Table of Content

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended DecemberJanuary 31, 2019

2023

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to

________

Commission File Numberfile number 001-39004

Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
(Exact Namename of Registrantregistrant as Specifiedspecified in its Charter)charter)

Delaware84-1747686

Delaware

84-1747686
(State or Other Jurisdictionother jurisdiction of

Incorporation

incorporation or Organization)

organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1010

Dallas, Texas

240 East Hacienda Avenue
Campbell, CA
7522595008
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant’s

(408) 841-4500
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (214) 368-0821

code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Units, each consisting of one share of Class A common stock and one-third of one warrantCommon Stock, par value $0.0001CHPTSBE.UThe New York Stock Exchange
Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per shareSBEThe New York Stock Exchange
Warrants, each whole warrant exercisable for one share of Class A common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per shareSBE WSThe New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Sectionsection 12(g) of the Act:

None

Act:

Common Shares
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),; and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

(Check one):
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filerSmaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No

As

The aggregate market value of June 30, 2019,voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on July 29, 2022, the last business day of the registrant’sRegistrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the registrant’s Class Aclosing price of $15.11 for shares of the Registrant’s common stock was not listed on any exchange or over-the counter market. The registrant’s units, each consisting of one share of Class A common stock and one-third of one warrant, began trading onas reported by the New York Stock Exchange, on July 26, 2019. Commencing September 16, 2019, holderswas approximately $4.1 billion. Shares of the units were permitted to elect to separately trade the shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by each executive officer, director, and warrants includedtheir affiliated holders have been excluded in the units. On December 31, 2019, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed fourth fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $307.8 million based on the closing sales price of the registrant’s common stock onthat such date as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant of which the registrant is aware arepersons may be deemed to be affiliates. SuchThis determination shouldof affiliate status is not be deemed to be an admission that such officers, directors or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliatesnecessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
The registrant had outstanding 350,493,445 shares of common stock as of March 28, 2023.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant.

AsRegistrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to its 2023 annual meeting of March 27, 2020, 31,411,763 sharesshareholders (the “2023 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 7,852,941 sharesthis Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated. The 2023 Proxy Statement will be filed with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None.

the fiscal year to which this report relates.


Table of Contents

Page
PART IPage
Item 1.1
Risk Factors18
Unresolved Staff Comments44
44
Legal Proceedings44
Mine Safety Disclosures44
Market for Registrant’sRegistrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities45
46
Management’s Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations46
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk51
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data51
Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosures52
Controls and Procedures52
Other Information52
PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance53
Executive Compensation61
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters62
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence64
Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services66
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules67

CERTAIN TERMS

References to the “Company,” “our,” “us” or “we” refer to Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation, a blank check company incorporated on May 10, 2019 as a Delaware corporation and formed for the purpose

2

Table of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses, which we refer to throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K as our “initial business combination.” References to our “Sponsor” refer to NGP Switchback, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. References to “NGP” are to NGP Energy Capital Management, L.L.C., an SEC-registered investment advisor that manages the NGP Funds. References to “NGP Funds” are to a family of energy-focused private equity investments funds advised by NGP, including NGP Natural Resources XII, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“NGP XII”). References to “equity-linked securities” are to any securities of the Company or any of our subsidiaries which are convertible into, or exchangeable or exercisable for, equity securities of the Company or such subsidiary, including any securities issued by the Company or any of our subsidiaries which are pledged to secure any obligation of any holder to purchase equity securities of the Company or any of our subsidiaries. References to the “SEC” are to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. References to our “Public Offering” refer to our initial public offering, which closed on July 30, 2019 (the “Closing Date”). References to “public shares” are to shares of our Class A common stock sold as part of the units in our Public Offering. References to “public stockholders” are to the holders of our public shares.


SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain

This annual report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements could include, among other things statements regarding the future financial performance of ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (“ChargePoint” or the “Company,” or “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms), as well as ChargePoint’s strategy, future operations, future operating results, financial position, expectations regarding revenue, losses, and costs, margins and prospects, as well as management plans and objectives. All statements, other than statements of present or historical fact included in this Annual Report, on Form 10-K may constitute “forward-looking statements” for purposes of the federal securities laws. Ourare forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding ourby terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “project” or our management team’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentionsnegatives of such terms and other similar expressions that predict or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations ofindicate future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions,trends or that are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-lookingnot statements but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-lookingpresent or historical matters. These statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may include, for example, statements about:

our ability to select an appropriate target business or businesses;

our ability to complete our initial business combination;

our expectations around the performance of the prospective target business or businesses;

our success in retaining or recruiting, or changes required in, our officers, key employees or directors following our initial business combination;

our officers and directors allocating their time to other businesses and potentially having conflicts of interest with our business or in approving our initial business combination;

our potential ability to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination;

our pool of prospective target businesses;

the ability of our officers and directors to generate a number of potential acquisition opportunities;

our public securities’ potential liquidity and trading;

the lack of a market for our securities;

the use of proceeds not held in the trust account described below or available to us from interest income on the trust account balance;

the trust account not being subject to claims of third parties; or

our financial performance.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on ourvarious assumptions, whether or not identified herein, and on the current expectations of ChargePoint’s management and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated.are not predictions of actual performance. These forward-looking statements involveare provided for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to serve as, and must not be relied on by any investor as, a numberguarantee, an assurance, a prediction or a definitive statement of, fact or probability. Actual events and circumstances are difficult or impossible to predict and may differ from assumptions, and such differences may be material. Many actual events and circumstances are beyond the control of ChargePoint. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or otherand assumptions about ChargePoint that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or performanceachievements to be materially different from thoseany future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. If any of these risks materialize or ChargePoint’s assumptions prove incorrect, actual results could differ materially from the results implied by these forward-looking statements. There may be additional risks that ChargePoint does not presently know or that ChargePoint currently believes are immaterial that could also cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements reflect ChargePoint’s expectations, plans or forecasts of future events and views as of the date hereof. ChargePoint anticipates that subsequent events and developments will cause ChargePoint’s assessments to change. These risksforward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing ChargePoint’s assessments as of any date subsequent to the date hereof. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed upon the forward-looking statements. ChargePoint cautions you that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risk and uncertainties, include, butmost of which are all difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of ChargePoint.

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements:
supply chain disruptions, delays, component shortages and expense increases, including those associated with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the conflict between Ukraine and Russia may adversely affect our sales, revenue and gross margins;
delays in new product introductions;
ChargePoint’s ability to expand its business in Europe;
ChargePoint’s ability to integrate newly acquired assets and businesses into ChargePoint’s own business and the expected benefits from newly acquired assets to ChargePoint, its customers and its market position;
the electric vehicle (“EV”) market and deliveries of passenger and fleet vehicles may not limited to, those factors described under “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.” Should onegrow as expected;
ChargePoint may not attract a sufficient number of fleet owners or more of these risksoperators as customers;
incentives from governments or uncertaintiesutilities may not materialize or may be reduced, which could reduce demand for EVs, or the portion of regulatory credits that customers claim may increase, which would reduce ChargePoint’s revenue from such incentives;
the impact of competing technologies or technological changes that result in reduced demand for EVs or other adverse effects on the EV market or our business;
data security breaches or other network outages;
ChargePoint’s ability to remediate its material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting;
ChargePoint’s success in retaining or recruiting, or changes in, its officers, key employees or directors;
changes in applicable laws or regulations;
ChargePoint’s ability to maintain a strong balance sheet and to raise capital as needed to support its business and pursue growth opportunities; and
3

the possibility that ChargePoint may be adversely affected by other economic factors including macroeconomic conditions such as inflation, rising interest rates, foreign exchange volatility, adverse developments in the financial service industry, slower growth or recession or other business factors or other competitive factors.
The foregoing review of important factors should anynot be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other risk factors included herein. Forward-looking statements reflect current views about ChargePoint’s plans, strategies and prospects, which are based on information available as of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. We undertakethe date of this Annual Report. Except to the extent required by applicable law, ChargePoint undertakes no obligation (and expressly disclaims any such obligation) to update or revise anythe forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

ii

otherwise.

4


PART I

Item 1. Business.

Introduction

We are

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (“ChargePoint”) is a blank check company incorporatedleading electric vehicle (“EV”) charging technology solutions provider. ChargePoint is broadly driving the shift to electric mobility by providing networked charging solutions in North America and Europe across commercial (e.g., retail, workplace, hospitality, parking, recreation, municipal, education and highway fast charge), fleet (e.g., delivery, take home, logistics, motor pool, transit and shared mobility) and residential (e.g., single family homes and multi-family apartments and condominiums) verticals. As of January 31, 2023, ChargePoint has activated approximately 225,000 ports on May 10, 2019 asits network, including approximately 18,900 direct current, or “DC,” “fast charging” ports, excluding single family home ports. ChargePoint’s roaming integrations enable EV drivers to access more than 465,000 additional third-party ports in North America and Europe through ChargePoint’s mobile and in-dash applications.

ChargePoint believes its business model is distinct in the EV charging industry. ChargePoint sells networked charging hardware, connected through cloud-based software services (“Cloud” or “Cloud Services”) and supported by extended parts and labor warranty solutions (“Assure”). ChargePoint sells these solutions to commercial, fleet and residential customers to enable electrification, and has developed a Delaware corporationstrong network of channel partners and formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganizationdistributors to support its growth. ChargePoint does not sell networked charging hardware without its software, typically does not own or similar business combination with one or more businesses. We have reviewed,operate EV charging assets, does not monetize drivers, and continue to review, a number of opportunities to enter into an initial business combination with an operating business, but we aredoes not able to determine at this time whether we will complete an initial business combination with any of the target businesses that we have reviewed or with any other target business.

Prior to our Public Offering, on May 16, 2019, our Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 8,625,000 shares of our Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Founder Shares”), for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000, or approximately $0.003 per share. Our Sponsor agreed to forfeit up to 1,125,000 Founder Shares to the extent that the overallotment option for the Public Offering was not exercised in full by the underwriters. In July 2019, our Sponsor transferred 40,000 Founder Shares to each of our independent director nominees at their original purchase price. In September 2019, the underwriters purchased 1,411,763 of the Overallotment Units (as defined below), and the remaining overallotment option subsequently expired. As a result, our Sponsor forfeited an aggregate of 772,059 Founder Shares. The holders of our Founder Shares (including our Sponsor and our independent directors) are referred to herein as our “initial stockholders.”

On the Closing Date, we consummated our Public Offering of 30,000,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds to us of $300.0 million. Each unit (“Unit”) consists of one share of our Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and one-third of one warrant (“Warrant”). Each whole Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of our Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment. Simultaneously with the consummation of the Public Offering, we completed the private sale of 5,333,333 private placement warrants (the “Private Placement Warrants”) at a purchase price of $1.50 per warrant to our Sponsor, generating gross proceeds to us of approximately $8.0 million. Each Private Placement Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of our Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment.

In connection with the Public Offering, the underwriters of the Public Offering were granted an option to purchase up to an additional 4,500,000 units (the “Overallotment Units”). On September 4, 2019, the underwriters partially exercised their overallotment option and, on September 6, 2019, the underwriters purchased 1,411,763 of the Overallotment Units at an offering price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds to us of approximately $14.1 million. Simultaneously withrely upon profits from the sale of these Overallotment Units, we completed a private placement with our Sponsorelectricity. By pursuing this “capital light” business model, ChargePoint has been able to focus its investments on research and development of its diverse portfolio of networked Level 2, or alternating current (“AC”), and Level 3 DC fast charging hardware, and its software solutions for an additional 188,235 Private Placement Warrants at a purchase price of $1.50 per warrant, generating gross proceeds of approximately $282,000.

We received gross proceeds fromdrivers, hosts and fleet operators, while simultaneously scaling active networked ports more cost efficiently as compared to other models in the Public OfferingEV industry, where the charging station operator, or “CPO,” owns and operates the charging station and depends upon profits on the sale of electricity. Finally, ChargePoint believes its go-to-market strategy of ensuring site owners or CPOs have full control over branding, access, pricing and policies, enables them to provide their employees and customers a better charging experience.


ChargePoint’s networked charging solutions can charge most types of EVs—from cars, trucks and delivery vehicles to buses and 18-wheelers—regardless of manufacturer. ChargePoint believes it will benefit directly and proportionately from the Private Placement Warrantsbroad trend in vehicle electrification because the breadth of its solutions means it does not need to identify which vehicles will come to market first nor which segments or manufacturers will be successful. For example, as an early entrant in the EV charging industry, ChargePoint has seen a correlation between new passenger EV sales in North America and its charging port growth in North America, which gives ChargePoint confidence in its growth prospects going forward as its verticals and geographic markets continue to go electric.
ChargePoint believes its distinct business model, breadth of offerings and increasing scale are also supported by significant positive trends in the industry. In the last several years, most major manufacturers of passenger cars, trucks of all sizes, buses and industrial vehicles have committed to electrification, and governments have made it clear from both policy and funding perspectives that the future of transportation is electric. For example, passenger EV sales are expected to increase from 2% of new vehicles sold in 2019 to 44% in 2030 in the United States and 3% of new vehicles sold in 2019 to 60% in 2030 in Europe according to the Bloomberg New Energy Finance Electric Vehicle Outlook (the “BNEF Report” issued in February 2023). Additional factors propelling this shift to vehicle electrification include existing and proposed fossil fuel bans or restrictions, transit electrification mandates and utility and government incentive programs. With these trends, the BNEF Report projects that the cumulative EV charging infrastructure investment in North America and Europe is expected to be approximately $314.1$178 billion by 2030 and increase to approximately $505 billion by 2040.
ChargePoint is focused on supporting a sustainable future. Since 2007, ChargePoint estimates it has powered over 5 billion electric miles driven, avoiding use of more than 220 million gallons of gasoline and $8.3the emission of over 1 million respectively,metric tons of greenhouse gases as of January 31, 2023. ChargePoint estimates the avoided amount of greenhouse gas emissions equates to planting approximately 22 million tree seedlings, capturing carbon from 1.6 million acres of U.S. forests or recycling 57 million bags of waste, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies.
The ChargePoint Model and Network Effect for EV Fueling
ChargePoint believes fueling EVs is radically different from the current “gas station” model for fueling traditional gas-powered vehicles. Passenger vehicles spend 95% of their time parked, and most fleet vehicles also have substantial “dwell time.” Unlike gasoline, electricity is pervasively and safely distributed, so fueling can shift to a model where vehicles charge where they are parked and while their drivers—individual or fleet—are engaged in other activities.
Accordingly, with application-specific exceptions such as occasional trips beyond a passenger vehicle’s battery range or the need to support fleet depots, ChargePoint believes EV charging will principally transition from an aggregate of approximately $322.4 million. Approximately $314.1 millioninconvenient, dedicated stop at a destination to convenient charging mapped to the dwell time, and for certain fleet applications, the size and route requirements, of the gross proceeds were deposited into a U.S. based trust account (the “Trust Account”), with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee (“Trustee”). The approximately $314.1 millionvehicle. These factors in turn drive the selection of net proceeds held in the Trust Account includes approximately $10.9 million of deferred underwriting discountscharging solutions, since ChargePoint estimates that DC ports are 10 times or more expensive than AC ports to purchase and commissions that will be releasedinstall, and significantly more expensive to operate due to the underwritershigher charging rate. In short, our customers want to choose the most cost-effective solutions for their vehicle charging applications, which can be AC or DC only or a blend, based on their specific needs. ChargePoint has developed a comprehensive platform of AC and DC charging products, Cloud subscriptions, Assure warranty coverages and professional services designed to ensure it can cost effectively deliver the solutions that best meet the customer’s specific requirements.
5


ChargePoint’s comprehensive portfolio is vital because its customers’ requirements vary by use case. For example, ChargePoint believes passenger EV drivers will typically charge overnight at home or during the day at work, top-up with AC charging while parked at a shopping center or other commercial locations for a few hours, and access DC charging for occasional road trips beyond their battery range. For fleet, ChargePoint believes fleet vehicles will also typically charge overnight, but with charging infrastructure mapped to vehicle types, dwell time and route lengths. Most fleets will use either all AC or a blend of AC and DC, with heavier duty applications using only DC. And in all cases, ChargePoint’s model is to provide the owner of the Public Offering upon completioninfrastructure full control of branding, access, pricing and policies.
From a network effect perspective, ChargePoint’s goals are ubiquity, accessibility, useability and reliability. Charging infrastructure should be broadly distributed, easily found, easy to use and should always work. ChargePoint believes its ports under management and roaming relationships support one of the largest and growing networks of EV charging infrastructures available. Charging ports are easily located via ChargePoint’s mobile and in-dash applications, and ChargePoint’s networked hardware is easy to use through those applications and to manage via its Cloud services provided to hosts. And most importantly, ChargePoint’s networked hardware is designed for high uptime, monitored and managed through our initial business combination. Of the gross proceeds from the Public OfferingCloud application, and supported via our customer support organization and a large network of service partners. These attributes and mobile and in-dash applications create a charging network that encourages hosts and drivers to expand with ChargePoint.
The Portfolio
ChargePoint primarily generates revenue through the sale of networked charging hardware combined with its Cloud Services billed as a subscription. ChargePoint also provides an extended parts and labor warranty, Assure, as an annual subscription. ChargePoint offers both an upfront sale of the Private Placement Warrants that werecharging station hardware with separate subscriptions for Cloud Services and Assure, or ChargePoint as a Service, referred to as CPaaS, in which charging station hardware, Cloud Services and Assure are bundled into a multi-year or annual subscription.
Hardware Portfolio Powered by Cloud Services. ChargePoint believes it offers among the industry’s leading hardware for AC and DC charging and does not depositedsell these solutions without a Cloud Services subscription. ChargePoint’s solutions deliver differentiated features and high efficiency in power and footprint, with a modular and scalable architecture created for high availability, easy expansion and efficient serviceability. ChargePoint thoroughly tests its products, including interoperability checks for different types of EVs, for a range of functional, climate and environmental conditions and for high, long-term reliability. ChargePoint’s stations are available with customizable video and signage options for customers who want to promote their brand.
AC Solutions:
ChargePoint’s newest family of charging stations, the Trust Account, approximately $6.2 million was usedCP6000 series, is part of a complete commercial and fleet charging solution, including power management and enhanced maintenance services. The CP6000 family of charging stations feature dual SAE J1772 AC charging ports, is UL® and ENERGY STAR® certified as well as compliant with the ISO 15118 communication standard and can deliver up to pay underwriting discounts19.2kW per port.
ChargePoint’s CT4000 family of charging stations is UL® and commissionsENERGY STAR® certified. All CT4000 models offer one or two standard SAE J1772 AC charging ports with locking holsters, capable of delivering up to 7.2kW per port. With this standard connector, ChargePoint’s CT 4000 charging stations can charge almost any EV model in North America.
ChargePoint’s AC solutions further includes the Public Offering, $251,000 was used to repay loansCPF50 family of charging station designed for use in fleet and advances from our Sponsor,multi-family applications and the balance was reservedChargePoint Home Flex designed for fast, flexible home charging. Both the CPF50 and ChargePoint Home Flex are UL® and ENERGY STAR® certified with standard SAE J1772 AC charging ports making them safe, reliable, and energy efficient.
DC Solutions:
ChargePoint’s family of Express and Express Plus fast charging DC solutions are configurable and extensible solutions intended to pay accrued offeringserve high-powered charging applications necessary for interstate corridor, fueling and formation costs, business, legalconvenience applications. ChargePoint’s Express and accounting due diligence expensesExpress Plus fast charging DC solutions are compatible with global charging connector standards including CCS1, CCS2 and CHAdeMO connector types as well as ISO communication standards. ChargePoint’s Express products are capable of dispensing up to 62.5kW per port and up to 500kW per port depending on prospective acquisitionsconfiguration with Express Plus.
Advanced Cloud Services to Scale Charging Infrastructure. Cloud Services subscription enables commercial and continuing generalfleet customers to manage charging in their parking lots and administrative expenses.

depots. Features are tuned for a variety of settings. Retailers can optimize charging station locations and pricing for foot traffic and loyalty, employers can make fueling an efficient benefit to attract talent, parking operators can vary pricing to reflect market conditions, and fleet operators can manage use cases from

6


having drivers take their own vehicles home every day to high-power, high-complexity centralized fleet depots. Cloud Services capabilities include the functionality below.
Station and site host management: making charging accessible to the public or select users, simplifying management of multiple charging sites and their parking policies, enabling sub-hosts, delivery of analytics, utilization reporting, remote diagnosis and updates with the latest software features.
Host pricing and payment remittance capabilities: enabling site hosts or station owners to set pricing, including support for pricing scenarios (e.g., by driver group, time of day, idle status, energy dispensed, by session). Remittance is possible to one or many accounts.
Energy management: enabling stations to share circuits, oversubscribing electrical panels to add more ports beyond the peak electrical capacity, and supporting the creation of advanced groups and rules which enable energy use policies. Energy management can be integrated with support for building load management and integration with utility load management programs.
Driver management tools: enabling convenience features including specific user access via the ChargePoint connections system, the creation of driver groups to support a site host policy and the waitlist feature for drivers to reserve a place in line, among other features.
Integration with route planning systems for fleets: enabling on-budget deadline scheduling in accordance with energy rate structures and on-site energy storage. On-site and on-route charging are supported and fueling payment is facilitated by integration with leading fuel cards.
ChargePoint believes that as EV penetration rises, so does the importance of Cloud Services to help manage charging complexity. Some examples include:
The shares of our Class B common stock will automatically convert into shares of our Class A common stockability for commercial customers to adjust the rate at which vehicles charge to match the natural parking duration at the timesite and to avoid peak or demand charges.
Charging infrastructure made available to the public during the day can be reserved for private fleets at night. Fleet software integrations also offer load control, charging scheduling and alerts to reduce cost and improve reliability. The software is designed to integrate with fuel management systems, fleet operations software and vehicle telematics to enable seamless integration into fleet processes.
Ecosystem integrations enable drivers to access charging functionality via in-vehicle infotainment systems, consumer mobile applications, payment systems, mapping tools, home automation assistants, fleet fuel cards, wearables and residential utility programs.
All ChargePoint commercial ports are integrated into one network available to drivers who can use the ChargePoint mobile application to find charging locations, check availability, start sessions, pay for charging, use their ChargePoint account to roam across networks, access preferential pricing and loyalty offers and track the estimated avoidance of our initial business combination on a one-for-one basis, subjectCO2 emissions in comparison to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizationsthe use of liquid fuel.
Parts and Labor Warranty Subscriptions and Customer Support Foster Loyalty. ChargePoint offers the like. InAssure warranty services which include proactive monitoring, fast response times, parts and labor warranty, expert advice and robust reporting. ChargePoint also provides phone support in multiple languages to both site hosts and drivers. Rising EV adoption creates more awareness and utilization. ChargePoint believes the case that additional shares of Class A common stock, or equity-linked securities, are issued or deemed issued in excessquality of the amounts sold in our Public OfferingChargePoint experience generates driver satisfaction and relatedtherefore encourages customers to the closingpurchase additional networked chargers and Cloud Services, creating a virtuous cycle of the initial business combination, the ratio at which the shares of our Class B common stock will convert into shares of our Class A common stock will be adjusted (unless the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Class B common stock agreegrowth from customers expanding their charging capacity.
Go to waive such adjustment with respect to any such issuance or deemed issuance) so that the number of shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of all issued and outstanding shares of Class B common stock will equal, in the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 20% of the sum of the total number of all shares of common stock outstanding upon the completion of our Public Offering plus all shares of Class A common stock and equity-linked securities issued or deemed issued in connection with the business combination (excluding any securities issued or issuable to any seller in the initial business combination).

On September 16, 2019, we announced that holders of the Units sold in our Public Offering may elect to separately trade the shares of Class A common stock and Warrants included in the Units. The shares of Class A common stock and Warrants that are separated trade on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbols “SBE” and “SBE WS,” respectively. Those units not separated continue to trade on the NYSE under the symbol “SBE.U.”

Our Company

Our Sponsor is a portfolio company of NGP XII, an energy-focused private equity fund with a mandate to make investments in energy and natural resources, with an emphasis on investments in businesses and/or assets in: the upstream and midstream energy sectors, principallyMarket Strategy

ChargePoint sells networked charging solutions in North America (including, without limitation,and Europe, and as of January 31, 2023, its customers base includes 80% of the exploration and/2021 Fortune 50 list of companies. It is focused on three key verticals: commercial, fleet and residential.
Commercial: Commercial businesses already own or production of hydrocarbons,lease parking and many wish to electrify. These include retail centers, offices, medical complexes, schools, airports, municipalities, convenience stores, recreation centers and fast fueling sites, among others. ChargePoint believes commercial businesses view charging as essential and invest to attract tenants, employees, customers and visitors, generate direct and indirect income, and achieve sustainability goals. ChargePoint believes commercial businesses choose ChargePoint based on solution completeness (they are not responsible for being the ownership and management of mineral and royalty interests,integrator or support agent for drivers) and the processing, transportation, storage and/or quality that comes from designing hardware, software and services together. These customers benefit from drivers that are typically familiar with ChargePoint’s products and services, including access to a free, top-rated application, around-the-clock support, and integration to popular mapping platforms, payment systems and wearables. Brand awareness, education and demand marketing programs generate sales opportunities. ChargePoint accesses the commercial market via its direct sales force (inside and field teams) and by channel partners.
7

Fleet: Fleet customers are organizations that operate vehicle fleets in delivery/logistics, relatingsales/service/motor pool shared transit and ride-sharing service operators. ChargePoint believes these customers choose to hydrocarbons);electrify their fleets for economic reasons, as the comparative total cost of ownership compellingly favors electrification. EV charging solutions can help them design and fuel operations, manage operating costs and achieve sustainability goals. ChargePoint provides a flexible architecture of networked charging stations, Cloud Services subscriptions, professional services, support, monitoring and parts and labor warranties needed to support all use cases, from single vehicle take-home fleets to full-scale electrified depots. ChargePoint accesses the oilfieldfleet market via its direct sales force and related energy services sectors. Although we may pursue an acquisition opportunitya curated set of channel partners.
Residential: ChargePoint offers residential EV charging solutions for drivers in any business or industry, or one that does not fitsingle-family residences who want the convenience of fueling at home with NGP XII’s mandate, we intend to capitalize on the ability of our management teamto optimize energy costs and full integration with the broader NGP platformsame mobile application they use for charging away from home. Residential charging solutions include the capability to identify, acquiremanage grid load in conjunction with utility programs and operate a business in the energy industry that may provideEV fueling rate programs. ChargePoint accesses single-family residential opportunities for attractive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders.

We intend to identify and acquire a business that could benefit from a hands-on owner with extensive operational experience in the energy sector and the public company expertise our management team possesses, or that relies on the target’s executive and operational expertise but presents potential for an attractive risk-adjusted return profile under our stewardship. Even fundamentally sound companies can often under-perform their potential due to underinvestment, a temporary period of dislocation in the markets in which they operate, over-levered capital structures, excessive cost structures, incomplete management teams and/or inappropriate business strategies. Our management team has extensive experience in identifying and executing such full-potential acquisitions in the energy industry. In addition, our team has significant hands-on experience working with private companies in preparing for and executing an initial public offering and serving as active owners and directors by working closely with these companies to continue their transformations and help create value in the public markets.


We believe that our management team is well positioned to identify attractive risk-adjusted returns in the marketplace and that its contacts and transaction sources, ranging from industry executives, private owners, private equity funds, and investment bankers, in additionthrough direct marketing to the energy industry reach ofconsumer using proprietary and third-party e-commerce platforms. For apartments and condominium settings, ChargePoint offers landlords and owner associations the NGP platform, will enable us to pursue a broad range of opportunities. Our management believes that its ability to identifyoffer charging billed directly to the tenant. ChargePoint also offers customer support around-the-clock and implement value creationin multiple languages. ChargePoint accesses this residential aspect via marketing and direct and channel partners.

Because ChargePoint rarely owns and operates charging infrastructure, it is able to allocate capital strategically towards ChargePoint’s initiatives will remain centralin research and development, marketing and sales and public policy.
Research and Development. With a singular focus on EV charging, ChargePoint offers a complete set of networked charging solutions for most EV charging use cases in North America and Europe.
Go to its differentiated acquisition strategy.

Scott McNeill, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial OfficerMarket. ChargePoint has built a strong marketing and director, has over 20 years of experiencesales engine in the energy industry. Mr. McNeill served as Chief Financial Officer of RSP Permian, Inc. (“RSP”) from April 2013 through the completion of its acquisition by Concho Resources, Inc. (“Concho”)North America and Europe, with an established direct sales channel, digital marketing capability and substantial channel sales. ChargePoint’s success is dependent in July 2018. Mr. McNeill also served as a member of the board of directors of RSP from December 2013 through July 2018. Mr. McNeill joined RSP prior to its initial public offering in January 2014 (“IPO”)part upon establishing and helped build the organization during its early growth phase while positioning it for its IPO. During Mr. McNeill’s tenure at RSP, RSP’s production grew from approximately 2,500 barrels of oil equivalents (“boe”) per day to approximately 80,000 boe per day, and RSP executed over $13 billion in M&A transactions and approximately $7 billion of financings. Before joining RSP, Mr. McNeill served as a managing director in the energy investment banking group of Raymond James Financial, Inc., advising companies operating in the exploration and production, midstream, and energy service and equipment segments of the energy industry. Mr. McNeill holds a B.B.A from Baylor University and an M.B.A from the University of Texas at Austin and is a certified public accountant in the State of Texas.

Jim Mutrie, our Chief Commercial Officer, General Counsel, Secretary and director, served as RSP’s Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from June 2014 through the completion of the acquisition of RSP by Concho in July 2018. During his tenure, Mr. Mutrie led the negotiation and execution of approximately $13 billion of M&A transactions and over $6 billion of financings, and oversaw Legal, Information Technology, Health and Safety, Human Resources and Government Affairs at RSP. While at RSP, Mr. Mutrie was a board member of the Texas Oil and Gas Association, the largest and oldest group in Texas representing petroleum interests. Prior to RSP, Mr. Mutrie served as General Counsel and Compliance Officer at United Surgical Partners International (NASDAQ: USPI). From October 2003 to January 2007, Mr. Mutrie practiced corporate law at Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., representing public and private companies in M&A transactions and capital market offerings, predominantly in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Mutrie holds a B.A. from Cornell University, a J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law, a Certificate in Financial Management from Cornell University and a Certificate in Financial Skills for The Energy Industry from SMU Cox School of Business, Executive Education.

Josh Rosinski, our Chief Operating Officer, joined RSP in September 2014 and served as RSP’s Vice President of Reservoir Engineering from February 2017 through the completion of RSP’s acquisition by Concho in July 2018. At RSP, Mr. Rosinski led the valuation and technical analysis of M&A opportunities and oversaw the company’s corporate engineering functions, including production forecasting and budgeting, reserve additions and RSP’s asset development efforts. Prior to RSP, Josh served as Vice President of Engineering at Simmons & Company International (“Simmons & Co.”) in the upstream advisory group where he directed engineering valuations supporting transactions acrossmaintaining relationships with a variety of basins across the continental United States. Priorchannel partners that it utilizes to Simmons & Co., Mr. Rosinski managedextend its geographic reach and implemented completion engineering operationsmarket penetration. ChargePoint uses a two-tiered, indirect fulfillment model whereby ChargePoint sells its products and services to its distributors, which in the East Texas Haynesville asset for Exco Resources, Inc. Mr. Rosinski began his career at Devon Energy Corporation in Houston and worked in multiple operational, reservoir, and corporate engineering functions throughout Texas and Louisiana assets. Mr. Rosinski graduated from Texas A&M with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering.

Our Sponsor is a portfolio company of NGP XII, and is owned by NGP XII and certain members of our management team. NGP has considerable experience investing in the energy industry. Since NGP’s founding in 1988, NGP Funds have raised approximately $20.0 billion of capital commitments from investors and invested in more than 215 portfolio companies across 12 private funds. NGP has experience investing across a variety of commodity price cycles and a track record of identifying high-quality assets, businesses and management teams with significant resources, capital and optimization potential.

The past performance of our management team and NGP is not a guarantee either (i) of success with respectturn sell to any business combination we may consummate or (ii)resellers, which then sell to end users. ChargePoint refers to these end users as its customers. ChargePoint anticipates that weit will be ablecontinue to identify a suitable candidate for our initial business combination. You should not rely on the historical recordthis two-tiered sales model in order to help facilitate sales of our management’s or NGP’s performance as indicative of our future performance.

Business Strategy

Our acquisitionChargePoint’s products and value creation strategy is to identify, acquire and, after our initial business combination, build a company in the energy industry in North America that complements the experience of our management team and can benefit from its operational expertise and/or executive oversight. Our acquisition strategy will leverage our team’s network of potential proprietary and public transaction sources where we believe a combination of our relationships, knowledge and experience in the energy industry could effect a positive transformation or augmentation of existing businesses or properties to improve their overall value proposition. Our goal is to form a focused business with multiple competitive advantages and the potential to generate cash flow in excess of its capital. We would expect to grow theits business over time, both organicallyinternationally. ChargePoint also has nationwide and through acquisitions,local partners who sell, install and maintain ChargePoint solutions.

Public Policy. ChargePoint has also supported early and sustained investments in government and utility relationships. ChargePoint advocates for policies that advance electric mobility and ensure a healthy industry with a focus on consistently achieving attractive returnscompetition, innovation and customer choice, including:
Support for vehicle electrification policy and climate action, such as zero emission vehicle requirements, fossil fuel bans and transit electrification directives;
Partnership with North America’s leading utilities to scale the new electric fueling network, including enabling the resale of electricity, securing fast charging-friendly tariffs, developing make-ready programs, creating customer incentive programs and informing utility commission decisions and legislation; and
Reduction in barriers to infrastructure deployment including construction costs, permitting, building codes and right to charge policies for renters and tenants.
Competition
ChargePoint believes its business model is unique. Others in the EV charging landscape consist principally of (i) manufacturers of non-networked hardware charging systems, such as ABB Ltd. and Tritium DCFC Ltd, (ii) software providers that offer solutions to access and manage such non-networked hardware charging systems, (iii) CPOs that acquire access to sites and leverage third-party hardware and software to build out charging infrastructure to sell energy, such as EVgo, Inc. and Electrify America, and (iv) e-mobility service and software providers, or eMSPs, that focus on enabling EV drivers to access third-party charging systems.

ChargePoint does not compete directly with these models. ChargePoint does not sell charging system hardware without its Cloud Services software. While ChargePoint is “network first” and may support a customer’s need to “on ramp” third-party hardware onto the ChargePoint network, ChargePoint’s focus is to provide the full functionality that comes with its integrated solutions. As a non-asset owner, ChargePoint does not compete directly with CPOs. And with respect to eMSPs, ChargePoint seeks to provide the best driver experience but does not monetize drivers.

ChargePoint thus believes its primary differentiators are:
comprehensive and fully integrated Cloud Services stack for all AC and DC charging system solutions for each charging vertical – commercial, fleet and residential;
8

size and scale of its networked charging system, including roaming partners;
variety and quality of networked charging system product offerings for AC and DC applications;
reliable product performance, testing and certifications;
ease of use of its Cloud Services, mobile and in-dash driver applications and features;
brand awareness;
quality of driver and charging system owner support; and
scale of operations.
ChargePoint believes it competes favorably with respect to each of these factors.
North America
ChargePoint believes it leads the North America market in the sale of commercial AC chargers. ChargePoint also has a strong market position in AC chargers for use at home or multifamily settings and high-power DC chargers for urban fast charging, corridor or long-trip charging and fleet applications. Because ChargePoint’s primary business model does not include owning and operating networked charging stations, ChargePoint believes its primary competitors include other OEMs, manufacturers and providers of EV charging station solutions, such as Blink Charging Co. in AC chargers; Wallbox N.V in AC residential chargers; and ABB Ltd. and Tritium DCFC Ltd. in DC chargers.
Europe
In Europe, ChargePoint primarily competes with smaller providers of EV charging solutions. The market in Europe is highly fragmented in terms of both providers and solutions, with many companies providing hardware only or software only, and few providing both. To succeed in a large, early-stage market such as Europe, providers must invest in early engagement across verticals and customers to gain market share, and in ongoing efforts to scale channels, installers, teams and processes. ChargePoint believes its portfolio breadth and range of Cloud solutions position it well to succeed broadly in Europe, and thus has invested, and will continue to invest, heavily in its strategy to establish a successful pan-European presence that maps to major pan-European customers and provides a seamless experience for drivers as they travel.
Growth Strategies
ChargePoint estimates it had approximately a 70% market share in publicly available networked AC charging in North America as of January 31, 2023. ChargePoint began European operations in late 2017 and currently operates in 16 European countries. It expects significant market opportunities for fleet solutions as fleet EVs begin to arrive in more meaningful volume. ChargePoint believes the breadth and quality of its networked EV charging solutions, market share and driver awareness typically lead to customer loyalty, whereby customers typically choose to expand their charging footprint with ChargePoint as EV penetration rises and/or charging utilization at their location increases. Over the years, ChargePoint’s customers have typically renewed their Cloud Services subscriptions and have expanded the number of charging ports they purchase from ChargePoint. Growth is also supported by comprehensive ecosystem integrations ChargePoint has enabled that keep the ChargePoint brand top of mind with drivers, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, consumer mobile applications, payment systems, mapping tools, home automation assistants, fleet fuel cards, wearables and residential utility programs.
ChargePoint’s growth strategies to continue to scale networked EV charging are as follows:
Accelerate alternative EV charging offerings. ChargePoint intends to maintain its leadership position with continued efficient investment in the development of charging station technologies and Cloud solutions. In addition, ChargePoint intends to expand its product offerings beyond its historical model of a site host or customer owning and operating charging as a capital expenditure. ChargePoint intends to enter into partnerships and maintaining conservative balance sheet metrics.


We plansimilar strategic relationships with third-party owners and operators of charging stations and alternative energy infrastructure providers to utilizeprovide customers a financed charging solution that enables customers to pay for charging infrastructure as an operational expense, and a turnkey charging solution that enables customers offering public charging to host a station at zero cost to them.

Invest incrementally in marketing and sales. In both North America and Europe, ChargePoint intends to continue attracting new customers and pursuing a “land-and-expand” model which encourages existing customers to increase their charging footprint with ChargePoint over time as EV penetration increases.
9

Manufacturing, Logistics and Fulfillment
ChargePoint designs its products in-house and outsources production to contract manufacturers based in the networkUnited States, Mexico and industry experienceEurope. The majority of ourits hardware products are manufactured in Mexico. Components are sourced from a number of global suppliers, with concentrations in the United States and Asia. ChargePoint deploys a global supply chain management team that works proactively with piece part and NGPfinal assembly supply partners. That supply management team readies factories for new products, puts in place and monitors quality control points, plans ongoing production, issues purchase orders and coordinates deliveries to distribution hubs that ChargePoint manages in North America and Europe.
ChargePoint works with third-party fulfillment partners that deliver its charging stations from multiple locations, which it believes allows it to reduce order fulfillment time and shipping costs.
Seasonality
Almost all of ChargePoint’s commercial and fleet charging stations are installed and utilized outdoors and ChargePoint operates and conducts its sales primarily in the Northern Hemisphere. Seasonal changes and other weather-related conditions can affect the sales volumes and installation rates of ChargePoint’s products, primarily due to the impact of winter weather on construction timelines and delays. In addition, many of ChargePoint’s customers complete their annual budget approval cycle in ChargePoint’s fourth quarter. Therefore, the financial results for any quarter do not necessarily indicate the results expected for the fiscal year. Normally, the highest sales and earnings are in ChargePoint’s fourth quarter and the lowest are in its first quarter, commencing in February annually.
Government Regulation
ChargePoint’s business is subject to a changing framework of laws and regulations at the federal, state, regional and local level as well as in foreign jurisdictions. For example, substantially all of ChargePoint’s manufacturing operations are subject to complex trade, import and customs laws, regulations and tax requirements such as sanctions orders or tariffs. In addition, the countries in which ChargePoint’s products are manufactured or imported may from time to time impose additional duties, tariffs or other restrictions on ChargePoint’s imports or adversely modify existing restrictions. Changes in tax policy or trade regulations or the imposition of new tariffs on imported products, could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s business, results of operations and competitive position. State, regional and local regulations for installation of EV charging stations also apply to ChargePoint and vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may include permitting requirements, inspection requirements, licensing of contractors and certifications as examples. Compliance with such regulation(s) may cause shipping, installation, or commissioning delays. ChargePoint is also subject to other complex foreign and United States laws and regulations related to anti-bribery and corruption laws, antitrust or competition laws and sanctions compliance, among others. ChargePoint has policies and procedures in place to promote compliance with these laws and regulations, however, government regulations are subject to change, and accordingly ChargePoint is unable to assess the possible effect of compliance with future requirements or whether ChargePoint’s compliance with such regulations, or failure to adequately comply, will adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, competitive position or ability to invest in capital expenditures in the future.
OSHA
ChargePoint is subject to the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, as amended (“OSHA”). OSHA establishes certain employer responsibilities, including maintenance of a workplace free of recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious injury, compliance with standards promulgated by OSHA and various record keeping, disclosure and procedural requirements. Various standards, including standards for notices of hazards, safety in excavation and demolition work and the handling of asbestos, may apply to ChargePoint’s operations. ChargePoint believes it is in full compliance with OSHA regulations.
Metrology
ChargePoint products are subject to regulations and certification requirements governing accuracy and other characteristics of embedded metrology for dispensing of electricity through charging stations. ChargePoint has received certification for some products in the European Union under the Measurement Instrument Directive (MID), in the United Kingdom under the Measurement Instrument Regulation (MIR), the United States under the National Type Evaluation Program (NTEP), and in California under the California Type Evaluation Program (CTEP) as regulated by the Department of Food and Agriculture Division of Measurement Standards. ChargePoint is in the process of seeking additional certifications on products in Germany and in the United States. Field testing to validate meter accuracy may also be carried out by various government entities responsible for ensuring the accuracy of transactions based on measured quantities, similar to the way gasoline pumps or grocery store scales are audited.
Privacy and Data Security Laws
ChargePoint is currently subject, and may in the future be subject, to numerous privacy and data security laws. For example, some U.S. states, members of the European Economic Area, the United Kingdom, Mexico, China, and many other jurisdictions in which ChargePoint operates or plans to operate have adopted some form of privacy and data security laws and regulations that impose significant compliance obligations.
10

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) covers the European Economic Area (“EEA”), and countries such as Switzerland and the UK have adopted similar regulations. Member states have and may impose stricter regulations for certain issues. The GDPR governs a wide range of data protection and security issues, including EEA residents’ control over personal data about them or relating to them, the disclosures and choices provided to those individuals, the documentation ChargePoint must maintain, requirements for certain contracts, the security and confidentiality of the personal data, the uses or “processing” of personal data, data breach notification, and the use of third-party entities to process personal data. The GDPR includes employee data among the personal data the regulation governs. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data outside of the EEA, designates each member state’s data supervisory authority as the enforcement body, and authorizes the imposition of large penalties for noncompliance, including the potential for significant fines. The GDPR requirements apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between ChargePoint and its subsidiaries, including employee information. The GDPR has increased ChargePoint’s responsibility and potential liability in relation to all EU personal data that ChargePoint processes and ChargePoint may be required to put in place additional mechanisms to ensure compliance with the GDPR, which could divert management’s attention and increase its cost of doing business, and despite ChargePoint’s ongoing efforts to bring its practices into compliance with the GDPR, it may not be successful.
ChargePoint is also subject to the e-Privacy Directive and the EU member states’ additions to and implementation of that directive. The e-Privacy Directive’s provisions include requirements concerning the use of cookies and other tracking technologies and the use of personal information in marketing, including requirements for consents to marketing emails and opt-outs. Similarly, the CAN-SPAM Act in the United States governs email marketing. These and other cookie, email and marketing regulations increase ChargePoint’s regulatory compliance obligations and risks.
Additionally, ChargePoint is governed by a California state privacy law called the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CCPA”), which contains requirements similar to the GDPR for the handling of personal information of California residents. The CCPA establishes a privacy framework for covered businesses, including an initialexpansive definition of personal information and data privacy rights for California residents. The CCPA includes a framework with potentially severe statutory damages and private rights of action. The CCPA requires covered companies to provide new disclosures to California consumers (as that word is broadly defined in the CCPA), and new ways for such consumers to opt-out of certain sales of personal information, and to allow for a new cause of action for data breaches. Further, California voters approved a new privacy law amending the CCPA, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) in November, 2020. Effective January 1, 2023, the CPRA significantly modifies the CCPA, including by expanding consumers’ rights with respect to certain sensitive personal information, and sunsetting exemptions for business-to-business personal information and employee information. The CPRA also creates a new state agency vested with authority to implement and enforce the CCPA and the CPRA. This new agency, known as the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) is authorized to implement regulations, and has drafted broad and new privacy requirements in this role. New legislation proposed or enacted in various other states will continue to shape the data privacy environment nationally. For example, Virginia enacted the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (“CDPA”), which became effective on January 1, 2023, the Colorado Privacy Act (“CPA”) which takes effect on July 1, 2023; the Utah Consumer Privacy Act (“UCPA”) which becomes effective December 1, 2023; and the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, which becomes effective on July 1, 2023. These state laws are similar to the CCPA and CPRA, but aspects of these state privacy statutes remain unclear, resulting in further legal uncertainty. The United States federal government is also considering legislation governing privacy and security issues, including the possibility of private rights of action. This creates legal uncertainty with respect to federal law as well as the impact such laws will have on state statutes. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) engages in regulatory investigations of privacy and security practices that may violate Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair methods of competition, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices affecting commerce. These regulatory investigations can lead to consent decrees or litigation with the FTC and the Department of Justice. FTC consent decrees often mandate detailed privacy and security programs with annual audits for up to twenty years. Furthermore, state attorneys general may also join together to file lawsuits based on violations of applicable state privacy acts. In the event ChargePoint is subject to litigation, penalties, or enforcement actions pursuant to the GDPR, CCPA, CPRA, the FTC or applicable state laws, ChargePoint may be subject to fines and penalties, remediation measures which will divert management’s time and attention, as well as harm to its reputation.
The GDPR, CCPA, CPRA, and other state laws exemplify the vulnerability of ChargePoint’s business combinationto the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data. Other states in the United States may pass or are considering privacy laws, and employing our acquisition strategy. Overadditional countries have in recent years implemented new privacy laws. ChargePoint’s compliance costs and potential liability may increase as the result of additional national and international regulatory requirements related to data privacy and data security.
Waste Handling and Disposal
ChargePoint is subject to laws and regulations regarding the handling and disposal of hazardous substances and solid wastes, including electronic wastes and batteries. These laws generally regulate the generation, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous waste, and may impose strict, joint and several liability for the investigation and remediation of areas where hazardous substances may have been released or disposed. For instance, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also known as the Superfund law, in the United States and comparable state laws impose liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These persons include current and prior owners or operators of the site where the release occurred as well as companies that disposed or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at the site. Under CERCLA, these persons may be subject to joint and several strict liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. CERCLA also authorizes the Environmental
11

Protection Agency and, in some instances, third-parties to act in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek to recover from the responsible classes of persons the costs they incur. ChargePoint may handle hazardous substances within the meaning of CERCLA, or similar state statutes, in the course of their careers, the members of our management teamordinary operations and, their affiliates have developed a broad network of contacts and corporate relationships that we believe will serve as a useful sourceresult, may be jointly and severally liable under CERCLA for all or part of acquisition opportunities. This network hasthe costs required to clean up sites at which these hazardous substances have been developed through our management team’s extensive experience inreleased into the environment.
ChargePoint also generates solid wastes, which may include hazardous wastes that are subject to the requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state statutes. While RCRA regulates both investing insolid and operatinghazardous wastes, it imposes strict requirements on the generation, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of hazardous wastes. Certain components of ChargePoint’s products are excluded from RCRA’s hazardous waste regulations, provided certain requirements are met. However, if these components do not meet all of the established requirements for the exclusion, or if the requirements for the exclusion change, ChargePoint may be required to treat such products as hazardous waste, which are subject to more rigorous and costly disposal requirements. Any changes in the energy industry. We will additionally leverage NGP’s considerable experience investinglaws and regulations, or ChargePoint’s ability to qualify the materials it uses for exclusions under such laws and regulations, could adversely affect ChargePoint’s operating expenses.
Similar laws exist in other jurisdictions where ChargePoint operates. Additionally, in the energy industry; since 1988, NGP Funds have raised approximately $20.0 billionEU, ChargePoint is subject to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive (“WEEE Directive”). The WEEE Directive provides for the creation of capital commitments from investorsa collection scheme where consumers return electrical and electronic equipment waste to merchants, such as ChargePoint. If ChargePoint fails to properly manage such electrical and electronic equipment waste, it may be subject to fines, sanctions, or other actions that may adversely affect ChargePoint’s financial operations.
Research and Development
ChargePoint has invested in more than 215 portfolio companies across 12 private funds.

Acquisition Criteria

Consistent with this strategy, we have identified the following general criteriasignificant time and guidelines that we believeexpense into research and development for its networked charging platform technologies and for its Cloud software. ChargePoint’s ability to maintain its leadership position depends upon its ongoing research and development activities. ChargePoint’s research and development team is responsible for designing, developing, manufacturing, testing and sustaining its products.

ChargePoint’s research and development teams are important in evaluating prospective targets. We will use these criteria and guidelines in evaluating acquisition opportunities, but we may decide to enter into our initial business combination with a target that does not meet these criteria and guidelines. We intend to acquire target businesses that we believe:

are fundamentally sound but that we believe can achieve better results by leveraging the operating and financial experience of our management team and NGP and/or combining these businesses into a public vehicle run by our management team;

can utilize the extensive networks and insights that our management team and NGP have built in the energy industry;

are at an inflection point, such as requiring additional management expertise, are able to innovate through new operational techniques, or where we believe we can drive improved financial performance;

exhibit unrecognized value or other characteristics, desirable returns on capital, and a need for capital to achieve the company’s growth strategy, that we believe have been misevaluated by the marketplace based on our analysis and due diligence review; and

will offer an attractive risk-adjusted return for our stockholders.

We will seek to acquire the target on terms and in a manner that leverages our management team’s experience investing within the energy industry. Potential upside from growthprimarily located in the target businessCompany’s headquarters in Campbell, California, its facilities in Gurgaon, India, and an improved capital structure will be weighed against any identified downside risks.

These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating toits European locations in Radstadt, Austria, Amsterdam, Netherlands and Reading, the meritsUnited Kingdom.

Intellectual Property
ChargePoint relies on a combination of a particular initial business combination may be based, to the extent relevant, on these general guidelinespatent, trademark, copyright, unfair competition and trade secret laws, as well as other considerations, factorsconfidentiality procedures and criteriacontractual restrictions, to establish, maintain and protect its proprietary rights. ChargePoint’s success depends in part upon its ability to obtain and maintain proprietary protection for ChargePoint’s products, technology and know-how, to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of others, and to prevent others from infringing ChargePoint’s proprietary rights.
As of January 31, 2023, ChargePoint had 89 U.S. patents issued and 45 U.S. pending non-provisional patent applications. Additionally, ChargePoint had 33 issued foreign patents and 15 foreign patent applications currently pending in various foreign jurisdictions. In addition, as of January 31, 2023, there were three pending Patent Cooperation Treaty applications. These patents relate to various EV charging station designs and/or EV charging functionality. Such issued patents and any patents derived from such applications or applications that our management may deem relevant. In the event that we decide to enter into our initial business combination with a target business that does not meet the above criteria and guidelines, we will disclose that the target business does not meet the above criteria in our stockholder communications related to our initial business combination, whichclaim priority from such applications, if granted, would be in the formexpected to expire between 2024 and 2042, excluding any additional term for patent term adjustments. ChargePoint cannot be assured that any of proxy solicitation or tender offer materials that we would file with the SEC.

Initial Business Combination

The NYSE rules require that we must complete one or more business combinations having an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the net assets held in trust (net of amounts disbursed to management for working capital purposes and excluding the amount of any deferred underwriting discount held in trust) at the time of the agreement to enter into the initial business combination. Our boardits patent applications will make the determination as to the fair market value of a target business or businesses. If our board is not able to independently determine the fair market value of a target business or businesses, we will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) or an independent accounting firm with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our board of directors, which must include a majority of our independent directors and each of the non-independent directors nominated by our Sponsor, to approve our initial business combination.


We may pursue an acquisition opportunity jointly with our Sponsor, or one or more other entities affiliated with NGP, including other NGP Funds, other NGP Fund portfolio companies, and/or one or more investors in the NGP Funds, which we refer to as an “Affiliated Joint Acquisition.” Any such parties may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such parties a class of equity or equity-linked securities. Any such issuance of equity or equity-linked securities would, on a fully diluted basis, reduce the percentage ownership of our then-existing stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of our Class B common stock, issuances or deemed issuances of Class A common stock or equity-linked securities would result in an adjustment to the ratio at which shares of Class B common stock shall convert into shares of Class A common stock such that our initial stockholders and their permitted transferees, if any, would retain their aggregate percentage ownership at 20% of the sum of the total number of all shares of common stock outstanding upon completion of our Public Offering plus all shares of Class A common stock and equity-linked securities issued or deemed issued in connection with the business combination (excluding any shares or equity-linked securities issued, or to be issued, to any seller in the business combination), unless the holders of a majority of the then-outstanding shares of Class B common stock agreed to waive such adjustment with respect to such issuance or deemed issuance at the time thereof. Our Sponsor and its affiliates have no obligation to make any such investment, and may compete with us for potential business combinations.

We anticipate structuring our initial business combination either (i) in such a way so that the post-transaction company in which our public stockholders own shares will own or acquire 100% of the equity interests or assets of the target business or businesses, or (ii) in such a way so that the post-transaction company owns or acquires less than 100% of such interests or assets of the target business in order to meet certain objectives of the target management team or stockholders, or for other reasons, including an Affiliated Joint Acquisition as described above. However, we will only complete a business combination if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). Even if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our stockholders prior to the business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post-transaction company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business combination transaction. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial number of new shares in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we would acquire a 100% controlling interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new shares, our stockholders immediately priorpatent or whether the examination process will require ChargePoint to our initial business combination could own less than a majority of our outstanding shares subsequent to our initial business combination. If less than 100%narrow the scope of the equity interests or assets of a target business or businesses are owned or acquired by the post-transaction company, the portion of such business or businesses that is owned or acquired is what will be valued for purposes of the 80% of net assets test. If the business combination involves more than one target business, the 80% of net assets test will be based on the aggregate value of all of the transactions and we will treat the target businesses together as the initial business combination for seeking stockholder approval or for purposes of a tender offer, as applicable.

Our Acquisition Process

In evaluating a prospective target business, we expect to conduct a thorough due diligence review that will encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent management and employees, document reviews, inspection of facilities, as well as a review of financial and other information that will be made available to us. We will also utilize our operational and capital allocation experience.

We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our Sponsor, officers or directors. In the event we seek to complete our initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our Sponsor, officers or directors, we, or a committee of independent directors, will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA or an independent accounting firm that our initial business combination is fair to the Company from a financial point of view.

NGP XII, members of our management team (other than members of our board of directors who are employees of NGP), and our independent directors own (directly or indirectly) Founder Shares and/or Private Placement Warrants. Through their direct or indirect interest in NGP XII, members of our board of directors who are employees of NGP currently own an indirect interest in us. Each member of our management team may have a conflict of interest in determining whether a particular target business is an appropriate business with which to effectuate our initial business combination. Further, each of our officers and directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a particular business combination if the retention or resignation of any such officers and directors was included by a target business as a condition to any agreement with respect to our initial business combination.


Certain of our directors presently have,claims sought. ChargePoint’s issued patents, and any of our officers and directors in the future patents issued to ChargePoint, may have additional, fiduciarybe challenged, invalidated or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a business combination opportunity. Accordingly, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity that is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such opportunity to such other entity. We do not believe, however, that the fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of our officers or directors will materially affect our ability to complete our business combination. In addition, we may pursue an Affiliated Joint Acquisition opportunity with an entity to which an officer or director has a fiduciary or contractual obligation. Any such entity may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such entity a class of equity or equity-linked securities. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Company and such opportunity is one we are legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue.

Our Sponsor, officers and directors have agreed not to participate in the formation of, or become an officer or director of, any other blank check company until we have entered into a definitive agreement regarding our initial business combination or we have failed to complete our initial business combination within the required timeframe.

Our Management Team

Members of our management team are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters but they intend to devote as much of their time as they deem necessary to our affairs until we have completed our initial business combination. The amount of time that any members of our management team will devote in any time period will vary based on whether a target business has been selected for our initial business combination and the current stage of the business combination process.

Over the course of their careers, the members of our management team have developed a broad network of contacts and corporate relationships. This network has grown through the activities of our management team sourcing, acquiring and financing businesses, our management team’s relationships with sellers, financing sources and target management teams and the experience of our management team in executing transactions under varying economic and financial market conditions. See “Part III, Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” for a more complete description of our management team’s experience.

Status as a Public Company

We believe our structure will make us an attractive business combination partner to target businesses. As an existing public company, we offer a target business an alternative to the traditional initial public offering through a merger or other business combination with us. In a business combination transaction with us, the owners of the target business may, for example, exchange their shares of stock in the target business for shares of our Class A common stock (or shares of a new holding company) or for a combination of shares of our Class A common stock and cash, allowing us to tailor the consideration to the specific needs of the sellers. Although there are various costs and obligations associated with being a public company, we believe target businesses will find this method a more certain and cost-effective method to becoming a public company than the typical initial public offering. The typical initial public offering process takes a significantly longer period of time than the typical business combination transaction process, and there are significant expenses in the initial public offering process, including underwriting discounts and commissions, thatcircumvented, may not be present to the same extent in connection with a business combination with us.


Furthermore, once a proposed business combination is completed, the target business will have effectively become public, whereas an initial public offering is always subject to the underwriters’ ability to complete the offering, as well as general market conditions, which could delay or prevent the offering from occurring or could have negative valuation consequences. Once public, we believe the target business would then have greater access to capital, an additional means of providing management incentives consistent with stockholders’ interestsprovide sufficiently broad protection and the ability to use its equity as currency for acquisitions. Being a public company can offer further benefits by augmenting a company’s profile among potential new customers and vendors and aid in attracting talented employees.

While we believe that our structure and our management team’s backgrounds will make us an attractive business partner, some potential target businesses may view our status as a blank check company, such as our lack of an operating history and our ability to seek stockholder approval of any proposed initial business combination, negatively.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the prices of our securities may be more volatile.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our Public Offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion (as adjusted for inflation pursuant to SEC rules from time to time), or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Class A common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.

Effecting our Initial Business Combination

We intend to effectuate our initial business combination using cash from the proceeds of our Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, our capital stock, debt or a combination of the foregoing. We may seek to complete our initial business combination with a company or business that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth, which would subject us to the numerous risks inherent in such companies and businesses.

If our initial business combination is paid for using equity or debt securities, or not all of the funds released from the Trust Account are used for payment of the consideration in connection with our business combination or used for redemptions of purchases of our Class A common stock, we may apply the balance of the cash released to us from the Trust Account for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion of operations of the post-transaction company, the payment of principal or interest due on indebtedness incurred in completing our initial business combination, to fund the purchase of other companies or for working capital.

Although our management will assess the risks inherent in a particular target business with which we may combine, we cannot assure you that this assessment will result in our identifying all risks that a target business may encounter. Furthermore, some of those risks may be outside of our control, meaning that we can do nothing to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely affect a target business.


We may need to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination, either because the transaction requires more cash than is available from the proceeds held in the Trust Account or because we become obligated to redeem a significant number of shares of our Class A common stock upon completion of the business combination, in which case we may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such business combination. There are no prohibitions on our ability to issue securities or incur debt in connection with our initial business combination. We are not currently a party to any arrangement or understanding with any third party with respect to raising any additional funds through the sale of securities, the incurrence of debt or otherwise.

Sources of Target Businesses

We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a business combination target that is affiliated with our Sponsor, officers or directors, or from making the acquisition through a joint venture or other form of shared ownership with our Sponsor, officers or directors. In the event we seek to complete our initial business combination with a business combination target that is affiliated with our Sponsor, officers or directors, we, or a committee of independent directors, would obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA or an independent accounting firm that such an initial business combination is fair to the Company from a financial point of view. We are not required to obtain such an opinion in any other context.

If any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity that falls within the line of business of any entity to which he or she has pre-existing fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she may be required to present such business combination opportunity to such entity prior to presenting such business combination opportunity to us. Our officers and directors currently have certain relevant fiduciary duties or contractual obligations that may take priority over their duties to us. We may pursue an Affiliated Joint Acquisition opportunity with an entity to which an officer or director has a fiduciary or contractual obligation. Any such entity may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such entity a class of equity or equity-linked securities.

Selection of a Target Business and Structuring of our Initial Business Combination

The NYSE rules require that our initial business combination must occur with one or more target businesses that together have an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the net assets held in the Trust Account (net of amounts disbursed to management for working capital purposes and excluding the amount of any deferred underwriting discount held in trust) at the time of the agreement to enter into the initial business combination. The fair market value of the target or targets will be determined by our board of directors based upon one or more standards generally accepted by the financial community, such as discounted cash flow valuation or value of comparable businesses. If our board is not able to independently determine the fair market value of the target business or businesses, we will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA or from an independent accounting firm with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria. We do not intend to purchase multiple businesses in unrelated industries in conjunction with our initial business combination. Subject to this requirement, our management will have virtually unrestricted flexibility in identifying and selecting one or more prospective target businesses, although we will not be permitted to effectuate our initial business combination with another blank check company or a similar company with nominal operations.

In any case, we will only complete an initial business combination in which we own or acquire 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquire an interest in the target sufficient for the post-transaction company not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. If we own or acquire less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of a target business or businesses, the portion of such business or businesses that are owned or acquired by the post-transaction company is what will be valued for purposes of the NYSE’s 80% of net assets test.

To the extent we effect our business combination with a company or business that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in such company or business. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.


In evaluating a prospective target business, we expect to conduct a thorough due diligence review, which may encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent management and employees, document reviews, interviews of customers and suppliers, inspection of facilities, as applicable, as well as a review of financial, operational, legal and other information which will be made available to us. If we determine to move forward with a particular target, we will proceed to structure and negotiate the terms of the business combination transaction.

Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and evaluation of, and negotiation with, a prospective target business with which our business combination is not ultimately completed will result in our incurring losses and will reduce the funds we can use to complete another business combination. The Company will not pay any consulting fees to members of our management team, or any of their respective affiliates, for services rendered to or in connection with our initial business combination.

Lack of Business Diversification

For an indefinite period of time after the completion of our initial business combination, the prospects for our success may depend entirely on the future performance of a single business. Unlike other entities that have the resources to complete business combinations with multiple entities in one or several industries, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations and mitigate the risks of being in a single line of business. In addition, we intend to focus our search for an initial business combination in a single industry. By completing our business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

subject us to negative economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact on the particular industry in which we operate after our initial business combination, and

cause us to depend on the marketing and sale of a single product or limited number of products or services.

Limited Ability to Evaluate the Target’s Management Team

Although we intend to closely scrutinize the management of a prospective target business when evaluating the desirability of effecting our business combination with that business, our assessment of the target business’s management may not prove to be correct.enforceable inactions against alleged infringers.

ChargePoint enters into agreements with its employees, contractors, customers, partners and other parties with which it does business to limit access to and disclosure of its technology and other proprietary information. ChargePoint cannot be certain that the steps it has taken will be sufficient or effective to prevent the unauthorized access, use, copying or the reverse engineering of ChargePoint’s technology and other proprietary information, including by third-parties who may use its technology or other proprietary information to develop products and services that compete with ChargePoint’s. Moreover, others may independently develop technologies that are competitive with ChargePoint or that infringe on, misappropriate or otherwise violate its intellectual property and proprietary rights, and policing the unauthorized use of ChargePoint’s intellectual property and proprietary rights can be difficult. The enforcement of ChargePoint’s intellectual property and proprietary rights also depends on any legal actions ChargePoint may bring against any such parties being successful, but these actions are costly, time-consuming and may not be successful, even when ChargePoint’s rights have been infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated.
ChargePoint intends to continue to regularly assess opportunities for seeking patent protection for those aspects of its technology, designs and methodologies that ChargePoint believes provide a meaningful competitive advantage. However, ChargePoint’s ability to do so may be limited until such time as it is able to generate cash flow from operations or otherwise raise sufficient capital to continue to invest in ChargePoint’s intellectual property. For example, maintaining patents in the United States and other countries requires the payment of maintenance fees which, if ChargePoint is unable to pay, may result in loss of its patent rights. If ChargePoint is unable to
12

pay these maintenance fees, its ability to protect its intellectual property or prevent others from infringing its proprietary rights may be impaired.
Human Capital Resources
As of January 31, 2023, ChargePoint had over 1,650 worldwide employees. ChargePoint’s talent is the foundation of its success. ChargePoint strives to become the employer of choice within its industry, facilitating the transition to electric mobility by placing its talent at the heart of its success. To achieve this mission, ChargePoint aims to develop its individual, team and leadership capabilities, attract the best talent from diverse backgrounds, retain its talent through a variety of means including competitive rewards and benefits, creating a winning culture, and engaging its talent by building a culture of feedback, inclusion and recognition. Key focus and investment areas to achieve this goal include, among others, diversity and inclusion, emphasis on ethical business practices, and employee safety and wellness.
Diversity and Inclusion. ChargePoint believes that by cultivating a diverse and inclusive workforce where employees can bring diversity of thought, background and experiences, ChargePoint will ultimately drive better business outcomes and drive value for the organization and customers. This commitment includes adopting policies and other initiatives designed to provide equal access to, and participation in, equal employment opportunities, programs, and services without regard to race, religion, color, national origin, disability, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity. ChargePoint’s Compensation and Organizational Development Committee of its Board of Directors reviews and provides feedback on ChargePoint’s diversity and inclusion initiatives.
Ethical Business Practices. ChargePoint also fosters a strong corporate culture that promotes high standards of ethics and compliance for its business, including policies that set forth principles to guide employees, executives, and directors, such as its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. In addition, ChargePoint has joined the future management may not haveResponsible Business Alliance (RBA) and adopted its Supplier Code of Conduct, which emphasizes business ethics in its supply chain through audit and oversight programs focused on promoting ethical and sustainable labor, health and safety, and environmental business practices. ChargePoint also maintains a whistleblower policy and anonymous hotline for the necessary skills, qualificationsconfidential reporting of any suspected policy violations or abilitiesunethical business conduct on the part of its businesses, employees, executives, directors, or vendors.
Employee Safety and Wellness. ChargePoint provides various health and wellness resources to managehelp its employees maintain and improve their well-being. In addition to health, medical and dental benefits, ChargePoint offers all employees access to several wellness offerings which provide a public company. Furthermore, the future rolevariety of members of our management team, if any,mental and physical health solutions, therapy and coaching sessions, fertility, family forming and pregnancy support, virtual baby care, and mobile access to doctors.
Compensation and Benefits. ChargePoint offers competitive salaries and benefits programs such as medical, dental, and vision insurance, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, a 401(k) plan, health savings account, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, short-term and long-term disability insurance, and commuter benefits. Employees are also eligible to participate in the target business cannot presentlyits Employee Stock Purchase Program and discretionary equity awards program. ChargePoint designs its employee benefits programs to be stated with any certainty. The determination as to whether any of the members of our management team will remain with the combined company will be made at the time of our initial business combination. While it is possible that one or more of our directors will remain associatedcompetitive in some capacity with us following our business combination, it is unlikely that any of them will devote their full efforts to our affairs subsequent to our business combination. Moreover, we cannot assure you that members of our management team will have significant experience or knowledge relatingrelation to the operationsmarket. ChargePoint adjusts its employee benefits programs as needed to retain key talent based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices and the particular target business.

We cannot assure youcompetitive market. In structuring these benefit programs, ChargePoint seeks to provide an aggregate level of benefits that any of our key personnel will remain in senior managementare comparable to those provided by similar companies.

Available Information
The Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or advisory positions with the combined company. The determination as to whether any of our key personnel will remain with the combined company will be made at the time of our initial business combination.

Following a business combination, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of the target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.


Stockholders May Not Have the Ability to Approve our Initial Business Combination

We may conduct redemptions without a stockholder votefurnished pursuant to the tender offer rulesSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SEC, subject to the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. However, we will seek stockholder approval if it is required by law or applicable stock exchange rule, or we may decide to seek stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons. Presented in the table below is a graphic explanation of the types of initial business combinations we may consider and whether stockholder approval is currently required under Delaware law for each such transaction.

Type of TransactionWhether Stockholder Approval is Required
Purchase of assetsNo
Purchase of stock of target not involving a merger with the companyNo
Merger of target into a subsidiary of the companyNo
Merger of the company with a targetYes

Under the NYSE’s listing rules, stockholder approval would be required for our initial business combination if, for example:

we issue shares of Class A common stock that will be equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of shares of our Class A common stock then outstanding (other than in a public offering);

any of our directors, officers or substantial security holders (as defined by the NYSE rules) has a 5% or greater interest, directly or indirectly, in the target business or assets to be acquired and if the number of shares of common stock to be issued, or if the number of shares of common stock into which the securities may be convertible or exercisable, exceeds either (a) 1% of the number of shares of common stock or 1% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance in the case of any of our directors or officers (b) 5% of the number of shares of common stock or 5% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance in the case of any substantial security holders; or

the issuance or potential issuance of common stock will result in our undergoing a change of control.

Permitted Purchases of our Securities

In the event we seek stockholder approval of our business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase shares or Warrants in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our initial business combination. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the Trust Account will be used to purchase shares or Warrants in such transactions. If they engage in such transactions, they will not make any such purchases when they are in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or if such purchases are prohibited by Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such a purchase may include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of our shares is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights.

In the event that our Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. We do not currently anticipate that such purchases, if any, would constitute a tender offer subject to the tender offer rules under the Exchange Act or a going-private transaction subject to the going-private rules under the Exchange Act; however, if the purchasers determine at the time of any such purchases that the purchases are subject to such rules, the purchasers will comply with such rules.

The purpose of any such purchases of shares could be to (i) vote such shares in favor of the business combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the business combination or (ii) to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The purpose of any such purchases of Warrants could be to reduce the number of Warrants outstanding or to vote such Warrants on any matters submitted to the warrantholders for approval in connection with our initial business combination. Any such purchases of our securities may result in the completion of our business combination that may not otherwise have been possible.


In addition, if such purchases, are made the public “float”available free of our common stock or Warrants may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securitiescharge on a national securities exchange.

Our Sponsor, officers, directors and/or their affiliates anticipate that they may identify the stockholders with whom our Sponsor, officers, directors or their affiliates may pursue privately negotiated purchases by either the stockholders contacting us directly or by our receipt of redemption requests submitted by stockholders (in the case of shares of Class A common stock) following our mailing of proxy materials in connection with our initial business combination. To the extent that our Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates enter into a private purchase, they would identify and contact only potential selling stockholders who have expressed their election to redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the Trust Account or vote against our initial business combination, whether or not such stockholder has already submitted a proxy with respect to our initial business combination but only if such shares have not already been voted at the stockholder meeting related to our initial business combination. Our Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or any of their affiliates will select which stockholders to purchase shares from based on the negotiated price and number of shares and any other factors that they may deem relevant, and will only purchase shares if such purchases comply with Regulation M under the Exchange Act and the other federal securities laws.

Any purchases by our Sponsor, officers, directors and/or their affiliates who are affiliated purchasers under Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act will only be made to the extent such purchases are able to be made in compliance with Rule 10b-18, which is a safe harbor from liability for manipulation under Section 9(a)(2) of and Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act. Rule 10b-18 has certain technical requirements that must be complied with in order for the safe harbor to be available to the purchaser. Our Sponsor, officers, directors and/or their affiliates will not make purchases of common stock if the purchases would violate Section 9(a)(2) of or Rule 10b-5 under the Exchange Act. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent such purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements.

Redemption Rights for Public Stockholders upon Completion of our Initial Business Combination

We will provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their shares of Class A common stock upon the completion of our initial business combination at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account calculated as of two business days prior to the consummation of the initial business combination including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, subject to the limitations described herein. The per-share amount that we will distribute to investors who properly redeem their shares will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting discounts and commissions we will pay to the underwriters of the Public Offering. Our Sponsor, officers and directors have entered into a letter agreement with us, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares held by them and any public shares held by them in connection with the completion of our business combination.

Limitations on Redemptions

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). However, the proposed business combination may require (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or its owners, (ii) cash to be transferred to the target for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions in accordance with the terms of the proposed business combination. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to pay for all shares of Class A common stock that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed business combination exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will not complete the business combination or redeem any shares, and all shares of Class A common stock submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof.


Manner of Conducting Redemptions

We will provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their shares of Class A common stock upon the completion of our initial business combination either (i) in connection with a stockholder meeting called to approve the business combination or (ii) by means of a tender offer. The decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination or conduct a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would require us to seek stockholder approval under applicable law or stock exchange listing requirement. Asset acquisitions and stock purchases would not typically require stockholder approval, while direct mergers with the Company where we do not survive and any transactions where we issue more than 20% of our outstanding common stock or seek to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation would require stockholder approval. If we structure a business combination transaction with a target business in a manner that requires stockholder approval, we will not have discretion as to whether to seek a stockholder vote to approve the proposed business combination. We currently intend to conduct redemptions in connection with a stockholder vote unless stockholder approval is not required by applicable law or stock exchange listing requirement and we choose to conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC for business or other legal reasons.

If we hold a stockholder vote to approve our initial business combination, we will, pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation:

conduct the redemptions in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies, and not pursuant to the tender offer rules, and

file proxy materials with the SEC.

In the event that we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, we will distribute proxy materials and, in connection therewith, provide our public stockholders with the redemption rights described above upon completion of the initial business combination.

If we seek stockholder approval, we will complete our initial business combination only if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the business combination. A quorum for such meeting will consist of the holders present in person or by proxy of shares of outstanding capital stock of the Company representing a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting. Our initial stockholders will count toward this quorum and have agreed to vote their Founder Shares and any public shares purchased during or after the Public Offering in favor of our initial business combination. These quorum and voting thresholds, and the voting agreements of our initial stockholders, may make it more likely that we will consummate our initial business combination. Each public stockholder may elect to redeem its public shares irrespective of whether it votes for or against the proposed transaction. In addition, our Sponsor, officers and directors have entered into a letter agreement with us, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares and any public shares held by them in connection with the completion of a business combination.

If we conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC, we will, pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation:

conduct the redemptions pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E under the Exchange Act, which regulate issuer tender offers, and

file tender offer documents with the SEC prior to completing our initial business combination which contain substantially the same financial and other information about the initial business combination and the redemption rights as is required under Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies.

Upon the public announcement of our business combination, we or our Sponsor will terminate any plan established in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act to purchase shares of our Class A common stock in the open market if we elect to redeem our public shares through a tender offer, to comply with Rule 14e-5 under the Exchange Act.

In the event we conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, our offer to redeem will remain open for at least 20 business days, in accordance with Rule 14e-1(a) under the Exchange Act, and we will not be permitted to complete our initial business combination until the expiration of the tender offer period. In addition, the tender offer will be conditioned on public stockholders not tendering more than the number of public shares we are permitted to redeem. If public stockholders tender more shares than we have offered to purchase, we will withdraw the tender offer and not complete the initial business combination.

Limitation on Redemption upon Completion of our Initial Business Combination if we Seek Stockholder Approval

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than an aggregate of 20% of the shares sold in our Public Offering, which we refer to as the “Excess Shares.” We believe this restriction will discourage stockholders from accumulating large blocks of shares, and subsequent attempts by such holders to use their ability to exercise their redemption rights against a proposed business combination as a means to force us or our management to purchase their shares at a significant premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable terms. Absent this provision, a public stockholder holding more than an aggregate of 20% of the shares sold in our Public Offering could threaten to exercise its redemption rights if such holder’s shares are not purchased by us, our Sponsor or our management at a premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable terms. By limiting our stockholders’ ability to redeem no more than 20% of the shares sold in our Public Offering without our prior consent, we believe we will limit the ability of a small group of stockholders to unreasonably attempt to block our ability to complete our business combination, particularly in connection with a business combination with a target that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. However, we would not be restricting our stockholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our business combination.

Redemption of Public Shares and Liquidation if no Initial Business Combination

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we have 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering to complete our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our business combination within such 24-month period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. There will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions with respect to our warrants, which will expire worthless if we fail to complete our business combination within the 24-month time period.

Our Sponsor, officers and directors have entered into a letter agreement with us, pursuant to which they have waived their rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any Founder Shares held by them if we fail to complete our initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering. However, our Sponsor, officers or directors will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any public shares that they acquired in or after our Public Offering if we fail to complete our initial business combination within the allotted 24-month time period.


Our Sponsor, officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering, unless we provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of Class A common stock upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares. However, we may not redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). If this optional redemption right is exercised with respect to an excessive number of public shares such that we cannot satisfy the net tangible asset requirement, we would not proceed with the amendment or the related redemption of our public shares at such time. Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, such an amendment would need to be approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 65% of all then outstanding shares of our common stock.

We expect that all costs and expenses associated with implementing our plan of dissolution, as well as payments to any creditors, will be funded from amounts held outside the Trust Account, although we cannot assure you that there will be sufficient funds for such purpose. However, if those funds are not sufficient to cover the costs and expenses associated with implementing our plan of dissolution, to the extent that there is any interest accrued in the Trust Account not required to pay franchise and income taxes on interest income earned on the Trust Account balance, we may request the Trustee to release to us an additional amount of up to $100,000 of such accrued interest to pay those costs and expenses.

The proceeds deposited in the Trust Account could become subject to the claims of our creditors, which would have higher priority than the claims of our public stockholders. Under Section 281(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), our plan of dissolution must provide for all claims against us to be paid in full or make provision for payments to be made in full, as applicable, if there are sufficient assets. These claims must be paid or provided for before we make any distribution of our remaining assets to our stockholders. While we intend to pay such amounts, if any, we cannot assure you that we will have funds sufficient to pay or provide for all creditors’ claims.

Although we will seek to have all vendors (except for our independent registered public accounting firm), service providers, prospective target businesses and other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account for the benefit of our public stockholders, there is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements or even if they execute such agreements that they would be prevented from bringing claims against the Trust Account including but not limited to fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain an advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the Trust Account. If any third-party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the Trust Account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative. Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third-party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason. Our Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party (other than our independent public accountants) for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we have entered into a letter of intent, confidentiality or other similar agreement or business combination agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the Trust Account to below (i) $10.00 per public share or (ii) such lesser amount per public share held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, due to reductions in value of the trust assets, in each case net of the amount of interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes, except as to any claims by a third party or prospective target business who executed a waiver of any and all rights to the monies held in the Trust Account (whether or not such waiver is enforceable) and except as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of our Public Offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. However, we have not asked our Sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our Sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our Sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. None of our officers or directors will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims by vendors and prospective target businesses.


In the event that the proceeds in the Trust Account are reduced below (i) $10.00 per public share or (ii) such lesser amount per public share held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, due to reductions in value of the trust assets, in each case net of the amount of interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes, and our Sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its indemnification obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment may choose not to do so if, for example, the cost of such legal action is deemed by the independent directors to be too high relative to the amount recoverable or if the independent directors determine that a favorable outcome is not likely. We have not asked our Sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations and we cannot assure you that our Sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations.

We will seek to reduce the possibility that our Sponsor will have to indemnify the Trust Account due to claims of creditors by endeavoring to have all vendors, service providers (except for our independent registered public accounting firm), prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to monies held in the Trust Account. Our Sponsor will also not be liable as to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of our Public Offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. The pro rata portion of our Trust Account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not complete our business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering may be considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law. If the corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution.

Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of the Trust Account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not complete our business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering is not considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidating distribution. If we are unable to complete our business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. Accordingly, it is our intention to redeem our public sharesChargePoint’s website, investors.chargepoint.com as soon as reasonably possible following our 24th month and, therefore, we do not intend to complypracticable after they are electronically filed with those procedures. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claimsor furnished to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more)Securities and any liability of our stockholders may extend well beyondExchange Commission (“SEC”).In addition, the third anniversary of such date.


Because we will not be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such timeSEC maintains an internet site that will provide for our payment of all existingcontains reports, proxy and pending claims or claimsinformation statements, and other information regarding issuers that may be potentially brought against us within the subsequent ten years. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations will be limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) or prospective target businesses. As described above, pursuant to the obligation contained in our underwriting agreement, we will seek to have all vendors, service providers (except for our independent registered public accounting firm), prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account.

If we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. Additionally, if we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our stockholders. Furthermore, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and the Company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. We cannot assure you that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons.

Our public stockholders will be entitled to receive funds from the Trust Account only (i) in the event of the redemption of our public shares if we are unable to complete our business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering, subject to applicable law, (ii) in connection with a stockholder vote to approve an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering or (iii) if they redeem their respective shares for cash upon the completion of the initial business combination. In no other circumstances will a stockholder have any right or interest of any kind to or in the Trust Account. In the event we seek stockholder approval in connection with our initial business combination, a stockholder’s voting in connectionelectronically with the business combination alone will not result in a stockholder’s redeeming its shares to us for an applicable pro rata share of the Trust Account. Such stockholder must have also exercised its redemption rights described above. These provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, like all provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, may be amended with a stockholder vote.

Limited Payments to Insiders

There will be no finder’s fees, reimbursements or cash payments made by the Company to our Sponsor, officers or directors, or our or their affiliates, for services rendered to us prior to or in connection with the completion of our initial business combination, other than the following payments, none of which will be made from the proceeds of our Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants held in the Trust Account prior to the completion of our initial business combination:

repayment of up to an aggregate of $300,000 in loans made to us by our Sponsor to cover offering-related and organizational expenses;

reimbursement for office space, utilities, secretarial support and administrative services provided to us by our Sponsor, in an amount equal to $10,000 per month;

reimbursement for any out-of-pocket expenses related to identifying, investigating, negotiating and completing an initial business combination; and

repayment of loans made by our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor or certain of our officers and directors to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants of the post business combination entity at a price of $1.50 per warrant at the option of the lender. The warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants, including as to exercise price, exercisability and exercise period.

Competition

In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business for our business combination, we may encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including other blank check companies, private equity groups and leveraged buyout funds, and operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates. Moreover, many of these competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than we do. Our ability to acquire larger target businesses will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target business. Furthermore, our obligation to pay cash in connection with our public stockholders who exercise their redemption rights may reduce the resources available to us for our initial business combination and our outstanding warrants, and the future dilution they potentially represent, may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses. Either of these factors may place usSEC at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating an initial business combination.

Employees

We currently have three officers. These individuals are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters but they intend to devote as much of their time as they deem necessary to our affairs until we have completed our initial business combination. The amount of time that they will devote in any time period will vary based on whether a target business has been selected for our initial business combination and the stage of the business combination process we are in.

Periodic Reporting and Financial Information

We have registered our Units, Class A common stock and Warrants under the Exchange Act and have reporting obligations, including the requirement that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, our annual reports will contain financial statements audited and reported on by our independent registered public accountants.

We will provide stockholders with audited financial statements of the prospective target business as part of the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials (as applicable) sent to stockholders. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), or reconciled to, GAAP, or International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), depending on the circumstances, and the historical financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”). These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame. We cannot assure you that any particular target business identified by us as a potential acquisition candidate will have financial statements prepared in accordance with the requirements outlined above, or that the potential target business will be able to prepare its financial statements in accordance with the requirements outlined above. To the extent that any applicable requirements cannot be met, we may not be able to acquire the proposed target business. While this may limit the pool of potential acquisition candidates, we do not believe that this limitation will be material.

www.sec.gov.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

An investment in ourChargePoint’s securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully all ofconsider the risks described below together withbefore making an investment decision. ChargePoint’s business, prospects, financial condition, or operating results could be harmed by any of these risks, as well as other risks not known to ChargePoint or that it considers immaterial as of the other information contained indate of this Annual Reportannual report on Form 10-K including our financial statements and related notes, before making a decision to invest in our securities. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected. In that event, the(the “Annual Report”). The trading price of ourChargePoint’s securities could decline due to any of these risks, and, as a result, you couldmay lose all or part of your investment.

We are

13

Summary of Principal Risks Associated with ChargePoint’s Business
ChargePoint operates in the early-stage market of electric vehicle (“EV”) adoption and has a recently formed company with nohistory of losses, and expects to incur significant expenses and continuing losses for the near term.
ChargePoint has experienced rapid growth and expects to invest in growth for the foreseeable future. If it fails to manage growth effectively, its business, operating historyresults and no revenues (other than interest earnedfinancial condition could be adversely affected.
ChargePoint currently faces competition from a number of companies, particularly in Europe, and expects to face significant competition in the future as the market for EV charging develops.
ChargePoint relies on a third-party channel partner network of distributors and resellers to generate a substantial amount of its revenue, and failure on the funds held in the Trust Account),part of ChargePoint to continue to develop and youexpand this network may have no basisan adverse impact on whichits business and prospects for growth.
Failure to evaluate oureffectively expand ChargePoint’s sales and marketing capabilities could harm its ability to increase its customer base and achieve our business objective.

We are a recently formed company with no operating results. Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon whichbroader market acceptance of its solutions.

Supply chain disruptions, component shortages, manufacturing interruptions or delays, or the failure to evaluate ouraccurately forecast customer demand, could adversely affect ChargePoint’s ability to achieve ourmeet customer demand, lead to higher costs, and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business objectiveand results of completing our initial business combination with one or more target businesses. We may be unable to complete our business combination. If we fail to complete our business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.

Our public stockholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed business combination, which means we may complete our initial business combination even though a majority of our public stockholders do not support such a combination.

We may choose not to hold a stockholder vote to approve our initial business combination if the business combination would not require stockholder approval under applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements. Except as required by applicable law or stock exchange requirement, the decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination or will allow stockholders to sell their shares to us in a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek stockholder approval. Accordingly, we may complete our initial business combination even if holders of a majority of our public shares do not approve of the business combination we complete. Please refer to “Part I, Item 1. Business — Stockholders May Not Have the Ability to Approve Our Initial Business Combination” for additional information.


Your only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limitedoperations. For example, supply chain challenges related to the exerciseCOVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of your right to redeem your shares from us for cash.

Since our board of directorsUkraine and global chip shortages have impacted companies worldwide and may complete a business combination without seeking stockholder approval, public stockholders may not have the right or opportunity to voteadverse effects on the business combination, unless we seek such stockholder approval. Accordingly, if we do not seek stockholder approval, your only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to exercising your redemption rights within the period of time (which will be at least 20 business days) set forth in our tender offer documents mailed to our public stockholders in which we describe our initial business combination.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, our initial stockholdersChargePoint’s suppliers and management team have agreed to vote in favor of such initial business combination, regardless of how our public stockholders vote.

Our initial stockholders own 20.3% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Our initial stockholders and management team also may from time to time purchase shares of Class A common stock prior to our initial business combination. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, if we seek stockholder approval of an initial business combination, such initial business combination will be approved if we receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares voted at such meeting, including the Founder Shares. Accordingly, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, the agreement by our initial stockholders and management team to vote in favor of our initial business combination will increase the likelihood that we will receive the requisite stockholder approval for such initial business combination.

The ability of our public stockholders to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to potential business combination targets, which may make it difficult for us to enter into a business combination with a target.

We may seek to enter into a business combination transaction agreement with a prospective target that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. If too many public stockholders exercise their redemption rights, we would not be able to meet such closing conditioncustomers and, as a result, ChargePoint.

ChargePoint relies on a limited number of suppliers and manufacturers for its charging stations. A loss of any of these partners could negatively affect its business.
ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with construction, cost overruns and delays, and other contingencies that may arise in the course of completing installations, and such risks may increase in the future as ChargePoint expands the scope of such services with other parties.
Acquisitions or strategic investments could be difficult to identify and integrate, divert the attention of key management personnel, disrupt ChargePoint’s business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition.
If ChargePoint is unable to attract and retain key employees and hire qualified management, technical engineering and sales personnel, its ability to compete and successfully grow its business would be harmed.
ChargePoint is expanding operations internationally, particularly in Europe, which will expose it to additional tax, compliance, market and other risks.
Some members of ChargePoint’s management have limited experience in operating a public company.
ChargePoint’s future revenue growth will depend in significant part on its ability to increase sales of its products and services to fleet operators.
ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics which could have a material and adverse effect on its business and results of operations.
Future sales of ChargePoint’s common stock (“Common Stock”) in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could reduce ChargePoint’s stock price, and any conversions of its unsecured Convertible Senior PIK Toggle Notes (the “2027 Convertible Notes”) will, and any additional capital raised through the sale of equity or any future convertible securities ChargePoint may issue could, dilute existing stockholders’ ownership.
ChargePoint may need to raise additional funds and these funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on terms that are favorable to ChargePoint.
ChargePoint has incurred substantial indebtedness that may decrease its business flexibility, access to capital, and/or increase its borrowing costs, and ChargePoint may still incur substantially more debt, which may adversely affect its operations and financial results.
ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers, any of which systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.
14

Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking, phishing attacks and similar disruptions could result in security and privacy breaches and interruption in service, which could harm ChargePoint’s business.
ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with natural disasters and the adverse effects associated with climate change, including earthquakes, wildfires, or other types of natural disasters or resource shortages, including public safety power shut-offs that have occurred and may continue to occur in California, the effects of which could disrupt and harm its operations and those of ChargePoint’s customers.
Concentration of ownership among ChargePoint’s existing executive officers, directors and their affiliates may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.
ChargePoint has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
The price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock may be subject to wide fluctuations.
ChargePoint’s future growth and success is highly correlated with and thus dependent upon the continuing rapid adoption of EVs for passenger and fleet applications.
The EV market currently benefits from the availability of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives from governments, utilities and others to offset the purchase or operating costs of EVs and EV charging stations. In particular, ChargePoint’s marketing efforts have historically promoted federal tax credits available to purchasers of its EV charging stations that effectively provide purchasers with a significantly discounted purchase price. The reduction, modification, or elimination of such benefits could cause reduced demand for EVs and EV charging stations, which would adversely affect ChargePoint’s financial results.
ChargePoint’s business may be adversely affected if it is unable to protect its technology and intellectual property from unauthorized use by third parties.
ChargePoint has identified, and has previously identified, material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint is unable to remediate these material weaknesses, or if ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations.
Risks Related to ChargePoint’s Business
ChargePoint operates in the early-stage market of EV adoption and has a history of losses, and expects to incur significant expenses and continuing losses for the near term.
ChargePoint incurred net losses of $345.1 million, $132.2 million, and $197.0 million for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. As of January 31, 2023 and 2022, ChargePoint had an accumulated deficit of $1,156.8 million and $811.7 million, respectively. ChargePoint believes it will continue to incur significant operating expenses and net losses in future quarters for the near term. There can be no assurance that it will be able to proceed withachieve or maintain profitability in the future. ChargePoint’s potential profitability is particularly dependent upon the continued adoption of EVs by consumers and fleet operators and the widespread adoption of electric trucks, other vehicles and other electric transportation modalities, each of which are still in the very early stages of adoption and may not occur.
ChargePoint has experienced rapid growth and expects to invest in growth for the foreseeable future. If it fails to manage growth effectively, its business, combination. Furthermore,operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.
ChargePoint has experienced rapid growth in norecent periods. For example, the number of employees has grown from over 800 as of January 31, 2021 to over 1,400 as of January 31, 2022 and to over 1,650 as of January 31, 2023. The growth and expansion of its business has placed and continues to place a significant strain on management, operations, financial infrastructure and corporate culture. In the event will we redeem our public shares in an amountof further growth, ChargePoint’s information technology systems and ChargePoint’s internal control over financial reporting and procedures may not be adequate to support its operations and may introduce opportunities for data security incidents that would cause our net tangible assetsmay interrupt business operations and permit bad actors to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subjectobtain unauthorized access to business information or misappropriate funds. ChargePoint may also face risks to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). Consequently, if accepting all properly submitted redemption requests would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 orextent such greater amount necessary to satisfy a closing condition as described above, we would not proceed with such redemptionbad actors infiltrate the information technology infrastructure of its contractors.
To manage growth in operations and the related business combination and may instead search for an alternate business combination. Prospective targets will be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a business combination transaction with us.


The ability of our public stockholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares may not allow us to complete the most desirable business combination or optimize our capital structure.

At the time we enter into an agreement for our initial business combination, we will not know how many stockholders may exercise their redemption rights, and thereforepersonnel, ChargePoint will need to structurecontinue to improve its operational, financial and management controls and reporting systems and procedures. Failure to manage growth effectively could result in difficulty or delays in attracting new customers, declines in quality or customer satisfaction, increases in costs, difficulties in introducing new products and services or enhancing existing products and services, loss of customers, inability to retain or hire new employees effectively, information security vulnerabilities or other operational difficulties, any of which could adversely affect its business performance and operating results.

15

ChargePoint currently faces competition from a number of companies, particularly in Europe, and expects to face significant competition in the transaction basedfuture as the market for EV charging develops.
The EV charging market is relatively new and competition is still developing. ChargePoint primarily competes with smaller providers of EV charging station networks for installations, particularly in Europe. Large early-stage markets, such as Europe, require early engagement across verticals and customers to gain market share, and ongoing effort to scale channels, installers, teams and processes. Some European customers require solutions not yet available and ChargePoint’s recent entrance into Europe requires establishing itself against existing competitors. In addition, there are multiple competitors in Europe with limited funding, which could cause poor user experiences, hampering overall EV adoption or trust in any particular provider.
In addition, there are other means for charging EVs, which could affect the level of demand for onsite charging capabilities at businesses. For example, Tesla Inc. continues to build out its supercharger network across the United States for its vehicles and has opened its supercharger network up to non-Tesla EVs, which could reduce overall demand for EV charging at other sites, including ChargePoint’s. Also, third-party contractors can provide basic electric charging capabilities to potential customers seeking to have on our expectations aspremise EV charging capability or individual customers seeking home charging. In addition, many EV charging manufacturers, including ChargePoint, are offering home charging equipment, which could reduce demand for on premise charging capabilities of potential customers and reduce the demand for onsite charging capabilities if EV owners find charging at home to be sufficient.
Further, ChargePoint’s current or potential competitors may be acquired by third-parties with greater available resources. In addition, certain of ChargePoint’s competitors are engaging in or have completed transactions to become publicly traded companies and may have ready access to the numbercapital markets for additional funding. As a result, competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than ChargePoint to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements and may have the ability to initiate or withstand substantial price competition. In addition, competitors may in the future establish cooperative relationships with vendors of sharescomplementary products, technologies or services to increase the availability of their solutions in the marketplace. This competition may also materialize in the form of costly intellectual property disputes or litigation involving ChargePoint.
New competitors or alliances may emerge in the future that have greater market share, more widely adopted proprietary technologies, greater marketing expertise and greater financial resources, which could put ChargePoint at a competitive disadvantage. Future competitors could also be better positioned to serve certain segments of ChargePoint’s current or future target markets, which could create price pressure. In light of these factors, even if ChargePoint’s offerings are more effective and higher quality than those of its competitors, current or potential customers may accept competitive solutions. If ChargePoint fails to adapt to changing market conditions or continue to compete successfully with current charging providers or new competitors, its growth will be submitted for redemption. If ourlimited which would adversely affect its business combination agreement requires usand results of operations.
ChargePoint relies on a third-party channel partner network of distributors and resellers to usegenerate a portion of the cash in the Trust Account to pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimumsubstantial amount of cash at closing, we will needits revenue and failure on the part of ChargePoint to reserve a portion of the cashcontinue to develop and expand this network may have an adverse impact on its business and prospects for growth.
ChargePoint’s success is dependent in the Trust Account to meet such requirements, or arrange for third party financing. In addition, if a larger number of shares are submitted for redemption than we initially expected, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion of the cash in the Trust Account or arrange for third party financing. Raising additional third-party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable business combination available to us or optimize our capital structure. The amount of the deferred underwriting discountspart upon establishing and commissions payable to the underwriters will not be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed in connectionmaintaining relationships with a business combination. The per-share amount we will distributevariety of channel partners that it utilizes to stockholders who properly exercise their redemption rights will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting discountsextend its geographic reach and commissionsmarket penetration. ChargePoint uses a two-tiered, indirect fulfillment model whereby ChargePoint sells its products and after such redemptions, the amount heldservices to its distributors, which in trustturn sell to resellers, which then sell to end users. ChargePoint refers to these end users as customers. ChargePoint anticipates that it will continue to reflect our obligation to pay the entire deferred underwriting discounts and commissions.

The ability of our public stockholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could increase the probability that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful and that you would have to wait for liquidationrely on this two-tiered sales model in order to redeem your stock.

If ourhelp facilitate sales of ChargePoint’s products and to grow its business combination agreement requires usinternationally. In the fiscal years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, ChargePoint derived a majority of its billings from products and subscriptions sold through channel partners. ChargePoint’s agreements with its channel partners are non-exclusive and do not prohibit them from working with ChargePoint’s competitors or offering competing solutions, and some of ChargePoint’s channel partners may have more established relationships with ChargePoint’s competitors. Similarly, ChargePoint’s channel partners have no obligations to use a portionrenew their agreements with ChargePoint on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and certain of the cashagreements governing these relationships may be terminated by either party at any time, with no or limited notice. If ChargePoint’s channel partners choose to place greater emphasis on products of their own or those offered by ChargePoint’s competitors or a result of an acquisition, competitive factors or for other reasons do not continue to market and sell ChargePoint’s solutions in the Trust Account to pay the purchase price,an effective manner or requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, the probability that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful is increased. If our initial business combination is unsuccessful, you would not receive your pro rata portion of the Trust Account until we liquidate the Trust Account. If you are in need of immediate liquidity, you could attempt to sell your stock in the open market; however, at such time our stock may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount per share in the Trust Account. In either situation, you may suffer a material loss on your investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with our redemption until we liquidate or you are able to sell your stock in the open market.

The requirement that we complete our initial business combination within 24 months after the closing of our Public Offering may give potential target businesses leverage over us in negotiating a business combination and may limit the time we have to conduct due diligence on potential business combination targets as we approach our dissolution deadline, which could undermine ourall, ChargePoint’s ability to complete ourgrow its business combinationand sell its solutions may be adversely affected. In addition, ChargePoint’s failure to recruit additional channel partners, or any reduction or delay in their sales of ChargePoint solutions and subscriptions, including because of economic uncertainty, or due to conflicts between channel sales and ChargePoint’s direct sales force may harm ChargePoint’s results of operations. Finally, even if ChargePoint is successful in establishing and maintaining relationships with channel partners, these relationships may not result in greater customer usage of ChargePoint’s solutions and professional services or increased revenue.

Failure to effectively expand ChargePoint’s sales and marketing capabilities could harm its ability to increase its customer base and achieve broader market acceptance of its solutions.
ChargePoint’s ability to grow its customer base, achieve broader market acceptance, grow revenue, and achieve and sustain profitability will depend, to a significant extent, on terms that would produce value for our stockholders.

Any potential target business with which we enter into negotiations concerningits ability to effectively expand its sales and marketing operations and activities. Sales

16

and marketing expenses represent a business combinationsignificant percentage of ChargePoint’s total revenue, and its operating results will be aware that we must complete our initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering. Consequently, such target business may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a business combination, knowing thatsuffer if wesales and marketing expenditures do not complete our initial business combination with that particular target business, we may be unablecontribute significantly to complete our initial business combination with any target business. This risk will increase as we get closerincreasing revenue.
ChargePoint is substantially dependent on its channel partners and direct sales force to the timeframe described above. In addition, we may have limited timeobtain new customers. ChargePoint plans to conduct due diligencecontinue to expand its direct sales force both domestically and may enter into our initial business combination on terms that we would have rejected upon a more comprehensive investigation.

Weinternationally but it may not be able to complete ourrecruit and hire a sufficient number of sales personnel, which may adversely affect its ability to expand its sales capabilities. New hires require significant training and time before they achieve full productivity, particularly in new sales territories. Recent hires and planned hires may not become as productive as quickly as anticipated and ChargePoint may be unable to hire or retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals. Furthermore, hiring sales personnel in new countries can be costly, complex and time-consuming, and requires additional set up and upfront costs that may be disproportionate to the initial revenue expected from those countries. There is significant competition for direct sales personnel with strong sales skills and technical knowledge. ChargePoint’s ability to achieve significant revenue growth in the future will depend, in large part, on its success in recruiting, training, incentivizing and retaining a sufficient number of qualified direct sales personnel and on such personnel attaining desired productivity levels within a reasonable amount of time. ChargePoint’s business combination within 24 months afterwill be harmed if continuing investment in its sales and marketing capabilities does not generate a significant increase in revenue.

Supply chain disruptions, component shortages, manufacturing interruptions or delays, or the closingfailure to accurately forecast customer demand, could adversely affect ChargePoint’s ability to meet customer demand, lead to higher costs, and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of our Public Offering,operations. For example, supply chain challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and global chip shortages have impacted companies worldwide and may have adverse effects on ChargePoint’s suppliers and customers and, as a result, ChargePoint.
ChargePoint depends on the timely supply of materials, services and related products to meet the demands of its customers, which depends in which case we would cease all operations exceptpart on the timely delivery of materials and services from suppliers and contract manufacturers. Significant or sudden increases in demand for EV charging stations, as well as worldwide demand for the purposeraw materials and services that ChargePoint requires to manufacture and sell EV charging stations, including component parts, may result in a shortage of winding upsuch materials or may cause shipment delays due to transportation interruptions or capacity constraints. Such shortages or delays could adversely impact ChargePoint’s suppliers’ ability to meet ChargePoint’s demand requirements.
Disruptions in the manufacturing, delivery and weoverall supply chain of vehicle manufacturers and suppliers, such as prolonged port congestion and intermittent supplier shutdowns and delays, each of which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, have resulted in additional costs and, to a lesser extent, component shortages, and have led to fluctuations in EV sales in markets around the world. Increased demand for personal electronics and trade restrictions that affect raw materials have contributed to a shortfall of semiconductor chips, which has caused additional supply challenges both within and outside of ChargePoint’s industry. Ongoing supply chain challenges, component shortages and heightened logistics costs have adversely affected ChargePoint’s gross margins in recent quarters and ChargePoint expects that gross margins will continue to be adversely affected by increased material costs and freight and logistic expenses for the foreseeable future. Costs incurred to expedite delivery of components and replacement parts used in charging stations or in providing installation or maintenance services or to proactively increase inventory could cause ChargePoint to raise its prices, impose surcharges or other fees or refuse to negotiate discounts. Further, any sustained downturn in demand for EVs would redeem our public sharesalso harm ChargePoint’s business.
ChargePoint may also experience significant interruptions of its manufacturing operations, delays in its ability to deliver products, or increased costs as a result of:
the failure or inability to accurately forecast demand and liquidate.

Weobtain sufficient quantities of quality raw materials or replacement parts on a cost-effective basis;

volatility in the availability and cost of materials or services, including rising prices due to inflation;
shipment delays due to transportation interruptions or capacity constraints, such as reduced availability of air or ground transport or port closures;
information technology or infrastructure failures, including those of a third party supplier or service provider;
difficulties or delays in obtaining required import or export approvals;
natural disasters or other events beyond ChargePoint’s control (such as earthquakes, utility interruptions, tsunamis, hurricanes, typhoons, floods, storms or extreme weather conditions, fires, regional economic downturns, regional or global health epidemics, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic); and
geopolitical turmoil, including the ongoing invasion of Ukraine by Russia or increased trade restrictions between the United States, Russia, China and other countries, social unrest, political instability, terrorism, or other acts of war which may further adversely impact supply chains, shipping, transportation and logistics disruptions.
Further, the United States has imposed extraordinary tariffs and extensive export controls targeted primarily at the semiconductor industry in China. If China retaliates to such measures or there is a conflict between China and Taiwan, which is a leading producer of semiconductors, there could be further disruption to the semiconductor industry and global supply chains. ChargePoint or the suppliers it
17

procures components from may be unable to manufacture products at prices ChargePoint’s customers would accept, or at all. Any inability to pass on future increased costs to customers would put downward pressure on ChargePoint’s gross margins and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, while ChargePoint has not yet experienced a direct impact to its supply chain due to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, ChargePoint may experience an impact in the future due to increased fuel and shipping costs, limited supply of components or replacement parts used by ChargePoint in its manufacturing process, or the automotive industry in general, and delays caused by changes to global shipping routes and logistics. Such adverse impacts on ChargePoint’s supply chain could limit its ability to manufacture and sell its products on a timely and cost-effective basis and adversely affect its gross margins, which could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
ChargePoint relies on a limited number of suppliers and manufacturers for its charging stations. A loss of any of these partners could negatively affect its business.
ChargePoint relies on a limited number of suppliers to manufacture its charging stations, including in some cases only a single supplier for some products and components. This reliance on a limited number of manufacturers increases ChargePoint’s risks, since it does not currently have proven reliable alternatives or replacement manufacturers beyond these key parties. In the event of interruption, including or resulting in a sudden failure by a supplier to meet its obligation, ChargePoint may not be able to find a suitable targetincrease capacity from other sources or develop alternate or secondary sources without incurring material additional costs and substantial delays. Thus, ChargePoint’s business and complete our initial business combination within 24 months after the closingcould be adversely affected if one or more of our Public Offering. Our ability to complete our initial business combination may be negativelyits suppliers is impacted by general market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt markets and the other risks described herein. If we have not completed our initial business combination within such time period, we will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares,any interruption at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal toparticular location.
As the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Accountdemand for EV charging increases, ChargePoint’s suppliers and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and our board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.


If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination, our Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates may elect to purchase shares or Warrants from public stockholders or public warrantholders, which may influence a vote on a proposed business combination and reduce the public “float” of our Class A common stock.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase shares or Warrants or a combination thereof in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our initial business combination, although they are under no obligation to do so. However, other than as expressly stated herein, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the Trust Account will be used to purchase shares or Warrants in such transactions.

In the event that our Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public stockholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. The purpose of any such purchases of shares could be to vote such shares in favor of the business combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the business combination or to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The purpose of any such purchases of Warrants could be to reduce the number of Warrants outstanding or to vote such Warrants on any matters submitted to the warrantholders for approval in connection with our initial business combination. Any such purchases of our securities may result in the completion of our business combination that may not otherwise have been possible. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent the purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements. See “Part I, Item 1. Business — Permitted Purchases of our Securities” for a description of how our Sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or any of their affiliates will select which stockholders to purchase securities from in any private transaction.

In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our Class A common stock or Warrants and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, possibly making it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities exchange.

If a stockholder fails to receive notice of our offer to redeem our public shares in connection with our business combination, or fails to comply with the procedures for tendering its shares, such sharesmanufacturers may not be redeemed.

We will complyable to dedicate sufficient supply chain, production or sales channel capacity to keep up with the proxy rulesrequired pace of charging infrastructure expansion. By relying on contract manufacturing, ChargePoint is dependent upon the manufacturer, whose interests may be different from ChargePoint’s. For example, ChargePoint’s suppliers and contract manufacturers may have other customers with demand for the same components or tender offer rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connectionmanufacturing services and may allocate their resources based on the supplier’s or manufacturer’s interests or needs to maximize their revenue or relationships with our business combination. Despite our compliance with these rules, ifother customers rather than ChargePoint’s interest. As a stockholder fails to receive our proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, such stockholderresult, ChargePoint may not be able to assure itself that it will have sufficient control over the supply of key components, inventory or finished goods in a timely manner or with acceptable cost and expense, which may adversely affect ChargePoint’s revenue, cost of goods and gross margins.

If ChargePoint experiences a significant increase in demand for its charging stations in future periods, or if it needs to replace an existing supplier, it may not be possible to supplement or replace them on acceptable terms, which may undermine its ability to deliver products to customers in a timely manner. For example, it may take a significant amount of time to identify a manufacturer that has the capability and resources to build charging stations in sufficient volume. Identifying suitable suppliers and manufacturers could be an extensive process that requires ChargePoint to become awaresatisfied with such party’s quality control, technical capabilities, responsiveness and service, financial stability, regulatory compliance, and labor and other ethical practices. Accordingly, a loss of any significant suppliers or manufacturers could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, ChargePoint’s suppliers may face supply chain risks and constraints of their own, which may impact the availability and pricing of its products. For example, supply chain challenges related to global chip shortages have impacted companies worldwide both within and outside of ChargePoint’s industry and may continue to have adverse effects on ChargePoint’s suppliers and, as a result, ChargePoint.
In addition, in fiscal year 2023, ChargePoint became subject to requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) to diligence, disclose and report whether or not its products contain minerals originating from the Democratic Republic of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, the proxy solicitationCongo and adjoining countries, or tender offer materials, as applicable, that weconflict minerals. ChargePoint will furnish to holders of our public shares in connection with our initial business combination will describe the various procedures that must be complied with in order to validly redeem or tender public shares. For example, we may require our public stockholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street name,” to either tender their certificates to our transfer agent prior to the date set forth in the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials mailed to such holders, or up to two business days prior to the vote on the proposal to approve the business combination in the event we distribute proxy materials, or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent electronically. In the event that a stockholder failsincur additional costs to comply with these ordisclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any other procedures, its shares may not be redeemed.


You will not have any rights or interestsof the relevant minerals and metals used in funds fromChargePoint’s products. These requirements could adversely affect the Trust Account, except under certain limited circumstances. Therefore, to liquidate your investment, yousourcing, availability and pricing of minerals used in the components used in ChargePoint’s products. It is also possible that ChargePoint’s reputation may be forcedadversely affected if it determines that certain of its products contain minerals not determined to sell your public sharesbe conflict-free or Warrants, potentiallyif it is unable to alter its products, processes or sources of supply to avoid use of such materials. ChargePoint may also encounter end-customers who require that all of the components of the products be certified as conflict free. If ChargePoint is not able to meet this requirement, such end-customers may choose to purchase products from a different company.

ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with construction, cost overruns and delays, and other contingencies that may arise in the course of completing installations, and such risks may increase in the future as ChargePoint expands the scope of such services with other parties.
ChargePoint does not typically install charging stations at customer sites. These installations are typically performed by ChargePoint partners or electrical contractors with an existing relationship with the customer and/or knowledge of the site. The installation of charging stations at a loss.

Our public stockholders will be entitledparticular site is generally subject to receive funds fromoversight and regulation in accordance with state and local laws and ordinances relating to building codes, safety, environmental protection and related matters, and typically requires various local and other governmental approvals and permits that may vary by jurisdiction. In addition, building codes, accessibility requirements or regulations may hinder EV charger installation because they end up costing the Trust Account only upondeveloper or installer more in order to meet the earliestcode requirements. Meaningful delays or cost overruns may impact ChargePoint’s recognition of revenue in certain cases and/or impact customer relationships, either of which could impact ChargePoint’s business and profitability. In addition, the proper preparation, configuration and installation of charging stations requires specialized electrical certifications and skills. If ChargePoint is unable to occur of: (i)identify sufficient partners and contractors to satisfy its customers’ installation needs, specifically electricians and construction partners

18

with sufficient skill and expertise installing charging stations, it may delay deployment projects or cause its customers to delay making an investment or commitment to purchase charging stations, which may adversely affect ChargePoint’s business.
Furthermore, ChargePoint may in the redemptionfuture elect to install charging stations at customer sites or manage contractors, likely as part of any public shares properly submitted in connectionoffering customers a turnkey solution. Working with our completion ofcontractors may require ChargePoint to obtain licenses or require it or its customers to comply with additional rules, working conditions and other union requirements, which can add costs and complexity to an initial business combination (including the release of funds to pay any amounts due to any public stockholders who properly exercise their redemption rights in connection therewith), (ii) the redemption of any public shares properly submitted in connection with a stockholder vote to approve an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public sharesinstallation project. In addition, if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering, or (iii) the redemption of our public shares if wethese contractors are unable to complete an initial business combination within 24 months from the closingprovide timely, thorough and quality installation-related services, customers could fall behind their construction schedules leading to liability of our Public Offering, subjectChargePoint, or cause customers to applicable law and as further described herein. In addition, if we are unable to complete an initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering for any reason, compliance with Delaware law may require that we submit a plan of dissolution to our then-existing stockholders for approval prior to the distribution of the proceeds held in the Trust Account. In that case, public stockholders may be forced to wait beyond 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering before they receive funds from the Trust Account. In no other circumstances will a public stockholder have any right or interest of any kind in the Trust Account. Holders of Warrants will not have any right to the proceeds held in the Trust Account with respect to the Warrants. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your public shares or Warrants, potentially at a loss.

The NYSE may delist our securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.

We cannot assure you that our securities will continue to be listed on the NYSE in the future or prior to our initial business combination. In order to continue listing our securities on the NYSE prior to our initial business combination, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and stock price levels. Generally, we must maintain a minimum market capitalization ($50 million in the aggregate and $40 million of publicly-held shares) and a minimum number of holders of our securities (300 public holders).

Additionally, in connection with our initial business combination, we will be required to demonstrate compliancebecome dissatisfied with the NYSE’s initial listing requirements, which are more rigorous than the NYSE’s continued listing requirements, in order to continue to maintain the listing of our securities on the NYSE. We cannot assure you that we willsolutions ChargePoint offers and ChargePoint’s overall reputation would be able to meet those initial listing requirements at that time.

If the NYSE delists our securities from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securitiesharmed.

Acquisitions or strategic investments could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this weredifficult to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;

reduced liquidity for our securities;

a determination that our Class A common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our Class A common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;

a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and

a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.

The National Securities Markets Improvement Actidentify and integrate, divert the attention of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” Because our Units, Class A common stockkey management personnel, disrupt ChargePoint’s business, dilute stockholder value and Warrants are listed on the NYSE, our Units, Class A common stock and Warrants qualify are covered securities. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. While we are not aware of a state having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, other than the State of Idaho, certain state securities regulators view blank check companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies in their states. Further, if we were no longer listed on the NYSE, our securities would not be covered securities and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.

You will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.

Because we have net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,000 and timely filed a Current Report on Form 8-K after the Closing Date, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect investors in blank check companies, such as Rule 419 under the Securities Act (“Rule 419”). Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or protections of those rules. Among other things, this means we will have a longer period of time to complete our business combination than do companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, if we were subject to Rule 419, that rule would prohibit the release of any interest earned on funds held in the Trust Account to us unless and until the funds in the Trust Account were released to us in connection with our completion of an initial business combination.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, and if you or a “group” of stockholders are deemed to hold in excess of 20% of our Class A common stock, you will lose the ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 20% of our Class A common stock.

If we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than an aggregate of 20% of the public shares without our prior consent, which we refer to as the “Excess Shares.” However, we would not be restricting our stockholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our business combination. Your inability to redeem the Excess Shares will reduce your influence over our ability to complete our business combination and you could suffer a material loss on your investment in us if you sell Excess Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, you will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares if we complete our business combination. As a result, you will continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 20% and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be required to sell your stock in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.

Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete our initial business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to public stockholders, and our Warrants will expire worthless.

We expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals or investment partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting, directly or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources or more local industry knowledge than we do and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous target businesses we could potentially acquire with the net proceeds of our Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition of certain target businesses that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses. Furthermore, we are obligated to offer holders of our public shares the right to redeem their shares for cash at the time of our initial business combination, in conjunction with a stockholder vote or via a tender offer. Target businesses will be aware that this may reduce the resources available to us for our initial business combination. Any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to public stockholders, and our Warrants will expire worthless.


If the net proceeds of our Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants not being held in the Trust Account are insufficient to allow us to operate for at least 24 months after the Closing Date, we may be unable to complete our initial business combination, in which case our public stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share, or less than such amount in certain circumstances, and our Warrants will expire worthless.

The funds available to us outside of the Trust Account may not be sufficient to allow us to operate for at least 24 months after the Closing Date, assuming that our initial business combination is not completed during that time. We could use a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees to consultants to assist us with our search for a target business. We could also use a portion of the funds as a down payment or to fund a “no-shop” provision (a provision in letters of intent or merger agreements designed to keep target businesses from “shopping” around for transactions with other companies on terms more favorable to such target businesses) with respect to a particular proposed business combination, although we do not have any current intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent or merger agreement where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a target business and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds (whether as a result of our breach or otherwise), we might not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with respect to, a target business.

Subsequent to our completion of our initial business combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition,adversely affect its results of operations and our stock price,financial condition.

As part of ChargePoint’s business strategy, ChargePoint has made and continues to consider making acquisitions of, or investments in, businesses, services or technologies that are complementary to its existing business. For example, on August 11, 2021, ChargePoint acquired ViriCiti B.V. (“ViriCiti”), a provider of electrification solutions for eBus and commercial fleets, and on October 6, 2021, ChargePoint acquired has•to•be gmbh (“HTB”), an e-mobility and charging software platform. The process of identifying and consummating acquisitions and investments and the subsequent integration of new assets and businesses into ChargePoint’s own business, requires attention from management and could result in a diversion of resources from its existing business, which in turn could have an adverse effect on its operations. Acquired assets or businesses may not generate the expected financial results. Acquisitions or investments could also result in the use of cash, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the occurrence of goodwill impairment charges, amortization expenses for other intangible assets and exposure to potential unknown liabilities of the acquired business or investment. ChargePoint may also incur costs and management time on transactions that are ultimately not completed. In addition, ChargePoint’s due diligence may fail to identify all of the problems, liabilities or other shortcomings or challenges of an acquired business, product, technology or investment, including issues related to intellectual property, product quality or product architecture, regulatory compliance practices, revenue recognition or other accounting practices or issues with employees or customers.
ChargePoint’s acquisitions or investments may not ultimately strengthen its competitive position or achieve its goals and business strategy; ChargePoint may be subject to claims or liabilities assumed from an acquired company, product or technology; acquisitions or investments ChargePoint completes could be viewed negatively by its customers, investors and securities analysts; and ChargePoint may incur costs and expenses necessary to address an acquired company’s failure to comply with laws and governmental rules and regulations. Additionally, ChargePoint may be subject to litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, former stockholders or other third parties, which may differ from or be more significant than the risks ChargePoint’s business faces of similar litigation or other claims. An acquired company may also need to implement or improve its controls, procedures and policies, and ChargePoint may face risks associated if any of those controls, procedures or policies are insufficiently effective. ChargePoint may also face retention or cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into its organization. If ChargePoint is unsuccessful at integrating acquisitions or investments in a timely manner, the revenue and operating results of the combined company could be adversely affected. Any integration process may require significant time and resources, which may disrupt ChargePoint’s ongoing business and divert management’s attention, and ChargePoint may not be able to manage the integration process successfully or in a timely manner. ChargePoint may not successfully evaluate or utilize the acquired technology or personnel, realize anticipated synergies from the acquisition or investment, or accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition or investment transaction or the related integration of such acquisition or investment, including accounting charges and any potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets recognized in connection with such transaction. ChargePoint may have to pay cash, incur debt, or issue equity or equity-linked securities to pay for any acquisitions or investments, each of which could cause youadversely affect its financial condition or the market price of its Common Stock. Furthermore, the sale of equity or issuance of equity-linked debt to lose somefinance any such transaction could result in dilution to ChargePoint’s stockholders. The occurrence of any of these risks could harm ChargePoint’s business, operating results and financial condition.
If ChargePoint is unable to attract and retain key employees and hire qualified management, technical, engineering and sales personnel, its ability to compete and successfully grow its business would be harmed.
ChargePoint’s success depends, in part, on its continuing ability to identify, hire, attract, train and develop and retain highly qualified personnel. The inability to do so effectively would adversely affect its business. For example, in fiscal year 2023, ChargePoint’s Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Technology Officer resigned and ChargePoint hired a new Chief Operating Officer. ChargePoint’s future performance depends on the continued services and continuing contributions of its senior management to execute on its business plan and to identify and pursue new opportunities and product innovations. The loss of services of senior management, or allthe ineffective management of your investment.

Even if we conduct due diligenceany leadership transitions, especially within ChargePoint’s sales organization, could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of its development and strategic objectives, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition and operating results.

Competition for employees can be intense, particularly in Silicon Valley where ChargePoint is headquartered, and the ability to attract, hire and retain them depends on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence will surface all material issuesChargePoint’s ability to provide competitive compensation. In addition, job market dynamics have been impacted by the “great resignation,” with a particular targetsignificant number of people leaving the workforce, and future challenges related to ChargePoint’s “return-to-office” plans, hybrid work model or workplace practices could lead to attrition and difficulty attracting high-quality employees. ChargePoint may not be able to attract, assimilate, develop or retain qualified personnel in the future, and failure to do so could adversely affect its business, thatincluding the execution of its global business strategy.
19

ChargePoint is expanding operations internationally, particularly in Europe, which will expose it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amountadditional tax, compliance, market and other risks.
ChargePoint’s primary operations are in the United States and it maintains contractual relationships with parts and manufacturing suppliers in the Asia-Pacific region, Mexico and other locations. Also, ChargePoint is continuing to invest to increase its presence in Europe, including by its acquisitions of due diligence, or that factorsViriCiti and HTB, and to expand primarily research and development teams in Gurgaon, India, Reading, England and Radstadt, Austria. Managing these expansions requires additional resources and controls, and could subject ChargePoint to risks associated with international operations, including:
cost of alternative power sources, which could vary meaningfully outside the United States;
conformity with applicable business customs, including translation into foreign languages and associated expenses;
lack of availability of government incentives and subsidies;
challenges in arranging, and availability of, financing for customers;
potential changes to its established business model;
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations in an environment of diverse culture, laws, and customers, and the increased travel, infrastructure, and legal and compliance costs associated with international operations;
installation challenges;
differing driving habits and transportation modalities in other markets;
different levels of demand among commercial, fleet and residential customers;
compliance with multiple, potentially conflicting and changing governmental laws, regulations, certifications, and permitting processes including environmental, banking, employment, tax, information security, privacy, and data protection laws and regulations such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) and newer state privacy laws in the United States, the European Union (the “EU”) General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), national legislation implementing the same, the United Kingdom Data Protection Act 2018 (“UK GDPR”), and certain other changing requirements for legally transferring data out of the target businessEuropean Economic Area;
compliance with U.S. and outsideforeign anti-bribery laws including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and the U.K. Anti-Bribery Act of our control will not later arise. 2020 (the “Anti-Bribery Act”);
conforming products to various international regulatory and safety requirements as well as charging and other electric infrastructures;
difficulty in establishing, staffing and managing foreign operations;
difficulties in collecting payments in foreign currencies and associated foreign currency exposure;
restrictions on repatriation of earnings;
compliance with potentially conflicting and changing laws of taxing jurisdictions and compliance with applicable U.S. tax laws as they relate to international operations, the complexity and adverse consequences of such tax laws, and potentially adverse tax consequences due to changes in such tax laws; and
regional economic and political conditions, including the outbreak of war or other hostilities.
As a result of these factors, werisks, ChargePoint’s current expansion efforts and any potential future international expansion efforts may not be successful.
Some members of ChargePoint’s management have limited experience in operating a public company.
Some of ChargePoint’s executive officers have limited experience in the management of a publicly-traded company. The management team may not successfully or effectively continue the management of a public company that is subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws, particularly in light of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) increasing focus on former shell companies.
Their limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies could be a significant disadvantage in that it is likely that an increasing amount of their time may be forceddevoted to later write-downthese activities, which will result in less time being devoted to the management and growth of ChargePoint. ChargePoint may not have adequate personnel with the appropriate level
20

of knowledge, experience and training in the accounting policies, practices or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges thatinternal control over financial reporting required of public companies. The development and implementation of the standards and controls and the hiring of experienced personnel necessary to achieve the level of accounting standards required of a public company may require greater costs than expected.
ChargePoint’s future revenue growth will depend in significant part on its ability to increase sales of its products and services to fleet operators.
ChargePoint’s future revenue growth will depend in significant part on its ability to increase sales of its products and services to fleet operators. The electrification of fleets is an emerging market, and fleet operators may not adopt EVs on a widespread basis and on the timelines ChargePoint anticipates. In addition to the factors affecting the growth of the EV market generally, transitioning to an EV fleet can be costly and capital intensive, which could result in our reporting losses. Evenslower than anticipated adoption. The sales cycle could also be longer for sales to fleet operators, as they are often larger organizations, with more formal procurement processes than smaller commercial site hosts. Fleet operators may also require significant additional services and support, and if our due diligence successfully identifies certainChargePoint is unable to provide such services and support, it may adversely affect its ability to attract additional fleet operators as customers. Any failure to attract and retain fleet operators as customers in the future would adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations.
ChargePoint faces risks unexpectedrelated to global epidemics and health pandemics which could have a material and adverse effect on its business and results of operations.
ChargePoint faces risks related to global epidemics and health pandemics, like the COVID-19 pandemic, which may arisecreate significant volatility in the global economy and previously known risks may materialize inhave a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediatelong-lasting adverse impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this natureChargePoint and its industry. For instance, such epidemics may cause uslocal, regional or national governments to violate net worthimplement measures to contain pandemic risks, such as travel restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place order or other covenantsbusiness shutdowns. Any of these measures may adversely affect ChargePoint’s employees and operations and the operations of its customers, suppliers, vendors and business partners, and may negatively impact demand for EV charging stations, particularly at workplaces, or the supply of components necessary for the manufacture of charging stations.
For example, during calendar years 2020, 2021, and 2022, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, ChargePoint modified its business practices by recommending that all non-essential personnel work from home and cancelling or reducing physical participation in sales activities, meetings, events and conferences. As a result, many non-essential ChargePoint personnel have been working from home for almost three years in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. In May 2022, ChargePoint commenced a “return-to-office” plan, which weincluded shifting to a hybrid model where employees have the flexibility to work from home or from the office. In the fall of 2022, ChargePoint further refined its hybrid model to require most employees to return to office at least two days a week. A hybrid work model may be subjectcreate challenges, including challenges maintaining ChargePoint’s corporate culture, increasing attrition or limiting ChargePoint’s ability to attract employees if individuals prefer to continue working full time at home, or if there are instances of COVID-19 infections at the office. Future challenges related to ChargePoint’s “return-to-office” plans, hybrid work model or workplace practices could lead to attrition and difficulty attracting high-quality employees.
The effect of future health pandemics and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on ChargePoint’s business, prospects and results of operations will depend on their duration and sustained impact. Difficult macroeconomic conditions, such as supply shortages, increased inflation, increased and prolonged unemployment or a decline in consumer confidence as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining post-combination debt financing. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the business combination contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.


If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by stockholders may be less than $10.00 per share.

Our placing of funds in the Trust Account may not protect those funds from third-party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers (except for our independent registered public accounting firm), prospective target businesses and other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account for the benefit of our public stockholders, such parties may not execute such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements, they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the Trust Account, including, but not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims,pandemics, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the Trust Account. If any third-party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the Trust Account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative.

Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third-party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believedreduced spending by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason. Upon redemption of our public shares, if we are unable to complete our business combination within the prescribed timeframe, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in connection with our business combination, we will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption. Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount received by public stockholders could be less than the $10.00 per public share initially held in the Trust Account, due to claims of such creditors. Our Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party (other than our independent public accountants) for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we have entered into a written letter of intent, confidentiality or other similar agreement or business combination agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the Trust Account to below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, if less than $10.00 per share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes, provided that such liability will not apply to any claims by a third party or prospective target business who executed a waiver of any and all rights to the monies held in the Trust Account (whether or not such waiver is enforceable) nor will it apply to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of our Public Offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. However, we have not asked our Sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our Sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our Sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. As a result, if any such claims were successfully made against the Trust Account, the funds available for our initial business combination and redemptions could be reduced to less than $10.00 per public share. In such event, we may not be able to complete our initial business combination, and you would receive such lesser amount per share in connection with any redemption of your public shares. None of our officers or directors will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims by vendors and prospective target businesses.


Our directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligations of our Sponsor, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in the Trust Account available for distribution to our public stockholders.

In the event that the proceeds in the Trust Account are reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, if less than $10.00 per share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest which may be withdrawn to pay taxes, and our Sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations.

While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment and subject to their fiduciary duties may choose not to do so in any particular instance. If our independent directors choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the Trust Account available for distribution to our public stockholders may be reduced below $10.00 per share.

We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy indemnification claims of our directors and officers.

We have agreed to indemnify our officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. However, our officers and directors have agreed to waive any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the Trust Account. Accordingly, any indemnification provided will be able to be satisfied by us only if (i) we have sufficient funds outside of the Trust Account or (ii) we consummate an initial business combination. Our obligation to indemnify our officers and directors may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our officers and directors, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. Furthermore, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

If, after we distribute the proceeds in the Trust Account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy court may seek to recover such proceeds, and the members of our board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby exposing the members of our board of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.

If, after we distribute the proceeds in the Trust Account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by stockholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our stockholders. In addition, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and us to claims of punitive damages, by paying public stockholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors.

If, before distributing the proceeds in the Trust Account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our stockholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.

If, before distributing the proceeds in the Trust Account to our public stockholders, we file a bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the Trust Account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our stockholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.


If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete our business combination.

If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, our activities may be restricted, including:

restrictions on the nature of our investments; and

restrictions on the issuance of securities, each of which may make it difficult for us to complete our business combination.

In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:

registration as an investment company;

adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and

reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations.

In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of securities and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our business will be to identify and complete a business combination and thereafter to operate the post-transaction business or assets for the long term. We do not plan to buy businesses, or assets with a view to resale or profit from their resale. We do not plan to buy unrelated businesses or assets or to be a passive investor.

We do not believe that our anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end, the proceeds held in the Trust Account may only be invested in United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Pursuant to the trust agreement governing the Trust Account, the Trustee is not permitted to invest in other securities or assets. By restricting the investment of the proceeds to these instruments, and by having a business plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses for the long term (rather than on buying and selling businesses in the manner of a merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid being deemed an “investment company” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. The Trust Account is intended as a holding place for funds pending the earliest to occur of: (i) the completion of our initial business combination; (ii) the redemption of any public shares properly submitted in connection with a stockholder vote to approve an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering; or (iii) the redemption of our public shares if we are unable to complete our business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering, subject to applicable law. If we do not invest the proceeds as discussed above, we may be deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act. If we were deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act, compliance with additional regulatory burdens would require additional expenses for which we have not allotted funds and may hinder our ability to complete a business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to public stockholders, and our Warrants will expire worthless.

Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, and results of operations.

We are subject to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, we are required to comply with certain SEC and other legal requirements. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, and results of operations.


Our stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.

Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. The pro rata portion of our Trust Account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not complete our initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering may be considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law. If a corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. However, it is our intention to redeem our public shares as soon as reasonably possible following the 24th month from the closing of our Public Offering in the event we do not complete our business combination and, therefore, we do not intend to comply with the foregoing procedures.

Because we will not be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires us to adopt a plan, based on facts known to us at such time that will provide for our payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against us within the 10 years following our dissolution. However, because we are a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and our operations will be limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from our vendors (such as lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) or prospective target businesses. If our plan of distribution complies with Section 281(b) of the DGCL, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would likely be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. We cannot assure you that we will properly assess all claims that may be potentially brought against us. As such, our stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of our stockholders may extend beyond the third anniversary of such date. Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of our Trust Account distributed to our public stockholders upon the redemption of our public shares in the event we do not complete our initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering is not considered a liquidating distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidating distribution.

We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after the consummation of our initial business combination, which could delay the opportunity for our stockholders to elect directors.

In accordance with NYSE corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual meeting until no later than one year after our first fiscal year end following our listing on the NYSE. Under Section 211(b) of the DGCL, we are, however, required to hold an annual meeting of stockholders for the purposes of electing directors in accordance with our bylaws unless such election is made by written consent in lieu of such a meeting. We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders to elect new directors prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, and thus we may not be in compliance with Section 211(b) of the DGCL, which requires an annual meeting. Therefore, if our stockholders want us to hold an annual meeting prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, they may attempt to force us to hold one by submitting an application to the Delaware Court of Chancery in accordance with Section 211(c) of the DGCL.


We have not registered the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants under the Securities Act or any state securities laws, and such registration may not be in place when an investor desires to exercise Warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise its Warrants except on a cashless basis and potentially causing such Warrants to expire worthless.

We have not registered the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants under the Securities Act or any state securities laws. However, under the terms of the warrant agreement governing the terms of our warrants, we have agreed that as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days after the closing of our initial business combination, we will use our best efforts to file a registration statement under the Securities Act covering such shares. We will use our best efforts to cause the same to become effective, but in no event later than 60 business days after the closing of our initial business combination, and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement, and a current prospectus relating thereto, until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement or prospectus, the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference therein are not current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order. If the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants are not registered under the Securities Act, we will be required to permit holders to exercise their Warrants on a cashless basis. However, no Warrant will be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking to exercise their Warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws of the state of the exercising holder, or an exemption from registration is available. Notwithstanding the above, if our Class A common stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, require holders of Warrants who exercise their Warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, but we will be required to use our best efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. In no event will we be required to net cash settle any Warrant, or issue securities or other compensation in exchange for the Warrants in the event that we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the Warrants under the Securities Act or applicable state securities laws, and there is no exemption available. If the issuance of the shares upon exercise of the Warrants is not so registered or qualified or exempt from registration or qualification, the holder of such Warrant shall not be entitled to exercise such Warrant and such Warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their Warrants as part of a purchase of Units will have paid the full Unit purchase price solely for the shares of Class A common stock included in the Units. If and when the Warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying shares of Class A common stock for sale under all applicable state securities laws.

The grant of registration rights to our initial stockholders may make it more difficult to complete our initial business combination, and the future exercise of such rights may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

Pursuant to an agreement entered into in connection with our Public Offering, our initial stockholders and their permitted transferees can demand that we register the shares of Class A common stock into which Founder Shares are convertible, holders of our Private Placement Warrants and their permitted transferees can demand that we register the Private Placement Warrants and the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Private Placement Warrants and holders of warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans may demand that we register the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants. We will bear the cost of registering these securities. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A common stock. In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our initial business combination more costly or difficult to conclude. This is because the stockholders of the target business may increase the equity stake they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price of our Class A common stock that is expected when the securities owned by our initial stockholders, holders of our Private Placement Warrants, holders of warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans or their respective permitted transferees are registered.


Because we are not limited to a particular industry, sector or any specific target businesses with which to pursue our initial business combination, you will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations.

Although we expect to focus our search for a target business in the energy industry, we may complete a business combination with an operating company in any industry or sector. However, we will not, under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, be permitted to effectuate our business combination with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations. There is no basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition or prospects. To the extent we complete our business combination, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations with which we combine. For example, if we combine with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenues or earnings, we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially unstable or a development stage entity. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our securities will ultimately prove to be more favorable to investors than a direct investment, if such opportunity were available, in a business combination target. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials (as applicable) relating to the business combination contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.

Because we intend to seek a business combination with a target business or businesses in the energy industry, we expect our future operations to be subject to risks associated with this industry.

We intend to focus our search for a target business in the energy industry in North America. Because we have not yet selected or approached any specific target business or sector, we cannot provide specific risks of any business combination. However, risks inherent in investments in the energy industry include, but are not limited to, the following:

volatility of oil and natural gas prices, including volatility caused by the lack of agreement on production levels by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and Russia;

uncertainty about the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and the risk of oil and gas production outweighing consumption;

price and availability of alternative fuels, such as solar, coal, nuclear and wind energy;

competitive pressures in the utility industry, primarily in wholesale markets, as a result of consumer demand, technological advances, greater availability of natural gas and other factors;

significant federal, state and local regulation, taxation and regulatory approval processes as well as changes in applicable laws and regulations;

the speculative nature of and high degree of risk involved in investments in the upstream, midstream and energy services sectors, including relying on estimates of oil and gas reserves and the impacts of regulatory and tax changes;

drilling, exploration and development risks, including encountering unexpected formations or pressures, premature declines of reservoirs, blow-outs, equipment failures and other accidents, cratering, sour gas releases, uncontrollable flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, adverse weather conditions, pollution, fires, spills and other environmental risks, any of which could lead to environmental damage, injury and loss of life or the destruction of property;


proximity and capacity of oil, natural gas and other transportation and support infrastructure to production facilities;

availability of key inputs, such as strategic consumables, raw materials and drilling and processing equipment;

changes in global supply and demand and prices for commodities;

impact of energy conservation efforts;

technological advances affecting energy production and consumption;

overall domestic and global economic conditions;

availability of, and potential disputes with, independent contractors;

natural disasters, terrorist acts and similar dislocations; and

value of U.S. dollar relative to the currencies of other countries.

Our search for a business combination, and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected by the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, which has and is continuing to spread throughout China and other parts of the world, including the United States. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.” On January 31, 2020, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex M. Azar II declared a public health emergency for the United States to aid the U.S. healthcare community in responding to COVID-19, and on March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak as a “pandemic”. A significant outbreak of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets worldwide, and the business of any potential target business with which we consummate a business combination could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we may be unable to complete a business combination if continued concerns relating to COVID-19 restrict travel, limit the ability to have meetings with potential investors or the target company’s personnel, vendors and services providers are unavailable to negotiate and consummate a transaction in a timely manner. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our search for a business combination will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 or other matters of global concern continue for an extensive period of time, our ability to consummate a business combination, or the operations of a target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected.

Past performance by NGP and our management team may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in us.

Information regarding performance by, or businesses associated with, NGP and its affiliates and our management team is presented for informational purposes only. Past performance by NGP and our management team is not a guarantee either (i) of success with respect to any business combination we may consummate or (ii) that we will be able to locate a suitable candidate for our initial business combination. You should not rely on the historical record of NGP’s or our management team’s performance as indicative of our future performance or of an investment in us or the returns we will, or are likely to, generate going forward. Other than Scott Gieselman and Joseph Armes, none of our officers or directors has had experience with blank check companies or special purpose acquisition companies in the past.

We may seek acquisition opportunities in industries or sectors outside of the energy industry (which industries may or may not be outside of our management’s areas of expertise).

Although we intend to focus on identifying business combination candidates in the energy industry, we will consider a business combination outside of the energy industry if a business combination candidate is presented to us and we determine that such candidate offers an attractive acquisition opportunity for the Company or we are unable to identify a suitable candidate in the energy industry after having expended a reasonable amount of time and effort in an attempt to do so. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular business combination candidate, we cannot assure you that we will adequately ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our securities will not ultimately prove to be less favorable than a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in a business combination candidate. In the event we elect to pursue an acquisition outside of the energy industry, our management’s expertise may not be directly applicable to its evaluation or operation, and the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding the energy industry would not be relevant to an understanding of the business that we elect to acquire. As a result, our management may not be able to adequately ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following our business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.


Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into our initial business combination with a target that does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the target business with which we enter into our initial business combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.

Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with which we enter into our initial business combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we complete our initial business combination with a target that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective business combination with a target that does not meet our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of stockholders may exercise their redemption rights, which may make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. In addition, if stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or we decide to obtain stockholder approval for business or other legal reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain stockholder approval of our initial business combination if the target business does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to public stockholders, and our Warrants will expire worthless.

We may seek acquisition opportunities with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenue or earnings, which could subject us to volatile revenues, cash flows or earnings or difficulty in retaining key personnel.

To the extent we complete our initial business combination with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenues, cash flows or earnings, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the operations of the business with which we combine. These risks include volatile revenues, cash flows or earnings and difficulties in obtaining and retaining key personnel. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we may not be able to properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors and we may not have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business.

We are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or from an independent accounting firm, and consequently, you may have no assurance from an independent source that the price we are paying for the business is fair to the Company from a financial point of view.

Unless we complete our business combination with an affiliated entity, we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA or from an independent accounting firm that the price we are paying is fair to the Company from a financial point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our stockholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed in our proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, related to our initial business combination. If our board of directors is not able to independently determine the fair market value of our initial business combination, we will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm. However, our stockholders may not be provided with a copy of such opinion, nor will they be able to rely on such opinion.


We may issue additional common stock or preferred stock to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial business combination. We may also issue shares of Class A common stock upon the conversion of the Class B common stock at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our stockholders and likely present other risks.

We may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common or preferred stock to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial business combination. We may also issue shares of Class A common stock upon conversion of the Class B common stock at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. The issuance of additional shares of common or preferred stock:

may significantly dilute the equity interests of our investors;

may subordinate the rights of holders of common stock if preferred stock is issued with rights senior to those afforded our common stock;

could cause a change in control if a substantial number of shares of our common stock are issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors; and

may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our Units, Class A common stock and/or Warrants.

Unlike some other similarly structured blank check companies, our initial stockholders will receive additional shares of Class A common stock if we issue shares to consummate an initial business combination.

The Founder Shares will automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock at the time of our initial business combination on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like. In the case that additional shares of Class A common stock, or equity-linked securities convertible or exercisable for shares of Class A common stock, are issued or deemed issued in excess of the amounts sold in our Public Offering and related to the closing of our initial business combination, the ratio at which Founder Shares will convert into shares of Class A common stock will be adjusted so that the number of shares of Class A common stock issuable upon conversion of all Founder Shares will equal, in the aggregate 20% of the sum of our shares of common stock outstanding upon completion of our Public Offering plus the number of shares of Class A common stock and equity-linked securities issued or deemed issued in connection with our initial business combination, excluding and any shares of Class A common stock or equity-linked securities issued, or to be issued, to any seller in our initial business combination.

Resources could be wasted in researching acquisitions that are not completed, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to public stockholders, and our Warrants will expire worthless.

We anticipate that the investigation of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys, consultants and others. If we decide not to complete a specific initial business combination, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target business, we may fail to complete our initial business combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to public stockholders, and our Warrants will expire worthless.

We are dependent upon our officers and directors, and their loss could adversely affect our ability to operate.

Our operations are dependent upon a relatively small group of individuals and, in particular, our officers and directors. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have completed our initial business combination. In addition, our officers and directors are not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs and, accordingly, will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time among various business activities, including identifying potential business combinations and monitoring the related due diligence. We do not have an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or officers. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of our directors or officers could have a detrimental effect on us.


Our ability to successfully effect our initial business combination and to be successful thereafter will be totally dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel, some of whom may join us following our initial business combination. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.

Our ability to successfully effect our business combination is dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. The role of our key personnel in the target business, however, cannot presently be ascertained. Although some of our key personnel may remain with the target business in senior management or advisory positions following our business combination, it is likely that some or all of the management of the target business will remain in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals we engage after our initial business combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.

In addition, the officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon completion of our initial business combination. The departure of a business combination target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business. The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate following our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain in place. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.

Our key personnel may negotiate employment or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with a particular business combination, and a particular business combination may be conditioned on the retention or resignation of such key personnel. These agreements may provide for them to receive compensation following our business combination and, as a result, may cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular business combination is the most advantageous.

Our key personnel may be able to remain with our company after the completion of our business combination only if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection with the business combination. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the business combination and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash payments and/or our securities for services they would render to us after the completion of the business combination. Such negotiations also could make such key personnel’s retention or resignation a condition to any such agreement. The personal and financial interests of such individuals may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business.

We may have a limited ability to assess the management of a prospective target business and, as a result, may effect our initial business combination with a target business whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company, which could, in turn, negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.

When evaluating the desirability of effecting our initial business combination with a prospective target business, our ability to assess the target business’s management may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the target business’s management, therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we suspected. Should the target business’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials (as applicable) relating to the business combination contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.


The officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon completion of our initial business combination. The loss of a business combination target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.

The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate following our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain in place.

Our officers and directors may allocate their time to other businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs. This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial business combination.

Our officers and directors are not required to, and our directors will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and our search for a business combination and other businesses. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the completion of our initial business combination. Our officers are not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our affairs. In addition, certain of our directors are employed by NGP, which is an investment manager to various private investment funds, which make investments in securities or other interests of or relating to companies in industries we may target for our initial business combination. Our independent directors may also serve as officers or board members for other entities. If our officers’ and directors’ other business affairs require them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs in excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs which may have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial business combination.

Certain of our directors are now and may in the future become affiliated with entities engaged in business activities similar to those intended to be conducted by us and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.

Until we consummate our initial business combination, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses. Certain of our directors are and may in the future become affiliated with entities that are engaged in a similar business.

Our directors also may become aware of business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us and the other entities to which they owe certain fiduciary or contractual duties.

Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in our favor and a potential target business may be presented to another entity prior to its presentation to us. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that we renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Company and such opportunity is one we are legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue.

Our officers, directors, security holders and their respective affiliates may have competitive pecuniary interests that conflict with our interests.

We have not adopted a policy that expressly prohibits our directors, officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniary or financial interest in any investment to be acquired or disposed of by us or in any transaction to which we are a party or have an interest. In fact, we may enter into a business combination with a target business that is affiliated with our Sponsor, our directors or officers, although we do not intend to do so, or we may acquire a target business through an Affiliated Joint Acquisition with one or more affiliates of NGP and/or one or more investors in the NGP Funds. We do not have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types conducted by us. Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a conflict between their interests and ours.


In particular, NGP and its affiliates also are focused on investments in the energy industry. As a result, there may be substantial overlap between companies that would be a suitable business combination for us and companies that would make an attractive target for such other affiliates.

We may engage in a business combination with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with our Sponsor, officers, directors or existing holders which may raise potential conflicts of interest.

In light of the involvement or potential involvement of our Sponsor, officers and directors with other entities, we may decide to acquire one or more businesses affiliated with our Sponsor, officers, directors or existing holders. Our directors also serve as officers and board members for other entities. Such entities may compete with us for business combination opportunities. Although we will not be specifically focusing on, or targeting, any transaction with any affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such affiliated entity met our criteria for a business combination and such transaction was approved by a majority of our independent and disinterested directors. Despite our obligation to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm that is a member of FINRA or from an independent accounting firm regarding the fairness to the Company from a financial point of view of a business combination with one or more domestic or international businesses affiliated with our Sponsor, officers or directors, potential conflicts of interest still may exist and, as a result, the terms of the business combination may not be as advantageous to our public stockholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.

Moreover, we may pursue an Affiliated Joint Acquisition opportunity with an entity affiliated with NGP and/or one or more investors in the NGP Funds. Any such parties may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such parties a class of equity or equity-linked securities.

Since our Sponsor, officers and directors will lose their entire investment in us if our business combination is not completed (other than with respect to public shares they may acquire), a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular business combination target is appropriate for our initial business combination.

On May 16, 2019, our Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 8,625,000 Founder Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000, or approximately $0.003 per share. In July 2019, our Sponsor transferred 40,000 Founder Shares to each of our independent directors at their original purchase price. In September 2019, our Sponsor forfeited an aggregate of 772,059 Founder Shares. The Founder Shares will be worthless if we do not complete an initial business combination. In addition, our Sponsor has purchased an aggregate of 5,521,568 Private Placement Warrants, each exercisable for one share of our Class A common stock at $11.50 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8.3 million, or $1.50 per warrant, that will also be worthless if we do not complete a business combination. The Founder Shares are identical to the shares of Class A common stock included in the units being sold in this offering, except that only holders of the Founder Shares have the right to vote on the election of directors prior to our initial business combination and they are shares of Class B common stock that automatically convert into shares of our Class A common stock at the time of our initial business combination on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment pursuant to certain anti-dilution rights, as described herein. However, the holders have agreed (A) to vote any shares owned by them in favor of any proposed business combination and (B) not to redeem any Founder Shares in connection with a stockholder vote to approve a proposed initial business combination. In addition, we may obtain loans from our Sponsor, affiliates of our Sponsor or an officer or director. The personal and financial interests of our officers and directors may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business combination, completing an initial business combination and influencing the operation of the business following our initial business combination. This risk may become more acute as the 24-month anniversary of the closing of our Public Offering nears, which is the deadline for our completion of an initial business combination.

Since our Sponsor paid only approximately $0.003 per share for the Founder Shares, our officers and directors could potentially make a substantial profit even if we acquire a target business that subsequently declines in value.

On May 16, 2019, our Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 8,625,000 Founder Shares for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000, or approximately $0.003 per share. In July 2019, our Sponsor transferred 40,000 Founder Shares to each of our independent directors at their original purchase price. In September 2019, our Sponsor forfeited an aggregate of 772,059 Founder Shares. Our officers and directors have a significant economic interest in our Sponsor. As a result, the low acquisition cost of the Founder Shares creates an economic incentive whereby our officers and directors could potentially make a substantial profit even if we acquire a target business that subsequently declines in value and is unprofitable for public investors.


We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely affect our leverage and financial condition and thus negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.

We may choose to incur substantial debt to complete our business combination. The incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:

default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after an initial business combination are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;

acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;

our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security is payable on demand;

our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt security contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding;

our inability to pay dividends on our common stock;

using a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our common stock if declared, to pay expenses, make capital expenditures and acquisitions and fund other general corporate purposes;

limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;

increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation;

limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, and execution of our strategy; and

other disadvantages compared to our competitors who have less debt.

We may only be able to complete one business combination with the proceeds of our Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, which will cause us to be solely dependent on a single business which may have a limited number of products or services. This lack of diversification may negatively impact our operations and profitability.

We may effectuate our business combination with a single target business or multiple target businesses simultaneously or within a short period of time. However, we may not be able to effectuate our business combination with more than one target business because of various factors, including the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma financial statements with the SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated on a combined basis. By completing our initial business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations in different industries or different areas of a single industry. In addition, we intend to focus our search for an initial business combination in a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be:

solely dependent upon the performance of a single business, property or asset, or

dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.

This lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to our business combination.

We may attempt to simultaneously complete business combinations with multiple prospective targets, which may hinder our ability to complete our business combination and give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.

If we determine to simultaneously acquire several businesses that are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete our initial business combination. With multiple business combinations, we could also face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact our profitability and results of operations.

We may attempt to complete our initial business combination with a private company about which little information is available, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.

In pursuing our business combination strategy, we may seek to effectuate our initial business combination with a privately held company. Very little public information generally exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial business combination on the basis of limited information, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.

Our management may not be able to maintain control of a target business after our initial business combination. We cannot provide assurance that, upon loss of control of a target business, new management will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably operate such business.

We may structure a business combination so that the post-transaction company in which our public stockholders own shares will own less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of a target business, but we will only complete such business combination if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires an interest in the target sufficient for the post-transaction company not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We will not consider any transaction that does not meet such criteria. Even if the post-transaction company owns 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our stockholders prior to the business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post business combination company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business combination transaction. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial number of new shares in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we would acquire a 100% interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new shares, our stockholders immediately prior to such transaction could own less than a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock subsequent to such transaction. In addition, other minority stockholders may subsequently combine their holdings resulting in a single person or group obtaining a larger share of the Company’s stock than we initially acquired. Accordingly, this may make it more likely that our management will not be able to maintain control of the target business.


We do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold may make it possible for us to complete a business combination with which a substantial majority of our stockholders do not agree.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not provide a specified maximum redemption threshold, except that in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we are not subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). As a result, we may be able to complete our business combination even though a substantial majority of our public stockholders do not agree with the transaction and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek stockholder approval of our initial business combination and do not conduct redemptions in connection with our business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, have entered into privately negotiated agreements to sell their shares to our Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or any of their affiliates. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to pay for all shares of Class A common stock that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed business combination exceeds the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will not complete the business combination or redeem any shares, all shares of Class A common stock submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof, and we instead may search for an alternate business combination.

In order to effectuate our initial business combination, we may seek to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or other governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our initial business combination but that our stockholders or warrantholders may not support.

In order to effectuate a business combination, we may amend various provisions of our charter and governing instruments, including the warrant agreement, the underwriting agreement relating to our Public Offering, the letter agreement among us and our Sponsor, officers and directors, and the registration rights agreement among us and our initial stockholders. These agreements contain various provisions that our public stockholders might deem to be material. While we do not expect our board to approve any amendment to any of these agreements prior to our initial business combination, it may be possible that our board, in exercising its business judgment and subject to its fiduciary duties, chooses to approve one or more amendments to any such agreement in connection with the consummation of our initial business combination. Except in relation to the charter, any such amendments would not require approval from our stockholders and may have an adverse effect on the value of an investment in our securities. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our charter or other governing instruments or change our industry focus in order to effectuate our initial business combination.

The provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that relate to our pre-business combination activity (and corresponding provisions of the agreement governing the release of funds from the Trust Account) may be amended with the approval of holders of 65% of our common stock, which is a lower amendment threshold than that of some other blank check companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the trust agreement to facilitate the completion of an initial business combination that some of our stockholders may not support.

Some other blank check companies have a provision in their charter which prohibits the amendment of certain of its provisions, including those which relate to a company’s pre-business combination activity, without approval by a certain percentage of the company’s stockholders. In those companies, amendment of these provisions requires approval by between 90% and 100% of the company’s public stockholders. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that any of its provisions (other than amendments relating to the appointment of directors, which require the approval of a majority of at least 90% of our common stock voting at a stockholder meeting) related to pre-business combination activity (including the requirement to deposit proceeds of our Public Offering and the private placement of warrants into the Trust Account and not release such amounts except in specified circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to public stockholders) may be amended if approved by holders of 65% of our common stock entitled to vote thereon, and corresponding provisions of the trust agreement governing the release of funds from our Trust Account may be amended if approved by holders of 65% of our common stock entitled to vote thereon. In all other instances, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may be amended by holders of a majority of our outstanding common stock entitled to vote thereon, subject to applicable provisions of the DGCL or applicable stock exchange rules. Our initial stockholders, who collectively beneficially own 20.3% of our common stock, will participate in any vote to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and/or trust agreement and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation which govern our pre-business combination behavior more easily than some other blank check companies, and this may increase our ability to complete a business combination with which you do not agree. Our stockholders may pursue remedies against us for any breach of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

Our Sponsor, officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Public Offering, unless we provide our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of Class A common stock upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes, divided by the number of then outstanding public shares. These agreements are contained in a letter agreement that we have entered into with our Sponsor, officers and directors. Our stockholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries of, these agreements and, as a result, will not have the ability to pursue remedies against our Sponsor, officers or directors for any breach of these agreements. As a result, in the event of a breach, our stockholders would need to pursue a stockholder derivative action, subject to applicable law.


We may be unable to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target business, which could compel us to restructure or abandon a particular business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to public stockholders, and our Warrants will expire worthless.

If the net proceeds of our Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants prove to be insufficient to complete our initial business combination, either because of the size of our initial business combination, the depletion of the available net proceeds in search of a target business, the obligation to redeem for cash a significant number of shares from stockholders who elect redemption in connection with our initial business combination or the terms of negotiated transactions to purchase shares in connection with our initial business combination, we may be required to seek additional financing or to abandon the proposed business combination. We cannot assure you that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed to complete our initial business combination, we would be compelled to either restructure the transaction or abandon that particular business combination and seek an alternative target business candidate. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public stockholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to public stockholders, and our Warrants will expire worthless. In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to complete our business combination, we may require such financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continueddemand for ChargePoint’s products and services. The effect of, or even the threats of, a new global pandemic can also vary over time and across the geographies in which ChargePoint operates. For example, variations in “work-from-home” or “return-to-office” policies can cause fluctuations in ChargePoint’s revenues because conditions caused by global pandemics, such as more permanent work-from-home policies, are likely to continue affecting the rate of global infrastructure spending, and thus to continue to adversely impact ChargePoint’s gross margins as ChargePoint’s commercial business tends to contribute higher gross margins than its residential and fleet businesses. Even after the acute impact from any pandemic has subsided, ChargePoint may continue to experience an adverse impact to its business as a result of the pandemic’s global economic impact, including any recession that has occurred or may occur in the future.

ChargePoint is highly reliant on its networked charging solution and information technology systems and data, and those of its service providers and component suppliers, any of which systems and data may be subject to cyber-attacks, service disruptions or other security incidents, which could result in data breaches, loss or interruption of services, intellectual property theft, claims, litigation, regulatory investigations, significant liability, reputational damage and other adverse consequences.
ChargePoint continues to expand its information technology systems in the form of its networked charging solution, and as its operations grow, its internal information technology systems, such as product data management, procurement, inventory management, production planning and execution, sales, service and logistics, financial, tax and regulatory compliance systems. This includes the implementation of new internally developed systems and the deployment of such systems in the United States and abroad. The implementation, maintenance, segregation and improvement of these systems require significant management time, support and cost, and there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving and expanding ChargePoint’s core systems as well as implementing new systems and updating current systems, including disruptions to the related areas of business operations. These risks may affect ChargePoint’s ability to manage its data and inventory, procure parts or supplies or manufacture, sell, deliver and service products, adequately protect its intellectual property or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, tax laws and other applicable regulations.
21

While ChargePoint maintains information technology measures designed to protect it against intellectual property theft, data breaches, sabotage and other external or internal cyber-attacks or misappropriation, its systems and those of its service providers are potentially vulnerable to malware, ransomware, viruses, denial-of-service attacks, phishing attacks, social engineering, computer hacking, unauthorized access, exploitation of bugs, defects and vulnerabilities, breakdowns, damage, interruptions, system malfunctions, power outages, terrorism, acts of vandalism, security breaches, security incidents, inadvertent or intentional actions by employees or other third parties, and other cyber-attacks. To the extent any security incident results in unauthorized access or damage to or acquisition, use, corruption, loss, destruction, alteration or dissemination of ChargePoint data, including intellectual property and personal information, or ChargePoint products, or for it to be believed or reported that any of these occurred, it could disrupt ChargePoint’s business, harm its reputation, compel it to comply with applicable data breach notification laws, subject it to time consuming, distracting and expensive litigation, regulatory investigation and oversight, mandatory corrective action, require it to verify the correctness of database contents, or otherwise subject it to liability under laws, regulations and contractual obligations, including those that protect the privacy and security of personal information. This could result in increased costs to ChargePoint and result in significant legal and financial exposure and/or reputational harm.
Because ChargePoint also relies on third-party service providers, it cannot guarantee that its service providers’ and component suppliers’ systems have not been breached or that they do not contain exploitable defects, bugs, or vulnerabilities that could result in a security incident, or other disruption to, ChargePoint’s or ChargePoint’s service providers’ or component suppliers’ systems. ChargePoint’s ability to monitor its service providers’ and component suppliers’ security measures is limited, and, in any event, malicious third parties may be able to circumvent those security measures.
If ChargePoint does not successfully implement, maintain or expand its information technology systems as planned, its operations may be disrupted, its ability to accurately and/or timely report its financial results could be impaired and deficiencies may arise in its internal control over financial reporting, which may impact its ability to certify its financial results (see also “Risks Related to Legal Matters and Regulations--ChargePoint may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and the restatement of its financial statements,” and “Financial, Tax and Accounting-Related Risks--ChargePoint has identified, and has previously identified, material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint is unable to remediate these material weaknesses, or if ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations,” for more detail). Moreover, ChargePoint’s proprietary information, including intellectual property and personal information, could be compromised or misappropriated, its reputation may be adversely affected if these systems or their functionality do not operate as expected and ChargePoint may be required to expend significant resources to make corrections or find alternative sources for performing these functions.
Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking, phishing attacks and similar disruptions could result in security and privacy breaches and interruption in service, which could harm ChargePoint’s business.
Computer malware, viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions could lead to interruption and delays in ChargePoint’s services and operations and loss, misuse or theft of data. Computer malware, viruses, ransomware, hacking and phishing attacks against online networks have become more prevalent and may occur on ChargePoint’s systems in the future. Cyber security organizations in many countries have published warnings of increased cybersecurity threats to U.S. businesses, and external events, like the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, may increase the likelihood of cybersecurity attacks, particularly directed at energy, fueling or infrastructure service providers. Any attempts by cyber attackers to disrupt ChargePoint’s services or systems, if successful, could harm its business, introduce liability to data subjects, result in the misappropriation of funds, be expensive to remedy, subject ChargePoint to substantial fines, penalties, damages and other liabilities under applicable laws and regulations, lead to a loss of protection of its intellectual property or trade secrets and damage its reputation or brand. Insurance may not be sufficient to cover significant expenses and losses related to cyber-attacks. Efforts to prevent cyber attackers from entering computer systems are expensive to implement, and ChargePoint may not be able to cause the implementation or enforcement of such preventions with respect to its third-party vendors. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of systems and technical infrastructure may, in addition to other losses, harm ChargePoint’s reputation, brand and ability to attract customers.
ChargePoint has previously experienced, and may in the future experience, service disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, third-party service providers, component supplier and manufacturer disruptions, human or software errors and capacity constraints. If ChargePoint’s services are unavailable when users attempt to access them, they may seek other services, which could reduce demand for ChargePoint’s solutions from target customers.
ChargePoint has processes and procedures in place designed to enable it to quickly recover from a disaster or catastrophe and continue business operations and has tested this capability under controlled circumstances. However, there are several factors ranging from human error to data corruption that could materially impact the efficacy of such processes and procedures, including by lengthening the time services are partially or fully unavailable to customers and users. It may be difficult or impossible to perform some or all recovery steps and continue normal business operations due to the nature of a particular disaster or catastrophe, especially during peak periods, which could cause additional reputational damages, or loss of revenue, any of which could adversely affect its business and financial results.
22

ChargePoint’s business is subject to risks associated with natural disasters and the adverse effects associated with climate change, including earthquakes, wildfires, or other types of natural disasters or resource shortages, including public safety power shut-offs that have occurred and may continue to occur in California, the effects of which could disrupt and harm its operations and those of ChargePoint’s customers.
ChargePoint conducts a majority of its operations in the San Francisco Bay Area in an area projected to be vulnerable to future water scarcity and sea level rise due to climate change as well as in an active earthquake zone. The occurrence of a natural disaster such as an earthquake, drought, flood, fire (such as the increasingly frequent wildfires in California), localized extended outages of critical utilities (such as California’s public safety power shut-offs) or transportation systems, or any critical resource shortages could cause a significant interruption in its business, damage or destroy ChargePoint’s facilities or inventories, and cause it to incur significant costs, any of which could harm its business, financial condition and results of operations. The insurance ChargePoint maintains against fires, earthquakes and other natural disasters may not be adequate to cover losses in any particular case.
In addition, rolling public safety power shut-offs in California or other states can affect user acceptance of EVs, as charging may be unavailable at the desired times, or at all during these events. These shut-offs could also affect the ability of fleet operators to charge their EVs, which, for example, could adversely affect transportation schedules or any service level agreements to which either ChargePoint or the fleet operator may be a party. If these events persist, the demand for EVs could decline, which would result in reduced demand for charging solutions.
Seasonality may cause fluctuations in ChargePoint’s revenue.
ChargePoint believes there are seasonal factors that may cause ChargePoint to record higher revenue in some quarters compared with others. A significant share of ChargePoint’s annual revenues are typically generated in the fourth fiscal quarter, which coincides with customers with a December 31 year-end choosing to spend remaining unused portions of their budgets. ChargePoint’s revenues have historically been lower in its first fiscal quarter than its preceding fourth quarter, due to, in part, unfavorable weather conditions which result in a decrease in construction activity during the winter months, periods of wet weather and times when other weather and climate conditions would impair construction activity. While ChargePoint believes it has visibility into the seasonality of its business, various factors, including difficult weather conditions (such as flooding, hurricanes, prolonged rain or periods of unseasonably cold temperatures or snowstorms) in any quarter, may materially and adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.
ChargePoint is susceptible to risks associated with an increased focus by stakeholders and regulators on climate change, which may adversely affect its business and results of operations.
Climate-related events, including the increasing frequency of extreme weather events and their impact on critical infrastructure in the United States and elsewhere, have the potential to disrupt ChargePoint’s business and those of its third-party suppliers, and customers, and may cause ChargePoint to experience higher attrition, losses and additional costs to maintain or resume operations. In addition, ChargePoint’s customers may begin to establish sourcing requirements related to sustainability. As a result, ChargePoint may receive requests for sustainability related information about its products, business operations, use of sustainable materials and packaging. ChargePoint’s inability to comply with these and other sustainability requirements in the future could adversely affect sales of and demand for its products.
Further, there is an increased focus, including by governmental and nongovernmental organizations, investors, customers, and other stakeholders, on climate change matters, including increased pressure to expand disclosures related to the physical and transition risks related to climate change or to establish sustainability goals, such as the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, which could expose ChargePoint to market, operational and execution costs or risks. ChargePoint’s failure to establish such sustainability targets or targets that are perceived to be appropriate, as well as to achieve progress on those targets on a timely basis, or at all, could adversely affect the reputation of its brand and sales of and demand for its products. To the extent legislation is passed, such as proposed rules by the SEC with respect to enhanced and standardized climate-related disclosures, ChargePoint would incur significant additional costs of compliance due to the need for expanded data collection, analysis, and certification with respect to greenhouse gas emissions and other climate change related risks. ChargePoint may also incur additional costs or require additional resources to monitor, report and comply with such stakeholder expectations and standards and legislation, and to meet climate change targets and commitments if established.
Risks Related to the EV Market
ChargePoint’s future growth and success is highly correlated with and thus dependent upon the continuing rapid adoption of EVs for passenger and fleet applications.
ChargePoint’s future growth is highly dependent upon the adoption of EVs by businesses and consumers. The market for EVs is still rapidly evolving, characterized by rapidly changing technologies, competitive pricing and competitive factors, evolving government regulation and industry standards and changing consumer demands and behaviors, changing levels of concern related to environmental issues and governmental initiatives related to energy independence, climate change and the environment generally. Although demand for EVs has grown in recent years, there is no guarantee of continuing future demand. If the market for EVs develops more slowly than
23

expected, or if demand for EVs decreases, ChargePoint’s business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would be harmed. The market for EVs could be affected by numerous factors, such as:
perceptions about EV features, quality, safety, performance and cost;
perceptions about the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge;
competition, including from other types of alternative fuel vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and high fuel-economy internal combustion engine vehicles;
volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline, including as a result of trade restrictions;
concerns regarding the reliability and stability of the electrical grid;
the change in an EV battery’s ability to hold a charge over time;
the availability and reliability of a national electric vehicle charging network or infrastructure;
availability of maintenance and repair services for EVs;
consumers’ perception about the convenience and cost of charging EVs;
increases in fuel efficiency of non-electric vehicles;
government regulations and economic incentives, including adverse changes in, or expiration of, favorable tax incentives related to EVs, EV charging stations or decarbonization generally;
relaxation of government mandates or quotas regarding the sale of EVs; and
concerns about the future viability of EV manufacturers.
In addition, sales of vehicles in the automotive industry can be cyclical, which may affect growth in acceptance of EVs. It is uncertain how macroeconomic factors will impact demand for EVs, particularly since EVs can be more expensive than traditional gasoline-powered vehicles, when the automotive industry globally has been experiencing a recent decline in sales. Furthermore, because fleet operators often make large purchases of EVs, this cyclicality and volatility in the automotive industry may be more pronounced with commercial purchasers, and any significant decline in demand from these customers could reduce demand for EV charging and ChargePoint’s products and services in particular.
Demand for EVs may also be affected by factors directly impacting automobile prices or the cost of purchasing and operating automobiles, such as sales and financing incentives, prices of raw materials and parts and components, cost of fuel and governmental regulations, including tariffs, import regulation and other taxes. Further, the automotive industry in general and EV manufacturing have experienced recent substantial supply chain interruptions due in part to COVID-19 and a worldwide semiconductor shortage adversely impacting the automotive industry, resulting in reduced EV production schedules and sales. Volatility in demand or delays in EV production due to global supply chain constraints may lead to lower vehicle unit sales, which may result in reduced demand for EV charging solutions and therefore adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, financial condition and operating results.
The EV market currently benefits from the availability of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives from governments, utilities and others to offset the purchase or operating costs of EVs and EV charging stations. In particular, ChargePoint’s marketing efforts have historically promoted federal tax credits available to purchasers of its EV charging stations that effectively provide purchasers with a significantly discounted purchase price. The reduction, modification, or elimination of such benefits could cause reduced demand for EVs and EV charging stations, which would adversely affect ChargePoint’s financial results.
The U.S. federal government, foreign governments and some state and local governments provide incentives to end users and purchasers of EVs and EV charging stations in the form of rebates, tax credits and regulations like clean fuel programs, which can provide other financial incentives. The EV market benefits from these governmental rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives to significantly lower the effective price of EVs and EV charging stations to customers. For example, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act signed into law on November 15, 2021 provided additional funding for EVs and EV charging infrastructure through the creation of new programs and grants and the expansion of existing programs, including $7.5 billion for EV charging along highway corridors. In addition, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 signed into law on August 16, 2022 includes numerous incentives and tax credits aimed at reducing the effects of climate change, such as the extension of EV charging infrastructure tax credits under Section 30C and tax credits for EVs under Section 30D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) through 2032. However, these incentives may expire on a particular date, end when the allocated funding is exhausted, or be reduced or terminated as a matter of regulatory or legislative policy. Any other reduction in rebates, tax credits or other financial incentives for EVs or EV charging stations could materially reduce the demand for EVs and ChargePoint’s solutions and, as a result, may adversely impact ChargePoint’s business and expansion potential.
24

ChargePoint also derives other revenue as set forth on its consolidated statements of operations from regulatory credits. If government support of these credits declines, ChargePoint’s ability to generate this other revenue in the future would be adversely affected. In years prior to fiscal year 2021, ChargePoint has derived a slight majority of its other revenue from regulatory credits. However, revenue from this source as a percentage of other and total revenue has declined in recent quarters and it may continue to decline over time. Further, the availability of such credits may decline even with general governmental support of the transition to EV infrastructure.
Changes to fuel economy standards or the success of alternative fuels may negatively impact the EV market and thus the demand for ChargePoint’s products and services.
As regulations have required an increase in the mileage capabilities of cars, consumption of renewable transportation fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, and the prevalence of other alternative vehicles has been increasing. If fuel efficiency of non-electric vehicles continues to rise, whether as the result of regulations or otherwise, and affordability of vehicles using renewable transportation fuels improves, the demand for electric vehicles could diminish. In addition, the EV fueling model is different than gas or other fuel models, requiring behavior change and education of influencers, consumers and others such as regulatory bodies. Developments in alternative technologies, such as advanced diesel, ethanol, fuel cells or compressed natural gas, or improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine, may materially and adversely affect demand for EVs and EV charging stations. For example, fuel which is abundant and relatively inexpensive in the United States, such as compressed natural gas, may emerge as a preferred alternative to petroleum-based propulsion. Regulatory bodies may also adopt rules that substantially favor certain alternatives to petroleum-based propulsion over others, which may not necessarily be EVs, or may adopt rules to eliminate, modify or reduce penalties or incentives to maintain minimum fuel economy standards. Any of these changes may impose additional obstacles to the purchase of EVs or the development of a more ubiquitous EV market. If any of the above influence consumers or businesses to no longer purchase EVs or purchase them at a lower rate, it would materially and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
The EV charging market is characterized by rapid technological changes often due to technical improvements, regulatory requirements and customer requirements, which requires ChargePoint to continue to develop new products and product innovations. Any delays in such development could adversely affect market adoption of its products and ChargePoint’s financial results.
Continuing technological changes in battery and other EV technologies could adversely affect adoption of current EV charging technology and/or ChargePoint’s products. ChargePoint’s future success will depend upon its ability to develop and introduce a variety of new capabilities and innovations to its existing product offerings, as well as introduce a variety of new product offerings, to address the changing needs of the EV charging market. As new products are introduced, gross margins tend to decline in the near term and improve as the product becomes more mature with a more efficient manufacturing process.
As EV technologies change or governmental regulations impose new requirements on EV charging technology, ChargePoint may need to upgrade or adapt its charging station technology and introduce new products and services in order to serve vehicles that have the latest technology, in particular battery cell technology, or comply with new governmental regulations, which could involve substantial costs. Even if ChargePoint is able to keep pace with changes in technology and develop new products and services, its research and development expenses could increase, its gross margins could be adversely affected in some periods and its prior products could become obsolete or non-compliant with governmental regulations more quickly than expected. ChargePoint may also incur additional costs and expenses related to new product transitions such as adverse impacts due to supply chain failures to procure sufficient new product components, purchase price variances, or inventory obsolescence costs related to new product transitions, including as the result of any failure on the part of ChargePoint to meet its own estimates and projections. ChargePoint cannot guarantee that any new products will be released in a timely manner, or at all, or achieve market acceptance. Delays in delivering new products that meet customer requirements could damage ChargePoint’s relationships with customers and lead them to seek alternative providers. Delays in introducing products and innovations or the failure to offer innovative products or services at competitive prices may cause existing and potential customers to purchase ChargePoint’s competitors’ products or services. Finally, new or changing state or federal regulations may result in delays related to the development of new products or modifications to existing products in order to come into compliance and any such delays may result in customer’s selecting alternative providers or result in delays related to ChargePoint’s ability to install, sell or distribute its charging station technology.
If ChargePoint is unable to devote adequate resources to develop products or cannot otherwise successfully develop products or services that meet customer and regulatory requirements on a timely basis or that remain competitive with technological alternatives, its products and services could lose market share, its revenue may decline, it may experience higher operating losses and its business and prospects may be adversely affected.
Certain statements ChargePoint makes about estimates of market opportunity and forecasts of market growth may prove to be inaccurate.
From time to time, ChargePoint makes statements with estimates of the addressable market for ChargePoint’s solutions and the EV market in general. Market opportunity estimates and growth forecasts, whether obtained from third-party sources or developed internally, are subject to significant uncertainty and are based on assumptions and estimates that may prove to be inaccurate. This is especially so at the present time due to the uncertainties associated with worldwide supply chain disruptions, macroeconomic effects of inflation, rising interest rates, adverse conditions in the financial services industry and market and geopolitical volatility. The estimates and forecasts relating to the size and expected growth of the target business. NoneEV market, market demand and adoption, capacity to address this
25

demand and pricing may also prove to be inaccurate. In particular, estimates regarding the current and projected EV market opportunity are difficult to predict. The estimated addressable EV market may not materialize for many years, if ever, and even if the markets meet the size estimates and growth forecasts, ChargePoint’s business could fail to grow at similar rates.
Risks Related to ChargePoint’s Technology, Intellectual Property and Infrastructure
ChargePoint’s business may be adversely affected if it is unable to protect its technology and intellectual property from unauthorized use by third parties.
ChargePoint’s success depends, at least in part, on ChargePoint’s ability to obtain, maintain, enforce and protect its core technology and intellectual property. To accomplish this, ChargePoint relies on, and plans to continue relying on, a combination of patents, trade secrets (including know-how), employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements, copyright, trademarks, intellectual property licenses and other contractual rights to retain ownership of, and protect, its technology. Despite ChargePoint’s efforts to obtain, maintain, enforce and protect intellectual property rights, there can be no assurance that these steps will be available in all cases or stockholderswill be adequate to prevent ChargePoint’s competitors or other third-parties from copying, reverse engineering, or otherwise obtaining and using its technology or products or seeking court declarations that they do not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate its intellectual property. Failure to adequately protect its technology and intellectual property could result in competitors offering similar products, potentially resulting in the loss of some of ChargePoint’s competitive advantage and a decrease in revenue which would adversely affect its business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
The measures ChargePoint takes to protect its technology intellectual property from unauthorized use by others may not be effective for various reasons, including the following:
any patent applications ChargePoint submits may not result in the issuance of patents;
the scope of issued patents may not be broad enough to protect its inventions and proprietary rights;
any issued patents may be challenged by competitors and/or invalidated by courts or governmental authorities;
ChargePoint may not be the first inventor of the subject matter to which it has filed a particular patent application, and it may not be the first party to file such a patent application;
Patents have a finite term, and competitors and other third-parties may offer identical or similar products after the expiration of ChargePoint’s patents that cover such products;
the costs associated with enforcing patents, confidentiality and invention agreements or other intellectual property rights may make aggressive enforcement impracticable;
current and future competitors may circumvent patents or independently develop similar trade secrets or works of authorship, such as software;
know-how and other proprietary information ChargePoint purports to hold as a trade secret may not qualify as a trade secret under applicable laws;
ChargePoint’s employees, contractors or business partners may breach their confidentiality, non-disclosure, and non-use obligations; and
proprietary designs and technology embodied in ChargePoint’s products may be discoverable by third-parties through means that do not constitute violations of applicable laws.
Patent, trademark, and trade secret laws vary significantly throughout the world. Some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Further, policing the unauthorized use of ChargePoint’s intellectual property in foreign jurisdictions may be difficult or impossible. Therefore, ChargePoint’s intellectual property rights may not be as strong or as easily enforced outside of the United States.
Certain patents in the EV space may come to be considered “standards essential.” If this is the case with respect to any of ChargePoint’s patents, it may be required to provide any financinglicense certain technology on “fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory” terms, decreasing revenue. Further, competitors, vendors, or customers may, in certain instances, be free to uscreate variations or derivative works of ChargePoint technology and intellectual property, and those derivative works may become directly competitive with ChargePoint’s offerings. Finally, ChargePoint may not be able to leverage, or obtain ownership of, all technology and intellectual property developed by ChargePoint’s vendors in connection with or after our business combination.

Our initial stockholders will control the electiondesign and manufacture of our board of directors until consummation of our initial business combinationChargePoint’s products, thereby jeopardizing ChargePoint’s ability to obtain a competitive advantage over its competitors.

It is ChargePoint’s policy to enter into confidentiality and will hold a substantial interest in us. As a result, they will elect all of our directors prior to our initial business combinationinvention assignment agreements with its employees and contractors that have developed material intellectual property for ChargePoint, but these agreements may not be self-executing and may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentially in a mannernot
26

otherwise adequately protect ChargePoint’s intellectual property, particularly with respect to conflicts of ownership relating to work product generated by employees and contractors. Furthermore, ChargePoint cannot be certain that you do not support.

Our initial stockholders own shares representing 20.3% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, the Founder Shares, all of which are held by our initial stockholders, will entitle the holders to elect all of our directors prior to our initial business combination. Holders of our public shares will have no right to vote on the election of directors during such time. These provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may only be amended by a majority of at least 90% of our common stock voting at a stockholder meeting. As a result, youthese agreements will not have any influence overbe breached, and that third-parties will not gain access to its trade secrets, know-how and other proprietary technology. Third-parties may also independently develop the electionsame or substantially similar proprietary technology. Monitoring unauthorized use of directors priorChargePoint’s intellectual property is difficult and costly, as are the steps ChargePoint has taken or will take to our initial business combination. Accordingly, our initial stockholdersprevent misappropriation.

To prevent unauthorized use of ChargePoint’s intellectual property, it may exert a substantial influence onbe necessary to prosecute actions requiring a stockholder vote, potentiallyfor infringement, misappropriation or other violation of ChargePoint’s intellectual property against third-parties. Any such action could result in a mannersignificant costs and diversion of ChargePoint’s resources and management’s attention, and there can be no assurance that you do not support, including amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and approval of major corporate transactions. In addition, our board of directors, whose members were elected by our initial stockholders, is andChargePoint will be divided into three classes, eachsuccessful in any such action. Furthermore, many of which will generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being elected in each year. We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders to elect new directors prior to the completion of our business combination, in which case all of theChargePoint’s current directors will continue in office until at least the completion of the business combination. If there is an annual meeting, as a consequence of our “staggered” board of directors, only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for election and our initial stockholders, because of their ownership position, will have considerable influence regarding the outcome. Accordingly, our initial stockholders will continue to exert control at least until the completion of our business combination.


We may amend the terms of the Warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of Warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Warrants (or, if applicable, 65% of the then-outstanding Warrants and 65% of the then-outstanding Private Placement Warrants, voting as separate classes). As a result, the exercise price of your Warrants could be increased, the Warrant could be converted into cash or stock (at a ratio different than initially provided), the exercise period could be shortened and the number of shares of our Class A common stock purchasable upon exercise of a Warrant could be decreased, all without your approval.

The Warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the Warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Warrants to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of the Warrants. If an amendment adversely affects the Private Placement Warrants in a different manner than the Warrants or vice versa, then approval of holders of at least 65% of the then-outstanding Warrants and 65% of the then-outstanding Private Placement Warrants, voting as separate classes, will be required. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the Warrants in a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Warrants (or, if applicable, 65% of the then-outstanding Warrants and 65% of the then-outstanding Private Placement Warrants, voting as separate classes) approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the Warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Warrants (or, if applicable, 65% of the then-outstanding Warrants and 65% of the then-outstanding Private Placement Warrants, voting as separate classes) is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or stock (at a ratio different than initially provided), shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of shares of our Class A common stock purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.

We may redeem your unexpired Warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your Warrants worthless.

Wepotential competitors have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants at anydedicate substantially greater resources to enforce their intellectual property rights than ChargePoint does. Accordingly, ChargePoint may not be able to prevent third-parties from infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating its intellectual property. Any of the foregoing may adversely affect ChargePoint’s revenues or results of operations.

ChargePoint expects to incur research and development costs and devote significant resources to developing new products, which could significantly reduce its profitability and may never result in revenue to ChargePoint.
ChargePoint’s future growth depends on penetrating new markets, adapting existing products to new applications and customer requirements, and introducing new products that achieve market acceptance. ChargePoint plans to incur significant research and development costs in the future as part of its efforts to design, develop, manufacture and introduce new products and enhance existing products. ChargePoint’s research and development expenses were $195.0 million, $145.0 million, and $75.0 million during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and are likely to grow in the future. Further, ChargePoint’s research and development program may not produce successful results, and its new products may not achieve market acceptance, create additional revenue or become profitable.
ChargePoint may need to defend against intellectual property infringement or misappropriation claims, which may be time-consuming and expensive.
From time after they become exercisableto time, the holders of intellectual property rights may assert their rights and priorurge ChargePoint to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the last reported sales price of our Class A common stock equals enter into licenses, and/or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which we give proper noticemay bring suits alleging infringement, misappropriation or other violation of such redemptionrights. There can be no assurance that ChargePoint will be able to mitigate the risk of potential suits or other legal demands by competitors or other third-parties. Accordingly, ChargePoint may consider entering into licensing agreements with respect to such rights, although no assurance can be given that such licenses can be obtained on acceptable terms or that litigation will not occur, and provided certain other conditions are met. Ifsuch licenses and when the Warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right evenassociated litigation could significantly increase ChargePoint’s operating expenses. In addition, if we are unableChargePoint is determined to registerhave or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding Warrants could force you (i) to exercise your Warrants and pay the exercise price therefor atbelieves there is a time whenhigh likelihood that it has infringed upon, misappropriated or otherwise violated a third-party’s intellectual property rights, it may be disadvantageousrequired to cease making, selling or incorporating certain key components or intellectual property into the products and services it offers, to pay substantial damages and/or royalties, to redesign its products and services, and/or to establish and maintain alternative branding. In addition, to the extent that ChargePoint’s customers and business partners become the subject of any allegation or claim regarding the infringement, misappropriation or other violation of intellectual property rights related to ChargePoint’s products and services, ChargePoint may be required to indemnify such customers and business partners. If ChargePoint were required to take one or more such actions, its business, prospects, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, any litigation or claims, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs, negative publicity and diversion of resources and management attention.
The current lack of international standards may lead to uncertainty, additional competition and further unexpected costs.
Lack of industry standards for youEV station management, coupled with utilities and other large organizations mandating their own adoption of specifications that have not become widely adopted in the industry, may hinder innovation or slow new product or new feature introduction.
In addition, automobile manufacturers may choose to do so, (ii)utilize their own proprietary systems, which could lock out competition for EV charging stations, or to sell your Warrants atuse their size and market position to influence the then-current market, price when you might otherwise wishwhich could limit ChargePoint’s market and reach to customers, negatively impacting its business.
Further, should regulatory bodies later impose a standard that is not compatible with ChargePoint’s infrastructure, it may incur significant costs to adapt its business model to the new regulatory standard, which may require significant time and, as a result, may have a material and adverse effect on its revenue or results of operations.
ChargePoint’s technology could have undetected defects, errors or bugs in hardware or software which could reduce market adoption, damage its reputation with current or prospective customers, and/or expose it to product liability and other claims that could materially and adversely affect its business.
ChargePoint may be subject to claims that charging stations have malfunctioned and persons were injured or purported to be injured. Any insurance that ChargePoint carries may not be sufficient or it may not apply to all situations. Similarly, to the extent that such malfunctions are related to components obtained from third-party vendors, such vendors may not assume responsibility for such
27

malfunctions. In addition, ChargePoint’s customers could be subjected to claims as a result of such incidents and may bring legal claims against ChargePoint to attempt to hold your Warrantsit liable. Any of these events could adversely affect ChargePoint’s brand, relationships with customers, operating results or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding Warrants are calledfinancial condition.
Furthermore, ChargePoint’s software platform is complex, developed for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your Warrants. None of the Private Placement Warrants will be redeemableover a decade by us for cash so long as they are held by our Sponsor or its permitted transferees.

In addition, we may redeem your Warrants after they become exercisable formany developers, and includes a number of shares of Class A common stock determined based on the redemption datelicensed third-party commercial and the fair market value of our Class A common stock. Any such redemptionopen-source software libraries. ChargePoint’s software has contained defects and errors and may have similar consequences to a cash redemption described above. In addition, such redemption may occur at a time when the Warrants are “out-of-the-money,” in which case you would lose any potential embedded value from a subsequent increase in the valuefuture contain undetected defects or errors. ChargePoint is continuing to evolve the features and functionality of the Class A common stock had your Warrants remained outstanding.


Our ability to require holders of our Warrants to exercise such Warrants on a cashless basis after we call the Warrants for redemptionits platform through updates and enhancements, and as it does, it may introduce additional defects or if there is no effective registration statement covering the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of these Warrants will cause holders to receive fewer shares of Class A common stock upon their exercise of the Warrants than they would have received had they been able to pay the exercise price of their Warrants in cash.

If our shares of Class A common stock are at the time of any exercise of a Warrant not listed on a national securities exchange sucherrors that our shares of Class A common stock satisfy the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may at our option, require holders of Warrants who exercise their Warrants to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be requireddetected until after deployment to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, but we will be required to use our best efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. “Cashless exercise” means the warrantholder pays the exercise price by giving up some of the shares for which the Warrant is being exercised, with those shares valued at the then-current market price. Accordingly, each holder would pay the exercise price by surrendering the exercised Warrants in exchange for the issuance of that number of shares of Class A common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of shares of Class A common stock underlying the exercised Warrants, multiplied by the difference between the exercise price of the Warrants and the “fair market value” by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” shall mean the average reported last sale price of the Class A common stock for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of the Warrants.

customers. In addition, if a registration statement coveringChargePoint’s products and services, including any updates or patches, are not implemented or used correctly or as intended, inadequate performance and disruptions in service may result.

Any defects or errors in product or services offerings, or the sharesperception of Class A common stock issuable upon exercisesuch defects or errors, or other performance problems could result in any of the Warrants is not effective within a specified period following, the consummationeach of our initialwhich could adversely affect ChargePoint’s business combination, warrantholders may, until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when we shall have failedresults of its operations:
expenditure of significant financial and product development resources, including recalls, in efforts to maintain an effective registration statement, exercise Warrants on a cashless basis. For purposesanalyze, correct, eliminate or work around errors or defects;
loss of calculating the number of shares issuable upon such cashless exercise, the “fairexisting or potential customers or partners;
interruptions or delays in sales;
delayed or lost revenue;
delay or failure to attain market value” shall mean the volume weighted average price of the Class A common stock for the 10 trading day period ending on the trading day prior to the date on which notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent.

If we choose to require holders to exercise their Warrants on a cashless basis, which we may do at our sole discretion, or if holders elect to do so when there is no effective registration statement, the number of shares of Class A common stock received by a holder upon exercise will be fewer than it would have been had such holder exercised his or her warrant for cash. This will have the effect of reducing the potential “upside” of the holder’s investmentacceptance;

delay in the Company becausedevelopment or release of new functionality or improvements;
negative publicity and reputational harm;
sales credits or refunds;
exposure of confidential or proprietary information;
diversion of development and customer service resources;
breach of warranty claims;
legal claims under applicable laws, rules and regulations; and
an increase in collection cycles for accounts receivable or the warrantholder will holdexpense and risk of litigation.
Although ChargePoint has contractual protections, such as warranty disclaimers and limitation of liability provisions, in many of its agreements with customers, resellers and other business partners, such protections may not be uniformly implemented in all contracts and, where implemented, may not fully or effectively protect it from claims by customers, resellers, business partners or other third-parties. Any insurance coverage or indemnification obligations of suppliers may not adequately cover all such claims or cover only a smaller numberportion of shares of Classsuch claims. A common stock upon a cashless exercise of the warrants they hold.

Our warrants and Founder Shares maysuccessful product liability, warranty, or other similar claim could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, even claims that ultimately are unsuccessful could result in expenditure of funds in litigation, divert management’s time and other resources and cause reputational harm.

Some of ChargePoint’s products contain open-source software, which may pose particular risks to its proprietary software, products and services in a manner that could harm its business.
ChargePoint uses open-source software in its products and anticipates using open-source software in the market price of our Class A common stock and make it more difficult to effectuate our business combination.

We issued Warrants to purchase 10,470,587 shares of Class A common stockfuture. Some open-source software licenses require those who distribute open-source software as part of their own software product to publicly disclose all or part of the Units. We also issued 5,521,568 Private Placement Warrants, each exercisablesource code to purchase one sharesuch software product or to make available any derivative works of Class A common stockthe open-source code on unfavorable terms or at $11.50 per share. Our initial stockholders currently own an aggregate of 7,852,941 Founder Shares. The Founder Shares are convertible into shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis,no cost, and ChargePoint may be subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizationssuch terms. The terms of many open-source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts, and the like. there is a risk that open source software licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on ChargePoint’s ability to provide or distribute ChargePoint’s products or services.

In addition, if our Sponsor makes any working capital loans, itChargePoint relies on some open-source software and libraries issued under the General Public License (or similar “copyleft” licenses) for development of its products and may convert those loans into upcontinue to an additional 1,000,000 Private Placement Warrants, at the pricerely on similar copyleft licenses. Third-parties may assert a copyright claim against ChargePoint regarding its use of $1.50 per warrant. To the extent we issue shares of Class A common stock to effectuate a business combination, the potential for the issuance of a substantial number of additional shares of Class A common stock upon exercise of these warrants and conversion rightssuch software or libraries, which could make us a less attractive acquisition vehiclelead to a target business. Anylimitation of ChargePoint’s use of such issuance will increasesoftware or libraries. Use of such software or libraries may also force ChargePoint to provide third-parties, at no cost, the numbersource code to its proprietary software, which may decrease revenue and lessen any competitive advantage ChargePoint has due to the secrecy of issued and outstanding sharesits source code.
28

ChargePoint could face claims from third-parties claiming ownership of, or demanding release of, the sharesopen-source software or derivative works that ChargePoint developed using such software, which could include ChargePoint’s proprietary source code, or otherwise seeking to enforce the terms of Class A common stock issuedthe applicable open-source license. These claims could result in litigation and could require ChargePoint to make its software source code freely available, purchase a costly license or cease offering the implicated products or services unless and until ChargePoint can re-engineer them to avoid infringement, which may be a costly and time-consuming process, and ChargePoint may not be able to complete the re-engineering process successfully.
Additionally, the use of certain open-source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open-source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of software. There is typically no support available for open-source software, and ChargePoint cannot ensure that the authors of such open-source software will implement or push updates to address security risks or will not abandon further development and maintenance. Many of the risks associated with the use of open-source software, such as the lack of warranties or assurances of title or performance, cannot be eliminated, and could, if not properly addressed, have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s business combination. Therefore, our warrants and Founder Sharesresults.
Interruptions, delays in service or inability to increase capacity, including internationally, at third-party data center facilities could impair the use or functionality of ChargePoint’s subscription services, harm its business and subject it to liability.
ChargePoint currently serves customers from third-party data center facilities operated by Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) located in the United States, Europe and Canada. Any outage or failure of such data centers could negatively affect ChargePoint’s product connectivity and performance. ChargePoint’s primary environments are behind the Content Delivery Network operated by Cloudflare, Inc. (“Cloudflare”), and any interruptions of Cloudflare’s services could negatively affect ChargePoint’s product connectivity and performance. Furthermore, ChargePoint depends on connectivity from its charging stations to its data centers through cellular service providers, such as Verizon. Any incident affecting a data center facility’s or a cellular service provider’s infrastructure or operations, whether caused by fire, flood, severe storm, earthquake, or other natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, breach of security protocols, computer viruses and disabling devices, failure of access control mechanisms, war, criminal act, military actions, terrorist attacks and other similar events could negatively affect the use, functionality or availability of ChargePoint’s services.
Any damage to, or failure of, ChargePoint’s systems, or those of its third-party providers, could interrupt or hinder the use or functionality of its services. Impairment of or interruptions in ChargePoint’s services may makereduce revenue, subject it more difficult to effectuate aclaims and litigation, cause customers to terminate their subscriptions, and adversely affect renewal rates and its ability to attract new customers. ChargePoint’s business combination or increase the cost of acquiring the target business.

Because each Unit contains one-third of one Warrantwill also be harmed if customers and only a whole Warrantpotential customers believe its products and services are unreliable.

Customer-Related Risks
ChargePoint may be exercised, the Unitsunable to leverage customer data in all geographic locations, and this limitation may be worth less than units of other blank check companies.

Each Unit contains one-third of one Warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, no fractional Warrants will be issued upon separation of the Units,impact research and only whole Warrants will trade. This is different from other blank check companies similar to ours whose units include one share of common stockdevelopment operations.

ChargePoint relies on data collected through charging stations or its mobile application, including usage data and one warrant to purchase one whole share. We have established the components of the Units ingeolocation data. ChargePoint uses this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the Warrants upon completion of a business combination since the Warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-third of the number of shares compared to units that each contain a whole warrant to purchase one share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger partner for target businesses. Nevertheless, this Unit structure may cause our Units to be worth less than if they included a warrant to purchase one whole share.

A provision of our warrant agreement may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination.

Unlike most blank check companies, if we issue additional shares of common stock or equity-linked securities for capital raising purposesdata in connection with the closingresearch, development and analysis of our initialits technologies. ChargePoint’s inability to obtain necessary rights to use this data or freely transfer this data out of, for example, the European Economic Area, could result in delays or otherwise negatively impact ChargePoint’s research and development efforts.

ChargePoint’s ability to maintain customer satisfaction depends in part on the quality of ChargePoint’s customer support. Failure to maintain high-quality customer support could adversely affect ChargePoint’s reputation, business, combination atresults of operation, and financial condition.
ChargePoint believes that the successful use of its EV charging stations and Cloud Services requires a newly issued pricehigh level of less than $9.20 per sharesupport and engagement for many of common stock, then the exercise price of the warrants will be adjustedits customers, particularly its fleet and commercial customers. In order to equal 115% of the newly issued price. This may make it more difficult for usdeliver appropriate customer support and engagement, ChargePoint must successfully assist its customers in deploying and continuing to consummate an initial business combinationuse ChargePoint’s Cloud Services tools and EV charging stations, resolving performance issues, addressing interoperability challenges with a target business.

customers’ existing information technology or fuel management platforms and responding to EV charging station component failures or replacement parts, as well as charging station performance and reliability issues that may arise from time to time.

Because we must furnish our stockholdersChargePoint provides support to its commercial, fleet and residential EV charging station owners and operators. Such support services are generally provided under its Assure warranty program, including proactive charging station monitoring, guaranteed service response times and labor and parts warranties. ChargePoint further provides support for EV drivers connecting to and utilizing ChargePoint’s Cloud Services and its network of EV charging stations, including customer support services and mobile services. ChargePoint’s support organization faces additional challenges associated with targetits international operations, including those associated with delivering support, training, and documentation in languages other than English. Failure to maintain high-quality customer support could adversely affect ChargePoint’s reputation, business, results of operations, and financial statements, we may lose the abilitycondition.

In addition to complete an otherwise advantageous initial business combination withproviding direct customer support, ChargePoint also relies on channel partners in order to provide frontline support to some prospective target businesses.

The federal proxy rules require that a proxy statementof its customers, including with respect to commissioning, maintenance, component part replacements and repairs of charging stations. If ChargePoint’s channel partners do not provide support to the satisfaction of ChargePoint’s customers, ChargePoint may be

29

required to hire additional personnel and to invest in additional resources in order to provide an adequate level of support, generally at a votehigher cost than that associated with its channel partners, which may increase ChargePoint’s costs and expenses and adversely affect ChargePoint’s gross margins. There can be no assurance that ChargePoint will be able to hire sufficient support personnel as and when needed. To the extent that ChargePoint is unsuccessful in hiring, training, and retaining adequate support personnel, its ability to provide high-quality and timely support to its customers will be negatively impacted and its customers’ satisfaction with its Cloud Services and EV charging stations could be adversely affected. Any failure to maintain high-quality customer support, or a market perception that ChargePoint does not maintain high-quality customer support, could adversely affect ChargePoint’s reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition, particularly with respect to its fleet customers (see also “Risks Related to ChargePoint’s Business-- Supply chain disruptions, component shortages, manufacturing interruptions or delays, or the failure to accurately forecast customer demand, could adversely affect ChargePoint’s ability to meet customer demand, lead to higher costs, and adversely affect ChargePoint’s business and results of operations. For example, supply chain challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and global chip shortages have impacted companies worldwide and may have adverse effects on ChargePoint’s suppliers and customers and, as a result, ChargePoint”).
ChargePoint’s business combination meeting certain financial significance tests include target historical and/will depend on customers renewing their services subscriptions. If customers do not continue to use its subscription offerings or pro forma financial statement disclosure. Weif they fail to add more stations, its business and operating results will includebe adversely affected.
In addition to selling charging station hardware, ChargePoint also depends on customers continuing to subscribe to its EV charging services and extended warranty coverages. Therefore, it is important that customers renew their subscriptions when the contract term expires and add additional charging stations and services to their subscriptions. Customers may decide not to renew their subscriptions with a similar contract period, at the same financial statement disclosure in connection with our tender offer documents, whetherprices or not they are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance with,terms or be reconciled to, GAAP or IFRS, depending on the circumstances, and the historical financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standardssame or a greater number of the PCAOB. These financial statement requirementsusers, stations or level of functionality. Customer retention may limit the pool of potential target businesses we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such financial statements in time for us to disclose such financial statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame.

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.

We are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an emerging growth company until the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our Public Offering, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our Class A common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractivedecline or fluctuate as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading pricesa number of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securitiesfactors, including satisfaction with software and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.

Further, Section 102(b)(1)features, functionality of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companiescharging stations, prices, features and pricing of competing products, reductions in spending levels, mergers and acquisitions involving customers and deteriorating general economic conditions.

If customers do not renew their subscriptions, if they renew on terms less favorable to ChargePoint or if they fail to add products or services, ChargePoint’s business and operating results will be adversely affected.
Changes in subscriptions or pricing models may not be reflected in near-term operating results.
ChargePoint generally recognizes subscriptions revenue from beingcustomers ratably over the terms of their contracts. As a result, most of the subscriptions revenue reported in each quarter is derived from the recognition of deferred revenue relating to subscriptions entered into during previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in new or renewed subscriptions in any single quarter will likely have only a small impact on revenue for that quarter. However, such a decline will negatively affect revenue in future quarters. In addition, the severity and duration of events may not be predictable, and their effects could extend beyond a single quarter. Accordingly, the effect of significant downturns in sales and market acceptance of subscription services, and potential changes in pricing policies or rate of renewals, may not be fully apparent until future periods.
Financial, Tax and Accounting-Related Risks
ChargePoint has identified, and has previously identified, material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint is unable to remediate these material weaknesses, or if ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations.
As a public company, ChargePoint is required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are requiredprovide management’s attestation on internal controls pursuant to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accountant standards used.


Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate our business combination, require substantial financial and management resources, and increase the time and costs of completing our initial business combination.

Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley. The standards required for a public company under Section 404(a) and Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley are significantly more stringent than those previously required of ChargePoint as a privately-held company. Management may not be able to effectively and timely implement controls and procedures that adequately respond to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiresincreased regulatory compliance and reporting requirements of Section 404(a) and/or Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley. If ChargePoint is not able to implement these additional requirements in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, it may not be able to assess whether its internal control over financial reporting is effective, which may subject it to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence.

In connection with the preparation and audit of ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements, material weaknesses were identified in its internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2023. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that we evaluatethere is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of ChargePoint’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
ChargePoint did not design and reportmaintain effective controls over certain information technology (“IT”) general controls for information systems that are relevant to the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Specifically, ChargePoint did not design and maintain (a) program change management controls to ensure that IT program and data changes affecting financial IT applications and underlying accounting records are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately, (b) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and that adequately restrict user and privileged access to its financial applications and data to
30

appropriate company personnel and (c) testing and approval controls for program development to ensure that new software development is aligned with business and IT requirements. The IT deficiencies did not result in any misstatements to the consolidated financial statements, however, the deficiencies, when aggregated, could impact maintaining effective segregation of duties, as well as the effectiveness of IT-dependent controls (such as automated controls that address the risk of material misstatement to one or more assertions, along with the IT controls and underlying data that support the effectiveness of system-generated data and reports) that could result in misstatements potentially impacting all financial statement accounts and disclosures that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, ChargePoint management has determined these deficiencies in the aggregate constitute a material weakness. In addition, ChargePoint separately did not design and maintain effective controls over segregation of duties.
ChargePoint has continued implementation of a plan to remediate these material weaknesses and remediation efforts could continue beyond the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024. These remediation measures are ongoing and include engaging an external advisor to assist with evaluating and documenting the design and operating effectiveness of IT general controls and assisting with the remediation of deficiencies, as necessary, designing and implementing controls over segregation of duties, and designing and implementing IT general controls, including controls over program change management, the provisioning and monitoring of user access rights and privileges and program development processes and procedures. At this time, ChargePoint cannot provide an estimate of costs expected to be incurred in connection with implementing this remediation plan, however, these remediation measures will be time consuming, will result in ChargePoint incurring significant costs, and will place significant demands on our systemits financial and operational resources. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of its internal controls beginning with ourcontrol over financial reporting, ChargePoint has expended, and will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.
In addition, as previously disclosed in ChargePoint’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending Decemberended January 31, 2020. Only2022, management concluded the following material weaknesses existed in the event we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer will we be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on ourChargePoint’s internal control over financial reporting. Further,reporting: ChargePoint did not design and maintain an effective control environment commensurate with its financial reporting requirements, specifically, ChargePoint did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate degree of accounting knowledge, experience and training to appropriately analyze, record and disclose accounting matters commensurate with its accounting and reporting requirements; ChargePoint did not design and maintain formal accounting policies, procedures and controls over significant accounts and disclosures to achieve complete, accurate and timely financial accounting, reporting and disclosures, including accounting for complex features associated with warrants, and adequate controls related to the preparation and review of journal entries; and ChargePoint did not design and maintain effective controls related to the valuation of acquired intangible assets, specifically controls over the review of the inputs and assumptions used in the valuation of the acquired assets.
The material weakness related to formal accounting policies, procedures and controls resulted in adjustments to several accounts and disclosures related to the Legacy ChargePoint consolidated financial statements for the years ended January 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. The material weakness related to the accounting for complex features associated with warrants resulted in the restatement of the previously issued financial statements of the entity acquired as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be requiredpart of the Merger Agreement related to complywarrant liabilities and equity. The material weakness related to the valuation of acquired intangible assets resulted in material adjustments to customer relationships and goodwill and related disclosures in ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2022. In connection with the independent registeredfiscal year ended January 31, 2023, ChargePoint’s management has completed its documentation, testing and evaluation of newly designed and enhanced control activities related to formal accounting policies, procedures and controls, related to accounting for complex features associated with warrants, and related to the valuation of acquired intangible assets and determined that, as of January 31, 2023, these control activities have been appropriately designed and implemented, and have operated effectively for a sufficient period of time to conclude that these previously identified material weaknesses have been remediated.
The process of designing and implementing an effective financial reporting system is a continuous effort that requires ChargePoint to anticipate and react to changes in its business, to economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a financial reporting system that satisfies its reporting obligations. ChargePoint may be unable to meet the reporting demands as a public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. The fact that we are a blank check company, makes compliance withincluding the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome for usof 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), and may be unable to accurately report its financial results, or report them within the timeframes required by law or stock exchange regulations. Failure to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley, when and as comparedapplicable, could also potentially subject ChargePoint to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other public companies becauseregulatory authorities. Any failure to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or any difficulties ChargePoint encounters in their implementation, could result in additional material weaknesses, cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in its financial statements. Furthermore, if ChargePoint cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent material misstatements due to fraud or error, its business and results of operations could be harmed, and investors could lose confidence in its reported financial information. ChargePoint can give no assurance that any additional material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a target business with which we seekfailure to complete our business combinationimplement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or any circumvention of these controls. In addition, even if ChargePoint is successful in strengthening its internal controls and procedures, in the future those internal controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or sufficiently identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of ChargePoint’s financial statements.
ChargePoint’s financial condition and results of operations are likely to fluctuate on a quarterly basis in future periods, which could cause its results for a particular period to fall below expectations, resulting in a decline in the price of its Common Stock.
ChargePoint’s financial condition and results of operations have fluctuated in the past and may continue to fluctuate in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond its control.
31

In addition to the other risks described herein, the following factors could also cause ChargePoint’s financial condition and results of operations to fluctuate on a quarterly basis:
the timing and volume of new sales;
fluctuations in service costs, particularly due to unexpected costs of servicing and maintaining charging stations;
the timing of new product introductions, which can initially have lower gross margins, and inventory obsolescence costs related to new product transitions;
the introduction of new products by competitors, changes in pricing or other factors impacting competition;
weaker than anticipated demand for charging stations, whether due to changes in government incentives and policies or due to other conditions such as decrease in demand or overall economic conditions;
fluctuations in sales and marketing or research and development expenses;
supply chain interruptions, volatility in raw material prices and manufacturing or delivery delays;
the timing and availability of newproducts relative to customers’ and investors’ expectations;
the length of the sales and installation cycle for a particular customer;
disruptions in sales, production, service or other business activities or ChargePoint’s inability to attract and retain qualified personnel; and
unanticipated changes in federal, state, local or foreign government incentive programs, which can affect demand for EVs.
Fluctuations in operating results and cash flow could, among other things, give rise to short-term liquidity issues. In addition, revenue, and other operating results in future quarters may fall short of the expectations of investors and financial analysts, which could have an adverse effect on the price of the Common Stock.
Changes to applicable U.S. tax laws and regulations or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could affect ChargePoint’s business and future profitability.
ChargePoint is a U.S. corporation and thus subject to U.S. corporate income tax on its worldwide operations. Moreover, the majority of ChargePoint’s operations and customers are located in the United States, and as a result, ChargePoint is subject to various U.S. federal, state and local taxes. New U.S. laws and policy relating to taxes may have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s business and future profitability. Further, existing U.S. tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to ChargePoint.
For example, on December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”), was signed into law making significant changes to the Code, and certain provisions of the Tax Act may adversely affect ChargePoint. In particular, sweeping changes were made to the U.S. taxation of foreign operations. Changes include, but are not limited to, a permanent reduction to the corporate income tax rate, limiting interest deductions, a reduction to the maximum deduction allowed for net operating losses generated in tax years after December 31, 2017, the elimination of carrybacks of net operating losses, adopting elements of a territorial tax system, assessing a repatriation tax or “toll-charge” on undistributed earnings and profits of U.S.-owned foreign corporations, and introducing certain anti-base erosion provisions, including a new minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income and base erosion and anti-abuse tax. The Tax Act could be subject to potential amendments and technical corrections, and is subject to interpretations and implementing regulations by the U.S. Treasury and Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), any of which could mitigate or increase certain adverse effects of the legislation. For example, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) modified certain provisions of the Tax Act.
In addition, the Tax Act may impact taxation in non-federal jurisdictions, including with respect to state income taxes as state legislatures respond to the Tax Act, the CARES Act or any newly enacted federal tax legislation. Additionally, other foreign governing bodies have and may enact changes to their tax laws in reaction to the Tax Act, the CARES Act or any newly enacted federal tax legislation that could result in changes to ChargePoint’s global tax position and adversely affect its business and future profitability.
As a result of ChargePoint’s plans to expand operations, including to jurisdictions in which the tax laws may not be favorable, ChargePoint’s tax rate may fluctuate, ChargePoint’s tax obligations may become significantly more complex and subject to greater risk of examination by taxing authorities or ChargePoint may be subject to future changes in tax law, the impacts of which could adversely affect ChargePoint’s after-tax profitability and financial results.
Because ChargePoint does not have a long history of operating at its present scale and it has significant expansion plans, ChargePoint’s effective tax rate may fluctuate in the future. Future effective tax rates could be affected by operating losses in
32

jurisdictions where no tax benefit can be recorded under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), changes in the composition of earnings in countries with differing tax rates, changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws. Factors that could materially affect ChargePoint’s future effective tax rates include, but are not limited to: (a) changes in tax laws or the regulatory environment, (b) changes in accounting and tax standards or practices, (c) changes in the composition of operating income by tax jurisdiction and (d) ChargePoint’s operating results before taxes.
Additionally, ChargePoint’s operations are subject to significant income, withholding and other tax obligations in the United States and may become subject to taxes in numerous additional state, local and non-U.S. jurisdictions with respect to its income, operations and subsidiaries related to those jurisdictions. ChargePoint’s after-tax profitability and financial results could be subject to volatility or be affected by numerous factors, including (a) the availability of tax deductions, credits, exemptions, refunds (including refunds of value added taxes) and other benefits to reduce ChargePoint’s tax liabilities, (b) changes in the valuation of ChargePoint’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, (c) expected timing and amount of the release of any tax valuation allowances, (d) tax treatment of stock-based compensation, (e) changes in the relative amount of ChargePoint’s earnings subject to tax in the various jurisdictions in which ChargePoint operates or has subsidiaries, (f) the potential expansion of ChargePoint’s business into or otherwise becoming subject to tax in additional jurisdictions, (g) changes to ChargePoint’s existing intercompany structure (and any costs related thereto) and business operations, (h) the extent of ChargePoint’s intercompany transactions and the extent to which taxing authorities in the relevant jurisdictions respect those intercompany transactions and (i) ChargePoint’s ability to structure ChargePoint’s operations in an efficient and competitive manner. Due to the complexity of multinational tax obligations and filings, ChargePoint may have a heightened risk related to audits or examinations by U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. taxing authorities. Outcomes from these audits or examinations could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s after-tax profitability and financial condition. Additionally, the IRS and several foreign tax authorities have increasingly focused attention on intercompany transfer pricing with respect to sales of products and services and the use of intangibles. Tax authorities could disagree with ChargePoint’s intercompany charges, cross-jurisdictional transfer pricing or other matters and assess additional taxes. If ChargePoint does not prevail in any such disagreements, its profitability may be affected.
ChargePoint’s after-tax profitability and financial results may also be adversely impacted by changes in the relevant tax laws and tax rates, treaties, regulations, administrative practices and principles, judicial decisions and interpretations thereof, in each case, possibly with retroactive effect. For example, the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting recently entered into force among the jurisdictions that have ratified it, although the United States has not yet entered into this convention. These recent changes could negatively impact ChargePoint’s taxation, especially as ChargePoint expands its relationships and operations internationally.
The ability of ChargePoint to utilize net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is conditioned upon ChargePoint attaining profitability and generating taxable income. ChargePoint has incurred significant net losses since inception and it is anticipated that ChargePoint will continue to incur significant losses. Additionally, ChargePoint’s ability to utilize net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards to offset future taxable income may be limited.
As of January 31, 2023, ChargePoint had $793.1 million of U.S. federal and $371.1 million of California net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income, of which $604.3 million of the U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely. The remaining $188.8 million of U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2028 and the California state net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2029. In addition, ChargePoint had net operating loss carryforwards for other states of $313.8 million, which begin to expire in 2023. The Tax Act included a reduction to the maximum deduction allowed for net operating losses generated in tax years after December 31, 2017 and the elimination of carrybacks of net operating losses. It is possible that ChargePoint will not generate taxable income in time to utilize these net operating loss carryforwards.
In addition, net operating loss carryforwards and certain tax credits may be subject to significant limitations under Section 382 and Section 383 of the Code, respectively, and similar provisions of state law. Under those sections of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset its post-change income or tax may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” will occur if there is a cumulative change in ownership by “5% stockholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. ChargePoint has experienced ownership changes since its incorporation and is already subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its existing net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes to offset taxable income or tax liability. In addition, changes in the ownership of its Common Stock during its fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 and future changes in ChargePoint’s stock ownership, which are outside of ChargePoint’s control, may trigger further ownership changes. Similar provisions of state tax law may also apply to limit ChargePoint’s use of accumulated state tax attributes. As a result, even if ChargePoint earns net taxable income in the future, its ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes accrued prior to these changes in ownership to offset such taxable income or tax liability may be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future income tax liability to ChargePoint.
ChargePoint performed an analysis to assess whether an “ownership change,” as defined by Section 382 of the Code, has occurred from its inception through January 31, 2022. Based on this analysis, ChargePoint has experienced “ownership changes,” limiting the utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards or research and development tax credit carryforwards under Section 382 of the Code by first multiplying the value of the ChargePoint’s stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate, and then applying additional adjustments, as required. As a result of the ownership changes, approximately $17.1 million of Federal net operating loss carryforwards, $17.9 million of California net operating loss carryforwards, and $4.7 million of federal tax
33

credits were determined to have expired unutilized for income tax purposes. ChargePoint’s net operating losses or credits may also be impaired under state law. Accordingly, ChargePoint may not be able to utilize a material portion of the net operating losses or credits. The ability of ChargePoint to utilize its net operating losses or credits is conditioned upon ChargePoint attaining profitability and generating U.S. federal and state taxable income. ChargePoint has incurred significant net losses since inception and will continue to incur significant losses; and therefore, ChargePoint does not know whether or when the combined carryforwards may be or may become subject to limitation by Sections 382 and 383 of the Code.
ChargePoint’s reported financial results may be negatively impacted by changes in U.S. GAAP.
U.S. GAAP is subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification, the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on reported financial results, and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement or effectiveness of a change.
ChargePoint incurs significant increased expenses and administrative burdens as a public company, which could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
ChargePoint faces increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company that it did not incur as a private company. Sarbanes-Oxley, including the requirements of Section 404, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the securities exchanges, impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. Compliance with public company requirements increases costs and make certain activities more time-consuming. A number of those requirements require ChargePoint to carry out activities it has not done previously and additional expenses associated with SEC reporting requirements will continue to be incurred. Furthermore, if any issues in complying with those requirements are identified, such as the material weaknesses as described in this Annual Report and the restatement of ChargePoint’s previously issued consolidated financial statements and related material weakness as described in this Risk Factors section, ChargePoint may be subject to additional costs and expenses to come into compliance (see also “Financial, Tax and Accounting-Related Risks —ChargePoint has identified, and has previously identified, material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If ChargePoint is unable to remediate these material weaknesses, or if ChargePoint identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, this may result in material misstatements contained within ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements or cause ChargePoint to fail to meet its periodic reporting obligations,” and “Risks Related to Legal Matters and Regulations—ChargePoint may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and the restatement of its financial statements,” for more detail). ChargePoint has incurred and could incur additional costs to rectify those or new issues, and the existence of these issues could adversely affect its reputation or investor perceptions. In addition, as a public company, ChargePoint maintains director and officer liability insurance, for which it must pay substantial premiums. The additional reporting and other obligations imposed by rules and regulations applicable to public companies increase legal and financial compliance costs and the costs of related legal, accounting and administrative activities. Advocacy efforts by stockholders and third-parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting requirements, which could further increase costs.
Risks Related to Legal Matters and Regulations
Privacy concerns and laws, or other domestic or foreign regulations, may adversely affect ChargePoint’s business.
ChargePoint relies on data collected through charging stations or its mobile application, including usage data and geolocation data. ChargePoint uses this data in connection with providing its services and the research, development and analysis of its technologies. Accordingly, ChargePoint may be subject to or affected by a number of federal, state, local and international laws and regulations, as well as contractual obligations and industry standards, that impose certain obligations and restrictions with respect to data privacy and security and govern its collection, storage, retention, protection, use, processing, transmission, sharing and disclosure of personal information including that of ChargePoint’s employees, customers, drivers and other third-parties with whom ChargePoint conducts business. National and local governments and agencies in the countries in which ChargePoint operates and in which its customers operate have adopted, are considering adopting, or may adopt laws and regulations regarding the collection, use, storage, processing and disclosure of information regarding consumers and other individuals, which could impact ChargePoint’s ability to offer services in certain jurisdictions. Laws and regulations relating to the collection, use, storage, disclosure, security and other processing of individuals’ information can vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and are particularly stringent in Europe. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, laws, regulations, standards and other obligations relating to privacy, data protection and information security are significant. In addition, some companies, particularly larger enterprises, often will not contract with vendors that do not meet these rigorous standards. Accordingly, the failure, or perceived inability, to comply with these laws, regulations, standards and other obligations may limit the use and adoption of ChargePoint’s solutions, reduce overall demand, lead to regulatory investigations, litigation and significant fines, penalties, injunctions or liabilities for actual or alleged noncompliance, or slow the pace at which it closes sales or other transactions, any of which could harm its business. Moreover, if ChargePoint or any of its employees, contractors or vendors fail or are believed to fail to adhere to appropriate practices regarding customers’ or employees’ data, it may damage its reputation and brand.
Additionally, existing laws, regulations, standards and other obligations may be interpreted in new and differing manners in the future, and may be inconsistent among jurisdictions. Future laws, regulations, standards and other obligations, and changes in the
34

interpretation of existing laws, regulations, standards and other obligations could result in increased regulation, increased costs of compliance and penalties for non-compliance, and limitations on data collection, use, disclosure and transfer for ChargePoint and its customers.
Additionally, the EU adopted the GDPR in 2016, and it became effective in May 2018. The GDPR governs the countries of the European Economic Area and other countries such as Switzerland. The United Kingdom has adopted the UK GDPR which is regulation similar to the GDPR. The GDPR establishes requirements applicable to the handling of personal data and imposes penalties for non-compliance of up to the greater of €20 million or 4% of worldwide revenue. The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, the GDPR and UK GDPR may limit the use and adoption of ChargePoint’s products and services and could have an adverse impact on its business. In addition, California adopted the CCPA and the California State Attorney General has begun enforcement actions. Although ChargePoint initiated a compliance program designed to ensure CCPA compliance after consulting with outside privacy counsel, ChargePoint may remain exposed to ongoing legal risks and compliance costs related to CCPA and the new California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which became effective in most material respects on January 1, 2023. Similar state privacy laws, including those in Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut and Utah create further compliance obligations and risks of fines and penalties in the event of non-compliance. Furthermore, state attorneys general may also join together to file lawsuits based on violations of applicable state privacy acts. In the event ChargePoint is subject to litigation, penalties, or enforcement actions pursuant to the GDPR, CCPA, CPRA or applicable state laws, ChargePoint may be subject to fines and penalties, remediation measures which will divert management’s time and attention, as well as harm to its reputation.
The costs of compliance with, and other burdens imposed by, laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection and information security that are applicable to the businesses of customers may adversely affect the ability and willingness to process, handle, store, use, transmit or process certain types of information, such as demographic and other personal information. The EU and the United States agreed in 2016 to the EU-US Privacy Shield Framework, which provided one mechanism for lawful cross-border transfers of personal data from the EU to the United States. However, the Court of Justice of the EU issued a decision on July 16, 2020 invalidating the EU-US Privacy Shield Framework, thereby creating additional legal risk for ChargePoint. In addition, the other bases ChargePoint and some of its customers rely on for the lawful export of personal data outside of the EU are standard contractual clauses. Notably, on June 4, 2021, the European Commission published revised standard contractual clauses, which imposed additional requirements on companies that use this mechanism to legitimize transfers of personal data out of the EU to the U.S. and other third countries. There are a number of legal uncertainties regarding the application of the revised standard contractual clauses and ChargePoint will continue to face uncertainty as regulatory guidance is developed in this area as to whether ChargePoint’s efforts to comply with its obligations under European privacy laws will be sufficient. If ChargePoint or its customers are unable to transfer data between and among countries and regions in which it operates, it could decrease demand for its products and services or require it to modify or restrict some of its products or services. Further, the new standard contractual clauses impose obligations regarding previously executed agreements containing the prior version of the standard contractual clauses. Updating agreements to comply with the revised standard contractual clauses is an increased burden and expense on ChargePoint, and not doing so may create the risk of damage to customer relationships or lead to regulatory scrutiny.
Marketing and digital advertising laws such as the EU’s “e-Privacy Directive” and the United States CAN-SPAM Act create further risks for ChargePoint should it not comply with those law’s requirements concerning marketing, cookies and trackers, and email promotions. The CAN-SPAM Act authorizes class actions with statutory damages and the e-Privacy Directive creates a risk of enforcement actions and fines. In the event such a class action or enforcement action is brought against ChargePoint, it may need to expend costs and resources defending such litigation or enforcement action and any potential damages or fines awarded as the result of such actions, which could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s business and reputation. In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy groups, the technology industry and other industries have established or may establish various new, additional or different self-regulatory standards that may place additional burdens on technology companies. Customers may expect that ChargePoint will meet voluntary certifications or adhere to other standards established by them or third-parties. If ChargePoint is unable to maintain these certifications or meet these standards, it could reduce demand for its solutions and adversely affect its business.
Failure to comply with anticorruption and anti-money laundering laws, including the FCPA and similar laws associated with activities outside of the United States, could subject ChargePoint to penalties and other adverse consequences.
ChargePoint is subject to the FCPA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, the Anti-Bribery Act and possibly other anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which it conducts activities. It faces significant risks if it fails to comply with the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws that prohibit companies and their employees and third-party intermediaries from promising, authorizing, offering or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or benefits to foreign government officials, political parties and private-sector recipients for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, directing business to any person or securing any advantage. Any violation of the FCPA, other applicable anti-corruption laws, or anti-money laundering laws could result in whistleblower complaints, adverse media coverage, investigations, loss of export privileges, or severe criminal or civil sanctions, which could have an adverse effect on ChargePoint’s reputation, business, operating results and
35

prospects. In addition, ensuring compliance may be costly and time-consuming and responding to any enforcement action may result in a significant diversion of management’s attention and resources, significant defense costs and other professional fees.
ChargePoint is subject to governmental export controls and economic sanctions laws that could impair its ability to compete in international markets and subject ChargePoint to liability if it is not in full compliance with applicable laws.
ChargePoint’s business activities are subject to various restrictions under U.S. export controls and trade and economic sanctions laws, including the U.S. Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations and economic and trade sanctions regulations maintained by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. The U.S. export control laws and U.S. economic sanctions laws include prohibitions on the sale or supply of certain products and services to U.S. embargoed or sanctioned countries, governments, persons and entities and also require authorization for the export of encryption items. In addition, various countries regulate the import of certain encryption technology, including through import and licensing requirements, and have enacted laws that could limit ChargePoint’s ability to distribute its products and services or could limit ChargePoint’s customers’ ability to implement ChargePoint’s products in those countries. If ChargePoint fails to comply with these laws and regulations, ChargePoint and certain of its employees could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export privileges and monetary penalties. Obtaining the necessary authorizations, including any required license, for a particular transaction may be time-consuming, is not guaranteed, and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. ChargePoint’s products may have been in the past, and could in the future be, provided inadvertently in violation of such laws, despite the precautions ChargePoint takes to prevent its products from being provided in violation of such laws. Any violation could result in adverse consequences to ChargePoint, including government investigations and penalties which may adversely affect ChargePoint’s operations and harm its reputation.
Existing and future environmental health and safety laws and regulations could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating costs or construction costs and restrictions. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations may result in substantial fines or other limitations that may adversely impact ChargePoint’s financial results or results of operations.
ChargePoint and its operations, as well as those of ChargePoint’s contractors, suppliers and customers, are subject to certain environmental laws and regulations, including laws related to the use, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes as well as electronic wastes and hardware, whether hazardous or not. These laws may require ChargePoint or others in ChargePoint’s supply and operations chain to obtain permits and comply with procedures that impose various restrictions and obligations that may have material effects on ChargePoint’s operations. If key permits and approvals cannot be obtained on acceptable terms, or if other operational requirements cannot be met in a manner satisfactory for ChargePoint’s operations or on a timeline that meets ChargePoint’s commercial obligations, it may adversely impact ChargePoint’s business.
Environmental and health and safety laws and regulations can be complex and may be subject to change, such as through new requirements enacted at the supranational, national, sub-national and/or local level or new or modified regulations that may be implemented under existing law. The nature and extent of any changes in these laws, rules, regulations and permits may be unpredictable and may have material effects on ChargePoint’s business. Future legislation and regulations or changes in existing legislation and regulations, or interpretations thereof, including those relating to hardware manufacturing, electronic waste or batteries, could cause additional expenditures, restrictions and delays in connection with ChargePoint’s operations as well as other future projects, the extent of which cannot be predicted.
Further, ChargePoint currently relies on third-parties to ensure compliance with certain environmental laws, including those related to the disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. Any failure to properly handle or dispose of such wastes, regardless of whether such failure is ChargePoint’s or its contractors, may result in liability under environmental laws, including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, under which liability may be imposed without regard to fault or degree of contribution for the investigation and clean-up of contaminated sites, as well as impacts to human health and damages to natural resources. Additionally, ChargePoint may not be able to secure contracts with third-parties to continue their key supply chain and disposal services for ChargePoint’s business, which may result in increased costs for compliance with environmental laws and regulations.
ChargePoint may face litigation and other risks as a result of the material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and the restatement of its financial statements.
Following the issuance of the SEC’s Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies on April 12, 2021, the audit committee of ChargePoint’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), after considering the recommendations of management, determined that it was appropriate to restate ChargePoint’s previously filed financial statements for certain periods of non-reliance. As part of this restatement, ChargePoint identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting.
As a result of this material weakness, the restatement, the change in accounting for ChargePoint’s previously outstanding publicly-traded warrants (the “Public Warrants”) and private placement warrants issued to NGP Switchback, LLC, the sponsor of Switchback (the “Private Placement Warrants”), and other matters raised or that may in the future be raised by the SEC, ChargePoint faces potential for litigation or other disputes which may include, among others, claims invoking the federal and state securities laws, contractual claims or other claims arising from the restatement and material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of its financial statements. As of the date of this Annual Report, ChargePoint has no knowledge of any such litigation
36

or dispute. However, ChargePoint can provide no assurance that such litigation or dispute will not arise in the future. Any such litigation or dispute, whether successful or not, could have an adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition. No Public Warrants have been outstanding since January 31, 2022, and no Private Placement Warrants have been outstanding since April 30, 2022.
Risks Related to Ownership of ChargePoint’s Securities
Future sales of ChargePoint’s Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales may occur, could reduce ChargePoint’s stock price, and any conversions of the 2027 Convertible Notes will, and any additional capital raised through the sale of equity or any future convertible securities ChargePoint may issue could, dilute existing stockholders’ ownership.
ChargePoint may raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt securities in the future. In that event, the ownership of existing ChargePoint stockholders would be diluted and the value of the stockholders' equity in Common Stock could be reduced. If ChargePoint raised more equity capital from the sale of Common Stock, institutional or other investors may negotiate terms more favorable than the current prices of ChargePoint’s Common Stock. If ChargePoint issues debt securities, the holders of the debt would have a claim to ChargePoint assets that would be prior to the rights of stockholders until the debt is repaid. Interest on these debt securities would increase costs and could negatively impact operating results. On April 12, 2022, ChargePoint completed a private placement of $300.0 million of aggregate principal amount of the 2027 Convertible Notes which will mature on April 1, 2027. The 2027 Convertible Notes may decrease ChargePoint’s business flexibility and access to capital, require a significant amount of cash to service, dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders and otherwise depress the price of its Common Stock, and delay or hinder an otherwise beneficial takeover of the Company. On July 1, 2022, ChargePoint filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-265986), which permits ChargePoint to offer up to $1.0 billion shares of ChargePoint Common Stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and rights in one or more offerings and in any combination, including in units from time to time (the “Shelf Registration Statement”). Further, as part of the Shelf Registration Statement, ChargePoint may also sell shares of its Common Stock in “at-the-market” offerings pursuant to that certain common stock sales agreement dated July 1, 2022, by and among ChargePoint and the underwriters thereto (the “ATM Facility”). As of January 31, 2023, $450.0 million of shares of Common Stock remained available for sale pursuant to the ATM Facility. The sale of a substantial number of shares of ChargePoint Common Stock pursuant to the ATM Facility, the Shelf Registration Statement or otherwise, or anticipation of any such sales, could cause the trading price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock to decline or make it more difficult for ChargePoint to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that ChargePoint might otherwise desire. In addition, issuances of any shares of ChargePoint Common Stock sold pursuant to the ATM Facility or any securities sold pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement will have a dilutive effect on our existing stockholders.
In accordance with Delaware law and the provisions of ChargePoint’s Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Charter”), ChargePoint may issue preferred stock that ranks senior in right of dividends, liquidation or voting to its Common Stock. The issuance by ChargePoint of such preferred stock may (a) reduce or eliminate the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacyamount of cash available for payment of dividends to other holders of ChargePoint Common Stock, (b) diminish the relative voting strength of the total shares of Common Stock outstanding as a class, or (c) subordinate the claims of ChargePoint holders of Common Stock to ChargePoint assets in the event of a liquidation. ChargePoint cannot predict the size of future issuances of its internal controls. The developmentCommon Stock or any additional issuances of securities convertible into Common Stock or the effect, if any, that future issuances and sales of shares of its Common Stock will have on the market price of its Common Stock. Sales of substantial amounts of ChargePoint Common Stock (including any shares issued upon the conversion of the internal controls2027 Convertible Notes or pursuant to the ATM Facility, the Shelf Registration Statement, or in connection with an acquisition), or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of ChargePoint Common Stock.
ChargePoint may need to raise additional funds and these funds may not be available when needed or may not be available on terms that are favorable to ChargePoint.
ChargePoint may need to raise additional capital in the future to further scale its business and expand to additional markets. ChargePoint may raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-related or debt securities, or through obtaining credit from government or financial institutions. ChargePoint cannot be certain that additional funds will be available on favorable terms when required, or at all. In addition, if ChargePoint cannot raise additional funds when needed, its financial condition, results of operations, business and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. If ChargePoint raises funds through the issuance of debt securities or through loan arrangements, the terms of such arrangements could require significant interest payments or contain covenants that restrict ChargePoint’s business, or other unfavorable terms, any such entityof which could materially adversely affect ChargePoint’s business.
ChargePoint has incurred substantial indebtedness that may decrease its business flexibility, access to achieve compliancecapital, and/or increase its borrowing costs, and ChargePoint may still incur substantially more debt, which may adversely affect its operations and financial results.
In April 2022, ChargePoint issued the 2027 Convertible Notes. The indenture for the 2027 Convertible Notes includes a restrictive covenant that, subject to specified exceptions, limits the ability of ChargePoint and its subsidiaries to incur secured debt in excess of $750.0 million. In addition, the indenture includes customary terms and covenants, including certain events of default after which the holders may accelerate the maturity of the 2027 Convertible Notes and declare 100% of the principal of, and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on, the 2027 Convertible Notes to become due and payable immediately. As a result of these and other terms in the indenture, ChargePoint’s indebtedness may:
37

limit ChargePoint’s ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general business purposes;
limit ChargePoint’s ability to use its cash flow or obtain additional financing for future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general business purposes;
require ChargePoint to use a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to make debt service payments;
limit ChargePoint’s flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in its business and industry;
place ChargePoint at a competitive disadvantage compared to its less leveraged competitors; and
increase ChargePoint’s vulnerability to the impact of adverse economic and industry conditions.
Further, the indenture governing the 2027 Convertible Notes does not restrict ChargePoint’s ability to incur additional indebtedness other than secured debt, and as a result it and its subsidiaries may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future.
Concentration of ownership among ChargePoint’s existing executive officers, directors and their affiliates may prevent new investors from influencing significant corporate decisions.
As reported in the table captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” included in the Proxy Statement for ChargePoint’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increaseSEC on May 27, 2022, as of April 30, 2022, ChargePoint’s directors, executive officers and their affiliates in the time and costs necessaryaggregate beneficially own approximately 23.6% of the outstanding Common Stock. As a result, these stockholders are able to completeexercise a significant level of control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, any such acquisition.

Provisions in our amended and restatedamendment of the certificate of incorporation and Delaware law may inhibit a takeoverapproval of us, whichsignificant corporate transactions. This control could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our Class A common stock and could entrench management.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered board of directors and the ability of the board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preferred stock, which may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.

We are also subject to anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. Together, these provisions may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and Delaware law may have the effect of discouraging lawsuitsdelaying or preventing a change of control or changes in management and will make the approval of certain transactions difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders.

ChargePoint has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock and does not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
ChargePoint has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock and currently intends to retain any future earnings to fund the growth of its business. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the Board and will depend on financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, general business conditions and other factors that the Board may deem relevant. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of Common Stock will be the sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
The price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock may be subject to wide fluctuations.
The trading price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock will be volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond ChargePoint’s control. These factors include:
actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results;
failure to meet or exceed financial estimates and projections of the investment community or that ChargePoint provides to the public;
issuance of new or updated research or reports by securities analysts or changed recommendations for the industry in general;
announcements of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, collaborations or capital commitments;
changes in competitive factors;
operating and share price performance of other companies in ChargePoint’s industry or related markets;
sales of shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock into the market pursuant to the exercise of registration rights;
the timing and magnitude of investments in the growth of the business;
actual or anticipated changes in laws and regulations, including U.S. monetary policy;
additions or departures of key management or other personnel;
increased labor costs;
disputes or other developments related to intellectual property or other proprietary rights, including litigation;
the ability to market new and enhanced solutions on a timely basis;
38

sales of substantial amounts of the Common Stock by the members of the Board, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur;
changes in capital structure, including future issuances of securities or the incurrence of debt; and
general economic, political and market conditions, including those resulting from the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine and increased trade restrictions by governmental and private entities.
In addition, the stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. Broad market and industry factors likely have seriously affected and may continue to seriously affect the market price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock, regardless of actual operating performance. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against oursuch a company. This litigation, if instituted against ChargePoint as a result of actual and potential volatility described above, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.
Servicing the 2027 Convertible Note obligations will require a significant amount of cash. ChargePoint may not have sufficient cash flow from its business to pay its outstanding debt, and ChargePoint may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to settle conversions of the 2027 Convertible Notes in cash or to repurchase the 2027 Convertible Notes upon a fundamental change, which could adversely affect its business and results of operations.
ChargePoint’s ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on, or to refinance its indebtedness, including the amounts payable under the 2027 Convertible Notes, depends on its future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive, and other factors beyond its control. ChargePoint’s business may not generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service its indebtedness and make necessary capital expenditures. Interest on the 2027 Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1, commencing on October 1, 2022, and the 2027 Convertible Notes will mature on April 1, 2027, unless redeemed, repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date. While ChargePoint can elect to make any interest payment in cash, paid in kind through an increase in the principal amount of the 2027 Convertible Notes, referred to as PIK Interest, or any combination thereof, to the extent ChargePoint elects PIK Interest, the 2027 Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.00% per annum, compared to 3.50% per annum to the extent paid in cash. If ChargePoint is unable to generate sufficient cash flow to pay the principal and/or interest on its indebtedness, ChargePoint’s flexibility in how it pays interest on the 2027 Convertible Notes may be limited and it may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt, or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive, to pay its outstanding indebtedness. ChargePoint’s ability to refinance its indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and its financial condition at such time. For example, interest rate increases and/or other monetary policy changes, could ultimately result in higher short-term and/or long-term interest rates and could otherwise impact the general availability of credit. Higher prevailing interest rates and/or a tightening supply of credit would adversely affect the terms upon which ChargePoint would be able to refinance its indebtedness, if at all. As a result, ChargePoint may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on its debt obligations.
In the event of a fundamental change or a change in control transaction (each such term as defined in the indenture governing the 2027 Convertible Notes), holders of the 2027 Convertible Notes will have the right to require ChargePoint to repurchase all or a portion of their 2027 Convertible Notes at a price equal to 100% of the capitalized principal amount of 2027 Convertible Notes, in the case of a fundamental change, or 125% of the capitalized principal amount of 2027 Convertible Notes, in the case of a change in control transaction, in each case plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date. This feature of the 2027 Convertible Notes could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of ChargePoint, whether or not it is desired by, or beneficial to, ChargePoint’s stockholders, and may result in the acquisition of ChargePoint on terms less favorable to its stockholders than it would otherwise be, or could require ChargePoint to pay a portion of the consideration available in such a transaction to holders of the 2027 Convertible Notes. In addition, upon conversion of the 2027 Convertible Notes, unless ChargePoint elects to deliver solely shares of its Common Stock to settle such conversion (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), ChargePoint will be required to make cash payments in respect of the 2027 Convertible Notes being converted. However, ChargePoint may not have enough available cash, or be able to obtain sufficient financing, at the time it is required to pay cash with respect to the 2027 Convertible Notes being converted.
The conditional conversion feature of the 2027 Convertible Notes, when triggered, may adversely affect ChargePoint’s financial condition and operating results. In addition, any such conversion of the 2027 Convertible Notes will dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders, including holders who had previously converted their 2027 Convertible Notes, or may otherwise depress ChargePoint’s stock price.
Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding January 1, 2027, the 2027 Convertible Notes will be convertible subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the indenture for such 2027 Convertible Notes. On or after January 1, 2027, holders of the 2027 Convertible Notes will have the right to convert all or a portion of their 2027 Convertible Notes at any time prior to close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date. Once any such conditional conversion feature of the 2027 Convertible Notes is triggered, holders of the 2027 Convertible Notes will be entitled to convert their 2027 Convertible Notes at any time during the specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their 2027 Convertible Notes, unless ChargePoint elects to satisfy its conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of its Common Stock (other
39

than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), ChargePoint would be required to settle a portion or all of its conversion obligation in cash, which could adversely affect its liquidity.
In addition, the conversion of some or all of the 2027 Convertible Notes will dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders to the extent ChargePoint delivers shares of Common Stock upon such conversion. Any sales in the public market of ChargePoint Common Stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of ChargePoint Common Stock. In addition, the existence of the 2027 Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the 2027 Convertible Notes could be used to satisfy short positions, or anticipated conversion of the 2027 Convertible Notes into shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock could depress ChargePoint’s stock price.
The accounting method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash, such as the 2027 Convertible Notes, could have a material effect on ChargePoint’s reported financial results.
The accounting method for reflecting the 2027 Convertible Notes on ChargePoint’s balance sheet, accruing interest expense for the 2027 Convertible Notes, and reflecting the underlying shares of its Common Stock in ChargePoint’s reported diluted earnings per share may adversely affect its reported earnings and financial condition.
ChargePoint expects that, under applicable accounting principles, the initial liability carrying amount of the 2027 Convertible Notes will be the fair value of a similar debt instrument that does not have a conversion feature, valued using its cost of capital for straight, unconvertible debt. ChargePoint has reflected the difference between the net proceeds from the sale of the 2027 Convertible Notes and the initial carrying amount as a debt discount for accounting purposes, which is amortized into interest expense over the term of the 2027 Convertible Notes. As a result of this amortization, the interest expense to be recognized for the 2027 Convertible Notes for accounting purposes will be greater than the cash interest payments ChargePoint may pay on the 2027 Convertible Notes, were it to elect to pay interest in cash, which results in lower reported net income. The lower reported income (or higher net loss) resulting from this accounting treatment could depress the trading price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock and the 2027 Convertible Notes. In addition, under Accounting Standards Update 2020-06, Debt--Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging--Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40), diluted earnings per share is generally calculated assuming that all the 2027 Convertible Notes were converted solely into shares of Common Stock at the beginning of the reporting period, unless the result would be anti-dilutive. The application of this “if-converted” method may reduce ChargePoint’s reported diluted earnings per share.
Furthermore, if any of the conditions to the convertibility of the 2027 Convertible Notes is satisfied, then ChargePoint may be required under applicable accounting standards to reclassify the liability carrying value of the 2027 Convertible Notes as a current, rather than a long-term, liability. This reclassification could be required even if no noteholders convert their 2027 Convertible Notes and could materially reduce ChargePoint’s reported working capital.
The coverage of ChargePoint’s business or its securities by securities or industry analysts or the absence thereof could adversely affect the trading price and volume of ChargePoint’s Common Stock and other securities.
The trading market for ChargePoint’s securities is influenced in part by the research and other reports that industry or securities analysts publish about ChargePoint or its business or industry from time to time. ChargePoint does not control these analysts or the content and opinions included in their reports. If no or few analysts continue equity research coverage of ChargePoint, the trading price and volume of ChargePoint’s securities would likely be negatively impacted. If analysts do cover ChargePoint and one or more of them downgrade its securities, or if they issue other unfavorable commentary about ChargePoint or its industry or inaccurate research, the trading price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock and other securities would likely decline. Furthermore, if one or more of these analysts cease coverage or fail to regularly publish reports on ChargePoint, it could lose visibility in the financial markets. Any of the foregoing would likely cause the trading price and volume of ChargePoint’s Common Stock and other securities to decline.
Anti-takeover provisions contained in ChargePoint’s governing documents and applicable laws could impair a takeover attempt.
ChargePoint’s Charter and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “A&R Bylaws”) afford certain rights and powers to the Board that could contribute to the delay or prevention of an acquisition that it deems undesirable. ChargePoint is also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and other provisions of Delaware law that limit the ability of stockholders in certain situations to effect certain mergers. Any of the foregoing provisions and terms that have the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of their Common Stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for the Common Stock. ChargePoint’s Charter provides, subject to limited exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation matters, which could limit stockholders’ ability to obtain a more favorable judicial forum for disputes with ChargePoint or its directors, and officers.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporationofficers, employees or stockholders.

The Charter requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that derivative actions brought in our name,on behalf of ChargePoint, actions against current or former directors, officers, andstockholders or, subject to certain exceptions, employees for breach of fiduciary duty and certain other similar actions (other than actions arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act) may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware (or,or, if suchthat court does not havelacks subject matter jurisdiction, thereof, any otheranother federal or state court locatedsituated in the State of Delaware with subject matter jurisdiction) and, if brought outsideDelaware. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in shares of Delaware, the stockholder bringing such suit willcapital stock of ChargePoint shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to servicethe forum provisions in the certificate of process on such stockholder’s counsel. Thisincorporation. In addition, the Charter and A&R Bylaws provide that, unless ChargePoint consents in writing to another
40

forum, the federal district courts of the United States shall, to the fullest extent of the law, be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
The choice of forum provision in ChargePoint’s Charter may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us and ourChargePoint or any of its directors, officers, or other employees or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, ChargePoint may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm its business, operating results and financial condition.
Sales, or the perception of future sales, of a substantial number of shares of Common Stock by ChargePoint’s existing stockholders could cause the price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock to decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of ChargePoint’s Common Stock. For instance, in connection with the closing of the Merger, ChargePoint and the holders of registration rights in Switchback and Legacy ChargePoint entered into an amended and restated Registration Rights Agreement (the “A&R Registration Rights Agreement” and such holders the “Registration Rights Holders”). In certain circumstances, the Registration Rights Holders can demand certain underwritten offerings and will be entitled to customary piggyback registration rights. Also, in connection with the consummation of the acquisition of HTB, ChargePoint entered into a registration rights agreement with the former shareholders of HTB providing for the filing of a resale registration statement as more completely described below.
ChargePoint has in the past, and may havein the effectfuture, file registration statements as a result of discouraging lawsuits against oursuch registration rights. For example, on July 12, 2021, ChargePoint filed a resale registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-257855) that relates to the offer and sale from time to time by the selling security holders named in that prospectus of up to 12 million shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock (the “Secondary Offering”). ChargePoint’s directors, executive officers and officers.

Cyber incidentscertain stockholders entered into lock-up agreements with the representatives of the several underwriters, in connection with the Secondary Offering, which expired on September 28, 2021. Further, on October 14, 2021, ChargePoint filed a resale registration statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-260247) that was declared effective by the SEC that relates to the offer and sale from time to time by the selling security holders named in that prospectus of up to 5,695,176 shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock in connection with the consummation of ChargePoint’s acquisition of HTB.

As of October 31, 2021, no shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock were prohibited or attacks directed at us couldotherwise restricted from being sold in the public market under lock-up agreements. Shares issued upon the exercise of stock options outstanding under ChargePoint’s equity incentive plans or pursuant to future awards granted under those plans will become available for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of applicable vesting schedules, any applicable market standoff, a registration statement on Form S-8 and Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the Securities Act.
Warrants are exercisable for ChargePoint’s Common Stock, which would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.

We depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructuredilution to ChargePoint’s stockholders.

As of January 31, 2023, the warrants to purchase Legacy ChargePoint common stock (the “Legacy Warrants”) were exercisable for 34,499,436 shares of Common Stock. Any shares of ChargePoint’s Common Stock issued upon exercise of Legacy Warrants will result in dilution to the then existing holders of Common Stock and cloud applications and services, including thoseincrease the number of third parties with which we may deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breachesshares eligible for resale in our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructurepublic market. Sales of third parties orsubstantial numbers of such shares in the cloud,public market could lead to corruption or misappropriationadversely affect the market price of our assets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data. As an early stage company without significant investments in data security protection, we may not be sufficiently protected against such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss.

ChargePoint’s Common Stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

None.
Item 2. Properties.

Our executive offices are

The corporate headquarters and principal operations is located at 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1010, Dallas, TX 75225. The cost for our usein Campbell, California, and consists of approximately 72,000 square feet of office space under leases that expire on August 31, 2029. ChargePoint believes this space is includedsufficient to meet its needs for the foreseeable future and that any additional space ChargePoint may require will be available on commercially reasonable terms. ChargePoint also leases facilities in Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Gurgaon, India; Radstadt, Austria and Reading, United Kingdom; Scottsdale, Arizona and San Jose, California; as well as smaller sales offices in the $10,000 per month fee we pay to our Sponsor for office space, utilities, secretarial supportUnited States and administrative services. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.

Europe.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

There

Information with respect to this item may be found in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under “Legal Proceedings” which is no material litigation, arbitration or governmental proceeding currently pending against us or any membersincorporated herein by reference.
41

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


42


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our Units began trading on the NYSE for Common Stock

ChargePoint’s Common Stock is traded under the symbol “SBE.U”“CHPT” and is listed on July 26, 2019. Commencingthe New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
Dividend Policy
ChargePoint has never declared or paid dividend on September 16, 2019, holders of the Units could electits Common Stock and has no plans to separately trade the shares of Class A common stock and Warrants includeddo so in the Units. The sharesforeseeable future.
Number of Class A common stock and Warrants that are separated trade on the NYSE under the symbols “SBE” and “SBE WS,” respectively. Those Units not separated continue to trade on the NYSE under the symbol “SBE.U.”

Holders

AtCommon Stockholders

As of March 27, 2020,28, 2023, there was one holder of record of our Units, one holder of record of our Class A common stock, threewere approximately 318 holders of record of our Class B common stock, one holderChargePoint’s Common Stock. The actual number of stockholders is greater than this number of record of our Warrantsholders and one holder of record of our Private Placement Warrants.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

None.

Recent includes stockholders who are beneficial owners but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees.

Sales of Unregistered Securities;Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds from Registered Offerings

Unregistered Sales

On May 16, 2019, our Sponsor purchased an aggregate

None.
Stock Performance
The following shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of 8,625,000 Founder Shares for $25,000, or approximately $0.003 per share. The Founder Shares will automatically convert into shares of our Class A common stock at the time of our initial business combination. On July 25, 2019, our Sponsor transferred an aggregate of 80,000 Founder Shares to our independent directors at their original purchase price. In September 2019, our Sponsor forfeited an aggregate of 772,059 Founder Shares. The Founder Shares were issued in connection with our organization pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2)18 of the Securities Act.

Simultaneously withExchange Act, or incorporated by reference into any of ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.'s other filings under the consummation of our Public Offering, our Sponsor purchased from the Company an aggregate of 5,333,333 Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant (for a purchase price of approximately $8.0 million). In addition, simultaneously with the closing of the sale of the Overallotment Units, we consummated the sale of an additional 188,235 Private Placement Warrants in a private placement to our Sponsor, generating gross proceeds of approximately $282,000. Each Private Placement Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of our Class A common stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per share. The sales of the Private Placement Warrants were made pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

Use of Proceeds

On July 30, 2019, we consummated the Public Offering of 30,000,000 Units. The Units were sold at a price of $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $300.0 million. Certain of our officers and directors purchased 200,000 of the 30,000,000 Units sold in the Public Offering for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million. The underwriters were granted a 45-day option from the date of the final prospectus relating to the Public Offering to purchase up to 4,500,000 additional Units to cover over-allotments, if any, at $10.00 per Unit, less underwriting discounts and commissions. On September 4, 2019, the underwriters partially exercised the over-allotment option and, on September 6, 2019, the underwriters purchased 1,411,763 of the Overallotment Units, generating gross proceeds of approximately $14.1 million. The over-allotment option subsequently expired.


On July 30, 2019, simultaneously with the closing of the Public Offering, we completed the private sale of 5,333,333 Private Placement Warrants at a purchase price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant to our Sponsor, generating gross proceeds of approximately $8.0 million. Simultaneously with the closing of the sale of the Overallotment Units, we completed the private sale of an additional 188,235 Private Placement Warrants at a purchase price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant to our Sponsor, generating gross proceeds of approximately $282,000.

Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, Inc. served as underwriters for the Public Offering. The securities sold in the Public Offering were registered underExchange Act or the Securities Act on a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-232501) (the “Registration Statement”). The SEC declared the Registration Statement effective on July 25, 2019.

From May 10, 2019 (inception) through December 31, 2019, we incurred approximately $17.7 million for costs and expenses relatedof 1933, as amended, except to the Public Offering, including an up-front fee of approximately $6.24 million in underwriting discounts and commissions and approximately $10.92 million in deferred underwriting discounts and commissions, which amount will be payable upon consummation of our initial business combination. Prior toextent ChargePoint specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

The graph below matches ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.'s cumulative total shareholder return on Common Stock with the closingcumulative total returns of the Public Offering, our Sponsor loaned us approximately $251,000 under a promissory note (the “Note”). We repaid this Note to our Sponsor on August 12, 2019. There has been no material change inS&P Midcap 400 index, the planned use of proceeds from the Public Offering as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC on July 29, 2019.

After deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions (excluding the deferred portion of approximately $10.92 million, which amount will be payable upon consummation of our initial business combination) and offering expenses, the total net proceeds from the Public OfferingS&P Application Software index, and the saleS&P 500 Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in ChargePoint's Common Stock and in each index (with the Private Placement Warrants were approximately $315.1 million,reinvestment of which approximately $314.1 million (or $10.00 per share soldall dividends) from September 16, 2019 to January 31, 2023.

chpt-20230131_g1.jpg
The stock price performance included in the Public Offering) was placed in the Trust Account.

this graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

43

Company/IndexSeptember 16, 2019January 31, 2020January 31, 2021January 31, 2022January 31, 2023
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.$100.00 $102.46 $389.96 $141.91 $124.39 
S&P Midcap 400$100.00 $107.46 $127.30 $145.19 $148.59 
S&P Application Software$100.00 $117.05 $154.77 $174.16 $137.81 
S&P 500 Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals$100.00 $137.68 $230.27 $307.62 $269.95 
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. As a result, pursuant to Item 301(c) of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

[Reserved.]

Not applicable.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis provides information which ChargePoint’s management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of ChargePoint’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. ChargePoint’s fiscal year ends on January 31. References to fiscal years 2023, 2022, and 2021, relate to the fiscal years ended January 31, 2023, January 31, 2022, and January 31, 2021, respectively. This section of this Form 10-K discusses fiscal year 2023 and 2022 items and year-to-year comparisons between fiscal year 2023 and 2022. Discussions of fiscal year 2021 items and year-over-year comparisons between fiscal year 2022 and fiscal year 2021 are not included in this Form 10-K, and can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of the Company’s financial condition and results of operationsAnnual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 4, 2022. The discussion should be read in conjunctiontogether with the auditedconsolidated financial statements and therelated notes related thereto whichthat are included elsewhere in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain information contained in theThis discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and analysis set forth below includes forward-looking statements. Ouruncertainties. ChargePoint’s actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of manyvarious factors, including those set forth under “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Part“Risk Factors” included under Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors”1 A.
Overview
ChargePoint designs, develops and elsewheremarkets networked EV charging system infrastructure (“Networked Charging Systems”) connected through cloud-based services (“Cloud” or “Cloud Services”) which (i) enable charging systems owners, or hosts, to manage their Networked Charging Systems, and (ii) enable drivers to locate, reserve and authenticate Networked Charging Systems and to transact EV charging sessions on those systems. ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions and other offerings provide an open platform that integrates with system hardware from ChargePoint and other manufacturers, connecting systems over an intelligent network that provides real-time information about charging sessions and full control, support and management of the Networked Charging Systems. This network provides multiple web-based portals for charging system owners, fleet managers, drivers and utilities.
ChargePoint generates revenue primarily through the sale of Networked Charging Systems, Cloud Services and extended parts and labor warranties (“Assure”). The Company also generates revenue, in this Annual Reportsome instances, by providing customers use of ChargePoint’s owned and operated systems, Cloud Services and Assure into a single multi-year or annual subscription (“ChargePoint as a Service” or “CPaaS”). Each of Cloud Services, Assure and CPaaS is typically paid for upfront and revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the subscription period.
ChargePoint targets three key verticals: commercial, fleet and residential. Commercial customers have parking places largely within their workplaces and include retail, hospitality, healthcare, fueling and convenience and parking lot operators. Fleet includes municipal buses, delivery and work vehicles, port/airport/warehouse and other industrial applications, ridesharing services, and is expected to eventually include autonomous transportation. Residential includes single family homes and multifamily residences.
On February 26, 2021 (“Closing Date”), Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation (“Switchback”) consummated the previously announced transactions pursuant to which Lightning Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Switchback (“Lightning Merger Sub”), merged with ChargePoint, Inc. (“Legacy ChargePoint”) pursuant to a Merger Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of September 23, 2020, by and among the Company, Lightning Merger Sub, and Switchback (“Merger Agreement”). Legacy ChargePoint survived as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Switchback (“Merger” and, collectively with the other transactions described in the Merger Agreement, the “Reverse Recapitalization”). Further, as a result of the Merger, Switchback was renamed “ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.”
Since its inception in 2007, ChargePoint has been engaged in developing and marketing its Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions and other offerings, raising capital and recruiting personnel. ChargePoint has incurred net operating losses and negative cash flows from operations in every year since its inception. As of January 31, 2023 and 2022, ChargePoint had an accumulated deficit of $1,156.8 million and $811.7 million, respectively. ChargePoint has funded its operations primarily from customer payments, the issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock and convertible notes, exercise proceeds from options and warrants, borrowings under loan facilities and proceeds from the Reverse Recapitalization.
44

Key Factors Affecting Operating Results
ChargePoint believes its performance and future success depend on Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a blank check company incorporatedseveral factors that present significant opportunities for it but also pose risks and challenges, including those discussed below:

Growth in Delaware on May 10, 2019EV Adoption
ChargePoint’s revenue growth is directly tied to the number of passenger and commercial EVs sold, which it believes drives the demand for charging infrastructure. The market for EVs is still rapidly evolving and although demand for EVs has grown in recent years, there is no guarantee of such future demand. Factors impacting the purposeadoption of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. Although weEVs include but are not limited to: perceptions about EV features, quality, safety, performance and cost; perceptions about the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge; volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline; availability of services for EVs; consumers’ perception about the convenience and cost of charging EVs; and increases in fuel efficiency of internal combustion engine vehicles. In addition, macroeconomic factors, including governmental mandates and incentives and the impact of rising interest rates, inflation and a potential economic recession, could impact demand for EVs, particularly since they can be more expensive to purchase than traditional gasoline-powered vehicles. Further, geopolitical factors, such as the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, conflicts between the United States and China or between China and Taiwan may negatively impact the global automotive supply chain and reduce the manufacturing of automobiles, including EVs. If the market for EVs does not develop as expected or if there is any slow-down or delay in overall EV adoption or manufacturing rates, ChargePoint’s financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.
Competition
ChargePoint is currently a market leader in North America in commercial Level 2 Alternating Current (“AC”) charging. ChargePoint also offers AC chargers for use at home or multifamily settings and for fleet applications, and high-power Level 3 Direct Current (“DC”) chargers for fast urban charging, corridor or long-trip charging and fleet applications. ChargePoint intends to expand its market share over time in its product categories, leveraging the network effect of its products and Cloud Services software. Existing competitors may expand their product offerings and sales strategies, and new competitors may enter the market. If ChargePoint’s market share decreases due to increased competition, its financial condition and results of operations may be negatively impacted. Furthermore, ChargePoint’s success could be negatively impacted if consumers and businesses choose other types of alternative fuel vehicles or high fuel-economy gasoline powered vehicles.
Europe Expansion
ChargePoint operates in North America and several countries in Europe. Europe is expected to be a significant contributor to ChargePoint’s revenue in future years. ChargePoint has been and is investing heavily to succeed in Europe. ChargePoint is also working to grow its European business through partnerships with channel partners and car leasing companies and through its acquisitions of ViriCiti B.V. (“ViriCiti”) and has•to•be gmbh (“HTB”) (each as described in Note 5, Reverse Capitalization and Business Combinations, to ChargePoint’s notes to the consolidated financial statements). In Europe, ChargePoint primarily competes with other providers of EV charging station networks. Many of these competitors have limited funding, which could cause poor customer experiences and have a negative impact on overall EV adoption in Europe. ChargePoint’s growth in Europe requires differentiating itself as compared to these existing competitors. If ChargePoint is unable to continue penetrating the market in Europe, its financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted.
Fleet Expansion
ChargePoint’s future growth is also highly dependent upon success in fleet applications, where there is increasing competition, a high customer dependency on the expected increase in the arrival rate of new vehicles, and likely high concentrations and volatility of purchasing as fleet operators ultimately choose their key providers and make large purchases of EVs. Any significant decline from these customers may have an adverse impact on ChargePoint’s potential for future growth. If the Company is not successful in the fleet vertical, its financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Impact of New Product Releases and Investments in Growth
As ChargePoint introduces new products, such as the release of its Express Plus DC fast charger in fiscal year 2022 and CP6000 Level 2 AC charger in fiscal year 2023, its gross margins may be initially negatively impacted by launch costs and lower volumes until it achieves targeted cost reductions. Cost reductions may not occur on the timeline ChargePoint expects due to a particular industrynumber of factors, including but not limited to failure to meet its own estimates, unanticipated supply chain difficulties, government mandates or sector for purposes of consummating our initial business combination, we intend to focus our search for a target businesscertification requirements. For example, ongoing supply chain challenges, heightened logistic costs, component shortages and product transition charges decreased ChargePoint’s gross margins in the energyfiscal year ended January 31, 2023, and ChargePoint expects gross margins will continue to be adversely affected by increased material costs and freight and logistic expenses in the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024. In addition, ChargePoint may accelerate its expenditures where it sees growth opportunities, which may further impact
45

gross margin until upfront costs and inefficiencies are absorbed and normalized operations are achieved. Further, ChargePoint continues to invest in prioritizing an assurance of supply of its products and new customer acquisition as part of its “land and expand” model, which in the current environment, puts pressure on gross margins and increases operating expenses. ChargePoint also continuously evaluates and may adjust its expenditures, such as new product introduction costs, based on its launch plans for new products, as well as other factors including the pace and prioritization of current projects under development and the addition of new projects. As ChargePoint attains higher revenue, it expects operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue to decrease as it scales and focuses on increasing operational efficiency and process automation.
Government Mandates, Incentives and Programs
The U.S. federal government, certain foreign governments and some state and local governments provide incentives to end users and purchasers of EVs and EV infrastructure in the form of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives. These governmental rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives significantly lower the effective price of EVs and EV infrastructure to customers. For example, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act signed into law on November 15, 2021 (the “Jobs Act”) provided additional funding for EVs and EV charging infrastructure through the creation of new programs and grants and the expansion of existing programs, including $7.5 billion for EV charging along highway corridors and communities. In addition, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) signed into law on August 16, 2022 includes incentives and tax credits aimed at reducing the effects of climate change, such as the extension of electric vehicle charging infrastructure tax credits under Section 30C and tax credits for electric vehicles under Section 30D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) through 2032. There are numerous restrictions and requirements associated with qualifying for the electric vehicle tax credits available under the IRA and ChargePoint is still assessing how the IRA may impact its business and EV sales generally. Further, incentives such as the Jobs Act and the IRA take time to be disbursed and to affect actual expenditure decisions. These incentives may also expire on specified dates, end when the allocated funding is no longer available, or be reduced or terminated as a matter of regulatory or legislative policy. Any reduction in rebates, tax credits or other financial incentives could reduce the demand for EVs and for charging infrastructure, including infrastructure ChargePoint offers.
ChargePoint also derives other revenue from fees received for regulatory incentives earned for participating in low carbon fuel programs in some U.S. states. ChargePoint claims these incentives only if they are not claimed by purchasers of its EV charging stations. If a material percentage of its customers were to claim these incentives, ChargePoint’s revenue from this source could decline significantly, which could have an adverse effect on its revenue and overall gross margin. Prior to fiscal year 2021, ChargePoint derived a slight majority of its other revenue from these incentives. However, revenue from this source as a percentage of total revenue has declined since fiscal 2021 and may continue to decline as a percentage of total revenue going forward. Further, the availability of such incentives depends on continued governmental support for these programs. If these programs are modified, reduced or eliminated, ChargePoint’s ability to generate this revenue in the future would be adversely impacted.
Supply Chain Disruptions and Other Factors

Global supply chain disruptions, initially caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, continue to affect ChargePoint’s business. The disruption to ChargePoint’s supply chain has heightened its material, freight and logistic costs, and has similarly disrupted manufacturing, delivery and overall supply chain of vehicle manufacturers and suppliers, which has contributed to fluctuations in EV sales in markets around the world. These ongoing supply chain challenges and heightened logistic costs decreased gross margins in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023, and ChargePoint expects that gross margins will continue to be adversely affected by increased material costs and freight and logistic expenses in the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024.

Also, more permanent work-from-home policies, initially caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, are likely to continue affecting the rate of global infrastructure spending, and thus to continue to adversely impact ChargePoint’s commercial business and its overall gross margin as ChargePoint’s commercial business contributes higher margins than its residential and fleet businesses. Further, the continued disruption to ChargePoint’s supply chains and heightened component and shipping pricing and logistics expenses may further adversely impact ChargePoint’s gross margins, adversely affect demand for ChargePoint’s products, lengthen its product development and sales cycles, and reduce expected spending from new customers, all of which could adversely affect ChargePoint’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, global economic uncertainty due to other macroeconomic conditions, including inflation, interest rate pressures, negative events in the financial services industry, and labor market disruptions, and related growing concerns of a potential recession, have impacted customer behavior related to discretionary spending and sentiment and could continue to impact such behaviors in North America. Our Sponsorthe future. Any resulting decline in the ability or willingness of customers, fleet owners and operators to purchase ChargePoint’s products or subscription services could have an adverse impact on ChargePoint’s results of operations and financial condition.
46

Results of Operations & its Components
Revenue
Networked Charging Systems
Networked Charging Systems revenue includes the deliveries of EV charging system infrastructure, which include a range of AC products for use in residential, commercial and fleet applications, and DC, or fast-charge products for use in commercial and fleet applications. A significant portion of ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems revenue is presently derived from the sale of AC products. ChargePoint generally recognizes revenue from sales of Networked Charging Systems upon shipment to the customer, at which point ChargePoint’s performance obligation is satisfied.
Subscriptions
Subscriptions revenue consists of services related to Cloud, as well as extended maintenance service plans under Assure. Subscriptions revenue also consists of CPaaS revenue which combines the customer’s use of ChargePoint’s owned and operated systems with Cloud and Assure programs into a single, typically multi-year subscription.
In some instances, CPaaS subscriptions are considered for accounting purposes to contain a lease for the customer’s use of ChargePoint’s owned and operated systems unless the location allows the customer to receive incremental economic benefit from regulatory credits earned on that EV charging system. Lessor revenue relates to operating leases and historically has not been material. Subscriptions revenue is generally recognized over time on a straight-line basis as ChargePoint has an ongoing obligation to deliver such services to the customer.
Other
Other revenue consists of charging related fees received from drivers using charging sites owned and operated by ChargePoint, net transaction fees earned for processing payments collected on driver charging sessions at charging sites owned by its customers, fees received for transferring regulatory incentives earned for participating in low carbon fuel programs in some states, and other professional services. Revenue from driver charging sessions and charging transaction fees is recognized when the charging session or transaction is completed. Revenue from regulatory incentives is recognized when the regulatory incentives are transferred. Revenue from fees for owned and operated sites is recognized over time on a straight-line basis over the performance period of the service contract as ChargePoint has an ongoing obligation to deliver such services. Revenue from professional services is recognized as the services are rendered.
ChargePoint expects revenue to grow in both Networked Charging Systems and subscriptions due to increased demand in EVs and the related charging infrastructure market.

For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Networked Charging Systems$363,622 $173,850 $91,893 $189,772 109.2 %$81,957 89.2 %
Percentage of total revenue77.7 %72.1 %62.7 %
Networked Charging Systems revenue increased for fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily due to a continued increase in demand from customers in ChargePoint’s three verticals, resulting in higher volume of Networked Charging Systems delivered across ChargePoint’s major product families.
For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Subscriptions$85,296 $53,512 $40,563 $31,784 59.4 %$12,949 31.9 %
Percentage of total revenue18.2 %22.2 %27.7 %
Subscriptions revenue increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily due to the growth in the number of Cloud subscriptions and Assure subscriptions for Networked Charging Systems connected to ChargePoint’s network.
47

For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Other revenue$19,176 $13,644 $14,034 $5,532 40.5 %$(390)(2.8)%
Percentage of total revenue4.1 %5.7 %9.6 %
Other revenue increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily due to net transaction fees earned for processing payments collected on driver charging sessions at charging sites owned by ChargePoint’s customers.
Cost of Revenue
Networked Charging Systems
ChargePoint uses contract manufacturers to manufacture the substantial majority of its Networked Charging Systems. ChargePoint’s in-house manufacturing is typically limited to initial development units and to early customer samples. ChargePoint’s cost of revenue for the sale of Networked Charging Systems includes the contract manufacturer costs of finished goods and shipping and handling. Cost of revenue for the sale of Networked Charging Systems also consists of salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, warranty provisions, depreciation of manufacturing related equipment and facilities, and allocated facilities and information technology expenses. As revenue is recognized, ChargePoint accounts for estimated warranty cost as a charge to cost of revenue. The estimated warranty cost is based on historical and predicted product failure rates and repair expenses.
Subscriptions
Cost of Subscriptions revenue includes salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation and third-party support costs to manage the systems and helpdesk services for drivers and site hosts, network and wireless connectivity costs for subscription services, field costs for Assure, depreciation of owned and operated systems used in CPaaS arrangements, allocated facilities and information technology expenses.
Other
Cost of other revenue includes depreciation and other costs for ChargePoint’s owned and operated charging sites, charging related processing charges, salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, as well as costs of professional services.
For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Cost of Networked Charging Systems revenue$318,628 $147,313 $87,083 $171,315 116.3 %$60,230 69.2 %
Percentage of total revenue68.1 %61.1 %59.4 %
Cost of Networked Charging Systems revenue increased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily due to an increase in the number of Networked Charging Systems delivered.
For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Cost of Subscriptions revenue$51,416 $31,190 $20,385 $20,226 64.8 %$10,805 53.0 %
Percentage of total revenue11.0 %12.9 %13.9 %
Cost of subscriptions revenue increased during fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily due to increases in customer support headcount driven by ChargePoint expanding its Networked Charging Systems and resulting in an increase in salaries and personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, as well as Assure maintenance costs.
48

For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Cost of Other Revenue$12,117 $8,970 $6,073 $3,147 35.1 %$2,897 47.7 %
Percentage of total revenue2.6 %3.7 %4.1 %
Cost of other revenue increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily related to increased other operating costs.
Gross Profit and Gross Margin
Gross profit is revenue less cost of revenue and gross margin is gross profit as a percentage of revenue. ChargePoint offers a range of Networked Charging Systems products which vary widely in selling price and associated gross margin, as, for example, ChargePoint’s commercial business contributes higher margins than its residential and fleet businesses. Accordingly, ChargePoint’s gross profit and gross margin have varied and are expected to continue to vary from period to period due to revenue levels; geographic, vertical and product mix; new product transition costs; and its efforts to optimize its operations and supply chain and purchase price variances it may need to pay due to component shortages or supply chain disruptions.
In the long term, improvements in ChargePoint’s gross profit and gross margin will depend on its ability to continue to optimize its operations and supply chain as it increases its revenue. However, at least in the short term, as the product mix continues to vary and as ChargePoint continues to optimize for customer acquisition and prioritize assurance of supply of its products as part of its “land and expand” model, launches new Networked Charging Systems products, grows its presence in Europe where it has not yet achieved economies of scale, and expands its solutions for its fleet customers, gross margin will vary from period to period. In addition, ChargePoint expects gross margins will continue to be adversely affected by increased material costs, particularly due to the shortage of certain semiconductors, as a result of the ongoing worldwide supply chain disruptions.
For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Gross Profit$85,933 $53,533 $32,949 $32,400 60.5 %$20,584 62.5 %
Gross Margin18.4 %22.2 %22.5 %
Gross profit increased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily due to an increase in Networked Charging Systems sales that resulted from an increase in the number of Networked Charging Systems delivered and an increase in subscriptions revenue.
Gross margin decreased for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily
due (i) to product mix changes towards lower gross margin products, (ii) higher purchase price costs and increased logistic costs incurred as the result of component shortages and supply chain challenges, (iii) new product transition costs, and (iv) increases in customer support headcount and resulting personnel compensation.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, for personnel related to the development of improvements and expanded features for ChargePoint’s services, as well as quality assurance, testing, product management, and allocated facilities and information technology expenses. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
ChargePoint expects its research and development expenses to increase on an absolute basis for the foreseeable future as ChargePoint continues to invest in research and development activities to achieve its technology and product roadmap.
For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Research and Development Expenses$194,957 $145,043 $75,017 $49,914 34.4 %$70,026 93.3 %
Percentage of total revenue41.6 %60.2 %51.2 %
49

Research and development expenses increased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 and was primarily attributable to a $24.9 million increase in compensation related expenses due to headcount growth, a $12.5 million increase in stock-based compensation expense from restricted stock unit (“RSU”) grants, a $4.0 million increase in engineering materials and services costs, as well as a $5.5 million increase in depreciation and other expenses.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, sales commissions, professional services fees, travel, marketing and promotional expenses, bad debt expenses, and allocated facilities and information technology expenses.
ChargePoint expects its sales and marketing expenses to increase on an absolute basis for the foreseeable future while it continues to add sales and marketing personnel, expand its sales channels and expand in Europe.
For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Sales and marketing expenses$142,392 $92,550 $53,002 $49,842 53.9 %$39,548 74.6 %
Percentage of total revenue30.4 %38.4 %36.2 %
Sales and marketing expenses increased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily attributable to a $20.4 million increase in compensation related expenses due to headcount growth, a $8.2 million increase in stock-based compensation expense resulting mainly from RSU grants, a $5.5 million increase in amortization expense mainly due to acquired customer relationship intangible assets from business combinations, a $3.5 million increase in travel expenses, and a $3.5 million increase in consulting and marketing expense.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, related to finance, legal and human resource functions, contractor and professional services fees, audit and compliance expenses, insurance costs, and general corporate expenses, including allocated facilities and information technology expenses.
ChargePoint expects its general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars as it continues to grow its business and to operate as a public company, including expenses related to compliance and reporting obligations pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC, as well as higher expenses for investor relations and legal, accounting and other professional services.
For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
General and administrative expenses$90,366 $81,380 $25,922 $8,986 11.0 %$55,458 213.9 %
Percentage of total revenue19.3 %33.8 %17.7 %
General and administrative expenses increased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily attributable to a $9.9 million increase in salary and benefit expenses due to headcount growth, a $4.7 million increase in stock-based compensation expense resulting mainly from RSU grants, a $3.2 million increase in consulting expenses, partially offset by a $6.8 million decrease in professional services fees related to acquisitions and expenses associated with an underwritten secondary offering of shares held by certain selling stockholders and other expense decreases.
Interest Income
Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on ChargePoint’s cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.
50

For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Interest income$5,534 $98 $315 $5,436 5546.9 %$(217)(68.9)%
Percentage of total revenue1.2 %— %0.2 %
Interest income increased during fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 due to interest income from short-term investments purchased in fiscal year 2023.
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists primarily of the interest on ChargePoint’s 2027 Convertible Notes that were issued in April 2022 which are described more completely below in Liquidity and Capital Resources.
For the Year Ended January 31,Change
2023202220212023 vs 20222022 vs 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Interest expense$(9,434)$(1,502)$(3,253)$(7,932)528.1 %$1,751 (53.8)%
Percentage of total revenue(2.0)%(0.6)%(2.2)%
Interest expense increased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily due to interest expense on the 2027 Convertible Notes.
Changes in Fair Value of Warrant Liabilities, Earnout Liabilities and Transaction Costs Expensed
The redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability was subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date. Changes in fair value of redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. ChargePoint adjusts the liability for changes in fair value until the earlier of the exercise or expiration of the warrants and conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock into Common Stock. Common stock warrant liabilities consisted of Public Warrants and private placement warrants issued to NGP Switchback, LLC (“Private Placement Warrants”) which ChargePoint assumed in connection with the Merger and which were subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date. As of April 30, 2022, all Public Warrants and Private Placement Warrants had been exercised or redeemed. The Company recorded a Delaware limited$9.2 million change in fair value of redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability company.

The Registration Statementand $47.8 million change in fair value in assumed common stock warrant liabilities during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2022. As of January 31, 2023, ChargePoint had no outstanding warrant liabilities.

Contingent earnout liability was accounted for our Public Offering was declared effective on July 25, 2019. On July 30, 2019, we consummated the Public Offeringas a liability as of 30,000,000 Units at $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $300.0 million, and incurring offering costs of approximately $17.0 million, inclusive of $10.43 million in deferred underwriting commissions. Certain of our officers and directors purchased 200,000 (the “Affiliated Units”) of the 30,000,000 Units sold in the Public Offering for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million. The underwriters were granted a 45-day option from the date of the final prospectus relatingMerger (as described in Note 12, Stock Warrants and Earnout, to ChargePoint’s notes to the Public Offeringconsolidated financial statements) and remeasured to purchase up fair value until the Earnout Triggering Events (as described in Note 12, Stock Warrants and Earnout, to 4,500,000 additional unitsChargePoint’s notes to cover overallotments, if any, at $10.00 per unit, less underwriting discountsthe consolidated financial statements) were met for the first two tranches in March 2021 and commissions. On September 4, 2019, the underwriters partially exercisedcorresponding Earnout Shares (as described in Note 12, Stock Warrants and Earnout, to ChargePoint’s notes to the overallotment option and, on September 6, 2019,consolidated financial statements) were issued. In March 2021, the underwriters purchased 1,411,763remaining earnout liability for the third tranche converted to be accounted for as equity. The Company recorded a $84.4 million change in fair value of contingent earnout liability during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 due to the decrease in the fair value of ChargePoint’s Common Stock after consummation of the Overallotment Units, generating gross proceeds of approximately $14.1 million.Merger. The remaining overallotment option subsequently expired.


Simultaneously with the closing of the Public Offering, we consummated the sale (the “Private Placement”) of 5,333,333 Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant in a private placement to our Sponsor, generating gross proceeds of approximately $8.0 million. Simultaneously with the closing of the sale of the Overallotment Units, our Sponsor purchased an additional 188,235 Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant, generating gross proceeds of approximately $282,000.

Approximately $314.1 million ($10.00 per Unit) of the net proceeds of the Public Offering (including the Overallotment Units) and certain of the proceeds of the Private PlacementEarnout Triggering Event was placed in a trust account located in the United States with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee, and invested only in U.S. “government securities,” within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act, with a maturity of 185 days or less, or in money market funds meeting the conditions of paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3) and (d)(4) of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act, which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations, as determined by the Company, until the earlier of: (i) the completion of our initial business combination and (ii) the distribution of the Trust Account as described below.

If we are unable to complete an initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of the Public Offering, or July 30, 2021 (the “Combination Period”), we will (i) cease all operations exceptmet for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payablethird and final tranche in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on depositJune 2021, and in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then-outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining stockholders and its board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to our obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.

Results of Operations

Our only activities from inception through December 31, 2019 related to our formation and the Public Offering, and, since the closing of the Public Offering, the search for a prospective initial business combination. We expect to incur increased expenses as a result of being a public company (for legal, financial reporting, accounting and auditing compliance), as well as costs in the pursuit of our acquisition plans.

For the period from May 10, 2019 (inception) through December 31, 2019, we had net income of approximately $780,000, which consisted of approximately $2.3 million of gain on marketable securities, dividends and interest held in the Trust Account, offset by approximately $935,000 in general and administrative expenses, approximately $88,000 in franchise tax expense, and approximately $479,000 in income tax expense.


Related Party Transactions

Founder Shares

On May 16, 2019, our Sponsor purchased 8,625,000 Founder Shares for an aggregate price of $25,000. Our Sponsor agreed to forfeit up to 1,125,000 Founder Shares to the extent that the overallotment option for our Public Offering was not exercised in full by the underwriters. On September 6, 2019, the underwriters purchased 1,411,763 Overallotment Units, andJuly 2021, the remaining overallotment option subsequently expired. As a result, our Sponsor forfeited an aggregateEarnout Shares were issued. The final Earnout Shares were issued in July 2021, and as such, there was no remaining contingent earnout liability during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023.

Transaction costs consist of 772,059 Founder Shares.

The initial stockholders have agreed, subjectlegal, accounting, banking fees and other costs that were directly related to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of the Founder Shares until one year after the date of the consummation of the initial business combination or earlier if, subsequentMerger. Transaction costs related to the initial business combination, (i)issuance of shares were recognized in stockholders’ equity (deficit) while costs of $7.0 million associated with the last sale pricewarrant liabilities and non-capitalized amounts were expensed during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 upon the completion of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (asMerger on February 26, 2021.

Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net consists primarily of foreign currency transaction gains and losses.
51

Year Ended January 31,Year-over-Year Change
2023202220212023 to 20222022 to 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Other income (expense), net$(1,569)$(2,775)$229 $1,206 (43.5)%$(3,004)(1311.8)%
Percentage of total revenue(0.3)%(1.2)%0.2 %
Other income (expense), net changed from $(2.8) million during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 to $(1.6) million during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 due to favorable changes in foreign exchange rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
ChargePoint’s provision for income taxes consists of federal, state and foreign income taxes based on enacted federal, state and foreign tax rates, as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizationsallowable credits, deductions, uncertain tax positions, changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities and changes in tax law. Due to the level of historical losses, ChargePoint maintains a valuation allowance against U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets as it has concluded it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Year Ended January 31,Year-over-Year Change
2023202220212023 to 20222022 to 2021
(dollar amounts in thousands, except percentages)Change
($)
Change
(%)
Change
($)
Change
(%)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$(2,167)$(2,930)$198 $763 (26.0)%$(3,128)(1579.8)%
Percentage of loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes0.6 %2.2 %(0.1)%
The benefit for income taxes decreased during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 as compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022 primarily due to changes to deferred tax liability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
Historical Sources of Liquidity
ChargePoint has incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception, which it anticipates will continue for the foreseeable future. To date, ChargePoint has funded its business and the like)acquisitions of ViriCiti and HTB primarily with proceeds from the issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock, proceeds from the Merger, proceeds from warrant and option exercises for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencingcash, convertible debt and from customer payments. As of January 31, 2023 and 2022, ChargePoint had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and short-term investments of $399.5 million and $315.6 million, respectively. ChargePoint believes that its cash and short-term investments, and cash generated from sales to customers will satisfy its working capital and capital requirements for at least 150 days after the initial business combination or (ii) the Company consummates a subsequent liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction which results in all of the Company’s stockholders having the rightnext twelve months.
From inception to exchange their shares of common stock forJanuary 31, 2023, ChargePoint has raised aggregate net cash securities or other property.

Private Placement Warrants

Simultaneously with the closing of the Public Offering, our Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 5,333,333 Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant, generating gross proceeds of approximately $8.0$615.7 million in the aggregate. Simultaneously with the closing offrom the sale of shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock and $479.2 million from the Overallotment Units, our Sponsor purchased an additional 188,235 Private Placement Warrants atMerger and the concurrent purchase by certain investors of shares of Common Stock pursuant to separate subscription agreements (the “PIPE financing”).

2027 Convertible Notes
In April 2022, ChargePoint completed a priceprivate placement of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant, generating gross proceeds$300.0 million aggregate principal amount of approximately $282,000.

Each whole Private Placement Warrant is exercisable for one whole share of Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share. A portion of the2027 Convertible Notes, which will mature on April 1, 2027 (the “2027 Convertible Notes”). The net proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants to our Sponsor was added to the proceeds from the Public Offering held in the Trust Account. If the Company does not complete an2027 Convertible Notes were approximately $294.0 million after deducting initial business combination within the Combination Period, the Private Placement Warrants will expire worthless. The Private Placement Warrants will be non-redeemable for cashpurchaser discounts and exercisable on a cashless basis so long as they are held by our Sponsor or its permitted transferees.

Our Sponsorcommissions and the Company’s officersoffering expenses. ChargePoint expects to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes.

The 2027 Convertible Notes bear interest at 3.50% per annum, to the extent paid in cash (“Cash Interest”), which is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1st and directors agreed,October 1st of each year or 5.00% per annum through the issuance of additional 2027 Convertible Notes (“PIK Interest”). The 2027 Convertible Notes are convertible, based on the applicable conversion rate, into cash, shares of ChargePoint Common Stock or a combination thereof, at ChargePoint’s election. The initial conversion rate was 41.6119 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the 2027 Convertible Notes, subject to limited exceptions, notcustomary anti-dilution adjustment in certain circumstances, which represented an initial conversion price of approximately $24.03 per share.
52

For additional details refer to transfer, assign or sell any of their Private Placement Warrants until 30 days afterNote 9, Debt, to ChargePoint’s notes to the completion of our initial business combination.

Related Party Loans

consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report.

Shelf Registration and ATM Facility
On May 16, 2019, our Sponsor agreedJuly 1, 2022, ChargePoint filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-265986) with the SEC (that was declared effective by the SEC on July 12, 2022), which permits ChargePoint to loan the Company an aggregate ofoffer up to $300,000$1.0 billion of shares of Common Stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and rights in one or more offerings and in any combination, including in units from time to cover organizational expenses and expenses relatedtime (the “Shelf Registration Statement”). As part of the Shelf Registration Statement, ChargePoint filed a prospectus supplement registering for sale from time to the Public Offeringtime up to $500.0 million shares of Common Stock pursuant to a sales agreement (the “ATM Facility”). During the Note. This loan is non-interest bearing and payable on the completionfiscal year ended January 31, 2023, ChargePoint had generated proceeds of the Public Offering. The Company borrowed approximately $251,000 under the Note, and then repaid the Note in full to our Sponsor on August 12, 2019.


In addition, in order to finance transaction$49.5 million, net of $0.5 million of issuance costs in connection with the sale of common stock under the ATM Facility. As of January 31, 2023, $450.0 million of shares of Common Stock remained available for sale pursuant to the ATM Facility.

Long-Term Liquidity Requirements
ChargePoint has incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception. Until ChargePoint can generate sufficient revenue to cover its cost of sales, operating expenses, working capital and capital expenditures, it expects to primarily fund cash needs through a combination of equity and debt financing. ChargePoint may borrow funds on terms that may include restrictive covenants, including covenants that restrict the operation of its business, liens on assets, high effective interest rates and repayment provisions that reduce cash resources and limit future access to capital markets. ChargePoint expects to opportunistically seek access to additional funds through public or private equity offerings or debt financings, including through potential sales of Common Stock under its ATM Facility. If ChargePoint raises funds by issuing equity securities or debt securities convertible into equity securities, dilution to stockholders may result. Any equity securities issued may also provide for rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of holders of Common Stock. If ChargePoint raises funds by issuing debt securities, these debt securities would have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of Common Stock. The terms of debt securities or borrowings could impose significant restrictions on ChargePoint’s operations and expose ChargePoint to enhanced risks associated with rising interest rates and elevated inflation experienced globally during fiscal year 2023. The capital markets have in the past, and may in the future, experience periods of higher volatility that could impact the availability and cost of equity and debt financing.
ChargePoint’s principal use of cash in recent periods has been funding its operations, the acquisitions of ViriCiti and HTB, and investing in capital expenditures. ChargePoint’s future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including its revenue growth rate, the timing and the amount of cash received from customers, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, expenses associated with its international expansion, the introduction of network enhancements and the continuing market adoption of its Networked Charging Systems. In the future, ChargePoint may enter into arrangements to acquire or invest in complementary businesses, products and technologies. ChargePoint may be required to seek additional equity or debt financing beyond the amounts available to it pursuant to the ATM Facility.
If ChargePoint requires additional financing, it may not be able to raise such financing on acceptable terms or at all, particularly if certain unfavorable economic and market conditions persist or worsen and intensify risks of a potential recession or other economic downturn. If ChargePoint is unable to raise additional capital or generate cash flows necessary to expand its operations and invest in continued innovation, it may not be able to compete successfully, which would harm its business, results of operations and financial condition. If adequate funds are not available, ChargePoint may need to reconsider its expansion plans or limit its research and development activities, which could have a material adverse impact on its business prospects and results of operations.
Cash Flows
For the Fiscal Years Ended January 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021
The following table sets forth a summary of ChargePoint’s cash flows for the periods indicated:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities$(267,049)$(157,178)$(91,846)
Investing activities(126,154)(221,740)35,530 
Financing activities372,859 549,687 128,913 
Effects of exchange rates on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash(729)(1,025)141 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$(21,073)$169,744 $72,738 
53

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
During the year ended January 31, 2023, net cash used in operating activities was $267.0 million, consisting primarily of a net loss of $345.1 million and change in operating assets and liabilities of $64.3 million, offset by an initial business combination, our Sponsor or an affiliateadd back of our Sponsor, or certainnon-cash charges of $142.4 million. The non-cash charges consisted primarily of $93.4 million of stock-based compensation expense, $25.1 million of depreciation, and amortization expense and amortization of deferred contract acquisition costs, $4.7 million of non-cash operating lease costs and $16.8 million of other costs. The change in operating assets and liabilities was mainly driven by increases in accounts receivable of $94.6 million, inventory of $39.4 million, prepaid expenses and other assets of $38.0 million and operating lease liabilities of $5.0 million, offset by increases in deferred revenue of $51.8 million, accounts payable of $31.5 million and accrued and other liabilities of $29.4 million.
During the year ended January 31, 2022, net cash used in operating activities was $157.2 million, consisting primarily of a net loss of $132.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in net operating assets of $17.1 million and non-cash charges of $42.0 million. The non-cash charges consisted primarily of a $84.4 million change in the fair value of contingent earnout liability and a $57.1 million change in the fair value of warrant liabilities, offset by a $67.3 million stock-based compensation expense, a $16.5 million depreciation and amortization, and $7.0 million transaction costs related to the consummation of the Company’s officersMerger. The change in operating assets and directors may, but are not obligated to, loanliabilities was mainly driven by increases in deferred revenue of $55.3 million, accrued and other liabilities of $21.6 million and accounts payable of $7.9 million, partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $38.4 million and prepaid expenses and other assets of $23.9 million and a decrease in operating lease liabilities of $3.5 million.
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities
During the Company funds as may be required. If the Company completes an initial business combination, the Company would repay the Working Capital Loans outyear ended January 31, 2023, net cash used in investing activities was $126.2 million consisting of the proceedscash paid for purchases of the Trust Account releasedshort-term investments of $284.8 million, purchases of property and equipment of $18.6 million, and additional cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired) related to the Company. Otherwise,acquisition of HTB in the Working Capital Loans would be repaid only outprior year of $2.8 million, partially offset by cash received from maturities of short-term investments of $180.0 million.
During the year ended January 31, 2022, net cash provided by investing activities was $221.7 million, consisting of cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, of $205.3 million, partially offset by purchases of property and equipment of $16.4 million.
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
During the year ended January 31, 2023, net cash provided by financing activities was $372.9 million, consisting of net proceeds from the issuance of convertible debt of $294.0 million, proceeds from the sale of common stock under the ATM Facility, net of commissions and fees, of $49.5 million, proceeds from the issuance of common stock under employee equity plans, net of tax withholdings, of $11.4 million, proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants of $6.9 million, and change in driver funds held outsideand amounts due to customers of $11.1 million.
During the Trust Account. Inyear ended January 31, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities was $549.7 million, consisting of net proceeds from the event that an initialMerger and PIPE financing of $511.6 million, proceeds from the exercise of warrants of $118.9 million and proceeds from exercises of vested and unvested stock options of $4.9 million and change in driver funds and amounts due to customers of $3.7 million, partially offset by repayment of borrowings of $36.1 million, payment of transaction costs related to the Merger of $32.5 million and payment of tax withholding obligations on settlement of Earnout Shares of $20.9 million.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
ChargePoint’s material cash requirements include the following contractual obligations and commitments as of January 31, 2023. For more information regarding ChargePoint’s other contractual obligations, refer to Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, to its notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Operating Lease Obligations
ChargePoint has operating lease obligations for office spaces and data centers. As of January 31, 2023, ChargePoint had lease payment obligations of $32.8 million, with $6.7 million payable within twelve months.
Purchase Commitments
From time to time in the ordinary course of business, combinationChargePoint enters into agreements with vendors for the purchase of components and raw materials. However, due to contractual terms and variability in production levels, and opportunities to renegotiate pricing, ChargePoint generally does not close,have long-term binding and enforceable purchase orders under such contracts, and the Company may use a portiontiming and magnitude of proceeds held outside the Trust Accountpurchase orders beyond such period is difficult to repay the Working Capital Loans but no proceeds held in the Trust Account would be used to repay the Working Capital Loans. Except for the foregoing, the termsaccurately project.
54

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This management’s

Management’s discussion and analysis of ourChargePoint’s financial condition and results of operations is based on ourits consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of ourthese consolidated financial statements requires usChargePoint to make estimates and judgments that affectassumptions for the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues andrevenue, expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate ourrelated disclosures. ChargePoint’s estimates and judgments, including those related to fair value of financial instruments and accrued expenses. We base our estimatesare based on its historical experience known trends and events andon various other factors that we believe to beit believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying valuesvalue of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company has identifiedconditions and any such differences may be material.
While ChargePoint’s significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to its consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report, it believes the following asaccounting policies and estimates to be most critical to the preparation of its critical accounting policies:

Marketable Securities Heldconsolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition
ChargePoint recognizes revenue using the five-step model in Trust Account

Our portfolio of marketable securities is comprised solely of U.S. government securities, within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16)determining revenue recognition: (a) identification of the Investment Company Act,contract, or contracts, with a maturitycustomer; (b) identification of 185 daysthe performance obligations in the contract; (c) determination of the transaction price; (d) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (e) recognition of revenue when, or less, classified as, trading securities. Trading securitiesit satisfies a performance obligation.

ChargePoint enters into contracts with customers that regularly include promises to transfer multiple products and services, such as Networked Charging Systems, software subscriptions, extended maintenance, and professional services. For arrangements with multiple products and services, ChargePoint evaluates whether the individual products and services qualify as distinct performance obligations. In ChargePoint’s assessment of whether products and services are presenteda distinct performance obligation, it determines whether the customer can benefit from the product or service on its own or with other readily available resources and whether the service is separately identifiable from other products or services in the contract. This evaluation requires ChargePoint to assess the nature of each of its Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions and other offerings and how they are provided in the context of the contract, including whether they are significantly integrated which may require judgment based on the balance sheetsfacts and circumstances of the contract.
The transaction price for each contract is determined based on the amount ChargePoint expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for transferring the promised products or services to the customer. Collectability of revenue is reasonably assured based on historical evidence of collectability of fees ChargePoint charges its customers. The transaction price in the contract is allocated to each distinct performance obligation in an amount that represents the relative amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for satisfying each performance obligation. Revenue is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied. Revenue is recorded based on the transaction price excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties such as sales taxes, which are collected on behalf of and remitted to governmental authorities, or driver fees, which are collected on behalf of customers who offer public charging for a fee.
When agreements involve multiple distinct performance obligations, ChargePoint accounts for individual performance obligations separately. ChargePoint applies significant judgment in identifying and accounting for each performance obligation as a result of evaluating terms and conditions in contracts. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis. ChargePoint determines SSP based on observable standalone selling price when it is available, as well as other factors, including the price charged to its customers, its discounting practices and its overall pricing objectives, while maximizing observable inputs. In situations where pricing is highly variable, or a product is never sold on a stand-alone basis, ChargePoint estimates the SSP using the residual approach.
Areas of Judgment and Estimates
Determining whether the Networked Charging Systems, Cloud, Assure and professional services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately or as a single performance obligation requires significant judgment. In reaching its conclusion, ChargePoint assesses the nature of each individual service offering and how the services are provided in the context of the contract, including whether the services are significantly integrated, which may require judgment based on the facts and circumstances of the contract.
Determining the relative SSP for contracts that contain multiple performance obligations requires significant judgment. ChargePoint determines SSP using observable pricing when available, which takes into consideration market conditions and customer specific factors while maximizing observable inputs. When observable pricing is not available, ChargePoint applies the residual approach to estimate the SSP. After establishing the SSP, ChargePoint then allocates the transaction price using the relative selling price method.
55

Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory levels are analyzed periodically and written down to their net realizable value if they have become obsolete, have a cost basis in excess of expected net realizable value or are in excess of expected demand. ChargePoint analyzes current and future product demand relative to the remaining product life to identify potential excess inventories. These forecasts of future demand are based upon historical trends and adjusted for overall market conditions. Inventory write-downs are measured as the difference between the cost of the inventory and its net realizable value, and charged to inventory reserves, which is a component of cost of revenue. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for those inventories is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.
Business Combination
Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of a business acquisition are generally recorded at their estimated fair value at the enddate of each reporting period. Gainsacquisition. The excess of purchase price over the amount allocated to the assets acquired and losses resulting fromliabilities assumed, if any, is recorded as goodwill. In determining the change in fair value of these securitiesassets acquired, including intangible assets, and liabilities assumed, ChargePoint utilizes a variety of methods. Each asset acquired and liability assumed is included in gain on marketable securities (net), dividends and interest, held in Trust Account inmeasured at fair value from the accompanying statementperspective of operations.a market participant. The estimatedmethod used to estimate the fair values of marketable securities heldintangible assets incorporates significant estimates and assumptions regarding the estimates a market participant would make in Trust Account are determinedorder to evaluate an asset, including a market participant’s use of the asset, future cash inflows and outflows, probabilities of success, asset lives and the appropriate discount rates. This judgment and determination affects the amount of consideration paid that is allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business purchase transaction. The Company engages third-party appraisal firms to assist in determining fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed when appropriate.
During the remeasurement period, which extends no later than one year from the acquisition date, ChargePoint may record certain adjustments to the carrying value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with a corresponding offset to goodwill.
Stock-based Compensation
Determining the grant date fair value of employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) rights using available market information.

Class A Common Stock Subjectthe Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires management to Possible Redemption

Class A common stock subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instrumentsmake certain assumptions and arejudgments. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties, and, if different assumptions had been used, stock-based compensation expense could have been materially different from the amounts recorded. Stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value. Conditionally redeemable Class A common stock (including Class A common stock that feature redemption rights that are either within the controlvalue of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within our control) are classifiedaward and is recognized as temporary equity. At all other times, Class A common stock are classified as stockholders’ equity. Our Class A common stock feature certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of our control and subject to the occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, at December 31, 2019, 30,047,981 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption are presented as temporary equity, outside of the stockholders’ equity section of the Company’s balance sheet.

49

Net Income (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

Net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common stock outstanding during the periods. We have not considered the effect of the Warrants sold in the Public Offering (including the consummation of the overallotment) and Private Placement to purchase an aggregate of 15,992,155 shares of our Class A common stock in the calculation of diluted income per share, since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method.

Our statement of operations includes a presentation of income per share for common stock subject to redemption in a manner similar to the two-class method of income per share. Net income per share, basic and diluted for Class A common stock is calculated by dividing the gain on marketable securities, dividends and interest held in the Trust Account of approximately $2.3 million,expense, net of applicable taxesestimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. ChargePoint estimates the forfeiture rate based on the historical experience at the date of grant and funds available to be withdrawnrevises it, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from the Trust Account for tax obligations of approximately $567,000, resulted to an aggregate of approximately $1.7 million, by the weighted average number of Class A commonthose estimates. For performance-based stock outstanding for the period of 31,092,978 shares. Net loss per share, basic and diluted for Class B common stock is calculated by dividing the net income of approximately $780,000, less income attributable to Public Shares of approximately $1.7 million, resulted to a net loss of approximately $935,000, by the weighted average number of Class B common stock outstanding for the period of 7,852,941 shares.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Boardoptions issued, Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception. The ASU allows companies to exclude a down round feature when determining whether a financial instrument (or embedded conversion feature) is considered indexed to the entity’s own stock. As a result, financial instruments (or embedded conversion features) with down round features may no longer be required to be classified as liabilities. A company will recognize the value of a down round feature only when it is triggered and the strike price has been adjusted downward. For equity-classified freestanding financial instruments, such as warrants, an entity will treat the value of the effect ofaward is measured at the down round, when triggered,grant date as a dividend and a reduction of income available to common shareholders in computing basic earnings per share. For convertible instruments with embedded conversion features containing down round provisions, entities will recognize the fair value of the down roundaward and is expensed over the requisite service period, using the accelerated attribution method, once the performance condition becomes probable of being achieved. These inputs are subjective and generally required significant analysis and judgment to develop.

The determination of the grant date fair value of ESPP rights issued is affected by a number of variables, including the expected Common Stock price volatility over the term of the award, the expected term of the award, risk-free interest rates, and the expected dividend yield of ChargePoint Common Stock.
Expected volatility: The expected volatility for the ESPP rights was determined by using a blended volatility approach of peer volatility and implied volatility. Peer volatility was calculated as a beneficial conversion discountthe average of historical volatilities of selected industry peers deemed to be amortizedcomparable to earnings. The guidance in ASU 2017-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted this guidance at inception. As a result,ChargePoint’s business corresponding to the Warrants issued in connection with the Public Offering and the saleexpected term of the Private Placement Warrantsawards.
Risk-free interest rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for zero-coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities corresponding to our Sponsor was equity-classified.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, “Incomeexpected term of the awards.

Expected dividend yield: The expected dividend rate is zero as ChargePoint currently has no history or expectation of declaring dividends on its Common Stock.
Expected term: The expected term represented the period the ESPP rights were expected to remain outstanding and is based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules, and expectations of future employee behavior.
Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying
ChargePoint utilizes the Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASU 2019-12”), which is intended to simplify various aspects related toasset and liability method in accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptionsDeferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the estimated future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
56

temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax expense or benefit is the result of changes in the deferred tax asset and liability. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets where it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. ChargePoint makes estimates, assumptions and judgments to determine its provision for its income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. ChargePoint assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidanceextent it believes that recovery is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Companynot likely, it establishes a valuation allowance.
ChargePoint recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is currently evaluatingmore likely than not that the impact of this standardtax position will be sustained on its financial statements and related disclosures.

We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on our financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2019, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

50

JOBS Act

On April 5, 2012,examination by the JOBS Act was signed into law. The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act and are allowed to comply with new or revised accounting pronouncementstaxing authorities, based on the effective date for private (not publicly traded) companies. We elected to delaytechnical merits of the adoption of new or revised accounting standards, and as a result, we may not comply with new or revised accounting standardsposition. The tax benefits recognized from such positions are then measured based on the relevant dates onlargest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits which, adoptionhave not been material, are recognized within provision for income taxes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2,Summary of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. As a result, ourSignificant Accounting Policies, of the consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with new or revisedincluded elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding recently issued accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.

As an “emerging growth company,” we are not required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting, (ii) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies, (iii) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the PCAOB regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis), and (iv) disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the CEO’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply for a period of five years following the completion of our Public Offering or until we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” whichever is earlier.

pronouncements.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

WeRisk

Interest Rate Risk
ChargePoint is exposed to market risk for changes in interest rates. ChargePoint had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash totaling $294.6 million and short-term investments of $105.0 million as of January 31, 2023. Cash equivalents were invested primarily in money market funds. ChargePoint’s investment policy is focused on the preservation of capital and supporting its liquidity needs. Under the policy, ChargePoint invests in highly rated securities, issued by the U.S. government, and short durations or liquid money market funds. ChargePoint does not invest in financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, nor does it use leveraged financial instruments. ChargePoint utilizes external investment managers who adhere to the guidelines of its investment policy. A hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not have a material impact on the value of ChargePoint’s cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. There was no material change in ChargePoint’s interest rate risk during fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022.
Foreign Currency Risk
ChargePoint has foreign currency risks related to its revenue and operating expenses denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro, causing both its revenue and its operating results to be impacted by fluctuations in the exchange rates. As ChargePoint’s foreign operations expand, its results may be more materially impacted by fluctuations in the exchange rates of the currencies in which it does business.
Gains or losses from the revaluation of certain cash balances, accounts receivable balances and intercompany balances that are denominated in these currencies can impact ChargePoint’s net loss. A hypothetical decrease in all foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar of 10% would not result in a smaller reporting companymaterial foreign currency loss on foreign-denominated balances, as definedof January 31, 2023. There was no material change in Rule 12b-2 underChargePoint’s foreign currency risk during fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 compared to fiscal year ended January 31, 2022.
At this time, ChargePoint does not enter into financial instruments to hedge its foreign currency exchange risk, but it may in the Exchange Act. As a result, pursuant to Item 305(e)future.
57

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


58


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation

Opinion ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements

and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Switchback Energy Acquisition CorporationChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of DecemberJanuary 31, 2019,2023 and 2022, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’of comprehensive loss, of redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity (deficit) and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period from May 10, 2019 (inception) through Decemberended January 31, 2019, and2023, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial“consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of DecemberJanuary 31, 2019,2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period from May 10, 2019 (inception) through Decemberended January 31, 2019,2023 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis Also in our opinion, the Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO because material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting existed as of that date related to the Company not designing and maintaining (i) effective controls over certain information technology general controls for Opinion

These financial statementsinformation systems that are relevant to the responsibilitypreparation of the Company’s management.consolidated financial statements, including effective controls over program change management, user access, and program development and (ii) effective controls over segregation of duties.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses referred to above are described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. We considered these material weaknesses in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the January 31, 2023 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in management's report referred to above. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial statementsreporting based on our audit.audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding offraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectivenesswas maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the entity's internal control overconsolidated financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our auditstatements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our auditaudits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
59

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Consolidated Financial Statements – Impact of Personnel and Controls Related to Financial Reporting
The completeness and accuracy of the consolidated financial statements, including the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, is dependent on, in part, (i) maintaining a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate degree of accounting knowledge, experience and training to appropriately analyze, record and disclose accounting matters; (ii) designing and maintaining formal accounting policies, procedures and controls over significant accounts and disclosures to achieve complete, accurate and timely financial accounting, reporting and disclosures, including accounting for complex features associated with warrants and adequate controls related to the preparation and review of journal entries; (iii) designing and maintaining controls over segregation of duties; and (iv) designing and maintaining controls over information technology general controls for information systems that are relevant for the Company’s financial statements, including controls over program change management, user access, and program development.
The principal considerations for our determination that the consolidated financial statements - impact of personnel and controls related to financial reporting is a critical audit matter are a high degree of auditor subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to business processes that affect substantially all financial statement account balances and disclosures. As disclosed by management, material weaknesses existed during the year related to management not designing and maintaining (i) a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate degree of accounting knowledge, experience and training to appropriately analyze, record and disclose accounting matters and (ii) formal accounting policies, procedures and controls over significant accounts and disclosures to achieve complete, accurate and timely financial accounting, reporting and disclosures, including accounting for complex features associated with warrants and adequate controls related to the preparation and review of journal entries. As described in the “Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting” section, material weaknesses related to not designing and maintaining (i) effective controls over certain information technology general controls for information systems that are relevant to the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including effective controls over program change management, user access, and program development and (ii) effective controls over segregation of duties existed as of January 31, 2023 related to this matter.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, evaluating and determining the nature and extent of audit procedures performed and evidence obtained that are responsive to the material weaknesses identified. These procedures also included (i) manually testing the completeness and accuracy of system reports or other information generated by the Company’s information systems; (ii) evaluating whether segregation of duties was maintained; and (iii) evaluating whether management designed and maintained formal accounting policies, procedures and controls over significant accounts and disclosures to achieve complete, accurate and timely financial accounting, reporting and disclosures, including accounting for complex features associated with warrants and adequate controls related to the preparation and review of journal entries.


/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
April 3, 2023
We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 2019.

New York, New York

March 30, 2020

2016.

60


Table of ContentSWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEET

  December 31,
2019
 
Assets:   
Current assets:   
Cash $398,721 
Prepaid expenses  374,286 
Total current assets  773,007 
Marketable securities held in Trust Account  316,398,889 

Total Assets

 $317,171,896 
     
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:    
Current liabilities:    
Accounts payable $200,971 
Franchise tax payable  87,928 
Income tax payable  479,064 
Total current liabilities  767,963 
Deferred underwriting commissions  10,924,117 
Total liabilities  11,692,080 
     
Commitments and Contingencies    
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value; 30,047,981 shares subject to possible redemption at $10.00 per share  300,479,810 
     
Stockholders’ Equity:    
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding  - 
Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 1,363,782 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 30,047,981 shares subject to possible redemption)  136 
Class B common stock, $0.0001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 7,852,941 shares issued and outstanding  785 
Additional paid-in capital  4,219,513 
Retained earnings  779,572 
Total stockholders’ equity  5,000,006 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $317,171,896 

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
January 31, 2023 and 2022
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
January 31,
20232022
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$264,162 $315,235 
Restricted cash30,400 400 
Short-term investments104,966 — 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $10,000 as of January 31, 2023 and $5,584 as of January 31, 2022164,892 75,939 
Inventories68,730 35,879 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets71,020 36,603 
Total current assets704,170 464,056 
Property and equipment, net40,046 34,593 
Intangible assets, net92,673 107,209 
Operating lease right-of-use assets22,242 25,535 
Goodwill213,716 218,484 
Other assets7,110 6,020 
Total assets$1,079,957 $855,897 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$62,076 $27,576 
Accrued and other current liabilities133,483 84,328 
Deferred revenue88,777 77,142 
Total current liabilities284,336 189,046 
Deferred revenue, noncurrent109,833 69,666 
Debt, noncurrent294,936 — 
Operating lease liabilities21,841 25,370 
Deferred tax liabilities12,987 17,697 
Other long-term liabilities1,032 7,104 
Total liabilities724,965 308,883 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock: $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized as of each of January 31, 2023 and 2022; 348,330,481 and 334,760,615 shares issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively35 33 
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized as of each of January 31, 2023 and 2022; zero shares issued and outstanding as of each of January 31, 2023 and 2022— — 
Additional paid-in capital1,528,104 1,366,855 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(16,384)(8,219)
Accumulated deficit(1,156,763)(811,655)
Total stockholders' equity354,992 547,014 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$1,079,957 $855,897 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

61


Table of ContentSWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

  For The Period From May 10,
2019 (Inception) Through
December 31,
2019
 
General and administrative expenses $934,695 
Franchise tax expense  87,928 
Loss from operations  1,022,623
Gain on marketable securities, dividends and interest held in Trust Account  2,281,259 
Income before income tax expense  1,258,636 
Income tax expense  479,064 
Net income $779,572 
     
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, Class A  31,092,978 
Basic and diluted net income per share, Class A $0.06 
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, Class B  7,852,941 
Basic and diluted net loss per share, Class B $(0.12)

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
Revenue
Networked charging systems$363,622 $173,850 $91,893 
Subscriptions85,296 53,512 40,563 
Other19,176 13,644 14,034 
Total revenue468,094 241,006 146,490 
Cost of revenue
Networked charging systems318,628 147,313 87,083 
Subscriptions51,416 31,190 20,385 
Other12,117 8,970 6,073 
Total cost of revenue382,161 187,473 113,541 
Gross profit85,933 53,533 32,949 
Operating expenses
Research and development194,957 145,043 75,017 
Sales and marketing142,392 92,550 53,002 
General and administrative90,366 81,380 25,922 
Total operating expenses427,715 318,973 153,941 
Loss from operations(341,782)(265,440)(120,992)
Interest income5,534 98 315 
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount and issuance cost(9,434)(1,502)(3,253)
Change in fair value of redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability— 9,237 (73,125)
Change in fair value of assumed common stock warrant liabilities(24)47,822 — 
Change in fair value of contingent earnout liability— 84,420 — 
Transaction costs expensed— (7,031)— 
Other income (expense), net(1,569)(2,775)229 
Net loss before income taxes$(347,275)$(135,171)$(196,826)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(2,167)(2,930)198 
Net loss$(345,108)$(132,241)$(197,024)
Accretion of beneficial conversion feature of redeemable convertible preferred stock— — (60,377)
Cumulative undeclared dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock— (4,292)(16,799)
Deemed dividends attributable to vested option holders— (51,855)— 
Deemed dividends attributable to common stock warrant holders— (110,635)— 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders - Basic$(345,108)$(299,023)$(274,200)
Gain attributable to earnout shares issued— (84,420)— 
Change in fair value of dilutive warrants— (68,223)— 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders - Diluted$(345,108)$(451,666)$(274,200)
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic338,488,667 297,421,969 15,116,763 
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted338,488,667 302,490,266 15,116,763 
Net loss per share - Basic$(1.02)$(1.01)$(18.14)
Net loss per share - Diluted$(1.02)$(1.49)$(18.14)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

statements

62


Table of ContentSWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For The Period From May 10, 2019 (Inception) Through December

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
Years Ended January 31, 2019

  Common Stock  Additional     Total 
  Class A  Class B  Paid-In  Retained  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Earnings  Equity 
Balance - May 10, 2019 (inception)  -  $-   -  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Issuance of Class B common stock to Sponsor(1)  -   -   8,625,000   863   24,137   -   25,000 
Sale of units in initial public offering, gross  31,411,763   3,141   -   -   314,114,489   -   314,117,630 
Offering costs  -   -   -   -   (17,724,739)  -   (17,724,739)
Sale of private placement warrants to Sponsor in private placement  -   -   -   -   8,282,353   -   8,282,353 
Forfeiture of Class B common stock(1)  -   -   (772,059)  (78)  78   -   - 
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption  (30,047,981)  (3,005)  -   -   (300,476,805)  -   (300,479,810)
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   779,572   779,572 
Balance - December 31, 2019  1,363,782  $136   7,852,941  $785  $4,219,513  $779,572  $5,000,006 

(1)Includes up to 1,125,000 shares of Class B common stock subject to forfeiture if the over-allotment option is not exercised in full or in part by the underwriters. On September 6, 2019, the underwriters partially purchased the over-allotment units, and the remaining over-allotment option subsequently expired. As a result, an aggregate of 772,059 Founder Shares were forfeited accordingly.

2023, 2022, and 2021

(in thousands)
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
Net loss$(345,108)$(132,241)$(197,024)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax(7,716)(8,374)141 
Available-for-sale short-term investments:
Unrealized loss on short-term investments, net of tax(449)— — 
Reclassification to net income, net of tax— — (23)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(8,165)(8,374)118 
Comprehensive loss$(353,273)$(140,615)$(196,906)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

63


Table of ContentSWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

  For The Period From May 10,
2019 (Inception) Through December 31,
2019
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Net income $779,572 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:    
General and administrative expenses paid by related parties  125,151 
Gain on marketable securities, dividends and interest held in Trust Account  (2,281,259)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:    
Prepaid expenses  (374,286)
Accounts payable  186,470 
Franchise tax payable  87,928 
Income tax payable  479,064 
Net cash used in operating activities  (997,360)
     
Cash Flows from Investing Activities    
Cash deposited in Trust Account  (314,117,630)
Net cash used in investing activities  (314,117,630)
     
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:    
Proceeds from issuance of Class B common stock to Sponsor  25,000 
Repayment of loans from related party  (251,375)
Proceeds received from initial public offering, gross  314,117,630 
Proceeds received from private placement  8,282,353 
Offering costs paid  (6,659,897)
Net cash provided by financing activities  315,513,711 
     
Net change in cash  398,721 
     
Cash - beginning of the period  - 
Cash - end of the period $398,721 
     
Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:    
Offering costs included in accounts payable $14,501 
Offering costs paid by related party under note payable from related party $126,224 
Deferred underwriting commissions $10,924,117 
Forfeiture of Class B common stock $78 
Class A common stock subject to possible redemption $300,479,810 

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Years Ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021
(in thousands, except share data)
Redeemable
Convertible
Preferred Stock
Common StockAdditional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Accumulated
Deficit
Total
Stockholders'
Equity (Deficit)
SharesAmountSharesAmount
Balances as of January 31, 2020160,583,203 $520,241 11,918,418 $1 $20,331 $37 $(482,390)$(462,021)
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock and common warrants, net of issuance costs22,351,054 95,456 — — — — — — 
Issuance of common stock warrants in connection with Series H-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock— — — — 31,547 — — 31,547 
Beneficial conversion feature in connection with Series H-1 redeemable preferred stock— (60,377)— — 60,377 — — 60,377 
Accretion of beneficial conversion feature in connection with Series H-1 redeemable preferred stock— 60,377 — — (60,377)— — (60,377)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of vested stock options— — 10,363,603 5,643 — — 5,644 
Issuance of common stock related to early exercise of stock options— — 679,011 — — — — — 
Vesting of early exercised stock options— — — — 268 — — 268 
Stock-based compensation— — — — 4,947 — — 4,947 
Net loss— — — — — — (197,024)(197,024)
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 118 — 118 
Balances as of January 31, 2021182,934,257 $615,697 22,961,032 $2 $62,736 $155 $(679,414)$(616,521)
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock into common stock in connection with the reverse recapitalization, including impact of Series H-1 paid in kind dividend(182,934,257)(615,697)194,060,336 20 615,677 — — 615,697 
Issuance of common stock under stock plans, net of tax withholdings— — 8,620,607 — 4,516 — — 4,516 
Reclassification of Legacy ChargePoint preferred stock warrant liability upon the reverse recapitalization— — — — 66,606 — — 66,606 
Issuance of common stock upon the reverse recapitalization, net of issuance costs— — 60,746,989 200,460 — — 200,466 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants— — 16,364,810 352,612 — — 352,613 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to business combinations— — 5,695,176 102,057 — — 102,058 
Issuance of earnout shares upon triggering events, net of tax withholding— — 26,313,253 480,222 — — 480,225 
Contingent earnout liability recognized upon the closing of the reverse recapitalization— — — — (828,180)— — (828,180)
Reclassification of remaining contingent earnout liability upon triggering event— — — — 242,640 — — 242,640 
Vesting of early exercised stock options— — — — 178 — — 178 
Repurchase of early exercised common stock— — (1,588)— — — — 
Stock-based compensation— — — — 67,331 — — 67,331 
Net loss— — — — — — (132,241)(132,241)
Other comprehensive loss     (8,374) (8,374)
Balances as of January 31, 2022 $ 334,760,615 $33 $1,366,855 $(8,219)$(811,655)$547,014 
Issuance of common stock under stock plans, net of tax withholdings— — 7,267,807 2,501 — — 2,502 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants— — 1,041,533 — 6,932 — — 6,932 
Issuance of common stock upon ESPP purchase— — 607,384 — 8,947 — — 8,947 
Issuance of common stock in connection with ATM offerings, net of issuance costs— — 4,657,806 49,449 — — 49,450 
Vesting of early exercised stock options— — — — 69 — — 69 
64

Redeemable
Convertible
Preferred Stock
Common StockAdditional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Accumulated
Deficit
Total
Stockholders'
Equity (Deficit)
SharesAmountSharesAmount
Repurchase of early exercised common stock— — (4,664)— — — — 
Stock-based compensation— — — — 93,351 — — 93,351 
Net loss— — — — — — (345,108)(345,108)
Other comprehensive loss— — — — — (8,165)— (8,165)
Balances as of January 31, 2023 $ 348,330,481 $35 $1,528,104 $(16,384)$(1,156,763)$354,992 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

65

SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021
(in thousands)
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss$(345,108)$(132,241)$(197,024)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization25,050 16,457 10,083 
Non-cash operating lease cost4,739 4,244 3,762 
Stock-based compensation93,350 67,331 4,947 
Amortization of deferred contract acquisition costs2,361 1,786 1,206 
Transaction costs expensed— 7,031 — 
Change in fair value of common stock warrant liabilities24 (47,822)— 
Change in fair value of redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability— (9,237)73,125 
Change in fair value of contingent earnout liabilities— (84,420)— 
Change in fair value of earnout liability recognized upon acquisition of ViriCiti— 2,266 — 
Other16,832 374 1,858 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable, net(94,600)(38,388)3,292 
Inventories(39,358)(1,991)(9,585)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(37,969)(23,941)(8,914)
Operating lease liabilities(5,043)(3,460)(2,815)
Accounts payable31,476 7,933 (493)
Accrued and other liabilities29,394 21,619 11,556 
Deferred revenue51,803 55,281 17,156 
Net cash used in operating activities(267,049)(157,178)(91,846)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment(18,563)(16,410)(11,484)
Purchases of investments(284,835)— — 
Maturities of investments180,000 — 47,014 
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired(2,756)(205,330)— 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(126,154)(221,740)35,530 
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock— — 95,456 
Proceeds from the exercise of public warrants6,884 118,864 — 
Merger and PIPE financing— 511,646 — 
Payment of tax withholding obligations on settlement of earnout shares— (20,895)— 
Repayment of borrowings— (36,051)— 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock warrants, net of issuance costs— — 31,547 
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of issuance costs293,972 — — 
Payments of transaction costs related to Merger— (32,468)— 
Change in driver funds and amounts due to customers11,107 3,675 — 
Payment of deferred transaction costs— — (4,003)
Proceeds from issuance of stock in connection with stock plans, net of withholding taxes11,446 4,916 5,913 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with ATM offerings49,450 — — 
Net cash provided by financing activities372,859 549,687 128,913 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash(729)(1,025)141 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash(21,073)169,744 72,738 
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period315,635 145,891 73,153 
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period$294,562 $315,635 $145,891 
66

Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
Supplementary cash flow information
Cash paid for interest$4,929 $346 $2,801 
Cash paid for taxes$598 $268 $172 
Supplementary cash flow information on non-cash investing and financing activities
Accretion of beneficial conversion feature of redeemable convertible preferred stock$— $— $60,377 
Deferred transaction costs not yet paid$— $— $1,685 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities$— $7,991 $2,118 
Right-of-use asset remeasurement subsequent to lease extension$— $— $12,867 
Acquisitions of property and equipment included in accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities$1,954 $660 $647 
Vesting of early exercised stock options$69 $178 $268 
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock into common stock in connection with the reverse recapitalization$— $615,697 $— 
Reclassification of Legacy ChargePoint redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability upon the reverse capitalization$— $66,606 $— 
Contingent earnout liability recognized upon the closing of the reverse recapitalization$— $828,180 $— 
Reclassification of remaining contingent earnout liability upon triggering event$— $242,640 $— 
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisitions$— $102,057 $— 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
67

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS

Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (“ChargePoint” or the “Company”, “it”, “its”) designs, develops and markets networked electric vehicle (“EV”) charging system infrastructure (“Networked Charging Systems”), connected through cloud-based services (“Cloud” or “Cloud Services”) which (i) enable charging system owners, or hosts, to manage their Networked Charging Systems, and (ii) enable drivers to locate, reserve and authenticate Networked Charging Systems, and to transact EV charging sessions on those systems. ChargePoint’s Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions and other offerings provide an open platform that integrates with system hardware from ChargePoint and other manufacturers, connecting systems over an intelligent network that provides real-time information about charging sessions and full control, support and management of the Networked Charging Systems. This network provides multiple web-based portals for charging system owners, fleet managers, drivers and utilities. In addition, the Company offers a range of extended warranties (“Assure”), as well as its ChargePoint as a Service (“CPaaS”) program which bundles use of ChargePoint owned and operated systems with Cloud Services, Assure and other benefits into one subscription.
On September 23, 2020, ChargePoint, Inc. entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation (“Switchback”).
On February 26, 2021 (the “Company”“Closing Date”) was, Switchback consummated the previously announced transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement pursuant to which Lightning Merger Sub Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Switchback incorporated in the State of Delaware on May 10, 2019. The Company was formed for(“Merger Sub”), merged with ChargePoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Legacy ChargePoint”); Legacy ChargePoint survived as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Switchback (the “Merger” and, collectively with the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses (the “Business Combination”). Although the Company is not limited to a particular industry or sector for purposes of consummating a Business Combination, the Company intends to focus its search for a target businessother transactions described in the energy industryMerger Agreement, the “Reverse Recapitalization”). On the Closing Date, and in North America. The Company is an emerging growth company and, as such, the Company is subject to all of the risks associated with emerging growth companies.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had not commenced any operations. All activity for the period from May 10, 2019 (inception) through December 31, 2019 relates to the Company’s formation and the initial public offering (the “Initial Public Offering”), and, since the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the search for a prospective initial Business Combination.

The Company’s sponsor is NGP Switchback, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Sponsor”). The registration statement for the Initial Public Offering was declared effective on July 25, 2019. On July 30, 2019, the Company consummated the Initial Public Offering of 30,000,000 units (the “Units” and, with respect to the Class A common stock included in the Units, the “Public Shares”) at $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $300.0 million. The underwriters were granted a 45-day option from the date of the final prospectus relating to the Initial Public Offering to purchase up to 4,500,000 additional Units to cover over-allotments, if any, at $10.00 per Unit, less underwriting discounts and commissions. On September 4, 2019, the underwriters partially exercised the over-allotment option and, on September 6, 2019, the underwriters purchased an additional 1,411,763 units (the “Over-allotment Units”), generating gross proceeds of approximately $14.1 million, and the remaining over-allotment option subsequently expired. The Company incurred offering costs of approximately of approximately $17.7 million, inclusive of $10.9 million in deferred underwriting commissions (Note 5).

Simultaneouslyconnection with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Company consummated the saleMerger (the “Private Placement”“Closing”) of 5,333,333 warrants (each, a “Private Placement Warrant” and collectively, the “Private Placement Warrants”) at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant in a private placement, Switchback changed its name to the Sponsor, generating gross proceeds of approximately $8.0 million (Note 4). Simultaneously with the closingChargePoint Holdings, Inc. As part of the sale of the Over-allotment Units, the SponsorMerger, certain investors purchased an additional 188,235 Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant, generating gross proceeds of approximately $282,000.

Approximately $314.1 million ($10.00 per Unit) of the net proceeds of the Initial Public Offering (including the Over-allotment Units) and certain of the proceeds of the Private Placement was placed in a trust account (“Trust Account”) located in the United States with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company acting as trustee, and invested only in U.S. “government securities,” within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), with a maturity of 185 days or less, or in money market funds meeting the conditions of paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3) and (d)(4) of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act, which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations, as determined by the Company, until the earlier of: (i) the completion of a Business Combination and (ii) the distribution of the Trust Account as described below.

The Company’s management has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of the Initial Public Offering and the sale of Private Placement Warrants, although substantially all of the net proceeds are intended to be applied generally toward consummating a Business Combination. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to complete a Business Combination successfully. The Company must complete one or more initial Business Combinations having an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the net assets held in the Trust Account (net of amounts disbursed to management for working capital purposes and excluding the amount of any deferred underwriting discount held in trust) at the time of the agreement to enter into the initial Business Combination. However, the Company will only complete a Business Combination if the post-transaction company owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.


SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company will provide holders of the Company’s outstanding Public Shares (the “Public Stockholders”) with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their Public Shares (as defined below) upon the completion of a Business Combination either (i) in connection with a stockholder meeting called to approve the Business Combination or (ii) by means of a tender offer. The decision as to whether the Company will seek stockholder approval of a Business Combination or conduct a tender offer will be made by the Company, solely in its discretion. The Public Stockholders will be entitled to redeem their Public Shares for a pro rata portion of the amount then held in the Trust Account (initially anticipated to be $10.00 per Public Share). The per-share amount to be distributed to Public Stockholders who redeem their Public Shares will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commissions the Company will pay to the underwriters (as discussed in Note 5). These Public Shares were recorded at a redemption value and classified as temporary equity upon the completion of the Initial Public Offering. In such case, the Company will only proceed with a Business Combination if, among other things, the Company has net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 upon consummation of such Business Combination and a majority of the shares voted are voted in favor of the Business Combination. If a stockholder vote is not required by law and the Company does not decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other legal reasons, the Company will, pursuant to its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), conduct the redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and file tender offer documents with the SEC prior to completing a Business Combination. If, however, stockholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or the Company decides to obtain stockholder approval for business or legal reasons, the Company will offer to redeem shares in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to the proxy rules and not pursuant to the tender offer rules. Additionally, each public stockholder may elect to redeem its Public Shares irrespective of whether they vote for or against the proposed transaction. If the Company seeks stockholder approval in connection with a Business Combination, the Initial Stockholders (as defined below) have agreed to vote their Founder Shares (as defined below in Note 4) and any Public Shares purchased during or after the Initial Public Offering in favor of a Business Combination. In addition, the Initial Stockholders have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to their Founder Shares and Public Shares in connection with the completion of a Business Combination.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Certificate of Incorporation provides that a public stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), will be restricted from redeeming its shares with respect to more than an aggregate of 20%22,500,000 shares of common stock (“PIPE Investors”) concurrently with the Public Shares.

Closing for an aggregate purchase price of $225.0 million.

The SponsorCompany’s fiscal year ends on January 31. References to fiscal years 2023, 2022, and the Company’s officers and directors (the “Initial Stockholders”) have agreed not to propose an amendment2021 relate to the Certificate of Incorporation that would affect the substance or timing of the Company’s obligation to redeem 100% of the Public Shares if the Company does not complete a Business Combination within the time frame described below, unless the Company provides the Public Stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their Public Shares in conjunction with any such amendment.

If the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination within 24 months from the closing of the Initial Public Offering, or July 30,fiscal years ended January 31, 2023, January 31, 2022, and January 31, 2021, (the “Combination Period”), the Company will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company to pay its franchise and income taxes (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then-outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will completely extinguish Public Stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of the Company’s remaining stockholders and its board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to the Company’s obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.

respectively.

SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Initial Stockholders have agreed to waive their liquidation rights with respect to the Founder Shares if the Company fails to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period. However, the Initial Stockholders will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to any Public Shares that they hold if the Company fails to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period. The underwriters have agreed to waive their rights to the deferred underwriting commission (see Note 5) held in the Trust Account in the event the Company does not complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period and, in such event, such amounts will be included with the other funds held in the Trust Account that will be available to fund the redemption of the Public Shares. In the event of such distribution, it is possible that the per share value of the residual assets remaining available for distribution (including Trust Account assets) will be only $10.00. In order to protect the amounts held in the Trust Account, the Sponsor has agreed to be liable to the Company if and to the extent any claims by a third party (except for the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm) for services rendered or products sold to the Company, or a prospective target business with which the Company has entered into a letter of intent, confidentiality or other similar agreement or business combination agreement (a “Target”), reduce the amount of funds in the Trust Account to below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per Public Share and (ii) the actual amount per Public Share held in the Trust Account due to reductions in the value of the trust assets as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, in each case including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to the Company to pay its franchise and income taxes, less franchise and income taxes payable. This liability will not apply with respect to any claims by a third party or Target that executed an agreement waiving claims against and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account whether or not such agreement is enforceable or to any claims under the Company’s indemnity of the underwriters of the Initial Public Offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The Company will seek to reduce the possibility that the Sponsor will have to indemnify the Trust Account due to claims of creditors by endeavoring to have all vendors, service providers, prospective target businesses or other entities with which the Company does business, execute agreements with the Company waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to monies held in the Trust Account.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanyingconsolidated financial statements are presentedand accompanying notes have been prepared in U.S. dollars in conformityaccordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and pursuant to. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the rules and regulationsaccounts of the SEC.

Emerging Growth Company

and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of continuity of operations, the realization of assets, and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Since inception, the Company is an “emerging growth company,” as definedhas been engaged in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”),developing and marketing its Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions and other offerings, raising capital, and recruiting personnel and it may take advantagehas incurred net operating losses and negative cash flows from operations in every year since inception and expects this to continue for the foreseeable future. As of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply withJanuary 31, 2023, the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirementsCompany had an accumulated deficit of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

Further, section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. $1,156.8 million.

The Company has elected not to opt outfunded its operations primarily with proceeds from the issuance of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revisedredeemable convertible preferred stock, convertible notes, exercise proceeds from options and it has different application dates for public or private companies,warrants, borrowings under its loan facilities, customer payments, proceeds from sale of Common Stock under the ATM Facility, and proceeds from the Merger. In February 2021, the Company received cash proceeds of $484.1 million from the Merger. The Company had cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and short-term investments of $399.5 million as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard.

This may make comparisonof January 31, 2023. As of the Company’sdate on which these consolidated financial statements were issued, the Company believes that its cash on hand, together with another public company that is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company that has opted out of usingcash generated from sales to customers, will satisfy its working capital and capital requirements for at least the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

F-8

SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Going Concern Consideration

Through December 31, 2019, the Company’s liquidity needs have been satisfied through receipt of a $25,000 capital contribution from the Sponsor in exchange fornext twelve months following the issuance of the Founder Shares (Note 4)consolidated financial statements. The Company’s operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown and there can be no assurance that the current operating plan will be achieved at the levels or in the time frame anticipated by the Company, and it may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned. If adequate funds are not available to the Sponsor, approximately $251,000 in loans fromCompany on a timely basis, it may be required to delay, limit, reduce, or terminate certain commercial efforts, or pursue merger or acquisition strategies, all of which could adversely affect the Sponsor (which were fully repaid on August 12, 2019), andholdings or the net proceeds from the consummation of the Private Placement not held in the Trust Account.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had approximately $399,000 in its operating bank account, approximately $2.3 million of gain on marketable securities, dividends and interest held in Trust Account available to fund a Business Combination (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses and net of taxes payable), and working capital of approximately $5,000 (including approximately $567,000 in tax obligations, which will be paid using investment income held in Trust Account). In addition, in order to finance transaction costs in connection with a Business Combination, the Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor, or certainrights of the Company’s officersstockholders.

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and directors may, but are not obligated to, loanassumptions about future events. These estimates and the Company funds as may be required (“Working Capital Loans”). Asunderlying assumptions affect the amounts of December 31, 2019, there were noassets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts outstanding under any Working Capital Loan.

In connection with our assessment of going concern considerations in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board’s Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-15, “Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” the Company may not have sufficient liquidity to meet its future obligation. Management has determined that the Company has access to fundsrevenue and expenses. Actual results and outcomes could differ significantly from the Sponsor that are sufficient to fundCompany’s estimates, judgments, and assumptions. Significant estimates include determining standalone selling price for performance obligations in contracts with customers, the working capital needsestimated expected benefit period for

68

deferred contract acquisition costs, allowances for expected credit losses, inventory reserves, the useful lives of long-lived assets, the determination of the incremental borrowing rate used for operating lease liabilities, valuation of acquired goodwill and intangible assets, the value of common stock and other assumptions used to measure stock-based compensation, and the valuation of deferred income tax assets and uncertain tax positions. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company until Business Combination or for a minimum of one yearadjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the date of issuance of theseeconomic environment will be reflected in the financial statements.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

statements in future periods. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could materially differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Concentration of Credit Risk

and Other Risks and Uncertainties

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are held in adomestic and foreign cash accounts across large, creditworthy financial institution, which, at times, may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit of $250,000. At December 31, 2019, theinstitutions. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents through deposits with federally insured commercial banks and at times cash balances may be in excess of federal insurance limits. Short-term investments consist of U.S. treasury bills that carry high-credit ratings and accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these accounts, and management believesbalances.
Accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security in support of accounts receivable. To reduce credit risk, management performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable is not exposedconsidered to significant risks on such accounts.

Marketable Securities Held in Trust Account

be limited due to the diversity of the Company’s customer base and geographic sales areas. As of January 31, 2023, one customer individually accounted for 10% or more of accounts receivable, net. As of January 31, 2022, there was no customer that accounted for 10% or more of accounts receivable, net. For the year ended January 31, 2023, there was one customer that represented 10% or more of total revenue. For the years ended January 31, 2022, and 2021 there were no customers that represented 10% or more of total revenue.

The Company’s revenue is concentrated in the infrastructure needed for charging EVs, an industry which is highly competitive and rapidly changing. Significant technological changes within the industry or customer requirements, or the emergence of competitive products with new capabilities or technologies, could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.
Segment Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an entity where discrete financial information is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company operates as one operating segment because its CODM, who is its Chief Executive Officer, reviews its financial information on a consolidated basis for purposes of making decisions regarding allocating resources and assessing performance. The Company has no segment managers who are held accountable by the CODM for operations, operating results, and planning for levels of components below the consolidated unit level.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents may be invested in money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates their fair value.
Restricted cash relates to cash deposits restricted under letters of credit issued in support of customer and contract manufacturer agreements.
The reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash to amounts presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows were as follows:
January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents$264,162 $315,235 $145,491 
Restricted cash30,400 400 400 
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$294,562 $315,635 $145,891 
69

Short-Term Investments
The Company's portfolio of marketable debt securities is comprised solely of U.S. government securities within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16)with maturities of the Investmentmore than three months, but less than one year. The Company Act, with a maturity of 185 days or less,classifies these as available-for-sale at purchase date and will reevaluate such designation at each period end date. The Company may sell these marketable debt securities prior to their stated maturities depending upon changing liquidity requirements.
These debt securities are classified as trading securities. Trading securities are presented oncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheetssheet and recorded at fair value, atwith unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and as a component of the endconsolidated statements of each reporting period. comprehensive loss.
Gains and losses resulting fromare recognized when realized. Gains and losses are determined using the changespecific identification method and are reported in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations.
An impairment loss may be recognized when the decline in fair value of thesethe debt securities is determined to be other-than-temporary. The Company evaluates its investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair value below the cost basis each quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the cost basis of the short-term investments may not be recoverable. The evaluation is based on a number of factors, including the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been below the cost basis, as well as adverse conditions related specifically to the security, such as any changes to the credit rating of the security and the intent to sell or whether the Company will more likely than not be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Credit-related impairment losses, not to exceed the amount that fair value is less than the amortized cost basis, are recognized through an allowance for credit losses with changes in the allowance for credit losses recorded in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations. Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the estimate of credit losses.
Accounts Receivable, net
Accounts receivable for products, services and in certain scenarios charging sessions are recorded at the invoiced amount and are non-interest bearing. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and maintains an allowance for expected credit losses related to its existing accounts receivable and net realizable value to ensure trade receivables are not overstated due to uncollectibility. Allowances are provided for individual accounts receivable when the Company becomes aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, such as in the case of bankruptcy, deterioration in the customer’s operating results, or change in financial position. If circumstances related to customers change, estimates of the recoverability of receivables are further adjusted. The Company also considers broader factors in evaluating the sufficiency of its allowances, including the length of time receivables are past due, macroeconomic conditions, significant one-time events, and historical experience. When the Company determines that there are accounts receivable that are uncollectible, they are written off against the allowance. The change in the allowance for expected credit losses for the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 was as follows:
Beginning
Balance
Additions
Charged To
Expense
Write-offsEnding
Balance
(in thousands)
Year ended January 31, 2023
Allowance for expected credit losses$5,584 $6,353 $(1,937)$10,000 
Year ended January 31, 2022
Allowance for expected credit losses$2,000 $3,835 $(251)$5,584 
Year ended January 31, 2021
Allowance for expected credit losses$2,000 $121 $(121)$2,000 
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory levels are analyzed periodically and written down to their net realizable value if they have become obsolete, have a cost basis in excess of expected net realizable value or are in excess of expected demand. The Company analyzes current and future product demand relative to the remaining product life to identify potential excess inventories. The write-down is measured as the difference between the cost of the inventories and net realizable value and charged to inventory reserves, which is a component of cost of revenue. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower cost basis for those inventories is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis.
70

Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, as follows:
Useful Lives
Furniture and fixtures3 to 5 years
Computers and software3 to 5 years
Machinery and equipment3 to 5 years
Tooling3 to 5 years
Leasehold improvementsShorter of the estimated lease term or useful life
Owned and operated systems5 to 7 years
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of estimated useful lives of the assets or the lease term. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Upon disposition, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.
ChargePoint-as-a-Service (“CPaaS”) combines the customer’s use of the Company’s owned and operated systems with Cloud subscription software (“Cloud”) and the Company’s Assure program (“Assure”) into a single subscription. When CPaaS contracts contain a lease, the underlying asset is carried at its carrying value within property and equipment, net on the consolidated balance sheets.
Internal-Use Software Development Costs
The Company capitalizes qualifying internal-use software development costs incurred during the application development stage for internal tools and cloud-based applications used to deliver its services, provided that management with the relevant authority authorizes and commits to the funding of the project, it is probable the project will be completed, and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post implementation activities are expensed as incurred. Capitalized internal-use software development costs are included in gainproperty and equipment and are amortized on marketable securities (net), dividendsa straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives once it is ready for its intended use. Amortization of capitalized internal-use software development costs is included within cost of revenue for Networked Charging Systems and interest,subscriptions, research and development expense, sales and marketing expense, and general and administrative expense based on the use of the software. Costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional material functionality are capitalized. As of January 31, 2023 and 2022 capitalized costs have not been material.
Leases
Lessee
The Company determines if a contract is a lease or contains a lease at the inception of the contract and reassesses that conclusion if the contract is modified. All leases are assessed for classification as an operating lease or a finance lease. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets are presented separately on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Operating lease liabilities are separated into a current portion, included within accrued and other current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, and a noncurrent portion included within operating lease liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company does not have material finance leases. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. The Company does not obtain and control its right to use the asset until the lease commencement date.
The Company’s lease liabilities are recognized at the applicable lease commencement date based on the present value of the lease payments required to be paid over the lease term. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate to discount the lease payments to present value. The estimated incremental borrowing rate is derived from information available at the lease commencement date. The Company’s ROU assets are also recognized at the applicable lease commencement date. The ROU asset equals the carrying amount of the related lease liability, adjusted for any lease payments made prior to lease commencement and lease incentives provided by the lessor. Variable lease payments are expensed as incurred and do not factor into the measurement of the applicable ROU asset or lease liability.
The term of the Company’s leases equals the non-cancellable period of the lease, including any rent-free periods provided by the lessor, and also includes options to renew or extend the lease (including by not terminating the lease) that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. The Company establishes the term of each lease at lease commencement and reassesses that term in subsequent periods when one of the triggering events outlined in ASC 842 occurs. Operating lease cost for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
71

The Company’s lease contracts often include lease and non-lease components. The Company has elected the practical expedient offered by the standard to not separate the lease from non-lease components and accounts for them as a single lease component.
The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which allows the Company to carry forward its historical lease classification, its assessment on whether a contract is or contains a lease, and its initial direct costs for any leases that existed prior to adoption of the new standard. The Company has elected, for all classes of underlying assets, not to recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities for leases with a term of twelve months or less. Lease cost for short-term leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Lessor
The Company leases Networked Charging Systems to customers within certain CPaaS contracts. The leasing arrangements the Company enters into with lessees are operating leases, and as a result, the underlying asset is carried at its carrying value as owned and operated systems within property and equipment, net on the consolidated balance sheets.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets or asset groups for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable based on expected future cash flows attributable to that asset or asset group. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amounts of an asset or an asset group to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows which the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If the carrying amount of an asset or asset group exceeds estimated undiscounted future cash flows, then an impairment charge would be recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset or asset group over its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. There were no impairments of long-lived assets for the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.
Business Combinations
The total purchase consideration for an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets transferred, equity instruments issued, and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. Costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition are expensed as incurred and included in Trust Accountgeneral and administrative expense in the accompanying statementCompany’s consolidated statements of operations. The estimatedIdentifiable assets (including intangible assets), liabilities assumed (including contingent liabilities), and noncontrolling interests in an acquisition are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date. The Company recognizes goodwill if the fair value of marketable securities heldthe total purchase consideration and any noncontrolling interests is in Trust Account are determined using available market information.

Useexcess of Estimates

The preparationthe net fair value of these financial statements in conformity with GAAPthe identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires the Company’s management to makeuse significant judgment and estimates including the selection of valuation methodologies, cost of capital, future cash flows, and discount rates. The Company’s estimates of fair value are based on assumptions that affectbelieved to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. During the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atmeasurement period, not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, the balance sheetCompany may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with a corresponding offset to goodwill. The Company includes the reported amountsresults of revenueoperations of the acquired business in the consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date.

Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the fair value of the net tangible and expenses duringidentifiable intangible assets acquired. The carrying amount of goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually, in the fourth quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As of January 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had a single operating segment and reporting unit structure. As part of the annual goodwill impairment test performed in the fourth quarter, the Company first performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. If, as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting period. Itunit is at least reasonably possible thatless than its carrying amount, the estimatequantitative impairment test will be required. If the Company has determined it necessary to perform a quantitative impairment assessment, the Company will compare the fair value of the effectreporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, limited to the total amount of a condition, situation or setgoodwill of circumstances that existedthe reporting unit. The carrying value of goodwill was $213.7 million as of January 31, 2023 and $218.5 million as of January 31, 2022, and no goodwill impairment has been recognized to date.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist primarily of customer relationships and developed technology. Acquired intangible assets are initially recorded at the dateacquisition-date fair value and amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives ranging from six to ten years.
72

Fair value is defined as thean exchange price that would be received for sale ofto sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for transfer of athe asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participantsparticipants. Assets and liabilities measured at the measurement date. GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizesare classified into the following categories based on the inputs used in measuringto measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quotedvalue:
(Level 1) — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements)that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date;
(Level 2) — Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and
(Level 3) — Inputs that are unobservable for the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). These tiers include:

Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identicalasset or liability.
The Company classifies financial instruments in active markets;
Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
Level 3 defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions, such as valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.

In some circumstances, the inputs used to measure fair value might be categorized within different levels of the fair value hierarchy.hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In those instances,addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable, either directly or indirectly. The Company’s assessment of a particular input to the fair value measurement is categorizedrequires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available in its entirety indetermining fair value. The Company recognizes transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy, if any, at the end of each period. There were no transfers between levels during the periods presented. The Company had no material non-financial assets valued on a non-recurring basis that resulted in an impairment in any period presented.

The carrying values of the Company’s cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net, accounts payable, and accrued and other current liabilities approximate fair value based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

As of December 31, 2019, the carrying values of cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and tax payable approximate their fair values due to thehighly liquid, short-term nature of these instruments.

Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants
As discussed in Note 12, Stock Warrants and Earnout, upon the instruments.effectiveness of the Merger, substantially all of the outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants were converted into shares of Common Stock. As such, the associated warrant liability was reclassified to additional paid-in-capital upon the Merger and was no longer an outstanding Level 3 financial instrument as of January 31, 2023 and 2022.
Prior to the Merger, the Company evaluated whether its warrants to purchase shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock were freestanding financial instruments that obligated the Company to redeem the underlying preferred stock at some point in the future and determined that each of its outstanding warrants for preferred stock were liability classified. Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants were recorded within noncurrent liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s portfolio of marketable securities held in Trust Account is comprised of investments in U.S. Treasury securities with an original maturity of 185 days or less. Thewarrants were recorded at fair value for trading securities is determined using quoted market pricesupon issuance and were subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date. Changes in active markets.

Offering Costs Associatedfair value of the redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

Common Stock Warrant Liabilities
The Company assumed 10,470,562 publicly-traded warrants (“Public Warrants”) and 6,521,568 private placement warrants issued to NGP Switchback, LLC, the sponsor of Switchback (“Private Placement Warrants” and, together with the Initial Public Offering

Offering costs consist of legal, accounting, underwriting fees and other costs that were directly related toWarrants, the Initial Public Offering were charged to stockholders’ equity“Common Stock Warrants”) upon the completionMerger, all of which were issued in connection with Switchback’s initial public offering and subsequent overallotment (other than 1,000,000 Private Placement Warrants which were issued in connection with the closing of the Initial Public Offering in JulyMerger) and September 2019.

Class Aentitle the holder to purchase one share of the Company’s Common Stock, Subjectpar value $0.0001 (“Common Stock”), at an exercise price of $11.50 per share. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023, the remaining 10,435 Private Placement Warrants were exercised. As of January 31, 2023, no Common Stock Warrants remain outstanding.

The Company evaluated the Common Stock Warrants and concluded that they do not meet the criteria to Possible Redemption

Class A common stock subject to mandatory redemption (if any) arebe classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable Class A common stock (including Class A common stock that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) are classified as temporary equity. At all other times, Class A common stock are classified as stockholders’ equity. The agreement governing the Common Stock Warrants includes a provision (“Replacement of Securities Upon Reorganization”), the application of which could result in a different settlement value for the Common Stock Warrants depending on their holder. Because the holder of an instrument is not an input into the pricing of a fixed-for-fixed option on the Company’s Class A common stock feature certain redemption rights thatordinary shares, the Private Placement Warrants are not considered to be “indexed to the Company’s own stock.” In addition, the provision provides that in the event of a tender or exchange offer accepted by holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s ordinary shares, all holders of the Common Stock Warrants (both the Public Warrants and the Private Placement Warrants) would be entitled to receive cash for all of their Common Stock Warrants. Specifically, in the event of a qualifying cash tender offer (which could be outside of the Company’s control and subjectcontrol), all Common Stock Warrant holders would be entitled to the occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, at December 31, 2019, 30,047,981 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption are presented as temporary equity, outsidecash, while only certain of the stockholders’ equity sectionholders of the Company’s balance sheet.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share ofordinary shares may be entitled to cash. These provisions preclude the Company from classifying the Common Stock

Net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income by Warrants in stockholders’ equity. As the weighted-average numberCommon Stock Warrants meet the definition of common stock outstanding duringa derivative, the periods. The Company has not consideredrecorded these warrants as liabilities on the effect of the warrants soldconsolidated balance sheets at fair value, with subsequent changes in their respective fair values recognized in the Initial Public Offering (includingconsolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss at each reporting date.

73

Contingent Earnout Liability
In connection with the consummation ofReverse Recapitalization and pursuant to the over-allotment) and Private PlacementMerger Agreement, eligible ChargePoint equity holders were entitled to purchase an aggregate of 15,992,155receive as additional merger consideration shares of the Company’s Class A common stockCommon Stock upon the Company achieving certain Earnout Triggering Events (as described in Note 12, Stock Warrants and Earnout). In accordance with ASC 815-40, the Earnout Shares were not indexed to the Common Stock and therefore were accounted for as a liability at the Reverse Recapitalization date and subsequently remeasured at each reporting date with changes in fair value recorded as a component of other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations.
The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation using a distribution of potential outcomes on a monthly basis over the Earnout Period (as defined in Note 12, Stock Warrants and Earnout) prioritizing the most reliable information available. The assumptions utilized in the calculation were based on the achievement of diluted income per share, sincecertain stock price milestones, including the current Company Common Stock price, expected volatility, risk-free rate, expected term and dividend rate.
Prior to its settlement, the contingent earnout liability was categorized as a Level 3 fair value measurement (see Fair Value of Financial Instruments accounting policy as described above) because the Company estimated projections during the Earnout Period utilizing unobservable inputs. Contingent earnout payments involve certain assumptions requiring significant judgment and actual results can differ from assumed and estimated amounts.
Revenue Recognition
ChargePoint accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). The Company recognizes revenue using the following five-step model as prescribed by ASC 606:
Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer;
Identification of the performance obligations in the contract;
Determination of the transaction price;
Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
Recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation.
Significant judgment and estimates are necessary for the allocation of the proceeds received from an arrangement to the multiple performance obligations and the appropriate timing of revenue recognition. The Company enters into contracts with customers that regularly include promises to transfer multiple products and services, such as Networked Charging Systems, software subscriptions, extended maintenance, and professional services. For arrangements with multiple products or services, the Company evaluates whether the individual products or services qualify as distinct performance obligations. In its assessment of whether products or services are a distinct performance obligation, the Company determines whether the customer can benefit from the product or service on its own or with other readily available resources and whether the service is separately identifiable from other products or services in the contract. This evaluation requires the Company to assess the nature of each of its Networked Charging Systems, subscriptions, and other offerings and how each is provided in the context of the contract, including whether they are significantly integrated which may require judgment based on the facts and circumstances of the contract.
The transaction price for each contract is determined based on the amount the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for transferring the promised products or services to the customer. Collectability of revenue is reasonably assured based on historical evidence of collectability of fees the Company charges its customers. The transaction price in the contract is allocated to each distinct performance obligation in an amount that represents the relative amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for satisfying each performance obligation. Revenue is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied. Revenue is recorded based on the transaction price excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties such as sales taxes, which are collected on behalf of and remitted to governmental authorities, or driver fees, collected on behalf of customers who offer public charging for a fee.
When agreements involve multiple distinct performance obligations, the Company accounts for individual performance obligations separately if they are distinct. The Company applies significant judgment in identifying and accounting for each performance obligation, as a result of evaluating terms and conditions in contracts. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price (“SSP”) basis. The Company determines SSP based on observable standalone selling price when it is available, as well as other factors, including the price charged to its customers, its discounting practices, and its overall pricing objectives, while maximizing observable inputs. In situations where pricing is highly variable, or a product is never sold on a stand-alone basis, the Company estimates the SSP using the residual approach.
The Company usually bills its customers at the onset of the arrangement for both the products and a predetermined period of time for services. Contracts for services typically range from annual to multi-year agreements with typical payment terms of 30 to 90 days.
74

Networked Charging Systems revenue
Networked Charging Systems revenue includes revenue related to the deliveries of EV charging system infrastructure. The Company recognizes revenue from sales of Networked Charging Systems upon shipment to the customer, which is when the performance obligation has been satisfied.
Subscriptions revenue
Subscriptions revenue consists of services related to Cloud, as well as extended maintenance service plans under Assure. Subscriptions revenue is recognized over time on a straight-line basis as the Company has a stand-ready obligation to deliver such services to the customer.
Subscriptions revenue also consists of CPaaS revenue, which combines the customer’s use of the Company’s owned and operated systems with Cloud and Assure programs into a single subscription. CPaaS subscriptions are considered for accounting purposes to contain a lease for the customer’s use of the Company’s owned and operated systems unless the location allows the Company to receive incremental economic benefit from regulatory credits earned on that owned and operated system. The leasing arrangements the Company enters into with lessees are operating leases. The Company recognizes operating lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term and expenses deferred initial direct costs on the same basis. Lessor revenue relates to operating leases and historically has not been material.
Other revenue
Other revenue consists of fees received for transferring regulatory credits earned for participating in low carbon fuel programs in jurisdictions with such programs, charging related fees received from drivers using charging sites owned and operated by the Company, net transaction fees earned for processing payments collected on driver charging sessions at charging sites owned by ChargePoint customers, and other professional services. Revenue from regulatory credits is recognized at the point in time the regulatory credits are transferred. Revenue from fees for owned and operated sites is recognized over time on a straight-line basis over the performance period of the service contract as the Company has a stand-ready obligation to deliver such services. Revenue from driver charging sessions and charging transaction fees is recognized at the point in time the charging session or transaction is completed. Revenue from professional services is recognized as the services are rendered.
Remaining Performance Obligations
Remaining performance obligations represent the amount of contracted future revenue not yet recognized as the amounts relate to undelivered performance obligations, including both deferred revenue and non-cancelable contracted amounts that will be invoiced and recognized as revenue in future periods. The Company’s Assure, Cloud, and CPaaS subscription terms typically range from one to five years and are paid upfront. Revenue expected to be recognized from remaining performance obligations was $222.4 million as of January 31, 2023, of which 43% is expected to be recognized over the next twelve months and the remainder thereafter.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents billings or payments received in advance of revenue recognition and is recognized in revenue upon transfer of control. Balances consist primarily of software subscription services and extended Assure maintenance services not yet provided as of the balance sheet date. Contract assets, which represent services provided or products transferred to customers in advance of the date the Company has a right to invoice, are netted against deferred revenue on a customer-by-customer basis. Deferred revenue that will be recognized during the succeeding twelve-month period is recorded as deferred revenue with the remainder recorded as deferred revenue, noncurrent on the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table shows the total deferred revenue for each period presented.
January 31, 2023January 31, 2022
(in thousands)
Total deferred revenue$198,610 $146,808 
The following table shows the revenue recognized that was included in the deferred revenue balance at the beginning of the period.
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Total deferred revenue recognized$77,142 $40,934 $39,400 
75

Cost of Revenue
Cost of Networked Charging Systems revenue includes the material costs for parts and manufacturing costs for the hardware products, compensation, including salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, warranty provisions, depreciation of manufacturing related equipment and facilities, and allocated overhead costs. Costs for shipping and handling are recorded in cost of revenue as incurred.
Cost of subscriptions revenue includes hosting, network and wireless connectivity costs for subscription services, field maintenance costs for Assure to support the Company’s network of systems, depreciation of owned and operated systems used in CPaaS arrangements, allocated overhead costs, and support costs to manage the systems and helpdesk services for site hosts.
Cost of other revenue includes depreciation and other costs for ChargePoint’s owned and operated charging sites, charging related processing charges, salaries and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, as well as costs of environmental and professional services.
Costs to Obtain a Customer Contract
Incremental and recoverable costs for the sale of cloud enabled software and extended maintenance service plans are capitalized as deferred contract acquisition costs within prepaid expenses and other current assets and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and amortized on a straight-line basis over the anticipated benefit period of five years. The benefit period was estimated by taking into consideration the length of customer contracts, renewals, technology lifecycle, and other factors. This amortization is recorded within sales and marketing expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The sales commissions paid related to the sale of Networked Charging Systems are expensed as incurred.
The Company elected the practical expedient that permits the Company to apply ASC Subtopic 340-40, “Other Assets and Deferred Costs--Contracts with Customers,” (“ASC 340”) to a portfolio containing multiple contracts, as they are similar in their inclusioncharacteristics, and the financial statement effects of applying ASC Subtopic 340-40 to that portfolio would be anti-dilutivenot differ materially from applying it to the individual contracts within that portfolio.
Changes in the deferred contract acquisition costs during the years ended January 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 31, 2021$5,534
Capitalization of deferred contract acquisition costs3,381 
Amortization of deferred contract acquisition costs(1,786)
Balance as of January 31, 2022$7,129
Capitalization of deferred contract acquisition costs3,374 
Amortization of deferred contract acquisition costs(2,361)
Balance as of January 31, 2023$8,142
Deferred acquisition costs capitalized on the consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
January 31
20232022
(in thousands)
Deferred contract acquisition costs, current$2,598 $2,104 
Deferred contract acquisition costs, noncurrent5,544 5,025 
Total deferred contract acquisition costs$8,142 $7,129 
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salary and related personnel expenses, including stock-based compensation, for personnel related to the development of improvements and expanded features for the Company’s products and services, as well as quality assurance, testing, product management, and allocated overhead. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company measures stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based awards granted to employees and directors based on the estimated fair value of the awards on the date of grant and recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the requisite
76

service period. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options and rights granted under the treasuryemployee stock method.

purchase plan (“ESPP”) using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and the Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the fair value of performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”). The fair value of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) equals the fair market value of the Company’s statementCommon Stock on grant date.

The Company amortizes the fair value of operations includeseach stock award, except for market-based PRSU, on a presentationstraight-line basis over the requisite service period of income per sharethe awards. For market-based PRSU, the Company amortizes using a graded-vesting attribution approach. Stock-based compensation expense is based on the value of the portion of stock-based awards that is ultimately expected to vest. As such, the Company’s stock-based compensation is reduced for common stock subjectthe estimated forfeitures at the date of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Advertising
The Company expenses the costs of advertising, including promotional expenses, as incurred. Advertising expenses for the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 were not material.
Warranty
The Company provides standard warranty coverage on its products, providing parts necessary to redemption inrepair the systems during the warranty period. The Company accounts for the estimated warranty cost as a manner similarcharge to Networked Charging Systems cost of revenue when revenue is recognized. The estimated warranty cost is based on historical and predicted product failure rates and repair expenses. Warranty expense for the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 was $5.4 million, $3.8 million, and $3.4 million, respectively.
In addition, the Company offers paid-for subscriptions to extended maintenance service plans under Assure. Assure provides both the labor and parts to maintain the products over the subscription terms of typically one to five years. The costs related to the two-class methodAssure program are expensed as incurred and charged to subscriptions cost of revenue.
Foreign Currency
The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is generally the local currency. The translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars is performed for monetary assets and liabilities at the end of each reporting period based on the then current exchange rates. Non-monetary items are translated using historical exchange rates. For revenue and expense accounts, an average foreign currency rate during the period is applied. Adjustments resulting from translating foreign functional currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are recorded as part of a separate component of stockholders’ equity (deficit) and reported in the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in other income per share. Net income per share, basic and diluted for Class A common stock is calculated by dividing the gain on marketable securities, dividends and interest held in Trust Account of approximately $2.3 million,(expense), net of applicable taxes and funds available to be withdrawn from Trust for tax obligations of approximately $567,000, resulted to an aggregate of approximately $1.7 million, by the weighted average number of Class A common stock outstanding for the period of 31,092,978 shares. Net loss per share, basic and diluted for Class B common stock is calculated by dividing the net income of approximately $780,000, less income attributable to Public Shares of approximately $1.7 million, resulted to a net loss of approximately $935,000, by the weighted average number of Class B common stock outstanding for the period of 7,852,941 shares.

F-10

period.

SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Income Taxes

The Company followsuses the asset and liability method ofin accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statementsstatement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect onDeferred tax expense or benefit is the result of changes in the deferred tax assetsasset and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date.liability. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets where it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating the Company’s ability to recover deferred tax assets, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including historical operating results, ongoing tax planning, and forecasts of future taxable income on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. Based on the level of historical losses, the Company has established a valuation allowance to reduce its net deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

For tax benefits to be recognized, a tax position must bethat is more likely than not to be realized.

A tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. There were no unrecognized tax benefits asauthorities, including resolutions of December 31, 2019.any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position.
Net Loss per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is presented in conformity with the two-class method required for participating securities. The Company recognizes accrued interestconsiders all series of its redeemable convertible preferred stock to be participating securities. The Company also considers any shares issued on the early exercise of stock options subject to repurchase to be participating securities because holders of such shares have nonforfeitable dividend rights in the event a dividend is paid on common stock. Under the two-class method, net income is attributed to common stockholders and penalties relatedparticipating securities based on their participation rights. The holders of the redeemable convertible preferred stock, as well as the holders of early exercised shares subject to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. No amounts were accruedrepurchase, do not have a contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company. As such, the Company’s net losses for the paymentyears ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 were not allocated to these participating securities.
77


Under the two-class method, basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of December 31, 2019. The Company is currently not awareshares of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position. The Company iscommon stock outstanding during the period, less shares subject to income tax examinationsrepurchase. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders adjusts basic net loss per share for the effect of dilutive securities, including stock options.
Net loss amount is computed by major taxing authorities since inception.

Recent adding deemed dividends and cumulative dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock, to net loss. As such, the amount of the loss is increased by those instruments. When computing dilutive net loss, the numerator is also adjusted by changes in fair value attributable to dilutive warrants and gains attributable to Earnout Shares issued. As a result, some of the liability classified Company’s common stock warrants and Earnout Shares issued were dilutive, even though the Company reported losses for all periods presented.

Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In July 2017,August 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480);2020-06, “Debt — Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) AccountingHedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40),” which modifies and simplifies accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception.convertible instruments. The ASU allows companies to exclude a down round feature when determining whether a financial instrument (or embedded conversion feature) is considered indexed to the entity’s own stock. As a result, financial instruments (or embedded conversion features) with down round features may no longer be required to be classified as liabilities. A company will recognize the value of a down round feature only when it is triggered and the strike price has been adjusted downward. For equity-classified freestanding financial instruments, such as warrants, an entity will treat the value of the effect of the down round, when triggered, as a dividend and a reduction of income available to common shareholders in computing basic earnings per share. For convertible instruments withnew guidance eliminates certain separation models that require separating embedded conversion features containing down round provisions, entities will recognize the value of the down round as a beneficial conversion discount to be amortized to earnings.from convertible instruments. The guidance also addresses how convertible instruments are accounted for in ASU 2017-11 isthe diluted earnings per share calculation. The guidance became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years.2021. The Company adopted this guidance at inception. As a result, the warrants to be issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering and the saleamendments effective February 1, 2022. The adoption of the Private Placement Warrants to the Sponsor will be equity-classified.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASU 2019-12”), which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its financial statements and related disclosures.

Management does2020-06 did not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE

In November 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-10, “Government Assistance (Topic 832): Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance,” which requires entities to disclose annually its transactions with a government accounted for by applying a grant or contribution accounting model by analogy. The disclosure requirement includes information about the nature of the transactions and the related accounting policy used to account for the transactions, the line items on the consolidated balance sheets and income statement that are affected by the transactions, and the amounts applicable to each financial statement line, and significant terms and conditions of the transactions, including commitments and contingencies. The guidance became effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021. Early application is permitted. The Company adopted the amendments effective February 1, 2022. The adoption of ASU 2021-10 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
3.    INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING

On July 30, 2019,Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
Fair Value Measured as of January 31, 2023
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
( in thousands)
Assets
Money market funds$133,979 $— $— $133,979 
U.S. Treasury securities— 104,966 — 104,966 
Total financial assets$133,979 $104,966 $ $238,945 
Fair Value Measured as of January 31, 2022
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
( in thousands)
Assets
Money market funds$254,716 $— $— $254,716 
Total financial assets$254,716 $ $ $254,716 
Liabilities
Common stock warrant liabilities (Private Placement)$— $ $25 $25 
Contingent earnout liability recognized upon acquisition of ViriCiti (ViriCiti Earnout)—  5,993 5,993 
Total financial liabilities$ $ $6,018 $6,018 
The money market funds were classified as cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated balance sheets and were within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The aggregate fair value of the Company’s money market funds approximated amortized cost and, as such,
78

there were no unrealized gains or losses on money market funds as of January 31, 2023 and 2022. Realized gains and losses, net of tax, were not material for any of the periods presented.
Short-term investments, consisting of U.S. Treasury securities, were classified as available-for-sale on the purchase date and recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets (see Note 4, Short-Term Investments, for more details).
As of January 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company sold 30,000,000 Unitshad no investments with a contractual maturity of greater than one year.
The following table presents a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments:

Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liabilityPrivate placement warrant liabilityEarnout liabilityViriCiti Earnout liability
(in thousands)
Fair value as of January 31, 2020$(2,718)$ $ $ 
Change in fair value included in other income (expense), net(73,125)— — — 
Fair value as of January 31, 2021$(75,843)$ $ $ 
Private placement warrant liability acquired as part of the Merger— (127,888)— — 
Contingent earnout liability recognized upon the closing of the reverse recapitalization— — (828,180)— 
Contingent earnout liability recognized upon the acquisition of ViriCiti (“ViriCiti Earnout”)— — — (3,856)
Change in fair value9,237 63,746 84,420 (2,137)
Reclassification of warrants to stockholders’ equity (deficit) due to exercise— 64,117 — — 
Reclassification of Legacy ChargePoint preferred stock warrant liability upon the reverse capitalization66,606 — — — 
Issuance of earnout shares upon triggering events— — 501,120 — 
Reclassification of remaining contingent earnout liability upon triggering event— — 242,640 — 
Fair value as of January 31, 2022$ $(25)$ $(5,993)
Change in fair value included in other income (expense), net (23)  
Effect of foreign currency translation— — — 191 
Reclassification of warrants to stockholder’s equity (deficit) due to exercise— 48 — — 
Contingent earnout liability increase upon satisfaction of earnings goal of ViriCiti (ViriCiti Earnout)   (1,283)
Transfer out of Level 3 upon achievement of earnings target for the earnout period— — — 7,085 
Fair Value as of January 31, 2023$ $ $ $ 
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Warrant Liability, Private Placement Warrant Liability, and Earnout Liability
The fair values of the private placement warrant liability, redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability and earnout liability are based on significant unobservable inputs, which represent Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements of the private placement warrant liability, the redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability and the earnout liability include the expected volatility and dividend yield. In determining the fair value of the private placement warrant liability, the Company used the Binomial Lattice Model (“BLM”) that assumes optimal exercise of the Company's redemption option at the earliest possible date. In determining the fair value of the redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability, the Company used the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model (“Black-Scholes”) to estimate the fair value using unobservable inputs including the expected term, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. In determining the fair value of the earnout liability, the Company used the Monte Carlo simulation valuation model using a distribution of potential outcomes on a monthly basis over the Earnout Period using the most reliable information available.
ViriCiti Earnout Liability
On August 11, 2021, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of ViriCiti Group B.V. (“ViriCiti”). The purchase price consideration included an earnout consideration contingent on meeting certain revenue targets through January 21, 2023. The fair value
79

of the ViriCiti Earnout liability was previously based on significant unobservable inputs, which represented Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. See Note 5, Reverse Capitalization and Business Combinations,for information on the valuation of the ViriCiti Earnout liability.
On January 31, 2023, the ViriCiti Earnout liability of $7.1 million, for the earnout period is based on the actual achievement of the revenue target and was subsequently paid in full on March 6, 2023 (see Note 18, Subsequent Events). Thus, the liability is no longer subject to fair value measurement and was accordingly transferred out of Level 3 fair value hierarchy, and is included in the “Accrued and other current liabilities” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The Company has certain assets, including goodwill and other intangible assets, which are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are adjusted to fair value only if an impairment charge is recognized. The categorization of the framework used to measure fair value of the assets is considered to be within the Level 3 valuation hierarchy due to the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used.
Disclosure of Fair Values
The Company has financial instruments that are not re-measured at fair value including accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued and other current liabilities. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
4.    Short-Term Investments
Short-term investments consisted of the following:
January 31, 2023
Amortized CostGross Unrealized GainsGross Unrealized LossesFair Value
(in thousands)
U.S. Treasury Securities$105,415 $— $(449)$104,966 
The amortized cost and fair value amounts include accrued interest receivable of $0.5 million as of January 31, 2023. There were no short-term investments as of January 31, 2022 and 2021.
The U.S. treasury securities are marketable debt securities stated on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value based upon inputs other than quoted prices in active markets (Level 2 inputs). The Company recorded $0.4 million unrealized losses as a component of other comprehensive loss for the year ended January 31, 2023. The Company did not recognize any gains or losses for the year ended January 31, 2023.
As of January 31, 2023, all of the available-for-sale debt securities were in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months. During the year ended January 31, 2023, the Company did not recognize credit-related impairment losses and had no ending allowance for credit losses. The decline in fair value below amortized cost basis was not considered other than temporary as it is more likely than not the Company will hold the debt securities until maturity or a recovery of the cost basis.
As of January 31, 2023, all of the marketable debt securities have contractual maturities of less than one year.
5.    Reverse Capitalization and Business Combinations
Reverse Recapitalization
On February 26, 2021, Lightning Merger Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Switchback, merged with Legacy ChargePoint, with Legacy ChargePoint surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Switchback. As a result of the Merger, Switchback was renamed ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. Immediately prior to the closing of the Merger:
all 22,427,306 shares of Legacy ChargePoint’s outstanding Series H-1 redeemable convertible preferred stock were converted into an equivalent number of shares of Legacy ChargePoint common stock on a one-to-one basis and an additional 1,026,084 shares of Common Stock were issued to settle the accumulated dividend to the Series H-1 redeemable convertible preferred stockholders of $21.1 million;
80

all 160,925,957 shares of Legacy ChargePoint’s outstanding Series H, Series G, Series F, Series E, and Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock were converted into an equivalent number of shares of Legacy ChargePoint common stock on a one-to-one basis;
all 45,376 shares of Legacy ChargePoint’s outstanding Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock were converted into an equivalent number of shares of Legacy ChargePoint common stock on a 1:73.4403 basis;
all 130,590 shares of Legacy ChargePoint’s outstanding Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock were converted into an equivalent number of shares of Legacy ChargePoint common stock on a 1:42.9220 basis; and
all 29,126 shares of Legacy ChargePoint’s outstanding Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock were converted into an equivalent number of shares of Legacy ChargePoint common stock on a 1:48.2529 basis.
At the Merger, eligible ChargePoint equity holders received or had the right to receive shares of Common Stock at a deemed value of $10.00 per share after giving effect to the exchange ratio of 0.9966 as defined in the Merger Agreement (“Exchange Ratio”). Accordingly, immediately following the consummation of the Merger, Legacy ChargePoint common stock exchanged into 217,021,368 shares of Common Stock, 68,896,516 shares were reserved for the issuance of Common Stock upon the potential future exercise of Legacy ChargePoint stock options and warrants that were exchanged into ChargePoint stock options and warrants, and 27,000,000 shares of Common Stock were reserved for the potential future issuance of the Earnout Shares.
In connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Switchback entered into separate subscription agreements (each a “Subscription Agreement”) with a number of investors (each a “New PIPE Investor”), pursuant to which the New PIPE Investors agreed to purchase, and Switchback agreed to sell to the New PIPE Investors, an aggregate of 22,500,000 shares of Common Stock (“PIPE Shares”), for a purchase price of $10.00 per Unit in the Initial Public Offering. Each Unit consists of one share of Class A common stock and one-third of one redeemable warrant (each, a “Public Warrant”). Each Public Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of Class A common stock at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment (see Note 6). Certain officers and directors of the Company purchased 200,000 (the “Affiliated Units”) of the 30,000,000 Units sold in the Initial Public Offering for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million.


SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

$225.0 million, in a private placement pursuant to the subscription agreements (“PIPE Financing”). The Company grantedPIPE Financing closed simultaneously with the underwriters a 45-day option from the dateconsummation of the final prospectus relatingMerger.

Pursuant to the Initial Public Offering to purchase up to 4,500,000 additional Units to cover over-allotments, if any, atterms of a letter agreement the Initial Public Offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. On September 4, 2019,initial Switchback stockholders entered into in connection with the underwriters partially exercised the over-allotment option and, on September 6, 2019, the underwriters purchased the Over-allotment Units, generating gross proceeds of approximately $14.1 million. The remaining over-allotment option subsequently expired.

NOTE 4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Founder Shares

On May 16, 2019, the Sponsor purchased 8,625,000 shares (the “Founder Shares”)execution of the Company’sMerger Agreement (“Founders Stock Letter”), the initial stockholders surrendered 984,706 of Switchback Class B common stock par value $0.0001shares purchased by NGP Switchback, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Sponsor”) prior to the Switchback Public Offering on May 16, 2019 (“Founder Shares”) for no consideration, whereupon such Founder Shares were immediately cancelled. Additionally, 900,000 Founder Shares, which were previously subjected to potential forfeiture until the closing volume weighted average price per share for an aggregate price of $25,000. The Initial Stockholders agreed to forfeit up to 1,125,000 Founder Shares to the extent that the over-allotment option was not exercised in full by the underwriters. The forfeiture was adjusted to the extent that the over-allotment option was not exercised in full by the underwriters so that the Founder Shares would represent 20.0% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares after the Initial Public Offering. On September 6, 2019, the underwriters partially purchased the Over-allotment Units, and the remaining over-allotment option subsequently expired. As a result, an aggregate of 772,059 Founder Shares were forfeited accordingly.

The Initial Stockholders agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of the Founder Shares until one year after the date of the consummation of the initial Business Combination or earlier if, subsequent to the initial Business Combination, (i) the last sale price of the Company’s Class A common stock equals or exceedsCommon Stock achieved $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20ten trading days within any 30-tradingtwenty consecutive trading day period commencing at least 150 days afterduring the initial Business Combination or (ii)five-year period following the Company consummatesClosing (“Founder Earn Back Triggering Event” and such Founder Shares the “Founder Earn Back Shares”), met the Founder Earn Back Triggering Event on March 12, 2021.

At the Closing, the Sponsor exercised its right to convert a subsequent liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction which results in allportion of the Company’s stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.

Private Placement Warrants

Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering,working capital loans made by the Sponsor purchasedto Switchback into an aggregate of 5,333,333additional 1,000,000 Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant, generating gross proceedswarrant in satisfaction of approximately $8.0$1.5 million inprincipal amount of such loans.

The number of shares of Common Stock issued immediately following the aggregate. Simultaneously withconsummation of the Merger was as follows:
Shares
Common stock of Switchback, outstanding prior to Merger39,264,704 
Less redemption of Switchback shares(33,009)
Less surrender of Switchback Founder Shares(984,706)
Common stock of Switchback38,246,989 
Shares issued in PIPE22,500,000 
Merger and PIPE financing shares (1)60,746,989 
Legacy ChargePoint shares (2)217,021,368 
Total shares of common stock immediately after Merger277,768,357 
_______________
(1) This includes 900,000 contingently forfeitable Founder Earn Back Shares pending the occurrence of the Founder Earn Back Triggering Event, which was met on March 12, 2021
(2) The number of Legacy ChargePoint shares was determined by converting the 217,761,738 shares of Legacy ChargePoint common stock outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the saleMerger using the Exchange Ratio of 0.9966. All fractional shares were rounded down.
81

The Merger is accounted for as a reverse recapitalization under U.S. GAAP. This determination is primarily based on Legacy ChargePoint stockholders comprising a relative majority of the Over-allotment Units,voting power of ChargePoint and having the Sponsor purchasedability to nominate the members of the Board of Directors, Legacy ChargePoint’s operations prior to the acquisition comprising the only ongoing operations of ChargePoint, and Legacy ChargePoint’s senior management comprising a majority of the senior management of ChargePoint. Under this method of accounting, Switchback is treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the financial statements of ChargePoint represent a continuation of the financial statements of Legacy ChargePoint with the Merger being treated as the equivalent of ChargePoint issuing stock for the net assets of Switchback, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of Switchback are stated at historical costs, with no goodwill or other intangible assets recorded. Operations prior to the Merger are presented as those of ChargePoint. All periods prior to the Merger have been retrospectively adjusted using the Exchange Ratio for the equivalent number of shares outstanding immediately after the Merger to effect the reverse recapitalization. Additionally, upon the consummation of the Merger, the Company gave effect to the issuance of 60,746,989 shares of Common Stock for the previously issued Switchback common stock and PIPE Shares that were outstanding at the Closing Date.
In connection with the Merger, the Company raised $511.6 million of proceeds including the contribution of $286.6 million of cash held in Switchback’s trust account from its initial public offering, net of redemptions of Switchback public stockholders of $0.3 million, and $225.0 million of cash in connection with the PIPE financing. The Company incurred $36.5 million of transaction costs, consisting of banking, legal, and other professional fees, of which $29.5 million was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital of proceeds and the remaining $7.0 million was expensed in the consolidated statements of operations.
Acquisition of ViriCiti
On August 11, 2021, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of ViriCiti for $79.4 million in cash, as well as $7.1 million of additional earnout consideration contingent on meeting certain revenue targets as of January 31, 2023 (“ViriCiti Earnout”), which was paid in full on March 6, 2023 (see Note 18, Subsequent Events). ViriCiti is a Netherlands-based provider of electrification solutions for eBus and commercial fleets with offices in the Netherlands and the United States. The acquisition is expected to enhance ChargePoint’s fleet solutions portfolio of hardware, software and services by integrating information sources to optimize electric fleet operations.
The acquisition of ViriCiti was considered a business combination and was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. The total purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values on the acquisition date and the excess was recorded as goodwill. The total purchase price was allocated to $62.8 million of goodwill, $17.7 million of customer relationship intangible assets, and $6.6 million of developed technology intangible assets acquired, and deferred tax liabilities of $3.5 million and net liabilities of $0.2 million were assumed. Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. The Company incurred acquisition-related expenses of $2.3 million, which were recorded as general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.
There were no measurement period adjustments for the year ended January 31, 2023.
Acquisition of has•to•be gmbh
On October 6, 2021, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of has•to•be gmbh (“HTB”) for approximately $235.0 million, consisting of $132.9 million in cash and $102.1 million in the form of 5,695,176 shares of ChargePoint Common Stock valued at $17.92 per share on the acquisition date. Of the cash component, $2.8 million was paid on February 3, 2022 as part of a working capital adjustment and 885,692 shares, valued at $15.9 million, are held in escrow to cover indemnity claims the Company may make within eighteen months from the closing date. HTB is an Austria-based e-mobility provider with a European charging software platform. The acquisition is intended to expand the Company’s market share in Europe.
The acquisition of HTB was considered a business combination and was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. The total purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values on the acquisition date, and the excess was recorded as goodwill. The total purchase price was allocated to $159.0 million of goodwill, $78.7 million of customer relationship intangible assets, $12.7 million of developed technology intangible assets, and net assets of $2.9 million acquired, and deferred tax liabilities of $18.3 million were assumed. Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. The Company incurred acquisition-related expenses of $2.7 million, which were recorded as general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.
There were no measurement period adjustments for the year ended January 31, 2023.
82

6.    Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The following table summarizes the changes in carrying amounts of goodwill:
(in thousands)
Balance as of January 31, 2021$1,215
Goodwill acquired with ViriCiti acquisition62,839 
Goodwill acquired with HTB acquisition158,997 
Foreign exchange fluctuations(4,567)
Balance as of January 31, 2022$218,484
Foreign exchange fluctuations(4,768)
Balance as of January 31, 2023$213,716
There was no impairment recognized for the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.
Intangible Assets
The following table presents the details of intangible assets:
January 31, 2023
Cost (1)
Accumulated Amortization (1)
Net (1)
Useful Life
(amounts in thousands, useful lives in years)
Customer relationships$90,738 $(12,223)$78,515 10
Developed technology18,355 (4,197)14,158 6
$109,093 $(16,420)$92,673 
_______________
(1) Values are translated into U.S. Dollars at period-end foreign exchange rates.
January 31, 2022
Cost (1)
Accumulated Amortization (1)
Net (1)
Useful Life
(amounts in thousands, useful lives in years)
Customer relationships$93,065 $(3,223)$89,842 10
Developed technology18,731 (1,364)17,367 6
$111,796 $(4,587)$107,209 
_______________
(1) Values are translated into U.S. Dollars at period-end foreign exchange rates.
Amortization expense for customer relationships and developed technology is shown as sales and marketing and cost of revenue, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations. The acquired intangible assets and goodwill are subject to impairment review at least annually on December 31st. Based on the annual impairment analysis completed during the years ended January 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company determined that there was no impairment of intangible assets.
Acquisition-related intangible assets included in the above table are finite-lived and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives, which approximates the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are expected to be realized.
The following table presents the amortization expense related to intangible assets:
Year ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Amortization Expense$11,646 $4,617 $— 
The following table presents the estimated aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets:
83

Years Ending January 31,(in thousands)
2024$12,133 
202512,133 
202612,133 
202712,133 
202810,995 
Thereafter33,146 
Total amortization expense$92,673 
The expected amortization expense is an estimate. Actual amounts of amortization may differ from estimated amounts due to additional 188,235 Private Placement Warrants atintangible assets acquisitions, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, impairment of intangible assets, future changes to expected useful lives of intangible assets, and other events.
7.    Balance Sheet Components
Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
January 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Raw materials$11,509 $9,712 
Finished goods57,221 26,167 
Total Inventories$68,730 $35,879 
Prepaid expense and other current assets
Prepaid expense and other current assets consisted of the following:
January 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Prepaid expense$48,464 $16,951 
Other current assets22,556 19,652 
Total Prepaid Expense and Other Current Assets$71,020 $36,603 
Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following:
January 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Furniture and fixtures$1,244 $903 
Computers and software7,164 6,147 
Machinery and equipment25,144 16,193 
Tooling13,782 10,572 
Leasehold improvements9,357 10,549 
Owned and operated systems24,119 22,546 
Construction in progress2,790 2,720 
83,600 69,630 
Less: Accumulated depreciation(43,554)(35,037)
Total Property and Equipment, Net$40,046 $34,593 
The following table presents the depreciation expense related to fixed assets:
84

Year ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Depreciation Expense$13,404 $11,840 $10,083 
Accrued and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued and other current liabilities consisted of the following:
January 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Accrued expenses$46,105 $31,865 
Refundable customer deposits14,551 9,409 
Payroll and related expenses21,495 16,131 
Taxes payable14,232 8,955 
Other current liabilities(1)
37,100 17,968 
Total Accrued and Other Current Liabilities$133,483 $84,328 
_______________
(1) Beginning July 31, 2022, ViriCiti Earnout liability was reclassified from long-term liabilities to current liabilities as the Company expected the liability to be payable within twelve months of July 31, 2022. The ViriCiti Earnout liability was subsequently paid in full on March 6, 2023 (see Note 18, Subsequent Events).
8.    Leases
The Company leases its office facilities under non-cancellable operating leases with various lease terms. The Company also leases certain office equipment under operating lease agreements. As of January 31, 2023, non-cancellable leases expire on various dates between fiscal years 2024 and 2030.
Generally, the Company's non-cancellable leases include renewal options to extend the lease term from one to five years. The Company has not included any renewal options in its lease terms as these options are not reasonably certain of being exercised. The lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
As of January 31, 2023 and 2022, lease balances were as follows:
January 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Operating leases
Operating lease right-of-use assets$22,242 $25,535 
Operating lease liabilities, current3,753 3,876 
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent21,841 25,370 
Total operating lease liabilities$25,594 $29,246 
The Company recognizes operating lease costs on a pricestraight-line basis over the lease period. Lease expense for the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 was $6.6 million, $6.1 million, and $5.1 million, respectively. Operating lease costs for short-term leases and variable lease costs were not material during the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
85

Future payments of operating lease liabilities under the Company’s non-cancellable operating leases as of January 31, 2023 were as follows:
(in thousands)
Years Ending January 31,
2024$6,657 
20256,186 
20264,983 
20274,682 
20284,087 
Thereafter6,233 
Total undiscounted operating lease payments$32,828 
Less: imputed interest(7,234)
Total operating lease liabilities$25,594 
Other supplemental information as of January 31, 2023 and 2022 was as follows:
January 31,
20232022
Lease Term and Discount Rate
Weighted-average remaining operating lease term (years)5.76.5
Weighted-average operating lease discount rate7.3 %7.3 %
Other supplemental cash flow information for the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was as follows:
Year ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for amounts in the measurement of operating lease liabilities$6,927 $5,164 $4,226 
As of January 31, 2023, the Company has no additional operating leases that have not yet commenced and as such, have not yet been recognized on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
9.    Debt
2018 Loan
In July 2018, the Company entered into a term loan facility with certain lenders (the “2018 Loan”) with a borrowing capacity of $45.0 million to finance working capital and repay all outstanding amounts owed under previous loans. The Company borrowed $35.0 million, with issuance costs of $1.1 million and net proceeds of approximately $282,000.

Each whole Private Placement Warrant is exercisable$33.9 million. The 2018 Loan was secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, contained customary affirmative and negative covenants, and required the Company to maintain minimum cash balances and attain certain customer billing targets. The 2018 Loan had a five-year maturity and interest was calculated at LIBOR plus 6.55%. Transaction costs were recorded as debt discount and amortized over the term of the loan. The 2018 Loan agreement was amended on March 20, 2019 to extend the interest only monthly payments through June 30, 2021 to be followed by equal monthly payments of principal and interest.

In March 2021, the Company repaid the entire loan balance of $35.0 million plus accrued interest and prepayment fees of $1.2 million. There was no interest expense incurred during the year ended January 31, 2023. Total interest expense incurred was $1.5 million and $3.3 million for one whole sharethe years ended January 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
2027 Convertible Notes
The following table presents the Company’s convertible debt outstanding:
January 31, 2023
Gross
Amount
Debt Discount and Issuance CostsCarrying
Amount
Estimated Fair Value
(in thousands)
2027 Convertible Notes$300,000 $(5,064)$294,936 $233,000 
86

The following table presents the Company’s interest expense related to convertible debt:
Year ended January 31,
2023
(in thousands)
Contractual interest expense$8,429 
Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs965
Total interest expense$9,394

In April 2022, the Company completed a priceprivate placement of $11.50 per share. A portion$300 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured Convertible Senior PIK Toggle Notes (the “2027 Convertible Notes”), which will mature on April 1, 2027. The 2027 Convertible Notes were sold in a private placement in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
The net proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants to the Sponsor was added to the proceeds from the Initial Public Offering held in the Trust Account. If the Company does not complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period, the Private Placement Warrants will expire worthless. The Private Placement Warrants will be non-redeemable for cash2027 Convertible Notes were approximately $294.0 million after deducting initial purchaser discounts and exercisable on a cashless basis so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees.

The Sponsorcommissions and the Company’s officersoffering expenses. The debt discount and directors agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell anyissuance costs, net of their Private Placement Warrants until 30 days afteraccumulated amortization, are reported as a direct deduction from the completionface amount of the initial Business Combination.

Related Party Loans

On May 16, 2019,2027 Convertible Notes. The Company expects to use the Sponsor agreed to loan the Company an aggregate of up to $300,000 to cover organizational expenses and expenses relatednet proceeds for general corporate purposes.

The 2027 Convertible Notes bear interest at 3.50% per annum, to the Initial Public Offering pursuantextent paid in cash (“Cash Interest”) or 5.00% per annum, to a promissory note (the “Note”the extent paid in kind through the issuance of additional 2027 Convertible Notes (“PIK Interest”). This loanInterest is non-interest bearingpayable semi-annually in arrears on April 1st and payableOctober 1st of each year, beginning on October 1, 2022. The Company can elect to make any interest payment through Cash Interest, PIK Interest or any combination thereof.
The 2027 Convertible Notes are convertible, based on the completion of the Initial Public Offering. The Company borrowed approximately $251,000 under the Note, and then repaid the Note in full to the Sponsor on August 12, 2019.


SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In addition, in order to finance transaction costs in connection with a Business Combination, the Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor, or certainapplicable conversion rate, into cash, shares of the Company’s officersCommon Stock or a combination thereof, at the Company’s election. The initial conversion rate was 41.6119 shares per $1,000 principal amount of the 2027 Convertible Notes, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustment in certain circumstances, which represented an initial conversion price of approximately $24.03 per share.

Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding January 1, 2027, the 2027 Convertible Notes will be convertible at the option of the holders only upon the occurrence of specified events and directorsduring certain periods, and will be convertible on or after January 1, 2027, at any time until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date of the 2027 Convertible Notes.
Holders of the 2027 Convertible Notes may but are not obligatedconvert all or a portion of their 2027 Convertible Notes prior to loan the Company funds as may be required (“Working Capital Loans”). Ifclose of business on January 1, 2027, only under the Company completes a Business Combination,following circumstances:
during any calendar quarter commencing after the Company would repaycalendar quarter ended on September 30, 2022, if the Working Capital LoansCompany’s closing Common Stock price for at least 20 trading days out of the proceedsmost recent 30 consecutive trading days of the Trust Account releasedpreceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the current conversion price of the 2027 Convertible Notes on each applicable trading day;
during the five business day period after any ten consecutive trading days in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of 2027 Convertible Notes for each trading day of such ten consecutive trading day period is less than 98% of the product of the Company’s closing Common Stock price and the conversion rate of the 2027 Convertible Notes on each such trading day;
if the Company calls the 2027 Convertible Notes for redemption, at any time prior to the Company. Otherwise,close of business on the Working Capital Loans wouldsecond business day immediately preceding the redemption date; or
upon the occurrence of specified corporate events, including certain distributions, the occurrence of a fundamental change or a transaction resulting in the Company’s Common Stock converting into other securities or property or assets.
The 2027 Convertible Notes will be repaid only outredeemable, in whole or in part, at the Company’s option at any time on or after April 21, 2025, and before the 41st scheduled trading day immediately before the maturity date. The redemption price will be equal to the aggregate principal amount of funds held outside the Trust Account.2027 Convertible Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the redemption date. In addition, a holder may elect to convert its 2027 Convertible Notes during any such redemption period, in which case the eventapplicable conversion rate may be increased in certain circumstances if 2027 Convertible Notes are converted after they are called for redemption.
Additionally, if the Company undergoes a fundamental change or a change in control transaction (each such term as defined in the indenture governing the 2027 Convertible Notes), subject to certain conditions, holders may require the Company to purchase for cash all or any portion of their 2027 Convertible Notes. The fundamental change repurchase price will be 100% of the capitalized principal amount of the 2027 Convertible Notes, while the change in control repurchase price will be 125% of the capitalized principal
87

amount of the 2027 Convertible Notes to be purchased, in each case plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
The indenture governing the 2027 Convertible Notes includes a restrictive covenant that, subject to specified exceptions, limits the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to incur secured debt in excess of $750.0 million. In addition, the indenture governing the 2027 Convertible Notes contains customary terms and covenants, including certain events of default in which case either the trustee or the holders of at least 25% of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 2027 Convertible Notes may declare 100% of the principal of, and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on, all the 2027 Convertible Notes to be due and payable immediately.
As of January 31, 2023, the effective interest rate on the 2027 Convertible Notes was 3.93%. Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs is reported as a component of interest expenses and is computed using the straight-line method over the term of the 2027 Convertible Notes, which approximates the effective interest method.
The estimated fair value of the 2027 Convertible Notes, as of January 31, 2023 using Level 2 fair value inputs, was $233.0 million.
10.    Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase Commitments
Open purchase commitments are for the purchase of goods and services related to, but not limited to, manufacturing, facilities, and professional services under non-cancellable contracts. They were not recorded as liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as of January 31, 2023 and 2022 as the Company had not yet received the related goods or services.
Legal Proceedings
The Company may be involved from time to time in various lawsuits, claims, and proceedings, including intellectual property, commercial, securities, and employment matters that arise in the normal course of business. The Company accrues a liability when management believes information available prior to the issuance of the consolidated financial statements indicates it is probable a loss has been incurred as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company adjusts its accruals to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Legal costs are expensed as incurred.
The Company believes it has recorded adequate provisions for any such lawsuits, claims, and proceedings and, as of January 31, 2023, the Company believes it was not reasonably possible that a Business Combination does not close,material loss had been incurred in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Based on its experience, the Company may use a portionbelieves that damage amounts claimed in these matters are not meaningful indicators of proceeds held outsidepotential liability. Given the Trust Account to repayinherent uncertainties of litigation, the Working Capital Loans but no proceeds held inultimate outcome of the Trust Account wouldongoing matters described herein cannot be used to repaypredicted with certainty. While litigation is inherently unpredictable, the Working Capital Loans. Except for the foregoing, the terms of such Working Capital Loans, if any, have not been determined and no written agreements existCompany believes it has valid defenses with respect to the legal matters pending against it. Nevertheless, the consolidated financial statements could be materially adversely affected in a particular period by the resolution of one or more of these contingencies. Liabilities established to provide for contingencies are adjusted as further information develops, circumstances change, or contingencies are resolved; and such loans. The Working Capital Loans would either be repaid upon consummationchanges are recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of a Business Combination, without interest, or, at the lender’s discretion, up to $1.5 million of such Working Capital Loans may be convertible into warrants of the post Business Combination entity at a price of $1.50 per warrant. The warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants. To date, the Company had no borrowings under the Working Capital Loans.

Administrative Services Agreement

Commencing on the date that the securities of the Company were first listed on the New York Stock Exchange and continuing until the earlier of the Company’s consummation of its initial Business Combination or the Company’s liquidation, the Company has agreed to pay the Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space, utilities, secretarial support and administrative services. The Company recorded an aggregate of $50,000operations during the period from May 10, 2019 (inception) through December 31, 2019of the change and reflected in generalaccrued and administrative expenses in connection with the related agreement inother current liabilities on the accompanying statement of operations.

NOTE 5. COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES

Registration Rights

consolidated balance sheets.

Guarantees and Indemnifications
The holders of Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of Working Capital Loans, if any, (and any shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of Working Capital Loans and upon conversion of the Founder Shares) will be entitled to registration rights pursuant to a registration rights agreement. These holders will be entitledCompany has service level commitments to certain demandof its customers warranting certain levels of uptime reliability and “piggyback” registration rights. However, the registration rights agreement provides that the Company will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Actperformance and permitting those customers to become effective until the termination of the applicable lock-up period for the securities to be registered. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

Underwriting Agreement

Except for the Affiliated Units, the underwriters were entitled to an underwriting discount of $0.20 per unit, or $5.96 million in the aggregate, paid upon closing of the Initial Public Offering. An additional fee of approximately $282,000 in the aggregate was due in connection with the closing of the sale of the Over-allotment Units.

In addition, $0.35 per unit (but not including the Affiliated Units), or approximately $10.92 million in the aggregate will be payable to the underwriters for deferred underwriting commissions. The deferred fee will become payable to the underwriters from the amounts held in the Trust Account solelyreceive credits in the event that the Company completesfails to meet those levels. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a Business Combination,result of such commitments.

The Company’s arrangements generally include certain provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if its products or services infringe a third-party’s intellectual property rights. Additionally, the Company may be required to indemnify for claims caused by its negligence or willful misconduct. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification obligations due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such obligations and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company has also agreed to indemnify its directors and executive officers for costs associated with any fees, expenses, judgments, fines, and settlement amounts incurred by them in any action or proceeding to which any of them are, or are threatened to be, made a party by reason of their service as a director or officer. The Company maintains director and officer insurance coverage that would generally enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. The Company also may be subject to indemnification obligations by law with respect to the termsactions of its employees under certain circumstances and in certain jurisdictions.
88

Letters of Credit
The Company had $30.4 million and $0.4 million of secured letters of credit outstanding as of January 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. These primarily relate to support of contract manufacturer and customer agreements, and are fully collateralized by cash deposits which the Company recorded in restricted cash on its consolidated balance sheets based on the term of the underwriting agreement.

remaining restriction.

SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Class A

11.    Common Stock

The

As of each of January 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company iswas authorized to issue 200,000,0001,000,000,000 shares of Class A common stockCommon Stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2019, thereThere were 31,411,763 Class A ordinary348,330,481 and 334,760,615 shares issued orand outstanding including 30,047,981 Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption.

Class B Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 sharesas of Class B common stock. In May 2019, the Company issued 8,625,000 shares of Class B common stock, including an aggregate of up to 1,125,000 shares of Class B common stock that are subject to forfeiture to the Company by the Sponsor for no consideration to the extent that the underwriters’ over-allotment option is not exercised in full or in part. On September 6, 2019, the underwriters partially purchased the Over-allotment Units,January 31, 2023 and the remaining over-allotment option subsequently expired. As a result, an aggregate of 772,059 Class B common stock were forfeited accordingly.

Prior to the initial Business Combination, only2022, respectively.

The holders of the Company’s Class B common stock will have the right to vote on the election of directors. Holders of the Class A common stock will not beCommon Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on the election of directors during such time. These provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation may only be amended if approved by a majority of at least 90% of the Company’s common stock voting at a stockholder meeting. With respect to any other matterall matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders, including any vote in connection with the initial Business Combination, except as required by applicable law or stock exchange rule,stockholders. The holders of the Company’s Class A common stock and holders of the Company’s Class B common stock will vote together as a single class, with each share entitling the holderCommon Stock are not entitled to one vote.

The Class B common stock will automatically convert into Class A common stock at the time of the initial Business Combination on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment. In the case that additional shares of Class A common stock, or equity-linked securities, are issued or deemed issued in excess of the amounts sold in the Initial Public Offering and related to the closing of the initial Business Combination, the ratio at which shares of Class B common stock shall convert into shares of Class A common stock will be adjusted (unless the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Class B common stock agree to waive such adjustmentcumulative voting rights with respect to any such issuance or deemed issuance) sothe election of directors, and as a consequence, minority stockholders are not able to elect directors on the basis of their votes alone. Subject to preferences that the number ofmay be applicable to any shares of Class A commonredeemable convertible preferred stock issuable upon conversion of all shares of Class B common stock will equal,currently outstanding or issued in the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 20%future, holders of the sum of the total number of all shares of common stock outstanding upon the completion of the Initial Public Offering plus all shares of Class A common stock and equity-linked securities issued or deemed issued in connection with the Business Combination (excluding any shares or equity-linked securities issued, orCommon Stock are entitled to be issued, to any seller in the Business Combination).

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, withreceive ratably such designations, voting and other rights and preferencesdividends as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors. As of December 31, 2019, there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

Warrants

Public Warrants may only be exercised for a whole number of shares. No fractional Public Warrants will be issued upon separation of the Units and only whole Public Warrants will trade. The Public Warrants will become exercisable on the later of (a) 30 days after the completion of a Business Combination or (b) 12 months from the closing of the Initial Public Offering; provided in each case that the Company has an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available (or the Company permits holders to exercise their Public Warrants on a cashless basis and such cashless exercise is exempt from registration under the Securities Act). The Company has agreed that as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days after the closing of a Business Combination, the Company will use its best efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement for the registration, under the Securities Act, of the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants. The Company will use its best efforts to cause the same to become effective and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement, and a current prospectus relating thereto, until the expiration of the Public Warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement. Notwithstanding the above, if the Class A common stock is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that it satisfies the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, the Company may, at its option, require holders of Public Warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless” basis, and, in the event the Company so elects, the Company will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, but the Company will be required to use its best efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. The Public Warrants will expire five years after the completion of a Business Combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.


SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Private Placement Warrants are identical to the Public Warrants, except that the Private Placement Warrants and the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Private Placement Warrants will not be transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the completion of a Business Combination, subject to certain limited exceptions. Additionally, the Private Placement Warrants will be non-redeemable for cash so long as they are held by the Sponsor or its permitted transferees. If the Private Placement Warrants are held by someone other than the Sponsor or its permitted transferees, the Private Placement Warrants will be redeemable by the Company and exercisable by such holders on the same basis as the Public Warrants.

The Company may call the Public Warrants for redemption:

in whole and not in part;
at a price of $0.01 per warrant;
upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption; and
if, and only if, the last sales price of the Class A common stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share on each of 20 trading days within the 30-trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the Company sends the notice of redemption to the warrant holders.

If the Company calls the Public Warrants for redemption, management will have the option to require all holders that wish to exercise the Public Warrants to do so on a “cashless basis,” as described in the warrant agreement.

In addition, commencing 90 days after the warrants become exercisable, the Company may redeem the outstanding warrants for shares of Class A common stock (including both Public Warrants and Private Placement Warrants):

in whole and not in part;
at a price equal to a number of shares of Class A common stock to be determined by reference to the agreed table set forth in the warrant agreement based on the redemption date and the “fair market value” of the Class A common stock;
upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption; and
if, and only if, the last sale price of the Class A common stock equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (as adjusted) on the trading day prior to the date on which the Company sends the notice of redemption to the warrant holders.

The exercise price and number of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend, or recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. In addition, if the Company issues additional shares of common stock or equity-linked securities for capital raising purposes in connection with the closing of the initial Business Combination at an issue price or effective issue price of less than $9.20 per share of common stock (with such issue price or effective issue price to be determined in good faithdeclared by the Company’s board of directors out of funds legally available therefor. In the event of the Company’s liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, holders of the Company’s Common Stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and the liquidation preference of any then outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock. Holders of Common Stock have no preemptive rights and no right to convert their Common Stock into any other securities. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Common Stock.

At-the-Market Offering
On July 1, 2022, ChargePoint filed a registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-265986) with the SEC (that was declared effective by the SEC on July 12, 2022), which permits the Company to offer up to $1.0 billion of Common Stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and rights in one or more offerings and in any combination, including in units from time to time (the “Shelf Registration Statement”). As part of the caseShelf Registration Statement, ChargePoint filed a prospectus supplement registering for sale from time to time up to $500.0 million of any such issuanceCommon Stock pursuant to a sales agreement (the “ATM Facility”).
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023, the Company sold a total of 4,657,806 shares of its Common Stock pursuant to the Sponsor or its affiliates, without takingATM Facility at the prevailing market prices for total proceeds of $49.5 million, net of $0.5 million of issuance costs.
12.    Stock Warrants and Earnout
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants
Warrants to purchase shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock were initially recognized as a liability recorded at fair value upon issuance and were subject to remeasurement to fair value at each balance sheet date. As part of the Merger, Legacy ChargePoint redeemable convertible preferred stock was converted into account any Founder Shares held byLegacy ChargePoint common stock pursuant to the Sponsor or such affiliates, as applicable,conversion rate effective immediately prior to such issuance) (the “Newly Issued Price”),the Merger while all related Legacy ChargePoint preferred stock warrants were converted into warrants exercisable for shares of Common Stock with terms consistent with the Legacy ChargePoint preferred stock warrants except for the number of shares exercisable therefor and the exercise price, each of which was adjusted using the Exchange Ratio (see Note 5, Reverse Capitalization and Business Combinations, for more details). At that time, the redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability was remeasured and reclassified to additional paid-in capital.
The liability associated with these warrants was subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date using the Level 3 fair value inputs. See Note 3, Fair Value Measurements,for further details.
The Level 3 fair value inputs used in the recurring valuation of the redeemable convertible preferred stock warrant liability were as follows:
February 26, 2021
(Merger Date)
January 31, 2021January 31, 2020
Expected volatility84.3 %80.5 %58.4 %
Risk-free interest rate0.0 %0.1 %1.6 %
Dividend rate0.0 %0.0 %0.0 %
Expected term (years)01.42.0
89

Common Stock Warrants
Legacy ChargePoint had outstanding warrants to purchase shares of Legacy ChargePoint common stock (collectively, “Legacy Warrants”), which now represent warrants to purchase Common Stock. Immediately following the Merger, there were 38,761,031 Legacy Warrants outstanding which are classified as equity.
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 and 2022, 1,039,153 and 3,222,442 Legacy Warrants were exercised resulting in the issuance of 1,037,808 and 2,906,689 shares of Common Stock. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 and 2022, proceeds received from the exercise of Legacy Warrants were $6.9 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
As of January 31, 2023, there were 34,499,436 Legacy Warrants outstanding which are classified as equity.
January 31, 2023
Outstanding WarrantsExpiration Date
Number of
Warrants
Exercise
Price
Common Stock20,922,215 $6.03 7/31/2030 – 8/4/2030
Common Stock13,577,221 $9.04 11/16/2028 – 2/13/2029
Total outstanding common stock warrants34,499,436 
January 31, 2022
Outstanding WarrantsExpiration Date
Number of
Warrants
Exercise
Price
Common Stock21,727,177 $1.25 - $6.033/4/2022 - 8/6/2030
Common Stock13,811,412 $9.04 11/16/2028 – 2/14/2029
Total outstanding common stock warrants35,538,589 
Private Placement Warrants
The Private Placement Warrants were initially recognized as a liability on February 26, 2021, at a fair value of $127.9 million and the Private Placement Warrant liability was remeasured to fair value as of any respective exercise dates. The Company recorded an immaterial loss and a gain of $63.7 million for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, classified within change in fair value of warrant liabilities in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Private Placement Warrants were valued using the assumptions under the BLM that assumes optimal exercise of the Company’s redemption option at the earliest possible date. On February 21, 2022, the Company redeemed the remaining Private Placement Warrants for 0.355 shares of Common Stock per warrant. As of January 31, 2023, there were zero Private Placement Warrants outstanding.
January 31,
2022
February 26, 2021 (Merger Date)
Market price of public stock$13.85 $30.83 
Exercise price$11.50 $11.50 
Expected term (years)4.15.0
Volatility70.5 %73.5 %
Risk-free interest rate1.0 %0.8 %
Dividend rate0.0 %0.0 %
Public Warrants
The Public Warrants were initially recognized as a liability on February 26, 2021 at a fair value of $153.7 million and the public warrant liability was remeasured to fair value based upon the market price as warrants were exercised. On June 4, 2021 the Company issued a redemption notice pursuant to which all but 244,481 Public Warrants were exercised by the Public Warrant holders. At the conclusion of the redemption notice period on July 6, 2021, the Company redeemed the remaining 244,481 Public Warrants outstanding for $0.01 per warrant. As of January 31, 2023, no Public Warrants remained outstanding.
The Company recognized no gain or loss for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023, and a loss of $15.9 million for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2022, classified within change in fair value of warrant liabilities in the consolidated statements of operations.
During the fiscal years ended January 31, 2023 and 2022, proceeds received from the exercise of Public Warrants were zero and $117.6 million, respectively.
90

Warrant Activity
Activity of warrants is set forth below:
Legacy WarrantsPrivate Placement Warrants
Total
Common Stock Warrants
Outstanding as of January 31, 202235,538,589 10,435 35,549,024 
Warrants Exercised(1,039,153)(10,435)(1,049,588)
Outstanding as of January 31, 202334,499,43634,499,436
Contingent Earnout Liability
During the five year period starting at the closing of the Merger (“Earnout Period”), eligible former equity holders of Legacy ChargePoint were eligible to receive up to 27,000,000 additional shares of Common Stock (“Earnout Shares”) in three equal tranches if the Earnout Triggering Events (as described in the Merger Agreement) were fully satisfied. The three Earnout Triggering Events were the dates on which the closing volume weighted-average price (“VWAP”) per share of common stock quoted on the NYSE (or the exchange on which the shares of the Company’s Common Stock are then listed) is greater or equal to $15.00, $20.00 and $30.00, respectively, for any ten trading days within any 20 consecutive trading day period within the Earnout Period.
Upon the closing of the Merger, the contingent obligation to issue Earnout Shares was accounted for as a liability because the Earnout Triggering Events that determine the number of Earnout Shares required to be issued include events that are not solely indexed to the Common Stock of ChargePoint. The estimated fair value of the total Earnout Shares at the closing of the Merger on February 26, 2021, was $828.2 million based on a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model using a distribution of potential outcomes on a monthly basis over the Earnout Period using the most reliable information available. Assumptions used in the valuation are described below.
March 12,
2021
February 26,
2021
Current stock price$27.84 $30.83 
Expected volatility72.00 %71.60 %
Risk-free interest rate0.85 %0.75 %
Dividend rate0.00 %0.00 %
Expected term (years)4.965.00
The first two Earnout Triggering Events for up to 18,000,000 of the Earnout Shares occurred on March 12, 2021, and, after withholding some of these Earnout Shares to cover employee withholding tax obligations, 17,539,657 Earnout Shares were issued on March 19, 2021, and the estimated fair value of the earnout liability was remeasured to $743.7 million, including (i) $501.1 million related to the Earnout Shares issuable upon the occurrence of the Earnout Triggering Event associated with the $15.00 and $20.00 VWAP per share thresholds based on the Common Stock price as of March 12, 2021, and (ii) $242.6 million related to the estimated fair value of earnout liability related to the remaining 9,000,000 Earnout Shares issuable upon the occurrence of the Earnout Triggering Event associated with the $30.00 VWAP per share threshold based on a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model as of March 12, 2021, as described above. The change in fair value resulted in a gain of $84.4 million recognized in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended April 30, 2021. Upon settlement of the first two tranches, the classification of the remaining 9,000,000 Earnout Shares of the third tranche was changed to equity on March 12, 2021, because the Earnout Shares became an instrument contingently issuable upon the occurrence of the Earnout Triggering Event into a fixed number of Common Shares that is not based on an observable market price or index other than the Company’s own stock price.
The third and final Earnout Triggering Event for up to 9,000,000 of the Earnout Shares associated with the $30.00 VWAP per share threshold occurred on June 29, 2021, and, after the withholding of some of these Earnout Shares to cover employee withholding tax obligations, 8,773,596 Earnout Shares were issued on July 1, 2021.
No further Earnout Shares remained contingently issuable as of January 31, 2023 and 2022.
91

13.    Equity Plans and Stock-Based Compensation
The following sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense for employee equity plans included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Cost of revenue$4,351 $3,782 $115 
Research and development37,967 25,461 1,807 
Sales and marketing17,393 9,154 1,501 
General and administrative33,639 28,934 1,524 
Total stock-based compensation expense$93,350 $67,331 $4,947 
As of January 31, 2023, the Company had unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, RSUs, PRSUs, and ESPP of $191.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years.
2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On February 25, 2021, the stockholders of the Company approved the 2021 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2021 ESPP”). The 2021 ESPP permits participants to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock, up to the IRS allowable limit, through contributions (in the form of payroll deductions or otherwise to the extent permitted by the administrator) of up to 15% of their eligible compensation. The 2021 ESPP provides for consecutive, overlapping 24-month offering periods, subject to certain rollover and reset mechanisms as defined in the ESPP. Participants are permitted to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the end of each 6-month purchase period at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the first trading day of an offering period or on the last trading date of each purchase period. A participant may purchase a maximum of 10,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock during a purchase period. Participants may end their participation at any time during an offering and will be adjusted (torefunded any accrued contributions that have not yet been used to purchase shares. Participation ends automatically upon termination of employment with the nearest cent)Company. The initial offering period is from October 1, 2021 through September 9, 2023. Thereafter, offering periods will begin on March 10 and September 10.
Further, on the first day of each March during the term of the 2021 ESPP, commencing on March 1, 2021 and ending on (and including) March 1, 2040, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 2021 ESPP shall automatically increase by a number equal to the lesser of (i) one percent (1%) of the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on the last day of the preceding month, (ii) 5,400,000 shares of Common Stock (subject to standard anti-dilution adjustments), or (iii) a number of shares of Common Stock determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. As of January 31, 2023, 10,919,906 shares of Common Stock were available under the 2021 ESPP.
During the year ended January 31, 2023, the Company's employees purchased 607,384 shares of its Common Stock under the 2021 ESPP. The shares were purchased at a weighted-average purchase price of $14.73 per share, with proceeds of $8.9 million.
2021 Equity Incentive Plan
On February 25, 2021, the stockholders of the Company approved the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (“2021 EIP”). Under the 2021 EIP, the Company can grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), and certain other awards which are settled in the form of shares of Common Stock issued under this 2021 EIP. On the first day of each March, beginning on March 1, 2021 and continuing through March 1, 2030, the 2021 EIP reserve will automatically increase by a number equal to the lesser of (a) 5% of the total number of shares of Common Stock actually issued and outstanding on the last day of the preceding month and (b) a number of shares of Common Stock determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. As of January 31, 2023, 39,406,473 shares of Common Stock were available under the 2021 EIP.
There were no options granted for the year ended January 31, 2023.
92

Restricted Stock Units
The 2021 EIP provides for the issuance of RSUs to employees and directors. A summary of activity of RSUs under the 2021 EIP at January 31, 2023 and changes during the periods then ended is presented in the following table:
 Number of SharesWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share
Outstanding as of January 31, 20224,033,418 $26.27 
RSU granted13,044,848 $12.72 
RSU vested(3,066,215)$19.06 
RSU forfeited(1,076,638)$17.69 
Outstanding as of January 31, 202312,935,413 $15.02 
The total grant date fair value of RSUs vested during the year ended January 31, 2023 was $58.4 million.
Performance Restricted Stock Units
On June 1, 2022, pursuant to the 2021 EIP, the Company granted PRSUs to certain officers, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Subsequently, on September 1, 2022, the Company granted additional PRSUs to one of its newly-hired officers. Vesting of the PRSUs is dependent upon the satisfaction of both market- and service-based conditions. The market-based condition is achieved if the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock is greater than or equal to the applicable stock price appreciation target for at least 20 consecutive trading days at any time during the period beginning the date of the grant and ending on the expiration date. There are three stock appreciation targets applicable to each PRSU award, the achievement of which will cause the market-based condition to be equal to 115% of the Newly Issued Price.

In no event will the Company be required to net cash settle any warrant. If the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period and the Company liquidates the funds held in the Trust Account, holders of warrants will not receive any of such fundssatisfied with respect to their warrants, northe following percentage of each award (each of which is called a tranche): $17 per share/25% of the total PRSUs, $22 per share/35% of the total PRSUs and $30 per share/40% of the total PRSUs.

For officers other than the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the service-based conditions applicable to 1/20th of the PRSUs subject to each tranche will they receive any distributionbe satisfied if such officer remains in continuous service from the Company’s assets held outsidedate of the Trust Account withgrant until each PRSU vesting date occurring after June 20, 2022 or, if later, until the respectfirst PRSU vesting date after the applicable stock price appreciation target is achieved. The PRSUs vesting dates are each March 20th, June 20th, September 20th, and December 20th. For the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the service-based conditions applicable to such warrants.1/12th of the PRSUs subject to each tranche will be satisfied if he remains in continuous service from the date of the grant until each PRSU vesting date occurring after June 20, 2024 or, if later, until the first PRSU vesting date after the applicable stock price appreciation target is achieved.
A summary of activity of PRSUs under the 2021 EIP at January 31, 2023 and changes during the periods then ended is presented in the following table:
 Number of SharesWeighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share
Outstanding as of January 31, 2022— $— 
PRSU granted2,266,754 $10.81 
PRSU forfeited(119,388)$10.47 
Outstanding as of January 31, 20232,147,366 $10.83 
2017 Plan and 2007 Plan
In fiscal year 2022, the Company terminated its 2017 Stock Option Plan (the “2017 Plan”) and 2007 Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Plan”). No further awards will be granted under the 2017 and 2007 Plans. As of January 31, 2023, 15,746,369 shares and 1,854,155 shares of Common Stock remain reserved for outstanding awards issued under the 2017 and 2007 Plans, respectively. Stock-based awards forfeited, cancelled or repurchased from the above plans generally are returned to the pool of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the 2021 EIP Plan.
93

Stock Options Activity
A summary of option activity under the 2017 and 2007 Plans at January 31, 2022 and changes during the periods then ended is presented in the following table:
Number of
Stock Option
Awards
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining Contractual term
(in years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding as of January 31, 202222,200,869 $0.68 6.6$292,362 
Granted— $— 
Exercised(4,201,592)$0.60 
Cancelled(398,753)$0.76 
Outstanding as of January 31, 202317,600,524 $0.70 5.6$201,352 
Options vested and expected to vest as of January 31, 202317,578,098 $0.70 5.6$201,097 
Exercisable as of January 31, 202314,356,582 $0.69 5.2$164,436 
The options outstanding as of January 31, 2023, include the June 2020 grant of a stock option under the 2017 Plan to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer to purchase a total of 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock (“CEO Award”) originally subject to both service and performance-based vesting conditions. No stock-based compensation expense had been recorded prior to the Merger as the CEO Awards were improbable of vesting before and after two modifications in each of September 2020 and December 2020, because the performance-based vesting condition was contingent upon the closing of the Merger. Accordingly, the warrants may expire worthless.

Company commenced recognition of stock-based compensation expense for the CEO Award following the Merger in February 2021 when the only remaining vesting condition was service-based. As of January 31, 2023 and 2022, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of the CEO Award was $14.1 million and $28.4 million, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.0 years.

SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table presents information aboutCompany did not grant any options during the Company’s assets that are measured atyears ended January 31, 2023 and 2022. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the year ended January 31, 2021 was $0.94 per share. The total fair value of options vested during the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021 was $2.0 million, $3.4 million, and $5.4 million, respectively.

Determination of Fair Value
The Company records stock-based compensation based on a recurring basis asthe grant date fair value of December 31, 2019the equity instruments issued to employees and indicatesuses different appropriate methods to establish the fair value hierarchydepending on the features of the valuation techniques thatawards. The grant date fair value of RSUs equals the Company utilized to determine such fair value.

December 31, 2019         
Description Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)  Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Marketable securities held in Trust Account $316,398,889  $  $ 

Level 1 instruments include investments in money market funds and U.S. Treasury securities.value of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date. The Company uses inputs such as actual trade data, benchmark yields, quotedutilizes the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to establish the fair value of stock options and ESPP, and the Monte Carlo simulation model to establish the fair value of PRSUs containing a market prices from dealers or brokers, and other similar sourcescondition.

The weighted-average assumptions in the Black-Scholes option-pricing models used to determine the fair value of its investments.

NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES

ESPP rights granted during the year ended January 31, 2023 were as follows:


Year Ended January 31,
20232022
Expected volatility64.9% - 72.2%61.8% - 73.5%
Risk-free interest rate0.8% - 3.6%0.1% - 0.3%
Dividend rate0.0 %0.0 %
Expected term (in years)0.5 - 2.00.4 - 1.9
Expected volatility: The income tax provision consistsexpected volatility was determined by using a blended volatility approach of peer volatility and implied volatility. Peer volatility was calculated as the average of historical volatilities of selected industry peers deemed to be comparable to ChargePoint’s business corresponding to the expected term of the following:

  For The Period From
May 10,
2019
(Inception) Through December 31,
2019
 
Current   
Federal $479,064 
State  - 
Deferred    
Federal  (222,823)
State  - 
Valuation allowance  222,823 
Income tax provision $479,064 

awards.

SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Risk-free interest rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for zero-coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities corresponding to the expected term of the awards.

Expected dividend yield: The expected dividend rate is zero as ChargePoint currently has no history or expectation of declaring dividends on its Common Stock.
Expected term: The expected term represents the length of time the ESPP rights under each purchase period are outstanding.
94

The weighted-average assumptions in the Monte Carlo valuation model used to determine the fair value of PRSUs granted during the year ended January 31, 2023 were as follows:
Year Ended January 31, 2023
Expected volatility72.1% - 74.0%
Risk-free interest rate2.8% - 3.3%
Dividend rate0.0 %
Expected term (in years)0.3 - 4.8
Expected volatility: The expected volatility was determined using a blended volatility approach of historical volatility and implied volatility.
Risk-free interest rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturities yield curve in effect at the time of grant for zero-coupon U.S. Treasury notes with maturities approximately equal to the expected term of the options.
Expected dividend yield: The expected dividend rate is zero as the Company currently has no history or expectation of declaring dividends on its Common Stock.
Expected term: The expected term input for the award with a market condition is based upon the derived service period (“DSP”). The DSP represents the duration of the median of the distribution of stock-price paths on which the market condition is satisfied.
14.    Income Taxes
The components of net loss before income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Domestic$(342,999)$(131,916)$(197,908)
Foreign(4,276)(3,255)1,082 
Net loss before income taxes$(347,275)$(135,171)$(196,826)
The components of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Current
Federal$— $— $— 
State44 17 47 
Foreign1,345 359 151 
Total current$1,389 $376 $198 
Deferred
Federal$$(1,242)$— 
State— (423)— 
Foreign(3,557)(1,641)— 
Total deferred(3,556)(3,306)— 
Total provision for income taxes$(2,167)$(2,930)$198 
95

A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Company’s neteffective tax rate was as follows:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
Tax at federal statutory rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
State tax rate, net— %— %— %
Warrant and earnout revaluation— %20.9 %(7.8 %)
Stock-based compensation— %8.0 %(0.2 %)
Intangible assets amortization— %1.3 %— %
Change in valuation allowance(18.9 %)(45.5 %)(13.6 %)
Transaction cost— %(1.2 %)— %
Research and development tax credits0.8 %2.8 %1.1 %
Section 162(m) executive compensation limitation(1.2)%(5.3)%— %
Other(1.1)%0.2 %(0.6)%
Effective tax rate0.6 %2.2 %(0.1)%
The significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets areand liabilities as of January 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:

  December 31,
2019
 
Deferred tax assets:   
Start Up/Organization Costs $222,823 
Total deferred tax assets  222,823 
Valuation allowance  (222,823)
Deferred tax asset, net of allowance $- 

In assessing

Year Ended January 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating losses$216,642 $199,299 
Research & development credits34,406 25,725 
Deferred revenue18,124 10,691 
Accruals and reserves16,742 10,882 
Stock-based compensation11,706 2,445 
Operating lease liabilities6,589 7,490 
Capitalized research & development expense39,761 — 
Total deferred tax assets343,970 256,532 
Less: valuation allowance(328,786)(240,584)
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization(390)(177)
Operating lease right-of-use assets(5,723)(6,550)
Acquired intangible assets(22,058)(26,918)
Total deferred tax liabilities(28,171)(33,645)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$(12,987)$(17,697)
Beginning January 1, 2022, the realizationTax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act, eliminated the option to deduct research and development expenditures in the current year and requires taxpayers to capitalize such expenses pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 174. The capitalized expenses are amortized over a 5-year period for domestic expenses and a 15-year period for foreign expenses. As a result of this provision of the Tax Act, deferred tax assets management considersrelated to capitalized research expenses increased by $39.8 million.
The Company determines its valuation allowance on deferred tax assets by considering both positive and negative evidence in order to ascertain whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realizationRealization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income, duringif any, the periodstiming and amount of which are uncertain. Due to the Company’s historical operating losses in which temporary differences representingthe United States (“US”), the Company believes that it is more likely than not that the US deferred taxes will not be realized; accordingly, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance on its net future deductible amounts become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal ofUS deferred tax assets projected future taxable incomeas of January 31, 2023 and 2022. The valuation allowance increased by $88.2 million, $89.6 million, and $16.7 million during the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively, primarily driven by losses, capitalized research and development expenses, and tax planning strategiescredits generated in making this assessment. After considerationthe United States.
As of January 31, 2023, the Company had federal and California state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $793.1 million and $371.1 million, respectively, of which $604.3 million of the federal NOL carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely. The federal and California state net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2028 and 2029, respectively. In addition, the Company had NOLs for other states of $313.8 million, which expire beginning in the year 2023.
96

As of January 31, 2023, the Company had federal and California state research credit carryforwards of $33.1 million and $30.7 million, respectively. The federal credit carryforwards will begin to expire in 2038. The California research credit carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely.
Under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), the Company’s ability to utilize NOL carryforwards or other tax attributes such as research tax credits, in any taxable year may be limited if the Company experiences, or has experienced, an “ownership change.” A Section 382 ownership change generally occurs if one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders, who own at least 5% of the Company’s stock, increase their ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. The Company completed its Section 382 analysis and determined it had experienced ownership changes in some periods through January 31, 2021. As a result of the ownership changes, approximately $17.1 million of Federal NOLs, $17.9 million of California NOLs, and $4.7 million of federal tax credits are expected to expire unutilized for income tax purposes. Subsequent ownership changes may affect the limitation in future years.
The following table summarizes the activity related to unrecognized tax benefits as follows:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
Unrecognized tax benefits - beginning$19,238 $9,402 $10,153 
Gross changes - prior period tax position109 2,039 (3,620)
Gross changes - current period tax position6,415 7,797 2,869 
Unrecognized tax benefits — ending$25,762 $19,238 $9,402 
As of January 31, 2023, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of $25.8 million, which would not impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, due to the valuation allowance. The unrecognized tax benefits are related to activities which the Company believes qualify for research and development tax credits. The Company does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change over the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to the underpayment of income taxes as a component of income tax expense or benefit. To date, there have been no interest or penalties charged in relation to unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company is subject to income taxes in United States federal and various state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. The fiscal years from 2008 to 2023 remain open to examination due to the carryover of unused net operating losses or tax credits.
The Company intends to indefinitely reinvest the undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries in those operations. Therefore, the Company has not accrued any provision for taxes associated with the repatriation of undistributed earnings from its foreign subsidiaries as of January 31, 2023. The amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on these undistributed earnings was not material as of January 31, 2023.
15.     Geographic Information
Revenue by geographic area based on the shipping address of the customers was as follows:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands)
United States$373,736 $205,186 $131,571 
Rest of World94,358 35,820 14,919 
Total revenue$468,094 $241,006 $146,490 
Long-lived assets by geographic area were as follows:
January 31,
20232022
(in thousands)
United States$71,032 $72,026 
Netherlands76,747 87,731 
Rest of World7,182 7,580 
Total long-lived assets$154,961 $167,337 
97

16.    Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the years ended January 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Numerator:
Net income (loss)$(345,108)$(132,241)$(197,024)
Adjust: Accretion of beneficial conversion feature of redeemable convertible preferred stock— — (60,377)
Adjust: Cumulative dividends on redeemable convertible preferred stock— (4,292)(16,799)
Adjust: Deemed dividends attributable to vested option holders— (51,855)— 
Adjust: Deemed dividends attributable to common stock warrant holders— (110,635)— 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders - Basic$(345,108)$(299,023)$(274,200)
Less: Gain attributable to earnout shares issued— (84,420)— 
Less: Change in fair value of dilutive warrants— (68,223)— 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders - Diluted$(345,108)$(451,666)$(274,200)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding(1)
338,576,326297,642,99915,116,763
Less: Weighted-average unvested restricted shares and shares subject to repurchase(87,659)(221,030)— 
Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic338,488,667297,421,96915,116,763
Add: Earnout Shares under the treasury stock method— 3,701,427 — 
Add: Public and Private Placement Warrants under the treasury stock method— 1,366,870 — 
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted338,488,667302,490,26615,116,763
Net loss per share - Basic$(1.02)$(1.01)$(18.14)
Net loss per share - Diluted$(1.02)$(1.49)$(18.14)
_______________
(1) For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2022, as a result of the Merger, the Company retroactively adjusted the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding prior to the Closing Date by multiplying them by the Exchange Ratio of 0.9966 used to determine the number of shares of Common Stock into which they converted. The Common Stock issued as a result of the redeemable convertible preferred stock conversion on the Closing Date was included in the basic net loss per share calculation on a prospective basis.
Redeemable convertible preferred stock and preferred stock warrants outstanding prior to the Merger Closing Date were excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation for the year ended January 31, 2022, because including them would have had an antidilutive effect.
The potential shares of Common Stock that were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the periods presented because including them would have had an antidilutive effect were as follows:
Year Ended January 31,
202320222021
Redeemable convertible preferred stock (on an as-converted basis)— — 193,037,715 
2027 Convertible Notes (on an as-converted basis)12,483,569 — — 
Options to purchase common stock17,600,524 22,200,869 30,167,178 
Restricted stock units12,935,413 4,033,418 — 
Unvested early exercised common stock options40,555 132,180 371,193 
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants (on an as-converted basis)— — 2,358,546 
Common stock warrants34,499,436 35,549,024 36,402,515 
Employee stock purchase plan1,835,659 894,348  
Total potentially dilutive common share equivalents79,395,156 62,809,839 262,337,147 
PRSUs granted during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2023 were excluded from the above table because the respective stock price targets had not been met as of the year end.
98

17.    Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has a defined-contribution plan intended to qualify under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “401(k) Plan”). The Company contracted with a third-party provider to act as a custodian and trustee, and to process and maintain the records of participant data. Substantially all of the information available, management believes that significant uncertainty exists with respectexpenses incurred for administering the 401(k) Plan are paid by ChargePoint. The Company has not made any matching contributions to future realization ofdate.
18.     Subsequent Events
On March 6, 2023, the deferred tax assets and has therefore established a full valuation allowance. ForCompany paid $7.1 million to settle the year ended December 31, 2019, the valuation allowance was approximately $223,000.

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rateViriCiti Earnout liability pursuant to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:

For The Period From
May 10,
2019
(Inception) Through December 31,
2019
Statutory Federal income tax rate21.0%
Meals & entertainment0.0%
Change in Valuation Allowance18.3%
Income Taxes Provision (Benefit)39.3%

NOTE 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated subsequent eventsacquisition of ViriCiti on August 11, 2021. In accordance with the acquisition agreement, the Company was required to determine if events or transactions occurringpay additional earnout consideration on meeting certain revenue targets through the date the financial statements were available for issuance require potential adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements and has concluded that all such events that would require recognition or disclosure have been recognized or disclosed.

Management is currently evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the industry and has concluded that while it is reasonably possible that the virus could have a negative effect on the Company's financial position, results of its operations and/or search for a target company, the specific impact is not readily determinable as of the date of these financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

January 31, 2023.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements Withwith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures areinclude controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in ourthe reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to ChargePoint’s management, including ourits Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required by Rules 13a-15to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and 15d-15 underprocedures relative to their costs.

ChargePoint’s management, with the Exchange Act, ourparticipation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluationevaluated, as of January 31, 2023, the effectiveness of the design and operation of ourChargePoint’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019.(as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon thison that evaluation, ourthe Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that ourChargePoint’s disclosure controls and procedures (as definedwere not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of January 31, 2023 due to the material weaknesses in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective.

its internal control over financial reporting described below.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This

ChargePoint’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. ChargePoint’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect ChargePoint’s transactions and the dispositions of ChargePoint’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that ChargePoint’s transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and that ChargePoint’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations of management and the directors of ChargePoint; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of ChargePoint’s assets that could have a material effect on its financial statements.
ChargePoint’s management, under the supervision of and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of ChargePoint’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2023 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the assessment by ChargePoint’s management, ChargePoint’s management concluded that ChargePoint did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2023 due to the material weaknesses described below.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of ChargePoint’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
99

ChargePoint did not design and maintain effective controls over certain information technology (“IT”) general controls for information systems that are relevant to the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Specifically, ChargePoint did not design and maintain (a) program change management controls to ensure that IT program and data changes affecting financial IT applications and underlying accounting records are identified, tested, authorized and implemented appropriately, (b) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and that adequately restrict user and privileged access to its financial applications and data to appropriate company personnel and (c) testing and approval controls for program development to ensure that new software development is aligned with business and IT requirements. The IT deficiencies did not result in any misstatements to the consolidated financial statements, however, the deficiencies, when aggregated, could impact maintaining effective segregation of duties, as well as the effectiveness of IT-dependent controls (such as automated controls that address the risk of material misstatement to one or more assertions, along with the IT controls and underlying data that support the effectiveness of system-generated data and reports) that could result in misstatements potentially impacting all financial statement accounts and disclosures that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, ChargePoint management has determined these deficiencies in the aggregate constitute a material weakness.
ChargePoint did not design and maintain effective controls over segregation of duties.
The material weaknesses described above did not result in a misstatement to our annual or interim consolidated financial statements. However, each of these material weaknesses could result in a misstatement of our financial statement accounts or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
ChargePoint’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has audited the effectiveness of ChargePoint’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2023, as stated in their report, which appears in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Remediation Plan
ChargePoint has continued implementation of a plan to remediate these material weaknesses. These remediation measures are ongoing and include the following:
Engaging an external advisor to assist with evaluating and documenting the design and operating effectiveness of IT general controls and assist with the remediation of deficiencies, as necessary;
Designing and implementing controls over segregation of duties; and
Designing and implementing IT general controls, including controls over program change management, the provisioning and monitoring of user access rights and privileges and program development processes and procedures.
ChargePoint is working to remediate the material weaknesses as efficiently and effectively as possible and remediation efforts could continue beyond the fiscal year ending January 31, 2024. At this time, ChargePoint cannot provide an estimate of costs expected to be incurred in connection with implementing this remediation plan; however, these remediation measures will be time consuming, will result in it incurring significant costs, and will place significant demands on its financial and operational resources.
In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting, ChargePoint has expended, and will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.
Remediation of Previously Identified Material Weaknesses
As previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K doesfor the year ended January 31, 2022, management concluded the following material weaknesses existed in ChargePoint’s internal control over financial reporting:
ChargePoint did not includedesign and maintain an effective control environment commensurate with its financial reporting requirements. Specifically, ChargePoint did not maintain a reportsufficient complement of management’spersonnel with an appropriate degree of accounting knowledge, experience and training to appropriately analyze, record and disclose accounting matters commensurate with its accounting and reporting requirements.
ChargePoint did not design and maintain formal accounting policies, procedures and controls over significant accounts and disclosures to achieve complete, accurate and timely financial accounting, reporting and disclosures, including accounting for complex features associated with warrants, and adequate controls related to the preparation and review of journal entries.
ChargePoint did not design and maintain effective controls related to the valuation of acquired intangible assets, specifically controls over the review of the inputs and assumptions used in the valuation of the acquired assets.
100

ChargePoint completed the following actions and measures designed to remediate the control deficiencies that had led to the material weaknesses:
Hired additional finance and accounting personnel with the appropriate level of public accounting knowledge and experience to enhance ChargePoint’s accounting and financial reporting team and to establish and maintain internal control over financial reporting;
Engaged the internal audit team, along with third-party consultants, in assisting ChargePoint in evaluating internal control over financial reporting;
Designed and implemented additional review and training procedures within ChargePoint’s accounting and finance functions to enhance knowledge and understanding of internal control over financial reporting;
Performed a comprehensive assessment regardingof financial reporting risks relevant to ChargePoint’s consolidated financial statements, including identification of financially relevant systems and business processes at the financial statement assertion level, to facilitate the design and implementation or enhancement of existing controls to address the identified risks;
Redesigned and enhanced existing controls related to the identification of and accounting for certain non-routine, unusual or complex transactions, including the accounting for complex features associated with warrants;
Redesigned and enhanced existing controls related to the review of the inputs and assumptions used in the valuation of acquired intangible assets; and
Redesigned and enhanced controls over the preparation and review of journal entries, including controls over the segregation of duties of journal entries.
Management has completed its documentation, testing and evaluation of the newly designed and enhanced control activities and determined that, as of January 31, 2023, these control activities have been appropriately designed and implemented, and have operated effectively for a sufficient period of time to conclude that these previously identified material weaknesses have been remediated.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report ofduring the Company’s registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for newly public companies.

During the most recently completed fiscal quarter there has been no change in our internal control over financial reportingended January 31, 2023 that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, ourChargePoint’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.


Not applicable.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.
Not applicable.
101

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Our current

Information relating to directors, executive officers and directors are as follows:

NameAgePosition
Scott McNeill*48Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Jim Mutrie*47Chief Commercial Officer, General Counsel, Secretary and Director
Josh Rosinski*39Chief Operating Officer
Chris Carter41Director
Scott A. Gieselman56Director
Sam Stoutner33Director
Joseph Armes58Independent Director
Zane Arrott62Independent Director

*Denotes an executive officer.

Scott McNeillhas been our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and a member of our board of directors since May 2019. Mr. McNeill served as Chief Financial Officer of RSP from April 2013 through the completion of its acquisition by Concho in July 2018. Mr. McNeill also served as a member of the board of directors of RSP from December 2013 through July 2018. Before joining RSP, Mr. McNeill served as a managing director in the energy investment banking group of Raymond James Financial, Inc., advising companies operating in the exploration and production, midstream, and energy service and equipment segments of the energy industry. Mr. McNeill holds a B.B.A from Baylor University and an M.B.A from the University of Texas at Austin and is a certified public accountant in the State of Texas.

We believe Mr. McNeill’s extensive knowledge of the energy industry, as well as his substantial business, leadership and management experience, including serving as the chief financial officer and a member of the board of directors of a publicly traded company, brings important and valuable skills to our board of directors.

Jim Mutriehas been our Chief Commercial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary and a member of our board of directors since May 2019. Mr. Mutrie served as RSP’s Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from June 2014 through the completion of the acquisition of RSP by Concho in July 2018. While at RSP, Mr. Mutrie was a board member of the Texas Oil and Gas Association, the largest and oldest group in Texas representing petroleum interests. Prior to RSP, Mr. Mutrie served as General Counsel and Compliance Officer at United Surgical Partners International (NASDAQ: USPI). From October 2003 to January 2007, Mr. Mutrie practiced corporate law at Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., representing public and private companies in M&A transactions and capital market offerings, predominantly in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Mutrie holds a B.A. from Cornell University, a J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law, a Certificate in Financial Management from Cornell University and a Certificate in Financial Skills for The Energy Industry from SMU Cox School of Business, Executive Education.

We believe Mr. Mutrie’s extensive experience in managing public company M&A and financing transactions, as well as his extensive knowledge of the energy industry, brings important and valuable skills to our board of directors.

Josh Rosinskihas been our Chief Operating Officer since May 2019. Mr. Rosinski joined RSP in September 2014 and served as RSP’s Vice President of Reservoir Engineering from February 2017 through the completion of RSP’s acquisition by Concho in July 2018. Prior to RSP, Josh served as Vice President of Engineering at Simmons & Co. in the upstream advisory group where he directed engineering valuations supporting transactions across a variety of basins across the continental United States. Prior to Simmons & Co., Mr. Rosinski managed and implemented completion engineering operations in the East Texas Haynesville asset for Exco Resources. Mr. Rosinski began his career at Devon Energy in Houston and worked in multiple operational, reservoir, and corporate engineering functions throughout Texas and Louisiana assets. Mr. Rosinski graduated from Texas A&M with a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering.

53

Chris Carterhas been a member of our board of directors since May 2019. Mr. Carter joined NGP in 2004 and currently serves as Managing Partner and as a director of certain private NGP portfolio companies. Prior to joining NGP, Mr. Carter was an analyst with Deutsche Bank’s Energy Investment Banking group in Houston, where he focused on financing and merger and acquisition transactions in the oil and gas and oilfield services industries. Mr. Carter served on the Board of Directors of RSP Permian LLC from October 2010 until January 2014 and on the Board of Directors of Parsley Energy, Inc. from December 2013 until January 2016. Mr. Carter also served on the Board of Directors of Rice Energy, Inc. from October 2013 through November 2014. Mr. Carter received a B.B.A. and an M.P.A. in Accounting, summa cum laude, in 2002 from the University of Texas, where he was a member of the Business Honors Program. He received an M.B.A. in 2008 from Stanford University, where he graduated as an Arjay Miller Scholar.

We believe that Mr. Carter’s considerable experience with financing and merger and acquisition transactions in the energy industry, as well as his experience on the boards of several public and private energy companies, bring important and valuable skills to our board of directors.

Scott Gieselmanhas been a member of our board of directors since May 2019. Mr. Gieselman has served as a Partner for NGP since April 2007. Mr. Gieselman serves as a director of certain private NGP portfolio companies. Prior to joining NGP, Mr. Gieselman worked in various positions in the investment banking energy group of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, where he became a partner in 2002. He has served on the board of directors of HighPoint Resources Corporation since March 2018 and served on the board of directors of Chesapeake Energy Corporation from May 2019 until November 2019. Mr. Gieselman served on the board of directors of WildHorse Resource Development Corporation from September 2016 until it was acquired by Chesapeake Energy Corporation in February 2019. Mr. Gieselman also served as a member of the board of directors of Rice Energy, Inc. from January 2014 until April 2017 and was a member of the board of directors of Memorial Resource Development Corp. from its formation until it was acquired by Range Resources Corporation in September 2016. In addition, Mr. Gieselman served as a member of the board of directors of Memorial Production Partners GP LLC from December 2011 until March 2016. Mr. Gieselman received a B.S. in 1985 and an M.B.A. in 1988 from Boston College.

We believe that Mr. Gieselman’s considerable financial and energy investment banking experience, as well as his experience on the boards of several public and private energy companies, bring important and valuable skills to our board of directors.

Sam Stoutnerhas been a member of our board of directors since May 2019. Mr. Stoutner joined NGP in 2011 and currently serves as Principal and as a director of certain private NGP portfolio companies. Prior to joining NGP, Mr. Stoutner was an investment banking analyst with Madison Williams and Company’s Energy Investment Banking Group in Houston, where he focused on financing and merger and acquisition transactions in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Stoutner received a B.B.A. and M.P.A. in Accounting, summa cum laude, in 2010 from The University of Texas at Austin. He received an M.B.A. in 2016 from Stanford University.

We believe that Mr. Stoutner’s considerable experience with financing and merger and acquisition transactions in the energy industry, as well as his experience on the boards of several private energy companies, bring important and valuable skills to our board of directors.

Joseph Armeshas been a member of our board of directors since July 2019. Mr. Armes has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of CSW Industrials, Inc., a publicly traded industrial products company (“CSWI”), since September 2015, and as President of CSWI since February 2018. Prior to CSWI’s spin-off from Capital Southwest Corporation, a capital provider to middle market companies, in September 2015, Mr. Armes served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Capital Southwest Corporation from June 2013 to September 2015 and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Capital Southwest Corporation from January 2014 to August 2017. From December 2013 until the completion of the acquisition of RSP by Concho in July 2018, Mr. Armes served as a board member and as audit committee chairman for RSP. From 2005 to 2010, Mr. Armes served as the Chief Operating Officer of Hicks Holdings LLC, where he led the acquisition and disposition of a diverse portfolio of private equity investments. Prior to 2005, Mr. Armes served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of Hicks Sports Group, LLC, an owner and manager of various professional sports teams. Rangers Equity Holdings GP LLC, a subsidiary of Hicks Sports Group LLC, had an involuntary bankruptcy petition filed against it in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas on May 28, 2010. Mr. Armes has a B.B.A. and M.B.A. from Baylor University, and a J.D. from Southern Methodist University’s School of Law.

We believe that Mr. Armes’s broad executive and board leadership experience, compliance and governance expertise, and extensive corporate development experience, bring important and valuable skills to our board of directors.

Zane Arrotthas been a member of our board of directors since July 2019. Mr. Arrott served as Chief Operating Officer of RSP from its formation in 2013 until the completion of the acquisition of RSP by Concho in July 2018. Since 1995, Mr. Arrott has served as the Chief Operating Officer for Rising Star Energy Development Company, L.L.C. and continues to serve on the boards of Rising Star Energy Development Company, L.L.C. and Rising Star Petroleum, L.L.C. From 1982 to 1995, Mr. Arrott held several positions with Placid Oil Company and was elevated to General Manager of its Canadian Division in 1988. He has a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University.

We believe that Mr. Arrott’s extensive experience with reservoir engineering, production engineering, project economic forecasting and reserve acquisitions brings important and valuable skills to our board of directors.


Number and Terms of Office of Officers and Directors

We have seven directors. Our board of directors is divided into three classes, with only one class of directors being elected in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual meeting of stockholders) serving a three-year term. The term of office of the first class of directors, consisting of Scott McNeill, Scott Gieselman and Joseph Armes, will expire at our first annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of Sam Stoutner and Zane Arrott, will expire at the second annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting of Jim Mutrie and Chris Carter, will expire at the third annual meeting of stockholders. We may not hold an annual meeting of stockholders until after we consummate our initial business combination.

Holders of our Founder Shares will have the right to elect all of our directors prior to consummation of our initial business combination and holders of our public shares will not have the right to vote on the election of directors during such time. These provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may only be amended if approved by a majority of at least 90% of our common stock voting at a stockholder meeting.

Approval of our initial business combination will require the affirmative vote of a majority of our board of directors, which must include a majority of our independent directors and each of the non-independent directors nominated by our sponsor.

Our officers are appointed by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors, rather than for specific terms of office. Our board of directors is authorized to appoint persons to the offices set forth in our bylaws as it deems appropriate. Our bylaws provide that our officers may consist of a Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Vice Presidents, Secretary and such other offices as may be determined by the board of directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has three standing committees: an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. Subject to phase-in rules and a limited exception, the rules of the NYSE and Rule 10A of the Exchange Act require that the audit committee of a listed company be comprised solely of independent directors. Subject to phase-in rules and a limited exception, the rules of the NYSE require that the compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees of a listed company be comprised solely of independent directors. The charter of each committee is available on our website.

Audit Committee

Our board of directors has established an audit committee of the board of directors. Joseph Armes, Zane Arrott and Scott Gieselman serve as members of our audit committee. Under the NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules, we are required to have at least three members of the audit committee, all of whom must be independent, subject to the exception described below. Joseph Armes and Zane Arrott are independent. Because our securities are listed on the NYSE, we have one year from the effective date of the Registration Statement to have our audit committee be comprised solely of independent members. We intend to identify one additional independent director to serve on the audit committee within one year of the effective date of the Registration Statement, at which time Mr. Gieselman will resign from the committee. We expect such additional director to enter into a letter agreement substantially similar to the letter agreement signed by our Sponsor, officer and directors included as an exhibit to the Registration Statement.

Joseph Armes serves as chair of the audit committee. Each member of the audit committee is financially literate and our board of directors has determined that Joseph Armes qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules.


We have adopted an audit committee charter, which details the principal functions of the audit committee, including:

the appointment, compensation, retention, replacement, and oversight of the work of the independent auditors and any other independent registered public accounting firm engaged by us;

pre-approving all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors or any other registered public accounting firm engaged by us, and establishing pre-approval policies and procedures;

reviewing and discussing with the independent auditors all relationships the auditors have with us in order to evaluate their continued independence;

setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditors;

setting clear policies for audit partner rotation in compliance with applicable laws and regulations;

obtaining and reviewing a report, at least annually, from the independent auditors describing (i) the independent auditor’s internal quality-control procedures and (ii) any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the audit firm, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm and any steps taken to deal with such issues;

reviewing and approving any related party transaction required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC prior to us entering into such transaction; and

reviewing with management, the independent auditors, and our legal advisors, as appropriate, any legal, regulatory or compliance matters, including any correspondence with regulators or government agencies and any employee complaints or published reports that raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies and any significant changes in accounting standards or rules promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

Compensation Committee

Our board of directors has established a compensation committee of the board of directors. Joseph Armes and Zane Arrott serve as members of our compensation committee. Under the NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules, we are required to have at least two members of the compensation committee, all of whom must be independent. Joseph Armes and Zane Arrott are independent. Zane Arrott serves as chair of the compensation committee.

We have adopted a compensation committee charter, which details the principal functions of the compensation committee, including:

reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate goals and objectives relevant to our chief executive officer’s compensation, evaluating our chief executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining and approving the remuneration (if any) of our chief executive officer based on such evaluation;

reviewing and approving on an annual basis the compensation of all of our other officers;

reviewing on an annual basis our executive compensation policies and plans;

implementing and administering our incentive compensation equity-based remuneration plans;


assisting management in complying with our proxy statement and annual report disclosure requirements;

approving all special perquisites, special cash payments and other special compensation and benefit arrangements for our officers and employees;

if required, producing a report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement; and

reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes, if appropriate, to the remuneration for directors.

The charter also provides that the compensation committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser and will be directly responsiblepresented in the definitive proxy statement filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the appointment, compensation and oversight2023 Annual Meeting of the work of any such adviser. However, before engaging or receiving advice from a compensation consultant, external legal counsel or any other adviser, the compensation committee will consider the independence of each such adviser, including the factors required by the NYSE and the SEC.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our board of directors has established a nominating and corporate governance committee of the board of directors. The members of our nominating and corporate governance committee are Joseph Armes and Zane Arrott. Joseph Armes serves as chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

The primary purposes of our nominating and corporate governance committee are to assist the board in:

identifying, screening and reviewing individuals qualified to serve as directors and recommending to the board of directors candidates for nomination for election at the annual meeting of stockholders or to fill vacancies on the board of directors;

developing, recommending to the board of directors and overseeing implementation of our corporate governance guidelines;

coordinating and overseeing the annual self-evaluation of the board of directors, its committees, individual directors and management in the governance of the company; and

reviewing on a regular basis our overall corporate governance and recommending improvements as and when necessary.

The nominating and corporate governance committee is governed by a charter that complies with the rules of the NYSE.

Director Nominations

Our nominating and corporate governance committee will recommend to the board of directors candidates for nomination for election at the annual meeting of the stockholders. The board of directors will also consider director candidates recommended for nomination by our stockholders during such times as they are seeking proposed nominees to stand for election at the next annual meeting of stockholders (or, if applicable, a special meeting of stockholders). Our stockholders that wish to nominate a director for election to our board of directors should follow the procedures set forth in our bylaws.

We have not formally established any specific, minimum qualifications that must be met or skills that are necessary for directors to possess. In general, in identifying and evaluating nominees for director, our board of directors considers educational background, diversity of professional experience, knowledge of our business, integrity, professional reputation, independence, wisdom, and the ability to represent the best interests of our stockholders. Prior to our initial business combination, holders of our public shares will not have the right to recommend director candidates for nomination to our board of directors.


Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of any class of equity security which is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based solely upon a review of such forms, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2019, there were no delinquent filers, except that one report, covering a single transaction that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2019, was filed late by each of our Sponsor, Scott McNeill, Jim Mutrie, Chris Carter, Scott Gieselman and Sam Stoutner.

Code of Ethics and Committee Charters

We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees. You review this document on our website. In addition, a copy of the Code of Ethics will be provided without charge upon request from us. We intend to disclose any amendments to or waivers of certain provisions of our Code of Ethics in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Conflicts of Interest

NGP manages several investment vehicles. NGP Funds and other NGP affiliates and portfolio companies may compete with us for acquisition opportunities. If these entities or companies decide to pursue any such opportunity, we may be precluded from procuring such opportunities. In addition, investment ideas generated within NGP may be suitable for both us and for a current or future NGP Fund or other portfolio company and may be directed to such investment vehicle rather than to us. Neither NGP nor members of our board of directors who are also employed by NGP have any obligation to present us with any opportunity for a potential business combination of which they become aware. NGP and/or our management, in their capacities as psrtners, officers or managing directors of NGP or in their other endeavors, may be required to present potential business combinations to the related entities described above, current or future NGP Funds or portfolio companies, or third parties, before they present such opportunities to us.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may pursue an Affiliated Joint Acquisition opportunity with any such fund or other portfolio company or investment vehicle. Such entity may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such entity a class of equity or equity-linked securities. Certain of our directors presently have, and any of our officers and directors in the future may have, additional fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a business combination opportunity to such entity. Accordingly, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity that is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such opportunity to such other entity. We do not believe, however, that the fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of our officers or directors will materially affect our ability to complete our business combination. In addition, we may pursue an Affiliated Joint Acquisition opportunity with an entity to which an officer or director has a fiduciary or contractual obligation. Any such entity may co-invest with us in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such entity a class of equity or equity-linked securities. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that we renounce our interest in any corporate opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the Company and such opportunity is one we are legally and contractually permitted to undertake and would otherwise be reasonable for us to pursue.


Our Sponsor, officers and directors may become involved with subsequent blank check companies similar to the Company, although they have agreed, pursuant to a written letter agreement, not to participate in the formation of, or become an officer or director of, any other blank check company until we have entered into a definitive agreement regarding our initial business combination or we have failed to complete our initial business combination within 24 months after the closing of our Public Offering. Investors and potential investors should also be aware of the following other potential conflicts of interest:

None of our officers or directors is required to commit his or her full time to our affairs and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in allocating his or her time among various business activities.

In the course of their other business activities, our officers and directors may become aware of investment and business opportunities which may be appropriate for presentation to us as well as the other entities with which they are then affiliated. Our management may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.

Our initial stockholders have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares and any public shares held by them in connection with the consummation of our initial business combination. Additionally, our initial stockholders have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares held by them if we fail to consummate our initial business combination within 24 months after the closing of our Public Offering. If we do not complete our initial business combination within such applicable time period, the proceeds of the sale of the Private Placement Warrants held in the Trust Account will be used to fund the redemption of our public shares, and the Private Placement Warrants will expire worthless. Furthermore, our initial stockholders have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any Founder Shares held by them until one year after the date of the consummation of our initial business combination or earlier if, subsequent to our initial business combination, (i) the last sale price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after our initial business combination or (ii) we consummate a subsequent liquidation, merger, stock exchange or other similar transaction which results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property. With certain limited exceptions, the Private Placement Warrants and the Class A common stock underlying such warrants will not be transferable, assignable or saleable until 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination. Since our Sponsor and officers and directors directly or indirectly own common stock and warrants, our officers and directors may have a conflict of interest in determining whether a particular target business is an appropriate business with which to effectuate our initial business combination.

Our officers and directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a particular business combination if the retention or resignation of any such officers and directors was included by a target business as a condition to any agreement with respect to our initial business combination.

Our Sponsor, officers or directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a business combination and financing arrangements as we may obtain loans from our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor or any of our officers or directors to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants at a price of $1.50 per warrant at the option of the lender. Such warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants, including as to exercise price, exercisability and exercise period.

The conflicts described above may not be resolved in our favor.

In general, officers and directors of a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware are required to present business opportunities to a corporation if:

the corporation could financially undertake the opportunity;

the opportunity is within the corporation’s line of business; and

it would not be fair to the Company and its stockholders for the opportunity not to be brought to the attention of the corporation.

Accordingly, as a result of multiple business affiliations, our officers and directors may have similar legal obligations relating to presenting business opportunities meeting the above-listed criteria to multiple entities. Furthermore, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the doctrine of corporate opportunity will not apply with respect to any of our officers or directors in circumstances where the application of the doctrine would conflict with any fiduciary duties or contractual obligations they may have.

We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our Sponsor, officers or directors or making the acquisition through a joint venture or other form of shared ownership with our Sponsor, officers or directors. In the event we seek to complete our initial business combination with a business combination target that is affiliated with our Sponsor, officers or directors, we, or a committee of independent directors, would obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA or from an independent accounting firm that such initial business combination is fair to the Company from a financial point of view. We are not required to obtain such an opinion in any other context. Furthermore, in no event will our Sponsor or any of our existing officers or directors, or any of their respective affiliates, be paid by the Company any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the completion of our initial business combination. Further, we pay an amount equal to $10,000 per month to our Sponsor for office space, utilities, secretarial support and administrative services provided to us.

We cannot assure you that any of the above mentioned conflicts will be resolved in our favor.

In the event that we submit our initial business combination to our public stockholders for a vote, we will complete our initial business combination only if a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock voted are voted in favor of the initial business combination. Our initial stockholders have agreed to vote any Founder Shares and public shares held by them in favor of our initial business combination, and our officers and directors have also agreed to vote any public shares held by them in favor of our initial business combination.


Limitation on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that our officers and directors will be indemnified by us to the fullest extent authorized by Delaware law, as it now exists or may in the future be amended. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that our directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages to us or our stockholders for breaches of their fiduciary duty as directors, unless they violated their duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders, acted in bad faith, knowingly or intentionally violated the law, authorized unlawful payments of dividends, unlawful stock purchases or unlawful redemptions, or derived an improper personal benefit from their actions as directors.

We have entered into agreements with our officers and directors to provide contractual indemnification in addition to the indemnification provided for in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Our bylaws also permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director or employee for any liability arising out of his or her actions, regardless of whether Delaware law would permit such indemnification.

Our officers and directors have agreed to waive any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the Trust Account. Accordingly, any indemnification provided will only be ableStockholders to be satisfiedheld on or about July 18, 2023, which information is incorporated herein by us if (i) we have sufficient funds outside of the Trust Account or (ii) we consummate an initial business combination.

Our indemnification obligations may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our officers and directors, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders. Furthermore, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

We believe that these provisions, the insurance and the indemnity agreements are necessary to attract and retain talented and experienced officers and directors.

reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

None of our officers or directors have received any cash compensation for services rendered

Information relating to us. Commencing on the date that our securities were first listed on the NYSE through the earlier of consummation of our initial business combination and our liquidation, we have agreed to pay our Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space, utilities, secretarial support and administrative services. In addition, our Sponsor, executive officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Other than these payments and reimbursements, no compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid by the Company to our Sponsor, officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, prior to completion of our initial business combination.

After the completion of our initial business combination, directors or members of our management team who remain with us may be paid consulting or management fees from the combined company. All of these fees will be fully disclosed to stockholders, to the extent then known, in the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials (as applicable) furnished to our stockholders in connection with a proposed business combination. We have not established any limit on the amount of such fees that may be paid by the combined company to our directors or members of management. It is unlikely the amount of such compensation will be known atpresented in the timedefinitive proxy statement filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the 2023 Annual Meeting of the proposed business combination, because the directors of the post-combination business will be responsible for determining officer and director compensation. Any compensationStockholders to be paid to our officers will be determined,held on or recommended to the board of directors for determination, eitherabout July 18, 2023, which information is incorporated herein by a compensation committee constituted solely of independent directors or by a majority of the independent directors on our board of directors.

reference
.

We do not intend to take any action to ensure that members of our management team maintain their positions with us after the consummation of our initial business combination, although it is possible that some or all of our officers and directors may negotiate employment or consulting arrangements to remain with us after our initial business combination. The existence or terms of any such employment or consulting arrangements to retain their positions with us may influence our management’s motivation in identifying or selecting a target business, but we do not believe that the ability of our management to remain with us after the consummation of our initial business combination will be a determining factor in our decision to proceed with any potential business combination. We are not party to any agreements with our officers and directors that provide for benefits upon termination of employment.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth

Information relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans and other information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 27, 2020 by:

each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;

each of our named executive officers and directors that beneficially owns shares of our common stock; and

all our executive officers and directors as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons namedrequired to be provided in response to this item will be presented in the table have sole votingdefinitive proxy statement filed in pursuant to Regulation 14A for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about July 18, 2023, which information is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, descriptions of ChargePoint’s equity compensation plans are set forth in Note 13, Equity Plans and investment power with respectStock-Based Compensation, in the notes to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them. The following table does not reflect record or beneficial ownership of the Warrants or the Private Placement Warrants.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) Number of Shares Beneficially Owned  Approximate Percentage of Outstanding Common Stock 
NGP Switchback, LLC (our Sponsor)(2)(3)  7,772,941   19.8%
Scott McNeill(3)  7,875,941   20.1%
Jim Mutrie(3)  7,815,941   19.9%
Josh Rosinski  5,000   * 
Chris Carter(4)  7,772,941   19.8%
Scott Gieselman(4)  7,772,941   19.8%
Sam Stoutner(4)  7,772,941   19.8%
Joseph Armes  65,000   * 
Zane Arrott  64,000   * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 individuals)  7,972,941   20.3%
Adage Capital Partners, L.P.(5)  2,400,000   6.1%
Glazer Capital, LLC(6)  2,183,017   5.6%
Davidson Kempner Partners(7)  2,000,000   5.1%
HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC(8)  2,000,000   5.1%

*Less than one percent.

(1)This table is based on 39,264,704 shares of common stock outstanding at March 27, 2020, of which 31,411,763 were shares of Class A common stock and 7,852,941 were shares of Class B common stock. Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the entities, directors and executive officers in this table is 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1010, Dallas, TX 75225.
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

(2)Interests shown consist solely of Founder Shares, classified as shares of Class B common stock. Such shares will automatically convert into shares of Class A common stock at the time of our initial business combination on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment.

(3)NGP Switchback, LLC is the record holder of the shares reported herein. Mr. McNeill is a manager and the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NGP Switchback, LLC. Mr. Mutrie is a manager and the Chief Commercial Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of NGP Switchback, LLC. As such, Messrs. McNeill and Mutrie may be deemed to have or share beneficial ownership of the common stock held directly by NGP Switchback, LLC. Messrs. McNeill and Mutrie disclaim any such beneficial ownership of such securities. On July 30, 2019, Messrs McNeill and Mutrie purchased, for $10.00 per Unit, 103,000 Units and 43,000 Units, respectively, directly from the underwriters in connection with our Public Offering. Each Unit consists of one share of our Class A common stock and one-third of one Warrant. In addition, NGP XII US Holdings, L.P. directly owns a majority of the limited liability company interests of NGP Switchback, LLC. NGP XII Holdings GP, L.L.C. is the sole general partner of NGP XII US Holdings, L.P., and NGP Natural Resources XII, L.P. is the sole member of NGP XII Holdings GP, L.L.C. G.F.W. Energy XII, L.P. is the sole general partner of NGP Natural Resources XII, L.P., and GFW XII, L.L.C. is the sole general partner of G.F.W. Energy XII, L.P. GFW XII, L.L.C. has delegated full power and authority to manage NGP XII US Holdings, L.P. to NGP Energy Capital Management, L.L.C. Chris Carter, Tony R. Weber, Craig Glick and Jill Lampert serve on the Executive Committee of NGP Energy Capital Management, L.L.C. Accordingly, each of NGP XII US Holdings, L.P., NGP XII Holdings GP, L.L.C., NGP Natural Resources XII, L.P., G.F.W. Energy XII, L.P., GFW XII, L.L.C., NGP Energy Capital Management, L.L.C., Tony R. Weber, Chris Carter, Craig Glick and Jill Lampert may be deemed to have or share beneficial ownership of the common stock held directly by NGP Switchback, LLC.
(4)NGP Switchback, LLC is the record holder of the shares reported herein. Messrs. Carter, Gieselman and Stoutner are managers of NGP Switchback, LLC. As such, Messrs. Carter, Gieselman and Stoutner may be deemed to have or share beneficial ownership of the common stock held directly by NGP Switchback, LLC. Messrs. Carter, Gieselman and Stoutner disclaim any such beneficial ownership of such securities.
(5)According to a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on August 5, 2019 on behalf of Adage Capital Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“ACP”), Adage Capital Partners GP, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“ACPGP”), Adage Capital Advisors, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“ACA”), Robert Atchinson and Phillip Gross, the shares reported herein are directly owned by ACP. ACPGP is the general partner of ACP, ACA is the managing member of ACPGP, and Messrs. Atchinson and Gross are managing members of ACA. ACP has the power to dispose of and the power to vote the shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by it, which power may be exercised by its general partner, ACPGP. ACA, as managing member of ACPGP, directs ACPGP’s operations. Messrs. Atchinson and Gross, as managing members of ACA, have shared power to vote the shares of Class A common stock beneficially owned by ACP. The business address of this stockholder is 200 Clarendon Street, 52nd Floor, Boston, MA 02116.
(6)According to a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020 by Glazer Capital, LLC, Glazer Capital, LLC serves as investment manager for certain funds and managed accounts that hold the shares reported herein. Paul J. Glazer serves as the managing member of Glazer Capital, LLC. The business address of this stockholder is 250 West 55th Street, Suite 30A, New York, NY 10019.
(7)According to a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on August 5, 2019 on behalf of Davidson Kempner Partners (“DKP”), Davidson Kempner Institutional Partners, L.P. (“DKIP”), Davidson Kempner International, Ltd. (“DKIL”), Davidson Kempner Capital Management LP (“DKCM”), Thomas L. Kempner, Jr. and Anthony A. Yoseloff,, DKCM acts as investment manager to each of DKP, DKIP and DKIL. Messrs. Kempner and Yoseloff, through DKCM, are responsible for the voting and investment decisions relating to the securities held by DKP, DKIP and DKIL reported herein. The business address of this stockholder is 520 Madison Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10022.
(8)According to a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020 by HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, the shares reported herein are included in units held by HITE Hedge LP, HITE MLP LP, HITE Hedge QP LP, HITE MLP Advantage LP, HITE Energy LP, and HITE Hedge Offshore Ltd., for all of which HITE Hedge Asset Management LLC is the investment adviser. The business address of this stockholder is 300 Crown Colony Drive, Suite 108, Quincy, MA 02169.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Founder Shares

On May 16, 2019, we issued an aggregate of 8,625,000 Founder Shares

Information required to our Sponsor for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000be provided in cash, or approximately $0.003 per share. In July 2019, our Sponsor transferred 40,000 Founder Sharesresponse to each of our independent director nominees at their original purchase price. In September 2019, our Sponsor forfeited an aggregate of 772,059 Founder Shares.

Private Placement Warrants

Our Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 5,521,568 Private Placement Warrants for a purchase price of $1.50 per warrant in private placements that occurred simultaneously with the closing of our Public Offering and the sale of the Overallotment Units. As such, our Sponsor’s interest in this transaction is valued at approximately $8.3 million. Each Private Placement Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our Class A common stock at $11.50 per share. The Private Placement Warrants (including the Class A common stock issuable upon exercise thereof) may not, subject to certain limited exceptions,item will be transferred, assigned or sold by the holder until 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination.

Conflicts of Interest

As more fully discussed in “Part III, Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance — Conflicts of Interest,” if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity that falls within the line of business of any entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such business combination opportunity to such entity. Our officers and directors currently have certain relevant fiduciary duties or contractual obligations that may take priority over their duties to us. We may pursue an Affiliated Joint Acquisition opportunity with an entity to which an officer or director has a fiduciary or contractual obligation. Any such entity may co-invest with uspresented in the target business at the time of our initial business combination, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the acquisition by issuing to such entity a class of equity or equity-linked securities.

Administrative Services Agreement

On July 25, 2019, we entered into an administrative services agreementdefinitive proxy statement filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about July 18, 2023, which have agreed to pay our Sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space, utilities, secretarial support and administrative services. Upon completion of our initial business combination or our liquidation, we will cease paying these monthly fees.

Other than these monthly fees, no compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paidinformation is incorporated herein by the Company to our Sponsor, officers and directors, or any of their respective affiliates, for services rendered prior to or in connection with the completion of an initial business combination. However, these individuals will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. There is no cap or ceiling on the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred by such persons in connection with activities on our behalf.

After our initial business combination, members of our management team who remain with us may be paid consulting, management or other fees from the combined company with any and all amounts being fully disclosed to our stockholders, to the extent then known, in the tender offer or proxy solicitation materials (as applicable) furnished to our stockholders. It is unlikely that the amount of such compensation will be known at the time of distribution of such tender offer materials or at the time of a stockholder meeting held to consider our initial business combination, as applicable, as it will be up to the directors of the post-combination business to determine executive and director compensation.

Related Party Loans and Advances

Until the consummation of our Public Offering, our only source of liquidity was an initial sale of Founder Shares to our Sponsor, and the proceeds of loans and advances from our Sponsor in the amount of $251,000. In August 2019, the Company repaid the Sponsor $251,000 in settlement of the outstanding loan and advances.

reference.

In addition, in order to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination, our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor or certain of our officers and directors may, but are not obligated to, loan us funds as may be required. If we complete an initial business combination, we would repay such loaned amounts. In the event that our initial business combination does not close, we may use a portion of the working capital held outside the Trust Account to repay such loaned amounts, but no proceeds from the Trust Account would be used for such repayment. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants at a price of $1.50 per warrant at the option of the lender. The warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants, including as to exercise price, exercisability and exercise period. Except as set forth above, the terms of such loans by our officers and directors, if any, have not been determined, and no written agreements exist with respect to such loans. Prior to the completion of our initial business combination, we do not expect to seek loans from parties other than our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor as we do not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds and provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our Trust Account.

Registration Rights

The holders of the Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans (and any shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans and upon conversion of the Founder Shares) will be entitled to registration rights pursuant to a registration rights agreement, dated July 25, 2019, requiring us to register such securities for resale (in the case of the Founder Shares, only after conversion to our Class A common stock). The holders of at least $25 million in value of these securities are entitled to demand that we file a registration statement covering such securities and to require us to effect up to an aggregate of three underwritten offerings of such securities. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to our completion of our initial business combination. However, the registration rights agreement provides that we will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lock-up period, which occurs (a) in the case of the Founder Shares, on the earlier of (A) one year after the completion of our initial business combination or (B) subsequent to our business combination, (i) if the last sale price of our Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after our initial business combination or (ii) the date on which we complete a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange, reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property and (b) in the case of the Private Placement Warrants and the respective Class A common stock underlying such warrants, 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.


Director Independence

An “independent director” is defined generally as a person who has no material relationship with the listed company (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company). Our board of directors has determined that Joseph Armes and Zane Arrott are “independent directors” as defined in the NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules. Our independent directors will have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Fees for professional services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm since inception include:

 For the period from
May 10,
2019 (inception) through December 31,
2019
 
Audit Fees(1)$74,675 
Audit-Related Fees(2) - 
Tax Fees(3) - 
All Other Fees(4) - 
    
Total$74,675 

(1)Audit Fees. Audit fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided by our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include attest services that are not
Information required by statute or regulation and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

(3)Tax Fees. Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

(4)All Other Fees. All other fees consist of fees billed for all other services.

Policy on Board Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of the Independent Auditors

The audit committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of this responsibility, the audit committee shall review and, in its sole discretion, pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services to be provided in response to this item will be presented in the definitive proxy statement filed pursuant to Regulation 14A for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about July 18, 2023, which information is incorporated herein by our independent registered public accounting firm as provided under the audit committee charter.

66

reference.

102


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

Financial Statements: See “Index to Financial Statements” at “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” herein.

(b) Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Exhibits.
Exhibit No.Description
Exhibit No.Description
3.1
2.1
3.23.1
3.2
3.3
4.1
4.2
4.3+
4.4
4.5
4.110.1
4.2Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-232501) filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019)
4.3Specimen Warrant Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-232501) filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019)
4.4Warrant Agreement, dated July 25, 2019, between Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’sCorporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-39004), filed with the SEC on July 30, 2019).
10.2
10.3
10.4^*
10.5*
10.6
4.510.7*
10.110.8*
10.9
103

Exhibit No.Description
10.10*
10.11*
10.12
10.210.13
10.14^*
10.15^*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19*
10.20*
10.21*
10.22^*
10.23^*
10.24^*
10.25
10.310.26^*


10.4Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 25, 2019, between Switchback Energy Acquisition Corporation and NGP Switchback, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-39004) filed with the SEC on July 30, 2019)
10.5Promissory Note, dated May 16, 2019, issued to NGP Switchback, LLCOctober 24, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration StatementChargePoint Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form S-110-Q (File No. 333-232501)0001-39004), filed with the SEC on July 1, 2019)December 8, 2022).
10.710.27^*+
10.810.28*+
10.921.1+
104

24Exhibit No.Description
23.1+
24.1+
31.131.1+
31.2+
32.132.1***
32.2***
101.INS101.INS+Inline XBRL Instance Document (the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because iXBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).
101.SCH101.SCH+Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL101.CAL+Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF101.DEF+Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB101.LAB+Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension LabelLabels Linkbase Document
101.PRE101.PRE+Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104+The Cover Page Interactive Data File, formatted in Inline XBRL (included within the Exhibit 101 attachments).
^The schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule and/or exhibit will be furnished to the SEC upon request.
*Denotes management compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
+Filed herewith
***Furnished herewith

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
105

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrantRegistrant has duly caused this reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SWITCHBACK ENERGY ACQUISITION CORPORATION
April 3, 2023
Date: March 30, 2020
CHARGEPOINT HOLDINGS, INC.
By:/s/ Scott McNeillRex S. Jackson
Name:Scott McNeillRex S. Jackson
Title:

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer) 

Financial Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Scott McNeillPasquale Romano and Jim MutrieRex S. Jackson, jointly and each or any one of them,severally, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent,attorneys-in-fact, each with fullthe power of substitution, and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or her substitutes, or substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrantRegistrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated on the dates indicated.

NameTitleDate
SignatureTitleSignature Date
/s/ Scott McNeillRex S. JacksonChief Financial OfficerApril 3, 2023
REX S. JACKSON(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Henrik GerdesChief Accounting OfficerApril 3, 2023
HENRIK GERDES(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ Pasquale RomanoChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer and DirectorMarch 30, 2020April 3, 2023
Scott McNeillPASQUALE ROMANO(Principal Executive Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Chris CarterRoxanne BowmanDirectorMarch 30, 2020April 3, 2023
Chris CarterROXANNE BOWMAN
/s/ Scott GieselmanElaine L. ChaoDirectorMarch 30, 2020April 3, 2023
Scott GieselmanELAINE L. CHAO
/s/ Jim MutrieBruce ChizenDirectorMarch 30, 2020April 3, 2023
Jim MutrieBRUCE CHIZEN
/s/ Sam StoutnerAxel HarriesDirectorMarch 30, 2020April 3, 2023
Sam StoutnerAXEL HARRIES
/s/ Joseph ArmesJeffrey HarrisDirectorMarch 30, 2020April 3, 2023
Joseph ArmesJEFFREY HARRIS
/s/ Zane ArrottSusan HeysteeDirectorMarch 30, 2020April 3, 2023
Zane ArrottSUSAN HEYSTEE

69

106


SignatureTitleSignature Date
/s/ Mark LeschlyDirectorApril 3, 2023
MARK LESCHLY
/s/ Michael LinseDirectorApril 3, 2023
MICHAEL LINSE
/s/ Ekta Singh-BushellDirectorApril 3, 2023
EKTA SINGH-BUSHELL
/s/ G. Richard Wagoner, Jr.DirectorApril 3, 2023
G. RICHARD WAGONER, JR.
107