the Company’s common stock thatin exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Banner Midstream.

The Company issued 1,789 shares of common stock (which Banner Parent issued to certain of its noteholders) and assumed $11,771 in debt of Banner Midstream. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and another director recused themselves from all board discussions on the acquisition of Banner Midstream as they are stockholders and/or noteholders of Banner Midstream. The transaction was heldapproved by executivesall of Eco3d, whichthe disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Chairman and CEO of Banner Parent is a former officer of the Company and has maintained a relationship with the Company as a consultant.

On March 31, 2020, the Company converted all principal and interest in the Trend Discovery SPV I, LLC credit facility into shares were canceled.of the Company’s common stock. The conversion of approximately $2,525 of principal and $290 of accrued interest resulted in the issuance of 771 shares of common stock at a value of $2.95 per share. As a result of the conversion, there are no amounts outstanding as of March 31, 2020. 

In the three months ended June 30, 2020, the Company issued 308 shares of common stock in April and May 2020 to convert the remaining shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock; 1,531 shares of common stock in the exercise of warrants; 89 shares in the exercise of stock options; 93 shares of common stock in the conversion of accounts payable and accrued expenses; and 524 shares of common stock in the conversion of long-term debt, notes payable – related parties and accrued interest.

In the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued 1,088 shares of common stock in the exercise of warrants; one share in the exercise of stock options; 31 shares of common stock for services rendered; 171 shares of common stock to acquire assets; and 192 shares of common stock in the conversion of long-term debt, notes payable – related parties and accrued interest.

In the three months ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 376 shares of common stock in the exercise of warrants.

On December 31, 2020, the Company completed a registered direct offering of common stock and warrants, whereby the Company issued 889 shares of common stock and 889 accompanying warrants to purchase common stock to one institutional investor under the effective Form S-3 at $9.00 per share and accompanying warrant for a total of $8,000 in gross proceeds, before placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The warrants are exercisable for a two-year term at a strike price of $10.00 per share. The Company granted 62 warrants to the placement agent as compensation in addition to the $560 cash commission received by the placement agent. The placement agent warrants are exercisable at $11.25 per share and expire on January 2, 2023.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

Securities Purchase Agreements – Institutional Funds

OnIn the three months ended March 14, 2017,31, 2021, the Company completed a reserved private placement agreement entered into on March 13, 2017 related to the issuance and sale of 2,000issued 176 shares of common stock for $8,000 ($7,255 net of expenses) to institutional purchasers at $4.00 per share. The purchase agreement is pursuant to the Company’s Form S-3 registration statement filed on August 17, 2016. The purchasers also received warrants to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock equal to 50% of the purchaser’s shares for $5.00 for up to 5 years from the date the transaction completed. The investment bankers for the transaction received warrants to purchase 140 shares of common stock for $5.00 for up to 5 years, the same terms as the investors. Of the total net proceeds of $7,255, $4,609 were determined to be warrant liabilities, and $429 of the fees that were considered related to liabilities were charged to other expense.

On May 22, 2017, the Company completed a reserved private placement agreement related to the issuance and sale of 2,500 shares of common stock for $10,000 ($9,106 net of expenses) to institutional purchasers at $4.00 per share. The purchase agreement is pursuant to the Company’s Form S-3 registration statement filed on August 17, 2016. The purchasers also received warrants to purchase 1,875 shares of common stock equal to 50% of the purchaser’s shares for $5.50 for up to 5 years from the date the transaction completed. The investment bankers for the transaction received warrants to purchase 175 shares of common stock for $5.50 for up to 5 years, the same terms as the investors. Of the total net proceeds of $9,106, $7,772 were determined to be warrant liabilities, and $695 of the fees that were considered related to liabilities were charged to other expense.

On March 16, 2018, the Company completed a reserved private placement agreement related to the issuance and sale of 2,500 shares of common stock for $4,200 ($3,587 net of expenses) to institutional purchasers at $1.68 per share. The purchase agreement is pursuant to the Company’s Form S-3 registration statement filed on August 17, 2016. The purchasers also received warrants to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock for $2.00 for up to 5 years from the date the transaction completed. The investment bankers for the transaction received warrants to purchase 88 shares of common stock for $2.02 for up to 5 years, the same terms as the investors. In addition, investment bankers from the May 22, 2017 reserved private placement received warrants to purchase 175 shares of common stock for $2.10 for up to 5 years pursuant to an exclusivity clause. Of the total net proceeds of $3,587, $3,023 were determined to be warrant liabilities, and $441 of the fees that were considered related to liabilities were charged to other expense.

As described in Note 3, the March 14, 2017, May 22, 2017 and March 16, 2018 warrants due to certain embedded features that preclude equity treatment are accounted for under liability accounting and are fair valued at each reporting period. The consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect adjustments consisting of establishing derivative liabilities of $3,351, offset by a corresponding reduction of stockholders’ equity (deficit) that includes reductions of $829 in accumulated deficit and $4,180 in additional paid-in-capital as of March 31, 2017. The Company uses the Black Scholes option pricing model for determining fair value of the warrants at the end of each period. As of March 31, 2018, the fair value of the derivative liabilities was $3,694.

On August 9, 2018, the Company entered into an Amendment to Common Stock Warrant with the institutional purchasers in the March 17, 2017 and May 22, 2017 that modified the purchase price of the March 17, 2017 warrants from $5.00 per share to $2.50 per share and modified the purchase price of the May 22, 2017 warrants from $5.50 per share to $2.50 per share. The reductions in the exercise prices resulted in charges resulting from the changes in fair value of the derivative liabilities of $845warrants for $1,760, and $1,63559 shares for the March 17 and May 22 warrants, respectively.exercise of stock options for $153.

 

On August 14, 2018, the Company completed a reserved private placement agreement related to the issuance and sale of 2,969 shares of common stock that raised $4,221 (net of fees) to institutional investors. The investors also received 2,969 warrants exercisable into common stock at an exercise price of $2.09. The Company also provided 208 warrants at an exercise priceaccrued $992 in consulting fees under a contract entered into February 2, 2021. A total of $1.92 to the investment banker in the transaction. The warrants due to certain embedded features that preclude equity treatment are accounted for115 shares were issued under liability accounting and are fair valued at each reporting period. The Company uses the Black Scholes option pricing model for determining fair value of the warrants at the end of each period. Of the total net proceeds of $4,221, $2,892 were determined to be warrant liabilities, and $322 of the fees that were considered related to liabilities were charged to other expense. A reduction in the exercise price to $1.34 for the March 16, 2018 and August 14, 2018 warrants resulted in a charge due to the change in fair value of the derivative liabilities of $260.

In the nine months ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 94 shares of common stock pursuant to stock awards granted from the 2013 Ecoark Holdings Incentive Stock Plan (“2013 Incentive Stock Plan”), net of 41 shares of common stock acquired from employees in lieu of amounts required to satisfy minimum withholding requirements upon vesting of the employees’ stock. The Company also issued 25 shares to an advisor to the Company pursuant to a stock award granted from the 2017 Ecoark Holdings Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan”).this contract on May 13, 2021.

 

As of March 31, 2019, 52,571 total2021, 22,705 shares of common stock were issued and 51,98622,588 shares of common stock were outstanding, net of 585117 treasury shares.

Additional Warrants

As discussed in Note 11, the Company issued warrants to convertible note holders that converted their notes intoof March 31, 2020, 17,175 shares of common stock in accordance with the amended secured convertible promissory note. The warrants were exercisable into 310issued and 17,058 shares of common stock with a strike pricewere outstanding, net of $7.50 per share and expired on December 31, 2018. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model, which incorporated a volatility of 82% and a discount yield of 1.27%.

F-31

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

On October 26, 2017, the Company entered into a consulting agreement for $8 per month unless otherwise terminated and agreed to issue warrants for 75 shares of common stock at $2.10 per share, vesting immediately with a term of five years.117 treasury shares.

 

Changes in the warrants are described in the table below for the years ended March 31:31, 2021 and 2020:

 

  2021 2020
  Number Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Number Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Beginning balance  1,624  $5.60   1,841  $10.60 
                 
Granted  2,675   7.69   2,685   3.60 
Exercised  (3,172)  (5.08)  (2,327)  (6.25)
Cancelled        (575)  (25.80)
Expired            
Ending balance  1,127  $10.46   1,624  $5.60 
Intrinsic value of warrants $2,988      $     
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  1.7       4.6     

  2019  2018 
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
Beginning balance  10,577  $4.37   5,789  $5.09 
                 
Granted  3,177  $2.00   4,888  $3.47 
Exercised Cashless  -       (49)    
Forfeited  -       (51)    
Expired  (4,547) $5.17   -     
Ending balance  9,206  $2.12   10,577  $4.37 
Intrinsic value of warrants $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  3.0       2.5     


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

 

Share-based Compensation Expense

 

Share-based compensation for employees is included in salaries and salary related costs and directors and services are included in professional fees and consulting in the consolidated statement of operations as follows for the years ended March 31:31, 2021 and 2020:

 

   2013 Incentive Stock Plan  2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan  Non-Qualified Stock Options  Common Stock  Warrants  Total 
2021                   
Directors  $        -  $      -  $300  $       -  $       -  $300 
Employees/Consultants   -   330   1,420   -   -   1,750 
Services   -   -   -   485   -   485 
   $-  $330  $1,720  $485  $-  $2,535 
                          
2020                         
Directors  $-  $200  $334  $-  $-  $534 
Employees   -   568   1,556   -   -   2,124 
Services   -   245   196   717   -   1,158 
   $-  $1,013  $2,086  $717  $-  $3,816 

  2013 Incentive Stock Plan  2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan  Non-Qualified Stock Options  Common Stock  Warrants  Total 
2019                  
Directors $-  $400  $-  $-  $-  $400 
Employees  270   356   2,066   -   -   2,692 
Services  -   (14)  -   -   -   (14)
  $270  $742  $2,066  $-  $-  $3,078 
                         
2018                        
Directors $-  $550  $-  $-  $-  $550 
Employees  16,701   2,707   1,184   1,500   -   22,092 
Services  181   307   -   -   108   596 
Services prepaid expense  1,714   -   -   -   -   1,714 
  $18,596  $3,564   1,184  $1,500  $108  $24,952 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20192021

 

Modification of Awards

 

During the three months ended December 31, 2017, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company issued option awards to individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. In addition, the Committee approved 2,909582 new option awards that vest over a four-year period to induce certain employees to accept the replacement options, to compensate them for diminution in value of their existing awards and in consideration of a number of other factors, including each individual’s role and responsibility with the Company, their years of service to the Company, and market precedents and standards for modification of equity awards. With respect to the replacement options, grantees agreed to exchange the existing awards covering 2,718544 shares of the Company’s common stock and were granted replacement options to purchase 2,926585 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants. In consideration of the agreements, the majority of replacement options vested immediately upon grant. The new option awards vest in 12twelve equal installments, with the first installment vesting on January 15, 2018, and additional installments vesting on the last day of each of the eleven successive three-month periods, subject to continued employment by the Company. The replacement options were issued under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan or 2013 Incentive Stock Plan to correspond with the plan under which the existing awards were issued. The new options were not granted under any of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans.

 

In accordance with ASU 2017-09Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting, the Company recognized the total compensation cost measured at the date of a modification which is the sum of the portion of the grant-date fair value of the original award for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered (or has already been rendered) at that date and the incremental cost resulting from the modification. The replacement and new options had a fair value of $10,290, of which $4,507 (including $3,286 of fair value adjustments to the new instruments) was recognized as share-based compensation in the three months ended December 31, 2017 and the remaining $5,783 will be recognized in periods through December 2021.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company issued option awards to individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. With respect to the replacement options, grantees agreed to exchange the existing awards covering 30060 shares of the Company’s common stock and were granted replacement options to purchase 30060 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants. The replacement options vest according to the original vesting schedule of the awards exchanged. The replacement options were issued under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan to correspond with the plan under which the existing awards were issued.

 

In accordance with ASU 2017-09Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting, the Company recognized the total compensation cost measured at the date of a modification which is the sum of the portion of the grant-date fair value of the original award for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered (or has already been rendered) at that date and the incremental cost resulting from the modification. The replacement options had a fair value of $467, which was less than the fair value of the existing awards exchanged and therefore an incremental share-based compensation cost was not recognized and the $467 will be recognized in periods through December 2018.

No modifications took place during the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2021

Non-Qualified Stock Options

 

As previously described, new option awards were granted to induce individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. The individuals were granted options to purchase 2,909582 shares of Company common stock that vest at a rate of 25% per year from 2018 to 2021, subject to continued employment by the Company. As with the replacement options, the new options have an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grant. Share-based compensation costs of $1,684 for grants not yet recognized will be recognized as expense through 2021, subject to any change for actual versus estimated forfeitures. The new options were not granted under any of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans, however they have terms consistent with terms of the plans.

 

The Company records share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 for employees and ASC 505 for non-employees. Management valued the options utilizing the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria: stock price - $2.60;$13.00; exercise price - $2.60;$13.00; expected term – 4 years; discount rate – 2.03%; and volatility – 97%.

 

As described further in Note 14,In 2019, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a former consultant which provided for the issuance of options for 7 sharesan option to purchase one share of common stock in addition to other terms. The options entitle the holders to purchase shares of common stock for $0.98$4.90 per share through November 2023. Management valued the options utilizing the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria: stock price - $0.98;$4.90; exercise price - $0.98;$4.90; expected term – 4 years; discount rate – 2.51%; and volatility – 148%.

In 2020, the Company granted 1,112 options to consultants, board members and employees for the non-qualified stock options as well as the options granted under the 2017 Omnibus plan below, that vest over time in service-based grants. The options were valued under the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria: stock price range of - $2.50 - $6.75; range of exercise price - $2.50 - $6.75; expected term – 4 years; discount rate – 1.12%; and volatility – average of 84%.

In 2021, the Company granted 121 options to consultants, board members and employees for the non-qualified stock options as well as the options granted under the 2017 Omnibus plan below, that vest over time in service-based grants. The options were valued under the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria: stock price range of - $10.00 - $19.45; range of exercise price - $10.00 - $19.45; expected term – 5 – 6.75 years; discount rate – 1.90 – 2.70%; and volatility – average of 60 - 91%.

Changes in the non-qualified stock options are described in the table below for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020: 

  2021  2020 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  1,644  $6.10   583  $13.00 
Granted  121   12.90   1,112   2.85 
Exercised  (115)  (2.92)  -     
Cancelled          (51)  (13.00)
Forfeited  -       -     
Ending balance  1,650  $6.84   1,644  $6.10 
Intrinsic value of options $10,044      $372     
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  7.73       8.7     


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

Changes in the non-qualified stock options are described in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
Beginning balance  2,909  $2.60   -     
Granted  7  $0.98   2,909  $2.60 
Exercised  -       -     
Expired  -       -     
Forfeited  -       -     
Ending balance  2,916  $2.60   2,909  $2.60 

Intrinsic value of options

 $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  8.5       9.5     

2013 Option Plan

On February 16, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Ecoark Inc. 2013 Stock Option Plan (the “2013 Option Plan”). The purposes of the 2013 Option Plan were to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants, and to promote the success of the business. The 2013 Option Plan was expected to contribute to the attainment of these objectives by offering employees, directors and consultants the opportunity to acquire stock ownership interests in Ecoark, and to thereby provide them with incentives to put forth maximum efforts for the success of Ecoark.

Awards under the 2013 Option Plan were only granted in the form of non-statutory stock options (“Options”) to purchase Ecoark’s Series C Stock prior to the Merger with MSC. Under the terms of the 2013 Option Plan and the Merger, the Options converted into the right to purchase shares of the Company.

In May 2014, Ecoark had granted Options to purchase 693 shares to various employees and consultants of Ecoark. The Options had an exercise price of $1.25 per share and have a term of 10 years. The Options were to vest over a three-year period as follows: 25% immediately; 25% on the first anniversary date; 25% on the second anniversary date; and 25% on the third anniversary date. During 2015 Ecoark issued additional Options on 625 shares of common stock. At the end of 2015, Options under the 2013 Option Plan were outstanding to purchase 1,318 shares of common stock. The total original number of Options on 1,318 Ecoark shares was divided by two in conjunction with the exchange ratio required by the Merger Agreement and converted to Options to purchase 659 shares of the Company (Holdings) with an adjusted exercise price of $2.50. In September 2016, the remaining vesting was accelerated to have those Options 100% vested. In 2016, the Company issued options to purchase 125 shares of stock at a strike price of $2.50 per share to a consultant. These options vested immediately and expired on March 31, 2018. In the Company’s fourth quarter of 2016, an option holder forfeited 125 options and thus, at December 31, 2016, Options on 659 shares of the Company were outstanding with an adjusted exercise price of $2.50. The Board of Directors adjusted the expiration date of these options to March 28, 2018. All unexercised options expired as of March 31, 2018.

Management valued the Options utilizing the Black-Scholes Method, with the following criteria: stock price - $2.50; exercise price - $2.50; expected term – 10 years; discount rate – 0.25%; and volatility – 55%.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

Changes in the Options under the 2013 Option Plan are described in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
  Number  Weighted
Average Exercise 
Price
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
Beginning balance  -       884  $2.50 
Granted  -       -     
Exercised  -       -     
Expired  -       (884) $2.50 
Forfeited  -       -     
Ending balance  -  $-   -  $- 
Intrinsic value of Options $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  -       -     

2021

 

2013 Incentive Stock Plan

 

The 2013 Incentive Stock Plan was registered on February 7, 2013. Under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan, the Company mayis authorized to grant incentive stock in the form of stock options, stock awards and stock purchase offers of up to 5,500 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant. At the time of the Merger, 5,497reverse acquisition of Magnolia Solar Corporation, 1,099 shares were available to issue under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan.

As previously described, during the three months ended March 31, 2018, new option awards were granted to individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. With respect to the replacement options, grantees agreed to exchange the existing awards covering 300 shares of the Company’s common stock and were granted 300 replacement options to purchase shares of Company common stock at an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants. The replacement options vest according to the original vesting schedule of the awards exchanged through December 2018. The replacement options were issued under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan to correspond with the plan under which the existing awards were issued.

Share-based compensation costs have been fully recognized as expense through December 31, 2018.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

 

The Company records share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 for employees and ASC 505 for non-employees. Management valued the options utilizing the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria ranges: stock price - $2.10 to $2.60 exercise price - $2.10 to $2.60; expected term – 4.0 to 5.2 years; discount rate – 2.22% to 2.7%; and volatility – 95 to 105%. Changesmodel. There were no options valued in the options under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan are described in the table below foreither of the years ended March 31:31, 2021 and 2020 as none were granted: 

 

  2019  2018 
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
Beginning balance  2,563  $2.52   -     
Granted  -       -     
Options granted in exchange for shares  -       2,563  $2.52 
Exercised  -       -     
Expired  -       -     
Forfeited  (210)      -     
Ending balance  2,353  $2.52   2,563  $2.52 
Intrinsic value of options $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  8.6       9.6     

  2021  2020 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  347  $13.00   471  $13.00 
Granted  -       -     
Options granted in exchange for shares  -       -     
Exercised  -       -     
Expired/Cancelled  -       (99)    
Forfeited  -       (25)    
Ending balance  347  $13.00   347  $13.00 
Intrinsic value of options $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  6.6       7.6     

 

A summary of the activity for service-based grants as of March 31, 2019 and 2018 is presented below for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
Beginning balance  105  $4.90   1,983  $4.90 
Granted  -             
Issued  (96)      (1,585)    
Expired  -       -     
Forfeited  (9)      (293)    
Options granted in exchange for shares  -             
Ending balance  -  $-   105  $4.90 
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  -       0.8     

A reconciliation of the shares available and issued under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan is presented in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
Beginning available  235   11 
Shares modified to options  -   2,493 
Options in exchange for shares  -   (2,563)
Shares forfeited  219   294 
Ending available  454   235 
         
Vested stock awards  2,353   4,799 
         
Beginning number of shares issued  2,585   1,000 
Issued  96   1,585 
Cancelled  -   - 
Ending number of shares issued  2,681   2,585 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20192021

There were no service-based grants outstanding as of March 31, 2021 and 2020.

The Company has not granted any options or RSU’s under this plan in several years and is not intending to do so.

Under this plan, there remains 215 options available to issue.

 

2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan

 

The 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan was registered on June 14, 2017. Under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company may grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, and other awards. Awards of up to 4,000800 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are availableauthorized for issuance under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant.  

 

As previously described, new option awards were granted to individuals in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards previously granted. With respect to the replacement options, grantees agreed to exchange the existing awards covering 525105 shares of the Company’s common stock and were granted 663133 replacement options to purchase shares of Company common stock at an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants. In consideration of the agreements, the majority of the replacement options vested immediately upon grant. The remaining replacement options will vestvested in equal installments through July 2020, subject to continued employment by the Company.

 

Share-based compensation costs of approximately $629$1,206 for grants not yet recognized will be recognized as expense through October 2023June 2024 subject to any changes for actual versus estimated forfeitures.

The Company records share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 for employees and ASC 505 for non-employees. Management valued the options utilizing the Black-Scholes model with the following criteria ranges: stock price - $1.61 to $3.76 exercise price - $1.61 to $3.76; expected term – ten years in the first two quarters and four years in the last two quarters; discount rate – 1.99% to 2.65%; and volatility – 89 to 103%. Changes in the options under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan are described in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  1,374  $2.76   -     
Granted  1,034  $0.93   911  $2.44 
Shares modified to options  -   -   663  $3.00 
Exercised  -       -     
Expired  -       (8)    
Forfeited  (538)      (192)    
Ending balance  1,870  $1.54   1,374  $2.76 
Intrinsic value of options $-             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  9.2       9.5     

 

A summary of the activity for performance-based RSUs as of March 31, 2019 and since inception in June 2017 is presented below for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise 
Price
 
Beginning balance  -       -     
Granted  -       135  $3.36 
Exercised  -       -     
Expired  -       -     
Forfeited  -       (135) $3.36 
Ending balance  -  $-   -  $- 
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  -       -     


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20192021

  

  2021  2020 
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Number  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Beginning balance  534  $7.70   374  $7.70 
Granted  75   11.61   176   6.05 
Shares modified to options  -   -   -   - 
Exercised  (35)      -     
Cancelled  (129)      (16)    
Forfeited  -       -     
Ending balance  445  $8.24   534  $7.70 
Intrinsic value of options $1,739             
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  7.2       9.2     

A summary of the activity for

There were no service-based RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 20192020 and since inception75 in June 2017 is presented below for the years ended March 31:2021.

 

  2019  2018 
  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Number  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
Beginning balance  50  $2.60   -     
Granted  -       1,381  $3.30 
Issued  (25)      (465)    
Expired  -       -     
Forfeited  (25)      (341)    
Options granted in exchange  -       (525)    
Ending balance  -  $-   50  $2.60 
                 
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  -       9.3     

Additional information regarding the RSUs is presented in the table below as of and for the years ended March 31:Under this plan, there remains 222 options available to issue.

 

  2019  2018 
Total market value of shares/units vested $   -  $    - 
Share-based compensation expense for RSUs $(254) $609 
Total tax benefit related to RSU share-based compensation expense $-  $- 
Cash tax benefits realized for tax deductions for RSUs $-  $- 

 

At March 31, 2019, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs with a weighted average vesting period of 0 years. At March 31, 2018, there was $314 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs with a weighted average vesting period of 0.2 years.

A reconciliation of the total shares available and issued under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan is presented in the table below for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
Beginning available  2,111   4,000 
Shares granted  (1,034)  (2,427)
Shares modified to options  -   525 
Options in exchange for shares  (-)  (663)
Shares expired  -   8 
Shares forfeited  538   668 
Ending available  1,615   2,111 
         
Vested stock awards  905   1,066 
         
Beginning number of shares issued  465   - 
Issued  25   465 
Cancelled  -   - 
Ending number of shares issued  490   465 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 20192021

 

NOTE 14: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Legal Proceedings

 

On August 1, 2018, Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Zest Labs, Inc. filed a complaint against Walmart Inc.We are presently involved in the United States District Court forfollowing legal proceedings in Arkansas and Florida. To the Eastern Districtbest of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violationour knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. Ecoark Holdings and Zest Labsour properties or businesses are seeking monetary damages and other related reliefsubject, which would reasonably be likely to the extent it is deemed proper by the court. The Company does not believe that expenses incurred in pursuing the complaint will have a material adverse effect on the Company.

On August 1, 2018, Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Zest Labs, Inc. filed a complaint against Walmart Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division. The complaint includes claims for violation of the Arkansas Trade Secrets Act, violation of the Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, breach of contract, unfair competition, unjust enrichment, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion and fraud. On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest a total of $115 million in damages which includes $65 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. liable on three claims. The federal jury found that Walmart Inc. misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. The Company has filed post-trial motions to add an award for their attorneys’ fees as the prevailing party in the litigation. 

On December 12, 2018, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in Sarasota County, Florida by certain investors who invested in the Company before it was public. The complaint alleges that the investment advisors who solicited the investors to invest into the Company made omissions and misrepresentations concerning the Company and the shares. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint which is pending.

In the opinion of management, there are no legal matters involving us that would have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s net income or financial condition, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019results of operations or any individual fiscal quarter. On October 22, 2018, the Court issued an order setting a trial date of June 1, 2020. The order also established deadlines for the completion of fact discovery by October 15, 2019, opening expert reports on October 24, 2019, and dispositive motions, on January 22, 2020. The case is presently in the fact discovery phase.

On December 12, 2018, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Twelfth Judicial Circuit in Sarasota County, Florida by certain investors who invested in the Company before it was public. The complaint alleges that the investment advisors who solicited the investors to invest into the Company made omissions and misrepresentations concerning the Company and the shares. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint which is pending. 

On June 20, 2018, a complaint against the Company and certain affiliates was filed by a former consultant in the U.S. District Court - Northern District of California. The complaint refers to an advisory agreement dated January 1, 2015 with Ecoark, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, in which the former consultant was to provide advice and consultation to Ecoark, Inc. in exchange for consulting fees, expenses and a warrant to purchase equity in Ecoark, Inc. The matter was settled in January 2019. The Company recorded a charge of $20 in connection with the settlement of the matter.

cash flows.

 

Operating LeasesJoint Participation Agreement

The Company leases many of its operating and office facilities for various terms under long-term, non-cancelable operating lease agreements. These leases expire at various dates through 2020. Rent expense was as follows for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
Continuing operations $242  $346 
Discontinued operations  96   25 
Total $338  $371 

Future minimum lease payments required under the operating leases for continuing operations are as follows:On October 9, 2020, - $127.On adoption of ASC 842Leases beginning April 1, 2019, the Company currently expectsand White River SPV, entered into a Participation Agreement (the “Participation Agreement”) by and among the Company, White River SPV, BlackBrush Oil & Gas, L.P. (“BlackBrush”) and GeoTerre, LLC, an unrelated privately-held limited liability company (the “Assignor”), torecognize additional operating liabilities conduct drilling of approximately $121, with corresponding right of use assets of $112 based onwells in the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under leasing standards for existing operating leases.Austin Chalk formation.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

RoyaltiesPursuant to the Participation Agreement, the Company and White River SPV funded 100% of the cost, approximately $5,800, associated with the drilling and completion of an initial deep horizontal well in the Austin Chalk formation. The Participation Agreement required the drilling costs that were paid into a designated escrow account at the commencement of the drilling in January 2021, which it was. BlackBrush agreed to assign to the other parties to the Participation Agreement, subject to certain exceptions and limitations specified therein, specified portions of its leasehold working interest in certain Austin Chalk formation units. The Participation Agreement provides for an initial allocation of the working interests and net revenue interests among the assignor, BlackBrush and the Company and then a re-allocation upon payout or payment of drilling and completion costs for each well drilled. Prior to payout, the Company will own 90% of the working interest and 67.5% of the net revenue interest in each well. Following payout, the Company will own 70% of working interest and 52.5% net revenue interest in each well.

The Parties to the Participation Agreement, except for the Company, has cross-licensing agreementshad previously entered into a Joint Operating Agreement, dated September 4, 2020 (the “Operating Agreement”) establishing an area of mutual interest, including the Austin Chalk formation, and governing the parties’ rights and obligations with several technology companiesrespect to drilling, completion and operation of wells therein. The Participation Agreement and the Operating Agreement require, among other things, that require paymentWhite River SPV and the Company drill and complete at least one horizontal Austin Chalk well with a certain minimum lateral each calendar year and/or maintain leasehold by paying its proportionate share of royalties upon the sale and or use of certain patented technologies. One of these agreements requires minimum annual payments of $50 until the last of the patents expire.any rental payments.

 

NOTE 15: INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC Topic 740: Income Taxes which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for both the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax losses and tax credit carryforwards.  ASC Topic 740 additionally requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets. The Company has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes totaling approximately $98,293 at March 31, 2019, expiring through the year 2039. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 places a limitation on the amount of taxable income that can be offset by carryforwards after certain ownership shifts. During fiscal year 2019, the Company has not reviewed, if an ownership change has occurred, as of the statement date. If such a change has occurred, the new operation losses could be limited or eliminated.

The table below summarizes the differences between the tax benefit computed at the statutory federal tax rate and the Company’s net income tax benefit for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
Tax benefit computed at expected statutory rate $(2,867) $(10,343)
State income taxes  2   22 
Permanent differences:        
Share-based compensation  182   1,288 
Goodwill impairment  -   226 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (664)  (3,261)
Temporary differences:        
Share-based compensation  546   2,289 
Property and equipment  (48)  399 
Intangible assets  640   232 
Other adjustments  42   (66)
Increase in valuation allowance  2,169   9,214 
Net income tax benefit $-  $- 

The table below summarizes the differences between the statutory federal rate and the Company’s effective tax rate as follows for the years ended March 31:

  2019  2018 
Federal statutory rate (benefit)  (21.0)%  (31.5)%
Temporary differences  (3.5)%  (15.2)%
Permanent differences  8.6%  24.8%
Change in valuation allowance  15.9%  21.9%
Effective Tax Rate  0%  0%

The Company has deferred tax assets which are summarized as follows at March 31:

  2019  2018 
Net operating loss carryover $23,327  $23,230 
Depreciable and amortizable assets  1,761   1,168 
Share-based compensation  3,586   2,858 
Accrued liabilities  57   58 
Inventory reserve  -   3 
Allowance for bad debts  120   13 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (2,884)  (1,956)
Effect of reduction in tax rate  -   (994)
Other  381   328 
Less: valuation allowance  (26,348)  (24,708)
Net deferred tax asset $-  $- 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2019

After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has recorded a full valuation allowance at March 31, 2019, due to the uncertainty of realizing the deferred income tax assets. The valuation was increased by approximately $1,640 as a result of $3,874 of differences relating to fiscal 2019 operations. The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions and has not received any notices from tax authorities.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, (the “TCJA”) was enacted.  The TCJA includes a number of changes to existing U.S. tax laws that impact the Company, most notably a reduction of the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset, and therefore, the tax effects of the of enactment of the TCJA as written did not result in a remeasurement of the Company’s net deferred tax asset.

NOTE 16: CONCENTRATIONS

 

Customer Concentration of Credit Risk.The Company’s customer base for its Zest Lab products is concentrated with a small number of customers. The Company does not generally require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. To reduce credit risk,. Three and two customers, all in the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations on its customers’ financial condition. The Company establishes allowances for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of customers, historical trends and other information. J. Terrence Thompsoncommodity segment accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable asbalance at March 31, 2021 and 2020 for a total of 76% and 63% of accounts receivable, respectively. In addition, two customers represent approximately 69% and 32% of total revenues for the Company for the years ended March 201931, 2021 and 2018.2020, respectively.

Supplier Concentration.Concentration. Certain of the raw materials, components and equipment used by the Company in the manufacture of its products are available from single-sourced vendors. Shortages could occur in these essential materials and components due to an interruption of supply or increased demand in the industry. If the Company were unable to procure certain materials, components or equipment at acceptable prices, it would be required to reduce its manufacturing operations, which could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations. In addition, the Company may make prepayments to certain suppliers or enter into minimum volume commitment agreements. Should these suppliers be unable to deliver on their obligations or experience financial difficulty, the Company may not be able to recover these prepayments.

 

The Company occasionally maintains cash balances in excess of the FDIC insured limit. The Company does not consider this risk to be material.

 

Commodity price risk

We are exposed to fluctuations in commodity prices for oil and natural gas. Commodity prices are affected by many factors, including but not limited to, supply and demand.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

NOTE 17: ACQUISITION OF 440labs16: ACQUISITIONS

Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc.

 

On May 18, 2017,31, 2019, the Company entered into an exchange agreementAgreement and Plan of Merger (the “Exchange“Merger Agreement”) with Zest Labs, 440labs, SphereIt, LLC,Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Massachusetts limited liability companyDelaware corporation (“SphereIt”Trend Holdings”) for the Company to acquire 100% of Trend Holdings pursuant to a merger of Trend Holdings with and threeinto the Company (the “Merger”). The Merger was completed as agreed in the Merger Agreement, the Company is the surviving entity in the Merger and the separate corporate existence of 440labs’ executive employees.Trend Holdings has ceased to exist. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, on May 23, 2017 the Company acquired allMerger, each of the 1,000 issued and outstanding shares of 440labs in exchange for 300common stock of Trend Holdings was converted into 1,100 shares of the Company’s common stock issued to SphereIt. 440labs’ three executive employees signed employment agreements pursuant to which each of the three executive employees received 100 shares of the Company’s common stock and became employed by Zest Labs.

stock. No cash was paid relating to the acquisition of 440labs. 440labs is a software development and information solutions provider for cloud, mobile, and IoT applications. 440labs’ experienced leadership and engineering teams will augment Zest Labs’ development of modern, enterprise scale solutions that robustly connect to distributed IoT deployments. 440labs blends onshore and offshore resources to optimize development and provide extended runtime operations coverage, critical to broad-based deployments.acquisition.

 

The Company acquired the assets and liabilities noted below in exchange for the 3001,100 shares and accounted for the acquisition in accordance with ASC 805. Based on the fair values at the effective date of acquisition the purchase price was recorded as follows:

 

Cash $3 
Receivables  10 
Other assets  1 
Goodwill  3,223 
  $3,237 

Identifiable intangible assets $1,435 
Goodwill  65 
  $1,500 

The Acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total acquisition consideration price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their preliminary estimated fair values. The fair value measurements utilize estimates based on key assumptions of the Acquisition, and historical and current market data. The excess of the purchase price over the total of estimated fair values assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. In order to ultimately determine the fair values of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Trend Holdings, we have engaged a third-party independent valuation specialist. The Company has recognized the purchase price allocations based on historical inputs and data as of May 31, 2019.

 

The primary business of 440labs is providing development services to Zest Labs. In consolidation, the revenues of 440labs prior to the acquisition would have been eliminated against the expenses of Zest Labs that were paid to 440labs, resulting in an insignificant impact to the net lossesallocation of the Company. purchase price is based on the best information available, amongst other things: (i) the valuation of the fair values and useful lives of tangible assets acquired; (ii) valuations and useful lives for intangible assets; (iii) valuation of accounts payable and accrued expenses; and (iv) the fair value of non-cash consideration.

The Company had an independent valuation consultant confirm the valuation of Trend Holdings and the allocation of the intangible assets, and there were no changes from the preliminary estimates.

The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill was tested for impairment

Banner Midstream

On March 27, 2020, the Company and written off inBanner Parent, entered into the quarter ended March 31, 2018 along withBanner Purchase Agreement to acquire Banner Midstream. Pursuant to the intangible asset related to oneacquisition, Banner Midstream became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the executive employees who resigned fromCompany and Banner Parent received shares of the Company.Company’s common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Banner Midstream.


F-43

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


MARCH 31, 20192021

 

The Company issued 1,789 shares of common stock (which Banner Parent issued to certain of its noteholders) and assumed $11,774 in debt and lease liabilities of Banner Midstream. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and another director recused themselves from all board discussions on the acquisition of Banner Midstream as they are stockholders and/or noteholders of Banner Midstream. The transaction was approved by all of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the Company. Effective at the closing of this transaction, the Chairman and CEO of Banner Parent was appointed Principal Accounting Officer of the Company and became the Chief Executive Officer and President of Banner Midstream. 

The Company acquired the assets and liabilities noted below in exchange for the 1,789 shares of common stock and accounted for the acquisition in accordance with ASC 805. Based on the fair values at the effective date of acquisition the purchase price was recorded as follows:

Cash (including restricted cash) $205 
Accounts receivables  110 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  585 
Machinery and equipment  3,426 
Oil and gas properties  6,135 
Customer relationships  2,100 
Trade name  250 
Right of use assets  731 
Assets of discontinued operations  249 
Goodwill  7,002 
Intercompany advance  (1,000)
Accounts payable  (268)
Accrued liabilities  (2,362)
Due to prior owners  (2,362)
Lease liabilities  (732)
Liabilities of discontinued operations  (228)
Asset retirement obligation  (295)
Notes payable – related parties  (1,844)
Long-term debt  (6,836)
  $4,866 

The consideration paid for Banner Midstream was in the form of 1,789 shares of stock at a fair value of $2.72 per share or $4,866. The Company had an independent valuation consultant perform a valuation of Banner Midstream.

The Acquisition has been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total acquisition consideration price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their preliminary estimated fair values. The fair value measurements utilize estimates based on key assumptions of the Acquisition, and historical and current market data. The excess of the purchase price over the total of the estimated fair values assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. In order to determine the fair values of tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Banner Midstream, we have engaged a third-party independent valuation specialist. The Company has estimated the preliminary purchase price allocations based on historical inputs and data as of March 27, 2020. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based on the best information available, amongst other things: (i) the finalization of the valuation of the fair values and useful lives of tangible assets acquired; (ii) the finalization of the valuations and useful lives for the reserves and intangible assets acquired; (iii) finalization of the valuation of accounts payable and accrued expenses; and (iv) finalization of the fair value of non-cash consideration.

Effective, March 27, 2021, the Company received an independent assessment to finalize the asset allocation of the acquisition of Banner Midstream, and there were no changes to the preliminary estimates.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

The following table shows the unaudited pro-forma results for the year ended March 31, 2020, as if the acquisitions had occurred on April 1, 2019. These unaudited pro forma results of operations are based on the historical financial statements and related notes of Trend Holdings, Banner Midstream (which includes White River and Shamrock) and the Company.

  Year Ended
March 31,
2020
 
  (Unaudited) 
Revenues $7,788 
Net loss $(15,540)
Net loss per share $(1.27)

Energy Assets

On June 11, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SR Acquisition I, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of 262 total wells in Mississippi and Louisiana, approximately 9,000 acres of active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment. The 262 total wells include 57 active producing wells, 19 active disposal wells, 136 shut-in with future utility wells, and 50 shut-in pending plugging wells. Included in the assignment are 4 wells in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale formation.

On June 18, 2020, the Company acquired certain energy assets from SN TMS, LLC for $1 as part of the ongoing bankruptcy reorganization of Sanchez Energy Corporation. The transaction includes the transfer of wells, active mineral leases, and drilling production materials and equipment.

The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the Rabb Resources, LTD. historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

Rabb Resources

On August 14, 2020, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, White River E&P LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company Rabb Resources, LTD. and Claude Rabb, the sole owner of Rabb Resources, LTD. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company completed the acquisition of certain assets of Rabb Resources, LTD. The acquired assets consisted of certain real property and working interests in oil and gas mineral leases. The Company in June 2020 previously provided for bridge financing to Rabb Resources, LTD under the $225 Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Note. As consideration for entering into the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to pay Rabb Resources, LTD. A total of $3,500 consisting of (i) $1,500 in cash, net of $304 in outstanding amounts related to the note receivable and accrued interest receivable, and (ii) $2,000 payable in common stock of the Company, which based on the closing price of the common stock as of the date of the Asset Purchase Agreement equaled 103 shares. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the Rabb Resources, LTD. historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

Building $236 
Land  140 
Oil and Gas Properties  3,224 
Asset retirement obligation  (100)
  $3,500 

Unrelated Third Party

On September 4, 2020, White River SPV 3, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Banner Midstream entered into an Agreement and Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease with GeoTerre Operating, LLC, a privately held limited liability company (the “Assignor”). Under the Lease Assignment, the Assignor assigned a 100% working interest (75% net revenue interest) in a certain oil and gas lease covering in excess of 1,600 acres (the “Lease”), and White River paid $1,500 in cash to the Assignor. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

O’Neal Family

On September 30, 2020, the Company and White River Energy, LLC entered into three asset purchase agreements (the “Asset Purchase Agreements”) with privately-held limited liability companies to acquire working interests in the Harry O’Neal oil and gas mineral lease (the “O’Neal OGML”), the related well bore, crude oil inventory and equipment. Immediately prior to the acquisition, White River Energy owned an approximately 61% working interest in the O’Neal OGML oil well and a 100% working interest in any future wells.

The purchase prices of these leases were $126, $312 and $312, respectively, totaling $750. The consideration paid to the Sellers was in the form of 68 shares of common stock. The Company accounted for this acquisition as an asset acquisition under ASC 805 and that the Company has early adopted the amendments of Regulation S-X dated May 21, 2020 and has concluded that this acquisition was not significant. Accordingly, as a result of the amendment, the presentation of the historical financial statements under Rule 3-05 and related pro forma information under Article 11 of Regulation S-X, respectively, were not required to be presented.

Oil and Gas Properties $760 
Asset retirement obligation  (10)
  $750 


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

NOTE 18:17: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The Company measures and discloses the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the fair value hierarchy prescribed by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fair value hierarchy has three levels, which are based on reliable available inputs of observable data. The hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The three-level hierarchy is defined as follows:

 

Level 1 – quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;

 

Level 2 – quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

 

Level 3 – fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

 

Financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, notes payable, and amounts due to related parties. The fair value of cash is determined based on Level 1 inputs. There were no transfers into or out of “Level 3” during the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective relatively short maturity dates or durations.

 

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. The Company records the fair value of the of the warrant derivative liabilities disclosed in Note 9 in accordance with ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging. The fair values of the derivatives were calculated using the Black-Scholes Model. The fair value of the derivative liabilities is revalued on each balance sheet date with corresponding gains and losses recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations. 

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis as of:

 Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total Gains
and (Losses)
 
March 31, 2021            
Warrant derivative liabilities  -   -  $7,213  $(18,518)
                 
March 31, 2020                
Warrant derivative liabilities  -   -  $2,775  $(369)

NOTE 18: SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 280-10 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This standard requires that companies disclose operating segments based on the manner in which management disaggregates the Company in making operating decisions. As of March 31, 2021 and 2020, and for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company operated in three segments. The segments are Financial Services (Trend Holdings), Technology (Zest Labs (which includes the operations of 440IoT Inc.)), and Commodities (Banner Midstream).

F-47

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

Year Ended March 31, 2021 Commodities  Financial  Technology  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $15,085  $478  $-  $15,563 
Cost of revenues  14,727   -   -   14,727 
Gross profit  358   478   -   836 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation, amortization, depletion and accretion  13,894   476   3,165   17,535 
Depreciation, amortization, depletion and accretion  1,652   -   250   1,902 
Other (income) expense  2,183   17   87   2,287 
Income (loss) from continuing operations $(17,371) $(15) $(3,502) $(20,888)
                 
Segmented assets as of March 31, 2021                
Property and equipment, net $3,403  $-  $292  $3,695 
Oil and Gas Properties/Capitalized drilling costs $14,919  $-  $-  $14,919 
Intangible assets, net $2,065  $-  $-  $2,065 
Goodwill $7,002  $3,223  $-  $10,225 
Capital expenditures $617  $-  $-  $617 

Year Ended March 31, 2020 Commodities  Financial  Technology  Total 
Segmented operating revenues $233  $175  $173  $581 
Cost of revenues  94   -   165   259 
Gross profit  139   175   8   322 
Total operating expenses net of depreciation, amortization, and impairment  66   729   9,048   9,843 
Depreciation and amortization  4   -   282   286 
Other expense  17   -   2,315   2,332 
Loss from continuing operations $52  $(554) $(11,637) $(12,139)
                 
Segmented assets as of March 31, 2020                
Property and equipment, net $3,423  $-  $542  $3,965 
Oil and Gas Properties $6,135  $-  $-  $6,135 
Intangible assets, net $2,350  $-  $-  $2,350 
Goodwill $7,002  $3,223  $-  $10,225 
Capital expenditures $-  $-  $-  $- 

NOTE 19: LEASES

The Company has adopted ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as of April 1, 2019 and will account for their leases in terms of the right of use assets and offsetting lease liability obligations under this pronouncement. The Company had had only short-term leases up through the acquisition of Banner Midstream. The Company acquired a right of use asset and lease liability of $731 and $732, respectively on March 27, 2020. The Company recorded these amounts at present value, in accordance with the standard, using discount rates ranging between 2.5% and 6.8%. The right of use asset is composed of the sum of all lease payments, at present value, and is amortized straight line over the life of the expected lease term. For the expected term of the lease the Company used the initial terms ranging between 42 and 60 months. Upon the election by the Company to extend the lease for additional years, that election will be treated as a lease modification and the lease will be reviewed for remeasurement. This lease will be treated as an operating lease under the new standard. In addition, the Company entered into a new 39 month operating lease for office space in September 2020 as well as a new 36 month operating lease in March 2021 which are also included in the right of use asset and lease liabilities. 

F-48

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

The Company has chosen to implement this standard using the modified retrospective model approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment, which does not require the Company to adjust the comparative periods presented when transitioning to the new guidance. The Company has also elected to utilize the transition related practical expedients permitted by the new standard. The modified retrospective approach provides a method for recording existing leases at adoption and in comparative periods that approximates the results of a modified retrospective approach. Adoption of the new standard did not result in an adjustment to retained earnings for the Company.

The Company’s portfolio of leases contains both finance and operating leases that relate primarily to the commodity segment. As of March 31, 2021, the value of the unamortized lease right of use asset is $924, of which $445 is from financing leases (through maturity at June 30, 2024) and $479 is from operating leases (through maturity at November 30, 2023). As of March 31, 2021, the Company’s lease liability was $957, of which $436 is from financing leases and $521 is from operating leases.

Maturity of lease liability for the operating leases for the period ended March 31,
2022 $218 
2023 $194 
2024 $120 
2025 $- 
Imputed interest $(11)
     
Total lease liability $521 

Disclosed as:
Current portion $212 
Non-current portion $309 

Maturity of lease liability for the financing leases for the period ended March 31,
2022 $151 
2023 $151 
2024 $134 
2025 $19 
Imputed interest $(19)
     
Total lease liability $436 

Disclosed as:
Current portion $141 
Non-current portion $295 

Amortization of the right of use asset for the period ended March 31,
2022 $339 
2023 $323 
2024 $244 
2025 $18 
     
Total $924 

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

Total Lease Cost

Individual components of the total lease cost incurred by the Company is as follows:

  Year ended
March 31,
2021
  Year ended
March 31,
2020
 
Operating lease expense $162  $       - 
         
Finance lease expense        
Depreciation of capitalized finance lease assets  137   - 
Interest expense on finance lease liabilities  14   - 
Total lease cost $313  $- 

NOTE 20: ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

In conjunction with the approval permitting the Company to resume drilling in the existing fields, the Company has recorded an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) based upon the plan submitted in connection with the permit. The ARO results from the Company’s responsibility to abandon and reclaim their net share of all working interest properties and facilities. The following table summarizes activity in the Company’s ARO for the periods ended March 31, 2021 and 2020:

  March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
Balance, beginning of period $295  $- 
Accretion expense  64   - 
ARO liability acquired in Banner Midstream acquisition  -   295 
Reclamation obligations settled  -   - 
Additions  111   - 
Additions and changes in estimates  1,062   - 
Balance, end of period $1,532  $295 

Total ARO at March 31, 2021 and 2020 shown in the table above consists of amounts for future plugging and abandonment liabilities on our wellbores and facilities based on third-party estimates of such costs, adjusted for inflation for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These values are discounted to present value at 10% per annum for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020. 

NOTE 21: INCOME TAXES

The following table summarizes the significant differences between the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate for financial statement purposes for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020:

  2021  2020 
Federal income taxes at statutory rate  21.00%  21.00%
State income taxes at statutory rate  3.23%  2.40%
Permanent differences  7.66%  3.30%
Change in valuation allowance  (31.89)%  5.70%
Totals  0.00%  32.40%

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
MARCH 31, 2021

The following is a summary of the net deferred tax asset (liability) as of March 31, 2021 and 2020:

  As of  As of 
  March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
Deferred tax assets:      
Net operating losses $29,596  $25,659 
Accrued expenses  57   42 
Stock options  5,349   4,548 
ROU Liability  224   - 
Other  166   2,366 
Total deferred tax assets  35,392   32,615 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Intangible assets  (1,630)  (2,185)
ROU Assets  (216)  - 
Other  (94)  (802)
         
Total deferred tax liabilities  (1,940)  (2,987)
   33,452   29,628 
Valuation allowance  (33,452)  (29,628)
         
Net deferred tax assets/liabilities $-  $- 

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code provides an annual limitation on the amount of federal NOLs and tax credits that may be used in the event of an ownership change. The Company had a net operating loss carryforward totaling approximately $126,641 at March 31, 2021.

The Company classifies accrued interest and penalties, if any, for unrecognized tax benefits as part of income tax expense. The Company did not accrue any penalties or interest as of March 31, 2021 and 2020

The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the year ended March 31: 31, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:

 

2019 Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total Gains and (Losses) 

Warrant derivative liabilities

  -   -  $3,104  $3,160 
                 
2018            

Warrant derivative liabilities

  -   -  $3,694  $9,316 
Current$       -$      -
Deferred--
Total$-$-

 

The Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions and has not received any notices from tax authorities.


NOTE 19: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS22: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Subsequent to MarchOn May 31, 2019 the Company has drawnentered into an additional $905Agreement and Plan of Merger with Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) pursuant to which the Company acquired 100% of Trend Holdings in a merger with the Company as the surviving entity. Pursuant to the merger, the one thousand issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Trend Holdings were converted into 1,100 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an approximate dollar value of $16,775 based on the credit facility described in Note 10. Gary Metzger, Lead Director, has advancedclosing price per share of Common Stock of $15.25 on the closing date of the merger. William B. Hoagland, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, was President and a principal stockholder of Trend Holdings and received 550 shares of Common Stock, having a total value of $8,388, pursuant to the merger.

Jay Puchir, the Company’s Treasurer, served as a consultant to the Company from May 2019 to March 2020 and was paid solely in stock options totaling 40 stock options at an exercise price of $3.15 per share. In addition, any outstanding notes with Mr. Puchir have been repaid as of March 31, 2021 along with all accrued interest.

Gary Metzger, a director, advanced approximately $328 to the Company through March 31, 2021, under the terms of a note payable that bears 10% simple interest per annum, and isthe principal balance along with accrued interest was payable July 30, 2020.2020 or upon demand. Interest expense on the notes through March 31, 2021 was approximately $59 and the Company repaid $51 in interest leaving $8 in accrued interest at March 31, 2021. In addition, the Company assumed approximately $250 in notes entered into in March 2020 which remains outstanding at March 31, 2021. The Company collectedincurred $37 in interest expense and repaid $28 in interest leaving $9 in accrued interest at March 31, 2021 via the remaining amounts dueacquisition of Banner Midstream Corp. (“Banner Midstream”) from Kal-Polymers Americas forMr. Metzger at 15% interest. Mr. Metzger has waived any default provisions in the salenote and will accept a repayment of all outstanding principal and interest when the Company elects to make payment.

On March 27, 2020, the Company issued 1,789 shares of its common stock to Banner Energy Services, Inc. (“Banner Energy”) and assumed approximately $11,774 in debt and lease liabilities of Banner Midstream. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and another director, John Cahill, recused themselves from all board discussions on the acquisition of Banner Midstream as they were stockholders and/or noteholders of Banner Midstream. The transaction was approved by all of the Sable assets.disinterested members of the Board. The Chairman and CEO of Banner Energy is the Treasurer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer and President of Banner Midstream. Included in the shares issued in this transaction, John Cahill received 164 shares of common stock and Jay Puchir received 548 shares of common stock. At the time of this transaction, Mr. Cahill and his brother were also members of Shamrock Upstream Energy LLC, a subsidiary of Banner Midstream.

In the Banner Midstream acquisition, Randy S. May, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, was the holder of approximately $1,242 in notes payable by Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries, which were assumed by the Company in the transaction. Additionally, Mr. May held a note payable by Banner Energy in the amount of $2,000 in principal and accrued interest, which was converted into 2,740 shares of Common Stock (on a pre-reverse stock split basis) as a result of the transaction. Neither of these amounts remain outstanding.

NOTE 23: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to March 31, 2021, the Company had the following transactions:

On April 9, 2021, a Little Rock, Arkansas jury awarded Ecoark and Zest a total of $115 million in damages which includes $65 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitive damages and found Walmart Inc. liable on three counts. The federal jury found that Walmart Inc. misappropriated Zest’s trade secrets, failed to comply with a written contract, and acted willfully and maliciously in misappropriating Zest’s trade secrets. The Company has filed post-trial motions to add an award for their attorneys’ fees as the prevailing party in the litigation. 

 

The Company acquired Trend Discovery Holdings, Inc.,accrued $675 in consulting fees under a fund management companycontract entered into February 2, 2021. A total of 115 shares were issued under this contract on May 31, 2019.April 13, 2021.

 

On July 12, 2019,May 13, 2021, the Company’s subsidiaries White River Energy LLC and White River Operating LLC entered into a Letter Agreement for a .60 of 8/8th Earned Working Interest with TSEA Partners LLC (“TSEA”) for their Harry O’Neal 20-10 lease in Holmes County, MS (“Letter Agreement”). Under the terms of the Letter Agreement, TSEA paid $600 to the Company enteredto transfer the working interest to TSEA and TSEA received a $300 drilling or workover credit to use towards any authority for expenditure at Horseshoe Field.

On June 22, 2021, 10 options were exercised into 10 common shares for $28, and 10 shares will be issued for the cashless exercise of 12 options. The 20 shares have not been issued as of the date of filing.

F-52

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2021

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)

The following supplemental unaudited information regarding the Company’s oil and gas activities is presented pursuant to the disclosure requirements of ASC 932. All of the Company’s activities are in the United States.

The Company has performed due diligence in addition to the determination of estimated proved producing reserves on over 20,000 acres of oil and gas mineral rights, both shallow and deep levels and identified an Exchange Agreementestimated recoverable cumulative production of 2,654,865 barrels of oil at the SEC price deck of $40.01/Bbl and 4,896,826 barrels of oil at $58.00/Bbl based on analogous and comparative proved produced production in nearby areas. This due diligence is not included in any of the amounts provided as of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020.

Results of Operations

Results of Operations March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
       
Sales $2,363  $     - 
Lease operating costs  (9,476)  - 
Depletion, accretion and impairment  (933)  - 
  $(8,046) $- 

Reserve Quantity Information

The supplemental unaudited presentation of proved reserve quantities and related standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows provides estimates only and does not purport to reflect realizable values or fair market values of the Company’s reserves. The Company emphasizes that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and that estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise than those of producing oil and gas properties. Accordingly, significant changes to these estimates can be expected as future information becomes available.

Proved reserves are those estimated reserves of crude oil (including condensate and natural gas liquids) and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with investors (the “Investors”) thatreasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are those expected to be recovered through existing wells, equipment, and operating methods.

Estimated Quantities of Proved Reserves (Mbbl)

Estimated Quantities of Proved Reserves March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
       
Proved Developed, Producing  463   17 
Proved Developed, Non-Producing  -   - 
Total Proved Developed  463   17 
Proved Undeveloped  -   - 
Total Proved  463   17 

F-53

ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2021

Petroleum and Natural Gas Reserves

Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and natural gas and related substances, which by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known resources, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations prior to the holderstime at which contracts providing the right to operate expire.

Standardized Measure of warrants issuedDiscounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Reserves

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves and the changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves were prepared in accordance with provisions of ASC 932, “Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas.” Future cash inflows as March 31, 2021 and 2020 were computed by applying the unweighted, arithmetic average of the closing price on the first day of each month for the twelve month period prior to March 31, 2021 and 2020 to estimated future production. Future production and development costs are computed by estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved oil and natural gas reserves at year-end, based on year-end costs and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions.

Future income tax expenses are calculated by applying appropriate year-end tax rates to future pretax net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves, less the tax basis of properties involved. Future income tax expenses give effect to permanent differences, tax credits and loss carry forwards relating to the proved oil and natural gas reserves. Future net cash flows are discounted at a rate of ten percent annually to derive the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows. This calculation procedure does not necessarily result in an estimate of the fair market value of the Company’s oil and natural gas properties. 

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flow March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
       
Future gross revenue $17,839  $767 
Less: Future production tax expense  (1,181)  (35)
Future gross revenue after production taxes  16,658   732 
Less: Future operating costs  (5,058)  (565)
Less: Ad Valorem Taxes  (160)  - 
Less: Development costs  (870)  (295)
Future net income (loss) before taxes  10,570   (128)
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows  (3,347)  40 
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (PV10) $7,223  $(88)


ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLAR AMOUNTS AND SHARES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

MARCH 31, 2021

Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows

The changes in the standardized measure of future net cash flows relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves for the years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:

Change in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flow March 31,
2021
  March 31,
2020
 
       
Balance - beginning $(88) $- 
Net changes in prices and production costs  (3,960)  (412)
Net changes in future development costs  (392)  (203)
Sales of oil and gas produced, net  (1,480)  - 
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery  -   - 
Purchases of reserves  13,055   527 
Sales of reserves  -   - 
Revisions of previous quantity estimates  88   - 
Previously estimated development costs incurred  -   - 
Net change income taxes  -   - 
Accretion of discount  -   - 
Balance - ending $7,223  $(88)

In accordance with SEC requirements, the pricing used in the Company’s purchase agreements entered intostandardized measure of future net revenues in based on (i)the twelve month unweighted arithmetic average of the first day of the month price for the period April through March 14, 2018 (the “March Purchase Agreement”for each period presented and such warrants, the “March Warrants”)adjusted by lease for transportation fees and (ii) August 9, 2018 (the “August Purchase Agreement” and such warrants, the “August Warrants”, and the March Warrants and the August Warrants, collectively, the “Existing Securities”).regional price differentials. The Investors are entitled to, with respect to the March Warrants and the August Warrants, due to the Agreement and Planuse of Merger with Trend DiscoverySEC pricing rules may not be indicative of actual prices realized by the Company entered into on May 31, 2019, an exchange for the March Warrants and August Warrants. As a result of a cashless exercise, the Company issued 4,277 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Investors. Upon the issuance of the 4,277 shares, warrants for 5,677 shares issued in the March Purchase Agreement and August Purchase Agreement were extinguished.future.


Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

 

The Company changed its independent registered public accounting firm from KBL LLP to RBSM LLP effective with the third quarter interim review in fiscal 2019.None.

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, with the participation of our principal executiveChief Executive Officer and financial officers,Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to management (including the principal executive and financial officers) as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive and financial officers have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective given the identification of three material weaknesses in controls.effective. 

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We have advised our audit committee of three material weaknesses in internal control. The first weakness relates to inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives. In an effort to reduce expenses, the Company reduced its accounting and administrative staff at the parent company level to the extent that achieving desired control objectives were deemed at risk.

The second weakness relates to disclosure controls and violations of the Company’s delegation of authority and related policies that were established and approved by the board of directors. The Company continues to work with the board and board committees to communicate and reemphasize Company policies including the delegation of authority to reduce the risk of errors or omissions that could result in inaccurate or incomplete disclosures.

The third weakness relates to the failure to recognize derivative liabilities associated with warrants issued in conjunction with capital raises. The transactions were complex financings heavily dependent upon the use of estimates and assumptions and subjective interpretations of generally accepted accounting principles that are now the subject of a proposed Accounting Standards Update for which the FASB is requesting comments.


Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for our Company. InternalThe term “Internal control over financial reportingreporting” is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and financial officers and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of our Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, within the meaning of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard AS 2201, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our management, with the participation of our principal executiveChief Executive Officer and financial officersPrincipal Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2019.2021. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (“COSO”). Based on its assessment, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of March 31, 2019 based on those criteria.2021.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, except that we experienced the conversion of our principal accounting officer from employee to consultant and lost other members of our accounting staff. The Company has taken steps to mitigate the impact of these changes.reporting.

 

Item 9B. Other Information

 

Nothing to report.None.


PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  

     Director of the
Name Age Positions Held with the Company Company Since Age Position Director Since
Randy S. May 55 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 2016* 57 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 2016*
John P. Cahill 64 Director 2016   62 Director 2016  
Peter Mehring 57 President, CEO and President of Zest Labs, Inc. and Director 2017   59 President and Director; CEO and President of Zest Labs, Inc. 2017  
Gary Metzger 67 Lead Director 2016* 69 Lead Director 2016*
Steven K. Nelson 61 Director 2017   63 Director 2017  
Michael Green 64 Director 2017  

 

* Messrs. May and Metzger served on the board of directors of Ecoark, Inc. from 2011 and 2013, respectively, until it effected a reverse acquisition of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. (“Ecoark” or “the Company”, formerly known as Magnolia Solar Corporation) on March 24, 2016. Messrs. May and Metzger joined the Board effective on April 11, 2016.

*Messrs. May and Metzger served on the board of directors of Ecoark from 2011 to 2013, respectively, until it effected a reverse acquisition of Ecoark Holdings on March 24, 2016. Messrs. May and Metzger again joined the Board effective on April 11, 2016.

  

All directors shall serve until the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders and until successors are duly elected or until the earliest of their removal or resignation. There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers.

Randy S. May. Mr. May has served as Chairman of the Board of Ecoark Holdings, Inc. since MarchApril 11, 2016 and served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from MarchApril 13, 2016 through March 28, 2017, and then again from September 21, 2017, to the present. He previously served as chairmanChairman of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and as chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Ecoark, Inc. from its incorporation until its reverse acquisition with Magnolia Solar Corporation in March 2016. Mr. May is a 25-year retail and supply-chain veteran with extensive experience in marketing, operational and executive roles. Prior to Ecoark,joining the Company, Mr. May held a number of roles with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Walmart”), the world’s largest retailer based in Bentonville, Arkansas.. From 1998 to 2004, Mr. May served as Divisional Manager for half the United States for one of Walmart’s specialty divisions, where he was responsible for all aspects of strategic planning, finance, and operations for more than 1,800 stores. He had profit and loss responsibility for more than $4 billion of sales at the time. Under Mr. May’s leadership, the business grew sales and market share in a strong competitive market. Mr. May’s qualifications and background that qualify him to serve on the Board include his strong managerial and leadership experience, his extensive knowledge of strategic planning, finance and operations, as well his ability to guide the Company.

 

John P. Cahill. Mr. Cahill has served on the Board of Directors since May 2016. Mr. Cahill is currently Chief of Staff and Special Counsel to the Archbishop of New York. HeYork, which position he has held this position since April of 2019. Previously he was Senior Counsel at the law firm of Norton Rose Fulbright (formerly Chadbourne & Parke LLP) and hashad served in that capacity since 2007. He is also a principal at the Pataki-Cahill Group LLC, a strategic consulting firm focusing on the economic and policy implications of domestic energy needs, which he co-founded in March 2007. He served in various capacities in the administration of the Governor of New York, George E. Pataki from 1997 to 2006, including Secretary and Chief of Staff to the Governor from 2002 to 2006. He has also servesserved on the board of directors of Sterling Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).since August 2011. Mr. Cahill’s extensive experience as an attorney in government and in business, as well ashis legal experience and his extensive knowledge of and high-level experience in energy and economic policy, qualifies him as a member of the Board.

Peter A. Mehring. Mr. Mehring became a member of the Board in January 2017. He has also served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Ecoark’s subsidiary, Zest Labs, Inc., since 2009, and became a memberhe was appointed President of the Board of Directors in January 2017. He was elected President of EcoarkCompany on September 25, 2017. Mr. Mehring brings extensive experience in engineering, operations and general management at emerging companies and large enterprises. As Chief Executive Officer of Zest Labs, Inc., he has led the Company’s efforts in pioneering on-demand data visibility and condition monitoring solutions for the fresh produce market. Prior to joining Zest Labs, Inc., from 2004 to 2006, Mr. Mehring was the Vice President of Macintosh hardware group at Apple Computer, Senior Vice President of Engineering at Echelon, and founder, General Manager and Vice President of R&D at UMAX. Mr. Mehring held Engineering Management positions at Radius, Power Computing Corporation, Sun Microsystems and Wang Laboratories. Mr. Mehring’s knowledge and experience in engineering, operations, management, product and service development, and technological innovation are among the many qualifications that have led to the conclusion that Mr. Mehring is qualified to serve on the Board.

 


Gary M. Metzger. Mr. Metzger has servedbeen serving on the Board of Directors since March 24, 2016 and served on the Board of Directors of Ecoark, Inc. from 2013 until its reverse acquisitionmerger with Magnolia Solar Corporation in March 2016. Mr. Metzger offershas 40 years of product development, strategic planning, management, business development and operational expertise to the Board.expertise. He served as an executive at Amco International, Inc. and Amco Plastics Materials, Inc. (“Amco”), where in 1986 he was named President and served in such role for 24 years until Amco was sold to global resin distribution company, Ravago Americas, in December 2011, where he remains a product developer and product manager. Mr. Metzger was also a co-owner of Amco Plastics Materials, Inc. and Amco International. Mr. Metzger’s leadership and knowledge of manufacturing companies, product development, strategic planning, management and business development are an asset to the Board of Directors.Amco. In addition to his leadership functions, Mr. Metzger spearheaded research and development for recycled polymers, new alloy and bio-based polymer development, and introduced fragrance into polymer applications. He also developed encrypted item level bar code identification technology, anti-counterfeiting technologies, and antimicrobial technologies. The Company believes that Mr. Metzger’s leadership and knowledge of manufacturing companies, product development, strategic planning, management and business development are an asset to the Board. Taken together, these are among the many qualifications and the significant experience that have led to the conclusion that Mr. Metzger is qualified to serve on the Board.

 

Steven K. Nelson. Mr. Nelson has servedbeen serving on the Board of Directors since April 2017. Since 2015, Mr. Nelson has been a lecturer for the Department of Accounting at the University of Central Arkansas. InFrom 1988 to 2015 Mr. Nelson retiredserved as Vice-President, Controller of Dillard’s, Inc., where he was responsible for administering all aspects of financial accounting and reporting. Prior to that, in 1980 Mr. Nelson began his career in 1980served as a staff accountant for Ernst & Young and attained the title of audit manager by the time he left the firm in 1984. Mr. Nelson maintains an active licenseis licensed as a Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) in the State of Arkansas. Mr. Nelson’s 35-year career as a CPA and his extensive experience as controller of a publicly traded company qualify him to serve on the Board and its Audit Committee. His broad experience as the former controller of a public company uniquely qualifies Mr. Nelson to advise Ecoark not only on general accounting and financial matters but also on various technical accounting, corporate governance and risk management matters that the Board may address from time to time. He possesses key insight on financial reporting processes and external reporting issues. The Board has determined that Mr. Nelson qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

Michael Green. Mr. Green retired in June 2015 as the vice president for IBM’s Strategic Services North America and continued to serve as a consultant to IBM through April 2017. Mr. Green served in several leadership roles over his 35-year career at IBM, including serving as the general manager of IBM North America’s strategic outsourcing services; vice president of healthcare and insurance for IBM global services; and vice president of strategic services for Latin America, among other roles. Mr. Green’s extensive leadership experience at IBM, including his work with IBM’s blockchain technology, are among the many attributes that uniquely qualify Mr. Green to serve as a member of the Board.

 

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

Set forth below is biographical information with respect to each current executive officer of the Company. Mr. May and Mr. Mehring also serve as directors of the Company. Officers are elected by the board of directors to hold office until their successors are elected and qualified.

 

Name Age Positions Held with the CompanyPosition
Randy S. May 5557 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Peter Mehring 5759 President and Director; CEO and President of Zest Labs, Inc. and Director
William B. Hoagland 3739 PrincipalChief Financial Officer, Secretary
Jay Puchir45Treasurer; CEO and President of Banner Midstream Corp.

 

Jay Oliphant resigned as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer on May 15, 2019. Pursuant to a Separation Agreement with the Company (the “Separation Agreement”), Mr. Oliphant received his normal monthly salary through May 15, 2019. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Oliphant entered into a consulting agreement with the Company for a term of six months beginning May 16, 2019. Under the consulting agreement, Mr. Oliphant has agreed to assist the Company with financial reporting and related matters. William B. Hoagland was appointed as the Principal Financial Officer to succeed Mr. Oliphant. Mr. Hoagland has served as the Managing Member of Trend Discovery Capital Management, an investment fund, since 2011.

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers.


Executive Officers

Randy May. See “—Board of Directors” above for Mr. May’s biographical information.

 

Peter Mehring. See “—Board of Directors” above for Mr. Mehring’s biographical information.

 

William B. Hoagland. Mr. Hoagland is PrincipalChief Financial Officer of the Company. Immediately prior to joining Ecoark, Inc. in 2019, Mr. Hoagland spent the previous eight years as Managing Member of Trend Discovery Capital Management (“Trend Discovery”), a hybrid hedge fund since inception with a track record of outperforming the S&P 500. Prior to founding Trend Discovery in 2011, Mr. Hoagland spent six years as a Senior Associate at Prudential Global Investment Management (PGIM), working in both PGIM’s Newark, NJ and London, England offices. He has a Bachelor in Economics degree from Bucknell University. Mr. Hoagland holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a Level III candidate in the Chartered Market Technician Program.

 


SECTIONJay Puchir. Mr. Puchir has served as Treasurer of the Company since October 22, 2020. Mr. Puchir has also served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Banner Midstream Corp. since its formation in April 2018.  Mr. Puchir served in various roles as an executive at the Company including Director of Finance from December 2016 to March 2017, Chief Executive Officer from March 2017 to October 2017, Chief Financial Officer from October 2017 to May 2018, and Chief Accounting Officer from March 2020 to October 2020.  Mr. Puchir started his career as an auditor at PricewaterhouseCoopers and a consultant at Ernst & Young, ultimately achieving the position of Senior Manager at Ernst & Young. Mr. Puchir held the role of Associate Chief Financial Officer with HCA Healthcare from February 2016 to December 2016, and from February 2013 to February 2016 he served as the Director of Finance at The Citadel. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Banner Energy Services Corp. from November 2019 to August 2020 and as Chairman from February 2020 to August 2020. Mr. Puchir is a licensed Certified Public Accountant. 

SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES

NameAgePosition
Jimmy R. Galla54Chief Accounting Officer
Julia Olguin53Chief Executive Officer of White River Holdings Corp

Jimmy R. Galla. Mr. Galla has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since October 22, 2020. He had previously served as the Company’s Director of Financial Reporting since July 20, 2020, and prior to that he served as an accounting consultant to the Company from January 2017 to March 2020. From October 2017 to July 2020, Mr. Galla served as VP, Financial Accounting Lead Analyst, Deputy Controller Department of Citibank, Inc. Prior to that he worked at Walmart Stores, Inc., holding the position of Senior Manager, Finance Planning, Real Estate Finance from August 2010 to December 2016.

Julia Olguin. Ms. Olguin was appointed the Chief Executive Officer of White River, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company on February 12, 2021. She previously served as the Executive Vice President, Business Development, Trading & Marketing and Strategy, at Meridian Energy Group Inc., an oil and gas exploration and development company, from January 2014 until July 2020.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers, except that Mr. Metzger is Mr. Hoagland’s stepfather-in-law.

Director Independence

Our Board, in the exercise of its reasonable business judgment, has determined that each of the Company’s three non-employee directors qualifies as an independent director pursuant to Rule 5605(a)(2) of Nasdaq Listing Rules and applicable SEC rules and regulations.

Our Board has also determined that Messrs. John P. Cahill, Gary M. Metzger and Steven K. Nelson meet the independence requirements under Rule 5605(c)(2) of the listing rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC (the “Nasdaq Listing Rules”) and the heightened independence requirements for Audit Committee members under Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Our Board has also determined that Messrs. John P. Cahill, Gary M. Metzger and Steven K. Nelson meet the heightened independence requirements for Compensation Committee members under Rule 5605(d)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules and Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act.

In determining directors’ independence, the Board considered among other things, the transactions disclosed in Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company has a standing Audit Committee of the Board consisting of three members. The current members of our Audit Committee are Mr. Nelson, Chair, and Messrs. Cahill and Metzger. The Board has determined that Mr. Nelson qualifies as the “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Delinquent Section 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEReports

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of greaterpersons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to file initial reports of holdingsownership and transactionschanges in Ecoarkownership of our common stock and other equity securities with the SEC.

These individuals are required by the regulations of the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on itsa review of the copies of suchthe forms furnished to Ecoarkus, and written representations from certain reporting persons, Ecoark believeswe believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners were metcomplied with during our fiscal year ended March 31, 2019.2021, except one Form 3 for Jay Puchir in connection with his appointment as the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer and three Form 4’s for each of Steven Nelson, Gary Metzger and John Cahill reporting quarterly option grants to non-employee directors, not timely filed due in each case to an administrative error.

 

 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


Code of Ethics

 

We have adopted a Code of Ethics as defined in Item 406 of Regulation S-K, which code applies to all of our directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. All directors, officers, and other employees are expected to be familiar with the Code of Ethics and to adhere to the principles and procedures set forth therein. The Code of Ethics forms the foundation of a comprehensive program that requires compliance with all corporate policies and procedures and seeks to foster an open relationship among colleagues that contributes to good business conduct and an abiding belief in the integrity of our employees. Our policies and procedures cover all areas of professional conduct, including employment policies, conflicts of interest, intellectual property, and the protection of confidential information, as well as strict adherence to all laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business.

 

Directors, officers, and other employees are required to report any conduct that they believe in good faith to be an actual or apparent violation of the Code of Ethics. The full text of the Code of Ethics is available on our website athttps://www.zestlabs.com/downloads/Code-of-Ethics-2016.pdfwww.ecoarkusa.com/investor-relations. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or a waiver from, any provision of our Code of Ethics by posting such amendment or waiver on our website.

 

Audit Committee

The current members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Nelson, as chair, Cahill, Metzger and Green, each of whom is a non-employee member of our board of directors. Mr. Nelson is our audit committee chairman and financial expert, as that term is defined under the SEC rules implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and possesses financial sophistication, as defined under the rules of The Nasdaq Global Select Market.

The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the charter of the Audit Committee adopted by the Board. The Audit Committee generally assists the Board in its oversight of the relationship with our independent registered public accounting firm, financial statement and disclosure matters, the internal audit function, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee meets as often as it determines necessary, and at least four times each year.


Management has the primary responsibility for our financial statements and the reporting process, and our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Audit Committee also monitors our financial reporting process and internal control system, retains and pre-approves audit and any non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered accounting firm, directly consults with our independent registered public accounting firm, reviews and appraises the efforts of our independent registered public accounting firm, and provides an open avenue of communication among our independent registered public accounting firm, financial and senior management and the Board. The Audit Committee has the authority to retain independent legal, accounting, and other advisors.

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an independent director under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, related SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards related to audit committees, and that each satisfies all other applicable standards for service on the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that Mr. Nelson meets the requirements adopted by the SEC for qualification as an audit committee financial expert. The identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than those that are imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board in the absence of such identification. Moreover, the identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert for purposes of the regulations of the SEC does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or the Board. Finally, a person who is determined to be an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an “expert” for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.

The Audit Committee held nine meetings in fiscal 2019. The Audit Committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act and operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC A copy of the audit committee charter is available on our website athttps://www.zestlabs.com/downloads/Audit-Commitee.pdf.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table provides information regardingis related to the compensation of our named executive officers duringpaid, distributed or accrued by us for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2019, 20182021 and 2017.2020 to the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officers) serving during the last fiscal year and the two other most highly compensated executive officers serving at the end of the last fiscal year whose compensation exceeded $100,000.

 

Name and Principal Position Year  Salary(1)  Stock
Awards(2)
  Option
Awards(2)
  Total 
Randy S. May(3) 2019  $200,000  $-  $-  $200,000 
Chairman of the Board 2018  $100,000  $-  $-  $100,000 
and Chief Executive Officer                   
                    
Peter Mehring 2019  $200,000  $-  $-  $200,000 
President, Chief Executive Officer 2018  $276,677  $759,500  $2,414,948  $3,451,115 
and President of Zest Labs, Inc.                   
                    
Jay Oliphant 2019  $170,000  $-  $-  $170,000 
Former Principal Financial Officer 2018  $170,000  $152,459  $238,155  $560,614 
Name and Principal Position Fiscal
Year
 Salary(1)  Option
Awards (2)
  Total 
Randy S. May 2021 $333,333(3)  ˗  $333,333 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer 2020 $200,000  $165,137(4) $365,137 
               
Peter Mehring 2021 $200,000   -  $200,000 
President, Chief Executive Officer and President of Zest Labs, Inc. 2020 $200,000  $1,229,690(5) $1,449,690 
               
William B. Hoagland (6) 2021 $183,750   ˗  $183,750 
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary 2020  115,156(7)  -   115,156 

 

(1)We periodically review, and may increase, base salaries in accordance with the Company’s normal annual compensation review for each of our named executive officers.

(2)Stock and option awards are based onAmounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair valuesvalue of awards and are calculated utilizing the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” See NotesNote 1 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements of the Company contained in Item 8 of the Company’sthis Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2019 for further information regarding the assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards.

(3)Effective July 29, 2020, Mr. May’s annual base salary was increased from $200,000 to $400,000.

(4)Represents 50,000 stock options granted to Mr. May for services as an employee.

(5)Represents 200,000 stock options granted to Mr. Mehring for services as an employee.

(6)Mr. MayHoagland has served as Chief Executive Officer of Ecoarkthe principal financial officer since June 1, 2019.

(7)Effective September 18, 2020, Mr. Hoagland’s annual base salary was increased from March 2016 through March 28, 2017 and then from September 21, 2017$180,000 to the present.$270,000.

 


Employment, Severance, Separation and Change in Control Agreements

 

Executive Employment Arrangements

Peter Mehring

 

The terms ofEmployment Agreement with Mr. Mehring’s employment with Ecoark are set forth in an offer letter accepted onMehring effective August 15, 2013. Pursuant to the offer letter, Mr. Mehring received2013, as amended, provides that he will receive an annual base salary of $300,000 (subsequently adjusted and accepted)$200,000 and is eligible to participate in regular health insurance, bonus, and other employee benefit plans established by Ecoark.

The offer letter alsoEmployment Agreement includes standard confidentiality and non-complete obligations. The parties are permitted to terminate employment for any reason, at any time, with or without notice and without cause. The offer letterEmployment Agreement also contains severance benefit provisions in the event that Mr. Mehring’s employment is terminated without “Cause” (as defined in the offer letter)therein) or Mr. Mehring terminates his employment for “Good Reason” within 12 months following a “Change in Control” (as defined in the offer letter)therein). If Mr. MehringMehring’s employment is terminated without “Cause,” then he is entitled to receive an amount equal to six months base salary. If he terminates his employment for “Good Reason” within 12 months following a “Change in Control,” then Mr. Mehring is entitled to receive an amount equal to six months base salary and accelerated vesting of a portion of the non-vested options or shares. In order to receive severance benefits under the offer letter, Mr. Mehring is required to sign a release and waiver of all claims. Finally, Ecoark reserves the right to change or otherwise modify, in its sole discretion, the terms of the offer letter.

 

Potential Payments Upon Change of Control

We have no liabilities under termination or change in control conditions. We do not have a formal policy to determine executive severance benefits. Each executive severance arrangement is negotiated on an individual basis.

Option Grants and Outstanding Equity Awards at March 31, 2019

Effective October 13, 2017, the Compensation Committee issued new options awards (the “Replacement Options”) in replacement of existing restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards (the “Existing Awards”) previously granted to Peter Mehring and Jay Oliphant. In addition, the Committee approved new option awards to Messrs. Mehring and Oliphant that vest over a four-year period (the “New Options”) to induce them to accept the Replacement Options; to compensate them for diminution in value of their Existing Awards as compared to the Replacement Options; and in consideration of a number of other factors, including each individual’s role and responsibility with the Company, their years of service to the Company, and market precedents and standards for modification of equity awards.

The Replacement Options and New Options are designed to better align Messrs. Mehring and Oliphant’s potentially realizable equity compensation with Company performance. Because the incentive value of stock options is tied to future appreciation in stock price, the Committee believes stock option grants will better align our executive officers and employees’ interests with those of the Company and its stockholders and, as a result, the Compensation Committee intends to continue to utilize options to a greater extent in our equity compensation program on a going forward basis.

With respect to the Replacement Options, Messrs. Mehring and Oliphant have agreed to forfeit Existing Awards covering 1,345,000 and 132,640 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, and each was granted Replacement Options to purchase an equal number of shares of Company common stock. The exercise price for the Replacement Options was set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grants (October 13, 2017). In consideration of Messrs. Mehring and Oliphant’s agreements to forfeit their Existing Awards, the Committee, after careful deliberation, determined that (i) 100% of Mr. Mehring’s Replacement Options would vest immediately upon grant, and (ii) 50% of Mr. Oliphant’s Replacement Options would vest immediately upon grant. The remaining portion of Mr. Oliphant’s Replacement Options will vest in 12 equal installments, with the first installment vesting on January 15, 2018, and additional installments vesting on the last day of each of the eleven successive three-month periods, subject to Mr. Oliphant’s continued employment by the Company. The Replacement Options were issued under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan or 2013 Incentive Stock Plan to correspond with the plan under which the Existing Awards were issued.


With respect to the New Options, Messrs. Mehring and Oliphant were granted options to purchase 2,017,500 and 66,320 shares of Company common stock, respectively, that vest at a rate of 25% per year on October 13th of each year from 2018 to 2021 subject to Messrs. Mehring and Oliphant’s continued employment by the Company. As with the Replacement Options, the New Options have an exercise price set at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s stock price on the effective date of the grant. The New Options were not granted under any of the Company’s existing equity compensation plans.

 

The following table presents information concerning equity awards held by our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers as of March 31, 2019.2021:

 

 

Number of

Securities

 

Number of

Securities

 Option Awards Number of
Securities
Underlying
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
  Option Awards
Name Vesting
Commencement
Date
 Underlying
Options (#)
Exercisable
 Underlying
Options (#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price ($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price ($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
Randy S. May  50,000   --   4.55  12/31/2029
Peter Mehring 10/13/2017 1,345,000(1)  2.60 10/23/2027  571,625   100,875(1)  13.00  10/23/2027
 10/13/2018  2,017,500(2) 2.60 10/23/2027  100,000   100,000(2)  2.50  10/3/2029
Jay Oliphant 10/13/2017 71,796(3) 60,844(3) 2.60 10/23/2027
 10/13/2018  66,320(4) 2.60 10/23/2027
William B. Hoagland  --   --   --  --

(1)Remainder vests on October 13, 2021.

 

(1)This option was fully vested(2)Remainder vests in two equal annual installments on October 13, 2017.
(2)This option vests at a rate of 25% per year on3, 2021 and October 13th of each year from 2018 to 2021.
(3)50% of this option vested immediately upon grant. The remaining portion vests in 12 equal installments, with the first installment vesting on January 15, 2018, and additional installments vesting on the last day of each of the eleven successive three-month periods.
(4)This option vests at a rate of 25% per year on October 13th of each year from 2018 to 2021.
(5)The options in (3) and (4) above were replaced by options exercisable for 198,960 shares immediately vested and exercisable through December 31, 2020.3, 2022.

 

2018 DirectorDirectors’ Compensation Table

 

Directors may receive compensation for their services and reimbursement for their expenses as shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board. Beginning with the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018, directors will receiveeach non-employee director receives each quarter a stock option award with a Black-Scholes value of $25,000. Options willAdditional options may be granted withfor placement and attendance at committee meetings. These stock options are fully vested as of the grant date and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Ecoark’sthe Company’s common stock.stock on the last day of the fiscal quarter.

 


The following table sets forth the compensation paid toearned by our non-employee directors for service during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019:2021. See “Summary Compensation Table” for the discussion of compensation paid to, or accrued for, Messrs. May and Mehring.

Name 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash

($)

  

Stock Awards

($)

  

Total

($)

 
John P. Cahill  16,000   100,000   100,000 
Gary Metzger  19,000   100,000   100,000 
Steven K. Nelson  17,000   100,000   100,000 
Michael Green  14,000   100,000   100,000 

Name 

Option

Awards

($)(1)

  

Total

($)

 
John P. Cahill  100,000   100,000 
Gary Metzger  100,000   100,000 
Steven K. Nelson  100,000   100,000 

 

See additional information on compensation above in Summary Compensation Table for directors Randy May and Peter Mehring.

(1)Amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of the Company contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding the assumptions underlying the valuation of equity awards.

(2)The table below sets forth the shares of unexercised options held by each of our non-employee directors outstanding as of March 31, 2021, adjusted to give effect to the one-for-five reverse stock split effective December 17, 2020:

NameAggregate Number of Option Awards Outstanding at
March 31,
2021
John P. Cahill95,967
Gary Metzger105,018
Steven K. Nelson105,018

 


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our Compensation Committee consists of four directors, each of whom is a non-employee director: Messrs. Green, as chair, Cahill, Metzger and Nelson. None of the aforementioned individuals was an officer or employee of ours, was formerly an officer of ours or had any relationship requiring disclosure by us under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No interlocking relationship as described in Item 407(e)(4) of Regulation S-K exists between any of our executive officers or Compensation Committee members, on the one hand, and the executive officers or compensation committee members of any other entity, on the other hand, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

2013 Incentive Stock Plan

The 2013 Incentive Stock Plan of Ecoark Holdings (previously Magnolia Solar Corporation) (the “2013 Incentive Stock Plan”) was registered on February 7, 2013. Under the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan, the Company may grant incentive stock in the form of Stock Options, Stock Awards and Stock Purchase Offers of up to 5,500,000 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant.

2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan

The 2017 Ecoark Holdings Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan”) was registered on June 14, 2017. Under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the Company may grant nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, and other awards. Awards of up to 4,000,000 shares of common stock to Company employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are available under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The type of grant, vesting provisions, exercise price and expiration dates are to be established by the Board at the date of grant.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table contains information about the 2013 Incentive Stock Plan and the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan as of March 31, 2019:2021: 

 

  

Plan category

 

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options, warrants
and rights

  

Weighted-
average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

  

Number of securities 

available for future issuance under equity compensation 

plans (excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:         
2013 Incentive Stock Plan  2,353,000  $2.52   454,000 
2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan  1,870,000  $1.54   1,615,000 
Equity compensation not approved by stockholders  2,916,000(1) $2.60   - 
Total  7,139,000  $2.30   2,069,000 

 

Plan category Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
  Weighted-
average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
  Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:         
2013 Incentive Stock Plan  346,497  $13.00   214,708 
2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan  444,891   8.24   222,254 
Equity compensation not approved by stockholders  1,649,625   6.84   - 
Total  2,441,013  $7.96   436,962 

(1)Represents non-qualified stock options not granted under any existing equity compensation plans.

 


57

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND

MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSSecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management

 

The following table provides informationsets forth the number of shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned as of August 5, 2019, concerning beneficial ownership of our capital stock heldJune 15, 2021 by (1) each of our directors, (2) each of our named executive officers, (3) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group, and (4) each group, person or entity(i) those persons known by usthe Company to beneficially ownbe owners of more than 5% of any classthe Company’s outstanding common stock, (ii) each director, (iii) each Named Executive Officer (as such term is defined in Item 402(m)(2) of our voting securities. Beneficial ownership is determinedRegulation S-K under the rules ofExchange Act), and (iv) the SECCompany’s current executive officers and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Percentages are calculated based on 62,348,301 shares of our common stock outstandingdirectors as of August 8, 2019.

The amounts and percentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of the security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of August 5, 2019. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which that person has no economic interest.

Except asgroup. Unless otherwise noted, the persons and entities listedspecified in the tablenotes to the below have sole voting and investing power with respect to all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable. Except as otherwise set forth below,table, the address of the beneficial owner isfor each person is: c/o Ecoark Holdings, Inc., 5899 Preston Road #505, Frisco, Texas, 75034.

Security Ownership of 5% or Greater Beneficial Owners

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

  Percent 
Nepsis Capital Management, Inc. (4)  13,976,688   22.4%
Sabby Management, LLC (5)  4,558,340   7.3%
Strategic Planning Group, Inc. (6)  4,523,919   7.3%

Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

 

Amount and

Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

  Percent 
Randy S. May  3,050,000   4.9%
John P. Cahill (1)  179,566   0.3%
Peter Mehring (2)  1,441,254   2.3%
Gary Metzger (3)  3,966,002   6.4%
Steven K. Nelson (3)  163,031   0.3%
Michael Green (3)  149,932   0.2%
William B. Hoagland  2,750,000   4.4%
Directors & Executive Officers as a Group (7 persons)  11,699,785   18.8%


303 Pearl Parkway Suite 200, San Antonio, TX 78215, Attention: Corporate Secretary.Notes:

 

Title of Class Beneficial Owner Amount of
Beneficial
Ownership  (1)
  Percent
Beneficially
Owned (1)
 
Named Executive Officers and Directors:      
Common Stock, Randy S. May (2)  646,000   2.82 %
Common Stock John P. Cahill (3)  96,886    
Common Stock Peter Mehring (4)  590,877   2.53 %
Common Stock Gary Metzger (5)  872,763   3.81 %
Common Stock Steven K. Nelson (6)  112,168    
Common Stock William B. Hoagland (7)  550,000   2.41 %
Common Stock All directors and all executive officers as a group (7 persons) (8)  2,868,694   12.10 %
5% Stockholders:          
Common Stock Nepsis, Inc. (9)  2,647,871   11.60%

*Less than 1%.

(1)

Applicable percentages are based on 22,820,573 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 15, 2021. Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within 60 days whether upon the exercise of options, warrants or conversion of convertible notes. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, the Company believes that each of the stockholders named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by them. This table does not include any unvested stock options except for those vesting within 60 days.

(2)Mr. May is our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Includes 4,59150,000 vested stock options.
(3)Mr. Cahill is a director. Includes 919 shares held by the Pataki-Cahill Group, LLC and options to purchase 127,281 shares.
(2)Includes options to purchase 1,345,000 shares.
(3)Includes options to purchase 127,281 shares.95,967 vested stock options.
(4)Mr. Mehring is our President and Chief Executive Officer and President of Zest Labs, Inc. Includes 571,625 vested stock options.
(5)Mr. Metzger is a director. Includes 200,000 shares held by Gary Metzger Irrevocable Trust and 105,018 vested stock options.
(6)Mr. Nelson is a director. Includes 105,018 vested stock options.
(7)Mr. Hoagland is our Chief Financial Officer.
(8)This amount represents beneficial ownership by all directors and all current executive officers of the Company including those who are not Named Executive Officers under the SEC’s disclosure rules. Includes 877,628 vested stock options.
(9)The address to this shareholder is 86928674 Eagle Creek Circle, Minneapolis, MN 55378. Based solely uponon the information contained in a Schedule 13D13D/A filed on January 24, 2019.20, 2021. According to that Schedule 13D,13D/A, Nepsis, Capital Management, Inc. disclaims all dispositive power and voting power over all reported shares.
(5)The address to this shareholder is 10 Mountainview Road Suite 205, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458. Based solely upon the information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on July 22, 2019. According to that Schedule 13G, Sabby Management, LLC has shared dispositive and voting power over all reported shares.
(6)The address to this shareholder is 57 River Street Suite 306, Wellesley, MA 02481. Based solely upon the information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on January 24, 2019. According to that Schedule 13G, Strategic Planning Group, Inc. has the sole dispositive power, but no voting power over all reported shares.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Existing Equity Compensation Plans58

  

On October 11, 2018, the Company filed a Form S-8 amending the Company’s 2017 Equity incentive plan, described in detail in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Meeting filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2017. The amendment authorized an additional 5,000,000 shares to be added to the 2017 Equity incentive plan pool.

The Company does not have any individual compensation arrangements with respect to its common or preferred stock. The issuance of any of our common or preferred stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, which has the power to issue any or all of our authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

The BoardSet forth below is the description of Directors has adopted a written policy regarding the review and approval of any related party transaction required to be disclosed under SEC rules. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the review and approval of transactions covered by the policy. As provided in the policy, in reviewing the proposed transaction, the Audit Committee will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including without limitation the commercial reasonableness of the terms, the benefit and perceived benefit, or lack thereof, to the Company, opportunity costs of alternate transactions, the materiality and character of the related party’s direct or indirect interest, and the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the related party.


The Audit Committee will not approve or ratify a related party transaction unless it will have determined that, upon consideration of all relevant information, the proposed transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Except as noted below, there were no commercial transactions between related parties and the Company that required disclosure in this Proxy Statement.

There were no transactions occurring since April 1, 2018, or that are currently proposed, (i)2019, to which the Company has been a party, in which the Company was or is to be a participant, (ii) where the amount involved exceedsexceeded $120,000, and (iii) in which the Company’sany of our directors, executive officers, directors, principal stockholdersbeneficial owners of 5% or more of our Common Stock and certain other related partiespersons had a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation arrangements described in this Form 10-K under “Executive Compensation” or “Director Compensation.” Unless otherwise indicated, share amounts and stock prices have been adjusted to give effect to the 1-for-5 reverse stock split effective December 17, 2020.

On May 31, 2019 the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Trend Discovery Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Trend Holdings”) pursuant to which the Company acquired 100% of Trend Holdings in a merger with the Company as the surviving entity. Pursuant to the merger, the 1,000 issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Trend Holdings were converted into 1,100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an approximate dollar value of $16,775,000 based on the closing price per share of Common Stock of $15.25 on the closing date of the merger. William B. Hoagland, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, was President and a principal stockholder of Trend Holdings and received 550,000 shares of Common Stock, having a total value of $8,387,500, pursuant to the merger.

Jay Puchir, the Company’s Treasurer, served as a consultant to the Company from May 2019 to March 2020 and was paid solely in stock options totaling 40,000 stock options at an exercise price of $3.15 per share. In addition, any outstanding notes with Mr. Puchir have been repaid as of March 31, 2021 along with all accrued interest.

 

Other TransactionsGary Metzger, a director, advanced approximately $328,000 to the Company through March 31, 2021, under the terms of a note payable that bears 10% simple interest per annum, and the principal balance along with accrued interest was payable July 30, 2020 or upon demand. Interest expense on the notes through March 31, 2021 was approximately $59,000 and the Company repaid $51,000 in interest leaving $8,000 in accrued interest at March 31, 2021. In addition, the Company assumed approximately $250,000 in notes entered into in March 2020 which remains outstanding at March 31, 2021. The Company incurred $37,000 in interest expense and repaid $28,000 in interest leaving $9,000 in accrued interest at March 31, 2021 via the acquisition of Banner Midstream Corp. (“Banner Midstream”) from Mr. Metzger at 15% interest. Mr. Metzger has waived any default provisions in the note and will accept a repayment of all outstanding principal and interest when the Company elects to make payment.

 

We have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers that, among other things, provide for certain severance and changeOn March 27, 2020, the Company issued 1,789,041 shares of control benefits. For a description of these agreements, see “Executive Compensation—Executive Employment Arrangements.”

We have granted stock options to our executive officers. Pursuant to our outside director compensation policy, we have paid cash compensation and granted restricted stock units to our non-employee directors. For a description of these arrangements, see “Executive Compensation.”

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

While ourits common stock is not listedto Banner Energy Services, Inc. (“Banner Energy”) and assumed approximately $11,774,000 in debt and lease liabilities of Banner Midstream. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and another director, John Cahill, recused themselves from all board discussions on a national securities exchange that requires our independent board members, a majoritythe acquisition of our directors and each memberBanner Midstream as they were stockholders and/or noteholders of our audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees are independent. A director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

After reviewingBanner Midstream. The transaction was approved by all relevant relationships, the Board of Directors concluded that Cahill, Green, Metzger, and Nelson are independent under the SEC rules adopted pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and in accordance with NYSE Corporate Governance Rules. No director or executive officerdisinterested members of the CompanyBoard. The Chairman and CEO of Banner Energy is related to any other director or executive officer of the Company by blood, marriage or adoption. In making its independence determination, the Board considered all relevant transactions, relationships, or arrangements, including those disclosed under the section titled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Board Leadership Structure. The Board of Directors has no fixed policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board retains the discretion to determine, at any time, whether to combine or separate the positions as it deems to be in the best interestsTreasurer of the Company and its stockholders. The roles of the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are currently performed by one individual.and President of Banner Midstream. Included in the shares issued in this transaction, John Cahill received 164,384 shares of common stock and Jay Puchir received 547,945 shares of common stock. At the time of this transaction, Mr. Cahill and his brother were also members of Shamrock Upstream Energy LLC, a subsidiary of Banner Midstream.

 

Our bylaws provide thatIn the Banner Midstream acquisition, Randy S. May, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, was the holder of approximately $1,242,000 in notes payable by Banner Midstream and its subsidiaries, which were assumed by the Company in the transaction. Additionally, Mr. May held a note payable by Banner Energy in the amount of $2,000,000 in principal and accrued interest, which was converted into 2,739,726 shares of Common Stock (on a pre-reverse stock split basis) as a result of the Board may be elected by a majority votetransaction. Neither of the Board of Directors and shall serve until the meeting of the Board following the next annual meeting of stockholders at which such Chairman is re-elected. The Chairman of the Board shall preside at all meetings. Otherwise, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) provide that a lead director selected by the non-management directors (the “Lead Director”) shall preside at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman of the Board is not present. The Guidelines require that the Lead Director shall preside at executive sessions of the non-management directors. The non-management directors will meet in executive session, no less frequently than quarterly, as determined by the Lead Director, or when a director makes a request of the Lead Director. Gary Metzger currently serves as the Lead Director.

The Board believes that maintaining a healthy mix of qualified independent and management directors on the Board is an integral part of effective corporate governance and management of the Company. The Board also believes that the current leadership structure strikes an appropriate balance between independent directors and directors, which allows the Board to effectively represent the best interests of the Company’s entire stockholder base.these amounts remain outstanding.

 


Role of the Board in Risk Oversight. The Board of Directors believes that risk management is an important part of establishing, updating and executing on our business strategy. The Board has oversight responsibility relating to risks that could affect the corporate strategy, business objectives, compliance, operations, and the financial condition and performance of the Company, and focuses its oversight on the most significant risks facing us and, on our processes, to identify, prioritize, assess, manage and mitigate those risks. The Board receives regular reports from members of the Company’s senior management on areas of material risk to us, including strategic, operational, financial, legal and regulatory risks. While the Board has an oversight role, management is principally tasked with direct responsibility for management and assessment of risks and the implementation of processes and controls to mitigate their effects on us.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (“Nominating Committee”). The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating Committee are set forth in the charter of the Nominating Committee adopted by the Board. The Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to serve on the Board and recommending individuals to be nominated by the Board for election by stockholders or appointed by the Board to fill vacancies. Among its duties and responsibilities, the Nominating Committee is responsible for shaping corporate governance, reviewing and assessing the Guidelines, recommending Board compensation, and overseeing the annual evaluation of the Board. The Nominating Committee has the authority to retain compensation or other consultants as well as search firms for director candidates. In accordance with its charter, the Nominating Committee meets as often as it determines necessary, but at least four times each year.

The Nominating Committee currently consists of Messrs. Cahill, as chair, Metzger, Nelson and Green. The process followed by the Nominating Committee to identify and evaluate candidates includes (i) requesting recommendations from the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, and other parties, (ii) meeting to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates and their qualifications, and (iii) interviewing selected candidates. The Nominating Committee also considers recommendations for nomination to the Board submitted by stockholders. A stockholder who desires to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board should notify the Secretary of the Company or any member of the Nominating Committee in writing with supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate. The Nominating Committee has the authority and ability to retain compensation or other consultants and search firms to identify or evaluate director candidates.

In evaluating the suitability of candidates to serve on the Board, including stockholder nominees, the Nominating Committee seeks candidates who are independent, as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, related SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, and who meet certain selection criteria established by the Nominating Committee. The selection criteria include many factors, including a candidate’s general understanding of elements relevant to the success of a publicly traded company in the current business environment, understanding of our business, and educational and professional background. The Nominating Committee also considers a candidate’s judgment, competence, anticipated participation in Board activities, experience, geographic location and special talents or personal attributes. The guidelines provide that the composition of the Board should encompass a broad range of skills, expertise, industry knowledge, diversity, and contacts relevant to our business. Moreover, with respect to incumbent directors, the Nominating Committee also considers past performance, including attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board, and the director’s ability to make contributions after any significant change in circumstances (including changes in employment or professional status).

Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees paid by us to KBL LLPRBSM for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended March 31, 20192021 and 2018.2020.

 

 KBL, LLP 
 2019 2018  2021  2020 
Audit fees(1) $30,000 $173,966  $202,500  $120,000 
Audit-related fees - -   -   - 
Tax Fees - -   -   - 
All other fees(2)  57,000  10,250 
All other fees  -   - 
Total $87,000 $184,216  $202,500  $120,000 

(1)Audit fees consist of fees incurred in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of the interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports filed with the SEC.

(2)

Fees related to issuance of comfort letter to investment bankers in relation to issuance of capital stock and consent for report on fiscal year 2018 financial statements to be included in fiscal 2019 Form 10-K. 

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees paid by us to RBSM LLP for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2019.

Audit fees(1) $55,000 
Audit-related fees  - 
Tax Fees  - 
All other fees(2)  - 
Total $55,000 

The Audit Committee selects the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and separately pre-approves all audit services to be provided by it to the Company. The Audit Committee also reviews and separately pre-approves all audit-related, tax and all other services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the Audit Committee’s charter and policy on pre-approval of audit-related, tax and other services. In its review of these services and related fees and terms, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, the possible effect of the performance of such services on the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. None of the services described above were approved pursuant to the de minimis exception provided in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC.

The Audit Committee appointed RBSM, LLP (“RBSM”) to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019.

 

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee must review and approve, in advance, the scope and plans for the audits and the audit fees and approve in advance (or, where permitted under the rules and regulations of the SEC, subsequently) all non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditor that are not otherwise prohibited by law and any associated fees. The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more members of the committee the authority to pre-approve audit and permissible non-audit services, as long as this pre-approval is presented to the full committee at scheduled meetings. In accordance with the foregoing, the committee has delegated to the chair of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and associated fees, provided that the chair is required to report any decision to pre-approve such audit-related or non-audit services and fees to the full audit committee for ratification at its next regular meeting.


PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

 

Exhibit No. (a)Description of ExhibitFinancial Statements

(2)Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Magnolia Solar Corporation and Ecoark Inc. dated as of January 29, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the SEC as of February 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
(3)

(i) Articles of Incorporation; and (ii) Bylaws

3.1Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on June 13, 2008 (File No. 333-151633).
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 7, 2010 (File No. 000-53361).
3.3Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Magnolia Solar Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 24, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
3.4Certificate of Amendment to the Bylaws of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 14, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
3.5Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 28, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
(4)

Instruments defining the rights of securities holders

4.1Magnolia Solar Corporation 2013 Incentive Stock Plan, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC as of February 7, 2013 (File No. 333-186505)
(10)

Material Contracts

10.1Form of Modification Agreement between Magnolia Solar Corporation and holders of Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Convertible Notes and Warrants, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of February 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.2Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 6, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.3Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC as of April 29, 2016 (File No. 333-211045).
10.4Form of Subscription Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC as of May 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.5Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC as of May 4, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.6Share Exchange Agreement by and between Pioneer Products, LLC, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC and Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated as of May 3, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 9, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.7Master License Agreement by and between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and Magnolia Optical Technologies, Inc., dated as of April 30, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Amended Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the SEC as of June 17, 2016 (File No. 333-211045).
10.8Share Exchange Agreement by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc., Eco3D, LLC and Ken Smerz and Ted Mort, dated as of September 22, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of September 28, 2016 (File No. 000-53361).
10.9Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 13, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.10Purchase Agreement by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and Reddiamond Partners LLC, dated as of January 13, 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 13, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2021 and 2020

10.11Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 6, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.12Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 14, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC asSubsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations for Fiscal Years Ended March 14, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).31, 2021 and 2020

10.13Form of Warrant Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated March 14, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasersSubsidiaries Consolidated Statement of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 14, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.14Form of Warrant Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., datedChanges in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for March 31, 2017, by2021 and between 2020

Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various holdersSubsidiaries Consolidated Statements of convertible debt, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 3, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.15Form of Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 10, 2017 byCash Flows for Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2021 and among Eco3d Acquisition LLC, the Company, and Eco3d LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of April 14, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).2020

 

10.16Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 22, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers named therein,Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(b)Exhibits

Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference   

Filed or

Furnished

No. Exhibit Description Form Date Number Herewith
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger between the Company and Trend Holdings, dated May 31, 2019 8-K 6/6/19 2.1  
2.2 Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated March 27, 2020, by and between the Company and Banner Energy Services Corp. 8-K 4/2/20 10.1  
2.3 Asset Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, White River E&P LLC, Rabb Resources, Ltd. and Claude Rabb, dated August 14, 2020* 8-K 8/20/20 2.1  
3.1 Articles of Incorporation, as amended 10-Q 2/12/21 3.1  
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws 8-K 4/28/17 3.1  
10.1 Magnolia Solar Corporation 2013 Incentive Stock Plan+ S-8 2/7/13 4.1  
10.2 Offer Letter, dated August 12, 2013, by and between Intelleflex Corporation and Peter Mehring+       

Filed

10.3 Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective June 13, 2017+ S-8 6/14/17 99.1  
10.4 Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan+ 8-K 6/20/17 10.2  
10.5 Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan+ 8-K 6/20/17 10.3  
10.6 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan+ 8-K 6/20/17 10.4  
10.7 Form of Letter Agreement, dated January 26, 2020, by and between the Company and various purchasers named therein 8-K 1/30/20 10.1  
10.8 Form of Replacement Warrant, dated January 27, 2020 8-K 1/30/20 10.2  
10.9 Employment Agreement, dated March 27, 2020, by and between Banner Midstream Corp and Jay Puchir+       

Filed

10.10 Form of Letter Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2020, by and between the Company and various purchasers named therein 8-K 5/11/20 10.1  
10.11 Form of Replacement Warrant 8-K 5/11/20 10.2  
10.12 Agreement and Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease dated September 3, 2020 10-Q  2/12/21  10.1  
10.13 Agreement and Assignment of Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease, dated October 9, 2020 10-Q 2/12/21 10.2  
10.14 Participation Agreement dated October 9, 2020, by and between the Company, BlackBrush Oil & Gas, LP and White River SPV 3 LLC* 10-Q 2/12/21 10.3  
10.15 Engagement Agreement, dated December 23, 2020, by and between the Company and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC 8-K 12/30/20 10.2  
10.16 Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 29, 2020, by and between the Company and the Purchaser* 8-K 12/30/20 10.1  
10.17 Form of Warrant, dated December 31, 2020 8-K 12/30/20 4.1  
10.18 Form of Placement Agent Warrant, dated December 31, 2020 8-K 12/30/20 4.2  
10.19 Consulting Agreement between the Company, Centrecourt Asset Management LLC and Richard Smithline dated March 2, 2021 8-K 3/8/21 10.1  

14.1 Code of Ethics 8-K 2/3/21 14.1  
21.1 List of Subsidiaries S-1/A 7/23/21 21.1  
23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm       Filed
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002       Filed
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002       Filed
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002       Furnished**
32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002       Furnished**
101.INS XBRL Instance Document       Filed
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document       Filed
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document       Filed
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document       Filed
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document       Filed
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document       Filed

+Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

*Exhibits and/or Schedules have been omitted. The Company hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC upon request any omitted information.

**This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filedinto any filing, in accordance with the SEC asItem 601 of May 23, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.17Form of Warrant Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated May 22, 2017, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 23, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.18Exchange Agreement, entered into on May 18, 2017 by and among the Company, Zest Labs, Inc., 440labs, Inc., SphereIt, LLC and certain other parties, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 24, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.19Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective June 13, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 dated and filed with the SEC on June 14, 2017 (File No. 333-218748).
10.20Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of June 20, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.21Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of June 20, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.22Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of June 20, 2017 (File No. 000-53361).
10.23Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 14, 2018, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 20, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
10.24Form of Warrant Agreement of Ecoark Holdings, Inc., dated March 14, 2018, by and between Ecoark Holdings, Inc. and various purchasers of common stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 20, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
10.25Separation Agreement between the Company and Jay Puchir, dated May 11, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of May 17, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
10.26Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2018, by and among Virterras Materials US LLC, Sable Polymer Solutions, LLC, Pioneer Products, LLC, Ecoark, Inc., and Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of August 13, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
10.27Form of Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 28, 2018, by and between Trend Discovery SPV I, LLC and Ecoark Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of January 4, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
(16)Letter re change in certifying accountant
16.1Letter from KBL, LLP dated November 19, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of November 19, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
(21)Subsidiaries of the Registrant
21.1List of Subsidiaries
(23)Consents of Experts and Counsel
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(31)Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(32)Section 1350 Certification
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(99)Additional Exhibits
99.1Press Release dated August 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC as of August 1, 2018 (File No. 000-53361).
99.2Press Release dated March 13, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC as of March 15, 2019 (File No. 000-53361).
(101)Interactive Data Files
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentRegulation S-K.

Copies of this report (including the financial statements) and any of the exhibits referred to above will be furnished at no cost to our shareholders who make a written request to our Corporate Secretary at Ecoark Holdings, Inc., 303 Pearl Parkway Suite #200, San Antonio, Texas 78215.

 

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

 

Not applicable.None.


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

  

 Ecoark Holdings, Inc.ECOARK HOLDINGS, INC.
 (Registrant)
   
Date: August 19, 2019By:/s/ RANDY MAYRandy S. May
  Randy S. May
  Chief Executive Officer

SIGNATURETITLEDATE
 
/s/ Randy S. MayChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerJune 30, 2021
Randy S. May (Principal Executive Officer)
   
Date: August 19, 2019By:/s/ WILLIAMWilliam B. HOAGLANDHoagland
 Chief Financial OfficerJune 30, 2021
William B. Hoagland
(Principal Financial Officer)  Principal Financial Officer
   
Date: August 19, 2019By:/s/ STEVEN K. NELSONJim GallaChief Accounting OfficerJune 30, 2021
Jim Galla(Principal Accounting Officer)  Steven K. Nelson
Director
   
Date: August 19, 2019By:/s/ PETER MEHRINGSteven K. NelsonDirectorJune 30, 2021
Steven K. Nelson  Peter Mehring
  Director
   
Date: August 19, 2019By:/s/ GARY METZGERPeter MehringDirectorJune 30, 2021
Peter Mehring  Gary Metzger
  Director
   
Date: August 19, 2019By:/s/ MICHAEL GREENGary MetzgerDirectorJune 30, 2021
Gary Metzger  Michael Green
  Director
   
Date: August 19, 2019By:/s/ JOHN CAHILLJohn CahillDirectorJune 30, 2021
John Cahill  John Cahill
  Director

 

 

4063