UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 (Mark One)
þ    RAnnual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012
OR
oTransition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____
Commission File No. 1-6651
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015
OR
    £  Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission File No. 1-6651


 
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indiana35-1160484
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
1069 State Route 46 East
Batesville, IndianaTwo Prudential Plaza, Suite 4100
Chicago, IL
47006-883560601
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (812) 934-7777(312) 819-7200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, without par valueNew York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes R                       No £

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes £                       No R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes R                       No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes R                       No £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. £R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
            Large accelerated filer R       Accelerated filer £       Non-accelerated filer £       Smaller reporting company £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes £                       No R

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting common equity, held by non-affiliates of the registrant, was approximately $2.0$2.8 billion, based on the closing sales price of $33.41$49.00 per share as of March 31, 20122015 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter). There is no non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates.

The registrant had 60,808,64765,169,068 shares of its common stock, without par value, outstanding as of November 6, 2012.
12, 2015.

Documents incorporated by reference.

Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 8, 201315, 2016 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 


 
 

 

HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 20122015

TABLETABLE OF CONTENTS

  
Page 
PART I
 3
Item 1.    3
Item 1A.    89
Item 1B.  1214
Item 2.  1315
Item 3.  1316
Item 4.  1316
   
PART II
Item 5.  1417
Item 6.  1719
Item 7.  1820
Item 7A.  3640
Item 8.  3741
Item 9.  7880
Item 9A.7880
Item 9B.  7880
 
PART III
 
PART III
Item 10.  7981
Item 11.  7981
Item 12.  7981
Item 13.  7981
Item 14.  7981
   
PART IV
Item 15.  8082
    8284

 
2



DISCLOSUREDISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meanings of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding our future plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations, representations and projections.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.


General

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (the “Company,” “Hill-Rom,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) (formerly known as Hillenbrand Industries, Inc.) was incorporated on August 7, 1969 in the State of Indiana and is headquartered in Batesville, Indiana.Chicago, Illinois. We are a leading worldwide manufacturer and provider ofglobal medical technologies and related services for the health care industry, including patient support systems, safe mobility and handling solutions, non-invasive therapeutic products for a variety of acute and chronic medical conditions, medical equipment rentals, surgical products and information technology solutions. Our comprehensive product and service offerings are used bycompany with approximately 10,000 employees worldwide. We partner with health care providers across the healthin more than 100 countries by focusing on patient care continuumsolutions that improve clinical and aroundeconomic outcomes in five core areas: Advancing Mobility, Wound Care and Prevention, Clinical Workflow, Surgical Safety and Efficiency, and Respiratory Health. Around the world, in hospitals, extended care facilitiesHill-Rom's people, products, and home care settings, to enhance the safetyprograms work towards one mission: Enhancing outcomes for patients and quality of patient care.  In February 2012, we acquired Völker, a German manufacturer and distributor of patient support surfaces.  In July 2012, we acquired Aspen Surgical, a U.S.-based manufacturer of surgical products including the Bard-Parker® line of blades and scalpels.their caregivers.

Segment Information

We operate and manage our business within three reportable segments, each of which is generally aligned by region or product type. The segments are as follows:

●    ·
North America - sells and rents our patient support and near-patient technologies and services, as well as our health information technologyclinical workflow solutions, in the U.S. and Canada.
 
●    ·
Surgical and Respiratory Care - sells and rents our surgical and respiratory care products in all settingsglobally.
 
●    ·
International - sells and rents similar products as our North America segment in regions outside of the U.S. and CanadaCanada.

Net revenues,revenue, segment profitability and other measures of segment reporting for each reporting segment are set forth in Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. No single customer accounts for more than 10ten percent of our revenuerevenue.

In September 2015, we acquired Welch Allyn Holdings, Inc. (“Welch Allyn”). The results of Welch Allyn’s operations for the 22 days under our ownership are reported as a reconciling item in any segment.our segment disclosures for the year ended September 30, 2015.

Products and Services

We have extensive distribution capabilities and broad reach across all health care settings. We sellprimarily operate in the following channels: (1) sales and rent primarilyrentals of products to acute and extended care health care facilities worldwide through both a direct sales force and distributors, but we also selldistributors; (2) sales and rentals of products directly to patients in the home.home; and (3) sales into primary care facilities (primarily Welch Allyn products). Through our network of approximately 170160 North American and 3450 international service centers, and approximately 1,200 North American and 340 international1,500 service professionals, we are able to provide technical support and services and rapidly deliver our products to customers on an as-needed basis, providing our customers flexibility to purchase or rent ourselect products. This extensive network is critical to serving our customers and securing contracts with Group Purchasing Organizations (“GPOs”) and integrated delivery networks (“IDNs”).

3


Our products and services are outlined below. Except where noted, weall of our business segments generally sell products and services and rent products from each of our product categories in all of our business segments.categories.

Patient Support SystemsAdvancing Mobility. Our innovative patient supportcare systems include a variety of bed systems, along with integratedsuch as Medical Surgical (“MedSurg”) beds, Intensive Care Unit (“ICU”) beds, and non-integrated therapeutic bed surfaces, that are rentedBariatric patient beds, as well as mobility solutions (such as lifts and sold by our North America and International segments.other devices used to safely move patients). These patient supportcare systems can be designed for use in high, mid, and low acuity settings, depending on the specific design options.options, and are built to reduce patient falls and caregiver injuries and improve caregiver efficiency. Our advanced patient supportcare systems can also provide patient data reporting, (e.g., weight and therapy statistics); patient safety alarms and caregiver alerts concerning such things as bed exit, bed height, patient positioning; wound healing and prevention; pulmonary treatment;positioning, point of care controls; andcontrols, patient turn assist and upright positioning. Supporting solutions within the patient/resident room include architectural products (such as headwalls) and health care furniture. These products are sold by our North America and International segments, primarily to acute and extended care facilities worldwide. Approximately 53, 5157, 67 and 4970 percent of our revenuesrevenue during fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, were derived from patient support systems.advancing mobility products and services.

Non-Invasive Therapeutic ProductsWound Care and Prevention. We rent and sell non-invasive therapeutic products and surfaces designed for the prevention and treatment of a variety of acute and chronic medical conditions, including pulmonary, wound and bariatric conditions. These products are rented and sold by our North America and International segments, primarily in the U.S., Canada and Europe, with the exception of our respiratory care products.  Our respiratory care products are sold by our Surgical and Respiratory Care and International segments.  Approximately 25, 29 and 30 percent of our revenues were derived from these therapeutic products in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010.

Europe. Medical Equipment Management and Contract Services. We provide rentals and health care provider asset management services for a wide variety of moveable medical equipment also known as MME,(“MME”), such as ventilators, defibrillators, intravenous pumps and patient monitoring equipment in our North America segment. In addition, we also sell equipment service contracts for our capital equipment, primarily in the U.S. Approximately 8, 9, 10 and 1011 percent of our revenuesrevenue during fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, were derived from thesewound care and prevention products and services in fiscal 2012, 2011 and 2010.services.

Patient Environment and Mobilization Solutions. These products include mobility solutions (such as lifts and other devices used to safely move patients), architectural products (such as headwalls and power columns) and health care furniture.  Patient environment and mobility solutions products are sold by our North America and International segments, primarily to acute and extended care health care facilities worldwide.

Health Information Technology Solutions.Clinical Workflow. We also develop and market a variety of communications technologies and software solutions. These are designed to improve patient safety and efficiency at the point of care by, among other things, enabling patient-to-staff and staff-to-staff communications, and aggregating and delivering patient data.data, tracking staff and assets, and monitoring hand hygiene compliance. The NaviCare® Platform is the infrastructure Hill-Rom uses to support multiple clinical solutions and applications, including nurse call, asset tracking, staff and patient locating and hand-hygiene monitoring. We believe that our ability to integrate multiple applications using one primary infrastructure is a significant advantage for us versus our competitors in the clinical workflow product category today. These products are sold mainly to our North America customers. This product category also includes our Welch Allyn products, which help caregivers assess their patients quickly, easily, safely, and accurately. We also see exciting opportunities to integrate even more of Welch Allyn’s technologies and patient data in the care environment to further enhance our Clinical Workflow product offerings. Welch Allyn products are sold globally.

Surgical ProductsSafety and Efficiency. We offer surgical tables, lights, and pendants utilized within the operating room setting. We also offer a range of positioning devices for use in shoulder, hip, spinal and lithotomy surgeries as well as platform-neutral positioning accessories for nearly every model of operating room table. In addition, via our acquisition of Aspen Surgical, we offer operating room disposablesurgical safety and accessory products such as scalpel and blade, andlight handle systems, disposable scalpels, skin markers and other disposable products. The products offered within this category are primarily recurring, consumable revenue streams. These products are sold by our Surgical and Respiratory Care segment. In 2014, we acquired Trumpf Medical, a worldwide leader in medical products technology distinguished by high-quality German engineering, a history of innovation, and a dedication to total customer satisfaction. Trumpf offers surgical tables, surgical and examination lights, surgical pendants and video solutions. Approximately 21, 13 and 10 percent of our revenue during fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, were derived from surgical safety and efficiency products.

Respiratory Health. We offer therapeutic products that provide bronchial hygiene (airway clearance) for acute and home care patients. Some of the key products include:  The Vest® Airway Clearance System, designed to assist patients in the mobilization of retained blockages that, if not removed, may lead to increased rates of respiratory infection, hospitalization, and reduced lung function; the VitalCough® System, a non-invasive therapy that stimulates a cough to remove secretions in patients with compromised peak cough flow; and the MetaNeb® Systems, a triple-therapy system indicated for the mobilization of secretions, lung expansion therapy and aerosol delivery.  These products are sold by our Surgical and Respiratory Care segment.

Raw Materials

Principal materials used in our products for each business segment include carbon steel, aluminum, stainless steel, wood and laminates, petroleum based products, such as foams and plastics, and other materials, substantially all of which are available from several sources. Motors and electronic controls for electrically operated beds and certain other components are purchased from one or more manufacturers.

4

Prices fluctuate for raw materials and sub-assemblies used in our products based on a number of factors beyond our control. Specifically, over the past several years, the fluctuating prices of certain raw materials, including metals, fuel, plastics and other petroleum basedpetroleum-based products in particular, and fuel related delivery costs, had a direct effect on our profitability. Although we generally have not engaged in hedging transactions with respect to raw material purchases, we have entered into fixed price supply contracts at times.

Most of our extended contracts with hospital GPOs and other customers for the sale of products in North America permit us to institute annual list price increases, although we may not be able to raise prices sufficiently to offset all raw material cost inflation.

Competition

In all our business segments, we compete on the basis of clinical expertise and resulting product clinical utility and ability to produce favorable outcomes, as well as value, quality, customer service, innovation and breadth and depth of product offerings. As our business segments generally sell products and services across our product categories, we evaluate our competition based on our product categories, rather than our business segments.

The following table displays our significant competitors with respect to each product category:

Product Categories 
 
Competitors
Patient Support Systems
Stryker Corporation
ArjoHuntleigh (Division of Getinge AB)
Linet
Stiegelmeyer
Invacare
Joerns Healthcare
Non-Invasive Therapeutic Products
SIZEWise Rentals, LLC
RecoverCare, LLC
ArjoHuntleigh (Division of Getinge AB)
Medical Equipment Management and Contract Services
Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
Freedom Medical, Inc.
Patient Environment andAdvancing Mobility Solutions 
ArjoHuntleigh (Division of Getinge AB)
Guldmann
AmicoInvacare
Modular ServicesJoerns Healthcare
Linet
Herman Miller HealthcareStiegelmeyer
Stryker Corporation
   
Health Information Technology SolutionsWound Care and Prevention 
Rauland-Borg CorporationArjoHuntleigh (Division of Getinge AB)
Ascom Holding
West-Com Nurse Call Systems,Freedom Medical, Inc.
Intego Systems, Inc.RecoverCare, LLC/Joerns Healthcare
SIZEWise Rentals, LLC
SimplexGrinnell LP
Jeron Electronic Systems,Universal Hospital Services, Inc.
   
Surgical ProductsClinical Workflow 
MizuhoOSIAscom Holding
Tenet Medical (part of Smith & Nephew)Covidien, Ltd.
Schuerch MedicalExergen Corporation
GE Healthcare
Heine Optotechnik
Omron Healthcare
Philips
Rauland-Borg Corporation
Riester
Surgical Safety and Efficiency
Action Medical
Myco MedicalDeRoyal
Draeger
Maquet (Division of Getinge AB)
MizuhoOSI
Skytron
Steris
Stryker Corporation
Swann-Morton
Respiratory Health
Electromed, Inc.
Respironics (Division of Philips)
Respirtech

Additionally, we compete with a large number of smaller and regional manufacturers.

Regulatory Matters

FDA Regulation. We design, manufacture, install and distribute medical devices that are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) in the U.S. and similar agencies in other countries. The regulations and standards of these agencies evolve over time and require us to make changes in our manufacturing processes and quality systems to remain in compliance. The FDA’s Quality System regulations and the regulatory equivalents under the Medical Device Directive in the European Union set forth standards for our product design and manufacturing processes, require the maintenance of certain records and provide for inspections of our facilities. From time to time, the FDA performs routine inspections of our facilities and may inform us of certain deficiencies in our processes or facilities. We currently haveIn 2012, we received an outstanding FDA warning letter forwith respect to our Batesville facility thatfacility. After making the necessary improvements in our quality systems and processes, the warning letter was receivedlifted in 2012.2015. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for additional information. In addition, there are also certain state and local government requirements that must be complied with in the manufacturing and marketing of our products.
 
 
Environmental. We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations relating to environmental and health and safety concerns, including the handling, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous materials used in or derived from our manufacturing processes. When necessary, we provide for reserves in our financial statements for environmental matters. Based on the nature and volume of materials involved regarding onsite impacts and other currently known information, weWe do not expect the remediation costs for any onsite environmental issues in which we are currently involved to exceed $2$3 million.

Health Care Regulations. The health care industry continues to undergo significant change. In March 2010, comprehensive health care reform legislation was signed into law through the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (H.R. 3590) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (H.R. 4872).Act. The health care industry continues to undergo significant change as the law is implemented. In addition to health care reform, Medicare, Medicaid and managed care organizations, such as health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations, traditional indemnity insurers and third-party administrators are under increasing pressure to control costs and limit utilization, while improving quality and health care outcomes. These objectives are being advanced through a variety of reform initiatives including: accountable care organizations, value based purchasing, bundling initiatives, competitive bidding programs, etc. We are also subject to a number of other regulations related to the sale and distribution of health care products. The potential impact of these changesregulations to our business is discussed further in Item 1A. Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Product Development

Most of our products and product improvements have been developed internally. We maintain close working relationships with various medical professionals who assist in product research and development. New and improved products play a critical role in our sales growth. We continue to place emphasis on the development of proprietary products and product improvements to complement and expand our existing product lines. Our significant research and development activities are located in Acton, Massachusetts; Batesville, Indiana; Beaverton, Oregon; Cary, North Carolina; Skaneateles Falls, New York; Lulea, Sweden; Montpelier and Pluvigner, France; Singapore; and Singapore.Saalfeld and Witten, Germany.

Research and development is expensed as incurred. Research and development expense for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, was $66.9$91.8 million, $63.8$71.9 million and $58.3$70.2 million.

In addition, certain software development technology costs are capitalized as intangibles and are amortized over a period of three to five years once the software is ready for its intended use. The amounts capitalized during fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 were approximately $2.3$2.6 million, $2.1$2.6 million and $4.8$2.4 million.

Patents and Trademarks

We own, and from time-to-time license, a number of patents on our products and manufacturing processes, but we do not believe any single patent or related group of patents is of material significance to any business segment or our business as a whole. We also own a number of trademarks and service marks relating to our products and product services. Except for the marks “Hill-Rom”“Hill-Rom®”, “Bard-Parker®”, and “Bard-Parker®“Welch Allyn®, we do not believe any single trademark or service mark is of material significance to any business segment or our business as a whole.

Foreign Operations and Export Sales

Information about our foreign operations is set forth in tables relating to geographic information in Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included herein under Part II, Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.of this Form 10-K.

Employees

At September 30, 2012,2015, we had approximately 6,95010,000 employees worldwide. Approximately 2407 percent of our employees work in our logistics and manufacturing operations in the U.S. under collective bargaining agreements. We are also subject to various collective bargaining arrangements or national agreements outside the U.S. The collective bargaining agreement at our primary U.S. manufacturing facility will expireexpires in January 2013, and we are currently in negotiations to enter a new agreement.2016. We have not experienced a work stoppage in the U.S. in over 40 years, and we believe that our employee relations are satisfactory.

6


Executive Officers

The following sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers. The term of office for each executive officer expires on the date his or her successor is chosen and qualified. No director or executive officer has a “family relationship” with any other director or executive officer of the Company, as that term is defined for purposes of this disclosure requirement. There is no understanding between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which the executive officer was selected.
6

 
John J. Greisch, 57,60, was elected President and Chief Executive Officer of Hill-Rom in January 2010. Mr. Greisch was most recently President, International Operations for Baxter International, Inc., a position he held since 2006. Prior to this, he held several other positions with Baxter, serving as Baxter's Chief Financial Officer and as President of Baxter's BioScience division.

Mark Guinan, 50,Carlos Alonso, 56, was elected as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerPresident, Hill-Rom International in December 2010.April 2015. Before joining Hill-Rom, Mr. Guinan previously held a variety of positions with Johnson & Johnson, most recentlyAlonso served as the Chief Procurement Officer since October 2009.President and CEO of the Esaote Group, a medical imaging leader based in Genova, Italy. Prior to that, hethe Esaote Group, Mr. Alonso served as Vicethe CEO of Esteve Pharmaceuticals based in Barcelona, Spain, and held various leadership roles of increasing responsibility with Baxter International, Inc. over the course of 15 years, including serving as Global President - Finance, Global Pharmaceutical Group, and Vice President - Finance, Global R&D and Business Operations. of the Renal Division.

Andreas Frank, 36, joined Hill-Rom39, was elected as Senior Vice President Corporate Development and Strategy in October 2011. Before joining Hill-Rom, Mr. Frank was Director Corporate Development at Danaher Corporation. Previously he worked in the Corporate Finance and Strategy practice at the consulting firm McKinsey & Company.

Alejandro Infante Saracho, 51, was elected Senior Vice President and President International for Hill-Rom effective May 2010. Before joining the Company, he spent more than 25 years with Hospira and Abbott serving in a number of executive positions, including President of the Americas, General Manager International Operations and Regional Director Latin America for Hospira.

Scott Jeffers, 42, was elected Senior Vice President, Global Supply Chain for Hill-Rom in September 2010.  Before joining Hill-Rom, he held a number of senior operational positions in GE Healthcare including General Manager of Global Lean Enterprise; General Manager of Global Supply Chain for Life Support Solutions; and General Manager of Global Sourcing & Operational Excellence for the Clinical Systems business.  Prior to joining GE, Mr. Jeffers was an officer in the United States Air Force.

Richard G. Keller, 51,54, was elected Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company effective August 2005. He had served as Executive Director - Controller of Hill-Rom since March 2004.

Brian Lawrence, 42, was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer for Hill-Rom effective December, 2010. Mr. Lawrence joined Hill-Rom from GE Healthcare, where he was Chief Technology Officer for Life Support Solutions and held a number of other leadership and innovation positions in GE's Global Research Center.

Susan R. Lichtenstein, 55,58, was elected Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary for Hill-Rom effective May 2010. Previously she was Corporate Vice President and General Counsel at Baxter International, where she was responsible for global legal matters, corporate communications and government affairs. Ms. Lichtenstein has informed the Company that she will be leaving the Company by the end of calendar year 2015.

Michael Macek, 40,Kenneth Meyers, 53, was elected Treasurer in March 2011. Mr. Macek held the position of Executive Director, Treasury for Hill-Rom since 2008, and a series of financial positions with Hill-Rom since 2005.

Michael Murphy, 48, was elected as the Senior Vice President, Quality Assurance/Regulatory Affairs effective July 11, 2012.  Mr. Murphy held the position of Vice President Quality Assurance & Regulatory Affairs for Hill-Rom since May 2011. Before joining Hill-Rom, he was at Baxter International, where he served as Vice President of Quality for Baxter's EMEA division, headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland, and as Vice President-Corporate Quality. Previously he held numerous QA/RA leadership roles at Boston Scientific and at Harmac Medical Products.

Michael Oliver, 59, was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer for Hill-Rom in March 2011. Prior toeffective September 2015. Before joining Hill-Rom Mr. Oliverhe was theSenior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer for Pactiv Corporation and from 1997at Hospira, Inc. Previously, he was a partner at Mercer / Oliver Wyman Consulting. Prior to 2008Mercer / Oliver Wyman, he wasserved as Senior Vice President, Human Resources, for Brady Corporation.Starbucks International.

Gregory Pritchard, 54, was named Senior Vice President and President, Surgical and Respiratory Care in July 2012. Previously, Mr. Pritchard served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Aspen Surgical.  He has more than 25 years of experience in the health care industry, serving in management positions at American Hospital Supply, Baxter, Allegiance Healthcare and Cardinal Health.

Blair A. (Andy) Rieth, Jr., 54, was hired as Vice President of Investor Relations of the Company in June 2006.  Prior to joining us, he was the Investor Relations Officer of Guidant Corporation from 2000 to 2006.
Alton Shader, 39,42, was elected Senior Vice President and President, North America of the CompanyFront Line Care in July 2012.September 2015. He had served as Senior Vice President and President, North America since July 2012 and previously as Senior Vice President and President, Post-Acute Care with Hill-Rom since July 2011. Before joining Hill-Rom, Mr. Shader was General Manager of Renal at Baxter International.International, Inc. Previously, he served as General Manager for Baxter Ireland and held senior marketing positions in Baxter's operations in Zurich and in California.

Taylor Smith, 55, was elected as Senior Vice President and President, Surgical and Respiratory Care in November 2013. Before joining Hill-Rom, Mr. Smith served as Senior Vice President and General Manager for Cardinal Health’s Orthopedic Products and Services group. Previously he held numerous leadership positions of increasing responsibility at Cardinal Health over the past 13 years.

Carlyn D. Solomon, 53, was elected Chief Operating Officer of Hill-Rom in November, 2014. Mr. Solomon was most recently the Corporate Vice President, Critical Care & Vascular Business Units of Edwards Lifesciences since 2006, and was VP of Corporate Strategy and GM of Cardiac Surgery Systems Business of Edwards Lifesciences from 2005 to 2006.

Steven J. Strobel, 57, was elected Senior Vice President in November 2014 and Chief Financial Officer in December, 2014. Before joining Hill-Rom, Mr. Strobel was President of McGough Road Advisors, a corporate finance consulting firm, from 2012 to 2014 and previously Chief Financial Officer of BlueStar Energy, an independent retail energy services company, from 2009 to 2012. Prior to BlueStar, he served as Treasurer and Corporate Controller at Motorola, and in the same positions at Owens Corning. Mr. Strobel serves on the Board of Directors of Newell Rubbermaid Inc., where he chairs the Audit Committee.

7


Availability of Reports and Other Information

Our website is www.Hill-Rom.com. We make available on this website, free of charge, access to our annual, quarterly and current reports and other documents we file with, or furnish to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as soon as practicable after such reports or documents are filed or furnished. We also make available on our website position specifications for the Chairman, members of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer, our Code of Ethical Business Conduct (and any amendments or waivers), the Corporate Governance Standards of our Board of Directors and the charters of each of the standing committees of the Board of Directors. All of these documents are also available to shareholders in print upon request.

All reports filed with the SEC are also available via the SEC website, www.sec.gov, or may be read and copied at the SEC Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC  20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

8



Our business involves risks. The following information about these risks should be considered carefully together with the other information contained herein. The risks described below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks not currently known or deemed immaterial also may result in adverse effects on our business.

We face significant uncertainty in the industry due to government health care reform, changes in Medicare, Medicaid and other governmental medical program reimbursements, and we cannot predict how these reforms will impact our operating results.

In March 2010, the U.S. Congress adopted and President Obama signed into law comprehensive health care reform legislation through the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (H.R. 3590) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (H.R. 4872). We cannot predict with certainty what additional healthcare initiatives, if any, will be implemented at the federal or state level, or what the ultimate effect of federal health care reform or any future legislation or regulation will have on us. In addition, Medicare, Medicaid, and managed care organizations and foreign governments are increasing pressure to both control health care utilization and to limit reimbursement. Changes in reimbursement programs or their regulations, including retroactive and prospective rate and coverage criteria changes, competitive bidding for certain products and services, and other changes intended to reduce the program expenditures (domestically or internationally), could adversely affect the portions of our businesses that are dependent on third-party reimbursement.reimbursement or direct governmental payments. Moreover, to the extent that our customers experience reimbursement pressure resulting in lower revenue for them, their demand for our products and services may decrease. The impact of the above mentioned items could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and cash flows.

Failure by us or our suppliers to comply with the FDA regulations and similar foreign regulations applicable to the products we manufacture or distribute could expose us to enforcement actions or other adverse consequences.

We design, manufacture, install and distribute medical devices that are regulated by the FDA in the U.S. and similar agencies in other countries. Failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in future product recalls, injunctions preventing the shipment of products or other enforcement actions that could have a material adverse effect on our revenuesrevenue and profitability. OnIn March 6, 2012, we received a warning letter from the FDA following an inspection by the FDA at our Batesville, Indiana production facilities. AtUpon the closesuccessful completion of the inspection, the FDA issued a Form 483 identifying certain observed instances of non-compliance with FDA regulations.  The Warning letter reiterated the items raised in the Form 483 and also identified certain instances of non-compliance with FDA requirements regarding our advertising and promotion of certain products.  Although remediation efforts, are underway, we cannot assure you if or when we will address all matters in the warning letter to the FDA’s satisfaction.was lifted in September 2015. Additionally, certain of our suppliers are subject to FDA regulations, and the failure of these suppliers to comply with regulations could adversely affect us; as regulatory actions taken by the FDA against those manufacturers can result in product shortages, recalls or modifications.

We could be subject to substantial fines or damages and possible exclusion from participation in federal health care programs if we fail to comply with the laws and regulations applicable to our business.

We are subject to stringent laws and regulations at both the federal and state levels governing the participation of durable medical equipment suppliers in federal and state health care programs. In addition, in 2011 we recently entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Federal government, which imposes on us additional contractual obligations.

From time to time, the government seeks additional information related to our claims submissions, and in some instances government contractors perform audits of payments made to us under Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs. On occasion, these reviews identify overpayments for which we submit refunds. At other times, our own internal audits identify the need to refund payments. We anticipate that theThe frequency and intensity of the government audits and review processes has intensified and we expect this will intensifycontinue in the future, due to increased resources allocated to these activities at both the federal and state Medicaid level, and greater sophistication in data review techniques.

If we are deemed to have violated these laws and regulations, or are found to have violated our Corporate Integrity Agreement, we could be subject to substantial fines, or damages, and possible exclusion from participation in federal health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.Medicaid and possible recoupment of overpayments. While we believe that our practices materially comply with applicable state and federal requirements, the requirements may be interpreted in a manner inconsistent with our interpretation. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, even if inadvertent, could have a material adverse impact on our business.

We could be materially impacted if so-called “sequestration” goes into effect and federal spending reductions are implemented, or if Congress takes additional action to avoid sequestration being triggered.

9
The 2011 Budget Control Act called for a 12-member debt panel to develop and pass at least $1.2 trillion in federal spending cuts over 10 years.  However, since the panel failed to reach an agreement, the law, unless changed by Congress, will trigger billions of dollars in automatic cuts known as “sequestration” beginning in February 2013.  At this time, we are uncertain if sequestration will occur or if Congress will change the law. Should sequestration occur, we are unable to quantify whether the impact upon us will be material.  Moreover, if Congress does change the law and sequestration does not occur, we cannot predict the outcome of those changes or its impact on our results.

We participate in a highly competitive industry that is subject to the risk of declining demand and pricing pressures, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Demand for our products and services depend in large part on overall demand in the health care market. Additionally, with the health care market’s increased focus on hospital asset and resource efficiency as well as reimbursement constraints, spending for many of our products is on a long-term declining trend. Further, the competitive pressures in our industry could cause us to lose market share unless we increase our expenditures or reduce our prices, which would adversely impact our operating results. The nature of this highly competitive marketplace demands that we successfully introduce new products into the market in a cost effective manner (more fully detailed below). These factors, along with others, may result in significant shifts in market share among the industry's major participants, including us. Accordingly, if we are unable to effectively differentiate ourselves from our competitors in terms of both new products and diversification of our product portfolio through business acquisitions, then our market share, sales and profitability could be adversely impacted through lower volume or decreased prices.

Our future financial performance will depend in part on the successful introduction of new products into the marketplace on a cost-effective basis.

Our future financial performance will depend in part on our ability to influence, anticipate, identify and respond to changing consumer preferences and needs. We can provide no assurances that our new products will achieve the same degree of success as in the past. We may not correctly anticipate or identify trends in consumer preferences or needs, or may identify them later than competitors do. In addition, difficulties in manufacturing or in obtaining regulatory approvals may delay or prohibit introduction of new products into the marketplace. Further, we may not be able to develop and produce new products at a cost that allows us to meet our goals for profitability. Warranty claims and service costs relating to our products may be greater than anticipated, and we may be required to devote significant resources to address any quality issues associated with our new products, which could reduce the resources available for further new product development and other matters. In addition, the introduction of new products may also cause customers to defer purchases of existing products.

Failure to successfully introduce new products on a cost-effective basis, or delays in customer purchasing decisions related to the evaluation of new products, could cause us to lose market share and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

Further adverseAdverse developments in general domestic and worldwide economic conditions and instability and disruption of credit markets could have furtheran adverse effectseffect on our operating results, financial condition, or liquidity.

We are subject to risks arising from adverse changes in general domestic and global economic conditions, including recession or economic slowdown and disruption of domestic and international credit markets. The credit and capital markets experienced extreme volatility and disruption over the past several years, leading to periods of recessionary conditions and depressed levels of consumer and commercial spending. These recessionary conditions caused customers to reduce, modify, delay or cancel plans to purchase our products and services. If our customers continue to reduce investments in capital expenditures or utilize their limited capital funds to invest in products that we do not offer or that do not comprise a large percentage of our product portfolio, it could negatively impact our operating results. Moreover, even if our revenues remainrevenue remains constant, our profitability could decline if there is a shift to sales of product mix or geographic locations with less favorable margins. If worldwide economic conditions worsen, we would expect our customers to scrutinize costs resulting from pressures on operating margin due to rising supply costs, reduced investment income and philanthropic giving, increased interest expense, reimbursement pressure, reduced elective healthcare spending and uncompensated care.

We may not be able to grow if we are unable to successfully acquire and integrate, or form business relationships with, other companies.

We have in the past, and expect in the future, to grow our business through mergers, acquisitions and other similar business arrangements. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or business relationships, negotiate acceptable terms for such acquisitions or relationships or receive necessary financing on acceptable terms. Additionally, we may become responsible for liabilities associated with businesses that we acquire to the extent they are not covered by indemnification from the sellers or by insurance. Even if we are able to consummate acquisitions, such acquisitions could be dilutive to earnings, and we could overpay for such acquisitions. Additionally, we may not be fully successful in our integration efforts or fully realize expected benefits from the integration. Our integration efforts may divert management and other resources from other important matters, and we could experience delays or unusual expenses in the integration process, including intangible asset impairments which could result in significant charges in our Statements of Consolidated Income. Moreover, the margins for these companies may differ from our historical gross and operating margins resulting in a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

10

The assets in our pension plans are subject to market disruptions. In addition, our pension plans are underfunded.

Our primary pension plans investplan invests in a variety of equity and debt securities including securities that have been adversely affected by the disruption in the credit and capital markets.subject to market risks. Our pension plans were underfunded at September 30, 20122015 by approximately $81$96.4 million. Market volatility and disruption could cause further declines in asset values or fluctuations in assumptions used to value our liability and expenses. If this occurs, we may need to make additional pension plan contributions and our pension expense in future years may increase.

Our business is significantly dependent on major contracts with GPOs, IDNs, and IDNs.certain other distributors and purchasers.

A majority of our North American hospital sales and rentals are made pursuant to contracts with hospital GPOs. At any given time, we are typically at various stages of responding to bids and negotiating and renewing expiring GPO agreements. Failure to be included in certain of these agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business, including capital and rental revenues.revenue.

The contracting practices of GPOs change frequently to meet the needs of their member hospitals.  GPOs often offer committed programs or standardization programs, where one supplier may be chosen to serve designated members that elect to participate in the program.  Participation by us in such programs may requireoften requires increased discounting or restrictions on our ability to raise prices, and failure to participate or to be selected for participation in such programs may result in a reduction of sales to the member hospitals. In addition, the industry is showing an increased focus on contracting directly with health systems or IDNs (which typically represents influential members and owners of GPOs). IDNs and health systems often make key purchasing decisions and have influence over the GPO’s contract decisions. This presents an opportunity to have more contracts directly with customers, but these customers maydecisions, and often request additional discounts or other enhancements. In addition, certain other distributors and purchasers have similar processes to the GPOs and IDNs and failure to be included in agreements with these other purchasers could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Increased prices for, or unavailability of, raw materials or sub-assemblies used in our products could adversely affect profitability or revenues.revenue. In particular, our results of operations have been and could be further adversely affected by high prices for metals, fuel, plastics and other petroleum based products. We also procure several raw materials and sub-assemblies from single suppliers.

Our profitability is affected by the prices of the raw materials and sub-assemblies used in the manufacture of our products. These prices may fluctuate based on a number of factors beyond our control, including changes in supply and demand, general economic conditions, labor costs, fuel related delivery costs, competition, import duties, tariffs, currency exchange rates, and government regulation. Significant increases in the prices of raw materials or sub-assemblies that cannot be recovered through increases in the prices of our products could adversely affect our results of operations. There can be no assurance that the market placemarketplace will support higher prices or that such prices and productivity gains will fully offset any commodity price increases in the future, especially in light of the increased pricing pressures as discussed above.future. We generally have not engaged in hedging transactions with respect to raw material purchases, but do enter into fixed price supply contracts at times. Future decisions not to engage in hedging transactions or ineffective hedging transactions may result in increased price volatility, potentially adversely impacting our profitability.

Our dependency upon regular deliveries of supplies from particular suppliers means that interruptions or stoppages in such deliveries could adversely affect our operations until arrangements with alternate suppliers could be made. Several of the raw materials and sub-assemblies used in the manufacture of our products currently are procured only from a single source. If any of these sole-source suppliers were unable or unwilling to deliver these materials for an extended period of time we may not be able to manufacture one or more products for a period of time, and our business could suffer. We may not be able to find acceptable alternatives, and any such alternatives could result in increased costs. Difficulties in the credit markets could adversely affect our suppliers’ access to capital and therefore their ability to continue to provide an adequate supply of the materials we use in our products.

The majority of our products are manufactured at a single facility or location, and the loss of one or more of these facilities or locations could prevent us from manufacturing all the various products we sell.

We manufacture the majority of our products in only a single facility or location. If an event occurred that resulted in material damage to one or more of these manufacturing facilities or we lacked sufficient labor to fully operate the facility, we may be unable to transfer the manufacture of the relevant products to another facility or location in a cost-effective or timely manner, if at all. This potential inability to transfer production could occur for a number of reasons, including but not limited to a lack of necessary relevant manufacturing capability at another facility, or the regulatory requirements of the FDA or other governmental regulatory bodies. Such an event would materially negatively impact our financial condition, results of operationoperations and cash flows.

11

Our international sales and operations are subject to risks and uncertainties that vary by country which could have a material adverse effect on our business and/or results of operations.

International sales accounted for approximately 3436 percent of our net sales in fiscal 2012.2015. We anticipate that international sales will continue to represent a significant portion of our total sales in the future. In addition, we have multiple manufacturing facilities and third-party suppliers that are located outside of the U.S.  As a result, our international sales, as well as our sales in the U.S. of products produced or sourced internationally, are subject to risks and uncertainties that can vary by country, such as political instability, economic conditions, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, changes in tax laws, regulatory and reimbursement programs and policies, and the protection of intellectual property rights.  In addition, our collections of international receivables are subject to economic pressures and the actions of some governmental authorities to initiatewho have initiated various austerity measures to control healthcare and other governmental spending.

Unfavorable outcomes related to uncertain tax positions could result in significant tax liabilities.

We have recorded tax benefits related to various uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. While we believe our positions are appropriate, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), state or foreign tax authorities could disagree with our positions, resulting in a significant tax payment.

We are involved on an ongoing basis in claims, lawsuits and governmental proceedings relating to our operations, as well as product liability or other liability claims that could expose us to adverse judgments or could affect the sales of our products.

We are involved in the design, manufacture and sale of health care products, which face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims if our products are alleged to have caused injury or are found to be unsuitable for their intended use. Amongst other claims, we are, from time to time, a party to claims and lawsuits alleging that our products have caused injury or death or are otherwise unsuitable. It is possible that we will receive adverse judgments in such lawsuits, and any such adverse judgments could be material. Although we do carry insurance with respect to such matters, this insurance is subject to varying deductibles and self-insured retentions and may not be adequate to cover the full amount of any particular claim. In addition, any such claims could negatively impact the sales of products that are the subject of such claims or other products.

We may not be able to grow if we are unable to successfully acquire and integrate, or form business relationships with, other companies.

We expect to grow our business in the future through mergers, acquisitions and other similar business arrangements.  We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or business relationships, negotiate acceptable terms for such acquisitions or relationships or receive necessary financing on acceptable terms. Additionally, we may become responsible for liabilities associated with businesses that we acquire to the extent they are not covered by indemnification from the sellers or by insurance. Even if we are able to consummate acquisitions, such acquisitions could be dilutive to earnings, and we could overpay for such acquisitions.  In 2012, we completed the acquisitions of German-based Völker group and Aspen Surgical.  Additionally, we may not be fully successful in our integration efforts or fully realize expected benefits from the integration.  Our integration efforts may divert management and other resources from other important matters, and we could experience delays or unusual expenses in the integration process, including intangible asset impairments which could result in significant charges in our Statements of Consolidated Income.  Moreover, the margins for these companies may differ from our historical gross and operating margins resulting in a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may not be able to attract, retain and develop key personnel.

Our future performance depends in significant part upon the continued service of our executive officers and other key personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers or other key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Our success also depends on our continuing ability to attract, retain and develop highly qualified personnel, and as competition for such personnel is intense, there can be no assurance that we can do so in the future.

The combined company’s business may suffer if it does not retain its senior management.

After the Welch Allyn acquisition, the combined company’s future success requires it to continue to attract and retain competent personnel. In particular, the combined company’s future success will depend on its senior management. As a result of the merger, Hill-Rom’s and Welch Allyn’s current and prospective employees could experience uncertainty about their future roles and the integration process. The loss of services of members of the combined company’s senior management team could adversely affect its business until suitable replacements can be found. There may be a limited number of persons with the requisite skills to serve in these positions, and the combined company may be unable to locate or employ qualified personnel on acceptable terms.

A portion of our workforce is unionized, and we could face labor disruptions that would interfere with our operations.

Approximately 47 percent of our employees as part of our logistics and manufacturing operations in the U.S. work under collective bargaining agreements. We are also subject to various collective bargaining arrangements or national agreements outside the U.S. covering approximately 2018 percent of our employees. The collective bargaining agreement at our primary U.S. manufacturing facility will expire in January 2013 and negotiations for a new agreement are underway. Although we have not recently experienced any significant work stoppages as a result of labor disagreements, we cannot ensure that such a stoppage will not occur in the future. Our primary labor contract expires in January 2016. Inability to negotiate satisfactory new agreements or a labor disturbance at one of our principal facilities could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

12


We may be adversely affected by new regulations relating to conflict minerals.

In August 2012, the SEC adopted new disclosures and reporting requirements for companies whose products contain certain minerals and their derivatives, namely tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold, known as conflict minerals. As of May 2014, companies are required to report annually whether or not such minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and/or adjoining countries and in some cases to perform extensive due diligence on their supply chains for such minerals. The implementation of these new requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability and pricing of materials used in the manufacturing of our products. In addition, we will incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including cost related to determining the source of any of the relevant minerals used in our products. Since our supply chain is complex and multilayered, we may be unable to ascertain with sufficient certainty the origins for these minerals or make a determination that that these minerals are DRC conflict free despite our due diligence procedures, which in turn may harm our reputation. We may also face difficulties in satisfying customers who may require that our products be certified as DRC conflict free, which could harm our relationships with these customers and/or lead to a loss of revenue. These requirements also could have the effect of limiting the pool of suppliers from which we source these minerals, and we may be unable to obtain conflict-free minerals at prices similar to the past, which could increase our costs and adversely affect our manufacturing operations and our profitability.

We may not be successful in achieving expected operating efficiencies and sustaining or improving operating expense reductions, and may experience business disruptions and adverse tax consequences associated with restructuring, realignment and cost reduction activities.

Over the past few years we have initiated several restructuring, realignment and cost reduction initiatives. In the third quarter of 2015, we announced plans to close two facilities in a continuing effort to rationalize our global footprint. Also, in the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we initiated a restructuring program to improve our cost structure by reducing our European manufacturing capacity and streamlining our global operations by, among other things, executing a back office process transformation program in Europe. While we expect to realize efficiencies from these actions, these activities may not produce the full efficiency and cost reduction benefits we expect. Further, such benefits may be realized later than expected, and the ongoing costs of implementing these measures may be greater than anticipated. If these measures are not successful or sustainable, we may undertake additional realignment and cost reduction efforts, which could result in future charges. Moreover, our ability to achieve our other strategic goals and business plans may be adversely affected and we could experience business disruptions with customers and elsewhere if our restructuring and realignment efforts prove ineffective.

These actions, the resulting costs, and delays or lower than anticipated benefits will also impact our foreign tax positions and may require us to record tax reserves against certain deferred tax assets in our international business, similar to the provision we recognized during the second quarter of fiscal 2014 with respect to France.

We are increasingly dependent on consistent functioning of our information technology systems and if we are exposed to any intrusions or if we fail to maintain the integrity of our data, our business could be materially affected.

We are increasingly dependent on consistent functioning of our information technology systems for our infrastructure and products. Our information systems require an ongoing commitment of significant resources to maintain, protect, and enhance existing systems and develop new systems to keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology, evolving systems and regulatory standards, integration of acquisitions, and the increasing need to protect patient and customer information. In addition, third parties may attempt to hack into our products or systems and may obtain proprietary information. If we fail to maintain or protect our information systems and data integrity effectively, we could lose existing customers or suppliers, have difficulty attracting new customers or suppliers, have problems that adversely impact internal controls, have difficulty preventing, detecting, and controlling fraud, have disputes with customers and suppliers, have regulatory sanctions or penalties imposed, have increases in operating expenses, incur expenses or lose revenues as a result of a data privacy breach, or suffer other adverse consequences. Any significant breakdown, intrusion, interruption, corruption, or destruction of these systems, as well as any data breaches, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We expect to incur substantial expenses related to the integration of Welch Allyn.

13

We expect to incur substantial expenses in connection with the integration of Welch Allyn. There are a large number of processes, policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that must be integrated, including purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, billing, payroll, manufacturing, marketing and employee benefits. While we expect to incur integration and restructuring costs and other costs incurred to execute the transaction following completion of the merger in 2015 that are estimated to range between $35 million and $40 million, many of the expenses that will be incurred are, by their nature, difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that we expect to achieve from elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings. Although we expect that the realization of efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses will offset incremental transaction, merger-related and restructuring costs over time, we cannot give any assurance that this net benefit will be achieved in the near term, or at all.

Successful integration of Welch Allyn with Hill-Rom and successful operation of the combined company are not assured. Also, integrating Hill-Rom’s business with that of Welch Allyn may divert the attention of management away from operations.

Welch Allyn is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hill-Rom but will, at least initially, continue its operations on a basis that is largely separate from Hill-Rom’s previously existing operations. There can be no assurance that Welch Allyn will be able to maintain and grow its business and operations. In addition, the market segments in which Welch Allyn operates may experience declines in demand and/or new competitors. Integrating and coordinating certain aspects of the operations and personnel of Welch Allyn with Hill-Rom will involve complex operational, technological and personnel-related challenges. This process will be time-consuming and expensive, may disrupt the businesses of either or both of the companies and may not result in the full benefits expected from the merger, including cost synergies expected to arise from supply chain efficiencies and overlapping general and administrative functions. The potential difficulties, and resulting costs and delays, include:
·managing a larger combined company;
·consolidating corporate and administrative infrastructures;
·issues in integrating manufacturing, warehouse and distribution facilities, research and development and sales forces;
·difficulties attracting and retaining key personnel;
·loss of customers and suppliers and inability to attract new customers and suppliers;
·unanticipated issues in integrating information technology, communications and other systems;
·incompatibility of purchasing, logistics, marketing, administration and other systems and processes; and
·unforeseen and unexpected liabilities related to the merger or Welch Allyn’s business.

Additionally, the integration of Welch Allyn’s operations, products and personnel may place a significant burden on management and other internal resources. The diversion of management’s attention, and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process, could harm the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results.

We have incurred substantial additional indebtedness in connection with the Welch Allyn acquisition, and may not be able to meet all of our debt obligations.

As stated in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we have entered into several new credit facilities which have resulted in a substantially higher level of leverage compared with prior periods. Based on assumed interest rates, leverage ratios and credit ratings, we expect our debt service obligations, comprised of principal and interest (excluding capital leases), during the 12 months following the completion of the merger to be approximately $150 million. As a result of this increase in debt, demands on our cash resources have increased. The increased level of debt could, among other things:
·require us to dedicate a large portion of its cash flow from operations to the servicing and repayment of its debt, thereby reducing funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, research and development expenditures and other general corporate requirements;
·limit our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, research and development expenditures and other general corporate requirements;
·limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the industry in which we operate;
·restrict our ability to make strategic acquisitions or dispositions or to exploit business opportunities;
·place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt;
·adversely affect our credit rating, with the result that the cost of servicing our indebtedness might increase;
·adversely affect the market price of Hill-Rom common stock; and
·limit our ability to apply proceeds from an offering or asset sale to purposes other than the servicing and repayment of debt.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVEDUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

We have not received any comments from the staff of the SEC regarding our periodic or current reports that remain unresolved.

 

The principal properties used in our operations are listed below, and, except for our leased facilities in Acton, Massachusetts; Caledonia, Michigan; Cary, North Carolina; Chicago, Illinois, St. Paul, Minnesota; Singapore; and Redditch, UK, are owned by us subject to no material encumbrances.below. All facilities are suitable for their intended purpose, are being efficiently utilized and are believed to provide adequate capacity to meet demand for the next several years.

Location
Description and Primary Use
Owned/Leased
Acton, MA
Light manufacturing, development and distribution of health care equipmentequipment;
Office administration
Leased
Batesville, IN
Manufacturing, development and distribution of health care equipmentequipment;
Office administration
Owned
Beaverton, OR
Development of heath care equipment;
Office administration
Leased
Caledonia, MI
Manufacturing, development and distribution of surgical productsproducts;
Office administration
Leased
Cary, NC
Development of health care equipment
Office administration
Charleston, SC
Development and distribution of medical devices
Office administration
Chicago,Carol Stream, ILOffice administration
St. Paul, MNOffice administration
Montpellier, FranceManufacturing and development of medical devices
Pluvigner, France
Manufacturing, development and distribution of health care equipmentequipment;
Office administration
Leased
Hainichen, GermanyCary, NC
Development of health care equipment;
Office administration
ManufacturingLeased
Charleston, SC
Light manufacturing and distribution of health care equipmentequipment;
Office administration
Owned/Leased
Chicago, ILOffice administrationLeased
Witten, GermanySt. Paul, MNOffice administrationLeased
Skaneateles Falls, NY
Manufacturing, development and distribution of health care equipmentequipment;
Office administration
Owned
Monterrey, MexicoJiangsu, ChinaManufacturing of health care equipmentLeased
Taicang, ChinaLight manufacturing and distribution of health care equipmentLeased
Montpellier, FranceManufacturing and development of health care equipmentOwned
Pluvigner, France
Manufacturing, development and distribution of health care equipment;
Office administration
Owned
Hainichen, Germany*Manufacturing and distribution of health care equipmentOwned
Puchheim, GermanyManufacturing and distribution of health care equipmentOwned
Saalfeld, Germany
Manufacturing, development and distribution of health care equipment;
Office administration
Owned
Witten, Germany
Manufacturing, development and distribution of health care equipment;
Office administration
Owned
Navan, County Meath, IrelandOffice administrationOwned
Kawagawa, JapanOffice administrationLeased
Tijuana, Mexico
Manufacturing and distribution of health care equipment;
Office administration
Leased
Monterrey, MexicoManufacturing of health care equipmentOwned
Las Piedras, Puerto RicoManufacturing of surgical products
Owned
Singapore
Manufacturing and development of health care equipmentequipment;
Office administration
Leased
Lulea, Sweden
Manufacturing, development and distribution of safe mobility and handling solutionshealth care equipment;
Office administration
Owned
Redditch, UKUK*
Manufacturing and distribution of surgical productsproducts;
Office administration
Leased

* denotes properties where plans are in process to close, consolidate, or repurpose the facility

In addition to the foregoing, we lease or own a number of other facilities, warehouse distribution centers, service centers and sales offices throughout the U.S., Canada, Western Europe, Mexico, Australia, Middle East, and the Far East.East, and Latin America.

15

Item 3. LEGALLEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding legal proceedings in which we are involved.

Item 4. MINEMINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.
 
 










(1)Shares purchased during the quarter ended September 30, 20122015 were in connection with the share repurchase program discussed below as well as employee payroll tax withholding for restricted and deferred stock distributions.

(2)In September 2013, the Board approved an expansion of its previously announced share repurchase authorization to a total of $190.0 million. As of September 30, 2012 the total number of shares available for repurchase was 28.7 million shares of which2015, a cumulative total of 28.2$125.3 million shares havehas been repurchasedused under this existing authorization. The plan does not have an expiration date and currently there are no plans to terminate this program in the future.  In October 2012, the Board approved an expansion of its previously announced share repurchase authorization by 3.5 million shares, bringing the total number of shares available for repurchase to 32.2 million shares.
 
Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the return on our common stock (as Hillenbrand Industries, Inc. through March 31, 2008) with that of Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (“S&P 500 Index”), and our Peer Group* for the five years ended September 30, 2012.2015. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and our peer groupPeer Group was $100 on October 1, 20072010 and that all dividends were reinvested.  The spin-off of our funeral services business at March 31, 2008 was treated as a reinvestment of a special dividend effective April 1, 2008 pursuant to SEC rules.  The special dividend was based on the value of one share of Hillenbrand, Inc. (the holding company for the funeral services business) which was distributed as part of the spin-off.



 201020112012201320142015
HRC$100$   83$  82$103$121$153
S & P 500$100$   99$126$147$172$168
Peer Group$100$104$135$141$166$196
  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012 
HRC (HB through March 31, 2008) $100  $105  $78  $130  $110  $108 
S & P 500  100   75   68   74   73   93 
Peer Group  100   90   85   100   100   127 
  April 1, 2008  September 30, 2008  September 30, 2009  September 30, 2010  September 30, 2011  September 30, 2012 
HRC $100  $115  $85  $142  $120  $118 
S & P 500  100   85   77   83   83   105 
Peer Group  100   91   85   100   100   128 

*For purposes of the Stock Performance GraphsGraph above, our Peer Group is comprised of: Alere Inc.; C.R.CR Bard Inc.; CareFusion Corp.; Chemed Corp.; ConmedCONMED Corporation; DentsplyDENTSPLY International Inc.; Edwards Lifesciences Corporation;Corp.; Hologic Inc.; Hospira, Inc.; IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.; Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corporation; Intuitive Surgical, Inc.; Invacare Corporation; Mednax, Inc.; Mettler-Toledo InternationalMEDNAX, Inc.; PerkinElmer Inc.; ResMed Inc.; Sirona Dental Systems Labs Inc.; Steris Corporation;Corp.; Teleflex Inc.Incorporated.; The Cooper Companies Inc.; Varian Medical Systems, Inc;Inc.; and West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.; and Zimmer Holdings, Inc.

Certain other information required by this item will be contained under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 8, 2013,15, 2016, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.



The following table presents our selected consolidated financial data for each of the last five fiscal years ended September 30. StatementRefer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Income data reflects our consolidated results on a continuing operations basis with the resultsFinancial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of our former funeral servicesthis Form 10-K for disclosure of business reflected as discontinued operations in fiscal 2008. Balance sheet and cash flow data,combinations for periods prior to consummationeach of the spin-off of the funeral services business at the end of the secondlast three fiscal quarter of 2008, have not been adjusted.years. Also see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for selected unaudited quarterly financial information for each of the last two fiscal years.

  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011 
                
Net revenue $1,988.2  $1,686.1  $1,716.2  $1,634.3  $1,591.7 
Net income $46.8  $60.6  $105.0  $120.8  $133.5 
Net income attributable to common shareholders $47.7  $60.6  $105.0  $120.8  $133.3 
Net income attributable to common shareholders per share - Basic $0.83  $1.05  $1.75  $1.94  $2.11 
Net income attributable to common shareholders per share - Diluted $0.82  $1.04  $1.74  $1.94  $2.09 
Total assets $4,457.6  $1,751.3  $1,586.8  $1,627.6  $1,299.1 
Long-term obligations $2,175.2  $364.1  $225.8  $237.5  $50.8 
Cash flows from operating activities $213.8  $210.3  $263.2  $261.7  $222.5 
Capital expenditures $121.3  $62.7  $65.3  $77.8  $68.9 
Cash flows from investing activities $(1,756.4) $(294.5) $(58.6) $(539.5) $(78.0)
Cash flows from financing activities $1,642.7  $63.8  $(161.5) $135.6  $(101.9)
Cash dividends per share $0.6325  $0.5950  $0.5250  $0.4875  $0.4300 
(In millions except per share data) 2012  2011  2010  2009  2008 
                
Net revenues $1,634.3  $1,591.7  $1,469.6  $1,386.9  $1,507.7 
Income (loss) from continuing operations $120.8  $133.5  $126.0  $(405.0) $67.1 
Income from discontinued operations $-  $-  $-  $-  $48.7 
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders $120.8  $133.3  $125.3  $(405.0) $115.8 
Income (loss) attributable to common shareholders per share                    
 from continuing operations - Diluted $1.94  $2.09  $1.97  $(6.47) $1.07 
Income per share from discontinued operations - Diluted $-  $-  $-  $-  $0.78 
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders per share - Diluted $1.94  $2.09  $1.97  $(6.47) $1.85 
Total assets $1,627.6  $1,299.1  $1,245.6  $1,232.6  $1,689.9 
Long-term obligations $237.5  $50.8  $98.5  $99.7  $100.3 
Cash flows from operating activities $261.7  $222.5  $139.8  $225.7  $270.5 
Capital expenditures $77.8  $68.9  $64.7  $63.9  $102.6 
Cash dividends per share $0.49  $0.43  $0.41  $0.41  $0.78 






Industry-wide Demand and Cost Pressures. We believe that over the long term, overall patient and provider demand for health care products and services will continue to grow as a result of a number of factors, including an aging population, longer life expectancies, greater access to medical insurance through government regulation and an increasing number of sicker patients across all care settings, including hospitals, extended care facilities and in the home. In contrast, however, health care providers across the care continuum are under continued pressure to improve efficiency and control costs, possibly reducing demand for our products and services. These pressures may occur for a number of reasons, including declining commercial third-party payorpayer reimbursement rates, government regulation, and government regulation.hospital consolidation. In addition, an increasing number of our customers are purchasing through GPO agreements or other large contracts, where they may be able to purchase at lower prices than they would be able to individually. Moreover, general economic pressures have caused some governmental authorities to initiate various austerity measures to control healthcare spending, reducing direct spending in addition to governmental reimbursement rates. TheseWe believe these factors may decrease demand for our products, decrease payments to us, or both.  Althoughboth; however, we believe that industrymay be able to offset some or all of this decreased demand will increase over time, a lack of demand growth could impactthrough effective research and development leading to new product introductions, as well as providing demonstrable clinical and economic value to our ability to grow revenues.customers.

Growing DesireCustomer Consolidation. Economic considerations, competition and other factors have led to on-going consolidation of customers and the centralization of purchasing decision making. We believe this has influenced the criteria customers use to evaluate the value proposition offered by Hill-Rom for various product and service offerings. Economic decision-makers partner with clinical decision-makers to determine product selection. This has caused Hill-Rom to adjust the way we go to market and the structure of our sales and distribution channels, particularly in North America. Among Developed and Developing Countriesother measures, Hill-Rom established Strategic Partnership Teams as an adjunct to Invest in Health Care.  While industry growth rates in more mature geographic markets such as western and northern Europe and Japan have moderated, in many other geographic markets, where the relative spending on health care is increasing, we are experiencing increasing demandour traditional sales representatives to better address customer needs for medical technologies. New hospital construction and hospital refurbishments have continued in regions such as Latin America, the Middle East and many parts of Asia.  These trends could increase overall demand for our products and services.services that deliver solutions for more cost-effective patient care. With the acquisition of Welch Allyn, we also added a significant distributor component serving primary care. The extent to which Hill-Rom effectively addresses evolving needs brought about by customer consolidation could significantly impact the success of our revenue and profitability.





Patient and Caregiver Safety, Quality, and QualityEconomic Outcomes. AnWe believe an increasing emphasis is being placed within hospitals to assure quality of care through increased accountability and public disclosure. At the same time, we believe caregiver shortages, worker related injuries, the aging workforce, and other staffing requirements have led to increasing emphasis on caregiver injury prevention. Several pieces of legislation have been enacted over the past few years to address these areas including the "pay for performance" initiative by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") which aims to better align reimbursement with improved patient outcomes and the reduction of adverse events including bedsores (or pressure ulcers), ventilator associated pneumonia, patient falls, deep vein thrombosis and patient entrapment. Hospitals may experience reduced reimbursement for hospital acquired adverse events, making a stronger connection with these adverse events and revenue levels. Therefore, we believe that healthcare providers will seek to do business with partners that can demonstrate improved clinical, and consequently, economic, outcomes. A number of the top adverse events and preventable medical errors in U.S. hospitals, including those listed above, can be mitigated in part by our technologies, processes and services. We believe we are well positioned to benefit from the emphasis being placed on patient safety due to our products and technologies that are designed to assist providers in materially improving outcomes associated with patients confined to beds across all care settings.

Related to caregiver safety, certain countries in Europe have established legislation that has mandated that patient lifts be available in hospitals.  In the U.S., several states have enacted or introduced legislationsettings, and most recently, The Nurse and Health Care Worker Protection Act of 2009 was introduced in Congress aimed at eliminating manual patient lifts and transfers.  Wewe believe that an effective program of new product innovation focusing on these trends will ultimately benefit our products and services seek to address these concerns through novel application of technology, clinical and ergonomic science, and customer feedback.revenue growth. Overall increasing emphasis on patient and caregiver safety and quality could increase demand for our products and services.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The accompanying consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). We provide non-GAAP measures, including adjusted income before income taxes, income tax expense and diluted earnings per share results, because we use these measures internally for planning, forecasting, and evaluating the performance of the business.

In addition, we analyze net revenuesrevenue on a constant currency basis to better measure the comparability of results between periods. We believe that evaluating growth in net revenuesrevenue on a constant currency basis provides an additional and meaningful assessment to both management and investors.

We believe use these measures internally for planning, forecasting, and evaluating the performance of these non-GAAP measures contribute to an understanding of our financial performance and provide an additional analytical tool to understand our results from core operations and to reveal underlying trends.the business. These measures should not, however, be considered in isolation, as a substitute for, or as superior to measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
 
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table presents comparative operating results for the years discussed within Management’s Discussion and Analysis:

  Years Ended September 30 
     % of Related     % of Related     % of Related 
(Dollars in millions except per share data) 2015  Revenue  2014  Revenue  2013  Revenue 
Net Revenue                  
Capital sales $1,604.5   80.7% $1,301.4   77.2% $1,308.3   76.2%
Rental revenue  383.7   19.3%  384.7   22.8%  407.9   23.8%
Total Revenue  1,988.2   100.0%  1,686.1   100.0%  1,716.2   100.0%
Gross Profit                        
Capital sales  683.3   42.6%  571.2   43.9%  560.5   42.8%
Rental revenue  197.0   51.3%  208.7   54.3%  219.8   53.9%
Total Gross Profit  880.3   44.3%  779.9   46.3%  780.3   45.5%
Research and development expenses  91.8   4.6%  71.9   4.3%  70.2   4.1%
Selling and administrative expenses  664.2   33.4%  548.3   32.5%  549.5   32.0%
Special charges  41.2   2.1%  37.1   2.2%  5.7   0.3%
Operating Profit  83.1   4.2%  122.6   7.3%  154.9   9.0%
Other income (expense), net  (18.0)  -0.9%  (7.4)  -0.4%  (10.9)  -0.6%
Income Before Income Taxes  65.1   3.3%  115.2   6.8%  144.0   8.4%
Income tax expense  18.3   0.9%  54.6   3.2%  39.0   2.3%
Net Income  46.8   2.4%  60.6   3.6%  105.0   6.1%
Less:  Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  (0.9)  -   -   -   -   - 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $47.7   2.4% $60.6   3.6% $105.0   6.1%
                         
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders                        
per Common Share - Diluted $0.82      $1.04      $1.74     
Note: Certain percentage amounts may not add due to rounding.
  Years Ended September 30 
     % of Related     % of Related     % of Related 
(In millions except per share data) 2012  Revenues  2011  Revenues  2010  Revenues 
Net Revenues                  
Capital sales $1,198.2   73.3% $1,119.0   70.3% $996.6   67.8%
Rental revenues  436.1   26.7%  472.7   29.7%  473.0   32.2%
Total Revenues  1,634.3   100.0%  1,591.7   100.0%  1,469.6   100.0%
Gross Profit                        
Capital sales  507.8   42.4%  512.2   45.8%  448.0   45.0%
Rental revenues  246.9   56.6%  269.1   56.9%  268.6   56.8%
Total Gross Profit  754.7   46.2%  781.3   49.1%  716.6   48.8%
Research and development expenses  66.9   4.1%  63.8   4.0%  58.3   4.0%
Selling and administrative expenses  496.4   30.4%  502.0   31.5%  474.6   32.3%
Litigation (credit) charge  (3.6)  -0.2%  47.3   3.0%  (21.2)  -1.4%
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  8.0   0.5%  -   -   -   - 
Special charges  18.2   1.1%  1.4   0.1%  13.2   0.9%
Operating Profit  168.8   10.3%  166.8   10.5%  191.7   13.0%
Other income (expense), net  (5.3)  -0.3%  (7.1)  -0.4%  (8.8)  -0.6%
Income Before Income Taxes  163.5   10.0%  159.7   10.0%  182.9   12.4%
Income tax expense  42.7   2.6%  26.2   1.6%  56.9   3.9%
Net Income  120.8   7.4%  133.5   8.4%  126.0   8.6%
Less:  Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  -   -   0.2   -   0.7   - 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $120.8   7.4% $133.3   8.4% $125.3   8.5%
                         
Net Income Attributable  to Common Shareholders                        
per Common Share - Diluted $1.94      $2.09      $1.97     
                         
                         
Note: Certain percentage amounts may not add due to rounding.                     

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 20122015 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 20112014

Consolidated Results of Operations

In this section, we provide a high-level overview of our consolidated results of operations. Immediately following this section is a discussion of our results of operations by reportable segment. We disclose segment information that is consistent with the way in which management operates and views the business.

Net RevenuesOur performance under each reportable segment is measured on a divisional income basis before non-allocated operating and administrative costs, acquisition-related intangible asset amortization, impairments, litigation, special charges, acquisition and integration costs, and other unusual events. Divisional income generally represents the division’s gross profit less its direct operating costs along with an allocation of manufacturing and distribution costs, research and development, and certain corporate functional expenses.

  Years Ended September 30  Percentage Change 
           Constant 
 (Dollars in millions) 2012  2011  As Reported  Currency 
Revenues:            
Capital sales $1,198.2  $1,119.0   7.1   8.9 
Rental revenues  436.1   472.7   (7.7)  (7.0)
Total Revenues $1,634.3  $1,591.7   2.7   4.2 
Capital sales increased, primarilyNon-allocated operating and administrative costs include functional expenses that support the entire organization such as a resultadministration, finance, legal, and human resources, expenses associated with strategic developments, acquisition-related intangible asset amortization, and other events that are not indicative of incremental sales dueoperating trends. We exclude such amounts from divisional income to our Völkerallow management to evaluate and Aspen Surgical acquisitions.  Sales in our International segment also increased due to strong growth inunderstand divisional operating trends without the Middle East and Eastern European regions, partially offset by lower Western European revenues.  North America capital sales declined for the year, where patient support system sales decreased 9.7 percent on lower volumes and hospital spending pressure.effects of such items.

Rental revenues declined in all segments on lower volumes and unfavorable pricing in select areas.  In our North America segment, revenues were down in all lines of business, with the largest percentage decline coming in our home care business where certain restructuring actions were taken in the current year.  Rental revenues in Surgical and Respiratory Care decreased on lower volumes and pricing pressures in our respiratory care business.  International rental revenues were also down, primarily on unfavorable currency effects.

Net Revenue

  Years Ended September 30  Percentage Change 
           Constant 
 (Dollars in millions) 2015  2014  As Reported  Currency 
Revenue:            
Capital sales $1,604.5  $1,301.4   23.3   29.9 
Rental revenue  383.7   384.7   (0.3)  1.7 
Total Revenue $1,988.2  $1,686.1   17.9   23.5 

Capital sales increased, due primarily to the impact of the Trumpf and Welch Allyn acquisitions which added over $225 million in sales. Higher patient support systems and clinical workflow solutions sales in our North America segment and organic sales increases in our Surgical and Respiratory Care segment also contributed to the increase, partially offset by lower sales in our International segment. Order trends in our North America segment show significant growth compared to prior periods, while orders in our International segment continue to be volatile due to a higher dependency on large tenders and the effects of significant economic uncertainty in Europe and the Middle East. Excluding the impact of the Trumpf and Welch Allyn acquisitions, sales increased 4.5 percent on a reported basis and 8.9 percent on a constant currency basis.

Rental revenue decreased slightly from the prior year as lower revenue in the International segment was offset by increases in the North America and Surgical and Respiratory Care segments. The North America increase was driven by improving volumes in the last half of the year due to recent contract wins, which more than offset the decline from the discontinuance of third-party payer therapy product rentals. International rental revenue was down sharply on a reported basis as a result of foreign currency fluctuations, and down on a constant currency basis by 4.3 percent.

Gross Profit

  Years Ended September 30 
        Percentage 
(Dollars in millions) 2015  2014  Change 
Gross Profit         
Capital sales $683.3  $571.2   19.6 
Percent of Related Revenue  42.6%  43.9%    
             
Rental revenue $197.0  $208.7   (5.6)
Percent of Related Revenue  51.3%  54.3%    
             
Total Gross Profit $880.3  $779.9   12.9 
Percent of Related Revenue  44.3%  46.3%    
  Years Ended September 30 
        Percentage 
(Dollars in millions) 2012  2011  Change 
Gross Profit         
Capital sales $507.8  $512.2   (0.9)
Percent of Related Revenues  42.4%  45.8%    
             
Rental revenues $246.9  $269.1   (8.2)
Percent of Related Revenues  56.6%  56.9%    
             
Total Gross Profit $754.7  $781.3   (3.4)
Percent of Related Revenues  46.2%  49.1%    

Capital gross profit was down only slightlyincreased by $112.1 million on higher revenues,revenue while gross margin (as a percentage of revenues) decreased 340130 basis points. The decline was due to a numbergross margin decrease is primarily driven by the impact of factors, most notably an unfavorabledilutive Trumpf margins, incremental field corrective action charges of $16.0$6.2 million, unfavorable geographic and product mix, higher commodity and fuel pricing, unfavorable acquisition coststhe prior year recognition of a $2.8 million benefit from a change in our employee benefits program. Margins were also negatively impacted by the inventory step-up associated with purchase accounting for acquisitions, which was $16.2 million in 2015, compared with $6.0 million in 2014. Excluding the step-upaforementioned items, organic capital margins increased 60 basis points as the impacts of acquired inventories and generally lower margins associated with Völker products.pricing pressure were more than offset by portfolio mix.

Rental gross profit decreased 8.2 percent$11.7 million and gross margin declined 30decreased 300 basis points,points. The margin decrease is partially due to lower revenuesthe prior year recognition of a $2.8 million benefit from the employee benefit program change referenced earlier, in addition to continued pricing pressure and the resulting reduced leverage of our fleet andhigher field service infrastructure as revenues declined quicker than our costs.  Partially offsetting this decline wascosts and depreciation on the recognized gain of $6.5 million relatedincremental capital expenditures necessary to a completed vendor product recall matter, which exceeded the gain of $2.3 million for the same product recallserve recent contract wins in the prior year.North America.

23


Other

  Years Ended September 30 
        Percentage 
(Dollars in millions) 2015  2014  Change 
          
Research and development expenses $91.8  $71.9   27.7 
Percent of Total Revenue  4.6%  4.3%    
             
Selling and administrative expenses $664.2  $548.3   21.1 
Percent of Total Revenue  33.4%  32.5%    
             
Special charges $41.2  $37.1   11.1 
             
Interest expense $(18.4) $(9.8)  87.8 
Investment income and other, net $0.4  $2.4   (83.3)
  Years Ended September 30 
        Percentage 
(Dollars in millions) 2012  2011  Change 
          
Research and development expenses $66.9  $63.8   4.9 
Percent of Total Revenues  4.1%  4.0%    
             
Selling and administrative expenses $496.4  $502.0   (1.1)
Percent of Total Revenues  30.4%  31.5%    
             
Litigation (credit) charge $(3.6) $47.3   n/a 
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles $8.0  $-   n/a 
Special charges $18.2  $1.4   n/a 
             
Interest expense $(6.5) $(8.5)  (23.5)
Investment income and other, net $1.2  $1.4   (14.3)

Research and development expenses increased 4.927.7 percent primarily due to the addition of Trumpf and Welch Allyn spending, accompanied by additional investment in organic product development initiatives, as we continue to increase our organic investments in new products.  well as the prior year benefit of $1.2 million associated with the aforementioned employee benefit program change.

Selling and administrative expenses declinedas a percent of total revenue increased 90 basis points. Selling and administrative expenses include acquisition and integration costs, acquisition-related intangible asset amortization, FDA remediation expenses, a supplemental stock compensation charge, and litigation settlements and expenses that totaled $90.0 million in 2015, compared with $43.6 in the prior year. Excluding these items, as well as the favorable impact of the employee benefit program change of $6.6 million recorded in 2014, selling and administrative expenses decreased 140 basis points as a percentage of revenues by 110 basis points as the incremental expenses addedrevenue. The improvements were due to operating leverage associated with recent acquisitionshigher revenue and the associated acquisition and integration costs were more than offset by lower personnel costs, including lower incentive compensation costs, and lower legal costs.ongoing cost control initiatives.

DuringWelch Allyn Integration
In conjunction with the fourth quarteracquisition of 2012,Welch Allyn in September 2015, we reachedeliminated approximately 80 positions, primarily in Welch Allyn’s corporate support and administrative functions, which became redundant as a favorable litigation settlementresult of $3.6merging into Hill-Rom. We recorded $14.4 million net of legal fees, related to a patent litigation suit.  During fiscal 2011, we recorded a litigation charge of $42.3 millionspecial charges in conjunction with reaching an agreementthis action in fiscal 2015 for severance and employee benefits provided to settleaffected employees. Many of the affected employees must continue service for a United States Officespecified period of Inspector General’s (“OIG”) investigation.  Also duringtime after completion of the merger in order to receive the severance benefits offered. As a result, additional charges related to this action of approximately $3 million will be recorded in fiscal 2011,2016 until those service obligations are fulfilled. Cash payments related to this action will continue throughout fiscal 2016.

Pension Settlement Charge
As disclosed in Note 6, we reachedoffered lump sum settlements to all terminated vested participants in our domestic master defined benefit retirement plan, which resulted in a settlement with Freedom Medical, Inc. with respect to an antitrust matter resulting in a litigation charge of $5.0$9.6 million. This charge was recorded as a component of special charges in fiscal 2015.

Site Consolidation
In the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we initiated a plan to streamline our operations and simplify our supply chain by consolidating certain manufacturing and distribution operations. As part of this action, we announced the closure of sites in Redditch, England and Charleston, South Carolina. Upon closure, each site’s operations will either be relocated to other existing Company facilities or outsourced to third-party suppliers. For the year ended September 30, 2015, we recorded severance and benefit charges of $2.7 million for approximately 160 employees to be displaced by the closures, as well as $1.8 million of other related costs. We expect to incur approximately $3 million of additional charges in the first half of fiscal 2016 for personnel costs and site closure expenses related to this action until the closures are complete. Cash payments related to these actions will continue throughout fiscal 2016.

 
Global Restructuring Program
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012,2014, we recordedannounced a non-cash impairment chargeglobal restructuring program focused on improving our cost structure. This action included early retirement and reduction in force programs that eliminated over 200 net positions, primarily in the U.S., where the action was substantially completed in fiscal 2014 with cash expenditures continuing during fiscal 2015. The program also included a reduction of $8.0our European manufacturing capacity and a streamlining of global operations by, among other things, executing a back office process transformation program in Europe. The restructuring in Europe is in process and has resulted in severance and benefit charges of $6.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, as well as other costs of $7.2 million related to legal and professional fees, temporary labor, project management, and other administrative functions. In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we also reversed $0.5 million of previously recorded severance and benefit charges due to certain plan participants declining continuing healthcare coverage.

Since the inception of the global restructuring program through September 30, 2015, we have recognized aggregate special charges of $37.6 million, which are recorded in both fiscal 2014 and 2015. Charges of $24.9 million were recorded in the year ended September 30, 2014, net of reversals. We expect to incur $5 to $10 million of additional European restructuring costs through the completion of the program.

Discontinuance of Third-Party Payer Rentals
Also during the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we initiated a previously acquired trade name whose assessmentplan to discontinue third-party payer rentals of therapy products occurring primarily in home care settings. Special charges recorded for this action included a $7.7 million non-cash tangible asset impairment charge, a $2.0 million charge for severance and other benefits for approximately 70 eliminated positions, and $1.6 million in other related costs, net of a reversal of $0.2 million which was triggered by strategic changesrecorded in how the asset would be utilized on a go forward basis.  Also at that time,third quarter of fiscal 2014. This action is substantially complete.

Batesville Manufacturing Early Retirement Program
During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, we announcedinitiated a plan to improve our cost structure and streamline our organization by amongoffering an early retirement program to certain manufacturing employees in our Batesville, Indiana plant, meeting specific eligibility requirements, and other things, eliminatingminor reduction in force actions. These programs resulted in the elimination of approximately 20035 positions across the Company resulting inand required recognition of a special charge of $9.3approximately $1 million net of reversals, primarily related tofor lump sum payments under the program and severance and other benefits provided to the effectedother affected employees. We also recorded an impairment of certain tangible assets for which the carrying values could not be fully recovered as a result of various strategic decisions, which resulted in a non-cash charge of $3.2 million.  These actions and the related cash expenditures wereThis action was substantially complete by the end of fiscal year 2012, but some will be paid in fiscal 2013.  The actions are anticipated to yield annualized cost savings of approximately $18 million after full implementation.
During the fourthsecond quarter of fiscal 2012, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $4.7 million for certain tangible assets for which the carrying values could not be fully recovered as a result of strategic decisions made relative to the exiting of underperforming portions of our home care business.  Also associated with this action was the elimination of approximately 100 positions and the related charge of $1.0 million, primarily related to severance and other benefits to be provided to the effected employees.  These actions and the related cash expenditures are expected to be completed by the end of fiscal year 2013.

During fiscal 2011, we recorded net special charges of $1.4 million primarily related to a combination of severance activities associated with our 2010 restructuring activities and additional write downs of assets held for sale related to our aviation assets.2014.

Interest expense was lower for the year on lower interest rates and borrowings for most of the year.  During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we repaid $47.5 million of unsecured debentures carrying an interest rate of 8.5 percent, lowering our outstanding borrowings.  Then during the fourth quarter in conjunctionhigher compared with the Aspen Surgical acquisition, we borrowed an additional $260 million at more favorable rates, however givenprior year due to incremental borrowings made in connection with the interim period in between with reduced borrowings, our total amount of interest expense was reduced for the year.Trumpf and Welch Allyn acquisitions.

GAAP and Adjusted Earnings

  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011 
                   
(Dollars in millions, except for per share amounts) Income Before
Income Taxes
  
Income Tax
 Expense
  Diluted EPS (1)  
Income Before
Income Taxes
and NCI (1) (2)
  
Income Tax
Expense (1)
  Diluted EPS 
                   
GAAP Earnings $163.5  $42.7  $1.94  $159.7  $26.2  $2.09 
Adjustments:                        
Vendor product recall  (6.5)  (2.5)  (0.06)  (2.3)  (0.9)  (0.02)
Acquisition and integration costs  11.7   2.9   0.14   1.0   0.4   0.01 
Special charges  18.2   6.8   0.18   1.4   0.5   0.01 
Impairment of other intangibles  8.0   2.1   0.09   -   -   - 
Field corrective action  16.0   5.9   0.16   -   -   - 
Litigation (credit) charge  (3.6)  (1.3)  (0.04)  47.3   14.2   0.52 
International tax reorganization and recognition of                        
unrecognized tax attributes  -   11.0   (0.18)  -   21.5   (0.34)
                         
Adjusted Earnings $207.3  $67.6  $2.24  $207.2  $61.8  $2.27 
                         
(1) May not add due to rounding.                        
(2) NCI refers to our noncontrolling interest in our former Encompass joint venture.                 
Income before income taxes, income tax expense, and earnings attributable to common shareholders per diluted share are summarized in the table below. GAAP amounts are adjusted for certain items to aid management in evaluating the performance of the business.
 
  Years Ended September 30 
  2015  2014 
(Dollars in millions, except for per share amounts) 
Income Before
Income Taxes
  
Income Tax
Expense
  NCI  Diluted EPS  
Income Before
Income Taxes
  
Income Tax
Expense
  
Diluted EPS1
 
                      
GAAP Earnings $65.1  $18.3  $(0.9) $0.82  $115.2  $54.6  $1.04 
Adjustments:                            
Acquisition and integration costs  62.8   18.0   -   0.76   16.3   5.0   0.19 
Acquisition-related intangible asset amortization  34.1   9.8   -   0.42   28.8   8.7   0.34 
Employee benefits change  -   -   -   -   (13.4)  (5.1)  (0.14)
FDA remediation expenses  3.8   1.2   -   0.04   4.5   1.7   0.05 
Field corrective actions  4.5   1.4   -   0.05   (1.7)  (0.6)  (0.02)
Litigation settlements and expenses  (0.6)  (0.2)  -   (0.01)  -   -   - 
Special charges  41.2   10.7   -   0.52   37.1   10.9   0.45 
Supplemental stock compensation charge  6.1   2.2   -   0.07   -   -   - 
Foreign valuation allowance and acquisition dividend tax  -   1.9   -   (0.03)  -   (20.3)  0.35 
                             
Adjusted Earnings $217.0  $63.3  $(0.9) $2.64  $186.8  $54.9  $2.25 
1 Total does not add due to rounding
NCI = Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

The effective tax rate for fiscal 20122015 was 26.128.1 percent compared to 16.447.4 percent in the prior year. The effective rates for both fiscal 2012 and 2011 were favorably impacted by the recognition of discrete period tax benefits.  The effective tax rate for 2012 was favorably impacted byfiscal 2015 is lower than fiscal 2014 due primarily to the $11.0$19.6 million of tax expense recognized in the prior year to establish a valuation allowance on the net deferred tax assets in France, primarily net operating losses. This compares to $3.3 million of tax benefits in the current year primarily related to the international tax reorganization efforts in the fourth quarter.  The lower rate in 2011 is due primarily to the fourth quarter recognition of $21.5 millionreversal of previously unrecognizedrecorded valuation allowances in Australia and the one-time catch-up tax benefits associated predominantly with international operating loss carryforwards, as well as higher earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions andbenefit from the reinstatement of the research and development tax credit.

 
On December 19, 2014, the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (the Tax Act) was signed into law. The Tax Act retroactively extended the research and development tax credit for one year beginning January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014. This credit had previously expired effective December 31, 2013. The reinstatement of the research and development tax credit favorably impacted the effective tax rate for fiscal 2015 by approximately $2 million through a combination of a one-time catch-up adjustment from the reinstatement of the credit recorded in our first quarter of fiscal 2015 and the inclusion of the limited current year research credit into the fiscal 2015 effective tax rate.

The adjusted effective tax rates were 32.629.2 and 29.829.4 percent for fiscal years 20122015 and 2011.  The lower rate in 2011 is due primarily to the benefit of higher earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions as well as the benefit and reinstatement of the research and development tax credit.  For fiscal 2011, we entered the year with no allowable credit, but its reinstatement in the first quarter allowed for a full year’s benefit in 2011 as well as required a retroactive “catch up” of previously unrecognized credits.  For fiscal 2012, the credit expired at the end of our first quarter.2014.

Net income attributable to common shareholders was $120.8$47.7 million in fiscal 2015 compared to $133.3$60.6 million in the prior year period.year. On an adjusted basis, net income attributable to common shareholders decreased $5.5increased $22.7 million, or 3.8 percent.17.2 percent compared with the prior year. Diluted earnings per share decreased from $2.09 in the prior year to $1.94 in the current year21.2 percent on a reported basis and increased 17.3 percent on an adjusted basis decreased $0.03 to $2.24 per diluted share.over the same period.

Business Segment Results of Operations

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we changed our segment reporting to reflect changes in our organizational structure and management’s view of the business.  As part of these changes, we combined the North America Acute Care and components of the North America Post-Acute Care segments into a new North America segment.  At the same time we created the Surgical and Respiratory Care segment which contains the surgical reporting unit (formerly part of the North America Acute Care segment), the respiratory care reporting unit (formerly part of the North America Post-Acute Care segment) and the recently acquired Aspen Surgical business.  There were no changes to the International segment.  The prior year segment information included below has been updated to reflect these changes.
  Years Ended September 30  Percentage Change 
           Constant 
(Dollars in millions) 2015  2014  As Reported  Currency 
Revenue:            
North America $1,002.0  $888.9   12.7   13.4 
Surgical and Respiratory Care  506.6   301.6   68.0   78.3 
International  429.4   495.6   (13.4)  (2.1)
Welch Allyn1
  50.2   -   N/M   N/M 
     Total revenue $1,988.2  $1,686.1   17.9   23.5 
                 
Divisional income:                
North America $204.1  $165.0   23.7     
Surgical and Respiratory Care  80.5   68.6   17.3     
International  12.8   24.9   (48.6)    

1 Welch Allyn is not considered a reportable segment but is presented as a reconciling item to total consolidated revenue.
  Years Ended September 30  Percentage Change 
           Constant 
(Dollars in millions) 2012  2011  As Reported  Currency 
Revenues:            
North America $998.2  $1,057.2   (5.6)  (5.5)
Surgical and Respiratory Care  153.2   132.9   15.3   15.3 
International  482.9   401.6   20.2   25.8 
     Total revenues $1,634.3  $1,591.7   2.7   4.2 
                 
Divisional income:                
North America $198.9  $230.6   (13.7)    
Surgical and Respiratory Care  38.1   40.0   (4.8)    
International  18.6   27.9   (33.3)    
Corporate expenses  (64.2)  (83.0)  (22.7)    
     Total divisional income $191.4  $215.5   (11.2)    
N/M = Not meaningful

North America

North America capitalrevenue increased 12.7 percent. Capital sales were down 4.5up 17.2 percent related primarilydue to volume declines in ourhigher sales of patient support systems sales, whichand clinical workflow solutions products. Rental revenue increased by 2.4 percent as improved volumes from recent contract wins were down 9.7 percent in a difficult North American healthcare environment with continued pressure on capital spending.  This decline was partially offset by stronger sales from our healthcare information technology business.  Rental revenues declined 7.9 percent, with declines in all care settings and in our twothe discontinuance of third-party payer therapy product groupings of therapy and movable medical equipment.  Volume declines in these product groupings are attributable to the lower indications of flu, continued initiatives by hospitals to control operating costs and competitive pressures.  The largest percentage decline in rental revenues came from our home care business where certain restructuring actions were takenrentals in the currentsecond half of fiscal 2014, along with continued pricing pressure. Excluding the effects of the discontinuance of third-party payer therapy product rentals, rental revenue increased 7.6 percent compared with the prior year.

North America divisional income decreasedincreased 23.7 percent due primarily to increased revenue and the lower operating income generatedresulting increase in response to the lower revenues, alonggross profit. Capital margins increased 60 basis points compared with the impact of a field corrective action of $16.0 million.  This decline was only partially offset by operating expense favorability.  Capital margins declined, impacted by the field corrective action, while rental margins remained flat despite the impact of declining revenues due to gains recognized in connection with a vendor product recall of $6.5 million in the currentprior year compared to $2.3 million for the same product recall in the prior year.  Operating expenses were favorable primarily due to lower personnel costs, including variable and incentive compensation.favorable changes in product mix. Rental margins declined as a result of continued pricing pressure, along with our increased investment in additional capacity to meet the higher volumes in fiscal 2015 from recent contract wins. Divisional income also benefited from improved leverage of operating expenses on higher revenue.


Surgical and Respiratory Care

Surgical and Respiratory Care capitalrevenue increased 68.0 percent on a reported basis, and 78.3 percent on a constant currency basis. Excluding the impact of the Trumpf acquisition, revenue increased 3.2 percent on a reported basis driven by higher respiratory and surgical sales. Capital sales increased 42.684.8 percent primarily due to Trumpf, while rental revenue in respiratory care was relatively flat year over year.

Surgical and Respiratory Care divisional income increased 17.3 percent due primarily to sales includedthe incremental gross profit from our fourth quarter acquisition of Aspen Surgical.  Excluding Aspen Surgical, capital revenues increased 4.5 percent.  Rental revenues decreased 7.4 percent asTrumpf, but at a result of lower rental volumes in our respiratory care product line as well as continued pricing pressures.

rate given the lower Trumpf margins. Divisional income for the segment decreased dueexcluding acquisitions was impacted by increased investments in research and development and sales channel to a decline in gross profit related to a generally lower margin on Aspen Surgical products compared to the other businesses in the segment, as well as the effects of acquisition and integration costs, including inventory step-up, associated with the purchase of Aspen Surgical.  Rental gross profit decreased and gross margin declined as revenues decreased quicker than our costs.support growth initiatives.

International

International revenue decreased 13.4 percent on a reported basis, and 2.1 percent on a constant currency basis. International capital sales increased 24.7decreased 12.9 percent, or 1.8 percent on a constant currency basis due primarily to weaker sales in Europe, the Middle East, and 30.2Latin America. Sales in this segment continue to face significant volatility as result of continued economic uncertainty in various regions around the world. International rental revenue decreased 16.8 percent on a reported basis and 4.3 percent on a constant currency basis due to sales included from our second quarter fiscal 2012 acquisition of Völker, as well as strong sales in the Middle Eastcontinued volume and Eastern European regions coming from large tender wins.  This favorability was partially offset by lower Western European revenues coming from a difficult business environment.  Rental revenues declined by 7.2 percent on a reported basis and 1.4 percent on a constant currency basis.  The rental decrease not related to currency effects was primarily the result of increasing pricepricing pressures.

International divisional income declined despitedecreased 48.6 percent due primarily to lower revenue and the stronger revenues.  Grossresulting decline in gross profit, increased on higher revenues while grosspartially offset by lower selling and administrative expenses, along with some unfavorable foreign currency impact. Capital margins declined related70 basis points from the prior year. Rental margins decreased due to generally lower margins associated with Völker products, lower margins on certain tender wins, unfavorable product mixreduced leverage of fleet and slightly higher commodity pricing,field service infrastructure as revenue has declined more quickly than our field service costs, along with higher fuel pricing.  Operating expenses also increased related primarily to costs introduced by our recent acquisitions, including Völker in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and the Liko Distributors in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.continued pricing pressure.

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 20112014 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 20102013

Consolidated Results of Operations

In this section, we provide a high-level overview of our consolidated results of operations. Immediately following this section is a discussion of our results of operations by reportable segment. We disclose segment information that is consistent with the way in which management operates and views the business.

Net RevenuesRevenue

  Years Ended September 30  Percentage Change 
           Constant 
 (Dollars in millions) 2014  2013  As Reported  Currency 
Revenue:            
Capital sales $1,301.4  $1,308.3   (0.5)  (1.1)
Rental revenue  384.7   407.9   (5.7)  (6.0)
Total Revenue $1,686.1  $1,716.2   (1.8)  (2.2)
  Years Ended September 30  Percentage Change 
           Constant 
 (Dollars in millions) 2011  2010  As Reported  Currency 
Revenues:            
Capital sales $1,119.0  $996.6   12.3   10.8 
Rental revenues  472.7   473.0   (0.1)  (0.6)
Total Revenues $1,591.7  $1,469.6   8.3   7.2 

Capital sales increased across all three segments, led by a 17.9 percent increasedecreased, due primarily to lower patient support system sales in our North America where patient support systemsand International segments, which were partially offset by sales increases within the Surgical and Respiratory Care segment. Surgical and Respiratory Care sales increased 28.1 percent on higherdue to strong organic growth and the acquisition of Trumpf in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. In both our North America and International segments, capital order trends continue to be volatile as our customers continue to closely watch their expenditures, looking for clarity in the evolving healthcare marketplace.

Rental revenue declined in the North America segment primarily due to lower volumes, continued pricing pressure, and improved hospital capital spending.  On a reported basis International capital sales were up, butour discontinuance of third-party payer therapy product rentals. Surgical and Respiratory Care rental revenue was flat for fiscal 2014, with international rental revenue also flat on a constant currency basis, sales were essentially flat as volume growth in Latin America was offset by declines in the Middle East, Asia-Pacific and Europe.

Rental revenues were consistent with the prior year.  Growth in respiratory care revenues and the effects of favorable foreign exchange rates were offset by volume declines in the first part of the year due to a weaker influenza season compared to 2010, which impacted both our therapy rental and moveable medical equipment businesses.basis.

Gross Profit

  Years Ended September 30 
        Percentage 
(Dollars in millions) 2014  2013  Change 
Gross Profit         
Capital sales $571.2  $560.5   1.9 
Percent of Related Revenue  43.9%  42.8%    
             
Rental revenue $208.7  $219.8   (5.1)
Percent of Related Revenue  54.3%  53.9%    
             
Total Gross Profit $779.9  $780.3   (0.1)
Percent of Related Revenue  46.3%  45.5%    
  Years Ended September 30 
        Percentage 
(Dollars in millions) 2011  2010  Change 
Gross Profit         
Capital sales $512.2  $448.0   14.3 
Percent of Related Revenues  45.8%  45.0%    
             
Rental revenues $269.1  $268.6   0.2 
Percent of Related Revenues  56.9%  56.8%    
             
Total Gross Profit $781.3  $716.6   9.0 
Percent of Related Revenues  49.1%  48.8%    

Capital sales gross profit increased 14.3 percent on higher volumes whileand gross margin increased by 80$10.7 million and 110 basis points primarily due toduring fiscal 2014. The gross profit increase, despite somewhat lower revenue, comes from improved geographic and product mix and slightly improved costs on a full year basis.  Fiscal 2011 gross margin rates, driven by the effects of the items outlined below. Gross margin was favorably impacted by reversals of $1.7 million associated with previously recorded field corrective actions compared to charges of $12.2 million in the prior year. The recognition of a $2.8 million benefit from a change in our employee benefit program also included a $2.6favorably impacted gross margin in fiscal 2014. Further, the margin increase was partially offset by $6.0 million warranty charge for twoof inventory step-up associated with fiscal 2014 acquisitions compared to $2.5 million of inventory step-up recognized in fiscal 2013 resulting from the Aspen Surgical acquisition. In addition, we experienced improved margins in our International segment and in certain Surgical and Respiratory Care product retrofits.lines, but these were offset by weaker margins in our North America segment and the impact of the Trumpf acquisition.

Rental revenue gross profit was essentially flat anddecreased $11.1 million, but gross margin was also relatively unchanged.  Inincreased 40 basis points for fiscal 2011, a gain of 2.3 million was recognized in connection with a vendor’s product recall.  Absent such gains, gross margins would have declined2014. The margin increase is due to slight increases inthe recognition of a $2.8 million benefit from an employee benefit program change, coupled with lower depreciation expense and field service costs on flat revenues.costs.

Other

  Years Ended September 30 
        Percentage 
(Dollars in millions) 2014  2013  Change 
          
Research and development expenses $71.9  $70.2   2.4 
Percent of Total Revenue  4.3%  4.1%    
             
Selling and administrative expenses $548.3  $549.5   (0.2)
Percent of Total Revenue  32.5%  32.0%    
             
Special charges $37.1  $5.7   550.9 
             
Interest expense $(9.8) $(9.5)  3.2 
Investment income and other, net $2.4  $(1.4)  (27.4)
  Years Ended September 30 
        Percentage 
(Dollars in millions) 2011  2010  Change 
          
Research and development expenses $63.8  $58.3   9.4 
Percent of Total Revenues  4.0%  4.0%    
             
Selling and administrative expenses $502.0  $474.6   5.8 
Percent of Total Revenues  31.5%  32.3%    
             
Litigation charge (credit) $47.3  $(21.2)  n/a 
             
Special charges $1.4  $13.2   n/a 
             
Interest expense $(8.5) $(8.7)  (2.3)
Investment income and other, net $1.4  $(0.1)  n/a 

Research and development expenses increased 9.42.4 percent, as partnet of management’s focusa $1.2 million benefit associated with the employee benefit program change. The increase in expenses is due to increase investment inhigher spending on new product development.  Whiledevelopment initiatives and incremental spend related to the recent Trumpf acquisition. Selling and administrative expenses decreased $1.2 million. Selling and administrative expenses were favorably impacted by various cost control initiatives previously implemented, lower variable compensation expenses, and an employee benefit adjustment of $6.6 million referenced earlier. This decrease was partially offset by $10.3 million of acquisition and integration costs compared to $6.3 million in fiscal 2013 and an incremental $8.3 million of Trumpf-related selling and administrative expenses, grew in aggregate,along with higher medical device tax of $1.6 million. Despite the lower overall spend, selling and administrative expenses were up slightly as a percentage of salesrevenue on the expenses decreasedlower revenue.

28

During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we announced a global restructuring program to improve our cost structure. As part of this program, we offered an early retirement program to certain U.S. employees. Through this program, other reduction in force actions, and the elimination of certain contractor and open positions, we eliminated over 200 net positions primarily in the U.S. This portion of the program resulted in a special charge of $11.0 million related to severance and other benefits to be provided to affected employees. We also recorded a $3.2 million charge related to special pension and postretirement healthcare plan benefits granted to employees eligible for the early retirement program. The severance and other benefits and postretirement benefit charge balances reflect a $1.3 million reclassification compared to the original charge recorded in the second quarter of 2014. Subsequently during the fiscal year, we reversed $0.7 million of the severance and other benefits accrual due to certain plan participants declining continuing healthcare coverage, as well as other changes in circumstances affecting the estimated future payments to be made. This portion of the restructuring program is substantially complete, but cash expenditures will continue into fiscal year 2015. The global restructuring program is also reducing our European manufacturing capacity and streamlining our global operations by, 80 basis points.among other things, executing a back office process transformation program in Europe. The increaserestructuring in expenseEurope is in process and has resulted from increases in legal costs for litigationyear to date severance and patent related matters,benefit charges of $6.8 million. We have also incurred other costs associated with the upgradeglobal restructuring program of our information technology platform, increases in selling expenses led by higher commissions on the increased sales, higher variable compensation costs and the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange rates.  In addition, selling and administrative expenses in fiscal 2011 included approximately $3$4.6 million of costs related to community donationslegal and severance. Those higher costs were partially offset by lower marketing costsprofessional fees, temporary labor, project management, and improved employee benefit rates year-over-year.other administrative functions. All these actions are anticipated to yield annual cost savings of approximately $30 million after full implementation.

During fiscal 2011,2014, we initiated a plan to discontinue third-party payer rentals of therapy products occurring primarily in home care settings. We intend to continue renting these products to facilities and customers who are billed directly for the product. Due to this action, we recorded a litigationnon-cash impairment charge of $42.3$7.7 million for certain tangible assets for which the carrying values could not be fully recovered as a result of this strategic decision. We also eliminated approximately 70 positions and recognized a special charge of $2.0 million related to severance and other benefits for affected employees and $1.8 million in conjunction with reaching an agreement to settle a United States Officeother related costs. Over the remainder of Inspector General’s (“OIG”) investigation.  During the fourthfiscal year, we reversed $0.2 million of the other related costs as original estimates charged were excessive. The exit of this business was substantially complete by the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we also reached a settlement with Freedom Medical, Inc. with respect to an antitrust matter resulting in a litigation charge of $5.0 million.  During2015, but certain cash expenditures extended through fiscal 2010, we reversed a $21.2 million litigation accrual as the statute of limitations expired for any additional claims to be filed from those plaintiffs that opted out of the fiscal 2005 Spartanburg antitrust settlement.2015.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2011,2014, we recorded special charges ofinitiated a net $1.4 million primarily relatedplan to a combination of severance activities associated withimprove our 2010 restructuring activitiescost structure and additional write downs of assets held for sale relatedstreamline our organization by offering an early retirement program to certain manufacturing employees in our aviation assets.  During fiscal 2010, we took restructuring actionsBatesville, Indiana plant, meeting specific eligibility requirements, and recorded an asset write down charge of $3.9 million related to our aviation assets. Two separate restructuring actionsother minor reduction in force actions. These programs resulted in the elimination of approximately 26035 positions and cumulativerequired recognition of a special chargescharge of $9.3approximately $1 million primarilyfor lump sum payments under the program and severance and other benefits provided to other affected employees. This action was substantially complete by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2014.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we announced a plan to improve our cost structure and streamline our organization by eliminating in excess of 100 positions across the Company, roughly half of which were contract and open positions. This resulted in a special charge of $1.7 million related to severance and other benefits to be provided to affected employees. The majorityWe also incurred a contract termination charge of $0.6 million, a non-cash asset impairment charge of $0.2 million related to a product discontinuance action and $1.0 million in other related costs. We reversed $0.6 million of a fiscal 2012 severance and other benefits charge that was determined to be excessive during the second quarter of fiscal 2013. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2013, we continued actions under the previously announced plan and incurred charges of $0.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively. These actions and the related cash expenditures associatedare complete.

Interest expense was higher for fiscal 2014 due to incremental borrowings made in connection with the severance was completed by the end of our 2011 fiscal year with the remainder paid in fiscal 2012.acquisitions.

29


GAAP and Adjusted Earnings

Income before income taxes, income tax expense, and earnings attributable to common shareholders per diluted share are summarized in the table below. GAAP amounts are adjusted for certain items to aid management in evaluating the performance of the business.
  Years Ended September 30 
  2011  2010 
  
Income Before
Income Taxes
and NCI (1) (2)
                
(Dollars in millions, except for per share amounts) 
Income Tax
Expense (1)
  Diluted EPS  
Income Before
 Income Taxes
and NCI (2)
  
Income Tax
Expense
  
Diluted EPS
 (1)
 
                   
GAAP Earnings $159.7  $26.2  $2.09  $182.9  $56.9  $1.97 
Adjustments:                        
Litigation charge (credit)  47.3   14.2   0.52   (21.2)  (8.3)  (0.20)
Vendor product recall  (2.3)  (0.9)  (0.02)  -   -   - 
Special charges  1.4   0.5   0.01   13.2   5.0   0.13 
Acquisition and integration costs  1.0   0.4   0.01   -   -   - 
Recognition of previously unrecognized tax attributes  -   21.5   (0.34)  -   -   - 
Gain on sale of non-strategic assets  -   -   -   -   1.7   (0.03)
Tax settlement  -   -   -   -   6.5   (0.10)
                         
Adjusted Earnings $207.2  $61.8  $2.27  $174.9  $61.8  $1.76 
                         
(1) May not add due to rounding.                        
(2) NCI refers to our noncontrolling interest in our former Encompass joint venture.                 

  Years Ended September 30 
  2014  2013 
(Dollars in millions, except for per share amounts) 
Income Before
Income Taxes
  
Income Tax
Expense
  
Diluted EPS1
  
Income Before
Income Taxes
  
Income Tax
Expense
  Diluted EPS 
                   
GAAP Earnings $115.2  $54.6  $1.04  $144.0  $39.0  $1.74 
Adjustments:                        
Acquisition and integration costs  16.3   5.0   0.19   8.8   2.9   0.10 
Acquisition-related intangible asset amortization  28.8   8.7   0.34   27.7   10.1   0.29 
Field corrective actions  (1.7)  (0.6)  (0.02)  12.2   4.0   0.14 
Employee benefits change  (13.4)  (5.1)  (0.14)  -   -   - 
FDA remediation expenses  4.5   1.7   0.05   6.1   2.3   0.06 
Litigation charge  -   -   -   0.5   0.5   - 
Special charges  37.1   10.9   0.45   5.7   1.8   0.06 
Foreign valuation allowance and acquisition dividend tax  -   (20.3)  0.35   -   -   - 
International tax reorganization  -   -   -   -   0.8   (0.01)
                         
Adjusted Earnings $186.8  $54.9  $2.25  $205.0  $61.4  $2.38 

1  Total does not add due to rounding

The tax rate for fiscal 20112014 was 16.447.4 percent compared to 31.127.1 percent in the prior year. The effective ratestax rate for both fiscal 2011 and 2010 were favorably impacted by the recognition of discrete period tax benefits.  The lower rate in 20112014 is higher than fiscal 2013 due primarily to the fourthtax expense recognized in the second quarter recognition of $21.5this year to establish a full valuation allowance in France of $19.6 million related to its net deferred tax assets, primarily net operating losses. The effective rate for 2013 was favorably impacted by $5.4 million of previously unrecognizedperiod tax benefits associated predominantly with international operating loss carryforwards, as well as increased earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions andconsisting primarily of the one-time “catch-up” for the reinstatement of the research and development tax credit.  The effectivecredit, the release of various tax rate for 2010 was favorably impacted byreserves upon statute expiration and the resolutionfavorable impact of an income tax matter with the IRS of $6.5 million.law changes in select countries.

The adjusted effective tax rates were 29.829.4 and 35.330.0 percent for fiscal years 20112014 and 2010.  The lower rate in 2011 is due primarily to the benefit of increased earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions as well as the reinstatement of the research and development tax credit.  For fiscal 2011, we entered the year with no allowable credit, but its reinstatement in the first quarter allowed for a full year’s benefit in 2011 as well as required a retroactive “catch up” of previously unrecognized credits.  For fiscal 2010, the credit had expired at the end of our first quarter.2013.

Net income attributable to common shareholders was $133.3$60.6 million in fiscal 2011.2014 compared to $105.0 million in the prior year period, a decrease of 42.3 percent. On an adjusted basis, net income attributabledecreased $11.7 million, or 8.1 percent in 2014 compared to common shareholders increased $32.8 million, representing an increase of 29.2 percent.2013. Diluted earnings per share increased 6.1decreased 40.2 percent to $2.09on a reported basis and 5.5 percent on an adjusted basis increased 29.0 percent to $2.27.

26

over the same period.

Business Segment Results of Operations

The prior year segment information included below has been updated to reflect the previously discussed segment changes.
  Years Ended September 30  Percentage Change 
           Constant 
(Dollars in millions) 2014  2013  As Reported  Currency 
Revenue:            
North America $888.9  $958.3   (7.2)  (6.9)
Surgical and Respiratory Care  301.6   245.8   22.7   22.0 
International  495.6   512.1   (3.2)  (5.1)
     Total revenue $1,686.1  $1,716.2   (1.8)  (2.2)
                 
Divisional income:                
North America $165.0  $201.7   (18.2)    
Surgical and Respiratory Care  68.6   56.8   20.8     
International  24.9   33.5   (25.7)    

  Years Ended September 30  Percentage Change 
           Constant 
(Dollars in millions) 2011  2010  As Reported  Currency 
Revenues:            
North America $1,057.2  $958.2   10.3      10.0    
Surgical and Respiratory  132.9   123.3   7.8      7.8    
International  401.6   388.1   3.5      0.1    
     Total revenues $1,591.7  $1,469.6   8.3      7.2    
                 
Divisional income:                
North America $230.6  $185.7   24.2        
Surgical and Respiratory  40.0   38.1   5.0        
International  27.9   29.9     (6.7)        
Corporate expenses  (83.0)  (70.0)  18.6        
     Total divisional income $215.5  $183.7   17.3        
30


North America

North America capitalrevenue decreased 7.2 percent. Capital sales increased 17.9were down 6.6 percent the result of higher volumesrelated primarily to volume declines in nearly all product categories led by our patient support systems sales, which increased 28.1 percent.  Information technologywere down in a challenging and patient lifting products also posted solid gains.uncertain North American healthcare environment where there is continued pressure on capital spending. Rental revenues decreased 2.6revenue declined by 8.6 percent primarily due in part to a decline in rentals in the first partlower volumes, continued pricing pressure, and our discontinuance of the year driven by a weaker influenza season compared to the prior year, which impacted both ourthird-party payer therapy rental and moveable medical equipment businesses.  In addition, we also experienced declines in rental revenues in both our extended care and home care businesses.product rentals.

North America divisional income increased significantlydecreased due primarily to lower revenue and the increaseresulting decline in capitalgross profit. The lower gross profit resulting fromand somewhat higher volumesresearch and favorable product mix experienced during the year,development expenses were only partially offset by lower operating expenses, most notably lower selling and variable compensation costs, along with benefits from previously implemented restructuring programs. Capital margins were down primarily on lower volumes and unfavorable product mix. Rental margins were down as the costimpact of product retrofits.  Rental gross profit was down slightly on the lower revenues, but rental margins were generally consistent with the prior year despite slightly higherrevenue could not be fully offset by lower depreciation expense and reduced field service costs and depreciation due to a $2.3 million gain recognized in connection with a vendor’s product recall.  Operating expenses were slightly higher primarily as a result of new product investments and increased variable compensation, including commissions.costs.

Surgical and Respiratory Care

Surgical and Respiratory Care revenue increased 22.7 percent. Capital sales increased 30.1 percent related to higher sales volumes primarily in our surgical businesses and the impact of the Trumpf acquisition. Excluding the Trumpf acquisition, capital sales increased 5.8 percent, which benefited from double-digit growth in our respiratory care business.8.9 percent. Rental revenuesrevenue increased 9.5 percent driven by an increase in rentalslightly on improved volumes, of The Vest® respiratory care system.offsetting continued pricing pressure.

The increase in divisional income for the Surgical and Respiratory Care divisiondivisional income increased on the higher sales volumes and the resulting higher gross profit, despite somewhat lower gross margins due to the dilutive impact of the Trumpf acquisition. The higher gross profit was partially offset by increased research and development and other operating expense spending, generally driven by the Trumpf acquisition and higher gross profit on increased revenues, which more than offset slightly higher operating expenses for new product investments and increased variable compensation, including commissions.corporate expense allocations of $2.8 million. Overall, Trumpf contributed favorably to the improvement in divisional income.

International

International revenue decreased 3.2 percent. International capital sales increased 3.3decreased 4 percent, and were flat on a constant currency basis as volume growth in Latin America was offset by declines in the Middle East, Asia-Pacific and Europe.  Rental revenues increased 4.9 percent and 1.5or 5.7 percent on a constant currency basis. The increaseThese declines are due primarily to weaker sales in rental revenuesthe Middle East and Europe. Sales in the Middle East region tend to fluctuate based on the timing of large tender deals, while Europe’s healthcare environment continues to face pressure on capital spending similar to that in North America. Rental revenue increased 3.9 percent and was primarily the result offlat on a recent bariatric product introduction in Europe.constant currency basis.

International divisional income decreased 25.7 percent. Despite lower revenue, overall gross profit increased due to favorable foreign exchangewas only down slightly as higher margins on improved product mix offset most of the impacts and improved rental gross margin rates on flat costs, despite the costs of product retrofits.lower volumes. However, divisional income declined due to increasedhigher operating expenses were driven by increased research and development spending and higher operating costs associated with the employee related to investments in new product development, severancedeveloping markets and infrastructure costs and the effecthigher corporate allocations of unfavorable foreign exchange rates.$1.5 million.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
  Years Ended September 30 
(Dollars in millions) 2015  2014  2013 
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In):         
Operating activities $213.8  $210.3  $263.2 
Investing activities  (1,756.4)  (294.5)  (58.6)
Financing activities  1,642.7   63.8   (161.5)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (6.6)  (7.7)  - 
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents $93.5  $(28.1) $43.1 
  Years Ended September 30 
(Dollars in millions) 2012  2011  2010 
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In):         
Operating activities $261.7  $222.5  $139.8 
Investing activities  (539.5)  (78.0)  (38.2)
Financing activities  135.6   (101.9)  (87.4)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  1.9   (2.5)  (0.3)
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents $(140.3) $40.1  $13.9 

Net cash flows from operating activities and selected borrowings have represented our primary sources of funds for growth of the business, including capital expenditures and acquisitions. Our financing agreements contain no restrictive provisions or conditionscertain restrictions relating to dividend payments, working capital or additional unsecured indebtedness, (except to the extent that a dividend payment or incurrence of additional unsecured indebtedness would result in a default under our financing agreements), but there areand stronger limitations with respect to secured indebtedness. Our debt agreements also contain no credit rating triggers. Credit rating changes can, however, impact the cost of borrowings under our financing agreements.credit facility described below and any potential future borrowings.

31

Operating Activities

Our cash flows from operationsCash provided by operating activities during fiscal 20122015 was driven by net income, adjusted up for non-cash expenses including depreciation, amortization, stock compensation, and a pension settlement charge, offset by the provision for deferred income taxes and by changes in working capital. Cash provided by operating activities increased 1.7 percent from fiscal 2014, driven by improved working capital management, which more than offset lower net income, as adjusted for non-cash transactions.

Cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2014 was driven primarily by net income, adjusted for the non-cash effects of depreciation and amortization, stock compensation, an impairment loss, and the provision for deferred taxes. The collection of receivables outstanding as of our previous year end and subsequent to the Trumpf acquisition date also contributed to operating cash flow. These sources of cash were only partially offset by other working capital activities. Cash provided by operating activities was down compared to the prior year on lower net income and lower net cash provided by working capital activities, primarily associated with lower receivable collections. These reductions were partially offset by lower tax payments in fiscal 2014.

Cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2013 was driven by net income and improved working capital, including strong collections on high prior year-end receivables, adjusted by non-cash expenses related to depreciation and amortization, stock compensation, asset impairments and deferred taxes.  These sources of cash were offset by the payout of our performance-based compensation related to our 2011 fiscal year.

Fiscal 2012 operating cash flows were higher compared to fiscal 2011 primarily due to improved working capital, including a decrease in organic year-end receivables, and stable organic accounts payable compared to a large decrease in prior year, partially offset by lower net income.

Our cash flows from operations during fiscal 2011 were driven by net income, adjusted by non-cash expenses related to depreciation and amortization, stock compensation, and deferred taxes.  These net sources of cash were partially offset by the payout of our performance-based compensation and restructuring accruals related to our 2010 fiscal year.  Cash flows from changes in working capital were relatively flat during fiscal 2011 with improvements in inventories and other assets/liabilities offset by higher receivables on increased fourth quarter sales and lower accounts payable.

The increase in fiscal 2011 operating cash flows was due to improved financial performance, along with the timing of tax payments as well as lower pension contributions in the current year. Partially offsetting this improvement was the payment of $47.3 million in litigation settlements in the fourth quarter of 2011, increased year-end receivables from higher fourth quarter sales and higher payouts of performance-based compensation in fiscal 2011.

Fiscal 2010 cash flows from operations were driven primarily by net income, adjusted by non-cash expenses related to depreciation and amortization, stock compensation, deferred taxes and the release of a $21.2 million reserve related to a litigation credit. Uses of cash included $52.3 million of pension funding, increased income tax payments on higher net income and the settlement of prior year tax audits, and investments in inventory to meet our increasing backlog position.

Investing Activities

Our useCash used for investing activities during 2015 consisted mainly of investing cash flows during fiscal 2012 was driven primarily by our acquisitions of Aspen Surgical ($399.8 million) and Völker ($77.0 million) as well as capital expenditures.

The significant acquisition activity in 2012 drove the increased use of cash compared to 2011, along with and to a lesser extent, capital expenditures, which increased year-over-year.
Cash flows during fiscal 2011 were driven primarily by capital expenditures and payments for acquisitions. Capital expenditures increased from the prior year due to a lesser extentinvestments in our rental fleet to support volume increases from recent contract wins. Payments for acquisitions increased due to the acquisition of two Liko distributors.Welch Allyn in September 2015.

The increase in 2011 net cashCash used infor investing activities during 2014 consisted mainly of capital expenditures and payments for acquisitions. Capital expenditures decreased compared to fiscal 2010 wasthe prior year, but payments for acquisitions increased primarily due to lower proceeds received from the sale or callspurchases of our auction rate securities, higher business acquisition paymentsVirtus and capital expenditures in fiscal 2011.Trumpf.  

In fiscal 2010, our receipt of proceeds from the sale of a portion of our auction rate securities was more than offset by our cashCash used infor investing activities related toduring fiscal 2013 was driven by capital expenditures and an investment in a joint venture.expenditures.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2015 consisted mainly of new borrowings which were used to fund the Welch Allyn acquisition. Borrowings under our prior credit facility were also used to fund the higher rental fleet investment previously discussed. This was offset by treasury stock acquired, dividend payments, and payments to retire previously outstanding debt as this was replaced with the financing obtained in conjunction with the Welch Allyn acquisition. During the year ended September 30, 2015, we increased our dividends paid by $0.0375 per share compared to the prior year. This higher utilization of cash compared to the prior year period was more than offset by lower purchases of treasury stock and our borrowing activity.

Cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2014 consisted mainly of borrowings on our existing credit facility which were used to fund acquisition activity. This was offset by treasury stock acquired of $71.8 million, payments on outstanding debt of $95.2 million, and dividend payments of $34.2 million. During the year ended September 30, 2014, we increased our dividends paid by $0.07 per share compared to the prior year. This higher utilization of cash was more than offset by our borrowing activity, lower purchases of treasury stock, and higher proceeds on the exercise of stock options.

Cash used in financing activities in fiscal 20122013 primarily related to $260.0treasury stock acquired of $94.0 million, of additional borrowings, partially offset byrevolving and long-term debt payments of $50.0 million, shares repurchased in the open market of $42.4$45.1 million, and dividend payments to our shareholders of $30.1$31.2 million.

Our cash provided by financing activities in fiscal 2012 compared to our use of cash in financing activities in fiscal 2011 were primarily driven by our cash borrowings in fiscal 2012 and higher share repurchases in fiscal 2011.

In fiscal 2011, our use of cash for financing activities was primarily driven by $110.0 million related to share repurchases in the open market and $27.0 million of dividend payments to our shareholders, along with the purchase of the remaining interest in a former joint venture. These uses of cash were partially offset by cash proceeds from stock option exercises and other stock issuances under our employee stock purchase plan.

Our higher use of cash from financing activities in fiscal 2011 comparedThe treasury stock acquired balances referenced above refer to fiscal 2010 was due primarily to an increase in stock repurchases. Also impacting the variance was the purchase of the noncontrolling interest in our joint venture, offset by significant debt repayments in fiscal 2010 and higher proceeds from stock option exercises in fiscal 2011.

Our use of cash for financing activities during fiscal 2010 consisted mainly of a $45.0 million payment on our revolving credit facility, $34.5 million related to our share repurchasespurchases in the open market and $25.8 million in dividend payments to our shareholders. These usesthe repurchases of cash were partially offset by cash proceeds fromshares associated with employee payroll tax withholdings for restricted and deferred stock option exercises.distributions.

Our debt-to-capital ratio was 30.3, 16.965.9, 37.8, and 17.626.3 percent at September 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013. The changeincrease in 2012fiscal 2015 was primarily dueattributable to our debt more than doublingthe funding of the Welch Allyn acquisition, including the new borrowings obtained. Shareholders’ equity was also negatively impacted by treasury stock acquired and the other comprehensive losses associated with foreign currency translation. The increase in fiscal 2014 was attributable to increased borrowings used to fund the 2012 acquisitions.  The change from fiscal 2010 to fiscal 2011 was primarilyTrumpf acquisition and a decrease in shareholders’ equity due to highertreasury stock acquired and other comprehensive losses recognized associated with foreign currency translation and an increase in our net income, partially offset by share repurchases, which combined to produce higher shareholder’s equity.pension obligation.

32

Other Liquidity Matters

Net cash flows from operating activities and selected borrowings have representedIn September 2015, the Company entered into four new credit facilities for purposes of financing the Welch Allyn acquisition as well as refinancing our primary sources of funds for growthpreviously outstanding revolving credit facility. These new facilities consisted of the business, including capital expenditures and acquisitions.following:
·$1.0 billion senior secured Term Loan A facility (“TLA Facility”), maturing in September 2020
·$800.0 million senior secured Term Loan B facility (“TLB Facility”), maturing in September 2022
·Senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), providing borrowing capacity of up to $500.0 million, maturing in September 2020
·$425.0 million of senior unsecured notes (“Senior Notes”), maturing in September 2023

AsThe TLA Facility, TLB Facility, and Revolving Credit Facility (collectively, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”) all bear interest at variable rates which are currently less than 4.0 percent. These interest rates are based primarily on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), but under certain conditions could also be based on the U.S. Federal Funds Rate or the U.S. Prime Rate, at the Company’s option. The TLA Facility and TLB Facility have required principal payments. The TLA Facility requires minimum principal payments of September 30, 2012, we held investment securities with a fair value of $7.3$50.0 million which consisted of AAA rated student loan auction rate securities.  We have estimated the current fair value of our portfolio of auction rate securities based upon guidance provided by our investment advisors, including consideration of the credit quality of the underlying securitiesin fiscal 2016, $75.0 million in fiscal 2017, and the provisions of the respective security agreements.  At September 30, 2012, we have recorded temporary unrealized losses totaling $0.5$100.0 million on these securities to reflect the estimated decline in fair value associatedannually thereafter, with the current illiquidity in the auction rate market. If current market conditions do not improve or worsen, the result could be further realized or unrealized losses or impairments and liquidity and earnings could be adversely affected.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we entered into a new credit facility.  The new credit facility provides for revolving loans of up to $500.0 million, plus term loans in the aggregate amount of $200.0 million.  It is to be used for general corporate purposes, including financing permitted acquisitions.  The Company may request to increase the revolving loan commitment and the amount of the term loans by up to an additional $250.0 million.  All amounts due under the new credit facility mature upon expiration on August 24, 2017.  The term loans will amortize so that 37.5 percent of theremaining unpaid principal will be repaid over the five year term, with the balance due at maturity. The newTLB Facility requires annual principal payments of $8.0 million with the remaining unpaid principal balance due at maturity. We will be able to voluntarily prepay outstanding loans under the TLA Facility and the TLB Facility at any time.

At September 30, 2015, there were no borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility, but available borrowing capacity was $490.9 million after giving effect to $9.1 million of outstanding standby letters of credit. At September 30, 2014, there were $42.4 million of outstanding standby letters of credit facility replaces in its entiretyunder our previous $500.0revolving credit agreements, $39.8 million of which pertained to one standby letter of credit agreement dated March 28, 2008, as amended,issued in connection with the Trumpf acquisition, which was scheduled to expireexpired in March 2013.  Borrowings under the credit facility and term loan bear interest at variable rates specified therein, that for fiscal 2012 were under 2.0 percent, and theJanuary 2015. The availability of borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility is subject to our ability at the time of borrowing to meet certain specified conditions, including compliance with covenants contained in the governing credit agreement.

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities are held with a syndicate of banks, which includes over 20 institutions. The general corporate assets of the Company and its subsidiaries collateralize these obligations. The credit agreement governing these facilities contains financial covenants which specify a maximum secured net leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, as such terms are defined in the facility.credit agreement. These financial covenants are measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, with the first measurement date on December 31, 2015. The required ratios vary through December 31, 2019 providing a gradually decreasing maximum secured net leverage ratio and a gradually increasing minimum interest coverage ratio, as set forth in the table below:

Fiscal Quarter Ended
Maximum
Secured Net
Leverage Ratio
Minimum
Interest Coverage
Ratio
December 31, 20154.75x3.25x
December 31, 20164.50x3.25x
December 31, 20174.00x3.50x
December 31, 20183.50x3.75x
December 31, 2019 and thereafter3.00x4.00x

The Senior Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.75 percent annually. These notes were issued at par in a private placement offering and are not registered on any public market. All of the Senior Notes are outstanding as of September 30, 2015. We are not required to make any mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the Notes, other than in certain circumstances such as a change in control or material sale of assets. We may redeem the notes prior to maturity, but doing so prior to September 1, 2021 would require payment of a premium on any amounts redeemed, the amount of which varies based on the timing of the redemption. The indenture governing the Senior Notes contains certain covenants which impose limitations on the amount of dividends we may pay and the amount of common shares we may repurchase in the open market, but we do not expect these covenants to affect our current dividend policy or open share repurchase program. The terms of this indenture also impose certain restrictions on the amount and type of additional indebtedness we may obtain in the future, as well as the types of liens and guarantees we may provide.

 
AsWe are in compliance with all applicable financial covenants as of September 30, 2012, we had outstanding borrowings of $105.0 million2015 and undrawn letters of credit of $5.8 million under the $500.0 million five-year facility, leaving $389.2 million of borrowing capacity available under the facility.  The outstanding balance on the term loan was $197.5 million at September 30, 2012, of which $10.0 million is recognized as the current portion of the balance due.November 12, 2015.

We also have trade finance credit lines and uncommitted letter of credit facilities.  These lines are associated with the normal course of business and do not currently, nor have they historically, been of a material size to the overall business.

We have $49.4$43.4 million of senior notesunsecured debentures outstanding at various fixed interest rates as of September 30, 2012,2015, classified as long-term in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Our primary pension plans investplan invests in a variety of equity and debt securities. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we contributed $50.0 million to our primary pension plan. At September 30, 2012,2015, our latest measurement date, our pension plans were underfunded by approximately $81$96.4 million. Given the significant funding contribution made during fiscal 2010,Based on our current funded status, we currently do not anticipate any further contributions to our primary pension plan in fiscal 2013.2016.

As previously disclosed, weWe intend to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends comparable to those paid in the periods covered by these financial statements. However, the declaration and payment of dividends by us will be subject to the sole discretion of our Board and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, covenants associated with debt obligations, legal requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our Board.

On September 8, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Welch Allyn for a purchase price of $2.1 billion, including the value of 8.1 million shares of common stock which were issued to the seller as consideration for the transaction. The cash portion of the purchase price was funded with the new credit facilities previously discussed. On August 1, 2014, we completed the acquisition of Trumpf for $223.6 million (net of cash acquired). We funded this transaction with a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under our prior revolving credit facility.

Over the long term, we intend to continue to pursue selective acquisition candidatesinorganic growth in certain areas of our business, but the timing, size or success of any acquisition effort and the related potential capital commitments cannot be predicted. We expect to fund future acquisitions primarily with cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings, within our set limits.

During fiscal 2012,2015, we repurchased 1.5purchased 1.2 million shares of our common stock for $42.4$54.8 million in the open market.  As of September 30, 2012, 0.5market, leaving 64.7 million shares were available for purchasepurchase. The common stock was acquired under our existing board authorization,a $190 million share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors in September 2013, which does not have an expiration date. In October 2012,There are no plans to terminate this program in the Board approved an expansionfuture, but with the acquisition of its previously announcedWelch Allyn and the increased borrowings obtained to finance the transaction, we will suspend our share repurchase authorization by 3.5 million shares.activity temporarily to focus on deleveraging. Repurchases may be made on the open market or via private transactions, and are used for general business purposes.

We believe that cash on hand and generated from operations, along with amounts available under our credit facility, will be sufficient to fund operations, working capital needs, capital expenditure requirements, and financing obligations.obligations for at least the next twelve months. However, disruption and volatility in the credit markets could impede our access to capital. Our $500.0 million revolving credit facility is with a syndicate of banks.  The syndication group consists of 11 financial institutions,banks, which we believe reduces our exposure to any one institution and would still leave us with significant borrowing capacity in the event that any one of the institutions within the group is unable to comply with the terms of our agreement.

As of September 30, 2015, approximately 49 percent of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held by our subsidiaries in foreign countries. Portions of this may be subject to U.S. income taxation if repatriated to the U.S. However, cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries are largely used for operating needs outside the U.S. Therefore, we have no need to repatriate this cash for other uses. We believe that cash on hand and generated from operations, along with amounts available under our credit facility, will be sufficient to fund operations, working capital needs, capital expenditure requirements and financing obligations.

Credit Ratings

ForDuring fiscal 2012,2015, Standard and Poor’s Rating Services and Moody’s Investor Service provided aissued credit ratingratings for Hill-Rom of BBBBB+ and Baa3Ba2, respectively, with stable outlooks.

Other Uses of Cash

We expect capital spending in 20132016 to be between $75 and $80approximately $110 to $120 million. Capital spending will be monitored and controlled as the year progresses.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements.


Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments

To give a clear picture of matters potentially impacting our liquidity position, the following table outlines our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2012:2015:

  Payments Due by Period 
     Less Than   1 - 3   3 - 5  After 5 
(Dollars in millions) Total  1 Year   Years   Years  Years 
Contractual Obligations                 
Long-term debt obligations $2,272.3  $58.0  $194.3  $791.2  $1,228.8 
Interest payments relating to long-term debt (1)  561.3   78.7   166.2   164.0   152.4 
Operating lease obligations  73.8   28.2   30.5   9.5   5.6 
Pension and postretirement                    
    health care benefit funding (2)  31.7   2.9   6.0   6.3   16.5 
Purchase obligations (3)  174.8   132.0   31.3   11.2   0.3 
Other long-term liabilities (4)  38.5   -   15.4   15.2   7.9 
Total contractual cash obligations $3,152.4  $299.8  $443.7  $997.4  $1,411.5 
  Payments Due by Period 
     Less Than  1 - 3  4 - 5  After 5 
(Dollars in millions) Total  1 Year  Years  Years  Years 
Contractual Obligations                 
Long-term debt obligations $247.5  $10.0  $27.5  $160.0  $50.0 
Interest payments relating to long-term debt (1)  59.9   6.3   12.1   10.5   31.0 
Operating lease obligations  59.8   19.7   23.2   12.4   4.5 
Pension and postretirement                    
    health care benefit funding (2)  15.8   1.3   2.7   3.2   8.6 
Purchase obligations (3)  44.6   32.7   11.5   0.4   - 
Other long-term liabilities (4)  29.7   -   15.6   12.4   1.7 
Total contractual cash obligations $458.3  $71.0  $92.6  $198.9  $95.8 

(1)Interest payments on our long-term debt are projected based on the contractual rates of remaining debt securities.

(2)Given the significant funding contribution made during fiscal 2010,Based on our funded status as of September 30, 2015, we currently do not anticipate any further contributions to our master pension plan in fiscal 2013.2016.

(3)Purchase obligations represent contractual obligations under various take-or-pay arrangements executed in the normal course of business. These commitments represent future purchases in line with expected usage to obtain favorable pricing. Also included are obligations arising from purchase orders for which we have made firm commitments. As a result, we believe that the purchase obligations portion of our contractual obligations is substantially those obligations for which we are certain to pay, regardless of future facts and circumstances. We expect to fund purchase obligations with operating cash flows and current cash balances.

(4)Other long-term liabilities include deferred compensation arrangements, self-insurance reserves, and other various liabilities.

We also had commercial commitments related to standby letters of credit at September 30, 20122015 of $7.2$9.1 million.

In addition to the contractual obligations and commercial commitments disclosed above, we also have a variety of other agreements related to the procurement of materials and services and other commitments. While many of these agreements are long-term supply agreements, some of which are exclusive supply or complete requirements-based contracts, we are not committed under these agreements to accept or pay for requirements which are not needed to meet production needs. Also, we have an additional $10.6$5.8 million of other liabilities as of September 30, 2012,2015, which represent uncertain tax positions for which it is not possible to determine in which future period the tax liability might be settled.

In conjunction with our acquisition and divestiture activities, we have entered into certain guarantees and indemnifications of performance, as well as, non-competition agreements for varying periods of time. Potential losses under the indemnifications are generally limited to a portion of the original transaction price, or to other lesser specific dollar amounts for certain provisions. Guarantees and indemnifications with respect to acquisition and divestiture activities, if triggered, could have a materially adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We are also subject to potential losses from adverse litigation results that are not accounted for by a self-insurance or other reserves; however, such potential losses are not quantifiable at this time, and may never occur.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our accounting policies, including those described below, require management to make significant estimates and assumptions using information available at the time the estimates are made. Such estimates and assumptions significantly affect various reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenuesrevenue and expenses. If future experience differs materially from these estimates and assumptions, results of operations and financial condition could be affected. Our most critical accounting policies are described below.

35

Revenue Recognition

Net revenues reflectrevenue reflects gross revenuesrevenue less sales discounts and allowances and customer returns for product sales and rental revenue reserves. Revenue is evaluated under the following criteria and recognized when each is met:

Evidence of an arrangement: An agreement with the customer reflecting the terms and conditions to deliver products or services serves as evidence of an arrangement.

Delivery: For products, delivery is considered to occur upon receipt by the customer and the transfer of title and risk of loss. For rental services, delivery is considered to occur when the services are rendered.

Fixed or determinable price: The sales price is considered fixed or determinable if it is not subject to refund or adjustment.

Collection is deemed probable: At or prior to the time of a transaction, credit reviews of each customer are performed to determine the creditworthiness of the customer. Collection is deemed probable if the customer is expected to be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as those amounts become due. If collection is not probable, revenue is recognized when collection becomes probable, generally upon cash collection.

As a general interpretation of the above guidelines, revenuesrevenue for health care and surgical products are generally recognized upon delivery of the products to the customer and their assumption of risk of loss and other risks and rewards of ownership. Local business customs and non-standard sales terms can sometimes result in deviations to this normal practice in certain instances; however, in no case is revenue recognized prior to the transfer of risk of loss and rewards of ownership.

For non-invasive therapy products and medical equipment management services, the majority of product offerings are rental products for which revenues arerevenue is recognized consistent with the rendering of the service and use of products. For The Vest®Vest® product, revenue is generally recognized at the time of receipt of authorization for billing from the applicable paying entity as this serves as evidence of the arrangement and sets a fixed or determinable price.

For health care products and services aimed at improving operational efficiency and asset utilization, various revenue recognition techniques are used, depending on the offering. Arrangements to provide services, routinely under separately sold service and maintenance contracts, result in the deferral of revenuesrevenue until specified services are performed. Service contract revenue is generally recognized ratably over the contract period, if applicable, or as services are rendered. Product-related goods are generally recognized upon delivery to the customer.

Revenue and Accounts Receivable Reserves

Revenues areRevenue is presented in the Statements of Consolidated Income net of certain discounts, GPO fees, and sales adjustments. For product sales, we record reserves resulting in a reduction of revenue for contractual discounts, as well as price concessions and product returns. Likewise, rental revenue reserves, reflecting contractual and other routine billing adjustments, are recorded as a reduction of revenues.revenue. Reserves for revenue are estimated based upon historical rates for revenue adjustments.

Provisions for doubtful accounts are recorded as a component of operating expenses and represent our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses and collection risk in our existing accounts receivable. We determine such reserves based on historical write-off experience by industry. Receivables are generally reviewed on a pooled basis based on historical collection experience for each receivable type and are also reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged against the allowance when we believe it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. We do not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to our customers.

If circumstances change, such as higher than expected claims denials, payment defaults, changes in our business composition or processes, adverse changes in general economic conditions, instability or disruption of credit markets, or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s or payor’spayer’s ability to meet its obligations, our estimates of the realizability of trade receivables could be reduced by a material amount.

Liabilities for Loss Contingencies Related to Lawsuits

We are involved on an ongoing basis in claims, investigations and lawsuits relating to our operations, including environmental, antitrust, patent infringement, business practices, commercial transactions and other matters. The ultimate outcome of these actions cannot be predicted with certainty. An estimated loss from these contingencies is recognized when we believe it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. However, it is difficult to measure the actual loss that might be incurred related to claims, investigations and lawsuits. The ultimate outcome of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

36

We are also involved in other possible claims, including product and general liability, workers’ compensation, auto liability and employment related matters. Claims other than employment related mattersSuch claims in the United States have deductibles and self-insured retentions ranging from $150$25 thousand to $1.5$1.0 million per occurrence or per claim, depending upon the type of coverage and policy period. Outside insurance companiesInternational deductibles and third-partyself-insured retentions are lower. We are also generally self-insured up to certain stop-loss limits for certain employee health benefits, including medical, drug and dental. Our policy is to estimate reserves based upon a number of factors including known claims, administrators establish individual claim reserves and an independent outside actuary provides estimates of ultimate projected losses, includingestimated incurred but not reported claims and outside actuarial analysis, which are used to establishbased on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Such estimated reserves for losses. Claim reserves for employment related matters are established based upon advice from internalclassified as Other Current Liabilities and external counsel and historical settlement information for claims and related fees, when such amounts are considered probable of payment.Other Long-Term Liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The recorded amounts represent our best estimate of the costs we will incur in relation to such exposures, but it is possible that actual costs could differ from those estimates.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

We account for acquired businesses using the acquisition method of accounting. This method requires that the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed be measured at their fair value, with goodwill being the excess value of consideration paid less the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. Judgments and estimates are required in the determination of fair values, including the setting of discount rates, growth rates and forecasted business results for the acquired business and portions of the acquired business, along with estimated useful lives. Changes in these judgments or estimates can have a material impact on the valuation of the respective assets and liabilities acquired and our results of operations.

We perform an impairment assessment on goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles annually during the third fiscal quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit may not be recoverable. These events or conditions include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in the business environment; regulatory environment or legal factors; a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of such losses or a projection of continuing losses; a substantial decline in market capitalization of our stock; or a sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit.

The goodwill impairment assessment requires either evaluating qualitative factors or performing a quantitative assessment to determine thatif a reporting unit’s carrying value would be moreis likely than not to exceed its fair value. The qualitative goodwill impairment assessment requires evaluating factors to determine that a reporting unit’s carrying value would not more likely than not exceed its fair value. As part of our goodwill qualitative testing process for each reporting unit, when utilized, we evaluate various factors that are specific to the reporting unit as well as industry and macroeconomic factors in order to determine whether it is reasonably likely to have a material impact on the fair value of our reporting units. Examples of the factors that wereare considered includedinclude the results of the most recent impairment test, current and long-range forecasted financial results, and changes in the strategic outlook or organizational structure of the reporting units. The long-range financial forecasts of the reporting units, which are based upon management’s long-term view of our markets and are used by senior management and the Board of Directors to evaluate operating performance, wereare compared to the forecasts used in the prior year analysis to determine if management expectations for the business have changed. Management changes in strategic outlook or organizational structure represent internally driven strategic or organizational changes that could have a material impact on our results of operations or product offerings. Industry, market changes and macroeconomic indicators represent our view on changes outside of the Company that could have a material impact on our results of operations, product offerings or future cash flow forecasts. In the event we were to determine that a reporting unit’s carrying value would more likely than not exceed its fair value, quantitative testing would be performed comparing carrying values to estimated fair values. Changes in management intentions, market conditions, operating performance and other similar circumstances could affect the assumptions used in this qualitative impairment test. Changes in the assumptions could result in impairment charges that could be material to our Consolidated Financial Statements in any given period.

Quantitative testing involves a two-step process. The first step, used to identify potential impairment, is a comparison of each reporting unit’s estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, applicable goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, there is an indication of impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment. The second step requires us to calculate an implied fair value of goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess.

The
37

Measurement of the fair value of reporting units in the first step of a quantitative impairment process requires significant management judgment with respect to forecasted sales, gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures, the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate, the selection of comparable public companies and the determination of an appropriate control premium. In addition, the use of third-party appraisals of significant tangible and intangible assets as part of the second step of the impairment test also requires management judgment related to certain inputs and assumptions. There are inherent uncertainties related to each of the above listed assumptions and inputs, and our judgment in applying them. The use of different assumptions, estimates or judgments in either step of the process could trigger the need for an impairment charge, or materially increase or decrease the relatedamount of any such impairment charge.

Retirement Benefit Plans

We sponsor retirement and postretirement benefit plans covering select employees. Expense recognized in relation to these defined benefit retirement plans and the postretirement health care planplans is based upon actuarial valuations and inherent in those valuations are key assumptions including discount and mortality rates, and where applicable, expected returns on assets, projected future salary rates and projected health care cost trends. The discount rates used in the valuation of our defined benefit pension and postretirement plans are evaluated annually based on current market conditions. In setting these rates we utilize long-term bond indices and yield curves as a preliminary indication of interest rate movements, and then make adjustments to the respective indices to reflect differences in the terms of the bonds covered under the indices in comparison to the projected outflow of our obligations. Our overall expected long-term rate of return on pension assets is based on historical and expected future returns, which are inflation adjusted and weighted for the expected return for each component of the investment portfolio. Our rate of assumed compensation increase is also based on our specific historical trends of past wage adjustments.

Changes in retirement and postretirement benefit expense and the recognized obligations may occur in the future as a result of a number of factors, including changes to any of these assumptions. Our expected rate of return on pension plan assets was 6.8 percent for fiscal 2015 and 7.0 percent for fiscal 20122014 and 7.5 percent for 2011 and 2010.2013. At September 30, 2012,2015, we had pension plan assets of $246.8$219.1 million. A 25 basis point increase in the expected rate of return on pension plan assets reduces annual pension expense by approximately $0.6 million. Differences between actual and projected investment returns, especially in periods of significant market volatility, can also impact estimates of required pension contributions. The discount rate for our retirement obligation was 4.14.4 percent in 2012, 4.62015, 4.5 percent in 20112014 and 5.15.0 percent in 2010.2013. The discount rate for our postretirement obligationobligations may vary up to 100200 basis points from that of our retirement obligations. For each 50 basis point change in the discount rate, the impact to annual pension expense ranges from $2.0an increase of $2.4 million to $2.1a decrease of $2.2 million, while the impact to our postretirement health care plan expense would be less than $0.1 million. Impacts from assumption changes could be positive or negative depending on the direction of the change in rates.

Income Taxes

We compute our income taxes using an asset and liability approach to reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and the corresponding income tax amounts. We have a variety of deferred tax assets in numerous tax jurisdictions. These deferred tax assets are subject to periodic assessment as to recoverability and if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized, valuation allowances are recognized. We have recorded valuation allowances against certain of our deferred tax assets, primarily those related to foreign tax attributes in countries with poor operating results and certain other domestic tax attributes. In evaluating whether it is more likely than not that we would recover these deferred tax assets, future taxable income, the reversal of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies are considered.

We believe that our estimates for the valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets are appropriate based on current facts and circumstances. We currently have $8.6$40.7 million of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets, on a tax-effected basis, relating primarily related to certain foreign deferred tax attributes.attributes and state tax credit carryforwards.

We account for uncertain income tax positions using a threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The difference between the tax benefit recognized in the financial statements for an uncertain income tax position and the tax benefit claimed in the tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit.

38

We also have on-going audits in various stages of completion with the IRS and several state and foreign jurisdictions, one or more of which may conclude within the next 12 months. Such settlements could involve some or all of the following: the payment of additional taxes, the adjustment of certain deferred taxes and/or the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits. The resolution of these matters, in combination with the expiration of certain statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions, make it reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits may decrease as a result of either payment or recognition by approximately $3$0.5 to $7$1.5 million in the next twelve months, excluding interest.

Guarantees

We routinely grant limited warranties on our products with respect to defects in material and workmanship. The terms of these warranties are generally one year, however, certain components and products have substantially longer warranty periods. We recognize a reserve with respect to these obligations at the time of product sale, with subsequent warranty claims recorded directly against the reserve. The amount of the warranty reserve is determined based on historical trend experience for the covered products. For more significant warranty-related matters which might require a broad-based correction, separate reserves are established when such events are identified and the cost of correction can be reasonably estimated.

Inventory

We review the net realizable value of inventory on an ongoing basis, considering factors such as excess, obsolescence, and other items. We record an allowance for estimated losses when the facts and circumstances indicate that particular inventories will not be sold at prices in excess of current carrying costs. These estimates are based on historical experience and expected future trends. If future market conditions vary from those projected, and our estimates prove to be inaccurate, we may be required to write down inventory values and record an adjustment to cost of revenues.revenue.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

For a summary of recently issued accounting guidance applicable to us, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 

 
 
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVEQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to various market risks, including fluctuations in interest rates, the impact of the current economic downturn,downturns, collection risk associated with our accounts and notes receivable portfolio, including the effects of various austerity measures initiated by some governmental authorities, and variability in currency exchange rates. We have established policies, procedures and internal processes governing our management of market risks and the use of financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks.

We are subject to variability in foreign currency exchange rates in our international operations. Exposure to this variability is periodically managed primarily through the use of natural hedges, whereby funding obligations and assets are both managed in the local currency. We, from time-to-time, enter into currency exchange agreements to manage our exposure arising from fluctuating exchange rates related to specific and forecasted transactions. We operate this program pursuant to documented corporate risk management policies and do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes. The sensitivity of earnings and cash flows to variability in exchange rates is assessed by applying an appropriate range of potential rate fluctuations to our assets, obligations and projected results of operations denominated in foreign currencies.

Our currency risk consists primarily of foreign currency denominated firm commitments and forecasted foreign currency denominated intercompany and third-party transactions. At September 30, 2012,2015, we had outstanding foreign exchange derivative contracts in notional amounts of $5.3$6.7 million with the fair value of these contracts approximating original contract value. The maximum length of time over which we hedge transaction exposure is 15 months. Derivative gains/(losses), initially reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), are reclassified to earnings in the period when the forecasted transaction affects earnings.

We hold auctionare exposed to market risk from fluctuations in interest rates. The Company sometimes manages its exposure to interest rate securities, for whichfluctuations through the market continues to experience liquidity issues.  Due to the lackuse of liquidity, we have obtained guidance from our investment advisors as to the current fair valueinterest rate swaps (cash flow hedges). As of our portfolio.  If current market conditions do not improve, or if they worsen, the result could be further temporary unrealized losses or impairments.  At September 30, 2012,2015, we had $7.3 million remaining in auctiondid not have any outstanding interest rate securities.swaps.

Our pension plan assets, which were approximately $247$219.1 million at September 30, 2012,2015, are also subject to volatility that can be caused by fluctuations in general economic conditions. Our pension plans were underfunded at September 30, 20122015 by approximately $81$96.4 million, a slightan increase over the prior year based upon a decrease in the discount rate which increased the overall pension obligation. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we contributed $50.0 million to our primary pension plan.and lower returns on plan assets. Continued market volatility and disruption could cause declines in asset values and low interest rates could continue to keep our pension obligation high. Should such trends continue, we may need to make additional pension plan contributions and our pension expense in future years may increase. Investment strategies and policies are set by the plan’s fiduciaries. Long-term strategic investment objectives utilize a diversified mix of equity and fixed income securities to preserve the funded status of the trusts and balance risk and return. The plan fiduciaries oversee the investment allocation process, which includes selecting investment managers, setting long-term strategic targets and monitoring asset allocations. Target allocation ranges are guidelines, not limitations, and plan fiduciaries may occasionally approve allocations above or below a target range or elect to rebalance the portfolio within the targeted range.

Trust assets are invested subject to the following policy restrictions: short-term securities must be rated A2/P2 or higher; all fixed-income securities shall have a credit quality rating “BBB” or higher; investments in equities in any one company may not exceed 10 percent of the equity portfolio.
 
 
Item 8. FINANCIALFINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
Page
Financial Statements: 
3842
3943
4044
45
4146
4247
4348
4449
  
Financial Statement Schedule for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010:2013: 
8183
  
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto. 
 

 
MANAGEMENT’SMANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (“we” or “our”). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed, under the supervision of our principal executive, principal financial and principal accounting officers, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.in the United States. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:

1)Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

2) 
2)
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our Board of Directors; and

3)Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

Management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20122015 using criteria established in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (COSO). Based on thatthese criteria, management concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012.2015.

We have excluded Völker group and Aspen Surgical Products Holding, Inc. from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012, because they were acquired by us in separate purchase business combinations during 2012.  Völker group is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 5 percent and 4 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012.  Aspen Surgical Products Holding, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 15 percent and 1 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20122015 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, who also audited our Consolidated Financial Statements, as stated in their report included herein.

We have excluded Welch Allyn Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Welch Allyn”) from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2015, because Welch Allyn was acquired by us in a purchase business combination in the fourth quarter of 2015. Welch Allyn is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenue represent 9 percent and 3 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2015.

/s/ John J. Greisch
John J. Greisch
President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ MarkSteven J. GuinanStrobel
MarkSteven J. GuinanStrobel
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


/s/ Richard G. Keller
Richard G. Keller
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
 
 
REPORTREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries at September 30, 2012,2015 and 2011,2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2012,2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012,2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Völker groupWelch Allyn Holdings, Inc. and Aspen Surgical Products Holding, Inc.its subsidiaries (collectively, “Welch Allyn”) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012,2015, because they were acquired by the Company in separatea purchase business combinationscombination during 2012.2015. We have also excluded Völker group and Aspen Surgical Products Holding, Inc.Welch Allyn from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Völker groupWelch Allyn is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenuesrevenue represent 5%9 percent and 4%,3 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012.  Aspen Surgical Products Holding, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 15% and 1%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012.
2015.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
November 15, 201219, 2015
 
 
 
3943

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
(Dollars in millions except per share data)
  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011  2010 
Net Revenues         
Capital sales $1,198.2  $1,119.0  $996.6 
Rental revenues  436.1   472.7   473.0 
Total revenues  1,634.3   1,591.7   1,469.6 
             
Cost of Revenues            
Cost of goods sold  690.4   606.8   548.6 
Rental expenses  189.2   203.6   204.4 
Total cost of revenues  879.6   810.4   753.0 
             
Gross Profit  754.7   781.3   716.6 
             
Research and development expenses  66.9   63.8   58.3 
Selling and administrative expenses  496.4   502.0   474.6 
Litigation (credit) charge (Note 13)  (3.6)  47.3   (21.2)
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles (Note 3)  8.0   -   - 
Special charges (Note 8)  18.2   1.4   13.2 
             
             
Operating Profit  168.8   166.8   191.7 
             
Interest expense  (6.5)  (8.5)  (8.7)
Investment income and other, net  1.2   1.4   (0.1)
             
Income Before Income Taxes  163.5   159.7   182.9 
             
Income tax expense (Note 9)  42.7   26.2   56.9 
             
Net Income  120.8   133.5   126.0 
             
Less:  Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  -   0.2   0.7 
             
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $120.8  $133.3  $125.3 
             
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders            
per Common Share - Basic $1.94  $2.11  $1.99 
             
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders            
per Common Share - Diluted $1.94  $2.09  $1.97 
             
             
Dividends per Common Share $0.49  $0.43  $0.41 
             
Average Common Shares Outstanding - Basic (thousands) (Note 10)  62,120   63,164   62,934 
             
Average Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted (thousands) (Note 10)  62,361   63,899   63,739 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
40

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions except share data)

  September 30 
  2012  2011 
ASSETS      
Current Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $84.3  $224.6 
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $38.5 in 2012 and $26.7 in 2011 (Note 1)  392.6   386.2 
Inventories (Note 1)  126.9   95.6 
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9)  48.6   42.9 
Other current assets  29.4   42.4 
Total current assets  681.8   791.7 
         
Property, plant and equipment (Note 1)  834.9   819.6 
Less accumulated depreciation  (584.8)  (596.8)
Property, plant and equipment, net  250.1   222.8 
Investments and investment securities (Notes 1 and 5)  7.3   11.1 
Intangible assets:        
Goodwill (Notes 1, 2 and 3)  335.2   87.2 
Software and other, net (Notes 1 and 2)  290.8   126.1 
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9)  38.9   33.8 
Other assets  23.5   26.4 
Total Assets $1,627.6  $1,299.1 
         
LIABILITIES        
Current Liabilities        
Trade accounts payable $80.7  $64.8 
Short-term borrowings (Note 4)  115.2   100.3 
Accrued compensation  73.4   92.7 
Accrued product warranties (Note 1)  42.2   17.8 
Other current liabilities  66.6   58.4 
Total current liabilities  378.1   334.0 
         
Long-term debt (Note 4)  237.5   50.8 
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits (Note 6)  89.6   87.4 
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9)  68.1   36.2 
Other long-term liabilities  41.7   49.0 
Total Liabilities  815.0   557.4 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13)        
         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Note 7)        
Capital Stock:        
Preferred stock - without par value:        
Authorized - 1,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding  -   - 
Common stock - without par value:        
Authorized - 199,000,000        
Issued - 80,323,912 shares in 2012 and 2011  4.4   4.4 
Additional paid-in-capital  116.8   114.1 
Retained earnings  1,400.3   1,309.8 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (Note 1)  (78.0)  (79.0)
Treasury stock, common shares at cost:  2012 - 19,526,989 and 2011 - 18,637,540  (630.9)  (607.6)
Total Shareholders' Equity  812.6   741.7 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $1,627.6  $1,299.1 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
41

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)

  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011  2010 
          
Operating Activities         
Net income $120.8  $133.5  $126.0 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  111.7   103.9   99.7 
Litigation credit  -   -   (21.2)
Provision for deferred income taxes  (32.3)  (21.5)  21.2 
Loss on disposal of property, equipment leased to others, intangible assets and impairments  8.1   1.3   7.3 
Stock compensation  11.6   12.2   12.0 
Tax settlement  -   (4.9)  (8.2)
Defined benefit plan funding  (1.6)  (1.4)  (52.3)
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans  (1.3)  (6.8)  - 
Change in working capital excluding cash, current investments, current debt, acquisitions and dispositions:            
Trade accounts receivable  20.1   (24.7)  (7.0)
Inventories  4.4   14.7   (16.2)
Other current assets  20.9   14.4   (37.5)
Trade accounts payable  0.3   (18.0)  (2.4)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities  (6.1)  10.0   12.5 
Other, net  5.1   9.8   5.9 
Net cash provided by operating activities  261.7   222.5   139.8 
Investing Activities            
Capital expenditures and purchase of intangibles  (77.8)  (68.9)  (64.7)
Proceeds on sales of property and equipment leased to others  10.6   5.9   2.5 
Payment for acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired  (476.8)  (15.5)  (7.3)
Proceeds on investment sales and maturities  4.5   0.5   31.3 
Net cash used in investing activities  (539.5)  (78.0)  (38.2)
Financing Activities            
Net change in short-term debt  (7.8)  (0.4)  (4.1)
Net change in revolver  60.0   (0.2)  (45.0)
Proceeds from long-term debt  200.0   -   - 
Payment of long-term debt  (50.0)  -   - 
Debt issuance costs  (2.6)  -   - 
Purchase of noncontrolling interest  (1.6)  (11.8)  - 
Payment of cash dividends  (30.1)  (27.0)  (25.8)
Distribution to noncontrolling interest partner  -   -   (1.1)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  7.7   43.1   22.9 
Proceeds from stock issuance  2.9   2.9   2.6 
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans  1.3   6.8   - 
Treasury stock acquired  (44.2)  (115.3)  (36.9)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  135.6   (101.9)  (87.4)
Effect of Exchange Rate changes on Cash  1.9   (2.5)  (0.3)
Net Cash Flows  (140.3)  40.1   13.9 
Cash and Cash Equivalents            
At beginning of period  224.6   184.5   170.6 
At end of period $84.3  $224.6  $184.5 
             
Supplemental cash flow information:            
             
Cash paid for income taxes $52.1  $30.3  $87.3 
Cash paid for interest $6.6  $7.7  $7.7 
             
Non-cash financing activities:            
Treasury stock issued under stock compensation plans $21.0  $65.7  $38.3 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOMEINCOME
(Dollars inIn millions, except per share data)

  Years Ended September 30 
  2015  2014  2013 
Net Revenue         
Capital sales $1,604.5  $1,301.4  $1,308.3 
Rental revenue  383.7   384.7   407.9 
Total revenue  1,988.2   1,686.1   1,716.2 
             
Cost of Revenue            
Cost of goods sold  921.2   730.2   747.8 
Rental expenses  186.7   176.0   188.1 
Total cost of revenue  1,107.9   906.2   935.9 
             
Gross Profit  880.3   779.9   780.3 
             
Research and development expenses  91.8   71.9   70.2 
Selling and administrative expenses  664.2   548.3   549.5 
Special charges (Note 8)  41.2   37.1   5.7 
Operating Profit  83.1   122.6   154.9 
             
Interest expense  (18.4)  (9.8)  (9.5)
Investment income and other, net  0.4   2.4   (1.4)
             
Income Before Income Taxes  65.1   115.2   144.0 
             
Income tax expense (Note 9)  18.3   54.6   39.0 
             
Net Income  46.8   60.6   105.0 
             
Less:  Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  (0.9)  -   - 
             
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders $47.7  $60.6  $105.0 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders            
per Common Share - Basic $0.83  $1.05  $1.75 
Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders            
per Common Share - Diluted $0.82  $1.04  $1.74 
             
Dividends per Common Share $0.6325  $0.5950  $0.5250 
             
Average Common Shares Outstanding - Basic (thousands) (Note 10)  57,249   57,555   59,910 
             
Average Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted (thousands) (Note 10)  58,536   58,523   60,250 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

44

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In millions)

              Accumulated          
  Common Stock        Other  Common Stock    
  Shares     Additional  Retained  Comprehensive  in Treasury    
  Outstanding  Amount  Paid-in-Capital  Earnings  Income (Loss)  Shares  Amount  Total 
                         
                         
Balance at September 30, 2009  62,667,562  $4.4  $119.0  $1,105.2  $(59.9)  17,656,350  $(559.4) $609.3 
                                 
Comprehensive Income:                                
Net income  -   -   -   126.0   -   -   -   126.0 
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax                                
of $1.3 million  -   -   -   -   0.7   -   -   0.7 
Net change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale                                
securities, net of tax of ($0.1) million  -   -   -   -   0.2   -   -   0.2 
Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic                                
pension costs, net of tax of $0.1 million  -   -   -   -   (2.8)  -   -   (2.8)
Total comprehensive income  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   124.1 
Dividends  -   -   0.3   (26.1)  -   -   -   (25.8)
Treasury shares acquired  (1,092,469)  -   -   -   -   1,092,469   (36.9)  (36.9)
Stock awards and option exercises  1,211,790   -   (2.4)  -   -   (1,211,790)  38.3   35.9 
Impact of Joint Venture  -   -   2.4   (1.5)  -   -   -   0.9 
Balance at September 30, 2010  62,786,883   4.4   119.3   1,203.6   (61.8)  17,537,029   (558.0)  707.5 
                                 
Comprehensive Income:                                
Net income  -   -   -   133.5   -   -   -   133.5 
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax                                
of $0.5 million  -   -   -   -   (3.8)  -   -   (3.8)
Net change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale                                
securities, net of tax of $0.0 million  -   -   -   -   (0.2)  -   -   (0.2)
Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic                                
pension costs, net of tax of $8.9 million  -   -   -   -   (13.2)  -   -   (13.2)
Total comprehensive income  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   116.3 
Dividends  -   -   0.1   (27.1)  -   -   -   (27.0)
Treasury shares acquired  (3,145,899)  -   -   -   -   3,145,899   (115.3)  (115.3)
Stock awards and option exercises  2,045,388   -   (0.4)  -   -   (2,045,388)  65.7   65.3 
Impact of Joint Venture  -   -   (4.9)  (0.2)  -   -   -   (5.1)
Balance at September 30, 2011  61,686,372   4.4   114.1   1,309.8   (79.0)  18,637,540   (607.6)  741.7 
                                 
Comprehensive Income:                                
Net income  -   -   -   120.8   -   -   -   120.8 
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax                                
of $1.8 million  -   -   -   -   (1.5)  -   -   (1.5)
Net change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale                                
securities, net of tax of ($0.2) million  -   -   -   -   0.5   -   -   0.5 
Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic                                
pension costs, net of tax of ($1.6) million  -   -   -   -   2.0   -   -   2.0 
Total comprehensive income  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   121.8 
Dividends  -   -   0.2   (30.3)  -   -   -   (30.1)
Treasury shares acquired  (1,532,232)  -   -   -   -   1,532,232   (44.2)  (44.2)
Stock awards and option exercises  642,783   -   2.5   -   -   (642,783)  20.9   23.4 
Balance at September 30, 2012  60,796,923  $4.4  $116.8  $1,400.3  $(78.0)  19,526,989  $(630.9) $812.6 

  Years Ended September 30 
  2015  2014  2013 
          
Net Income $46.8  $60.6  $105.0 
             
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax:            
             
Available-for-sale securities and currency hedges  -   0.3   0.1 
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (58.6)  (29.6)  12.6 
Change in pension and postretirement defined benefit plans  (8.1)  (9.1)  29.6 
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax  (66.7)  (38.4)  42.3 
             
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)  (19.9)  22.2   147.3 
             
Less:  Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests  (0.9)  -   - 
             
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Shareholders $(19.0) $22.2  $147.3 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
4345

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share amounts)

  September 30 
  2015  2014 
ASSETS      
Current Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $192.8  $99.3 
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $26.0 in 2015 and $31.4 in 2014 (Note 1)  494.7   411.0 
Inventories (Note 1)  267.4   176.2 
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9)  77.0   40.9 
Other current assets  109.1   51.9 
Total current assets  1,141.0   779.3 
         
Property, plant, and equipment (Note 1)  976.4   849.6 
Less accumulated depreciation  (598.0)  (588.1)
Property, plant, and equipment, net  378.4   261.5 
         
Intangible assets:        
Goodwill (Notes 1, 2 and 3)  1,610.5   399.8 
Software and other, net (Notes 1 and 2)  1,247.7   261.1 
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9)  21.6   23.0 
Other assets  58.4   26.6 
Total Assets $4,457.6  $1,751.3 
         
LIABILITIES        
Current Liabilities        
Trade accounts payable $136.3  $112.7 
Short-term borrowings (Note 4)  58.0   126.9 
Accrued compensation  171.8   89.2 
Accrued product warranties (Note 1)  32.1   28.4 
Accrued rebates  33.7   7.1 
Other current liabilities  146.9   78.0 
Total current liabilities  578.8   442.3 
         
Long-term debt (Note 4)  2,175.2   364.1 
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits (Note 6)  118.8   76.9 
Deferred income taxes (Notes 1 and 9)  380.6   31.0 
Other long-term liabilities  47.3   30.5 
Total Liabilities  3,300.7   944.8 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13)        
         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Note 7)        
Capital Stock:        
Preferred stock - without par value:        
Authorized - 1,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding  -   - 
Common stock - without par value:        
Authorized - 199,000,000        
Issued - 88,457,634 shares in 2015 and 80,323,912 shares in 2014  4.4   4.4 
Additional paid-in-capital  562.0   134.1 
Retained earnings  1,509.9   1,499.8 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (Note 1)  (140.8)  (74.1)
Treasury stock, common shares at cost:  2015 - 23,291,738 and 2014 - 22,884,001  (788.6)  (757.7)
Total Shareholders' Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders  1,146.9   806.5 
Noncontrolling interests  10.0   - 
Total Shareholders' Equity  1,156.9   806.5 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $4,457.6  $1,751.3 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
46

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(In millions)

  Years Ended September 30 
  2015  2014  2013 
          
Operating Activities         
Net income $46.8  $60.6  $105.0 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation  73.6   65.4   71.2 
Amortization  10.5   12.2   17.9 
Acquisition-related intangible asset amortization  34.1   28.8   27.7 
Provision for deferred income taxes  (22.3)  3.9   (14.8)
Loss on disposal of property, equipment leased to others,            
intangible assets and impairments  0.5   7.2   1.5 
Pension settlement charge  9.6   -   - 
Stock compensation  25.0   18.0   13.5 
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans  (3.6)  0.3   (0.3)
Change in working capital excluding cash, current debt,            
 acquisitions and dispositions:            
Trade accounts receivable  (39.7)  17.1   30.8 
Inventories  11.0   9.1   8.4 
Other current assets  (7.7)  (2.6)  (6.5)
Trade accounts payable  0.7   7.0   0.1 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities  53.8   (12.5)  (0.2)
Other, net  21.5   (4.2)  8.9 
Net cash provided by operating activities  213.8   210.3   263.2 
Investing Activities            
Capital expenditures and purchases of intangible assets  (121.3)  (62.7)  (65.3)
Proceeds on sale of property and equipment leased to others  1.5   2.4   5.9 
Payment for acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired  (1,638.7)  (239.5)  - 
Refund on acquisition of businesses  -   4.6   0.8 
Other  2.1   0.7   - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,756.4)  (294.5)  (58.6)
Financing Activities            
Net change in short-term debt  (0.7)  (0.2)  - 
Borrowings on revolving credit facility  95.0   252.0   - 
Payments on revolving credit facility  (135.0)  (57.0)  (35.0)
Proceeds from long-term debt  2,225.0   0.8   - 
Payment of long-term debt  (401.6)  (11.4)  (10.1)
Payment of acquired debt  -   (26.8)  - 
Repurchase of registered debentures  (5.9)  -   - 
Debt issuance costs  (50.3)  -   - 
Purchase of noncontrolling interest of former joint venture  (1.9)  (1.3)  (1.6)
Payment of cash dividends  (37.1)  (34.2)  (31.2)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  12.1   11.5   7.6 
Proceeds from stock issuance  2.8   2.5   2.5 
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans  3.6   (0.3)  0.3 
Treasury stock acquired  (63.3)  (71.8)  (94.0)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  1,642.7   63.8   (161.5)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (6.6)  (7.7)  - 
Net Cash Flows  93.5   (28.1)  43.1 
Cash and Cash Equivalents            
At beginning of period  99.3   127.4   84.3 
At end of period $192.8  $99.3  $127.4 
             
Supplemental cash flow information:            
             
Cash paid for income taxes $49.1  $44.4  $68.1 
Cash paid for interest $6.3  $7.8  $7.5 
             
Non-cash investing and financing activities:            
Treasury stock issued under stock compensation plans $32.4  $20.6  $18.4 
Common stock issued for acquisition of businesses $416.3  $-  $- 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

47

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In millions, except share amounts)

              Accumulated        Total Equity       
  Common Stock        Other  Common Stock  Attributable to       
  Shares     Additional  Retained  Comprehensive  in Treasury  Common  Noncontrolling    
  Outstanding  Amount  Paid-in-Capital  Earnings  Income (Loss)  Shares  Amount  Shareholders  Interests  Total 
                               
                               
Balance at September 30, 2012  60,796,923  $4.4  $116.8  $1,400.3  $(78.0)  19,526,989  $(630.9) $812.6  $-  $812.6 
                                         
Net income  -   -   -   105.0   -   -   -   105.0   -   105.0 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of ($18.1)  -   -   -   -   42.3   -   -   42.3   -   42.3 
Dividends  -   -   0.3   (31.5)  -   -   -   (31.2)  -   (31.2)
Treasury shares acquired  (2,844,765)  -   -   -   -   2,844,765   (94.0)  (94.0)  -   (94.0)
Stock awards and option exercises  571,234   -   5.6   -   -   (571,234)  18.4   24.0   -   24.0 
Balance at September 30, 2013  58,523,392   4.4   122.7   1,473.8   (35.7)  21,800,520   (706.5)  858.7       858.7 
                                         
Net income  -   -   -   60.6   -   -   -   60.6   -   60.6 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $4.9  -   -   -   -   (38.4)  -   -   (38.4)  -   (38.4)
Dividends  -   -   0.4   (34.6)  -   -   -   (34.2)  -   (34.2)
Treasury shares acquired  (1,709,523)  -   -   -   -   1,709,523   (71.8)  (71.8)  -   (71.8)
Stock awards and option exercises  626,042   -   11.0   -   -   (626,042)  20.6   31.6   -   31.6 
Balance at September 30, 2014  57,439,911   4.4   134.1   1,499.8   (74.1)  22,884,001   (757.7)  806.5       806.5 
                                         
Net income  -   -   -   47.7   -   -   -   47.7   (0.9)  46.8 
Consolidation of noncontrolling interest  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   10.9   10.9 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $5.1  -   -   -   -   (66.7)  -   -   (66.7)  -   (66.7)
Dividends  -   -   0.5   (37.6)  -   -   -   (37.1)  -   (37.1)
Issuance of common stock  8,133,722   -   416.3   -   -   -   -   416.3   -   416.3 
Treasury shares acquired  (1,373,321)  -   -   -   -   1,373,321   (63.3)  (63.3)  -   (63.3)
Stock awards and option exercises  965,584   -   11.1   -   -   (965,584)  32.4   43.5   -   43.5 
Balance at September 30, 2015  65,165,896  $4.4  $562.0  $1,509.9  $(140.8)  23,291,738  $(788.6) $1,146.9  $10.0  $1,156.9 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

48

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions except per share data)

Note 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (the “Company,” “Hill-Rom,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) (formerly known as Hillenbrand Industries, Inc.) was incorporated on August 7, 1969 in the State of Indiana and is headquartered in Batesville, Indiana.Chicago, Illinois. We are a leading worldwide manufacturer and provider ofglobal medical technologies and related services for the health care industry, including patient support systems, safe mobility and handling solutions, non-invasive therapeutic products for a variety of acute and chronic medical conditions, medical equipment rentals, surgical products and information technology solutions. Our comprehensive product and service offerings are used bycompany with more than 10,000 employees worldwide. We partner with health care providers across the healthin more than 100 countries by focusing on patient care continuumsolutions that improve clinical and aroundeconomic outcomes in five core areas: Advancing Mobility, Wound Care and Prevention, Clinical Workflow, Surgical Safety and Efficiency, and Respiratory Health. Around the world, in hospitals, extended care facilitiesHill-Rom's people, products, and home care settings, to enhance the safetyprograms work towards one mission: Enhancing outcomes for patients and quality of patient care.  In February 2012, we acquired Völker, a German manufacturer and distributor of patient support surfaces.  In July 2012, we acquired Aspen Surgical, a U.S.-based manufacturer of surgical products including the Bard-Parker® line of blades and scalpels.their caregivers.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Hill-Rom and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All subsidiaries are wholly-owned as of September 30, 2012.  During the first quarter of our fiscal 2011,In addition, we acquired the remaining 40 percent noncontrollingalso consolidate variable interest inentities (VIEs) where Hill-Rom is deemed to have a former joint venture (Note 2).  controlling financial interest. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.consolidation, including the intercompany transactions with consolidated VIEs. Where our ownership interest is less than 100 percent, the noncontrolling interests are reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Examples of such estimates include our accounts receivable reserves (Note 1), accrued warranties (Note 1), the impairment of intangibles and goodwill (Note 3), investments (Note 5), income taxes (Note(Notes 1 and 9) and commitments and contingencies (Note 13), among others.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider investments in marketable securities and other highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Investments which have no stated maturity are also considered cash equivalents. All of our marketable securities may be freely traded.

Investment Securities

At September 30, 2012, investment securities consisted primarily of AAA rated student loan auction rate securities (“ARS”).  These securities are generally insured through the U.S. government’s Federal Family Education Loan Program, to the extent the borrowers meet certain prescribed criteria in their underlying lending practices.  These securities are classified as available-for-sale and changes in their fair value are recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (“AOCL”).

We also previously held ARS with UBS Financial Services (“UBS”).  During the first quarter of 2009, we entered into an enforceable, non-transferable right (the “Put”) with UBS, which allowed us to exercise this Put at anytime during the period of June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, UBS redeemed $14.1 million of our ARS plus interest. On June 30, 2010, we successfully exercised our rights under this Put for all remaining ARS held with UBS and received cash proceeds of $12.0 million, including accrued interest, on July 1, 2010.
44

We regularly evaluate all investments classified as available-for-sale for possible impairment based on current economic conditions, credit loss experience and other criteria. The evaluation of investments for impairment requires significant judgments to be made including (i) the identification of potentially impaired securities; (ii) the determination of their estimated fair value; (iii) the assessment of whether any decline in estimated fair value is other-than-temporary; and (iv) the likelihood of selling before recovery. If there is a decline in a security’s net realizable value that is other-than-temporary and we are not likely to sell before recovery, the decline is separated into the amount of impairment related to credit loss and the amount of impairment related to all other factors.  The decline related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings, while the decline related to all other factors is recognized in AOCL.
See Note 5 for further details on our fair value measurements.

Trade Accounts Receivable

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest, unless the transaction is an installment sale with payment terms exceeding one year. Reserves for uncollectible accounts represent our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses and collection risk in our existing accounts receivable. We determine such reserves based on historical write-off experience by industry and reimbursement platform. Receivables are generally reviewed on a pooled basis based on historical collection experience for each reimbursement and receivable type. Receivables for capital sales transactions are also reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged against the allowance when we believe it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. We do not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to our customers. If circumstances change, such as higher than expected claims denials, payment defaults, changes in our business composition or processes, adverse changes in general economic conditions, unfavorable impacts of austerity measures initiated by some governmental authorities, instability or disruption of credit markets, or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s or payor’spayer’s ability to meet its obligations, our estimates of the realizability of trade receivables could be reduced by a material amount.

Within rental revenues,revenue, the domestic third-party payors’payers’ reimbursement process requires extensive documentation, which has had the effect of slowing both the billing and cash collection cycles relative to the rest of the business, and therefore, increasing total accounts receivable. Because of the extensive documentation required and the requirement to settle a claim with the primary payorpayer prior to billing the secondary and/or patient portion of the claim, the collection period for a claim in a portion of our business may, in some cases, be extended.

49

We generally hold our trade accounts receivable until they are paid. Certain long-term receivables are occasionally sold to third parties; however, any recognized gain or loss on such sales has historically not been material.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Inventory costs are determined by the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method for approximately 4421 and 6029 percent of our inventories at September 30, 20122015 and 2011.2014. Costs for other inventories have been determined principally by the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Inventories consist of the following:

 September 30  September 30 
 2012  2011  2015  2014 
            
Finished products $71.8  $55.6  $133.2  $93.5 
Work in process  6.4   4.2   46.1   17.3 
Raw materials  48.7   35.8   88.1   65.4 
Total $126.9  $95.6  $267.4  $176.2 

If the FIFO method of inventory accounting, which approximates current cost, had been used for all inventories, they would have been approximately $3.1$3.2 million and $2.2$4.0 million higher than reported at September 30, 20122015 and 2011.2014.

45

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the assets using principally the straight-line method. Ranges of estimated useful lives are as follows:


  Useful Life
Land improvements 6 - 15 years
Buildings and building equipment 10 - 40 years
Machinery and equipment 3 - 10 years
Equipment leased to others 2 -10 years

When property, plant and equipment is retired from service or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related amount of depreciation or amortization are eliminated from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts. The difference, if any, between the net asset value and the proceeds on sale are charged or credited to income. Total depreciation expense for fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was $73.9$73.6 million, $74.3$65.4 million and $72.8$71.2 million. The major components of property and the related accumulated depreciation were as follows:

 September 30  September 30 
 2012  2011  2015  2014 
    Accumulated     Accumulated     Accumulated     Accumulated 
 Cost  Depreciation  Cost  Depreciation  Cost  Depreciation  Cost  Depreciation 
                        
Land and land improvements $16.1  $4.4  $12.2  $3.9  $23.3  $2.8  $19.4  $2.3 
Buildings and building equipment  142.6   85.8   115.3   79.0   196.2   90.3   158.3   88.6 
Machinery and equipment  276.3   187.6   269.0   205.3   369.5   226.5   321.3   213.7 
Equipment leased to others  399.9   307.0   423.1   308.6   387.4   278.4   350.6   283.5 
Total $834.9  $584.8  $819.6  $596.8  $976.4  $598.0  $849.6  $588.1 

50


Intangible Assets

Intangible assets are stated at cost and consist predominantly of goodwill, software, patents, acquired technology, trademarks, and trademarks.acquired customer relationship assets. With the exception of goodwill and certain trademarks, our intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods generally ranging from 3 to 20 years.

We assess the carrying value of goodwill and non-amortizable intangibles annually, during the third quarter of each fiscal year, or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate there may be impairment. Goodwill is allocated among the reporting units based on the relative fair value of those units.

The majority of our goodwill and many of our intangible assets are not deductible for income tax purposes. A summary of intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization and impairment losses follows:
  September 30 
  2012  2011 
     Amortization     Amortization 
  Cost  and Impairment  Cost  and Impairment 
             
Goodwill $808.0  $472.8  $560.0  $472.8 
Software  163.2   123.7   154.7   106.2 
Other  334.4   83.1   134.7   57.1 
Total $1,305.6  $679.6  $849.4  $636.1 

46

  September 30 
  2015  2014 
     Amortization     Amortization 
  Cost  and Impairment  Cost  and Impairment 
             
Goodwill $2,083.3  $472.8  $872.6  $472.8 
Software  181.7   139.2   170.5   146.6 
Patents and Trademarks  497.6   16.9   67.1   16.0 
Other  872.8   148.3   306.8   120.7 
Total $3,635.4  $777.2  $1,417.0  $756.1 

Amortization expense for fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was $37.8$44.6 million, $29.6$41.0 million and $26.9$45.6 million. As further discussed in Note 3, we have various indefinite-lived intangible assets representing trade names with a carrying value of $466.9 million at September 30, 2015 and $32.9 million at September 30, 2014. Amortization expense for all other intangibles is expected to approximate the following for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter:

  Amount 
2013 $45.9 
2014 $39.5 
2015 $34.7 
2016 $28.4 
2017 $20.8 
2018 and beyond $88.6 
  Amount 
2016 $92.9 
2017 $85.8 
2018 $81.6 
2019 $78.0 
2020 $74.4 
2021 and beyond $368.1 

Software consists mainly of capitalized costs associated with internal use software, including applicable costs associated with the implementation/upgrade of our Enterprise Resource Planning system.systems. In addition, software includes capitalized development costs for software products to be sold. The net book value of computer software costs, included within Intangibleintangible assets, was $39.5$42.5 million and $48.5$23.9 million at September 30, 20122015 and 2011.2014. Capitalized software costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from three to ten years. Software amortization expense approximated $20.7$9.8 million, $19.1$11.5 million and $17.5$17.8 million for fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, and is included in the total intangibles amortization presented earlier.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

·Level 1:  Financial instruments with unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities.
51

·Level 2:  Financial instruments with observable inputs other than those included in Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

·Level 3:  Financial instruments with unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Unobservable inputs shall be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include our own data.

We record cash and cash equivalents, as disclosed on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as Level 1 instruments and certain other investments and insignificant derivatives as either Level 2 or 3 instruments. Refer to Note 4 for disclosure of our debt instrument fair values.

Guarantees

We routinely grant limited warranties on our products with respect to defects in material and workmanship. The terms of these warranties are generally one year, however, certain components and products have substantially longer warranty periods. We recognize a reserve with respect to these obligations at the time of product sale, with subsequent warranty claims recorded directly against the reserve. The amount of the warranty reserve is determined based on historical trend experience for the covered products. For more significant warranty-related matters which might require a broad-based correction, separate reserves are established when such events are identified and the cost of correction can be reasonably estimated.  During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we initiated a field corrective action on one of our med-surg product lines related to an intermittent circuit board connection issue.  We recognized a charge of $16.0 million for this action.  This voluntary action does not limit the manufacture, sale or ongoing use of these beds.

A reconciliation of changes in our warranty reserve is as follows:

 2012  2011  2010  2015  2014  2013 
                  
Balance at October 1 $17.8  $15.8  $17.1  $28.4  $38.1  $42.2 
Provision for warranties during the period  31.8   17.0   16.0   14.7   9.8   29.2 
Warranty reserves acquired  9.7   -   -   7.1   3.0   (2.6)
Warranty claims incurred during the period  (17.1)  (15.0)  (17.3)  (18.1)  (22.5)  (30.7)
Balance at September 30 $42.2  $17.8  $15.8  $32.1  $28.4  $38.1 

In the normal course of business we enter into various other guarantees and indemnities in our relationships with suppliers, service providers, customers, business partners and others. Examples of these arrangements would include guarantees of product performance, indemnifications to service providers and indemnifications of our actions to business partners. These guarantees and indemnifications have not historically nor do we expect them to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations, although indemnifications associated with our actions generally have no dollar limitations.

In conjunction with our acquisition and divestiture activities, we have entered into select guarantees and indemnifications of performance with respect to the fulfillment of our commitments under applicable purchase and sale agreements. The arrangements generally indemnify the buyer or seller for damages associated with breach of contract, inaccuracies in representations and warranties surviving the closing date and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments retained under the applicable contract. With respect to sale transactions, we also routinely enter into non-competition agreements for varying periods of time. Guarantees and indemnifications with respect to acquisition and divestiture activities, if triggered, could have a materially adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Accrued Rebates

We provide rebates and sales incentives to certain customer groups and distributors. Provisions for rebates are recorded as a reduction in net revenue when revenue is recognized. In some cases, rebates may be payable directly to the customer or distributor. We also have arrangements where we provide rebates to certain distributors that sell to end-user customers at prices determined under a contract between us and the end-user customer.

 
4752

Employee Benefits Change

During the second quarter of Contents
fiscal 2014, we implemented a new paid time off policy as part of our employee benefits programs, replacing certain previously existing vacation and sick time policies. In conjunction with these changes in policies, the vesting provisions with respect to the accumulation of paid time off were delayed resulting in the recognition and utilization of paid time off in the same benefits year. As a result of this change, significant portions of our existing accrued vacation balance were no longer necessary and we reversed $12.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and an additional $1.2 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 to reflect the change in vesting provisions. All accounting with respect to this change in policy is complete.

Retirement Plans

We sponsor retirement and postretirement plans covering select employees. Expense recognized in relation to these defined benefit retirement plans and the postretirement health care planplans in the U.S. is based upon actuarial valuations and inherent in those valuations are key assumptions including discount rates, and where applicable, expected returns on assets, projected future salary rates and projected health care cost trends. The discount rates used in the valuation of our defined benefit pension and postretirement plans are evaluated annually based on current market conditions. In setting these rates we utilize long-term bond indices and yield curves as a preliminary indication of interest rate movements, and then make adjustments to the respective indices to reflect differences in the terms of the bonds covered under the indices in comparison to the projected outflow of our obligations. Our overall expected long-term rate of return on pension assets is based on historical and expected future returns, which are inflation adjusted and weighted for the expected return for each component of the investment portfolio. Our rate of assumed compensation increase is also based on our specific historical trends of wage adjustments.

We account for our defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans by recognizing the funded status of a benefit plan in the statement of financial position. We also recognize in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) certain gains and losses that arose during the period. See Note 6 for key assumptions and further discussion related to our pension and postretirement plans.

Environmental Liabilities

Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to future revenue generation, are expensed. A reserve is established when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These reserves are determined without consideration of possible loss recoveries from third parties.

Specific costs included in environmental expense and reserves include site assessment, development of a remediation plan, clean-up costs, post-remediation expenditures, monitoring, fines, penalties and legal fees. Reserve amounts represent the expected undiscounted future cash outflows associated with such plans and actions.

Self Insurance

We are generally self-insured up to certain limits for product/also involved in other possible claims, including product and general liability, workers’ compensation, auto liability and professional liability insurance programs.  These policiesemployment related matters. Such claims in the United States have deductibles and self-insuredself-insured retentions ranging from $150$25 thousand to $1.5$1.0 million per occurrence or per claim, depending upon the type of coverage and policy period. International deductibles and self-insured retentions are lower. We are also generally self-insured up to certain stop-limitsstop-loss limits for certain employee health benefits, including medical, drug and dental. Our policy is to estimate reserves based upon a number of factors including known claims, estimated incurred but not reported claims and outside actuarial analysis, which are based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Such estimated reserves are classified as Other Current Liabilities and Other Long-Term Liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Treasury Stock

Treasury stock consists of our common shares that have been issued, but subsequently reacquired. We account for treasury stock purchases under the cost method. When these shares are reissued, we use an average-cost method to determine cost. Proceeds in excess of cost are credited to additional paid-in capital.

53


Revenue Recognition — Sales and Rentals

Net revenues reflectrevenue reflects gross revenuesrevenue less sales discounts and allowances and customer returns for product sales and rental revenue reserves. Revenue is evaluated under the following criteria and recognized when each is met:

Evidence of an arrangement: An agreement with the customer reflecting the terms and conditions to deliver products or services serves as evidence of an arrangement.

Delivery: For products, delivery is considered to occur upon receipt by the customer and the transfer of title and risk of loss.loss per the respective sales terms. For rental services, delivery is considered to occur when the services are rendered.

Fixed or determinable price: The sales price is considered fixed or determinable if it is not subject to refund or measurable adjustment.

Collection is deemed probable: At or prior to the time of a transaction, credit reviews of each customer are performed to determine the creditworthiness of the customer. Collection is deemed probable if the customer is expected to be able to pay amounts under the arrangement as those amounts become due. If collection is not probable, revenue is recognized when collection becomes probable, generally upon cash collection.
48


As a general interpretation of the above guidelines, revenuesrevenue for health care and surgical products areis generally recognized upon delivery of the products to the customer and their assumption of risk of loss and other risks and rewards of ownership.ownership by the customer. Local business customs and non-standard sales terms can sometimes result in deviations to this normal practice in certain instances; however, in no case is revenue recognized prior to the transfer of risk of loss and rewards of ownership.

For non-invasive therapy products and medical equipment management services, the majority of product offerings are rental products for which revenues arerevenue is recognized consistent with the rendering of the service and use of products. For The Vest®Vest® product, revenue is generally recognized at the time of receipt of authorization for billing from the applicable paying entity as this serves as evidence of the arrangement and sets a fixed or determinable price.

For health care products and services aimed at improving operational efficiency and asset utilization,in the information technology space, various revenue recognition techniques are used, depending on the offering. Arrangements to provide services, routinely under separately sold service and maintenance contracts, result in the deferral of revenuesrevenue until specified services are performed. Service contract revenue is generally recognized ratably over the contract period, if applicable, or as services are rendered. Product-related goods are generally recognized upon delivery to the customer.

Revenues areRevenue is presented in the Statements of Consolidated Income net of certain discounts, GPO fees, and sales adjustments. For product sales, we record reserves resulting in a reduction of revenue for contractual discounts, as well as price concessions and product returns. Likewise, rental revenue reserves, reflecting contractual and other routine billing adjustments, are recorded as a reduction of revenues.revenue. Reserves for revenue are estimated based upon historical rates for revenue adjustments.

Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Units

Taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are directly imposed on a revenue producing transaction between us and our customers, including but not limited to sales taxes, use taxes, and value added taxes, are accounted for on a net (excluded from revenuesrevenue and costs)cost) basis.

Cost of RevenuesRevenue

Cost of goods sold for capitalproduct sales consists primarily of purchased material costs, fixed manufacturing expense, variable direct labor, overhead costs and costs associated with the distribution and delivery of products to our customers. Rental expenses consist of costs associated directly with rental revenue, including depreciation, maintenance, logistics and service center facility and personnel costs.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Costs were $66.9$91.8 million, $63.8$71.9 million and $58.3$70.2 million for fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013.

54

In addition, certain costs for software development technology costsheld for sale are capitalized as intangibles and are amortized over a period of three to five years once the software is ready for its intended use. The amount capitalized during fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was approximately $2.3$2.6 million, $2.1$2.6 million and $4.8$2.4 million.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Costs were $4.4$6.8 million, $4.0$7.3 million and $4.3$7.4 million for fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013.

Comprehensive Income

We include the net-of-tax effect of unrealized gains or losses on our available-for-sale securities, foreign currency translation adjustments and pension or other defined benefit postretirement plans’ actuarial gains or losses and prior service costs or credits in comprehensive income.

49

The composition of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) is as follows:
  September 30 
  2012  2011  2010 
          
Available-for-sale securities and currency hedges, net of tax of         
$0.2, $0.4 and $0.4, respectively $(0.4) $(0.9) $(0.7)
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax of $0.1, ($1.7)            
 and ($2.2), respectively  (17.2)  (15.7)  (11.9)
Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic pension            
and postretirement healthcare costs, net of tax of $36.6, $38.2            
and $29.3, respectively  (60.4)  (62.4)  (49.2)
Total $(78.0) $(79.0) $(61.8)
See Note 5 for further details.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of foreign operations is generally the local currency in the country of domicile. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are primarily translated into U.S. dollars at year-end rates of exchange and the income statements are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Adjustments resulting from translation of the financial statements of foreign operations into U.S. dollars are excluded from the determination of net income, but included as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in our results of operations and are not material.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation under fair value provisions. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. In order to determine the fair value of stock options and other performance-based stock awards on the date of grant, we utilize a Binomial model. Inherent in this model are assumptions related to a volatility factor, expected life, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield and expected forfeitures. The risk-free interest rate is based on factual data derived from public sources. The volatility factor, expected life, dividend yield and expected forfeiture assumptions require judgment utilizing historical information, peer data and future expectations. Deferred stock (also known as restricted stock units (“RSUs”)) is measured based on the fair market price of our common stock on the date of grant, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, multiplied by the number of units granted. See Note 7 for further details.

Income Taxes

The Company and our eligible domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. income tax return. Foreign operations file income tax returns in a number of jurisdictions. Deferred income taxes are computed using an asset and liability approach to reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and the corresponding income tax amounts. We have a variety of deferred tax assets in numerous tax jurisdictions. These deferred tax assets are subject to periodic assessment as to recoverability and ifrecoverability. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized, valuation allowances are recognized. In evaluating whether it is more likely than not that we would recover these deferred tax assets, future taxable income, the reversal of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies are considered.

We account for uncertain income tax positions using a threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The difference between the tax benefit recognized in the financial statements for an uncertain income tax position and the tax benefit claimed in the tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit. See Note 9 for further details.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity

We use derivative financial instruments to manage the economic impact of fluctuations in currency exchange and interest rates. Derivative financial instruments related to currency exchange rates include forward purchase and sale agreements which generally have terms no greater than 15 months. Additionally, interest rate swaps haveare sometimes been used to convert a portionsome or all of our long-term debt fromto either a fixed toor variable interest rates.rate.

 
5055

 
Derivative financial instruments are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in the Statement of Consolidated Income or Accumulated Otherthe Statement of Consolidated Comprehensive Income, (Loss), depending on whether a derivative is designated and considered effective as part of a hedge transaction, and if it is, the type of hedge transaction. Gains and losses on derivative instruments reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are subsequently included in the Statement of Consolidated Income in the periods in which earnings are affected by the hedged item. These activities have not had a material effect on our financial position or results of operations for the periods presented herein.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

On October 1, 2011, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (“FASB”) revised authoritative guidance on the annual goodwill impairment test to provide the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step test.  If, as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is determined it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required.  Otherwise, no further testing is required.  We applied this guidance effective with our fiscal 2012 annual goodwill impairment test which was performed in our third fiscal quarter.  See further discussion in Note 3.

On October 1, 2011, we adopted the FASB’s revised authoritative guidance on business combinations which requires revenues and earnings of the combined entity be disclosed as if the business combination occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period.  This guidance also requires additional disclosures about adjustments included in the reported proforma revenues and earnings.  This guidance applies prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after October 1, 2011.  See further discussion in Note 2.

In June 2011,May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The standard’s core principle, as further amended, is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amendmentamount that reflects the consideration to which the authoritative guidance on comprehensive income.  The amendment eliminatescompany expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the option to presentFASB issued ASU 2015-14 which delayed the components of other comprehensive income as parteffective date of the statementnew revenue guidance by one year. As a result, the provisions of changes in stockholders' equity or include the components in the Notes of our Consolidated Financial Statements and instead requires the presentation of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements.  The amendmentASU 2014-09 will be effective for ourus in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, ending December 31, 2012.  The2018. Early adoption is permitted as of the original effective date, but not earlier. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements, but will require us to change our current presentation and include comprehensive income on the face of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued a standard regarding disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities.  The standard requires entities to disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the Balance Sheet or those instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting agreement. The standard will be effective beginning October 1, 2013.  We do not expect this to have a material impactASU on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In July 2012,April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The amendments in this ASU require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements.” This standard permits an amendmententity to defer and present debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements as an asset and to subsequently amortize the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement. These new standards do not affect the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. As permitted, the Company has elected to early-adopt these standards in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. This guidance is effective on a retrospective basis, as a change in accounting principle. The impact of the early adoption on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2014 was a decrease to other assets and a decrease to long-term debt of $0.8 million.

In September 2015, the Company adopted ASU 2015-16, "Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments." This update eliminates the need to retrospectively adjust prior period information in the financial statements for acquisition adjustments to goodwill during the measurement period. The impact of ASU 2015-16 will be dependent on any future measurement period adjustments for acquisitions.

In February 2013, an accounting standards update was issued that amends the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). This standard does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income (loss) in the financial statements. However, the guidance requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, either on the face of the financial statement where net income is presented or in the notes to the authoritative guidance onfinancial statements. The company adopted this standard in fiscal 2014, and the annual impairment test on indefinite-lived intangible assets.  The amendment providesdisclosures of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss are included in Note 5.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the current quantitative test.  If, as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is determined it is more likely than notFASB or other standards-setting bodies that the fair value of an intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required.  Otherwise, no further testing is required.  The amendment will be effective beginning October 1, 2013, however early adoption is permitted.  We will consider applying this guidance in connection with future annual intangible impairment tests.  We do not expect thisrequire adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statementsthe Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

NOTE 2. ACQUISITIONS

Aspen Surgical
Welch Allyn

On July 23, 2012,September 8, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Welch Allyn Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Welch Allyn”) for a consideration of $1,687.3 million in cash ($1,633.6 million, net of cash acquired) and 8,133,722 shares of Hill-Rom common stock for a total combined purchase agreement with the stockholdersprice of approximately $2.1 billion. Welch Allyn is a leading manufacturer of medical diagnostic equipment and optionholders of Aspen Surgical Products Holding, Inc. (“Aspen Surgical”) to acquire the entire equity interest in Aspen Surgical.  Aspen Surgical providesoffers a diversified portfolio of well-established surgical consumabledevices that assess, diagnose, treat, and specialty medical products, focused on improving the safety of patients and health care professionals. The product lines include market leading Bard-Parker® conventional and safety scalpels and blades, Colby fluid collection products, Richard-Allan™ specialty needles,manage a wide variety of other operating room disposablesillnesses and instrument care products as well as wound care dressings. The acquisition of Aspen Surgical further develops our surgical business, adding a portfolio of consumable products and expanding our position in the North American and European surgical markets.  diseases.

 
5156

 
The purchase pricecash portion of the consideration is preliminary and subject to adjustment for Aspen Surgical was $402.2 million ($399.8 million net of cash acquired).  We funded the transaction with a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under the revolving credit facility.  The results of Aspen Surgical are includedvarious true-up provisions as described in the Consolidated Financial Statements sinceterms of the datemerger agreement. The transaction was funded with new borrowings, including $1.8 billion in term loans and $425.0 million of acquisition.  Our reported revenues included $23.0 millionsenior notes issued in a private placement debt offering. Funds from this new financing were also used to retire pre-existing debt. Refer to Note 4 for the year ended September 30, 2012 related to Aspen Surgical products and the impact to net income was not significant.additional information regarding our debt obligations.

The following summarizes the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition.

  Amount 
Inventory $25.9 
Other current assets  19.7 
Property, plant, and equipment  24.0 
Goodwill  215.3 
Trade name (Indefinite Lived)  29.0 
Trade name (15-year weighted-average useful life)  4.6 
Customer relationships (13-year weighted-average useful life)  126.0 
Technology (10-year weighted-average useful life)  9.1 
Other noncurrent assets  1.6 
Current liabilities  (9.6)
Deferred tax liability  (43.4)
   Total purchase price $402.2 

The calculation of fair value of the assets and liabilities is These results are preliminary and subject to adjustment based on finalization ofnormal true-up provisions in the closing balance sheetpurchase agreement and other contractual conditions under the terms of the purchase agreement.fair value adjustments.

  Amount 
    
Trade receivables $63.2 
Inventory  110.5 
Other current assets  52.7 
Current deferred income taxes  27.3 
Property, plant, and equipment  93.2 
Goodwill  1,203.5 
Trade name (indefinite life)  434.0 
Customer relationships (12-year useful life)  516.8 
Developed technology (7-year weighted average useful life)  54.0 
Other intangibles  19.9 
Other noncurrent assets  30.6 
Current liabilities  (161.5)
Noncurrent deferred income taxes  (368.7)
Other noncurrent liabilities  (25.6)
  Total purchase price, net of cash acquired $2,049.9 
     
Fair value of common stock issued $416.3 
Cash payment, net of cash acquired  1,633.6 
  Total consideration $2,049.9 

Goodwill was allocated to our Surgical and Respiratory Care segment andfrom the Welch Allyn acquisition, which is not deductible for tax purposes.purposes, is primarily due to enhanced customer relevance and a stronger competitive position resulting from the business combination, including a complementary commercial position, product portfolio, and enhanced synergies. As stated in Note 11, Welch Allyn is reported as a reconciling item in our segment disclosures for the year ended September 30, 2015. Accordingly, the goodwill from the Welch Allyn acquisition has not yet been allocated to a reportable segment.

Our total revenuesrevenue on an unaudited proformapro forma basis, as if the Aspen SurgicalWelch Allyn acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of our 20112014 fiscal year, would have been higher by approximately $92.3$638 million and $118.1$677 million for the years ended September 30, 20122015 and 2011.  Net2014, respectively. On the same unaudited pro forma basis, our net income on an unaudited proforma basis, would have been higherlower by approximately $5.7$59 million and $11.1$61 million for the years ended September 30, 20122015 and 20112014, respectively. The pro forma net income in each year has been adversely impacted by significant costs related to the transaction including deal costs, financing costs, restructuring costs incurred in relation to our synergy initiatives, costs associated with triggering the change-in-control provisions of certain equity-based compensation programs at Welch Allyn, and earnings per diluted share would have been higher by $0.09 and $0.17 forpurchase price accounting, including the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.  nonrecurring effects of the inventory step-up. These results are not indicative of expected future performance.
The unaudited pro forma results are based on the Company’s historical financial statements and those of the Aspen SurgicalWelch Allyn business and do not necessarily indicate the results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the comparable period presented and are not indicative of the results of operations in future periods.

Völker
Trumpf Medical

On February 13, 2012,August 1, 2014, we acquiredcompleted the Germany-based Völker groupacquisition of Trumpf Medical (“Völker”Trumpf”).  Völker is and funded the transaction with a leading manufacturercombination of long-term carecash on hand and acute care bed frames, surfacesborrowings. Trumpf Medical provides a portfolio of well-established operating room (OR) infrastructure products such as surgical tables, surgical lighting, and furniture in Europesupply units and around the world.  This transaction is expected to strengthen the Company’s channels andexpands our product offerings in Europe, and furthers our objective of completing strategically relevant and value-enhancing acquisitions.  The complementary Völker products will also further develop the Company’s global portfolio, accelerate international expansion, and leverage existing sales channels and customer relationships.  surgical suite. 

The purchase price for Völker was $80.7$232.9 million ($77.0226.6 million net of cash acquired), which was reduced to $76.7 million, resulting from a $4.0 million purchase price adjustment, that, as of September 30, 2012, was recorded as a receivable from the seller.. The results of VölkerTrumpf are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of acquisition. Our reported revenuesrevenue included $60.8$39.0 million for the year ended September 30, 20122014 related to VölkerTrumpf products and the impact to net income was not significant.

 
5257


During the fourth quarter of 2012, we made certain adjustments to the opening balance sheet as of the acquisition date as we finalized the purchase price with the seller.  The following summarizes the revised fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition.
  Amount 
Goodwill $34.8 
Trade name (7-year useful life)  12.3 
Customer relationships (8-year weighted average useful life)  17.5 
Net assets acquired  21.9 
Deferred tax liability  (9.8)
  Total purchase price $76.7 
These results are now considered final.

The calculation of fair value of the assets and liabilities is preliminary and subject to adjustment based on finalization of contractual conditions under the terms of the purchase agreement.
  Amount 
    
Trade receivables $67.6 
Inventory  63.6 
Other current assets  23.4 
Property, plant, and equipment  42.1 
Goodwill  66.0 
Trade name (5-year useful life)  6.7 
Customer relationships (10-year weighted average useful life)  15.8 
Developed technology (8-year weighted average useful life)  17.8 
Other intangibles  4.8 
Other noncurrent assets  0.7 
Deferred tax asset  12.9 
Current liabilities  (74.4)
Long term debt  (6.0)
Noncurrent liabilities  (8.1)
  Total purchase price $232.9 

Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and was allocated entirely to our InternationalSurgical and Respiratory Care segment. The goodwill related to the acquired German operations will be tax deductible while the remaining goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes.

Our total revenuesrevenue on an unaudited proformapro forma basis, as if the VölkerTrumpf acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of our 20112013 fiscal year, would have been higher by approximately $49.9$218 million and $117.0$235 million for the years ended September 30, 20122014 and 2011.2013. The impact to net income on an unaudited proforma basis would not have been significant to our financial results for those years.

Liko Distributor Acquisition

On September 8, 2011, we acquired the distribution companies for our patient mobility products in France and Switzerland (collectively referred to as “Liko Distributors”).  The acquisition represents another step in our strategy for international expansion, leveraging and increasing our direct channel presence, especially in key European markets.  The purchase price for the Liko Distributors was $22.5 million ($15.5 million net of cash acquired).

The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:
  Amount 
Goodwill $6.4 
Customer relationships (5-year useful life)  7.9 
Non-Compete agreements (2-year useful life)  0.6 
Net assets acquired  10.3 
Deferred tax liabilities  (2.7)
  Total purchase price $22.5 

Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and was allocated entirely to our International segment.

If the Liko Distributors had been acquired at the beginning of our 2011 fiscal year, the impact to revenues and net income on an unaudited pro forma basis would not have been significant to our financial results in anyfor those years. The unaudited pro forma results are based on the Company’s historical financial statements and those of the periods presented.Trumpf business and do not necessarily indicate the results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the comparable period presented and are not indicative of the results of operations in future periods.

Encompass Joint VentureVirtus, Inc.

On November 9, 2009,March 31, 2014 we entered intocompleted a joint venturestock purchase agreement with Encompass Group, LLCthe stockholders of Virtus, Inc. (“Encompass Group”Virtus”), a leader in health care textiles and therapeutic and prevention surfaces, to form Encompass TSS, LLC (“Encompass”).  This joint venture included contributed former assets of Encompass Therapeutic Support Systems (“ETSS”), a division of Encompass Group and was 60 percent owned by us and 40 percent owned by Encompass Group.  Encompass Group, through its ETSS business unit, traditionally focused on providing surface replacement systems.  For our 60 percent ownershipacquire the entire equity interest in the Encompass JV we paid $7.5 million to Encompass Group, contributed cashVirtus: a supplier of finished surfaces and entered into licensecomponents for our bed and distribution agreements with Encompass JV.stretcher products. The acquisition of Virtus insources a component of our supply chain.

53

cash acquired). We funded the transaction primarily with borrowings. The results of Virtus are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of acquisition.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of formation.the acquisition. During the third quarter of fiscal 2014, the remaining provisions of the stock purchase agreement were settled and the purchase price is now final.
  Amount 
Inventory $2.6 
Other current assets  5.4 
Property, plant, and equipment  1.9 
Goodwill  9.4 
Current liabilities  (1.6)
Deferred tax liability  (0.1)
   Total purchase price $17.6 

  Amount 
Goodwill $8.0 
Trade Name (7-year useful life)  1.5 
Customer relationships  (7-year useful life)  7.7 
Technology (5-year useful life)  2.4 
Net liabilities assumed  (0.7)
Noncontrolling interest  (7.5)
Additional paid-in-capital  (3.9)
  Total purchase price $7.5 

The Encompass JV agreements contained both a put option for Encompass Group and a call option for us, requiring or allowing us to purchase the remaining 40 percent interest based on predetermined earnings multiples.  Changes to the value of the put were accreted to noncontrolling interest in our Consolidated Balance Sheet with the offset being recorded as a component of retained earnings.

The goodwill of $8.0 million arising from the Encompass JV consisted largely of the synergies created from combining ETSS’s focus on customer replacement surfaces with our platform brands.  The goodwillGoodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and was allocated entirely to both our North America segment.and International segments.

On November
58

The impact to our total revenue and net income on an unaudited proforma basis, as if the Virtus acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of our 2013 fiscal year, would not have been significant for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010, we exercised our call option2014 and purchased the remaining 40 percent of Encompass for $10.6 million, plus a variable earn-out with a minimum of $1.2 million and a maximum of $1.6 million per year over five years.  2013.  

Other

We have used cash on hand for other business acquisitions and equity investments which we do not consider individually material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations. These included one equity investment in which the investee was determined to be a totalVIE and Hill-Rom was determined to have a controlling financial interest, resulting in consolidation of $4.6 million accrued in other currentthe investee. The portion of this investee’s assets, liabilities, and other long-term liabilities onoperating results which are not attributable to Hill-Rom’s equity investment are recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheet atFinancial Statements as attributable to noncontrolling interests.

NOTE 3. GOODWILL AND INDEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following summarizes goodwill activity by reportable segment:

  North America  
Surgical and
Respiratory Care
  International  Welch Allyn  Total 
                
Balances at September 30, 2013:               
Goodwill $383.0  $279.0  $153.6  $-  $815.6 
Accumulated impairment losses  (358.1)  -   (114.7)  -   (472.8)
Goodwill, net at September 30, 2013  24.9   279.0   38.9   -   342.8 
                     
Changes in Goodwill during the period:                    
Goodwill related to acquisitions  7.6   57.3   (2.8)  -   62.1 
Currency translation effect  -   (2.8)  (2.3)  -   (5.1)
                     
Balances at September 30, 2014:                    
Goodwill  390.6   333.5   148.5   -   872.6 
Accumulated impairment losses  (358.1)  -   (114.7)  -   (472.8)
Goodwill, net at September 30, 2014  32.5   333.5   33.8   -   399.8 
                     
Changes in Goodwill during the period:                    
Goodwill related to acquisitions  -   22.1   -   1,203.5   1,225.6 
Currency translation effect  -   (11.8)  (3.1)  -   (14.9)
                     
Balances at September 30, 2015:                    
Goodwill  390.6   343.8   145.4   1,203.5   2,083.3 
Accumulated impairment losses  (358.1)  -   (114.7)  -   (472.8)
Goodwill, net at September 30, 2015 $32.5  $343.8  $30.7  $1,203.5  $1,610.5 

We acquired Welch Allyn on September 30, 20128, 2015 and Trumpf on August 1, 2014. All goodwill associated with the Welch Allyn acquisition is presented as a reconciling item in the table above, as it has not yet been assigned to a reportable segment. All goodwill related to the earn-out.

NOTE 3. IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES

We perform an impairment assessment onTrumpf acquisition was assigned to the Surgical and Respiratory Care segment. During fiscal 2015, we recorded adjustments to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles on an annual basis during our third fiscal quarter, or more often if events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment.  The assessmentsrelated to the Trumpf acquisition completed during the third quarter of 2012, 2011 and 2010 indicated that there was no impairment.
During the secondfourth quarter of fiscal 2012,2014. We also consolidated an investment made in fiscal 2015 that was determined to be a VIE in which we were required to perform an interim impairment test onhave a trade name, triggered by strategic changes in how the asset would be utilized on a go forward basis.controlling financial interest. The fair value of the trade name was calculated with assistance from a third party valuation firm andconsolidation resulted in a charge$12.1 million of $8.0 million, as disclosed ingoodwill being recorded within our Surgical and Respiratory Care segment. We acquired Virtus on March 31, 2014 and recorded goodwill of $9.4 million. This goodwill was allocated between our North America and International segments based on the expected benefits resulting from the acquisition. Refer to Note 8.  The relief from royalty approach was used by applying a royalty rate to future revenue projections and then a discount rate was applied.  All Hill-Rom-specific data and analytics, including estimates and assumptions, used in the valuation prepared by the third party valuation firm were either prepared or validated by us.  Management takes full responsibility2 for this data and the ultimate results of the valuation work.  The fair value measurement was classified as Level 3, as described in Note 5.additional information regarding these acquisitions.

As discussed in Note 11, we operate in three reportable business segments. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level, which is one level below a reportable business segment. We have determined that we have nineten reporting units.units, with the Welch Allyn reporting units yet to be defined. Goodwill is assigned to reporting units at the date the goodwill is initially recorded and has been reallocated as necessary based on the restructuring of reporting units over time. Once goodwill has been assigned to reporting units, it no longer retains its association with a particular acquisition, and all of the activities within a reporting unit, whether acquired or organically grown, are available to support the value of the goodwill.
 
At the time of the impairment testing we had eight reporting units and for fiscal 2012, we used a qualitative approach on seven of our eight reporting units to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting units was less than their carrying amounts.  These reporting units had an estimated fair value significantly in excess of their carrying value as of the fiscal 2011 goodwill impairment assessment.  As such, the quantitative assessment was not required to be performed.

 
5459

 
The qualitative goodwillTesting for impairment assessment requires evaluating factors to determinemust be performed annually, or on an interim basis upon the occurrence of a triggering event or change in circumstances that a reporting unit’s carrying value would not more likely than not exceed its fair value.  As part of our goodwill qualitative testing process for each reporting unit, we evaluate various factors that are specific to the reporting unit as well as industry and macroeconomic factors in order to determine whether it is reasonably likely to have a material impact on the fair value of our reporting units. Examples of the factors that were considered included the results of the most recent impairment test, current and long-range forecasted financial results, and changes in the strategic outlook or organizational structure of the reporting units.  The long-range financial forecasts of the reporting units, which are based upon management’s long-term view of our markets and are used by senior management and the Board of Directors to evaluate operating performance were compared to the forecasts used in the prior year analysis to determine if management expectations for the business have changed.  Management changes in strategic outlook or organizational structure represent internally driven strategic or organizational changes that could have a material impact on our results of operations or product offerings.  Industry, market changes and macroeconomic indicators represent our view on changes outside of the Company that could have a material impact on our results of operations, product offerings or future cash flow forecasts.  For testing performed in fiscal 2012, we concluded that there were no changes that were reasonably likely to cause the fair value of the reporting units to be less than the reporting units’ carrying value in the seven reporting units evaluated under this approach.  In the event we were to determine that a reporting unit’s carrying value would more likely than not exceed its fair value, quantitative testing would be performed comparing carrying values to estimated fair values.

Quantitative testing involves a two-step process. The first step, used to identify potential impairment, is a comparison of each reporting unit’s estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill.  Ifreduce the fair value of a reporting unit exceedsbelow its carrying value, applicable goodwill is considered not to be impaired.  If the carrying value exceeds fair value, there is an indication of impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment.amount. The second step requires us to calculate an implied fair value of goodwill.  The implied fair valueannual evaluation of goodwill is determinedperformed during the third quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 did not result in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognizedany impairments.

A 10 percent reduction in a business combination, which is the excess of the fair value of any of our reporting units would not result in an impairment charge.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets

We have various indefinite-lived intangible assets representing trade names with a carrying value of $466.9 million at September 30, 2015 and $32.9 million at September 30, 2014. Testing for impairment must be performed annually, or on an interim basis upon the reporting unit, as determinedoccurrence of a triggering event or change in circumstances that would more likely than not reduce the first step, over the aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination.  If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess.  The first step of the quantitative impairment test was performed on one of our eight reporting units, with the fair value exceeding the carrying value of the reporting unit in excess of 50 percent.  Because this reporting unit’s fair value exceededindefinite-lived intangible asset below its carrying value,amount. The annual evaluation of indefinite-lived intangible assets performed during the goodwill was considered not to be impaired.

During the fourththird quarter of fiscal 2012, we changed our segment reporting to reflect changes2015 and 2014 did not result in our organizational structure and management’s view of the business.  As part of these changes, we combined the North America Acute Care and components of the North America Post-Acute Care segments into a new North America segment.  At the same time we created the Surgical and Respiratory Care segment which contains the surgical reporting unit (formerly part of the North America Acute Care segment), the respiratory care reporting unit (formerly part of the North America Post-Acute Care segment) and the recently acquired Aspen Surgical business.  There were no changes to the International segment.  The prior year segment information included below has been updated to reflect these changes.impairment.

55


The following summarizes goodwill activity:
  North America  
Surgical and
Respiratory Care
  International  Total 
             
             
Balances at September 30, 2010:            
Goodwill $383.0  $56.2  $114.7  $553.9 
Accumulated impairment losses  (358.1)  -   (114.7)  (472.8)
Goodwill, net at September 30, 2010  24.9   56.2   -   81.1 
                 
Changes in Goodwill during the period:                
Goodwill related to acquisitions  -   -   6.1   6.1 
                 
Balances at September 30, 2011:                
Goodwill  383.0   56.2   120.8   560.0 
Accumulated impairment losses  (358.1)  -   (114.7)  (472.8)
Goodwill, net at September 30, 2011  24.9   56.2   6.1   87.2 
                 
Changes in Goodwill during the period:                
Goodwill related to acquisition  -   215.3   35.1   250.4 
Currency translation effect  -   -   (2.4)  (2.4)
                 
Balances at September 30, 2012:                
Goodwill  383.0   271.5   153.5   808.0 
Accumulated impairment losses  (358.1)  -   (114.7)  (472.8)
Goodwill, net at September 30, 2012 $24.9  $271.5  $38.8  $335.2 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we recorded an adjustment to goodwill of $0.3 million related to the Liko Distributors acquisition completed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.  During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we acquired Völker and recorded goodwill on the acquisition of $34.8 million.  During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we acquired Aspen Surgical and recorded goodwill on the acquisition of $215.3 million.

NOTE 4. FINANCING AGREEMENTS

Total debt consists of the following:
  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011 
Outstanding finance credit lines $0.2  $7.8 
Revolving credit facility  105.0   45.0 
Term loan current portion  10.0   - 
Term loan long-term portion  187.5   - 
Unsecured 8.50% debentures due on December 1, 2011  -   47.5 
Unsecured 7.00% debentures due on February 15, 2024  19.6   19.7 
Unsecured 6.75% debentures due on December 15, 2027  29.8   29.8 
Other  0.6   1.3 
Total debt  352.7   151.1 
Less current portion of debt  115.2   100.3 
Total long-term debt $237.5  $50.8 


56

  September 30 
  2015  2014 
Revolving credit facilities $-  $265.0 
Current portion of long-term debt  58.0   16.2 
Senior secured Term Loan A, long-term portion  931.7   - 
Senior secured Term Loan B, long-term portion  778.3   - 
Senior unsecured 5.75% notes due on September 1, 2023  418.2   - 
Term loan under August 2012 credit facility, long-term portion  -   159.6 
Unsecured 7.00% debentures due on February 15, 2024  13.8   19.2 
Unsecured 6.75% debentures due on December 15, 2027  29.6   29.6 
Other  3.6   1.4 
Total debt  2,233.2   491.0 
Less current portion of debt  58.0   126.9 
Total long-term debt $2,175.2  $364.1 

The following table summarizes the scheduled maturities of long-term debt for fiscal years 20132016 through 2017:2020:

  Term Loan 
2013  10.0 
2014  11.3 
2015  16.2 
2016  20.0 
2017  140.0 
  Term Loan A  Term Loan B  Total 
2016 $50.0  $8.0  $58.0 
2017 $75.0  $8.0  $83.0 
2018 $100.0  $8.0  $108.0 
2019 $100.0  $8.0  $108.0 
2020 $675.0  $8.0  $683.0 

In September 2015, the Company entered into four new credit facilities for purposes of financing the Welch Allyn acquisition as well as refinancing our previously outstanding revolving credit facility. These new facilities consisted of the following:
·$1.0 billion senior secured Term Loan A facility (“TLA Facility”), maturing in September 2020
·$800.0 million senior secured Term Loan B facility (“TLB Facility”), maturing in September 2022
·Senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”), providing borrowing capacity of up to $500.0 million, maturing in September 2020
·$425.0 million of senior unsecured notes (“Senior Notes”), maturing in September 2023

The TLA Facility, TLB Facility, and Revolving Credit Facility (collectively, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”) all bear interest at variable rates which are currently less than 4.0 percent. These interest rates are based primarily on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), but under certain conditions could also be based on the U.S. Federal Funds Rate or the U.S. Prime Rate, at the Company’s option. The TLA Facility and TLB Facility have required principal payments. The TLA Facility requires minimum principal payments of $50.0 million in fiscal 2016, $75.0 million in fiscal 2017, and $100.0 million annually thereafter, with the remaining unpaid principal balance due at maturity. The TLB Facility requires annual principal payments of $8.0 million with the remaining unpaid principal balance due at maturity. We will be able to voluntarily prepay outstanding loans under the TLA Facility and the TLB Facility at any time.

60

At September 30, 2015, there were no borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility, but available borrowing capacity was $490.9 million after giving effect to $9.1 million of outstanding standby letters of credit. At September 30, 2014, there were $42.4 million of outstanding standby letters of credit under our previous revolving credit agreements, $39.8 million of which pertained to one standby letter of credit issued in connection with the Trumpf acquisition, which expired in January 2015. The availability of borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility is subject to our ability at the time of borrowing to meet certain specified conditions, including compliance with covenants contained in the governing credit agreement.

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities are held with a syndicate of banks, which includes over 20 institutions. The general corporate assets of the Company and its subsidiaries collateralize these obligations. The credit agreement governing these facilities contains financial covenants which specify a maximum secured net leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio, as such terms are defined in the credit agreement. These financial covenants are measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, with the first measurement date on December 31, 2015. The required ratios vary through December 31, 2019 providing a gradually decreasing maximum secured net leverage ratio and a gradually increasing minimum interest coverage ratio, as set forth in the table below:

Fiscal Quarter Ended
Maximum
Secured Net
Leverage Ratio
Minimum
Interest Coverage
Ratio
December 31, 20154.75x3.25x
December 31, 20164.50x3.25x
December 31, 20174.00x3.50x
December 31, 20183.50x3.75x
December 31, 2019 and thereafter3.00x4.00x

The Senior Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.75 percent annually. These notes were issued at par in a private placement offering and are not registered securities on any public market. All of the Senior Notes are outstanding as of September 30, 2015. We are not required to make any mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the Notes, other than in certain circumstances such as a change in control or material sale of assets. We may redeem the notes prior to maturity, but doing so prior to September 1, 2021 would require payment of a premium on any amounts redeemed, the amount of which varies based on the timing of the redemption. The indenture governing the Senior Notes contains certain covenants which impose limitations on the amount of dividends we may pay and the amount of common shares we may repurchase in the open market, but we do not expect these covenants to affect our current dividend policy or open share repurchase program. The terms of this indenture also impose certain restrictions on the amount and type of additional indebtedness we may obtain in the future, as well as the types of liens and guarantees we may provide.

We are in compliance with all applicable financial covenants as of September 30, 2015.

In conjunction with the issuance of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the Senior Notes, the Company incurred $48.7 million of debt issuance costs. As stated in Note 1, the Company has elected to early-adopt ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” Following this guidance, as of September 30, 2015, unamortized debt issuance costs of $39.1 million have trade finance credit lines and uncommitted letterbeen recorded as a reduction of the carrying value of the related debt, in addition to $9.4 million attributable to the Revolving Credit Facility, which are recorded as a component of other long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These costs will amortize into interest expense over the terms of the related credit facilities.  These lines are associated with the normal course of business and are not currently, nor have they historically, been of material size to the overall business.

Unsecured debentures outstanding at September 30, 20122015 and September 30, 2014 have fixed rates of interest. We have deferred gains included in the amounts above from the termination of previous interest rate swap agreements, and those deferred gains amounted to less than $1$1.0 million at both September 30, 20122015 and September 30, 2011.2014. The deferred gains on the termination of the swaps are being amortized and recognized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt, through 2025, and as a result, the effective interest rates on that debt have been and will continue to be lower than the stated interest rates on the debt.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal
61

From August 2012 through April 2015, we entered intohad a new credit facility.  The new credit facility providesthat provided for revolving loans of up to $500.0 million, plus a term loansloan in the aggregate amount of $200.0 million. It isIn May 2015, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement which provided for revolving loans of up to be used for general corporate purposes, including financing permitted acquisitions.  The Company may request to increase$900.0 million and a term loan of $165.0 million, which replaced the revolving loan commitment and the amountremaining unpaid principal balance of the term loans by up to an additional $250.0 million.  All amounts due underloan from the newAugust 2012 credit facility mature upon expiration on August 24, 2017.  The term loans will amortize so that 37.5 percentfacility. A portion of the principal will be repaid overproceeds from the five year term, withissuance of the balance due at maturity.  The new credit facility replaces in its entirety our previous $500.0 million credit agreement dated March 28, 2008, as amended, which was scheduled to expire in March 2013.  Borrowings under the credit facility and term loan bear interest at variable rates specified therein, that for fiscal 2012 were under 2.0 percent,Senior Secured Credit Facility and the availabilitySenior Notes in September 2015 were used to fully repay these previously outstanding credit facilities, which are now terminated. The termination of borrowings is subjectthese facilities resulted in a charge of $2.6 million due to our ability at the timeacceleration of borrowingdebt issuance costs which were unamortized as of September 2015.

We are exposed to meet certain specified conditions, including compliance with covenants containedmarket risk from fluctuations in the credit agreement governing the facility.interest rates. The credit facility contains covenants that, among other matters, require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (each as defined in the credit agreement) of not more than 3.5:1.0 and a ratio of consolidated EBITDACompany sometimes manages its exposure to interest expenserate fluctuations through the use of not less than 3.5:1.0.  The proceeds of the five-year facility shall be used, as needed: (i) for working capital, capital expenditures, and other lawful corporate purposes; and (ii) to finance acquisitions.

interest rate swaps (cash flow hedges). As of September 30, 2012,2014, we had outstanding borrowingsone interest rate swap agreement to hedge the variability of $105.0 million and undrawn letters of credit of $5.8 million under the $500.0 million five-year facility, leaving $389.2 million of borrowing capacity available under the facility.  The outstanding balance on the term loan was $197.5 million at September 30, 2012, of which $10.0 million is recognized as the currentcash flows associated with a portion of the balance due.variable interest rate payments on then-outstanding term loans. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and was an asset with a fair value of less than $1.0 million as of September 30, 2014. We classify fair value measurements on our interest rate swaps as Level 2, as described in Note 1. Effective with the issuance of the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the interest rate swap was terminated at an immaterial loss.

The fair value of our debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to us for debt of the same remaining maturities. The book values of our short-term debt instruments approximate fair value. The estimated fair values of our long-term debt instruments are described in the table below:

  September 30 
  2015  2014 
Senior secured Term Loan A $990.7  $- 
Senior secured Term Loan B  780.7   - 
Senior unsecured 5.75% notes due on September 1, 2023  428.4   - 
Term loan under August 2012 credit facility  -   175.2 
Unsecured debentures  43.4   55.5 
Total debt $2,243.2  $230.7 
The estimated fair values of our long-term unsecured debentures were $56.2 million and $52.6 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, and were based on observable inputs such as quoted prices in markets that are not active. The estimated fair valuevalues of our term loan was $197.5 millionloans and the Senior Notes were based on quoted prices for similar liabilities at September 30, 2012, and was entered into during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 at current market rates.  Theliabilities. These fair value measurements for both our long-term unsecured debentures and our term loan were classified as Level 2, as described in Note 1.

NOTE 5.OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following tables represent the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the year to date periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:


NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

·Level 1:  Financial instruments with unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities.
  Year Ended September 30, 2015 
  Other comprehensive income (loss)  Accumulated other comprehensive loss 
  
Prior to
reclassification
  
Reclassification
from
  Pre-tax  Tax effect  Net of tax  
Beginning
balance
  Net activity  
Ending
balance
 
Available-for-sale securities
    and currency hedges
 $(0.6) $0.6  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Foreign currency translation
     adjustment
  (58.6)  -   (58.6)  -   (58.6)  (34.2)  (58.6)  (92.8)
Change in pension and postretirement
     defined benefit plans
  (28.7)  15.5   (13.2)  5.1   (8.1)  (39.9)  (8.1)  (48.0)
Total $(87.9) $16.1  $(71.8) $5.1  $(66.7) $(74.1) $(66.7) $(140.8)
 
  Year Ended September 30, 2014 
  Other comprehensive income (loss)  Accumulated other comprehensive loss 
  
Prior to
reclassification
  
Reclassification
from
  Pre-tax  Tax effect  Net of tax  
Beginning
balance
  Net activity  
Ending
balance
 
Available-for-sale securities
    and currency hedges
 $0.3  $0.1  $0.4  $(0.1) $0.3  $(0.3) $0.3  $- 
Foreign currency translation
     adjustment
  (29.6)  -   (29.6)  -   (29.6)  (4.6)  (29.6)  (34.2)
Change in pension and postretirement
     defined benefit plans
  (16.8)  2.7   (14.1)  5.0   (9.1)  (30.8)  (9.1)  (39.9)
Total $(46.1) $2.8  $(43.3) $4.9  $(38.4) $(35.7) $(38.4) $(74.1)
57

·Level 2:  Financial instruments with observable inputs other than those included in Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

·Level 3:  Financial instruments with unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Unobservable inputs shall be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include our own data.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
     Quoted Prices in  Significant Other  Significant 
     Active Markets for  Observable  Unobservable 
  Balance at  Identical Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
  September 30, 2012  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
             
Cash and cash equivalents $84.3  $84.3  $-  $- 
Available-for-sale marketable securities  7.3   -   -   7.3 
Total assets at fair value $91.6  $84.3  $-  $7.3 

     Quoted Prices in  Significant Other  Significant 
     Active Markets for  Observable  Unobservable 
  Balance at  Identical Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
  September 30, 2011  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
             
Cash and cash equivalents $224.6  $224.6  $-  $- 
Available-for-sale marketable securities  11.1   -   -   11.1 
Total assets at fair value $235.7  $224.6  $-  $11.1 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value.

At September 30, 2012, we had $7.3 million of AAA rated investment securities which consisted primarily of student loan auction rate securities.  While we continue to earn interest on the ARS at the contractual rate, these investments are not currently being bought and sold in an active market and therefore do not have readily determinable market values.  At September 30, 2012, our investment advisors provided a valuation based on unobservable inputs for the ARS.  The investment advisors utilized a discounted cash flow approach (an “income approach”) to arrive at this valuation, which was corroborated by separate and comparable discounted cash flow analysis prepared by us.  The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit spread related yield and illiquidity premiums, and expected holding periods of the ARS.  These assumptions are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change.  See below for a reconciliation of the beginning to ending balances of these assets and the related change in the fair value of these assets during fiscal 2012.

Currently, we intend, and believe we have the ability to hold these assets until market conditions are more favorable.  If current market conditions do not improve or worsen, the result could be further realized or unrealized losses.

The following table presents the activity related to our ARS during the fiscal year.

  Available-For-Sale  AOCL  (Gain)/Loss 
          
Balance at October 1, 2011 $11.1  $1.3  $- 
Change in fair value  -   -   - 
Sales or redemptions  (3.8)  (0.8)  0.1 
Balance at September 30, 2012 $7.3  $0.5  $0.1 

 
5862


The componentsfollowing table represents the items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss and the change in our unrealized gains were as follows:
  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011  2010 
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for sale securities:         
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period, net-of-tax $0.7  $(0.2) $0.2 
Less:  Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) realized in net income, net-of-tax  0.1   -   (0.1)
Net change in unrealized gains (losses), net-of-tax $0.8  $(0.2) $0.1 
For therelated tax effects during fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 20112015 and 2010, we recognized income on our investments of $1.3 million, $2.0 million and $2.3 million, which did not include any impairments.2014:

Financial instruments not carried at fair value consist of our debt.  See further fair value discussion in Note 4.
  Years Ended September 30 
  2015  2014 
  
Amount
reclassified
  Tax effect  Net of tax  
Amount
reclassified
  Tax effect  Net of tax 
Change in pension and postretirement
     defined benefit plans (1)
 $15.5  $(5.6) $9.9  $2.7  $(1.0) $1.7 
Available-for-sale securities
    and currency hedges (2)
 $0.6  $(0.2) $0.4  $0.1  $-  $0.1 

The carrying amounts of current assets and liabilities approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.
(1) Reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses.
      These components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit expense.
(2) Reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into other income (expense), net.

NOTE 6. RETIREMENT AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

Our retirement plans consist of defined benefit plans, a postretirement healthcare plan,plans, and defined contribution savings plans. Plans cover certain employees both in and outside of the U.S.
 
Retirement Plans
 
We sponsor fourfive defined benefit plans. Those plans include a master defined benefit retirement plan, a nonqualified supplemental executive defined benefit retirement plan, and twothree defined benefit retirement plans covering employees in Germany and France.  During 2010, we merged the defined benefit plan related to our fiscal 2004 acquisition of Mediq, Inc. (Mediq) into the master defined benefit plan. Benefits for such plans are based primarily on years of service and the employee’s level of compensation during specific periods of employment. We contribute funds to trusts as necessary to provide for current service and for any unfunded projected future benefit obligation over a reasonable period of time. All of our plans have a September 30th30 measurement date.

Effect on Operations

The components of net periodic benefit cost for our defined benefit retirement plans were as follows:
  Years Ended September 30 
  2015  2014  2013 
          
Service cost $5.4  $5.0  $6.1 
Interest cost  14.6   14.4   13.2 
Expected return on plan assets  (16.7)  (16.7)  (15.9)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost, net  0.6   0.6   0.6 
Amortization of net loss  5.2   3.2   7.8 
Net periodic benefit cost  9.1   6.5   11.8 
Settlement charge  9.6   -   - 
Special termination benefits  -   2.4   - 
Net pension expense $18.7  $8.9  $11.8 

  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011  2010 
          
Service cost $5.5  $5.2  $5.1 
Interest cost  13.3   13.2   13.2 
Expected return on plan assets  (16.7)  (16.7)  (13.1)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost, net  0.6   0.6   0.6 
Amortization of net loss  6.1   4.0   2.6 
Net periodic benefit cost $8.8  $6.3  $8.4 
In April, 2015, we offered all terminated vested participants of our domestic master defined benefit retirement plan an option to receive a lump sum cash payout in lieu of their right to future periodic benefit payments under the plan upon their retirement. Lump sums of $42.3 million were paid to participants in September 2015, triggering a plan settlement charge of $9.6 million, which is recorded as a component of Special charges on the Statements of Consolidated Income.
 
 
5963

During the second quarter of Contents
fiscal 2014, we initiated a domestic early retirement program, which offered certain special termination benefits relating to our pension and postretirement health care plans. This program and the related special termination benefits resulted in a non-cash charge of $3.2 million, of which $2.4 million related to our master defined benefit retirement plan and $0.8 million for our postretirement health care plan. The $0.8 million postretirement healthcare charge also reflects a $1.3 million reversal recorded as certain participants elected alternative coverage separate from the postretirement health care plan. The employee elections were not known until the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2014. The reversal was recorded to the special charges caption and is offset by charges recorded to reflect our incremental cost associated with the alternative coverage. Refer to Note 8 for more details.

Obligations and Funded Status

The change in benefit obligations, plan assets and funded status, along with amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for our defined benefit retirement plans were as follows:

 September 30  Years Ended September 30 
 2012  2011  2015  2014 
            
Change in benefit obligation:            
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $295.9  $266.5  $343.8  $297.9 
Service cost  5.5   5.2   5.4   5.0 
Interest cost  13.3   13.2   14.6   14.4 
Actuarial loss  21.7   19.4   12.5   31.4 
Benefits paid  (8.5)  (8.2)  (54.0)  (10.2)
Acquisitions  0.1   -   -   4.3 
Special termination benefits  -   2.4 
Plan settlement  (4.4)  - 
Exchange rate gain  (0.6)  (0.2)  (2.4)  (1.4)
Benefit obligation at end of year  327.4   295.9   315.5   343.8 
                
Change in plan assets:                
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year  217.3   215.7   276.1   254.4 
Actual return on plan assets  37.0   8.8   (3.9)  30.9 
Employer contributions  1.0   1.0   0.9   1.0 
Benefits paid  (8.5)  (8.2)  (54.0)  (10.2)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year  246.8   217.3   219.1   276.1 
Funded status and net amounts recognized $(80.6) $(78.6) $(96.4) $(67.7)
                
Amounts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:                
Accrued pension benefits, current portion $(0.1) $(0.1) $(1.0) $(1.0)
Accrued pension benefits, long-term  (80.5)  (78.5)  (95.4)  (66.7)
Net amount recognized $(80.6) $(78.6) $(96.4) $(67.7)

In addition to the amounts above, net actuarial losses of $100.0$79.3 million and prior service costs of $2.4$1.0 million, less an applicable aggregate tax effect of $38.7$30.0 million are included as components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)accumulated other comprehensive loss at September 30, 2012. At September 30, 2011,2015. In addition to the amounts above, net actuarial losses of $104.2$65.0 million and prior service costs of $2.9$1.7 million, less an applicable aggregate tax effect of $40.7$24.8 million wereare included as components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).accumulated other comprehensive loss at September 30, 2014
 
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost for our defined benefit retirement plans that will be amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $7.8$4.5 million and $0.6 million.$0.3 million, respectively.

 
6064


Accumulated Benefit Obligation

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $302.4$296.7 million and $271.6$325.9 million at September 30, 20122015 and 2011.2014. Selected information for our plans, including plans with accumulated benefit obligations exceeding plan assets, was as follows:

 September 30  September 30 
 2012  2011  2015  2014 
 PBO  ABO  Plan Assets  PBO  ABO  Plan Assets  PBO  ABO  Plan Assets  PBO  ABO  Plan Assets 
                                    
Master plan $292.5  $275.3  $218.9  $319.1  $303.2  $275.8 
International plans  17.9   16.3   0.2   20.3   18.5   0.3 
Supplemental executive plan $4.4  $4.2  $-  $4.4  $3.7  $-   5.1   5.1   -   4.4   4.2   - 
Master plan  309.5   285.7   246.4   278.5   255.7   216.9 
German plan  10.4   10.4   -   10.5   10.5   - 
French plan  3.1   2.1   0.4   2.5   1.7   0.4 
 $327.4  $302.4  $246.8  $295.9  $271.6  $217.3  $315.5  $296.7  $219.1  $343.8  $325.9  $276.1 

Actuarial Assumptions

The weighted average assumptions used in accounting for our domestic pension plans were as follows:

 2012  2011  2010  2015 2014 2013
Weighted average assumptions to determined benefit         
Weighted average assumptions to determine benefit      
obligations at the measurement date:               
Discount rate for obligation  4.1%  4.6%  5.1% 4.4% 4.5% 5.0%
Rate of compensation increase  3.3%  3.5%  3.5% 3.0% 3.0% 3.3%
                  
Weighted average assumptions to determined benefit            
Weighted average assumptions to determine benefit      
cost for the year:                  
Discount rate for expense  4.6%  5.1%  5.5% 4.5% 5.0% 4.1%
Expected rate of return on plan assets  7.5%  7.5%  7.5% 6.8% 7.0% 7.0%
Rate of compensation increase  3.5%  3.5%  4.0% 3.0% 3.3% 3.3%

The discount rates used in the valuation of our defined benefit pension plans are evaluated annually based on current market conditions. In setting these rates we utilize long-term bond indices and yield curves as a preliminary indication of interest rate movements, and then make adjustments to the respective indices to reflect differences in the terms of the bonds covered under the indices in comparison to the projected outflow of our pension obligations. The overall expected long-term rate of return is based on historical and expected future returns, which are inflation adjusted and weighted for the expected return for each component of the investment portfolio, as well as taking into consideration economic and capital market conditions. The rate of assumed compensation increase is also based on our specific historical trends of past wage adjustments. The weighted average discount rate assumptions used for our international plans are lower than our domestic plan assumptions and do not significantly affect the consolidated net benefit obligation or net periodic benefit cost balances.

Plan Assets

The weighted average asset allocations of our master defined benefit retirement plan at September 30, 20122015 and 2011,2014, by asset category, along with target allocations, are as follows:

  2012 2011 2012 20112015 2014 2015 2014
  Target Target Actual ActualTarget Target Actual Actual
  Allocation Allocation Allocation AllocationAllocation Allocation Allocation Allocation
                
Equity securities  40 - 60% 40 - 60% 50% 47%39 - 49% 40 - 60% 42% 52%
Fixed income securities  40 - 60% 40 - 60% 50% 53%51 - 61% 40 - 60% 58% 48%
Total      100% 100%    100% 100%

 
6165


We have a Plan Committee that sets investment guidelines with the assistance of an external consultant. These guidelines are established based on market conditions, risk tolerance, funding requirements and expected benefit payments. The Plan Committee also oversees the investment allocation process selects the investment managers and monitors asset performance. As pension liabilities are long-term in nature, we employ a long-term total return approach to maximize the long-term rate of return on plan assets for a prudent level of risk. Target allocations are guidelines, not limitations, and plan fiduciaries may occasionally approve allocations above or below a target range or elect to rebalance the portfolio within the targeted range.

The investment portfolio contains a diversified portfolio of primarily equities and fixed income securities. Securities are also diversified in terms of domestic and international securities, short- and long-term securities, growth and value styles, large cap and small cap stocks. The Plan Committee believes with prudent risk tolerance and asset diversification,primary investment strategy is a dynamic target allocation method that periodically rebalances among various investment categories depending on the account should be ablecurrent funded positions. This program is designed to meet its pension obligations in the future.actively move from return-seeking investments (such as equities) toward liability-hedging investments (such as long-duration fixed income) as funding levels improve.

Trust assets are invested subject to the following policy restrictions: short-term securities must be rated A2/P2 or higher; all fixed-income securities shall have a credit quality rating “BBB” or higher; investments in equities in any one company may not exceed 10 percent of the equity portfolio.

Fair Value Measurements of Plan Assets

The following table summarizes the valuation of our pension plan assets by pricing categories:

    Quoted Prices in  Significant        Quoted Prices in  Significant    
    Active Markets  Other  Significant     Active Markets  Other  Significant 
    for Identical  Observable  Unobservable     for Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
 Balance at  Assets  Inputs  Inputs  Balance at  Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
 September 30, 2012  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  September 30, 2015  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Cash $2.3  $2.3  $-  $-  $3.5  $3.5  $-  $- 
Equities                                
US companies  87.8   87.8   -   - 
U.S. companies  47.1   -   47.1   - 
International companies  34.9   34.9   -   -   44.8   -   44.8   - 
Fixed income securities  121.4   64.1   57.3   -   123.7   -   123.7   - 
Other  0.4   0.4   -   - 
Total plan assets at fair value $246.8  $189.5  $57.3  $-  $219.1  $3.5  $215.6  $- 
                

    Quoted Prices in  Significant        Quoted Prices in  Significant    
    Active Markets  Other  Significant     Active Markets  Other  Significant 
    for Identical  Observable  Unobservable     for Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
 Balance at  Assets  Inputs  Inputs  Balance at  Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
 September 30, 2011  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  September 30, 2014  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
Cash $2.3  $2.3  $-  $-  $2.1  $2.1  $-  $- 
Equities                                
US companies  70.3   70.3   -   - 
U.S. companies  101.7   101.7   -   - 
International companies  30.7   30.7   -   -   38.7   38.7   -   - 
Fixed income securities  113.6   58.4   55.2   -   133.2   66.8   66.4   - 
Other  0.4   0.4   -   -   0.4   0.4   -   - 
Total plan assets at fair value $217.3  $162.1  $55.2  $-  $276.1  $209.7  $66.4  $- 

The Level 2 fixed income securitiesinvestments are commingled funds and/or collective trusts valued using the net asset value (“NAV”) unit price provided by the fund administrator. The NAV is based on the value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, all of which are publicly traded securities.fund. For further descriptions of the asset Levels used in the above chart, refer to Note 5.1.

 
6266


Cash Flows

Our U.S. qualified defined benefit plan is funded in excess of 80 percent, as measured under the requirements of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, and therefore we expect that the plan will not be subject to the “at risk” funding requirements of the Pension Protection Act.this legislation.

During 20122015 and 2011,2014, we contributed cash of $1.0$0.9 million and $1.0 million to our defined benefit retirement plans. We dowill not expectbe required to contribute to our master defined benefit retirement plan in fiscal year 2013,2016 due to the significant contribution of $50.0 million made during 2010,current funding level; however, minimal contributions will be required for our unfunded plans.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The benefit payments, which are expected to be funded through plan assets and company contributions and reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid as follows:

  Pension Benefits 
2013 $10.2 
2014  10.8 
2015  11.6 
2016  12.5 
2017  13.4 
2018-2022  82.4 
  Pension Benefits 
2016 $12.3 
2017 $12.8 
2018 $13.3 
2019 $14.0 
2020 $14.8 
2021-2025 $86.5 

Defined Contribution Savings Plans

We have defined contribution savings plans that cover substantially all U.S. employees and certain non-U.S. employees. The general purpose of these plans is to provide additional financial security during retirement by providing employees with an incentive to make regular savings. Company contributions to the plans are based on eligibility and employee contributions. Expense under these plans was $13.3$17.4 million, $13.0$15.0 million and $12.6$15.8 million in fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013.

Postretirement Health Care PlanPlans

In addition to defined benefit retirement plans, we also offer atwo domestic postretirement health care planplans, one of which was assumed in the acquisition of Welch Allyn, that providesprovide health care benefits to qualified retirees and their dependents. The plan includesplans are closed to new participants and include retiree cost sharing provisions and generally extends retiree coverage for medical prescription and dentalprescription benefits beyond the COBRA continuation period to the date of Medicare eligibility. We use a measurement date of September 30 for this plan.these plans.

67

The postretirement health care plans, including the Welch Allyn plan on a post-acquisition basis, reflected a benefitcredit during fiscal 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 of ($0.3)0.2) million, ($0.1)0.2) million and ($1.0)0.1) million. The change in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was as follows:

 Years Ended September 30  Years Ended September 30 
 2012  2011  2015  2014 
Change in benefit obligation:            
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $9.5  $9.7  $11.2  $9.8 
Service cost  0.4   0.4   0.4   0.4 
Interest cost  0.3   0.4   0.4   0.4 
Acquired obligation  14.1   - 
Actuarial gain  -   (0.6)  (0.9)  (0.2)
Benefits paid  (0.9)  (0.7)  (0.2)  (0.2)
Retiree contributions  0.3   0.3   0.1   0.2 
Special termination benefits  -   0.8 
Benefit obligation at end of year $9.6  $9.5  $25.1  $11.2 
                
Amounts recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:                
Accrued benefits obligation, current portion $0.5  $0.6  $1.8  $1.1 
Accrued benefits obligation, long-term  9.1   8.9   23.3   10.1 
Net amount recognized $9.6  $9.5  $25.1  $11.2 

63

During fiscal 2012 and 2011, weWe contributed $0.6 million and $0.4less than $0.2 million to the plan.plans in fiscal 2015, including the post-acquisition period for the Welch Allyn plan, compared with $0.1 million contributed in fiscal 2014.

In addition to the amounts above, net actuarial gains of $1.6$2.4 million and prior service credits of $3.8$1.4 million, less an applicable aggregate tax effect of $2.1$1.5 million are included as components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)accumulated other comprehensive loss at September 30, 2012. At September 30, 2011,2015. In addition to the amounts above, net actuarial gains of $1.7 million and prior service credits of $4.8$2.3 million, less an applicable aggregate tax effect of $2.5($1.6) million wereare included as components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).accumulated other comprehensive loss at September 30, 2014.

The estimated net actuarial gain and prior service benefit for our postretirement health care planplans that will be amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are ($0.1) million and ($0.9) million.

The discount rate used to determine the net periodic benefit cost for the postretirement health care planplans during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was 4.0, 4.43.7, 4.1 and 5.53.3 percent. The discount rate used to determine the benefit obligation as of September 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was 3.3, 4.03.5, 3.7 and 4.44.1 percent. As of September 30, 2012 the health care-cost trend rates for the plans were generally assumed to decrease as follows:

  2012 2011 2010
       
Year 1 6.75% 7.25% 7.75%
Year 2 6.25% 6.75% 7.25%
Year 3 5.75% 6.25% 6.75%
Year 4 5.25% 5.75% 6.25%
Year 5 5.00% 5.25% 5.75%
Year 6 5.00% 5.00% 5.25%
Year 7 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Year 8 and beyond 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
be in the ranges of 5.25 to 7.0 percent, trending down to a rate between 4 and 5 percent over the long-term.

A one-percentage-point increase/decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rates as of September 30, 20122015 would cause an increase/decrease in service and interest costs of less than $0.1 million, along with an increase/decrease in the benefit obligation of $0.9$1.9 million and $0.8 million.$1.7 million, respectively.

We fund the postretirement health care planplans as benefits are paid, and current plan benefits are expected to require net company contributions of approximately $0.5$1.8 million in fiscal 20132016 and less than $1.0$2 million per year thereafter.

NOTE 7. COMMON STOCK

Share Repurchases

We repurchased 1.51.2 million, 3.01.7 million and 1.02.8 million shares of our common stock during fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 for $42.4$54.8 million, $110.0$70.5 million and $34.5$92.7 million, respectively, in the open market. In May 2011, ourThe common stock was acquired under a $190 million share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors approvedin September 2013, which does not have an expansion of our share repurchase authorization by 3.0 million shares.  Share repurchases may be made through the open market or private transactions.  As of September 30, 2012 a cumulative total of 28.2 million shares had been repurchased by us at market trading prices, leaving 0.5 million shares remaining for purchase under the Board’s authorization.  The Board’s approval has no expiration date and currently theredate. There are no plans to terminate this program in the future.future, but repurchases will be suspended temporarily as we allocate free cash flow to debt service following the Welch Allyn acquisition. Repurchases may be made on the open market or via private transactions, and are used for general business purposes.

68

Stock-Based Compensation

We have stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors may be granted options to purchase shares of Company common stock at the fair market value at the time of grant. In addition to stock options, we grant performance-based stock options, performance share units (“PSUs”) and RSUs to certain management level employees and vested deferred stock to non-employee directors. We also offer eligible employees the opportunity to buy shares of our common stock at a discount via an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).  The ESPP was approved by our shareholders in fiscal 2009 and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements in any fiscal year.

Our primary stock-based compensation program is the Stock Incentive Plan, which has been approved by our shareholders. Under the Stock Incentive Plan, we have a total of 15.3 million authorized shares. At September 30, 2012, 5.52015, 4.3 million shares were available for future grants under our stock-based compensation plans. We generally settle our stock-based awards with treasury shares. As of September 30, 2012,2015, we had 19.523.3 million treasury shares available for use to settle stock-based awards.
64


The following table sets forth a summary of the annual stock-based compensation cost that was charged against income for all types of awards:

 Years Ended September 30  Years Ended September 30 
 2012  2011  2010  2015  2014  2013 
                  
Total stock-based compensation cost (pre-tax) $11.6  $12.2  $12.0  $25.0  $18.0  $13.5 
Total income tax benefit  (4.2)  (4.5)  (4.4)  (7.5)  (6.5)  (4.9)
Total stock-based compensation cost, net of tax $7.4  $7.7  $7.6  $17.5  $11.5  $8.6 

Stock Options

Stock options granted by our Compensation Committee under the Stock Incentive Plan are non-qualified stock options. These awards are generally granted with exercise prices equal to the average of the high and low prices of our common stock on the date of grant. They vest in equal annual installments over a three or four year period and the maximum contractual term is ten years. We use a Binomial option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options, and compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The following table sets forth the weighted average fair value per share of stock options and the related valuation assumptions used in the determination of those fair values, excluding performance-based stock options:values:

 Years Ended September 30  Years Ended September 30 
 2012  2011  2010  2015  2014  2013 
Weighted average fair value per share $9.79  $12.31  $7.86  $12.83  $11.91  $7.91 
                        
Valuation assumptions:                        
Risk-free interest rate  1.0%   1.2%   2.4%   1.6%   1.3%   0.6% 
Expected dividend yield  1.4%   1.1%   1.7%   1.4%   1.4%   1.9% 
Expected volatility  41.2%   37.3%   37.2%   35.0%   36.1%   40.2% 
Weighted average expected life  4.8 years   5.3 years   5.6 years   4.9 years   4.9 years   4.9 years 
 
The risk-free interest rate is based upon observed U.S. Treasury interest rates appropriate for the term of our employee stock options. Expected dividend yield is based on the history and our expectation of dividend payouts. Expected volatility for options was based on the median volatility of our Peer Group.historical stock price volatility. Expected life represents the weighted average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and is a derived output of the Binomial model. The expected life of employee stock options is impacted by the above assumptions as well as the post-vesting forfeiture rate and the exercise factor used in the Binomial model. These two variables are based on the history of exercises and forfeitures for previous stock options granted by us and Hillenbrand Industries, Inc., our predecessor.us.

 
6569


The following table summarizes transactions under our stock option plans excluding performance-based stock options, for fiscal year 2012:2015:
 
 Weighted    Weighted    Weighted    Weighted   
 Average  Weighted Average Aggregate  Average  Weighted Average Aggregate 
 Number of  Average Remaining Intrinsic  Number of  Average Remaining Intrinsic 
 Shares  Exercise Contractual Value (1)  Shares  Exercise Contractual Value (1) 
 (in thousands)  Price Term (in millions)  (in thousands)  Price Term (in millions) 
                    
Balance Outstanding at October 1, 2011  1,704  $30.05     
Balance Outstanding at October 1, 2014  1,992  $31.99     
Granted  825   30.65       381   45.01     
Exercised  (144)  24.00       (371)  31.83     
Cancelled/Forfeited  (282)  32.28       (101)  36.63     
Balance Outstanding at September 30, 2012  2,103  $30.41 7.4 years $3.9 
Exercisable at September 30, 2012  731  $28.60 5.4 years $2.1 
Balance Outstanding at September 30, 2015  1,901  $34.38 6.6 years $33.5 
Exercisable at September 30, 2015  1,060  $30.98 5.3 years $22.3 
Options Expected to Vest  1,184  $31.26 8.4 years $1.7   773  $38.34 8.0 years $10.6 
 

(1)The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on our closing stock price of $29.06,$51.99, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on September 30, 2012.2015. This amount, which changes continuously based on the fair value of our common stock, would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of the balance sheet date.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was $1.3$6.3 million, $23.3$4.6 million and $3.9$1.6 million.

As of September 30, 2012,2015, there was $9.4$4.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options granted under the Plan. This unrecognized compensation expense does not reflect a reduction for our estimate of potential forfeitures, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.32.4 years.

Performance-Based Stock Options

Our Compensation Committee sometimes grants performance-based stock options to a limited number of our executives. These awards are consistent with our compensation program’s guiding principles and are designed to align management’s interests with those of shareholders. Option prices and the term of such awards are similar to our stock options; however, vesting of the performance grants is contingent upon the achievement of performance targets and corresponding service requirements. Performance targets are set at the date of grant with a threshold, target and maximum level. The number of options that ultimately vests increases at each level of performance attained. Expense recognized to date related to performance-based stock options has not been significant.

The fair values of the performance options are estimated on the date of the grant using the Binomial option-pricing model and related valuation assumptions for stock options, as previously discussed. For certain performance awards with a market condition such as total shareholder return, as described below, a Monte-Carlo simulation method is used to determine fair value. The Monte-Carlo simulation is a generally accepted statistical technique used to generate a defined number of stock price paths in order to develop a reasonable estimate of the range of our and the Peer Group’s future expected stock prices and minimizes standard error.

As of September 30, 2012, the total number of performance-based stock options granted and outstanding is approximately 0.2 million shares. There is no unrecognized compensation expense related to performance-based stock options as of September 30, 2012 as the performance period concluded as of September 30, 2011.

The basis for the assumptions listed above is similar to the valuation assumptions used for non-performance-based stock options, as discussed previously.

66


The following table summarizes our stock option activity related to performance-based stock options for fiscal year 2012.

  Weighted    Weighted   
  Average  Weighted Average Aggregate 
  Number of  Average Remaining Intrinsic 
  Shares  Exercise Contractual Value (1) 
  (in thousands)  Price Term (in millions) 
            
Balance Outstanding at October 1, 2011  524  $19.39      
Granted  -   -      
Exercised  (217)  19.39      
Cancelled/Forfeited  (131)  19.39      
Balance Outstanding at September 30, 2012  176  $19.39 3.7 years $                  1.7 

(1)  The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on our closing stock price of $29.06 as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on September 30, 2012. This amount, which changes continuously based on the fair value of our common stock, would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of the balance sheet date.

Restricted Stock Units

RSUs are granted to certain employees with fair values equal to the average of the high and low prices of our common stock on the date of grant, multiplied by the number of units granted. RSU grants are contingent upon continued employment and vest over periods ranging from one to fivefour years. Dividends, payable in common stock equivalents, accrue on the grants and are subject to the same specified terms as the original grants, including the risk of forfeiture.

The following table summarizes transactions for our nonvested RSUs for fiscal year 2012:2015:

    Weighted     Weighted 
 Number of  Average  Number of  Average 
 Share Units  Grant Date  Share Units  Grant Date 
 (in thousands)  Fair Value  (in thousands)  Fair Value 
            
Nonvested RSUs at October 1, 2011  406  $29.03 
Nonvested RSUs at October 1, 2014  431  $34.92 
Granted  108   30.76   351   47.85 
Vested  (139)  26.77   (93)  37.76 
Forfeited  (68)  30.45   (55)  35.90 
Nonvested RSUs at September 30, 2012  307  $30.38 
Nonvested RSUs at September 30, 2015  634  $41.35 

As of September 30, 2012,2015, there was $5.3$13.4 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested RSUs granted under the Stock Incentive Plan. This unrecognized compensation expense does not reflect a reduction for our estimate of potential forfeitures, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2 years. The total vest date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was $6.8$4.3 million, $15.9$5.3 million and $7.3$5.4 million.

70

Performance Share Units

Our Compensation Committee grants PSUs to certain employees and these awards are subject to any stock dividends, stock splits, and other similar rights inuring to common stock, but unlike our RSUs are not entitled to dividend reinvestment. Vesting of the grants is contingent upon achievement of performance targets and corresponding service requirements.

The fair value of the PSUs is equal to the average of the high and low prices of our common stock on the date of grant, multiplied by the number of units granted. For PSUs with a market condition such as total shareholder return, the Monte-Carlo simulation method is used to determine fair value. The Monte-Carlo simulation is a generally accepted statistical technique used to generate a defined number of stock price paths in order to develop a reasonable estimate of the range of our and the Peer Group’s future expected stock prices.

The following table sets forth the weighted average fair value per share for total shareholder return PSUs and the related valuation assumptions used in the determination of those fair values:values. PSUs granted in both fiscal 2015 and 2014 are based on company-specific performance targets, with a total shareholder return collar, while grants in fiscal 2013 are based entirely on shareholder return targets.

  Years Ended September 30
  2015 2014 2013
Weighted average fair value per share $47.82 $47.91 $19.77
       
Valuation assumptions:      
Risk-free interest rate 0.9% 0.5% 0.3%
Expected dividend yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Expected volatility 23.5% 30.1% 32.6%
67

  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011 
Weighted average fair value per share $23.26  $31.13 
       
Valuation assumptions:      
Risk-free interest rate 0.4%  0.8% 
Expected dividend yield 0.0%  1.1% 
Expected volatility 35.6%  39.8 - 41.7% 

The basis for the assumptions listed above is similar to the valuation assumptions used for stock options, as discussed previously.

The following table summarizes transactions for our nonvested PSUs for fiscal 2012:
     Weighted 
  Number of  Average 
  Share Units  Grant Date 
  (in thousands)  Fair Value 
       
Nonvested PSUs as of October 1, 2011  242  $22.52 
Granted  265   23.26 
Vested  (36)  13.20 
Forfeited  (79)  21.30 
Nonvested PSUs at September 30, 2012  392  $25.40 
2015:

     Weighted 
  Number of  Average 
  Share Units  Grant Date 
  (in thousands)  Fair Value 
       
Nonvested PSUs as of October 1, 2014  586  $29.98 
Granted  331   49.27 
Vested  (414)  30.11 
Cancelled  (76)  24.57 
Forfeited  (73)  41.15 
Nonvested PSUs at September 30, 2015  354  $42.16 

As of September 30, 2012,2015, there was $6.1$10.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to PSUs granted under the Stock Incentive Plan based on the expected achievement of certain performance targets or market conditions. This unrecognized compensation expense does not reflect a reduction for our estimate of potential forfeitures, and is expected to be recognized by the end of fiscal 2014.2017. The total vest date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 was $20.5 million.

71

NOTE 8. SPECIAL CHARGES

Over the past several years, we have placed a focus on improving our cost structure and business processes through various means including consolidation of certain manufacturing and select back office operations, customer rationalizations and various other organizational changes. TheAs a result of these actions, we recognized special charges associated with these actionsof $41.2 million, $37.1 million, and $5.7 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. These charges are summarized below.

2012 ActionsWelch Allyn Integration
·During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $4.7 million for certain tangible assets for which the carrying values could not be fully recovered as a result of strategic decisions made relative to the exiting of underperforming portions of our home care business.  Also associated with this action was the elimination of approximately 100 positions and the related charge of $1.0 million, primarily related to severance and other benefits to be provided to the effected employees.  These actions and the related cash expenditures are expected to be completed by the end of fiscal year 2013.
In conjunction with the acquisition of Welch Allyn in September 2015, we eliminated approximately 80 positions, primarily in Welch Allyn’s corporate support and administrative functions, which became redundant as a result of merging into Hill-Rom. We recorded $14.4 million of special charges in conjunction with this action in fiscal 2015 for severance and employee benefits provided to affected employees. Many of the affected employees must continue service for a specified period of time after completion of the merger in order to receive the severance benefits offered. As a result, additional charges related to this action of approximately $3 million will be recorded in fiscal 2016 until those service obligations are fulfilled.

·During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we announced a plan to improve our cost structure and streamline our organization by, among other things, eliminating approximately 200 positions across the Company resulting in a special charge of $9.3 million, net of reversals, recognized throughout fiscal 2012 primarily related to severance and other benefits to be provided to the effected employees.  We also recorded an impairment of certain tangible assets for which the carrying values could not be fully recovered as a result of various strategic decisions, which resulted in a non-cash charge of $3.2 million.  In addition, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $8.0 million related to a previously acquired trade name whose assessment was triggered by strategic changes in how the asset would be utilized on a go forward basis.  These actions and the related cash expenditures were substantially complete by the end of fiscal year 2012, but some will be paid in fiscal 2013.
Pension Settlement Charge
68

2011 Actions
·During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded an additional special charge of $2.6 million related to our fiscal 2010 fourth quarter action.  The majority of the charge related to additional severance and other benefits provided to affected employees of that action as well as a write-down of assets held for sale.  During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded a benefit of $1.2 million primarily related to the net reversal of severance recorded in relation to our fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 restructuring action, partially offset by an additional write-down of assets held for sale.  The remainder of the cash expenditures associated with the severance will be completed before the end of fiscal 2013.
$9.6 million. This charge was recorded as a component of special charges in fiscal 2015.

2010 ActionsSite Consolidation
·During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we announced plans to eliminate approximately 100 positions which resulted in a special charge of $4.3 million primarily related to severance and other benefits provided to affected employees.  We also recorded a charge of $3.9 million related to write-downs associated with the planned disposal of two aircraft from our corporate aviation assets, which are jointly owned with Hillenbrand, Inc.  The loss was recognized net of management’s estimate of amounts to be recovered.  The assets held for sale are recorded in other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we initiated a plan to streamline our operations and simplify our supply chain by consolidating certain manufacturing and distribution operations. As part of this action, we announced the closure of sites in Redditch, England and Charleston, South Carolina. Upon closure, each site’s operations will either be relocated to other existing Company facilities or outsourced to third-party suppliers. For the year ended September 30, 2015, we recorded severance and benefit charges of $2.7 million for approximately 160 employees to be displaced by the closures, as well as $1.8 million of other related costs. We expect to incur approximately $3 million of additional charges in the first half of fiscal 2016 for personnel costs and site closure expenses related to this action until the closures are complete.

·During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, we announced organizational changes including the elimination of approximately 160 positions across the Company. The result was a special charge of $5.0 million primarily related to severance and other benefits provided to affected employees. The majority of the cash expenditures associated with the severance was completed by the end of our 2011 fiscal year.
Global Restructuring Program
During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we announced a global restructuring program focused on improving our cost structure. This action included early retirement and reduction in force programs that eliminated over 200 net positions, primarily in the U.S., where the action was substantially completed in fiscal 2014 with cash expenditures continuing during fiscal 2015. The program also included a reduction of our European manufacturing capacity and a streamlining of global operations by, among other things, executing a back office process transformation program in Europe. The restructuring in Europe is in process and has resulted in severance and benefit charges of $6.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2015, as well as other costs of $7.2 million related to legal and professional fees, temporary labor, project management, and other administrative functions. In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we also reversed $0.5 million of previously recorded severance and benefit charges due to certain plan participants declining continuing healthcare coverage.

Severance activity relatedSince the inception of the global restructuring program through September 30, 2015, we have recognized aggregate special charges of $37.6 million, which are recorded in both fiscal 2014 and 2015. Charges of $24.9 million were recorded in the year ended September 30, 2014, net of reversals. We expect to these actions during fiscal 2012 was as follows:incur $5 to $10 million of additional European restructuring costs through the completion of the program.

  Beginning           Ending 
  Balance           Balance 
  September 30,           September 30, 
  2011  Expenses  Cash Payments  Reversals  2012 
Fiscal Year 2012               
Q2 Action - Restructuring $-  $8.4  $(5.0) $-  $3.4 
Q4 Action - Restructuring  -   1.0   -   -   1.0 
Total Fiscal Year 2012 $-  $9.4  $(5.0) $-  $4.4 
                     
Fiscal Year 2010                    
Q2 Action - Restructuring $0.4  $-  $(0.4) $-  $- 
Q4 Action - Restructuring  1.5   -   (0.9)  (0.3)  0.3 
Total Fiscal Year 2010 $1.9  $-  $(1.3) $(0.3) $0.3 
                     
Total $1.9  $9.4  $(6.3) $(0.3) $4.7 
Discontinuance of Third-Party Payer Rentals
Also during the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we initiated a plan to discontinue third-party payer rentals of therapy products occurring primarily in home care settings. Special charges recorded for this action included a $7.7 million non-cash tangible asset impairment charge, a $2.0 million charge for severance and other benefits for approximately 70 eliminated positions, and $1.6 million in other related costs, net of a reversal of $0.2 million which was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2014. This action is substantially complete.

Batesville Manufacturing Early Retirement Program
During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, we initiated a plan to improve our cost structure and streamline our organization by offering an early retirement program to certain manufacturing employees in our Batesville, Indiana plant, meeting specific eligibility requirements, and other minor reduction in force actions. These programs resulted in the elimination of approximately 35 positions and required recognition of a special charge of approximately $1 million for lump sum payments under the program and severance and other benefits provided to other affected employees. This action was substantially complete by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2014.

 
6972

 
Fiscal 2013 Restructuring Program
During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we announced a plan to improve our cost structure and streamline our organization by eliminating in excess of 100 positions across the Company, roughly half of which were contract and open positions. This resulted in a special charge of $1.7 million related to severance and other benefits to be provided to affected employees. We also incurred a contract termination charge of $0.6 million, a non-cash asset impairment charge of $0.2 million related to a product discontinuance action and $1.0 million in other related costs. We reversed $0.6 million of a fiscal 2012 severance and other benefits charge that was determined to be excessive during the second quarter of fiscal 2013. During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2013, we continued actions under the previously announced plan and incurred charges of $0.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively. These actions and the related cash expenditures are substantially complete.

For all accrued severance and other benefit charges described above, we record restructuring reserves within other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities. The reserve activity for severance and other benefits during fiscal 2015 was as follows:

Balance at September 30, 2014 $11.7 
Expenses  23.1 
Cash Payments  (10.0)
Reversals  (0.5)
Balance at September 30, 2015 $24.3 

NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES

The significant components of income before income taxes and the consolidated income tax provision were as follows:

 Years Ended September 30  Years Ended September 30 
 2012  2011  2010  2015  2014  2013 
Income before income taxes:                  
Domestic $148.6  $122.5  $169.4  $49.2  $87.0  $120.0 
Foreign  14.9   37.2   13.5   15.9   28.2   24.0 
Total $163.5  $159.7  $182.9  $65.1  $115.2  $144.0 
                        
Income tax expense:                        
Current provision                        
Federal $65.9  $41.1  $35.9  $35.3  $40.2  $45.0 
State  4.3   2.3   (5.3)  3.6   3.1   1.8 
Foreign  4.8   4.3   7.0   1.7   7.4   7.0 
Total current provision  75.0   47.7   37.6   40.6   50.7   53.8 
Deferred provision:                        
Federal  (29.2)  (0.8)  15.2   (18.1)  (12.2)  (9.9)
State  0.1   (0.2)  4.4   (1.3)  (1.0)  1.1 
Foreign  (3.2)  (20.5)  (0.3)  (2.9)  17.1   (6.0)
Total deferred provision  (32.3)  (21.5)  19.3   (22.3)  3.9   (14.8)
Income tax expense $42.7  $26.2  $56.9  $18.3  $54.6  $39.0 

73


Differences between income tax expense reported for financial reporting purposes and that computed based upon the application of the statutory U.S. Federal tax rate to the reported income before income taxes were as follows:

  Years Ended September 30 
  2015  2014  2013 
     % of     % of     % of 
     Pretax     Pretax     Pretax 
  Amount  Income  Amount  Income  Amount  Income 
                   
Federal income tax (a)
 $22.8   35.0  $40.3   35.0  $50.4   35.0 
State income tax (b)
  1.6   2.4   2.0   1.7   2.5   1.7 
Foreign income tax (c)
  (10.2)  (15.7)  (7.7)  (6.7)  (5.7)  (4.0)
Application of federal tax credits  (2.2)  (3.4)  (0.6)  (0.5)  (3.5)  (2.4)
Adjustment of estimated income tax accruals  (1.6)  (2.4)  (0.6)  (0.5)  (1.5)  (1.0)
Valuation of tax attributes  4.0   6.2   21.3   18.5   0.6   0.4 
Domestic manufacturer's deduction  (1.5)  (2.3)  (1.8)  (1.5)  (2.2)  (1.5)
Capitalized transaction costs  2.5   3.8   0.3   0.2   -   - 
Other, net  2.9   4.5   1.4   1.2   (1.6)  (1.1)
Income tax expense $18.3   28.1  $54.6   47.4  $39.0   27.1 
  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011  2010 
     % of     % of     % of 
     Pretax     Pretax     Pretax 
  Amount  Income  Amount  Income  Amount  Income 
                   
Federal income tax (a)
 $57.2   35.0  $55.9   35.0  $64.0   35.0 
State income tax (b)
  3.5   2.2   2.4   1.5   4.8   2.6 
Foreign income tax (c)
  (3.4)  (2.1)  (8.0)  (5.0)  (0.6)  (0.3)
International tax restructuring  (11.0)  (6.7)  -   -   -   - 
Application of federal tax credits  (0.6)  (0.4)  (4.1)  (2.5)  (0.6)  (0.3)
Adjustment of estimated income tax accruals  (2.1)  (1.3)  2.3   1.4   (9.7)  (5.4)
Valuation of tax attributes  0.3   0.2   (19.5)  (12.2)  -   - 
Other, net  (1.2)  (0.8)  (2.8)  (1.8)  (1.0)  (0.5)
Income tax expense $42.7   26.1  $26.2   16.4  $56.9   31.1 

(a)
At statutory rate.
(b)Net of Federal benefit.
(c)Federal tax rate differential.
70


The tax effect of temporary differences that gave rise to the deferred tax balance sheet accounts were as follows:

 Years Ended September 30  Years Ended September 30 
 2012  2011  2015  2014 
Deferred tax assets:            
Employee benefit accruals $53.9  $58.5  $106.4  $49.3 
Inventory  6.2   13.9 
Reserve for bad debts  12.4   9.3   8.4   10.0 
Accrued warranty  10.5   5.5 
Net operating loss carryforwards  39.4   22.8   45.8   40.3 
Tax credit carryforwards  1.8   1.9   11.7   2.5 
Other, net  26.7   30.4   39.6   25.7 
  144.7   128.4   218.1   141.7 
Less: Valuation allowance  (8.6)  (8.1)  (40.7)  (28.3)
Total deferred tax assets  136.1   120.3   177.4   113.4 
                
Deferred tax liabilities:                
Depreciation  (33.9)  (41.2)  (35.3)  (13.9)
Amortization  (81.1)  (33.9)  (409.1)  (62.8)
Other, net  (2.0)  (4.7)  (16.4)  (4.9)
Total deferred tax liabilities  (117.0)  (79.8)  (460.8)  (81.6)
Deferred tax asset - net $19.1  $40.5 
Deferred tax asset (liability) - net $(283.4) $31.8 

At September 30, 2012,2015, we had $35.0$43.2 million of deferred tax assets related to operating loss carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions that are subject to various carryforward periods with the majority eligible to be carried forward for an unlimited period. WeAdditionally, we had $1.9$2.2 million of deferred tax assets related to domestic federal net operating loss carryforwards thatwhich will expire in 2031.  We also had $2.5between 2019 and 2033 and $0.4 million of deferred tax assets related to state net operating loss carryforwards, which expire between 20132016 and 2031.  For tax credits, we2033. We had $1.5$11.7 million of deferred tax assets related to state tax credits, some of which will be carried forward for an unlimited period and some of which will expire between 20132016 and 2027 and $0.3 million of credits in foreign jurisdictions that do not expire.2026.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, we recognized a one-time tax benefit of $11.0 million related to the tax reorganization of a portion of our international operations.  The reorganization triggered adjustments to the value of certain of our deferred tax attributes including the write-off of deferred tax liabilities that had previously reduced the realizable value of our foreign net operating loss carryforwards.

74

The gross deferred tax assets as of September 30, 20122015 were reduced by valuation allowances of $8.6$40.7 million relating primarily related to certain foreign deferred tax attributes and state tax credit carryforwards as it is more likely than not that some portion or all of these tax attributes will not be realized. In evaluating whether it is more likely than not that we would recover our deferred tax assets, future taxable income, the reversal of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies were considered. We believe that our estimates for the valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets are appropriate based on current facts and circumstances.

We operate under tax holidays in both Singapore and Puerto Rico. The Singapore tax holiday is effective through 2016 with potential to extend through 2018 while the Puerto Rico tax holiday is effective through 2025. Both incentives are conditional on meeting certain employment and/or investment thresholds. The impact of these tax holidays decreased foreign taxes by $1.7$4.3 million in fiscal 2012 and $0.72015, $4.0 million for fiscal 2011.2014 and $2.9 million for fiscal 2013. The benefit of the tax holidays on net income per share (diluted) was $0.03$0.07, $0.07 and $0.01$0.05 for fiscal 20122015, 2014 and 2011,2013, respectively.

With respect to the undistributed earnings of Welch Allyn’s foreign subsidiaries, given the timing of the acquisition, we are still evaluating the investment of such foreign earnings. As for the undistributed earnings of Hill-Rom’s foreign subsidiaries, including Welch Allyn for the post-acquisition period, foreign earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested for use in meeting working capital, business expansion and development, and other general needs. Accordingly, no provision has been made for deferred taxes related to the future repatriation of such earnings. If such earnings were repatriated, additional tax expense may result. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that may be payable upon any such distribution.

We file a consolidated federal income tax return as well as multiple state, local and foreign jurisdiction tax returns. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by the taxing authorities in each of the jurisdictions where we file tax returns. During fiscal 2012,2015, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) concluded its audit for fiscal year 2010.  Also during fiscal 2012, the IRS2013 and initiated and is still conducting its post-filing examination of the fiscal 20112014 consolidated federal return. We continue to participate in the IRS Compliance Assurance Program (“CAP”) for fiscal year 20122015 and have submitted the application to remain in the CAP for fiscal 2013years 2016 and 2014.2017. The CAP provides the opportunity for the IRS to review certain tax matters prior to us filing our tax return for the year, thereby reducing the time it takes to complete the post-filing examination. We are also subject to state and local or foreign income tax examinations by taxing authorities for years back to fiscal 2006.2009.

Welch Allyn also filed a consolidated federal income tax return as well as multiple state, local and foreign jurisdiction tax returns. In the normal course of business, Welch Allyn is subject to examination by the taxing authorities in each of the jurisdictions where it files tax returns. During calendar year 2015, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) concluded its post-filing audit for calendar year 2013 (subject to certain exceptions), and initiated its post-filing examination of the calendar year 2014 consolidated federal return. Welch Allyn continues to participate in the IRS Compliance Assurance Program (“CAP”) for 2015 to include the period up through the date of the acquisition by Hill-Rom on September 8, 2015. Thereafter, Welch Allyn will be integrated into Hill-Rom’s CAP going forward. Welch Allyn has received Partial Acceptance Letters from the IRS under CAP for calendar years 2011 through 2014 primarily for an issue that’s before Competent Authority.
71


We also have on-going audits in various stages of completion in several state and foreign jurisdictions, one or more of which may conclude within the next 12 months. Such settlements could involve some or all of the following: the payment of additional taxes, the adjustment of certain deferred taxes and/or the recognition of unrecognized tax benefits. The resolution of these matters, in combination with the expiration of certain statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions, make it reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits may decrease as a result of either payment or recognition by approximately $3$0.5 to $7$1.5 million in the next twelve months, excluding interest.

The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was $9.8$5.8 million, $17.8$4.1 million and $24.0$4.6 million, which includes $8.4$3.3 million, $11.5$2.7 million and $8.0$3.9 million that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate in future periods. The remaining amount relates to items which, if recognized, would not impact our effective tax rate.

75


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011  2010 
Balance at October 1 $17.8  $24.0  $35.5 
Increases in tax position of prior years  0.5   0.4   3.9 
Decreases in tax position of prior years  (2.7)  (3.0)  (6.8)
Increases in tax positions related to the current year  -   5.1   1.4 
Settlements with taxing authorities  (3.8)  (5.2)  (6.0)
Lapse of applicable statute of limitations  (1.9)  (3.5)  (4.0)
Foreign currency adjustments  (0.1)  -   - 
Total change  (8.0)  (6.2)  (11.5)
Balance at September 30 $9.8  $17.8  $24.0 

 Years Ended September 30 
 2015  2014  2013 
Balance at October 1$4.1  $4.6  $9.8 
Increases in tax position of prior years 0.4   2.1   - 
Decreases in tax position of prior years (1.3)  (0.9)  (0.5)
Increases in tax positions related to the current year -   -   0.1 
Settlements with taxing authorities (1.2)  (0.1)  (3.2)
Lapse of applicable statute of limitations (1.3)  (1.5)  (1.7)
Increase in positions due to acquisitions 5.5   -   - 
Foreign currency adjustments (0.4)  (0.1)  0.1 
Total change 1.7   (0.5)  (5.2)
Balance at September 30$5.8  $4.1  $4.6 
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties, which are not presented in the reconciliation table above, were $0.8$3.0 million, $1.9$0.4 million and $2.1$0.6 million at September 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013. Related to interest and penalties, we recognized an income tax benefit (expense) of less than$0.2 million in 2015, $0.2 million in 2014 and $0.1 million in 2012, ($0.1) million in 2011 and $3.0 million in 2010.2013.

The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits reflected in our financial statements include amounts related to our former funeral services business for taxing jurisdictions where we filed consolidated tax returns.  Pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement entered into as part of the spin-off, Hillenbrand, Inc. is responsible for the portion of the unrecognized tax benefits attributable to the funeral services business.  During fiscal 2012, we were able to resolve all of the remaining unrecognized tax benefits attributable to Hillenbrand, Inc.

NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per share is calculated based upon the weighted average number of outstanding common shares for the period, plus the effect of deferred vested shares. Diluted earnings per share is calculated consistent with the basic earnings per share calculation plus the effect of dilutive unissued common shares related to stock-based employee compensation programs. For all years presented, anti-dilutive stock options were excluded from the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. Excluded shares were 1.40.2 million, 0.60.3 million and 3.41.4 million for fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013. Cumulative treasury stock acquired, less cumulative shares reissued, have been excluded in determining the average number of shares outstanding.

72


Earnings per share is calculated as follows:
 
 Years Ended September 30  Years Ended September 30 
 2012  2011  2010  2015  2014  2013 
                  
Net income attributable to common shareholders $120.8  $133.3  $125.3  $47.7  $60.6  $105.0 
                        
Average shares outstanding - Basic (thousands)  62,120   63,164   62,934   57,249   57,555   59,910 
Add potential effect of exercise of stock options                        
and other unvested equity awards (thousands)  241   735   805   1,287   968   340 
Average shares outstanding - Diluted (thousands)  62,361   63,899   63,739   58,536   58,523   60,250 
                        
Net income attributable to common shareholders            
per common share - Basic $1.94  $2.11  $1.99 
Net income attributable to common shareholders per common share - Basic $0.83  $1.05  $1.75 
                        
Net income attributable to common shareholders            
per common share - Diluted $1.94  $2.09  $1.97 
Net income attributable to common shareholders per common share - Diluted $0.82  $1.04  $1.74 

76


NOTE 11. SEGMENT REPORTING

We disclose segment information that is consistent with the way in which management operates and views the business. During the fourth quarter ofBeginning in fiscal 2012,2014, we changed our segmentdefinition of divisional income within our internal reporting to reflect changes in our organizational structure and management’s viewmanagement to exclude the impacts of the business.  As part of these changes, we combined the North America Acute Care and components of the North America Post-Acute Care segments into a new North America segment.  At the same time we created the Surgical and Respiratory Care segment which contains the surgical reporting unit (formerly part of the North America Acute Care segment), the respiratory care reporting unit (formerly part of the North America Post-Acute Care segment) and the recently acquired Aspen Surgical business.  There were no changes to the International segment.  The prior yearacquisition-related intangible asset amortization. All segment information included below has been updated to reflect these changes.this change.

Our new operating structure containsconsists of the following three reporting segments:

 ·
North America - sells and rents our patient support and near-patient technologies and services, as well as our health information technology solutions, in the U.S. and Canada.
 
 ·
Surgical and Respiratory Care - sells and rents our surgical and respiratory care products in all settingsglobally.
 
 ·
International - sells and rents similar products as our North America segment in regions outside of the U.S. and Canada.
 
Our performance under the new operating structure continues to beeach reportable segment is measured on a divisional income basis before non-allocated operating and administrative costs, impairment on goodwill andof other intangibles, litigation, special charges, acquisition and special charges.integration costs, acquisition-related intangible asset amortization, and other unusual events. Divisional income generally represents the division’s standard gross profit less its direct operating costs along with an allocation of manufacturing and distribution costs, research and development and certain corporate functional expenses.

Corporate expenses, while not considered a segment, are presented separately to aid in the reconciliation of segment information to consolidated financial information. TheseNon-allocated operating and administrative costs include corporatefunctional expenses that support the entire organization such as administration, finance, legal and human resources.resources, expenses associated with strategic developments, acquisition-related intangible asset amortization, and other events that are not indicative of operating trends. We exclude such amounts from divisional income to allow management to evaluate and understand divisional operating trends without the effects of such items.

In September 2015, we acquired Welch Allyn Holdings, Inc. (“Welch Allyn”). The results of Welch Allyn’s operations for the 22 days under our ownership are reported as a reconciling item in our segment disclosures for the year ended September 30, 2015.
 
  Years Ended September 30 
  2015  2014  2013 
Revenue:         
North America $1,002.0  $888.9  $958.3 
Surgical and Respiratory Care  506.6   301.6   245.8 
International  429.4   495.6   512.1 
Welch Allyn1
  50.2   -   - 
     Total revenue $1,988.2  $1,686.1  $1,716.2 
             
Divisional income:            
North America $204.1  $165.0  $201.7 
Surgical and Respiratory Care  80.5   68.6   56.8 
International  12.8   24.9   33.5 
             
Other:            
Non-allocated operating costs, administrative costs, and other  173.1   98.8   131.4 
Special charges  41.2   37.1   5.7 
     Operating profit  83.1   122.6   154.9 
             
Interest expense  (18.4)  (9.8)  (9.5)
Investment income and other, net  0.4   2.4   (1.4)
     Income before income taxes $65.1  $115.2  $144.0 
1 Welch Allyn is not considered a separate reportable segment but is presented as a reconciling item to total consolidated revenue.

 
7377

 
  Years Ended September 30 
  2012  2011  2010 
Revenues:         
North America $998.2  $1,057.2  $958.2 
Surgical and Respiratory Care  153.2   132.9   123.3 
International  482.9   401.6   388.1 
     Total revenues $1,634.3  $1,591.7  $1,469.6 
             
Divisional income:            
North America $198.9  $230.6  $185.7 
Surgical and Respiratory Care  38.1   40.0   38.1 
International  18.6   27.9   29.9 
Corporate expenses  (64.2)  (83.0)  (70.0)
     Total divisional income  191.4   215.5   183.7 
             
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles  8.0   -   - 
Litigation (credit) charge  (3.6)  47.3   (21.2)
Special charges  18.2   1.4   13.2 
     Operating profit  168.8   166.8   191.7 
             
Interest expense  (6.5)  (8.5)  (8.7)
Investment income and other, net  1.2   1.4   (0.1)
     Income before income taxes $163.5  $159.7  $182.9 

Geographic Information

Geographic data for net revenuesrevenue and long-lived assets (which consist mainly of property and equipment leased to others) were as follows:

 Years Ended September 30  Years Ended September 30 
 2012  2011  2010  2015  2014  2013 
Net revenues to unaffiliated customers: (a)
         
Net revenue to unaffiliated customers: (a)
         
United States $1,077.8  $1,105.0  $1,027.1  $1,273.0  $1,070.8  $1,116.4 
Foreign  556.5   486.7   442.5   715.2   615.3   599.8 
Total revenues $1,634.3  $1,591.7  $1,469.6 
Total revenue $1,988.2  $1,686.1  $1,716.2 
Long-lived assets: (b)
                        
United States $172.5  $180.2  $200.3  $263.9  $151.7  $158.0 
Foreign  77.6   42.6   43.4   114.5   109.8   76.3 
Total long-lived assets $250.1  $222.8  $243.7  $378.4  $261.5  $234.3 

(a)Net revenues arerevenue is attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the customer.
(b)Includes property and equipment leased to others.
74


NOTE 12. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The following table presents selected consolidated financial data by quarter for each of the last two fiscal years.

2012 Quarter Ended            
  
December 31,
2011
  
March 31,
2012
  
June 30,
2012
  
September 30,
2012
 
             
Net revenues $381.1  $415.1  $406.5  $431.6 
Gross profit $185.1  $195.8  $172.7  $201.1 
Net income attributable to common shareholders $32.9  $25.3  $23.4  $39.2 
Basic net income attributable to common                
shareholders per common share $0.53  $0.41  $0.38  $0.63 
Diluted net income attributable to common                
shareholders per common share $0.53  $0.40  $0.37  $0.63 
                 
                 
2011 Quarter Ended                
  
December 31,
2010
  
March 31,
2011
  
June 30,
2011
  
September 30,
2011
 
                 
Net revenues $374.2  $402.1  $384.8  $430.6 
Gross profit $184.5  $198.6  $187.6  $210.6 
Net income attributable to common shareholders $35.2  $33.1  $1.5  $63.5 
Basic net income attributable to common                
shareholders per common share $0.56  $0.53  $0.02  $1.01 
Diluted net income attributable to common                
shareholders per common share $0.55  $0.52  $0.02  $1.01 
2015 Quarter Ended 
December 31,
2014
  
March 31,
2015
  
June 30,
2015
  
September 30,
2015
 
             
Net revenue $465.0  $474.8  $474.5  $573.9 
Gross profit $199.9  $214.2  $209.5  $256.7 
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders $12.1  $26.1  $19.1  $(9.6)
Basic net income (loss) attributable to common
     shareholders per common share
 $0.21  $0.46  $0.34  $(0.16)
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to common
     shareholders per common share
 $0.21  $0.45  $0.33  $(0.16)

2014 Quarter Ended 
December 31,
2013
  
March 31,
2014
  
June 30,
2014
  
September 30,
2014
 
             
Net revenue $393.4  $415.3  $397.6  $479.8 
Gross profit $176.8  $202.7  $187.1  $213.3 
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders $13.2  $(3.3) $26.1  $24.6 
Basic net income (loss) attributable to common
     shareholders per common share
 $0.23  $(0.06) $0.46  $0.43 
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to common
     shareholders per common share
 $0.22  $(0.06) $0.45  $0.42 

78


NOTE 13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

Rental expense for fiscal years 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was $20.7$25.2 million, $20.0$24.7 million and $19.5$21.5 million. The table below indicates the minimum annual rental commitments (excluding renewable periods) aggregating $59.8$73.8 million, for manufacturing facilities, warehouse distribution centers, service centers and sales offices, under non-cancelable operating leases.

  Amount 
2013 $19.7 
2014 $13.2 
2015 $10.0 
2016 $7.1 
2017 $5.3 
2018 and beyond $4.5 
  Amount 
2016 $28.2 
2017 $18.4 
2018 $12.1 
2019 $6.3 
2020 $3.2 
2021 and beyond $5.6 

We have a long-term agreement with IBM to manage our global information structure environment that expires in September 2014, however, as of September 30, 2012 we notified IBM that we would be terminating our long-term agreement in fiscal 2013.  We have estimated the termination fee to be $0.6 million and accrued the fee as of September 30, 2012.

75

Self Insurance

We are involved inwith various possible claims, including product and are generally self-insured up to certain limits for product/general liability, workers’ compensation, auto liability and professional liability insurance programs.  These policiesemployment related matters. Such claims in the United States have deductibles and self-insured retentions ranging from $150$25 thousand to $1.5$1.0 million per occurrence or per claim, depending upon the type of coverage and policy period. International deductibles and self-insured retentions are lower. We are also generally self-insured up to certain stop-loss limits for certain employee health benefits, including medical, drug and dental. Our policy is to estimate reserves based upon a number of factors including known claims, estimated incurred but not reported claims and outside actuarial analysis, which are based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Such estimated reserves are classified as Other Current Liabilities and Other Long-Term Liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Legal Proceedings

Batesville Casket AntitrustUniversal Hospital Services, Inc. Litigation

In 2005 the Funeral Consumers Alliance,On January 13, 2015, Universal Hospital Services, Inc. and a number of individual consumer casket purchasers filed a purported class action antitrust lawsuit on behalf of certain consumer purchasers of Batesville® casketscomplaint against us and our former Batesville Casket Company, Inc. subsidiary (now wholly-owned by Hillenbrand, Inc.), and three national funeral home businesses.

The district court dismissed the claims and denied class certification, but in October 2010, the plaintiffs appealed these decisions to the United States District Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.  In September 2012, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the denialWestern District of class certification and remanded back to the District Court the plaintiffs’ claim for attorney fees.  On October 1, 2012, Batesville Casket Company, Inc. entered into a confidential settlement agreement fully resolving the lawsuit.

Texas. The settlement of the lawsuit results in the termination of the Judgment Sharing Agreement between us and Hillenbrand, Inc. as well as certain restrictive covenants imposed on us pursuant to the Distribution Agreement with Hillenbrand, Inc. dated March 14, 2008.  The restrictive covenants had limited our ability to,plaintiff alleges, among other things, increase our dividend, incur indebtedness, make share repurchasesthat we engaged in certain customer contracting practices in violation of state and complete acquisitions.federal antitrust laws. The plaintiff also has asserted claims for tortious interference with business relationships. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and money damages in an unspecified amount. We believe that the allegations are without merit and intend to defend this matter vigorously.

Stryker Litigation

On April 4, 2011, we filed two separate actions against Stryker Corporation alleging infringement of certain Hill-Rom patents covering proprietary communications networks, status information systems and powered wheels used in our beds or stretchers. Both suits seeksought monetary damages and injunctions against Stryker for selling or distributing any beds, stretchers or ancillary products that infringe on Hill-Rom’s patents. Stryker responded with counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment for noninfringement and invalidity for several of the patents at issue, and has filed counterclaims alleging infringement of three of their patents. On August 14, 2012, we entered into a confidential favorable settlement agreement with Stryker Corporation fully resolving all of their counterclaims andto resolve our lawsuit regarding claims about our powered wheel patents.patents, and on March 26, 2015, we entered into a confidential favorable settlement agreement with Stryker Corporation to resolve our claims about our status information systems. No trial date for the remaining lawsuitclaims covering proprietary communications networks has been set.  Because the litigation is in a preliminary stage,set, and accordingly we cannot, at this time, assess the likelihood of a positive or negativeany potential outcome or determine an estimate,damages or a range of estimates, of potential damages, nor can we give any assurances that this matter will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Office of Inspector General Investigation

In February 2008, we were served with an Administrative Investigative Demand subpoena by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Tennessee pursuant to a Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General investigation.  In September 2008, we were informed that the investigation was precipitated by the 2005 filing of a qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.  In June 2011, we reached agreement with respect to a tentative financial settlement and recognized a charge in the third quarter of $42.3 million.  This settlement was finalized and paid in September 2011.  Concurrently with this settlement, we entered into a five year Corporate Integrity Agreement, which provides for certain other compliance-related activities during the five year term of the agreement, including specific written standards, monitoring, training, education, independent review, disclosure and reporting requirements. We did not admit any wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
76

Freedom Medical Antitrust Litigation

On October 19, 2009, Freedom Medical, Inc. filed a complaint against us, another manufacturer and two group purchasing organizations in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.  The plaintiff alleged, among other things, that we and the other defendants conspired to exclude it from the biomedical equipment rental market and to maintain our market share by engaging in a variety of conduct in violation of state and federal antitrust laws.  In September 2011, we settled this matter in exchange for a payment of $5.0 million.  We did not admit any wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
Antitrust Settlement

In fiscal 2005, we entered into a definitive, court approved agreement with Spartanburg Regional Healthcare Systems and its attorneys to settle a purported antitrust class action lawsuit.  A number of potential plaintiffs, including the United States government, opted out of the settlement, and we retained a reserve of $21.2 million against these potential claims.  However, no individual claims were filed prior to the August 2010 statute of limitations deadline, and we therefore reversed this reserve into income as of September 30, 2010.relief.

General

We are subject to various other claims and contingencies arising out of the normal course of business, including those relating to governmental investigations and proceedings, commercial transactions, product liability, employee related matters, antitrust, safety, health, taxes, environmental  and other matters. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties and the outcome of individual litigated matters is not predictable with assurance. It is possible that some litigation matters for which reserves have not been established could be decided unfavorably to us, and that any such unfavorable decisions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

NOTE 14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In October 2012, the Board approved an expansion of its previously announced share repurchase authorization by 3.5 million shares, bringing the total number of shares available for repurchase to 32.2 million shares of which 28.2 million shares have been repurchased.
 
 
7779

 
Item 9.      CHANGESCHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A.    CONTROLS
Item 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the supervision and participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (the “Certifying Officers”), has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2012.2015. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Certifying Officers and our Board of Directors, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon that evaluation, the Certifying Officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2012.2015.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The report of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20122015 and the related report of our independent registered public accounting firm, are included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As described in the following paragraph, there were changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We have excluded Völker and Aspen SurgicalWelch Allyn from our assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2012,2015, because they wereWelch Allyn was acquired by us in separatea purchase business combinations during 2012.  Völkercombination in the fourth quarter of 2015. Welch Allyn is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenuesrevenue represent 59 percent and 43 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012.  Aspen Surgical is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 15 percent and 1 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 30, 2012.2015. We are currently in the process of evaluating and integrating Völker and Aspen SurgicalWelch Allyn’s historical internal control over financial reporting structure with ours. We expect to complete this integration in fiscal 2013.2016.

Other than the changes noted above, there have been no other changes to our internal controls over financial reporting. Management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting is included under Item 8 above.

Item 9B. OTHEROTHER INFORMATION

On November 12, 2012, one of our directors, Katherine Napier, informed us that due to competing commitments, she would not stand for re-election at our next annual stockholders meeting in March 2013.None.

 
PART III

Item 10.DIRECTORS,
Item 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in January 20132016 relating to our 20132016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2013“2016 Proxy Statement”), under the headings “Election of Directors”, “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, and “Corporate Governance.” Information relating to our executive officers is included in this report in Part I, Item 1 under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”

Item 11.
Item 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the 20132016 Proxy Statement, under the heading “Executive Compensation.”

Item 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTItem 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the 20132016 Proxy Statement, under the headings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”



Item 14.    PRINCIPAL
Item 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the 20132016 Proxy Statement, where such information is included under the heading “Proposals Requiring Your Vote - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

 

Item 15.EXHIBITS
Item 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)The following documents have been filed as a part of this Form 10-K or, where noted, incorporated by reference:

 (1)Financial Statements

The financial statements of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are listed under Part II, Item 8 on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 37.41.

 (2)Financial Statement Schedules

The financial statement schedule filed in response to Part II, Item 8 and Part IV, Item 15(c) of Form 10-K is listed under Part II, Item 8 on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 37.41.

 (3)Exhibits (See changes to Exhibit Index below):

“The Exhibit Index, which follows the signature page to this Form 10-K and is hereby incorporated herein by reference, sets forth a list of those exhibits filed herewith, and includes and identifies management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K by Item 601 (b)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K.”

The agreements included as exhibits to this Form 10-K are intended to provide information regarding their terms and not to provide any other factual or disclosure information about us or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by the parties to the agreements, including us, solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement. Such representation and warranties:

 ·should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
 ·may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;
 ·may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to certain investors; and
 ·were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time.

 
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

For The Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013

(Dollars in millions)
    ADDITIONS           ADDITIONS         
 BALANCE AT  CHARGED TO  CHARGED TO   DEDUCTIONS   BALANCE  BALANCE AT  CHARGED TO  CHARGED TO   DEDUCTIONS   BALANCE 
 BEGINNING  COSTS AND  OTHER   NET OF   AT END  BEGINNING  COSTS AND  OTHER   NET OF   AT END 
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD  EXPENSES  ACCOUNTS   RECOVERIES   OF PERIOD  OF PERIOD  EXPENSES  ACCOUNTS   RECOVERIES   OF PERIOD 
                                
Reserves deducted from assets to which they apply:                                
Allowance for possible losses and sales returns -                                
accounts receivable:                                
                                
Period Ended:                                
September 30, 2012 $26.7  $1.6  $18.5 (a) $(8.3)(b) $38.5 
September 30, 2011 $29.0  $1.5  $3.1 (a) $(6.9)(b) $26.7 
September 30, 2010 $27.5  $0.8  $7.2 (a) $(6.5)(b) $29.0 
September 30, 2015 $31.4  $1.8  $0.1 (a) $(7.3)(b) $26.0 
September 30, 2014 $30.1  $1.5  $8.6 (a) $(8.8)(b) $31.4 
September 30, 2013 $38.5  $2.7  $(0.1)(a) $(11.0)(b) $30.1 
                                          
Allowance for inventory valuation:                                          
                                          
Period Ended:                                          
September 30, 2012 $22.9  $2.2  $1.6 (c) $(4.7)(d) $22.0 
September 30, 2011 $24.7  $3.7  $- (c) $(5.5)(d) $22.9 
September 30, 2010 $28.3  $0.2  $- (c) $(3.8)(d) $24.7 
September 30, 2015 $42.9  $0.9  $5.7 (c) $(4.0)(d) $45.5 
September 30, 2014 $22.0  $4.0  $19.8 (c) $(2.9)(d) $42.9 
September 30, 2013 $22.0  $1.8  $-   $(1.8)(d) $22.0 
                                          
Valuation allowance against deferred tax assets:                                          
                                          
Period Ended:                                          
September 30, 2012 $8.1  $0.4  $-   $0.1 (e) $8.6 
September 30, 2011 $28.5  $(19.5) $-   $(0.9)(e) $8.1 
September 30, 2010 $37.5  $(0.8) $-   $(8.2)(e) $28.5 
                    
September 30, 2015 $28.3  $4.0  $11.1 (c) $(2.7)(e) $40.7 
September 30, 2014 $8.9  $21.3  $-   $(1.9)(e) $28.3 
September 30, 2013 $8.6  $0.6  $-   $(0.3)(e) $8.9 


(a)
Reduction of gross revenuesrevenue for uncollectible health care rental reimbursements, cash discounts and other adjustments in determining
net revenue.  Also includes the effect of acquired businesses, if any.
  
(b)Generally reflects the write-off  of specific receivables against recorded reserves.
  
(c)Generally reflects the effect of acquired businesses, if any.
  
(d)Generally reflects the write-off of specific inventory against recorded reserves.
  
(e)
Primarily reflects write-offs of deferred tax assets against the valuation allowance and other movement of the valuation allowance
offset by an opposing change in deferred tax assets.
 


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.
 
    
 By:/s/ John J. Greisch 
  John J. Greisch 
  President and Chief Executive Officer 
                         
Date: November 15, 201219, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.



/s/
Rolf A. Classon 
/s/
James R. Giertz
Rolf A. Classon
Chairman of the Board
 
James R. Giertz
Director
   
/s/
John J. Greisch 
/s/
Charles E. Golden
John J. Greisch
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
Charles E. Golden
Director
   
/s/
Mark       Steven J. Guinan                                                                        Strobel 
/s/       
W August Hillenbrand                                                                        William H. Kucheman
Mark           Steven J. GuinanStrobel
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal           (Principal Financial Officer)
 
W August HillenbrandWilliam H. Kucheman
Director
/s/       Richard G. Keller
 
/s/       Ronald A. Malone
/s/
Richard G. Keller
/s/ Ronald A. Malone                                                                        
Richard G. Keller
Vice President — Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal           (Principal Accounting Officer)
 
Ronald A. Malone
Director
/s/
Joanne C. Smith, M.D.                                                                        /s/Eduardo R. Menascé                                                                        
Joanne C. Smith, M.D.
Director       William G. Dempsey.
 
/s/       Eduardo R. Menascé
Director
William G. Dempsey
Director
 
Eduardo R. Menascé
Director
   
   
 
Stacy Enxing Seng
Director
   
Katherine S. Napier
Director

Date: November 15, 201219, 2015

 
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements are designated with “*”.


2.1Distribution Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 14, 2008June 16, 2015 by and betweenamong Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (formerly Hillenbrand Industries, Inc.), Empire Merger Sub Corp., and Hillenbrand, Inc. (formerly BatesvilleWelch Allyn Holdings, Inc.) (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with the Form 8-K dated April 1, 2008)June 17, 2015)

2.2LetterShare Purchase and Transfer Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008 betweenJune 13, 2014 by and among TRUMPF International Beteiligungs-GmbH, Hill-Rom Holdings Inc. and Hillenbrand, Inc. regarding interpretation of Distribution Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 filed with Form 10-Q dated May 14, 2008.)
2.3
Share Sale and Purchase Agreement dated as of December 15, 2011 between Völker GmbHNetherlands B.V., HR Europe B.V. and Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.11.1 filed with Form 8-K dated February 14, 2012)
June 16, 2014)
2.4Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 23, 2012 between Roundtable Healthcare Partners II, L.P. and Hill-Rom Inc. regarding the purchase of Aspen Surgical Products Holding, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with Form 8-K dated July 26, 2012)

3.1Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., as currently in effect (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with Form 8-K dated March 10, 2010)

3.2Amended and Restated Code of By-Laws of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., as currently in effect (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 filed with Form 8-K dated March 10, 2010)

4.1Indenture dated as of December 1, 1991, between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Union Bank, N.A. (as successor to LaSalle Bank National Association and Harris Trust and Savings Bank) as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (4) (a) to Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 33-44086)

4.2Indenture dated as of September 1, 2015, between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Trustee (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated September 8, 2015)

*10.1Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated Short Term Incentive Compensation Program (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with Form 10-K dated November 24, 2009)

*10.2Form of Director Indemnity Agreement (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with Form 10-K dated December 23, 2003)

*10.3Form of Indemnity Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and certain executive officers  (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with Form 10-K dated November 16, 2011)

*10.4Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Board of Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 filed with Form 10-Q dated July 13, 2001)

*10.5Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Director Phantom Stock Plan and form of award (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 filed with Form 10-Q dated July 13, 2001)

*10.6Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 filed with Form 10-K dated December 23, 2003)
*10.7
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under Amended and Restated Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 filed with Form 10-K dated November 16, 2011)

*10.810.7
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (CEO version) under Amended and Restated Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 filed with Form 10-K dated November 16, 2011)
*10.9Form of Performance Based Stock Award granted December 3, 2009 to certain executive officers, including the named executive officers, under the Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 filed with Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)
  10.10Credit Agreement dated as of March 28, 2008 among Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A. as agent for the lenders (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated April 1, 2008)
*10.11Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008 between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and  Peter H. Soderberg (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with Form 8-K dated April 1, 2008)
*10.12Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008 between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and John H. Dickey (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Form 8-K dated April 1, 2008)
*10.13Form of Change in Control Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Peter H. Soderberg (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with Form 8-K dated April 1, 2008)
  10.14Judgment Sharing Agreement dated as of March 14, 2008 among Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., Hillenbrand, Inc. and Batesville Casket Company, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 filed with Form 8-K dated April 1, 2008)
  10.15Tax Sharing Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008 between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Hillenbrand, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 filed with Form 8-K dated April 1, 2008)
*10.16Amended and Restated Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as currently in effect (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 filed with Form 10-K dated November 24, 2009)

*10.1710.9Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008 between Hill-Rom Company, Inc. and Richard G. Keller (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 filed with Form 10-Q dated May 14, 2008)

*10.18Letter Agreement dated September 27, 2009 between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Peter H. Soderberg (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with Form 8-K dated September 27, 2009)
*10.1910.10Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix I to the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A dated January 7, 2009)
85

*10.2010.11Employment Agreement dated January 6, 2010 between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and John J. Greisch (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with Form 8-K dated January 7, 2010)

*10.21Change in Control Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and John J. Greisch dated January 6, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with Form 8-K dated January 7, 2010)
*10.22Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and John J. Greisch dated January 6, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with Form 8-K dated January 7, 2010)
*10.23Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Alejandro Infante-Saracho dated May 6, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Form 10-Q dated May 6, 2010)
*10.24Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Alejandro Infante-Saracho dated May 6, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 filed with Form 10-Q dated May 6, 2010)
*10.2510.12Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Susan R. Lichtenstein dated May 10, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 filed with Form 10-Q dated May 6, 2010)
*10.26Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Susan R. Lichtenstein dated May 10, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 filed with Form 10-Q dated May 6, 2010)
 
*10.27Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Philip D. Settimi dated May 6, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 filed with Form 10-Q dated May 6, 2010)
*10.28Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Philip D. Settimi dated May 6, 2010 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 filed with Form 10-Q dated May 6, 2010)
*10.29Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Martha G. Aronson dated August 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)
*10.30Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Martha G. Aronson dated August 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)
*10.31Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Scott R. Jeffers dated September 13, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)
*10.32Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Scott R. Jeffers dated September 13, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)
*10.3310.13Form of Change in Control Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and certain of its officers, including Named Executive Officers (other than the CEO) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)

*10.3410.14Amended Change in Control Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and John J. Greisch dated September 30, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)

*10.3510.152011 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)
*10.3620132014 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

*10.3710.16Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Amended and Restated Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)

*10.3810.17Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (CEO version) under Amended and Restated Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.65 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 17, 2010)

*10.39Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Mark Guinan, dated November 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 1, 2010)
*10.40Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Mark Guinan, dated November 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 filed with the Company’s Form 8-K dated November 1, 2010)
*10.4110.18FY 2011 Form of Performance Based Stock Award under the Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 16, 2011)

*10.4210.19FY 2011 Form of Performance Based Stock Award under the Stock Incentive Plan (CEO version) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 16, 2011)
*10.43
Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Brian Lawrence, dated December 6, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q dated January 27, 2011)
*10.44
Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Brian Lawrence, dated December 6, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q dated January 27, 2011)

*10.45Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Michael O. Oliver, dated March 14, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q dated April 28, 2011)
*10.46Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Michael O. Oliver, dated March 14, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q dated April 28, 2011)
*10.4710.20Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Short-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Appendix 1 to the Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A dated January 18, 2011)

*10.4810.21Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.69 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 16, 2011)

*10.49Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Michael Murphy, dated July 14, 2012
*10.5010.22Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Alton Shader, dated July 11, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q dated July 28, 2011)

*10.51Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Alton Shader, dated July 11, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 filed with the Company’s Form 10-Q dated July 28, 2011)
*10.5210.23Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Andreas Frank, dated October 3, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.72 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 16, 2011)

*10.53Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Andreas Frank, dated October 3, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.73 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 16, 2011)
*10.5410.24Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Edward Gregory Pritchard,Carlyn Solomon, dated July 23, 2012October 3, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 9, 2014)

*10.5510.25Officer IndemnityEmployment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Edward Gregory Pritchard,Steven Strobel, dated JulyOctober 23, 20122014 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Company’s Form 8-K dated October 27, 2014)

*10.56Change in Control Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Edward Gregory Pritchard, dated July 23, 2012
*10.5710.26Credit Agreement dated as of August 24, 2012September 8, 2015 among Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc., the lenders named therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. as Term Loan A agent for the lenders and Goldman Sachs Bank USA as Term Loan B agent for the lenders (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated August 24, 2012)September 8, 2015)

*10.27
  99.1Schedules showing the effectForm of changes in reportable segments for quarterly periods in fiscal year 2009Limited Recapture Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and 2010certain of its officers, including Named Executive Officers (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.110.34 filed with the Company’s Form 10-K dated November 20, 2013)

*10.28Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Carlos Alonso-Marum dated March 19, 2015 (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q on April 28, 2011)dated August 7, 2015)

86

*10.29 Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Kenneth Meyers dated September 23, 2015

*10.30 Employment Agreement between Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and Taylor Smith dated November 11, 2013

10.31 FY 2016 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

21Subsidiaries of the Registrant

23Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INSXBRL Instance Document
 
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LABXBRL Extension Labels Linkbase Document
 
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
87
 87