UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192021

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number 001-14015

Applied Energetics, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware

 

77-0262908

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)
 (IRS Employer

Identification Number)

2480 W Ruthrauff9070 S. Rita Road, Suite 140 Q1500  
Tucson, Arizona 8570585747
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code(520) 628-7415

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (520) 628-7415

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

 

Title of Each Class Trading Symbol Name of Each Exchange on
Which
Registered
Common Stock, $.001 par value AERG OTCQB

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

None

None

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large Accelerated Filer ☐Accelerated Filer ☐
Non-Accelerated Filer ☐Smaller reporting company ☒
Emerging growth company ☐

Large Accelerated Filer ☐ Accelerated Filer ☐ Non-Accelerated Filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒ Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has fi led a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting fi rm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the last reported sales price at which the stock was sold on June 30, 20192021 (the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) was approximately $25,393,000.$81,178,513.

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.001 par value, as of March 26, 202018, 2022 was 210,304,062.207,692,878.

 

 

 

 

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20192020

INDEX

 

Page No.
PART I.
Item 1.Business21
Item 1A.Risk Factors57
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments1012
Item 2.Properties1112
Item 3.Legal Proceedings1112
Item 4.PART II.Mine Safety Disclosures13
PART II.
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and IssuerPurchases of Equity Securities1413
Item 6.[Reserved]13
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations1513
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk20
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data20
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure20
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures20
Item 9B.Other Information21
Item 9C.

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

21
PART III.
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance22
Item 11.Executive Compensation2425
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related StockholderMatters2628
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence2729
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services2730
PART IV.
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules2831
Signatures:2932

 

i

 

 

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

 

Certain statements in this Form 10-K constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts and can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may”, “believe”, “will”, “expect”, “project”, “anticipate”, “estimates”, “plans”, “strategy”, “target”,“may,” “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “anticipate,” “estimates,” “plans,” “strategy,” “target,” “prospects” or “continue”, and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations of our management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect our current plans and expectations, as well as future results of operations and financial condition and may cause our actual results, performances or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. This Form 10-K contains important information as to risk factors under Item 1A. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. We do not assume any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

 

Available Information

 

Applied Energetics, Inc. (“company,” “Applied Energetics,” “AERG,” “we,” “our” or “us”). makes available free of charge on its website at www.aergs.com its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practical after electronically filing or furnishing such material to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

 

This report may be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549 or at www.sec.gov. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

 

General

 

Applied Energetics, 2019 General Corporate Review:

Applied Energetics,Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our executive office isheadquarters are located at 2480 W Ruthrauff9070 S. Rita Road, Suite 140 Q,1500, Tucson, Arizona, 85705; phone85747 and our telephone number is (520) 628-7415. Our web address is www.aergs.com.

 

Applied Energetics specializes in the development and manufacture of advanced high-performance lasers, high voltage electronics, advanced optical systems, and integrated guided energy systems for defense, aerospace, national security, industrial, biomedical, and scientific customersmarkets worldwide.

 

Technology, Capabilities and Patents

Applied Energetics, Inc. is recognized as a global leader in developing the next generation optical sources exhibiting ever-increasing output energy, peak power and frequency agility while also providing decreased size, weight, and cost of these systems for customers. Applied Energetics utilizes patented, dual-use technologies to advance critical industries. Leveraging our proprietary fiber-based architecture and wavelength-and pulse-agility capability, our Ultrashort Pulse (“USP™”) technology can enable users to achieve specific effects across different use cases with an unmatched blend of size, weight and power attributes. While initially designed to meet the emerging needs and priorities for the national security community, our directed energy technology also has commercial applications in both the biomedical and advanced manufacturing industries.


The AERG scientific team is continuously innovating and expanding our patent portfolio to cover these technological breakthroughs and further enhance our suite of solutions for threat disruption for the Department of Defense, the intelligence community, and for commercial, medical and space applications with optical sources operating from the deep ultraviolet to the far infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum.

AERG has developed, successfully demonstrated and holds all crucial intellectual property rights to a dynamic Directed Energydirected energy technology called Laser Guided Energy (“LGETM®”) and Laser Induced Plasma Channel (“LIPCTM®”). LGE and LIPC are technologies that can be used in a new generation of high-tech weapons.directed energy systems. The Department of Defense (DOD) previously recognized only two key types of Directed Energy Weapon (“DEW”) technologies, High Energy Lasers (“HEL”), and High-Power Microwave (“HPM”). Neither the HEL ornor the HPM areintellectual property portfolio is owned by a single entity. More recently, theThe DOD then designated a third DEW technology, LGE. Applied Energetics’ LGE and LIPC technologies are wholly owned by Applied Energetics and patent protected with 26 current patents and an additional 11 Government Sensitive Patent Applications (“GSPA”). These GSPA’s are held under secrecy orders of the US government and allow the company greatly extended protection rights. The company also has seven provisional patents, and we continue to file patent applications as we deem appropriate.

 

Applied Energetics technology is vastly different from conventional directed energy weapons,systems, i.e. HEL, and HPM. LGE uses Ultra-ShortUltrashort Pulse (USP)(USP™) laser technology to combine the speed and precision of lasers with the overwhelming impact ofon targeted threats with high-voltage electricity. Applied Energetics’ proprietary fiber-based architecture is a key differentiator for our technology. Compared with traditional continuous wave technology with larger footprints, AE’s architecture enables orders of magnitude size-weight-power reductions on all deliverables, creating powerful, dual-use and agile systems that can fit a host of platforms while delivering very high intensity, ultrashort pulses of light to the required target. This unique directed energy solution allows extremely high peak power and energy, with target and effects tenability, and is effective against a wide variety of potential targets. A key element of LGE is its novel ability to offer selectable and tunable properties that can help protect non-combatants and combat zone infrastructure.

 

Applied Energetics’ unique optical fiber-based laser architectures enable unmatched wavelength agility as well as pulse duration agility. Using innovative and highly specialized frequency shifting techniques, wavelengths can be custom tuned from the deep ultraviolet to the far Infrared. In addition, temporal outputs can be adjusted from continuous wave to sub-picoseconds. The technology enables the customer to adjust the lasers’ operating parameters, ultimately creating more flexibility to change wavelength and pulse width. This feature allows for optimization of laser performance for defense or commercial applications.

Our proprietary USP laser technology provides a significantly more compact solution than current continuous wave laser platforms while still delivering high peak power. Continuous wave laser systems are typically used to heat a target and, during continuous illumination, this heat transfer leads to melting or charring of the material. Using continuous wave output powers that now exceed 100 kilowatts (1kW = 1000 watts), it can take anywhere from seconds to minutes to impact a target. By contrast, our team has delivered USP lasers to national security customers that exceed five terawatts (1 TW = 1 trillion watts) in peak power, with the difference being that this peak power from a USP laser is delivered in a pulse that is less than a trillionth of a second. During this short pulse duration, and having such a high peak intensity, near-instantaneous ablation of the surface of the threat takes place. The net result of our innovative USP approaches are highly effective lasers with mountable footprints that require only a fraction of the size and weight of other directed energy technologies.

As Applied Energetics moveslooks toward the future, our corporate strategic roadmap builds upon the significant value of the company’s USP capabilities and key intellectual property, including LGE and LIPC, to offer our prospective partners, co-developers and system integrators a variety of next-generation Ultra Short-PulseUltrashort Pulse and frequency-agile optical sources, from the ultraviolet to the far infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, to address numerous challenges within the military, medical device, and advanced manufacturing market sectors.


LETTER TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS

 

Our Chief Executive Officer


Business Development

We submitted multiple proposals to various government agencies in 2020 and 2021. Due to the closures of multiple agencies and work-from-home orders across various regions of the United States, reviews and funding decisions on these proposals were delayed longer than anticipated as resources were focused on other matters within the government. AERG has preparedreceived multiple notices from government agencies stating that “the vast number of proposals received, and issued the following letterchallenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, have impacted the government’s evaluation timelines.” Several of the government agencies that have received and are reviewing our proposals started to open their facilities to limited off-site briefings starting on June 1, 2021. Since that date, AERG’s team has been invited to, and completed, multiple briefings focused on our capabilities and submissions. Effective August 2, 2021, the DOD reinstated a maximum telework position for their employees and contractors and reduced the on-site occupancy to less than 50% of the normal occupancy. As the Delta variant increased, the DOD maintained the maximum telework policy, and on September 9, 2021, reduced the maximum on-site occupancy to less than 40% of normal occupancy. Further restrictions were announced on January 6, 2022, due to the onslaught of the Omicron variant, with maximum occupancy of facilities dropping to 25%, and a majority of workers teleworking. These recent changes further hampered our ability to schedule on-site briefings for our proposals undergoing review. Beginning March 2022, the DOD has announced a loosening of these restrictions in certain circumstances. In any event, we intend to continue developing and submitting proposals and to be available to attend on-site briefings to the extent possible.

In addition to these review-based delays, the US federal budget for 2022 was not approved by Congress by the October 1, 2021, start of the U.S. federal government fiscal year. On September 21, 2021, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 5305, and on September 30, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the same bill, a continuing resolution (CR) to extend federal government funding through December 3, 2021, and the President signed it into law (Public Law 117-43) on September 30, 2021, to avoid a government shutdown at the end of the fiscal year 2021. A second CR was signed into law on December 2, 2021, extending funded operations through February 18, 2022. And most recently, a third CR was signed on February 17, 2022, extending funding through March 11, 2022. The final appropriations bill was signed into law by President Biden on the night of March 11, 2022 and includes increases in areas of particular interest to the company.

Pursuant to our stockholders:Master Services Agreement, Westpark Advisors, LLC assists the company in its comprehensive sales and marketing strategy for the greater Washington DC area and broader Department of Defense markets. Westpark Advisors focuses on the company’s next generation USP laser technologies, along with LGE and the company’s other novel laser technologies and provides business development, program management and strategy consulting services, including sales and marketing of the company’s product line. Westpark Advisors’ Managing Director, Patrick Williams provides full-time support to the company under this agreement. This agreement, which was originally executed as of July 16, 2018, was amended effective April 21, 2021, to grant Westpark Advisors options to purchase an additional 1,000,000 shares of AERG common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, in exchange for Westpark Advisors’ continued service to the company. The options vest over a period of three years from the date of the amendment. Otherwise, the other provisions of the agreement remain in force and unchanged.  

 

Dear Stockholders:Recent Developments

 

Upon the successful examination, and with no opposition, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) officially entered the marks LGE® (Reg. No. 6,289,892) and LIPC® (Reg. No. 6,316,069) on March 9, 2021, and April 6, 2021, respectively, in the principal register. AERG has applications pending before the USPTO for USP, USPL, AERG and AE and anticipates allowance and/or registration within the next 12 months. The company also has seven provisional patents, and we continue to file patent applications as we deem appropriate.

The team at Applied Energetics continued to expand during the third and fourth quarters of 2021 and early 2022, with the addition of two new full-time employees (one, a laser technician and the other a junior scientist) and in-house counsel as well as retention of world-class contractors to strengthen our human resources, compliance, public relations, IT, and technical staff supporting the research and development in the laboratory. On behalfFebruary 22, 2022, we hired an Executive Administrative Assistant to assist the CEO and CLO with organizational administration.

Christopher Donaghey serves on Applied Energetics’ Board of Advisors, on which he has input into the strategic direction of the company and provides assistance in building lasting relationships in our defense markets. Effective January 3, 2022, we agreed with Mr. Donaghey to further extended the term of his service for an additional five years, adding an exclusivity requirement which prohibits Mr. Donaghey from providing the same advisory services to other companies in the directed energy space. The company issued Mr. Donaghey options to purchase up to 750,000 shares of its common stock on exchange for his agreement to extend his term and such exclusivity. The options are exercisable at a price of $2.40 per share and are subject to vesting at a rate of 20% per year beginning on May 12, 2024.


Chris Donaghey currently serves as the senior vice president and head of corporate development for Science Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”), a defense and government agency technology integrator. In his role on Applied Energetics’ Board of Advisors, Mr. Donaghey provides input into the strategic direction of the Company and assistance in building relationships in the defense markets. Mr. Donaghey was originally appointed to the Board of Advisors, effective April 30, 2019, and effective May 12, 2021, we had agreed to extend the term of his service for an additional one-year term plus a one-year automatic renewal in exchange for 70,000 shares of AERG’s common stock, and options to purchase an additional 200,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.61 per share, for each year of service. The shares and options are also subject to vesting over the term of his service.

Effective January 1, 2022, the board of directors of Applied Energetics appointed Mary P. O’Hara to serve as its General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer. The company and Ms. O’Hara entered into an Executive Employment Agreement, pursuant to which she is to serve for an initial term of three years, with automatic renewal for additional one-year periods thereafter unless either party terminates the agreement. The agreement calls for salary of $250,000 per year, plus standard benefits and eligibility for a bonus at the discretion of the board. The company has also granted Ms. O’Hara additional options to purchase up to 640,000 shares of its common stock under its 2018 Incentive Stock Plan, which vest over four years, at an exercise price of $2.40 per share. Ms. O’Hara has been in private law practice for twenty-nine years and has broad experience in all facets of securities, corporate and commercial law. Ms. O’Hara has represented the company for several years and is a member of its board of directors.

In May 2021, we moved into our new headquarters consisting of approximately 13,000 rentable square feet of office, laboratory and production space located at the University of Arizona Tech Park, a research and technology park owned and operated by the University of Arizona. This has enabled us to consolidate our offices and expand our R&D capacity with a Class 1000 (ISO Class 6) “clean room” and other turnkey laboratory and conference features. We have consolidated from our two previous locations and now have our management and scientific teams under one roof. We also held our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the large University of Arizona Tech Park Conference Center, which provided the necessary equipment and refreshments. Attendees at the meeting received tours of the tech park grounds.

We entered into the Lease Agreement for the space, effective March 15, 2021, with Campus Research Corporation. The lease term began May 1, 2021, and ends on April 30, 2026. The base rent is $6.7626 per rentable square foot for year one, and escalates to $9.2009 in year two, $11.4806 in year three, $13.1740 in year four and $14.9306 in year five, plus certain operating expenses and taxes. 

The space was previously occupied by a global provider of lasers and laser-based technology which vacated prior to the end of its lease term. Thus, we are benefiting from millions of dollars of capital investment made to the facilities by the vacating tenant, and the vacating tenant continues to pay a portion of the full market rent, with the company paying the balance in the amounts set forth above. This location, as an International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and laser safety compliant facility totaling approximately 13,000 square feet, with its approximately 4,800 square-foot Class 1000 (ISO 6) cleanroom, provides us the needed capacity for research, product development and production activities.

We followed the guidelines set forth by the Small Business Administration on the Paycheck Protection Program loan, in the amount of $132,760 which we took out in 2020, partially using the proceeds for designated qualifying expenses, in particular, retaining employees. This qualified AERG for a waiver of a portion of the loan. Accordingly, on July 2, 2021, we received a letter from our bank, via the SBA, approving conversion of $80,593.55 of the loan to a grant. Since then, we have been repaying the balance of the loan in monthly installments at the 1% annual interest rate. As of December 31, 2021, $22,804 in principal and $1,385 in interest remained outstanding, and we expect to repay the remaining balance in April 2022.

Path Forward

Our goal with the AERG Strategic Plan is to increase the energy, peak power and frequency agility of fiber-based USP optical sources while decreasing the size, weight, power-consumption and cost of these systems. We are in the process of developing this breadth of very high peak power USP lasers and additional optical sources that have a very broad range of applicability for threat disruption for the Department of Defense, the intelligence community, and for commercial, biomedical, and space applications. Although the historical market for AERG’s USP technology is the U.S. Government, derivatives of these USP technologies could provide future platforms for commercial additive and subtractive manufacturing and medical device and optical imaging markets, creating larger dual-use market for our products to address once testing, evaluation and integration have been completed in partnerships with the user community. During 2020, the AERG team I would likewas able to develop partnership and teaming arrangements with the three leading laser and optics institutes in the United States, namely, the University of Arizona, the University of Central Florida, and the University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics. Our desire is to work on programs jointly where the strengths of each organization can assist in escalating knowledge and delivery of systems to the government sponsors, and to train the next generation of scientists and engineers to work in the Directed Energy fields.


The ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic does present this letterunique risks and uncertainties that may alter or otherwise affect our path forward. On January 8, 2022, the Pentagon decided to stockholdersextend its max telework policy to occupancies of our companyless than 25%, and officials increased the region’s Health Protection Condition (HPCON) to explain details about important eventsthreat level Charlie. The increase marked the highest health alert at the Pentagon since the end of 2020. In early March 2022, the Pentagon released these protections somewhat to threat level Bravo, returning to 50% occupancy in 2019most workspaces and incircumstances. Our management continues to monitor the possible effects of the COVID-19 on the execution of our plan of operations, our prospective contracts, and the availability of financing to fund our strategic and operational plans going forward. Despite these challenges, we have continued to execute our business plan fordevelopment plans. During the past two fiscal years, we submitted multiple proposals and have been engaged in meetings on a daily and weekly basis with various agencies and departments both remotely and in person in Washington, DC and at various other government facilities. Dr. Quarles, our President and CEO, has traveled to DC on multiple occasions during the pandemic in 2020 and over2021 and remains very committed to pursuing this business even in these challenging times. The interest in our technology and applications remains high, and we continue to submit proposals for all appropriate opportunities and share our vision of the long term. disruptive capabilities of USP™ optical sources for both near- and far-term threats and dual-use commercial applications.

 

I am pleasedThrough our analysis of the market, and in discussions with potential customers, we would also conclude that customers are becoming more receptive and interested in directed energy technologies. According to sharethe Department of Defense fiscal 2019 budget, its directed energy spending grew from approximately $500 million in 2017 to over $1 billion in 2019, an increase of 100%. The 2020 budget reflected directed energy spending of $1.2 billion, an additional increase of 20% over 2019, and from 2017 through 2020, the directed energy budget grew from approximately $500 million to approximately $1.2 billion, averaging approximately 40% per year. The government has allocated $1.4 billion for various directed energy programs in 2021, and market analysis and projections have estimated that therethis directed energy sector is anticipated to exceed $10.1 billion globally by 2026. The DOD budget for directed energy was essentially flat between 2021 and 2022, approaching $1.2 billion for each year. As a result, we continue to be optimistic about our future and the growing opportunities in directed energy applications. The AERG team anticipates a continuation of strong funding for the directed energy community. With our existing patent portfolio, and through further advancements of our technologies, we believe we have the substantial building blocks needed to become a significant and successful developer in our USP and LGE marketplaces.

Market for Our Technology

Directed Energy Systems

Directed energy systems involve the use of directed energy to incapacitate, damage, or destroy enemy equipment, facilities, and assets. Previous to LGE, the only two viable directed energy systems were High Energy Laser (HEL), which uses heat to burn targets and High Power Microwave (HPM) systems, that use electromagnetic energy at specific microwave and radio frequencies to disable electronic systems.

HEL and HPM directed energy technologies have been under development for decades with numerous DoD and other government contractors participating. The unique attributes of directed energy weapon systems —the ability to create precise effects against multiple positive developments with Applied Energetics over the past year. Our engagement within the Directed Energy arena, the prime defense contract community,targets near-instantaneously and investment institutions has continued to move forward at a higher than anticipated level since I joinedvery low cost per shot—have great potential to help the company as CEODoD in May and throughout Q3 and Q4 of 2019. Much of this interaction has been focused upon briefing potential partners of Applied Energetics’ strategic plan and the supporting technology roadmap. This emphasis on business development and collaborative interactions bodes well for AERG’s long-term corporate growth potential.

During the last half of 2019, our management team made significant progress integrating the Applied Optical Sciences (AOS) team into AERG’s business and corporate structure following the completed purchase of certain AOS assets. In addition, we received an extension for deliverables in phase 2 of our current contract with a large government integrator of laser and optical systems and delivered the final product on time at the end of 2019.

Applied Energetics’ board of directors, executive team and scientific team continue to execute AERG’s strategy centered around these key components: world-class personnel, the strength of our innovation capabilities, our intellectual property portfolio, and strong growth in our addressable markets. During Q3 our team entered into a cooperative Research Agreement with the Arizona Board of Regents of the University of Arizona. Our work together is focused on theaddressing future warfare requirements. The DoD invests research and development dollars into directed energy solutions to fill gaps identified by warfighters. For example, in future conflicts with capable enemies possessing large inventories of advanced frequency agile optical sourcesguided missiles, it may be operationally risky and ultra-short pulse laserscost-prohibitive for applications that include counter-threat and dual-use manufacturing technologies. Additionally, we remain vigilant in our efforts to expand upon our intellectual property portfolio through corporate-funded IR&D and filing of various patent and trademark applications with the U.S. Patentmilitary to continue to rely exclusively on a limited number of kinetic missile interceptors. Such a “missile competition” could allow an adversary to impose costs on U.S. forces by compelling them to intercept each incoming missile with far more expensive kinetic munitions. The DoD has made significant leaps in both performance and Trademark Office (USPTO).maturity as a result of many years of research with multiple threat-intercept technologies and has been directed by Congress in fiscal year 2022 to increase funding and evaluation of pulsed laser technology in future directed energy platforms.


Applied Energetics utilizes patented, dual-use technologies to advance critical industries. Leveraging our proprietary fiber-based architecture and wavelength- and pulse-agility capability, our ultrashort pulse technology enables users to achieve specific effects across different use cases with an unmatched blend of size, weight and power attributes. While initially designed to meet the emerging needs and priorities for the national security community, Applied Energetics’ directed energy technology also has commercial applications in both the biomedical and advanced manufacturing industries.

Fiber Based Laser Architecture

Applied Energetics’ proprietary fiber-based architecture is a key differentiator for our technology. Compared with traditional continuous wave technology with larger footprints, AE’s architecture enables orders of magnitude size-weight-power reductions on all deliverables, creating powerful, dual-use and agile systems that can fit a host of platforms while delivering very high intensity, ultrashort pulses of light to the required target.

Using this unique architecture as a laser source for an integrated system can enable Applied Energetics to develop, integrate and deliver a suite of technologies that best meet the needs and requirements of its customers.

Wavelength- and Pulse- Agility

Applied Energetics’ optical fiber-based laser architectures enable unmatched wavelength agility as well as pulse duration agility. Using innovative and highly specialized frequency shifting techniques, wavelengths can be custom tuned from the deep ultraviolet to the far infrared. In early Q4 we received noticesaddition, temporal outputs can be adjusted from continuous wave to sub-picoseconds. The technology enables the customer to adjust the lasers’ operating parameters, ultimately creating more flexibility to change wavelength and pulse width. This feature allows for optimization of allowance of two trademark applicationslaser performance for defense or commercial applications.

Competition

AERG’s Ultrashort Pulse sources, including proprietary LIPC® based LGE® technology, are unique and can be integrated onto platforms being developed for use by the USPTOU.S. Government. Over the past several years, a handful of major defense contractors have received significant funding for LGETM (Laser Guided Energy)directed energy systems development, manufacturing and for LIPCTM (Laser Induced Plasma Channel)integration, using continuous wave and Applied Energetics was notified that our petitionmicrowave technologies. These contractors specialize in different directed energy system platforms to revive a significant patent was approved. Our expanding portfolio of patents and IP covers a range of technologies spanning ultra-short pulse lasers and optical sources, laser guided energy, and laser-induced plasma channels, all of which should contributerespond to developing solutions in growing addressable markets.

One of the highlights of this year was the announcement by the US Army STTR office that Applied Energetics had been selected to receive a contract award with a proposal value of $165,920 to investigate Standoff Electronic Denial systems using ultrashort pulse lasers. STTR is a federally funded program to incorporate small business technological innovation into Government supported Research and Development programs. STTR’s require the small business to formally collaborate with a university or non-profit and are structured in three phases. The Army anticipates funding one (1) STTR Phase II for each of seven (7) “special topics” and Phase II contracts are limited to a maximum of $1,100,000 over a period between 6 and 18 months. The negotiation of this Phase 1 contract for the full award value was completed, and the contract executed, on March 4, 2020 and includes a partnership with the Laser Plasma Laboratory at the University of Central Florida. This first contract award for the newly evolved Applied Energetics came more rapidly than originally projected in our strategic plan and illustrates the acceptance of AERG’s ultrashort pulse optical source technologies by the defense sector.

As we move forward in 2020 and beyond, management believes Applied Energetics’ advanced technology business opportunities have never been greater. Our interactions with a variety of federalthreats. Applied Energetics believes that its pulsed laser systems can be a part of a layered defense solution alongside these other technologies. Although AERG competes against other directed energy systems for funding, the uniqueness of our technologies should continue to support their development into weapon platform programs. AERG believes that there is renewed U.S. Government interest in directed energy applications and believes that continued development of its USP capabilities and growing interest from all branches of the U.S. armed forces and other government agencies have resultedwill lead to increases in multiple proposal submissions at the request of various program managers early in 2020. The federalgovernment spending on directed energy platformsin the coming years. Likewise, there are multiple new threats that must be addressed with unique and weapons has exceeded $1 billion foremerging technologies, and AERG is working diligently to rapidly advance development, demonstration, testing and engineering of the second yearAdvanced Ultrashort Pulse lasers throughout the spectrum from the ultraviolet to the far infrared. We believe that USP technologies can rapidly accelerate in magnitude, as a row and AERG’s technology roadmap illustratespercentage of the opportunity to utilize our existing IP portfolio and to innovate, develop, demonstrate and deploy laser and optical source-based systems that could have a direct impact on defeating the emerging global threats infederal budget, compared with other technologies over the next several years.

 

Our corporate leadership is monitoring closely the coronavirus pandemicAERG’s primary direct USP optical source competition are corporations and contractors supported by foreign governments who may be attempting to develop similar technologies. AERG believes that has escalatedsuch foreign activity will create additional U.S. Government funding for both USP sources and LGE in early 2020, and we realize that these challenging times and work-from-home directives by the federal agencies might delay the review of submitted proposals. We are confident that the threat environmentorder to maintain our country’s lead in thepulsed directed-energy systems. Other companies with directed energy sphere will not drastically change,capabilities, albeit in continuous wave, microwave and the need for our solutions will remain strong. We will be patientother areas within directed energy, are Raytheon Technologies, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Boeing, BAE, nLight, General Atomics, Daylight Solutions and vigilant in our replies to our partners within the defense departmentL3Harris Technologies.

Some of AERG’s biggest commercial competitors are Trumpf (German), Coherent (US), Thales (France) and the prime contract community and be ready to innovate next-generation technology to meet their needs.IPG (US), all of which are billion-dollar market class companies that have substantially more resources than AERG.

 

Finally, I would like to thank all stakeholders in Applied Energetics - employees, customers, suppliers, partners and stockholders - for their support as we position the company to grow and implement innovation in the manufacturing, device and defense sectors. We look forward to a successful 2020.


 

Sincerely,

 

Gregory J. Quarles, PhD

Chief Executive OfficerEmployees


Applied Energetics 2019 Accomplishments and News of Importance

 

Effective February 15, 2019, AERG entered into a Consulting and Advisory Services Agreement with WCCventures, LLC (“WCC”) whereby WCC provides advice and guidance to management including business strategy, marketing and capital needs.
Effective February 15, 2019, AERG retained corporate communications firm Cameron Associates (“CA”), to provide investor relations services on behalf of the company including counseling management on appropriate investor communications, preparing and distributing press releases and other public documents, orchestrating conference calls and responding to investor inquiries. CA and its principal, Kevin McGrath, worked closely with AE as investor relations consultants starting from the company’s inception in 2004 through 2011. We were pleased to welcome back both CA and Kevin McGrath as AERG continues forward with its corporate business plan.
Effective April 29, 2019, Applied Energetics established a Board of Advisors to work with its Board of Directors and key management personnel on specific areas of significance to the company. Applied Energetics appointed Christopher “Chris” Donaghey of Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC) as its first member.
Gregory J. Quarles was hired as the Chief Executive officer of AERG on May 6, 2019.
AERG entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement of Applied Optical Sciences, Inc. on May 29, 2019. AOS was a Tucson-based corporation of which Stephen W. McCahon was the majority shareholder.
Mr. McCahon was also retained under a Consulting Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2019, with AERG and has been retained as the acting Chief Scientist.

October 2019 USPTO activities – Notice of Allowance of trademark for LIPC (10/3/2019); Notice of Allowance of trademark for LGE (10/8/2019); Petition of allowance to revive a significant patent (10/18/19)

Applied Energetics hosted its shareholder meeting on October 30, 2019 in Phoenix, Arizona.
Applied Energetics was notified of its first DOD contract award in December 2019.
On January 23, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a Memorandum Opinion, granting the company a preliminary injunction, in our litigation against George Farley, Applied Energetics’ former CEO and AnneMarieCo LLC (“AMC”), prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock, which the company alleges were improperly issued. In granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. In its Memorandum Opinion, the court also required that the company post additional bond money, bringing the total cash collateral for the surety agreement to $582,377.26, which the company has done. On September 26, 2019, the company filed a motion for partial summary judgment concerning the issuance of company stock to Mr. Farley without having been authorized by a quorum of the board of directors. Following assignment of a new vice chancellor in the case, we are now awaiting a July 20, 2020 trial date based on the Delaware Chancery’s January 29, 2020 scheduling order. We cannot be certain whether the recent outbreak of the Covid-19 Coronavirus will affect the timing of the trial. For a more detailed discussion of this litigation, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

In a related matter, on February 8, 2019, the company filed a complaint against Stein Riso Mantel McDonough, LLP (“Stein Riso”), its former counsel, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging the following:

1.breach of fiduciary duty;
2.legal malpractice;
3.aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty;
4.voidance of fees under New York Rules of Professional Conduct 1.8;
5.violation of New York Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5;
6.securities fraud;
7.breach of contract; and
8.unjust enrichment.

On July 3, 2019, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and its partner, Ryan Whalen, counsel for defendants, George Farley and AnneMarie Co. LLC, in the litigation brought by the company and pending in Delaware, filed a claim in the District Court for the Southern District of New York against the company its directors, officers, attorneys and a consultant. The action alleges libel, securities fraud and related claims. The company believes that this suit lacks merit and intends to dispute these allegations. The company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on October 24, 2019. The plaintiffs have not yet filed a response to this motion. On December 13, 2019, Gusrae Kaplan and Mr. Whalen filed an opposition to the Company’s motion. On January 10, 2020, the company filed a reply brief. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the motion.

Applied Energetics 2020 Accomplishments and News of Importance

As of March 4, 2020, AERG executed a contract agreement having a value of $165,919.77 with the US Army under their STTR program for a 90-day Phase 1 research program to investigate Standoff Electronic Denial systems using ultrashort pulse lasers. The Army anticipates funding one (1) STTR Phase II for each of seven (7) “special topics” and Phase II contracts are limited to a maximum of $1,100,000 over a period between 6 and 18 months. Sequential/Subsequent Phase II funding, as well as non-SBIR/STTR funding, may also be available.

Multiple proposals were submitted to various government agencies in 2019 and 2020. Due to the closures of multiple agencies and work-from-home orders across various regions of the United States, we anticipate that reviews and funding decisions on these proposals might be delayed longer than anticipated as resources are focused on other matters within the government.

Employees

As of March 29, 2020,28, 2022, we had one employee,seven employees, and we retain fouranother nine full- and part-time consultants.consultants and interns.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

Future results of operations of Applied Energetics involve a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect future operating results and cash flows and cause actual results to vary materially from historical results include, but are not limited to those risks set forth below:

 

Risk Related to Our Company

 

Our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which may hinder our ability to obtain future financing.

 

In their report accompanying our financial statements, our independent registered public accounting firm stated that our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20192021 were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern, and that they have substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors have noted that our recurring losses and negative cash flow from operations and the concern that we may incur additional losses due to the reduction in government contract activity raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

5

Our business has generated little or no revenues during the past two fiscal years and had a net operating loss during each period.

 

For each of the company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, we had no revenues of $0 and $175,920, respectively, and we had net operating losses of $5,171,807$5,425,453 and $2,762,404 for fiscal years 2019 and 2018,$3,230,494, respectively. We can give no assurances that our planned operations will generate revenues in the future or whether any such revenues will result in profitability.

 

We willmay need additional financing to fund our operations going forward. If we are unable to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, we may need to modify or curtail our development plans and operations.

 

As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had approximately $88,000$3,662,615 of available cash and cash equivalents.equivalents and working capital of $2,290,259. Our cash position is sufficient for the next fewseveral months, but we willmay need to raise additional capital in order to fund our operations.operations beyond that. We are currently involved in litigation with our former CEO which will continue to consume a portion of our operating budget. In addition, we must allocate funds toward SEC compliance as well as ITARInternational Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and other federal regulatory compliance. We also need funds for our general and administrative expenses, including salaries, accounting fees, other professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses. Our failure to secure sufficient financing could render us unable to pay accounting and other fees required to continue to fulfill our SEC reporting obligations. Also, we have incurred a five-year lease obligation for our new facility and will have moving, computer networking and other expenses related thereto. We also may require additional funding for research and development before we are able to commercialize our technology. ADuring the fiscal year, we achieved our capital raising goal, and a portion of the funds for research and development may come from government contracts or sub-contracts with larger contractors. However, we will likelymay need to raise additional funds to supplement these sourcescontracts even if we are able to secure them.

 

Our operating plans and capital requirements are subject to change based on how we determine to proceed with respect to development programs and if we pursue any strategic alternatives. Additional funds may be raised through the issuance of equity securities, and/or debtbut such financing there being no assurance that any type of financingmay not be available on terms acceptable to us will be available or otherwise occur. Debt financing must be repaid regardless of whether we generate revenues or cash flows from operations and may be secured by substantially all of our assets.if at all. Any equity financing or debt financing that requires the issuance of warrants or other equity securities to the lender would cause the percentage ownership by our current stockholders to be diluted, which dilution may be substantial. Also, any additional equity securities issued may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. If such financing is not available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may be required to modify or curtail our operations, which could cause investors to lose the entire amount of their investment.

 


The ongoing global pandemic has caused cessation of business and causeunpredictability in capital markets to decline sharply. Thismarkets. If this uncertainty continues, it could make it more difficult for companies, including ours, to access capital. It is currently difficult to estimate with any certainty how long the pandemic and resulting curtailment of business will continue, and its effect on capital markets and our ability to raise funds in the future is, accordingly, difficult to quantifyquantify.

 

Risk Related to Our Business Activities

 

We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, which could affect our ability to sustain the value of such assets.

 

Protecting our intellectual property rights is critical to our ability to maintain the value of our intellectual property.property portfolio. We hold a number of United States patents and patent applications, as well as trademarks, and registrations which are necessary and contribute significantly to the preservation of our competitive position in the market. We can offer no assurance that any of these patents or future patent applications and other intellectual property will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented by third parties. In some instances, we have augmentedmay seek to augment our technology base by licensing the proprietary intellectual property of others. In the future,others, but we may not be ableunable to obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms. While weWe have entered into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with ouremployees and consultants and entered into nondisclosure agreements with suppliers and appropriate customers so as to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information. These measures may not suffice to deter misappropriation or independent third-party development of similar technologies. Based on our current financial condition, we may not have the funds available to enforce and protect our intellectual properties.

 

We may face claims of infringement of proprietary rights.

 

There is a risk that a third party may claim our products and technologies infringe on their proprietary rights. Whether or not our products infringe on proprietary rights of third parties, infringement or invalidity claims may be asserted or prosecuted against us and we could incur significant expense in defending them. If any claims or actions are asserted against us, we may not have the funds necessary to defend against such claims. Our failure to do so could adversely affect the value of our intellectual property.

  

6

Management has broad discretion over the selection of our prospective business and business opportunities

 

Any person who invests in our securities will do so without an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of our prospective business and business opportunities. As a result, investors will be entirely dependent on the broad discretion and judgment of management in connection with the selection of a prospective business. The business decisions made by our management may not be successful.

 

We depend on the recruitment and retention of qualified personnel, and failure to attract and retain such personnel could seriously harm our business.

 

Due to the specialized nature of our businesses, our future performance is highly dependent upon the continued services of our key engineering and scientific personnel. To the extent we obtain GovernmentOur prospects for obtaining government contracts or significant commercial contracts our prospects depend upon our ability to attract and retain qualified engineering, scientific and manufacturing personnel for our operations. Competition for personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting or retaining qualified personnel. Our failure to compete for these personnel could seriously harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, since the majority of our business involves technologies that are classified due to national security reasons, we must hire U.S. Citizens who have the ability to obtain a security clearance. This further reduces our potential labor pool.

 

Our future success will depend on our ability to develop and commercialize technologies and applications that address the needs of our markets.

 

Both our defense and commercial markets are characterized by rapidly changing technologies and evolving industry standards. Accordingly, our future performance depends on a number of factors, including our ability to:to identify emerging technological trends in our target markets; develop and maintain competitive products; enhance our products by improving performance and adding innovative features that differentiate our products from those of our competitors; develop and manufacture and bring products to market on-time and on-budget; and enter into suitable arrangements for volume production of mature products.

 

identify emerging technological trends in our target markets;
develop and maintain competitive products;
enhance our products by improving performance and adding innovative features that differentiate our products from those of our competitors;
develop and manufacture and bring products to market quickly at cost-effective prices;
obtain commercial scale production orders from our Government and other customers;
meet scheduled timetables and enter into suitable arrangements for the development, certification and delivery of new products;
enter into suitable arrangements for volume production of mature products.

 

We believe that, in order to be competitive in the future, we will need to continue to develop and commercialize technologies and products, which will require the investment of financial and engineering resources. Due to the design complexity of our products, we may in the future experience delays in completing development and introduction on a commercial scale of new products. Any delays could result in increased costs of development, deflect resources from other projects or incur loss of contracts.

 

In addition, there can be no assurance that the market for our technologies and products will develop or continue to expand as we currently anticipate. The failure of our technology to gain market acceptance could significantly reduce ourany ability to generate revenue and harm our business. Furthermore, we cannot be sure that our competitors will not develop competing or differing technologies which gain market acceptance in advance of our products. The possibility that our competitors might develop new technology or products might cause our existing technology and products to become obsolete or create significant price competition. If we fail in our new product development and commercialization efforts or our products fail to achieve market acceptance more rapidly than our competitors, our revenue will decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations will be negatively affected.

 

Stockholders may not receive disclosure or information regarding a prospective business and business opportunities

As of the date of this annual report, we have not yet identified any prospective business or industry in which we may seek to become involved and at present we have no information concerning any prospective business. Management is not required to and may not provide stockholders with disclosure or information regarding any prospective business opportunities. Moreover, a prospective business opportunity may not result in a benefit to stockholders or prove to be more favorable to stockholders than any other investment that may be made by stockholders and investors.


We heavily depend on Gregory J. Quarles, our Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen McCahon, our Chief Scientist,key personnel, for the successful execution of our business plan. The loss of Dr. Quarlesone or McCahon or othermore key members of our management team could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects.

 

We are highly dependent upon Gregory J. Quarles, our Chief Executive Officer, and Stephen McCahon, our ChiefScientist. Scientist. We depend on Drs. Quarles’s and McCahon’s decades of expertise for the development of our technology. We also depend upon their global visibility and outreach as well as our directors’ networks of contacts and experience to recruit key talent to the Company. We do not have key-man insurance on any of these individuals. Loss of the services of these key members of our management team, or of our Board of Directors’ ability to identify and hire key talent, could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

 

If we are unable to hire additional qualified personnel, our business prospects may suffer.

 

Our success and achievement of our business plans depend upon our ability to recruit, hire, train and retain additional highly qualified technical and managerial personnel. Competition for qualified employees among high technology companies is intense, and any inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees required for the implementation of our business plans and activities could strongly impact our business. Our inability to attract and retain the necessary technical and managerial personnel and scientific, regulatory and other consultants and advisors could materially damage our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The market for our technology has a limited number of potential customers.

 

Given the highly specialized nature of our technology, the potential market for our products is limited to a relative few potential customers who tend to allocate significant budgeted amounts to selected projects. Currently, we are marketing our technology and focusing our research and development on the defense sector, in which demand is ultimately determined primarily by the US federal defense budget and the needs and priorities of the Department of Defense and its various agencies. The potential customers in this area are defense agencies for direct contacts and major defense contractors for subcontracts. Thus the demand for our products depends on their needs for our technology and selecting us for research and development. Although we intend to diversify into other applications for our technology and markets, we cannot be certain that opportunities in those markets will present themselves when we are ready, or that we will otherwise be able, to do so.

 


Risks Related to Our Securities

 

We are subject to the penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission that require brokers to provide extensive disclosure to their customers prior to executing trades in penny stocks. These disclosure requirements, coupled with our status as a former shell company, may cause a reduction in the trading activity of our common stock, and make it difficult for our stockholders to sell their securities.

 

Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a minimum bid price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a limited number of exceptions which are not available to us. This classification would severely and adversely affect any market liquidity for our common stock.

 

For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the penny stock rules require that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks and the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.  In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must obtain financial information and investment experience and objectives of the person and make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and that that person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

 

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, sets forth:

 

The basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and

That the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction

 

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commission payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

 

Because of these regulations and restrictions, broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the above-referenced necessary paperwork and disclosures and/or may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which may affect the ability of selling stockholders or other holders to sell their shares in any secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our common stock. In addition, the liquidity for our common stock may decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our common stock. Our common stock, in all probability, will be subject to such penny stock rules and other restrictions for the foreseeable future and our stockholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their shares of common stock.


Because we are a former shell company, our stockholders face restrictions on their reliance on rule 144 to sell their shares.

 

Historically, the SEC staff has taken the position that Rulerule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by companies that are, or previously were, blank checkshell companies, like us.AERG. The SEC has codified and expanded this position in the amendments discussed above by prohibiting the use of Rulerule 144 for resale of securities issued by any shell companies (other than business combination related shell companies) or any issuer that has been at any time previously a shell company. The SEC has provided an important exception to this prohibition, however, if the following conditions are met:

 


Thethe issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;

Thethe issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;

Thethe issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Current Reports on Form 8-K; and

Atat least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current comprehensive disclosure with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.

 

We expect that we will be able to meet all of these requirements in the future, but unknown future events and circumstances could change that outcome. As a result, pursuant to Rulerule 144, stockholders who receive our restricted securities in a private placement or a business combination may not be able to sell our shares without registration for up to one year after we have completed the private placement or business combination.

 

A large number of shares of our common stock could be sold in the market in the near future, which could depress our stock price.

 

As of March 26, 2020,2022, we had outstanding approximately 207 million207,562,461 shares of common stock. Approximately 96100 million of our shares are currently freely trading without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,18 million havingamended. The remaining shares have been held by their holders for over one year and are thus eligible for sale under Rule 144(k) of the Securities Act. Sale of these shares into the market could depress our stock price.

 

Provisions of our corporate charter documents could delay or prevent change of control.

 

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock without stockholder approval, in one or more series and to fix the dividend rights, terms, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights and terms, liquidation preferences, and any other rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions applicable to each new series of preferred stock. In addition, our Certificate of Incorporation divides our board of directors into three classes, serving staggered three-year terms. At least two annual meetings, instead of one, will be required to effect a change in a majority of our board of directors. The designation of preferred stock in the future and the classification of our Board of Directors, could make it difficult for third parties to gain control of our company, prevent or substantially delay a change in control, discourage bids for our common stock at a premium, or otherwise adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Moreover, the holders of our outstanding Series A Preferred Stock have a right to put their shares to the company for an amount equal to the liquidation preference of approximately $340,000 plus unpaid dividends (approximately $221,000$295,000 as of December 31, 2019)2021), in the event of a change of control. Such right could hinder our ability to sell our assets or merge with another company.

 

The redemption and dividend provisions of our outstanding preferred stock are onerous due to our current financial condition.

 

The company has redeemed substantially all of its outstanding preferred stock. At December 31, 2019,2021, 13,602 shares were outstanding with a liquidation preference of approximately $340,000 and unpaid dividends of $221,000.$295,000. As of February 1, 2020,2022, the liquidation preference of our outstanding preferred stock plus unpaid dividends thereon was approximately $570,000.$635,000. If an event occurs that would require us to redeem the preferred stock, we may not have the required cash to do so.


In addition, our annual dividend payment on the preferred stock is approximately $34,000, which will further deplete our cash. We have not paid the dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1, 2013, and, as a result, the dividend rate has increased to 10% per annum and will remain at that level until such failure no longer continues. Dividends in arrears as of February 1, 2020 were approximately $230,000. These terms may also make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities or complete an acquisition.

 

We may require additional financing to maintain our reporting requirementsThe COVID-19 pandemic is slowing the process of applying for and administrative expenses.

We have no meaningful revenuesawarding government contracts and are dependent on our cash on hand to fund the costs associated with the reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and other administrative costs associated with our corporate existence. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we incurred net losses of approximately $5,556,000, $3,008,000 and $790,000, respectively. General and administrative expenses include salaries, accounting fees other professional fees and other miscellaneous expenses. We do not expect to generate any revenues unless and until the commencement of business operations. In the event that our available funds prove to be insufficient, we will be required to seek additional financing. Our failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on our ability to pay the accounting and other fees in order to continue to fulfill our reporting obligations and pursue our business plan. We do not have any arrangements with any bank or financial institution to secure additional financing and such financing may not be available on terms acceptable and in our best interests.

The global pandemic COVID-19, otherwise referred to as the Coronavirus, could impair our ability to expand our research and development capacity or raise additional funding or make such funding more costlyif needed.

 

The ongoing global pandemic has caused cessation of businessdisruption in certain government contracting processes and cause capital markets to decline sharply. This could make itprocedures and made travel and other necessities for securing such contracts more difficult for companies, including ours, to access capital. It is currently difficult to estimate with any certainty how long the pandemic and resulting curtailment of business will continue, and its effect on capital markets and our ability to raise funds is, accordingly, difficult to quantify.difficult. In addition, to the extent that any of our personnel or consultants are affected by the virus, this could cause delays or disruption in our research and development program and affect our ability to execute our plan of operations. The pandemic has also caused unpredictability in capital markets. If this uncertainty continues, it could make it more difficult for companies, including ours, to access capital. It is currently difficult to estimate with any certainty how long the pandemic and resulting will continue, and its effect on capital markets and our ability to raise funds in the future is, accordingly, difficult to quantify.

 

We will likely issue


Any issuance of additional securities in conjunction with a business or financing opportunity which will result in a dilution of present stockholderstockholders’ ownership

 

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of 500,000,000 shares of common stock. As of March 26, 2020,10, 2022, we have 206,569,062approximately 207,692,878 shares issued and outstanding. We expect toIf funding opportunities present themselves on favorable terms, we may issue additional shares to sustainfund our business or in connection with our pursuit of new business opportunities and new business operations. To the extent that additional shares of common stock are issued, our stockholders would experience dilution of their respective ownership interests. If we issue shares of common stock in connection with our intent to pursue new business opportunities, a change in control of our company is expected tocould occur. The issuance of additional shares of common stock may also adversely affect the market price of our common stock, particularly given the historically low trading volume in the event that an active trading market commences.for our common stock.

 

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

As ofEffective March 2020,15, 2021, we have month-to-month agreements to leaseentered into a Lease Agreement with Campus Research Corporation, for approximately 19013,000 rentable square feet of office, laboratory and production space as well as to lease approximately 4,270 square feetlocated at the University of officeArizona Science and Technology Park at 9070 South Rita Road, Tucson, AZ. The company has consolidated its offices and expanded its R&D capacity by leasing this space which is outfitted with a Class 1000 (ISO Class 6) “clean room” and other turnkey laboratory space in Tucson, Arizona.and conference features.

 

The lease term began May 1, 2021, and ends on April 30, 2026. The base rent is $6.7626 per rentable square foot for year one, and escalates to $9.2009 in year two, $11.4806 in year three, $13.1740 in year four and $14.9306 in year five, plus certain operating expenses and taxes.

These facilities are adequate for our current and expected level of operations.

Our aggregate rent expense, including common area maintenance costs, was approximately $30,000$155,000 and $4,000$49,000 for 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.

 

We believe our facilities are adequate for our currently expected level of operations.

See Note 67 to our 20192021 Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference for information with respect to our lease commitments aton December 31, 2019.2021.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

As previously reported, on July 3, 2018, we commenced a lawsuit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the company’s former director and principal executive officer George Farley and AnneMarieCo LLC (“AMC”).

The lawsuit alleges to the following six causes of action:

1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty against George Farley

2. Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Care against George Farley

3. Aiding and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty against AMC

4. Conversion against George Farley

5. Fraudulent Transfer against George Farley and AMC

6. Injunctive Relief against George Farley and AMC

This report provides an update on the progress of the litigation.

In connection with the lawsuit, the company requested a temporary restraining order prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock which the company alleges were improperly issued. On July 20, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves presiding, entered a “status quo” order upon the stipulation of the parties, whereby Mr. Farley and AMC agreed not to transfer, alienate or sell any of their shares pending a ruling on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

On July 26, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling order setting dates and deadlines for, among other matters, a hearing and briefing schedule on the amount of the bond the company would be required to post to maintain the “status quo” order through the preliminary injunction hearing, a hearing and briefing schedule on the motion for a preliminary injunction, and a discovery schedule.

Also, in connection with the lawsuit, on August 8, 2018, the company filed a motion to disqualify Mr. Farley’s attorney, Ryan Whalen, who had previously represented the company.

On August 14, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order requiring the company to post a bond in the total amount of $200,446.52. On August 21, 2018, the company posted the bond via Atlantic Specialty Insurance company acting as surety. Pursuant to the contract between the company and Atlantic Specialty Insurance company, the company deposited $200,446.52 in cash as collateral for the surety agreement.

On August 23, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery court extended the hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction to October 23, 2018, and simultaneously ordered an increase in the bond amount of $55,446.52. On August 30, 2018, the company posted the increased bond amount, again with Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company acting as surety, and deposited the additional $55,446.52 in cash with the surety.

On September 7, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order setting a briefing schedule on the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.

On September 10, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order governing the production and exchange of confidential documents and information among the parties in discovery.


In another Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 13, 2018, the company updated the status of the litigation to include events that occurred up to that date. This report further updates the progress of the litigation.

On October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling order continuing the hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants George Farley and AMC to December 14, 2018.

The October 16, 2018 order also required the company to increase its bond amount by an additional $185,301.86 ($80,301.86 for AMC and $105,000.00 for Mr. Farley) to account for the continued hearing date. On October 24, 2018, the company posted the additional bond amount of $185,301.86.

On October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order denying the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.

On January 23, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a Memorandum Opinion, granting a preliminary injunction prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock, which the company alleges were improperly issued. On January 24, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a revised Memorandum Opinion correcting calculations regarding the increased bond amount.

In granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. Specifically, the Court found it was “reasonably probable” Mr. Farley had unlawfully issued the 25 million shares without proper authorization, Mr. Farley had breached his duty of loyalty to the company, Mr. Farley was unlikely to prove the stock issuance was procedurally or substantively “fair” to the company, and Mr. Farley had fraudulently transferred 20 million of the shares to AMC. Finally, the Court ruled because Farley and AMC’s 25 million shares represented approximately one eighth of the company’s outstanding ownership, the injunction was necessary to protect the company’s capital structure, ability to attract new investors, ability to raise new capital and continue deployment of its plans now underway to revitalize its business.

In its Memorandum Opinion, the Court also required that the company post additional bond money, bringing the total cash collateral for the surety agreement to $582,377.26. The company posted the additional bond amount, and deposited the additional cash amount with the surety, on January 29, 2019.

On March 4, 2019, the company filed an amended complaint adding claims against Mr. Farley concerning loans Mr. Farley caused the company take from PowerUp Lending Group Ltd. and Auctus Fund LLC from September 2017 through March 2018. Mr. Farley responded to the amended complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit based on Delaware Court of Chancery Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(7). On September 28, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court denied this motion.

On July 7, 2019, the company filed a motion to reduce or eliminate the cash bond requirement. As previously reported, the cash bond was required by the Delaware Chancery Court. On September 30, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court denied the motion.

On July 19, 2019, Mr. Farley and AMC filed answers and amended counter claims in response to the Company’s amended complaint. The amended counter claims add claims under Delaware General Corporate Law section 205, seeking to validate the stock issuances at issue in the litigation.

On July 29, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a scheduling order which, among other deadlines, rescheduled the trial date to begin on January 21, 2020. However, recently the judge presiding in the case, Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves, was appointed and confirmed to the Delaware Supreme Court. Though no formal order has yet issued, the company expects the trial date to be postponed to mid-2020.

On September 26, 2019, the company filed a motion for partial summary judgment concerning the issuance of company stock to Mr. Farley without having been authorized by a quorum of the board of directors. The previous hearing date of November 20, 2019, was postponed while the case awaited a new judge assignment.


The case was reassigned to Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster. On January 14, 2020, Vice Chancellor Laster held a scheduling conference. On January 29, 2020, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a scheduling order setting the trial date for July 20, 2020.

In a related matter, on February 8, 2019, the company filed a complaint against Stein Riso Mantel McDonough, LLP (“Stein Riso”), its former counsel, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging the following:

1. breach of fiduciary duty;

2. legal malpractice;

3. aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty;

4. voidance of fees under New York Rules of Professional Conduct 1.8;

5. violation of New York Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5;

6. securities fraud;

7. breach of contract; and

8. unjust enrichment.

The complaint against Stein Riso followed the issuance, on January 23, 2019, of a Memorandum Opinion granting the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction by the Delaware Court of Chancery in the case against George Farley and AMC. Stein Riso has responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company amended its complaint in response. On July 31, 2019, Stein Riso responded to the company’s amended complaint by filing another motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company filed an opposition to this motion on August 14, 2019. Stein Riso filed a reply brief on September 13, 2019. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the motion.

On July 3, 2019, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and its partner, Ryan Whalen counsel for defendants, George Farley and AnneMarie Co. LLC,filed a complaint in the litigation brought by the company and pending in Delaware, filed a claim in theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the company, its directors, officers, attorneys and a consultant. The action allegesalleged libel, securities fraud and related claims. The company believes that this suit lacks merit and intends to dispute these allegations. The company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on October 24, 2019. On December 13, 2019, Gusrae Kaplan and Mr. Whalen filed an opposition to the Company’scompany’s motion. On January 10, 2020, the company filed a reply brief. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the motion. On August 5, 2021, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of the action without prejudice.

 

On September 24, 2019,January 15, 2021, the company filed a complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of Common PleasNew York, against Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and Ryan Whalen for malpractice and breach of New York Rules of Professional Conduct by both parties as former counsel to the company. On May 28, 2021, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 25, 2021, the company filed an opposition to the motion. On July 13, 2021, Gusrae Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed their reply brief. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the motion.

On September 7, 2021, Gusrae Kaplan & Nusbaum and its partner Ryan Whalen filed a complaint in the CountyNew York Supreme Court against the company, its directors, officers, attorneys and a consultant, alleging a single claim for defamation per se based on the same conduct underlying their claim of Beaufort, South Carolina,libel in their voluntarily dismissed federal court action. The company filed a motion to preventdismiss the sale of certain property located there (or incomplaint on October 29, 2021, which motion included a request for sanctions for filing a frivolous complaint. Gusrae Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed their opposition to the alternative,company’s motion to require payment of proceeds from any sale ofdismiss on January 13, 2022. The company filed its reply brief on February 17, 2022. The court has not yet ruled on the property intomotion. On March 9, 2022, the registry ofcompany received notice that the court until a final decision is entered inhad scheduled oral arguments on the matter), in ordermotion to protect the company from having property disposed of. Effective January 8, 2020, this complaint was dismissed.dismiss for May 23, 2022.

 

As with any litigation, the company cannot predict the outcome with certainty, but the company expects to provide further updates on the status of the litigation as circumstances warrant.

 

WeThe company may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

 

13


 

 

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Market Information and Holders

 

Our common stock is currently quoted for trading on the OTCQB Market, trading under the symbol “AERG”. On March 26, 2020,30, 2022, the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB Market was $0.26.$2.40. Over-the-counter market quotations, such as on the OTCQB, reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 

As of March 26, 2020,30, 2022, there were approximately 375389 holders of record of Applied Energetics’ common stock.

 

Unregistered Sale of Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

InThe company has reported all information pertaining to all issuances of equity securities sold during the last quarter of 2019, the company received $704,000 from two non-affiliated individuals basedperiod covered by this Annual Report on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 2,347,000 shares of its common stock.Form 10-K in previously filed report on Forms 10-Q and 8-K.

 

In October, 2019, the company issued 25,000 shares of its common stock as compensation to a non-affiliated individual.Dividends

 

In January 2020, the company received $603,000 from five non-affiliated individuals based on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 2,010,000 shares of its common stock.

In January 2020, the company issued 25,000 shares in response to a non-affiliated warrant holder exercising a warrant.

In February 2020, the company received $510,000 from a non-affiliated individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,700,000 shares of its common stock.

Each of the foregoing issuance were pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as they were not in connection with a public offering.

Dividends

Dividends on our Preferred Stock are payable quarterly on the first day of February, May, August and November, in cash or shares of Common Stock. We paid dividends via the issuance shares of Common Stock on our 6.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in 2011. We paid cash dividends on our 6.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in 2012 and February and May 2013. The company has not paid the dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1, 2013. Dividend arrearagesdue as of December 31, 20192021 and February 1, 202028, 2022 were approximately $221,000$295,000 and $230,000,$298,000, respectively. Our Board of Directors suspended the declaration of the dividend, commencing with the dividend payable as of February 1, 2015 sincebecause we did not have a surplus (as such term is defined in the Delaware general corporationGeneral Corporation Law) as of December 31, 2014,2014. The Board anticipates continuing such suspension until such time as we have a surplus, or net profitsprofit, for a fiscal year.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

See Item 12.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

 

14

ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

You should read the following management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) together with the risk factors set forth in Item 1A and with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

 

Overview

 

StartingApplied Energetics, Inc., specializes in the fourth quarterdevelopment and manufacture of 2014advanced high-performance lasers, high voltage electronics, advanced optical systems, and through the first quarter of 2017, the company reportedintegrated guided energy systems for prospective defense, national security, industrial, and scientific customers worldwide.

Gregory J. Quarles serves as a “shell company” as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended due to the suspension of its previous business activities in October, 2014. The company has developed a comprehensive researchour President and development programChief Executive officer and, commenced R&D Activities in April 2017. Accordingly, the company is no longer a “shell company” and is reporting as a “smaller reporting company”.

In 2017, AERG reactivated its previous business activities pursuant to Teaming and Consulting Agreementsa consulting agreement with (i) Applied Optical Sciences, Inc. (“AOS”), (ii)an LLC wholly owned by him, Dr. Stephen W. McCahon Ph.D., one of the company’s founders, a significant stockholder of the company and owner of AOS, who was primarily responsible for development of the company’s existing Intellectual Property portfolio, and (iii) each of the members of the Scientific Advisory Board. The Teaming and Consulting Agreements with AOS and McCahon were superseded by the Asset Purchase Agreement and Consulting Agreement described below.

Effective April 29, 2019, Applied Energetics established a Board of Advisors to work with its Board of Directors and key management personnel on specific areas of significance to the company. Applied Energetics appointed Christopher “Chris” Donaghey as its first member. Chris comes highly qualified and is familiar with Applied Energetics and its key technologies. We expect Chris to have significant input into the strategic direction of the company and provide assistance in building lasting relationships in our defense markets.

Mr. Donaghey currently serves as the senior vice president and head of corporate development for Scientific Applications International Corporation (“SAIC”), a $6.5 billion revenue defense and government agency technology integrator. As an executive of SAIC, Donaghey works closely with SAIC’s senior management to support the development and implementation of SAIC’s strategic plan with an emphasis on M&A to complement organic growth strategies and value creation.

Gregory J. Quarles was hired as the Chief Executive officer of AERG at the beginning of May 2019, and shortly thereafter, the company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with AOS on May 29, 2019. AOS is a Tucson-based corporation of which Stephen W. McCahon is the majority shareholder. Mr. McCahon was also retained under a Consulting Agreement with AERG and has been retained as the actingour Chief Scientist. AERG has continued to expand its technical capabilities with the addition of numerousemployees, consultants and contractors, and agreements with several of the leading laser and optics universities in the country. The Asset Purchase Agreementteam at Applied Energetics continued to expand during the third and Consulting Agreement supersededfourth quarters of 2021 and early 2022, with the 2017 Teamingaddition of two new full-time employees (one, a laser technician and Consulting Agreements with AOSthe other a junior scientist and McCahon.in-house counsel as well as retention of world-class contractors to strengthen our human resources, compliance, public relations, IT, and technical staff supporting the research and development in the laboratory.

 

AERG owns intellectual property that is integral and necessary for the development of Ultra-ShortUltrashort Pulse (“USP”USP™”) Lasers, Laser Guided Energy (“LGE”LGE®) and Direct Discharge Electrical products for military and commercial applications. AERG currently owns 26 patents and an additional 11 Government Sensitive Patent Applications (“GSPA”). These GSPA’s are held under secrecy orders of the US government and allow the company greatly extended protection rights, including having no expiration date until such time as they are no longer classified after that they will have the normal 20-year patent protection. The company also has seven provisional patents, and we continue to file patent applications as we deem appropriate.

 


On December 26, 2019,

We submitted multiple proposals to various government agencies in 2020 and 2021. Due to the closures of multiple agencies and work-from-home orders across various regions of the United States, reviews and funding decisions on these proposals were delayed longer than anticipated as resources were focused on other matters within the government. AERG has received notificationmultiple notices from government agencies stating that “the vast number of proposals received, and the Armychallenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic have impacted the Government’s evaluation timelines.” Several of the government agencies that ithave received and are reviewing our proposals started to open their facilities to limited off-site briefings starting on June 1, 2021. Since that date, AERG’s team has been competitively selected for award of a Phase I Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) contract. The award is for the development of Standoff Electronic Denial systems The objective of this award isinvited to, develop a directed energy system capable of disrupting, disabling or destroying the electronicsand completed, multiple briefings focused on a remote target within milliseconds of detection.our capabilities and our submissions. This award was successfully negotiated and the contract was executed with a March 4, 2020 start date. The first phase of the program will be completedpositive action by June 5, 2020.

The proposal submitted to the Army STTR program was one of several proposals submitted in 2019. We are awaiting feedback on these subsequent submissions, but recognize that our feedback from the agencies could be delayed dueimpacted by the new Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of the SARS-CoV-2 strain. The Federal government is currently evaluating the possibility of reducing staff sizes in the offices and closing off all external visitors unless the meetings are deemed critical by the agency. Effective August 2, 2021, the DOD re-enforced a maximum telework position for their employees and contractors and reduced the on-site occupancy to less than 50% of the normal occupancy. As the Delta variant increased, the DOD maintained the maximum telework policy and on September 9, 2021 reduced the maximum on-site occupancy to less than 40% of normal work occupancy. Further restrictions were announced on January 6, 2022, with maximum occupancy of facilities dropping to 25%, and a majority of workers teleworking, but in March 2022, the DOD has announced that occupancy is back to 50% except in certain circumstances. These recent changes have again further hampered the ability of the AERG team to schedule on-site briefings for our proposals undergoing review.

In addition to these review-based delays, the US federal budget for 2022 was not approved by Congress by the October 1, 2021, start of the U.S. federal government fiscal year. On September 21, 2021, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 5305, and on September 30, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the same bill, a continuing resolution (CR) to extend federal government funding through December 3, 2021, and the President signed it into law (Public Law 117-43) on September 30, 2021 to avoid a government shutdown at the end of the fiscal year 2021. A second CR was signed into law on December 2, 2021, extending funded operations through February 18, 2022. And most recently, a third CR was signed on February 17, 2022, extending funding through March 11, 2022. The final appropriations bill was signed into law by President Biden on the night of March 11, 2022, and includes increases in areas of particular interest to the impact the corona virus is having on workplaces in all sectors. These delays could impact feedback, reviews and announcements of awards over the next several months. We could also experience delays in briefing the various stakeholders, funding agencies, collaborators and possible system integrators and partners across the defense and manufacturing markets. At this time, we cannot predict when we will learn more about our submissions.company.

 

In May 2021, we moved into our new headquarters consisting of approximately 13,000 rentable square feet of office, laboratory and production space located at the University of Arizona Tech Park, a research and technology park owned and operated by the University of Arizona. This has enabled us to consolidate our offices and expand our R&D capacity with a Class 1000 (ISO Class 6) “clean room” and other turnkey laboratory and conference features. We have consolidated from our two previous locations and now have our management and scientific teams under one roof. We also hosted our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the large University of Arizona Tech Park Conference Center, which provided the necessary equipment and refreshments. Attendees at the meeting received tours of the tech park grounds. We entered into the Lease Agreement for the space, effective March 15, 2021, with Campus Research Corporation. The lease term began May 1, 2021, and ends on April 30, 2026. The base rent is $6.7626 per rentable square foot for year one, and escalates to $9.2009 in year two, $11.4806 in year three, $13.1740 in year four and $14.9306 in year five, plus certain operating expenses and taxes.

On April 28, 2020, AERG was awarded a loan for $132,760 through the Small Business Administration (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). The terms of this loan were twenty-four months with a 1% annual interest rate. These funds were issued to cover payroll costs over 8 weeks of May and June 2020. Through the utilization of this PPP loan, AERG was able to keep all employees fully engaged during these two months of the pandemic. Having followed the guidelines set forth by the SBA on the PPP program, we received a waiver which allowed for the conversion of $80,593.55 of the loan to a grant. Since then, we have been repaying the balance of the loan in monthly installments at the 1% annual interest rate. As of December 31, 2021, $22,804 in principal and $1,385 in interest remained outstanding, and we expect to repay the remaining balance in April 2022.


 

 

Path ForwardStrategic Plan and Analysis

 

Our goal with the AERG Strategic Plan is to increase the energy, peak power and frequency agility of USP optical sources while decreasing the size, weight, and cost of these systems. We expect to developare in the process of developing this breadth of very high peak power USP lasers and additional optical sources that have a very broad range of applicability for threat disruption for the Department of Defense, the intelligence community, and for commercial, biomedical, space and medicalnational intelligence applications. Although the historical market for AERG’s LGE and USP technology is the U.S. Government, thederivatives of these USP technologies is expected tocould provide numerousfuture platforms for commercial additive and subtractive manufacturing and medical device and imaging markets, creating a substantially larger dual-use market for our products to address.address once testing, evaluation and integration have been completed in partnerships with the user community. During 2020, the AERG team was able to develop partnership and teaming arrangements with the three leading laser and optics institutes in the United States, namely, the University of Arizona, the University of Central Florida, and the University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics. Our desire is to work on programs jointly where the strengths of each organization can assist in escalating knowledge and delivery of systems to the government sponsors, and to train the next generation of scientists and engineers to work in the Directed Energy fields.

 

As mentioned elsewhere herein, the ongoingThe Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic presents uniquecontinues to present risks and uncertainties that may alter or otherwise affect our path forward. OurAlthough the virus seemed to be waning in the fall of 2021, the onslaught of the Omicron variant brought about a new wave that saw the seven-day moving average of new cases peak at around 466,000 during the winter of 2021-22. This variant, which presented with less severe symptoms on average than those before it, seems now to have receded. However, it is impossible to be certain whether a new variant will arise, its level of infectiousness and severity, and how it will affect commerce and our economy. Accordingly, our management continues to monitor the possible effects of the coronavirus pandemicvirus on the execution of our plan of operations, our prospective contracts, and the availability of financing to fund our strategic and operational plans going forward. We attempt to follow the most current advice and guidance to minimize the risk of infection to our employees and follow any applicable federal guidelines.

 

Despite the challenges posed by COVID-19, we have continued to execute our business development plans, further our research and development program and submit proposals for grants and contracts. During the past two fiscal years, we submitted multiple proposals and have been engaged in meetings on a daily and weekly basis with various agencies and departments both remotely and in person in Washington, DC and at various other government facilities. Dr. Quarles, our President and CEO, has traveled to DC on multiple occasions during the pandemic in 2020 and 2021 and currently in 2022 and remains committed to pursuing this business even in these challenging times. The interest in our technology and applications remains high, and we continue to submit proposals for all appropriate opportunities and share our vision of the disruptive capabilities of USP optical sources for both near- and far-term threats and dual-use commercial applications.

Through our analysis of the market, and in discussions with potential customers, we would also conclude that customers are becoming more receptive and interested in directed energy technologies. According to the Department of Defense fiscal 2019 budget, its directed energy spending grew from approximately $500 million in 2017 to over $1 billion in 2019, an increase of 100%. The 2020 budget reflected directed energy spending of $1.2 billion, an additional increase of 20% over 2019, and from 2017 through 2020, the directed energy budget grew from approximately $500 million to approximately $1.2 billion, averaging approximately 40% per year. The government has allocated $1.4 billion for various directed energy programs in 2021, and it has been anticipated to exceed $10.1 billion by 2026. The DOD budget for directed energy was essentially flat between 2021 and 2022, approaching $1.2 billion for each year. As a result, we continue to be even more optimistic about our future and the growing opportunities in directed energy applications. The AERG team anticipates a continuation of strong funding for the Directed Energy community. With our existing patent portfolio, and through further advancements of our technologies, we believe we have the substantial building blocks needed to become a significant and successful developer in our USP™ and LGE® marketplaces. 


Critical Accounting Policies

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its assumptions on historical experiences and on various other inputs and estimates that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. In addition, management considers the basis and methodology used in developing and selecting these estimates, the trends in and amounts of these estimates, specific matters affecting the amount of and changes in these estimates, and any other relevant matters related to these estimates, including significant issues concerning accounting principles and financial statement presentation. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known which could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein.

 

Share-Based Payments

 

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period.

 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. We make the following assumptions relative to this model: (i) the annual dividend yield is zero as we do not pay dividends on our common stock, (ii) the weighted-average expected life is based on a midpoint scenario, where the expected life is determined to be half of the time from grant to expiration, regardless of vesting, (iii) the risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury security rate for the expected life, and (iv) the volatility is based on the level of fluctuations in our historical share price for a period equal to the weighted-average expected life. We estimate forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and adjust this estimate over the requisite service period should actual forfeitures differ from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change and which impacts the amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.

 

Income Taxes

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized currently for the future tax consequences attributable to the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized.


Results of Operations

 

Our consolidated financial information for the years ending December 31, 2019,2021, and 20182020 is as follows:

  2019  2018 
Revenue $-  $- 
Cost of revenue  -   - 
Operating Expenses:        
General and administrative $(4,622,624) $(2,521,837)
Selling and marketing  (213,738)  (50,085)
Research and development  (335,445)  (190,482)
Total operating expenses  (5,171,807)  (2,762,404)
Other expense:        
Other income  19,046   - 
Interest (expense)  (403,578)  (245,343)
Other expense  (384,532)  (245,343)
Loss before provision for  income taxes  (5,556,339)  (3,007,747)
Provision for income taxes  -   - 
Net loss $(5,556,339) $(3,007,747)

 

  2021  2020 
Revenue $-  $175,920 
Cost of revenue  -   (153,630)
Gross profit  -   22,290 
Operating Expenses:        
General and administrative  (4,903,081)  (4,698,624)
Selling and marketing  (317,350)  (296,461)
Research and development  (281,896)  (266,864)
Total operating expenses  (5,502,327)  (5,261,949)
Other income/(expense):        
Other income  81,218   15,832 
Gain on settlement  -   3,206,000 
Interest (expense)  (4,344)  (1,212,667)
Other income/(expense)  76,874   2,009,165 
Loss before provision for income taxes  (5,425,453)  (3,230,494)
Provision for income taxes  -   - 
Net loss $(5,425,453) $(3,230,494)

Revenue

Revenue decreased approximately $176,000 to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $176,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to the completion of an STTR phase I project during 2020.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue decreased approximately $154,000 to $0 for year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $154,000 for year ended December 31, 2020, primarily due to the completion of an STTR phase I project.

General and Administrative

 

General and administrative expenses increased approximately $2,101,000$204,000 to $4,623,000$4,903,000 for the year ended December 31, 20192021, compared to $2,522,000$4,699,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018. Consulting and professional services increased2020, primarily due to the $154,000 in applied project costs in 2020, increases in building costs by approximately $1,881,000,$278,000, wages and employee benefits increased $225,000,of $90,000, supplies and insurance increased by $60,000,of $22,000, travel increased by $52,000, building costs increased by $41,000 and depreciation increased by $15,000,of $14,000, partially offset by recognition of a loss on the early payoff of notes payable for $174,000decrease in 2018.consulting and professional services by approximately $356,000.

 

Selling and Marketing

 

Selling and Marketing expenses increased approximately $164,000$21,000 to $214,000$317,000 for the year ended December 31, 20192021, compared to $50,000$296,000 for the year ended December 31, 20182020, primarily due to the continuation of business development activities through our Master Services Agreement with Westpark Advisors.Advisors as well as the addition of other consultants in this field.

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses increased approximately $145,000$15,000 to $335,000$282,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, compared to $190,000$267,000 the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, primarily due to the initiationadditional labor being performed on our Internal Research and Development project, partially offset by the allocation of part of management’s pay from research and development activities through our teaming agreement with Applied Optical Sciences, Inc.and our cooperative Research Agreement with the Arizona Board of Regents of the University of Arizona.to consulting expense.

 


Other Expense

 

Interest expenseOther income/(expense) decreased approximately $1,932,000 to $77,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 was higher2021, compared to $2,009,000 for the year ended December 31. 2020, primarily due to the company receiving $3,206,000 in a litigation settlement during 2020. Interest expense decreased by approximately $158,000$1,208,000 to $404,000$4,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, compared to $245,000$1,213,000 for the year ended December 31, 20182020 primarily due to warrant expense of $263,000 partially offset by the amortization of the notesnote’s payable beneficial conversion factor and higher levels of historical debt in 2018.feature. Other income increased $19,000approximately $65,000 to $19,000$81,000 for the year ended 2021, compared to reflect$16,000 for the time and effort onyear ended December 31, 2020 primarily due the subcontract to the Missile Defense Agency (thru AlionSciences) as a subject matter expert on a series of program reviews.CARES Act PPP Loan forgiveness for $81,000.

 

Net Loss

 

Our operations in 20192021 resulted in a net loss of approximately $5,556,000, an increase$5,425,000, a decrease of approximately $2,549,000$2,195,000 compared to the approximately $3,008,000 million$3,230,000 net loss for 20182020 primarily due to the receipt of a ligation settlement, a decrease in consulting and professional services and applied project costs, partially offset by an increase due to the recognition of a beneficial conversion feature, increases in professional fees,employee wages and employee benefits, building costs and supplies and insurance, travel, building costs, depreciation, selling and marketing, partially offset by a reduction offset by recognition of a loss on the early payoff of notes payable 2018 and a lower other expense.marketing. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders per common share – basic and diluted increaseddecreased to approximately ($0.03) per share.

 

17Trend Discussion

 

Trend Discussion

There are obvious costs associated with restarting the corporation and acquiring the skilled leadership and manpower to execute on new product development, as is visible in the higher year-over-year expenses recognized in this Result of Operations. It appears with the year-endearly 2021 contract announcement,booking and the anticipated bookings in 2020,combination of the government slow-down due to COVID-19 impacts that ourit is too early to determine if efforts to obtain new business under our Teaming and Consulting Agreements could be successful for the next fiscal year. The AERG team has expanded teaming arrangements in 2021, with agreements signed with the three most prominent optics and laser universities in the United States. This should provide greater visibility to government agencies looking for submissions with university/industry partnerships and research alignment.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Going Concern

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, the company incurred a net loss of approximately $5,556,000,$5,425,000, had negative cash flows from operations of $3,250,000approximately $3,214,000 and may incur additional future losses due to the reduction in governmentGovernment contract activity. These mattersAt December 31, 2021, the Company had total current assets of approximately $3,706,000 and total current liabilities of approximately $1,416,000 resulting in working capital of approximately $2,290,000. At December 31, 2021, the Company had cash of approximately $3,663,000.

Based on the Company’s current business plan, it believes its cash balance as of the date of this filing will be sufficient to meet its anticipated cash requirements for the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurance that the current business plan will be achievable. Such conditions raise substantial doubt as todoubts about the company’sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern.

In their report accompanying ourconcern for one year from the date the financial statements our independent auditors stated that our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were prepared assuming that we would continue as a going concern, and that they have substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our auditors have noted that our recurring losses from operations and negative cash flow from operations and the concern that we may incur additional losses due to the reduction in Government contract activity raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.are issued.

 

The company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations. Management is devoting substantially all of its efforts to developing its business and raising capital and there can be no assurance that the company’s efforts will be successful. No assurance can be given that management’s actions will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its liquidity problems. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.  The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic contributes to this uncertainty.

 


In order to improve the company’s liquidity, the company’s management is actively pursuing additional equity financing through discussions with investment bankers and private investors. There can be no assurance that the company will be successful in its effort to secure additional equity financing.

 

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and the amount or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

AtAs of December 31, 2019,2021, we had approximately $88,000 of$3,663,000 cash and cash equivalents, a decreasean increase of approximately $90,000$339,000 from December 31, 2018.2020. In 2019,2021, we used approximately $3,250,000$3,214,000 in operating activities, comprised primarily of our net loss of $5,556,000,$5,425,000, a decrease in accruedprepaid expenses and compensationdeposits of $361,000, a decrease$60,000, an increase in accounts payable of $222,000,$43,000, an increase in long-term receivablesaccrued interest of $141,000,$1,000, an increase in accrued expenses of $21,000, partially offset by non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2,157,000, an increase in prepaid expenses and deposits of $217,000,$1,237,000, amortization of future compensation payable of $203,000, interest expense$833,000, amortization of $397,000, an increase in other receivablesprepaid assets of $57,000$157,000 and depreciation and amortization of $15,000.$20,000.

 

We used approximately $12,000 in investing activities with the purchase of equipment.

We had approximately $3,172,000$3,760,000 provided by financing activities comprised of proceeds from note payable net of financing costs of $2,350,000, $854,000$5,299,000 provided from the proceeds from the issuance of common stock and $108,000 provided from the proceeds from the exercise of warrants, partially offset by the repayment on notes payable $32,000.$1,647,000. All this resulted in a net cash outflowinflow of approximately $90,000.$3,760,000. There were no cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options during the year ended December 31, 2021.

 

As of March 26, 2020,30, 2022, our backlog (that is, workload remaining on signed contracts) was approximately $166,000.$-0- to be completed within the next twelve months.


As of March 30, 2022, the company had a cash balance of $2,750,000.

Contractual Obligations:

 

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2019:2021:

 

  Payment by Period 
  Total  Less than 1
Year
  1 to 3 Years 
          
Notes payable $4,967,890  $3,467,890  $1,500,000 
Due to affiliate  50,000   50,000  $- 
Operating leases  4,066   4,066   - 
             
Total $5,021,957  $3,521,957  $1,500,000 
  Payment by Period 
  Total  Less than 1 Year  1 to 5 Years 
          
Notes payable $1,024,000  $1,024,000  $- 
Due to affiliate  50,000   50,000   - 
Leases  583,000   76,000   507,000 
Total $1,657,000  $1,150,000  $507,000 

 

Not included in theThe above table aredoes not include the dividends on our Series A Preferred StockStock. Assuming that are approximately $34,000 each year (approximately $9,000 each quarter), assumingthere is no conversion of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock into shares of common stock.stock, the dividends are approximately $34,000 each year (approximately $9,000 each quarter).

 

Operating Leases

 

We areIn March 2021, the Company signed a five-year lease for a 11,000 square foot laboratory/office space in Tucson. The lease term commences May 1, 2021 and ends on April 30, 2026. The base rent is $6.7626 per rentable square foot for year one, and escalates to $9.2009 in year two, $11.4806 in year three, $13.1740 in year four and $14.9306 in year five, plus certain operating in leased premises under month-to-month operating leases. Total rent expense on these spaces amounted to approximately $30,000 for 2019expenses and $4,000 for 2018. The increase in lease expenses is due to the lease of the lab space transitioned in the AOS asset acquisition.taxes.

 


Preferred Stock

 

The Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock bears dividends at an initial rate of 6.5% of the liquidation preference per share per annum, which accrues from the date of issuance, and is payable quarterly. We have not paid dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1, 2013 and, as a result, the dividend rate has increased to 10% per annum and will remain at that level until such failure is cured. Dividends in arrearsdue as of December 31, 2021, and February 1, 202028, 2022, were approximately $230,000.$295,000 and $298,000, respectively.

 

The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have a right to put the stock to the company for an aggregate amount equal to the liquidation preference (approximately $340,000) plus unpaid dividends of $221,000$295,000, as of December 31, 2021, in the event of a change in control. Dividends are payable in: (i) cash, (ii) shares of our common stock (valued for such purpose at 95% of the weighted average of the last sales prices of our common stock for each of the trading days in the ten trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the applicable dividend payment date), provided that the issuance and/or resale of all such shares of our common stock are then covered by an effective registration statement or (iii) any combination of the foregoing. As of December 31, 2019,2021, there were 13,602 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting standards and pronouncements.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had no significant off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases. For a description of our operating lease, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.arrangements.


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

In the normal course of business, our financial position is subject to a variety of risks, such as the ability to collect our accounts receivable and the recoverability of the carrying values of our long-term assets. We do not presently enter into any transactions involving derivative financial instruments for risk management or other purposes.

 

Our available cash balances are deposited in bank demand deposit accounts. Substantially all of our cash flows are derived from our operations within the United States and today we are not subject to market risk associated with changes in foreign exchange rates.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

Our Consolidated Financial Statements, the related notes and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms thereon, are included in Applied Energetics’ 20192021 Consolidated Financial Statements and are filed as a part of this report on page F-1 following the signatures.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 


Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2019.2021. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its chief executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designedwell-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2019.2021.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our chief executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the company’s assets;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the management and directors of the company; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Our management, including our Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officer (“CEO/PFO”), has conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2021, based on the framework established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO Framework). This assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. Based on our assessment under the criteria described above, the CEO/PFO has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2019.2021.

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal controls over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the SEC rules that permit smaller reporting companies to provide only management attestation in annual report on Form 10-K.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There has been no change in Applied Energetics’ internal control over financial reporting for the quarter ended December 31, 20192021, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Not Applicable

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.

Not Applicable


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The following is information with respect to our executive officers and directors:

 

Name Age Principal Position Director, Term expiring in
       
Bradford T. Adamczyk 5153 Director and Executive Chairman of the Board Three years
Gregory J Quarles 5860 Director, andPresident, Chief Executive Officer,
and Principal Financial Officer
 Three years
Jonathan R. Barcklow 3638 Director, Vice President and Secretary Two yearyears
John E. Schultz Jr. 6668 Director OneLess than one year
Mary P. O’Hara55Director, General Counsel and Chief Legal OfficerThree years
Stephen W. McCahon62Chief Scientist and ConsultantN/A

 

Messrs. Adamczyk and Barcklow joined the Boardboard in March 2018. Mr. Schultz joined the Boardboard in November 2018. Dr. Quarles joined the board in May 2019. Ms. O’Hara joined the board in August 2021. Dr. McCahon was retained as a consultant effective May 2019 and serves in such capacity as our Chief Scientist.

  

Bradford T. Adamczyk:Mr. Adamczyk was elected as the company’sCompany’s Chairman in May 2019.2019 and Executive Chairman in November 2022. He served as Principal Executive Officer from August 6, 2018, until becoming Chairman and was elected as a companyCompany director on March 8, 2018. Mr. Adamczyk has over 2025 years of experience in investments and financial analysis. Currently, he is the founder and portfolio manager ofHe founded MoriahStone Investment Management started in 2013. MoriahStone Investment Management specializes in both public equities and small-cap private companies. He has also served on the board of directors and as Chairmanadvisors of BroVo Spirits, LLC since 2014.2014, becoming its Chairman in 2018. Prior to founding MoriahStone, he was a senior securities analyst at Columbus Circle Investors in Stamford, CT, where he focused on technology investments, including software and the internet.investments. Mr. Adamczyk started his financial career at Morgan Stanley after receiving his MBA from the University of Michigan. He received his undergraduate degree from Western Michigan University, graduating Magna Cum Laude.

 

Gregory J Quarles: Dr. Quarles was elected as the company’sCompany’s Chief Executive Officer and as a companyCompany director effective May 4, 2019. In January 2021, the Board also elected him as President of the Company. Prior to that time, he had served on the company’sCompany’s Scientific Advisory Board since March 18, 2017. Before joining Applied Energetics, Dr. Quarles spent the previous six years with The Optical Society of America (“OSA”) in Washington D.C., both as a member of the Board Memberand the Executive Committee and more recently as the Chief Scientific Officer. His responsibilities at OSA encompassed a broad range of scientific, technical and engineering infrastructure, and included content development for the OSA meetings portfolio, along with many other related projects, highlighted by his reports to Congress. Moreover, Dr. Quarles had been personally involved through OSA in the establishment of many crucial partnerships involving major R&D laboratories and global agencies worldwide. This involvement included being a long-standing member of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, and Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee. In addition to his executive leadership, Dr. Quarles is a well-respected member of the laser development community globally with over 30 years of experience since the award of his Ph.D. from Oklahoma State University. He is a Fellow in both the SPIE and the IEEE Photonics Society and received the Memorial D.S. Rozhdestvensky Medal from the Russian Optical Society (2015). In 2016, he joined the Oklahoma State University CAS Hall of Fame, and in 1996 received the R&D 100 Award for the Ce:LiSAF Laser System.

 

Jonathan R. Barcklow:Mr. Barcklow was elected as the company’sCompany’s Vice President and Secretary on November 12, 2018, and was elected as a companyCompany director on March 8, 2018. Mr. Barcklow has over 1415 years of experience in advisory and management consulting services in federal defense and civilian agencies. He has spent his career in consulting services with both PriceWaterhouseCoopers and KPMG, LLP. Mr. Barcklow has worked forat KPMG since 2010 and currently serves as athe Managing Director within KPMG'sKPMG’s Federal Management Consulting group focused on providing Digital Innovation solutionsleading their Defense Mission Services portfolio. In leading this $30M portfolio, Mr. Barcklow is responsible for every facet of the businesses operations, management, profitability and overseeing the deliverygrowth planning and oversees a diverse workforce of large consulting solutions to Department of Defense clients.150 professionals Over his career, Mr. Barcklow has been a consultant for a number of federal agencies, including the Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Science Foundation, Department of the Navy, US Marine Corp, US Air Force, Defense Logistics Agency, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and the Deputy Chief Management Office. Over his career, his work hasHis portfolio primarily focused on large-scale strategic transformations, technology and innovation, including big data, advanced analytics, digital experience,AI and machine learning, blockchain, and Internet of Things (IoT), as well as financial management within DoD entities. Additionally, Mr. Barcklow helped drive the initial recapitalization efforts of Applied Energetics in 2018 and compliance.developed the initial 12-month execution plan for the Company’s turnaround. Mr. Barcklow graduated from the University of Virginia.

 


John E. Schultz Jr. EffectiveMr. Schultz was elected as a Company director on November 11, 2018, the board of directors of Applied Energetics appointed John E. Schultz Jr. to serve as a member of the board of directors, filling the vacancy created by the departure of Mr. Tom Dearmin.2018. Mr. Schultz bringshas had a long affiliation with Wall Street, starting with the Pacific Stock Exchange in the 1970’s, joining Cruttenden Co, the predecessor of Roth Capital in the early 1980’s, before foundinghaving founded CSG Spectra, Inc., a risk analytics firm, in 1984. Mr. SchultzHe also founded Oak Tree Asset Management Ltd. in 2000, andwhere he actively traded billions of dollars oftrades securities in managed LLC’s during the early 2000’s. More recently,LLC’s. Mr. Schultz’s strong networks have emphasized outside the boxoutside-the-box investment opportunities and early stageearly-stage new frontier private equity investment deals. Mr. Schultz has been a shareholder and friend of Applied Energetics since its public inception in 2004, and has an intimate knowledge of the company’s background,Applied Energetics, including its history and financials. Mr. Schultzfinancials and has more recentlyin the past served as a consultant to the company.Company. Mr. Schultz is a graduate of California State University at Long Beach.

 

22Mary P. O’Hara Ms. O’Hara was appointed to the Board of Directors on August 20, 2021, upon the board’s decision to expand its number to five members. She has been in private law practice for over thirty years and has broad experience in all facets of securities, corporate and commercial law. She is currently affiliated with the law firm of Masur, Griffitts, Avidor, LLP and has represented the Company for several years. Previously, she was a partner at Hodgson Russ LLP and an associate at Fulbright & Jaworski LLP (now known as Norton Rose Fulbright) and Mayer Brown & Platt, LLP (now known as Mayer Brown LLP). Ms. O’Hara has a J.D. from New York University School of Law and B.A. in Economics, magna cum laude, from the University of New Mexico.

 

Stephen W. McCahon Dr. Stephen McCahon has been a scientific researcher, technology developer, and entrepreneur for over 30 years. He has co-authored more than 50 scientific publications and has more than 30 patents issued, patents pending, or invention disclosures in preparation for patent submission. He was a Member of the Research Staff in the Optical Physics Department at the Hughes Research Laboratory in Malibu, California from 1986 to 1996 performing basic research in the area of optical physics and non-linear optical materials. In 1996, Dr. McCahon moved to Raytheon (Hughes) Missile Systems Co, in Tucson, AZ during which time as was significantly responsible for the successful creation and development of the Directed Energy Weapons Product Line and served as its Chief Scientist. He left Raytheon in 2002 to co-found Applied Energetics Inc. in Tucson, AZ to develop Directed Energy Weapons for the DoD including very high energy and average power USP laser sources and Laser Guided Energy Technologies. In April 2010 Dr. McCahon left Applied Energetics to form Applied Optical Sciences where he developed technologies related to the application of optical physics to a broad range of areas, including photonics and USP laser development. Dr. McCahon is a graduate the University of Southern California (BSEE, MSEE) holds a Ph.D., Photonics, Inter-disciplinary Physics and Electrical Engineering from the University of Iowa. Since February 2016, he has served as a consultant to the Applied Energetics Board of Directors. In 2019 Applied Energetics purchased his company Applied Optical Sciences and integrated it into Applied Energetics where Dr. McCahon currently serves as its Chief Scientist.

Directors Qualifications, Experience and Skills

 

Our directors bring to our Board a wealth of executive leadership experience and technical knowledge derived from histheir service, respectively, as senior executive and, in many cases,executives, founders of industry and legal or knowledge specific consulting firms or operational businesses. They also offer extensive public company board experience.financial professionals. Our board members hashave demonstrated strong business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment and has a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to ethical standards. When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board of Directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the company’sCompany’s business and structure, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the Directors’ individual biographies set forth above and the specific individual qualifications, experience and skills as described below:

 

Mr. Adamczyk’s qualifications as a director include his expertise in corporate finance and his experience working with other companies to overcome near-term financial or strategic challenges. Mr. Adamczyk was part of the team that led the 2018 proxy of AERG, establishing a new company board and management team and recapitalizing the Company to pursue the development of its technology and IP portfolio. He, along with the others in this group, continues his work to establish a foundation of good corporate governance and transparency.

Dr. Quarles’Quarles’s qualifications as a director include his experience as director and senior executive in the laser industry with primary focus on the defense and aerospace sector. He currently, or has in the past, served on eight different boards that span the materials, security, defense, optics and photonics industries.


Mr. Barcklow’s qualifications as a director include his experience in management consulting and his knowledge of the defense industry and government contracting. Mr. Barcklow was part of the team that led the 2018 proxy, establishing a new company board and management team and recapitalizing the company to pursue the development of its technology and IP portfolio. He, along with the others in this group, continues his work to establish a foundation of good corporate governance and transparency.

Mr. Schultz’Schultz’s qualifications as a director include his expertise in the equity investment industry and has been a friend of Applied Energetics since its public inception in 2004, and has an intimate knowledge of the company’s background, including its history and financials. Mr. Schultz has more recently servedand his entity Oak Tree Asset Management were part of the team that led the 2018 proxy, establishing a new company board and management team and recapitalizing the company to pursue the development of its technology and IP portfolio. He, along with the others in this group, continues his work to establish a foundation of good corporate governance and transparency.

Ms. O’Hara’s qualifications as a consultant todirector include her many years of experience in securities, corporate and commercial law and the company.business and financial knowledge she has acquired over those years as well.

 

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires certain officers and directors of Applied Energetics, and any persons who own more than ten percent of the common stock outstanding to file forms reporting their initial beneficial ownership of shares and subsequent changes in that ownership with the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market.SEC. Officers and directors of Applied Energetics, and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are also required to furnish us with copies of all such Section 16(a) forms they file. None of our officers or directors failed to file any Section 16(a) forms, however, Dr. Quarles was late in filing his Form 3.forms.

 

Code of Ethics

 

Applied Energetics has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of Applied Energetics’ employees and directors, including its chief executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Applied Energetics’ Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers all areas of professional conduct including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, disclosure obligations, insider trading, confidential information, as well as compliance with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to Applied Energetics’ business.

 

Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available at our website at http://aergs.com/news-and-events/, or upon request made to us in writing at the following address, and will be provided without charge:

 

Applied Energetics, Inc.

Attention: Compliance Officer

2480 West Ruthrauff9070 S. Rita Road, Suite 140 Q,1500

Tucson, AZ 8570585747

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

The members of the board of directors continue to evaluate the need and utility of establishing one or more committees of the Board of Directors and to review relevant legal or regulatory requirements with respect thereto. At present all functions that would be fulfilled by committees are being fulfilled by the entire board, and the board believes that currently no committees are necessary or legally required.

 

23


 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table discloses for the periods presented, the compensation for the personpersons who served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and our(and Principal Financial OfficerOfficer), Executive Chairman and Vice President and Secretary for the years ended December 31, 2019,2021 and 2018 (the “Named Executive”). George P. Farley was designated as our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer from March 2, 2016 to March 8, 2018. Thomas C Dearman was acting Chief Executive Officer from March 8, 2018 to August 8, 2018. Bradford T Adamczyk was Principal Executive Officer from August 6, 2018 to May 6, 2019.2020, Gregory J Quarles had been our Chief Executive Officer from May 6, 2019 to present.present and was elected President as of January 2021. Messrs. Adamczyk and Barcklow also receive compensation as directors as set forth under Director Compensation below.

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  All Other
Compensation (1)
  Total 
Bradford T. Adamczyk,  2021  $-  $-  $-  $   $- 
Executive Chairman  2020  $   $-  $            $   $-
Gregory J Quarles, President  2021  $304,167  $112,700  $-  $4,990  $421,857 
and Chief Executive Officer  2020  $250,000  $79,000  $   $62,683  $391,683 
Jonathan R. Barcklow,  2021  $-  $-  $-  $-  $  
Vice President and Secretary  2020  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Stephen McCahon,  2021  $250,000  $   $- $-  $250,000 
Chief Scientist  2020  $220,833  $-  $-  $-  $220,833 

 

Name and Principal Position Year Salary (1)  Stock
Awards (2)
  Total 
Bradford T. Adamczyk, 2019 $-  $-  $- 
Principal Executive Officer 2018 $-  $300,000  $300,000 
               
Gregory J Quarles,
Chief Executive Officer
 2019 $163,306  $1,650,000  $1,813,306 
               
Jonathan R. Barcklow, 2019 $-  $-  $- 
Vice President and Secretary 2018 $-  $300,000  $300,000 
               
George P Farley,
Former Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 2018 $-  $-  $- 
(1)In 2021, Dr. Quarles’ all other compensation was for group term life insurance and in 2020, Dr. Quarles’ all other compensation was for group term life insurance and tax gross up.

 

Director Compensation

The following table discloses our director compensation for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

Name Year  Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)(1)e
  All Other
compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
Bradford T. Adamczyk,  2021  $148,000  $   -  $-  $         -  $148,333 
Executive Chairman  2020  $135,000  $-  $-  $-  $135,000 
Jonathan R. Barcklow,  2021  $59,083  $-  $-  $-  $59,083 
Vice President and Secretary  2020  $46,000  $-  $-  $-  $46,000 
John E Schultz, Jr.  2021  $75,000  $-  $-  $-  $77,500 
   2020  $75,000  $-  $-  $-  $75,000 
Mary P. O’Hara,  2021  $-  $-  $215,877  $-  $215,877 
General Counsel and CLO  2020  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 

(1)Mr. Farley earned $12,500 per month for 2017, of which $45,000In August 2021, Ms. O’Hara was paid in 2017 and $24,500 was paid in 2018.
(2)In November 2018, Messrs. Adamczyk and Barcklow were each granted 5,000,000360,000 shares under options to purchase common stock under the 2018 Incentive Stock Plan. In May 2019, Mr. Quarles was granted 5,000,000 shares under options to purchase common stock.

 

GrantsBoard Considerations in Determining Salaries

During the fourth quarter of Plan-Based Awards2020, our Board of Directors retained Innovative Compensation and Benefits Concepts, LLC and its principal, Robert B. Jones, to gather the necessary data, including review of relevant company information, the level of work contributed by each director, and compensation levels among peer companies, and render two separate reports with recommendations on appropriate compensation levels for each member of our Board of Directors as well as our current and possible future executive officers. The Board considered these recommendations carefully before implementing the Board compensation and the amendments to Dr. Quarles’s Executive Employment Agreement. The Board periodically solicits input from Mr. Jones in making compensation decisions.

 

The following table disclosesvarious levels of compensation among members of the grantsBoard of Directors reflect the number of hours dedicated by each director and special assignments and projects undertaken by each on behalf of the company. Mr. Adamczyk’s compensation as Executive Chairman consists of a plan-based awardboard retainer of $150,000, and he receives an additional $65,000 for his assumption of capital and corporate finance and investor relations duties. Mr. Schultz’s compensation consists of a board retainer of $75,000, and he receives an additional $15,000 for his service intending to eachlegal affairs, accounting and information technology for the company. Mr. Barcklow’s compensation consists of the Named Executives in 2019:a board retainer of $75,000, and he receives an additional $35,000 for his service as Secretary, marketing and information technology.

 

Name Grant Date  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock
Awards (1)
 
Gregory J. Quarles 05/06/2019(2)  5,000,000  $0.35  $1,650,000 


 

(1)The amounts included in the “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards” column represent the full grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with ASC 718. The fair value of stock option awards is recognized in the income statement as non-cash, equity-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the grants. For a discussion of valuation assumptions, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of our 2019
(2)This option vests immediately with respect to 500,000 shares and in semi-annual installments with respect to the remaining 4,500,000 shares.

 

Employment Agreements for Named Executive Officers and Chief Scientist

 

We haveAs of April 18, 2019, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Dr. Gregory J Quarles setting forth the terms of his service as Chief Executive Officer. The agreement is for a term of three years and is renewable thereafter for sequential one-year periods. The agreement may be terminated by the company for “cause” or by Quarles for “Good Reason” both of which terms are defined in the agreement. The agreement may also be terminated, without cause or Good Reason, by either party upon sixty days’ written notice to the other.

 

The agreement calls for (i) a cash salary of $250,000 per annum, payable monthly, and eligibility for a discretionary bonus within 60 days of the end of each year, and (ii) options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. These options were issued pursuant to a grant agreement, dated as of April 18, 2019 and vest immediately with respect to 500,000 shares and in semi-annual installments with respect to the remaining 4,500,000 shares. The agreement also provides for Quarles to retain 2,000,000 options previously granted to him under a Consultant Stock Option Agreement in 2017, for his services on the Scientific Advisory Board, which are subject to vesting based on achievement of performance milestones. Dr. Quarles forfeited options to purchase an additional 1,500,000 shares under another prior option agreement. Under the agreement, Dr. Quarles also is to receive health and life insurance as well as other standard benefits. The agreement also requires the company to reimburse certain out-of-pocket expenses and to compensate Quarles in the event that it requires him to resign from certain boards on which he serves.


In the event of a termination of the agreement by Quarles with Good Reason, or by us without cause, we must pay him any unpaid base compensation due as of the termination date as well as any pro rata unpaid bonus and any unpaid expenses. Any unvested options will vest upon such termination. In such event, we must continue to pay Dr. Quarles his monthly base compensation and any health and life insurance benefits until he has secured full-time employment, but not to exceed a period of (i) twenty-four (24) months from the commencement date of the agreement or (ii) three months from the termination date, whichever is later.date.

 

In the event that we terminate the agreement for cause or he terminates without Good Reason, he will receive base compensation and expense reimbursement through the date of termination but will forfeit any unvested equity compensation.

 

This agreement was amended December 15, 2020, increasing Dr. Quarles’ salary to $300,000 per year effective January 1, 2021, and again on November 30, 2021, increasing his salary to $350,000 per year effective January 1, 2022.

Stephen W. McCahon serves as our Chief Scientist, pursuant to a Consulting Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2019 (the “SWM Consulting Agreement”), of which he is the principal. The SMW Consulting Agreement provides for a combination of cash and equity compensation for which Dr. McCahon leads Applied Energetics’ scientific efforts including: leading the scientific team, developing new intellectual property, assisting with business development, transferring legacy knowledge to new team members, recruiting and training talent, working with executives on corporate strategy, assisting in budget development for R&D, meeting with clients on technical concepts, attending conferences, and producing thought leadership for the Company. Dr. McCahon works closely with Dr. Quarles on the Company’s research and development activities and in the proposal and fulfilment of research and development contracts for branches of the Department of Defense, agencies of the federal government and other defense contractors and in other internal research and development activities relating to lasers and advanced optical sources.

The SWM Consulting Agreement provides for Mr. McCahon’s service to the Company for compensation consisting partly of cash of $180,000 for the first year and $250,000 during each of the second and third years of the term. Under the SWM Consulting Agreement, the Company also repurchased 5,000,000 shares if its common stock, issued to Dr. McCahon in 2016 under a prior Consulting Agreement, at a price of $0.06 per share based on the Company share price at the time of the SWM Consulting Agreement. 5,000,000 of an additional 15,000,000 shares held by Dr. McCahon are subject to a lock-up and released pro rata each month during the term of the agreement which may be accelerated in the event of termination other than for cause or a change in control. The term of the SWM Consulting Agreement began on June 1, 2019, and extends for a period of 36 months thereafter. Dr. McCahon is entitled to continue receiving cash compensation for three months following the date of any termination without cause by the Company.

Also, effective May 24, 2019, and in connection with the entry into the SWM Consulting Agreement, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Applied Optical Sciences, Inc. (“AOS”), an Arizona corporation of which Stephen W. McCahon is the majority stockholder. The Asset Purchase Agreement provided for purchase of specified assets from AOS, including principally intellectual property, contracts and equipment in exchange for consideration consisting of (i) cash in the amount of $2,500,000.00, payable in the form of a Promissory Note, secured by the assets, and (ii) warrants to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of Applied Energetics’ common stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share. The Promissory Note was amended in February 2021 to extend the maturity date by six months and restructure the payment to time up to the adjusted maturity date. The amendment also called for waiver of any late payment penalties for the first two payments.


Dr. McCahon is a significant stockholder of the Company. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table discloses unexercised options held by the named executives at December 31, 2019:2021:

 

Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable (#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable (#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
Gregory J. Quarles  500,000(1)  1,500,000  $0.05  02/28/2022
   1,250,000(2)  3,750,000  $0.35  04/18/2029
Jonathan R. Barcklow  2,000,000(3)  3,000,000  $0.07  11/12/2028
  Option Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
Gregory J. Quarles  2,000,000(1)  -  $0.05  03/28/2022
   4,250,000(2)  750,000  $0.35  04/18/2029
Jonathan R. Barcklow  5,000,000(3)  -  $0.07  11/12/2028

 

(1)This option was previously granted to Dr. Quarles under a Consultant Stock Option Agreement in 2017, for his services on the Scientific Advisory Board, which vested immediately with respect to 500,000 shares, up to an additional 250,000 shares upon achievement of the first $1 million in revenue, up to an additional 250,000 shares upon achievement of the next $2 million in revenues and up to an additional 1 million shares upon achievement of the next $5 million in revenues.

(2)These options vest immediately with respect to 500,000 shares and in six semi-annual installments of 750,000 shares with respect to the remaining 4,500,000 shares.

(3)The option granted to Mr. Barcklow vested immediately as to 1,800,000 shares and 200,000 shares per month thereafter through February of 2020. The two-part vesting schedule was first calculated monthly based on a start date of March 2018 when he became a director of the company. Additionally, with respect to 2,500,000 shares, the company must achieve certain milestones in the 20-day moving average share price of its common stock for the options to be exercisable. This option will be exercisable in the amount of 1,500,000 shares upon the 20-day moving average share price reaching $0.15 per share, 1,000,000 shares at $0.25 per share and 500,000 shares at $0.50 per share. A portion of Mr. BarcklowBarcklow’s board compensation reflects his services as Vice President and Secretary, but he does not receive a salarydirector compensation for his services.board service as set forth under Director Compensation.

 

In addition to the foregoing, as of December 31, 2021, Bradford T. Adamczyk, director and Chairman of the Board, held options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock, and John Schultz, a director, held options to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of common stock, each at an exercise price of $0.07 per share and both of which expire on November 12, 2028. Details regarding these options are set forth in Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters below.

Payments upon Termination or Change-In-Control

 

There are no termination or change in control agreements in place that would require payments.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION:

 

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,2021, none of our executive officers served on the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of any other company whose executive officers also serve on our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS:

 

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock, based on information provided by the persons named below in publicly available filings, as of April 1, 2019:March 29, 2022:

 

each of our directors and executive officers;

all directors and executive officers of ours as a group; and

each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is in care of Applied Energetics, 2480 W Ruthrauff9070 South Rita Road, Suite 140 Q,1500, Tucson, Arizona 85705.85747. Unless otherwise indicated, the company believes that all persons named in the following table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own.

 

For purposes of this table, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the securities if that person has the right to acquire such securities within 60 days of April 1, 2019March 29, 2022 upon the exercise of options or warrants. In determining the percentage ownership of the persons in the table below, we assumed in each case that the person exercised all options which are currently held by that person and which are exercisable within such 60 day60-day period, but that options and warrants held by all other persons were not exercised, and based the percentage ownership on 204,197,396207,692,878 shares outstanding on April 1, 2019.March 29, 2022.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned (1)
  Percentage of  Shares
Beneficially Owned (1)
 
       
Bradford T Adamczyk  6,735,081(2)  3.2%
Gregory J Quarles  1,250,000(3)  0.6%
Jonathon R Barcklow  5,500,000(4)  2.6%
John E Schultz Jr  4,122,624(5)  1.9%
Stephen W. McCahon  26,427,861(6)  12.6%
         
All directors and executive officers as a group (1 person)  17,607,705   7.9%
Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1)  Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned (1) 
       
Bradford T Adamczyk  7,235,081(2)  3.4%
Gregory J Quarles  7,000,000(3)  3.3%
Jonathan R Barcklow  6,000,000(4)  2.8%
John E Schultz Jr  4,372,624(5)  2.1%
Stephen W. McCahon  14,677,861(6)  7.0%
Mary P O’Hara  143,333(7)  *
Kevin T McFadden  12,100,000(8)  5.8%
         
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)  39,428,899   18.6%

 

*Less than one percent.

(1)(1)Computed based upon the total number of shares of common stock, restricted shares of common stock and shares of common stock underlying options or warrants held by that person that are exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date.

(2)(2)Based on information contained in a Form 4, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019.May 20, 2020. Includes 1,563,593 shares held by Moriah Stone Global L.P., which is controlled by Mr. Adamczyk. Also includes 5,000,000 shares underlying options. 3,500,000 of which are held in the name of the Adamczyk Family 2021 LLC.

(3)(3)Based on information known bycontained in a Form 3, filed with the companySEC on May 20, 2020.   Dr. Quarles has options to purchase up to 7,000,000 shares. Options to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock are vested as to 500,000 shares, the remaining 1,500,000 being subject to the Company achieving milestones for their vesting. Options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares are vested as to 2,750,000 shares, with the remaining 2,250,000 vesting in three six-month installments of 750,000 shares each beginning April 18, 2022.

(4)(4)Based on information contained in a Form 4, filed with the SEC on December 21, 2018. Includes 5,000,000 shares underlying options.

(5)(5)Based on information contained in a Form 3, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019.  Includes 500,000 shares held by Oak Tree Asset Management Ltd., which is controlled by Mr. Schultz, and 770,322 shares held by Mary Schultz, Mr. Schultz’s wife. Also includes 2,500,000 shares underlying options.

(6)(6)Based on information contained in a report onknown by the company and Dr. McCahon’s Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on February 24, 2017. 18, 2022.

(7)Based on information contained in a Form 4, filed with the SEC on January 6, 2022. Includes 1,000,000 shares underlying options.

(8)

Based on information known by the company and Mr. McCahon’sMcFadden’s Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on September 29, 2020. Includes a warrant to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock.  Mr. McFadden’s address is C/O Applied Optical Sciences, 4595 Palo Verde Rd. Suite 517, Tucson, Arizona 85714.21 Tow Path Lane South, Richmond, VA 23221.


Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table details information regarding our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019:2021:

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan category Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options
  Weighted-
average
exercise price
of outstanding
options
  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  20,150,000  $0.16   29,850,000 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders            
Total  20,150,000  $0.16   29,850,000 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

Plan category Number of
securities to
be issued
upon
exercise of
outstanding
options and
rights
  Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options
  Number of
securities
remaining
available
for future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  21,065,000  $0.21   28,935,000 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders            
Total  21,065,000  $0.21   28,935,000 

Effective November 12, 2018, the board of directors of Applied Energetics, Inc. adopted the 2018 Incentive Stock Plan. On October 30, 2019 the shareholders voted to approve and adopt the plan. The plan provides for the allocation and issuance of stock, restricted stock purchase offers and options (both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options) to officers, directors, employees and consultants of the company. The board reserved a total of 50,000,000 for possible issuance under the plan.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Transactions with Related Parties

 

Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer, stockholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

 

Contractual Relationships with Related Parties

Mary P. O’Hara, through her law firm, Masur Griffitts Avidor, LLP, serves as counsel to the Company, and provides securities, corporate, commercial and general legal services. The firm bills the Company monthly for such services, and such fees average approximately $22,000 per month.

Although the Company has not yet adopted formal policies and procedures with respect to related party transactions, the Board evaluates any such situation as it arises. In the case of Ms. O’Hara’s service as counsel as well as a board member, in accordance with Rule 1.7 of the New York Lawyer’s Rules of Professional Conduct and Note [35] thereto, the Board and Ms. O’Hara considered (i) the likelihood of a conflict of interest arising from her service, the potential intensity of any such conflict, the effect of her resignation if necessary, and the possibility of the Company obtaining legal advice from another attorney in such a conflict situation; and (ii) the risk that matters discussed at board meetings while she is present in the capacity of director might not be protected by the attorney-client privilege. Ms. O’Hara provided disclosure to the Board of the risks and possible conflicts involved with the relationship and recommended that the Board seek guidance from other counsel with respect to the reasonableness of the relationship. The Board then took such advice with respect to such matters as it deemed appropriate, including obtaining a memorandum from separate counsel regarding the above matters, and concluded that Ms. O’Hara’s service on the Board posed no significant risk of such conflicts and that alternate counsel would be available in the event such a conflict did arise.

Dr. Stephen W. McCahon holds in excess of 5% of our common stock and serves as our Chief Scientist pursuant to a Consulting Agreement with SWM Consulting LLC of which he is the principal. For a description of this Consulting Agreement, see “Directors and Executive Officers – Chief Scientist” above. See also, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”


Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

 

Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct,Company policy, all officers and directors of the companyCompany who have, or whose immediate family members have, any direct or indirect financial or other participation in any business that supplies goods or services to Applied Energetics, are required to notify our Compliance Officer,Board of Directors, who will review the proposed transaction and notify the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors for review andtake such action as it sees fit, including, if necessary, formal approval by the Board.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Consistent with the SEC requirements regarding auditor independence, our Board of Directors.Directors must pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, the Board must approve non-audit services prior to the commencement of the specified service. Our independent registered public accounting firm, RBSM LLP, have verified to our Board that they have not performed, and will not perform any prohibited non-audit service.

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES:

 

The following is a summary of the fees billed to the company by its independent registered Public Accounting firm for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018.2020.

 

  2019  2018 
Audit fees $46,000  $24,000 
Audit related fees  -   - 
All other fees  -   - 
Tax fees  5,000   4,000 
         
  $51,000  $28,000 
  2021  2020 
Audit fees $49,500  $44,500 
Audit related fees  -   - 
All other fees  42,500   5,000 
Tax fees  6,000   6,000 
  $98,000  $55,500 

 

Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit of the company and its subsidiaries, the review of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Tax fees include tax compliance, tax advice, research and development credits and tax planning related to federal and state tax matters.

 

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

Consistent with the SEC requirements regarding auditor independence, our Audit Committee has adopted a policy toBoard of Directors must pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the policy, the Audit CommitteeBoard must approve non-audit services prior to the commencement of the specified service. Our independent registered public accounting firm, RBSM LLP, have verified to our Audit CommitteeBoard that they have not performed, and will not perform any prohibited non-audit service.


PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

The following documents are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report:

 

(a)(1) The Consolidated Financial Statements of Applied Energetics, Inc. are filed as part of this report on page F-1 following the signatures.

 

Exhibits:

 

EXHIBIT
NUMBER
 DESCRIPTION
2.1 Amended and Restated Plan and Agreement of Merger entered into as of March 17, 2004, by and among U.S. Home & Garden, Inc. (“USHG”), Ionatron Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of USHG, Robert Kassel (for purposes of Sections 5.9, 6.2(d), 6.2(j), 9.4 and 10.10 only), Fred Heiden (for purposes of Section 9.4 only), and Ionatron, Inc. and Robert Howard, Stephen W. McCahon, Thomas C. Dearmin and Joseph C. Hayden (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2004).
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995).
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on April 29, 2004 (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004).
3.3 Certificate of Elimination of the 10% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 28, 2005).
3.4 Certificate of Designation of the 6.5% Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s 8-K filed with the SEC on October 28, 2005).
3.5 Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Applied Energetics, Inc. into Ionatron, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 20, 2008).
3.6 Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2007.
3.7 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on September 10, 2007.
4.1 Form of certificate evidencing Common Stock, $.001 par value, of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-38483)).
10.1 2018 Incentive Stock Plan (Previously filed).
10.2 Consulting and Advisory Services Agreement, effective as of February 15, 2019, by and between the Registrant and WCC Ventures, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2019).
10.3 Advisory Board Agreement by and between registrant and Christopher Donaghey (Previously filed).
10.4 Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of April 18,2019, by and between the Registrant and Gregory J. Quarles (Previously(previously filed).
10.5 Scientific Advisory Board Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Charles Hale (Previously filed.)
10.6 Consulting Agreement, by and between the Registrant and SWM Consulting, LLC (incorporated by reference to comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 31, 2019)
10.7 Asset Purchase Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Applied Optical Sciences, Inc. LLC (incorporated by reference to comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 31, 2019)
10.8 

Contract/Order for Supplied and Services with the Department of the Army, dated as of March 3, 2020. (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019)

2110.9 Lease Agreement, by and between the Registrant and Campus Research Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2021.
21Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006)
23.1 Consent of RBSM LLP
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1 Compensation Committee Charter (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010)
99.2 Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009)
99.3 Audit Committee Charter (incorporated by reference to the comparable exhibit filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

28


 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 3rd30th day of April 2020.March, 2022.

 

 APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
  
 By/s/ Gregory J Quarles
  Gregory J Quarles, President and
Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on the 3rd30th day of April, 2020March, 2022 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

 

Name Title
   
/s/ Bradford T. Adamczyk Director, Executive Chairman of the Board
Bradford T. Adamczyk  
   
/s/ Gregory J. Quarles Director, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Gregory J. Quarles  
   
/s/ Jonathan R. Barcklow Director, Vice President and Secretary
Jonathan R. Barcklow  
   
/s/ John E. Schultz Jr. Director
John E. Schultz Jr.
/s/ Mary P. O’HaraDirector, General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer
Mary P. O’Hara  

29


 

 

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20192021 and 20182020

INDEX

 

Page No.
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF - 2
  
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: 
  
Consolidated Balance SheetsF - 3
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF - 4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ DeficitEquityF - 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF - 6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF - 7


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

TheTo the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of

Applied Energetics, Inc. and Subsidiary

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Applied Energetics, Inc. and Subsidiary (collectively, the “company”) as of December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficitequity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the company at December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

The Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the company has suffered recurring losses from operations, will require additional capital to fund its current operating plan, and has stated that raises substantial doubt exists about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that maymight result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public companyCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Critical Audit Matters

Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements, and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments.

We determined that there are no critical audit matters.

/s/ RBSM LLP

 

We have served as the company’s auditor since 2016.

Las Vegas, NV

March 30, 2022

PCAOB ID Number 587

  

New York, NY

April 3, 2020


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

  DECEMBER 31, 
  2019  2018 
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $88,415  $178,552 
Subscription receivable  -   60,000 
Other receivable  2,880   312 
Other assets  52,686   10,923 
Total current assets  143,981   249,787 
         
Long-term assets        
Long-term receivables  582,377   441,195 
Property and equipment - net  36,568   38,887 

Deferred compensation

  2,083,334   - 
Total Long-term assets  2,702,279   480,082 
TOTAL ASSETS $2,846,260  $729,869 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $472,868  $681,408 
Accrued compensation  -   384,833 
Accrued officer compensation  206,000   206,000 
Notes payable  3,467,890   - 
Due to related parties  50,000   50,000 
Accrued expenses  23,587   20 
Accrued dividends  48,079   48,079 
Total current liabilities  4,268,424   1,370,340 
Long-term liabilities        
Long-term notes payable  1,500,000   - 
Total liabilities  5,768,424   1,370,340 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders’ deficit        
Series A convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value,  2,000,000 shares authorized and 13,602 shares issued  and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and at  December 31, 2018 (Liquidation preference $340,050  and  $340,050, respectively)  14   14 
Common stock, $.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares  authorized; 206,569,062 and 201,697,396 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and at December 31, 2018, respectively  206,569   201,697 
      Additional paid-in capital  85,907,523   82,637,749 
      Accumulated deficit  (89,036,270)  (83,479,931)
Total stockholders’ deficit  (2,922,164)  (640,471)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT $2,846,260  $729,869 
  DECEMBER 31, 
  2021  2020 
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $3,662,615  $3,323,290 
Other receivable  -   2,880 
Other assets  43,391   39,352 
Total current assets  3,706,006   3,365,522 
         
Long-term assets        
Security deposit  17,004   - 
Property and equipment - net  206,810   19,466 
Deferred compensation  416,666   1,250,001 
Right of Use Asset - Operating  544,670   - 
Total Long-term assets  1,185,150   1,269,467 
TOTAL ASSETS $4,891,156  $4,634,989 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $195,381  $152,445 
Notes payable  1,000,000   1,547,695 
Notes payable CARES Act PPP Loan  24,189   - 
Due to related parties  50,000   50,000 
Operating Lease Liability - current  76,227   - 
Accrued expenses  21,870   938 
Accrued dividends  48,079   48,079 
Total current liabilities  1,415,747   1,799,157 
         
Long-term liabilities Operating Lease Liability - non-current  507,188   - 
Long-term notes payable  -   1,000,000 
Long-term notes payable CARES Act PPP Loan  -   133,462 
Total long-term liabilities  507,188   1,133,462 
Total liabilities  1,922,935   2,932,619 
         
Stockholders’ equity        
Series A convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized and 13,602 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and at December 31, 2020 (Liquidation preference $340,050 and $340,050, respectively)  14   14 
Common stock, $.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 207,562,461 and 190,529,320 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and at December 31, 2020, respectively  207,562   190,529 
Additional paid-in capital  100,452,862   93,778,591 
Accumulated deficit  (97,692,217)  (92,266,764)
Total stockholders’ equity  2,968,221   1,702,370 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $4,891,156  $4,634,989 

 

SeeThe accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

  FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2019  2018 
       
Revenue $-  $- 
Cost of revenue  -   - 
         
Gross profit  -   - 
         
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative  4,622,624   2,521,837 
Selling and marketing  213,738   50,085 
Research and development  335,445   190,482 
Total operating expenses  5,171,807   2,762,404 
         
Operating loss  (5,171,807)  (2,762,404)
         
Other expense        
Other income  19,046   - 
Interest expense  (403,578)  (245,343)
Total other expense  (384,532)  (245,343)
         
Loss before provision for income taxes  (5,556,339)  (3,007,747)
         
Provision for income taxes  -   - 
         
Net loss  (5,556,339)  (3,007,747)
         
Preferred stock dividends  (34,005)  (34,005)
         
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(5,590,344) $(3,041,752)
         
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per common share – basic and diluted $(0.03) $(0.02)
         
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted  204,486,058   191,593,774 
  FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
 
  2021  2020 
       
Revenue $-  $175,920 
Cost of revenue  -   (153,630)
         
Gross profit  -   22,290 
         
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative  4,903,081   4,698,624 
Selling and marketing  317,350   296,461 
Research and development  281,896   266,864 
Total operating expenses  5,502,327   5,261,949 
         
Operating loss  (5,502,327)  (5,239,659)
         
Other income/(expense)        
Other income  81,218   15,832 
Gain on settlement  -   3,206,000 
Interest expense  (4,344)  (1,212,667)
Total other income/(expense)  76,874   2,009,165 
         
Loss before provision for income taxes  (5,425,453)  (3,230,494)
         
Provision for income taxes  -   - 
         
Net loss  (5,425,453)  (3,230,494)
         
Preferred stock dividends  (34,005)  (34,005)
         
Net loss attributable to common stockholders $(5,459,458) $(3,264,499)
         
Net loss attributable to common stockholders per common share – basic and diluted $(0.03) $(0.02)
         
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted  200,854,103   193,505,618 

 

SeeThe accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICITEQUITY

For the Year Ended DecemberFOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20192021 AND 2020

(Unaudited)

 

  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Additional
 Paid-in
  Accumulated  Total Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Deficit 
Balance as of December 31, 2017  13,602  $14   157,785,520  $157,785  $79,452,635  $(80,472,185) $(861,751)
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   -   -   380,982   -   380,982 
Shares issued for services  -   -   9,745,210   9,745   388,929   -   398,674 
Cancellation of shares  -   -   (5,000,000)  (5,000)  (7,000)  -   (12,000)
Sale of common stock  -   -   39,166,666   39,167   2,310,833   -   2,350,000 
Beneficial conversion factor on notes payable  -   -   -   -   111,370       111,370 
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2018  -   -   -   -   -   (3,007,747)  (3,007,747)
Balance as of December 31, 2018  13,602  $14   201,697,396  $201,697  $82,637,749  $(83,479,932) $(640,472)
Warrants issued with debt  -   -   -   -   263,237   -   263,237 
Shares issued for services  -   -   25,000   25   -   -   25 
Sale of common stock  -   -   4,846,666   4,847   849,152   -   853,999 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   -   -   2,157,385   -   2,157,385 
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2019  -   -   -   -   -   (5,556,339)  (5,556,339)
Balance as of  December 31, 2019  13,602  $14   206,569,062  $206,569  $85,907,523  $(89,036,271) $(2,922,165)
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Additional Paid-in  Accumulated  Total Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance as of December 31, 2019  13,602  $14   206,569,062  $206,569  $85,907,523  $(89,036,271) $(2,922,165)
Stock-based compensation expense                  1,487,701       1,487,701 
Restricted stock agreement-based non-cash compensation          18,750   19   13,106       13,125 
Common stock issued on exercise of stock option and warrant          1,075,000   1,075   74,175       75,250 
Sale of common stock          5,480,334   5,480   1,638,620       1,644,100 
Cancellation of common stock  -   -   (11,000,000)  (11,000)  11,000   -   - 
Accrual of payment in anticipation of settlement          (25,000,000)  (25,000)  (1,475,000)      (1,500,000)
Stock issuance to pay off convertible notes and accrued interest  -   -   18,386,174   18,386   5,497,466   -   5,515,852 
Purchase and cancellation of common stock  -   -   (5,000,000)  (5,000)  (295,000)  -   (300,000 
Recognize beneficial conversion feature  -   -   -   -   919,000   -   919,000 
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2020  -   -   -   -   -   (3,230,494)  (3,230,494)
Balance as of December 31, 2020  13,602  $14   190,529,320  $190,529  $93,778,591  $(92,266,764) $1,702,369 
                             
RSU restricted stock          31,250   31   4,519       4,550 
Stock-based compensation                  1,232,256       1,232,256 
Common stock issued on cashless exercise of options and warrants          4,082,637   4,084   (4,084)      - 
Common stock issued on exercise of options and warrants          1,650,010   1,650   106,350       108,000 
Common stock issued on exercised of convertible note          158,329   158   47,340       47,498 
Sale of common stock          11,110,915   11,110   5,287,890       5,299,000 
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2021  -   -   -   -   -   (5,425,453)  (5,425,453)
Balance as of December 31, 2021  13,602  $14   207,562,461  $207,562  $100,452,862  $(97,692,217) $2,968,221 

 

SeeThe accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

  FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 
  2019  2018 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
Net loss $(5,556,339) $(3,007,747)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Noncash stock based compensation expense  2,157,385   380,982 
Loss on early payoff of note payable  -   174,412 
Shares issued for services  25   398,674 
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature  -   204,119 
Amortization of future compensation payable  203,333   - 
Amortization of financing costs  -   22,721 
Depreciation and amortization  14,738     
Interest expense  396,578   18,501 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (9,888)  - 
Inventory  (5,930)  - 
Other long term assets  (141,182)  (441,195)
Other receivable  57,432   (60,000)
Prepaids and deposits  217,113   (19,792)
Long term receivables      - 
Accounts payable  (222,140)  629,772 
Accrued expenses and compensation  (361,266)  (92,054)
Net cash used in operating activities  (3,250,141)  (1,791,607)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Purchase of equipment  (12,419)  (38,887)
Net cash used by investing activities  (12,419)  (38,887)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from sale of common stock  853,999   2,230,000 
Cancellation of stock  -   (12,000)
Repayment on note payable  (31,576)  (361,468)
Proceeds from note payable net of financing costs  2,350,000   149,750 
Net cash provided by financing activities  3,172,423   2,006,282 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (90,137)  175,788 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  178,552   2,764 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $88,415  $178,552 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information        
Cash paid for interest $2,914  $18,501 
Cash paid for taxes $-  $- 
  FOR THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
 
  2021  2020 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
Net loss $(5,425,453) $(3,230,494)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Noncash stock based compensation expense  1,236,806   1,500,825 
Gain on settlement of accrued compensation  -   (206,000)
Common Stock issued for interest expenses  -   229,296 
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature  -   919,000 
Depreciation and amortization  20,024   17,102 
PPP loan forgiveness  (81,550)  - 
Amortization of future compensation payable  833,333   833,333 
Amortization of prepaid assets  156,562   149,856 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  -   9,888 
Other receivable  2,880   - 
Inventory  -   5,930)
Prepaids and deposits  (60,395)  (44,275)
ROU liabilities  38,745   - 
Accounts payable  42,936   (232,341)
Accrued interest  1,386   (89,755)
Accrued expenses and compensation  20,932   (22,649)
Net cash used in operating activities  (3,213,794)  (160,284)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Purchase of equipment  (207,367)  - 
Net cash used by investing activities  (207,367)  - 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from sale of common stock  5,299,000   1,644,100 
Purchase and cancellation of stock  -   (1,300,000)
Repayment of insurance premium loan  -   (108,064)
Repayment on note payable  (1,646,513)  (1,372,887)
Proceeds from note payable  -   4,324,000 
Proceeds from SBA loan      132,760 
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants  108,000   75,250 
Net cash provided by financing activities  3,760,487   3,395,159 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  339,325   3,234,875 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  3,323,290   88,415 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $3,662,615  $3,323,290 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information        
Cash paid for interest $1,421  $53,976 
Cash paid for taxes $-  $- 
Schedule of Non-Cash Information        
Insurance financing for prepaid insurance $117,209  $108,064 
Implementation of ASC 842 $617,569  $- 
Forgiveness of PPP loan $81,550  $- 
Equipment investing in accounts payable $64,107  $- 
Common stock issued for repayment of convertible notes $47,498  $5,253,614 
Beneficial conversion feature on notes payable $-  $919,000 
Long term investment utilized for cancellation of shares $-  $500,000 

 

SeeThe accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION OF BUSINESS, GOING CONCERN AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Applied Energetics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary North Star Power Engineering, Inc. (“North Star”) (collectively, “company,” “Applied Energetics,” “AERG”, “we,” “our” or “us”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statement amounts to conform to the current presentation.

 

Going Concern

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. For the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, the company incurred a net loss of approximately $5,556,000,$5,425,000, had negative cash flows from operations of $3,250,000approximately $3,214,000 and may incur additional future losses due to the reduction in Government contract activity. These mattersAt December 31, 2021, the company had total current assets of approximately $3,706,000 and total current liabilities of approximately $1,416,000 resulting in working capital of approximately $2,290,000. At December 31, 2021, the company had cash of approximately $3,663,000.

As of December 31, 2021, the company had cash of approximately $3,663,000. Based on the company’s current business plan, it believes its cash balance as of the date of this filing will be sufficient to meet its anticipated cash requirements for the next twelve months. However, there can be no assurance that the current business plan will be achievable. Such conditions raise substantial doubt as todoubts about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued.

 

The company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations. Management is devoting substantially all of its efforts to developing its business and raising capital and there can be no assurance that the company’s efforts will be successful. No assurance can be given that management’s actions will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its liquidity problems. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.  The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic contributes to this uncertainty.

 

In order to improve the company’s liquidity, the company’s management is actively pursuing additional equity financing through discussions with investment bankers and private investors. There can be no assurance that the company will be successful in its effort to secure additional equity financing.

 

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and the amount or classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the company be unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Applied Energetics, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our executive office is located at 2480 West Ruthrauff Road, Suite 140 Q, Tucson, Arizona, 85705, we have office and laboratory space are located at 4595 S Palo Verde Rd,9070 S. Rita Road, Suite 517,1500, Tucson, AZ 85714Arizona, 85747, and our telephone number is (520) 628-7415.

 


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its assumptions on historical experiences and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. In addition, management considers the basis and methodology used in developing and selecting these estimates, the trends in and amounts of these estimates, specific matters affecting the amount of and changes in these estimates, and any other relevant matters related to these estimates, including significant issues concerning accounting principles and financial statement presentation. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known which could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein. Significant estimates include revenue recognition, under the percentage of completion method of contract accounting, the valuation of inventory, carrying amounts of long-lived assets, valuation assumptions for share-based payments, evaluation of debt modification accounting, effective borrowing rate determinations, analysis of fair value transferred upon debt extinguishment, valuation and calculation of measurements of income tax assets and liabilities and valuation of debt discount related to beneficial conversion features.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders

 

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period before giving effect to stock options, stock warrants, restricted stock units and convertible securities outstanding, which are considered to be dilutive common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per common share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive shares outstanding during the period after giving effect to dilutive common stock equivalents. Contingently issuable shares are included in the computation of basic loss per share when issuance of the shares is no longer contingent. The number of warrants, options, restricted stock units and our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which were not included in the computation of earnings per share because the effect was antidilutive, was 35,246,75730,343,602 and 27,793,92435,612,091 for the years ended December 31, 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.

 


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Fair Value of Current Assets and Liabilities

 

The carrying amount of accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash equivalents are investments in money market funds or securities with an initial maturity of three months or less. These money market funds are invested in governmentWe maintain our cash balances at a commercial bank, and, US treasury based securities.at times, balances exceed FDIC limits. As of December 31, 2021, $3,412,615 of our cash balance was uninsured.

 

Income Taxes

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized currently for the future tax consequences attributable to the temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized. Our valuation allowance is currently 100% of our assets.

 

We consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is needed for some portion or all of a net deferred tax asset. Judgment is used in considering the relative impact of negative and positive evidence. In arriving at these judgments, the weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets and review the amount of such allowance annually. When we determine certain deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be utilized, we will reduce our valuation allowance accordingly.

 

Share-Based PaymentsRevenue Recognition

 

The company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) to depict the transfer of control to the company’s customers in an amount reflecting the consideration the company expects to be entitled. The company determines revenue recognition through the following steps:

i.Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer

ii.Identification of the performance obligations in the contract

iii.Determination of the transaction price

iv.Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

v.Recognition of revenue, when, or as, the company satisfied the performance obligation

The company generated revenue from its customer by preparing a technical report. The company’s single performance obligation was to deliver the final technical report detailing the findings of the company’s investigations. The fee for the report was fixed.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Share-Based Payments

Employee stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period. The fair value of each option grant is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. We make the following assumptions relative to this model: (i) the annual dividend yield is zero as we do not pay dividends on common stock, (ii) the weighted-average expected life is based on a midpoint scenario, where the expected life is determined to be half of the time from grant to expiration, regardless of vesting, (iii) the risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury security rate for the expected life, and (iv) the volatility is based on the level of fluctuations in our historical share price for a period equal to the weighted-average expected life. We estimate forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and adjust this estimate over the requisite service period should actual forfeitures differ from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change, and which impacts the amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.

 

Significant Concentrations and Risks

 

We maintain cash balances at a commercial bank, and, at times, balances exceed FDIC limits. Substantially allAs of December 31, 2021, $3,412,615 of our accounts receivable are with agents or departments of the US Federal Government which, although concentrated in one group of common entities, does not expose us to significant credit risk.cash balance was uninsured.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 2 – NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

In June 2016, the FASBThe company has reviewed all issued ASU 2016- 13, “Financial Instruments- Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.”accounting pronouncements and plans to adopt those that are applicable to it. The standard modifies the measurement approach for credit losses on financial instruments, including trade receivables, from an incurred loss method to a current expected credit loss method (“CECL”). The standard requires the measurement of expected credit losses to be based on relevant information, including historical experience, current conditions and a forecast that is supportable. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years; early adoption is permitted. The standard must be adopted by applying a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings. The Company anticipates adopting the standard in the first quarter of 2020, although itcompany does not expect a materialthe adoption of any other pronouncements to have an impact to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.on its results of operations or financial position.

 

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” ASU 2018-13 modified the disclosure requirements in Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement,” based on the FASB Concepts Statement, “Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting - Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements,” including consideration of costs and benefits. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The company is currently evaluating the potential effects of this guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14 “Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans,” which amends ASC 715-20, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General. The amended guidance modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other post-retirement plans by removing and adding certain disclosures for these plans. The eliminated disclosures include (a) the amounts in OCI expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit costs over the next fiscal year, and (b) the effects of a one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on the net periodic benefit costs and the benefit obligation for post-retirement health care benefits. Additional disclosures include descriptions of significant gains and losses affecting the benefit obligation for the period. This guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020. The adoption of this guidance will modify our disclosures but will not have a material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” ASU 2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In December 2019, the FASB issued amended guidance in the form of ASU No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) -: Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes” as partTaxes.” This ASU is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and clarifying certain aspects of its initiativethe current guidance to reduce complexity in the accounting standards. The guidancepromote consistency among reporting entities. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal yearsannual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all the amendments in the same period. Most amendments within this ASU are required to be applied on a prospective basis, while certain amendments must be applied on a retrospective or modified retrospective basis. The company has evaluated the impact of this new standard and notes the guidance will not have a material impact on our financial statements.

On August 5, 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06 which simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. ASU 2020-06 simplifies the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the issuer’s accounting for convertible debt instruments. Such guidance includes multiple disparate sets of classification, measurement, and derecognition requirements whose interactions are complex. ASU 2020-06 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all the amendments in the same period. Most amendments within this ASU are required to be applied on a prospective basis, while certain amendments must be applied on a retrospective or modified retrospective basis. The Companycompany is currentlyin the initial stage of evaluating the impact of this guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements, The Companynew standard however it does not expect material effect frombelieve the adoption of this guidance on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

There were other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or application to specific industries and are not expected towill have a material impact on the company’sour financial position, results of operations or cash flows.statements.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This standard requires all leases that have a term of over 12 months to be recognized on the balance sheet with the liability for lease payments and the corresponding right-of-use asset initially measured at the present value of amounts expected to be paid over the term. Recognition of the costs of these leases on the income statement will be dependent upon their classification as either an operating or a financing lease. Costs of an operating lease will continue to be recognized as a single operating expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Costs for a financing lease will be disaggregated and recognized as both an operating expense (for the amortization of the right-of-use asset) and interest expense (for interest on the lease liability). The company has adopted this standard beginning July 1, 2020, and the company now applies it on a modified retrospective basis to leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the company had one lease to which the standard applies. The adoption of the new standard resulted in the recognition of a right-of-use asset and lease liability of $617,569 and $617,569, respectively. At December 31, 2021, the right-of-use asset and lease liability were valued at $544,670 and $583,415, respectively

NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE

 

On May 24, 2019, the company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “APA”) with Applied Optical Sciences, LLC (“AOS”) to acquire certain assets. As consideration for the APA, the company entered into a promissory note issued to the shareholders of AOS for $2,500,000. The note is non-interest bearing and shall be repaid in equal installments. The company made the first three payments of $500,000 on February 10, 2021, May 24, 2021, and November 19, 2021, respectively. In accordance with the terms of the note, $500,000 is due on May 24, 2022 and the remaining $500,000 is due on November 24, 2022. The Promissory Note may be prepaid at any time (in whole or in part). Upon inception, the company recorded a debt discount in the amount of $2,500,000 in relation to the transaction which is being amortized over the life of the loan as compensation expense. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company made payments in the amount of $1,500,000, in the aggregate, for this promissory note. As of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the note is not in default.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Paycheck Protection Program

On April 28, 2020, the company entered into a loan agreement with Alliance Bank of Arizona, N.A. for a loan in the amount of $132,760 pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act enacted on March 27, 2020 (the “CARES Act”). This loan is evidenced by a promissory note dated April 27, 2020, and matures two years from the disbursement date. This loan bears interest at a rate of 1.00% per annum, with the first nine months of interest deferred. Principal and interest are payable monthly commencing nine months after the disbursement date and may be prepaid by the company at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. This loan contains customary events of default relating to, among other things, payment defaults or breaches of the terms of the loan. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lender may require immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding under the note.

Under the terms of the PPP, up to the entire amount of principal and accrued interest may be forgiven to the extent loan proceeds are used for qualifying expenses as described in the CARES Act and applicable implementing guidance issued by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) under the PPP. The company partially used the loan amount for designated qualifying expenses and received notice from the SBA on June 30, 2021, that the company would not be required to repay $81,550 in proceeds. As a result, the company received partial forgiveness of the PPP amounting to $80,594 in principal and $956 in interest which is reflected within PPP forgiveness and other income on the statements of operations. Additionally, the company made five payments during the year ended December 31, 2021, for a total of $29,306. As of December 31, 2021, $22,804 in principal and $1,385 in interest were outstanding and continue to accrue interest at 1% per annum. The loan is due to be repaid on April 20, 2022.

Premium Financing

On March 25, 2021, the company entered into an agreement with Oakwood D&O Insurance to provide financing in an amount of $156,279 for the insurance premium associated with two D&O policies. Both policies commenced March 12, 2021, and provided coverage for the next 12 months, expiring March 12, 2022. The loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 6.5% per annum and required the company to prepay $39,070 during the last three months of the term. On April 12, 2021, the company commenced monthly principal and interest payments of $13,024 on the remaining nine months due of $117,209, for the remaining nine months. The last payment was made on December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance on the note was $0.

During the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, the company received $2,350,000 from eleven non-affiliated individuals based on 10% Promissory Notes (“Notes”). $1,150,000converted $47,498 of the Notes mature September 1, 2019 and $1,200,000 of the notes mature December 1, 2019. The Notes are accompanied by a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (a “Warrant”) entitling the holder to purchase one share of the company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Shares”), for each $2.00 of Note principle, at an exercise price of $0.07 per share, for two years from the date of issuance. In the first three months of 2020, two notes with principal balances of $50,000 each were paid off for a total of $108,000.

On September 15, 2017 the company borrowed $53,000 under a convertible note maturing June 20, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the company’s $0.001 par value common stock after March 24, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 58% of the average of the lowest one-day trading price during the twenty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on conversion is limited to 4.99% of the company’s then issued and outstanding common stock. The company at the request of the note holder has reserved 36,369,879 shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The note can be prepaid at the company’s option until the Initial Conversion Date. The company issued the note holder warrants to purchase 1,320,598 shares of it’s $0.001 par value common stock at an exercise price of $0.0301, The Warrants are exercisable at any time over a 7-year period commencing on the date of issuance. The company calculated a beneficial conversion feature of $53,000 on this note against which approximately $53,000 has been amortized.

The above transaction of a note for $53,000 and attached warrants of 1,320,598 shares were put in place by previous management. On March 12, 2018, the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced loan and attached warrant and agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the $53,000 convertible note funded on October 18, 2017, and additionally repurchase the warrant. On March 16, 2018, the company paid in full the $53,000 convertible note and cancelled its associated warrant to purchase 1,320,598158,329 shares of common stock in a negotiated transaction. This note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market, and was considered to be a dilutive derivative event that could harm the future abilities of the company to operate and raise money. The total cost to the company to pay off this $53,000 note before the conversion date was $81,000. Additionally, the company cancelled the above referenced attached warrant which allowed the loan holder to purchase 1,320,598 shares of common stock at a material discount to the market. This warrant was given to the noteholder by previous management as an incentive to make the above referenced loan. The cost to the company to cancel the warrant was $40,000. The total combined cost to the company to cancel the loan and warrant was $121,000. The payment was comprised of $56,000 principal and accrued interest, prepayment premium of $25,000 and $40,000 to buy back the warrant. The note was paid in full on March 16, 2018. The company borrowed the $121,000 used to pay off this loan before the conversion date, via an interest free loan from two directors of the company.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSstock.

 

On October 18, 2017 the company borrowed $33,000 under a convertible note maturing July 20, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the company’s $0.001 par value common stock after April 16, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 58% of the average of the lowest one-day trading price during the twenty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on conversion is limited to 4.99% of the company’s then issued and outstanding common stock. The company at the request of the note holder has reserved 18,062,397 shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The note can be prepaid at the company’s option until the Initial Conversion Date. The company calculated a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $24,000 on this note against which $14,000 has been amortized.

The above transaction of a note for $33,000 was put in place by previous management. On April 10, 2018, the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced convertible loan funded on October 18, 2017 in the amount of $33,000 and agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the referenced note which was put in place by previous management. This note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market and was considered by the company to be a dilutive derivative event that could harm the future abilities of the company to operate and raise money. The cost to the company to pay off this $33,000 note before the conversion date was $51,000. The payment was comprised of $35,000 principal and accrued interest, and prepayment premium of $16,000. The note was paid in full on April 12, 2018.

On November 16, 2017 the company borrowed $38,000 under a convertible note maturing August 20, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the company’s $0.001 par value common stock after May 16, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 58% of the average of the lowest one-day trading price during the twenty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on conversion is limited to 4.99% of the company’s then issued and outstanding common stock. The company at the request of the Note Holder has reserved 20,716,914 shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The note can be prepaid at the company’s option until the Initial Conversion Date. The company calculated a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $28,000 on this note against which $13,000 has been amortized.

The above transaction of a note for $38,000 was put in place by previous management. On May 4, 2018 the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced convertible loan funded on November 16, 2017 in the amount of $38,000 and agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the referenced note which was put in place by previous management. This note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market and was considered by the company to be a dilutive derivative event that could harm the future abilities of the company to operate and raise money. The cost to the company to pay off this $38,000 note before the conversion date was $58,000. The payment was comprised of $40,000 principal and accrued interest, and prepayment premium of $18,000. The note was paid in full on May 7, 2018.

On December 27, 2017 the company borrowed $28,000 under a convertible note maturing September 20, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the company’s $0.001 par value common stock after April 16, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 58% of the average of the lowest one-day trading price during the twenty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on conversion is limited to 4.99% of the company’s then issued and outstanding common stock. The company at the request of the note holder has reserved 17,164,750 shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The note can be prepaid at the company’s option until the Initial Conversion Date. The company calculated a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $20,000 on this note against which $7,000 has been amortized.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The above transaction of a note for $28,000 was put in place by previous management. On May 4, 2018 the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced convertible loan funded on December 27, 2017 in the amount of $28,000 and agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the referenced note which was put in place by previous management. This note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market and was considered by the company to be a dilutive derivative event that could harm the future abilities of the company to operate and raise money. The cost to the company to pay off this $28,000 note before the conversion date was $41,000. The payment was comprised of $29,000 principal and accrued interest, and prepayment premium of $12,000. The note was paid in full on May 18, 2018.

On January 8, 2018 the company borrowed $105,000 under a convertible note maturing August 28, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty-four percent (24%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the company’s $0.001 par value common stock after April 27, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 55% of the lowest one-day trading price during the twenty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on any conversion is limited to 4.99% of the company’s then issued and outstanding common stock. The note holder may increase the 4,99% limit to 9.99% on 61 days prior notice to the company. The company, at the request of the note holder, has reserved 40 million shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The note can be prepaid at the company’s option until May 29, 2018. The company also entered into a security agreement pledging substantially all of its assets except for those related to Laser Guided Energy as collateral for the note.

The above transaction of a note for $105,000 was put in place by previous management. On April 25, 2018, the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced convertible loan funded on January 08, 2017 in the amount of $105,000, the board agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the referenced note before its conversion date. The note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market, in addition it pledged virtually all the assets of the company as collateral. The company’s board of directors considered this to be a significant derivative event that was extremely dilutive to existing shareholders. Additionally, it was the opinion of the company’s board of directors that this loan harmed the future abilities of the company to operate as a going concern and would make it nearly impossible to raise money in the future. The cost to the company to pay off this $105,000 note before the conversion date was $163,000 The payment was executed as paid in full on April 27, 2018 and was comprised of $109,000 principal and accrued interest, and a prepayment premium of $54,000 for a total of $163,000.

On March 8, 2018 the company borrowed $26,500 under a convertible note maturing December 15, 2018. The note bears interest of 12% payable at maturity. Any amount of principal or interest on the note which is not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twenty two percent (22%) per annum from the due date thereof until the same is paid. The note is convertible into shares of the company’s $0.001 par value common stock after September 5, 2018 (the “Initial Conversion Date”). The conversion rate is variable and will be 51% of the average of the lowest one day trading price during the thirty trading days preceding the holders notice of conversion. The number of shares issuable on conversion is limited to 4.99% of the company’s then issued and outstanding Common Stock. The company at the request of the Note Holder has reserved 11,008,640 shares of its $0.001 common stock for conversion. The note can be prepaid at the company’s option until the Initial Conversion Date.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The above transaction of a note for $26,500 was put in place by previous management. On May 4, 2018 the company’s newly elected board of directors discussed its options concerning the above referenced convertible loan funded on December 27, 2017 in the amount of $26,500 and agreed that it would be in the best interest of the company and its shareholders to pay in full the referenced note which was put in place by previous management. This note carried special early stock conversion rights at a material discount to market and was considered by the company to be a dilutive derivative event that could harm the future abilities of the company to operate and raise money. The cost to the company to pay off this $26,500 note before the conversion date was $37,000. The payment was comprised of $27,000 principal and accrued interest, and prepayment premium of $10,000. The note was paid in full on May 18, 2018.

The following reconciles notes payable as of December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 2018:2020:

 

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
Convertible notes payable $-  $(98,903)
Notes payable  4,880,000   - 
Accrued interest  119,218   (13,250)
Payments on notes payable  (85,657)  - 
Financing costs  -   (3,317)
Transfer from prepaid  54,329   - 
Amortization of financing costs  -   22,721 
Beneficial conversion factor  -   (111,370)
Amortization of beneficial conversion factor  -   204,119 
         
  $4,967,890  $- 
  December 31,
2021
  December 31,
2020
 
Beginning balance $2,681,157  $4,967,890 
Notes payable  117,209   4,456,760 
Accrued interest  1,385   297,849 
Transfer from prepaid  -   108,064 
Initial beneficial conversion feature  -   (919,000)
Amortize beneficial conversion feature  -   919,000 
Payments on notes payable  (1,646,513)  (1,480,951)
Repayment of interest  -   (152,603)
Extinguishment of Debt  (81,550)  - 
Converted into common stock  (47,498)  (5,515,852)
Total  1,024,190   2,681,157 
Less-Notes payable - current  1,024,190   (1,547,695)
Notes payable - non-current $-  $1,133,462 

 

Future principal payments for the company’s Notes as of December 31, 2021 are as follows:

2022 $1,024,190 
Thereafter  - 
Total $1,024,190 

The company’s note payable balance of $1,204,190 is due within the next twelve months, in accordance with the terms of note payable. Of the $4,967,890 loan balance, $3,467,890 are short term and $1,500,000 are long term $2,467,890 are payable immediately andremaining $1,204,190, $1,000,000 consists of thetwo remaining $2,500,000 is payable in equal semi-annual installments, the first payment beingpayments of $500,000, due on May 24, 20202022 and subsequent payments being dueNovember 24, 2022, which is the remaining balance on the last daynote payable that the company assumed as part of each six-month period thereafter, the final such payment being dueagreement to acquire Applied Optical Sciences. In accordance with the terms of note payable, the company made the first three payments of $500,000 on February 10, 2021, May 24, 2022.2021, and November 19, 2021.

Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2021, the company entered into a $175,434.65 financing agreement to finance its Directors and Officers insurance premiums.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 – DEFERRED COMPENSATION

On May 24, 2019, the company entered into the APA with AOS to acquire certain assets. As consideration for the APA, the company entered into a promissory note issued to the shareholders of AOS for $2,500,000. The company also recorded a debt discount, which is reported on the balance sheet as deferred compensation, in the amount of $2,500,000 in relation to the transaction which is being amortized over the life of the loan as compensation expense. The amortization of deferred compensation for the year ended December 31, 2021, and 2020 was $833,333 and $833,333, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, the remaining deferred compensation to be amortized was $416,667 and $1,250,000, respectively.

NOTE 45 – DUE TO RELATED PARTIES

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the company, under its new management, has borrowed a total of $132,000 from Mr. Bradford T Adamczyk, the company’s PEO and director, and Jonathan Barcklow, the company’s Vice President and Secretary and director. These loans are interest free and are payable on demand. On May 1, 2018, both directors submitted subscription agreements for $60,000 for 1,000,000 shares of company common stock, each to be settled with the company’s debt. On July 23, 2018, the remaining balance of $12,000 was paid back to one director.

It has come to the board’s attention that on July 31, 2018, our now deceased CEO deposited $50,000 into the company’s account. Although it has been suggested that the funds may have been intended for use toward Mr. Dearmin’s healthcare, the board does not know for certain what the purpose of the funds were or the nature of any intended investment. Accordingly, the board is investigating the appropriate disposition of the funds which will likely be to the estate of Mr. Dearmin. Until such a determination is made, the board does not intend to use these funds for any corporate purpose. For reporting purposes, the company has treated the deposit as a due to related partyparty.

NOTE 56 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

Authorized Capital Stock

 

OurThe company’s authorized capital stock consists of 500,000,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $.001 per share and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock at a par value of $.001 per share.

 

A certificate of amendment to increase our authorize common stock from 125,000,000 to 500,000,000 shares was filed and accepted and recorded by the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 3, 2016.

On December 4, 2017 previous management entered into a financial services agreement with BMA Securities for which, on January 26, 2018, it issued 5,000,000 shares of stock valued at $150,000.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On January 24, 2018, we issued 1,242,710 shares of common stock in settlement of invoices valued at $38,524.26 with a vendor. This transaction was consummated by previous management to pay its attorney fees.

On April 12, 2018 the company received $120,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On April 16, 2018 the company received $30,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock.

On April 17, 2018 the company received $100,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,666,667 shares of its common stock.

On April 26, 2018 the company received $90,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,500,000 shares of its common stock.

On May 4, 2018 the company received $30,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock.

On May 8, 2018 the company received $120,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On May 14, 2018 the company received $30,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock.

On May 14, 2018 the company received $200,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 3,333,333 shares of its common stock.

On May 15, 2018 the company received $30,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock.

On May 16, 2018 the company received $20,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 333,333 shares of its common stock.

On May 25, 2018 the company received $600,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On June 13, 2018 the company received $140,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 2,333,333 shares of its common stock.

On September 20, 2018 the company received $120,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On September 25, 2018 the company received a total of $60,000 from two individuals based on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On October 3, 2018 the company received $90,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,500,000 shares of its common stock.

Effective October 19, 2018 the company received $20,000 and a note for $100,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock. The note is non-interest bearing and is to be paid in five monthly payments of $20,000 starting November 20, 2018 The balance of the note receivable at December 31, 2018 was $60,000. In the first three months of 2019, the remaining $60,000 was received.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On October 22, 2018 the company received $30,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 500,000 shares of its common stock.

Effective October 30, 2018, AERG entered into a Mutual Release and Hold Harmless Agreement (“Agreement”) with Gregory Fettig and Mr. Fettig’s former law firm, Duff Bornsen and Fettig, LLP (collectively, the “Fettig Parties”). The Agreement resolves claims concerning the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of AERG common stock, par value $.001 per share, to the Fettig Parties as authorized by prior company director George Farley as compensation for legal services rendered to the company by the Fettig Parties valued at $5,000. The Agreement also resolves claims concerning unpaid invoices to AERG for legal services performed by the Fettig Parties. Pursuant to the Agreement, AERG paid the Fettig Parties an aggregate of $12,000, representing full satisfaction of fees for legal services of $9,825 plus additional consideration of $2,175. The Fettig Parties agreed to surrender to AERG the stock certificate representing the 5,000,000 shares. The Agreement also contains standard representations and warranties and mutual releases and indemnification provisions.

On November 1, 2018 the company received $120,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On December 7, 2018 the company received $60,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On December 21, 2018 the company received $60,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock.

On December 31, 2018 the company received $60,000 from an individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock.

In January 2019, the company received $150,000 from 3 non-affiliated individuals based on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 2,500,000 shares of its common stock.

During the fourth quarter of 2019, the company received $904,000 from four non-affiliated individuals based on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 3,038,332 shares of its common stock.

In January 2020, the company received $603,000 from five non-affiliated individuals based on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 2,010,000 shares of its common stock.

 

In January 2020, the company received issued 25,000 shares in response toupon exercise of a warrant by a non-affiliated warrant holder exercising a warrant.at an exercise price of $0.07 per share.

 

In February 2020, the company received $510,000 from a non-affiliated individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,700,000 shares of its common stock.

 

Preferred StockIn April 2020, the company received $11,000 from an individual based on a warrant exercise for which the company issued 150,000 shares of its common stock.

 

In April 2020, the company received $63,000 from an individual based on an option exercise for which the company issued 900,000 shares of its common stock.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In April 2020, the company received $531,000, in the aggregate, from an individuals based on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 1,770,333 shares of its common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 4,054,665 shares of common stock in a private placement to accredited investors for $0.75 per share or $3,041,000 of net cash proceeds, in the aggregate.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 7,056,250 shares of common stock in a private placement to accredited investors for $0.32 per share or $2,258,000 of net cash proceeds, in the aggregate.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 158,329 shares of common stock upon the conversion of $47,498 of convertible notes (see Note 3).

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 31,250 shares of common stock in relation to a restricted stock agreement with a value of $4,550.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 800,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 800,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 a share.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 250,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 250,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.06 a share.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 50,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 50,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.06 a share.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 100,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 100,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.07 a share.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 200,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 200,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.06 a share.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 125,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 125,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.06 a share.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 60,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 60,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.06 a share.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 65,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 65,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.06 a share.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 1,005,682 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 1,090,910 options at an exercise price of $0.05 a share. This exercise was performed on a cashless basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 259,741 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 500,000 options at an exercise price of $0.37 a share. This exercise was performed on a cashless basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 475,000 shares of common stock with an exercise of 500,000 options. 25,000 shares of common stock were withheld with the exercise. This exercise was performed on a cashless basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 482,143 shares of common stock with an exercise of 500,000 options. 17,857 shares of common stock were withheld with the exercise. This exercise was performed on a cashless basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 728,814 shares of common stock with an exercise of 750,000 options. 21,186 shares of common stock were withheld with the exercise. This exercise was performed on a cashless basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 400,158 shares of common stock with an exercise of 409,090 options. 8,932 shares of common stock were withheld with the exercise. This exercise was performed on a cashless basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 731,109 shares of common stock with an exercise of 750,000 options. 18,891 shares of common stock were withheld with the exercise. This exercise was performed on a cashless basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company recognized stock-based compensation in the amount of $1,236,806.

Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 20192021, and 20182020 there were 13,602 and 13,602 shares of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) outstanding, respectively. The company has not paid the dividends commencing with the quarterly dividend due August 1, 2013. Dividend arrearages as of December 31, 20182021, including previously accrued dividends included in our balance sheet are approximately $221,000.$295,000. Our Board of Directors suspended the declaration of the dividend, commencing with the dividend payable as of February 1, 2015, since we did not have a surplus (as such term is defined in the Delaware general corporation Law) as of December 31, 2014, until such time as we have a surplus or net profits for a fiscal year.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Our Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $25.00 per Share. The Series A Preferred Stock bears dividends at the rate of 6.5% of the liquidation preference per share per annum, which accrues from the date of issuance, and is payable quarterly. Dividends may be paid in: (i) cash, (ii) shares of our common stock (valued for such purpose at 95% of the weighted average of the last sales prices of our common stock for each of the trading days in the ten trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the applicable dividend payment date), provided that the issuance and/or resale of all such shares of our common stock are then covered by an effective registration statement and the company’s common stock is listed on a U.S. national securities exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market at the time of issuance or (iii) any combination of the foregoing. If the company fails to make a dividend payment within five business days following a dividend payment date, the dividend rate shall immediately and automatically increase by 1% from 6.5% of the liquidation preference per offered share of Series A preferred stock to 7.5% of such liquidation preference. If a payment default shall occur on two consecutive dividend payment dates, the dividend rate shall immediately and automatically increase to 10% of the liquidation preference for as long as such payment default continues and shall immediately and automatically return to the Initial dividend rate at such time as the payment default is no longer continuing.

 


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into a number of shares of common stock equal to the liquidation preference (plus any unpaid dividends for periods prior to the dividend payment date immediately preceding the date of conversion by the holder) divided by the conversion price (initially $12.00 per share, subject to adjustment in the event of a stock dividend or split, reorganization, recapitalization or similar event.) If the closing sale price of the common stock is greater than 140% of the conversion price on 20 out of 30 trading days, the company may redeem the Series A Preferred Stock in whole or in part at any time through October 31, 2010, upon at least 30 days’ notice, at a redemption price, payable in cash, equal to 100% of the liquidation preference of the shares to be redeemed, plus unpaid dividends thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date, subject to certain conditions. In addition, beginning November 1, 2010, the company may redeem the Series A Preferred Stock in whole or in part, upon at least 30 days’ notice, at a redemption price, payable in cash, equal to 100% of the liquidation preference of the Series A Preferred Stock to be redeemed, plus unpaid dividends thereon to, but excluding, the redemption date, under certain conditions.

 

If a change of control occurs, each holder of shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that are outstanding immediately prior to the change of control shall have the right to require the corporation to purchase, out of legally available funds, any outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at the defined purchase price. The purchase price is defined as: per share of Preferred Stock, 101% of the liquidation preference thereof, plus all unpaid and accumulated dividends, if any, to the date of purchase thereof. The purchase price is payable, at the corporation’s option, (x) in cash, (y) in shares of the common stock at a discount of 5% from the fair market value of Common Stock on the Purchase Date (i.e. valued at a 95% discount of the Common Stock on the Purchase Date), or (z) any combination thereof.

 

If the Corporation pays all or a portion of the Purchase Price in Common Stock, no fractional shares of Common Stock will be issued; instead, the company will round the applicable number of shares of Common Stock up to the nearest whole number of shares; provided that the Corporation may pay the Purchase Price (or a portion thereof), whether in cash or in shares of Common Stock, only if the Corporation has funds legally available for such payment and may pay the Purchase Price (or a portion thereof) in shares of its Common Stock only if (i) the Common Stock is listed on a U.S. national securities exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market at the time of issuance and (ii) a shelf registration statement covering the issuance by the Corporation and/or resales of the Common Stock issuable as payment of the Purchase Price is effective on the Payment Date unless such shares are eligible for immediate resale in the public market by non-affiliates of the Corporation.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Dividends on our Preferred Stock are payable quarterly on the first day of February, May, August and November, in cash or shares of Common Stock, at our discretion.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2015, the company purchased 93,570 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for approximately $58,000. The company cancelled the shares and returned them to unissued status. The company also reversed approximately $331,000 of accrued dividends payable.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Share-Based Payments

  

Share-Based Payments

Effective November 12, 2018, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Applied Energetics, Inc. adopted the 2018 Incentive Stock Plan. The plan provides for the allocation and issuance of stock, restricted stock purchase offers and options (both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options) to officers, directors, employees and consultants of the company. The board reserved a total of 50,000,000 shares for possible issuance under the plan.

 

We have, from time to time, also granted non-plan options to certain officers, directors, employees and consultants. Total stock-based compensation expense for grants to officers, employees and consultants was approximately $2,549,000$1,232,256 and $381,000$1,501,000 for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20192021, and 2018,2020, respectively, which was charged to general and administrative expense.

 

ThereThe $1,236,806 stock-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2021, was comprised of $520,819 option expense and $669,000 was the amortization of 5,000,000 shares of stock valued at $0.4014 over three years for the acquisition of assets of Applied Optical Sciences. Additionally, stock-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2021, was comprised of 140,000 shares under a restricted stock agreement the Company entered into in May of 2021. The restricted stock awards were valued at $84,000 of which $46,987 was recognized in 2021. The shares vest annually over two years with the first installment one year from the agreement; provide, however, if either party terminates the agreement at any time prior to the last date of it ending, then the shares will best, pro rata, for each month served since the most recent prior annual vesting date.

The company recognized no related income tax benefit recognized because our deferred tax assets are fully offset by a valuation allowance.

 

The company issued 140,000 shares through restricted stock grants year ended December 31, 2021, and 2020. The company renewed a consulting agreement, extending services for an additional term of two sequential one-year periods. As compensation for the renewal, Mr. Donaghey is to receive for each year of service during the renewal term 70,000 shares of AERG common stock and options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.61 per share, reflecting the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. 50% of the options vest on the first anniversary of the renewal, and the other 50% vest on the second anniversary, 50% of the common stock vests immediately and the remaining 50% on the first anniversary of the agreement.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 760,000 options to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.61 a share. The options vest over a period of three years from the date of the amendment.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 1,000,000 options to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.19 a share. The options vest over a period of three years from the date of the amendment.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the company issued 155,000 options to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $1.21 a share. The options vest over a period of three years from the date of the amendment.

The following table sets forth information regarding awards undersummarizes the activity of our 2018 Incentive Stock Plan:stock options for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021:

  

As of December 31, 2019
  Share
Grants
Approved
  Options
Outstanding
  Shares
Available for
Award
 
2018 Incentive Stock Plan  50,000,000   20,150,000   29,850,000 
Total  50,000,000   20,150,000   29,850,000 
  Shares  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted Average Contractual Term Outstanding  Intrinsic Value 
Outstanding at January 1, 2020  32,900,000   0.1428   6.6  $4,731,000 
Granted  -   -         
Exercised  (900,000)  0.0700         
Forfeited or expired  -   -         
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  32,000,000  $0.1419   5.6  $6,054,000 
Granted  1,915,000  $0.7806         
Exercised  (4,500,000) $0.0856         
Forfeited or expired  (1,000,000) $0.3700         
Outstanding at December 31, 2021  28,415,000  $0.1859   5.84  $60,640,900 
                 
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2021  23,128,888  $0.1291   5.84  $50,673,665 

 


 

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We determine the fair value of option grant share-based awards at their grant date, using a Black-Scholes- Merton Option-Pricing Model applying the assumptions in the following table:

 

  For the year ended
December 31,
  2019 2018
Expected life (years) 5.5 - 6.75 5.2 - 10
Dividend yield 0% 0%
Expected volatility 232% 80% - 275%
Risk free interest rates 2.47% 3.1% - 3.33%
Weighted average fair value of options at grant date $0.3400 $0.0597
  For the year ended
December 31,
 
  2021  2020 
Expected life (years)  2-3   N/A 
Dividend yield  0%  N/A 
Expected volatility  128-130%  N/A 
Risk free interest rates  .05-.07   N/A 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019, 6,650,000 options to purchase stock were granted, 3,000,000 options to purchase stock were forfeited, additionally, no options to purchase stock were exercised or expired; no restricted stock purchase offers were granted, vested or forfeited. At December 31, 2019, options to purchase 31,400,000 shares of common stock were outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $0.15 with a weighted average remaining contract term of approximately 6.6 years with an aggregate intrinsic value (amount by which Applied Energetics’ closing stock price on the last trading day of the year exceeds the exercise price of the option) of $4,731,000. At December 31, 2019 options for 19,085,000 shares were exercisable. There was no activity of our restricted stock units and restricted stock grants for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of December 31, 2019,2021, there was approximately $1,709,000$764,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted and outstanding, net of estimated forfeitures. The cost is expected to be recognized on a weighted average basis over a period of approximately one year.

 

DuringAs of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the company recorded $223,000 and $892,000, respectively, in unrecognized stock-based compensation related to a lockup agreement on 5,000,000 shares of common stock in the acquisition of assets of AOS valued at $0.4014 per share, representing the closing price on the date of the contract which is amortized over 36 months. $669,000 and $669,000 was amortized for the year ended December 31, 2019, the company received $2,150,000 in proceeds from the issuance of promissory notes payable (“Notes”) with which the company also issued warrants to purchase 1,075,000 shares of the company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share at an exercise price of $0.07 per share for two years from the date of issuance. $1,150,000 of the Notes mature September 1, 20192021, and $1,000,000 of the notes mature December 1, 2019. The notes bear interest of 10% payable at maturity. On maturity date, the company may elect to convert $850,000 of the balance of principal and interest due into shares of common stock at the conversion price of $0.10 a share.2020, respectively.

 

Under an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2019, by and between the company and Applied Optical Sciences, Inc., an Arizona corporation which is majority owned by the holder of in excess of 10% of the company’s common stock, we issued warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of the company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share at an exercise price of $0.06 per shareAdditionally, stock-based compensation for ten years from the date of issuance.

In the last quarter of the year ended December 31, 2019, we issued warrants to purchase 225,0002021, was comprised of 140,000 shares under a restricted stock agreement the Company entered into in May of the company’s common2021. The restricted stock par value $0.001 per shareawards were valued at an exercise price$84,000 of $0.07 per share forwhich $46,987 was recognized in 2021. The shares vest annually over two years with the first installment one year from the agreement; provide, however, if either party terminates the agreement at any time prior to the last date of issuance.it ending, then the shares will best, pro rata, for each month served since the most recent prior annual vesting date

 

We have entered into an Executive Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) with Dr. Gregory J Quarles setting forth the terms of his service as Chief Executive Officer. The agreement calls for an option for 5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share. These options vest immediately with respect to 500,000 shares and in semi-annual installments with respect to the remaining 4,500,000 shares. The agreement also provides for Quarles to retain 2,000,000 options previously granted to him under a Consultant Stock Option Agreement in 2017, for his services on the Scientific Advisory Board, which are subject to vesting based on achievement of performance milestones. The agreement also provides for Dr. Quarles to forfeit 1,500,000 performance options previously granted to him under a Consultant Stock Option Agreement in 2017, for his services on the Scientific Advisory Board. Under the agreement, In the event of a termination of the agreement by Quarles with Good Reason, or by us without cause, any unvested options will vest upon such termination.

In April 2019, 150,000 options were grated with an exercise price of $0.35 and a vesting schedule of 25% on the six-month anniversary of the issuance of the option and 25% each of the following six-month anniversaries. Also 1,500,000 options were granted with an exercise price of $0.369 and a vesting schedule of 1/3 on each of the three succeeding anniversary of the issuance of the option. 1,500,000 performance options previously granted to under a Consultant Stock Option Agreement in 2017, for services on the Scientific Advisory Board were forfeited.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, 13,750,000 options to purchase stock were granted, additionally, no options to purchase stock were exercised, expired or forfeited; no restricted stock purchase offers were granted, vested or forfeited. At December 31, 2018, options to purchase 27,750,000 shares of common stock were outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $0.1037 with a weighted average remaining contract term of approximately 6.5 years with an aggregate intrinsic value of $-0-. At December 31, 2018 options for 9,712,500 shares were exercisable.

As of December 31, 2018, there was approximately $536,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted and outstanding, net of estimated forfeitures. The cost is expected to be recognized on a weighted average basis over a period of approximately one and a half years.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On November 1, 2018, a non-plan option for 250,000 shares was granted to a vendor with an exercise price of $0.13 with 62,500 vested on the date of option and an additional 62,500 vesting on the last day of each 90-day period following the date of option.

On November 12, 2018 13,500,000 options were grated with an exercise price of $0.07 and a vesting schedule of 36% on grant date and 4% each month to February 2020. Of the 13,500,000 options granted, 5,000,000 each were granted to Messrs. Bradford T. Adamczyk and Jonathan R. Barcklow, an option for 2,500,000 was granted to Mr. John E. Schultz Jr, and an option for 1,000,000 was granted to an independent consultant.

The fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units was estimated using the closing price of our common stock on the date of award and fully recognized upon vesting.

The following table summarizes the Restricted stock activity of our stock options for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, and 2018:2021 was as follows:

 

  Shares  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
       
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  14,000,000  $0.1357 
Granted  13,750,000  $0.0711 
Exercised  -  $- 
Forfeited or expired  -  $- 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  27,750,000  $0.1037 
Granted  6,650,000  $0.3543 
Exercised  -  $- 
Forfeited or expired  (3,000,000) $0.2500 
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  31,400,000  $0.1428 
Exercisable at December 31, 2019  19,085,000  $0.0616 
  Restricted Stock Outstanding 
  Shares  Weighted
Average
Fair Value
per Share
at Grant Date
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  -     
Granted – restricted stock units and awards  75.000   0.35 
Granted – performance based stock units  -   - 
Canceled  -   - 
Vested and converted to shares  -   - 
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  75,000   0.35 
Granted – restricted stock units and awards  140,000   0.61 
Granted – performance based stock units  -     
Canceled  -     
Vested and converted to shares  -     
Outstanding at December 31, 2021  215,000   0.52 


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We determine the fair value of warrant grant share-based awards at their grant date, using a Black-Scholes- Merton Option-Pricing Model applying the assumptions in the following table:

 

  For the year ended
December 31,
 
  2021  2020 
Expected life (years)   N/A   1.0 
Dividend yield   N/A   0%
Expected volatility   N/A   125.19%
Risk free interest rates   N/A   0.14%
Weighted average fair value of warrants at grant date $N/A   .308 

As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 there was no unrecognized stock-based compensation related to unvested restricted stock, net of estimated forfeitures.

  Warrant Activity    
  Shares  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2020  3,675,000  $0.0632   

6.96

 
Granted  50,000   0.0500     
Exercised  (175,000)  0.0700     
Forfeited or expired  -   -     
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  3,550,000  $0.0627   6.17 
Granted  -   -   - 
Exercised  (1,650,000)  0.0652     
Forfeited or expired  (125,000)  0.0599     
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2021  1,775,000  $0.0599   7.43 
             
             
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2021  1,775,000   0.0599   7.43 

  Warrants Outstanding  Warrants Exercisable 
     Weighted Avg.          
     Remaining          
  Shares  Contractual  Weighted Avg.  Shares  

Weighted Avg.

 
Range of Exercise Prices Outstanding  Life in Years  Exercise Price  Exercisable  Exercise Price 
                
$0.05 - $0.07  1,775,000   7.43  $0.0599   1,775,000  $0.0599 
   1,775,000   7.43  $0.0599   1,775,000  $0.0599 


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 67 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Operating Leases

 

In May 2016, we moved and entered into a month-to-month lease agreement to lease office space in Tucson, Arizona. In May 2019, we acquired Applied Optical Sciences and assumed the month-to-month lease for office and laboratory space also in Tucson, Arizona.

 

Rent expense was approximately $30,000$155,000 and $4,000$49,000 for 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.

 

In March 2021, we signed a five-year lease for a 13,000 square foot laboratory/office space here in Tucson. The lease term begins May 1, 2021, and ends on April 30, 2026. The base rent is $6.7626 per rentable square foot for year one, and escalates to $9.2009 in year two, $11.4806 in year three, $13.1740 in year four and $14.9306 in year five, plus certain operating expenses and taxes.

At December 31, 2019,2021, we had approximately $4,066$112,000 in future minimum lease payments due in less than a year. The below table presents the future minimum lease payments due reconciled to lease liabilities.

 

  Operating Lease 
For the fiscal years ending December 31, 2021:   
2022 $112,141 
2023  143,325 
2024  168,577 
2025  191,779 
Thereafter  66,536 
Total undiscounted lease payments  682,358 
Present value discount, less interest  98,942 
Lease Liability $583,416 

Guarantees

 

We agree to indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences arising as a result of the officers or directors serving in such capacity. The maximum amount of future payments that we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited. However, we maintain a director’s and officer’s liability insurance policy that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result, we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal because of our insurance coverage and we have not recognized any liabilities for these agreements as of December 31, 20192021, and 2018.2020.

 

F-19


 

 

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Litigation

 

As previously reported, on July 3, 2018, we commenced a lawsuit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the company’s former director and principal executive officer George Farley (“Farley”) and AnneMarieCo LLC (“AMC”).

The parties settled the lawsuit allegesvia a written settlement agreement dated September 24, 2020. Under the agreement, 20,000,000 of the 25,000,000 shares originally issued to Farley (20,000,000 of which were transferred to AMC) were invalidated, the remaining 5,000,000 shares being deemed valid under Section 205 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The agreement calls for the company to repurchase the remaining 5,000,000 shares at a price of $0.30 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $1,500,000. The agreement also provided for the release and return to the following six causescompany of action:

1.Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty against George Farley
2.Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Care against George Farley
3.Aiding and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty against AMC
4.Conversion against George Farley
5.Fraudulent Transfer against George Farley and AMC
6.Injunctive Relief against George Farley and AMC

This report provides an update on the progress of the litigation.

In connection with the lawsuit, the company requested a temporary restraining order prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock which the company alleges were improperly issued. On July 20, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery, Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves presiding, entered a “status quo” order upon the stipulation of the parties, whereby Mr. Farley and AMC agreed not to transfer, alienate or sell any of their shares pending a ruling on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

On July 26, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling order setting dates and deadlines for, among other matters, a hearing and briefing schedule onfunds in the amount of $582,377.26, plus interest, securing the bond posted by the company would be required to post to maintain the “status quo” order through the preliminary injunction hearing, a hearing and briefing schedule on the motion for a preliminary injunction, and a discovery schedule.

Also, in connection with the lawsuit, on August 8, 2018, the company filed a motion to disqualify Mr. Farley’s attorney, Ryan Whalen, who had previously represented the company.

On August 14, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order requiring the company to post a bond in the total amount of $200,446.52. On August 21, 2018, the company posted the bond via Atlantic Specialty Insurance company acting as surety. Pursuant to the contract between the company and Atlantic Specialty Insurance company, the company deposited $200,446.52 in cash as collateral for the surety agreement.

On August 23, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery court extended the hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction to October 23, 2018, and simultaneously ordered an increase in the bond amount of $55,446.52. On August 30, 2018, the company posted the increased bond amount, again with Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company acting as surety, and deposited the additional $55,446.52 in cash with the surety.

On September 7, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order setting a briefing schedule on the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.

On September 10, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered an order governing the production and exchange of confidential documents and information among the parties in discovery.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In another Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 13, 2018, the company updated the status of the litigation to include events that occurred up to that date. This report further updates the progress of the litigation.

On October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered a scheduling order continuing the hearing date on the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants George Farley and AMC to December 14, 2018.

The October 16, 2018 order also required the company to increase its bond amount by an additional $185,301.86 ($80,301.86 for AMC and $105,000.00 for Mr. Farley) to account for the continued hearing date. On October 24, 2018, the company posted the additional bond amount of $185,301.86.

On October 16, 2018, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order denying the company’s motion to disqualify Mr. Whalen.

On January 23, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a Memorandum Opinion, granting a preliminary injunction prohibiting Mr. Farley and AMC from selling their 25 million shares of the company’s common stock, which the company alleges were improperly issued. On January 24, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a revised Memorandum Opinion correcting calculations regarding the increased bond amount.

In granting the preliminary injunction, the Court found that the company met “its considerable burden” of demonstrating it was likely to win its lawsuit against Mr. Farley and AMC. Specifically, the Court found it was “reasonably probable” Mr. Farley had unlawfully issued the 25 million shares without proper authorization, Mr. Farley had breached his duty of loyalty to the company, Mr. Farley was unlikely to prove the stock issuance was procedurally or substantively “fair” to the company, and Mr. Farley had fraudulently transferred 20 million of the shares to AMC. Finally, the Court ruled because Farley and AMC’s 25 million shares represented approximately one eighth of the company’s outstanding ownership, the injunction was necessary to protect the company’s capital structure, ability to attract new investors, ability to raise new capital and continue deployment of its plans now underway to revitalize its business.

In its Memorandum Opinion, the Court also required that the company post additional bond money, bringing the total cash collateral for the surety agreement to $582,377.26. The company posted the additional bond amount, and deposited the additional cash amount with the surety, on January 29, 2019.

On March 4, 2019, the company filed an amended complaint adding claims against Mr. Farley concerning loans Mr. Farley caused the company take from PowerUp Lending Group Ltd. and Auctus Fund LLC from September 2017 through March 2018. Mr. Farley responded to the amended complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the lawsuit based on Delaware Court of Chancery Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(7). On September 28, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court denied this motion.

On July 7, 2019, the company filed a motion to reduce or eliminate the cash bond requirement. As previously reported, the cash bond was required by the Delaware Chancery Court. On September 30, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court denied the motion.

On July 19, 2019, Mr. Farley and AMC filed answers and amended counter claims in response to the Company’s amended complaint. The amended counter claims add claims under Delaware General Corporate Law section 205, seeking to validate the stock issuances at issue in the litigation. The agreement also contains standard mutual general release and confidentiality provisions. Approximately, $206,000 accrued compensation was forgone as per settlement agreement was shown as gain on settlement.

 

On July 29, 2019, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a scheduling order which, among other deadlines, rescheduled the trial date to begin on January 21, 2020. However, recently the judge presiding in the case, Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves, was appointed and confirmed to the Delaware Supreme Court. Though no formal order has yet issued, the company expects the trial date to be postponed to mid-2020.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On September 26, 2019, the company filed a motion for partial summary judgment concerning the issuance of company stock to Mr. Farley without having been authorized by a quorum of the board of directors. The previous hearing date of November 20, 2019, was postponed while the case awaited a new judge assignment.

The case was reassigned to Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster. On January 14, 2020, Vice Chancellor Laster held a scheduling conference. On January 29, 2020, the Delaware Chancery Court entered a scheduling order setting the trial date for July 20, 2020.

In a related matter, on February 8, 2019, the company filed a complaint against Stein Riso Mantel McDonough, LLP (“Stein Riso”), its former counsel, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York allegingYork. The parties settled the following:lawsuit via a written settlement agreement dated October 2, 2020. Pursuant to the agreement, Stein Riso paid the company three million dollars ($3,000,000) and returned to the company ten million (10,000,000) shares of the company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. Stein Riso entered into the Settlement Agreement without any admission of liability. The parties filed a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to all claims asserted or which could have been asserted in the lawsuit. The agreement also contains standard mutual general release and confidentiality provisions.

 

1.breach of fiduciary duty;
2.legal malpractice;
3.aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty;
4.voidance of fees under New York Rules of Professional Conduct 1.8;
5.violation of New York Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5;
6.securities fraud;
7.breach of contract; and
8.unjust enrichment.

The complaint against Stein Riso followed the issuance, on January 23, 2019, of a Memorandum Opinion granting the company’s motion for a preliminary injunction by the Delaware Court of Chancery in the case against George Farley and AMC. Stein Riso has responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company amended its complaint in response. On July 31, 2019, Stein Riso responded to the company’s amended complaint by filing another motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The company filed an opposition to this motion on August 14, 2019. Stein Riso filed a reply brief on September 13, 2019. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the motion.

On July 3, 2019, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and its partner, Ryan Whalen counsel for defendants, George Farley and AnneMarie Co. LLC,filed a complaint in the litigation brought by the company and pending in Delaware, filed a claim in theUnited States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the company, its directors, officers, attorneys and a consultant. The action allegesalleged libel, securities fraud and related claims. The company believes that this suit lacks merit and intends to dispute these allegations. The company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on October 24, 2019. On December 13, 2019, Gusrae Kaplan and Mr. Whalen filed an opposition to the Company’scompany’s motion. On January 10, 2020, the company filed a reply brief. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the motion. On August 5, 2021, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of the action without prejudice.

 

On September 24, 2019,June 15, 2020, Grace A.C. Dearmin, as the Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Carr Dearmin, filed a cross-complaint against the company and company directors Jonathan Barcklow and Bradford Adamczyk, alleging causes of action against them for Breach of Contract and Conversion. The causes of action against the company allege that the company’s board of directors voted to compensate its former CEO and director, Thomas Dearmin, as reflected in board meeting minutes dated May 11, 2018, and June 25, 2018, but failed to pay compensation owed to Mr. Dearmin. These causes of action further allege that, if incentive milestones of the company’s stock price were reached, Mr. Dearmin’s estate is owed up to 5 million shares of company common stock, or the current monetary value of that stock. On November 17, 2020, the company, Mr. Barcklow and Mr. Adamczyk filed motions to dismiss the cross-complaint against them on substantive and jurisdictional grounds. On February 8, 2021, the court granted the motion to dismiss on personal jurisdiction grounds as to the company, Mr. Barcklow and Mr. Adamczyk.

On January 15, 2021, the company filed a complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of Common PleasNew York, against Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and Ryan Whalen for malpractice and breach of New York Rules of Professional Conduct by both parties as former counsel to the company. On May 28, 2021, Gusrae, Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 25, 2021, the company filed an opposition to the motion. On July 13, 2021, Gusrae Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed their reply brief. The United States District Court has not yet ruled on the motion.

On September 7, 2021, Gusrae Kaplan & Nusbaum and its partner Ryan Whalen filed a complaint in the CountyNew York Supreme Court against the company, its directors, officers, attorneys and a consultant, alleging a single claim for defamation per se based on the same conduct underlying their claim of Beaufort, South Carolina,libel in their voluntarily dismissed federal court action. The company filed a motion to preventdismiss the sale of certain property located there (or incomplaint on October 29, 2021, which motion included a request for sanctions for filing a frivolous complaint. Gusrae Kaplan & Nusbaum and Mr. Whalen filed their opposition to the alternative,company’s motion to require payment of proceeds from any sale ofdismiss on January 13, 2022. The company filed its reply brief on February 17, 2022. On March 9, 2022, the property into the registry ofcompany received notice that the court until a final decision is entered inhad scheduled oral arguments on the matter), in ordermotion to protect the company from having property disposed of. Effective January 8, 2020, this complaint was dismissed.dismiss for May 23, 2022.

 

As with any litigation, the company cannot predict the outcome with certainty, but the company expects to provide further updates on the status of the litigation as circumstances warrant.

 

We may, from time to time, be involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business.

 

F-22


 

 

APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.


NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 78 – INCOME TAXES

 

An analysis of the difference between the expected federal income tax for the years ended December 31, 20192021, and 2018,2020, and the effective income tax rate is as follows::

 

  2019     2018    
             
Taxes calculated at federal rate $(1,166,831)  21.0% $(631,627)  21.0%
State income tax, net of federal benefit  (38,304)  0.7%  (35,215)  1.2%
Change in Valuation Allowance  1,203,231   -21.7%  712,113   -23.7%
Prior period adjustment  -   0.0%  (88,626)  2.9%
Permenant items  1,904   0.0%  43,355   -1.4%
Provision (benefit) for taxes $-   0% $-   0%
  2021  2020 
Noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities):      
Deferred Tax Assets $    $   
Accrued Compensation  1,895,848   1,380,954.94 
Fixed assets and intangibles  (114,167)  (70,473.82)
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards and Credits  15,070,176   14,378,365 
Total Deferred Tax Assets $16,851,857  $15,688,846 
         
Valuation allowance  (16,851,857)  (15,688,846)
         
Net deferred tax / (liabilities) $-  $- 

 

Tax effects of temporary differences at December 31, 20192021 and December 31, 20182020 are as follows:

 

  2019  2018 
Noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities):      
Deferred Tax Assets      
Accrued compensation $740,442  $88,789 
Fixed assets  (9,095)  - 
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards and Credits  14,494,408   13,933,735 
Total Deferred Tax Assets $15,225,755  $14,022,524 
         
Valuation allowance  (15,225,755)  (14,022,524)
Net deferred tax / (liabilities) $-  $- 

  2021  2020 
Taxes calculated at federal rate $(1,139,345)  21.0% $(634,101)  21.0%
State income tax, net of federal benefit  (195,688)  3.6%  (90,903)  3.8%
Change in Valuation Allowance  1,163,011   -21.4%  463,091   -21.7%
Expiration of tax attributes  139,331   -2.6%  161,254   -3.1%
Prior period adjustment  48,152   -0.9%  (49,105)  0.0%
Permanent Items  (15,460)  0.3%  149,763   0.0%
Provision (benefit) for taxes $(0)  0.0% $(0)  0.0%

  

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed by applying the federal and state income tax rates in effect to the gross amounts of temporary differences and other tax attributes, such as net operating loss carry-forwards. In assessing if the deferred tax assets will be realized, the company considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of these deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the period in which these deductible temporary differences reverse. During the year ended December 31, 2019,2021, the deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance increased by $1,203,000 primarily$1,163,011 mainly as a result of current year tax loss.

 

As of December 31, 2019,2021, we have cumulative federal and Arizona net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $65.1$67.2 million and $6.5$9.6 million, respectively, which can be used to offset future income subject to taxes. Of the $65.1$67.2 million, of Federal net operating loss carryforwards, $59.3$57.8 begin to expire in 2020.2021. The remaining balance of $5.8$9.4 million is limited in annual usage of 80% of current years taxable income but do not have an expiration. Arizona net operating loss carryforwards beginbegan to expire in 2020.2021. In addition, there are federal net operating loss carryforwards isof approximately $27.0 million from USHG related to pre-merger losses. We also have pre-merger federal capital loss carryforwards of approximately $520,000.

 

As of December 31, 2019,2021, we had cumulative unused research and development tax credits of approximately $239,000 and $340,000, which can be used to reduce future federal and Arizona income taxes, respectively. As of December 31, 2019,2021, we have cumulative unused federal minimum tax credit carryforwards from USHG of approximately $244,000. The federal minimum tax credit carryforwards are not subject to expiration under current federal tax law.

 

Utilization of our USHG pre-merger net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits is subject to substantial annual limitations due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. Such an annual limitation could result in the expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards before utilization.


APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

We have unrecognized tax benefits attributable to losses and minimum tax credit carryforwards that were incurred by USHG prior to the merger in March 2004 as follows:

 

Balance at December 31, 2016 $9,635,824 
Additions related to prior year tax positions  - 
Additions related to current year tax positions  - 
Reductions related to prior year tax positions and settlements    
Balance at December 31, 2017 $9,635,824 
     
Additions related to prior year tax positions  - 
Additions related to current year tax positions  - 
Reductions related to prior year tax positions and settlements  - 
Balance at December 31, 2018 $9,635,824 

Balance at December 31, 2019 $9,635,824 
Additions related to prior year tax positions  - 
Additions related to current year tax positions  - 
Reductions related to prior year tax positions and settlements    
Balance at December 31, 2020 $9,635,824 
Additions related to prior year tax positions  - 
Additions related to current year tax positions  - 
Reductions related to prior year tax positions and settlements  - 
Balance at December 31, 2021 $9,635,824 

 

These benefits are not recognized as a result of uncertainty regarding the utilization of the loss carryforwards and minimum tax credits. If in the future we utilize the attributes and resolve the uncertainty in our favor, the full amount will favorably impact our effective income tax rate.

 

The company considers the U.S. and Arizona to be major tax jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2019,2020, for federal tax purposes the tax years 2014, 2015, 20162019-2021 and 2017, 2018 for Arizona the tax years 20142016 through 20192021 remain open to examination. The company currently does not expect any material changes to unrecognized tax positions within the next twelve months.

 

We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019,2021, and 2018,2020, we had no accrued interest or penalties related to our unrecognized tax benefits.

NOTE 89 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT

 

In January 2020, the company received $603,000 from five non-affiliated individuals based on subscription agreements with the company for which the company issued 2,010,000 shares of its common stock.

In January 2020, the company issued 25,000 shares in response to a non-affiliated warrant holder exercising a warrant.

In February 2020, the company received $510,000 from a non-affiliated individual based on a subscription agreement with the company for which the company issued 1,700,000 shares of its common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the company received $2,350,000 from eleven non-affiliated individuals based on 10% Promissory Notes (“Notes”). In the first three months of 2020, two notes with principal balances of $50,000 each were paid off for a total of $108,000.

 Effective March 4, 2020, Applied Energetics, Inc. entered into the Phase I Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) contract referred to in its prior Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2020 with the United States Army. The contract is for the development of Standoff Electronic Denial systems. Phase I is to be completed within the first 90 days. The company will collaborate with the Laser Plasma Laboratory (LPL) at the University of Central Florida (UCF) in performing its research under the contract. The total contract amount for Phase I is $165,920.

Multiple contract proposals were submitted to various government agencies in 2019 and 2020. Due to the COVID-19 related closures of multiple agencies and work-from-home orders across various regions of the United States, we anticipate that reviews and funding decisions on these proposals might be delayed longer than anticipated as resources are focused on other matters within the government. 

The company’s management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after December 31, 2019,2021, the date of our most recent balance sheet, through the date our financial statements were issued.

 

In January 2022, we issued two options totaling 1,390,000 shares, each with a life of 10 years and an exercise price of $2.40.

 

F-24Subsequent to year end, the Company issued 130,416 shares of common stock in relation to a 2019 compensation agreement.

Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2021, the company entered into a $175,434.65 financing agreement to finance its Directors and Officers insurance premiums. 

F-22

 

iso4217:USD xbrli:shares